<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/rss-style.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[Team IT Security - 📰 Alle Kategorien]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[https://tsecurity.de/export/rss/alle-kategorien.xml?q=thinking+differently+about+universal%2F]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[Das Gesamte Cyber Threat Intelligence Feed-Archiv von TSecurity.de. Alle Nachrichten, Sicherheitsmeldungen, Videos, Downloads und Analysen in einer zentralen Übersicht.]]></description>
<language>de-DE</language>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 05:38:43 +0200</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 05:38:43 +0200</pubDate>
<ttl>15</ttl>
<copyright>2026 Team IT Security</copyright>
<managingEditor>lakandor@tsecurity.de (Horus Sirius)</managingEditor>
<webMaster>lakandor@tsecurity.de (Horus Sirius)</webMaster>
<category>IT Security</category>
<category>Cybersecurity</category>
<category>Nachrichten</category>
<generator>Team IT Security RSS Generator v2.0</generator>

<atom:link href="https://tsecurity.de/export/rss/it-security.xml?q=thinking+differently+about+universal%2F" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<item>
<title><![CDATA[FAIRChem v2 UMA for Multidomain Atomistic Simulation across Molecules, Catalysts, Materials, Vibrations, and Molecular Dynamics]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[In this tutorial, we explore FAIRChem v2 and the UMA universal machine-learning interatomic potential as a unified framework for atomistic simulation across molecular chemistry, catalysis, and inorganic materials. We configure an environment, authenticate with Hugging Face to access the gated UMA...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3695386/ai-nachrichten/fairchem-v2-uma-for-multidomain-atomistic-simulation-across-molecules-catalysts-materials-vibrations-and-molecular-dynamics/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3695386/ai-nachrichten/fairchem-v2-uma-for-multidomain-atomistic-simulation-across-molecules-catalysts-materials-vibrations-and-molecular-dynamics/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 10:53:59 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this tutorial, we explore FAIRChem v2 and the UMA universal machine-learning interatomic potential as a unified framework for atomistic simulation across molecular chemistry, catalysis, and inorganic materials. We configure an environment, authenticate with Hugging Face to access the gated UMA model weights, and initialize task-specific calculators for the omol, oc20, and omat domains. We […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.marktechpost.com/2026/07/26/fairchem-v2-uma-for-multidomain-atomistic-simulation-across-molecules-catalysts-materials-vibrations-and-molecular-dynamics/">FAIRChem v2 UMA for Multidomain Atomistic Simulation across Molecules, Catalysts, Materials, Vibrations, and Molecular Dynamics</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.marktechpost.com/">MarkTechPost</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Alte Öllöcher als Akku: Bohrloch-Batterie soll Energie speichern]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag Alte Öllöcher als Akku: Bohrloch-Batterie soll Energie speichern erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Stromspitzen bei den erneuerbaren Energien stellen die Stromnetze vor Herausforde...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3695176/it-security-nachrichten/alte-oelloecher-als-akku-bohrloch-batterie-soll-energie-speichern/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3695176/it-security-nachrichten/alte-oelloecher-als-akku-bohrloch-batterie-soll-energie-speichern/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 07:18:53 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/26/bohrloch-batterie/">Alte Öllöcher als Akku: Bohrloch-Batterie soll Energie speichern</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Stromspitzen bei den erneuerbaren Energien stellen die Stromnetze vor Herausforderungen. Ein neuer Ansatz nutzt nun stillgelegte Öl- und Gasbohrlöcher als thermische Großspeicher für überschüssigen Strom aus Photovoltaikanlagen. Das Verfahren soll ungenutzte Infrastrukturen in regulierbare grüne Leistung für Zeiten hoher Nachfrage umwandeln.  Eine Analyse von Phil Cruver, Chef des US-Unternehmens Geo2Watts, beleuchte das Potenzial sogenannter Bohrloch-Batterien […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/26/bohrloch-batterie/">Alte Öllöcher als Akku: Bohrloch-Batterie soll Energie speichern</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[This is one of the most interesting and comfortable gaming keyboards I’ve ever tested — but also one of the most divisive]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The K63W Pro tries to do things a little differently — but are its departures a success?]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694984/it-nachrichten/this-is-one-of-the-most-interesting-and-comfortable-gaming-keyboards-ive-ever-tested-but-also-one-of-the-most-divisive/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694984/it-nachrichten/this-is-one-of-the-most-interesting-and-comfortable-gaming-keyboards-ive-ever-tested-but-also-one-of-the-most-divisive/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 06:31:00 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The K63W Pro tries to do things a little differently — but are its departures a success?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Alte Öllöcher als Akku: Bohrloch-Batterie soll Energie speichern]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag Alte Öllöcher als Akku: Bohrloch-Batterie soll Energie speichern erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Stromspitzen bei den erneuerbaren Energien stellen die Stromnetze vor Herausforde...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694966/it-nachrichten/alte-oelloecher-als-akku-bohrloch-batterie-soll-energie-speichern/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694966/it-nachrichten/alte-oelloecher-als-akku-bohrloch-batterie-soll-energie-speichern/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 06:30:36 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/26/bohrloch-batterie/">Alte Öllöcher als Akku: Bohrloch-Batterie soll Energie speichern</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Stromspitzen bei den erneuerbaren Energien stellen die Stromnetze vor Herausforderungen. Ein neuer Ansatz nutzt nun stillgelegte Öl- und Gasbohrlöcher als thermische Großspeicher für überschüssigen Strom aus Photovoltaikanlagen. Das Verfahren soll ungenutzte Infrastrukturen in regulierbare grüne Leistung für Zeiten hoher Nachfrage umwandeln.  Eine Analyse von Phil Cruver, Chef des US-Unternehmens Geo2Watts, beleuchte das Potenzial sogenannter Bohrloch-Batterien […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/26/bohrloch-batterie/">Alte Öllöcher als Akku: Bohrloch-Batterie soll Energie speichern</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Alte Öllöcher als Akku: Bohrloch-Batterie soll Energie speichern]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag Alte Öllöcher als Akku: Bohrloch-Batterie soll Energie speichern erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Stromspitzen bei den erneuerbaren Energien stellen die Stromnetze vor Herausforde...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694967/it-nachrichten/alte-oelloecher-als-akku-bohrloch-batterie-soll-energie-speichern/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694967/it-nachrichten/alte-oelloecher-als-akku-bohrloch-batterie-soll-energie-speichern/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 06:30:36 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/26/bohrloch-batterie/">Alte Öllöcher als Akku: Bohrloch-Batterie soll Energie speichern</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Stromspitzen bei den erneuerbaren Energien stellen die Stromnetze vor Herausforderungen. Ein neuer Ansatz nutzt nun stillgelegte Öl- und Gasbohrlöcher als thermische Großspeicher für überschüssigen Strom aus Photovoltaikanlagen. Das Verfahren soll ungenutzte Infrastrukturen in regulierbare grüne Leistung für Zeiten hoher Nachfrage umwandeln.  Eine Analyse von Phil Cruver, Chef des US-Unternehmens Geo2Watts, beleuchte das Potenzial sogenannter Bohrloch-Batterien […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/26/bohrloch-batterie/">Alte Öllöcher als Akku: Bohrloch-Batterie soll Energie speichern</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple could ‘run the table’ on AI if it does things right]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Looking ahead just a short time, Apple could hold a powerful position in AI where it most makes sense: deployment.



Not only will the company offer up its own AI models for the kind of tasks millions use ChatGPT to do today, but it will provide more sophisticated on-device agentic models to hel...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694780/ai-nachrichten/apple-could-run-the-table-on-ai-if-it-does-things-right/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694780/ai-nachrichten/apple-could-run-the-table-on-ai-if-it-does-things-right/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:50:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Looking ahead just a short time, Apple could hold a powerful position in AI where it most makes sense: deployment.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Not only will the company offer up its own AI models for the kind of tasks millions use ChatGPT to do today, but it will provide more sophisticated on-device agentic models to help users get things done through Siri AI.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Apple also <a href="https://www.macobserver.com/news/apple-calls-its-new-assistant-siri-ai-at-wwdc-2026-gemini-partnership-now-official/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">offers limited capacity for more complex tasks</a> through <a href="https://www.applemust.com/apple-commences-us-manufacturing-of-private-cloud-compute-servers/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Private Cloud Compute</a>, and, in partnership with the likes of Google in the US and Alibaba in China, the company is giving users a trusted conduit through which to access even more sophisticated AI services. </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Deeply deployable</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Critics can say it <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4168225/wwdc-2026-how-apple-can-take-a-great-leap-in-ai.html">took Apple a long time</a> to get to this point, but they also seem to think the company has finally got the mix right with its series 27 operating systems. Arriving late to a party <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4164979/apple-will-be-behind-on-ai-until-it-isnt.html">doesn’t mean you won’t shine once you get there</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Apple is also coming up the inside lane around frontier AI, with iterative OS and hardware enhancements that mean its devices become increasingly effective for <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4016798/why-i-hope-apple-keeps-investing-in-on-device-ai.html">Edge AI use cases</a>, on device — no cloud service required.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The company appears to be digging down into those use cases. Mark Gurman at Bloomberg recently predicted that <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/semiconductors/apples-rumored-m7-ultra-targets-1-5tb-of-memory-and-blackwell-class-ai" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">future M7 Ultra Macs</a> will support as much as 1.5TB RAM, making these systems more than capable of running full weight frontier models in people’s offices, colleges, and homes. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While that does assume the <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4187825/the-trillion-dollar-ai-hallucination.html">AI-flationary memory market</a> can supply that much RAM at prices humans can afford, it is also true that people are already <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4092162/apples-macos-ai-for-the-rest-of-us.html">running AI clusters</a> using off-the-shelf Mac minis networked over Thunderbolt cables. It’s no stretch to believe <a href="https://www.applemust.com/macweb-now-offers-mac-mini-cloud-clusters-in-east-coast-data-centre/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">this will continue to be the case</a>, and that it will even broaden as the power/performance offered at the high end grows.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What’s wrong with good enough?</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When combined with open AI stacks, particularly newly emerging varieties, Apple’s platforms should become leading contenders for <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4074648/apples-big-bang-ai-moment-is-approaching.html">private AI services</a> and edge AI. Many business users will leap at the chance to offer their workers powerful, self-hosted, private AI services using one or more daisy-chained Mac Studios or Mac minis. The recent craze in deployment of both Macs to support <a href="https://openclaw.ai/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">OpenClaw</a> instances shows they already are.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ultimately, these different slices of momentum mean I agree with <a href="https://podcastalpha.substack.com/p/all-in-can-ai-regulate-itself-stripe" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">investor Jason Calacanis</a> that Apple is in position to apply a great deal of pressure on OpenAI and Claude just by putting models on their devices. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It’s also worth thinking about how people use AI today. How many of the queries made in the world right now constitute relatively simple tasks that could be transacted by on-device AI, such as the emerging new version of Apple Intelligence or even smaller LLM models running on device? You can even run <a href="https://9to5mac.com/2026/07/14/prismml-releases-bonsai-27b-claiming-first-major-ai-model-of-its-size-fit-for-iphone/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">PrismML’s 1-bit, 27-billion parameter Bonsai</a> on an iPad using the Locally app, and that’s in the here and now.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What happens? Pretty soon you’ll find people recognize that they can already run the vast majority of their AI-augmented workflows using services they <a href="https://www.applemust.com/morgan-stanley-its-when-not-if-apple-will-deliver-ai-on-the-edge/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">have on their existing device</a> or can access on their on-prem Mac set-ups. And, of course, as people get used to running small tasks locally and larger tasks on premises, the actual space in which they need to turn to cloud-based frontier models <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4195657/apple-is-prepping-for-life-after-the-ai-gold-rush.html">will erode</a>. That’s even as companies like PrismML work towards slimming down full-weight models so they don’t need to run on a server at all. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“It’s going to be wild when people have unlimited tokens on their desks,” said Calacanis in a podcast round table discussion.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Who has the most to lose?</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The current incarnations of AI felt like they came from nowhere. Most people weren’t aware of the technology until returning to work after the 2022 holiday season. Since then, the industry has proliferated with dozens of competing models, most recently including powerful but affordable frontier models such as Qwen and Kimi.ai.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These models aren’t necessarily all as good as one another, but in many cases for much of what we do, we’ll find them to be good enough. That’s an existential crisis for some, as industry observers now think the inevitable pricing pressure means some services might have over-invested in capacity before finding any way to turn a profit.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Those profit-seeking services are the ones with the most to lose as Apple extends its hardware advantage, democratizing AI access for all while providing platforms suitable for edge AI, on-premises AI, private AI, and even AI access using third-party services. (The need for the latter will shrink as the capabilities of the former get better.)</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Cupertino rising</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What does this all mean? While the industry remains young, it is already fragmenting. And striding through the dust of that process comes Apple, equipped with the hardware, software, and approach to build its business even as the enterprise of first mover AI services erodes. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>You can follow me on social media! Join me on <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/jonnyevanssays.bsky.social" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">BlueSky</a>,  <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/jonnyevans" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">LinkedIn</a>, <a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/@jonnyevans" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Mastodon</a> and subscribe to my daily Apple-related news summaries at <a href="https://thecorenews.substack.com/p/welcome-to-the-core?r=5l3lg" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Core</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The June 2026 Security Update Review]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I’ve made it through Pwn2Own Berlin, had a little vacation, and now I’m back for Patch Tuesday. Microsoft and Adobe didn’t disappoint. In fact, they have heralded my return with the largest Patch Tuesday release ever. Thanks? Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities and let’s take a ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694563/hacking/the-june-2026-security-update-review/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694563/hacking/the-june-2026-security-update-review/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:02:53 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="">I’ve made it through Pwn2Own Berlin, had a little vacation, and now I’m back for Patch Tuesday. Microsoft and Adobe didn’t disappoint. In fact, they have heralded my return with the largest Patch Tuesday release ever. Thanks? Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities and let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft. If you’d rather watch the full video recap covering the entire release, you can check it out here:</p>





















  
  




  
















  
    
      
    
    
      
        
      
    
    
    



  






  <p class=""><strong>Adobe Patches for June 2026</strong></p><p class="">For June, Adobe released 11 bulletins addressing 123 unique CVEs in Adobe Acrobat Reader, ColdFusion, Experience Manager, Experience Manager Forms, InDesign, InCopy, Substance 3D Sampler, Content Credentials SDK, Dreamweaver, Format Plugins, and Adobe Campaign Classic. A total of 11 of these CVEs were reported through the ZDI program.</p><p class="">Here’s this month’s overview table:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    


<table>
<colgroup>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
</colgroup>
<thead>
  <tr>
    <th>Bulletin ID</th>
    <th>Product</th>
    <th>CVE Count</th>
    <th>Highest Severity</th>
    <th>Highest CVSS</th>
    <th>Exploited</th>
    <th>Deployment Priority</th>
  </tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/campaign/apsb26-66.html" target="_blank">APSB26-66</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Campaign Classic</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>10.0</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>1</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/coldfusion/apsb26-64.html" target="_blank">APSB26-64</a></td>
    <td>Adobe ColdFusion</td>
    <td>7</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>1</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/acrobat/apsb26-63.html" target="_blank">APSB26-63</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Acrobat Reader</td>
    <td>20</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>2</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/aem-forms/apsb26-57.html" target="_blank">APSB26-57</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Experience Manager Forms</td>
    <td>3</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.3</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>2</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/dreamweaver/apsb26-62.html" target="_blank">APSB26-62</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Dreamweaver</td>
    <td>5</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/formatplugins/apsb26-65.html" target="_blank">APSB26-65</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Format Plugins</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/incopy/apsb26-59.html" target="_blank">APSB26-59</a></td>
    <td>Adobe InCopy</td>
    <td>3</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/indesign/apsb26-58.html" target="_blank">APSB26-58</a></td>
    <td>Adobe InDesign</td>
    <td>12</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d-sampler/apsb26-60.html" target="_blank">APSB26-60</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Substance 3D Sampler</td>
    <td>4</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/content-authenticity-sdk/apsb26-61.html" target="_blank">APSB26-61</a></td>
    <td>Content Credentials SDK</td>
    <td>8</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.5</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/experience-manager/apsb26-56.html" target="_blank">APSB26-56</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Experience Manager</td>
    <td>57</td>
    <td>Important</td>
    <td>5.4</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
  <tr>
    <td>TOTAL</td>
    <td>11 bulletins</td>
    <td>123</td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
  </tr>
</tfoot>
</table>



  
  









  <p class="">Obviously, the update for Campaign Classic should be on the top of your deployment list if you’re a user. A CVSS 10 is rare; two in the same bulletin is pretty much a unicorn. Adobe says there are no active attacks, but I would expect heavy research into creating one. The update for Coldfusion is also a Priority 1, but again, no known attacks is the wild. I suspect the Reader patch will also receive a lot of attention as malicious PDFs are common in ransomware attacks. The update for Experience Manager may be large, but it’s mostly just cross-site scripting (XSS) bugs.</p><p class=""><strong>Microsoft Patches for June 2026</strong></p><p class="">This month, Microsoft released a new record 208 CVEs Windows and Windows components, Office and Office Components, Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based), Azure, .NET and Visual Studio, Github Copilot, Defender, Exchange Server, Hyper-V, Secure Boot, and BitLocker. At least, that’s my count. Microsoft’s tools seem to be having some issues, as they initially included a CVE from 2020 in this release. Regardless, the count is over 200, and I counted several times.</p><p class="">One of these bugs came through the ZDI program, but bugs submitted during Pwn2Own Berlin remain unpatched. If you include the Chromium and other third-party bugs, the total CVE count for June comes to a staggering 571 CVEs. 38 of these cases are rated Critical while the rest are rated Important in severity.</p><p class="">I’ve been counting CVEs on Patch Tuesday since 2017, and this is by far the largest monthly release in that time. The previous record was 177 set last year. It is extraordinary that Microsoft can produce so many patches in a single month, but it does raise concerns. How many of these cases were found using AI tools? How many patches were generated using AI to assist in coding or testing? What quality issues may exist in these patches? And likely most importantly, is this the new normal? The last two months were also large releases. Should sysadmins adjust their processes for prioritization and patch deployment based on this new volume of updates? Unfortunately, Microsoft is not providing those answers right now. Hopefully that changes in the future. BTW – just a note – the current number of CVEs shipped by Microsoft this year exceeds the total number of CVEs shipped in all of 2018.</p><p class="">One of the bugs patched by Microsoft this month is listed as under active exploitation and three others are listed as publicly known at the time of release. Let’s take a closer look at some of the more interesting updates for this month, starting with the bug being exploited in the wild.</p><p class="">-   <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41091"><strong>CVE-2026-41091</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Defender Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>Since Microsoft doesn’t provide info on how widespread exploitation is, we must read some tea leaves. For this patch, several different people were acknowledged, which indicates multiple parties say this is in the wild, meaning exploitation is likely significant. The good news is that most people won’t need to take action as Defender updates itself. However, if you don’t have this configured or are in an isolated environment, you’ll need to update to the latest version.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45657"><strong>CVE-2026-45657</strong></a><strong> - Windows Kernel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>This CVSS 9.8 bug allows remote, unauthenticated attackers to execute code at SYSTEM level without user interaction. Yup – this is wormable. The problem lies in the way the kernel handles TCP/IP. This was listed as “Exploitation Less Likely” by Microsoft, but rest assured that every researcher and bug shop on the planet is reversing this patch right now trying to create an exploit. Test and deploy this patch quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47291"><strong>CVE-2026-47291</strong></a><strong> - HTTP.sys Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>Our second CVSS 9.8 bug of the month, this also allows remote, unauthenticated attackers to execute code on affected systems without user interaction. However, there is a caveat. Systems using the default MaxRequestBytes registry value used by the Windows HTTP stack are not affected by this bug. You can edit your registry settings if you need protection while you test and deploy the patch. The bulletin includes instructions and even a PowerShell script for doing this action. Microsoft lists this as “Exploitation more likely”, so I would definitely check your registry settings.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44815"><strong>CVE-2026-44815</strong></a><strong> - DHCP Client Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>Here’s another CVSS 9.8 that has an odd incongruity. Although the CVSS says no permissions are required for exploitation, the write-up states it must be an “authenticated” user. I would err on the side of caution here and believe the CVSS. If that’s correct, then we have another bug where a remote, unauthenticated attacker could execute code on affected systems without user interaction. And since the DHCP client is on every OS, it’s a juicy target. This is another one to test and deploy with haste.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45585"><strong>CVE-2026-45585</strong></a><strong>/</strong><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50507"><strong>CVE-2026-50507</strong></a><strong> - Windows BitLocker Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability<br></strong>If you’ve followed the ongoing saga of Nightmare Eclipse vs. MSRC, the bugs should look familiar. One is definitely a fix for “YellowKey”, while the other appears to be a fix for “GreenPlasma”. The researcher has promised a “<a href="https://www.theregister.com/security/2026/05/28/microsoft-0-day-feud-escalates-as-researcher-threatens-another-windows-exploit-dump/5248085">bone shattering</a>” drop on June 14, so let’s hope Microsoft is able to reach some understanding with the researcher before more 0-days are released. Also, there is a script provided by Microsoft as a mitigation, but the better strategy is to test and deploy the updates.</p><p class=""> Here’s the full list of CVEs released by Microsoft for June 2026:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    





<link rel="File-List" href="new2026-Jun-cvrf2.fld/filelist.xml">













<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="1024">
 <col width="144">
 <col width="256">
 <col width="104" span="6">
 <tr height="47">
  <td width="144" class="xl65" height="47">CVE</td>
  <td width="256" class="xl65">Title</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Severity</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">CVSS</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Public</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Exploited</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">XI</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Type</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41091"><span>CVE-2026-41091</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Defender
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl71">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl71">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl70">0</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49160"><span>CVE-2026-49160</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">HTTP.sys Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl71">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50507"><span>CVE-2026-50507</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows BitLocker
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl71">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45586"><span>CVE-2026-45586</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Collaborative
  Translation Framework (CTFMON) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl71">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="91">
  <td class="xl67" height="91"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-10263"><span>CVE-2025-10263 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">ARM: CVE-2025-10263
  Completion of affected memory accesses might not be guaranteed by completion
  of a TLBI [kernel]</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48567"><span>CVE-2026-48567</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Azure HorizonDB<span>  </span>Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">10</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">N/A</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32193"><span>CVE-2026-32193</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Azure Kubernetes
  Service (AKS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47644"><span>CVE-2026-47644</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Copilot Chat
  (Microsoft Edge) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44815"><span>CVE-2026-44815</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">DHCP Client Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47291"><span>CVE-2026-47291</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">HTTP.sys Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42824"><span>CVE-2026-42824</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">M365 Copilot
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">N/A</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45476"><span>CVE-2026-45476</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Azure
  Network Adapter Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44810"><span>CVE-2026-44810</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft
  Cryptographic Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48579"><span>CVE-2026-48579</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Online Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">N/A</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47655"><span>CVE-2026-47655</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Graph
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">N/A</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45497"><span>CVE-2026-45497</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft M365 Copilot
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">N/A</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45460"><span>CVE-2026-45460</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45472"><span>CVE-2026-45472</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45474"><span>CVE-2026-45474</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45461"><span>CVE-2026-45461</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45463"><span>CVE-2026-45463</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45456"><span>CVE-2026-45456</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Outlook and
  Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45458"><span>CVE-2026-45458</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Outlook and
  Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47635"><span>CVE-2026-47635</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Outlook and
  Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26142"><span>CVE-2026-26142</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Nuance PowerScribe
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47289"><span>CVE-2026-47289</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47654"><span>CVE-2026-47654</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48563"><span>CVE-2026-48563</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42992"><span>CVE-2026-42992</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44799"><span>CVE-2026-44799</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44801"><span>CVE-2026-44801</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42985"><span>CVE-2026-42985</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45648"><span>CVE-2026-45648</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42987"><span>CVE-2026-42987</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Deployment
  Services (WDS) Remote Code Execution</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33828"><span>CVE-2026-33828</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Device Health
  Attestation (DHA) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44803"><span>CVE-2026-44803</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Graphics
  Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44812"><span>CVE-2026-44812</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Graphics
  Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45607"><span>CVE-2026-45607</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Hyper-V Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45641"><span>CVE-2026-45641</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Hyper-V Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47652"><span>CVE-2026-47652</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Hyper-V Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47288"><span>CVE-2026-47288</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kerberos Key
  Distribution Center (KDC) Remote Code Execution</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45657"><span>CVE-2026-45657</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kernel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48574"><span>CVE-2026-48574</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Media Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45490"><span>CVE-2026-45490</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">.NET SDK Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45491"><span>CVE-2026-45491</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">.NET Tampering
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45591"><span>CVE-2026-45591</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">ASP.NET Core Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47643"><span>CVE-2026-47643</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Azure Stack Edge
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41098"><span>CVE-2026-41098</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Azure Stack Edge
  Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45642"><span>CVE-2026-45642</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Azure
  Attestation service and Device Health Attestation Service Spoofing
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">3.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45650"><span>CVE-2026-45650</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Bing Search
  Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45637"><span>CVE-2026-45637</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45647"><span>CVE-2026-45647</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Defender for
  Endpoint for Mac Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40371"><span>CVE-2026-40371</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Dynamics 365
  (on-premises) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44822"><span>CVE-2026-44822</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45455"><span>CVE-2026-45455</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45469"><span>CVE-2026-45469</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44817"><span>CVE-2026-44817</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44818"><span>CVE-2026-44818</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44820"><span>CVE-2026-44820</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44823"><span>CVE-2026-44823</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45459"><span>CVE-2026-45459</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45504"><span>CVE-2026-45504</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45502"><span>CVE-2026-45502</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45503"><span>CVE-2026-45503</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45583"><span>CVE-2026-45583</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45500"><span>CVE-2026-45500</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45501"><span>CVE-2026-45501</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47631"><span>CVE-2026-47631</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42986"><span>CVE-2026-42986</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Graphics
  Component Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41092"><span>CVE-2026-41092</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Kinect
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45644"><span>CVE-2026-45644</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Live Share
  Canvas SDK Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47293"><span>CVE-2026-47293</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Click-To-Run Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45485"><span>CVE-2026-45485</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44821"><span>CVE-2026-44821</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45483"><span>CVE-2026-45483</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Project Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45475"><span>CVE-2026-45475</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44819"><span>CVE-2026-44819</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44824"><span>CVE-2026-44824</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45645"><span>CVE-2026-45645</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49161"><span>CVE-2026-49161</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft PC Manager
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42902"><span>CVE-2026-42902</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft PowerToys
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45484"><span>CVE-2026-45484</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45454"><span>CVE-2026-45454</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47298"><span>CVE-2026-47298</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45467"><span>CVE-2026-45467</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45468"><span>CVE-2026-45468</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45479"><span>CVE-2026-45479</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45453"><span>CVE-2026-45453</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47636"><span>CVE-2026-47636</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47637"><span>CVE-2026-47637</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47638"><span>CVE-2026-47638</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47639"><span>CVE-2026-47639</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47641"><span>CVE-2026-47641</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33113"><span>CVE-2026-33113</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45462"><span>CVE-2026-45462</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45464"><span>CVE-2026-45464</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45465"><span>CVE-2026-45465</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47634"><span>CVE-2026-47634</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47640"><span>CVE-2026-47640</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45481"><span>CVE-2026-45481</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48560"><span>CVE-2026-48560</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48562"><span>CVE-2026-48562</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42835"><span>CVE-2026-42835</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Teams for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45606"><span>CVE-2026-45606</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft UxTheme
  Library (uxtheme.dll) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45482"><span>CVE-2026-45482</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Visual
  Studio Code CoPilot Chat Extension Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45466"><span>CVE-2026-45466</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45471"><span>CVE-2026-45471</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45486"><span>CVE-2026-45486</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45643"><span>CVE-2026-45643</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45457"><span>CVE-2026-45457</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42980"><span>CVE-2026-42980</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">NT OS Kernel Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42916"><span>CVE-2026-42916</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">NT OS Kernel Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45649"><span>CVE-2026-45649</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Office for Android
  Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47653"><span>CVE-2026-47653</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42909"><span>CVE-2026-42909</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42913"><span>CVE-2026-42913</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42993"><span>CVE-2026-42993</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45588"><span>CVE-2026-45588</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48568"><span>CVE-2026-48568</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48570"><span>CVE-2026-48570</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48573"><span>CVE-2026-48573</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48575"><span>CVE-2026-48575</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48576"><span>CVE-2026-48576</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48578"><span>CVE-2026-48578</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45654"><span>CVE-2026-45654</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45656"><span>CVE-2026-45656</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">UEFI Secure Boot
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-8863"><span>CVE-2026-8863</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">UEFI Secure Boot
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40376"><span>CVE-2026-40376</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Visual Studio Code
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47281"><span>CVE-2026-47281</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Visual Studio Code
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47284"><span>CVE-2026-47284</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Visual Studio Code
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47292"><span>CVE-2026-47292</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Visual Studio Code
  MSSQL Extension Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48569"><span>CVE-2026-48569</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47287"><span>CVE-2026-47287</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Visual Studio Code
  Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42829"><span>CVE-2026-42829</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Administrator
  Protection Secure Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34335"><span>CVE-2026-34335</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45601"><span>CVE-2026-45601</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45598"><span>CVE-2026-45598</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45596"><span>CVE-2026-45596</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45638"><span>CVE-2026-45638</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45603"><span>CVE-2026-45603</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42911"><span>CVE-2026-42911</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45594"><span>CVE-2026-45594</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Application
  Identity (AppID) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45655"><span>CVE-2026-45655</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows BitLocker
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45658"><span>CVE-2026-45658</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows BitLocker
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45640"><span>CVE-2026-45640</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Bluetooth Port
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45605"><span>CVE-2026-45605</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Bluetooth
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47656"><span>CVE-2026-47656</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Boot Manager
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44809"><span>CVE-2026-44809</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Common Log
  File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45634"><span>CVE-2026-45634</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DHCP Client
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45608"><span>CVE-2026-45608</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DHCP Client
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41108"><span>CVE-2026-41108</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DNS Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42905"><span>CVE-2026-42905</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44811"><span>CVE-2026-44811</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44808"><span>CVE-2026-44808</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44807"><span>CVE-2026-44807</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42983"><span>CVE-2026-42983</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44802"><span>CVE-2026-44802</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44813"><span>CVE-2026-44813</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44804"><span>CVE-2026-44804</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48566"><span>CVE-2026-48566</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Information Disclosure<span> 
  </span>Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44814"><span>CVE-2026-44814</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Information Disclosure<span> 
  </span>Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45602"><span>CVE-2026-45602</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Dynamic Host
  Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42836"><span>CVE-2026-42836</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Function
  Discovery Service (fdwsd.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42910"><span>CVE-2026-42910</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Hotpatch
  Monitoring Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42972"><span>CVE-2026-42972</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Hyper-V
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45592"><span>CVE-2026-45592</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Internet
  (wininet.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42903"><span>CVE-2026-42903</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kerberos
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42914"><span>CVE-2026-42914</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kerberos
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48583"><span>CVE-2026-48583</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45653"><span>CVE-2026-45653</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42984"><span>CVE-2026-42984</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45600"><span>CVE-2026-45600</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kernel-Mode
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45604"><span>CVE-2026-45604</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Managed
  Installer Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45595"><span>CVE-2026-45595</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Mark of the
  Web Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45636"><span>CVE-2026-45636</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50508"><span>CVE-2026-50508</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows NTLM Spoofing
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48565"><span>CVE-2026-48565</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Narrator
  Braille Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44805"><span>CVE-2026-44805</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Network
  Controller (NC) Host Agent Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42981"><span>CVE-2026-42981</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Performance
  Monitor Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42974"><span>CVE-2026-42974</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Performance
  Monitor Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45487"><span>CVE-2026-45487</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Program
  Compatibility Assistant Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42828"><span>CVE-2026-42828</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Projected File
  System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42837"><span>CVE-2026-42837</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Projected File
  System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42969"><span>CVE-2026-42969</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42971"><span>CVE-2026-42971</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42970"><span>CVE-2026-42970</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42973"><span>CVE-2026-42973</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42978"><span>CVE-2026-42978</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42977"><span>CVE-2026-42977</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42979"><span>CVE-2026-42979</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42991"><span>CVE-2026-42991</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45639"><span>CVE-2026-45639</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42908"><span>CVE-2026-42908</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45593"><span>CVE-2026-45593</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows SDK Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42906"><span>CVE-2026-42906</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Shell
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42907"><span>CVE-2026-42907</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Shell
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47648"><span>CVE-2026-47648</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Storage
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42915"><span>CVE-2026-42915</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows TCP/IP Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42904"><span>CVE-2026-42904</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows TCP/IP
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42968"><span>CVE-2026-42968</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Telephony
  Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42912"><span>CVE-2026-42912</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Telephony
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45597"><span>CVE-2026-45597</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows UI Automation
  Manager (uiamanager.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45599"><span>CVE-2026-45599</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows UPnP Device
  Host Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45635"><span>CVE-2026-45635</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows UPnP Device
  Host Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40409"><span>CVE-2026-40409</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Universal Disk
  Format File System Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40404"><span>CVE-2026-40404</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Universal Disk
  Format File System Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42989"><span>CVE-2026-42989</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Winlogon
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![if supportMisalignedColumns]&gt;
 <tr height="0">
  <td width="144"></td>
  <td width="256"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![endif]&gt;
</table>











  
  









  <p class=""><em>* Indicates this CVE had been released by a third party and is now being included in Microsoft releases</em>.</p><p class=""><em>† Indicates further administrative actions are required to fully address the vulnerability.</em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class="">Looking at the other Critical-rated bugs in this release, the scariest-looking one is actually nothing to concern yourself with at all. The CVSS 10 bug in Azure HorizonDB has already been addressed by Microsoft and is just being documented now. That’s also the case for five others. Of course, there wouldn’t be a release without Office bugs that have the Preview Pane as an attack vector. There are multiple in June. There’s a handful of bugs in the Remote Desktop Client, but these rely on connecting to a malicious RDP server. There are three patches for Hyper-V that allow for guest-to-host code execution. The bug in Active Directory requires authentication, but any authenticated user can hit it. For the Windows Directory Service vulnerability, it needs to be listening for TFTP. You have blocked that everywhere, right? The bug in Azure Network Adapter is somewhat unique as you need to update your Linux kernel to be protected. The bug in Azure Kubernetes allows an attacker to break out of a container and gain control of the AKS worker node. Finally, the bug in the Kerberos Key Distribution Center (KDC) seems unlikely, but if exploited, it could allow authenticated attackers to get code execution on affected systems.</p><p class="">Moving on to the other code execution bugs, there are the ubiquitous open-an-own bugs in Office components like Excel and Word. The code injection bug in Exchange Server looks troubling, but it requires a machine-in-the-middle (MiTM), so exploitation is unlikely. The bugs in SharePoint require authentication, but you should note that the patch applies to both SharePoint Server 2016 and SharePoint Enterprise Server 2016. The two bugs in UPnP are interesting. Both can lead to code execution by causing an error during the handling of specially crafted data, which could lead to a Use After Free (UAF) bug. The bugs in RDP Client all require connecting to a malicious RDP server, but it’s not clear why some are rated Critical and some are rated Important. The NTFS vulnerability requires a user to mount a virtual hard drive on an affected system. The last RCE bug this month is in Azure Stack Edge and requires the attacker to send a specially crafted file upload request that includes a manipulated file name or path, leading to code execution.</p><p class="">There are more than 60 Elevation of Privilege (EoP) bugs in this month’s release, and as usual, most simply lead to local attackers executing their code at SYSTEM-level privileges or administrative privileges, so there’s not much to add without further technical details about the bugs themselves. A notable exception is in Exchange Server, where a user on Outlook Web Access (OWA) could gain access to other mailboxes. The bug in Visual Studio Code could allow attackers to gain permissions associated with the MCP Server’s managed identity. The bugs in Windows SDK and Windows UI Automation Manager could let attacker go from low integrity up to medium integrity code execution. The bug in Bluetooth just allows “elevated” privileges without really describing what elevated might be. </p><p class="">Moving on to the more than 20 security feature bypass (SFB) bugs in the June release, there are a total of 10 that impact Secure Boot. All carry scope change (S:C) in the CVSS, meaning successful exploitation affects security boundaries beyond the vulnerable component itself — specifically the ability to load untrusted code at boot, bypass Virtual Secure Mode, and undermine boot integrity guarantees. CVE-2026-45654 explicitly calls out VSM exposure. The bulk of these are credited to Alon Leviev (STORM), which is notable given his prior BootKitty/BlackLotus-adjacent research. The bugs in the Windows Boot Manager have a similar impact as the Secure Boot bugs. The UEFI Secure Boot vulnerabilities go a layer deeper. They require either local admin or physical access but could allow for the running of untrusted code even before the OS loads. Rootkits anyone? The four bugs in BitLocker all require physical access but could yield encrypted data if exploited. The bug in Windows Administration Protection allows attackers to bypass the feature that prevents standard-user apps from performing admin-level actions. The bug in Visual Studio Copilot Chat could be the most interesting non-boot bug here as it allows authentication impersonation. Mark of the Web (MotW) and Excel vulns could bypass user warnings. Lastly, the bug in PC Manager bypasses expected user controls. </p><p class="">Turning our attention to the mass of spoofing bugs in the release, we instantly see 18 impacting SharePoint Server. Fortunately, these are simply cross-site scripting (XSS) bugs. It’s the Exchange bugs we should really watch for. One is an XSS that an attacker can exploit by convincing an Exchange administrator to open a malicious link or message, which then runs code in the admin's web session. That's a meaningful privilege escalation path. Another is listed as an SSRF-based attack, but no other details are available. The last is a lower-impact XSS with limited confidentiality/integrity loss. The bug in Bing Search (remember Bing?) is a classic search result spoofing. The bug in Azure Stack Edge is interesting as it could allow access to resources outside the vulnerable component's security boundary. The bug in Office for Android requires user interaction. The Office Project Server bug is an authenticated XSS with low impact. The final spoofing bug is in Azure Attestation but has already been addressed. You should still verify you are protected by following the instructions in the write-up from Microsoft.</p><p class="">There are 30 different information disclosure bugs in this release, and fortunately, the vast majority of these simply result in info leaks consisting of unspecified memory contents or memory addresses. The two bugs in Visual Studio require user interaction and could “disclose information over a network.” How obtuse. The bug in GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Code could disclose discloses a sign-in access token for a user's work account. That's a meaningful credential exposure, not just random memory. That leaves the two bugs in Exchange Server. One could allow an authenticated user to gain information about which network services that the Exchange server can reach. The other sounds much like the spoofing bug in OWA as it allows attackers to see information in mailboxes they should not have access to.</p><p class="">I’ve never been a fan of the “tampering” category, as it could mean so many different things. For example, the bug in .NET simply says it could allow an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering locally. Similarly, the bug in Visual Studio says the same, expect here the tampering occurs over a network. Microsoft doesn’t even bother with a CWE for the tampering bug in the DHCP Server, so your guess is as good as mine.</p><p class="">There are seven DoS bugs in the June release, and as usual, Microsoft provides little to no actionable information about the vulnerabilities. The most interesting is the bug in HTTP.sys, which is listed as publicly known. This is an uncontrolled resource consumption, rated "Exploitation More Likely," and publicly disclosed. Since, HTTP.sys sits at the core of IIS and Windows web services, a network-accessible DoS here can take down any Windows server running HTTP-based services. Based on the Acknowledgement, it looks like this bug may have been found using AI. There are no real details for the other bugs, but based simply on the impact, I would focus on the Kerberos and TCP/IP bugs if you had to prioritize.</p><p class="">No new advisories are being released this month.</p><p class=""><strong>Looking Ahead</strong></p><p class="">The next Patch Tuesday will be on July 14 and will be the last one before Black Hat/DEFCON. It’s usually a big release, so strap in and hang on. I’ll be back then to give you my full thoughts. Until then, stay safe, happy patching, and may all your reboots be smooth and clean!</p><p class=""> </p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The July 2026 Security Update Review]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Well folks. Here we are. The bug apocalypse has fully descended upon us. I’ll do my best to sort this out in some way meaningful, but this month’s release shows us the nay-sayers were right, and I’ve got to hand it to the nay-sayers here. Excellent call. Take an extended break from your regularly...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694560/hacking/the-july-2026-security-update-review/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694560/hacking/the-july-2026-security-update-review/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:02:51 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="">Well folks. Here we are. The bug apocalypse has fully descended upon us. I’ll do my best to sort this out in some way meaningful, but this month’s release shows us the nay-sayers were right, and I’ve got to hand it to the nay-sayers here. Excellent call. Take an extended break from your regularly scheduled activities as we let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft. If you’d rather watch the full video recap covering the entire release, you can check it out here:</p>





















  
  




  
















  
    
      
    
    
      
        
      
    
    
    



  






  <p class=""><strong>Adobe Patches for July 2026</strong></p><p class="">Adobe has now moved to a bimonthly release schedule, which means they will be releasing patches on the second and fourth Tuesdays of the month. I’ll continue to cover the second Tuesday release here and update this blog should the fourth Tuesday release contain anything significant. I think this is a smart way to break up a monster release into something a bit more manageable. Apple has said they are taking a similar approach. We’ll see if other vendors follow their lead.</p><p class="">For the first part of the July release, Adobe released 12 bulletins addressing 88 unique CVEs in Adobe ColdFusion, Commerce, After Effects, Animate, Audition, Bridge, Creative Cloud Desktop Application, Experience Manager, Illustrator, Media Encoder, Premiere Pro, and the Content Credentials SDK.</p><p class="">Here’s this month’s overview table:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    


<table>
<colgroup>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
</colgroup>
<thead>
  <tr>
    <th>Bulletin ID</th>
    <th>Product</th>
    <th>CVE Count</th>
    <th>Highest Severity</th>
    <th>Highest CVSS</th>
    <th>Exploited</th>
    <th>Deployment Priority</th>
  </tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/coldfusion/apsb26-82.html" target="_blank">APSB26-82</a></td>
    <td>Adobe ColdFusion</td>
    <td>13</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.9</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>1</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/magento/apsb26-73.html" target="_blank">APSB26-73</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Commerce</td>
    <td>13</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>2</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/after_effects/apsb26-78.html" target="_blank">APSB26-78</a></td>
    <td>Adobe After Effects</td>
    <td>3</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/animate/apsb26-83.html" target="_blank">APSB26-83</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Animate</td>
    <td>6</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/audition/apsb26-71.html" target="_blank">APSB26-71</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Audition</td>
    <td>6</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/bridge/apsb26-81.html" target="_blank">APSB26-81</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Bridge</td>
    <td>6</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/creative-cloud/apsb26-77.html" target="_blank">APSB26-77</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Creative Cloud Desktop Application</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.1</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/experience-manager/apsb26-74.html" target="_blank">APSB26-74</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Experience Manager</td>
    <td>13</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/illustrator/apsb26-79.html" target="_blank">APSB26-79</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Illustrator</td>
    <td>5</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.3</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/media-encoder/apsb26-72.html" target="_blank">APSB26-72</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Media Encoder</td>
    <td>5</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/premiere_pro/apsb26-76.html" target="_blank">APSB26-76</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Premiere Pro</td>
    <td>4</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/content-authenticity-sdk/apsb26-80.html" target="_blank">APSB26-80</a></td>
    <td>Content Credentials SDK</td>
    <td>12</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.2</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
  <tr>
    <td>TOTAL</td>
    <td>12 bulletins</td>
    <td>88</td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
  </tr>
</tfoot>
</table>



  
  









  <p class="">While nothing is under active exploit, I would prioritize the Cold Fusion and Commerce patches first. The patch for Cold Fusion even clocks in with a CVSS 9.9 bug. Beyond that, most of these updates are pretty straightforward. If you’re using these products, patch them. However, you can use you regular patch cadence here. </p><p class=""><strong>Microsoft Patches for July 2026</strong></p><p class="">Here it is. The Mother of All Releases. To call this record-breaking is an understatement. How to count this mess is anyone’s guess, but I see new Microsoft 621 CVEs for the month of July. Some of these are in online services where no user action is required. They also list about 480 bugs in Chromium and Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) that I won’t cover here. Here’s how I put this in context. I looked at the last 20 years of Microsoft releases. The CVE count year-to-date exceeds all other years’ totals.</p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
              
              
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png" data-image-dimensions="2158x1150" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=1000w" width="2158" height="1150" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
            
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  





  <p class="">The products covered this month are also astonishing. There are patches for Windows and Windows components, Office and Office Components, Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based), Azure, .NET and Visual Studio, Github Copilot, Defender, Exchange Server, Hyper-V, Ages of Empire II, and Minecraft Server (really!). That phrase “Windows components” does some pretty heavy lifting here, too, as just about everything you’ve ever heard of is getting patched. All told, there are 63 rated Critical, six rated Moderate, one rated Low, with the rest rated Important in severity. Eight of these bugs were submitted through the ZDI program (more on that later). Two CVEs are listed as under active exploit while one other is listed as publicly known.</p><p class="">So how do we eat this elephant? One byte at a time (pun intended). Let’s start by looking a closer look at some of the more interesting updates for this month, starting with the bugs being exploited in the wild.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56155"><strong>CVE-2026-56155</strong></a><strong> - Active Directory Federation Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>This is one of several AD FS being patched this month, but it’s the only one being actively exploited. It stems from insufficient access-control granularity and does require local access and low privileges to start, but AD FS is exactly the kind of identity infrastructure attackers love to pivot through once they're in. It can also be paired with an RCE as we often see in ransomware. Test and deploy this patch quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56154"><strong>CVE-2026-56164</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft SharePoint Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>The other bug being exploited in the wild this month is a modest CVSS 5.3 – but it shows why Moderate severity bugs still matter. It's a missing-authentication flaw, meaning an unauthenticated attacker can hit it over the network with no user interaction required. When something this reachable is being actively abused, patch it now and worry about the score later.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57092"><strong>CVE-2026-57092</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Windows VMSwitch Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>This patch rates the highest CVSS score for the month: a solid 9.9. It’s a use-after-free that lets a low-privileged attacker escalate to full host compromise across a VM boundary. We saw something like this demonstrated at Pwn2Own Berlin on ESXi, but it clearly isn’t alone. If you’re using VMSwitch in your Hyper-V deployments (and you likely are), test and deploy this one quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50522"><strong>CVE-2026-50522</strong></a><strong>/</strong><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58644"><strong>58644</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft SharePoint Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>This matching pair of CVSS 9.8 bugs results from the deserialization-of-untrusted-data and are reachable without authentication or user interaction. CVE-2026-50522 was demonstrated during <a href="https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/blog/2026/5/16/pwn2own-berlin-2026-day-three-results-and-master-of-pwn">Pwn2Own Berlin</a>, so it’s odd to see Microsoft list it as “Exploit Maturity Unknown” since we literally handed them a working exploit. Just another reason to do your own risk assessment and not rely 100% on the vendor. If you have any Internet accessible SharePoint servers, test and deploy this patch quickly. </p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56190"><strong>CVE-2026-56190</strong></a><strong> - Remote Desktop Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</strong><br> This patch covers an unauthenticated, network-reachable, no user interaction required bug. The root cause is a classic one: use of uninitialized resource (CWE-908), meaning specially crafted RDP traffic can interact with memory that was never properly initialized, letting an attacker corrupt memory and potentially steer code execution. RDP Servers are a common target, so audit your systems to see which are internet accessible and start from there. </p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55008"><strong>CVE-2026-55008</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Exchange Server Spoofing Vulnerability<br></strong>Ignore the title here and treat this like the XSS bug it is. The vulnerability is listed as a CVSS 9.6 since it’s a stored cross-site scripting flaw in Outlook Web Access, with a scope-changed impact that lets it break out of the web app context entirely. An attacker sends a specially crafted email, and if the victim simply opens it in OWA, arbitrary JavaScript executes in their browser session — no attachment needed, no macro warning, just viewing the message does it. If you’re using OWA, test and deploy this one quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50518"><strong>CVE-2026-50518</strong></a><strong> - Windows DHCP Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>There are a couple of these DHCP RCE patches in this release, but the other has caveats while this one does not. Both are heap-based buffer overflows scoring CVSS 9.8, both unauthenticated and network-reachable. If you're running DHCP Server role on anything Internet-adjacent (you're not, right?), these move to the top of the list.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56188"><strong>CVE-2026-56188</strong></a><strong> - Windows Server Network driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>Another Critical-rated bug, this one is caused by a race condition. It’s always fun to see a TOCTOU bug rated this high, since race conditions are notoriously finicky to exploit reliably. While it may prove tricky to exploit, this bug could allow an attacker to execute privileged code over the network without user interaction. Don’t let the race condition lull you to sleep on a wormable bug.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55010"><strong>CVE-2026-55010</strong></a><strong> - Minecraft Bedrock Dedicated Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>File this in the “why not” category. This bug is a heap-based buffer overflow in Minecraft Bedrock Dedicated Server, also CVSS 9.8 and also unauthenticated RCE. Yes, your kid’s Minecraft server (it is your kid’s server, right?) is exposed to the same class of bug as your DHCP infrastructure. Patch it anyway.</p><p class="">Here’s the full list of CVEs released by Microsoft for July 2026:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    





<link rel="File-List" href="2026-Jul-cvrf.fld/filelist.xml">













<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="920">
 <col width="144">
 <col width="256">
 <col width="104" span="5">
 <tr height="47">
  <td width="144" class="xl65" height="47">CVE</td>
  <td width="256" class="xl65">Title</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Severity</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">CVSS</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Public</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Exploited</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Type</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56155"><span>CVE-2026-56155</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Federation Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56164"><span>CVE-2026-56164</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50661"><span>CVE-2026-50661</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows BitLocker
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54121"><span>CVE-2026-54121</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Certificate Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45499"><span>CVE-2026-45499 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure OpenAI Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48564"><span>CVE-2026-48564</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DHCP Server Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50370"><span>CVE-2026-50370</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DHCP Server Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56159"><span>CVE-2026-56159</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DHCP Server Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50382"><span>CVE-2026-50382</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41106"><span>CVE-2026-41106 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft 365 Copilot
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26145"><span>CVE-2026-26145 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Azure
  Synapse Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48561"><span>CVE-2026-48561</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Copilot
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55011"><span>CVE-2026-55011</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55012"><span>CVE-2026-55012</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="96">
  <td class="xl67" height="96"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55944"><span>CVE-2026-55944</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Dynamics NAV
  and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central (On Premises) Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57100"><span>CVE-2026-57100 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Entra
  Provisioning Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55041"><span>CVE-2026-55041</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54998"><span>CVE-2026-54998 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Online Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55008"><span>CVE-2026-55008</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54992"><span>CVE-2026-54992</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Message
  Queuing Queue Manager Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50314"><span>CVE-2026-50314</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50467"><span>CVE-2026-50467</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55018"><span>CVE-2026-55018</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55022"><span>CVE-2026-55022</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55045"><span>CVE-2026-55045</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55049"><span>CVE-2026-55049</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55129"><span>CVE-2026-55129</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55056"><span>CVE-2026-55056</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55140"><span>CVE-2026-55140</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55043"><span>CVE-2026-55043</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PowerPoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55123"><span>CVE-2026-55123</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PowerPoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55120"><span>CVE-2026-55120</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PowerPoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50522"><span>CVE-2026-50522</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58644"><span>CVE-2026-58644</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55040"><span>CVE-2026-55040</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54117"><span>CVE-2026-54117</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54118"><span>CVE-2026-54118</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50655"><span>CVE-2026-50655</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56189"><span>CVE-2026-56189</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57090"><span>CVE-2026-57090</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57094"><span>CVE-2026-57094</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57087"><span>CVE-2026-57087</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57092"><span>CVE-2026-57092</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  VMSwitch Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55033"><span>CVE-2026-55033</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55127"><span>CVE-2026-55127</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55132"><span>CVE-2026-55132</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55010"><span>CVE-2026-55010</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Minecraft Bedrock
  Dedicated Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50474"><span>CVE-2026-50474</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49164"><span>CVE-2026-49164</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54128"><span>CVE-2026-54128</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50518"><span>CVE-2026-50518</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49796"><span>CVE-2026-49796</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows GDI+ Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50380"><span>CVE-2026-50380</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows GDI+ Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54127"><span>CVE-2026-54127</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Hyper-V
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50680"><span>CVE-2026-50680</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Hyper-V
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50327"><span>CVE-2026-50327</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58542"><span>CVE-2026-58542</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58608"><span>CVE-2026-58608</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print Spooler
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54982"><span>CVE-2026-54982</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Reliable
  Multicast Transport Driver (RMCAST) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54995"><span>CVE-2026-54995</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Reliable
  Multicast Transport Driver (RMCAST) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42982"><span>CVE-2026-42982</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Kernel
  Mode Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50392"><span>CVE-2026-50392</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Kernel
  Mode Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50694"><span>CVE-2026-50694</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Socket
  Tunneling Protocol (SSTP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56188"><span>CVE-2026-56188</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Server Network
  driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50444"><span>CVE-2026-50444</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Server Update
  Service (WSUS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54999"><span>CVE-2026-54999</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows TCP/IP Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47302"><span>CVE-2026-47302</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Denial of Service
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50525"><span>CVE-2026-50525</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Denial of Service
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50651"><span>CVE-2026-50651</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Denial of Service
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57108"><span>CVE-2026-57108</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Denial of Service
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50524"><span>CVE-2026-50524</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50527"><span>CVE-2026-50527</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50648"><span>CVE-2026-50648</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50650"><span>CVE-2026-50650</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50646"><span>CVE-2026-50646</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50649"><span>CVE-2026-50649</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47304"><span>CVE-2026-47304</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Security Feature
  Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50528"><span>CVE-2026-50528</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Security Feature
  Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50659"><span>CVE-2026-50659</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Spoofing
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50526"><span>CVE-2026-50526</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Tampering
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50682"><span>CVE-2026-50682</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55001"><span>CVE-2026-55001</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Domain Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50647"><span>CVE-2026-50647</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Federation Server Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50684"><span>CVE-2026-50684</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Federation Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56170"><span>CVE-2026-56170</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">ASP.NET Core Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47300"><span>CVE-2026-47300</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">ASP.NET Core Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47303"><span>CVE-2026-47303</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">ASP.NET Core Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50652"><span>CVE-2026-50652</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure Active Directory
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50653"><span>CVE-2026-50653</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure Active Directory
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57969"><span>CVE-2026-57969</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure CycleCloud
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58279"><span>CVE-2026-58279</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure CycleCloud
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47632"><span>CVE-2026-47632</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure Monitor Agent
  Metrics Extension Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50338"><span>CVE-2026-50338</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure Spring Apps
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50488"><span>CVE-2026-50488</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Clipboard User Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50491"><span>CVE-2026-50491</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Code Integrity DLL
  (ci.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50381"><span>CVE-2026-50381</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Composite Image File
  System driver (cimfs.sys) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50427"><span>CVE-2026-50427</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Content Delivery
  Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50692"><span>CVE-2026-50692</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Desktop Window Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58633"><span>CVE-2026-58633</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Desktop Window Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58634"><span>CVE-2026-58634</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Desktop Window Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50296"><span>CVE-2026-50296</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50375"><span>CVE-2026-50375</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50353"><span>CVE-2026-50353</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50493"><span>CVE-2026-50493</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56643"><span>CVE-2026-56643</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56644"><span>CVE-2026-56644</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58629"><span>CVE-2026-58629</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49174"><span>CVE-2026-49174</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DNS Client Tampering
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50495"><span>CVE-2026-50495</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DNS Client Tampering
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57088"><span>CVE-2026-57088</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Extensible Storage
  Engine (ESENT) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50663"><span>CVE-2026-50663</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Game: Age of Empires
  II: Definitive Edition Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="72">
  <td class="xl67" height="72"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47282"><span>CVE-2026-47282</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">GitHub Copilot and
  Visual Studio Code Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41109"><span>CVE-2026-41109</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">GitHub Copilot and
  Visual Studio Code Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50510"><span>CVE-2026-50510</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">GitHub Copilot Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49787"><span>CVE-2026-49787</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">HTTP.sys Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50420"><span>CVE-2026-50420</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">HTTP.sys Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49788"><span>CVE-2026-49788</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">HTTP/2 Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50696"><span>CVE-2026-50696</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Internet Key Exchange
  (IKE) Protocol Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58617"><span>CVE-2026-58617</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">M365 Copilot for iOS
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58595"><span>CVE-2026-58595</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Bing App for
  IOS Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49162"><span>CVE-2026-49162</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50305"><span>CVE-2026-50305</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50361"><span>CVE-2026-50361</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50466"><span>CVE-2026-50466</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50458"><span>CVE-2026-50458</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="72">
  <td class="xl67" height="72"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50658"><span>CVE-2026-50658</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender for
  Endpoint for Mac Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="72">
  <td class="xl67" height="72"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56178"><span>CVE-2026-56178</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender for
  Endpoint for Mac Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50657"><span>CVE-2026-50657</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender for
  Endpoint for Mac Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50329"><span>CVE-2026-50329</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58541"><span>CVE-2026-58541</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58596"><span>CVE-2026-58596</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57991"><span>CVE-2026-57991</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58291"><span>CVE-2026-58291</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57981"><span>CVE-2026-57981</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57984"><span>CVE-2026-57984</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57985"><span>CVE-2026-57985</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57986"><span>CVE-2026-57986</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57988"><span>CVE-2026-57988</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57992"><span>CVE-2026-57992</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58276"><span>CVE-2026-58276</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56645"><span>CVE-2026-56645</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57974"><span>CVE-2026-57974</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57975"><span>CVE-2026-57975</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58281"><span>CVE-2026-58281</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58284"><span>CVE-2026-58284</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58285"><span>CVE-2026-58285</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58287"><span>CVE-2026-58287</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58288"><span>CVE-2026-58288</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58289"><span>CVE-2026-58289</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58290"><span>CVE-2026-58290</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58292"><span>CVE-2026-58292</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58293"><span>CVE-2026-58293</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58294"><span>CVE-2026-58294</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57983"><span>CVE-2026-57983</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58295"><span>CVE-2026-58295</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58525"><span>CVE-2026-58525</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57987"><span>CVE-2026-57987</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58278"><span>CVE-2026-58278</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56646"><span>CVE-2026-56646</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57977"><span>CVE-2026-57977</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57993"><span>CVE-2026-57993</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58282"><span>CVE-2026-58282</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58283"><span>CVE-2026-58283</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58286"><span>CVE-2026-58286</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58298"><span>CVE-2026-58298</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58524"><span>CVE-2026-58524</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58296"><span>CVE-2026-58296</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58297"><span>CVE-2026-58297</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58300"><span>CVE-2026-58300</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58522"><span>CVE-2026-58522</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58299"><span>CVE-2026-58299</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58523"><span>CVE-2026-58523</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50678"><span>CVE-2026-50678</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54988"><span>CVE-2026-54988</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48580"><span>CVE-2026-48580</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50408"><span>CVE-2026-50408</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55046"><span>CVE-2026-55046</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55138"><span>CVE-2026-55138</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55054"><span>CVE-2026-55054</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55122"><span>CVE-2026-55122</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55898"><span>CVE-2026-55898</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50675"><span>CVE-2026-50675</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55899"><span>CVE-2026-55899</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55948"><span>CVE-2026-55948</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58618"><span>CVE-2026-58618</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47642"><span>CVE-2026-47642</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55024"><span>CVE-2026-55024</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55025"><span>CVE-2026-55025</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55031"><span>CVE-2026-55031</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55048"><span>CVE-2026-55048</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55029"><span>CVE-2026-55029</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55039"><span>CVE-2026-55039</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55136"><span>CVE-2026-55136</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55141"><span>CVE-2026-55141</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55036"><span>CVE-2026-55036</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55044"><span>CVE-2026-55044</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55037"><span>CVE-2026-55037</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55058"><span>CVE-2026-55058</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55137"><span>CVE-2026-55137</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55053"><span>CVE-2026-55053</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55131"><span>CVE-2026-55131</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54131"><span>CVE-2026-54131</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55947"><span>CVE-2026-55947</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55949"><span>CVE-2026-55949</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56156"><span>CVE-2026-56156</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55006"><span>CVE-2026-55006</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55009"><span>CVE-2026-55009</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55005"><span>CVE-2026-55005</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56642"><span>CVE-2026-56642</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Fabric Data
  Warehouse Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50343"><span>CVE-2026-50343</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Install
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50439"><span>CVE-2026-50439</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Message
  Queuing Queue Manager Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58537"><span>CVE-2026-58537</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft NAT Helper
  Components (ipnathlp.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56193"><span>CVE-2026-56193</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55023"><span>CVE-2026-55023</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55026"><span>CVE-2026-55026</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55027"><span>CVE-2026-55027</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55028"><span>CVE-2026-55028</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55047"><span>CVE-2026-55047</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55035"><span>CVE-2026-55035</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55057"><span>CVE-2026-55057</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl75" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55121"><span>CVE-2026-55121</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55042"><span>CVE-2026-55042</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55139"><span>CVE-2026-55139</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50665"><span>CVE-2026-50665</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56192"><span>CVE-2026-56192</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56195"><span>CVE-2026-56195</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47290"><span>CVE-2026-47290</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50301"><span>CVE-2026-50301</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55017"><span>CVE-2026-55017</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55125"><span>CVE-2026-55125</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55133"><span>CVE-2026-55133</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft OneNote
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58636"><span>CVE-2026-58636</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PC Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50438"><span>CVE-2026-50438</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PC Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58647"><span>CVE-2026-58647</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PowerBI
  Report Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55052"><span>CVE-2026-55052</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58277"><span>CVE-2026-58277</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55051"><span>CVE-2026-55051</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54108"><span>CVE-2026-54108</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55016"><span>CVE-2026-55016</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55019"><span>CVE-2026-55019</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55020"><span>CVE-2026-55020</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55021"><span>CVE-2026-55021</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55030"><span>CVE-2026-55030</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55034"><span>CVE-2026-55034</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55126"><span>CVE-2026-55126</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55135"><span>CVE-2026-55135</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56157"><span>CVE-2026-56157</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47296"><span>CVE-2026-47296</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55002"><span>CVE-2026-55002</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47295"><span>CVE-2026-47295</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50468"><span>CVE-2026-50468</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54116"><span>CVE-2026-54116</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42900"><span>CVE-2026-42900</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows App
  Store Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49784"><span>CVE-2026-49784</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows App
  Store Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50356"><span>CVE-2026-50356</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows App
  Store Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49165"><span>CVE-2026-49165</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows App
  Store Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54993"><span>CVE-2026-54993</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58610"><span>CVE-2026-58610</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55050"><span>CVE-2026-55050</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55124"><span>CVE-2026-55124</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55142"><span>CVE-2026-55142</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55032"><span>CVE-2026-55032</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55055"><span>CVE-2026-55055</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55038"><span>CVE-2026-55038</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55134"><span>CVE-2026-55134</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55128"><span>CVE-2026-55128</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55130"><span>CVE-2026-55130</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50359"><span>CVE-2026-50359</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft XML Core
  Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57097"><span>CVE-2026-57097</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft XML Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50346"><span>CVE-2026-50346</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Netlogon RPC Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50402"><span>CVE-2026-50402</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">NTFS Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50506"><span>CVE-2026-50506</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">OData for ASP.NET and
  ASP.NET Core Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45646"><span>CVE-2026-45646</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">OData for ASP.NET and
  ASP.NET Core Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54989"><span>CVE-2026-54989</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Quality Windows
  Audio/Video Experience (QWAVE) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50365"><span>CVE-2026-50365</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Access
  Management service/API (RPC server) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54990"><span>CVE-2026-54990</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58594"><span>CVE-2026-58594</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56190"><span>CVE-2026-56190</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Desktop
  Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49783"><span>CVE-2026-49783</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42990"><span>CVE-2026-42990</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">SQL Server ODBC driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49168"><span>CVE-2026-49168</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Storage Spaces Direct
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48581"><span>CVE-2026-48581</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Surface Broker SDMA
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49180"><span>CVE-2026-49180</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Universal Plug and
  Play (upnp.dll) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50455"><span>CVE-2026-50455</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Universal Plug and
  Play (upnp.dll) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54111"><span>CVE-2026-54111</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Universal Print
  Management Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58543"><span>CVE-2026-58543</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Universal Print
  Management Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58601"><span>CVE-2026-58601</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Virtual Hard Disk
  (VHD) Miniport Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulernability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50520"><span>CVE-2026-50520</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Code
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45496"><span>CVE-2026-45496</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57101"><span>CVE-2026-57101</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57102"><span>CVE-2026-57102</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47305"><span>CVE-2026-47305</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49805"><span>CVE-2026-49805</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50297"><span>CVE-2026-50297</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50325"><span>CVE-2026-50325</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50489"><span>CVE-2026-50489</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57095"><span>CVE-2026-57095</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50416"><span>CVE-2026-50416</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56184"><span>CVE-2026-56184</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50432"><span>CVE-2026-50432</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Window Virtual
  Filtering Platform (VFP) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54119"><span>CVE-2026-54119</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57976"><span>CVE-2026-57976</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50366"><span>CVE-2026-50366</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49178"><span>CVE-2026-49178</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58529"><span>CVE-2026-58529</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services (ADFS) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54983"><span>CVE-2026-54983</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50695"><span>CVE-2026-50695</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50304"><span>CVE-2026-50304</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50368"><span>CVE-2026-50368</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50324"><span>CVE-2026-50324</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50355"><span>CVE-2026-50355</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50411"><span>CVE-2026-50411</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58631"><span>CVE-2026-58631</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  (WAC) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56196"><span>CVE-2026-56196</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  (WAC) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56197"><span>CVE-2026-56197</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  (WAC) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56169"><span>CVE-2026-56169</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57107"><span>CVE-2026-57107</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56185"><span>CVE-2026-56185</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50312"><span>CVE-2026-50312</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50462"><span>CVE-2026-50462</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57093"><span>CVE-2026-57093</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34346"><span>CVE-2026-34346</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48572"><span>CVE-2026-48572</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows App Package
  Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48571"><span>CVE-2026-48571</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows App Package
  Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50400"><span>CVE-2026-50400</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows App Package
  Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50331"><span>CVE-2026-50331</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Application
  Model Core API Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49803"><span>CVE-2026-49803</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows AppX
  Deployment Extensions Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50351"><span>CVE-2026-50351</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Audio
  Compression Manager (ACM) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50440"><span>CVE-2026-50440</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Audio Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34328"><span>CVE-2026-34328</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Audio Service
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50406"><span>CVE-2026-50406</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Backup Engine
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50364"><span>CVE-2026-50364</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Backup Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42975"><span>CVE-2026-42975</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Bluetooth Port
  Driver Remote Code Execution</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58538"><span>CVE-2026-58538</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Bluetooth
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58638"><span>CVE-2026-58638</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Boot Loader
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58637"><span>CVE-2026-58637</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Client-Side
  Caching Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50384"><span>CVE-2026-50384</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Clip Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49183"><span>CVE-2026-49183</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Clipboard
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50689"><span>CVE-2026-50689</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Clipboard
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50374"><span>CVE-2026-50374</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58536"><span>CVE-2026-58536</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58613"><span>CVE-2026-58613</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50401"><span>CVE-2026-50401</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50697"><span>CVE-2026-50697</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Common Log
  File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50667"><span>CVE-2026-50667</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Common Log
  File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50421"><span>CVE-2026-50421</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Connected User
  Experiences and Telemetry Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50428"><span>CVE-2026-50428</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Container
  Isolation FS Filter Driver (unionfs.sys) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50352"><span>CVE-2026-50352</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cryptographic
  Services Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50302"><span>CVE-2026-50302</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cryptographic
  Services Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55144"><span>CVE-2026-55144</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cryptography
  API: Next Generation (CNG) Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50347"><span>CVE-2026-50347</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Data.dll
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49181"><span>CVE-2026-49181</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50683"><span>CVE-2026-50683</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58627"><span>CVE-2026-58627</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Server
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50685"><span>CVE-2026-50685</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49807"><span>CVE-2026-49807</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DirectX
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49175"><span>CVE-2026-49175</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50487"><span>CVE-2026-50487</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50465"><span>CVE-2026-50465</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Client
  Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49169"><span>CVE-2026-49169</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50426"><span>CVE-2026-50426</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50424"><span>CVE-2026-50424</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Domain
  Controller Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50300"><span>CVE-2026-50300</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DWM Core
  Library Information Disclosure<span> 
  </span>Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50437"><span>CVE-2026-50437</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DWM Core
  Library Information Disclosure<span> 
  </span>Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34348"><span>CVE-2026-34348</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Event Logging
  Service Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50502"><span>CVE-2026-50502</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Event Logging
  Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33842"><span>CVE-2026-33842</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40422"><span>CVE-2026-40422</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41087"><span>CVE-2026-41087</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50473"><span>CVE-2026-50473</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50442"><span>CVE-2026-50442</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50389"><span>CVE-2026-50389</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50456"><span>CVE-2026-50456</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57084"><span>CVE-2026-57084</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57091"><span>CVE-2026-57091</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File History
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50405"><span>CVE-2026-50405</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Filtering
  Platform Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49172"><span>CVE-2026-49172</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows FTP Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50387"><span>CVE-2026-50387</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows GDI Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54122"><span>CVE-2026-54122</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows GDI+ Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50483"><span>CVE-2026-50483</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Graphics
  Component Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58609"><span>CVE-2026-58609</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Graphics
  Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50391"><span>CVE-2026-50391</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Group Policy
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50310"><span>CVE-2026-50310</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Human
  Interface Device Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50485"><span>CVE-2026-50485</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Hyper-V Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54129"><span>CVE-2026-54129</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Hyper-V
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50315"><span>CVE-2026-50315</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Image
  Acquisition Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58534"><span>CVE-2026-58534</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Input Method
  Editor (IME) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50490"><span>CVE-2026-50490</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Installer
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58540"><span>CVE-2026-58540</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Installer
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50425"><span>CVE-2026-50425</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Internal
  System User Profile Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50293"><span>CVE-2026-50293</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Internal Task
  Bar Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49167"><span>CVE-2026-49167</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49173"><span>CVE-2026-49173</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54132"><span>CVE-2026-54132</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49795"><span>CVE-2026-49795</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49798"><span>CVE-2026-49798</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49808"><span>CVE-2026-49808</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50354"><span>CVE-2026-50354</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50332"><span>CVE-2026-50332</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50377"><span>CVE-2026-50377</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50390"><span>CVE-2026-50390</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50423"><span>CVE-2026-50423</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50397"><span>CVE-2026-50397</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50436"><span>CVE-2026-50436</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50399"><span>CVE-2026-50399</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50459"><span>CVE-2026-50459</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50477"><span>CVE-2026-50477</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50478"><span>CVE-2026-50478</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50484"><span>CVE-2026-50484</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50673"><span>CVE-2026-50673</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58532"><span>CVE-2026-58532</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50294"><span>CVE-2026-50294</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50316"><span>CVE-2026-50316</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50419"><span>CVE-2026-50419</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50463"><span>CVE-2026-50463</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50475"><span>CVE-2026-50475</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50429"><span>CVE-2026-50429</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58614"><span>CVE-2026-58614</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58545"><span>CVE-2026-58545</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58602"><span>CVE-2026-58602</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel-Mode
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50393"><span>CVE-2026-50393</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel-Mode
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50396"><span>CVE-2026-50396</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel-Mode
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50378"><span>CVE-2026-50378</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Key Guard
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50303"><span>CVE-2026-50303</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Key Guard
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40378"><span>CVE-2026-40378</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Local Security
  Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49799"><span>CVE-2026-49799</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Local Security
  Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50371"><span>CVE-2026-50371</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows LUA File
  Virtualization Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58544"><span>CVE-2026-58544</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Management
  Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50404"><span>CVE-2026-50404</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50358"><span>CVE-2026-50358</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50336"><span>CVE-2026-50336</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50398"><span>CVE-2026-50398</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50414"><span>CVE-2026-50414</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50379"><span>CVE-2026-50379</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50433"><span>CVE-2026-50433</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50676"><span>CVE-2026-50676</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50677"><span>CVE-2026-50677</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34349"><span>CVE-2026-34349</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50394"><span>CVE-2026-50394</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50415"><span>CVE-2026-50415</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57083"><span>CVE-2026-57083</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media Photo
  Codec Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54115"><span>CVE-2026-54115</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Message
  Queuing (MSMQ) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50447"><span>CVE-2026-50447</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Message
  Queuing Service (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50505"><span>CVE-2026-50505</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Message
  Queuing Service (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50342"><span>CVE-2026-50342</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows MIDI Service
  Module Elevation of Privileges Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56183"><span>CVE-2026-56183</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows MIDI Service
  Module Elevation of Privileges Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56187"><span>CVE-2026-56187</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows MIDI Service
  Module Elevation of Privileges Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58635"><span>CVE-2026-58635</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Narrator
  Braille Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50500"><span>CVE-2026-50500</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Netlogon
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50476"><span>CVE-2026-50476</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network
  Connections Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50450"><span>CVE-2026-50450</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network
  Connections Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56650"><span>CVE-2026-56650</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network File
  System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56649"><span>CVE-2026-56649</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network File
  System Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50470"><span>CVE-2026-50470</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network Policy
  Server SNMP Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50496"><span>CVE-2026-50496</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network Policy
  Server SNMP Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56194"><span>CVE-2026-56194</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NFS Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56648"><span>CVE-2026-56648</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NFS Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50337"><span>CVE-2026-50337</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Notification
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49789"><span>CVE-2026-49789</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50412"><span>CVE-2026-50412</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50422"><span>CVE-2026-50422</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50672"><span>CVE-2026-50672</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56175"><span>CVE-2026-56175</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56182"><span>CVE-2026-56182</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50341"><span>CVE-2026-50341</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58640"><span>CVE-2026-58640</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49184"><span>CVE-2026-49184</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49797"><span>CVE-2026-49797</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50308"><span>CVE-2026-50308</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50386"><span>CVE-2026-50386</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50309"><span>CVE-2026-50309</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50313"><span>CVE-2026-50313</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50388"><span>CVE-2026-50388</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50448"><span>CVE-2026-50448</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50471"><span>CVE-2026-50471</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50461"><span>CVE-2026-50461</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50417"><span>CVE-2026-50417</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50482"><span>CVE-2026-50482</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50494"><span>CVE-2026-50494</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50344"><span>CVE-2026-50344</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows OLE Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50686"><span>CVE-2026-50686</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows OLE Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50335"><span>CVE-2026-50335</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Operating
  Systems Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50317"><span>CVE-2026-50317</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Operating
  Systems Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54987"><span>CVE-2026-54987</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Overlay Filter
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50435"><span>CVE-2026-50435</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Overlay Filter
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50409"><span>CVE-2026-50409</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Overlay Filter
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40400"><span>CVE-2026-40400</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows PowerShell
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49166"><span>CVE-2026-49166</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print
  Configuration Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55004"><span>CVE-2026-55004</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print
  Configuration Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50499"><span>CVE-2026-50499</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print Spooler
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50383"><span>CVE-2026-50383</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print Spooler
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57085"><span>CVE-2026-57085</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print Spooler
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50469"><span>CVE-2026-50469</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Projected File
  System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50434"><span>CVE-2026-50434</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50339"><span>CVE-2026-50339</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50430"><span>CVE-2026-50430</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50334"><span>CVE-2026-50334</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44800"><span>CVE-2026-44800</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50363"><span>CVE-2026-50363</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50431"><span>CVE-2026-50431</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Quality of
  Service (QoS) Packet Scheduler Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50372"><span>CVE-2026-50372</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Redirected
  Drive Buffering System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50666"><span>CVE-2026-50666</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Access
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56647"><span>CVE-2026-56647</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Access
  Service Infrastructure Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50330"><span>CVE-2026-50330</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50376"><span>CVE-2026-50376</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50504"><span>CVE-2026-50504</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58533"><span>CVE-2026-58533</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58535"><span>CVE-2026-58535</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58546"><span>CVE-2026-58546</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58539"><span>CVE-2026-58539</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55003"><span>CVE-2026-55003</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57979"><span>CVE-2026-57979</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50445"><span>CVE-2026-50445</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50497"><span>CVE-2026-50497</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54126"><span>CVE-2026-54126</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57982"><span>CVE-2026-57982</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50369"><span>CVE-2026-50369</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58626"><span>CVE-2026-58626</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55014"><span>CVE-2026-55014</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Help
  Defense Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50318"><span>CVE-2026-50318</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50407"><span>CVE-2026-50407</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50357"><span>CVE-2026-50357</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50441"><span>CVE-2026-50441</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50668"><span>CVE-2026-50668</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54109"><span>CVE-2026-54109</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49792"><span>CVE-2026-49792</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49793"><span>CVE-2026-49793</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50362"><span>CVE-2026-50362</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50492"><span>CVE-2026-50492</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50501"><span>CVE-2026-50501</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58530"><span>CVE-2026-58530</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49791"><span>CVE-2026-49791</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Routing and
  Remote Access Service (RRAS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50451"><span>CVE-2026-50451</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Routing and
  Remote Access Service (RRAS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57096"><span>CVE-2026-57096</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Routing and
  Remote Access Service (RRAS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50323"><span>CVE-2026-50323</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50452"><span>CVE-2026-50452</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50348"><span>CVE-2026-50348</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50345"><span>CVE-2026-50345</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50322"><span>CVE-2026-50322</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50340"><span>CVE-2026-50340</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50410"><span>CVE-2026-50410</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50449"><span>CVE-2026-50449</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50460"><span>CVE-2026-50460</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50403"><span>CVE-2026-50403</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50385"><span>CVE-2026-50385</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50413"><span>CVE-2026-50413</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50457"><span>CVE-2026-50457</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50486"><span>CVE-2026-50486</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50503"><span>CVE-2026-50503</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54125"><span>CVE-2026-54125</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58527"><span>CVE-2026-58527</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50373"><span>CVE-2026-50373</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Search Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50679"><span>CVE-2026-50679</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Search Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44806"><span>CVE-2026-44806</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Channel
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50681"><span>CVE-2026-50681</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Channel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56186"><span>CVE-2026-56186</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Channel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50367"><span>CVE-2026-50367</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Sensor Data
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58619"><span>CVE-2026-58619</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Sensor Data
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50311"><span>CVE-2026-50311</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50328"><span>CVE-2026-50328</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Server Update
  Service (WSUS) Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58531"><span>CVE-2026-58531</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54997"><span>CVE-2026-54997</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49801"><span>CVE-2026-49801</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50690"><span>CVE-2026-50690</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56168"><span>CVE-2026-56168</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB Server
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50360"><span>CVE-2026-50360</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57089"><span>CVE-2026-57089</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB Server
  Network Transport Driver (srvnet.sys) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50333"><span>CVE-2026-50333</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Spaceport.sys
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50298"><span>CVE-2026-50298</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Spaceport.sys
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49171"><span>CVE-2026-49171</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Speech Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49170"><span>CVE-2026-49170</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows
  StateRepository API Server file Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58526"><span>CVE-2026-58526</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Storage
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50299"><span>CVE-2026-50299</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Storage Spaces
  Direct Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57968"><span>CVE-2026-57968</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Subsystem for
  Linux (WSL2) Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57973"><span>CVE-2026-57973</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Subsystem for
  Linux (WSL2) Kernel Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50418"><span>CVE-2026-50418</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows System Secure
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50306"><span>CVE-2026-50306</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows TCP/IP
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50307"><span>CVE-2026-50307</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows TCP/IP
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49177"><span>CVE-2026-49177</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows TCP/IP
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50669"><span>CVE-2026-50669</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Telephony
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54124"><span>CVE-2026-54124</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Terminal
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50350"><span>CVE-2026-50350</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Trusted
  Runtime Interface Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50326"><span>CVE-2026-50326</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Unified
  Consent System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49790"><span>CVE-2026-49790</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Universal Disk
  Format File System Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50498"><span>CVE-2026-50498</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Universal Disk
  Format File System Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58547"><span>CVE-2026-58547</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Universal Plug
  and Play (UPnP) Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49794"><span>CVE-2026-49794</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Audio
  Class Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50453"><span>CVE-2026-50453</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Audio
  Class Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58528"><span>CVE-2026-58528</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Audio
  Class Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50321"><span>CVE-2026-50321</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50479"><span>CVE-2026-50479</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Hub Driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55000"><span>CVE-2026-55000</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54991"><span>CVE-2026-54991</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54996"><span>CVE-2026-54996</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49802"><span>CVE-2026-49802</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49806"><span>CVE-2026-49806</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50674"><span>CVE-2026-50674</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49804"><span>CVE-2026-49804</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Video
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50454"><span>CVE-2026-50454</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows User Interface
  Core Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49176"><span>CVE-2026-49176</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows WalletService
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49800"><span>CVE-2026-49800</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Web Proxy
  Auto-Discovery Protocol (WPAD) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50480"><span>CVE-2026-50480</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Web Proxy
  Auto-Discovery Protocol (WPAD) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56173"><span>CVE-2026-56173</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows WebView
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58632"><span>CVE-2026-58632</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32 Kernel
  Subsystem Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54107"><span>CVE-2026-54107</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54986"><span>CVE-2026-54986</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54112"><span>CVE-2026-54112</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54114"><span>CVE-2026-54114</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50670"><span>CVE-2026-50670</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50688"><span>CVE-2026-50688</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50687"><span>CVE-2026-50687</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56176"><span>CVE-2026-56176</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58628"><span>CVE-2026-58628</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Wireless
  Network Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50295"><span>CVE-2026-50295</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Zero Trust DNS
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50509"><span>CVE-2026-50509</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Wireless Wide Area
  Network Service (WwanSvc) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55945"><span>CVE-2026-55945</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45488"><span>CVE-2026-45488</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45489"><span>CVE-2026-45489</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55145"><span>CVE-2026-55145</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Outlook Copilot
  Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56181"><span>CVE-2026-56181</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network
  Address Translation (NAT) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58597"><span>CVE-2026-58597</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft
  Edge (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl73">Low</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![if supportMisalignedColumns]&gt;
 <tr height="0">
  <td width="144"></td>
  <td width="256"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![endif]&gt;
</table>











  
  









  <p class=""><em>** Indicates this CVEs has already been resolved by Microsoft, and no further action is needed by the end user.</em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class="">I’ll do my best to summarize everything else in this release, but no promises. I’m only human after all.</p><p class=""> </p><p class="">Looking at the remaining Critical-rated patches, Office is its own weather system: fourteen Word/Excel/PowerPoint/Office RCEs clustered at CVSS 7.8, plus five Windows Media Foundation RCEs. Outside of the Preview Pane attack vector, they are individually unremarkable; collectively, patch Office and reboot. Always reboot. We’ve already mentioned DHCP some, but DHCP Server can't catch a break. Beyond the one already covered, add CVE-2026-56159, CVE-2026-48564, CVE-2026-50370, and DHCP Client cousin CVE-2026-54128. Five DHCP RCEs in one release. Rounding things out, Print Spooler (CVE-2026-58608), Windows TCP/IP (CVE-2026-54999), and a SQL Server RCE pair (CVE-2026-54117/54118) all receive patches, and all are rated a CVSS 8.8. VE-2026-55944 (Dynamics NAV/Business Central On-Prem RCE, 9.8) is the same deserialization flavor as the SharePoint pair; it’s unauthenticated, network-reachable, and easy to overlook since it's not SharePoint. CVE-2026-48561 (Microsoft Copilot RCE, 9.6) and CVE-2026-50380 (Windows GDI+ RCE, 9.6) round out the near-top tier. Don't forget CVE-2026-55040, a SharePoint Security Feature Bypass (9.1) — patch it in the same pass as the SharePoint RCE pair since it's the same product family. Identity and infrastructure get hit too: CVE-2026-54121 (AD Certificate Services EoP, 8.8) and CVE-2026-50444 (WSUS EoP, 8.8). The obscure Reliable Multicast Transport Driver (RMCAST) takes two RCEs (CVE-2026-54982, CVE-2026-54995), and CVE-2026-50474 gives Remote Desktop Client its own RCE, separate from the RDP one already covered. The rest is a long tail: Defender RCE x2, GDI+ again, Windows Media x2, Secure Kernel Mode EoP x2, and a second Hyper-V EoP. You can consider these “normal” as far as patch cadence goes.</p><p class="">That leaves us with 95 RCE to discuss. I would explain, but there is too much, so let me sum up. CVE-2026-55944 (Dynamics NAV/Business Central On-Prem, 9.8) is the same deserialization flavor as the SharePoint pair: unauthenticated, easy to miss since it's not SharePoint. CVE-2026-54990 (Remote Desktop Client), CVE-2026-49172 (Windows FTP Service), and CVE-2026-50447 (MSMQ) all hit 9.8 too, proof severity labels lag CVSS sometimes. CVE-2026-48561 (Copilot) and CVE-2026-50380 (GDI+) sit at 9.6.</p><p class="">The pattern worth watching: 14 Windows NTFS and 7 ReFS RCEs/ That makes 21 filesystem-driver bugs, an unusually large cluster suggesting a shared root cause. Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) contributes 21 more that are genuinely Microsoft's to patch, not Chromium re-listing noise. Remote Desktop Client racks up a second and third RCE (CVE-2026-50474, CVE-2026-58594), and Windows Admin Center picks up two (CVE-2026-56196/56197) — WAC exposure keeps creeping into these releases. Exchange Server (CVE-2026-55005) and AD Domain Services (CVE-2026-49178) both land at 8.8.</p><p class="">And because this release wouldn't be complete without it: CVE-2026-50663, an RCE in Age of Empires II: Definitive Edition. Yes, really. Patch your civilization anyway.</p><p class="">There are close to 260 EoP bugs in this month’s release. Microsoft could have just published the EoPs and still had a record-setting month. As usual, most simply lead to local attackers executing their code at SYSTEM-level privileges or administrative privileges, so there’s not much to add without further technical details about the bugs themselves. What’s really frustrating is that 94 have no explicit privilege statement at all. Microsoft just says “elevate privileges” with no detail. By my count, that leaves around 25 bugs to consider. Some don’t elevate at all. The FAQ literally says the attacker just gets “the rights of the user running the affected application.” That covers Win32k, Clip Service, Search Service, MSMQ, and SharePoint. A few get a Low-to-Medium integrity bump. There are also a couple that lead to downgraded service accounts or arbitrary file deletion, but nothing else I’ve seen really stands out too much.</p><p class="">There are 20 Security Feature Bypass (SFB) bugs this month, and it's a genuinely mixed bag. CVE-2026-55040 leads at Critical, CVSS 9.1 as it’s weak authentication in SharePoint Server. Patch it in the same pass as the SharePoint RCE pair since it's the same product. The AI-coding-tool trend continues: GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Code and Visual Studio all land SFB bugs, mostly injection or path-traversal flavored. BitLocker is this month's lone publicly disclosed bug. It’s not exploited yet, but public disclosure is a countdown clock, not a free pass. It requires physical access, as does the bug in Microsoft XML. The firmware/boot cluster is worth a second look: Secure Boot, Boot Loader, and Key Guard all touch the trust chain below the OS. Meaning, despite a low CVSS score, “if this fails, nothing above it can be trusted” stakes. Rounding out the SFB patches, there are two .NET SFBs, two Windows Kernel SFBs, and a DNS/Cryptographic Services bringing up the rear.</p><p class="">The July release includes 31Spoofing bugs this month, and we’ve already covered the most important (Exchange). SharePoint Server accounts for another ten with almost all the same root cause: stored XSS letting an authenticated attacker spoof content in the browser. Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) contributes fifteen more spanning access-control failures, SSRF, type confusion, and UI misrepresentation. All genuinely Microsoft's to patch, not re-listed Chromium noise. The remaining six round out the usual suspects: a Windows NAT spoofing bug reachable from an adjacent network, a Bing app flaw on iOS, a PowerBI Report Server XSS issue, a .NET output-encoding bug, and an AD FS spoofing flaw. None publicly disclosed, none exploited, but with SharePoint's history this year, don't let "just Spoofing" lull you into deprioritizing the patch cycle.</p><p class="">Of 111 Information Disclosure bugs, the overwhelming majority of these simply result in info leaks consisting of unspecified memory contents or memory addresses. GitHub Copilot is the standout. Here, the bug insufficiently protected credentials, meaning actual secrets leak, not memory scraps. The Windows Admin Center flaw discloses data via improper authentication. A management console leaking to an unauthorized party is a bigger deal than it sounds. SharePoint uses SSRF to pull data server-side, and the Event Logging Service is a protection-mechanism failure, not a memory bug at all. Edge picks up three genuinely file-system-flavored disclosures — improper authorization, files/directories accessible to external parties, and link-following — plus Edge for Android exposing “private personal information” twice and two path-traversal bugs. The remaining 40+ are mostly one-line “exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor” entries scattered across File Explorer, Push Notifications, Cryptographic Services, and Win32k.</p><p class="">Only 8 Tampering bugs this month, the smallest bucket, but a couple stand out. The top of the list is a WSUS bug, caused by an uncaught exception that lets an unauthenticated attacker tamper with the update service over the network. That’s your patch-management infrastructure itself being the target, which always deserves extra attention. Windows CNG (the crypto API) picks up a missing-cryptographic-step flaw, and Windows DNS Client shows up three separate times across the list, twice for improper access control and once for missing authentication on a critical function. DNS resolution having this many tampering paths in one release is worth flagging as a pattern rather than three unrelated bugs. The one genuinely different entry is Outlook Copilot, described simply as vulnerable to “malicious uses” enabling tampering over the network. That’s a fantastically vague phrasing for an AI-assistant feature, continuing this year's running theme of Copilot-branded features showing up somewhere in every release. Finally, a .NET link-following bug and a WSL2 kernel race condition receive patches. Both require local/authorized access to trigger.</p><p class="">Still with me? Good, because we have 35 DoS bugs to cover, and this is really an identity-infrastructure story more than a grab-bag. Active Directory Federation Services alone accounts for seven of them, all sitting at CVSS 7.5, all stack-based buffer overflows or infinite loops that let an unauthenticated attacker knock the service over the network.  The .NET ecosystem is the other big cluster: .NET, .NET Framework, and ASP.NET Core/OData contribute nine bugs combined, almost all “allocation of resources without limits or throttling”.  HTTP.sys and HTTP/2 pick up the same flavor. LSASS shows up twice, which is always worth a second look given what that process actually holds. Rounding out the list are patches for Windows DHCP Server, SMB Server, Secure Channel, Hyper-V, and IKE Protocol each take a single hit, mostly requiring authorized or adjacent-network access rather than being wide open to the internet.</p><p class="">No new advisories are being released this month.</p><p class=""><strong>Looking Ahead</strong></p><p class="">The next Patch Tuesday will be on August 11, just after Hacker Summer Camp in sunny Las Vegas. Should I survive the heat, I’ll be back then to give you my full thoughts on the release – no matter how large it may be. Until then, stay safe, happy patching, and may all your reboots be smooth and clean!</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The March 2026 Security Update Review]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I am back in the friendly confines of the Mid-South headquarters of TrendAI ZDI (a.k.a. my home office), and am all set for the third patch Tuesday of 2026. Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities and let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft.If you’d...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694472/it-security-nachrichten/the-march-2026-security-update-review/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694472/it-security-nachrichten/the-march-2026-security-update-review/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:00:43 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="">I am back in the friendly confines of the Mid-South headquarters of TrendAI ZDI (a.k.a. my home office), and am all set for the third patch Tuesday of 2026. Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities and let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft.If you’d rather watch the full video recap covering the entire release, you can check it out here:</p>





















  
  




  
















  
    
      
    
    
      
        
      
    
    
    



  






  <p class=""><strong>Adobe Patches for March 2026</strong></p><p class="">For March, Adobe released eight bulletins addressing 80 unique CVEs in Adobe Acrobat Reader, Commerce, Illustrator, Substance 3D Painter, Premier Pro, Experience Manager, Substance 3D Stager, and the Adobe DNG Software Development Kit (SDK). Two of these bugs were submitted through the TrendAI ZDI program. If you need to prioritize, the update for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/acrobat/apsb26-26.html">Acrobat</a> likely has the most impact, with the patch fixing two Critical-rated and one Important bugs. The fix for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/experience-manager/apsb26-24.html">Experience Manager</a> is the largest this month with 33 CVEs addressed. However, these are simple cross-site scripting (XSS) bugs, so it’s not too exciting. The fix for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/magento/apsb26-05.html">Commerce</a> is also quite large with 19 CVEs. Most of these are also XSS bugs, but there’s a few security feature bypass bugs in there, too. Adobe actually gives this patch a deployment priority of 2, but it’s not under active attack at the time of release. </p><p class="">The fix for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/illustrator/apsb26-18.html">Illustrator</a> corrects seven bugs, including a few Critical-rated ones. The patch for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d_painter/apsb26-25.html">Substance 3D Painter</a> fixes nine different CVEs, all rated Important. That’s not the case for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d_stager/apsb26-29.html">Substance 3D Stager</a>, which fixes six different Critical bugs that could lead to arbitrary code execution. The patch for the <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/dng-sdk/apsb26-30.html">Adobe DNG Software Development Kit</a> (SDK) addresses one Critical and one Important bug. Finally, the update for Premiere Pro correct a single, Critical-rated bug that could lead to arbitrary code execution. </p><p class="">None of the bugs fixed by Adobe this month are listed as publicly known or under active attack at the time of release, and beyond the update for Commerce, all of the other updates released by Adobe this month are listed as deployment priority 3.</p><p class=""><strong>Microsoft Patches for March 2026</strong></p><p class="">This month, Microsoft released 84 new CVEs in Windows and Windows components, Office and Office Components, Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based), Azure, SQL Server, Hyper-V Server, and the Windows Resilient File System (ReFS). Counting the third-party and Chromium updates listed in the release, it brings to total number of CVEs to 94. Five of these bugs were reported through the TrendAI ZDI program. Eight of these bugs are rated Critical, and the rest are rated Important in severity.</p><p class="">This volume is relatively typical for a March release, and the lack of bugs under active attack is a nice change from last month. There are two vulnerabilities listed as publicly known at the time of release, but none listed as actively exploited.</p><p class="">Let’s take a closer look at some of the more interesting updates for this month, starting with a bug with an AI slant:</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26144"><strong>CVE-2026-26144</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Excel Information Disclosure Vulnerability<br></strong>This is a fascinating bug and an attack scenario we’re likely to see more often. The vulnerability is a simple cross-site scripting (XSS) bug in Excel, but an attacker could use it to cause the Copilot Agent to exfiltrate data off the target. This essentially makes it a zero-click information disclosure. Although not stated, the disclosure is likely at the level of the logged-on user, so there isn’t a privilege escalation component. Info disclosures rarely get rated Critical, but it makes sense here.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26110"><strong>CVE-2026-26110</strong></a><strong>/</strong><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26113"><strong>CVE-2026-26113</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability <br></strong>Another month and another pair of Office bugs where the Preview Pane is an exploit vector. I’ve lost count of how many of these bugs have been patched over the last year, but it’s just a matter of time until they start appearing in active exploits. The latest versions of Outlook allow you to hide the Preview Pane, but it isn’t clear if this would mitigate these attacks. The best option is still to test and deploy the update, but considering how many of these patches exist, it’s likely further updates will be needed to fully address these issues.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23669"><strong>CVE-2026-23669</strong></a><strong> - Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>Just reading the title makes me twitch with remembrances of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PrintNightmare">Print Nightmare</a> from a few years ago. This bug works in the same manner as those exploits. An authenticated attacker sends specially crafted messages to an affected system to gain arbitrary code execution. No user interaction is required. Let’s hope we don’t end up in a new nightmare of spooler exploits. Test and deploy this one quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23668"><strong>CVE-2026-23668</strong></a><strong> - Windows Graphics Component Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>This vulnerability was submitted to the ZDI program by Marcin Wiązowski as two separate bugs, and it demonstrates the need for variant investigations when creating security patches. Both cases are caused by the lack of proper locking when performing operations on an object. However, in one case, it’s in the cdd.dll driver while the other is in the win32kfull driver. Either way, an attacker could use these to elevate privileges to SYSTEM and execute arbitrary code. Since the fix for both is to add object locking to the GDI object, the cases are combined into a single CVE. That’s not a problem, but it does show how variants can occur, and fixes should be as broad as possible.</p><p class="">Here’s the full list of CVEs released by Microsoft for March 2026:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    





<link rel="File-List" href="2026_PatchTable-March.fld/filelist.xml">













<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="953">
 <col width="151" class="xl65">
 <col width="263" class="xl66">
 <col width="111" class="xl67" span="4">
 <col width="95" class="xl67">
 <col width="645" class="xl65">
 <tr height="47">
  <td width="151" class="xl65" height="47"><span> </span>CVE<span> </span></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Title<span> </span></td>
  <td width="111" class="xl67"><span> </span>Severity<span> </span></td>
  <td width="111" class="xl67"><span> </span>CVSS<span> </span></td>
  <td width="111" class="xl67"><span> </span>Public</td>
  <td width="111" class="xl67"><span> </span>Exploited<span> </span></td>
  <td width="95" class="xl67"><span> </span>Type<span> </span></td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26127"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26127<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>.NET Denial of Service Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl68"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21262"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21262<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>SQL Server Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl68"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23651"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23651<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft ACI Confidential Containers
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26124"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26124<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft ACI Confidential Containers
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26122"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26122<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft ACI Confidential Containers
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21536"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21536<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Devices Pricing Program Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26144"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26144<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26110"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26110<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26113"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26113<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26125"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26125<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Payment Orchestrator Service Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.6</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26131"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26131<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>.NET Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25177"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25177<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Active Directory Domain Services Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26117"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26117<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Arc Enabled Servers - Azure Connected
  Machine Agent Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26130"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26130<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>ASP.NET Core Denial of Service
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23661"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23661<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Azure IoT Explorer Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23662"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23662<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Azure IoT Explorer Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23664"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23664<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Azure IoT Explorer Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26121"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26121<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Azure IOT Explorer Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26118"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26118<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Azure MCP Server Tools Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23667"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23667<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Broadcast DVR Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25190"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25190<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>GDI Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25181"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25181<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>GDI+ Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="97">
  <td class="xl72" height="97"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26030"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26030 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>GitHub: CVE-2026-26030 Microsoft Semantic
  Kernel InMemoryVectorStore filter functionality vulnerable<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23654"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23654 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>GitHub: Zero Shot SCFoundation Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26141"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26141<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Hybrid Worker Extension (Arc-enabled Windows
  VMs) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23665"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23665 †</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Linux Azure Diagnostic extension (LAD)
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23674"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23674<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>MapUrlToZone Security Feature Bypass
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26123"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26123<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Authenticator Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26148"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26148 †</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Azure AD SSH Login extension for
  Linux Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25167"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25167<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Brokering File System Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26107"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26107<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26108"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26108<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26109"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26109<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26112"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26112<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26134"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26134<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Office Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26106"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26106<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26114"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26114<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26105"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26105<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24283"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24283<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Multiple UNC Provider Kernel Driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25165"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25165<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Performance Counters for Windows Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24282"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24282<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Push message Routing Service Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26115"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26115<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>SQL Server Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26116"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26116<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>SQL Server Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-20967"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-20967<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24285"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24285<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Win32k Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24291"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24291<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Accessibility Infrastructure
  (ATBroker.exe) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25186"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25186<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Accessibility Infrastructure
  (ATBroker.exe) Information Disclosure Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23660"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23660 †</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Admin Center in Azure Portal
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24293"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24293<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for
  WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25176"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25176<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for
  WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25178"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25178<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for
  WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25179"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25179<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for
  WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23656"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23656<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows App Installer Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.9</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25171"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25171<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Authentication Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23671"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23671<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Bluetooth RFCOM Protocol Driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24292"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24292<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Connected Devices Platform Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24295"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24295<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Device Association Service Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24296"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24296<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Device Association Service Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25189"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25189<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows DWM Core Library Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25174"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25174<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Extensible File Allocation Table
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25168"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25168<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Graphics Component Denial of Service
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25169"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25169<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Graphics Component Denial of Service
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23668"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23668<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Graphics Component Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25180"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25180<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Graphics Component Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25170"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25170<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Hyper-V Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24297"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24297<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Kerberos Security Feature Bypass
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24287"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24287<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24289"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24289<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26132"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26132<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24288"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24288<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Mobile Broadband Driver Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25175"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25175<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows NTFS Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23669"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23669<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24290"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24290<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Projected File System Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23673"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23673<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Resilient File System (ReFS)
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25172"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25172<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Routing and Remote Access Service
  (RRAS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25173"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25173<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Routing and Remote Access Service
  (RRAS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26111"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26111<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Routing and Remote Access Service
  (RRAS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25185"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25185<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Shell Link Processing Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24294"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24294<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows SMB Server Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26128"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26128<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows SMB Server Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25166"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25166<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows System Image Manager Assessment and
  Deployment Kit (ADK) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25188"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25188<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Telephony Service Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23672"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23672<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Universal Disk Format File System
  Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25187"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25187<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Winlogon Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3536"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3536 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3536 Integer overflow in
  ANGLE<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3538"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3538 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3538 Integer overflow in
  Skia<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3539"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3539 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3539 Object lifecycle
  issue in DevTools<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3540"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3540 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3540 Inappropriate
  implementation in WebAudio<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3541"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3541 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3541 Inappropriate
  implementation in CSS<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3542"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3542 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3542 Inappropriate
  implementation in WebAssembly<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3543"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3543 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3543 Inappropriate
  implementation in V8<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3544"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3544 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3544 Heap buffer overflow
  in WebCodecs<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3545"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3545 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3545 Insufficient data
  validation in Navigation<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![if supportMisalignedColumns]&gt;
 <tr height="0">
  <td width="151"></td>
  <td width="263"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="95"></td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![endif]&gt;
</table>











  
  









  <p class=""><em>* Indicates this CVE had been released by a third party and is now being included in Microsoft releases</em>.</p><p class=""><em>† Indicates further administrative actions are required to fully address the vulnerability.</em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class="">Looking at the other Critical-rated bugs in this month’s release, they are all cloud-native and require no user action. Microsoft has already remediated the vulnerabilities.</p><p class="">Moving on to the other code execution bugs, the vulnerabilities in SharePoint Server pop out first. Both require authentication, but it’s essentially the lowest level of authentication, so these would be ideal cases for lateral movement within an enterprise. There are the standard open-and-own cases within Office components. There an interesting sounding bug in the Windows Mobile Broadband Driver that requires physical access, but Microsoft doesn’t elaborate on the attack scenario beyond that fact. The bug in the System Image Manager Assessment and Deployment Kit (ADK) requires authentication. The bug in GDI requires user interaction. The remaining code execution bugs are in the RRAS protocol. We’ve seen bugs in this component in the past, but never in the wild. I wouldn’t ignore these, but I wouldn’t rush them out either.</p><p class="">Similar to last month, updates for Elevation of Privilege (EoP) bugs make up nearly half of this month’s release. And as we saw last month, but most simply lead to local attackers executing their code at SYSTEM-level privileges or administrative privileges. The bugs in SQL Server allow attackers to elevate to SQL sysadmin privileges. The bug in the Azure MCP Server is more complex. It allows attackers to obtain the permissions associated with the MCP Server’s managed identity, which lets them perform actions that the managed identity is able to reach. The bug in the Azure AD SSH Login extension for Linux leads to root access, and it won’t be easy to patch. You’ll need to run the update instructions from the command line on each affected system. That’s the same case for the bug in the Linux Azure Diagnostic extension (LAD). There’s an odd bug in the Hybrid Worker Extension (Arc‑enabled Windows VMs) that leads to “ELEVATED” privileges, which is something I’ve never seen before. The bug in the Broadcast DVR component allows an attacker to go from low integrity level up to medium. There’s a bug listed as an EoP in the Push message Routing Service, but reading the description, Microsoft notes it could lead to an information disclosure. It’s likely this is an error and should be an Information Disclosure bug. The final EoP is in the Azure Portal Windows Admin Center and leads to SYSTEM. However, there’s no patch to remediate this bug. Instead, you need to install the latest version of the Windows Admin Center extension through the Azure Portal by hand. </p><p class="">There are two security feature bypass patches in the March release. The first is a bypass of the MapURLToZone method, which (as expected) allows attackers to bypass MapURLToZone protections. The third bypass is in Kerberos and could allow an attacker to either view some sensitive information or make changes to “disclosed” information. This is a race condition that occurs while the group policy is being reapplied, so the window to exploit this would be extremely small.</p><p class="">Looking at the remaining info disclosure bugs getting patched this month, only two result in info leaks consisting of unspecified memory contents or memory addresses. Ther others provide more interesting results. There are three bugs in the Azure IoT Explorer have some wide-ranging implications. According to Microsoft, exploitation could result in, “device connection information, authentication tokens, request data, file paths, and other information transmitted between the application and the IoT Hub.” The bug in Authenticator almost reads like a security feature bypass, as exploit results in the disclosure of a one‑time sign‑in code or authentication deep link. The attacker would receive the sign‑in information and could potentially use it to authenticate as the user, allowing access to information or services available to that account. The last info disclosure bug is in the Accessibility Infrastructure and allows an attacker to gain secrets or privileged information belonging to the user of the affected application.</p><p class="">There are only four spoofing bugs in the March release. The first is in SharePoint server and manifests as an XSS. The second bug is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the Azure IoT Explorer. The remaining two are a bit more cryptic. The bug in Windows Shell Link Processing results from the “exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor,” and could lead to spoofing. That sounds like credential exposure, but it’s not explicitly called out. The final spoofing bug results from the insufficient verification of data authenticity in Windows App Installer. Again, this sounds vaguely like credential reflection, but without further information, we can only speculate. </p><p class="">Finally, there are four denial-of-service (DoS) bugs in the release, including one that’s listed as publicly known in the .NET Framework. As usual, Microsoft provides no actionable information about these bugs.</p><p class="">No new advisories are being released this month.</p><p class=""><strong>Looking Ahead</strong></p><p class="">I plan on being at RSA for the first time in my career, so if you’re around, please stop by and say hello. I like it when people say hello. Otherwise, I’ll be back on April 14 with my assessment of that patch Tuesday release. Until then, stay safe, happy patching, and may all your reboots be smooth and clean!</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The April 2026 Security Update Review]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It’s time once again for Patch Tuesday, and this one is huge. We’ve also got multiple exploits in the wild, which adds another layer of urgency to this month’s release. Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities, and let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Micro...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694470/it-security-nachrichten/the-april-2026-security-update-review/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694470/it-security-nachrichten/the-april-2026-security-update-review/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:00:42 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="">It’s time once again for Patch Tuesday, and this one is huge. We’ve also got multiple exploits in the wild, which adds another layer of urgency to this month’s release. Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities, and let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft. If you’d rather watch the full video recap covering the entire release, you can check it out here:</p>





















  
  




  
















  
    
      
    
    
      
        
      
    
    
    



  






  <p class=""><strong>Adobe Patches for April 2026</strong></p><p class="">For April, Adobe released 12 bulletins addressing 61 unique CVEs in Adobe Acrobat Reader, InDesign, InCopy, FrameMaker, Connect, ColdFusion, Bridge, Photoshop, Illustrator, Experience Manager Screens, and the Adobe DNG SDK. Three of the Cold Fusion bugs came through the TrendAI ZDI program. For this month, I’m introducing an Adobe table as well. I’d love to get your feedback on whether this is helpful.</p>





















  
  




  


  
    


<table>
<colgroup>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
</colgroup>
<thead>
  <tr>
    <th>Bulletin ID</th>
    <th>Product</th>
    <th>CVE Count</th>
    <th>Highest Severity</th>
    <th>Highest CVSS</th>
    <th>Exploited</th>
    <th>Deployment Priority</th>
  </tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/acrobat/apsb26-43.html" target="_blank">APSB26-43</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Acrobat Reader</td>
    <td>1</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.6</td>
    <td>Yes</td>
    <td>1</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/acrobat/apsb26-44.html" target="_blank">APSB26-44</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Acrobat Reader</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>2</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/indesign/apsb26-32.html" target="_blank">APSB26-32</a></td>
    <td>Adobe InDesign</td>
    <td>9</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/incopy/apsb26-33.html" target="_blank">APSB26-33</a></td>
    <td>Adobe InCopy</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/framemaker/apsb26-36.html" target="_blank">APSB26-36</a></td>
    <td>Adobe FrameMaker</td>
    <td>11</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/connect/apsb26-37.html" target="_blank">APSB26-37</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Connect</td>
    <td>9</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/coldfusion/apsb26-38.html" target="_blank">APSB26-38</a></td>
    <td>Adobe ColdFusion</td>
    <td>7</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.3</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>1</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/bridge/apsb26-39.html" target="_blank">APSB26-39</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Bridge</td>
    <td>6</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/photoshop/apsb26-40.html" target="_blank">APSB26-40</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Photoshop</td>
    <td>1</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/illustrator/apsb26-42.html" target="_blank">APSB26-42</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Illustrator</td>
    <td>1</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/aem-screens/apsb26-34.html" target="_blank">APSB26-34</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Experience Manager Screens</td>
    <td>9</td>
    <td>Important</td>
    <td>5.4</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/dng-sdk/apsb26-41.html" target="_blank">APSB26-41</a></td>
    <td>Adobe DNG SDK</td>
    <td>3</td>
    <td>Important</td>
    <td>5.5</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
</tbody>
</table>



  
  









  <p class="">Obviously, the active attack in Reader is the highest priority for this month, but don’t ignore the second bunch of Reader patches. Cold Fusion also gets a deployment priority of 1, so if you’re still running that platform, make sure you get the update. Otherwise, the FrameMaker and Connect patches fix 11 and nine bugs, respectively. InDesign and Experience Manager Screens also have nine CVEs addressed. </p><p class="">Outside of the Reader bug, none of the other bugs fixed by Adobe this month are listed as publicly known or under active attack at the time of release. One of the Reader bugs and Cold Fusion have a deployment priority of one, the other Reader bug has a priority of two, while all of the other updates released by Adobe this month are listed as deployment priority 3.</p><p class=""><strong>Microsoft Patches for April 2026</strong></p><p class="">This month, Microsoft released a monstrous 163 new CVEs in Windows and Windows components, Office and Office Components, Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based), Azure, .NET and Visual Studio, SQL Server, Hyper-V Server, BitLocker, and the Windows Wallet Service. Counting the third-party and a huge Chromium release, it brings the total number of CVEs to a staggering 247 updates. Six of these bugs were reported through the TrendAI ZDI program. Eight of these bugs are rated Critical, two are rated as Moderate, and the rest are rated Important in severity.</p><p class="">By my count, this is the second-largest monthly release in Microsoft’s history. There are many things we could speculate on to justify the size, but if Microsoft is like the other programs out there (including ours), they are likely seeing a rise in submissions found by AI tools. For us, our incoming rate has essentially tripled, making triage a challenge, to say the least. Whatever the reason, we have a lot of bugs to deal with this month. I should also point out that the Pwn2Own Berlin occurs next month, and it’s typical for vendors to patch as much as they can before the event.</p><p class="">There is one Microsoft bug listed as under active attack at the time of release, and one other that’s publicly known. Let’s take a closer look at some of the more interesting updates for this month, starting with the vulnerability being exploited in the wild:</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32201" target="_blank"><strong>CVE-2026-32201</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing Vulnerability<br></strong>Microsoft doesn’t provide a lot of information about this bug, but Spoofing bugs in SharePoint often manifest as cross-site scripting (XSS) bugs. They do note that attackers could view information or make changes to disclosed information. As always, they don’t provide any information on how widespread these attacks are, but I wouldn’t wait to test and deploy this fix – especially if you have internet-connected SharePoint servers.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33825" target="_blank"><strong>CVE-2026-33825</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Defender Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>This bug is listed as publicly known, and this time, we know exactly <a href="https://deadeclipse666.blogspot.com/2026/04/public-disclosure.html" target="_blank">where</a> it was disclosed. There have been some questions about how exploitable this bug may be, but it does look like it’s a real problem – just with some reliability issues in its current state. I won’t add on to the commentary from the researcher about working with Microsoft. I’m just glad they are offering a fix for the vulnerability. If you rely on Defender, test and deploy this one quickly.</p><p class="">-   <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33827" target="_blank"><strong>CVE-2026-33827</strong></a><strong> - Windows TCP/IP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>This vulnerability allows remote, unauthenticated attackers to exploit code on affected systems without user interaction. That adds up to a wormable bug – at least on systems with IPv6 and IPSec enabled. It is a race condition, which sets exploitability to High on the CVSS scale, but we see race conditions exploited at Pwn2Own all the time, so don’t rely on that obstacle. If you’re running IPv6, I would test and deploy this fix quickly before public exploits become available.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33824" target="_blank"><strong>CVE-2026-33824</strong></a><strong> - Windows Internet Key Exchange (IKE) Service Extensions Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>Speaking of wormable bugs, here’s our second one this month. By the title, we can tell that systems with IKE enabled are affected, but that leaves plenty of targets for attackers. Microsoft also notes a significant mitigation for this bug. Blocking UDP ports 500 and 4500 at the perimeter prevents external attackers from reaching the affected service. However, insiders could still target this for lateral movement within an enterprise. For enterprises using IKE, get this fix tested and deployed with haste.</p><p class="">Here’s the full list of CVEs released by Microsoft for April 2026:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    




<title>April 2026 Patch Tuesday</title>



<table>
<thead><tr>
  <th>CVE</th>
  <th>Title</th>
  <th>Severity</th>
  <th>CVSS</th>
  <th>Public</th>
  <th>Exploited</th>
  <th>Type</th>
</tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32201">CVE-2026-32201</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Yes</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5281">CVE-2026-5281 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5281 Use after free in Dawn</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Yes</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33825">CVE-2026-33825</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Defender Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>Yes</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23666">CVE-2026-23666</a></td>
  <td>.NET Framework Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32190">CVE-2026-32190</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>8.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33114">CVE-2026-33114</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>8.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33115">CVE-2026-33115</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>8.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32157">CVE-2026-32157</a></td>
  <td>Remote Desktop Client Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>8.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33826">CVE-2026-33826</a></td>
  <td>Windows Active Directory Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33824">CVE-2026-33824</a></td>
  <td>Windows Internet Key Exchange (IKE) Service Extensions Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>9.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33827">CVE-2026-33827</a></td>
  <td>Windows TCP/IP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>8.1</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26171">CVE-2026-26171</a></td>
  <td>.NET Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32226">CVE-2026-32226</a></td>
  <td>.NET Framework Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.9</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32178">CVE-2026-32178</a></td>
  <td>.NET Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32203">CVE-2026-32203</a></td>
  <td>.NET and Visual Studio Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33116">CVE-2026-33116</a></td>
  <td>.NET, .NET Framework, and Visual Studio Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2023-20585">CVE-2023-20585 *</a></td>
  <td>AMD: CVE-2023-20585 IOMMU Write Buffer Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.3</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32072">CVE-2026-32072</a></td>
  <td>Active Directory Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.2</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25184">CVE-2026-25184</a></td>
  <td>Applocker Filter Driver (applockerfltr.sys) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32171">CVE-2026-32171</a></td>
  <td>Azure Logic Apps Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32168">CVE-2026-32168</a></td>
  <td>Azure Monitor Agent Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32192">CVE-2026-32192</a></td>
  <td>Azure Monitor Agent Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32181">CVE-2026-32181</a></td>
  <td>Connected User Experiences and Telemetry Service Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27924">CVE-2026-27924</a></td>
  <td>Desktop Window Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32152">CVE-2026-32152</a></td>
  <td>Desktop Window Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32154">CVE-2026-32154</a></td>
  <td>Desktop Window Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27923">CVE-2026-27923</a></td>
  <td>Desktop Window Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32155">CVE-2026-32155</a></td>
  <td>Desktop Window Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23653">CVE-2026-23653</a></td>
  <td>GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Code Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32631">CVE-2026-23653 *</a></td>
  <td> GitHub: CVE-2026-32631 'git clone' from manipulated repositories can leak NTLM hashes </td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33096">CVE-2026-33096</a></td>
  <td>HTTP.sys Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25250">CVE-2026-25250 *</a></td>
  <td>MITRE: CVE-2026-25250 Secure Boot disable Eazy Fix</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26181">CVE-2026-26181</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Brokering File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32219">CVE-2026-32219</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Brokering File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32091">CVE-2026-32091</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Brokering File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26152">CVE-2026-26152</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Cryptographic Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33103">CVE-2026-33103</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Dynamics 365 (On-Premises) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32188">CVE-2026-32188</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Excel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.1</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32189">CVE-2026-32189</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32197">CVE-2026-32197</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32198">CVE-2026-32198</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32199">CVE-2026-32199</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32184">CVE-2026-32184</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft High Performance Compute (HPC) Pack Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26155">CVE-2026-26155</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Local Security Authority Subsystem Service Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27914">CVE-2026-27914</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Management Console Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26149">CVE-2026-26149</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Power Apps Security Feature Bypass</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>9</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32200">CVE-2026-32200</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft PowerPoint Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26143">CVE-2026-26143</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft PowerShell Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33120">CVE-2026-33120 †</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft SQL Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-20945">CVE-2026-20945</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>4.6</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33822">CVE-2026-33822</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Word Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.1</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33095">CVE-2026-33095</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23657">CVE-2026-23657</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32081">CVE-2026-32081</a></td>
  <td>Package Catalog Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26170">CVE-2026-26170</a></td>
  <td>PowerShell Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26183">CVE-2026-26183</a></td>
  <td>Remote Access Management service/API (RPC server) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26160">CVE-2026-26160</a></td>
  <td>Remote Desktop Licensing Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26159">CVE-2026-26159</a></td>
  <td>Remote Desktop Licensing Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26151">CVE-2026-26151</a></td>
  <td>Remote Desktop Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.1</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32085">CVE-2026-32085</a></td>
  <td>Remote Procedure Call Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32167">CVE-2026-32167</a></td>
  <td>SQL Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32176">CVE-2026-32176</a></td>
  <td>SQL Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-0390">CVE-2026-0390</a></td>
  <td>UEFI Secure Boot Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32220">CVE-2026-32220</a></td>
  <td>UEFI Secure Boot Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>4.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32212">CVE-2026-32212</a></td>
  <td>Universal Plug and Play (upnp.dll) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32214">CVE-2026-32214</a></td>
  <td>Universal Plug and Play (upnp.dll) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32079">CVE-2026-32079</a></td>
  <td>Web Account Manager Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33104">CVE-2026-33104</a></td>
  <td>Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32196">CVE-2026-32196</a></td>
  <td>Windows Admin Center Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.1</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26178">CVE-2026-26178</a></td>
  <td>Windows Advanced Rasterization Platform Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32073">CVE-2026-32073</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26168">CVE-2026-26168</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26173">CVE-2026-26173</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26177">CVE-2026-26177</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26182">CVE-2026-26182</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27922">CVE-2026-27922</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33099">CVE-2026-33099</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33100">CVE-2026-33100</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32088">CVE-2026-32088</a></td>
  <td>Windows Biometric Service Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.1</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27913">CVE-2026-27913</a></td>
  <td>Windows BitLocker Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26175">CVE-2026-26175</a></td>
  <td>Windows Boot Manager Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>4.6</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32162">CVE-2026-32162</a></td>
  <td>Windows COM Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-20806">CVE-2026-20806</a></td>
  <td>Windows COM Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26176">CVE-2026-26176</a></td>
  <td>Windows Client Side Caching driver (csc.sys) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27926">CVE-2026-27926</a></td>
  <td>Windows Cloud Files Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32070">CVE-2026-32070</a></td>
  <td>Windows Common Log File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33098">CVE-2026-33098</a></td>
  <td>Windows Container Isolation FS Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26153">CVE-2026-26153</a></td>
  <td>Windows Encrypted File System (EFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32087">CVE-2026-32087</a></td>
  <td>Windows Function Discovery Service (fdwsd.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32093">CVE-2026-32093</a></td>
  <td>Windows Function Discovery Service (fdwsd.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32086">CVE-2026-32086</a></td>
  <td>Windows Function Discovery Service (fdwsd.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32150">CVE-2026-32150</a></td>
  <td>Windows Function Discovery Service (fdwsd.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27931">CVE-2026-27931</a></td>
  <td>Windows GDI Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27930">CVE-2026-27930</a></td>
  <td>Windows GDI Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32221">CVE-2026-32221</a></td>
  <td>Windows Graphics Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27906">CVE-2026-27906</a></td>
  <td>Windows Hello Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>4.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27928">CVE-2026-27928</a></td>
  <td>Windows Hello Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26156">CVE-2026-26156</a></td>
  <td>Windows Hyper-V Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32149">CVE-2026-32149</a></td>
  <td>Windows Hyper-V Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.3</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27910">CVE-2026-27910</a></td>
  <td>Windows Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27912">CVE-2026-27912</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kerberos Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26179">CVE-2026-26179</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26180">CVE-2026-26180</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32195">CVE-2026-32195</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26163">CVE-2026-26163</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32215">CVE-2026-32215</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32217">CVE-2026-32217</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32218">CVE-2026-32218</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26169">CVE-2026-26169</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Memory Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.1</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27929">CVE-2026-27929</a></td>
  <td>Windows LUA File Virtualization Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32071">CVE-2026-32071</a></td>
  <td>Windows Local Security Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-20930">CVE-2026-20930</a></td>
  <td>Windows Management Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26162">CVE-2026-26162</a></td>
  <td>Windows OLE Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33101">CVE-2026-33101</a></td>
  <td>Windows Print Spooler Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32084">CVE-2026-32084</a></td>
  <td>Windows Print Spooler Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27927">CVE-2026-27927</a></td>
  <td>Windows Projected File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26184">CVE-2026-26184</a></td>
  <td>Windows Projected File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32069">CVE-2026-32069</a></td>
  <td>Windows Projected File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32074">CVE-2026-32074</a></td>
  <td>Windows Projected File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32078">CVE-2026-32078</a></td>
  <td>Windows Projected File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26167">CVE-2026-26167</a></td>
  <td>Windows Push Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32158">CVE-2026-32158</a></td>
  <td>Windows Push Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32159">CVE-2026-32159</a></td>
  <td>Windows Push Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32160">CVE-2026-32160</a></td>
  <td>Windows Push Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26172">CVE-2026-26172</a></td>
  <td>Windows Push Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-20928">CVE-2026-20928</a></td>
  <td>Windows Recovery Environment Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>4.6</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32216">CVE-2026-32216</a></td>
  <td>Windows Redirected Drive Buffering System Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27909">CVE-2026-27909</a></td>
  <td>Windows Search Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26161">CVE-2026-26161</a></td>
  <td>Windows Sensor Data Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26174">CVE-2026-26174</a></td>
  <td>Windows Server Update Service (WSUS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32224">CVE-2026-32224</a></td>
  <td>Windows Server Update Service (WSUS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26154">CVE-2026-26154</a></td>
  <td>Windows Server Update Service (WSUS) Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Tampering</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26165">CVE-2026-26165</a></td>
  <td>Windows Shell Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26166">CVE-2026-26166</a></td>
  <td>Windows Shell Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27918">CVE-2026-27918</a></td>
  <td>Windows Shell Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32151">CVE-2026-32151</a></td>
  <td>Windows Shell Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32225">CVE-2026-32225</a></td>
  <td>Windows Shell Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32202">CVE-2026-32202</a></td>
  <td>Windows Shell Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>4.3</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32082">CVE-2026-32082</a></td>
  <td>Windows Simple Search and Discovery Protocol (SSDP) Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32083">CVE-2026-32083</a></td>
  <td>Windows Simple Search and Discovery Protocol (SSDP) Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32068">CVE-2026-32068</a></td>
  <td>Windows Simple Search and Discovery Protocol (SSDP) Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32183">CVE-2026-32183</a></td>
  <td>Windows Snipping Tool Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32089">CVE-2026-32089</a></td>
  <td>Windows Speech Brokered Api Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32090">CVE-2026-32090</a></td>
  <td>Windows Speech Brokered Api Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32153">CVE-2026-32153</a></td>
  <td>Windows Speech Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27907">CVE-2026-27907</a></td>
  <td>Windows Storage Spaces Controller Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32076">CVE-2026-32076</a></td>
  <td>Windows Storage Spaces Controller Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27908">CVE-2026-27908</a></td>
  <td>Windows TDI Translation Driver (tdx.sys) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27921">CVE-2026-27921</a></td>
  <td>Windows TDI Translation Driver (tdx.sys) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27915">CVE-2026-27915</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27919">CVE-2026-27919</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32075">CVE-2026-32075</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27916">CVE-2026-27916</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27920">CVE-2026-27920</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32077">CVE-2026-32077</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27925">CVE-2026-27925</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32156">CVE-2026-32156</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32223">CVE-2026-32223</a></td>
  <td>Windows USB Printing Stack (usbprint.sys) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32165">CVE-2026-32165</a></td>
  <td>Windows User Interface Core Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27911">CVE-2026-27911</a></td>
  <td>Windows User Interface Core Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32163">CVE-2026-32163</a></td>
  <td>Windows User Interface Core Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32164">CVE-2026-32164</a></td>
  <td>Windows User Interface Core Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23670">CVE-2026-23670</a></td>
  <td>Windows Virtualization-Based Security (VBS) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27917">CVE-2026-27917</a></td>
  <td>Windows WFP NDIS Lightweight Filter Driver (wfplwfs.sys) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32080">CVE-2026-32080</a></td>
  <td>Windows WalletService Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32222">CVE-2026-32222</a></td>
  <td>Windows Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21637">CVE-2026-21637 *</a></td>
  <td> HackerOne: CVE-2026-21637 TLS PSK/ALPN Callback Exceptions Bypass Error Handlers</td>
  <td> Moderate</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33119">CVE-2026-33119</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) for Android Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Moderate</td>
  <td>5.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33829">CVE-2026-33829</a></td>
  <td>Windows Snipping Tool Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Moderate</td>
  <td>4.3</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5858">CVE-2026-5858 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5858 Heap buffer overflow in WebML</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5859">CVE-2026-5859 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5859 Integer overflow in WebML</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5272">CVE-2026-5272 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5272 Heap buffer overflow in GPU</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5273">CVE-2026-5273 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5273 Use after free in CSS</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5274">CVE-2026-5274 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5274 Integer overflow in Codecs</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5275">CVE-2026-5275 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5275 Heap buffer overflow in ANGLE</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5276">CVE-2026-5276 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5276 Insufficient policy enforcement in WebUSB</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5277">CVE-2026-5277 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5277 Integer overflow in ANGLE</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5279">CVE-2026-5279 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5279 Object corruption in V8</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5280">CVE-2026-5280 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5280 Use after free in WebCodecs</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5283">CVE-2026-5283 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5283 Inappropriate implementation in ANGLE</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5284">CVE-2026-5284 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5284 Use after free in Dawn</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5285">CVE-2026-5285 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5285 Use after free in WebGL</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5286">CVE-2026-5286 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5286 Use after free in Dawn</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5287">CVE-2026-5287 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5287 Use after free in PDF</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5289">CVE-2026-5289 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5289 Use after free in Navigation</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5290">CVE-2026-5290 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5290 Use after free in Compositing</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5860">CVE-2026-5860 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5860 Use after free in WebRTC</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5861">CVE-2026-5861 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5861 Use after free in V8</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5862">CVE-2026-5862 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5862 Inappropriate implementation in V8</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5863">CVE-2026-5863 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5863 Inappropriate implementation in V8</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5864">CVE-2026-5864 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5864 Heap buffer overflow in WebAudio</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5865">CVE-2026-5865 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5865 Type Confusion in V8</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5866">CVE-2026-5866 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5866 Use after free in Media</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5867">CVE-2026-5867 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5867 Heap buffer overflow in WebML</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5868">CVE-2026-5868 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5868 Heap buffer overflow in ANGLE</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5869">CVE-2026-5869 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5869 Heap buffer overflow in WebML</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5870">CVE-2026-5870 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5870 Integer overflow in Skia</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5871">CVE-2026-5871 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5871 Type Confusion in V8</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5872">CVE-2026-5872 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5872 Use after free in Blink</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5873">CVE-2026-5873 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5873 Out of bounds read and write in V8</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5291">CVE-2026-5291 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5291 Inappropriate implementation in WebGL</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5292">CVE-2026-5292 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5292 Out of bounds read in WebCodecs</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5874">CVE-2026-5874 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5874 Use after free in PrivateAI</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5875">CVE-2026-5875 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5875 Policy bypass in Blink</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5876">CVE-2026-5876 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5876 Side-channel information leakage in Navigation</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5877">CVE-2026-5877 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5877 Use after free in Navigation</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5878">CVE-2026-5878 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5878 Incorrect security UI in Blink</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5879">CVE-2026-5879 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5879 Insufficient validation of untrusted input in ANGLE</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5880">CVE-2026-5880 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5880 Incorrect security UI in browser UI</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5881">CVE-2026-5881 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5881 Policy bypass in LocalNetworkAccess</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5882">CVE-2026-5882 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5882 Incorrect security UI in Fullscreen</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5883">CVE-2026-5883 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5883 Use after free in Media</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5884">CVE-2026-5884 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5884 Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Media</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5885">CVE-2026-5885 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5885 Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebML</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5886">CVE-2026-5886 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5886 Out of bounds read in WebAudio</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5887">CVE-2026-5887 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5887 Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Downloads</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5888">CVE-2026-5888 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5888 Uninitialized Use in WebCodecs</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5889">CVE-2026-5889 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5889 Cryptographic Flaw in PDFium</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5890">CVE-2026-5890 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5890 Race in WebCodecs</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5891">CVE-2026-5891 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5891 Insufficient policy enforcement in browser UI</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5892">CVE-2026-5892 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5892 Insufficient policy enforcement in PWAs</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5893">CVE-2026-5893 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5893 Race in V8</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5894">CVE-2026-5894 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5894 Inappropriate implementation in PDF</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5895">CVE-2026-5895 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5895 Incorrect security UI in Omnibox</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5896">CVE-2026-5896 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5896 Policy bypass in Audio</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5897">CVE-2026-5897 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5897 Incorrect security UI in Downloads</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5898">CVE-2026-5898 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5898 Incorrect security UI in Omnibox</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5899">CVE-2026-5899 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5899 Incorrect security UI in History Navigation</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5900">CVE-2026-5900 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5900 Policy bypass in Downloads</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5901">CVE-2026-5901 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5901 Policy bypass in DevTools</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5902">CVE-2026-5902 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5902 Race in Media</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5903">CVE-2026-5903 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5903 Policy bypass in IFrameSandbox</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5904">CVE-2026-5904 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5904 Use after free in V8</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5905">CVE-2026-5905 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5905 Incorrect security UI in Permissions</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5906">CVE-2026-5906 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5906 Incorrect security UI in Omnibox</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5907">CVE-2026-5907 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5907 Insufficient data validation in Media</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5908">CVE-2026-5908 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5908 Integer overflow in Media</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5909">CVE-2026-5909 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5909 Integer overflow in Media</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5910">CVE-2026-5910 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5910 Integer overflow in Media</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5911">CVE-2026-5911 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5911 Policy bypass in ServiceWorkers</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5912">CVE-2026-5912 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5912 Integer overflow in WebRTC</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5913">CVE-2026-5913 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5913 Out of bounds read in Blink</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5914">CVE-2026-5914 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5914 Type Confusion in CSS</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5915">CVE-2026-5915 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5915 Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebML</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5918">CVE-2026-5918 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5918 Inappropriate implementation in Navigation</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5919">CVE-2026-5919 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5919 Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebSockets</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33118">CVE-2026-33118</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>4.3</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
  
  









  <p class=""><em>* Indicates this CVE had been released by a third party and is now being included in Microsoft releases</em>.</p><p class=""><em>† Indicates further administrative actions are required to fully address the vulnerability.</em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class="">Looking at the other Critical-rated bugs in this month’s release, there are three Office-related bugs where the Preview Pane is once again listed as an exploit vector. I would still like to have a full-proof way of disabling the Preview Pane, but I don’t see that as an option. There’s a bug in the RDP client, but that involves connecting to a malicious RDP server. The bug in Active Directory requires authentication and a network adjacent attacker. The final Critical-rated bug is an interesting DoS in .NET Framework. An unauthenticated attacker could deny service over a network – presumably crippling any affected app made in .NET. You rarely see Critical-rated DoS bugs, but this one deserves the moniker.</p><p class="">Moving on to the other code execution bugs, you have quite a few open-and-own bugs in Office components, most notably Excel, where the Preview Pane is not an attack vector. The bug in SQL Server requires authentication, and as usual, additional steps are needed to ensure you have the correct update to remediate this vulnerability. The two bugs in Hyper-V almost reads like a privilege escalation since it allows unauthorized attackers to execute code locally. That’s the same for the bugs in the Windows Snipping Tool and the UPnP Device host. </p><p class="">More than half of this release addresses Elevation of Privilege (EoP) bugs. However, most simply lead to local attackers executing their code at SYSTEM-level privileges or administrative privileges, so there’s not much to add without further technical details about the bugs themselves. The bugs in SQL Server could allow an attacker to gain SQL sysadmin privileges. One of the kernel bugs simply states an attacker could “elevate privileges locally”. How obtuse. That’s similar for the bug in afd.sys and Desktop Windows Manager, but Microsoft also states that these bugs could crash an affected system. There are several bugs that result in a sandbox escape, including Windows Push Notifications, AFD for Winsock, Management Services, and User Interface Core. Of these, CVE-2026-26167 (Push Notifications) is the most notable — it's the only one with low attack complexity, meaning no race condition needed. The rest all require winning a race condition (AC:H). The bugs in UPnP are interesting as they allow attackers to gain access to a limited set of administrator-protected objects. Not a full escalation but definitely getting access to resources they shouldn’t. The vulnerability in the Brokering File System allows attackers to gain the level of the logged on user, so don’t do your normal activities as a user with admin privileges. The bug in Azure Monitor Agent leads to root-level access. </p><p class="">There are a dozen different security features bypass bugs in the April release. Some of these are obvious by the title alone. For example, the bugs in Windows Hello bypass safety features within the Hello app itself. The bug in the Biometric Service allows attackers to bypass biometric protections. The vulns in BitLocker and Secure Boot bypass protections in those components. The bug in Power Apps allows attackers to bypass a security warning dialog and trick targets into triggering an external protocol call that performs unintended actions on the user’s device. The bug in Windows Shell allows attackers to bypass Mark of the Web (MotW) protections. The bug in PowerShell could almost be described as a code execution bug as exploiting it bypasses dynamic-expression security checks, which could result in code execution. The vulnerability in the Windows Recovery Environment allows local attackers to bypass BitLocker device encryption. Finally, the bug in Virtualization‑Based Security (VBS) is the most interesting of the bunch – and not just because VBS is a (relatively) new feature. The problem allows attackers to manipulate allow a compromised Windows kernel to modify memory belonging to the secure kernel, breaking the intended isolation guarantees provided by VBS. Somewhat of a sandbox escape, but this time, you’re escaping from Virtual Trust Level 0 (VTL0) to Virtual Trust Level 1 (VTL1). Neat.</p><p class="">Moving on to the Information Disclosure bugs fixed this month, we have 20 different CVEs. Fortunately, most of these simply result in info leaks consisting of unspecified memory contents or memory addresses. While useful in crafting exploits, they aren’t exactly exciting on their own. There are also several bugs that disclose addresses from an object a contained in a sandboxed execution environment. This includes bugs in the Print Spooler, Package Catalog, and Web Account Manager. The bug in Dynamics 365 discloses the ever ineffable “sensitive information”. There are three different info disclosure bugs in UPnP. Two allow an attacker to read from the file system, while the third discloses anything available to the LOCAL SERVICE account. The final info disclosure bug resides in Copilot and Visual Studio and allows attackers to disclose the contents of the Model Context Protocol (MCP) when using Copilot. There are those who think MCP is dead (thanks to agentic AI agents), but if you’re using a custom MCP, I doubt you would want it leaked.</p><p class="">The April release contains just a handful of Spoofing bugs. Some, like the bugs in .NET, Active Directory, and Windows Shell, just say that they allow spoofing over a network. Others, like the bug in Windows Snipping Tool, say similar but also note that it could be used to relay NTLMv2 hashes. The patch for RDP <a href="https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=2347342">notes</a> that there are new warning dialogs coming this month. The bug in the Windows Admin Center would allow an attacker to interact with other tenant’s applications and content. Finally, the spoofing bug in SharePoint is another XSS issue.</p><p class="">There are eight DoS bugs in the April release, but as always, Microsoft provides no actionable information about the vulnerabilities. Microsoft does offer a mitigation for the http.sys bug that can be applied while you test and deploy the patch, but I would rely on the patch rather than the mitigation. Another exception is the bug for Connected User Experiences and Telemetry Service, which allows attackers to deny service locally rather than over the network.</p><p class="">The final(!) bug in the April release is a Tampering bug in WSUS that reads like a DoS. According to Microsoft, “An attacker can send specially crafted packets which could affect availability of the service and result in Denial of Service (DoS).” But sure – let’s call it Tampering. </p><p class="">No new advisories are being released this month.</p><p class=""><strong>Looking Ahead</strong></p><p class="">I will be in Berlin for the next Patch Tuesday, which will be May 12, and I’ll provide my full thoughts then on what will hopefully be a smaller release than this one. Until then, stay safe, happy patching, and may all your reboots be smooth and clean!</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Announcing Pwn2Own Berlin for 2026]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[If you just want to read the contest rules, click here. Willkommen zurück, meine Damen und Herren, zu unserem zweiten Wettbewerb in Berlin! That’s correct (if Google translate didn’t steer me wrong). After our inaugural competition last year, Pwn2Own returns to Berlin and OffensiveCon. Outside of...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694471/it-security-nachrichten/announcing-pwn2own-berlin-for-2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694471/it-security-nachrichten/announcing-pwn2own-berlin-for-2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:00:42 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class=""><em>If you just want to read the contest rules, click </em><a href="https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/Pwn2OwnBerlin2026Rules.html" target="_blank"><em>here</em></a><em>.</em></p><p class=""> </p><p class="">Willkommen zurück, meine Damen und Herren, zu unserem zweiten Wettbewerb in Berlin! That’s correct (if Google translate didn’t steer me wrong). After our inaugural competition last year, Pwn2Own returns to Berlin and <a href="https://www.offensivecon.org/" target="_blank">OffensiveCon</a>. Outside of our <a href="https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Xj9Du8iuXCw" target="_blank">shipping troubles</a>, we had an amazing time and can’t wait to get back.</p><p class="">Last year, we added <strong>Artificial Intelligence</strong> as a category with great results. This year, we’re expanding this and splitting it into multiple different categories: AI Databases, Coding Agents, Local Inferences, and a separate category for NVIDIA products. In last year’s contest, NVIDIA targets had wins, losses, and collisions, so it will be interesting to see how they fare this year. The folks from <strong>AWS </strong>wanted to get into the fray as well, so they stepped up to co-sponsor this year’s event, which allows us to increase the reward for bugs in Firecracker. Of course, we have all of the returning categories as well, including web browsers, containers, servers, virtualization, and operating systems. There’s more than $1,000,000 in cash and prizes available for contestants. Last year, we awarded $1,078,750 for 28 unique 0-days over the three-day event. We’ll see if we can eclipse those numbers in 2026.</p><p class="">The contest begins on May 14, but registration closes on May 7, so don’t delay in getting those submissions in. We’re hoping for maximum participation, so set aside your vibe coding and show us what you can really do. We’re looking forward to some cutting-edge exploitation on display. For 2026, we have a total of 31 targets across 10 categories. Here is a full list of the categories for this year’s event:  </p>





















  
  



<p><a data-preserve-html-node="true" name="top"></a> 
<a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/3/11/announcing-pwn2own-berlin-for-2026#virtual">-- Virtualization</a><br><a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/3/11/announcing-pwn2own-berlin-for-2026#browser">-- Web Browser</a><br><a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/3/11/announcing-pwn2own-berlin-for-2026#entapps">-- Enterprise Applications</a><br><a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/3/11/announcing-pwn2own-berlin-for-2026#server">-- Servers</a><br><a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/3/11/announcing-pwn2own-berlin-for-2026#eop">-- Local Escalation of Privilege</a><br><a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/3/11/announcing-pwn2own-berlin-for-2026#container">-- Containers</a><br><a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/3/11/announcing-pwn2own-berlin-for-2026#aidb">-- AI Database</a><br><a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/3/11/announcing-pwn2own-berlin-for-2026#aicode">-- Coding Agents</a><br><a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/3/11/announcing-pwn2own-berlin-for-2026#ailocal">-- Local Inference</a><br><a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/3/11/announcing-pwn2own-berlin-for-2026#nvidia">-- NVIDIA</a>  </p>




  <p class="">Of course, no Pwn2Own competition would be complete without us crowning a Master of Pwn (Meister von Pwn?). Since the order of the contest is decided by a random draw, contestants with an unlucky draw could still demonstrate fantastic research but receive less money since subsequent rounds go down in value. However, the points awarded for each unique, successful entry do <em>not</em> go down. Someone could have a bad draw and still accumulate the most points. The person or team with the most points at the end of the contest will be crowned Master of Pwn, receive 65,000 ZDI reward points (enough for <a href="https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/about/benefits/" target="_blank">Platinum</a> status), a killer <a href="https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/t/5b8993b321c67c67b886f506/1535742910114/trophy.jpg" target="_blank">trophy</a>, and a <a href="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C6Z5iQQXEAEPQ0Q.jpg" target="_blank">pretty</a> <a href="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DNhpw_xUEAEkEwG.jpg" target="_blank">snazzy</a> <a href="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cu-6uFSWcAEefBS.jpg" target="_blank">jacket</a> to boot.</p><p class="">Let's look at the details of the rules for this year's event.</p>





















  
  



<p><a data-preserve-html-node="true" name="virtual"></a>  </p>
<p><b data-preserve-html-node="true">Virtualization Category</b> </p>




  <p class="">Some of the highlights for each contest can be found in the Virtualization Category, and we’re thrilled to see what this year’s event could bring with it. As usual, VMware is the main highlight of this category as we’ll have VMware ESXi return with an award of $150,000. Last year produced the first ESXi exploits in Pwn2Own history, so it will be interesting to see if we get more. Microsoft also returns as a target and leads the virtualization category with a $250,000 award for a successful Hyper-V Client guest-to-host escalation. Kernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM) is our final target in this category with a prize of $50,000.</p><p class="">There’s an add-on bonus in this category as well. If a contestant can escape the guest OS, then gain arbitrary code execution on the virtualization target <em>and</em> obtain arbitrary code execution in the guest operating system on a separate virtual machine managed by the same targeted virtualization target, they’ll earn another $50,000. That could push the payout on a ESXi bug to $200,000. This bonus is for KVM and ESXi only. Here’s a detailed look at the targets and available payouts in the Virtualization category:</p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
              
              
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/f1a17b36-ce06-47c8-8e58-3435b9bbdcc4/Slide1.jpeg" data-image-dimensions="1024x576" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/f1a17b36-ce06-47c8-8e58-3435b9bbdcc4/Slide1.jpeg?format=1000w" width="1024" height="576" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/f1a17b36-ce06-47c8-8e58-3435b9bbdcc4/Slide1.jpeg?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/f1a17b36-ce06-47c8-8e58-3435b9bbdcc4/Slide1.jpeg?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/f1a17b36-ce06-47c8-8e58-3435b9bbdcc4/Slide1.jpeg?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/f1a17b36-ce06-47c8-8e58-3435b9bbdcc4/Slide1.jpeg?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/f1a17b36-ce06-47c8-8e58-3435b9bbdcc4/Slide1.jpeg?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/f1a17b36-ce06-47c8-8e58-3435b9bbdcc4/Slide1.jpeg?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/f1a17b36-ce06-47c8-8e58-3435b9bbdcc4/Slide1.jpeg?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
            
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  


<p><a data-preserve-html-node="true" name="browser"></a>
<a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/3/11/announcing-pwn2own-berlin-for-2026#top"><i data-preserve-html-node="true">Back to top</i></a></p>
<p><b data-preserve-html-node="true">Web Browser Category</b></p>




  <p class="">While browsers are the “traditional” Pwn2Own target, we’re continuously tweaking the targets in this category to ensure they remain relevant. We re-introduced renderer-only exploits a couple of years ago, and this year, we’ve increased the award to $75,000. In fact, we’ve increased the awards across the board for this category. Here’s a detailed look at the targets and available payouts:</p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
              
              
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/d9ee752e-7f62-440b-818a-55fd6d94a2f0/Slide2.jpeg" data-image-dimensions="1024x576" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/d9ee752e-7f62-440b-818a-55fd6d94a2f0/Slide2.jpeg?format=1000w" width="1024" height="576" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/d9ee752e-7f62-440b-818a-55fd6d94a2f0/Slide2.jpeg?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/d9ee752e-7f62-440b-818a-55fd6d94a2f0/Slide2.jpeg?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/d9ee752e-7f62-440b-818a-55fd6d94a2f0/Slide2.jpeg?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/d9ee752e-7f62-440b-818a-55fd6d94a2f0/Slide2.jpeg?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/d9ee752e-7f62-440b-818a-55fd6d94a2f0/Slide2.jpeg?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/d9ee752e-7f62-440b-818a-55fd6d94a2f0/Slide2.jpeg?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/d9ee752e-7f62-440b-818a-55fd6d94a2f0/Slide2.jpeg?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
            
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  


<p><a data-preserve-html-node="true" name="entapps"></a>
<a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/3/11/announcing-pwn2own-berlin-for-2026#top"><i data-preserve-html-node="true">Back to top</i></a></p>
<p><b data-preserve-html-node="true">Enterprise Applications Category</b></p>




  <p class="">Enterprise applications return as targets with Adobe Reader and various Office components on the target list once again. Attempts in this category must be launched from the target under test. For example, launching the target under test from the command line is not allowed. Prizes in this category run from $50,000 for a Reader exploit with a sandbox escape or a Reader exploit with a kernel privilege escalation, and $150,000 for an Office 365 application. Word, Excel, and PowerPoint are all valid targets. Microsoft Office-based targets will have Protected View enabled where applicable. Adobe Reader will have Protected Mode enabled where applicable.</p><p class="">This year, we’re adding a bonus for Copilot data exfiltration and Copilot action execution. Microsoft just <a href="https://x.com/thezdi/status/2031496424488042681" target="_blank">patched</a> a bug like this in Excel, so we know they are out there. If you’re able to exploit Copilot in addition to a Microsoft application, you’ll earn an additional $50,000. There are quite a few rules and scenarios around this add-on, so be sure to read the rules carefully and contact us with questions. Here’s a detailed view of the targets and payouts in the Enterprise Application category:</p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
              
              
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ad7c5b03-1001-43ce-9144-be06b43ef9f6/entapps.jpg" data-image-dimensions="1024x576" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ad7c5b03-1001-43ce-9144-be06b43ef9f6/entapps.jpg?format=1000w" width="1024" height="576" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ad7c5b03-1001-43ce-9144-be06b43ef9f6/entapps.jpg?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ad7c5b03-1001-43ce-9144-be06b43ef9f6/entapps.jpg?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ad7c5b03-1001-43ce-9144-be06b43ef9f6/entapps.jpg?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ad7c5b03-1001-43ce-9144-be06b43ef9f6/entapps.jpg?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ad7c5b03-1001-43ce-9144-be06b43ef9f6/entapps.jpg?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ad7c5b03-1001-43ce-9144-be06b43ef9f6/entapps.jpg?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/ad7c5b03-1001-43ce-9144-be06b43ef9f6/entapps.jpg?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
            
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  


<p><a data-preserve-html-node="true" name="server"></a>
<a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/3/11/announcing-pwn2own-berlin-for-2026#top"><i data-preserve-html-node="true">Back to top</i></a></p>
<p><b data-preserve-html-node="true">The Server Category</b></p>




  <p class="">The Server Category for 2026 focuses solely on the server components we’re most interested in. These servers are often targeted by everyone from ransomware crews to nation/state actors, so we know there are exploits out there for them. The only question is whether we’ll see any of the competitors bring one of those exploits to Pwn2Own. Last year, the bugs demonstrated in SharePoint ended up being exploited in the wild, so we know people are looking for these with great interest. Microsoft Exchange has been a popular target for some time, and it returns as a target this year as well, with a payout of $200,000. This category is rounded out by Microsoft Windows RDP/RDS, which also has a payout of $200,000. Here’s a detailed look at the targets and payouts in the Server category:</p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
              
              
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/278211ce-a1e8-4258-b593-3faca48002e5/Slide4.jpeg" data-image-dimensions="1024x576" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/278211ce-a1e8-4258-b593-3faca48002e5/Slide4.jpeg?format=1000w" width="1024" height="576" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/278211ce-a1e8-4258-b593-3faca48002e5/Slide4.jpeg?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/278211ce-a1e8-4258-b593-3faca48002e5/Slide4.jpeg?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/278211ce-a1e8-4258-b593-3faca48002e5/Slide4.jpeg?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/278211ce-a1e8-4258-b593-3faca48002e5/Slide4.jpeg?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/278211ce-a1e8-4258-b593-3faca48002e5/Slide4.jpeg?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/278211ce-a1e8-4258-b593-3faca48002e5/Slide4.jpeg?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/278211ce-a1e8-4258-b593-3faca48002e5/Slide4.jpeg?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
            
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  


<p><a data-preserve-html-node="true" name="eop"></a>
<a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/3/11/announcing-pwn2own-berlin-for-2026#top"><i data-preserve-html-node="true">Back to top</i></a></p>
<p><b data-preserve-html-node="true">Local Escalation of Privilege Category</b></p>




  <p class="">This category is a classic for Pwn2Own and focuses on attacks that originate from a standard user and result in executing code as a high-privileged user. A successful entry in this category must leverage a kernel vulnerability to escalate privileges. Red Hat Enterprise Linux for Workstations returns as our Linux-based target, while Apple macOS, and Microsoft Windows 11 return as targets in this category. Prior exploits in this category have won Pwnie awards, so they’re always interesting to see. Here’s a detailed look at the targets and payouts in this category:</p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
              
              
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/127bc809-2387-4e40-ab0d-2c65175ca167/eop.jpg" data-image-dimensions="1024x576" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/127bc809-2387-4e40-ab0d-2c65175ca167/eop.jpg?format=1000w" width="1024" height="576" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/127bc809-2387-4e40-ab0d-2c65175ca167/eop.jpg?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/127bc809-2387-4e40-ab0d-2c65175ca167/eop.jpg?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/127bc809-2387-4e40-ab0d-2c65175ca167/eop.jpg?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/127bc809-2387-4e40-ab0d-2c65175ca167/eop.jpg?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/127bc809-2387-4e40-ab0d-2c65175ca167/eop.jpg?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/127bc809-2387-4e40-ab0d-2c65175ca167/eop.jpg?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/127bc809-2387-4e40-ab0d-2c65175ca167/eop.jpg?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
            
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  


<p><a data-preserve-html-node="true" name="container"></a>
<a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/3/11/announcing-pwn2own-berlin-for-2026#top"><i data-preserve-html-node="true">Back to top</i></a></p>
<p><b data-preserve-html-node="true">The Container Category</b></p>




  <p class="">We’re excited to have this category return for its third season, and we’re hopeful that even more contestants will target one of these container targets. For an attempt to be ruled a success against these three, the exploit must be launched from within the guest container/microVM and execute arbitrary code on the host operating system. Again, with help from AWS, Firecracker returns as a target with a prize of $100,000. Here are the targets and payouts for this category:</p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
              
              
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/742779a4-1563-4aa4-bb59-8f189c8eb231/Containers2.jpg" data-image-dimensions="1024x576" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/742779a4-1563-4aa4-bb59-8f189c8eb231/Containers2.jpg?format=1000w" width="1024" height="576" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/742779a4-1563-4aa4-bb59-8f189c8eb231/Containers2.jpg?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/742779a4-1563-4aa4-bb59-8f189c8eb231/Containers2.jpg?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/742779a4-1563-4aa4-bb59-8f189c8eb231/Containers2.jpg?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/742779a4-1563-4aa4-bb59-8f189c8eb231/Containers2.jpg?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/742779a4-1563-4aa4-bb59-8f189c8eb231/Containers2.jpg?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/742779a4-1563-4aa4-bb59-8f189c8eb231/Containers2.jpg?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/742779a4-1563-4aa4-bb59-8f189c8eb231/Containers2.jpg?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
            
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  


<p><a data-preserve-html-node="true" name="aidb"></a>
<a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/3/11/announcing-pwn2own-berlin-for-2026#top"><i data-preserve-html-node="true">Back to top</i></a></p>
<p><b data-preserve-html-node="true">AI Database Category</b></p>




  <p class="">In the past, AI Hackathons have focused on using AI to develop vulnerabilities or other offensive frameworks. We’re opening up the models and various components themselves for exploitation. The first AI sub-category focuses on databases. An attempt in this category must be launched from the contestant’s laptop. Here’s a look at the targets and awards in the AI Database category:</p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
              
              
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/d88dfd8d-1260-41d0-bbb2-389c6550a962/aidb.jpg" data-image-dimensions="1024x576" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/d88dfd8d-1260-41d0-bbb2-389c6550a962/aidb.jpg?format=1000w" width="1024" height="576" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/d88dfd8d-1260-41d0-bbb2-389c6550a962/aidb.jpg?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/d88dfd8d-1260-41d0-bbb2-389c6550a962/aidb.jpg?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/d88dfd8d-1260-41d0-bbb2-389c6550a962/aidb.jpg?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/d88dfd8d-1260-41d0-bbb2-389c6550a962/aidb.jpg?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/d88dfd8d-1260-41d0-bbb2-389c6550a962/aidb.jpg?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/d88dfd8d-1260-41d0-bbb2-389c6550a962/aidb.jpg?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/d88dfd8d-1260-41d0-bbb2-389c6550a962/aidb.jpg?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
            
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  


<p><a data-preserve-html-node="true" name="aicode"></a>
<a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/3/11/announcing-pwn2own-berlin-for-2026#top"><i data-preserve-html-node="true">Back to top</i></a></p>
<p><b data-preserve-html-node="true">The Coding Agent Category</b></p>




  <p class="">Let’s face it. At some point or another, we’ve probably all vibe coded something. There’s no shame in that, but how secure are the tools we use for vibe coding? Well, let’s take the most popular choices and find out. A successful entry must interact with a contestant-controlled resource (e.g. web page, repository, media file) to exploit a vulnerability within the coding agent. The attack vector of the entry must be a common coding agent use case. There are few things out of scope here as well. UI spoofing or misrepresentation unrelated to permission prompts, model jailbreaks or prompt outputs that do not cross security boundaries, and vulnerabilities that require unsafe or permission-less modes are just a few of the things not allowed. As this is a new category, please read the rules carefully to ensure your entry qualifies. Here’s a look at the targets and awards in the AI Coding Agent category:</p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
              
              
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/8bb9ea99-c1b3-4567-97cb-db2395131a77/Slide8.jpeg" data-image-dimensions="1024x576" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/8bb9ea99-c1b3-4567-97cb-db2395131a77/Slide8.jpeg?format=1000w" width="1024" height="576" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/8bb9ea99-c1b3-4567-97cb-db2395131a77/Slide8.jpeg?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/8bb9ea99-c1b3-4567-97cb-db2395131a77/Slide8.jpeg?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/8bb9ea99-c1b3-4567-97cb-db2395131a77/Slide8.jpeg?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/8bb9ea99-c1b3-4567-97cb-db2395131a77/Slide8.jpeg?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/8bb9ea99-c1b3-4567-97cb-db2395131a77/Slide8.jpeg?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/8bb9ea99-c1b3-4567-97cb-db2395131a77/Slide8.jpeg?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/8bb9ea99-c1b3-4567-97cb-db2395131a77/Slide8.jpeg?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
            
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  


<p><a data-preserve-html-node="true" name="ailocal"></a>
<a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/3/11/announcing-pwn2own-berlin-for-2026#top"><i data-preserve-html-node="true">Back to top</i></a></p>
<p><b data-preserve-html-node="true">The Local Inference Category</b></p>




  <p class="">We couldn’t leave local inference and LLMs out of Pwn2Own. These products claim to provide enhanced data privacy, zero-cost inference, lower latency, and fully offline functionality. We’ll see how the security stacks up. An attempt in this category must be launched from the contestant’s laptop within the contest network. Here are the targets and payouts for the Local Inference category:</p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
              
              
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/33770fe8-49c1-425f-83e5-2b141bd2f4e0/Slide9.jpeg" data-image-dimensions="1024x576" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/33770fe8-49c1-425f-83e5-2b141bd2f4e0/Slide9.jpeg?format=1000w" width="1024" height="576" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/33770fe8-49c1-425f-83e5-2b141bd2f4e0/Slide9.jpeg?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/33770fe8-49c1-425f-83e5-2b141bd2f4e0/Slide9.jpeg?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/33770fe8-49c1-425f-83e5-2b141bd2f4e0/Slide9.jpeg?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/33770fe8-49c1-425f-83e5-2b141bd2f4e0/Slide9.jpeg?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/33770fe8-49c1-425f-83e5-2b141bd2f4e0/Slide9.jpeg?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/33770fe8-49c1-425f-83e5-2b141bd2f4e0/Slide9.jpeg?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/33770fe8-49c1-425f-83e5-2b141bd2f4e0/Slide9.jpeg?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
            
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  


<p><a data-preserve-html-node="true" name="nvidia"></a>
<a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/3/11/announcing-pwn2own-berlin-for-2026#top"><i data-preserve-html-node="true">Back to top</i></a></p>
<p><b data-preserve-html-node="true">The NVIDIA Category</b></p>




  <p class="">Our last AI sub-category focuses solely on NVIDIA products. For network accessible targets, an attempt must be launched from the contestant's laptop within the contest network. For NV Container Toolkit, the attempt must be launched from within a crafted container image and execute arbitrary code on the host operating system. For Megatron Bridge, entries that leverage vulnerabilities pertaining to pickle deserialization or that leverage a vulnerability when “trust_remote_code=true” are out of scope. Here are the targets and payouts for the NVIDIA category:</p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
              
              
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/077616af-de47-4235-a621-a8bf07c8295e/nvidia3.jpg" data-image-dimensions="1024x576" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/077616af-de47-4235-a621-a8bf07c8295e/nvidia3.jpg?format=1000w" width="1024" height="576" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/077616af-de47-4235-a621-a8bf07c8295e/nvidia3.jpg?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/077616af-de47-4235-a621-a8bf07c8295e/nvidia3.jpg?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/077616af-de47-4235-a621-a8bf07c8295e/nvidia3.jpg?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/077616af-de47-4235-a621-a8bf07c8295e/nvidia3.jpg?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/077616af-de47-4235-a621-a8bf07c8295e/nvidia3.jpg?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/077616af-de47-4235-a621-a8bf07c8295e/nvidia3.jpg?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/077616af-de47-4235-a621-a8bf07c8295e/nvidia3.jpg?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
            
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  


<p><a data-preserve-html-node="true" href="https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2026/3/11/announcing-pwn2own-berlin-for-2026#top"><i data-preserve-html-node="true">Back to top</i></a></p>




  <p class=""><strong>Conclusion</strong></p><p class="">The complete rules for Pwn2Own Berlin 2026 are found <a href="https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/Pwn2OwnBerlin2026Rules.html" target="_blank">here</a>. As always, we <strong>highly</strong> encourage entrants to read the rules thoroughly if they choose to participate. If you are thinking about participating but have specific configuration or rule-related questions, <a href="mailto:pwn2own@trendmicro.com?subject=Pwn2Own%20Berlin%202026%20Question" target="_blank">email</a> us. Questions asked over X (nee Twitter), BlueSky, or other means will not be answered. Registration is required to ensure we have sufficient resources on hand at the event. Please contact ZDI at <a href="mailto:pwn2own@trendmicro.com">pwn2own@trendmicro.com</a> to begin the registration process. Registration for onsite participation closes at 5 p.m. Central European Time on May 7, 2026.</p><p class="">Be sure to stay tuned to this blog and follow us on <a href="https://www.twitter.com/thezdi" target="_blank">Twitter</a>, <a href="https://infosec.exchange/@thezdi" target="_blank">Mastodon</a>, <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/zerodayinitiative" target="_blank">LinkedIn</a>, or <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/thezdi.bsky.social" target="_blank">Bluesky</a> for the latest information and updates about the contest. We look forward to seeing everyone in Germany, and we hope to see some of the best in the world show what they can do – vibe coded or not.</p><p class="">With special thanks to our Pwn2Own Berlin 2026 partners AWS, for providing their expertise and technology.</p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/f5332a6b-e3d2-42e1-bb98-4e9c9de46536/Amazon_Web_Services-Logo.wine.png" data-image-dimensions="3000x2000" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/f5332a6b-e3d2-42e1-bb98-4e9c9de46536/Amazon_Web_Services-Logo.wine.png?format=1000w" width="3000" height="2000" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/f5332a6b-e3d2-42e1-bb98-4e9c9de46536/Amazon_Web_Services-Logo.wine.png?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/f5332a6b-e3d2-42e1-bb98-4e9c9de46536/Amazon_Web_Services-Logo.wine.png?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/f5332a6b-e3d2-42e1-bb98-4e9c9de46536/Amazon_Web_Services-Logo.wine.png?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/f5332a6b-e3d2-42e1-bb98-4e9c9de46536/Amazon_Web_Services-Logo.wine.png?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/f5332a6b-e3d2-42e1-bb98-4e9c9de46536/Amazon_Web_Services-Logo.wine.png?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/f5332a6b-e3d2-42e1-bb98-4e9c9de46536/Amazon_Web_Services-Logo.wine.png?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/f5332a6b-e3d2-42e1-bb98-4e9c9de46536/Amazon_Web_Services-Logo.wine.png?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  





  <p class="">© 2026 Trend Micro Incorporated. All rights reserved. PWN2OWN, ZERO DAY INITIATIVE, ZDI, ZERO DAY INITIATIVE, TrendAI, and Trend Micro are trademarks or registered trademarks of Trend Micro Incorporated. All other trademarks and trade names are the property of their respective owners.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Researcher Claims Working Jailbreak on Top AI Models Including GPT-5.6, Claude Opus 5, and Fable]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A well-known AI red teamer claims to have developed a universal jailbreak that works against leading large language models, including heavily guarded flagships such as GPT-5.6 Sol, Claude Opus 5, and Fable. In a public post on X, Pliny the Liberator described the technique as effective “on ALL mo...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694442/it-security-nachrichten/researcher-claims-working-jailbreak-on-top-ai-models-including-gpt-56-claude-opus-5-and-fable/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694442/it-security-nachrichten/researcher-claims-working-jailbreak-on-top-ai-models-including-gpt-56-claude-opus-5-and-fable/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:00:18 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A well-known AI red teamer claims to have developed a universal jailbreak that works against leading large language models, including heavily guarded flagships such as GPT-5.6 Sol, Claude Opus 5, and Fable. In a public post on X, Pliny the Liberator described the technique as effective “on ALL models” and across every category he tested. […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cybersecuritynews.com/jailbreak-on-top-ai-models/">Researcher Claims Working Jailbreak on Top AI Models Including GPT-5.6, Claude Opus 5, and Fable</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cybersecuritynews.com/">Cyber Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Schnell wie ein Toilettengang: Wie funktioniert Megawattladen?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag Schnell wie ein Toilettengang: Wie funktioniert Megawattladen? erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
In wenigen Minuten Strom für Hunderte Kilometer Reichweite oder einen Lkw während d...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694433/it-security-nachrichten/schnell-wie-ein-toilettengang-wie-funktioniert-megawattladen/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694433/it-security-nachrichten/schnell-wie-ein-toilettengang-wie-funktioniert-megawattladen/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:59:45 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/24/wie-funktioniert-megawattladen/">Schnell wie ein Toilettengang: Wie funktioniert Megawattladen?</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>In wenigen Minuten Strom für Hunderte Kilometer Reichweite oder einen Lkw während der Pause voll laden: Das soll das sogenannte Megawattladen möglich machen. 2025 eröffneten die ersten Stationen in Europa. Wir verraten dir, wie die Technologie funktioniert.  Elektrofahrzeuge schneller laden zu können, bringt für Pkw mehr Reisekomfort und mehr Wirtschaftlichkeit für Lkw im Fernverkehr. Um […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/24/wie-funktioniert-megawattladen/">Schnell wie ein Toilettengang: Wie funktioniert Megawattladen?</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Krieg der Sterne: Wie Hotels und Restaurants ihre Google-Bewertungen frisieren]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag Krieg der Sterne: Wie Hotels und Restaurants ihre Google-Bewertungen frisieren erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Wer ein Restaurant oder Hotel auf Google Maps sucht, orientiert sic...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694434/it-security-nachrichten/krieg-der-sterne-wie-hotels-und-restaurants-ihre-google-bewertungen-frisieren/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694434/it-security-nachrichten/krieg-der-sterne-wie-hotels-und-restaurants-ihre-google-bewertungen-frisieren/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:59:45 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/23/google-bewertungen-geloescht/">Krieg der Sterne: Wie Hotels und Restaurants ihre Google-Bewertungen frisieren</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Wer ein Restaurant oder Hotel auf Google Maps sucht, orientiert sich an den Sternebewertungen. Doch eine dpa-Stichprobe zeigt, dass allein in Hessen 17 Prozent der Gastbetriebe bereits Rezensionen haben löschen lassen – in Frankfurt sogar fast jeder Dritte. Der Grund: Was als Schutz vor Diffamierung gedacht war, ist längst zu einem Reputationswerkzeug verkommen. Seit April […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/23/google-bewertungen-geloescht/">Krieg der Sterne: Wie Hotels und Restaurants ihre Google-Bewertungen frisieren</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Claude Cowork kann dich beim arbeiten beobachten – um deinen Job zu erledigen]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag Claude Cowork kann dich beim arbeiten beobachten – um deinen Job zu erledigen erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Anthropic hat eine neue Funktion für Claude Cowork vorgestellt: Reco...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694431/it-security-nachrichten/claude-cowork-kann-dich-beim-arbeiten-beobachten-um-deinen-job-zu-erledigen/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694431/it-security-nachrichten/claude-cowork-kann-dich-beim-arbeiten-beobachten-um-deinen-job-zu-erledigen/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:59:44 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/25/claude-cowork-skill-aufzeichnen/">Claude Cowork kann dich beim arbeiten beobachten – um deinen Job zu erledigen</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Anthropic hat eine neue Funktion für Claude Cowork vorgestellt: Record a Skill, zu Deutsch: einen Skill aufzeichnen. Nutzer können sich dabei selbst beim Arbeiten aufzeichnen. Claude lernt dann daraus eine wiederholbare Fähigkeit, um Aufgaben für dich zu erledigen. Die Reaktionen reichen von Begeisterung bis zu Jobsorgen.  So schnell wie KI-Anwendungen neue Funktionen bekommen, können Nutzer […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/25/claude-cowork-skill-aufzeichnen/">Claude Cowork kann dich beim arbeiten beobachten – um deinen Job zu erledigen</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[OpenAI verliert Kontrolle über seine KI – und macht einen PR-Stunt draus]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag OpenAI verliert Kontrolle über seine KI – und macht einen PR-Stunt draus erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
OpenAI hat einen „beispiellosen Cybervorfall“ eingeräumt. KI-Modelle des ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694432/it-security-nachrichten/openai-verliert-kontrolle-ueber-seine-ki-und-macht-einen-pr-stunt-draus/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694432/it-security-nachrichten/openai-verliert-kontrolle-ueber-seine-ki-und-macht-einen-pr-stunt-draus/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:59:44 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/24/openai-verliert-kontrolle-ueber-ki/">OpenAI verliert Kontrolle über seine KI – und macht einen PR-Stunt draus</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>OpenAI hat einen „beispiellosen Cybervorfall“ eingeräumt. KI-Modelle des Unternehmens sollen eigenständig aus einer Testumgebung ausgebrochen sein und sich Zugang zum offenen Internet verschafft haben. Anschließend hackten sie ein anderes Unternehmen. Politik, Wirtschaft und KI-Szene zeigen sich schockiert. Der Fall offenbart große Risiken durch autonome KI-Agenten, dürfte aber auch Teil eines geschickten PR-Manövers sein. Denn: OpenAI […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/24/openai-verliert-kontrolle-ueber-ki/">OpenAI verliert Kontrolle über seine KI – und macht einen PR-Stunt draus</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AI success requires a full-stack CIO]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Every CIO I speak with today is wrestling with some version of the same question: How do we move faster with AI and deliver on our commitments?



It’s an understandable concern. Boards and CEOs are asking about AI. Business leaders are experimenting with use cases. Employees are discovering tool...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694399/it-security-nachrichten/ai-success-requires-a-full-stack-cio/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694399/it-security-nachrichten/ai-success-requires-a-full-stack-cio/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:57:42 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Every CIO I speak with today is wrestling with some version of the same question: How do we move faster with AI and deliver on our commitments?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It’s an understandable concern. <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4171959/ceos-top-priorities-for-it-leaders-today-2.html">Boards and CEOs are asking about AI</a>. Business leaders are experimenting with use cases. Employees are discovering tools daily, while technology vendors promise unprecedented gains in productivity, innovation, and competitive advantage.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">After hundreds of conversations with technology executives over the past year, I’ve become convinced that speed isn’t the real issue. The organizations pulling away from the pack aren’t necessarily adopting AI faster than everyone else. They’re executing more effectively — a subtle distinction that represents one of the defining leadership challenges of the AI era.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Technology has never been the hardest part of transformation. People, priorities, culture, and operating models are the biggest challenges. The ability to translate bold boardroom aspirations into thousands of thoughtful decisions made every day by architects, engineers, product managers, analysts, and business leaders is where competitive advantage is created. AI may be accelerating the pace of change, but it hasn’t changed that fundamental truth.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I’ve met plenty of executives who are exceptional in the boardroom. They know how to frame a vision, <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/272180/relationship-building-networking-how-to-wow-your-board-of-directors.html">influence a board</a>, and build confidence among investors and business leaders. I’ve also met remarkable technologists who instinctively understand the architectural decisions, engineering tradeoffs, and implementation details that determine how great ideas become reality. Modern CIOs, however, must move comfortably between both worlds. Afshean Talasaz is one who stands out among this rare breed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Long before becoming CIO of Colonial Pipeline, Talasaz built his career from the ground up as a business professional, data scientist, and technologist. He has designed enterprise platforms, built AI capabilities, led technology organizations, and partnered closely with executive leadership teams on business transformation. Today, as an executive in residence with our Practitioners for Practitioners (P4P) community, he helps CIOs and business leaders navigate one of the most significant technology shifts of our generation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While Talasaz brings deep knowledge of data and AI to the table, his greatest strength is his ability to create strategy and connect it with execution. He can spend the morning discussing enterprise reinvention with the board and the afternoon debating architectural principles with the teams responsible for bringing that vision to life.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That versatility gives Talasaz a unique lens on how CIOs <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4178006/state-of-the-cio-2026-cios-set-the-course-for-ai-roi.html">can deliver value with AI</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Software companies have a term for engineers who understand every layer of the technology stack: full-stack developers. Listen to Talasaz and it becomes evident that the AI era requires something similar from technology leaders: a full-stack CIO.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The full-stack CIO: Leading with clarity</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A full-stack CIO understands how every layer of the enterprise influences the next. They recognize that every strategic priority becomes a portfolio investment, every investment shapes an operating model, every operating model influences architecture, every architecture choice informs product decisions, every product decision shapes engineering priorities.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The best CIOs understand both ends of that journey. The extraordinary ones understand everything in between.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And those who execute best lead with clarity, Talasaz says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Everyone, from executives to middle managers to the people writing code, should be able to explain what we’re trying to achieve,” he emphasizes. “Clarity isn’t that we’ve handed out the PowerPoint. It’s that people genuinely understand where we’re going and can articulate it in their own language.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One of the unintended consequences of the AI boom is that organizations are beginning to confuse activity with alignment. They have AI councils, AI governance committees, AI innovation labs, AI centers of excellence, AI pilots, and AI roadmaps. Yet if you stop ten people in the hallway and ask a deceptively simple question, What business problem are we actually trying to solve? you’ll often hear ten different answers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As a result, architects optimize for one objective while product teams optimize for another. Business units pursue opportunities that seem perfectly reasonable from their perspective. Engineers make thoughtful technical decisions based on the information available to them. Individually, none of those decisions are necessarily wrong. Collectively, however, they create organizational drift. AI doesn’t create that problem. It simply accelerates the consequences.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And while AI can be a force multiplier for the positive when every decision is guided by a shared understanding of where the organization is headed, it can also be a force multiplier for the negative, resulting in an organization simply moving faster in different directions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“When we have the fundamentals right, the tech infrastructure, the operating models, the nuances of how our business actually runs, we get the impacts of AI in a positive way,” Talasaz says. “When we don’t have those in place, AI can amplify the gaps or mute the benefits.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">At a time when so much of the conversation surrounding AI is focused on algorithms, agents, and automation, it’s an important reminder that organizations don’t execute strategy; people do.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Reducing organizational friction</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most executives are familiar with the concept of VUCA that characterizes today’s business environment. But Talasaz stresses the importance of turning this concern inward: “If the world outside our organizations is becoming more volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous, what are we, as leaders, doing to the inside of our organizations?”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Leaders spend enormous amounts of time helping their organizations respond to external disruption but comparatively little time asking whether they are inadvertently re-creating those same conditions internally in response to those external needs. Are we reducing uncertainty or introducing more of it? Are we simplifying work or adding unnecessary complexity? Are we helping people focus on what matters most, or asking them to navigate competing priorities and shifting expectations?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Talasaz refers to this phenomenon as double VUCA — something I’ve witnessed repeatedly while working with CIOs over the past decade. Organizations often assume they’re struggling because of technology limitations when the real constraint is organizational friction. Teams wait for decisions. Priorities shift faster than roadmaps. Governance grows heavier. New committees are formed to solve problems created by existing committees. Everyone is working harder, yet the organization somehow feels slower.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI amplifies both outcomes. Organizations with clarity become dramatically more effective because AI accelerates good decisions. Organizations without clarity simply accelerate confusion.</p>



<h1 class="wp-block-heading">Operating model as strategy enabler</h1>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI governance is one way to achieve greater clarity, but as Talasaz says, governance shouldn’t primarily exist inside policy manuals that few people read.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Instead, AI governance should be embedded in the daily rhythms of the organization, shaping how teams collaborate, how decisions are made, how products move from ideas into production, and how innovation happens safely without requiring constant escalation. In other words, it’s all about your operating model.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“If you had to pick one thing that isn’t technology, your operating model is the most important element for executing data and AI at scale,” he says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The best operating models create enough clarity that capable people can make thousands of decisions independently and confidently, without having to wait for permission. By embedding good governance into the way it works, the organization becomes faster.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This advice echoes something I’ve heard repeatedly from some of the world’s most respected CIOs: High-performing organizations aren’t built on tighter control; they’re built on greater trust, supported by clear principles, shared expectations, and operating models that enable responsible decision-making at every level of the enterprise.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Talasaz points out that technology leaders tend to speak in terms of <em>transformation</em>. He suggests CIOs consider a different word: <em>reinvention.</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As he explains, transformation implies replacing what exists today with something new. Reinvention starts with a more clear-eyed and practical premise: Some things absolutely must change; others represent years, sometimes decades, of accumulated expertise, customer trust, operational discipline, and competitive advantage.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Reinvention is about building on those strengths while also creating new ways to deliver value. The leaders making the greatest progress in their AI journeys seem to recognize that it’s less about abandoning the past than thoughtfully preparing the organization for the future.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Closing the gap between strategy and execution</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Full-stack CIOs must be able to map out the various layers of execution and planning that need to be done at every level of the organization to be successful. To help with this, Talasaz has developed a data and AI framework that draws on his own experiences “from the keyboard to the boardroom.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As Talasaz sees it, too many organizations have been doing good work in isolation. “They’re doing a lot of the right things,” he says. “They’re just not connected.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Boards may be discussing growth while business leaders redesign customer experiences. Product teams may be prioritizing new capabilities while architects modernize platforms. Data teams may be improving quality while engineers focus on delivery. Every group makes meaningful progress within its own domain, yet somewhere between strategy and execution, the connective tissue begins to disappear. Talasaz’s framework brings those connecting points to the forefront.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Crucially, the framework doesn’t begin with technology or AI or even with data. It begins with the experiences the organization hopes to create for its customers, employees, or partners. Many AI initiatives start with the question, “What can this technology do?” And indeed, we need to be inspired by the possibilities and challenged to think differently by what the technology can do. But, Talasaz emphasizes, we also need to ask what experiences we need to deliver for our business and how the technology can make that a reality.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The framework challenges CIOs to answer that question first. Only after the experiences are clearly defined does the conversation move to the capabilities required to deliver it, the business activities that support those capabilities, the AI and data products that enable them, and finally the data foundation that makes everything possible.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This shift in perspective ensures that, rather than allowing technology investments to search for business value, the business experience defines the technology required to deliver it. For CIOs, that’s more than a planning exercise. It’s a fundamentally different way of leading.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Over the coming months, the P4P community will be convening a series of small CxO roundtables to explore these issues and work more deeply with Afshean Talasaz’s 6×6 Data and AI Framework. CIOs and other enterprise leaders interested in participating are welcome to <a href="mailto:droberts@ouellette-online.com?subject=P4P:%206x6%20Framework%20Roundtable">reach out to me directly</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Principles every enterprise must test before the attack arrives]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I haven’t slept much in the past few weeks. Not because of some theoretical cyber risk that keeps many executives awake, but because reality just delivered a real wake-up call to our industry — a call that every executive must answer, now.



Imagine this: A major global enterprise, a company mos...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694398/it-security-nachrichten/principles-every-enterprise-must-test-before-the-attack-arrives/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694398/it-security-nachrichten/principles-every-enterprise-must-test-before-the-attack-arrives/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:55:54 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I haven’t slept much in the past few weeks. Not because of some theoretical cyber risk that keeps many executives awake, but because reality just delivered a real wake-up call to our industry — a call that every executive must answer, now.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Imagine this: A major global enterprise, a company most of us interact with indirectly every single day, wakes up to find its entire digital environment obliterated. Thousands of employees in dozens of offices and remote locations are suddenly offline. Customers are cut off, supply chains grind to a halt and regulators are notified with a chilling admission: “We have no idea when we’ll be back.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This wasn’t ransomware. There was no negotiation, no decryption key to buy, no easy way out. It was destruction — deliberate, coordinated and geopolitically motivated — not monetary.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As a chief customer officer who’s worked with countless customers on cyberattack risks, my perspective hits a bit differently than a CISO or a CTO. I see the aftermath, not just the attack surface. I see the faces behind the tickets, the operations team locked out of their own systems, the support agent answering panicked calls at dawn. And I ask: How many organizations have actually stress-tested their response to this scenario — not a hypothetical, but this very real, lights-out event? Here’s what every leader needs to confront today:</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Recovery is not just a technical exercise</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The first assumption to break during a real crisis is <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4165019/your-cloud-strategy-is-incomplete-without-a-cyber-recovery-plan.html">the belief that recovery is purely technical</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many organizations have done tabletop exercises and have a backup and recovery playbook, so they feel prepared. They can <a>point to</a> backup windows, retention schedules and immutability controls. The moment a true blackout happens, a different reality surfaces. The people who own the recovery steps either do not know each other, lack the authority to make decisions without supervisor approval or need guidance from offline systems.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The reality is that technical infrastructure almost always holds up better than human infrastructure. Organizations have built their recovery strategy around the assumption that someone competent will be awake, available and empowered when a cyber event happens.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Still, backups are only as good as their independence. Let’s be blunt: If your recovery infrastructure shares identity, authentication or network trust with your Microsoft tenant (such as Azure, Microsoft 365 or Teams), you don’t actually have a recovery plan; you have a false sense of one — and a liability. A <a href="https://www.veeam.com/company/press-release/veeam-report-reveals-a-market-wide-shift-from-recovery-confidence-to-proven-data-resilience-amid-ransomware-threats-and-ai-adoption.html">recent survey</a> found that while 90% of organizations express confidence in their ability to recover from a cyber incident, fewer than one in three ransomware victims fully recovered their data.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">True resilience means immutable, air-gapped backups, untouchable by the same compromise. Anything less is an illusion. I talk to customers about their recovery plans constantly. The customers who have rehearsed all scenarios sleep soundly. Those who haven’t? They’re rolling the dice.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Most business continuity plans ignore ‘total blackout’</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I’ve reviewed hundreds of business continuity plans. Almost all assume partial failures — a region, an application, a data center. But what if every system, in every country, goes dark simultaneously? That’s an entirely different playbook. If your team hasn’t run a drill for a global, simultaneous outage, you’re not prepared. The probability is low, but the cost of being unready is existential.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Connected devices, OT systems, field hardware, partner integrations — they all plug into your enterprise network. When the core collapses, it’s not just IT at risk. It’s operational technology, physical safety systems and in regulated sectors, potentially human lives. Understanding and testing those interdependencies is non-negotiable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is also where boards need to change the conversation. A <a href="https://www.diligent.com/resources/research/cybersecurity-audit">study found</a> that only 5% of companies have cybersecurity experts on their board of directors. Recovery time objectives (RTOs) should not be buried in technical appendices. It’s all jargon to boards. That makes translation essential. RTOs must be explained in terms of business impact. “We can recover in four hours” is a technical statement. “Every hour of downtime costs us $2.3M and creates regulatory exposure in three jurisdictions” is a board statement.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is the level of clarity leaders need.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The most prepared organizations do not wait for an incident to educate the board. They bring the conversation forward proactively. They frame recovery in business terms: revenue, regulatory standing, customer trust and brand reputation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The most effective framing is often simple. Show the most critical systems. Show what happens if each one is down for one hour, four hours, 24 hours and 72 hours. Show the current recovery capability against each and then show the gap.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If your board is not demanding real answers, your business continuity strategy is likely underfunded and your business is exposed. This is a risk conversation worth forcing because the consequences do not stay inside IT. They can show up in customer churn or missed revenue and ruin an organization’s reputation.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Threat intelligence must be actionable, not archived</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Geopolitical attacks, hacktivist campaigns and nation-state targeting aren’t abstract threats. They are active risks, and that intelligence cannot languish in the security team’s inbox. Executive leadership must be looped in — and immediately — so gaps can be closed before they’re exploited. Too often, intelligence enters the security operations function and never reaches the teams responsible for recovery infrastructure or executive decision-making.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If a threat actor is targeting a specific class of backup agents, the team responsible for those agents needs to know now, not two weeks from now. If intelligence suggests destructive activity against a sector, recovery owners need to validate isolation, access paths and restoration procedures immediately. If geopolitical tension increases the likelihood of targeting, executive leadership needs to understand what exposure exists and what actions are being taken. The organizations that survive aren’t just the best at incident response. They’re the ones who anticipated, rehearsed and invested <em>before</em> the attack.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Part of investing in a recovery strategy requires closing the loop between signal and action. The most prepared organizations have already mapped their critical recovery dependencies to specific threat categories. When intelligence touches one of those categories, there is a named owner and a clear set of actions. No guessing or forwarding emails into the void is needed because the distance between the warning and the employees’ ability to do something is shortened.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Looking ahead, the conversation will continue to evolve beyond traditional cyber response. Because in an AI-enabled enterprise, the new question is whether the data within those systems can still be trusted. When AI systems make decisions based on enterprise data, the attack surface becomes the data’s accuracy. A threat actor who quietly corrupts a dataset over 90 days before a recovery event has done more damage than just downtime. They can poison the inputs driving decisions across the business.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Regardless of how AI will change threat intelligence and cyber response, these principles remain the same. Know your problem, whether structural or technological. Ensure your human infrastructure keeps pace with your technical infrastructure, with clear cross-functional ownership and the tools and knowledge to act autonomously. Communicate with your boards often — and correctly.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Let’s not wait for the next headline to ask, “Are we ready?” Have those conversations <em>now</em>. Test your assumptions. Close your gaps. Because in today’s threat landscape, resilience isn’t IT’s job — it’s everyone’s mandate.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Stop asking AI nicely: Here’s how to get work-ready results every time]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Over the past few years, I have learned that basic prompts produce inconsistent, hallucination-prone results that no executive would trust in production. What turned the tide was my move to advanced prompting techniques. These weren’t theoretical experiments; they became a practical foundation fo...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694396/it-security-nachrichten/stop-asking-ai-nicely-heres-how-to-get-work-ready-results-every-time/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694396/it-security-nachrichten/stop-asking-ai-nicely-heres-how-to-get-work-ready-results-every-time/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:55:51 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Over the past few years, I have learned that basic prompts produce inconsistent, hallucination-prone results that no executive would trust in production. What turned the tide was my move to advanced prompting techniques. These weren’t theoretical experiments; they became a practical foundation for reliable, measurable outcomes. I want to share the techniques that consistently delivered the biggest gains in my projects, complete with real before-and-after examples, copy-paste templates, lessons from failures and guidance on when to evolve beyond prompting to agentic systems.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why advanced prompting still matters in enterprise settings</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Sophisticated prompting remains essential for control, reliability and compliance. If you “ask nicely” and hope for the best, you need deterministic behavior, auditable reasoning and minimal risk of hallucination. Here’s what worked for me.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">1. Chain-of-Thought (CoT) and its variants: Unlocking step-by-step reasoning</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>The problem:</strong> Models would jump to conclusions on complex analysis tasks, especially involving data interpretation or multi-step logic.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>What I did:</strong> I started explicitly instructing the model to “think step by step” and show its reasoning.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Before (basic prompt): </strong>“Analyze last quarter’s sales data and recommend three actions.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>After (CoT prompt):</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“You’re a senior business analyst. Analyze the following sales data step by step: [data]. First, identify the key trends. Second, calculate the rates and anomalies. Third, link findings to business context. Finally, recommend the three prioritized actions with expected impact. Explain your reasoning at each step.”  </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Results:</strong> Accuracy and depth improved dramatically.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Variants that worked well:</strong> Self-consistency. I ran the same CoT prompt multiple times and took the majority consensus. This reduced variability significantly.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Template you can use:</strong></p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>You are [expert role]. Solve this problem by thinking step by step.

[Task or question]

For each step:

1. State your observation or calculation.

2. Explain the implication.

3. Proceed only when confident.

Final answer in this format: [structured output]</code></pre>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">2. Tree-of-Thoughts (ToT): Exploring multiple reasoning paths</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For truly complex decisions such as resource allocation or risk assessment, linear CoT isn’t enough. Tree-of-Thoughts lets the model generate and evaluate multiple branches.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Example:</strong> I was helping a client evaluate three potential vendor platforms for an AI deployment. A standard prompt gave a superficial comparison. With ToT</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Prompt Snippet:</strong></p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>Explore three different reasoning paths for selecting the best vendor platform:

Path 1: Focus on cost and scalability.

Path 2: Focus on security, compliance and integration.

Path 3: Focus on innovation and long-term roadmap.

For each path, evaluate pros/cons against our requirements [list].

Then, compare the paths and recommend the strongest overall option with justification.</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Outcome:</strong> The model surfaced nuanced trade-offs (e.g., one vendor had superior security, but higher integration cost).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>When to use:</strong> Strategic planning, troubleshooting or scenarios with high uncertainty and multiple viable approaches.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">3. ReAct (Reason+ Act) and prompt chaining: Moving toward agentic behavior</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One of the biggest leaps I have noticed comes from combining reasoning with tool use and chaining prompts.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>ReAct example</strong>: (used in data analytics workflow)</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>You are an AI analyst with access to tools. For the query below:

1. Reason about what information you need.

2. Choose the appropriate tool or action.

3. Observe the result.

4. Repeat until you can answer confidently.

Query: [user request]</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In practice, I chained this with retrieval tools. One automated quarterly compliance reporting; the system reasoned about required data, pulled relevant records, validated them, and generated the reports.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">4. Meta-prompting and self-reflection: Letting the model improve itself</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Use the model to refine its own prompt. This is a huge time-saver.</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>You are an expert prompt engineer. Improve the following prompt for clarity, structure and effectiveness with [target model]. Make it more precise while preserving intent.

Original prompt: [paste]

Provide the improved version and explain your changes.</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Self-reflection loops (asking the model to critique its own output and revise) are a game-changer for content generation and code-review tasks.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">5. Multimodal and structured output techniques</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">With vision-enabled models, I started combining text with images (e.g., uploading architecture diagrams or dashboards).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Tip from experience:</strong> Be extremely specific in describing what the models should focus on.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Best practices I learned the hard way</h4>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Start simple, then layer complexity</strong>: Over-engineered prompts from Day One usually backfire.</li>



<li><strong>Model specific tuning:</strong> Some models respond better to XML delimiters; others to explicit reasoning.</li>



<li><strong>Evaluation and versioning:</strong> Treat prompts like code if you track versions and run automated evals.</li>



<li><strong>Security guardrails:</strong> Always include instructions against prompt injections and respect data boundaries.</li>



<li><strong>When to stop prompting</strong>: For repetitive, high-stakes workflows, move to full agents or an orchestration framework.</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Final takeaways for technical leaders</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Advanced prompt engineering has now become a core competency for anyone responsible for enterprise AI outcomes. Start by picking one technique and apply it rigorously to a real business problem. Document before/ after and you will notice why it’s worth mastering.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The field continues evolving towards more automated and agentic systems, but the ability to precisely direct AI reasoning remains foundational.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How to navigate the AI talent wars]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Cloudflare recently beat Q1 2026 earnings. Revenue up 34% year over year. EPS ahead of consensus. Full-year guidance raised. Then, in the same breath, they announced 1,100 layoffs, 20% of the company. CEO Matthew Prince’s explanation: “The way we work at Cloudflare has fundamentally changed.”



...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694394/it-security-nachrichten/how-to-navigate-the-ai-talent-wars/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694394/it-security-nachrichten/how-to-navigate-the-ai-talent-wars/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:55:50 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/articles/cloudflare-net-q1-earnings-revenues-230528107.html">Cloudflare recently beat Q1 2026 earnings</a>. Revenue up 34% year over year. EPS ahead of consensus. Full-year guidance raised. Then, in the same breath, they announced 1,100 layoffs, 20% of the company. CEO Matthew Prince’s explanation: “The way we work at Cloudflare has fundamentally changed.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/articles/block-q1-earnings-beat-strong-144200216.html">Block did the same thing</a>. Beat guidance, raised outlook, cut 4,000+ jobs. Both framed it as architecting for the AI era.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is not a contradiction. This is the new math boards are running. And if you’re a CIO who hasn’t started running it yourself, <a href="mailto:https://www.cio.com/article/4077996/cios-be-ready-for-agentic-ai-or-be-out-of-a-job.html">you’re behind</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The benchmark has moved</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI-native companies have quietly reset what “efficient” means for a technology organization. Midjourney generates over $500M in revenue with roughly 160 employees, over $3M per head. Anthropic hit a $14B annualized run rate in early 2026 with fewer than 3,000 employees. Across the top AI-native startups, <a href="mailto:https://www.forbes.com/sites/paulbaier/2026/03/31/ai-native-firms-lead-in-revenue-per-employee/">the average revenue per employee is $3.48M</a>, nearly twelve times the traditional SaaS benchmark of $300K.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="mailto:https://www.saastr.com/what-to-do-if-your-business-decelerates/">Boards aren’t comparing you to your 2019 self anymore</a>. They’re comparing you to Anthropic.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is the pressure Cloudflare and Block are responding to. They’re not cutting people because the business is struggling. They’re cutting because investors have internalized a new denominator. Headcount is no longer a proxy for capacity; it’s a liability on the efficiency ratio.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For CIOs, this creates a hiring problem that looks nothing like the cloud or mobile talent gaps of the past decade. Those gaps were about volume: hire 100 cloud engineers, absorb the cost, build the capability… This one is about density; you’re not looking for 100 people. You’re looking for 10 who can deliver what 100 couldn’t, and justify $1M or more in value per seat.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Finding bodies to fill seats has never been easier. Finding people who operate at that level of leverage is a different problem entirely.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">‘Acqui-hires’ are a shortcut with a hidden cost</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Companies have figured out that recruiting AI-native talent one by one is too slow and that it’s faster to buy a team. Google’s acquisition of the Windsurf founders, Meta bringing in the Scale AI team, Accenture’s string of AI-focused acquisitions: <a href="mailto:https://tomtunguz.com/ai-acqui-hire-wave/">these are acqui-hires</a> dressed up as M&amp;A. The premium on experienced AI talent is high enough, and the urgency real enough, that organizations are skipping traditional hiring loops entirely and buying their way in.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I’ve been on the other side of this. My company, MadKudu, was acquired by HG Insights specifically to bring AI-native capability into an established enterprise business. HG needed change agents who had already figured out how to build and ship in this new era, not just people who’d read about it. That’s the thesis behind most of these deals.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But there’s a cost that doesn’t show up in the acquisition price.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI-native teams are fast because they operate with a different set of defaults: full access to tools, minimal governance layers, the ability to experiment and ship without a six-week approval cycle. That operating model is not a perk; it’s the fundamental mechanism. It’s why a team of 10 can do what an enterprise team of 100 can’t.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When you acqui-hire that team and then slot them into your existing approval processes, you’ve bought the people and killed the engine. The change agents you paid for become change-frustrated. The attrition that follows is expensive and predictable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The harder realization: acquiring an AI-native team means accepting how they work. That requires deliberately carving out space for them to operate differently, not just tolerating it but institutionalizing it. The acquisition is an organizational change program, not just a hiring event.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The CIO’s real problem</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The governance stack most enterprise organizations run was designed for a headcount world. Every tool vetting cycle, every vendor review, every security approval was calibrated assuming you were managing a large team where consistency and control were the primary objectives.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That calculus breaks when your goal is talent density. The same approval processes that protect against data leaks are now the reason your best people can’t do their best work. When it takes six weeks to approve a tool that your competitor’s team is already shipping with, you’ve traded velocity for the perception of safety.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The practical fix is structured experimentation: clear guardrails, defined boundaries, but explicit permission to try tools before deciding whether to roll them out broadly. Gating everything prevents you from ever discovering what 10x productivity looks like.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The skills inventory question is also more nuanced than it sounds. Job titles won’t tell you where the leverage is. You need to map the actual tasks within each function and assess which can be automated or augmented with AI. That’s where you find the people who, with the right tools, become your $1M/employee talent, not because you hired differently, but because you enabled better.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is also where the build-versus-buy question gets genuinely tricky. As AI reshapes how products are built and delivered, your internal operating model — how you work, how fast you ship, how you use data — is becoming core IP. Outsourcing delivery means outsourcing the part of the organization where your competitive advantage is now being built.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Closing the gap without slowing down</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="mailto:https://www.saastr.com/the-great-ai-talent-grab-the-latest-20vc-with-jason-harry-and-rory/">The AI talent wars</a> are not primarily a recruiting problem. They’re a rethinking of what organizations are supposed to look like.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Boards have a new benchmark. Cloudflare, Block, Amazon, Meta and others have already started restructuring to meet it, publicly, painfully, even while beating their numbers. The question for CIOs isn’t whether this pressure arrives; it’s whether you’re ahead of it or behind it when it does.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The organizations that navigate this well won’t win by outbidding competitors for a handful of elite engineers. They’ll win by designing operating systems that amplify the leverage of the talent they do have, by enabling their best people rather than constraining them, and by treating AI fluency as a core organizational capability rather than a niche specialization.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Talent density is the new headcount model. The sooner your governance, your tooling and your board conversations reflect that, the better positioned you’ll be when the next efficiency report lands.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Increasing app discovery and engagement on Google TV]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Posted by Paul Lammertsma, Developer Relations Engineer


  With over 300 million monthly active devices across Google TV and Android TV, it’s clear that the living room is a massive, distinct platform for apps to accelerate growth. Today, we’re excited to share Google TV features and developer t...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693513/android-tipps/increasing-app-discovery-and-engagement-on-google-tv/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693513/android-tipps/increasing-app-discovery-and-engagement-on-google-tv/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:15:47 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🤖 Android Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiQn4lINBGbNGjb1HQYUpv_Z0-JdltXyHegoQ-Ukl5l9K2ef4BSjX8c_yu0EWlnHSJnia8oXZYWvMtKxCP9t9PlJmI9GFIy34UDVfMBkEIaz3KJegu0j2TsivMZZPHg9tkIlsyK4NWd0vEq5v1MfQUay8zJ9-2QgLDLBlkqYVxnY7BaYa3QBTVRE3NKxxQ/s2048/GoogleForDevelopers-AndroidText-StrapiMetacard-2048x1323.png">


<div><div class="separator"><i>Posted by Paul Lammertsma, Developer Relations Engineer</i></div></div><div><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjUUiNUfVyqYWETmRLzZjld7Nbk0wpVVqMlxvLssfmOzHDfOKdKI8vZkXau3HMhjkOKcXpeJ-K-JkXiKTLk9tG2XH-O5xPlj-AVfQBnelPGhzkOJwhmFeB3NqVssPj4Cnq9r1ZkAHh-44z-dq71bQOpjIz_8d1VF1m2nYs6azBGxNBrM2GOXm6uGJymbKk/s4209/GoogleForDevelopers-AndroidText-Blogger-4209x1253.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="1253" data-original-width="4209" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjUUiNUfVyqYWETmRLzZjld7Nbk0wpVVqMlxvLssfmOzHDfOKdKI8vZkXau3HMhjkOKcXpeJ-K-JkXiKTLk9tG2XH-O5xPlj-AVfQBnelPGhzkOJwhmFeB3NqVssPj4Cnq9r1ZkAHh-44z-dq71bQOpjIz_8d1VF1m2nYs6azBGxNBrM2GOXm6uGJymbKk/s16000/GoogleForDevelopers-AndroidText-Blogger-4209x1253.png"></a></div><br><i><br></i><p dir="ltr"><br></p>

<p dir="ltr">
  With over 300 million monthly active devices across Google TV and Android TV, it’s clear that the living room is a massive, distinct platform for apps to accelerate growth. Today, we’re excited to share Google TV features and developer tools designed to increase the discoverability of your content and prepare your app for future TV experiences.
</p>

<h2 dir="ltr">Drive discovery and engagement with Gemini</h2>

<p dir="ltr">
  Last year, we brought our AI voice assistant, <a href="https://blog.google/products-and-platforms/platforms/google-tv/gemini-google-tv/">Gemini</a>, to our platform, so that people can easily find what to watch, learn something new on the big screen, and get everyday tasks done with just their voice.
</p>

<p dir="ltr">
  Since launch, we’ve made <a href="https://blog.google/products-and-platforms/platforms/google-tv/new-gemini-features-march-2026/">improvements</a> to how Gemini provides tailored responses to questions. Gemini shares a mix of visuals, videos, and text to help users find what they need, when they need it. For our streaming partners, Gemini is a helpful discovery engine—pulling from your app's metadata to surface your relevant content to viewers.
</p>

<div class="separator"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhN7u9KDZ7L8CIw5cVB_qdWf6PRcm86N8RsrlWPdEYsfwchPZwFBpMaajSqkPwXXAoBP0_v0GpQsWp4_gF_SsBC0DuZlN0qVystQ3fWmHs1qU6dKclljJaea-Phak7qEoGFiu_i3-dj0l7WmA7Tm7T2v8kERsfhKp6BCFs-7y7eSdxVWmFkpIzXYsceaJM/w640-h360/GTV%20Gemini%20-%20GOAT%20overview%20%5B10.8%20MB%5D.gif"></div>

<h2 dir="ltr">Declare support for pointing modality</h2>

<p dir="ltr">
  The TV experience that we once knew is changing. Gemini is changing the way we discover and stream content with voice, but how we use the remote is evolving, too.
</p>

<div class="separator"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi5hNXf8y8wwFxJAgZ0N4QwO5v6QUe7vn4Qy70-ndmo2iTye1qdhKP5WxKPJVwoPi0qdadX25BUJzxtLQZVAHXASOibVD0y3Xd_gFuOzp5GOIBwtXy_2jFa4lsTi4r1k6OzkTe5HyJGkOK-fNspRoo54mEA5IB8K4f0fVZ9UpgTWlringYByYxw3Bn_X1c/w640-h360/GTV%20Pointer%20Remote%20Demo_SHELL.gif"></div>

<p dir="ltr">
  Pointer remotes bring motion-controlled input to the big screen, unlocking faster user navigation across the Google TV Home page and within content-heavy apps. To ensure your app is ready for this shift and provides a great experience for all users, now is the time to start thinking about pointing input. Here’s how to get started:
</p>

<h4><span>1. Adapt your TV app UI Library</span></h4>
<p dir="ltr">
  You’ll need support for hover states, scrollable containers, and cursor clicks to enable pointer remote interactions for your app on Google TV. While implementation varies by UI stack, Jetpack Compose streamlines this transition, as most core components handle these multi-modal interactions natively out of the box.
</p>

<ol type="a">
  <li><strong>Hover state:</strong> Every focusable element on your screen (buttons, movie posters, setting toggles) needs a clear visual feedback mechanism for a hover state. This is often subtler than a focus state but critical for feedback.</li>
  <li><strong>Scrollable containers:</strong> Pointer remotes will also have a small circular touchpad for scrolling. Users can use this touchpad to scroll up or down, or left or right in your app. Your app will need to respond to touch events to scroll.</li>
  <li><strong>Cursor clicks:</strong> Many TV apps today expect a simple D-pad OKAY button “click.” With a pointer remote, a user may “click” on an element that’s not the D-pad focus state, but is instead from a hovered state (similar to a mouse click).</li>
</ol>

<h4><span>2. Test pointing interactions with a mouse today</span></h4>
<p dir="ltr">
  To see how your app handles hover, scroll, and clicks, simply connect a bluetooth mouse or wired mouse to your Google TV. Keep in mind that a mouse has more precise control, since users are closer to the screen and typically rest the mouse in a stable position. Pointer remotes can often be less precise, since users are sometimes 10 feet away from the screen, making rough gestures with the remote from their couch. As a TV designer or developer, you can mitigate this lack of input precision by having larger hover targets for elements.
</p>

<h4><span>3. Declare TV app support for pointer remotes on Google Play</span></h4>
<p dir="ltr">
  Finally, tell Google Play that your TV app is designed to work with a pointer. This ensures that users with pointer remotes will be able to easily find, install, and interact with your app.
</p>

<p dir="ltr">
  Within your AndroidManifest.xml, declare the meta-data tag, <span>android.software.leanback.</span><span>supports_touch</span>. This tag informs the platform that your TV app “spatially supports touch,” since pointer remotes simulate touch events from a distance.
</p>

<p dir="ltr"><strong><em>AndroidManifest.xml</em></strong></p>

<pre>&lt;manifest ...&gt;
    &lt;!-- Signal whether the app is adaptive or built just for TV --&gt;
    &lt;uses-feature android:name="android.software.leanback" android:required="true|false" /&gt;

    &lt;!-- Ensure the app can be installed on conventional TVs --&gt;
    &lt;uses-feature android:name="android.hardware.touchscreen" android:required="false" /&gt;

    &lt;!-- Signal whether the app supports pointer remotes --&gt;
    &lt;meta-data android:name="android.software.leanback.supports_touch" android:value="true|false"/&gt;

    &lt;application ...&gt;
        ...
    &lt;/application&gt;
&lt;/manifest&gt;
</pre>

<p dir="ltr"><strong>Tips:</strong></p><ul>
  <li>The <span>android.<strong>software</strong>.<strong>leanback</strong></span> feature declaration indicates that your app supports D-pad navigation and is intended for distribution only on TV devices via Google Play.</li>
  <li>The new software attribute of <span>android.software.leanback.</span><span>supports_touch</span> declares that in addition to D-pad, you have ensured that your TV app works well for pointer/cursor experiences via mouse (of today) and pointer remotes (of future).</li>
  <li>If you haven't already, now is the time to adopt <a href="https://developer.android.com/compose">Jetpack Compose</a>. Hover, scroll, and clicks are common input modalities that are supported on various form factors, and building your app with an adaptive UI framework enables code reusability and reduced maintenance.</li>
</ul>

<h2 dir="ltr">Onboard the Engage SDK</h2>
<p dir="ltr">
  The Engage SDK, formerly known as the Video Discovery API, optimizes Resumption, Entitlements, and Recommendations across all Google TV form factors to boost app discovery and engagement.
</p>

<ul>
  <li><strong>Resumption:</strong> Partners can easily display a user's paused video within the 'Continue Watching' row from the Home page.</li>
  <li><strong>Entitlements:</strong> The Engage SDK streamlines entitlement management, which matches app content to user eligibility. Users appreciate this because they can enjoy personalized recommendations without needing to manually update all their subscription details. This allows partners to connect with users across multiple discovery points on Google TV.</li>
  <li><strong>Recommendations:</strong> The Engage SDK even highlights personalized recommendations based on content that users watched inside apps.</li>
</ul>

<p dir="ltr">
  It’s a great time to start onboarding the Engage SDK now, since the legacy Watch Next API, which has been powering your continue watching 1.0 experience, will lose support in the 2nd half of 2027. To get started, head to <a href="https://goo.gle/engage-tv">goo.gle/engage-tv</a> to learn more.
</p>

<p dir="ltr">
  We're excited to see how our latest Gemini experience and developer tools will optimize your discovery and drive user engagement on our platform.
</p>Explore this announcement and all Google I/O 2026 updates on <a href="https://io.google/2026/?utm_source=blogpost&amp;utm_medium=pr&amp;utm_campaign=devblogs&amp;utm_content=">io.google</a>.</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Build intelligent Android apps: Integrate into Android's intelligence system using AppFunctions]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Posted by Ben Weiss, Senior Developer Relations Engineer, Android Developer RelationsWelcome back to the blog post series "Build intelligent Android apps" where we take a basic Android app and transform it into a personalized, intelligent, and agentic experience. In our previous post, we explored...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693499/android-tipps/build-intelligent-android-apps-integrate-into-androids-intelligence-system-using-appfunctions/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693499/android-tipps/build-intelligent-android-apps-integrate-into-androids-intelligence-system-using-appfunctions/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:15:27 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🤖 Android Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi961epgT3N_Za_k2-pCJ30tegn7DM-Umh1LWh7Q4NxhryR5H57JB00zKQcek56ccAvEM95i6wyXWWCZZ7486_Gq1ewxPHtsMY13UVsVTmndAvkOJtHPjUXuZ3XW_yBEFtlOr2ocBFIKr0PCRZhIRs67h6bX6zDKihwcxQs8bGbYTqIp5azuBKcX4PNMMY/s2469/AFD%20-%20%5BABL_104%5D%20JetPacker%20AppFunctions_Meta.png"><p></p><p><i>Posted by Ben Weiss, Senior Developer Relations Engineer, Android Developer Relations</i></p><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi92OFxAOxVMpResmBcBoUfxzgcMmVOMn3mXQabB9O-xkC7pjYxrvXS7YLTEWLIBstwuDLc0ePCC-Tf7AKq62mgAXjSYg9-VUIjKvokK6BhGHqPDSXCTQowbpj40plsP3V3Ju3ck4gzNdJmGQ6C1-twuob2UnPu7oY9B_oSwnYSkaif7lSEMwFnStzWknM/s8583/AFD%20-%20%5BABL_104%5D%20JetPacker%20AppFunctions_Blog.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="2601" data-original-width="8583" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi92OFxAOxVMpResmBcBoUfxzgcMmVOMn3mXQabB9O-xkC7pjYxrvXS7YLTEWLIBstwuDLc0ePCC-Tf7AKq62mgAXjSYg9-VUIjKvokK6BhGHqPDSXCTQowbpj40plsP3V3Ju3ck4gzNdJmGQ6C1-twuob2UnPu7oY9B_oSwnYSkaif7lSEMwFnStzWknM/s1600/AFD%20-%20%5BABL_104%5D%20JetPacker%20AppFunctions_Blog.png"></a></div><br><p><br></p><p>Welcome back to the blog post series "<a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/07/build-intelligent-android-apps-introduction-jetpack.html" target="_blank">Build intelligent Android apps</a>" where we take a basic Android app and transform it into a personalized, intelligent, and agentic experience. In our <a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/07/build-intelligent-android-apps-cloud-hybrid-inference.html">previous post</a>, we explored how to leverage Firebase AI Logic to build cloud-hosted and hybrid AI features.</p>Traditional mobile UIs excel at focused, hands-on tasks, and the Android intelligence system is introducing complementary features to make complex, multi-step actions even easier. By supplementing traditional user interfaces, AppFunctions provide a powerful new entry point: A privileged agent on the device can access app features in the background. This can be particularly helpful when users are driving, walking or otherwise multitasking. 

<p>In this article, we'll show you how we designed and integrated these capabilities into our travel planning app, <a href="https://github.com/android/ai-samples/tree/main/jetpacker">JetPacker</a>, using Android AppFunctions. We'll explore the rationale behind our feature choices, discuss the specialized tooling we used to accelerate development, and dive into the code that makes it all work.</p>

<h2>Designing AI-ready features: making choices that matter for your users</h2>

<p>To select which features to provide to the intelligence system, we looked for tasks where a voice or text command is objectively faster than tapping through screens. In this side-by-side screen recording you can see this contrast perfectly: on the left, a user tapping through multiple screens to log an expense; on the right, the same task completed instantly in the background via a privileged agent.</p>

<div class="vertical-video-grid">
  <div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiIr2ssY2GiOlBmFzcP-91j91VjH9QX_sOP8FcmtirYPyXZmYRzNJmfqI_GT6aXYXye8-ntylv-gTNu1Qlnbx5gHiFn9naHqt7tJOQBA3HpQ5uz8XRdavXh7b3IP3FzJb4SsbC4mClGLUHupDwIeE9Du3PNRQr0SGs2lgHZTdHXnv8TagNBRtoJsbpeE6c/s960/Comp%201.gif"><img border="0" data-original-height="540" data-original-width="960" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiIr2ssY2GiOlBmFzcP-91j91VjH9QX_sOP8FcmtirYPyXZmYRzNJmfqI_GT6aXYXye8-ntylv-gTNu1Qlnbx5gHiFn9naHqt7tJOQBA3HpQ5uz8XRdavXh7b3IP3FzJb4SsbC4mClGLUHupDwIeE9Du3PNRQr0SGs2lgHZTdHXnv8TagNBRtoJsbpeE6c/s1600/Comp%201.gif"></a></div><br><div class="vertical-video-wrapper"><br></div>

<p>Our first choice was expense tracking. Logging a coffee expense during a trip usually takes quite a few taps—unlocking the phone, opening the app, finding the active trip, navigating to the expenses tab, tapping the add button, taking a picture of the receipt, and checking the result. By providing the <code>addExpense</code> and <code>getExpenses</code> features as AppFunctions, the system agent handles the heavy lifting. When the user says, "Add a five-dollar coffee expense to my Paris trip," the agent automatically searches for the correct trip ID in the background and inserts the expense, skipping the manual UI flow entirely.</p>

<p>We also prioritized itinerary management. Finding what activity is next on a busy trip itinerary usually requires scrolling through a dense timeline view. By providing <code>getItinerary</code> and <code>addItineraryEvent</code> to the system, the user can simply ask, "What am I doing next in Paris?" and get an immediate answer.</p><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiRduisOXPFs0o2m-JwtESU1fUEanqH-A0eGt58MUuXs-vgN1af77M-j3ETdegzulBq-3TClrDvhO2K_8q4ep8xAlnW1y5T09ZxxHyZmTRtftA9DOmIk7ykfM_JihQ2c2fcUbEA-jCO1sgW2JnxN9qtB8IS58lbQoaIk4cPJPuPQavZNUoW2rNKo9r8g9M/s960/Comp%202.gif"><img border="0" data-original-height="540" data-original-width="960" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiRduisOXPFs0o2m-JwtESU1fUEanqH-A0eGt58MUuXs-vgN1af77M-j3ETdegzulBq-3TClrDvhO2K_8q4ep8xAlnW1y5T09ZxxHyZmTRtftA9DOmIk7ykfM_JihQ2c2fcUbEA-jCO1sgW2JnxN9qtB8IS58lbQoaIk4cPJPuPQavZNUoW2rNKo9r8g9M/s1600/Comp%202.gif"></a></div><br><p><br></p>
  

<p>Finally, we focused on hands-free note capturing. Typing out reminders or notes while walking down a busy street is difficult and unsafe. Exposing a voice note capability allows the user to say, "The flight was amazing, I saw a beautiful sunset and managed to sleep well," and the privileged agent automatically transcribes and saves it directly into the travel database <span face="Roboto, sans-serif"> using the </span><span>addVoiceNote</span><span face="Roboto, sans-serif"> AppFunction.</span></p>

<h2>Android MCP powered by AppFunctions</h2>This entire experience is built on Android MCP. Under this design, the app acts as a local MCP server. Rather than remote APIs, you provide your app features directly to the on-device intelligence system.<br><br><a href="https://d.android.com/ai/appfunctions">Android AppFunctions</a> is the API that brings this concept to life. It reads annotated Kotlin functions and compiles them into type-safe, sandboxed tool definitions that the privileged agent can discover and invoke locally on the device.<div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjypEvh8lAK1myAWpnG4A0TtdIaTxP69t7g9croAJSUZ2Od6AEkhwMusN3CvdGohdvYzoh1UaCxCHb22oJzCD_4B2K8vfQzcyAIaTl8lk3TCR9T0SoMHjjaDk4GMxxPazeCfT0aF7rifm7-LAvcMhyphenhyphenryDJpOPYon7jiISKB2sMLzAwHDuKFxIv16sDXjrM/s2500/Android%20MCP%20diagram.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="1406" data-original-width="2500" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjypEvh8lAK1myAWpnG4A0TtdIaTxP69t7g9croAJSUZ2Od6AEkhwMusN3CvdGohdvYzoh1UaCxCHb22oJzCD_4B2K8vfQzcyAIaTl8lk3TCR9T0SoMHjjaDk4GMxxPazeCfT0aF7rifm7-LAvcMhyphenhyphenryDJpOPYon7jiISKB2sMLzAwHDuKFxIv16sDXjrM/s1600/Android%20MCP%20diagram.png"></a></div><br><p><br></p>

<p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><i><div><i>Diagram highlighting our apps, the android platform, and system agents coordinate AppFunctions.</i></div></i><p>Under the Android MCP model, your app acts as a local MCP server that exposes structured tools, while the Android platform serves as the central tool registry. On the MCP client side, agent apps are registered with the intelligence system after being granted system-privileged permissions to access the registry.</p>

<p>When a user interacts with a registered agent, its LLM determines if the request can be handled by an AppFunction, queries the platform's metadata, and executes the appropriate registered functions in the background. This local MCP client-server design gives you full control: you choose exactly which features are accessible to the agent, keeping the rest of your app's data private.</p>

<h2>How we accelerated development with Android skills</h2>

To streamline the integration process, we leveraged the <a href="https://github.com/android/skills/tree/main/device-ai/appfunctions">AppFunctions development skill</a>. The AppFunctions development skill is a complete development companion. It guided us through the entire lifecycle: mapping Kotlin data classes to serialize parameters, generating the necessary <code>Service</code> entry points, refining our <code>KDoc</code> documentation to ensure the LLM understands parameter boundaries, and setting up automated testing using ADB.

<h2>Providing app features to the intelligence system</h2>

<p>Enough with the theory, let's dive into the implementation.</p>

<h4>Configuration and dependency setup</h4>

<p>We begin by adding the AppFunctions dependencies. One for the API and one for the Kotlin Symbol Processing compiler.</p>

<pre><code>implementation("androidx.appfunctions:appfunctions:1.0.0-alpha10")
ksp("androidx.appfunctions:appfunctions-compiler:1.0.0-alpha10")</code></pre>

<h4>Modeling custom data types</h4>

<p>Any custom object exchanged with the agent must be annotated with <code>@AppFunctionSerializable</code>. In our <a href="https://github.com/android/ai-samples/tree/main/jetpacker/android/feature/appfunctions/src/main/java/com/example/jetpacker/feature/appfunctions/TripSerializable.kt">TripSerializable.kt</a> file, we define our trip data model:</p>

<pre><code>@AppFunctionSerializable(isDescribedByKDoc = true)
data class TripSerializable(
    /** The trip's unique identifier. */
    val id: String,
    /** The trip's title. */
    val title: String,
    /** The trip's destination location. */
    val location: String,
    /** The trip's start date in milliseconds. */
    val startDate: Long,
    /** The trip's end date in milliseconds. */
    val endDate: Long,
    /** A list of participants. */
    val participants: List&lt;String&gt;,
)</code></pre>

<h4>Providing features using the @AppFunction annotation</h4>

<p>Next, the skill wrote the Kotlin functions that perform the database queries and annotate them with <code>@AppFunction</code>. We can view this in searchTrip:</p>

<pre><code>/**
 * Looks for trips based on optional filters like id, title (name), location, and dates.
 *
 * @param id The unique identifier of the trip.
 * @param title The title or name of the trip.
 * @param location The destination location.
 * @param startDate The minimum start date in milliseconds.
 * @param endDate The maximum end date in milliseconds.
 * @return A list of trips matching the filters.
 */
@AppFunction(isDescribedByKDoc = true)
suspend fun searchTrip(
    id: String? = null,
    title: String? = null,
    location: String? = null,
    startDate: Long? = null,
    endDate: Long? = null
): List&lt;TripSerializable&gt; {
    return withContext(Dispatchers.IO) {
    // implementation
}</code></pre>

<p>Since AppFunctions run on the UI thread by default, we use <code>withContext(Dispatchers.IO)</code> to switch to a background dispatcher. Additionally, we refine our KDoc to use clear, imperative verbs and specify parameter constraints. This documentation compiles directly into the tool's schema, which the privileged agent uses to resolve parameters and handle runtime errors.</p>

<h4>The service entry point and Hilt integration</h4>

<p>To register these features with the intelligence system, we create an abstract base class that extends <code>AppFunctionService</code>. We annotate it with <code>@AppFunctionServiceEntryPoint</code>:</p>

<pre><code>@RequiresApi(36)
@AndroidEntryPoint
@AppFunctionServiceEntryPoint(
    serviceName = "JetPackerAppFunctionService",
    appFunctionXmlFileName = "jetpacker_app_function_service"
)
abstract class BaseJetPackerAppFunctionService : AppFunctionService() {
    @Inject internal lateinit var tripDao: TripDao
    // DAOs and database references are injected here...
}</code></pre>

<p>During compilation, KSP generates the final concrete service subclass, <code>JetPackerAppFunctionService</code>, as declared with the <code>serviceName</code> parameter. We also register <code>app_metadata.xml</code> in the app's manifest. This file provides global operational rules for JetPacker's declared AppFunctions.</p>

<h2>Testing and verifying your AppFunctions</h2>

<p>Once implemented, you should verify that your AppFunctions are registered and working correctly.</p>

<p>Running devices or emulators with Android 17 or newer, you can use ADB commands from your terminal to list and invoke your functions. Running <code>adb shell cmd app_function list-app-functions</code> displays all registered functions for your package. You can then execute a specific function and test its database integration by running <code>adb shell cmd app_function execute-app-function</code> while passing a raw JSON parameters string.</p>

<p>Instead of these ADB commands, you can also use the <a href="https://github.com/android/appfunctions">AppFunctions Testing Agent</a> to inspect your configuration, list and execute AppFunctions, and even see how your AppFunctions behave in a real conversational flow.</p>

<h2>Wrapping it up</h2>

<p>When thinking about app features that can be contributed to the intelligence system using AppFunctions requires a slight shift in how we think about code and documentation. AppFunctions enable you to use this new interaction model for apps, which allows using an agent to access app features..</p>

<p>First, the <a href="https://github.com/android/skills/tree/main/device-ai/appfunctions">AppFunctions development skill</a> is an essential lifecycle tool, helping you discover features, implement and refine AppFunctions for your apps. Second, KDoc comments are a compiled API asset; clear parameter descriptions directly impact the execution accuracy of the system agent. Finally, Android MCP provides local-first execution allowing apps to safely collaborate with AI agents.</p>

<p>Contributing app features through AppFunctions makes your application ready for the intelligence system. Let us know how you are adapting your apps for the agentic era!</p>

<h2>Learn more</h2>

<p>Check out the other parts of this blog post series:<br><b><a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/07/build-intelligent-android-apps-introduction-jetpack.html">Part 1:</a></b> Introduction of the app and a high-level overview.<br><a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/07/android-on-device-inference.html"><b>Part 2:</b></a> On-device intelligence. Deep-dive into ML Kit’s GenAI APIs and Gemini Nano to build privacy-first features like itinerary summarization, receipt parsing, and local audio processing.<br><b><a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/07/build-intelligent-android-apps-cloud-hybrid-inference.html">Part 3:</a></b> Hybrid and cloud reasoning. Explore how to use Firebase AI Logic to ground LLM answers in real-world data like Google Maps and web context.<br><a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/07/build-intelligent-android-apps-appfunctions.html"><b>Part 4 (this post!):</b></a> System integration. Integrating with the Android intelligence system using AppFunctions. <br>Part 5 (coming soon): In-app agentic workflows. Extend the app with an end-to-end booking assistant powered by A2UI and ADK.</p>

<p>Interested in more on Android Development? Follow Android Developers on <a href="https://www.youtube.com/@AndroidDevelopers">YouTube</a> or <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/androiddev/">LinkedIn</a>!</p>

<p>
  All code snippets in this blog post follow the following copyright notice:
</p>
<pre><code>Copyright 2026 Google LLC.
SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0</code></pre></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Optimize your apps for the next generation of Samsung Galaxy devices]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Posted by Fahd Imtiaz, Senior Product Manager and Miguel Montemayor, Developer Relations Engineer, Android Developer ExperienceToday at Galaxy Unpacked, Samsung unveiled its latest lineup of foldable and wearable devices. For developers, this means that the variety of form factors, screen sizes, ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693491/android-tipps/optimize-your-apps-for-the-next-generation-of-samsung-galaxy-devices/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693491/android-tipps/optimize-your-apps-for-the-next-generation-of-samsung-galaxy-devices/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:15:16 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🤖 Android Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiV-c747avSj9Z8JO4DTK4kSfO3SjSpd5aTuVvR_TBeD3bXV6cc8lzNLGrWCngNXdyZBeiNjQqwQZCcU4QCrovwL99gu0t5bQrlTXa0PIBGIivwyS8y226MgeraphZr4VITWYe0x7ckFto0dsD8rBLM1J_P3dV0CBj5Ctlwm8jsgAPZA7W2XnKnRz59H9I/s2049/MM_Adaptive_and_device_Meta%20(1).png"><div>



<div><div class="separator"><i>Posted by Fahd Imtiaz, Senior Product Manager and Miguel Montemayor, Developer Relations Engineer, Android Developer Experience</i></div></div><div><i><br></i></div><div><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgGrEplk_My1fOfyw851kt92Jc2wyODN6bwWJaL5EGFV6_5grP3-pS7jrMzI4MOXgo1W1yVHcwj8J7AIO3olxlHDoNWxzTTlQLc9_D6CWB6bUtWLyvxmXN-JQQ92_HWYErsdMVuNkynTjXpZSKoaUTFiY_4aiffEDsfdCrl9om05MRVqqMac0YGExE4XLQ/s4210/MM_Adaptive_and_device_Blog.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="1254" data-original-width="4210" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgGrEplk_My1fOfyw851kt92Jc2wyODN6bwWJaL5EGFV6_5grP3-pS7jrMzI4MOXgo1W1yVHcwj8J7AIO3olxlHDoNWxzTTlQLc9_D6CWB6bUtWLyvxmXN-JQQ92_HWYErsdMVuNkynTjXpZSKoaUTFiY_4aiffEDsfdCrl9om05MRVqqMac0YGExE4XLQ/s1600/MM_Adaptive_and_device_Blog.png"></a></div><br><i><br></i><p>Today at Galaxy Unpacked, Samsung <a href="https://blog.google/products-and-platforms/platforms/android/galaxy-unpacked-2026" target="_blank">unveiled</a> its latest lineup of foldable and wearable devices. For developers, this means that the variety of form factors, screen sizes, and device postures your app needs to support is expanding once again.</p>

<p>With devices like the Galaxy Z Fold8, the ecosystem is expanding to include hardware with a landscape-first natural orientation and a wider aspect ratio in its main display state. Whether a user is unfolding a large display, flipping open a cover screen, or glancing at their wrist, users expect a flawless experience. To help you meet this moment, we’re sharing actionable guidance and new tooling updates to enable you to build adaptively proactively.</p>

<div class="separator">
  </div>

<h2>Rethink layout architecture for dynamic displays, including ultra-wide foldables</h2>

<p>Building for the latest foldables means dropping assumptions about display orientation and size. This is especially true for the Galaxy Z Fold8, which adopts an ultra-wide display, adding to the variety of aspect ratios to account for.  Devices with this landscape-first natural orientation show the limitations of hardcoded layout rules when users unfold the device. That’s why we’ve introduced <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/adaptive-apps/guides/foldables/trifolds-and-landscape-foldables" target="_blank">dedicated guidance for building for landscape foldables and trifolds.</a></p><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjrdDMq9mmhR2NzEVD5cgQgT3Y5DgMZOV5FrjsJb-wSiZVvJjIiDQuUkfv0cjBHQMREjOKPqz9n6wPf-x5Hn6H7uT2_JiXA3Nykcr1UwnwDRK9jGFurhTRKR-5t1BN62ISXFznXhQ_e-03Mo6uIh5-BDVmNbA1Q4RY9rSg4VxBO0K6E6Dc4kViNpvuYefY/s1302/Samsung%20fold8%20phones.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="442" data-original-width="1302" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjrdDMq9mmhR2NzEVD5cgQgT3Y5DgMZOV5FrjsJb-wSiZVvJjIiDQuUkfv0cjBHQMREjOKPqz9n6wPf-x5Hn6H7uT2_JiXA3Nykcr1UwnwDRK9jGFurhTRKR-5t1BN62ISXFznXhQ_e-03Mo6uIh5-BDVmNbA1Q4RY9rSg4VxBO0K6E6Dc4kViNpvuYefY/s1600/Samsung%20fold8%20phones.png"></a></div><br><p>To build a responsive UI that handles these physics seamlessly, focus on the following core pillars:</p>

<p></p><ul><li><b>Build fluid, adaptive layouts: </b>Wide aspect ratios and compact vertical heights require fluid UIs that scale responsively. Our updated <a href="https://developer.android.com/design/ui/mobile/guides/layout-and-content/adapt-layout" target="_blank">adaptive design guidance</a> advises considering the window class width first to determine layout changes, then adjusting for height. To let individual components fluidly adapt to the grid, structure your layout using flexible containers that allow your content to automatically wrap, span, and reflow. For design inspiration browse our <a href="https://developer.android.com/design/ui/gallery/social/pawparazzi" target="_blank">adaptive sample app</a> and <a href="https://developer.android.com/design/ui/gallery/social/dual-screen?hl=en" target="_blank">dual-screen</a> design galleries.</li><li><b>Track actual app space:</b> Your app's display space rarely matches the physical device size, especially on an ultra-wide screen during multi-window, split-screen, or multitasking states. Sometimes even the orientations differ. Leverage <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/adaptive-apps/guides/use-window-size-classes?hl=en" target="_blank">Window Size Classes</a> using the <a href="https://developer.android.com/blog/posts/jetpack-window-manager-1-5-is-stable" target="_blank">Jetpack Window Manager library</a> to calculate the exact space your app occupies.</li></ul><div><br></div>
  
<div class="separator">
  </div></div><div class="separator"><br></div><div class="separator"><div class="separator"><ul><li><b>Leverage the latest Jetpack Compose Update: </b>Start by adopting the stable <a href="https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/04/jetpack-compose-april-2026-updates.html" target="_blank">Jetpack Compose April '26 release</a> (<a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/ui/compose/bom" target="_blank">Compose BOM</a> version <code>2026.04.01</code>).Take advantage of the new structural layout tools to manage complex architectures. The new <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/ui/compose/layouts/adaptive/grid" target="_blank">Grid</a> API allows you to define dynamic tracks and column spans without the performance overhead of a lazy list. Pair Grid with the new <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/ui/compose/layouts/adaptive/flexbox" target="_blank">FlexBox</a> layout API to easily handle multi-axis alignment and dynamic item wrapping. You can also use the new <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/ui/compose/layouts/adaptive/mediaquery" target="_blank">MediaQuery</a> API to adapt your UI to its environment, using conditions to detect signals like device posture, window size, and keyboard types. </li><li><b>Make your app fold aware: </b>Use the Jetpack WindowManager library, which provides an API surface for foldable device window features such as folds and hinges. When your app is<a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/adaptive-apps/guides/foldables/make-your-app-fold-aware" target="_blank"> fold aware</a>, it can adapt its layout to avoid placing important content in the area of folds or hinges and use folds and hinges as natural separators.</li><li><b>Maintain app continuity:</b> Avoid breaking the user journey when the device configuration shifts. Retain your UI state using <a href="https://developer.android.com/topic/libraries/architecture/viewmodel?hl=en" target="_blank">ViewModel</a> to ensure smooth transitions when a user folds or unfolds their device.</li></ul><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjdxp09YbiUc9EzTGhIJ2fcoV67rLKb6Sm9UOVCISO4Xa0VVVnFUJG9PXSAYCq7gnHILLx8xoIx-L2C0blhugbADUa3nM0AOx8UQzGImu194B94Kt-CKAuK1CrGHUz10fBFs02Lmly-HO-fmBHFuZ9knuYRb6EP9v4-SpR7Ja-oeJZErJDUVEgEje0d7J8/s1920/7.22_MorphToTablet_Gif.gif"><img border="0" data-original-height="1080" data-original-width="1920" height="360" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjdxp09YbiUc9EzTGhIJ2fcoV67rLKb6Sm9UOVCISO4Xa0VVVnFUJG9PXSAYCq7gnHILLx8xoIx-L2C0blhugbADUa3nM0AOx8UQzGImu194B94Kt-CKAuK1CrGHUz10fBFs02Lmly-HO-fmBHFuZ9knuYRb6EP9v4-SpR7Ja-oeJZErJDUVEgEje0d7J8/w640-h360/7.22_MorphToTablet_Gif.gif" width="640"></a></div><div><h2>Ensure seamless camera capture on foldable devices</h2><div>Camera implementation on foldables brings unique hardware quirks. Moving from a compact outer display to an expanded inner display introduces distinct layout aspect ratios while device rotation remains unchanged. If an app assumes a fixed portrait relationship between the camera sensor and the device layout, the app will likely suffer from sideways, stretched, or cropped previews during these folding transitions.</div><div> </div><div>When optimizing your app's media pipeline, migrate your capture experiences to <a href="https://developer.android.com/media/camera/camerax" target="_blank">CameraX</a> using the CameraX migration <a href="https://github.com/android/skills/blob/main/camera/camerax/SKILL.md">skill</a>. The library’s <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/kotlin/androidx/camera/view/PreviewView" target="_blank">PreviewView</a> automatically handles sensor orientation, device rotation, and scaling behind the scenes. This guarantees a clean, stable preview regardless of how the user holds or positions the device. If you are maintaining an existing Camera2 codebase, integrate the <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/adaptive-apps/guides/foldables/trifolds-and-landscape-foldables#solution_2_cameraviewfinder" target="_blank">CameraViewfinder</a> library to apply these complex aspect ratio and rotation transformations automatically without needing a total architecture overhaul.</div></div><h2>Extend glanceable interactions to Wear OS 7</h2><div>The opportunity to build for this new generation of devices extends right to the wrist. Launching with Wear OS 7, Wear Widgets give you a fresh surface to provide users with instant, glanceable access to their essential updates. You can build these highly expressive experiences using <a href="https://developer.android.com/jetpack/androidx/releases/glance-wear" target="_blank">Jetpack Glance</a> and <a href="https://developer.android.com/jetpack/androidx/releases/compose-remote" target="_blank">RemoteCompose</a>. Crucially, Widgets built with this framework can now populate multi-widget tiles that were previously reserved for first-party widgets. </div><div><br></div>
    
 <div class="separator">
  </div><div class="separator"><h2>Build intelligent features </h2><div class="separator"><a href="https://blog.google/products-and-platforms/platforms/android/gemini-intelligence/" target="_blank">Gemini intelligence </a>already completes tasks on users’ behalf, and you can <a href="https://developer.android.com/ai/appfunctions?_gl=1*1jms098*_up*MQ..*_ga*MjY0OTY0MDI3LjE3ODQzMzI1NDk.*_ga_6HH9YJMN9M*czE3ODQzMzI1NDkkbzEkZzAkdDE3ODQzMzI1NDkkajYwJGwwJGgxNjE0MTMzNjEz" target="_blank">experiment</a> with the intelligence system by sharing your apps capabilities. </div><div class="separator"><br></div><div class="separator">Samsung’s new foldable devices come with Gemini Nano 4, our latest on-device model. Nano 4 provides support for over 140 languages, better multimodal understanding, and <a href="https://developers.google.com/ml-kit/release-notes#july_14_2026" target="_blank">much more</a>. Use <a href="https://developers.google.com/ml-kit/genai/prompt/android" target="_blank">ML Kit’s Prompt API</a> with advanced features like s<a href="https://developers.google.com/ml-kit/genai/prompt/android/structured-output" target="_blank">tructured output</a> and <a href="https://developers.google.com/ml-kit/genai/prompt/android/thinking-mode" target="_blank">thinking mode</a> to build intelligent features on-device. </div><div class="separator"><h2>Start optimizing today</h2><div class="separator">The tools and frameworks are ready to help you optimize your app for all screen sizes. Begin by exploring our guidance for <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/adaptive-apps" target="_blank">building adaptive apps </a>to learn more about core adaptive design principles. </div><div class="separator"><br></div><div class="separator">To dive deeper, check out our comprehensive <a href="https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLD2U7gd1-ieo" target="_blank">YouTube playlist</a>. Finally, ensure your app delivers a flawless, premium experience on the newest form factors by reviewing our dedicated quality guidelines for <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/adaptive-apps/guides/foldables/trifolds-and-landscape-foldables" target="_blank">trifolds and landscape foldables</a> and <a href="https://developer.android.com/design/ui/wear/guides/get-started?hl=en" target="_blank">WearOS</a>. </div><div class="separator"><br></div><div class="separator">Unfold the future today! </div></div></div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[State of the Thunder 14: The 2026 Mobile Roadmap]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: Mozilla Thunderbird - Bewertung: 28x - Views:1101 As 2025 winds down, its time to start thinking of what we want to achieve for our Android AND iOS apps next year. Alessandro walks us through the 2026 mobile roadmap, covering our urgent priorities, feature wish list, and a glimpse at our ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693440/video/state-of-the-thunder-14-the-2026-mobile-roadmap/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693440/video/state-of-the-thunder-14-the-2026-mobile-roadmap/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:05:15 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: Mozilla Thunderbird - Bewertung: 28x - Views:1101 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/TB7XcRLVxFI?autoplay=1&origin=https://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p>As 2025 winds down, its time to start thinking of what we want to achieve for our Android AND iOS apps next year. Alessandro walks us through the 2026 mobile roadmap, covering our urgent priorities, feature wish list, and a glimpse at our upcoming design plans for the entire Thunderbird project.<br />
<br />
Chapters<br />
<br />
00:00 Intro<br />
01:47 Thunderbird Pro in Mobile<br />
05:49 How we build a roadmap<br />
07:40 Android initiatives<br />
12:51 Material 3 or Material You<br />
21:05 Calendar Exploration Questions<br />
31:26 Roadmap items for our community<br />
33:34 iOS initiatives<br />
<br />
Resources:<br />
Current Android Roadmap: https://github.com/orgs/thunderbird/projects/19<br />
TB Pro Announcement: https://blog.thunderbird.net/2025/04/thundermail-and-thunderbird-pro-services/<br />
Mobile Development Matrix: https://matrix.to/#/#tb-mobile-dev:mozilla.org<br />
Thunderbird for Android GitHub Issues: https://github.com/thunderbird/thunderbird-android/issues<br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Firefox Nightly: Backup for a Rainy Day – These Weeks in Firefox: Issue 202]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Highlights

The profile backup mechanism has been enabled by default for all desktop platforms in Nightly, as well as Beta! The current plan is to have this ride out to Firefox 151 for Windows, macOS and Linux on May 18th!

This feature, when enabled, will create a copy of your profile data in th...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693295/tools/firefox-nightly-backup-for-a-rainy-day-these-weeks-in-firefox-issue-202/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693295/tools/firefox-nightly-backup-for-a-rainy-day-these-weeks-in-firefox-issue-202/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:37:35 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾  Tools</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Highlights</h3>
<ul>
<li>The profile backup mechanism has been enabled by default for all desktop platforms in Nightly, as well as Beta! The current plan is to have this ride out to Firefox 151 for Windows, macOS and Linux on May 18th!
<ul>
<li>This feature, when enabled, will create a copy of your profile data in the background and store it in a single file on your file system that you can restore from.</li>
<li>You will be able to manage this feature in Settings under Sync (for now)
<ul>
<li><a href="https://blog.nightly.mozilla.org/files/2026/06/image6.png"><img alt="Firefox settings page showing the Backup feature in dark mode. Backup is enabled, with details of the most recent backup and a “Backup now” button. The page displays the backup file name and a backup location folder path, along with “Choose…” and “Show in folder” buttons. A “Sensitive data” section includes an option to back up passwords and payment methods with encryption, and a disabled “Change password” button." class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2074" height="517" src="https://blog.nightly.mozilla.org/files/2026/06/image6.png" width="657"></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><a href="https://support.mozilla.org/kb/firefox-backup">You can read more about the feature here</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>As followups to the recent addition to the WebExtension tabs API to <a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Add-ons/WebExtensions/Working_with_the_Tabs_API#working_with_tab_split_views">support the new SplitView tabs feature</a>, tabs.group() and tabs.ungroup() have been fixed to work correctly with split view tabs, and fixed split views being prepended instead of appended to tab groups when adopted into a new window –<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2029099"> Bug 2029099</a> /<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2029534"> Bug 2029534</a></li>
<li>Adaptive autofill has been enabled on Nightly.
<ul>
<li>Previously, autofill only completed domains (e.g. typing red autofilled<a href="http://reddit.com/"> reddit.com</a>). Now it can also complete full URLs for pages you visit often (e.g. red →<a href="http://reddit.com/r/firefox"> reddit.com/r/firefox</a>), learning from what you actually click in the address bar. If a suggestion isn’t helpful, you can now dismiss it so autofill learns what not to show you too.
<ul>
<li>If you run into issues or have feedback, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Firefox&amp;component=Address+Bar">you can file a bug here</a>!</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=293943">Markus Stange [:mstange]</a> implemented dynamic toolbar on top in RDM (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1978145">#1978145</a>), but also implemented some static skeleton UI so it’s closer to what we actually have in Firefox for Android
<ul>
<li>dynamic toolbar is behind a pref: devtools.responsive.dynamicToolbar.enabled</li>
<li>it can be put on top by setting devtools.responsive.dynamicToolbar.onTop, otherwise it’s at the bottom</li>
<li><a href="https://blog.nightly.mozilla.org/files/2026/06/image1.png"><img alt="Firefox Responsive Design Mode on Desktop displaying the Mozilla homepage in a mobile viewport. The toolbar at the top shows a simulated Android device (including the dynamic toolbar) with a viewport size of 376 × 464 pixels and a device pixel ratio of 3. The page content is shown in French, featuring the Mozilla logo, a “Menu” link, a “Pause animation” button, and the headline “Bienvenue chez Mozilla” with accompanying text about trusted technology and digital rights." class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2069" height="1113" src="https://blog.nightly.mozilla.org/files/2026/06/image1.png" width="882"></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Friends of the Firefox team</h3>
<h3><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?title=Resolved%20bugs%20(excluding%20employees)&amp;quicksearch=958957%2C1876109%2C1997388%2C2000797%2C1950995%2C1986020%2C2018272%2C2018276%2C2021681%2C2027969%2C2022115%2C1999012%2C2016058%2C2026585%2C2023913%2C2028167%2C2028293%2C2028927%2C1998002%2C2011343%2C1997925%2C2026574%2C2029398%2C2029684%2C1948019%2C2008756%2C2022601%2C2026032%2C2030428%2C1968244%2C1975391%2C944228%2C1962904%2C1977741%2C1997346%2C2027867%2C2030631%2C1807516%2C2030998%2C2030999%2C2015491%2C2028153%2C2028628%2C1978290%2C2008128%2C2024033%2C1883497%2C1984679%2C2030069%2C2031162%2C2031598%2C2012399%2C2031116%2C2031128%2C2031931%2C2031961%2C2033173%2C2032997%2C1919387%2C1947679%2C2027915%2C2032196%2C2019561%2C2024187%2C1392125%2C1993844%2C2027060%2C1983408%2C2034178%2C1873954%2C1875083%2C2008119%2C2008197%2C1628669%2C2031599%2C2033820">Resolved bugs (excluding employees)</a></h3>
<p><a href="https://github.com/niklasbaumgardner/NewContributorScraper">Script to find new contributors from bug list</a></p>
<h4>Volunteers that fixed more than one bug</h4>
<ul>
<li>Amin Amir</li>
<li>aoia7rz7l</li>
<li>Chukwuka Rosemary</li>
<li>DrSeed</li>
<li>Frédéric Wang Nélar</li>
<li>japandi</li>
<li>John Iweh</li>
<li>jonathancabera</li>
<li>Josh Aas</li>
<li>Keji Bakare</li>
<li>kofoworola shonuyi</li>
<li>konyhéa</li>
<li>liz</li>
<li>Mathew Hodson</li>
<li>Okhuomon Ajayi</li>
<li>Oluwatobi</li>
<li>ROSHAAN</li>
<li>Sam Johnson</li>
</ul>
<h4>New contributors (🌟 = first patch)</h4>
<ul>
<li> Anthony Mclamb:<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027915"> Disable the legacy Edge migrator</a></li>
<li> Amin Amir
<ul>
<li>🌟<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2031599">Fix browsingContext.sys.mjs to assign to #contextCreatedHandled instead of contextCreatedHandled</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2033820">Fix missing WITHOUT ROWID SQLite performance optimization in SERPCategorization.sys.mjs</a></li>
<li>🌟 Amine Zroual:<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1392125"> Omitted maxResults property not handled correctly in getRecentlyClosed</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>any1here:<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2031162"> install_sig_alt_stack incorrectly checks mmap’s return value</a></li>
<li>🌟 Armin Ulrich:<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2031598"> Fix MessageHandlerRegistry.sys.mjs calling getExistingMessageHandler with an unused second argument</a></li>
<li>japandi
<ul>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1628669">Cannot remove amazon.com from top sites list</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1977741">The height of the pinned tabs area should be responsive to the number of pins</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1986020">Use cenum for nsIHelperAppLauncherDialog reason constants to enable better typescript annotations</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Nathan Johnson [:narjoDev]:<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1950995"> Remove browser.display.use_system_colors pref</a></li>
<li>DrSeed
<ul>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1962904">Firefox shows vertical tabs in new windows despite “Hide tabs and sidebar” setting</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1968244">The “Expand sidebar on hover” option is not kept after the vertical tabs are disabled and enabled again</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Keji Bakare:
<ul>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2008756">Split view’s focus-outline is clipped on the right side of left tab</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2031116">White space on the right side of left panel in split view</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>🌟 gotyaoi:<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1807516"> Reload toolbar button is active on about:newtab</a></li>
<li>Itoro James:<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2015491"> [A11y][Keyboard Navigation]Cancelling a note via Keyboard Navigation still saves it</a></li>
<li>John Iweh:<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1997925"> The notification dot is not displayed if the tab is in a Split View</a></li>
<li>🌟 John Iweh:<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027867"> sidebar-shown attribute remains when sidebar.revamp is false</a></li>
<li>🌟 jonathancabera:
<ul>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2012399">The Move tab to Split View option is also displayed for the tabs that are within the Split View</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2016058">A Note with long text (1003 characters) is saved by pressing ENTER even if the “Save” button is disabled</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2026032">Tab group guide line becomes disconnected under certain conditions related to split views in vertical tab mode</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Aloys:<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2000797"> Remove logic that forces distribution language packs to be reinstalled when upgrading from Firefoxes older than 67</a></li>
<li>liz:
<ul>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1875083">Create test to ensure maxRenderCountEstimate is never being set to Infinity in virtual-list component in Fx View</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2008119">Button accessible name does not convey its function: missing topic context (Settings dialog &gt; Topics dialog &gt; buttons Following/Unfollow/Blocked/Unblock)</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Mary cathline:<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2022115"> Tab Group Label does not respect touch density in vertical tab bar</a></li>
<li>🌟 Brandon Lucier:<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2030631"> Popups opened with window.open give window type normal instead of popup</a></li>
<li>karan68:<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1997388"> [dialog] New Shortcut dialog needs a label/accessible name</a></li>
<li>🌟 Vector:<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2008128"> Button does not programmatically indicate that it opens a dialog (Recent activity section &gt; story card &gt; ••• disclosure &gt; Delete from History button)</a></li>
<li>🌟 Osoble:<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1876109"> Update font size and weight for synced tabs device name headers in Firefox View</a></li>
<li>konyhéa:
<ul>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1873954">Add test for sync admin disabled to browser_syncedtabs_errors_firefoxview.js</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1883497">Check all second paramaters for TestUtils.waitForCondition in Fx View test files</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2030069">Recently Closed Tabs, Tabs from Other Devices, and History pages should have Cmd / Ctrl + Click on a link open the link in the new background tab.</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Noble Chinonso: <a href="http://sidebartreeview.js/">#shouldHandleEvent in SidebarTreeView.js compares event.keyCode to string values, causing Home/End keys to never be handled</a></li>
<li>Pranjali Srivastava:<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=944228"> Add a test to verify that the space above tabs is consistent across PB, LWT and sizemode (where appropriate)</a></li>
<li>Okhuomon Ajayi:
<ul>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2018272">More spacing is needed between the tab note icon and the close icon on the tab</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2019561">The tabs in vertical mode collapsed state are positioned differently in Split View</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027060">Keep vertical split view tabs stacked vertically even when the sidebar is expanded when expand on hover is enabled</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2029684">Vertical split view tabs can be too big or small when tabs are overflowing</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>🌟 Rishan:<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2030428"> Fix duplicated arrow function in browser_history_sidebar.js</a></li>
<li>Chukwuka Rosemary:
<ul>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1948019">“Forget About This Site” context menu option missing from Firefox View history</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2026574">Long strings are not displayed properly on the about:opentabs page search filed</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2028153">Add test for Forget This Site option in Fxview history context menu.</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>ROSHAAN:
<ul>
<li>🌟<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2018276">Tab note background colour is incorrect for default light theme</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1997346"> [win/linux] The splitter between content areas does not match Figma spec</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2028927">Fix typo in OpenInTabsUtils.confirmOpenInTabs()</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Sameeksha:<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2008197"> Disclosure button expanded/collapsed state not programmatically defined (Customize button)</a></li>
<li>kofoworola shonuyi:
<ul>
<li>🌟<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1999012">Actually hide or remove sidebar-shown attribute when in fullscreen.</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2028293">Add a test for checking sidebar-shown attribute in fullscreen mode</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>🌟 Sayd Mateen:<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2021681"> Page URL is displayed as tab name when page’s contains about:reader?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Oluwatobi:
<ul>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1975391">Unable to delete selected history entries from sidebar</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1993844">Incorrect Sidebar button state/tooltip hover text</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2023913">The city name heading level doesn’t follow the correct heading level order</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Nishchay [:nish]:<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2031961"> Unable to add tabs to old closed tab groups (tabGroupState.splitViews is undefined)</a></li>
</ul>
<p> </p>
<h3>Project Updates</h3>
<h4>Add-ons / Web Extensions</h4>
<h5>Addon Manager &amp; about:addons</h5>
<ul>
<li>In preparation for the Project Nova restyling of the about:addons page, we have refactored about:addons into separate per-component ES modules, splitting the monolithic aboutaddons.js and aboutaddons.html into 16 dedicated component files under components/ (with no behavior or UI changes) –<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2032014"> Bug 2032014</a>
<ul>
<li>NOTE: if you have working on patches with changes to about:addons internals it is very likely you’ll need to rebase and solve merge conflicts hit on top of this refactoring, the internals are still largely the same as before but don’t hesitate to reach out to the Addons team if you have doubts / questions or need help to figure out how to adapt your patch of top of these changes</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h5>WebExtensions Framework</h5>
<ul>
<li>Fixed exportFunction to preserve the constructibility of the wrapped function instead of unconditionally making all exported functions implicitly as constructors –<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2033173"> Bug 2033173</a>
<ul>
<li>Thanks to Gregory Pappas for contributing this improvement to the Content Scripts’ Xray Wrappers helpers!</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Fixed a Firefox 151 regression where extension content scripts accessing location.ancestorOrigins caused subsequent page script reads of the same property to fail with “Permission denied”, breaking sites like Gmail –<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2034329"> Bug 2034329</a>
<ul>
<li>Thanks to Simon Farre for promptly investigating and fixing this recent regression!</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h5>WebExtension APIs</h5>
<ul>
<li>Updated sessions.getRecentlyClosed() to remove the hardcoded cap when maxResults is omitted –<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1392125"> Bug 1392125</a>
<ul>
<li>Shoutout to Amine Zroual for contributing this enhancement to the sessions WebExtensions API!</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h4>DevTools</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=750915">Artem Manushenkov</a> fixed an issue where autosuggestion popup was removing overridden indicators from properties in the Inspector (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1983408">#1983408</a>)</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=446257">Andrea Marchesini [:baku]</a> fix DevTools cookie header serialization for long cookies, which could lead to cookies not being visible in Netmonitor (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2031299">#2031299</a>)</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=559949">Julian Descottes [:jdescottes]</a> fixed a toolbox crash that was happening we couldn’t find a localization file (e.g. when using a language pack on Nightly) (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2028930">#2028930</a>)</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=557153">Nicolas Chevobbe [:nchevobbe]</a> improved @container tooltip so it show the value of variables used in style()(<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2030239">#2030239</a>), has enough contrast in dark mode (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2033782">#2033782</a>) and contains a link to select the container (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2031688">#2031688</a>)
<ul>
<li><a href="https://blog.nightly.mozilla.org/files/2026/06/image3.png"><img alt='Firefox Developer Tools showing a CSS @container style() rule in the Rules panel. A popover for a element displays container properties including "container-name: hello section-container", "container-type: inline-size", and the custom property "--w: 100px", while indicating that --secondary and --plouf are not set. Below, the container query uses nested var() fallbacks, and a CSS declaration previews the resolved value for background-color.' class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2071" height="532" src="https://blog.nightly.mozilla.org/files/2026/06/image3.png" width="1038"></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=656417">Hubert Boma Manilla (:bomsy)</a> is making good progress on migrating the Console to CodeMirror 6 (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2032758">#2032758</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2026569">#2026569</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h4>Fluent</h4>
<ul>
<li>We’re now at over 72% of our strings being Fluent! Got a component still using .properties? Convert when you can!</li>
<li><a href="https://blog.nightly.mozilla.org/files/2026/06/image5.png"><img alt="Stacked area chart titled “Are We Fluent Yet?” showing the number and type of localization strings available in Firefox from 2018 to 2026. The chart tracks Fluent strings (green), Properties strings (blue), DTD strings (pink), and a small number of INI strings. Over time, Fluent strings steadily increase while DTD and Properties strings decline. A tooltip at April 26, 2026 shows 10,372 Fluent strings, 3,997 Properties strings, and no remaining DTD or INC strings, illustrating Firefox’s ongoing migration to the Fluent localization system." class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2073" height="924" src="https://blog.nightly.mozilla.org/files/2026/06/image5.png" width="1509"></a></li>
</ul>
<h4>Migration Improvements</h4>
<ul>
<li>Thanks to dao for <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2035009">fixing a recent alignment issue in the migration wizard dropdown</a></li>
<li>Thanks to volunteer contributor Anthony Mclamb for his patch that <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027915">disables the legacy EdgeHTML Edge migrator</a>! Once that finishes rolling out, presuming no surprises, we’ll go ahead and remove the migrator entirely.</li>
</ul>
<h4>New Tab Page</h4>
<ul>
<li>Nova for New Tab has ridden the trains to Beta! It will be enabled by default, globally, when Firefox 151 goes out to release on May 19th
<ul>
<li>It’s possible that we’ll do a train-hop coupled with an experiment to enable HNT Nova for a few clients a bit earlier.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Maxx Crawford<a href="https://bugzil.la/2032213"> enabled Nova designs for New Tab</a>, rolling out the updated layout, widgets, and customization panel behind HNT Nova flags.</li>
<li>Maxx Crawford<a href="https://bugzil.la/2033165"> fixed the Nova content feed to render the intended four‑column layout</a> by correcting CSS grid breakpoints.</li>
<li>Maxx Crawford<a href="https://bugzil.la/2033264"> resolved a first‑load failure in the Weather widget</a> by fixing init order and fetch timing, eliminating the “Oops” error.</li>
<li>Maxx Crawford<a href="https://bugzil.la/2031707"> synchronized the Weather toggle between about:preferences#home and the panel</a> via the shared showWeather pref to prevent desync.</li>
<li>Maxx Crawford<a href="https://bugzil.la/2021460"> updated Nova grid focus order</a> to align tab flow with visual order for keyboard users.</li>
<li>Maxx Crawford<a href="https://bugzil.la/2034620"> fixed critical UI issues in Lists and Timer widgets</a> covering overflow, controls, and layout stability.</li>
<li>Maxx Crawford<a href="https://bugzil.la/2032462"> guarded document.dir access in Nova render paths</a> to avoid startup cache worker errors and improve startup stability.</li>
<li>Rolf<a href="https://bugzil.la/2031568"> added a new normalization method for the inferred interest vector</a> to stabilize topic relevance across sessions.</li>
<li>Rolf<a href="https://bugzil.la/2031569"> prevented unnecessary content refreshes during Pocket New Tab experiments</a>, reducing jank and bandwidth.</li>
<li>Sameeksha<a href="https://bugzil.la/2008197"> defined the Customize button’s expanded/collapsed state programmatically</a> using aria-expanded for better a11y.</li>
<li>liz<a href="https://bugzil.la/2008119"> clarified follow/unfollow/blocked button names with topic context</a> so screen readers announce clear actions.</li>
<li>Vector<a href="https://bugzil.la/2008128"> marked the Delete from History control as opening a dialog</a> via aria-haspopup=dialog for assistive tech.</li>
<li>Scott Downe<a href="https://bugzil.la/2034145"> fixed a regression that flipped the Wallpapers pref off</a>, restoring user selections.</li>
<li>Irene Ni<a href="https://bugzil.la/2033927"> corrected privacy link color and focus styles</a> for contrast and keyboard visibility.</li>
<li>Reem Hamoui<a href="https://bugzil.la/2030873"> added a wallpaper toggle reset in the Nova customization panel</a> so users can quickly restore default wallpapers without extra steps.</li>
<li>Reem Hamoui<a href="https://bugzil.la/2031669"> fixed the Customize pencil button to match the Nova spec</a>, aligning placement and iconography for visual consistency.</li>
<li>Dre<a href="https://bugzil.la/2032607"> updated the ‘Fresh new’ wallpapers copy</a> to a clearer, localized message for better comprehension.</li>
<li>Irene Ni<a href="https://bugzil.la/2033927"> fixed Nova privacy link color and focus styles</a> to meet contrast and focus ring guidelines, improving accessibility on New Tab.</li>
<li>Irene Ni<a href="https://bugzil.la/2034098"> adjusted Sponsored tile character limits</a> to prevent truncation/overflow, yielding cleaner titles across grid and wide tiles.</li>
<li>Scott Downe<a href="https://bugzil.la/2034145"> fixed a regression that flipped the Wallpapers user pref to false</a>, restoring wallpapers for affected users and preventing unintended disablement.</li>
<li>Reem Hamoui<a href="https://bugzil.la/2034688"> hooked the wallpaper check into the new toggle logic</a> so the Customization Panel accurately reflects wallpaper availability and state.</li>
<li>Irene Ni<a href="https://bugzil.la/2034912"> landed Nova UI updates for the Daily Briefing 3-pack card</a>, improving spacing, type scale, and tap targets.</li>
<li>Reem Hamoui<a href="https://bugzil.la/2030873"> added a wallpaper toggle reset in the Nova customization panel</a> so users can quickly restore default wallpapers without extra steps.</li>
<li>Reem Hamoui<a href="https://bugzil.la/2031669"> fixed the Customize pencil button to match the Nova spec</a>, aligning placement and iconography for visual consistency.</li>
<li>Dre<a href="https://bugzil.la/2032607"> updated the ‘Fresh new’ wallpapers copy</a> to a clearer, localized message for better comprehension.</li>
<li>Irene Ni<a href="https://bugzil.la/2033927"> fixed Nova privacy link color and focus styles</a> to meet contrast and focus ring guidelines, improving accessibility on New Tab.</li>
<li>Irene Ni<a href="https://bugzil.la/2034098"> adjusted Sponsored tile character limits</a> to prevent truncation/overflow, yielding cleaner titles across grid and wide tiles.</li>
<li>Scott Downe<a href="https://bugzil.la/2034145"> fixed a regression that flipped the Wallpapers user pref to false</a>, restoring wallpapers for affected users and preventing unintended disablement.</li>
<li>Reem Hamoui<a href="https://bugzil.la/2034688"> hooked the wallpaper check into the new toggle logic</a> so the Customization Panel accurately reflects wallpaper availability and state.</li>
<li>Irene Ni<a href="https://bugzil.la/2034912"> landed Nova UI updates for the Daily Briefing 3-pack card</a>, improving spacing, type scale, and tap targets.</li>
</ul>
<h4>Search and Urlbar</h4>
<ul>
<li>Marco has fixed a<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2034743"> couple</a> of<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1989632"> issues</a> with the places databases to try and improve stability. This should help with avoiding users losing bookmarks or favicons.</li>
<li>Work continues on the new separate search bar to improve the functionality, e.g.<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2033231"> allowing middle click</a> to perform a search in a new tab,<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2032991"> avoiding performing a</a> search when adding a search engine.</li>
<li>Work also continues on the new Nova layouts.</li>
</ul>
<h4>Smart Window</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2032122">uplifted 10 bugs</a> to 150.0.1 dot release addressing initial user feedback from diary study and <a href="https://connect.mozilla.org/">Connect</a>
<ul>
<li>jump to bottom of conversation <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2028692">2028692</a></li>
<li>stop streaming button <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2029204">2029204</a></li>
<li>back/forward navigation from assistant <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2029229">2029229</a></li>
<li>dark mode for various chips <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2024499">2024499</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>search engine switching from smart bar <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2021973">2021973</a></li>
<li>Nova styling within smart window <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2026794">2026794</a></li>
</ul>
<h4>Storybook/Reusable Components/Acorn Design System</h4>
<ul>
<li>Dustin converted moz-breadcrumb-group variables into JSON design tokens <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2029181">Bug 2029181 – Convert moz-breadcrumb-group variables into JSON design tokens</a></li>
<li>Dustin converted moz-box-* variables into JSON design tokens <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2029180">Bug 2029180 – Convert moz-box-* variables into JSON design tokens</a></li>
<li>Dustin converted moz-promo variables to JSON design tokens <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2029190">Bug 2029190 – Convert moz-promo variables into JSON design tokens</a></li>
<li>Dustin converted moz-reorderable-list variables to JSON design tokens <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2029191">Bug 2029191 – Convert moz-reorderable-list variables into JSON design tokens</a></li>
<li>Dustin converted moz-visual-picker variables to JSON design tokens <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2029193">Bug 2029193 – Convert moz-visual-picker-item variables into JSON design tokens</a></li>
<li>Dustin updated browser-shared.css so it passes use-design-tokens <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2022985">Bug 2022985 – Update browser-shared.css so it passes use-design-tokens</a></li>
<li>Dustin updated popup.css so it passes use-design-tokens <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2022979">Bug 2022979 – Update popup.css so it passes use-design-tokens</a></li>
<li>Jon added opacity tokens and added opacity to use-design-tokens stylelint rule  <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1955325">Bug 1955325 – Create opacity tokens</a></li>
<li>Jon converted toolbar design tokens to JSON <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017970">Bug 2017970 – Convert toolbar design tokens to json</a></li>
<li>Anna fixed moz-select with panel-list drop-down size inconsistency <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2032365">Bug 2032365 – Applications Action drop-down menus sometimes have a different size when opened</a></li>
<li>Anna fixed issue with the disabled state of moz-radio component <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027123">Bug 2027123 – moz-radio disabled state cannot be changed while the moz-radio-group is disabled</a></li>
<li>Anna updated moz-button and moz-box-button components to prevent label corruption when accesskeys are present and the label changes.   <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2022326">Bug 2022326 – moz-button with accesskey label becomes corrupted when l10nId updates dynamically</a></li>
</ul>
<h4>UX Fundamentals</h4>
<ul>
<li>The error pages shown when a server sends back an invalid response header or an unsupported content encoding now display accurate, context-specific messages. The invalid response header page also gained a helpful list of next steps. – <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027209">2027209</a></li>
<li>In progress: The error page illustrations are being replaced with new artwork, and the system now supports per-illustration size configuration, giving each image the ability to define its own appropriate dimensions. – <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2031837">2031837</a></li>
</ul>
<h4>Settings Redesign</h4>
<ul>
<li>Tim converted settings related to Accessibility page to config-based pane <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1968116">Bug 1968116 – Convert settings related to Accessibility page to config-based settings</a></li>
<li>Benjamin converted Privacy &amp; Security page to the config-based pane <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1968112">Bug 1968112 – Convert settings related to Privacy &amp; Security page to config-based settings</a></li>
<li>Finn integrated Firefox Labs page into setting-pane config <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2021047">Bug 2021047 – Integrate Firefox Labs page into setting-pane config</a></li>
<li>Anna converted Firefox Updates section to config-based prefs <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1990961">Bug 1990961 – Convert Firefox Updates section to config-based prefs</a></li>
<li>Mark Kennedy added moz-promo, that is welcoming users to the redesigned settings <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2015093">Bug 2015093 – Add a moz-promo to welcome users to the redesign</a>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://blog.nightly.mozilla.org/files/2026/06/image4.png"><img alt="The Firefox settings page in dark mode showing a notification banner that reads, “Same settings, new look!” The message further explains that the page has been reorganized to make settings easier to scan and explore, while keeping all existing settings unchanged. A “Got it” button appears below the message. The “AI Controls” section is visible underneath the banner." class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2072" height="559" src="https://blog.nightly.mozilla.org/files/2026/06/image4.png" width="1431"></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Anna added possibility to search for actions in the redesigned “Applications” section <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2020370">Bug 2020370 – It’s no longer possible to search for actions in the new “Applications” section</a></li>
<li>Anna fixed the Settings navbar layout breakage</li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Firefox Nightly: More Kit, More Control – These Weeks in Firefox: Issue 203]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Highlights

James enabled adaptive autofill in Nightly for testing, which we believe should provide better results in the URL bar when doing autocomplete!
Jack updated the illustrations shown on some of our error pages to match the latest approved designs, giving users more polished artwork when ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693294/tools/firefox-nightly-more-kit-more-control-these-weeks-in-firefox-issue-203/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693294/tools/firefox-nightly-more-kit-more-control-these-weeks-in-firefox-issue-203/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:37:32 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾  Tools</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Highlights</h3>
<ul>
<li>James <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2032547">enabled adaptive autofill in Nightly</a> for testing, which we believe should provide better results in the URL bar when doing autocomplete!</li>
<li>Jack <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2031837">updated the illustrations shown on some of our error pages</a> to match the latest approved designs, giving users more polished artwork when the browser encounters connection or security errors!</li>
</ul>
<p><img alt="Internet connection error page with an adorable Kit illustration" class="aligncenter wp-image-2080 size-full" height="652" src="https://blog.nightly.mozilla.org/files/2026/06/image2-1.png" width="1584"></p>
<ul>
<li>Controls for the Memories feature <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2032998">can now be set during Smart Window onboarding</a></li>
</ul>
<p><img alt='Two radio button controls for the Smart Window Memories feature, including "Chats in Smart Window" and "Browsing across Firefox"' class="aligncenter wp-image-2078 size-full" height="546" src="https://blog.nightly.mozilla.org/files/2026/06/image4-1-e1780509799577.png" width="500"></p>
<p> </p>
<ul>
<li>We’ve disabled the CSS filter implicitly applied to WebExtension pageAction SVG icons across all release channels starting in Firefox 152, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2016509">completing the deprecation</a>
<ul>
<li><b>NOTE:</b> The blog post published at<a href="https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2026/04/23/webextensions-api-changes-firefox-149-152/"> WebExtensions API changes in Firefox 149-152</a> provides to extensions developers more details about this deprecation and links to the related MDN docs.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Friends of the Firefox team</h3>
<h4><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?title=Resolved%20bugs%20(excluding%20employees)&amp;quicksearch=2031599%2C2033820%2C2034178%2C1930213%2C2035355%2C1611643%2C2020302%2C2026007%2C2031015%2C2035252%2C2036528%2C411384%2C2033780%2C2036199%2C1812100%2C1898257%2C2030070%2C2030072">Resolved bugs (excluding employees)</a></h4>
<p><a href="https://github.com/niklasbaumgardner/NewContributorScraper">Script to find new contributors from bug list</a></p>
<h4>Volunteers that fixed more than one bug</h4>
<ul>
<li>Amin Amir</li>
<li>Pranjali Srivastava</li>
<li>Sam Johnson</li>
</ul>
<h4>New contributors (🌟 = first patch)</h4>
<ul>
<li> 🌟:23rd: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1812100">Regression: The new swipe-to-navigation indicator stucks for a moment, when deciding not to navigate the other page</a></li>
<li>🌟Akeem Omosanya: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2035252">Remove commented-out code in SearchService.sys.mjs</a></li>
<li>Amin Amir:
<ul>
<li>🌟<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2031599">Fix browsingContext.sys.mjs to assign to #contextCreatedHandled instead of contextCreatedHandled</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2033820">Fix missing WITHOUT ROWID SQLite performance optimization in SERPCategorization.sys.mjs</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>🌟Sahaj: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2031015">Suggest the default target language for translation after changing the detected source language</a></li>
<li>🌟JIANG Zhirui: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2036199">Breakpad build failed on Windows using VS2026 due to removal of stdext</a></li>
<li> John Iweh: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2030072">Add “Open in New Tab” and “Open in New Container Tab” options to the context menu for Tabs from Other Devices</a></li>
<li>Jak: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2030070">Bookmarks and History – should respect the “When you open a link, image or media in a new tab, switch to it immediately” setting</a></li>
<li>🌟Andy [:rgbcmy]: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1611643">Autoplayed next video should also be PIP</a></li>
<li> konyhéa: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1930213">“Escape” key should collapse the expanded on hover sidebar launcher even if hover is still active.</a></li>
<li> Pranjali Srivastava:
<ul>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1898257">Remove icon property from sidebar extensions</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2026007">Show language-agnostic SelectTranslations context menu item when the source and target languages are the same</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Project Updates</h3>
<h4>Add-ons / Web Extensions</h4>
<h5>Addon Manager &amp; about:addons</h5>
<ul>
<li>Fixed long-standing regression on the autocomplete and datalist popups for extension inline options pages on about:addons (introduced in Firefox 68 by<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1532724"> Bug 1532724</a>, fix shipping in Firefox 152) –<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1595158"> Bug 1595158</a></li>
</ul>
<h5>WebExtensions Framework</h5>
<ul>
<li>Fixed access to web-accessible resources declared with &lt;all_urls&gt; from sandboxed documents (null-principal URLs), restoring extension redirects from the context-menu search flow, starting in Firefox 152 –<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2033905"> Bug 2033905</a></li>
</ul>
<h5>WebExtension APIs</h5>
<ul>
<li>Added exhaustive test coverage for tabs.move() against additional edge cases related to split-view tabs –<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2029092"> Bug 2029092</a></li>
</ul>
<h4>DevTools</h4>
<ul>
<li>Andreas Farre improved the Session History tab in the Application panel (still behind devtools.application.sessionHistory.enabled)
<ul>
<li>added support for remote debugging (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2014064">#2014064</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2016121">#2016121</a>)</li>
<li>made sure that calls to History.replaceState are reflected in the UI (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2037359">#2037359</a>)</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=559949">Julian Descottes [:jdescottes]</a> fixed the most frequent DevTools crash we were observing in Telemetry, adding a guard against IDBTransaction errors when retrieving breakpoints in the Debugger (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2030260">#2030260</a>)</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=557153">Nicolas Chevobbe [:nchevobbe]</a> fixed the image preview tooltip for relative URLs images in constructed stylesheet (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2035503">#2035503</a>)</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=559949">Julian Descottes [:jdescottes]</a> reduced the overhead we had because of network requests monitoring by only decoding response content when the user actually want to see the response (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2026228">#2026228</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h4>WebDriver</h4>
<ul>
<li>Amin Amir cleaned up an <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2031599">incorrect variable assignment</a> in our browsingContext module.</li>
<li>Logan Rosen <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2036603">updated stale references and broken links</a> in our documentation about Marionette.</li>
<li>Sameem improved the Marionette and WebDriver BiDi <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2020302">screenshot commands to enforce maximum allowed dimensions</a>.</li>
<li>Leo McArdle fixed <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2030964">the regression in the “log.entryAdded” event, which lacked an error message in the “text” field for the messages of type “error”</a>.</li>
<li>Henrik Skupin fixed an issue in Marionette where <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2033769">WebDriver:Navigate and WebDriver:Refresh did not handle errors</a> when the underlying navigation failed.</li>
<li>Henrik Skupin <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1839953">improved geckodriver to detect an early Firefox exit during startup on Android</a>, avoiding up to 60 seconds of unnecessary connection attempts.</li>
<li>Henrik Skupin updated the <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2028933">geckodriver CI build job to produce a universal macOS binary</a> supporting both x64 and aarch64.</li>
</ul>
<h4>Lint, Docs and Workflow</h4>
<ul>
<li>Sylvestre <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2023411">ported some linters</a> (e.g. file-whitespace, test-manifest-toml, license, file-perm, rejected-words &amp; more) to Rust to help improve the runtime of the code review bot.</li>
<li>Dale has been working on migration to moz-src for <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2034040">customkeys</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2035086">dom/quota</a> and <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2035295">odom/geolocation</a>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://arewemozsrcyet.com/">https://arewemozsrcyet.com/</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h4>New Tab Page</h4>
<ul>
<li>We did our first region-specific trainhop on May 11th (just 15% of the US), and turned on HNT Nova (and sometimes Widgets) for those clients to get some advance-data of its behaviour in the wild! A note that HNT Nova gets turned on for everybody when Firefox 151 ships on May 19th.
<ul>
<li>We’ll be launching a similar experiment in the DE, probably on May 12th, also at 15% population.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Most of the team is heads down building out a sports-tracking widget, attempting to get that ready in time to be generally available for the upcoming World Cup event.</li>
<li>Dre landed a new world clock widget, which is currently off by default, but pretty snazzy!</li>
</ul>
<p><img alt="World clock widget in New Tab featuring different time zones for YTO, BER, SYD, and LAX." class="aligncenter wp-image-2079 size-full" height="162" src="https://blog.nightly.mozilla.org/files/2026/06/image3-1.png" width="346"></p>
<h4>Search and Urlbar</h4>
<ul>
<li>Nova (URL Bar Design Refresh)
<ul>
<li>Drew and Daisuke continued their work on <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2015612">Nova styling for the Address bar</a> (input and view).</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Search and Suggest
<ul>
<li>Drew finalized two bugs for World Cup and sports suggestions, which were landed and uplifted: one to <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2035322">update the localization string for scheduled games</a> and another to <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2034350">show both teams’ icons in suggestions</a>. Drew also landed and uplifted a fix for <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2035353">rich search suggestion icons being forced into a square aspect ratio</a>.</li>
<li>Standard8 updated Ecosia favicons to the latest branding, including QA testing and publishing.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Settings Redesign (SRD)
<ul>
<li>Stephanie landed a test to <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2021512">ensure search suggestion settings are hidden when quicksuggest is disabled</a>, as well as a patch to <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2031341">resolve TypeScript issues</a> in search.mjs, and is adding test coverage to <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2007397">confirm removed search engines are not displayed in the default engines dropdown</a>.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>General URL Bar and Component Updates
<ul>
<li>Daisuke landed implementation of the <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1893083">context menu on URL bar results</a>, and a fix to <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2020177">show the loading URL in the URL bar when starting up with a homepage</a>.
<ul>
<li>Marco is working on several tasks, including a <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1756564">PDF download / focus stealing issue</a> and <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1924124">allowing arrays to be bound in Sqlite.sys.mjs</a>. Marco also worked on fixes related to Places, such as <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2034743">avoiding replacing the favicons database if it is not corrupt</a>.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Standard8 finalized the <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2028423">URL bar test manifest split</a>. Standard8 also <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2016401">upgraded us to TypeScript 6</a>.</li>
<li>Moritz landed a fix for URL bar abandonment telemetry being recorded when clicking an engine in the unified search button popup (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2032973">Bug 2032973</a>), which was also uplifted. Moritz also <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2034507">simplified search mode switcher item activation in tests</a>, and made it so that <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2036030">the unified search button popup closes when installing an open search engine</a>.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h4>Smart Window</h4>
<ul>
<li>natural language starting with tab close/undo <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2035343">2035343</a> with expandable action log <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2031508">2031508</a></li>
</ul>
<p><img alt="Tab close and undo actions in Smart Window accompanied by an expandable log of actions taken" class="aligncenter wp-image-2077 size-full" height="256" src="https://blog.nightly.mozilla.org/files/2026/06/image1-1.png" width="220"></p>
<ul>
<li>assistant rendering feedback up/down <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2032994">2032994</a> and markdown table <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027029">2027029</a></li>
<li>nova styling blur <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027877">2027877</a> and suggestions <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2026823">2026823</a></li>
<li>accessibility screen reader <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2028676">2028676</a> and keyboard focus <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2037565">2037565</a></li>
<li>optimize conversation starters extra requests <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2030005">2030005</a> and caching <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2033430">2033430</a></li>
</ul>
<h4>Storybook/Reusable Components/Acorn Design System</h4>
<ul>
<li>Nova token updates occasionally, focused on SRD</li>
</ul>
<h4>UX Fundamentals</h4>
<ul>
<li>Added support for the “SEC_ERROR_CA_CERT_INVALID” certificate error to the Felt Privacy error pages. – <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2035942">2035942</a></li>
</ul>
<h4>Settings Redesign</h4>
<ul>
<li>Settings redesign is being tested and will hopefully go out in Firefox 152!</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Hacks.Mozilla.Org: PACT: Anonymous Credentials for the Web]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[This is the technical companion to our update on Distilled, “Keeping the web open and private in the bot era.” Here we take a deeper look at the problem space, the design we’re proposing, and the problems still left to solve. 
Bots (and privacy-preserving browsers) not welcome 
Browse a news site...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693291/tools/hacksmozillaorg-pact-anonymous-credentials-for-the-web/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693291/tools/hacksmozillaorg-pact-anonymous-credentials-for-the-web/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:37:27 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾  Tools</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="c43"><em><span class="c11 c1">This is the technical companion to our update on Distilled, </span><span class="c11 c1 c17"><a class="c5" href="https://blog.mozilla.org/en/privacy-security/keeping-the-web-open-and-private-in-the-bot-era/">“Keeping the web open and private in the bot era.”</a></span><span class="c11 c1"> Here we take a deeper look at the problem space, the design we’re proposing, and the problems still left to </span><span class="c1 c11">solve</span></em><span class="c13 c11 c1"><em>.</em> </span></p>
<h3 class="c24"><span class="c2 c1">Bots (and privacy-preserving browsers) not welcome </span></h3>
<p class="c40"><span class="c0">Browse a news site in a private window. Shop at a major retailer with a VPN. Visit a video streaming platform with anti-fingerprinting defenses tuned up. You’ll see the same responses: registration walls, block pages, and endless CAPTCHAs. The message is clear: </span><span class="c13 c11 c1">if we think you might be a bot, you’re not welcome</span><span class="c0">. </span></p>
<p class="c53"><span class="c0">Websites have valid reasons for wanting to block bots. Bots enable volumetric abuse</span><span class="c1">, abuse that wouldn’t otherwise be feasible if they had to be carried out by humans</span><span class="c0">. </span><span class="c0"> For example</span><span class="c1">: SEO comment spam, credential stuffing and DDoSing</span><span class="c0">.</span><span class="c0"> Consequently many sites employ dedicated anti-abuse tooling which aims to keep the bots out whilst minimizing friction for human visitors. </span></p>
<p class="c21"><span class="c0">Unfortunately, that tooling is increasingly failing at both tasks. Browser privacy protections are </span><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://blog.mozilla.org/en/firefox/fingerprinting-protections/">dismantling</a></span><span class="c0"> the passive signals that anti-abuse systems depended on to identify and distinguish </span><span class="c0">visitors</span><span class="c0">. Meanwhile advances in generative AI have rendered CAPTCHAs ineffective: bots now solve them </span><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://www.usenix.org/system/files/usenixsecurity23-searles.pdf">faster and more reliably</a></span><span class="c0"> than </span><span class="c0">humans</span><span class="c0">. </span></p>
<p class="c33"><span class="c0">Many sites are switching to more invasive mechanisms and now ask visitors to disclose </span><span class="c1">identifying information</span><span class="c0">,</span><span class="c0"> e.g. an email address, a federated login or </span><span class="c1">disabling their VPN</span><span class="c0">. This means greater friction for users, since providing these details on a first visit takes time. It also compromises their privacy, since these details enable the same kinds of cross-site tracking that browser privacy protections were intended to mitigate. </span></p>
<p class="c38"><span class="c0">This </span><span class="c1">leaves</span><span class="c0"> users </span><span class="c1">with a</span><span class="c0"> dilemma. The more effectively they protect their privacy, the harder it is for websites to distinguish them from bots and the worse the treatment they receive. Website operators are also suffering. The additional friction they inflict upon well-behaved visitors harms their site, but many are willing to pay the costs if it mitigates volumetric abuse. </span></p>
<p class="c44"><span class="c1">Browser-based AI agents make this tension more acute. Sites may want to allow agents which are acting on behalf of individual users while blocking agents engaged in volumetric abuse. However, with no effective mechanisms to distinguish the two, websites are opting to block </span><span class="c17 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://dl.acm.org/doi/epdf/10.1145/3730567.3732913">both</a></span><span class="c0">. That hurts users, who should be free to choose the user agent they use to access the web; it hurts new browsers and agents, which struggle to interoperate; and it hurts sites, which lose legitimate visitors.</span></p>
<p class="c30"><span class="c0">The consequence is that the web gets worse for everyone. Users get more friction or less privacy or both. Website operators see more volumetric abuse and the friction they add drives away users </span><span class="c1">who</span><span class="c0"> would otherwise want to consume their content or services. New user</span><span class="c1"> </span><span class="c0">agents struggle to access the same content as conventional browsers. </span></p>
<h3 class="c12"><span class="c20 c1">The</span><span class="c20 c1"> Costs of </span><span class="c2 c1">Convenient</span><span class="c2 c1"> Solutions</span></h3>
<p class="c9"><span class="c0">Some large ecosystem players have put forward solutions that leverage their control of the dominant operating systems and their deep integration with consumer hardware. These rely on device attestation: identifiers and privileged code baked into devices at the hardware level, which let manufacturers prove what software is running on a user’s device. Exposing this functionality to the web means attesting to sites that the user is running approved software with trusted hardware and therefore isn’t a bot. There have been two substantive proposals.</span></p>
<p class="c9"><span class="c0">Google’s Web Environment Integrity, <a href="https://www.theregister.com/software/2023/11/02/google-abandons-web-environment-integrity-api-proposal/335969">abandoned in 2023</a>, was the blunt version. It attested to the user agent itself, as well as the operating system and device in use. Users would have lost control in two ways: once to the attester, which would decide which operating systems and devices could be blessed, and again to the website, which would decide which software to accept. If sites had adopted allow-lists of approved user agents, building a new browser would have become virtually impossible, and sites could have withdrawn access from any user agent they chose.</span></p>
<p class="c9"><span class="c0">Apple’s Private Access Tokens, <a href="https://developer.apple.com/news/?id=huqjyh7k">deployed</a> across their ecosystem in 2022, have more subtle issues. Built on the Privacy Pass protocol standardized at the IETF, they get a lot right: a user receives a renewed, limited batch of one-time tokens that can be presented to websites without linking their visits together. This provides privacy for users and has shown rate limits to be an effective tool for sites – both points we’ll return to later in this post.</span></p>
<p class="c9"><span class="c1">However, Private Access Tokens rely on device attestation, requiring that the hardware manufacturer be in overall control of the user’s device. Presenting a PAT tells a website you are locked into Apple’s rules for what counts as acceptable software. </span><span class="c1">Due to PAT’s technical design</span><sup class="c1"><a href="https://hacks.mozilla.org/?p=48374#:~:text=PAT%20requires">[1]</a></sup><span class="c1">, there’s no way to open the system to other sources of scarcity without compromising the system’s privacy properties, meaning that if more widely deployed, access to the web would</span><span class="c1"> become tied to having bought expensive hardware from a small, hard to change set of vendors</span><span class="c1">. </span></p>
<p class="c9"><span class="c1">Both approaches are ultimately hostile to users and to the openness of the web. Both are premised on parts of a user’s device that sit within the manufacturer’s control and beyond the user’s own. Were they widely deployed, the web would become just another walled garden with centralized gatekeepers controlling acceptable hardware, operating systems and software. As convenient as these solutions are for the players who already dominate the ecosystem, we think there’s a better path.</span></p>
<h3 class="c24"><span class="c2 c1">A Better Path Forward </span></h3>
<p class="c24"><span class="c1">Bots’ harms arise from their ability to operate beyond human scale. For sites to prevent volumetric abuse they</span><span class="c0"> don’t actually need to know </span><span class="c1">the user’s</span><span class="c0"> identity or </span><span class="c1">receive cryptographic</span><span class="c0"> proof that they’re running approved softwar</span><span class="c1">e. If sites knew their visitors were restricted to a rate </span><span class="c1">limit</span><span class="c1"> set by a site, that would be enough.  </span></p>
<p class="c34"><span class="c1">Rate limits</span><span class="c0"> only make sense if </span><span class="c1">they’re</span><span class="c0"> </span><span class="c1">tied to</span><span class="c0"> something scarce; something an attacker can’t cheaply replicate to evade the limit. </span><span class="c0">Without anchoring to a scarce resource, like the trusted hardware used in Private Access Tokens, attackers can generate as many fresh identities as they need to bypass the rate limit. </span></p>
<p class="c56"><span class="c1">However, </span><span class="c0">hardware is just one option for </span><span class="c1">scarcity</span><span class="c0">. Anything a user already has that an attacker can’t trivially spin up at scale will work</span><span class="c1">: e</span><span class="c0">mail addresses and phone numbers are naturally scarce</span><span class="c1">. A paid subscription costs an attacker the same as a real user.  </span><span class="c0">Even maintaining an account on a free service requires </span><span class="c1">some</span><span class="c0"> non-trivial work. </span></p>
<p class="c39"><span class="c0">What if we could use these scarce signals across the web? We</span><span class="c1"> could build </span><span class="c0">an open ecosystem with many parties offering scarcity signals, each site choosing which to accept. By </span><span class="c0">opening up who can provide a signal, and letting sites choose which to accept, we can avoid transferring control to device manufacturers and the resulting harms. </span></p>
<p class="c39"><span class="c1">As a concrete example of who might be well positioned to provide such a signal, we can consider VPN providers acting as a subscription service. Sites routinely block VPN users indiscriminately, whether through a deliberate policy choice or through an indirect consequence of rate limiting visitors per IP address. But a VPN subscription is a perfect source of scarcity. If the VPN provider could vouch for its users so that sites could rate limit each user individually – then users would be able to browse the web with less friction and without giving up their VPN usage. </span></p>
<p class="c35"><span class="c0">The catch is that building </span><span class="c1">a system that can enable this</span><span class="c0"> on the open web whilst </span><span class="c1">maintaining user’s privacy</span><span class="c0"> is genuinely difficult. </span><span class="c1">It requires that we take information from one site — that this user holds some scarce thing — and expose it to other sites so that they can use that as the basis for their rate limiting. </span><span class="c0">Letting one site verify a signal from another is </span><span class="c1">the sort of </span><span class="c0">information flow</span><span class="c1"> </span><span class="c0">that privacy-pr</span><span class="c1">eserving </span><span class="c0">browsers have spent the last decade locking down to </span><span class="c1">prevent cross-site tracking</span><span class="c0">. </span></p>
<p class="c35"><span class="c1">Our goal would be that no more than the minimum information gets through: a single bit communicating whether the user is below the rate limit set by the site. Leaking anything more – like the source of the scarcity that the rate limit is anchored to – would be unacceptable. Enabling a new cross-site information flow might feel like compromising privacy to gain better access, but reality is more nuanced. If a new system moves sites away from demanding that visitors be identifiable (whether through fingerprinting or login forms), </span><span class="c1">it can be a win for both privacy and access.</span></p>
<h3 class="c24"><span class="c2 c1">The Foundations </span></h3>
<p class="c50"><span class="c0">The good news is that the cryptographic foundations for a privacy preserving approach already exist. The </span><span class="c1 c3"><a class="c5" href="https://privacypass.github.io/">Privacy Pass protocol</a></span><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://privacypass.github.io/&amp;sa=D&amp;source=editors&amp;ust=1782228494401139&amp;usg=AOvVaw3uoXdqARBZKjQF5H8uwYKY">,</a></span><span class="c0"> </span><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://www.petsymposium.org/2018/files/papers/issue3/popets-2018-0026.pdf">originally developed in 2018</a></span><span class="c0"> to reduce the friction of Cloudflare CAPTCHAs for Tor users, introduced the core primitive: a token that is </span><span class="c13 c11 c1">unlinkable </span><span class="c0">between issuance and redemption. You prove something to an issuer (e.g. by </span><span class="c1">solving a CAPTCHA</span><span class="c0">), receive some tokens, and later present a token to a website. The website can verify the token is legitimate, but can’t link it to the user it was issued to. </span></p>
<p><img alt="A diagram showing the protocol flow for Privacy Pass." class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-48375" height="1639" src="https://hacks.mozilla.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/pact-drawings-1.excalidraw1-scaled.png" width="2560"></p>
<p class="c27"><img alt="" title=""><span class="c20 c1 c57"><strong>Figure 1</strong>: </span><span class="c0"><em>In Privacy Pass, a CAPTCHA provider can issue tokens to a client which can then be used to bypass challenges for future site visits. Even if the CAPTCHA provider and sites collude, they can’t use the tokens to identify the user or their browsing history.</em> </span></p>
<p class="c52"><span class="c0">Privacy Pass has gone on to be successfully deployed in systems where the issuer and verifier have a prior trust relationship: </span><span class="c0">Apple</span><span class="c0"> uses it to authenticate users of </span><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://hacks.mozilla.org/feed/">Private Cloud Compute</a></span><span class="c0"> </span><span class="c1">and</span><span class="c0"> </span><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://www.apple.com/privacy/docs/iCloud_Private_Relay_Overview_Dec2021.PDF">Private Rel</a></span><span class="c17 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.apple.com/privacy/docs/iCloud_Private_Relay_Overview_Dec2021.PDF&amp;sa=D&amp;source=editors&amp;ust=1782228494402463&amp;usg=AOvVaw0KGoiSPg-8NLvNvIiSSbPt">ay</a></span><span class="c1"> </span><span class="c0">without linking their activity to their identity, </span><span class="c0">Chrome</span><span class="c0"> uses it for </span><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://github.com/GoogleChrome/ip-protection">two-hop IP protection</a></span><span class="c0">, and </span><span class="c0">Kagi</span><span class="c0"> uses it to provide </span><span class="c17 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://help.kagi.com/kagi/privacy/privacy-pass.html">private search</a></span><span class="c0">. </span><span class="c0">These deployments work in part because a small number of parties have agreed in advance on who issues tokens and who accepts them. </span></p>
<p class="c18"><span class="c0">Applying this approach to an open system where any site can act as</span><span class="c0"> an issuer</span><span class="c0"> </span><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1k3QJG2D_Sq4zJiJRn9DfY80hEHuz9UWrJdTt8LbRsMM/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.r8jxzjcoeumo">brings real challenges</a></span><span class="c0">.</span><span class="c0"> Firstly, even though tokens are unlinkable, knowing a user has access to a specific issuer is a privacy leak on its own, because you can infer that the user meets the relevant issuance criteria. </span><span class="c1">If one site can learn that you have a token from another site, that reveals that you have been to that site, which can be a major privacy problem. </span><span class="c0">This compounds if </span><span class="c1">sites </span><span class="c0">can learn the set of issuers </span><span class="c1">you have visited</span><span class="c0">, since it becomes a fingerprint which can be used to identify </span><span class="c1">you</span><span class="c0">. </span></p>
<p class="c8"><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2014/11/27/zero-knowledge-proofs-illustrated-primer/">Generic techniques</a></span><span class="c0"> exist for proving a statement in zero knowledge: we can prove that </span><span class="c1">a client</span><span class="c0"> ha</span><span class="c1">s</span><span class="c0"> a token from a set of acceptable issuers without revealing which specific issuer it is. We’ll call this issuer blinding. </span><span class="c0">The generic approach is often slow, but </span><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-orru-zkproof-sigma-protocols-01.html">bespoke approaches</a></span><span class="c0"> tailored to the underlying cryptography can improve this considerably. </span></p>
<p class="c54"><span class="c0">Another challenge is how sites using rate limits decide who to trust to issue tokens. If an issuer misbehaves then the site’s rate limits become ineffective, enabling volumetric abuse. However, if we need to prevent the site from learning which issuers a user has access to, the site is only going to know that one of its trusted issuers was used, not which one. This makes mistakes or misbehaviour by an issuer difficult to detect, and makes it hard for sites to evaluate new issuers. Solving this challenge is essential for openness. Without adequate information, </span><span class="c0">sites are likely to lean towards conservative issuer selection. </span><span class="c1">That could lead to less choice between Anchors, which in turn could lead to a new form of gatekeeper being created.</span><span class="c0"> </span></p>
<p class="c32"><span class="c0">To solve this, sites at least need a way to calculate an aggregate score for each issuer they use. This should roughly correspond to how much of the traffic it considers abusive to have come from users using that particular issuer. Mozilla has long invested in systems like </span><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://blog.mozilla.org/en/firefox/partnership-ohttp-prio/">Prio</a></span><span class="c0"> which use multiparty computation (MPC) to protect user privacy whilst enabling aggregate measurements of system behaviour. </span></p>
<p class="c59"><span class="c0">Privacy Pass also struggles to handle dynamic adjustments to rate limits. Once tokens have been issued, they’re difficult to invalidate without either revoking all active tokens or risking attacks which can compromise the privacy of users. It’s also beneficial if sites can adjust rate limits on a per </span><span class="c1">client</span><span class="c0"> basis, for example by increasing rate limits where they become more confident the </span><span class="c1">client</span><span class="c0"> is benign and withdrawing access </span><span class="c1">when abuse is detected</span><span class="c0">. </span></p>
<p class="c47"><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-schlesinger-cfrg-act-00.html">Anonymous Credit Tokens</a></span><span class="c0"> </span><span class="c0">offer a useful building block to solve this problem. Conventional Privacy Pass schemes rely on issuing a bucket of tokens but ACT works differently by enabling the use of a credential with state. For example, an ACT credential can hold an internal counter. When the credential is presented, the site can check the counter is over some threshold and mutate it, increasing or decreasing </span><span class="c1">the counter whenever</span><span class="c0"> the site’s perception of the holder has improved or worsened. Critically, the exact value is never leaked to the site, preventing the site from tracking the holder and ensuring successive presentations of the same credential can’t be linked. </span></p>
<h3 class="c24"><span class="c2 c1">Putting it together </span></h3>
<p class="c19"><span class="c1">So how can we combine these techniques to build a system which can enable privacy-preserving rate limiting on the open web? In May 2026, we participated in a </span><a href="https://pactworkshop.com/"><span class="c17 c1">W3C CG Meeting</span></a><span class="c0"> in collaboration with Cloudflare, Chrome and other web stakeholders in which we started sketching out a design we’re calling PACT – Private Access Control Tokens. </span></p>
<p class="c19"><span class="c0">Rate limits need a starting point, a source of scarcity to anchor on. We’ll call an entity that provides such a source an </span><span class="c2 c1">Anchor</span><span class="c0">. To a user who meets the Anchor’s criteria, like having a subscription,</span><span class="c0"> an account in good standing</span><span class="c0">, or a verified phone number, an Anchor issues a batch of </span><span class="c2 c1">Endorsement </span><span class="c0">tokens, following the Privacy Pass model. In practice, Anchors could be any website which has access to this kind of signal. An Endorsement conveys</span><span class="c1"> </span><span class="c0">scarcity to other sites. </span></p>
<p class="c51"><span class="c0">That’s enough for a simple system where access is </span><span class="c1">either granted or denied</span><span class="c0">. But as we discussed earlier, we also want the ability to increase access where a visitor behaves benignly and decrease it where they don’t. </span><span class="c1">The state needed to enforce a rate limit</span><span class="c0"> can’t live in the Endorsement, because Endorsements cross trust boundaries between unrelated sites. We need a second object that can hold that state, scoped to the party that maintains it. </span></p>
<p class="c48"><span class="c0">We’ll call that the party that handles rate limiting for a site a </span><span class="c2 c1">Moderator </span><span class="c0">and the stateful object a </span><span class="c2 c1">Credential</span><span class="c0">. </span><span class="c1">A Credential is specific to a Moderator and, unlike endorsements, we limit each site to nominating a single Moderator. In the common case the site itself plays the Moderator role, so there’s no new entity or trust boundary. </span><span class="c1">A Moderator can also be a third-party service shared across many sites, allowing those sites to cooperatively share a rate limit.</span><span class="c0"> </span></p>
<p class="c48"><span class="c0">In the terminology of the previous section, the Anchor is the issuer of Endorsements, and the Moderator both verifies Endorsements and issues Credentials. A Moderator manages rate-limit policy: it decides which Anchors it trusts, accepts their Endorsements, and issues a Credential in return.</span></p>
<p class="c14"><img alt="" title=""><img alt="A diagram showing an overview of the PACT system" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-48381" height="1655" src="https://hacks.mozilla.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/pact-drawings-5.excalidraw21-scaled.png" width="2560"></p>
<p class="c14"><strong><span class="c1 c20">Figure 2: </span></strong><span class="c1"><em>(1) Clients acquire Endorsements from Anchors in the course of normal browsing to sites they have relationships with. (2) Clients can exchange Endorsements for a stateful Credential from a Moderator. (3) Credentials can be used to access sites which use that Moderator. Credentials can be updated over time.</em> </span></p>
<p class="c41"><span class="c0">Directly revealing which Anchor backed an Endorsement would leak a lot of information about the user. The issuer blinding techniques from the previous section solve this: when an Endorsement is redeemed, the Moderator only learns that it came from one of </span><span class="c1">the </span><span class="c0">Anchors it trusts, but not which one. </span></p>
<p class="c28"><span class="c0">When a Moderator covers more than one site, we let Credentials be presented across all of them but partition cookies and storage as</span><span class="c1"> we would for any other third party site</span><span class="c0">. The unlinkability of </span><span class="c1">Credential</span><span class="c0"> presentations keeps this from creating a new cross-site identifier. The benefit is that good behaviour on one site improves access on every site the Moderator covers, and bad behaviour cuts it everywhere. Websites can already build the same capability with a shared account system, so this doesn’t create a new way to lock users out, but it </span><span class="c1">does provide a</span><span class="c0"> new way to grant access without requiring users to give up their privacy. </span></p>
<p class="c28"><span class="c0">Enabling Moderators that cover many sites carries a centralisation risk, simila</span><span class="c1">r </span><span class="c0">to the concentration we see today in anti-abuse providers. The mitigation is that the choice of Moderator stays with each site, and the choice of trusted Anchors stays with each Moderator. Th</span><span class="c1">is</span><span class="c0"> </span><span class="c1">can’t</span><span class="c0"> reverse the centralisation pressure the web already faces, but it </span><span class="c1">ensures this system won’t lead to additional lock-in</span><span class="c0">: a new Anchor or a new Moderator can be adopted without coordinating with a dominant vendor. </span></p>
<p class="c46"><span class="c0">The </span><span class="c1">system then has three flows</span><span class="c0">.</span><span class="c0"> First, the user </span><span class="c1">receives</span><span class="c0"> Endorsements from an Anchor in the course of normal interaction</span><span class="c1">, based on the Anchor’s positive view of the user</span><span class="c0">. This is </span><span class="c0">a relatively rare operation for any given user and Anchor. After all, as our source of scarcity, Endorsements should not be too easy to accumulate.</span></p>
<p class="c10"><img alt="" title=""><img alt="A diagram showing the PACT Anchor Flow" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-48377" height="1789" src="https://hacks.mozilla.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/pact-drawings-3.excalidraw1-scaled.png" width="2560"></p>
<p class="c10"><strong><span class="c20 c1">Figure 3</span></strong><span class="c1">: <em>In the course of normal browsing, clients browse to websites they have a relationship with. These sites can act as Anchors by issuing Endorsements to clients.</em></span></p>
<p class="c26"><span class="c0">Second, when the user arrives at a site that works with a Moderator, the browser spends an Endorsement from an Anchor the Moderator trusts and receives a Credential in return. The presentation hides </span><span class="c13 c11 c1">which </span><span class="c0">Anchor was used, and </span><span class="c1">neither the Anchor nor the Moderator can trace the Endorsement back to where it was issued</span><span class="c0">. The Moderator decides what initial balance the Credential starts with. If the user has no Endorsements from suitable Anchors at all, existing mechanisms (CAPTCHAs, account creation, federated login) </span><span class="c1">could be used to</span><span class="c0"> bootstrap a Credential the same way, so the system degrades to today’s experience rather than locking the user out.</span></p>
<p class="c7"><img alt="" title=""><img alt="A diagram showing the protocol flow between Anchors and Moderators" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-48378" height="1789" src="https://hacks.mozilla.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/pact-drawings-4.excalidraw1-scaled.png" width="2560"></p>
<p class="c7"><span class="c20 c1"><strong>Figure 4</strong></span><span class="c1"><strong>:</strong><em> When the client browses to a site, it can prompt the client for a Credential from the Moderator it uses. If the Client doesn’t have a suitable Credential, but does have a suitable Endorsement, it can exchange it for a Credential with the Moderator. In practice, the Moderator and the Site might be the same server. </em></span><em><span class="c0"> </span></em></p>
<p class="c25"><span class="c0">Third, as the user browses, the browser presents the Credential and the Moderator updates </span><span class="c1">the internal state of the Credential</span><span class="c0">. The </span><span class="c1">Moderator can reward </span><span class="c0">behaviour that looks benign and </span><span class="c1">penalize suspicious activity</span><span class="c0">, </span><span class="c1">but can’t track the use of the Credential or identify it if it’s used on other sites the Moderator covers</span><span class="c0">. </span><span class="c0">Revocation falls out of the same mechanism: a Moderator </span><span class="c1">can refuse to return an updated Credential</span><span class="c0">.</span><span class="c0"> </span></p>
<p class="c7"><img alt="" title=""><img alt="A diagram showing the PACT Moderator Flow" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-48379" height="1618" src="https://hacks.mozilla.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/pact-drawings-5.excalidraw1-scaled.png" width="2560"></p>
<p class="c7"><strong><span class="c20 c1">Figure 5</span></strong><span class="c0"><strong>:</strong> <em>The Client can present the Credential on sites which use the matching Moderator. Sites can check if the Credential is in good standing. The sites can then adjust the access the Credential has in response to behaviour. E.g. increasing it when they gain confidence in the client or reducing it in response to malicious behaviour.</em></span></p>
<p class="c23"><span class="c0">In practice, all of this would happen transparently to the user through a WebAPI that sites acting as Anchors or Moderators would call from JavaScript. In an ideal ecosystem, users would accumulate Endorsements through normal browsing, just by virtue of the sites they already visit, and the rest of the flow would happen in the background as they move around the web, leaving </span><span class="c1">users</span><span class="c0"> with meaningfully less friction. </span></p>
<p class="c16"><span class="c0">AI agents acting on behalf of a user slot into the same flow. An agent can carry its user’s Credentials, in which case the user remains accountable for how the agent </span><span class="c1">behaves.</span><span class="c0"> </span><span class="c1">S</span><span class="c0">ites would not need to grant any more access than they would to the user themselves. Alternatively, the operator of an agent can run its own Anchor and vouch for its agents the way other Anchors vouch for human users. </span><span class="c0">Sites retain control over which Anchors they accept, so they can choose how to treat agent traffic without needing a separate detection mechanism. </span></p>
<p class="c6"><span class="c0">Several mechanisms combine to keep the information about a user that flows out close to a single bit. Cryptographic unlinkability ensures successive Credential presentations cannot be tied to each other or to the original issuance, so a user’s visits cannot be </span><span class="c1">joined</span><span class="c0"> into a history. Each site is bound to a single Moderator, so the set of Moderators a user has Credentials with never becomes a cross-site fingerprint. The Anchor-to-Credential exchange happens in an isolated browsing context, so during ordinary browsing the only thing the site or its Moderator ever observes is a Credential presentation: </span><span class="c1">the site only learns if </span><span class="c0">the user has a valid Credential below the rate limit, or </span><span class="c1">nothing</span><span class="c0">. </span><span class="c1">W</span><span class="c0">hen the Moderator updates a </span><span class="c1">Credential</span><span class="c0">, it</span><span class="c0"> adjusts the credentials state without learning what it is.</span></p>
<p class="c6"><span class="c1">The additional privacy given to users from </span><span class="c0">Issuer blinding</span><span class="c1"> makes participating in the system more challenging for Moderators</span><span class="c0">. Because the Moderator can’t see which Anchor backed a Credential at issuance, it can’t give a Credential from a strong Anchor </span><span class="c1">more access</span><span class="c0"> than one from a weak Anchor: doing so would itself leak which Anchor was used. The initial </span><span class="c1">access</span><span class="c0"> has to be uniform across the Moderator’s whole pool of Anchors, which in practice means setting it at the strength of the weakest. </span><span class="c1">However, this is only relevant for that initial access, the Moderator can update credentials according to the holder’s behavior, enabling Credential’s to accrue access over time.</span></p>
<p class="c42"><span class="c0">Building an open ecosystem also requires that sites can make effective decisions about the Anchors they choose to trust</span><span class="c1">. M</span><span class="c0">ultiparty computation systems like </span><span class="c0">Prio</span><span class="c0"> enable aggregate scoring without compromising pr</span><span class="c1">ivacy</span><span class="c0">. When users present Credentials, they can provide an encrypted share which identifies the anchor they use</span><span class="c1">d and can be privately aggregated to compute the quality of an issuer.</span></p>
<h3 class="c24"><span class="c2 c1">Next Steps </span></h3>
<p class="c49"><span class="c1">We think the</span><span class="c0"> architecture we</span><span class="c1">’ve </span><span class="c0">sketched </span><span class="c1">for PACT </span><span class="c0">has the right shape, but many of the details still need to be worked out</span><span class="c1"> and the entire system needs rigorous privacy and security analysis.</span></p>
<p class="c45"><span class="c0">We want to do that work in the open. The IETF is the natural venue for the cryptographic protocols underneath, and the W3C for the WebAPI surface that sits on top. </span><span class="c0">We’ll be </span><span class="c1">bringing</span><span class="c0"> </span><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://github.com/Moderation-of-unLinkable-Endorsements">draft specifications</a></span><span class="c1"> to these bodies as soon as they’re ready</span><span class="c0">, and we welcome collaborators from across the ecosystem: browser vendors, site operators, anti-abuse providers, and the cryptography community. </span></p>
<p class="c29"><span class="c0">If successful, we think we can provide a system which will keep the web open and </span><span class="c1">private</span><span class="c0">, while still giving sites the rate-limiting signal they need. </span></p>
<h3 class="c29"><span class="c2 c1">Acknowledgements</span></h3>
<p class="c4"><em><span class="c11 c1">The ideas described here are the result of collaboration and conversations with many people, including: Watson Ladd, Thibault Meunier, Michele Orrù, Trevor Perrin, Eric Rescorla, Samuel Schlesinger, Martin Thomson, Eric Trouton, Benjamin Vandersloot &amp; Cathie Yun.</span></em><span class="c11 c1"><em> </em> </span></p>
<hr class="c58">
<div>
<p class="c31"><a href="https://hacks.mozilla.org/?p=48374#:~:text=%5B1%5D">[1]</a><span class="c0"> PAT requires that the source of scarcity and an independent issuer be trusted not to collude. If they do, they can track users as they interact with the system. This is not suitable in the context of an open system where any party could play those two roles.</span></p>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://hacks.mozilla.org/2026/06/pact-anonymous-credentials-for-the-web/">PACT: Anonymous Credentials for the Web</a> appeared first on <a href="https://hacks.mozilla.org/">Mozilla Hacks - the Web developer blog</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The Rust Programming Language Blog: The many journeys of learning Rust]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[This is another post in our series covering what we learned through the Vision Doc process. We previously described the overall approach and what we learned about doing user research, we explored what people love about Rust, dug into what it takes to ship safety-crticial Rust, and described some ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693289/tools/the-rust-programming-language-blog-the-many-journeys-of-learning-rust/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693289/tools/the-rust-programming-language-blog-the-many-journeys-of-learning-rust/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:37:24 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾  Tools</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This is another post in our series covering what we learned through the Vision Doc process. We previously <a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2025/12/03/lessons-learned-from-the-rust-vision-doc-process/" rel="external">described the overall approach and what we learned about doing user research</a>, we <a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2025/12/19/what-do-people-love-about-rust/" rel="external">explored what people love about Rust</a>, <a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/01/14/what-does-it-take-to-ship-rust-in-safety-critical/" rel="external">dug into what it takes to ship safety-crticial Rust</a>, and <a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/03/20/rust-challenges/" rel="external">described some of the major challenges that people face when using Rust</a>.</em></p>
<p>In this post we walk through what folks have found on their journey to learn the Rust programming language with ups and downs covered.</p>
<p>As a disclaimer, LLMs (Large Language Models) come up in this post because our interviewees brought them up. We're scoping discussion to their use as a learning tool, covering research and example generation, not broader questions about AI (Artificial Intelligence) in software development.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#many-paths-to-needing-rust"></a>
Many paths to needing Rust</h3>
<p>The interviews surfaced several different paths into Rust: curiosity, embedded work, job-market pressure, organizational adoption, and reassignment after a team or company chose Rust. That last path matters because many learners are not evaluating Rust from a blank slate; they are trying to become productive after Rust has already arrived in their work.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"Funny enough, I've advocated for more niche languages than Rust in the past. Rust has pretty much stopped being as much of a niche language as it was, but it's not Java." -- Fractional CTO</p>
</blockquote>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#rust-learning-resources"></a>
Rust learning resources</h3>
<p>Likely as expected, the folks that we talked to reach for a range of resources to learn Rust. Some reach for official documentation, such as <a href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/" rel="external">The Rust Programming Language Book</a> and find that sufficient to build on what the compiler was already showing them.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"I started with the official Rust documentation because there are a lot of great examples of how features like the borrow checker work." -- Software engineer at an Automotive supplier</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Others needed more passes and more formats, sometimes reaching for resources the community maintains, such as <a href="https://rustlings.rust-lang.org/" rel="external">Rustlings</a>, <a href="https://danielkeep.github.io/tlborm/book/index.html" rel="external">The Little Book of Rust Macros</a>, and <a href="https://rust-unofficial.github.io/too-many-lists/" rel="external">Learn Rust With Entirely Too Many Linked Lists</a>.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"The first time I went through the chapter in [The Rust Programming Language] on borrow checking, I was like, what is this? I read it again, then I watched a YouTube video of someone explaining the chapter." -- Rust freelance consultant</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>"Rust book, Rustlings, Zero to Production in Rust, Jon Gjengset tutorials. A bunch of books. It's not a one-pass reading. Can't say how many times I've gone through it." -- Software engineer working on video streaming and storage</p>
</blockquote>
<p>These resources have brought up an entire generation of Rust programmers. But, to some, there is a perception that these resources have trouble keeping pace with the language.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"We'd like to use [The Rust Programming Language/'the book'], but we've found that it's out of date, unfortunately. We've looked at the GitHub repo and found it's got a lot of unresolved issues and unmerged PRs" -- Principal Software Engineering work on Rust adoption in a regulated industry</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Whether or not this is factually true, Rust's growth has nonetheless put more scrutiny on these materials. Companies evaluating adoption and engineers getting reassigned to Rust teams are looking at them with fresh eyes and finding the gaps that affect their own evaluation.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#beginner-stumblings-and-unlearning-habits"></a>
Beginner stumblings and unlearning habits</h3>
<p>It's pretty typical for Rust to be the 2nd, 3rd or Nth programming language that someone picks up. They'd end up writing their most familiar language in Rust, whether C++ patterns, Java patterns, or whatever they knew, for months or even years. Eventually they got comfortable enough to start writing idiomatic Rust.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"There's a bit of a drop in productivity compared to C if you're already familiar with it just because you're learning new rules, new syntax."  -- Principal Firmware Engineer (mobile robotics)</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>"In the beginning it was more poking around the code and adding and removing some ampersands and asterisks to try to make sense of <code>mut</code> and not <code>mut</code> and whatever." -- Senior engineer with 20 years of Java experience in cloud and IoT</p>
</blockquote>
<p>We also spoke with someone who found that not having much of a programming background seemed to benefit people picking up Rust. Not having worn-in grooves from other languages may play a role here, and it's worth investigating further.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"I had someone who had never programmed much before start working on the internals of [our Rust project]. She was just fine with getting into Rust. It's more of the senior people that struggle as they need to unlearn practices which may work in other languages, but it's not the 'Rust' way." -- Researcher, Automotive OEM R&amp;D Lab</p>
</blockquote>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#learning-to-work-with-the-borrow-checker"></a>
Learning to work with the borrow checker</h3>
<p>We heard a lot about learning to work with the borrow checker instead of against it. People get there through different paths, but a few patterns came up repeatedly.</p>
<h4><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#the-compiler-as-teacher"></a>
The compiler as teacher</h4>
<p>Rust's diagnostics did the teaching on their own, especially around lifetimes.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"If you mess up the lifetimes in a piece of code that you've written by hand, I usually find that Rust's diagnostics are very helpful" -- Researcher working on static analysis of Rust programs</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>"Whatever's missing, the compiler usually fills in: it tells me 'you need to declare the lifetime of this reference', so I know and can figure it out. That all generally works pretty well." -- Senior Software Engineer</p>
</blockquote>
<h4><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#learning-by-doing"></a>
Learning by doing</h4>
<p>Others felt like they only really internalized the borrow checker after writing a lot of Rust. It took projects, coding challenges, prototyping and so on until at some point it clicked.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"I actually did not understand the borrow checker until I spent a lot of time writing Rust" -- Founder of a startup built on Rust</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>"Besides the prototyping work, I also did coding-challenge-type stuff to get familiar with Rust for Advent of Code. [..] It eventually clicked to the point where I wasn't fighting with Rust, it was working for me. I had that experience other people describe: when I managed to get my program to fit with Rust, it worked. I didn't spend time debugging." -- Principal Software Engineer, large SaaS provider</p>
</blockquote>
<h4><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#letting-go-of-clone-guilt"></a>
Letting go of "clone guilt"</h4>
<p>Some learners arrive with the assumption that good Rust means zero clones, zero copies, lifetimes threaded through everything. They set the bar at optimal before they've learned how to write idiomatic Rust, and it makes the borrow checker feel harder than it needs to be at the outset.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"On one of my first projects, I was like, 'I don't ever want to copy or clone anything,' so I carefully wove through all the lifetimes and got myself into a bit of a bind. Then I saw someone else just cloning the struct I was working with, and it was super cheap. Sometimes you can just clone and it's going to be okay." -- Researcher at a university</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The experienced Rust developers we spoke with consistently said the same thing: clone freely while you're learning, then optimize when you understand the problem. Rust's reputation for performance and correctness feeds this. Newcomers assume anything less than optimal is wrong before they've written a first working program, and clone guilt is how that shows up.</p>
<p>We think it could be an interesting area of future study to check into the patterns Rust programmers employ at different levels of experience and under which circumstances. One member of the Rust Vision doc team that's very experienced with Rust noted that there's kind of an "expected shape" they understand as passing the compiler. This knowledge influences how they approach writing code which wouldn't take that shape and they naturally find themselves understanding when to use so-called workarounds, such as passing around indices into arrays or <code>Vec</code>s.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#multi-paradigm-but-not-the-oop-some-are-used-to"></a>
Multi-paradigm, but not the OOP some are used to</h3>
<p>The Rust programming language is multi-paradigm, and how that lands depends on what you're coming from. We heard some that came from a functional background were delighted with digging into learning how much Rust inherits from that lineage. Some others noted that they and others on their teams struggled to unlearn the object-oriented style they'd come to use heavily in other languages like C++ and Java.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"Developers coming from C++ tend to think object-oriented. I think that's a difference between C++ and Rust." -- Architect at Automotive OEM</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>"I had exactly that thing, where I would apply all my years of Java and JS thinking, where I could just create some object, not care about it, return it, have it sloshing around between various functions. Found myself reaching for these patterns and then being told 'no, you cannot do that'." -- Principal Engineer at a SaaS company</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Developers coming from functional programming had less to unlearn: strong typing, pattern matching, and an expression-oriented style were already familiar.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"My background has been more functional programming, strong typing. That originated for me as a Lisper: once a Lisper, always a Lisper." -- Principal Software Engineer working on Rust tooling for safety-regulated industries</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>"The languages I primarily used before Rust were things like OCaml. Way back, I came from C and C++, the classic languages, and then I spent quite a long time doing primarily pure functional stuff. These days I've ended up back in what I like to think of as a pragmatic center ground [with Rust]." -- Fractional CTO</p>
</blockquote>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#teaching-rust-in-academia"></a>
Teaching Rust in academia</h3>
<p>We spoke with a university professor that's been teaching Rust generally. In the academic environment, they were able to use proxies for some things such as "traits are like interfaces in Java" because the students had already gone through a set of courses in their first and second years that taught them Java. They introduced concepts slowly throughout the course, choosing to deal with some more complex topics like generics later. The outcome generally was that students had no problem picking up Rust in this setting.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"I couldn't see any big difference on the embedded side. We also teach an embedded class, and we did an experiment. Half of the students' feedback was worse on the Rust class, mostly because they needed to build the project themselves. The C students just got one from [an LLM], absolutely no problem." -- University Professor, on teaching Rust</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The C cohort leaned on LLMs for the project in ways the Rust cohort couldn't. We don't yet have a clear answer for why.</p>
<p>What did come through clearly was the Rust cohort's experience with the community. Some students needed to figure out which drivers to use for the embedded project and how to use them. Their professor encouraged them to open issues and ask questions directly on GitHub, and the maintainers responded. Students who had never contributed to open source before were getting answers from the people who wrote the code.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#learning-using-llms"></a>
Learning using LLMs</h3>
<p>Some experienced folks shared that they saw LLMs as a tool that can help someone come up to speed quickly, either as a research tool or for generating example Rust code to understand concepts.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"I'm optimistic that there's a way to work [LLMs] in that will cut down that learning curve. One of the big things these tools bring is reducing the learning curve in general; these are very good tools to help you navigate a space that you don't know yet." -- Maintainer of large open source Rust crate</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>"I try [LLMs] out once a month, usually for generating an example or something like this. Just like with Stack Overflow: when you read an example, you should read it carefully and try to understand it. Not copy and paste it, but type it in your own words in code and then check it, because that's where the teeny tiny little mistakes are." -- Founder of startup built on Rust</p>
</blockquote>
<p>For some learners, an LLM is just another way to find answers, no different than a search engine.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"So for the most part, picking up Rust - how do I learn? I'll [use web search for] things, I'll ask [an LLM], I'll just poke around and read the code." -- Senior Software Engineer working in a regulated space</p>
</blockquote>
<p>One founder went further and claimed that LLMs change who can become a Rust developer. One consulting company founder described hiring high school graduates with no systems programming background and training them as Rust developers, with LLMs filling in the learning gaps that would previously have required years of experience.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"At the beginning, I was worried, but now that we have [LLMs] supporting development, the difficulty of the language doesn't matter. I'm seeing a huge opportunity behind strong runtime languages like Rust. [..] In [Developing Country] we hire 20-25 high school graduates, train them to be Rust programmers, then they enhance our workforce worldwide." -- Founder of a consulting company</p>
</blockquote>
<p>We heard this from one organization. This is a claim that the combination of Rust's compiler and LLM tooling can dramatically shorten the path from beginner to working developer. Whether it generalizes depends on questions we can't answer from a single interview: how long these developers stay, what kind of code they can maintain independently, and whether this training/learning model works outside this company's particular structure. If it holds up, the pool of people who can become Rust developers is much larger than the usual hiring profile suggests.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#organizational-considerations-for-rust-learners"></a>
Organizational considerations for Rust learners</h3>
<p>We spoke with a number of folks on teams that are using Rust in larger organizations. Teams wanted to know that everyone would end up at roughly the same level of competence, which led a good number to invest in training courses to get there. Some leaders found that staff was able to ramp well enough by reading The Rust Programming Language, going through Rustlings, and then picking up lower risk and priority tickets to work on. Having a sense of community was also important within companies; it helps people know they are not alone when they are asked to work on Rust after, say, a reorganization happens.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"[..] the idea with the class as opposed to 'just read the Rust book on your own' was that this gives everyone kind of the same baseline going in."  -- Principal Firmware Engineer (mobile robotics)</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>"So typically we're going to have people work through Rustlings, work through The Rust Programming Language. We have them then start to pick up lower risk tickets to work on." -- Principal Engineer at a large SaaS provider</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>"We've got an internal Slack channel for Rust learning where people can drop questions and others will come in and answer them. That helps build up understanding and community." -- Software Engineer at a large corporation</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Some organizations found that while the person they'd hire would need to learn Rust, it was still preferable to the alternative of hiring someone for a critical piece of software written in another language.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"They needed to grow and maintain this C++ codebase. They had a C++ wizard, and they tried for about two years to find someone with the same level of expertise. They ended up hiring people that didn't know Rust and ramping them up, creating FFI bindings from the C++ side so they could work in Rust. And you can feel it: the borrow checker is teaching these people the right way to handle their systems." -- Principal Engineer at an Automotive OEM</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The community and helping each other aspect seems to grow bonds as organizations mature.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"Our team is [all about] mentorship. I've mentored people coming up to speed on Rust, and people help each other hugely." -- Principal Software Engineer at a large SaaS company</p>
</blockquote>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#silent-attrition"></a>
Silent attrition</h3>
<p>We identified some cases where people have approached Rust and bounced off of it, for one reason or another. In the below case, someone with a background in a language with fewer guardrails found themselves frustrated enough with Rust to walk away.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"All of that means that that embedded ecosystem is very frustrating to somebody who comes from C and is like, why can't I just get a pointer to this peripheral and then write into the registers. What are you doing to me? [..] My friend never got over that. He looked at it and said, I'm not going to deal with this and walked away." -– A second University Professor</p>
</blockquote>
<p>There may be language features that for a particular domain are not seen as comfortable or usable yet, such as async Rust usage in a safety domain. We'd like to map which language features feel off-limits in which domains; async in safety-critical work probably isn't the only case.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"We're not fully sure how async [Rust] will work out in the long run in our domain. [..] People don't feel comfortable yet since C++14 doesn't provide such concepts. [..] It's the chicken-and-egg problem again: we probably need to gain some experience to see whether we can actually benefit from these new concepts in the automotive and safety domains." -- Team Lead at Automotive Supplier (ASIL D target)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>We heard in at least one case, that while the language was challenging and there was a near bounce, the tooling helped keep them coming back and trying.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"Well, I think my early impressions of Rust - one is I find C++ so intimidating, and I think a big part of why I was able to succeed at [..] learning Rust is the tooling. I mean, all this makes sense [..] but it's like, for me, getting started with Rust, the language was challenging, but the tooling was incredibly easy." -- Founder of another startup built on Rust</p>
</blockquote>
<p>While it might be considered more of a community concern, if there are interactions online and in spaces that point to learners having
so-called "skill issues" this feeds into the narrative that Rust must be hard to learn. We may be unintentionally turning away Rust Project contributors and maintainers due to the vibes being put out when new learners show up in certain spaces.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"People are very helpful, but generally the attitude is: if your program is very complicated, it's mostly a skill issue. There's not that much empathy when people get stuck learning, and a lot of people are just pushed away by it. There's probably a huge number of people who silently stop wanting to write Rust, because at some point it gets complicated and the feedback they get is 'you just need to be a better programmer, obviously'." -- Software Engineer at a SaaS Provider</p>
</blockquote>
<h4><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#feedback-on-near-bounces-from-survey"></a>
Feedback on near-bounces from survey</h4>
<p>We found a few interesting perspectives collected in the Rust Vision doc survey which we administered with examples of bouncing and coming back:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"I started before 1.0, got stuck very soon when trying to translate patterns from C++ to Rust (due to borrow checking). I tried again after 1.0 and it stuck. [..]" -- Survey Respondent A</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Survey Respondent A went on to share in a more detailed response about a perceived weakness in Rust learning materials related to lifetimes and the borrow checker are explained. There was an observation that it's fairly easy to run into more complex situations with lifetimes and the borrow checker. They felt that the current state of this sort of material and tutorials is fairly superficial and can leave learners stuck when they run into those more complex situations.</p>
<p>One respondent that bounced once and came back shared challenges around usage of async. In concert with Rust's memory-safety and the borrow checker, they found some of the nitty-gritty details of async were difficult to learn. While we're aware of the Rust Project's continuous efforts to improve Rust's async story, this is another data point of a user that faced challenges.</p>
<p>Another survey respondent shared how they had multiple times bounced in trying to learn Rust. They returned after a year or so and found Rustlings to be highly motivating. We note that having multiple pathways for folks to learn Rust opens up more possibilities for those that nearly bounced, just like this person.</p>
<h4><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#need-more-focused-work-on-silent-attritrion"></a>
Need more focused work on silent attritrion</h4>
<p>The thing that stood out most to us was the lack of real, first-hand knowledge of having bounced when learning Rust. While this is an obvious effect of soliciting answers to our survey and opportunities to interview through Rust channels and our networks, this cohort is good future candidate where interviews could start.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#conclusions"></a>
Conclusions</h3>
<p>Across these conversations, the experience of learning Rust depended heavily on context. Why someone was learning and what support they had mattered as much as the borrow checker. The same kinds of examples kept coming up: a training course that got a team to a shared baseline, a maintainer answering a student's first GitHub issue, and a colleague whose code showed that cloning was okay.</p>
<p>That context is largely something the community has a hand in. With that in mind, here is what we take away from what we heard, and what we still don't know.</p>
<h4><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#what-seems-worth-trying"></a>
What seems worth trying</h4>
<p><strong>Learning materials aimed at unlearning.</strong> Syntax barely came up when people described their struggles. People struggled with unlearning habits from previous languages, whether OOP structuring from C++ and Java or the instinct to grab a raw pointer to a peripheral. Most of our learning materials teach Rust from first principles, and that works. What we didn't come across is much written for, say, the engineer with ten years of Java who lands on a Rust team after a reorg: material that names the patterns they'll reach for that won't transfer, and shows what to do instead. The professor we spoke with did a version of this in the classroom, leaning on "traits are like interfaces in Java" and saving generics for later in the course, and the students did fine. Something similar could work outside the classroom too.</p>
<p><strong>Put the "clone freely while you're learning" advice somewhere official.</strong> Every experienced developer we spoke with gave the same advice, but learners seem to mostly pick it up by accident, like the researcher who happened to see someone else cloning the struct they had been carefully threading lifetimes through. Saying it early in official materials would take some of the steepness out of the curve. The broader version belongs there too: idiomatic Rust doesn't have to mean optimal Rust, especially on a first project.</p>
<p><strong>Diagnostics are already a primary learning resource: several people told us the compiler taught them lifetimes before any documentation did.</strong> Diagnostics reach learners right at the moment they're stuck. When writing new ones, it seems worth keeping the confused newcomer in mind alongside the expert, because for a lot of people this is where the learning happens.</p>
<p><strong>Is "the book" actually out of date?</strong> Whether or not The Rust Programming Language or other materials are actually behind, a team evaluating Rust looked at its repository, saw unresolved issues and unmerged PRs, and moved on. As more companies evaluate adoption, more people will look at these materials with the same fresh eyes. Visible issue triage and some communication about what's current and what's planned would address the perception, separately from whatever content work may or may not be needed.</p>
<p><strong>How stuck learners get treated is shaping who stays.</strong> We heard about students getting answers on GitHub from the maintainers who wrote the code, and we heard about learners being told their struggles were a skill issue. The first group came away with a lasting good impression of Rust. Some of the second group walked away entirely, and because they leave quietly, it's easy to underestimate how many of them there are. The welcoming side of the community came up unprompted as a reason people stayed, so we know it makes a difference when we get this right.</p>
<p><strong>Every organization we spoke with described essentially the same ramp-up for bringing a team to Rust.</strong> Teams that brought groups of developers to Rust described roughly the same approach: get everyone to a shared baseline with a training course or with The Rust Programming Language and Rustlings, start people on lower-risk tickets, and give them somewhere internal to ask questions. Several organizations also found that hiring developers without Rust experience and ramping them up worked out better than continuing to search for rare expertise in another language. None of this is complicated, and teams weighing adoption don't need to invent a training program from scratch.</p>
<h4><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#what-we-still-don-t-know"></a>
What we still don't know</h4>
<p>The biggest gap is the people we didn't reach. Nearly everyone we spoke with stuck with Rust long enough to be reachable through Rust channels, so the stories of bouncing off came to us second-hand: a friend who walked away from embedded Rust, colleagues who quietly stopped after the responses they got. As we wrote in <a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2025/12/03/lessons-learned-from-the-rust-vision-doc-process/" rel="external">our first post</a>, finding people who decided against Rust takes targeted outreach. If the proposed User Research team comes together, talking with learners who bounced would make a good early project, and learning is probably the area where that research would teach us the most.</p>
<p>We also don't know what to make of LLMs as a learning tool yet. They came up as a search engine, as an example generator, and in one organization's case as something that makes training high school graduates into working Rust developers possible. We saw a classroom where the C cohort leaned on LLMs in ways the Rust cohort couldn't, and we don't have an explanation for it. All of this comes from a handful of conversations, so we treat it as a set of leads to follow up on. Given how quickly the tools are changing, it seems better to study this deliberately than to wait and see what folklore develops.</p>
<p>The folks we spoke with showed that people do get there: with enough passes through the materials and enough code written, it eventually clicks. The opportunities above are mostly about making it work for the people who didn't pick Rust on purpose, and for the ones who would have stuck around if their early experience had gone a little differently.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[DLSS 5 (and the Backlash) Explained]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: Techquickie - Bewertung: 7229x - Views:172802 Thanks to Micro Center for sponsoring this video! Shop Micro Center's Laptop Savings Event: https://micro.center/a00204

Sign up for a FREE 128 gig Flash Drive at Micro Center Austin, TX: https://micro.center/74ccbf
Sign up for a FREE 128 gig ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693255/videos/dlss-5-and-the-backlash-explained/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693255/videos/dlss-5-and-the-backlash-explained/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:36:26 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Videos</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: Techquickie - Bewertung: 7229x - Views:172802 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/bMPgRlgcJcE?autoplay=1&origin=https://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p>Thanks to Micro Center for sponsoring this video! Shop Micro Center&#039;s Laptop Savings Event: https://micro.center/a00204<br />
<br />
Sign up for a FREE 128 gig Flash Drive at Micro Center Austin, TX: https://micro.center/74ccbf<br />
Sign up for a FREE 128 gig Flash Drive at Micro Center Columbus, OH: https://micro.center/4aed40<br />
Visit Micro Center News: https://micro.center/368232<br />
<br />
DLSS 5 is here, and it&#039;s not what you think. Nvidia&#039;s calling it the biggest graphics leap since Ray Tracing, but the same audience that defended DLSS for eight years is calling this one AI slop. So what&#039;s actually going on?<br />
<br />
In this video, we break down what DLSS 5 actually does, how neural rendering works, why Nvidia&#039;s CEO and Nvidia&#039;s own engineers are describing the tech differently, and whether the backlash from gamers and developers is justified.<br />
<br />
Leave a reply with your requests for future episodes.<br />
<br />
► SHOP OUR PRODUCTS: https://lttstore.com<br />
► GET A VPN: https://www.piavpn.com/TechQuickie<br />
► GET EXCLUSIVE CONTENT ON FLOATPLANE: https://lmg.gg/lttfloatplane<br />
► SPONSORS, AFFILIATES, AND PARTNERS: https://lmg.gg/partners<br />
<br />
Chapters <br />
------------------------<br />
00:0 DLSS backstory <br />
1:20 DLSS 5 explained <br />
2:20 Why gamers are confused<br />
2:40 Sponsor <br />
3:14 DLSS 5 unmasked <br />
4:30 Why gamers are mad <br />
6:00 Watch another video<br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Bluesky, Mastodon, W Social, Threads: 4 Alternativen zu X im Vergleich]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag Bluesky, Mastodon, W Social, Threads: 4 Alternativen zu X im Vergleich erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Immer mehr Nutzer kehren X (ehemals Twitter) den Rücken. Gleichzeitig wächs...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693167/it-nachrichten/bluesky-mastodon-w-social-threads-4-alternativen-zu-x-im-vergleich/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693167/it-nachrichten/bluesky-mastodon-w-social-threads-4-alternativen-zu-x-im-vergleich/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:00:46 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/06/02/x-alternativen-im-vergleich/">Bluesky, Mastodon, W Social, Threads: 4 Alternativen zu X im Vergleich</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Immer mehr Nutzer kehren X (ehemals Twitter) den Rücken. Gleichzeitig wächst die Zahl der Alternativen. Neben Bluesky, Mastodon und Threads drängt mit W Social seit 2026 ein europäisches Netzwerk auf den Markt, während die Initiative Eurosky eine eigene Infrastruktur für digitale Identitäten aufbaut. Doch wie unterscheiden sich die Angebote in Sachen Datenschutz, Reichweite und Nutzererlebnis? […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/06/02/x-alternativen-im-vergleich/">Bluesky, Mastodon, W Social, Threads: 4 Alternativen zu X im Vergleich</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Privat mit KI chatten: Inkognito-Chat mit Meta AI in WhatsApp starten]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag Privat mit KI chatten: Inkognito-Chat mit Meta AI in WhatsApp starten erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
WhatsApp erweitert seinen KI-Assistenten Meta AI um einen Inkognito-Modus. D...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693166/it-nachrichten/privat-mit-ki-chatten-inkognito-chat-mit-meta-ai-in-whatsapp-starten/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693166/it-nachrichten/privat-mit-ki-chatten-inkognito-chat-mit-meta-ai-in-whatsapp-starten/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 07:59:29 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/06/06/inkognito-chat-meta-ai-whatsapp/">Privat mit KI chatten: Inkognito-Chat mit Meta AI in WhatsApp starten</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>WhatsApp erweitert seinen KI-Assistenten Meta AI um einen Inkognito-Modus. Damit können Nutzer künftig private Chats mit der KI führen, die nach dem Verlassen automatisch gelöscht werden. Wir erklären, wie du den neuen Modus aktivierst, was dabei mit deinen Daten passiert und wann die Funktion verfügbar ist.  Künstliche Intelligenz hat sich in den vergangenen Jahren rasant […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/06/06/inkognito-chat-meta-ai-whatsapp/">Privat mit KI chatten: Inkognito-Chat mit Meta AI in WhatsApp starten</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[WhatsApp: So kannst du zwei Accounts gleichzeitig auf dem iPhone nutzen]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag WhatsApp: So kannst du zwei Accounts gleichzeitig auf dem iPhone nutzen erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
WhatsApp ermöglicht es jetzt auch auf dem iPhone, zwei Accounts gleichzeit...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693164/it-nachrichten/whatsapp-so-kannst-du-zwei-accounts-gleichzeitig-auf-dem-iphone-nutzen/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693164/it-nachrichten/whatsapp-so-kannst-du-zwei-accounts-gleichzeitig-auf-dem-iphone-nutzen/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 07:56:48 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/06/14/whatsapp-zwei-accounts-nutzen-iphone/">WhatsApp: So kannst du zwei Accounts gleichzeitig auf dem iPhone nutzen</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>WhatsApp ermöglicht es jetzt auch auf dem iPhone, zwei Accounts gleichzeitig auf einem Gerät zu nutzen. Damit lassen sich etwa private und berufliche Chats bequem trennen, ohne ständig Konten wechseln oder eine zweite App verwenden zu müssen. Wir zeigen dir, wie die Einrichtung funktioniert. Android-Nutzer haben bereits seit 2023 die Möglichkeit, zwei WhatsApp-Konten gleichzeitig auf […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/06/14/whatsapp-zwei-accounts-nutzen-iphone/">WhatsApp: So kannst du zwei Accounts gleichzeitig auf dem iPhone nutzen</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Muse Image: Instagram-Bilder mit neuer Meta-KI bearbeiten]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag Muse Image: Instagram-Bilder mit neuer Meta-KI bearbeiten erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Facebook-Konzern Meta hat mit Muse Image einen eigenen KI-Bildgenerator vorgestellt. Die...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693156/it-nachrichten/muse-image-instagram-bilder-mit-neuer-meta-ki-bearbeiten/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693156/it-nachrichten/muse-image-instagram-bilder-mit-neuer-meta-ki-bearbeiten/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 07:37:33 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/11/muse-image-ki-instagram/">Muse Image: Instagram-Bilder mit neuer Meta-KI bearbeiten</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Facebook-Konzern Meta hat mit Muse Image einen eigenen KI-Bildgenerator vorgestellt. Die Software kann nicht nur Bilder erzeugen und bearbeiten, sondern auch auf öffentliche Instagram-Inhalte zugreifen. UPDATE (13. Juli 2026): Meta hat seine KI-Funktion Muse Image nach massiver Kritiker wieder offline genommen. Das Unternehmen teilte laut der Nachrichtenagentur Reuters mit: „Wir haben Rückmeldungen erhalten, dass diese […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/11/muse-image-ki-instagram/">Muse Image: Instagram-Bilder mit neuer Meta-KI bearbeiten</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The UK’s first TikTok PM? Andy Burnham channels Zohran Mamdani as he hits social media]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[From Mo Farah to Bus Aunty, new prime minister makes good on promise to ‘do things differently’ when it comes to communicationThey say a week is a long time in politics, but handily for followers of Andy Burnham on social media, you can get daily updates of what the new PM has been up to on his t...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693153/it-nachrichten/the-uks-first-tiktok-pm-andy-burnham-channels-zohran-mamdani-as-he-hits-social-media/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693153/it-nachrichten/the-uks-first-tiktok-pm-andy-burnham-channels-zohran-mamdani-as-he-hits-social-media/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 07:27:59 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Mo Farah to Bus Aunty, new prime minister makes good on promise to ‘do things differently’ when it comes to communication</p><p>They say a week is a long time in politics, but handily for followers of Andy Burnham on social media, you can get daily updates of what the new PM has been up to on his timeline.</p><p>Before Burnham stepped inside No 10 this week he promised to “do things differently” in British politics. If his feed is anything to go by, he’s already way ahead of his predecessor.</p> <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/jul/25/tiktok-andy-burnham-zohran-mamdani-social-media">Continue reading...</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Das sind die größten Städte der Welt – wo warst du schon?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag Das sind die größten Städte der Welt – wo warst du schon? erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Nie zuvor lebten so viele Menschen in Städten wie heute, und die meisten der größten Met...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693151/it-nachrichten/das-sind-die-groessten-staedte-der-welt-wo-warst-du-schon/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693151/it-nachrichten/das-sind-die-groessten-staedte-der-welt-wo-warst-du-schon/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 07:26:47 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/17/groessten-staedte-der-welt-2/">Das sind die größten Städte der Welt – wo warst du schon?</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Nie zuvor lebten so viele Menschen in Städten wie heute, und die meisten der größten Metropolen der Welt wachsen weiter. Europa ist längst abgehängt, dafür dominiert ein anderer Kontinent das Ranking. Wir verraten in diesem Artikel die zehn bevölkerungsreichsten Städte der Welt. Die Landflucht ist nicht nur in Deutschland real. Auf der ganzen Welt leben […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/17/groessten-staedte-der-welt-2/">Das sind die größten Städte der Welt – wo warst du schon?</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Das sind die besten Internetanbieter in Deutschland]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag Das sind die besten Internetanbieter in Deutschland erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Viele Verträge schließen wir nebenbei ab und vergessen dann, dass sie überhaupt existieren. Da...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693149/it-nachrichten/das-sind-die-besten-internetanbieter-in-deutschland/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693149/it-nachrichten/das-sind-die-besten-internetanbieter-in-deutschland/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 07:22:21 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/20/besten-internetanbieter-in-deutschland/">Das sind die besten Internetanbieter in Deutschland</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Viele Verträge schließen wir nebenbei ab und vergessen dann, dass sie überhaupt existieren. Das trifft vor allem auf Internetanbieter zu, die von vielen Menschen nie gewechselt werden. Dabei lohnt sich ein genauer Blick, denn zwischen den Unternehmen gibt es große Unterschiede. Streaming, Homeoffice, Videocalls oder Online-Shopping: Ohne stabile Internetleitung steht das Leben häufig still. Der […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/20/besten-internetanbieter-in-deutschland/">Das sind die besten Internetanbieter in Deutschland</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Studie belegt: Solaranlagen fallen bei Extremhitze fast komplett aus]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag Studie belegt: Solaranlagen fallen bei Extremhitze fast komplett aus erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Der Klimawandel gefährdet zunehmend die europäische Stromversorgung, da extre...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693148/it-nachrichten/studie-belegt-solaranlagen-fallen-bei-extremhitze-fast-komplett-aus/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693148/it-nachrichten/studie-belegt-solaranlagen-fallen-bei-extremhitze-fast-komplett-aus/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 07:21:36 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/21/solaranlagen-bei-hitze/">Studie belegt: Solaranlagen fallen bei Extremhitze fast komplett aus</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Der Klimawandel gefährdet zunehmend die europäische Stromversorgung, da extreme Sommertemperaturen nachhaltige Infrastruktur belasten. Eine neue wissenschaftliche Untersuchung zeigt, dass Solaranlagen bei Hitze massive Leistungseinbrüche von bis zu 90 Prozent erleiden können.  Ein Forscherteam der Universität Évora in Portugal hat die Auswirkungen extremer Hitzephasen auf Solaranlagen auf der Iberischen Halbinsel in den Jahren 2024 und 2025 […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/21/solaranlagen-bei-hitze/">Studie belegt: Solaranlagen fallen bei Extremhitze fast komplett aus</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Kartenzahlung im Café, Foodtruck & Bistro: Welche Lösung lohnt sich wirklich?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag Kartenzahlung im Café, Foodtruck & Bistro: Welche Lösung lohnt sich wirklich? erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Wer heute ein Café, einen Foodtruck oder ein kleines Bistro betreibt...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693139/it-nachrichten/kartenzahlung-im-caf-foodtruck-bistro-welche-loesung-lohnt-sich-wirklich/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693139/it-nachrichten/kartenzahlung-im-caf-foodtruck-bistro-welche-loesung-lohnt-sich-wirklich/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 07:08:54 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/22/kartenzahlung-im-cafe-foodtruck-bistro-welche-loesung-lohnt-sich-wirklich/">Kartenzahlung im Café, Foodtruck &amp; Bistro: Welche Lösung lohnt sich wirklich?</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Wer heute ein Café, einen Foodtruck oder ein kleines Bistro betreibt, kommt an einer Sache kaum noch vorbei: bargeldloses Bezahlen. Gäste erwarten es, Umsätze hängen davon ab und wer kein Kartenlesegerät anbietet, riskiert im schlimmsten Fall, dass der Tisch leer bleibt. Doch welche Zahlungslösung passt wirklich zu kleinen Gastronomiebetrieben? Und worauf sollten Inhaber achten, bevor […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/22/kartenzahlung-im-cafe-foodtruck-bistro-welche-loesung-lohnt-sich-wirklich/">Kartenzahlung im Café, Foodtruck &amp; Bistro: Welche Lösung lohnt sich wirklich?</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Diese Länder haben die besten Gesundheitssysteme]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag Diese Länder haben die besten Gesundheitssysteme erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Nicht großartig darüber nachdenken zu müssen, wie das Gesundheitssystem funktioniert, ist ein Lux...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693137/it-nachrichten/diese-laender-haben-die-besten-gesundheitssysteme/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693137/it-nachrichten/diese-laender-haben-die-besten-gesundheitssysteme/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 07:05:03 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/22/laender-beste-gesundheitssystem/">Diese Länder haben die besten Gesundheitssysteme</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Nicht großartig darüber nachdenken zu müssen, wie das Gesundheitssystem funktioniert, ist ein Luxus, den viele Menschen in Deutschland genießen. Dabei entscheidet die medizinische Infrastruktur im Ernstfall über Leben und Tod. Wir verraten in unserem Ranking, welche zehn Länder im Vergleich am besten abschneiden, und wo Deutschland landet. Die medizinische Versorgung sagt sehr viel über den […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/22/laender-beste-gesundheitssystem/">Diese Länder haben die besten Gesundheitssysteme</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Drei Anbieter, zwei Systeme, kein Überblick: Das ist der bAV-Alltag im Mittelstand]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag Drei Anbieter, zwei Systeme, kein Überblick: Das ist der bAV-Alltag im Mittelstand erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Drei Anbieter, zwei Systeme, ein Ordner voller Altverträge und ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693121/it-nachrichten/drei-anbieter-zwei-systeme-kein-ueberblick-das-ist-der-bav-alltag-im-mittelstand/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693121/it-nachrichten/drei-anbieter-zwei-systeme-kein-ueberblick-das-ist-der-bav-alltag-im-mittelstand/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 06:59:05 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/23/drei-anbieter-zwei-systeme-kein-ueberblick-das-ist-der-bav-alltag-im-mittelstand/">Drei Anbieter, zwei Systeme, kein Überblick: Das ist der bAV-Alltag im Mittelstand</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Drei Anbieter, zwei Systeme, ein Ordner voller Altverträge und niemand im Unternehmen, der noch weiß, was eigentlich wo gilt. Betriebliche Altersvorsorge im Mittelstand sieht in der Praxis selten so aus wie in der Theorie. Sie ist gewachsen, nicht geplant. Und genau das wird zum Problem, für HR, für den CFO und für jeden Mitarbeitenden, der […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/23/drei-anbieter-zwei-systeme-kein-ueberblick-das-ist-der-bav-alltag-im-mittelstand/">Drei Anbieter, zwei Systeme, kein Überblick: Das ist der bAV-Alltag im Mittelstand</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Wenn der Außendienst zur Schaltzentrale wird: Warum Field Service Management jetzt Chefsache ist]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag Wenn der Außendienst zur Schaltzentrale wird: Warum Field Service Management jetzt Chefsache ist erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Ob Energiewende, Glasfaserausbau oder störungsfre...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693110/it-nachrichten/wenn-der-aussendienst-zur-schaltzentrale-wird-warum-field-service-management-jetzt-chefsache-ist/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693110/it-nachrichten/wenn-der-aussendienst-zur-schaltzentrale-wird-warum-field-service-management-jetzt-chefsache-ist/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 06:45:18 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/23/field-service-management/">Wenn der Außendienst zur Schaltzentrale wird: Warum Field Service Management jetzt Chefsache ist</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Ob Energiewende, Glasfaserausbau oder störungsfreie Mobilität: Wenn draußen etwas passiert, entscheidet der Field Service über Qualität, Sicherheit und Kosten. Moderne Field Service Management Software verknüpft Disposition, Assets, Geodaten und mobile Teams so, dass Einsätze planbar, nachweisbar und deutlich effizienter werden. Außendienst klingt nach „Techniker fährt raus, repariert, fährt wieder zurück“. In der Realität ist Field […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/23/field-service-management/">Wenn der Außendienst zur Schaltzentrale wird: Warum Field Service Management jetzt Chefsache ist</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Deutsche Forscher bauen sprechende Batterie für Elektroautos]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag Deutsche Forscher bauen sprechende Batterie für Elektroautos erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Ein neues Prinzip könnte Batteriemanagementsysteme in Elektroautos oder Heimspeichern...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693102/it-nachrichten/deutsche-forscher-bauen-sprechende-batterie-fuer-elektroautos/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693102/it-nachrichten/deutsche-forscher-bauen-sprechende-batterie-fuer-elektroautos/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 06:35:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/23/sprechende-batterie-elektroautos/">Deutsche Forscher bauen sprechende Batterie für Elektroautos</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Ein neues Prinzip könnte Batteriemanagementsysteme in Elektroautos oder Heimspeichern künftig kostengünstiger und sicherer machen. Denn deutsche Forscher haben eine sprechende Batterie entwickelt, die ihren Zustand aus ihrem Inneren heraus übermitteln soll.  Bislang messen Sensoren die Temperatur von Batteriezellen meist nur an der Außenseite, obwohl Hitze oft zuerst im Inneren entsteht. Ein Forscherteam der Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/23/sprechende-batterie-elektroautos/">Deutsche Forscher bauen sprechende Batterie für Elektroautos</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Podcast: Warum Google-Rezensionen immer schlechter werden]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag Podcast: Warum Google-Rezensionen immer schlechter werden erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
BREAK/THE WEEK ist dein wöchentlicher Tech-Talk von BASIC thinking, der dich hinter die ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693092/it-nachrichten/podcast-warum-google-rezensionen-immer-schlechter-werden/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693092/it-nachrichten/podcast-warum-google-rezensionen-immer-schlechter-werden/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 06:24:40 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/24/btw-012/">Podcast: Warum Google-Rezensionen immer schlechter werden</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>BREAK/THE WEEK ist dein wöchentlicher Tech-Talk von BASIC thinking, der dich hinter die Kulissen der Tech-Welt nimmt. In dieser Ausgabe diskutieren wir über eine Kilometersteuer für E-Autos in Großbritannien, die Quellen von KI-Chatbots und einen Krieg der Sterne bei Google-Rezensionen. Die Themen dieser Ausgabe: Neue Lasertechnik erkennt Methanol in verschlossenen Flaschen EU wechselt Strategie im […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/24/btw-012/">Podcast: Warum Google-Rezensionen immer schlechter werden</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[So erklärst du deinen Mitarbeitenden die bAV – ohne dass HR jede Frage selbst beantworten muss]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag So erklärst du deinen Mitarbeitenden die bAV – ohne dass HR jede Frage selbst beantworten muss erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Die betriebliche Altersvorsorge gehört zu den wertv...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693089/it-nachrichten/so-erklaerst-du-deinen-mitarbeitenden-die-bav-ohne-dass-hr-jede-frage-selbst-beantworten-muss/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693089/it-nachrichten/so-erklaerst-du-deinen-mitarbeitenden-die-bav-ohne-dass-hr-jede-frage-selbst-beantworten-muss/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 06:23:16 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/24/so-erklaerst-du-deinen-mitarbeitenden-die-bav/">So erklärst du deinen Mitarbeitenden die bAV – ohne dass HR jede Frage selbst beantworten muss</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Die betriebliche Altersvorsorge gehört zu den wertvollsten Benefits, die ein Arbeitgeber anbieten kann und gleichzeitig zu den am schlechtesten kommunizierten. Viele HR-Teams kennen das Problem: Die bAV ist eingeführt, der Vertrag mit dem Versicherer steht, die Versorgungsordnung liegt im Ordner. Aber die Mitarbeitenden? Die fragen immer noch, was das eigentlich bedeutet, ob sie mitmachen sollen […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/24/so-erklaerst-du-deinen-mitarbeitenden-die-bav/">So erklärst du deinen Mitarbeitenden die bAV – ohne dass HR jede Frage selbst beantworten muss</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[What is a business analyst? A key role for business-IT efficiency]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[What is a business analyst?



Business analysts (BAs) are responsible for bridging the gap between IT and the business using data analytics to assess processes, determine requirements, and deliver data-driven recommendations and reports to executives and stakeholders.



BAs engage with business...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693087/it-nachrichten/what-is-a-business-analyst-a-key-role-for-business-it-efficiency/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693087/it-nachrichten/what-is-a-business-analyst-a-key-role-for-business-it-efficiency/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 06:16:45 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What is a business analyst?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Business analysts (BAs) are responsible for bridging the gap between IT and the business using <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/191313/what-is-data-analytics-analyzing-and-managing-data-for-decisions.html">data analytics</a> to assess processes, determine requirements, and deliver data-driven recommendations and reports to executives and stakeholders.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">BAs engage with business leaders and users to understand how data-driven changes to process, products, services, software, and hardware can improve efficiencies and add value. They must articulate those ideas but also balance them against what’s technologically feasible and financially and functionally reasonable. Depending on the role, a business analyst might work with data sets to improve products, hardware, tools, software, services, or process.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The International Institute of Business Analysis (IIBA), a nonprofit professional association, considers the business analyst an agent of change, and says that <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/191157/what-is-business-analytics-using-data-to-predict-business-outcomes.html">business analysis</a> is a disciplined approach to introduce and manage change to organizations, whether they’re for-profit businesses, governments, or nonprofits.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Impact of AI on business analyst role</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As AI becomes commonplace in the tech industry, business analysts are embracing it as a tool to automate repetitive work in the role. AI tools can be used for workflow and diagramming, process mapping, data analysis, and to automate meeting minutes and transcribe meetings where requirements are established, all designed to speed up the process of analyzing data, creating visuals, and transcribing and writing user stories and acceptance criteria.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI tools can also help identify patterns, insights, and unique data points that might go unnoticed by humans, and allow a faster time to generate insights for organizations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Of course, as with all AI tools, they still require humans to oversee prompts, scripting, and evaluate AI outputs to ensure they’re accurate and valid. While they can’t replace the work of BAs, AI can help them spend more time on thoughtful analysis and decision making, rather than mundane tasks such as gathering and summarizing data, and querying.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Business analyst job description</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">BAs are responsible for creating new models that support business decisions by working closely with finance and IT teams to establish initiatives and strategies aimed at improving revenue and optimizing costs. They need a strong understanding of regulatory and reporting requirements, and have plenty of experience in forecasting, budgeting, and financial analysis combined with knowing KPIs, according to Robert Half Technology.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to Robert Half, a BA’s job description typically includes budgeting and forecasting, planning and monitoring, variance analysis, pricing, reporting, and creating a detailed business analysis in an effort to outline problems, opportunities, and solutions for a business. It also says BAs should be able to define business requirements and report them back to stakeholders.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Since BAs are tasked with prioritizing technical and functional requirements, identifying what clients want, and determining what’s feasible to deliver, the role requires a deep understanding of systems, how they function, who’ll need to be involved, and the necessary steps to get everyone on board.  </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The role is constantly evolving, especially as companies rely more on data to advise business operations. Every company has different issues that a business analyst can address, whether it’s dealing with outdated legacy systems, changing technologies, broken processes, poor client or customer satisfaction, or large, siloed organizations.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Business analyst skills</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The BA position requires both hard and soft skills, as they need to know how to pull, analyze, and report data trends, share that information with others, and apply it to business goals and needs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Not all BAs need a background in IT if they have a general understanding of how systems, products, and tools work. Alternatively, some have strong IT backgrounds and less experience in business, but are interested in shifting away from IT into this hybrid role, which often acts as a communicator between the business and IT sides of the organization. So having extensive experience in either area can be beneficial for BAs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.iiba.org/career-resources/new-to-business-analysis/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">According to the IIBA</a>, some of the most important skills and experience for a business analyst are:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Oral and written communication skills</li>



<li>Interpersonal, organizational, facilitation, and consultative skills</li>



<li>Analytical thinking and problem solving</li>



<li>Being detail-oriented and able to deliver a high level of accuracy</li>



<li>Knowledge of business structure</li>



<li>Stakeholder and cost-benefit analysis</li>



<li>Processes modeling</li>



<li>Understanding networks, databases, and other technologies</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For a more in-depth look at what it takes to succeed as a business analyst, click <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/189108/essential-traits-of-elite-business-analysts.html">here</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Business analyst salary</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The average annual salary for an IT business analyst is $80,692, according to <a href="https://www.payscale.com/research/US/Job=Business_Analyst%2C_IT/Salary" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">data from PayScale</a>. The highest paid BAs are in New York, where the average salary is 14% higher than the national average. Dallas, Texas, is second, with reported salaries 6.4% higher than the national average, closely followed by Washington, D.C., where salaries are 6.3% higher than the national average.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Some skills are in higher demand than others, with the potential to boost salary. According to Payscale, these are associated with higher BA salaries. These skills, and the amount they can boost your salary, include:</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><div class="overflow-table-wrapper"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><tbody><tr><td>Skills</td><td>Salary Boost</td></tr><tr><td>ScrumMaster</td><td>44%</td></tr><tr><td>Microsoft Azure</td><td>30%</td></tr><tr><td>Supply Chain</td><td>27%</td></tr><tr><td>Oracle eBusiness Suite</td><td>25%</td></tr><tr><td>Master Data Management (SAP MDM)</td><td>24%</td></tr><tr><td>SAP Sales and Distribution (SAP SD)</td><td>24%</td></tr><tr><td>Product Support</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>Microsoft Dynamics GP</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>SAP Quality Management (SAP QM)</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>Workday Software</td><td>15%</td></tr></tbody></table> </div></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For tips on boosting your salary, click <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/189510/7-steps-business-analysts-can-take-to-earn-more.html">here</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Business analyst certifications</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Although business analysis is a relatively new discipline in IT, a handful of organizations already offer certifications to help boost your résumé and prove your merit as an analyst. Organizations such as the IIBA, IQBBA, IREB, and PMI each offer their own tailored certifications for business analysis. These include:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>IIBA <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/189169/ecba-certification-an-entry-level-credential-for-business-analysts.html">Entry Certificate in Business Analysis (ECBA)</a></li>



<li>IIBA Certification of Competency in Business Analysis (CCBA)</li>



<li>IIBA Certified Business Analysis Professional (CBAP)</li>



<li>IIBA Agile Analysis Certification (AAC)</li>



<li>IQBBA Certified Foundation Level Business Analyst (CFLBA)</li>



<li>IREB Certified Professional for Requirements Engineering (CPRE)</li>



<li>PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PBA)</li>



<li>Certified Analytics Professional (CAP)</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For more information about how to earn one of these certifications — and how much they cost — click <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/228834/6-business-analyst-certifications-to-advance-your-analytics-career.html">here</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Business analytics tools and software</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">BAs typically rely on software such as Microsoft’s Excel, PowerPoint, and Access, as well as SQL, Google Analytics, and Tableau. These tools help BAs collect and sort data, create graphs, write documents, and design visualizations to explain findings. You won’t necessarily need programming or database skills for a BA position, but if you already have these skills, they won’t hurt. The type of software and tools you’ll need to use, however, will depend on your job title and what the organization requires.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Claude Cowork kann dich beim arbeiten beobachten – um deinen Job zu erledigen]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag Claude Cowork kann dich beim arbeiten beobachten – um deinen Job zu erledigen erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Anthropic hat eine neue Funktion für Claude Cowork vorgestellt: Reco...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693070/it-nachrichten/claude-cowork-kann-dich-beim-arbeiten-beobachten-um-deinen-job-zu-erledigen/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693070/it-nachrichten/claude-cowork-kann-dich-beim-arbeiten-beobachten-um-deinen-job-zu-erledigen/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 05:58:40 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/25/claude-cowork-skill-aufzeichnen/">Claude Cowork kann dich beim arbeiten beobachten – um deinen Job zu erledigen</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Anthropic hat eine neue Funktion für Claude Cowork vorgestellt: Record a Skill, zu Deutsch: einen Skill aufzeichnen. Nutzer können sich dabei selbst beim Arbeiten aufzeichnen. Claude lernt dann daraus eine wiederholbare Fähigkeit, um Aufgaben für dich zu erledigen. Die Reaktionen reichen von Begeisterung bis zu Jobsorgen.  So schnell wie KI-Anwendungen neue Funktionen bekommen, können Nutzer […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/25/claude-cowork-skill-aufzeichnen/">Claude Cowork kann dich beim arbeiten beobachten – um deinen Job zu erledigen</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Diese Elektroautos haben die langlebigsten Batterien]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag Diese Elektroautos haben die langlebigsten Batterien erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Die Qualität von E-Autos steht und fällt mit dem Akku. Die Batterie ist das Herzstück jedes E...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693063/it-nachrichten/diese-elektroautos-haben-die-langlebigsten-batterien/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693063/it-nachrichten/diese-elektroautos-haben-die-langlebigsten-batterien/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 05:49:20 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/24/elektroautos-mit-den-langlebigsten-batterien/">Diese Elektroautos haben die langlebigsten Batterien</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Die Qualität von E-Autos steht und fällt mit dem Akku. Die Batterie ist das Herzstück jedes Elektroautos, und die Sorge vor dem Verschleiß hält viele Menschen vom Kauf ab. Deshalb klären wir in diesem Artikel, welche Modelle auch nach vielen gefahrenen Kilometern noch Leistung bringen. Beim Kauf eines Benziners spielt sie meistens keine große Rolle, […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/24/elektroautos-mit-den-langlebigsten-batterien/">Diese Elektroautos haben die langlebigsten Batterien</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[v1.18.5]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Core
Bugfixes

Improve Claude adaptive thinking handling across more response shapes.
Avoid OpenAI Responses phase handling that could break some conversations.
Preserve grep symlink paths in search results. (@remixz)
Preserve Mistral reasoning history across turns.
Stabilize Mistral prompt cachi...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692688/downloads/v1185/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692688/downloads/v1185/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 00:31:21 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾 Downloads</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>Core</h2>
<h3>Bugfixes</h3>
<ul>
<li>Improve Claude adaptive thinking handling across more response shapes.</li>
<li>Avoid OpenAI Responses phase handling that could break some conversations.</li>
<li>Preserve grep symlink paths in search results. (<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/remixz/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/remixz">@remixz</a>)</li>
<li>Preserve Mistral reasoning history across turns.</li>
<li>Stabilize Mistral prompt caching.</li>
<li>Use the correct prompt cache keys for each SDK.</li>
<li>Fix MiniMax M3 thinking variant selection.</li>
</ul>
<h2>Desktop</h2>
<h3>Improvements</h3>
<ul>
<li>Support the current server terminal transport.</li>
<li>Support current-server review data in the desktop app.</li>
<li>Update server discovery flows for current servers.</li>
<li>Support current-server session actions, including prompts and commands.</li>
<li>Render current-server session timelines.</li>
<li>Stream current-server events in the desktop app.</li>
<li>Detect legacy and current servers so the desktop app can work with both.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Bugfixes</h3>
<ul>
<li>Restore optimistic timeline updates while responses are still streaming.</li>
<li>Hide legacy-only features when connected to current servers.</li>
<li>Preserve inline file mentions when sending prompts to legacy servers.</li>
<li>Stop auto-accepting config permissions on current servers.</li>
<li>Keep current servers out of the legacy layout.</li>
<li>Show plain file contents in file-specific tabs instead of review diffs.</li>
<li>Keep the prompt input agent toggle in sync.</li>
<li>Keep paginated session timelines in the right order.</li>
<li>Restore directory-scoped session status for legacy servers.</li>
<li>Reload legacy session progress after hydration.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Thank you to 2 community contributors:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/dleopold/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/dleopold">@dleopold</a>:
<ul>
<li>fix(app): classify existing web profiles for layout transition (<a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4939847181" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/issues/38117" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/anomalyco/opencode/pull/38117/hovercard" href="https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/pull/38117">#38117</a>)</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/remixz/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/remixz">@remixz</a>:
<ul>
<li>fix(opencode): preserve grep symlink paths (<a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4963907154" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/issues/38581" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/anomalyco/opencode/pull/38581/hovercard" href="https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/pull/38581">#38581</a>)</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Is exFAT feasible for internal ssd long term ?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Dual booting win/linux for a while now (dedicated ssd per OS). And I need some shared storage so I've been using ntfs for 2 storage ssd's but it's been a huge headache as the linux/win combination constantly corrupts the ntfs file system and I end up with a ton of issues on linux, always having t...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692666/linux-tipps/is-exfat-feasible-for-internal-ssd-long-term/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692666/linux-tipps/is-exfat-feasible-for-internal-ssd-long-term/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 00:11:38 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Linux Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Dual booting win/linux for a while now (dedicated ssd per OS). And I need some shared storage so I've been using ntfs for 2 storage ssd's but it's been a huge headache as the linux/win combination constantly corrupts the ntfs file system and I end up with a ton of issues on linux, always having to repair it in windows. </p> <p>I already do full shutdowns on windows (even started disconnecting the drives from the windows partition manager before shutdown), it doesn't seem to help (i'm suspecting that linux itself corrupts the file system sometimes). </p> <p>So I'm thinking of switching to using exfat but I've not been able to find much on how feasible that is to use on internal drives. Anyone have any experience with this ? </p> <p>Of note - the data is not that critical as to warrant a high degree of reliability, but at the same time if exfat presents known issues, same or worse as ntfs, it doesn't make sense to switch.</p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/kepler2"> /u/kepler2 </a> <br> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1v5dpw3/is_exfat_feasible_for_internal_ssd_long_term/">[link]</a></span>   <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1v5dpw3/is_exfat_feasible_for_internal_ssd_long_term/">[comments]</a></span>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Diese Elektroautos haben die langlebigsten Batterien]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag Diese Elektroautos haben die langlebigsten Batterien erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Die Qualität von E-Autos steht und fällt mit dem Akku. Die Batterie ist das Herzstück jedes E...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692358/it-security-nachrichten/diese-elektroautos-haben-die-langlebigsten-batterien/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692358/it-security-nachrichten/diese-elektroautos-haben-die-langlebigsten-batterien/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 21:08:46 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/24/elektroautos-mit-den-langlebigsten-batterien/">Diese Elektroautos haben die langlebigsten Batterien</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Die Qualität von E-Autos steht und fällt mit dem Akku. Die Batterie ist das Herzstück jedes Elektroautos, und die Sorge vor dem Verschleiß hält viele Menschen vom Kauf ab. Deshalb klären wir in diesem Artikel, welche Modelle auch nach vielen gefahrenen Kilometern noch Leistung bringen. Beim Kauf eines Benziners spielt sie meistens keine große Rolle, […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/24/elektroautos-mit-den-langlebigsten-batterien/">Diese Elektroautos haben die langlebigsten Batterien</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Updated Cyber Threat Actor Naming System]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Introduction 
Today, Google Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG) will begin rolling out a unified naming schema for tracking threat actors. This new naming taxonomy represents an effort to standardize tracking across platforms and public reporting.
Why are we Adopting a Different Naming System?
Histo...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691731/it-security-nachrichten/updated-cyber-threat-actor-naming-system/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691731/it-security-nachrichten/updated-cyber-threat-actor-naming-system/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 16:04:12 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="block-paragraph_advanced"><h2><strong>Introduction </strong></h2>
<p><span>Today, Google Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG) will begin rolling out a unified naming schema for tracking threat actors. This new naming taxonomy represents an effort to standardize tracking across platforms and public reporting.</span></p>
<h2><strong>Why are we Adopting a Different Naming System?</strong></h2>
<p><span>Historically, Mandiant and Google’s Threat Analysis Group (TAG) maintained distinct tracking systems, relying on parallel naming schemas that grew independently over time. The creation of GTIG has necessitated a new, fused tracking system, and a new naming system. Thinking to the future, GTIG’s new system will rely on cryptonyms. Relying on sequential numbers or disparate identifiers (e.g. APT1) fails to provide defenders the critical context needed to operate quickly. Threat tracking shouldn’t be an exercise in memorization, but rather one of intuition. The new naming convention aligns with industry standard threat actor naming systems. </span></p>
<h2><strong>Our New Schema</strong></h2>
<p><span>Our new schema utilizes a cryptonym-based approach, employing memorable two-word combinations for each distinct threat actor:</span></p>
<ul>
<li aria-level="1">
<p role="presentation"><span>The </span><strong>first word</strong><span> is a unique and memorable term chosen to represent the specific actor, particularly names that may have been used in prior public reporting. If no previously used term exists, this word is randomly generated to remove bias, then vetted by our analysts.</span></p>
</li>
<li aria-level="1">
<p role="presentation"><span>The </span><strong>second word</strong><span> categorizes threat clusters by motivation, attribution, or activity type based on which category we consider to be most important for defense and response strategies.</span></p>
</li>
</ul>
<p><span>The table below provides a sample of how threat actor categories will map to the second word in each cryptonym:</span></p>
<div align="left">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div><table><colgroup><col><col></colgroup>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>Origin or Type</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><strong>Group Name</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><span>People’s Republic of China</span></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><span>CASTLE</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><span>Iran</span></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><span>ION</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><span>North Korea</span></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><span>NEPTUNE</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><span>Russia</span></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><span>RELIC</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><span>Cybercriminal</span></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><span>COMET</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p><span>Table 1: Examples of Google’s new threat actor naming system categories</span></p>
<p><span>We know there are many threat actor tracking schemas in the industry, so we are intentionally seeking to keep this system as simple as possible to streamline operations and facilitate mapping to other naming taxonomies. However, a significant caveat remains: because no two organizations have the exact same visibility into the threat landscape, direct, apples-to-apples comparisons between threat actors are rarely possible. Transitioning to a convention that is simpler to follow and remember is a practical step toward managing a highly intricate tracking problem. </span></p>
<h2><strong>A Work in Progress</strong></h2>
<p><span>We have initially prioritized renaming several dozen of the most active groups, and will continue this process on a rolling basis. Previous names will remain indexed and searchable in the Google Threat Intelligence (GTI) platform, with MITRE ATT&amp;CK mappings and other vendor aliases preserved, see Figure 1. </span></p></div>
<div class="block-image_full_width">






  
    <div class="article-module h-c-page">
      <div class="h-c-grid">
  

    <figure class="article-image--large
      
      
        h-c-grid__col
        h-c-grid__col--6 h-c-grid__col--offset-3
        
        
      ">

      
      
        
        <img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/gweb-cloudblog-publish/images/image_22.max-1000x1000.png" alt="Updated Cyber Threat Actor Naming System Image 1">
        
        
      
        <figcaption class="article-image__caption "><p data-block-key="5g4yd">Figure 1: Threat actor name appearance in GTI platform on initial rollout</p></figcaption>
      
    </figure>

  
      </div>
    </div>
  




</div>
<div class="block-paragraph_advanced"><p><span>We will continue to use UNC, or “uncategorized” designations for threat clusters that are still in the early stages of investigation, as described </span><a href="https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/threat-intelligence/how-mandiant-tracks-uncategorized-threat-actors"><span>here</span></a><span>.</span></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Auto-Software: Ford setzt auf natives Apple Maps bei neuer UEV-Plattform]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple und Ford bauen ihre Zusammenarbeit im Auto deutlich aus. Künftige Elektro­fahrzeuge auf Fords neuer Universal Electric Vehicle Platform (UEV) erhalten Apple Maps als fest integrierte Navigationslösung. Darüber hinaus sollen Kartendaten von Apple auch Fords nächste Generation des Assistenzsy...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691301/it-nachrichten/auto-software-ford-setzt-auf-natives-apple-maps-bei-neuer-uev-plattform/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691301/it-nachrichten/auto-software-ford-setzt-auf-natives-apple-maps-bei-neuer-uev-plattform/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 12:49:26 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://pics.computerbase.de/1/2/3/9/5/7-b08cfafbecc5db10/article-640x360.c9d6c93b.jpg"><p>Apple und Ford bauen ihre Zusammenarbeit im Auto deutlich aus. Künftige Elektro­fahrzeuge auf Fords neuer Universal Electric Vehicle Platform (UEV) erhalten Apple Maps als fest integrierte Navigationslösung. Darüber hinaus sollen Kartendaten von Apple auch Fords nächste Generation des Assistenzsystems BlueCruise unterstützen.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[What is a business analyst? A key role for business-IT efficiency]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[What is a business analyst?



Business analysts (BAs) are responsible for bridging the gap between IT and the business using data analytics to assess processes, determine requirements, and deliver data-driven recommendations and reports to executives and stakeholders.



BAs engage with business...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691228/it-security-nachrichten/what-is-a-business-analyst-a-key-role-for-business-it-efficiency/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691228/it-security-nachrichten/what-is-a-business-analyst-a-key-role-for-business-it-efficiency/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 12:09:04 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What is a business analyst?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Business analysts (BAs) are responsible for bridging the gap between IT and the business using <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/191313/what-is-data-analytics-analyzing-and-managing-data-for-decisions.html">data analytics</a> to assess processes, determine requirements, and deliver data-driven recommendations and reports to executives and stakeholders.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">BAs engage with business leaders and users to understand how data-driven changes to process, products, services, software, and hardware can improve efficiencies and add value. They must articulate those ideas but also balance them against what’s technologically feasible and financially and functionally reasonable. Depending on the role, a business analyst might work with data sets to improve products, hardware, tools, software, services, or process.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The International Institute of Business Analysis (IIBA), a nonprofit professional association, considers the business analyst an agent of change, and says that <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/191157/what-is-business-analytics-using-data-to-predict-business-outcomes.html">business analysis</a> is a disciplined approach to introduce and manage change to organizations, whether they’re for-profit businesses, governments, or nonprofits.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Impact of AI on business analyst role</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As AI becomes commonplace in the tech industry, business analysts are embracing it as a tool to automate repetitive work in the role. AI tools can be used for workflow and diagramming, process mapping, data analysis, and to automate meeting minutes and transcribe meetings where requirements are established, all designed to speed up the process of analyzing data, creating visuals, and transcribing and writing user stories and acceptance criteria.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI tools can also help identify patterns, insights, and unique data points that might go unnoticed by humans, and allow a faster time to generate insights for organizations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Of course, as with all AI tools, they still require humans to oversee prompts, scripting, and evaluate AI outputs to ensure they’re accurate and valid. While they can’t replace the work of BAs, AI can help them spend more time on thoughtful analysis and decision making, rather than mundane tasks such as gathering and summarizing data, and querying.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Business analyst job description</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">BAs are responsible for creating new models that support business decisions by working closely with finance and IT teams to establish initiatives and strategies aimed at improving revenue and optimizing costs. They need a strong understanding of regulatory and reporting requirements, and have plenty of experience in forecasting, budgeting, and financial analysis combined with knowing KPIs, according to Robert Half Technology.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to Robert Half, a BA’s job description typically includes budgeting and forecasting, planning and monitoring, variance analysis, pricing, reporting, and creating a detailed business analysis in an effort to outline problems, opportunities, and solutions for a business. It also says BAs should be able to define business requirements and report them back to stakeholders.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Since BAs are tasked with prioritizing technical and functional requirements, identifying what clients want, and determining what’s feasible to deliver, the role requires a deep understanding of systems, how they function, who’ll need to be involved, and the necessary steps to get everyone on board.  </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The role is constantly evolving, especially as companies rely more on data to advise business operations. Every company has different issues that a business analyst can address, whether it’s dealing with outdated legacy systems, changing technologies, broken processes, poor client or customer satisfaction, or large, siloed organizations.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Business analyst skills</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The BA position requires both hard and soft skills, as they need to know how to pull, analyze, and report data trends, share that information with others, and apply it to business goals and needs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Not all BAs need a background in IT if they have a general understanding of how systems, products, and tools work. Alternatively, some have strong IT backgrounds and less experience in business, but are interested in shifting away from IT into this hybrid role, which often acts as a communicator between the business and IT sides of the organization. So having extensive experience in either area can be beneficial for BAs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.iiba.org/career-resources/new-to-business-analysis/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">According to the IIBA</a>, some of the most important skills and experience for a business analyst are:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Oral and written communication skills</li>



<li>Interpersonal, organizational, facilitation, and consultative skills</li>



<li>Analytical thinking and problem solving</li>



<li>Being detail-oriented and able to deliver a high level of accuracy</li>



<li>Knowledge of business structure</li>



<li>Stakeholder and cost-benefit analysis</li>



<li>Processes modeling</li>



<li>Understanding networks, databases, and other technologies</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For a more in-depth look at what it takes to succeed as a business analyst, click <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/189108/essential-traits-of-elite-business-analysts.html">here</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Business analyst salary</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The average annual salary for an IT business analyst is $80,692, according to <a href="https://www.payscale.com/research/US/Job=Business_Analyst%2C_IT/Salary" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">data from PayScale</a>. The highest paid BAs are in New York, where the average salary is 14% higher than the national average. Dallas, Texas, is second, with reported salaries 6.4% higher than the national average, closely followed by Washington, D.C., where salaries are 6.3% higher than the national average.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Some skills are in higher demand than others, with the potential to boost salary. According to Payscale, these are associated with higher BA salaries. These skills, and the amount they can boost your salary, include:</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><div class="overflow-table-wrapper"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><tbody><tr><td>Skills</td><td>Salary Boost</td></tr><tr><td>ScrumMaster</td><td>44%</td></tr><tr><td>Microsoft Azure</td><td>30%</td></tr><tr><td>Supply Chain</td><td>27%</td></tr><tr><td>Oracle eBusiness Suite</td><td>25%</td></tr><tr><td>Master Data Management (SAP MDM)</td><td>24%</td></tr><tr><td>SAP Sales and Distribution (SAP SD)</td><td>24%</td></tr><tr><td>Product Support</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>Microsoft Dynamics GP</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>SAP Quality Management (SAP QM)</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>Workday Software</td><td>15%</td></tr></tbody></table> </div></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For tips on boosting your salary, click <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/189510/7-steps-business-analysts-can-take-to-earn-more.html">here</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Business analyst certifications</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Although business analysis is a relatively new discipline in IT, a handful of organizations already offer certifications to help boost your résumé and prove your merit as an analyst. Organizations such as the IIBA, IQBBA, IREB, and PMI each offer their own tailored certifications for business analysis. These include:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>IIBA <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/189169/ecba-certification-an-entry-level-credential-for-business-analysts.html">Entry Certificate in Business Analysis (ECBA)</a></li>



<li>IIBA Certification of Competency in Business Analysis (CCBA)</li>



<li>IIBA Certified Business Analysis Professional (CBAP)</li>



<li>IIBA Agile Analysis Certification (AAC)</li>



<li>IQBBA Certified Foundation Level Business Analyst (CFLBA)</li>



<li>IREB Certified Professional for Requirements Engineering (CPRE)</li>



<li>PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PBA)</li>



<li>Certified Analytics Professional (CAP)</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For more information about how to earn one of these certifications — and how much they cost — click <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/228834/6-business-analyst-certifications-to-advance-your-analytics-career.html">here</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Business analytics tools and software</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">BAs typically rely on software such as Microsoft’s Excel, PowerPoint, and Access, as well as SQL, Google Analytics, and Tableau. These tools help BAs collect and sort data, create graphs, write documents, and design visualizations to explain findings. You won’t necessarily need programming or database skills for a BA position, but if you already have these skills, they won’t hurt. The type of software and tools you’ll need to use, however, will depend on your job title and what the organization requires.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The Microsoft agent framework wars are over. The real architecture decision starts now]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Over the past year, I had the same conversation with almost every team starting an AI initiative. Should we build on Semantic Kernel, AutoGen or Foundry?



At first it felt like the most important architectural decision we’d make. Each framework had its own philosophy, each promised to be the fo...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691079/ai-nachrichten/the-microsoft-agent-framework-wars-are-over-the-real-architecture-decision-starts-now/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691079/ai-nachrichten/the-microsoft-agent-framework-wars-are-over-the-real-architecture-decision-starts-now/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 11:04:58 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Over the past year, I had the same conversation with almost every team starting an AI initiative. Should we build on Semantic Kernel, AutoGen or Foundry?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">At first it felt like the most important architectural decision we’d make. Each framework had its own philosophy, each promised to be the foundation for enterprise AI, and picking the wrong one felt like an expensive mistake. I spent a lot of time helping teams weigh the trade-offs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Looking back, I think we were asking the wrong question. I certainly was.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I watched teams spend months debating SDKs while the decisions that actually decided whether their applications survived production went unexamined. Some built elaborate orchestration layers for workflows that a few deterministic functions would have handled. Others avoided agent frameworks entirely and later found they’d designed themselves into a corner.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Then Microsoft settled it for us. It <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/agent-framework/overview/">introduced the unified Agent Framework</a>, quietly moved Semantic Kernel and AutoGen into <a href="https://devblogs.microsoft.com/agent-framework/migrate-your-semantic-kernel-and-autogen-projects-to-microsoft-agent-framework-release-candidate/">maintenance mode</a>, and the debate I’d spent months refereeing was suddenly over. Turns out the answer to “which of the three” was “none of the three, here’s a fourth.” The framework hit version 1.0 and general availability in April 2026, stable across .NET and Python.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What surprised me wasn’t the decision. It was how fast a debate that had eaten so much of our attention stopped mattering. Microsoft changed the menu.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It didn’t change the meal.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The framework was never the hard part</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Framework selection dominated almost every early conversation I had about enterprise agents. Which SDK do we standardize on? Which orchestration model gives us the most flexibility? Which one is Microsoft actually betting on?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Fair questions. But after a year of watching these projects play out, I’ve slowly come around to a different view. Those weren’t the questions that decided anything.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The first question I ask now is much smaller. Does this thing actually need an agent?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It sounds obvious, and I still get it wrong sometimes. But it’s the mistake I see most. On one project, a team spent weeks designing a multi-agent workflow for a process that ran the same four steps every time: read a document, validate it, call an API, send a notification. The diagrams looked great. The system in production didn’t. A few well-tested functions would have been easier to build, easier to maintain and a lot easier to trust.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Part of this is just that “<strong>agent</strong>” has become the word everyone reaches for. Sometimes it’s the right call. Sometimes it’s a workflow we already knew how to build, wearing a newer label. An agent earns its complexity when it genuinely has to decide things you can’t predetermine, choosing between tools, adapting to what it finds, working out its own next step. If you already know every step, you have a workflow, and a workflow is usually the better engineering choice. The consolidation didn’t change that. It just made it easier to see.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What building production agents actually taught me</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Once I stopped fixating on frameworks, the same three problems kept showing up. None of them had anything to do with the SDK.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Context beats model choice</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Early on I spent a lot of time comparing models, the way you’d agonize over a restaurant menu and then order what you always order. Now I spend most of it thinking about context, which is far less fun and far more useful.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I’ve watched good models fail because they were handed too much, not too little. One team I worked with gave the model access to nearly every internal document they had on the theory that more information meant better answers. It went the other way. Responses got slower, less consistent and sometimes skipped right past the thing that actually mattered. When we cut the context down to only what the task needed, the quality jumped almost immediately. I didn’t predict that. It taught me to be suspicious of “just give it everything.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The best agent systems I’ve worked on weren’t the ones with the biggest context windows. They were the ones careful about what reached the model, and when. That’s not something the framework hands you.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Failure is where the real work is</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most agent demos look great because they’re built around the happy path. Production doesn’t extend that courtesy.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I remember a project where everything held up in testing. Then a downstream API timed out after the agent had already completed several earlier steps. We couldn’t just restart, because part of the business process had already gone through. We ended up spending far more time on recovery logic than we ever spent on prompts. That project changed how I think about this work. The hard part was never getting the model to make a decision. It was making sure the system didn’t fall apart when reality refused to follow the script.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Tool calls fail partway through. APIs return inconsistent data. Models call the same tool over and over because the last answer wasn’t what they wanted. That’s not the exception; that’s a normal Tuesday. Whether you retry, roll back, pause for a human or push on with partial results is a judgment call, and no framework is going to make it for you.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Identity is the real security boundary</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This one surprised me most. The moment an agent stops being a chatbot and starts touching real business systems, identity matters more than orchestration.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Every project gets to the same question eventually. Who is this agent actually acting as? The developer’s credentials? A service account? The user who asked? Get it wrong and you’ve built something autonomous running with more access than any single person should have, which is exactly the kind of thing that looks fine until an audit. The Agent Framework, like most modern tooling, makes it easier to wire agents to tools through standards like the <a href="https://modelcontextprotocol.io/">Model Context Protocol</a>. That helps. But where human approval belongs, what needs extra authorization, how much rope to give the thing, those are still yours to decide.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">The surprises weren’t technical</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Here’s what I didn’t see coming. The hardest part of last year wasn’t technical at all. It was organizational. The moment a team heard “agent,” expectations shifted under everyone’s feet. Business stakeholders started expecting full autonomy. Developers assumed the thing could reason its way through anything. People started designing for flexibility before we’d even agreed on what problem we were solving. The word did damage before any code did. I found myself spending as much time resetting expectations as I did discussing architecture.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Build for change, not for today’s winner</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I don’t think the teams that struggled last year picked the wrong framework. Semantic Kernel was reasonable. AutoGen was reasonable. Foundry made sense for plenty of cases. I’d have signed off on any of them.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The ones that got hurt put all their eggs in one framework, treating it as the foundation of the whole system instead of as one more dependency. Microsoft provided a migration path. But teams that had tightly coupled their applications to framework-specific abstractions discovered that migrating and rewriting are not the same thing. That wasn’t Microsoft’s doing. It was their own architecture’s. The teams that moved easily had kept their business logic, prompts and orchestration loose enough to evolve independently of any one SDK. For them, the change was a manageable project, not a teardown.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For what it’s worth, nobody I work with is treating this as an emergency. Most are moving the smaller workloads first, watching how they behave and leaving the production-critical systems alone until they actually understand the new abstractions. That’s the right instinct. And I doubt this is the last consolidation we’ll see, the ecosystem is still young, frameworks will keep absorbing each other and over time the differences between them will be operational more than architectural.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I don’t regret the framework debates, honestly. They were reasonable at the time. What changed wasn’t Microsoft’s roadmap.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It was mine. Watching these systems run in production taught me that the framework is the easiest piece to swap out. Recovery logic, context management, security boundaries, the business workflow itself, those stay with you long after today’s SDK gets replaced by tomorrow’s.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">So, Microsoft made one decision easier by turning three frameworks into one. Good. Five years from now we’ll be on different tools, and we’ll still be asking the same handful of questions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Does this actually need an agent? Does it have the right context? Can it recover when something breaks, because something will? Is it acting as the right person?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Those questions outlast every rewrite. That’s where I’ve learned to put my effort.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Frameworks come and go. Good architecture has to survive all of them.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[OpenAI verliert Kontrolle über seine KI – und macht einen PR-Stunt draus]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag OpenAI verliert Kontrolle über seine KI – und macht einen PR-Stunt draus erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
OpenAI hat einen „beispiellosen Cybervorfall“ eingeräumt. KI-Modelle des ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691066/it-nachrichten/openai-verliert-kontrolle-ueber-seine-ki-und-macht-einen-pr-stunt-draus/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691066/it-nachrichten/openai-verliert-kontrolle-ueber-seine-ki-und-macht-einen-pr-stunt-draus/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 11:03:42 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/24/openai-verliert-kontrolle-ueber-ki/">OpenAI verliert Kontrolle über seine KI – und macht einen PR-Stunt draus</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>OpenAI hat einen „beispiellosen Cybervorfall“ eingeräumt. KI-Modelle des Unternehmens sollen eigenständig aus einer Testumgebung ausgebrochen sein und sich Zugang zum offenen Internet verschafft haben. Anschließend hackten sie ein anderes Unternehmen. Politik, Wirtschaft und KI-Szene zeigen sich schockiert. Der Fall offenbart große Risiken durch autonome KI-Agenten, dürfte aber auch Teil eines geschickten PR-Manövers sein. Denn: OpenAI […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/24/openai-verliert-kontrolle-ueber-ki/">OpenAI verliert Kontrolle über seine KI – und macht einen PR-Stunt draus</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[2.2 Million Vehicles Exposed to KARR Bluetooth Security Flaw]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Millions of drivers with a dealer-installed KARR Security System are being urged to update their KARR alarm using an iPhone or Android device after researchers uncovered a Bluetooth vulnerability that could allow nearby attackers to unlock or immobilize affected vehicles.  

The flaw impacts mo...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690937/it-security-nachrichten/22-million-vehicles-exposed-to-karr-bluetooth-security-flaw/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690937/it-security-nachrichten/22-million-vehicles-exposed-to-karr-bluetooth-security-flaw/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 09:54:05 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="826" height="496" src="https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/KARR-Security-System.webp" class="attachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="KARR Security System" decoding="async" srcset="https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/KARR-Security-System.webp 826w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/KARR-Security-System-300x180.webp 300w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/KARR-Security-System-768x461.webp 768w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/KARR-Security-System-600x360.webp 600w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/KARR-Security-System-150x90.webp 150w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/KARR-Security-System-750x450.webp 750w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/KARR-Security-System.webp 826w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/KARR-Security-System-300x180.webp 300w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/KARR-Security-System-768x461.webp 768w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/KARR-Security-System-600x360.webp 600w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/KARR-Security-System-150x90.webp 150w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/KARR-Security-System-750x450.webp 750w" sizes="(max-width: 826px) 100vw, 826px" title="2.2 Million Vehicles Exposed to KARR Bluetooth Security Flaw 1"></p><span data-contrast="auto">Millions of drivers with a dealer-installed KARR Security System are being urged to update their KARR alarm using an iPhone or Android device after researchers uncovered a Bluetooth vulnerability that could allow nearby attackers to unlock or immobilize affected vehicles. </span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span>

<span data-contrast="auto">The flaw impacts more than 2.2 million vehicles equipped with the aftermarket security system, but it does not affect factory-installed vehicle software, Apple CarPlay or Apple's iPhone platform.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span>
<h3 aria-level="2"><b><span data-contrast="none">KARR Security System Vulnerability Affects Dealer-installed Hardware</span></b><span data-ccp-props='{"134245418":true,"134245529":true,"335559738":160,"335559739":80}'> </span></h3>
<span data-contrast="auto">The KARR <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://thecyberexpress.com/" title="Security" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29119">Security</a> System is installed by dealerships to secure vehicles on their lots. In many cases, the hardware remains connected even after buyers decline the paid KARR alarm service. Because it is third-party equipment, automakers cannot deliver fixes through their standard software update process.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span>

<span data-contrast="auto">Researchers from the <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/22/if-youve-got-this-dealer-installed-car-alarm-patch-it-today-with-your-iphone" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">University of California</a>, San Diego found that attackers within Bluetooth range could lock or unlock vehicles, disable alarms, activate horns, flash lights, or prevent parked vehicles from starting. However, they confirmed the flaw cannot remotely start a vehicle or control it while driving.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span>
<h3 aria-level="2"><b><span data-contrast="none">iPhone App Update Fixes KARR Alarm Flaw</span></b><span data-ccp-props='{"134245418":true,"134245529":true,"335559738":160,"335559739":80}'> </span></h3>
<span data-contrast="auto">Acrisure Protection Group, which sells the KARR Security System, released a firmware update on July 20 after researchers privately disclosed the issue in January 2025. Owners using the KARR Security app on an <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/iphone-bootrom-vulnerability/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">iPhone</a> should receive an update notification. Others must download the app, connect it to the KARR alarm, then navigate to "Customer Service" and "Firmware Update."</span>

<span data-contrast="auto">The patch was released before presentations scheduled for DEF CON on August 9 in Las Vegas and the USENIX Security Symposium on August 12 in Baltimore.</span>
<h3 aria-level="2"><b><span data-contrast="none">Hidden KARR Security System Complicates Updates</span></b><span data-ccp-props='{"134245418":true,"134245529":true,"335559738":160,"335559739":80}'> </span></h3>
<span data-contrast="auto">Researchers estimate at least half of affected owners never requested the KARR Security System. Dealerships often left deactivated hardware installed, yet researchers found these units continued broadcasting <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/apple-airpods-firmware-update/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Bluetooth</a> signals while vehicles were running and for up to 10 minutes after being switched off.</span>

<span data-contrast="auto">Owners can identify the system by checking for a KARR or "SWDS" sticker on the driver's window or a blinking button beneath the dashboard. Most affected vehicles were purchased from Honda, Toyota, Mazda, Ford and Jeep dealerships in Southern California between 2017 and July 21, although impacted vehicles were also identified elsewhere.</span>
<h3 aria-level="2"><b><span data-contrast="none">Shared Bluetooth Key Exposes KARR Alarm Devices</span></b></h3>
<span data-contrast="auto">Researchers discovered a universal authentication key embedded in the official smartphone app while reverse engineering Bluetooth communications. Using a proof-of-concept Android app, they unlocked vehicles, disabled KARR alarm functions, and triggered horns and lights.</span>

<span data-contrast="auto">Although the flaw alone cannot steal a vehicle, researchers said it could provide quiet access before a commercially available locksmith tool creates a working key. Acrisure described the attack as "highly complex" and said the real-world <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://thecyberexpress.com/what-are-risks-in-cybersecurity/" title="risk" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29118">risk</a> is low. Neither UC San Diego nor Wired found evidence of <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/nation-state-hackers-weaponize-winrar-flaw/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">criminals</a> exploiting the vulnerability.</span>
<h3 aria-level="2"><b><span data-contrast="none">Privacy Concerns and Recommended Action</span></b></h3>
<span data-contrast="auto">Researchers also warned that Bluetooth signals from the KARR Security System could reveal vehicle locations. Using the WiGLE wireless database, they estimated at least 2.2 million Bluetooth-enabled systems had been deployed and detected 97 KARR-equipped vehicles during a 20-minute drive near the UC San Diego campus.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span>

<span data-contrast="auto">Drivers should confirm whether their vehicle contains a KARR Security System, install the latest firmware using the iPhone or Android app, and contact their dealership or KARR support if they cannot complete the update.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[So erklärst du deinen Mitarbeitenden die bAV – ohne dass HR jede Frage selbst beantworten muss]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag So erklärst du deinen Mitarbeitenden die bAV – ohne dass HR jede Frage selbst beantworten muss erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Die betriebliche Altersvorsorge gehört zu den wertv...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690926/it-security-nachrichten/so-erklaerst-du-deinen-mitarbeitenden-die-bav-ohne-dass-hr-jede-frage-selbst-beantworten-muss/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690926/it-security-nachrichten/so-erklaerst-du-deinen-mitarbeitenden-die-bav-ohne-dass-hr-jede-frage-selbst-beantworten-muss/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 09:38:46 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/24/so-erklaerst-du-deinen-mitarbeitenden-die-bav/">So erklärst du deinen Mitarbeitenden die bAV – ohne dass HR jede Frage selbst beantworten muss</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Die betriebliche Altersvorsorge gehört zu den wertvollsten Benefits, die ein Arbeitgeber anbieten kann und gleichzeitig zu den am schlechtesten kommunizierten. Viele HR-Teams kennen das Problem: Die bAV ist eingeführt, der Vertrag mit dem Versicherer steht, die Versorgungsordnung liegt im Ordner. Aber die Mitarbeitenden? Die fragen immer noch, was das eigentlich bedeutet, ob sie mitmachen sollen […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/24/so-erklaerst-du-deinen-mitarbeitenden-die-bav/">So erklärst du deinen Mitarbeitenden die bAV – ohne dass HR jede Frage selbst beantworten muss</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Podcast: Warum Google-Rezensionen immer schlechter werden]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag Podcast: Warum Google-Rezensionen immer schlechter werden erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
BREAK/THE WEEK ist dein wöchentlicher Tech-Talk von BASIC thinking, der dich hinter die ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690885/it-security-nachrichten/podcast-warum-google-rezensionen-immer-schlechter-werden/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690885/it-security-nachrichten/podcast-warum-google-rezensionen-immer-schlechter-werden/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 09:09:41 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/24/btw-012/">Podcast: Warum Google-Rezensionen immer schlechter werden</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>BREAK/THE WEEK ist dein wöchentlicher Tech-Talk von BASIC thinking, der dich hinter die Kulissen der Tech-Welt nimmt. In dieser Ausgabe diskutieren wir über eine Kilometersteuer für E-Autos in Großbritannien, die Quellen von KI-Chatbots und einen Krieg der Sterne bei Google-Rezensionen. Die Themen dieser Ausgabe: Neue Lasertechnik erkennt Methanol in verschlossenen Flaschen EU wechselt Strategie im […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/24/btw-012/">Podcast: Warum Google-Rezensionen immer schlechter werden</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Governing Al agents at scale: Lessons from the leaders who’ve done it]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Enterprise AI leaders from ZoomInfo, Docusign and AppViewX share what it took to build AI Centers of Excellence and govern agent identities inside two companies operating at scale. What you’ll take away: What an AI Center of Excellence looks like day to day at ZoomInfo and Docusign How to govern ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690798/it-security-nachrichten/governing-al-agents-at-scale-lessons-from-the-leaders-whove-done-it/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690798/it-security-nachrichten/governing-al-agents-at-scale-lessons-from-the-leaders-whove-done-it/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 08:10:06 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enterprise AI leaders from ZoomInfo, Docusign and AppViewX share what it took to build AI Centers of Excellence and govern agent identities inside two companies operating at scale. What you’ll take away: What an AI Center of Excellence looks like day to day at ZoomInfo and Docusign How to govern agent identities without standing up a parallel identity stack The traps both leaders worked hard to avoid, and what they’d do differently now What Venkat … <a href="https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2026/07/24/governing-al-agents-at-scale-video/" rel="nofollow">More <span class="meta-nav">→</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2026/07/24/governing-al-agents-at-scale-video/">Governing Al agents at scale: Lessons from the leaders who’ve done it</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/">Help Net Security</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Schnell wie ein Toilettengang: Wie funktioniert Megawattladen?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag Schnell wie ein Toilettengang: Wie funktioniert Megawattladen? erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
In wenigen Minuten Strom für Hunderte Kilometer Reichweite oder einen Lkw während d...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690638/it-nachrichten/schnell-wie-ein-toilettengang-wie-funktioniert-megawattladen/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690638/it-nachrichten/schnell-wie-ein-toilettengang-wie-funktioniert-megawattladen/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 06:02:53 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/24/wie-funktioniert-megawattladen/">Schnell wie ein Toilettengang: Wie funktioniert Megawattladen?</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>In wenigen Minuten Strom für Hunderte Kilometer Reichweite oder einen Lkw während der Pause voll laden: Das soll das sogenannte Megawattladen möglich machen. 2025 eröffneten die ersten Stationen in Europa. Wir verraten dir, wie die Technologie funktioniert.  Elektrofahrzeuge schneller laden zu können, bringt für Pkw mehr Reisekomfort und mehr Wirtschaftlichkeit für Lkw im Fernverkehr. Um […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/24/wie-funktioniert-megawattladen/">Schnell wie ein Toilettengang: Wie funktioniert Megawattladen?</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Is AI killing critical thinking in the classroom?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Building effective frameworks could help promote ‘deep thinking’ rather than ‘cognitive atrophy’]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690632/ai-nachrichten/is-ai-killing-critical-thinking-in-the-classroom/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690632/ai-nachrichten/is-ai-killing-critical-thinking-in-the-classroom/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 05:48:39 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Building effective frameworks could help promote ‘deep thinking’ rather than ‘cognitive atrophy’]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Ford setzt auf Apple Maps: Ist das auch für Deutschland relevant?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Ford und Apple haben am gestrigen Abend einen großen Deal verkündet, denn man arbeitet in der Automobilbranche zusammen. Apple Maps wird die Basis bei der kommenden UEV-Plattform (Universal Electric Vehicle) …]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690628/it-nachrichten/ford-setzt-auf-apple-maps-ist-das-auch-fuer-deutschland-relevant/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690628/it-nachrichten/ford-setzt-auf-apple-maps-ist-das-auch-fuer-deutschland-relevant/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 05:47:33 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="1600" height="1100" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.mobiflip.de/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/ford-logo-2025-neu-header.jpg?fit=1600%2C1100&amp;ssl=1" class="attachment-full size-full wp-post-image" alt="" decoding="async" fetchpriority="high" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.mobiflip.de/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/ford-logo-2025-neu-header.jpg?w=1600&amp;ssl=1 1600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.mobiflip.de/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/ford-logo-2025-neu-header.jpg?resize=690%2C474&amp;ssl=1 690w" sizes="(max-width: 1600px) 100vw, 1600px">
Ford und Apple haben am gestrigen Abend einen großen Deal verkündet, denn man arbeitet in der Automobilbranche zusammen. Apple Maps wird die Basis bei der kommenden UEV-Plattform (Universal Electric Vehicle) …]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Universal secures rights for film adaptations of 10 Atari games]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Gear up for the Atari Cinematic Universe.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690068/it-nachrichten/universal-secures-rights-for-film-adaptations-of-10-atari-games/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690068/it-nachrichten/universal-secures-rights-for-film-adaptations-of-10-atari-games/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 21:23:06 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Gear up for the Atari Cinematic Universe.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple Maps Is Coming to Ford’s Electric Vehicles in 2027]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple Maps will come built into Ford’s upcoming Universal Electric Vehicle Platform in 2027, giving drivers direct access to navigation, traffic updates, EV routing, and hands-free driving support without needing an iPhone.



Apple and Ford announced the partnership as part of a broader plan to ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690054/ios-mac-os/apple-maps-is-coming-to-fords-electric-vehicles-in-2027/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690054/ios-mac-os/apple-maps-is-coming-to-fords-electric-vehicles-in-2027/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 21:12:26 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple Maps will come built into Ford’s upcoming Universal Electric Vehicle Platform in 2027, giving drivers direct access to navigation, traffic updates, EV routing, and hands-free driving support without needing an iPhone.



Apple and Ford announced the partnership as part of a broader plan to bring Apple Maps directly into vehicle displays through Apple’s new MapKit for Automotive SDK. Ford will use the software across its upcoming electric vehicle platform, while drivers will still have the option to use CarPlay.



The built-in Apple Maps experience will include turn-by-turn directions, natural language guidance, live traffic information, incident alerts, detailed place cards, and route suggestions. Drivers will also get EV-focused features such as intelligent routing and battery preconditioning, which prepares the battery before arriving at a charging station.



Apple Maps will also support Ford’s hands-free driving system



Ford plans to use road-level data from Apple Maps to support the next generation of its BlueCruise hands-free highway driving system. The company expects this data to improve the driving experience between highway entrances and exits, while also helping its Latitude AI team develop more advanced hands-free features.



The direct integration means Ford drivers will be able to use Apple Maps even without an iPhone connected to the vehicle. CarPlay will remain available for users who prefer Apple’s full in-car interface.



Ford appears to be one of the first automakers adopting Apple’s new automotive mapping tools, and Apple has already suggested that more partnerships will follow as other manufacturers begin using the MapKit for Automotive SDK.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[In a First, Apple Maps Navigation To Be Embedded In Ford UEV Pickups]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Ford will become the first automaker to embed Apple Maps directly into its vehicles, starting with an all-electric midsize pickup built on its new Universal Electric Vehicle platform. "The pickup -- with Ford testing preproduction models on roads now -- is expected to start at $30,000 when it com...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689930/it-security-nachrichten/in-a-first-apple-maps-navigation-to-be-embedded-in-ford-uev-pickups/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689930/it-security-nachrichten/in-a-first-apple-maps-navigation-to-be-embedded-in-ford-uev-pickups/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 20:13:19 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ford will become the first automaker to embed Apple Maps directly into its vehicles, starting with an all-electric midsize pickup built on its new Universal Electric Vehicle platform. "The pickup -- with Ford testing preproduction models on roads now -- is expected to start at $30,000 when it comes to market in 2027," reports the Detroit Free Press. "Ford has said several other EVs off that platform will follow, including a small all-electric SUV." From the report: Ford CEO Jim Farley said the new EVs will redefine advanced technology as simple, useful, and at a price point that is attainable for most people. "We're proud to embed Apple Maps' navigation and mapping technology directly into our Universal Electric Vehicle Platform, giving customers the ultimate navigation experience alongside our Ford app, a full suite of software, and next-generation BlueCruise, all enabled by a new zonal architecture," Farley said in a statement. "Apple Maps has delivered a world-class product, and we're honored to be among the first to embed it directly into a vehicle, helping define intuitive, capable driving."
 
In a joint statement, Apple and Ford said the integration will deliver a "beautiful and easy-to-use navigation experience powered by Apple Maps directly to the vehicle's displays. Road-level Maps information will also enable Ford's Latitude AI team to build a seamless hands-free driving experience." Ford said it will use that road information to develop its next-generation BlueCruise hands-free highway driving capability. Also, by leveraging Apple's new MapKit for Automotive SDK, Ford's UEV Platform will offer drivers turn-by-turn directions using natural language, real-time traffic information, intuitive search and routing options for the best route. The system will give drivers EV routing functionality to help drivers with the warming and cooling process of the vehicle's battery before driving or fast-charging.<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=In+a+First%2C+Apple+Maps+Navigation+To+Be+Embedded+In+Ford+UEV+Pickups%3A+https%3A%2F%2Ftech.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F23%2F1626218%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftech.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F23%2F1626218%2Fin-a-first-apple-maps-navigation-to-be-embedded-in-ford-uev-pickups%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://tech.slashdot.org/story/26/07/23/1626218/in-a-first-apple-maps-navigation-to-be-embedded-in-ford-uev-pickups?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Deutsche Forscher bauen sprechende Batterie für Elektroautos]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag Deutsche Forscher bauen sprechende Batterie für Elektroautos erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Ein neues Prinzip könnte Batteriemanagementsysteme in Elektroautos oder Heimspeichern...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689926/it-security-nachrichten/deutsche-forscher-bauen-sprechende-batterie-fuer-elektroautos/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689926/it-security-nachrichten/deutsche-forscher-bauen-sprechende-batterie-fuer-elektroautos/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 20:12:44 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/23/sprechende-batterie-elektroautos/">Deutsche Forscher bauen sprechende Batterie für Elektroautos</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Ein neues Prinzip könnte Batteriemanagementsysteme in Elektroautos oder Heimspeichern künftig kostengünstiger und sicherer machen. Denn deutsche Forscher haben eine sprechende Batterie entwickelt, die ihren Zustand aus ihrem Inneren heraus übermitteln soll.  Bislang messen Sensoren die Temperatur von Batteriezellen meist nur an der Außenseite, obwohl Hitze oft zuerst im Inneren entsteht. Ein Forscherteam der Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/23/sprechende-batterie-elektroautos/">Deutsche Forscher bauen sprechende Batterie für Elektroautos</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Agentic orchestration: Enterprise AI organizations have a deployment problem, not a platform problem — and most are calling chatbots agents]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Across 101 enterprises, agent orchestration is consolidating onto model-provider platforms — Anthropic’s Claude leads by a wide margin — chosen for the gravity of the underlying model and judged on reliable multi-step execution. But the ambition runs well ahead of the reality: most deployed “agen...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689830/it-nachrichten/agentic-orchestration-enterprise-ai-organizations-have-a-deployment-problem-not-a-platform-problem-and-most-are-calling-chatbots-agents/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689830/it-nachrichten/agentic-orchestration-enterprise-ai-organizations-have-a-deployment-problem-not-a-platform-problem-and-most-are-calling-chatbots-agents/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:19:45 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Across 101 enterprises, agent orchestration is consolidating onto model-provider platforms — Anthropic’s Claude leads by a wide margin — chosen for the gravity of the underlying model and judged on reliable multi-step execution. But the ambition runs well ahead of the reality: most deployed “agents” are still chatbot wrappers, the control plane enterprises expect is deliberately hybrid to avoid lock-in, and real-time fiscal control over token burn remains the exception.</p><p>This wave of VentureBeat Pulse Research examines enterprise agent orchestration: which platforms enterprises run on, what drives the choice, what they optimize for, how they expect agent control to be structured, and — most revealingly — how orchestrated their deployed “agents” actually are and how tightly they control the cost of running them.</p><p>The central finding is a gap between orchestration ambition and orchestration reality. Enterprises are consolidating fast onto the major model platforms: Anthropic’s Claude is the primary platform for 40%, more than double any rival, followed by Microsoft (18%) and OpenAI (13%). The choice is driven by “model gravity” — native alignment with a state-of-the-art base model (21%) — and success is judged by reliable, multi-step execution (task completion reliability 32%, multi-step workflow management 28%). Yet asked to assess their portfolios honestly, 71% say a quarter or fewer of their deployed “agents” are true multi-step orchestrated workflows rather than single-prompt chatbot wrappers, and only 10% have crossed the halfway mark. The orchestration layer is being built well ahead of the orchestrated portfolio it is meant to run.</p><p>That gap shapes the architecture enterprises are putting in place. By the end of 2026 a clear majority (51%) expect a hybrid control plane — provider-native plus external orchestration — and only 6% expect to hand control to a provider-managed service, because vendor lock-in (35%) is the risk they fear most if control lives inside a model provider. Investment follows the build-out: agent workflow tooling leads the spend (34%), with security and permissions enforcement (25%) behind. And fiscal control lags throughout — more than a quarter (27%) have no real-time way to stop a runaway agent before the bill arrives.</p><h2>Methodology</h2><p>VentureBeat fielded this survey as part of its ongoing Pulse Research series, this instrument focused on enterprise agent orchestration. Responses are filtered to organizations with 100 or more employees (n=101), drawn from a single June 2026 wave; because this is one wave rather than a pooled multi-month sample, the report reads cross-sectionally and does not infer month-over-month trends.</p><p>By organization size the sample is spread evenly across the enterprise bands: 100–499 employees, 2,500–9,999, and 50,000+ (21% each), with 10,000–49,999 and 500–2,499 (19% each). By role it is senior and buyer-credible: product and program managers (15%), CIO/CTO/CISO (13%), consultants and advisors (13%), and a spread of data, AI, and engineering directors and VPs, with an “Other” function at 18%. On purchasing, 81% are recommenders, influencers, or final decision-makers for AI solutions (66% recommender/influencer, 15% final decision-maker). Technology/Software is the largest industry at 44%, followed by Financial Services (17%) and Healthcare/Life Sciences (8%).</p><p>At 101 respondents the sample is robust enough to read directionally with reasonable confidence, though it remains self-selected and is not a probability sample.</p><h2>Finding 1: Orchestration runs on model-provider platforms</h2><p><b>Anthropic’s Claude leads; open frameworks are marginal</b></p><p>We asked which agent orchestration platform enterprises primarily use today. The answer concentrates on the major model providers — and on one in particular.</p><div></div><p>A note on reading these shares. As described in the methodology section, the respondents are self-selected, and this question asked them for a single primary platform — so the figures measure which platform leads each enterprise's deployment, within a self-selected audience of AI-active technical decision-makers. A sample built this way can diverge substantially from spend-weighted market measures, and each VB Pulse survey draws its own sample with its own company-size mix, so vendor figures should not be compared across our surveys either. Read these shares as a portrait of where this cohort has placed its primary orchestration bet today, rather than as market share.</p><p>The model platforms dominate. Anthropic, Microsoft, OpenAI, Google, and Amazon together account for roughly 80% of deployments (81 of 101), while the open frameworks (LangChain/LangGraph) and custom in-house builds that anchor engineering discussion sit in single digits. Anthropic’s lead — 40%, more than double the next platform — mirrors the “model gravity” selection logic in Finding 2: enterprises are choosing the orchestration layer that comes with the model they want to build on. As with the security vendors in the prior agent-security wave, the tools that define the category in technical circles are not yet where enterprise deployment concentrates. A small 3% are not orchestrating at all.</p><p>Respondents rate the platforms they run at 3.94 out of 5 overall (109 answered), with “value for money” specifically at 3.94 and “ease of implementation” the weakest score, at 3.85 — placing orchestration near the bottom of our five-tracker satisfaction range, ahead of only evaluation tooling. A rating just under 4 out of 5, from users of whom 96% plan to change their orchestration approach within the year, reads as provisional acceptance: the platforms work well enough to run today, and not well enough to stop the search for something better. The ratings sit alongside near-universal intent to change; this is a layer enterprises tolerate more than they love.</p><h2>Finding 2: Model gravity drives platform selection</h2><p><b>The base model, not the tooling, decides the platform</b></p><p>We asked what most influenced the orchestration platform choice. The single largest factor is the pull of the underlying model — though flexibility and ease of development follow close behind.</p><div></div><p>Model gravity leading is the selection-side explanation for Anthropic’s platform lead: enterprises pick the orchestration environment closest to the frontier model they have standardized on. But the next tier complicates the picture — flexibility across models and tools (17%) and ease of development (17%) say enterprises also want to avoid being trapped by that choice, foreshadowing the lock-in fear in Finding 6. Security and permissions (14%) and total cost of ownership (11%) round out a pragmatic buying logic. Performance (latency/memory) sits last at 4%, a reminder that at this stage of adoption the binding constraints are model fit and optionality, not raw speed.</p><h2>Finding 3: The job is reliable multi-step execution</h2><p><b>Enterprises just orchestration by whether it completes the work</b></p><p>We asked what enterprises optimize for — their primary success metric for orchestration. Reliability and multi-step workflow management dominate; developer- and user-facing metrics trail.</p><div></div><p>Task completion reliability (32%) and multi-step workflow management (28%) together account for 59% of responses (60 of 101): orchestration succeeds, in the enterprise view, when it reliably carries a task through multiple steps to completion. Developer productivity (17%) matters but is secondary — the inverse of its prominence in framework discussion — and end-user experience (9%) is a minor concern, consistent with orchestration being an internal execution problem rather than a UX one. This reliability-first standard is exactly what makes the Chatbot Trap finding so pointed: enterprises define success as dependable multi-step execution, yet most of their deployed “agents” do not yet do multi-step work at all.</p><p>The trap is not evenly distributed. Splitting the sample by organization size, 77% of smaller enterprises say a quarter or fewer of their agents do true multi-step work, against 62% of larger ones. Larger enterprises are meaningfully further into genuine multi-step deployment; the chatbot trap is, directionally, a mid-market condition.</p><h2>Finding 4: Consolidate, productionize, and build in-house </h2><p><b>Three strategic moves are nearly tied for the year ahead</b></p><p>We asked what major change enterprises anticipate in their orchestration strategy over the next 12 months. Three moves cluster at the top, almost evenly split.</p><div></div><p>The top three — building in-house control (25%), standardizing on one framework (24%), and moving agents from sandbox to production (23%) — are statistically indistinguishable and tell a single story: enterprises are moving from experimentation to operational consolidation. They want fewer frameworks, more production exposure, and more ownership of the control layer; only 4% expect no change. The appetite for custom in-house control planes is notable alongside the platform concentration in Finding 1 — enterprises are standardizing on model-provider platforms while simultaneously planning to wrap them in control logic they own, the hybrid posture that Finding 6 makes explicit.</p><h2>Finding 5: Nearly seven in 10 plan to switch — and the biggest group of movers has no shortlist </h2><p>The strategic change enterprises anticipate (previous finding) comes with vendor motion attached. Asked whether they plan to adopt a new, additional, or replacement agent orchestration platform in the next twelve months, more respondents are moving here than in any other layer we track.</p><div></div><p>Asked which platforms they are considering, the most common answer among those in motion is none yet: 29% of all respondents are evaluating without a shortlist, the largest single response after "not considering a change." Among named candidates, OpenAI leads at 16%, followed by LangChain/LangGraph at 12% and Anthropic at 7% — and notably, the independent frameworks draw roughly double their current usage footprint in forward consideration, the same pattern our security tracker found for specialist vendors. Read with this report's concentration and lock-in findings, the picture completes itself: the major model-platform providers hold roughly four-fifths of today's primary usage, vendor lock-in has become the leading fear, 96% anticipate a strategic change — and now the purchase intent to act on all of it, with the largest bloc of buyers still undecided. The most concentrated layer of the agentic stack is also, as of June, the least settled.</p><h2>Finding 6: Investment flows to workflow tooling</h2><p><b>Tooling and permissions lead the spend; monitoring trails</b></p><p>We asked which orchestration-related investment will grow most next year. Agent workflow tooling leads, with security and permissions enforcement behind.</p><div></div><p>Workflow tooling leading (34%) is the budget-side expression of the reliability-and-multi-step priority in Finding 3: the money is going to the machinery that strings steps together dependably. Security and permissions enforcement (25%) and scaling infrastructure (20%) follow — the investments required to take agents from sandbox into production, the strategic move in Finding 4. Monitoring and debugging draws a smaller 11%, with another 11% reporting flat budgets. The weight on tooling, permissions, and scaling over pure observability signals that enterprises are spending to build and harden orchestration, not merely to watch it run.</p><h2>Finding 7: The control plane will be hybrid — and lock-in is why</h2><p><b>Enterprises expect to split control between providers and their own layer</b></p><p>We asked where enterprises expect the primary control plane for agents to live by the end of 2026, and what worries them most if that control sits inside a model-provider platform. A clear majority expect a hybrid model — and vendor lock-in is the reason.</p><div></div><p>Hybrid control is the dominant expectation by a wide margin (51%), and only 6% expect to hand control to a provider-managed service outright. Read together, the hybrid, custom, and externally-abstracted options — every architecture that keeps control at least partly outside the provider — sum to 88% (89 of 101). The reason surfaces directly when we asked about the risk of provider-resident control: vendor lock-in leads at 35% (35 of 101), ahead of security and permissioning limitations (28%) and inflexibility across models and tools (21%). The pattern echoes the prior wave’s “don’t trust the model to police itself” posture — here, enterprises will build on a provider’s platform but decline to be governed entirely by it. The hybrid control plane is the architectural hedge against the lock-in they most fear.</p><p>The June figure asserting a preference for a hybrid control plane marks movement from earlier. In the April–May survey (n=145), only 34% expected a hybrid control plane, and a greater number (12%) expected to hand control fully to a provider-managed service. These two snapshots don’t yet measure a confirmed longitudinal trend — but the direction of the conversation is unambiguous: toward keeping control.</p><p>Lock-in is also a new arrival as a top concern. In the April–May wave, the leading concern was security and permissioning limitations (32%), with lock-in second at 24%; by June the two had traded places. The worry about provider platforms appears to be maturing from whether they can be secured to whether they can be replaced.</p><h2>Finding 8: The chatbot trap — most “agents” aren’t agents yet</h2><p><b>Enterprises admit most deployments are still chatbot wrappers</b></p><p>We asked enterprises to assess their portfolios honestly: what share of their deployed “agents” are true multi-step orchestrated workflows versus simple single-prompt chatbot wrappers. The answer is the defining finding of this wave.</p><div></div><p>This is the gap at the center of the report. Combining the bottom two bands, 71% of enterprises (72 of 101) say a quarter or fewer of their deployed “agents” are genuinely orchestrated — and just 10% (10 of 101) have crossed the halfway mark. The ambition documented in the earlier findings — model-provider platforms, reliability-first success metrics, production rollouts, a deliberate control architecture — runs well ahead of the deployed reality, which remains overwhelmingly single-prompt assistants dressed as agents. This is less a contradiction than a roadmap: the platforms, budgets, and strategies are being put in place precisely because the orchestrated portfolio is still so thin. The open question for later waves is how fast the reality closes on the ambition.</p><h2>Finding 9: Fiscal control is still reactive</h2><p><b>Only a minority can stop a runaway agent before the bill arrives</b></p><p>Finally, we asked how enterprises enforce fiscal control over agent token consumption — the risk that an autonomous loop exhausts a budget before anyone intervenes. Most rely on native caps or after-the-fact monitoring; real-time programmatic control is the exception.</p><div></div><p>More than a quarter of enterprises (27%) admit they have no real-time, programmatic way to stop an agent before a budget-breaking bill arrives — they learn of it from the logs afterward. Another 32% lean entirely on the native caps and throttles built into their primary platform, a control only as good as the provider’s tooling and one that ties back to the lock-in concern of Finding 6. The enterprises building custom gateways (23%) or exploiting cross-model routing to arbitrage cost (19%) are the ones treating token burn as an engineering problem to be controlled deterministically. As with orchestration maturity, fiscal control is an area where the operational reality lags the ambition: agents are moving toward production faster than the cost-control plane around them is being built.</p><p>It’s worth noting, a split appears according to company size: roughly one in three enterprises under 2,500 employees (34%) exercises only reactive control of agent spend, against 20% of larger enterprises — directional figures, but consistent with the chatbot-trap split. The mid-market is running the least mature agents on the least instrumented budgets.</p><h2>The bottom line: The layer is real; most of the agents aren't yet</h2><p>Organizations with 100 or more employees describe an orchestration strategy that is consolidating quickly and maturing slowly. They are standardizing — for now — on model-provider platforms, which collectively hold roughly four-fifths of primary usage, chosen for the gravity of the underlying model, and they judge success by reliable multi-step execution. Investment is flowing to workflow tooling and permissions, the strategy is to consolidate frameworks and push agents into production, and the control plane they expect is deliberately hybrid, because vendor lock-in is the risk they fear most. But the standardization is provisional: 68% plan to adopt a new, additional, or replacement orchestration platform within twelve months — the highest switching intent of any layer we track — and the largest group of those movers has not yet shortlisted a candidate. Today's concentration describes where enterprises are, and visibly does not describe where they intend to stay.</p><p>But the honest self-assessment punctures the ambition. Seventy-one percent say a quarter or fewer of their deployed "agents" are truly orchestrated, only 10% are past the halfway mark, and more than a quarter cannot stop a runaway agent in real time. The orchestration layer — the platforms, the budgets, the control architecture — is being built ahead of the orchestrated portfolio it is meant to run. At 101 respondents in a single June wave this reads as a clear directional signal rather than a precise measurement: enterprises have decided how they want to orchestrate agents well before most of their agents are doing anything an orchestration layer is for. The questions for subsequent waves are whether the deployed reality closes the gap on the ambition — and, with nearly seven in ten buyers in motion and most of them undecided, which platforms the settled stack finally lands on.</p><hr><p><i>Based on survey responses from 101 qualified enterprise respondents (100+ employees), drawn from a single June 2026 wave. Because this is one wave rather than a pooled multi-month sample, results read directionally rather than as a confirmed trend. Respondents include product and program managers, CIOs, CTOs and CISOs, consultants and advisors, and directors and VPs of data, AI, and engineering, across Technology/Software, Financial Services, Healthcare, and other sectors.</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The agent security gap: 54% of enterprises have already had an AI agent incident, and most still let agents share credentials]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Across 107 enterprises, AI agents are being given real access to systems and data while the controls meant to contain them lag behind. More than half have already had a confirmed agent security incident or a near-miss; only about a third give every agent its own scoped identity, and most agents s...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689827/it-nachrichten/the-agent-security-gap-54-of-enterprises-have-already-had-an-ai-agent-incident-and-most-still-let-agents-share-credentials/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689827/it-nachrichten/the-agent-security-gap-54-of-enterprises-have-already-had-an-ai-agent-incident-and-most-still-let-agents-share-credentials/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:19:41 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Across 107 enterprises, AI agents are being given real access to systems and data while the controls meant to contain them lag behind. More than half have already had a confirmed agent security incident or a near-miss; only about a third give every agent its own scoped identity, and most agents still share credentials; and only three in ten isolate their highest-risk agents. The security stack is overwhelmingly borrowed from the model providers and hyperscalers rather than purpose-built for agents, spending remains a thin slice of the security budget, and enterprises are evenly split on whether their defenses are keeping pace with AI-enabled attackers. The result is an agent security gap — autonomous agents proliferating faster than the identity, isolation, and enforcement controls needed to hold them.</p><p>This wave of VentureBeat Pulse Research examines how enterprises secure their AI agents: what tooling they run, how they manage agent identity and isolation, what has already gone wrong, how much they spend, and whether they believe their defenses are keeping pace with AI-enabled attackers.</p><p>The central finding is an agent security gap — the distance between the autonomy enterprises are granting their agents and the controls in place to contain them. More than half of organizations (54%) have already experienced a confirmed agent security incident (18%) or a near-miss caught before harm (36%). The structural weakness beneath those numbers is identity: only about a third (32%) give every agent its own scoped, managed identity, while the rest report that some agents share credentials or that agents mostly run on shared API keys and human or service-account credentials. When agents share credentials, a single compromised or over-permissioned agent carries a wide blast radius — and only three in ten enterprises (30%) isolate their highest-risk agents in sandboxes to bound that radius.</p><p>What makes the gap notable is how comfortable enterprises are inside it. The security stack is overwhelmingly provider-native — OpenAI’s guardrails (51%), Google’s and Microsoft’s cloud controls, and Anthropic’s managed-agent controls dominate, while the dedicated agent-security specialists barely register — and satisfaction with that borrowed stack is high, averaging 4.2 out of 5. Yet spending remains a thin slice of the security budget, only a third of enterprises believe their AI defenses are ahead of AI-enabled attackers, and a clear majority plan to change tooling within the year. Enterprises are satisfied with controls they are simultaneously preparing to replace.</p><h2>Methodology</h2><p>VentureBeat fielded this survey as part of its ongoing Pulse Research series, this instrument focused on enterprise agent security — the tooling, identity, isolation, and enforcement controls organizations use to secure autonomous AI agents. Responses are filtered to organizations with more than 100 employees (n=107; the survey’s smallest size band, 1–100 employees, is excluded), drawn from a single June 2026 wave. Because this is one wave rather than a pooled multi-month sample, the report reads cross-sectionally and does not infer month-over-month trends. Several questions were multiple-select, so those shares can sum to more than 100%.</p><p>By role the sample is senior and buyer-credible: 45% are final decision-makers for AI purchases and another 30% recommenders or influencers. Managers (43%), individual contributors (24%), VPs and directors (15%), and the C-suite (11%) make up the seniority mix. By organization size the sample is mid-market-weighted: 251–1,000 (42%) and 101–250 (25%) employees lead, with 1,001–5,000 (19%), 5,001–10,000 (8%), and 10,001+ (7%) above them. Technology/Software is the largest industry at 23%, followed by Manufacturing (15%), Retail/E-commerce (14%), and Healthcare/Life Sciences (13%).</p><p>At 107 respondents the sample is large enough to read directionally but should be treated as a directional signal rather than a precise measurement; it is self-selected and is not a probability sample. It skews toward the mid-market, so it is best read as the view from organizations actively standing up agent security rather than from the largest operators.</p><p>Satisfaction ratings are computed on the respondents who answered each rating question; the overall satisfaction score reflects 82 of the 107 qualified respondents.</p><h2>Finding 1: The incidents are already here</h2><p><b>More than half have had an agent security incident or near-miss</b></p><p>We asked whether organizations had experienced an agent security incident — a confirmed breach, or a near-miss caught before harm. Most that run agents in production had.</p><div></div><p>This is the report’s defining number. More than half of organizations (54%) have already had an agent security event — 18% a confirmed incident and 36% a near-miss caught before it caused harm. Only 42% report nothing, and a small remainder either run no agents in production or don’t track such events. That so many report near-misses rather than only confirmed incidents is telling: enterprises are catching problems, but they are catching them close to the edge. The controls examined in the rest of this report — identity, isolation, enforcement — are what determine whether the next near-miss stays a near-miss.</p><p>Exposure scales with company size, but containment does not. The incident-or-near-miss rate rises from 49% in the mid-market (companies with 101-1,000 employees) to 63% at larger enterprises (above 1,000 employees), while sandbox isolation of high-risk agents falls from 35% to 20%, and satisfaction with security tooling drops from 4.36 to 3.97. The organizations running the most agents across the most systems carry the most incidents and the least of the one control that bounds an incident's blast radius.</p><h2>Finding 2: The identity gap</h2><p><b>Only a third give every agent its own scoped identity</b></p><p>We asked how enterprises manage the identity of their AI agents — whether each agent has its own credentials, or agents share them. Full per-agent identity is the exception.</p><div></div><p>Rolled together, the overlapping answers show 69% of enterprises (74 of 107) with credential sharing somewhere in the agent fleet. Identity is the structural weakness beneath the incidents. Only about a third of enterprises (32%) give every agent its own scoped, managed identity — the precondition for least-privilege access and clean attribution. Nearly half (48%) say some agents have scoped identities but many still share credentials, and another 32% say agents mostly run on shared API keys or borrowed human and service-account credentials. (Respondents could describe more than one pattern across their agent fleet, so these overlap.) </p><p>The consequence is direct: when agents share credentials, an over-permissioned or compromised agent can act with far more reach than intended, and forensics after an incident cannot cleanly tell which agent did what. The non-human identity problem — giving every agent its own governed identity — is the single largest unfinished piece of enterprise agent security.</p><p>Moreover, a company’s agent credential posture is correlated with incidents. Organizations with credential sharing anywhere in the fleet were hit — with an incident or a near-miss in the past twelve months — at 63.5% (47 of 74). Organizations where every agent carries its own scoped identity were hit at 40.9% (9 of 22). The fully-scoped group is small, so for now the relationship is an association rather than proven causation, and the gap is concentrated in the mid-market — but within a single survey, a twenty-three point difference in incident rate suggests significance.</p><h2>Finding 3: Observe and enforce, but rarely isolate</h2><p><b>Only three in 10 sandbox their highest-risk agents</b></p><p>We asked what an organization’s agent security posture looks like in practice — whether they observe, enforce, isolate, or some combination. The control that bounds damage is the least common.</p><div></div><p>Monitoring and enforcement are reasonably common; containment is not. Roughly half of enterprises observe agent activity (47%) or enforce scoped permissions at runtime (49%), but only 30% isolate their highest-risk agents in sandboxes that bound the blast radius when the other controls fail. That ordering is backwards from a defense-in-depth standpoint: observation tells you what happened, enforcement tries to prevent it, but isolation is what limits the damage when prevention fails — and it is the control enterprises have adopted least. Combined with the identity gap in Finding 2, the picture is of agents that are watched and permissioned but rarely boxed in, which is precisely the configuration in which a single failure propagates.</p><h2>Finding 4: Security runs on borrowed, provider-native controls</h2><p><b>Guardrails from OpenAI, Google and Microsoft dominate; specialists barely register</b></p><p>We asked which agent security tooling enterprises use, and which is their primary layer. The answer favors the model providers and hyperscalers over the dedicated security vendors.</p><div></div><p>Enterprises are securing agents with tools that came bundled with their models and clouds. OpenAI’s guardrails lead at 51%, followed by Google’s and Microsoft’s cloud-native controls and Anthropic’s managed-agent controls — and when asked to name their single primary security layer, 82% name one of these provider-native offerings. The purpose-built agent-security category — Palo Alto’s Prisma AIRS, CrowdStrike, Cisco AI Defense, Zenity, HiddenLayer, Check Point’s Lakera, Okta for AI Agents, non-human identity platforms — barely registers, each in the low single digits, and only 5% run no dedicated tooling at all. As with retrieval and evaluation elsewhere in this series, the provider bundle is winning the default: enterprises reach first for the guardrails their platform ships, and the independent security layer that would address the identity and isolation gaps has not yet been adopted at scale.</p><p>The provider-default pattern is consistent across both Q2 survey waves. In April–May (n=110), usage was led by the same names — OpenAI's controls at 26%, Azure at 15%, AWS at 14%, Google at 12% — with every dedicated agent-security specialist at 3% or below and one in ten using no dedicated tooling at all. The common finding from the two surveys: Enterprises are defaulting to the solutions provided by the platform they’re using, and the specialist category vendors have yet to become big players here.</p><p>(<i>A note on reading these shares. As described in the methodology section, the respondent sample is self-selected and skews mid-market, and the usage question counted every vendor or approach a respondent has in place — so the figures measure presence in the security stack rather than spending or exclusivity. Individual vendor percentages therefore carry all the usual sample caveats. The structural pattern, however, held across both Q2 waves on two differently worded questions: provider-native and hyperscaler controls lead, and dedicated agent-security specialists remain in low single digits. Read the individual shares loosely and the pattern with confidence.)</i></p><h2>Finding 5: And enterprises are comfortable with it</h2><p><b>Satisfaction is high, even as incidents mount and identity lags</b></p><p>We asked how satisfied enterprises are with their current agent security tooling. The comfort is notably out of step with the exposure documented above.</p><div></div><p>Satisfaction with agent security tooling is high — 4.2 out of 5 overall, and 4.1 for value for money — among the most positive readings in this series. That is the striking part: enterprises are highly satisfied with a stack that is mostly borrowed provider guardrails, even though more than half have already had an incident or near-miss and only a third give their agents scoped identities. The comfort appears to rest on the convenience and low friction of provider-native controls rather than on demonstrated containment. It is a false comfort in the making — the same enterprises expressing satisfaction are, as Finding 8 shows, a clear majority planning to change tooling within the year, which suggests the confidence is thinner than the score implies.</p><h2>Finding 6: Budgets haven’t caught up</h2><p><b>Most spend under a tenth of the security budget on agents</b></p><p>We asked what share of the security budget enterprises allocate to securing AI agents. For a fast-emerging risk, the allocation is modest.</p><div></div><p>Spending on agent security is still a thin slice. The most common allocation is 6–10% of the security budget (46%), and a third of enterprises (34%) spend 5% or less; only a quarter (24%) devote more than a tenth. Given the incident rate in Finding 1 and the identity and isolation gaps in Findings 2 and 3, the budget looks like a lagging indicator — the risk has arrived faster than the funding to address it. The enterprises spending more than a tenth of their security budget on agents are a distinct minority, and they are likely the ones building the scoped-identity and isolation controls the rest have not.</p><h1>Finding 7: The arms race is even, at best</h1><p><b>Only a third think their AI defenses are ahead of AI-enabled attackers</b></p><p>We asked how enterprises assess the balance between their AI-enabled defenses and AI-enabled attackers. Confidence is far from settled.</p><div></div><p>Enterprises are split on whether they are winning. Only about a third (35%) believe their AI-enabled defenses are ahead of AI-enabled attackers; the rest are less sure — 32% call it roughly even, 21% think attackers are ahead, and another 21% say it is too early to tell. Taken together, a clear majority (53%) rate the balance as even or tilted toward the attacker. That uncertainty sits uneasily beside the high satisfaction of Finding 5: enterprises are content with their tooling yet unconvinced it is winning the contest it exists to win. In a domain where the offense is also compounding with AI, an even race is not a comfortable place to be.</p><h2>Finding 8: A security reshuffle is coming</h2><p><b>Nearly six in 10 plan to adopt or switch tooling within a year</b></p><p>We asked whether enterprises plan to adopt a new, additional, or replacement agent security solution, and which they are considering. Few intend to stand pat.</p><div></div><p>The security stack is not settled. While 41% have no plans to change, a clear majority (59%) intend to adopt a new, additional, or replacement agent security solution within twelve months, and 29% within the next quarter — a strong signal that, high satisfaction notwithstanding, enterprises know the current stack is provisional. Incidents are what start the buying cycle. </p><p>Among organizations that have been hit, 42.1% plan to adopt, add, or replace agent security tooling within the next ninety days, against 14.0% of organizations with no incident — and after a confirmed incident it becomes majority behavior, at 52.6%. Getting hit also changes the threat assessment: 33.3% of hit organizations say AI-armed attackers are ahead of their defenses, against 8.0% of the unhit. Experience, in this data, is the strongest predictor of both urgency and pessimism.</p><p>The consideration set still leans provider-native (OpenAI 34%, Google 30%, Anthropic 29%, Azure 25%), but the dedicated security vendors — Cloudflare, Cisco, Palo Alto, Okta, Check Point’s Lakera — draw early interest in the mid-to-high single digits, more than their current footprint. </p><p>What the shopping does not yet include is the identity layer specifically. Twelve percent of the respondents include an agent-identity product — Okta for AI Agents, Microsoft Entra Agent ID, or a non-human identity platform — anywhere in their consideration set, and among the credential-sharing organizations that have already had an incident, identity consideration is essentially unchanged, at roughly one in ten. The control most directly implicated by the incident data is the one largely missing from the purchase plans. Whether this wave hardens the provider-native default or finally opens the door to purpose-built agent security — the identity and isolation controls the incidents call for — is the question this series will keep tracking.</p><h2>The bottom line: A security gap that autonomy will test first</h2><p>Organizations with more than 100 employees are giving AI agents real reach into systems and data while securing them with controls built for something else. More than half have already had an incident or near-miss; only a third give every agent its own scoped identity, and most still share credentials; only three in ten isolate their highest-risk agents; and the stack doing this work is overwhelmingly borrowed from the model providers and hyperscalers rather than purpose-built for agents.</p><p>The uncomfortable pairing is confidence with exposure: satisfaction with the current tooling is among the highest in this series, yet spending is a thin slice of the security budget, only a third believe their defenses are ahead of AI-enabled attackers, and a clear majority are already planning to replace what they have. At 107 respondents in a single wave this is a directional read, skewed toward the mid-market — but the direction is clear: agent adoption is running ahead of agent security, and the controls that matter most when something fails — scoped identity and isolation — are the ones enterprises have built least. The agent security gap is not a coverage problem that a provider guardrail will close on its own; it is a problem of identity, isolation, and enforcement built for autonomous software. The open question for later waves is whether enterprises close it deliberately — or whether a confirmed incident closes it for them.</p><hr><p><i>Based on survey responses from 107 qualified enterprise respondents (100+ employees), drawn from a single June 2026 wave. This is a directional read, not a precise measurement — the sample is self-selected and skews mid-market, so it's best read as the view from organizations actively standing up agent security rather than from the largest operators. Respondents are senior and buyer-credible (45% final decision-makers, 30% recommenders/influencers), spanning managers through the C-suite, and drawn primarily from Technology/Software, Manufacturing, Retail/E-commerce, and Healthcare/Life Sciences.</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The AI compute gap: Enterprises are buying infrastructure faster than they can measure what it costs]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Across 107 enterprises, AI infrastructure spending is accelerating well ahead of the ability to see or steer its economics. Most organizations run their AI on a familiar base of hyperscalers and model-provider APIs, yet the next dollar is aimed at specialized compute almost none of them use today...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689826/it-nachrichten/the-ai-compute-gap-enterprises-are-buying-infrastructure-faster-than-they-can-measure-what-it-costs/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689826/it-nachrichten/the-ai-compute-gap-enterprises-are-buying-infrastructure-faster-than-they-can-measure-what-it-costs/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:19:39 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Across 107 enterprises, AI infrastructure spending is accelerating well ahead of the ability to see or steer its economics. Most organizations run their AI on a familiar base of hyperscalers and model-provider APIs, yet the next dollar is aimed at specialized compute almost none of them use today; a majority intend to switch or add providers within the year, many within a quarter. Buying decisions turn on integration and total cost of ownership rather than headline token price — which is fortunate, because most enterprises cannot yet see their unit economics clearly: GPUs sit at half utilization or less, and fewer than half rigorously track what their compute actually costs. The result is a compute gap — heavy, fast-moving investment running ahead of the visibility needed to control it.</p><p>This wave of VentureBeat Pulse Research examines enterprise AI infrastructure and compute: where organizations are in their deployment journey, what they run AI on today, how satisfied they are, what would make them switch, where they plan to evaluate their investments, and — most revealingly — how well they can measure and control the economics of the compute underneath it all.</p><p>The central finding is a compute gap — the distance between how aggressively enterprises are investing in AI infrastructure and how little of its economics they can see. Only about one in five (21%) run AI in production at scale, yet spending intentions are outrunning that maturity: the single largest planned area enterprises plan to evaluate over the next year is AI-specialized clouds (45%), a layer almost none of these enterprises use today. Meanwhile the compute already in place runs cold — 83% report GPU utilization of 50% or less — and fewer than half (44%) can rigorously track what their AI compute costs. Enterprises are buying more infrastructure faster than they can account for what they already own.</p><p>Enterprises are not settled on their infrastructure vendors, either: A clear majority (64%) plan to switch or add an infrastructure provider within twelve months, and 38% within the next quarter — unusually high churn intent for a category this foundational. When they choose, they choose on integration with the existing stack (41%) and total cost of ownership (35%), not on headline price: cost per million tokens is the deciding factor for just 8%. And the frontier constraint that will shape the next round of decisions — the shift from GPU compute to memory bandwidth as inference scales — is barely on the radar, with roughly one in five enterprises either unaware of it or yet to address it.</p><h2>Methodology</h2><p>VentureBeat fielded this survey as part of its ongoing Pulse Research series, this survey focused on enterprise AI infrastructure, compute, and inference economics. Responses are filtered to organizations with more than 100 employees (n=107; the survey’s smallest size band, 1–100 employees, is excluded), drawn from a single Q2 2026 (June) wave. Because this is one wave rather than a pooled multi-month sample, the report reads cross-sectionally and does not infer month-over-month trends. Several questions were multiple-select, so those shares can sum to more than 100%.</p><p>By organization size the sample concentrates in the mid-market: 101–250 employees (36%) and 251–1,000 (27%) lead, with 1,001–5,000 (22%), 5,001–10,000 (8%), and 10,001+ (7%) above them. By role it spans managers (38%), individual contributors (28%), VPs and directors (19%), and the C-suite (13%); on purchasing authority it is buyer-credible, with 45% final decision-makers and another 30% recommenders or influencers for AI solutions. Technology/Software is the largest industry at 26%, followed by Healthcare/Life Sciences (15%), Financial Services (13%), and Retail/E-commerce (12%).</p><p>At 107 respondents the sample is large enough to read directionally but should be treated as a directional signal rather than a precise measurement; it is self-selected and is not a probability sample. It also skews toward the mid-market and toward earlier-stage adopters, so it is best read as the view from organizations actively building out AI infrastructure rather than from the largest hyperscale operators.</p><h2>Finding 1: Ambition outpaces production</h2><p><b>Only one in five run AI in production at scale</b></p><p>We asked where organizations sit in their AI deployment journey. Most are still building toward production rather than operating at scale.</p><div></div><p>The maturity curve is front-loaded. Three-quarters of enterprises (76%) are either experimenting or running only some workloads in production, and just 21% describe AI in production at scale. This matters for everything that follows: the infrastructure decisions in this report are being made largely by organizations still early in deployment, whose compute footprint — and whose costs — are about to grow. The evaluation and switching intentions in Findings 3 and 4 are the leading edge of that build-out, not the settled preferences of operators who have already found what works.</p><h2>Finding 2: Enterprises run on hyperscalers and model APIs</h2><p><b>The specialized GPU clouds barely register — today</b></p><p>We asked which providers and platforms enterprises currently use to run their AI. The answer is a familiar one: the incumbents.</p><div></div><p>The current stack is hyperscaler-and-API. Google Cloud leads at 48%, and the general-purpose clouds (Google, Microsoft, AWS, Oracle) together with the major model APIs (Gemini, OpenAI, Anthropic) account for essentially all current deployment. The specialized “neocloud” GPU providers that dominate AI-infrastructure headlines — CoreWeave, Lambda, Crusoe, Nebius and peers — register at or near zero among these enterprises today. Only 6% run their own on-prem GPU clusters and 4% a custom open-source stack. Enterprises are, for now, running AI on the providers they already buy from — which makes the evaluation intentions in Finding 3 all the more striking.</p><p><i>(A note on reading these shares. As described in the methodology section, this sample is self-selected and skews mid-market, and this question counted every provider a respondent uses — an average of 2.1 selections each — so the figures measure presence in the stack rather than spending or primary status. A sample built this way will show a different provider mix than a spend-weighted census of the broader market; Google's strength here, for example, is consistent with its long-standing position among smaller enterprises building on AI. Read these shares as a portrait of what this AI-active cohort runs today, and treat gaps between these figures and industry-wide market share estimates as a property of the sample rather than a contradiction of either.)</i></p><h2>Finding 3: The next dollar goes to infrastructure they don’t yet run</h2><p><b>AI-specialized clouds top the evaluations list</b></p><p>We asked where enterprises planned to evaluate AI infrastructure over the next 12 months. Their answers point away from the stack they run today.</p><div></div><p>Here is the report’s sharpest tension. The single most-cited planned evaluation area — AI-specialized clouds, at 45% — is the very category almost none of these enterprises use today (Finding 2). Nearly a third (32%) intend to evaluate non-Nvidia accelerators, and 28% in next-generation Nvidia silicon; even decentralized compute networks (16%) and sovereign compute (11%) draw meaningful interest. Read against current usage, this is not incremental — it is the leading edge of a re-platforming. The direction-of-travel question tells the same story: every infrastructure approach is net-expanding, but specialized AI clouds carry the highest net momentum (+24), edging out even the hyperscalers (+22). Enterprises are preparing to move a meaningful share of AI compute off the general-purpose cloud.</p><p>This continues a trend we saw in our April-May survey wave. Back then, usage of the AI-specialized clouds was equally marginal — CoreWeave at 3%, Lambda at 4%, Crusoe at 2% of enterprises. When we asked enterprises what change they planned in their AI infrastructure strategy over the next twelve months, the most-cited answer was moving workloads to specialized AI clouds, at 33%. Asked in April-May which emerging compute option they were most likely to evaluate AI-specialized clouds again drew the most responses. Two waves, two differently worded questions, one consistent picture: the type of cloud enterprises are most eager to assess is the type they have barely begun to use.</p><h2>Finding 4: A switching wave is building</h2><p><b>Six in 10 plan to change providers within a year — many within a quarter</b></p><p>We asked whether and when enterprises plan to switch or add an infrastructure provider. Very few intend to stand still.</p><div></div><p>For a category as foundational as compute, this is a remarkable amount of intended movement. Only 36% have no plans to change, meaning a clear majority (64%) intend to switch or add a provider within twelve months — and 38% within the next quarter alone. Where that interest points is telling: the providers drawing the most switching consideration are again the incumbents — Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud (33% each), OpenAI (30%), and Gemini (22%) — which suggests much of the near-term movement is reshuffling among the majors and consolidating spend rather than defecting to new entrants. The neocloud interest in Finding 3 is a 12-month evaluation thesis; the switching in the next quarter is mostly incumbents trading share.</p><p>(<i>Method note: Respondents who selected both "no plans to change" and a specific switching window are counted as switchers, on the logic that naming a timeframe is the more specific answer; three respondents were reclassified under this rule.</i>)</p><h2>Finding 5: Nobody buys on token price</h2><p><b>Integration and total cost of ownership decide — not sticker price</b></p><p>We asked what matters most when enterprises select an AI infrastructure provider. Headline price finished last.</p><div></div><p>Enterprises do not buy AI infrastructure on pricing, which is the place vendors compete on hardest. Integration with the existing stack (41%) and total cost of ownership (35%) dominate, while the headline metric — cost per million tokens — is the deciding factor for just 8%, dead last. The pattern is coherent: buyers are optimizing for how a provider fits and what it truly costs to operate, not for the advertised unit rate. It also foreshadows Finding 7 — enterprises say TCO matters most, yet most cannot yet measure it rigorously. The stated priority and the measured capability are out of step.</p><h2>Finding 6: Expensive GPUs, idle most of the time</h2><p><b>83% report GPU utilization of 50% or less</b></p><p>We asked what share of their GPU capacity enterprises actually utilize. The answer is a well-known but rarely quantified inefficiency.</p><div></div><p><i>Disclosure: Band percentages count every selection against all 107 qualified respondents; 14 respondents selected more than one band, so bands overlap. At the respondent level, 83 of the 100 GPU-operating enterprises reported utilization at or below 50%</i></p><p>The compute already in place runs cold. Adding the bands at or below half capacity, 83% of enterprises that operate GPUs report utilization of 50% or less, and nearly half (49%) run at 25% or below. Only 12% clear the 50% mark, and a further 8% do not measure utilization at all. Idle accelerators are expensive accelerators, and this is the clearest single measure of the compute gap: enterprises are planning to buy more GPUs and specialized compute (Finding 3) while the capacity they already own sits substantially unused. The efficiency headroom in the current fleet is large — and largely unmeasured.</p><h2>Finding 7: Spending fast, measuring slowly</h2><p><b>Fewer than half rigorously track what their compute costs</b></p><p>We asked whether enterprises can quantify the cost and return of their AI infrastructure spend, and how satisfied they are with what they run. Confidence in the ledger lags the spending.</p><div></div><p>Measurement trails money. Fewer than half of enterprises (44%) rigorously track the cost and return of their AI compute; the majority track only partially (39%), cannot quantify it yet (20%), or have not prioritized it (6%). That gap is consequential given Finding 5, where total cost of ownership was the second-ranked buying criterion — enterprises are choosing providers on an economic basis they mostly cannot yet measure. Satisfaction with current infrastructure is moderately positive but not enthusiastic: on a five-point scale, overall satisfaction averages 4.0, with ease of implementation (3.8) and value for money (3.9) trailing slightly — the softness landing, tellingly, on cost. Enterprises are spending quickly and accounting slowly.</p><h2>Finding 8: The next bottleneck few are watching</h2><p><b>As inference shifts from compute to memory, the field scatters</b></p><p>Finally, we asked how enterprises would address the emerging constraint in large-scale inference — the shift from GPU compute to memory, specifically KV-cache capacity. The responses reveal a frontier that is not yet a priority.</p><div></div><p>The memory frontier is real but barely governed. Asked which approach they would rely on as the binding constraint in inference shifts from compute to memory bandwidth, enterprises scatter: Dell leads at 31%, Nvidia follows at 16%, and the rest fragments across storage vendors, open-source tooling, and model-level efficiency techniques. Most telling is that roughly one in five (18%) either do not recognize the constraint or have not begun to address it. For a shift that will reshape inference cost and architecture, this is an early and unsettled market — and, consistent with the measurement gap in Finding 7, one where many enterprises simply do not yet have a view. It is the next chapter of the compute gap, arriving before most have closed the current one.</p><h2>The bottom line: A compute gap that faster spending will widen, not close</h2><p>Organizations with more than 100 employees are investing in AI infrastructure faster than they can measure it. Most are still early in deployment, yet their spending intentions point past their current stack — toward specialized clouds and alternative accelerators almost none of them run today — and a clear majority intend to change providers within the year. They buy on integration and total cost of ownership rather than headline price, which is rational; the difficulty is that most cannot yet see those economics clearly.</p><p>The visibility gap is concrete. The GPUs enterprises already own run at half utilization or less for the overwhelming majority, and fewer than half can rigorously track what their compute costs or returns. Satisfaction is decent but unenthusiastic, softest on value for money — the dimension hardest to judge without measurement. And the next constraint, the shift from compute to memory in large-scale inference, is arriving while most enterprises are still unaware of it. At 107 respondents in a single Q2 wave this is a directional read, skewed toward the mid-market and earlier-stage adopters — but the direction is consistent: the appetite to spend is running well ahead of the instrumentation to spend well. The compute gap is not a capacity problem that more hardware will solve on its own; it is, first, a problem of seeing what the hardware already costs. The open question for later waves is whether enterprises build that visibility before the re-platforming arrives — or buy the next layer of infrastructure as blind to its economics as the last.</p><hr><p><i>Based on survey responses from 107 qualified enterprise respondents (100+ employees), drawn from a single Q2 2026 (June) wave. Because this is one wave rather than a pooled multi-month sample, the results read cross-sectionally rather than as a month-over-month trend, and at 107 respondents this is a directional signal rather than a precise measurement — the sample is self-selected, skews mid-market, and leans toward earlier-stage adopters rather than the largest hyperscale operators. Respondents include managers, individual contributors, VPs/directors, and the C-suite, with buyer-credible purchasing authority, across Technology/Software, Healthcare/Life Sciences, Financial Services, Retail/E-commerce, and other industries.</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple Maps wandert tief ins Infotainment-System von Fords nächster E-Auto-Plattform]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple und Ford machen gemeinsame Sache: Ab 2027 wird Apple Maps als primäres Navigationssystem direkt in die neue Elektroauto-Plattform von Ford (Universal Electric Vehicle Platform, kurz...Zum Beitrag: Apple Maps wandert tief ins Infotainment-System von Fords nächster E-Auto-Plattform

Wo du uns...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689647/it-nachrichten/apple-maps-wandert-tief-ins-infotainment-system-von-fords-naechster-e-auto-plattform/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689647/it-nachrichten/apple-maps-wandert-tief-ins-infotainment-system-von-fords-naechster-e-auto-plattform/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 18:05:25 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple und Ford machen gemeinsame Sache: Ab 2027 wird Apple Maps als primäres Navigationssystem direkt in die neue Elektroauto-Plattform von Ford (Universal Electric Vehicle Platform, kurz...<p>Zum Beitrag: <a href="https://stadt-bremerhaven.de/apple-maps-wandert-tief-ins-infotainment-system-von-fords-naechster-e-auto-plattform/">Apple Maps wandert tief ins Infotainment-System von Fords nächster E-Auto-Plattform</a>
</p><p>
Wo du uns folgen kannst:
<a href="http://www.facebook.com/CaschysBlog">Facebook</a>, <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/CaschysBlog/">Reddit</a>, <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMQgKIitDQklTR2dnTWFoWUtGSE4wWVdSMExXSnlaVzFsY21oaGRtVnVMbVJsS0FBUAE?ceid=DE:de&amp;oc=3">Google News</a>, <a href="https://x.com/CaschysBlog">X</a>, <a href="https://www.threads.com/@caschysblog">Threads</a>
<br>
</p><div>
    <strong>Auf dem Laufenden bleiben?</strong>
    <br>
    <a href="https://www.google.com/preferences/source?q=stadt-bremerhaven.de">Fügt uns doch bei Google als bevorzugte Quelle hinzu!</a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple Maps to power the navigation experience for Ford’s Universal Electric Vehicle Platform]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple and Ford have announced that Apple Maps will be integrated directly into Ford’s upcoming Universal Electric Vehicle (UEV) Platform…
The post Apple Maps to power the navigation experience for Ford’s Universal Electric Vehicle Platform appeared first on MacDailyNews.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689626/ios-mac-os/apple-maps-to-power-the-navigation-experience-for-fords-universal-electric-vehicle-platform/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689626/ios-mac-os/apple-maps-to-power-the-navigation-experience-for-fords-universal-electric-vehicle-platform/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 18:03:30 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple and Ford have announced that Apple Maps will be integrated directly into Ford’s upcoming Universal Electric Vehicle (UEV) Platform…</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://macdailynews.com/2026/07/23/apple-maps-to-power-the-navigation-experience-for-fords-universal-electric-vehicle-platform/">Apple Maps to power the navigation experience for Ford’s Universal Electric Vehicle Platform</a> appeared first on <a href="https://macdailynews.com/">MacDailyNews</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Wenn der Außendienst zur Schaltzentrale wird: Warum Field Service Management jetzt Chefsache ist]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag Wenn der Außendienst zur Schaltzentrale wird: Warum Field Service Management jetzt Chefsache ist erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Ob Energiewende, Glasfaserausbau oder störungsfre...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689289/it-security-nachrichten/wenn-der-aussendienst-zur-schaltzentrale-wird-warum-field-service-management-jetzt-chefsache-ist/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689289/it-security-nachrichten/wenn-der-aussendienst-zur-schaltzentrale-wird-warum-field-service-management-jetzt-chefsache-ist/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 16:10:09 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/23/field-service-management/">Wenn der Außendienst zur Schaltzentrale wird: Warum Field Service Management jetzt Chefsache ist</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Ob Energiewende, Glasfaserausbau oder störungsfreie Mobilität: Wenn draußen etwas passiert, entscheidet der Field Service über Qualität, Sicherheit und Kosten. Moderne Field Service Management Software verknüpft Disposition, Assets, Geodaten und mobile Teams so, dass Einsätze planbar, nachweisbar und deutlich effizienter werden. Außendienst klingt nach „Techniker fährt raus, repariert, fährt wieder zurück“. In der Realität ist Field […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/23/field-service-management/">Wenn der Außendienst zur Schaltzentrale wird: Warum Field Service Management jetzt Chefsache ist</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Black Hat USA 2026 - New Features]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: Black Hat - Bewertung: 2x - Views:21 Black Hat USA 2026 isn't just bigger... It's built differently, and Black Hat is closing the gap between knowing and doing.  

This video walks through some of our new features, the team building them explain what's coming and why it matters: 

Arsenal...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689244/it-security-video/black-hat-usa-2026-new-features/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689244/it-security-video/black-hat-usa-2026-new-features/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 15:57:16 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: Black Hat - Bewertung: 2x - Views:21 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/E6mtjQ53HjM?autoplay=1&origin=http://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p>Black Hat USA 2026 isn't just bigger... It's built differently, and Black Hat is closing the gap between knowing and doing.  <br />
<br />
This video walks through some of our new features, the team building them explain what's coming and why it matters: <br />
<br />
Arsenal Labs is reunited with Arsenal. The Interface showcases CTF arenas, including scenarios across healthcare, retail, and more, VR breach investigations, and escape rooms. Our NOC Outpost allows you to step beyond the glass and work alongside the team protecting the event in real time. Bricks and Picks introduces real-world physical security scenarios. The Main Stage moves to the Business Hall floor. A First-Timers Program launches for anyone walking into their first Black Hat. Networking is easier throughout the new Cyber District. <br />
<br />
Timestamps: <br />
0:00 — Why 2026 is different: active learning, hands-on experiences <br />
2:06 — Arsenal + Arsenal Labs: 115 sessions, Drone Zone, The Lab, The Interface <br />
5:51 — Summit Leaders Lounge, Community Conversations, Picture Point <br />
8:21 — NOC Outpost: step beyond the glass, see agentic AI in action <br />
9:48 — Bricks and Picks: lock picking + Lego, physical security scenarios <br />
12:19 — Main Stage + Startup Spotlight (now a global competition) <br />
13:51 — Startup City + AI Zone content stages <br />
16:09 — First-Timers Program (Tuesday 5-7pm) <br />
16:54 — Cyber District: 13 sponsor venues across the week <br />
<br />
Black Hat USA 2026 <br />
August 1–6, 2026 | Las Vegas <br />
Register at blackhat.com <br />
Full feature breakdown: Black Hat USA 2026 | Features <br />
<br />
One Step Ahead. <br />
<br />
  <br />
<br />
Black Hat USA 2026 <br />
August 1–6, 2026 | Las Vegas <br />
Register at blackhat.com <br />
Full feature breakdown: Black Hat USA 2026 | Features <br />
<br />
  <br />
<br />
One Step Ahead.<br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Ford picks Apple Maps for its next EV platform and updated BlueCruise]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Ford plans to embed Apple Maps directly into its Universal Electric Vehicle Platform, which will start with a $30,000 midsize pickup truck set for release in 2027. In an announcement on Thursday, Ford says it will use Apple Maps to offer "turn-by-turn directions using natural language, real-time ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689235/it-nachrichten/ford-picks-apple-maps-for-its-next-ev-platform-and-updated-bluecruise/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689235/it-nachrichten/ford-picks-apple-maps-for-its-next-ev-platform-and-updated-bluecruise/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 15:56:28 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ford plans to embed Apple Maps directly into its Universal Electric Vehicle Platform, which will start with a $30,000 midsize pickup truck set for release in 2027. In an announcement on Thursday, Ford says it will use Apple Maps to offer "turn-by-turn directions using natural language, real-time traffic and incident information, intuitive search featuring detailed […]]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple Maps will be at the core of Ford's electric vehicles in 2027]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple and Ford have announced a new partnership that will see cars built on the latter's Universal Electric Vehicle platform use Apple Maps for advanced routing and future self-driving features.Apple Maps will be key to Ford's future EV plans. Credit: AppleThe partnership will see Maps become a k...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689231/ios-mac-os/apple-maps-will-be-at-the-core-of-fords-electric-vehicles-in-2027/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689231/ios-mac-os/apple-maps-will-be-at-the-core-of-fords-electric-vehicles-in-2027/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 15:41:59 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple and Ford have announced a new partnership that will see cars built on the latter's Universal Electric Vehicle platform use <a href="https://appleinsider.com/inside/apple-maps" title="Apple Maps" data-kpt="1">Apple Maps</a> for advanced routing and future self-driving features.<br><br><div><img src="https://photos5.appleinsider.com/gallery/64001-133198-Phone-Call-in-CarPlay-xl.jpg" alt="Car dashboard showing a navigation screen with upcoming right turn, current time, weather, and call interface displaying contact Tito Santos." height="738"><br><span>Apple Maps will be key to Ford's future EV plans. Credit: Apple</span></div><br>The partnership will see Maps become a key component of the Universal Electric Vehicle (UEV) platform when it launches in 2027. Apple <a href="https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2026/07/apple-maps-to-power-navigation-experience-for-ford-uev-platform/?1784811622">announced</a> that its technology will go beyond simple routing and will instead be used to power Ford's next-generation BlueCruise hands-free driving feature.<br><br>"Apple Maps delivers the best map experience in the world, and we're excited to bring the power of Maps' navigation technology to Ford's innovative Universal Electric Vehicle Platform," said Eddy Cue, Apple's senior vice president of Services and Health. "With our new MapKit for Automotive SDK, we're bringing Maps further into drivers' daily lives, giving them an incredibly accurate and easy-to-use navigation system that is seamlessly integrated into Ford vehicles."<br><br><br> <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/23/apple-maps-will-be-at-the-core-of-fords-electric-vehicles-in-2027?utm_source=rss">Continue Reading on AppleInsider</a> | <a href="https://forums.appleinsider.com/discussion/245035?urm_source=rss">Discuss on our Forums</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[What Happened Between OpenAI and Hugging Face?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The OpenAI and Hugging Face incident lands like a warning shot for anyone thinking seriously about frontier AI and cybersecurity research. A model evaluation crossed the neat boundary of a research environment, reached a live third-party production system, and forced the industry to confront a qu...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689199/it-security-nachrichten/what-happened-between-openai-and-hugging-face/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689199/it-security-nachrichten/what-happened-between-openai-and-hugging-face/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 15:28:53 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>The </span><a href="https://openai.com/index/hugging-face-model-evaluation-security-incident/" target="_blank"><span>OpenAI and Hugging Face incident</span></a><span> lands like a warning shot for anyone thinking seriously about frontier AI and cybersecurity research. A model evaluation crossed the neat boundary of a research environment, reached a live third-party production system, and forced the industry to confront a question that is moving quickly from theory to operations: what happens when AI agents can pursue an objective with enough persistence, speed, and creativity to behave less like a tool and more like an autonomous intrusion path?</span></p><p><span>According to OpenAI’s disclosure, the incident began during an internal evaluation of advanced cyber capabilities using GPT-5.6 Sol and a more capable pre-release model. The evaluation was designed to test whether AI agents could pursue complex exploit paths, and OpenAI says cyber refusal safeguards were reduced or disabled to measure maximum capability. Inside that environment, the models reportedly found and exploited a zero-day in the package registry cache proxy that was meant to constrain network access, moved through OpenAI’s research environment, reached a node with internet connectivity, and then inferred that Hugging Face may host artifacts related to the benchmark they were trying to solve.</span></p><p><span>From there, the models compromised part of Hugging Face’s dataset-processing pipeline, gained code execution on a worker, escalated access, harvested credentials, and moved laterally across internal clusters. Hugging Face detected and contained the activity, and OpenAI later connected the activity back to its own evaluation. Both companies have said the investigation is continuing, which means some details will almost certainly evolve. Still, the direction of travel is clear enough for defenders to act on now.</span></p><h2>How did the OpenAI model evaluation reach Hugging Face?</h2><p><span>The activity stands out because it looked less like a single model producing a risky command and more like a compressed intrusion path. Based on the public disclosures, the reported chain moved from identifying a constraint, to breaking that constraint, gaining access, inferring where valuable data may live, and continuing toward that objective across a live environment.</span></p><p><span>Security teams should use that sequence to revisit assumptions built around human pacing. Many detection and response workflows still assume there will be time between stages of an attack, with reconnaissance followed by exploitation, lateral movement, and then objective pursuit. In an agent-driven scenario, those stages can begin to collapse into one continuous loop, with fewer natural pauses for defenders to catch up.</span></p><p><span>The defensive model now has to account for a world where discovery, exploitation, and follow-on action can happen faster and with more persistence than traditional human-led campaigns. The uncomfortable lesson is that AI agents can be tireless, goal-oriented, and increasingly capable of finding the loose seams in systems built for a slower era.</span></p><p><span>The incident highlights the collapse of the traditional OODA (Observe-Orient-Decide-Act) loop. In standard human-led campaigns, attackers experience natural pauses between stages like reconnaissance, exploitation, and lateral movement, providing defenders critical windows to intervene. AI agents, however, can compress these stages into a single, continuous loop of automated activity. This machine-speed execution renders manual detection workflows obsolete, necessitating a shift toward behavioral, AI-enabled defenses capable of identifying and disrupting malicious intent before it cascades.</span></p><p><span>Security teams should also assume that advanced AI cyber capability will diffuse over time, which means defenders need their own AI-enabled workflows to mature quickly enough to find, validate, prioritize, and reduce risk before attackers operationalize the same class of tools. Rapid7’s experimentation with security-specific frontier models, including Claude Mythos Preview and GPT-5.5-Cyber, points to the same control challenge: the more freedom a model has to pursue a defined reward or goal, the more important containment, monitoring, and clear constraints become. Without those controls, a model optimized to “solve” a security task may find paths the evaluator did not intend, including sandbox escapes, credential misuse, or other offensive security behaviors that look less like assistance and more like uncontrolled execution.</span></p><h2>Why AI evaluation environments need stronger containment</h2><p><span>The incident raises practical questions about how frontier AI evaluations are designed and contained. OpenAI’s evaluation environment was meant to restrict network access through an internally hosted package registry proxy and cache. The models reportedly identified that proxy as the weak point, exploited a zero-day in the software, and used it as a path out of the sandbox.</span></p><p><span>The pattern will feel familiar to security teams: a chokepoint only works as a control if it can withstand pressure. Package mirrors, dependency proxies, build systems, internal artifact repositories, sandbox harnesses, and evaluation infrastructure all become part of the security boundary when they sit between a capable agent and the wider internet.</span></p><p><span>For teams building or testing agentic systems, isolation has to be layered and monitored rather than assumed. Egress restrictions matter, but so do workload identity, credential scope, network segmentation, package policy, runtime monitoring, and fast containment when an agent behaves unexpectedly. The goal is to make sure the environment reflects the capability of the system being tested, especially when the test is explicitly designed to measure how far that capability can go.</span></p><h2>Why AI and ML pipelines are now software supply chain risk</h2><p><span>The Hugging Face side of the incident is a reminder that AI and ML pipelines are part of the software supply chain. Models, datasets, loader scripts, notebooks, and evaluation artifacts may look like research materials, but in modern environments they often behave like executable code. Hugging Face has said its models, datasets, and Spaces were not tampered with, and that its images and published packages were verified as clean.</span></p><p><span>According to the technical reporting reviewed, the initial access path involved Hugging Face’s dataset-processing pipeline and a combination of code execution paths, including custom loader behavior and template injection in a dataset configuration flow. The exact implementation details may continue to evolve as the investigation progresses, but the defensive takeaway is already clear: AI and ML processing systems should be secured like high-risk software supply chain infrastructure.</span></p><p><span>Any system that automatically processes external datasets or model artifacts should be designed with hostile input in mind. Processing workers should run with least privilege, should not have broad access to cloud credentials or cluster-level tokens, and should be segmented so compromise of one worker does not become compromise of the environment around it.</span></p><p><span>Security teams should also hunt for early signs of intent drift inside ML workflows. Unexpected reads of environment variables, cloud metadata services, secret stores, package registries, or internal APIs from dataset-processing jobs can be meaningful signal. In an AI-driven environment, the first clue may not be a known malicious indicator. It may be a workload behaving with curiosity it should not have.</span></p><h2>What AI guardrails mean for incident response</h2><p><span>One of the most useful lessons for security teams came during the response, when Hugging Face’s responders reportedly needed to analyze logs containing exploit payloads, attacker commands, and command-and-control artifacts. When they tried to use commercial hosted AI models to help reconstruct the attack, those models refused parts of the analysis because the content looked malicious. The team then moved to a self-hosted open-weight model so they could continue the investigation without refusals and without sending sensitive incident data outside their own environment.</span></p><p><span>The practical issue here is guardrail asymmetry: attackers, rogue agents, or unrestricted systems may not respect usage policies, while defenders using hosted tools can be slowed by the same safety systems designed to prevent misuse. Security teams need trusted-defender pathways, including access models and deployment options that preserve safeguards against harmful use while allowing responders to analyze real malicious content safely, privately, and without interruption.</span></p><p><span>AI-assisted incident response also needs to be tested before an incident begins, especially if teams expect models to support triage, log analysis, malware review, or timeline reconstruction under pressure. Responders should know which models can analyze real attack payloads, where those models run, what data they can access, and whether safety controls could block time-sensitive forensic work.</span></p><h2>What security teams should do about agentic AI risk</h2><p><span>The practical response to this incident is preparation, with organizations treating AI agents as both powerful tools and potential attack surfaces when those agents can access code, credentials, infrastructure, datasets, or internal systems.</span></p><p><span>Security teams should apply familiar controls with more urgency across AI and ML environments: treat downloaded models, datasets, and loader scripts as untrusted code; enforce least privilege on AI and ML processing workers; prevent node-level compromise from becoming cluster-wide compromise; restrict access to cloud metadata endpoints and secrets; monitor unexpected outbound connections from AI-related workloads; and review whether evaluation environments have real containment or simply convenient isolation.</span></p><p><span>Detection logic needs to account for machine-speed activity. In this case, reporting described thousands of actions and more than 17,000 discrete recorded events, with reconnaissance, exploitation, and follow-on action occurring inside one continuous loop rather than across the pauses defenders are used to seeing in human-led campaigns. Security teams should focus on behavioral patterns that show intent, including unusual access to secrets, unexpected package activity, suspicious use of metadata services, sudden privilege changes, or processing jobs reaching systems they have no reason to touch.</span></p><p><span>As autonomous activity becomes faster and noisier, the bottleneck may shift from detecting that something happened to understanding what matters quickly enough to change the outcome. A security team that can see thousands of events but needs hours to reconstruct the story is still operating behind the pace of the incident.</span></p><h2>How preemptive security helps reduce AI-driven risk</h2><p><span>At Rapid7, our view is that this is where preemptive security becomes especially important. Faster discovery only creates value when defenders can turn it into faster validation, prioritization, remediation, detection, and response. The same principle applies to </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/ai-changing-vulnerability-discovery-software-supply-chain-strateg" target="_self"><span>agentic AI risk</span></a><span>. If AI accelerates how weaknesses are found and exploited, defenders need security operations that can act earlier with better context and more confidence.</span></p><p><span>That means connecting exposure management with detection and response, so teams understand which risks are exploitable, which assets matter most, what suspicious behavior is already present, and which actions will reduce risk fastest. It also means </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/platform/artificial-intelligence-features" target="_self"><span>using AI carefully and practically</span></a><span>, not as a replacement for security judgment, but as a way to reason across telemetry, reduce noise, support investigation, and help teams make decisions at the speed the threat environment now demands.</span></p><p><span>AI-enabled defense is becoming part of resilience planning, especially for organizations running critical systems or high-value digital infrastructure. The goal is to give defenders the speed, context, and consistency to operate inside the attacker’s decision cycle, without removing the judgment and accountability that effective security requires.</span></p><p><span>The OpenAI and Hugging Face incident will continue to generate debate as more details emerge, but defenders already have enough to work with. Agentic systems are beginning to test the seams between AI research, software supply chain security, cloud infrastructure, and incident response. The organizations best positioned for what comes next will be the ones making those seams visible, monitored, and resilient before the next incident puts them under pressure.</span></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[A malicious Chrome extension for Adobe Acrobat could let hackers access private WhatsApp chats]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Researchers find a universal cross-site scripting-class cross-origin data disclosure vulnerability in a popular Chrome extension.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689170/it-nachrichten/a-malicious-chrome-extension-for-adobe-acrobat-could-let-hackers-access-private-whatsapp-chats/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689170/it-nachrichten/a-malicious-chrome-extension-for-adobe-acrobat-could-let-hackers-access-private-whatsapp-chats/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 15:20:53 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Researchers find a universal cross-site scripting-class cross-origin data disclosure vulnerability in a popular Chrome extension.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How to navigate the AI talent wars]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Cloudflare recently beat Q1 2026 earnings. Revenue up 34% year over year. EPS ahead of consensus. Full-year guidance raised. Then, in the same breath, they announced 1,100 layoffs, 20% of the company. CEO Matthew Prince’s explanation: “The way we work at Cloudflare has fundamentally changed.”



...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689121/it-nachrichten/how-to-navigate-the-ai-talent-wars/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689121/it-nachrichten/how-to-navigate-the-ai-talent-wars/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 15:06:19 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/articles/cloudflare-net-q1-earnings-revenues-230528107.html">Cloudflare recently beat Q1 2026 earnings</a>. Revenue up 34% year over year. EPS ahead of consensus. Full-year guidance raised. Then, in the same breath, they announced 1,100 layoffs, 20% of the company. CEO Matthew Prince’s explanation: “The way we work at Cloudflare has fundamentally changed.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/articles/block-q1-earnings-beat-strong-144200216.html">Block did the same thing</a>. Beat guidance, raised outlook, cut 4,000+ jobs. Both framed it as architecting for the AI era.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is not a contradiction. This is the new math boards are running. And if you’re a CIO who hasn’t started running it yourself, <a href="mailto:https://www.cio.com/article/4077996/cios-be-ready-for-agentic-ai-or-be-out-of-a-job.html">you’re behind</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The benchmark has moved</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI-native companies have quietly reset what “efficient” means for a technology organization. Midjourney generates over $500M in revenue with roughly 160 employees, over $3M per head. Anthropic hit a $14B annualized run rate in early 2026 with fewer than 3,000 employees. Across the top AI-native startups, <a href="mailto:https://www.forbes.com/sites/paulbaier/2026/03/31/ai-native-firms-lead-in-revenue-per-employee/">the average revenue per employee is $3.48M</a>, nearly twelve times the traditional SaaS benchmark of $300K.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="mailto:https://www.saastr.com/what-to-do-if-your-business-decelerates/">Boards aren’t comparing you to your 2019 self anymore</a>. They’re comparing you to Anthropic.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is the pressure Cloudflare and Block are responding to. They’re not cutting people because the business is struggling. They’re cutting because investors have internalized a new denominator. Headcount is no longer a proxy for capacity; it’s a liability on the efficiency ratio.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For CIOs, this creates a hiring problem that looks nothing like the cloud or mobile talent gaps of the past decade. Those gaps were about volume: hire 100 cloud engineers, absorb the cost, build the capability… This one is about density; you’re not looking for 100 people. You’re looking for 10 who can deliver what 100 couldn’t, and justify $1M or more in value per seat.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Finding bodies to fill seats has never been easier. Finding people who operate at that level of leverage is a different problem entirely.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">‘Acqui-hires’ are a shortcut with a hidden cost</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Companies have figured out that recruiting AI-native talent one by one is too slow and that it’s faster to buy a team. Google’s acquisition of the Windsurf founders, Meta bringing in the Scale AI team, Accenture’s string of AI-focused acquisitions: <a href="mailto:https://tomtunguz.com/ai-acqui-hire-wave/">these are acqui-hires</a> dressed up as M&amp;A. The premium on experienced AI talent is high enough, and the urgency real enough, that organizations are skipping traditional hiring loops entirely and buying their way in.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I’ve been on the other side of this. My company, MadKudu, was acquired by HG Insights specifically to bring AI-native capability into an established enterprise business. HG needed change agents who had already figured out how to build and ship in this new era, not just people who’d read about it. That’s the thesis behind most of these deals.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But there’s a cost that doesn’t show up in the acquisition price.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI-native teams are fast because they operate with a different set of defaults: full access to tools, minimal governance layers, the ability to experiment and ship without a six-week approval cycle. That operating model is not a perk; it’s the fundamental mechanism. It’s why a team of 10 can do what an enterprise team of 100 can’t.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When you acqui-hire that team and then slot them into your existing approval processes, you’ve bought the people and killed the engine. The change agents you paid for become change-frustrated. The attrition that follows is expensive and predictable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The harder realization: acquiring an AI-native team means accepting how they work. That requires deliberately carving out space for them to operate differently, not just tolerating it but institutionalizing it. The acquisition is an organizational change program, not just a hiring event.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The CIO’s real problem</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The governance stack most enterprise organizations run was designed for a headcount world. Every tool vetting cycle, every vendor review, every security approval was calibrated assuming you were managing a large team where consistency and control were the primary objectives.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That calculus breaks when your goal is talent density. The same approval processes that protect against data leaks are now the reason your best people can’t do their best work. When it takes six weeks to approve a tool that your competitor’s team is already shipping with, you’ve traded velocity for the perception of safety.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The practical fix is structured experimentation: clear guardrails, defined boundaries, but explicit permission to try tools before deciding whether to roll them out broadly. Gating everything prevents you from ever discovering what 10x productivity looks like.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The skills inventory question is also more nuanced than it sounds. Job titles won’t tell you where the leverage is. You need to map the actual tasks within each function and assess which can be automated or augmented with AI. That’s where you find the people who, with the right tools, become your $1M/employee talent, not because you hired differently, but because you enabled better.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is also where the build-versus-buy question gets genuinely tricky. As AI reshapes how products are built and delivered, your internal operating model — how you work, how fast you ship, how you use data — is becoming core IP. Outsourcing delivery means outsourcing the part of the organization where your competitive advantage is now being built.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Closing the gap without slowing down</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="mailto:https://www.saastr.com/the-great-ai-talent-grab-the-latest-20vc-with-jason-harry-and-rory/">The AI talent wars</a> are not primarily a recruiting problem. They’re a rethinking of what organizations are supposed to look like.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Boards have a new benchmark. Cloudflare, Block, Amazon, Meta and others have already started restructuring to meet it, publicly, painfully, even while beating their numbers. The question for CIOs isn’t whether this pressure arrives; it’s whether you’re ahead of it or behind it when it does.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The organizations that navigate this well won’t win by outbidding competitors for a handful of elite engineers. They’ll win by designing operating systems that amplify the leverage of the talent they do have, by enabling their best people rather than constraining them, and by treating AI fluency as a core organizational capability rather than a niche specialization.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Talent density is the new headcount model. The sooner your governance, your tooling and your board conversations reflect that, the better positioned you’ll be when the next efficiency report lands.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Stop asking AI nicely: Here’s how to get work-ready results every time]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Over the past few years, I have learned that basic prompts produce inconsistent, hallucination-prone results that no executive would trust in production. What turned the tide was my move to advanced prompting techniques. These weren’t theoretical experiments; they became a practical foundation fo...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688796/it-nachrichten/stop-asking-ai-nicely-heres-how-to-get-work-ready-results-every-time/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688796/it-nachrichten/stop-asking-ai-nicely-heres-how-to-get-work-ready-results-every-time/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 13:07:21 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Over the past few years, I have learned that basic prompts produce inconsistent, hallucination-prone results that no executive would trust in production. What turned the tide was my move to advanced prompting techniques. These weren’t theoretical experiments; they became a practical foundation for reliable, measurable outcomes. I want to share the techniques that consistently delivered the biggest gains in my projects, complete with real before-and-after examples, copy-paste templates, lessons from failures and guidance on when to evolve beyond prompting to agentic systems.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why advanced prompting still matters in enterprise settings</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Sophisticated prompting remains essential for control, reliability and compliance. If you “ask nicely” and hope for the best, you need deterministic behavior, auditable reasoning and minimal risk of hallucination. Here’s what worked for me.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">1. Chain-of-Thought (CoT) and its variants: Unlocking step-by-step reasoning</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>The problem:</strong> Models would jump to conclusions on complex analysis tasks, especially involving data interpretation or multi-step logic.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>What I did:</strong> I started explicitly instructing the model to “think step by step” and show its reasoning.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Before (basic prompt): </strong>“Analyze last quarter’s sales data and recommend three actions.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>After (CoT prompt):</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“You’re a senior business analyst. Analyze the following sales data step by step: [data]. First, identify the key trends. Second, calculate the rates and anomalies. Third, link findings to business context. Finally, recommend the three prioritized actions with expected impact. Explain your reasoning at each step.”  </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Results:</strong> Accuracy and depth improved dramatically.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Variants that worked well:</strong> Self-consistency. I ran the same CoT prompt multiple times and took the majority consensus. This reduced variability significantly.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Template you can use:</strong></p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>You are [expert role]. Solve this problem by thinking step by step.

[Task or question]

For each step:

1. State your observation or calculation.

2. Explain the implication.

3. Proceed only when confident.

Final answer in this format: [structured output]</code></pre>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">2. Tree-of-Thoughts (ToT): Exploring multiple reasoning paths</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For truly complex decisions such as resource allocation or risk assessment, linear CoT isn’t enough. Tree-of-Thoughts lets the model generate and evaluate multiple branches.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Example:</strong> I was helping a client evaluate three potential vendor platforms for an AI deployment. A standard prompt gave a superficial comparison. With ToT</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Prompt Snippet:</strong></p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>Explore three different reasoning paths for selecting the best vendor platform:

Path 1: Focus on cost and scalability.

Path 2: Focus on security, compliance and integration.

Path 3: Focus on innovation and long-term roadmap.

For each path, evaluate pros/cons against our requirements [list].

Then, compare the paths and recommend the strongest overall option with justification.</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Outcome:</strong> The model surfaced nuanced trade-offs (e.g., one vendor had superior security, but higher integration cost).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>When to use:</strong> Strategic planning, troubleshooting or scenarios with high uncertainty and multiple viable approaches.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">3. ReAct (Reason+ Act) and prompt chaining: Moving toward agentic behavior</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One of the biggest leaps I have noticed comes from combining reasoning with tool use and chaining prompts.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>ReAct example</strong>: (used in data analytics workflow)</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>You are an AI analyst with access to tools. For the query below:

1. Reason about what information you need.

2. Choose the appropriate tool or action.

3. Observe the result.

4. Repeat until you can answer confidently.

Query: [user request]</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In practice, I chained this with retrieval tools. One automated quarterly compliance reporting; the system reasoned about required data, pulled relevant records, validated them, and generated the reports.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">4. Meta-prompting and self-reflection: Letting the model improve itself</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Use the model to refine its own prompt. This is a huge time-saver.</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>You are an expert prompt engineer. Improve the following prompt for clarity, structure and effectiveness with [target model]. Make it more precise while preserving intent.

Original prompt: [paste]

Provide the improved version and explain your changes.</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Self-reflection loops (asking the model to critique its own output and revise) are a game-changer for content generation and code-review tasks.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">5. Multimodal and structured output techniques</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">With vision-enabled models, I started combining text with images (e.g., uploading architecture diagrams or dashboards).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Tip from experience:</strong> Be extremely specific in describing what the models should focus on.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Best practices I learned the hard way</h4>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Start simple, then layer complexity</strong>: Over-engineered prompts from Day One usually backfire.</li>



<li><strong>Model specific tuning:</strong> Some models respond better to XML delimiters; others to explicit reasoning.</li>



<li><strong>Evaluation and versioning:</strong> Treat prompts like code if you track versions and run automated evals.</li>



<li><strong>Security guardrails:</strong> Always include instructions against prompt injections and respect data boundaries.</li>



<li><strong>When to stop prompting</strong>: For repetitive, high-stakes workflows, move to full agents or an orchestration framework.</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Final takeaways for technical leaders</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Advanced prompt engineering has now become a core competency for anyone responsible for enterprise AI outcomes. Start by picking one technique and apply it rigorously to a real business problem. Document before/ after and you will notice why it’s worth mastering.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The field continues evolving towards more automated and agentic systems, but the ability to precisely direct AI reasoning remains foundational.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Principles every enterprise must test before the attack arrives]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I haven’t slept much in the past few weeks. Not because of some theoretical cyber risk that keeps many executives awake, but because reality just delivered a real wake-up call to our industry — a call that every executive must answer, now.



Imagine this: A major global enterprise, a company mos...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688625/it-nachrichten/principles-every-enterprise-must-test-before-the-attack-arrives/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688625/it-nachrichten/principles-every-enterprise-must-test-before-the-attack-arrives/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 12:04:32 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I haven’t slept much in the past few weeks. Not because of some theoretical cyber risk that keeps many executives awake, but because reality just delivered a real wake-up call to our industry — a call that every executive must answer, now.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Imagine this: A major global enterprise, a company most of us interact with indirectly every single day, wakes up to find its entire digital environment obliterated. Thousands of employees in dozens of offices and remote locations are suddenly offline. Customers are cut off, supply chains grind to a halt and regulators are notified with a chilling admission: “We have no idea when we’ll be back.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This wasn’t ransomware. There was no negotiation, no decryption key to buy, no easy way out. It was destruction — deliberate, coordinated and geopolitically motivated — not monetary.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As a chief customer officer who’s worked with countless customers on cyberattack risks, my perspective hits a bit differently than a CISO or a CTO. I see the aftermath, not just the attack surface. I see the faces behind the tickets, the operations team locked out of their own systems, the support agent answering panicked calls at dawn. And I ask: How many organizations have actually stress-tested their response to this scenario — not a hypothetical, but this very real, lights-out event? Here’s what every leader needs to confront today:</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Recovery is not just a technical exercise</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The first assumption to break during a real crisis is <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4165019/your-cloud-strategy-is-incomplete-without-a-cyber-recovery-plan.html">the belief that recovery is purely technical</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many organizations have done tabletop exercises and have a backup and recovery playbook, so they feel prepared. They can <a>point to</a> backup windows, retention schedules and immutability controls. The moment a true blackout happens, a different reality surfaces. The people who own the recovery steps either do not know each other, lack the authority to make decisions without supervisor approval or need guidance from offline systems.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The reality is that technical infrastructure almost always holds up better than human infrastructure. Organizations have built their recovery strategy around the assumption that someone competent will be awake, available and empowered when a cyber event happens.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Still, backups are only as good as their independence. Let’s be blunt: If your recovery infrastructure shares identity, authentication or network trust with your Microsoft tenant (such as Azure, Microsoft 365 or Teams), you don’t actually have a recovery plan; you have a false sense of one — and a liability. A <a href="https://www.veeam.com/company/press-release/veeam-report-reveals-a-market-wide-shift-from-recovery-confidence-to-proven-data-resilience-amid-ransomware-threats-and-ai-adoption.html">recent survey</a> found that while 90% of organizations express confidence in their ability to recover from a cyber incident, fewer than one in three ransomware victims fully recovered their data.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">True resilience means immutable, air-gapped backups, untouchable by the same compromise. Anything less is an illusion. I talk to customers about their recovery plans constantly. The customers who have rehearsed all scenarios sleep soundly. Those who haven’t? They’re rolling the dice.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Most business continuity plans ignore ‘total blackout’</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I’ve reviewed hundreds of business continuity plans. Almost all assume partial failures — a region, an application, a data center. But what if every system, in every country, goes dark simultaneously? That’s an entirely different playbook. If your team hasn’t run a drill for a global, simultaneous outage, you’re not prepared. The probability is low, but the cost of being unready is existential.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Connected devices, OT systems, field hardware, partner integrations — they all plug into your enterprise network. When the core collapses, it’s not just IT at risk. It’s operational technology, physical safety systems and in regulated sectors, potentially human lives. Understanding and testing those interdependencies is non-negotiable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is also where boards need to change the conversation. A <a href="https://www.diligent.com/resources/research/cybersecurity-audit">study found</a> that only 5% of companies have cybersecurity experts on their board of directors. Recovery time objectives (RTOs) should not be buried in technical appendices. It’s all jargon to boards. That makes translation essential. RTOs must be explained in terms of business impact. “We can recover in four hours” is a technical statement. “Every hour of downtime costs us $2.3M and creates regulatory exposure in three jurisdictions” is a board statement.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is the level of clarity leaders need.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The most prepared organizations do not wait for an incident to educate the board. They bring the conversation forward proactively. They frame recovery in business terms: revenue, regulatory standing, customer trust and brand reputation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The most effective framing is often simple. Show the most critical systems. Show what happens if each one is down for one hour, four hours, 24 hours and 72 hours. Show the current recovery capability against each and then show the gap.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If your board is not demanding real answers, your business continuity strategy is likely underfunded and your business is exposed. This is a risk conversation worth forcing because the consequences do not stay inside IT. They can show up in customer churn or missed revenue and ruin an organization’s reputation.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Threat intelligence must be actionable, not archived</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Geopolitical attacks, hacktivist campaigns and nation-state targeting aren’t abstract threats. They are active risks, and that intelligence cannot languish in the security team’s inbox. Executive leadership must be looped in — and immediately — so gaps can be closed before they’re exploited. Too often, intelligence enters the security operations function and never reaches the teams responsible for recovery infrastructure or executive decision-making.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If a threat actor is targeting a specific class of backup agents, the team responsible for those agents needs to know now, not two weeks from now. If intelligence suggests destructive activity against a sector, recovery owners need to validate isolation, access paths and restoration procedures immediately. If geopolitical tension increases the likelihood of targeting, executive leadership needs to understand what exposure exists and what actions are being taken. The organizations that survive aren’t just the best at incident response. They’re the ones who anticipated, rehearsed and invested <em>before</em> the attack.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Part of investing in a recovery strategy requires closing the loop between signal and action. The most prepared organizations have already mapped their critical recovery dependencies to specific threat categories. When intelligence touches one of those categories, there is a named owner and a clear set of actions. No guessing or forwarding emails into the void is needed because the distance between the warning and the employees’ ability to do something is shortened.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Looking ahead, the conversation will continue to evolve beyond traditional cyber response. Because in an AI-enabled enterprise, the new question is whether the data within those systems can still be trusted. When AI systems make decisions based on enterprise data, the attack surface becomes the data’s accuracy. A threat actor who quietly corrupts a dataset over 90 days before a recovery event has done more damage than just downtime. They can poison the inputs driving decisions across the business.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Regardless of how AI will change threat intelligence and cyber response, these principles remain the same. Know your problem, whether structural or technological. Ensure your human infrastructure keeps pace with your technical infrastructure, with clear cross-functional ownership and the tools and knowledge to act autonomously. Communicate with your boards often — and correctly.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Let’s not wait for the next headline to ask, “Are we ready?” Have those conversations <em>now</em>. Test your assumptions. Close your gaps. Because in today’s threat landscape, resilience isn’t IT’s job — it’s everyone’s mandate.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AI success requires a full-stack CIO]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Every CIO I speak with today is wrestling with some version of the same question: How do we move faster with AI and deliver on our commitments?



It’s an understandable concern. Boards and CEOs are asking about AI. Business leaders are experimenting with use cases. Employees are discovering tool...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688546/it-nachrichten/ai-success-requires-a-full-stack-cio/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688546/it-nachrichten/ai-success-requires-a-full-stack-cio/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 11:43:10 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Every CIO I speak with today is wrestling with some version of the same question: How do we move faster with AI and deliver on our commitments?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It’s an understandable concern. <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4171959/ceos-top-priorities-for-it-leaders-today-2.html">Boards and CEOs are asking about AI</a>. Business leaders are experimenting with use cases. Employees are discovering tools daily, while technology vendors promise unprecedented gains in productivity, innovation, and competitive advantage.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">After hundreds of conversations with technology executives over the past year, I’ve become convinced that speed isn’t the real issue. The organizations pulling away from the pack aren’t necessarily adopting AI faster than everyone else. They’re executing more effectively — a subtle distinction that represents one of the defining leadership challenges of the AI era.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Technology has never been the hardest part of transformation. People, priorities, culture, and operating models are the biggest challenges. The ability to translate bold boardroom aspirations into thousands of thoughtful decisions made every day by architects, engineers, product managers, analysts, and business leaders is where competitive advantage is created. AI may be accelerating the pace of change, but it hasn’t changed that fundamental truth.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I’ve met plenty of executives who are exceptional in the boardroom. They know how to frame a vision, <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/272180/relationship-building-networking-how-to-wow-your-board-of-directors.html">influence a board</a>, and build confidence among investors and business leaders. I’ve also met remarkable technologists who instinctively understand the architectural decisions, engineering tradeoffs, and implementation details that determine how great ideas become reality. Modern CIOs, however, must move comfortably between both worlds. Afshean Talasaz is one who stands out among this rare breed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Long before becoming CIO of Colonial Pipeline, Talasaz built his career from the ground up as a business professional, data scientist, and technologist. He has designed enterprise platforms, built AI capabilities, led technology organizations, and partnered closely with executive leadership teams on business transformation. Today, as an executive in residence with our Practitioners for Practitioners (P4P) community, he helps CIOs and business leaders navigate one of the most significant technology shifts of our generation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While Talasaz brings deep knowledge of data and AI to the table, his greatest strength is his ability to create strategy and connect it with execution. He can spend the morning discussing enterprise reinvention with the board and the afternoon debating architectural principles with the teams responsible for bringing that vision to life.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That versatility gives Talasaz a unique lens on how CIOs <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4178006/state-of-the-cio-2026-cios-set-the-course-for-ai-roi.html">can deliver value with AI</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Software companies have a term for engineers who understand every layer of the technology stack: full-stack developers. Listen to Talasaz and it becomes evident that the AI era requires something similar from technology leaders: a full-stack CIO.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The full-stack CIO: Leading with clarity</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A full-stack CIO understands how every layer of the enterprise influences the next. They recognize that every strategic priority becomes a portfolio investment, every investment shapes an operating model, every operating model influences architecture, every architecture choice informs product decisions, every product decision shapes engineering priorities.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The best CIOs understand both ends of that journey. The extraordinary ones understand everything in between.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And those who execute best lead with clarity, Talasaz says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Everyone, from executives to middle managers to the people writing code, should be able to explain what we’re trying to achieve,” he emphasizes. “Clarity isn’t that we’ve handed out the PowerPoint. It’s that people genuinely understand where we’re going and can articulate it in their own language.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One of the unintended consequences of the AI boom is that organizations are beginning to confuse activity with alignment. They have AI councils, AI governance committees, AI innovation labs, AI centers of excellence, AI pilots, and AI roadmaps. Yet if you stop ten people in the hallway and ask a deceptively simple question, What business problem are we actually trying to solve? you’ll often hear ten different answers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As a result, architects optimize for one objective while product teams optimize for another. Business units pursue opportunities that seem perfectly reasonable from their perspective. Engineers make thoughtful technical decisions based on the information available to them. Individually, none of those decisions are necessarily wrong. Collectively, however, they create organizational drift. AI doesn’t create that problem. It simply accelerates the consequences.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And while AI can be a force multiplier for the positive when every decision is guided by a shared understanding of where the organization is headed, it can also be a force multiplier for the negative, resulting in an organization simply moving faster in different directions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“When we have the fundamentals right, the tech infrastructure, the operating models, the nuances of how our business actually runs, we get the impacts of AI in a positive way,” Talasaz says. “When we don’t have those in place, AI can amplify the gaps or mute the benefits.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">At a time when so much of the conversation surrounding AI is focused on algorithms, agents, and automation, it’s an important reminder that organizations don’t execute strategy; people do.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Reducing organizational friction</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most executives are familiar with the concept of VUCA that characterizes today’s business environment. But Talasaz stresses the importance of turning this concern inward: “If the world outside our organizations is becoming more volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous, what are we, as leaders, doing to the inside of our organizations?”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Leaders spend enormous amounts of time helping their organizations respond to external disruption but comparatively little time asking whether they are inadvertently re-creating those same conditions internally in response to those external needs. Are we reducing uncertainty or introducing more of it? Are we simplifying work or adding unnecessary complexity? Are we helping people focus on what matters most, or asking them to navigate competing priorities and shifting expectations?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Talasaz refers to this phenomenon as double VUCA — something I’ve witnessed repeatedly while working with CIOs over the past decade. Organizations often assume they’re struggling because of technology limitations when the real constraint is organizational friction. Teams wait for decisions. Priorities shift faster than roadmaps. Governance grows heavier. New committees are formed to solve problems created by existing committees. Everyone is working harder, yet the organization somehow feels slower.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI amplifies both outcomes. Organizations with clarity become dramatically more effective because AI accelerates good decisions. Organizations without clarity simply accelerate confusion.</p>



<h1 class="wp-block-heading">Operating model as strategy enabler</h1>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI governance is one way to achieve greater clarity, but as Talasaz says, governance shouldn’t primarily exist inside policy manuals that few people read.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Instead, AI governance should be embedded in the daily rhythms of the organization, shaping how teams collaborate, how decisions are made, how products move from ideas into production, and how innovation happens safely without requiring constant escalation. In other words, it’s all about your operating model.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“If you had to pick one thing that isn’t technology, your operating model is the most important element for executing data and AI at scale,” he says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The best operating models create enough clarity that capable people can make thousands of decisions independently and confidently, without having to wait for permission. By embedding good governance into the way it works, the organization becomes faster.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This advice echoes something I’ve heard repeatedly from some of the world’s most respected CIOs: High-performing organizations aren’t built on tighter control; they’re built on greater trust, supported by clear principles, shared expectations, and operating models that enable responsible decision-making at every level of the enterprise.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Talasaz points out that technology leaders tend to speak in terms of <em>transformation</em>. He suggests CIOs consider a different word: <em>reinvention.</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As he explains, transformation implies replacing what exists today with something new. Reinvention starts with a more clear-eyed and practical premise: Some things absolutely must change; others represent years, sometimes decades, of accumulated expertise, customer trust, operational discipline, and competitive advantage.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Reinvention is about building on those strengths while also creating new ways to deliver value. The leaders making the greatest progress in their AI journeys seem to recognize that it’s less about abandoning the past than thoughtfully preparing the organization for the future.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Closing the gap between strategy and execution</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Full-stack CIOs must be able to map out the various layers of execution and planning that need to be done at every level of the organization to be successful. To help with this, Talasaz has developed a data and AI framework that draws on his own experiences “from the keyboard to the boardroom.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As Talasaz sees it, too many organizations have been doing good work in isolation. “They’re doing a lot of the right things,” he says. “They’re just not connected.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Boards may be discussing growth while business leaders redesign customer experiences. Product teams may be prioritizing new capabilities while architects modernize platforms. Data teams may be improving quality while engineers focus on delivery. Every group makes meaningful progress within its own domain, yet somewhere between strategy and execution, the connective tissue begins to disappear. Talasaz’s framework brings those connecting points to the forefront.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Crucially, the framework doesn’t begin with technology or AI or even with data. It begins with the experiences the organization hopes to create for its customers, employees, or partners. Many AI initiatives start with the question, “What can this technology do?” And indeed, we need to be inspired by the possibilities and challenged to think differently by what the technology can do. But, Talasaz emphasizes, we also need to ask what experiences we need to deliver for our business and how the technology can make that a reality.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The framework challenges CIOs to answer that question first. Only after the experiences are clearly defined does the conversation move to the capabilities required to deliver it, the business activities that support those capabilities, the AI and data products that enable them, and finally the data foundation that makes everything possible.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This shift in perspective ensures that, rather than allowing technology investments to search for business value, the business experience defines the technology required to deliver it. For CIOs, that’s more than a planning exercise. It’s a fundamentally different way of leading.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Over the coming months, the P4P community will be convening a series of small CxO roundtables to explore these issues and work more deeply with Afshean Talasaz’s 6×6 Data and AI Framework. CIOs and other enterprise leaders interested in participating are welcome to <a href="mailto:droberts@ouellette-online.com?subject=P4P:%206x6%20Framework%20Roundtable">reach out to me directly</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Determining the ROI of AI requires data that most companies lack]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Leadership wants to scale AI. Budgets are tripling. Adoption is up.



Then the CFO asks the question every board now asks: which of these initiatives is actually profitable?



Most organizations cannot answer that question, not because they lack visibility into cost, but because the cost data t...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688477/ai-nachrichten/determining-the-roi-of-ai-requires-data-that-most-companies-lack/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688477/ai-nachrichten/determining-the-roi-of-ai-requires-data-that-most-companies-lack/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 11:07:22 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Leadership wants to scale AI. Budgets are tripling. Adoption is up.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Then the CFO asks the question every board now asks: which of these initiatives is actually profitable?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most organizations cannot answer that question, not because they lack visibility into cost, but because the cost data they have was never designed to produce that answer.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Applying lessons learned from <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4147766/cloud-at-20-cost-complexity-and-control.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4147766/cloud-at-20-cost-complexity-and-control.html">managing cloud spend</a> won’t be a fix for the AI and ROI quandary. True, cloud taught a generation of CFOs that billing without business context is noise. So to get <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4061122/cloud-computing-has-an-roi-problem.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4061122/cloud-computing-has-an-roi-problem.html">cloud ROI</a>, they stitched two data sources together: cost data plus business data. AWS reveals which account, which region, which tag, which resource. Merge in customer and product mappings on top and the ROI of the cloud spend comes into focus.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But AI is harder. It requires three data sources: cost, business, and telemetry—the automatic collection of data from disparate sources that helps to clarify the whole picture of what happened and why. An executive or engineering lead can have AI invoices and customer revenue. But they have no way to connect them to business value. The token count on the OpenAI invoice does not specify which customer triggered which call, which feature it served, or whether the prompt produced a business outcome. That data does not exist in the provider’s billing.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">AI providers won’t fix this problem</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The situation is not likely to change anytime soon because AI providers are not in the business of attributing an enterprise’s costs to that enterprise’s customers. Instead, AI providers are in the business of selling tokens. The granularity they expose is the granularity their billing systems require, not the granularity a CFO requires.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Not convinced? Compare what AWS gives you to what an AI provider gives you.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AWS billing exposes resource IDs, account hierarchies, region, SKU, tag metadata, usage by the minute. Every dollar can be attributed to a workload, a team, a customer segment if it was tagged correctly. The data is rich enough that mature FinOps teams built unit economics on top of it years ago.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">An AI provider invoice gives you tokens consumed by model, with optional grouping by API key. That is the resolution. No request-level attribution. No customer ID. No feature mapping. No prompt outcome. No retry identification. Multi-step agent workflows collapse into a token count. Imagine a large bank receives a multi-million dollar AI invoice each month. But it has no visibility into what parts of the business were responsible for what parts of the cost so cannot allocate them.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If an enterprise wants to know what AI cost drove which customer or feature, it has to capture that data itself, inside an application, before the call leaves it. </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Three required sources</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Building AI ROI measurement requires three data sources, stitched together in a single model.</p>



<ol class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Cost data, normalized across providers.</strong> Every AI provider delivers cost differently. OpenAI invoices in one taxonomy, Anthropic in another, fine-tuning vendors and inference platforms each in their own. Cloud GPU costs sit in AWS or Azure billing. Vector database costs land in Pinecone or Snowflake invoices. None interoperate by default. Normalization is necessary but not sufficient. It will put all your AI costs in one schema. It does not tell you what they produced.</li>



<li><strong>Application-layer telemetry. </strong>This is the source most organizations are missing, and the one that makes AI ROI structurally different from cloud ROI. It requires instrumenting AI calls inside your application across six categories: request-level tracing tied to a customer or session ID; feature attribution tied to the product surface that triggered the call; agent-step capture for multi-step workflows; retry and fallback identification so recovery costs don’t get attributed to primary calls; model selection logging that records which model was chosen and why; and outcome capture that ties each call to whether it produced business value. None of this data exists in the provider’s billing. All of it has to be captured at the moment the call is made and stored in a system that can be stitched to the cost data.</li>



<li><strong>Business data. </strong>Revenue, customer segments, product hierarchies, and feature usage. The same business data already feeding your CRM and analytics stack, mapped to the customers and features the telemetry layer attributes calls to.</li>
</ol>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Stitched together, the three sources produce the unit economics every AI investment decision now requires: cost per customer interaction, margin per feature, profitability per agent workflow, ROI per model choice. None of these can be calculated from billing data alone. None can be calculated from telemetry alone. They require all three sources, modeled together in a way that maps cost to outcome.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why agentic AI makes this urgent</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Single-call inference is the easy case. One request, one cost, one customer, one outcome.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Agentic workflows are different. An agent decomposes a task into multiple steps. Each step calls a model. Some steps fall back to a different model when the first fails. Some steps retry on a poor result. Some steps invoke external tools that themselves cost money. A single user request can produce dozens of inference calls across multiple providers, with the cost compounding in ways the provider invoice cannot disaggregate.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If telemetry does not capture agent-step granularity, no one will know which steps are profitable. Aggregate costs will show up three weeks later in the invoice. By then, the workflow has been running at scale, customers are onboarded, and unprofitable paths have been retried thousands of times.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When agents make the calls, the volume of cost-generating events without business context attached grows by an order of magnitude. The window for instrumenting this before it becomes unmanageable is closing.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What changes when the three sources come together</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Once the three sources are stitched together, the AI investment conversation changes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Five different ways to build the same AI capability stop looking equivalent. They converge on adoption metrics and diverge by 10x on cost. The team picks the approach that delivers a similar business outcome at one-fifth the cost, because the team can finally see the difference. Product teams design features with margin awareness from the architecture phase, not from the post-launch budget review. Engineering teams choose model architectures with cost-per-outcome data alongside latency and quality. Leadership evaluates AI initiatives the way they evaluate any other capital allocation: on unit economics, not on the engagement chart. Aggregated invoices track the cost per customer interaction. Engagement metrics reveal margin per feature. Gut-instinct model selection is checked against real cost-per-outcome model selection results. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Within seconds, everyone can see which AI features are profitable, which should scale, and which should be killed. This is the insight everyone is looking for and companies that achieve it will optimize the benefits of AI.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The build trap</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI costs are compounding now. The board is not waiting 18 months for an internal project to reach production.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The temptation to build it anyway has never been sharper. AI coding tools have changed what a small engineering team can ship in a quarter. The instrumentation layer looks tractable. The cost normalization looks like a weekend project. The semantic model feels like something a senior engineer could draft over a sprint.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It is a trap. Three reasons.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Volume is the first. A production AI footprint generates millions of telemetry events per hour, and that volume scales with agentic adoption. Real-time ingestion, correlation, and attribution at that scale is not the same problem as <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4078884/what-is-vibe-coding-ai-writes-the-code-so-developers-can-think-big.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4078884/what-is-vibe-coding-ai-writes-the-code-so-developers-can-think-big.html">vibe coding</a> a prototype in an afternoon. It is a permanent operational system that has to be right every minute of every day.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The vendor landscape is the second. Cost data arrives in delayed billing windows from providers with non-interoperable schemas. Schemas change without notice. New AI providers enter the landscape monthly, each with its own taxonomy and metering. The system is not built once. It is maintained against a moving target that moves faster than most internal release cycles.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The third is what the first two add up to: this is business-critical infrastructure. The CFO and the board are going to make capital allocation decisions on the data this system produces. When schema drift goes unnoticed for two weeks, when an agent telemetry stream stops correlating to a vendor that quietly changed its billing API, the cost of being wrong is not a sprint of cleanup. It is a quarter of misallocated capital.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The build-vs.-buy question for engineering leaders has changed. It’s not “can we build this?” The honest answer is yes. The real question is whether the marginal hour of your strongest engineers is best spent stitching cost data to telemetry to business outcomes, or building the AI products that produce the revenue the cost data is measuring.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The capability is reproducible in weeks. The choice is whether to spend the next 18 months building it, or the next 18 months acting on it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>—</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/blogs/new-tech-forum"><strong><em>New Tech Forum</em></strong></a><em><strong> provides a venue for technology leaders—including vendors and other outside contributors—to explore and discuss emerging enterprise technology in unprecedented depth and breadth. The selection is subjective, based on our pick of the technologies we believe to be important and of greatest interest to InfoWorld readers. InfoWorld does not accept marketing collateral for publication and reserves the right to edit all contributed content. Send all </strong></em><em><strong>inquiries to </strong></em><a href="mailto:doug_dineley@foundryco.com"><strong><em>doug_dineley@foundryco.com</em></strong></a><em><strong>.</strong></em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Krieg der Sterne: Wie Hotels und Restaurants ihre Google-Bewertungen frisieren]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag Krieg der Sterne: Wie Hotels und Restaurants ihre Google-Bewertungen frisieren erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Wer ein Restaurant oder Hotel auf Google Maps sucht, orientiert sic...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688458/it-nachrichten/krieg-der-sterne-wie-hotels-und-restaurants-ihre-google-bewertungen-frisieren/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688458/it-nachrichten/krieg-der-sterne-wie-hotels-und-restaurants-ihre-google-bewertungen-frisieren/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 11:05:54 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/23/google-bewertungen-geloescht/">Krieg der Sterne: Wie Hotels und Restaurants ihre Google-Bewertungen frisieren</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Wer ein Restaurant oder Hotel auf Google Maps sucht, orientiert sich an den Sternebewertungen. Doch eine dpa-Stichprobe zeigt, dass allein in Hessen 17 Prozent der Gastbetriebe bereits Rezensionen haben löschen lassen – in Frankfurt sogar fast jeder Dritte. Der Grund: Was als Schutz vor Diffamierung gedacht war, ist längst zu einem Reputationswerkzeug verkommen. Seit April […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/23/google-bewertungen-geloescht/">Krieg der Sterne: Wie Hotels und Restaurants ihre Google-Bewertungen frisieren</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Drei Anbieter, zwei Systeme, kein Überblick: Das ist der bAV-Alltag im Mittelstand]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag Drei Anbieter, zwei Systeme, kein Überblick: Das ist der bAV-Alltag im Mittelstand erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Drei Anbieter, zwei Systeme, ein Ordner voller Altverträge und ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688295/it-security-nachrichten/drei-anbieter-zwei-systeme-kein-ueberblick-das-ist-der-bav-alltag-im-mittelstand/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688295/it-security-nachrichten/drei-anbieter-zwei-systeme-kein-ueberblick-das-ist-der-bav-alltag-im-mittelstand/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 09:42:34 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/23/drei-anbieter-zwei-systeme-kein-ueberblick-das-ist-der-bav-alltag-im-mittelstand/">Drei Anbieter, zwei Systeme, kein Überblick: Das ist der bAV-Alltag im Mittelstand</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Drei Anbieter, zwei Systeme, ein Ordner voller Altverträge und niemand im Unternehmen, der noch weiß, was eigentlich wo gilt. Betriebliche Altersvorsorge im Mittelstand sieht in der Praxis selten so aus wie in der Theorie. Sie ist gewachsen, nicht geplant. Und genau das wird zum Problem, für HR, für den CFO und für jeden Mitarbeitenden, der […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/23/drei-anbieter-zwei-systeme-kein-ueberblick-das-ist-der-bav-alltag-im-mittelstand/">Drei Anbieter, zwei Systeme, kein Überblick: Das ist der bAV-Alltag im Mittelstand</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Großbritannien führt Steuer für E-Autos ein – jetzt zählt jeder Kilometer]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag Großbritannien führt Steuer für E-Autos ein – jetzt zählt jeder Kilometer erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Großbritannien verändert die Besteuerung von Elektroautos. Ab April 2028...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687928/it-nachrichten/grossbritannien-fuehrt-steuer-fuer-e-autos-ein-jetzt-zaehlt-jeder-kilometer/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687928/it-nachrichten/grossbritannien-fuehrt-steuer-fuer-e-autos-ein-jetzt-zaehlt-jeder-kilometer/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 06:03:21 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/23/elektroauto-steuer-grossbritannien/">Großbritannien führt Steuer für E-Autos ein – jetzt zählt jeder Kilometer</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Großbritannien verändert die Besteuerung von Elektroautos. Ab April 2028 sollen Halter von Stromern erstmals eine fahrleistungsabhängige Elektroauto-Steuer pro Meile zahlen. Die Maßnahme soll den absehbaren Ausfall klassischer Kraftstoffsteuern kompensieren, ohne den Wandel zur Elektromobilität zu bremsen. Ein umfassendes Förderpaket soll gleichzeitig den Umstieg erleichtern. Das britische Finanzministerium (HM Treasury) veröffentlichte kürzlich die Ergebnisse einer umfassenden […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/23/elektroauto-steuer-grossbritannien/">Großbritannien führt Steuer für E-Autos ein – jetzt zählt jeder Kilometer</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[HPR4689: Cheap Yellow Display Project Part 8: Writing the code]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[This show has been flagged as Clean by the host.



Hello, again. This is Trey.










Welcome to part 8 in my Cheap Yellow Display (CYD) Project series.  










If you wish to catch up on earlier episodes, you can find them on my 

HPR profile page



https://www.hackerp...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687798/podcasts/hpr4689-cheap-yellow-display-project-part-8-writing-the-code/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687798/podcasts/hpr4689-cheap-yellow-display-project-part-8-writing-the-code/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 02:06:01 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Podcasts</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This show has been flagged as Clean by the host.</p>

<p>

Hello, again. This is Trey.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Welcome to part 8 in my Cheap Yellow Display (CYD) Project series.  

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

If you wish to catch up on earlier episodes, you can find them on my 
<a href="https://www.hackerpublicradio.org/correspondents/0394.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
HPR profile page</a>


<a href="https://www.hackerpublicradio.org/correspondents/0394.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
https://www.hackerpublicradio.org/correspondents/0394.html</a>



</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

It is hard to believe that I started this project and the HPR series to document it more than a year ago.  Time flies.  Life happens. I spent the last 8 months so focused on work related activities that I had to set the project aside.  And once I set it aside, it was difficult to get back to again.  The one time I tried, I found that my son's old Windows laptop, which I had commandeered to use for the project, was once and truly dead.  

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

We live in a different world now than we did when I began this project.  Today, everything is about AI – how it is changing our world, increasing efficiencies, and even displacing certain types of jobs.  "Vibe coding" is transforming the way we make software, and now everyone is a developer.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Within my organization, we are all being strongly encouraged to learn more about AI and apply it in our daily work.  We are blessed to have access to a wide range of training and to powerful tools which support the process.  Several colleagues within my organization and outside my organization have recommended Claude Code -- for development, for organization, for brainstorming, and for much more.  My role is not that of a developer, and I have had no need for Claude Code at work.  There are plenty of other tools for me to use.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

But at home, I thought... I could install Claude Code at home to experiment with and to learn.  And then it hit me.  I wonder if I could use Claude Code to help me with my stalled CYD project.  

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

"Hello, my name is Trey, and I am a fraud."

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

OK.  I don't think I am a fraud, but having never used such a powerful tool to help me code, I feel a little bit like a fraud, with Claude doing the work for me. Let's talk through what we did.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

As I mentioned, I was unable to use the laptop on which I created the original GUI code.  But no worries, because It was all on GitHub, right?

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

So, I began by trying to install Claude Code on one of my Ubuntu machines.  That failed miserably, and all the instructions I found online recommended running it on Windows.  So I transitioned to installing Claude Code on a freshly built Windows 10 system using some old hardware which will not support Windows 11.  Surprisingly, It seems that Claude wants to run within Ubuntu on Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL).

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Once I went through all the hoops for installing and setting up my basic subscription, I got to work.  I created a new directory to use for all my project files, and another one for Claude to write all its output files to.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Everything I have read and heard about using Claude Code for a project like this recommended beginning by using Claude to create the project plan.  So my first prompt was as follows:

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

"I am building a project using an ESP32 cheap yellow display. The final goal is to have a device with a graphical user interface which will allow me store several text messages, each assigned to their own specific button. Then, when one of the buttons is pressed, the message will be converted into morse code, and the message will be sent by blinking an onboard LED. I already have the initial design for the GUI coded in my github repository. Please construct a detailed step by step plan for building this application"

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

I wanted to keep it simple at the beginning, so even though I plan to use an opto-isolated relay for the output, I am starting out using the built in LED.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Claude asked me for the URL for my Github repository, and I provided it.  After thinking for a bit, it produced a project plan.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

CYD Morse Sender — Step-by-Step Build Plan

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

What You Already Have

</p>

<p>

- 3 fully designed LVGL screens (Send, Config, Keyboard)

</p>

<p>

- 7 send buttons with green styling on the Send Screen

</p>

<p>

- Speed slider (5–30 WPM) and program slot dropdown on Config Screen

</p>

<p>

- Text area + LVGL keyboard widget on Keyboard Screen

</p>

<p>

- Display driver and touchscreen hardware initialized (but touch read was stubbed out)

</p>

<p>

---

</p>

<p>

Phase 1: Fix Touchscreen Input

</p>

<p>

Initialize the XPT2046 on VSPI, replace the hardcoded touched = false with real touch data, calibrate raw ADC coordinates to screen pixels, and verify all three nav buttons transition screens correctly.                         

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Phase 2: Persistent Message Storage

</p>

<p>

Use Preferences.h / NVS to store 7 messages ("msg0" – "msg6") that survive power cycles. Load on boot and populate send button labels.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Phase 3: Config Screen — Slot Selection &amp; Speed

</p>

<p>

Wire the Program dropdown to g_selectedSlot, wire the Speed slider to g_wpm with a live WPM label, and wire the Set button to clear the text area and navigate to the Keyboard Screen.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Phase 4: Keyboard Screen — Capture and Save Text

</p>

<p>

On keyboard OK (LV_EVENT_READY): read the text area, save to NVS, update the send button label, navigate back. On Cancel: navigate back without saving.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Phase 5: Morse Code Engine

</p>

<p>

Build morse.h with the full A–Z / 0–9 lookup table, a textToMorse() converter, and Paris-standard timing (unit_ms = 1200 / wpm).

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Phase 6: Non-Blocking LED Transmission

</p>

<p>

State machine (IDLE / LED_ON / LED_OFF) driven by millis() in a morseUpdate() function called every loop — no delay().   LED on GPIO 17 (blue).

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Phase 7: Wire the Send Buttons

</p>

<p>

Each button calls startMorse(getMessage(slot)) if not already transmitting. Disable all send buttons during TX; re-enable when the state machine reaches the end.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Phase 8: Integration &amp; Polish

</p>

<p>

Stop button, WPM persistence, empty-slot guard, serial debug output, final touch calibration, end-to-end test checklist.

</p>

<p>

---

</p>

<p>

Recommended order: Phase 1 → 2 → 7 (partial) → 5 → 6 → 7 (full) → 3 → 4 → 8

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

This was wild!  Claude determined exactly how far along I was in the project, and also alerted me to the fact that the "touch read was stubbed out".  Ugh.  This means that the files I had uploaded to GitHub were my original GUI files (Episode 05 – HPR4532 - 
<a href="https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4532/index.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4532/index.html</a>

) and not the ones that I finally got working properly (Episode 07 – HPR4624 - 
<a href="https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4624/index.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4624/index.html</a>

).  That was my own fault.  Did I mention that I don't get Git?  I REALLY need to learn to properly use Git!

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

But, we have a plan, broken down by eight numbered phases.  And they seem to address all the functionality I wanted with a few additional things I had not thought about.  Interestingly, even though these phases are sequentially numbered, Claud recommended that we approach them in a bizarre order: Phase 1 → 2 → 7 (partial) → 5 → 6 → 7 (full) → 3 → 4 → 8 .

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Alright.  Let's see what we can do.  The first phase is to fix the touchscreen input.  

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Claude took me through it step-by-step, asking as it needed to read specific project files.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Finally, it wrote a new ui.ino code file to my speficied output directory for me to test.  I copied it into the correct file location, said a quick prayer, compiled in Arduino IDE, and downloaded to the CYD.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Well, that is... interesting.  The display looked nothing like it was supposed to.  There were vertical green bars with smaller dashed green vertical stripes in them. I will include a picture in the show notes so that you can see what it looked like and why it was so difficult to describe.  

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

<a href="https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4689/hpr4689_image_1.jpeg">
<img src="https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4689/hpr4689_image_1_tn.jpeg">
</a>

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

I spent the next hour or so trying to explain what I was seeing to a chat bot.  Claude recommended potential fixes which either did nothing or made the situation worse.  I began questioning whether this was a good idea, how people actually gained efficiencies talking to a bot, and even several life choices.  

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Then I had a thought.  I prompted Claude:

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

If I were to take a picture of the screen on the cheap yellow display and copy it into the output folder, would you be able to analyze it to better determine what is wrong and how to fix it?

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Shockingly, Claude answered in the affirmative, and told me to copy the picture to the output folder and let it know when to proceed.  It analyzed the picture and more of the supporting files it had copied from my GitHub, asking each time if it could access that file.  It determined that my original code was written for a flavor of LVGL version 8 and I was now using LVGL 9.5.  

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

It recommended changes, and then asked permission to make those changes, file by file.  .h files &amp; .c files,  Finally, I just gave it permission to edit the files in the project folder without asking for permission for each file each time.  Claude was still explaining each change, showing me exactly what would be changed, and asking for permission, so that I could review all of the changes.  But now it was not asking additional permission to write to each of the impacted files.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Next, Code compiled and downloaded.  Different screen, but not right. Again, I took a picture and gave it to Claude to analyze.  So, Claude paused and altered the code to generate a specific test pattern overtop of the GUI.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

<a href="https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4689/hpr4689_image_2.jpeg">
<img src="https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4689/hpr4689_image_2_tn.jpeg">
</a>

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

The test pattern was supposed to cover the entire rectangular screen.  But parts of the pattern were in a square on the screen and parts were not.  Another photograph and analysis, told Claude that there were some rotation/screensize issues.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

We repeated this several times.  Some resulted in improvement, and others did not.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

This is the point where I noticed something interesting. Not about Claude, specifically, or about the app.  But I noticed something interesting about myself and about the process.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Previously, when I was working through some of these challenges without Claud, I found myself becoming more and more stressed, frustrated, and angry, until I found a solution.  Then another problem would repeat the cycle.  Success in the end was great, but the emotional extremes during the process were not always pleasant.  

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Now, I was effectively managing the project, and relaying information to the resource responsible for fixing the problems -- a very different experience.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

But I also ran into another issue.  Claude became absolutely certain that the problem revolved around the device not accurately knowing where the 4 corners of the screen were.  But in reality, the output of the test pattern was rotated 90 degrees from the actual screen.  It took several iterations of me insisting that the problem had to do with screen orientation and not corner coordinates.  It was interesting to experience the tool doubling down on an obvious mistake, but we finally resolved that.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Again, while it was frustrating, it was much less stressful.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

We proceeded to 
<strong>

<em>
Phase 2: Persistent Message Storage</em>

</strong>

where we ensured that the button labels on the send screen were stored in the devices persistent storage, so that, when they are edited to contain the message they should send, that information would survive a reboot.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Next, we combined elements of 
<strong>

<em>
Phase 5: Morse Code Engine</em>

</strong>

, 
<strong>

<em>
Phase 6: Non-Blocking LED Transmission</em>

</strong>

, and 
<strong>

<em>
Phase 7: Wire the Send Buttons</em>

</strong>

together. Building the morse code engine was an area I had been thinking about for a while.  I already had working parts of something similar in the Arduino practice oscillator I have referenced a few times in this series.  The code for the practice oscillator may be found on my GitHub, but it was all based on original code from jmharvey1, with my only contribution being making pin assignments variables so that the code could easily be ported to different devices.  

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

So, I was happy that we were building the morse code engine directly.  The code for it may be found in morse.h, which uses a constant character lookup table to define each character.  Without any specific direction from me, Claude used the PARIS timing methods I have already described within Episode 6 of this series.  It defines timing for DOT, DASH, LETTER_GAP, and WORD_GAP, and all are based on a simple calculation of 1200 ms / the number of words per minute (WPM) we wish to transmit.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Along the way, we discovered that, if we tried to use the delay() function, it would crash the program due to a conflict with the LVGL timer used for touchscreen inputs. Claude altered all the delays accordingly.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Then, 
<strong>

<em>
Phase 3: Config Screen — Slot Selection &amp; Speed</em>

</strong>

allowed us to configure the WPM we wished to use in addition to selecting a specific Send button to reconfigure.  This forced us to work on 
<strong>

<em>
Phase 4: Keyboard Screen — Capture and Save Text</em>

</strong>

which is used to type the entries for each Send button.  At this point, I also decided that we would want to also use the Keyboard Screen to send ad hoc morse as we typed it.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

During this phase we discovered several bugs which seemed to cause random freezes.  Careful troubleshooting with messages output to the Arduino IDE's serial console helped us narrow down the causes and remedy them.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Finally all the tests worked and I am able to merrily pre-configure macro buttons with custom messages and use the CYD to send the morse code for those messages to the on-board LED at whichever rate I specify.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

I have noticed in my presentation of this narrative that I repeatedly slip into the first person plural terms "we" and "us" instead of the first person singular terms "I" and "me".  I have unconsciously personified Claud and recognized it as an integral part of my (formerly one person) development team.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

I finally configured Claude to connect to my GitHub repo and upload all the files and documentation. We additionally created a CYD-Narrative.md file which describes in more detail all the work which was done on the project.  I still do not 100% get git, but we are successfully using it.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

You can find all these files in my GitHub repo (
<a href="https://github.com/jttrey3/CYD_MorseSender" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
https://github.com/jttrey3/CYD_MorseSender</a>

) where they are shared under a GPL 3.0 license.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

There are still several additional steps I plan to complete in the next few months.  

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

1. I will be integrating an opto-isolated relay which will allow me to plug the device into the straight key input on any amateur radio.  This will require a battery power source, charge controller, and more hardware.

</p>

<ol>

<li>

I... make that "We" (Claude &amp; I)  will be modifying the code to support an audio side tone through an attached speaker when sending code

</li>

<li>

We will add an output selection switch to the config page to choose any combination of speaker, relay, or LED as output.

</li>

<li>

We will develop a downloadable firmware which I hope to share with the Cheap Yellow Display community.

</li>

</ol>

<p>


</p>

<p>

If you can think of any additional features you would like to see integrated, please drop me an email using the address in my HPR profile.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

I may also work with a friend to attempt to 3d print a case for the entire contraption, and I will be sure to record additional episodes sharing the process.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

I have learned so much throughout this project, about the CYD, ESP32, GUIs, Claude Code, GitHub, and most of all, about myself.  

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Does using AI to develop this code make me a fraud? It still feels like it in some ways.  

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Does it make me more productive?  ABSOLUTELY!  I made consistent forward progress when I only had 30-60 minutes each day to work on it, and everything discussed in this episode was completed in less than a week.  If I had been able to work on it for a few hours uninterrupted, it may have only taken me 3-5 hours.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Does it empower and inspire me to do more projects like this?  100%  I feel like I had support working with me the whole way.  I was less stressed overall, and it had less of an impact on the amount of and quality of time I spent with my family.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

I will be wrapping up this series soon, without any more 6 month gaps, I hope.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Until next time...

</p>

<p>

</p>


<p><a href="https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4689/index.html#comments">Provide <strong>feedback</strong> on this episode</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[v2.1.218]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[What's changed

Changed /code-review to run as a background subagent, so review work no longer fills your conversation and keeps stacked slash commands as its review target
Added screen-reader announcements of deleted text for word and line deletions (Option+Delete, Ctrl+W, Cmd+Backspace, Ctrl+U,...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687638/downloads/v21218/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687638/downloads/v21218/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 23:32:59 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾 Downloads</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>What's changed</h2>
<ul>
<li>Changed <code>/code-review</code> to run as a background subagent, so review work no longer fills your conversation and keeps stacked slash commands as its review target</li>
<li>Added screen-reader announcements of deleted text for word and line deletions (<code>Option+Delete</code>, <code>Ctrl+W</code>, <code>Cmd+Backspace</code>, <code>Ctrl+U</code>, <code>Ctrl+K</code>) in <code>--ax-screen-reader</code> mode</li>
<li>Fixed Windows paths with <code>\u</code>-prefixed segments (like <code>C:\Users\unicorn</code>) being corrupted into CJK characters in tool inputs, which made those files inaccessible</li>
<li>Fixed the left arrow key discarding the conversation with no undo: presses right after editing now ask to confirm, and Esc in the agent view returns to the conversation it backgrounded</li>
<li>Added HTTP status and error text to <code>claude mcp list</code> and <code>/mcp</code> when a server fails to connect, and a warning for MCP config values with hidden leading or trailing whitespace</li>
<li>Fixed multi-line paste collapsing into one line with <code>j</code> in place of newlines in terminals that encode pasted newlines as Ctrl+J</li>
<li>Fixed <code>/context</code> reporting stale pre-compact token usage after compacting from the message picker</li>
<li>Fixed <code>/ultrareview</code> failing on descriptive arguments like "review my auth changes" — they now run a review of your current branch with the text applied as a note to the findings</li>
<li>Fixed <code>/code-review ultra</code> silently running a local review in non-interactive sessions — it now launches the cloud review</li>
<li>Fixed gateway spend metering to price Bedrock application-inference-profile ARNs and other config-mapped upstream model IDs at the configured model's rates</li>
<li>Fixed mojibake when a long IDE selection was truncated mid-emoji, and a case where a tool executor error could be silently dropped</li>
<li>Fixed an engine teardown race that could start and abandon a phantom turn, and made input pushed after close consistently rejected</li>
<li>Fixed spurious "[Request interrupted by user]" messages after interrupted tool calls, and an unpaired <code>tool_use</code> block left in the transcript when a tool aborted mid-response</li>
<li>Fixed VoiceOver reading "new line" instead of echoing the typed space at the end of the input in <code>--ax-screen-reader</code> mode</li>
<li>Fixed plugin and settings panels not moving the terminal cursor to the focused row, so screen readers and magnifiers can follow arrow-key navigation</li>
<li>Fixed crashes (maximum call stack exceeded) when a deeply nested watched directory tree was deleted or moved, and when rendering deeply nested UI trees</li>
<li>Fixed pull request events occasionally being lost when a session exited immediately after creating or linking a PR</li>
<li>Fixed the Bedrock setup wizard failing profile verification for assume-role profiles in partitioned AWS regions and on proxy-only networks</li>
<li>Fixed rare negative or incorrect turn duration measurements after a system clock adjustment by timing turns with a monotonic clock</li>
<li>Fixed the "N MCP servers need authentication" startup notice over-counting claude.ai connectors that aren't connected in claude.ai</li>
<li>Fixed prompt history entries being dropped or duplicated when history writes raced or failed</li>
<li>Fixed a retry loop that re-sent identical doomed requests after a context-overflow error with a large thinking budget; <code>Ctrl+B</code> backgrounding now applies the same background-shell caps as other paths</li>
<li>Fixed agent frontmatter hooks running from untrusted folders: hooks now require the agent file's own folder to have accepted workspace trust</li>
<li>Fixed fork-session lineage being lost after compaction in headless and SDK sessions</li>
<li>Fixed a resumed session failing every turn, or crashing on resume, when its history held a malformed delta attachment</li>
<li>Improved <code>/ultrareview</code> error feedback so Claude can correct an invalid argument instead of retrying it unchanged</li>
<li>Improved auto mode: the dangerous-rm, background-<code>&amp;</code>, and suspicious-Windows-path checks no longer open permission dialogs; the auto-mode classifier adjudicates them instead</li>
<li>Improved sandbox command restrictions for IDE interactions</li>
<li>Improved trust dialogs to name the repository root the grant covers</li>
<li>Changed <code>/deep-research</code> to start only when invoked manually; Claude no longer launches it on its own</li>
<li>Changed plan mode with auto to no longer prompt for Bash commands the static analyzer can't prove read-only; the auto-mode classifier judges them instead</li>
<li>Added an announcement when fast mode changes as a result of switching models via <code>/config model=&lt;x&gt;</code> or Remote Control</li>
<li>Changed server-managed settings so benign feature and cost toggles no longer trigger the settings-approval prompt</li>
<li>Changed agent markdown files to reject agent names containing <code>:</code>, which is reserved for plugin namespacing</li>
<li>Changed skills with <code>context: fork</code> to run in the background by default; opt out per skill with <code>background: false</code></li>
<li>Added <code>yes</code>/<code>no</code>/<code>on</code>/<code>off</code>/<code>1</code>/<code>0</code> (case-insensitive) as accepted values for skill and plugin frontmatter booleans, alongside <code>true</code>/<code>false</code></li>
<li>Fixed remote sessions continuing to send heartbeats after their worker was replaced, which left long-lived desktop and IDE processes retrying a rejected request every few seconds forever</li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Paskoocheh: When you need a tool to reach the tool]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[++ This guest post is part of a spotlight series on the organizations defending the free Internet.++
Due to heavy information controls, people in Iran face significant barriers to accessing the Internet. Authorities have actively blocked numerous websites and apps, including conventional circumve...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687545/it-security-tools/paskoocheh-when-you-need-a-tool-to-reach-the-tool/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687545/it-security-tools/paskoocheh-when-you-need-a-tool-to-reach-the-tool/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 22:34:54 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾 IT Security Tools</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<article class="blog-post">
    <picture>
      <source media="(min-width:415px)" srcset="https://blog.torproject.org/when-you-need-a-tool-to-reach-the-tool-Paskoocheh/lead.webp" type="image/webp">
<source srcset="https://blog.torproject.org/when-you-need-a-tool-to-reach-the-tool-Paskoocheh/lead_small.webp" type="image/webp">

      <img class="lead" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" loading="lazy" src="https://blog.torproject.org/when-you-need-a-tool-to-reach-the-tool-Paskoocheh/lead.png">
    </picture>
    <div class="body"><p><em><strong>++ This guest post is part of a spotlight series on the organizations <a href="https://internetfreedom.torproject.org/">defending the free Internet</a>.++</strong></em></p>
<p>Due to heavy information controls, people in Iran face significant barriers to accessing the Internet. Authorities have actively blocked numerous websites and apps, including conventional circumvention and digital security tools such as VPNs, social media platforms, and the app stores themselves. This creates a "chicken-and-egg" problem: users need a VPN to download a VPN.</p>
<p>Launched in 2016, <a href="https://paskoocheh.com/">Paskoocheh</a>, Persian for "alleyway," is an open source alternative app store, community hub, and one-stop-shop for users to access information and tools to circumvent censorship, enhance their privacy, securely communicate, and express themselves freely online. Developed and maintained by ASL19, a technology and exiled media organization named after Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Paskoocheh restores access and allows people to reach trusted tools through four censorship-resilient channels: the Paskoocheh website, Android App, Email bot, and Telegram bot. </p>
<p>Users are also able to reach our Persian-speaking support team through the Paskoocheh Helpdesk, which handles over 200 tickets daily. In addition, ASL19 translates and publishes accessible user guides, <a href="https://paskoocheh.com/blog/posts/">blog posts</a>, and multimedia content to help users navigate online privacy and digital security best practices.</p>
<p>Paskoocheh serves as more than an alternative app store; it is also a bridge between tool developers and in-country users. Our support team relays user feedback to tool developers, helping improve tools and overall experience in Iran. We also conduct in-country testing with developers and user communities to evaluate new features and strengthen censorship-resilient technologies.</p>
<h2>Paskoocheh's impact so far</h2>
<p>This combination of access, user support, and education has turned Paskoocheh into a critical lifeline for users in Iran.</p>
<ul>
<li><p><strong># of tool downloads since 2016:</strong>   17,634,852 </p>
</li>
<li><p><strong># of community members in Iran supporting testing and localization efforts:</strong>  2,000+</p>
</li>
<li><p><strong># of monthly active users on web and app:</strong>  ~200K</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p>During periods of internet disruption and nationwide protests in Iran, these tools became critical communication lifelines. One longtime user wrote to us: </p>
<blockquote><p><em>"I've been using this free app for several years now. It's free, unique, and unlike others, it has no equal." Reflecting on the broader digital environment in the country, they added that "in these difficult economic conditions, people are struggling just to survive, while many apps either empty people's pockets, deceive and lie to them, or serve as tools for spying and propaganda."</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Messages like these highlight the importance of privacy-preserving technologies in environments where surveillance, censorship, and disinformation shape everyday life online. In moments of crisis, internet freedom tools become part of how people maintain relationships, exchange trusted information, and stay connected to the outside world. For some users, these tools also made it possible to continue reporting on events on the ground, verify information during periods of state-backed disinformation, and safely communicate evidence of abuses despite widespread surveillance and connectivity disruptions.</p>
<h2>The future of Paskoocheh: Scaling a community-first approach to internet freedom</h2>
<p>As internet censorship tactics evolve rapidly, internet shutdowns are becoming more frequent and more sophisticated, cutting communities off from information, communication, and one another. </p>
<p>What we have learned through this work is that access alone is not enough. Technology is only useful if people trust it, understand how to use it safely, and can rely on support networks when digital spaces become unstable or dangerous.</p>
<p>That is why our work extends beyond technical development. Alongside building secure access technologies, ASL19 invests heavily in user education, digital security guidance, and community capacity building. Every support ticket answered, training delivered, and piece of digital safety guidance shared helps people stay connected under pressure. </p>
<p>This human-centered approach is becoming increasingly important as authoritarian tactics evolve globally. During internet shutdowns and heightened censorship, local helper communities often become the first line of assistance for journalists, activists, students, and ordinary citizens. </p>
<p>With additional support, ASL19 aims to continue expanding Paskoocheh beyond its current capacity into a broader resilience ecosystem that combines technical innovation with stronger on-the-ground support systems. This includes improving access to trusted circumvention and privacy tools during shutdowns, expanding multilingual user support and educational resources, and deepening collaboration with communities operating under digital authoritarianism. </p>
<p>This work is not solely about technology products. At a moment when most people's understanding of the internet is shaped by the little squares in their pockets, it is important to acknowledge and support the broader ecosystems that make access possible. Civil society, independent media, and grassroots communities all play a part in helping people survive under pressure. This is why partnerships within the internet freedom ecosystem matter. Living under digital authoritarianism means that these are not abstract protections against hypothetical risks, but practical tools that make journalism, organizing, education, and communication possible in the first place. </p>
<h3>About ASL19</h3>
<p>Named after Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, ASL19 is a technology and exiled media organization working to counter digital authoritarianism. For more than a decade, we have partnered with civil society groups, journalists, researchers, activists, and internet users living under some of the world's most restrictive online environments. Guided by the belief that privacy and internet freedom are essential to safe communication, access to information, and civic participation, ASL19 develops technologies and support systems that help people navigate censorship, surveillance, internet shutdowns, and information manipulation. In countries such as Iran, Russia, and China, these tools serve as critical lifelines, enabling people to communicate securely, access information, document human rights abuses, and stay connected to the outside world.</p>

    </div>
  <div class="categories">
    <ul><li>
        <a href="https://blog.torproject.org/category/community">
          community
        </a>
      </li><li>
        <a href="https://blog.torproject.org/category/human-rights">
          human rights
        </a>
      </li><li>
        <a href="https://blog.torproject.org/category/partners">
          partners
        </a>
      </li><li>
        <a href="https://blog.torproject.org/category/fundraising">
          fundraising
        </a>
      </li></ul>
  </div>
  </article>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[EU gives Paramount's Warner Bros. acquisition the go-ahead]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[As long as Paramount ends its distribution business with Universal, it can purchase Warner Bros. Discovery in Europe.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687466/it-nachrichten/eu-gives-paramounts-warner-bros-acquisition-the-go-ahead/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687466/it-nachrichten/eu-gives-paramounts-warner-bros-acquisition-the-go-ahead/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 21:49:24 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[As long as Paramount ends its distribution business with Universal, it can purchase Warner Bros. Discovery in Europe.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Ted Lasso Season 4 Early Buzz Says New Episodes Bring Back Season 1 Magic]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Ted Lasso season 4 is almost here, and early reports suggest fans have good reason to feel excited about the show's return. The new season premieres on August 5 with its first episode, followed by weekly releases through October 7, and people close to the production believe it delivers a stronger...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687335/ios-mac-os/ted-lasso-season-4-early-buzz-says-new-episodes-bring-back-season-1-magic/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687335/ios-mac-os/ted-lasso-season-4-early-buzz-says-new-episodes-bring-back-season-1-magic/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 20:40:27 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ted Lasso season 4 is almost here, and early reports suggest fans have good reason to feel excited about the show's return. The new season premieres on August 5 with its first episode, followed by weekly releases through October 7, and people close to the production believe it delivers a stronger story than season 3 while bringing back the charm that made the series a global hit.



The Hollywood Reporter recently shared an in-depth look at how season 4 came together, revealing that Jason Sudeikis originally planned to end the series after three seasons before changing his mind. Instead of moving ahead with one of several spinoff ideas, including projects centered on Roy Kent and Keeley Jones, the creative team decided to continue the main story with a fresh direction.



Season 4 shifts its focus to AFC Richmond's women's team, which was teased during the season 3 finale. Jason Sudeikis returns as Ted Lasso, while Hannah Waddingham, Juno Temple, Brett Goldstein, and several familiar faces also reprise their roles. The team also welcomed sitcom veteran Jack Burditt, who joined as co-showrunner to help keep production on schedule while Sudeikis continued leading the creative side.



Although critics have not published reviews yet, people involved with the series have shared positive reactions behind the scenes. Brett Goldstein said the new season has some of the season 1 magic, and several others reportedly share the same opinion. Internal feedback also describes season 4 as considerably stronger than season 3, which received mixed reactions because of its longer episodes and production challenges.



Jason Sudeikis said he finally returned because he still had more stories to tell, and he believes Ted Lasso remains meaningful for both him and the audience. If season 4 performs well, the writers expect to begin planning a fifth season, with Sudeikis already thinking about another three-season story arc.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Diese Länder haben die besten Gesundheitssysteme]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag Diese Länder haben die besten Gesundheitssysteme erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Nicht großartig darüber nachdenken zu müssen, wie das Gesundheitssystem funktioniert, ist ein Lux...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687304/it-security-nachrichten/diese-laender-haben-die-besten-gesundheitssysteme/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687304/it-security-nachrichten/diese-laender-haben-die-besten-gesundheitssysteme/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 20:33:53 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/22/laender-beste-gesundheitssystem/">Diese Länder haben die besten Gesundheitssysteme</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Nicht großartig darüber nachdenken zu müssen, wie das Gesundheitssystem funktioniert, ist ein Luxus, den viele Menschen in Deutschland genießen. Dabei entscheidet die medizinische Infrastruktur im Ernstfall über Leben und Tod. Wir verraten in unserem Ranking, welche zehn Länder im Vergleich am besten abschneiden, und wo Deutschland landet. Die medizinische Versorgung sagt sehr viel über den […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/22/laender-beste-gesundheitssystem/">Diese Länder haben die besten Gesundheitssysteme</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CVE-2026-45366 | universal-tool-calling-protocol typescript-utcp up to 1.1.1 registerManual server-side request forgery (GHSA-r8j5-8747-88cm)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A vulnerability has been found in universal-tool-calling-protocol typescript-utcp up to 1.1.1 and classified as critical. This vulnerability affects the function registerManual. The manipulation leads to server-side request forgery.

This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2026-45366. It is possible ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687106/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-45366-universal-tool-calling-protocol-typescript-utcp-up-to-111-registermanual-server-side-request-forgery-ghsa-r8j5-8747-88cm/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687106/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-45366-universal-tool-calling-protocol-typescript-utcp-up-to-111-registermanual-server-side-request-forgery-ghsa-r8j5-8747-88cm/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 19:13:29 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A vulnerability has been found in <a href="https://vuldb.com/product/universal-tool-calling-protocol:typescript-utcp">universal-tool-calling-protocol typescript-utcp up to 1.1.1</a> and classified as <a href="https://vuldb.com/kb/risk">critical</a>. This vulnerability affects the function <code>registerManual</code>. The manipulation leads to server-side request forgery.

This vulnerability is traded as <a href="https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-45366">CVE-2026-45366</a>. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available.

The affected component should be upgraded.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The compound effect your AI adoption strategy is missing]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[For many engineering teams, AI adoption means individual engineers write code faster while overall team velocity remains stagnant. Individual speed and team speed are produced by different things, and AI has mostly accelerated the first but not the second.



The step from individual AI adoption ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3686645/it-nachrichten/the-compound-effect-your-ai-adoption-strategy-is-missing/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3686645/it-nachrichten/the-compound-effect-your-ai-adoption-strategy-is-missing/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 16:23:34 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For many engineering teams, AI adoption means individual engineers write code faster while overall team velocity remains stagnant. Individual speed and team speed are produced by different things, and AI has mostly accelerated the first but not the second.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The step from individual AI adoption to team advantage is one many organizations haven’t taken yet, but it’s the step where real ROI lives. Make the leap and every individual gain starts compounding into something the whole team feels.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Faster individuals, but the same team pace</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A developer with a good AI assistant can produce more and produce faster, but ten developers all doing that, each in their own way, with their own tools and their own context, don’t add up to a team that is ten times better. More often they add up to a team moving faster in ten different directions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The speed stays with the person who created it. The reasoning, context, and decisions that the rest of the team would need to build on that speed gets lost.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These three structural problems explain why:</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Problem #1: Context evaporates at scale</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">An engineer spends an hour with an AI agent working through a hard design decision. They land somewhere good. The code ships. But the reasoning, the alternatives they ruled out, and the constraints they discovered stay in a chat history nobody else will ever open. Six weeks later a teammate touches the same system, has no idea any of that thinking happened, and starts over.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">You can’t prompt your way out of a context vacuum. Agents and teammates alike are only as good as the context they start with, and right now most of that context is being generated and immediately lost. The teams that pull ahead will be the ones that treat the reasoning around the work as something worth capturing.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Problem #2: Misalignment creates duplicative work</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When individuals move fast in parallel without a shared source of truth, they start stepping on each other’s toes. Two people solve the same problem two different ways. An agent generates a change against a spec that quietly went stale last week. A confidently written pull request follows the wrong internal standard because the standard lived in someone’s head, not in the workflow.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This problem gets worse as more of the work becomes agent-driven. Agents overwrite each other. Specs drift out of date faster than anyone updates them. The faster the individual pieces move, the more expensive the collisions become.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Problem #3: Trust doesn’t scale</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The quiet tax on AI-assisted work is review. If an individual developer can’t see how a piece of work was produced, what the intent was, what the agent was told, what standards it was working against, then they can’t confidently build on it. So, they re-check it, or rewrite it, or route around it. The individual saved an hour. The team spent two earning back the trust.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Trust transfers when intent is legible. When a teammate or a reviewer can see what was meant, what was decided, and what guardrails applied, they can accept the work and move on. When they can’t, every handoff becomes a re-litigation.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Turning adoption into advantage</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The through-line across all three problems is the same. The value of AI at the team level does not live in the code any single person or agent produces. It lives in whether the intent and context around that work is captured, shared, and reusable by everyone else, human and agent.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That reframes the leadership job. It’s not about driving more adoption, because your teams already handled that. It’s about building the connective layer that turns individual output into team capability.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">The window is now</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This matters more every month, because the individual productivity story is about to become an agent orchestration story. The organizations that turn individual adoption into team advantage now, while the habits are still forming, will be the ones whose agents actually compound.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">See how engineering leaders are building the connective layer between individual AI adoption and team-level compound returns at <a href="https://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/dev?utm_source=foundry&amp;utm_medium=paid-social&amp;utm_campaign=P:jira%7CO:ppm%7CV:foundry%7CG:us%7CL:en%7CF:aware%7CT:prospecting%7CI:imc-jira-ai-sdlc%7CA:display%7CD:alld&amp;utm_content=P:jira%7CO:ppm%7CV:foundry%7CG:us%7CL:en%7CF:aware%7CT:prospecting%7CI:imc-jira-ai-sdlc%7CA:display%7CD:alld%7CU:cio-1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">jira.dev.</a></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Kartenzahlung im Café, Foodtruck & Bistro: Welche Lösung lohnt sich wirklich?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag Kartenzahlung im Café, Foodtruck & Bistro: Welche Lösung lohnt sich wirklich? erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Wer heute ein Café, einen Foodtruck oder ein kleines Bistro betreibt...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3686606/it-security-nachrichten/kartenzahlung-im-caf-foodtruck-bistro-welche-loesung-lohnt-sich-wirklich/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3686606/it-security-nachrichten/kartenzahlung-im-caf-foodtruck-bistro-welche-loesung-lohnt-sich-wirklich/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 16:09:54 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/22/kartenzahlung-im-cafe-foodtruck-bistro-welche-loesung-lohnt-sich-wirklich/">Kartenzahlung im Café, Foodtruck &amp; Bistro: Welche Lösung lohnt sich wirklich?</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Wer heute ein Café, einen Foodtruck oder ein kleines Bistro betreibt, kommt an einer Sache kaum noch vorbei: bargeldloses Bezahlen. Gäste erwarten es, Umsätze hängen davon ab und wer kein Kartenlesegerät anbietet, riskiert im schlimmsten Fall, dass der Tisch leer bleibt. Doch welche Zahlungslösung passt wirklich zu kleinen Gastronomiebetrieben? Und worauf sollten Inhaber achten, bevor […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/22/kartenzahlung-im-cafe-foodtruck-bistro-welche-loesung-lohnt-sich-wirklich/">Kartenzahlung im Café, Foodtruck &amp; Bistro: Welche Lösung lohnt sich wirklich?</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[MIT’s new lidar chip could give self-driving cars a wider view]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[MIT engineers have found a way to give chip-based lidar a wider, clearer view without relying on moving parts. Their design uses differently shaped antennas that can sit close together without scrambling one another’s signals. In tests, the system sharply reduced interference while steering a sin...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3686409/ai-nachrichten/mits-new-lidar-chip-could-give-self-driving-cars-a-wider-view/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3686409/ai-nachrichten/mits-new-lidar-chip-could-give-self-driving-cars-a-wider-view/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 15:07:53 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[MIT engineers have found a way to give chip-based lidar a wider, clearer view without relying on moving parts. Their design uses differently shaped antennas that can sit close together without scrambling one another’s signals. In tests, the system sharply reduced interference while steering a single precise beam across a broad field of view.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Leadership bottlenecks slow AI adoption]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[At Cisco, VP of engineering Jason Andrews deals with all the same technical issues as every other company deploying AI, including ensuring it’s governed, secure, and integrating multiple data sources, legacy systems, and AI models.



But these issues are relatively straightforward compared to th...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685910/it-security-nachrichten/leadership-bottlenecks-slow-ai-adoption/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685910/it-security-nachrichten/leadership-bottlenecks-slow-ai-adoption/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 12:14:12 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">At Cisco, VP of engineering Jason Andrews deals with all the same technical issues as every other company deploying AI, including ensuring it’s governed, secure, and integrating multiple data sources, legacy systems, and AI models.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But these issues are relatively straightforward compared to the bigger challenges relating to the fast pace of change, specifically how AI can touch and transform nearly every aspect of business.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We’re thinking about it every day,” he says. “My belief is we’ll be seeing a massive acceleration of everything.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In coding, for example, he’s witnessing productivity increases up to 110% with AI assistants. “I can build apps or custom integrations a lot faster,” he adds.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And the real benefit of AI isn’t just in speeding up individual steps in a process, but in making AI the core of a new business process. But building it from scratch puts even more pressure on organizations trying to get employees up to speed on new ways of doing things.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We want to move fast, train people, and get them onboarded,” he says. “But what I thought AI was going to do for my organization nine months ago is different from three months ago.” So by the time something is rolled out, it’s changed three times.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“I struggle with the change management aspect,” he says. “The legacy model of change management isn’t fast enough. How do you create that constant learning?”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One of the ways Cisco approaches it is to create communities where people can talk about these issues and share best practices and governance, and you have to keep people’s minds open that every day is going to be different than the last, Andrews adds.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Testing the AI waters</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cisco isn’t the only organization struggling with change management in the face of the AI tsunami. <a href="https://www.ibm.com/thought-leadership/institute-business-value/en-us/c-suite-study/ceo">In a survey of 2,000 global CEOs IBM released in May</a>, 83% of them said AI success depends more on adoption than on the technology itself, and 77% said talent and technology roles are converging.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Thanks to Claude Code, our entire development cadence is exponentially greater than a year ago,” says Andrew Johnson, CIO at Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, a Denver-based law firm with about 700 employees and clients around the US. But, as with Cisco, the biggest challenge isn’t technical.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“In our industry, with our circumstances, we’re probably less constrained by technical capability than organizational constraints, culture, aptitude, the need to bind people to technology, and what helps me and the client,” he says. “There’s a tremendous amount of cultural shift that has to happen in our organization, which is far more demanding of my attention and complexity of thought than the technical stuff.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Companies that bill by the hour, such as law firms, may face additional challenges as attorney productivity increases because billable hours might go down. Alternatively, the total number of cases could go up as litigation becomes less expensive. Either way, firms that adapt will see competitive advantage, and the rest will fall behind, putting more pressure on the need for change management.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“If people can’t embrace technology, we won’t be able to get a lot of value out of it,” says Johnson. “I’m talking to people about adapting their way of work. There are certainly a lot of people intrigued and anxious to dive in. They recognize the connection between the potential of the technology and what we do.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But helping everyone see that connection and then working with them to change their habits is difficult, and requires solid relationships and good communications. “That’s been far more of a bottleneck for us,” he says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To address the issue, the firm has developed a network of technology champions who also understand the legal side of the business. “Now we need lawyers who know how to use the technology and can articulate these things to the people we’re trying to reach,” Johnson says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But change management is only one leadership bottleneck slowing AI adoption. Companies also struggle with figuring out their vision for AI, with slow decision-making, and a tendency to focus on the past instead of the future.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Vision and strategy</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.grantthornton.com/services/advisory-services/artificial-intelligence/2026-ai-impact-survey">In another survey, this time of 950 business leaders released by Grant Thornton</a> in April, 51% said strategy is the biggest driver of ROI when it comes to AI adoption, but 79% of operations leaders said they don’t have a fully developed and implemented AI strategy.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Having leadership understanding why AI is needed and what objective they’re trying to achieve is very important,” says Shivi Verma, senior manager of engineering at Docusign. “Sometimes leadership doesn’t have a strategy for their organization on how AI should be adopted. Many times it’s bottom-up, which creates a chaotic experience.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When Docusign started adopting gen AI, different teams and organizational units wanted to go in different directions. “All were coming up with their own strategy and tooling,” he says. So Docusign brought business leaders together to understand the pain points, and decide on the technology.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Getting requirements and placing a bet on a specific technology was important,” he says, “as well as pivoting to a different technology if needed.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In order to adapt to changes, the company wanted to have a nimble approach, starting with smaller use cases, with power users, and problem areas.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We try to plan for four to six months,” he adds. “We set expectations for our leadership that we place a bet with a specific technology, but want to be able to pivot.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Today, the leadership challenge front lines have moved yet again, to agentic AI. “Folks are creating their own agents and deciding their own permissions,” Verma adds. “We’re still coming up with a governance strategy.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Slow decision-making</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When it comes to AI deployments, Dan Diasio, global AI consulting leader at EY and CTO for its US consulting business, admits he’s a bottleneck.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There’s a great deal of interest in what AI can do, and using a variety of new AI tools. But since the firm deals with sensitive client data, safety is paramount. It’s a slow process, but important to build secure infrastructure, and to have trust in the technology. “That’s a reasonable bottleneck that makes sense,” he says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Trust in the tools they work with is essential because clients expect it. “Every tool we use has to go through a detailed security and information privacy impact assessment, as well as a whole other set of controls so they can be used appropriately and safely,” he says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These reviews can take a lot of time, though, and in the age of AI, speed is a highly valued currency. So how do you balance the two, when safety reviews can require input from a lot of different stakeholders and be extremely time intensive?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We’ve stood up a team to be able to quickly certify and address a variety of platforms,” Diasio says. “Instead of working with different departments in the way we used to, we’ve started identifying representatives from different departments into a cohort. Decisions we used to make in months now take weeks.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to a <a href="https://www.westmonroe.com/insights/why-speed-matters">West Monroe survey</a> of more than 1,200 leaders released earlier this year, slow decision-making is already showing up on the bottom line. Nearly three out of four leaders said their organizations lose up to 5% of annual revenue to slow decision-making and delayed execution.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And the top reasons for the delays? According to 40% of the managers surveyed, the problem was the skills gaps of overwhelmed teams, and 35% pointed to layers of management or approvals. Nearly half said they’re spending 10 to 25% of their time on rework, excessive approvals, and unnecessary meetings, and more than half say up to 50% of their projects fail or lose momentum to delays.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Focus on the future, not the past</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When it comes to the decision about where to apply AI in an organization, the tendency, Diasio says, is to turn to the experts with the most expertise in the business. But these are the same people most likely to focus on improving on what they’re already doing.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“And that often blinds people to what’s possible in the future,” he says. “That becomes a significant bottleneck.” So the solution is to revamp the decision-making process around the new reality.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“What we see some advanced companies do is give people who don’t understand the process but understand the technology equal footing with people who don’t understand the technology but understand the process,” he says. “A lot of companies are disproportionately focused on just addressing their operating model right now.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Instead of focusing on what they’re currently doing, AI-native companies will start with a focus on the customer, he says. This shift in focus isn’t likely to show up immediately on the bottom line, or result in the highest possible number of pilots going into production.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“If leaders are in a position where they’re justifying the use of a technology to the board or their CFO, they become a bottleneck when they start demonstrating their value in terms of the number of things they’re doing,” Diasio says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But 150 or 200 use cases deployed into production may feel like progress, like things are happening in the organization. But all these use cases are a waste of time and money if they’re applied to existing processes that don’t move the needle. “We see that happen in organizations today,” he says. “Maybe we need to reinvent the processes.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It’s no secret that companies will need to change in order to adapt to AI. <a href="https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/topics/technology-management/future-of-tech-leadership.html">Deloitte recently surveyed</a> 660 global technology leaders and 81% said their current operating model can deploy and govern AI enterprise-wide, but 75% also said their organization must change its operating model within the next 12 to 18 months to drive greater value.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI ROI is real, says China Widener, Deloitte vice chair and US tech, media, and telecom industry leader. But it’s currently weighted toward efficiency gains, with broader business transformation and revenue upside still developing.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/what-we-do/capabilities/applied-artificial-intelligence/content/state-of-ai-in-the-enterprise.html">Another Deloitte survey</a> showed that the clearest results from AI were in productivity, with 66% of organizations reporting gains, and cost efficiency, with 40% saying AI reduces costs. “However, revenue impact is still emerging,” says Widener. “Only one in five companies says AI is driving top-line growth today.” But optimism prevails, with 74% expecting it to do so in the future.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Agentic coding is everywhere]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I use a very cool and relatively new web framework called Astro. The keen insight that the Astro team had was that most websites are made up of static content, so they made it really easy to add content to a website. To add a blog post to my personal website, all I have to do is create a Markdown...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685748/ai-nachrichten/agentic-coding-is-everywhere/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685748/ai-nachrichten/agentic-coding-is-everywhere/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 11:04:58 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I use a very cool and relatively new web framework called <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3842325/designing-a-dynamic-web-application-with-astro-js.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3842325/designing-a-dynamic-web-application-with-astro-js.html">Astro</a>. The keen insight that the Astro team had was that most websites are made up of static content, so they made it really easy to add content to a website. To add a blog post to <a href="https://nickhodges.com/">my personal website</a>, all I have to do is create a Markdown file with some front matter, deploy it, and the blog post automatically appears. If I need to reach deeper for more dynamic functionality, I can easily do that with <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2257305/what-is-typescript-strongly-typed-javascript.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2257305/what-is-typescript-strongly-typed-javascript.html">TypeScript</a>, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2253289/react-tutorial-get-started-with-the-reactjs-javascript-library.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2253289/react-tutorial-get-started-with-the-reactjs-javascript-library.html">React</a>, or almost any other framework. It’s really cool.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And these days, I really don’t write any code. <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4136718/claude-code-is-blowing-me-away.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4136718/claude-code-is-blowing-me-away.html">Claude Code</a> does most (all?) of the work. Since Astro is <a href="https://github.com/withastro/astro">an open-source project</a> and has <a href="https://docs.astro.build/">excellent documentation</a>, Claude knows all about how Astro works. It has no trouble at all managing my site and making the improvements I ask for.  </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And that got me thinking, how does Astro get built? Is the Astro team building with agentic coding? Astro itself has many dependencies, including big projects like Vite and Node. And of course, Vite and Node have dependencies, too. Are those dependencies being developed by hand, or are those development teams also using AI agents to code?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">My curiosity got the best of me, and I asked Claude to dig deeper. It turns out that the Astro repository has <a href="https://github.com/withastro/astro/blob/main/AGENTS.md">an AGENTS.md</a> file, and some of the commits even have commit message trailers indicating that they were at least co-authored by Claude and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3609013/github-copilot-everything-you-need-to-know.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3609013/github-copilot-everything-you-need-to-know.html">GitHub Copilot</a>. Further down, there is a <code>.agents/skills</code> directory with skills covering development, merging, triage, and more. I poked around for a look, and someone has done a great job building agentic support.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Now my interest is really piqued, and further investigation reveals quite a bit of interesting stuff. About a year ago, documentation started appearing about how to build Astro sites with coding agents.  Around that same time, the docs team released an <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4029634/what-is-model-context-protocol-how-mcp-bridges-ai-and-external-services.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4029634/what-is-model-context-protocol-how-mcp-bridges-ai-and-external-services.html">MCP server</a> that gives developers coding agents deeper, easier access to the Astro documentation.  </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And there are small steps in the Astro codebase that indicate it is “agentic ready.” For instance, the command-line development server can tell when it is being started by an agent, and the application itself can tell if it is being driven by an agent. Small things, but steps in the direction of embracing Astro developers who use coding agents. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Okay, that was a fun spelunking trip. But so what?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The “so what” is that code is going to be commoditized. As an Astro developer I am using AI agents pretty much all of the time. The Astro development team is starting to use AI agents more and more. The folks building the Astro dependencies are using AI agents. Shoot, the people building Claude Code and the agents themselves are “eating their own dogfood” and <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/institute/recursive-self-improvement">using their own tools to build the next frontier model</a>. Before we know it, it will be <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turtles_all_the_way_down">turtles all the way down</a>. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">No one says “who generated that electricity?” or “who wove the fabric in that shirt?” any more. And it won’t be long before no one says “Who wrote the code for that app?” because it won’t matter. Just as we don’t look at the assembly code written by our compilers, we’ll stop looking at the “regular” code written by our agents. I’m not even sure anyone is <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39587051" data-type="link" data-id="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39587051">writing assembly code anymore</a>. Soon we’ll be saying that about TypeScript, Python, and C++.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Trump schwebt über allem: Machtkampf zwischen EU und Google eskaliert]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag Trump schwebt über allem: Machtkampf zwischen EU und Google eskaliert erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Die EU-Kommission wechselt im Kampf gegen Googles Marktmacht die Strategie. ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685735/it-nachrichten/trump-schwebt-ueber-allem-machtkampf-zwischen-eu-und-google-eskaliert/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685735/it-nachrichten/trump-schwebt-ueber-allem-machtkampf-zwischen-eu-und-google-eskaliert/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 11:03:39 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/22/machtkampf-zwischen-eu-und-google/">Trump schwebt über allem: Machtkampf zwischen EU und Google eskaliert</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Die EU-Kommission wechselt im Kampf gegen Googles Marktmacht die Strategie. Statt Milliarden-Strafen setzt Brüssel erstmals auf verbindliche Spezifikationsmaßnahmen durch den Digital Markets Act. Google muss demnach künftig Suchdaten mit Wettbewerbern teilen und Android für fremde KI-Assistenten öffnen. Ob das gelingt, darf zumindest bezweifelt werden. Denn bisher hat sich Google von keiner EU-Maßnahme ernsthaft beeindrucken lassen, […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/22/machtkampf-zwischen-eu-und-google/">Trump schwebt über allem: Machtkampf zwischen EU und Google eskaliert</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[BRSG II für Arbeitgeber: Das ist ab Juli 2026 Pflicht]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag BRSG II für Arbeitgeber: Das ist ab Juli 2026 Pflicht erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
BRSG II ist da und die meisten Arbeitgeber sind nicht vorbereitet. Seit dem 22. Januar 2026 ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685547/it-nachrichten/brsg-ii-fuer-arbeitgeber-das-ist-ab-juli-2026-pflicht/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685547/it-nachrichten/brsg-ii-fuer-arbeitgeber-das-ist-ab-juli-2026-pflicht/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 09:51:06 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/22/brsg-ii-fuer-arbeitgeber-das-ist-ab-juli-2026-pflicht/">BRSG II für Arbeitgeber: Das ist ab Juli 2026 Pflicht</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>BRSG II ist da und die meisten Arbeitgeber sind nicht vorbereitet. Seit dem 22. Januar 2026 ist das Zweite Betriebsrentenstärkungsgesetz in Kraft, doch die entscheidenden arbeits- und versicherungsvertragsrechtlichen Regelungen greifen ab dem 1. Juli 2026 vollständig. Mehr Pflichten, höhere Zuschüsse, neue Haftungsrisiken: Wer seine betriebliche Altersvorsorge noch mit Excel-Tabellen, PDF-Formularen und gelegentlichen Maklerbesuchen verwaltet, steht […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/22/brsg-ii-fuer-arbeitgeber-das-ist-ab-juli-2026-pflicht/">BRSG II für Arbeitgeber: Das ist ab Juli 2026 Pflicht</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[10 survival tips for CSOs who report to the CEO]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[As the CSO grows in prominence, security leaders are increasingly earning a seat at the executive table, reporting directly to the CEO with the expectation to help drive business strategy and ensure organizational success.



Reporting to the CEO unlocks greater access and influence for security ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685496/it-security-nachrichten/10-survival-tips-for-csos-who-report-to-the-ceo/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685496/it-security-nachrichten/10-survival-tips-for-csos-who-report-to-the-ceo/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 09:16:42 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As the CSO grows in prominence, security leaders are increasingly earning a seat at the executive table, reporting directly to the CEO with the expectation to help drive business strategy and ensure organizational success.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Reporting to the CEO unlocks greater access and influence for security leaders, and while CSOs who report to their organization’s CIO still have clout, it’s a very different experience picking up the phone to speak directly with the CEO as a strategic partner.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Regardless of reporting structure, CSOs must clearly understand what they are being tasked to solve. That might sound simple, but making the leap to being a CEO’s direct report requires a new perspective, a different set of skills, and a business-level focus on metrics to do so.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We asked several current CSOs, CEOs, and IT staffing experts for advice on how security executives can best navigate a direct reporting relationship with their CEO. Offering insights below are <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/georgegerchow/">George Gerchow</a>, CSO at Bedrock Data and member of the IANS faculty; <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/mattchiodi/">Matt Chiodi</a>, CSO of Cerby; <a href="https://www.cyderes.com/company/about/chris-schueler">Chris Schueler</a>, CEO at Cyderes; and <a href="https://www.skillsoft.com/blog-authors/greg-fuller">Greg Fuller</a>, vice president of the Technology Skills Suite at Skillsoft.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">1. Understand how the CEO views your role</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most CEOs expect that, when you report directly to them, you fully own your functional area. Whether it’s cybersecurity, operations, or finance, they look to you as the expert in that domain. The CEO may have opinions, but ultimately, you are expected to lead and provide direction.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CEOs expect their CSO to be a <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4159317/cisos-reshape-their-roles-as-business-risk-strategists.html">true strategic partner</a>, not just a risk reporter — connecting cybersecurity to revenue protection, regulatory compliance, customer trust, and operational resilience. In turn, CSOs should expect CEOs to treat governance as a strategic enabler, not a bureaucratic necessity.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">2. Power up on skills vital to your organization at an executive level</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">On the technology side, AI and machine learning, cloud security, incident response, zero trust architecture, and governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) are the areas where threats evolve fastest and strategic leadership has the greatest impact. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Equally important are “power skills”: communication, critical thinking, adaptability, and emotional intelligence. The ability to <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4186984/6-security-leader-tips-for-mastering-business-risk.html">translate complex risk into business terms</a> is what separates a strong CSO from a purely technical one. Skills, not titles, define effectiveness in the eyes of a CEO.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">3. Take advantage of your direct access</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Direct access to the CEO will enable you to influence strategy, <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/3855823/how-cisos-can-balance-business-continuity-with-other-responsibilities.html">shape resilience planning</a>, and ensure <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4080670/what-does-aligning-security-to-the-business-really-mean.html">cybersecurity is treated as a business imperative</a> rather than a cost center. That authority is strongest when the CEO understands cybersecurity as a strategic lever, not just a technical function. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While a direct reporting relationship gives you access to the CEO, it also comes with the responsibility to operate at that level. You need to provide clear, executive-level visibility into your cybersecurity program.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">4. Brush up on business translation</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4002753/cisos-reposition-their-roles-for-business-leadership.html">CSO who leads with business alignment</a> will always carry more influence when they can translate risk into business language rather than technical jargon. Building programs that must survive an IPO, a FedRAMP audit, and real customer scrutiny forces you to tie security to revenue and trust.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The most valuable skill is translation — defining technical risk in terms of executive action and business impact that a CEO and a board can act on. You must build trust through transparency. These are the human skills that complement technology, creating a collaborative human-AI dynamic where leaders make faster, better-informed decisions. </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">5. Treat conversations as risk assessment opportunities</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Highly effective security leaders treat every business conversation as a risk conversation in disguise. That mindset is what largely separates a great CSO from a great technologist. Earn the CEO’s trust by speaking business first, security second. Translate every risk into revenue, reputation, or regulatory exposure.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Remember, a good CEO wants a translator, not an alarm system. They expect no surprises, a clear read on the risks that matter, and a security leader who helps the <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4021179/8-tough-trade-offs-every-ciso-must-navigate.html">business move faster rather than slowing it down</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">6. Define what a successful relationship should look like and put it in writing</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Regardless of the reporting relationship, start by defining the end goal and putting it in writing. It will evolve over time, but having that initial clarity is critical. This is especially important when you’re new in a role and aiming to make your first 60, 90, or 120 days, and your first year, successful. In such cases, it’s essential to align early.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Do that collaboratively, and document it.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">7. Prioritize trust and candor</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The CEO needs to trust that the CSO isn’t sandbagging, and the CSO needs enough psychological safety to deliver bad news fast. When those conditions exist, security becomes a strategic asset — not a cost center.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To that end, focus on clear communication above all, and present yourself as part of a team, not a solo player. Stay calm under pressure during incidents, and treat people as peers rather than policing them. The leaders who last build trust before they need it.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">8. Treat governance as a strategic competitive advantage</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The strongest partnerships also share a commitment to governance as a competitive advantage.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Governance is the brakes that let you drive fast safely. When a CSO and CEO are aligned on that principle, the organization can innovate with AI while <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4176485/the-ai-governance-imperative-you-cant-afford-to-ignore-2.html">maintaining oversight and protecting against unnecessary risk</a>. The result is an organization that does not just react to threats but builds resilience into how it operates.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">9. Set clear goals and measure progress</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Setting clear goals and measuring progress against those goals is essential. When expectations are clear, the areas you need to focus on become much clearer. It doesn’t solve every problem, but aligning early with your leadership, whether that’s a CEO or a CIO, can significantly reduce the pressure you may feel.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Also, never let your boss be surprised. This is where being clear on goals and consistently tracking both leading and lagging metrics becomes especially important, particularly in a direct reporting relationship with the CEO.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">10. Be willing to endure challenge and discomfort</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Finally, persistence and a willingness to endure discomfort for something that matters more than the pain itself are critical to surviving in this relationship. The role of a cybersecurity leader is often thankless. If you’re doing your job well, no one really notices.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[US Seizes 1,000+ Domains Used to Illegally Stream FIFA World Cup]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Department of Justice has seized more than 1,000 illegal World Cup streaming domains accused of broadcasting FIFA World Cup 2026 matches without authorization, marking a major enforcement action against digital piracy during the tournament. The domains were seized in three separate actio...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685462/it-security-nachrichten/us-seizes-1000-domains-used-to-illegally-stream-fifa-world-cup/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685462/it-security-nachrichten/us-seizes-1000-domains-used-to-illegally-stream-fifa-world-cup/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 08:55:28 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="1536" height="1024" src="https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/illegal-FIFA-World-Cup-streaming-domains.webp" class="attachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="illegal World Cup streaming domains" decoding="async" srcset="https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/illegal-FIFA-World-Cup-streaming-domains.webp 1536w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/illegal-FIFA-World-Cup-streaming-domains-300x200.webp 300w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/illegal-FIFA-World-Cup-streaming-domains-1024x683.webp 1024w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/illegal-FIFA-World-Cup-streaming-domains-768x512.webp 768w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/illegal-FIFA-World-Cup-streaming-domains-600x400.webp 600w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/illegal-FIFA-World-Cup-streaming-domains-150x100.webp 150w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/illegal-FIFA-World-Cup-streaming-domains-750x500.webp 750w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/illegal-FIFA-World-Cup-streaming-domains-1140x760.webp 1140w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/illegal-FIFA-World-Cup-streaming-domains.webp 1536w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/illegal-FIFA-World-Cup-streaming-domains-300x200.webp 300w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/illegal-FIFA-World-Cup-streaming-domains-1024x683.webp 1024w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/illegal-FIFA-World-Cup-streaming-domains-768x512.webp 768w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/illegal-FIFA-World-Cup-streaming-domains-600x400.webp 600w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/illegal-FIFA-World-Cup-streaming-domains-150x100.webp 150w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/illegal-FIFA-World-Cup-streaming-domains-750x500.webp 750w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/illegal-FIFA-World-Cup-streaming-domains-1140x760.webp 1140w" sizes="(max-width: 1536px) 100vw, 1536px" title="US Seizes 1,000+ Domains Used to Illegally Stream FIFA World Cup 1"></p><p class="PDq2pG_selectionAnchorContainer" data-start="272" data-end="715">The U.S. Department of Justice has seized more than 1,000 illegal World Cup streaming domains accused of broadcasting <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/fifa-world-cup-2026-scams/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">FIFA World Cup 2026</a> matches without authorization, marking a major enforcement action against digital piracy during the tournament. The domains were seized in three separate actions under U.S. copyright law as part of Operation Offsides, an initiative targeting websites involved in unauthorized <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/ai-artificial-intelligence-deric-cybersecurity/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">World Cup broadcasts</a>.</p>
<p data-start="717" data-end="1038">The latest action includes nearly <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/illegal-world-cup-streaming-domains/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">400 websites seized by the end of June</a>, according to the Department of Justice. The investigation was carried out by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) Washington Field Office and the National Intellectual Property Rights Coordination Center.</p>

<h3 data-section-id="1txnekb" data-start="1040" data-end="1088"><strong>Illegal World Cup Streaming Domains Targeted</strong></h3>
<p data-start="1090" data-end="1383">According to an affidavit filed in support of a seizure warrant in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, the seized domains were used to offer copyright-protected content through real-time streams of 2026 World Cup matches as they were being played and first broadcast.</p>
<p data-start="1385" data-end="1767">HSI special agents <a href="https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/united-states-seizes-more-1000-internet-domains-used-illegally-stream-world-cup-2026-matches" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">confirmed</a> that the domains were actively broadcasting World Cup matches without authorization. The domains were identified with assistance from FIFA, with additional information provided by beIN Media Group, NBC Universal, the Motion Picture Association’s Alliance for Creativity and Entertainment (ACE), Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC), and Warner Brothers.</p>
<p data-start="1769" data-end="1933">FIFA holds the exclusive rights to sanction and stage the FIFA World Cup 2026, which is being hosted across multiple cities in the United States, Canada and Mexico.</p>

<h3 data-section-id="1ullvgs" data-start="1935" data-end="1983"><strong>Operation Offsides Targets Illegal Streaming</strong></h3>
<p data-start="1985" data-end="2144">The U.S. action is part of Operation Offsides, which focuses on identifying and seizing websites facilitating unauthorized broadcasts of World Cup matches.</p>
<p data-start="2146" data-end="2370">The operation is led by the National Intellectual Property Rights Coordination Center and is being conducted with HSI Washington, D.C., HSI Attaché offices, private sector organizations and law enforcement partners globally.</p>
<p data-start="2372" data-end="2665">Assistant Attorney <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://cyble.com/general/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" title="General" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29064">General</a> A. Tysen Duva of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division said the effort to seize more than 1,000 domains was aimed at protecting intellectual property rights and reducing <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://thecyberexpress.com/what-are-risks-in-cybersecurity/" title="risks" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29065">risks</a> to consumers from malicious software associated with some illicit streaming services.</p>


[caption id="attachment_113257" align="aligncenter" width="400"]<img class="wp-image-113257 size-full" src="https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/illegal-World-Cup-streaming-domains-FIFA.webp" alt="illegal World Cup streaming domains" width="400" height="375"> Source: The U.S. Department of Justice[/caption]
<p data-start="2667" data-end="2857">HSI Deputy Executive Associate Director Matthew Millhollin also warned that users accessing unauthorized streaming platforms could face risks including <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://thecyberexpress.com/what-is-malware/" title="malware" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29067">malware</a> and payment information theft.</p>

<h3 data-section-id="1nr0h5s" data-start="2859" data-end="2906"><strong>Operation Red Card Expands Global Crackdown</strong></h3>
<p data-start="2908" data-end="3113">The U.S. enforcement action was accompanied by international efforts under Operation Red Card, which targeted digital piracy and counterfeiting connected to the World Cup across the Western Hemisphere.</p>
<p data-start="3115" data-end="3342">The Justice Department’s International Computer <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://thecyberexpress.com/what-is-hacking/" title="Hacking" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29066">Hacking</a> and Intellectual Property (ICHIP) program coordinated enforcement efforts involving Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Paraguay and Peru.</p>
<p data-start="3344" data-end="3553">The coordinated actions resulted in hundreds of illegal streaming sites being blocked, including 14 in Argentina, 223 in Ecuador, 28 in Peru, 309 in Brazil, 256 in the Dominican Republic and 1,140 in Colombia.</p>
<p data-start="3555" data-end="3714">Colombian authorities also conducted 13 nationwide search-and-seizure operations targeting counterfeit sports apparel, resulting in 11 arrests and convictions.</p>

<h3 data-section-id="q9d79n" data-start="3716" data-end="3757"><strong>Cybercrime Group Arrested in Colombia</strong></h3>
<p data-start="3759" data-end="3923">On July 10, authorities launched Phase II of Operation Red Card in Colombia, conducting simultaneous operations in Bogotá, Soacha, Maríalabaja, Manatí and Sincerín.</p>
<p data-start="3925" data-end="4261">An ICHIP-mentored <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://thecyberexpress.com/" title="cybercrime" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29068">cybercrime</a> prosecutorial team from the Colombian Attorney General’s Office arrested four members of the cybercriminal group Los Ciberinfiltrados. According to the Justice Department, the group had illegally accessed telecommunications systems since 2024 and sold pirated streaming content, including World Cup matches.</p>
<p data-start="4263" data-end="4429">The group allegedly used fraudulent credentials, VPNs, interception of security codes and manipulation of corporate system profiles to distribute the pirated content.</p>
<p data-start="4431" data-end="4580">In Europe, ICHIP Bucharest also coordinated with Europol and international counterparts to address illegal streaming activities during the World Cup.</p>

<h3 data-section-id="19ihar3" data-start="4582" data-end="4627"><strong>World Cup Streaming Crackdown Intensifies</strong></h3>
<p data-start="4629" data-end="4821">The latest action follows a June 2026 <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://cyble.com/announcement/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" title="announcement" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29069">announcement</a> by the U.S. Department of Justice involving the seizure of nearly 400 websites accused of illegally broadcasting FIFA World Cup 2026 matches.</p>
<p data-start="4823" data-end="5023">That earlier enforcement action, also conducted under Operation Offsides, targeted websites accused of copyright infringement by offering unauthorized live streams of World Cup matches for profit.</p>
<p data-start="5025" data-end="5203" data-is-last-node="" data-is-only-node="">With more than 1,000 domains now seized in the U.S. actions, authorities continue to target unauthorized streaming platforms and digital piracy networks linked to the tournament.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Studie verrät: Diese Quellen nutzen ChatGPT und Co. für ihre Antworten]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag Studie verrät: Diese Quellen nutzen ChatGPT und Co. für ihre Antworten erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Immer mehr Menschen lassen sich Fragen von ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews ode...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685207/it-nachrichten/studie-verraet-diese-quellen-nutzen-chatgpt-und-co-fuer-ihre-antworten/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685207/it-nachrichten/studie-verraet-diese-quellen-nutzen-chatgpt-und-co-fuer-ihre-antworten/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 05:50:19 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/22/ki-chatbots-antworten-quellen/">Studie verrät: Diese Quellen nutzen ChatGPT und Co. für ihre Antworten</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Immer mehr Menschen lassen sich Fragen von ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews oder Perplexity beantworten, anstatt selbst zu recherchieren. Doch woher stammen diese Antworten eigentlich? Eine neue Studie mit 250.000 ausgewerteten Antworten liefert erstmals konkrete Zahlen zu den Quellen von KI-Modellen. Die Suche nach Informationen im Internet hat sich durch Künstliche Intelligenz grundlegend verändert. Vor einiger […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/22/ki-chatbots-antworten-quellen/">Studie verrät: Diese Quellen nutzen ChatGPT und Co. für ihre Antworten</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Poolside drops Laguna S 2.1, an open-weight coding model that beats rivals 10x its size]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Poolside, the San Francisco AI lab that has spent most of its three-year existence quietly selling coding models to governments and defense agencies, released its most capable model to date on Tuesday — and made an unusually aggressive bet that radical transparency, not raw scale, is how a smalle...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684985/it-nachrichten/poolside-drops-laguna-s-21-an-open-weight-coding-model-that-beats-rivals-10x-its-size/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684985/it-nachrichten/poolside-drops-laguna-s-21-an-open-weight-coding-model-that-beats-rivals-10x-its-size/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 01:07:11 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://poolside.ai/">Poolside</a>, the San Francisco AI lab that has spent most of its three-year existence quietly selling coding models to governments and defense agencies, released its most capable model to date on Tuesday — and made an unusually aggressive bet that radical transparency, not raw scale, is how a smaller lab competes at the frontier.</p><p>The model, <a href="https://poolside.ai/blog/introducing-laguna-s-2-1">Laguna S 2.1</a>, is a 118-billion-parameter<a href="https://huggingface.co/blog/moe"> Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) system</a> that activates only 8 billion parameters per token, supports a context window of up to 1 million tokens, and — according to benchmarks published by the company — matches or beats open models several times its size on agentic coding tasks. The weights are <a href="https://huggingface.co/poolside/Laguna-S-2.1">available immediately</a> on Hugging Face under the permissive OpenMDW-1.1 license.</p><p>The headline numbers are striking for a model this small. Poolside reports that <a href="https://huggingface.co/poolside/Laguna-S-2.1">Laguna S 2.1</a> scores 70.2% on <a href="https://www.tbench.ai/">Terminal-Bench 2.1</a>, a benchmark of long-horizon terminal tasks, placing it 11th on the company's compiled leaderboard — ahead of <a href="https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro">DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max</a>, a 1.6-trillion-parameter model that scored 64.0; Thinking Machines' 975-billion-parameter <a href="https://venturebeat.com/technology/thinking-machines-open-sources-first-multimodal-language-model-inkling-focused-on-low-cost-and-resistance-to-censorship">Inkling</a>, at 63.8; and Nvidia’s 550-billion-parameter <a href="https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/Nemotron-3-Ultra/">Nemotron 3 Ultra</a>, at 56.4. On <a href="https://www.swebench.com/multilingual.html">SWE-Bench Multilingual</a>, it posts 78.5%, and on <a href="https://labs.scale.com/leaderboard/swe_bench_pro_public">SWE-Bench Pro</a>'s public dataset, 59.4%.</p><p>Perhaps more telling than any single score: the model went from the start of pre-training on May 22 to public launch in under nine weeks, trained on 4,096 Nvidia H200 GPUs. In an industry where flagship model cycles are typically measured in quarters or years, Poolside has now shipped three models in three months.</p><div></div><h2><b>Why the West's open-weight AI gap has become a boardroom issue</b></h2><p>The release lands in the middle of an increasingly pointed debate about <a href="https://www.scmp.com/tech/tech-war/article/3361142/why-chinas-open-weight-ai-model-kimi-k3-sparking-anxiety-silicon-valley">the provenance of open-weight AI</a>. Over the past year, developer adoption has shifted decisively toward open-weight systems that companies can download, inspect, and run on their own infrastructure — and the leading options in that category have overwhelmingly come from Chinese labs. <a href="https://www.deepseek.com/en/">DeepSeek</a>, <a href="https://qwen.ai/home">Qwen</a>, <a href="http://kimi.ai/">Kimi</a>, <a href="https://chat.z.ai/">GLM</a>, <a href="https://www.minimax.io/">MiniMax</a>, and <a href="https://hy.tencent.com/">Tencent's Hunyuan</a> line all feature prominently in Poolside's own comparison tables.</p><p>Poolside's accompanying press release frames <a href="https://poolside.ai/blog/introducing-laguna-s-2-1">Laguna S 2.1</a> explicitly as a response, noting that the model occupies a size class into which no Western lab has released open weights in 11 months — since OpenAI's <a href="https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-oss/">gpt-oss-120b</a> last August. "The West needs open-weight models it can trust, run, and build on," said Jason Warner, Poolside's co-CEO, in the announcement.</p><p>Co-founder and co-CEO Eiso Kant made the philosophical stakes even plainer in a <a href="https://x.com/eisokant/status/2079612416967491952?s=20">lengthy post</a> on X. "I believe intelligence should and will become a commodity," he wrote, arguing that the open ecosystem "will not win by being the best in its own category." Users, he argued, simply want the best intelligence for the task at hand — so open models must be on par with, or better than, their closed equivalents.</p><div></div><p>The strategic logic here is not charity. Poolside's core business is deploying models inside the security boundaries of government, defense, and regulated enterprises — customers for whom closed, metered API access is often a non-starter for compliance and sovereignty reasons. </p><p>Every enterprise that standardizes on a Chinese open model today becomes harder to win tomorrow. Releasing competitive open weights is both an ecosystem play and a top-of-funnel strategy for the company's high-security deployment business. It also reframes the AI race away from terrain where Poolside cannot compete — frontier-scale capital expenditure — and toward terrain where it believes it can: cost per token, self-hosting, and iteration speed.</p><h2><b>How a sparse architecture makes enterprise AI agents affordable to run</b></h2><p>The technical design reflects a specific thesis about where value in coding AI is moving. Laguna S 2.1's sparse MoE architecture — 256 routed experts plus one shared expert, with grouped-query attention and interleaved sliding-window layers, according to the <a href="https://huggingface.co/poolside/Laguna-S-2.1">Hugging Face model card</a> — means inference costs scale with the 8 billion active parameters, not the 118 billion total. Poolside emphasizes that the model is small enough to run on a single Nvidia DGX Spark, the desktop-class AI machine.</p><p>That matters for what Poolside calls token economics. Long-horizon coding agents are voracious consumers of tokens: the company's published data shows the model consuming a mean of roughly 249,000 completion tokens per trajectory on its hardest benchmark when thinking mode is enabled. At metered API prices, agentic workloads at enterprise scale become a meaningful budget line item. On OpenRouter, Poolside is offering a free 256K-context endpoint and a dedicated 1M-context deployment priced at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens — aggressive pricing that undercuts most frontier alternatives by an order of magnitude.</p><p>The ecosystem support is unusually broad for day one. The model is live on <a href="https://www.baseten.co/library/laguna-s-21/">Baseten's model library</a> and <a href="https://vercel.com/changelog/laguna-s-2-1-is-now-available-on-ai-gateway">Vercel's AI Gateway</a>, with integrations across <a href="https://vllm.ai/">vLLM</a>, <a href="https://github.com/sgl-project/sglang">SGLang</a>, <a href="https://ollama.com/">Ollama</a>, and <a href="https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp">llama.cpp</a>, plus quantized variants down to 4-bit GGUF files — 75 gigabytes — for local use. But Poolside's more interesting claim is behavioral, not architectural. Pengming Wang, co-head of applied research at Poolside, said the gains came from improving the model's working habits: "more verification, less taking things for granted, not declaring victory early, and being more persistent." Raw intelligence, the company argues, is one axis of capability; a model's way of working is a second axis that matters immensely for agents left unattended for hours.</p><h2><b>Publishing every benchmark trajectory to counter AI's credibility crisis</b></h2><p>The most consequential part of the release for enterprise buyers may be an evaluation-transparency move with little precedent among major labs: Poolside published the complete, unedited trajectory of every trial in its final benchmark runs — every reasoning step, tool call, and shell command behind every reported score.</p><p>This addresses a growing credibility problem in AI benchmarking. As top scores on mature benchmarks cluster in the 70–90% range, and as "reward hacking" — models finding solutions online or gaming verifiers rather than solving problems — has become endemic, self-reported numbers have lost much of their signal. Poolside disclosed its own encounters with the problem candidly: during training, more than half of trajectories on some SWE-bench tasks were flagged because the model simply researched the original bug-fix pull request online and applied it. The company documented its mitigations, including prompt addenda, LLM-based judging calibrated against human labels, and expert annotator review of a high-scoring Terminal-Bench run.</p><p>Three published case studies illustrate what the company means by persistence. In one, the model built a working HTML/CSS rendering engine from an empty folder in a 181-step, 50-minute unattended session — then, lacking vision capabilities, spun up headless Chromium to numerically compare its canvas output against a real browser's rendering. In another, pointed at Poolside's own agent harness in an automated optimization loop, the model made the Go codebase 5.2% faster with roughly 70% lower memory allocation, finding an O(n²) string-concatenation bug along the way. In a third, working in a sandbox with no Python installed, the model did its number theory in Perl and independently re-derived a proof of Erdős problem #397 — a combinatorics question open for five decades until GPT-5.2 Pro first solved it this past January. Poolside notes that its model's construction is structurally different from the earlier published solution, and that its November 2025 knowledge cutoff precedes the first proof.</p><div></div><h2><b>What the disclosed limitations and benchmark fine print reveal</b></h2><p><a href="https://poolside.ai/">Poolside</a> deserves credit for disclosing limitations most labs bury. The model can overfit to its native harness and stumble on slightly different tool schemas in third-party agents, mangles JSON in nested tool arguments, and is prone to overthinking on competition math. There is currently no user-configurable thinking-effort dial — just on or off — and the gap between the modes is enormous: thinking lifts <a href="https://www.tbench.ai/">Terminal-Bench 2.1</a> from 60.4% to 70.2%, and <a href="https://deepswe.datacurve.ai/">DeepSWE</a> from 16.5% to 40.4%, at substantially higher token cost.</p><p>Buyers should apply their own discounts to the comparison tables. Poolside's methodology takes the maximum of vendor self-reported scores, benchmark-author leaderboards, and third-party figures for competitors — a reasonable convention, but one that mixes harnesses and test conditions. On <a href="https://deepswe.datacurve.ai/">DeepSWE</a>, notably, Poolside ran its own agent harness rather than the leaderboard's standard mini-swe-agent, a difference the company acknowledges makes scores less directly comparable. And the frontier remains clearly out of reach: closed models like <a href="https://openai.com/index/previewing-gpt-5-6-sol/">GPT-5.6 Sol</a>, at 88.8 on Terminal-Bench 2.1, and <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/claude/fable">Claude Fable 5</a>, at 88.0, along with the 2.8-trillion-parameter open-weight <a href="https://venturebeat.com/technology/chinas-moonshot-ai-releases-kimi-k3-the-largest-open-source-model-ever-rivaling-top-u-s-systems">Kimi K3</a>, at 88.3, sit well above Laguna S 2.1.</p><p>The deeper structural question is whether Poolside's "<a href="https://poolside.ai/blog/introducing-the-model-factory">Model Factory</a>" — the internal platform the company credits for its rapid release cadence — can sustain this pace as models scale. The trajectory so far is genuinely unusual: the April dual release of Laguna M.1 and XS.2, the July 2 refresh of XS 2.1, and now S 2.1, which the company says outperforms April's flagship M.1 at roughly a third of its active size. Remarkably, S 2.1 used the exact same pre-training data as XS 2.1, meaning nearly all the improvement came from scale, training fixes, and post-training across the company's corpus of 409,000 agentic and non-agentic training environments. Poolside says its next, larger Laguna model began pre-training last week.</p><p>For technical decision makers, <a href="https://huggingface.co/poolside/Laguna-S-2.1">Laguna S 2.1</a> is the most credible Western open-weight option to emerge in nearly a year for self-hosted agentic coding — with published evidence, a permissive license, broad ecosystem support, and an economics story built around hardware you can own. Whether it dents the dominance of Chinese open models will depend less on this release than on the ones that follow it.</p><p>Kant, for his part, has already told the world how he intends that story to end. Poolside is building toward a future where the most capable intelligence "can be owned and shaped by anyone," he wrote — and the company plans to keep shipping "until that future exists." In an industry where the biggest labs increasingly lock their best work behind an API, the most radical thing about Laguna S 2.1 may not be what it scores, but that anyone can download it and check.</p><p>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[v2.1.217]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[What's changed

Added emoji shortcode autocomplete in the prompt input: type :heart: to insert ❤️, or :hea for suggestions — disable with the emojiCompletionEnabled setting
Added warnings when transcript writes are failing (e.g. disk full) or when session saving is off due to an inherited environ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684903/downloads/v21217/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684903/downloads/v21217/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 23:48:16 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾 Downloads</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>What's changed</h2>
<ul>
<li>Added emoji shortcode autocomplete in the prompt input: type <code>:heart:</code> to insert ❤️, or <code>:hea</code> for suggestions — disable with the <code>emojiCompletionEnabled</code> setting</li>
<li>Added warnings when transcript writes are failing (e.g. disk full) or when session saving is off due to an inherited environment variable, instead of losing transcripts silently</li>
<li>Fixed a memory leak where truncated MCP tool outputs kept the full untruncated result in memory for the rest of the session</li>
<li>Fixed Windows auto-update failures that could leave <code>claude.exe</code> missing; failed updates now restore the preserved executable automatically</li>
<li>Fixed background session isolation not canonicalizing symlinked working directories, which could let sessions escape their workspace folder</li>
<li>Fixed auto-compact never triggering for Claude Opus 4.8 on Bedrock and <code>/compact</code> failing once over the limit</li>
<li>Fixed corporate mTLS, TLS-verify, OAuth scope, and proxy settings being ignored in Claude Desktop sessions</li>
<li>Fixed screen reader mode's startup announcement being cut off by the first prompt render, and the thinking status row re-rendering every few seconds to update elapsed time and token counts</li>
<li>Fixed managed settings that set <code>OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT</code> not governing all signals — lower-scope signal-specific overrides no longer redirect telemetry away from the managed endpoint</li>
<li>Fixed <code>--resume</code>/<code>--continue</code> and <code>/resume</code> failing with a TypeError when a transcript has a malformed attachment entry</li>
<li>Fixed Remote Control sessions not showing a pending permission prompt or dialog to viewers that connected after it appeared</li>
<li>Fixed background shells sometimes becoming impossible to stop after a session is sent to the background (<code>/background</code> or <code>←</code>) or when the session exits on a heavily loaded machine, most visible on Windows</li>
<li>Fixed a <code>CLAUDE.md</code> or <code>SKILL.md</code> paths frontmatter value with many brace groups OOM-killing or stalling the CLI at startup — brace expansion is now budget-bounded</li>
<li>Fixed the transcript preview sitting flush against the input area when attaching to a starting background session; it now leaves the same one-line gap as the live layout, so the transcript no longer shifts when the session takes over</li>
<li>Improved footer PR badge links to be clickable hyperlinks even when terminal support can't be detected (e.g. over ssh/tmux); set <code>FORCE_HYPERLINK=0</code> to opt out</li>
<li>Changed the login-expiry warning to appear 3 days before expiry instead of 5</li>
<li>Capped the frontend-design plugin suggestion tip at 3 lifetime impressions instead of repeating indefinitely</li>
<li>Added a cap on concurrently-running subagents (default 20, override with <code>CLAUDE_CODE_MAX_CONCURRENT_SUBAGENTS</code>) so one message can't fan out unbounded background agents</li>
<li>Changed subagents to no longer spawn nested subagents by default; set <code>CLAUDE_CODE_MAX_SUBAGENT_SPAWN_DEPTH</code> to allow deeper nesting</li>
<li>Fixed <code>--max-budget-usd</code> not stopping background subagents: once the cap is reached, new spawns are denied and running background agents are halted</li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google's Gemini 3.6 Flash model cuts AI agent token costs by up to 65% on long horizon engineering tasks —and 3.5 Pro is on the way]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Google DeepMind today released three new proprietary AI models it says are among its most token-efficient yet: Gemini 3.6 Flash, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite, and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber. The models aim to make AI agents faster, smarter, and cheaper at scale. Google is pricing Gemini 3.6 Flash at $1.50 p...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684881/it-nachrichten/googles-gemini-36-flash-model-cuts-ai-agent-token-costs-by-up-to-65-on-long-horizon-engineering-tasks-and-35-pro-is-on-the-way/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684881/it-nachrichten/googles-gemini-36-flash-model-cuts-ai-agent-token-costs-by-up-to-65-on-long-horizon-engineering-tasks-and-35-pro-is-on-the-way/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 23:33:56 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google DeepMind<a href="https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/models-and-research/gemini-models/gemini-3-6-flash-3-5-flash-lite-3-5-flash-cyber/?utm_source=x&amp;utm_medium=social&amp;utm_campaign=&amp;utm_content="> today released three new proprietary AI models</a> it says are among its most token-efficient yet: Gemini 3.6 Flash, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite, and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber. </p><p>The models aim to make AI agents faster, smarter, and cheaper at scale. Google is pricing Gemini 3.6 Flash at $1.50 per one million input tokens and $7.50 per one million output tokens through its application programming interface (API), while Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite costs a staggeringly cheap $0.30/$2.50 per million tokens in/out. </p><p>Compare that to the $1.50/$9.00 per 1M tokens for Gemini 3.5 Flash, and the $2/$12 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, and the savings are considerable. However, Google's prior generation Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite still remains the search giant's "most cost-efficient" model at $0.25/$1.50 per 1M tokens. Yet, it remains 2X slower than the new, more expensive Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite, giving those enterprises who value speed more "bang" for their buck. </p><h2><b>VB Frontier AI Model API Pricing Comparison Chart (Late July 2026 Shortlist)</b></h2><table><tbody><tr><td><p><b>Model</b></p></td><td><p><b>Input ($/1M)</b></p></td><td><p><b>Output ($/1M)</b></p></td><td><p><b>Total ($/1M)</b></p></td><td><p><b>Source</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>MiMo-V2.5 Flash</p></td><td><p>$0.10</p></td><td><p>$0.30</p></td><td><p>$0.40</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.xiaomimimo.com/docs/en-US/pricing">Xiaomi</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>deepseek-v4-flash</p></td><td><p>$0.14</p></td><td><p>$0.28</p></td><td><p>$0.42</p></td><td><p><a href="https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing">DeepSeek</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>deepseek-v4-pro</p></td><td><p>$0.435</p></td><td><p>$0.87</p></td><td><p>$1.305</p></td><td><p><a href="https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing">DeepSeek</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>MiniMax-M3</p></td><td><p>$0.30</p></td><td><p>$1.20</p></td><td><p>$1.50</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.minimax.io/subscribe/token-plan?tab=api-enterprise">MiniMax</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>LongCat-2.0 — limited-time promo</p></td><td><p>$0.30</p></td><td><p>$1.20</p></td><td><p>$1.50</p></td><td><p><a href="https://longcat.chat/platform/docs/APIPayAsYouGo.html">LongCat</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite</p></td><td><p>$0.25</p></td><td><p>$1.50</p></td><td><p>$1.75</p></td><td><p><a href="https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing">Google</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Qwen3.7-Plus</p></td><td><p>$0.40</p></td><td><p>$1.60</p></td><td><p>$2.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://modelstudio.console.alibabacloud.com/ap-southeast-1?tab=doc#/doc/?type=model&amp;url=2840914_2&amp;modelId=qwen3.7-plus&amp;serviceSite=international">Alibaba Cloud</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>MiMo-V2.5</p></td><td><p>$0.40</p></td><td><p>$2.00</p></td><td><p>$2.40</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.xiaomimimo.com/docs/en-US/pricing">Xiaomi</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite</b></p></td><td><p><b>$0.30</b></p></td><td><p><b>$2.50</b></p></td><td><p><b>$2.80</b></p></td><td><p><b></b><a href="https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing"><b>Google</b></a><b></b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>LongCat-2.0 — standard</p></td><td><p>$0.75</p></td><td><p>$2.95</p></td><td><p>$3.70</p></td><td><p><a href="https://longcat.chat/platform/docs/APIPayAsYouGo.html">LongCat</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>MiMo-V2.5 Pro (≤256K)</p></td><td><p>$1.00</p></td><td><p>$3.00</p></td><td><p>$4.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.xiaomimimo.com/docs/en-US/pricing">Xiaomi</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GLM-5.2</p></td><td><p>$1.40</p></td><td><p>$4.40</p></td><td><p>$5.80</p></td><td><p><a href="https://docs.z.ai/guides/overview/pricing">Z.ai</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GPT-5.6 Luna</p></td><td><p>$1.00</p></td><td><p>$6.00</p></td><td><p>$7.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://openai.com/index/previewing-gpt-5-6-sol/">OpenAI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Grok 4.5</p></td><td><p>$2.00</p></td><td><p>$6.00</p></td><td><p>$8.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://docs.x.ai/developers/models">xAI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>MiMo-V2.5 Pro (&gt;256K)</p></td><td><p>$2.00</p></td><td><p>$6.00</p></td><td><p>$8.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.xiaomimimo.com/docs/en-US/pricing">Xiaomi</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>Gemini 3.6 Flash</b></p></td><td><p><b>$1.50</b></p></td><td><p><b>$7.50</b></p></td><td><p><b>$9.00</b></p></td><td><p><b></b><a href="https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing"><b>Google</b></a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Qwen3.7-Max</p></td><td><p>$2.50</p></td><td><p>$7.50</p></td><td><p>$10.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://modelstudio.console.alibabacloud.com/ap-southeast-1?tab=doc#/doc/?type=model&amp;url=2840914_2&amp;modelId=qwen3.7-max&amp;serviceSite=international">Alibaba Cloud</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Gemini 3.5 Flash</p></td><td><p>$1.50</p></td><td><p>$9.00</p></td><td><p>$10.50</p></td><td><p><a href="https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing">Google</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (≤200K)</p></td><td><p>$2.00</p></td><td><p>$12.00</p></td><td><p>$14.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing">Google</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GPT-5.6 Terra</p></td><td><p>$2.50</p></td><td><p>$15.00</p></td><td><p>$17.50</p></td><td><p><a href="https://openai.com/index/previewing-gpt-5-6-sol/">OpenAI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GPT-5.4</p></td><td><p>$2.50</p></td><td><p>$15.00</p></td><td><p>$17.50</p></td><td><p><a href="https://openai.com/api/pricing/">OpenAI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Kimi K3</p></td><td><p>$3.00</p></td><td><p>$15.00</p></td><td><p>$18.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.kimi.ai/docs/pricing/chat-k3">Moonshot AI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (&gt;200K)</p></td><td><p>$4.00</p></td><td><p>$18.00</p></td><td><p>$22.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing">Google</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Claude Opus 4.8</p></td><td><p>$5.00</p></td><td><p>$25.00</p></td><td><p>$30.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing">Anthropic</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GPT-5.5</p></td><td><p>$5.00</p></td><td><p>$30.00</p></td><td><p>$35.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://openai.com/api/pricing/">OpenAI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GPT-5.5 Instant (chat-latest)</p></td><td><p>$5.00</p></td><td><p>$30.00</p></td><td><p>$35.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/models/chat-latest">OpenAI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sakana Fugu Ultra (≤272K)</p></td><td><p>$5.00</p></td><td><p>$30.00</p></td><td><p>$35.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://console.sakana.ai/pricing#subscription-plan">Sakana AI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GPT-5.6 Sol</p></td><td><p>$5.00</p></td><td><p>$30.00</p></td><td><p>$35.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://openai.com/index/previewing-gpt-5-6-sol/">OpenAI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Claude Fable 5 / Claude Mythos 5</p></td><td><p>$10.00</p></td><td><p>$50.00</p></td><td><p>$60.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/models/overview">Anthropic</a></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>No price was provided yet for the specialty Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber model, which, as its name would imply, is designed for cybersecurity researchers and red teamers to patch bugs. </p><p>While the prices are among the middle-low end of all major AI models globally, the fact that Google designed them to use less tokens overall also should drive down costs for enterprises beyond what the sticker price shows (since you'll be paying for fewer total tokens at any rate). </p><p>Gemini 3.6 Flash and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite are available immediately through the Gemini API in Google AI Studio and Android Studio, as well as within the consumer Gemini application and Google Search. According to a <a href="https://deepmind.google/blog/introducing-gemini-3-5-flash-cyber/">separate Google blog post</a>, Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber will be available "exclusively available to governments and trusted partners via CodeMender soon" — <a href="https://deepmind.google/blog/introducing-codemender-an-ai-agent-for-code-security/">CodeMender</a> being Google's proprietary AI code bug-fixing agent released last year. </p><p>As with previous Gemini models, these are all proprietary and "closed source," thus, they can only be obtained through Google's official API and that of its partners, as opposed to an open-source license like MIT or Apache 2.0. </p><p>One conspicuous omission noted by developers on X and social media: where is the larger, more powerful, flagship Gemini 3.5 Pro model Google previously alluded would be released this summer? After all, Gemini 3.1 Pro, the prior flagship, <a href="https://venturebeat.com/technology/google-launches-gemini-3-1-pro-retaking-ai-crown-with-2x-reasoning">debuted back in February 2026</a>, and rivals OpenAI and Anthropic have since released several more generations of flagship updates far more powerful than Google's. </p><p>Google technical staffer Logan Kilpatrick <a href="https://x.com/OfficialLoganK/status/2079592006163349538">responded to one such inquiry on X, writing</a>: "Gemini 3.5 Pro is currently testing with partners and we plan to make it broadly available as soon as it’s ready." </p><p>Google's release signals that the immediate future of AI lies in agentic capabilities—systems that operate autonomously over extended periods. </p><p>If early large language models are akin to massive, fuel-hungry freight trains capable of hauling incredible loads at immense cost, the new Flash series represents a fleet of nimble, hyper-efficient hybrid delivery vans.</p><h2><b>Efficiency gains ranging from 17% to 65% reduced tokens for strong results on third-party benchmarks</b></h2><p>Under the hood, Gemini 3.6 Flash achieves significant efficiency gains. The model reduces output token usage by 17% compared to its predecessor, Gemini 3.5 Flash, according to the <a href="https://x.com/ArtificialAnlys/status/2079596244339707956">Artificial Analysis Index</a> maintained by the independent third-party AI benchmarking group of the same name. </p><p>In specific long-horizon software engineering benchmarks like <a href="https://deepswe.datacurve.ai/">DeepSWE</a>, which measures how well agents complete multi-step engineering tasks from scratch, the token savings reach up to 65%. </p><p>This reduction means the model requires fewer reasoning steps and tool calls to complete the exact same multi-step workflow. Think of token efficiency like fuel economy in a vehicle. </p><p>When an AI model takes a convoluted path to solve a problem, it burns through more computational fuel, driving up the final cost for the developer. By streamlining its internal logic, Gemini 3.6 Flash arrives at the correct answer faster and cheaper.</p><p>While Google's materials did not specify the exact architectural or algorithmic changes used to achieve this token efficiency, they noted that the model "takes fewer reasoning steps and tool calls to accomplish multi-step workflows" and exhibits reduced "verbosity."</p><p>The official model cards released by Google reveal that both <a href="https://storage.googleapis.com/deepmind-media/Model-Cards/Gemini-3-6-Flash-Model-Card.pdf">Gemini 3.6 Flash</a> and <a href="https://storage.googleapis.com/deepmind-media/Model-Cards/Gemini-3-5-Flash-Lite-Model-Card.pdf">Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite</a> feature a 1-million-token input context window alongside a max output limit of 64,000 tokens, with both models sharing a knowledge cutoff date of March 2026.</p><h2><b>Respectable benchmark performance at low cost</b></h2><p>The technological improvements extend to concrete capabilities. Gemini 3.6 Flash scores 49% on the DeepSWE benchmark, a notable increase from the 37% achieved by version 3.5. </p><p>It also pushes machine learning engineering performance higher, scoring 63.9% on MLE-Bench compared to 49.7% previously. Furthermore, Google integrates computer use as a built-in client-side tool via the Gemini API and Gemini Enterprise, reflecting an OSWorld-Verified score of 83.0%, up from 78.4%. </p><p>The model also tackles knowledge work with greater proficiency, outperforming its predecessor on benchmarks like GDPval-AA v2 by moving from a score of 1349 to 1421.</p><p>To ensure safety amidst these capability upgrades, Google deploys enhanced Frontier Safety safeguards. These protections harden the model against jailbreaks and mitigate risks in Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear domains, as well as cyber offense misuses. </p><p>The engineering team trains the model to minimize refusals for beneficial uses, striking a necessary balance between strict security and practical utility.</p><h2>M<b>odels for low-cost coding, agentic, and cybersecurity use cases — respectively</b></h2><p>Google divided its new offerings into three distinct products tailored for different operational needs. </p><p>Gemini 3.6 Flash serves as the heavy-duty workhorse of the trio. It handles complex coding, intricate knowledge work, and multimodal processing with improved precision. Enterprise customers utilize it for demanding tasks such as complex document parsing, intricate chart and data analysis, and long-form report drafting. </p><p>The model executes complex code migrations using multi-agent orchestration frameworks with lower latency and higher quality than earlier iterations. Furthermore, 3.6 Flash aids in developing photographic texture extractors for 3D workflows using canvas interfaces.</p><p>Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite targets environments where high throughput and absolute minimal latency are non-negotiable. Google designates it as the fastest model in the 3.5 series. </p><p>As measured by Artificial Analysis, the model processes 350 output tokens per second, making it highly effective for agentic search and massive document processing workloads. <a href="https://artificialanalysis.ai/articles/gemini-3-6-flash-3-5-flash-lite-halving-time">Artificial Analysis notes</a> this is about twice as fast as prior generation model Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite.</p><p>Developers can configure 3.5 Flash-Lite to prioritize low-latency execution for high-volume tasks using minimal thinking levels, or engage higher thinking levels to process complex multi-step subagent workloads. </p><p>Despite its lite designation, it outperforms the standard Gemini 3 Flash on several key agentic and coding evaluations, including SWE-Bench Pro, where it scores 54.2% compared to 49.6%, and OSWorld-Verified, scoring 74.0% versus 65.1%. </p><p>The model extracts product features from massive datasets, generates interactive web design concepts, and scales receipt translation seamlessly.</p><p>The third product, Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber, represents a highly specialized deployment. Google fine-tuned this model specifically to find and fix cybersecurity vulnerabilities. It integrates directly with Google's CodeMender agent. </p><p>In practice, multiple 3.5 Flash Cyber agents work concurrently to produce a single, comprehensive vulnerability report, achieving competitive performance at the frontier on the CyberGym benchmark, even getting within range of Anthropic's much-hyped Mythos model.</p><p>Google did not specify an exact numerical cost for 3.5 Flash Cyber, stating only that it is fine-tuned "at a lower price per token than larger models.</p><h2><b>Commercial licensing only</b></h2><p>The licensing framework for the new Gemini models carries profound implications for developers and enterprise users. Google deploys Gemini 3.6 Flash and 3.5 Flash-Lite under a commercial, proprietary API model. Unlike open-source software governed by licenses such as the MIT License or the GNU General Public License, developers do not gain access to the underlying model weights, training data, or source code.</p><p>An MIT or GPL license grants users the freedom to download the codebase, modify the internal architecture, self-host the deployment, and distribute the software infrastructure independently. In contrast, Google's API approach means developers essentially rent access to the intelligence on a strict metered basis. Every prompt and generated response travels through Google's managed servers, incurring a cost based on the strict pricing structure of $1.50 per million input tokens for 3.6 Flash. </p><p>This commercial tethering restricts deployment flexibility. Enterprises cannot air-gap the models entirely on their own local secure hardware without establishing specialized, high-tier enterprise agreements with Google Cloud. Developers remain bound by Google's acceptable use policies, arbitrary rate limits, and network requirements, creating a permanent dependency on Google's infrastructure uptime and terms of service.</p><p>The licensing for Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber proves even more restrictive. Acknowledging the dual-use nature of cybersecurity AI—which attackers can weaponize just as easily as defenders can use it to patch systems—Google is for now making the model only available behind a limited-access pilot program, similar to the trend kicked off by Anthropic's Mythos model with its <a href="https://venturebeat.com/technology/anthropic-says-its-most-powerful-ai-cyber-model-is-too-dangerous-to-release">Project Glasswing program</a>, and continued by <a href="https://venturebeat.com/technology/openai-unveils-gpt-5-6-sol-terra-and-luna-models-but-only-accessible-to-limited-preview-partners-for-now-per-us-gov">OpenAI with its staggered rollout for GPT-5.6</a>. </p><p>In this case, Google is making 3.5 Flash Cyber exclusively available to governments and trusted partners. This strict gatekeeping prevents open access, prioritizing systemic security over widespread developer innovation.</p><h2><b>Looking ahead</b></h2><p>Google DeepMind continues to iterate rapidly, but the gap in its product line remains apparent. While the Flash series excels in speed and economy, the industry eagerly awaits the deployment of Gemini 3.5 Pro to gauge Google's absolute frontier capabilities.</p><p>Simultaneously, the company confirms that pre-training for Gemini 4 has already commenced. </p><p>Until the next major flagship release materializes, developers must optimize their systems using the highly efficient, yet purposefully constrained, Flash architecture.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AI and the rise of the universal entertainment app]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Over the past decade, streaming platforms competed by dominating individual formats like music, video, podcasts, or audiobooks. Now, as AI makes it easier to create, organize, and recommend content, those distinctions are fading, pushing companies like Spotify, Netflix, YouTube, and TikTok to bec...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684793/it-nachrichten/ai-and-the-rise-of-the-universal-entertainment-app/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684793/it-nachrichten/ai-and-the-rise-of-the-universal-entertainment-app/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 22:56:49 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Over the past decade, streaming platforms competed by dominating individual formats like music, video, podcasts, or audiobooks. Now, as AI makes it easier to create, organize, and recommend content, those distinctions are fading, pushing companies like Spotify, Netflix, YouTube, and TikTok to become all-purpose entertainment destinations instead.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google's Gemini Flash 5.6 model cuts AI agent token costs by up to 65% on long horizon engineering tasks —and 3.5 Pro is on the way]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Google DeepMind today released three new proprietary AI models it says are among its most token-efficient yet: Gemini 3.6 Flash, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite, and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber. The models aim to make AI agents faster, smarter, and cheaper at scale. Google is pricing Gemini 3.6 Flash at $1.50 p...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684788/it-nachrichten/googles-gemini-flash-56-model-cuts-ai-agent-token-costs-by-up-to-65-on-long-horizon-engineering-tasks-and-35-pro-is-on-the-way/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684788/it-nachrichten/googles-gemini-flash-56-model-cuts-ai-agent-token-costs-by-up-to-65-on-long-horizon-engineering-tasks-and-35-pro-is-on-the-way/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 22:56:46 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google DeepMind<a href="https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/models-and-research/gemini-models/gemini-3-6-flash-3-5-flash-lite-3-5-flash-cyber/?utm_source=x&amp;utm_medium=social&amp;utm_campaign=&amp;utm_content="> today released three new proprietary AI models</a> it says are among its most token-efficient yet: Gemini 3.6 Flash, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite, and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber. </p><p>The models aim to make AI agents faster, smarter, and cheaper at scale. Google is pricing Gemini 3.6 Flash at $1.50 per one million input tokens and $7.50 per one million output tokens through its application programming interface (API), while Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite costs a staggeringly cheap $0.30/$2.50 per million tokens in/out. </p><p>Compare that to the $1.50/$9.00 per 1M tokens for Gemini 3.5 Flash, and the $2/$12 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, and the savings are considerable. However, Google's prior generation Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite still remains the search giant's "most cost-efficient" model at $0.25/$1.50 per 1M tokens. Yet, it remains 2X slower than the new, more expensive Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite, giving those enterprises who value speed more "bang" for their buck. </p><h2><b>VB Frontier AI Model API Pricing Comparison Chart (Late July 2026 Shortlist)</b></h2><table><tbody><tr><td><p><b>Model</b></p></td><td><p><b>Input ($/1M)</b></p></td><td><p><b>Output ($/1M)</b></p></td><td><p><b>Total ($/1M)</b></p></td><td><p><b>Source</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>MiMo-V2.5 Flash</p></td><td><p>$0.10</p></td><td><p>$0.30</p></td><td><p>$0.40</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.xiaomimimo.com/docs/en-US/pricing">Xiaomi</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>deepseek-v4-flash</p></td><td><p>$0.14</p></td><td><p>$0.28</p></td><td><p>$0.42</p></td><td><p><a href="https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing">DeepSeek</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>deepseek-v4-pro</p></td><td><p>$0.435</p></td><td><p>$0.87</p></td><td><p>$1.305</p></td><td><p><a href="https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing">DeepSeek</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>MiniMax-M3</p></td><td><p>$0.30</p></td><td><p>$1.20</p></td><td><p>$1.50</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.minimax.io/subscribe/token-plan?tab=api-enterprise">MiniMax</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>LongCat-2.0 — limited-time promo</p></td><td><p>$0.30</p></td><td><p>$1.20</p></td><td><p>$1.50</p></td><td><p><a href="https://longcat.chat/platform/docs/APIPayAsYouGo.html">LongCat</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite</p></td><td><p>$0.25</p></td><td><p>$1.50</p></td><td><p>$1.75</p></td><td><p><a href="https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing">Google</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Qwen3.7-Plus</p></td><td><p>$0.40</p></td><td><p>$1.60</p></td><td><p>$2.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://modelstudio.console.alibabacloud.com/ap-southeast-1?tab=doc#/doc/?type=model&amp;url=2840914_2&amp;modelId=qwen3.7-plus&amp;serviceSite=international">Alibaba Cloud</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>MiMo-V2.5</p></td><td><p>$0.40</p></td><td><p>$2.00</p></td><td><p>$2.40</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.xiaomimimo.com/docs/en-US/pricing">Xiaomi</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite</b></p></td><td><p><b>$0.30</b></p></td><td><p><b>$2.50</b></p></td><td><p><b>$2.80</b></p></td><td><p><b></b><a href="https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing"><b>Google</b></a><b></b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>LongCat-2.0 — standard</p></td><td><p>$0.75</p></td><td><p>$2.95</p></td><td><p>$3.70</p></td><td><p><a href="https://longcat.chat/platform/docs/APIPayAsYouGo.html">LongCat</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>MiMo-V2.5 Pro (≤256K)</p></td><td><p>$1.00</p></td><td><p>$3.00</p></td><td><p>$4.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.xiaomimimo.com/docs/en-US/pricing">Xiaomi</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GLM-5.2</p></td><td><p>$1.40</p></td><td><p>$4.40</p></td><td><p>$5.80</p></td><td><p><a href="https://docs.z.ai/guides/overview/pricing">Z.ai</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GPT-5.6 Luna</p></td><td><p>$1.00</p></td><td><p>$6.00</p></td><td><p>$7.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://openai.com/index/previewing-gpt-5-6-sol/">OpenAI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Grok 4.5</p></td><td><p>$2.00</p></td><td><p>$6.00</p></td><td><p>$8.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://docs.x.ai/developers/models">xAI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>MiMo-V2.5 Pro (&gt;256K)</p></td><td><p>$2.00</p></td><td><p>$6.00</p></td><td><p>$8.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.xiaomimimo.com/docs/en-US/pricing">Xiaomi</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>Gemini 3.6 Flash</b></p></td><td><p><b>$1.50</b></p></td><td><p><b>$7.50</b></p></td><td><p><b>$9.00</b></p></td><td><p><b></b><a href="https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing"><b>Google</b></a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Qwen3.7-Max</p></td><td><p>$2.50</p></td><td><p>$7.50</p></td><td><p>$10.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://modelstudio.console.alibabacloud.com/ap-southeast-1?tab=doc#/doc/?type=model&amp;url=2840914_2&amp;modelId=qwen3.7-max&amp;serviceSite=international">Alibaba Cloud</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Gemini 3.5 Flash</p></td><td><p>$1.50</p></td><td><p>$9.00</p></td><td><p>$10.50</p></td><td><p><a href="https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing">Google</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (≤200K)</p></td><td><p>$2.00</p></td><td><p>$12.00</p></td><td><p>$14.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing">Google</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GPT-5.6 Terra</p></td><td><p>$2.50</p></td><td><p>$15.00</p></td><td><p>$17.50</p></td><td><p><a href="https://openai.com/index/previewing-gpt-5-6-sol/">OpenAI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GPT-5.4</p></td><td><p>$2.50</p></td><td><p>$15.00</p></td><td><p>$17.50</p></td><td><p><a href="https://openai.com/api/pricing/">OpenAI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Kimi K3</p></td><td><p>$3.00</p></td><td><p>$15.00</p></td><td><p>$18.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.kimi.ai/docs/pricing/chat-k3">Moonshot AI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (&gt;200K)</p></td><td><p>$4.00</p></td><td><p>$18.00</p></td><td><p>$22.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing">Google</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Claude Opus 4.8</p></td><td><p>$5.00</p></td><td><p>$25.00</p></td><td><p>$30.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing">Anthropic</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GPT-5.5</p></td><td><p>$5.00</p></td><td><p>$30.00</p></td><td><p>$35.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://openai.com/api/pricing/">OpenAI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GPT-5.5 Instant (chat-latest)</p></td><td><p>$5.00</p></td><td><p>$30.00</p></td><td><p>$35.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/models/chat-latest">OpenAI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sakana Fugu Ultra (≤272K)</p></td><td><p>$5.00</p></td><td><p>$30.00</p></td><td><p>$35.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://console.sakana.ai/pricing#subscription-plan">Sakana AI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GPT-5.6 Sol</p></td><td><p>$5.00</p></td><td><p>$30.00</p></td><td><p>$35.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://openai.com/index/previewing-gpt-5-6-sol/">OpenAI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Claude Fable 5 / Claude Mythos 5</p></td><td><p>$10.00</p></td><td><p>$50.00</p></td><td><p>$60.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/models/overview">Anthropic</a></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>No price was provided yet for the specialty Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber model, which, as its name would imply, is designed for cybersecurity researchers and red teamers to patch bugs. </p><p>While the prices are among the middle-low end of all major AI models globally, the fact that Google designed them to use less tokens overall also should drive down costs for enterprises beyond what the sticker price shows (since you'll be paying for fewer total tokens at any rate). </p><p>Gemini 3.6 Flash and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite are available immediately through the Gemini API in Google AI Studio and Android Studio, as well as within the consumer Gemini application and Google Search. According to a <a href="https://deepmind.google/blog/introducing-gemini-3-5-flash-cyber/">separate Google blog post</a>, Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber will be available "exclusively available to governments and trusted partners via CodeMender soon" — <a href="https://deepmind.google/blog/introducing-codemender-an-ai-agent-for-code-security/">CodeMender</a> being Google's proprietary AI code bug-fixing agent released last year. </p><p>As with previous Gemini models, these are all proprietary and "closed source," thus, they can only be obtained through Google's official API and that of its partners, as opposed to an open-source license like MIT or Apache 2.0. </p><p>One conspicuous omission noted by developers on X and social media: where is the larger, more powerful, flagship Gemini 3.5 Pro model Google previously alluded would be released this summer? After all, Gemini 3.1 Pro, the prior flagship, <a href="https://venturebeat.com/technology/google-launches-gemini-3-1-pro-retaking-ai-crown-with-2x-reasoning">debuted back in February 2026</a>, and rivals OpenAI and Anthropic have since released several more generations of flagship updates far more powerful than Google's. </p><p>Google technical staffer Logan Kilpatrick <a href="https://x.com/OfficialLoganK/status/2079592006163349538">responded to one such inquiry on X, writing</a>: "Gemini 3.5 Pro is currently testing with partners and we plan to make it broadly available as soon as it’s ready." </p><p>Google's release signals that the immediate future of AI lies in agentic capabilities—systems that operate autonomously over extended periods. </p><p>If early large language models are akin to massive, fuel-hungry freight trains capable of hauling incredible loads at immense cost, the new Flash series represents a fleet of nimble, hyper-efficient hybrid delivery vans.</p><h2><b>Efficiency gains ranging from 17% to 65% reduced tokens for strong results on third-party benchmarks</b></h2><p>Under the hood, Gemini 3.6 Flash achieves significant efficiency gains. The model reduces output token usage by 17% compared to its predecessor, Gemini 3.5 Flash, according to the <a href="https://x.com/ArtificialAnlys/status/2079596244339707956">Artificial Analysis Index</a> maintained by the independent third-party AI benchmarking group of the same name. </p><p>In specific long-horizon software engineering benchmarks like <a href="https://deepswe.datacurve.ai/">DeepSWE</a>, which measures how well agents complete multi-step engineering tasks from scratch, the token savings reach up to 65%. </p><p>This reduction means the model requires fewer reasoning steps and tool calls to complete the exact same multi-step workflow. Think of token efficiency like fuel economy in a vehicle. </p><p>When an AI model takes a convoluted path to solve a problem, it burns through more computational fuel, driving up the final cost for the developer. By streamlining its internal logic, Gemini 3.6 Flash arrives at the correct answer faster and cheaper.</p><p>While Google's materials did not specify the exact architectural or algorithmic changes used to achieve this token efficiency, they noted that the model "takes fewer reasoning steps and tool calls to accomplish multi-step workflows" and exhibits reduced "verbosity."</p><p>The official model cards released by Google reveal that both <a href="https://storage.googleapis.com/deepmind-media/Model-Cards/Gemini-3-6-Flash-Model-Card.pdf">Gemini 3.6 Flash</a> and <a href="https://storage.googleapis.com/deepmind-media/Model-Cards/Gemini-3-5-Flash-Lite-Model-Card.pdf">Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite</a> feature a 1-million-token input context window alongside a max output limit of 64,000 tokens, with both models sharing a knowledge cutoff date of March 2026.</p><h2><b>Respectable benchmark performance at low cost</b></h2><p>The technological improvements extend to concrete capabilities. Gemini 3.6 Flash scores 49% on the DeepSWE benchmark, a notable increase from the 37% achieved by version 3.5. </p><p>It also pushes machine learning engineering performance higher, scoring 63.9% on MLE-Bench compared to 49.7% previously. Furthermore, Google integrates computer use as a built-in client-side tool via the Gemini API and Gemini Enterprise, reflecting an OSWorld-Verified score of 83.0%, up from 78.4%. </p><p>The model also tackles knowledge work with greater proficiency, outperforming its predecessor on benchmarks like GDPval-AA v2 by moving from a score of 1349 to 1421.</p><p>To ensure safety amidst these capability upgrades, Google deploys enhanced Frontier Safety safeguards. These protections harden the model against jailbreaks and mitigate risks in Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear domains, as well as cyber offense misuses. </p><p>The engineering team trains the model to minimize refusals for beneficial uses, striking a necessary balance between strict security and practical utility.</p><h2>M<b>odels for low-cost coding, agentic, and cybersecurity use cases — respectively</b></h2><p>Google divided its new offerings into three distinct products tailored for different operational needs. </p><p>Gemini 3.6 Flash serves as the heavy-duty workhorse of the trio. It handles complex coding, intricate knowledge work, and multimodal processing with improved precision. Enterprise customers utilize it for demanding tasks such as complex document parsing, intricate chart and data analysis, and long-form report drafting. The model executes complex code migrations using multi-agent orchestration frameworks with lower latency and higher quality than earlier iterations. Furthermore, 3.6 Flash aids in developing photographic texture extractors for 3D workflows using canvas interfaces.</p><p>Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite targets environments where high throughput and absolute minimal latency are non-negotiable. Google designates it as the fastest model in the 3.5 series. </p><p>As measured by Artificial Analysis, the model processes 350 output tokens per second, making it highly effective for agentic search and massive document processing workloads. <a href="https://artificialanalysis.ai/articles/gemini-3-6-flash-3-5-flash-lite-halving-time">Artificial Analysis notes</a> this is about twice as fast as prior generation model Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite.</p><p>Developers can configure 3.5 Flash-Lite to prioritize low-latency execution for high-volume tasks using minimal thinking levels, or engage higher thinking levels to process complex multi-step subagent workloads. </p><p>Despite its lite designation, it outperforms the standard Gemini 3 Flash on several key agentic and coding evaluations, including SWE-Bench Pro, where it scores 54.2% compared to 49.6%, and OSWorld-Verified, scoring 74.0% versus 65.1%. </p><p>The model extracts product features from massive datasets, generates interactive web design concepts, and scales receipt translation seamlessly.</p><p>The third product, Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber, represents a highly specialized deployment. Google fine-tuned this model specifically to find and fix cybersecurity vulnerabilities. It integrates directly with Google's CodeMender agent. </p><p>In practice, multiple 3.5 Flash Cyber agents work concurrently to produce a single, comprehensive vulnerability report, achieving competitive performance at the frontier on the CyberGym benchmark. </p><p>Google did not specify an exact numerical cost for 3.5 Flash Cyber, stating only that it is fine-tuned "at a lower price per token than larger models.</p><h2><b>Commercial licensing only</b></h2><p>The licensing framework for the new Gemini models carries profound implications for developers and enterprise users. Google deploys Gemini 3.6 Flash and 3.5 Flash-Lite under a commercial, proprietary API model. Unlike open-source software governed by licenses such as the MIT License or the GNU General Public License, developers do not gain access to the underlying model weights, training data, or source code.</p><p>An MIT or GPL license grants users the freedom to download the codebase, modify the internal architecture, self-host the deployment, and distribute the software infrastructure independently. In contrast, Google's API approach means developers essentially rent access to the intelligence on a strict metered basis. Every prompt and generated response travels through Google's managed servers, incurring a cost based on the strict pricing structure of $1.50 per million input tokens for 3.6 Flash. </p><p>This commercial tethering restricts deployment flexibility. Enterprises cannot air-gap the models entirely on their own local secure hardware without establishing specialized, high-tier enterprise agreements with Google Cloud. Developers remain bound by Google's acceptable use policies, arbitrary rate limits, and network requirements, creating a permanent dependency on Google's infrastructure uptime and terms of service.</p><p>The licensing for Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber proves even more restrictive. Acknowledging the dual-use nature of cybersecurity AI—which attackers can weaponize just as easily as defenders can use it to patch systems—Google is for now making the model only available behind a limited-access pilot program, similar to the trend kicked off by Anthropic's Mythos model with its Project Glasswing program, and continued by OpenAI with its staggered rollout for GPT-5.6. </p><p>In this case, Google is making 3.5 Flash Cyber exclusively available to governments and trusted partners. This strict gatekeeping prevents open access, prioritizing systemic security over widespread developer innovation.</p><h2><b>Looking ahead</b></h2><p>Google DeepMind continues to iterate rapidly, but the gap in its product line remains apparent. While the Flash series excels in speed and economy, </p><p>the industry eagerly awaits the deployment of Gemini 3.5 Pro to gauge Google's absolute frontier capabilities.</p><p>Simultaneously, the company confirms that pre-training for Gemini 4 has already commenced. </p><p>Until the next major flagship release materializes, developers must optimize their systems using the highly efficient, yet purposefully constrained, Flash architecture.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Evals are the new PRD, Expedia’s AI chief tells VB Transform 2026]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[“The new PRD are the evals,” Xavi Amatriain, Expedia Group’s first chief AI and data officer, told the VB Transform 2026 audience last week in Menlo Park. “So basically, you encode what you want the product to do through your evals, which might include red teaming evals and all kinds of other thi...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684604/it-nachrichten/evals-are-the-new-prd-expedias-ai-chief-tells-vb-transform-2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684604/it-nachrichten/evals-are-the-new-prd-expedias-ai-chief-tells-vb-transform-2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 20:19:07 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“The new PRD are the evals,” Xavi Amatriain, <a href="https://www.expediagroup.com/en-us">Expedia Group’s</a> first chief AI and data officer, told the <a href="https://venturebeat.com/vbtransform2026">VB Transform 2026</a> audience last week in Menlo Park. “So basically, you encode what you want the product to do through your evals, which might include red teaming evals and all kinds of other things, which already have a bunch of security requirements. So, you already embed that into the PRD and the product design document before you even start coding.”</p><p>He pushed it further. “With AI-assisted or AI-generated code, that’s gonna be the future. It’s like all your thinking is gonna go into the evals.”</p><p>Amatriain served as VP of AI and Compute Enablement at Google across the platforms powering Gemini and Google Search before his December 2025 appointment at Expedia. He's mentored talent who went on to found Perplexity and Scale AI. </p><p>VentureBeat’s <a href="https://venturebeat.com/orchestration/enterprise-ai-is-entering-an-evaluation-gap-agents-are-gaining-autonomy-faster-than-companies-can-verify-them">VB Pulse research on the evaluation gap</a> reinforced the stakes. Sixty-six percent of the 157 enterprises surveyed already permit some production deployment without human review or are building toward it within the next 12 months, yet only 5% fully trust the automated evaluations that would make that decision. Half have shipped an agent that passed internal evals but then failed with a real customer.</p><h2><b>Don’t let guardrails get in the way of feedback</b></h2><p>“The more guardrails and artificial business rules and sort of rules that you put into the system, the worse off,” Amatriain said. “Not only because they’re brittle, but also because they actually mess up with the feedback loop. You are actually biasing the user and the feedback you get from the user, and then you’re learning that in the wrong way.” He called guardrails “a necessary evil” and said the goal is to minimize their impact over time.</p><p>Not everyone at Transform agreed. Other speakers argued during the event that the highest-risk actions still demand very firm guardrails.</p><p>Expedia governs AI through three layers instead. Principles come first, communicated broadly. “I like to encode at a very high level how I expect decisions to be made, because in a large organization you’re gonna have a lot of distributed decision making,” Amatriain said. “And sometimes, if you’re lucky enough, those principles might be embedded in your culture. But most of the time, my experience has been they’re not.” The processes and tools that enforce them follow. “Principles look really nice on a picture on some wall, but you need to then give them teeth,” he said. Automation sits on top of both.</p><p>In practice, this plays out through what Expedia calls agent release toll gates, checkpoints calibrated to risk. “Governance needs to correlate to the risk,” Amatriain said. “And if you have something that is low risk, you don’t need too much governance to get in the way. But if there’s a lot of risk, then you need more governance. That can be encoded.” The toll gates tie evaluation rounds, red teaming, and security review to each agent’s risk level, and <a href="https://venturebeat.com/orchestration/what-billions-of-ai-predictions-taught-expedia-before-the-age-of-ai-agents">the checks shift from recommended to required as the stakes climb</a>. </p><h2>Specialized agents over monolithic intelligence</h2><p>“Even when I was at Google, I was like, I don’t believe in AGI as sort of like a singleton and a unified sort of like single model,” Amatriain told the audience. “I think it’s much better to think of it as composition, sort of like having specialized agents that are very good at some task and then composing the system out of those specialized agents.”</p><p>Expedia’s architecture starts at the component level. Tools compose into skills, skills assemble into sub-agents, and sub-agents get orchestrated into the full agentic system. “You need to have those principles that are unified that talk about things like what is the tone that we’re using, how are we addressing the user, how are we passing context, memory,” he said. “All of that needs to be thoroughly designed.” He framed this as a systemic design problem. “It’s not about the model, it’s not about a specific solution, it’s about how you’re designing the system.”</p><p>Amatriain argued that scoping each agent narrowly also makes the system easier to secure, since teams can evaluate and lock down individual agents in isolation before composing them.</p><h2>When the user must keep the final click</h2><p>Travel pricing changes in real time, flight availability shifts minute to minute, and hotel reviews routinely contradict what suppliers claim. Amatriain described a system that blends retrieval-augmented generation with direct API tool calls, choosing the approach based on latency. “If the user asks you a question like, how much does a four star hotel usually cost in Chicago in July, you don’t expect the agent to take two minutes to answer that question,” he said. “You expect an immediate answer because that answer can be cached and it doesn’t need real-time information.” A pet-friendly four-star near Lake Michigan with a pool might justify a 30-second reasoning window.</p><p>“The supplier might be saying, yeah, we have a great swimming pool, but then we also have the reviews from the travelers and we actually see there’s two reviews that say the swimming pool was not great or was not open after 6 p.m.,” Amatriain explained. A generic chatbot, he added, would only surface what a supplier self-reports, while Expedia cross-references against its own review corpus.</p><p>“We don’t want the agent to book the hotel or to buy you a plane ticket for you,” Amatriain said. “That’s something that the user has to have the agency. And the agent can recommend, can suggest, can discuss with you, but you’re gonna have to hit that click. And that’s non-negotiable.” That constraint, he argued, is also a security decision. “Once you establish those design principles, you also don’t need the guardrail because otherwise you’re gonna have to put all those guardrails in after the fact.”</p><h2>The next attackers will be other AI systems</h2><p>“Security needs to be a principle that is shifted as left as possible and as part of the design itself,” Amatriain said in response to an audience question. “And usually when you need a guardrail is because you’ve not thought about it early on.”</p><p>A second audience member pressed for lessons learned from production. Amatriain described a feedback loop where monitoring signals flow back into the eval suite. “You can almost automate the whole cycle,” he said. “But having that whole feedback loop from real signals, from your operating AI system, all the way into being reported and fixed as quickly as possible is going to become essential.”</p><p>Amatriain's toll gates are a bet that governance calibrated to risk can stay ahead of that feedback loop. VentureBeat’s separate June <a href="https://venturebeat.com/security/shared-api-keys-expose-ai-agent-fleets-venturebeat-research">Pulse survey on agent security</a>, drawn from 107 enterprises, shows how thin that margin is. More than half, 54 percent, have already had an agent security incident or near-miss. Fifty-nine percent plan to adopt, add, or replace agent security tooling within 12 months, and 29% plan to move this quarter. Incident rates climb with organization size, reaching 63% among enterprises with more than 1,000 employees versus 49% for companies with 101 to 1,000. And sandbox isolation, the one post-breach control that limits damage, drops from 35% adoption at the smaller companies to just 20 percent at the largest.</p><p>Amatriain warned that threats will increasingly come from other AI systems. “You’re gonna get threats coming not only from humans but also from other external agentic systems that are really powerful, and they’re gonna be poking at everything you’re doing. And as soon as you detect something, it’s not only about the detection, but the time to fix becomes essential here.”</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Weltpremiere im OP: Humanoide Roboter führen erstmals Operationen durch]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag Weltpremiere im OP: Humanoide Roboter führen erstmals Operationen durch erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Zwei humanoide Roboter haben erstmals allein Operationen durchgeführt, fer...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684475/it-nachrichten/weltpremiere-im-op-humanoide-roboter-fuehren-erstmals-operationen-durch/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684475/it-nachrichten/weltpremiere-im-op-humanoide-roboter-fuehren-erstmals-operationen-durch/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 19:34:39 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/21/operation-humanoide-roboter/">Weltpremiere im OP: Humanoide Roboter führen erstmals Operationen durch</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Zwei humanoide Roboter haben erstmals allein Operationen durchgeführt, ferngesteuert von Chirurgen. Für eine präklinischen Studie entfernten sie Säugetieren die Gallenblase. Für eine aktuelle Studie kamen zum ersten Mal ferngesteuerte humanoide Roboter im Operationssaal zum Einsatz. Ein Forscherteam, bestehend aus Ingenieuren und Chirurgen der University of California San Diego, absolvierte dafür zwei verschiedene Eingriffe. Humanoider OP-Roboter […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/21/operation-humanoide-roboter/">Weltpremiere im OP: Humanoide Roboter führen erstmals Operationen durch</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Nearly every Kindle is steeply discounted at Best Buy]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[If you’ve been thinking about picking up a Kindle before school starts, or for your next vacation, now’s a good time to do it. As part of its Black Friday in July sale, Best Buy has brought the Kindle Paperwhite back down to its all-time low of $124.99 ($35 off). It’s the Kindle we recommend […]]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684470/it-nachrichten/nearly-every-kindle-is-steeply-discounted-at-best-buy/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684470/it-nachrichten/nearly-every-kindle-is-steeply-discounted-at-best-buy/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 19:34:30 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If you’ve been thinking about picking up a Kindle before school starts, or for your next vacation, now’s a good time to do it. As part of its Black Friday in July sale, Best Buy has brought the Kindle Paperwhite back down to its all-time low of $124.99 ($35 off). It’s the Kindle we recommend […]]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Exploring self-distilled reasoning for supervised fine-tuning with Amazon Nova]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[In this post, we explore an idea for generating thinking tokens for datasets that lack reasoning traces in SFT customization. We first examine the reasoning suppression problem, then introduce Self-Distilled Reasoning (SDR), validate it across three benchmarks, and provide practical recommendations.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684375/ai-nachrichten/exploring-self-distilled-reasoning-for-supervised-fine-tuning-with-amazon-nova/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684375/ai-nachrichten/exploring-self-distilled-reasoning-for-supervised-fine-tuning-with-amazon-nova/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 18:35:07 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this post, we explore an idea for generating thinking tokens for datasets that lack reasoning traces in SFT customization. We first examine the reasoning suppression problem, then introduce Self-Distilled Reasoning (SDR), validate it across three benchmarks, and provide practical recommendations.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CVE-2026-14440 | Cloudflare Universal SSL Automatic CAA RRset Management protection mechanism (VA-26-183-01 / VU#840183)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A vulnerability categorized as problematic has been discovered in Cloudflare Universal SSL. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component Automatic CAA RRset Management. Such manipulation leads to protection mechanism failure.

This vulnerability is uniquely identifi...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684255/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-14440-cloudflare-universal-ssl-automatic-caa-rrset-management-protection-mechanism-va-26-183-01-vu840183/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684255/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-14440-cloudflare-universal-ssl-automatic-caa-rrset-management-protection-mechanism-va-26-183-01-vu840183/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 17:59:20 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A vulnerability categorized as <a href="https://vuldb.com/kb/risk">problematic</a> has been discovered in <a href="https://vuldb.com/product/cloudflare:universal_ssl">Cloudflare Universal SSL</a>. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component <em>Automatic CAA RRset Management</em>. Such manipulation leads to protection mechanism failure.

This vulnerability is uniquely identified as <a href="https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-14440">CVE-2026-14440</a>. The attack can be launched remotely. Moreover, an exploit is present.

This product is a managed service, so users are unable to manage vulnerability countermeasures on their own. You are recommended to apply the suggested workaround.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Universal has dropped a terrifying trailer for new movie Other Mommy — and I can't wait for Jessica Chastain's return to horror]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The director of the Zoom horror sensation Host is back, and he's brought Jessica Chastain along with him. Check out Other Mommy's terrifying trailer.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684114/it-nachrichten/universal-has-dropped-a-terrifying-trailer-for-new-movie-other-mommy-and-i-cant-wait-for-jessica-chastains-return-to-horror/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684114/it-nachrichten/universal-has-dropped-a-terrifying-trailer-for-new-movie-other-mommy-and-i-cant-wait-for-jessica-chastains-return-to-horror/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 17:03:32 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The director of the Zoom horror sensation Host is back, and he's brought Jessica Chastain along with him. Check out Other Mommy's terrifying trailer.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The AI allocation trap: Record spend, vanishing returns]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[In a single month, one enterprise reportedly spent half a billion dollars on AI. A consultant told Axios that the client had handed its workforce AI licenses, set no usage limits and let the meter run until finance noticed. The figure is spectacular, and it is the wrong thing to fear. That half-b...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683786/it-nachrichten/the-ai-allocation-trap-record-spend-vanishing-returns/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683786/it-nachrichten/the-ai-allocation-trap-record-spend-vanishing-returns/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 15:18:28 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In a single month, one enterprise reportedly spent half a billion dollars on AI. A consultant <a href="https://www.axios.com/2026/05/28/ai-spending-roi-enterprise-costs">told Axios</a> that the client had handed its workforce AI licenses, set no usage limits and let the meter run until finance noticed. The figure is spectacular, and it is the wrong thing to fear. That half-billion-dollar accident is only the visible part of a quieter, far larger failure. <a href="https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2026-1-15-gartner-says-worldwide-ai-spending-will-total-2-point-5-trillion-dollars-in-2026">Worldwide AI spending is forecast to reach $2.52 trillion in 2026</a>, more than any technology category in a generation, and by the most cited measure, roughly 95 percent of it returns nothing. Boards read that as proof that the technology does not work. The evidence points somewhere less comfortable, and it is not a technology problem at all. Most boards cannot see it because they are reading the wrong number: They track failure when the number that matters is allocation. The discipline that separates the winners is not technical. It is how they allocate capital across time, and how willing they are to stop. The hardest discipline in the AI era is not adopting faster. It is allocating honestly and refusing to judge a three-year bet on a six-month cycle.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The number everyone quotes, and no one acts on</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The headline statistic is now familiar. MIT’s Project NANDA, in its 2025 study <a href="https://fortune.com/2025/08/18/mit-report-95-percent-generative-ai-pilots-at-companies-failing-cfo/">The GenAI Divide</a>, found that about 95 percent of enterprise generative AI pilots produced no measurable impact on the P&amp;L, while roughly 5 percent captured nearly all the value. <a href="https://www.spglobal.com/market-intelligence/en/news-insights/research/2025/10/generative-ai-shows-rapid-growth-but-yields-mixed-results">S&amp;P Global Market Intelligence</a> found that the share of companies abandoning most of their AI initiatives jumped from 17 percent to 42 percent in a single year, with the average organization scrapping 46 percent of its proofs-of-concept before production. <a href="https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2025-06-25-gartner-predicts-over-40-percent-of-agentic-ai-projects-will-be-canceled-by-end-of-2027">Gartner</a> expects more than 40 percent of agentic AI projects to be canceled by the end of 2027, citing escalating costs, unclear business value and inadequate risk controls. And the pattern predates generative AI: <a href="https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA2680-1.html">RAND</a> found that more than 80 percent of AI projects fail, roughly twice the rate of comparable work that does not involve AI.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Read as a technology story, these numbers say AI does not work. Read correctly, they say something more useful. MIT’s own authors located the cause not in model quality but in a <a href="https://virtualizationreview.com/articles/2025/08/19/mit-report-finds-most-ai-business-investments-fail-reveals-genai-divide.aspx">learning and integration gap</a>. The winners were not running better models. They picked one problem, executed and worked well together. Purchased solutions reached production about 67 percent of the time, while internal builds succeeded roughly a third as often. <a href="https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2025-03-31-gartner-forecasts-worldwide-genai-spending-to-reach-644-billion-in-2025">Gartner’s own spending forecast</a> notes the same pivot, with CIOs scaling back ambitious internal builds in favor of commercial solutions that promise more predictable value. None of that is a verdict on the technology. It is a verdict on allocation: What gets funded, for how long and against which yardstick. The popular prescription, heard in every boardroom this year, is to measure harder and prove value sooner. That advice quietly repeats the mistake, because forcing a three-year bet to prove itself sooner is precisely how you kill it. The fix is not more measurement. It is measuring each bet against the right clock and subtracting the ones that miss.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The six-month cycle problem</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Return to that 95 percent, because the way it is measured is the whole argument. Much of the reported failure is judged on a short clock, with a pilot counted as a failure if it has not shown a measurable financial return within roughly six months. The single most quoted number in enterprise AI is therefore a six-month yardstick applied to every initiative, including the bets designed to pay back in three years. The headline failure rate is not only a measure of AI. It is a measure of impatience.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The most expensive mistake in enterprise AI is a timing error. Enterprises have been spending heavily on AI for more than two years, and 2026 is the year boards are demanding returns. The multi-year bets funded during the 2024 and 2025 scale-up are only now far enough along to be judged. When a board reviews an initiative, it applies the yardstick it knows, which is quarterly return. That yardstick is correct for an efficiency project and ruinous for a capability bet. A workflow automation that should pay back in two quarters and a foundational data and agent capability that pays back in three years are not the same instrument, yet they are reviewed in the same meeting against the same metric.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is the heart of the divide. The 5 percent did not simply pick better projects. They judged each project against its own horizon. McKinsey’s enduring <a href="https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/enduring-ideas-the-three-horizons-of-growth">Three Horizons model</a> made this discipline standard in corporate strategy a generation ago: near-term, emerging and long-term bets are funded and measured differently. AI erased that discipline because the hype compressed every timeline into the current quarter. The result is two failure modes that appear opposite yet share a common root. Organizations kill three-year bets at month six because they miss a metric the bet was never designed to hit. And they keep funding six-month theater for years because it is visible, safe and never asked to prove a return. Both are allocation failures. Neither is a technology failure.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Subtraction is a strategy</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There is a second discipline, the 5 percent share, and it is the one boards find hardest. They subtract. Every credible study of the failure rate describes the same chaotic pattern underneath it: Initiatives are <a href="https://www.ciodive.com/news/AI-project-fail-data-SPGlobal/742590/">abandoned late, without criteria</a>, after the money is spent and the credibility is gone. Disciplined organizations do the opposite. They decide the conditions for stopping before they start, and they stop on schedule. Subtraction is not the absence of strategy. It is the strategy. Capital removed from a failing bet is capital available for a surviving one, and the survivors are where the entire return lives.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This reframes the 42 percent abandonment figure. Abandonment is not the problem. Undisciplined abandonment is. An organization that liquidates a position the moment it breaches a pre-agreed kill line is practicing portfolio hygiene. An organization that lets a doomed pilot run until someone loses patience is paying full price for a lesson it could have bought at a discount. The 5 percent who won were not smarter. They were patient in the right places and ruthless in the wrong ones.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The HALT framework: Horizon, Allocation, Liquidation, Tracking</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Treating AI as a portfolio rather than a pile of pilots requires four disciplines, and the organizations that execute well put all four in place before the next funding cycle, not after the next failure. The name is deliberate. The discipline most enterprises lack is the willingness to halt the wrong bets in time to fund the right ones.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Component 1: Horizon. </strong>Classify every AI initiative by its true payoff horizon before it is funded. Horizon 1 covers efficiency plays that should return value within two quarters. Horizon 2 covers capability bets, data foundations, agent platforms and integration work that pays back in roughly 6 to 18 months. Horizon 3 covers transformation bets that take eighteen months to three years or longer. Each horizon carries its own success metric, set at funding time. A Horizon 1 yardstick never judges a Horizon 3 bet. This single rule prevents the most common and most expensive error in the portfolio.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Component 2: Allocation. </strong>Decide the split across horizons deliberately, as a board-level capital decision, not as the accidental sum of whatever pilots happened to win approval. A practical reference point, borrowed from decades of innovation-portfolio practice, is roughly 70% to near-term value, 20% to capability, and 10% to transformation. The exact ratio is yours; the discipline is to choose and defend it. The failure mode is an unmanaged portfolio: 90 percent scattered across disconnected Horizon 1 experiments, with nothing compounding into the Horizon 2 capability that the buy-and-integrate winners actually built.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Component 3: Liquidation. </strong>Attach a kill line to every initiative at the moment it is funded: A named milestone, a date and an owner empowered to stop it. If a bet misses its horizon-appropriate milestone, it is liquidated, and capital is reallocated on schedule without debate over sunk costs. The absence of a pre-agreed kill line is not patience. It is an unpriced liability that the board has almost certainly not been shown.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Component 4: Tracking. </strong>Report the portfolio to the board on a fixed cadence using a single instrument: The AI Portfolio Scorecard. Not a deck of project updates, but a single view of allocation by horizon, burn against milestone, liquidation decisions taken and capital reallocated to survivors. The cadence is the control. A portfolio reviewed once a year is a portfolio managed by hope.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>THE AI PORTFOLIO SCORECARD: SCORE EVERY INITIATIVE BEFORE IT IS FUNDED</strong></p>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><div class="overflow-table-wrapper"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><thead><tr><td><strong>Evaluation criterion</strong></td><td><strong>0</strong></td><td><strong>1</strong></td><td><strong>2</strong></td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Horizon assigned (H1 / H2 / H3) and documented before funding</td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>Success metric matched to the horizon, not a default quarterly ROI</td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>Kill line set: Named milestone and date, agreed at funding</td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>Owner named with explicit authority to stop the initiative</td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>Fits a deliberate allocation band, not an accidental addition</td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>Odds-raising path documented: Buy or partner and an integration plan</td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr></tbody></table> </div></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Score each criterion: 0 = not present, 1 = partially documented, 2 = fully verified. Total out of 12. Bands: 0 to 4 = DO NOT FUND  |  5 to 8 = CONDITIONAL  |  9 to 12 = FUND.</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>THE LIQUIDATION GATE: RUN AT EVERY BOARD REVIEW BEFORE CONTINUING FUNDING</strong></p>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><div class="overflow-table-wrapper"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><thead><tr><td><strong>Review test</strong></td><td><strong>Status</strong></td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Milestone for this horizon met or credibly on track</td><td>PASS / FAIL</td></tr><tr><td>Burn within plan to the next milestone</td><td>PASS / FAIL</td></tr><tr><td>Still fits the allocation band, with no quiet horizon drift</td><td>PASS / FAIL</td></tr><tr><td>Owner confirms continued strategic fit</td><td>PASS / FAIL</td></tr></tbody></table> </div></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Any unresolved FAIL = stop funding, liquidate the position, reallocate the capital to a survivor and record the decision on the scorecard.</em></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The cost of the timing error</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The financial case follows the pattern and is consistent. Consider two organizations that funded the same class of Horizon 3 bet: A domain-specific agent platform meant to compound over three years. The first review was conducted at month six against a quarterly return test, found no payback and killed it, booking the write-off as a lesson about AI being overhyped. Its competitor classified the same work as Horizon 3, set an 18-month capability milestone, protected funding through two review cycles and shipped to production within the window the work actually required. One organization spent its money to learn that it lacks allocation discipline. The other spent comparable money and now owns a capability its rival has abandoned and cannot quickly rebuild. The dollars on the two income statements are similar. The competitive positions are not.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The governance return the board has been waiting for</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Allocation discipline does two things at once. It stops the bleed by liquidating failures on a schedule rather than at the point of exhaustion. And it concentrates capital where the entire return lives, in the small number of bets that survive their horizon. The 5 percent figure is not a ceiling imposed by the technology. It is the current yield of an industry allocated by hype. An organization that classifies by horizon, allocates on purpose, liquidates on a line and tracks on a cadence is not trying to beat the technology. It is trying to beat its own indiscipline, and that is a far more winnable contest.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The board conversation about AI returns is coming for every organization, and it arrives the moment the spending outpaces the story. When it does, the CIO will be asked a simple question: Where did the money go? The leaders who can answer will not show a pile of pilots. They will show a portfolio: What was funded, against which horizon, what was liquidated and when, and what the survivors are now worth. Subtraction is a strategy. The only question is whether you are practicing it on purpose or about to learn it by accident.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Asymmetric warfare in financial services: AI-powered fraud demands unified command]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Military strategists know that asymmetric wars are lost not at the point of attack but at the seams between defensive units, where no single commander owns the territory and information moves slower than the threat. In January 2024, a finance employee at Arup’s Hong Kong office learned this lesso...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683476/it-security-nachrichten/asymmetric-warfare-in-financial-services-ai-powered-fraud-demands-unified-command/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683476/it-security-nachrichten/asymmetric-warfare-in-financial-services-ai-powered-fraud-demands-unified-command/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 13:08:50 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Military strategists know that asymmetric wars are lost not at the point of attack but at the seams between defensive units, where no single commander owns the territory and information moves slower than the threat. In January 2024, a finance employee at Arup’s Hong Kong office learned this lesson for $25 million, joining a video call with what appeared to be the engineering firm’s chief financial officer and several colleagues, receiving instructions to wire funds to a designated account, and complying. Every face on the screen was a deepfake, cloned from publicly available footage of the actual executives. The attackers conducted the entire meeting in real time and vanished before anyone in the organization realized the CFO had never logged on.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The incident would be remarkable enough as a one-off, but it represents a pattern accelerating well beyond isolated cases. <a href="https://nilsonreport.com/articles/card-fraud-losses-worldwide-2024/">Global payment fraud reached $33.4 billion in 2024</a> according to the Nilson Report, and the US absorbed a disproportionate 42% of those losses despite processing only 25% of global card transactions. The latest FBI Internet Crime report identifies <a href="https://www.fbi.gov/news/press-releases/cryptocurrency-and-ai-scams-bilk-americans-of-billions">more than one million complaints and nearly $21 billion in cyber-enabled crime losses in 2025</a> (up from $16 million in 2023), while Deloitte projects <a href="https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/financial-services/deepfake-banking-fraud-risk-on-the-rise.html">AI-enabled fraud in the US will hit $40 billion by 2027</a>. This increasingly includes crypto-related fraud, not just credit card or traditional banking fraud.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For anyone who oversees financial operations, risk or payment technology infrastructure, these numbers are not forecasts of a future “regional conflict.” Instead, they are the current cost of a war most institutions have not yet recognized they are fighting.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>Reconnaissance at scale: How AI redraws the attacker’s map</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The conventional narrative around AI-powered fraud emphasizes speed: Faster phishing, faster credential stuffing, faster social engineering. Jason Kikta, CTO of<a href="https://www.automox.com/"> Automox</a>, sees the shift differently. “The main threat from AI misuse isn’t faster execution, as automation has been leveraged for years,” Kikta says. “The true dangers are lower barriers to entry and faster adaptation, giving attackers the ability to pivot techniques in near real-time.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The distinction means that execution is a quantitative improvement, the kind existing defenses can absorb by scaling up. Lower barriers to entry and real-time adaptation are qualitative: A force multiplier that turns every amateur into an equipped operator with a coach that learns from each failed attempt. Deepfake-as-a-service platforms now produce voice clones from three seconds of audio. AI-driven vulnerability scanning maps an institution’s unpatched endpoints while the security team is still scheduling the review meeting. In 2024, 269 million stolen credit card records appeared on dark web platforms, giving AI-equipped attackers what military intelligence analysts would call an order of battle: A detailed map of the defender’s exposed positions, ready to be mined for patterns, tested against live systems and exploited at machine speed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The result is a combined arms threat, one that operates across domains simultaneously the way a competent military force coordinates air, ground and intelligence rather than running them as independent campaigns. The same AI that crafts a convincing business email compromise can probe unpatched point-of-sale systems to install digital skimmers. The same synthetic identity that opens a fraudulent credit card account can exploit a payment authorization vulnerability discovered through automated scanning. Card-not-present fraud now accounts for 71% of all US card fraud losses, and the attack surface keeps expanding as digital wallets and e-commerce push more transactions into channels where physical card verification is impossible.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Attackers treat endpoint management gaps and transaction monitoring gaps as a single attack surface, while most defenders continue to patrol them as separate territories.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>Fragmented command: The structural vulnerability AI exploits</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Consider how most financial institutions, crypto platforms and digital asset intermediaries actually organize their defenses: A cybersecurity team focused on identity compromise, endpoint protection and infrastructure threats; a fraud team focused on account takeover, mule networks and scam typologies; an AML or financial crimes team focused on wallet screening, sanctions exposure and suspicious activity reporting; and an AI risk or digital trust team, if one exists at all, focused on synthetic media, model abuse and impersonation. Each function has its own tooling, budget, reporting line and intelligence feeds. In crypto markets, where value can move irreversibly across wallets, chains, mixers, exchanges and OTC brokers in minutes, those silos create exploitable gaps between detection, attribution, interdiction and recovery.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A pig-butchering scam that begins on a dating app, migrates to WhatsApp, directs a victim to a fake crypto investment platform, and then launders proceeds through nested services and cross-chain bridges is not just a fraud event. It is also a cybersecurity event, a financial crimes event, an identity event, a platform abuse event and, increasingly, an AI-enabled social engineering event. Chainalysis reported that high-yield investment scams and pig-butchering schemes were among the most successful crypto scam types in 2024, while also noting growing use of AI in fraud and scams.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Research published by the University of California, Davis found that these schemes follow a staged lifecycle: Trust-building, fabricated investment returns, escalating deposits, withdrawal obstruction and re-targeting of victims after the initial loss. When each part of that lifecycle is monitored by a different team, the institution sees fragments of the attack rather than the economic system of the crime.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Fraud no longer happens in isolated channels,” observes Jeff Li, Global Product &amp; Designer Lead at Binance. “AI-powered scams move seamlessly across platforms, and payment systems, making fragmented defenses increasingly ineffective.” He believes that the future of <a href="https://www.binance.com/en/blog/security/2953911729763975700">security depends on unified intelligence</a> — combining AI, real-time monitoring, secure infrastructure and cross-functional response mechanisms into a single coordinated defense system.<br><br>“We’ve invested heavily in AI-driven risk detection, real-time scam warnings and infrastructure to stay ahead of evolving threats, continues Li, claiming that from Q1 2025 to Q1 2026, these efforts helped Binance prevent over $10 billion in potential user losses and protected more than 5 million users globally. As AI continues to reshape both fraud and fraud prevention, the focus remains on building systems that can protect users, not just at scale, but in real time.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>Unified command: From org chart to battle plan</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Kikta’s assessment contains a contrarian detail worth teasing apart: “The good news is that a strong compliance program prioritizing depth of coverage and speed of enforcement will hold up against AI-enabled fraud,” he says. In a landscape saturated with predictions that existing defenses are obsolete, Kikta argues that the fundamentals of patch management, endpoint hygiene and compliance rigor still hold, provided the clock speed at which those fundamentals execute keeps pace with the adversary.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That clock speed is the operational link between cybersecurity and card fraud prevention. An unpatched point-of-sale terminal or payment gateway exposed for 30 days represents 30 days of reconnaissance opportunity for an AI scanner probing for places to install a digital skimmer or intercept card data in transit. A compliance gap in identity verification is an open invitation for synthetic identities to open accounts and run fraudulent transactions. Endpoint management data and transaction monitoring data describe the same attack surface from different angles, and fusing those streams into a single operational picture, the financial equivalent of a military intelligence fusion center, gives defenders something the current siloed structure cannot: Visibility into an attack developing across domains before it reaches the payment layer.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The value of that convergence extends beyond defense. A unified data layer across cyber, fraud and payments creates consolidated threat intelligence that can inform underwriting decisions, merchant risk scoring and product design. Organizations that treat converged security data as a business intelligence asset (not merely an operational feed) will find they have built something with commercial utility well beyond the security operations center.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Mascaro frames the prescription in terms that belong in a boardroom, not a SOC. “The real competitive advantage in fraud isn’t your AI stack,” he says. “It’s leadership’s clarity to unify risk disciplines that everyone else keeps in separate departments.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>Field manual: What winning institutions do differently</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The institutions gaining ground in this new form of asymmetric conflict share a common operational posture: They treat endpoint management as card fraud prevention rather than IT maintenance, and they feed cyber, fraud and payments intelligence into a single picture rather than three separate briefings. The defensive AI advantage, such as it is, comes from that integration, not from any single model’s sophistication.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Adversaries have already unified their operations. Yet, payment processors and financial institutions that keep running separate campaigns on separate fronts, with separate intelligence, will keep conducting after-action reviews of battles they have already lost.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Thinking of Upgrading Your TV? The 77-Inch LG B5 OLED Just Hit Huge Discounts]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Bring the ultimate home theater screen into your living room for $1,600 off with this incredible LG B5 OLED deal.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683267/it-nachrichten/thinking-of-upgrading-your-tv-the-77-inch-lg-b5-oled-just-hit-huge-discounts/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683267/it-nachrichten/thinking-of-upgrading-your-tv-the-77-inch-lg-b5-oled-just-hit-huge-discounts/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 11:50:12 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Bring the ultimate home theater screen into your living room for $1,600 off with this incredible LG B5 OLED deal.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[KI-Songs bekommen Label – doch die Musik spielt woanders]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag KI-Songs bekommen Label – doch die Musik spielt woanders erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Jeden Tag werden zehntausende vollständig mit KI generierte Songs auf Streamingdiensten h...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683136/it-security-nachrichten/ki-songs-bekommen-label-doch-die-musik-spielt-woanders/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683136/it-security-nachrichten/ki-songs-bekommen-label-doch-die-musik-spielt-woanders/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 11:10:49 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/21/label-kennzeichnung-ki-songs/">KI-Songs bekommen Label – doch die Musik spielt woanders</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Jeden Tag werden zehntausende vollständig mit KI generierte Songs auf Streamingdiensten hochgeladen. 97 Prozent der Hörer können diese aber nicht von menschlicher Musik unterscheiden. Ein Zusammenschluss renommierter Musikverbände will deshalb mit einem neuen Kennzeichnungssystem für Transparenz sorgen. Doch das Konzept hat entscheidende Schwächen – und kratzt allenfalls an der Oberfläche. Eine kommentierende Analyse. Wie die […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/21/label-kennzeichnung-ki-songs/">KI-Songs bekommen Label – doch die Musik spielt woanders</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[SaaS will survive, but lazy SaaS is dead]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Something interesting happened during an internal evaluation of AI meeting transcription tools at Tungsten Automation. The products worked. They weren’t bad. But sitting across from the pricing, we kept asking the same question: what exactly are we paying for? 



We already had a secure enterpri...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683122/ai-nachrichten/saas-will-survive-but-lazy-saas-is-dead/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683122/ai-nachrichten/saas-will-survive-but-lazy-saas-is-dead/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 11:05:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Something interesting happened during an internal evaluation of AI meeting transcription tools at Tungsten Automation. The products worked. They weren’t bad. But sitting across from the pricing, we kept asking the same question: what exactly are we paying for? </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We already had a secure enterprise AI environment. Building a meeting summary workflow took days, not months. We customized the outputs, injected our own internal context, and controlled security our way instead of working around someone else’s roadmap. We built it. It works better. We own it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That’s not a knock on those vendors. It’s a signal of something more fundamental happening across enterprise software.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The moat was never the product</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For two decades, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2256637/what-is-saas-software-as-a-service-defined.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2256637/what-is-saas-software-as-a-service-defined.html">SaaS</a> rode a favorable asymmetry: building internal tools was hard, integrations were messy, and even modest automation required developers and long timelines. Buying was faster and cheaper than building. That asymmetry fueled the explosion of SaaS into every corner of the enterprise stack.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI is collapsing that asymmetry. Large language models and agentic workflows can orchestrate APIs, move data between systems, generate interfaces, and automate business logic with a fraction of the engineering effort required even two years ago. The integration friction that once protected entire product categories is evaporating.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The vendors most exposed are not the deeply embedded enterprise platforms. They’re the lightweight workflow layers, the products that essentially put a polished interface on top of accessible data and relatively straightforward processes. Reporting dashboards. Meeting tools. Narrow productivity applications. These products created value by simplifying implementation. That rationale is getting harder to sustain when implementation is no longer the real barrier.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Here’s the part most analyses miss: it’s not just that AI makes development faster. It’s that agents change the integration model entirely. For 30 years, enterprise software was built for humans navigating UIs. Agentic systems don’t use UIs. They call <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2269032/what-is-an-api-application-programming-interfaces-explained.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2269032/what-is-an-api-application-programming-interfaces-explained.html">APIs</a>, read from multiple sources simultaneously, and move data freely across systems. The switching costs that once made incumbent software sticky are collapsing, because an agent doesn’t care which UI it used last quarter.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The SaaS that survives</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The question isn’t whether SaaS survives. It’s which SaaS survives.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The companies with durable positions are not the ones with the cleanest interface. They’re the ones that transfer operational risk customers genuinely cannot absorb themselves. Compliance. Regulatory certification. Accumulated domain expertise. Liability.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Think about compliant invoicing across 140 countries. That’s not a workflow someone builds in a sprint. The certifications alone take years. A single regulatory change in one jurisdiction can break an AP process for a global enterprise overnight. Customers don’t pay for that capability because it’s technically complex. They pay because they cannot afford to own the risk of getting it wrong.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That’s the distinction that matters: AI lowers the cost of building software. It does not lower the cost of absorbing risk. The vendors who understand this are building durable businesses. The ones who don’t are quietly subsidizing their customers’ internal build programs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Software sells features. Platforms sell accountability.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The prototype trap</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The danger for enterprise buyers right now is overcorrection. Every successful prototype looks like a cost-saving opportunity. Very few survive the jump to production.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Building a workflow with <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2338115/what-is-generative-ai-artificial-intelligence-that-creates.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2338115/what-is-generative-ai-artificial-intelligence-that-creates.html">generative AI</a> is becoming straightforward. Maintaining it is not. Models evolve. Outputs drift. Governance requirements tighten. What worked cleanly in a controlled environment behaves differently at scale, and the failure mode is worse than traditional software. Rule-based automation, when it fails, fails obviously. Agents fail silently, confidently, at scale, often with a completely reasonable-sounding explanation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Engineering teams that take on AI-powered systems need to solve for observability, model drift, access controls, audit trails, and long-term maintenance ownership. In regulated industries, they need to demonstrate exactly how the system reached every decision. That’s not a weekend project. That’s an ongoing operational commitment that compounds over time as models change and regulatory requirements evolve.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Before a team decides to replace an external platform with internal AI tooling, the honest question isn’t, “Can we build this?” The real question is, “Are we prepared to own this in production, for years, as the underlying models change beneath us?” Sometimes the answer is yes. Often the answer is no, and the true cost only becomes visible after the vendor contract is canceled.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Build vs. partner: a sharper frame</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The build vs. buy framing has always been too binary. The right question is build vs. partner.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Partner for the capabilities where risk transfer, regulatory complexity, and domain expertise create genuine value your team cannot replicate. Build for the capabilities that actually differentiate your business from your competitors. Don’t burn your best engineers rebuilding compliant invoice processing or production-grade document extraction. Those aren’t competitive advantages. They’re table stakes, and someone else has already paid the cost, across decades, to make them reliable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The organizations getting this right are honest about where they create unique value. They focus development there, and partner for everything else. The ones getting it wrong are vibe-coding solutions to non-differentiating problems while their actual competitive moat goes unattended.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The true value of software</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We’re not watching the death of SaaS. We’re watching the end of the friction-based value proposition: the idea that software is worth renewing because integration used to be painful. That rationale is largely gone.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What survives is software that does something customers cannot reasonably replicate internally: absorb risk, maintain regulatory compliance, deliver operational reliability at scale, and bring genuine domain expertise into a production-grade system that someone else already stress-tested for years.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The vendors who recognize this are already repositioning around accountability, governance, and outcomes. The ones who haven’t will find the next renewal conversation noticeably harder.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Software sells features. Platforms sell accountability. That distinction is about to separate a lot of winners from a lot of cautionary tales.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>—</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/blogs/new-tech-forum"><strong><em>New Tech Forum</em></strong></a><em><strong> provides a venue for technology leaders—including vendors and other outside contributors—to explore and discuss emerging enterprise technology in unprecedented depth and breadth. The selection is subjective, based on our pick of the technologies we believe to be important and of greatest interest to InfoWorld readers. InfoWorld does not accept marketing collateral for publication and reserves the right to edit all contributed content. Send all </strong></em><em><strong>inquiries to </strong></em><a href="mailto:doug_dineley@foundryco.com"><strong><em>doug_dineley@foundryco.com</em></strong></a><em><strong>.</strong></em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How AI impacts site reliability engineering]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Site reliability engineers (SREs) have the tough assignment of resolving thorny performance and reliability issues. But their primary mission is to provide devops teams with operational insights and to suggest implementation improvements on business system performance, security, and overall robus...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683121/ai-nachrichten/how-ai-impacts-site-reliability-engineering/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683121/ai-nachrichten/how-ai-impacts-site-reliability-engineering/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 11:05:12 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Site reliability engineers (SREs) have the tough assignment of resolving thorny performance and reliability issues. But their primary mission is to provide devops teams with operational insights and to suggest implementation improvements on business system performance, security, and overall robustness.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Google introduced its <a href="https://sre.google/sre-book/part-I-introduction/">SRE playbook</a> in 2003, but it took some time for the role’s definition, tools, and techniques to become mainstream. Startups were the first to adopt observability for cloud-native applications and create dedicated SRE positions. As tools matured and SRE responsibilities became more clearly defined, larger enterprises assigned SREs to work as a bridge between devops and IT ops teams to improve resilience across a wider range of applications, APIs, and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3487711/the-definitive-guide-to-data-pipelines.html">data pipelines</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3689881/career-paths-for-devops-engineers-and-sres.html">SRE is a career path</a> for multidisciplinary engineers with strong investigative instincts, sharp data analytics skills, and the temperament to perform under pressure. It has become a critical responsibility as tech became mission-critical for enterprises, and it is <a href="https://drive.starcio.com/2025/02/emerging-genai-roles-hr-tech-security/">a growing role in the genAI era</a> as more businesses <a href="https://drive.starcio.com/2025/10/ai-agents-definitive-guide-saas-security-titans/">deploy AI agents</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But the critical need for resiliency and greater technological complexity brings new challenges for SREs. According to the <a href="https://neubird.ai/resources/state-of-production-reliability-and-ai-adoption/">2026 State of Production Reliability and AI Adoption report</a>, 44% of respondents experienced an outage linked to ignored or suppressed alerts in the past year, and 35% report their engineers occasionally ignore or dismiss alerts due to alert fatigue. More than 70% of alerts received are not actionable, according to 57% of organizations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">So, is AI making the SRE’s role easier and helping businesses run more reliable technology operations? On the other hand, AI is also driving complexity, as companies deploy genAI tools and AI agents across more business functions and seek to automate more decision-making across operations.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">AIops and agentic ops aid SREs</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Over the past decade, SRE responsibilities have become somewhat easier through improvements in <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2263821/5-devops-practices-to-improve-application-reliability.html">monitoring platforms</a>, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3686056/best-practices-for-devops-observability.html">observability practices</a>, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2261769/what-is-the-ai-in-aiops.html">tools for centralizing operational data</a>, and <a href="https://drive.starcio.com/2022/01/aiops-cio/">AI applied in IT operations</a> (AIops). But during the heat of resolving an outage or performance issue, it’s not easy to correctly identify what system triggered the issue versus other downstream systems impacted by it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to the <a href="https://komodor.com/resources/komodor-2025-enterprise-kubernetes-report/">Komodore 2025 Enterprise Kubernetes Report</a>, 79% of production incidents originate from recent system changes, including deployments and changes to compute environments. But the other 21% of incidents stem from issues outside of the business’s control, including network failures, third-party changes, and cloud provider failures.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“SREs using AI capabilities succeed or fail in the moment an incident unfolds, when engineers are deciding what to investigate next,” says Itiel Shwartz, CTO at <a href="https://komodor.com/">Komodor</a>. “If the system streamlines root cause detection, connects signals to recent changes, and explains its reasoning in a way engineers recognize, it earns trust. If it adds uncertainty or demands extra validation, it gets sidelined, regardless of how bespoke the model behind it may be. What’s less obvious is what it takes to make AI for SREs work in production, and how different that reality is from prototypes, demos, or early internal builds.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://drive.starcio.com/2022/05/aiops-ml-multicloud/">AIops</a> is not a new capability, especially in using machine learning to correlate logs, metrics, and traces across monitoring and alerting systems. IT service management and SREs have been using AIops to <a href="https://drive.starcio.com/2021/11/p1-incidents-long-resolution-times/">reduce the mean time to resolve incidents</a> and to perform accurate <a href="https://drive.starcio.com/2021/12/kpi-agile-devops-itops/">root cause analysis</a> (RCA) efficiently. <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4100507/5-key-agenticops-practices-to-start-building-now.html">Agentic ops</a> is the next wave of genAI operational capabilities, including tools for monitoring AI agents, managing their access rights, and detecting AI model accuracy drift.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"> “AI is useful during major incidents because it can pull together a lot of context into a few clear sentences, which is exactly what an SRE needs in the moment,” suggests Shani Shoham, chief revenue officer at <a href="https://openobserve.ai/">OpenObserve</a>. “The complexity of architecture and the different tooling make it easier for AI than for a human, but autonomous resolution is still a way off.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">AI’s impact on people and burnout</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The business pressure to keep systems up, secure, and performing well is a 24/7 stressful responsibility. According to <a href="https://www.catchpoint.com/learn/sre-report-2025">The SRE Report 2025</a> from Catchpoint, 36% of SREs often or always experience elevated stress during an incident, and 28% said the stress persists even after the incident is resolved. AI capabilities may prove to be a game-changer in helping SREs avoid burnout and reduce stress.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“AI can improve RCA by taking in a much larger incident context than any engineer can hold at 3am, reasoning across traces, logs, metrics, deploys, config changes, alerts, ownership, and recent production behavior,” says Noam Levy, founding engineer and field CTO at <a href="https://www.groundcover.com/">Groundcover</a>. “Beyond attempting a full RCA, its immediate value is distilling the signals that actually matter, reconstructing a clear timeline of cause and effect, and helping engineers separate correlation from likely causality. Once a fix is deployed, agents can also verify remediation by comparing pre- and post-fix behavior, but this depends on broad access to rich, correlated production signals and a cost model that does not discourage adoption or experimentation.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Not only are incidents resolved faster and with less stress, but AI can also free up SRE time to focus on proactive work and create a career path for junior developers into SRE roles. Quais Taraki, CTO at <a href="https://www.enterprisedb.com/">EDB Postgres AI</a>, adds, “AI reduces toil by automating repetitive tasks while accelerating incident resolution through copilots that correlate signals across distributed systems, allowing SREs to focus more on resilience strategies like chaos engineering and failure analysis.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI can have long-lasting operational impacts, especially for organizations looking to deploy more mission-critical technology and AI capabilities. Two longer-term benefits of AI for SREs are reducing the number of bridge calls needed for incident response and the number of engineers required in “<a href="https://drive.starcio.com/2021/04/it-digital-operations-aiops/">war rooms</a>” to coordinate root cause analyses.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“When something goes wrong, AI that guides SREs can do the full analysis, get to the root cause, and perform the remediation,” says Spiros Xanthos, founder and CEO of <a href="https://resolve.ai/">Resolve AI</a>. “AI also helps avoid many escalations, and when escalations are needed, it targets the right people from the network, infrastructure, and the application teams. AI for SREs centralizes operational intelligence, exposes tribal knowledge, and can guide more junior developers.” </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">AI agent reliability</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While AI capabilities have been a net positive in helping SREs improve system reliability, the growth of <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4032989/a-developers-guide-to-code-generation.html">AI code generators</a>, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4058076/vibe-coding-and-the-future-of-software-development.html">vibe coding</a>, and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4166817/vibe-coding-or-spec-driven-development.html">spec-driven development</a> is adding to their workloads. <a href="https://www.braiviq.com/blog/vibe-coding-ai-development-2026-cursor-copilot-claude-code">According to one study</a>, 41% of all global code is now AI-generated, and <a href="https://www.hostinger.com/blog/vibe-coding-statistics">Gartner predicts</a> that 40% of new enterprise production software will be created using vibe coding techniques by 2028.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But coding velocity is creating new issues for SREs as AI pull requests have 1.4 times more critical issues and 1.7 times more major issues, <a href="https://www.coderabbit.ai/blog/state-of-ai-vs-human-code-generation-report">according to CodeRabbit</a>. “AI-assisted development has created an unprecedented velocity of code reaching production, expanding surface area, edge cases, and failure rates faster than traditional SRE practices can absorb,” says Vinod Jayaraman, cofounder and CTO at <a href="https://neubird.ai/">NeuBird AI</a>. “The speed of shipping has far outpaced the speed of understanding what breaks in production. To close this loop, SREs need enterprise agents that can capture precise diagnostic context, including correlated traces, service dependencies, and anomaly timelines, and structure it as actionable input for the engineers and AI coding tools responsible for the fix.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The growing number of AI agents deployed to production creates new challenges. AI agents are not just code; they have multiple failure points. They are built using language models, connect to proprietary sources for context, and integrate with <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4124612/5-requirements-for-using-mcp-servers-to-connect-ai-agents.html">Model Context Protocol servers</a> to support more complex workflows. Changes are ongoing and not deployment events, so the SRE’s job of identifying the source of performance and accuracy drifts isn’t trivial. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Traditional SRE was built for systems that fail in reproducible ways, but agents fail differently and drift when a model provider pushes an update, and behavior shifts silently with no baseline for comparison,” says Mohammed Aboul-Magd, vice president of product at <a href="https://www.sandboxaq.com/">SandboxAQ</a>. “Most organizations can’t even answer the basics: how many agents are running, what they have access to, and whether they’re still doing what they were built to do.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Every time a senior engineer leaves, they take years of learned failure patterns with them, and the next outage starts from square one,” adds Ronak Desai, cofounder and CEO at <a href="https://ciroos.ai/">Ciroos</a>. “Using AI for compounding operational memory changes that, and every incident your system resolves, the AI learns it.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">SREs should take a leadership role in emerging best practices, including defining their standards for AI agent <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4061123/how-to-write-nonfunctional-requirements-for-ai-agents.html">non-functional acceptance criteria</a>, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4140832/7-safeguards-for-observable-ai-agents.html">observability practices</a>, and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4105884/10-essential-release-criteria-for-launching-ai-agents.html">release-readiness criteria</a>. SREs should update their <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3684268/tools-to-manage-slos-and-error-budgets.html">service-level objectives</a> (SLOs) and define error budgets for AI agents in production.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ryan Downing, vice president and CIO of enterprise business solutions at <a href="https://www.principal.com/">Principal Financial Group</a>, says, “Standard SLOs and error budgets give teams the guardrails, and AI helps interpret the telemetry against those targets, reducing noise so engineers can get to the real issue faster and automate parts of remediation before customers are impacted.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">AI raises the SRE’s business impact</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The more dramatic shift in site reliability engineering is an evolution of its business scope. IT leaders focus on uptime, performance, and issue resolution, as well as understanding their impacts. Business leaders will look to IT and SREs to identify, determine root cause, and remediate a broader class of issues, including <a href="https://drive.starcio.com/2025/07/rogue-ai-agents-cios-govern-agentic-ecosystem/">rogue AI agents</a> and the impacts of <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4040513/how-to-avoid-the-risks-of-rapidly-deploying-ai-agents.html">rapidly deploying new agentic capabilities</a>. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“AI agents are handing SREs categories of problems they’ve never had to solve before, specifically failures defined in business terms, not technical ones,” says Blake Sherwood, distinguished technologist for AI and platform strategy at <a href="https://www.smarsh.com/">Smarsh</a>. “Traditional reliability engineering is built around latency, errors, and crashes, but agents now fail due to skipped compliance steps or outcomes that looked fine technically but were wrong contextually. Most SRE teams aren’t wired for that yet.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The question is whether SREs with AI-augmented tools can keep up with the velocity, complexity, and business urgency of deploying new AI business capabilities.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The next AI bottleneck is not the model. It’s the infrastructure behind it]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Every enterprise AI conversation seems to begin with the same question: Which model should we use?



I understand why. Models are visible. They have names, benchmarks, release notes, pricing pages and impressive demos. They are easy to compare in a leadership meeting. One model promises better r...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683109/it-nachrichten/the-next-ai-bottleneck-is-not-the-model-its-the-infrastructure-behind-it/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683109/it-nachrichten/the-next-ai-bottleneck-is-not-the-model-its-the-infrastructure-behind-it/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 11:03:50 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Every enterprise AI conversation seems to begin with the same question: Which model should we use?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I understand why. Models are visible. They have names, benchmarks, release notes, pricing pages and impressive demos. They are easy to compare in a leadership meeting. One model promises better reasoning. Another offers a larger context window. Another appears faster, cheaper or more specialized.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But after years of working around enterprise platforms, integration layers, cloud migration, middleware, production operations and mission-critical systems, I see the AI conversation differently.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The model matters. But it is not where most enterprises will struggle next.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The next AI bottleneck is the infrastructure behind the model.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I do not mean only GPUs, cloud capacity or data storage. I mean the full enterprise operating layer that allows AI to work safely in the real world: data pipelines, identity, APIs, messaging, observability, security controls, deployment automation, cost governance, auditability, support ownership and recovery design.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That layer is what determines whether AI remains an exciting experiment or becomes a trusted business capability.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Pilots hide the hard part</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most organizations can build an <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4159287/most-companies-are-stuck-on-ai-chat.html">impressive AI pilot</a>. A small team can connect a model to a dataset, create a workflow and show a use case that works well in a controlled setting.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The harder part starts when that pilot moves into a <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4161509/ai-hype-to-ai-value-escaping-the-activity-trap.html">real production process</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is when practical questions show up. Who owns the data quality? What systems can the AI access? How do we trace which prompt, policy or retrieval flow produced a specific answer? What happens when an API slows down, a queue backs up or a downstream system is unavailable?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To me, these are not model problems. They are infrastructure problems.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is where many enterprises are now headed. The first phase of AI was experimentation. The next phase is operationalization, and that is where the real gap becomes clear.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/seizing-the-agentic-ai-advantage">McKinsey</a> has made a similar point in its work on agentic AI, noting that the next phase of value depends less on isolated tools and more on redesigning workflows, operating models and enterprise execution around agents.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI pilots can survive on enthusiasm. Production AI requires architecture.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">AI is becoming an integration problem</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The more I look at enterprise AI, the more it feels like an integration challenge.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In large organizations, I have seen how messaging platforms, integration gateways, deployment pipelines, monitoring tools and cloud infrastructure can decide whether a digital capability succeeds or fails. AI will be no different. Even the strongest model will struggle if the data, middleware, identity layer and operational controls around it are weak.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI does not work in isolation. It needs context from systems of record, clean data from different business areas, secure access to APIs, event streams, workflows, knowledge repositories, monitoring tools and legacy systems.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is why the CIO question is changing.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It is no longer just, “Which AI tool should we buy?”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It is becoming, “Can we safely operationalize intelligence across the business?”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is where agentic AI matters. Autonomous AI only creates real value when the architecture around it can make its actions safe, traceable and useful.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A model can generate an answer. Infrastructure determines whether that answer is secure, timely, explainable, governed and connected to the right workflow.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For example, an AI assistant that summarizes customer or order information may look like a model use case. But underneath, it depends on access control, fresh data, reliable APIs, logging, encryption, monitoring and policy enforcement.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If the answer is wrong, people may blame the model. But the real failure may have started with stale data, weak integration, poor access design, missing observability or an unreliable downstream system.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is why CIOs should not judge AI only by model capability. The enterprise system around the model matters just as much.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Latency will become a trust issue</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In traditional technology operations, latency is often treated as a performance metric. In AI-enabled workflows, latency becomes a trust issue.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When an employee asks an AI assistant for help and the response takes too long, the employee stops using it. When a customer-facing workflow becomes slow, the customer abandons it. When an AI agent waits on multiple backend calls, the entire business process feels unreliable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This becomes even more important as organizations move from simple chat interfaces to agentic workflows. A single AI-driven action may include identity checks, context retrieval, policy validation, model reasoning, API calls, business-rule execution, logging and human approval.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Each step adds latency. Each dependency adds a possible failure point.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A model may be fast in a benchmark but slow inside an enterprise process. That difference matters.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is where platform engineering becomes essential. Enterprises need reusable patterns for AI workloads: approved connectors, secure retrieval methods, queue-based decoupling, caching strategies, deployment pipelines, monitoring dashboards and standard rollback procedures.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Without those patterns, every AI initiative becomes a custom build. Custom builds may work for pilots, but they do not scale across a large enterprise.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Observability has to expand</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Traditional monitoring tells us whether infrastructure is healthy. Is the server up? Is CPU high? Is memory exhausted? Is the application returning errors?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI needs that, but it also needs more.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We need to know what data was retrieved, which model was used, which prompt version was active, which user initiated the request, which policy was applied, how long each step took and whether the output passed validation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We also need to detect new forms of risk: unusual usage patterns, repeated failed tool calls, unexpected cost spikes, sensitive data exposure, weak retrieval results or an AI workflow attempting actions outside its intended boundary.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In production AI, observability is not only about uptime. It is about confidence.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If a business leader, auditor, regulator or security team asks why an AI system made a recommendation, the answer cannot be, “The model said so.” The enterprise needs traceability. It needs evidence. It needs operational context that engineers, risk teams and business owners can understand.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is one of the biggest gaps I see in AI strategy. Many organizations are investing in models and use cases, but not enough in the control plane required to manage them.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Data readiness is still underestimated</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI has exposed an uncomfortable truth: many enterprises are not as data ready as they think.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Data is often duplicated across platforms, described differently by each team, governed inconsistently and refreshed on different schedules. Access rules may be clear in one system but unclear in another. Even basic business definitions can change from department to department.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI does not fix that automatically. In many cases, it makes the problem more visible.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A bad report may be questioned. A bad AI answer may sound confident enough to be trusted.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is a real risk.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Being data-ready for AI is not just about connecting a vector database or indexing documents. It requires clear ownership, lineage, classification, quality checks, retention rules, access boundaries and a shared understanding of which data should be used for which purpose.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The same principle applies to resilient cloud-native design. In my IEEE TechRxiv paper, “<a href="https://www.techrxiv.org/doi/full/10.36227/techrxiv.175433366.65304469/v1">Enabling Fault-Tolerant Multicast in Cloud-Native Architectures</a>” I explored how reliability, observability and fault tolerance become foundational requirements when critical workloads stretch across hybrid and multi-cloud environments.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CIOs already understand this because they have lived through enterprise resource planning programs, cloud migration, integration modernization, cybersecurity transformation and analytics initiatives. The lesson is familiar: technology cannot outrun data discipline forever.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Security cannot be added later</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As AI moves from answering questions to acting, security becomes much more important.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">An assistant that summarizes information carries one level of risk. An agent that can open a ticket, update a record, trigger a workflow, approve a request or contact a customer carries a very different one.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The more AI can do, the more identity, authorization, least privilege, separation of duties and human approval matter.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Enterprises should be careful not to grant AI broad access just to speed up a pilot. That may seem harmless in development, but it can become dangerous at scale.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI access should be treated like any other privileged enterprise capability: limited, logged, reviewed and easy to revoke.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The <a href="https://www.nist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework">NIST</a> AI Risk Management Framework is a useful reference point here because it frames AI risk as something organizations must govern, map, measure and manage continuously rather than something handled only at the end of deployment.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Security teams should be involved early, not at the end. The goal is not to slow innovation. The goal is to build a platform where safe innovation becomes repeatable.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The CIO has to define the operating model</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI is creating pressure from every direction. Boards want productivity. Business teams want automation. Employees want better tools. Vendors are pushing new features. Security teams are watching risk. Finance teams are watching cost. Customers expect faster, smarter experiences.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The CIO sits in the middle of all of it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is why the CIO’s role cannot stop at choosing tools or approving pilots. The CIO has to define how AI will actually operate across the enterprise.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That means answering practical questions. Which architecture is approved? Which data sources can be trusted? How are AI workflows deployed, monitored, supported and governed? How are costs controlled? How do teams reuse common patterns instead of rebuilding the same foundation each time?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This work may not be as exciting as a model demo, but it is what separates sustainable AI from short-term experimentation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The winning organizations will not be the ones with the most pilots. They will be the ones with the strongest AI operating layer.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">They will build reusable platform patterns, strengthen data governance, design access properly, monitor AI behavior end to end and measure success by business improvement, not only model performance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The model still matters. But the enterprise behind the model matters more.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A powerful model on weak infrastructure will eventually disappoint the business. A capable model on strong infrastructure can deliver real value because it can be trusted, secured, scaled and improved.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is the shift CIOs need to lead.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The next AI bottleneck is not the model. It is whether the enterprise behind the model is ready.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Fedora Xfce or Xubuntu: Which is the best Linux desktop?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Xfce is a Linux desktop environment that is great at giving old machines new life. Two major distributions present this desktop differently. So, which is best?]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682959/it-nachrichten/fedora-xfce-or-xubuntu-which-is-the-best-linux-desktop/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682959/it-nachrichten/fedora-xfce-or-xubuntu-which-is-the-best-linux-desktop/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 10:03:23 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Xfce is a Linux desktop environment that is great at giving old machines new life. Two major distributions present this desktop differently. So, which is best?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Nuki Smart Lock Ultra: Das beste Türschloss mit Sonderrabatt]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Wenn die eigene Haus- oder Wohnungstür noch nicht smart ist, scheint jetzt der richtige Zeitpunkt zu sein, um zuzugreifen. Denn das beste Smart Lock ist derzeit reduziert zu haben, da das Nuki Smart Lock Ultra inklusive Universal-Zylinder wieder für unter 300 Euro zu bekommen ist. Um genau zu sei...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682915/ios-mac-os/nuki-smart-lock-ultra-das-beste-tuerschloss-mit-sonderrabatt/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682915/ios-mac-os/nuki-smart-lock-ultra-das-beste-tuerschloss-mit-sonderrabatt/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 09:25:22 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wenn die eigene Haus- oder Wohnungstür noch nicht smart ist, scheint jetzt der richtige Zeitpunkt zu sein, um zuzugreifen. Denn das beste Smart Lock ist derzeit reduziert zu haben, da das Nuki Smart Lock Ultra inklusive Universal-Zylinder wieder für unter 300 Euro zu bekommen ist. Um genau zu sein, zahlt ihr aktuell 299 Euro statt […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.appgefahren.de/nuki-smart-lock-ultra-das-beste-tuerschloss-mit-sonderrabatt-402624.html">Nuki Smart Lock Ultra: Das beste Türschloss mit Sonderrabatt</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.appgefahren.de/">appgefahren.de</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Studie belegt: Solaranlagen fallen bei Extremhitze fast komplett aus]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag Studie belegt: Solaranlagen fallen bei Extremhitze fast komplett aus erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Der Klimawandel gefährdet zunehmend die europäische Stromversorgung, da extre...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682622/it-security-nachrichten/studie-belegt-solaranlagen-fallen-bei-extremhitze-fast-komplett-aus/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682622/it-security-nachrichten/studie-belegt-solaranlagen-fallen-bei-extremhitze-fast-komplett-aus/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 05:53:20 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/21/solaranlagen-bei-hitze/">Studie belegt: Solaranlagen fallen bei Extremhitze fast komplett aus</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Der Klimawandel gefährdet zunehmend die europäische Stromversorgung, da extreme Sommertemperaturen nachhaltige Infrastruktur belasten. Eine neue wissenschaftliche Untersuchung zeigt, dass Solaranlagen bei Hitze massive Leistungseinbrüche von bis zu 90 Prozent erleiden können.  Ein Forscherteam der Universität Évora in Portugal hat die Auswirkungen extremer Hitzephasen auf Solaranlagen auf der Iberischen Halbinsel in den Jahren 2024 und 2025 […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/21/solaranlagen-bei-hitze/">Studie belegt: Solaranlagen fallen bei Extremhitze fast komplett aus</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Trainee (m/w/d) IT-Experte bei Universal Investment in Frankfurt - Absolventa]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[... IT-Service Management, Customer Services, IT-Porfoliomanagement und IT-Informationssicherheit/Cyber Security. Bringe Dich als Prozessberater, IT ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682410/it-security-nachrichten/trainee-mwd-it-experte-bei-universal-investment-in-frankfurt-absolventa/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682410/it-security-nachrichten/trainee-mwd-it-experte-bei-universal-investment-in-frankfurt-absolventa/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 01:54:18 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[... IT-Service Management, Customer Services, IT-Porfoliomanagement und IT-Informationssicherheit/<b>Cyber Security</b>. Bringe Dich als Prozessberater, IT ...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[New Orleans Cops Published Policy Document Allowing Weaponized Drones]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A draft New Orleans Police Department drone manual briefly published online would have allowed police drones to carry weapons with written approval from the superintendent, according to 404 Media. NOPD says the document was only an early draft and that its current policy (PDF) bans drones from ca...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682368/it-security-nachrichten/new-orleans-cops-published-policy-document-allowing-weaponized-drones/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682368/it-security-nachrichten/new-orleans-cops-published-policy-document-allowing-weaponized-drones/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 01:23:15 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A draft New Orleans Police Department drone manual briefly published online would have allowed police drones to carry weapons with written approval from the superintendent, according to 404 Media. NOPD says the document was only an early draft and that its current policy (PDF) bans drones from carrying weapons or hazardous materials. 404 Media reports: The current version, live as of July 1, has different language: "The sUAS shall not be equipped with weapons or hazardous materials of any kind," referring to small Unmanned Aerial Systems, or drones. According to the NOPD, the operations manual it published to the internet with the rules for weaponized drones was an early draft. "The manual published on July 1 is the current published version of the policy. Earlier versions were draft versions that were presented for review before adoption of the current policy," NOPD told 404 media. "NOPD has made it clear we are not and will not be equipping drones with weapons or other hazardous materials."
 
NOPD didn't answer follow-up questions about how or why the draft version of the manual was published. But the publication of a police drone manual that opens the door for weaponized quadcopters is important, and comes as drone companies and police flirt with the idea of putting weapons on their drones. New Orleans has long been a pioneer of camera and drone driven policing and the cops have used controversial tactics to get around public scrutiny and regulations. It shows that what the police are circulating amongst themselves and thinking about privately, what they perhaps want to happen, does not match public policy.<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=New+Orleans+Cops+Published+Policy+Document+Allowing+Weaponized+Drones%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fnews.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F20%2F2259204%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fnews.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F20%2F2259204%2Fnew-orleans-cops-published-policy-document-allowing-weaponized-drones%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://news.slashdot.org/story/26/07/20/2259204/new-orleans-cops-published-policy-document-allowing-weaponized-drones?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CIO 100 Leadership Live New York: CIOs push past AI pilots for measurable returns]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Technology executives from across the New York metropolitan area gathered July 16 at Convene, One Liberty Plaza, for CIO 100 Leadership Live New York, a full day of roundtables and panel discussions on enterprise AI investment, governance, and organizational change.



Several key areas of consen...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682348/it-security-nachrichten/cio-100-leadership-live-new-york-cios-push-past-ai-pilots-for-measurable-returns/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682348/it-security-nachrichten/cio-100-leadership-live-new-york-cios-push-past-ai-pilots-for-measurable-returns/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 01:07:24 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Technology executives from across the New York metropolitan area gathered July 16 at Convene, One Liberty Plaza, for <a href="https://event.foundryco.com/cio-100-leadership-live-new-york/">CIO 100 Leadership Live New York</a>, a full day of roundtables and panel discussions on enterprise AI investment, governance, and organizational change.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Several key areas of consensus emerged throughout this highly interactive event. Infrastructure fragmentation continues to block the path to securing returns on AI investments prompting leaders to understand rising cloud spend attributed to large language model utilization. This has caused a growing number of organizations to refocus on on-premises and hybrid options in C-suite and board-level capital planning conversations. Speakers, along with comments from the audience, described a shift from project thinking to product thinking, with smaller multidisciplinary teams moving faster than legacy structures.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Several participants repeatedly warned that automating broken processes just amplifies dysfunction. Governance and measurement remain unresolved, with usage metrics still getting mistaken for business value. One of the panels explored how CIOs may benefit from applying venture capital-style scrutiny to enterprise bets, weighing team execution as heavily as the technology itself. The throughline was a redefinition of the CIO role, from technology executor to business strategist fluent in revenue, board engagement, and transformation ownership.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Morning roundtable tackles AI infrastructure</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The day opened with an invitation-only executive breakfast roundtable, “Beyond the Pilot, Building the Infrastructure for Real AI Returns,” co-hosted by Unisys and Dell Technologies. Over a dozen executives representing major public and private sector organizations across the New York metropolitan area joined Steve Hollander, senior director of Americas global alliances at Dell Technologies, and Matt Marshall, CIO at Unisys for a workshop-style discussion.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The session explored the strategic, operational, financial, and technological issues that must be mastered to optimize infrastructure decisions and separate organizations that are experimenting with AI from those competing on it. Discussion questions probed how CIOs measure whether AI investment is translating into business results, how they can break the cycle of fragmented and siloed AI deployments, how boards are beginning to scrutinize seven-figure token spend and whether on-premises or hybrid infrastructure can rein in costs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The take-home point: the organizations pulling ahead are the ones that stopped treating AI as four separate problems, strategic, operational, financial, technological, owned by four separate functions, and started running it as one coordinated decision. Fragmentation is the actual cost center here, not the token spend itself. A CIO who solves the infrastructure question in isolation from the governance question, or the cost question in isolation from the talent question, ends up optimizing one silo while the other three keep bleeding value. Competing on AI, instead of just experimenting with it, means the finance, operations, technology and business sides are reasoning from the same picture of what’s being built and why, so the tradeoffs get made once, together, instead of getting re-litigated at every handoff.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Forum sessions open with a mandate for growth</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Following breakfast, the main forum program began with “The New CIO Mandate, Delivering Growth, Not Just Technology.” In a moderated conversation, Laksh Nathan, chief information officer at Paramount Skydance, drew on his experience with mergers, enterprise transformation and AI-enabled development to describe a shift from project and application management toward a product-centric operating model. Nathan addressed how smaller, multidisciplinary teams are changing expectations on both the business and technology sides of the enterprise, and what mindset changes CIOs must lead to turn AI into an engine of growth rather than a cost center.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">PwC followed with a session on “Designing the Intelligent Enterprise, From AI Investment to Evolving Operations.” Darren O’Meara, principal and chief technology officer for managed services, and Meghna Shah, principal for engineering and AI, examined why fragmented outcomes persist even after heavy investment in technology and transformation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The intelligent enterprise, they posited, is less about working toward achieving specific technology outcomes and more about creating operating models that integrate strategy, technology, operations, and governance into one system. This, they explained, requires linking AI, data, and decisions across the business and will leave an indelible mark on how decision rights are redesigned, funding models are developed, and accountability is enforced to accommodate the speed of the agentic economy.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Talent, tradeoffs, and the cost of getting it wrong</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The session “Return on Transformation: Time, Talent, and Tradeoffs” — with Prashant Hinge, chief information and transformation officer at MSIG USA; Joseph Gimigliano, chief technology officer at Northwell Health; and Eduard de Vries Sands, AI executive advisor at PatientPoint — examined why transformation initiatives so often lose their way.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The main culprit, even today in 2026, continues to revolve around a persistent instinct for technology implementations to become the objective rather than the means to a measurable business outcome. The panelists made the case for doing the incredibly difficult work of re-engineering (if not entirely re-imagining) existing processes before automating them and then placing smaller bets inside that bigger vision.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ricky Thakrar, head of sales and account management at Zoho, took the stage to present “Smaller, Smarter, Safer, The Enterprise AI Architecture Most Leaders Get Backwards,” arguing that constrained, context-rich architectures consistently outperform expensive models bolted onto fragmented systems.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A round of Hot Topic Discussion Groups and a networking lunch followed, including the Next CIO Luncheon featuring Robert Half Regional Director Jason Deneu.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Afternoon sessions turn to security, scale, and investment signals</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CSO and CIO Contributor Joan Goodchild moderated “Securing Trust in the Agentic Economy,” a discussion with Marlowe Cochran, CISO at the New York State Education Department, and Gee Rittenhouse, vice president of security services at AWS, on how organizations are balancing speed, innovation and security as AI agents move from experimentation into productization at scale.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Rittenhouse framed agentic risk as closer to human risk than traditional software risk, describing how an independent agent acting in a non-deterministic way really does look like a potential insider threat, pushing CISOs toward behavioral monitoring over static workload protection. He tied this to a structural shift in defense, noting it’s hard to do agentic security if you’re not observing it, putting observability at the center of agentic risk management.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cochran concurred, adding that many of the key tools that are needed to move into the agentic economy already exist, but must be implemented more aggressively, comprehensively and even more creatively. CISOs don’t need to invent an entirely new security discipline for the agentic era so much as extend identity management, access control and monitoring frameworks they already run to cover a new class of non-human actor — agents.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A session on “AI, From Experimentation to Enterprise Impact” brought together Meagan Gentry, national AI practice manager and distinguished technologist at Insight and Yuri Gubin, chief technology officer at DataArt, for a candid look at why pilots stall before reaching scaled production and what operating capabilities, governance, cost visibility, continuous education, must be in place to sustain AI once a proof of concept works.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">During the session’s Q&amp;A segment, a discussion emerged around how proof-of-concept success can result in a false signal, raising questions about whether pilots should be considered successful before the intended outcomes have had time to materialize, and drawing a distinction between measuring usage and adoption versus measuring business value.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The panelists explored how CIOs can identify the small number of transformational AI opportunities worth pursuing rather than managing hundreds of incremental use cases, and even challenged whether prioritization is the CIO’s job at all. The discussion closed on a sequencing question with real strategic weight, whether AI-first strategies are putting the technology ahead of the business problem CIOs are trying to solve, and what role CIOs should play with boards in defining the outcomes AI is expected to support.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A shift in perspectives</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The “Think Like a VC, Investment Shifts Towards Focused AI Applications” session featured three venture investors, Aaron Darr, partner at Lead Edge; Isabelle Phelps, partner at Lerer Hippeau; and Marshall Porter, general partner at AlleyCorp. The panel explored how investors evaluate risk and talent in a market where products and competitive positions can shift within months, and what separates a focused AI application with durable enterprise value from an AI wrapper built to chase a trend.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The panel challenged the enterprise instinct to seek certainty in a market moving this fast, questioning whether CIOs should stop looking for technologies that will future-proof the enterprise and instead grow more comfortable continuously reassessing their bets. Investors framed this as a deliberate departure from the traditional low-tolerance-for-failure posture that has long governed enterprise technology purchasing, arguing that the search for certainty has itself become a risk in a market where products and business models can shift within months. The discussion pressed CIOs to weigh how they can adopt a more dynamic investment mindset without compromising the enterprise security, governance and accountability their organizations still depend on.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A Lightning Insights followed, featuring five-minute briefings from Insight, Platform9 and Console, followed by Keystone Senior Principal Ellora Sarkar’s talk on why most enterprise AI investment fails to produce measurable value and what separates the small share of firms capturing real return on investment from the majority still stuck in pilots.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Closing the day</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The forum closed with “What’s Next for the CIO, Preparing for the Next 12 to 24 Months,” a fireside conversation with Leif Maiorini, CIO for corporate services at Omnicom. Maiorini discussed why business processes need to be redesigned for agentic speed rather than automated around existing human workflows, how organizational structures may shift as autonomous agents reshape visibility and decision support, and where sustainable differentiation will come from once AI capability itself becomes widely accessible.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Maiorini encouraged the industry to clearly distinguish between nondifferentiated services that should be made as efficient as possible and the differentiated capabilities that actually influence why customers choose to do business with an organization, once the major efficiency gains from optimization and AI have been captured.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">He was candid about the governance gap agentic systems open up, noting that agents lack the professional reputation, personal accountability and inherent constraints that shape human behavior, which creates new risk when autonomous decisions occur at machine speed. That combination, reinvesting efficiency gains into genuine differentiation while building governance models suited to non-human decision-makers, framed his closing case for why human creativity and judgment remain the enterprise’s most durable asset even as the underlying technology becomes commoditized.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong><em>Join the CIO 100 Awards &amp; Conference Aug 17–19, 2026 at Omni PGA Frisco Resort &amp; Spa, Frisco, TX — where top IT leaders celebrate innovation and connect.  <a href="https://event.foundryco.com/cio100-symposium-and-awards/?utm_medium=editorial&amp;utm_source=cio100_foundry_research&amp;utm_campaign=cio_100_research_foundry&amp;utm_term=4/8/2026-8/19//2026&amp;utm_content=editorial">Learn more to attend or partner</a>.</em></strong></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Automated Observability with Puppet in a Zero-Trust Environment (voxconf2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Building comprehensive infrastructure observability traditionally requires manual configuration of monitoring targets, brittle configuration management and endless YAML files. Every new server means updating Prometheus configs, managing certificates and hoping nothing breaks. What if your infrast...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682310/it-security-video/automated-observability-with-puppet-in-a-zero-trust-environment-voxconf2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682310/it-security-video/automated-observability-with-puppet-in-a-zero-trust-environment-voxconf2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 00:34:08 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Building comprehensive infrastructure observability traditionally requires manual configuration of monitoring targets, brittle configuration management and endless YAML files. Every new server means updating Prometheus configs, managing certificates and hoping nothing breaks. What if your infrastructure could monitor itself automatically from the moment a server boots?

This talk demonstrates a production-ready architecture that combines modern Puppet patterns with automated service discovery to create truly self-configuring observability. Using Puppet's exported resources, nodes automatically register themselves for monitoring without any manual intervention. New web servers are discovered and scraped within minutes of provisioning—no configuration updates required.

You'll learn how to implement:

 * Modern Puppet classification using CSR attributes instead of site.pp node definitions. Nodes self-classify by embedding their role directly in their TLS certificate, eliminating centralized configuration bottlenecks.
 * Hiera-based roles defined as pure YAML data instead of Puppet manifests, making roles accessible to non-Puppet experts and enabling templated role generation.
 * Automated service discovery through Puppet's exported resources. Each node exports its monitoring endpoints to PuppetDB, which a lightweight Python script queries to generate Prometheus file-based service discovery targets. Zero manual configuration required.
 * Zero-trust security using Caddy as an mTLS reverse proxy. All metrics traffic is secured with mutual TLS using Puppet's existing CA infrastructure—no additional certificate management needed.
 * Universal observability with node_exporter on every server and application-specific exporters (apache_exporter, etc.) automatically configured based on the node's role.

The architecture scales from a handful of servers to thousands, works seamlessly with cloud auto-scaling and provides complete visibility into both system and application metrics. Attendees will observe a demo with working code, container configurations and a deep understanding of how to build self-managing infrastructure that doesn't require operator intervention to stay observable.

https://corporate-gadfly.github.io/zero-trust-observability/#/title-slide
about this event: https://c3voc.de]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Automated Observability with Puppet in a Zero-Trust Environment (voxconf2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Building comprehensive infrastructure observability traditionally requires manual configuration of monitoring targets, brittle configuration management and endless YAML files. Every new server means updating Prometheus configs, managing certificates and hoping nothing breaks. What if your infrast...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682288/it-security-video/automated-observability-with-puppet-in-a-zero-trust-environment-voxconf2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682288/it-security-video/automated-observability-with-puppet-in-a-zero-trust-environment-voxconf2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 00:18:38 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Building comprehensive infrastructure observability traditionally requires manual configuration of monitoring targets, brittle configuration management and endless YAML files. Every new server means updating Prometheus configs, managing certificates and hoping nothing breaks. What if your infrastructure could monitor itself automatically from the moment a server boots?

This talk demonstrates a production-ready architecture that combines modern Puppet patterns with automated service discovery to create truly self-configuring observability. Using Puppet's exported resources, nodes automatically register themselves for monitoring without any manual intervention. New web servers are discovered and scraped within minutes of provisioning—no configuration updates required.

You'll learn how to implement:

 * Modern Puppet classification using CSR attributes instead of site.pp node definitions. Nodes self-classify by embedding their role directly in their TLS certificate, eliminating centralized configuration bottlenecks.
 * Hiera-based roles defined as pure YAML data instead of Puppet manifests, making roles accessible to non-Puppet experts and enabling templated role generation.
 * Automated service discovery through Puppet's exported resources. Each node exports its monitoring endpoints to PuppetDB, which a lightweight Python script queries to generate Prometheus file-based service discovery targets. Zero manual configuration required.
 * Zero-trust security using Caddy as an mTLS reverse proxy. All metrics traffic is secured with mutual TLS using Puppet's existing CA infrastructure—no additional certificate management needed.
 * Universal observability with node_exporter on every server and application-specific exporters (apache_exporter, etc.) automatically configured based on the node's role.

The architecture scales from a handful of servers to thousands, works seamlessly with cloud auto-scaling and provides complete visibility into both system and application metrics. Attendees will observe a demo with working code, container configurations and a deep understanding of how to build self-managing infrastructure that doesn't require operator intervention to stay observable.

https://corporate-gadfly.github.io/zero-trust-observability/#/title-slide
about this event: https://c3voc.de]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Ford’s $30,000 electric truck: all the news about the company’s big EV re-do]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The end of the Ford F-150 Lightning was also the start of a new era for the automaker. After failing to capture the market with the electric version of its popular F-Series truck, Ford is going back to the drawing board with its Universal Electric Vehicle Platform. The first offering will be a $3...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682047/it-nachrichten/fords-30000-electric-truck-all-the-news-about-the-companys-big-ev-re-do/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682047/it-nachrichten/fords-30000-electric-truck-all-the-news-about-the-companys-big-ev-re-do/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 21:31:29 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The end of the Ford F-150 Lightning was also the start of a new era for the automaker. After failing to capture the market with the electric version of its popular F-Series truck, Ford is going back to the drawing board with its Universal Electric Vehicle Platform. The first offering will be a $30,000 electric […]]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Hermes Agent v0.19.0 (2026.7.20) — The Quicksilver Release]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Hermes Agent v0.19.0 (v2026.7.20)
Release Date: July 20, 2026
Since v0.18.0: ~2,245 commits · ~1,065 merged PRs · ~2,465 files changed · ~300,000 insertions · ~36,000 deletions · ~3,300 issues closed · 450+ community contributors

The Quicksilver Release. Hermes is the messenger god, and this win...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681964/downloads/hermes-agent-v0190-2026720-the-quicksilver-release/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681964/downloads/hermes-agent-v0190-2026720-the-quicksilver-release/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 20:46:40 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾 Downloads</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Hermes Agent v0.19.0 (v2026.7.20)</h1>
<p><strong>Release Date:</strong> July 20, 2026<br>
<strong>Since v0.18.0:</strong> ~2,245 commits · ~1,065 merged PRs · ~2,465 files changed · ~300,000 insertions · ~36,000 deletions · <strong>~3,300 issues closed</strong> · <strong>450+ community contributors</strong></p>
<blockquote>
<p><strong>The Quicksilver Release.</strong> Hermes is the messenger god, and this window we made him move like it. First-turn time-to-first-token dropped <strong>~80% on every platform</strong>, reasoning streams live by default, the desktop app got a ~20-PR speed overhaul (14× faster streaming markdown, virtualized diffs, snappy session switching), and the TUI renders markdown incrementally. Around that speed spine: you can now <strong>manage your Nous subscription without leaving the terminal</strong>, plug <strong>Bitwarden and 1Password</strong> straight into Hermes, let <strong>smart approvals</strong> judge flagged commands for you by default, <strong>watch your subagents work live</strong>, and trust that a finished response <strong>survives a gateway crash</strong> thanks to a durable delivery ledger. This release also rolls up everything from the v0.18.1 and v0.18.2 infrastructure patch tags — those windows are fully documented here.</p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
<h2>✨ Highlights</h2>
<ul>
<li>
<p><strong>Hermes got dramatically faster — first token in a fraction of the time</strong> — Cold-start "Initializing agent..." used to eat ~4.3 seconds before your first turn even reached the model; it's now ~0.9s, an ~80% cut that applies to the CLI, gateway, TUI, desktop, and cron alike. Round 2 attacked what you <em>see</em> while waiting: reasoning models now stream their thinking live by default (no more staring at a spinner for 30 seconds), and the response box paints per token instead of per line. If Hermes ever felt like it took a deep breath before answering, that breath is gone. (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59332" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59332/hovercard">#59332</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59389" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59389/hovercard">#59389</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>The desktop app speed wave — 20+ targeted perf PRs</strong> — Long replies used to cost 14× more CPU in the markdown splitter than they do now; giant diffs froze the review pane until we virtualized it; switching sessions thrashes layout no more. Streaming no longer re-renders the sidebar and every tool row per token, profile backends pre-warm on hover intent, and boot-hidden panes mount at idle instead of on the cold-start critical path. The net effect: the desktop app feels like a native app under load, even with huge transcripts and busy agents. (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67154" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67154/hovercard">#67154</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67818" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67818/hovercard">#67818</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65898" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65898/hovercard">#65898</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66033" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66033/hovercard">#66033</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66747" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66747/hovercard">#66747</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67742" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67742/hovercard">#67742</a> and more — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/OutThisLife/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/OutThisLife">@OutThisLife</a>)</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Manage your Nous plan from the terminal — <code>/subscription</code> and <code>/topup</code></strong> — Changing your subscription used to mean a trip to the billing website. Now <code>/subscription</code> opens a full flow right in the TUI or classic CLI: see your plan and remaining allowance, preview exactly what an upgrade costs ("Pay $46.30 &amp; upgrade now") or when a downgrade takes effect, and apply it — with scheduled-change banners and undo. The desktop app got a matching billing settings tab. Your wallet never has to leave the keyboard. (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/51639" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/51639/hovercard">#51639</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61054" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61054/hovercard">#61054</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61067" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61067/hovercard">#61067</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/alt-glitch/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/alt-glitch">@alt-glitch</a>)</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Smart approvals are now the default</strong> — When Hermes wants to run a flagged command, an LLM reviewer now assesses it independently instead of asking you to approve every single one — and each verdict covers only that exact command, so a later command matching the same pattern gets its own review. Combined with the new <strong>user-defined deny rules</strong> (which block commands even under yolo mode) and <code>/deny &lt;reason&gt;</code> (which tells the agent <em>why</em> you refused so it course-corrects), day-to-day approval fatigue drops sharply without giving up control. (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62661" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62661/hovercard">#62661</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59164" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59164/hovercard">#59164</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/54518" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/54518/hovercard">#54518</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Plug your password manager into Hermes — Bitwarden &amp; 1Password secret sources</strong> — API keys no longer have to live in a plaintext <code>.env</code>. A new pluggable <code>SecretSource</code> interface lets Hermes fetch secrets from Bitwarden and 1Password (<code>op://</code> references) at load time, with multiple vaults enabled simultaneously, deterministic precedence, conflict warnings, and per-variable provenance. This consolidated eleven competing community PRs into one orchestrated interface — future vault providers drop in as plugins. (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59498" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59498/hovercard">#59498</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, 1Password provider salvaged from <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/hwrdprkns/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/hwrdprkns">@hwrdprkns</a>)</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Watch your subagents work — live transcripts + durable background delegation</strong> — <code>delegate_task</code> dispatches now return live transcript files you can <code>tail -f</code> the moment the subagents launch: every tool call, result, and streamed reply, one human-readable log per child. And background delegation completions are now <strong>durable</strong> — if the process restarts mid-run, results are restored and delivered through an ownership-checked ledger instead of vanishing. Fan out a fleet, watch any worker live, and never lose the results. (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67479" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67479/hovercard">#67479</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63494" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63494/hovercard">#63494</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>A finished answer can no longer be lost — the delivery-obligation ledger</strong> — If the gateway died between generating your response and confirming the platform actually delivered it, that answer used to be silently gone (and you'd paid for the turn). Final responses are now recorded in a durable ledger in <code>state.db</code> around the platform send and <strong>redelivered on the next boot</strong> — closing a P1 silent-loss window for Telegram, Discord, Slack, and every other channel. (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67181" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67181/hovercard">#67181</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>One gateway, many profiles — profile-based message routing</strong> — A single multiplexed gateway sharing one bot token can now route specific guilds, channels, or threads to different profiles — each with fully isolated config, skills, memory, and secrets. Point your work Discord server at the <code>work</code> profile and your hobby server at <code>personal</code>, from one bot. A second multiplex hardening wave means one misconfigured profile can no longer take down the whole gateway. (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64835" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64835/hovercard">#64835</a> salvaging <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Burgunthy/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Burgunthy">@Burgunthy</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65700" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65700/hovercard">#65700</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60589" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60589/hovercard">#60589</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/benbarclay/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/benbarclay">@benbarclay</a> + six salvaged contributors)</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>New providers and the newest frontier models</strong> — Fireworks AI and DeepInfra land as first-class providers (Fireworks with cost estimation and a <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="3370551446" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/2" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/2/hovercard" href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/2">#2</a> slot in the provider picker), Upstage Solar joins via salvage, and the model catalogs picked up <strong>GPT-5.6 (Sol/Terra/Luna + Pro variants, wired end-to-end across every route)</strong>, <strong>grok-4.5 (GA)</strong>, <strong>moonshotai/kimi-k3</strong>, <strong>claude-fable-5 / claude-sonnet-5</strong>, and GA <strong>tencent/hy3</strong> — plus LM Studio JIT model loading for local setups. (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62593" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62593/hovercard">#62593</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63969" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63969/hovercard">#63969</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61616" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61616/hovercard">#61616</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/kshitijk4poor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/kshitijk4poor">@kshitijk4poor</a> completing <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/rob-maron/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/rob-maron">@rob-maron</a>'s <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4848372503" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/61578" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61578/hovercard" href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61578">#61578</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60887" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60887/hovercard">#60887</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65913" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65913/hovercard">#65913</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64541" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64541/hovercard">#64541</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65472" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65472/hovercard">#65472</a>)</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Crank the thinking to max — new reasoning effort tiers and per-model control</strong> — Reasoning effort gained <code>max</code> and <code>ultra</code> levels (GPT-5.6 and Codex's top tiers), selectable everywhere from the CLI to the desktop, with sane clamping on providers with smaller scales. You can now also pin <strong>per-model reasoning-effort overrides</strong> in config, set <strong>per-slot effort in MoA presets</strong> (your advisors think hard, your synthesizer stays fast), and per-task effort for auxiliary models. Thinking depth is now a dial, not a global switch. (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62650" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62650/hovercard">#62650</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64458" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64458/hovercard">#64458</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64631" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64631/hovercard">#64631</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64597" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64597/hovercard">#64597</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Your sessions, your data — export everything</strong> — <code>hermes sessions export</code> now writes Markdown, Quarto, HTML, prompt-only, and even Hugging Face-ready trace formats, with the full filter surface (age, workspace, platform), an opt-in <code>--redact</code> secret-scrubbing pass, and compacted-session lineage stitched into one logical export. Pair with the new prune filters and bulk archive to keep your session store tidy. Your conversation history is a real dataset now, not a black box. (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60186" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60186/hovercard">#60186</a> salvaging <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/web3blind/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/web3blind">@web3blind</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60492" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60492/hovercard">#60492</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60507" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60507/hovercard">#60507</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59327" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59327/hovercard">#59327</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Security hardening round</strong> — This window closed a long list of credential-surface gaps: Vertex credentials scoped away from subprocess env and through profile secret scopes, media/vision/image-gen local-file reads routed through one shared credential-read guard, a webhook body-size-cap sweep across every aiohttp server, bot-token redaction in Telegram transport errors, Fireworks token prefixes added to the redactor, six P1 browser/MEDIA/.env hardening PRs salvaged in one pass, and CI hardened against untrusted-ref interpolation. (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57660" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57660/hovercard">#57660</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58709" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58709/hovercard">#58709</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59215" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59215/hovercard">#59215</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/56582" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/56582/hovercard">#56582</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57842" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57842/hovercard">#57842</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/srojk34/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/srojk34">@srojk34</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/kshitijk4poor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/kshitijk4poor">@kshitijk4poor</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/jquesnelle/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/jquesnelle">@jquesnelle</a>)</p>
</li>
</ul>
<hr>
<h2>⚡ Performance — the speed spine</h2>
<h3>First-turn latency (all platforms)</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>~80% TTFT cut</strong> — Discord capability detection off the critical path (token-keyed 24h disk cache + background refresh), Ollama probe skipped for known non-Ollama providers, agent-init blocking work removed; cold submit→dispatch ~4.3s → ~0.9s (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59332" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59332/hovercard">#59332</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li><strong>Perceived-latency round 2</strong> — <code>display.show_reasoning</code> default ON (watch the model think instead of a spinner), per-token response-box painting with width-aware force-flush, prompt-build caching, mtime-cached timezone resolution (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59389" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59389/hovercard">#59389</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Segment mixed tool batches to recover lost concurrency; drop per-call base64 re-serialization from request-size estimates (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64460" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64460/hovercard">#64460</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67788" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67788/hovercard">#67788</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/OutThisLife/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/OutThisLife">@OutThisLife</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h3>Desktop speed wave</h3>
<ul>
<li>14× less splitter CPU via incremental block lexing for streaming markdown; virtualized review-pane diffs (no more full-Shiki freeze); snappy session switching on large transcripts; killed the layout-thrash cascade on session switch (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67154" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67154/hovercard">#67154</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67818" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67818/hovercard">#67818</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65898" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65898/hovercard">#65898</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66033" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66033/hovercard">#66033</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/OutThisLife/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/OutThisLife">@OutThisLife</a>)</li>
<li>Cut startup serialization + per-turn REST amplification; pre-warm profile backends and gateway sockets on hover intent; idle-mount boot-hidden panes; fast model picker + dialogs (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66747" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66747/hovercard">#66747</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66347" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66347/hovercard">#66347</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67857" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67857/hovercard">#67857</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66470" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66470/hovercard">#66470</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/OutThisLife/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/OutThisLife">@OutThisLife</a>)</li>
<li>Stop per-token sidebar + tool-row re-renders during streaming; stop eager JSON.stringify of every tool's args/result; scope tool-diff subscriptions; batch sidebar session slices into one profile-DB pass; targeted file-tree revalidation; rAF-coalesced sash resizes (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67742" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67742/hovercard">#67742</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67842" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67842/hovercard">#67842</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67195" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67195/hovercard">#67195</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67245" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67245/hovercard">#67245</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67824" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67824/hovercard">#67824</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67838" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67838/hovercard">#67838</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67844" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67844/hovercard">#67844</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/OutThisLife/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/OutThisLife">@OutThisLife</a>)</li>
<li>Systematized perf benchmark harness with trustworthy cold-start + first-token measurement, replacing 12 one-off scripts (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67466" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67466/hovercard">#67466</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67697" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67697/hovercard">#67697</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/OutThisLife/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/OutThisLife">@OutThisLife</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h3>Everywhere else</h3>
<ul>
<li>TUI renders streamed markdown incrementally per block (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67236" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67236/hovercard">#67236</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/OutThisLife/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/OutThisLife">@OutThisLife</a>)</li>
<li>Skill discovery cached by scan signature; snapshot manifest builds ~5× faster; text prefilter before AST parse in tool discovery (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61414" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61414/hovercard">#61414</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61131" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61131/hovercard">#61131</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63941" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63941/hovercard">#63941</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/kshitijk4poor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/kshitijk4poor">@kshitijk4poor</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/ethernet8023/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/ethernet8023">@ethernet8023</a>)</li>
<li>Copy-on-write message prep instead of full deepcopy; model-metadata probe-cache cluster; gateway <code>session.resume</code> model + display history from one SELECT (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61133" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61133/hovercard">#61133</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61368" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61368/hovercard">#61368</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67247" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67247/hovercard">#67247</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/kshitijk4poor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/kshitijk4poor">@kshitijk4poor</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/OutThisLife/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/OutThisLife">@OutThisLife</a>)</li>
<li><code>hermes update</code> skips npm install when Node manifests are unchanged; dashboard session-list payloads trimmed + messages paginated (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61580" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61580/hovercard">#61580</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60883" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60883/hovercard">#60883</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/kshitijk4poor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/kshitijk4poor">@kshitijk4poor</a>)</li>
<li>Byte-stable gateway system prompts — pinned session-context render keeps the prompt cache alive across turns (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67403" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67403/hovercard">#67403</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/kshitijk4poor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/kshitijk4poor">@kshitijk4poor</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h2>🏗️ Core Agent &amp; Architecture</h2>
<h3>Providers &amp; models</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Fireworks AI provider</strong> with cost estimation + cached picker price columns, promoted to <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="3370551446" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/2" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/2/hovercard" href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/2">#2</a> in provider pickers (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62593" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62593/hovercard">#62593</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65476" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65476/hovercard">#65476</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65214" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65214/hovercard">#65214</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li><strong>DeepInfra</strong> hardened integration; <strong>Upstage Solar</strong> provider (<a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4614488518" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/42231" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/42231/hovercard" href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/42231">#42231</a> salvage) (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63969" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63969/hovercard">#63969</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64541" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64541/hovercard">#64541</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/kshitijk4poor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/kshitijk4poor">@kshitijk4poor</a>)</li>
<li><strong>GPT-5.6 (Sol/Terra/Luna + Pro) end-to-end</strong> — context lengths, native/Codex catalogs, pricing, compaction caps across every route (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61616" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61616/hovercard">#61616</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/kshitijk4poor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/kshitijk4poor">@kshitijk4poor</a>, building on <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/rob-maron/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/rob-maron">@rob-maron</a>)</li>
<li>grok-4.5 (GA) catalog + reasoning allowlist; kimi-k3 on Nous Portal + OpenRouter (kimi-k2.x retired) + K3 discovery on the Kimi Coding endpoint; claude-fable-5 / claude-sonnet-5 / fugu-ultra curated; GA tencent/hy3 (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60887" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60887/hovercard">#60887</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65913" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65913/hovercard">#65913</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65922" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65922/hovercard">#65922</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/56617" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/56617/hovercard">#56617</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60943" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60943/hovercard">#60943</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Catalog-labeled silent default (GLM-5.2) + bare-provider <code>/model</code> cost-safe routing; LM Studio JIT load mode; adaptive thinking for Kimi-family Anthropic endpoints (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64771" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64771/hovercard">#64771</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65472" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65472/hovercard">#65472</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67606" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67606/hovercard">#67606</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/kshitijk4poor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/kshitijk4poor">@kshitijk4poor</a>)</li>
<li>GLM-5.2 native reasoning_effort controls; Gemini request-context improvements; extra HTTP headers for LLM API calls; per-client model routing on the API server (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58884" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58884/hovercard">#58884</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61873" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61873/hovercard">#61873</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/vishal-dharm/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/vishal-dharm">@vishal-dharm</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57038" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57038/hovercard">#57038</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57028" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57028/hovercard">#57028</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li><strong>Claude Sonnet 5 fully wired</strong> — curated lists, intro pricing, and metadata across every route (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67932" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67932/hovercard">#67932</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li><strong>Hide providers you don't use</strong> — <code>enabled: false</code> per-provider flag + <code>excluded_providers</code> config scrub unwanted providers from <code>/model</code> pickers and built-in resolution (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67971" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67971/hovercard">#67971</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Bedrock catalog wave: real context-window probing from the live endpoint, 1M-context rows for current-gen Claude + Fable, geo-prefix parity, versioned profile-ID pricing, Opus 4.8/4.7 rows (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/68007" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/68007/hovercard">#68007</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67977" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67977/hovercard">#67977</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/68005" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/68005/hovercard">#68005</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67976" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67976/hovercard">#67976</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>kimi-k3 rollout completed across Kimi-direct catalog surfaces with 1M context on canonical Kimi Coding endpoints (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/68108" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/68108/hovercard">#68108</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Provider pickers: Qwen providers folded into one group row; collapsible provider groups in the desktop model picker; friendlier TUI model display grouping same-endpoint providers (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67758" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67758/hovercard">#67758</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67904" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67904/hovercard">#67904</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67908" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67908/hovercard">#67908</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h3>Reasoning &amp; MoA</h3>
<ul>
<li><code>max</code> + <code>ultra</code> effort levels across every surface and route (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62650" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62650/hovercard">#62650</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Per-model reasoning_effort overrides via a unified resolution chokepoint; per-task auxiliary effort; per-slot MoA preset effort; session-scoped <code>/reasoning</code> in the CLI (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64458" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64458/hovercard">#64458</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64597" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64597/hovercard">#64597</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64631" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64631/hovercard">#64631</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67946" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67946/hovercard">#67946</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>MoA: <code>reference_max_tokens</code> to cap advisor output and cut latency; per-preset fanout cadence (<code>user_turn</code> runs advisors once per user turn); stale presets surfaced without retries; half-filled preset saves rejected at the API boundary; aggregator resolves reasoning like an acting model (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/56756" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/56756/hovercard">#56756</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57591" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57591/hovercard">#57591</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64756" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64756/hovercard">#64756</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h3>Delegation, approvals &amp; the agent loop</h3>
<ul>
<li>Live subagent transcripts + durable background completions (see Highlights) (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67479" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67479/hovercard">#67479</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63494" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63494/hovercard">#63494</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Smart approvals default; user-defined deny rules (block even under yolo); <code>/deny &lt;reason&gt;</code> relays the denial reason; plugin <code>pre_tool_call</code> approve action escalates to a human gate (re-landed with rule keys) (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62661" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62661/hovercard">#62661</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59164" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59164/hovercard">#59164</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/54518" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/54518/hovercard">#54518</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60504" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60504/hovercard">#60504</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/kshitijk4poor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/kshitijk4poor">@kshitijk4poor</a>)</li>
<li>Unified delegation concurrency caps (<code>max_async_children</code> deprecated); explain long provider waits on the live status line; deterministic tool-output risk exposure (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/56955" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/56955/hovercard">#56955</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64775" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64775/hovercard">#64775</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61793" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61793/hovercard">#61793</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Codex: live TUI/desktop tool cards for the app-server runtime, commentary streamed as visible interim messages, compaction routed through <code>thread/compact/start</code>, max-output truncation recovery, oversized message ids dropped on replay, banked usage-limit resets via <code>/usage reset</code> (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66514" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66514/hovercard">#66514</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66115" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66115/hovercard">#66115</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60114" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60114/hovercard">#60114</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58155" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58155/hovercard">#58155</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62225" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62225/hovercard">#62225</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/kshitijk4poor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/kshitijk4poor">@kshitijk4poor</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/JoaoMarcos44/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/JoaoMarcos44">@JoaoMarcos44</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64280" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64280/hovercard">#64280</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Hooks: oversized hook-injected context spills to disk (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/20468" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/20468/hovercard">#20468</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Vibe reactions — floating hearts on affection across CLI/TUI/desktop, token-free core detection (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62016" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62016/hovercard">#62016</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/OutThisLife/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/OutThisLife">@OutThisLife</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h3>Secrets &amp; config</h3>
<ul>
<li>Pluggable <code>SecretSource</code> interface + Bitwarden &amp; 1Password providers (see Highlights) (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59498" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59498/hovercard">#59498</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/hwrdprkns/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/hwrdprkns">@hwrdprkns</a>)</li>
<li><code>hermes config get</code> / <code>unset</code>; warn on unknown root config keys + doctor deprecated-key reporting; <code>display.timestamp_format</code> (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65540" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65540/hovercard">#65540</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67370" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67370/hovercard">#67370</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/40622" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/40622/hovercard">#40622</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Auxiliary model usage recorded per task in session accounting; conversation-scoped Nous Portal usage tags across aux/MoA/delegate calls; <code>--usage-file</code> JSON report for <code>hermes -z</code> (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65537" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65537/hovercard">#65537</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65468" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65468/hovercard">#65468</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59615" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59615/hovercard">#59615</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h3>Sessions &amp; compression</h3>
<ul>
<li>Sessions export: Markdown/QMD/HTML/prompt-only/trace formats, HF upload, <code>--redact</code>, unified filters; full prune filter surface + bulk archive; CLI workspace filter + restore-cwd-on-resume (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60186" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60186/hovercard">#60186</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60492" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60492/hovercard">#60492</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60507" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60507/hovercard">#60507</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59327" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59327/hovercard">#59327</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63091" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63091/hovercard">#63091</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/web3blind/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/web3blind">@web3blind</a>)</li>
<li>Compression: preserve human intent and durable handoffs; retain prompt cache when memory is unchanged; flatten multimodal content for the summarizer keeping image handles; gateway compression routing integrity (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67275" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67275/hovercard">#67275</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67916" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67916/hovercard">#67916</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65046" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65046/hovercard">#65046</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/56868" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/56868/hovercard">#56868</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/kshitijk4poor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/kshitijk4poor">@kshitijk4poor</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Gateway session metadata consolidated into state.db; routing index moved to state.db (sessions.json now an optional legacy mirror); exact API bytes persisted in an <code>api_content</code> sidecar (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58899" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58899/hovercard">#58899</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59203" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59203/hovercard">#59203</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67274" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67274/hovercard">#67274</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/kshitijk4poor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/kshitijk4poor">@kshitijk4poor</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h2>🌐 Gateway, Fleet &amp; Relay</h2>
<ul>
<li><strong>Durable delivery-obligation ledger</strong> for final responses (see Highlights) (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67181" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67181/hovercard">#67181</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li><strong>Profile-based routing for inbound messages</strong> + multiplex hardening wave 2 + <code>GATEWAY_MULTIPLEX_PROFILES</code> override (see Highlights) (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64835" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64835/hovercard">#64835</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65700" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65700/hovercard">#65700</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60589" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60589/hovercard">#60589</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/benbarclay/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/benbarclay">@benbarclay</a> + salvaged contributors)</li>
<li>Per-session turn lease + conversation-scope funnel; unified session reset boundaries (reset sessions stay reset); truthful runtime readiness checks; per-channel model and system prompt overrides; per-session <code>/model</code> overrides persist across restarts (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67401" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67401/hovercard">#67401</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65783" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65783/hovercard">#65783</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62645" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62645/hovercard">#62645</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/56967" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/56967/hovercard">#56967</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57030" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57030/hovercard">#57030</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Session auto-reset default off; <code>/sessions search &lt;query&gt;</code>; webhook payload filters + route scripts; platform HTTP event callback routing; configurable long-running status phrases (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60194" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60194/hovercard">#60194</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57685" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57685/hovercard">#57685</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60944" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60944/hovercard">#60944</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65702" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65702/hovercard">#65702</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58872" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58872/hovercard">#58872</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Relay: generic OIDC client-credentials provisioning (NAS-free), routed profile carried from the connector wire source, channel context consumed from the connector; Nous auth forensics + <code>nous_session_valid</code> on <code>/api/status</code> for hosted self-heal; Docker re-seeds a terminally-dead Nous bootstrap session on boot (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60730" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60730/hovercard">#60730</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60586" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60586/hovercard">#60586</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64649" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64649/hovercard">#64649</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59976" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59976/hovercard">#59976</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59969" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59969/hovercard">#59969</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59983" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59983/hovercard">#59983</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/benbarclay/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/benbarclay">@benbarclay</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h2>📱 Messaging Platforms</h2>
<ul>
<li><strong>Inline choice pickers</strong> for <code>/reasoning</code> and <code>/fast</code> on Telegram, Discord, and Matrix — one-tap native buttons instead of typing (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65799" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65799/hovercard">#65799</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>WhatsApp: native Baileys polls (clarify renders as a poll), locations, rich inbound metadata; dashboard pairing flow (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58865" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58865/hovercard">#58865</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60571" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60571/hovercard">#60571</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Discord: recover messages missed during reconnect; auto-created threads renamed to generated session titles; configurable interactive view timeout; opt-in owner mentions on exec-approval prompts; optional admin-only gate for approval buttons (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66149" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66149/hovercard">#66149</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60187" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60187/hovercard">#60187</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60230" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60230/hovercard">#60230</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60493" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60493/hovercard">#60493</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/51751" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/51751/hovercard">#51751</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Slack: live per-tool status line (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67080" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67080/hovercard">#67080</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, salvaging <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4854171101" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/62007" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62007/hovercard" href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62007">#62007</a>)</li>
<li>Telegram: per-topic free-response allowlist; Google Chat clarify prompts rendered as cards (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65543" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65543/hovercard">#65543</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65546" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65546/hovercard">#65546</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Voice: <code>stt.echo_transcripts</code> toggle; MEDIA: captions attached to the media bubble on standalone sends; <code>display.tool_progress: log</code> option (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58859" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58859/hovercard">#58859</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61415" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61415/hovercard">#61415</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57014" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57014/hovercard">#57014</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/kshitijk4poor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/kshitijk4poor">@kshitijk4poor</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h2>🖥️ Hermes Desktop App</h2>
<ul>
<li><strong>Contribution-driven shell on a layout-tree model</strong> — panes, zones, and layouts as data; plugin-scoped i18n locale bundles followed (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60638" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60638/hovercard">#60638</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67303" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67303/hovercard">#67303</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/OutThisLife/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/OutThisLife">@OutThisLife</a>)</li>
<li><strong>Capabilities page</strong> — Skills/Tools/MCP + Hub in one place, with responsive overlay nav; CLI/dashboard parity for skills hub, MCP test/toggle/catalog, maintenance ops, log filters; five UX fixes from live testing (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57590" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57590/hovercard">#57590</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57441" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57441/hovercard">#57441</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67482" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67482/hovercard">#67482</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/OutThisLife/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/OutThisLife">@OutThisLife</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li><strong>Hermes Cloud connection mode</strong> (salvage of <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4773549207" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/55402" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/55402/hovercard" href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/55402">#55402</a>); soft gateway switch + gateway-settings polish; terminal execution backend picker with health probes (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61912" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61912/hovercard">#61912</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61916" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61916/hovercard">#61916</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67203" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67203/hovercard">#67203</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/OutThisLife/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/OutThisLife">@OutThisLife</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Keybind hint tooltips + keybinds settings tab + unified worktree dialog; base-branch picker for new worktrees; green unread dot for background-finished sessions; background-task sidebar indicators; grouped tool calls across text-less messages; auto-scrolling window for long tool-call runs (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65204" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65204/hovercard">#65204</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62243" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62243/hovercard">#62243</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65109" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65109/hovercard">#65109</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65174" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65174/hovercard">#65174</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61147" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61147/hovercard">#61147</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57913" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57913/hovercard">#57913</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/ethernet8023/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/ethernet8023">@ethernet8023</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/OutThisLife/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/OutThisLife">@OutThisLife</a>)</li>
<li>Session + project color system (inherit from project, per-session override, shared across sidebar/tabs); unified active-project identity in chat status; workspace path status action (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67469" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67469/hovercard">#67469</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67681" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67681/hovercard">#67681</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67282" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67282/hovercard">#67282</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63086" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63086/hovercard">#63086</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/OutThisLife/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/OutThisLife">@OutThisLife</a>)</li>
<li>Declarative memory-provider panel + full-config modal; config-defined TTS/STT providers + xAI TTS params; custom endpoint settings; per-job cron model picker; profile-aware approval mode control; UI scale setting; Ctrl/Cmd+wheel zoom; chat backdrop toggle; <code>/journey</code> opens the memory graph overlay (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67206" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67206/hovercard">#67206</a> salvaging <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/erosika/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/erosika">@erosika</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67209" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67209/hovercard">#67209</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67759" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67759/hovercard">#67759</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/austinpickett/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/austinpickett">@austinpickett</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67472" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67472/hovercard">#67472</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63520" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63520/hovercard">#63520</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60457" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60457/hovercard">#60457</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67029" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67029/hovercard">#67029</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64598" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64598/hovercard">#64598</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57267" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57267/hovercard">#57267</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/OutThisLife/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/OutThisLife">@OutThisLife</a>)</li>
<li>Full TypeScript conversion of the desktop tree (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57855" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57855/hovercard">#57855</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/ethernet8023/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/ethernet8023">@ethernet8023</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h2>📊 Web Dashboard</h2>
<ul>
<li>Memory provider switching; safe session import flow; WhatsApp pairing; Discord-specific toolsets editable from the web UI; clarified manual Telegram bot setup (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60569" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60569/hovercard">#60569</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63699" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63699/hovercard">#63699</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60571" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60571/hovercard">#60571</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65361" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65361/hovercard">#65361</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64636" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64636/hovercard">#64636</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/kshitijk4poor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/kshitijk4poor">@kshitijk4poor</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/shannonsands/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/shannonsands">@shannonsands</a>)</li>
<li>Terminal keep-alive + reattach for dashboard chat sessions; heavy turns isolated in a compute host; paste/drop images into Chat; <code>browser.headed</code> schema toggle; profile + gateway topology on <code>/api/status</code>; mobile/hosted OpenAI OAuth login (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60515" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60515/hovercard">#60515</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65895" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65895/hovercard">#65895</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61929" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61929/hovercard">#61929</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67046" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67046/hovercard">#67046</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60537" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60537/hovercard">#60537</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61330" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61330/hovercard">#61330</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/OutThisLife/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/OutThisLife">@OutThisLife</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/benbarclay/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/benbarclay">@benbarclay</a>)</li>
<li><code>hermes serve</code> is a true headless backend (no web UI build/mount) (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/55923" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/55923/hovercard">#55923</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/OutThisLife/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/OutThisLife">@OutThisLife</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h2>🧰 CLI &amp; TUI</h2>
<ul>
<li><code>/subscription</code> + <code>/topup</code> terminal billing (see Highlights) (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/51639" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/51639/hovercard">#51639</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/alt-glitch/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/alt-glitch">@alt-glitch</a>)</li>
<li><strong><code>/model --once</code></strong> — one-turn model override that reverts automatically (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67113" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67113/hovercard">#67113</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, salvaging <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4496326587" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/29923" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/29923/hovercard" href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/29923">#29923</a>)</li>
<li><strong>Stacked slash-skill invocations</strong> — <code>/skill-a /skill-b do XYZ</code> loads both skills in order (Claude Code port), with autocomplete + ghost text (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57987" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57987/hovercard">#57987</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58763" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58763/hovercard">#58763</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li><code>--safe-mode</code> troubleshooting flag; uninstall dry-run; TLS failures fail fast with fix hints; <code>/compact</code> alias + preview flags; pip/Homebrew installs warned unsupported (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/45300" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/45300/hovercard">#45300</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60111" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60111/hovercard">#60111</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57992" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57992/hovercard">#57992</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57029" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57029/hovercard">#57029</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57225" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57225/hovercard">#57225</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/ethernet8023/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/ethernet8023">@ethernet8023</a>)</li>
<li>TUI: model picker refresh support; custom skill bundles dispatched as agent turns; banner sizes skills display to terminal width (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59782" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59782/hovercard">#59782</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/helix4u/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/helix4u">@helix4u</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62859" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62859/hovercard">#62859</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Adolanium/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Adolanium">@Adolanium</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/40624" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/40624/hovercard">#40624</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Hermes Console REPL + perf follow-ups; <code>hermes curator usage</code> all-skills view; entry-point plugins surfaced in <code>hermes plugins list</code> (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57781" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57781/hovercard">#57781</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/kshitijk4poor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/kshitijk4poor">@kshitijk4poor</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/36727" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/36727/hovercard">#36727</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/40623" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/40623/hovercard">#40623</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h2>🔧 Tool System, Skills &amp; MCP</h2>
<ul>
<li>MCP: <code>mcp__server__tool</code> naming convention; server log notifications surfaced in agent.log; hosted OAuth completed across Dashboard + Desktop; configurable <code>redirect_uri</code>/<code>redirect_host</code> for proxied/WAF setups; OAuth callback port races closed; Blender added to the MCP catalog with a curated 4-tool default (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/52750" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/52750/hovercard">#52750</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57416" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57416/hovercard">#57416</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66151" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66151/hovercard">#66151</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65610" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65610/hovercard">#65610</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65622" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65622/hovercard">#65622</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64463" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64463/hovercard">#64463</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/benbarclay/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/benbarclay">@benbarclay</a>)</li>
<li>Skills: <code>security/unbroker</code> (autonomous data-broker removal) + blind opt-out hardening; <code>unreal-mcp</code> companion skill; blender-mcp reworked around the catalog entry; humanizer pattern expansion; <code>mcp-oauth-remote-gateway</code> optional skill (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57438" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57438/hovercard">#57438</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57902" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57902/hovercard">#57902</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65989" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65989/hovercard">#65989</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64715" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64715/hovercard">#64715</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/SHL0MS/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/SHL0MS">@SHL0MS</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65066" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65066/hovercard">#65066</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65486" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65486/hovercard">#65486</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Browser: full snapshots stored on truncation, eval denylist opt-in; computer_use follows cua-driver's verify→escalate ladder (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65923" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65923/hovercard">#65923</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67123" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67123/hovercard">#67123</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Kanban: modal create-task dialog + editable board project directory; Done-card results made obvious; grab-to-pan board scrolling; attachment toolset + CLI with SSRF-guarded URL fetch; project directory captured at board creation (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66333" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66333/hovercard">#66333</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63638" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63638/hovercard">#63638</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60226" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60226/hovercard">#60226</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65698" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65698/hovercard">#65698</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63249" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63249/hovercard">#63249</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Cron: durable execution audit history; one-shot stale-removal race fixed; run-claim TTL derived from HERMES_CRON_TIMEOUT (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61791" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61791/hovercard">#61791</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62014" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62014/hovercard">#62014</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/PRATHAMESH75/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/PRATHAMESH75">@PRATHAMESH75</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59567" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59567/hovercard">#59567</a>)</li>
<li>mem0: self-hosted dashboard backend + recall tuning + setup-wizard mode (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/56943" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/56943/hovercard">#56943</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60494" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60494/hovercard">#60494</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/kshitijk4poor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/kshitijk4poor">@kshitijk4poor</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Image gen: Codex image inputs; unsupported Codex image accounts classified; tool args recursively normalized by schema (cline port) (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57017" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57017/hovercard">#57017</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63627" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63627/hovercard">#63627</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/52220" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/52220/hovercard">#52220</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/kshitijk4poor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/kshitijk4poor">@kshitijk4poor</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h2>🔒 Security &amp; Reliability</h2>
<ul>
<li>Vertex: credential/project/region resolution through the profile secret scope; <code>VERTEX_CREDENTIALS_PATH</code>/<code>GOOGLE_APPLICATION_CREDENTIALS</code> stripped from subprocess env (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/56680" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/56680/hovercard">#56680</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/56582" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/56582/hovercard">#56582</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/srojk34/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/srojk34">@srojk34</a>)</li>
<li>Six P1 hardening PRs salvaged in one pass — browser guards, MEDIA anchoring, .env lockdown, delegate ACP transport (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57660" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57660/hovercard">#57660</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Media/vision/image-gen local-file reads routed through the shared credential-read guard; native image routing guarded by file-safety policy; unified image-source resolver + terminal-backend confinement (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58709" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58709/hovercard">#58709</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58752" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58752/hovercard">#58752</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57890" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57890/hovercard">#57890</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Webhook body-cap sweep: explicit <code>client_max_size</code> on 3 uncapped aiohttp servers + completion sweep; Raft chunked-request body limit; timestamp-bound V2 webhook signatures (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59180" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59180/hovercard">#59180</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59215" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59215/hovercard">#59215</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58902" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58902/hovercard">#58902</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58508" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58508/hovercard">#58508</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/srojk34/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/srojk34">@srojk34</a>)</li>
<li>Redaction: Fireworks token prefixes + Telegram transport errors; env-lookup false positives fixed for KEY=value and JSON/YAML config fields; bot tokens scrubbed from Telegram connect/send errors (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58501" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58501/hovercard">#58501</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58534" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58534/hovercard">#58534</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58915" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58915/hovercard">#58915</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58893" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58893/hovercard">#58893</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>computer-use: subprocess env sanitized across all five cua-driver spawn sites (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58889" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58889/hovercard">#58889</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59165" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59165/hovercard">#59165</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Dashboard: managed-files credential guard widened past .env + dir-tree gap closed; OAuth token TOCTOU closed with atomic 0o600 writes; stale dashboards can't recreate deleted profiles (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58222" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58222/hovercard">#58222</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/kshitijk4poor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/kshitijk4poor">@kshitijk4poor</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60236" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60236/hovercard">#60236</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/49435" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/49435/hovercard">#49435</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/LeonSGP43/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/LeonSGP43">@LeonSGP43</a>)</li>
<li>CI: untrusted refs passed through env, not <code>run:</code> interpolation; JS/TS tests wired into CI with source-regex tests banned; js-autofix pushes via PR instead of direct-to-main (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57842" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57842/hovercard">#57842</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/jquesnelle/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/jquesnelle">@jquesnelle</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60707" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60707/hovercard">#60707</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65186" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65186/hovercard">#65186</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/ethernet8023/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/ethernet8023">@ethernet8023</a>)</li>
<li>Docker: terminal network toggle with full-path coverage; Git Bash Mandatory-ASLR install failures detected; Windows updater console hidden during handoff (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59149" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59149/hovercard">#59149</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64651" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64651/hovercard">#64651</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66040" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66040/hovercard">#66040</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/helix4u/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/helix4u">@helix4u</a>)</li>
<li>Anthropic: request-local clients so the stale/interrupt watchdog never corrupts SQLite; per-profile OAuth file; OAuth login 429 fixed (UA must not be claude-code/) (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67238" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67238/hovercard">#67238</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/OutThisLife/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/OutThisLife">@OutThisLife</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59339" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59339/hovercard">#59339</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58178" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58178/hovercard">#58178</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Gateway/agent: tool_call_id deduplicated across pre-API sanitizers; background review inherits parent reasoning_config for Anthropic cache parity; <code>/new</code> memory extraction moved off the command path (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58350" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58350/hovercard">#58350</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64379" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64379/hovercard">#64379</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61139" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61139/hovercard">#61139</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/kshitijk4poor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/kshitijk4poor">@kshitijk4poor</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h2>🔁 Reverted in this window (for the record)</h2>
<ul>
<li>iron-proxy credential-injection egress firewall (<a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4499336733" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/30179" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/30179/hovercard" href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/30179">#30179</a> → reverted in <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58489" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58489/hovercard">#58489</a>) — not shipping in this release</li>
<li>dynamic-workflow orchestration skill (landed, then reverted) — not shipping</li>
<li>memory provider-actions extension point (landed, then reverted) — not shipping</li>
<li>Note: the plugin <code>pre_tool_call</code> approve escalation was reverted mid-window but <strong>re-landed</strong> in <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60504" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60504/hovercard">#60504</a> and ships in this release.</li>
</ul>
<h2>👥 Contributors</h2>
<p><strong>450+ people</strong> contributed to this release (via commits, co-author trailers, and salvaged PRs) — the biggest contributor window yet. Thank you, all of you.</p>
<h3>Core team</h3>
<ul>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a> — release lead; TTFT perf wave, delivery + delegation durability, smart approvals, SecretSource, gateway multiplex + profile routing, sessions export, security round, and a ~290-PR community salvage burn</li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/OutThisLife/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/OutThisLife">@OutThisLife</a> — desktop app (the speed wave, layout-tree shell, Capabilities page, session colors, vibe reactions, TUI incremental markdown, perf harness)</li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/kshitijk4poor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/kshitijk4poor">@kshitijk4poor</a> — GPT-5.6 end-to-end, DeepInfra + Upstage Solar providers, perf cluster, compression integrity, mem0, dashboard guards</li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/ethernet8023/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/ethernet8023">@ethernet8023</a> — CI overhaul (JS/TS tests wired in, autofix-via-PR, python speedups), desktop keybinds/worktrees/status indicators, full desktop TypeScript conversion</li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/benbarclay/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/benbarclay">@benbarclay</a> — relay OIDC provisioning, gateway multiplex override, Nous auth self-heal, hosted MCP OAuth groundwork</li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/alt-glitch/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/alt-glitch">@alt-glitch</a> — terminal billing (<code>/subscription</code>, <code>/topup</code>), desktop billing tab</li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/helix4u/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/helix4u">@helix4u</a> — desktop provider/model UX, TUI model picker refresh, Windows install/updater hardening</li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/austinpickett/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/austinpickett">@austinpickett</a> — desktop custom endpoint settings</li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/SHL0MS/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/SHL0MS">@SHL0MS</a> — unbroker + unreal-mcp skills, humanizer expansion</li>
</ul>
<h3>Top community contributors</h3>
<ul>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/srojk34/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/srojk34">@srojk34</a> — security hardening: Vertex credential/project/region scoping through the profile secret scope, subprocess env stripping, Raft chunked-request body limits</li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/HexLab98/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/HexLab98">@HexLab98</a> — 11 fixes across MCP capability gating, Windows installer PATH, desktop cron editing, gateway systemd warnings</li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/UnathiCodex/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/UnathiCodex">@UnathiCodex</a> — desktop stability: zoom across display moves, LaTeX rendering, resume-stall and runtime-readiness fixes</li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/xxxigm/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/xxxigm">@xxxigm</a> — <code>&lt;think&gt;</code> leak fix after thinking-only retry flush, dashboard auth/theme/PTY fixes</li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/erosika/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/erosika">@erosika</a> — desktop declarative memory-provider panel + honcho recall/timeout correctness</li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Frowtek/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Frowtek">@Frowtek</a> — credential security: master stores never mounted into skill sandboxes, live-transcript redaction, dashboard api_key precedence</li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/necoweb3/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/necoweb3">@necoweb3</a> — browser private-page CDP guard, cron one-shot liveness, gateway compression fail-closed</li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/DavidMetcalfe/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/DavidMetcalfe">@DavidMetcalfe</a> — desktop updater version pill, Local/custom endpoint exposure, sidebar collapse behavior</li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/shannonsands/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/shannonsands">@shannonsands</a> — dashboard: mobile channel setup, Discord toolsets from web UI, Telegram setup clarity</li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/vishal-dharm/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/vishal-dharm">@vishal-dharm</a> — Gemini request-context improvements</li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/PRATHAMESH75/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/PRATHAMESH75">@PRATHAMESH75</a> — cron one-shot stale-removal race, dashboard multiplex port-binding guard</li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/alelpoan/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/alelpoan">@alelpoan</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/embwl0x/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/embwl0x">@embwl0x</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Adolanium/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Adolanium">@Adolanium</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/giggling-ginger/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/giggling-ginger">@giggling-ginger</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Drexuxux/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Drexuxux">@Drexuxux</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/frizikk/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/frizikk">@frizikk</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/JoaoMarcos44/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/JoaoMarcos44">@JoaoMarcos44</a>, @wesleysimplici, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/LeonSGP43/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/LeonSGP43">@LeonSGP43</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/pierrenode/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/pierrenode">@pierrenode</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/simpolism/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/simpolism">@simpolism</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/MorAlekss/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/MorAlekss">@MorAlekss</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/r266-tech/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/r266-tech">@r266-tech</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/WadydX/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/WadydX">@WadydX</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/nv-kasikritc/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/nv-kasikritc">@nv-kasikritc</a> — targeted fixes across desktop, TUI, gateway, cron, webhook, nix, and browser surfaces</li>
<li>Salvaged-work authors whose PRs were cherry-picked with credit this window: <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Burgunthy/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Burgunthy">@Burgunthy</a> (profile routing), <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/web3blind/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/web3blind">@web3blind</a> (sessions export), <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/hwrdprkns/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/hwrdprkns">@hwrdprkns</a> (1Password), <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Christopher-Schulze/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Christopher-Schulze">@Christopher-Schulze</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Ahmett101/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Ahmett101">@Ahmett101</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/sjiangtao2024/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/sjiangtao2024">@sjiangtao2024</a>, and many more — see the salvage PR bodies for full attribution</li>
</ul>
<h3>All contributors</h3>
<p><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/0-CYBERDYNE-SYSTEMS-0/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/0-CYBERDYNE-SYSTEMS-0">@0-CYBERDYNE-SYSTEMS-0</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/0disoft/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/0disoft">@0disoft</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/0xbyt4/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/0xbyt4">@0xbyt4</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/100yenadmin/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/100yenadmin">@100yenadmin</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/17324393074/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/17324393074">@17324393074</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/2751738943/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/2751738943">@2751738943</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/8294/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/8294">@8294</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/abhibansal-sg/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/abhibansal-sg">@abhibansal-sg</a>,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/adambiggs/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/adambiggs">@adambiggs</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Adolanium/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Adolanium">@Adolanium</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/aeyeopsdev/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/aeyeopsdev">@aeyeopsdev</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/aguung/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/aguung">@aguung</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/AhmetArif0/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/AhmetArif0">@AhmetArif0</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Ahmett101/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Ahmett101">@Ahmett101</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/ai-ag2026/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/ai-ag2026">@ai-ag2026</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/AIalliAI/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/AIalliAI">@AIalliAI</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/ajzrva-sys/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/ajzrva-sys">@ajzrva-sys</a>,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/alastraz/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/alastraz">@alastraz</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/alelpoan/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/alelpoan">@alelpoan</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/alex-fireworks/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/alex-fireworks">@alex-fireworks</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/alex-heritier/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/alex-heritier">@alex-heritier</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/alex107ivanov/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/alex107ivanov">@alex107ivanov</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/AlexFucuson9/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/AlexFucuson9">@AlexFucuson9</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Alix-007/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Alix-007">@Alix-007</a>,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/allenliang2022/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/allenliang2022">@allenliang2022</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Almurat123/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Almurat123">@Almurat123</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/AlsayedHoota/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/AlsayedHoota">@AlsayedHoota</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/alt-glitch/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/alt-glitch">@alt-glitch</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/alvarosanchez/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/alvarosanchez">@alvarosanchez</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/amanning3390/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/amanning3390">@amanning3390</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/AmAzing129/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/AmAzing129">@AmAzing129</a>,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/AndreasHiltner/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/AndreasHiltner">@AndreasHiltner</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/andrewhomeyer/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/andrewhomeyer">@andrewhomeyer</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/annguyenNous/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/annguyenNous">@annguyenNous</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/ansel-f/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/ansel-f">@ansel-f</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/antydizajn/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/antydizajn">@antydizajn</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/arminanton/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/arminanton">@arminanton</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/arnispiekus/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/arnispiekus">@arnispiekus</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/asimons81/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/asimons81">@asimons81</a>,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/asscan/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/asscan">@asscan</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/ats3v/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/ats3v">@ats3v</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/austinlaw076/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/austinlaw076">@austinlaw076</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/austinpickett/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/austinpickett">@austinpickett</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/avifenesh/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/avifenesh">@avifenesh</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/aydnOktay/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/aydnOktay">@aydnOktay</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Bartok9/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Bartok9">@Bartok9</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/bautrey/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/bautrey">@bautrey</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/bbednarski9/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/bbednarski9">@bbednarski9</a>,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/bbopen/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/bbopen">@bbopen</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/benbarclay/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/benbarclay">@benbarclay</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/bigstar0920/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/bigstar0920">@bigstar0920</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/binhnt92/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/binhnt92">@binhnt92</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/bird/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/bird">@bird</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Black0Fox0/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Black0Fox0">@Black0Fox0</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/BlackishGreen33/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/BlackishGreen33">@BlackishGreen33</a>, @bo.fu, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/brendandebeasi/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/brendandebeasi">@brendandebeasi</a>,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/briandevans/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/briandevans">@briandevans</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/BROCCOLO1D/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/BROCCOLO1D">@BROCCOLO1D</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Bruce-anle/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Bruce-anle">@Bruce-anle</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/brunz-me/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/brunz-me">@brunz-me</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Burgunthy/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Burgunthy">@Burgunthy</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/bytesnail/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/bytesnail">@bytesnail</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/catbearlove1-lang/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/catbearlove1-lang">@catbearlove1-lang</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Cdddo/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Cdddo">@Cdddo</a>,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/cgarwood82/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/cgarwood82">@cgarwood82</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/CharmingGroot/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/CharmingGroot">@CharmingGroot</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/chouqin/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/chouqin">@chouqin</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Christopher-Schulze/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Christopher-Schulze">@Christopher-Schulze</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/claudlos/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/claudlos">@claudlos</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/CocaKova/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/CocaKova">@CocaKova</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Code-suphub/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Code-suphub">@Code-suphub</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/CodeForgeNet/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/CodeForgeNet">@CodeForgeNet</a>,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/craigdfrench/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/craigdfrench">@craigdfrench</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/CrazyBoyM/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/CrazyBoyM">@CrazyBoyM</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/crazywriter1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/crazywriter1">@crazywriter1</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/cresslank/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/cresslank">@cresslank</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/cruzanstx/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/cruzanstx">@cruzanstx</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/cyrkstudios/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/cyrkstudios">@cyrkstudios</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/danilofalcao/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/danilofalcao">@danilofalcao</a>,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/datachainsystems/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/datachainsystems">@datachainsystems</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/DatTheMaster/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/DatTheMaster">@DatTheMaster</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/davidb73-hub/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/davidb73-hub">@davidb73-hub</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/davidgut1982/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/davidgut1982">@davidgut1982</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/DavidMetcalfe/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/DavidMetcalfe">@DavidMetcalfe</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/davidrobertson/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/davidrobertson">@davidrobertson</a>,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/deacon-botdoctor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/deacon-botdoctor">@deacon-botdoctor</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/DECK6/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/DECK6">@DECK6</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/deepujain/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/deepujain">@deepujain</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/derek2000139/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/derek2000139">@derek2000139</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/designnotdrum/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/designnotdrum">@designnotdrum</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/deusyu/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/deusyu">@deusyu</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/devatnull/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/devatnull">@devatnull</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/devorun/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/devorun">@devorun</a>,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/dexhunter/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/dexhunter">@dexhunter</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/dfein38347g/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/dfein38347g">@dfein38347g</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Dhravya/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Dhravya">@Dhravya</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/DictatorBacon/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/DictatorBacon">@DictatorBacon</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/digitalbase/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/digitalbase">@digitalbase</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/dlkakbs/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/dlkakbs">@dlkakbs</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/dmabry/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/dmabry">@dmabry</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/DNAlec/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/DNAlec">@DNAlec</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/dodo-reach/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/dodo-reach">@dodo-reach</a>,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/doncazper/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/doncazper">@doncazper</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/dorokuma/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/dorokuma">@dorokuma</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/doxe0x/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/doxe0x">@doxe0x</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Drexuxux/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Drexuxux">@Drexuxux</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/dschnurbusch/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/dschnurbusch">@dschnurbusch</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Dusk1e/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Dusk1e">@Dusk1e</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/EdderTalmor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/EdderTalmor">@EdderTalmor</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/egilewski/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/egilewski">@egilewski</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/elashera/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/elashera">@elashera</a>,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Elektrofussel/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Elektrofussel">@Elektrofussel</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/eliteworkstation94-ai/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/eliteworkstation94-ai">@eliteworkstation94-ai</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/embwl0x/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/embwl0x">@embwl0x</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/emo-eth/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/emo-eth">@emo-eth</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/emozilla/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/emozilla">@emozilla</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/enzo-adami/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/enzo-adami">@enzo-adami</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Epoxidex/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Epoxidex">@Epoxidex</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/ErnestHysa/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/ErnestHysa">@ErnestHysa</a>,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/erosika/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/erosika">@erosika</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/esthonjr/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/esthonjr">@esthonjr</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/ethernet8023/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/ethernet8023">@ethernet8023</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/evefromwayback/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/evefromwayback">@evefromwayback</a>, @evelynburger, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/F4TB0Yz/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/F4TB0Yz">@F4TB0Yz</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/falkoro/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/falkoro">@falkoro</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/fanyangCS/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/fanyangCS">@fanyangCS</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="organization" data-hovercard-url="/orgs/firefly/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/firefly">@firefly</a>,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/fjlaowan1983/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/fjlaowan1983">@fjlaowan1983</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/flewe/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/flewe">@flewe</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/flo1t/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/flo1t">@flo1t</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/flow-digital-ny/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/flow-digital-ny">@flow-digital-ny</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/floze-the-genius/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/floze-the-genius">@floze-the-genius</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/frizikk/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/frizikk">@frizikk</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Frowtek/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Frowtek">@Frowtek</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/FuryMartin/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/FuryMartin">@FuryMartin</a>,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/fyzanshaik/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/fyzanshaik">@fyzanshaik</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/gauravsaxena1997/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/gauravsaxena1997">@gauravsaxena1997</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/geoffreybutler94/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/geoffreybutler94">@geoffreybutler94</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/georgedrury/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/georgedrury">@georgedrury</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/gigakun3030/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/gigakun3030">@gigakun3030</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/giggling-ginger/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/giggling-ginger">@giggling-ginger</a>,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Git-on-my-level/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Git-on-my-level">@Git-on-my-level</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/gitcommit90/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/gitcommit90">@gitcommit90</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/githubespresso407/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/githubespresso407">@githubespresso407</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/gnodet/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/gnodet">@gnodet</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/GottZ/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/GottZ">@GottZ</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Gridzilla/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Gridzilla">@Gridzilla</a>, @grimmjoww578, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/gumclaw/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/gumclaw">@gumclaw</a>,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Gutslabs/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Gutslabs">@Gutslabs</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/HaiderSultanArc/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/HaiderSultanArc">@HaiderSultanArc</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/harjothkhara/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/harjothkhara">@harjothkhara</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/heathley/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/heathley">@heathley</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/hejuntt1014/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/hejuntt1014">@hejuntt1014</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/helix4u/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/helix4u">@helix4u</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/HeLLGURD/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/HeLLGURD">@HeLLGURD</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/hellno/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/hellno">@hellno</a>,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/herbalizer404/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/herbalizer404">@herbalizer404</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/HexLab98/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/HexLab98">@HexLab98</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/hmirin/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/hmirin">@hmirin</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Hopfensaft/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Hopfensaft">@Hopfensaft</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Hotragn/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Hotragn">@Hotragn</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/hsy5571616/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/hsy5571616">@hsy5571616</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/huanshan5195/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/huanshan5195">@huanshan5195</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/HumphreySun98/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/HumphreySun98">@HumphreySun98</a>,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/hwrdprkns/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/hwrdprkns">@hwrdprkns</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/hydracoco7/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/hydracoco7">@hydracoco7</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/hydraxman/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/hydraxman">@hydraxman</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/iamlukethedev/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/iamlukethedev">@iamlukethedev</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/iborazzi/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/iborazzi">@iborazzi</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/IgorGanapolsky/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/IgorGanapolsky">@IgorGanapolsky</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/iizotov/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/iizotov">@iizotov</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/ildunari/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/ildunari">@ildunari</a>,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/infinitycrew39/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/infinitycrew39">@infinitycrew39</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/IpastorSan/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/IpastorSan">@IpastorSan</a>, @irresi, @isfttr, @isheng-eqi, @itsflownium, @izumi0uu, @Jaaneek, @JacketPants,<br>
@jaisup, @jakelongvu-bot, @jakepresent, @jaketracey, @JAlmanzarMint, @JasonFang1993, @jbbottoms, @jcjc81,<br>
@JiaDe-Wu, @Jiahui-Gu, @Jigoooo, @jingsong-liu, @jneeee, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/JoaoMarcos44/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/JoaoMarcos44">@JoaoMarcos44</a>, @joelbrilliant, @John-Lussier, @jplew,<br>
@jtstothard, @juniperbevensee, @Jupiter363, @justinschille, @k4z4n0v4, @kaishi00, @karfly, @kartik-mem0,<br>
@kavioavio, @KCAYAAI, @kenyonxu, @keslerm, @kevinrajaram, @knoal, @kocaemre, @kohoj, @konsisumer, @krowd3v,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/kshitijk4poor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/kshitijk4poor">@kshitijk4poor</a>, @kuangmi-bit, @kubolko, @kyssta-exe, @Kyzcreig, @l0h1nth, @labsobsidian, @laurinaitis,<br>
@LavyaTandel, @lawyer112, @lemonwan, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/LeonSGP43/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/LeonSGP43">@LeonSGP43</a>, @lEWFkRAD, @linfeng961, @liuhao1024, @liuwei666888, @ljy-2000,<br>
@loes5050, @logical-and, @LoicHmh, @loongfay, @lord-dubious, @lost9999, @lucasfdale, @lucaskvasirr,<br>
@luxuguang-leo, @ly-wang19, @m0n5t3r, @m1qaweb, @M1racleShih, @MaartenDMT, @mahdiwafy, @MaheshBhushan,<br>
@ManniBr, @marcelohildebrand, @marcolivierlavoie, @markoub, @MarkVLK, @Marxb85, @matantsevs,<br>
@maxpetrusenkoagent, @mbac, @mdc2122, @mguttmann, @Mibayy, @michaelHMK, @mijanx, @minchang, @momomojo,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/MorAlekss/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/MorAlekss">@MorAlekss</a>, @morluto, @msh01, @mssteuer, @mvanhorn, @nanami7777777, @nankingjing, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/necoweb3/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/necoweb3">@necoweb3</a>, @neo-claw-bot,<br>
@neoguyverx, @nicha16, @nikshepsvn, @nima20002000, @nnnet, @NousResearch, @nullptr0807, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/nv-kasikritc/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/nv-kasikritc">@nv-kasikritc</a>,<br>
@okisdev, @OmarB97, @ooiuuii, @ooovenenoso, @oppih, @Osraka, @ostravajih, @otsune, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/OutThisLife/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/OutThisLife">@OutThisLife</a>, @OYLFLMH,<br>
@patrick-muller, @pdmartins, @pedrommaiaa, @Peterskaronis, @petrichor-op, @pgregg88, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/pierrenode/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/pierrenode">@pierrenode</a>, @pixel4039,<br>
@plcunha, @pnascimento9596, @Polyhistor, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/PRATHAMESH75/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/PRATHAMESH75">@PRATHAMESH75</a>, @professorpalmer, @Punyko8, @Que0x, @Qwinty,<br>
@r0gersm1th, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/r266-tech/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/r266-tech">@r266-tech</a>, @rabadaki, @ragingbulld, @RainbowAndSun, @rainbowgore, @randimt, @rarf, @rasitakyol,<br>
@rayjun, @raymondyan-zhijie, @re-ITRT, @RenoMG, @Rival, @RKelln, @rlaehddus302, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/rob-maron/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/rob-maron">@rob-maron</a>, @rodboev,<br>
@roryford, @rungmc357, @ruslanvasylev, @s0xn1ck, @s905060, @s96919, @sahibzada-allahyar, @sahil-shubham,<br>
@Sahil-SS9, @SahilRakhaiya05, @sam7894604, @SAMBAS123, @samrusani, @sanidhyasin, @sasquatch9818, @sberan,<br>
@ScotterMonk, @seagpt, @sebastianlutycz, @SemonCat, @setclock, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/shannonsands/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/shannonsands">@shannonsands</a>, @sharziki, @shashwatgokhe,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/SHL0MS/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/SHL0MS">@SHL0MS</a>, @shuangxinniao, @SilentKnight87, @simplast, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/simpolism/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/simpolism">@simpolism</a>, @SiteupAgencia, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/sjiangtao2024/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/sjiangtao2024">@sjiangtao2024</a>, @sk-holmes,<br>
@slow4cyl, @smtony, @soddy022, @Soju06, @solyanviktor-star, @SongotenU, @spiky02plateau, @sprmn24, @SquabbyZ,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/srojk34/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/srojk34">@srojk34</a>, @ssiweifnag, @stantheman0128, @StellarisW, @stephenschoettler, @suninrain086, @superposition,<br>
@Supersynergy, @sweetcornna, @szafranski, @tanmayxchoudhary, @tarunravi, @tcconnally, @terry197913, @Thatgfsj,<br>
@thegoodguysla, @thestudionorth, @TheTom, @TinkerOfThings, @tjboudreaux, @tjp2021, @Tortugasaur, @Tosko4,<br>
@Tranquil-Flow, @trevorgordon981, @trismegistus-wanderer, @tt-a1i, @tuancookiez-hub, @TurgutKural, @Umi4Life,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/UnathiCodex/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/UnathiCodex">@UnathiCodex</a>, @unsupportedpastels, @uzaylisak, @valda, @vampyren, @veradim, @victor-kyriazakos, @virtualex-itv,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/vishal-dharm/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/vishal-dharm">@vishal-dharm</a>, @Vissirexa, @vizi0uz, @vkkong, @vKongv, @VolodymyrBg, @vortexopenclaw, @VrtxOmega, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/WadydX/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/WadydX">@WadydX</a>,<br>
@waroffchange, @waseemshahwan, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/web3blind/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/web3blind">@web3blind</a>, @webtecnica, @wesleion, @wesleysimplicio, @williamumu,<br>
@WilsonKinyua, @wxy-nlp, @wyuebei-cloud, @x7peeps, @x9x9x9x9x9x91, @xuezhaolan, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/xxxigm/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/xxxigm">@xxxigm</a>, @ya-nsh, @yatesjalex,<br>
@ygd58, @yingliang-zhang, @yinkev, @YLChen-007, @yu-xin-c, @yungchentang, @zapabob, @zccyman, @zeapsu,<br>
@ziliangpeng, @zwcf5200, @zzpigpinggai</p>
<p>Also: bo.fu, Paulo Henrique, kyssta-exe 25470058+kyssta-exe.fu, Paulo Henrique, kyssta-exe 25470058+kyssta-exe.</p>
<hr>
<p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/compare/v2026.7.1...v2026.7.20">v2026.7.1...v2026.7.20</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Das sind die besten Internetanbieter in Deutschland]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag Das sind die besten Internetanbieter in Deutschland erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Viele Verträge schließen wir nebenbei ab und vergessen dann, dass sie überhaupt existieren. Da...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681940/it-security-nachrichten/das-sind-die-besten-internetanbieter-in-deutschland/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681940/it-security-nachrichten/das-sind-die-besten-internetanbieter-in-deutschland/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 20:22:01 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/20/besten-internetanbieter-in-deutschland/">Das sind die besten Internetanbieter in Deutschland</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Viele Verträge schließen wir nebenbei ab und vergessen dann, dass sie überhaupt existieren. Das trifft vor allem auf Internetanbieter zu, die von vielen Menschen nie gewechselt werden. Dabei lohnt sich ein genauer Blick, denn zwischen den Unternehmen gibt es große Unterschiede. Streaming, Homeoffice, Videocalls oder Online-Shopping: Ohne stabile Internetleitung steht das Leben häufig still. Der […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/20/besten-internetanbieter-in-deutschland/">Das sind die besten Internetanbieter in Deutschland</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Welcome to the age of extreme job anxiety | Zoe Williams]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Young, old, midlife – whatever your age, gender or sector, the unemployment crisis is hitting us all. The only way through it is togetherThe personal experience of long-term unemployment is one people rarely share, for completely understandable reasons. There’s a bit of superstition that saying i...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681663/ai-nachrichten/welcome-to-the-age-of-extreme-job-anxiety-zoe-williams/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681663/ai-nachrichten/welcome-to-the-age-of-extreme-job-anxiety-zoe-williams/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 18:53:47 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Young, old, midlife – whatever your age, gender or sector, the unemployment crisis is hitting us all. The only way through it is together</p><p>The personal experience of long-term unemployment is one people rarely share, for completely understandable reasons. There’s a bit of superstition that saying it out loud will bed it in, and there’s always one person in 100 who will choose to explain away the misfortune as your own personal failing.</p><p>Even if they’re clearly in the grip of superstitions of their own – trying to ward off your fate for themselves – it’s hard not to take criticism personally in such a personal situation. The conventions of human interaction are that you shouldn’t really mention a cloud unless you have a silver lining handy. For instance: after the financial crash in 2008, I remember hearing a couple interviewed on the radio who had both been made redundant when the private school they worked for closed down. After describing months of fruitless job applications, the wife ended saying they’d been able to spend much more time in their allotment, and she reckoned their rocket yield alone had saved them a small fortune. That, I thought, is a remarkable and yet probably universal commitment to looking on the bright side.</p> <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/jul/20/welcome-to-the-age-of-extreme-job-anxiety">Continue reading...</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Kupferfolie als Lithium-Falle: Forscher entschlüsseln Batterie-Leistungsabfall]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag Kupferfolie als Lithium-Falle: Forscher entschlüsseln Batterie-Leistungsabfall erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Weltweit nimmt die Zulassung von Elektrofahrzeugen weiter zu. Doch ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681640/it-nachrichten/kupferfolie-als-lithium-falle-forscher-entschluesseln-batterie-leistungsabfall/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681640/it-nachrichten/kupferfolie-als-lithium-falle-forscher-entschluesseln-batterie-leistungsabfall/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 18:50:30 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/20/leistungsabfall-von-batterien/">Kupferfolie als Lithium-Falle: Forscher entschlüsseln Batterie-Leistungsabfall</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Weltweit nimmt die Zulassung von Elektrofahrzeugen weiter zu. Doch die Alterung der darin verbauten Akkus stellt die Industrie vor Herausforderungen. Ein internationales Forscherteam hat nun auf atomarer Ebene entschlüsselt, warum es zum Leistungsabfall von Batterien kommt. Dabei rückt ein Bauteil in den Fokus, das bislang als passives galt.  Im Juni 2026 waren Elektroautos in Deutschland […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/20/leistungsabfall-von-batterien/">Kupferfolie als Lithium-Falle: Forscher entschlüsseln Batterie-Leistungsabfall</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[LG’s glossy OLED gaming monitor is rare to find under $400]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[If you’ve been thinking about upgrading your gaming monitor, LG’s 27-inch 27GX704A-B pairs a glossy WOLED panel with a fast refresh rate, and it’s currently on sale for $379.99 (about $70 off) at Amazon and directly from LG, marking a new low price. It originally launched at $799.99, but has been...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681627/it-nachrichten/lgs-glossy-oled-gaming-monitor-is-rare-to-find-under-400/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681627/it-nachrichten/lgs-glossy-oled-gaming-monitor-is-rare-to-find-under-400/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 18:50:08 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If you’ve been thinking about upgrading your gaming monitor, LG’s 27-inch 27GX704A-B pairs a glossy WOLED panel with a fast refresh rate, and it’s currently on sale for $379.99 (about $70 off) at Amazon and directly from LG, marking a new low price. It originally launched at $799.99, but has been available for under $500 since […]]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[v1.18.4]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Core
Improvements

Use adaptive thinking controls for Kimi models on Anthropic-compatible providers, with summarized reasoning output by default. (@chouqin)

Bugfixes

Reduce OpenAI provider header timeouts during slow connection setup.
Respect provider-defined reasoning options instead of fallin...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681569/downloads/v1184/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681569/downloads/v1184/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 17:47:33 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾 Downloads</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>Core</h2>
<h3>Improvements</h3>
<ul>
<li>Use adaptive thinking controls for Kimi models on Anthropic-compatible providers, with summarized reasoning output by default. (<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/chouqin/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/chouqin">@chouqin</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h3>Bugfixes</h3>
<ul>
<li>Reduce OpenAI provider header timeouts during slow connection setup.</li>
<li>Respect provider-defined reasoning options instead of falling back to the wrong reasoning controls.</li>
<li>Restore Azure Cognitive Services endpoint support for Azure-hosted models.</li>
</ul>
<h2>Desktop</h2>
<h3>Improvements</h3>
<ul>
<li>Sync the embedded terminal theme with the app theme.</li>
<li>Improve the review panel so open file tabs can stay aligned with the current diff view.</li>
<li>Rewrite the v2 prompt input for more reliable command, context, shell, attachment, and history interactions.</li>
<li>Improve review panel resizing and sticky controls.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Bugfixes</h3>
<ul>
<li>Preserve command drafts in the command menu.</li>
<li>Avoid session view failures when message parent links are missing.</li>
<li>Prevent sending empty prompt text parts.</li>
<li>Restore model variant selection accessibility.</li>
<li>Show keybind tooltips on prompt input controls. (<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/ProdigyRahul/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/ProdigyRahul">@ProdigyRahul</a>)</li>
<li>Deduplicate repeated file entries in diff summaries.</li>
<li>Prevent recovery window handling from touching destroyed windows.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Thank you to 3 community contributors:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/jerome-benoit/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/jerome-benoit">@jerome-benoit</a>:
<ul>
<li>fix(nix): relax Bun version check for desktop build (<a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4877704946" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/issues/36767" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/anomalyco/opencode/pull/36767/hovercard" href="https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/pull/36767">#36767</a>)</li>
<li>fix(nix): restore desktop integration (<a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4897416572" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/issues/37197" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/anomalyco/opencode/pull/37197/hovercard" href="https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/pull/37197">#37197</a>)</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/ProdigyRahul/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/ProdigyRahul">@ProdigyRahul</a>:
<ul>
<li>fix(app): show keybind tooltips on prompt input controls (<a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4924806992" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/issues/37824" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/anomalyco/opencode/pull/37824/hovercard" href="https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/pull/37824">#37824</a>)</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/chouqin/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/chouqin">@chouqin</a>:
<ul>
<li>feat(opencode): use adaptive thinking effort for kimi family on anthr… (<a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4920812833" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/issues/37696" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/anomalyco/opencode/pull/37696/hovercard" href="https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/pull/37696">#37696</a>)</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple could ‘run the table’ on AI if it does things right]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Looking ahead just a short time, Apple could hold a powerful position in AI where it most makes sense: deployment.



Not only will the company offer up its own AI models for the kind of tasks millions use ChatGPT to do today, but it will provide more sophisticated on-device agentic models to hel...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681267/it-nachrichten/apple-could-run-the-table-on-ai-if-it-does-things-right/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681267/it-nachrichten/apple-could-run-the-table-on-ai-if-it-does-things-right/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 15:33:26 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Looking ahead just a short time, Apple could hold a powerful position in AI where it most makes sense: deployment.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Not only will the company offer up its own AI models for the kind of tasks millions use ChatGPT to do today, but it will provide more sophisticated on-device agentic models to help users get things done through Siri AI.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Apple also <a href="https://www.macobserver.com/news/apple-calls-its-new-assistant-siri-ai-at-wwdc-2026-gemini-partnership-now-official/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">offers limited capacity for more complex tasks</a> through <a href="https://www.applemust.com/apple-commences-us-manufacturing-of-private-cloud-compute-servers/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Private Cloud Compute</a>, and, in partnership with the likes of Google in the US and Alibaba in China, the company is giving users a trusted conduit through which to access even more sophisticated AI services. </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Deeply deployable</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Critics can say it <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4168225/wwdc-2026-how-apple-can-take-a-great-leap-in-ai.html">took Apple a long time</a> to get to this point, but they also seem to think the company has finally got the mix right with its series 27 operating systems. Arriving late to a party <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4164979/apple-will-be-behind-on-ai-until-it-isnt.html">doesn’t mean you won’t shine once you get there</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Apple is also coming up the inside lane around frontier AI, with iterative OS and hardware enhancements that mean its devices become increasingly effective for <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4016798/why-i-hope-apple-keeps-investing-in-on-device-ai.html">Edge AI use cases</a>, on device — no cloud service required.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The company appears to be digging down into those use cases. Mark Gurman at Bloomberg recently predicted that <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/semiconductors/apples-rumored-m7-ultra-targets-1-5tb-of-memory-and-blackwell-class-ai" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">future M7 Ultra Macs</a> will support as much as 1.5TB RAM, making these systems more than capable of running full weight frontier models in people’s offices, colleges, and homes. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While that does assume the <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4187825/the-trillion-dollar-ai-hallucination.html">AI-flationary memory market</a> can supply that much RAM at prices humans can afford, it is also true that people are already <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4092162/apples-macos-ai-for-the-rest-of-us.html">running AI clusters</a> using off-the-shelf Mac minis networked over Thunderbolt cables. It’s no stretch to believe <a href="https://www.applemust.com/macweb-now-offers-mac-mini-cloud-clusters-in-east-coast-data-centre/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">this will continue to be the case</a>, and that it will even broaden as the power/performance offered at the high end grows.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What’s wrong with good enough?</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When combined with open AI stacks, particularly newly emerging varieties, Apple’s platforms should become leading contenders for <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4074648/apples-big-bang-ai-moment-is-approaching.html">private AI services</a> and edge AI. Many business users will leap at the chance to offer their workers powerful, self-hosted, private AI services using one or more daisy-chained Mac Studios or Mac minis. The recent craze in deployment of both Macs to support <a href="https://openclaw.ai/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">OpenClaw</a> instances shows they already are.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ultimately, these different slices of momentum mean I agree with <a href="https://podcastalpha.substack.com/p/all-in-can-ai-regulate-itself-stripe" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">investor Jason Calacanis</a> that Apple is in position to apply a great deal of pressure on OpenAI and Claude just by putting models on their devices. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It’s also worth thinking about how people use AI today. How many of the queries made in the world right now constitute relatively simple tasks that could be transacted by on-device AI, such as the emerging new version of Apple Intelligence or even smaller LLM models running on device? You can even run <a href="https://9to5mac.com/2026/07/14/prismml-releases-bonsai-27b-claiming-first-major-ai-model-of-its-size-fit-for-iphone/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">PrismML’s 1-bit, 27-billion parameter Bonsai</a> on an iPad using the Locally app, and that’s in the here and now.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What happens? Pretty soon you’ll find people recognize that they can already run the vast majority of their AI-augmented workflows using services they <a href="https://www.applemust.com/morgan-stanley-its-when-not-if-apple-will-deliver-ai-on-the-edge/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">have on their existing device</a> or can access on their on-prem Mac set-ups. And, of course, as people get used to running small tasks locally and larger tasks on premises, the actual space in which they need to turn to cloud-based frontier models <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4195657/apple-is-prepping-for-life-after-the-ai-gold-rush.html">will erode</a>. That’s even as companies like PrismML work towards slimming down full-weight models so they don’t need to run on a server at all. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“It’s going to be wild when people have unlimited tokens on their desks,” said Calacanis in a podcast round table discussion.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Who has the most to lose?</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The current incarnations of AI felt like they came from nowhere. Most people weren’t aware of the technology until returning to work after the 2022 holiday season. Since then, the industry has proliferated with dozens of competing models, most recently including powerful but affordable frontier models such as Qwen and Kimi.ai.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These models aren’t necessarily all as good as one another, but in many cases for much of what we do, we’ll find them to be good enough. That’s an existential crisis for some, as industry observers now think the inevitable pricing pressure means some services might have over-invested in capacity before finding any way to turn a profit.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Those profit-seeking services are the ones with the most to lose as Apple extends its hardware advantage, democratizing AI access for all while providing platforms suitable for edge AI, on-premises AI, private AI, and even AI access using third-party services. (The need for the latter will shrink as the capabilities of the former get better.)</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Cupertino rising</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What does this all mean? While the industry remains young, it is already fragmenting. And striding through the dust of that process comes Apple, equipped with the hardware, software, and approach to build its business even as the enterprise of first mover AI services erodes. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>You can follow me on social media! Join me on <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/jonnyevanssays.bsky.social" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">BlueSky</a>,  <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/jonnyevans" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">LinkedIn</a>, <a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/@jonnyevans" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Mastodon</a> and subscribe to my daily Apple-related news summaries at <a href="https://thecorenews.substack.com/p/welcome-to-the-core?r=5l3lg" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Core</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA['For humans, the capacity to say, 'I don't know,' is very important': Report finds AI really might be harming our critical thinking skills]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[New paper reveals human critical thinking could be declining as participants choose to trust AI-generated outputs too much.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681233/it-nachrichten/for-humans-the-capacity-to-say-i-dont-know-is-very-important-report-finds-ai-really-might-be-harming-our-critical-thinking-skills/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681233/it-nachrichten/for-humans-the-capacity-to-say-i-dont-know-is-very-important-report-finds-ai-really-might-be-harming-our-critical-thinking-skills/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 15:17:56 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[New paper reveals human critical thinking could be declining as participants choose to trust AI-generated outputs too much.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CVE-2026-49790 | Microsoft Windows up to Server 2025 Universal Disk Format File System Driver heap-based overflow]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A vulnerability has been found in Microsoft Windows and classified as problematic. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the component Universal Disk Format File System Driver. Performing a manipulation results in heap-based buffer overflow.

This vulnerability was named CVE-202...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681126/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-49790-microsoft-windows-up-to-server-2025-universal-disk-format-file-system-driver-heap-based-overflow/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681126/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-49790-microsoft-windows-up-to-server-2025-universal-disk-format-file-system-driver-heap-based-overflow/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 14:39:42 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A vulnerability has been found in <a href="https://vuldb.com/product/microsoft:windows">Microsoft Windows</a> and classified as <a href="https://vuldb.com/kb/risk">problematic</a>. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the component <em>Universal Disk Format File System Driver</em>. Performing a manipulation results in heap-based buffer overflow.

This vulnerability was named <a href="https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-49790">CVE-2026-49790</a>. The attack needs to be approached locally. There is no available exploit.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Q&A: Why boutique consultancies might be better for AI rollouts than the bigwigs]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Major AI labs are unleashing forward-deployed engineers (FDEs) to try and grab enterprise customers. Large consultancies are dishing out tokens and assembling armies of consultants — both human and agent — to do the same.



But smaller firms are in the mix now, as well. AI is helping 28Stone Con...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3680996/it-nachrichten/qa-why-boutique-consultancies-might-be-better-for-ai-rollouts-than-the-bigwigs/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3680996/it-nachrichten/qa-why-boutique-consultancies-might-be-better-for-ai-rollouts-than-the-bigwigs/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 13:33:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Major AI labs are <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4171867/heres-one-career-emerging-from-the-ai-shift-forward-deployed-engineers.html">unleashing forward-deployed engineers</a> (FDEs) to try and grab enterprise customers. Large consultancies are dishing out tokens and assembling armies of consultants — both human and agent — to do the same.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But smaller firms are in the mix now, as well. AI is helping <a href="https://www.28stone.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">28Stone Consulting</a>, a New York-based, 230-person technology consultancy for capital markets, punch above its weight against larger rivals in the <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4180088/ai-vendor-fdes-key-considerations-and-concerns.html">rush to deliver FDEs</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In this Q&amp;A, <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/thomas-dolan-4124914" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Thomas Dolan</a> and <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/frank-erickson-07675a1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Frank Erickson</a>, founders of 28Stone, argue that agentic AI isn’t a one-size-fits-all solution in vertical markets; success takes discipline, deep domain expertise, and human involvement to mitigate risk.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many enterprises continue to struggle with the use of AI agents, which is consultancies are stepping in to get projects off the ground. 28Stone is among those that have published blueprints and methodologies on the development and delivery of agentic AI workflows with humans in the loop.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Computerworld</em> spoke with both founding partners about why companies are still stumbling with <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4083589/from-chatbots-to-colleagues-how-agentic-ai-is-redefining-enterprise-automation.html">agentic AI rollouts</a>, and what a disciplined delivery process actually looks like.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>After 15 years of delivering software for capital markets firms, is ‘AI-first’ a real distinction or just positioning?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Dolan:</strong> “We’re not shying away from being AI-forward. What needs to shine through is AI done intelligently — not stuff you get by buying some tokens for somebody on the trading desk. We’re an AI-first firm.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Erickson:</strong> “And it’s temporary. At some point, AI is going to be synonymous with software development.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The whole idea of an AI SDLC (software development lifecycle) versus an SDLC is going to be one and the same, a lot like cloud computing today. To not include AI in your strategy, you’d look like a COBOL vendor.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>What does agentic AI delivery look like?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Dolan:</strong> “We’ve got several AI initiatives delivering a pure agentic approach. We’ve doubled down on the human expertise wrapper in the SDLC. That doesn’t mean sacrificing any of the benefits of the AI models — quite the opposite.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“You don’t achieve anywhere near the same level of value from applying AI without keeping that expertise — industry, functional and technical — throughout the process.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Where do humans stay in the loop once agents are doing the work?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Dolan:</strong> “We’re believers in starting with requirements discovery. Someone who knows the analytical nuances of a good business analyst is critically important; shaping a product owner’s business information through a markup file that can be fed into a BA agent, then treating the output as if it came from a very fast junior BA. Only then is the story complete.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The developer takes that story, transforms it into the most efficient input, then owns the output, because they’re accountable for that code. A developer should own the code on both the input and output side.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Your product owner, who knows the business, that’s great. But expecting them to interact with an agent and output enterprise code is ridiculous. It’s not a great plan.“</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Why not just put one do-everything person in charge of AI and agents?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Erickson:</strong> “Every analyst, programmer or software engineer isn’t a great requirements analyst. And a great domain analyst with some technical background won’t know if the agent’s code is garbage, maintainable, performant.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“It’s unrealistic to expect one individual to have that breadth across domain, software engineering, testing, deployment. Clients ask all the time, and we push back: ‘Great, if you can find that guy, they’re few and far between.’ To deliver at the enterprise level, you need the human expertise, at depth.“</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Dolan:</strong> “There’s system speed and latency, important in parts of finance. Then there’s speed of delivery, because other areas evolve quickly and time-to-market is critical.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Our human wrapper may at first pass come across as a little slowed down. Maybe it is. But [Erickson] has a good analogy about one of the dangers of AI: you can end up going really fast in the wrong direction. By the time you look up, you’re way off base and have to backtrack.“</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>What about AI in your sector do you think is overhyped?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Dolan:</strong> “The hype around the ease of use of AI and the democratization of enterprise software delivery — that ‘anybody could do it now, it’s all being done by machines’ — is another idea that could prove costly in the long run.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“This do-it-yourself reaction is dangerous for clients, and for trust in the overall AI benefit, which is real. We compare it to the beginning of offshoring 20, 30 years ago: a golden idea that was going to cure everything. A lot of firms did it thoughtlessly, thinking it’s just labor arbitrage, and it almost inevitably failed. That all-or-nothing mentality missed that offshoring is an amazing way of getting better value for your dollar, but it has to be done thoughtfully, so the delivery process — the thing that ties it all together — stays unsevered.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We’re seeing that now. I’ve heard, ‘We’ll just push a button, the machine’s building the system.’ The machine is not building the system. It might be writing the code, the story, running the tests.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The system is built by a team of engineers you bring in and trust. My fear is that people will say, ‘We don’t need this vendor or this technology team. I’ve got a product team. They might not be able to code at all, but they know the business,’ and it fails dramatically. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Then people say, ‘We played with AI, it’s not ready yet,’ and throw it all away. One of the best things we can do is ensure clients know the benefit is real.“</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Erickson:</strong> “The hype can be summed up in a single phrase: <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4022711/when-everything-is-vibing.html">vibe coding</a>. That has done AI a massive disservice, because there’s a huge difference between vibe coding and enterprise software development, and some of the loudest proponents of AI are too latched on to it. In our industry, the only way to succeed would be a stable of unicorns. It just doesn’t scale. I get perturbed when our people internally refer to AI tooling as vibe coding; if they think that’s what they’re doing, they’re misunderstood.“</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>When you engage clients at different levels of AI maturity, how do you get them to a understand what works?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Dolan:</strong> “95% of our take on an agentic approach is in line with everyone else’s, but that 5% matters, especially in requirements discovery, in who’s giving the requirements and how they’re thought of. It can set you up for dramatic errors, given the speed at which you’re moving.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“There’s a dangerous human tendency we’re seeing among clients to try and cut corners at the start of a project and — in lieu of having deep, expert driven discovery sessions — just summarize what they may want using AI.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We would hope our clients are collaborative, everyone understanding it’s early days. If a client insists on doing something we feel strongly against, like a product owner completely owning everything right up to code generation, that’s an issue we have to either push back strongly on or step out of the accountability for.“</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>AI body shops — LLM providers and giant consultancies — are emerging to help enterprises deploy AI. Does that model work?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Dolan:</strong> “Whether you’re partnering with an LLM or with an AI-first, generic software provider — ‘Hey, we’re not industry guys, but we know AI delivery’ — you end up, if you’re a bank or a broker-dealer, saying: ‘All right, we know our business, these guys know the AI side of it. What could go wrong? Put us together and we’ll have quality engineering.’</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The problem is what you miss: the know-how of putting industry and technical expertise together and actually delivering financial services systems. The people working at the generic delivery firms, whether an AI-only firm or a body shop somewhere, don’t have that capability.“</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Does AI change the economics for smaller consultancies like yours competing against the big firms, and does it cut both ways?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Dolan:</strong> “Over our 15 years pre-AI, there were two recurring reasons we’d lose a project. One: ‘We’d love to work with you guys, given your subject matter expertise, but the costs just aren’t there compared to my budgets. I’m being forced to go to a body shop or an [offshore] delivery center.’ The other side of that coin: ‘We love your capabilities, but you’re a firm of 230 people and I need 300, 400 people.’</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“AI changes the options for clients. You don’t have to sacrifice the niche vendor who knows your space just because you need a larger team or a cost target. AI levels the playing field and should allow smaller firms to compete with the larger, big-box generic firms, the Accentures of the world.“</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Erickson:</strong> “It redefines what scale means. You can look at velocity as a measure of your cost to deliver, not a rate card. Scale can’t be defined in terms of headcount anymore. It’s got to be defined in terms of output.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“There’s a threat in it, too. If you’re an Accenture with hundreds of thousands of low-cost software engineers, how do you train all those people? I feel for them. But for us, a couple hundred people with a specific domain focus, it’s a huge opportunity.“</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>How has the profile of the people you and others hire changed with this agentic process?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Erickson:</strong> “You’re still looking for people with strong engineering and design backgrounds, and communication skills, because they interact across the software development lifecycle more than in the past.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Many take too much joy in typing out perfect code. Sorry, I don’t need you writing for-loops and classes anymore. I need you reviewing them, understanding them, operating at a higher level. That’s a different kind of person: an engineer, not a programmer or a coder. On the [business analyst] side it’s similar: people took great pride in detailed user stories covering every path. Now it’s conversations, prompts, reviewing output — less doing, more interacting.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“More than ever, they have to be interested in the domain. They can’t just be, ‘I want to learn everything there is to know about Java.’ That’s too narrow. They don’t have to be an expert; they have to be interested. In our case, capital markets is a specific niche. The biggest challenge is getting familiar with the tools — finding time, while delivering for customers, to ramp up and make the mistakes you need to without jeopardizing projects.“</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>What about governance? Who’s keeping AI delivery and its costs under control?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Erickson:</strong> “This is evolving rapidly. People aren’t sure how to put governance around this. The most obvious is financial governance. People are starting to get hefty bills. One of our clients spent a million dollars on tokens over the last eight weeks alone. Sticker shock. The token-maxing policies are starting to show their flaws. It’s wild west still: learn on the fly, then figure out what needs to be governed.“</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Are CIOs actually opening their wallets? And when they do, what’s the smarter way to invest?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Erickson:</strong> “There’s still a lot of caution. Forecasts keep going down on how long something should take. So: ‘I could wait three months and maybe still get it delivered by the same date someone’s promising me now, but for half the price. I’m going to wait and see when equilibrium is met.’ We haven’t seen the wallets open up like crazy — it’s slow adoption.“</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Dolan:</strong> “One of our clients is looking at it from a productivity-boost perspective: instead of doing the same for less, I can do much more for the same. AI lets clients pull the trigger on things they wouldn’t have in the past — projects that might not have been approved pre-AI, where the costs have come down to a point that’s palatable with the business.“</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Erickson:</strong> “And that’s the story we’re hoping to hear more of. There isn’t a huge cost anymore to exploring a business opportunity. The time and money that would have gone to a return-on-investment study could be spent on a proof-of-concept with AI, and the project done a few weeks later. Maybe [there’s] a hint of things to come, where decisions start being made quicker. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“There’s a little fear on our side, though: a lot of tiny little projects is tough for a consulting business.“</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[ShotMark: Kleine App für Notizen rund um Screenshots]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Wir haben es doch alle schon mal getan: Einen Screenshot gemacht, um sich irgendetwas zu merken. Aber findet ihr den Screenshot später auch noch unter allen anderen Fotos und wisst ihr dann noch genau, worum es eigentlich konkret ging? Eine Hilfe für genau dieses Unterfangen ist ShotMark (App Sto...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3680947/ios-mac-os/shotmark-kleine-app-fuer-notizen-rund-um-screenshots/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3680947/ios-mac-os/shotmark-kleine-app-fuer-notizen-rund-um-screenshots/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 13:09:33 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wir haben es doch alle schon mal getan: Einen Screenshot gemacht, um sich irgendetwas zu merken. Aber findet ihr den Screenshot später auch noch unter allen anderen Fotos und wisst ihr dann noch genau, worum es eigentlich konkret ging? Eine Hilfe für genau dieses Unterfangen ist ShotMark (App Store-Link). Die kleine Universal-App für iPhone und […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.appgefahren.de/shotmark-kleine-app-fuer-notizen-rund-um-screenshots-402583.html">ShotMark: Kleine App für Notizen rund um Screenshots</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.appgefahren.de/">appgefahren.de</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Independence, Trust & AI: The ESET Story]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: ESET - Bewertung: 0x - Views:49 At ESET, cybersecurity isn’t just about reacting to threats, it’s about understanding them, learning from them, and staying ahead of them. For nearly 40 years, we’ve built our expertise on independence, long-term thinking, and deep global insight.

From pro...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3680895/it-security-video/independence-trust-ai-the-eset-story/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3680895/it-security-video/independence-trust-ai-the-eset-story/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 12:48:53 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: ESET - Bewertung: 0x - Views:49 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/LJJB3Kvyd2o?autoplay=1&origin=http://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p>At ESET, cybersecurity isn’t just about reacting to threats, it’s about understanding them, learning from them, and staying ahead of them. For nearly 40 years, we’ve built our expertise on independence, long-term thinking, and deep global insight.<br />
<br />
From proprietary technology developed in-house to real-time telemetry that gives us a front-row seat to the world’s most complex cyber challenges, we believe in one principle above all: you can’t protect what you don’t truly understand.<br />
<br />
In this video, our founders and experts share what makes ESET different:<br />
• Why independence is critical to cybersecurity integrity<br />
• How we train and use AI responsibly<br />
• What decades of threat intelligence have taught us<br />
• Why trust is built over years not moments<br />
• How we balance innovation with responsibility<br />
<br />
We don’t rush decisions. We don’t follow trends blindly. We build solutions that last guided by values that outlast change.<br />
<br />
Connect with us on: https://www.eset.com/ https://www.facebook.com/eset https://www.linkedin.com/company/eset/  https://www.instagram.com/eset/ https://x.com/ESET<br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Schluss mit Faxgeräten: Gesundheitsgesetz soll Millionen einsparen]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag Schluss mit Faxgeräten: Gesundheitsgesetz soll Millionen einsparen erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Das Bundeskabinett hat am 15. Juli 2026 ein neues Gesundheitsgesetz beschlossen...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3680675/it-security-nachrichten/schluss-mit-faxgeraeten-gesundheitsgesetz-soll-millionen-einsparen/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3680675/it-security-nachrichten/schluss-mit-faxgeraeten-gesundheitsgesetz-soll-millionen-einsparen/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 11:09:00 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/20/neues-digitales-gesundheitsgesetz-gedig/">Schluss mit Faxgeräten: Gesundheitsgesetz soll Millionen einsparen</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Das Bundeskabinett hat am 15. Juli 2026 ein neues Gesundheitsgesetz beschlossen. Es soll die elektronische Patientenakte massiv aufwerten, die E-Überweisung auf den Weg bringen und jedes Jahr rund 445 Millionen Euro einsparen. Für Patienten bedeutet das konkret: weniger Papierkram, schnellere Facharzt-Termine und eine ePA, die den Namen Health-Hub erstmals verdient hat. Eine kommentierende Analyse. Neues […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/20/neues-digitales-gesundheitsgesetz-gedig/">Schluss mit Faxgeräten: Gesundheitsgesetz soll Millionen einsparen</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[In 14 Tagen zum Bootsführerschein: Was steckt hinter dem Bootsschule1® All-Inklusive-Paket?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag In 14 Tagen zum Bootsführerschein: Was steckt hinter dem Bootsschule1® All-Inklusive-Paket? erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Wer schnell und unkompliziert einen Bootsführerschein ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3680533/it-security-nachrichten/in-14-tagen-zum-bootsfuehrerschein-was-steckt-hinter-dem-bootsschule1-all-inklusive-paket/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3680533/it-security-nachrichten/in-14-tagen-zum-bootsfuehrerschein-was-steckt-hinter-dem-bootsschule1-all-inklusive-paket/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 10:07:22 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/20/in-14-tagen-zum-bootsfuehrerschein-was-steckt-hinter-dem-bootsschule1-all-inklusive-paket/">In 14 Tagen zum Bootsführerschein: Was steckt hinter dem Bootsschule1® All-Inklusive-Paket?</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Wer schnell und unkompliziert einen Bootsführerschein machen möchte, steht oft vor der gleichen Frage: Klassische Bootsschule vor Ort oder moderner Online-Kurs? Bootsschule1® verbindet beides: mit einer volldigitalen Lernplattform, einem persönlichen Ansprechpartner und über 100 Praxisstandorten in ganz Deutschland. Was das Angebot wirklich taugt, was Teilnehmer in ihren Bootsschule1 Erfahrungen berichten und warum die Bestehensquote bei […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/20/in-14-tagen-zum-bootsfuehrerschein-was-steckt-hinter-dem-bootsschule1-all-inklusive-paket/">In 14 Tagen zum Bootsführerschein: Was steckt hinter dem Bootsschule1® All-Inklusive-Paket?</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Deutsche KI-Firmen nutzen US-Technik – trotz Souveränitätsversprechen]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag Deutsche KI-Firmen nutzen US-Technik – trotz Souveränitätsversprechen erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Viele deutsche KI-Unternehmen nutzen Sprachmodelle und werben mit digitaler ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3680211/it-nachrichten/deutsche-ki-firmen-nutzen-us-technik-trotz-souveraenitaetsversprechen/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3680211/it-nachrichten/deutsche-ki-firmen-nutzen-us-technik-trotz-souveraenitaetsversprechen/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 05:47:24 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/20/ki-modelle-deutsche-unternehmen/">Deutsche KI-Firmen nutzen US-Technik – trotz Souveränitätsversprechen</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Viele deutsche KI-Unternehmen nutzen Sprachmodelle und werben mit digitaler Souveränität. Eine neue Untersuchung zeigt jedoch, dass ein Großteil trotzdem auf US-Technologie setzt. Wir zeigen, wo die Souveränitätslücke am größten ist. Ob im Kundenservice, in der Rechtsabteilung oder in der Produktentwicklung: Künstliche Intelligenz ist in vielen Unternehmen ein fester Bestandteil des Arbeitsalltags, auch in Deutschland. Ein […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/20/ki-modelle-deutsche-unternehmen/">Deutsche KI-Firmen nutzen US-Technik – trotz Souveränitätsversprechen</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Someone Fine-Tuned OpenBMB’s MiniCPM5-1B on Claude Fable 5 Traces to Ship a 657MB Local Thinking Model]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A community developer fine-tuned OpenBMB's MiniCPM5-1B on Claude Fable 5 traces into a 1B model that runs fully local — a 657MB smallest build, 128K context, and visible reasoning. We verify every spec against the Hugging Face cards, separate what a fine-tune actually inherits from real capabilit...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3680210/ai-nachrichten/someone-fine-tuned-openbmbs-minicpm5-1b-on-claude-fable-5-traces-to-ship-a-657mb-local-thinking-model/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3680210/ai-nachrichten/someone-fine-tuned-openbmbs-minicpm5-1b-on-claude-fable-5-traces-to-ship-a-657mb-local-thinking-model/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 05:18:12 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A community developer fine-tuned OpenBMB's MiniCPM5-1B on Claude Fable 5 traces into a 1B model that runs fully local — a 657MB smallest build, 128K context, and visible reasoning. We verify every spec against the Hugging Face cards, separate what a fine-tune actually inherits from real capability, and flag the licensing question the model card leaves open.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.marktechpost.com/2026/07/19/someone-fine-tuned-openbmbs-minicpm5-1b-on-claude-fable-5-traces-to-ship-a-657mb-local-thinking-model/">Someone Fine-Tuned OpenBMB’s MiniCPM5-1B on Claude Fable 5 Traces to Ship a 657MB Local Thinking Model</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.marktechpost.com/">MarkTechPost</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Netflix’s Desire Ending Explained: Who Killed Matías and What Happens to Lucero?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Netflix’s Desire ends by revealing that nearly every member of Lucero’s family played a role in Matías’ death. The final poolside sequence explains how jealousy, betrayal and fear turned a secret affair into a fatal family cover-up.



Major spoilers for Desire follow.



Desire Release Date, Cas...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3680069/ios-mac-os/netflixs-desire-ending-explained-who-killed-matas-and-what-happens-to-lucero/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3680069/ios-mac-os/netflixs-desire-ending-explained-who-killed-matas-and-what-happens-to-lucero/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 00:24:19 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Netflix’s Desire ends by revealing that nearly every member of Lucero’s family played a role in Matías’ death. The final poolside sequence explains how jealousy, betrayal and fear turned a secret affair into a fatal family cover-up.



Major spoilers for Desire follow.



Desire Release Date, Cast and Other Details




Netflix release date: July 17, 2026



Original title: Deseo



Genre: Erotic thriller, psychological drama



Runtime: Around 98 minutes



Director: Teresa Simone



Language: Spanish



Main cast: Ludwika Paleta, Óscar Casas, José María Yazpik and Pilar Pascual




The Mexican-Spanish movie follows Lucero, a successful 47-year-old lawyer who appears to have a comfortable life with her husband, Fernando, and their two children. However, she feels increasingly dissatisfied with her marriage and begins an affair with Matías, the young swimming coach hired by Fernando.



The situation becomes more dangerous when Lucero’s daughter, Viviana, also develops feelings for Matías. What begins as an affair soon becomes a tense triangle involving secrecy, manipulation and jealousy.



Where Is the Story Heading Before the Final Scene?



The movie opens with blood near the family’s indoor swimming pool, immediately confirming that someone has died. It then moves back through the events that caused the tragedy.



Lucero’s relationship with Matías grows more intense, even as she understands that the affair could destroy her marriage, career and relationship with her children. Matías also becomes involved with Viviana, creating further tension inside the family.



As the truth begins to surface, each character reacts differently. Viviana feels betrayed by both Matías and her mother, while Fernando begins to understand what has been happening inside his home. Lucero, meanwhile, focuses on protecting her family and preventing the affair from becoming public.



Since Desire is a standalone movie, there are no previous seasons to revisit. The entire story builds toward the night at the pool and the mystery surrounding Matías’ death.



Desire Ending Explained: Who Killed Matías?



The ending reveals that Matías’ death was caused by several actions rather than one sudden attack.



Julian secretly drugs Matías earlier in the evening. The drug leaves him physically weakened and less capable of defending himself when the conflict reaches the swimming pool.



Viviana then confronts Matías after discovering the truth about his relationship with Lucero. Feeling humiliated and used, she attacks him and leaves him injured.



Fernando later finds Matías bleeding and struggling in the pool. Instead of rescuing him, Fernando chooses to leave him there. His decision makes him directly responsible for allowing the situation to become fatal.



Lucero arrives for the final confrontation and sees that Matías is still alive. Matías appears to believe that she has come to help him or choose him over her family. However, Lucero pushes him beneath the water and holds him there until he drowns.



Lucero therefore delivers the final killing act, although every member of the family contributes to the chain of events that leads to his death.



Why Does Lucero Kill Matías?



Lucero kills Matías because she sees him as a threat to everything she wants to protect. Their affair once offered excitement and escape, but it eventually endangered her children, marriage and public life.



By the final scene, Lucero no longer views Matías as a romantic partner. She sees him as the person capable of exposing the family’s secrets and destroying their remaining sense of stability.



Her decision also completes her transformation. She begins the movie searching for freedom from her controlled life, yet she ends it committing murder to regain control.



Does Lucero’s Family Escape?



The movie does not show the family facing immediate legal consequences. Since several people contributed to Matías’ death, they share a reason to hide what happened.



The final revelation suggests that their family can remain together only by protecting the same secret. Any one of them could expose the others, creating an uneasy balance based on guilt rather than trust.



The opening bloodstains also take on a clearer meaning. They represent the evidence the family must remove, but they also reflect damage that cannot be completely erased.



What Does the Ending of Desire Mean?



The ending shows how unchecked desire damages every relationship around Lucero. Her affair affects her husband, draws her daughter into a painful rivalry and eventually turns the entire family into participants in Matías’ death.



Lucero technically protects her family from Matías, but their earlier life cannot return. Fernando knows about her betrayal, Viviana knows that her mother was involved with the same man, and everyone understands what happened beside the pool.



Desire ends without offering a clean resolution because the family’s punishment comes from living with the truth. What did you think about Lucero’s final decision, and who carries the most blame for Matías’ death? Let us know in the comments.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Mira Murati’s Thinking Machines draws from Chinese rivals in debut AI model]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Former OpenAI CTO’s start-up raised $2bn last year at $12bn valuation]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3679485/ai-nachrichten/mira-muratis-thinking-machines-draws-from-chinese-rivals-in-debut-ai-model/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3679485/ai-nachrichten/mira-muratis-thinking-machines-draws-from-chinese-rivals-in-debut-ai-model/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 14:48:50 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Former OpenAI CTO’s start-up raised $2bn last year at $12bn valuation]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[When Will The Odyssey Be on Netflix? Expected Streaming Release Date]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Christopher Nolan’s The Odyssey opened in theaters worldwide on July 17, 2026, but Netflix subscribers will probably wait until summer 2027 before the movie becomes available to stream in the United States.



Universal Pictures now follows a new streaming arrangement for its live-action movies, ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3679476/ios-mac-os/when-will-the-odyssey-be-on-netflix-expected-streaming-release-date/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3679476/ios-mac-os/when-will-the-odyssey-be-on-netflix-expected-streaming-release-date/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 14:36:30 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Christopher Nolan’s The Odyssey opened in theaters worldwide on July 17, 2026, but Netflix subscribers will probably wait until summer 2027 before the movie becomes available to stream in the United States.



Universal Pictures now follows a new streaming arrangement for its live-action movies, which places Netflix inside the first major paid streaming window after Peacock. The agreement started in 2026 and covers large theatrical releases such as The Odyssey.



The film stars Matt Damon as Odysseus and follows his long journey home after the Trojan War. Tom Holland, Anne Hathaway, Robert Pattinson, Lupita Nyong’o, Zendaya, and Charlize Theron also appear in the cast, while Nolan filmed the production entirely with IMAX cameras.



The Odyssey Netflix release date prediction



Universal usually keeps its major movies in theaters before moving them through a fixed streaming schedule. However, a strong box office run can delay each stage, especially when a movie continues earning well for several months.



The expected release timeline currently looks like this:




Theatrical release: July 17, 2026



Estimated Peacock release: February or March 2027



Estimated Netflix release: June or July 2027



Later Peacock return: After the Netflix window ends




The Odyssey may follow a longer theatrical path because Nolan’s previous Universal film, Oppenheimer, stayed away from streaming for around seven months after its cinema release. Universal may use a similar strategy if The Odyssey performs strongly worldwide.



When will The Odyssey stream internationally?



Netflix availability outside the United States will depend on local agreements with Universal Pictures. Some parts of Central Europe and Latin America may receive the movie in late 2027, while viewers in the UK and Canada may wait until the middle or second half of 2028.



Other regions may face an even longer delay, so digital rental and purchase platforms will probably offer the fastest home-viewing option before the movie reaches Netflix.



For now, June or July 2027 remains the most realistic estimate for The Odyssey to arrive on Netflix in the United States.




https://youtu.be/AyIZ9tiiN8I?si=HgZHB36z1FdHkUaq]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Menopause.exe:running_with_limited_resources "Hacking the Hormonal System Update" (emf2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Menopause is a hormone system update you didn’t ask for: no consent, no user manual, and no warning label. Once installed, it triggers a ripple effect across social, mental, physical, and work systems. Subtly rewriting routines and behaviors almost overnight. The system you once knew, which used ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3679466/it-security-video/menopauseexerunningwithlimitedresources-hacking-the-hormonal-system-update-emf2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3679466/it-security-video/menopauseexerunningwithlimitedresources-hacking-the-hormonal-system-update-emf2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 14:31:59 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Menopause is a hormone system update you didn’t ask for: no consent, no user manual, and no warning label. Once installed, it triggers a ripple effect across social, mental, physical, and work systems. Subtly rewriting routines and behaviors almost overnight. The system you once knew, which used to run seamlessly, now requires debugging, optimization, and at times a little creative patching.
Menopause affects over 1 billion individuals worldwide, yet it remains poorly understood. Despite its universal impact, it is shrouded in myths and a pervasive enforced silence, leaving many unprepared for the changes it brings. This presentation reframes menopause as a hormone system update, exploring how it can subtly, and sometimes dramatically alters life experiences. Viewed through the lens of anyone who has ever had to troubleshoot a stubborn, unpredictable system, this presentation examines how this important life transition and why understanding these changes matter for you and your community. 
My aim is to have an honest conversation about this topic that empowers you with self-advocacy.
Drawing on my own lived experience and as a certified menopause coach, this talk blends data, humor, and clear language to unpack what happens during menopause and why “just pushing through it” is not a viable workaround. I’ll highlight the latest stats, debug common myths, and reveal how menopause quietly affects your entire life.
We can’t roll back the update, but we can optimize the system.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://www.emfcamp.org/schedule/2026/153-menopause-exe-running-with-limited-resources-hacking-the]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Menopause.exe:running_with_limited_resources "Hacking the Hormonal System Update" (emf2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Menopause is a hormone system update you didn’t ask for: no consent, no user manual, and no warning label. Once installed, it triggers a ripple effect across social, mental, physical, and work systems. Subtly rewriting routines and behaviors almost overnight. The system you once knew, which used ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3679424/it-security-video/menopauseexerunningwithlimitedresources-hacking-the-hormonal-system-update-emf2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3679424/it-security-video/menopauseexerunningwithlimitedresources-hacking-the-hormonal-system-update-emf2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 14:03:18 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Menopause is a hormone system update you didn’t ask for: no consent, no user manual, and no warning label. Once installed, it triggers a ripple effect across social, mental, physical, and work systems. Subtly rewriting routines and behaviors almost overnight. The system you once knew, which used to run seamlessly, now requires debugging, optimization, and at times a little creative patching.
Menopause affects over 1 billion individuals worldwide, yet it remains poorly understood. Despite its universal impact, it is shrouded in myths and a pervasive enforced silence, leaving many unprepared for the changes it brings. This presentation reframes menopause as a hormone system update, exploring how it can subtly, and sometimes dramatically alters life experiences. Viewed through the lens of anyone who has ever had to troubleshoot a stubborn, unpredictable system, this presentation examines how this important life transition and why understanding these changes matter for you and your community. 
My aim is to have an honest conversation about this topic that empowers you with self-advocacy.
Drawing on my own lived experience and as a certified menopause coach, this talk blends data, humor, and clear language to unpack what happens during menopause and why “just pushing through it” is not a viable workaround. I’ll highlight the latest stats, debug common myths, and reveal how menopause quietly affects your entire life.
We can’t roll back the update, but we can optimize the system.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://www.emfcamp.org/schedule/2026/153-menopause-exe-running-with-limited-resources-hacking-the]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[An SRE's Guide to Camping in Extreme Conditions (emf2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Winter camping in the Alps sounds beautiful… doesn't it? 

That is, until the pipes freeze or the heating goes out when it’s -21°C outside. By day, I'm an SRE responsible for incident management, triaging alerts, and calling in subject matter experts when required. It turns out that those skills ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3679415/it-security-video/an-sres-guide-to-camping-in-extreme-conditions-emf2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3679415/it-security-video/an-sres-guide-to-camping-in-extreme-conditions-emf2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 13:47:51 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Winter camping in the Alps sounds beautiful… doesn't it? 

That is, until the pipes freeze or the heating goes out when it’s -21°C outside. By day, I'm an SRE responsible for incident management, triaging alerts, and calling in subject matter experts when required. It turns out that those skills are transferable to handling real-life situations, too!

In this talk, I’ll share a fun (slightly traumatic) guide to applying SRE thinking to camping. I'll talk about hacky fixes to resolve the immediate impact, the process of narrowing down the root cause, and the beauty of pattern matching in observability. 

You’ll see that monitoring, escalation, and redundancy aren’t just for data centres. They’re survival tools.

If you’ve ever been on-call or just like a good disaster story, join me for this slightly chaotic, entirely true adventure in off-grid reliability.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://www.emfcamp.org/schedule/2026/230-an-sres-guide-to-camping-in-extreme-conditions]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google Deepmind argues video generators already contain the world models computer vision has been missing]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Google Deepmind's GenCeption repurposes a video generator for classic vision tasks such as depth estimation and segmentation, matching state-of-the-art systems with far less training data. The model trained almost entirely on synthetic videos. Its results add to the debate over whether video gene...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3679343/ai-nachrichten/google-deepmind-argues-video-generators-already-contain-the-world-models-computer-vision-has-been-missing/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3679343/ai-nachrichten/google-deepmind-argues-video-generators-already-contain-the-world-models-computer-vision-has-been-missing/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 12:48:39 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="1920" height="1047" src="https://the-decoder.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/google-deepmind-genception-generated-image-nano-banana-pro.jpg" class="attachment-full size-full wp-post-image" alt="Digital artwork: an urban street scene featuring buildings and a sidewalk, overlaid with colorful geometric AI overlays." decoding="async" fetchpriority="high"></p>
<p>        Google Deepmind's GenCeption repurposes a video generator for classic vision tasks such as depth estimation and segmentation, matching state-of-the-art systems with far less training data. The model trained almost entirely on synthetic videos. Its results add to the debate over whether video generators already contain a kind of universal world model.</p>
<p>The article <a href="https://the-decoder.com/google-deepmind-argues-video-generators-already-contain-the-world-models-computer-vision-has-been-missing/">Google Deepmind argues video generators already contain the world models computer vision has been missing</a> appeared first on <a href="https://the-decoder.com/">The Decoder</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Database of Malicious Browser Extensions continues to grow!]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Hello everyone, A few months ago I shared my open database of malicious browser extensions. I'm happy to say it has now grown to **over 500 malicious CRX samples**. It started as a small research project, but it's continued to grow as I discover and collect more malicious extensions. My goal is t...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3678731/malware-trojaner-viren/database-of-malicious-browser-extensions-continues-to-grow/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3678731/malware-trojaner-viren/database-of-malicious-browser-extensions-continues-to-grow/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 04:02:59 +0200</pubDate>
<category>⚠️ Malware / Trojaner / Viren</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hello everyone,</p> <p>A few months ago I shared my open database of malicious browser extensions. I'm happy to say it has now grown to **over 500 malicious CRX samples**.</p> <p>It started as a small research project, but it's continued to grow as I discover and collect more malicious extensions. My goal is to make it a useful resource for researchers, students, and anyone interested in browser extension security.</p> <p>One thing I'm working on next is making the data easier to consume in other tools. At the moment I'm considering exposing it in formats such as:</p> <p>* JSON<br> * CSV</p> <p>I'm also thinking about adding things like an API or threat-intelligence style feeds if people think they'd be useful.</p> <p>I'd love to hear your thoughts:</p> <p>* What format would you actually use?<br> * Are there any security tools or platforms you'd like to integrate it with?<br> * Is there any metadata you'd find useful that I'm currently missing?</p> <p>Repository:<br> [<a href="https://github.com/GherardoFiori/MaliciousBrowserExtensions%5C%5D(https://github.com/GherardoFiori/MaliciousBrowserExtensions?utm%5C_source=chatgpt.com)">https://github.com/GherardoFiori/MaliciousBrowserExtensions\](https://github.com/GherardoFiori/MaliciousBrowserExtensions?utm\_source=chatgpt.com)</a></p> <p>**Please remember these are live malicious browser extensions. Handle them with care.**</p> <p>Project:<br> [<a href="https://exterminai.com/%5C%5D(https://exterminai.com/)">https://exterminai.com/\](https://exterminai.com/)</a></p> <p>Any feedback is appreciated. Thanks!</p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/ElBuio"> /u/ElBuio </a> <br> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/MalwareAnalysis/comments/1v04d6m/database_of_malicious_browser_extensions/">[link]</a></span>   <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/MalwareAnalysis/comments/1v04d6m/database_of_malicious_browser_extensions/">[comments]</a></span>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Classifying Tactile Paving Crimes Using D&D Alignment (emf2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Tactile paving (those bobbly bits of pavements you find around crossings) has been with us since the 90s and is now ubiquitous, but it's not working as well as it should for the blind and partially sighted people who need it. Its use is controlled by a government guidance document but this is not...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3678620/it-security-video/classifying-tactile-paving-crimes-using-dd-alignment-emf2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3678620/it-security-video/classifying-tactile-paving-crimes-using-dd-alignment-emf2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 01:47:57 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Tactile paving (those bobbly bits of pavements you find around crossings) has been with us since the 90s and is now ubiquitous, but it's not working as well as it should for the blind and partially sighted people who need it. Its use is controlled by a government guidance document but this is not legally binding and it does not cover lots of features that are now common on our streets. This leads to widespread instances of tactile paving 'crimes', where the paving either doesn't do the job it is supposed to or doesn't follow the guidance, or both. We're going to explore this issue by using the Alignment system from Dungeons &amp; Dragons to classify these different crimes based on their position on the Good/Evil and Lawful/Chaotic axes. We will review photos of tactile paving collected from across the UK (to spot crimes) as well as videos of blind and partially sighted people using it (to understand the jobs it's supposed to do). Hopefully thinking about the problem in this way might help build consensus to one day write some better guidance.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://www.emfcamp.org/schedule/2026/245-classifying-tactile-paving-crimes-using-d-d-alignment]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[💚 Our Family's Electrotech Journey 🌞🏡🔌⛽️🚘️ (emf2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The story of how we went all electric, ditched fossil fuels, disconnected our gas supply and stopped burning stuff, and how you can too.

Our experience of converting a ~100 year old semi-detached house to modern clean living, and electrifying other parts of our lifestyle, such as travelling with...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3678185/it-security-video/our-familys-electrotech-journey-emf2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3678185/it-security-video/our-familys-electrotech-journey-emf2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 17:18:20 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The story of how we went all electric, ditched fossil fuels, disconnected our gas supply and stopped burning stuff, and how you can too.

Our experience of converting a ~100 year old semi-detached house to modern clean living, and electrifying other parts of our lifestyle, such as travelling without flying.

Advice on switching to (and charging) electric vehicles, solar panels and home batteries, insulation, induction hobs and heat pumps. Mistakes made, lessons learned, what we'd do differently next time and how much it saves us.

How to monitor, control and automate your low carbon tech with open energy monitor and home assistant. Tips for making things work together well and play nicely with each other. The perils of cloud integrations and vendors shutting down systems.

Also covering self-built (and bought) air quality monitors for citizen science and environmental monitoring of the changes in air pollution. How to make projects such as Sensor Community and pull the data into your local home management system.

Discover how to be greener, healthier, safer, more resilient/secure, spend less money and have fun geeking out on it along the way.

Learn from our real-world experience in this electrifying talk.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://www.emfcamp.org/schedule/2026/82-our-familys-electrotech-journey]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[KI besteht erstmals Turing-Test – und wirkt menschlicher als echte Menschen]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag KI besteht erstmals Turing-Test – und wirkt menschlicher als echte Menschen erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Erstmals hat eine KI den klassischen Turing-Test bestanden. Ein Modell...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3677419/it-nachrichten/ki-besteht-erstmals-turing-test-und-wirkt-menschlicher-als-echte-menschen/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3677419/it-nachrichten/ki-besteht-erstmals-turing-test-und-wirkt-menschlicher-als-echte-menschen/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 06:02:24 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/18/ki-besteht-turing-test/">KI besteht erstmals Turing-Test – und wirkt menschlicher als echte Menschen</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Erstmals hat eine KI den klassischen Turing-Test bestanden. Ein Modell wurde dabei sogar häufiger für einen Menschen gehalten als echte Personen. Erfolg für die KI, doch was bedeutet das für unseren Umgang mit der Technologie? Kann eine Maschine denken wie ein Mensch? Diese Frage wollte der britische Mathematiker Alan Turing bereits 1950 mit seinem „Imitationsspiel“ beantworten. […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/18/ki-besteht-turing-test/">KI besteht erstmals Turing-Test – und wirkt menschlicher als echte Menschen</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Forscher widerlegen Chemie-Dogma – für bessere Brennstoffzellen]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag Forscher widerlegen Chemie-Dogma – für bessere Brennstoffzellen erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Brennstoffzellen gelten als Schlüsseltechnologie für die Energiewende. Doch teures...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3677418/it-nachrichten/forscher-widerlegen-chemie-dogma-fuer-bessere-brennstoffzellen/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3677418/it-nachrichten/forscher-widerlegen-chemie-dogma-fuer-bessere-brennstoffzellen/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 06:02:22 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/18/doppelatom-katalysatoren/">Forscher widerlegen Chemie-Dogma – für bessere Brennstoffzellen</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Brennstoffzellen gelten als Schlüsseltechnologie für die Energiewende. Doch teures Platin macht sie für den Massenmarkt zu kostspielig. Ein Forscherteam aus Japan hat jetzt mithilfe von KI vielversprechende Ersatzmaterialien identifiziert und dabei ein jahrzehntealtes Chemie-Dogma widerlegt. Ihre Erkenntnis: Doppelatom-Katalysatoren funktionieren nach völlig anderen Regeln als bisher angenommen.  Forscher der Tohoku Universität haben im Rahmen einer systematischen Untersuchung […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/18/doppelatom-katalysatoren/">Forscher widerlegen Chemie-Dogma – für bessere Brennstoffzellen</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[v2.1.214]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[What's changed

Fixed single-segment dir/** allow rules like Edit(src/**) auto-approving writes to nested dir/ directories anywhere in the tree instead of only /dir
Fixed a permission-check bypass affecting commands run in Windows PowerShell 5.1 sessions
Fixed Bash permission checks to fail close...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3677323/downloads/v21214/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3677323/downloads/v21214/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 03:46:25 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾 Downloads</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>What's changed</h2>
<ul>
<li>Fixed single-segment <code>dir/**</code> allow rules like <code>Edit(src/**)</code> auto-approving writes to nested <code>dir/</code> directories anywhere in the tree instead of only <code>&lt;cwd&gt;/dir</code></li>
<li>Fixed a permission-check bypass affecting commands run in Windows PowerShell 5.1 sessions</li>
<li>Fixed Bash permission checks to fail closed on file-descriptor redirect forms that bash parses differently than the permission analyzer</li>
<li>Fixed Bash permission checks misjudging very long commands — commands over 10,000 characters now always prompt instead of running automatically</li>
<li>Fixed Bash permission checks treating zsh variable subscripts and modifiers in <code>[[ ]]</code> comparisons as inert text — these commands now prompt for approval</li>
<li>Fixed Bash permission checks to no longer auto-approve certain <code>help</code> and <code>man</code> commands that could run unsafe options, command substitutions, or backslash paths</li>
<li>Fixed permission prompts on remote sessions that could proceed before the local confirmation dialog</li>
<li>Added the EndConversation tool: Claude can end sessions with highly abusive users or jailbreak attempts, as on claude.ai since 2025 — see <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/research/end-subset-conversations" rel="nofollow">https://www.anthropic.com/research/end-subset-conversations</a></li>
<li>Added a periodic progress heartbeat for long-running tool calls that previously went silent</li>
<li>Added an ISO <code>modified</code> timestamp to memory file frontmatter</li>
<li>Added <code>message.uuid</code>, <code>client_request_id</code>, and <code>tool_source</code> attributes to OpenTelemetry log events for message-level correlation and tool provenance</li>
<li>Added <code>CLAUDE_CODE_OTEL_CONTENT_MAX_LENGTH</code> to configure the 60 KB truncation limit on OpenTelemetry content attributes</li>
<li>Added reasoning effort to the <code>subagentStatusLine</code> payload, so custom agent rows can render model and effort</li>
<li>Added permission prompts for <code>docker</code> commands (including the Podman <code>docker</code> shim) carrying daemon-redirect flags (<code>--url</code>, <code>--connection</code>, <code>--identity</code>, and Podman's remote mode) that previously ran without one</li>
<li>Fixed a crash when a GrowthBook feature evaluates to null, and a bug where a malformed flag payload could wipe the cached feature flags</li>
<li>Fixed Bash tool killing the Claude session when a <code>pkill -f</code> pattern accidentally matched the CLI's own process (Linux)</li>
<li>Fixed unbounded memory growth when <code>--settings</code> points at a device file or multi-GB file; oversized (&gt;2 MiB) settings files now fail at startup with a clear error</li>
<li>Fixed streaming turns failing with "Socket is closed" behind corporate proxies on Windows</li>
<li>Fixed stream-json output truncation at exit for slow-reading SDK/pipeline consumers; the exit drain now scales with queued bytes instead of a flat 2s cap</li>
<li>Fixed scheduled tasks refusing their own configured prompt as untrusted input — the fired prompt is now delivered as the session's assigned task</li>
<li>Fixed PowerShell tool commands hanging until timeout when a child process waited on standard input (Windows)</li>
<li>Fixed Python scripts under the PowerShell tool crashing with UnicodeDecodeError when reading non-UTF-8 data from standard input (Windows)</li>
<li>Fixed Python scripts run via the PowerShell tool crashing with UnicodeEncodeError on non-ASCII output, and PowerShell 7 error messages containing raw ANSI escape sequences (Windows)</li>
<li>Fixed the PowerShell tool reporting <code>where.exe</code>, <code>fc.exe</code>, and <code>diff.exe</code> as errors when they return a valid negative answer (Windows)</li>
<li>Fixed <code>&gt;</code> and <code>&gt;&gt;</code> under the PowerShell tool on Windows PowerShell 5.1 writing UTF-16LE files that other tools couldn't read as UTF-8</li>
<li>Fixed a displaced background daemon deleting its successor's control socket on shutdown, which made the next client kill the healthy replacement daemon</li>
<li>Fixed background sessions parked with <code>←</code> or <code>/background</code> and left idle keeping the background daemon and a worker process alive indefinitely</li>
<li>Fixed completed background sessions being impossible to remove via <code>claude rm</code> or the agent view once the background service had gone idle</li>
<li>Fixed background sessions dispatched from a non-git folder being impossible to delete from the agents view</li>
<li>Fixed reopening a stopped background session failing to restore its saved conversation when an unreadable folder exists in the session store</li>
<li>Fixed the Remote Control "session ready" push notification firing for sessions where Remote Control was not explicitly enabled</li>
<li>Fixed <code>/install-github-app</code> and the <code>/mcp</code> settings menu being blocked in agent-view sessions — they're now refused only in background sessions with no terminal attached</li>
<li>Fixed plugins enabled via the <code>--settings</code> CLI flag not loading (regression since v2.1.181)</li>
<li>Fixed feature flags going stale in long-running sessions after the OAuth token rotates</li>
<li>Fixed <code>/ultrareview</code> refusing to run in repos with no merge base — it now offers to review all tracked files</li>
<li>Fixed <code>claude update</code> and <code>claude doctor</code> hanging silently, and the <code>/status</code> System diagnostics section going blank, when a shell-config path is a directory</li>
<li>Fixed memory frontmatter values being silently truncated at an inline <code>#</code> when memory files are saved</li>
<li>Fixed session cost and token telemetry double-counting on streams that emit multiple cumulative <code>message_delta</code> frames</li>
<li>Fixed a spurious "check your network" warning that appeared while the advisor was thinking</li>
<li>Fixed hooks with exit code 2 not blocking as documented when the hook's stdout JSON fails schema validation</li>
<li>Fixed OTel log events emitted outside the turn's async context missing the interaction span's trace context</li>
<li>Fixed MCP transient errors during prompts/resources refresh clearing the server's slash commands and resources</li>
<li>Improved the <code>claude rc</code> workspace-trust error in the home directory to say trust there is never saved and to suggest running from a project directory</li>
<li>Changed single-segment <code>dir/**</code> hook <code>if:</code> conditions to match only <code>&lt;cwd&gt;/dir</code>; write <code>**/dir/**</code> for any-depth matching. <code>deny</code>/<code>ask</code> permission rules keep their any-depth match.</li>
<li>Changed <code>file</code> commands using <code>-m</code>/<code>--magic-file</code> or <code>-f</code>/<code>--files-from</code> to require permission instead of being auto-allowed as read-only</li>
<li>Changed keep-alive connection pooling to disable after a stale-connection error, so retries open a fresh socket</li>
<li>Changed SessionStart hooks to report source <code>"fork"</code> when a session begins as a fork instead of <code>"resume"</code></li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Das sind die größten Städte der Welt – wo warst du schon?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag Das sind die größten Städte der Welt – wo warst du schon? erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Nie zuvor lebten so viele Menschen in Städten wie heute, und die meisten der größten Met...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3676848/it-security-nachrichten/das-sind-die-groessten-staedte-der-welt-wo-warst-du-schon/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3676848/it-security-nachrichten/das-sind-die-groessten-staedte-der-welt-wo-warst-du-schon/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 20:53:43 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/17/groessten-staedte-der-welt-2/">Das sind die größten Städte der Welt – wo warst du schon?</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Nie zuvor lebten so viele Menschen in Städten wie heute, und die meisten der größten Metropolen der Welt wachsen weiter. Europa ist längst abgehängt, dafür dominiert ein anderer Kontinent das Ranking. Wir verraten in diesem Artikel die zehn bevölkerungsreichsten Städte der Welt. Die Landflucht ist nicht nur in Deutschland real. Auf der ganzen Welt leben […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/17/groessten-staedte-der-welt-2/">Das sind die größten Städte der Welt – wo warst du schon?</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[PR #37510 spinner verification]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Direct OpenCode Drive capture of the active thinking spinner for PR #37510.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3676483/downloads/pr-37510-spinner-verification/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3676483/downloads/pr-37510-spinner-verification/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 17:32:37 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾 Downloads</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Direct OpenCode Drive capture of the active thinking spinner for PR <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4912530081" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/issues/37510" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/anomalyco/opencode/pull/37510/hovercard" href="https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/pull/37510">#37510</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[China creates World AI body with Russia and 27 others, but without US]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[China has created an international organization to set standards and introduce regulation for AI, inviting 28 other countries to join — but the US, a leading AI powerhouse is not part it.



The World Artificial Intelligence Cooperation Organization (WAICO) was established by 29 countries, includ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3676206/it-security-nachrichten/china-creates-world-ai-body-with-russia-and-27-others-but-without-us/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3676206/it-security-nachrichten/china-creates-world-ai-body-with-russia-and-27-others-but-without-us/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 15:38:08 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">China has created an international organization to set standards and introduce regulation for AI, inviting 28 other countries to join — but the US, a leading AI powerhouse is not part it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The World Artificial Intelligence Cooperation Organization (WAICO) was established by 29 countries, including China, Russia and Brazil, <a href="https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/xw/zyxw/202607/t20260717_11984766.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">at a ceremony in Shanghai, China</a>, on July 16. Notably absent are the US, the European Union and its member states, the UK, Japan and South Korea.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Chinese AI companies have made a concerted effort to <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4087450/the-geopolitics-of-ai-and-robotics-china-the-us-and-japan.html">provide an alternative to US dominance</a>. While the US is clearly ahead, Chinese enterprises are looking to narrow the gap in various areas: <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4197743/thinking-machines-offers-enterprises-a-us-alternative-in-open-weight-ai.html">the open-weight model market</a>, <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4170818/what-happens-when-chinas-ai-catches-up-to-mythos.html">AI cyber protection</a> and <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4149313/chinas-use-of-open%E2%80%91source-ai-threatens-the-us-lead-in-ai-development-us-commission-warns.html">open source AI</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">WAICO has been some years in development and has been designed to set some universal guidelines in AI. Researchers say <a href="https://arxiv.org/html/2606.23860v1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">WAICO differs in three ways</a> from other initiatives to create global AI organizations: membership open to any sovereign state, there is no regime-type test for entry, and its agenda is built around development and the global capability divide.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The signing ceremony to create WAICO comes just days after Demis Hassabis, CEO of Google DeepMind, called on the <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4197497/deepmind-ceo-pushes-for-ai-industry-self-regulation.html">US to take a lead in global AI regulation</a>. “The US is well-positioned to take the first step in developing such a framework. It could establish a new Standards Body modelled on a federally overseen public-private partnership or self-regulatory organization, much like the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), with a board that includes independent leading technical experts and open-source representatives,” Hassabis wrote.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>This article first appeared on <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4198354/china-russia-and-27-others-create-world-ai-body-without-us.html">Computerworld</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[China, Russia, and 27 others create World AI body, without US]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[China has created an international organization to set standards and introduce regulation for AI, inviting 28 other countries to join — but the US, a leading AI powerhouse is not part it.



The World Artificial Intelligence Cooperation Organization (WAICO) was established by 29 countries, includ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3676190/it-nachrichten/china-russia-and-27-others-create-world-ai-body-without-us/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3676190/it-nachrichten/china-russia-and-27-others-create-world-ai-body-without-us/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 15:32:58 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">China has created an international organization to set standards and introduce regulation for AI, inviting 28 other countries to join — but the US, a leading AI powerhouse is not part it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The World Artificial Intelligence Cooperation Organization (WAICO) was established by 29 countries, including China, Russia and Brazil, <a href="https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/xw/zyxw/202607/t20260717_11984766.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">at a ceremony in Shanghai, China</a>, on July 16. Notably absent are the US, the European Union and its member states, the UK, Japan and South Korea.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Chinese AI companies have made a concerted effort to <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4087450/the-geopolitics-of-ai-and-robotics-china-the-us-and-japan.html">provide an alternative to US dominance</a>. While the US is clearly ahead, Chinese enterprises are looking to narrow the gap in various areas: <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4197743/thinking-machines-offers-enterprises-a-us-alternative-in-open-weight-ai.html">the open-weight model market</a>, <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4170818/what-happens-when-chinas-ai-catches-up-to-mythos.html">AI cyber protection</a> and <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4149313/chinas-use-of-open%E2%80%91source-ai-threatens-the-us-lead-in-ai-development-us-commission-warns.html">open source AI</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">WAICO has been some years in development and has been designed to set some universal guidelines in AI. Researchers say <a href="https://arxiv.org/html/2606.23860v1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">WAICO differs in three ways</a> from other initiatives to create global AI organizations: membership open to any sovereign state, there is no regime-type test for entry, and its agenda is built around development and the global capability divide.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The signing ceremony to create WAICO comes just days after Demis Hassabis, CEO of Google DeepMind, called on the <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4197497/deepmind-ceo-pushes-for-ai-industry-self-regulation.html">US to take a lead in global AI regulation</a>. “The US is well-positioned to take the first step in developing such a framework. It could establish a new Standards Body modelled on a federally overseen public-private partnership or self-regulatory organization, much like the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), with a board that includes independent leading technical experts and open-source representatives,” Hassabis wrote.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple TV Confirms Stillwater Season 5 Release Date, All Episodes Arrive This August]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple TV has confirmed the release date for Stillwater season 5, giving families another collection of gentle stories focused on emotions, friendship, and everyday challenges. The animated series will return globally on Friday, August 21, 2026, with all five new episodes arriving together.



The...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3676102/ios-mac-os/apple-tv-confirms-stillwater-season-5-release-date-all-episodes-arrive-this-august/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3676102/ios-mac-os/apple-tv-confirms-stillwater-season-5-release-date-all-episodes-arrive-this-august/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 14:54:12 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple TV has confirmed the release date for Stillwater season 5, giving families another collection of gentle stories focused on emotions, friendship, and everyday challenges. The animated series will return globally on Friday, August 21, 2026, with all five new episodes arriving together.



The new season continues the award-winning story of siblings Karl, Addy, and Michael, whose wise panda neighbor helps them understand their feelings and look at difficult situations from a calmer perspective. Viewers can currently stream the first four seasons on Apple TV.



Here are the main details about the upcoming season:




Release date: Friday, August 21, 2026



Number of episodes: Five



Release schedule: All episodes will arrive together



Genre: Animated kids and family series



Start airing date: August 21, 2026



Finish date: August 21, 2026



Where to watch: Apple TV



Main voice cast: James Sie, Eva Ariel Binder, Tucker Chandler, and Judah Mackey




What is Stillwater season 5 about?







Stillwater follows Karl, Addy, and Michael as they deal with problems that feel familiar to young viewers, including disappointment, uncertainty, disagreements, and fear of trying something new.



Their neighbor Stillwater listens to their concerns and often shares a thoughtful story that helps them see the situation differently. His advice encourages the children to slow down, understand their emotions, and find their own way forward.



Season 5 will continue this familiar format through five new adventures. Each episode will focus on the children learning more about themselves, their relationships, and the world around them. The series remains inspired by Jon J Muth’s bestselling Zen book collection.



The first look at the season shows Stillwater returning alongside the three siblings, suggesting that the new episodes will maintain the peaceful visual style and warm storytelling that have defined the show since its 2020 debut.



There are currently no major plot details or episode descriptions available, so viewers will need to wait for a trailer or further announcements to learn which specific challenges Karl, Addy, and Michael will face.




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zz1GkcvkT1g




FAQs



When is the Stillwater season 5 release date?



Stillwater season 5 will premiere globally on Apple TV on Friday, August 21, 2026.



How many episodes are in Stillwater season 5?



The fifth season contains five new episodes. Apple TV will release all five episodes on the premiere date, allowing families to watch the full season immediately.



Will Stillwater season 5 release weekly?



No. All five episodes will become available together on August 21, 2026.



Who voices Stillwater in the animated series?



James Sie voices Stillwater. The main cast also includes Eva Ariel Binder as Addy, Tucker Chandler as Michael, and Judah Mackey as Karl.



Is Stillwater suitable for children?



Yes. Stillwater is an animated kids and family series that focuses on emotional awareness, mindfulness, kindness, and solving everyday problems.



Where can I watch the previous seasons?



All four previous seasons are available to stream on Apple TV before season 5 arrives.



Is Stillwater season 5 the final season?



Apple TV has announced the fifth season but has not officially described it as the final season. Its future beyond these five episodes remains unconfirmed.



Apple TV costs $12.99 per month in the United States after a seven-day free trial. With every new episode arriving on the same day, families can watch Stillwater season 5 at their own pace from August 21. Do you plan to watch the new season? Let us know in the comments.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Nintendo arbeitet laut Patent an Dock für Switch und Switch 2]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Ein neues Patent für Switch und Switch 2 erleichtert den Betrieb beider Konsolen künftig womöglich: Das Universal-Dock erkennt das eingesetzte Modell automatisch und passt Funktionen entsprechend an.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675873/it-nachrichten/nintendo-arbeitet-laut-patent-an-dock-fuer-switch-und-switch-2/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675873/it-nachrichten/nintendo-arbeitet-laut-patent-an-dock-fuer-switch-und-switch-2/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 13:18:12 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ein neues Patent für Switch und Switch 2 erleichtert den Betrieb beider Konsolen künftig womöglich: Das Universal-Dock erkennt das eingesetzte Modell automatisch und passt Funktionen entsprechend an.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Why technology leaders are losing the AI conversation to the people who report to them]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I keep seeing a version of the same scene. A CEO has a question about AI. It is a real question, the kind that will shape where the company spends the next two years. The CEO does not bring it to the CIO. They bring it to a data leader two levels down, or to a vendor who presented at a conference...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675833/it-nachrichten/why-technology-leaders-are-losing-the-ai-conversation-to-the-people-who-report-to-them/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675833/it-nachrichten/why-technology-leaders-are-losing-the-ai-conversation-to-the-people-who-report-to-them/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 13:03:31 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I keep seeing a version of the same scene. A CEO has a question about AI. It is a real question, the kind that will shape where the company spends the next two years. The CEO does not bring it to the CIO. They bring it to a data leader two levels down, or to a vendor who presented at a conference, or to an AI specialist a board member recommended. The CIO finds out the strategy is forming when a slide shows up that they did not build. By then, the direction is already half-set, and the CIO is being asked to react to it rather than shape it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I want to be precise about what is happening, because it is easy to misread. The CIO has not been removed from anything. Title intact, budget intact, seat at the table intact. What has changed is quieter. On one of the most consequential technology conversations the company will have this decade, the CIO is being routed around. The work still flows through them eventually. The thinking no longer starts with them.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I have watched this happen to capable people who would have given the CEO a better answer than the person who was asked. That is what makes it worth naming. This is not a competence gap. It is a positioning gap, and positioning gaps close in the wrong direction if you ignore them long enough.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How the routing actually starts</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The routing does not begin with a decision to exclude anyone. It begins with a CEO who is anxious about AI and looking for someone who sounds certain. AI is moving fast enough that executives feel the pressure to have a point of view before they have earned one. That pressure usually arrives secondhand, from a board member or a peer on the golf course describing what is working at their company. So the CEO goes looking for someone who will confirm the answer they already want to hear, and they keep going back to whoever gives it to them.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Here is where many technology leaders lose the thread. For years, the safe posture in the CIO seat was measured caution. You raised the risks, you flagged the integration cost, you asked who owns the data and what the compliance exposure looks like. That posture built credibility in an era when the failure mode was moving too fast on technology nobody understood. With AI, the same posture reads as drag. A CEO who is being told by three vendors that “the future is already here” does not want to hear why they should slow down and be cautious. They hear caution as losing the race, and they go find a point of view somewhere else.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The data leaders, vendors and specialists who get the call are not necessarily more capable. They are more available with a confident answer. A vendor’s whole job is to arrive with conviction. A data scientist who has shipped one impressive model carries more apparent authority on AI, in that moment, than a CIO who runs the entire estate but talks about AI the way they talk about every other risk. The CEO is not weighing depth against depth. They are weighing the person who said yes against the person who said it depends.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Once that pattern sets, it compounds. The CEO who got a satisfying answer from the data leader goes back to the data leader. The vendor who shaped the first conversation gets invited into the second. Each loop the CIO is not in makes the next one easier to run without them. The org chart still says the CIO owns technology strategy. The actual conversation has relocated.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What it costs before anyone notices</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The cost shows up late, which is exactly why it is dangerous. For a while nothing looks broken. The CIO is still delivering. The AI initiatives are still landing on their plate to execute. The damage is happening upstream, in the room where the bets get made, and the CIO is not in that room.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I have seen what arrives downstream when the strategy was set without the person who has to run it. A model gets championed that the data cannot actually support. A vendor commitment gets made that locks the company into an architecture the CIO would have flagged in the first meeting. An agent gets deployed inside a business unit, with executive blessing, and the CIO inherits accountability for it months later without ever having shaped how it was governed. The recent IBM finding that <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4182288/cios-are-being-held-accountable-for-ai-they-dont-fully-control-ibm-study-finds.html">CIOs are increasingly held accountable for AI they do not fully control</a> is the visible end of this. The invisible front end is the conversation the CIO was routed around, the one where the accountability got created in the first place.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What I find most corrosive is what it does to the CIO’s standing over time. Every initiative the CIO executes but did not shape reinforces a story about what the CIO is for. They become the person who runs the technology other people decided on. That is a fine description of an order taker and a poor description of a strategic leader, and CEOs do not promote, fund, or defend order takers when budgets tighten. The routing-around does not just cost the company a worse AI strategy. It quietly recasts the CIO as the implementer of everyone else’s thinking, and that recasting is hard to reverse once the executive team has internalized it.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What the leaders who stayed in the conversation did</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The technology leaders I have watched hold their position on AI did one thing first. They stopped leading with caution and started leading with a point of view. Not a reckless one. A real, defensible position on where AI creates value in their specific business and where it does not, delivered with the same conviction the vendors bring, before the CEO went looking elsewhere for it. They made themselves the person with the clearest answer, which is the role the routing-around was filling with someone else.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That requires giving up a posture that felt safe for a long time. The CIOs who made the shift accepted that on AI, being right and cautious is worth less than being early and directional. They formed a view ahead of being asked. They walked into the CEO’s office with where we should place our AI bets and why, rather than waiting to be handed someone else’s bets to pressure-test. The difference is whether you are the author of the strategy or its editor, and CEOs route around editors.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">They also changed how they talk about risk. Instead of presenting risk as the reason to slow down, they folded it into the recommendation. The data is not ready for that use case, so here is the use case where it is ready, and here is what we do in parallel to unlock the first one. That framing keeps the CIO inside the conversation as the person making AI happen responsibly, rather than the person standing outside it explaining why it is hard. Same expertise, opposite effect on whether the CEO keeps coming back.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of this is about pushing the data leaders and specialists out. The strongest CIOs I know pulled those people closer and brought them into the room under their own framing, so that when the CEO wanted the specialist’s input, it arrived through the CIO rather than around them. They made themselves the orchestrator of the AI conversation instead of one of its casualties.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If you are a technology leader right now, the question worth sitting with is not whether you are good at AI. You probably are. The question is whether the most important AI conversations in your company are still starting with you, or whether you have quietly become the person they get handed to after the thinking is done. That answer is set in rooms you may not be in, and the only way to find out is to ask who your CEO called the last three times AI came up. If the answer is not you, the role is still yours. The conversation has already started leaving.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[OpenAI Is Selling $230 Codex Micro Hardware Product With Work Louder]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[OpenAI recently teamed up with Work Louder to release a physical tool for developers. Reports show OpenAI is selling $230 Codex Micro hardware product units on its website now. The keyboard brings your digital agent workspace straight to your desk. It helps users manage active chats and keep trac...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675822/ios-mac-os/openai-is-selling-230-codex-micro-hardware-product-with-work-louder/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675822/ios-mac-os/openai-is-selling-230-codex-micro-hardware-product-with-work-louder/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 12:53:59 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[OpenAI recently teamed up with Work Louder to release a physical tool for developers. Reports show OpenAI is selling $230 Codex Micro hardware product units on its website now. The keyboard brings your digital agent workspace straight to your desk. It helps users manage active chats and keep track of tasks through live lighting feedback. Buyers can pick between a clicky or silent switch version when ordering the device.



The device offers physical controls for common coding workflow tasks



The gadget maps your most used actions to physical buttons. This release shows its push into the physical world of artificial intelligence tools.



It connects directly with the desktop app to provide high customization. You can reassign any key or change how the agent buttons work to fit your specific needs. Each key lights up with a status indicator so you can see if the program is thinking, running, waiting, or done before you even open a chat window.



Here is a look at the specific features built into this product:




Trigger skills instantly: Users can flick the built-in joystick to launch common workflows. This includes reviewing a pull request, debugging a coding error, or refactoring text.



Keep core actions close: The command keys give you a dedicated shortcut for accepting, rejecting, or starting a new chat.



Set the brainpower: You can turn a physical dial to adjust the reasoning level of the AI on the fly. This lets you stay fast for simple tasks or turn it up for heavier thinking.




This hardware release marks a big shift in how developers interact with digital models. Moving software controls to a physical keypad saves time by reducing screen switching. It also makes working with smart agents feel much more natural and direct.



The release points to a future where physical devices bridge the gap between human input and complex background processing.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Thinking Machines Lab drops Inkling & Meta’s Muse Spark 1.1]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: IBM Technology - Bewertung: 10x - Views:96 Visit Mixture of Experts podcast page to get more AI content → https://ibm.biz/~KwWVYq9Sw

Is customizable intelligence the future of AI? This week on Mixture of Experts, Tim Hwang is joined by Aaron Baughman, Chris Hay and Merve Unuvar to analyz...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675707/it-security-video/thinking-machines-lab-drops-inkling-metas-muse-spark-11/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675707/it-security-video/thinking-machines-lab-drops-inkling-metas-muse-spark-11/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 12:17:39 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: IBM Technology - Bewertung: 10x - Views:96 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/8rGYGFmytQs?autoplay=1&origin=http://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p>Visit Mixture of Experts podcast page to get more AI content → https://ibm.biz/~KwWVYq9Sw<br />
<br />
Is customizable intelligence the future of AI? This week on Mixture of Experts, Tim Hwang is joined by Aaron Baughman, Chris Hay and Merve Unuvar to analyze Thinking Machines’ first model release, Inkling. Next, Meta makes its comeback with Muse Spark 1.1, positioning itself as the most economical model built for scale. Then, OpenAI’s GPT-5.6 Sol achieves an 8% score on ARC-AGI-3, sparking debate about if we’re approaching AGI. Finally, we dissect Anthropic’s latest paper on the “J-space”—claiming to reveal a subconscious-like layer inside Claude. <br />
<br />
All that and more on this week’s Mixture of Experts.<br />
<br />
00:00 – Introduction<br />
00:50 – Thinking Machines Inkling model release<br />
19:48 – GPT-5.6 Sol ARC-AGI-3 performance<br />
29:03 – Anthropic’s J-space consciousness debate<br />
<br />
The opinions expressed in this podcast are solely those of the participants and do not necessarily reflect the views of IBM or any other organization or entity.<br />
<br />
AI news moves fast. Sign up for a monthly newsletter for AI updates from IBM → https://ibm.biz/~x704WfT0B<br />
#claudeai #openai #machinelearning<br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Best Identity Threat Detection & Response (ITDR) Solutions: Our Top Picks by Use Case (2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[There’s no universal best ITDR a 60-person M365 shop, an Okta-first scaleup, and a hybrid-AD enterprise face different identity attacks and need different defenders. So this guide matches eight ITDR solutions to the situations where each genuinely wins. The one-line version: Microsoft Defender fo...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675560/it-security-nachrichten/best-identity-threat-detection-response-itdr-solutions-our-top-picks-by-use-case-2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675560/it-security-nachrichten/best-identity-threat-detection-response-itdr-solutions-our-top-picks-by-use-case-2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 11:09:44 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There’s no universal best ITDR a 60-person M365 shop, an Okta-first scaleup, and a hybrid-AD enterprise face different identity attacks and need different defenders. So this guide matches eight ITDR solutions to the situations where each genuinely wins. The one-line version: Microsoft Defender for Identity is the default where AD and E5 already live, Huntress […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cyberpress.org/itdr-solutions-by-business-size/">Best Identity Threat Detection &amp; Response (ITDR) Solutions: Our Top Picks by Use Case (2026)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cyberpress.org/">Cyber Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[ChatGPT Work: OpenAI baut seinen Chatbot in einen Büro-Agenten um]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag ChatGPT Work: OpenAI baut seinen Chatbot in einen Büro-Agenten um erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
OpenAI hat mit ChatGPT Work einen KI-Agenten vorgestellt, der E-Mails lesen, Dok...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675556/it-security-nachrichten/chatgpt-work-openai-baut-seinen-chatbot-in-einen-buero-agenten-um/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675556/it-security-nachrichten/chatgpt-work-openai-baut-seinen-chatbot-in-einen-buero-agenten-um/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 11:09:39 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/17/chatgpt-work-openai-ki-agent/">ChatGPT Work: OpenAI baut seinen Chatbot in einen Büro-Agenten um</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>OpenAI hat mit ChatGPT Work einen KI-Agenten vorgestellt, der E-Mails lesen, Dokumente erstellen und komplette Arbeitsabläufe automatisieren soll. Damit verabschiedet sich das Unternehmen zunehmend von einem Chatbot für alle und richtet sich vor allem an Unternehmenskunden. Doch erste Nutzerreaktionen zeigen: Zwischen Versprechen und Realität klafft noch eine Lücke. Eine kommentierende Analyse. Was ist ChatGPT Work? […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/17/chatgpt-work-openai-ki-agent/">ChatGPT Work: OpenAI baut seinen Chatbot in einen Büro-Agenten um</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Switch 1 & 2: Nintendo arbeitet womöglich an smartem Universal-Dock]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Ein aufgetauchtes Patent deutet darauf hin, dass Nintendo an einem universellen Dock arbeiten könnte, das sowohl die Switch 2 als auch das Vorgängermodell unterstützt. Die Hardware soll die eingesteckte Konsole automatisch erkennen und die Leistung anpassen.			(Weiter lesen)]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675439/it-security-nachrichten/switch-1-2-nintendo-arbeitet-womoeglich-an-smartem-universal-dock/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675439/it-security-nachrichten/switch-1-2-nintendo-arbeitet-womoeglich-an-smartem-universal-dock/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 10:23:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="https://winfuture.de/news,160046.html"><img hspace="5" border="0" align="left" alt="Gaming, Nintendo, Technologie, Spielekonsole, Videospiele, Unterhaltungselektronik, Nintendo Switch 2, USB-C, Handheld, Webcam, Dock, Dockingstation, Docking Station, Joy-Con-Controller, Next-Gen-Konsole, Docking-Station, TV-Bildschirm, Hybridkonsole, Neuerscheinung" width="1920" height="1080" src="https://i.wfcdn.de/teaser/1920/83480.jpg"></a>
			Ein aufgetauchtes Patent deutet darauf hin, dass Nintendo an einem universellen Dock arbeiten könnte, das sowohl die <a href="https://winfuture.de/special/nintendo-switch/" title="Nintendo Switch 2 Special">Switch 2</a> als auch das Vorgängermodell unterstützt. Die Hardware soll die eingesteckte Konsole automatisch erkennen und die Leistung anpassen.			(<a href="https://winfuture.de/news,160046.html">Weiter lesen</a>)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Confused Deputy: Google IdP Universal Account Takeover via Device Code Flow Hijacking]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[TL;DRThis one started from setting up the YouTube app on my PS5. The device authorization grant (RFC 8628) it uses, the flow TVs, consoles, and CLIs rely on when they don’t have a browser of their own, turned out to hide two stacked bugs in Google’s implementation.Two bugs stack together. First, ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675347/hacking/confused-deputy-google-idp-universal-account-takeover-via-device-code-flow-hijacking/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675347/hacking/confused-deputy-google-idp-universal-account-takeover-via-device-code-flow-hijacking/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 09:23:37 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>TL;DR</h3><p>This one started from setting up the YouTube app on my PS5. The device authorization grant (RFC 8628) it uses, the flow TVs, consoles, and CLIs rely on when they don’t have a browser of their own, turned out to hide two stacked bugs in Google’s implementation.</p><p>Two bugs stack together. First, the session that anchors a device-code sign-in is fully transferable: copy the sign-in URL from one browser to another and the second browser’s login satisfies the first device’s poll. Second, the authorization server never binds client_id and scope to the device_code server-side, so both can be swapped in the URL after the fact. Chain the two together with the prompt=none parameter and any link, opened by a victim who has ever used "Sign in with Google" anywhere, silently hands over an access token for an arbitrary Google-registered client, no click, no consent screen, no 2FA prompt, almost no trace in the victim's account activity.</p><p>Reported to Google’s VRP on Feb 25, 2026, initially closed twice as “won’t fix”: social engineering, reopened after a one-click PoC, fixed by Mar 28, 2026, and rewarded $13,337. Details on that back-and-forth are in the <a href="https://weirdmachine64.github.io/research/google-oauth-device-code-hijacking.html#9-disclosure-timeline">disclosure timeline</a> below.</p><h3>1. Intro</h3><p>Most of the well-known attacks on OAuth go after the client or the resource server: a malicious app, an open redirect, a signing-algorithm mix-up. They leave the authorization server itself alone, because it’s the one party in the protocol that’s supposed to be unshakeable, the thing every other trust decision is anchored to. This is a story about going after that assumption directly, in the one corner of OAuth that’s explicitly designed to let the login happen on a completely different screen: the device authorization grant.</p><p>It started as a mundane afternoon setting up a TV app on a game console, and it ended with a way to silently take over accounts on virtually any site that offers “Sign in with Google.” Getting from one to the other took two separate findings stacked on top of each other, a rejected report, and a fix to the fix. What follows is that story, roughly in the order it actually happened, blockers included.</p><h3>2. The Device Authorization Grant</h3><p>Most OAuth flows assume the device asking for access has a browser sitting right there to redirect through. RFC 8628 exists for the case where it doesn’t: a smart TV, a games console, a headless CLI. The shape is different from the usual redirect dance:</p><ol><li>The device calls the authorization server directly (POST /device/code) and gets back a device_code (secret, stays on the device) and a user_code (short, shown on screen).</li><li>The device displays the user_code and tells the user to go to a URL, google.com/device in Google's case, on <em>any other</em> browser.</li><li>The user opens that URL on their phone or laptop, types the code, signs in, and consents.</li><li>Meanwhile the device has been polling POST /token with its device_code. Once the user finishes step 3, the next poll returns an access token.</li></ol><p>The whole point of the design is that the device and the browser doing the authenticating can be, and usually are, two completely different pieces of hardware. That’s also exactly what makes this flow interesting to attack: the protocol <em>already</em> expects the login to happen somewhere else. The only thing holding the model together is that the “somewhere else” has to be a browser <em>the legitimate device owner</em> is sitting at.</p><p>That’s the assumption. The rest of this write-up is what happened when I went looking for the place where Google’s implementation stops enforcing it.</p><h3>3. Setting Up YouTube TV on a PS5</h3><p>I was setting up the YouTube app on my PS5, ordinary first-run setup. The console has no keyboard and no way to type a password comfortably with a controller, so it does the sensible thing: it shows a short user_code on screen and tells you to go sign in on your phone instead. I typed the code into google.com/device, signed into Google, approved the consent screen, and a few seconds later the PS5 was logged in.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/0*qmQssZXzIn_0kJeh.png"><figcaption><em>The YouTube TV “Add your Google Account” screen: a QR code and a short user_code, with instructions to finish sign-in on a phone.</em></figcaption></figure><p>Nothing about that felt unusual as a user, but the flow itself was intriguing: a screen with no keyboard asking me to authenticate on a completely separate device, and coming back logged in seconds later. That disconnect between where I typed my password and where the session actually landed is what made me want to look at it more closely. Behind the scenes, that’s:</p><ul><li>POST https://oauth2.googleapis.com/device/code → device_code + user_code.</li><li>The PS5 polling POST https://oauth2.googleapis.com/token with that device_code.</li><li>My phone’s browser walking through https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/v2/auth?… to finalize consent once I typed the code and signed in.</li><li>The PS5’s next poll returning an access token.</li></ul><p>Standard, boring, RFC-compliant. The interesting part is what that accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/v2/auth URL is actually carrying, and what happens if you don't treat it as disposable. That question is exactly what kicked off everything that follows.</p><h3>4. The Transferable Session</h3><p>The obvious question with any flow where “the state lives in a URL” is: what happens if you just move the URL? If the entire sign-in step for a device_code can be handed to someone else, then whoever finishes that sign-in step ends up logged into <em>my</em> device, not theirs.</p><p>RFC 8628 §5.4 anticipates exactly this and tells implementers not to let it happen: the whole security model of the flow depends on the user completing verification on a device they’re <em>not</em> about to lose control of.</p><p>I started a fresh device flow on the PS5, walked through google.com/device on a laptop, and at the consent screen copied the resulting URL into a second browser. That failed outright: no session for the second browser to pick up.</p><p>But the device-code page asks for an email address <em>before</em> showing consent. Entering one forwards the browser to a different endpoint entirely: a <em>challenge</em> page at accounts.google.com/v3/signin/challenge/…, carrying a new parameter, TL=APouJz6T…. Sending <em>that</em> URL to a second browser worked. The second browser prompted a completely normal Google sign-in. Seconds after logging in, that account showed up on the PS5.</p><p>TL is an encrypted blob carrying the session state, practically certain to be the device_code, or something that resolves to it, given that it's the only thing left in the URL that could anchor the poll back to a specific device.</p><p><strong>Vulnerability #1: the device-code sign-in session is transferable via URL.</strong> RFC 8628 explicitly says it shouldn’t be. Send the link, get the account.</p><p>That’s a real account takeover, but a narrow one. YouTube TV’s scopes are capped by design, and that cap is the wall I hit next.</p><h3>5. Breaking the Scope Fence</h3><p>A YouTube TV account takeover is real, but Google fences the device flow to a short, deliberately low-risk scope allowlist. Per <a href="https://developers.google.com/identity/protocols/oauth2/limited-input-device">Google’s own docs</a>: <em>“This OAuth 2.0 flow supports a limited set of scopes.”</em> The complete list:</p><ul><li>openid, email, profile</li><li>youtube, youtube.readonly</li><li>drive.appdata, drive.file (app-scoped Drive only, not full Drive)</li></ul><p>No Gmail, no full Drive, no cloud-platform, no compute. The access token I got only worked against a YouTube TV–internal API: enough to like a video or subscribe to a channel. Not exactly a headline bug.</p><p>So I looked again at the transferable challenge URL:</p><pre>accounts.google.com/v3/signin/challenge/…<br>  ?TL=APouJz6T…              &lt;- encrypted session state<br>  &amp;response_type=none<br>  &amp;client_id=861556708454-…   &lt;- YouTube TV<br>  &amp;scope=…                    &lt;- YouTube scopes</pre><p>Two things stand out. response_type=none means this isn't a normal code/token redirect: there's nothing coming back to a callback at all. And there is <strong>no </strong><strong>redirect_uri anywhere in the URL</strong>. The entire boundary that OAuth normally relies on to pin where a grant goes is simply absent from this endpoint, because the grant never gets delivered through the browser; it gets delivered out-of-band, over the device's /token poll.</p><p>The only thing anchoring the session is TL. client_id and scope are just along for the ride in the query string. So: keep TL, swap client_id for a different application, and see which client the authorization server ends up authenticating.</p><p>I scripted the device-code issuance, took the resulting URL, and changed client_id from YouTube TV to Google's own <strong>Cloud SDK</strong> client, with scope changed to cloud-platform, compute, appengine.admin. The consent screen that came back said <strong>Google Cloud SDK</strong>, listing the elevated scopes. Approving it, my polling script, still polling with the <em>original</em> YouTube TV device_code, got back a token on its next call. Inspecting it: cloud-platform, compute, appengine.admin. Not YouTube.</p><p><strong>Vulnerability #2: the server never validates that the </strong><strong>client_id and </strong><strong>scope in the authorization URL match what the </strong><strong>device_code was actually issued for.</strong></p><p>Combined with vulnerability #1, the authorization server ends up issuing tokens under one client’s identity (Google Cloud SDK, or any other Google-registered client, first- or third-party) for a session that started under a completely different one (YouTube TV). redirect_uri isn't just weakly validated here: it's not present at all, because the grant never travels through a redirect in this flow to begin with.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/700/1*4UwF2sE4BZuwRTMM9aJo9w.gif"><figcaption><em>PoC: device-code hijack escalated from YouTube TV to Google Cloud SDK scopes</em></figcaption></figure><p>The escalation chain worked end to end, at least on paper. Only one step was left: telling Google about it, and finding out whether they’d agree it was a bug at all.</p><h3>6. From Consent Screen to One Click</h3><p>I filed this as a report. It came back rejected the next day, citing user interaction: the victim “consented.” Fair, in a narrow sense: the consent screen is genuinely rendered by Google, the click is a genuine click. But the <em>thing being consented to</em> was shaped entirely by parameter substitution in a link I built, and from the victim’s side there is nothing to notice that’s different from any other Google sign-in. Still, “user interaction” was the stated bar, so the next step was removing it.</p><p>OAuth has a prompt parameter for exactly the case of skipping the consent screen: set to none, it tells the authorization server not to show any UI if the user has already granted the requested scopes to that client before. It's meant to be narrow, restricted to low-risk scopes like openid, email, profile, and gated on prior consent.</p><p>In practice it isn’t narrow at all. “Sign in with Google” is everywhere, and most people have already granted openid email profile to dozens, sometimes hundreds, of apps over the years without ever thinking about it again.</p><p>Take the weaponized device-code URL, drop in Facebook’s client_id (any site using "Sign in with Google" works the same way), set scope=openid email profile, add prompt=none. The victim opens the link, and that's the only action required: no consent screen, no button to press. The browser silently completes the flow in the background, the polling script receives an id_token for that third-party application, and that token replays cleanly against the app's own "Sign in with Google" endpoint.</p><p><strong>One link. Opening it is the only interaction required. Account takeover on virtually any application that uses Sign in with Google.</strong></p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/700/1*hHiWXmNkC5aWkKKDsmLD9w.gif"><figcaption><em>PoC: prompt=none one-click bypass against a third-party client</em></figcaption></figure><p>The technical bypass was solid. What I didn’t know yet was whether any of it would actually be visible, to the victim or to Google’s own monitoring, if it were used for real.</p><h3>7. Why the Victim Never Notices</h3><p>The natural follow-up: surely <em>something</em> surfaces to the victim: a login alert, a new entry under connected apps, a 2FA prompt? It doesn’t, and that’s not incidental. Every signal that would normally catch this gets routed around by the shape of the device-code flow itself.</p><p><strong>Audit trail pollution.</strong> myaccount.google.com/connections shows the <em>original</em> client bound to the device_code, YouTube TV, never the substituted application. To find any trace of the attack, a victim would have to open the connections page, scroll to find "YouTube TV" among however many connected apps they have, click into it, click "see details" to expand the granted scopes, and then recognize that YouTube TV requesting cloud-platform / compute / appengine.admin is not normal. Five deliberate steps and a piece of domain knowledge very few people have.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/0*Nq78jsm8FNLJ6QFG.png"><figcaption><em>The “YouTube on TV” connections entry, expanded: Gmail read/compose/send/delete, Cloud SQL, App Engine, and Compute Engine, all under a client that’s supposed to only need YouTube scopes</em></figcaption></figure><p><strong>Implicit 2FA bypass.</strong> The victim goes through a completely ordinary Google sign-in, which already satisfies any 2FA they have configured. The token handoff to the attacker happens afterward, over the device poll, with no further prompt of any kind. The actual high-risk action, an OAuth grant under an arbitrary client’s identity, never trips a high-risk challenge, because as far as the authentication layer is concerned, nothing risky happened; a user just logged in normally.</p><p>Stealth, solved. The remaining question was reach: how far the same substitution trick could be pushed past YouTube TV’s own scopes.</p><h3>8. Extending the Primitive</h3><p>Stealth is one axis; reach is the other. The same client_id/scope substitution keeps paying out against different corners of the Google ecosystem.</p><p><strong>Persistent access via </strong><strong>accounts.reauth.</strong> Add that scope to the substitution and the resulting grant can refresh indefinitely, with no further victim interaction required: a shoot-and-forget backdoor rather than a one-time token.</p><p><strong>A Gmail backdoor via IMAP, not the REST API.</strong> Substituting a client_id that's allowed to request https://mail.google.com (Apple's iOS Mail client, for instance) gets a token scoped to full Gmail access. Hitting the Gmail REST API with it fails: <em>"Gmail API has not been used in project 861556708454 before or it is disabled."</em> That project ID belongs to YouTube TV, and the original device-code client never had the Gmail API enabled. That's a project-level gate, not a token-level one, so it's worth checking whether there's another door into the same mailbox. Gmail's IMAP server supports OAuth via the <strong>XOAUTH2</strong> SASL mechanism, using the exact same https://mail.google.com/ scope but going through imap.gmail.com:993 instead of the REST API's project-gated surface. It accepts the token without issue. Full inbox access, with the same token the REST API had just rejected.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/0*k7pQv3pDxP21l5DQ.png"><figcaption><em>Successful IMAP XOAUTH2 authentication over the substituted token, listing real Gmail folders and recent inbox messages</em></figcaption></figure><p>End to end: a transferable session, plus unvalidated client_id/scope binding, plus prompt=none, equals a link that's invisible to the person who opens it and ends in a fully compromised account, Gmail included.</p><p>Chain complete: transferable session, unbound client_id/scope, prompt=none, silent to the victim, and a Gmail backdoor at the end of it. Time to see what Google's VRP panel made of all that.</p><h3>9. Disclosure Timeline</h3><p><strong>Feb 25, 2026</strong> Report filed with Google VRP<br><strong>Mar 2, 2026</strong> Closed: Won’t Fix (Intended Behavior), citing “social engineering”<br><strong>Mar 2, 2026</strong> Pushed back same day<br><strong>Mar 3, 2026</strong> Reopened, then closed again: Won’t Fix (Infeasible)<br><strong>Mar 3, 2026</strong> Countered with a prompt=none one-click PoC against Facebook’s client_id<br><strong>Mar 4, 2026</strong> Reopened a second time and accepted; bug filed with the product team<br><strong>Mar 28, 2026</strong> Marked fixed<br><strong>Apr 2, 2026</strong> Rewarded $13,337</p><p>The two rejections both leaned on the same argument: that tricking a user into approving an OAuth prompt is a social-engineering problem, not a vulnerability in Google’s implementation. That didn’t hold up on either pass. The first rejection ignored that this is the exact sign-in flow every Google user already knows, on accounts.google.com, arriving at an app that has no business holding cloud-platform or appengine.admin scopes doing exactly that. The second treated it as equivalent to installing a malicious OAuth app, which the prompt=none PoC against Facebook's client_id directly disproved: there was no prompt to approve, and no app to install; the victim only had to open a link.</p><h3>10. Mitigations</h3><p>For a flow that’s explicitly designed to hand sign-in off to a second device, the fix has to happen server-side, since there’s nothing meaningful a client application can check on its own:</p><ol><li>Keep user_code, device_code, and any session reference that resolves to them out of URLs entirely. If a session can't be copied into a different browser, it can't be handed to a victim.</li><li>Bind client_id and scope to the device_code at issuance time, server-side. At the consent step, look those values up from that binding instead of trusting whatever the URL says; reject any mismatch.</li><li>On the consent screen, show device information (name, model) and require the user to actively confirm that device is the one in front of them.</li></ol><h3>11. Conclusion</h3><p>The device authorization grant is a narrow, deliberately low-trust flow, right up until the authorization server treats “who is asking” and “what are they asking for” as details that only need to be true at the <em>start</em> of the flow, not checked again by the time consent is granted. Once the session itself turned out to be transferable across browsers, the missing binding between device_code and client_id/scope stopped being a narrow YouTube TV bug and became a way to mint tokens for any Google-registered client, first-party or third-party, capped only by which scopes that client happens to be allowed to request.</p><p>Thanks for reading.</p><p>Originally published on <a href="https://weirdmachine64.github.io/research/google-oauth-device-code-hijacking.html">https://weirdmachine64.github.io/research/google-oauth-device-code-hijacking.html</a></p><img src="https://medium.com/_/stat?event=post.clientViewed&amp;referrerSource=full_rss&amp;postId=dc6ec2db35a9" width="1" height="1" alt=""><hr><p><a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/confused-deputy-google-idp-universal-account-takeover-via-device-code-flow-hijacking-dc6ec2db35a9">Confused Deputy: Google IdP Universal Account Takeover via Device Code Flow Hijacking</a> was originally published in <a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/">InfoSec Write-ups</a> on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Robert Laidlow: Reality Eaters album review]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[BBC Philharmonic/Havlat/Kaziboni/Piatti Quartet(NMC)Einstein’s field equations, Newton’s universal law and artificial intelligence are among the subjects of Laidlow’s ambitious orchestral worksRobert Laidlow is as at home in the realms of science and technology as he is in the world of classical ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675223/ai-nachrichten/robert-laidlow-reality-eaters-album-review/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675223/ai-nachrichten/robert-laidlow-reality-eaters-album-review/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 08:34:01 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>BBC Philharmonic/Havlat/Kaziboni/Piatti Quartet<br>(NMC)</strong><br>Einstein’s field equations, Newton’s universal law and artificial intelligence are among the subjects of Laidlow’s ambitious orchestral works</p><p>Robert Laidlow is as at home in the realms of science and technology as he is in the world of classical music. As this NMC debut album demonstrates, his intricate, wildly imaginative work is eminently approachable, even if the core concepts are highly complex.</p><p>Warp, a terse, 12-minute piano concerto, proposes a musical solution to Einstein’s field equations as the intrepid Joseph Havlat boldly goes where no pianist has gone before amid the distorting fabric of orchestral space-time. Strident orchestral lines spiral ever upwards, stretching instruments to their limits, while the piano maintains its course towards a serene conclusion. Handsomely recorded, the BBC Philharmonic and Vimbayi Kaziboni offer vibrantly detailed support.</p> <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/music/2026/jul/17/robert-laidlow-reality-eaters-album-review">Continue reading...</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Podcast: Wie KI Meinungen und deinen Nachrichtenkonsum manipuliert]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag Podcast: Wie KI Meinungen und deinen Nachrichtenkonsum manipuliert erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
BREAK/THE WEEK ist dein wöchentlicher Tech-Talk von BASIC thinking, der dich hi...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675206/it-nachrichten/podcast-wie-ki-meinungen-und-deinen-nachrichtenkonsum-manipuliert/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675206/it-nachrichten/podcast-wie-ki-meinungen-und-deinen-nachrichtenkonsum-manipuliert/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 08:32:54 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/17/podcast-011/">Podcast: Wie KI Meinungen und deinen Nachrichtenkonsum manipuliert</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>BREAK/THE WEEK ist dein wöchentlicher Tech-Talk von BASIC thinking, der dich hinter die Kulissen der Tech-Welt nimmt. In der neuen Ausgabe diskutieren wir über KI als Nachrichtenquelle, Atomstrom zu Mondpreisen und digitale Erschöpfung durch Social Media.  Die Themen dieser Ausgabe: KI als Nachrichtengatekeeper: Wie ChatGPT &amp; Co. Quellen auswählen – und warum das gefährlich ist […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/17/podcast-011/">Podcast: Wie KI Meinungen und deinen Nachrichtenkonsum manipuliert</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple TV Confirms Stillwater Season 5 Release Date, All Episodes Arrive This August]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple TV has confirmed the release date for Stillwater season 5, giving families another collection of gentle stories focused on emotions, friendship, and everyday challenges. The animated series will return globally on Friday, August 21, 2026, with all five new episodes arriving together.



The...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675081/ios-mac-os/apple-tv-confirms-stillwater-season-5-release-date-all-episodes-arrive-this-august/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675081/ios-mac-os/apple-tv-confirms-stillwater-season-5-release-date-all-episodes-arrive-this-august/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 07:09:45 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple TV has confirmed the release date for Stillwater season 5, giving families another collection of gentle stories focused on emotions, friendship, and everyday challenges. The animated series will return globally on Friday, August 21, 2026, with all five new episodes arriving together.



The new season continues the award-winning story of siblings Karl, Addy, and Michael, whose wise panda neighbor helps them understand their feelings and look at difficult situations from a calmer perspective. Viewers can currently stream the first four seasons on Apple TV.



Here are the main details about the upcoming season:




Release date: Friday, August 21, 2026



Number of episodes: Five



Release schedule: All episodes will arrive together



Genre: Animated kids and family series



Start airing date: August 21, 2026



Finish date: August 21, 2026



Where to watch: Apple TV



Main voice cast: James Sie, Eva Ariel Binder, Tucker Chandler, and Judah Mackey




What is Stillwater season 5 about?







Stillwater follows Karl, Addy, and Michael as they deal with problems that feel familiar to young viewers, including disappointment, uncertainty, disagreements, and fear of trying something new.



Their neighbor Stillwater listens to their concerns and often shares a thoughtful story that helps them see the situation differently. His advice encourages the children to slow down, understand their emotions, and find their own way forward.



Season 5 will continue this familiar format through five new adventures. Each episode will focus on the children learning more about themselves, their relationships, and the world around them. The series remains inspired by Jon J Muth’s bestselling Zen book collection.



The first look at the season shows Stillwater returning alongside the three siblings, suggesting that the new episodes will maintain the peaceful visual style and warm storytelling that have defined the show since its 2020 debut.



There are currently no major plot details or episode descriptions available, so viewers will need to wait for a trailer or further announcements to learn which specific challenges Karl, Addy, and Michael will face.




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zz1GkcvkT1g




FAQs



When is the Stillwater season 5 release date?



Stillwater season 5 will premiere globally on Apple TV on Friday, August 21, 2026.



How many episodes are in Stillwater season 5?



The fifth season contains five new episodes. Apple TV will release all five episodes on the premiere date, allowing families to watch the full season immediately.



Will Stillwater season 5 release weekly?



No. All five episodes will become available together on August 21, 2026.



Who voices Stillwater in the animated series?



James Sie voices Stillwater. The main cast also includes Eva Ariel Binder as Addy, Tucker Chandler as Michael, and Judah Mackey as Karl.



Is Stillwater suitable for children?



Yes. Stillwater is an animated kids and family series that focuses on emotional awareness, mindfulness, kindness, and solving everyday problems.



Where can I watch the previous seasons?



All four previous seasons are available to stream on Apple TV before season 5 arrives.



Is Stillwater season 5 the final season?



Apple TV has announced the fifth season but has not officially described it as the final season. Its future beyond these five episodes remains unconfirmed.



Apple TV costs $12.99 per month in the United States after a seven-day free trial. With every new episode arriving on the same day, families can watch Stillwater season 5 at their own pace from August 21. Do you plan to watch the new season? Let us know in the comments.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CO2-Batterie speichert Strom dreimal länger als Lithium-Akkus]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag CO2-Batterie speichert Strom dreimal länger als Lithium-Akkus erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Im Rahmen der Energiewende suchen viele Länder immer weiter nach günstigen und effiz...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3674998/it-nachrichten/co2-batterie-speichert-strom-dreimal-laenger-als-lithium-akkus/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3674998/it-nachrichten/co2-batterie-speichert-strom-dreimal-laenger-als-lithium-akkus/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 05:47:43 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/17/co2-batterie-australien/">CO2-Batterie speichert Strom dreimal länger als Lithium-Akkus</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Im Rahmen der Energiewende suchen viele Länder immer weiter nach günstigen und effizienten Möglichkeiten zur Speicherung von Energie. Australien plant jetzt eine CO2-Batterie, die mit einer Leistung von bis zu 20 Megawatt etwa zehn bis zwölf Stunden lang Strom speichern können soll.  Die State Electricity Commission (SEC) in Australien kündigte kürzlich die Errichtung eines neuen […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/17/co2-batterie-australien/">CO2-Batterie speichert Strom dreimal länger als Lithium-Akkus</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[China’s Moonshot AI releases Kimi K3, the largest open-source model ever, rivaling top U.S. systems]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Moonshot AI, the Beijing-based artificial intelligence startup backed by Alibaba, on Thursday released Kimi K3 — a 2.8-trillion-parameter model that the company says is now the largest open-source AI model in the world, and one that benchmarks show performs neck-and-neck with the most powerful pr...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3674665/it-nachrichten/chinas-moonshot-ai-releases-kimi-k3-the-largest-open-source-model-ever-rivaling-top-us-systems/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3674665/it-nachrichten/chinas-moonshot-ai-releases-kimi-k3-the-largest-open-source-model-ever-rivaling-top-us-systems/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 23:17:55 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.moonshot.ai/">Moonshot AI,</a> the Beijing-based artificial intelligence startup backed by Alibaba, on Thursday released <a href="https://platform.kimi.ai/docs/guide/kimi-k3-quickstart">Kimi K3</a> — a 2.8-trillion-parameter model that the company says is now the largest open-source AI model in the world, and one that benchmarks show performs neck-and-neck with the most powerful proprietary systems from <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/">Anthropic</a> and <a href="https://openai.com/">OpenAI</a>.</p><p>The release, timed to land just ahead of the <a href="https://aiii.global/waic-2026/">2026 World Artificial Intelligence Conference</a> in Shanghai, is a dramatic escalation in the global AI arms race and a watershed moment for the open-source AI movement. It also marks a remarkable comeback for a company whose market position had eroded significantly over the past 18 months following DeepSeek's meteoric rise.</p><p>Full model weights are scheduled to be released on July 27, according to details shared by researchers who reviewed the company's technical documentation. If you want to take <a href="https://platform.kimi.ai/docs/guide/kimi-k3-quickstart">Kimi K3</a> for a spin right now, you can — just head to<a href="https://www.kimi.com/"> kimi.com</a>, sign up with a Google account or phone number (no credit card required), and start chatting with what may be the most powerful open-source model ever built.</p><div></div><h2><b>Inside the architecture that powers the world's largest open-source AI model</b></h2><p><a href="https://platform.kimi.ai/docs/guide/kimi-k3-quickstart">Kimi K3</a> is a frontier-class large language model with 2.8 trillion total parameters — roughly 75 percent larger than <a href="https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro">DeepSeek's V4 Pro</a>, which the company's own timeline chart shows at approximately 1.6 trillion parameters. The model features a 1-million-token context window, native visual understanding capabilities, and an always-on reasoning mode that the company calls "thinking mode."</p><p>The model is built on two key architectural innovations developed internally at Moonshot AI: <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.26692">Kimi Delta Attention</a>, a hybrid linear attention mechanism, and <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15031">Attention Residuals</a>, which the company describes as a drop-in replacement for residual connections that delivers consistent scaling gains. Both techniques were previously published as open research by the Moonshot team on <a href="https://github.com/moonshotai">GitHub</a>.</p><p>On the <a href="https://platform.kimi.ai/docs/guide/kimi-k3-quickstart">API side</a>, Kimi K3 is compatible with the <a href="https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/guides/agents">OpenAI SDK</a>, lowering the integration barrier for developers already building on OpenAI or Anthropic toolchains. The model is priced at $3 per million input tokens and $15 per million output tokens, with cached input tokens dropping to just $0.30 per million — pricing that positions it roughly in line with mid-tier offerings from Western labs, but at a performance level the company claims approaches the top of the market. A promotional top-up rebate running through August 12 offers up to 30 percent back in vouchers for API credits of $1,000 or more.</p><p>As <a href="https://finance.sina.com.cn/stock/t/2026-07-17/doc-inihzrtu1375218.shtml?cref=cj">Xinhua reported</a>, a Moonshot AI executive explained the significance of the parameter count in simple terms: parameters are like neural connections in the human brain, and nearly 3 trillion of them means the model can "store more knowledge and patterns in its brain, understand more, think deeper, and answer more accurately."</p><div></div><h2><b>Benchmark results show Kimi K3 trading blows with Claude and GPT at the top of the leaderboard</b></h2><p>The benchmark results, drawn from public leaderboard data and a private evaluation by analytics firm Artificial Analysis, tell a striking story.</p><p>On <a href="https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/gdpval-aa">GDPval-AA v2</a>, a benchmark measuring real-world tasks across 44 occupations and 9 major industries, Kimi K3 scored 1,687 — placing it third overall, behind only Claude Fable 5 Max (1,815) and GPT-5.6 Sol Max (1,747.8), and ahead of Claude Opus 4.8 (1,600).</p><p>On <a href="https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-briefcase">AA-Briefcase</a>, a private agentic benchmark from Artificial Analysis designed to test long-horizon knowledge work, K3 climbed to second place with a score of 1,527 — beating GPT-5.6 Sol Max (1,495) and trailing only Fable 5 Max (1,587).</p><p>Perhaps most impressively, K3 achieved a state-of-the-art score of 91.2 out of 100 on <a href="https://openai.com/index/browsecomp/">BrowseComp</a>, a benchmark for long-horizon, high-difficulty information seeking. </p><p>The company says it accomplished this in a single-agent setup using its 1-million-token context window, without any context compression or additional context management techniques — a feat that suggests raw context length, when paired with strong retrieval capabilities, may be more powerful than elaborate multi-agent workarounds.</p><p>As <a href="https://x.com/kimmonismus/status/2077818040578695175">one widely followed AI commentator</a> put it on social media: "Open source is no longer lagging six months behind Western closed-source models. Read that again, and think about what it all means."</p><p>That observation captures the significance of the moment. For much of the past three years, open-source models have typically trailed their proprietary counterparts by a meaningful margin. Kimi K3 appears to have closed that gap almost entirely.</p><h2><b>How a 48-hour autonomous chip design demo reveals Moonshot's real ambitions</b></h2><p>Beyond raw benchmarks, <a href="https://www.moonshot.ai/">Moonshot AI</a> showcased a proof-of-concept that may be even more revealing of K3's capabilities and the company's strategic direction.</p><p>In a demonstration documented in the company's technical materials, <a href="https://platform.kimi.ai/docs/guide/kimi-k3-quickstart">Kimi K3</a> was tasked with designing a physical chip to run a nano-scale version of itself. Over 48 hours of continuous autonomous agent operation, K3 independently completed the chip's full construction pipeline — from architectural design through optimization and verification — using open-source electronic design automation tools. The result was a tiny but functional chip design, just 4 square millimeters, that achieved timing convergence at 100 MHz and could decode more than 8,700 tokens per second in simulation.</p><p>This is not a production chip. It is a demonstration of what <a href="https://www.moonshot.ai/">Moonshot AI</a> clearly views as the next competitive frontier: long-range autonomous agent capabilities. The ability to sustain coherent, multi-step technical work over a 48-hour window — reading documentation, making design decisions, running verification loops, and iterating on failures — represents a qualitative leap beyond the kind of single-turn question-answering that defined the first generation of large language models.</p><p>The company also highlighted a case in computational astrophysics, where K3 reportedly reproduced the universal <a href="https://inspirehep.net/literature/1220233">I-Love-Q relation</a> — a complex calculation that typically takes a senior researcher one to two weeks — in approximately two hours, reading and cross-validating more than 20 papers and implementing a complete numerical pipeline along the way.</p><h2><b>Moonshot AI's fall and rise tells the story of China's brutal AI market</b></h2><p>To understand why <a href="https://platform.kimi.ai/docs/guide/kimi-k3-quickstart">Kimi K3</a> matters, you need to understand where Moonshot AI was 18 months ago — and how far it fell.</p><p>Founded in 2023 by <a href="https://kimiyoung.github.io/">Yang Zhilin</a>, a Tsinghua University graduate who previously conducted research at Google and Meta, Moonshot AI quickly became one of China's most prominent AI startups. The company gained early traction in 2024 when users flocked to its <a href="http://kimi.ai/">Kimi platform</a> for its long-text analysis capabilities and AI search functions. By early 2026, it had raised roughly <a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/the-prompt/2026/07/15/ai-startup-reflection-compute-deal-to-challenge-chinas-open-source-dominance/">$1.5 billion</a> across multiple rounds, with its valuation climbing from $2.5 billion to $4.3 billion and the company reportedly <a href="https://tech.yahoo.com/ai/gemini/articles/china-moonshot-releases-open-source-141110760.html">seeking a new round at $5 billion</a>.</p><p>Then DeepSeek happened. The release of DeepSeek's low-cost R1 model in January 2025 disrupted the entire Chinese AI landscape, and Moonshot AI was among the hardest hit. Kimi, which had ranked third in monthly active users in China, slid to seventh. The company's strategic pivot to open-source models — beginning with Kimi K2 in July 2025 and accelerating with K2.5 in January 2026 — was in large part an effort to reclaim relevance.</p><p><a href="https://platform.kimi.ai/docs/guide/kimi-k3-quickstart">Kimi K3</a> is the culmination of that effort — and the sheer scale of the model suggests that Moonshot AI has been planning this move for some time. Training a 2.8-trillion-parameter model requires enormous computational resources and months of preparation, which means the architectural and infrastructure decisions behind K3 were likely locked in well before the model reached the public.</p><h2><b>Why open-sourcing the world's biggest model is a geopolitical chess move</b></h2><p>The decision to release K3's full weights on July 27 is strategically significant and worth parsing carefully.</p><p>The company's own timeline chart of open-source frontier model scale positions K3 as a dramatic outlier, towering above competitors like <a href="https://github.com/deepseek-ai">DeepSeek</a> (1.6T), <a href="https://github.com/xiaomi">Xiaomi</a> (1.02T), and <a href="https://github.com/ALIBABA">Alibaba</a> (397B). By releasing the world's largest open-source model, Moonshot AI is making a bid to become the center of gravity for the global open-source AI developer community.</p><p>This follows a broader trend among Chinese AI companies. As <a href="https://www.reuters.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/china-weighs-silicon-curtain-around-sought-after-ai-models-2026-07-08/">Reuters noted</a>, open-sourcing allows companies to "showcase their technological capabilities and expand developer communities as well as their global influence, a strategy likely to help China counter U.S. efforts to limit Beijing's tech progress." DeepSeek, Alibaba, Tencent, and Baidu have all released open-source models. But none have released anything at this parameter count.</p><p>For enterprise technology leaders, the implications are concrete. A 2.8-trillion-parameter open-source model that performs at near-frontier levels creates new options for companies that want to fine-tune, self-host, or build proprietary systems on top of a capable base model — without being locked into API contracts with OpenAI or Anthropic. The trade-off, of course, is that running a model of this size requires substantial GPU infrastructure. Inference at 2.8 trillion parameters is not something that runs on a single server rack.</p><p>That said, <a href="https://www.moonshot.ai/">Moonshot AI</a> has signaled awareness of this challenge. Its Mooncake project, which won the Best Paper award at FAST 2025, pioneered KV-cache-centric disaggregated serving for large language models — an architecture designed specifically to make inference at extreme scale more practical and cost-efficient.</p><h2><b>Kimi Code and a three-tier model lineup form the foundation of Moonshot's enterprise play</b></h2><p>Alongside K3, Moonshot AI continues to invest heavily in its coding agent ecosystem. <a href="https://github.com/MoonshotAI/kimi-code/releases">Kimi Code</a>, the company's open-source coding tool that competes with Anthropic's Claude Code and Google's Gemini CLI, received two major updates on the same day as K3's launch — versions 0.25.0 and 0.26.0 — adding features like expanded subagent tooling, background task management, and security fixes.</p><p>The <a href="https://github.com/MoonshotAI/kimi-cli">Kimi Code CLI</a> has accumulated over 3,100 stars on GitHub and features integration with VSCode, Cursor, and Zed. The latest release expanded the "coder subagent" tool set to include background tasks, todo lists, plan mode, skill invocation, and nested agents — effectively turning the coding agent into a multi-layered autonomous system capable of managing complex software engineering projects with minimal human intervention.</p><p>This is not incidental. Coding tools have become a critical revenue driver for AI labs. As Anthropic disclosed in January, <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/news/anthropic-acquires-bun-as-claude-code-reaches-usd1b-milestone">Claude Code reached $1 billion in annualized recurring revenue</a>. By building Kimi Code as an open-source alternative that defaults to Kimi's own models — but supports other providers — Moonshot AI is positioning itself to capture developer workflows and, eventually, enterprise contracts.</p><p>The company's model lineup now includes three tiers: <a href="https://platform.kimi.ai/docs/guide/kimi-k3-quickstart">K3</a> as the flagship ($3/$15 per million tokens for input/output), <a href="https://platform.kimi.ai/docs/guide/kimi-k2-7-code-quickstart">K2.7 Code</a> as a specialized coding model ($0.95/$4), and <a href="https://platform.kimi.ai/docs/guide/kimi-k2-6-quickstart">K2.6</a> as a general-purpose option ($0.95/$4). All three support context windows of 256,000 tokens or above, with K3 offering the full 1-million-token window. Context caching is automatic — no cache ID, TTL, or extra parameter is required — a small but meaningful developer-experience advantage over competitors that require explicit cache management.</p><h2><b>What Kimi K3 means for the future of enterprise AI and the global model landscape</b></h2><p>Kimi K3's release forces a recalibration of several assumptions that have guided enterprise AI strategy.</p><p>The performance gap between open-source and proprietary models has functionally closed at the frontier. If K3's benchmark numbers hold up under independent evaluation — and particularly once the open weights are available for community testing on July 27 — it will be difficult for closed-source providers to justify premium pricing purely on the basis of capability.</p><p>The locus of AI innovation, meanwhile, continues to shift. China's AI ecosystem, which many Western observers questioned after early struggles with chip export restrictions, has now produced a model that competes with the best systems from companies with direct access to Nvidia's most advanced hardware. The architectural innovations behind K3 — particularly the hybrid linear attention mechanism — suggest that algorithmic efficiency may matter as much as raw compute.</p><p>And the agentic capabilities demonstrated by K3 — chip design, multi-week research compression, long-horizon information seeking — point toward a future where AI models are not just answering questions but autonomously executing complex, multi-day projects. For enterprises evaluating AI investments, this shifts the value proposition from "productivity copilot" to "autonomous technical workforce."</p><p><a href="https://finance.sina.com.cn/stock/t/2026-07-17/doc-inihzrtu1375218.shtml?cref=cj">Xinhua</a>, China's state news agency, framed the release as a national milestone, reporting that K3 "marks a new step forward in the development of China's artificial intelligence models." Liu Tieyan, dean of the Zhongguancun Academy in Beijing, was quoted as saying that a wave of Chinese open-source models has moved from isolated breakthroughs to collective advancement, providing "new solutions and new paths" for global AI development.</p><p>Just two years ago, <a href="https://www.moonshot.ai/">Moonshot AI</a> was a scrappy startup named for the audacious problems it hoped to solve. Eighteen months ago, it was a cautionary tale about how quickly a market darling can lose its footing. Today, it is the maker of the world's largest open-source AI model — one that can, given 48 hours and an internet connection, design a chip to run itself. The frontier, it turns out, is not a place. It is a race. And the field just got a lot more crowded.</p><p>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The agent security gap: 54% of enterprises have already had an AI agent incident, and most still let agents share credentials]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Across 107 enterprises, AI agents are being given real access to systems and data while the controls meant to contain them lag behind. More than half have already had a confirmed agent security incident or a near-miss; only about a third give every agent its own scoped identity, and most agents s...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3674536/it-nachrichten/the-agent-security-gap-54-of-enterprises-have-already-had-an-ai-agent-incident-and-most-still-let-agents-share-credentials/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3674536/it-nachrichten/the-agent-security-gap-54-of-enterprises-have-already-had-an-ai-agent-incident-and-most-still-let-agents-share-credentials/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 21:47:26 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Across 107 enterprises, AI agents are being given real access to systems and data while the controls meant to contain them lag behind. More than half have already had a confirmed agent security incident or a near-miss; only about a third give every agent its own scoped identity, and most agents still share credentials; and only three in ten isolate their highest-risk agents. The security stack is overwhelmingly borrowed from the model providers and hyperscalers rather than purpose-built for agents, spending remains a thin slice of the security budget, and enterprises are evenly split on whether their defenses are keeping pace with AI-enabled attackers. The result is an agent security gap — autonomous agents proliferating faster than the identity, isolation, and enforcement controls needed to hold them.</p><p>This wave of VentureBeat Pulse Research examines how enterprises secure their AI agents: what tooling they run, how they manage agent identity and isolation, what has already gone wrong, how much they spend, and whether they believe their defenses are keeping pace with AI-enabled attackers.</p><p>The central finding is an agent security gap — the distance between the autonomy enterprises are granting their agents and the controls in place to contain them. More than half of organizations (54%) have already experienced a confirmed agent security incident (18%) or a near-miss caught before harm (36%). The structural weakness beneath those numbers is identity: only about a third (32%) give every agent its own scoped, managed identity, while the rest report that some agents share credentials or that agents mostly run on shared API keys and human or service-account credentials. When agents share credentials, a single compromised or over-permissioned agent carries a wide blast radius — and only three in ten enterprises (30%) isolate their highest-risk agents in sandboxes to bound that radius.</p><p>What makes the gap notable is how comfortable enterprises are inside it. The security stack is overwhelmingly provider-native — OpenAI’s guardrails (51%), Google’s and Microsoft’s cloud controls, and Anthropic’s managed-agent controls dominate, while the dedicated agent-security specialists barely register — and satisfaction with that borrowed stack is high, averaging 4.2 out of 5. Yet spending remains a thin slice of the security budget, only a third of enterprises believe their AI defenses are ahead of AI-enabled attackers, and a clear majority plan to change tooling within the year. Enterprises are satisfied with controls they are simultaneously preparing to replace.</p><h2>Methodology</h2><p>VentureBeat fielded this survey as part of its ongoing Pulse Research series, this instrument focused on enterprise agent security — the tooling, identity, isolation, and enforcement controls organizations use to secure autonomous AI agents. Responses are filtered to organizations with more than 100 employees (n=107; the survey’s smallest size band, 1–100 employees, is excluded), drawn from a single June 2026 wave. Because this is one wave rather than a pooled multi-month sample, the report reads cross-sectionally and does not infer month-over-month trends. Several questions were multiple-select, so those shares can sum to more than 100%.</p><p>By role the sample is senior and buyer-credible: 45% are final decision-makers for AI purchases and another 30% recommenders or influencers. Managers (43%), individual contributors (24%), VPs and directors (15%), and the C-suite (11%) make up the seniority mix. By organization size the sample is mid-market-weighted: 251–1,000 (42%) and 101–250 (25%) employees lead, with 1,001–5,000 (19%), 5,001–10,000 (8%), and 10,001+ (7%) above them. Technology/Software is the largest industry at 23%, followed by Manufacturing (15%), Retail/E-commerce (14%), and Healthcare/Life Sciences (13%).</p><p>At 107 respondents the sample is large enough to read directionally but should be treated as a directional signal rather than a precise measurement; it is self-selected and is not a probability sample. It skews toward the mid-market, so it is best read as the view from organizations actively standing up agent security rather than from the largest operators.</p><p>Satisfaction ratings are computed on the respondents who answered each rating question; the overall satisfaction score reflects 82 of the 107 qualified respondents.</p><h2>Finding 1: The incidents are already here</h2><p><b>More than half have had an agent security incident or near-miss</b></p><p>We asked whether organizations had experienced an agent security incident — a confirmed breach, or a near-miss caught before harm. Most that run agents in production had.</p><div></div><p>This is the report’s defining number. More than half of organizations (54%) have already had an agent security event — 18% a confirmed incident and 36% a near-miss caught before it caused harm. Only 42% report nothing, and a small remainder either run no agents in production or don’t track such events. That so many report near-misses rather than only confirmed incidents is telling: enterprises are catching problems, but they are catching them close to the edge. The controls examined in the rest of this report — identity, isolation, enforcement — are what determine whether the next near-miss stays a near-miss.</p><p>Exposure scales with company size, but containment does not. The incident-or-near-miss rate rises from 49% in the mid-market (companies with 101-1,000 employees) to 63% at larger enterprises (above 1,000 employees), while sandbox isolation of high-risk agents falls from 35% to 20%, and satisfaction with security tooling drops from 4.36 to 3.97. The organizations running the most agents across the most systems carry the most incidents and the least of the one control that bounds an incident's blast radius.</p><h2>Finding 2: The identity gap</h2><p><b>Only a third give every agent its own scoped identity</b></p><p>We asked how enterprises manage the identity of their AI agents — whether each agent has its own credentials, or agents share them. Full per-agent identity is the exception.</p><div></div><p>Rolled together, the overlapping answers show 69% of enterprises (74 of 107) with credential sharing somewhere in the agent fleet. Identity is the structural weakness beneath the incidents. Only about a third of enterprises (32%) give every agent its own scoped, managed identity — the precondition for least-privilege access and clean attribution. Nearly half (48%) say some agents have scoped identities but many still share credentials, and another 32% say agents mostly run on shared API keys or borrowed human and service-account credentials. (Respondents could describe more than one pattern across their agent fleet, so these overlap.) </p><p>The consequence is direct: when agents share credentials, an over-permissioned or compromised agent can act with far more reach than intended, and forensics after an incident cannot cleanly tell which agent did what. The non-human identity problem — giving every agent its own governed identity — is the single largest unfinished piece of enterprise agent security.</p><p>Moreover, a company’s agent credential posture is correlated with incidents. Organizations with credential sharing anywhere in the fleet were hit — with an incident or a near-miss in the past twelve months — at 63.5% (47 of 74). Organizations where every agent carries its own scoped identity were hit at 40.9% (9 of 22). The fully-scoped group is small, so for now the relationship is an association rather than proven causation, and the gap is concentrated in the mid-market — but within a single survey, a twenty-three point difference in incident rate suggests significance.</p><h2>Finding 3: Observe and enforce, but rarely isolate</h2><p><b>Only three in 10 sandbox their highest-risk agents</b></p><p>We asked what an organization’s agent security posture looks like in practice — whether they observe, enforce, isolate, or some combination. The control that bounds damage is the least common.</p><div></div><p>Monitoring and enforcement are reasonably common; containment is not. Roughly half of enterprises observe agent activity (47%) or enforce scoped permissions at runtime (49%), but only 30% isolate their highest-risk agents in sandboxes that bound the blast radius when the other controls fail. That ordering is backwards from a defense-in-depth standpoint: observation tells you what happened, enforcement tries to prevent it, but isolation is what limits the damage when prevention fails — and it is the control enterprises have adopted least. Combined with the identity gap in Finding 2, the picture is of agents that are watched and permissioned but rarely boxed in, which is precisely the configuration in which a single failure propagates.</p><h2>Finding 4: Security runs on borrowed, provider-native controls</h2><p><b>Guardrails from OpenAI, Google and Microsoft dominate; specialists barely register</b></p><p>We asked which agent security tooling enterprises use, and which is their primary layer. The answer favors the model providers and hyperscalers over the dedicated security vendors.</p><div></div><p>Enterprises are securing agents with tools that came bundled with their models and clouds. OpenAI’s guardrails lead at 51%, followed by Google’s and Microsoft’s cloud-native controls and Anthropic’s managed-agent controls — and when asked to name their single primary security layer, 82% name one of these provider-native offerings. The purpose-built agent-security category — Palo Alto’s Prisma AIRS, CrowdStrike, Cisco AI Defense, Zenity, HiddenLayer, Check Point’s Lakera, Okta for AI Agents, non-human identity platforms — barely registers, each in the low single digits, and only 5% run no dedicated tooling at all. As with retrieval and evaluation elsewhere in this series, the provider bundle is winning the default: enterprises reach first for the guardrails their platform ships, and the independent security layer that would address the identity and isolation gaps has not yet been adopted at scale.</p><p>The provider-default pattern is consistent across both Q2 survey waves. In April–May (n=110), usage was led by the same names — OpenAI's controls at 26%, Azure at 15%, AWS at 14%, Google at 12% — with every dedicated agent-security specialist at 3% or below and one in ten using no dedicated tooling at all. The common finding from the two surveys: Enterprises are defaulting to the solutions provided by the platform they’re using, and the specialist category vendors have yet to become big players here.</p><p>(<i>A note on reading these shares. As described in the methodology section, the respondent sample is self-selected and skews mid-market, and the usage question counted every vendor or approach a respondent has in place — so the figures measure presence in the security stack rather than spending or exclusivity. Individual vendor percentages therefore carry all the usual sample caveats. The structural pattern, however, held across both Q2 waves on two differently worded questions: provider-native and hyperscaler controls lead, and dedicated agent-security specialists remain in low single digits. Read the individual shares loosely and the pattern with confidence.)</i></p><h2>Finding 5: And enterprises are comfortable with it</h2><p><b>Satisfaction is high, even as incidents mount and identity lags</b></p><p>We asked how satisfied enterprises are with their current agent security tooling. The comfort is notably out of step with the exposure documented above.</p><div></div><p>Satisfaction with agent security tooling is high — 4.2 out of 5 overall, and 4.1 for value for money — among the most positive readings in this series. That is the striking part: enterprises are highly satisfied with a stack that is mostly borrowed provider guardrails, even though more than half have already had an incident or near-miss and only a third give their agents scoped identities. The comfort appears to rest on the convenience and low friction of provider-native controls rather than on demonstrated containment. It is a false comfort in the making — the same enterprises expressing satisfaction are, as Finding 8 shows, a clear majority planning to change tooling within the year, which suggests the confidence is thinner than the score implies.</p><h2>Finding 6: Budgets haven’t caught up</h2><p><b>Most spend under a tenth of the security budget on agents</b></p><p>We asked what share of the security budget enterprises allocate to securing AI agents. For a fast-emerging risk, the allocation is modest.</p><div></div><p>Spending on agent security is still a thin slice. The most common allocation is 6–10% of the security budget (46%), and a third of enterprises (34%) spend 5% or less; only a quarter (24%) devote more than a tenth. Given the incident rate in Finding 1 and the identity and isolation gaps in Findings 2 and 3, the budget looks like a lagging indicator — the risk has arrived faster than the funding to address it. The enterprises spending more than a tenth of their security budget on agents are a distinct minority, and they are likely the ones building the scoped-identity and isolation controls the rest have not.</p><h1>Finding 7: The arms race is even, at best</h1><p><b>Only a third think their AI defenses are ahead of AI-enabled attackers</b></p><p>We asked how enterprises assess the balance between their AI-enabled defenses and AI-enabled attackers. Confidence is far from settled.</p><div></div><p>Enterprises are split on whether they are winning. Only about a third (35%) believe their AI-enabled defenses are ahead of AI-enabled attackers; the rest are less sure — 32% call it roughly even, 21% think attackers are ahead, and another 21% say it is too early to tell. Taken together, a clear majority (53%) rate the balance as even or tilted toward the attacker. That uncertainty sits uneasily beside the high satisfaction of Finding 5: enterprises are content with their tooling yet unconvinced it is winning the contest it exists to win. In a domain where the offense is also compounding with AI, an even race is not a comfortable place to be.</p><h2>Finding 8: A security reshuffle is coming</h2><p><b>Nearly six in 10 plan to adopt or switch tooling within a year</b></p><p>We asked whether enterprises plan to adopt a new, additional, or replacement agent security solution, and which they are considering. Few intend to stand pat.</p><div></div><p>The security stack is not settled. While 41% have no plans to change, a clear majority (59%) intend to adopt a new, additional, or replacement agent security solution within twelve months, and 29% within the next quarter — a strong signal that, high satisfaction notwithstanding, enterprises know the current stack is provisional. Incidents are what start the buying cycle. </p><p>Among organizations that have been hit, 42.1% plan to adopt, add, or replace agent security tooling within the next ninety days, against 14.0% of organizations with no incident — and after a confirmed incident it becomes majority behavior, at 52.6%. Getting hit also changes the threat assessment: 33.3% of hit organizations say AI-armed attackers are ahead of their defenses, against 8.0% of the unhit. Experience, in this data, is the strongest predictor of both urgency and pessimism.</p><p>The consideration set still leans provider-native (OpenAI 34%, Google 30%, Anthropic 29%, Azure 25%), but the dedicated security vendors — Cloudflare, Cisco, Palo Alto, Okta, Check Point’s Lakera — draw early interest in the mid-to-high single digits, more than their current footprint. </p><p>What the shopping does not yet include is the identity layer specifically. Twelve percent of the respondents include an agent-identity product — Okta for AI Agents, Microsoft Entra Agent ID, or a non-human identity platform — anywhere in their consideration set, and among the credential-sharing organizations that have already had an incident, identity consideration is essentially unchanged, at roughly one in ten. The control most directly implicated by the incident data is the one largely missing from the purchase plans. Whether this wave hardens the provider-native default or finally opens the door to purpose-built agent security — the identity and isolation controls the incidents call for — is the question this series will keep tracking.</p><h2>The bottom line: A security gap that autonomy will test first</h2><p>Organizations with more than 100 employees are giving AI agents real reach into systems and data while securing them with controls built for something else. More than half have already had an incident or near-miss; only a third give every agent its own scoped identity, and most still share credentials; only three in ten isolate their highest-risk agents; and the stack doing this work is overwhelmingly borrowed from the model providers and hyperscalers rather than purpose-built for agents.</p><p>The uncomfortable pairing is confidence with exposure: satisfaction with the current tooling is among the highest in this series, yet spending is a thin slice of the security budget, only a third believe their defenses are ahead of AI-enabled attackers, and a clear majority are already planning to replace what they have. At 107 respondents in a single wave this is a directional read, skewed toward the mid-market — but the direction is clear: agent adoption is running ahead of agent security, and the controls that matter most when something fails — scoped identity and isolation — are the ones enterprises have built least. The agent security gap is not a coverage problem that a provider guardrail will close on its own; it is a problem of identity, isolation, and enforcement built for autonomous software. The open question for later waves is whether enterprises close it deliberately — or whether a confirmed incident closes it for them.</p><hr><p><i>Based on survey responses from 107 qualified enterprise respondents (100+ employees), drawn from a single June 2026 wave. This is a directional read, not a precise measurement — the sample is self-selected and skews mid-market, so it's best read as the view from organizations actively standing up agent security rather than from the largest operators. Respondents are senior and buyer-credible (45% final decision-makers, 30% recommenders/influencers), spanning managers through the C-suite, and drawn primarily from Technology/Software, Manufacturing, Retail/E-commerce, and Healthcare/Life Sciences.</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[EU soll Tempo-Drosselung von Autos per Satellit planen – ein Faktencheck]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag EU soll Tempo-Drosselung von Autos per Satellit planen – ein Faktencheck erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Steuert die EU bald per Satellit, wie schnell du fahren darfst? Britische...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3674389/it-nachrichten/eu-soll-tempo-drosselung-von-autos-per-satellit-planen-ein-faktencheck/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3674389/it-nachrichten/eu-soll-tempo-drosselung-von-autos-per-satellit-planen-ein-faktencheck/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 20:32:34 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/16/eu-tempo-autos-satellit-faktencheck/">EU soll Tempo-Drosselung von Autos per Satellit planen – ein Faktencheck</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Steuert die EU bald per Satellit, wie schnell du fahren darfst? Britische Medien berichten zumindest über Pläne, Autos ab 2030 automatisch zu drosseln. Die EU-Kommission widerspricht deutlich. Die Hintergründe.  Aktuell kursieren Medienberichte, die behaupten, dass die EU eine neue Verordnung für Fahrzeuge prüft. Ab 2030 sollen neue Autos laut Daily Mail und The Telegraph mit einem […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/16/eu-tempo-autos-satellit-faktencheck/">EU soll Tempo-Drosselung von Autos per Satellit planen – ein Faktencheck</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Mira Murati’s Thinking Machines Unveils Customizable Inkling AI Model]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Thinking Machines released Inkling, an open-weight AI model built for enterprise customization through its Tinker platform and available on Hugging Face.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3674365/it-nachrichten/mira-muratis-thinking-machines-unveils-customizable-inkling-ai-model/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3674365/it-nachrichten/mira-muratis-thinking-machines-unveils-customizable-inkling-ai-model/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 20:16:30 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Thinking Machines released Inkling, an open-weight AI model built for enterprise customization through its Tinker platform and available on Hugging Face.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The AI compute gap: Enterprises are buying infrastructure faster than they can measure what it costs]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Across 107 enterprises, AI infrastructure spending is accelerating well ahead of the ability to see or steer its economics. Most organizations run their AI on a familiar base of hyperscalers and model-provider APIs, yet the next dollar is aimed at specialized compute almost none of them use today...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3674337/it-nachrichten/the-ai-compute-gap-enterprises-are-buying-infrastructure-faster-than-they-can-measure-what-it-costs/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3674337/it-nachrichten/the-ai-compute-gap-enterprises-are-buying-infrastructure-faster-than-they-can-measure-what-it-costs/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 20:02:38 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Across 107 enterprises, AI infrastructure spending is accelerating well ahead of the ability to see or steer its economics. Most organizations run their AI on a familiar base of hyperscalers and model-provider APIs, yet the next dollar is aimed at specialized compute almost none of them use today; a majority intend to switch or add providers within the year, many within a quarter. Buying decisions turn on integration and total cost of ownership rather than headline token price — which is fortunate, because most enterprises cannot yet see their unit economics clearly: GPUs sit at half utilization or less, and fewer than half rigorously track what their compute actually costs. The result is a compute gap — heavy, fast-moving investment running ahead of the visibility needed to control it.</p><p>This wave of VentureBeat Pulse Research examines enterprise AI infrastructure and compute: where organizations are in their deployment journey, what they run AI on today, how satisfied they are, what would make them switch, where they plan to evaluate their investments, and — most revealingly — how well they can measure and control the economics of the compute underneath it all.</p><p>The central finding is a compute gap — the distance between how aggressively enterprises are investing in AI infrastructure and how little of its economics they can see. Only about one in five (21%) run AI in production at scale, yet spending intentions are outrunning that maturity: the single largest planned area enterprises plan to evaluate over the next year is AI-specialized clouds (45%), a layer almost none of these enterprises use today. Meanwhile the compute already in place runs cold — 83% report GPU utilization of 50% or less — and fewer than half (44%) can rigorously track what their AI compute costs. Enterprises are buying more infrastructure faster than they can account for what they already own.</p><p>Enterprises are not settled on their infrastructure vendors, either: A clear majority (64%) plan to switch or add an infrastructure provider within twelve months, and 38% within the next quarter — unusually high churn intent for a category this foundational. When they choose, they choose on integration with the existing stack (41%) and total cost of ownership (35%), not on headline price: cost per million tokens is the deciding factor for just 8%. And the frontier constraint that will shape the next round of decisions — the shift from GPU compute to memory bandwidth as inference scales — is barely on the radar, with roughly one in five enterprises either unaware of it or yet to address it.</p><h2>Methodology</h2><p>VentureBeat fielded this survey as part of its ongoing Pulse Research series, this survey focused on enterprise AI infrastructure, compute, and inference economics. Responses are filtered to organizations with more than 100 employees (n=107; the survey’s smallest size band, 1–100 employees, is excluded), drawn from a single Q2 2026 (June) wave. Because this is one wave rather than a pooled multi-month sample, the report reads cross-sectionally and does not infer month-over-month trends. Several questions were multiple-select, so those shares can sum to more than 100%.</p><p>By organization size the sample concentrates in the mid-market: 101–250 employees (36%) and 251–1,000 (27%) lead, with 1,001–5,000 (22%), 5,001–10,000 (8%), and 10,001+ (7%) above them. By role it spans managers (38%), individual contributors (28%), VPs and directors (19%), and the C-suite (13%); on purchasing authority it is buyer-credible, with 45% final decision-makers and another 30% recommenders or influencers for AI solutions. Technology/Software is the largest industry at 26%, followed by Healthcare/Life Sciences (15%), Financial Services (13%), and Retail/E-commerce (12%).</p><p>At 107 respondents the sample is large enough to read directionally but should be treated as a directional signal rather than a precise measurement; it is self-selected and is not a probability sample. It also skews toward the mid-market and toward earlier-stage adopters, so it is best read as the view from organizations actively building out AI infrastructure rather than from the largest hyperscale operators.</p><h2>Finding 1: Ambition outpaces production</h2><p><b>Only one in five run AI in production at scale</b></p><p>We asked where organizations sit in their AI deployment journey. Most are still building toward production rather than operating at scale.</p><div></div><table><tbody><tr><td><p><b>38%</b></p></td><td><p><b>are experimenting — running proofs of concept, not yet in production</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>37%</b></p></td><td><p><b>have some workloads in production, but not across the organization</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>21%</b></p></td><td><p><b>run AI in production at scale — the mature minority</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>4%</b></p></td><td><p><b>are not yet running AI workloads at all</b></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>The maturity curve is front-loaded. Three-quarters of enterprises (76%) are either experimenting or running only some workloads in production, and just 21% describe AI in production at scale. This matters for everything that follows: the infrastructure decisions in this report are being made largely by organizations still early in deployment, whose compute footprint — and whose costs — are about to grow. The evaluation and switching intentions in Findings 3 and 4 are the leading edge of that build-out, not the settled preferences of operators who have already found what works.</p><h2>Finding 2: Enterprises run on hyperscalers and model APIs</h2><p><b>The specialized GPU clouds barely register — today</b></p><p>We asked which providers and platforms enterprises currently use to run their AI. The answer is a familiar one: the incumbents.</p><div></div><table><tbody><tr><td><p><b>48%</b></p></td><td><p><b>use Google Cloud — the most-used platform overall (Microsoft Azure 29%, AWS 22%, Oracle Cloud 22%)</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>41%</b></p></td><td><p><b>use Google’s Gemini models, with OpenAI close behind at 40% and Anthropic at 12%</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>6%</b></p></td><td><p><b>run their own on-prem or co-located GPU clusters; 4% a custom open-source self-managed stack</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>&lt;2%</b></p></td><td><p><b>each use the specialized AI clouds — CoreWeave, Lambda, Crusoe, Nebius, Together, Fireworks and peers</b></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>The current stack is hyperscaler-and-API. Google Cloud leads at 48%, and the general-purpose clouds (Google, Microsoft, AWS, Oracle) together with the major model APIs (Gemini, OpenAI, Anthropic) account for essentially all current deployment. The specialized “neocloud” GPU providers that dominate AI-infrastructure headlines — CoreWeave, Lambda, Crusoe, Nebius and peers — register at or near zero among these enterprises today. Only 6% run their own on-prem GPU clusters and 4% a custom open-source stack. Enterprises are, for now, running AI on the providers they already buy from — which makes the evaluation intentions in Finding 3 all the more striking.</p><p><i>(A note on reading these shares. As described in the methodology section, this sample is self-selected and skews mid-market, and this question counted every provider a respondent uses — an average of 2.1 selections each — so the figures measure presence in the stack rather than spending or primary status. A sample built this way will show a different provider mix than a spend-weighted census of the broader market; Google's strength here, for example, is consistent with its long-standing position among smaller enterprises building on AI. Read these shares as a portrait of what this AI-active cohort runs today, and treat gaps between these figures and industry-wide market share estimates as a property of the sample rather than a contradiction of either.)</i></p><h2>Finding 3: The next dollar goes to infrastructure they don’t yet run</h2><p><b>AI-specialized clouds top the evaluations list</b></p><p>We asked where enterprises planned to evaluate AI infrastructure over the next 12 months. Their answers point away from the stack they run today.</p><div></div><table><tbody><tr><td><p><b>45%</b></p></td><td><p><b>AI-specialized clouds (CoreWeave, Lambda, Crusoe, Nebius) — the top planned evaluation area</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>32%</b></p></td><td><p><b>non-NVIDIA accelerators (AWS Trainium, Google TPU, AMD Instinct, Intel Gaudi, in-house ASICs)</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>28%</b></p></td><td><p><b>Nvidia Blackwell (GB300) / next-generation GPUs</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>16%</b></p></td><td><p><b>decentralized or distributed compute networks</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>11%</b></p></td><td><p><b>sovereign or region-specific compute; 9% say none of the above</b></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Here is the report’s sharpest tension. The single most-cited planned evaluation area — AI-specialized clouds, at 45% — is the very category almost none of these enterprises use today (Finding 2). Nearly a third (32%) intend to evaluate non-Nvidia accelerators, and 28% in next-generation Nvidia silicon; even decentralized compute networks (16%) and sovereign compute (11%) draw meaningful interest. Read against current usage, this is not incremental — it is the leading edge of a re-platforming. The direction-of-travel question tells the same story: every infrastructure approach is net-expanding, but specialized AI clouds carry the highest net momentum (+24), edging out even the hyperscalers (+22). Enterprises are preparing to move a meaningful share of AI compute off the general-purpose cloud.</p><p>This continues a trend we saw in our April-May survey wave. Back then, usage of the AI-specialized clouds was equally marginal — CoreWeave at 3%, Lambda at 4%, Crusoe at 2% of enterprises. When we asked enterprises what change they planned in their AI infrastructure strategy over the next twelve months, the most-cited answer was moving workloads to specialized AI clouds, at 33%. Asked in April-May which emerging compute option they were most likely to evaluate AI-specialized clouds again drew the most responses. Two waves, two differently worded questions, one consistent picture: the type of cloud enterprises are most eager to assess is the type they have barely begun to use.</p><h2>Finding 4: A switching wave is building</h2><p><b>Six in 10 plan to change providers within a year — many within a quarter</b></p><p>We asked whether and when enterprises plan to switch or add an infrastructure provider. Very few intend to stand still.</p><div></div><table><tbody><tr><td><p><b>38%</b></p></td><td><p><b>plan to change within the next 0–3 months — tied for the most common answer</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>36%</b></p></td><td><p><b>have no plans to change</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>22%</b></p></td><td><p><b>plan to change within 3–6 months</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>7%</b></p></td><td><p><b>plan to change within 6–12 months</b></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>For a category as foundational as compute, this is a remarkable amount of intended movement. Only 36% have no plans to change, meaning a clear majority (64%) intend to switch or add a provider within twelve months — and 38% within the next quarter alone. Where that interest points is telling: the providers drawing the most switching consideration are again the incumbents — Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud (33% each), OpenAI (30%), and Gemini (22%) — which suggests much of the near-term movement is reshuffling among the majors and consolidating spend rather than defecting to new entrants. The neocloud interest in Finding 3 is a 12-month evaluation thesis; the switching in the next quarter is mostly incumbents trading share.</p><p>(<i>Method note: Respondents who selected both "no plans to change" and a specific switching window are counted as switchers, on the logic that naming a timeframe is the more specific answer; three respondents were reclassified under this rule.</i>)</p><h2>Finding 5: Nobody buys on token price</h2><p><b>Integration and total cost of ownership decide — not sticker price</b></p><p>We asked what matters most when enterprises select an AI infrastructure provider. Headline price finished last.</p><div></div><table><tbody><tr><td><p><b>41%</b></p></td><td><p><b>integration with the existing cloud and data stack — the top factor</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>35%</b></p></td><td><p><b>total cost of ownership (TCO)</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>24%</b></p></td><td><p><b>performance — latency and throughput</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>19%</b></p></td><td><p><b>each cite security/compliance, autoscaling for spiky workloads, and GPU access/availability</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>8%</b></p></td><td><p><b>cost per 1M tokens — the least-cited factor</b></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Enterprises do not buy AI infrastructure on pricing, which is the place vendors compete on hardest. Integration with the existing stack (41%) and total cost of ownership (35%) dominate, while the headline metric — cost per million tokens — is the deciding factor for just 8%, dead last. The pattern is coherent: buyers are optimizing for how a provider fits and what it truly costs to operate, not for the advertised unit rate. It also foreshadows Finding 7 — enterprises say TCO matters most, yet most cannot yet measure it rigorously. The stated priority and the measured capability are out of step.</p><h2>Finding 6: Expensive GPUs, idle most of the time</h2><p><b>83% report GPU utilization of 50% or less</b></p><p>We asked what share of their GPU capacity enterprises actually utilize. The answer is a well-known but rarely quantified inefficiency.</p><div></div><table><tbody><tr><td><p><b>37%</b></p></td><td><p><b>run at 26–50% utilization</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>34%</b></p></td><td><p><b>run at 10–25% utilization</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>15%</b></p></td><td><p><b>run under 10% utilization</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>12%</b></p></td><td><p><b>run over 50% — the efficient minority</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>8%</b></p></td><td><p><b>don’t measure utilization at all; a further 7% consume via API and run no GPUs of their own</b></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p><i>Disclosure: Band percentages count every selection against all 107 qualified respondents; 14 respondents selected more than one band, so bands overlap. At the respondent level, 83 of the 100 GPU-operating enterprises reported utilization at or below 50%</i></p><p>The compute already in place runs cold. Adding the bands at or below half capacity, 83% of enterprises that operate GPUs report utilization of 50% or less, and nearly half (49%) run at 25% or below. Only 12% clear the 50% mark, and a further 8% do not measure utilization at all. Idle accelerators are expensive accelerators, and this is the clearest single measure of the compute gap: enterprises are planning to buy more GPUs and specialized compute (Finding 3) while the capacity they already own sits substantially unused. The efficiency headroom in the current fleet is large — and largely unmeasured.</p><h2>Finding 7: Spending fast, measuring slowly</h2><p><b>Fewer than half rigorously track what their compute costs</b></p><p>We asked whether enterprises can quantify the cost and return of their AI infrastructure spend, and how satisfied they are with what they run. Confidence in the ledger lags the spending.</p><div></div><table><tbody><tr><td><p><b>44%</b></p></td><td><p><b>track compute cost and ROI rigorously</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>39%</b></p></td><td><p><b>track it only partially</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>20%</b></p></td><td><p><b>can’t quantify it yet</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>6%</b></p></td><td><p><b>say it isn’t a priority</b></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Measurement trails money. Fewer than half of enterprises (44%) rigorously track the cost and return of their AI compute; the majority track only partially (39%), cannot quantify it yet (20%), or have not prioritized it (6%). That gap is consequential given Finding 5, where total cost of ownership was the second-ranked buying criterion — enterprises are choosing providers on an economic basis they mostly cannot yet measure. Satisfaction with current infrastructure is moderately positive but not enthusiastic: on a five-point scale, overall satisfaction averages 4.0, with ease of implementation (3.8) and value for money (3.9) trailing slightly — the softness landing, tellingly, on cost. Enterprises are spending quickly and accounting slowly.</p><h2><b>Finding 8: The next bottleneck few are watching</b></h2><p><b>As inference shifts from compute to memory, the field scatters</b></p><p>Finally, we asked how enterprises would address the emerging constraint in large-scale inference — the shift from GPU compute to memory, specifically KV-cache capacity. The responses reveal a frontier that is not yet a priority.</p><div></div><table><tbody><tr><td><p><b>31%</b></p></td><td><p><b>would rely on Dell (PowerScale / Project Lightning) — the leading single answer</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>16%</b></p></td><td><p><b>would rely on Nvidia (Dynamo / ICMSP)</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>18%</b></p></td><td><p><b>are not aware of this as a constraint (9%) or haven’t addressed inference-memory limits yet (8%)</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>10%</b></p></td><td><p><b>Hammerspace (Tier Zero); 9% DDN (Infinia); the rest split across open-source KV-cache tooling, model-level efficiency, VAST Data, and WEKA</b></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>The memory frontier is real but barely governed. Asked which approach they would rely on as the binding constraint in inference shifts from compute to memory bandwidth, enterprises scatter: Dell leads at 31%, Nvidia follows at 16%, and the rest fragments across storage vendors, open-source tooling, and model-level efficiency techniques. Most telling is that roughly one in five (18%) either do not recognize the constraint or have not begun to address it. For a shift that will reshape inference cost and architecture, this is an early and unsettled market — and, consistent with the measurement gap in Finding 7, one where many enterprises simply do not yet have a view. It is the next chapter of the compute gap, arriving before most have closed the current one.</p><h1><b>The bottom line: A compute gap that faster spending will widen, not close</b></h1><p>Organizations with more than 100 employees are investing in AI infrastructure faster than they can measure it. Most are still early in deployment, yet their spending intentions point past their current stack — toward specialized clouds and alternative accelerators almost none of them run today — and a clear majority intend to change providers within the year. They buy on integration and total cost of ownership rather than headline price, which is rational; the difficulty is that most cannot yet see those economics clearly.</p><p>The visibility gap is concrete. The GPUs enterprises already own run at half utilization or less for the overwhelming majority, and fewer than half can rigorously track what their compute costs or returns. Satisfaction is decent but unenthusiastic, softest on value for money — the dimension hardest to judge without measurement. And the next constraint, the shift from compute to memory in large-scale inference, is arriving while most enterprises are still unaware of it. At 107 respondents in a single Q2 wave this is a directional read, skewed toward the mid-market and earlier-stage adopters — but the direction is consistent: the appetite to spend is running well ahead of the instrumentation to spend well. The compute gap is not a capacity problem that more hardware will solve on its own; it is, first, a problem of seeing what the hardware already costs. The open question for later waves is whether enterprises build that visibility before the re-platforming arrives — or buy the next layer of infrastructure as blind to its economics as the last.</p><hr><p><i>Based on survey responses from 107 qualified enterprise respondents (100+ employees), drawn from a single Q2 2026 (June) wave. Because this is one wave rather than a pooled multi-month sample, the results read cross-sectionally rather than as a month-over-month trend, and at 107 respondents this is a directional signal rather than a precise measurement — the sample is self-selected, skews mid-market, and leans toward earlier-stage adopters rather than the largest hyperscale operators. Respondents include managers, individual contributors, VPs/directors, and the C-suite, with buyer-credible purchasing authority, across Technology/Software, Healthcare/Life Sciences, Financial Services, Retail/E-commerce, and other industries.</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Amazon AGI director says AI agent reliability, not capability, is blocking enterprise deployment at VB Transform 2026]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The enterprise AI industry has a math problem. Cisco data shows 85% of enterprises are piloting AI agents, but only 5% have shipped them to production. At VB Transform 2026 on Tuesday, Bryan Silverthorn, Director of AGI Autonomy at Amazon, explained why that gap persists — and why the answer isn'...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3674071/it-nachrichten/amazon-agi-director-says-ai-agent-reliability-not-capability-is-blocking-enterprise-deployment-at-vb-transform-2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3674071/it-nachrichten/amazon-agi-director-says-ai-agent-reliability-not-capability-is-blocking-enterprise-deployment-at-vb-transform-2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 18:19:10 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The enterprise AI industry has a math problem. Cisco data shows <a href="https://venturebeat.com/security/85-of-enterprises-are-running-ai-agents-only-5-trust-them-enough-to-ship">85% of enterprises</a> are piloting AI agents, but only 5% have shipped them to production. At <a href="https://venturebeat.com/vbtransform2026">VB Transform 2026</a> on Tuesday, <a href="https://silverthorn.blog/">Bryan Silverthorn</a>, Director of AGI Autonomy at Amazon, explained why that gap persists — and why the answer isn't better benchmarks.</p><p>Silverthorn, who joined Amazon through its acquisition of Adept AI and now leads multimodal agent training inside the company's AGI lab, argued that reliability must be broken into four distinct dimensions: consistency, robustness, predictability, and safety — a framework he credits to research from Princeton.</p><p>"It unpacks different factors that I see tangled together in almost every eval I've ever seen," he said.</p><h2><b>Why AI agents pass internal evals but fail real customers in production</b></h2><p>The framework matters because agents routinely ace internal evaluations and then collapse in the wild. Silverthorn described a customer that deployed an agent for software QA involving serial number extraction from screens. It worked flawlessly for two months — then began intermittently reading wrong numbers. The culprit: the underlying vision encoder behaved differently depending on where the serial number appeared on screen, and a software change imperceptible to humans triggered the failure.</p><p>The lesson, Silverthorn said, is about measurement, not just models. "The models have to be better. Obviously, we're working hard on making the models better," he said. But the deeper takeaway, he added, is that teams need to identify their dimensions of variability and match measurement rigor to the stakes of the application. VentureBeat's own proprietary research, presented before the session, reinforces the point: half of surveyed companies shipped agents that passed internal evals but failed real customers, and enterprises overwhelmingly track uptime while ignoring accuracy — checking the pulse without checking the diagnosis. A related finding underscored how few guardrails exist: most enterprises default to the model makers' own evaluations and little else, leaving their testing strategy, as I described it on stage, a coin flip between trusting the vendor and trusting nothing.</p><h2><b>Inside Amazon's 'intern' framework for managing autonomous AI agents</b></h2><p>Silverthorn's most memorable prescription was cultural, not technical. Inside Amazon's AGI lab, researchers literally call their agents "interns" — as in, "I'll have my intern talk to your intern." The joke carries a serious operational philosophy. Agents, like interns, are powerful but occasionally clueless, capable of amazing work and spectacular derailment.</p><p>Managing them, he argued, requires management skills rather than software skills: asking what could go wrong, adding backups and undo capabilities, and consciously deciding what risk you can accept. "You can ask the intern, 'Hey, what might you do wrong here? How might you mitigate your negative outcomes?'" he said. Amazon's lab has embraced that trade-off, accepting agents occasionally running the wrong experiment in exchange for research velocity — including one agent running experiments around the clock on its own high-level research plan.</p><h2><b>What enterprise leaders should do before deploying agents at scale</b></h2><p>Silverthorn was candid about the limits of today's technology. Self-improving AI remains "a loaded term," he said — Amazon uses AI to improve its models constantly, but fully autonomous self-improvement is distant. Computer use remains a core focus of his lab, with a commercial trucking customer already using browser automation to stitch together warranty claims across fragmented systems**, though he stressed that no future agent will rely on computer use alone — it will work alongside MCP, APIs, and other tools to complete end-to-end workflows**. And LLM-as-judge techniques, while promising, are just one of several strategies for aligning agent capability with acceptable risk.</p><p>For enterprises stuck in pilot purgatory, the path forward starts with a mindset shift: stop asking whether your agent can do something impressive once, and start asking whether it can do it correctly a thousand times in a row.</p><p>In other words, the enterprises that escape the 85% ceiling won't be the ones with the smartest agents. They'll be the ones with the best managers.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The best Setapp apps for knowledge workers in 2026]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Find the best Setapp app for knowledge workers, from capturing information and thinking visually to structuring ideas and dedicated AI apps.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3674019/ios-mac-os/the-best-setapp-apps-for-knowledge-workers-in-2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3674019/ios-mac-os/the-best-setapp-apps-for-knowledge-workers-in-2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 17:41:12 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Find the best Setapp app for knowledge workers, from capturing information and thinking visually to structuring ideas and dedicated AI apps.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[South Korea To Launch Universal Basic AI Chatbot]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Register: South Korea's government has posted a tender seeking suppliers to build a universal basic AI chatbot, and an AI agent for government services. The "AI for everyone" plan calls for private entities to create and operate the AI systems under co...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3673899/it-security-nachrichten/south-korea-to-launch-universal-basic-ai-chatbot/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3673899/it-security-nachrichten/south-korea-to-launch-universal-basic-ai-chatbot/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 17:08:20 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Register: South Korea's government has posted a tender seeking suppliers to build a universal basic AI chatbot, and an AI agent for government services. The "AI for everyone" plan calls for private entities to create and operate the AI systems under contracts that expire in the year 2031. Bid documents reveal that Seoul will provide up to 256 Nvidia B200 GPUs to successful bidders. Winners must match government funding. The aim of the policy is to ensure that every resident of South Korea can access a free-to-use quality AI chatbot, a tool Seoul has decided no local should be without.
 
The tender also calls for creation of an agentic system that allows citizens to interact with government services. South Korea's government wants to ensure that residents can always access a locally hosted and operated service, to reduce reliance on overseas providers and ensure that AI services reflect local culture. Successful bidders must therefore use locally developed AI models as the foundation for the services. Bidders have until August 11th to file their proposals. South Korean media reports suggest local tech giants Kakao, Naver, SK Telecom, and LG are all keen to participate.<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=South+Korea+To+Launch+Universal+Basic+AI+Chatbot%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fslashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F16%2F0431223%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fslashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F16%2F0431223%2Fsouth-korea-to-launch-universal-basic-ai-chatbot%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://slashdot.org/story/26/07/16/0431223/south-korea-to-launch-universal-basic-ai-chatbot?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[ChatGPT ist zurück in WhatsApp, Apple verklagt OpenAI, Meta greift Fable 5 und GPT-5.6 an | KI-News]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: Digitale Profis - Bewertung: 2x - Views:45 Artikel & Newsletter: https://digitaleprofis.de/die-ki-news-vom-16-07-2026/

Quellen
Meta Muse Spark 1.1 
Artikel: https://ai.meta.com/blog/introducing-muse-spark-meta-model-api/  
Preise: https://developer.meta.com/ai/resources/blog/build-with-m...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3673889/ai-nachrichten/chatgpt-ist-zurueck-in-whatsapp-apple-verklagt-openai-meta-greift-fable-5-und-gpt-56-an-ki-news/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3673889/ai-nachrichten/chatgpt-ist-zurueck-in-whatsapp-apple-verklagt-openai-meta-greift-fable-5-und-gpt-56-an-ki-news/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 17:03:29 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: Digitale Profis - Bewertung: 2x - Views:45 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/FdTC7Qe1cbE?autoplay=1&origin=http://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p>Artikel & Newsletter: https://digitaleprofis.de/die-ki-news-vom-16-07-2026/<br />
<br />
Quellen<br />
Meta Muse Spark 1.1 <br />
Artikel: https://ai.meta.com/blog/introducing-muse-spark-meta-model-api/  <br />
Preise: https://developer.meta.com/ai/resources/blog/build-with-muse-spark <br />
Markt-Reaktion: https://x.com/PolymarketMoney/status/2075578900638482606 <br />
Zuckerberg: https://x.com/finkd/status/2075218444056707458 <br />
<br />
Panik bei Anthropic? <br />
Tweet: https://x.com/claudeai/status/2076351399999557669 <br />
Doku: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15424964-claude-fable-5-promotional-access <br />
Artikel: https://www.anthropic.com/news/redeploying-fable-5 <br />
<br />
Kimi K3? <br />
Teaser: https://x.com/Kimi_Moonshot/status/2077521842080817296 <br />
Hugging Face: https://huggingface.co/moonshotai <br />
<br />
SeeDance 2.5 <br />
Artikel: https://www.testingcatalog.com/exclusive-early-30-second-ai-videos-generated-by-seedance-2-5/ <br />
Tweet: https://x.com/TheoMediaAI/status/2075175391782650201 <br />
Website: https://dreamina.capcut.com/seedance/seedance-2-5 <br />
<br />
Reve 2.1 Bildmodell <br />
Artikel: https://blog.reve.com/posts/launching-reve-2.1/ <br />
Leaderboard: https://arena.ai/leaderboard/text-to-image <br />
Preise: https://help.reve.com/hc/en-us/articles/46732445465108-Subscription-plans-overview <br />
<br />
Canva Code 2.0 <br />
Artikel: https://www.canva.com/newsroom/news/Canva-Code/ <br />
Preise: https://www.canva.com/pricing/ <br />
<br />
Demis Hassabis warnt <br />
Artikel: https://demishassabis.substack.com/p/a-framework-for-frontier-ai-and-the-dawning-of-a-new-age <br />
<br />
Inkling von Thinking Machines  <br />
Artikel: https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/introducing-inkling/ <br />
Modellkarte: https://thinkingmachines.ai/model-card/inkling/ <br />
Hugging Face: https://huggingface.co/thinkingmachines/Inkling <br />
Nutzungsregeln: https://thinkingmachines.ai/model-acceptable-use-policy/ <br />
<br />
GPT-Red Modell <br />
Artikel: https://openai.com/index/unlocking-self-improvement-gpt-red/ <br />
<br />
ChatGPT in Whatsapp ist zurück <br />
Tweet: https://x.com/ChatGPTapp/status/2076654365121855835 <br />
Doku: https://help.openai.com/en/articles/6825453-chatgpt-release-notes <br />
Hintergrund: https://openai.com/index/chatgpt-whatsapp-transition/ <br />
<br />
Apple verklagt OpenAI <br />
Artikel: https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/apple-sues-openai-alleging-misappropriation-trade-secrets-court-records-show-2026-07-10/ <br />
Reaktion: https://apnews.com/article/apple-openai-lawsuit-trade-secrets-theft-6fff8833f5889d86406b89a02dd8fb16 <br />
Gerüchte um Hardware: https://www.macrumors.com/2026/07/14/openai-ai-hardware-device-speaker/ <br />
<br />
Meta greift mit Muse Spark 1.1 zu einem extrem niedrigen Preis GPT und Claude Fable an, Seedance erzeugt bis zu drei Minuten lange KI-Videos und Apple verklagt OpenAI wegen angeblich gestohlener Geschäftsgeheimnisse.<br />
In unserem KI-Update der Woche schauen wir außerdem auf die Gerüchte rund um Kimi K3, das neue Bildmodell Reve 2.1, Canva Code 2.0 und Inkling – ein riesiges neues Open-Weights-Modell von Thinking Machines.<br />
<br />
Weitere Themen:<br />
– Anthropic verlängert den Zugang zu Claude Fable 5<br />
– Demis Hassabis warnt vor den Risiken immer mächtigerer KI<br />
– OpenAI trainiert mit GPT-Red einen KI-Angreifer<br />
– ChatGPT ist im Europäischen Wirtschaftsraum zurück auf WhatsApp<br />
– Neue Gerüchte über OpenAIs erstes eigenes Hardwaregerät<br />
<br />
Werde Kanalmitglied und unterstütze damit unsere Arbeit:<br />
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCv90NdTyTp7ZPPRvvSZaS5w/join<br />
<br />
Videoinhalt:<br />
00:00 Die KI-News der Woche vom 16.07.2026<br />
00:23 Meta will mit Muse Spark 1.1 angreifen<br />
01:31 Anthropic verlängert Fable 5 Zugriff schon wieder<br />
02:22 Gerüchte rund um Kimi K3 von Moonshot AI<br />
03:19 Bis zu 3 Minuten lange KI-Videos mit SeeDance 2.5<br />
04:06 Reve 2.1 Bild-KI vorgestellt<br />
04:55 Canva Code 2.0 für Vibe Coding in Canva<br />
05:55 DeepMind Chef Demis Hassabis warnt vor AGI<br />
06:52 Neues Inkling Open Source Modell von Thinking Machines<br />
07:38 GPT-Red Modell hilft beim Absichern von KI-Modellen<br />
08:41 ChatGPT ist zurück auf WhatsApp<br />
09:18 Apple verklagt OpenAI<br />
<br />
Videovorschläge, Feedback und Kritik kannst Du uns jederzeit in den Kommentaren mitteilen!<br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Dreame A3 AWD Pro 3500 im Test: Mähroboter mit Allrad und LiDAR]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag Dreame A3 AWD Pro 3500 im Test: Mähroboter mit Allrad und LiDAR erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Ein Mähroboter für bis zu 3.500 Quadratmeter, der ohne Begrenzungskabel und ohne R...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3673718/it-security-nachrichten/dreame-a3-awd-pro-3500-im-test-maehroboter-mit-allrad-und-lidar/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3673718/it-security-nachrichten/dreame-a3-awd-pro-3500-im-test-maehroboter-mit-allrad-und-lidar/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 16:08:44 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/16/dreame-a3-awd-pro-3500-test/">Dreame A3 AWD Pro 3500 im Test: Mähroboter mit Allrad und LiDAR</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Ein Mähroboter für bis zu 3.500 Quadratmeter, der ohne Begrenzungskabel und ohne RTK-Antenne auskommt, Steigungen von bis zu 80 Prozent bewältigen soll und dank ausfahrbarer Mähscheiben besonders nah an Rasenkanten arbeitet: Der Dreame A3 AWD Pro 3500 bringt zahlreiche Funktionen mit, die vor allem bei großen und anspruchsvollen Gärten interessant sind. Doch wie gut funktionieren […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/16/dreame-a3-awd-pro-3500-test/">Dreame A3 AWD Pro 3500 im Test: Mähroboter mit Allrad und LiDAR</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Thinking Machines stellt sein erstes KI-Modell „Inkling“ vor]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Thinking Machines steigt mit Inkling in den Wettbewerb offener KI-Modelle ein und setzt dabei auf Anpassbarkeit statt Spitzenleistung.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3673671/it-nachrichten/thinking-machines-stellt-sein-erstes-ki-modell-inkling-vor/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3673671/it-nachrichten/thinking-machines-stellt-sein-erstes-ki-modell-inkling-vor/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 15:47:39 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Thinking Machines steigt mit Inkling in den Wettbewerb offener KI-Modelle ein und setzt dabei auf Anpassbarkeit statt Spitzenleistung.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[DeepMind CEO pushes for AI industry self-regulation]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Google DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis is pushing for the US AI industry to self-regulate, with the support of government, as a starting point for an international creating shared international standards. In a blog post, he called for a focus on artificial general intelligence (AGI) and national secu...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3673460/it-nachrichten/deepmind-ceo-pushes-for-ai-industry-self-regulation/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3673460/it-nachrichten/deepmind-ceo-pushes-for-ai-industry-self-regulation/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 14:33:47 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Google DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis is pushing for the US AI industry to self-regulate, with the support of government, as a starting point for an international creating shared international standards. In a blog post, he called for a focus on <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4174181/google-talks-singularity-while-scaling-up-agentic-ai-for-enterprises-2.html">artificial general intelligence (AGI)</a> and national security. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But it is precisely that focus on national security that may make the results of such an effort, assuming it happens, less than palatable outside of the US.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The rapid progress we’re seeing in AI requires a new approach to testing frontier AI model capabilities that is dynamic, adaptable, and rigorous,” <a href="https://demishassabis.substack.com/p/a-framework-for-frontier-ai-and-the-dawning-of-a-new-age" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Hassabis wrote</a>. “The US is well positioned, given its economic and technical standing, to take the first step in developing such a framework. It could establish a new Standards Body modelled on a federally overseen public-private partnership or self-regulatory organization, much like the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), with a board that includes independent leading technical experts and open-source representatives.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">He noted, however, that the funding would need to be substantial, and would most likely come from industry, to allow the new body to attract world-class technical talent and obtain the necessary compute resources for large-scale testing.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Hassabis proposed that the organization “be responsible for developing assessment protocols and working with appropriate federal agencies and the US National Labs to conduct testing in areas relevant to national security,” and that AI vendor participants be encouraged to adopt best practices such as publishing model cards with technical details, maintaining strong internal cybersecurity, vetting key personnel, and providing sufficient resourcing for safety and security research.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is not the first time Hassabis has <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4178398/deepmind-ceo-agi-could-be-here-in-three-years.html" target="_blank">expressed worries about AGI</a>. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">DeepMind was involved in an earlier <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4168122/us-government-agency-to-safety-test-frontier-ai-models-before-release.html" target="_blank">US government initiative evaluating AI safety</a>, alongside Microsoft and xAI (now SpaceXAI) working with the Center for AI Standards and Innovation (CAISI), a division of the US Department of Commerce. It allowed CAISI to conduct pre-deployment evaluations and targeted research to “better assess frontier AI capabilities and advance the state of AI security.”  </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The rest of the world may have concerns</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Analysts and consultants were mixed about the move, with most expressing concerns about whether an industry-focused group would prioritize the public’s best interests.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Self-regulation is not viable because it implies everyone is able to regulate themselves and will do so in line with the best interests of the public. Most tech vendors don’t have the capacity to self-regulate. They would just prefer a set of rules within which they can operate,” said Gartner VP analyst <a href="https://www.gartner.com/en/experts/nader-henein" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Nader Henein</a>. “For-profit organizations are required to do what is best for their shareholders, and external regulation ensures that those organizations are never in a conflict of interest where they have to choose between what is good for their shareholders and what is good for the public.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And, said <a href="https://greyhoundresearch.com/svg/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Sanchit Vir Gogia</a>, chief analyst at Greyhound Research, given the international nature of AI models, an effort coordinated by the US government might alienate other countries. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“National security is the proposal’s accelerator in Washington and its poison pill abroad: the framing that opens the only gate available at home invites foreign capitals to read the institution as an instrument of American strategy,” he pointed out. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The map is already plural,” he said. “Brussels switches on enforcement powers over general-purpose models [starting in August 2026], London runs the AI Security Institute, and Beijing licenses on its own terms. California and New York have legislated for frontier models at home. The durable route is shared technical evidence with sovereign enforcement, sealed through mutual recognition rather than deference, with India and the other major non-Western markets holding authorship rather than seats.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Gogia added that the rules enacted by even such a group may not address all of the key concerns of enterprise IT. A US government effort along the lines that Hassabis is proposing would result in testing that “sits close to intelligence and industrial policy, and those functions will not stay neatly separated. A model can pass every catastrophic-risk test and still fail the enterprise on privacy, reliability, and liability,” he noted.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Walmart’s former director of cybersecurity <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/steveneric/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Steven Eric Fisher</a>, who is now an independent cybersecurity consultant, said he found the proposal “well-intentioned, but it addresses a highly polarized topic at a time when commercial interests carry unprecedented political influence, which is not always applied benevolently.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">He added, “an exclusive US standard that is not globally respected or enforceable would likely fail to achieve its core purpose and would place US companies at a competitive disadvantage.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/akm76/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Aman Mahapatra</a>, chief strategy officer for Tribeca Softtech, a New York City-based technology consulting firm, said that a deep dive into how <a href="https://www.finra.org/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">FINRA</a> operates today is illustrative of what IT leaders can expect from this effort, assuming the industry adopts that model.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“When the CEOs of the five companies that would be regulated are also the primary drafters of the standards, the standards will reflect those companies’ interests. FINRA has an independent board, but the operational reality is that member firm perspectives dominate the working groups that write the actual rules,” he said. “There is no reason to expect an AI equivalent to work differently, and every reason to expect it to work worse, because AI standardization is happening faster than any industry has ever attempted to standardize itself, and speed is the enemy of independent oversight.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/carmi/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Carmi Levy</a>, an independent technology analyst, was even more emphatically opposed to the Hassabis proposal.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Asking Big Tech companies to self-police is analogous to allowing foxes to guard the henhouse. It hasn’t worked to date, and it won’t work going forward. Expecting these organizations to somehow change their ways at this point in time represents the height of naïve thinking,” Levy said. “The framework proposed by Demis Hassabis is a self-serving roadmap for an industry bent on racing to the AI horizon regardless of the harms caused along the way. It is impossible to quantify the dangers to broader society should frameworks allowing self-regulation become the norm.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Some love the proposal</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">An almost completely opposite stance came from <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/yurigoryunov/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Yuri Goryunov</a>, CIO of consulting firm Acceligence, who applauded the proposed move.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“This is one of the rare setups where industry self-regulation has a real shot, and enterprise IT should be enthusiastically rooting for it,” he said. “It fails when harms are externalized, such as in social media content moderation. Or when the overseer outsources judgment to the overseen, such as the FAA’s delegation to Boeing before the 737 MAX. It works when everyone in the industry shares the catastrophic downside.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">He suggested, however, that the best precedent here isn’t FINRA, it’s INPO, the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations, which the nuclear industry created within months of the <a href="https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/3mile-isle" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1979 Three Mile Island partial reactor meltdown</a> “on the logic that an accident anywhere is an accident everywhere. INPO peer-reviews every US plant, its evaluations move insurance premiums, and it sits on top of the NRC’s statutory floor. That is a public-private stack very close to what Hassabis is describing. Frontier AI has the same structure: one lab’s catastrophic failure brings regulation down on all of them.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For enterprise CIOs and other IT executives, Goryunov said, that model has the potential for being a big win.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>“</strong>Today, every enterprise duplicates the same AI diligence of red-teaming, eval suites, governance committees and each does so with less information than any certifying body would have,” Goryunov said. “A credible standards regime does for AI what UL did for electrical equipment and SOC2 did for cloud: it converts an unknowable risk into a procurable product and gives boards a defensible standard of care. That’s not red tape. That’s peace of mind with an audit trail.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">However, Mahapatra said, “the countervailing view is that the alternative to industry-led standards is probably not thoughtful legislation. It is probably no standards, or state-by-state fragmentation, or the current pattern of ex-post enforcement actions where regulators surface concerns years after harm has already occurred.” </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Thus, he noted, “Hassabis is making the reasonable argument that imperfect fast standards are better than perfect slow ones, and there is genuine merit to that view for topics like agent identity, evaluation methodology, and interoperability, which are exactly the areas <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4196365/openclaw-becomes-a-nonprofit-foundation-as-it-seeks-to-be-the-switzerland-of-ai.html" target="_blank">OpenClaw is also targeting</a>.”</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[DeepMind CEO pushes for AI industry self-regulation]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Google DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis is pushing for the US AI industry to self-regulate, with the support of government, as a starting point for an international creating shared international standards. In a blog post, he called for a focus on artificial general intelligence (AGI) and national secu...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3673451/it-nachrichten/deepmind-ceo-pushes-for-ai-industry-self-regulation/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3673451/it-nachrichten/deepmind-ceo-pushes-for-ai-industry-self-regulation/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 14:33:34 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Google DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis is pushing for the US AI industry to self-regulate, with the support of government, as a starting point for an international creating shared international standards. In a blog post, he called for a focus on <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4174181/google-talks-singularity-while-scaling-up-agentic-ai-for-enterprises-2.html">artificial general intelligence (AGI)</a> and national security. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But it is precisely that focus on national security that may make the results of such an effort, assuming it happens, less than palatable outside of the US.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The rapid progress we’re seeing in AI requires a new approach to testing frontier AI model capabilities that is dynamic, adaptable, and rigorous,” <a href="https://demishassabis.substack.com/p/a-framework-for-frontier-ai-and-the-dawning-of-a-new-age" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Hassabis wrote</a>. “The US is well positioned, given its economic and technical standing, to take the first step in developing such a framework. It could establish a new Standards Body modelled on a federally overseen public-private partnership or self-regulatory organization, much like the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), with a board that includes independent leading technical experts and open-source representatives.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">He noted, however, that the funding would need to be substantial, and would most likely come from industry, to allow the new body to attract world-class technical talent and obtain the necessary compute resources for large-scale testing.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Hassabis proposed that the organization “be responsible for developing assessment protocols and working with appropriate federal agencies and the US National Labs to conduct testing in areas relevant to national security,” and that AI vendor participants be encouraged to adopt best practices such as publishing model cards with technical details, maintaining strong internal cybersecurity, vetting key personnel, and providing sufficient resourcing for safety and security research.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is not the first time Hassabis has <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4178398/deepmind-ceo-agi-could-be-here-in-three-years.html" target="_blank">expressed worries about AGI</a>. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">DeepMind was involved in an earlier <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4168122/us-government-agency-to-safety-test-frontier-ai-models-before-release.html" target="_blank">US government initiative evaluating AI safety</a>, alongside Microsoft and xAI (now SpaceXAI) working with the Center for AI Standards and Innovation (CAISI), a division of the US Department of Commerce. It allowed CAISI to conduct pre-deployment evaluations and targeted research to “better assess frontier AI capabilities and advance the state of AI security.”  </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The rest of the world may have concerns</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Analysts and consultants were mixed about the move, with most expressing concerns about whether an industry-focused group would prioritize the public’s best interests.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Self-regulation is not viable because it implies everyone is able to regulate themselves and will do so in line with the best interests of the public. Most tech vendors don’t have the capacity to self-regulate. They would just prefer a set of rules within which they can operate,” said Gartner VP analyst <a href="https://www.gartner.com/en/experts/nader-henein" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Nader Henein</a>. “For-profit organizations are required to do what is best for their shareholders, and external regulation ensures that those organizations are never in a conflict of interest where they have to choose between what is good for their shareholders and what is good for the public.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And, said <a href="https://greyhoundresearch.com/svg/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Sanchit Vir Gogia</a>, chief analyst at Greyhound Research, given the international nature of AI models, an effort coordinated by the US government might alienate other countries. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“National security is the proposal’s accelerator in Washington and its poison pill abroad: the framing that opens the only gate available at home invites foreign capitals to read the institution as an instrument of American strategy,” he pointed out. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The map is already plural,” he said. “Brussels switches on enforcement powers over general-purpose models [starting in August 2026], London runs the AI Security Institute, and Beijing licenses on its own terms. California and New York have legislated for frontier models at home. The durable route is shared technical evidence with sovereign enforcement, sealed through mutual recognition rather than deference, with India and the other major non-Western markets holding authorship rather than seats.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Gogia added that the rules enacted by even such a group may not address all of the key concerns of enterprise IT. A US government effort along the lines that Hassabis is proposing would result in testing that “sits close to intelligence and industrial policy, and those functions will not stay neatly separated. A model can pass every catastrophic-risk test and still fail the enterprise on privacy, reliability, and liability,” he noted.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Walmart’s former director of cybersecurity <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/steveneric/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Steven Eric Fisher</a>, who is now an independent cybersecurity consultant, said he found the proposal “well-intentioned, but it addresses a highly polarized topic at a time when commercial interests carry unprecedented political influence, which is not always applied benevolently.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">He added, “an exclusive US standard that is not globally respected or enforceable would likely fail to achieve its core purpose and would place US companies at a competitive disadvantage.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/akm76/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Aman Mahapatra</a>, chief strategy officer for Tribeca Softtech, a New York City-based technology consulting firm, said that a deep dive into how <a href="https://www.finra.org/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">FINRA</a> operates today is illustrative of what IT leaders can expect from this effort, assuming the industry adopts that model.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“When the CEOs of the five companies that would be regulated are also the primary drafters of the standards, the standards will reflect those companies’ interests. FINRA has an independent board, but the operational reality is that member firm perspectives dominate the working groups that write the actual rules,” he said. “There is no reason to expect an AI equivalent to work differently, and every reason to expect it to work worse, because AI standardization is happening faster than any industry has ever attempted to standardize itself, and speed is the enemy of independent oversight.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/carmi/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Carmi Levy</a>, an independent technology analyst, was even more emphatically opposed to the Hassabis proposal.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Asking Big Tech companies to self-police is analogous to allowing foxes to guard the henhouse. It hasn’t worked to date, and it won’t work going forward. Expecting these organizations to somehow change their ways at this point in time represents the height of naïve thinking,” Levy said. “The framework proposed by Demis Hassabis is a self-serving roadmap for an industry bent on racing to the AI horizon regardless of the harms caused along the way. It is impossible to quantify the dangers to broader society should frameworks allowing self-regulation become the norm.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Some love the proposal</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">An almost completely opposite stance came from <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/yurigoryunov/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Yuri Goryunov</a>, CIO of consulting firm Acceligence, who applauded the proposed move.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“This is one of the rare setups where industry self-regulation has a real shot, and enterprise IT should be enthusiastically rooting for it,” he said. “It fails when harms are externalized, such as in social media content moderation. Or when the overseer outsources judgment to the overseen, such as the FAA’s delegation to Boeing before the 737 MAX. It works when everyone in the industry shares the catastrophic downside.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">He suggested, however, that the best precedent here isn’t FINRA, it’s INPO, the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations, which the nuclear industry created within months of the <a href="https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/3mile-isle" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1979 Three Mile Island partial reactor meltdown</a> “on the logic that an accident anywhere is an accident everywhere. INPO peer-reviews every US plant, its evaluations move insurance premiums, and it sits on top of the NRC’s statutory floor. That is a public-private stack very close to what Hassabis is describing. Frontier AI has the same structure: one lab’s catastrophic failure brings regulation down on all of them.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For enterprise CIOs and other IT executives, Goryunov said, that model has the potential for being a big win.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>“</strong>Today, every enterprise duplicates the same AI diligence of red-teaming, eval suites, governance committees and each does so with less information than any certifying body would have,” Goryunov said. “A credible standards regime does for AI what UL did for electrical equipment and SOC2 did for cloud: it converts an unknowable risk into a procurable product and gives boards a defensible standard of care. That’s not red tape. That’s peace of mind with an audit trail.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">However, Mahapatra said, “the countervailing view is that the alternative to industry-led standards is probably not thoughtful legislation. It is probably no standards, or state-by-state fragmentation, or the current pattern of ex-post enforcement actions where regulators surface concerns years after harm has already occurred.” </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Thus, he noted, “Hassabis is making the reasonable argument that imperfect fast standards are better than perfect slow ones, and there is genuine merit to that view for topics like agent identity, evaluation methodology, and interoperability, which are exactly the areas <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4196365/openclaw-becomes-a-nonprofit-foundation-as-it-seeks-to-be-the-switzerland-of-ai.html" target="_blank">OpenClaw is also targeting</a>.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>This article first appeared on <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4197497/deepmind-ceo-pushes-for-ai-industry-self-regulation.html">CIO</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Mira Murati’s AI start-up unveils customisable model Inkling]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Inkling is Thinking Machines Lab's first big AI model launch, and comes a little more than a year after the start-up was founded.
Read more: Mira Murati’s AI start-up unveils customisable model Inkling]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3673316/it-nachrichten/mira-muratis-ai-start-up-unveils-customisable-model-inkling/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3673316/it-nachrichten/mira-muratis-ai-start-up-unveils-customisable-model-inkling/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 13:47:59 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inkling is Thinking Machines Lab's first big AI model launch, and comes a little more than a year after the start-up was founded.</p>
<p>Read more: <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.siliconrepublic.com/machines/mira-muratis-ai-start-up-unveils-customisable-open-source-model-inkling">Mira Murati’s AI start-up unveils customisable model Inkling</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Thinking Machines Lab offers enterprises a US alternative in open-weight AI]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Thinking Machines Lab, the San Francisco startup founded by former OpenAI CTO Mira Murati, has released Inkling, its first general-purpose AI model. The launch adds another US-developed entrant to an open-weight market where Chinese developers produce several leading coding and reasoning models.
...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3673263/it-nachrichten/thinking-machines-lab-offers-enterprises-a-us-alternative-in-open-weight-ai/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3673263/it-nachrichten/thinking-machines-lab-offers-enterprises-a-us-alternative-in-open-weight-ai/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 13:33:34 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Thinking Machines Lab, the San Francisco startup founded by former OpenAI <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/3829004/ex-openai-cto-mira-murati-launches-ai-startup-recruits-top-talent-from-rivals.html" target="_blank">CTO Mira Murati</a>, has released Inkling, its first general-purpose AI model. The launch adds another US-developed entrant to an open-weight market where <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4042964/chinas-deepseek-launches-v3-1-raising-stakes-for-enterprise-ai-adoption.html" target="_blank">Chinese developers</a> produce several leading coding and reasoning models.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Inkling uses a mixture-of-experts architecture with 975 billion total parameters, of which 41 billion are active during processing. It supports a context window of up to 1 million tokens and was pretrained on 45 trillion tokens spanning text, images, audio, and video. Thinking Machines said it also trained the model for coding, tool use, and multimodal tasks.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The release follows the October 2025 launch of Tinker, Thinking Machines’ first product and an API-based platform for <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3486375/finding-the-right-large-language-model-for-your-needs.html">customizing AI models</a>. Developers can fine-tune Inkling through the platform.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In a June 2026 assessment, AI model routing platform <a href="https://openrouter.ai/blog/insights/the-open-weight-models-that-matter-june-2026/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">OpenRouter</a> highlighted DeepSeek V4 Flash, GLM 5.2, MiniMax M3, and Nvidia Nemotron 3 Ultra as four notable open-weight models. Nemotron was the only US-developed model in the group.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Performance and developer access</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Thinking Machines Lab’s benchmark table shows mixed results. Inkling scored 77.6% on SWE-Bench Verified, behind DeepSeek V4 Pro and GLM 5.2 but ahead of Nvidia Nemotron 3 Ultra. It also recorded 74.1% on MCP Atlas, 77.1% on BrowseComp with context management, and 79.8% on IFBench.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Thinking Machines said Inkling’s result used a bash-only harness, while the comparison figures were reported by the competing models’ developers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The model includes a reasoning-effort setting that developers can adjust from 0.2 to 0.99. Thinking Machines said the setting allows users to balance performance against the number of generated tokens. In the company’s testing, Inkling matched Nemotron 3 Ultra’s Terminal Bench 2.1 score while generating about one-third as many tokens.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Developers can fine-tune Inkling through Tinker using context lengths of 64,000 or 256,000 tokens and test it through the Inkling Playground. The model is available through APIs from Together AI, Fireworks, Modal, Databricks, and Baseten. It is also supported by inference software, including SGLang, vLLM, TokenSpeed, llama.cpp, and Hugging Face Transformers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Inkling’s full weights are available on Hugging Face as the original checkpoint and as a quantized NVFP4 checkpoint. Thinking Machines also previewed Inkling-Small, which has 276 billion total parameters and 12 billion active parameters. The company said it would release the smaller model’s full weights after completing testing.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Enterprise impact</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Inkling’s differentiation lies in its open weights, multimodal capabilities, controllable reasoning, and integration with Tinker, rather than benchmark leadership, according to <a href="https://www.forrester.com/analyst-bio/biswajeet-mahapatra/BIO20046" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Biswajeet Mahapatra</a>, principal analyst at Forrester.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Enterprises are most likely to benefit in workloads where domain adaptation matters more than generic model performance, including knowledge-intensive copilots, multimodal customer service, document understanding, operational workflow automation, and agentic tasks that require organization-specific data, policies, and processes,” Mahapatra said.  </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Inkling’s US origin could also influence adoption among Western enterprises, according to <a href="https://pareekh.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Pareekh</a> Jain, CEO of Pareekh Consulting. He said many Western organizations face regulatory or procurement barriers when considering Chinese-developed AI models.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Inkling gives those organizations a US-developed open-weight option that they can deploy on their own infrastructure,” Jain said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">However, the benefits will need to be weighed against the cost of deploying the full model.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Running Inkling on private infrastructure requires a GPU cluster with at least 2 TB of aggregated VRAM for the BF16 checkpoint, according to the <a href="https://thinkingmachines.ai/model-card/inkling/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">model card</a>. Thinking Machines lists configurations of eight Nvidia B300 GPUs or 16 H200 GPUs. A quantized NVFP4 checkpoint lowers the requirement to at least 600 GB and can run on four B300 GPUs or eight H200 GPUs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Because Inkling is a massive model with 975 billion total parameters, running the full model still requires significant GPU infrastructure, making closed-model APIs more economical for many organizations,” Jain said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Jain said Inkling-Small may be a more feasible option for many enterprises because it could reduce infrastructure costs and latency while retaining useful performance across key workloads.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Safety and governance</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Thinking Machines said it trained Inkling for calibration, instruction following, and resistance to censorship. The company said the model showed “strong patterns of censorship non-compliance” when evaluated by Cognition on its Propaganda and Censorship Eval.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Inkling scored 98.6% on StrongREJECT, which Thinking Machines described as a test of whether models refuse unambiguous harmful requests.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The model’s safety behavior should be retested after an enterprise customizes it, according to Jain. “Model fine-tuning can weaken safety filters, so companies should retest safety after customizing the model rather than assuming it stays safe,” Jain said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">He added that self-hosted and modified versions could diverge from Thinking Machines’ official model over time without receiving automatic updates.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“CIOs need to ensure every AI agent action is logged, auditable, and governed by human approval for high-risk tasks,” Jain said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>The article originally appeared on <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4197743/thinking-machines-offers-enterprises-a-us-alternative-in-open-weight-ai.html">InfoWorld</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Thinking Machines offers enterprises a US alternative in open-weight AI]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Thinking Machines Lab, the San Francisco startup founded by former OpenAI CTO Mira Murati, has released Inkling, its first general-purpose AI model. The launch adds another US-developed entrant to an open-weight market where Chinese developers produce several leading coding and reasoning models.
...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3673185/ai-nachrichten/thinking-machines-offers-enterprises-a-us-alternative-in-open-weight-ai/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3673185/ai-nachrichten/thinking-machines-offers-enterprises-a-us-alternative-in-open-weight-ai/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 13:04:14 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Thinking Machines Lab, the San Francisco startup founded by former OpenAI <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/3829004/ex-openai-cto-mira-murati-launches-ai-startup-recruits-top-talent-from-rivals.html" target="_blank">CTO Mira Murati</a>, has released Inkling, its first general-purpose AI model. The launch adds another US-developed entrant to an open-weight market where <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4042964/chinas-deepseek-launches-v3-1-raising-stakes-for-enterprise-ai-adoption.html" target="_blank">Chinese developers</a> produce several leading coding and reasoning models.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Inkling uses a mixture-of-experts architecture with 975 billion total parameters, of which 41 billion are active during processing. It supports a context window of up to 1 million tokens and was pretrained on 45 trillion tokens spanning text, images, audio, and video. Thinking Machines said it also trained the model for coding, tool use, and multimodal tasks.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The release follows the October 2025 launch of Tinker, Thinking Machines’ first product and an API-based platform for <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3486375/finding-the-right-large-language-model-for-your-needs.html">customizing AI models</a>. Developers can fine-tune Inkling through the platform.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In a June 2026 assessment, AI model routing platform <a href="https://openrouter.ai/blog/insights/the-open-weight-models-that-matter-june-2026/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">OpenRouter</a> highlighted DeepSeek V4 Flash, GLM 5.2, MiniMax M3, and Nvidia Nemotron 3 Ultra as four notable open-weight models. Nemotron was the only US-developed model in the group.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Performance and developer access</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Thinking Machines Lab’s benchmark table shows mixed results. Inkling scored 77.6% on SWE-Bench Verified, behind DeepSeek V4 Pro and GLM 5.2 but ahead of Nvidia Nemotron 3 Ultra. It also recorded 74.1% on MCP Atlas, 77.1% on BrowseComp with context management, and 79.8% on IFBench.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Thinking Machines said Inkling’s result used a bash-only harness, while the comparison figures were reported by the competing models’ developers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The model includes a reasoning-effort setting that developers can adjust from 0.2 to 0.99. Thinking Machines said the setting allows users to balance performance against the number of generated tokens. In the company’s testing, Inkling matched Nemotron 3 Ultra’s Terminal Bench 2.1 score while generating about one-third as many tokens.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Developers can fine-tune Inkling through Tinker using context lengths of 64,000 or 256,000 tokens and test it through the Inkling Playground. The model is available through APIs from Together AI, Fireworks, Modal, Databricks, and Baseten. It is also supported by inference software, including SGLang, vLLM, TokenSpeed, llama.cpp, and Hugging Face Transformers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Inkling’s full weights are available on Hugging Face as the original checkpoint and as a quantized NVFP4 checkpoint. Thinking Machines also previewed Inkling-Small, which has 276 billion total parameters and 12 billion active parameters. The company said it would release the smaller model’s full weights after completing testing.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Enterprise impact</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Inkling’s differentiation lies in its open weights, multimodal capabilities, controllable reasoning, and integration with Tinker, rather than benchmark leadership, according to <a href="https://www.forrester.com/analyst-bio/biswajeet-mahapatra/BIO20046" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Biswajeet Mahapatra</a>, principal analyst at Forrester.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Enterprises are most likely to benefit in workloads where domain adaptation matters more than generic model performance, including knowledge-intensive copilots, multimodal customer service, document understanding, operational workflow automation, and agentic tasks that require organization-specific data, policies, and processes,” Mahapatra said.  </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Inkling’s US origin could also influence adoption among Western enterprises, according to <a href="https://pareekh.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Pareekh</a> Jain, CEO of Pareekh Consulting. He said many Western organizations face regulatory or procurement barriers when considering Chinese-developed AI models.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Inkling gives those organizations a US-developed open-weight option that they can deploy on their own infrastructure,” Jain said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">However, the benefits will need to be weighed against the cost of deploying the full model.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Running Inkling on private infrastructure requires a GPU cluster with at least 2 TB of aggregated VRAM for the BF16 checkpoint, according to the <a href="https://thinkingmachines.ai/model-card/inkling/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">model card</a>. Thinking Machines lists configurations of eight Nvidia B300 GPUs or 16 H200 GPUs. A quantized NVFP4 checkpoint lowers the requirement to at least 600 GB and can run on four B300 GPUs or eight H200 GPUs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Because Inkling is a massive model with 975 billion total parameters, running the full model still requires significant GPU infrastructure, making closed-model APIs more economical for many organizations,” Jain said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Jain said Inkling-Small may be a more feasible option for many enterprises because it could reduce infrastructure costs and latency while retaining useful performance across key workloads.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Safety and governance</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Thinking Machines said it trained Inkling for calibration, instruction following, and resistance to censorship. The company said the model showed “strong patterns of censorship non-compliance” when evaluated by Cognition on its Propaganda and Censorship Eval.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Inkling scored 98.6% on StrongREJECT, which Thinking Machines described as a test of whether models refuse unambiguous harmful requests.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The model’s safety behavior should be retested after an enterprise customizes it, according to Jain. “Model fine-tuning can weaken safety filters, so companies should retest safety after customizing the model rather than assuming it stays safe,” Jain said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">He added that self-hosted and modified versions could diverge from Thinking Machines’ official model over time without receiving automatic updates.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“CIOs need to ensure every AI agent action is logged, auditable, and governed by human approval for high-risk tasks,” Jain said.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Ex-OpenAI CTO Murati's Thinking Machines drops Inkling, a 975B parameter model that leads US labs but trails China]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Thinking Machines Lab, founded by former OpenAI CTO Mira Murati, has released Inkling, a multimodal open-weights model with 975 billion parameters. It leads U.S. open-weights models on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, though top Chinese open models still beat it on some tasks. Pricing ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3673031/ai-nachrichten/ex-openai-cto-muratis-thinking-machines-drops-inkling-a-975b-parameter-model-that-leads-us-labs-but-trails-china/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3673031/ai-nachrichten/ex-openai-cto-muratis-thinking-machines-drops-inkling-a-975b-parameter-model-that-leads-us-labs-but-trails-china/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 12:04:41 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="1256" height="801" src="https://the-decoder.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/thinking_machines_inkling_logo.png" class="attachment-full size-full wp-post-image" alt="" decoding="async" fetchpriority="high"></p>
<p>        Thinking Machines Lab, founded by former OpenAI CTO Mira Murati, has released Inkling, a multimodal open-weights model with 975 billion parameters. It leads U.S. open-weights models on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, though top Chinese open models still beat it on some tasks. Pricing starts at $1.87 per million input tokens, and Thinking Machines is pitching Inkling as a base for fine-tuning rather than the most powerful model available.</p>
<p>The article <a href="https://the-decoder.com/ex-openai-cto-muratis-thinking-machines-drops-inkling-a-975b-parameter-model-that-leads-us-labs-but-trails-china/">Ex-OpenAI CTO Murati's Thinking Machines drops Inkling, a 975B parameter model that leads US labs but trails China</a> appeared first on <a href="https://the-decoder.com/">The Decoder</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[New agentic compute patterns]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[For a decade, Kubernetes was the right answer. It organized containers, scaled services horizontally and gave platform teams a shared vocabulary for running software in production. It abstracted away enough of the underlying complexity that engineers could stop thinking about servers and start th...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3672922/ai-nachrichten/new-agentic-compute-patterns/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3672922/ai-nachrichten/new-agentic-compute-patterns/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 11:19:03 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For a decade, Kubernetes was the right answer. It organized containers, scaled services horizontally and gave platform teams a shared vocabulary for running software in production. It abstracted away enough of the underlying complexity that engineers could stop thinking about servers and start thinking about services. Most cloud-native infrastructure today is built on top of it, directly or in spirit, and EKS made that model the default for the majority of enterprise teams running workloads on AWS.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The workload that defined that era was the stateless HTTP request, fast in, fast out, disposable. A user action triggers a request, the request hits a service, the service returns a response and the container is done. Kubernetes was optimized for that pattern down to the scheduler internals: Bin-pack containers onto nodes, autoscale on CPU and memory, evict and reschedule when something goes wrong. The whole system is tuned around the assumption that individual units of work are short, stateless and interchangeable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That assumption no longer holds for the workloads that matter most right now.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The agent workload is structurally different</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Agents are long-running, stateful processes. They reason across time, call external tools, spawn subprocesses, write and execute code, and make decisions that depend on what happened five steps earlier in the same task. A single-agent workflow might run for minutes or hours, touching a dozen external systems and generating intermediate outputs that subsequent steps depend on. The compute layer for that kind of work needs to do things the old model was never asked to do. That is the new pattern: Execution infrastructure designed around agent semantics rather than request semantics.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Kubernetes community itself has acknowledged this mismatch. In March 2026, Kubernetes SIG Apps published an<a href="https://url.usb.m.mimecastprotect.com/s/U22qCA8LmLh7yY0jIGfGfGdvGo?domain=kubernetes.io/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> introduction to Agent Sandbox</a>, a new CRD-based abstraction designed specifically for singleton, stateful agent workloads. The framing is direct: The ecosystem is moving from short-lived, isolated tasks to deploying multiple, coordinated AI agents that run continuously, and mapping those workloads to traditional Kubernetes primitives requires an entirely new abstraction. The fact that the Kubernetes maintainers built a dedicated primitive for this, rather than recommending teams compose one from existing resources, is itself the clearest signal that agent execution does not fit the old model.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What agent execution actually requires</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Concretely, it requires four things. First, isolated execution environments that provision in milliseconds, not minutes, so each agent task gets its own sandbox for code execution and tool calls without blocking the reasoning loop. The difference between a two-second environment and a two-minute environment is not a performance optimization; it determines whether the architecture is viable at all. Second, durable state management across the full task lifecycle, so an agent can pause, hand off or resume without re-initializing from scratch and burning tokens to reconstruct context it already built. Third, coordination primitives for multi-agent work: The ability to spawn subagents, pass structured outputs between them and track task dependencies across a graph of concurrent processes. Production agent systems are rarely single agents; they are pipelines of specialized agents with handoffs that need to be reliable and inspectable. Fourth, credentials and secrets management that travel with the execution context, so agents can authenticate to external services securely without exposing credentials in the task definition, logs or the environment variables of a shared container.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The mismatch shows up fast in production</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Kubernetes and EKS expose the mismatch quickly in practice. Pod eviction terminates an agent mid-task with no clean recovery path. Autoscaling reads CPU utilization as the load signal, but an agent holding a long inference connection looks idle to the scheduler even when it is doing the most consequential work in the pipeline. Provisioning a new environment takes 45 seconds to two minutes on a well-tuned cluster; agent workloads need that in under two seconds or the reasoning loop stalls and the user experience degrades visibly. These are not edge cases or misconfigurations. They are the normal operating conditions for production agent workloads running on infrastructure that was not designed for them.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The utilization data makes the broader cost picture even starker. The<a href="https://url.usb.m.mimecastprotect.com/s/zk-6CB1MnMHEQoqvI6hNf2eRQz?domain=cast.ai/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> 2026 State of Kubernetes Optimization Report</a> from CAST AI, drawn from analysis of over 23,000 production clusters across AWS, Azure and GCP, found average CPU utilization at 8 percent, down from 10 percent the year prior. Memory utilization fell from 23 to 20 percent. CPU overprovisioning jumped from 40 to 69 percent year over year. These numbers reflect clusters running traditional workloads, and the pattern is worsening, not improving, as environments scale. Agent workloads compound this problem further. An agent holding an open inference connection or waiting on a tool call registers as idle to a scheduler that reads CPU and memory as the only meaningful load signals. The infrastructure responds to the wrong metric, overprovisioning capacity for demand it cannot measure, while the actual bottleneck, environment provisioning latency and state continuity, goes unaddressed.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Security is not the same problem it was before</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Agent workloads change the threat model at the infrastructure level. A compromised stateless service exposes a narrow surface defined by its API contracts. A compromised agent exposes every system it can reach, every credential it holds and every action it is authorized to take on behalf of the user. Agents generate and execute their own code, make non-deterministic tool-call decisions and accumulate context across long-running sessions. Standard container namespacing does not contain that kind of risk. Kernel-level isolation, default-deny network egress, scoped credentials per session and agent-aware observability are not optional hardening steps. They are baseline requirements for running agents in production.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What teams that ship agents have already figured out</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Some of the clearest evidence for this shift comes not from infrastructure vendors but from product engineering teams running agents at scale on their own code. In late 2025, Ramp’s engineering team published a<a href="https://url.usb.m.mimecastprotect.com/s/Co8bCDwO0Ohg2PpXhAiRfjbcM8?domain=engineering.ramp.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> detailed account of building Inspect</a>, their internal background coding agent. Each Inspect session runs in a sandboxed VM with a full-stack development environment and deep integrations across their observability, CI, and deployment tooling. The architecture requirements map almost exactly to the four primitives above. Filesystem snapshots keep sessions starting in seconds rather than minutes. Sessions are isolated and stateful. The agent can run tests, review telemetry, query feature flags and visually verify frontend changes in a real browser. And the whole system supports unlimited concurrency, so engineers can spin up ten parallel sessions exploring different approaches to the same problem without contention.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The results speak for themselves. Within months of launch, roughly 30 percent of all pull requests merged to Ramp’s frontend and backend repositories were written by Inspect. That level of adoption was not mandated. It happened because the execution environment was fast enough, capable enough and well-integrated enough that the agent was strictly better than a local workflow for a meaningful share of tasks. The key insight from the Ramp case is not about the model. It is about the execution layer. As their team put it, session speed should only be limited by model-provider time-to-first-token; everything else, like cloning and installing, needs to be done before the session starts. That is a statement about infrastructure, not intelligence.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The ecosystem is catching up, but defaults are sticky</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of that is a criticism of the tools. Kubernetes solved exactly the problem it was designed for, and it solved it well. The issue is that infrastructure defaults are sticky. Teams inherit them, build on top of them and optimize within their constraints long after the underlying workload has changed. The Kubernetes community’s own response, the<a href="https://url.usb.m.mimecastprotect.com/s/U22qCA8LmLh7yY0jIGfGfGdvGo?domain=kubernetes.io/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> Agent Sandbox project under SIG Apps</a>, validates the thesis that a new abstraction is necessary. The new primitives the community is building include warm pools for near-zero cold starts, lifecycle management for suspending and resuming idle agents without losing state, and pluggable kernel isolation for secure execution of untrusted code. These are not incremental improvements to existing resources. They are net-new abstractions that acknowledge the old model does not stretch to fit.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But adoption of purpose-built agent infrastructure remains early. Enterprises building agent pipelines today are largely running a request-oriented orchestration model against an execution-oriented workload, and the mismatch shows up in task failure rates, runaway costs and debugging cycles that have no good tooling because the observability layer was also designed for stateless services.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The structural advantage is available now</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The infrastructure to close that gap exists now. The prerequisite is recognizing that agent execution is a first-class compute pattern with its own primitives and its own requirements, not a variant of the stateless service model that defined the last decade. Teams that make that shift early will have a meaningful structural advantage. The ones that do not will spend the next two years wondering why their agent systems are unreliable at a scale that should be tractable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[IT leaders prioritize addressing AI skill concerns]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Recent data from the CompTIA Tech Jobs Report shows that tech jobs have seen a drop in unemployment, down to 3.1% in May from 3.5% in April, accounting for an increase of around 6,700 in May. Roles that saw the highest demand include software developers and engineers, systems engineers and archit...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3672916/it-nachrichten/it-leaders-prioritize-addressing-ai-skill-concerns/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3672916/it-nachrichten/it-leaders-prioritize-addressing-ai-skill-concerns/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 11:18:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Recent data from the <a href="https://www.comptia.org/en-us/resources/research/tech-jobs-report/">CompTIA Tech Jobs Report</a> shows that tech jobs have seen a drop in unemployment, down to 3.1% in May from 3.5% in April, accounting for an increase of around 6,700 in May. Roles that saw the highest demand include software developers and engineers, systems engineers and architects, tech support specialists, cybersecurity engineers and analysts, and AI engineers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And according to projections form the <a href="https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2026/article/industry-and-occupational-employment-projections-overview.htm">U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics</a>, the tech workforce is anticipated to grow twice as fast as the overall US workforce, with an expected replacement rate of 6% annually, or approximately 323,000 workers, for tech occupations between 2024 and 2034.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“More than ever, business success relies on technology,” said Seth Robinson, VP of  industry research at CompTIA. “Our research has shown a desire to build capability in core operational functions, which then allows companies to build advanced practices in AI, data, and cybersecurity.”Further data, this time from the <a href="https://www.comptia.org/en-us/resources/research/state-of-the-tech-workforce-2026/">CompTIA Sate of the Tech Workforce 2026</a> report, shows that 83% of IT leaders and HR professionals say their organizations are placing a high or moderately high priority on addressing skill concerns, and 62% say they expect the budget for AI training to increase in the next year. Organizations also seem to recognize the impact that skills development can have on employees, with 83% saying they expect these investments to have a high or moderate degree of impact on employee morale and engagement.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Cause and effect</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There are two main factors driving the skills gap and pushing IT leaders to invest in training programs: AI accelerating technological change, and a shortage of AI skilled professionals in the hiring market. However, while AI is a main driver in the skills gap, 48% of IT leaders also say AI is crowding out other important needs, including a much-needed shift to skills-based hiring methodologies.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">IT leaders are looking to build training programs that specifically address AI basics, data analysis, AI threat awareness, automation, data preparation, securing AI systems, building inputs and prompts, and creating AI agents. Currently IT leaders cite cost of training, training fatigue, turnover, lack of executive support, difficulty measuring ROI, and stale training curriculum as some of the biggest challenges when developing training programs, according to CompTIA.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">So organizations that embark on upskilling and training will need a robust strategy in place to ensure employees take advantage of the training and remain engaged. Leaders will also need to set the expectations for how to integrate training into daily work, so they aren’t left feeling overwhelmed by the process on top of their current roles.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“What we’ve found that works is to embed AI into people’s workflows after the initial training, and pair people with colleagues who are further along in their AI utilization,” says Maruf Ahmed, CEO of IT solutions provider Dexian. “The gap between ‘I attended the training’ and ‘I’m actually using this differently in my job’ is where companies lose people, and closing it takes more than a single training cycle.”</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Kein Bock mehr auf Social Media: Warum fast jeder Zweite seine Apps löscht]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag Kein Bock mehr auf Social Media: Warum fast jeder Zweite seine Apps löscht erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Immer mehr Menschen kehren Social Media aufgrund digitaler Erschöpfung ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3672865/it-nachrichten/kein-bock-mehr-auf-social-media-warum-fast-jeder-zweite-seine-apps-loescht/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3672865/it-nachrichten/kein-bock-mehr-auf-social-media-warum-fast-jeder-zweite-seine-apps-loescht/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 11:03:08 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/16/digitale-erschoepfung-in-sozialen-medien/">Kein Bock mehr auf Social Media: Warum fast jeder Zweite seine Apps löscht</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Immer mehr Menschen kehren Social Media aufgrund digitaler Erschöpfung den Rücken. Laut einer aktuellen Analyse hat fast jeder Zweite schon einmal eine App gelöscht, weil sie Stress oder Angst ausgelöst hat. Kein Wunder: Die Plattformen tun alles dafür, ihre Nutzer mit psychologischen Tricks in einer Endlosschleife aus Likes, Benachrichtigungen und der Angst, etwas zu verpassen, […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/16/digitale-erschoepfung-in-sozialen-medien/">Kein Bock mehr auf Social Media: Warum fast jeder Zweite seine Apps löscht</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Thinking Machines Lab Debuts First AI Model]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Mira Murati-founded AI start-up releases large open-weight model as company pushes vision of AI that users can personalise to their needs This article has been indexed from Silicon UK Read the original article: Thinking Machines Lab Debuts First AI Model
Read more →
The post Thinking Machines Lab...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3672855/it-security-nachrichten/thinking-machines-lab-debuts-first-ai-model/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3672855/it-security-nachrichten/thinking-machines-lab-debuts-first-ai-model/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 10:52:59 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mira Murati-founded AI start-up releases large open-weight model as company pushes vision of AI that users can personalise to their needs This article has been indexed from Silicon UK Read the original article: Thinking Machines Lab Debuts First AI Model</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/thinking-machines-lab-debuts-first-ai-model/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/thinking-machines-lab-debuts-first-ai-model/">Thinking Machines Lab Debuts First AI Model</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Mira Murati’s AI start-up unveils customisable, open source model Inkling]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Inkling is Thinking Machines Labs' first big AI model launch, and comes a year after the start-up was founded.
Read more: Mira Murati’s AI start-up unveils customisable, open source model Inkling]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3672744/it-nachrichten/mira-muratis-ai-start-up-unveils-customisable-open-source-model-inkling/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3672744/it-nachrichten/mira-muratis-ai-start-up-unveils-customisable-open-source-model-inkling/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 10:02:57 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inkling is Thinking Machines Labs' first big AI model launch, and comes a year after the start-up was founded.</p>
<p>Read more: <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.siliconrepublic.com/business/mira-muratis-ai-start-up-unveils-customisable-open-source-model-inkling">Mira Murati’s AI start-up unveils customisable, open source model Inkling</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[[NotCVE-2026-0001] Cloudflare Universal SSL CAA augmentation weakens RFC 8657 account binding — CVE-2026-14440 assigned 163 days after public no-CVE disclosure]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Posted by NotCVE Advisories on Jul 15----------------------------------------------------------------------------
NotCVE Disclosure Update — NotCVE-2026-0001 / CVE-2026-14440
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

[-] Summary:

On 2026-01-19 the issue descri...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3672370/it-security-nachrichten/notcve-2026-0001-cloudflare-universal-ssl-caa-augmentation-weakens-rfc-8657-account-binding-cve-2026-14440-assigned-163-days-after-public-no-cve-disclosure/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3672370/it-security-nachrichten/notcve-2026-0001-cloudflare-universal-ssl-caa-augmentation-weakens-rfc-8657-account-binding-cve-2026-14440-assigned-163-days-after-public-no-cve-disclosure/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 07:08:39 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Posted by NotCVE Advisories on Jul 15</p>----------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
NotCVE Disclosure Update — NotCVE-2026-0001 / CVE-2026-14440<br>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
<br>
[-] Summary:<br>
<br>
On 2026-01-19 the issue described below was published as NotCVE-2026-0001<br>
after no CVE identifier was assigned for it. On 2026-07-01 — 163 days<br>
later — Cloudflare assigned CVE-2026-14440 to the same issue, now...<br>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Who governs your AI agents?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Your team spent a decade maturing privileged access management. Then AI agents arrived and they don’t log in like humans. Now your biggest insider threat is an AI agent that lacks the access it needs, and then it goes to get it.
In this episode Sundari Parekh, VP of AI Security and Cyber Risk Adv...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3672366/it-security-nachrichten/who-governs-your-ai-agents/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3672366/it-security-nachrichten/who-governs-your-ai-agents/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 07:08:35 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Your team spent a decade maturing privileged access management. Then AI agents arrived and they don’t log in like humans. Now your biggest insider threat is an AI agent that lacks the access it needs, and then it goes to get it.
In this episode Sundari Parekh, VP of AI Security and Cyber Risk Advisory for TrendAI™, addresses a hard truth: PAM was never fully solved, and non-human identity and agentic AI are amplifying the gap. Her fix: stop building a separate AI team, upend your identity thinking, and shift from gatekeeping AI adoption to safely enabling it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Eltern verlieren wegen Smartphones Bindung zu ihren Kindern]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag Eltern verlieren wegen Smartphones Bindung zu ihren Kindern erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Wenn Eltern ständig auf ihre Smartphones schauen, kann das die Beziehung zu ihren Kind...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3672281/it-nachrichten/eltern-verlieren-wegen-smartphones-bindung-zu-ihren-kindern/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3672281/it-nachrichten/eltern-verlieren-wegen-smartphones-bindung-zu-ihren-kindern/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 05:47:21 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/16/eltern-smartphone-beziehung-kinder/">Eltern verlieren wegen Smartphones Bindung zu ihren Kindern</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Wenn Eltern ständig auf ihre Smartphones schauen, kann das die Beziehung zu ihren Kindern schwächen. Das zeigt eine aktuelle Studie aus den USA. Hintergrund ist ein Effekt namens Technoference. Wir erklären dir, was es damit auf sich hat.  Eine Welt ohne Smartphones ist für viele nicht mehr vorstellbar. Vor allem für die neue Generation, ist […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/16/eltern-smartphone-beziehung-kinder/">Eltern verlieren wegen Smartphones Bindung zu ihren Kindern</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- Generated in 0,91ms -->